Datasets:

Erland

/

NLP701_Assignment2_Subtask3_KTO_Dataset_4

like 0

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Ukraine War: Kyiv’s allies fear military support will dry up in US election year Ukraine’s Western allies are concerned that the military support for Kyiv may soon peak, as the US enters a divisive presidential, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing unnamed Western officials. “Ukraine’s allies fear military support for its battle against Russia is nearing a peak, with senior European officials increasingly concerned about the flow of aid next year as the US enters a divisive presidential campaign,” the Financial Times reported. According to the FT, Washington has been Kyiv’s major source of military aid. US officials interviewed by the newspaper say the remaining funds preapproved by Congress could sustain Ukraine for about another five months. Western officials in regular contact with the US over Ukraine told the FT that Washington sees that period of time as the last real chance for Kyiv to change the situation on the ground. “We can’t keep the same level of assistance forever,” a European official told the British newspaper as he argued that the current level of support could be sustained for another year or possibly two years but no more. Politico reported earlier this week that only $6 billion of the original $48 billion military aid package that the US had approved previously now remains. According to the US publication, Washington’s funds for Kyiv may be fully allocated by mid-summer. European allies are increasingly uncertain about whether the US will come close to matching its existing $48bn package, adopted in 2022, particularly as it requires a vote in Congress this autumn against the backdrop of more partisan debate on the war, FT reported. Recently, European leaders promised Zelenskyy an arsenal of missiles, tanks and drones during a whirlwind three-day visit to Italy, the Vatican, Germany, France and the U.K. that sought to replenish Ukraine’s depleted weapons supplies ahead of a long-anticipated spring offensive aimed at turning the tide of the war. Zelenskyy’s energetic international diplomacy over 15 months of war has persuaded Ukraine’s Western allies to send ever more powerful weapons, from German Leopard tanks to U.S. Patriot missile systems and Storm Shadow cruise missiles from the U.K. The war in Ukraine that began a year ago has killed thousands, forced millions to flee their homes, reduced entire cities to rubble and has fuelled fears the confrontation could slide into an open conflict between Russia and NATO. With inputs from agencies. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys the narrative that Ukraine's Western allies are unwilling to provide further military support, fostering a situation of uncertainty about Kyiv's military future. This idea is attributed to the upcoming US elections as well as the fact that military support is deemed insufficient.

EN_UA_015443.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine

The text presents several paragraphs in which Ukraine's allies are depicted as weak or reluctant to provide further military help. These claims are justified by the upcoming US elections as well as the fact there are no enough funds.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Ukraine War: Kyiv’s allies fear military support will dry up in US election year Ukraine’s Western allies are concerned that the military support for Kyiv may soon peak, as the US enters a divisive presidential, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing unnamed Western officials. “Ukraine’s allies fear military support for its battle against Russia is nearing a peak, with senior European officials increasingly concerned about the flow of aid next year as the US enters a divisive presidential campaign,” the Financial Times reported. According to the FT, Washington has been Kyiv’s major source of military aid. US officials interviewed by the newspaper say the remaining funds preapproved by Congress could sustain Ukraine for about another five months. Western officials in regular contact with the US over Ukraine told the FT that Washington sees that period of time as the last real chance for Kyiv to change the situation on the ground. “We can’t keep the same level of assistance forever,” a European official told the British newspaper as he argued that the current level of support could be sustained for another year or possibly two years but no more. Politico reported earlier this week that only $6 billion of the original $48 billion military aid package that the US had approved previously now remains. According to the US publication, Washington’s funds for Kyiv may be fully allocated by mid-summer. European allies are increasingly uncertain about whether the US will come close to matching its existing $48bn package, adopted in 2022, particularly as it requires a vote in Congress this autumn against the backdrop of more partisan debate on the war, FT reported. Recently, European leaders promised Zelenskyy an arsenal of missiles, tanks and drones during a whirlwind three-day visit to Italy, the Vatican, Germany, France and the U.K. that sought to replenish Ukraine’s depleted weapons supplies ahead of a long-anticipated spring offensive aimed at turning the tide of the war. Zelenskyy’s energetic international diplomacy over 15 months of war has persuaded Ukraine’s Western allies to send ever more powerful weapons, from German Leopard tanks to U.S. Patriot missile systems and Storm Shadow cruise missiles from the U.K. The war in Ukraine that began a year ago has killed thousands, forced millions to flee their homes, reduced entire cities to rubble and has fuelled fears the confrontation could slide into an open conflict between Russia and NATO. With inputs from agencies. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article claims Ukraine's allies are withdrawing their military support, having second thoughts about providing further aid, citing US officials who say there is not enough funds as well as the upcoming US elections

EN_UA_015443.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine

The text presents several paragraphs in which Ukraine's allies are depicted as weak or reluctant to provide further military help. These claims are justified by the upcoming US elections as well as the fact there are no enough funds.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Ukraine War: Kyiv’s allies fear military support will dry up in US election year Ukraine’s Western allies are concerned that the military support for Kyiv may soon peak, as the US enters a divisive presidential, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing unnamed Western officials. “Ukraine’s allies fear military support for its battle against Russia is nearing a peak, with senior European officials increasingly concerned about the flow of aid next year as the US enters a divisive presidential campaign,” the Financial Times reported. According to the FT, Washington has been Kyiv’s major source of military aid. US officials interviewed by the newspaper say the remaining funds preapproved by Congress could sustain Ukraine for about another five months. Western officials in regular contact with the US over Ukraine told the FT that Washington sees that period of time as the last real chance for Kyiv to change the situation on the ground. “We can’t keep the same level of assistance forever,” a European official told the British newspaper as he argued that the current level of support could be sustained for another year or possibly two years but no more. Politico reported earlier this week that only $6 billion of the original $48 billion military aid package that the US had approved previously now remains. According to the US publication, Washington’s funds for Kyiv may be fully allocated by mid-summer. European allies are increasingly uncertain about whether the US will come close to matching its existing $48bn package, adopted in 2022, particularly as it requires a vote in Congress this autumn against the backdrop of more partisan debate on the war, FT reported. Recently, European leaders promised Zelenskyy an arsenal of missiles, tanks and drones during a whirlwind three-day visit to Italy, the Vatican, Germany, France and the U.K. that sought to replenish Ukraine’s depleted weapons supplies ahead of a long-anticipated spring offensive aimed at turning the tide of the war. Zelenskyy’s energetic international diplomacy over 15 months of war has persuaded Ukraine’s Western allies to send ever more powerful weapons, from German Leopard tanks to U.S. Patriot missile systems and Storm Shadow cruise missiles from the U.K. The war in Ukraine that began a year ago has killed thousands, forced millions to flee their homes, reduced entire cities to rubble and has fuelled fears the confrontation could slide into an open conflict between Russia and NATO. With inputs from agencies. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, Ukraine's Western allies are presented as reluctant to provide further military aid, citing both economic as well as political reasons.

EN_UA_015443.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine

The text presents several paragraphs in which Ukraine's allies are depicted as weak or reluctant to provide further military help. These claims are justified by the upcoming US elections as well as the fact there are no enough funds.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Ukraine War: Kyiv’s allies fear military support will dry up in US election year Ukraine’s Western allies are concerned that the military support for Kyiv may soon peak, as the US enters a divisive presidential, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing unnamed Western officials. “Ukraine’s allies fear military support for its battle against Russia is nearing a peak, with senior European officials increasingly concerned about the flow of aid next year as the US enters a divisive presidential campaign,” the Financial Times reported. According to the FT, Washington has been Kyiv’s major source of military aid. US officials interviewed by the newspaper say the remaining funds preapproved by Congress could sustain Ukraine for about another five months. Western officials in regular contact with the US over Ukraine told the FT that Washington sees that period of time as the last real chance for Kyiv to change the situation on the ground. “We can’t keep the same level of assistance forever,” a European official told the British newspaper as he argued that the current level of support could be sustained for another year or possibly two years but no more. Politico reported earlier this week that only $6 billion of the original $48 billion military aid package that the US had approved previously now remains. According to the US publication, Washington’s funds for Kyiv may be fully allocated by mid-summer. European allies are increasingly uncertain about whether the US will come close to matching its existing $48bn package, adopted in 2022, particularly as it requires a vote in Congress this autumn against the backdrop of more partisan debate on the war, FT reported. Recently, European leaders promised Zelenskyy an arsenal of missiles, tanks and drones during a whirlwind three-day visit to Italy, the Vatican, Germany, France and the U.K. that sought to replenish Ukraine’s depleted weapons supplies ahead of a long-anticipated spring offensive aimed at turning the tide of the war. Zelenskyy’s energetic international diplomacy over 15 months of war has persuaded Ukraine’s Western allies to send ever more powerful weapons, from German Leopard tanks to U.S. Patriot missile systems and Storm Shadow cruise missiles from the U.K. The war in Ukraine that began a year ago has killed thousands, forced millions to flee their homes, reduced entire cities to rubble and has fuelled fears the confrontation could slide into an open conflict between Russia and NATO. With inputs from agencies. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article suggests that Western allies of Ukraine are reluctant to provide further military help. They are argued to consider the current support to be unsustainable over the long term.

EN_UA_015443.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine

The text presents several paragraphs in which Ukraine's allies are depicted as weak or reluctant to provide further military help. These claims are justified by the upcoming US elections as well as the fact there are no enough funds.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Ukraine War: Kyiv’s allies fear military support will dry up in US election year Ukraine’s Western allies are concerned that the military support for Kyiv may soon peak, as the US enters a divisive presidential, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing unnamed Western officials. “Ukraine’s allies fear military support for its battle against Russia is nearing a peak, with senior European officials increasingly concerned about the flow of aid next year as the US enters a divisive presidential campaign,” the Financial Times reported. According to the FT, Washington has been Kyiv’s major source of military aid. US officials interviewed by the newspaper say the remaining funds preapproved by Congress could sustain Ukraine for about another five months. Western officials in regular contact with the US over Ukraine told the FT that Washington sees that period of time as the last real chance for Kyiv to change the situation on the ground. “We can’t keep the same level of assistance forever,” a European official told the British newspaper as he argued that the current level of support could be sustained for another year or possibly two years but no more. Politico reported earlier this week that only $6 billion of the original $48 billion military aid package that the US had approved previously now remains. According to the US publication, Washington’s funds for Kyiv may be fully allocated by mid-summer. European allies are increasingly uncertain about whether the US will come close to matching its existing $48bn package, adopted in 2022, particularly as it requires a vote in Congress this autumn against the backdrop of more partisan debate on the war, FT reported. Recently, European leaders promised Zelenskyy an arsenal of missiles, tanks and drones during a whirlwind three-day visit to Italy, the Vatican, Germany, France and the U.K. that sought to replenish Ukraine’s depleted weapons supplies ahead of a long-anticipated spring offensive aimed at turning the tide of the war. Zelenskyy’s energetic international diplomacy over 15 months of war has persuaded Ukraine’s Western allies to send ever more powerful weapons, from German Leopard tanks to U.S. Patriot missile systems and Storm Shadow cruise missiles from the U.K. The war in Ukraine that began a year ago has killed thousands, forced millions to flee their homes, reduced entire cities to rubble and has fuelled fears the confrontation could slide into an open conflict between Russia and NATO. With inputs from agencies. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text reports multiple quotes saying that Ukraine's allies are increasingly reluctant to provide military help, citing the need for Congressional approval as well as the upcoming elections as reasons.

EN_UA_015443.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine

The text presents several paragraphs in which Ukraine's allies are depicted as weak or reluctant to provide further military help. These claims are justified by the upcoming US elections as well as the fact there are no enough funds.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Has Omnibus Bill, Packed With Climate Change Policies, Flown By Private Jet to Virgin Islands While the liberal elite continue to lecture ordinary people about carbon emissions, the 4,000 page Omnibus Bill, which is packed with expensive climate change initiatives, is being transported by private jet to Biden’s holiday home in the US Virgin Islands. “This is the optics of climate politics, especially when the climate envoy John Kerry takes a flight like this. The White House, they’ve used what’s called an auto-pen before, when presidents have been on trips and have to sign something,” said Fox News host Bill Hammer. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Comedian and Fox News contributor Tom Shillue said the hypocritical maneuver is an example of Democrats rubbing our faces in it. “Remember that movie, Love Story, with Ally McGrath? Love means never having to say you’re sorry. This is how Democrats approach politics.” Watch: Climate change policy is largely theater and sending the $1.4 trillion Omnibus Bill on international private jet trips makes a mockery of the entire climate change movement. Climate change activist Bill Gates was caught admitting the climate change agenda is a giant scam for the New World Order in a newly surfaced video in which he boasts that the term “clean energy” has “screwed up people’s minds.” According to Gates, who was speaking to an audience of his inner circle in 2018, wind, solar, battery technology and other renewable energy sources might be fashionable, but they are NOT capable of solving climate change. Watch: </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article highlights several paragraphs attacking climate movement's key activists for hypocritical attitude toward climate policy since they use private jets while at the same time pushing green agenda

EN_CC_100047.txt

CC: Criticism of climate movement

CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists

The author says that climate movement is a scam because elites teach us about climate responsibility while using private jets.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Has Omnibus Bill, Packed With Climate Change Policies, Flown By Private Jet to Virgin Islands While the liberal elite continue to lecture ordinary people about carbon emissions, the 4,000 page Omnibus Bill, which is packed with expensive climate change initiatives, is being transported by private jet to Biden’s holiday home in the US Virgin Islands. “This is the optics of climate politics, especially when the climate envoy John Kerry takes a flight like this. The White House, they’ve used what’s called an auto-pen before, when presidents have been on trips and have to sign something,” said Fox News host Bill Hammer. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Comedian and Fox News contributor Tom Shillue said the hypocritical maneuver is an example of Democrats rubbing our faces in it. “Remember that movie, Love Story, with Ally McGrath? Love means never having to say you’re sorry. This is how Democrats approach politics.” Watch: Climate change policy is largely theater and sending the $1.4 trillion Omnibus Bill on international private jet trips makes a mockery of the entire climate change movement. Climate change activist Bill Gates was caught admitting the climate change agenda is a giant scam for the New World Order in a newly surfaced video in which he boasts that the term “clean energy” has “screwed up people’s minds.” According to Gates, who was speaking to an audience of his inner circle in 2018, wind, solar, battery technology and other renewable energy sources might be fashionable, but they are NOT capable of solving climate change. Watch: </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks prominent activists of the climate movement calling them hypocrites for using fossil fuels while promoting them

EN_CC_100047.txt

CC: Criticism of climate movement

CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists

The author says that climate movement is a scam because elites teach us about climate responsibility while using private jets.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Has Omnibus Bill, Packed With Climate Change Policies, Flown By Private Jet to Virgin Islands While the liberal elite continue to lecture ordinary people about carbon emissions, the 4,000 page Omnibus Bill, which is packed with expensive climate change initiatives, is being transported by private jet to Biden’s holiday home in the US Virgin Islands. “This is the optics of climate politics, especially when the climate envoy John Kerry takes a flight like this. The White House, they’ve used what’s called an auto-pen before, when presidents have been on trips and have to sign something,” said Fox News host Bill Hammer. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Comedian and Fox News contributor Tom Shillue said the hypocritical maneuver is an example of Democrats rubbing our faces in it. “Remember that movie, Love Story, with Ally McGrath? Love means never having to say you’re sorry. This is how Democrats approach politics.” Watch: Climate change policy is largely theater and sending the $1.4 trillion Omnibus Bill on international private jet trips makes a mockery of the entire climate change movement. Climate change activist Bill Gates was caught admitting the climate change agenda is a giant scam for the New World Order in a newly surfaced video in which he boasts that the term “clean energy” has “screwed up people’s minds.” According to Gates, who was speaking to an audience of his inner circle in 2018, wind, solar, battery technology and other renewable energy sources might be fashionable, but they are NOT capable of solving climate change. Watch: </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks climate movement underlining alleged hypocrisy of key figures.

EN_CC_100047.txt

CC: Criticism of climate movement

CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists

The author says that climate movement is a scam because elites teach us about climate responsibility while using private jets.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Has Omnibus Bill, Packed With Climate Change Policies, Flown By Private Jet to Virgin Islands While the liberal elite continue to lecture ordinary people about carbon emissions, the 4,000 page Omnibus Bill, which is packed with expensive climate change initiatives, is being transported by private jet to Biden’s holiday home in the US Virgin Islands. “This is the optics of climate politics, especially when the climate envoy John Kerry takes a flight like this. The White House, they’ve used what’s called an auto-pen before, when presidents have been on trips and have to sign something,” said Fox News host Bill Hammer. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Comedian and Fox News contributor Tom Shillue said the hypocritical maneuver is an example of Democrats rubbing our faces in it. “Remember that movie, Love Story, with Ally McGrath? Love means never having to say you’re sorry. This is how Democrats approach politics.” Watch: Climate change policy is largely theater and sending the $1.4 trillion Omnibus Bill on international private jet trips makes a mockery of the entire climate change movement. Climate change activist Bill Gates was caught admitting the climate change agenda is a giant scam for the New World Order in a newly surfaced video in which he boasts that the term “clean energy” has “screwed up people’s minds.” According to Gates, who was speaking to an audience of his inner circle in 2018, wind, solar, battery technology and other renewable energy sources might be fashionable, but they are NOT capable of solving climate change. Watch: </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article highlights hypocrisy of climate movement. According to article, climate change agenda is a scam

EN_CC_100047.txt

CC: Criticism of climate movement

CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists

The author says that climate movement is a scam because elites teach us about climate responsibility while using private jets.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Biden Has Omnibus Bill, Packed With Climate Change Policies, Flown By Private Jet to Virgin Islands While the liberal elite continue to lecture ordinary people about carbon emissions, the 4,000 page Omnibus Bill, which is packed with expensive climate change initiatives, is being transported by private jet to Biden’s holiday home in the US Virgin Islands. “This is the optics of climate politics, especially when the climate envoy John Kerry takes a flight like this. The White House, they’ve used what’s called an auto-pen before, when presidents have been on trips and have to sign something,” said Fox News host Bill Hammer. BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use Latest Video Comedian and Fox News contributor Tom Shillue said the hypocritical maneuver is an example of Democrats rubbing our faces in it. “Remember that movie, Love Story, with Ally McGrath? Love means never having to say you’re sorry. This is how Democrats approach politics.” Watch: Climate change policy is largely theater and sending the $1.4 trillion Omnibus Bill on international private jet trips makes a mockery of the entire climate change movement. Climate change activist Bill Gates was caught admitting the climate change agenda is a giant scam for the New World Order in a newly surfaced video in which he boasts that the term “clean energy” has “screwed up people’s minds.” According to Gates, who was speaking to an audience of his inner circle in 2018, wind, solar, battery technology and other renewable energy sources might be fashionable, but they are NOT capable of solving climate change. Watch: </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise climate movements underlining how hypocritical some key activists are

EN_CC_100047.txt

CC: Criticism of climate movement

CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists

The author says that climate movement is a scam because elites teach us about climate responsibility while using private jets.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… The left has been preaching global warming, cooling, climate change, and end-of-the-world nonsense since before many of us were born. In his book An Inconvenient Truth: The Crisis of Global Warming, Al Gore attempted to persuade everyone that the globe was overheating. Democrats are always negotiating deals that place the United States at a competitive disadvantage with other countries, some of whom are our foes, such as Communist China. They manipulate children into doing their bidding by convincing them that they only have a few years to live. For them, it’s a pretty decent racket. However, there is another viewpoint. Economic observers have long known that there are no free lunches, and perhaps it’s time that electric-car fans did as well. Leftists extol Teslas and other electric cars as cure-alls for fossil fuels’ woes – even when it comes to something as simple as their tires – but disregard the tremendous environmental damage these vehicles cause. Brad Templeton, a Forbes contributor, related a story of his electric car tearing through pricey tires at breakneck speed. Despite praising the many advantages of electric vehicles over traditional internal combustion engines, Templeton admitted that the requirement for tire replacement at short intervals is an inconvenient downside. “The doozy was needing new tires at around 28,000 miles,” Temple writes in “Electric Vehicle Maintenance Is Super-Cheap, But The Dark Secret Is Tires” from last month. “That was too early, far before their rated life.” “One reason for this was a stupid mistake on my part. In the past, I’ve taken my gasoline cars in for regular service, and they were rotating my tires as needed during this service. Not taking my EV in for service, I never got the rotation done. That not only meant the drive tires of my car wore out faster, it also meant I could not make a warranty claim on them. Lesson learned.” Electric vehicles do incur charges for what is classified as a repair rather than maintenance. Many Tesla 12v batteries have been reported to fail, albeit most are still under warranty. If you chip a windshield, bang a mirror, or get a car burglary, parts for premium cars are always pricey. He admits that neglecting to rotate the tires properly may have been his fault, but he contends that the added weight of his electric car, along with the necessity for high-efficiency, low-noise tires, meant an expensive purchase was always on the horizon. Apart from that, he characterizes the advantages of owning an electric vehicle as a world of guilt-free driving. Like Pete Buttigieg, who urged average Americans to buy electric cars to avoid high gas costs while ignoring the $56,000 price tag, which has already proven to be a money trap. Nonetheless, in light of this revelation, it appears that the tradeoff of electric vehicles – fewer environmental impacts for a higher price – is having the opposite effect. Regular tread replacement will have an impact on the environment, both because of the fossil fuels required to manufacture them and because wear and tear contribute more harmful microplastics to the environment. Given that modern tires contain petroleum-based plastics, a car tire requires between 7 and 22 gallons of oil to manufacture, according to a National Geographic article. Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green”? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/iahDDqZRls — Patrick De Haan ⛽️📊 (@GasBuddyGuy) November 11, 2021 Microplastics become embedded in shrimp gills and guts, according to a study conducted by John Weinstein, a professor of physiology at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. “Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel, and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green?” Author Patrick De Haan wrote of the deadly bargain greenies have made with batteries made from land-scarred processes. While proponents of electric vehicles argue that they are better for the environment, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and environmental costs are rising faster than ever before. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article reporting the issues of Tesla cars in terms of being bad for the environment, highlighting the use of rare earth metals, manufacturing processes of batteries, tyres which require a lot of resources and thus have an environmental cost themselves.

EN_CC_100004.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The article talks about how TESLA is not reliable as it needs frequent maintenance which is actually worse for the environment, and how costly it is.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… The left has been preaching global warming, cooling, climate change, and end-of-the-world nonsense since before many of us were born. In his book An Inconvenient Truth: The Crisis of Global Warming, Al Gore attempted to persuade everyone that the globe was overheating. Democrats are always negotiating deals that place the United States at a competitive disadvantage with other countries, some of whom are our foes, such as Communist China. They manipulate children into doing their bidding by convincing them that they only have a few years to live. For them, it’s a pretty decent racket. However, there is another viewpoint. Economic observers have long known that there are no free lunches, and perhaps it’s time that electric-car fans did as well. Leftists extol Teslas and other electric cars as cure-alls for fossil fuels’ woes – even when it comes to something as simple as their tires – but disregard the tremendous environmental damage these vehicles cause. Brad Templeton, a Forbes contributor, related a story of his electric car tearing through pricey tires at breakneck speed. Despite praising the many advantages of electric vehicles over traditional internal combustion engines, Templeton admitted that the requirement for tire replacement at short intervals is an inconvenient downside. “The doozy was needing new tires at around 28,000 miles,” Temple writes in “Electric Vehicle Maintenance Is Super-Cheap, But The Dark Secret Is Tires” from last month. “That was too early, far before their rated life.” “One reason for this was a stupid mistake on my part. In the past, I’ve taken my gasoline cars in for regular service, and they were rotating my tires as needed during this service. Not taking my EV in for service, I never got the rotation done. That not only meant the drive tires of my car wore out faster, it also meant I could not make a warranty claim on them. Lesson learned.” Electric vehicles do incur charges for what is classified as a repair rather than maintenance. Many Tesla 12v batteries have been reported to fail, albeit most are still under warranty. If you chip a windshield, bang a mirror, or get a car burglary, parts for premium cars are always pricey. He admits that neglecting to rotate the tires properly may have been his fault, but he contends that the added weight of his electric car, along with the necessity for high-efficiency, low-noise tires, meant an expensive purchase was always on the horizon. Apart from that, he characterizes the advantages of owning an electric vehicle as a world of guilt-free driving. Like Pete Buttigieg, who urged average Americans to buy electric cars to avoid high gas costs while ignoring the $56,000 price tag, which has already proven to be a money trap. Nonetheless, in light of this revelation, it appears that the tradeoff of electric vehicles – fewer environmental impacts for a higher price – is having the opposite effect. Regular tread replacement will have an impact on the environment, both because of the fossil fuels required to manufacture them and because wear and tear contribute more harmful microplastics to the environment. Given that modern tires contain petroleum-based plastics, a car tire requires between 7 and 22 gallons of oil to manufacture, according to a National Geographic article. Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green”? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/iahDDqZRls — Patrick De Haan ⛽️📊 (@GasBuddyGuy) November 11, 2021 Microplastics become embedded in shrimp gills and guts, according to a study conducted by John Weinstein, a professor of physiology at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. “Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel, and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green?” Author Patrick De Haan wrote of the deadly bargain greenies have made with batteries made from land-scarred processes. While proponents of electric vehicles argue that they are better for the environment, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and environmental costs are rising faster than ever before. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises the use of electric cars highlighting that their components and production is detrimental to the environment

EN_CC_100004.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The article talks about how TESLA is not reliable as it needs frequent maintenance which is actually worse for the environment, and how costly it is.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… The left has been preaching global warming, cooling, climate change, and end-of-the-world nonsense since before many of us were born. In his book An Inconvenient Truth: The Crisis of Global Warming, Al Gore attempted to persuade everyone that the globe was overheating. Democrats are always negotiating deals that place the United States at a competitive disadvantage with other countries, some of whom are our foes, such as Communist China. They manipulate children into doing their bidding by convincing them that they only have a few years to live. For them, it’s a pretty decent racket. However, there is another viewpoint. Economic observers have long known that there are no free lunches, and perhaps it’s time that electric-car fans did as well. Leftists extol Teslas and other electric cars as cure-alls for fossil fuels’ woes – even when it comes to something as simple as their tires – but disregard the tremendous environmental damage these vehicles cause. Brad Templeton, a Forbes contributor, related a story of his electric car tearing through pricey tires at breakneck speed. Despite praising the many advantages of electric vehicles over traditional internal combustion engines, Templeton admitted that the requirement for tire replacement at short intervals is an inconvenient downside. “The doozy was needing new tires at around 28,000 miles,” Temple writes in “Electric Vehicle Maintenance Is Super-Cheap, But The Dark Secret Is Tires” from last month. “That was too early, far before their rated life.” “One reason for this was a stupid mistake on my part. In the past, I’ve taken my gasoline cars in for regular service, and they were rotating my tires as needed during this service. Not taking my EV in for service, I never got the rotation done. That not only meant the drive tires of my car wore out faster, it also meant I could not make a warranty claim on them. Lesson learned.” Electric vehicles do incur charges for what is classified as a repair rather than maintenance. Many Tesla 12v batteries have been reported to fail, albeit most are still under warranty. If you chip a windshield, bang a mirror, or get a car burglary, parts for premium cars are always pricey. He admits that neglecting to rotate the tires properly may have been his fault, but he contends that the added weight of his electric car, along with the necessity for high-efficiency, low-noise tires, meant an expensive purchase was always on the horizon. Apart from that, he characterizes the advantages of owning an electric vehicle as a world of guilt-free driving. Like Pete Buttigieg, who urged average Americans to buy electric cars to avoid high gas costs while ignoring the $56,000 price tag, which has already proven to be a money trap. Nonetheless, in light of this revelation, it appears that the tradeoff of electric vehicles – fewer environmental impacts for a higher price – is having the opposite effect. Regular tread replacement will have an impact on the environment, both because of the fossil fuels required to manufacture them and because wear and tear contribute more harmful microplastics to the environment. Given that modern tires contain petroleum-based plastics, a car tire requires between 7 and 22 gallons of oil to manufacture, according to a National Geographic article. Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green”? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/iahDDqZRls — Patrick De Haan ⛽️📊 (@GasBuddyGuy) November 11, 2021 Microplastics become embedded in shrimp gills and guts, according to a study conducted by John Weinstein, a professor of physiology at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. “Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel, and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green?” Author Patrick De Haan wrote of the deadly bargain greenies have made with batteries made from land-scarred processes. While proponents of electric vehicles argue that they are better for the environment, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and environmental costs are rising faster than ever before. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has multiple paragraphs criticising electric cars and green technologies. The main arguments used are the high costs and environmental impacts related to these technologies.

EN_CC_100004.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The article talks about how TESLA is not reliable as it needs frequent maintenance which is actually worse for the environment, and how costly it is.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… The left has been preaching global warming, cooling, climate change, and end-of-the-world nonsense since before many of us were born. In his book An Inconvenient Truth: The Crisis of Global Warming, Al Gore attempted to persuade everyone that the globe was overheating. Democrats are always negotiating deals that place the United States at a competitive disadvantage with other countries, some of whom are our foes, such as Communist China. They manipulate children into doing their bidding by convincing them that they only have a few years to live. For them, it’s a pretty decent racket. However, there is another viewpoint. Economic observers have long known that there are no free lunches, and perhaps it’s time that electric-car fans did as well. Leftists extol Teslas and other electric cars as cure-alls for fossil fuels’ woes – even when it comes to something as simple as their tires – but disregard the tremendous environmental damage these vehicles cause. Brad Templeton, a Forbes contributor, related a story of his electric car tearing through pricey tires at breakneck speed. Despite praising the many advantages of electric vehicles over traditional internal combustion engines, Templeton admitted that the requirement for tire replacement at short intervals is an inconvenient downside. “The doozy was needing new tires at around 28,000 miles,” Temple writes in “Electric Vehicle Maintenance Is Super-Cheap, But The Dark Secret Is Tires” from last month. “That was too early, far before their rated life.” “One reason for this was a stupid mistake on my part. In the past, I’ve taken my gasoline cars in for regular service, and they were rotating my tires as needed during this service. Not taking my EV in for service, I never got the rotation done. That not only meant the drive tires of my car wore out faster, it also meant I could not make a warranty claim on them. Lesson learned.” Electric vehicles do incur charges for what is classified as a repair rather than maintenance. Many Tesla 12v batteries have been reported to fail, albeit most are still under warranty. If you chip a windshield, bang a mirror, or get a car burglary, parts for premium cars are always pricey. He admits that neglecting to rotate the tires properly may have been his fault, but he contends that the added weight of his electric car, along with the necessity for high-efficiency, low-noise tires, meant an expensive purchase was always on the horizon. Apart from that, he characterizes the advantages of owning an electric vehicle as a world of guilt-free driving. Like Pete Buttigieg, who urged average Americans to buy electric cars to avoid high gas costs while ignoring the $56,000 price tag, which has already proven to be a money trap. Nonetheless, in light of this revelation, it appears that the tradeoff of electric vehicles – fewer environmental impacts for a higher price – is having the opposite effect. Regular tread replacement will have an impact on the environment, both because of the fossil fuels required to manufacture them and because wear and tear contribute more harmful microplastics to the environment. Given that modern tires contain petroleum-based plastics, a car tire requires between 7 and 22 gallons of oil to manufacture, according to a National Geographic article. Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green”? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/iahDDqZRls — Patrick De Haan ⛽️📊 (@GasBuddyGuy) November 11, 2021 Microplastics become embedded in shrimp gills and guts, according to a study conducted by John Weinstein, a professor of physiology at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. “Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel, and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green?” Author Patrick De Haan wrote of the deadly bargain greenies have made with batteries made from land-scarred processes. While proponents of electric vehicles argue that they are better for the environment, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and environmental costs are rising faster than ever before. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author criticizes Tesla and electric cars pointing out several flaws with the technology, including the environmental damage caused by the need for tire replacement

EN_CC_100004.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The article talks about how TESLA is not reliable as it needs frequent maintenance which is actually worse for the environment, and how costly it is.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… A Tesla Owner Just Exposed A Sick Secret About Electric Cars… The left has been preaching global warming, cooling, climate change, and end-of-the-world nonsense since before many of us were born. In his book An Inconvenient Truth: The Crisis of Global Warming, Al Gore attempted to persuade everyone that the globe was overheating. Democrats are always negotiating deals that place the United States at a competitive disadvantage with other countries, some of whom are our foes, such as Communist China. They manipulate children into doing their bidding by convincing them that they only have a few years to live. For them, it’s a pretty decent racket. However, there is another viewpoint. Economic observers have long known that there are no free lunches, and perhaps it’s time that electric-car fans did as well. Leftists extol Teslas and other electric cars as cure-alls for fossil fuels’ woes – even when it comes to something as simple as their tires – but disregard the tremendous environmental damage these vehicles cause. Brad Templeton, a Forbes contributor, related a story of his electric car tearing through pricey tires at breakneck speed. Despite praising the many advantages of electric vehicles over traditional internal combustion engines, Templeton admitted that the requirement for tire replacement at short intervals is an inconvenient downside. “The doozy was needing new tires at around 28,000 miles,” Temple writes in “Electric Vehicle Maintenance Is Super-Cheap, But The Dark Secret Is Tires” from last month. “That was too early, far before their rated life.” “One reason for this was a stupid mistake on my part. In the past, I’ve taken my gasoline cars in for regular service, and they were rotating my tires as needed during this service. Not taking my EV in for service, I never got the rotation done. That not only meant the drive tires of my car wore out faster, it also meant I could not make a warranty claim on them. Lesson learned.” Electric vehicles do incur charges for what is classified as a repair rather than maintenance. Many Tesla 12v batteries have been reported to fail, albeit most are still under warranty. If you chip a windshield, bang a mirror, or get a car burglary, parts for premium cars are always pricey. He admits that neglecting to rotate the tires properly may have been his fault, but he contends that the added weight of his electric car, along with the necessity for high-efficiency, low-noise tires, meant an expensive purchase was always on the horizon. Apart from that, he characterizes the advantages of owning an electric vehicle as a world of guilt-free driving. Like Pete Buttigieg, who urged average Americans to buy electric cars to avoid high gas costs while ignoring the $56,000 price tag, which has already proven to be a money trap. Nonetheless, in light of this revelation, it appears that the tradeoff of electric vehicles – fewer environmental impacts for a higher price – is having the opposite effect. Regular tread replacement will have an impact on the environment, both because of the fossil fuels required to manufacture them and because wear and tear contribute more harmful microplastics to the environment. Given that modern tires contain petroleum-based plastics, a car tire requires between 7 and 22 gallons of oil to manufacture, according to a National Geographic article. Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green”? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/iahDDqZRls — Patrick De Haan ⛽️📊 (@GasBuddyGuy) November 11, 2021 Microplastics become embedded in shrimp gills and guts, according to a study conducted by John Weinstein, a professor of physiology at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. “Somehow, one of these is frowned upon (tar sands), but the other three- cobalt, nickel, and lithium mines (necessary for EV batteries) are “green?” Author Patrick De Haan wrote of the deadly bargain greenies have made with batteries made from land-scarred processes. While proponents of electric vehicles argue that they are better for the environment, it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and environmental costs are rising faster than ever before. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises electric vehicles underling their high maintenance costs that ultimately defeat the purpose of choosing an eco-friendly car, suggesting that the tradeoff is not worth it.

EN_CC_100004.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The article talks about how TESLA is not reliable as it needs frequent maintenance which is actually worse for the environment, and how costly it is.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> What Everyone Is Missing About the Putin/Carlson Talk by Tom Luongo, Tom Luongo: “The Vorlons say, understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth” — John Sheridan, Babylon 5 The biggest media story of 2024 so far has come and gone. Tucker Carlson interviewed Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last week. Everyone, even the Davos/UK dominated media, has put forth their opinion on it. I gave out a quick take for my Patrons the morning after just like everyone else. And like everyone else I missed the biggest takeaway from this interview. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Now, if you go through the commentary what you will mostly see is people, as always, doing what traders call “talking their book.” In other words, as opposed to dealing with the information presented and the motivations of the people involved, most media outlets and commentators put forth their opinion on whether this interview satisfied their needs from it. So, for the hardcore geopolitical types and armchair psychoanalysts, we heard a lot of opinions second-guessing Putin’s strategy to open the interview with a nearly thirty minute recitation of Russian/Ukrainian history. Why would he do this, was the common refrain. I’ll use my former-bellwether-for-normies, Scott Adams, as an example of this. How many of you thought Putin was “all there” in the Tucker interview? If he seemed lucid to you, it’s because Biden is your comparison. I thought Putin seemed unhinged. The history lesson was not a good sign. https://t.co/VZiEIHRZ2t — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) February 9, 2024 This was the kindest of the ‘bad takes’ I found on this. But I’m having one of Scott’s “One movie, two screens,” moments here. Because Putin looked anything other than “unhinged.” In fact, he looked as calm as I’ve ever seen him, taking a relaxed posture to put Carlson, who was clearly unsure of where he stood at the beginning of the interview, at ease. But this is the message that Adams wanted to see, framing Putin in relation to Biden, because he needed something unique to say to justify his even being in the conversation. By contrast, Martin Armstrong had a great post curating all of the crazy Neocon takes from the “media” on his blog over the weekend. What’s obvious from those is that they understood that Putin’s 30 minute opening monologue would put off a lot of casual watchers who would tune him out at that point. So, their “analysis” focused on steering the conversation to Putin’s ‘false history’ of Russia and Ukraine. This way that ‘false history’ would dominate everyone’s opinions the next day, managing the Overton Window of the entire interview, making it all about that. This would be the basis of how they discredit Putin. Then to discredit Carlson, people like Hillary Clinton was trotted out to lie about Tucker Carlson, calling him a “useful idiot,” and “puppy dog” and a joke in Russian media, which is an outright lie. Hillary’s harpy laugh made an appearance alongside a sycophant interviewer as they joked about Carlson’s having been fired from every legitimate news agency. We were treated to a common sight: Two Beltway insiders laughing inside their echo chamber and only our sick fascination with roadkill makes it even remotely interesting. So, the whole exercise is reframed as Puppy Dog Tucker throwing softballs to Liar Putin to distract us away from the sum and substance of their talk. I know… in other news water is wet and women want more sex when they’re fertile. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article criticises Western media for having a bad take on Putin-Tucker Carlson interview. More precisely, Western media is accused of distorting the context of Putin's words by emphasising the wrong arguments.

EN_UA_023008.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several, attacks and alleged misrepresentations of Tucker Carson's interview of Vladimir Putin are used to discredit the Western media and expose their bias anti-Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> What Everyone Is Missing About the Putin/Carlson Talk by Tom Luongo, Tom Luongo: “The Vorlons say, understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth” — John Sheridan, Babylon 5 The biggest media story of 2024 so far has come and gone. Tucker Carlson interviewed Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last week. Everyone, even the Davos/UK dominated media, has put forth their opinion on it. I gave out a quick take for my Patrons the morning after just like everyone else. And like everyone else I missed the biggest takeaway from this interview. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Now, if you go through the commentary what you will mostly see is people, as always, doing what traders call “talking their book.” In other words, as opposed to dealing with the information presented and the motivations of the people involved, most media outlets and commentators put forth their opinion on whether this interview satisfied their needs from it. So, for the hardcore geopolitical types and armchair psychoanalysts, we heard a lot of opinions second-guessing Putin’s strategy to open the interview with a nearly thirty minute recitation of Russian/Ukrainian history. Why would he do this, was the common refrain. I’ll use my former-bellwether-for-normies, Scott Adams, as an example of this. How many of you thought Putin was “all there” in the Tucker interview? If he seemed lucid to you, it’s because Biden is your comparison. I thought Putin seemed unhinged. The history lesson was not a good sign. https://t.co/VZiEIHRZ2t — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) February 9, 2024 This was the kindest of the ‘bad takes’ I found on this. But I’m having one of Scott’s “One movie, two screens,” moments here. Because Putin looked anything other than “unhinged.” In fact, he looked as calm as I’ve ever seen him, taking a relaxed posture to put Carlson, who was clearly unsure of where he stood at the beginning of the interview, at ease. But this is the message that Adams wanted to see, framing Putin in relation to Biden, because he needed something unique to say to justify his even being in the conversation. By contrast, Martin Armstrong had a great post curating all of the crazy Neocon takes from the “media” on his blog over the weekend. What’s obvious from those is that they understood that Putin’s 30 minute opening monologue would put off a lot of casual watchers who would tune him out at that point. So, their “analysis” focused on steering the conversation to Putin’s ‘false history’ of Russia and Ukraine. This way that ‘false history’ would dominate everyone’s opinions the next day, managing the Overton Window of the entire interview, making it all about that. This would be the basis of how they discredit Putin. Then to discredit Carlson, people like Hillary Clinton was trotted out to lie about Tucker Carlson, calling him a “useful idiot,” and “puppy dog” and a joke in Russian media, which is an outright lie. Hillary’s harpy laugh made an appearance alongside a sycophant interviewer as they joked about Carlson’s having been fired from every legitimate news agency. We were treated to a common sight: Two Beltway insiders laughing inside their echo chamber and only our sick fascination with roadkill makes it even remotely interesting. So, the whole exercise is reframed as Puppy Dog Tucker throwing softballs to Liar Putin to distract us away from the sum and substance of their talk. I know… in other news water is wet and women want more sex when they’re fertile. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, Western media is accused of being biased towards Ukraine and anti-Russia. Indeed, some paragraphs quote directly or indirectly Western journalists that they deem unreliable and incompetent.

EN_UA_023008.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several, attacks and alleged misrepresentations of Tucker Carson's interview of Vladimir Putin are used to discredit the Western media and expose their bias anti-Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> What Everyone Is Missing About the Putin/Carlson Talk by Tom Luongo, Tom Luongo: “The Vorlons say, understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth” — John Sheridan, Babylon 5 The biggest media story of 2024 so far has come and gone. Tucker Carlson interviewed Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last week. Everyone, even the Davos/UK dominated media, has put forth their opinion on it. I gave out a quick take for my Patrons the morning after just like everyone else. And like everyone else I missed the biggest takeaway from this interview. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Now, if you go through the commentary what you will mostly see is people, as always, doing what traders call “talking their book.” In other words, as opposed to dealing with the information presented and the motivations of the people involved, most media outlets and commentators put forth their opinion on whether this interview satisfied their needs from it. So, for the hardcore geopolitical types and armchair psychoanalysts, we heard a lot of opinions second-guessing Putin’s strategy to open the interview with a nearly thirty minute recitation of Russian/Ukrainian history. Why would he do this, was the common refrain. I’ll use my former-bellwether-for-normies, Scott Adams, as an example of this. How many of you thought Putin was “all there” in the Tucker interview? If he seemed lucid to you, it’s because Biden is your comparison. I thought Putin seemed unhinged. The history lesson was not a good sign. https://t.co/VZiEIHRZ2t — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) February 9, 2024 This was the kindest of the ‘bad takes’ I found on this. But I’m having one of Scott’s “One movie, two screens,” moments here. Because Putin looked anything other than “unhinged.” In fact, he looked as calm as I’ve ever seen him, taking a relaxed posture to put Carlson, who was clearly unsure of where he stood at the beginning of the interview, at ease. But this is the message that Adams wanted to see, framing Putin in relation to Biden, because he needed something unique to say to justify his even being in the conversation. By contrast, Martin Armstrong had a great post curating all of the crazy Neocon takes from the “media” on his blog over the weekend. What’s obvious from those is that they understood that Putin’s 30 minute opening monologue would put off a lot of casual watchers who would tune him out at that point. So, their “analysis” focused on steering the conversation to Putin’s ‘false history’ of Russia and Ukraine. This way that ‘false history’ would dominate everyone’s opinions the next day, managing the Overton Window of the entire interview, making it all about that. This would be the basis of how they discredit Putin. Then to discredit Carlson, people like Hillary Clinton was trotted out to lie about Tucker Carlson, calling him a “useful idiot,” and “puppy dog” and a joke in Russian media, which is an outright lie. Hillary’s harpy laugh made an appearance alongside a sycophant interviewer as they joked about Carlson’s having been fired from every legitimate news agency. We were treated to a common sight: Two Beltway insiders laughing inside their echo chamber and only our sick fascination with roadkill makes it even remotely interesting. So, the whole exercise is reframed as Puppy Dog Tucker throwing softballs to Liar Putin to distract us away from the sum and substance of their talk. I know… in other news water is wet and women want more sex when they’re fertile. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article attempts to discredit Western media by labelling them as promoting Russian propaganda

EN_UA_023008.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several, attacks and alleged misrepresentations of Tucker Carson's interview of Vladimir Putin are used to discredit the Western media and expose their bias anti-Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> What Everyone Is Missing About the Putin/Carlson Talk by Tom Luongo, Tom Luongo: “The Vorlons say, understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth” — John Sheridan, Babylon 5 The biggest media story of 2024 so far has come and gone. Tucker Carlson interviewed Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last week. Everyone, even the Davos/UK dominated media, has put forth their opinion on it. I gave out a quick take for my Patrons the morning after just like everyone else. And like everyone else I missed the biggest takeaway from this interview. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Now, if you go through the commentary what you will mostly see is people, as always, doing what traders call “talking their book.” In other words, as opposed to dealing with the information presented and the motivations of the people involved, most media outlets and commentators put forth their opinion on whether this interview satisfied their needs from it. So, for the hardcore geopolitical types and armchair psychoanalysts, we heard a lot of opinions second-guessing Putin’s strategy to open the interview with a nearly thirty minute recitation of Russian/Ukrainian history. Why would he do this, was the common refrain. I’ll use my former-bellwether-for-normies, Scott Adams, as an example of this. How many of you thought Putin was “all there” in the Tucker interview? If he seemed lucid to you, it’s because Biden is your comparison. I thought Putin seemed unhinged. The history lesson was not a good sign. https://t.co/VZiEIHRZ2t — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) February 9, 2024 This was the kindest of the ‘bad takes’ I found on this. But I’m having one of Scott’s “One movie, two screens,” moments here. Because Putin looked anything other than “unhinged.” In fact, he looked as calm as I’ve ever seen him, taking a relaxed posture to put Carlson, who was clearly unsure of where he stood at the beginning of the interview, at ease. But this is the message that Adams wanted to see, framing Putin in relation to Biden, because he needed something unique to say to justify his even being in the conversation. By contrast, Martin Armstrong had a great post curating all of the crazy Neocon takes from the “media” on his blog over the weekend. What’s obvious from those is that they understood that Putin’s 30 minute opening monologue would put off a lot of casual watchers who would tune him out at that point. So, their “analysis” focused on steering the conversation to Putin’s ‘false history’ of Russia and Ukraine. This way that ‘false history’ would dominate everyone’s opinions the next day, managing the Overton Window of the entire interview, making it all about that. This would be the basis of how they discredit Putin. Then to discredit Carlson, people like Hillary Clinton was trotted out to lie about Tucker Carlson, calling him a “useful idiot,” and “puppy dog” and a joke in Russian media, which is an outright lie. Hillary’s harpy laugh made an appearance alongside a sycophant interviewer as they joked about Carlson’s having been fired from every legitimate news agency. We were treated to a common sight: Two Beltway insiders laughing inside their echo chamber and only our sick fascination with roadkill makes it even remotely interesting. So, the whole exercise is reframed as Puppy Dog Tucker throwing softballs to Liar Putin to distract us away from the sum and substance of their talk. I know… in other news water is wet and women want more sex when they’re fertile. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise Western media outlets and journalists that interviewed Putin within the context of Ukraine's war, accusing them of being incompetent and unprofessional while at the same time having a negative public impact since they amplify fear among the audience.

EN_UA_023008.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several, attacks and alleged misrepresentations of Tucker Carson's interview of Vladimir Putin are used to discredit the Western media and expose their bias anti-Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> What Everyone Is Missing About the Putin/Carlson Talk by Tom Luongo, Tom Luongo: “The Vorlons say, understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth” — John Sheridan, Babylon 5 The biggest media story of 2024 so far has come and gone. Tucker Carlson interviewed Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last week. Everyone, even the Davos/UK dominated media, has put forth their opinion on it. I gave out a quick take for my Patrons the morning after just like everyone else. And like everyone else I missed the biggest takeaway from this interview. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ Now, if you go through the commentary what you will mostly see is people, as always, doing what traders call “talking their book.” In other words, as opposed to dealing with the information presented and the motivations of the people involved, most media outlets and commentators put forth their opinion on whether this interview satisfied their needs from it. So, for the hardcore geopolitical types and armchair psychoanalysts, we heard a lot of opinions second-guessing Putin’s strategy to open the interview with a nearly thirty minute recitation of Russian/Ukrainian history. Why would he do this, was the common refrain. I’ll use my former-bellwether-for-normies, Scott Adams, as an example of this. How many of you thought Putin was “all there” in the Tucker interview? If he seemed lucid to you, it’s because Biden is your comparison. I thought Putin seemed unhinged. The history lesson was not a good sign. https://t.co/VZiEIHRZ2t — Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) February 9, 2024 This was the kindest of the ‘bad takes’ I found on this. But I’m having one of Scott’s “One movie, two screens,” moments here. Because Putin looked anything other than “unhinged.” In fact, he looked as calm as I’ve ever seen him, taking a relaxed posture to put Carlson, who was clearly unsure of where he stood at the beginning of the interview, at ease. But this is the message that Adams wanted to see, framing Putin in relation to Biden, because he needed something unique to say to justify his even being in the conversation. By contrast, Martin Armstrong had a great post curating all of the crazy Neocon takes from the “media” on his blog over the weekend. What’s obvious from those is that they understood that Putin’s 30 minute opening monologue would put off a lot of casual watchers who would tune him out at that point. So, their “analysis” focused on steering the conversation to Putin’s ‘false history’ of Russia and Ukraine. This way that ‘false history’ would dominate everyone’s opinions the next day, managing the Overton Window of the entire interview, making it all about that. This would be the basis of how they discredit Putin. Then to discredit Carlson, people like Hillary Clinton was trotted out to lie about Tucker Carlson, calling him a “useful idiot,” and “puppy dog” and a joke in Russian media, which is an outright lie. Hillary’s harpy laugh made an appearance alongside a sycophant interviewer as they joked about Carlson’s having been fired from every legitimate news agency. We were treated to a common sight: Two Beltway insiders laughing inside their echo chamber and only our sick fascination with roadkill makes it even remotely interesting. So, the whole exercise is reframed as Puppy Dog Tucker throwing softballs to Liar Putin to distract us away from the sum and substance of their talk. I know… in other news water is wet and women want more sex when they’re fertile. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, Western media is discredited, depicting journalists as puppets that have no interest in doing quality journalism, but instead in pushing a narrative that is in line with Western interests.

EN_UA_023008.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several, attacks and alleged misrepresentations of Tucker Carson's interview of Vladimir Putin are used to discredit the Western media and expose their bias anti-Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Hope on bills AT last one energy giant is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks. Centrica’s grants of £250 to £750 for customers least able to pay their monstrous new gas bills are welcome. But they still won’t make much of a dent. No surprise there when the firm is donating only ten per cent of the profits from its British Gas arm. That’s a negligible fraction of Centrica’s soaring total: £1.34billion in just six months this year. It can do so much more. Read More on Energy Bills But at least it is doing something. More than can be said of Shell and BP, making scandalously vast war profits since Putin strangled the oil supply. Those who still oppose the windfall tax in these truly exceptional circumstances should think again. Most read in Opinion Bar Russians WHY should Russians be free to holiday in Britain, or Italy, or the South of France? We and the EU should ban new visas now. No, it’s not fair on those opposed to Putin. But many of them fled Russia months or years ago. Depressing surveys show huge support among the remaining population for Putin’s genocide. It is delusional to imagine those are all inaccurate. Ordinary Russians seem mostly behind wiping Ukraine and its people off the map. Our Defence Secretary Ben Wallace wants only to tighten visa rules to bar the families of oligarchs and Kremlin goons. But we should go further, as Ukraine’s President Zelensky says. Russians who can prove they have publicly opposed Putin can request asylum. The rest must know they are not welcome to travel to Europe while their country is still butchering its neighbour. We must do everything we can to turn them against their murderous dictator. Block heads BRITAIN is being suffocated by a culture of obstructionism which stops anything getting done while simultaneously seeking to regulate our lives and crush pleasure. Thanks to NIMBYs, we can’t build enough homes or power plants, nor approve a single reservoir, nor extract shale gas crucial to our energy security. The Lib Dems are shamefully proud to champion all campaigners against progress. Similarly, in Whitehall, their left-liberal civil service soulmates enjoy thwarting any radical ideas for change. Meanwhile the same group obsessively plot to dictate what ordinary people can eat and drink — and even whether to allow us a harmless flutter. A new “study”, funded by your money, urges a ban on gambling ads and sponsorship — plus intrusive checks on punters’ bank accounts. Why? Because a truly tiny proportion of the population, 0.2 per cent and falling, is addicted. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun The new PM must defund nanny-state meddlers and confront NIMBYs head-on. They are all paralysing British life. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article attacks the UK government for implementing policies which they consider are not appropriate to the situation of energy insecurity the UK is currently in.

EN_UA_103011.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

none

The text presents some paragraphs criticising the government of the UK for some energy policies as well as attack some political factions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Hope on bills AT last one energy giant is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks. Centrica’s grants of £250 to £750 for customers least able to pay their monstrous new gas bills are welcome. But they still won’t make much of a dent. No surprise there when the firm is donating only ten per cent of the profits from its British Gas arm. That’s a negligible fraction of Centrica’s soaring total: £1.34billion in just six months this year. It can do so much more. Read More on Energy Bills But at least it is doing something. More than can be said of Shell and BP, making scandalously vast war profits since Putin strangled the oil supply. Those who still oppose the windfall tax in these truly exceptional circumstances should think again. Most read in Opinion Bar Russians WHY should Russians be free to holiday in Britain, or Italy, or the South of France? We and the EU should ban new visas now. No, it’s not fair on those opposed to Putin. But many of them fled Russia months or years ago. Depressing surveys show huge support among the remaining population for Putin’s genocide. It is delusional to imagine those are all inaccurate. Ordinary Russians seem mostly behind wiping Ukraine and its people off the map. Our Defence Secretary Ben Wallace wants only to tighten visa rules to bar the families of oligarchs and Kremlin goons. But we should go further, as Ukraine’s President Zelensky says. Russians who can prove they have publicly opposed Putin can request asylum. The rest must know they are not welcome to travel to Europe while their country is still butchering its neighbour. We must do everything we can to turn them against their murderous dictator. Block heads BRITAIN is being suffocated by a culture of obstructionism which stops anything getting done while simultaneously seeking to regulate our lives and crush pleasure. Thanks to NIMBYs, we can’t build enough homes or power plants, nor approve a single reservoir, nor extract shale gas crucial to our energy security. The Lib Dems are shamefully proud to champion all campaigners against progress. Similarly, in Whitehall, their left-liberal civil service soulmates enjoy thwarting any radical ideas for change. Meanwhile the same group obsessively plot to dictate what ordinary people can eat and drink — and even whether to allow us a harmless flutter. A new “study”, funded by your money, urges a ban on gambling ads and sponsorship — plus intrusive checks on punters’ bank accounts. Why? Because a truly tiny proportion of the population, 0.2 per cent and falling, is addicted. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun The new PM must defund nanny-state meddlers and confront NIMBYs head-on. They are all paralysing British life. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about the government of the UK not doing enough to address the issue of energy bill, allowing Russian to travel freely in UK territory. It also attacks NIMBYs and the Lib Dems as well as attack left-liberals.

EN_UA_103011.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

none

The text presents some paragraphs criticising the government of the UK for some energy policies as well as attack some political factions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Hope on bills AT last one energy giant is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks. Centrica’s grants of £250 to £750 for customers least able to pay their monstrous new gas bills are welcome. But they still won’t make much of a dent. No surprise there when the firm is donating only ten per cent of the profits from its British Gas arm. That’s a negligible fraction of Centrica’s soaring total: £1.34billion in just six months this year. It can do so much more. Read More on Energy Bills But at least it is doing something. More than can be said of Shell and BP, making scandalously vast war profits since Putin strangled the oil supply. Those who still oppose the windfall tax in these truly exceptional circumstances should think again. Most read in Opinion Bar Russians WHY should Russians be free to holiday in Britain, or Italy, or the South of France? We and the EU should ban new visas now. No, it’s not fair on those opposed to Putin. But many of them fled Russia months or years ago. Depressing surveys show huge support among the remaining population for Putin’s genocide. It is delusional to imagine those are all inaccurate. Ordinary Russians seem mostly behind wiping Ukraine and its people off the map. Our Defence Secretary Ben Wallace wants only to tighten visa rules to bar the families of oligarchs and Kremlin goons. But we should go further, as Ukraine’s President Zelensky says. Russians who can prove they have publicly opposed Putin can request asylum. The rest must know they are not welcome to travel to Europe while their country is still butchering its neighbour. We must do everything we can to turn them against their murderous dictator. Block heads BRITAIN is being suffocated by a culture of obstructionism which stops anything getting done while simultaneously seeking to regulate our lives and crush pleasure. Thanks to NIMBYs, we can’t build enough homes or power plants, nor approve a single reservoir, nor extract shale gas crucial to our energy security. The Lib Dems are shamefully proud to champion all campaigners against progress. Similarly, in Whitehall, their left-liberal civil service soulmates enjoy thwarting any radical ideas for change. Meanwhile the same group obsessively plot to dictate what ordinary people can eat and drink — and even whether to allow us a harmless flutter. A new “study”, funded by your money, urges a ban on gambling ads and sponsorship — plus intrusive checks on punters’ bank accounts. Why? Because a truly tiny proportion of the population, 0.2 per cent and falling, is addicted. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun The new PM must defund nanny-state meddlers and confront NIMBYs head-on. They are all paralysing British life. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks several institutions in the UK, namely the government, the civil service, political parties, as well as companies.

EN_UA_103011.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

none

The text presents some paragraphs criticising the government of the UK for some energy policies as well as attack some political factions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Hope on bills AT last one energy giant is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks. Centrica’s grants of £250 to £750 for customers least able to pay their monstrous new gas bills are welcome. But they still won’t make much of a dent. No surprise there when the firm is donating only ten per cent of the profits from its British Gas arm. That’s a negligible fraction of Centrica’s soaring total: £1.34billion in just six months this year. It can do so much more. Read More on Energy Bills But at least it is doing something. More than can be said of Shell and BP, making scandalously vast war profits since Putin strangled the oil supply. Those who still oppose the windfall tax in these truly exceptional circumstances should think again. Most read in Opinion Bar Russians WHY should Russians be free to holiday in Britain, or Italy, or the South of France? We and the EU should ban new visas now. No, it’s not fair on those opposed to Putin. But many of them fled Russia months or years ago. Depressing surveys show huge support among the remaining population for Putin’s genocide. It is delusional to imagine those are all inaccurate. Ordinary Russians seem mostly behind wiping Ukraine and its people off the map. Our Defence Secretary Ben Wallace wants only to tighten visa rules to bar the families of oligarchs and Kremlin goons. But we should go further, as Ukraine’s President Zelensky says. Russians who can prove they have publicly opposed Putin can request asylum. The rest must know they are not welcome to travel to Europe while their country is still butchering its neighbour. We must do everything we can to turn them against their murderous dictator. Block heads BRITAIN is being suffocated by a culture of obstructionism which stops anything getting done while simultaneously seeking to regulate our lives and crush pleasure. Thanks to NIMBYs, we can’t build enough homes or power plants, nor approve a single reservoir, nor extract shale gas crucial to our energy security. The Lib Dems are shamefully proud to champion all campaigners against progress. Similarly, in Whitehall, their left-liberal civil service soulmates enjoy thwarting any radical ideas for change. Meanwhile the same group obsessively plot to dictate what ordinary people can eat and drink — and even whether to allow us a harmless flutter. A new “study”, funded by your money, urges a ban on gambling ads and sponsorship — plus intrusive checks on punters’ bank accounts. Why? Because a truly tiny proportion of the population, 0.2 per cent and falling, is addicted. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun The new PM must defund nanny-state meddlers and confront NIMBYs head-on. They are all paralysing British life. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, there are several paragraphs in which public institutions such as the British Government and the UK society are accused of being incompetent or adopting the wrong decisions, such as the war in Ukraine or the management of the economic crisis.

EN_UA_103011.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

none

The text presents some paragraphs criticising the government of the UK for some energy policies as well as attack some political factions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Energy giant Centrica is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks Hope on bills AT last one energy giant is prepared to do the right thing, small beer though it looks. Centrica’s grants of £250 to £750 for customers least able to pay their monstrous new gas bills are welcome. But they still won’t make much of a dent. No surprise there when the firm is donating only ten per cent of the profits from its British Gas arm. That’s a negligible fraction of Centrica’s soaring total: £1.34billion in just six months this year. It can do so much more. Read More on Energy Bills But at least it is doing something. More than can be said of Shell and BP, making scandalously vast war profits since Putin strangled the oil supply. Those who still oppose the windfall tax in these truly exceptional circumstances should think again. Most read in Opinion Bar Russians WHY should Russians be free to holiday in Britain, or Italy, or the South of France? We and the EU should ban new visas now. No, it’s not fair on those opposed to Putin. But many of them fled Russia months or years ago. Depressing surveys show huge support among the remaining population for Putin’s genocide. It is delusional to imagine those are all inaccurate. Ordinary Russians seem mostly behind wiping Ukraine and its people off the map. Our Defence Secretary Ben Wallace wants only to tighten visa rules to bar the families of oligarchs and Kremlin goons. But we should go further, as Ukraine’s President Zelensky says. Russians who can prove they have publicly opposed Putin can request asylum. The rest must know they are not welcome to travel to Europe while their country is still butchering its neighbour. We must do everything we can to turn them against their murderous dictator. Block heads BRITAIN is being suffocated by a culture of obstructionism which stops anything getting done while simultaneously seeking to regulate our lives and crush pleasure. Thanks to NIMBYs, we can’t build enough homes or power plants, nor approve a single reservoir, nor extract shale gas crucial to our energy security. The Lib Dems are shamefully proud to champion all campaigners against progress. Similarly, in Whitehall, their left-liberal civil service soulmates enjoy thwarting any radical ideas for change. Meanwhile the same group obsessively plot to dictate what ordinary people can eat and drink — and even whether to allow us a harmless flutter. A new “study”, funded by your money, urges a ban on gambling ads and sponsorship — plus intrusive checks on punters’ bank accounts. Why? Because a truly tiny proportion of the population, 0.2 per cent and falling, is addicted. READ MORE SUN STORIES Read More on The Sun The new PM must defund nanny-state meddlers and confront NIMBYs head-on. They are all paralysing British life. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs criticise UK institutions such as the government and political parties as well as economic companies such as Cenrica and Shell for not doing enough in the face of the war in Ukraine. The author accuses them of not having a clear plan of action as well as of being inefficient and corrupt

EN_UA_103011.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

none

The text presents some paragraphs criticising the government of the UK for some energy policies as well as attack some political factions

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Majority of Americans Believe ‘Climate Change’ Hoax but Oppose Ending Fossil Fuels Unfortunately, a new poll shows that the majority of Americans believe to some extent the unscientific climate doom propaganda that has been consistently wrong for half a century. The good news: most Americans still oppose ditching fossil fuels and gas cars altogether. Pew Research Center published the results of its new survey on June 28. While climate alarmists’ predictions have been consistently and wildly wrong for 50 years now, with one unscientific claim after another proven false, the media, government, and institutions continue pounding in the narrative — and with some apparently considerable effects: - 74% of Americans say they support the country’s participation in international efforts to reduce the effects of climate change. - 67% of U.S. adults prioritize the development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar and hydrogen power over increasing the production of fossil fuel energy sources. I have previously explained in more detail how “green” energy is actually toxic for the environment, besides being inefficient and unprofitable. In other words, “green” energy is a lose-lose option. Solar panels and wind turbines have killed billions of birds, for instance, and offshore wind turbines can be deadly for whales (not to mention, wind turbines and solar panels generate plenty of toxic waste). And those “green” electric vehicles (EV)? EV batteries, which have to be replaced every few years, are very toxic to manufacture and dispose of. Perhaps Americans are starting to realize that: [Pew:] Less than half of the public (40%) favors phasing out the production of gas-powered cars and trucks. Support for this policy is 7 percentage points lower than it was two years ago. And underscoring the strong feelings big changes to American life can engender, 45% say they would feel upset if gas-powered cars were phased out; fewer than half as many (21%) would feel excited. You mean Americans don’t want to switch to unreliable electric cars that have to depend upon an already strained grid? No way! If Pew is to be believed, however, Americans are a little too credulous of the narrative that carbon is about to make this planet into a ball of fire. (Spoiler: it isn’t): - 76% favor providing a tax credit to businesses that develop carbon capture technologies and 70% support taxing corporations based on their carbon emissions. - 61% favor requiring power plants to eliminate all carbon emissions by the year 2040 One very simple truth that the climate alarmists don’t want you to know is that carbon is absolutely essential for life on Earth. Indeed, increased carbon actually helps plants — including food crops — thrive. Human, plant, or animal, we need carbon. So drastically reducing carbon could hurt humans and devastate crops and plants. Ireland to require farmers to reduce cattle herds by one-third by 2030 to save planet. Farmers to reduce carbon footprint through bankruptcy.https://t.co/YyZGxlPLNm — Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) February 7, 2023 By the way, a recent study found that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are too low to cause global warming. That seems like important information, but don’t expect to see it in the mainstream media. Related: WATCH: Cricketer Carries Climate Protester Off the Field It is disappointing that so many Americans believe to some degree in the climate hoax after all these years. But it is encouraging that Americans are not falling hook, line, and sinker for some of the lies around electric vehicles and fossil fuels. We don’t need to give up our cars to save the planet. It’s all just a political deception. Join the conversation as a VIP Member </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article discussing how climate movement has been unsuccessful in convincing the American public to make changes that will supposedly help with climate change. Throughout, article pushes back against certain policies, labelling them ineffective, wrong, or even dangerous

EN_CC_100037.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

none

The text conveys a narrative downplaying climate change arguing that there is a lack of scientific evidence and predictions happened to be false. Moreover, the impact of Co2 is questioned or even considered beneficial for the environment

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Majority of Americans Believe ‘Climate Change’ Hoax but Oppose Ending Fossil Fuels Unfortunately, a new poll shows that the majority of Americans believe to some extent the unscientific climate doom propaganda that has been consistently wrong for half a century. The good news: most Americans still oppose ditching fossil fuels and gas cars altogether. Pew Research Center published the results of its new survey on June 28. While climate alarmists’ predictions have been consistently and wildly wrong for 50 years now, with one unscientific claim after another proven false, the media, government, and institutions continue pounding in the narrative — and with some apparently considerable effects: - 74% of Americans say they support the country’s participation in international efforts to reduce the effects of climate change. - 67% of U.S. adults prioritize the development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar and hydrogen power over increasing the production of fossil fuel energy sources. I have previously explained in more detail how “green” energy is actually toxic for the environment, besides being inefficient and unprofitable. In other words, “green” energy is a lose-lose option. Solar panels and wind turbines have killed billions of birds, for instance, and offshore wind turbines can be deadly for whales (not to mention, wind turbines and solar panels generate plenty of toxic waste). And those “green” electric vehicles (EV)? EV batteries, which have to be replaced every few years, are very toxic to manufacture and dispose of. Perhaps Americans are starting to realize that: [Pew:] Less than half of the public (40%) favors phasing out the production of gas-powered cars and trucks. Support for this policy is 7 percentage points lower than it was two years ago. And underscoring the strong feelings big changes to American life can engender, 45% say they would feel upset if gas-powered cars were phased out; fewer than half as many (21%) would feel excited. You mean Americans don’t want to switch to unreliable electric cars that have to depend upon an already strained grid? No way! If Pew is to be believed, however, Americans are a little too credulous of the narrative that carbon is about to make this planet into a ball of fire. (Spoiler: it isn’t): - 76% favor providing a tax credit to businesses that develop carbon capture technologies and 70% support taxing corporations based on their carbon emissions. - 61% favor requiring power plants to eliminate all carbon emissions by the year 2040 One very simple truth that the climate alarmists don’t want you to know is that carbon is absolutely essential for life on Earth. Indeed, increased carbon actually helps plants — including food crops — thrive. Human, plant, or animal, we need carbon. So drastically reducing carbon could hurt humans and devastate crops and plants. Ireland to require farmers to reduce cattle herds by one-third by 2030 to save planet. Farmers to reduce carbon footprint through bankruptcy.https://t.co/YyZGxlPLNm — Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) February 7, 2023 By the way, a recent study found that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are too low to cause global warming. That seems like important information, but don’t expect to see it in the mainstream media. Related: WATCH: Cricketer Carries Climate Protester Off the Field It is disappointing that so many Americans believe to some degree in the climate hoax after all these years. But it is encouraging that Americans are not falling hook, line, and sinker for some of the lies around electric vehicles and fossil fuels. We don’t need to give up our cars to save the planet. It’s all just a political deception. Join the conversation as a VIP Member </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise climate change activism accusing them of alarmism. More specifically, it attacks the narrative that carbon is going to make Earth uninhabitable

EN_CC_100037.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

none

The text conveys a narrative downplaying climate change arguing that there is a lack of scientific evidence and predictions happened to be false. Moreover, the impact of Co2 is questioned or even considered beneficial for the environment

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Majority of Americans Believe ‘Climate Change’ Hoax but Oppose Ending Fossil Fuels Unfortunately, a new poll shows that the majority of Americans believe to some extent the unscientific climate doom propaganda that has been consistently wrong for half a century. The good news: most Americans still oppose ditching fossil fuels and gas cars altogether. Pew Research Center published the results of its new survey on June 28. While climate alarmists’ predictions have been consistently and wildly wrong for 50 years now, with one unscientific claim after another proven false, the media, government, and institutions continue pounding in the narrative — and with some apparently considerable effects: - 74% of Americans say they support the country’s participation in international efforts to reduce the effects of climate change. - 67% of U.S. adults prioritize the development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar and hydrogen power over increasing the production of fossil fuel energy sources. I have previously explained in more detail how “green” energy is actually toxic for the environment, besides being inefficient and unprofitable. In other words, “green” energy is a lose-lose option. Solar panels and wind turbines have killed billions of birds, for instance, and offshore wind turbines can be deadly for whales (not to mention, wind turbines and solar panels generate plenty of toxic waste). And those “green” electric vehicles (EV)? EV batteries, which have to be replaced every few years, are very toxic to manufacture and dispose of. Perhaps Americans are starting to realize that: [Pew:] Less than half of the public (40%) favors phasing out the production of gas-powered cars and trucks. Support for this policy is 7 percentage points lower than it was two years ago. And underscoring the strong feelings big changes to American life can engender, 45% say they would feel upset if gas-powered cars were phased out; fewer than half as many (21%) would feel excited. You mean Americans don’t want to switch to unreliable electric cars that have to depend upon an already strained grid? No way! If Pew is to be believed, however, Americans are a little too credulous of the narrative that carbon is about to make this planet into a ball of fire. (Spoiler: it isn’t): - 76% favor providing a tax credit to businesses that develop carbon capture technologies and 70% support taxing corporations based on their carbon emissions. - 61% favor requiring power plants to eliminate all carbon emissions by the year 2040 One very simple truth that the climate alarmists don’t want you to know is that carbon is absolutely essential for life on Earth. Indeed, increased carbon actually helps plants — including food crops — thrive. Human, plant, or animal, we need carbon. So drastically reducing carbon could hurt humans and devastate crops and plants. Ireland to require farmers to reduce cattle herds by one-third by 2030 to save planet. Farmers to reduce carbon footprint through bankruptcy.https://t.co/YyZGxlPLNm — Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) February 7, 2023 By the way, a recent study found that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are too low to cause global warming. That seems like important information, but don’t expect to see it in the mainstream media. Related: WATCH: Cricketer Carries Climate Protester Off the Field It is disappointing that so many Americans believe to some degree in the climate hoax after all these years. But it is encouraging that Americans are not falling hook, line, and sinker for some of the lies around electric vehicles and fossil fuels. We don’t need to give up our cars to save the planet. It’s all just a political deception. Join the conversation as a VIP Member </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article aims at discrediting the climate movement, accusing them of not following the scientific evidences as well as alarmism, while proposing alternative energy solutions which would be more suitable in the context of US society.

EN_CC_100037.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

none

The text conveys a narrative downplaying climate change arguing that there is a lack of scientific evidence and predictions happened to be false. Moreover, the impact of Co2 is questioned or even considered beneficial for the environment

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Majority of Americans Believe ‘Climate Change’ Hoax but Oppose Ending Fossil Fuels Unfortunately, a new poll shows that the majority of Americans believe to some extent the unscientific climate doom propaganda that has been consistently wrong for half a century. The good news: most Americans still oppose ditching fossil fuels and gas cars altogether. Pew Research Center published the results of its new survey on June 28. While climate alarmists’ predictions have been consistently and wildly wrong for 50 years now, with one unscientific claim after another proven false, the media, government, and institutions continue pounding in the narrative — and with some apparently considerable effects: - 74% of Americans say they support the country’s participation in international efforts to reduce the effects of climate change. - 67% of U.S. adults prioritize the development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar and hydrogen power over increasing the production of fossil fuel energy sources. I have previously explained in more detail how “green” energy is actually toxic for the environment, besides being inefficient and unprofitable. In other words, “green” energy is a lose-lose option. Solar panels and wind turbines have killed billions of birds, for instance, and offshore wind turbines can be deadly for whales (not to mention, wind turbines and solar panels generate plenty of toxic waste). And those “green” electric vehicles (EV)? EV batteries, which have to be replaced every few years, are very toxic to manufacture and dispose of. Perhaps Americans are starting to realize that: [Pew:] Less than half of the public (40%) favors phasing out the production of gas-powered cars and trucks. Support for this policy is 7 percentage points lower than it was two years ago. And underscoring the strong feelings big changes to American life can engender, 45% say they would feel upset if gas-powered cars were phased out; fewer than half as many (21%) would feel excited. You mean Americans don’t want to switch to unreliable electric cars that have to depend upon an already strained grid? No way! If Pew is to be believed, however, Americans are a little too credulous of the narrative that carbon is about to make this planet into a ball of fire. (Spoiler: it isn’t): - 76% favor providing a tax credit to businesses that develop carbon capture technologies and 70% support taxing corporations based on their carbon emissions. - 61% favor requiring power plants to eliminate all carbon emissions by the year 2040 One very simple truth that the climate alarmists don’t want you to know is that carbon is absolutely essential for life on Earth. Indeed, increased carbon actually helps plants — including food crops — thrive. Human, plant, or animal, we need carbon. So drastically reducing carbon could hurt humans and devastate crops and plants. Ireland to require farmers to reduce cattle herds by one-third by 2030 to save planet. Farmers to reduce carbon footprint through bankruptcy.https://t.co/YyZGxlPLNm — Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) February 7, 2023 By the way, a recent study found that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are too low to cause global warming. That seems like important information, but don’t expect to see it in the mainstream media. Related: WATCH: Cricketer Carries Climate Protester Off the Field It is disappointing that so many Americans believe to some degree in the climate hoax after all these years. But it is encouraging that Americans are not falling hook, line, and sinker for some of the lies around electric vehicles and fossil fuels. We don’t need to give up our cars to save the planet. It’s all just a political deception. Join the conversation as a VIP Member </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has several paragraphs that present alleged evidence that climate change is a hoax as well as criticising climate policies

EN_CC_100037.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

none

The text conveys a narrative downplaying climate change arguing that there is a lack of scientific evidence and predictions happened to be false. Moreover, the impact of Co2 is questioned or even considered beneficial for the environment

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Majority of Americans Believe ‘Climate Change’ Hoax but Oppose Ending Fossil Fuels Unfortunately, a new poll shows that the majority of Americans believe to some extent the unscientific climate doom propaganda that has been consistently wrong for half a century. The good news: most Americans still oppose ditching fossil fuels and gas cars altogether. Pew Research Center published the results of its new survey on June 28. While climate alarmists’ predictions have been consistently and wildly wrong for 50 years now, with one unscientific claim after another proven false, the media, government, and institutions continue pounding in the narrative — and with some apparently considerable effects: - 74% of Americans say they support the country’s participation in international efforts to reduce the effects of climate change. - 67% of U.S. adults prioritize the development of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar and hydrogen power over increasing the production of fossil fuel energy sources. I have previously explained in more detail how “green” energy is actually toxic for the environment, besides being inefficient and unprofitable. In other words, “green” energy is a lose-lose option. Solar panels and wind turbines have killed billions of birds, for instance, and offshore wind turbines can be deadly for whales (not to mention, wind turbines and solar panels generate plenty of toxic waste). And those “green” electric vehicles (EV)? EV batteries, which have to be replaced every few years, are very toxic to manufacture and dispose of. Perhaps Americans are starting to realize that: [Pew:] Less than half of the public (40%) favors phasing out the production of gas-powered cars and trucks. Support for this policy is 7 percentage points lower than it was two years ago. And underscoring the strong feelings big changes to American life can engender, 45% say they would feel upset if gas-powered cars were phased out; fewer than half as many (21%) would feel excited. You mean Americans don’t want to switch to unreliable electric cars that have to depend upon an already strained grid? No way! If Pew is to be believed, however, Americans are a little too credulous of the narrative that carbon is about to make this planet into a ball of fire. (Spoiler: it isn’t): - 76% favor providing a tax credit to businesses that develop carbon capture technologies and 70% support taxing corporations based on their carbon emissions. - 61% favor requiring power plants to eliminate all carbon emissions by the year 2040 One very simple truth that the climate alarmists don’t want you to know is that carbon is absolutely essential for life on Earth. Indeed, increased carbon actually helps plants — including food crops — thrive. Human, plant, or animal, we need carbon. So drastically reducing carbon could hurt humans and devastate crops and plants. Ireland to require farmers to reduce cattle herds by one-third by 2030 to save planet. Farmers to reduce carbon footprint through bankruptcy.https://t.co/YyZGxlPLNm — Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) February 7, 2023 By the way, a recent study found that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are too low to cause global warming. That seems like important information, but don’t expect to see it in the mainstream media. Related: WATCH: Cricketer Carries Climate Protester Off the Field It is disappointing that so many Americans believe to some degree in the climate hoax after all these years. But it is encouraging that Americans are not falling hook, line, and sinker for some of the lies around electric vehicles and fossil fuels. We don’t need to give up our cars to save the planet. It’s all just a political deception. Join the conversation as a VIP Member </document> <category> CC: Downplaying climate change </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise climate policies adopted by the US government arguing that they are based on faulty scientific studies. In doing so, the author discredits climate movement claiming it is alarmist and exaggerated

EN_CC_100037.txt

CC: Downplaying climate change

none

The text conveys a narrative downplaying climate change arguing that there is a lack of scientific evidence and predictions happened to be false. Moreover, the impact of Co2 is questioned or even considered beneficial for the environment

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Nuclear War Back on the Table; I’m Loading Up on SILVER!! We proudly RE-POST this publication, originally released on WealthResearchGroup.com. In 2023, Wealth Research Group’s founder made his portfolio visible and the results were world-class! Over 15 companies reached new highs and he just made his 2024 portfolio available for us. ACCESS IT HERE! American Interventionism Is Dangerous, But Is It Worse than the Alternative? I’ve been here before, only I didn’t know it. When I born in the summer of 1984, the world had already escaped nuclear holocaust on a number of occasions, but the biggest close calls happened in the early 1980s, with one of them so close to a Soviet-American thermonuclear war that the Soviet officer who de-escalated the event is dubbed “the man that saved the world” – Stanislav Petrov. Like all incredible lucky stories, Stanislav was called to duty at the last second, because the officer originally assigned to the shift was sick. Suddenly, his screen was filled with notices of nuclear warheads headed to the Soviet Union from the United States, and he had to decide whether or not to call Moscow ASAP and alert them that in five minutes, the entire country would be obliterated! But something stopped him… he began reasoning that had the United States started on the path of nuclear war, they’d launch hundreds of missiles, not just a few, and decided to hold off and learn that no other station was reporting anything. Subsequently, he learned that this was a new satellite detection system that was totally useless, and that even flares from the clouds and sun could make it beep. Basically, he found out that the latest Soviet air defenses were garbage and was actually fired, instead of hailed for his deep thinking. I was born the year after Stanislav Petrov saved the world, including my own parents. Now, the Russians and NATO members are fighting a proxy war in Ukraine. France is ready to send troops to Ukraine already and, instead of having the country join NATO, it will essentially turn Ukraine into a buffer zone between Russia and the rest of Europe, but president Biden, of all people, is the one blocking it. No wonder precious metals are soaring, but do I agree with hedge fund managers that it is overvalued? Courtesy: Zerohedge.com In my opinion, gold is not overvalued, and its fair price is in the neighborhood of $2,582, whereas silver’s is around $37. In the next few weeks, Biden will realize that France entering Ukraine, while showing that Washington is playing second fiddle to an emerging superpower in Europe. Washington stands to gain much from this, as it will drastically shift from policing the world to coalizing with other nations and keeping its influence, while isolating more and more, which is a very bi-partisan strategy. If this happens, a head-on confrontation between France and Russia will send the human race back to the WW2 era, and I submit to you that French troops will then be reinforced by German, Polish and Italian ones. Ukraine, in effect, will be like the Berlin Wall, separating Russia from Europe proper. If you’re shaking your head in disbelief, just know that during Carter’s term in office, a 40c-worth chip malfunctioned once, prompting the screens to show that 2,000 Soviet warheads were en route to major American cities. Only five minutes later, when Carter was about to be notified and we were minutes away from launching a counterstrike, the operations room called to say it was a faulty chip!!! Yeah, own silver… it’s going higher. Comments </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple passages criticise the West and the US in relation to the military escalation, mentioning the proxy war in Ukraine. In doing so, the West is accused of being responsible for dangerous military developments with potential use of nuclear weapons. The text also claims that the US is actually isolating itself, while at the same time wanting to have a global hegemony.

EN_UA_025764.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

none

The text criticise Western countries in several passages. It blames the US and France for enacting dangerous military and geostrategic strategies, while also depicting Ukraine as the exploited victim serving the West's interests

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Nuclear War Back on the Table; I’m Loading Up on SILVER!! We proudly RE-POST this publication, originally released on WealthResearchGroup.com. In 2023, Wealth Research Group’s founder made his portfolio visible and the results were world-class! Over 15 companies reached new highs and he just made his 2024 portfolio available for us. ACCESS IT HERE! American Interventionism Is Dangerous, But Is It Worse than the Alternative? I’ve been here before, only I didn’t know it. When I born in the summer of 1984, the world had already escaped nuclear holocaust on a number of occasions, but the biggest close calls happened in the early 1980s, with one of them so close to a Soviet-American thermonuclear war that the Soviet officer who de-escalated the event is dubbed “the man that saved the world” – Stanislav Petrov. Like all incredible lucky stories, Stanislav was called to duty at the last second, because the officer originally assigned to the shift was sick. Suddenly, his screen was filled with notices of nuclear warheads headed to the Soviet Union from the United States, and he had to decide whether or not to call Moscow ASAP and alert them that in five minutes, the entire country would be obliterated! But something stopped him… he began reasoning that had the United States started on the path of nuclear war, they’d launch hundreds of missiles, not just a few, and decided to hold off and learn that no other station was reporting anything. Subsequently, he learned that this was a new satellite detection system that was totally useless, and that even flares from the clouds and sun could make it beep. Basically, he found out that the latest Soviet air defenses were garbage and was actually fired, instead of hailed for his deep thinking. I was born the year after Stanislav Petrov saved the world, including my own parents. Now, the Russians and NATO members are fighting a proxy war in Ukraine. France is ready to send troops to Ukraine already and, instead of having the country join NATO, it will essentially turn Ukraine into a buffer zone between Russia and the rest of Europe, but president Biden, of all people, is the one blocking it. No wonder precious metals are soaring, but do I agree with hedge fund managers that it is overvalued? Courtesy: Zerohedge.com In my opinion, gold is not overvalued, and its fair price is in the neighborhood of $2,582, whereas silver’s is around $37. In the next few weeks, Biden will realize that France entering Ukraine, while showing that Washington is playing second fiddle to an emerging superpower in Europe. Washington stands to gain much from this, as it will drastically shift from policing the world to coalizing with other nations and keeping its influence, while isolating more and more, which is a very bi-partisan strategy. If this happens, a head-on confrontation between France and Russia will send the human race back to the WW2 era, and I submit to you that French troops will then be reinforced by German, Polish and Italian ones. Ukraine, in effect, will be like the Berlin Wall, separating Russia from Europe proper. If you’re shaking your head in disbelief, just know that during Carter’s term in office, a 40c-worth chip malfunctioned once, prompting the screens to show that 2,000 Soviet warheads were en route to major American cities. Only five minutes later, when Carter was about to be notified and we were minutes away from launching a counterstrike, the operations room called to say it was a faulty chip!!! Yeah, own silver… it’s going higher. Comments </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents a narrative in which the Western countries are posing a threat to the world. The West is described as incompetent, deploying instruments that are worse than useless

EN_UA_025764.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

none

The text criticise Western countries in several passages. It blames the US and France for enacting dangerous military and geostrategic strategies, while also depicting Ukraine as the exploited victim serving the West's interests

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Nuclear War Back on the Table; I’m Loading Up on SILVER!! We proudly RE-POST this publication, originally released on WealthResearchGroup.com. In 2023, Wealth Research Group’s founder made his portfolio visible and the results were world-class! Over 15 companies reached new highs and he just made his 2024 portfolio available for us. ACCESS IT HERE! American Interventionism Is Dangerous, But Is It Worse than the Alternative? I’ve been here before, only I didn’t know it. When I born in the summer of 1984, the world had already escaped nuclear holocaust on a number of occasions, but the biggest close calls happened in the early 1980s, with one of them so close to a Soviet-American thermonuclear war that the Soviet officer who de-escalated the event is dubbed “the man that saved the world” – Stanislav Petrov. Like all incredible lucky stories, Stanislav was called to duty at the last second, because the officer originally assigned to the shift was sick. Suddenly, his screen was filled with notices of nuclear warheads headed to the Soviet Union from the United States, and he had to decide whether or not to call Moscow ASAP and alert them that in five minutes, the entire country would be obliterated! But something stopped him… he began reasoning that had the United States started on the path of nuclear war, they’d launch hundreds of missiles, not just a few, and decided to hold off and learn that no other station was reporting anything. Subsequently, he learned that this was a new satellite detection system that was totally useless, and that even flares from the clouds and sun could make it beep. Basically, he found out that the latest Soviet air defenses were garbage and was actually fired, instead of hailed for his deep thinking. I was born the year after Stanislav Petrov saved the world, including my own parents. Now, the Russians and NATO members are fighting a proxy war in Ukraine. France is ready to send troops to Ukraine already and, instead of having the country join NATO, it will essentially turn Ukraine into a buffer zone between Russia and the rest of Europe, but president Biden, of all people, is the one blocking it. No wonder precious metals are soaring, but do I agree with hedge fund managers that it is overvalued? Courtesy: Zerohedge.com In my opinion, gold is not overvalued, and its fair price is in the neighborhood of $2,582, whereas silver’s is around $37. In the next few weeks, Biden will realize that France entering Ukraine, while showing that Washington is playing second fiddle to an emerging superpower in Europe. Washington stands to gain much from this, as it will drastically shift from policing the world to coalizing with other nations and keeping its influence, while isolating more and more, which is a very bi-partisan strategy. If this happens, a head-on confrontation between France and Russia will send the human race back to the WW2 era, and I submit to you that French troops will then be reinforced by German, Polish and Italian ones. Ukraine, in effect, will be like the Berlin Wall, separating Russia from Europe proper. If you’re shaking your head in disbelief, just know that during Carter’s term in office, a 40c-worth chip malfunctioned once, prompting the screens to show that 2,000 Soviet warheads were en route to major American cities. Only five minutes later, when Carter was about to be notified and we were minutes away from launching a counterstrike, the operations room called to say it was a faulty chip!!! Yeah, own silver… it’s going higher. Comments </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article discredits US government and diplomacy, saying it is responsible for endangering the world with dangerous interventions

EN_UA_025764.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

none

The text criticise Western countries in several passages. It blames the US and France for enacting dangerous military and geostrategic strategies, while also depicting Ukraine as the exploited victim serving the West's interests

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Nuclear War Back on the Table; I’m Loading Up on SILVER!! We proudly RE-POST this publication, originally released on WealthResearchGroup.com. In 2023, Wealth Research Group’s founder made his portfolio visible and the results were world-class! Over 15 companies reached new highs and he just made his 2024 portfolio available for us. ACCESS IT HERE! American Interventionism Is Dangerous, But Is It Worse than the Alternative? I’ve been here before, only I didn’t know it. When I born in the summer of 1984, the world had already escaped nuclear holocaust on a number of occasions, but the biggest close calls happened in the early 1980s, with one of them so close to a Soviet-American thermonuclear war that the Soviet officer who de-escalated the event is dubbed “the man that saved the world” – Stanislav Petrov. Like all incredible lucky stories, Stanislav was called to duty at the last second, because the officer originally assigned to the shift was sick. Suddenly, his screen was filled with notices of nuclear warheads headed to the Soviet Union from the United States, and he had to decide whether or not to call Moscow ASAP and alert them that in five minutes, the entire country would be obliterated! But something stopped him… he began reasoning that had the United States started on the path of nuclear war, they’d launch hundreds of missiles, not just a few, and decided to hold off and learn that no other station was reporting anything. Subsequently, he learned that this was a new satellite detection system that was totally useless, and that even flares from the clouds and sun could make it beep. Basically, he found out that the latest Soviet air defenses were garbage and was actually fired, instead of hailed for his deep thinking. I was born the year after Stanislav Petrov saved the world, including my own parents. Now, the Russians and NATO members are fighting a proxy war in Ukraine. France is ready to send troops to Ukraine already and, instead of having the country join NATO, it will essentially turn Ukraine into a buffer zone between Russia and the rest of Europe, but president Biden, of all people, is the one blocking it. No wonder precious metals are soaring, but do I agree with hedge fund managers that it is overvalued? Courtesy: Zerohedge.com In my opinion, gold is not overvalued, and its fair price is in the neighborhood of $2,582, whereas silver’s is around $37. In the next few weeks, Biden will realize that France entering Ukraine, while showing that Washington is playing second fiddle to an emerging superpower in Europe. Washington stands to gain much from this, as it will drastically shift from policing the world to coalizing with other nations and keeping its influence, while isolating more and more, which is a very bi-partisan strategy. If this happens, a head-on confrontation between France and Russia will send the human race back to the WW2 era, and I submit to you that French troops will then be reinforced by German, Polish and Italian ones. Ukraine, in effect, will be like the Berlin Wall, separating Russia from Europe proper. If you’re shaking your head in disbelief, just know that during Carter’s term in office, a 40c-worth chip malfunctioned once, prompting the screens to show that 2,000 Soviet warheads were en route to major American cities. Only five minutes later, when Carter was about to be notified and we were minutes away from launching a counterstrike, the operations room called to say it was a faulty chip!!! Yeah, own silver… it’s going higher. Comments </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the text, Western allies of Ukraine are blamed for escalation, providing faulty weapons to Ukraine, being disunited and confused and trying to isolate Russia

EN_UA_025764.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

none

The text criticise Western countries in several passages. It blames the US and France for enacting dangerous military and geostrategic strategies, while also depicting Ukraine as the exploited victim serving the West's interests

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Nuclear War Back on the Table; I’m Loading Up on SILVER!! We proudly RE-POST this publication, originally released on WealthResearchGroup.com. In 2023, Wealth Research Group’s founder made his portfolio visible and the results were world-class! Over 15 companies reached new highs and he just made his 2024 portfolio available for us. ACCESS IT HERE! American Interventionism Is Dangerous, But Is It Worse than the Alternative? I’ve been here before, only I didn’t know it. When I born in the summer of 1984, the world had already escaped nuclear holocaust on a number of occasions, but the biggest close calls happened in the early 1980s, with one of them so close to a Soviet-American thermonuclear war that the Soviet officer who de-escalated the event is dubbed “the man that saved the world” – Stanislav Petrov. Like all incredible lucky stories, Stanislav was called to duty at the last second, because the officer originally assigned to the shift was sick. Suddenly, his screen was filled with notices of nuclear warheads headed to the Soviet Union from the United States, and he had to decide whether or not to call Moscow ASAP and alert them that in five minutes, the entire country would be obliterated! But something stopped him… he began reasoning that had the United States started on the path of nuclear war, they’d launch hundreds of missiles, not just a few, and decided to hold off and learn that no other station was reporting anything. Subsequently, he learned that this was a new satellite detection system that was totally useless, and that even flares from the clouds and sun could make it beep. Basically, he found out that the latest Soviet air defenses were garbage and was actually fired, instead of hailed for his deep thinking. I was born the year after Stanislav Petrov saved the world, including my own parents. Now, the Russians and NATO members are fighting a proxy war in Ukraine. France is ready to send troops to Ukraine already and, instead of having the country join NATO, it will essentially turn Ukraine into a buffer zone between Russia and the rest of Europe, but president Biden, of all people, is the one blocking it. No wonder precious metals are soaring, but do I agree with hedge fund managers that it is overvalued? Courtesy: Zerohedge.com In my opinion, gold is not overvalued, and its fair price is in the neighborhood of $2,582, whereas silver’s is around $37. In the next few weeks, Biden will realize that France entering Ukraine, while showing that Washington is playing second fiddle to an emerging superpower in Europe. Washington stands to gain much from this, as it will drastically shift from policing the world to coalizing with other nations and keeping its influence, while isolating more and more, which is a very bi-partisan strategy. If this happens, a head-on confrontation between France and Russia will send the human race back to the WW2 era, and I submit to you that French troops will then be reinforced by German, Polish and Italian ones. Ukraine, in effect, will be like the Berlin Wall, separating Russia from Europe proper. If you’re shaking your head in disbelief, just know that during Carter’s term in office, a 40c-worth chip malfunctioned once, prompting the screens to show that 2,000 Soviet warheads were en route to major American cities. Only five minutes later, when Carter was about to be notified and we were minutes away from launching a counterstrike, the operations room called to say it was a faulty chip!!! Yeah, own silver… it’s going higher. Comments </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout all the text, the West and the US are discreredited since they are considered the main source of problems and potential military escalation of the conflict in Ukraine

EN_UA_025764.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

none

The text criticise Western countries in several passages. It blames the US and France for enacting dangerous military and geostrategic strategies, while also depicting Ukraine as the exploited victim serving the West's interests

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia wants UN probe into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions Moscow: Russia will ask the UN Security Council for an investigation into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions in September last year for which it blames the US. The Russian parliament’s committee for international relations has introduced the motion regarding this and is expected to get approval by the State Duma later this week. What does the proposal say? According to a report by TASS, the proposal calls the Baltic Sea pipelines blasts as “an act of international terrorism” and a “monstrous sabotage." It seeks from the United Nations to hold accountable both - who gave the order for the explosions and those who carried it out. “The criminal act has threatened the security of all Eurasia,” the proposal stated. Giving the reference to the report of American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, the lawmakers blamed US President Joe Biden’s administration, saying it “gave the illegal order and bears full responsibility for the multi-billion-dollar damage to the infrastructure of Russia, Germany, France and the Netherlands." Don’t Miss: US planted explosives along Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022 under Biden supervision, claims Seymour Hersh They further described the pipeline sabotage as inflicting long-term damage to the security, economy and environment of the entire region. Hersh in his report alleged that the Nord Stream gas pipelines were damaged in a joint operation between the US and Norway. Also Read: Russian foreign ministry asks for answers from the US over ‘blowing up’ Nord Stream US actions require “a thorough international investigation, punishment of those responsible and compensation for the damage caused,” the proposal said. What Seymour Hersh’s report say? Last week, Hersh in over 5,000 words report claimed that “top secret and highly-dangerous operation” was carried out by the divers during BALTOPS22, a series of military exercises in the Baltic Sea carried out by 16 NATO countries. According to him, divers trained at the US Navy’s Diving and Salvage Centre in Florida, planted C4 explosives on three Nord Stream pipelines in June 2022. They were detonated after three months using a sonar buoy which broadcast a signal that triggered the bombs. Must Read: As plot around Nord Stream sabotage thickens, West’s tussle with Russia over Ukraine war gets a new twist He further claimed that the Nord Stream attack was carried out in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Explosions in Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were reported on 26 September, 2022, an attack that, ostensibly, continues to puzzle investigators. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article talks about Russia wanting to investigate Nord Stream gas pipelines sabotage which it holds US responsible for. According to them, this was an act of international terrorism.

EN_UA_012611.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Article presenting quotes Russian official responses to the Nordstream pipeline explosions, framing the US as perpetrators of the attack and ultimately responsible for infringing on the security of the whole Eurasia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia wants UN probe into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions Moscow: Russia will ask the UN Security Council for an investigation into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions in September last year for which it blames the US. The Russian parliament’s committee for international relations has introduced the motion regarding this and is expected to get approval by the State Duma later this week. What does the proposal say? According to a report by TASS, the proposal calls the Baltic Sea pipelines blasts as “an act of international terrorism” and a “monstrous sabotage." It seeks from the United Nations to hold accountable both - who gave the order for the explosions and those who carried it out. “The criminal act has threatened the security of all Eurasia,” the proposal stated. Giving the reference to the report of American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, the lawmakers blamed US President Joe Biden’s administration, saying it “gave the illegal order and bears full responsibility for the multi-billion-dollar damage to the infrastructure of Russia, Germany, France and the Netherlands." Don’t Miss: US planted explosives along Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022 under Biden supervision, claims Seymour Hersh They further described the pipeline sabotage as inflicting long-term damage to the security, economy and environment of the entire region. Hersh in his report alleged that the Nord Stream gas pipelines were damaged in a joint operation between the US and Norway. Also Read: Russian foreign ministry asks for answers from the US over ‘blowing up’ Nord Stream US actions require “a thorough international investigation, punishment of those responsible and compensation for the damage caused,” the proposal said. What Seymour Hersh’s report say? Last week, Hersh in over 5,000 words report claimed that “top secret and highly-dangerous operation” was carried out by the divers during BALTOPS22, a series of military exercises in the Baltic Sea carried out by 16 NATO countries. According to him, divers trained at the US Navy’s Diving and Salvage Centre in Florida, planted C4 explosives on three Nord Stream pipelines in June 2022. They were detonated after three months using a sonar buoy which broadcast a signal that triggered the bombs. Must Read: As plot around Nord Stream sabotage thickens, West’s tussle with Russia over Ukraine war gets a new twist He further claimed that the Nord Stream attack was carried out in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Explosions in Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were reported on 26 September, 2022, an attack that, ostensibly, continues to puzzle investigators. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article presents some paragraphs underlining the negative consequences for Western countries of the gas pipeline attack. By doing this the article fosters the idea that the pipeline sabotage was actually ordered by the US which would thus be the agressor.

EN_UA_012611.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Article presenting quotes Russian official responses to the Nordstream pipeline explosions, framing the US as perpetrators of the attack and ultimately responsible for infringing on the security of the whole Eurasia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia wants UN probe into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions Moscow: Russia will ask the UN Security Council for an investigation into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions in September last year for which it blames the US. The Russian parliament’s committee for international relations has introduced the motion regarding this and is expected to get approval by the State Duma later this week. What does the proposal say? According to a report by TASS, the proposal calls the Baltic Sea pipelines blasts as “an act of international terrorism” and a “monstrous sabotage." It seeks from the United Nations to hold accountable both - who gave the order for the explosions and those who carried it out. “The criminal act has threatened the security of all Eurasia,” the proposal stated. Giving the reference to the report of American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, the lawmakers blamed US President Joe Biden’s administration, saying it “gave the illegal order and bears full responsibility for the multi-billion-dollar damage to the infrastructure of Russia, Germany, France and the Netherlands." Don’t Miss: US planted explosives along Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022 under Biden supervision, claims Seymour Hersh They further described the pipeline sabotage as inflicting long-term damage to the security, economy and environment of the entire region. Hersh in his report alleged that the Nord Stream gas pipelines were damaged in a joint operation between the US and Norway. Also Read: Russian foreign ministry asks for answers from the US over ‘blowing up’ Nord Stream US actions require “a thorough international investigation, punishment of those responsible and compensation for the damage caused,” the proposal said. What Seymour Hersh’s report say? Last week, Hersh in over 5,000 words report claimed that “top secret and highly-dangerous operation” was carried out by the divers during BALTOPS22, a series of military exercises in the Baltic Sea carried out by 16 NATO countries. According to him, divers trained at the US Navy’s Diving and Salvage Centre in Florida, planted C4 explosives on three Nord Stream pipelines in June 2022. They were detonated after three months using a sonar buoy which broadcast a signal that triggered the bombs. Must Read: As plot around Nord Stream sabotage thickens, West’s tussle with Russia over Ukraine war gets a new twist He further claimed that the Nord Stream attack was carried out in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Explosions in Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were reported on 26 September, 2022, an attack that, ostensibly, continues to puzzle investigators. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs report that the Nordstream gas pipeline sabotage was operated by US Navy divers in the framework of NATO military exercises in the Baltic Sea. These claims are presented without providing evidence and underlining the complexity of the alleged operation

EN_UA_012611.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Article presenting quotes Russian official responses to the Nordstream pipeline explosions, framing the US as perpetrators of the attack and ultimately responsible for infringing on the security of the whole Eurasia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia wants UN probe into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions Moscow: Russia will ask the UN Security Council for an investigation into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions in September last year for which it blames the US. The Russian parliament’s committee for international relations has introduced the motion regarding this and is expected to get approval by the State Duma later this week. What does the proposal say? According to a report by TASS, the proposal calls the Baltic Sea pipelines blasts as “an act of international terrorism” and a “monstrous sabotage." It seeks from the United Nations to hold accountable both - who gave the order for the explosions and those who carried it out. “The criminal act has threatened the security of all Eurasia,” the proposal stated. Giving the reference to the report of American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, the lawmakers blamed US President Joe Biden’s administration, saying it “gave the illegal order and bears full responsibility for the multi-billion-dollar damage to the infrastructure of Russia, Germany, France and the Netherlands." Don’t Miss: US planted explosives along Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022 under Biden supervision, claims Seymour Hersh They further described the pipeline sabotage as inflicting long-term damage to the security, economy and environment of the entire region. Hersh in his report alleged that the Nord Stream gas pipelines were damaged in a joint operation between the US and Norway. Also Read: Russian foreign ministry asks for answers from the US over ‘blowing up’ Nord Stream US actions require “a thorough international investigation, punishment of those responsible and compensation for the damage caused,” the proposal said. What Seymour Hersh’s report say? Last week, Hersh in over 5,000 words report claimed that “top secret and highly-dangerous operation” was carried out by the divers during BALTOPS22, a series of military exercises in the Baltic Sea carried out by 16 NATO countries. According to him, divers trained at the US Navy’s Diving and Salvage Centre in Florida, planted C4 explosives on three Nord Stream pipelines in June 2022. They were detonated after three months using a sonar buoy which broadcast a signal that triggered the bombs. Must Read: As plot around Nord Stream sabotage thickens, West’s tussle with Russia over Ukraine war gets a new twist He further claimed that the Nord Stream attack was carried out in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Explosions in Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were reported on 26 September, 2022, an attack that, ostensibly, continues to puzzle investigators. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a Russian narrative blaming the US for attacks on the Nord Stream.

EN_UA_012611.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Article presenting quotes Russian official responses to the Nordstream pipeline explosions, framing the US as perpetrators of the attack and ultimately responsible for infringing on the security of the whole Eurasia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Russia wants UN probe into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions Moscow: Russia will ask the UN Security Council for an investigation into Nord Stream gas pipelines explosions in September last year for which it blames the US. The Russian parliament’s committee for international relations has introduced the motion regarding this and is expected to get approval by the State Duma later this week. What does the proposal say? According to a report by TASS, the proposal calls the Baltic Sea pipelines blasts as “an act of international terrorism” and a “monstrous sabotage." It seeks from the United Nations to hold accountable both - who gave the order for the explosions and those who carried it out. “The criminal act has threatened the security of all Eurasia,” the proposal stated. Giving the reference to the report of American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, the lawmakers blamed US President Joe Biden’s administration, saying it “gave the illegal order and bears full responsibility for the multi-billion-dollar damage to the infrastructure of Russia, Germany, France and the Netherlands." Don’t Miss: US planted explosives along Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022 under Biden supervision, claims Seymour Hersh They further described the pipeline sabotage as inflicting long-term damage to the security, economy and environment of the entire region. Hersh in his report alleged that the Nord Stream gas pipelines were damaged in a joint operation between the US and Norway. Also Read: Russian foreign ministry asks for answers from the US over ‘blowing up’ Nord Stream US actions require “a thorough international investigation, punishment of those responsible and compensation for the damage caused,” the proposal said. What Seymour Hersh’s report say? Last week, Hersh in over 5,000 words report claimed that “top secret and highly-dangerous operation” was carried out by the divers during BALTOPS22, a series of military exercises in the Baltic Sea carried out by 16 NATO countries. According to him, divers trained at the US Navy’s Diving and Salvage Centre in Florida, planted C4 explosives on three Nord Stream pipelines in June 2022. They were detonated after three months using a sonar buoy which broadcast a signal that triggered the bombs. Must Read: As plot around Nord Stream sabotage thickens, West’s tussle with Russia over Ukraine war gets a new twist He further claimed that the Nord Stream attack was carried out in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Explosions in Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were reported on 26 September, 2022, an attack that, ostensibly, continues to puzzle investigators. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram . </document> <category> URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text presents several paragraphs blaming the Nord Stream gas pipelines explosion on Western countries, fostering the idea that it was a joint operation with the US and Norway. It aims at justifying the military invasion of Ukraine, saying it is a retaliation to Western interference in Russian security.

EN_UA_012611.txt

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader

URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors

Article presenting quotes Russian official responses to the Nordstream pipeline explosions, framing the US as perpetrators of the attack and ultimately responsible for infringing on the security of the whole Eurasia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> At Last, a Credible Explanation of How Kakhovka Dam Was Blown Up by Eric Zuesse, The Duran: Though Western ‘news’ media have gotten their ‘explanation’ of this event from Ukraine’s Government, it never made sense that Russia would have wanted to flood, harm, and weaken, the entire western half of the territory that Russia now controls in the former Ukraine, including in Crimea (which was getting its water-supply from that dam). The anonymous author of the “Moon of Alabama” website has a long and almost flawless record of accurately exposing realities that mainstream U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media had been hiding, and the latest such is his June 13th “Did Russia Destroy The Nova Kakhovka Dam?” His report there turns upside-down and inside-out the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ that the dam had been bombed not by a missile, but by an explosive device which had been placed there by saboteurs whom Ukraine’s Government assumes were from Russia. U.S.-Government-approved ‘news’-media accept and amplify that assumption, but “MoA” does not. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ First, he quotes the New York Times and other U.S. Government mouthpieces presenting the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ of the blow-up; and then he rips it apart by noting the extremely relevant (but in U.S.-and-occupied lands ignored) fact, that on May 12th, Britain had supplied to Ukraine its “Storm Shadow” missiles that are designed to have a two-stage bombing-operation: first, a normal surface bomb, but then after it a fuse-ignited ground-penetrating bomb to explode deeper inside even a fortified and hardened underground target such as that dam was apparently blown up. The British-supplied Storm Shadow weapon is perfect for this type of destruction — exploding from deep underground, instead of from the surface. And whereas Russia doesn’t have any Storm Shadows, Ukraine definitely does — ever since May 12th. The present news-report about U.S.-and-allied lies is being simultaneously submitted for publication by all of the standard U.S.-Government mouthpiece propaganda-media, just in case any of them might finally want to go beyond their standard U.S.-Government-approved sources. Ever since at least late 2022, Russia has been warning that Ukraine’s government wants to blow up that dam. For example, on 1 November 2022, Reuters headlined “Russia announces wider evacuation of occupied southern Ukraine”, and reported that, “Due to the possibility of the use of prohibited methods of war by the Ukrainian regime, as well as information that Kyiv is preparing a massive missile strike on the Kakhovka hydroelectric station, there is an immediate danger of the Kherson region being flooded,” Vladimir Saldo, Russian-installed head of occupied Kherson province, said in a video message. “Given the situation, I have decided to expand the evacuation zone by 15 km from the Dnipro,” he said. “The decision will make it possible to create a layered defence in order to repel Ukrainian attacks and protect civilians.” Moscow has accused Kyiv of planning to use a so-called “dirty bomb” to spread radiation, or to blow up a dam to flood towns and villages in Kherson province. Kyiv says accusations it would use such tactics on its own territory are absurd, but that Russia might be planning such actions itself to blame Ukraine. … Saldo, the Russian-imposed occupation leader for the province, identified seven towns on the east bank that would now be evacuated, comprising the main populated settlements along that stretch of the river. Even U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media occasionally report relevant facts when they find them useful to mention in a ‘news’-report that has an anti-Russian “spin.” So: we know that Russia’s Government was trying to protect the residents in that region against this attack, but U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media have unquestioningly accepted the Ukrainian government’s accusation that Russia’s Government did it. And, now, an extremely likely explanation has finally been provided, which implicates both Ukraine’s government and UK’s Government as having done it. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article argues that Western media is an instrument of propaganda since it does not report facts that go against interests of Western countries, accusing it of being one-sided and unreliable.

EN_UA_102990.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several paragraphs attempt to discredit Western media accusing them of being an instrument of propaganda which covers the alleged dangerous military actions of Ukraine, such as the destruction of the Noca Kakovka dam

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> At Last, a Credible Explanation of How Kakhovka Dam Was Blown Up by Eric Zuesse, The Duran: Though Western ‘news’ media have gotten their ‘explanation’ of this event from Ukraine’s Government, it never made sense that Russia would have wanted to flood, harm, and weaken, the entire western half of the territory that Russia now controls in the former Ukraine, including in Crimea (which was getting its water-supply from that dam). The anonymous author of the “Moon of Alabama” website has a long and almost flawless record of accurately exposing realities that mainstream U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media had been hiding, and the latest such is his June 13th “Did Russia Destroy The Nova Kakhovka Dam?” His report there turns upside-down and inside-out the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ that the dam had been bombed not by a missile, but by an explosive device which had been placed there by saboteurs whom Ukraine’s Government assumes were from Russia. U.S.-Government-approved ‘news’-media accept and amplify that assumption, but “MoA” does not. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ First, he quotes the New York Times and other U.S. Government mouthpieces presenting the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ of the blow-up; and then he rips it apart by noting the extremely relevant (but in U.S.-and-occupied lands ignored) fact, that on May 12th, Britain had supplied to Ukraine its “Storm Shadow” missiles that are designed to have a two-stage bombing-operation: first, a normal surface bomb, but then after it a fuse-ignited ground-penetrating bomb to explode deeper inside even a fortified and hardened underground target such as that dam was apparently blown up. The British-supplied Storm Shadow weapon is perfect for this type of destruction — exploding from deep underground, instead of from the surface. And whereas Russia doesn’t have any Storm Shadows, Ukraine definitely does — ever since May 12th. The present news-report about U.S.-and-allied lies is being simultaneously submitted for publication by all of the standard U.S.-Government mouthpiece propaganda-media, just in case any of them might finally want to go beyond their standard U.S.-Government-approved sources. Ever since at least late 2022, Russia has been warning that Ukraine’s government wants to blow up that dam. For example, on 1 November 2022, Reuters headlined “Russia announces wider evacuation of occupied southern Ukraine”, and reported that, “Due to the possibility of the use of prohibited methods of war by the Ukrainian regime, as well as information that Kyiv is preparing a massive missile strike on the Kakhovka hydroelectric station, there is an immediate danger of the Kherson region being flooded,” Vladimir Saldo, Russian-installed head of occupied Kherson province, said in a video message. “Given the situation, I have decided to expand the evacuation zone by 15 km from the Dnipro,” he said. “The decision will make it possible to create a layered defence in order to repel Ukrainian attacks and protect civilians.” Moscow has accused Kyiv of planning to use a so-called “dirty bomb” to spread radiation, or to blow up a dam to flood towns and villages in Kherson province. Kyiv says accusations it would use such tactics on its own territory are absurd, but that Russia might be planning such actions itself to blame Ukraine. … Saldo, the Russian-imposed occupation leader for the province, identified seven towns on the east bank that would now be evacuated, comprising the main populated settlements along that stretch of the river. Even U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media occasionally report relevant facts when they find them useful to mention in a ‘news’-report that has an anti-Russian “spin.” So: we know that Russia’s Government was trying to protect the residents in that region against this attack, but U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media have unquestioningly accepted the Ukrainian government’s accusation that Russia’s Government did it. And, now, an extremely likely explanation has finally been provided, which implicates both Ukraine’s government and UK’s Government as having done it. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs depict Western media as being in bad faith, amplifying the Ukrainian narrative without providing evidence to back it up.

EN_UA_102990.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several paragraphs attempt to discredit Western media accusing them of being an instrument of propaganda which covers the alleged dangerous military actions of Ukraine, such as the destruction of the Noca Kakovka dam

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> At Last, a Credible Explanation of How Kakhovka Dam Was Blown Up by Eric Zuesse, The Duran: Though Western ‘news’ media have gotten their ‘explanation’ of this event from Ukraine’s Government, it never made sense that Russia would have wanted to flood, harm, and weaken, the entire western half of the territory that Russia now controls in the former Ukraine, including in Crimea (which was getting its water-supply from that dam). The anonymous author of the “Moon of Alabama” website has a long and almost flawless record of accurately exposing realities that mainstream U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media had been hiding, and the latest such is his June 13th “Did Russia Destroy The Nova Kakhovka Dam?” His report there turns upside-down and inside-out the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ that the dam had been bombed not by a missile, but by an explosive device which had been placed there by saboteurs whom Ukraine’s Government assumes were from Russia. U.S.-Government-approved ‘news’-media accept and amplify that assumption, but “MoA” does not. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ First, he quotes the New York Times and other U.S. Government mouthpieces presenting the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ of the blow-up; and then he rips it apart by noting the extremely relevant (but in U.S.-and-occupied lands ignored) fact, that on May 12th, Britain had supplied to Ukraine its “Storm Shadow” missiles that are designed to have a two-stage bombing-operation: first, a normal surface bomb, but then after it a fuse-ignited ground-penetrating bomb to explode deeper inside even a fortified and hardened underground target such as that dam was apparently blown up. The British-supplied Storm Shadow weapon is perfect for this type of destruction — exploding from deep underground, instead of from the surface. And whereas Russia doesn’t have any Storm Shadows, Ukraine definitely does — ever since May 12th. The present news-report about U.S.-and-allied lies is being simultaneously submitted for publication by all of the standard U.S.-Government mouthpiece propaganda-media, just in case any of them might finally want to go beyond their standard U.S.-Government-approved sources. Ever since at least late 2022, Russia has been warning that Ukraine’s government wants to blow up that dam. For example, on 1 November 2022, Reuters headlined “Russia announces wider evacuation of occupied southern Ukraine”, and reported that, “Due to the possibility of the use of prohibited methods of war by the Ukrainian regime, as well as information that Kyiv is preparing a massive missile strike on the Kakhovka hydroelectric station, there is an immediate danger of the Kherson region being flooded,” Vladimir Saldo, Russian-installed head of occupied Kherson province, said in a video message. “Given the situation, I have decided to expand the evacuation zone by 15 km from the Dnipro,” he said. “The decision will make it possible to create a layered defence in order to repel Ukrainian attacks and protect civilians.” Moscow has accused Kyiv of planning to use a so-called “dirty bomb” to spread radiation, or to blow up a dam to flood towns and villages in Kherson province. Kyiv says accusations it would use such tactics on its own territory are absurd, but that Russia might be planning such actions itself to blame Ukraine. … Saldo, the Russian-imposed occupation leader for the province, identified seven towns on the east bank that would now be evacuated, comprising the main populated settlements along that stretch of the river. Even U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media occasionally report relevant facts when they find them useful to mention in a ‘news’-report that has an anti-Russian “spin.” So: we know that Russia’s Government was trying to protect the residents in that region against this attack, but U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media have unquestioningly accepted the Ukrainian government’s accusation that Russia’s Government did it. And, now, an extremely likely explanation has finally been provided, which implicates both Ukraine’s government and UK’s Government as having done it. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the text conveys a narrative claiming that Western media is an instrument of propaganda due to adopt and amplify Ukraine's narrative about the destruction of the Nova Kakhovka Dam, while at the same time concealing the responsibility of UK, who provided weapons to Ukraine that can be used to attack infrastructure

EN_UA_102990.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several paragraphs attempt to discredit Western media accusing them of being an instrument of propaganda which covers the alleged dangerous military actions of Ukraine, such as the destruction of the Noca Kakovka dam

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> At Last, a Credible Explanation of How Kakhovka Dam Was Blown Up by Eric Zuesse, The Duran: Though Western ‘news’ media have gotten their ‘explanation’ of this event from Ukraine’s Government, it never made sense that Russia would have wanted to flood, harm, and weaken, the entire western half of the territory that Russia now controls in the former Ukraine, including in Crimea (which was getting its water-supply from that dam). The anonymous author of the “Moon of Alabama” website has a long and almost flawless record of accurately exposing realities that mainstream U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media had been hiding, and the latest such is his June 13th “Did Russia Destroy The Nova Kakhovka Dam?” His report there turns upside-down and inside-out the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ that the dam had been bombed not by a missile, but by an explosive device which had been placed there by saboteurs whom Ukraine’s Government assumes were from Russia. U.S.-Government-approved ‘news’-media accept and amplify that assumption, but “MoA” does not. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ First, he quotes the New York Times and other U.S. Government mouthpieces presenting the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ of the blow-up; and then he rips it apart by noting the extremely relevant (but in U.S.-and-occupied lands ignored) fact, that on May 12th, Britain had supplied to Ukraine its “Storm Shadow” missiles that are designed to have a two-stage bombing-operation: first, a normal surface bomb, but then after it a fuse-ignited ground-penetrating bomb to explode deeper inside even a fortified and hardened underground target such as that dam was apparently blown up. The British-supplied Storm Shadow weapon is perfect for this type of destruction — exploding from deep underground, instead of from the surface. And whereas Russia doesn’t have any Storm Shadows, Ukraine definitely does — ever since May 12th. The present news-report about U.S.-and-allied lies is being simultaneously submitted for publication by all of the standard U.S.-Government mouthpiece propaganda-media, just in case any of them might finally want to go beyond their standard U.S.-Government-approved sources. Ever since at least late 2022, Russia has been warning that Ukraine’s government wants to blow up that dam. For example, on 1 November 2022, Reuters headlined “Russia announces wider evacuation of occupied southern Ukraine”, and reported that, “Due to the possibility of the use of prohibited methods of war by the Ukrainian regime, as well as information that Kyiv is preparing a massive missile strike on the Kakhovka hydroelectric station, there is an immediate danger of the Kherson region being flooded,” Vladimir Saldo, Russian-installed head of occupied Kherson province, said in a video message. “Given the situation, I have decided to expand the evacuation zone by 15 km from the Dnipro,” he said. “The decision will make it possible to create a layered defence in order to repel Ukrainian attacks and protect civilians.” Moscow has accused Kyiv of planning to use a so-called “dirty bomb” to spread radiation, or to blow up a dam to flood towns and villages in Kherson province. Kyiv says accusations it would use such tactics on its own territory are absurd, but that Russia might be planning such actions itself to blame Ukraine. … Saldo, the Russian-imposed occupation leader for the province, identified seven towns on the east bank that would now be evacuated, comprising the main populated settlements along that stretch of the river. Even U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media occasionally report relevant facts when they find them useful to mention in a ‘news’-report that has an anti-Russian “spin.” So: we know that Russia’s Government was trying to protect the residents in that region against this attack, but U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media have unquestioningly accepted the Ukrainian government’s accusation that Russia’s Government did it. And, now, an extremely likely explanation has finally been provided, which implicates both Ukraine’s government and UK’s Government as having done it. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article suggest that Western media is not reliable as they blindly trust information provided by Ukrainian officials while not considering information from Russian officials

EN_UA_102990.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several paragraphs attempt to discredit Western media accusing them of being an instrument of propaganda which covers the alleged dangerous military actions of Ukraine, such as the destruction of the Noca Kakovka dam

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> At Last, a Credible Explanation of How Kakhovka Dam Was Blown Up by Eric Zuesse, The Duran: Though Western ‘news’ media have gotten their ‘explanation’ of this event from Ukraine’s Government, it never made sense that Russia would have wanted to flood, harm, and weaken, the entire western half of the territory that Russia now controls in the former Ukraine, including in Crimea (which was getting its water-supply from that dam). The anonymous author of the “Moon of Alabama” website has a long and almost flawless record of accurately exposing realities that mainstream U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media had been hiding, and the latest such is his June 13th “Did Russia Destroy The Nova Kakhovka Dam?” His report there turns upside-down and inside-out the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ that the dam had been bombed not by a missile, but by an explosive device which had been placed there by saboteurs whom Ukraine’s Government assumes were from Russia. U.S.-Government-approved ‘news’-media accept and amplify that assumption, but “MoA” does not. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ First, he quotes the New York Times and other U.S. Government mouthpieces presenting the Ukrainian Government’s ‘explanation’ of the blow-up; and then he rips it apart by noting the extremely relevant (but in U.S.-and-occupied lands ignored) fact, that on May 12th, Britain had supplied to Ukraine its “Storm Shadow” missiles that are designed to have a two-stage bombing-operation: first, a normal surface bomb, but then after it a fuse-ignited ground-penetrating bomb to explode deeper inside even a fortified and hardened underground target such as that dam was apparently blown up. The British-supplied Storm Shadow weapon is perfect for this type of destruction — exploding from deep underground, instead of from the surface. And whereas Russia doesn’t have any Storm Shadows, Ukraine definitely does — ever since May 12th. The present news-report about U.S.-and-allied lies is being simultaneously submitted for publication by all of the standard U.S.-Government mouthpiece propaganda-media, just in case any of them might finally want to go beyond their standard U.S.-Government-approved sources. Ever since at least late 2022, Russia has been warning that Ukraine’s government wants to blow up that dam. For example, on 1 November 2022, Reuters headlined “Russia announces wider evacuation of occupied southern Ukraine”, and reported that, “Due to the possibility of the use of prohibited methods of war by the Ukrainian regime, as well as information that Kyiv is preparing a massive missile strike on the Kakhovka hydroelectric station, there is an immediate danger of the Kherson region being flooded,” Vladimir Saldo, Russian-installed head of occupied Kherson province, said in a video message. “Given the situation, I have decided to expand the evacuation zone by 15 km from the Dnipro,” he said. “The decision will make it possible to create a layered defence in order to repel Ukrainian attacks and protect civilians.” Moscow has accused Kyiv of planning to use a so-called “dirty bomb” to spread radiation, or to blow up a dam to flood towns and villages in Kherson province. Kyiv says accusations it would use such tactics on its own territory are absurd, but that Russia might be planning such actions itself to blame Ukraine. … Saldo, the Russian-imposed occupation leader for the province, identified seven towns on the east bank that would now be evacuated, comprising the main populated settlements along that stretch of the river. Even U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media occasionally report relevant facts when they find them useful to mention in a ‘news’-report that has an anti-Russian “spin.” So: we know that Russia’s Government was trying to protect the residents in that region against this attack, but U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media have unquestioningly accepted the Ukrainian government’s accusation that Russia’s Government did it. And, now, an extremely likely explanation has finally been provided, which implicates both Ukraine’s government and UK’s Government as having done it. </document> <category> URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article citing Russian news to attack Western media outlets accusing them of ampifying Russian narrative without fact checking and having anti-Russia bias

EN_UA_102990.txt

URW: Distrust towards Media

URW: Distrust towards Media: Western media is an instrument of propaganda

Several paragraphs attempt to discredit Western media accusing them of being an instrument of propaganda which covers the alleged dangerous military actions of Ukraine, such as the destruction of the Noca Kakovka dam

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Filling the Blank Spots in Our National History by Ron Unz, The Unz Review: The Truth About the JFK Assassination, the 9/11 Attacks, and the Holocaust Back in 1959 Vice President Richard Nixon visited Moscow and held his famous “Kitchen debate” with Soviet leader Nikita Khruschev. Nixon favorably compared the standard of living of American suburbanites to that of their Russian counterparts under Communism. Criticizing Soviet society was a serious crime in those days, but I doubt that the Russians ever considered arresting Nixon and giving him a ten year stretch in the gulag for “anti-Soviet agitation.” Not even Maoist China at the height of its Cultural Revolution would have considered such a thing. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ But late last week, on the eve of a Russia-China leadership summit in Moscow, Europe’s International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, the man who controls the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, whose striking power is further enhanced by its revolutionary hypersonic delivery systems. The charges against Putin were that he had ordered the humanitarian evacuation of children from the dangerous Ukraine warzone, and the ICC also ordered the arrest of Maria Lvova-Belova, the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights. Yet oddly enough, no ICC action had ever been taken against American Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who had famously declared in 1996 that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children brought about by the American economic sanctions she supported was “worth it.” Indeed, in 2016 National Security Advisor John Bolton leveled harsh threats against ICC judges if they dared take legal action against any Americans accused of torture and murder, and many have noticed the strange lack of ICC even-handedness over the years. The International Criminal Court that we don’t recognize has issued an arrest warrant against Putin for evacuating children from a Warzone that is getting shelled with our weapons and we are the ones who killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2. pic.twitter.com/e8ffVvChbN — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 18, 2023 But issuing a press release or even an arrest warrant does not necessarily determine events in real life, and the Moscow summit between Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping has hardly been disturbed. Taken together, Russia and China control a substantial fraction of the world’s natural resources and industrial capacity, and although their global propaganda presence is weak, those former factors are more important as elements of real world power. As an example of this, last week Saudi Arabia and Iran, two of the most important Middle Eastern countries, announced in Beijing that after negotiations held under Chinese auspices they had reestablished diplomatic relations despite many years of bitter hostility: - Russia, China, Iran…and Saudi Arabia? Ron Unz • The Unz Review • March 13, 2023 • 3,200 Words Over the last few months, America and its Western allies have declared their unilateral right to set a cap on the price Russia charges for its oil, seeking to use their dominance over the international financial infrastructure to reduce Russian revenue on its sale of natural resources to other countries. Russia and Saudi Arabia are two of the world’s leading oil exporters, and with the latter nation now having dramatically shifted towards the Russia-China alliance, its leadership recently declared that they would ban sales to any country that sought to impose a price cap on its oil. </document> <category> URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article describes a situation in which Russia and China have international support from the countries which want to establish cooperation with Russia, while highlighting the fact that these countries are being targeted by ICC as well.

EN_UA_013617.txt

URW: Praise of Russia

URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people

The text has several paragraphs criticising international institutions considered part of the Western world as hypocritical. and adopting double standards. Also, the US and the West are described as Russophobic as well as attempting to damage Russia and other countries such as China, Saudi Arabia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Filling the Blank Spots in Our National History by Ron Unz, The Unz Review: The Truth About the JFK Assassination, the 9/11 Attacks, and the Holocaust Back in 1959 Vice President Richard Nixon visited Moscow and held his famous “Kitchen debate” with Soviet leader Nikita Khruschev. Nixon favorably compared the standard of living of American suburbanites to that of their Russian counterparts under Communism. Criticizing Soviet society was a serious crime in those days, but I doubt that the Russians ever considered arresting Nixon and giving him a ten year stretch in the gulag for “anti-Soviet agitation.” Not even Maoist China at the height of its Cultural Revolution would have considered such a thing. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ But late last week, on the eve of a Russia-China leadership summit in Moscow, Europe’s International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, the man who controls the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, whose striking power is further enhanced by its revolutionary hypersonic delivery systems. The charges against Putin were that he had ordered the humanitarian evacuation of children from the dangerous Ukraine warzone, and the ICC also ordered the arrest of Maria Lvova-Belova, the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights. Yet oddly enough, no ICC action had ever been taken against American Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who had famously declared in 1996 that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children brought about by the American economic sanctions she supported was “worth it.” Indeed, in 2016 National Security Advisor John Bolton leveled harsh threats against ICC judges if they dared take legal action against any Americans accused of torture and murder, and many have noticed the strange lack of ICC even-handedness over the years. The International Criminal Court that we don’t recognize has issued an arrest warrant against Putin for evacuating children from a Warzone that is getting shelled with our weapons and we are the ones who killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2. pic.twitter.com/e8ffVvChbN — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 18, 2023 But issuing a press release or even an arrest warrant does not necessarily determine events in real life, and the Moscow summit between Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping has hardly been disturbed. Taken together, Russia and China control a substantial fraction of the world’s natural resources and industrial capacity, and although their global propaganda presence is weak, those former factors are more important as elements of real world power. As an example of this, last week Saudi Arabia and Iran, two of the most important Middle Eastern countries, announced in Beijing that after negotiations held under Chinese auspices they had reestablished diplomatic relations despite many years of bitter hostility: - Russia, China, Iran…and Saudi Arabia? Ron Unz • The Unz Review • March 13, 2023 • 3,200 Words Over the last few months, America and its Western allies have declared their unilateral right to set a cap on the price Russia charges for its oil, seeking to use their dominance over the international financial infrastructure to reduce Russian revenue on its sale of natural resources to other countries. Russia and Saudi Arabia are two of the world’s leading oil exporters, and with the latter nation now having dramatically shifted towards the Russia-China alliance, its leadership recently declared that they would ban sales to any country that sought to impose a price cap on its oil. </document> <category> URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text praises Russia, arguing that it has the support of many countries in the world. It targets the US and the West suggesting that they are the geopolitcal opponents of Russia.

EN_UA_013617.txt

URW: Praise of Russia

URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people

The text has several paragraphs criticising international institutions considered part of the Western world as hypocritical. and adopting double standards. Also, the US and the West are described as Russophobic as well as attempting to damage Russia and other countries such as China, Saudi Arabia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Filling the Blank Spots in Our National History by Ron Unz, The Unz Review: The Truth About the JFK Assassination, the 9/11 Attacks, and the Holocaust Back in 1959 Vice President Richard Nixon visited Moscow and held his famous “Kitchen debate” with Soviet leader Nikita Khruschev. Nixon favorably compared the standard of living of American suburbanites to that of their Russian counterparts under Communism. Criticizing Soviet society was a serious crime in those days, but I doubt that the Russians ever considered arresting Nixon and giving him a ten year stretch in the gulag for “anti-Soviet agitation.” Not even Maoist China at the height of its Cultural Revolution would have considered such a thing. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ But late last week, on the eve of a Russia-China leadership summit in Moscow, Europe’s International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, the man who controls the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, whose striking power is further enhanced by its revolutionary hypersonic delivery systems. The charges against Putin were that he had ordered the humanitarian evacuation of children from the dangerous Ukraine warzone, and the ICC also ordered the arrest of Maria Lvova-Belova, the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights. Yet oddly enough, no ICC action had ever been taken against American Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who had famously declared in 1996 that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children brought about by the American economic sanctions she supported was “worth it.” Indeed, in 2016 National Security Advisor John Bolton leveled harsh threats against ICC judges if they dared take legal action against any Americans accused of torture and murder, and many have noticed the strange lack of ICC even-handedness over the years. The International Criminal Court that we don’t recognize has issued an arrest warrant against Putin for evacuating children from a Warzone that is getting shelled with our weapons and we are the ones who killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2. pic.twitter.com/e8ffVvChbN — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 18, 2023 But issuing a press release or even an arrest warrant does not necessarily determine events in real life, and the Moscow summit between Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping has hardly been disturbed. Taken together, Russia and China control a substantial fraction of the world’s natural resources and industrial capacity, and although their global propaganda presence is weak, those former factors are more important as elements of real world power. As an example of this, last week Saudi Arabia and Iran, two of the most important Middle Eastern countries, announced in Beijing that after negotiations held under Chinese auspices they had reestablished diplomatic relations despite many years of bitter hostility: - Russia, China, Iran…and Saudi Arabia? Ron Unz • The Unz Review • March 13, 2023 • 3,200 Words Over the last few months, America and its Western allies have declared their unilateral right to set a cap on the price Russia charges for its oil, seeking to use their dominance over the international financial infrastructure to reduce Russian revenue on its sale of natural resources to other countries. Russia and Saudi Arabia are two of the world’s leading oil exporters, and with the latter nation now having dramatically shifted towards the Russia-China alliance, its leadership recently declared that they would ban sales to any country that sought to impose a price cap on its oil. </document> <category> URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text praises Russia on multiple occasions suggesting that the country has international support from different nations. Moreover, it suggests that these countries are providing real help to Russia.

EN_UA_013617.txt

URW: Praise of Russia

URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people

The text has several paragraphs criticising international institutions considered part of the Western world as hypocritical. and adopting double standards. Also, the US and the West are described as Russophobic as well as attempting to damage Russia and other countries such as China, Saudi Arabia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Filling the Blank Spots in Our National History by Ron Unz, The Unz Review: The Truth About the JFK Assassination, the 9/11 Attacks, and the Holocaust Back in 1959 Vice President Richard Nixon visited Moscow and held his famous “Kitchen debate” with Soviet leader Nikita Khruschev. Nixon favorably compared the standard of living of American suburbanites to that of their Russian counterparts under Communism. Criticizing Soviet society was a serious crime in those days, but I doubt that the Russians ever considered arresting Nixon and giving him a ten year stretch in the gulag for “anti-Soviet agitation.” Not even Maoist China at the height of its Cultural Revolution would have considered such a thing. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ But late last week, on the eve of a Russia-China leadership summit in Moscow, Europe’s International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, the man who controls the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, whose striking power is further enhanced by its revolutionary hypersonic delivery systems. The charges against Putin were that he had ordered the humanitarian evacuation of children from the dangerous Ukraine warzone, and the ICC also ordered the arrest of Maria Lvova-Belova, the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights. Yet oddly enough, no ICC action had ever been taken against American Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who had famously declared in 1996 that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children brought about by the American economic sanctions she supported was “worth it.” Indeed, in 2016 National Security Advisor John Bolton leveled harsh threats against ICC judges if they dared take legal action against any Americans accused of torture and murder, and many have noticed the strange lack of ICC even-handedness over the years. The International Criminal Court that we don’t recognize has issued an arrest warrant against Putin for evacuating children from a Warzone that is getting shelled with our weapons and we are the ones who killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2. pic.twitter.com/e8ffVvChbN — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 18, 2023 But issuing a press release or even an arrest warrant does not necessarily determine events in real life, and the Moscow summit between Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping has hardly been disturbed. Taken together, Russia and China control a substantial fraction of the world’s natural resources and industrial capacity, and although their global propaganda presence is weak, those former factors are more important as elements of real world power. As an example of this, last week Saudi Arabia and Iran, two of the most important Middle Eastern countries, announced in Beijing that after negotiations held under Chinese auspices they had reestablished diplomatic relations despite many years of bitter hostility: - Russia, China, Iran…and Saudi Arabia? Ron Unz • The Unz Review • March 13, 2023 • 3,200 Words Over the last few months, America and its Western allies have declared their unilateral right to set a cap on the price Russia charges for its oil, seeking to use their dominance over the international financial infrastructure to reduce Russian revenue on its sale of natural resources to other countries. Russia and Saudi Arabia are two of the world’s leading oil exporters, and with the latter nation now having dramatically shifted towards the Russia-China alliance, its leadership recently declared that they would ban sales to any country that sought to impose a price cap on its oil. </document> <category> URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article quotes multiple paragraphs saying that Russia has the support of multiple countries, as well as prominent people. The narrative overall conveys the idea that Russia has support from several countries and people, who consider the US actions hypocritical and unjust.

EN_UA_013617.txt

URW: Praise of Russia

URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people

The text has several paragraphs criticising international institutions considered part of the Western world as hypocritical. and adopting double standards. Also, the US and the West are described as Russophobic as well as attempting to damage Russia and other countries such as China, Saudi Arabia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Filling the Blank Spots in Our National History by Ron Unz, The Unz Review: The Truth About the JFK Assassination, the 9/11 Attacks, and the Holocaust Back in 1959 Vice President Richard Nixon visited Moscow and held his famous “Kitchen debate” with Soviet leader Nikita Khruschev. Nixon favorably compared the standard of living of American suburbanites to that of their Russian counterparts under Communism. Criticizing Soviet society was a serious crime in those days, but I doubt that the Russians ever considered arresting Nixon and giving him a ten year stretch in the gulag for “anti-Soviet agitation.” Not even Maoist China at the height of its Cultural Revolution would have considered such a thing. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ But late last week, on the eve of a Russia-China leadership summit in Moscow, Europe’s International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, the man who controls the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, whose striking power is further enhanced by its revolutionary hypersonic delivery systems. The charges against Putin were that he had ordered the humanitarian evacuation of children from the dangerous Ukraine warzone, and the ICC also ordered the arrest of Maria Lvova-Belova, the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights. Yet oddly enough, no ICC action had ever been taken against American Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who had famously declared in 1996 that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children brought about by the American economic sanctions she supported was “worth it.” Indeed, in 2016 National Security Advisor John Bolton leveled harsh threats against ICC judges if they dared take legal action against any Americans accused of torture and murder, and many have noticed the strange lack of ICC even-handedness over the years. The International Criminal Court that we don’t recognize has issued an arrest warrant against Putin for evacuating children from a Warzone that is getting shelled with our weapons and we are the ones who killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2. pic.twitter.com/e8ffVvChbN — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 18, 2023 But issuing a press release or even an arrest warrant does not necessarily determine events in real life, and the Moscow summit between Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping has hardly been disturbed. Taken together, Russia and China control a substantial fraction of the world’s natural resources and industrial capacity, and although their global propaganda presence is weak, those former factors are more important as elements of real world power. As an example of this, last week Saudi Arabia and Iran, two of the most important Middle Eastern countries, announced in Beijing that after negotiations held under Chinese auspices they had reestablished diplomatic relations despite many years of bitter hostility: - Russia, China, Iran…and Saudi Arabia? Ron Unz • The Unz Review • March 13, 2023 • 3,200 Words Over the last few months, America and its Western allies have declared their unilateral right to set a cap on the price Russia charges for its oil, seeking to use their dominance over the international financial infrastructure to reduce Russian revenue on its sale of natural resources to other countries. Russia and Saudi Arabia are two of the world’s leading oil exporters, and with the latter nation now having dramatically shifted towards the Russia-China alliance, its leadership recently declared that they would ban sales to any country that sought to impose a price cap on its oil. </document> <category> URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article suggesting Russia has international support from various countries including Saudi Arabia and Iran, in contrast to the West

EN_UA_013617.txt

URW: Praise of Russia

URW: Praise of Russia: Russia has international support from a number of countries and people

The text has several paragraphs criticising international institutions considered part of the Western world as hypocritical. and adopting double standards. Also, the US and the West are described as Russophobic as well as attempting to damage Russia and other countries such as China, Saudi Arabia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How NATO powers are using the U.K.’s World War I model to lure Russia into the next big global war by Leo Hohmann, Leo Hohmann: Using duplicity, deception and secret alliances, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner backed the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set the Germans up to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the Germans to the point where war was the only option. German generals were caught strategizing several weeks ago on how to bomb Russia’s main bridge to Crimea. This would be an act of aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as guaranteed to draw a harsh military response from Russia, possibly even including a nuclear strike against Berlin. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ And that has led to an admission by German officials that their military is woefully unprepared to take on Russia. If German generals and politicians truly want to provoke a war with Russia, they had better slow down and wait for their military to catch up to the political rhetoric coming out of Berlin. A March 14 article by John Cody at Remix News shows that the German Army lacks the personnel, equipment and infrastructure to wage a major war of any kind, let alone with a nuclear-armed military superpower like Russia. “Germany’s own military and government are painting such a dire picture of the armed forces that there are now calls from some of the most powerful politicians in the country to reinstate mandatory military service,” Cody writes. Yes, a military draft. A video produced by Remix News details testimony provided by Eva Högl, German Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces, who provided catastrophic details about the state of the German military. It is shocking in terms of its candor regarding the current state of the German armed forces. NEW: 🇩🇪 Germany may bring back the DRAFT. The country’s army is falling apart, and the government now openly admits it. pic.twitter.com/KxwKPwDdSd — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 13, 2024 She finds it “really impressive” that Germany has emptied out its military defense stocks by handing it over to Ukraine to be wasted in a losing war with Russia. That sounds like an admission of treason in the wide open. But wait. There’s more. Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London. An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union. The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia. According to Wikipedia, “the Weimar Triangle exists mostly in the form of summit meetings between the leaders of the three countries and of their foreign ministers. The collaboration between member states includes inter-parliamentary contacts, military, scientific and cultural co-operation. The most recent summit of leaders occurred in Paris on June 12, 2023.” (Emphasis mine) </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article and the video talk about how Germany, as a part of the Western world, is incompetent and not capable of military actions which would justify their actions

EN_UA_024050.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The article is about how Germany tries to instigate war with Russia despite publicly admitted that its military force is in horrible condition. The article emphasies how ironic it is that while having such incompetent military, Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How NATO powers are using the U.K.’s World War I model to lure Russia into the next big global war by Leo Hohmann, Leo Hohmann: Using duplicity, deception and secret alliances, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner backed the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set the Germans up to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the Germans to the point where war was the only option. German generals were caught strategizing several weeks ago on how to bomb Russia’s main bridge to Crimea. This would be an act of aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as guaranteed to draw a harsh military response from Russia, possibly even including a nuclear strike against Berlin. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ And that has led to an admission by German officials that their military is woefully unprepared to take on Russia. If German generals and politicians truly want to provoke a war with Russia, they had better slow down and wait for their military to catch up to the political rhetoric coming out of Berlin. A March 14 article by John Cody at Remix News shows that the German Army lacks the personnel, equipment and infrastructure to wage a major war of any kind, let alone with a nuclear-armed military superpower like Russia. “Germany’s own military and government are painting such a dire picture of the armed forces that there are now calls from some of the most powerful politicians in the country to reinstate mandatory military service,” Cody writes. Yes, a military draft. A video produced by Remix News details testimony provided by Eva Högl, German Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces, who provided catastrophic details about the state of the German military. It is shocking in terms of its candor regarding the current state of the German armed forces. NEW: 🇩🇪 Germany may bring back the DRAFT. The country’s army is falling apart, and the government now openly admits it. pic.twitter.com/KxwKPwDdSd — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 13, 2024 She finds it “really impressive” that Germany has emptied out its military defense stocks by handing it over to Ukraine to be wasted in a losing war with Russia. That sounds like an admission of treason in the wide open. But wait. There’s more. Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London. An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union. The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia. According to Wikipedia, “the Weimar Triangle exists mostly in the form of summit meetings between the leaders of the three countries and of their foreign ministers. The collaboration between member states includes inter-parliamentary contacts, military, scientific and cultural co-operation. The most recent summit of leaders occurred in Paris on June 12, 2023.” (Emphasis mine) </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise Western countries such as Germany accusing them of not having the military power to face Russia, underlining how contradictory it is that such countries want to go to war.

EN_UA_024050.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The article is about how Germany tries to instigate war with Russia despite publicly admitted that its military force is in horrible condition. The article emphasies how ironic it is that while having such incompetent military, Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How NATO powers are using the U.K.’s World War I model to lure Russia into the next big global war by Leo Hohmann, Leo Hohmann: Using duplicity, deception and secret alliances, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner backed the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set the Germans up to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the Germans to the point where war was the only option. German generals were caught strategizing several weeks ago on how to bomb Russia’s main bridge to Crimea. This would be an act of aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as guaranteed to draw a harsh military response from Russia, possibly even including a nuclear strike against Berlin. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ And that has led to an admission by German officials that their military is woefully unprepared to take on Russia. If German generals and politicians truly want to provoke a war with Russia, they had better slow down and wait for their military to catch up to the political rhetoric coming out of Berlin. A March 14 article by John Cody at Remix News shows that the German Army lacks the personnel, equipment and infrastructure to wage a major war of any kind, let alone with a nuclear-armed military superpower like Russia. “Germany’s own military and government are painting such a dire picture of the armed forces that there are now calls from some of the most powerful politicians in the country to reinstate mandatory military service,” Cody writes. Yes, a military draft. A video produced by Remix News details testimony provided by Eva Högl, German Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces, who provided catastrophic details about the state of the German military. It is shocking in terms of its candor regarding the current state of the German armed forces. NEW: 🇩🇪 Germany may bring back the DRAFT. The country’s army is falling apart, and the government now openly admits it. pic.twitter.com/KxwKPwDdSd — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 13, 2024 She finds it “really impressive” that Germany has emptied out its military defense stocks by handing it over to Ukraine to be wasted in a losing war with Russia. That sounds like an admission of treason in the wide open. But wait. There’s more. Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London. An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union. The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia. According to Wikipedia, “the Weimar Triangle exists mostly in the form of summit meetings between the leaders of the three countries and of their foreign ministers. The collaboration between member states includes inter-parliamentary contacts, military, scientific and cultural co-operation. The most recent summit of leaders occurred in Paris on June 12, 2023.” (Emphasis mine) </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several passages address the alleged weakness of Western countries, arguing that the situation in Germany is especially alarming as it is revealed that the army is in a really bad shape.

EN_UA_024050.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The article is about how Germany tries to instigate war with Russia despite publicly admitted that its military force is in horrible condition. The article emphasies how ironic it is that while having such incompetent military, Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How NATO powers are using the U.K.’s World War I model to lure Russia into the next big global war by Leo Hohmann, Leo Hohmann: Using duplicity, deception and secret alliances, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner backed the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set the Germans up to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the Germans to the point where war was the only option. German generals were caught strategizing several weeks ago on how to bomb Russia’s main bridge to Crimea. This would be an act of aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as guaranteed to draw a harsh military response from Russia, possibly even including a nuclear strike against Berlin. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ And that has led to an admission by German officials that their military is woefully unprepared to take on Russia. If German generals and politicians truly want to provoke a war with Russia, they had better slow down and wait for their military to catch up to the political rhetoric coming out of Berlin. A March 14 article by John Cody at Remix News shows that the German Army lacks the personnel, equipment and infrastructure to wage a major war of any kind, let alone with a nuclear-armed military superpower like Russia. “Germany’s own military and government are painting such a dire picture of the armed forces that there are now calls from some of the most powerful politicians in the country to reinstate mandatory military service,” Cody writes. Yes, a military draft. A video produced by Remix News details testimony provided by Eva Högl, German Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces, who provided catastrophic details about the state of the German military. It is shocking in terms of its candor regarding the current state of the German armed forces. NEW: 🇩🇪 Germany may bring back the DRAFT. The country’s army is falling apart, and the government now openly admits it. pic.twitter.com/KxwKPwDdSd — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 13, 2024 She finds it “really impressive” that Germany has emptied out its military defense stocks by handing it over to Ukraine to be wasted in a losing war with Russia. That sounds like an admission of treason in the wide open. But wait. There’s more. Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London. An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union. The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia. According to Wikipedia, “the Weimar Triangle exists mostly in the form of summit meetings between the leaders of the three countries and of their foreign ministers. The collaboration between member states includes inter-parliamentary contacts, military, scientific and cultural co-operation. The most recent summit of leaders occurred in Paris on June 12, 2023.” (Emphasis mine) </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative depicting the military capacities of Western countries as being weak or in decay. Specifically, it claims that Germany lacks the military potential to confront Russia

EN_UA_024050.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The article is about how Germany tries to instigate war with Russia despite publicly admitted that its military force is in horrible condition. The article emphasies how ironic it is that while having such incompetent military, Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> How NATO powers are using the U.K.’s World War I model to lure Russia into the next big global war by Leo Hohmann, Leo Hohmann: Using duplicity, deception and secret alliances, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner backed the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set the Germans up to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the Germans to the point where war was the only option. German generals were caught strategizing several weeks ago on how to bomb Russia’s main bridge to Crimea. This would be an act of aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as guaranteed to draw a harsh military response from Russia, possibly even including a nuclear strike against Berlin. TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/ And that has led to an admission by German officials that their military is woefully unprepared to take on Russia. If German generals and politicians truly want to provoke a war with Russia, they had better slow down and wait for their military to catch up to the political rhetoric coming out of Berlin. A March 14 article by John Cody at Remix News shows that the German Army lacks the personnel, equipment and infrastructure to wage a major war of any kind, let alone with a nuclear-armed military superpower like Russia. “Germany’s own military and government are painting such a dire picture of the armed forces that there are now calls from some of the most powerful politicians in the country to reinstate mandatory military service,” Cody writes. Yes, a military draft. A video produced by Remix News details testimony provided by Eva Högl, German Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces, who provided catastrophic details about the state of the German military. It is shocking in terms of its candor regarding the current state of the German armed forces. NEW: 🇩🇪 Germany may bring back the DRAFT. The country’s army is falling apart, and the government now openly admits it. pic.twitter.com/KxwKPwDdSd — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 13, 2024 She finds it “really impressive” that Germany has emptied out its military defense stocks by handing it over to Ukraine to be wasted in a losing war with Russia. That sounds like an admission of treason in the wide open. But wait. There’s more. Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London. An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union. The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia. According to Wikipedia, “the Weimar Triangle exists mostly in the form of summit meetings between the leaders of the three countries and of their foreign ministers. The collaboration between member states includes inter-parliamentary contacts, military, scientific and cultural co-operation. The most recent summit of leaders occurred in Paris on June 12, 2023.” (Emphasis mine) </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise NATO and Western countries underlining their weaknesses, giving multiple examples. These weaknesses are considered detrimental for Western countries and highlight that Western countries have no right to talk about war with Russia and Ukraine.

EN_UA_024050.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The article is about how Germany tries to instigate war with Russia despite publicly admitted that its military force is in horrible condition. The article emphasies how ironic it is that while having such incompetent military, Germany

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Threat from the Kremlin’s Foolish, Never-ending, “limited military operation” in Ukraine continues to Rise Putin’s unwillingness to use sufficient force to end a conflict that should not have lasted one week is leading to much wider war. NATO at the summit in Vilnius is likely to approve plans to increase the number of troops in a state of high alert to 300,000, as well as other changes in the military structure, said Secretary General Stoltenberg. Plans to increase the number of its rapid reaction forces to more than 300 thousand. people from 40,000. Stoltenberg said in June 2022. He noted that this will take place within the framework of the implementation of new regional plans. In May, Stoltenberg said that these plans would be described as a bloc to deter and protect NATO allies from any aggression: they contain precise demands for the transformation of the armed forces, including their deployment. The Secretary General also announced more Allied exercises, bringing more forces into combat readiness, strengthening the command structure and control in the alliance. As reported in March, the increase in the number of the military may imply the emergence of two echelons. The first will be 100,000. soldiers ready to be sent within ten days. The second echelon is reinforcements, that is, the military sent for support, they will have to be ready for the transfer within 10-30 days. The Spanish El Pais reported in May that the bloc was finalizing a common strategy to counter the threat from Russia and terrorism. This strategy, according to sources of the publication, is changing NATO’s approaches to deploying forces in different regions and responding to threats from Moscow. Подробнее на РБК: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/06/2023/6489e6f39a794778d61881b4 The picture of widening war is beginning to form: Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states Karaganov’s description of the Western World as “anti-human ideologies: the denial of family, homeland, history, love between men and women, faith, service to higher ideals, everything that is human,” shows a rising realization that Russia sees itself confronted by a Satanic force that must be destroyed. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article about how dangerous Putin's operation in Ukraine has become because it has gotten out of hand due to the West interfering. Putin is also demonized for the sake of Russian interventionism.

EN_UA_016466.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

Several paragraphs suggest that if NATO continues to be a threat to Russia, the consequences will be the expansion of the War in Ukraine to other states, the potential use of atomic weapons. Western countries are depicted as the aggressors as well as morally decadent.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Threat from the Kremlin’s Foolish, Never-ending, “limited military operation” in Ukraine continues to Rise Putin’s unwillingness to use sufficient force to end a conflict that should not have lasted one week is leading to much wider war. NATO at the summit in Vilnius is likely to approve plans to increase the number of troops in a state of high alert to 300,000, as well as other changes in the military structure, said Secretary General Stoltenberg. Plans to increase the number of its rapid reaction forces to more than 300 thousand. people from 40,000. Stoltenberg said in June 2022. He noted that this will take place within the framework of the implementation of new regional plans. In May, Stoltenberg said that these plans would be described as a bloc to deter and protect NATO allies from any aggression: they contain precise demands for the transformation of the armed forces, including their deployment. The Secretary General also announced more Allied exercises, bringing more forces into combat readiness, strengthening the command structure and control in the alliance. As reported in March, the increase in the number of the military may imply the emergence of two echelons. The first will be 100,000. soldiers ready to be sent within ten days. The second echelon is reinforcements, that is, the military sent for support, they will have to be ready for the transfer within 10-30 days. The Spanish El Pais reported in May that the bloc was finalizing a common strategy to counter the threat from Russia and terrorism. This strategy, according to sources of the publication, is changing NATO’s approaches to deploying forces in different regions and responding to threats from Moscow. Подробнее на РБК: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/06/2023/6489e6f39a794778d61881b4 The picture of widening war is beginning to form: Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states Karaganov’s description of the Western World as “anti-human ideologies: the denial of family, homeland, history, love between men and women, faith, service to higher ideals, everything that is human,” shows a rising realization that Russia sees itself confronted by a Satanic force that must be destroyed. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text suggest that war is expanding to other states and NATO's military power will eventually be challenged by Russia

EN_UA_016466.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

Several paragraphs suggest that if NATO continues to be a threat to Russia, the consequences will be the expansion of the War in Ukraine to other states, the potential use of atomic weapons. Western countries are depicted as the aggressors as well as morally decadent.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Threat from the Kremlin’s Foolish, Never-ending, “limited military operation” in Ukraine continues to Rise Putin’s unwillingness to use sufficient force to end a conflict that should not have lasted one week is leading to much wider war. NATO at the summit in Vilnius is likely to approve plans to increase the number of troops in a state of high alert to 300,000, as well as other changes in the military structure, said Secretary General Stoltenberg. Plans to increase the number of its rapid reaction forces to more than 300 thousand. people from 40,000. Stoltenberg said in June 2022. He noted that this will take place within the framework of the implementation of new regional plans. In May, Stoltenberg said that these plans would be described as a bloc to deter and protect NATO allies from any aggression: they contain precise demands for the transformation of the armed forces, including their deployment. The Secretary General also announced more Allied exercises, bringing more forces into combat readiness, strengthening the command structure and control in the alliance. As reported in March, the increase in the number of the military may imply the emergence of two echelons. The first will be 100,000. soldiers ready to be sent within ten days. The second echelon is reinforcements, that is, the military sent for support, they will have to be ready for the transfer within 10-30 days. The Spanish El Pais reported in May that the bloc was finalizing a common strategy to counter the threat from Russia and terrorism. This strategy, according to sources of the publication, is changing NATO’s approaches to deploying forces in different regions and responding to threats from Moscow. Подробнее на РБК: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/06/2023/6489e6f39a794778d61881b4 The picture of widening war is beginning to form: Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states Karaganov’s description of the Western World as “anti-human ideologies: the denial of family, homeland, history, love between men and women, faith, service to higher ideals, everything that is human,” shows a rising realization that Russia sees itself confronted by a Satanic force that must be destroyed. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article presents several passages amplifying the fears of an upcoming NATO attack against Russia

EN_UA_016466.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

Several paragraphs suggest that if NATO continues to be a threat to Russia, the consequences will be the expansion of the War in Ukraine to other states, the potential use of atomic weapons. Western countries are depicted as the aggressors as well as morally decadent.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Threat from the Kremlin’s Foolish, Never-ending, “limited military operation” in Ukraine continues to Rise Putin’s unwillingness to use sufficient force to end a conflict that should not have lasted one week is leading to much wider war. NATO at the summit in Vilnius is likely to approve plans to increase the number of troops in a state of high alert to 300,000, as well as other changes in the military structure, said Secretary General Stoltenberg. Plans to increase the number of its rapid reaction forces to more than 300 thousand. people from 40,000. Stoltenberg said in June 2022. He noted that this will take place within the framework of the implementation of new regional plans. In May, Stoltenberg said that these plans would be described as a bloc to deter and protect NATO allies from any aggression: they contain precise demands for the transformation of the armed forces, including their deployment. The Secretary General also announced more Allied exercises, bringing more forces into combat readiness, strengthening the command structure and control in the alliance. As reported in March, the increase in the number of the military may imply the emergence of two echelons. The first will be 100,000. soldiers ready to be sent within ten days. The second echelon is reinforcements, that is, the military sent for support, they will have to be ready for the transfer within 10-30 days. The Spanish El Pais reported in May that the bloc was finalizing a common strategy to counter the threat from Russia and terrorism. This strategy, according to sources of the publication, is changing NATO’s approaches to deploying forces in different regions and responding to threats from Moscow. Подробнее на РБК: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/06/2023/6489e6f39a794778d61881b4 The picture of widening war is beginning to form: Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states Karaganov’s description of the Western World as “anti-human ideologies: the denial of family, homeland, history, love between men and women, faith, service to higher ideals, everything that is human,” shows a rising realization that Russia sees itself confronted by a Satanic force that must be destroyed. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs, the text presents quotes and arguments which aim to exacerbate the fears of a possible use of nuclear weapons by Russian forces, fostering the idea that the war in Ukraine might soon escalate to other countries

EN_UA_016466.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

Several paragraphs suggest that if NATO continues to be a threat to Russia, the consequences will be the expansion of the War in Ukraine to other states, the potential use of atomic weapons. Western countries are depicted as the aggressors as well as morally decadent.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> The Threat from the Kremlin’s Foolish, Never-ending, “limited military operation” in Ukraine continues to Rise Putin’s unwillingness to use sufficient force to end a conflict that should not have lasted one week is leading to much wider war. NATO at the summit in Vilnius is likely to approve plans to increase the number of troops in a state of high alert to 300,000, as well as other changes in the military structure, said Secretary General Stoltenberg. Plans to increase the number of its rapid reaction forces to more than 300 thousand. people from 40,000. Stoltenberg said in June 2022. He noted that this will take place within the framework of the implementation of new regional plans. In May, Stoltenberg said that these plans would be described as a bloc to deter and protect NATO allies from any aggression: they contain precise demands for the transformation of the armed forces, including their deployment. The Secretary General also announced more Allied exercises, bringing more forces into combat readiness, strengthening the command structure and control in the alliance. As reported in March, the increase in the number of the military may imply the emergence of two echelons. The first will be 100,000. soldiers ready to be sent within ten days. The second echelon is reinforcements, that is, the military sent for support, they will have to be ready for the transfer within 10-30 days. The Spanish El Pais reported in May that the bloc was finalizing a common strategy to counter the threat from Russia and terrorism. This strategy, according to sources of the publication, is changing NATO’s approaches to deploying forces in different regions and responding to threats from Moscow. Подробнее на РБК: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/06/2023/6489e6f39a794778d61881b4 The picture of widening war is beginning to form: Professor Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states Karaganov’s description of the Western World as “anti-human ideologies: the denial of family, homeland, history, love between men and women, faith, service to higher ideals, everything that is human,” shows a rising realization that Russia sees itself confronted by a Satanic force that must be destroyed. </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine as inevitable. Western allies are considered responsible, especially the US

EN_UA_016466.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

none

Several paragraphs suggest that if NATO continues to be a threat to Russia, the consequences will be the expansion of the War in Ukraine to other states, the potential use of atomic weapons. Western countries are depicted as the aggressors as well as morally decadent.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims By Magyar Nemzet of Remix News A Russian general is claiming that NATO troops are in Ukraine, but they are being disguised as mercenaries to justify their presence, with a number of American and Polish bodies found in Avdiivka, the city recently captured by Russian forces over the last few days. In an interview with Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, General Sergei Rudskoy, chief operations director of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said that NATO military personnel are taking part in the fighting in Ukraine disguised as mercenaries. “NATO soldiers are taking part in the fighting disguised as mercenaries. They control air defense systems for operational and tactical missiles and multiple rocket launchers, and are part of assault teams,” Rudskoy said. According to him, NATO officers directly shape the military operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The Russian state news agency TASS reported that the bodies of soldiers with Polish and American insignia on their clothes had been found in the Russian-controlled Avdiivka. “The clearing of Avdiivka has revealed quite a few interesting details. In this case, bodies abandoned by Ukrainian armed units with American and Polish insignia sewn on their uniforms,” Igor Kimakovsky, an adviser to the head of the “Donetsk People’s Republic,” told Russia’s TASS/TRANS news agency. This information cannot be independently verified. Gen. Rudskoy claims that Ukraine is being used as a proxy against Russia. “Western countries make no secret of their desire to inflict a strategic defeat on our country. In order to achieve this goal, Washington and Brussels have chosen Ukraine, where anti-Russian, nationalist sentiment has been nurtured since the collapse of the Soviet Union. At present, the Ukrainian people are being used by the United States as cannon fodder for its geopolitical ambitions of world domination. Therefore, the threats to our country today are no less serious than in the years of 1941-1945 last century,” said Gen. Rudskoy. With the fall of Avdiivka, Ukraine has lost one of the most important cities on the Donetsk frontline, Many believe that the town is now serving as a second Bakhmut, as it was clear months ago that it could only be held temporarily at the cost of tens of thousands of soldiers’ lives. Continue reading here at Remix </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout several paragraphs the text conveys a narrative suggesting that NATO troops are in Ukraine. According to the text, this would confirm Russia's allegation that Ukraine is nothing more than a proxy for the West's interest.

EN_UA_023816.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West

By quoting several Russian officials, the text adopts a Russian view of Ukraine's battlefield situation, claiming that it is Western personel and equipment that fight in Ukraine. The text adopts an overall view that the West has used Ukraine to inflict damage on Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims By Magyar Nemzet of Remix News A Russian general is claiming that NATO troops are in Ukraine, but they are being disguised as mercenaries to justify their presence, with a number of American and Polish bodies found in Avdiivka, the city recently captured by Russian forces over the last few days. In an interview with Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, General Sergei Rudskoy, chief operations director of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said that NATO military personnel are taking part in the fighting in Ukraine disguised as mercenaries. “NATO soldiers are taking part in the fighting disguised as mercenaries. They control air defense systems for operational and tactical missiles and multiple rocket launchers, and are part of assault teams,” Rudskoy said. According to him, NATO officers directly shape the military operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The Russian state news agency TASS reported that the bodies of soldiers with Polish and American insignia on their clothes had been found in the Russian-controlled Avdiivka. “The clearing of Avdiivka has revealed quite a few interesting details. In this case, bodies abandoned by Ukrainian armed units with American and Polish insignia sewn on their uniforms,” Igor Kimakovsky, an adviser to the head of the “Donetsk People’s Republic,” told Russia’s TASS/TRANS news agency. This information cannot be independently verified. Gen. Rudskoy claims that Ukraine is being used as a proxy against Russia. “Western countries make no secret of their desire to inflict a strategic defeat on our country. In order to achieve this goal, Washington and Brussels have chosen Ukraine, where anti-Russian, nationalist sentiment has been nurtured since the collapse of the Soviet Union. At present, the Ukrainian people are being used by the United States as cannon fodder for its geopolitical ambitions of world domination. Therefore, the threats to our country today are no less serious than in the years of 1941-1945 last century,” said Gen. Rudskoy. With the fall of Avdiivka, Ukraine has lost one of the most important cities on the Donetsk frontline, Many believe that the town is now serving as a second Bakhmut, as it was clear months ago that it could only be held temporarily at the cost of tens of thousands of soldiers’ lives. Continue reading here at Remix </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text talks several times about NATO troops in Ukraine and how Ukraine is a puppet of the West. It talks about the military situation in Ukraine but in order to do so it discredits Ukraine as being used by the West and not fighting for its people.

EN_UA_023816.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West

By quoting several Russian officials, the text adopts a Russian view of Ukraine's battlefield situation, claiming that it is Western personel and equipment that fight in Ukraine. The text adopts an overall view that the West has used Ukraine to inflict damage on Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims By Magyar Nemzet of Remix News A Russian general is claiming that NATO troops are in Ukraine, but they are being disguised as mercenaries to justify their presence, with a number of American and Polish bodies found in Avdiivka, the city recently captured by Russian forces over the last few days. In an interview with Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, General Sergei Rudskoy, chief operations director of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said that NATO military personnel are taking part in the fighting in Ukraine disguised as mercenaries. “NATO soldiers are taking part in the fighting disguised as mercenaries. They control air defense systems for operational and tactical missiles and multiple rocket launchers, and are part of assault teams,” Rudskoy said. According to him, NATO officers directly shape the military operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The Russian state news agency TASS reported that the bodies of soldiers with Polish and American insignia on their clothes had been found in the Russian-controlled Avdiivka. “The clearing of Avdiivka has revealed quite a few interesting details. In this case, bodies abandoned by Ukrainian armed units with American and Polish insignia sewn on their uniforms,” Igor Kimakovsky, an adviser to the head of the “Donetsk People’s Republic,” told Russia’s TASS/TRANS news agency. This information cannot be independently verified. Gen. Rudskoy claims that Ukraine is being used as a proxy against Russia. “Western countries make no secret of their desire to inflict a strategic defeat on our country. In order to achieve this goal, Washington and Brussels have chosen Ukraine, where anti-Russian, nationalist sentiment has been nurtured since the collapse of the Soviet Union. At present, the Ukrainian people are being used by the United States as cannon fodder for its geopolitical ambitions of world domination. Therefore, the threats to our country today are no less serious than in the years of 1941-1945 last century,” said Gen. Rudskoy. With the fall of Avdiivka, Ukraine has lost one of the most important cities on the Donetsk frontline, Many believe that the town is now serving as a second Bakhmut, as it was clear months ago that it could only be held temporarily at the cost of tens of thousands of soldiers’ lives. Continue reading here at Remix </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text repeatedly presents quotes discrediting Ukraine. Among others, Ukraine is described as a proxy for Western powers and Western troops directly participate in the conflict

EN_UA_023816.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West

By quoting several Russian officials, the text adopts a Russian view of Ukraine's battlefield situation, claiming that it is Western personel and equipment that fight in Ukraine. The text adopts an overall view that the West has used Ukraine to inflict damage on Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims By Magyar Nemzet of Remix News A Russian general is claiming that NATO troops are in Ukraine, but they are being disguised as mercenaries to justify their presence, with a number of American and Polish bodies found in Avdiivka, the city recently captured by Russian forces over the last few days. In an interview with Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, General Sergei Rudskoy, chief operations director of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said that NATO military personnel are taking part in the fighting in Ukraine disguised as mercenaries. “NATO soldiers are taking part in the fighting disguised as mercenaries. They control air defense systems for operational and tactical missiles and multiple rocket launchers, and are part of assault teams,” Rudskoy said. According to him, NATO officers directly shape the military operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The Russian state news agency TASS reported that the bodies of soldiers with Polish and American insignia on their clothes had been found in the Russian-controlled Avdiivka. “The clearing of Avdiivka has revealed quite a few interesting details. In this case, bodies abandoned by Ukrainian armed units with American and Polish insignia sewn on their uniforms,” Igor Kimakovsky, an adviser to the head of the “Donetsk People’s Republic,” told Russia’s TASS/TRANS news agency. This information cannot be independently verified. Gen. Rudskoy claims that Ukraine is being used as a proxy against Russia. “Western countries make no secret of their desire to inflict a strategic defeat on our country. In order to achieve this goal, Washington and Brussels have chosen Ukraine, where anti-Russian, nationalist sentiment has been nurtured since the collapse of the Soviet Union. At present, the Ukrainian people are being used by the United States as cannon fodder for its geopolitical ambitions of world domination. Therefore, the threats to our country today are no less serious than in the years of 1941-1945 last century,” said Gen. Rudskoy. With the fall of Avdiivka, Ukraine has lost one of the most important cities on the Donetsk frontline, Many believe that the town is now serving as a second Bakhmut, as it was clear months ago that it could only be held temporarily at the cost of tens of thousands of soldiers’ lives. Continue reading here at Remix </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Throughout the whole text, several paragraphs attempt to discredit Ukraine by claiming it's only the proxy of the West and the Ukrainian people is used as a foddern to satisfy the West's geopolitical ambitions

EN_UA_023816.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West

By quoting several Russian officials, the text adopts a Russian view of Ukraine's battlefield situation, claiming that it is Western personel and equipment that fight in Ukraine. The text adopts an overall view that the West has used Ukraine to inflict damage on Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims NATO Troops Are Operating In Ukraine Disguised As Mercenaries, Russian General Claims By Magyar Nemzet of Remix News A Russian general is claiming that NATO troops are in Ukraine, but they are being disguised as mercenaries to justify their presence, with a number of American and Polish bodies found in Avdiivka, the city recently captured by Russian forces over the last few days. In an interview with Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, General Sergei Rudskoy, chief operations director of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, said that NATO military personnel are taking part in the fighting in Ukraine disguised as mercenaries. “NATO soldiers are taking part in the fighting disguised as mercenaries. They control air defense systems for operational and tactical missiles and multiple rocket launchers, and are part of assault teams,” Rudskoy said. According to him, NATO officers directly shape the military operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The Russian state news agency TASS reported that the bodies of soldiers with Polish and American insignia on their clothes had been found in the Russian-controlled Avdiivka. “The clearing of Avdiivka has revealed quite a few interesting details. In this case, bodies abandoned by Ukrainian armed units with American and Polish insignia sewn on their uniforms,” Igor Kimakovsky, an adviser to the head of the “Donetsk People’s Republic,” told Russia’s TASS/TRANS news agency. This information cannot be independently verified. Gen. Rudskoy claims that Ukraine is being used as a proxy against Russia. “Western countries make no secret of their desire to inflict a strategic defeat on our country. In order to achieve this goal, Washington and Brussels have chosen Ukraine, where anti-Russian, nationalist sentiment has been nurtured since the collapse of the Soviet Union. At present, the Ukrainian people are being used by the United States as cannon fodder for its geopolitical ambitions of world domination. Therefore, the threats to our country today are no less serious than in the years of 1941-1945 last century,” said Gen. Rudskoy. With the fall of Avdiivka, Ukraine has lost one of the most important cities on the Donetsk frontline, Many believe that the town is now serving as a second Bakhmut, as it was clear months ago that it could only be held temporarily at the cost of tens of thousands of soldiers’ lives. Continue reading here at Remix </document> <category> URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs suggest that Ukraine is merely a puppet of the West. According to the article, Ukrainian soldiers would not be able to hold territories for a long time without the support of Western allies, but the US are using Ukraine as a proxy

EN_UA_023816.txt

URW: Discrediting Ukraine

URW: Discrediting Ukraine: Ukraine is a puppet of the West

By quoting several Russian officials, the text adopts a Russian view of Ukraine's battlefield situation, claiming that it is Western personel and equipment that fight in Ukraine. The text adopts an overall view that the West has used Ukraine to inflict damage on Russia.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Make no mistake – the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. They goaded Russia into it deliberately, then abandoned Ukraine for all intents and purposes. It’s part of their plan to bring the entire world down so they can build it up again in their image. Russia is going to attack the USA. Again, this is what the West wants. The entire show fits in with their demonic vaccination operation. The Russian attack will finish what the vaccinations and the sanctions started This is the work of mad people. This is the work of Satan. The West represents human civilization at its peak. And war is part of the plan to reverse that. Putin has stated that being cut off from Swift is equivalent to a nuclear attack. The consequence of which must entail a retaliatory nuclear attack. That is the conclusion we must read into that statement. Part of the reason for attacking Ukraine was to get rid of the nazis and junkies. The USA is the symbolic embodiment of both. The problem for Russia is the Antichrist not Biden. He it is who is behind the vaccinations, degeneracy, economic implosion, religious sellout and finally nuclear war. If I am aware of him I’m sure, as Prince Charles of England has hinted, others are aware of him as well. Not sure but I believe most Western leaders are as well, having signed up to the genocide via voluntary injection. His next objective is mandatory injection and for that they need sprawling camp detentions everywhere. Once detained these people will be subjected to torture then killed as they do not fit into their plans. Western leaders have already fallen and unless they are forcefully replaced by the popular vote they are the central core of the satanic plan unfolding like clockwork. However by taking out the USA, the rest of Europe will fold to Putin and the tough threats will not be ignored and the Antichrist will be defeated. America will still survive but it will be freed from demonic entrapment with the intent to enslavement. It will again become a light to the world for the Statue of Liberty was and always will be a symbol of that light. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. the statue of liberty ..a useless pile of fictitious junk.. not much in the way of freedom anymore …amerika (west)representing the peak of human achievement .. we have been going rapidly backward since the sixties .. the peak was over decades ago The statue of Liberty… the only liberty that monstrosity represents is that of the LBGTQ abortionists. One thing is becoming pretty clear… the USA needs to do some house-cleaning and smartish. Every time you turn over a rock there are the US intelligence agency’s and their proxies. </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article claims that Western leaders are complicit in the murder of their citizens through the introduction of dangerous vaccines and allowing Ukraine war. These leaders would be replaced through popular vote. Russia will attack the USA to take them down and save the world.

EN_UA_101805.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The text presents multiple paragraphs spreading conspiracy theories involving satanic plans, Ukraine, and vaccinations. The West and the US are accused of favoring this plan

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Make no mistake – the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. They goaded Russia into it deliberately, then abandoned Ukraine for all intents and purposes. It’s part of their plan to bring the entire world down so they can build it up again in their image. Russia is going to attack the USA. Again, this is what the West wants. The entire show fits in with their demonic vaccination operation. The Russian attack will finish what the vaccinations and the sanctions started This is the work of mad people. This is the work of Satan. The West represents human civilization at its peak. And war is part of the plan to reverse that. Putin has stated that being cut off from Swift is equivalent to a nuclear attack. The consequence of which must entail a retaliatory nuclear attack. That is the conclusion we must read into that statement. Part of the reason for attacking Ukraine was to get rid of the nazis and junkies. The USA is the symbolic embodiment of both. The problem for Russia is the Antichrist not Biden. He it is who is behind the vaccinations, degeneracy, economic implosion, religious sellout and finally nuclear war. If I am aware of him I’m sure, as Prince Charles of England has hinted, others are aware of him as well. Not sure but I believe most Western leaders are as well, having signed up to the genocide via voluntary injection. His next objective is mandatory injection and for that they need sprawling camp detentions everywhere. Once detained these people will be subjected to torture then killed as they do not fit into their plans. Western leaders have already fallen and unless they are forcefully replaced by the popular vote they are the central core of the satanic plan unfolding like clockwork. However by taking out the USA, the rest of Europe will fold to Putin and the tough threats will not be ignored and the Antichrist will be defeated. America will still survive but it will be freed from demonic entrapment with the intent to enslavement. It will again become a light to the world for the Statue of Liberty was and always will be a symbol of that light. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. the statue of liberty ..a useless pile of fictitious junk.. not much in the way of freedom anymore …amerika (west)representing the peak of human achievement .. we have been going rapidly backward since the sixties .. the peak was over decades ago The statue of Liberty… the only liberty that monstrosity represents is that of the LBGTQ abortionists. One thing is becoming pretty clear… the USA needs to do some house-cleaning and smartish. Every time you turn over a rock there are the US intelligence agency’s and their proxies. </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticise Western countries, especially the USA, suggesting the declination of human civilization as well as attack on human values. The US are blamed as the main culprit, promoting LGBT movements, degeneracy as well as being the main hub of the Antichrist and of the Illuminati.

EN_UA_101805.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The text presents multiple paragraphs spreading conspiracy theories involving satanic plans, Ukraine, and vaccinations. The West and the US are accused of favoring this plan

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Make no mistake – the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. They goaded Russia into it deliberately, then abandoned Ukraine for all intents and purposes. It’s part of their plan to bring the entire world down so they can build it up again in their image. Russia is going to attack the USA. Again, this is what the West wants. The entire show fits in with their demonic vaccination operation. The Russian attack will finish what the vaccinations and the sanctions started This is the work of mad people. This is the work of Satan. The West represents human civilization at its peak. And war is part of the plan to reverse that. Putin has stated that being cut off from Swift is equivalent to a nuclear attack. The consequence of which must entail a retaliatory nuclear attack. That is the conclusion we must read into that statement. Part of the reason for attacking Ukraine was to get rid of the nazis and junkies. The USA is the symbolic embodiment of both. The problem for Russia is the Antichrist not Biden. He it is who is behind the vaccinations, degeneracy, economic implosion, religious sellout and finally nuclear war. If I am aware of him I’m sure, as Prince Charles of England has hinted, others are aware of him as well. Not sure but I believe most Western leaders are as well, having signed up to the genocide via voluntary injection. His next objective is mandatory injection and for that they need sprawling camp detentions everywhere. Once detained these people will be subjected to torture then killed as they do not fit into their plans. Western leaders have already fallen and unless they are forcefully replaced by the popular vote they are the central core of the satanic plan unfolding like clockwork. However by taking out the USA, the rest of Europe will fold to Putin and the tough threats will not be ignored and the Antichrist will be defeated. America will still survive but it will be freed from demonic entrapment with the intent to enslavement. It will again become a light to the world for the Statue of Liberty was and always will be a symbol of that light. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. the statue of liberty ..a useless pile of fictitious junk.. not much in the way of freedom anymore …amerika (west)representing the peak of human achievement .. we have been going rapidly backward since the sixties .. the peak was over decades ago The statue of Liberty… the only liberty that monstrosity represents is that of the LBGTQ abortionists. One thing is becoming pretty clear… the USA needs to do some house-cleaning and smartish. Every time you turn over a rock there are the US intelligence agency’s and their proxies. </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text suggests that the USA has been planning the attack of Ukraine from the very beginning. It also suggests that the US represents human civilization at its peak, which is however about to be reversed due to the Russian attack.

EN_UA_101805.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The text presents multiple paragraphs spreading conspiracy theories involving satanic plans, Ukraine, and vaccinations. The West and the US are accused of favoring this plan

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Make no mistake – the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. They goaded Russia into it deliberately, then abandoned Ukraine for all intents and purposes. It’s part of their plan to bring the entire world down so they can build it up again in their image. Russia is going to attack the USA. Again, this is what the West wants. The entire show fits in with their demonic vaccination operation. The Russian attack will finish what the vaccinations and the sanctions started This is the work of mad people. This is the work of Satan. The West represents human civilization at its peak. And war is part of the plan to reverse that. Putin has stated that being cut off from Swift is equivalent to a nuclear attack. The consequence of which must entail a retaliatory nuclear attack. That is the conclusion we must read into that statement. Part of the reason for attacking Ukraine was to get rid of the nazis and junkies. The USA is the symbolic embodiment of both. The problem for Russia is the Antichrist not Biden. He it is who is behind the vaccinations, degeneracy, economic implosion, religious sellout and finally nuclear war. If I am aware of him I’m sure, as Prince Charles of England has hinted, others are aware of him as well. Not sure but I believe most Western leaders are as well, having signed up to the genocide via voluntary injection. His next objective is mandatory injection and for that they need sprawling camp detentions everywhere. Once detained these people will be subjected to torture then killed as they do not fit into their plans. Western leaders have already fallen and unless they are forcefully replaced by the popular vote they are the central core of the satanic plan unfolding like clockwork. However by taking out the USA, the rest of Europe will fold to Putin and the tough threats will not be ignored and the Antichrist will be defeated. America will still survive but it will be freed from demonic entrapment with the intent to enslavement. It will again become a light to the world for the Statue of Liberty was and always will be a symbol of that light. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. the statue of liberty ..a useless pile of fictitious junk.. not much in the way of freedom anymore …amerika (west)representing the peak of human achievement .. we have been going rapidly backward since the sixties .. the peak was over decades ago The statue of Liberty… the only liberty that monstrosity represents is that of the LBGTQ abortionists. One thing is becoming pretty clear… the USA needs to do some house-cleaning and smartish. Every time you turn over a rock there are the US intelligence agency’s and their proxies. </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative according to which the US is controlled by secret schemes of powerful groups which aim at controlling and ultimately reducing the population through vaccination, but also through the war in Ukraine. The war in Ukraine is considered an attempt to eliminate the USA and Western world as it represents the peak of human achievement

EN_UA_101805.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The text presents multiple paragraphs spreading conspiracy theories involving satanic plans, Ukraine, and vaccinations. The West and the US are accused of favoring this plan

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Make no mistake – the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. Make no mistake - the West wanted Russia to invade the Ukraine. They goaded Russia into it deliberately, then abandoned Ukraine for all intents and purposes. It’s part of their plan to bring the entire world down so they can build it up again in their image. Russia is going to attack the USA. Again, this is what the West wants. The entire show fits in with their demonic vaccination operation. The Russian attack will finish what the vaccinations and the sanctions started This is the work of mad people. This is the work of Satan. The West represents human civilization at its peak. And war is part of the plan to reverse that. Putin has stated that being cut off from Swift is equivalent to a nuclear attack. The consequence of which must entail a retaliatory nuclear attack. That is the conclusion we must read into that statement. Part of the reason for attacking Ukraine was to get rid of the nazis and junkies. The USA is the symbolic embodiment of both. The problem for Russia is the Antichrist not Biden. He it is who is behind the vaccinations, degeneracy, economic implosion, religious sellout and finally nuclear war. If I am aware of him I’m sure, as Prince Charles of England has hinted, others are aware of him as well. Not sure but I believe most Western leaders are as well, having signed up to the genocide via voluntary injection. His next objective is mandatory injection and for that they need sprawling camp detentions everywhere. Once detained these people will be subjected to torture then killed as they do not fit into their plans. Western leaders have already fallen and unless they are forcefully replaced by the popular vote they are the central core of the satanic plan unfolding like clockwork. However by taking out the USA, the rest of Europe will fold to Putin and the tough threats will not be ignored and the Antichrist will be defeated. America will still survive but it will be freed from demonic entrapment with the intent to enslavement. It will again become a light to the world for the Statue of Liberty was and always will be a symbol of that light. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends. Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below. Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because... It’s OXYGENATED It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH Preservative and Chemical Free Allergen Free Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons Is a Full Spectrum Complex Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials. Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link. the statue of liberty ..a useless pile of fictitious junk.. not much in the way of freedom anymore …amerika (west)representing the peak of human achievement .. we have been going rapidly backward since the sixties .. the peak was over decades ago The statue of Liberty… the only liberty that monstrosity represents is that of the LBGTQ abortionists. One thing is becoming pretty clear… the USA needs to do some house-cleaning and smartish. Every time you turn over a rock there are the US intelligence agency’s and their proxies. </document> <category> URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article depicts western allies of Ukraine as implementing a scheme to attack Russia, with the attack on Ukraine being just the first step of a larger plan. The argument is that behind the West there is a satanic force

EN_UA_101805.txt

URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups

none

The text presents multiple paragraphs spreading conspiracy theories involving satanic plans, Ukraine, and vaccinations. The West and the US are accused of favoring this plan

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pentagon plans to serve LAB-GROWN MEAT to troops in the name of climate change The Washington Free Beacon reported that BioMADE, a public-private partnership that has received more than $500 million from the DoD, is responsible for the endeavor. BioMADE announced on its website on June 3 that it is looking for new ideas to reduce the CO2 emissions from food production and transport at military sites. These ideas include "novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat or protein" – essentially a euphemism for lab-grown fake meat. Lab-grown meat is a new technology where animal muscle and fat tissues are grown from modified animal cells in special equipment. This process uses a mix of chemicals, pressure and temperature to create meat that resembles beef, chicken and pork. Though still in the experimental stage, lab-grown meat has sparked a debate about its efficiency and ethics of producing meat without killing animals. (Related: Lab-made chicken meat grown from CANCER CELLS receives FDA approval - Are you ready to eat TUMOR nuggets?) But according to a 2023 study by researchers at the University of California-Davis, the carbon footprint of lab-grown beef might be worse than that of the product it seeks to replace. It zoomed in on the use of highly refined or purified growth media, which is used to help animal cells multiply. They wrote that lab-grown meat using purified media in its production has a global warming potential four to 25 times greater than the average compared to the real thing. Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Speak freely without censorship at the new decentralized, blockchain-power Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions. Critics argue that using U.S. troops to test lab-grown meat, which is still experimental and not widely available in stores, is inappropriate. Although the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved two California companies to sell cultured chicken to restaurants in 2023, some believe taxpayer money shouldn’t fund the lab-grown meat industry. Jack Hubbard, executive director for the Center for the Environment and Welfare (CEW), was among the vocal critics of the plan. "Taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund the lab-grown meat sector," he remarked. "Our troops deserve better than to be served lab-grown meat, produced in bioreactors with immortalized cells and chemicals. Unfortunately, this effort is being driven by an agenda that is political and anti-farmer. Our soldiers should never be used as guinea pigs." Even Ethan Lane, vice president for government affairs at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has criticized the DoD research grant that bankrolled BioMADE. "It is outrageous that the DoD is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to feed our heroes like lab rats," he said in a statement. "This misguided research project is a giant slap in the face to everyone that has served our country. Our veterans and active-duty troops deserve so much better than this." "U.S. cattle producers raise the highest-quality beef in the world, with the lowest carbon footprint – and American troops deserve to be served that same wholesome, natural meat and not ultra-processed, lab-grown protein that is cooked up in a chemical-filled bioreactor." Watch this video about BioMADE's lab-grown meat for U.S. soldiers. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Florida bill BANNING lab-grown meat awaits Gov. DeSantis’ signature. The globalists are "coming for your food," experts warn - "plant-based" tyranny will rule the world. FDA approves lab-grown meat produced by Chinese firm linked to biowarfare program. Study: Vegan FAKE MEAT products linked to cardiovascular issues. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article reports about the US military feeding soldiers with lab grown meat. The article criticises the decision mentioning that there are not enough studies proving the safety of the method.

EN_CC_100000.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The text attacks the US government for the implementation of climate related-policies which would provide the so-called fake meat to the US military, underlining that promiment public figures are disagreeing with it.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pentagon plans to serve LAB-GROWN MEAT to troops in the name of climate change The Washington Free Beacon reported that BioMADE, a public-private partnership that has received more than $500 million from the DoD, is responsible for the endeavor. BioMADE announced on its website on June 3 that it is looking for new ideas to reduce the CO2 emissions from food production and transport at military sites. These ideas include "novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat or protein" – essentially a euphemism for lab-grown fake meat. Lab-grown meat is a new technology where animal muscle and fat tissues are grown from modified animal cells in special equipment. This process uses a mix of chemicals, pressure and temperature to create meat that resembles beef, chicken and pork. Though still in the experimental stage, lab-grown meat has sparked a debate about its efficiency and ethics of producing meat without killing animals. (Related: Lab-made chicken meat grown from CANCER CELLS receives FDA approval - Are you ready to eat TUMOR nuggets?) But according to a 2023 study by researchers at the University of California-Davis, the carbon footprint of lab-grown beef might be worse than that of the product it seeks to replace. It zoomed in on the use of highly refined or purified growth media, which is used to help animal cells multiply. They wrote that lab-grown meat using purified media in its production has a global warming potential four to 25 times greater than the average compared to the real thing. Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Speak freely without censorship at the new decentralized, blockchain-power Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions. Critics argue that using U.S. troops to test lab-grown meat, which is still experimental and not widely available in stores, is inappropriate. Although the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved two California companies to sell cultured chicken to restaurants in 2023, some believe taxpayer money shouldn’t fund the lab-grown meat industry. Jack Hubbard, executive director for the Center for the Environment and Welfare (CEW), was among the vocal critics of the plan. "Taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund the lab-grown meat sector," he remarked. "Our troops deserve better than to be served lab-grown meat, produced in bioreactors with immortalized cells and chemicals. Unfortunately, this effort is being driven by an agenda that is political and anti-farmer. Our soldiers should never be used as guinea pigs." Even Ethan Lane, vice president for government affairs at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has criticized the DoD research grant that bankrolled BioMADE. "It is outrageous that the DoD is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to feed our heroes like lab rats," he said in a statement. "This misguided research project is a giant slap in the face to everyone that has served our country. Our veterans and active-duty troops deserve so much better than this." "U.S. cattle producers raise the highest-quality beef in the world, with the lowest carbon footprint – and American troops deserve to be served that same wholesome, natural meat and not ultra-processed, lab-grown protein that is cooked up in a chemical-filled bioreactor." Watch this video about BioMADE's lab-grown meat for U.S. soldiers. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Florida bill BANNING lab-grown meat awaits Gov. DeSantis’ signature. The globalists are "coming for your food," experts warn - "plant-based" tyranny will rule the world. FDA approves lab-grown meat produced by Chinese firm linked to biowarfare program. Study: Vegan FAKE MEAT products linked to cardiovascular issues. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative highlighting alleged issues related to the implementation of green technologies in the US context. In doing so, the authors attempt to discredit both the US military as well as institutions such as the DoD and the FDA

EN_CC_100000.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The text attacks the US government for the implementation of climate related-policies which would provide the so-called fake meat to the US military, underlining that promiment public figures are disagreeing with it.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pentagon plans to serve LAB-GROWN MEAT to troops in the name of climate change The Washington Free Beacon reported that BioMADE, a public-private partnership that has received more than $500 million from the DoD, is responsible for the endeavor. BioMADE announced on its website on June 3 that it is looking for new ideas to reduce the CO2 emissions from food production and transport at military sites. These ideas include "novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat or protein" – essentially a euphemism for lab-grown fake meat. Lab-grown meat is a new technology where animal muscle and fat tissues are grown from modified animal cells in special equipment. This process uses a mix of chemicals, pressure and temperature to create meat that resembles beef, chicken and pork. Though still in the experimental stage, lab-grown meat has sparked a debate about its efficiency and ethics of producing meat without killing animals. (Related: Lab-made chicken meat grown from CANCER CELLS receives FDA approval - Are you ready to eat TUMOR nuggets?) But according to a 2023 study by researchers at the University of California-Davis, the carbon footprint of lab-grown beef might be worse than that of the product it seeks to replace. It zoomed in on the use of highly refined or purified growth media, which is used to help animal cells multiply. They wrote that lab-grown meat using purified media in its production has a global warming potential four to 25 times greater than the average compared to the real thing. Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Speak freely without censorship at the new decentralized, blockchain-power Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions. Critics argue that using U.S. troops to test lab-grown meat, which is still experimental and not widely available in stores, is inappropriate. Although the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved two California companies to sell cultured chicken to restaurants in 2023, some believe taxpayer money shouldn’t fund the lab-grown meat industry. Jack Hubbard, executive director for the Center for the Environment and Welfare (CEW), was among the vocal critics of the plan. "Taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund the lab-grown meat sector," he remarked. "Our troops deserve better than to be served lab-grown meat, produced in bioreactors with immortalized cells and chemicals. Unfortunately, this effort is being driven by an agenda that is political and anti-farmer. Our soldiers should never be used as guinea pigs." Even Ethan Lane, vice president for government affairs at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has criticized the DoD research grant that bankrolled BioMADE. "It is outrageous that the DoD is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to feed our heroes like lab rats," he said in a statement. "This misguided research project is a giant slap in the face to everyone that has served our country. Our veterans and active-duty troops deserve so much better than this." "U.S. cattle producers raise the highest-quality beef in the world, with the lowest carbon footprint – and American troops deserve to be served that same wholesome, natural meat and not ultra-processed, lab-grown protein that is cooked up in a chemical-filled bioreactor." Watch this video about BioMADE's lab-grown meat for U.S. soldiers. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Florida bill BANNING lab-grown meat awaits Gov. DeSantis’ signature. The globalists are "coming for your food," experts warn - "plant-based" tyranny will rule the world. FDA approves lab-grown meat produced by Chinese firm linked to biowarfare program. Study: Vegan FAKE MEAT products linked to cardiovascular issues. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text questions the use of lab grown meat for US soldiers because of its potential danger, ethics issues, as well as the use of tax payer's money for an unproven technology

EN_CC_100000.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The text attacks the US government for the implementation of climate related-policies which would provide the so-called fake meat to the US military, underlining that promiment public figures are disagreeing with it.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pentagon plans to serve LAB-GROWN MEAT to troops in the name of climate change The Washington Free Beacon reported that BioMADE, a public-private partnership that has received more than $500 million from the DoD, is responsible for the endeavor. BioMADE announced on its website on June 3 that it is looking for new ideas to reduce the CO2 emissions from food production and transport at military sites. These ideas include "novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat or protein" – essentially a euphemism for lab-grown fake meat. Lab-grown meat is a new technology where animal muscle and fat tissues are grown from modified animal cells in special equipment. This process uses a mix of chemicals, pressure and temperature to create meat that resembles beef, chicken and pork. Though still in the experimental stage, lab-grown meat has sparked a debate about its efficiency and ethics of producing meat without killing animals. (Related: Lab-made chicken meat grown from CANCER CELLS receives FDA approval - Are you ready to eat TUMOR nuggets?) But according to a 2023 study by researchers at the University of California-Davis, the carbon footprint of lab-grown beef might be worse than that of the product it seeks to replace. It zoomed in on the use of highly refined or purified growth media, which is used to help animal cells multiply. They wrote that lab-grown meat using purified media in its production has a global warming potential four to 25 times greater than the average compared to the real thing. Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Speak freely without censorship at the new decentralized, blockchain-power Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions. Critics argue that using U.S. troops to test lab-grown meat, which is still experimental and not widely available in stores, is inappropriate. Although the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved two California companies to sell cultured chicken to restaurants in 2023, some believe taxpayer money shouldn’t fund the lab-grown meat industry. Jack Hubbard, executive director for the Center for the Environment and Welfare (CEW), was among the vocal critics of the plan. "Taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund the lab-grown meat sector," he remarked. "Our troops deserve better than to be served lab-grown meat, produced in bioreactors with immortalized cells and chemicals. Unfortunately, this effort is being driven by an agenda that is political and anti-farmer. Our soldiers should never be used as guinea pigs." Even Ethan Lane, vice president for government affairs at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has criticized the DoD research grant that bankrolled BioMADE. "It is outrageous that the DoD is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to feed our heroes like lab rats," he said in a statement. "This misguided research project is a giant slap in the face to everyone that has served our country. Our veterans and active-duty troops deserve so much better than this." "U.S. cattle producers raise the highest-quality beef in the world, with the lowest carbon footprint – and American troops deserve to be served that same wholesome, natural meat and not ultra-processed, lab-grown protein that is cooked up in a chemical-filled bioreactor." Watch this video about BioMADE's lab-grown meat for U.S. soldiers. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Florida bill BANNING lab-grown meat awaits Gov. DeSantis’ signature. The globalists are "coming for your food," experts warn - "plant-based" tyranny will rule the world. FDA approves lab-grown meat produced by Chinese firm linked to biowarfare program. Study: Vegan FAKE MEAT products linked to cardiovascular issues. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article presenting alleged negative effects of using lab-grown meat. The author tries to discredti it by claiming it is being forced into US soldiers.

EN_CC_100000.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The text attacks the US government for the implementation of climate related-policies which would provide the so-called fake meat to the US military, underlining that promiment public figures are disagreeing with it.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Pentagon plans to serve LAB-GROWN MEAT to troops in the name of climate change The Washington Free Beacon reported that BioMADE, a public-private partnership that has received more than $500 million from the DoD, is responsible for the endeavor. BioMADE announced on its website on June 3 that it is looking for new ideas to reduce the CO2 emissions from food production and transport at military sites. These ideas include "novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat or protein" – essentially a euphemism for lab-grown fake meat. Lab-grown meat is a new technology where animal muscle and fat tissues are grown from modified animal cells in special equipment. This process uses a mix of chemicals, pressure and temperature to create meat that resembles beef, chicken and pork. Though still in the experimental stage, lab-grown meat has sparked a debate about its efficiency and ethics of producing meat without killing animals. (Related: Lab-made chicken meat grown from CANCER CELLS receives FDA approval - Are you ready to eat TUMOR nuggets?) But according to a 2023 study by researchers at the University of California-Davis, the carbon footprint of lab-grown beef might be worse than that of the product it seeks to replace. It zoomed in on the use of highly refined or purified growth media, which is used to help animal cells multiply. They wrote that lab-grown meat using purified media in its production has a global warming potential four to 25 times greater than the average compared to the real thing. Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Speak freely without censorship at the new decentralized, blockchain-power Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions. Critics argue that using U.S. troops to test lab-grown meat, which is still experimental and not widely available in stores, is inappropriate. Although the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved two California companies to sell cultured chicken to restaurants in 2023, some believe taxpayer money shouldn’t fund the lab-grown meat industry. Jack Hubbard, executive director for the Center for the Environment and Welfare (CEW), was among the vocal critics of the plan. "Taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund the lab-grown meat sector," he remarked. "Our troops deserve better than to be served lab-grown meat, produced in bioreactors with immortalized cells and chemicals. Unfortunately, this effort is being driven by an agenda that is political and anti-farmer. Our soldiers should never be used as guinea pigs." Even Ethan Lane, vice president for government affairs at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, has criticized the DoD research grant that bankrolled BioMADE. "It is outrageous that the DoD is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to feed our heroes like lab rats," he said in a statement. "This misguided research project is a giant slap in the face to everyone that has served our country. Our veterans and active-duty troops deserve so much better than this." "U.S. cattle producers raise the highest-quality beef in the world, with the lowest carbon footprint – and American troops deserve to be served that same wholesome, natural meat and not ultra-processed, lab-grown protein that is cooked up in a chemical-filled bioreactor." Watch this video about BioMADE's lab-grown meat for U.S. soldiers. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Florida bill BANNING lab-grown meat awaits Gov. DeSantis’ signature. The globalists are "coming for your food," experts warn - "plant-based" tyranny will rule the world. FDA approves lab-grown meat produced by Chinese firm linked to biowarfare program. Study: Vegan FAKE MEAT products linked to cardiovascular issues. </document> <category> CC: Controversy about green technologies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article discusses the controversy of serving lab grown meat to military personnel.

EN_CC_100000.txt

CC: Controversy about green technologies

none

The text attacks the US government for the implementation of climate related-policies which would provide the so-called fake meat to the US military, underlining that promiment public figures are disagreeing with it.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oppose imperialist War! SEP/IYSSE public meeting in Sri Lanka The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) in Sri Lanka are holding an online meeting entitled “Oppose imperialist war!” on Thursday, May 23, at 7pm. In announcing the recent International May Day Rally, David North, chairman of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site, warned, “A third world war is not a distant possibility. The opening stages of this war are already underway.” Israel’s genocide in Gaza against Palestinians and its US-backed attacks against Iran are just one front in a rapidly emerging world war involving nuclear armed powers. US imperialism and its allies are already engaged in a war against Russia in Ukraine and are making advanced preparations for a catastrophic conflict with China. The imperialist leaders as well as various media pundits now casually refer to a nuclear war as an acceptable strategic option, despite the grave threat it poses to the existence of humanity. The Biden administration, along with other NATO powers, have repeatedly crossed the “red lines” in Ukraine which they previously accepted as necessary to prevent nuclear war. One might consider that the imperialist leaders—Biden, Sunak, Macron and Scholz—are criminally insane as they drag the planet towards nuclear conflagration. However, their policies are not simply the product of deranged individuals but of the profound crisis of world capitalism for which they have no rational, progressive solution and see a global war for domination as the only way out. War is being accompanied by savage repression against any opposition as the terrible, continued persecution of Julian Assange for exposing the crimes of US imperialism graphically demonstrates. Our comrade Bogdan Syrotiuk of the Young Guard of Bolshevik Leninists has been detained by the fascistic Zelensky government in Ukraine earlier this month on false accusations of being a Russian agent. Bogdan has courageously opposed the war in Ukraine, along with his comrades in Russia, denounced both the Ukrainian and Russian regimes and fought for the unity of the Ukrainian and Russian working class. In the US and other imperialist countries, brutal police crackdowns are taking place against protesters opposing the Gaza genocide with thousands of arrests including of students. The ongoing anti-war protests in universities and cities are significant, but on their own are incapable of halting the bloodbath. For seven months, the Zionist regime and its imperialist backers have not only ignored protests by millions around the world, but they are also turning to police repression. The only social force capable of halting the drive to world war is the international working class which is coming into struggle in Sri Lanka and around the world in opposition to the austerity program of the ruling classes. As governments engage in, support and prepare for war, it is workers who are forced to bear the burden. A struggle against war requires the building of a unified anti-war movement of the working class based on a socialist program, exposing the futility of protest politics and all the apologists for imperialism. Appeals to capitalist governments are bankrupt. The independent mobilisation of workers on this basis needs to take up the fight to free Assange and Syrotiuk as well. The burning need is for a new revolutionary leadership in the working class based on socialist internationalism to abolish the source of militarism, austerity, authoritarianism and all sorts of social misery—the capitalist system. We invite you to participate in this important meeting. You can register for the online Zoom meeting using the link below. https://us04web.zoom.us/meeting/register/upYrfuGgrzovHdwsh0kw_cmGXQh_D1H27Gwi </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article aims to create fear within the readers that the situation of nuclear warfare is near. It repeatedly underlines the recklessness of the decision making process of Western allies which is leading to dangerous outcomes such as a possible nuclear confrontation

EN_UA_026142.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

The text conveys a sense of fear that nuclear war is imminent since Western countries are irresponsibly escalating conflicts to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oppose imperialist War! SEP/IYSSE public meeting in Sri Lanka The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) in Sri Lanka are holding an online meeting entitled “Oppose imperialist war!” on Thursday, May 23, at 7pm. In announcing the recent International May Day Rally, David North, chairman of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site, warned, “A third world war is not a distant possibility. The opening stages of this war are already underway.” Israel’s genocide in Gaza against Palestinians and its US-backed attacks against Iran are just one front in a rapidly emerging world war involving nuclear armed powers. US imperialism and its allies are already engaged in a war against Russia in Ukraine and are making advanced preparations for a catastrophic conflict with China. The imperialist leaders as well as various media pundits now casually refer to a nuclear war as an acceptable strategic option, despite the grave threat it poses to the existence of humanity. The Biden administration, along with other NATO powers, have repeatedly crossed the “red lines” in Ukraine which they previously accepted as necessary to prevent nuclear war. One might consider that the imperialist leaders—Biden, Sunak, Macron and Scholz—are criminally insane as they drag the planet towards nuclear conflagration. However, their policies are not simply the product of deranged individuals but of the profound crisis of world capitalism for which they have no rational, progressive solution and see a global war for domination as the only way out. War is being accompanied by savage repression against any opposition as the terrible, continued persecution of Julian Assange for exposing the crimes of US imperialism graphically demonstrates. Our comrade Bogdan Syrotiuk of the Young Guard of Bolshevik Leninists has been detained by the fascistic Zelensky government in Ukraine earlier this month on false accusations of being a Russian agent. Bogdan has courageously opposed the war in Ukraine, along with his comrades in Russia, denounced both the Ukrainian and Russian regimes and fought for the unity of the Ukrainian and Russian working class. In the US and other imperialist countries, brutal police crackdowns are taking place against protesters opposing the Gaza genocide with thousands of arrests including of students. The ongoing anti-war protests in universities and cities are significant, but on their own are incapable of halting the bloodbath. For seven months, the Zionist regime and its imperialist backers have not only ignored protests by millions around the world, but they are also turning to police repression. The only social force capable of halting the drive to world war is the international working class which is coming into struggle in Sri Lanka and around the world in opposition to the austerity program of the ruling classes. As governments engage in, support and prepare for war, it is workers who are forced to bear the burden. A struggle against war requires the building of a unified anti-war movement of the working class based on a socialist program, exposing the futility of protest politics and all the apologists for imperialism. Appeals to capitalist governments are bankrupt. The independent mobilisation of workers on this basis needs to take up the fight to free Assange and Syrotiuk as well. The burning need is for a new revolutionary leadership in the working class based on socialist internationalism to abolish the source of militarism, austerity, authoritarianism and all sorts of social misery—the capitalist system. We invite you to participate in this important meeting. You can register for the online Zoom meeting using the link below. https://us04web.zoom.us/meeting/register/upYrfuGgrzovHdwsh0kw_cmGXQh_D1H27Gwi </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text suggest several paragraphs depicting nuclear conflict as imminent due to the US/Western interventions in Ukraine, presenting it as a result of irrational policies of Western leaders which are endangering the whole humanity.

EN_UA_026142.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

The text conveys a sense of fear that nuclear war is imminent since Western countries are irresponsibly escalating conflicts to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oppose imperialist War! SEP/IYSSE public meeting in Sri Lanka The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) in Sri Lanka are holding an online meeting entitled “Oppose imperialist war!” on Thursday, May 23, at 7pm. In announcing the recent International May Day Rally, David North, chairman of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site, warned, “A third world war is not a distant possibility. The opening stages of this war are already underway.” Israel’s genocide in Gaza against Palestinians and its US-backed attacks against Iran are just one front in a rapidly emerging world war involving nuclear armed powers. US imperialism and its allies are already engaged in a war against Russia in Ukraine and are making advanced preparations for a catastrophic conflict with China. The imperialist leaders as well as various media pundits now casually refer to a nuclear war as an acceptable strategic option, despite the grave threat it poses to the existence of humanity. The Biden administration, along with other NATO powers, have repeatedly crossed the “red lines” in Ukraine which they previously accepted as necessary to prevent nuclear war. One might consider that the imperialist leaders—Biden, Sunak, Macron and Scholz—are criminally insane as they drag the planet towards nuclear conflagration. However, their policies are not simply the product of deranged individuals but of the profound crisis of world capitalism for which they have no rational, progressive solution and see a global war for domination as the only way out. War is being accompanied by savage repression against any opposition as the terrible, continued persecution of Julian Assange for exposing the crimes of US imperialism graphically demonstrates. Our comrade Bogdan Syrotiuk of the Young Guard of Bolshevik Leninists has been detained by the fascistic Zelensky government in Ukraine earlier this month on false accusations of being a Russian agent. Bogdan has courageously opposed the war in Ukraine, along with his comrades in Russia, denounced both the Ukrainian and Russian regimes and fought for the unity of the Ukrainian and Russian working class. In the US and other imperialist countries, brutal police crackdowns are taking place against protesters opposing the Gaza genocide with thousands of arrests including of students. The ongoing anti-war protests in universities and cities are significant, but on their own are incapable of halting the bloodbath. For seven months, the Zionist regime and its imperialist backers have not only ignored protests by millions around the world, but they are also turning to police repression. The only social force capable of halting the drive to world war is the international working class which is coming into struggle in Sri Lanka and around the world in opposition to the austerity program of the ruling classes. As governments engage in, support and prepare for war, it is workers who are forced to bear the burden. A struggle against war requires the building of a unified anti-war movement of the working class based on a socialist program, exposing the futility of protest politics and all the apologists for imperialism. Appeals to capitalist governments are bankrupt. The independent mobilisation of workers on this basis needs to take up the fight to free Assange and Syrotiuk as well. The burning need is for a new revolutionary leadership in the working class based on socialist internationalism to abolish the source of militarism, austerity, authoritarianism and all sorts of social misery—the capitalist system. We invite you to participate in this important meeting. You can register for the online Zoom meeting using the link below. https://us04web.zoom.us/meeting/register/upYrfuGgrzovHdwsh0kw_cmGXQh_D1H27Gwi </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs suggest the nuclear option is being considered by Western countries. It uses the declaration of responsible officials and journalists to alarmify the situation.

EN_UA_026142.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

The text conveys a sense of fear that nuclear war is imminent since Western countries are irresponsibly escalating conflicts to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oppose imperialist War! SEP/IYSSE public meeting in Sri Lanka The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) in Sri Lanka are holding an online meeting entitled “Oppose imperialist war!” on Thursday, May 23, at 7pm. In announcing the recent International May Day Rally, David North, chairman of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site, warned, “A third world war is not a distant possibility. The opening stages of this war are already underway.” Israel’s genocide in Gaza against Palestinians and its US-backed attacks against Iran are just one front in a rapidly emerging world war involving nuclear armed powers. US imperialism and its allies are already engaged in a war against Russia in Ukraine and are making advanced preparations for a catastrophic conflict with China. The imperialist leaders as well as various media pundits now casually refer to a nuclear war as an acceptable strategic option, despite the grave threat it poses to the existence of humanity. The Biden administration, along with other NATO powers, have repeatedly crossed the “red lines” in Ukraine which they previously accepted as necessary to prevent nuclear war. One might consider that the imperialist leaders—Biden, Sunak, Macron and Scholz—are criminally insane as they drag the planet towards nuclear conflagration. However, their policies are not simply the product of deranged individuals but of the profound crisis of world capitalism for which they have no rational, progressive solution and see a global war for domination as the only way out. War is being accompanied by savage repression against any opposition as the terrible, continued persecution of Julian Assange for exposing the crimes of US imperialism graphically demonstrates. Our comrade Bogdan Syrotiuk of the Young Guard of Bolshevik Leninists has been detained by the fascistic Zelensky government in Ukraine earlier this month on false accusations of being a Russian agent. Bogdan has courageously opposed the war in Ukraine, along with his comrades in Russia, denounced both the Ukrainian and Russian regimes and fought for the unity of the Ukrainian and Russian working class. In the US and other imperialist countries, brutal police crackdowns are taking place against protesters opposing the Gaza genocide with thousands of arrests including of students. The ongoing anti-war protests in universities and cities are significant, but on their own are incapable of halting the bloodbath. For seven months, the Zionist regime and its imperialist backers have not only ignored protests by millions around the world, but they are also turning to police repression. The only social force capable of halting the drive to world war is the international working class which is coming into struggle in Sri Lanka and around the world in opposition to the austerity program of the ruling classes. As governments engage in, support and prepare for war, it is workers who are forced to bear the burden. A struggle against war requires the building of a unified anti-war movement of the working class based on a socialist program, exposing the futility of protest politics and all the apologists for imperialism. Appeals to capitalist governments are bankrupt. The independent mobilisation of workers on this basis needs to take up the fight to free Assange and Syrotiuk as well. The burning need is for a new revolutionary leadership in the working class based on socialist internationalism to abolish the source of militarism, austerity, authoritarianism and all sorts of social misery—the capitalist system. We invite you to participate in this important meeting. You can register for the online Zoom meeting using the link below. https://us04web.zoom.us/meeting/register/upYrfuGgrzovHdwsh0kw_cmGXQh_D1H27Gwi </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs throughout the text highlight the potential use of atomic bombs both in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and in the broader context of the geopolitical tensions between Western countries and Russia and China

EN_UA_026142.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

The text conveys a sense of fear that nuclear war is imminent since Western countries are irresponsibly escalating conflicts to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> Oppose imperialist War! SEP/IYSSE public meeting in Sri Lanka The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE) in Sri Lanka are holding an online meeting entitled “Oppose imperialist war!” on Thursday, May 23, at 7pm. In announcing the recent International May Day Rally, David North, chairman of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site, warned, “A third world war is not a distant possibility. The opening stages of this war are already underway.” Israel’s genocide in Gaza against Palestinians and its US-backed attacks against Iran are just one front in a rapidly emerging world war involving nuclear armed powers. US imperialism and its allies are already engaged in a war against Russia in Ukraine and are making advanced preparations for a catastrophic conflict with China. The imperialist leaders as well as various media pundits now casually refer to a nuclear war as an acceptable strategic option, despite the grave threat it poses to the existence of humanity. The Biden administration, along with other NATO powers, have repeatedly crossed the “red lines” in Ukraine which they previously accepted as necessary to prevent nuclear war. One might consider that the imperialist leaders—Biden, Sunak, Macron and Scholz—are criminally insane as they drag the planet towards nuclear conflagration. However, their policies are not simply the product of deranged individuals but of the profound crisis of world capitalism for which they have no rational, progressive solution and see a global war for domination as the only way out. War is being accompanied by savage repression against any opposition as the terrible, continued persecution of Julian Assange for exposing the crimes of US imperialism graphically demonstrates. Our comrade Bogdan Syrotiuk of the Young Guard of Bolshevik Leninists has been detained by the fascistic Zelensky government in Ukraine earlier this month on false accusations of being a Russian agent. Bogdan has courageously opposed the war in Ukraine, along with his comrades in Russia, denounced both the Ukrainian and Russian regimes and fought for the unity of the Ukrainian and Russian working class. In the US and other imperialist countries, brutal police crackdowns are taking place against protesters opposing the Gaza genocide with thousands of arrests including of students. The ongoing anti-war protests in universities and cities are significant, but on their own are incapable of halting the bloodbath. For seven months, the Zionist regime and its imperialist backers have not only ignored protests by millions around the world, but they are also turning to police repression. The only social force capable of halting the drive to world war is the international working class which is coming into struggle in Sri Lanka and around the world in opposition to the austerity program of the ruling classes. As governments engage in, support and prepare for war, it is workers who are forced to bear the burden. A struggle against war requires the building of a unified anti-war movement of the working class based on a socialist program, exposing the futility of protest politics and all the apologists for imperialism. Appeals to capitalist governments are bankrupt. The independent mobilisation of workers on this basis needs to take up the fight to free Assange and Syrotiuk as well. The burning need is for a new revolutionary leadership in the working class based on socialist internationalism to abolish the source of militarism, austerity, authoritarianism and all sorts of social misery—the capitalist system. We invite you to participate in this important meeting. You can register for the online Zoom meeting using the link below. https://us04web.zoom.us/meeting/register/upYrfuGgrzovHdwsh0kw_cmGXQh_D1H27Gwi </document> <category> URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs attempt to depict the dangerous scenario of an eventual nuclear war with the US being the culprit, arguing that US foreign policy is insane since it involves attacking countries such as Iran and Russia which are nuclear armed powers

EN_UA_026142.txt

URW: Amplifying war-related fears

URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed

The text conveys a sense of fear that nuclear war is imminent since Western countries are irresponsibly escalating conflicts to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> These 8 States Plan On Banning Sale Of Gas-Powered Vehicles As Biden EPA Tackles ‘Climate Crisis’ Eight states — California, Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington — and the District of Columbia are now on board with plans to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles within the next decade. The plans to phase out the vehicles and switch to electric and hybrid vehicles come as the Biden administration continues to pursue its lofty climate goals in a struggling economy. The administration, for example, wants half of all new cars and trucks sold in 2030 to be zero-emission, despite sputtering EV sales. All 8 of the states and D.C. have adopted the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, and will have an outright ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles after 2035. California was the first to adopt the rule, aiming to have 35% of new vehicle sales emit zero emissions by 2026, and boosting that goal to 68% by 2030. According to the California Air Resources Board, the regulation overhauls the state’s “growing zero-emission vehicle market and robust motor vehicle emission control rules and augments them to meet more aggressive tailpipe emissions standards and ramp up to 100% zero-emission vehicles.” As noted by Money, the states’ plans to ban gas-powered vehicles have generally not required votes from lawmakers, but have been advanced with support from governors and environmental regulators. The EV market has struggled in recent months, as highlighted by The Daily Wire. Ford, for example, had to cut 1,400 employees from its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, rolled back the planned production number of the electric F-150 Lightnings in half, and slashed $12 billion in EV investments. President Biden, however, is not slowing down when it comes to targeting the gas-powered vehicle industry. Earlier this month, Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new eye-popping regulations in an effort to increase the number of electric vehicles on the road. The new EPA rules set emission standards for vehicles made between 2027 and 2032 and would eliminate more than 7 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, setting off concerns across the nation. For example, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) railed against the EPA’s move, calling it both “reckless” and “ill-informed.” “The federal government has no authority and no right to mandate what type of car or truck Americans can purchase for their everyday lives,” the senator said. “This reckless and ill-informed rule will impose what is effectively an EV mandate without ensuring the security of our supply chains from nations like China and without a realistic transition plan that addresses our domestic infrastructure needs.” </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article is about US states and cities wanting to ban the production and sale of vehicles that run on gas. This ban would be the consequence of an agreement that the US signed with other countries such as the UK to reduce the CO2 emissions.

EN_CC_200007.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

none

The text criticises climate policies about electric vehicles underlining the negative impact on the US economy. It argues that the market of EVs isn't big enough to substitute vehicles with combustion engines.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> These 8 States Plan On Banning Sale Of Gas-Powered Vehicles As Biden EPA Tackles ‘Climate Crisis’ Eight states — California, Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington — and the District of Columbia are now on board with plans to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles within the next decade. The plans to phase out the vehicles and switch to electric and hybrid vehicles come as the Biden administration continues to pursue its lofty climate goals in a struggling economy. The administration, for example, wants half of all new cars and trucks sold in 2030 to be zero-emission, despite sputtering EV sales. All 8 of the states and D.C. have adopted the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, and will have an outright ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles after 2035. California was the first to adopt the rule, aiming to have 35% of new vehicle sales emit zero emissions by 2026, and boosting that goal to 68% by 2030. According to the California Air Resources Board, the regulation overhauls the state’s “growing zero-emission vehicle market and robust motor vehicle emission control rules and augments them to meet more aggressive tailpipe emissions standards and ramp up to 100% zero-emission vehicles.” As noted by Money, the states’ plans to ban gas-powered vehicles have generally not required votes from lawmakers, but have been advanced with support from governors and environmental regulators. The EV market has struggled in recent months, as highlighted by The Daily Wire. Ford, for example, had to cut 1,400 employees from its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, rolled back the planned production number of the electric F-150 Lightnings in half, and slashed $12 billion in EV investments. President Biden, however, is not slowing down when it comes to targeting the gas-powered vehicle industry. Earlier this month, Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new eye-popping regulations in an effort to increase the number of electric vehicles on the road. The new EPA rules set emission standards for vehicles made between 2027 and 2032 and would eliminate more than 7 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, setting off concerns across the nation. For example, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) railed against the EPA’s move, calling it both “reckless” and “ill-informed.” “The federal government has no authority and no right to mandate what type of car or truck Americans can purchase for their everyday lives,” the senator said. “This reckless and ill-informed rule will impose what is effectively an EV mandate without ensuring the security of our supply chains from nations like China and without a realistic transition plan that addresses our domestic infrastructure needs.” </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several US states have planned to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles by 2035 and the Biden administration is targeting the auto industry, the article states. This would lead to the decline of American automobile industry.

EN_CC_200007.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

none

The text criticises climate policies about electric vehicles underlining the negative impact on the US economy. It argues that the market of EVs isn't big enough to substitute vehicles with combustion engines.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> These 8 States Plan On Banning Sale Of Gas-Powered Vehicles As Biden EPA Tackles ‘Climate Crisis’ Eight states — California, Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington — and the District of Columbia are now on board with plans to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles within the next decade. The plans to phase out the vehicles and switch to electric and hybrid vehicles come as the Biden administration continues to pursue its lofty climate goals in a struggling economy. The administration, for example, wants half of all new cars and trucks sold in 2030 to be zero-emission, despite sputtering EV sales. All 8 of the states and D.C. have adopted the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, and will have an outright ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles after 2035. California was the first to adopt the rule, aiming to have 35% of new vehicle sales emit zero emissions by 2026, and boosting that goal to 68% by 2030. According to the California Air Resources Board, the regulation overhauls the state’s “growing zero-emission vehicle market and robust motor vehicle emission control rules and augments them to meet more aggressive tailpipe emissions standards and ramp up to 100% zero-emission vehicles.” As noted by Money, the states’ plans to ban gas-powered vehicles have generally not required votes from lawmakers, but have been advanced with support from governors and environmental regulators. The EV market has struggled in recent months, as highlighted by The Daily Wire. Ford, for example, had to cut 1,400 employees from its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, rolled back the planned production number of the electric F-150 Lightnings in half, and slashed $12 billion in EV investments. President Biden, however, is not slowing down when it comes to targeting the gas-powered vehicle industry. Earlier this month, Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new eye-popping regulations in an effort to increase the number of electric vehicles on the road. The new EPA rules set emission standards for vehicles made between 2027 and 2032 and would eliminate more than 7 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, setting off concerns across the nation. For example, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) railed against the EPA’s move, calling it both “reckless” and “ill-informed.” “The federal government has no authority and no right to mandate what type of car or truck Americans can purchase for their everyday lives,” the senator said. “This reckless and ill-informed rule will impose what is effectively an EV mandate without ensuring the security of our supply chains from nations like China and without a realistic transition plan that addresses our domestic infrastructure needs.” </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks climate policies aimed at decarbonising the economy as being ineffective, too ambitious and relying on unreliable technology such as electric vehicles

EN_CC_200007.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

none

The text criticises climate policies about electric vehicles underlining the negative impact on the US economy. It argues that the market of EVs isn't big enough to substitute vehicles with combustion engines.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> These 8 States Plan On Banning Sale Of Gas-Powered Vehicles As Biden EPA Tackles ‘Climate Crisis’ Eight states — California, Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington — and the District of Columbia are now on board with plans to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles within the next decade. The plans to phase out the vehicles and switch to electric and hybrid vehicles come as the Biden administration continues to pursue its lofty climate goals in a struggling economy. The administration, for example, wants half of all new cars and trucks sold in 2030 to be zero-emission, despite sputtering EV sales. All 8 of the states and D.C. have adopted the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, and will have an outright ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles after 2035. California was the first to adopt the rule, aiming to have 35% of new vehicle sales emit zero emissions by 2026, and boosting that goal to 68% by 2030. According to the California Air Resources Board, the regulation overhauls the state’s “growing zero-emission vehicle market and robust motor vehicle emission control rules and augments them to meet more aggressive tailpipe emissions standards and ramp up to 100% zero-emission vehicles.” As noted by Money, the states’ plans to ban gas-powered vehicles have generally not required votes from lawmakers, but have been advanced with support from governors and environmental regulators. The EV market has struggled in recent months, as highlighted by The Daily Wire. Ford, for example, had to cut 1,400 employees from its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, rolled back the planned production number of the electric F-150 Lightnings in half, and slashed $12 billion in EV investments. President Biden, however, is not slowing down when it comes to targeting the gas-powered vehicle industry. Earlier this month, Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new eye-popping regulations in an effort to increase the number of electric vehicles on the road. The new EPA rules set emission standards for vehicles made between 2027 and 2032 and would eliminate more than 7 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, setting off concerns across the nation. For example, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) railed against the EPA’s move, calling it both “reckless” and “ill-informed.” “The federal government has no authority and no right to mandate what type of car or truck Americans can purchase for their everyday lives,” the senator said. “This reckless and ill-informed rule will impose what is effectively an EV mandate without ensuring the security of our supply chains from nations like China and without a realistic transition plan that addresses our domestic infrastructure needs.” </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author argues that the US goverment has no authority to decide which cars can be sold. He mentions multiple problems with electric cars including insufficient infrastructure, supply chains, and issues with manufacturers.

EN_CC_200007.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

none

The text criticises climate policies about electric vehicles underlining the negative impact on the US economy. It argues that the market of EVs isn't big enough to substitute vehicles with combustion engines.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> These 8 States Plan On Banning Sale Of Gas-Powered Vehicles As Biden EPA Tackles ‘Climate Crisis’ Eight states — California, Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington — and the District of Columbia are now on board with plans to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles within the next decade. The plans to phase out the vehicles and switch to electric and hybrid vehicles come as the Biden administration continues to pursue its lofty climate goals in a struggling economy. The administration, for example, wants half of all new cars and trucks sold in 2030 to be zero-emission, despite sputtering EV sales. All 8 of the states and D.C. have adopted the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, and will have an outright ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles after 2035. California was the first to adopt the rule, aiming to have 35% of new vehicle sales emit zero emissions by 2026, and boosting that goal to 68% by 2030. According to the California Air Resources Board, the regulation overhauls the state’s “growing zero-emission vehicle market and robust motor vehicle emission control rules and augments them to meet more aggressive tailpipe emissions standards and ramp up to 100% zero-emission vehicles.” As noted by Money, the states’ plans to ban gas-powered vehicles have generally not required votes from lawmakers, but have been advanced with support from governors and environmental regulators. The EV market has struggled in recent months, as highlighted by The Daily Wire. Ford, for example, had to cut 1,400 employees from its Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, rolled back the planned production number of the electric F-150 Lightnings in half, and slashed $12 billion in EV investments. President Biden, however, is not slowing down when it comes to targeting the gas-powered vehicle industry. Earlier this month, Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set new eye-popping regulations in an effort to increase the number of electric vehicles on the road. The new EPA rules set emission standards for vehicles made between 2027 and 2032 and would eliminate more than 7 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, setting off concerns across the nation. For example, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) railed against the EPA’s move, calling it both “reckless” and “ill-informed.” “The federal government has no authority and no right to mandate what type of car or truck Americans can purchase for their everyday lives,” the senator said. “This reckless and ill-informed rule will impose what is effectively an EV mandate without ensuring the security of our supply chains from nations like China and without a realistic transition plan that addresses our domestic infrastructure needs.” </document> <category> CC: Criticism of climate policies </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs criticize US climate policies for the promotion of electric cars. Main argument is that such vehicles are not reliable, while the raw materials to make them are often not available on US territory

EN_CC_200007.txt

CC: Criticism of climate policies

none

The text criticises climate policies about electric vehicles underlining the negative impact on the US economy. It argues that the market of EVs isn't big enough to substitute vehicles with combustion engines.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues Russian President Vladimir Putin gave statements on Tuesday which assessed the overall status of the nearly two-year conflict with Ukraine at a moment Western and world leaders meet in Davos for the World Economic Forum (WEF). Zelensky while there in Switzerland pressed Ukraine's case for the need to achieve air superiority. But Putin in his fresh remarks stressed that not only do Russian forces have the clear upper hand, but he emphasized for the first time that Ukrainian statehood itself risks an "irreparable" blow if the war continues. He stressed that Ukraine's military has already "failed". "Not only has their counteroffensive failed, but the initiative is entirely in the hands of the Russian Armed Forces," Putin said in the televised remarks. "If this continues, Ukraine's statehood could be dealt an irreparable, very serious blow," he added, but he didn't clarify further precisely what he meant by this. "They are trying to show that they can also do something. But instead of solving military tasks, they act in such a barbaric way. Attacks are being carried out on peaceful settlements with indiscriminate weapons," Putin said in reference to the past several weeks of cross-border attacks on Belgorod city, which have killed and maimed Russian civilians. Putin further addressed Zelensky's efforts to gather world leaders for a peace summit hosted by Switzerland, to consider Kiev's 10-point peace plan, which it should be noted rejects the possibility of territorial concessions. "The so-called 'peace formula' that's being talked about in the West and in Ukraine is a continuation of the decree of the Ukrainian president banning negotiations with Russia," Putin said, according to a translation in Sputnik. "As for the negotiating process, it's an attempt to encourage us to abandon the territorial gains we've achieved over the past 1 1/2 years. But this is impossible. Everyone understands that this is impossible," the Russian leader continued. He explained that earlier in the conflict, the two sides were close to serious negotiations that could have led to peace, but that ultimately Zelensky allowed himself to be the puppet of Western powers... "A day later, they threw all the agreements into the trash, and now they are saying publicly—including the head of the Ukrainian negotiating group—that 'Yes, we were ready, but we missed the chance, because then-Prime Minister of Britain Mr. [Boris] Johnson came and persuaded us not to implement these agreements,'" Putin said. He stressed: "Fools, are they not? They're admitting directly that if they had gone for it, everything could have been ended a long time ago, 1 1/2 years ago." Lately, Ukraine has been seeking to get China involved in getting on board with its peace formula. Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak on Sunday said, "China needs to be involved in talks to end the war with Russia." He issued the words just ahead of the WEF. China remains the most influential Global South country widely viewed as squarely in Russia's corner, having refused to rebuke Moscow or join Western-led sanctions after two years of the conflict. Kiev hopes to get Global South countries on its side, thus further isolating Moscow - but so far this has proved somewhat futile. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs address the failure of the Ukrainian armed forces, emphasising that Ukraine is fighting a loosing war and it is only a matter of time before the country's territorial integrity will be compromised. Ukraine is depicted as having the international support of Western countries only.

EN_UA_022339.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing

Article claiming through Putins statements that Ukrainian military has failed and is in a state of collapse, highlighting several examples of Ukraine's incompetence and submission to West's interests.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues Russian President Vladimir Putin gave statements on Tuesday which assessed the overall status of the nearly two-year conflict with Ukraine at a moment Western and world leaders meet in Davos for the World Economic Forum (WEF). Zelensky while there in Switzerland pressed Ukraine's case for the need to achieve air superiority. But Putin in his fresh remarks stressed that not only do Russian forces have the clear upper hand, but he emphasized for the first time that Ukrainian statehood itself risks an "irreparable" blow if the war continues. He stressed that Ukraine's military has already "failed". "Not only has their counteroffensive failed, but the initiative is entirely in the hands of the Russian Armed Forces," Putin said in the televised remarks. "If this continues, Ukraine's statehood could be dealt an irreparable, very serious blow," he added, but he didn't clarify further precisely what he meant by this. "They are trying to show that they can also do something. But instead of solving military tasks, they act in such a barbaric way. Attacks are being carried out on peaceful settlements with indiscriminate weapons," Putin said in reference to the past several weeks of cross-border attacks on Belgorod city, which have killed and maimed Russian civilians. Putin further addressed Zelensky's efforts to gather world leaders for a peace summit hosted by Switzerland, to consider Kiev's 10-point peace plan, which it should be noted rejects the possibility of territorial concessions. "The so-called 'peace formula' that's being talked about in the West and in Ukraine is a continuation of the decree of the Ukrainian president banning negotiations with Russia," Putin said, according to a translation in Sputnik. "As for the negotiating process, it's an attempt to encourage us to abandon the territorial gains we've achieved over the past 1 1/2 years. But this is impossible. Everyone understands that this is impossible," the Russian leader continued. He explained that earlier in the conflict, the two sides were close to serious negotiations that could have led to peace, but that ultimately Zelensky allowed himself to be the puppet of Western powers... "A day later, they threw all the agreements into the trash, and now they are saying publicly—including the head of the Ukrainian negotiating group—that 'Yes, we were ready, but we missed the chance, because then-Prime Minister of Britain Mr. [Boris] Johnson came and persuaded us not to implement these agreements,'" Putin said. He stressed: "Fools, are they not? They're admitting directly that if they had gone for it, everything could have been ended a long time ago, 1 1/2 years ago." Lately, Ukraine has been seeking to get China involved in getting on board with its peace formula. Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak on Sunday said, "China needs to be involved in talks to end the war with Russia." He issued the words just ahead of the WEF. China remains the most influential Global South country widely viewed as squarely in Russia's corner, having refused to rebuke Moscow or join Western-led sanctions after two years of the conflict. Kiev hopes to get Global South countries on its side, thus further isolating Moscow - but so far this has proved somewhat futile. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has multiple passages emphasising the failure of Ukrainian offensive operations and the weakness of the Ukrainian army, fostering the idea that Ukraine's military is crumbling

EN_UA_022339.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing

Article claiming through Putins statements that Ukrainian military has failed and is in a state of collapse, highlighting several examples of Ukraine's incompetence and submission to West's interests.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues Russian President Vladimir Putin gave statements on Tuesday which assessed the overall status of the nearly two-year conflict with Ukraine at a moment Western and world leaders meet in Davos for the World Economic Forum (WEF). Zelensky while there in Switzerland pressed Ukraine's case for the need to achieve air superiority. But Putin in his fresh remarks stressed that not only do Russian forces have the clear upper hand, but he emphasized for the first time that Ukrainian statehood itself risks an "irreparable" blow if the war continues. He stressed that Ukraine's military has already "failed". "Not only has their counteroffensive failed, but the initiative is entirely in the hands of the Russian Armed Forces," Putin said in the televised remarks. "If this continues, Ukraine's statehood could be dealt an irreparable, very serious blow," he added, but he didn't clarify further precisely what he meant by this. "They are trying to show that they can also do something. But instead of solving military tasks, they act in such a barbaric way. Attacks are being carried out on peaceful settlements with indiscriminate weapons," Putin said in reference to the past several weeks of cross-border attacks on Belgorod city, which have killed and maimed Russian civilians. Putin further addressed Zelensky's efforts to gather world leaders for a peace summit hosted by Switzerland, to consider Kiev's 10-point peace plan, which it should be noted rejects the possibility of territorial concessions. "The so-called 'peace formula' that's being talked about in the West and in Ukraine is a continuation of the decree of the Ukrainian president banning negotiations with Russia," Putin said, according to a translation in Sputnik. "As for the negotiating process, it's an attempt to encourage us to abandon the territorial gains we've achieved over the past 1 1/2 years. But this is impossible. Everyone understands that this is impossible," the Russian leader continued. He explained that earlier in the conflict, the two sides were close to serious negotiations that could have led to peace, but that ultimately Zelensky allowed himself to be the puppet of Western powers... "A day later, they threw all the agreements into the trash, and now they are saying publicly—including the head of the Ukrainian negotiating group—that 'Yes, we were ready, but we missed the chance, because then-Prime Minister of Britain Mr. [Boris] Johnson came and persuaded us not to implement these agreements,'" Putin said. He stressed: "Fools, are they not? They're admitting directly that if they had gone for it, everything could have been ended a long time ago, 1 1/2 years ago." Lately, Ukraine has been seeking to get China involved in getting on board with its peace formula. Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak on Sunday said, "China needs to be involved in talks to end the war with Russia." He issued the words just ahead of the WEF. China remains the most influential Global South country widely viewed as squarely in Russia's corner, having refused to rebuke Moscow or join Western-led sanctions after two years of the conflict. Kiev hopes to get Global South countries on its side, thus further isolating Moscow - but so far this has proved somewhat futile. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article presenting multiple quotes Russian officials stating that Ukrainian army is failing, using strong and absolute words

EN_UA_022339.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing

Article claiming through Putins statements that Ukrainian military has failed and is in a state of collapse, highlighting several examples of Ukraine's incompetence and submission to West's interests.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues Russian President Vladimir Putin gave statements on Tuesday which assessed the overall status of the nearly two-year conflict with Ukraine at a moment Western and world leaders meet in Davos for the World Economic Forum (WEF). Zelensky while there in Switzerland pressed Ukraine's case for the need to achieve air superiority. But Putin in his fresh remarks stressed that not only do Russian forces have the clear upper hand, but he emphasized for the first time that Ukrainian statehood itself risks an "irreparable" blow if the war continues. He stressed that Ukraine's military has already "failed". "Not only has their counteroffensive failed, but the initiative is entirely in the hands of the Russian Armed Forces," Putin said in the televised remarks. "If this continues, Ukraine's statehood could be dealt an irreparable, very serious blow," he added, but he didn't clarify further precisely what he meant by this. "They are trying to show that they can also do something. But instead of solving military tasks, they act in such a barbaric way. Attacks are being carried out on peaceful settlements with indiscriminate weapons," Putin said in reference to the past several weeks of cross-border attacks on Belgorod city, which have killed and maimed Russian civilians. Putin further addressed Zelensky's efforts to gather world leaders for a peace summit hosted by Switzerland, to consider Kiev's 10-point peace plan, which it should be noted rejects the possibility of territorial concessions. "The so-called 'peace formula' that's being talked about in the West and in Ukraine is a continuation of the decree of the Ukrainian president banning negotiations with Russia," Putin said, according to a translation in Sputnik. "As for the negotiating process, it's an attempt to encourage us to abandon the territorial gains we've achieved over the past 1 1/2 years. But this is impossible. Everyone understands that this is impossible," the Russian leader continued. He explained that earlier in the conflict, the two sides were close to serious negotiations that could have led to peace, but that ultimately Zelensky allowed himself to be the puppet of Western powers... "A day later, they threw all the agreements into the trash, and now they are saying publicly—including the head of the Ukrainian negotiating group—that 'Yes, we were ready, but we missed the chance, because then-Prime Minister of Britain Mr. [Boris] Johnson came and persuaded us not to implement these agreements,'" Putin said. He stressed: "Fools, are they not? They're admitting directly that if they had gone for it, everything could have been ended a long time ago, 1 1/2 years ago." Lately, Ukraine has been seeking to get China involved in getting on board with its peace formula. Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak on Sunday said, "China needs to be involved in talks to end the war with Russia." He issued the words just ahead of the WEF. China remains the most influential Global South country widely viewed as squarely in Russia's corner, having refused to rebuke Moscow or join Western-led sanctions after two years of the conflict. Kiev hopes to get Global South countries on its side, thus further isolating Moscow - but so far this has proved somewhat futile. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a narrative depicting the Ukrainian military as ineffective. It attributes a number of military failures to the Ukrainian side, stressing that Russia has the upper hand.

EN_UA_022339.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing

Article claiming through Putins statements that Ukrainian military has failed and is in a state of collapse, highlighting several examples of Ukraine's incompetence and submission to West's interests.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues "Aren't They Fools?": Putin Says Ukrainian Statehood Risks 'Irreparable Blow' If War Continues Russian President Vladimir Putin gave statements on Tuesday which assessed the overall status of the nearly two-year conflict with Ukraine at a moment Western and world leaders meet in Davos for the World Economic Forum (WEF). Zelensky while there in Switzerland pressed Ukraine's case for the need to achieve air superiority. But Putin in his fresh remarks stressed that not only do Russian forces have the clear upper hand, but he emphasized for the first time that Ukrainian statehood itself risks an "irreparable" blow if the war continues. He stressed that Ukraine's military has already "failed". "Not only has their counteroffensive failed, but the initiative is entirely in the hands of the Russian Armed Forces," Putin said in the televised remarks. "If this continues, Ukraine's statehood could be dealt an irreparable, very serious blow," he added, but he didn't clarify further precisely what he meant by this. "They are trying to show that they can also do something. But instead of solving military tasks, they act in such a barbaric way. Attacks are being carried out on peaceful settlements with indiscriminate weapons," Putin said in reference to the past several weeks of cross-border attacks on Belgorod city, which have killed and maimed Russian civilians. Putin further addressed Zelensky's efforts to gather world leaders for a peace summit hosted by Switzerland, to consider Kiev's 10-point peace plan, which it should be noted rejects the possibility of territorial concessions. "The so-called 'peace formula' that's being talked about in the West and in Ukraine is a continuation of the decree of the Ukrainian president banning negotiations with Russia," Putin said, according to a translation in Sputnik. "As for the negotiating process, it's an attempt to encourage us to abandon the territorial gains we've achieved over the past 1 1/2 years. But this is impossible. Everyone understands that this is impossible," the Russian leader continued. He explained that earlier in the conflict, the two sides were close to serious negotiations that could have led to peace, but that ultimately Zelensky allowed himself to be the puppet of Western powers... "A day later, they threw all the agreements into the trash, and now they are saying publicly—including the head of the Ukrainian negotiating group—that 'Yes, we were ready, but we missed the chance, because then-Prime Minister of Britain Mr. [Boris] Johnson came and persuaded us not to implement these agreements,'" Putin said. He stressed: "Fools, are they not? They're admitting directly that if they had gone for it, everything could have been ended a long time ago, 1 1/2 years ago." Lately, Ukraine has been seeking to get China involved in getting on board with its peace formula. Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak on Sunday said, "China needs to be involved in talks to end the war with Russia." He issued the words just ahead of the WEF. China remains the most influential Global South country widely viewed as squarely in Russia's corner, having refused to rebuke Moscow or join Western-led sanctions after two years of the conflict. Kiev hopes to get Global South countries on its side, thus further isolating Moscow - but so far this has proved somewhat futile. </document> <category> URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The article talks about the situation of Ukraine army that is being defeated and being in a desperate situation. In many passages, Ukraine's effort is described as inefficient, highlighting how they are doing the wrong choice in following the West's orders

EN_UA_022339.txt

URW: Speculating war outcomes

URW: Speculating war outcomes: Ukrainian army is collapsing

Article claiming through Putins statements that Ukrainian military has failed and is in a state of collapse, highlighting several examples of Ukraine's incompetence and submission to West's interests.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> U.K. Backs $1 Trillion Climate ‘Reparations’ I... What fresh nonsense is this? Climate ‘reparations’ are coming, to compensate other countries for the ‘extreme weather’ they’ve been experiencing, which is allegedly our fault, because a model which has always been wrong said so. The U.K. has now backed the transparent scam. The Telegraph has more. Britain has opened the door to paying climate change reparations to developing countries by supporting talks on the issue at the COP27 summit. On Sunday, at the meeting in Egypt, U.K. negotiators backed a last-minute agreement to address “loss and damage” payments to countries badly affected by climate-related disasters. Rishi Sunak will appear at the conference in Sharm el-Sheikh on Monday, where he will pledge £65.5 million for green technology in developing countries. The Prime Minister will say: “By honouring the pledges we made in Glasgow, we can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission for new jobs and clean growth. And we can bequeath our children a greener planet and a more prosperous future. That’s a legacy we could be proud of.” Boris Johnson will also deliver a speech warning against the “naysayers” who threaten Net Zero targets. Pakistan is leading a push by developing countries including Bangladesh and the Maldives for compensation from richer countries responsible for most of the world’s pollution. The U.K. backed the issue being on the COP27 agenda during two days of negotiations ahead of the Egypt summit and is understood to accept that a deal must be done over the economic cost of climate change, which is forecast to reach $1 trillion by 2050. On Sunday night, a Downing Street source said Mr Sunak planned to “scale up progress and support” for developing countries suffering the worst effects of global warming. The Prime Minister will come under pressure in Egypt to agree to a costly deal on reparations at the same time as he draws up plans for sweeping domestic tax rises and spending cuts. On Sunday night, Treasury sources said Jeremy Hunt had signed off up to £35 billion in spending cuts and up to £25 billion in tax hikes to fill an estimated financial black hole of £60 billion. Labour has backed calls for the U.K. to pay other countries affected by climate change, with Ed Miliband, the shadow climate minister, calling it a “moral responsibility”. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text conveys a sense of outrage that UK is supporting the paying of climate reparations to other countries which have been suffering the effects of climate change. Several paragraphs criticsie the decision arguing that it's unjustified given the absence of evidence and the fact that UK has been a net contributor to climate change

EN_CC_100069.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the UK paying developing countries reparations for the climate damage they experienced due to the UK's actions that harm the climate. The author is vividly calling it "nonsense".

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> U.K. Backs $1 Trillion Climate ‘Reparations’ I... What fresh nonsense is this? Climate ‘reparations’ are coming, to compensate other countries for the ‘extreme weather’ they’ve been experiencing, which is allegedly our fault, because a model which has always been wrong said so. The U.K. has now backed the transparent scam. The Telegraph has more. Britain has opened the door to paying climate change reparations to developing countries by supporting talks on the issue at the COP27 summit. On Sunday, at the meeting in Egypt, U.K. negotiators backed a last-minute agreement to address “loss and damage” payments to countries badly affected by climate-related disasters. Rishi Sunak will appear at the conference in Sharm el-Sheikh on Monday, where he will pledge £65.5 million for green technology in developing countries. The Prime Minister will say: “By honouring the pledges we made in Glasgow, we can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission for new jobs and clean growth. And we can bequeath our children a greener planet and a more prosperous future. That’s a legacy we could be proud of.” Boris Johnson will also deliver a speech warning against the “naysayers” who threaten Net Zero targets. Pakistan is leading a push by developing countries including Bangladesh and the Maldives for compensation from richer countries responsible for most of the world’s pollution. The U.K. backed the issue being on the COP27 agenda during two days of negotiations ahead of the Egypt summit and is understood to accept that a deal must be done over the economic cost of climate change, which is forecast to reach $1 trillion by 2050. On Sunday night, a Downing Street source said Mr Sunak planned to “scale up progress and support” for developing countries suffering the worst effects of global warming. The Prime Minister will come under pressure in Egypt to agree to a costly deal on reparations at the same time as he draws up plans for sweeping domestic tax rises and spending cuts. On Sunday night, Treasury sources said Jeremy Hunt had signed off up to £35 billion in spending cuts and up to £25 billion in tax hikes to fill an estimated financial black hole of £60 billion. Labour has backed calls for the U.K. to pay other countries affected by climate change, with Ed Miliband, the shadow climate minister, calling it a “moral responsibility”. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises the UK government for supporting climate reparations for other countries that have been affected by climate change

EN_CC_100069.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the UK paying developing countries reparations for the climate damage they experienced due to the UK's actions that harm the climate. The author is vividly calling it "nonsense".

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> U.K. Backs $1 Trillion Climate ‘Reparations’ I... What fresh nonsense is this? Climate ‘reparations’ are coming, to compensate other countries for the ‘extreme weather’ they’ve been experiencing, which is allegedly our fault, because a model which has always been wrong said so. The U.K. has now backed the transparent scam. The Telegraph has more. Britain has opened the door to paying climate change reparations to developing countries by supporting talks on the issue at the COP27 summit. On Sunday, at the meeting in Egypt, U.K. negotiators backed a last-minute agreement to address “loss and damage” payments to countries badly affected by climate-related disasters. Rishi Sunak will appear at the conference in Sharm el-Sheikh on Monday, where he will pledge £65.5 million for green technology in developing countries. The Prime Minister will say: “By honouring the pledges we made in Glasgow, we can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission for new jobs and clean growth. And we can bequeath our children a greener planet and a more prosperous future. That’s a legacy we could be proud of.” Boris Johnson will also deliver a speech warning against the “naysayers” who threaten Net Zero targets. Pakistan is leading a push by developing countries including Bangladesh and the Maldives for compensation from richer countries responsible for most of the world’s pollution. The U.K. backed the issue being on the COP27 agenda during two days of negotiations ahead of the Egypt summit and is understood to accept that a deal must be done over the economic cost of climate change, which is forecast to reach $1 trillion by 2050. On Sunday night, a Downing Street source said Mr Sunak planned to “scale up progress and support” for developing countries suffering the worst effects of global warming. The Prime Minister will come under pressure in Egypt to agree to a costly deal on reparations at the same time as he draws up plans for sweeping domestic tax rises and spending cuts. On Sunday night, Treasury sources said Jeremy Hunt had signed off up to £35 billion in spending cuts and up to £25 billion in tax hikes to fill an estimated financial black hole of £60 billion. Labour has backed calls for the U.K. to pay other countries affected by climate change, with Ed Miliband, the shadow climate minister, calling it a “moral responsibility”. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Article reporting that the UK will pay developing countries for the extreme weather they are experiencing, that is allegedly the consequence of the UK's climate policies.

EN_CC_100069.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the UK paying developing countries reparations for the climate damage they experienced due to the UK's actions that harm the climate. The author is vividly calling it "nonsense".

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> U.K. Backs $1 Trillion Climate ‘Reparations’ I... What fresh nonsense is this? Climate ‘reparations’ are coming, to compensate other countries for the ‘extreme weather’ they’ve been experiencing, which is allegedly our fault, because a model which has always been wrong said so. The U.K. has now backed the transparent scam. The Telegraph has more. Britain has opened the door to paying climate change reparations to developing countries by supporting talks on the issue at the COP27 summit. On Sunday, at the meeting in Egypt, U.K. negotiators backed a last-minute agreement to address “loss and damage” payments to countries badly affected by climate-related disasters. Rishi Sunak will appear at the conference in Sharm el-Sheikh on Monday, where he will pledge £65.5 million for green technology in developing countries. The Prime Minister will say: “By honouring the pledges we made in Glasgow, we can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission for new jobs and clean growth. And we can bequeath our children a greener planet and a more prosperous future. That’s a legacy we could be proud of.” Boris Johnson will also deliver a speech warning against the “naysayers” who threaten Net Zero targets. Pakistan is leading a push by developing countries including Bangladesh and the Maldives for compensation from richer countries responsible for most of the world’s pollution. The U.K. backed the issue being on the COP27 agenda during two days of negotiations ahead of the Egypt summit and is understood to accept that a deal must be done over the economic cost of climate change, which is forecast to reach $1 trillion by 2050. On Sunday night, a Downing Street source said Mr Sunak planned to “scale up progress and support” for developing countries suffering the worst effects of global warming. The Prime Minister will come under pressure in Egypt to agree to a costly deal on reparations at the same time as he draws up plans for sweeping domestic tax rises and spending cuts. On Sunday night, Treasury sources said Jeremy Hunt had signed off up to £35 billion in spending cuts and up to £25 billion in tax hikes to fill an estimated financial black hole of £60 billion. Labour has backed calls for the U.K. to pay other countries affected by climate change, with Ed Miliband, the shadow climate minister, calling it a “moral responsibility”. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The author says that it is absurd for the UK to pay reparations for the CO2 emissions that the UK produced decades ago. They blame Ed Miliband, shadow climate minister, and Boris Johnson.

EN_CC_100069.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the UK paying developing countries reparations for the climate damage they experienced due to the UK's actions that harm the climate. The author is vividly calling it "nonsense".

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> U.K. Backs $1 Trillion Climate ‘Reparations’ I... What fresh nonsense is this? Climate ‘reparations’ are coming, to compensate other countries for the ‘extreme weather’ they’ve been experiencing, which is allegedly our fault, because a model which has always been wrong said so. The U.K. has now backed the transparent scam. The Telegraph has more. Britain has opened the door to paying climate change reparations to developing countries by supporting talks on the issue at the COP27 summit. On Sunday, at the meeting in Egypt, U.K. negotiators backed a last-minute agreement to address “loss and damage” payments to countries badly affected by climate-related disasters. Rishi Sunak will appear at the conference in Sharm el-Sheikh on Monday, where he will pledge £65.5 million for green technology in developing countries. The Prime Minister will say: “By honouring the pledges we made in Glasgow, we can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission for new jobs and clean growth. And we can bequeath our children a greener planet and a more prosperous future. That’s a legacy we could be proud of.” Boris Johnson will also deliver a speech warning against the “naysayers” who threaten Net Zero targets. Pakistan is leading a push by developing countries including Bangladesh and the Maldives for compensation from richer countries responsible for most of the world’s pollution. The U.K. backed the issue being on the COP27 agenda during two days of negotiations ahead of the Egypt summit and is understood to accept that a deal must be done over the economic cost of climate change, which is forecast to reach $1 trillion by 2050. On Sunday night, a Downing Street source said Mr Sunak planned to “scale up progress and support” for developing countries suffering the worst effects of global warming. The Prime Minister will come under pressure in Egypt to agree to a costly deal on reparations at the same time as he draws up plans for sweeping domestic tax rises and spending cuts. On Sunday night, Treasury sources said Jeremy Hunt had signed off up to £35 billion in spending cuts and up to £25 billion in tax hikes to fill an estimated financial black hole of £60 billion. Labour has backed calls for the U.K. to pay other countries affected by climate change, with Ed Miliband, the shadow climate minister, calling it a “moral responsibility”. </document> <category> CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs depict the UK government as irresponsible for supporting the climate reparations scam.

EN_CC_100069.txt

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities

CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments

The article talks about the UK paying developing countries reparations for the climate damage they experienced due to the UK's actions that harm the climate. The author is vividly calling it "nonsense".

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies Currency British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies The first major attack on Russian territory since World War II, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' offensive in the Kursk region, has publicly humiliated Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. However, he is not the only one who was humiliated and stunned by the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Ukraine's partners, among those who provide weapons but restrict their use, are in the same position. This is the opinion of Colonel Richard Justin Kemp, a retired British Army officer and knight, who was awarded the highest honor in the UK. In his opinion, the Ukrainian offensive "showed the cowardice of the allies," especially US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Sir Richard Kemp recalls how President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had previously asked Western partners to allow the use of long-range weapons to protect both Ukrainian soldiers and Ukraine in general. "The British Storm Shadow missiles could make a difference in this battle, but the British government is unwilling to allow them to be used to their full potential. What, in Sir Keir Starmer's opinion, is the point of a strike on Russian territory, apart from protecting Ukraine? And how would the Second World War have ended if the Prime Minister had not allowed British and American bombs to fall on German soil?" asks the colonel. According to Sir Richard Kemp, throughout the entire period of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, "the most pathetic were the Western allies" who pursued a policy not based on Ukraine's defense needs, "but on the groundless fear of Russian retaliation." And although all of Putin's so-called red lines turned out to be nothing more than baseless intimidation, each subsequent Western decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, tanks, or combat aircraft "was reluctant, half-hearted, inadequate, and gripped by fear." Incidentally, it was these fears and the "miserable policy" of the partners that ensured the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, the Briton believes. "Ukraine was able to launch an unexpected attack on Russian territory because most of the border with the enemy was left almost unguarded. The fact is that Putin knew that his territory remained virtually invulnerable to attack because of Western restrictions on the use of weapons. This also applies to airfields, supply routes, and logistics bases. Significant forces needed to protect them have been thrown into the war in Ukraine," the colonel said. "What Western leaders don't realize is that when you're facing a tyrant like Putin, escalation is the only language he fears and understands. We see the same thing in the Middle East, where Biden is pleading with Israel to de-escalate. But his unconvincing 'no' will not stop Ayatollah Khamenei from pushing the button and launching Iran's expected missile attack, just as it did not stop Putin from attacking Ukraine," Sir Richard Kemp said. Ukraine's offensive near Kursk has taught the West a "salutary lesson," the military said. "Despite the capture of thousands of square kilometers of Russia's holy shrines, no nuclear missiles were raining down on Kyiv. The truth is that if Ukraine had been allowed to escalate from the very beginning, it could have brought this war to an end on favorable terms for Kyiv," the British colonel believes. Only verified information is available on the OBOZ.UA Telegram channel and Viber. Do not fall for fakes! </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text criticises Western allies of Ukraine arguing they are weak due to not allowing Ukrainian Armed Forces to use long-range missiles or weapons on Russian soil.

EN_UA_029053.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The text criticise Western countries supporting Ukraine in multiple passages. The main argument is that Ukraine suffered the consequences of the limitations imposed by Western countries in using weapons on Russian soil.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies Currency British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies The first major attack on Russian territory since World War II, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' offensive in the Kursk region, has publicly humiliated Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. However, he is not the only one who was humiliated and stunned by the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Ukraine's partners, among those who provide weapons but restrict their use, are in the same position. This is the opinion of Colonel Richard Justin Kemp, a retired British Army officer and knight, who was awarded the highest honor in the UK. In his opinion, the Ukrainian offensive "showed the cowardice of the allies," especially US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Sir Richard Kemp recalls how President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had previously asked Western partners to allow the use of long-range weapons to protect both Ukrainian soldiers and Ukraine in general. "The British Storm Shadow missiles could make a difference in this battle, but the British government is unwilling to allow them to be used to their full potential. What, in Sir Keir Starmer's opinion, is the point of a strike on Russian territory, apart from protecting Ukraine? And how would the Second World War have ended if the Prime Minister had not allowed British and American bombs to fall on German soil?" asks the colonel. According to Sir Richard Kemp, throughout the entire period of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, "the most pathetic were the Western allies" who pursued a policy not based on Ukraine's defense needs, "but on the groundless fear of Russian retaliation." And although all of Putin's so-called red lines turned out to be nothing more than baseless intimidation, each subsequent Western decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, tanks, or combat aircraft "was reluctant, half-hearted, inadequate, and gripped by fear." Incidentally, it was these fears and the "miserable policy" of the partners that ensured the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, the Briton believes. "Ukraine was able to launch an unexpected attack on Russian territory because most of the border with the enemy was left almost unguarded. The fact is that Putin knew that his territory remained virtually invulnerable to attack because of Western restrictions on the use of weapons. This also applies to airfields, supply routes, and logistics bases. Significant forces needed to protect them have been thrown into the war in Ukraine," the colonel said. "What Western leaders don't realize is that when you're facing a tyrant like Putin, escalation is the only language he fears and understands. We see the same thing in the Middle East, where Biden is pleading with Israel to de-escalate. But his unconvincing 'no' will not stop Ayatollah Khamenei from pushing the button and launching Iran's expected missile attack, just as it did not stop Putin from attacking Ukraine," Sir Richard Kemp said. Ukraine's offensive near Kursk has taught the West a "salutary lesson," the military said. "Despite the capture of thousands of square kilometers of Russia's holy shrines, no nuclear missiles were raining down on Kyiv. The truth is that if Ukraine had been allowed to escalate from the very beginning, it could have brought this war to an end on favorable terms for Kyiv," the British colonel believes. Only verified information is available on the OBOZ.UA Telegram channel and Viber. Do not fall for fakes! </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text attacks Western countries providing military help to Ukraine in several passages. Western countries are described as weak as they allegedly restrict the use of weapons.

EN_UA_029053.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The text criticise Western countries supporting Ukraine in multiple passages. The main argument is that Ukraine suffered the consequences of the limitations imposed by Western countries in using weapons on Russian soil.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies Currency British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies The first major attack on Russian territory since World War II, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' offensive in the Kursk region, has publicly humiliated Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. However, he is not the only one who was humiliated and stunned by the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Ukraine's partners, among those who provide weapons but restrict their use, are in the same position. This is the opinion of Colonel Richard Justin Kemp, a retired British Army officer and knight, who was awarded the highest honor in the UK. In his opinion, the Ukrainian offensive "showed the cowardice of the allies," especially US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Sir Richard Kemp recalls how President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had previously asked Western partners to allow the use of long-range weapons to protect both Ukrainian soldiers and Ukraine in general. "The British Storm Shadow missiles could make a difference in this battle, but the British government is unwilling to allow them to be used to their full potential. What, in Sir Keir Starmer's opinion, is the point of a strike on Russian territory, apart from protecting Ukraine? And how would the Second World War have ended if the Prime Minister had not allowed British and American bombs to fall on German soil?" asks the colonel. According to Sir Richard Kemp, throughout the entire period of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, "the most pathetic were the Western allies" who pursued a policy not based on Ukraine's defense needs, "but on the groundless fear of Russian retaliation." And although all of Putin's so-called red lines turned out to be nothing more than baseless intimidation, each subsequent Western decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, tanks, or combat aircraft "was reluctant, half-hearted, inadequate, and gripped by fear." Incidentally, it was these fears and the "miserable policy" of the partners that ensured the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, the Briton believes. "Ukraine was able to launch an unexpected attack on Russian territory because most of the border with the enemy was left almost unguarded. The fact is that Putin knew that his territory remained virtually invulnerable to attack because of Western restrictions on the use of weapons. This also applies to airfields, supply routes, and logistics bases. Significant forces needed to protect them have been thrown into the war in Ukraine," the colonel said. "What Western leaders don't realize is that when you're facing a tyrant like Putin, escalation is the only language he fears and understands. We see the same thing in the Middle East, where Biden is pleading with Israel to de-escalate. But his unconvincing 'no' will not stop Ayatollah Khamenei from pushing the button and launching Iran's expected missile attack, just as it did not stop Putin from attacking Ukraine," Sir Richard Kemp said. Ukraine's offensive near Kursk has taught the West a "salutary lesson," the military said. "Despite the capture of thousands of square kilometers of Russia's holy shrines, no nuclear missiles were raining down on Kyiv. The truth is that if Ukraine had been allowed to escalate from the very beginning, it could have brought this war to an end on favorable terms for Kyiv," the British colonel believes. Only verified information is available on the OBOZ.UA Telegram channel and Viber. Do not fall for fakes! </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

The text has multiple paragraphs that attribute the Russian success in the Kursk region to the fact that Ukrainian could launch a surprise attack due to the fact that most of the border with Russia was left almost unguarded. These claims are justified by the fact that Western countries had restrictions on the use of weapons in Ukraine.

EN_UA_029053.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The text criticise Western countries supporting Ukraine in multiple passages. The main argument is that Ukraine suffered the consequences of the limitations imposed by Western countries in using weapons on Russian soil.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies Currency British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies The first major attack on Russian territory since World War II, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' offensive in the Kursk region, has publicly humiliated Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. However, he is not the only one who was humiliated and stunned by the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Ukraine's partners, among those who provide weapons but restrict their use, are in the same position. This is the opinion of Colonel Richard Justin Kemp, a retired British Army officer and knight, who was awarded the highest honor in the UK. In his opinion, the Ukrainian offensive "showed the cowardice of the allies," especially US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Sir Richard Kemp recalls how President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had previously asked Western partners to allow the use of long-range weapons to protect both Ukrainian soldiers and Ukraine in general. "The British Storm Shadow missiles could make a difference in this battle, but the British government is unwilling to allow them to be used to their full potential. What, in Sir Keir Starmer's opinion, is the point of a strike on Russian territory, apart from protecting Ukraine? And how would the Second World War have ended if the Prime Minister had not allowed British and American bombs to fall on German soil?" asks the colonel. According to Sir Richard Kemp, throughout the entire period of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, "the most pathetic were the Western allies" who pursued a policy not based on Ukraine's defense needs, "but on the groundless fear of Russian retaliation." And although all of Putin's so-called red lines turned out to be nothing more than baseless intimidation, each subsequent Western decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, tanks, or combat aircraft "was reluctant, half-hearted, inadequate, and gripped by fear." Incidentally, it was these fears and the "miserable policy" of the partners that ensured the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, the Briton believes. "Ukraine was able to launch an unexpected attack on Russian territory because most of the border with the enemy was left almost unguarded. The fact is that Putin knew that his territory remained virtually invulnerable to attack because of Western restrictions on the use of weapons. This also applies to airfields, supply routes, and logistics bases. Significant forces needed to protect them have been thrown into the war in Ukraine," the colonel said. "What Western leaders don't realize is that when you're facing a tyrant like Putin, escalation is the only language he fears and understands. We see the same thing in the Middle East, where Biden is pleading with Israel to de-escalate. But his unconvincing 'no' will not stop Ayatollah Khamenei from pushing the button and launching Iran's expected missile attack, just as it did not stop Putin from attacking Ukraine," Sir Richard Kemp said. Ukraine's offensive near Kursk has taught the West a "salutary lesson," the military said. "Despite the capture of thousands of square kilometers of Russia's holy shrines, no nuclear missiles were raining down on Kyiv. The truth is that if Ukraine had been allowed to escalate from the very beginning, it could have brought this war to an end on favorable terms for Kyiv," the British colonel believes. Only verified information is available on the OBOZ.UA Telegram channel and Viber. Do not fall for fakes! </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Multiple paragraphs together depict Western countries as weak since they provide only limited military support to Ukraine as well as are scared to escalate the conflict with Russia

EN_UA_029053.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The text criticise Western countries supporting Ukraine in multiple passages. The main argument is that Ukraine suffered the consequences of the limitations imposed by Western countries in using weapons on Russian soil.

<bos><start_of_turn>user <document> British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies Currency British colonel: Ukrainian operation in Kursk region humiliated Putin and showed cowardice of allies The first major attack on Russian territory since World War II, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' offensive in the Kursk region, has publicly humiliated Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. However, he is not the only one who was humiliated and stunned by the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian territory. Ukraine's partners, among those who provide weapons but restrict their use, are in the same position. This is the opinion of Colonel Richard Justin Kemp, a retired British Army officer and knight, who was awarded the highest honor in the UK. In his opinion, the Ukrainian offensive "showed the cowardice of the allies," especially US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Sir Richard Kemp recalls how President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had previously asked Western partners to allow the use of long-range weapons to protect both Ukrainian soldiers and Ukraine in general. "The British Storm Shadow missiles could make a difference in this battle, but the British government is unwilling to allow them to be used to their full potential. What, in Sir Keir Starmer's opinion, is the point of a strike on Russian territory, apart from protecting Ukraine? And how would the Second World War have ended if the Prime Minister had not allowed British and American bombs to fall on German soil?" asks the colonel. According to Sir Richard Kemp, throughout the entire period of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, "the most pathetic were the Western allies" who pursued a policy not based on Ukraine's defense needs, "but on the groundless fear of Russian retaliation." And although all of Putin's so-called red lines turned out to be nothing more than baseless intimidation, each subsequent Western decision to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, tanks, or combat aircraft "was reluctant, half-hearted, inadequate, and gripped by fear." Incidentally, it was these fears and the "miserable policy" of the partners that ensured the success of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region, the Briton believes. "Ukraine was able to launch an unexpected attack on Russian territory because most of the border with the enemy was left almost unguarded. The fact is that Putin knew that his territory remained virtually invulnerable to attack because of Western restrictions on the use of weapons. This also applies to airfields, supply routes, and logistics bases. Significant forces needed to protect them have been thrown into the war in Ukraine," the colonel said. "What Western leaders don't realize is that when you're facing a tyrant like Putin, escalation is the only language he fears and understands. We see the same thing in the Middle East, where Biden is pleading with Israel to de-escalate. But his unconvincing 'no' will not stop Ayatollah Khamenei from pushing the button and launching Iran's expected missile attack, just as it did not stop Putin from attacking Ukraine," Sir Richard Kemp said. Ukraine's offensive near Kursk has taught the West a "salutary lesson," the military said. "Despite the capture of thousands of square kilometers of Russia's holy shrines, no nuclear missiles were raining down on Kyiv. The truth is that if Ukraine had been allowed to escalate from the very beginning, it could have brought this war to an end on favorable terms for Kyiv," the British colonel believes. Only verified information is available on the OBOZ.UA Telegram channel and Viber. Do not fall for fakes! </document> <category> URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak </category><end_of_turn> <start_of_turn>model

Several paragraphs present a situation where Western allies of Ukraine are described as weak for not supporting Ukraine in her battle against Russia. Indeed, Western help is considered as insufficient.

EN_UA_029053.txt

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy

URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West is weak

The text criticise Western countries supporting Ukraine in multiple passages. The main argument is that Ukraine suffered the consequences of the limitations imposed by Western countries in using weapons on Russian soil.