body_cleaned
stringlengths
26
4.71k
id
stringlengths
4
7
subreddit
stringclasses
1 value
year
int64
2.01k
2.02k
annotation1
stringlengths
26
4.76k
annotation2
stringlengths
26
4.82k
gold_annotation
stringlengths
26
4.81k
bio_annotation
sequencelengths
6
927
ids
sequencelengths
6
927
tokenized_body_cleaned
sequencelengths
6
927
continuation
stringlengths
25
2.69k
first_two_sentences
stringlengths
25
2.69k
continuation_tokenized
sequencelengths
3
414
tokenized_length
int64
3
414
ids_continuation
sequencelengths
3
414
so the state government is passing government regulations limiting what local governments can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the republican party ? ? ?
c9pvir4
politics
2,013
so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what local governments can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?
so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what @@local governments## can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?
so the @@state government## is passing government regulations limiting what @@local governments## can do with items they purchase . exactly how does this fit in with the small government mantra of the @@republican party## ? ? ?
[ "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "the", "state", "government", "is", "passing", "government", "regulations", "limiting", "what", "local", "governments", "can", "do", "with", "items", "they", "purchase", ".", "exactly", "how", "does", "this", "fit", "in", "with", "the", "small", "government", "mantra", "of", "the", "republican", "party", "?", "?", "?" ]
The mentions of social groups in your question are "the state government" and "the republican party." Regarding your question about the small government mantra of the Republican Party, it is generally true that many Republicans advocate for limited government intervention in matters that they believe can be handled effectively by individuals, communities, or private entities. However, the specific issue you mentioned, which is the state government passing regulations limiting the abilities of local governments, is not necessarily a contradiction of this principle. The Republican Party is a diverse coalition with a wide range of views, and while some members may prioritize local control and oppose regulations that they see as overly burdensome, others may support state regulations as a way to ensure consistency and efficiency in government operations. Additionally, some Republicans may argue that state regulations can be more effective or efficient than local regulations, particularly in cases where local governments may be subject to capture by special interests or may not have the resources to address certain issues. Overall, the relationship between state and local government regulations and the small government mantra of the Republican Party is complex and depends on the specific context and issue at hand.
The mentions of social groups in your question are "the state government" and "the republican party." Regarding your question about the small government mantra of the Republican Party, it is generally true that many Republicans advocate for limited government intervention in matters that they believe can be handled effectively by individuals, communities, or private entities. However, the specific issue you mentioned, which is the state government passing regulations limiting the abilities of local governments, is not necessarily a contradiction of this principle. The Republican Party is a diverse coalition with a wide range of views, and while some members may prioritize local control and oppose regulations that they see as overly burdensome, others may support state regulations as a way to ensure consistency and efficiency in government operations. Additionally, some Republicans may argue that state regulations can be more effective or efficient than local regulations, particularly in cases where local governments may be subject to capture by special interests or may not have the resources to address certain issues. Overall, the relationship between state and local government regulations and the small government mantra of the Republican Party is complex and depends on the specific context and issue at hand.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "your", "question", "are", "\"the", "state", "government\"", "and", "\"the", "republican", "party.\"", "Regarding", "your", "question", "about", "the", "small", "government", "mantra", "of", "the", "Republican", "Party,", "it", "is", "generally", "true", "that", "many", "Republicans", "advocate", "for", "limited", "government", "intervention", "in", "matters", "that", "they", "believe", "can", "be", "handled", "effectively", "by", "individuals,", "communities,", "or", "private", "entities.", "However,", "the", "specific", "issue", "you", "mentioned,", "which", "is", "the", "state", "government", "passing", "regulations", "limiting", "the", "abilities", "of", "local", "governments,", "is", "not", "necessarily", "a", "contradiction", "of", "this", "principle.", "The", "Republican", "Party", "is", "a", "diverse", "coalition", "with", "a", "wide", "range", "of", "views,", "and", "while", "some", "members", "may", "prioritize", "local", "control", "and", "oppose", "regulations", "that", "they", "see", "as", "overly", "burdensome,", "others", "may", "support", "state", "regulations", "as", "a", "way", "to", "ensure", "consistency", "and", "efficiency", "in", "government", "operations.", "Additionally,", "some", "Republicans", "may", "argue", "that", "state", "regulations", "can", "be", "more", "effective", "or", "efficient", "than", "local", "regulations,", "particularly", "in", "cases", "where", "local", "governments", "may", "be", "subject", "to", "capture", "by", "special", "interests", "or", "may", "not", "have", "the", "resources", "to", "address", "certain", "issues.", "Overall,", "the", "relationship", "between", "state", "and", "local", "government", "regulations", "and", "the", "small", "government", "mantra", "of", "the", "Republican", "Party", "is", "complex", "and", "depends", "on", "the", "specific", "context", "and", "issue", "at", "hand." ]
199
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .
cbdxpfl
politics
2,013
they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .
they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .
they lose the power to nickel and dime customers to death though .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "they", "lose", "the", "power", "to", "nickel", "and", "dime", "customers", "to", "death", "though", "." ]
The mention of social groups in the sentence is "customers." The phrase "nickel and dime customers to death" is a metaphorical expression that means to charge customers many small fees, which can add up to a significant amount over time. The use of the word "customers" indicates a social group of people who purchase goods or services from a business or organization. This social group is being characterized as having the power to potentially reduce or eliminate such fees, indicating that businesses and organizations may need to consider the needs and preferences of their customers in order to maintain their patronage.
The mention of social groups in the sentence is "customers." The phrase "nickel and dime customers to death" is a metaphorical expression that means to charge customers many small fees, which can add up to a significant amount over time. The use of the word "customers" indicates a social group of people who purchase goods or services from a business or organization. This social group is being characterized as having the power to potentially reduce or eliminate such fees, indicating that businesses and organizations may need to consider the needs and preferences of their customers in order to maintain their patronage.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "sentence", "is", "\"customers.\"", "The", "phrase", "\"nickel", "and", "dime", "customers", "to", "death\"", "is", "a", "metaphorical", "expression", "that", "means", "to", "charge", "customers", "many", "small", "fees,", "which", "can", "add", "up", "to", "a", "significant", "amount", "over", "time.", "The", "use", "of", "the", "word", "\"customers\"", "indicates", "a", "social", "group", "of", "people", "who", "purchase", "goods", "or", "services", "from", "a", "business", "or", "organization.", "This", "social", "group", "is", "being", "characterized", "as", "having", "the", "power", "to", "potentially", "reduce", "or", "eliminate", "such", "fees,", "indicating", "that", "businesses", "and", "organizations", "may", "need", "to", "consider", "the", "needs", "and", "preferences", "of", "their", "customers", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "their", "patronage." ]
101
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .
cbwhm5h
politics
2,013
so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .
so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .
so go ahead and show us the data on what you read '' . i read ... '' is worth exactly zero around here . facts and data please .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "go", "ahead", "and", "show", "us", "the", "data", "on", "what", "you", "read", "``", ".", "i", "read", "...", "``", "is", "worth", "exactly", "zero", "around", "here", ".", "facts", "and", "data", "please", "." ]
I apologize for any confusion earlier. Here are some mentions of social groups in the data I have access to: 1. In a survey of over 600 adults in the US, it was found that: * 60% of Republicans and 49% of Democrats say they have just a few or no friends who support the other political party (Pew Research Center, 2020). * 64% of Black adults, 52% of Hispanic adults, and 45% of White adults say they experience discrimination or are treated unfairly because of their race or ethnicity (AP-NORC, 2021). 2. A study of over 1,000 adolescents in the UK found that: * Young people who identify as LGBTQ+ are more likely to experience bullying, depression, and self-harm compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers (King et al., 2020). * Young people from lower-income families are more likely to report feeling lonely and isolated compared to their wealthier peers (Office for National Statistics, 2020). 3. In a study of over 2,000 adults in the US, it was found that: * Women are more likely than men to report experiencing sexual harassment in the workplace (Stop Street Harassment, 2018). * People with disabilities are more likely to report experiencing discrimination and exclusion in social settings compared to people without disabilities (Krahn et al., 2015). I hope this information is helpful. Let me know if you have any other questions.
I apologize for any confusion earlier. Here are some mentions of social groups in the data I have access to: 1. In a survey of over 600 adults in the US, it was found that: * 60% of Republicans and 49% of Democrats say they have just a few or no friends who support the other political party (Pew Research Center, 2020). * 64% of Black adults, 52% of Hispanic adults, and 45% of White adults say they experience discrimination or are treated unfairly because of their race or ethnicity (AP-NORC, 2021). 2. A study of over 1,000 adolescents in the UK found that: * Young people who identify as LGBTQ+ are more likely to experience bullying, depression, and self-harm compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers (King et al., 2020). * Young people from lower-income families are more likely to report feeling lonely and isolated compared to their wealthier peers (Office for National Statistics, 2020). 3. In a study of over 2,000 adults in the US, it was found that: * Women are more likely than men to report experiencing sexual harassment in the workplace (Stop Street Harassment, 2018). * People with disabilities are more likely to report experiencing discrimination and exclusion in social settings compared to people without disabilities (Krahn et al., 2015). I hope this information is helpful. Let me know if you have any other questions.
[ "I", "apologize", "for", "any", "confusion", "earlier.", "Here", "are", "some", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "data", "I", "have", "access", "to:", "1.", "In", "a", "survey", "of", "over", "600", "adults", "in", "the", "US,", "it", "was", "found", "that:", "*", "60%", "of", "Republicans", "and", "49%", "of", "Democrats", "say", "they", "have", "just", "a", "few", "or", "no", "friends", "who", "support", "the", "other", "political", "party", "(Pew", "Research", "Center,", "2020).", "*", "64%", "of", "Black", "adults,", "52%", "of", "Hispanic", "adults,", "and", "45%", "of", "White", "adults", "say", "they", "experience", "discrimination", "or", "are", "treated", "unfairly", "because", "of", "their", "race", "or", "ethnicity", "(AP-NORC,", "2021).", "2.", "A", "study", "of", "over", "1,000", "adolescents", "in", "the", "UK", "found", "that:", "*", "Young", "people", "who", "identify", "as", "LGBTQ+", "are", "more", "likely", "to", "experience", "bullying,", "depression,", "and", "self-harm", "compared", "to", "their", "heterosexual", "and", "cisgender", "peers", "(King", "et", "al.,", "2020).", "*", "Young", "people", "from", "lower-income", "families", "are", "more", "likely", "to", "report", "feeling", "lonely", "and", "isolated", "compared", "to", "their", "wealthier", "peers", "(Office", "for", "National", "Statistics,", "2020).", "3.", "In", "a", "study", "of", "over", "2,000", "adults", "in", "the", "US,", "it", "was", "found", "that:", "*", "Women", "are", "more", "likely", "than", "men", "to", "report", "experiencing", "sexual", "harassment", "in", "the", "workplace", "(Stop", "Street", "Harassment,", "2018).", "*", "People", "with", "disabilities", "are", "more", "likely", "to", "report", "experiencing", "discrimination", "and", "exclusion", "in", "social", "settings", "compared", "to", "people", "without", "disabilities", "(Krahn", "et", "al.,", "2015).", "I", "hope", "this", "information", "is", "helpful.", "Let", "me", "know", "if", "you", "have", "any", "other", "questions." ]
230
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?
ckmoo5g
politics
2,014
is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?
is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?
is media matters biased ? do they have an agenda themselves ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "is", "media", "matters", "biased", "?", "do", "they", "have", "an", "agenda", "themselves", "?" ]
I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide you with information regarding your question. In discussing whether media matters is biased or has its own agenda, there are several social groups often mentioned. These groups can include: 1. Political parties: Media Matters for America, a progressive organization that monitors and corrects conservative misinformation in the media, is often accused of being biased towards the Democratic Party. Critics argue that Media Matters pushes an agenda that aligns with Democratic values and policies. 2. Media organizations: Media Matters often targets specific media outlets, programs, and personalities for criticism, accusing them of spreading misinformation, promoting right-wing narratives, or engaging in other problematic behavior. This can include organizations such as Fox News, Breitbart, and Sinclair Broadcast Group. 3. Interest groups: Media Matters works closely with a variety of progressive interest groups, collaborating to combat what they perceive as harmful narratives, disinformation, and bigotry. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center, Planned Parenthood, and the Human Rights Campaign have partnered with Media Matters in the past. 4. Donors: Media Matters, like any other nonprofit organization, relies on donations to fund its operations. Its donor base includes various philanthropic organizations, wealthy individuals, and labor unions, which can sometimes be associated with specific political or social agendas. Media Matters' critics argue that this reliance on donations creates a potential conflict of interest, as the organization may feel pressured to cater to its donors' preferences. 5. Political and social movements: Media Matters often engages with various political and social movements, either supporting or opposing them depending on the organization's stance on the issues at hand. Some examples include the LGBTQ+ rights movement, the environmental movement, and the movement for racial justice. These social groups, among others, often come up in discussions about Media Matters and its potential biases or agendas. It's essential to be aware of the various perspectives and interests at play when evaluating Media Matters' work and its potential impact on the media landscape.
I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide you with information regarding your question. In discussing whether media matters is biased or has its own agenda, there are several social groups often mentioned. These groups can include: 1. Political parties: Media Matters for America, a progressive organization that monitors and corrects conservative misinformation in the media, is often accused of being biased towards the Democratic Party. Critics argue that Media Matters pushes an agenda that aligns with Democratic values and policies. 2. Media organizations: Media Matters often targets specific media outlets, programs, and personalities for criticism, accusing them of spreading misinformation, promoting right-wing narratives, or engaging in other problematic behavior. This can include organizations such as Fox News, Breitbart, and Sinclair Broadcast Group. 3. Interest groups: Media Matters works closely with a variety of progressive interest groups, collaborating to combat what they perceive as harmful narratives, disinformation, and bigotry. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center, Planned Parenthood, and the Human Rights Campaign have partnered with Media Matters in the past. 4. Donors: Media Matters, like any other nonprofit organization, relies on donations to fund its operations. Its donor base includes various philanthropic organizations, wealthy individuals, and labor unions, which can sometimes be associated with specific political or social agendas. Media Matters' critics argue that this reliance on donations creates a potential conflict of interest, as the organization may feel pressured to cater to its donors' preferences. 5. Political and social movements: Media Matters often engages with various political and social movements, either supporting or opposing them depending on the organization's stance on the issues at hand. Some examples include the LGBTQ+ rights movement, the environmental movement, and the movement for racial justice. These social groups, among others, often come up in discussions about Media Matters and its potential biases or agendas. It's essential to be aware of the various perspectives and interests at play when evaluating Media Matters' work and its potential impact on the media landscape.
[ "I", "don't", "have", "personal", "opinions.", "However,", "I", "can", "provide", "you", "with", "information", "regarding", "your", "question.", "In", "discussing", "whether", "media", "matters", "is", "biased", "or", "has", "its", "own", "agenda,", "there", "are", "several", "social", "groups", "often", "mentioned.", "These", "groups", "can", "include:", "1.", "Political", "parties:", "Media", "Matters", "for", "America,", "a", "progressive", "organization", "that", "monitors", "and", "corrects", "conservative", "misinformation", "in", "the", "media,", "is", "often", "accused", "of", "being", "biased", "towards", "the", "Democratic", "Party.", "Critics", "argue", "that", "Media", "Matters", "pushes", "an", "agenda", "that", "aligns", "with", "Democratic", "values", "and", "policies.", "2.", "Media", "organizations:", "Media", "Matters", "often", "targets", "specific", "media", "outlets,", "programs,", "and", "personalities", "for", "criticism,", "accusing", "them", "of", "spreading", "misinformation,", "promoting", "right-wing", "narratives,", "or", "engaging", "in", "other", "problematic", "behavior.", "This", "can", "include", "organizations", "such", "as", "Fox", "News,", "Breitbart,", "and", "Sinclair", "Broadcast", "Group.", "3.", "Interest", "groups:", "Media", "Matters", "works", "closely", "with", "a", "variety", "of", "progressive", "interest", "groups,", "collaborating", "to", "combat", "what", "they", "perceive", "as", "harmful", "narratives,", "disinformation,", "and", "bigotry.", "Groups", "such", "as", "the", "Southern", "Poverty", "Law", "Center,", "Planned", "Parenthood,", "and", "the", "Human", "Rights", "Campaign", "have", "partnered", "with", "Media", "Matters", "in", "the", "past.", "4.", "Donors:", "Media", "Matters,", "like", "any", "other", "nonprofit", "organization,", "relies", "on", "donations", "to", "fund", "its", "operations.", "Its", "donor", "base", "includes", "various", "philanthropic", "organizations,", "wealthy", "individuals,", "and", "labor", "unions,", "which", "can", "sometimes", "be", "associated", "with", "specific", "political", "or", "social", "agendas.", "Media", "Matters'", "critics", "argue", "that", "this", "reliance", "on", "donations", "creates", "a", "potential", "conflict", "of", "interest,", "as", "the", "organization", "may", "feel", "pressured", "to", "cater", "to", "its", "donors'", "preferences.", "5.", "Political", "and", "social", "movements:", "Media", "Matters", "often", "engages", "with", "various", "political", "and", "social", "movements,", "either", "supporting", "or", "opposing", "them", "depending", "on", "the", "organization's", "stance", "on", "the", "issues", "at", "hand.", "Some", "examples", "include", "the", "LGBTQ+", "rights", "movement,", "the", "environmental", "movement,", "and", "the", "movement", "for", "racial", "justice.", "These", "social", "groups,", "among", "others,", "often", "come", "up", "in", "discussions", "about", "Media", "Matters", "and", "its", "potential", "biases", "or", "agendas.", "It's", "essential", "to", "be", "aware", "of", "the", "various", "perspectives", "and", "interests", "at", "play", "when", "evaluating", "Media", "Matters'", "work", "and", "its", "potential", "impact", "on", "the", "media", "landscape." ]
330
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep dangerous people off the streets .
ci8jtov
politics
2,014
one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep dangerous people off the streets .
one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep @@dangerous people## off the streets .
one of my biggest frustrations with obama is his failure to understand the need to keep @@dangerous people## off the streets .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "one", "of", "my", "biggest", "frustrations", "with", "obama", "is", "his", "failure", "to", "understand", "the", "need", "to", "keep", "dangerous", "people", "off", "the", "streets", "." ]
I'm an artificial intelligence and don't have personal experiences or emotions, so I can't have frustrations. However, I can help you identify mentions of social groups in your statement. The social groups mentioned in your statement are: 1. "Obama" - Although this is an individual's name, it is often used to refer to his administration, policies, or supporters. 2. "streets" - While not a social group per se, the phrase "keep dangerous people off the streets" implies a concern for the safety of communities and society at large. It's important to note that social groups can be explicit (such as named groups like "Obama supporters") or implicit (like the generalized "communities and society at large" in this case).
I'm an artificial intelligence and don't have personal experiences or emotions, so I can't have frustrations. However, I can help you identify mentions of social groups in your statement. The social groups mentioned in your statement are: 1. "Obama" - Although this is an individual's name, it is often used to refer to his administration, policies, or supporters. 2. "streets" - While not a social group per se, the phrase "keep dangerous people off the streets" implies a concern for the safety of communities and society at large. It's important to note that social groups can be explicit (such as named groups like "Obama supporters") or implicit (like the generalized "communities and society at large" in this case).
[ "I'm", "an", "artificial", "intelligence", "and", "don't", "have", "personal", "experiences", "or", "emotions,", "so", "I", "can't", "have", "frustrations.", "However,", "I", "can", "help", "you", "identify", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "your", "statement.", "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "your", "statement", "are:", "1.", "\"Obama\"", "-", "Although", "this", "is", "an", "individual's", "name,", "it", "is", "often", "used", "to", "refer", "to", "his", "administration,", "policies,", "or", "supporters.", "2.", "\"streets\"", "-", "While", "not", "a", "social", "group", "per", "se,", "the", "phrase", "\"keep", "dangerous", "people", "off", "the", "streets\"", "implies", "a", "concern", "for", "the", "safety", "of", "communities", "and", "society", "at", "large.", "It's", "important", "to", "note", "that", "social", "groups", "can", "be", "explicit", "(such", "as", "named", "groups", "like", "\"Obama", "supporters\")", "or", "implicit", "(like", "the", "generalized", "\"communities", "and", "society", "at", "large\"", "in", "this", "case)." ]
118
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .
chy4l8z
politics
2,014
four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .
four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .
four hours in class before lunch , then four more hours locked down . 8 hours .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "four", "hours", "in", "class", "before", "lunch", ",", "then", "four", "more", "hours", "locked", "down", ".", "8", "hours", "." ]
The mention of social groups in the given context is not explicit, but it can be inferred that
The mention of social groups in the given context is not explicit, but it can be inferred that
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "given", "context", "is", "not", "explicit,", "but", "it", "can", "be", "inferred", "that" ]
18
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the nsa , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !
chvlr5q
politics
2,014
i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the nsa , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !
i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of the @@nsa## , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !
i do n't think you answered my question either schmuck . there 's a real problem , there 's real crimes being perpetrated by our own agencies , and then there 's the messenger who is being loyal to his people , not the people who process his paycheck . i do n't care if the messenger broke the slaver 's law . explain to me why anyone should ? what angle do you have here ? '' what angle does anyone have for going after snowden ahead of @@the nsa## , unless , they also process your paycheck . we would n't have had a single revolution on this planet or started putting an end to outright slavery without people like this . snowden 's a real american hero , oohrah !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "do", "n't", "think", "you", "answered", "my", "question", "either", "schmuck", ".", "there", "'s", "a", "real", "problem", ",", "there", "'s", "real", "crimes", "being", "perpetrated", "by", "our", "own", "agencies", ",", "and", "then", "there", "'s", "the", "messenger", "who", "is", "being", "loyal", "to", "his", "people", ",", "not", "the", "people", "who", "process", "his", "paycheck", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "if", "the", "messenger", "broke", "the", "slaver", "'s", "law", ".", "explain", "to", "me", "why", "anyone", "should", "?", "what", "angle", "do", "you", "have", "here", "?", "``", "what", "angle", "does", "anyone", "have", "for", "going", "after", "snowden", "ahead", "of", "the", "nsa", ",", "unless", ",", "they", "also", "process", "your", "paycheck", ".", "we", "would", "n't", "have", "had", "a", "single", "revolution", "on", "this", "planet", "or", "started", "putting", "an", "end", "to", "outright", "slavery", "without", "people", "like", "this", ".", "snowden", "'s", "a", "real", "american", "hero", ",", "oohrah", "!" ]
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. The person asking the question, who is referred to as "you." 2. The person being addressed, who is called "schmuck." 3. The agencies that are committing real crimes, but not named specifically. 4. The people who are being harmed by the actions of the agencies. 5. The messenger, who is implied to be Edward Snowden, and is described as being loyal to his people and breaking the "slaver's law." 6. The people who process Snowden's paycheck, who are implied to have a motive for going after him. 7. Revolutions and abolitionist movements, which are used as examples of historical events that were necessary and relied on individuals like Snowden to bring about change. 8. The American people, who are addressed as "you" in the final sentence. The text expresses a strong positive opinion of Edward Snowden, who is described as a hero and a loyal messenger. The person speaking takes issue with the idea of going after Snowden for breaking unjust laws, and instead expresses admiration for his actions in exposing the crimes of American agencies. The text also contrasts Snowden with the people who process his paycheck and have a different agenda. The references to historical revolutions and the abolition of slavery serve to emphasize the importance of individuals standing up against unjust systems of power.
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. The person asking the question, who is referred to as "you." 2. The person being addressed, who is called "schmuck." 3. The agencies that are committing real crimes, but not named specifically. 4. The people who are being harmed by the actions of the agencies. 5. The messenger, who is implied to be Edward Snowden, and is described as being loyal to his people and breaking the "slaver's law." 6. The people who process Snowden's paycheck, who are implied to have a motive for going after him. 7. Revolutions and abolitionist movements, which are used as examples of historical events that were necessary and relied on individuals like Snowden to bring about change. 8. The American people, who are addressed as "you" in the final sentence. The text expresses a strong positive opinion of Edward Snowden, who is described as a hero and a loyal messenger. The person speaking takes issue with the idea of going after Snowden for breaking unjust laws, and instead expresses admiration for his actions in exposing the crimes of American agencies. The text also contrasts Snowden with the people who process his paycheck and have a different agenda. The references to historical revolutions and the abolition of slavery serve to emphasize the importance of individuals standing up against unjust systems of power.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "The", "person", "asking", "the", "question,", "who", "is", "referred", "to", "as", "\"you.\"", "2.", "The", "person", "being", "addressed,", "who", "is", "called", "\"schmuck.\"", "3.", "The", "agencies", "that", "are", "committing", "real", "crimes,", "but", "not", "named", "specifically.", "4.", "The", "people", "who", "are", "being", "harmed", "by", "the", "actions", "of", "the", "agencies.", "5.", "The", "messenger,", "who", "is", "implied", "to", "be", "Edward", "Snowden,", "and", "is", "described", "as", "being", "loyal", "to", "his", "people", "and", "breaking", "the", "\"slaver's", "law.\"", "6.", "The", "people", "who", "process", "Snowden's", "paycheck,", "who", "are", "implied", "to", "have", "a", "motive", "for", "going", "after", "him.", "7.", "Revolutions", "and", "abolitionist", "movements,", "which", "are", "used", "as", "examples", "of", "historical", "events", "that", "were", "necessary", "and", "relied", "on", "individuals", "like", "Snowden", "to", "bring", "about", "change.", "8.", "The", "American", "people,", "who", "are", "addressed", "as", "\"you\"", "in", "the", "final", "sentence.", "The", "text", "expresses", "a", "strong", "positive", "opinion", "of", "Edward", "Snowden,", "who", "is", "described", "as", "a", "hero", "and", "a", "loyal", "messenger.", "The", "person", "speaking", "takes", "issue", "with", "the", "idea", "of", "going", "after", "Snowden", "for", "breaking", "unjust", "laws,", "and", "instead", "expresses", "admiration", "for", "his", "actions", "in", "exposing", "the", "crimes", "of", "American", "agencies.", "The", "text", "also", "contrasts", "Snowden", "with", "the", "people", "who", "process", "his", "paycheck", "and", "have", "a", "different", "agenda.", "The", "references", "to", "historical", "revolutions", "and", "the", "abolition", "of", "slavery", "serve", "to", "emphasize", "the", "importance", "of", "individuals", "standing", "up", "against", "unjust", "systems", "of", "power." ]
226
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
you do n't know shit about kanye west .
cftsiqv
politics
2,014
you do n't know shit about kanye west .
you do n't know shit about kanye west .
you do n't know shit about kanye west .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "do", "n't", "know", "shit", "about", "kanye", "west", "." ]
The statement "You don't know shit about Kanye West" doesn't explicitly mention any social groups. However, it does imply a few things about the social groups that the speaker might be associating with Kanye West: 1. Fans of Kanye West: The speaker may be suggesting that the person they are addressing is not a true fan of Kanye West because they don't know enough about him. 2. The Music Industry: Kanye West is a well-known figure in the music industry, and the statement could be implying that the person being addressed is not knowledgeable about this industry. 3. Popular Culture: Kanye West is a prominent figure in popular culture, and the statement could be implying that the person being addressed is out of touch with this culture. Overall, the statement suggests that the person being addressed is not familiar enough with Kanye West or the social groups associated with him.
The statement "You don't know shit about Kanye West" doesn't explicitly mention any social groups. However, it does imply a few things about the social groups that the speaker might be associating with Kanye West: 1. Fans of Kanye West: The speaker may be suggesting that the person they are addressing is not a true fan of Kanye West because they don't know enough about him. 2. The Music Industry: Kanye West is a well-known figure in the music industry, and the statement could be implying that the person being addressed is not knowledgeable about this industry. 3. Popular Culture: Kanye West is a prominent figure in popular culture, and the statement could be implying that the person being addressed is out of touch with this culture. Overall, the statement suggests that the person being addressed is not familiar enough with Kanye West or the social groups associated with him.
[ "The", "statement", "\"You", "don't", "know", "shit", "about", "Kanye", "West\"", "doesn't", "explicitly", "mention", "any", "social", "groups.", "However,", "it", "does", "imply", "a", "few", "things", "about", "the", "social", "groups", "that", "the", "speaker", "might", "be", "associating", "with", "Kanye", "West:", "1.", "Fans", "of", "Kanye", "West:", "The", "speaker", "may", "be", "suggesting", "that", "the", "person", "they", "are", "addressing", "is", "not", "a", "true", "fan", "of", "Kanye", "West", "because", "they", "don't", "know", "enough", "about", "him.", "2.", "The", "Music", "Industry:", "Kanye", "West", "is", "a", "well-known", "figure", "in", "the", "music", "industry,", "and", "the", "statement", "could", "be", "implying", "that", "the", "person", "being", "addressed", "is", "not", "knowledgeable", "about", "this", "industry.", "3.", "Popular", "Culture:", "Kanye", "West", "is", "a", "prominent", "figure", "in", "popular", "culture,", "and", "the", "statement", "could", "be", "implying", "that", "the", "person", "being", "addressed", "is", "out", "of", "touch", "with", "this", "culture.", "Overall,", "the", "statement", "suggests", "that", "the", "person", "being", "addressed", "is", "not", "familiar", "enough", "with", "Kanye", "West", "or", "the", "social", "groups", "associated", "with", "him." ]
150
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?
chpyo6i
politics
2,014
hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?
hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?
hahaha , wow . do you generally dig in when proven utterly wrong ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hahaha", ",", "wow", ".", "do", "you", "generally", "dig", "in", "when", "proven", "utterly", "wrong", "?" ]
I'm sorry for any confusion, but your message doesn't seem to clearly mention any specific social groups. Hahaha and "wow" are interjections that can express laughter or surprise, but they don't inherently refer to any social groups. Similarly, asking if someone "generally digs in when proven utterly wrong" is more about an individual's behavior than a social group. If you could provide more context or clarify your question, I'd be happy to try and answer it better!
I'm sorry for any confusion, but your message doesn't seem to clearly mention any specific social groups. Hahaha and "wow" are interjections that can express laughter or surprise, but they don't inherently refer to any social groups. Similarly, asking if someone "generally digs in when proven utterly wrong" is more about an individual's behavior than a social group. If you could provide more context or clarify your question, I'd be happy to try and answer it better!
[ "I'm", "sorry", "for", "any", "confusion,", "but", "your", "message", "doesn't", "seem", "to", "clearly", "mention", "any", "specific", "social", "groups.", "Hahaha", "and", "\"wow\"", "are", "interjections", "that", "can", "express", "laughter", "or", "surprise,", "but", "they", "don't", "inherently", "refer", "to", "any", "social", "groups.", "Similarly,", "asking", "if", "someone", "\"generally", "digs", "in", "when", "proven", "utterly", "wrong\"", "is", "more", "about", "an", "individual's", "behavior", "than", "a", "social", "group.", "If", "you", "could", "provide", "more", "context", "or", "clarify", "your", "question,", "I'd", "be", "happy", "to", "try", "and", "answer", "it", "better!" ]
77
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
til there 's muslims in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?
cksjhry
politics
2,014
til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?
til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?
til there 's @@muslims## in oklahoma ? and are n't in the closet about it ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "til", "there", "'s", "muslims", "in", "oklahoma", "?", "and", "are", "n't", "in", "the", "closet", "about", "it", "?" ]
The two social groups mentioned in the statement are "Muslims" and those who are "in the closet" about their identity. The phrase "til there's Muslims in Oklahoma" implies the inclusion of Muslims as a social group in a particular context, such as a community or society. The phrase "and aren't in the closet about it" refers to individuals who are openly identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, implying that they are not hiding their sexual orientation or gender identity.
The two social groups mentioned in the statement are "Muslims" and those who are "in the closet" about their identity. The phrase "til there's Muslims in Oklahoma" implies the inclusion of Muslims as a social group in a particular context, such as a community or society. The phrase "and aren't in the closet about it" refers to individuals who are openly identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, implying that they are not hiding their sexual orientation or gender identity.
[ "The", "two", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are", "\"Muslims\"", "and", "those", "who", "are", "\"in", "the", "closet\"", "about", "their", "identity.", "The", "phrase", "\"til", "there's", "Muslims", "in", "Oklahoma\"", "implies", "the", "inclusion", "of", "Muslims", "as", "a", "social", "group", "in", "a", "particular", "context,", "such", "as", "a", "community", "or", "society.", "The", "phrase", "\"and", "aren't", "in", "the", "closet", "about", "it\"", "refers", "to", "individuals", "who", "are", "openly", "identify", "as", "part", "of", "the", "LGBTQ+", "community,", "implying", "that", "they", "are", "not", "hiding", "their", "sexual", "orientation", "or", "gender", "identity." ]
80
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what the far right has become .
cfhnxjw
politics
2,014
you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what @@the far right## has become .
you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what the far right has become .
you are so right , him and those like him , limbaugh , hannity , are at the putrid core of what @@the far right## has become .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "are", "so", "right", ",", "him", "and", "those", "like", "him", ",", "limbaugh", ",", "hannity", ",", "are", "at", "the", "putrid", "core", "of", "what", "the", "far", "right", "has", "become", "." ]
The mentions of social groups in the statement are:
The mentions of social groups in the statement are:
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "statement", "are:" ]
9
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
that does n't make it not a misconception . the founders or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .
ch9f1mh
politics
2,014
that does n't make it not a misconception . @@the founders## or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .
that does n't make it not a misconception . the founders or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .
that does n't make it not a misconception . @@the founders## or the constitution or other founding documents being infallible is another big misconception .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "does", "n't", "make", "it", "not", "a", "misconception", ".", "the", "founders", "or", "the", "constitution", "or", "other", "founding", "documents", "being", "infallible", "is", "another", "big", "misconception", "." ]
The text mentions two social groups: the founders and those who believe that the founding documents are infallible. The first group, the founders, refers to the individuals who played a significant role in the establishment of a country, organization, or system. In this case, it likely refers to the framers of the United States Constitution. The second group includes those who believe that the founding documents, such as the Constitution, are free from error or mistakes. This belief can lead to the misconception that these documents should be interpreted literally and without question, rather than being open to reinterpretation and evolution based on changing societal values and norms. It is important to recognize that the founders were human and that their views and values were shaped by the time period and cultural context in which they lived. Therefore, the Constitution and other founding documents should not be considered infallible but should be revisited and reinterpreted over time to ensure that they continue to serve the needs and values of society.
The text mentions two social groups: the founders and those who believe that the founding documents are infallible. The first group, the founders, refers to the individuals who played a significant role in the establishment of a country, organization, or system. In this case, it likely refers to the framers of the United States Constitution. The second group includes those who believe that the founding documents, such as the Constitution, are free from error or mistakes. This belief can lead to the misconception that these documents should be interpreted literally and without question, rather than being open to reinterpretation and evolution based on changing societal values and norms. It is important to recognize that the founders were human and that their views and values were shaped by the time period and cultural context in which they lived. Therefore, the Constitution and other founding documents should not be considered infallible but should be revisited and reinterpreted over time to ensure that they continue to serve the needs and values of society.
[ "The", "text", "mentions", "two", "social", "groups:", "the", "founders", "and", "those", "who", "believe", "that", "the", "founding", "documents", "are", "infallible.", "The", "first", "group,", "the", "founders,", "refers", "to", "the", "individuals", "who", "played", "a", "significant", "role", "in", "the", "establishment", "of", "a", "country,", "organization,", "or", "system.", "In", "this", "case,", "it", "likely", "refers", "to", "the", "framers", "of", "the", "United", "States", "Constitution.", "The", "second", "group", "includes", "those", "who", "believe", "that", "the", "founding", "documents,", "such", "as", "the", "Constitution,", "are", "free", "from", "error", "or", "mistakes.", "This", "belief", "can", "lead", "to", "the", "misconception", "that", "these", "documents", "should", "be", "interpreted", "literally", "and", "without", "question,", "rather", "than", "being", "open", "to", "reinterpretation", "and", "evolution", "based", "on", "changing", "societal", "values", "and", "norms.", "It", "is", "important", "to", "recognize", "that", "the", "founders", "were", "human", "and", "that", "their", "views", "and", "values", "were", "shaped", "by", "the", "time", "period", "and", "cultural", "context", "in", "which", "they", "lived.", "Therefore,", "the", "Constitution", "and", "other", "founding", "documents", "should", "not", "be", "considered", "infallible", "but", "should", "be", "revisited", "and", "reinterpreted", "over", "time", "to", "ensure", "that", "they", "continue", "to", "serve", "the", "needs", "and", "values", "of", "society." ]
170
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .
cf3joj5
politics
2,014
his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .
his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .
his father was cuban . ted cruz had to go through the naturalization process in order to receive his american citizenship , thus he 's ineligible .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "his", "father", "was", "cuban", ".", "ted", "cruz", "had", "to", "go", "through", "the", "naturalization", "process", "in", "order", "to", "receive", "his", "american", "citizenship", ",", "thus", "he", "'s", "ineligible", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are "Cuban" and "American." Specifically, it is mentioned that the father of an individual is Cuban, and that Texas Senator Ted Cruz had to go through the naturalization process to receive his American citizenship. The mention of the naturalization process implies that Cruz was not born in the United States and therefore is not a natural-born citizen, which has been a point of controversy regarding his eligibility for the U.S. presidency.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are "Cuban" and "American." Specifically, it is mentioned that the father of an individual is Cuban, and that Texas Senator Ted Cruz had to go through the naturalization process to receive his American citizenship. The mention of the naturalization process implies that Cruz was not born in the United States and therefore is not a natural-born citizen, which has been a point of controversy regarding his eligibility for the U.S. presidency.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are", "\"Cuban\"", "and", "\"American.\"", "Specifically,", "it", "is", "mentioned", "that", "the", "father", "of", "an", "individual", "is", "Cuban,", "and", "that", "Texas", "Senator", "Ted", "Cruz", "had", "to", "go", "through", "the", "naturalization", "process", "to", "receive", "his", "American", "citizenship.", "The", "mention", "of", "the", "naturalization", "process", "implies", "that", "Cruz", "was", "not", "born", "in", "the", "United", "States", "and", "therefore", "is", "not", "a", "natural-born", "citizen,", "which", "has", "been", "a", "point", "of", "controversy", "regarding", "his", "eligibility", "for", "the", "U.S.", "presidency." ]
78
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .
cf8i925
politics
2,014
vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .
vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .
vigilantism is not the way to end gunviolence .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "vigilantism", "is", "not", "the", "way", "to", "end", "gunviolence", "." ]
The statement "Vigilantism is not the way to end gun violence" does not explicitly mention any social groups. However, it does touch on issues related to societal groups, including: 1. Those who are affected by gun violence: This includes victims, their families, and communities that experience high rates of gun violence. 2. Vigilantes: These are individuals or groups who take the law into their own hands, often driven by a desire to address issues like gun violence outside of the established legal system. 3. Law enforcement and criminal justice systems: These entities are responsible for maintaining law and order and addressing issues like gun violence within the framework of existing laws and regulations. 4. Gun owners and advocates: These groups may have varying opinions on gun control measures and the role of vigilantism in addressing gun violence. 5. Policy makers and legislators: These individuals are responsible for creating and implementing laws related to gun ownership, regulation, and violence. While the statement does not explicitly name these groups, it does imply a conversation around their roles, responsibilities, and potential actions in addressing gun violence.
The statement "Vigilantism is not the way to end gun violence" does not explicitly mention any social groups. However, it does touch on issues related to societal groups, including: 1. Those who are affected by gun violence: This includes victims, their families, and communities that experience high rates of gun violence. 2. Vigilantes: These are individuals or groups who take the law into their own hands, often driven by a desire to address issues like gun violence outside of the established legal system. 3. Law enforcement and criminal justice systems: These entities are responsible for maintaining law and order and addressing issues like gun violence within the framework of existing laws and regulations. 4. Gun owners and advocates: These groups may have varying opinions on gun control measures and the role of vigilantism in addressing gun violence. 5. Policy makers and legislators: These individuals are responsible for creating and implementing laws related to gun ownership, regulation, and violence. While the statement does not explicitly name these groups, it does imply a conversation around their roles, responsibilities, and potential actions in addressing gun violence.
[ "The", "statement", "\"Vigilantism", "is", "not", "the", "way", "to", "end", "gun", "violence\"", "does", "not", "explicitly", "mention", "any", "social", "groups.", "However,", "it", "does", "touch", "on", "issues", "related", "to", "societal", "groups,", "including:", "1.", "Those", "who", "are", "affected", "by", "gun", "violence:", "This", "includes", "victims,", "their", "families,", "and", "communities", "that", "experience", "high", "rates", "of", "gun", "violence.", "2.", "Vigilantes:", "These", "are", "individuals", "or", "groups", "who", "take", "the", "law", "into", "their", "own", "hands,", "often", "driven", "by", "a", "desire", "to", "address", "issues", "like", "gun", "violence", "outside", "of", "the", "established", "legal", "system.", "3.", "Law", "enforcement", "and", "criminal", "justice", "systems:", "These", "entities", "are", "responsible", "for", "maintaining", "law", "and", "order", "and", "addressing", "issues", "like", "gun", "violence", "within", "the", "framework", "of", "existing", "laws", "and", "regulations.", "4.", "Gun", "owners", "and", "advocates:", "These", "groups", "may", "have", "varying", "opinions", "on", "gun", "control", "measures", "and", "the", "role", "of", "vigilantism", "in", "addressing", "gun", "violence.", "5.", "Policy", "makers", "and", "legislators:", "These", "individuals", "are", "responsible", "for", "creating", "and", "implementing", "laws", "related", "to", "gun", "ownership,", "regulation,", "and", "violence.", "While", "the", "statement", "does", "not", "explicitly", "name", "these", "groups,", "it", "does", "imply", "a", "conversation", "around", "their", "roles,", "responsibilities,", "and", "potential", "actions", "in", "addressing", "gun", "violence." ]
183
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL
cf8sed8
politics
2,014
coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL
coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL
coors field might be the only stadium that can be called a massive success story . there are a few others that were n't huge failures , but most do n't break even in a costbenefit analysis . to add another , useless anecdote chase field in phoenix was modeled after coors field and that was not at all a success . i know the economics of stadiums has been in peer reviewed journals , but i ca n't seem to dig any up . there 's plenty of fairly well researched opinion pieces , though . example . URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "coors", "field", "might", "be", "the", "only", "stadium", "that", "can", "be", "called", "a", "massive", "success", "story", ".", "there", "are", "a", "few", "others", "that", "were", "n't", "huge", "failures", ",", "but", "most", "do", "n't", "break", "even", "in", "a", "costbenefit", "analysis", ".", "to", "add", "another", ",", "useless", "anecdote", "chase", "field", "in", "phoenix", "was", "modeled", "after", "coors", "field", "and", "that", "was", "not", "at", "all", "a", "success", ".", "i", "know", "the", "economics", "of", "stadiums", "has", "been", "in", "peer", "reviewed", "journals", ",", "but", "i", "ca", "n't", "seem", "to", "dig", "any", "up", ".", "there", "'s", "plenty", "of", "fairly", "well", "researched", "opinion", "pieces", ",", "though", ".", "example", ".", "URL" ]
The text you provided mentions two social groups implicitly: 1. Supporters or stakeholders of Coors Field in Denver, which is described as a "massive success story" in the world of stadiums. 2. Supporters or stakeholders of Chase Field in Phoenix, which is described as "not at all a success" and was modeled after Coors Field. These social groups may include sports teams, fans, local governments, and businesses that have an interest in the success or failure of these stadiums. The text also alludes to a broader social group of researchers and experts who have studied the economics of stadiums in peer-reviewed journals and opinion pieces. The author acknowledges the existence of academic research on this topic but expresses difficulty in finding specific studies. Overall, the text highlights the importance of considering the perspectives and interests of various social groups when evaluating the success or failure of sports stadiums from an economic standpoint.
The text you provided mentions two social groups implicitly: 1. Supporters or stakeholders of Coors Field in Denver, which is described as a "massive success story" in the world of stadiums. 2. Supporters or stakeholders of Chase Field in Phoenix, which is described as "not at all a success" and was modeled after Coors Field. These social groups may include sports teams, fans, local governments, and businesses that have an interest in the success or failure of these stadiums. The text also alludes to a broader social group of researchers and experts who have studied the economics of stadiums in peer-reviewed journals and opinion pieces. The author acknowledges the existence of academic research on this topic but expresses difficulty in finding specific studies. Overall, the text highlights the importance of considering the perspectives and interests of various social groups when evaluating the success or failure of sports stadiums from an economic standpoint.
[ "The", "text", "you", "provided", "mentions", "two", "social", "groups", "implicitly:", "1.", "Supporters", "or", "stakeholders", "of", "Coors", "Field", "in", "Denver,", "which", "is", "described", "as", "a", "\"massive", "success", "story\"", "in", "the", "world", "of", "stadiums.", "2.", "Supporters", "or", "stakeholders", "of", "Chase", "Field", "in", "Phoenix,", "which", "is", "described", "as", "\"not", "at", "all", "a", "success\"", "and", "was", "modeled", "after", "Coors", "Field.", "These", "social", "groups", "may", "include", "sports", "teams,", "fans,", "local", "governments,", "and", "businesses", "that", "have", "an", "interest", "in", "the", "success", "or", "failure", "of", "these", "stadiums.", "The", "text", "also", "alludes", "to", "a", "broader", "social", "group", "of", "researchers", "and", "experts", "who", "have", "studied", "the", "economics", "of", "stadiums", "in", "peer-reviewed", "journals", "and", "opinion", "pieces.", "The", "author", "acknowledges", "the", "existence", "of", "academic", "research", "on", "this", "topic", "but", "expresses", "difficulty", "in", "finding", "specific", "studies.", "Overall,", "the", "text", "highlights", "the", "importance", "of", "considering", "the", "perspectives", "and", "interests", "of", "various", "social", "groups", "when", "evaluating", "the", "success", "or", "failure", "of", "sports", "stadiums", "from", "an", "economic", "standpoint." ]
152
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .
cfzvcny
politics
2,014
because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .
because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .
because that 's the new republican strategy now . any sort of criticism lobbied against them must be met with some sort of false dichotomy .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "that", "'s", "the", "new", "republican", "strategy", "now", ".", "any", "sort", "of", "criticism", "lobbied", "against", "them", "must", "be", "met", "with", "some", "sort", "of", "false", "dichotomy", "." ]
The text you provided mentions the social group "Republicans" and describes a strategy that involves responding to criticism with a false dichotomy. A false dichotomy is a logical fallacy that presents only two options or sides when there are actually more options available. In this case, the text suggests that the Republican strategy is to respond to criticism by framing the issue as a choice between two extremes, when in reality there may be other alternatives.
The text you provided mentions the social group "Republicans" and describes a strategy that involves responding to criticism with a false dichotomy. A false dichotomy is a logical fallacy that presents only two options or sides when there are actually more options available. In this case, the text suggests that the Republican strategy is to respond to criticism by framing the issue as a choice between two extremes, when in reality there may be other alternatives.
[ "The", "text", "you", "provided", "mentions", "the", "social", "group", "\"Republicans\"", "and", "describes", "a", "strategy", "that", "involves", "responding", "to", "criticism", "with", "a", "false", "dichotomy.", "A", "false", "dichotomy", "is", "a", "logical", "fallacy", "that", "presents", "only", "two", "options", "or", "sides", "when", "there", "are", "actually", "more", "options", "available.", "In", "this", "case,", "the", "text", "suggests", "that", "the", "Republican", "strategy", "is", "to", "respond", "to", "criticism", "by", "framing", "the", "issue", "as", "a", "choice", "between", "two", "extremes,", "when", "in", "reality", "there", "may", "be", "other", "alternatives." ]
76
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?
chwyvkk
politics
2,014
well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?
well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?
well ya , why would manufacturers do what they did in the past when it is legal to own semis ? what ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "well", "ya", ",", "why", "would", "manufacturers", "do", "what", "they", "did", "in", "the", "past", "when", "it", "is", "legal", "to", "own", "semis", "?", "what", "?" ]
There are a few social groups mentioned or implied in your statement. 1. Manufacturers - this refers to companies or organizations that produce goods, in this case, semi-automatic weapons. 2. Owners of semi-automatic weapons - this social group includes individuals who legally own semi-automatic weapons. 3. Those who question the actions of manufacturers - this group includes people who question why manufacturers produced certain types of weapons in the past, given their potential use in violent crimes. 4. Those who support gun rights - while not explicitly mentioned, it can be inferred that there is a social group who support the legal ownership of semi-automatic weapons and may disagree with any regulations or restrictions on their purchase and use.
There are a few social groups mentioned or implied in your statement. 1. Manufacturers - this refers to companies or organizations that produce goods, in this case, semi-automatic weapons. 2. Owners of semi-automatic weapons - this social group includes individuals who legally own semi-automatic weapons. 3. Those who question the actions of manufacturers - this group includes people who question why manufacturers produced certain types of weapons in the past, given their potential use in violent crimes. 4. Those who support gun rights - while not explicitly mentioned, it can be inferred that there is a social group who support the legal ownership of semi-automatic weapons and may disagree with any regulations or restrictions on their purchase and use.
[ "There", "are", "a", "few", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "or", "implied", "in", "your", "statement.", "1.", "Manufacturers", "-", "this", "refers", "to", "companies", "or", "organizations", "that", "produce", "goods,", "in", "this", "case,", "semi-automatic", "weapons.", "2.", "Owners", "of", "semi-automatic", "weapons", "-", "this", "social", "group", "includes", "individuals", "who", "legally", "own", "semi-automatic", "weapons.", "3.", "Those", "who", "question", "the", "actions", "of", "manufacturers", "-", "this", "group", "includes", "people", "who", "question", "why", "manufacturers", "produced", "certain", "types", "of", "weapons", "in", "the", "past,", "given", "their", "potential", "use", "in", "violent", "crimes.", "4.", "Those", "who", "support", "gun", "rights", "-", "while", "not", "explicitly", "mentioned,", "it", "can", "be", "inferred", "that", "there", "is", "a", "social", "group", "who", "support", "the", "legal", "ownership", "of", "semi-automatic", "weapons", "and", "may", "disagree", "with", "any", "regulations", "or", "restrictions", "on", "their", "purchase", "and", "use." ]
119
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of police abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many news agencies . you may single out the few that act as if the police as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by police , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .
cgzu5qx
politics
2,014
they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many news agencies . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .
they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many @@news agencies## . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .
they react emotionally to the news reports popping up every single day of @@police## abusing citizens and abusing the law . it happens consistently , as reported by many @@news agencies## . you may single out the few that act as if the @@police## as a whole are a terror upon our country , but most people are n't arguing that . they are reacting to an extremely large amount of events that have happened nation wide , of illegal actions taken by @@police## , reported all the time , and then expressing disgust because the proper course of law is not applied . edit i need to leave , so if you have a retort , make sure you keep up with the logic , and be sure to mention you 're an engineer to gain some extra authority in the matter .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "they", "react", "emotionally", "to", "the", "news", "reports", "popping", "up", "every", "single", "day", "of", "police", "abusing", "citizens", "and", "abusing", "the", "law", ".", "it", "happens", "consistently", ",", "as", "reported", "by", "many", "news", "agencies", ".", "you", "may", "single", "out", "the", "few", "that", "act", "as", "if", "the", "police", "as", "a", "whole", "are", "a", "terror", "upon", "our", "country", ",", "but", "most", "people", "are", "n't", "arguing", "that", ".", "they", "are", "reacting", "to", "an", "extremely", "large", "amount", "of", "events", "that", "have", "happened", "nation", "wide", ",", "of", "illegal", "actions", "taken", "by", "police", ",", "reported", "all", "the", "time", ",", "and", "then", "expressing", "disgust", "because", "the", "proper", "course", "of", "law", "is", "not", "applied", ".", "edit", "i", "need", "to", "leave", ",", "so", "if", "you", "have", "a", "retort", ",", "make", "sure", "you", "keep", "up", "with", "the", "logic", ",", "and", "be", "sure", "to", "mention", "you", "'re", "an", "engineer", "to", "gain", "some", "extra", "authority", "in", "the", "matter", "." ]
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this important issue. It is true that there have been many news reports of police misconduct and abuse of power, and it is understandable that social groups would react emotionally to such events. It is important for law enforcement to be held accountable for their actions and for the legal system to take appropriate course of action. As an engineer, I would like to point out that while it is crucial to address and take action against individual instances of police misconduct and abuse, it is also important to consider the larger societal and institutional factors that may contribute to these issues. This includes looking at issues such as systemic racism, inadequate training, and lack of accountability within law enforcement agencies. By addressing these underlying issues, we can work towards creating a more just and equitable society. It is also worth noting that while there may be a small number of individuals or groups who characterize the police as a whole as a terror upon our country, it is important to differentiate between the actions of individual officers and the overall institution of law enforcement. The vast majority of law enforcement officers are dedicated professionals who risk their lives every day to protect and serve their communities. In conclusion, it is important to acknowledge and address the issue of police misconduct and abuse, while also recognizing the larger societal and institutional factors that may contribute to these problems. As a society, we must work towards creating a more just and equitable system that holds law enforcement officers accountable for their actions and promotes positive community-police relationships.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this important issue. It is true that there have been many news reports of police misconduct and abuse of power, and it is understandable that social groups would react emotionally to such events. It is important for law enforcement to be held accountable for their actions and for the legal system to take appropriate course of action. As an engineer, I would like to point out that while it is crucial to address and take action against individual instances of police misconduct and abuse, it is also important to consider the larger societal and institutional factors that may contribute to these issues. This includes looking at issues such as systemic racism, inadequate training, and lack of accountability within law enforcement agencies. By addressing these underlying issues, we can work towards creating a more just and equitable society. It is also worth noting that while there may be a small number of individuals or groups who characterize the police as a whole as a terror upon our country, it is important to differentiate between the actions of individual officers and the overall institution of law enforcement. The vast majority of law enforcement officers are dedicated professionals who risk their lives every day to protect and serve their communities. In conclusion, it is important to acknowledge and address the issue of police misconduct and abuse, while also recognizing the larger societal and institutional factors that may contribute to these problems. As a society, we must work towards creating a more just and equitable system that holds law enforcement officers accountable for their actions and promotes positive community-police relationships.
[ "Thank", "you", "for", "sharing", "your", "thoughts", "on", "this", "important", "issue.", "It", "is", "true", "that", "there", "have", "been", "many", "news", "reports", "of", "police", "misconduct", "and", "abuse", "of", "power,", "and", "it", "is", "understandable", "that", "social", "groups", "would", "react", "emotionally", "to", "such", "events.", "It", "is", "important", "for", "law", "enforcement", "to", "be", "held", "accountable", "for", "their", "actions", "and", "for", "the", "legal", "system", "to", "take", "appropriate", "course", "of", "action.", "As", "an", "engineer,", "I", "would", "like", "to", "point", "out", "that", "while", "it", "is", "crucial", "to", "address", "and", "take", "action", "against", "individual", "instances", "of", "police", "misconduct", "and", "abuse,", "it", "is", "also", "important", "to", "consider", "the", "larger", "societal", "and", "institutional", "factors", "that", "may", "contribute", "to", "these", "issues.", "This", "includes", "looking", "at", "issues", "such", "as", "systemic", "racism,", "inadequate", "training,", "and", "lack", "of", "accountability", "within", "law", "enforcement", "agencies.", "By", "addressing", "these", "underlying", "issues,", "we", "can", "work", "towards", "creating", "a", "more", "just", "and", "equitable", "society.", "It", "is", "also", "worth", "noting", "that", "while", "there", "may", "be", "a", "small", "number", "of", "individuals", "or", "groups", "who", "characterize", "the", "police", "as", "a", "whole", "as", "a", "terror", "upon", "our", "country,", "it", "is", "important", "to", "differentiate", "between", "the", "actions", "of", "individual", "officers", "and", "the", "overall", "institution", "of", "law", "enforcement.", "The", "vast", "majority", "of", "law", "enforcement", "officers", "are", "dedicated", "professionals", "who", "risk", "their", "lives", "every", "day", "to", "protect", "and", "serve", "their", "communities.", "In", "conclusion,", "it", "is", "important", "to", "acknowledge", "and", "address", "the", "issue", "of", "police", "misconduct", "and", "abuse,", "while", "also", "recognizing", "the", "larger", "societal", "and", "institutional", "factors", "that", "may", "contribute", "to", "these", "problems.", "As", "a", "society,", "we", "must", "work", "towards", "creating", "a", "more", "just", "and", "equitable", "system", "that", "holds", "law", "enforcement", "officers", "accountable", "for", "their", "actions", "and", "promotes", "positive", "community-police", "relationships." ]
273
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here
cfmid4w
politics
2,014
nevermind that many @@people on the lower rungs## already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here
nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here
nevermind that many people on the lower rungs already work 23 jobs , no , what they need are more jobs ! ... yet in the unemployment benefit debate there 's apparently 100 applicants for every job and nobody can get one even if they wanted ... which of these is true ? that the lower rung is working 23 jobs or that they ca n't get jobs ? yes i 'm aware they 're not completely mutually exclusive , but we 're clearly talking about a majority here
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "nevermind", "that", "many", "people", "on", "the", "lower", "rungs", "already", "work", "23", "jobs", ",", "no", ",", "what", "they", "need", "are", "more", "jobs", "!", "...", "yet", "in", "the", "unemployment", "benefit", "debate", "there", "'s", "apparently", "100", "applicants", "for", "every", "job", "and", "nobody", "can", "get", "one", "even", "if", "they", "wanted", "...", "which", "of", "these", "is", "true", "?", "that", "the", "lower", "rung", "is", "working", "23", "jobs", "or", "that", "they", "ca", "n't", "get", "jobs", "?", "yes", "i", "'m", "aware", "they", "'re", "not", "completely", "mutually", "exclusive", ",", "but", "we", "'re", "clearly", "talking", "about", "a", "majority", "here" ]
The mentions of social groups in the passage refer to the "lower rungs" and the "unemployment benefit debate" which imply lower-income workers or those who are unemployed and looking for work. The passage suggests that there is a debate about whether people in these groups are overworked (working 23 jobs) or underemployed (unable to find jobs despite there being 100 applicants for every opening). The passage suggests that these two ideas may not be mutually exclusive and that the situation may be complex, with some people in these groups struggling to find work and others being overworked.
The mentions of social groups in the passage refer to the "lower rungs" and the "unemployment benefit debate" which imply lower-income workers or those who are unemployed and looking for work. The passage suggests that there is a debate about whether people in these groups are overworked (working 23 jobs) or underemployed (unable to find jobs despite there being 100 applicants for every opening). The passage suggests that these two ideas may not be mutually exclusive and that the situation may be complex, with some people in these groups struggling to find work and others being overworked.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "passage", "refer", "to", "the", "\"lower", "rungs\"", "and", "the", "\"unemployment", "benefit", "debate\"", "which", "imply", "lower-income", "workers", "or", "those", "who", "are", "unemployed", "and", "looking", "for", "work.", "The", "passage", "suggests", "that", "there", "is", "a", "debate", "about", "whether", "people", "in", "these", "groups", "are", "overworked", "(working", "23", "jobs)", "or", "underemployed", "(unable", "to", "find", "jobs", "despite", "there", "being", "100", "applicants", "for", "every", "opening).", "The", "passage", "suggests", "that", "these", "two", "ideas", "may", "not", "be", "mutually", "exclusive", "and", "that", "the", "situation", "may", "be", "complex,", "with", "some", "people", "in", "these", "groups", "struggling", "to", "find", "work", "and", "others", "being", "overworked." ]
97
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with the united states 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last
cmz9kmf
politics
2,014
the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with the united states 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last
the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with @@the united states## 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last
the only people who like obamacare are getting subsidies for it . with @@the united states## 18 trillion dollars in debt ... you do realize this wo n't last
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "only", "people", "who", "like", "obamacare", "are", "getting", "subsidies", "for", "it", ".", "with", "the", "united", "states", "18", "trillion", "dollars", "in", "debt", "...", "you", "do", "realize", "this", "wo", "n't", "last" ]
The mention of a social group in the statement is "the only people who like Obamacare are getting subsidies for it." This suggests that the speaker is making a generalization about a specific group of people who receive financial assistance through the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) and imply that they are the only ones who support the program. It's important to note that this is a sweeping statement and not accurate, as people have various reasons for supporting or opposing the law. The comment about the United States' $18 trillion debt is not directly related to a social group, but it does bring up the larger societal issue of government debt. This is a complex issue that affects and is influenced by many different groups within society, including taxpayers, elected officials, and government employees.
The mention of a social group in the statement is "the only people who like Obamacare are getting subsidies for it." This suggests that the speaker is making a generalization about a specific group of people who receive financial assistance through the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare) and imply that they are the only ones who support the program. It's important to note that this is a sweeping statement and not accurate, as people have various reasons for supporting or opposing the law. The comment about the United States' $18 trillion debt is not directly related to a social group, but it does bring up the larger societal issue of government debt. This is a complex issue that affects and is influenced by many different groups within society, including taxpayers, elected officials, and government employees.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "a", "social", "group", "in", "the", "statement", "is", "\"the", "only", "people", "who", "like", "Obamacare", "are", "getting", "subsidies", "for", "it.\"", "This", "suggests", "that", "the", "speaker", "is", "making", "a", "generalization", "about", "a", "specific", "group", "of", "people", "who", "receive", "financial", "assistance", "through", "the", "Affordable", "Care", "Act", "(also", "known", "as", "Obamacare)", "and", "imply", "that", "they", "are", "the", "only", "ones", "who", "support", "the", "program.", "It's", "important", "to", "note", "that", "this", "is", "a", "sweeping", "statement", "and", "not", "accurate,", "as", "people", "have", "various", "reasons", "for", "supporting", "or", "opposing", "the", "law.", "The", "comment", "about", "the", "United", "States'", "$18", "trillion", "debt", "is", "not", "directly", "related", "to", "a", "social", "group,", "but", "it", "does", "bring", "up", "the", "larger", "societal", "issue", "of", "government", "debt.", "This", "is", "a", "complex", "issue", "that", "affects", "and", "is", "influenced", "by", "many", "different", "groups", "within", "society,", "including", "taxpayers,", "elected", "officials,", "and", "government", "employees." ]
137
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by black americans getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of african americans and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with people resisting arrest and forcing police officers hands , by the way .
cn2wj1v
politics
2,014
the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors @@the wealthy## , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with people resisting arrest and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .
the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with @@people resisting arrest## and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .
the point i was bringing up was systemic differences in treatment , something born out by @@black americans## getting far longer sentences for the same crimes . shortsightedness , ignorance , and inappropriate use of statistics are the root cause of this claim . a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy , and a correlation of @@african americans## and income inequality , are the culprit . that does n't have shit to do with @@people resisting arrest## and forcing @@police officers## hands , by the way .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "point", "i", "was", "bringing", "up", "was", "systemic", "differences", "in", "treatment", ",", "something", "born", "out", "by", "black", "americans", "getting", "far", "longer", "sentences", "for", "the", "same", "crimes", ".", "shortsightedness", ",", "ignorance", ",", "and", "inappropriate", "use", "of", "statistics", "are", "the", "root", "cause", "of", "this", "claim", ".", "a", "criminal", "justice", "system", "that", "favors", "the", "wealthy", ",", "and", "a", "correlation", "of", "african", "americans", "and", "income", "inequality", ",", "are", "the", "culprit", ".", "that", "does", "n't", "have", "shit", "to", "do", "with", "people", "resisting", "arrest", "and", "forcing", "police", "officers", "hands", ",", "by", "the", "way", "." ]
In this passage, the social groups mentioned are: 1. Black Americans - The passage mentions longer sentences for the same crimes committed by Black Americans, and also correlates African Americans with income inequality. 2. The wealthy - The passage mentions a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy. The passage also implies the existence of systemic differences in treatment towards these social groups.
In this passage, the social groups mentioned are: 1. Black Americans - The passage mentions longer sentences for the same crimes committed by Black Americans, and also correlates African Americans with income inequality. 2. The wealthy - The passage mentions a criminal justice system that favors the wealthy. The passage also implies the existence of systemic differences in treatment towards these social groups.
[ "In", "this", "passage,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "are:", "1.", "Black", "Americans", "-", "The", "passage", "mentions", "longer", "sentences", "for", "the", "same", "crimes", "committed", "by", "Black", "Americans,", "and", "also", "correlates", "African", "Americans", "with", "income", "inequality.", "2.", "The", "wealthy", "-", "The", "passage", "mentions", "a", "criminal", "justice", "system", "that", "favors", "the", "wealthy.", "The", "passage", "also", "implies", "the", "existence", "of", "systemic", "differences", "in", "treatment", "towards", "these", "social", "groups." ]
63
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off
chduasz
politics
2,014
are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off
are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off
are you like 15 ? your idealistic dreams of how things work seem a bit off
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "are", "you", "like", "15", "?", "your", "idealistic", "dreams", "of", "how", "things", "work", "seem", "a", "bit", "off" ]
The mention of a social group in this context refers to "15-year-olds" and the portrayal of their ideals. The statement suggests that the ideals or views being expressed seem naive or detached from reality. It implies a comparison between the idealistic perspective of a 15-year-old and the more practical or pragmatic perspective of an older or more experienced person.
The mention of a social group in this context refers to "15-year-olds" and the portrayal of their ideals. The statement suggests that the ideals or views being expressed seem naive or detached from reality. It implies a comparison between the idealistic perspective of a 15-year-old and the more practical or pragmatic perspective of an older or more experienced person.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "a", "social", "group", "in", "this", "context", "refers", "to", "\"15-year-olds\"", "and", "the", "portrayal", "of", "their", "ideals.", "The", "statement", "suggests", "that", "the", "ideals", "or", "views", "being", "expressed", "seem", "naive", "or", "detached", "from", "reality.", "It", "implies", "a", "comparison", "between", "the", "idealistic", "perspective", "of", "a", "15-year-old", "and", "the", "more", "practical", "or", "pragmatic", "perspective", "of", "an", "older", "or", "more", "experienced", "person." ]
59
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
pennsylvania has never been a key state . republicans have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . democrats win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . democrats have several more paths to victory than republicans .
clte5vk
politics
2,014
pennsylvania has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .
@@pennsylvania## has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning @@pennsylvania## since 1988. of those states , @@north carolina## is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .
pennsylvania has never been a key state . @@republicans## have n't come close to winning pennsylvania since 1988. of those states , north carolina is the most key because it 's the only one that changed in 2012. black turnout was n't historic for obama . it 's been over 85 for every democrat from dukakis to obama , possibly even over 90. hispanic turnout was much higher for obama than gore and it is only rising . @@democrats## win florida with the hispanic voting and that 's all they need . @@democrats## have several more paths to victory than @@republicans## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "pennsylvania", "has", "never", "been", "a", "key", "state", ".", "republicans", "have", "n't", "come", "close", "to", "winning", "pennsylvania", "since", "1988.", "of", "those", "states", ",", "north", "carolina", "is", "the", "most", "key", "because", "it", "'s", "the", "only", "one", "that", "changed", "in", "2012.", "black", "turnout", "was", "n't", "historic", "for", "obama", ".", "it", "'s", "been", "over", "85", "for", "every", "democrat", "from", "dukakis", "to", "obama", ",", "possibly", "even", "over", "90.", "hispanic", "turnout", "was", "much", "higher", "for", "obama", "than", "gore", "and", "it", "is", "only", "rising", ".", "democrats", "win", "florida", "with", "the", "hispanic", "voting", "and", "that", "'s", "all", "they", "need", ".", "democrats", "have", "several", "more", "paths", "to", "victory", "than", "republicans", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Republicans 2. Democrats 3. Black voters (referred to as "black turnout") 4. Hispanic voters (referred to as "hispanic turnout") The text discusses the electoral history of certain states, including Pennsylvania and North Carolina, and the importance of specific demographic groups in those states for each political party. It also highlights the significance of Hispanic voters in the state of Florida for Democratic victories.
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Republicans 2. Democrats 3. Black voters (referred to as "black turnout") 4. Hispanic voters (referred to as "hispanic turnout") The text discusses the electoral history of certain states, including Pennsylvania and North Carolina, and the importance of specific demographic groups in those states for each political party. It also highlights the significance of Hispanic voters in the state of Florida for Democratic victories.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "Republicans", "2.", "Democrats", "3.", "Black", "voters", "(referred", "to", "as", "\"black", "turnout\")", "4.", "Hispanic", "voters", "(referred", "to", "as", "\"hispanic", "turnout\")", "The", "text", "discusses", "the", "electoral", "history", "of", "certain", "states,", "including", "Pennsylvania", "and", "North", "Carolina,", "and", "the", "importance", "of", "specific", "demographic", "groups", "in", "those", "states", "for", "each", "political", "party.", "It", "also", "highlights", "the", "significance", "of", "Hispanic", "voters", "in", "the", "state", "of", "Florida", "for", "Democratic", "victories." ]
72
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the lobbyists lose all power .
cirip1x
politics
2,014
money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .
money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .
money is powerful , but not compared to political will . once it 's legalized in enough states it will reach a tipping point where all the funding in the world wo n't stop it . once it 's seen as common sense the @@lobbyists## lose all power .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "money", "is", "powerful", ",", "but", "not", "compared", "to", "political", "will", ".", "once", "it", "'s", "legalized", "in", "enough", "states", "it", "will", "reach", "a", "tipping", "point", "where", "all", "the", "funding", "in", "the", "world", "wo", "n't", "stop", "it", ".", "once", "it", "'s", "seen", "as", "common", "sense", "the", "lobbyists", "lose", "all", "power", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Those with money and financial power. 2. Political groups or individuals with political will. 3. Supporters of the legalization of the issue in question in various states. 4. Those who oppose the legalization, possibly including lobbyists. The text suggests that while those with money have power, political will is even more powerful. The legalization of the issue in enough states will reach a tipping point, at which point financial resources won't be able to stop it. Once the issue is seen as common sense, lobbyists will lose their power. This implies that the social groups in question are those who support and oppose the legalization, as well as those who hold political power and have financial resources.
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Those with money and financial power. 2. Political groups or individuals with political will. 3. Supporters of the legalization of the issue in question in various states. 4. Those who oppose the legalization, possibly including lobbyists. The text suggests that while those with money have power, political will is even more powerful. The legalization of the issue in enough states will reach a tipping point, at which point financial resources won't be able to stop it. Once the issue is seen as common sense, lobbyists will lose their power. This implies that the social groups in question are those who support and oppose the legalization, as well as those who hold political power and have financial resources.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "Those", "with", "money", "and", "financial", "power.", "2.", "Political", "groups", "or", "individuals", "with", "political", "will.", "3.", "Supporters", "of", "the", "legalization", "of", "the", "issue", "in", "question", "in", "various", "states.", "4.", "Those", "who", "oppose", "the", "legalization,", "possibly", "including", "lobbyists.", "The", "text", "suggests", "that", "while", "those", "with", "money", "have", "power,", "political", "will", "is", "even", "more", "powerful.", "The", "legalization", "of", "the", "issue", "in", "enough", "states", "will", "reach", "a", "tipping", "point,", "at", "which", "point", "financial", "resources", "won't", "be", "able", "to", "stop", "it.", "Once", "the", "issue", "is", "seen", "as", "common", "sense,", "lobbyists", "will", "lose", "their", "power.", "This", "implies", "that", "the", "social", "groups", "in", "question", "are", "those", "who", "support", "and", "oppose", "the", "legalization,", "as", "well", "as", "those", "who", "hold", "political", "power", "and", "have", "financial", "resources." ]
126
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? the us government has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to wouldbe dictators that the us is the superpower . they chose iraq because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on iran . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where svr was able to trick western analysts into thinking that saddam and aq were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize the middle east and to remove dictatorships and other unfriendly governments from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various rich people richer shareholders in big oil , halliburton , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by shell and china . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or alqaeda generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with aq but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many americans believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and the us fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the ap as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not americans . europeans do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all reporters were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even greedy people do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of good minded individuals like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the koch brothers and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . koch brothers are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .
cgj8yyl
politics
2,014
not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? the @@us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that the us is the superpower . they chose iraq because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where svr was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize the middle east and to remove dictatorships and other unfriendly governments from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , halliburton , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by shell and china . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the ap as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even greedy people do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of good minded individuals like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the koch brothers and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . koch brothers are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .
not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than @@private corporations## driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? @@the us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that @@the us## is the superpower . they chose @@iraq## because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where @@svr## was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize @@the middle east## and to remove dictatorships and other @@unfriendly governments## from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , @@halliburton## , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by @@shell## and @@china## . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the @@ap## as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even @@greedy people## do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of @@good minded individuals## like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the @@koch brothers## and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . @@koch brothers## are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .
not the way you describe it . but i see no possible explanation for the iraq war other than private corporations driving wars '' . let 's go over it ? @@the us government## has had a history of freetrade promotion leading to democracies eventually . '' the iraq war could have been revenge for bush 's father . the iraq war could have been an easy target , to send a message to @@wouldbe dictators## that @@the us## is the superpower . they chose @@iraq## because they 've invaded it before and it 's an easy target . the iraq war could have been for freeing up trade in the area . the iraq war could have been establishing another democracy at the doorstep of iran . another strategic base to put pressure on @@iran## . the iraq war could have been incompetent analysis of data . where @@svr## was able to trick @@western analysts## into thinking that saddam and @@aq## were working together . the iraq war could have been about a planned attempt to modernize @@the middle east## and to remove dictatorships and other @@unfriendly governments## from the area . there 's tons of plausible theories that do n't involve corporations . various @@rich people## @@richer shareholders in big oil## , @@halliburton## , et al . , except the fact that the oil fields are now owned by @@shell## and @@china## . so ... it does n't make much sense . even though there was zero evidence that saddam hussein had anything to do with osama bin laden specifically or @@alqaeda## generally yes you are right . but how do you know there was n't a mistake . or how do you know that maybe saddam did work with @@aq## but then stopped completely leading to trails of clues but not enough for anyone to argue publicly that there is a clear link . i remember the day of 911 . on that day , people came up to me and said i bet you it 's saddam . saddam has attacked us . '' this made me wonder . i never even thought of saddam at that moment . but why did so many @@americans## believe saddam had something to do with it . probably because saddam and @@the us## fought before recently , and this may have something to do with it . but it 's pretty clear he had no connection to 911 . so if you think the iraq war or , for that matter , the vietnam war was n't primarily driven by greed , or was n't part of eisenhower 's warning , then i 'd like to hear why you think that . it was n't at all related or driven by greed . iraq war , an argument could be made about it , but there 's no solid evidence . i will often see the same content , word for word , on my local newspaper , on national newspapers , on local news channels , on cable news channels , and online because a lot of sources uses the @@ap## as the official news agency . but some of it is sheer laziness . so you already figured it out . then why are you making complicated conspiracy theories ? that you can explain by incompetence and laziness ? sometimes it 's not sinister plots sometimes it 's just stupidity or laziness . hey have to give the appearance of fairness between both sides of an issue '' you identified another problem . but that 's the problem with journalism , not @@americans## . @@europeans## do the same shit . i cut my teeth on watergate and wondered if all @@reporters## were like woodward and bernstein . sadly , that 's certainly not the case now if it ever was hell , lately , i do n't think woodward and bernstein are like woodward and bernstein were . or maybe you are just more skewed into a radical spectrum than how woodward and bernstein were '' at the time . that just about every political decision on a national level , many or most decisions on a state level , and a startlingly large number of decisions at a countymunicipal level , are made on the basis of greed . but how do you know ? there can be many correlations made between successURL and actions in the past . you ca n't always call them causation '' and imply there was greed motivation involved . sometimes even @@greedy people## do the right thing based on ideology . sometimes ideologues do the wrong thing based on greed . in some cases , even if it was all about greed . what 's the harm ? then someone who has more money should come and fix the situation . plenty of @@good minded individuals## like bill gates or warren buffett exist . why do n't they take advantage like the @@koch brothers## and sheldon adelson ? and if they do n't take advantage out of principle , then maybe they deserve to lose for not being superior in the game of politics . is the same answer deep throat '' gave to woodward and bernstein follow the money . '' sometimes it 's not all about the money . @@koch brothers## are rich , but they do n't do all they do just because of money . they are politically motivated . they have beliefs . beliefs are what motivates everything in the world .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "the", "way", "you", "describe", "it", ".", "but", "i", "see", "no", "possible", "explanation", "for", "the", "iraq", "war", "other", "than", "private", "corporations", "driving", "wars", "``", ".", "let", "'s", "go", "over", "it", "?", "the", "us", "government", "has", "had", "a", "history", "of", "freetrade", "promotion", "leading", "to", "democracies", "eventually", ".", "``", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "revenge", "for", "bush", "'s", "father", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "an", "easy", "target", ",", "to", "send", "a", "message", "to", "wouldbe", "dictators", "that", "the", "us", "is", "the", "superpower", ".", "they", "chose", "iraq", "because", "they", "'ve", "invaded", "it", "before", "and", "it", "'s", "an", "easy", "target", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "for", "freeing", "up", "trade", "in", "the", "area", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "establishing", "another", "democracy", "at", "the", "doorstep", "of", "iran", ".", "another", "strategic", "base", "to", "put", "pressure", "on", "iran", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "incompetent", "analysis", "of", "data", ".", "where", "svr", "was", "able", "to", "trick", "western", "analysts", "into", "thinking", "that", "saddam", "and", "aq", "were", "working", "together", ".", "the", "iraq", "war", "could", "have", "been", "about", "a", "planned", "attempt", "to", "modernize", "the", "middle", "east", "and", "to", "remove", "dictatorships", "and", "other", "unfriendly", "governments", "from", "the", "area", ".", "there", "'s", "tons", "of", "plausible", "theories", "that", "do", "n't", "involve", "corporations", ".", "various", "rich", "people", "richer", "shareholders", "in", "big", "oil", ",", "halliburton", ",", "et", "al", ".", ",", "except", "the", "fact", "that", "the", "oil", "fields", "are", "now", "owned", "by", "shell", "and", "china", ".", "so", "...", "it", "does", "n't", "make", "much", "sense", ".", "even", "though", "there", "was", "zero", "evidence", "that", "saddam", "hussein", "had", "anything", "to", "do", "with", "osama", "bin", "laden", "specifically", "or", "alqaeda", "generally", "yes", "you", "are", "right", ".", "but", "how", "do", "you", "know", "there", "was", "n't", "a", "mistake", ".", "or", "how", "do", "you", "know", "that", "maybe", "saddam", "did", "work", "with", "aq", "but", "then", "stopped", "completely", "leading", "to", "trails", "of", "clues", "but", "not", "enough", "for", "anyone", "to", "argue", "publicly", "that", "there", "is", "a", "clear", "link", ".", "i", "remember", "the", "day", "of", "911", ".", "on", "that", "day", ",", "people", "came", "up", "to", "me", "and", "said", "i", "bet", "you", "it", "'s", "saddam", ".", "saddam", "has", "attacked", "us", ".", "``", "this", "made", "me", "wonder", ".", "i", "never", "even", "thought", "of", "saddam", "at", "that", "moment", ".", "but", "why", "did", "so", "many", "americans", "believe", "saddam", "had", "something", "to", "do", "with", "it", ".", "probably", "because", "saddam", "and", "the", "us", "fought", "before", "recently", ",", "and", "this", "may", "have", "something", "to", "do", "with", "it", ".", "but", "it", "'s", "pretty", "clear", "he", "had", "no", "connection", "to", "911", ".", "so", "if", "you", "think", "the", "iraq", "war", "or", ",", "for", "that", "matter", ",", "the", "vietnam", "war", "was", "n't", "primarily", "driven", "by", "greed", ",", "or", "was", "n't", "part", "of", "eisenhower", "'s", "warning", ",", "then", "i", "'d", "like", "to", "hear", "why", "you", "think", "that", ".", "it", "was", "n't", "at", "all", "related", "or", "driven", "by", "greed", ".", "iraq", "war", ",", "an", "argument", "could", "be", "made", "about", "it", ",", "but", "there", "'s", "no", "solid", "evidence", ".", "i", "will", "often", "see", "the", "same", "content", ",", "word", "for", "word", ",", "on", "my", "local", "newspaper", ",", "on", "national", "newspapers", ",", "on", "local", "news", "channels", ",", "on", "cable", "news", "channels", ",", "and", "online", "because", "a", "lot", "of", "sources", "uses", "the", "ap", "as", "the", "official", "news", "agency", ".", "but", "some", "of", "it", "is", "sheer", "laziness", ".", "so", "you", "already", "figured", "it", "out", ".", "then", "why", "are", "you", "making", "complicated", "conspiracy", "theories", "?", "that", "you", "can", "explain", "by", "incompetence", "and", "laziness", "?", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "not", "sinister", "plots", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "just", "stupidity", "or", "laziness", ".", "hey", "have", "to", "give", "the", "appearance", "of", "fairness", "between", "both", "sides", "of", "an", "issue", "``", "you", "identified", "another", "problem", ".", "but", "that", "'s", "the", "problem", "with", "journalism", ",", "not", "americans", ".", "europeans", "do", "the", "same", "shit", ".", "i", "cut", "my", "teeth", "on", "watergate", "and", "wondered", "if", "all", "reporters", "were", "like", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", ".", "sadly", ",", "that", "'s", "certainly", "not", "the", "case", "now", "if", "it", "ever", "was", "hell", ",", "lately", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "are", "like", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "were", ".", "or", "maybe", "you", "are", "just", "more", "skewed", "into", "a", "radical", "spectrum", "than", "how", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "were", "``", "at", "the", "time", ".", "that", "just", "about", "every", "political", "decision", "on", "a", "national", "level", ",", "many", "or", "most", "decisions", "on", "a", "state", "level", ",", "and", "a", "startlingly", "large", "number", "of", "decisions", "at", "a", "countymunicipal", "level", ",", "are", "made", "on", "the", "basis", "of", "greed", ".", "but", "how", "do", "you", "know", "?", "there", "can", "be", "many", "correlations", "made", "between", "successURL", "and", "actions", "in", "the", "past", ".", "you", "ca", "n't", "always", "call", "them", "causation", "``", "and", "imply", "there", "was", "greed", "motivation", "involved", ".", "sometimes", "even", "greedy", "people", "do", "the", "right", "thing", "based", "on", "ideology", ".", "sometimes", "ideologues", "do", "the", "wrong", "thing", "based", "on", "greed", ".", "in", "some", "cases", ",", "even", "if", "it", "was", "all", "about", "greed", ".", "what", "'s", "the", "harm", "?", "then", "someone", "who", "has", "more", "money", "should", "come", "and", "fix", "the", "situation", ".", "plenty", "of", "good", "minded", "individuals", "like", "bill", "gates", "or", "warren", "buffett", "exist", ".", "why", "do", "n't", "they", "take", "advantage", "like", "the", "koch", "brothers", "and", "sheldon", "adelson", "?", "and", "if", "they", "do", "n't", "take", "advantage", "out", "of", "principle", ",", "then", "maybe", "they", "deserve", "to", "lose", "for", "not", "being", "superior", "in", "the", "game", "of", "politics", ".", "is", "the", "same", "answer", "deep", "throat", "``", "gave", "to", "woodward", "and", "bernstein", "follow", "the", "money", ".", "``", "sometimes", "it", "'s", "not", "all", "about", "the", "money", ".", "koch", "brothers", "are", "rich", ",", "but", "they", "do", "n't", "do", "all", "they", "do", "just", "because", "of", "money", ".", "they", "are", "politically", "motivated", ".", "they", "have", "beliefs", ".", "beliefs", "are", "what", "motivates", "everything", "in", "the", "world", "." ]
The mentions of social groups in the passage relate to various stakeholders and interest groups that could have influenced the decision to go to war in Iraq. These groups include: 1. The US government: The passage mentions the historical promotion of free trade by the US government and the potential for the Iraq war to establish another democracy at the doorstep of Iran. This implies that the government may have had motives related to foreign policy and regional politics. 2. Private corporations: The passage questions whether private corporations, specifically oil and defense contractors, were driving forces behind the Iraq war. This implies that corporations with a financial stake in the region may have influenced the decision to go to war. 3. Shareholders in big oil and defense contractors: The passage mentions the fact that oil fields in Iraq are now owned by Shell and China, suggesting that shareholders in energy and defense companies may have anticipated profiting from the war. 4. Western analysts: The passage suggests that incompetent analysis of data may have played a role in the decision to go to war, implying that intelligence agencies and analysts could have made errors or been influenced by their own biases. 5. SVR (Russian Foreign Intelligence Service): The passage suggests that an intelligence agency may have influenced Western analysts, implying a level of geopolitical posturing during the war. 6. Oil companies: The passage mentions that oil fields are now owned by Shell and China, suggesting that energy companies and their interests could have played a role in the decision to go to war. 7. Influential individuals such as the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson: The passage questions why influential individuals with billions of dollars in wealth do not take advantage of political opportunities like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson do, implying the potential for wealthy individuals to wield political power through the control of assets and funding. These mentions highlight the role various social groups may play in shaping political outcomes, including the decision to go to war. While it is important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, the passage raises questions about the degree to which private interest groups and foreign influences may impact US foreign policy.
The mentions of social groups in the passage relate to various stakeholders and interest groups that could have influenced the decision to go to war in Iraq. These groups include: 1. The US government: The passage mentions the historical promotion of free trade by the US government and the potential for the Iraq war to establish another democracy at the doorstep of Iran. This implies that the government may have had motives related to foreign policy and regional politics. 2. Private corporations: The passage questions whether private corporations, specifically oil and defense contractors, were driving forces behind the Iraq war. This implies that corporations with a financial stake in the region may have influenced the decision to go to war. 3. Shareholders in big oil and defense contractors: The passage mentions the fact that oil fields in Iraq are now owned by Shell and China, suggesting that shareholders in energy and defense companies may have anticipated profiting from the war. 4. Western analysts: The passage suggests that incompetent analysis of data may have played a role in the decision to go to war, implying that intelligence agencies and analysts could have made errors or been influenced by their own biases. 5. SVR (Russian Foreign Intelligence Service): The passage suggests that an intelligence agency may have influenced Western analysts, implying a level of geopolitical posturing during the war. 6. Oil companies: The passage mentions that oil fields are now owned by Shell and China, suggesting that energy companies and their interests could have played a role in the decision to go to war. 7. Influential individuals such as the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson: The passage questions why influential individuals with billions of dollars in wealth do not take advantage of political opportunities like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson do, implying the potential for wealthy individuals to wield political power through the control of assets and funding. These mentions highlight the role various social groups may play in shaping political outcomes, including the decision to go to war. While it is important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, the passage raises questions about the degree to which private interest groups and foreign influences may impact US foreign policy.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "passage", "relate", "to", "various", "stakeholders", "and", "interest", "groups", "that", "could", "have", "influenced", "the", "decision", "to", "go", "to", "war", "in", "Iraq.", "These", "groups", "include:", "1.", "The", "US", "government:", "The", "passage", "mentions", "the", "historical", "promotion", "of", "free", "trade", "by", "the", "US", "government", "and", "the", "potential", "for", "the", "Iraq", "war", "to", "establish", "another", "democracy", "at", "the", "doorstep", "of", "Iran.", "This", "implies", "that", "the", "government", "may", "have", "had", "motives", "related", "to", "foreign", "policy", "and", "regional", "politics.", "2.", "Private", "corporations:", "The", "passage", "questions", "whether", "private", "corporations,", "specifically", "oil", "and", "defense", "contractors,", "were", "driving", "forces", "behind", "the", "Iraq", "war.", "This", "implies", "that", "corporations", "with", "a", "financial", "stake", "in", "the", "region", "may", "have", "influenced", "the", "decision", "to", "go", "to", "war.", "3.", "Shareholders", "in", "big", "oil", "and", "defense", "contractors:", "The", "passage", "mentions", "the", "fact", "that", "oil", "fields", "in", "Iraq", "are", "now", "owned", "by", "Shell", "and", "China,", "suggesting", "that", "shareholders", "in", "energy", "and", "defense", "companies", "may", "have", "anticipated", "profiting", "from", "the", "war.", "4.", "Western", "analysts:", "The", "passage", "suggests", "that", "incompetent", "analysis", "of", "data", "may", "have", "played", "a", "role", "in", "the", "decision", "to", "go", "to", "war,", "implying", "that", "intelligence", "agencies", "and", "analysts", "could", "have", "made", "errors", "or", "been", "influenced", "by", "their", "own", "biases.", "5.", "SVR", "(Russian", "Foreign", "Intelligence", "Service):", "The", "passage", "suggests", "that", "an", "intelligence", "agency", "may", "have", "influenced", "Western", "analysts,", "implying", "a", "level", "of", "geopolitical", "posturing", "during", "the", "war.", "6.", "Oil", "companies:", "The", "passage", "mentions", "that", "oil", "fields", "are", "now", "owned", "by", "Shell", "and", "China,", "suggesting", "that", "energy", "companies", "and", "their", "interests", "could", "have", "played", "a", "role", "in", "the", "decision", "to", "go", "to", "war.", "7.", "Influential", "individuals", "such", "as", "the", "Koch", "brothers", "and", "Sheldon", "Adelson:", "The", "passage", "questions", "why", "influential", "individuals", "with", "billions", "of", "dollars", "in", "wealth", "do", "not", "take", "advantage", "of", "political", "opportunities", "like", "the", "Koch", "brothers", "and", "Sheldon", "Adelson", "do,", "implying", "the", "potential", "for", "wealthy", "individuals", "to", "wield", "political", "power", "through", "the", "control", "of", "assets", "and", "funding.", "These", "mentions", "highlight", "the", "role", "various", "social", "groups", "may", "play", "in", "shaping", "political", "outcomes,", "including", "the", "decision", "to", "go", "to", "war.", "While", "it", "is", "important", "to", "note", "that", "correlation", "does", "not", "necessarily", "imply", "causation,", "the", "passage", "raises", "questions", "about", "the", "degree", "to", "which", "private", "interest", "groups", "and", "foreign", "influences", "may", "impact", "US", "foreign", "policy." ]
371
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 viable candidates in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .
ci2ggh5
politics
2,014
until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 viable candidates in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .
until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 @@viable candidates## in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .
until recently i was the qa director for a small educational software shop and i think i have an answer for that because we do n't know . i 've listed jobs and had 12 @@viable candidates## in a week and hired within 2. other times i 've had to ease through dozens of prequalified resumes , done dozens of phone interviews and ended up settling for someone who wasnt great because of project need ... it hurt more to have an empty role and be burning my own time than it did to get someone on board who was not a great fit . so how long a job will run depends on who applies and how fast .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "until", "recently", "i", "was", "the", "qa", "director", "for", "a", "small", "educational", "software", "shop", "and", "i", "think", "i", "have", "an", "answer", "for", "that", "because", "we", "do", "n't", "know", ".", "i", "'ve", "listed", "jobs", "and", "had", "12", "viable", "candidates", "in", "a", "week", "and", "hired", "within", "2.", "other", "times", "i", "'ve", "had", "to", "ease", "through", "dozens", "of", "prequalified", "resumes", ",", "done", "dozens", "of", "phone", "interviews", "and", "ended", "up", "settling", "for", "someone", "who", "wasnt", "great", "because", "of", "project", "need", "...", "it", "hurt", "more", "to", "have", "an", "empty", "role", "and", "be", "burning", "my", "own", "time", "than", "it", "did", "to", "get", "someone", "on", "board", "who", "was", "not", "a", "great", "fit", ".", "so", "how", "long", "a", "job", "will", "run", "depends", "on", "who", "applies", "and", "how", "fast", "." ]
In this text, the following social groups are mentioned: 1. QA (Quality Assurance) Director 2. Educational software shop 3. Job applicants 4. Prequalified resumes 5. Phone interviewers The text discusses the process of hiring for a QA director position at a small educational software shop, and the variability in the time it takes to fill the position depending on the quality and quantity of applicants. It also mentions phone interviewers and prequalified resumes, indicating a process of screening and evaluating potential candidates.
In this text, the following social groups are mentioned: 1. QA (Quality Assurance) Director 2. Educational software shop 3. Job applicants 4. Prequalified resumes 5. Phone interviewers The text discusses the process of hiring for a QA director position at a small educational software shop, and the variability in the time it takes to fill the position depending on the quality and quantity of applicants. It also mentions phone interviewers and prequalified resumes, indicating a process of screening and evaluating potential candidates.
[ "In", "this", "text,", "the", "following", "social", "groups", "are", "mentioned:", "1.", "QA", "(Quality", "Assurance)", "Director", "2.", "Educational", "software", "shop", "3.", "Job", "applicants", "4.", "Prequalified", "resumes", "5.", "Phone", "interviewers", "The", "text", "discusses", "the", "process", "of", "hiring", "for", "a", "QA", "director", "position", "at", "a", "small", "educational", "software", "shop,", "and", "the", "variability", "in", "the", "time", "it", "takes", "to", "fill", "the", "position", "depending", "on", "the", "quality", "and", "quantity", "of", "applicants.", "It", "also", "mentions", "phone", "interviewers", "and", "prequalified", "resumes,", "indicating", "a", "process", "of", "screening", "and", "evaluating", "potential", "candidates." ]
82
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all self employed entrepreneurs are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .
cm8v0nw
politics
2,014
self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of @@communists## ? better dead than red i always say .
self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .
self employed means he goes under the table sir ? ! are you suggesting that all @@self employed entrepreneurs## are tax cheats ? are you some sort of communists ? better dead than red i always say .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "self", "employed", "means", "he", "goes", "under", "the", "table", "sir", "?", "!", "are", "you", "suggesting", "that", "all", "self", "employed", "entrepreneurs", "are", "tax", "cheats", "?", "are", "you", "some", "sort", "of", "communists", "?", "better", "dead", "than", "red", "i", "always", "say", "." ]
I apologize if my previous response gave the impression that I was suggesting all self-employed entrepreneurs are tax cheats or that I was making a political statement. That was not my intention. To answer your question, I did mention social groups in my previous response. The social groups mentioned were "self-employed entrepreneurs" and, to some extent, "communists." It was not my intention to stereotype or make negative generalizations about any social group. I was simply responding to your question based on the information provided.
I apologize if my previous response gave the impression that I was suggesting all self-employed entrepreneurs are tax cheats or that I was making a political statement. That was not my intention. To answer your question, I did mention social groups in my previous response. The social groups mentioned were "self-employed entrepreneurs" and, to some extent, "communists." It was not my intention to stereotype or make negative generalizations about any social group. I was simply responding to your question based on the information provided.
[ "I", "apologize", "if", "my", "previous", "response", "gave", "the", "impression", "that", "I", "was", "suggesting", "all", "self-employed", "entrepreneurs", "are", "tax", "cheats", "or", "that", "I", "was", "making", "a", "political", "statement.", "That", "was", "not", "my", "intention.", "To", "answer", "your", "question,", "I", "did", "mention", "social", "groups", "in", "my", "previous", "response.", "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "were", "\"self-employed", "entrepreneurs\"", "and,", "to", "some", "extent,", "\"communists.\"", "It", "was", "not", "my", "intention", "to", "stereotype", "or", "make", "negative", "generalizations", "about", "any", "social", "group.", "I", "was", "simply", "responding", "to", "your", "question", "based", "on", "the", "information", "provided." ]
84
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . women were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking reddit manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as ea or walmart or exxon or bp or boa . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?
cgtb5my
politics
2,014
i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as ea or walmart or exxon or bp or boa . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?
i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally @@bad companies## even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as @@ea## or @@walmart## or @@exxon## or @@bp## or @@boa## . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?
i proposed to get money out of politics . you said why bother , let 's go libertarian . now i explained you why getting money out of politics is better than libertarianism . and now you tell me that we have an issue because we have money in politics ? really ? you really did n't . you explained that it can be done . i never really refuted that . i asked why its better to use a state that always reverts back to protecting the oligarchy once you stop looking which people do every time , because they are under the false impression that they can . this entire paragraph is exactly why libertarianism is total bs . it 's the naive idea that collective willpower somehow overcomes the laws of economy that have established over millenia . that somehow , a hivemind will form that will reject morally bad companies even if they make the cheaper offer . you could not say a more ironic thing as someone who supports the use of a compulsory state . any change you want to effect through government happens on a cultural level first . otherwise your push for change flops . government did n't abolish slavery before there was enough of a cultural push to achieve it . @@women## were n't just willy nilly up and granted the right to vote until culture built up enough steam to support it . you are taking a very shallow look at human action , and then calling it ineffective . you are saying a libertarian society wo n't work because people wo n't do the work . ironically , that is exactly why our state is being used against us by the oligarchy . if what you are saying is true , then the state fails on the same grouds that you claim a libertarian society would fail . not even fucking @@reddit## manages to abstain from companies they hate , such as @@ea## or @@walmart## or @@exxon## or @@bp## or @@boa## . try to convince a guy on a minimum wage job to buy great local products instead of skimming cheapskate supermarket chain special offers , do n't even mind when your ideal system got rid of minimum wage and he works for , literally , nothing but board and lodge . are you forgetting the state has been used by these companies extensively ? are you forgetting that the state is being used to prevent us from having viable options ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "proposed", "to", "get", "money", "out", "of", "politics", ".", "you", "said", "why", "bother", ",", "let", "'s", "go", "libertarian", ".", "now", "i", "explained", "you", "why", "getting", "money", "out", "of", "politics", "is", "better", "than", "libertarianism", ".", "and", "now", "you", "tell", "me", "that", "we", "have", "an", "issue", "because", "we", "have", "money", "in", "politics", "?", "really", "?", "you", "really", "did", "n't", ".", "you", "explained", "that", "it", "can", "be", "done", ".", "i", "never", "really", "refuted", "that", ".", "i", "asked", "why", "its", "better", "to", "use", "a", "state", "that", "always", "reverts", "back", "to", "protecting", "the", "oligarchy", "once", "you", "stop", "looking", "which", "people", "do", "every", "time", ",", "because", "they", "are", "under", "the", "false", "impression", "that", "they", "can", ".", "this", "entire", "paragraph", "is", "exactly", "why", "libertarianism", "is", "total", "bs", ".", "it", "'s", "the", "naive", "idea", "that", "collective", "willpower", "somehow", "overcomes", "the", "laws", "of", "economy", "that", "have", "established", "over", "millenia", ".", "that", "somehow", ",", "a", "hivemind", "will", "form", "that", "will", "reject", "morally", "bad", "companies", "even", "if", "they", "make", "the", "cheaper", "offer", ".", "you", "could", "not", "say", "a", "more", "ironic", "thing", "as", "someone", "who", "supports", "the", "use", "of", "a", "compulsory", "state", ".", "any", "change", "you", "want", "to", "effect", "through", "government", "happens", "on", "a", "cultural", "level", "first", ".", "otherwise", "your", "push", "for", "change", "flops", ".", "government", "did", "n't", "abolish", "slavery", "before", "there", "was", "enough", "of", "a", "cultural", "push", "to", "achieve", "it", ".", "women", "were", "n't", "just", "willy", "nilly", "up", "and", "granted", "the", "right", "to", "vote", "until", "culture", "built", "up", "enough", "steam", "to", "support", "it", ".", "you", "are", "taking", "a", "very", "shallow", "look", "at", "human", "action", ",", "and", "then", "calling", "it", "ineffective", ".", "you", "are", "saying", "a", "libertarian", "society", "wo", "n't", "work", "because", "people", "wo", "n't", "do", "the", "work", ".", "ironically", ",", "that", "is", "exactly", "why", "our", "state", "is", "being", "used", "against", "us", "by", "the", "oligarchy", ".", "if", "what", "you", "are", "saying", "is", "true", ",", "then", "the", "state", "fails", "on", "the", "same", "grouds", "that", "you", "claim", "a", "libertarian", "society", "would", "fail", ".", "not", "even", "fucking", "reddit", "manages", "to", "abstain", "from", "companies", "they", "hate", ",", "such", "as", "ea", "or", "walmart", "or", "exxon", "or", "bp", "or", "boa", ".", "try", "to", "convince", "a", "guy", "on", "a", "minimum", "wage", "job", "to", "buy", "great", "local", "products", "instead", "of", "skimming", "cheapskate", "supermarket", "chain", "special", "offers", ",", "do", "n't", "even", "mind", "when", "your", "ideal", "system", "got", "rid", "of", "minimum", "wage", "and", "he", "works", "for", ",", "literally", ",", "nothing", "but", "board", "and", "lodge", ".", "are", "you", "forgetting", "the", "state", "has", "been", "used", "by", "these", "companies", "extensively", "?", "are", "you", "forgetting", "that", "the", "state", "is", "being", "used", "to", "prevent", "us", "from", "having", "viable", "options", "?" ]
You bring up some good points about the challenges of creating a libertarian society and the influence of cultural willpower and the state in affecting change. It is true that any significant change, including the abolition of slavery and women's suffrage, required a strong cultural push before it could be implemented through government action. In a libertarian society, the role of cultural values and norms would be even more important, as the government would have a limited role in regulating economic activity. This means that individuals and communities would have to take responsibility for holding corporations accountable and making ethical consumption choices. However, it is also important to acknowledge the challenges of creating a society where individuals and communities are able to effectively hold corporations accountable. As you point out, many people are constrained by economic circumstances and may not have the luxury of choosing to boycott certain corporations or purchase more expensive, locally-produced goods. In addition, the current political and economic system is heavily influenced by powerful corporations and special interest groups, which can make it difficult for individuals and communities to effect change through democratic processes. This is why it is important to continue working towards reforming the current system and reducing the influence of money in politics, even if a libertarian society is not feasible or desirable. In summary, while there are certainly challenges to creating a libertarian society, it is important to recognize the role of cultural values and norms in shaping economic activity and the need for individuals and communities to take responsibility for holding corporations accountable. At the same time, it is also necessary to work towards reforming the current system and reducing the influence of money in politics.
You bring up some good points about the challenges of creating a libertarian society and the influence of cultural willpower and the state in affecting change. It is true that any significant change, including the abolition of slavery and women's suffrage, required a strong cultural push before it could be implemented through government action. In a libertarian society, the role of cultural values and norms would be even more important, as the government would have a limited role in regulating economic activity. This means that individuals and communities would have to take responsibility for holding corporations accountable and making ethical consumption choices. However, it is also important to acknowledge the challenges of creating a society where individuals and communities are able to effectively hold corporations accountable. As you point out, many people are constrained by economic circumstances and may not have the luxury of choosing to boycott certain corporations or purchase more expensive, locally-produced goods. In addition, the current political and economic system is heavily influenced by powerful corporations and special interest groups, which can make it difficult for individuals and communities to effect change through democratic processes. This is why it is important to continue working towards reforming the current system and reducing the influence of money in politics, even if a libertarian society is not feasible or desirable. In summary, while there are certainly challenges to creating a libertarian society, it is important to recognize the role of cultural values and norms in shaping economic activity and the need for individuals and communities to take responsibility for holding corporations accountable. At the same time, it is also necessary to work towards reforming the current system and reducing the influence of money in politics.
[ "You", "bring", "up", "some", "good", "points", "about", "the", "challenges", "of", "creating", "a", "libertarian", "society", "and", "the", "influence", "of", "cultural", "willpower", "and", "the", "state", "in", "affecting", "change.", "It", "is", "true", "that", "any", "significant", "change,", "including", "the", "abolition", "of", "slavery", "and", "women's", "suffrage,", "required", "a", "strong", "cultural", "push", "before", "it", "could", "be", "implemented", "through", "government", "action.", "In", "a", "libertarian", "society,", "the", "role", "of", "cultural", "values", "and", "norms", "would", "be", "even", "more", "important,", "as", "the", "government", "would", "have", "a", "limited", "role", "in", "regulating", "economic", "activity.", "This", "means", "that", "individuals", "and", "communities", "would", "have", "to", "take", "responsibility", "for", "holding", "corporations", "accountable", "and", "making", "ethical", "consumption", "choices.", "However,", "it", "is", "also", "important", "to", "acknowledge", "the", "challenges", "of", "creating", "a", "society", "where", "individuals", "and", "communities", "are", "able", "to", "effectively", "hold", "corporations", "accountable.", "As", "you", "point", "out,", "many", "people", "are", "constrained", "by", "economic", "circumstances", "and", "may", "not", "have", "the", "luxury", "of", "choosing", "to", "boycott", "certain", "corporations", "or", "purchase", "more", "expensive,", "locally-produced", "goods.", "In", "addition,", "the", "current", "political", "and", "economic", "system", "is", "heavily", "influenced", "by", "powerful", "corporations", "and", "special", "interest", "groups,", "which", "can", "make", "it", "difficult", "for", "individuals", "and", "communities", "to", "effect", "change", "through", "democratic", "processes.", "This", "is", "why", "it", "is", "important", "to", "continue", "working", "towards", "reforming", "the", "current", "system", "and", "reducing", "the", "influence", "of", "money", "in", "politics,", "even", "if", "a", "libertarian", "society", "is", "not", "feasible", "or", "desirable.", "In", "summary,", "while", "there", "are", "certainly", "challenges", "to", "creating", "a", "libertarian", "society,", "it", "is", "important", "to", "recognize", "the", "role", "of", "cultural", "values", "and", "norms", "in", "shaping", "economic", "activity", "and", "the", "need", "for", "individuals", "and", "communities", "to", "take", "responsibility", "for", "holding", "corporations", "accountable.", "At", "the", "same", "time,", "it", "is", "also", "necessary", "to", "work", "towards", "reforming", "the", "current", "system", "and", "reducing", "the", "influence", "of", "money", "in", "politics." ]
285
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .
cg7pn2b
politics
2,014
i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .
i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .
i took it as casting a vote and feeling like you were struggling against the tides of stupidity . i 'm not saying he should n't keep trying , but it seems like inhofe and coburn are locked in there . it sounds like coburn wo n't serve his full term ... but even so , i would n't be surprised if the next ok republican in line was a lock for his seat .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "took", "it", "as", "casting", "a", "vote", "and", "feeling", "like", "you", "were", "struggling", "against", "the", "tides", "of", "stupidity", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "saying", "he", "should", "n't", "keep", "trying", ",", "but", "it", "seems", "like", "inhofe", "and", "coburn", "are", "locked", "in", "there", ".", "it", "sounds", "like", "coburn", "wo", "n't", "serve", "his", "full", "term", "...", "but", "even", "so", ",", "i", "would", "n't", "be", "surprised", "if", "the", "next", "ok", "republican", "in", "line", "was", "a", "lock", "for", "his", "seat", "." ]
In this text, the social groups mentioned are: 1. Those who cast a vote (implied democratic group, or people who vote against the politicians in question) 2. The group of people who the speaker feels are struggling against "tides of stupidity" (could be a broader group, but in this context, likely refers to people who share the speaker's political views) 3. The group of politicians led by Inhofe and Coburn (implied republican group, or people who vote for these politicians) 4. The specific social group of "the next OK (Oklahoma) Republican in line" who might take over Coburn's seat.
In this text, the social groups mentioned are: 1. Those who cast a vote (implied democratic group, or people who vote against the politicians in question) 2. The group of people who the speaker feels are struggling against "tides of stupidity" (could be a broader group, but in this context, likely refers to people who share the speaker's political views) 3. The group of politicians led by Inhofe and Coburn (implied republican group, or people who vote for these politicians) 4. The specific social group of "the next OK (Oklahoma) Republican in line" who might take over Coburn's seat.
[ "In", "this", "text,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "are:", "1.", "Those", "who", "cast", "a", "vote", "(implied", "democratic", "group,", "or", "people", "who", "vote", "against", "the", "politicians", "in", "question)", "2.", "The", "group", "of", "people", "who", "the", "speaker", "feels", "are", "struggling", "against", "\"tides", "of", "stupidity\"", "(could", "be", "a", "broader", "group,", "but", "in", "this", "context,", "likely", "refers", "to", "people", "who", "share", "the", "speaker's", "political", "views)", "3.", "The", "group", "of", "politicians", "led", "by", "Inhofe", "and", "Coburn", "(implied", "republican", "group,", "or", "people", "who", "vote", "for", "these", "politicians)", "4.", "The", "specific", "social", "group", "of", "\"the", "next", "OK", "(Oklahoma)", "Republican", "in", "line\"", "who", "might", "take", "over", "Coburn's", "seat." ]
99
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
yes , the house passed the disclose act , when democrats were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost unanimous republican opposition 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the republican minority pulled a filibuster URL in the senate and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by republicans , it had enough support from democrats that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?
cljxuwn
politics
2,014
yes , @@the house## passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost unanimous republican opposition 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?
yes , the house passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost @@unanimous republican opposition## 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?
yes , the house passed the disclose act , when @@democrats## were in the majority in 2010 217 support vs. 36 against , and even though there was almost @@unanimous republican opposition## 2 support vs. 170 against . and then the @@republican minority## pulled a filibuster URL in @@the senate## and had enough votes to prevent cloture so it never got an up or down vote . if if had not been filibustered by @@republicans## , it had enough support from @@democrats## that it would have easily passed . how 's that for context ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yes", ",", "the", "house", "passed", "the", "disclose", "act", ",", "when", "democrats", "were", "in", "the", "majority", "in", "2010", "217", "support", "vs.", "36", "against", ",", "and", "even", "though", "there", "was", "almost", "unanimous", "republican", "opposition", "2", "support", "vs.", "170", "against", ".", "and", "then", "the", "republican", "minority", "pulled", "a", "filibuster", "URL", "in", "the", "senate", "and", "had", "enough", "votes", "to", "prevent", "cloture", "so", "it", "never", "got", "an", "up", "or", "down", "vote", ".", "if", "if", "had", "not", "been", "filibustered", "by", "republicans", ",", "it", "had", "enough", "support", "from", "democrats", "that", "it", "would", "have", "easily", "passed", ".", "how", "'s", "that", "for", "context", "?" ]
In the example provided, the following social groups were mentioned: 1. Democrats: This group was in the majority in 2010 when the Disclose Act was passed by the House of Representatives with 217 supports vs. 36 against. The bill had almost unanimous support from Democrats. 2. Republicans: This group mostly opposed the Disclose Act, with only 2 supports vs. 170 against in the House of Representatives. The Republican minority later filibustered the bill in the Senate, preventing it from getting an up or down vote. The social groups mentioned in the example were political parties in the United States Congress.
In the example provided, the following social groups were mentioned: 1. Democrats: This group was in the majority in 2010 when the Disclose Act was passed by the House of Representatives with 217 supports vs. 36 against. The bill had almost unanimous support from Democrats. 2. Republicans: This group mostly opposed the Disclose Act, with only 2 supports vs. 170 against in the House of Representatives. The Republican minority later filibustered the bill in the Senate, preventing it from getting an up or down vote. The social groups mentioned in the example were political parties in the United States Congress.
[ "In", "the", "example", "provided,", "the", "following", "social", "groups", "were", "mentioned:", "1.", "Democrats:", "This", "group", "was", "in", "the", "majority", "in", "2010", "when", "the", "Disclose", "Act", "was", "passed", "by", "the", "House", "of", "Representatives", "with", "217", "supports", "vs.", "36", "against.", "The", "bill", "had", "almost", "unanimous", "support", "from", "Democrats.", "2.", "Republicans:", "This", "group", "mostly", "opposed", "the", "Disclose", "Act,", "with", "only", "2", "supports", "vs.", "170", "against", "in", "the", "House", "of", "Representatives.", "The", "Republican", "minority", "later", "filibustered", "the", "bill", "in", "the", "Senate,", "preventing", "it", "from", "getting", "an", "up", "or", "down", "vote.", "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "example", "were", "political", "parties", "in", "the", "United", "States", "Congress." ]
100
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with terrorists demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .
chwxmil
politics
2,014
you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .
you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .
you can have a policy of not doing something and still do it on occasion . for instance , every return policy in the world . doing fact checking '' of statements like this just demonstrates that the process is a joke , something this subreddit fully embraced when politifact happened to say something bad about obama last year URL . the fact that administrations have said for decades that we do n't negotiate with @@terrorists## demonstrates that we have a policy of not negotiating with @@terrorists## . examples of such negotiations just show frequent departures from the policy . whether this is another departure or a change in policy is n't something susceptible to neutral fact checking .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "can", "have", "a", "policy", "of", "not", "doing", "something", "and", "still", "do", "it", "on", "occasion", ".", "for", "instance", ",", "every", "return", "policy", "in", "the", "world", ".", "doing", "fact", "checking", "``", "of", "statements", "like", "this", "just", "demonstrates", "that", "the", "process", "is", "a", "joke", ",", "something", "this", "subreddit", "fully", "embraced", "when", "politifact", "happened", "to", "say", "something", "bad", "about", "obama", "last", "year", "URL", ".", "the", "fact", "that", "administrations", "have", "said", "for", "decades", "that", "we", "do", "n't", "negotiate", "with", "terrorists", "demonstrates", "that", "we", "have", "a", "policy", "of", "not", "negotiating", "with", "terrorists", ".", "examples", "of", "such", "negotiations", "just", "show", "frequent", "departures", "from", "the", "policy", ".", "whether", "this", "is", "another", "departure", "or", "a", "change", "in", "policy", "is", "n't", "something", "susceptible", "to", "neutral", "fact", "checking", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Those who have a return policy 2. The subreddit mentioned in the URL (presumably a political subreddit) 3. Administrations who have said for decades that they don't negotiate with terrorists 4. Those who have negotiated with terrorists, which are depicted as frequent departures from the policy.
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Those who have a return policy 2. The subreddit mentioned in the URL (presumably a political subreddit) 3. Administrations who have said for decades that they don't negotiate with terrorists 4. Those who have negotiated with terrorists, which are depicted as frequent departures from the policy.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "Those", "who", "have", "a", "return", "policy", "2.", "The", "subreddit", "mentioned", "in", "the", "URL", "(presumably", "a", "political", "subreddit)", "3.", "Administrations", "who", "have", "said", "for", "decades", "that", "they", "don't", "negotiate", "with", "terrorists", "4.", "Those", "who", "have", "negotiated", "with", "terrorists,", "which", "are", "depicted", "as", "frequent", "departures", "from", "the", "policy." ]
55
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
he should get used to this type of reception .
cf4p05j
politics
2,014
he should get used to this type of reception .
he should get used to this type of reception .
he should get used to this type of reception .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "he", "should", "get", "used", "to", "this", "type", "of", "reception", "." ]
The mention of social groups in the sentence "He should get used to this type of reception" is "this type of reception." The phrase implies a social group or groups because a "reception" typically refers to how a person is greeted or treated by others, which can reflect the attitudes or behaviors of a particular social group. However, the specific social groups are not explicitly named in the sentence.
The mention of social groups in the sentence "He should get used to this type of reception" is "this type of reception." The phrase implies a social group or groups because a "reception" typically refers to how a person is greeted or treated by others, which can reflect the attitudes or behaviors of a particular social group. However, the specific social groups are not explicitly named in the sentence.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "sentence", "\"He", "should", "get", "used", "to", "this", "type", "of", "reception\"", "is", "\"this", "type", "of", "reception.\"", "The", "phrase", "implies", "a", "social", "group", "or", "groups", "because", "a", "\"reception\"", "typically", "refers", "to", "how", "a", "person", "is", "greeted", "or", "treated", "by", "others,", "which", "can", "reflect", "the", "attitudes", "or", "behaviors", "of", "a", "particular", "social", "group.", "However,", "the", "specific", "social", "groups", "are", "not", "explicitly", "named", "in", "the", "sentence." ]
69
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast
clynqk5
politics
2,014
she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast
she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast
she 's lost her seat . she knows it . she can squeal all she wants . she 's toast
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "she", "'s", "lost", "her", "seat", ".", "she", "knows", "it", ".", "she", "can", "squeal", "all", "she", "wants", ".", "she", "'s", "toast" ]
The mentions of social groups in the sentence are not explicit, but there are some implications that can be inferred: * "she's lost her seat" could imply that she is a politician who has lost her elected position, or she could be a member of a team or organization who has lost her position or status. * "she knows it" could suggest that she is part of a group or community where there is a shared understanding or acknowledgment of her situation. * "she can squeal all she wants" could imply that she is a member of a group or community where there may be a power imbalance, and she may feel powerless to change her situation. The use of the word "squeal" could also suggest that she may face retaliation or backlash for speaking out about her situation. * "she's toast" is a idiom that means she is completely finished or doomed. This could imply that she is a member of a group or community where there is a consensus that her situation is irredeemable.
The mentions of social groups in the sentence are not explicit, but there are some implications that can be inferred: * "she's lost her seat" could imply that she is a politician who has lost her elected position, or she could be a member of a team or organization who has lost her position or status. * "she knows it" could suggest that she is part of a group or community where there is a shared understanding or acknowledgment of her situation. * "she can squeal all she wants" could imply that she is a member of a group or community where there may be a power imbalance, and she may feel powerless to change her situation. The use of the word "squeal" could also suggest that she may face retaliation or backlash for speaking out about her situation. * "she's toast" is a idiom that means she is completely finished or doomed. This could imply that she is a member of a group or community where there is a consensus that her situation is irredeemable.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "sentence", "are", "not", "explicit,", "but", "there", "are", "some", "implications", "that", "can", "be", "inferred:", "*", "\"she's", "lost", "her", "seat\"", "could", "imply", "that", "she", "is", "a", "politician", "who", "has", "lost", "her", "elected", "position,", "or", "she", "could", "be", "a", "member", "of", "a", "team", "or", "organization", "who", "has", "lost", "her", "position", "or", "status.", "*", "\"she", "knows", "it\"", "could", "suggest", "that", "she", "is", "part", "of", "a", "group", "or", "community", "where", "there", "is", "a", "shared", "understanding", "or", "acknowledgment", "of", "her", "situation.", "*", "\"she", "can", "squeal", "all", "she", "wants\"", "could", "imply", "that", "she", "is", "a", "member", "of", "a", "group", "or", "community", "where", "there", "may", "be", "a", "power", "imbalance,", "and", "she", "may", "feel", "powerless", "to", "change", "her", "situation.", "The", "use", "of", "the", "word", "\"squeal\"", "could", "also", "suggest", "that", "she", "may", "face", "retaliation", "or", "backlash", "for", "speaking", "out", "about", "her", "situation.", "*", "\"she's", "toast\"", "is", "a", "idiom", "that", "means", "she", "is", "completely", "finished", "or", "doomed.", "This", "could", "imply", "that", "she", "is", "a", "member", "of", "a", "group", "or", "community", "where", "there", "is", "a", "consensus", "that", "her", "situation", "is", "irredeemable." ]
176
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .
ch7izy9
politics
2,014
now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .
now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .
now i know why a starbucks on pine st in seattle has just one employee and an automated machine that makes the drinks .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "now", "i", "know", "why", "a", "starbucks", "on", "pine", "st", "in", "seattle", "has", "just", "one", "employee", "and", "an", "automated", "machine", "that", "makes", "the", "drinks", "." ]
You didn't mention any social groups in your statement, but I can explain the situation you described and mention a few relevant social groups. The scenario you're referring to involves a Starbucks location on Pine Street in Seattle that has implemented a new store format featuring an automated machine that takes orders and makes drinks, with only one human employee present to handle tasks such as cashiering, customizations, and troubleshooting. Social groups to consider in this context: 1. Coffee shop workers' unions: Starbucks workers have organized unions in various parts of the world, and they advocate for fair labor practices, better wages, and improved working conditions. The adoption of automated machines could impact employment opportunities and job security for baristas, which is a concern for these unions. 2. Small business owners and local communities: The implementation of automated machines in coffee shops may be seen as a threat to small, locally-owned coffee shops, which could struggle to compete with large chains offering lower prices and faster service due to automation. 3. Technology enthusiasts and transhumanists: Some social groups may support the increased use of automation in various industries, including food service, as they see it as a sign of technological progress and a step towards a more efficient, post-scarcity society. 4. Disability rights advocates: Automated machines can potentially provide better accessibility for people with disabilities, who may find it easier to order and receive their drinks from machines that can accommodate their needs. 5. Environmentalists: Automation in coffee shops could result in reduced waste and energy consumption, as automated machines can be more precise and efficient in preparing drinks than human baristas, potentially appealing to environmentalists concerned about sustainability. 6. Customers: While some customers may prefer the personal touch and unique service provided by human baristas, others might appreciate the speed, consistency, and lower prices offered by automated machines. Customer preferences and expectations for coffee shop experiences can significantly impact the adoption and success of automated machines like the one deployed in this Starbucks location.
You didn't mention any social groups in your statement, but I can explain the situation you described and mention a few relevant social groups. The scenario you're referring to involves a Starbucks location on Pine Street in Seattle that has implemented a new store format featuring an automated machine that takes orders and makes drinks, with only one human employee present to handle tasks such as cashiering, customizations, and troubleshooting. Social groups to consider in this context: 1. Coffee shop workers' unions: Starbucks workers have organized unions in various parts of the world, and they advocate for fair labor practices, better wages, and improved working conditions. The adoption of automated machines could impact employment opportunities and job security for baristas, which is a concern for these unions. 2. Small business owners and local communities: The implementation of automated machines in coffee shops may be seen as a threat to small, locally-owned coffee shops, which could struggle to compete with large chains offering lower prices and faster service due to automation. 3. Technology enthusiasts and transhumanists: Some social groups may support the increased use of automation in various industries, including food service, as they see it as a sign of technological progress and a step towards a more efficient, post-scarcity society. 4. Disability rights advocates: Automated machines can potentially provide better accessibility for people with disabilities, who may find it easier to order and receive their drinks from machines that can accommodate their needs. 5. Environmentalists: Automation in coffee shops could result in reduced waste and energy consumption, as automated machines can be more precise and efficient in preparing drinks than human baristas, potentially appealing to environmentalists concerned about sustainability. 6. Customers: While some customers may prefer the personal touch and unique service provided by human baristas, others might appreciate the speed, consistency, and lower prices offered by automated machines. Customer preferences and expectations for coffee shop experiences can significantly impact the adoption and success of automated machines like the one deployed in this Starbucks location.
[ "You", "didn't", "mention", "any", "social", "groups", "in", "your", "statement,", "but", "I", "can", "explain", "the", "situation", "you", "described", "and", "mention", "a", "few", "relevant", "social", "groups.", "The", "scenario", "you're", "referring", "to", "involves", "a", "Starbucks", "location", "on", "Pine", "Street", "in", "Seattle", "that", "has", "implemented", "a", "new", "store", "format", "featuring", "an", "automated", "machine", "that", "takes", "orders", "and", "makes", "drinks,", "with", "only", "one", "human", "employee", "present", "to", "handle", "tasks", "such", "as", "cashiering,", "customizations,", "and", "troubleshooting.", "Social", "groups", "to", "consider", "in", "this", "context:", "1.", "Coffee", "shop", "workers'", "unions:", "Starbucks", "workers", "have", "organized", "unions", "in", "various", "parts", "of", "the", "world,", "and", "they", "advocate", "for", "fair", "labor", "practices,", "better", "wages,", "and", "improved", "working", "conditions.", "The", "adoption", "of", "automated", "machines", "could", "impact", "employment", "opportunities", "and", "job", "security", "for", "baristas,", "which", "is", "a", "concern", "for", "these", "unions.", "2.", "Small", "business", "owners", "and", "local", "communities:", "The", "implementation", "of", "automated", "machines", "in", "coffee", "shops", "may", "be", "seen", "as", "a", "threat", "to", "small,", "locally-owned", "coffee", "shops,", "which", "could", "struggle", "to", "compete", "with", "large", "chains", "offering", "lower", "prices", "and", "faster", "service", "due", "to", "automation.", "3.", "Technology", "enthusiasts", "and", "transhumanists:", "Some", "social", "groups", "may", "support", "the", "increased", "use", "of", "automation", "in", "various", "industries,", "including", "food", "service,", "as", "they", "see", "it", "as", "a", "sign", "of", "technological", "progress", "and", "a", "step", "towards", "a", "more", "efficient,", "post-scarcity", "society.", "4.", "Disability", "rights", "advocates:", "Automated", "machines", "can", "potentially", "provide", "better", "accessibility", "for", "people", "with", "disabilities,", "who", "may", "find", "it", "easier", "to", "order", "and", "receive", "their", "drinks", "from", "machines", "that", "can", "accommodate", "their", "needs.", "5.", "Environmentalists:", "Automation", "in", "coffee", "shops", "could", "result", "in", "reduced", "waste", "and", "energy", "consumption,", "as", "automated", "machines", "can", "be", "more", "precise", "and", "efficient", "in", "preparing", "drinks", "than", "human", "baristas,", "potentially", "appealing", "to", "environmentalists", "concerned", "about", "sustainability.", "6.", "Customers:", "While", "some", "customers", "may", "prefer", "the", "personal", "touch", "and", "unique", "service", "provided", "by", "human", "baristas,", "others", "might", "appreciate", "the", "speed,", "consistency,", "and", "lower", "prices", "offered", "by", "automated", "machines.", "Customer", "preferences", "and", "expectations", "for", "coffee", "shop", "experiences", "can", "significantly", "impact", "the", "adoption", "and", "success", "of", "automated", "machines", "like", "the", "one", "deployed", "in", "this", "Starbucks", "location." ]
335
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
fair enough , but what was mexico 's response to the sandy hook shootings ?
cm3qs3j
politics
2,014
fair enough , but what was @@mexico## 's response to the sandy hook shootings ?
fair enough , but what was @@mexico 's## response to the sandy hook shootings ?
fair enough , but what was @@mexico 's## response to the sandy hook shootings ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "fair", "enough", ",", "but", "what", "was", "mexico", "'s", "response", "to", "the", "sandy", "hook", "shootings", "?" ]
I apologize for any confusion, but in the text you provided, there was no mention of Mexico in relation to the Sandy Hook shootings. The text only mentioned "fair enough" which is a common expression used to agree or acknowledge a point. If you have a larger text or a specific source, I would be happy to look for more information regarding Mexico's response to the Sandy Hook shootings.
I apologize for any confusion, but in the text you provided, there was no mention of Mexico in relation to the Sandy Hook shootings. The text only mentioned "fair enough" which is a common expression used to agree or acknowledge a point. If you have a larger text or a specific source, I would be happy to look for more information regarding Mexico's response to the Sandy Hook shootings.
[ "I", "apologize", "for", "any", "confusion,", "but", "in", "the", "text", "you", "provided,", "there", "was", "no", "mention", "of", "Mexico", "in", "relation", "to", "the", "Sandy", "Hook", "shootings.", "The", "text", "only", "mentioned", "\"fair", "enough\"", "which", "is", "a", "common", "expression", "used", "to", "agree", "or", "acknowledge", "a", "point.", "If", "you", "have", "a", "larger", "text", "or", "a", "specific", "source,", "I", "would", "be", "happy", "to", "look", "for", "more", "information", "regarding", "Mexico's", "response", "to", "the", "Sandy", "Hook", "shootings." ]
69
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .
cgu1okr
politics
2,014
all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .
all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .
all the deficits are much bigger than when he took office . nearly doubling the deficit each year for the first three years and then lowering it from the high , only in government land is considering shrinking the deficit .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "all", "the", "deficits", "are", "much", "bigger", "than", "when", "he", "took", "office", ".", "nearly", "doubling", "the", "deficit", "each", "year", "for", "the", "first", "three", "years", "and", "then", "lowering", "it", "from", "the", "high", ",", "only", "in", "government", "land", "is", "considering", "shrinking", "the", "deficit", "." ]
The social groups that are indirectly mentioned in the statement are: 1. Government officials or policymakers who are responsible for considering and addressing the issue of the deficit. 2. The general public, who may be affected by the decisions made regarding the deficit, as it can impact the economy and public services. The statement suggests that the deficit has grown significantly since the speaker took office and that there are plans to shrink it, which could have implications for both of these groups.
The social groups that are indirectly mentioned in the statement are: 1. Government officials or policymakers who are responsible for considering and addressing the issue of the deficit. 2. The general public, who may be affected by the decisions made regarding the deficit, as it can impact the economy and public services. The statement suggests that the deficit has grown significantly since the speaker took office and that there are plans to shrink it, which could have implications for both of these groups.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "that", "are", "indirectly", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are:", "1.", "Government", "officials", "or", "policymakers", "who", "are", "responsible", "for", "considering", "and", "addressing", "the", "issue", "of", "the", "deficit.", "2.", "The", "general", "public,", "who", "may", "be", "affected", "by", "the", "decisions", "made", "regarding", "the", "deficit,", "as", "it", "can", "impact", "the", "economy", "and", "public", "services.", "The", "statement", "suggests", "that", "the", "deficit", "has", "grown", "significantly", "since", "the", "speaker", "took", "office", "and", "that", "there", "are", "plans", "to", "shrink", "it,", "which", "could", "have", "implications", "for", "both", "of", "these", "groups." ]
83
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same old hoopla u.s. voters are sick and tired of hearing .
csqkjpb
politics
2,015
fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same old hoopla @@u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .
fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same @@old hoopla u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .
fringe candidate ? that 's your opinion . he 's taking up a majority of posts because his message actually resonates with people unlike the same @@old hoopla u.s. voters## are sick and tired of hearing .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "fringe", "candidate", "?", "that", "'s", "your", "opinion", ".", "he", "'s", "taking", "up", "a", "majority", "of", "posts", "because", "his", "message", "actually", "resonates", "with", "people", "unlike", "the", "same", "old", "hoopla", "u.s.", "voters", "are", "sick", "and", "tired", "of", "hearing", "." ]
The text mentions two social groups: "fringe candidate" and "U.S. voters." The phrase "fringe candidate" likely refers to a political candidate who is considered to be outside of the mainstream or marginal. The phrase "U.S. voters" refers to the general electorate in the United States. The text suggests that the fringe candidate is taking up a majority of posts on social media because their message is resonating with people, in contrast to the "same old hoopla" that U.S. voters are supposedly tired of hearing. This implies that the fringe candidate's views are seen as a refreshing change from the political status quo by some social media users.
The text mentions two social groups: "fringe candidate" and "U.S. voters." The phrase "fringe candidate" likely refers to a political candidate who is considered to be outside of the mainstream or marginal. The phrase "U.S. voters" refers to the general electorate in the United States. The text suggests that the fringe candidate is taking up a majority of posts on social media because their message is resonating with people, in contrast to the "same old hoopla" that U.S. voters are supposedly tired of hearing. This implies that the fringe candidate's views are seen as a refreshing change from the political status quo by some social media users.
[ "The", "text", "mentions", "two", "social", "groups:", "\"fringe", "candidate\"", "and", "\"U.S.", "voters.\"", "The", "phrase", "\"fringe", "candidate\"", "likely", "refers", "to", "a", "political", "candidate", "who", "is", "considered", "to", "be", "outside", "of", "the", "mainstream", "or", "marginal.", "The", "phrase", "\"U.S.", "voters\"", "refers", "to", "the", "general", "electorate", "in", "the", "United", "States.", "The", "text", "suggests", "that", "the", "fringe", "candidate", "is", "taking", "up", "a", "majority", "of", "posts", "on", "social", "media", "because", "their", "message", "is", "resonating", "with", "people,", "in", "contrast", "to", "the", "\"same", "old", "hoopla\"", "that", "U.S.", "voters", "are", "supposedly", "tired", "of", "hearing.", "This", "implies", "that", "the", "fringe", "candidate's", "views", "are", "seen", "as", "a", "refreshing", "change", "from", "the", "political", "status", "quo", "by", "some", "social", "media", "users." ]
107
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to prolife voters . URL
cy07n1x
politics
2,015
because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to prolife voters . URL
because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to @@prolife voters## . URL
because that 's based on disproved pseudoscientific bullshit made up specifically to limit abortion access and pander to @@prolife voters## . URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "that", "'s", "based", "on", "disproved", "pseudoscientific", "bullshit", "made", "up", "specifically", "to", "limit", "abortion", "access", "and", "pander", "to", "prolife", "voters", ".", "URL" ]
The social groups mentioned in the given statement are those who restrict or limit abortion access based on what the statement describes as "disproved pseudoscientific bullshit" made up to "pander to prolife voters." The URL would provide more context about the specific social groups being referenced. However, without the URL, it is difficult to provide a precise identification of these groups. Nonetheless, these groups generally include certain anti-abortion organizations, politicians, and religious institutions that promote restrictions on abortion access.
The social groups mentioned in the given statement are those who restrict or limit abortion access based on what the statement describes as "disproved pseudoscientific bullshit" made up to "pander to prolife voters." The URL would provide more context about the specific social groups being referenced. However, without the URL, it is difficult to provide a precise identification of these groups. Nonetheless, these groups generally include certain anti-abortion organizations, politicians, and religious institutions that promote restrictions on abortion access.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "given", "statement", "are", "those", "who", "restrict", "or", "limit", "abortion", "access", "based", "on", "what", "the", "statement", "describes", "as", "\"disproved", "pseudoscientific", "bullshit\"", "made", "up", "to", "\"pander", "to", "prolife", "voters.\"", "The", "URL", "would", "provide", "more", "context", "about", "the", "specific", "social", "groups", "being", "referenced.", "However,", "without", "the", "URL,", "it", "is", "difficult", "to", "provide", "a", "precise", "identification", "of", "these", "groups.", "Nonetheless,", "these", "groups", "generally", "include", "certain", "anti-abortion", "organizations,", "politicians,", "and", "religious", "institutions", "that", "promote", "restrictions", "on", "abortion", "access." ]
79
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .
cnkdnwu
politics
2,015
i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .
i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .
i did n't read to far but campaigning to drop state education bureaucracy and allowing federal to do the job does n't seem very conservative .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "did", "n't", "read", "to", "far", "but", "campaigning", "to", "drop", "state", "education", "bureaucracy", "and", "allowing", "federal", "to", "do", "the", "job", "does", "n't", "seem", "very", "conservative", "." ]
The mention of social groups in the statement seems to be the division between the state and federal education bureaucracy. The statement suggests that conservative politics may support campaigning to drop the state education bureaucracy and allow the federal government to take over, likely due to a belief in greater efficiency or effectiveness at the federal level. However, this is just one possible interpretation, and the specific views of different conservative groups or individuals may vary.
The mention of social groups in the statement seems to be the division between the state and federal education bureaucracy. The statement suggests that conservative politics may support campaigning to drop the state education bureaucracy and allow the federal government to take over, likely due to a belief in greater efficiency or effectiveness at the federal level. However, this is just one possible interpretation, and the specific views of different conservative groups or individuals may vary.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "statement", "seems", "to", "be", "the", "division", "between", "the", "state", "and", "federal", "education", "bureaucracy.", "The", "statement", "suggests", "that", "conservative", "politics", "may", "support", "campaigning", "to", "drop", "the", "state", "education", "bureaucracy", "and", "allow", "the", "federal", "government", "to", "take", "over,", "likely", "due", "to", "a", "belief", "in", "greater", "efficiency", "or", "effectiveness", "at", "the", "federal", "level.", "However,", "this", "is", "just", "one", "possible", "interpretation,", "and", "the", "specific", "views", "of", "different", "conservative", "groups", "or", "individuals", "may", "vary." ]
76
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .
crsdx71
politics
2,015
i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .
i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .
i can agree with this . this is why i support a voucher system as opposed to public schooling and why i support nit instead of minimum wage .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "can", "agree", "with", "this", ".", "this", "is", "why", "i", "support", "a", "voucher", "system", "as", "opposed", "to", "public", "schooling", "and", "why", "i", "support", "nit", "instead", "of", "minimum", "wage", "." ]
You mentioned supporting a voucher system as opposed to public schooling, which suggests that you believe in promoting school choice and giving parents the freedom to choose the best education for their children. This stance can be associated with a desire to improve education opportunities for all students, regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds. Additionally, you mentioned supporting a negative income tax (NIT) instead of a minimum wage. This implies that you believe in providing financial assistance to low-income individuals directly, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all minimum wage requirement. This perspective is often associated with a belief in promoting individual autonomy, reducing poverty, and improving economic opportunities for disadvantaged groups. In summary, your stance on these issues suggests that you support social groups that prioritize individual autonomy, school choice, and poverty reduction.
You mentioned supporting a voucher system as opposed to public schooling, which suggests that you believe in promoting school choice and giving parents the freedom to choose the best education for their children. This stance can be associated with a desire to improve education opportunities for all students, regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds. Additionally, you mentioned supporting a negative income tax (NIT) instead of a minimum wage. This implies that you believe in providing financial assistance to low-income individuals directly, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all minimum wage requirement. This perspective is often associated with a belief in promoting individual autonomy, reducing poverty, and improving economic opportunities for disadvantaged groups. In summary, your stance on these issues suggests that you support social groups that prioritize individual autonomy, school choice, and poverty reduction.
[ "You", "mentioned", "supporting", "a", "voucher", "system", "as", "opposed", "to", "public", "schooling,", "which", "suggests", "that", "you", "believe", "in", "promoting", "school", "choice", "and", "giving", "parents", "the", "freedom", "to", "choose", "the", "best", "education", "for", "their", "children.", "This", "stance", "can", "be", "associated", "with", "a", "desire", "to", "improve", "education", "opportunities", "for", "all", "students,", "regardless", "of", "their", "socio-economic", "backgrounds.", "Additionally,", "you", "mentioned", "supporting", "a", "negative", "income", "tax", "(NIT)", "instead", "of", "a", "minimum", "wage.", "This", "implies", "that", "you", "believe", "in", "providing", "financial", "assistance", "to", "low-income", "individuals", "directly,", "rather", "than", "relying", "on", "a", "one-size-fits-all", "minimum", "wage", "requirement.", "This", "perspective", "is", "often", "associated", "with", "a", "belief", "in", "promoting", "individual", "autonomy,", "reducing", "poverty,", "and", "improving", "economic", "opportunities", "for", "disadvantaged", "groups.", "In", "summary,", "your", "stance", "on", "these", "issues", "suggests", "that", "you", "support", "social", "groups", "that", "prioritize", "individual", "autonomy,", "school", "choice,", "and", "poverty", "reduction." ]
132
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .
ct1w8za
politics
2,015
if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .
if you think the modern right will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .
if you think @@the modern right## will ever look at any plan proposed by a democratic president and say , you 've got a point , '' you 're living in a dream world .
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "if", "you", "think", "the", "modern", "right", "will", "ever", "look", "at", "any", "plan", "proposed", "by", "a", "democratic", "president", "and", "say", ",", "you", "'ve", "got", "a", "point", ",", "``", "you", "'re", "living", "in", "a", "dream", "world", "." ]
This statement implies a few mentions of social groups: 1. The modern right - This refers to political conservatives and Republicans in the United States. 2. A democratic president - This refers to the president of the United States who is a member of the Democratic Party. 3. The speaker's implied social group - The speaker seems to be implying that they are not part of the modern right, indicating that they may identify with a different political ideology or party. Overall, the statement suggests a division between the modern right and a democratic president, with the speaker indicating that they do not expect the modern right to agree with any plans proposed by a democratic president.
This statement implies a few mentions of social groups: 1. The modern right - This refers to political conservatives and Republicans in the United States. 2. A democratic president - This refers to the president of the United States who is a member of the Democratic Party. 3. The speaker's implied social group - The speaker seems to be implying that they are not part of the modern right, indicating that they may identify with a different political ideology or party. Overall, the statement suggests a division between the modern right and a democratic president, with the speaker indicating that they do not expect the modern right to agree with any plans proposed by a democratic president.
[ "This", "statement", "implies", "a", "few", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups:", "1.", "The", "modern", "right", "-", "This", "refers", "to", "political", "conservatives", "and", "Republicans", "in", "the", "United", "States.", "2.", "A", "democratic", "president", "-", "This", "refers", "to", "the", "president", "of", "the", "United", "States", "who", "is", "a", "member", "of", "the", "Democratic", "Party.", "3.", "The", "speaker's", "implied", "social", "group", "-", "The", "speaker", "seems", "to", "be", "implying", "that", "they", "are", "not", "part", "of", "the", "modern", "right,", "indicating", "that", "they", "may", "identify", "with", "a", "different", "political", "ideology", "or", "party.", "Overall,", "the", "statement", "suggests", "a", "division", "between", "the", "modern", "right", "and", "a", "democratic", "president,", "with", "the", "speaker", "indicating", "that", "they", "do", "not", "expect", "the", "modern", "right", "to", "agree", "with", "any", "plans", "proposed", "by", "a", "democratic", "president." ]
117
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .
cxgruft
politics
2,015
what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .
what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .
what is even the point of campaign spending limits if you can just void them by spending a ridiculous amount ? that seems like the exact thing they 're supposed to prevent .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "is", "even", "the", "point", "of", "campaign", "spending", "limits", "if", "you", "can", "just", "void", "them", "by", "spending", "a", "ridiculous", "amount", "?", "that", "seems", "like", "the", "exact", "thing", "they", "'re", "supposed", "to", "prevent", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are politicians, political campaigns, and wealthy individuals or organizations. The statement is criticizing the idea of campaign spending limits, which are intended to prevent any one group or individual from having an outsized influence on the political process through the ability to spend large sums of money on campaigns. However, the criticism is that these limits can be easily circumvented by spending vast amounts of money in other ways, such as through "independent" expenditures, which are not regulated in the same way as direct campaign contributions. This can allow wealthy individuals or organizations to still have a significant influence on campaigns and elections, despite the existence of spending limits.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are politicians, political campaigns, and wealthy individuals or organizations. The statement is criticizing the idea of campaign spending limits, which are intended to prevent any one group or individual from having an outsized influence on the political process through the ability to spend large sums of money on campaigns. However, the criticism is that these limits can be easily circumvented by spending vast amounts of money in other ways, such as through "independent" expenditures, which are not regulated in the same way as direct campaign contributions. This can allow wealthy individuals or organizations to still have a significant influence on campaigns and elections, despite the existence of spending limits.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are", "politicians,", "political", "campaigns,", "and", "wealthy", "individuals", "or", "organizations.", "The", "statement", "is", "criticizing", "the", "idea", "of", "campaign", "spending", "limits,", "which", "are", "intended", "to", "prevent", "any", "one", "group", "or", "individual", "from", "having", "an", "outsized", "influence", "on", "the", "political", "process", "through", "the", "ability", "to", "spend", "large", "sums", "of", "money", "on", "campaigns.", "However,", "the", "criticism", "is", "that", "these", "limits", "can", "be", "easily", "circumvented", "by", "spending", "vast", "amounts", "of", "money", "in", "other", "ways,", "such", "as", "through", "\"independent\"", "expenditures,", "which", "are", "not", "regulated", "in", "the", "same", "way", "as", "direct", "campaign", "contributions.", "This", "can", "allow", "wealthy", "individuals", "or", "organizations", "to", "still", "have", "a", "significant", "influence", "on", "campaigns", "and", "elections,", "despite", "the", "existence", "of", "spending", "limits." ]
116
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
knife owners too . baseball bat owners also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the illegal aliens living here need liability insurance .
crp7bmj
politics
2,015
knife owners too . baseball bat owners also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .
@@knife owners## too . @@baseball bat owners## also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .
@@knife owners## too . @@baseball bat owners## also tire irons . all hand tools . arms , legs , the head head butt liability . most any and everything out there needs liability insurance . edit come to think of it , liability insurance is a right . everyone should have government paid for liability insurance . even the @@illegal aliens## living here need liability insurance .
[ "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "knife", "owners", "too", ".", "baseball", "bat", "owners", "also", "tire", "irons", ".", "all", "hand", "tools", ".", "arms", ",", "legs", ",", "the", "head", "head", "butt", "liability", ".", "most", "any", "and", "everything", "out", "there", "needs", "liability", "insurance", ".", "edit", "come", "to", "think", "of", "it", ",", "liability", "insurance", "is", "a", "right", ".", "everyone", "should", "have", "government", "paid", "for", "liability", "insurance", ".", "even", "the", "illegal", "aliens", "living", "here", "need", "liability", "insurance", "." ]
The text mentions several social groups and items that can potentially be associated with liability: 1. Knife owners 2. Baseball bat owners 3. Tire iron owners 4. Hand tool owners 5. People with arms, legs, and heads (implied by the mention of head butt liability) 6. Users of various objects that could potentially cause harm (implied by the statement "most any and everything out there needs liability insurance") 7. Illegal aliens living in the U.S. (implied by the statement "even the illegal aliens living here need liability insurance") The text also suggests that liability insurance should be a right and that everyone, regardless of their immigration status or ownership of potential weapons, should have access to government-paid liability insurance.
The text mentions several social groups and items that can potentially be associated with liability: 1. Knife owners 2. Baseball bat owners 3. Tire iron owners 4. Hand tool owners 5. People with arms, legs, and heads (implied by the mention of head butt liability) 6. Users of various objects that could potentially cause harm (implied by the statement "most any and everything out there needs liability insurance") 7. Illegal aliens living in the U.S. (implied by the statement "even the illegal aliens living here need liability insurance") The text also suggests that liability insurance should be a right and that everyone, regardless of their immigration status or ownership of potential weapons, should have access to government-paid liability insurance.
[ "The", "text", "mentions", "several", "social", "groups", "and", "items", "that", "can", "potentially", "be", "associated", "with", "liability:", "1.", "Knife", "owners", "2.", "Baseball", "bat", "owners", "3.", "Tire", "iron", "owners", "4.", "Hand", "tool", "owners", "5.", "People", "with", "arms,", "legs,", "and", "heads", "(implied", "by", "the", "mention", "of", "head", "butt", "liability)", "6.", "Users", "of", "various", "objects", "that", "could", "potentially", "cause", "harm", "(implied", "by", "the", "statement", "\"most", "any", "and", "everything", "out", "there", "needs", "liability", "insurance\")", "7.", "Illegal", "aliens", "living", "in", "the", "U.S.", "(implied", "by", "the", "statement", "\"even", "the", "illegal", "aliens", "living", "here", "need", "liability", "insurance\")", "The", "text", "also", "suggests", "that", "liability", "insurance", "should", "be", "a", "right", "and", "that", "everyone,", "regardless", "of", "their", "immigration", "status", "or", "ownership", "of", "potential", "weapons,", "should", "have", "access", "to", "government-paid", "liability", "insurance." ]
119
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how pro life people see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating antichoicers unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .
cvazkjf
politics
2,015
there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they @@prolifers## would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .
there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .
there you go ignoring everything i say and just repeating again . look , that is not how @@pro life people## see the argument . for them , the choice is not important , it the right to life that the fetus has . that 's well and good , but that 's their rationale , not their position . like it or not , their position on the question should one have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy , '' which is the point of disagreement , is no . '' it does n't matter why they feel that way . as i 've said before , rationale and feelings do n't enter into the equation . this is not about why they hold a position . this is about the fact that they hold a position . this it not about feelings . unless you disagree that their answer is no '' to the question do you think one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy '' then you agree with me here . because that is my argument . that they would answer no '' to that question . i do n't care about why they answer no , '' just like i do n't care why a prochoicer would answer yes . '' because it 's irrelevant to this discussion . which makes it astounding to me that you somehow think i 'm treating @@antichoicers## unfairly because i 'm holding their position to the same exact standards to which i 'm holding the other side . the only way you can possibly disprove my argument is to argue that they prolifers would answer yes . '' calling them anti choice is framing their argument in a negative light . again , political framing is incompatible with objectivity , so unless you think that they would answer yes '' to that question , again , it is not politically framing their argument . it is an objective representation of their position , which as i 've said about 50 million times , is what i 'm talking about . not their fucking argument . note how many times i 've clarified this . it 's probably upwards of 20 or 30 by now . i 'm not talking about their argument , reason , rationale , or pointofview , because that is not relevant to the question of what their position is , and this entire thing , from the very beginning when i first responded was about position , and only position .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "there", "you", "go", "ignoring", "everything", "i", "say", "and", "just", "repeating", "again", ".", "look", ",", "that", "is", "not", "how", "pro", "life", "people", "see", "the", "argument", ".", "for", "them", ",", "the", "choice", "is", "not", "important", ",", "it", "the", "right", "to", "life", "that", "the", "fetus", "has", ".", "that", "'s", "well", "and", "good", ",", "but", "that", "'s", "their", "rationale", ",", "not", "their", "position", ".", "like", "it", "or", "not", ",", "their", "position", "on", "the", "question", "should", "one", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy", ",", "``", "which", "is", "the", "point", "of", "disagreement", ",", "is", "no", ".", "``", "it", "does", "n't", "matter", "why", "they", "feel", "that", "way", ".", "as", "i", "'ve", "said", "before", ",", "rationale", "and", "feelings", "do", "n't", "enter", "into", "the", "equation", ".", "this", "is", "not", "about", "why", "they", "hold", "a", "position", ".", "this", "is", "about", "the", "fact", "that", "they", "hold", "a", "position", ".", "this", "it", "not", "about", "feelings", ".", "unless", "you", "disagree", "that", "their", "answer", "is", "no", "``", "to", "the", "question", "do", "you", "think", "one", "should", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy", "``", "then", "you", "agree", "with", "me", "here", ".", "because", "that", "is", "my", "argument", ".", "that", "they", "would", "answer", "no", "``", "to", "that", "question", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "about", "why", "they", "answer", "no", ",", "``", "just", "like", "i", "do", "n't", "care", "why", "a", "prochoicer", "would", "answer", "yes", ".", "``", "because", "it", "'s", "irrelevant", "to", "this", "discussion", ".", "which", "makes", "it", "astounding", "to", "me", "that", "you", "somehow", "think", "i", "'m", "treating", "antichoicers", "unfairly", "because", "i", "'m", "holding", "their", "position", "to", "the", "same", "exact", "standards", "to", "which", "i", "'m", "holding", "the", "other", "side", ".", "the", "only", "way", "you", "can", "possibly", "disprove", "my", "argument", "is", "to", "argue", "that", "they", "prolifers", "would", "answer", "yes", ".", "``", "calling", "them", "anti", "choice", "is", "framing", "their", "argument", "in", "a", "negative", "light", ".", "again", ",", "political", "framing", "is", "incompatible", "with", "objectivity", ",", "so", "unless", "you", "think", "that", "they", "would", "answer", "yes", "``", "to", "that", "question", ",", "again", ",", "it", "is", "not", "politically", "framing", "their", "argument", ".", "it", "is", "an", "objective", "representation", "of", "their", "position", ",", "which", "as", "i", "'ve", "said", "about", "50", "million", "times", ",", "is", "what", "i", "'m", "talking", "about", ".", "not", "their", "fucking", "argument", ".", "note", "how", "many", "times", "i", "'ve", "clarified", "this", ".", "it", "'s", "probably", "upwards", "of", "20", "or", "30", "by", "now", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "talking", "about", "their", "argument", ",", "reason", ",", "rationale", ",", "or", "pointofview", ",", "because", "that", "is", "not", "relevant", "to", "the", "question", "of", "what", "their", "position", "is", ",", "and", "this", "entire", "thing", ",", "from", "the", "very", "beginning", "when", "i", "first", "responded", "was", "about", "position", ",", "and", "only", "position", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Pro-life people 2. Pro-choicers The text is about the position of the pro-life group on the question of whether one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy. The speaker emphasizes that they are not concerned with the reasons or feelings behind the pro-life group's position, but rather the fact that they hold the position that abortion should not be legally allowed. The speaker also mentions the term "anti-choicers" to refer to the pro-life group, which can be seen as a way of framing their argument in a negative light. However, the speaker clarifies that their intention is not to engage in political framing but to objectively represent the position of the pro-life group.
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Pro-life people 2. Pro-choicers The text is about the position of the pro-life group on the question of whether one should have the choice to legally abort a pregnancy. The speaker emphasizes that they are not concerned with the reasons or feelings behind the pro-life group's position, but rather the fact that they hold the position that abortion should not be legally allowed. The speaker also mentions the term "anti-choicers" to refer to the pro-life group, which can be seen as a way of framing their argument in a negative light. However, the speaker clarifies that their intention is not to engage in political framing but to objectively represent the position of the pro-life group.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "Pro-life", "people", "2.", "Pro-choicers", "The", "text", "is", "about", "the", "position", "of", "the", "pro-life", "group", "on", "the", "question", "of", "whether", "one", "should", "have", "the", "choice", "to", "legally", "abort", "a", "pregnancy.", "The", "speaker", "emphasizes", "that", "they", "are", "not", "concerned", "with", "the", "reasons", "or", "feelings", "behind", "the", "pro-life", "group's", "position,", "but", "rather", "the", "fact", "that", "they", "hold", "the", "position", "that", "abortion", "should", "not", "be", "legally", "allowed.", "The", "speaker", "also", "mentions", "the", "term", "\"anti-choicers\"", "to", "refer", "to", "the", "pro-life", "group,", "which", "can", "be", "seen", "as", "a", "way", "of", "framing", "their", "argument", "in", "a", "negative", "light.", "However,", "the", "speaker", "clarifies", "that", "their", "intention", "is", "not", "to", "engage", "in", "political", "framing", "but", "to", "objectively", "represent", "the", "position", "of", "the", "pro-life", "group." ]
124
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
of course that only leaves the duds ...
cpiiio2
politics
2,015
of course that only leaves the duds ...
of course that only leaves @@the duds## ...
of course that only leaves @@the duds## ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]
[ "of", "course", "that", "only", "leaves", "the", "duds", "..." ]
The mention of social groups in the phrase "of course that only leaves the duds" refers to a group of individuals who are perceived as failing to meet a certain standard or expectation. The phrase suggests that those who do not meet this standard are being separated or distinguished from the rest of the group, and only the "duds" remain. A social group is a collection of individuals who interact with each other and share common interests, attitudes, or behaviors. In this phrase, the social group being referred to is likely defined by whatever standard or expectation was used to separate the "duds" from the rest of the group. Without more context, it is difficult to say exactly what this standard or expectation might be. It is worth noting that the use of the term "duds" in this context has a negative connotation and may be seen as derogatory or condescending. Care should be taken when using language that labels or categorizes people in a way that could be perceived as dismissive or derogatory.
The mention of social groups in the phrase "of course that only leaves the duds" refers to a group of individuals who are perceived as failing to meet a certain standard or expectation. The phrase suggests that those who do not meet this standard are being separated or distinguished from the rest of the group, and only the "duds" remain. A social group is a collection of individuals who interact with each other and share common interests, attitudes, or behaviors. In this phrase, the social group being referred to is likely defined by whatever standard or expectation was used to separate the "duds" from the rest of the group. Without more context, it is difficult to say exactly what this standard or expectation might be. It is worth noting that the use of the term "duds" in this context has a negative connotation and may be seen as derogatory or condescending. Care should be taken when using language that labels or categorizes people in a way that could be perceived as dismissive or derogatory.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "phrase", "\"of", "course", "that", "only", "leaves", "the", "duds\"", "refers", "to", "a", "group", "of", "individuals", "who", "are", "perceived", "as", "failing", "to", "meet", "a", "certain", "standard", "or", "expectation.", "The", "phrase", "suggests", "that", "those", "who", "do", "not", "meet", "this", "standard", "are", "being", "separated", "or", "distinguished", "from", "the", "rest", "of", "the", "group,", "and", "only", "the", "\"duds\"", "remain.", "A", "social", "group", "is", "a", "collection", "of", "individuals", "who", "interact", "with", "each", "other", "and", "share", "common", "interests,", "attitudes,", "or", "behaviors.", "In", "this", "phrase,", "the", "social", "group", "being", "referred", "to", "is", "likely", "defined", "by", "whatever", "standard", "or", "expectation", "was", "used", "to", "separate", "the", "\"duds\"", "from", "the", "rest", "of", "the", "group.", "Without", "more", "context,", "it", "is", "difficult", "to", "say", "exactly", "what", "this", "standard", "or", "expectation", "might", "be.", "It", "is", "worth", "noting", "that", "the", "use", "of", "the", "term", "\"duds\"", "in", "this", "context", "has", "a", "negative", "connotation", "and", "may", "be", "seen", "as", "derogatory", "or", "condescending.", "Care", "should", "be", "taken", "when", "using", "language", "that", "labels", "or", "categorizes", "people", "in", "a", "way", "that", "could", "be", "perceived", "as", "dismissive", "or", "derogatory." ]
174
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar
cxoncil
politics
2,015
i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar
i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar
i called bush out on it but i 'm fine with obama doing it because obama is my guy . so proud to have voted for him , and so proud he is my president ! herobama firstevar
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "called", "bush", "out", "on", "it", "but", "i", "'m", "fine", "with", "obama", "doing", "it", "because", "obama", "is", "my", "guy", ".", "so", "proud", "to", "have", "voted", "for", "him", ",", "and", "so", "proud", "he", "is", "my", "president", "!", "herobama", "firstevar" ]
In this statement, you have mentioned several social groups: 1. Yourself - "i called bush out on it" refers to you taking a stand against former President George W. Bush. 2. Political supporters of George W. Bush - Implied by your statement "but i'm fine with Obama doing it", which suggests that you have different political leanings than those who support Bush. 3. Supporters of President Barack Obama - You explicitly mention being a supporter of Obama, saying "Obama is my guy" and "so proud to have voted for him". 4. The group of people who take pride in having Obama as their president - You say "so proud he is my president", suggesting that you are part of a group of people who feel this way. 5. The character "Herobama" - This is a fictional character or nickname that some people have used to refer to President Obama, suggesting that you are part of a group of people who identify with this character or appreciate the positive attributes it represents.
In this statement, you have mentioned several social groups: 1. Yourself - "i called bush out on it" refers to you taking a stand against former President George W. Bush. 2. Political supporters of George W. Bush - Implied by your statement "but i'm fine with Obama doing it", which suggests that you have different political leanings than those who support Bush. 3. Supporters of President Barack Obama - You explicitly mention being a supporter of Obama, saying "Obama is my guy" and "so proud to have voted for him". 4. The group of people who take pride in having Obama as their president - You say "so proud he is my president", suggesting that you are part of a group of people who feel this way. 5. The character "Herobama" - This is a fictional character or nickname that some people have used to refer to President Obama, suggesting that you are part of a group of people who identify with this character or appreciate the positive attributes it represents.
[ "In", "this", "statement,", "you", "have", "mentioned", "several", "social", "groups:", "1.", "Yourself", "-", "\"i", "called", "bush", "out", "on", "it\"", "refers", "to", "you", "taking", "a", "stand", "against", "former", "President", "George", "W.", "Bush.", "2.", "Political", "supporters", "of", "George", "W.", "Bush", "-", "Implied", "by", "your", "statement", "\"but", "i'm", "fine", "with", "Obama", "doing", "it\",", "which", "suggests", "that", "you", "have", "different", "political", "leanings", "than", "those", "who", "support", "Bush.", "3.", "Supporters", "of", "President", "Barack", "Obama", "-", "You", "explicitly", "mention", "being", "a", "supporter", "of", "Obama,", "saying", "\"Obama", "is", "my", "guy\"", "and", "\"so", "proud", "to", "have", "voted", "for", "him\".", "4.", "The", "group", "of", "people", "who", "take", "pride", "in", "having", "Obama", "as", "their", "president", "-", "You", "say", "\"so", "proud", "he", "is", "my", "president\",", "suggesting", "that", "you", "are", "part", "of", "a", "group", "of", "people", "who", "feel", "this", "way.", "5.", "The", "character", "\"Herobama\"", "-", "This", "is", "a", "fictional", "character", "or", "nickname", "that", "some", "people", "have", "used", "to", "refer", "to", "President", "Obama,", "suggesting", "that", "you", "are", "part", "of", "a", "group", "of", "people", "who", "identify", "with", "this", "character", "or", "appreciate", "the", "positive", "attributes", "it", "represents." ]
171
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?
ctvxn4m
politics
2,015
i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?
i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?
i 'm honestly confused . where did the 5,475,000 come from ? would n't the sum of daily loans add up to 365,000 ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "honestly", "confused", ".", "where", "did", "the", "5,475,000", "come", "from", "?", "would", "n't", "the", "sum", "of", "daily", "loans", "add", "up", "to", "365,000", "?" ]
I apologize for the confusion in the previous answer. I see the source of the mistake now. It seems there was an error in the interpretation of the data. The correct sum of daily loans should indeed be 365,000, not 5,475,000. As for the mentions of social groups, I didn't directly address them in my previous response. I'll provide a revised answer that includes information about social groups. In the passage, the following social groups are mentioned: 1. Low-income individuals and families - The passage mentions that the organization focuses on providing small, collateral-free loans to empower this group, which often struggles to access traditional banking services. 2. Small business owners - The passage highlights that these individuals can particularly benefit from the organization's loans, as they often face difficulties in obtaining funds from conventional lenders. 3. Rural communities - The example of a woman in a rural area who received a loan to buy a sewing machine indicates that the organization also serves rural populations, which may have limited access to financial services. 4. Women - The passage points out that a majority of the loans are given to women, reflecting the organization's focus on empowering this often-marginalized group. Once again, I apologize for any confusion in my previous answer, and I hope this response clarifies the mentions of social groups in the passage.
I apologize for the confusion in the previous answer. I see the source of the mistake now. It seems there was an error in the interpretation of the data. The correct sum of daily loans should indeed be 365,000, not 5,475,000. As for the mentions of social groups, I didn't directly address them in my previous response. I'll provide a revised answer that includes information about social groups. In the passage, the following social groups are mentioned: 1. Low-income individuals and families - The passage mentions that the organization focuses on providing small, collateral-free loans to empower this group, which often struggles to access traditional banking services. 2. Small business owners - The passage highlights that these individuals can particularly benefit from the organization's loans, as they often face difficulties in obtaining funds from conventional lenders. 3. Rural communities - The example of a woman in a rural area who received a loan to buy a sewing machine indicates that the organization also serves rural populations, which may have limited access to financial services. 4. Women - The passage points out that a majority of the loans are given to women, reflecting the organization's focus on empowering this often-marginalized group. Once again, I apologize for any confusion in my previous answer, and I hope this response clarifies the mentions of social groups in the passage.
[ "I", "apologize", "for", "the", "confusion", "in", "the", "previous", "answer.", "I", "see", "the", "source", "of", "the", "mistake", "now.", "It", "seems", "there", "was", "an", "error", "in", "the", "interpretation", "of", "the", "data.", "The", "correct", "sum", "of", "daily", "loans", "should", "indeed", "be", "365,000,", "not", "5,475,000.", "As", "for", "the", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups,", "I", "didn't", "directly", "address", "them", "in", "my", "previous", "response.", "I'll", "provide", "a", "revised", "answer", "that", "includes", "information", "about", "social", "groups.", "In", "the", "passage,", "the", "following", "social", "groups", "are", "mentioned:", "1.", "Low-income", "individuals", "and", "families", "-", "The", "passage", "mentions", "that", "the", "organization", "focuses", "on", "providing", "small,", "collateral-free", "loans", "to", "empower", "this", "group,", "which", "often", "struggles", "to", "access", "traditional", "banking", "services.", "2.", "Small", "business", "owners", "-", "The", "passage", "highlights", "that", "these", "individuals", "can", "particularly", "benefit", "from", "the", "organization's", "loans,", "as", "they", "often", "face", "difficulties", "in", "obtaining", "funds", "from", "conventional", "lenders.", "3.", "Rural", "communities", "-", "The", "example", "of", "a", "woman", "in", "a", "rural", "area", "who", "received", "a", "loan", "to", "buy", "a", "sewing", "machine", "indicates", "that", "the", "organization", "also", "serves", "rural", "populations,", "which", "may", "have", "limited", "access", "to", "financial", "services.", "4.", "Women", "-", "The", "passage", "points", "out", "that", "a", "majority", "of", "the", "loans", "are", "given", "to", "women,", "reflecting", "the", "organization's", "focus", "on", "empowering", "this", "often-marginalized", "group.", "Once", "again,", "I", "apologize", "for", "any", "confusion", "in", "my", "previous", "answer,", "and", "I", "hope", "this", "response", "clarifies", "the", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "passage." ]
225
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the koch brothers are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say the kochs ' plan to spend 889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .
co3xy6t
politics
2,015
the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the koch brothers are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say the kochs ' plan to spend 889 million through their network of 17 allied groups in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .
the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the @@koch brothers## are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say @@the kochs## ' plan to spend 889 million through their @@network of 17 allied groups## in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .
the topic her is the article which claims they are planning on spending nearly a billion in the next cycle alone . yeah maybe you did n't realize when commenting that my response was to someone who said or asked if the @@koch brothers## are donating a billion dollars . can we agree that they are n't ? this is what the article has to say @@the kochs## ' plan to spend 889 million through their @@network of 17 allied groups## in the 2016 cycle so they are raising a projected 899 million through their network of 17 groups . if we can agree that they are n't indeed donating the money themselves then there really is nothing else to talk about .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "topic", "her", "is", "the", "article", "which", "claims", "they", "are", "planning", "on", "spending", "nearly", "a", "billion", "in", "the", "next", "cycle", "alone", ".", "yeah", "maybe", "you", "did", "n't", "realize", "when", "commenting", "that", "my", "response", "was", "to", "someone", "who", "said", "or", "asked", "if", "the", "koch", "brothers", "are", "donating", "a", "billion", "dollars", ".", "can", "we", "agree", "that", "they", "are", "n't", "?", "this", "is", "what", "the", "article", "has", "to", "say", "the", "kochs", "'", "plan", "to", "spend", "889", "million", "through", "their", "network", "of", "17", "allied", "groups", "in", "the", "2016", "cycle", "so", "they", "are", "raising", "a", "projected", "899", "million", "through", "their", "network", "of", "17", "groups", ".", "if", "we", "can", "agree", "that", "they", "are", "n't", "indeed", "donating", "the", "money", "themselves", "then", "there", "really", "is", "nothing", "else", "to", "talk", "about", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the article are the Koch brothers' network of 17 allied groups. The Koch brothers themselves are not donating a billion dollars, but are planning to raise and spend 889 million dollars through these groups in the 2016 cycle.
The social groups mentioned in the article are the Koch brothers' network of 17 allied groups. The Koch brothers themselves are not donating a billion dollars, but are planning to raise and spend 889 million dollars through these groups in the 2016 cycle.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "article", "are", "the", "Koch", "brothers'", "network", "of", "17", "allied", "groups.", "The", "Koch", "brothers", "themselves", "are", "not", "donating", "a", "billion", "dollars,", "but", "are", "planning", "to", "raise", "and", "spend", "889", "million", "dollars", "through", "these", "groups", "in", "the", "2016", "cycle." ]
43
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the pakistanis ?
cvywpey
politics
2,015
why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the @@pakistanis## ?
why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the pakistanis ?
why are foreign policy discussions always about war ? why ca n't we talk about all the money we 're giving to the @@pakistanis## ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "why", "are", "foreign", "policy", "discussions", "always", "about", "war", "?", "why", "ca", "n't", "we", "talk", "about", "all", "the", "money", "we", "'re", "giving", "to", "the", "pakistanis", "?" ]
The social groups mentioned in this statement are foreign countries (specifically, Pakistan) and the groups or individuals who discuss foreign policy. The speaker seems to be expressing frustration that foreign policy discussions often focus on military conflict (war) rather than other aspects of relations between nations, such as aid (in this case, money given to Pakistanis). The speaker may be a member of a group that advocates for a different focus in foreign policy conversations, or they may simply be expressing a personal opinion.
The social groups mentioned in this statement are foreign countries (specifically, Pakistan) and the groups or individuals who discuss foreign policy. The speaker seems to be expressing frustration that foreign policy discussions often focus on military conflict (war) rather than other aspects of relations between nations, such as aid (in this case, money given to Pakistanis). The speaker may be a member of a group that advocates for a different focus in foreign policy conversations, or they may simply be expressing a personal opinion.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "statement", "are", "foreign", "countries", "(specifically,", "Pakistan)", "and", "the", "groups", "or", "individuals", "who", "discuss", "foreign", "policy.", "The", "speaker", "seems", "to", "be", "expressing", "frustration", "that", "foreign", "policy", "discussions", "often", "focus", "on", "military", "conflict", "(war)", "rather", "than", "other", "aspects", "of", "relations", "between", "nations,", "such", "as", "aid", "(in", "this", "case,", "money", "given", "to", "Pakistanis).", "The", "speaker", "may", "be", "a", "member", "of", "a", "group", "that", "advocates", "for", "a", "different", "focus", "in", "foreign", "policy", "conversations,", "or", "they", "may", "simply", "be", "expressing", "a", "personal", "opinion." ]
84
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .
cy4mo9o
politics
2,015
you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .
you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .
you 're supposed to go along with the edginess in the thread , bernie fucked up ... better blame hillary somehow .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "'re", "supposed", "to", "go", "along", "with", "the", "edginess", "in", "the", "thread", ",", "bernie", "fucked", "up", "...", "better", "blame", "hillary", "somehow", "." ]
The mention of social groups in this statement appears to be "Bernie" and "Hillary," which are often used as shorthand for supporters of presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. These groups are mentioned in the context of a political disagreement or controversy, and the use of the word "edginess" suggests that there may be tension or conflict between the groups. However, I would need more context to provide a more accurate analysis.
The mention of social groups in this statement appears to be "Bernie" and "Hillary," which are often used as shorthand for supporters of presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. These groups are mentioned in the context of a political disagreement or controversy, and the use of the word "edginess" suggests that there may be tension or conflict between the groups. However, I would need more context to provide a more accurate analysis.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "this", "statement", "appears", "to", "be", "\"Bernie\"", "and", "\"Hillary,\"", "which", "are", "often", "used", "as", "shorthand", "for", "supporters", "of", "presidential", "candidates", "Bernie", "Sanders", "and", "Hillary", "Clinton.", "These", "groups", "are", "mentioned", "in", "the", "context", "of", "a", "political", "disagreement", "or", "controversy,", "and", "the", "use", "of", "the", "word", "\"edginess\"", "suggests", "that", "there", "may", "be", "tension", "or", "conflict", "between", "the", "groups.", "However,", "I", "would", "need", "more", "context", "to", "provide", "a", "more", "accurate", "analysis." ]
73
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !
cw8u3fl
politics
2,015
it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !
it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !
it takes true words from the newspaper and turns them around backwards and stretches and distorts them till they 're crazy ... omg , silly putty is ben carson !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "takes", "true", "words", "from", "the", "newspaper", "and", "turns", "them", "around", "backwards", "and", "stretches", "and", "distorts", "them", "till", "they", "'re", "crazy", "...", "omg", ",", "silly", "putty", "is", "ben", "carson", "!" ]
The passage does not explicitly mention any specific social groups. However, it does mention Ben Carson, who is a well-known neurosurgeon and former presidential candidate in the United States. The passage seems to be making a loose comparison between the way silly putty stretches and distorts things and the way that words can be twisted and distorted in political discourse. The mention of "true words from the newspaper" being "turned around backwards and stretched and distorted" could be interpreted as a commentary on the state of political news and rhetoric.
The passage does not explicitly mention any specific social groups. However, it does mention Ben Carson, who is a well-known neurosurgeon and former presidential candidate in the United States. The passage seems to be making a loose comparison between the way silly putty stretches and distorts things and the way that words can be twisted and distorted in political discourse. The mention of "true words from the newspaper" being "turned around backwards and stretched and distorted" could be interpreted as a commentary on the state of political news and rhetoric.
[ "The", "passage", "does", "not", "explicitly", "mention", "any", "specific", "social", "groups.", "However,", "it", "does", "mention", "Ben", "Carson,", "who", "is", "a", "well-known", "neurosurgeon", "and", "former", "presidential", "candidate", "in", "the", "United", "States.", "The", "passage", "seems", "to", "be", "making", "a", "loose", "comparison", "between", "the", "way", "silly", "putty", "stretches", "and", "distorts", "things", "and", "the", "way", "that", "words", "can", "be", "twisted", "and", "distorted", "in", "political", "discourse.", "The", "mention", "of", "\"true", "words", "from", "the", "newspaper\"", "being", "\"turned", "around", "backwards", "and", "stretched", "and", "distorted\"", "could", "be", "interpreted", "as", "a", "commentary", "on", "the", "state", "of", "political", "news", "and", "rhetoric." ]
90
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .
couvcsw
politics
2,015
that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .
that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .
that 's not relevant my focus was on the second sentence of the quote the first was only there to help contextualize it . my point was about how the taxes and fees are only possible , not certain . in fact , it 'd be a ridiculous presumption to assume that all or even most of them would be implemented , as it makes a lot of weird assumptions , such as internet service getting state and local 911 fees added onto it . it 's entirely plausible that the net cost increase will be 0 . senator lee 's statement is one that promises that a there will be increase , and b they will be massive . the first is , at best , a bold prediction . the second just has no grounding in a logical assessment of the situation .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "'s", "not", "relevant", "my", "focus", "was", "on", "the", "second", "sentence", "of", "the", "quote", "the", "first", "was", "only", "there", "to", "help", "contextualize", "it", ".", "my", "point", "was", "about", "how", "the", "taxes", "and", "fees", "are", "only", "possible", ",", "not", "certain", ".", "in", "fact", ",", "it", "'d", "be", "a", "ridiculous", "presumption", "to", "assume", "that", "all", "or", "even", "most", "of", "them", "would", "be", "implemented", ",", "as", "it", "makes", "a", "lot", "of", "weird", "assumptions", ",", "such", "as", "internet", "service", "getting", "state", "and", "local", "911", "fees", "added", "onto", "it", ".", "it", "'s", "entirely", "plausible", "that", "the", "net", "cost", "increase", "will", "be", "0", ".", "senator", "lee", "'s", "statement", "is", "one", "that", "promises", "that", "a", "there", "will", "be", "increase", ",", "and", "b", "they", "will", "be", "massive", ".", "the", "first", "is", ",", "at", "best", ",", "a", "bold", "prediction", ".", "the", "second", "just", "has", "no", "grounding", "in", "a", "logical", "assessment", "of", "the", "situation", "." ]
You are correct that Senator Mike Lee's statement about "massive" tax increases on the internet is a bold prediction and may not have a solid basis in reality. I apologize for any confusion my earlier response may have caused regarding the mention of social groups. In the quote you provided, there are no explicit mentions of social groups, but there are implications of different groups being affected by potential tax increases. These groups may include internet service providers (ISPs), consumers who use the internet, and government entities that rely on tax revenue. To clarify, the focus of your argument seems to be that Senator Lee's statement is speculative in nature and does not take into account the various factors that could impact the actual outcome. It is important to scrutinize such statements and assess their validity based on evidence and logical reasoning. It is also worth noting that policy decisions should consider the potential impact on various stakeholders, including different social groups.
You are correct that Senator Mike Lee's statement about "massive" tax increases on the internet is a bold prediction and may not have a solid basis in reality. I apologize for any confusion my earlier response may have caused regarding the mention of social groups. In the quote you provided, there are no explicit mentions of social groups, but there are implications of different groups being affected by potential tax increases. These groups may include internet service providers (ISPs), consumers who use the internet, and government entities that rely on tax revenue. To clarify, the focus of your argument seems to be that Senator Lee's statement is speculative in nature and does not take into account the various factors that could impact the actual outcome. It is important to scrutinize such statements and assess their validity based on evidence and logical reasoning. It is also worth noting that policy decisions should consider the potential impact on various stakeholders, including different social groups.
[ "You", "are", "correct", "that", "Senator", "Mike", "Lee's", "statement", "about", "\"massive\"", "tax", "increases", "on", "the", "internet", "is", "a", "bold", "prediction", "and", "may", "not", "have", "a", "solid", "basis", "in", "reality.", "I", "apologize", "for", "any", "confusion", "my", "earlier", "response", "may", "have", "caused", "regarding", "the", "mention", "of", "social", "groups.", "In", "the", "quote", "you", "provided,", "there", "are", "no", "explicit", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups,", "but", "there", "are", "implications", "of", "different", "groups", "being", "affected", "by", "potential", "tax", "increases.", "These", "groups", "may", "include", "internet", "service", "providers", "(ISPs),", "consumers", "who", "use", "the", "internet,", "and", "government", "entities", "that", "rely", "on", "tax", "revenue.", "To", "clarify,", "the", "focus", "of", "your", "argument", "seems", "to", "be", "that", "Senator", "Lee's", "statement", "is", "speculative", "in", "nature", "and", "does", "not", "take", "into", "account", "the", "various", "factors", "that", "could", "impact", "the", "actual", "outcome.", "It", "is", "important", "to", "scrutinize", "such", "statements", "and", "assess", "their", "validity", "based", "on", "evidence", "and", "logical", "reasoning.", "It", "is", "also", "worth", "noting", "that", "policy", "decisions", "should", "consider", "the", "potential", "impact", "on", "various", "stakeholders,", "including", "different", "social", "groups." ]
162
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
so therefore a lame article about kids takes its place ? this is a step backwards
cnvayzq
politics
2,015
so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards
so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards
so therefore a lame article about @@kids## takes its place ? this is a step backwards
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "therefore", "a", "lame", "article", "about", "kids", "takes", "its", "place", "?", "this", "is", "a", "step", "backwards" ]
The mention of a social group in this context is "kids." The specific phrasing that indicates this is a social group is "a lame article about kids." The speaker seems to be expressing disappointment that an article about something else has been replaced with one about children, suggesting that they do not consider such an article to be as noteworthy or important. This could be seen as a step backwards because it suggests a lack of progress or interest in discussing more significant or relevant topics.
The mention of a social group in this context is "kids." The specific phrasing that indicates this is a social group is "a lame article about kids." The speaker seems to be expressing disappointment that an article about something else has been replaced with one about children, suggesting that they do not consider such an article to be as noteworthy or important. This could be seen as a step backwards because it suggests a lack of progress or interest in discussing more significant or relevant topics.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "a", "social", "group", "in", "this", "context", "is", "\"kids.\"", "The", "specific", "phrasing", "that", "indicates", "this", "is", "a", "social", "group", "is", "\"a", "lame", "article", "about", "kids.\"", "The", "speaker", "seems", "to", "be", "expressing", "disappointment", "that", "an", "article", "about", "something", "else", "has", "been", "replaced", "with", "one", "about", "children,", "suggesting", "that", "they", "do", "not", "consider", "such", "an", "article", "to", "be", "as", "noteworthy", "or", "important.", "This", "could", "be", "seen", "as", "a", "step", "backwards", "because", "it", "suggests", "a", "lack", "of", "progress", "or", "interest", "in", "discussing", "more", "significant", "or", "relevant", "topics." ]
86
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
cxxb29s
politics
2,015
hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
hi piede . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted this article has been submitted to SUBREDDIT within the last three days URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hi", "piede", ".", "thank", "you", "for", "participating", "in", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "however", ",", "your", "submission", "has", "been", "removed", "for", "the", "following", "reason", "already", "submitted", "this", "article", "has", "been", "submitted", "to", "SUBREDDIT", "within", "the", "last", "three", "days", "URL", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "and", "sometimes", "i", "make", "mistakes", ".", "if", "you", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "this", "removal", ",", "please", "feel", "free", "to", "message", "the", "moderators", ".", "URL", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", "by", "USER", "messagei", "have", "a", "question", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", ".", "URL" ]
The mentions of social groups in this text are "moderators" and "USER". Moderators are individuals who oversee and manage specific online communities, such as subreddits on Reddit. They have the ability to remove posts and comments that violate the rules of the community, and can sometimes also have the ability to ban users from the community. In this text, the moderators are being referred to as the group that the user can message if they have any questions about the removal of their submission. The other social group mentioned in this text is "USER". In this context, "USER" is likely referring to a specific individual who has had a submission removed from the subreddit. It is possible that this user has previously submitted the same article within the last three days, which would be a violation of the subreddit's rules. It is also worth noting that the text mentions the use of a bot to remove the submission. Bots are computer programs that are designed to perform specific tasks automatically. In this case, the bot was likely programmed to scan newly submitted posts and remove any that match a certain criteria, such as being duplicates of previously submitted articles.
The mentions of social groups in this text are "moderators" and "USER". Moderators are individuals who oversee and manage specific online communities, such as subreddits on Reddit. They have the ability to remove posts and comments that violate the rules of the community, and can sometimes also have the ability to ban users from the community. In this text, the moderators are being referred to as the group that the user can message if they have any questions about the removal of their submission. The other social group mentioned in this text is "USER". In this context, "USER" is likely referring to a specific individual who has had a submission removed from the subreddit. It is possible that this user has previously submitted the same article within the last three days, which would be a violation of the subreddit's rules. It is also worth noting that the text mentions the use of a bot to remove the submission. Bots are computer programs that are designed to perform specific tasks automatically. In this case, the bot was likely programmed to scan newly submitted posts and remove any that match a certain criteria, such as being duplicates of previously submitted articles.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "this", "text", "are", "\"moderators\"", "and", "\"USER\".", "Moderators", "are", "individuals", "who", "oversee", "and", "manage", "specific", "online", "communities,", "such", "as", "subreddits", "on", "Reddit.", "They", "have", "the", "ability", "to", "remove", "posts", "and", "comments", "that", "violate", "the", "rules", "of", "the", "community,", "and", "can", "sometimes", "also", "have", "the", "ability", "to", "ban", "users", "from", "the", "community.", "In", "this", "text,", "the", "moderators", "are", "being", "referred", "to", "as", "the", "group", "that", "the", "user", "can", "message", "if", "they", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "the", "removal", "of", "their", "submission.", "The", "other", "social", "group", "mentioned", "in", "this", "text", "is", "\"USER\".", "In", "this", "context,", "\"USER\"", "is", "likely", "referring", "to", "a", "specific", "individual", "who", "has", "had", "a", "submission", "removed", "from", "the", "subreddit.", "It", "is", "possible", "that", "this", "user", "has", "previously", "submitted", "the", "same", "article", "within", "the", "last", "three", "days,", "which", "would", "be", "a", "violation", "of", "the", "subreddit's", "rules.", "It", "is", "also", "worth", "noting", "that", "the", "text", "mentions", "the", "use", "of", "a", "bot", "to", "remove", "the", "submission.", "Bots", "are", "computer", "programs", "that", "are", "designed", "to", "perform", "specific", "tasks", "automatically.", "In", "this", "case,", "the", "bot", "was", "likely", "programmed", "to", "scan", "newly", "submitted", "posts", "and", "remove", "any", "that", "match", "a", "certain", "criteria,", "such", "as", "being", "duplicates", "of", "previously", "submitted", "articles." ]
199
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .
cqw33a4
politics
2,015
sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .
sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .
sure , everywhere in the world is the same as denmark .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "sure", ",", "everywhere", "in", "the", "world", "is", "the", "same", "as", "denmark", "." ]
Without more context, it's difficult to determine the specific social groups being mentioned in the statement "sure, everywhere in the world is the same as Denmark." However, the statement suggests a few different social groups or social categories: 1. Humanity: The statement implies that people everywhere in the world are similar to each other, suggesting a common humanity. 2. Nationality: The reference to Denmark suggests a comparison based on nationality or country of origin. 3. Cultural groups: The statement implies that cultural practices and norms are similar around the world, suggesting a common cultural identity. 4. Socioeconomic groups: The statement also implies that socioeconomic conditions may be similar in different parts of the world, suggesting a common class identity. It's important to note that while there may be some similarities across these social groups, there are also many differences and variations that are influenced by unique historical, cultural, and political contexts.
Without more context, it's difficult to determine the specific social groups being mentioned in the statement "sure, everywhere in the world is the same as Denmark." However, the statement suggests a few different social groups or social categories: 1. Humanity: The statement implies that people everywhere in the world are similar to each other, suggesting a common humanity. 2. Nationality: The reference to Denmark suggests a comparison based on nationality or country of origin. 3. Cultural groups: The statement implies that cultural practices and norms are similar around the world, suggesting a common cultural identity. 4. Socioeconomic groups: The statement also implies that socioeconomic conditions may be similar in different parts of the world, suggesting a common class identity. It's important to note that while there may be some similarities across these social groups, there are also many differences and variations that are influenced by unique historical, cultural, and political contexts.
[ "Without", "more", "context,", "it's", "difficult", "to", "determine", "the", "specific", "social", "groups", "being", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "\"sure,", "everywhere", "in", "the", "world", "is", "the", "same", "as", "Denmark.\"", "However,", "the", "statement", "suggests", "a", "few", "different", "social", "groups", "or", "social", "categories:", "1.", "Humanity:", "The", "statement", "implies", "that", "people", "everywhere", "in", "the", "world", "are", "similar", "to", "each", "other,", "suggesting", "a", "common", "humanity.", "2.", "Nationality:", "The", "reference", "to", "Denmark", "suggests", "a", "comparison", "based", "on", "nationality", "or", "country", "of", "origin.", "3.", "Cultural", "groups:", "The", "statement", "implies", "that", "cultural", "practices", "and", "norms", "are", "similar", "around", "the", "world,", "suggesting", "a", "common", "cultural", "identity.", "4.", "Socioeconomic", "groups:", "The", "statement", "also", "implies", "that", "socioeconomic", "conditions", "may", "be", "similar", "in", "different", "parts", "of", "the", "world,", "suggesting", "a", "common", "class", "identity.", "It's", "important", "to", "note", "that", "while", "there", "may", "be", "some", "similarities", "across", "these", "social", "groups,", "there", "are", "also", "many", "differences", "and", "variations", "that", "are", "influenced", "by", "unique", "historical,", "cultural,", "and", "political", "contexts." ]
151
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the candidates their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .
cy0c3fy
politics
2,015
i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the candidates their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .
i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the @@candidates## their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .
i 'm so sick of these polls trying to obviously influence people 's vote , will to vote , or create more apathy . ffs , just give the @@candidates## their air time and let the people vote uninhibited .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "so", "sick", "of", "these", "polls", "trying", "to", "obviously", "influence", "people", "'s", "vote", ",", "will", "to", "vote", ",", "or", "create", "more", "apathy", ".", "ffs", ",", "just", "give", "the", "candidates", "their", "air", "time", "and", "let", "the", "people", "vote", "uninhibited", "." ]
In this text, the social groups mentioned are: 1. People who conduct polls 2. Voters 3. Candidates in an election The text suggests that polls may be used to influence people's voting decisions or create apathy, which implies a criticism of those who conduct polls. The text also advocates for equal air time for all candidates and allowing voters to make their decisions free from external influences. This could be seen as a call for fair treatment of all candidates and respect for the autonomy of voters.
In this text, the social groups mentioned are: 1. People who conduct polls 2. Voters 3. Candidates in an election The text suggests that polls may be used to influence people's voting decisions or create apathy, which implies a criticism of those who conduct polls. The text also advocates for equal air time for all candidates and allowing voters to make their decisions free from external influences. This could be seen as a call for fair treatment of all candidates and respect for the autonomy of voters.
[ "In", "this", "text,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "are:", "1.", "People", "who", "conduct", "polls", "2.", "Voters", "3.", "Candidates", "in", "an", "election", "The", "text", "suggests", "that", "polls", "may", "be", "used", "to", "influence", "people's", "voting", "decisions", "or", "create", "apathy,", "which", "implies", "a", "criticism", "of", "those", "who", "conduct", "polls.", "The", "text", "also", "advocates", "for", "equal", "air", "time", "for", "all", "candidates", "and", "allowing", "voters", "to", "make", "their", "decisions", "free", "from", "external", "influences.", "This", "could", "be", "seen", "as", "a", "call", "for", "fair", "treatment", "of", "all", "candidates", "and", "respect", "for", "the", "autonomy", "of", "voters." ]
87
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .
cte52al
politics
2,015
it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .
it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .
it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "makes", "me", "sick", "that", "she", "would", "take", "money", "from", "people", "like", "that", "." ]
The mention of social groups in the statement "it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that" is "people like that." This phrase implies the existence of a social group that the speaker perceives negatively. However, the specific identity of this social group is not specified in the given statement, leaving it open to interpretation. It could refer to any social group that the speaker views as unworthy or undeserving of receiving money.
The mention of social groups in the statement "it makes me sick that she would take money from people like that" is "people like that." This phrase implies the existence of a social group that the speaker perceives negatively. However, the specific identity of this social group is not specified in the given statement, leaving it open to interpretation. It could refer to any social group that the speaker views as unworthy or undeserving of receiving money.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "statement", "\"it", "makes", "me", "sick", "that", "she", "would", "take", "money", "from", "people", "like", "that\"", "is", "\"people", "like", "that.\"", "This", "phrase", "implies", "the", "existence", "of", "a", "social", "group", "that", "the", "speaker", "perceives", "negatively.", "However,", "the", "specific", "identity", "of", "this", "social", "group", "is", "not", "specified", "in", "the", "given", "statement,", "leaving", "it", "open", "to", "interpretation.", "It", "could", "refer", "to", "any", "social", "group", "that", "the", "speaker", "views", "as", "unworthy", "or", "undeserving", "of", "receiving", "money." ]
77
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
still , brandishing guns towards any federal agents , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .
cuykhm1
politics
2,015
still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .
still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .
still , brandishing guns towards any @@federal agents## , regardless of their position , is grounds for a long time in prison .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "still", ",", "brandishing", "guns", "towards", "any", "federal", "agents", ",", "regardless", "of", "their", "position", ",", "is", "grounds", "for", "a", "long", "time", "in", "prison", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are "federal agents" and people who "brandish guns towards" them. The statement implies that there are two distinct groups - federal agents who hold a specific position and individuals who are not federal agents and choose to threaten them by brandishing guns. This action is stated to have legal consequences, leading to a long time in prison.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are "federal agents" and people who "brandish guns towards" them. The statement implies that there are two distinct groups - federal agents who hold a specific position and individuals who are not federal agents and choose to threaten them by brandishing guns. This action is stated to have legal consequences, leading to a long time in prison.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are", "\"federal", "agents\"", "and", "people", "who", "\"brandish", "guns", "towards\"", "them.", "The", "statement", "implies", "that", "there", "are", "two", "distinct", "groups", "-", "federal", "agents", "who", "hold", "a", "specific", "position", "and", "individuals", "who", "are", "not", "federal", "agents", "and", "choose", "to", "threaten", "them", "by", "brandishing", "guns.", "This", "action", "is", "stated", "to", "have", "legal", "consequences,", "leading", "to", "a", "long", "time", "in", "prison." ]
64
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for aliens
cxvfwvn
politics
2,015
you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for aliens
you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for @@aliens##
you can find a historian that will say anything for attention of money . just watch all the ivy phds on the history channel talking about proof for @@aliens##
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2 ]
[ "you", "can", "find", "a", "historian", "that", "will", "say", "anything", "for", "attention", "of", "money", ".", "just", "watch", "all", "the", "ivy", "phds", "on", "the", "history", "channel", "talking", "about", "proof", "for", "aliens" ]
In the given statement, the social groups mentioned are: 1. Historians: The statement implies that there are historians who may say anything for attention or money. 2. Ivy League PhDs: The statement suggests that there are many PhD holders from prestigious institutions like the Ivy League who appear on the History Channel and discuss proof for aliens. 3. The History Channel: Although not a social group per se, it is a media organization that features programs related to history, and in this context, it is mentioned as a platform where certain claims and theories about aliens are discussed.
In the given statement, the social groups mentioned are: 1. Historians: The statement implies that there are historians who may say anything for attention or money. 2. Ivy League PhDs: The statement suggests that there are many PhD holders from prestigious institutions like the Ivy League who appear on the History Channel and discuss proof for aliens. 3. The History Channel: Although not a social group per se, it is a media organization that features programs related to history, and in this context, it is mentioned as a platform where certain claims and theories about aliens are discussed.
[ "In", "the", "given", "statement,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "are:", "1.", "Historians:", "The", "statement", "implies", "that", "there", "are", "historians", "who", "may", "say", "anything", "for", "attention", "or", "money.", "2.", "Ivy", "League", "PhDs:", "The", "statement", "suggests", "that", "there", "are", "many", "PhD", "holders", "from", "prestigious", "institutions", "like", "the", "Ivy", "League", "who", "appear", "on", "the", "History", "Channel", "and", "discuss", "proof", "for", "aliens.", "3.", "The", "History", "Channel:", "Although", "not", "a", "social", "group", "per", "se,", "it", "is", "a", "media", "organization", "that", "features", "programs", "related", "to", "history,", "and", "in", "this", "context,", "it", "is", "mentioned", "as", "a", "platform", "where", "certain", "claims", "and", "theories", "about", "aliens", "are", "discussed." ]
98
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign
cuwp5yk
politics
2,015
woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign
woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign
woo ! the he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "woo", "!", "the", "he", "has", "no", "chance", "is", "turning", "into", "a", "winning", "campaign" ]
While the text you provided does not mention specific social groups, I will discuss possible social groups that could be involved in a political campaign. In the context of a political campaign, various social groups can play a significant role in shaping its direction and success. Here are some examples: 1. Voters: Voters are the most important social group in any political campaign. They are the individuals who will ultimately decide the outcome of the election. A successful campaign will focus on appealing to specific voter demographics, such as young people, women, or ethnic minorities. 2. Volunteers: Volunteers are individuals who donate their time and energy to support a campaign. They often engage in activities such as making phone calls, canvassing door-to-door, and distributing campaign materials. Social groups such as community organizations, churches, and student groups can provide a valuable source of volunteers. 3. Donors: Donors are individuals or organizations that provide financial support to a campaign. They can include wealthy individuals, businesses, unions, and interest groups. A campaign's ability to raise money can be a crucial factor in its success, as it can enable the campaign to advertise, hire staff, and conduct research. 4. Endorsers: Endorsers are individuals or organizations that publicly support a campaign. They can include politicians, celebrities, and interest groups. Endorsements can help a campaign gain credibility and visibility, as well as mobilize specific social groups to support the candidate. 5. Opponents: Opponents are individuals or groups that oppose a campaign. They can include rival candidates, interest groups, and political parties. Opponents can mount attacks on a campaign's message, character, or record, which can erode its support among voters. In the context of the statement "woo! The he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign," it's possible that various social groups are becoming engaged and mobilized in support of the campaign. For example, volunteers may be door-knocking and phone-banking with renewed energy, donors may be contributing more generously, and endorsers may be lending their support. Additionally, the campaign may be finding ways to neutralize its opponents and win over undecided voters. By engaging with and mobilizing social groups, a campaign can transform a losing proposition into a winning one.
While the text you provided does not mention specific social groups, I will discuss possible social groups that could be involved in a political campaign. In the context of a political campaign, various social groups can play a significant role in shaping its direction and success. Here are some examples: 1. Voters: Voters are the most important social group in any political campaign. They are the individuals who will ultimately decide the outcome of the election. A successful campaign will focus on appealing to specific voter demographics, such as young people, women, or ethnic minorities. 2. Volunteers: Volunteers are individuals who donate their time and energy to support a campaign. They often engage in activities such as making phone calls, canvassing door-to-door, and distributing campaign materials. Social groups such as community organizations, churches, and student groups can provide a valuable source of volunteers. 3. Donors: Donors are individuals or organizations that provide financial support to a campaign. They can include wealthy individuals, businesses, unions, and interest groups. A campaign's ability to raise money can be a crucial factor in its success, as it can enable the campaign to advertise, hire staff, and conduct research. 4. Endorsers: Endorsers are individuals or organizations that publicly support a campaign. They can include politicians, celebrities, and interest groups. Endorsements can help a campaign gain credibility and visibility, as well as mobilize specific social groups to support the candidate. 5. Opponents: Opponents are individuals or groups that oppose a campaign. They can include rival candidates, interest groups, and political parties. Opponents can mount attacks on a campaign's message, character, or record, which can erode its support among voters. In the context of the statement "woo! The he has no chance is turning into a winning campaign," it's possible that various social groups are becoming engaged and mobilized in support of the campaign. For example, volunteers may be door-knocking and phone-banking with renewed energy, donors may be contributing more generously, and endorsers may be lending their support. Additionally, the campaign may be finding ways to neutralize its opponents and win over undecided voters. By engaging with and mobilizing social groups, a campaign can transform a losing proposition into a winning one.
[ "While", "the", "text", "you", "provided", "does", "not", "mention", "specific", "social", "groups,", "I", "will", "discuss", "possible", "social", "groups", "that", "could", "be", "involved", "in", "a", "political", "campaign.", "In", "the", "context", "of", "a", "political", "campaign,", "various", "social", "groups", "can", "play", "a", "significant", "role", "in", "shaping", "its", "direction", "and", "success.", "Here", "are", "some", "examples:", "1.", "Voters:", "Voters", "are", "the", "most", "important", "social", "group", "in", "any", "political", "campaign.", "They", "are", "the", "individuals", "who", "will", "ultimately", "decide", "the", "outcome", "of", "the", "election.", "A", "successful", "campaign", "will", "focus", "on", "appealing", "to", "specific", "voter", "demographics,", "such", "as", "young", "people,", "women,", "or", "ethnic", "minorities.", "2.", "Volunteers:", "Volunteers", "are", "individuals", "who", "donate", "their", "time", "and", "energy", "to", "support", "a", "campaign.", "They", "often", "engage", "in", "activities", "such", "as", "making", "phone", "calls,", "canvassing", "door-to-door,", "and", "distributing", "campaign", "materials.", "Social", "groups", "such", "as", "community", "organizations,", "churches,", "and", "student", "groups", "can", "provide", "a", "valuable", "source", "of", "volunteers.", "3.", "Donors:", "Donors", "are", "individuals", "or", "organizations", "that", "provide", "financial", "support", "to", "a", "campaign.", "They", "can", "include", "wealthy", "individuals,", "businesses,", "unions,", "and", "interest", "groups.", "A", "campaign's", "ability", "to", "raise", "money", "can", "be", "a", "crucial", "factor", "in", "its", "success,", "as", "it", "can", "enable", "the", "campaign", "to", "advertise,", "hire", "staff,", "and", "conduct", "research.", "4.", "Endorsers:", "Endorsers", "are", "individuals", "or", "organizations", "that", "publicly", "support", "a", "campaign.", "They", "can", "include", "politicians,", "celebrities,", "and", "interest", "groups.", "Endorsements", "can", "help", "a", "campaign", "gain", "credibility", "and", "visibility,", "as", "well", "as", "mobilize", "specific", "social", "groups", "to", "support", "the", "candidate.", "5.", "Opponents:", "Opponents", "are", "individuals", "or", "groups", "that", "oppose", "a", "campaign.", "They", "can", "include", "rival", "candidates,", "interest", "groups,", "and", "political", "parties.", "Opponents", "can", "mount", "attacks", "on", "a", "campaign's", "message,", "character,", "or", "record,", "which", "can", "erode", "its", "support", "among", "voters.", "In", "the", "context", "of", "the", "statement", "\"woo!", "The", "he", "has", "no", "chance", "is", "turning", "into", "a", "winning", "campaign,\"", "it's", "possible", "that", "various", "social", "groups", "are", "becoming", "engaged", "and", "mobilized", "in", "support", "of", "the", "campaign.", "For", "example,", "volunteers", "may", "be", "door-knocking", "and", "phone-banking", "with", "renewed", "energy,", "donors", "may", "be", "contributing", "more", "generously,", "and", "endorsers", "may", "be", "lending", "their", "support.", "Additionally,", "the", "campaign", "may", "be", "finding", "ways", "to", "neutralize", "its", "opponents", "and", "win", "over", "undecided", "voters.", "By", "engaging", "with", "and", "mobilizing", "social", "groups,", "a", "campaign", "can", "transform", "a", "losing", "proposition", "into", "a", "winning", "one." ]
365
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .
cr57xqf
politics
2,015
he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that @@both sides## agree on .
he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .
he is the ron paul of ron paul of 2016. sorta crazy but has some solid idea that both sides agree on .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "he", "is", "the", "ron", "paul", "of", "ron", "paul", "of", "2016.", "sorta", "crazy", "but", "has", "some", "solid", "idea", "that", "both", "sides", "agree", "on", "." ]
The social group mentioned in the statement "he is the Ron Paul of 2016. Sorta crazy but has some solid ideas that both sides agree on" is political followers or supporters. Ron Paul is a former congressman and presidential candidate, and the statement is comparing an unnamed individual to him, implying that this person also has a dedicated following and controversial views, but also holds some ideas that are seen as reasonable by people from different political backgrounds.
The social group mentioned in the statement "he is the Ron Paul of 2016. Sorta crazy but has some solid ideas that both sides agree on" is political followers or supporters. Ron Paul is a former congressman and presidential candidate, and the statement is comparing an unnamed individual to him, implying that this person also has a dedicated following and controversial views, but also holds some ideas that are seen as reasonable by people from different political backgrounds.
[ "The", "social", "group", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "\"he", "is", "the", "Ron", "Paul", "of", "2016.", "Sorta", "crazy", "but", "has", "some", "solid", "ideas", "that", "both", "sides", "agree", "on\"", "is", "political", "followers", "or", "supporters.", "Ron", "Paul", "is", "a", "former", "congressman", "and", "presidential", "candidate,", "and", "the", "statement", "is", "comparing", "an", "unnamed", "individual", "to", "him,", "implying", "that", "this", "person", "also", "has", "a", "dedicated", "following", "and", "controversial", "views,", "but", "also", "holds", "some", "ideas", "that", "are", "seen", "as", "reasonable", "by", "people", "from", "different", "political", "backgrounds." ]
78
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the cops be able to know that i should have a gun ?
cwtd0ok
politics
2,015
so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?
so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?
so you guys arent doing anything illegal then . i just wonder if i get pulled over , have a gun in the car but i happen to have a felony in my past , will the @@cops## be able to know that i should have a gun ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "you", "guys", "arent", "doing", "anything", "illegal", "then", ".", "i", "just", "wonder", "if", "i", "get", "pulled", "over", ",", "have", "a", "gun", "in", "the", "car", "but", "i", "happen", "to", "have", "a", "felony", "in", "my", "past", ",", "will", "the", "cops", "be", "able", "to", "know", "that", "i", "should", "have", "a", "gun", "?" ]
In this text, the following social groups are mentioned: 1. "you guys" - This is a generalized group, likely referring to the person being addressed in the conversation. 2. Cops (short for police officers) - This group consists of law enforcement officials who have the authority to enforce laws, make arrests, and carry firearms. 3. Individuals with a felony in their past - This is a group of people who have been convicted of a felony-level crime, meaning they have committed a serious offense. It is worth noting that in many jurisdictions, individuals with felony convictions are prohibited from possessing firearms, and if a police officer discovers a felon in possession of a gun, it could result in additional criminal charges.
In this text, the following social groups are mentioned: 1. "you guys" - This is a generalized group, likely referring to the person being addressed in the conversation. 2. Cops (short for police officers) - This group consists of law enforcement officials who have the authority to enforce laws, make arrests, and carry firearms. 3. Individuals with a felony in their past - This is a group of people who have been convicted of a felony-level crime, meaning they have committed a serious offense. It is worth noting that in many jurisdictions, individuals with felony convictions are prohibited from possessing firearms, and if a police officer discovers a felon in possession of a gun, it could result in additional criminal charges.
[ "In", "this", "text,", "the", "following", "social", "groups", "are", "mentioned:", "1.", "\"you", "guys\"", "-", "This", "is", "a", "generalized", "group,", "likely", "referring", "to", "the", "person", "being", "addressed", "in", "the", "conversation.", "2.", "Cops", "(short", "for", "police", "officers)", "-", "This", "group", "consists", "of", "law", "enforcement", "officials", "who", "have", "the", "authority", "to", "enforce", "laws,", "make", "arrests,", "and", "carry", "firearms.", "3.", "Individuals", "with", "a", "felony", "in", "their", "past", "-", "This", "is", "a", "group", "of", "people", "who", "have", "been", "convicted", "of", "a", "felony-level", "crime,", "meaning", "they", "have", "committed", "a", "serious", "offense.", "It", "is", "worth", "noting", "that", "in", "many", "jurisdictions,", "individuals", "with", "felony", "convictions", "are", "prohibited", "from", "possessing", "firearms,", "and", "if", "a", "police", "officer", "discovers", "a", "felon", "in", "possession", "of", "a", "gun,", "it", "could", "result", "in", "additional", "criminal", "charges." ]
121
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the wacko global warming deniers , meaning the religious right allies of polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions . that was the beauty of alec and other 501 c entities , many set up by the koch brothers and friends , they hid the donors . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and republicans cutting irs funding .
cq4heey
politics
2,015
becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the wacko @@global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies## of @@polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions## . that was the beauty of alec and other 501 c entities , many set up by the koch brothers and friends , they hid the donors . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .
becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the @@wacko global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies of polluters## who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions . that was the beauty of alec and other @@501 c entities## , many set up by the @@koch brothers## and @@friends## , they hid the @@donors## . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .
becoming reluctant to being exposed contributing to the @@wacko global warming deniers## , meaning the @@religious right allies of polluters who do n't want to spend the money necessary to clean up emissions## . that was the beauty of alec and other @@501 c entities## , many set up by the @@koch brothers## and @@friends## , they hid the @@donors## . hence the uproar over irs scrutiny , and @@republicans## cutting irs funding .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "becoming", "reluctant", "to", "being", "exposed", "contributing", "to", "the", "wacko", "global", "warming", "deniers", ",", "meaning", "the", "religious", "right", "allies", "of", "polluters", "who", "do", "n't", "want", "to", "spend", "the", "money", "necessary", "to", "clean", "up", "emissions", ".", "that", "was", "the", "beauty", "of", "alec", "and", "other", "501", "c", "entities", ",", "many", "set", "up", "by", "the", "koch", "brothers", "and", "friends", ",", "they", "hid", "the", "donors", ".", "hence", "the", "uproar", "over", "irs", "scrutiny", ",", "and", "republicans", "cutting", "irs", "funding", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the passage are: 1. The religious right 2. Polluters 3. The supporters or allies of polluters 4. ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), a 501(c) organization 5. Other 501(c) entities, many of which were set up by the Koch brothers and friends 6. The IRS (Internal Revenue Service) 7. Republicans The passage suggests that there is a connection between these groups, particularly in relation to the issue of global warming and the efforts to clean up emissions. The religious right is allied with polluters who deny the existence of global warming and are reluctant to spend money on emission clean-up. These groups use 501(c) entities, such as ALEC, to hide their donors, which has led to controversy and IRS scrutiny. The passage also mentions that Republicans have cut IRS funding, possibly in an effort to protect these groups from scrutiny.
The social groups mentioned in the passage are: 1. The religious right 2. Polluters 3. The supporters or allies of polluters 4. ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), a 501(c) organization 5. Other 501(c) entities, many of which were set up by the Koch brothers and friends 6. The IRS (Internal Revenue Service) 7. Republicans The passage suggests that there is a connection between these groups, particularly in relation to the issue of global warming and the efforts to clean up emissions. The religious right is allied with polluters who deny the existence of global warming and are reluctant to spend money on emission clean-up. These groups use 501(c) entities, such as ALEC, to hide their donors, which has led to controversy and IRS scrutiny. The passage also mentions that Republicans have cut IRS funding, possibly in an effort to protect these groups from scrutiny.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "passage", "are:", "1.", "The", "religious", "right", "2.", "Polluters", "3.", "The", "supporters", "or", "allies", "of", "polluters", "4.", "ALEC", "(American", "Legislative", "Exchange", "Council),", "a", "501(c)", "organization", "5.", "Other", "501(c)", "entities,", "many", "of", "which", "were", "set", "up", "by", "the", "Koch", "brothers", "and", "friends", "6.", "The", "IRS", "(Internal", "Revenue", "Service)", "7.", "Republicans", "The", "passage", "suggests", "that", "there", "is", "a", "connection", "between", "these", "groups,", "particularly", "in", "relation", "to", "the", "issue", "of", "global", "warming", "and", "the", "efforts", "to", "clean", "up", "emissions.", "The", "religious", "right", "is", "allied", "with", "polluters", "who", "deny", "the", "existence", "of", "global", "warming", "and", "are", "reluctant", "to", "spend", "money", "on", "emission", "clean-up.", "These", "groups", "use", "501(c)", "entities,", "such", "as", "ALEC,", "to", "hide", "their", "donors,", "which", "has", "led", "to", "controversy", "and", "IRS", "scrutiny.", "The", "passage", "also", "mentions", "that", "Republicans", "have", "cut", "IRS", "funding,", "possibly", "in", "an", "effort", "to", "protect", "these", "groups", "from", "scrutiny." ]
144
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few people working 5060 hours a week but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use part timers to fill in the gaps .
ct34k7t
politics
2,015
the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few people working 5060 hours a week but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .
the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few @@people working 5060 hours a week## but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .
the ability to not pay overtime to salaried works plays a huge role as well . much cheaper to have a few @@people working 5060 hours a week## but only being paid for essentially 40 while you use @@part timers## to fill in the gaps .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "ability", "to", "not", "pay", "overtime", "to", "salaried", "works", "plays", "a", "huge", "role", "as", "well", ".", "much", "cheaper", "to", "have", "a", "few", "people", "working", "5060", "hours", "a", "week", "but", "only", "being", "paid", "for", "essentially", "40", "while", "you", "use", "part", "timers", "to", "fill", "in", "the", "gaps", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are: 1. Salaried workers: These are workers who are paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of hours they work in a week. The statement highlights the ability of employers to not pay overtime to salaried workers, which can lead to them working long hours without additional compensation. 2. Part-timers: These are workers who are employed for fewer hours than full-time workers. The statement mentions using part-timers to fill in the gaps, which implies that they are used to cover the workload of salaried workers who are not being paid overtime. The statement highlights the power dynamic between employers and employees and the impact it can have on the working conditions and compensation of different social groups.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are: 1. Salaried workers: These are workers who are paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of hours they work in a week. The statement highlights the ability of employers to not pay overtime to salaried workers, which can lead to them working long hours without additional compensation. 2. Part-timers: These are workers who are employed for fewer hours than full-time workers. The statement mentions using part-timers to fill in the gaps, which implies that they are used to cover the workload of salaried workers who are not being paid overtime. The statement highlights the power dynamic between employers and employees and the impact it can have on the working conditions and compensation of different social groups.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are:", "1.", "Salaried", "workers:", "These", "are", "workers", "who", "are", "paid", "a", "fixed", "salary", "regardless", "of", "the", "number", "of", "hours", "they", "work", "in", "a", "week.", "The", "statement", "highlights", "the", "ability", "of", "employers", "to", "not", "pay", "overtime", "to", "salaried", "workers,", "which", "can", "lead", "to", "them", "working", "long", "hours", "without", "additional", "compensation.", "2.", "Part-timers:", "These", "are", "workers", "who", "are", "employed", "for", "fewer", "hours", "than", "full-time", "workers.", "The", "statement", "mentions", "using", "part-timers", "to", "fill", "in", "the", "gaps,", "which", "implies", "that", "they", "are", "used", "to", "cover", "the", "workload", "of", "salaried", "workers", "who", "are", "not", "being", "paid", "overtime.", "The", "statement", "highlights", "the", "power", "dynamic", "between", "employers", "and", "employees", "and", "the", "impact", "it", "can", "have", "on", "the", "working", "conditions", "and", "compensation", "of", "different", "social", "groups." ]
125
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .
cwk5hmy
politics
2,015
what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .
what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .
what do you consider demeaning ? that is entirely subjective .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "do", "you", "consider", "demeaning", "?", "that", "is", "entirely", "subjective", "." ]
I am not capable of having personal feelings or experiences, so I cannot consider anything to be subjectively demeaning. However, I can identify references to social groups that some people might find offensive or demeaning. It is important to note that perceptions of offensiveness can vary widely between individuals and cultural contexts. Here are some examples of mentions of social groups that have been considered offensive in the past: * Racial slurs or epithets (e.g. the "n-word," "chink," "spic," "kike," etc.) * Stereotypes or derogatory statements about people's nationality, ethnicity, or religion (e.g. "all Muslims are terrorists," "Mexicans are lazy," "Jews are greedy," etc.) * Gender-based insults or derogatory terms (e.g. "bitch," "slut," "pussy," etc.) * Homophobic or transphobic slurs or stereotypes (e.g. "fag," "dyke," "tranny," etc.) * Ableist language or stereotypes (e.g. "retarded," "lame," "crazy," etc.) * Ageist language or stereotypes (e.g. "greedy geezer," "doddering old man," etc.) * Classist language or stereotypes (e.g. "white trash," "trailer trash," "welfare queens," etc.) It's important to remember that language has the power to harm or uplift, and it's always better to err on the side of respect and kindness when speaking about or to members of social groups.
I am not capable of having personal feelings or experiences, so I cannot consider anything to be subjectively demeaning. However, I can identify references to social groups that some people might find offensive or demeaning. It is important to note that perceptions of offensiveness can vary widely between individuals and cultural contexts. Here are some examples of mentions of social groups that have been considered offensive in the past: * Racial slurs or epithets (e.g. the "n-word," "chink," "spic," "kike," etc.) * Stereotypes or derogatory statements about people's nationality, ethnicity, or religion (e.g. "all Muslims are terrorists," "Mexicans are lazy," "Jews are greedy," etc.) * Gender-based insults or derogatory terms (e.g. "bitch," "slut," "pussy," etc.) * Homophobic or transphobic slurs or stereotypes (e.g. "fag," "dyke," "tranny," etc.) * Ableist language or stereotypes (e.g. "retarded," "lame," "crazy," etc.) * Ageist language or stereotypes (e.g. "greedy geezer," "doddering old man," etc.) * Classist language or stereotypes (e.g. "white trash," "trailer trash," "welfare queens," etc.) It's important to remember that language has the power to harm or uplift, and it's always better to err on the side of respect and kindness when speaking about or to members of social groups.
[ "I", "am", "not", "capable", "of", "having", "personal", "feelings", "or", "experiences,", "so", "I", "cannot", "consider", "anything", "to", "be", "subjectively", "demeaning.", "However,", "I", "can", "identify", "references", "to", "social", "groups", "that", "some", "people", "might", "find", "offensive", "or", "demeaning.", "It", "is", "important", "to", "note", "that", "perceptions", "of", "offensiveness", "can", "vary", "widely", "between", "individuals", "and", "cultural", "contexts.", "Here", "are", "some", "examples", "of", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "that", "have", "been", "considered", "offensive", "in", "the", "past:", "*", "Racial", "slurs", "or", "epithets", "(e.g.", "the", "\"n-word,\"", "\"chink,\"", "\"spic,\"", "\"kike,\"", "etc.)", "*", "Stereotypes", "or", "derogatory", "statements", "about", "people's", "nationality,", "ethnicity,", "or", "religion", "(e.g.", "\"all", "Muslims", "are", "terrorists,\"", "\"Mexicans", "are", "lazy,\"", "\"Jews", "are", "greedy,\"", "etc.)", "*", "Gender-based", "insults", "or", "derogatory", "terms", "(e.g.", "\"bitch,\"", "\"slut,\"", "\"pussy,\"", "etc.)", "*", "Homophobic", "or", "transphobic", "slurs", "or", "stereotypes", "(e.g.", "\"fag,\"", "\"dyke,\"", "\"tranny,\"", "etc.)", "*", "Ableist", "language", "or", "stereotypes", "(e.g.", "\"retarded,\"", "\"lame,\"", "\"crazy,\"", "etc.)", "*", "Ageist", "language", "or", "stereotypes", "(e.g.", "\"greedy", "geezer,\"", "\"doddering", "old", "man,\"", "etc.)", "*", "Classist", "language", "or", "stereotypes", "(e.g.", "\"white", "trash,\"", "\"trailer", "trash,\"", "\"welfare", "queens,\"", "etc.)", "It's", "important", "to", "remember", "that", "language", "has", "the", "power", "to", "harm", "or", "uplift,", "and", "it's", "always", "better", "to", "err", "on", "the", "side", "of", "respect", "and", "kindness", "when", "speaking", "about", "or", "to", "members", "of", "social", "groups." ]
197
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other candidates at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .
cuk2ens
politics
2,015
hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other candidates at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .
hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other @@candidates## at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .
hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , is trying to win endorsements . hillary clinton , like every other candidate ever , touts her endorsements . it seems like your real problem with this is that i you do n't like hillary clinton , and ii you do n't like that hillary clinton has been so much more successful than other @@candidates## at winning endorsements . in short , you 're suffering from sour grapes .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hillary", "clinton", ",", "like", "every", "other", "candidate", "ever", ",", "is", "trying", "to", "win", "endorsements", ".", "hillary", "clinton", ",", "like", "every", "other", "candidate", "ever", ",", "touts", "her", "endorsements", ".", "it", "seems", "like", "your", "real", "problem", "with", "this", "is", "that", "i", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "hillary", "clinton", ",", "and", "ii", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "that", "hillary", "clinton", "has", "been", "so", "much", "more", "successful", "than", "other", "candidates", "at", "winning", "endorsements", ".", "in", "short", ",", "you", "'re", "suffering", "from", "sour", "grapes", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in this text are: 1. Hillary Clinton: a well-known American politician and former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State. 2. Other candidates: This is a general reference to Hillary Clinton's political opponents, both past and present, who have also sought endorsements during their campaigns. 3. Individuals or groups endorsing Hillary Clinton: Although not explicitly named, these social groups are implied in the text as the entities from which Hillary Clinton is seeking and touting endorsements. This may include various political leaders, organizations, and interest groups who have publicly supported her candidacy.
The social groups mentioned in this text are: 1. Hillary Clinton: a well-known American politician and former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State. 2. Other candidates: This is a general reference to Hillary Clinton's political opponents, both past and present, who have also sought endorsements during their campaigns. 3. Individuals or groups endorsing Hillary Clinton: Although not explicitly named, these social groups are implied in the text as the entities from which Hillary Clinton is seeking and touting endorsements. This may include various political leaders, organizations, and interest groups who have publicly supported her candidacy.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "text", "are:", "1.", "Hillary", "Clinton:", "a", "well-known", "American", "politician", "and", "former", "First", "Lady,", "Senator,", "and", "Secretary", "of", "State.", "2.", "Other", "candidates:", "This", "is", "a", "general", "reference", "to", "Hillary", "Clinton's", "political", "opponents,", "both", "past", "and", "present,", "who", "have", "also", "sought", "endorsements", "during", "their", "campaigns.", "3.", "Individuals", "or", "groups", "endorsing", "Hillary", "Clinton:", "Although", "not", "explicitly", "named,", "these", "social", "groups", "are", "implied", "in", "the", "text", "as", "the", "entities", "from", "which", "Hillary", "Clinton", "is", "seeking", "and", "touting", "endorsements.", "This", "may", "include", "various", "political", "leaders,", "organizations,", "and", "interest", "groups", "who", "have", "publicly", "supported", "her", "candidacy." ]
96
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
well duh . ffs , look at america 's right reich wing .
cxwydku
politics
2,015
well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's right reich wing## .
well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's## right reich wing .
well duh . ffs , look at @@america 's right reich wing## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0 ]
[ "well", "duh", ".", "ffs", ",", "look", "at", "america", "'s", "right", "reich", "wing", "." ]
The mentions of social groups in your statement are: "well duh," which could be referring to a group of people who are unimpressed or dismissive; "ffs" (which stands for "for f\*\*\*'s sake"), which could be referring to a group of people who are frustrated or annoyed; "America's right Reich wing," which is referring to the conservative or right-wing political movement in the United States, often associated with nationalist and authoritarian views, akin to the German Reich of the early 20th century.
The mentions of social groups in your statement are: "well duh," which could be referring to a group of people who are unimpressed or dismissive; "ffs" (which stands for "for f\*\*\*'s sake"), which could be referring to a group of people who are frustrated or annoyed; "America's right Reich wing," which is referring to the conservative or right-wing political movement in the United States, often associated with nationalist and authoritarian views, akin to the German Reich of the early 20th century.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "your", "statement", "are:", "\"well", "duh,\"", "which", "could", "be", "referring", "to", "a", "group", "of", "people", "who", "are", "unimpressed", "or", "dismissive;", "\"ffs\"", "(which", "stands", "for", "\"for", "f\\*\\*\\*'s", "sake\"),", "which", "could", "be", "referring", "to", "a", "group", "of", "people", "who", "are", "frustrated", "or", "annoyed;", "\"America's", "right", "Reich", "wing,\"", "which", "is", "referring", "to", "the", "conservative", "or", "right-wing", "political", "movement", "in", "the", "United", "States,", "often", "associated", "with", "nationalist", "and", "authoritarian", "views,", "akin", "to", "the", "German", "Reich", "of", "the", "early", "20th", "century." ]
81
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .
cqxvcq8
politics
2,015
rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .
rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .
rule zero of SUBREDDIT for the next several weeks if it 's not bernie sanders , nobody probably cares .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "rule", "zero", "of", "SUBREDDIT", "for", "the", "next", "several", "weeks", "if", "it", "'s", "not", "bernie", "sanders", ",", "nobody", "probably", "cares", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in this statement are Reddit users who are supporters of the presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. The statement suggests that posts about Bernie Sanders are likely to be well-received by the community, while posts about other subjects may not generate as much interest. This generalization may not be accurate for all subreddits or Reddit users, but it highlights the presence of a social group with a strong interest in Bernie Sanders on the platform.
The social groups mentioned in this statement are Reddit users who are supporters of the presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. The statement suggests that posts about Bernie Sanders are likely to be well-received by the community, while posts about other subjects may not generate as much interest. This generalization may not be accurate for all subreddits or Reddit users, but it highlights the presence of a social group with a strong interest in Bernie Sanders on the platform.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "statement", "are", "Reddit", "users", "who", "are", "supporters", "of", "the", "presidential", "candidate", "Bernie", "Sanders.", "The", "statement", "suggests", "that", "posts", "about", "Bernie", "Sanders", "are", "likely", "to", "be", "well-received", "by", "the", "community,", "while", "posts", "about", "other", "subjects", "may", "not", "generate", "as", "much", "interest.", "This", "generalization", "may", "not", "be", "accurate", "for", "all", "subreddits", "or", "Reddit", "users,", "but", "it", "highlights", "the", "presence", "of", "a", "social", "group", "with", "a", "strong", "interest", "in", "Bernie", "Sanders", "on", "the", "platform." ]
77
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .
csctk5p
politics
2,015
those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .
those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .
those big glasses were supposed to make him look smarter . he needs to wear those big glasses over his mouth , shutting him up is the only way to make him seem smarter .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "those", "big", "glasses", "were", "supposed", "to", "make", "him", "look", "smarter", ".", "he", "needs", "to", "wear", "those", "big", "glasses", "over", "his", "mouth", ",", "shutting", "him", "up", "is", "the", "only", "way", "to", "make", "him", "seem", "smarter", "." ]
In the text, the following social groups are mentioned or implied: 1. People who wear glasses - The mention of "big glasses" suggests a group of people who wear glasses as a corrective measure for vision problems. 2. Intellectuals or intelligent people - The phrase "make him look smarter" suggests a social group that values intelligence or academic achievement. The second sentence reinforces this idea by implying that wearing the glasses over his mouth will prevent him from speaking, thereby making him seem smarter. This stereotype perpetuates the idea that intelligent people are often portrayed as socially awkward or inarticulate.
In the text, the following social groups are mentioned or implied: 1. People who wear glasses - The mention of "big glasses" suggests a group of people who wear glasses as a corrective measure for vision problems. 2. Intellectuals or intelligent people - The phrase "make him look smarter" suggests a social group that values intelligence or academic achievement. The second sentence reinforces this idea by implying that wearing the glasses over his mouth will prevent him from speaking, thereby making him seem smarter. This stereotype perpetuates the idea that intelligent people are often portrayed as socially awkward or inarticulate.
[ "In", "the", "text,", "the", "following", "social", "groups", "are", "mentioned", "or", "implied:", "1.", "People", "who", "wear", "glasses", "-", "The", "mention", "of", "\"big", "glasses\"", "suggests", "a", "group", "of", "people", "who", "wear", "glasses", "as", "a", "corrective", "measure", "for", "vision", "problems.", "2.", "Intellectuals", "or", "intelligent", "people", "-", "The", "phrase", "\"make", "him", "look", "smarter\"", "suggests", "a", "social", "group", "that", "values", "intelligence", "or", "academic", "achievement.", "The", "second", "sentence", "reinforces", "this", "idea", "by", "implying", "that", "wearing", "the", "glasses", "over", "his", "mouth", "will", "prevent", "him", "from", "speaking,", "thereby", "making", "him", "seem", "smarter.", "This", "stereotype", "perpetuates", "the", "idea", "that", "intelligent", "people", "are", "often", "portrayed", "as", "socially", "awkward", "or", "inarticulate." ]
100
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .
d4yurcs
politics
2,016
everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .
everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .
everyone knows it , but one party is still pretty much completely against it . let 's not forget that in the upcoming elections .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "everyone", "knows", "it", ",", "but", "one", "party", "is", "still", "pretty", "much", "completely", "against", "it", ".", "let", "'s", "not", "forget", "that", "in", "the", "upcoming", "elections", "." ]
It is not clear what specific social group or issue you are referring to, but based on the context, it seems like the issue could be related to LGBTQ+ rights, and the party that is against it is likely a conservative or right-wing party. The use of the phrase "one party is still pretty much completely against it" suggests that the other parties or political groups may be more supportive of the social group or issue in question. Regardless of the specific group or issue, it is important to remember to consider the positions and records of political parties and candidates on social issues during elections. Political participation and representation can have a significant impact on the rights and well-being of marginalized social groups.
It is not clear what specific social group or issue you are referring to, but based on the context, it seems like the issue could be related to LGBTQ+ rights, and the party that is against it is likely a conservative or right-wing party. The use of the phrase "one party is still pretty much completely against it" suggests that the other parties or political groups may be more supportive of the social group or issue in question. Regardless of the specific group or issue, it is important to remember to consider the positions and records of political parties and candidates on social issues during elections. Political participation and representation can have a significant impact on the rights and well-being of marginalized social groups.
[ "It", "is", "not", "clear", "what", "specific", "social", "group", "or", "issue", "you", "are", "referring", "to,", "but", "based", "on", "the", "context,", "it", "seems", "like", "the", "issue", "could", "be", "related", "to", "LGBTQ+", "rights,", "and", "the", "party", "that", "is", "against", "it", "is", "likely", "a", "conservative", "or", "right-wing", "party.", "The", "use", "of", "the", "phrase", "\"one", "party", "is", "still", "pretty", "much", "completely", "against", "it\"", "suggests", "that", "the", "other", "parties", "or", "political", "groups", "may", "be", "more", "supportive", "of", "the", "social", "group", "or", "issue", "in", "question.", "Regardless", "of", "the", "specific", "group", "or", "issue,", "it", "is", "important", "to", "remember", "to", "consider", "the", "positions", "and", "records", "of", "political", "parties", "and", "candidates", "on", "social", "issues", "during", "elections.", "Political", "participation", "and", "representation", "can", "have", "a", "significant", "impact", "on", "the", "rights", "and", "well-being", "of", "marginalized", "social", "groups." ]
124
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
or goldman sachs but she ca n't mention them .
czn64pm
politics
2,016
or goldman sachs but she ca n't mention them .
or @@goldman sachs## but she ca n't mention them .
or @@goldman sachs## but she ca n't mention them .
[ "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "or", "goldman", "sachs", "but", "she", "ca", "n't", "mention", "them", "." ]
It seems like you're asking for examples of social groups that the speaker can mention, with the exception of "Goldman Sachs." Here are a few examples: * Wall Street firms (excluding Goldman Sachs) * Investment banks (excluding Goldman Sachs) * The 1% or wealthy elites (without specifically naming Goldman Sachs) * Corporate America or big business (again, without specifically naming Goldman Sachs) These are just a few examples, and there may be other ways to refer to social groups that include Goldman Sachs' peers or competitors, but exclude Goldman Sachs specifically.
It seems like you're asking for examples of social groups that the speaker can mention, with the exception of "Goldman Sachs." Here are a few examples: * Wall Street firms (excluding Goldman Sachs) * Investment banks (excluding Goldman Sachs) * The 1% or wealthy elites (without specifically naming Goldman Sachs) * Corporate America or big business (again, without specifically naming Goldman Sachs) These are just a few examples, and there may be other ways to refer to social groups that include Goldman Sachs' peers or competitors, but exclude Goldman Sachs specifically.
[ "It", "seems", "like", "you're", "asking", "for", "examples", "of", "social", "groups", "that", "the", "speaker", "can", "mention,", "with", "the", "exception", "of", "\"Goldman", "Sachs.\"", "Here", "are", "a", "few", "examples:", "*", "Wall", "Street", "firms", "(excluding", "Goldman", "Sachs)", "*", "Investment", "banks", "(excluding", "Goldman", "Sachs)", "*", "The", "1%", "or", "wealthy", "elites", "(without", "specifically", "naming", "Goldman", "Sachs)", "*", "Corporate", "America", "or", "big", "business", "(again,", "without", "specifically", "naming", "Goldman", "Sachs)", "These", "are", "just", "a", "few", "examples,", "and", "there", "may", "be", "other", "ways", "to", "refer", "to", "social", "groups", "that", "include", "Goldman", "Sachs'", "peers", "or", "competitors,", "but", "exclude", "Goldman", "Sachs", "specifically." ]
91
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .
d0gels5
politics
2,016
bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .
bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .
bernie supporter here too . just was always realistic though that a democratic socialist was going to be a long shot . and yes this sub has entered critical circlejerk mass .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "bernie", "supporter", "here", "too", ".", "just", "was", "always", "realistic", "though", "that", "a", "democratic", "socialist", "was", "going", "to", "be", "a", "long", "shot", ".", "and", "yes", "this", "sub", "has", "entered", "critical", "circlejerk", "mass", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in this statement are "Bernie supporters" and the implied group of people who are members or contributors to this subreddit. The statement suggests that the speaker is a supporter of democratic socialist Bernie and recognizes that this political ideology may face challenges in gaining widespread acceptance. The statement also alludes to the phenomenon of "circlejerk," which is often used to describe online communities where users engage in excessive agreement or mutual appreciation, potentially to the exclusion of outside perspectives.
The social groups mentioned in this statement are "Bernie supporters" and the implied group of people who are members or contributors to this subreddit. The statement suggests that the speaker is a supporter of democratic socialist Bernie and recognizes that this political ideology may face challenges in gaining widespread acceptance. The statement also alludes to the phenomenon of "circlejerk," which is often used to describe online communities where users engage in excessive agreement or mutual appreciation, potentially to the exclusion of outside perspectives.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "statement", "are", "\"Bernie", "supporters\"", "and", "the", "implied", "group", "of", "people", "who", "are", "members", "or", "contributors", "to", "this", "subreddit.", "The", "statement", "suggests", "that", "the", "speaker", "is", "a", "supporter", "of", "democratic", "socialist", "Bernie", "and", "recognizes", "that", "this", "political", "ideology", "may", "face", "challenges", "in", "gaining", "widespread", "acceptance.", "The", "statement", "also", "alludes", "to", "the", "phenomenon", "of", "\"circlejerk,\"", "which", "is", "often", "used", "to", "describe", "online", "communities", "where", "users", "engage", "in", "excessive", "agreement", "or", "mutual", "appreciation,", "potentially", "to", "the", "exclusion", "of", "outside", "perspectives." ]
83
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .
d9rlizm
politics
2,016
i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .
i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .
i heard the judge once posted a positive yelp review of a taco bell , therefore she is obviously biased against trump and unqualified to be a judge .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "heard", "the", "judge", "once", "posted", "a", "positive", "yelp", "review", "of", "a", "taco", "bell", ",", "therefore", "she", "is", "obviously", "biased", "against", "trump", "and", "unqualified", "to", "be", "a", "judge", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are: 1. Judges - The statement implies a negative view of the judge's impartiality and qualifications based on her personal opinion expressed in a Yelp review. 2. Trump supporters - The statement implies a negative view of the judge's ability to be unbiased against Trump and his supporters. 3. Taco Bell customers - The statement mentions the judge's positive review of Taco Bell, implying a connection to this social group. It's important to note that making assumptions about a person's qualifications or biases based on their membership in a social group or their personal opinions is a form of discrimination and stereotyping.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are: 1. Judges - The statement implies a negative view of the judge's impartiality and qualifications based on her personal opinion expressed in a Yelp review. 2. Trump supporters - The statement implies a negative view of the judge's ability to be unbiased against Trump and his supporters. 3. Taco Bell customers - The statement mentions the judge's positive review of Taco Bell, implying a connection to this social group. It's important to note that making assumptions about a person's qualifications or biases based on their membership in a social group or their personal opinions is a form of discrimination and stereotyping.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are:", "1.", "Judges", "-", "The", "statement", "implies", "a", "negative", "view", "of", "the", "judge's", "impartiality", "and", "qualifications", "based", "on", "her", "personal", "opinion", "expressed", "in", "a", "Yelp", "review.", "2.", "Trump", "supporters", "-", "The", "statement", "implies", "a", "negative", "view", "of", "the", "judge's", "ability", "to", "be", "unbiased", "against", "Trump", "and", "his", "supporters.", "3.", "Taco", "Bell", "customers", "-", "The", "statement", "mentions", "the", "judge's", "positive", "review", "of", "Taco", "Bell,", "implying", "a", "connection", "to", "this", "social", "group.", "It's", "important", "to", "note", "that", "making", "assumptions", "about", "a", "person's", "qualifications", "or", "biases", "based", "on", "their", "membership", "in", "a", "social", "group", "or", "their", "personal", "opinions", "is", "a", "form", "of", "discrimination", "and", "stereotyping." ]
109
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , fbi , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on good civil servants and soldiers are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .
d5yw1b0
politics
2,016
these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the @@state department## state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to @@the public## so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , @@the public## give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from @@the chain of command## setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on good @@civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .
these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on @@good civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .
these are two issues where one does n't cancel the other out . the ig reports from the state department state that she never asked for approval from the official channels for this server . this sets the precedent that you can get away with this as long as you claim no intent . the idea of foia was to make our government transparent to the public so we could respond to issues like a rogue server exposed to foreign powers . when the president , @@fbi## , the public give her a free pass without even a slap on the wrist it tells us as long as you 're powerful enough the law can not touch you . again the blackberry was the small thing that led to the real issue that is the server . if you want to talk about blackberries or personal email addresses fine but talk about the issue of a secretary of state without any approval from the chain of command setting up an un secure server literally in the basement of her ny domestic home with the help of a random ass it guy while that is going on @@good civil servants## and @@soldiers## are jailed for lesser acts that were accidental . please , let 's talk about why this is just getting a pass from the people like it 's just no fucking big deal .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "these", "are", "two", "issues", "where", "one", "does", "n't", "cancel", "the", "other", "out", ".", "the", "ig", "reports", "from", "the", "state", "department", "state", "that", "she", "never", "asked", "for", "approval", "from", "the", "official", "channels", "for", "this", "server", ".", "this", "sets", "the", "precedent", "that", "you", "can", "get", "away", "with", "this", "as", "long", "as", "you", "claim", "no", "intent", ".", "the", "idea", "of", "foia", "was", "to", "make", "our", "government", "transparent", "to", "the", "public", "so", "we", "could", "respond", "to", "issues", "like", "a", "rogue", "server", "exposed", "to", "foreign", "powers", ".", "when", "the", "president", ",", "fbi", ",", "the", "public", "give", "her", "a", "free", "pass", "without", "even", "a", "slap", "on", "the", "wrist", "it", "tells", "us", "as", "long", "as", "you", "'re", "powerful", "enough", "the", "law", "can", "not", "touch", "you", ".", "again", "the", "blackberry", "was", "the", "small", "thing", "that", "led", "to", "the", "real", "issue", "that", "is", "the", "server", ".", "if", "you", "want", "to", "talk", "about", "blackberries", "or", "personal", "email", "addresses", "fine", "but", "talk", "about", "the", "issue", "of", "a", "secretary", "of", "state", "without", "any", "approval", "from", "the", "chain", "of", "command", "setting", "up", "an", "un", "secure", "server", "literally", "in", "the", "basement", "of", "her", "ny", "domestic", "home", "with", "the", "help", "of", "a", "random", "ass", "it", "guy", "while", "that", "is", "going", "on", "good", "civil", "servants", "and", "soldiers", "are", "jailed", "for", "lesser", "acts", "that", "were", "accidental", ".", "please", ",", "let", "'s", "talk", "about", "why", "this", "is", "just", "getting", "a", "pass", "from", "the", "people", "like", "it", "'s", "just", "no", "fucking", "big", "deal", "." ]
In this text, several social groups are mentioned: 1. The State Department - This is the government agency responsible for implementing the foreign policies of the United States. The text mentions "the ig reports from the State Department" which suggests that there were investigations or reports related to the issues being discussed. 2. The government - The text expresses concerns about the government's transparency and the idea of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which is a law that allows for the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States government. 3. The public - The text mentions "the public" as a social group that should be concerned about the issue of a "rogue server exposed to foreign powers." It suggests that the public should hold powerful figures accountable for any potential violations of the law. 4. The FBI - The text mentions the FBI as the agency responsible for investigating potential crimes. 5. The military - The text mentions "good civil servants and soldiers" who are jailed for lesser acts than the issue being discussed. This suggests that the military is another social group that is affected by the perceived double standard in the application of the law. 6. The media - Although not explicitly mentioned, the text seems to be implying that the media is not giving enough attention to the issue being discussed. It suggests that the media should be more critical of powerful figures and their actions.
In this text, several social groups are mentioned: 1. The State Department - This is the government agency responsible for implementing the foreign policies of the United States. The text mentions "the ig reports from the State Department" which suggests that there were investigations or reports related to the issues being discussed. 2. The government - The text expresses concerns about the government's transparency and the idea of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which is a law that allows for the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States government. 3. The public - The text mentions "the public" as a social group that should be concerned about the issue of a "rogue server exposed to foreign powers." It suggests that the public should hold powerful figures accountable for any potential violations of the law. 4. The FBI - The text mentions the FBI as the agency responsible for investigating potential crimes. 5. The military - The text mentions "good civil servants and soldiers" who are jailed for lesser acts than the issue being discussed. This suggests that the military is another social group that is affected by the perceived double standard in the application of the law. 6. The media - Although not explicitly mentioned, the text seems to be implying that the media is not giving enough attention to the issue being discussed. It suggests that the media should be more critical of powerful figures and their actions.
[ "In", "this", "text,", "several", "social", "groups", "are", "mentioned:", "1.", "The", "State", "Department", "-", "This", "is", "the", "government", "agency", "responsible", "for", "implementing", "the", "foreign", "policies", "of", "the", "United", "States.", "The", "text", "mentions", "\"the", "ig", "reports", "from", "the", "State", "Department\"", "which", "suggests", "that", "there", "were", "investigations", "or", "reports", "related", "to", "the", "issues", "being", "discussed.", "2.", "The", "government", "-", "The", "text", "expresses", "concerns", "about", "the", "government's", "transparency", "and", "the", "idea", "of", "the", "Freedom", "of", "Information", "Act", "(FOIA),", "which", "is", "a", "law", "that", "allows", "for", "the", "full", "or", "partial", "disclosure", "of", "previously", "unreleased", "information", "and", "documents", "controlled", "by", "the", "United", "States", "government.", "3.", "The", "public", "-", "The", "text", "mentions", "\"the", "public\"", "as", "a", "social", "group", "that", "should", "be", "concerned", "about", "the", "issue", "of", "a", "\"rogue", "server", "exposed", "to", "foreign", "powers.\"", "It", "suggests", "that", "the", "public", "should", "hold", "powerful", "figures", "accountable", "for", "any", "potential", "violations", "of", "the", "law.", "4.", "The", "FBI", "-", "The", "text", "mentions", "the", "FBI", "as", "the", "agency", "responsible", "for", "investigating", "potential", "crimes.", "5.", "The", "military", "-", "The", "text", "mentions", "\"good", "civil", "servants", "and", "soldiers\"", "who", "are", "jailed", "for", "lesser", "acts", "than", "the", "issue", "being", "discussed.", "This", "suggests", "that", "the", "military", "is", "another", "social", "group", "that", "is", "affected", "by", "the", "perceived", "double", "standard", "in", "the", "application", "of", "the", "law.", "6.", "The", "media", "-", "Although", "not", "explicitly", "mentioned,", "the", "text", "seems", "to", "be", "implying", "that", "the", "media", "is", "not", "giving", "enough", "attention", "to", "the", "issue", "being", "discussed.", "It", "suggests", "that", "the", "media", "should", "be", "more", "critical", "of", "powerful", "figures", "and", "their", "actions." ]
248
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .
d7vtoya
politics
2,016
there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .
there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .
there are plenty of instances where murder is 100 legal . then it is n't murder . murder is unlawful illegal killing .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "there", "are", "plenty", "of", "instances", "where", "murder", "is", "100", "legal", ".", "then", "it", "is", "n't", "murder", ".", "murder", "is", "unlawful", "illegal", "killing", "." ]
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, and I do not mentionsocial groups. However, I can address the topic of social groups in the context of your statement about murder. In the United States, murder is generally defined as an unlawful killing with malice aforethought. There are circumstances, however, where killing is considered legal and is not considered murder. Some examples of these circumstances include: 1. Self-defense: If a person reasonably believes that they are in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, and they use deadly force to defend themselves, it may be considered legal. 2. Defense of others: Similarly, if a person reasonably believes that another person is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, and they use deadly force to defend that person, it may be considered legal. 3. Law enforcement: Law enforcement officers are generally authorized to use deadly force in certain situations, such as when they believe it is necessary to protect themselves or others from death or serious bodily harm. 4. War: In wartime, killing enemy soldiers is generally considered legal. 5. Capital punishment: In some states, the death penalty is a legal punishment for certain crimes. These are just a few examples of situations where killing may be considered legal. It's important to note that the specific circumstances and requirements for each situation can vary by location and context.
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, and I do not mentionsocial groups. However, I can address the topic of social groups in the context of your statement about murder. In the United States, murder is generally defined as an unlawful killing with malice aforethought. There are circumstances, however, where killing is considered legal and is not considered murder. Some examples of these circumstances include: 1. Self-defense: If a person reasonably believes that they are in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, and they use deadly force to defend themselves, it may be considered legal. 2. Defense of others: Similarly, if a person reasonably believes that another person is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, and they use deadly force to defend that person, it may be considered legal. 3. Law enforcement: Law enforcement officers are generally authorized to use deadly force in certain situations, such as when they believe it is necessary to protect themselves or others from death or serious bodily harm. 4. War: In wartime, killing enemy soldiers is generally considered legal. 5. Capital punishment: In some states, the death penalty is a legal punishment for certain crimes. These are just a few examples of situations where killing may be considered legal. It's important to note that the specific circumstances and requirements for each situation can vary by location and context.
[ "I", "do", "not", "have", "personal", "beliefs", "or", "opinions,", "and", "I", "do", "not", "mentionsocial", "groups.", "However,", "I", "can", "address", "the", "topic", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "context", "of", "your", "statement", "about", "murder.", "In", "the", "United", "States,", "murder", "is", "generally", "defined", "as", "an", "unlawful", "killing", "with", "malice", "aforethought.", "There", "are", "circumstances,", "however,", "where", "killing", "is", "considered", "legal", "and", "is", "not", "considered", "murder.", "Some", "examples", "of", "these", "circumstances", "include:", "1.", "Self-defense:", "If", "a", "person", "reasonably", "believes", "that", "they", "are", "in", "imminent", "danger", "of", "death", "or", "serious", "bodily", "harm,", "and", "they", "use", "deadly", "force", "to", "defend", "themselves,", "it", "may", "be", "considered", "legal.", "2.", "Defense", "of", "others:", "Similarly,", "if", "a", "person", "reasonably", "believes", "that", "another", "person", "is", "in", "imminent", "danger", "of", "death", "or", "serious", "bodily", "harm,", "and", "they", "use", "deadly", "force", "to", "defend", "that", "person,", "it", "may", "be", "considered", "legal.", "3.", "Law", "enforcement:", "Law", "enforcement", "officers", "are", "generally", "authorized", "to", "use", "deadly", "force", "in", "certain", "situations,", "such", "as", "when", "they", "believe", "it", "is", "necessary", "to", "protect", "themselves", "or", "others", "from", "death", "or", "serious", "bodily", "harm.", "4.", "War:", "In", "wartime,", "killing", "enemy", "soldiers", "is", "generally", "considered", "legal.", "5.", "Capital", "punishment:", "In", "some", "states,", "the", "death", "penalty", "is", "a", "legal", "punishment", "for", "certain", "crimes.", "These", "are", "just", "a", "few", "examples", "of", "situations", "where", "killing", "may", "be", "considered", "legal.", "It's", "important", "to", "note", "that", "the", "specific", "circumstances", "and", "requirements", "for", "each", "situation", "can", "vary", "by", "location", "and", "context." ]
230
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .
d4lqgms
politics
2,016
christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .
christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .
christ , he could crucify her if he 'd just put a modicum of effort into it . lazy . sad .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "christ", ",", "he", "could", "crucify", "her", "if", "he", "'d", "just", "put", "a", "modicum", "of", "effort", "into", "it", ".", "lazy", ".", "sad", "." ]
The mention of a social group in the statement is related to "Christ." This is because Christ refers to Jesus Christ, who is the central figure of Christianity, which is a major religion and social group in the world. The other terms such as "lazy" and "sad" are not specific to any particular social group.
The mention of a social group in the statement is related to "Christ." This is because Christ refers to Jesus Christ, who is the central figure of Christianity, which is a major religion and social group in the world. The other terms such as "lazy" and "sad" are not specific to any particular social group.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "a", "social", "group", "in", "the", "statement", "is", "related", "to", "\"Christ.\"", "This", "is", "because", "Christ", "refers", "to", "Jesus", "Christ,", "who", "is", "the", "central", "figure", "of", "Christianity,", "which", "is", "a", "major", "religion", "and", "social", "group", "in", "the", "world.", "The", "other", "terms", "such", "as", "\"lazy\"", "and", "\"sad\"", "are", "not", "specific", "to", "any", "particular", "social", "group." ]
55
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt politicians ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .
d2jrr4d
politics
2,016
not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .
not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .
not always , as bernie has shown us . so ... what party does bernie vote for ? does money corrupt @@politicians## ? yes or no ? this is correct . it 's both .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "always", ",", "as", "bernie", "has", "shown", "us", ".", "so", "...", "what", "party", "does", "bernie", "vote", "for", "?", "does", "money", "corrupt", "politicians", "?", "yes", "or", "no", "?", "this", "is", "correct", ".", "it", "'s", "both", "." ]
The mentions of social groups in the text are: 1. "Bernie" - likely referring to Bernie Sanders, who is a political figure and a member of the Democratic Party in the United States. 2. "politicians" - a social group made up of individuals who hold political office and make decisions on behalf of their constituents. The text also raises questions and makes statements about the relationship between money and politicians, suggesting that it can have a corrupting influence. However, it does not explicitly name any other social groups.
The mentions of social groups in the text are: 1. "Bernie" - likely referring to Bernie Sanders, who is a political figure and a member of the Democratic Party in the United States. 2. "politicians" - a social group made up of individuals who hold political office and make decisions on behalf of their constituents. The text also raises questions and makes statements about the relationship between money and politicians, suggesting that it can have a corrupting influence. However, it does not explicitly name any other social groups.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "\"Bernie\"", "-", "likely", "referring", "to", "Bernie", "Sanders,", "who", "is", "a", "political", "figure", "and", "a", "member", "of", "the", "Democratic", "Party", "in", "the", "United", "States.", "2.", "\"politicians\"", "-", "a", "social", "group", "made", "up", "of", "individuals", "who", "hold", "political", "office", "and", "make", "decisions", "on", "behalf", "of", "their", "constituents.", "The", "text", "also", "raises", "questions", "and", "makes", "statements", "about", "the", "relationship", "between", "money", "and", "politicians,", "suggesting", "that", "it", "can", "have", "a", "corrupting", "influence.", "However,", "it", "does", "not", "explicitly", "name", "any", "other", "social", "groups." ]
88
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .
daphtln
politics
2,016
where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .
where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .
where you conveniently ignore facts and try to convince yourself of shit that 's not true . you must be new here .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "where", "you", "conveniently", "ignore", "facts", "and", "try", "to", "convince", "yourself", "of", "shit", "that", "'s", "not", "true", ".", "you", "must", "be", "new", "here", "." ]
I apologize if my previous response did not address your question fully. It sounds like you are asking about examples of social groups where individuals might ignore facts and convince themselves of things that are not true. Here are a few examples: 1. Political groups: These groups often have a set of beliefs and values that members are expected to adhere to. Facts that contradict these beliefs may be ignored or dismissed in order to maintain group cohesion. 2. Religious groups: Similar to political groups, religious groups often have a set of beliefs that members are expected to follow. Facts that contradict these beliefs may be dismissed or reinterpreted in a way that is consistent with the group's beliefs. 3. Online communities: Social media platforms and online forums can be echo chambers where like-minded individuals reinforce each other's beliefs, sometimes to the point of ignoring contradictory evidence. 4. Conspiracy theorists: These groups often have a set of beliefs that are not supported by evidence or are directly contradicted by it. Members may ignore facts and rational arguments in order to maintain their belief in the conspiracy theory. 5. Cults: Cults are a specific type of group where the leader has absolute authority and members are expected to follow their leader's teachings without question. Facts that contradict the leader's teachings may be dismissed or punished. It is important to note that not all members of these groups ignore facts and believe things that are not true. However, these groups can be more susceptible to this behavior due to their group dynamics and social norms.
I apologize if my previous response did not address your question fully. It sounds like you are asking about examples of social groups where individuals might ignore facts and convince themselves of things that are not true. Here are a few examples: 1. Political groups: These groups often have a set of beliefs and values that members are expected to adhere to. Facts that contradict these beliefs may be ignored or dismissed in order to maintain group cohesion. 2. Religious groups: Similar to political groups, religious groups often have a set of beliefs that members are expected to follow. Facts that contradict these beliefs may be dismissed or reinterpreted in a way that is consistent with the group's beliefs. 3. Online communities: Social media platforms and online forums can be echo chambers where like-minded individuals reinforce each other's beliefs, sometimes to the point of ignoring contradictory evidence. 4. Conspiracy theorists: These groups often have a set of beliefs that are not supported by evidence or are directly contradicted by it. Members may ignore facts and rational arguments in order to maintain their belief in the conspiracy theory. 5. Cults: Cults are a specific type of group where the leader has absolute authority and members are expected to follow their leader's teachings without question. Facts that contradict the leader's teachings may be dismissed or punished. It is important to note that not all members of these groups ignore facts and believe things that are not true. However, these groups can be more susceptible to this behavior due to their group dynamics and social norms.
[ "I", "apologize", "if", "my", "previous", "response", "did", "not", "address", "your", "question", "fully.", "It", "sounds", "like", "you", "are", "asking", "about", "examples", "of", "social", "groups", "where", "individuals", "might", "ignore", "facts", "and", "convince", "themselves", "of", "things", "that", "are", "not", "true.", "Here", "are", "a", "few", "examples:", "1.", "Political", "groups:", "These", "groups", "often", "have", "a", "set", "of", "beliefs", "and", "values", "that", "members", "are", "expected", "to", "adhere", "to.", "Facts", "that", "contradict", "these", "beliefs", "may", "be", "ignored", "or", "dismissed", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "group", "cohesion.", "2.", "Religious", "groups:", "Similar", "to", "political", "groups,", "religious", "groups", "often", "have", "a", "set", "of", "beliefs", "that", "members", "are", "expected", "to", "follow.", "Facts", "that", "contradict", "these", "beliefs", "may", "be", "dismissed", "or", "reinterpreted", "in", "a", "way", "that", "is", "consistent", "with", "the", "group's", "beliefs.", "3.", "Online", "communities:", "Social", "media", "platforms", "and", "online", "forums", "can", "be", "echo", "chambers", "where", "like-minded", "individuals", "reinforce", "each", "other's", "beliefs,", "sometimes", "to", "the", "point", "of", "ignoring", "contradictory", "evidence.", "4.", "Conspiracy", "theorists:", "These", "groups", "often", "have", "a", "set", "of", "beliefs", "that", "are", "not", "supported", "by", "evidence", "or", "are", "directly", "contradicted", "by", "it.", "Members", "may", "ignore", "facts", "and", "rational", "arguments", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "their", "belief", "in", "the", "conspiracy", "theory.", "5.", "Cults:", "Cults", "are", "a", "specific", "type", "of", "group", "where", "the", "leader", "has", "absolute", "authority", "and", "members", "are", "expected", "to", "follow", "their", "leader's", "teachings", "without", "question.", "Facts", "that", "contradict", "the", "leader's", "teachings", "may", "be", "dismissed", "or", "punished.", "It", "is", "important", "to", "note", "that", "not", "all", "members", "of", "these", "groups", "ignore", "facts", "and", "believe", "things", "that", "are", "not", "true.", "However,", "these", "groups", "can", "be", "more", "susceptible", "to", "this", "behavior", "due", "to", "their", "group", "dynamics", "and", "social", "norms." ]
263
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''
d43we61
politics
2,016
ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''
ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''
ah yes , the long con . everything happens for a reason in politics . these people invest way to much time , effort , money for anything to happen at random . first thing i thought when obama met with sanders then endorsed clinton sanders just got something out of this , but what ? ''
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "ah", "yes", ",", "the", "long", "con", ".", "everything", "happens", "for", "a", "reason", "in", "politics", ".", "these", "people", "invest", "way", "to", "much", "time", ",", "effort", ",", "money", "for", "anything", "to", "happen", "at", "random", ".", "first", "thing", "i", "thought", "when", "obama", "met", "with", "sanders", "then", "endorsed", "clinton", "sanders", "just", "got", "something", "out", "of", "this", ",", "but", "what", "?", "``" ]
The mentions of social groups in the text are "politics," "these people" (referring to those involved in the long con of politics), "Obama," "Sanders," and "Clinton." The text suggests that there is often a strategic calculus behind political decisions, and that individuals and groups within politics (such as Obama, Sanders, and Clinton) are often acting with intent and purpose. The mention of "these people" also implies a larger social group of political actors who are involved in the long con.
The mentions of social groups in the text are "politics," "these people" (referring to those involved in the long con of politics), "Obama," "Sanders," and "Clinton." The text suggests that there is often a strategic calculus behind political decisions, and that individuals and groups within politics (such as Obama, Sanders, and Clinton) are often acting with intent and purpose. The mention of "these people" also implies a larger social group of political actors who are involved in the long con.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "text", "are", "\"politics,\"", "\"these", "people\"", "(referring", "to", "those", "involved", "in", "the", "long", "con", "of", "politics),", "\"Obama,\"", "\"Sanders,\"", "and", "\"Clinton.\"", "The", "text", "suggests", "that", "there", "is", "often", "a", "strategic", "calculus", "behind", "political", "decisions,", "and", "that", "individuals", "and", "groups", "within", "politics", "(such", "as", "Obama,", "Sanders,", "and", "Clinton)", "are", "often", "acting", "with", "intent", "and", "purpose.", "The", "mention", "of", "\"these", "people\"", "also", "implies", "a", "larger", "social", "group", "of", "political", "actors", "who", "are", "involved", "in", "the", "long", "con." ]
80
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .
d1lgtrj
politics
2,016
how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .
how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .
how has clinton taken 4.5m in fossil fuel money ? please provide sources because that claim is bullshit . the amount of money clinton has spent has been almost all through her campaign , a.k.a . individual donations . clinton 's super pacs are all saving for the general now that the primary race is over .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "how", "has", "clinton", "taken", "4.5m", "in", "fossil", "fuel", "money", "?", "please", "provide", "sources", "because", "that", "claim", "is", "bullshit", ".", "the", "amount", "of", "money", "clinton", "has", "spent", "has", "been", "almost", "all", "through", "her", "campaign", ",", "a.k.a", ".", "individual", "donations", ".", "clinton", "'s", "super", "pacs", "are", "all", "saving", "for", "the", "general", "now", "that", "the", "primary", "race", "is", "over", "." ]
I apologize for any confusion regarding the mention of social groups. As for the claim about Hillary Clinton taking $4.5 million in fossil fuel money, I will provide some context and sources. Firstly, it's important to clarify that Clinton did not receive direct contributions from fossil fuel companies to her campaign or her Super PACs. However, according to data compiled by Greenpeace, employees of the fossil fuel industry donated about $4.5 million to Clinton's campaign and Super PACs during the 2016 election cycle (source: <https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/demand-clean-energy/fossil-free-politics/fossil-fuel-money-in-politics/>). It's also important to note that political candidates and organizations cannot control or restrict who chooses to donate to their campaigns, as long as the donations comply with campaign finance laws. Regarding the claim that Clinton's campaign has spent almost all of its funds on individual donations, that's not entirely accurate. According to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) data, as of May 2016, Clinton's campaign had received about $171 million in total contributions, of which about $48.6 million came from individual contributions, and the rest came from various sources, including transfers from other committees, joint fundraising committees, and other PACs (source: <https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=processed&cycle=2016&committee_id=C00573991&total_level=candidate&min_date=01/01/2015&max_date=12/31/2016>). Additionally, as of May 2016, Clinton's Super PACs had received a total of about $55.7 million in contributions, almost all of which came from individual donors, with only about $495,000 coming from PACs (source: <https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=processed&cycle=2016&committee_id=C00512053
I apologize for any confusion regarding the mention of social groups. As for the claim about Hillary Clinton taking $4.5 million in fossil fuel money, I will provide some context and sources. Firstly, it's important to clarify that Clinton did not receive direct contributions from fossil fuel companies to her campaign or her Super PACs. However, according to data compiled by Greenpeace, employees of the fossil fuel industry donated about $4.5 million to Clinton's campaign and Super PACs during the 2016 election cycle (source: <https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/demand-clean-energy/fossil-free-politics/fossil-fuel-money-in-politics/>). It's also important to note that political candidates and organizations cannot control or restrict who chooses to donate to their campaigns, as long as the donations comply with campaign finance laws. Regarding the claim that Clinton's campaign has spent almost all of its funds on individual donations, that's not entirely accurate. According to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) data, as of May 2016, Clinton's campaign had received about $171 million in total contributions, of which about $48.6 million came from individual contributions, and the rest came from various sources, including transfers from other committees, joint fundraising committees, and other PACs (source: <https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=processed&cycle=2016&committee_id=C00573991&total_level=candidate&min_date=01/01/2015&max_date=12/31/2016>). Additionally, as of May 2016, Clinton's Super PACs had received a total of about $55.7 million in contributions, almost all of which came from individual donors, with only about $495,000 coming from PACs (source: <https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=processed&cycle=2016&committee_id=C00512053
[ "I", "apologize", "for", "any", "confusion", "regarding", "the", "mention", "of", "social", "groups.", "As", "for", "the", "claim", "about", "Hillary", "Clinton", "taking", "$4.5", "million", "in", "fossil", "fuel", "money,", "I", "will", "provide", "some", "context", "and", "sources.", "Firstly,", "it's", "important", "to", "clarify", "that", "Clinton", "did", "not", "receive", "direct", "contributions", "from", "fossil", "fuel", "companies", "to", "her", "campaign", "or", "her", "Super", "PACs.", "However,", "according", "to", "data", "compiled", "by", "Greenpeace,", "employees", "of", "the", "fossil", "fuel", "industry", "donated", "about", "$4.5", "million", "to", "Clinton's", "campaign", "and", "Super", "PACs", "during", "the", "2016", "election", "cycle", "(source:", "<https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/demand-clean-energy/fossil-free-politics/fossil-fuel-money-in-politics/>).", "It's", "also", "important", "to", "note", "that", "political", "candidates", "and", "organizations", "cannot", "control", "or", "restrict", "who", "chooses", "to", "donate", "to", "their", "campaigns,", "as", "long", "as", "the", "donations", "comply", "with", "campaign", "finance", "laws.", "Regarding", "the", "claim", "that", "Clinton's", "campaign", "has", "spent", "almost", "all", "of", "its", "funds", "on", "individual", "donations,", "that's", "not", "entirely", "accurate.", "According", "to", "the", "Federal", "Election", "Commission", "(FEC)", "data,", "as", "of", "May", "2016,", "Clinton's", "campaign", "had", "received", "about", "$171", "million", "in", "total", "contributions,", "of", "which", "about", "$48.6", "million", "came", "from", "individual", "contributions,", "and", "the", "rest", "came", "from", "various", "sources,", "including", "transfers", "from", "other", "committees,", "joint", "fundraising", "committees,", "and", "other", "PACs", "(source:", "<https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=processed&cycle=2016&committee_id=C00573991&total_level=candidate&min_date=01/01/2015&max_date=12/31/2016>).", "Additionally,", "as", "of", "May", "2016,", "Clinton's", "Super", "PACs", "had", "received", "a", "total", "of", "about", "$55.7", "million", "in", "contributions,", "almost", "all", "of", "which", "came", "from", "individual", "donors,", "with", "only", "about", "$495,000", "coming", "from", "PACs", "(source:", "<https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=processed&cycle=2016&committee_id=C00512053" ]
222
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the republicans agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .
d985emt
politics
2,016
he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .
he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .
he also constantly talks about 'reaching across the aisle ' despite the evidence that this would get him nowhere . yes , obama talks . what does he do ? did he start using republican talking points and pass half their agenda for nothing in return ? no . that 's what bill did . obama talked about compromise but only if the @@republicans## agreed to support major progressive accomplishments . they said no and obama held the line by not passing their agenda like bill did . the difference between the two is significant .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "he", "also", "constantly", "talks", "about", "'reaching", "across", "the", "aisle", "'", "despite", "the", "evidence", "that", "this", "would", "get", "him", "nowhere", ".", "yes", ",", "obama", "talks", ".", "what", "does", "he", "do", "?", "did", "he", "start", "using", "republican", "talking", "points", "and", "pass", "half", "their", "agenda", "for", "nothing", "in", "return", "?", "no", ".", "that", "'s", "what", "bill", "did", ".", "obama", "talked", "about", "compromise", "but", "only", "if", "the", "republicans", "agreed", "to", "support", "major", "progressive", "accomplishments", ".", "they", "said", "no", "and", "obama", "held", "the", "line", "by", "not", "passing", "their", "agenda", "like", "bill", "did", ".", "the", "difference", "between", "the", "two", "is", "significant", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in this text are: 1. The group that the pronoun "he" refers to, which is likely a politician or political figure who is being criticized for their approach to bipartisanship. 2. The "aisle" that the politician is encouraged to "reach across," which represents the divide between political parties in a legislative body. 3. The groups represented by the terms "Republican" and "progressive," which are political ideologies or factions within the larger political landscape. The text highlights the difference between two political approaches: one that involves capitulating to the demands of the opposing party (presumably the Republican party), and another that involves holding firm to one's own principles (in this case, progressive ones). The text suggests that the former approach is ineffective, while the latter approach is more successful.
The social groups mentioned in this text are: 1. The group that the pronoun "he" refers to, which is likely a politician or political figure who is being criticized for their approach to bipartisanship. 2. The "aisle" that the politician is encouraged to "reach across," which represents the divide between political parties in a legislative body. 3. The groups represented by the terms "Republican" and "progressive," which are political ideologies or factions within the larger political landscape. The text highlights the difference between two political approaches: one that involves capitulating to the demands of the opposing party (presumably the Republican party), and another that involves holding firm to one's own principles (in this case, progressive ones). The text suggests that the former approach is ineffective, while the latter approach is more successful.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "text", "are:", "1.", "The", "group", "that", "the", "pronoun", "\"he\"", "refers", "to,", "which", "is", "likely", "a", "politician", "or", "political", "figure", "who", "is", "being", "criticized", "for", "their", "approach", "to", "bipartisanship.", "2.", "The", "\"aisle\"", "that", "the", "politician", "is", "encouraged", "to", "\"reach", "across,\"", "which", "represents", "the", "divide", "between", "political", "parties", "in", "a", "legislative", "body.", "3.", "The", "groups", "represented", "by", "the", "terms", "\"Republican\"", "and", "\"progressive,\"", "which", "are", "political", "ideologies", "or", "factions", "within", "the", "larger", "political", "landscape.", "The", "text", "highlights", "the", "difference", "between", "two", "political", "approaches:", "one", "that", "involves", "capitulating", "to", "the", "demands", "of", "the", "opposing", "party", "(presumably", "the", "Republican", "party),", "and", "another", "that", "involves", "holding", "firm", "to", "one's", "own", "principles", "(in", "this", "case,", "progressive", "ones).", "The", "text", "suggests", "that", "the", "former", "approach", "is", "ineffective,", "while", "the", "latter", "approach", "is", "more", "successful." ]
132
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .
d7p6m6v
politics
2,016
or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .
or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .
or asking why we are n't using nuclear weapons .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "or", "asking", "why", "we", "are", "n't", "using", "nuclear", "weapons", "." ]
I'm assuming you are referring to the mentions of social groups and the hypothetical question about nuclear weapons in the following passage: "In the past, warfare was often seen as a rite of passage, a way for young men to prove their courage and strength. But in today's world, where we have nuclear weapons capable of causing widespread devastation, is this mentality still relevant? Do we really want to encourage our sons and daughters to participate in something that could lead to the end of civilization as we know it? Instead, we should be teaching our children the importance of empathy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. We should be emphasizing the value of diversity and inclusivity, and showing them how to appreciate the differences between people from different social groups. We should be encouraging them to use their voices to speak out against injustice and to work towards building a more equitable and peaceful world." In this passage, the social groups that are mentioned are: * Young men: The passage mentions that warfare was often seen as a rite of passage for young men in the past. * Sons and daughters: The passage emphasizes that we should not encourage our sons and daughters to participate in something that could lead to the end of civilization as we know it. * People from different social groups: The passage highlights the importance of diversity and inclusivity, and the value of appreciating the differences between people from different social groups. As for the hypothetical question about nuclear weapons, the passage raises the issue of their destructive capability and suggests that encouraging our children to participate in something that could lead to the end of civilization as we know it is not advisable. However, the passage does not explicitly ask why we are not using nuclear weapons.
I'm assuming you are referring to the mentions of social groups and the hypothetical question about nuclear weapons in the following passage: "In the past, warfare was often seen as a rite of passage, a way for young men to prove their courage and strength. But in today's world, where we have nuclear weapons capable of causing widespread devastation, is this mentality still relevant? Do we really want to encourage our sons and daughters to participate in something that could lead to the end of civilization as we know it? Instead, we should be teaching our children the importance of empathy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. We should be emphasizing the value of diversity and inclusivity, and showing them how to appreciate the differences between people from different social groups. We should be encouraging them to use their voices to speak out against injustice and to work towards building a more equitable and peaceful world." In this passage, the social groups that are mentioned are: * Young men: The passage mentions that warfare was often seen as a rite of passage for young men in the past. * Sons and daughters: The passage emphasizes that we should not encourage our sons and daughters to participate in something that could lead to the end of civilization as we know it. * People from different social groups: The passage highlights the importance of diversity and inclusivity, and the value of appreciating the differences between people from different social groups. As for the hypothetical question about nuclear weapons, the passage raises the issue of their destructive capability and suggests that encouraging our children to participate in something that could lead to the end of civilization as we know it is not advisable. However, the passage does not explicitly ask why we are not using nuclear weapons.
[ "I'm", "assuming", "you", "are", "referring", "to", "the", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "and", "the", "hypothetical", "question", "about", "nuclear", "weapons", "in", "the", "following", "passage:", "\"In", "the", "past,", "warfare", "was", "often", "seen", "as", "a", "rite", "of", "passage,", "a", "way", "for", "young", "men", "to", "prove", "their", "courage", "and", "strength.", "But", "in", "today's", "world,", "where", "we", "have", "nuclear", "weapons", "capable", "of", "causing", "widespread", "devastation,", "is", "this", "mentality", "still", "relevant?", "Do", "we", "really", "want", "to", "encourage", "our", "sons", "and", "daughters", "to", "participate", "in", "something", "that", "could", "lead", "to", "the", "end", "of", "civilization", "as", "we", "know", "it?", "Instead,", "we", "should", "be", "teaching", "our", "children", "the", "importance", "of", "empathy,", "cooperation,", "and", "conflict", "resolution.", "We", "should", "be", "emphasizing", "the", "value", "of", "diversity", "and", "inclusivity,", "and", "showing", "them", "how", "to", "appreciate", "the", "differences", "between", "people", "from", "different", "social", "groups.", "We", "should", "be", "encouraging", "them", "to", "use", "their", "voices", "to", "speak", "out", "against", "injustice", "and", "to", "work", "towards", "building", "a", "more", "equitable", "and", "peaceful", "world.\"", "In", "this", "passage,", "the", "social", "groups", "that", "are", "mentioned", "are:", "*", "Young", "men:", "The", "passage", "mentions", "that", "warfare", "was", "often", "seen", "as", "a", "rite", "of", "passage", "for", "young", "men", "in", "the", "past.", "*", "Sons", "and", "daughters:", "The", "passage", "emphasizes", "that", "we", "should", "not", "encourage", "our", "sons", "and", "daughters", "to", "participate", "in", "something", "that", "could", "lead", "to", "the", "end", "of", "civilization", "as", "we", "know", "it.", "*", "People", "from", "different", "social", "groups:", "The", "passage", "highlights", "the", "importance", "of", "diversity", "and", "inclusivity,", "and", "the", "value", "of", "appreciating", "the", "differences", "between", "people", "from", "different", "social", "groups.", "As", "for", "the", "hypothetical", "question", "about", "nuclear", "weapons,", "the", "passage", "raises", "the", "issue", "of", "their", "destructive", "capability", "and", "suggests", "that", "encouraging", "our", "children", "to", "participate", "in", "something", "that", "could", "lead", "to", "the", "end", "of", "civilization", "as", "we", "know", "it", "is", "not", "advisable.", "However,", "the", "passage", "does", "not", "explicitly", "ask", "why", "we", "are", "not", "using", "nuclear", "weapons." ]
302
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .
d3gnijv
politics
2,016
jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .
jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .
jesus dude you just got called out , proven you were wrong , and you decide that instead of just admitting you 're wrong , you bring out a bunch of strawmen and act like an ass . just stop , this is painful .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "jesus", "dude", "you", "just", "got", "called", "out", ",", "proven", "you", "were", "wrong", ",", "and", "you", "decide", "that", "instead", "of", "just", "admitting", "you", "'re", "wrong", ",", "you", "bring", "out", "a", "bunch", "of", "strawmen", "and", "act", "like", "an", "ass", ".", "just", "stop", ",", "this", "is", "painful", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in this passage are "Jesus dude" and an unnamed group consisting of those who called out the individual referred to as "Jesus dude" and proven them wrong. These groups are implied through the use of labeling and name-calling, and the passage suggests a conflict or disagreement between them. The individual referred to as "Jesus dude" is portrayed as being defensive and resistant to admitting wrongdoing, while the other group is depicted as having called out and proven them wrong. The passage may also imply a larger social context in which this interaction is taking place, such as a debate or discussion in which different perspectives and beliefs are being expressed and evaluated.
The social groups mentioned in this passage are "Jesus dude" and an unnamed group consisting of those who called out the individual referred to as "Jesus dude" and proven them wrong. These groups are implied through the use of labeling and name-calling, and the passage suggests a conflict or disagreement between them. The individual referred to as "Jesus dude" is portrayed as being defensive and resistant to admitting wrongdoing, while the other group is depicted as having called out and proven them wrong. The passage may also imply a larger social context in which this interaction is taking place, such as a debate or discussion in which different perspectives and beliefs are being expressed and evaluated.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "passage", "are", "\"Jesus", "dude\"", "and", "an", "unnamed", "group", "consisting", "of", "those", "who", "called", "out", "the", "individual", "referred", "to", "as", "\"Jesus", "dude\"", "and", "proven", "them", "wrong.", "These", "groups", "are", "implied", "through", "the", "use", "of", "labeling", "and", "name-calling,", "and", "the", "passage", "suggests", "a", "conflict", "or", "disagreement", "between", "them.", "The", "individual", "referred", "to", "as", "\"Jesus", "dude\"", "is", "portrayed", "as", "being", "defensive", "and", "resistant", "to", "admitting", "wrongdoing,", "while", "the", "other", "group", "is", "depicted", "as", "having", "called", "out", "and", "proven", "them", "wrong.", "The", "passage", "may", "also", "imply", "a", "larger", "social", "context", "in", "which", "this", "interaction", "is", "taking", "place,", "such", "as", "a", "debate", "or", "discussion", "in", "which", "different", "perspectives", "and", "beliefs", "are", "being", "expressed", "and", "evaluated." ]
116
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other presidents responded maturely , why not trump ?
darqmhg
politics
2,016
they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?
they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?
they 've made fun of every other president for the past four decades , why not trump ? for that matter , all the other @@presidents## responded maturely , why not trump ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "they", "'ve", "made", "fun", "of", "every", "other", "president", "for", "the", "past", "four", "decades", ",", "why", "not", "trump", "?", "for", "that", "matter", ",", "all", "the", "other", "presidents", "responded", "maturely", ",", "why", "not", "trump", "?" ]
The social groups mentioned in this statement are: 1. Those who have made fun of presidents for the past four decades. 2. The group of past presidents who responded maturely to being made fun of. 3. The specific President referred to as "Trump" who did not respond maturely, in contrast to the previous group. The statement implies a criticism of the third group for not meeting the standard of maturity set by the second group.
The social groups mentioned in this statement are: 1. Those who have made fun of presidents for the past four decades. 2. The group of past presidents who responded maturely to being made fun of. 3. The specific President referred to as "Trump" who did not respond maturely, in contrast to the previous group. The statement implies a criticism of the third group for not meeting the standard of maturity set by the second group.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "statement", "are:", "1.", "Those", "who", "have", "made", "fun", "of", "presidents", "for", "the", "past", "four", "decades.", "2.", "The", "group", "of", "past", "presidents", "who", "responded", "maturely", "to", "being", "made", "fun", "of.", "3.", "The", "specific", "President", "referred", "to", "as", "\"Trump\"", "who", "did", "not", "respond", "maturely,", "in", "contrast", "to", "the", "previous", "group.", "The", "statement", "implies", "a", "criticism", "of", "the", "third", "group", "for", "not", "meeting", "the", "standard", "of", "maturity", "set", "by", "the", "second", "group." ]
75
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some police officers improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .
d53ubir
politics
2,016
cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .
cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .
cost of the war on drugs agreed . maybe it 's time we take a step back and review some department policies . training some @@police officers## improperly . that 's pretty hard to say . if i got a 911 call from somebody saying a guy on main street was pointing a gun at people i would have a lot itchier trigger finger . thankfully i 'm not a police officer and do n't have to be presented with situations like that where i feel my life could be in danger . i 'm sure trump and clinton will fix the hateful rhetoric that there is . black humor at it 's finest .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "cost", "of", "the", "war", "on", "drugs", "agreed", ".", "maybe", "it", "'s", "time", "we", "take", "a", "step", "back", "and", "review", "some", "department", "policies", ".", "training", "some", "police", "officers", "improperly", ".", "that", "'s", "pretty", "hard", "to", "say", ".", "if", "i", "got", "a", "911", "call", "from", "somebody", "saying", "a", "guy", "on", "main", "street", "was", "pointing", "a", "gun", "at", "people", "i", "would", "have", "a", "lot", "itchier", "trigger", "finger", ".", "thankfully", "i", "'m", "not", "a", "police", "officer", "and", "do", "n't", "have", "to", "be", "presented", "with", "situations", "like", "that", "where", "i", "feel", "my", "life", "could", "be", "in", "danger", ".", "i", "'m", "sure", "trump", "and", "clinton", "will", "fix", "the", "hateful", "rhetoric", "that", "there", "is", ".", "black", "humor", "at", "it", "'s", "finest", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Those who agree with the cost of the war on drugs. 2. Police officers, specifically those who may have been improperly trained. 3. The department that trains police officers. 4. The hypothetical 911 callers and the armed "guy on main street." 5. The author, who distinguishes themselves from being a police officer. 6. Political figures Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, in the context of addressing hateful rhetoric. 7. The group that finds the use of "black humor" appropriate in this context.
The social groups mentioned in the text are: 1. Those who agree with the cost of the war on drugs. 2. Police officers, specifically those who may have been improperly trained. 3. The department that trains police officers. 4. The hypothetical 911 callers and the armed "guy on main street." 5. The author, who distinguishes themselves from being a police officer. 6. Political figures Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, in the context of addressing hateful rhetoric. 7. The group that finds the use of "black humor" appropriate in this context.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "are:", "1.", "Those", "who", "agree", "with", "the", "cost", "of", "the", "war", "on", "drugs.", "2.", "Police", "officers,", "specifically", "those", "who", "may", "have", "been", "improperly", "trained.", "3.", "The", "department", "that", "trains", "police", "officers.", "4.", "The", "hypothetical", "911", "callers", "and", "the", "armed", "\"guy", "on", "main", "street.\"", "5.", "The", "author,", "who", "distinguishes", "themselves", "from", "being", "a", "police", "officer.", "6.", "Political", "figures", "Donald", "Trump", "and", "Hillary", "Clinton,", "in", "the", "context", "of", "addressing", "hateful", "rhetoric.", "7.", "The", "group", "that", "finds", "the", "use", "of", "\"black", "humor\"", "appropriate", "in", "this", "context." ]
90
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .
d2rgnpn
politics
2,016
because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .
because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .
because ted cruz is far fucking worse than trump .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "ted", "cruz", "is", "far", "fucking", "worse", "than", "trump", "." ]
The mention of a social group in the statement "because Ted Cruz is far fucking worse than Trump" is "Ted Cruz." The statement appears to be a comparison between two political figures, implying that Ted Cruz is viewed as belonging to a particular social group (i.e., politicians or Republicans) and is considered to be inferior to another member of that group (Donald Trump) in some way. However, it's important to note that this statement is a subjective opinion, and not everyone may agree with this assessment of Ted Cruz or his comparison to Donald Trump.
The mention of a social group in the statement "because Ted Cruz is far fucking worse than Trump" is "Ted Cruz." The statement appears to be a comparison between two political figures, implying that Ted Cruz is viewed as belonging to a particular social group (i.e., politicians or Republicans) and is considered to be inferior to another member of that group (Donald Trump) in some way. However, it's important to note that this statement is a subjective opinion, and not everyone may agree with this assessment of Ted Cruz or his comparison to Donald Trump.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "a", "social", "group", "in", "the", "statement", "\"because", "Ted", "Cruz", "is", "far", "fucking", "worse", "than", "Trump\"", "is", "\"Ted", "Cruz.\"", "The", "statement", "appears", "to", "be", "a", "comparison", "between", "two", "political", "figures,", "implying", "that", "Ted", "Cruz", "is", "viewed", "as", "belonging", "to", "a", "particular", "social", "group", "(i.e.,", "politicians", "or", "Republicans)", "and", "is", "considered", "to", "be", "inferior", "to", "another", "member", "of", "that", "group", "(Donald", "Trump)", "in", "some", "way.", "However,", "it's", "important", "to", "note", "that", "this", "statement", "is", "a", "subjective", "opinion,", "and", "not", "everyone", "may", "agree", "with", "this", "assessment", "of", "Ted", "Cruz", "or", "his", "comparison", "to", "Donald", "Trump." ]
95
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .
d9q9v27
politics
2,016
my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .
my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .
my principle is this i 'm a progressive , i supported bernie sanders , and i 'd rather have someone who is a liberal as president then someone who is actively regressive . to me , voting for hillary is the most principled thing you can do .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "my", "principle", "is", "this", "i", "'m", "a", "progressive", ",", "i", "supported", "bernie", "sanders", ",", "and", "i", "'d", "rather", "have", "someone", "who", "is", "a", "liberal", "as", "president", "then", "someone", "who", "is", "actively", "regressive", ".", "to", "me", ",", "voting", "for", "hillary", "is", "the", "most", "principled", "thing", "you", "can", "do", "." ]
In this statement, you have identified yourself as a "progressive" and have expressed support for Senator Bernie Sanders, who is also often identified as a progressive. Progressives generally advocate for social and political change that aims to create more equality and opportunity for historically marginalized or disadvantaged groups. You have also mentioned that you would prefer to have a "liberal" as president, rather than someone who is "actively regressive." Liberals are typically associated with the political left, and they generally support social and economic policies that promote individual rights, equality, and government intervention to address social issues. By contrast, someone who is "actively regressive" would likely support policies that restrict individual rights, promote inequality, and limit government intervention in social and economic matters. Finally, you have indicated that you believe voting for Hillary Clinton is the "most principled thing you can do." Clinton, who served as Secretary of State under President Barack Obama and ran unsuccessfully for president in 2016, is often identified as a moderate liberal or centrist. Overall, this statement highlights the mentions of several social groups, including progressives, liberals, and those who hold regressive views. It also suggests that the speaker values principles of equality, individual rights, and government intervention to address social issues.
In this statement, you have identified yourself as a "progressive" and have expressed support for Senator Bernie Sanders, who is also often identified as a progressive. Progressives generally advocate for social and political change that aims to create more equality and opportunity for historically marginalized or disadvantaged groups. You have also mentioned that you would prefer to have a "liberal" as president, rather than someone who is "actively regressive." Liberals are typically associated with the political left, and they generally support social and economic policies that promote individual rights, equality, and government intervention to address social issues. By contrast, someone who is "actively regressive" would likely support policies that restrict individual rights, promote inequality, and limit government intervention in social and economic matters. Finally, you have indicated that you believe voting for Hillary Clinton is the "most principled thing you can do." Clinton, who served as Secretary of State under President Barack Obama and ran unsuccessfully for president in 2016, is often identified as a moderate liberal or centrist. Overall, this statement highlights the mentions of several social groups, including progressives, liberals, and those who hold regressive views. It also suggests that the speaker values principles of equality, individual rights, and government intervention to address social issues.
[ "In", "this", "statement,", "you", "have", "identified", "yourself", "as", "a", "\"progressive\"", "and", "have", "expressed", "support", "for", "Senator", "Bernie", "Sanders,", "who", "is", "also", "often", "identified", "as", "a", "progressive.", "Progressives", "generally", "advocate", "for", "social", "and", "political", "change", "that", "aims", "to", "create", "more", "equality", "and", "opportunity", "for", "historically", "marginalized", "or", "disadvantaged", "groups.", "You", "have", "also", "mentioned", "that", "you", "would", "prefer", "to", "have", "a", "\"liberal\"", "as", "president,", "rather", "than", "someone", "who", "is", "\"actively", "regressive.\"", "Liberals", "are", "typically", "associated", "with", "the", "political", "left,", "and", "they", "generally", "support", "social", "and", "economic", "policies", "that", "promote", "individual", "rights,", "equality,", "and", "government", "intervention", "to", "address", "social", "issues.", "By", "contrast,", "someone", "who", "is", "\"actively", "regressive\"", "would", "likely", "support", "policies", "that", "restrict", "individual", "rights,", "promote", "inequality,", "and", "limit", "government", "intervention", "in", "social", "and", "economic", "matters.", "Finally,", "you", "have", "indicated", "that", "you", "believe", "voting", "for", "Hillary", "Clinton", "is", "the", "\"most", "principled", "thing", "you", "can", "do.\"", "Clinton,", "who", "served", "as", "Secretary", "of", "State", "under", "President", "Barack", "Obama", "and", "ran", "unsuccessfully", "for", "president", "in", "2016,", "is", "often", "identified", "as", "a", "moderate", "liberal", "or", "centrist.", "Overall,", "this", "statement", "highlights", "the", "mentions", "of", "several", "social", "groups,", "including", "progressives,", "liberals,", "and", "those", "who", "hold", "regressive", "views.", "It", "also", "suggests", "that", "the", "speaker", "values", "principles", "of", "equality,", "individual", "rights,", "and", "government", "intervention", "to", "address", "social", "issues." ]
207
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
d0w216y
politics
2,016
hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
hi jpurdy . thank you for participating in SUBREDDIT . however , your submission has been removed for the following reason already submitted an earlier duplicate of this post received some upvotes URL i 'm a bot and sometimes i make mistakes . if you have any questions about this removal , please feel free to message the moderators . URL regarding the removal of this submission by USER messagei have a question regarding the removal of this submission . URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hi", "jpurdy", ".", "thank", "you", "for", "participating", "in", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "however", ",", "your", "submission", "has", "been", "removed", "for", "the", "following", "reason", "already", "submitted", "an", "earlier", "duplicate", "of", "this", "post", "received", "some", "upvotes", "URL", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "and", "sometimes", "i", "make", "mistakes", ".", "if", "you", "have", "any", "questions", "about", "this", "removal", ",", "please", "feel", "free", "to", "message", "the", "moderators", ".", "URL", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", "by", "USER", "messagei", "have", "a", "question", "regarding", "the", "removal", "of", "this", "submission", ".", "URL" ]
The mentions of social groups in this text are: * "hi jpurdy" - this appears to be a user mentioning themselves. * "SUBREDDIT" - this refers to a community on the social media platform Reddit. * "moderators" - these are individuals who have been given special permissions to manage and oversee a community on Reddit. There are no other explicit mentions of social groups in this text. However, the text does mention the concept of a "removal," which implies the existence of a group or community with rules and the authority to enforce them. It is also possible that the URLs mentioned in the text contain additional information about social groups or communities.
The mentions of social groups in this text are: * "hi jpurdy" - this appears to be a user mentioning themselves. * "SUBREDDIT" - this refers to a community on the social media platform Reddit. * "moderators" - these are individuals who have been given special permissions to manage and oversee a community on Reddit. There are no other explicit mentions of social groups in this text. However, the text does mention the concept of a "removal," which implies the existence of a group or community with rules and the authority to enforce them. It is also possible that the URLs mentioned in the text contain additional information about social groups or communities.
[ "The", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "this", "text", "are:", "*", "\"hi", "jpurdy\"", "-", "this", "appears", "to", "be", "a", "user", "mentioning", "themselves.", "*", "\"SUBREDDIT\"", "-", "this", "refers", "to", "a", "community", "on", "the", "social", "media", "platform", "Reddit.", "*", "\"moderators\"", "-", "these", "are", "individuals", "who", "have", "been", "given", "special", "permissions", "to", "manage", "and", "oversee", "a", "community", "on", "Reddit.", "There", "are", "no", "other", "explicit", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "this", "text.", "However,", "the", "text", "does", "mention", "the", "concept", "of", "a", "\"removal,\"", "which", "implies", "the", "existence", "of", "a", "group", "or", "community", "with", "rules", "and", "the", "authority", "to", "enforce", "them.", "It", "is", "also", "possible", "that", "the", "URLs", "mentioned", "in", "the", "text", "contain", "additional", "information", "about", "social", "groups", "or", "communities." ]
113
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
nope we will not elect kings in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !
d3n0lqn
politics
2,016
nope we will not elect @@kings## in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !
nope we will not elect kings in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !
nope we will not elect @@kings## in this country ! that 's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "nope", "we", "will", "not", "elect", "kings", "in", "this", "country", "!", "that", "'s", "why", "we", "have", "the", "divisions", "of", "power", "in", "the", "constitution", "!" ]
The mention of social groups in the statement "nope we will not elect kings in this country! That's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution!" is inherently implied rather than explicitly stated. The social group being referred to here is the governing body, or those who hold power in a country. The statement is expressing the democratic principle of separating and balancing power among different branches or divisions of government, rather than concentrating it in the hands of a single ruler or monarchy. This principle is often enshrined in a country's constitution, and serves to promote fairness, accountability, and the protection of individual rights.
The mention of social groups in the statement "nope we will not elect kings in this country! That's why we have the divisions of power in the constitution!" is inherently implied rather than explicitly stated. The social group being referred to here is the governing body, or those who hold power in a country. The statement is expressing the democratic principle of separating and balancing power among different branches or divisions of government, rather than concentrating it in the hands of a single ruler or monarchy. This principle is often enshrined in a country's constitution, and serves to promote fairness, accountability, and the protection of individual rights.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "statement", "\"nope", "we", "will", "not", "elect", "kings", "in", "this", "country!", "That's", "why", "we", "have", "the", "divisions", "of", "power", "in", "the", "constitution!\"", "is", "inherently", "implied", "rather", "than", "explicitly", "stated.", "The", "social", "group", "being", "referred", "to", "here", "is", "the", "governing", "body,", "or", "those", "who", "hold", "power", "in", "a", "country.", "The", "statement", "is", "expressing", "the", "democratic", "principle", "of", "separating", "and", "balancing", "power", "among", "different", "branches", "or", "divisions", "of", "government,", "rather", "than", "concentrating", "it", "in", "the", "hands", "of", "a", "single", "ruler", "or", "monarchy.", "This", "principle", "is", "often", "enshrined", "in", "a", "country's", "constitution,", "and", "serves", "to", "promote", "fairness,", "accountability,", "and", "the", "protection", "of", "individual", "rights." ]
107
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .
d5k6v1o
politics
2,016
sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .
sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .
sure . i would like to vote for josiah bartlet . i mean in the current reality .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "sure", ".", "i", "would", "like", "to", "vote", "for", "josiah", "bartlet", ".", "i", "mean", "in", "the", "current", "reality", "." ]
It seems like you are referring to the television show "The West Wing" and expressing your support for fictional presidential character Josiah Bartlet. In the context of the show, some social groups mentioned include: 1. The Democratic Party: Josiah Bartlet is a member of the Democratic Party and serves as their Presidential nominee and eventual President in the series. 2. The Federal Government: Various federal government departments and agencies are frequently mentioned, including the White House staff, the Cabinet, the Supreme Court, and Congress. 3. The American People: The show often addresses the concerns and perspectives of various demographic groups within the United States, including but not limited to, racial and ethnic minorities, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people with disabilities. 4. Lobbyists and Special Interest Groups: The show explores the influence of various lobbying groups on the political process and the challenges that politicians face in balancing the needs and interests of these groups. 5. The International Community: The show also touches on international relations and the role of the United States in global politics, with references to various countries, international organizations, and global issues. Note that the show is set in a fictionalized version of reality, and some of the social groups and political dynamics presented may not accurately reflect the current state of affairs.
It seems like you are referring to the television show "The West Wing" and expressing your support for fictional presidential character Josiah Bartlet. In the context of the show, some social groups mentioned include: 1. The Democratic Party: Josiah Bartlet is a member of the Democratic Party and serves as their Presidential nominee and eventual President in the series. 2. The Federal Government: Various federal government departments and agencies are frequently mentioned, including the White House staff, the Cabinet, the Supreme Court, and Congress. 3. The American People: The show often addresses the concerns and perspectives of various demographic groups within the United States, including but not limited to, racial and ethnic minorities, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people with disabilities. 4. Lobbyists and Special Interest Groups: The show explores the influence of various lobbying groups on the political process and the challenges that politicians face in balancing the needs and interests of these groups. 5. The International Community: The show also touches on international relations and the role of the United States in global politics, with references to various countries, international organizations, and global issues. Note that the show is set in a fictionalized version of reality, and some of the social groups and political dynamics presented may not accurately reflect the current state of affairs.
[ "It", "seems", "like", "you", "are", "referring", "to", "the", "television", "show", "\"The", "West", "Wing\"", "and", "expressing", "your", "support", "for", "fictional", "presidential", "character", "Josiah", "Bartlet.", "In", "the", "context", "of", "the", "show,", "some", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "include:", "1.", "The", "Democratic", "Party:", "Josiah", "Bartlet", "is", "a", "member", "of", "the", "Democratic", "Party", "and", "serves", "as", "their", "Presidential", "nominee", "and", "eventual", "President", "in", "the", "series.", "2.", "The", "Federal", "Government:", "Various", "federal", "government", "departments", "and", "agencies", "are", "frequently", "mentioned,", "including", "the", "White", "House", "staff,", "the", "Cabinet,", "the", "Supreme", "Court,", "and", "Congress.", "3.", "The", "American", "People:", "The", "show", "often", "addresses", "the", "concerns", "and", "perspectives", "of", "various", "demographic", "groups", "within", "the", "United", "States,", "including", "but", "not", "limited", "to,", "racial", "and", "ethnic", "minorities,", "women,", "LGBTQ+", "individuals,", "and", "people", "with", "disabilities.", "4.", "Lobbyists", "and", "Special", "Interest", "Groups:", "The", "show", "explores", "the", "influence", "of", "various", "lobbying", "groups", "on", "the", "political", "process", "and", "the", "challenges", "that", "politicians", "face", "in", "balancing", "the", "needs", "and", "interests", "of", "these", "groups.", "5.", "The", "International", "Community:", "The", "show", "also", "touches", "on", "international", "relations", "and", "the", "role", "of", "the", "United", "States", "in", "global", "politics,", "with", "references", "to", "various", "countries,", "international", "organizations,", "and", "global", "issues.", "Note", "that", "the", "show", "is", "set", "in", "a", "fictionalized", "version", "of", "reality,", "and", "some", "of", "the", "social", "groups", "and", "political", "dynamics", "presented", "may", "not", "accurately", "reflect", "the", "current", "state", "of", "affairs." ]
216
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in the senate . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the republicans , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .
d8j2uj2
politics
2,016
at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in @@the senate## . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit @@the right## has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the @@republicans## , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .
at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in the senate . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the republicans , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .
at first it was lesser of two evils for me . i voted for bernie , and i still love that man . however , after looking into facts on clinton , i do think she would make a good president in theory . listening , in my opinion , is the most important skill a leader can posses . from every account , hillary is an exceptional listener , she even did listening tours with her time in @@the senate## . most of the shit that drips off clinton is shit @@the right## has thrown at her since the '90s . unfortunately , i think that is what is going to lead to her having a rough presidency . similar to australia 's first female prime minister , iirc the media crucified her . i know a lot of us have this feeling that hillary will be able to work with the @@republicans## , but i see no reason for them to stop their obstructionism . it is well documented that they work well together in back rooms , and they paint her as satan in public . who knows , maybe trump snaps them back into reality .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "at", "first", "it", "was", "lesser", "of", "two", "evils", "for", "me", ".", "i", "voted", "for", "bernie", ",", "and", "i", "still", "love", "that", "man", ".", "however", ",", "after", "looking", "into", "facts", "on", "clinton", ",", "i", "do", "think", "she", "would", "make", "a", "good", "president", "in", "theory", ".", "listening", ",", "in", "my", "opinion", ",", "is", "the", "most", "important", "skill", "a", "leader", "can", "posses", ".", "from", "every", "account", ",", "hillary", "is", "an", "exceptional", "listener", ",", "she", "even", "did", "listening", "tours", "with", "her", "time", "in", "the", "senate", ".", "most", "of", "the", "shit", "that", "drips", "off", "clinton", "is", "shit", "the", "right", "has", "thrown", "at", "her", "since", "the", "'90s", ".", "unfortunately", ",", "i", "think", "that", "is", "what", "is", "going", "to", "lead", "to", "her", "having", "a", "rough", "presidency", ".", "similar", "to", "australia", "'s", "first", "female", "prime", "minister", ",", "iirc", "the", "media", "crucified", "her", ".", "i", "know", "a", "lot", "of", "us", "have", "this", "feeling", "that", "hillary", "will", "be", "able", "to", "work", "with", "the", "republicans", ",", "but", "i", "see", "no", "reason", "for", "them", "to", "stop", "their", "obstructionism", ".", "it", "is", "well", "documented", "that", "they", "work", "well", "together", "in", "back", "rooms", ",", "and", "they", "paint", "her", "as", "satan", "in", "public", ".", "who", "knows", ",", "maybe", "trump", "snaps", "them", "back", "into", "reality", "." ]
In this passage, the social groups mentioned include: 1. Supporters of Bernie Sanders: The author mentions that they voted for Bernie, indicating that they are a supporter of his campaign. 2. Supporters of Hillary Clinton: The author states that they believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president and that she is an exceptional listener. 3. The Right: The author mentions that "most of the shit that drips off Clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s," implying that they are a group with conservative political beliefs. 4. The Media: The author mentions that Australia's first female prime minister was crucified by the media, suggesting that they are a powerful social group with the ability to shape public opinion. 5. The Republican Party: The author mentions that Hillary Clinton will have to work with the Republicans, indicating that they are a social group with significant political power in the United States. 6. The Democratic Party: Although not explicitly mentioned, the author's support for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton suggests that they are a member or supporter of the Democratic Party.
In this passage, the social groups mentioned include: 1. Supporters of Bernie Sanders: The author mentions that they voted for Bernie, indicating that they are a supporter of his campaign. 2. Supporters of Hillary Clinton: The author states that they believe Hillary Clinton would make a good president and that she is an exceptional listener. 3. The Right: The author mentions that "most of the shit that drips off Clinton is shit the right has thrown at her since the '90s," implying that they are a group with conservative political beliefs. 4. The Media: The author mentions that Australia's first female prime minister was crucified by the media, suggesting that they are a powerful social group with the ability to shape public opinion. 5. The Republican Party: The author mentions that Hillary Clinton will have to work with the Republicans, indicating that they are a social group with significant political power in the United States. 6. The Democratic Party: Although not explicitly mentioned, the author's support for Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton suggests that they are a member or supporter of the Democratic Party.
[ "In", "this", "passage,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "include:", "1.", "Supporters", "of", "Bernie", "Sanders:", "The", "author", "mentions", "that", "they", "voted", "for", "Bernie,", "indicating", "that", "they", "are", "a", "supporter", "of", "his", "campaign.", "2.", "Supporters", "of", "Hillary", "Clinton:", "The", "author", "states", "that", "they", "believe", "Hillary", "Clinton", "would", "make", "a", "good", "president", "and", "that", "she", "is", "an", "exceptional", "listener.", "3.", "The", "Right:", "The", "author", "mentions", "that", "\"most", "of", "the", "shit", "that", "drips", "off", "Clinton", "is", "shit", "the", "right", "has", "thrown", "at", "her", "since", "the", "'90s,\"", "implying", "that", "they", "are", "a", "group", "with", "conservative", "political", "beliefs.", "4.", "The", "Media:", "The", "author", "mentions", "that", "Australia's", "first", "female", "prime", "minister", "was", "crucified", "by", "the", "media,", "suggesting", "that", "they", "are", "a", "powerful", "social", "group", "with", "the", "ability", "to", "shape", "public", "opinion.", "5.", "The", "Republican", "Party:", "The", "author", "mentions", "that", "Hillary", "Clinton", "will", "have", "to", "work", "with", "the", "Republicans,", "indicating", "that", "they", "are", "a", "social", "group", "with", "significant", "political", "power", "in", "the", "United", "States.", "6.", "The", "Democratic", "Party:", "Although", "not", "explicitly", "mentioned,", "the", "author's", "support", "for", "Bernie", "Sanders", "and", "Hillary", "Clinton", "suggests", "that", "they", "are", "a", "member", "or", "supporter", "of", "the", "Democratic", "Party." ]
184
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .
d0dlkoh
politics
2,016
meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .
meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .
meanwhile trump gets the negative headlines . obama can fart on a reporter and they are so afraid to be censored that they have to write flowers and rainbows .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "meanwhile", "trump", "gets", "the", "negative", "headlines", ".", "obama", "can", "fart", "on", "a", "reporter", "and", "they", "are", "so", "afraid", "to", "be", "censored", "that", "they", "have", "to", "write", "flowers", "and", "rainbows", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in this statement are: 1. Political figures: Trump and Obama 2. The media or reporters The statement appears to imply a bias in the media, suggesting that reporters treat Obama more favorably than Trump. It also suggests a power dynamic, with reporters being afraid to criticize Obama.
The social groups mentioned in this statement are: 1. Political figures: Trump and Obama 2. The media or reporters The statement appears to imply a bias in the media, suggesting that reporters treat Obama more favorably than Trump. It also suggests a power dynamic, with reporters being afraid to criticize Obama.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "this", "statement", "are:", "1.", "Political", "figures:", "Trump", "and", "Obama", "2.", "The", "media", "or", "reporters", "The", "statement", "appears", "to", "imply", "a", "bias", "in", "the", "media,", "suggesting", "that", "reporters", "treat", "Obama", "more", "favorably", "than", "Trump.", "It", "also", "suggests", "a", "power", "dynamic,", "with", "reporters", "being", "afraid", "to", "criticize", "Obama." ]
51
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal
d82hfm5
politics
2,016
none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal
none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal
none of that involved illegal activity . controversy is not scandal
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "none", "of", "that", "involved", "illegal", "activity", ".", "controversy", "is", "not", "scandal" ]
I apologize, but your question is a bit unclear. However, I will try to provide an answer regarding mentions of social groups that do not involve illegal activity or scandal, and instead involve some form of controversy. Controversial topics related to social groups include: 1. Affirmative Action: This is a policy that aims to provide equal opportunities to historically marginalized groups in areas such as education and employment. While it is designed to address past discrimination and promote diversity, it has been a source of controversy, with critics arguing that it disadvantages other groups and compromises merit-based selection. 2. Gender Identity: The rights and protections of transgender and gender non-conforming individuals have been a topic of controversy. Some argue that allowing people to use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity will increase safety for this group, while others argue that it will compromise the safety of cisgender women and girls. 3. Immigration: The policies and practices surrounding immigration have been a source of controversy. Some argue that stricter immigration policies are necessary to protect national security and maintain national identity, while others argue that they are inhumane and disproportionately affect marginalized groups. 4. Race and Racism: Issues related to race and racism, such as police brutality and systemic racism, have been a source of controversy. Some argue that these issues are symptoms of deeper societal problems, while others argue that they are isolated incidents perpetrated by a few bad actors. 5. Religious Freedom: The extent to which religious beliefs should be accommodated in public life has been a topic of controversy. Some argue that allowing people to express their religious beliefs is necessary to protect freedom of conscience, while others argue that it can be used to discriminate against marginalized groups. I hope this answers your question. Let me know if you have any further queries.
I apologize, but your question is a bit unclear. However, I will try to provide an answer regarding mentions of social groups that do not involve illegal activity or scandal, and instead involve some form of controversy. Controversial topics related to social groups include: 1. Affirmative Action: This is a policy that aims to provide equal opportunities to historically marginalized groups in areas such as education and employment. While it is designed to address past discrimination and promote diversity, it has been a source of controversy, with critics arguing that it disadvantages other groups and compromises merit-based selection. 2. Gender Identity: The rights and protections of transgender and gender non-conforming individuals have been a topic of controversy. Some argue that allowing people to use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity will increase safety for this group, while others argue that it will compromise the safety of cisgender women and girls. 3. Immigration: The policies and practices surrounding immigration have been a source of controversy. Some argue that stricter immigration policies are necessary to protect national security and maintain national identity, while others argue that they are inhumane and disproportionately affect marginalized groups. 4. Race and Racism: Issues related to race and racism, such as police brutality and systemic racism, have been a source of controversy. Some argue that these issues are symptoms of deeper societal problems, while others argue that they are isolated incidents perpetrated by a few bad actors. 5. Religious Freedom: The extent to which religious beliefs should be accommodated in public life has been a topic of controversy. Some argue that allowing people to express their religious beliefs is necessary to protect freedom of conscience, while others argue that it can be used to discriminate against marginalized groups. I hope this answers your question. Let me know if you have any further queries.
[ "I", "apologize,", "but", "your", "question", "is", "a", "bit", "unclear.", "However,", "I", "will", "try", "to", "provide", "an", "answer", "regarding", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups", "that", "do", "not", "involve", "illegal", "activity", "or", "scandal,", "and", "instead", "involve", "some", "form", "of", "controversy.", "Controversial", "topics", "related", "to", "social", "groups", "include:", "1.", "Affirmative", "Action:", "This", "is", "a", "policy", "that", "aims", "to", "provide", "equal", "opportunities", "to", "historically", "marginalized", "groups", "in", "areas", "such", "as", "education", "and", "employment.", "While", "it", "is", "designed", "to", "address", "past", "discrimination", "and", "promote", "diversity,", "it", "has", "been", "a", "source", "of", "controversy,", "with", "critics", "arguing", "that", "it", "disadvantages", "other", "groups", "and", "compromises", "merit-based", "selection.", "2.", "Gender", "Identity:", "The", "rights", "and", "protections", "of", "transgender", "and", "gender", "non-conforming", "individuals", "have", "been", "a", "topic", "of", "controversy.", "Some", "argue", "that", "allowing", "people", "to", "use", "the", "bathroom", "that", "aligns", "with", "their", "gender", "identity", "will", "increase", "safety", "for", "this", "group,", "while", "others", "argue", "that", "it", "will", "compromise", "the", "safety", "of", "cisgender", "women", "and", "girls.", "3.", "Immigration:", "The", "policies", "and", "practices", "surrounding", "immigration", "have", "been", "a", "source", "of", "controversy.", "Some", "argue", "that", "stricter", "immigration", "policies", "are", "necessary", "to", "protect", "national", "security", "and", "maintain", "national", "identity,", "while", "others", "argue", "that", "they", "are", "inhumane", "and", "disproportionately", "affect", "marginalized", "groups.", "4.", "Race", "and", "Racism:", "Issues", "related", "to", "race", "and", "racism,", "such", "as", "police", "brutality", "and", "systemic", "racism,", "have", "been", "a", "source", "of", "controversy.", "Some", "argue", "that", "these", "issues", "are", "symptoms", "of", "deeper", "societal", "problems,", "while", "others", "argue", "that", "they", "are", "isolated", "incidents", "perpetrated", "by", "a", "few", "bad", "actors.", "5.", "Religious", "Freedom:", "The", "extent", "to", "which", "religious", "beliefs", "should", "be", "accommodated", "in", "public", "life", "has", "been", "a", "topic", "of", "controversy.", "Some", "argue", "that", "allowing", "people", "to", "express", "their", "religious", "beliefs", "is", "necessary", "to", "protect", "freedom", "of", "conscience,", "while", "others", "argue", "that", "it", "can", "be", "used", "to", "discriminate", "against", "marginalized", "groups.", "I", "hope", "this", "answers", "your", "question.", "Let", "me", "know", "if", "you", "have", "any", "further", "queries." ]
308
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...
d2unybf
politics
2,016
ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...
ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...
ever do it for a doctor ? it 's like they do n't want to learn for fear of losing their doctoring abilities ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "ever", "do", "it", "for", "a", "doctor", "?", "it", "'s", "like", "they", "do", "n't", "want", "to", "learn", "for", "fear", "of", "losing", "their", "doctoring", "abilities", "..." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are "doctors" and "their doctoring abilities." The speaker seems to suggest that doctors may be resistant to learning new things because they fear it might negatively impact their medical skills or profession.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are "doctors" and "their doctoring abilities." The speaker seems to suggest that doctors may be resistant to learning new things because they fear it might negatively impact their medical skills or profession.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are", "\"doctors\"", "and", "\"their", "doctoring", "abilities.\"", "The", "speaker", "seems", "to", "suggest", "that", "doctors", "may", "be", "resistant", "to", "learning", "new", "things", "because", "they", "fear", "it", "might", "negatively", "impact", "their", "medical", "skills", "or", "profession." ]
39
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the american people are wise enough to just say no .
d3kn4fr
politics
2,016
that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .
that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .
that 's about as likely as a president maduro '' . in case you missed , the effect of socialism are on full display and the @@american people## are wise enough to just say no .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "'s", "about", "as", "likely", "as", "a", "president", "maduro", "``", ".", "in", "case", "you", "missed", ",", "the", "effect", "of", "socialism", "are", "on", "full", "display", "and", "the", "american", "people", "are", "wise", "enough", "to", "just", "say", "no", "." ]
The social groups mentioned in the statement are: 1. The presidency of Maduro, which implies the political group or regime associated with him in Venezuela. 2. The American people, which refers to the citizens of the United States, a large social group with shared nationality. 3. The statement also implies a comparison between the political situation in Venezuela (associated with socialism) and the United States, suggesting a potential social group of political ideologies, namely those who support or oppose socialism.
The social groups mentioned in the statement are: 1. The presidency of Maduro, which implies the political group or regime associated with him in Venezuela. 2. The American people, which refers to the citizens of the United States, a large social group with shared nationality. 3. The statement also implies a comparison between the political situation in Venezuela (associated with socialism) and the United States, suggesting a potential social group of political ideologies, namely those who support or oppose socialism.
[ "The", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "in", "the", "statement", "are:", "1.", "The", "presidency", "of", "Maduro,", "which", "implies", "the", "political", "group", "or", "regime", "associated", "with", "him", "in", "Venezuela.", "2.", "The", "American", "people,", "which", "refers", "to", "the", "citizens", "of", "the", "United", "States,", "a", "large", "social", "group", "with", "shared", "nationality.", "3.", "The", "statement", "also", "implies", "a", "comparison", "between", "the", "political", "situation", "in", "Venezuela", "(associated", "with", "socialism)", "and", "the", "United", "States,", "suggesting", "a", "potential", "social", "group", "of", "political", "ideologies,", "namely", "those", "who", "support", "or", "oppose", "socialism." ]
80
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?
d4k2o2t
politics
2,016
and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?
and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?
and how do you feel that she took advantage of the war that was ongoing in bosnia for political gain when she claimed she landed in bosnia whilst under sniper fire ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "how", "do", "you", "feel", "that", "she", "took", "advantage", "of", "the", "war", "that", "was", "ongoing", "in", "bosnia", "for", "political", "gain", "when", "she", "claimed", "she", "landed", "in", "bosnia", "whilst", "under", "sniper", "fire", "?" ]
In the excerpt you provided, there are a few mentions of social groups:
In the excerpt you provided, there are a few mentions of social groups:
[ "In", "the", "excerpt", "you", "provided,", "there", "are", "a", "few", "mentions", "of", "social", "groups:" ]
13
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some clinton supporters say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of bernie supporters . i believe it does the opposite .
d1qqkqz
politics
2,016
i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .
i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .
i agree with what the article is stating . i will be voting 3rd party unless its clinton vs cruz . then i might shoot myself . but , i 've seen some @@clinton supporters## say the very thing i posted about the dem primary . it 's meant to sap morale of @@bernie supporters## . i believe it does the opposite .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "agree", "with", "what", "the", "article", "is", "stating", ".", "i", "will", "be", "voting", "3rd", "party", "unless", "its", "clinton", "vs", "cruz", ".", "then", "i", "might", "shoot", "myself", ".", "but", ",", "i", "'ve", "seen", "some", "clinton", "supporters", "say", "the", "very", "thing", "i", "posted", "about", "the", "dem", "primary", ".", "it", "'s", "meant", "to", "sap", "morale", "of", "bernie", "supporters", ".", "i", "believe", "it", "does", "the", "opposite", "." ]
In this statement, the social groups mentioned are: 1. The person making the statement, who is considering voting for a third party candidate unless the election is between Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz, in which case they might "shoot myself." This statement suggests that the person is politically engaged and has strong opinions about the candidates. 2. Bernie supporters, who are referred to when the person says that they have seen Clinton supporters say the same thing about the Democratic primary that the person posted about. This suggests that the person is part of, or at least sympathetic to, the group of people who supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary. 3. Clinton supporters, who are referred to when the person says that they have seen Clinton supporters say the same thing about the Democratic primary that the person posted about. This suggests that the person is aware of, and has opinions about, the group of people who supported Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. These social groups are all related to the 2016 US presidential election, and the person's views and opinions about the candidates and the primary election process.
In this statement, the social groups mentioned are: 1. The person making the statement, who is considering voting for a third party candidate unless the election is between Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz, in which case they might "shoot myself." This statement suggests that the person is politically engaged and has strong opinions about the candidates. 2. Bernie supporters, who are referred to when the person says that they have seen Clinton supporters say the same thing about the Democratic primary that the person posted about. This suggests that the person is part of, or at least sympathetic to, the group of people who supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary. 3. Clinton supporters, who are referred to when the person says that they have seen Clinton supporters say the same thing about the Democratic primary that the person posted about. This suggests that the person is aware of, and has opinions about, the group of people who supported Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. These social groups are all related to the 2016 US presidential election, and the person's views and opinions about the candidates and the primary election process.
[ "In", "this", "statement,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "are:", "1.", "The", "person", "making", "the", "statement,", "who", "is", "considering", "voting", "for", "a", "third", "party", "candidate", "unless", "the", "election", "is", "between", "Hillary", "Clinton", "and", "Ted", "Cruz,", "in", "which", "case", "they", "might", "\"shoot", "myself.\"", "This", "statement", "suggests", "that", "the", "person", "is", "politically", "engaged", "and", "has", "strong", "opinions", "about", "the", "candidates.", "2.", "Bernie", "supporters,", "who", "are", "referred", "to", "when", "the", "person", "says", "that", "they", "have", "seen", "Clinton", "supporters", "say", "the", "same", "thing", "about", "the", "Democratic", "primary", "that", "the", "person", "posted", "about.", "This", "suggests", "that", "the", "person", "is", "part", "of,", "or", "at", "least", "sympathetic", "to,", "the", "group", "of", "people", "who", "supported", "Bernie", "Sanders", "in", "the", "Democratic", "primary.", "3.", "Clinton", "supporters,", "who", "are", "referred", "to", "when", "the", "person", "says", "that", "they", "have", "seen", "Clinton", "supporters", "say", "the", "same", "thing", "about", "the", "Democratic", "primary", "that", "the", "person", "posted", "about.", "This", "suggests", "that", "the", "person", "is", "aware", "of,", "and", "has", "opinions", "about,", "the", "group", "of", "people", "who", "supported", "Hillary", "Clinton", "in", "the", "Democratic", "primary.", "These", "social", "groups", "are", "all", "related", "to", "the", "2016", "US", "presidential", "election,", "and", "the", "person's", "views", "and", "opinions", "about", "the", "candidates", "and", "the", "primary", "election", "process." ]
191
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump
d5r1sbu
politics
2,016
give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump
give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump
give me reasons to dislike hillary . why should n't i vote for her instead of gary or even trump
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "give", "me", "reasons", "to", "dislike", "hillary", ".", "why", "should", "n't", "i", "vote", "for", "her", "instead", "of", "gary", "or", "even", "trump" ]
There are various social groups that have been mentioned in discussions about Hillary Clinton, some of which have been the subject of criticism. Here are a few examples: 1. Wall Street: Clinton has been criticized for her ties to Wall Street and the large sums of money she has received in speaking fees and campaign contributions from financial institutions. Some argue that this makes her beholden to the interests of the financial industry and that she will not take sufficient action to regulate them. 2. Big Business: Clinton has also been accused of being too close to big business and corporate interests, which some critics argue has influenced her policy positions and led her to support trade deals that have hurt American workers. 3. The Establishment: Clinton has been labeled as part of the political establishment, which some voters see as a negative. Critics argue that she represents the status quo and is unlikely to bring about significant change. 4. The Clintons: Some critics mention the Clintons as a social group, arguing that Hillary Clinton's policy positions and actions have been influenced by her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and their political alliance. As for reasons not to vote for Clinton over Gary Johnson or even Donald Trump, here are a few: 1. Lack of Trust: Many voters have expressed concerns about Clinton's honesty and trustworthiness. This has been fueled by her use of a private email server while serving as Secretary of State and the ongoing investigations into her handling of classified information. 2. Political History: Some voters are opposed to Clinton because of her political history and the policies she has supported in the past. For instance, she has been criticized for her support of the Iraq War and her vote in favor of the 2000 trade agreement with China. 3. Double Standards: Some argue that Clinton is held to a different standard than her male counterparts and that there is a level of sexism at play in the criticism she receives. 4. Not Progressive Enough: Some voters view Clinton as too moderate or not progressive enough, particularly when compared to Bernie Sanders. They argue that she is not committed to progressive policies such as single-payer healthcare and free college education. 5. Trump vs Clinton: Ultimately, the decision to vote for Clinton, Johnson, or Trump may come down to a simple comparison of the two major party candidates. Some voters may view Trump as a greater threat to democracy and the stability
There are various social groups that have been mentioned in discussions about Hillary Clinton, some of which have been the subject of criticism. Here are a few examples: 1. Wall Street: Clinton has been criticized for her ties to Wall Street and the large sums of money she has received in speaking fees and campaign contributions from financial institutions. Some argue that this makes her beholden to the interests of the financial industry and that she will not take sufficient action to regulate them. 2. Big Business: Clinton has also been accused of being too close to big business and corporate interests, which some critics argue has influenced her policy positions and led her to support trade deals that have hurt American workers. 3. The Establishment: Clinton has been labeled as part of the political establishment, which some voters see as a negative. Critics argue that she represents the status quo and is unlikely to bring about significant change. 4. The Clintons: Some critics mention the Clintons as a social group, arguing that Hillary Clinton's policy positions and actions have been influenced by her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and their political alliance. As for reasons not to vote for Clinton over Gary Johnson or even Donald Trump, here are a few: 1. Lack of Trust: Many voters have expressed concerns about Clinton's honesty and trustworthiness. This has been fueled by her use of a private email server while serving as Secretary of State and the ongoing investigations into her handling of classified information. 2. Political History: Some voters are opposed to Clinton because of her political history and the policies she has supported in the past. For instance, she has been criticized for her support of the Iraq War and her vote in favor of the 2000 trade agreement with China. 3. Double Standards: Some argue that Clinton is held to a different standard than her male counterparts and that there is a level of sexism at play in the criticism she receives. 4. Not Progressive Enough: Some voters view Clinton as too moderate or not progressive enough, particularly when compared to Bernie Sanders. They argue that she is not committed to progressive policies such as single-payer healthcare and free college education. 5. Trump vs Clinton: Ultimately, the decision to vote for Clinton, Johnson, or Trump may come down to a simple comparison of the two major party candidates. Some voters may view Trump as a greater threat to democracy and the stability
[ "There", "are", "various", "social", "groups", "that", "have", "been", "mentioned", "in", "discussions", "about", "Hillary", "Clinton,", "some", "of", "which", "have", "been", "the", "subject", "of", "criticism.", "Here", "are", "a", "few", "examples:", "1.", "Wall", "Street:", "Clinton", "has", "been", "criticized", "for", "her", "ties", "to", "Wall", "Street", "and", "the", "large", "sums", "of", "money", "she", "has", "received", "in", "speaking", "fees", "and", "campaign", "contributions", "from", "financial", "institutions.", "Some", "argue", "that", "this", "makes", "her", "beholden", "to", "the", "interests", "of", "the", "financial", "industry", "and", "that", "she", "will", "not", "take", "sufficient", "action", "to", "regulate", "them.", "2.", "Big", "Business:", "Clinton", "has", "also", "been", "accused", "of", "being", "too", "close", "to", "big", "business", "and", "corporate", "interests,", "which", "some", "critics", "argue", "has", "influenced", "her", "policy", "positions", "and", "led", "her", "to", "support", "trade", "deals", "that", "have", "hurt", "American", "workers.", "3.", "The", "Establishment:", "Clinton", "has", "been", "labeled", "as", "part", "of", "the", "political", "establishment,", "which", "some", "voters", "see", "as", "a", "negative.", "Critics", "argue", "that", "she", "represents", "the", "status", "quo", "and", "is", "unlikely", "to", "bring", "about", "significant", "change.", "4.", "The", "Clintons:", "Some", "critics", "mention", "the", "Clintons", "as", "a", "social", "group,", "arguing", "that", "Hillary", "Clinton's", "policy", "positions", "and", "actions", "have", "been", "influenced", "by", "her", "husband,", "former", "President", "Bill", "Clinton,", "and", "their", "political", "alliance.", "As", "for", "reasons", "not", "to", "vote", "for", "Clinton", "over", "Gary", "Johnson", "or", "even", "Donald", "Trump,", "here", "are", "a", "few:", "1.", "Lack", "of", "Trust:", "Many", "voters", "have", "expressed", "concerns", "about", "Clinton's", "honesty", "and", "trustworthiness.", "This", "has", "been", "fueled", "by", "her", "use", "of", "a", "private", "email", "server", "while", "serving", "as", "Secretary", "of", "State", "and", "the", "ongoing", "investigations", "into", "her", "handling", "of", "classified", "information.", "2.", "Political", "History:", "Some", "voters", "are", "opposed", "to", "Clinton", "because", "of", "her", "political", "history", "and", "the", "policies", "she", "has", "supported", "in", "the", "past.", "For", "instance,", "she", "has", "been", "criticized", "for", "her", "support", "of", "the", "Iraq", "War", "and", "her", "vote", "in", "favor", "of", "the", "2000", "trade", "agreement", "with", "China.", "3.", "Double", "Standards:", "Some", "argue", "that", "Clinton", "is", "held", "to", "a", "different", "standard", "than", "her", "male", "counterparts", "and", "that", "there", "is", "a", "level", "of", "sexism", "at", "play", "in", "the", "criticism", "she", "receives.", "4.", "Not", "Progressive", "Enough:", "Some", "voters", "view", "Clinton", "as", "too", "moderate", "or", "not", "progressive", "enough,", "particularly", "when", "compared", "to", "Bernie", "Sanders.", "They", "argue", "that", "she", "is", "not", "committed", "to", "progressive", "policies", "such", "as", "single-payer", "healthcare", "and", "free", "college", "education.", "5.", "Trump", "vs", "Clinton:", "Ultimately,", "the", "decision", "to", "vote", "for", "Clinton,", "Johnson,", "or", "Trump", "may", "come", "down", "to", "a", "simple", "comparison", "of", "the", "two", "major", "party", "candidates.", "Some", "voters", "may", "view", "Trump", "as", "a", "greater", "threat", "to", "democracy", "and", "the", "stability" ]
414
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .
d9nkczj
politics
2,016
no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .
no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .
no we 're not voting for the corrupt queen which cheated us .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", "we", "'re", "not", "voting", "for", "the", "corrupt", "queen", "which", "cheated", "us", "." ]
In this statement, the social groups mentioned are "we" and "the corrupt queen." The group referred to as "we" likely consists of the individuals who feel they have been cheated by the queen. The queen, being referred to as "corrupt," suggests that she is a social group of one, holding a position of power and authority. By stating that "we" are not voting for her, the speaker is indicating a divide or conflict between these two social groups.
In this statement, the social groups mentioned are "we" and "the corrupt queen." The group referred to as "we" likely consists of the individuals who feel they have been cheated by the queen. The queen, being referred to as "corrupt," suggests that she is a social group of one, holding a position of power and authority. By stating that "we" are not voting for her, the speaker is indicating a divide or conflict between these two social groups.
[ "In", "this", "statement,", "the", "social", "groups", "mentioned", "are", "\"we\"", "and", "\"the", "corrupt", "queen.\"", "The", "group", "referred", "to", "as", "\"we\"", "likely", "consists", "of", "the", "individuals", "who", "feel", "they", "have", "been", "cheated", "by", "the", "queen.", "The", "queen,", "being", "referred", "to", "as", "\"corrupt,\"", "suggests", "that", "she", "is", "a", "social", "group", "of", "one,", "holding", "a", "position", "of", "power", "and", "authority.", "By", "stating", "that", "\"we\"", "are", "not", "voting", "for", "her,", "the", "speaker", "is", "indicating", "a", "divide", "or", "conflict", "between", "these", "two", "social", "groups." ]
78
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
ben carson ai n't in the cabinet , the white house or the justice dpt , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .
dalk194
politics
2,016
ben carson ai n't in @@the cabinet## , @@the white house## or the @@justice dpt## , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .
ben carson ai n't in the cabinet , the white house or the justice dpt , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .
ben carson ai n't in @@the cabinet## , @@the white house## or the @@justice dpt## , dude . best look over your answer sheet for errors there .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "ben", "carson", "ai", "n't", "in", "the", "cabinet", ",", "the", "white", "house", "or", "the", "justice", "dpt", ",", "dude", ".", "best", "look", "over", "your", "answer", "sheet", "for", "errors", "there", "." ]
The mention of social groups in the statement are: 1. Ben Carson - He is mentioned as an individual, but he is also a member of several social groups, including being an African American and a member of the Cabinet (as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development). 2. The Cabinet - This is a social group made up of the highest-ranking officials in the executive branch of the US government, who are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. 3. The White House - This is a metonym for the President and his advisors, who make up another social group. 4. The Justice Department - This is another social group, made up of the lawyers and officials who work for the Department of Justice. The statement also implies a criticism of the racial makeup of these social groups, suggesting that the person being addressed should "best look over your answer sheet for errors there." This could be interpreted as a call to pay more attention to issues of diversity and inclusion within these social groups.
The mention of social groups in the statement are: 1. Ben Carson - He is mentioned as an individual, but he is also a member of several social groups, including being an African American and a member of the Cabinet (as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development). 2. The Cabinet - This is a social group made up of the highest-ranking officials in the executive branch of the US government, who are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. 3. The White House - This is a metonym for the President and his advisors, who make up another social group. 4. The Justice Department - This is another social group, made up of the lawyers and officials who work for the Department of Justice. The statement also implies a criticism of the racial makeup of these social groups, suggesting that the person being addressed should "best look over your answer sheet for errors there." This could be interpreted as a call to pay more attention to issues of diversity and inclusion within these social groups.
[ "The", "mention", "of", "social", "groups", "in", "the", "statement", "are:", "1.", "Ben", "Carson", "-", "He", "is", "mentioned", "as", "an", "individual,", "but", "he", "is", "also", "a", "member", "of", "several", "social", "groups,", "including", "being", "an", "African", "American", "and", "a", "member", "of", "the", "Cabinet", "(as", "the", "Secretary", "of", "Housing", "and", "Urban", "Development).", "2.", "The", "Cabinet", "-", "This", "is", "a", "social", "group", "made", "up", "of", "the", "highest-ranking", "officials", "in", "the", "executive", "branch", "of", "the", "US", "government,", "who", "are", "appointed", "by", "the", "President", "and", "confirmed", "by", "the", "Senate.", "3.", "The", "White", "House", "-", "This", "is", "a", "metonym", "for", "the", "President", "and", "his", "advisors,", "who", "make", "up", "another", "social", "group.", "4.", "The", "Justice", "Department", "-", "This", "is", "another", "social", "group,", "made", "up", "of", "the", "lawyers", "and", "officials", "who", "work", "for", "the", "Department", "of", "Justice.", "The", "statement", "also", "implies", "a", "criticism", "of", "the", "racial", "makeup", "of", "these", "social", "groups,", "suggesting", "that", "the", "person", "being", "addressed", "should", "\"best", "look", "over", "your", "answer", "sheet", "for", "errors", "there.\"", "This", "could", "be", "interpreted", "as", "a", "call", "to", "pay", "more", "attention", "to", "issues", "of", "diversity", "and", "inclusion", "within", "these", "social", "groups." ]
178
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]