Modified README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,167 @@
|
|
|
|
1 |
---
|
2 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
|
2 |
---
|
3 |
+
language:
|
4 |
+
- en
|
5 |
+
tags:
|
6 |
+
- llama-2
|
7 |
+
- self-instruct
|
8 |
+
- distillation
|
9 |
+
- synthetic instruction
|
10 |
+
license:
|
11 |
+
- mit
|
12 |
---
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
# Model Card: speechless-hermes-coig-lite-13b
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
Fine-tune the Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b with COIG-PC-LITE for Chinese capability.
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
# Model Card: Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
Compute provided by our project sponsor Redmond AI, thank you! Follow RedmondAI on Twitter @RedmondAI.
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
## Model Description
|
24 |
+
|
25 |
+
Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b is a state-of-the-art language model fine-tuned on over 300,000 instructions. This model was fine-tuned by Nous Research, with Teknium and Emozilla leading the fine tuning process and dataset curation, Redmond AI sponsoring the compute, and several other contributors.
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
This Hermes model uses the exact same dataset as Hermes on Llama-1. This is to ensure consistency between the old Hermes and new, for anyone who wanted to keep Hermes as similar to the old one, just more capable.
|
28 |
+
|
29 |
+
This model stands out for its long responses, lower hallucination rate, and absence of OpenAI censorship mechanisms. The fine-tuning process was performed with a 4096 sequence length on an 8x a100 80GB DGX machine.
|
30 |
+
|
31 |
+
## Example Outputs:
|
32 |
+
![Example4](https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b/resolve/main/example5.png "Example 4")
|
33 |
+
![Example1](https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b/resolve/main/Example1.png "Example 1")
|
34 |
+
![Example2](https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b/resolve/main/example2.png "Example 2")
|
35 |
+
![Example3](https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Nous-Hermes-Llama2-13b/resolve/main/example3.png "Example 3")
|
36 |
+
|
37 |
+
## Model Training
|
38 |
+
|
39 |
+
The model was trained almost entirely on synthetic GPT-4 outputs. Curating high quality GPT-4 datasets enables incredibly high quality in knowledge, task completion, and style.
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
This includes data from diverse sources such as GPTeacher, the general, roleplay v1&2, code instruct datasets, Nous Instruct & PDACTL (unpublished), and several others, detailed further below
|
42 |
+
|
43 |
+
## Collaborators
|
44 |
+
The model fine-tuning and the datasets were a collaboration of efforts and resources between Teknium, Karan4D, Emozilla, Huemin Art, and Redmond AI.
|
45 |
+
|
46 |
+
Special mention goes to @winglian for assisting in some of the training issues.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
Huge shoutout and acknowledgement is deserved for all the dataset creators who generously share their datasets openly.
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
Among the contributors of datasets:
|
51 |
+
- GPTeacher was made available by Teknium
|
52 |
+
- Wizard LM by nlpxucan
|
53 |
+
- Nous Research Instruct Dataset was provided by Karan4D and HueminArt.
|
54 |
+
- GPT4-LLM and Unnatural Instructions were provided by Microsoft
|
55 |
+
- Airoboros dataset by jondurbin
|
56 |
+
- Camel-AI's domain expert datasets are from Camel-AI
|
57 |
+
- CodeAlpaca dataset by Sahil 2801.
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
If anyone was left out, please open a thread in the community tab.
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
## Prompt Format
|
62 |
+
|
63 |
+
The model follows the Alpaca prompt format:
|
64 |
+
```
|
65 |
+
### Instruction:
|
66 |
+
<prompt>
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
### Response:
|
69 |
+
<leave a newline blank for model to respond>
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
```
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
or
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
```
|
76 |
+
### Instruction:
|
77 |
+
<prompt>
|
78 |
+
|
79 |
+
### Input:
|
80 |
+
<additional context>
|
81 |
+
|
82 |
+
### Response:
|
83 |
+
<leave a newline blank for model to respond>
|
84 |
+
|
85 |
+
```
|
86 |
+
|
87 |
+
## Benchmark Results
|
88 |
+
AGI-Eval
|
89 |
+
```
|
90 |
+
| Task |Version| Metric |Value | |Stderr|
|
91 |
+
|agieval_aqua_rat | 0|acc |0.2362|± |0.0267|
|
92 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.2480|± |0.0272|
|
93 |
+
|agieval_logiqa_en | 0|acc |0.3425|± |0.0186|
|
94 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.3472|± |0.0187|
|
95 |
+
|agieval_lsat_ar | 0|acc |0.2522|± |0.0287|
|
96 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.2087|± |0.0269|
|
97 |
+
|agieval_lsat_lr | 0|acc |0.3510|± |0.0212|
|
98 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.3627|± |0.0213|
|
99 |
+
|agieval_lsat_rc | 0|acc |0.4647|± |0.0305|
|
100 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.4424|± |0.0303|
|
101 |
+
|agieval_sat_en | 0|acc |0.6602|± |0.0331|
|
102 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.6165|± |0.0340|
|
103 |
+
|agieval_sat_en_without_passage| 0|acc |0.4320|± |0.0346|
|
104 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.4272|± |0.0345|
|
105 |
+
|agieval_sat_math | 0|acc |0.2909|± |0.0307|
|
106 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.2727|± |0.0301|
|
107 |
+
```
|
108 |
+
GPT-4All Benchmark Set
|
109 |
+
```
|
110 |
+
| Task |Version| Metric |Value | |Stderr|
|
111 |
+
|arc_challenge| 0|acc |0.5102|± |0.0146|
|
112 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.5213|± |0.0146|
|
113 |
+
|arc_easy | 0|acc |0.7959|± |0.0083|
|
114 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.7567|± |0.0088|
|
115 |
+
|boolq | 1|acc |0.8394|± |0.0064|
|
116 |
+
|hellaswag | 0|acc |0.6164|± |0.0049|
|
117 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.8009|± |0.0040|
|
118 |
+
|openbookqa | 0|acc |0.3580|± |0.0215|
|
119 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.4620|± |0.0223|
|
120 |
+
|piqa | 0|acc |0.7992|± |0.0093|
|
121 |
+
| | |acc_norm|0.8069|± |0.0092|
|
122 |
+
|winogrande | 0|acc |0.7127|± |0.0127|
|
123 |
+
```
|
124 |
+
BigBench Reasoning Test
|
125 |
+
```
|
126 |
+
| Task |Version| Metric |Value | |Stderr|
|
127 |
+
|
128 |
+
|bigbench_causal_judgement | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.5526|± |0.0362|
|
129 |
+
|bigbench_date_understanding | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.7344|± |0.0230|
|
130 |
+
|bigbench_disambiguation_qa | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.2636|± |0.0275|
|
131 |
+
|bigbench_geometric_shapes | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.0195|± |0.0073|
|
132 |
+
| | |exact_str_match |0.0000|± |0.0000|
|
133 |
+
|bigbench_logical_deduction_five_objects | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.2760|± |0.0200|
|
134 |
+
|bigbench_logical_deduction_seven_objects | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.2100|± |0.0154|
|
135 |
+
|bigbench_logical_deduction_three_objects | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.4400|± |0.0287|
|
136 |
+
|bigbench_movie_recommendation | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.2440|± |0.0192|
|
137 |
+
|bigbench_navigate | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.4950|± |0.0158|
|
138 |
+
|bigbench_reasoning_about_colored_objects | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.5570|± |0.0111|
|
139 |
+
|bigbench_ruin_names | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.3728|± |0.0229|
|
140 |
+
|bigbench_salient_translation_error_detection | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.1854|± |0.0123|
|
141 |
+
|bigbench_snarks | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.6298|± |0.0360|
|
142 |
+
|bigbench_sports_understanding | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.6156|± |0.0155|
|
143 |
+
|bigbench_temporal_sequences | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.3140|± |0.0147|
|
144 |
+
|bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_five_objects | 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.2032|± |0.0114|
|
145 |
+
|bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_seven_objects| 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.1406|± |0.0083|
|
146 |
+
|bigbench_tracking_shuffled_objects_three_objects| 0|multiple_choice_grade|0.4400|± |0.0287|
|
147 |
+
```
|
148 |
+
|
149 |
+
These are the highest benchmarks Hermes has seen on every metric, achieving the following average scores:
|
150 |
+
- GPT4All benchmark average is now 70.0 - from 68.8 in Hermes-Llama1
|
151 |
+
- 0.3657 on BigBench, up from 0.328 on hermes-llama1
|
152 |
+
- 0.372 on AGIEval, up from 0.354 on Hermes-llama1
|
153 |
+
|
154 |
+
These benchmarks currently have us at #1 on ARC-c, ARC-e, Hellaswag, and OpenBookQA, and 2nd place on Winogrande, comparing to GPT4all's benchmarking list, supplanting Hermes 1 for the new top position.
|
155 |
+
|
156 |
+
## Resources for Applied Use Cases:
|
157 |
+
Check out LM Studio for a nice chatgpt style interface here: https://lmstudio.ai/
|
158 |
+
For an example of a back and forth chatbot using huggingface transformers and discord, check out: https://github.com/teknium1/alpaca-discord
|
159 |
+
For an example of a roleplaying discord chatbot, check out this: https://github.com/teknium1/alpaca-roleplay-discordbot
|
160 |
+
|
161 |
+
## Future Plans
|
162 |
+
We plan to continue to iterate on both more high quality data, and new data filtering techniques to eliminate lower quality data going forward.
|
163 |
+
|
164 |
+
## Model Usage
|
165 |
+
The model is available for download on Hugging Face. It is suitable for a wide range of language tasks, from generating creative text to understanding and following complex instructions.
|
166 |
+
|
167 |
+
[<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OpenAccess-AI-Collective/axolotl/main/image/axolotl-badge-web.png" alt="Built with Axolotl" width="200" height="32"/>](https://github.com/OpenAccess-AI-Collective/axolotl)
|