Datasets:

AdaptLLM

/

finance-tasks

like 69

notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) cash flows for 2010, we expect to contribute $25.2 and $9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans, respectively. a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k. pension plan. additionally, we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k. pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010. as a result, we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years. during 2009, we contributed $31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible. the following estimated future benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid in the years indicated below. domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans. years | domestic pension plans | foreign pension plans | postretirement benefit plans 2010 | $17.2 | $23.5 | $5.8 2011 | 11.1 | 24.7 | 5.7 2012 | 10.8 | 26.4 | 5.7 2013 | 10.5 | 28.2 | 5.6 2014 | 10.5 | 32.4 | 5.5 2015 2013 2019 | 48.5 | 175.3 | 24.8 the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug, improvement and modernization act of 2003. federal subsidies are estimated to range from $0.5 in 2010 to $0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $2.4 for the period 2015-2019. savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans (the 201csavings plans 201d) that cover substantially all domestic employees. the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives. we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service. amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $35.1, $29.6 and $31.4, respectively. expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $3.8, $4.0 and $4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $2.7, $7.8, $6.0 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. in addition, we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $25.0, $28.7 and $26.7 to these plans in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which (i) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation, or (ii) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account. the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions, such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination. as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, the deferred compensation liability balance was $100.3 and $107.6, respectively. amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $11.6, $5.7 and $11.9, respectively. we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment, payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated. the deferred benefit liability was $178.2 and $182.1 as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $12.0, $14.9 and $15.5, respectively. we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities. as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, the cash surrender value of these policies was $119.4 and $100.2, respectively. in addition to the life insurance policies, certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities. these investments, along with the life insurance policies, are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit. how much was contributed to defined contribution plans for foreign countries in 2008? 28.7 how much was contributed in 2007? 26.7 what is the difference? 2.0 what was the 2007 value?

26.7

impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31:. (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 fair value | $99832 | $81881 amortized cost | 100013 | 82329 net unrealized loss pre-tax | $-181 (181) | $-448 (448) net unrealized loss after-tax | $-113 (113) | $-270 (270) the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $303 million, or $189 million after-tax, and $523 million, or $317 million after-tax, as of december 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, or oci. refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8. the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31, 2010 to december 31, 2011 resulted primarily from amortization. we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified, the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component. the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income, and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security. our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation, more fully described in note 3, of economic and security-specific factors. such factors are based on estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations, other-than-temporary impairment could increase, in particular, the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income. given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio, particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities, to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks, the performance of the u.s. housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance. as such, our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices. generally, indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears. as of september 30, 2011, national housing prices, according to the case-shiller national home price index, had declined by approximately 31.3% (31.3%) peak-to-current. overall, management 2019s expectation, for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31, 2011, was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% (35%) peak-to-trough. the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate. in addition, management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above. the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations. our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses. ultimately, other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security. in addition, we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s. residential mortgage-backed portfolio. we estimate, for example, that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $10 million to $50 million, if national housing prices were to decline by 37% (37%) to 39% (39%) peak-to-trough, compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% (35%) described above. this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults. to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations, resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated. excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining. what was the fair value in 2011? 99832.0 what was it in 2010? 81881.0 what is the net change? 17951.0 what is the net change over the 2010 value?

0.21923

abiomed, inc. and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) note 14. income taxes (continued) on april 1, 2007, the company adopted financial interpretation fin no. 48, accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no. 109 (201cfin no. 48 201d), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no. 109, accounting for income taxes. fin no. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. fin no. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized. as a result of its adoption of fin no. 48, the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1, 2007. this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005. the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan, which it completed in fiscal year 2009. the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations. as of march 31, 2009, the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31, 2008. as such, the company had no fin no. 48 liability at march 31, 2009. on a quarterly basis, the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest. it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months; however, it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position. a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31, 2009 (in thousands) is as follows:. balance at march 31 2008 | $168 reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations | -168 (168) balance at march 31 2009 | $2014 the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s. federal income tax, as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981. all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions, including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts. however, since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income, those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized. note 15. commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows: 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device, a payment of $5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device, a payment of $5583333, and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide, a payment of $5583334. the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31, 2009. in april 2009, the company received fda 510 (k) clearance of its impella 5.0 product, triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device. in may 2009, the company paid $1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock.. what was the contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders if impella 2.5 and impella 5.0 are approved? 11166666.0 and the payment amount if impella 2019s worldwide are approved? 5583334.0 combined, what would be paid to former shareholders if all targets are achieved?

16750000.0

notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) cash flows for 2010, we expect to contribute $25.2 and $9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans, respectively. a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k. pension plan. additionally, we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k. pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010. as a result, we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years. during 2009, we contributed $31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible. the following estimated future benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid in the years indicated below. domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans. years | domestic pension plans | foreign pension plans | postretirement benefit plans 2010 | $17.2 | $23.5 | $5.8 2011 | 11.1 | 24.7 | 5.7 2012 | 10.8 | 26.4 | 5.7 2013 | 10.5 | 28.2 | 5.6 2014 | 10.5 | 32.4 | 5.5 2015 2013 2019 | 48.5 | 175.3 | 24.8 the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug, improvement and modernization act of 2003. federal subsidies are estimated to range from $0.5 in 2010 to $0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $2.4 for the period 2015-2019. savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans (the 201csavings plans 201d) that cover substantially all domestic employees. the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives. we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service. amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $35.1, $29.6 and $31.4, respectively. expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $3.8, $4.0 and $4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $2.7, $7.8, $6.0 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. in addition, we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $25.0, $28.7 and $26.7 to these plans in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which (i) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation, or (ii) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account. the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions, such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination. as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, the deferred compensation liability balance was $100.3 and $107.6, respectively. amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $11.6, $5.7 and $11.9, respectively. we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment, payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated. the deferred benefit liability was $178.2 and $182.1 as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $12.0, $14.9 and $15.5, respectively. we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities. as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, the cash surrender value of these policies was $119.4 and $100.2, respectively. in addition to the life insurance policies, certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities. these investments, along with the life insurance policies, are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit. what is the ratio of discretionary company contributions to total expensed amounts for savings plans in 2009? 0.10826 what is that times 100?

10.82621

we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements, and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities. cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012. cash flowsmillions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 cash provided by operating activities | $7385 | $6823 | $6161 cash used in investing activities | -4249 (4249) | -3405 (3405) | -3633 (3633) cash used in financing activities | -2982 (2982) | -3049 (3049) | -2682 (2682) net change in cash and cashequivalents | $154 | $369 | $-154 (154) operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013, despite higher income tax payments. 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income, but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation (discussed below). higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012. in addition, we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations, which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012. lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation (as discussed below) partially offset the increases. federal tax law provided for 100% (100%) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% (50%) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013. as a result, the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense, contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years. congress extended 50% (50%) bonus depreciation for 2014, but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014. investing activities higher capital investments, including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $261 million, drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013. significant investments also were made for new locomotives, freight cars and containers, and capacity and commercial facility projects. capital investments in 2014 also included $99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases, which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012. included in capital investments in 2012 was $75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012, which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions.. what was the cash provided by operating activities in 2013? 6823.0 and in 2012? 6161.0 so what was the difference in this value between the years? 662.0 and the value for 2012 again? 6161.0 so what was the percentage change during this time?

0.10745

net revenues include $3.8 billion in 2017 and $739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps, mainly driven by japan. these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers. excluding excise taxes, net revenues for rrps were $3.6 billion in 2017 and $733 million in 2016. in some jurisdictions, including japan, we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes. in 2017, approximately $0.9 billion of our $3.6 billion in rrp net revenues, excluding excise taxes, were from iqos devices and accessories. excise taxes on products increased by $1.1 billion, due to: 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ($4.6 billion), partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ($1.9 billion) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ($1.6 billion). our cost of sales; marketing, administration and research costs; and operating income were as follows: for the years ended december 31, variance. (in millions) | for the years ended december 31, 2017 | for the years ended december 31, 2016 | for the years ended december 31, $|% (%) cost of sales | $10432 | $9391 | $1041 | 11.1% (11.1%) marketing administration and research costs | 6725 | 6405 | 320 | 5.0% (5.0%) operating income | 11503 | 10815 | 688 | 6.4% (6.4%) cost of sales increased by $1.0 billion, due to: 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ($1.1 billion), partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ($36 million) and 2022 favorable currency ($30 million). marketing, administration and research costs increased by $320 million, due to: 2022 higher expenses ($570 million, largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products, predominately in the european union and asia), partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ($250 million). operating income increased by $688 million, due primarily to: 2022 price increases ($1.4 billion), partly offset by 2022 higher marketing, administration and research costs ($570 million) and 2022 unfavorable currency ($157 million). interest expense, net, of $914 million increased by $23 million, due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels, partly offset by higher interest income. our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% (40.7%). the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act. for further details, see item 8, note 11. income taxes to our consolidated financial statements. we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability. based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act, we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% (28%), subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction. we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world, and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties. an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time. net earnings attributable to pmi of $6.0 billion decreased by $932 million (13.4% (13.4%)). this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above, partly offset by higher operating income. diluted and basic eps of $3.88 decreased by 13.4% (13.4%). excluding. what was, in millions, the operating income in 2017?

11503.0

are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.2 billion for 2011, $2.0 billion for 2010, and $1.9 billion for 2009. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 12. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions 2011 2010. millions | dec. 31 2011 | dec. 31 2010 accounts payable | $819 | $677 income and other taxes | 482 | 337 accrued wages and vacation | 363 | 357 dividends payable | 284 | 183 accrued casualty costs | 249 | 325 interest payable | 197 | 200 equipment rents payable | 90 | 86 other | 624 | 548 total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities | $3108 | $2713 13. financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices. we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception, as well as our risk- management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions, and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings. we may use swaps, collars, futures, and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices; however, the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements. market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item. we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments, which is minimal, by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements. at december 31, 2011 and 2010, we were not required to provide collateral, nor had we received collateral, relating to our hedging activities. determination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows. interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period. we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings. we employ derivatives, primarily swaps, as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix. in addition, we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities. swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates. we account for swaps as fair value. what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2011?

2200.0

entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (a) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds, certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds. (b) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1, 2005 and can then be remarketed. (c) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1, 2004 and can then be remarketed. (d) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1, 2003. entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders, pursuant to the mandatory tender provision, and has not remarketed the bonds at this time. entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds. (e) on june 1, 2002, entergy louisiana remarketed $55 million st. charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030, resetting the interest rate to 4.9% (4.9%) through may 2005. (f) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1, 2005 and can then be remarketed. (g) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982, entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service. the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7, 1983. entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee, plus accrued interest, in long-term (h) the fair value excludes lease obligations, long-term doe obligations, and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year. it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations) for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2003, for the next five years are as follows:. - | (in thousands) 2004 | $503215 2005 | $462420 2006 | $75896 2007 | $624539 2008 | $941625 in november 2000, entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001, and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above. in july 2003, a payment of $102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa. under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes, if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness, entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit. covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% (65%) or less of its total capitalization. if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit, or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur.. what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005? 965635.0 what is the value for 2006? 75896.0 what is the total sum including all 3 years?

1041531.0

credit facility, which was amended in 2013 and 2012. in march 2014, the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019. the amount of the aggregate commitment is $3.990 billion (the 201c2014 credit facility 201d). the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $1.0 billion of borrowing capacity, subject to lender credit approval, increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4.990 billion. interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread. the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio (ratio of net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash) of 3 to 1, which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31, 2014. the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity, funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities. at december 31, 2014, the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility. commercial paper program. on october 14, 2009, blackrock established a commercial paper program (the 201ccp program 201d) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the 201ccp notes 201d) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $3.0 billion. blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $3.5 billion in 2011 and to $3.785 billion in 2012. in april 2013, blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $3.990 billion. the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility. at december 31, 2014, blackrock had no cp notes outstanding. long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31, 2014 included the following: (in millions) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value. (in millions) | maturity amount | unamortized discount | carrying value | fair value 1.375% (1.375%) notes due 2015 | $750 | $2014 | $750 | $753 6.25% (6.25%) notes due 2017 | 700 | -1 (1) | 699 | 785 5.00% (5.00%) notes due 2019 | 1000 | -2 (2) | 998 | 1134 4.25% (4.25%) notes due 2021 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 825 3.375% (3.375%) notes due 2022 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 783 3.50% (3.50%) notes due 2024 | 1000 | -3 (3) | 997 | 1029 total long-term borrowings | $4950 | $-12 (12) | $4938 | $5309 long-term borrowings at december 31, 2013 had a carrying value of $4.939 billion and a fair value of $5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013. 2024 notes. in march 2014, the company issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% (3.50%) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18, 2024 (the 201c2024 notes 201d). the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year, or approximately $35 million per year. the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $6 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes. at december 31, 2014, $6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2015 and 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes maturing in june 2015 (the 201c2015 notes 201d) and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $10 million and $25 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year, which commenced december 1, 2012. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes. at december 31, 2014, $4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes (201c2013 floating rate notes 201d), which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. (201cmerrill lynch 201d). interest. what's the portion of fair value to carrying value? 1.07513 so what percentage higher is fair value than carrying value? 0.07513 what is the fair value of all notes due in 2015 and 2017?

1538.0

amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015. see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage, partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales. the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects, primarily in the chemicals industry, and increased demand from new customers, primarily in the industrial gases industry. the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc. the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike. see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing. included in other is a provision of $23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding, offset by a provision of $32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding. a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding. entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015. amount (in millions). - | amount (in millions) 2015 net revenue | $1666 nuclear realized price changes | -149 (149) rhode island state energy center | -44 (44) nuclear volume | -36 (36) fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement | 41 nuclear fuel expenses | 68 other | -4 (4) 2016 net revenue | $1542 as shown in the table above, net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $124 million in 2016 primarily due to: 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices, the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa, and vermont yankee capacity revenue. the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015. see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015. see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis. what was the 2016 net revenue?

1542.0

performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock, which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31, 2018, with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31, 2017. the graph and table assume that $100 was invested on december 31, 2012 in citi 2019s common stock, the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index, and that all dividends were reinvested. comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials. date | citi | s&p 500 | s&p financials 31-dec-2012 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 31-dec-2013 | 131.8 | 132.4 | 135.6 31-dec-2014 | 137.0 | 150.5 | 156.2 31-dec-2015 | 131.4 | 152.6 | 153.9 31-dec-2016 | 152.3 | 170.8 | 188.9 31-dec-2017 | 193.5 | 208.1 | 230.9 . what is the value of citi common stock in 2017 less an initial $100 investment? 93.5 what is that divided by 100?

0.935

stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on december 29, 2007 and tracks it through december 29, 2012. comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems, inc., the nasdaq composite index, and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems, inc. nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index, including reinvestment of dividends. indexes calculated on month-end basis. copyright a9 2013 s&p, a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved.. - | 12/29/2007 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012 cadence design systems inc. | 100.00 | 22.55 | 35.17 | 48.50 | 61.07 | 78.92 nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 59.03 | 82.25 | 97.32 | 98.63 | 110.78 s&p 400 information technology | 100.00 | 54.60 | 82.76 | 108.11 | 95.48 | 109.88 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. what is the difference of the price of cadence design from 2007 to 2012? -21.08 what is that divided by 100?

-0.2108

(in millions) 2010 2009 2008. (in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 net cash provided by operating activities | $3547 | $3173 | $4421 net cash used for investing activities | -319 (319) | -1518 (1518) | -907 (907) net cash used for financing activities | -3363 (3363) | -1476 (1476) | -3938 (3938) operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $374 million to $3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009. the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $570 million as discussed below, and $187 million related to lower net income tax payments, as compared to 2009. partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan. this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $758 million as compared to 2009, partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts. operating working capital accounts consists of receivables, inventories, accounts payable, and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred. the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009, and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009. these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009. the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems, is&gs, and space systems business areas. the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics, partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems. the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments. net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $1248 million to $3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008. the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $147 million. partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $319 million. the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics, which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities. investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments. we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure. capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment amounted to $820 million in 2010, $852 million in 2009, and $926 million in 2008. we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years. acquisitions, divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates. amounts paid in 2010 of $148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates. we paid $435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities, compared with $233 million in 2008. in 2010, we received proceeds of $798 million from the sale of eig, net of $17 million in transaction costs (see note 2). there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008. during 2010, we increased our short-term investments by $171 million compared to an increase of $279 million in 2009. financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010, 2009, and 2008, we repurchased 33.0 million, 24.9 million, and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $2483 million, $1851 million, and $2931 million. of the shares we repurchased in 2010, 0.9 million shares for $63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011. in october 2010, our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time, up to an authorized amount of $3.0 billion (see note 12). under the program, we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation. we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $776 million, and as of december 31, 2010, there remained $2224 million available for additional share repurchases. in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program, our board terminated our previous share repurchase program. cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $59 million, $40 million, and $250 million. those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares, 1.0 million shares, and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods.. what is the net cash from operating and investing activities? 3228.0 what is the net cash from financing activities? -3363.0 what is the total net cash flow?

-135.0

part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange (201cnyse 201d) for the years 2010 and 2009.. 2010 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $44.61 | $40.10 quarter ended june 30 | 45.33 | 38.86 quarter ended september 30 | 52.11 | 43.70 quarter ended december 31 | 53.14 | 49.61 2009 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $32.53 | $25.45 quarter ended june 30 | 34.52 | 27.93 quarter ended september 30 | 37.71 | 29.89 quarter ended december 31 | 43.84 | 35.03 on february 11, 2011, the closing price of our common stock was $56.73 per share as reported on the nyse. as of february 11, 2011, we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders. dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock. payment of dividends in the future, when, as and if authorized by our board of directors, would depend upon many factors, including our earnings and financial condition, restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements, our debt service requirements, our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time, including the potential determination to elect reit status. in addition, the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied. for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan, our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization, see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.. what was the closing price of common stock as of 2/11/11? 56.73 and the high price for the quarter ended 12/31/10? 53.14 and the difference between these two prices? 3.59 so what was the growth rate during this time?

0.06756

jpmorgan chase & co./2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31, 2007. factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion. for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations, see pages 96 201398 of this annual report. revenue. year ended december 31 (in millions) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 investment banking fees | $6635 | $5520 | $4088 principal transactions | 9015 | 10778 | 8072 lending & deposit-related fees | 3938 | 3468 | 3389 asset management administration and commissions | 14356 | 11855 | 9988 securities gains (losses) | 164 | -543 (543) | -1336 (1336) mortgage fees and related income | 2118 | 591 | 1054 credit card income | 6911 | 6913 | 6754 other income | 1829 | 2175 | 2684 noninterest revenue | 44966 | 40757 | 34693 net interest income | 26406 | 21242 | 19555 total net revenue | $71372 | $61999 | $54248 2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $71.4 billion was up $9.4 billion, or 15% (15%), from the prior year. higher net interest income, very strong private equity gains, record asset management, administration and commissions revenue, higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth. these increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue. investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006. record advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results, partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees. for a further discussion of investment banking fees, which are primarily recorded in ib, see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report. principal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains. trading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level, primarily due to markdowns in ib of $1.4 billion (net of hedges) on subprime positions, including subprime cdos, and $1.3 billion (net of fees) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments. also in ib, markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities. equities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products. ib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year, primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities. the increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains, the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 (201cfair value measurements 201d). for a further discussion of principal transactions revenue, see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360, respectively, and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report. lending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level, driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction. for a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees, which are mostly recorded in rfs, tss and cb, see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348, the tss segment results on pages 54 201355, and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report. asset management, administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006. increased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results. the 18% (18%) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments: institutional, retail, private bank and private client services. tss also contributed to the rise in asset management, administration and commissions revenue, driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody. finally, commissions revenue increased, due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume (primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib), which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities. for additional information on these fees and commissions, see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342, rfs on pages 43 201348, tss on pages 54 201355, and am on pages 56 201358, of this annual report. the favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio. also contributing to the positive variance was a $234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares. for a fur- ther discussion of securities gains (losses), which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business, see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report. consol idated results of operat ions. what were investment banking fees in 2007? 6635.0 what were they in 2006?

5520.0

investing activities for the year ended 30 september 2014, cash used for investing activities was $1638.0, primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment. for the year ended 30 september 2013, cash used for investing activities was $1697.0, primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions. for the year ended 30 september 2012, cash used for investing activities was $2435.2, primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment, acquisitions, and investments in unconsolidated affiliates. refer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail. capital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table:. - | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 additions to plant and equipment | $1684.2 | $1524.2 | $1521.0 acquisitions less cash acquired | 2014 | 224.9 | 863.4 investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates | -2.0 (2.0) | -1.3 (1.3) | 175.4 capital expenditures on a gaap basis | $1682.2 | $1747.8 | $2559.8 capital lease expenditures (a) | 202.4 | 234.9 | 212.2 purchase of noncontrolling interests in asubsidiary (a) |.5 | 14.0 | 6.3 capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis | $1885.1 | $1996.7 | $2778.3 (a) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests. certain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases, and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities, if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease. additionally, the payment for subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. the presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures. capital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2014 totaled $1682.2, compared to $1747.8 in 2013. the decrease of $65.6 was primarily due to the acquisitions in 2013. additions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses. additions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine, ongoing nature, including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements. spending in 2014 and 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china, hydrogen to the global market, and renewable energy in the u.k. in 2013, we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use, net of cash acquired, of $224.9. in the fourth quarter, we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang, china. during the third quarter, we acquired epco, the largest independent u.s. producer of liquid carbon dioxide (co2), and wcg. in 2012, we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a. for $690 and e.i. dupont de nemours and co., inc. 2019s 50% (50%) interest in our joint venture, da nanomaterials for $147. we also purchased a 25% (25%) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co. ltd. (ahg), an unconsolidated affiliate, for $155. refer to note 5, business combinations, and note 7, summarized financial information of equity affiliates, to the consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding the acquisitions and the investments. capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2014 totaled $1885.1 compared to $1996.7 in 2013. capital lease expenditures of $202.4 decreased by $32.5, reflecting lower project spending. 2015 outlook excluding acquisitions, capital expenditures for new plant and equipment in 2015 on a gaap basis are expected to be between $1650 and $1800, and on a non-gaap basis are expected to be between $1700 and $1900. the non-gaap capital expenditures include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases, which are expected to be between $50 and $100. a majority of the total capital expenditures is expected to be for new plants. it is anticipated that capital expenditures will be funded principally with cash from continuing operations. in addition, we intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and investments in equity affiliates. financing activities for the year ended 2014, cash used by financing activities was $504.3 primarily attributable to cash used to pay dividends of $627.7, which was partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises of $141.6. our borrowings (short- and long-term proceeds, net of repayments) were a net source of cash (issuance) of $1.1 and included $148.7 of net commercial paper and other short-term debt issuances, debt proceeds from the issuance of a. what were the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2012?

2778.3

divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses, and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products, which, in aggregate, decreased sales by two percent. net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products, paints and other coating products and builders' hardware. net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows, and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products. net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products. our gross profit margins were 32.2 percent, 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. the 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs, the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler, an increase in other expenses (such as logistics costs and salaries) and unfavorable sales mix. these negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices, the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives, and increased sales volume. the 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume, a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs, and cost savings initiatives. selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016. the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of sales, was driven by leverage of fixed expenses, due primarily to increased sales volume, and improved cost control. the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit, as adjusted to exclude certain items, dollars in millions:. - | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 operating profit as reported | $1211 | $1194 | $1087 rationalization charges | 14 | 4 | 22 kichler inventory step up adjustment | 40 | 2014 | 2014 operating profit as adjusted | $1265 | $1198 | $1109 operating profit margins as reported | 14.5% (14.5%) | 15.6% (15.6%) | 14.8% (14.8%) operating profit margins as adjusted | 15.1% (15.1%) | 15.7% (15.7%) | 15.1% (15.1%) operating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs, the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses (such as logistics costs, salaries and erp costs). these negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices, benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume. operating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume, cost savings initiatives, and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs. operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses, including stock-based compensation, health insurance costs, trade show costs and increased head count. due to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china, and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019, we could be exposed to approximately $150 million of potential annual direct cost increases. we will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases, supplier negotiations, supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures. other income (expense), net other, net, for 2018 included $14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $8 million of realized foreign currency losses. these expenses were partially offset by $3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $1 million related to distributions from private equity funds. other, net, for 2017 included $26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs, $13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund, partially offset by $3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $1 million of earnings related to equity method investments.. what was reporting operating profit in 2018? 1211.0 what was it in 2017? 1194.0 what is the net change? 17.0 what is the percent change?

0.01424

abiomed, inc. and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) note 14. income taxes (continued) on april 1, 2007, the company adopted financial interpretation fin no. 48, accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no. 109 (201cfin no. 48 201d), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no. 109, accounting for income taxes. fin no. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. fin no. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized. as a result of its adoption of fin no. 48, the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1, 2007. this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005. the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan, which it completed in fiscal year 2009. the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations. as of march 31, 2009, the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31, 2008. as such, the company had no fin no. 48 liability at march 31, 2009. on a quarterly basis, the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest. it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months; however, it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position. a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31, 2009 (in thousands) is as follows:. balance at march 31 2008 | $168 reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations | -168 (168) balance at march 31 2009 | $2014 the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s. federal income tax, as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981. all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions, including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts. however, since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income, those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized. note 15. commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows: 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device, a payment of $5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device, a payment of $5583333, and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide, a payment of $5583334. the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31, 2009. in april 2009, the company received fda 510 (k) clearance of its impella 5.0 product, triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device. in may 2009, the company paid $1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock.. what was the total of contingent payments related to impella? 16750002.0 and concerning the state tax settlement, what was its total due payment, in millions?

168.0

the company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $184.1 million. in 2015, the company recorded $102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities, $45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities. in 2014, net realized capital gains were $84.0 million due to $121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities, partially offset by $39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities. in 2013, net realized capital gains were $300.2 million due to $258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities, partially offset by $1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities. the company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $17.7 billion at december 31, 2015, which consisted of 87.4% (87.4%) fixed maturities and cash, of which 91.4% (91.4%) were investment grade; 8.2% (8.2%) equity securities and 4.4% (4.4%) other invested assets. the average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31, 2015, and their overall duration was 3.0 years. as of december 31, 2015, the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments (other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8, 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments, except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized. the company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities (201ccmbs 201d) with a book value of $264.9 million and a market value of $266.3 million. cmbs securities comprising more than 70% (70%) of the december 31, 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc (201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d). furthermore, securities comprising more than 90% (90%) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s. the following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated:. (dollars in millions) | december 31, average investments (1) | december 31, pre-tax investment income (2) | december 31, pre-tax effective yield | december 31, pre-tax realized net capital (losses) gains (3) | december 31, pre-tax unrealized net capital gains (losses) 2015 | $17430.8 | $473.8 | 2.72% (2.72%) | $-184.1 (184.1) | $-194.0 (194.0) 2014 | 16831.9 | 530.6 | 3.15% (3.15%) | 84.0 | 20.3 2013 | 16472.5 | 548.5 | 3.33% (3.33%) | 300.2 | -467.2 (467.2) 2012 | 16220.9 | 600.2 | 3.70% (3.70%) | 164.4 | 161.0 2011 | 15680.9 | 620.0 | 3.95% (3.95%) | 6.9 | 106.6 pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital (losses) capital gains (dollars in millions) investments (1) income (2) yield gains (3) (losses) 17430.8$473.8$2.72% (2.72%) (184.1) $(194.0) $16831.9 530.6 3.15% (3.15%) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% (3.33%) 300.2 (467.2) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% (3.70%) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% (3.95%) 6.9 106.6 (1) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash, less net funds held, future policy benefit reserve, and non-interest bearing cash. bonds, common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value. common stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value. (2) after investment expenses, excluding realized net capital gains (losses). (3) included in 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ($45.6) million, $121.7 million, $258.9 million, $118.1 million and ($4.4) million, respectively.. what was the change in the investment income from 2011 to 2012? -19.8 and how much does this change represent in relation to that income in 2011, in percentage?

-0.03194

transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses. these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions. the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows; however, there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond. asset sales during 2003, we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries. this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity. the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003. sales proceeds project name date completed (in millions) location. project name | date completed | sales proceeds (in millions) | location cilcorp/medina valley | january 2003 | $495 | united states aes ecogen/aes mt. stuart | january 2003 | $59 | australia mountainview | march 2003 | $30 | united states kelvin | march 2003 | $29 | south africa songas | april 2003 | $94 | tanzania aes barry limited | july 2003 | a340/$62 | united kingdom aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd | december 2003 | $145 | bangladesh aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi | august 2003 | $23 | republic of georgia medway power limited/aes medway operations limited | november 2003 | a347/$78 | united kingdom aes oasis limited | december 2003 | $150 | pakistan/oman the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future. however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet. for any sales that happen in the future, there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries. depending on which businesses are eventually sold, the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations. furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve. subsidiary restructuring during 2003, we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses. the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities. businesses impacted include eletropaulo, tiete, uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile. brazil eletropaulo. aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998, when the company was privatized. in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it. aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo, including both common and preferred shares, through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 (2018 2018bndes 2019 2019), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a. (2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019), to aes 2019s subsidiaries, aes elpa s.a. (2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019) and aes transgas empreendimentos, s.a. (2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019).. what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia? 168.0 including november of that year, what then becomes that total?

246.0

annual report 2013 duke realty corporation 37 in addition to the capitalization of overhead costs discussed above, we also capitalized $16.8 million, $9.4 million and $4.3 million of interest costs in the years ended december 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment (in thousands):. - | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 industrial | $41971 | $33095 | $34872 office | 46600 | 30092 | 63933 medical office | 3106 | 641 | 410 non-reportable rental operations segments | 121 | 56 | 49 total | $91798 | $63884 | $99264 both our first and second generation expenditures vary significantly between leases on a per square foot basis, dependent upon several factors including the product type, the nature of a tenant's operations, the specific physical characteristics of each individual property as well as the market in which the property is located. second generation expenditures related to the 79 suburban office buildings that were sold in the blackstone office disposition totaled $26.2 million in 2011. dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "code"), in order to maintain our reit status. we paid dividends of $0.68 per common share for each of the years ended december 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings, to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status, and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors. distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution, our financial condition, capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. at december 31, 2013 we had three series of preferred stock outstanding. the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% (6.5%) and 6.625% (6.625%) and are paid quarterly in arrears. in february 2013, we redeemed all of our outstanding series o shares for a total payment of $178.0 million, thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $3.7 million. in march 2012, we redeemed all of our 6.950% (6.950%) series m cumulative redeemable preferred shares ("series m shares") for a total payment of $168.3 million, thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $2.9 million. in july 2011, we redeemed all of our 7.25% (7.25%) series n cumulative redeemable preferred shares ("series n shares") for a total payment of $108.6 million, thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $2.0 million. debt maturities debt outstanding at december 31, 2013 had a face value totaling $4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.49% (5.49%) and with maturity dates ranging between 2014 and 2028. of this total amount, we had $3.1 billion of unsecured debt, $1.1 billion of secured debt and $88.0 million outstanding on the drlp unsecured line of credit at december 31, 2013. we made scheduled and unscheduled principal payments of $1.0 billion on outstanding debt during the year ended december 31, 2013.. what was the percentage of the total second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment that was office related in 2012? 0.47104 what was the percent of the debt maturities outstanding at 12/31/12 that was unsecured debt?

0.72093

we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements, and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities. cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012. cash flowsmillions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 cash provided by operating activities | $7385 | $6823 | $6161 cash used in investing activities | -4249 (4249) | -3405 (3405) | -3633 (3633) cash used in financing activities | -2982 (2982) | -3049 (3049) | -2682 (2682) net change in cash and cashequivalents | $154 | $369 | $-154 (154) operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013, despite higher income tax payments. 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income, but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation (discussed below). higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012. in addition, we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations, which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012. lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation (as discussed below) partially offset the increases. federal tax law provided for 100% (100%) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% (50%) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013. as a result, the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense, contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years. congress extended 50% (50%) bonus depreciation for 2014, but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014. investing activities higher capital investments, including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $261 million, drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013. significant investments also were made for new locomotives, freight cars and containers, and capacity and commercial facility projects. capital investments in 2014 also included $99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases, which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012. included in capital investments in 2012 was $75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012, which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions.. what was the value included in the capital investments for buyout of locomotives in 2012, in dollars? 75000000.0 and how many locomotives were bought with that value? 165.0 what was, then, the average cost of each one of those locomotives?

454545.45455

n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 (continued) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years. for the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares, 1230881 shares, and 638401 shares, respectively. 19. related party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda. the trustees are principally comprised of ace management. the company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda, the balance of which was $30 million and $31 million, at december 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. the receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. the borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate, some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent, professional real estate appraisers. the borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities. accordingly, the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan, including the real estate properties. 20. statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate. these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions, such as loans or cash advances, available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities. there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries. the company 2019s u.s. subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators. statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts, investments, subsidiaries, acquis- ition expenses, fixed assets, deferred income taxes, and certain other items. the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s. subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010, 2009, and 2008. the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011, without prior approval from the state insurance departments, totals $850 million. the following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s. subsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008.. (in millions of u.s. dollars) | bermuda subsidiaries 2010 | bermuda subsidiaries 2009 | bermuda subsidiaries 2008 | bermuda subsidiaries 2010 | bermuda subsidiaries 2009 | 2008 statutory capital and surplus | $11798 | $9164 | $6205 | $6266 | $5885 | $5368 statutory net income | $2430 | $2369 | $2196 | $1047 | $904 | $818 as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7, certain of the company 2019s u.s. subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities, which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $206 million, $215 million, and $211 million at december 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations. some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements. in some countries, the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business. these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests. jurisdictions may impose fines, censure, and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements.. what was the amount of statutory capital and surplus for bermuda subsidiaries in 2010? 11798.0 and what was it in 2009? 9164.0 by how much, then, did it increase over the year?

2634.0

the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004. millions of dollars | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 track | $1487 | $1472 | $1328 capacity and commercial facilities | 510 | 509 | 347 locomotives and freight cars | 135 | 98 | 125 other | 110 | 90 | 76 total | $2242 | $2169 | $1876 in 2007, we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $3.2 billion, which may include long- term leases. these investments will be used to maintain track and structures, continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors, remove bottlenecks, upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs, build and improve facilities and terminals, and develop and implement new technologies. we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety, enhance customer service, promote growth, and improve operational fluidity. we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, and cash on hand at december 31, 2006. we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007. for the years ended december 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4, 2.9, and 2.1, respectively. the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income. the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis. earnings represent income from continuing operations, less equity earnings net of distributions, plus fixed charges and income taxes. fixed charges represent interest charges, amortization of debt discount, and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges. see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges. financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31, 2006, we had $2 billion in revolving credit facilities available, including $1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 (collectively, the "facilities"). the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper. neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006. commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers. these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates, plus a spread, depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings. the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio. at december 31, 2006, we were in compliance with these covenants. the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions, credit rating triggers (other than rating-dependent pricing), or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral. in addition to our revolving credit facilities, we had $150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available, including $75 million that expires in march 2007 and $75 million expiring in may 2007. neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31, 2006. we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $75 million lines. dividends 2013 on january 30, 2007, we increased the quarterly dividend to $0.35 per share, payable beginning on april 2, 2007, to shareholders of record on february 28, 2007. we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, and cash on hand at december 31, 2006. dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities. retained earnings available. what was the percentage of the total investments amount attributable to the track in 2006? 0.66325 what was the anticipated change in the capital investment between 2006 and 2007? -2238.8 so what was the anticipated percentage increase?

-0.99857

market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange, symbol dre. the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period. comparable cash dividends are expected in the future. on january 29, 2003, the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $.455 per share, payable on february 28, 2003, to common shareholders of record on february 14, 2003.. quarter ended | 2002 high | 2002 low | 2002 dividend | 2002 high | 2002 low | dividend december 31 | $25.84 | $21.50 | $.455 | $24.80 | $22.00 | $.45 september 30 | 28.88 | 21.40 |.455 | 26.17 | 21.60 |.45 june 30 | 28.95 | 25.46 |.450 | 24.99 | 22.00 |.43 march 31 | 26.50 | 22.92 |.450 | 25.44 | 21.85 |.43 . what was the cash dividend per share in the last quarter of 2002? 0.455 and what was it in the first quarter? 0.45 what was, then, the change in that cash dividend throughout 2002? 0.005 and how much does this change represent in relation in relation to that cash dividend in the first quarter? 0.01111 how much is that in percentage?

1.11111

item 5. market for the registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock, the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index (201cs&p 500 index 201d) and our peer group (201cloews peer group 201d) for the five years ended december 31, 2015. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $100 on december 31, 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested.. - | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 loews common stock | 100.0 | 97.37 | 106.04 | 126.23 | 110.59 | 101.72 s&p 500 index | 100.0 | 102.11 | 118.45 | 156.82 | 178.29 | 180.75 loews peer group (a) | 100.0 | 101.59 | 115.19 | 145.12 | 152.84 | 144.70 (a) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries: ace limited, w.r. berkley corporation, the chubb corporation, energy transfer partners l.p., ensco plc, the hartford financial services group, inc., kinder morgan energy partners, l.p. (included through november 26, 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc.), noble corporation, spectra energy corp, transocean ltd. and the travelers companies, inc. dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967. regular dividends of $0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014.. from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock?

-2.63

edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) 7. acquisitions (continued) was recorded to goodwill. the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in millions):. current assets | $28.1 property and equipment net | 0.2 goodwill | 258.9 ipr&d | 190.0 current liabilities assumed | -32.9 (32.9) deferred income taxes | -66.0 (66.0) contingent consideration | -30.3 (30.3) total cash purchase price | 348.0 less: cash acquired | -27.9 (27.9) total cash purchase price net of cash acquired | $320.1 goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition. goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes. ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods. the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach. this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return. the discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% (16.5%). completion of successful design developments, bench testing, pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product. the risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design, development, and manufacturability of the product, the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies, and the timing of regulatory approvals. the valuation assumed $97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction, and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program. the company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018, if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval. upon completion of development, the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life. the company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve. this testing has been completed and, in collaboration with clinical investigators, the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials. the results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. pro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company. 8. goodwill and other intangible assets on july 3, 2015, the company acquired cardiaq (see note 7). this transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $258.9 million and ipr&d of $190.0 million.. what is the amount of the goodwill?

258.9

entergy new orleans, inc. management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007. amount (in millions). - | amount (in millions) 2007 net revenue | $231.0 volume/weather | 15.5 net gas revenue | 6.6 rider revenue | 3.9 base revenue | -11.3 (11.3) other | 7.0 2008 net revenue | $252.7 the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31, 2008, compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31, 2007. billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007, an increase of 4% (4%). the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007. refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase. the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006. the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account. the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit, effective january 2008. the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to: an increase of $58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales; an increase of $47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage; and an increase of $22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007. fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand.. what is the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008?

21.7

table of contents the estimated amortization expense at september 26, 2015 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years was as follows:. fiscal 2016 | $377.0 fiscal 2017 | $365.6 fiscal 2018 | $355.1 fiscal 2019 | $343.5 fiscal 2020 | $332.3 goodwill in accordance with asc 350, intangibles 2014goodwill and other (asc 350), the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. events that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, current economic and market conditions, including a decline in market capitalization, a significant adverse change in legal factors, business climate, operational performance of the business or key personnel, and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. in performing the impairment test, the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350. the first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value. to estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1, the company primarily utilizes the income approach. the income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. assumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values, growth rates, and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. the forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period, the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date. the company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses. the discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital (201cwacc 201d) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit. the market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (201cebitda 201d) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis. the company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable. if different assumptions were used, particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows, terminal values, waccs, or market multiples, different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result. actual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows. if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value. the implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities. the residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill. to the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded. the company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter, and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28, 2015, and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions. the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue, cost projections, cash flows, market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date. as a result of completing step 1, all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values, and as such, step 2 of the impairment test was not required. for illustrative purposes, had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% (10%), all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. at september 26, 2015, the company believes that each reporting unit, with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion, was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts. the company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter, and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29, 2014, and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions. the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue, cost projections, cash flows, market multiples and discount rates as source: hologic inc, 10-k, november 19, 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. past financial performance is no guarantee of future results.. what was the net change in value of the amortization expense from 2016 to 2017?

-11.4

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) december 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018. aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico. therefore, we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa. starting prior to the hurricanes, prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company, and on july 2, 2017, filed for bankruptcy under title iii. as a result of the bankruptcy filing, aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $365 million and $36 million, respectively, is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31, 2017. in november 2017, aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events. this agreement will expire on march 22, 2018. the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31, 2017 totaled $86 million, of which $53 million was overdue. after the filing of title iii protection, and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes, aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns. considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $627 million is recoverable as of december 31, 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required. foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s. dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows: the argentine peso, the brazilian real, the dominican republic peso, the euro, the chilean peso, the colombian peso, and the philippine peso. concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations, the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply. several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas. however, no single customer accounted for 10% (10%) or more of total revenue in 2017, 2016 or 2015. the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements. if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated, the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms. 26. related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions. in the ordinary course of business, these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions, and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments. at two of our generation businesses in mexico, the offtakers exercise significant influence, but not control, through representation on these businesses' boards of directors. these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses. in chile, we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. additionally, the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements. the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated (in millions):. years ended december 31, | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 revenue 2014non-regulated | $1297 | $1100 | $1099 cost of sales 2014non-regulated | 220 | 210 | 330 interest income | 8 | 4 | 25 interest expense | 36 | 39 | 33 . what was the total of revenues for transactions with related parties in 2017?

1297.0

the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008. in 2007, we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans, after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments. the following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: (in millions) pension benefits benefits. (in millions) | pensionbenefits | otherbenefits 2007 | $1440 | $260 2008 | 1490 | 260 2009 | 1540 | 270 2010 | 1600 | 270 2011 | 1660 | 270 years 2012 2013 2016 | 9530 | 1260 as noted previously, we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits. the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31, 2006 were $641 million. the expense associated with these plans totaled $59 million in 2006, $58 million in 2005 and $61 million in 2004. we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans. the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $310 million, $324 million and $318 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. future minimum lease commitments at december 31, 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $1.1 billion ($288 million in 2007, $254 million in 2008, $211 million in 2009, $153 million in 2010, $118 million in 2011 and $121 million in later years). certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s. government under short-term or cancelable arrangements. note 14 2013 legal proceedings, commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings, including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment. we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole. we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty. these matters include the following items, all of which have been previously reported: on march 27, 2006, we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio. the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology. we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation. on february 6, 2004, we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs (past and future) related to our former facility in redlands, california. we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company (boeing), executed in 2001, in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile (sram) program. the contract for the sram program, which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility, had special contractual indemnities from the u.s. air force, as authorized by public law 85-804. on august 31, 2004, the united states denied the claim. our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals. on august 28, 2003, the department of justice (the doj) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky, united states ex rel. natural resources defense council, et al v. lockheed martin corporation, et al, and united states ex rel. john d. tillson v. lockheed martin energy systems, inc., et al. the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling, storing. what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions? 1.1 what about in millions? 1100.0 what amount is due in 2007? 288.0 what proportion does this represent?

0.26182

we hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $375 million 5.0% (5.0%) senior unsecured notes due july 1, 2014. the effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% (5.0%) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% (2.05%) (2.42% (2.42%) as of october 29, 2011). in addition, we have a term loan facility of $145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% (1.25%) (1.61% (1.61%) as of october 29, 2011). if libor increases by 100 basis points, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $5 million. however, this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $375 million of 3% (3%) fixed-rate debt, which is not hedged. as of october 30, 2010, a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $4 million to our annual interest expense. foreign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k, we regularly hedge our non-u.s. dollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. the terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months. currently, our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro, primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses. relative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29, 2011 and october 30, 2010, a 10% (10%) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows. the market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions, assets and liabilities being hedged. the counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings. based on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29, 2011, we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them. while the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions, they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk. the amounts potentially subject to credit risk (arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties. the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% (10%) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates, relative to the u.s. dollar, would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29, 2011 and october 30, 2010:. - | october 29 2011 | october 30 2010 fair value of forward exchange contracts asset | $2472 | $7256 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% (10%) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset | $17859 | $22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% (10%) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability | $-13332 (13332) | $-7396 (7396) fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% (10%) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset................. $17859 $22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% (10%) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability....................... $(13332) $(7396) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s. dollar. in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates, such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive. our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices.. what is the net change fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011? -4784.0 what percentage change does this represent?

-0.65932

long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31, 2013 included the following: (in millions) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value. (in millions) | maturity amount | unamortized discount | carrying value | fair value 3.50% (3.50%) notes due 2014 | $1000 | $2014 | $1000 | $1029 1.375% (1.375%) notes due 2015 | 750 | 2014 | 750 | 759 6.25% (6.25%) notes due 2017 | 700 | -2 (2) | 698 | 812 5.00% (5.00%) notes due 2019 | 1000 | -2 (2) | 998 | 1140 4.25% (4.25%) notes due 2021 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 799 3.375% (3.375%) notes due 2022 | 750 | -4 (4) | 746 | 745 total long-term borrowings | $4950 | $-11 (11) | $4939 | $5284 long-term borrowings at december 31, 2012 had a carrying value of $5.687 billion and a fair value of $6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012. 2015 and 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes maturing in june 2015 (the 201c2015 notes 201d) and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $10 million and $25 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year, which commenced december 1, 2012. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes. at december 31, 2013, $5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2013 and 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes (201c2013 floating rate notes 201d), which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. (201cmerrill lynch 201d). interest on the 4.25% (4.25%) notes due in 2021 (201c2021 notes 201d) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year, which commenced november 24, 2011, and is approximately $32 million per year. the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs for the $1.5 billion note issuances, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes. at december 31, 2013, $3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. in may 2011, in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes, the company entered into a $750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% (1.03%). during the second quarter of 2013, the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid. 2012, 2014 and 2019 notes. in december 2009, the company issued $2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $0.5 billion of 2.25% (2.25%) notes, which were repaid in december 2012, $1.0 billion of 3.50% (3.50%) notes and $1.0 billion of 5.0% (5.0%) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019, respectively. net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program, which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors (201cbgi 201d) from barclays on december 1, 2009 (the 201cbgi transaction 201d), and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $35 million and $50 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year. these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $5 million, which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes. the company incurred approximately $13 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes. at december 31, 2013, $4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2017 notes. in september 2007, the company issued $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% (6.25%) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15, 2017 (the 201c2017 notes 201d). a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year, or approximately $44 million per year. the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior. what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes? 345.0 and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014? 1000.0 what was it for 2015?

750.0

the analysis of our depreciation studies. changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively. under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using (i) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies. the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. in addition, we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies. any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets. for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies. a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations. when we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. however, many of our assets are self-constructed. a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties, which is typically performed by our employees, and for track line expansion and other capacity projects. costs that are directly attributable to capital projects (including overhead costs) are capitalized. direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset. general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.4 billion for 2014, $2.3 billion for 2013, and $2.1 billion for 2012. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 13. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions 2014 2013. millions | dec. 31 2014 | dec. 312013 accounts payable | $877 | $803 dividends payable | 438 | 356 income and other taxes payable | 412 | 491 accrued wages and vacation | 409 | 385 accrued casualty costs | 249 | 207 interest payable | 178 | 169 equipment rents payable | 100 | 96 other | 640 | 579 total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities | $3303 | $3086 . what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013? 2.3 and in 2012? 2.1 what was the difference between the two values?

0.2

part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information. the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange (nyse) under the symbol 2018 2018aes. 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated. price range of common stock. 2002 first quarter | high $17.84 | low $4.11 | 2001 first quarter | high $60.15 | low $41.30 second quarter | 9.17 | 3.55 | second quarter | 52.25 | 39.95 third quarter | 4.61 | 1.56 | third quarter | 44.50 | 12.00 fourth quarter | 3.57 | 0.95 | fourth quarter | 17.80 | 11.60 holders. as of march 3, 2003, there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock, par value $0.01 per share. dividends. under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate, the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends. in addition, the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met. the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans, governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries. securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1, 2003, which information is incorporated herein by reference.. what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002? 13.73 what was the high price of common stock in the first quarter of 2001? 60.15 and what was the low price?

41.3

december 31, 2011, the company recognized a decrease of $3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $16 million accrued at december 31, 2011. note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices, which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations. management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments, including futures, options, and swaps, where appropriate, to manage these risks. instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract. the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges, fair value hedges, net investment hedges, and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates, foreign currency and commodities. as a matter of policy, the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions. total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28, 2013 and december 29, 2012 were as follows:. (millions) | 2013 | 2012 foreign currency exchange contracts | $517 | $570 interest rate contracts | 2400 | 2150 commodity contracts | 361 | 320 total | $3278 | $3040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28, 2013 and december 29, 2012, measured on a recurring basis. level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. for the company, level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts. level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. for the company, level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts. the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve. over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance, including counterparty credit risk. level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28, 2013 or december 29, 2012.. what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011? 16.0 what was the value decrease during the year? 3.0 what is the sum?

19.0

tissue pulp due to strong market demand, partic- ularly from asia. average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007, principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood, hardwood and fluff pulp. operating earnings in 2007 were $104 mil- lion compared with $48 million in 2006 and $37 mil- lion in 2005. the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy, chemicals and freight. entering the first quarter of 2008, demand for market pulp remains strong, and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly. however, input costs for energy, chemicals and freight are expected to be higher, and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages. industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction, as well as with demand for processed foods, poultry, meat and agricultural products. in addition to prices and volumes, major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs, freight costs, manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix. industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% (6%) to $5.2 billion compared with $4.9 bil- lion in 2006, and 13% (13%) compared with $4.6 billion in 2005. operating profits in 2007 were 26% (26%) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings. bene- fits from improved price realizations ($147 million), sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ($3 million), a more favorable mix ($31 million), strong mill and converting operations ($33 million) and other costs ($47 million) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ($76 million) and higher freight costs ($18 million). in addition, a gain of $13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard. the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related. industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005. in millions | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 sales | $5245 | $4925 | $4625 operating profit | $501 | $399 | $219 north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $3.9 billion, compared with $3.7 billion in 2006 and $3.6 billion in 2005. operating profits in 2007 were $407 million, up from $327 mil- lion in 2006 and $170 million in 2005. containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006, including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007. average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007. margins improved reflecting stronger export demand. manu- facturing performance was strong, although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages. raw material costs for wood, energy, chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly. operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine. u.s. converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand. earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007. favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs. looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008, sales volumes are expected to increase slightly, and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007. however, additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter, and freight and input costs are expected to rise, particularly for wood and energy. manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter. european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $1.1 billion, up from $1.0 billion in 2006 and $880 million in 2005. sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year. operating profits in 2007 were $88 million compared with $69 million in 2006 and $53 million in 2005. sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes. conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs. entering the first quarter of 2008, sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues. profit margins, however, are expected to be somewhat lower.. in the year of 2007, what was the amount of the industrial packaging sales that was from europe, in millions?

1100.0

repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008: number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs. - | total number of shares purchased | average price paid per share2 | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs october 1-31 | 29704 | $5.99 | 2014 | 2014 november 1-30 | 4468 | $3.24 | 2014 | 2014 december 1-31 | 12850 | $3.98 | 2014 | 2014 total1 | 47022 | $5.18 | 2014 | 2014 total1................................ 47022 $5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 (the 201cwithheld shares 201d). 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month.. what is the sum of the average price per share in november and december?

7.22

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007, 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows: program program program total. - | 2007 program | 2003 program | 2001 program | total liability at december 31 2006 | $2014 | $12.6 | $19.2 | $31.8 net charges (reversals) and adjustments | 19.1 | -0.5 (0.5) | -5.2 (5.2) | 13.4 payments and other1 | -7.2 (7.2) | -3.1 (3.1) | -5.3 (5.3) | -15.6 (15.6) liability at december 31 2007 | $11.9 | $9.0 | $8.7 | $29.6 net charges and adjustments | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 5.8 payments and other1 | -15.0 (15.0) | -4.1 (4.1) | -3.5 (3.5) | -22.6 (22.6) liability at december 31 2008 | $1.2 | $5.7 | $5.9 | $12.8 1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates. other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote, cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb. charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs. we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009. charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete. the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business.. what was the total liability by the end of 2008? 29.6 and what was it by the end of 2007? 12.8 what was, then, the change over the year? 16.8 what was the total liability by the end of 2008?

29.6

impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31:. (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 fair value | $99832 | $81881 amortized cost | 100013 | 82329 net unrealized loss pre-tax | $-181 (181) | $-448 (448) net unrealized loss after-tax | $-113 (113) | $-270 (270) the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $303 million, or $189 million after-tax, and $523 million, or $317 million after-tax, as of december 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, or oci. refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8. the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31, 2010 to december 31, 2011 resulted primarily from amortization. we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified, the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component. the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income, and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security. our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation, more fully described in note 3, of economic and security-specific factors. such factors are based on estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations, other-than-temporary impairment could increase, in particular, the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income. given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio, particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities, to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks, the performance of the u.s. housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance. as such, our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices. generally, indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears. as of september 30, 2011, national housing prices, according to the case-shiller national home price index, had declined by approximately 31.3% (31.3%) peak-to-current. overall, management 2019s expectation, for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31, 2011, was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% (35%) peak-to-trough. the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate. in addition, management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above. the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations. our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses. ultimately, other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security. in addition, we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s. residential mortgage-backed portfolio. we estimate, for example, that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $10 million to $50 million, if national housing prices were to decline by 37% (37%) to 39% (39%) peak-to-trough, compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% (35%) described above. this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults. to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations, resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated. excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining. what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?

303.0

south america. approximately 26% (26%) of 2017 net sales were to international markets. this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives, primarily to wholesalers, home centers, mass merchandisers and industrial distributors. in aggregate, sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% (23%) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017. this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta (owned by masco), kohler, pfister (owned by spectrum brands), american standard (owned by lixil group), insinkerator (owned by emerson electronic company) and imported private-label brands. doors. our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand. this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials, such as wood, steel and aluminum, toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials. therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems, primarily for sale in the u.s. and canada. this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers, millwork building products and wholesale distributors, and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market, as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets. in aggregate, sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% (14%) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017. this segment 2019s competitors include masonite, jeld-wen, plastpro and pella. security. our security segment 2019s products consist of locks, safety and security devices, and electronic security products manufactured, sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes, security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured, sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand. this segment sells products principally in the u.s., canada, europe, central america, japan and australia. approximately 25% (25%) of 2017 net sales were to international markets. this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks, bicycle and cable locks, built-in locker locks, door hardware, automotive, trailer and towing locks, electronic access control solutions, and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware, home center and other retail outlets. in addition, the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths, industrial and institutional users, and original equipment manufacturers. in aggregate, sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% (18%) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017. master lock competes with abus, w.h. brady, hampton, kwikset (owned by spectrum brands), schlage (owned by allegion), assa abloy and various imports, and sentrysafe competes with first alert, magnum, fortress, stack-on and fire king. annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows: (in millions) 2017 2016 2015. (in millions) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 cabinets | $2467.1 | $2397.8 | $2173.4 plumbing | 1720.8 | 1534.4 | 1414.5 doors | 502.9 | 473.0 | 439.1 security | 592.5 | 579.7 | 552.4 total | $5283.3 | $4984.9 | $4579.4 for additional financial information for each of our business segments, refer to note 18, 201cinformation on business segments, 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials. the table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments. these materials are available from a number of sources. volatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products.. in the year of 2017, what percentage of the net sales were for international markets? 0.25 and what were those net sales? 5283.3 what, then, was the amount correspondent to that percentage? 1320.825 and from 2016 to that year, what was the increase in the sales of cabinets?

69.3

increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth, higher offer costs and continued investment in presto, partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations. net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above, partially offset by lower income tax expense. (b) other equity affiliates, net for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies, which owns proptiger. interest, net 2014interest, net for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016 decreased $13 million, or 23% (23%), as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility. (see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements). other, net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30. (in millions) | for the fiscal years ended june 30, 2016 | for the fiscal years ended june 30, 2015 gain on iproperty transaction (a) | $29 | $2014 impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments (b) | -21 (21) | -5 (5) gain on sale of marketable securities (c) | 2014 | 29 dividends received from cost method investments | 2014 | 25 gain on sale of cost method investments | 2014 | 15 other | 10 | 11 total other net | $18 | $75 (a) rea group recognized a gain of $29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016. (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). (b) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30, 2016 and 2015. these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery. (see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.) (c) in august 2014, rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $104 million. as a result of the sale, rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $29 million, which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other, net in the statement of operations. income tax benefit (expense) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016 were $54 million and (30% (30%)), respectively, as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $185 million and 34% (34%), respectively, for fiscal 2015. for the fiscal years ended june 30, 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $54 million on pre-tax income of $181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s. statutory tax. the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s. federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets. this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s. taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration. in addition, the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty. for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2015, the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s. statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates, partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions. (see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements).. what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016?

13.0

material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% (1%) change in the assumed health care trend rate. for most of the participants in the u.s. plan, aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% (5%) per annum. because of this cap, net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% (5%) per year in the future. during 2007, aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s. plan over the next three years. the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees. 14. stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits (in millions):. years ended december 31 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 rsus | $138 | $124 | $132 performance plans | 62 | 60 | 67 stock options | 17 | 21 | 24 employee stock purchase plans | 4 | 4 | 3 total stock-based compensation expense | 221 | 209 | 226 tax benefit | 75 | 68 | 82 stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $146 | $141 | $144 during 2009, the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider. in connection with this conversion, a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed, which resulted in a $12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31, 2009. stock awards stock awards, in the form of rsus, are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus. service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant. the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. with certain limited exceptions, any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards. compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period. dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus, based on the initial grant amount. performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees. vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual, divisional or company-wide performance conditions, including revenue generation or growth in revenue, pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period. the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards. the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. compensation expense is recognized over the performance period, and in certain cases an additional vesting period, based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest. compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs. the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% (0-200%) of the number of units granted, based on the plan. dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus. during 2010, the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan (2018 2018lpp 2019 2019) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans. during 2010, 2009 and 2008, the company granted approximately 3.5 million. what was the change in the rsus from 2009 to 2010?

14.0

item 7a. quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk (amounts in millions) in the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates, foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items. from time to time, we use derivative instruments, pursuant to established guidelines and policies, to manage some portion of these risks. derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes. interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations. the majority of our debt (approximately 89% (89%) and 91% (91%) as of december 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively) bears interest at fixed rates. we do have debt with variable interest rates, but a 10% (10%) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows. the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates, and the impact of a 10% (10%) change in interest rates is summarized below. increase/ (decrease) in fair market value as of december 31, 10% (10%) increase in interest rates 10% (10%) decrease in interest rates. as of december 31, | increase/ (decrease) in fair market value 10% (10%) increasein interest rates | increase/ (decrease) in fair market value 10% (10%) decreasein interest rates 2015 | $-33.7 (33.7) | $34.7 2014 | -35.5 (35.5) | 36.6 we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31, 2015. we had $1509.7 of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31, 2015 that we generally invest in conservative, short-term bank deposits or securities. the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements. during 2015 and 2014, we had interest income of $22.8 and $27.4, respectively. based on our 2015 results, a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $15.0, assuming that all cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2015 levels. foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. since we report revenues and expenses in u.s. dollars, changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses (as expressed in u.s. dollars) from foreign operations. the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2015 included the australian dollar, brazilian real, british pound sterling and euro. based on 2015 exchange rates and operating results, if the u.s. dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% (10%), we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% (4%), assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2015 levels. the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency. assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented. the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets. our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency, mitigating transaction risk. however, certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency. assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement. currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses. we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures. we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes.. what is the net change in value of interest income from 2014 to 2015? -4.6 what is that change over the 2014 interest income?

-0.16788

2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales decreased $305 million, or 3% (3%), in 2014 as compared to 2013. net sales decreased by approximately $305 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain c4isr programs (primarily ptds); about $85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries; and about $55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 (including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program). the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume (primarily space fence); and approximately $40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries (primarily close combat tactical trainer). mst 2019s operating profit decreased $129 million, or 12% (12%), in 2014 as compared to 2013. the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 (including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program); approximately $55 million due to the reasons described above for lower c4isr program sales, as well as performance matters on an international program; and approximately $45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs. the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014; and about $60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements (including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs). adjustments not related to volume, including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters, were approximately $85 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the addition of sikorsky backlog, as well as higher orders on new program starts (such as australian defence force pilot training system). backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts (such as space fence). trends we expect mst 2019s 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-double digit percentage range compared to 2015 net sales due to the inclusion of sikorsky programs for a full year, partially offset by a decline in volume due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs. operating profit is expected to be equivalent to 2015 on higher volume, and operating margin is expected to decline due to costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition, including the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, integration costs and inherited restructuring costs associated with actions committed to by sikorsky prior to acquisition. space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development, design, engineering and production of satellites, strategic and defensive missile systems and space transportation systems. space systems provides network-enabled situational awareness and integrates complex global systems to help our customers gather, analyze, and securely distribute critical intelligence data. space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems. space systems 2019 major programs include the trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile (fbm), orion, space based infrared system (sbirs), aehf, gps-iii, geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series (goes-r), and muos. operating profit for our space systems business segment includes our share of earnings for our investment in ula, which provides expendable launch services to the u.s. government. space systems 2019 operating results included the following (in millions):. - | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 net sales | $9105 | $9202 | $9288 operating profit | 1171 | 1187 | 1198 operating margins | 12.9% (12.9%) | 12.9% (12.9%) | 12.9% (12.9%) backlog at year-end | $17400 | $20300 | $21400 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $97 million, or 1% (1%), compared to 2014. the decrease was attributable to approximately $335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume (primarily aehf) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs; and approximately $55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume. these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $235 million for businesses acquired in 2014; and approximately $75 million for the orion program due to increased volume.. what was the average backlog in 2015? 17400.0 what was it in 2014? 20300.0 what is the sum of those years? 37700.0 what was the average backlog in 2013? 21400.0 what is the total sum for all 3 years?

59100.0

market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange, symbol dre. the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period. comparable cash dividends are expected in the future. on january 29, 2003, the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $.455 per share, payable on february 28, 2003, to common shareholders of record on february 14, 2003.. quarter ended | 2002 high | 2002 low | 2002 dividend | 2002 high | 2002 low | dividend december 31 | $25.84 | $21.50 | $.455 | $24.80 | $22.00 | $.45 september 30 | 28.88 | 21.40 |.455 | 26.17 | 21.60 |.45 june 30 | 28.95 | 25.46 |.450 | 24.99 | 22.00 |.43 march 31 | 26.50 | 22.92 |.450 | 25.44 | 21.85 |.43 . what is the net change in the cash dividend for the period ended march 31, 2002 to the period ended march 31, 2003? 0.005 what is that divided by the dividend payment in 2002? 0.01111 what is that by 100?

1.11111

38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1. summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries, inc. (201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d) and all subsidiaries, both u.s. and non-u.s., that it controls. ppg owns more than 50% (50%) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls. for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% (100%), the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests. investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% (20%) to 50% (50%) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. as a result, ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in "investments" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation. use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated. actual outcomes could differ from those estimates. revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete. revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered. shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. selling, general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling, general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling, customer service, distribution and advertising costs, as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance, law, human resources and planning. distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses, terminals and other distribution facilities. advertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $345 million, $288 million and $245 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. research and development research and development costs, which consist primarily of employee related costs, are charged to expense as incurred. the following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31:. (millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 research and development 2013 total | $505 | $468 | $443 less depreciation on research facilities | 17 | 15 | 15 research and development net | $488 | $453 | $428 legal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred. legal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions, general litigation, environmental regulation compliance, patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes. foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s. operations is their local currency. assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s. dollars using year-end exchange rates; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period. unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity. cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments (valued at cost, which approximates fair value) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less. short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid, high credit quality investments (valued at cost plus accrued interest) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year. the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income, net of tax, for those designated as available for sale securities.. what was the difference in research and development net between 2011 and 2012? 25.0 and the specific value for 2011 again?

428.0

part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange (201cnyse 201d) for the years 2008 and 2007.. 2008 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $42.72 | $32.10 quarter ended june 30 | 46.10 | 38.53 quarter ended september 30 | 43.43 | 31.89 quarter ended december 31 | 37.28 | 19.35 2007 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $41.31 | $36.63 quarter ended june 30 | 43.84 | 37.64 quarter ended september 30 | 45.45 | 36.34 quarter ended december 31 | 46.53 | 40.08 on february 13, 2009, the closing price of our common stock was $28.85 per share as reported on the nyse. as of february 13, 2009, we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders. dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock. we anticipate that we may retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. the indentures governing our 7.50% (7.50%) senior notes due 2012 (201c7.50% (201c7.50%) notes 201d) and our 7.125% (7.125%) senior notes due 2012 (201c7.125% (201c7.125%) notes 201d) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants. the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan, and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% (7.50%) notes and 7.125% (7.125%) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied. in addition, while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% (7.50%) notes and 7.125% (7.125%) notes, certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction. for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan, our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction, see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.. what was the price of shares in february of 2009? 37.28 and what was it in by the end of 2008? 28.85 what was, then, the change over that period? 8.43 what was the price of shares in the end of 2008?

28.85

15. debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015: total debt. 30 september | 2016 | 2015 short-term borrowings | $935.8 | $1494.3 current portion of long-term debt | 371.3 | 435.6 long-term debt | 4918.1 | 3949.1 total debt | $6225.2 | $5879.0 short-term borrowings | - | - 30 september | 2016 | 2015 bank obligations | $133.1 | $234.3 commercial paper | 802.7 | 1260.0 total short-term borrowings | $935.8 | $1494.3 the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% (1.1%) and.8% (.8%), respectively. cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was $121.1 in 2016, $97.5 in 2015, and $132.4 in 2014.. what was the total cash paid for interest in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined? 218.6 including the year of 2014, what then becomes this total? 351.0 and what was the average cash paid for interest between those three years?

117.0

62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27, 2012, totaled $73.6 million after tax. these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions. unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27, 2012, were $1.7 million after-tax. the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27, 2012, that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $14.0 million of expense. credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies. if our debt were to fall below investment grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions. the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27, 2012, was $19.9 million. we have posted col- lateral of $4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts. if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27, 2012, we would have been required to post an additional $15.6 million of collateral to counterparties. concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012, wal-mart stores, inc. and its affili- ates (wal-mart) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s. retail segment. no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales. wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment. as of may 27, 2012, wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s. retail receivables, 5 percent of our international receiv- ables, and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables. the five largest customers in our u.s. retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales, the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales, and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales. we enter into interest rate, foreign exchange, and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives, primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties. we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties; however, we have not incurred a material loss. we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges. the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties, should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts, is $19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral. under the terms of master swap agreements, some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk. collateral assets are either cash or u.s. treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults. note 8. debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows:. in millions | may 27 2012 notes payable | may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate | may 27 2012 notespayable | weighted-averageinterest rate u.s. commercial paper | $412.0 | 0.2% (0.2%) | $192.5 | 0.2% (0.2%) financial institutions | 114.5 | 10.0 | 118.8 | 11.5 total | $526.5 | 2.4% (2.4%) | $311.3 | 4.5% (4.5%) to ensure availability of funds, we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings. commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing. we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe. in april 2012, we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines, consisting of a $1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $1.7 billion facility. for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions? 12.636 and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s. commercial paper? 412.0 what was the full total of notes payable?

526.5

page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31, 2010. it assumes $100 was invested on december 31, 2005, and that all dividends were reinvested. the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization. total return analysis. - | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07 | 12/31/08 | 12/31/09 | 12/31/10 ball corporation | $100.00 | $110.86 | $115.36 | $107.58 | $134.96 | $178.93 dj containers & packaging index | $100.00 | $112.09 | $119.63 | $75.00 | $105.34 | $123.56 s&p 500 index | $100.00 | $115.80 | $122.16 | $76.96 | $97.33 | $111.99 copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) | copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) | copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) | copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) | copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) | copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) | copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved. (www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm) copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. | copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. | copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. | copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. | copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. | copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. | copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company. all rights reserved. . what is the price of ball corporation in 2010? 178.93 what is that less an initial $100 investment? 78.93 what is that difference over 100?

0.7893

impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31:. (in millions) | 2009 | 2008 fair value | $72699 | $54163 amortized cost | 74843 | 60786 net unrealized loss pre-tax | $-2144 (2144) | $-6623 (6623) net unrealized loss after-tax | $-1316 (1316) | $-4057 (4057) the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31, 2009 and december 31, 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $1.01 billion, or $635 million after-tax, and $2.27 billion, or $1.39 billion after- tax, respectively, related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income. the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities. we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified, the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component. the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income, and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security (see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8). the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors, which are more fully described in note 3. such factors are based upon estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations, other-than-temporary impairment could increase, in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income. national housing prices, according to the case-shiller national hpi, have declined to date approximately 30% (30%) peak-to-current. management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010, consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% (37%). as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment, if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% (110%) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% (90%) of management 2019s current expectations, credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $120 million to $125 million, which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income. excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities. additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8.. what is the net change of securities between 2008 and 2009?

18536.0

the analysis of our depreciation studies. changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively. under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using (i) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies. the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. in addition, we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies. any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets. for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies. a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations. when we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. however, many of our assets are self-constructed. a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties, which is typically performed by our employees, and for track line expansion and other capacity projects. costs that are directly attributable to capital projects (including overhead costs) are capitalized. direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset. general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.4 billion for 2014, $2.3 billion for 2013, and $2.1 billion for 2012. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 13. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions 2014 2013. millions | dec. 31 2014 | dec. 312013 accounts payable | $877 | $803 dividends payable | 438 | 356 income and other taxes payable | 412 | 491 accrued wages and vacation | 409 | 385 accrued casualty costs | 249 | 207 interest payable | 178 | 169 equipment rents payable | 100 | 96 other | 640 | 579 total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities | $3303 | $3086 . what was the difference in the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred between 2013 and 2014? 0.1 and the value for 2013 again? 2.3 so what is the percentage change during this time?

0.04348

at december 31, 2012, total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows:. in millions | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | thereafter lease obligations | $198 | $136 | $106 | $70 | $50 | $141 purchase obligations (a) | 3213 | 828 | 722 | 620 | 808 | 2654 total | $3411 | $964 | $828 | $690 | $858 | $2795 (a) includes $3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard, packaging and recycling business. rent expense was $231 million, $205 million and $210 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. guarantees in connection with sales of businesses, property, equipment, forestlands and other assets, interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets, and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities, breaches of representations and warranties, and other matters. where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation, accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction. environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws, includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act (cercla). many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources. while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws, as a practical matter, liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties. remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable. international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $92 million in the aggregate at december 31, 2012. one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake, minneso- ta. during 2009, in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla, international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study. in june 2011, the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $46 million. the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy. in october 2011, the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed. in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative, the remediation costs could be material, and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded. in october 2012, the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment. it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss, if any, which may be incurred. in addition to the above matters, other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current, closed or formerly-owned facilities, and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet, totaled approximately $46 million at december 31, 2012. other than as described above, completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper, inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site (kalamazoo river superfund site) in michigan. the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river, including a paper mill formerly owned by st. regis. the company is a successor in interest to st. regis. international paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability, if any, with respect to the site. accordingly, it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site. also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site, the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp, fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site. the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint, and for future remediation costs. the suit alleges that a mill, during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st. regis, discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling. also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company. in mid-2011, the suit was. between the years of 2011 and 2012, what was the change in rent expenses?

26.0

the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock, assuming dividend reinvestment, compared with the cumulative total return, assuming dividend reinvestment, of the standard & poor ("s&p") 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31, 2009 through december 31, 2014.. - | 12/09 | 12/10 | 12/11 | 12/12 | 12/13 | 12/14 e*trade financial corporation | 100.00 | 90.91 | 45.23 | 50.85 | 111.59 | 137.81 s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 115.06 | 117.49 | 136.30 | 180.44 | 205.14 dow jones us financials index | 100.00 | 112.72 | 98.24 | 124.62 | 167.26 | 191.67 table of contents. what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014 less an initial 100? 37.81 what is that divided by 100? 0.3781 what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2014 less and initial 100? 105.14 what is that divided by 100?

1.0514

entergy texas, inc. management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas, substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs. other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds. the recovery became effective july 2007. see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds. 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006. amount (in millions). - | amount (in millions) 2006 net revenue | $403.3 purchased power capacity | 13.1 securitization transition charge | 9.9 volume/weather | 9.7 transmission revenue | 6.1 base revenue | 2.6 other | -2.4 (2.4) 2007 net revenue | $442.3 the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana. the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds. as discussed above, in june 2007, egsrf i, a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas, issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property, which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds. see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance. the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales, including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period. retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors. see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006. the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006. refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase. gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds. the decrease was partially offset by the $39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $44 million in wholesale revenues, including $30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas. the receipt of such payments is being. what was the change in net revenue for entergy texas in 2007?

39.0

mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts (trust preferred securities), which qualify as tier 1 capital, were $23.899 billion at december 31, 2008, as compared to $23.594 billion at december 31, 2007. in 2008, citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities. the frb issued a final rule, with an effective date of april 11, 2005, which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies, but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards. under the rule, after a five-year transition period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations, such as citigroup, would be limited to 15% (15%) of total core capital elements, net of goodwill, less any associated deferred tax liability. the amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. at december 31, 2008, citigroup had approximately 11.8% (11.8%) against the limit. the company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31, 2009. the frb permits additional securities, such as the equity units sold to adia, to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% (25%) (including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% (15%) limit) of total core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. at december 31, 2008, citigroup had approximately 16.1% (16.1%) against the limit. the frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007. the frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to, and issue interpretations of, risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions. these may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets. capital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines. to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% (6%), a total capital (tier 1 + tier 2 capital) ratio of at least 10% (10%) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% (5%), and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels. at december 31, 2008, all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions, including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution, citibank, n.a., as noted in the following table: citibank, n.a. components of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007. in billions of dollars at year end | 2008 | 2007 tier 1 capital | $71.0 | $82.0 total capital (tier 1 and tier 2) | 108.4 | 121.6 tier 1 capital ratio | 9.94% (9.94%) | 8.98% (8.98%) total capital ratio (tier 1 and tier 2) | 15.18 | 13.33 leverage ratio (1) | 5.82 | 6.65 leverage ratio (1) 5.82 6.65 (1) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets. citibank, n.a. had a net loss for 2008 amounting to $6.2 billion. during 2008, citibank, n.a. received contributions from its parent company of $6.1 billion. citibank, n.a. did not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008. total subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc. that were outstanding at december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007 and included in citibank, n.a. 2019s tier 2 capital, amounted to $28.2 billion. citibank, n.a. received an additional $14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009. the impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above. the substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup, and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios, 201d also affected, or could affect, citibank, n.a.. what is the total capital in 2008 less tier 1 capital? 37.4 what is total capital from 2007? 121.6 what is tier 1 capital in 2007? 82.0 what is the difference of total capital and tier 1 in 2007?

39.6

management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity, capital resources and uses of capital.. cash flow data | years ended december 31, 2015 | years ended december 31, 2014 | years ended december 31, 2013 net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $848.2 | $831.2 | $598.4 net cash used in working capital2 | -117.5 (117.5) | -131.1 (131.1) | -9.6 (9.6) changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -56.7 (56.7) | -30.6 (30.6) | 4.1 net cash provided by operating activities | $674.0 | $669.5 | $592.9 net cash used in investing activities | -202.8 (202.8) | -200.8 (200.8) | -224.5 (224.5) net cash used in financing activities | -472.8 (472.8) | -343.9 (343.9) | -1212.3 (1212.3) 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets, amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation, non-cash (gain) loss related to early extinguishment of debt, losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes. 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $674.0, which was an improvement of $4.5 as compared to 2014, primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $13.6. due to the seasonality of our business, we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year, with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters. our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses. net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $669.5, which was an improvement of $76.6 as compared to 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in net income, offset by an increase in working capital usage of $121.5. our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses. the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow. in most of our businesses, our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients. to the extent possible, we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients. the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements, while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers. our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments. for example, while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year, they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year. investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $161.1, largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware. net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions. capital expenditures of $148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements. we made payments of $67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014, net of cash acquired.. what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015? 848.2 what is the 2014 value?

831.2

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) december 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated (in millions):. december 31, | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 balance at january 1 | $373 | $394 | $392 additions for current year tax positions | 8 | 7 | 7 additions for tax positions of prior years | 1 | 12 | 14 reductions for tax positions of prior years | -1 (1) | -7 (7) | -2 (2) effects of foreign currency translation | 2 | -7 (7) | -3 (3) settlements | -13 (13) | -19 (19) | -2 (2) lapse of statute of limitations | -1 (1) | -7 (7) | -12 (12) balance at december 31 | $369 | $373 | $394 the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years. the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded. while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits. however, audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty. it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material, but cannot be estimated as of december 31, 2016. our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted. 22. discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016, management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil, aes sul and eletropaulo. the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016. in december 2016, eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to, among other things, provide more liquidity of its shares. aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business, including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado, which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance. the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016. we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria, the company recognized an after tax loss of $382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $783 million, offset by a tax benefit of $266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul. prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter, the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell. however, the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group. on october 31, 2016, the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $484 million, excluding contingent consideration. upon disposal of aes sul, we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $737 million. the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $1.1 billion. this includes the reclassification of approximately $1 billion of cumulative translation losses, resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $92 million. sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1.4 billion and $32 million, respectively. sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31, 2014 was $133 million. prior to its classification as discontinued operations, sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment. as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies, effective july 1, 2014, the company prospectively adopted asu no. 2014-08. discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no. 2014-08 include the results of cameroon, saurashtra and various u.s. wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013, the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% (56%) equity interests in businesses in cameroon: sonel, an integrated utility, kribi, a gas and light fuel oil plant, and dibamba, a heavy. what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015? 373.0 and what was it in 2014? 394.0 by how much, then, did it change over the year? -21.0 and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2014 total, in percentage? -0.0533 and throughout the subsequent year of this period, what was that change in this total? -4.0 what is this change as a percentage of the 2015 unrecognized tax benefits?

-0.01072

aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies. the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $48 million at december 31, 2011. aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding. some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $64 million at december 31, 2011. during 2011, the company funded $15 million of these commitments. aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate, additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time. 17. related party transactions during 2011, the company, in the ordinary course of business, provided retail brokerage, consulting and financial advisory services to, and received wholesale brokerage services from, an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders. these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions. during 2011, commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $9 million. 18. segment information the company has two reportable operating segments: risk solutions and hr solutions. unallocated income and expenses, when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses, total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements. reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker (2018 2018codm 2019 2019) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices. the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm. risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker, helping clients manage their risks, via consultation, as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network. hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits, talent and related financial challenges, and improve business performance by designing, implementing, communicating and administering a wide range of human capital, retirement, investment management, health care, compensation and talent management strategies. aon 2019s total revenue is as follows (in millions):. years ended december 31 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 risk solutions | $6817 | $6423 | $6305 hr solutions | 4501 | 2111 | 1267 intersegment elimination | -31 (31) | -22 (22) | -26 (26) total operating segments | 11287 | 8512 | 7546 unallocated | 2014 | 2014 | 49 total revenue | $11287 | $8512 | $7595 . what was the total revenue in 2011? 11287.0 and what was it in 2010? 8512.0 how much, then, does the 2011 total revenue represent in relation to the 2010 one?

1.32601

material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% (1%) change in the assumed health care trend rate. for most of the participants in the u.s. plan, aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% (5%) per annum. because of this cap, net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% (5%) per year in the future. during 2007, aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s. plan over the next three years. the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees. 14. stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits (in millions):. years ended december 31 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 rsus | $138 | $124 | $132 performance plans | 62 | 60 | 67 stock options | 17 | 21 | 24 employee stock purchase plans | 4 | 4 | 3 total stock-based compensation expense | 221 | 209 | 226 tax benefit | 75 | 68 | 82 stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $146 | $141 | $144 during 2009, the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider. in connection with this conversion, a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed, which resulted in a $12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31, 2009. stock awards stock awards, in the form of rsus, are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus. service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant. the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. with certain limited exceptions, any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards. compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period. dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus, based on the initial grant amount. performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees. vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual, divisional or company-wide performance conditions, including revenue generation or growth in revenue, pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period. the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards. the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. compensation expense is recognized over the performance period, and in certain cases an additional vesting period, based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest. compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs. the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% (0-200%) of the number of units granted, based on the plan. dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus. during 2010, the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan (2018 2018lpp 2019 2019) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans. during 2010, 2009 and 2008, the company granted approximately 3.5 million. what was the difference in total stock-based compensation expense between 2009 and 2010? 12.0 and the specific value for 2009 again? 209.0 so what was the percentage increase over this time?

0.05742

as of december 31, 2017, the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $20 million, which expire from 2018 through 2020. a deferred tax asset of approximately $16 million (net of federal benefit) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards, with a valuation allowance of $7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31, 2017. the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $39 million, which expires in 2027. a deferred tax asset of approximately $3 million (net of federal benefit) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward, with a full valuation allowance as of december 31, 2017. other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036. 14. debt long-term debt consisted of the following:. ($in millions) | december 31 2017 | december 31 2016 senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% (5.000%) | 2014 | 600 senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% (5.000%) | 600 | 600 senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% (3.483%) | 600 | 2014 mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% (7.81%) | 84 | 84 gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% (4.55%) | 21 | 21 less unamortized debt issuance costs | -26 (26) | -27 (27) total long-term debt | 1279 | 1278 credit facility - in november 2017, the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement (the "credit facility") with third-party lenders. the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $1250 million, which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22, 2017. the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $500 million. the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ("libor") plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating, which may vary between 1.125% (1.125%) and 1.500% (1.500%). the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio. the commitment fee rate as of december 31, 2017 was 0.25% (0.25%) and may vary between 0.20% (0.20%) and 0.30% (0.30%). the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio. each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries, are and will be guarantors under the credit facility. in july 2015, the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility, including $345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans. as of december 31, 2017, $15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn, and the remaining $1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized. the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $11 million and $8 million as of december 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. senior notes - in december 2017, the company issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% (3.483%) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027, the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% (5.000%) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below. in november 2015, the company issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% (5.000%) senior notes due november 2025, the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% (7.125%) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below. interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually. the terms of the 5.000% (5.000%) and 3.483% (3.483%) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, sell assets, and effect consolidations or mergers. the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $15 million and $19 million as of december 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.. what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes from 2016 to 2017?

-4.0

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) in connection with these discover related purchases, we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos. contractual rights sold totaled $7.6 million during the year ended may 31, 2008 and $1.0 million during fiscal 2009. such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months. during fiscal 2009, we collected $4.4 million of such proceeds, which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows. we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale. proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense. during fiscal 2009, we recognized $1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities. other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008, we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer, s.a. and euroenvios conecta, s.l., which we collectively refer to as lfs spain. lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america. the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations. during fiscal 2008, we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states. the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering. the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions (in thousands):. - | total goodwill | $13536 customer-related intangible assets | 4091 contract-based intangible assets | 1031 property and equipment | 267 other current assets | 502 total assets acquired | 19427 current liabilities | -2347 (2347) minority interest in equity of subsidiary (at historical cost) | -486 (486) net assets acquired | $16594 the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years. the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years. these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly, we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions. in addition, during fiscal 2008, we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $1.7 million. the value assigned to the customer list of $0.1 million was expensed immediately. the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years. fiscal 2007 on july 24, 2006, we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited, or hsbc asia pacific. this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region. the. what is the sum of goodwill and customer related intangible assets? 17627.0 what is the sum including contract based intangible assets?

18658.0

shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing. the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock, the s&p 500 index, and the dow jones transportation average. the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment, which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods, assumes that $100 was invested on december 31, 2001 in the s&p 500 index, the dow jones transportation average, and the class b common stock of united parcel service, inc. comparison of five year cumulative total return $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 $180.00 $200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport. - | 12/31/01 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 united parcel service inc. | $100.00 | $117.19 | $140.49 | $163.54 | $146.35 | $148.92 s&p 500 index | $100.00 | $77.90 | $100.24 | $111.15 | $116.61 | $135.02 dow jones transportation average | $100.00 | $88.52 | $116.70 | $149.06 | $166.42 | $182.76 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31, 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance. these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock.. what is the price of united parcel service stock in 2006 less 100? 48.92 what is the net change of the dow jones transportation average in 2006 less 100?

82.76

software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process. integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices. purchase price. the company paid $11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl. in addition, the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $1.9 million. the total purchase consideration consisted of:. - | (in thousands) cash paid | $11001 prior investment in hpl | 1872 acquisition-related costs | 2831 total purchase price | $15704 acquisition-related costs of $2.8 million consist primarily of legal, tax and accounting fees of $1.6 million, $0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges, and $0.9 million in employee termination costs. as of october 31, 2006, the company had paid $2.2 million of the acquisition related costs, of which $1.1 million were for professional services costs, $0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $0.9 million were for employee termination costs. the $0.6 million balance remaining at october 31, 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs. assets acquired. the company acquired $8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $5.1 million in core developed technology, $3.2 million in customer relationships and $0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years. approximately $0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. accordingly, the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. additionally, the company acquired tangible assets of $14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $10.9 million. goodwill, representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $3.4 million. goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations. other. during the fiscal year 2006, the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $1.5 million. this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations. fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation (nassda) the company acquired nassda on may 11, 2005. reasons for the acquisition. the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools, particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design. purchase price. the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $200.2 million, or $7.00 per share. in addition, as required by the merger agreement, certain nassda officers, directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation. what was the total of intangible assets, in millions? 8.5 what is that in thousands? 8500.0 and what percentage did this total represent in relation to the total purchase price? 0.54126 and what percentage did the goodwill represent?

0.21651

edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) 13. common stock (continued) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program (the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019). under the nonemployee directors program, upon a director 2019s initial election to the board, the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $0.2 million, not to exceed 20000 shares. these grants vest over three years from the date of grant, subject to the director 2019s continued service. in addition, annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock, or a combination thereof, provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $0.2 million. these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant. under the nonemployee directors program, an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance. the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees (collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019). under the espp, eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% (85%) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase. under the espp, employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% (12%) of their compensation for common stock purchases, subject to certain limitations. the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states, to the extent permitted by local law. the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code. the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares. the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables. the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s. treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award. expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock. the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award, as well as historical exercise behavior, and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding. the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% (6.0%). the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods: option awards. - | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 average risk-free interest rate | 1.1% (1.1%) | 1.4% (1.4%) | 1.5% (1.5%) expected dividend yield | none | none | none expected volatility | 33% (33%) | 30% (30%) | 31% (31%) expected life (years) | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 fair value per share | $31.00 | $18.13 | $11.75 . what is the fair value per share in 2015? 18.13 what is it in 2014? 11.75 what is the net change?

6.38

notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) in connection with these discover related purchases, we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos. contractual rights sold totaled $7.6 million during the year ended may 31, 2008 and $1.0 million during fiscal 2009. such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months. during fiscal 2009, we collected $4.4 million of such proceeds, which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows. we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale. proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense. during fiscal 2009, we recognized $1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities. other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008, we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer, s.a. and euroenvios conecta, s.l., which we collectively refer to as lfs spain. lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america. the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations. during fiscal 2008, we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states. the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering. the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions (in thousands):. - | total goodwill | $13536 customer-related intangible assets | 4091 contract-based intangible assets | 1031 property and equipment | 267 other current assets | 502 total assets acquired | 19427 current liabilities | -2347 (2347) minority interest in equity of subsidiary (at historical cost) | -486 (486) net assets acquired | $16594 the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years. the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years. these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly, we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions. in addition, during fiscal 2008, we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $1.7 million. the value assigned to the customer list of $0.1 million was expensed immediately. the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years. fiscal 2007 on july 24, 2006, we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited, or hsbc asia pacific. this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region. the. what is the value of goodwill? 13536.0 what is the value of customer-related intangible assets? 4091.0 what is the sum? 17627.0 what is the sum including contract-based intangible assets? 18658.0 what is that total sum divided by total assets?

0.96042

masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) h. goodwill and other intangible assets (continued) goodwill at december 31, accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31, 2010 additions (a) discontinued operations (b) pre-tax impairment charge other (c) goodwill at december 31, cabinets and related products........... $587 $(364) $223 $2014 $2014 $(44) $2 $181. - | gross goodwill at december 31 2010 | accumulated impairment losses | net goodwill at december 31 2010 | additions (a) | discontinued operations (b) | pre-tax impairment charge | other (c) | net goodwill at december 31 2011 cabinets and related products | $587 | $-364 (364) | $223 | $2014 | $2014 | $-44 (44) | $2 | $181 plumbing products | 536 | -340 (340) | 196 | 9 | 2014 | 2014 | -4 (4) | 201 installation and other services | 1819 | -762 (762) | 1057 | 2014 | -13 (13) | 2014 | 2014 | 1044 decorative architectural products | 294 | 2014 | 294 | 2014 | 2014 | -75 (75) | 2014 | 219 other specialty products | 980 | -367 (367) | 613 | 2014 | 2014 | -367 (367) | 2014 | 246 total | $4216 | $-1833 (1833) | $2383 | $9 | $-13 (13) | $-486 (486) | $-2 (2) | $1891 (a) additions include acquisitions. (b) during 2011, the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale. subsequent to the reclassification, the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $13 million. (c) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions. in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011, the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units. the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired. the company recognized the non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges, in continuing operations, for goodwill of $486 million ($330 million, after tax) for 2011. in 2011, the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products, as well as decreased operating margins. the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business. the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s., the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated. the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31, 2011. other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $132 million and $174 million at december 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and principally included registered trademarks. in 2012 and 2011, the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment (2011 only) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units. the company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $42 million ($27 million, after tax) and $8 million ($5 million, after tax) in 2012 and 2011, respectively. in 2010, the company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $10 million ($6 million after tax) related to the installation and other services segment ($9 million pre-tax) and the plumbing products segment ($1 million pre-tax).. what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011? -492.0 and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?

-0.20646

mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) (in thousands, except percent and per share data) on june 24, 2008, mastercard entered into a settlement agreement (the 201camerican express settlement 201d) with american express company (201camerican express 201d) relating to the u.s. federal antitrust litigation between mastercard and american express. the american express settlement ended all existing litigation between mastercard and american express. under the terms of the american express settlement, mastercard is obligated to make 12 quarterly payments of up to $150000 per quarter beginning in the third quarter of 2008. mastercard 2019s maximum nominal payments will total $1800000. the amount of each quarterly payment is contingent on the performance of american express 2019s u.s. global network services business. the quarterly payments will be in an amount equal to 15% (15%) of american express 2019s u.s. global network services billings during the quarter, up to a maximum of $150000 per quarter. if, however, the payment for any quarter is less than $150000, the maximum payment for subsequent quarters will be increased by the difference between $150000 and the lesser amount that was paid in any quarter in which there was a shortfall. mastercard assumes american express will achieve these financial hurdles. mastercard recorded the present value of $1800000, at a 5.75% (5.75%) discount rate, or $1649345 for the year ended december 31, 2008. in 2003, mastercard entered into a settlement agreement (the 201cu.s. merchant lawsuit settlement 201d) related to the u.s. merchant lawsuit described under the caption 201cu.s. merchant and consumer litigations 201d in note 20 (legal and regulatory proceedings) and contract disputes with certain customers. under the terms of the u.s. merchant lawsuit settlement, the company was required to pay $125000 in 2003 and $100000 annually each december from 2004 through 2012. in addition, in 2003, several other lawsuits were initiated by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in the u.s. merchant lawsuit. the 201copt-out 201d merchant lawsuits were not covered by the terms of the u.s. merchant lawsuit settlement and all have been individually settled. we recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods. total liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31, 2006, as follows:. balance as of december 31 2006 | $476915 provision for litigation settlements (note 20) | 3400 interest accretion on u.s. merchant lawsuit | 38046 payments | -113925 (113925) balance as of december 31 2007 | 404436 provision for discover settlement | 862500 provision for american express settlement | 1649345 provision for other litigation settlements | 6000 interest accretion on u.s. merchant lawsuit settlement | 32879 interest accretion on american express settlement | 44300 payments on american express settlement | -300000 (300000) payments on discover settlement | -862500 (862500) payment on u.s. merchant lawsuit settlement | -100000 (100000) other payments and accretion | -662 (662) balance as of december 31 2008 | $1736298 see note 20 (legal and regulatory proceedings) for additional discussion regarding the company 2019s legal proceedings.. what was the change in total liabilities for litigation settlements from 2006 to 2007?

-72479.0

the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years:. - | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 beginning stores | 3460 | 3369 | 3264 | 3243 | 3153 new stores (1) | 116 | 95 | 110 | 75 | 109 stores closed | 2014 | -4 (4) | -5 (5) | -54 (54) | -19 (19) ending stores | 3576 | 3460 | 3369 | 3264 | 3243 (1) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores. store technology. our store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale, electronic parts catalog, or epc, and store-level inventory management system (collectively "store system"). information maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing, marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly. our fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year, make, model and engine type of their vehicles. our store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku, adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events, automatically process returns and defective merchandise, designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers. if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores, the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors. available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store, hub, pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price, availability and estimated delivery time. our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to (i) exchange data with our vendors and (ii) catalog and deliver updated, accurate parts information. we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities. all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time, comprehensive information to store personnel, resulting in improved customer service levels, team member productivity and in-stock availability. we plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience. among the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project. store support center merchandising. purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations: 2022 store support center in roanoke, virginia; 2022 regional office in minneapolis, minnesota; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei, taiwan. our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories, oil and chemicals. our global sourcing team works closely with both teams. in fiscal 2012, we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors, with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% (9%) of purchases. our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms, including pricing, payment terms and volume. the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and, in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners, utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand. we believe this process, which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category, and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales, gross margin and inventory productivity.. what was the number of new stores in 2008 and 2012? 225.0 so what was the average during this time?

112.5

supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities (unaudited) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves (in millions) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production, transportation and administrative costs $(4887) $(5312) $(3754) net changes in prices and production, transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 (1342) 6648. (in millions) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs | $-4887 (4887) | $-5312 (5312) | $-3754 (3754) net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production | 12845 | -1342 (1342) | 6648 extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs | 1816 | 1290 | 700 development costs incurred during the period | 1654 | 1251 | 1030 changes in estimated future development costs | -1727 (1727) | -527 (527) | -552 (552) revisions of previous quantity estimates | 290 | 1319 | 820 net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place | 23 | 30 | 4557 accretion of discount | 1726 | 1882 | 1124 net change in income taxes | -6751 (6751) | -660 (660) | -6694 (6694) timing and other | -12 (12) | -14 (14) | 307 net change for the year | 4977 | -2083 (2083) | 4186 beginning of year | 8518 | 10601 | 6415 end of year | $13495 | $8518 | $10601 net change for the year from discontinued operations | $2013 | $-216 (216) | $162 . what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007? 403.0 what were development costs in 2007? 1654.0 what is the net change added to the 2007 costs?

2057.0

generally, our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period, followed by a 20 year amortization term. during the draw period, we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest. based upon outstanding balances at december 31, 2011, the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end. home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product. in millions | interest only product | principal and interest product 2012 | $904 | $266 2013 | 1211 | 331 2014 | 2043 | 598 2015 | 1988 | 820 2016 and thereafter | 6961 | 5601 total (a) | $13107 | $7616 (a) includes approximately $306 million, $44 million, $60 million, $100 million, and $246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 and thereafter, respectively. we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only, as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments. based upon outstanding balances, and excluding purchased impaired loans, at december 31, 2011, for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw (e.g., draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated), approximately 4.32% (4.32%) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% (5.57%) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due. generally, when a borrower becomes 60 days past due, we terminate borrowing privileges, and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated. at that point, we continue our collection/recovery processes, which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr. see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information. loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure, where appropriate. initially, a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program. if a borrower does not qualify under a government program, the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program. our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate, extend the term and/or defer principal. temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs. further, certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs. additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report. a temporary modification, with a term between three and 60 months, involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event, such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification. typically, these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate. a permanent modification, with a term greater than 60 months, is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed. permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program (hamp) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs. for consumer loan programs, such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines, we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance. examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family, or a loss of employment. permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount, but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made. residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months, although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months. we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses. the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months, nine months and twelve months after the modification date. 78 the pnc financial services group, inc. 2013 form 10-k. what is the sum of interest only product in 2012 and principal and interest product in 2012? 1170.0 what is the value of principal and interest product in 2012? 266.0 what is that value over the sum of both product values?

0.22735

entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (d) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1, 2003 and will then be remarketed. (e) on june 1, 2002, entergy louisiana remarketed $55 million st. charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030, resetting the interest rate to 4.9% (4.9%) through may 2005. (f) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1, 2005 and will then be remarketed. (g) the fair value excludes lease obligations, long-term doe obligations, and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year. it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2002, for the next five years are as follows (in thousands):. 2003 | $1150786 2004 | $925005 2005 | $540372 2006 | $139952 2007 | $475288 not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $30.2 million annually, which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% (167%) of such requirements. in december 2002, when the damhead creek project was sold, the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements. in november 2000, entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001. covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% (7.75%) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% (65%) or less of its total capitalization. if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit, or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur. in january 2003, entergy paid in full, at maturity, the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project. capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors, entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% (35%) of its total capitalization (excluding short-term debt); fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt, under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt.. what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding in 2005? 925005.0 what was that in 2004? 540372.0 between the two years, then, how much did that total vary?

384633.0

transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses. these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions. the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows; however, there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond. asset sales during 2003, we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries. this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity. the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003. sales proceeds project name date completed (in millions) location. project name | date completed | sales proceeds (in millions) | location cilcorp/medina valley | january 2003 | $495 | united states aes ecogen/aes mt. stuart | january 2003 | $59 | australia mountainview | march 2003 | $30 | united states kelvin | march 2003 | $29 | south africa songas | april 2003 | $94 | tanzania aes barry limited | july 2003 | a340/$62 | united kingdom aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd | december 2003 | $145 | bangladesh aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi | august 2003 | $23 | republic of georgia medway power limited/aes medway operations limited | november 2003 | a347/$78 | united kingdom aes oasis limited | december 2003 | $150 | pakistan/oman the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future. however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet. for any sales that happen in the future, there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries. depending on which businesses are eventually sold, the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations. furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve. subsidiary restructuring during 2003, we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses. the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities. businesses impacted include eletropaulo, tiete, uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile. brazil eletropaulo. aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998, when the company was privatized. in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it. aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo, including both common and preferred shares, through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 (2018 2018bndes 2019 2019), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a. (2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019), to aes 2019s subsidiaries, aes elpa s.a. (2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019) and aes transgas empreendimentos, s.a. (2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019).. what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003? 495.0 what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt. stuart in january 2003?

59.0

goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed. the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits: 2022 increased market presence and opportunities. the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue, earnings and stockholder return. the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers, as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies, products and services. the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets. the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007. 2022 operating efficiencies. the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings. the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa, in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets, including in-process research and development. the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period (in thousands, except per share data): year ended december 30, year ended december 31. - | year ended december 30 2007 | year ended december 31 2006 revenue | $366854 | $187103 net income (loss) | $17388 | $-38957 (38957) net income (loss) per share basic | $0.32 | $-0.68 (0.68) net income (loss) per share diluted | $0.29 | $-0.68 (0.68) the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented, or the results that may occur in the future. the pro forma results exclude the $303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007. investment in solexa on november 12, 2006, the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies. this investment was valued at $67.8 million as of december 31, 2006, which represented a market value of $13.15 per share of solexa common stock. this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26, 2007. illumina, inc. notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued). what were revenues in 2007? 366854.0 what were they in 2006? 187103.0 what is the net difference? 179751.0 what is the difference divided by the 2006 revenues?

0.96071

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to: fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances. the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to: fffd a decrease of $31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002; and fffd a decrease of $76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001. the refund was made in december 2001. 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31, 2001 for u.s. utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $61.5 million primarily due to: fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001, at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001, at entergy mississippi in january 2001, and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001, primarily at entergy arkansas. non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $128 million to $201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee, which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002, respectively. the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $49 million to $128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year, as each was purchased in november 2000, and the operation of indian point 2, which was purchased in september 2001. following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear:. - | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 net mw in operation at december 31 | 3955 | 3445 | 2475 generation in gwh for the year | 29953 | 22614 | 7171 capacity factor for the year | 93% (93%) | 93% (93%) | 94% (94%) 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee (except as otherwise noted): fffd operating revenues increased $411.0 million to $1.2 billion; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $201.8 million to $596.3 million; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $25.1 million to $42.8 million; fffd fuel expenses increased $29.4 million to $105.2 million; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $23.9 million to $46.8 million, which was due primarily to a. what were operating revenues in 2002? 1.2 what is that times 1000? 1200.0 what was the amount operating revenues increased in 2002?

411.0

when we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. however, many of our assets are self-constructed. a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion (capacity projects) and replacement (program projects), which is typically performed by our employees. approximately 13% (13%) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets. costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized. direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset. these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no. 67, accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects. general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 10. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions of dollars 2008 2007. millions of dollars | dec. 31 2008 | dec. 31 2007 accounts payable | $629 | $732 accrued wages and vacation | 367 | 394 accrued casualty costs | 390 | 371 income and other taxes | 207 | 343 dividends and interest | 328 | 284 equipment rents payable | 93 | 103 other | 546 | 675 total accounts payable and other current liabilities | $2560 | $2902 11. fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008, we fully adopted fasb statement no. 157, fair value measurements (fas 157). fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations. fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis. this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories: level 1: quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. level 2: observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. level 3: unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.. as of december 31, 2008, what was the amount of the accrued wages and vacation?

367.0

used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year, or approximately $35 million per year. the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes. 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes, which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity, and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year. the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes. 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes, which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. interest on the 4.25% (4.25%) notes due in 2021 (201c2021 notes 201d) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year, and is approximately $32 million per year. the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes. 2019 notes. in december 2009, the company issued $2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $0.5 billion of 2.25% (2.25%) notes, which were repaid in december 2012, $1.0 billion of 3.50% (3.50%) notes, which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity, and $1.0 billion of 5.0% (5.0%) notes maturing in december 2019 (the 201c2019 notes 201d). net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program, which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1, 2009, and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year. these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes. 13. commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043. future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows: (in millions). year | amount 2018 | 141 2019 | 132 2020 | 126 2021 | 118 2022 | 109 thereafter | 1580 total | $2206 in may 2017, the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc, for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards, new york, new york. the term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin, expected to occur in may 2023, with the option to renew for a specified term. the lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term, increasing every five years to $58 million, $66 million and $74 million per year (or approximately $1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term). this lease is classified as an operating lease and, as such, is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition. rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $132 million, $134 million and $136 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. investment commitments. at december 31, 2017, the company had $298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds, including consolidated vies. these funds include private equity funds, real assets funds, and opportunistic funds. this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds. generally, the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment. these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding. the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for, and with, its clients. contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions. in connection with certain acquisitions, blackrock is required to make contingent payments, subject to achieving specified performance targets, which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products. the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31, 2017 totaled $236 million, including $128 million related to the first reserve transaction, and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition.. what is the increased rent after five years? 58.0 and the base rental during the first five years? 51.0 so what was the difference between these two values? 7.0 and the growth rate of this value?

0.13725

american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years; however, tv azteca has the right to purchase, at fair market value, the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement. should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights (in whole or in part), it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election. the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally. the company has accounted for the annual payment of $1.5 million as a capital lease (initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $18.6 million). the capital lease asset and the discount on the note, which aggregate approximately $30.2 million, represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement. on a quarterly basis, the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca. as of december 31, 2005 and 2004, the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required. an executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006. as of december 31, 2005 and 2004, the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $11.1 million and $11.2 million, respectively. 7. financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31, (in thousands):. - | 2005 | 2004 american tower credit facility | $793000 | $698000 spectrasite credit facility | 700000 | - senior subordinated notes | 400000 | 400000 senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation | 160252 | 303755 senior notes net of discount and premium | 726754 | 1001817 convertible notes net of discount | 773058 | 830056 notes payable and capital leases | 60365 | 59986 total | 3613429 | 3293614 less current portion of other long-term obligations | -162153 (162153) | -138386 (138386) long-term debt | $3451276 | $3155228 new credit facilities 2014in october 2005, the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries. the company replaced the existing american tower $1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $1.15 billion senior secured credit facility. as a result of the repayment of the previous credit facilities, the company recorded a net loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005.. between the years of 2004 and 2005, what was the variation in the long-term debt? 296048.0 and concerning the long-term financing, what percentage of it was classified as current by the end of the last year of that period, in 2005?

0.04488

part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange (201cnyse 201d) for the years 2010 and 2009.. 2010 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $44.61 | $40.10 quarter ended june 30 | 45.33 | 38.86 quarter ended september 30 | 52.11 | 43.70 quarter ended december 31 | 53.14 | 49.61 2009 | high | low quarter ended march 31 | $32.53 | $25.45 quarter ended june 30 | 34.52 | 27.93 quarter ended september 30 | 37.71 | 29.89 quarter ended december 31 | 43.84 | 35.03 on february 11, 2011, the closing price of our common stock was $56.73 per share as reported on the nyse. as of february 11, 2011, we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders. dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock. payment of dividends in the future, when, as and if authorized by our board of directors, would depend upon many factors, including our earnings and financial condition, restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements, our debt service requirements, our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time, including the potential determination to elect reit status. in addition, the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied. for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan, our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization, see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.. what was the change in the share price from lowest to highest during the quarter ended september 30 of 2010?

8.41

note 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions):. - | 2015 | 2014 notes with rates from 1.85% (1.85%) to 3.80% (3.80%) due 2016 to 2045 | $8150 | $1400 notes with rates from 4.07% (4.07%) to 5.72% (5.72%) due 2019 to 2046 | 6089 | 3589 notes with rates from 6.15% (6.15%) to 9.13% (9.13%) due 2016 to 2036 | 1941 | 1941 other debt | 116 | 111 total long-term debt | 16296 | 7041 less: unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs | -1035 (1035) | -899 (899) total long-term debt net | $15261 | $6142 revolving credit facilities on october 9, 2015, we entered into a new $2.5 billion revolving credit facility (the 5-year facility) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $1.5 billion revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to expire in august 2019. the 5-year facility, which expires on october 9, 2020, is available for general corporate purposes. the undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper. we may request and the banks may grant, at their discretion, an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $500 million. there were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31, in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky, on october 9, 2015, we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility (the 364-day facility, and together with the 5-year facility, the facilities) with various banks that provided $7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of sikorsky. concurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition, we borrowed $6.0 billion under the 364-day facility. on november 23, 2015, we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt (see below) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility. borrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based, at our option, on a eurodollar rate or a base rate, as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements. each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to, among other things, our compliance with various representations, warranties, and covenants, including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio, as defined in the five-year facility agreement. as of december 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement, as well as in our debt agreements. long-term debt on november 23, 2015, we issued $7.0 billion of notes (the november 2015 notes) in a registered public offering. we received net proceeds of $6.9 billion from the offering, after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs, which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt. the november 2015 notes consist of: 2022 $750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% (1.85%) (the 2018 notes); 2022 $1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% (2.50%) (the 2020 notes); 2022 $500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% (3.10%) the 2023 notes); 2022 $2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% (3.55%) (the 2026 notes); 2022 $500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% (4.50%) (the 2036 notes); and 2022 $2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% (4.70%) (the 2046 notes). we may, at our option, redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. interest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year, beginning on may 23, 2016; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year, beginning on july 15, 2016; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year, beginning on may 15, 2016. the november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. the proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes.. what was the total long-term debt net in 2015? 15261.0 and what was it in 2014? 6142.0 what was, then, the change over the year? 9119.0 what was the total long-term debt net in 2014? 6142.0 and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2014 long-term debt, in percentage?

1.4847

item 7. management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (md&a) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. md&a is organized as follows: 2022 overview. discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a. 2022 critical accounting estimates. accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts. 2022 results of operations. an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources. an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows, and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity. 2022 fair value of financial instruments. discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments. 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements. overview of contractual obligations, contingent liabilities, commitments, and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28, 2013, including expected payment schedule. the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. words such as 201canticipates, 201d 201cexpects, 201d 201cintends, 201d 201cplans, 201d 201cbelieves, 201d 201cseeks, 201d 201cestimates, 201d 201ccontinues, 201d 201cmay, 201d 201cwill, 201d 201cshould, 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. in addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, uncertain events or assumptions, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i, item 1a of this form 10-k. our actual results may differ materially, and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures, mergers, acquisitions, or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14, 2014. overview our results of operations for each period were as follows:. (dollars in millions except per share amounts) | three months ended dec. 282013 | three months ended sept. 282013 | three months ended change | three months ended dec. 282013 | three months ended dec. 292012 | change net revenue | $13834 | $13483 | $351 | $52708 | $53341 | $-633 (633) gross margin | $8571 | $8414 | $157 | $31521 | $33151 | $-1630 (1630) gross margin percentage | 62.0% (62.0%) | 62.4% (62.4%) | (0.4)% (%) | 59.8% (59.8%) | 62.1% (62.1%) | (2.3)% (%) operating income | $3549 | $3504 | $45 | $12291 | $14638 | $-2347 (2347) net income | $2625 | $2950 | $-325 (325) | $9620 | $11005 | $-1385 (1385) diluted earnings per common share | $0.51 | $0.58 | $-0.07 (0.07) | $1.89 | $2.13 | $-0.24 (0.24) revenue for 2013 was down 1% (1%) from 2012. pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year, but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization. dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year. higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012. in response to the current business environment and to better align resources, management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities. these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $240 million for 2013. table of contents. what was the change in the net revenue from 2012 to 2013? -633.0 and what was that net revenue in 2012?

53341.0

entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements (a) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds, some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds. (b) these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). (c) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982, entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service. the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7, 1983. entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee, plus accrued interest, in long-term (d) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations. (e) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $149 million at entergy louisiana and $97 million at system energy, long-term doe obligations of $181 million at entergy arkansas, and the note payable to nypa of $95 million at entergy, and includes debt due within one year. fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations) for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2013, for the next five years are as follows: amount (in thousands). - | amount (in thousands) 2014 | $385373 2015 | $1110566 2016 | $270852 2017 | $766801 2018 | $1324616 in november 2000, entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001. in july 2003 a payment of $102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa. under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes, if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness, entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit. entergy gulf states louisiana, entergy louisiana, entergy mississippi, entergy texas, and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015. entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015. entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014. capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors, entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% (35%) of its total capitalization (excluding short- term debt);. what is the amount of long-term debt due in 2014, in thousands? 385373.0 and what is it for 2015, also in thousands? 1110566.0 what is, then, in thousands, the total long-term debt due in those two years, combined?

1495939.0

abiomed, inc. and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) note 14. income taxes (continued) on april 1, 2007, the company adopted financial interpretation fin no. 48, accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no. 109 (201cfin no. 48 201d), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no. 109, accounting for income taxes. fin no. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. fin no. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized. as a result of its adoption of fin no. 48, the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1, 2007. this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005. the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan, which it completed in fiscal year 2009. the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations. as of march 31, 2009, the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31, 2008. as such, the company had no fin no. 48 liability at march 31, 2009. on a quarterly basis, the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest. it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months; however, it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position. a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31, 2009 (in thousands) is as follows:. balance at march 31 2008 | $168 reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations | -168 (168) balance at march 31 2009 | $2014 the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s. federal income tax, as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981. all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions, including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts. however, since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income, those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized. note 15. commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows: 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device, a payment of $5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device, a payment of $5583333, and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide, a payment of $5583334. the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31, 2009. in april 2009, the company received fda 510 (k) clearance of its impella 5.0 product, triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device. in may 2009, the company paid $1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock.. what would be the payments made upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide? 5583334.0 and converted to the single digits? 5.58333 so what was the amount paid on this final milestone in cash?

1.8

2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $311 million, or 4% (4%), compared to 2010. the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs (primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds) and approximately $75 million for training and logistics solutions programs. partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $165 million from production on the lcs program. mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $68 million, or 10% (10%), compared to 2010. the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs (including the terminated presidential helicopter program) and approximately $40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions. partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010. adjustments not related to volume, including net profit rate adjustments described above, were approximately $55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010. backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs (primarily mh-60 and lcs), partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs (primarily aegis). backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs. trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs. operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance. space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development, design, engineering, and production of satellites, strategic and defensive missile systems, and space transportation systems. space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems. space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system (sbirs), advanced extremely high frequency (aehf) system, mobile user objective system (muos), global positioning satellite (gps) iii system, geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series (goes-r), trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile, and orion. operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance (ula), which provides expendable launch services for the u.s. government, united space alliance (usa), which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011, and a joint venture that manages the u.k. 2019s atomic weapons establishment program. space systems 2019 operating results included the following (in millions):. - | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 net sales | $8347 | $8161 | $8268 operating profit | 1083 | 1063 | 1030 operating margins | 13.0% (13.0%) | 13.0% (13.0%) | 12.5% (12.5%) backlog at year-end | 18100 | 16000 | 17800 2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $186 million, or 2% (2%), compared to 2011. the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries (two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011); about $125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements; and approximately $70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs. partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $105 million from certain government satellite programs (primarily sbirs and muos) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements; and about $55 million from the nasa external tank program, which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011.. what were operating profits in 2012? 1083.0 what were they in 2011? 1063.0 what is the net change? 20.0 what was the 2011 value?

1063.0

entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to: fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances. the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to: fffd a decrease of $31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002; and fffd a decrease of $76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001. the refund was made in december 2001. 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31, 2001 for u.s. utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $61.5 million primarily due to: fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001, at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001, at entergy mississippi in january 2001, and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001, primarily at entergy arkansas. non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $128 million to $201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee, which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002, respectively. the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $49 million to $128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year, as each was purchased in november 2000, and the operation of indian point 2, which was purchased in september 2001. following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear:. - | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 net mw in operation at december 31 | 3955 | 3445 | 2475 generation in gwh for the year | 29953 | 22614 | 7171 capacity factor for the year | 93% (93%) | 93% (93%) | 94% (94%) 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee (except as otherwise noted): fffd operating revenues increased $411.0 million to $1.2 billion; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $201.8 million to $596.3 million; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $25.1 million to $42.8 million; fffd fuel expenses increased $29.4 million to $105.2 million; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $23.9 million to $46.8 million, which was due primarily to a. what is the value of earning for non-utility nuclear in 2002?

201.0

entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (d) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1, 2003 and will then be remarketed. (e) on june 1, 2002, entergy louisiana remarketed $55 million st. charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030, resetting the interest rate to 4.9% (4.9%) through may 2005. (f) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1, 2005 and will then be remarketed. (g) the fair value excludes lease obligations, long-term doe obligations, and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year. it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2002, for the next five years are as follows (in thousands):. 2003 | $1150786 2004 | $925005 2005 | $540372 2006 | $139952 2007 | $475288 not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $30.2 million annually, which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% (167%) of such requirements. in december 2002, when the damhead creek project was sold, the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements. in november 2000, entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001. covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% (7.75%) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% (65%) or less of its total capitalization. if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit, or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur. in january 2003, entergy paid in full, at maturity, the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project. capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors, entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% (35%) of its total capitalization (excluding short-term debt); fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt, under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt.. what were the total payments made for the notes entergy issued to nypa that lasted 7 years?

756.0

performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index. the graph assumes the investment of $100 as of december 31, 2013, in pmi common stock (at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis. date pmi pmi peer group (1) s&p 500 index. date | pmi | pmi peer group (1) | s&p 500 index december 31 2013 | $100.00 | $100.00 | $100.00 december 31 2014 | $97.90 | $107.80 | $113.70 december 31 2015 | $111.00 | $116.80 | $115.30 december 31 2016 | $120.50 | $118.40 | $129.00 december 31 2017 | $144.50 | $140.50 | $157.20 december 31 2018 | $96.50 | $127.70 | $150.30 (1) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year. the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics: global presence; a focus on consumer products; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi. the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies. as a result of this review, the following companies constitute the pmi peer group: altria group, inc., anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv, british american tobacco p.l.c., the coca-cola company, colgate-palmolive co., diageo plc, heineken n.v., imperial brands plc, japan tobacco inc., johnson & johnson, kimberly-clark corporation, the kraft-heinz company, mcdonald's corp., mondel z international, inc., nestl e9 s.a., pepsico, inc., the procter & gamble company, roche holding ag, and unilever nv and plc. note: figures are rounded to the nearest $0.10.. what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014? 97.9 and by what amount did it change since 2013? -2.1 what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013? -0.021 and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart? -3.5 what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price? -0.035 and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index? 50.3 and what was this s&p 500 index change as a percentage of its price performance in 2013?

0.503

the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004. millions of dollars | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 track | $1487 | $1472 | $1328 capacity and commercial facilities | 510 | 509 | 347 locomotives and freight cars | 135 | 98 | 125 other | 110 | 90 | 76 total | $2242 | $2169 | $1876 in 2007, we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $3.2 billion, which may include long- term leases. these investments will be used to maintain track and structures, continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors, remove bottlenecks, upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs, build and improve facilities and terminals, and develop and implement new technologies. we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety, enhance customer service, promote growth, and improve operational fluidity. we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, and cash on hand at december 31, 2006. we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007. for the years ended december 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4, 2.9, and 2.1, respectively. the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income. the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis. earnings represent income from continuing operations, less equity earnings net of distributions, plus fixed charges and income taxes. fixed charges represent interest charges, amortization of debt discount, and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges. see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges. financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31, 2006, we had $2 billion in revolving credit facilities available, including $1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 (collectively, the "facilities"). the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper. neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006. commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers. these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates, plus a spread, depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings. the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio. at december 31, 2006, we were in compliance with these covenants. the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions, credit rating triggers (other than rating-dependent pricing), or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral. in addition to our revolving credit facilities, we had $150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available, including $75 million that expires in march 2007 and $75 million expiring in may 2007. neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31, 2006. we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $75 million lines. dividends 2013 on january 30, 2007, we increased the quarterly dividend to $0.35 per share, payable beginning on april 2, 2007, to shareholders of record on february 28, 2007. we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, and cash on hand at december 31, 2006. dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities. retained earnings available. what was the difference in the cash capital investments in track between 2004 and 2005?

144.0

the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) december 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018. aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico. therefore, we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa. starting prior to the hurricanes, prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company, and on july 2, 2017, filed for bankruptcy under title iii. as a result of the bankruptcy filing, aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $365 million and $36 million, respectively, is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31, 2017. in november 2017, aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events. this agreement will expire on march 22, 2018. the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31, 2017 totaled $86 million, of which $53 million was overdue. after the filing of title iii protection, and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes, aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns. considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $627 million is recoverable as of december 31, 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required. foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s. dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows: the argentine peso, the brazilian real, the dominican republic peso, the euro, the chilean peso, the colombian peso, and the philippine peso. concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations, the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply. several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas. however, no single customer accounted for 10% (10%) or more of total revenue in 2017, 2016 or 2015. the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements. if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated, the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms. 26. related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions. in the ordinary course of business, these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions, and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments. at two of our generation businesses in mexico, the offtakers exercise significant influence, but not control, through representation on these businesses' boards of directors. these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses. in chile, we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. additionally, the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements. the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated (in millions):. years ended december 31, | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 revenue 2014non-regulated | $1297 | $1100 | $1099 cost of sales 2014non-regulated | 220 | 210 | 330 interest income | 8 | 4 | 25 interest expense | 36 | 39 | 33 . what is the total of receivables from puerto rico? 86.0 what was the amount overdue? 53.0 what is the difference?

33.0

divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses, and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products, which, in aggregate, decreased sales by two percent. net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products, paints and other coating products and builders' hardware. net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows, and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products. net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products. our gross profit margins were 32.2 percent, 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. the 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs, the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler, an increase in other expenses (such as logistics costs and salaries) and unfavorable sales mix. these negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices, the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives, and increased sales volume. the 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume, a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs, and cost savings initiatives. selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016. the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of sales, was driven by leverage of fixed expenses, due primarily to increased sales volume, and improved cost control. the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit, as adjusted to exclude certain items, dollars in millions:. - | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 operating profit as reported | $1211 | $1194 | $1087 rationalization charges | 14 | 4 | 22 kichler inventory step up adjustment | 40 | 2014 | 2014 operating profit as adjusted | $1265 | $1198 | $1109 operating profit margins as reported | 14.5% (14.5%) | 15.6% (15.6%) | 14.8% (14.8%) operating profit margins as adjusted | 15.1% (15.1%) | 15.7% (15.7%) | 15.1% (15.1%) operating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs, the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses (such as logistics costs, salaries and erp costs). these negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices, benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume. operating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume, cost savings initiatives, and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs. operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses, including stock-based compensation, health insurance costs, trade show costs and increased head count. due to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china, and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019, we could be exposed to approximately $150 million of potential annual direct cost increases. we will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases, supplier negotiations, supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures. other income (expense), net other, net, for 2018 included $14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $8 million of realized foreign currency losses. these expenses were partially offset by $3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $1 million related to distributions from private equity funds. other, net, for 2017 included $26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs, $13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund, partially offset by $3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $1 million of earnings related to equity method investments.. what was the operating profit margin as adjusted in 2017? 0.157 and what was it in 2016?

0.151

part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange. prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company, the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa. 201d in connection with the separation, on november 1, 2016, the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc. 201d on october 5, 2016, the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock (the 201creverse stock split 201d). as a result of the reverse stock split, every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock, without any change in the par value per share. the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares, and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares. the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6, 2016. on november 1, 2016, the company completed the separation of its business into two independent, publicly traded companies: the company and alcoa corporation. the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% (80.1%) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders. the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20, 2016 (the 201crecord date 201d) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date. the company retained 19.9% (19.9%) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation. the following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange, adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6, 2016. the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1, 2016, and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods.. quarter | 2016 high | 2016 low | 2016 dividend | 2016 high | 2016 low | dividend first | $30.66 | $18.42 | $0.09 | $51.30 | $37.95 | $0.09 second | 34.50 | 26.34 | 0.09 | 42.87 | 33.45 | 0.09 third | 32.91 | 27.09 | 0.09 | 33.69 | 23.91 | 0.09 fourth (separation occurred on november 1 2016) | 32.10 | 16.75 | 0.09 | 33.54 | 23.43 | 0.09 year | $34.50 | $16.75 | $0.36 | $51.30 | $23.43 | $0.36 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23, 2017.. what was the high sales price in the second quarter of 2016? 34.5 what was the high price in the first quarter? 30.66 what is the ratio of the high prices, second quarter to first quarter?

1.12524

part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange. prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company, the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa. 201d in connection with the separation, on november 1, 2016, the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc. 201d on october 5, 2016, the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock (the 201creverse stock split 201d). as a result of the reverse stock split, every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock, without any change in the par value per share. the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares, and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares. the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6, 2016. on november 1, 2016, the company completed the separation of its business into two independent, publicly traded companies: the company and alcoa corporation. the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% (80.1%) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders. the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20, 2016 (the 201crecord date 201d) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date. the company retained 19.9% (19.9%) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation. see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k. the following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange, adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6, 2016. the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1, 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc. prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1, 2016, and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices.. quarter | 2017 high | 2017 low | 2017 dividend | 2017 high | 2017 low | dividend first | $30.69 | $18.64 | $0.06 | $30.66 | $18.42 | $0.09 second | 28.65 | 21.76 | 0.06 | 34.50 | 26.34 | 0.09 third | 26.84 | 22.67 | 0.06 | 32.91 | 27.09 | 0.09 fourth (separation occurred on november 1 2016) | 27.85 | 22.74 | 0.06 | 32.10 | 16.75 | 0.09 year | $30.69 | $18.64 | $0.24 | $34.50 | $16.75 | $0.36 the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16, 2018.. what is the highest stock price in the second quarter of 2017? 28.65 what about the lowest stock price?

21.76

notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) cash flows for 2010, we expect to contribute $25.2 and $9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans, respectively. a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k. pension plan. additionally, we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k. pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010. as a result, we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years. during 2009, we contributed $31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible. the following estimated future benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid in the years indicated below. domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans. years | domestic pension plans | foreign pension plans | postretirement benefit plans 2010 | $17.2 | $23.5 | $5.8 2011 | 11.1 | 24.7 | 5.7 2012 | 10.8 | 26.4 | 5.7 2013 | 10.5 | 28.2 | 5.6 2014 | 10.5 | 32.4 | 5.5 2015 2013 2019 | 48.5 | 175.3 | 24.8 the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug, improvement and modernization act of 2003. federal subsidies are estimated to range from $0.5 in 2010 to $0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $2.4 for the period 2015-2019. savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans (the 201csavings plans 201d) that cover substantially all domestic employees. the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives. we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service. amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $35.1, $29.6 and $31.4, respectively. expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $3.8, $4.0 and $4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $2.7, $7.8, $6.0 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. in addition, we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $25.0, $28.7 and $26.7 to these plans in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which (i) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation, or (ii) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account. the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions, such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination. as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, the deferred compensation liability balance was $100.3 and $107.6, respectively. amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $11.6, $5.7 and $11.9, respectively. we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment, payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated. the deferred benefit liability was $178.2 and $182.1 as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $12.0, $14.9 and $15.5, respectively. we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities. as of december 31, 2009 and 2008, the cash surrender value of these policies was $119.4 and $100.2, respectively. in addition to the life insurance policies, certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities. these investments, along with the life insurance policies, are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit. how much was contributed to defined contribution plans for foreign countries in 2008?

28.7

impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31:. (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 fair value | $99832 | $81881 amortized cost | 100013 | 82329 net unrealized loss pre-tax | $-181 (181) | $-448 (448) net unrealized loss after-tax | $-113 (113) | $-270 (270) the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $303 million, or $189 million after-tax, and $523 million, or $317 million after-tax, as of december 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, or oci. refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8. the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31, 2010 to december 31, 2011 resulted primarily from amortization. we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified, the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component. the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income, and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security. our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation, more fully described in note 3, of economic and security-specific factors. such factors are based on estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations, other-than-temporary impairment could increase, in particular, the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income. given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio, particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities, to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks, the performance of the u.s. housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance. as such, our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices. generally, indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears. as of september 30, 2011, national housing prices, according to the case-shiller national home price index, had declined by approximately 31.3% (31.3%) peak-to-current. overall, management 2019s expectation, for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31, 2011, was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% (35%) peak-to-trough. the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate. in addition, management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above. the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations. our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses. ultimately, other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security. in addition, we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s. residential mortgage-backed portfolio. we estimate, for example, that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $10 million to $50 million, if national housing prices were to decline by 37% (37%) to 39% (39%) peak-to-trough, compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% (35%) described above. this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults. to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations, resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated. excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining. what was the fair value in 2011?

99832.0

entergy texas, inc. management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas, substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs. other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds. the recovery became effective july 2007. see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds. 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006. amount (in millions). - | amount (in millions) 2006 net revenue | $403.3 purchased power capacity | 13.1 securitization transition charge | 9.9 volume/weather | 9.7 transmission revenue | 6.1 base revenue | 2.6 other | -2.4 (2.4) 2007 net revenue | $442.3 the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana. the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds. as discussed above, in june 2007, egsrf i, a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas, issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property, which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds. see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance. the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales, including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period. retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors. see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006. the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006. refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase. gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds. the decrease was partially offset by the $39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $44 million in wholesale revenues, including $30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas. the receipt of such payments is being. what was the net revenue for entergy texas, inc. in 2007? 442.3 and what was it in 2006? 403.3 what was, then, the change over the year? 39.0 what was the net revenue for entergy texas, inc. in 2006? 403.3 and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 net revenue?

0.0967

stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan. marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. through 2004, certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right, which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock, as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan, over the option price of the shares. in general, stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted. stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005, marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan. no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan. similar to stock options, stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price. under the 2003 plan, certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options. in general, sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted. stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005, marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan. no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan. beginning in 2005, marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers. all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited. as a result, there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards. restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan. in 2005, the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package. the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant, contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment. marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees (201crestricted stock awards 201d), based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes. the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period, contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment. prior to vesting, all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon. the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent. common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan. all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units, and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors. when dividends are paid on marathon common stock, directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units. stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $80 million, $83 million and $111 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005. the total related income tax benefits were $29 million, $31 million and $39 million. in 2007 and 2006, cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $27 million and $50 million. tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $30 million and $36 million. cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $1 million and $3 million in 2007 and 2006. stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007, 2006 and 2005, marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees. the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions:. - | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 weighted average exercise price per share | $60.94 | $37.84 | $25.14 expected annual dividends per share | $0.96 | $0.80 | $0.66 expected life in years | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.5 expected volatility | 27% (27%) | 28% (28%) | 28% (28%) risk-free interest rate | 4.1% (4.1%) | 5.0% (5.0%) | 3.8% (3.8%) weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted | $17.24 | $10.19 | $6.15 . what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007? 60.94 and what was it in 2005?

25.14

republic services, inc. notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) 16. financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices. these swaps qualified for, and were designated as, effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases (fuel hedges). the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31, 2016: year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon. year | gallons hedged | weighted average contractprice per gallon 2017 | 12000000 | $2.92 2018 | 3000000 | 2.61 if the national u.s. on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon, we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price (multiplied by the notional gallons) from the counterparty. if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon, we pay the difference to the counterparty. the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets (level 2 in the fair value hierarchy). the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31, 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $2.7 million and $37.8 million, respectively, and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $0.8 million for the year ended december 31, 2016, and a loss of $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the years ended december 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and have been recorded in other income, net in our consolidated statements of income. total gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for fuel hedges (the effective portion) was $20.7 million, $(2.0) million and $(24.2) million, for the years ended december 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. we classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows. recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint. from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities. during 2016, we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales. the agreements qualified for, and were designated as, effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales (commodity hedges). we entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ. the agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price. the puts and calls have the same settlement dates, are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration. the contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars. under these agreements, we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price; however, if the settlement price is above the cap, we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged. if the settlement price is below the floor, the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged. the objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices.. how much did the gallons hedged in 2018 represent in relation to the ones hedged in 2017? 4.0 and in the previous year of this period, what was the aggregate fair value of the outstanding fuel hedges?

37.8

part ii. item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns. as of february 2, 2019, we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock. stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index, the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28, 2013 (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29, 2018 and, for each index, on the last day of the calendar year. comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems, inc., the nasdaq composite index, the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. fiscal year ending december 29. copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s, a division of s&p global. all rights reserved. nasdaq compositecadence design systems, inc. s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology. - | 12/28/2013 | 1/3/2015 | 1/2/2016 | 12/31/2016 | 12/30/2017 | 12/29/2018 cadence design systems inc. | $100.00 | $135.18 | $149.39 | $181.05 | $300.22 | $311.13 nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 112.60 | 113.64 | 133.19 | 172.11 | 165.84 s&p 500 | 100.00 | 110.28 | 109.54 | 129.05 | 157.22 | 150.33 s&p 500 information technology | 100.00 | 115.49 | 121.08 | 144.85 | 201.10 | 200.52 the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.. what is the change in price of the s&p 500 from 2015 to 2016?

18.77

middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% (0.7%) due primarily to changes in trade inventories, partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains. in the cigarette category, marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture. marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% (42.6%). in january 2013, pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally. marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family. pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011, reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount. these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands. in the machine-made large cigars category, black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points. the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011, black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies. in december 2012, middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013. the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31, 2011 with the year ended december 31, 2010. net revenues, which include excise taxes billed to customers, decreased $221 million (1.0% (1.0%)) due to lower shipment volume ($1051 million), partially offset by higher net pricing ($830 million), which includes higher promotional investments. operating companies income increased $119 million (2.1% (2.1%)), due primarily to higher net pricing ($831 million), which includes higher promotional investments, marketing, administration, and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ($198 million) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus, north carolina manufacturing facility ($75 million), partially offset by lower volume ($527 million), higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ($158 million), higher per unit settlement charges ($120 million), higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ($87 million) and higher fda user fees ($73 million). for 2011, total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% (4.0%) versus 2010. pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% (4.0%) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day, partially offset by changes in trade inventories. after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day, pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% (4%) versus 2010. pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% (3.5%) versus 2010, when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day. pm usa's total premium brands (marlboro and other premium brands) shipment volume decreased 4.3% (4.3%). marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% (3.8%) versus 2010. in the discount brands, pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% (0.9%). pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% (93.7%) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011, down from 93.9% (93.9%) in 2010. middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010. for 2011, pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% (49.0%) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro. marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points. in 2010, marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels. middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category, with a retail share of approximately 84% (84%) in 2011. for 2011, middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% (29.7%) versus 2010. black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points, as the brand benefited from new product introductions. during the fourth quarter of 2011, middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine. this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties. during the second quarter of 2011, middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas. middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically. smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing, copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management. the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance: shipment volume for the years ended december 31. (cans and packs in millions) | shipment volumefor the years ended december 31, 2012 | shipment volumefor the years ended december 31, 2011 | shipment volumefor the years ended december 31, 2010 copenhagen | 392.5 | 354.2 | 327.5 skoal | 288.4 | 286.8 | 274.4 copenhagenandskoal | 680.9 | 641.0 | 601.9 other | 82.4 | 93.6 | 122.5 total smokeless products | 763.3 | 734.6 | 724.4 volume includes cans and packs sold, as well as promotional units, but excludes international volume, which is not material to the smokeless products segment. other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products. new types of smokeless products, as well as new packaging configurations. what was the difference in total shipment volume between 2010 and 2011?

10.2