Datasets:
Farjfar
/
SGS

Dataset card Viewer Files Community
1
body_cleaned
stringlengths
28
4.28k
id
stringlengths
4
7
subreddit
stringclasses
3 values
year
int64
2.01k
2.02k
annotation1
stringlengths
28
4.33k
annotation2
stringlengths
28
4.34k
gold_annotation
stringlengths
28
4.34k
bio_annotation
sequencelengths
6
841
ids
sequencelengths
6
841
tokenized_body_cleaned
sequencelengths
6
841
because that 's impossible . that 's a good point . this argument is meant to bring up the negative possibilities and costbenefit of doing a good deed . '' if you think you are helping the employees through this deed , then why not increase it more ? because it has possible downsides that few seem to look at . so making the absurd statement that so many do that raising the minimum wage helps the poor with out qualifiers can only be countered with another absurd statement .
cbk1762
Economics
2,013
because that 's impossible . that 's a good point . this argument is meant to bring up the negative possibilities and costbenefit of doing a good deed . '' if you think you are helping the @@employees## through this deed , then why not increase it more ? because it has possible downsides that few seem to look at . so making the absurd statement that so many do that raising the minimum wage helps @@the poor## with out qualifiers can only be countered with another absurd statement .
because that 's impossible . that 's a good point . this argument is meant to bring up the negative possibilities and costbenefit of doing a good deed . '' if you think you are helping the @@employees## through this deed , then why not increase it more ? because it has possible downsides that few seem to look at . so making the absurd statement that so many do that raising the minimum wage helps the poor with out qualifiers can only be countered with another absurd statement .
because that 's impossible . that 's a good point . this argument is meant to bring up the negative possibilities and costbenefit of doing a good deed . '' if you think you are helping the @@employees## through this deed , then why not increase it more ? because it has possible downsides that few seem to look at . so making the absurd statement that so many do that raising the minimum wage helps @@the poor## with out qualifiers can only be countered with another absurd statement .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "that", "'s", "impossible", ".", "that", "'s", "a", "good", "point", ".", "this", "argument", "is", "meant", "to", "bring", "up", "the", "negative", "possibilities", "and", "costbenefit", "of", "doing", "a", "good", "deed", ".", "``", "if", "you", "think", "you", "are", "helping", "the", "employees", "through", "this", "deed", ",", "then", "why", "not", "increase", "it", "more", "?", "because", "it", "has", "possible", "downsides", "that", "few", "seem", "to", "look", "at", ".", "so", "making", "the", "absurd", "statement", "that", "so", "many", "do", "that", "raising", "the", "minimum", "wage", "helps", "the", "poor", "with", "out", "qualifiers", "can", "only", "be", "countered", "with", "another", "absurd", "statement", "." ]
the unemployment rate for college graduates is far lower than it is for noncollege grads . in fact , the unemployment rate for college graduates is actually under the natural unemployment rate '' for all members of the workforce , even during this recession . i 'd rather drive a taxi than not have a job at all . sure it 's not my dream job , but it 'll put some food on the table .
caqryss
Economics
2,013
the unemployment rate for @@college graduates## is far lower than it is for @@noncollege grads## . in fact , the unemployment rate for @@college graduates## is actually under the natural unemployment rate '' for all @@members of the workforce## , even during this recession . i 'd rather drive a taxi than not have a job at all . sure it 's not my dream job , but it 'll put some food on the table .
the unemployment rate for @@college graduates## is far lower than it is for @@noncollege grads## . in fact , the unemployment rate for @@college graduates## is actually under the natural unemployment rate '' for all @@members of the workforce## , even during this recession . i 'd rather drive a taxi than not have a job at all . sure it 's not my dream job , but it 'll put some food on the table .
the unemployment rate for @@college graduates## is far lower than it is for @@noncollege grads## . in fact , the unemployment rate for @@college graduates## is actually under the natural unemployment rate '' for all @@members of the workforce## , even during this recession . i 'd rather drive a taxi than not have a job at all . sure it 's not my dream job , but it 'll put some food on the table .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "unemployment", "rate", "for", "college", "graduates", "is", "far", "lower", "than", "it", "is", "for", "noncollege", "grads", ".", "in", "fact", ",", "the", "unemployment", "rate", "for", "college", "graduates", "is", "actually", "under", "the", "natural", "unemployment", "rate", "``", "for", "all", "members", "of", "the", "workforce", ",", "even", "during", "this", "recession", ".", "i", "'d", "rather", "drive", "a", "taxi", "than", "not", "have", "a", "job", "at", "all", ".", "sure", "it", "'s", "not", "my", "dream", "job", ",", "but", "it", "'ll", "put", "some", "food", "on", "the", "table", "." ]
the fuck ? what idiots are upvoting this nonsequitor ?
c82qvak
Economics
2,013
the fuck ? what idiots are upvoting this nonsequitor ?
the fuck ? what @@idiots## are upvoting this nonsequitor ?
the fuck ? what @@idiots## are upvoting this nonsequitor ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "fuck", "?", "what", "idiots", "are", "upvoting", "this", "nonsequitor", "?" ]
seriously , who keeps upvoting these articles ? i feel like they 're being upvoted based solely on the title by people who agree with the thesis , but did n't actually read it . the arguments in here ca n't even be called specious they 're just straight up bad .
ceyl4pf
Economics
2,014
seriously , who keeps upvoting these articles ? i feel like they 're being upvoted based solely on the title by people who agree with the thesis , but did n't actually read it . the arguments in here ca n't even be called specious they 're just straight up bad .
seriously , who keeps upvoting these articles ? i feel like they 're being upvoted based solely on the title by @@people who agree with the thesis## , but did n't actually read it . the arguments in here ca n't even be called specious they 're just straight up bad .
seriously , who keeps upvoting these articles ? i feel like they 're being upvoted based solely on the title by people who agree with the thesis , but did n't actually read it . the arguments in here ca n't even be called specious they 're just straight up bad .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "seriously", ",", "who", "keeps", "upvoting", "these", "articles", "?", "i", "feel", "like", "they", "'re", "being", "upvoted", "based", "solely", "on", "the", "title", "by", "people", "who", "agree", "with", "the", "thesis", ",", "but", "did", "n't", "actually", "read", "it", ".", "the", "arguments", "in", "here", "ca", "n't", "even", "be", "called", "specious", "they", "'re", "just", "straight", "up", "bad", "." ]
what i meant was , would a 0.1 change in u3 usually coincide with a 0.1 or 0.1x change in u6 , such that comparing u3 in two periods is somewhat meaningful without knowing both u6 's .
cmmepua
Economics
2,014
what i meant was , would a 0.1 change in u3 usually coincide with a 0.1 or 0.1x change in u6 , such that comparing u3 in two periods is somewhat meaningful without knowing both u6 's .
what i meant was , would a 0.1 change in u3 usually coincide with a 0.1 or 0.1x change in u6 , such that comparing u3 in two periods is somewhat meaningful without knowing both u6 's .
what i meant was , would a 0.1 change in u3 usually coincide with a 0.1 or 0.1x change in u6 , such that comparing u3 in two periods is somewhat meaningful without knowing both u6 's .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "i", "meant", "was", ",", "would", "a", "0.1", "change", "in", "u3", "usually", "coincide", "with", "a", "0.1", "or", "0.1x", "change", "in", "u6", ",", "such", "that", "comparing", "u3", "in", "two", "periods", "is", "somewhat", "meaningful", "without", "knowing", "both", "u6", "'s", "." ]
but the 10.10 will increase total income by 2 billion and the 9.00 by 1 billion . seems like a good deal . also they probably take into account that something like 15 of the population live in states with minimum wages higher than the proposed federal increased wage .
chd4vd5
Economics
2,014
but the 10.10 will increase total income by 2 billion and the 9.00 by 1 billion . seems like a good deal . also they probably take into account that something like 15 of the population live in states with minimum wages higher than the proposed federal increased wage .
but the 10.10 will increase total income by 2 billion and the 9.00 by 1 billion . seems like a good deal . also they probably take into account that something like 15 of the population live in states with minimum wages higher than the proposed federal increased wage .
but the 10.10 will increase total income by 2 billion and the 9.00 by 1 billion . seems like a good deal . also they probably take into account that something like 15 of the population live in states with minimum wages higher than the proposed federal increased wage .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "the", "10.10", "will", "increase", "total", "income", "by", "2", "billion", "and", "the", "9.00", "by", "1", "billion", ".", "seems", "like", "a", "good", "deal", ".", "also", "they", "probably", "take", "into", "account", "that", "something", "like", "15", "of", "the", "population", "live", "in", "states", "with", "minimum", "wages", "higher", "than", "the", "proposed", "federal", "increased", "wage", "." ]
sure they will . but at the expense of others , who would also have consumedinvested in their place . you can say you think its fairer or moral or whatever , but i do n't see how it boosts aggregate demand .
ch7zuc2
Economics
2,014
sure they will . but at the expense of others , who would also have consumedinvested in their place . you can say you think its fairer or moral or whatever , but i do n't see how it boosts aggregate demand .
sure they will . but at the expense of others , who would also have consumedinvested in their place . you can say you think its fairer or moral or whatever , but i do n't see how it boosts aggregate demand .
sure they will . but at the expense of others , who would also have consumedinvested in their place . you can say you think its fairer or moral or whatever , but i do n't see how it boosts aggregate demand .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "sure", "they", "will", ".", "but", "at", "the", "expense", "of", "others", ",", "who", "would", "also", "have", "consumedinvested", "in", "their", "place", ".", "you", "can", "say", "you", "think", "its", "fairer", "or", "moral", "or", "whatever", ",", "but", "i", "do", "n't", "see", "how", "it", "boosts", "aggregate", "demand", "." ]
that money is being spent on interest , not education .
choetvm
Economics
2,014
that money is being spent on interest , not education .
that money is being spent on interest , not education .
that money is being spent on interest , not education .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "money", "is", "being", "spent", "on", "interest", ",", "not", "education", "." ]
if they ca n't do both then they deserve to fail . you ca n't claim to support free markets on one hand while literally handing the welfare applications to your employees with the other .
clkyxpy
Economics
2,014
if they ca n't do both then they deserve to fail . you ca n't claim to support free markets on one hand while literally handing the welfare applications to your @@employees## with the other .
if they ca n't do both then they deserve to fail . you ca n't claim to support free markets on one hand while literally handing the welfare applications to your @@employees## with the other .
if they ca n't do both then they deserve to fail . you ca n't claim to support free markets on one hand while literally handing the welfare applications to your @@employees## with the other .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "if", "they", "ca", "n't", "do", "both", "then", "they", "deserve", "to", "fail", ".", "you", "ca", "n't", "claim", "to", "support", "free", "markets", "on", "one", "hand", "while", "literally", "handing", "the", "welfare", "applications", "to", "your", "employees", "with", "the", "other", "." ]
the poor too can set up largely selfsustaining farms and soon enough be able to afford enough automation where they do n't need laborers to do any work . even now the labor involved is mostly driving a tractor , filling seed bins and changing implements the part the tractor pulls .
cgre12h
Economics
2,014
@@the poor## too can set up largely selfsustaining farms and soon enough be able to afford enough automation where they do n't need @@laborers## to do any work . even now the labor involved is mostly driving a tractor , filling seed bins and changing implements the part the tractor pulls .
@@the poor## too can set up largely selfsustaining farms and soon enough be able to afford enough automation where they do n't need laborers to do any work . even now the labor involved is mostly driving a tractor , filling seed bins and changing implements the part the tractor pulls .
@@the poor## too can set up largely selfsustaining farms and soon enough be able to afford enough automation where they do n't need @@laborers## to do any work . even now the labor involved is mostly driving a tractor , filling seed bins and changing implements the part the tractor pulls .
[ "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "poor", "too", "can", "set", "up", "largely", "selfsustaining", "farms", "and", "soon", "enough", "be", "able", "to", "afford", "enough", "automation", "where", "they", "do", "n't", "need", "laborers", "to", "do", "any", "work", ".", "even", "now", "the", "labor", "involved", "is", "mostly", "driving", "a", "tractor", ",", "filling", "seed", "bins", "and", "changing", "implements", "the", "part", "the", "tractor", "pulls", "." ]
maybe , but the article was about a housing bubble in norway , not the bay area .
ceyjvni
Economics
2,014
maybe , but the article was about a housing bubble in norway , not the bay area .
maybe , but the article was about a housing bubble in norway , not the bay area .
maybe , but the article was about a housing bubble in norway , not the bay area .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "maybe", ",", "but", "the", "article", "was", "about", "a", "housing", "bubble", "in", "norway", ",", "not", "the", "bay", "area", "." ]
i 'll have to go back and read it again but i can tell you this , single block order '' is a contradiction .
cgilcgt
Economics
2,014
i 'll have to go back and read it again but i can tell you this , single block order '' is a contradiction .
i 'll have to go back and read it again but i can tell you this , single block order '' is a contradiction .
i 'll have to go back and read it again but i can tell you this , single block order '' is a contradiction .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'ll", "have", "to", "go", "back", "and", "read", "it", "again", "but", "i", "can", "tell", "you", "this", ",", "single", "block", "order", "``", "is", "a", "contradiction", "." ]
the issuer of the dollar does n't need to offer treasuries in the first place as the issuer is not funding constrained in the currency it issues treasuries are simply an interestpaying convenience vehicle for dollar holders alright , i see what you 're saying . instead of selling bonds , just print the money that you would spend anyway , that way you do n't have to pay interest . the problem with that is that it brings the problems inherent in money printing up immediately as opposed to somewhere in the future . the entity that receives the printed money buys goods , and then the entity that sold the goods will immediately seek out goods to buy as well . in the scenario where the second entity buys bonds , they do not immediately seek out the goods to buy , as they can buy bonds instead . and , as i 've mentioned numerous times at this point , the problems occur when the second entity seeks to buy goods . to explain what i mean in the real world . scenario 1 we offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . china buys us bonds . scenario 2 we do n't offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . china tries to buy us goods . i 'm sure you understand how the different scenarios would create different results in the economy , correct ?
cgcfzx7
Economics
2,014
the issuer of the dollar does n't need to offer treasuries in the first place as the issuer is not funding constrained in the currency it issues treasuries are simply an interestpaying convenience vehicle for dollar holders alright , i see what you 're saying . instead of selling bonds , just print the money that you would spend anyway , that way you do n't have to pay interest . the problem with that is that it brings the problems inherent in money printing up immediately as opposed to somewhere in the future . the entity that receives the printed money buys goods , and then the entity that sold the goods will immediately seek out goods to buy as well . in the scenario where the second entity buys bonds , they do not immediately seek out the goods to buy , as they can buy bonds instead . and , as i 've mentioned numerous times at this point , the problems occur when the second entity seeks to buy goods . to explain what i mean in the real world . scenario 1 we offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . @@china## buys us bonds . scenario 2 we do n't offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . @@china## tries to buy us goods . i 'm sure you understand how the different scenarios would create different results in the economy , correct ?
the issuer of the dollar does n't need to offer treasuries in the first place as the issuer is not funding constrained in the currency it issues treasuries are simply an interestpaying convenience vehicle for dollar holders alright , i see what you 're saying . instead of selling bonds , just print the money that you would spend anyway , that way you do n't have to pay interest . the problem with that is that it brings the problems inherent in money printing up immediately as opposed to somewhere in the future . the entity that receives the printed money buys goods , and then the entity that sold the goods will immediately seek out goods to buy as well . in the scenario where the second entity buys bonds , they do not immediately seek out the goods to buy , as they can buy bonds instead . and , as i 've mentioned numerous times at this point , the problems occur when the second entity seeks to buy goods . to explain what i mean in the real world . scenario 1 we offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . @@china## buys us bonds . scenario 2 we do n't offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . @@china## tries to buy us goods . i 'm sure you understand how the different scenarios would create different results in the economy , correct ?
the issuer of the dollar does n't need to offer treasuries in the first place as the issuer is not funding constrained in the currency it issues treasuries are simply an interestpaying convenience vehicle for dollar holders alright , i see what you 're saying . instead of selling bonds , just print the money that you would spend anyway , that way you do n't have to pay interest . the problem with that is that it brings the problems inherent in money printing up immediately as opposed to somewhere in the future . the entity that receives the printed money buys goods , and then the entity that sold the goods will immediately seek out goods to buy as well . in the scenario where the second entity buys bonds , they do not immediately seek out the goods to buy , as they can buy bonds instead . and , as i 've mentioned numerous times at this point , the problems occur when the second entity seeks to buy goods . to explain what i mean in the real world . scenario 1 we offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . @@china## buys us bonds . scenario 2 we do n't offer bonds for sale . we print money , distribute to our people . our people buy chinese goods . @@china## tries to buy us goods . i 'm sure you understand how the different scenarios would create different results in the economy , correct ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "issuer", "of", "the", "dollar", "does", "n't", "need", "to", "offer", "treasuries", "in", "the", "first", "place", "as", "the", "issuer", "is", "not", "funding", "constrained", "in", "the", "currency", "it", "issues", "treasuries", "are", "simply", "an", "interestpaying", "convenience", "vehicle", "for", "dollar", "holders", "alright", ",", "i", "see", "what", "you", "'re", "saying", ".", "instead", "of", "selling", "bonds", ",", "just", "print", "the", "money", "that", "you", "would", "spend", "anyway", ",", "that", "way", "you", "do", "n't", "have", "to", "pay", "interest", ".", "the", "problem", "with", "that", "is", "that", "it", "brings", "the", "problems", "inherent", "in", "money", "printing", "up", "immediately", "as", "opposed", "to", "somewhere", "in", "the", "future", ".", "the", "entity", "that", "receives", "the", "printed", "money", "buys", "goods", ",", "and", "then", "the", "entity", "that", "sold", "the", "goods", "will", "immediately", "seek", "out", "goods", "to", "buy", "as", "well", ".", "in", "the", "scenario", "where", "the", "second", "entity", "buys", "bonds", ",", "they", "do", "not", "immediately", "seek", "out", "the", "goods", "to", "buy", ",", "as", "they", "can", "buy", "bonds", "instead", ".", "and", ",", "as", "i", "'ve", "mentioned", "numerous", "times", "at", "this", "point", ",", "the", "problems", "occur", "when", "the", "second", "entity", "seeks", "to", "buy", "goods", ".", "to", "explain", "what", "i", "mean", "in", "the", "real", "world", ".", "scenario", "1", "we", "offer", "bonds", "for", "sale", ".", "we", "print", "money", ",", "distribute", "to", "our", "people", ".", "our", "people", "buy", "chinese", "goods", ".", "china", "buys", "us", "bonds", ".", "scenario", "2", "we", "do", "n't", "offer", "bonds", "for", "sale", ".", "we", "print", "money", ",", "distribute", "to", "our", "people", ".", "our", "people", "buy", "chinese", "goods", ".", "china", "tries", "to", "buy", "us", "goods", ".", "i", "'m", "sure", "you", "understand", "how", "the", "different", "scenarios", "would", "create", "different", "results", "in", "the", "economy", ",", "correct", "?" ]
but then the us would have to pay far more to service its debt .
cesk1vk
Economics
2,014
but then @@the us## would have to pay far more to service its debt .
but then @@the us## would have to pay far more to service its debt .
but then @@the us## would have to pay far more to service its debt .
[ "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "then", "the", "us", "would", "have", "to", "pay", "far", "more", "to", "service", "its", "debt", "." ]
no , they do n't have incentives to do it well . they have incentives to do it fucking horribly . because in order to be promoted within the relevant organizations , you have to be good at making good short term investments 1 to 10 years out rather than good long term investments . on top of that you are n't forced to take into account negative externalities . on top of that the players are so small that they ca n't exactly fund a project to fix our actual problems , like sprawl . that would take a huge entity , and nobody but the government comes anywhere close to being able to fix problems of that magnitude .
ceo4tv9
Economics
2,014
no , they do n't have incentives to do it well . they have incentives to do it fucking horribly . because in order to be promoted within the relevant organizations , you have to be good at making good short term investments 1 to 10 years out rather than good long term investments . on top of that you are n't forced to take into account negative externalities . on top of that the players are so small that they ca n't exactly fund a project to fix our actual problems , like sprawl . that would take a huge entity , and nobody but the government comes anywhere close to being able to fix problems of that magnitude .
no , they do n't have incentives to do it well . they have incentives to do it fucking horribly . because in order to be promoted within the relevant organizations , you have to be good at making good short term investments 1 to 10 years out rather than good long term investments . on top of that you are n't forced to take into account negative externalities . on top of that the players are so small that they ca n't exactly fund a project to fix our actual problems , like sprawl . that would take a huge entity , and nobody but the government comes anywhere close to being able to fix problems of that magnitude .
no , they do n't have incentives to do it well . they have incentives to do it fucking horribly . because in order to be promoted within the relevant organizations , you have to be good at making good short term investments 1 to 10 years out rather than good long term investments . on top of that you are n't forced to take into account negative externalities . on top of that the players are so small that they ca n't exactly fund a project to fix our actual problems , like sprawl . that would take a huge entity , and nobody but the government comes anywhere close to being able to fix problems of that magnitude .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "they", "do", "n't", "have", "incentives", "to", "do", "it", "well", ".", "they", "have", "incentives", "to", "do", "it", "fucking", "horribly", ".", "because", "in", "order", "to", "be", "promoted", "within", "the", "relevant", "organizations", ",", "you", "have", "to", "be", "good", "at", "making", "good", "short", "term", "investments", "1", "to", "10", "years", "out", "rather", "than", "good", "long", "term", "investments", ".", "on", "top", "of", "that", "you", "are", "n't", "forced", "to", "take", "into", "account", "negative", "externalities", ".", "on", "top", "of", "that", "the", "players", "are", "so", "small", "that", "they", "ca", "n't", "exactly", "fund", "a", "project", "to", "fix", "our", "actual", "problems", ",", "like", "sprawl", ".", "that", "would", "take", "a", "huge", "entity", ",", "and", "nobody", "but", "the", "government", "comes", "anywhere", "close", "to", "being", "able", "to", "fix", "problems", "of", "that", "magnitude", "." ]
krugman liberal shill . edit for those down voters . krugman admits he 's a liberal .
cf6l48a
Economics
2,014
krugman liberal shill . edit for those down voters . krugman admits he 's a liberal .
krugman liberal shill . edit for those down voters . krugman admits he 's a liberal .
krugman liberal shill . edit for those down voters . krugman admits he 's a liberal .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "krugman", "liberal", "shill", ".", "edit", "for", "those", "down", "voters", ".", "krugman", "admits", "he", "'s", "a", "liberal", "." ]
choosing one out of the dozens of articles i report is even more selective . that 's the point i was trying to make . we do get a lot of reports from you , but its very hard fro us to extract signal from noise . if you focused more on reporting articles like this one with no economics content rather than ones with economics content you disagree with , your reports would be much more valuable .
cfbygmf
Economics
2,014
choosing one out of the dozens of articles i report is even more selective . that 's the point i was trying to make . we do get a lot of reports from you , but its very hard fro us to extract signal from noise . if you focused more on reporting articles like this one with no economics content rather than ones with economics content you disagree with , your reports would be much more valuable .
choosing one out of the dozens of articles i report is even more selective . that 's the point i was trying to make . we do get a lot of reports from you , but its very hard fro us to extract signal from noise . if you focused more on reporting articles like this one with no economics content rather than ones with economics content you disagree with , your reports would be much more valuable .
choosing one out of the dozens of articles i report is even more selective . that 's the point i was trying to make . we do get a lot of reports from you , but its very hard fro us to extract signal from noise . if you focused more on reporting articles like this one with no economics content rather than ones with economics content you disagree with , your reports would be much more valuable .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "choosing", "one", "out", "of", "the", "dozens", "of", "articles", "i", "report", "is", "even", "more", "selective", ".", "that", "'s", "the", "point", "i", "was", "trying", "to", "make", ".", "we", "do", "get", "a", "lot", "of", "reports", "from", "you", ",", "but", "its", "very", "hard", "fro", "us", "to", "extract", "signal", "from", "noise", ".", "if", "you", "focused", "more", "on", "reporting", "articles", "like", "this", "one", "with", "no", "economics", "content", "rather", "than", "ones", "with", "economics", "content", "you", "disagree", "with", ",", "your", "reports", "would", "be", "much", "more", "valuable", "." ]
i 'm only talking us numbers , not world numbers .
cilhxbp
Economics
2,014
i 'm only talking us numbers , not world numbers .
i 'm only talking us numbers , not world numbers .
i 'm only talking us numbers , not world numbers .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "only", "talking", "us", "numbers", ",", "not", "world", "numbers", "." ]
hagadorn and coauthors hkmm invite the interpretation that most of the large increase in unemployment since 2007 can be blamed on the rising generosity of unemployment insurance benefits , leaving little to blame on the financial crisis . but the paper does not make that claim . and the claim is incorrect . '' URL
cep1oa7
Economics
2,014
hagadorn and coauthors hkmm invite the interpretation that most of the large increase in unemployment since 2007 can be blamed on the rising generosity of unemployment insurance benefits , leaving little to blame on the financial crisis . but the paper does not make that claim . and the claim is incorrect . '' URL
hagadorn and coauthors hkmm invite the interpretation that most of the large increase in unemployment since 2007 can be blamed on the rising generosity of unemployment insurance benefits , leaving little to blame on the financial crisis . but the paper does not make that claim . and the claim is incorrect . '' URL
hagadorn and coauthors hkmm invite the interpretation that most of the large increase in unemployment since 2007 can be blamed on the rising generosity of unemployment insurance benefits , leaving little to blame on the financial crisis . but the paper does not make that claim . and the claim is incorrect . '' URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hagadorn", "and", "coauthors", "hkmm", "invite", "the", "interpretation", "that", "most", "of", "the", "large", "increase", "in", "unemployment", "since", "2007", "can", "be", "blamed", "on", "the", "rising", "generosity", "of", "unemployment", "insurance", "benefits", ",", "leaving", "little", "to", "blame", "on", "the", "financial", "crisis", ".", "but", "the", "paper", "does", "not", "make", "that", "claim", ".", "and", "the", "claim", "is", "incorrect", ".", "``", "URL" ]
it 's a really fantastic article , and it deserves more than the tired ideologically polarized responses . here 's how i fear people will react 1. the libertarians see ? this is all proof of how heavyhanded governments enable regulatory capture . we need to eliminate and abolish the fed , market tampering , etc . etc . 2. the progressives see ? this is all proof of how evil , selfish , and psychopathic corporations are . we need to create regulations and restrictions so people have better standards of living , can make a fair wage , etc . etc . they 're both right and wrong at the same time . please let 's accept that the world is a complicated place , no ideology is a panacea , and neither zero government regulation or extreme government regulation is going to solve the problem . the real problem is much simpler people are greedy , fearful , selfish people . the dismal science indeed . no wonder i 'm always depressed .
ci8mnlk
Economics
2,014
it 's a really fantastic article , and it deserves more than the tired ideologically polarized responses . here 's how i fear people will react 1. the @@libertarians## see ? this is all proof of how heavyhanded governments enable regulatory capture . we need to eliminate and abolish the fed , market tampering , etc . etc . 2. the @@progressives## see ? this is all proof of how evil , selfish , and psychopathic corporations are . we need to create regulations and restrictions so people have better standards of living , can make a fair wage , etc . etc . they 're both right and wrong at the same time . please let 's accept that the world is a complicated place , no ideology is a panacea , and neither zero government regulation or extreme government regulation is going to solve the problem . the real problem is much simpler people are greedy , fearful , selfish people . the dismal science indeed . no wonder i 'm always depressed .
it 's a really fantastic article , and it deserves more than the tired ideologically polarized responses . here 's how i fear people will react 1. the @@libertarians## see ? this is all proof of how @@heavyhanded governments## enable regulatory capture . we need to eliminate and abolish @@the fed## , market tampering , etc . etc . 2. the progressives see ? this is all proof of how evil , selfish , and psychopathic corporations are . we need to create regulations and restrictions so people have better standards of living , can make a fair wage , etc . etc . they 're both right and wrong at the same time . please let 's accept that the world is a complicated place , no ideology is a panacea , and neither zero government regulation or extreme government regulation is going to solve the problem . the real problem is much simpler people are greedy , @@fearful , selfish people## . the dismal science indeed . no wonder i 'm always depressed .
it 's a really fantastic article , and it deserves more than the tired ideologically polarized responses . here 's how i fear people will react 1. the @@libertarians## see ? this is all proof of how @@heavyhanded governments## enable regulatory capture . we need to eliminate and abolish @@the fed## , market tampering , etc . etc . 2. the @@progressives## see ? this is all proof of how evil , selfish , and psychopathic corporations are . we need to create regulations and restrictions so people have better standards of living , can make a fair wage , etc . etc . they 're both right and wrong at the same time . please let 's accept that the world is a complicated place , no ideology is a panacea , and neither zero government regulation or extreme government regulation is going to solve the problem . the real problem is much simpler people are @@greedy , fearful , selfish people## . the dismal science indeed . no wonder i 'm always depressed .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "'s", "a", "really", "fantastic", "article", ",", "and", "it", "deserves", "more", "than", "the", "tired", "ideologically", "polarized", "responses", ".", "here", "'s", "how", "i", "fear", "people", "will", "react", "1.", "the", "libertarians", "see", "?", "this", "is", "all", "proof", "of", "how", "heavyhanded", "governments", "enable", "regulatory", "capture", ".", "we", "need", "to", "eliminate", "and", "abolish", "the", "fed", ",", "market", "tampering", ",", "etc", ".", "etc", ".", "2.", "the", "progressives", "see", "?", "this", "is", "all", "proof", "of", "how", "evil", ",", "selfish", ",", "and", "psychopathic", "corporations", "are", ".", "we", "need", "to", "create", "regulations", "and", "restrictions", "so", "people", "have", "better", "standards", "of", "living", ",", "can", "make", "a", "fair", "wage", ",", "etc", ".", "etc", ".", "they", "'re", "both", "right", "and", "wrong", "at", "the", "same", "time", ".", "please", "let", "'s", "accept", "that", "the", "world", "is", "a", "complicated", "place", ",", "no", "ideology", "is", "a", "panacea", ",", "and", "neither", "zero", "government", "regulation", "or", "extreme", "government", "regulation", "is", "going", "to", "solve", "the", "problem", ".", "the", "real", "problem", "is", "much", "simpler", "people", "are", "greedy", ",", "fearful", ",", "selfish", "people", ".", "the", "dismal", "science", "indeed", ".", "no", "wonder", "i", "'m", "always", "depressed", "." ]
actually , what you 're arguing is pretty simple show that starvation increased after qe . you can point to higher food stamp recipients , which does n't necessarily show causality , and in any case is irrelevant because food stamp recipients do n't starve . tl dr just stop posting .
clp81wb
Economics
2,014
actually , what you 're arguing is pretty simple show that starvation increased after qe . you can point to higher food stamp recipients , which does n't necessarily show causality , and in any case is irrelevant because @@food stamp recipients## do n't starve . tl dr just stop posting .
actually , what you 're arguing is pretty simple show that starvation increased after qe . you can point to higher food stamp recipients , which does n't necessarily show causality , and in any case is irrelevant because food stamp recipients do n't starve . tl dr just stop posting .
actually , what you 're arguing is pretty simple show that starvation increased after qe . you can point to higher food stamp recipients , which does n't necessarily show causality , and in any case is irrelevant because @@food stamp recipients## do n't starve . tl dr just stop posting .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "actually", ",", "what", "you", "'re", "arguing", "is", "pretty", "simple", "show", "that", "starvation", "increased", "after", "qe", ".", "you", "can", "point", "to", "higher", "food", "stamp", "recipients", ",", "which", "does", "n't", "necessarily", "show", "causality", ",", "and", "in", "any", "case", "is", "irrelevant", "because", "food", "stamp", "recipients", "do", "n't", "starve", ".", "tl", "dr", "just", "stop", "posting", "." ]
consider this sweden is the best performing economy policymakers have learned that smart macroeconomic policy does not win elections ? congratulations . your post sums up one of the reason people do n't take some economists seriously . the economy is supposed to serve the society , not the other way around . if policymakers get fired , maybe your policies are n't so smart .
ckk123f
Economics
2,014
consider this sweden is the best performing economy policymakers have learned that smart macroeconomic policy does not win elections ? congratulations . your post sums up one of the reason people do n't take some economists seriously . the economy is supposed to serve the society , not the other way around . if @@policymakers## get fired , maybe your policies are n't so smart .
consider this @@sweden## is the best performing economy policymakers have learned that smart macroeconomic policy does not win elections ? congratulations . your post sums up one of the reason people do n't take some @@economists## seriously . the economy is supposed to serve the society , not the other way around . if @@policymakers## get fired , maybe your policies are n't so smart .
consider this @@sweden## is the best performing economy policymakers have learned that smart macroeconomic policy does not win elections ? congratulations . your post sums up one of the reason people do n't take some @@economists## seriously . the economy is supposed to serve the society , not the other way around . if @@policymakers## get fired , maybe your policies are n't so smart .
[ "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "consider", "this", "sweden", "is", "the", "best", "performing", "economy", "policymakers", "have", "learned", "that", "smart", "macroeconomic", "policy", "does", "not", "win", "elections", "?", "congratulations", ".", "your", "post", "sums", "up", "one", "of", "the", "reason", "people", "do", "n't", "take", "some", "economists", "seriously", ".", "the", "economy", "is", "supposed", "to", "serve", "the", "society", ",", "not", "the", "other", "way", "around", ".", "if", "policymakers", "get", "fired", ",", "maybe", "your", "policies", "are", "n't", "so", "smart", "." ]
i 've removed this comment . personal attacks are not ok on this sub . repeat behavior is grounds for a ban .
clnqtzv
Economics
2,014
i 've removed this comment . personal attacks are not ok on this sub . repeat behavior is grounds for a ban .
i 've removed this comment . personal attacks are not ok on this sub . repeat behavior is grounds for a ban .
i 've removed this comment . personal attacks are not ok on this sub . repeat behavior is grounds for a ban .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'ve", "removed", "this", "comment", ".", "personal", "attacks", "are", "not", "ok", "on", "this", "sub", ".", "repeat", "behavior", "is", "grounds", "for", "a", "ban", "." ]
search your feelings ... you know it to be true .
ciavbrs
Economics
2,014
search your feelings ... you know it to be true .
search your feelings ... you know it to be true .
search your feelings ... you know it to be true .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "search", "your", "feelings", "...", "you", "know", "it", "to", "be", "true", "." ]
slavery was never legal in the united kingdom not including the empire . the minimum wage was introduced in the uk in 1999. slavery is not working without pay . slavery is when you are owned by another person , you are their property and they have the right to treat you how they want . there is no link between that and the minimum wage . do you have any evidence that the introduction of minimum wages did anything to reduce slavery ? as opposed to , say , laws against slavery ? or even evidence that it reduced the number of people who have to work for nothing ?
ci1hxvl
Economics
2,014
slavery was never legal in the united kingdom not including the empire . the minimum wage was introduced in the uk in 1999. slavery is not working without pay . slavery is when you are owned by another person , you are their property and they have the right to treat you how they want . there is no link between that and the minimum wage . do you have any evidence that the introduction of minimum wages did anything to reduce slavery ? as opposed to , say , laws against slavery ? or even evidence that it reduced the number of @@people who have to work for nothing## ?
slavery was never legal in @@the united kingdom## not including the empire . the minimum wage was introduced in @@the uk## in 1999. slavery is not working without pay . slavery is when you are owned by another person , you are their property and they have the right to treat you how they want . there is no link between that and the minimum wage . do you have any evidence that the introduction of minimum wages did anything to reduce slavery ? as opposed to , say , laws against slavery ? or even evidence that it reduced the number of people who have to work for nothing ?
slavery was never legal in the united kingdom not including the empire . the minimum wage was introduced in the uk in 1999. slavery is not working without pay . slavery is when you are owned by another person , you are their property and they have the right to treat you how they want . there is no link between that and the minimum wage . do you have any evidence that the introduction of minimum wages did anything to reduce slavery ? as opposed to , say , laws against slavery ? or even evidence that it reduced the number of @@people who have to work for nothing## ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0 ]
[ "slavery", "was", "never", "legal", "in", "the", "united", "kingdom", "not", "including", "the", "empire", ".", "the", "minimum", "wage", "was", "introduced", "in", "the", "uk", "in", "1999.", "slavery", "is", "not", "working", "without", "pay", ".", "slavery", "is", "when", "you", "are", "owned", "by", "another", "person", ",", "you", "are", "their", "property", "and", "they", "have", "the", "right", "to", "treat", "you", "how", "they", "want", ".", "there", "is", "no", "link", "between", "that", "and", "the", "minimum", "wage", ".", "do", "you", "have", "any", "evidence", "that", "the", "introduction", "of", "minimum", "wages", "did", "anything", "to", "reduce", "slavery", "?", "as", "opposed", "to", ",", "say", ",", "laws", "against", "slavery", "?", "or", "even", "evidence", "that", "it", "reduced", "the", "number", "of", "people", "who", "have", "to", "work", "for", "nothing", "?" ]
this is such sexist bullshit . why is it that terrible herbivore men '' are all i keep seeing posted as titles when even the damn article shows that it is not just the men causing the problem but actually even more women are doing the same thing ? is it because men are weak '' if they do n't try to hump anything that moves so they are the bad guys or because women are supposed '' to be uninterested in sex until the wedding night of course so we expect this of them ? extremely high numbers of japanese do not find sex appealing . 45 percent of women and 25 percent of men , ages 16 to 24 , are not interested in or despised sexual contact . ''
cna2uvi
Economics
2,014
this is such sexist bullshit . why is it that terrible @@herbivore men## '' are all i keep seeing posted as titles when even the damn article shows that it is not just the @@men## causing the problem but actually even more @@women## are doing the same thing ? is it because @@men## are weak '' if they do n't try to hump anything that moves so they are the bad guys or because @@women## are supposed '' to be uninterested in sex until the wedding night of course so we expect this of them ? extremely high numbers of @@japanese## do not find sex appealing . @@45 percent of women and 25 percent of men , ages 16 to 24## , are not interested in or despised sexual contact . ''
this is such sexist bullshit . why is it that @@terrible herbivore men## '' are all i keep seeing posted as titles when even the damn article shows that it is not just the @@men causing the problem## but actually even more @@women## are doing the same thing ? is it because @@men## are weak '' if they do n't try to hump anything that moves so they are the @@bad guys## or because @@women## are supposed '' to be uninterested in sex until the wedding night of course so we expect this of them ? extremely high numbers of japanese do not find sex appealing . 45 percent of @@women## and 25 percent of @@men## , ages 16 to 24 , are not interested in or despised sexual contact . ''
this is such sexist bullshit . why is it that terrible @@herbivore men## '' are all i keep seeing posted as titles when even the damn article shows that it is not just the @@men## causing the problem but actually even more @@women## are doing the same thing ? is it because @@men## are weak '' if they do n't try to hump anything that moves so they are the bad guys or because @@women## are supposed '' to be uninterested in sex until the wedding night of course so we expect this of them ? extremely high numbers of @@japanese## do not find sex appealing . @@45 percent of women and 25 percent of men , ages 16 to 24## , are not interested in or despised sexual contact . ''
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "is", "such", "sexist", "bullshit", ".", "why", "is", "it", "that", "terrible", "herbivore", "men", "``", "are", "all", "i", "keep", "seeing", "posted", "as", "titles", "when", "even", "the", "damn", "article", "shows", "that", "it", "is", "not", "just", "the", "men", "causing", "the", "problem", "but", "actually", "even", "more", "women", "are", "doing", "the", "same", "thing", "?", "is", "it", "because", "men", "are", "weak", "``", "if", "they", "do", "n't", "try", "to", "hump", "anything", "that", "moves", "so", "they", "are", "the", "bad", "guys", "or", "because", "women", "are", "supposed", "``", "to", "be", "uninterested", "in", "sex", "until", "the", "wedding", "night", "of", "course", "so", "we", "expect", "this", "of", "them", "?", "extremely", "high", "numbers", "of", "japanese", "do", "not", "find", "sex", "appealing", ".", "45", "percent", "of", "women", "and", "25", "percent", "of", "men", ",", "ages", "16", "to", "24", ",", "are", "not", "interested", "in", "or", "despised", "sexual", "contact", ".", "``" ]
most trips people take are short and bikes are great for short trips . even in the netherlands nobody bikes , except for fun , when they have to make a 20mi trip . they 'll take a car or bus instead . you 're arguing that the american lifestyle is very dependent on cars and that is very true . but as the costs of driving increase that lifestyle can and will adjust . bikes most certainly can be a part of that adjustment . people need prices so they can make economics choices . you parents choose to drive 20mi to work . that choice creates externalities in the form of pollution , traffic , and road maintenance . which is fine , i drive and lots of other people do too . however , if those externalities could be closed and they could see the costs then they might make different decisions . for example , they might move closer to work , get a closer job , get a more efficient car , or or or drive less and bike to get around on the weekends . do you see what i 'm saying ? it 's not saying everyone should bike or take a bus , it 's give people the information they need to make good choices and biking is a good choice in many common situations . nothing can replace the car when you take the family road trip but the bike can certain replace the 2mi ride to a friend 's house .
cgzv19i
Economics
2,014
most trips people take are short and bikes are great for short trips . even in the netherlands nobody bikes , except for fun , when they have to make a 20mi trip . they 'll take a car or bus instead . you 're arguing that the american lifestyle is very dependent on cars and that is very true . but as the costs of driving increase that lifestyle can and will adjust . bikes most certainly can be a part of that adjustment . people need prices so they can make economics choices . you parents choose to drive 20mi to work . that choice creates externalities in the form of pollution , traffic , and road maintenance . which is fine , i drive and lots of other people do too . however , if those externalities could be closed and they could see the costs then they might make different decisions . for example , they might move closer to work , get a closer job , get a more efficient car , or or or drive less and bike to get around on the weekends . do you see what i 'm saying ? it 's not saying everyone should bike or take a bus , it 's give people the information they need to make good choices and biking is a good choice in many common situations . nothing can replace the car when you take the family road trip but the bike can certain replace the 2mi ride to a friend 's house .
most trips people take are short and bikes are great for short trips . even in the netherlands nobody bikes , except for fun , when they have to make a 20mi trip . they 'll take a car or bus instead . you 're arguing that the american lifestyle is very dependent on cars and that is very true . but as the costs of driving increase that lifestyle can and will adjust . bikes most certainly can be a part of that adjustment . people need prices so they can make economics choices . you @@parents## choose to drive 20mi to work . that choice creates externalities in the form of pollution , traffic , and road maintenance . which is fine , i drive and lots of other people do too . however , if those externalities could be closed and they could see the costs then they might make different decisions . for example , they might move closer to work , get a closer job , get a more efficient car , or or or drive less and bike to get around on the weekends . do you see what i 'm saying ? it 's not saying everyone should bike or take a bus , it 's give people the information they need to make good choices and biking is a good choice in many common situations . nothing can replace the car when you take the family road trip but the bike can certain replace the 2mi ride to a friend 's house .
most trips people take are short and bikes are great for short trips . even in the netherlands nobody bikes , except for fun , when they have to make a 20mi trip . they 'll take a car or bus instead . you 're arguing that the american lifestyle is very dependent on cars and that is very true . but as the costs of driving increase that lifestyle can and will adjust . bikes most certainly can be a part of that adjustment . people need prices so they can make economics choices . you @@parents## choose to drive 20mi to work . that choice creates externalities in the form of pollution , traffic , and road maintenance . which is fine , i drive and lots of other people do too . however , if those externalities could be closed and they could see the costs then they might make different decisions . for example , they might move closer to work , get a closer job , get a more efficient car , or or or drive less and bike to get around on the weekends . do you see what i 'm saying ? it 's not saying everyone should bike or take a bus , it 's give people the information they need to make good choices and biking is a good choice in many common situations . nothing can replace the car when you take the family road trip but the bike can certain replace the 2mi ride to a friend 's house .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "most", "trips", "people", "take", "are", "short", "and", "bikes", "are", "great", "for", "short", "trips", ".", "even", "in", "the", "netherlands", "nobody", "bikes", ",", "except", "for", "fun", ",", "when", "they", "have", "to", "make", "a", "20mi", "trip", ".", "they", "'ll", "take", "a", "car", "or", "bus", "instead", ".", "you", "'re", "arguing", "that", "the", "american", "lifestyle", "is", "very", "dependent", "on", "cars", "and", "that", "is", "very", "true", ".", "but", "as", "the", "costs", "of", "driving", "increase", "that", "lifestyle", "can", "and", "will", "adjust", ".", "bikes", "most", "certainly", "can", "be", "a", "part", "of", "that", "adjustment", ".", "people", "need", "prices", "so", "they", "can", "make", "economics", "choices", ".", "you", "parents", "choose", "to", "drive", "20mi", "to", "work", ".", "that", "choice", "creates", "externalities", "in", "the", "form", "of", "pollution", ",", "traffic", ",", "and", "road", "maintenance", ".", "which", "is", "fine", ",", "i", "drive", "and", "lots", "of", "other", "people", "do", "too", ".", "however", ",", "if", "those", "externalities", "could", "be", "closed", "and", "they", "could", "see", "the", "costs", "then", "they", "might", "make", "different", "decisions", ".", "for", "example", ",", "they", "might", "move", "closer", "to", "work", ",", "get", "a", "closer", "job", ",", "get", "a", "more", "efficient", "car", ",", "or", "or", "or", "drive", "less", "and", "bike", "to", "get", "around", "on", "the", "weekends", ".", "do", "you", "see", "what", "i", "'m", "saying", "?", "it", "'s", "not", "saying", "everyone", "should", "bike", "or", "take", "a", "bus", ",", "it", "'s", "give", "people", "the", "information", "they", "need", "to", "make", "good", "choices", "and", "biking", "is", "a", "good", "choice", "in", "many", "common", "situations", ".", "nothing", "can", "replace", "the", "car", "when", "you", "take", "the", "family", "road", "trip", "but", "the", "bike", "can", "certain", "replace", "the", "2mi", "ride", "to", "a", "friend", "'s", "house", "." ]
because you cant just concentrate the monetary and fiscal power under the same agency . it promotes corruption and overburdens the agency with too many tasks .
cfvr7oo
Economics
2,014
because you cant just concentrate the monetary and fiscal power under the same agency . it promotes corruption and overburdens the agency with too many tasks .
because you cant just concentrate the monetary and fiscal power under the same agency . it promotes corruption and overburdens the agency with too many tasks .
because you cant just concentrate the monetary and fiscal power under the same agency . it promotes corruption and overburdens the agency with too many tasks .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "you", "cant", "just", "concentrate", "the", "monetary", "and", "fiscal", "power", "under", "the", "same", "agency", ".", "it", "promotes", "corruption", "and", "overburdens", "the", "agency", "with", "too", "many", "tasks", "." ]
non essential goods being one of the key phrases in that paragraph
clb9sxu
Economics
2,014
non essential goods being one of the key phrases in that paragraph
non essential goods being one of the key phrases in that paragraph
non essential goods being one of the key phrases in that paragraph
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "non", "essential", "goods", "being", "one", "of", "the", "key", "phrases", "in", "that", "paragraph" ]
on top of that , the previous guy is saying that his econ textbooks do talk about this sort of thing . i can confirm , since mine did too . my 1st year macro textbook mentioned that the ratio at which deposits could be loanedout was a major determinant in of m1 , m2 , and m3 , and that this ratio can be dictated by the cb . you can find more information about that by looking up the wikipedia page for reserve requirement . well that 's precisely what is being debunked , so i think it still must be a secret .
cjtqkun
Economics
2,014
on top of that , the previous guy is saying that his econ textbooks do talk about this sort of thing . i can confirm , since mine did too . my 1st year macro textbook mentioned that the ratio at which deposits could be loanedout was a major determinant in of m1 , m2 , and m3 , and that this ratio can be dictated by the cb . you can find more information about that by looking up the wikipedia page for reserve requirement . well that 's precisely what is being debunked , so i think it still must be a secret .
on top of that , the previous guy is saying that his econ textbooks do talk about this sort of thing . i can confirm , since mine did too . my 1st year macro textbook mentioned that the ratio at which deposits could be loanedout was a major determinant in of m1 , m2 , and m3 , and that this ratio can be dictated by the cb . you can find more information about that by looking up the wikipedia page for reserve requirement . well that 's precisely what is being debunked , so i think it still must be a secret .
on top of that , the previous guy is saying that his econ textbooks do talk about this sort of thing . i can confirm , since mine did too . my 1st year macro textbook mentioned that the ratio at which deposits could be loanedout was a major determinant in of m1 , m2 , and m3 , and that this ratio can be dictated by the cb . you can find more information about that by looking up the wikipedia page for reserve requirement . well that 's precisely what is being debunked , so i think it still must be a secret .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "on", "top", "of", "that", ",", "the", "previous", "guy", "is", "saying", "that", "his", "econ", "textbooks", "do", "talk", "about", "this", "sort", "of", "thing", ".", "i", "can", "confirm", ",", "since", "mine", "did", "too", ".", "my", "1st", "year", "macro", "textbook", "mentioned", "that", "the", "ratio", "at", "which", "deposits", "could", "be", "loanedout", "was", "a", "major", "determinant", "in", "of", "m1", ",", "m2", ",", "and", "m3", ",", "and", "that", "this", "ratio", "can", "be", "dictated", "by", "the", "cb", ".", "you", "can", "find", "more", "information", "about", "that", "by", "looking", "up", "the", "wikipedia", "page", "for", "reserve", "requirement", ".", "well", "that", "'s", "precisely", "what", "is", "being", "debunked", ",", "so", "i", "think", "it", "still", "must", "be", "a", "secret", "." ]
who the fuck spends 30 of their income on computers ? so the for whom '' there is probably no one . ''
ch72ds7
Economics
2,014
who the fuck spends 30 of their income on computers ? so the for whom '' there is probably no one . ''
who the fuck spends 30 of their income on computers ? so the for whom '' there is probably no one . ''
who the fuck spends 30 of their income on computers ? so the for whom '' there is probably no one . ''
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "who", "the", "fuck", "spends", "30", "of", "their", "income", "on", "computers", "?", "so", "the", "for", "whom", "``", "there", "is", "probably", "no", "one", ".", "``" ]
no , open market operations are performed when interest rates are above zero in pursuit of an interest rate target . qe or 'unconventional ' policy is performed when the interest rate is already pushed to zero by omo and the goal is to inject further liquidity by buying a broad spectrum of assets mostly mortgagebacked securities in the fed 's case without regard to the interest rate . nobody in finance confuses qe for omo . it 's a completely novel policy that has not been tried extensively before 2000. the term 'quantitative easing ' come from its intended effect of bolstering quantitative reserves .
cm6j80j
Economics
2,014
no , open market operations are performed when interest rates are above zero in pursuit of an interest rate target . qe or 'unconventional ' policy is performed when the interest rate is already pushed to zero by omo and the goal is to inject further liquidity by buying a broad spectrum of assets mostly mortgagebacked securities in @@the fed## 's case without regard to the interest rate . nobody in finance confuses qe for omo . it 's a completely novel policy that has not been tried extensively before 2000. the term 'quantitative easing ' come from its intended effect of bolstering quantitative reserves .
no , open market operations are performed when interest rates are above zero in pursuit of an interest rate target . qe or 'unconventional ' policy is performed when the interest rate is already pushed to zero by omo and the goal is to inject further liquidity by buying a broad spectrum of assets mostly mortgagebacked securities in @@the fed## 's case without regard to the interest rate . nobody in finance confuses qe for omo . it 's a completely novel policy that has not been tried extensively before 2000. the term 'quantitative easing ' come from its intended effect of bolstering quantitative reserves .
no , open market operations are performed when interest rates are above zero in pursuit of an interest rate target . qe or 'unconventional ' policy is performed when the interest rate is already pushed to zero by omo and the goal is to inject further liquidity by buying a broad spectrum of assets mostly mortgagebacked securities in @@the fed## 's case without regard to the interest rate . nobody in finance confuses qe for omo . it 's a completely novel policy that has not been tried extensively before 2000. the term 'quantitative easing ' come from its intended effect of bolstering quantitative reserves .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "open", "market", "operations", "are", "performed", "when", "interest", "rates", "are", "above", "zero", "in", "pursuit", "of", "an", "interest", "rate", "target", ".", "qe", "or", "'unconventional", "'", "policy", "is", "performed", "when", "the", "interest", "rate", "is", "already", "pushed", "to", "zero", "by", "omo", "and", "the", "goal", "is", "to", "inject", "further", "liquidity", "by", "buying", "a", "broad", "spectrum", "of", "assets", "mostly", "mortgagebacked", "securities", "in", "the", "fed", "'s", "case", "without", "regard", "to", "the", "interest", "rate", ".", "nobody", "in", "finance", "confuses", "qe", "for", "omo", ".", "it", "'s", "a", "completely", "novel", "policy", "that", "has", "not", "been", "tried", "extensively", "before", "2000.", "the", "term", "'quantitative", "easing", "'", "come", "from", "its", "intended", "effect", "of", "bolstering", "quantitative", "reserves", "." ]
actually , this article is idiotic . the inflation rate plays a role in the cost of borrowing i.e . the real interest rate . and depending on the structure of the debt , it 's possible that it can decrease its value we 've borrowed at negative interest rates before even though it 's a rarity but not enough to make it disappear maybe under hyperinflation . no academic believes that can happen it ca n't if you continue to run deficits because nominal interest rates typically move with inflation . ben bernanke never believed that . any attempt to say so is either dishonest or misinformed . in fact , ben is the one who said that the budget needs to be restructured just after running expansionary fiscal policies .
cmj2hjo
Economics
2,014
actually , this article is idiotic . the inflation rate plays a role in the cost of borrowing i.e . the real interest rate . and depending on the structure of the debt , it 's possible that it can decrease its value we 've borrowed at negative interest rates before even though it 's a rarity but not enough to make it disappear maybe under hyperinflation . no academic believes that can happen it ca n't if you continue to run deficits because nominal interest rates typically move with inflation . ben bernanke never believed that . any attempt to say so is either dishonest or misinformed . in fact , ben is the one who said that the budget needs to be restructured just after running expansionary fiscal policies .
actually , this article is idiotic . the inflation rate plays a role in the cost of borrowing i.e . the real interest rate . and depending on the structure of the debt , it 's possible that it can decrease its value we 've borrowed at negative interest rates before even though it 's a rarity but not enough to make it disappear maybe under hyperinflation . no academic believes that can happen it ca n't if you continue to run deficits because nominal interest rates typically move with inflation . ben bernanke never believed that . any attempt to say so is either dishonest or misinformed . in fact , ben is the one who said that the budget needs to be restructured just after running expansionary fiscal policies .
actually , this article is idiotic . the inflation rate plays a role in the cost of borrowing i.e . the real interest rate . and depending on the structure of the debt , it 's possible that it can decrease its value we 've borrowed at negative interest rates before even though it 's a rarity but not enough to make it disappear maybe under hyperinflation . no academic believes that can happen it ca n't if you continue to run deficits because nominal interest rates typically move with inflation . ben bernanke never believed that . any attempt to say so is either dishonest or misinformed . in fact , ben is the one who said that the budget needs to be restructured just after running expansionary fiscal policies .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "actually", ",", "this", "article", "is", "idiotic", ".", "the", "inflation", "rate", "plays", "a", "role", "in", "the", "cost", "of", "borrowing", "i.e", ".", "the", "real", "interest", "rate", ".", "and", "depending", "on", "the", "structure", "of", "the", "debt", ",", "it", "'s", "possible", "that", "it", "can", "decrease", "its", "value", "we", "'ve", "borrowed", "at", "negative", "interest", "rates", "before", "even", "though", "it", "'s", "a", "rarity", "but", "not", "enough", "to", "make", "it", "disappear", "maybe", "under", "hyperinflation", ".", "no", "academic", "believes", "that", "can", "happen", "it", "ca", "n't", "if", "you", "continue", "to", "run", "deficits", "because", "nominal", "interest", "rates", "typically", "move", "with", "inflation", ".", "ben", "bernanke", "never", "believed", "that", ".", "any", "attempt", "to", "say", "so", "is", "either", "dishonest", "or", "misinformed", ".", "in", "fact", ",", "ben", "is", "the", "one", "who", "said", "that", "the", "budget", "needs", "to", "be", "restructured", "just", "after", "running", "expansionary", "fiscal", "policies", "." ]
what a bunch of losers . go wash dishes or work at a gas station .
chnlpd1
Economics
2,014
what a bunch of losers . go wash dishes or work at a gas station .
what a bunch of @@losers## . go wash dishes or work at a gas station .
what a bunch of @@losers## . go wash dishes or work at a gas station .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "a", "bunch", "of", "losers", ".", "go", "wash", "dishes", "or", "work", "at", "a", "gas", "station", "." ]
best advice i got as a graduating senior from high school was do n't let academics get in the way of your education . maybe best advice ever .
cfdydz2
Economics
2,014
best advice i got as a graduating senior from high school was do n't let academics get in the way of your education . maybe best advice ever .
best advice i got as a graduating senior from high school was do n't let academics get in the way of your education . maybe best advice ever .
best advice i got as a graduating senior from high school was do n't let academics get in the way of your education . maybe best advice ever .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "best", "advice", "i", "got", "as", "a", "graduating", "senior", "from", "high", "school", "was", "do", "n't", "let", "academics", "get", "in", "the", "way", "of", "your", "education", ".", "maybe", "best", "advice", "ever", "." ]
mcmansions in corn fields can be explained by the lower cost of housing . it costs much more to build those same houses in a city . as someone who lives outside of a city , they do n't sell quickly and that 's indicative of low demand , even with their lower prices .
clov5c1
Economics
2,014
mcmansions in corn fields can be explained by the lower cost of housing . it costs much more to build those same houses in a city . as someone who lives outside of a city , they do n't sell quickly and that 's indicative of low demand , even with their lower prices .
mcmansions in corn fields can be explained by the lower cost of housing . it costs much more to build those same houses in a city . as someone who lives outside of a city , they do n't sell quickly and that 's indicative of low demand , even with their lower prices .
mcmansions in corn fields can be explained by the lower cost of housing . it costs much more to build those same houses in a city . as someone who lives outside of a city , they do n't sell quickly and that 's indicative of low demand , even with their lower prices .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "mcmansions", "in", "corn", "fields", "can", "be", "explained", "by", "the", "lower", "cost", "of", "housing", ".", "it", "costs", "much", "more", "to", "build", "those", "same", "houses", "in", "a", "city", ".", "as", "someone", "who", "lives", "outside", "of", "a", "city", ",", "they", "do", "n't", "sell", "quickly", "and", "that", "'s", "indicative", "of", "low", "demand", ",", "even", "with", "their", "lower", "prices", "." ]
i feel it was made really well ... it did n't choose sides , it just showed what each side represented .
ckmjehp
Economics
2,014
i feel it was made really well ... it did n't choose sides , it just showed what each side represented .
i feel it was made really well ... it did n't choose sides , it just showed what each side represented .
i feel it was made really well ... it did n't choose sides , it just showed what each side represented .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "feel", "it", "was", "made", "really", "well", "...", "it", "did", "n't", "choose", "sides", ",", "it", "just", "showed", "what", "each", "side", "represented", "." ]
depends on the suburb . look in lombard or lisle or carol stream , etc .
cw87ao5
Economics
2,015
depends on the suburb . look in lombard or lisle or carol stream , etc .
depends on the suburb . look in lombard or lisle or carol stream , etc .
depends on the suburb . look in lombard or lisle or carol stream , etc .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "depends", "on", "the", "suburb", ".", "look", "in", "lombard", "or", "lisle", "or", "carol", "stream", ",", "etc", "." ]
will soon not be paid at all . like all the poor people in the rest of the first world war . horrible .
cy7pbud
Economics
2,015
will soon not be paid at all . like all the @@poor people## in the rest of the first world war . horrible .
will soon not be paid at all . like all the @@poor people## in the rest of the first world war . horrible .
will soon not be paid at all . like all the @@poor people## in the rest of the first world war . horrible .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "will", "soon", "not", "be", "paid", "at", "all", ".", "like", "all", "the", "poor", "people", "in", "the", "rest", "of", "the", "first", "world", "war", ".", "horrible", "." ]
lol feminism making income inequality greater . checkmate democrats .
cyd96sw
Economics
2,015
lol feminism making income inequality greater . checkmate @@democrats## .
lol feminism making income inequality greater . checkmate @@democrats## .
lol feminism making income inequality greater . checkmate @@democrats## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "lol", "feminism", "making", "income", "inequality", "greater", ".", "checkmate", "democrats", "." ]
the idea of essentially contested concepts is apparently completely lost on you . there 's nothing more annoying than running into people who believe they are thinking objectively '' about normative philosophy URL or essentially contested concepts URL .
crt1ah7
Economics
2,015
the idea of essentially contested concepts is apparently completely lost on you . there 's nothing more annoying than running into @@people who believe they are thinking objectively## '' about normative philosophy URL or essentially contested concepts URL .
the idea of essentially contested concepts is apparently completely lost on you . there 's nothing more annoying than running into @@people who believe they are thinking objectively## '' about normative philosophy URL or essentially contested concepts URL .
the idea of essentially contested concepts is apparently completely lost on you . there 's nothing more annoying than running into @@people who believe they are thinking objectively## '' about normative philosophy URL or essentially contested concepts URL .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "idea", "of", "essentially", "contested", "concepts", "is", "apparently", "completely", "lost", "on", "you", ".", "there", "'s", "nothing", "more", "annoying", "than", "running", "into", "people", "who", "believe", "they", "are", "thinking", "objectively", "``", "about", "normative", "philosophy", "URL", "or", "essentially", "contested", "concepts", "URL", "." ]
deflation increases the value of money , since it will buy more tomorrow and inflation is the opposite . the country is heavily in debt so inflation is a way out , deflation is not .
cv5jaz4
Economics
2,015
deflation increases the value of money , since it will buy more tomorrow and inflation is the opposite . the country is heavily in debt so inflation is a way out , deflation is not .
deflation increases the value of money , since it will buy more tomorrow and inflation is the opposite . the country is heavily in debt so inflation is a way out , deflation is not .
deflation increases the value of money , since it will buy more tomorrow and inflation is the opposite . the country is heavily in debt so inflation is a way out , deflation is not .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "deflation", "increases", "the", "value", "of", "money", ",", "since", "it", "will", "buy", "more", "tomorrow", "and", "inflation", "is", "the", "opposite", ".", "the", "country", "is", "heavily", "in", "debt", "so", "inflation", "is", "a", "way", "out", ",", "deflation", "is", "not", "." ]
they wo n't come for artifacts at first . greece will have to privatize parts of the government , and hand them over . once privatized , it will be near impossible for a government to take back . they could privatize healthcare , make subscription mandatory . the collection agencies become shareholder . if the debt is n't fulfilled , one can then make the people overpay or reduce the cost health services provided to increase the value of shares .
co15tpj
Economics
2,015
they wo n't come for artifacts at first . @@greece## will have to privatize parts of the government , and hand them over . once privatized , it will be near impossible for a government to take back . they could privatize healthcare , make subscription mandatory . the collection agencies become shareholder . if the debt is n't fulfilled , one can then make the people overpay or reduce the cost health services provided to increase the value of shares .
they wo n't come for artifacts at first . @@greece## will have to privatize parts of the government , and hand them over . once privatized , it will be near impossible for a government to take back . they could privatize healthcare , make subscription mandatory . the collection agencies become shareholder . if the debt is n't fulfilled , one can then make the people overpay or reduce the cost health services provided to increase the value of shares .
they wo n't come for artifacts at first . @@greece## will have to privatize parts of the government , and hand them over . once privatized , it will be near impossible for a government to take back . they could privatize healthcare , make subscription mandatory . the collection agencies become shareholder . if the debt is n't fulfilled , one can then make the people overpay or reduce the cost health services provided to increase the value of shares .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "they", "wo", "n't", "come", "for", "artifacts", "at", "first", ".", "greece", "will", "have", "to", "privatize", "parts", "of", "the", "government", ",", "and", "hand", "them", "over", ".", "once", "privatized", ",", "it", "will", "be", "near", "impossible", "for", "a", "government", "to", "take", "back", ".", "they", "could", "privatize", "healthcare", ",", "make", "subscription", "mandatory", ".", "the", "collection", "agencies", "become", "shareholder", ".", "if", "the", "debt", "is", "n't", "fulfilled", ",", "one", "can", "then", "make", "the", "people", "overpay", "or", "reduce", "the", "cost", "health", "services", "provided", "to", "increase", "the", "value", "of", "shares", "." ]
if mises is going to scold people for failures in foresight socialists gave venezuela hyperinflation and did n't see it coming ! , they should own up to their own hilariously incorrect predictions of the results of trillion dollar deficits and 4 years of quantitative easing . whining about .25 interest on reserves does n't cut it .
cwaaodg
Economics
2,015
if mises is going to scold people for failures in foresight @@socialists## gave venezuela hyperinflation and did n't see it coming ! , they should own up to their own hilariously incorrect predictions of the results of trillion dollar deficits and 4 years of quantitative easing . whining about .25 interest on reserves does n't cut it .
if mises is going to scold people for failures in foresight @@socialists## gave venezuela hyperinflation and did n't see it coming ! , they should own up to their own hilariously incorrect predictions of the results of trillion dollar deficits and 4 years of quantitative easing . whining about .25 interest on reserves does n't cut it .
if mises is going to scold people for failures in foresight @@socialists## gave venezuela hyperinflation and did n't see it coming ! , they should own up to their own hilariously incorrect predictions of the results of trillion dollar deficits and 4 years of quantitative easing . whining about .25 interest on reserves does n't cut it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "if", "mises", "is", "going", "to", "scold", "people", "for", "failures", "in", "foresight", "socialists", "gave", "venezuela", "hyperinflation", "and", "did", "n't", "see", "it", "coming", "!", ",", "they", "should", "own", "up", "to", "their", "own", "hilariously", "incorrect", "predictions", "of", "the", "results", "of", "trillion", "dollar", "deficits", "and", "4", "years", "of", "quantitative", "easing", ".", "whining", "about", ".25", "interest", "on", "reserves", "does", "n't", "cut", "it", "." ]
you 're so right ! let 's all just not talk about the problem that 's wrecking the world . maybe if we ignore it for another fifty years , it 'll go away .
cnvmgkr
Economics
2,015
you 're so right ! let 's all just not talk about the problem that 's wrecking the world . maybe if we ignore it for another fifty years , it 'll go away .
you 're so right ! let 's all just not talk about the problem that 's wrecking the world . maybe if we ignore it for another fifty years , it 'll go away .
you 're so right ! let 's all just not talk about the problem that 's wrecking the world . maybe if we ignore it for another fifty years , it 'll go away .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "'re", "so", "right", "!", "let", "'s", "all", "just", "not", "talk", "about", "the", "problem", "that", "'s", "wrecking", "the", "world", ".", "maybe", "if", "we", "ignore", "it", "for", "another", "fifty", "years", ",", "it", "'ll", "go", "away", "." ]
i did n't say the port owners should get it . rather any savings gained from not using such costly labor should be passed onto the businesses that use the ports , or invested to increase productivity of the ports themselves . ultimately , these savings could be passed all the way down to the consumer lower shipping transaction costs lower prices for the consumer . i 'm all for everyone making a living wage . i personally work in bad weather , a noisy environment that barely meets osha requirements , and do plenty of physical labor . i do n't nearly make the amount of money these people do though and i do n't know anyone else that does with similar job duties . a union is what allows these employees to earn so much a union that would rather some duties be performed inefficiently on purpose so a few hundred people can have a job . economic growth does n't happen without both wage and productivity growth increasing in parallel .
coyn2nh
Economics
2,015
i did n't say the @@port owners## should get it . rather any savings gained from not using such costly labor should be passed onto the businesses that use the ports , or invested to increase productivity of the ports themselves . ultimately , these savings could be passed all the way down to the consumer lower shipping transaction costs lower prices for the consumer . i 'm all for everyone making a living wage . i personally work in bad weather , a noisy environment that barely meets osha requirements , and do plenty of physical labor . i do n't nearly make the amount of money these people do though and i do n't know anyone else that does with similar job duties . a union is what allows these @@employees## to earn so much a union that would rather some duties be performed inefficiently on purpose so a few hundred people can have a job . economic growth does n't happen without both wage and productivity growth increasing in parallel .
i did n't say the @@port owners## should get it . rather any savings gained from not using such costly labor should be passed onto the businesses that use the ports , or invested to increase productivity of the ports themselves . ultimately , these savings could be passed all the way down to the consumer lower shipping transaction costs lower prices for the consumer . i 'm all for everyone making a living wage . i personally work in bad weather , a noisy environment that barely meets osha requirements , and do plenty of physical labor . i do n't nearly make the amount of money these people do though and i do n't know anyone else that does with similar job duties . a @@union## is what allows these @@employees## to earn so much a union that would rather some duties be performed inefficiently on purpose so a few hundred people can have a job . economic growth does n't happen without both wage and productivity growth increasing in parallel .
i did n't say the @@port owners## should get it . rather any savings gained from not using such costly labor should be passed onto the businesses that use the ports , or invested to increase productivity of the ports themselves . ultimately , these savings could be passed all the way down to the consumer lower shipping transaction costs lower prices for the consumer . i 'm all for everyone making a living wage . i personally work in bad weather , a noisy environment that barely meets osha requirements , and do plenty of physical labor . i do n't nearly make the amount of money these people do though and i do n't know anyone else that does with similar job duties . a @@union## is what allows these @@employees## to earn so much a union that would rather some duties be performed inefficiently on purpose so a few hundred people can have a job . economic growth does n't happen without both wage and productivity growth increasing in parallel .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "did", "n't", "say", "the", "port", "owners", "should", "get", "it", ".", "rather", "any", "savings", "gained", "from", "not", "using", "such", "costly", "labor", "should", "be", "passed", "onto", "the", "businesses", "that", "use", "the", "ports", ",", "or", "invested", "to", "increase", "productivity", "of", "the", "ports", "themselves", ".", "ultimately", ",", "these", "savings", "could", "be", "passed", "all", "the", "way", "down", "to", "the", "consumer", "lower", "shipping", "transaction", "costs", "lower", "prices", "for", "the", "consumer", ".", "i", "'m", "all", "for", "everyone", "making", "a", "living", "wage", ".", "i", "personally", "work", "in", "bad", "weather", ",", "a", "noisy", "environment", "that", "barely", "meets", "osha", "requirements", ",", "and", "do", "plenty", "of", "physical", "labor", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "nearly", "make", "the", "amount", "of", "money", "these", "people", "do", "though", "and", "i", "do", "n't", "know", "anyone", "else", "that", "does", "with", "similar", "job", "duties", ".", "a", "union", "is", "what", "allows", "these", "employees", "to", "earn", "so", "much", "a", "union", "that", "would", "rather", "some", "duties", "be", "performed", "inefficiently", "on", "purpose", "so", "a", "few", "hundred", "people", "can", "have", "a", "job", ".", "economic", "growth", "does", "n't", "happen", "without", "both", "wage", "and", "productivity", "growth", "increasing", "in", "parallel", "." ]
what i had in mind when writing that was trying to enter a market with a new product that might objectively be called the best , but the competition is so high that you ca n't get enough market share to get your business off the ground . this happens all the time . different interpretations not withstanding , it was in no way central to my argument for the role of luck in life and business . try addressing the core subject instead of nitpicking at the periphery .
ctbq2gk
Economics
2,015
what i had in mind when writing that was trying to enter a market with a new product that might objectively be called the best , but the competition is so high that you ca n't get enough market share to get your business off the ground . this happens all the time . different interpretations not withstanding , it was in no way central to my argument for the role of luck in life and business . try addressing the core subject instead of nitpicking at the periphery .
what i had in mind when writing that was trying to enter a market with a new product that might objectively be called the best , but the competition is so high that you ca n't get enough market share to get your business off the ground . this happens all the time . different interpretations not withstanding , it was in no way central to my argument for the role of luck in life and business . try addressing the core subject instead of nitpicking at the periphery .
what i had in mind when writing that was trying to enter a market with a new product that might objectively be called the best , but the competition is so high that you ca n't get enough market share to get your business off the ground . this happens all the time . different interpretations not withstanding , it was in no way central to my argument for the role of luck in life and business . try addressing the core subject instead of nitpicking at the periphery .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "i", "had", "in", "mind", "when", "writing", "that", "was", "trying", "to", "enter", "a", "market", "with", "a", "new", "product", "that", "might", "objectively", "be", "called", "the", "best", ",", "but", "the", "competition", "is", "so", "high", "that", "you", "ca", "n't", "get", "enough", "market", "share", "to", "get", "your", "business", "off", "the", "ground", ".", "this", "happens", "all", "the", "time", ".", "different", "interpretations", "not", "withstanding", ",", "it", "was", "in", "no", "way", "central", "to", "my", "argument", "for", "the", "role", "of", "luck", "in", "life", "and", "business", ".", "try", "addressing", "the", "core", "subject", "instead", "of", "nitpicking", "at", "the", "periphery", "." ]
its supply and demand . there are no shortage of hamburger flippers . you do n't need a 3rd grade education to be taught how to flip a burger . there is a shortage of highly skilled it folk which is why they get paid higher . rather than throwing money at the problem in the form of basic income or higher minimum wages , perhaps we provide universal education where we subsidize the costs of creating a skilled workforce .
ctes6vz
Economics
2,015
its supply and demand . there are no shortage of @@hamburger flippers## . you do n't need a 3rd grade education to be taught how to flip a burger . there is a shortage of highly @@skilled it folk## which is why they get paid higher . rather than throwing money at the problem in the form of basic income or higher minimum wages , perhaps we provide universal education where we subsidize the costs of creating a @@skilled workforce## .
its supply and demand . there are no shortage of @@hamburger flippers## . you do n't need a 3rd grade education to be taught how to flip a burger . there is a shortage of @@highly skilled it folk## which is why they get paid higher . rather than throwing money at the problem in the form of basic income or higher minimum wages , perhaps we provide universal education where we subsidize the costs of creating a skilled workforce .
its supply and demand . there are no shortage of @@hamburger flippers## . you do n't need a 3rd grade education to be taught how to flip a burger . there is a shortage of @@highly skilled it folk## which is why they get paid higher . rather than throwing money at the problem in the form of basic income or higher minimum wages , perhaps we provide universal education where we subsidize the costs of creating a skilled workforce .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "its", "supply", "and", "demand", ".", "there", "are", "no", "shortage", "of", "hamburger", "flippers", ".", "you", "do", "n't", "need", "a", "3rd", "grade", "education", "to", "be", "taught", "how", "to", "flip", "a", "burger", ".", "there", "is", "a", "shortage", "of", "highly", "skilled", "it", "folk", "which", "is", "why", "they", "get", "paid", "higher", ".", "rather", "than", "throwing", "money", "at", "the", "problem", "in", "the", "form", "of", "basic", "income", "or", "higher", "minimum", "wages", ",", "perhaps", "we", "provide", "universal", "education", "where", "we", "subsidize", "the", "costs", "of", "creating", "a", "skilled", "workforce", "." ]
i 'm not sure howdo n't want to invest time in downloading the data , but of the top five on repec , stiglitz is a clear outlier URL
cvm7eh4
Economics
2,015
i 'm not sure howdo n't want to invest time in downloading the data , but of the top five on repec , stiglitz is a clear outlier URL
i 'm not sure howdo n't want to invest time in downloading the data , but of the top five on repec , stiglitz is a clear outlier URL
i 'm not sure howdo n't want to invest time in downloading the data , but of the top five on repec , stiglitz is a clear outlier URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "not", "sure", "howdo", "n't", "want", "to", "invest", "time", "in", "downloading", "the", "data", ",", "but", "of", "the", "top", "five", "on", "repec", ",", "stiglitz", "is", "a", "clear", "outlier", "URL" ]
yes . gary indiana , the average income , some 20 25 is lost to crime and property destruction .
cswj0vv
Economics
2,015
yes . gary indiana , the average income , some 20 25 is lost to crime and property destruction .
yes . gary indiana , the average income , some 20 25 is lost to crime and property destruction .
yes . gary indiana , the average income , some 20 25 is lost to crime and property destruction .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yes", ".", "gary", "indiana", ",", "the", "average", "income", ",", "some", "20", "25", "is", "lost", "to", "crime", "and", "property", "destruction", "." ]
nice argument . i guess we 're done here .
cyhae3x
Economics
2,015
nice argument . i guess we 're done here .
nice argument . i guess we 're done here .
nice argument . i guess we 're done here .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "nice", "argument", ".", "i", "guess", "we", "'re", "done", "here", "." ]
even if you magically believe that . URL still not worth it .
cu6lui2
Economics
2,015
even if you magically believe that . URL still not worth it .
even if you magically believe that . URL still not worth it .
even if you magically believe that . URL still not worth it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "even", "if", "you", "magically", "believe", "that", ".", "URL", "still", "not", "worth", "it", "." ]
automation is a good thing . increased efficiency in the long run , and people become free to pursue other careers .
cyaaaeu
Economics
2,015
automation is a good thing . increased efficiency in the long run , and people become free to pursue other careers .
automation is a good thing . increased efficiency in the long run , and people become free to pursue other careers .
automation is a good thing . increased efficiency in the long run , and people become free to pursue other careers .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "automation", "is", "a", "good", "thing", ".", "increased", "efficiency", "in", "the", "long", "run", ",", "and", "people", "become", "free", "to", "pursue", "other", "careers", "." ]
this is why property taxes are an important part of a imaginary abstraction constructed to justify violence and coercion . fixed that for you .
cndyfs0
Economics
2,015
this is why property taxes are an important part of a imaginary abstraction constructed to justify violence and coercion . fixed that for you .
this is why property taxes are an important part of a imaginary abstraction constructed to justify violence and coercion . fixed that for you .
this is why property taxes are an important part of a imaginary abstraction constructed to justify violence and coercion . fixed that for you .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "is", "why", "property", "taxes", "are", "an", "important", "part", "of", "a", "imaginary", "abstraction", "constructed", "to", "justify", "violence", "and", "coercion", ".", "fixed", "that", "for", "you", "." ]
here you go . old but worthwhile starting point . URL wikipedia graph for historical perspective URL
coopw1v
Economics
2,015
here you go . old but worthwhile starting point . URL wikipedia graph for historical perspective URL
here you go . old but worthwhile starting point . URL wikipedia graph for historical perspective URL
here you go . old but worthwhile starting point . URL wikipedia graph for historical perspective URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "here", "you", "go", ".", "old", "but", "worthwhile", "starting", "point", ".", "URL", "wikipedia", "graph", "for", "historical", "perspective", "URL" ]
trying to stimulate a dead body is what it is
cv7b2b5
Economics
2,015
trying to stimulate a dead body is what it is
trying to stimulate a dead body is what it is
trying to stimulate a dead body is what it is
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "trying", "to", "stimulate", "a", "dead", "body", "is", "what", "it", "is" ]
sweden will not run out of money , they have a positive balance of payments , source URL . the reason why greece and other southern countries ran into trouble was because they had ran negative balance of payments for too long , the longer and higher as gdp they had run it , the bigger the trouble . while sweden may indeed run into trouble one day due to housing bubble , bursting of it does n't make swedes bankrupt , what it will mean is at worst is stagnation until the swedish government starts to encourage and enable building more apartments especially to stockholm region .
cqxv1ol
Economics
2,015
sweden will not run out of money , they have a positive balance of payments , source URL . the reason why greece and other southern countries ran into trouble was because they had ran negative balance of payments for too long , the longer and higher as gdp they had run it , the bigger the trouble . while sweden may indeed run into trouble one day due to housing bubble , bursting of it does n't make swedes bankrupt , what it will mean is at worst is stagnation until the @@swedish government## starts to encourage and enable building more apartments especially to stockholm region .
@@sweden## will not run out of money , they have a positive balance of payments , source URL . the reason why @@greece## and other @@southern countries## ran into trouble was because they had ran negative balance of payments for too long , the longer and higher as gdp they had run it , the bigger the trouble . while @@sweden## may indeed run into trouble one day due to housing bubble , bursting of it does n't make @@swedes## bankrupt , what it will mean is at worst is stagnation until the @@swedish government## starts to encourage and enable building more apartments especially to stockholm region .
@@sweden## will not run out of money , they have a positive balance of payments , source URL . the reason why @@greece## and other @@southern countries## ran into trouble was because they had ran negative balance of payments for too long , the longer and higher as gdp they had run it , the bigger the trouble . while @@sweden## may indeed run into trouble one day due to housing bubble , bursting of it does n't make @@swedes## bankrupt , what it will mean is at worst is stagnation until the @@swedish government## starts to encourage and enable building more apartments especially to stockholm region .
[ "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "sweden", "will", "not", "run", "out", "of", "money", ",", "they", "have", "a", "positive", "balance", "of", "payments", ",", "source", "URL", ".", "the", "reason", "why", "greece", "and", "other", "southern", "countries", "ran", "into", "trouble", "was", "because", "they", "had", "ran", "negative", "balance", "of", "payments", "for", "too", "long", ",", "the", "longer", "and", "higher", "as", "gdp", "they", "had", "run", "it", ",", "the", "bigger", "the", "trouble", ".", "while", "sweden", "may", "indeed", "run", "into", "trouble", "one", "day", "due", "to", "housing", "bubble", ",", "bursting", "of", "it", "does", "n't", "make", "swedes", "bankrupt", ",", "what", "it", "will", "mean", "is", "at", "worst", "is", "stagnation", "until", "the", "swedish", "government", "starts", "to", "encourage", "and", "enable", "building", "more", "apartments", "especially", "to", "stockholm", "region", "." ]
no , it 's not arguably worse than 9 million people dying during the russian civil war due to starvation .
cwysqix
Economics
2,015
no , it 's not arguably worse than 9 million people dying during the russian civil war due to starvation .
no , it 's not arguably worse than 9 million people dying during the russian civil war due to starvation .
no , it 's not arguably worse than 9 million people dying during the russian civil war due to starvation .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "it", "'s", "not", "arguably", "worse", "than", "9", "million", "people", "dying", "during", "the", "russian", "civil", "war", "due", "to", "starvation", "." ]
well they could spread the risk around , turn it into a statistical cost of business instead of a risk '' . but i do n't see that helping the poor .
cxmxhav
Economics
2,015
well they could spread the risk around , turn it into a statistical cost of business instead of a risk '' . but i do n't see that helping @@the poor## .
well they could spread the risk around , turn it into a statistical cost of business instead of a risk '' . but i do n't see that helping the poor .
well they could spread the risk around , turn it into a statistical cost of business instead of a risk '' . but i do n't see that helping @@the poor## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]
[ "well", "they", "could", "spread", "the", "risk", "around", ",", "turn", "it", "into", "a", "statistical", "cost", "of", "business", "instead", "of", "a", "risk", "``", ".", "but", "i", "do", "n't", "see", "that", "helping", "the", "poor", "." ]
so , you were n't in favour of bailing out the feckless banks in 2008 , right ? which is really the point that krugman is making . there 's no pressure , either internal or external , yet , to try and push inflation upwards . in my opinion , this should either have been done at some point last year , or it should be done in two years , once the issues in china resolve themselves . it is not economically responsible to push up the federal rate now , because others want to make more profits .
cv7ygwk
Economics
2,015
so , you were n't in favour of bailing out the feckless banks in 2008 , right ? which is really the point that krugman is making . there 's no pressure , either internal or external , yet , to try and push inflation upwards . in my opinion , this should either have been done at some point last year , or it should be done in two years , once the issues in china resolve themselves . it is not economically responsible to push up the federal rate now , because others want to make more profits .
so , you were n't in favour of bailing out the feckless banks in 2008 , right ? which is really the point that krugman is making . there 's no pressure , either internal or external , yet , to try and push inflation upwards . in my opinion , this should either have been done at some point last year , or it should be done in two years , once the issues in china resolve themselves . it is not economically responsible to push up the federal rate now , because others want to make more profits .
so , you were n't in favour of bailing out the feckless banks in 2008 , right ? which is really the point that krugman is making . there 's no pressure , either internal or external , yet , to try and push inflation upwards . in my opinion , this should either have been done at some point last year , or it should be done in two years , once the issues in china resolve themselves . it is not economically responsible to push up the federal rate now , because others want to make more profits .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", ",", "you", "were", "n't", "in", "favour", "of", "bailing", "out", "the", "feckless", "banks", "in", "2008", ",", "right", "?", "which", "is", "really", "the", "point", "that", "krugman", "is", "making", ".", "there", "'s", "no", "pressure", ",", "either", "internal", "or", "external", ",", "yet", ",", "to", "try", "and", "push", "inflation", "upwards", ".", "in", "my", "opinion", ",", "this", "should", "either", "have", "been", "done", "at", "some", "point", "last", "year", ",", "or", "it", "should", "be", "done", "in", "two", "years", ",", "once", "the", "issues", "in", "china", "resolve", "themselves", ".", "it", "is", "not", "economically", "responsible", "to", "push", "up", "the", "federal", "rate", "now", ",", "because", "others", "want", "to", "make", "more", "profits", "." ]
abstract this paper examines the role of aggregatedemand stimulus in ending the great depression . plausible estimates of the effects of fiscal and monetary changes indicate that nearly all the observed recovery of the u.s. economy prior to 1942 was due to monetary expansion . a huge gold inflow in the mid and late 1930s swelled the money stock and stimulated the economy by lowering real interest rates and encouraging investment spending and purchases of durable goods . that monetary developments were crucial to the recovery implies that selfcorrection played little role in the growth of real output between 1933 and 1942. was n't the u.s. in a liquidity trap during the depression ?
cskp9c0
Economics
2,015
abstract this paper examines the role of aggregatedemand stimulus in ending the great depression . plausible estimates of the effects of fiscal and monetary changes indicate that nearly all the observed recovery of the u.s. economy prior to 1942 was due to monetary expansion . a huge gold inflow in the mid and late 1930s swelled the money stock and stimulated the economy by lowering real interest rates and encouraging investment spending and purchases of durable goods . that monetary developments were crucial to the recovery implies that selfcorrection played little role in the growth of real output between 1933 and 1942. was n't the u.s. in a liquidity trap during the depression ?
abstract this paper examines the role of aggregatedemand stimulus in ending the great depression . plausible estimates of the effects of fiscal and monetary changes indicate that nearly all the observed recovery of the u.s. economy prior to 1942 was due to monetary expansion . a huge gold inflow in the mid and late 1930s swelled the money stock and stimulated the economy by lowering real interest rates and encouraging investment spending and purchases of durable goods . that monetary developments were crucial to the recovery implies that selfcorrection played little role in the growth of real output between 1933 and 1942. was n't @@the u.s.## in a liquidity trap during the depression ?
abstract this paper examines the role of aggregatedemand stimulus in ending the great depression . plausible estimates of the effects of fiscal and monetary changes indicate that nearly all the observed recovery of the u.s. economy prior to 1942 was due to monetary expansion . a huge gold inflow in the mid and late 1930s swelled the money stock and stimulated the economy by lowering real interest rates and encouraging investment spending and purchases of durable goods . that monetary developments were crucial to the recovery implies that selfcorrection played little role in the growth of real output between 1933 and 1942. was n't @@the u.s.## in a liquidity trap during the depression ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "abstract", "this", "paper", "examines", "the", "role", "of", "aggregatedemand", "stimulus", "in", "ending", "the", "great", "depression", ".", "plausible", "estimates", "of", "the", "effects", "of", "fiscal", "and", "monetary", "changes", "indicate", "that", "nearly", "all", "the", "observed", "recovery", "of", "the", "u.s.", "economy", "prior", "to", "1942", "was", "due", "to", "monetary", "expansion", ".", "a", "huge", "gold", "inflow", "in", "the", "mid", "and", "late", "1930s", "swelled", "the", "money", "stock", "and", "stimulated", "the", "economy", "by", "lowering", "real", "interest", "rates", "and", "encouraging", "investment", "spending", "and", "purchases", "of", "durable", "goods", ".", "that", "monetary", "developments", "were", "crucial", "to", "the", "recovery", "implies", "that", "selfcorrection", "played", "little", "role", "in", "the", "growth", "of", "real", "output", "between", "1933", "and", "1942.", "was", "n't", "the", "u.s.", "in", "a", "liquidity", "trap", "during", "the", "depression", "?" ]
we 're going from repetitive labour to a laboratory . something tells me that you 've never worked in a lab before .
cunlo1j
Economics
2,015
we 're going from repetitive labour to a laboratory . something tells me that you 've never worked in a lab before .
we 're going from repetitive labour to a laboratory . something tells me that you 've never worked in a lab before .
we 're going from repetitive labour to a laboratory . something tells me that you 've never worked in a lab before .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "we", "'re", "going", "from", "repetitive", "labour", "to", "a", "laboratory", ".", "something", "tells", "me", "that", "you", "'ve", "never", "worked", "in", "a", "lab", "before", "." ]
in the uk , 70 of transactions are exempt from the tax . there are similar exemptions in singapore and hong kong neither of which i would characterize as major exchanges hong kong 's monthly volume is about 10 that of volume in the u.s. , and the singapore exchange does n't even show up in the top 20 .
cvree2z
Economics
2,015
in the uk , 70 of transactions are exempt from the tax . there are similar exemptions in singapore and hong kong neither of which i would characterize as major exchanges hong kong 's monthly volume is about 10 that of volume in the u.s. , and the singapore exchange does n't even show up in the top 20 .
in the uk , 70 of transactions are exempt from the tax . there are similar exemptions in singapore and hong kong neither of which i would characterize as major exchanges @@hong kong 's## monthly volume is about 10 that of volume in the u.s. , and the singapore exchange does n't even show up in the top 20 .
in the uk , 70 of transactions are exempt from the tax . there are similar exemptions in singapore and hong kong neither of which i would characterize as major exchanges hong kong 's monthly volume is about 10 that of volume in the u.s. , and the singapore exchange does n't even show up in the top 20 .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "in", "the", "uk", ",", "70", "of", "transactions", "are", "exempt", "from", "the", "tax", ".", "there", "are", "similar", "exemptions", "in", "singapore", "and", "hong", "kong", "neither", "of", "which", "i", "would", "characterize", "as", "major", "exchanges", "hong", "kong", "'s", "monthly", "volume", "is", "about", "10", "that", "of", "volume", "in", "the", "u.s.", ",", "and", "the", "singapore", "exchange", "does", "n't", "even", "show", "up", "in", "the", "top", "20", "." ]
i do n't pay taxes in boston or seattle . telling me that i should watch the game because they received tax money is just as idiotic as telling me that i should drink their tap water .
co6hllr
Economics
2,015
i do n't pay taxes in boston or seattle . telling me that i should watch the game because they received tax money is just as idiotic as telling me that i should drink their tap water .
i do n't pay taxes in boston or seattle . telling me that i should watch the game because they received tax money is just as idiotic as telling me that i should drink their tap water .
i do n't pay taxes in boston or seattle . telling me that i should watch the game because they received tax money is just as idiotic as telling me that i should drink their tap water .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "do", "n't", "pay", "taxes", "in", "boston", "or", "seattle", ".", "telling", "me", "that", "i", "should", "watch", "the", "game", "because", "they", "received", "tax", "money", "is", "just", "as", "idiotic", "as", "telling", "me", "that", "i", "should", "drink", "their", "tap", "water", "." ]
that is ... the most ridiculous thing i have ever read in my life . you do n't know how cornering a market is an advantage ? monopolies ? economies of scale ? ability to influence other nations ? are you insane ?
cposr60
Economics
2,015
that is ... the most ridiculous thing i have ever read in my life . you do n't know how cornering a market is an advantage ? monopolies ? economies of scale ? ability to influence other nations ? are you insane ?
that is ... the most ridiculous thing i have ever read in my life . you do n't know how cornering a market is an advantage ? monopolies ? economies of scale ? ability to influence other nations ? are you insane ?
that is ... the most ridiculous thing i have ever read in my life . you do n't know how cornering a market is an advantage ? monopolies ? economies of scale ? ability to influence other nations ? are you insane ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "is", "...", "the", "most", "ridiculous", "thing", "i", "have", "ever", "read", "in", "my", "life", ".", "you", "do", "n't", "know", "how", "cornering", "a", "market", "is", "an", "advantage", "?", "monopolies", "?", "economies", "of", "scale", "?", "ability", "to", "influence", "other", "nations", "?", "are", "you", "insane", "?" ]
fama worked delong into a state of allcaps agitation on twitter URL wtf ? ! ? ! ? ! the fed prints the money ! no ambiguity about who is taking whom for walkies . m b 101 have to agree . zero ambiguity ... some dogs get more leash and others are allowed to roam the yard does n't mean there 's ambiguity about who the master is . bad dogs get brought to heel and mad dogs get put down . you ca n't fight the fed on rates .
cvbve3n
Economics
2,015
fama worked delong into a state of allcaps agitation on twitter URL wtf ? ! ? ! ? ! @@the fed## prints the money ! no ambiguity about who is taking whom for walkies . m b 101 have to agree . zero ambiguity ... some dogs get more leash and others are allowed to roam the yard does n't mean there 's ambiguity about who the master is . bad dogs get brought to heel and mad dogs get put down . you ca n't fight the fed on rates .
fama worked delong into a state of allcaps agitation on twitter URL wtf ? ! ? ! ? ! @@the fed## prints the money ! no ambiguity about who is taking whom for walkies . m b 101 have to agree . zero ambiguity ... some dogs get more leash and others are allowed to roam the yard does n't mean there 's ambiguity about who the master is . bad dogs get brought to heel and mad dogs get put down . you ca n't fight the fed on rates .
fama worked delong into a state of allcaps agitation on twitter URL wtf ? ! ? ! ? ! @@the fed## prints the money ! no ambiguity about who is taking whom for walkies . m b 101 have to agree . zero ambiguity ... some dogs get more leash and others are allowed to roam the yard does n't mean there 's ambiguity about who the master is . bad dogs get brought to heel and mad dogs get put down . you ca n't fight the fed on rates .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "fama", "worked", "delong", "into", "a", "state", "of", "allcaps", "agitation", "on", "twitter", "URL", "wtf", "?", "!", "?", "!", "?", "!", "the", "fed", "prints", "the", "money", "!", "no", "ambiguity", "about", "who", "is", "taking", "whom", "for", "walkies", ".", "m", "b", "101", "have", "to", "agree", ".", "zero", "ambiguity", "...", "some", "dogs", "get", "more", "leash", "and", "others", "are", "allowed", "to", "roam", "the", "yard", "does", "n't", "mean", "there", "'s", "ambiguity", "about", "who", "the", "master", "is", ".", "bad", "dogs", "get", "brought", "to", "heel", "and", "mad", "dogs", "get", "put", "down", ".", "you", "ca", "n't", "fight", "the", "fed", "on", "rates", "." ]
the tip is not required . if you do n't pay a tip , the server will still make at least minimum wage . the law simply states that servers must report tip income , and that restaurant owners can pay subminimum wage if the server reports tips . in the end , this results in higher employment and better service .
co9iyfi
Economics
2,015
the tip is not required . if you do n't pay a tip , the server will still make at least minimum wage . the law simply states that @@servers## must report tip income , and that @@restaurant owners## can pay subminimum wage if the server reports tips . in the end , this results in higher employment and better service .
the tip is not required . if you do n't pay a tip , the server will still make at least minimum wage . the law simply states that @@servers## must report tip income , and that @@restaurant owners## can pay subminimum wage if the server reports tips . in the end , this results in higher employment and better service .
the tip is not required . if you do n't pay a tip , the server will still make at least minimum wage . the law simply states that @@servers## must report tip income , and that @@restaurant owners## can pay subminimum wage if the server reports tips . in the end , this results in higher employment and better service .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "tip", "is", "not", "required", ".", "if", "you", "do", "n't", "pay", "a", "tip", ",", "the", "server", "will", "still", "make", "at", "least", "minimum", "wage", ".", "the", "law", "simply", "states", "that", "servers", "must", "report", "tip", "income", ",", "and", "that", "restaurant", "owners", "can", "pay", "subminimum", "wage", "if", "the", "server", "reports", "tips", ".", "in", "the", "end", ",", "this", "results", "in", "higher", "employment", "and", "better", "service", "." ]
prosperity is a function of many things . and culture is definitely one , you make a good point . i guess i was still thinking about slow migration rather than just opening the floodgates .
cr5ez5v
Economics
2,015
prosperity is a function of many things . and culture is definitely one , you make a good point . i guess i was still thinking about slow migration rather than just opening the floodgates .
prosperity is a function of many things . and culture is definitely one , you make a good point . i guess i was still thinking about slow migration rather than just opening the floodgates .
prosperity is a function of many things . and culture is definitely one , you make a good point . i guess i was still thinking about slow migration rather than just opening the floodgates .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "prosperity", "is", "a", "function", "of", "many", "things", ".", "and", "culture", "is", "definitely", "one", ",", "you", "make", "a", "good", "point", ".", "i", "guess", "i", "was", "still", "thinking", "about", "slow", "migration", "rather", "than", "just", "opening", "the", "floodgates", "." ]
we did it north of the 49th a little while ago and i for one have n't looked back . it feels like nostalgia is the only reason we have n't done the same with dimes ...
crpuxfz
Economics
2,015
we did it north of the 49th a little while ago and i for one have n't looked back . it feels like nostalgia is the only reason we have n't done the same with dimes ...
we did it north of the 49th a little while ago and i for one have n't looked back . it feels like nostalgia is the only reason we have n't done the same with dimes ...
we did it north of the 49th a little while ago and i for one have n't looked back . it feels like nostalgia is the only reason we have n't done the same with dimes ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "we", "did", "it", "north", "of", "the", "49th", "a", "little", "while", "ago", "and", "i", "for", "one", "have", "n't", "looked", "back", ".", "it", "feels", "like", "nostalgia", "is", "the", "only", "reason", "we", "have", "n't", "done", "the", "same", "with", "dimes", "..." ]
sounds like colored coins '' for those who are aware . it uses bitcoin addresses to stand for certificates of asset ownership , much like stocks are to shares of a company
cukopbf
Economics
2,015
sounds like colored coins '' for those who are aware . it uses bitcoin addresses to stand for certificates of asset ownership , much like stocks are to shares of a company
sounds like colored coins '' for those who are aware . it uses bitcoin addresses to stand for certificates of asset ownership , much like stocks are to shares of a company
sounds like colored coins '' for those who are aware . it uses bitcoin addresses to stand for certificates of asset ownership , much like stocks are to shares of a company
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "sounds", "like", "colored", "coins", "``", "for", "those", "who", "are", "aware", ".", "it", "uses", "bitcoin", "addresses", "to", "stand", "for", "certificates", "of", "asset", "ownership", ",", "much", "like", "stocks", "are", "to", "shares", "of", "a", "company" ]
once again , the only source of effective leverage here is my car loan , not margin from my broker , a levered etf , or anything like that . if you like , my whole car portfolio was 25k the car was 14,5 otd i paid for the car with a loan for 10,5 and 4k in cash . car portfolio is now 21k in a mix of vti , vea , vwo , eemv , usmv , mub , bnd , bndx , lqd , and vwob . edit the allocation to angl is actually not in my car portfolio . i was saying that 21k in investments plus a 10.5k car loan is 21 leverage , which is why i took the equities portion down from 70 to 40 . when you said what are you , 60 ? '' i linked to the bit on risk parity as a very general inspiration for the idea of levering an otherwise conservative allocation . again , not sure what part of this is difficult for you to understand . i never claimed to be using leverage beyond the car loan .
cu35kmy
Economics
2,015
once again , the only source of effective leverage here is my car loan , not margin from my broker , a levered etf , or anything like that . if you like , my whole car portfolio was 25k the car was 14,5 otd i paid for the car with a loan for 10,5 and 4k in cash . car portfolio is now 21k in a mix of vti , vea , vwo , eemv , usmv , mub , bnd , bndx , lqd , and vwob . edit the allocation to angl is actually not in my car portfolio . i was saying that 21k in investments plus a 10.5k car loan is 21 leverage , which is why i took the equities portion down from 70 to 40 . when you said what are you , 60 ? '' i linked to the bit on risk parity as a very general inspiration for the idea of levering an otherwise conservative allocation . again , not sure what part of this is difficult for you to understand . i never claimed to be using leverage beyond the car loan .
once again , the only source of effective leverage here is my car loan , not margin from my broker , a levered etf , or anything like that . if you like , my whole car portfolio was 25k the car was 14,5 otd i paid for the car with a loan for 10,5 and 4k in cash . car portfolio is now 21k in a mix of vti , vea , vwo , eemv , usmv , mub , bnd , bndx , lqd , and vwob . edit the allocation to angl is actually not in my car portfolio . i was saying that 21k in investments plus a 10.5k car loan is 21 leverage , which is why i took the equities portion down from 70 to 40 . when you said what are you , 60 ? '' i linked to the bit on risk parity as a very general inspiration for the idea of levering an otherwise conservative allocation . again , not sure what part of this is difficult for you to understand . i never claimed to be using leverage beyond the car loan .
once again , the only source of effective leverage here is my car loan , not margin from my broker , a levered etf , or anything like that . if you like , my whole car portfolio was 25k the car was 14,5 otd i paid for the car with a loan for 10,5 and 4k in cash . car portfolio is now 21k in a mix of vti , vea , vwo , eemv , usmv , mub , bnd , bndx , lqd , and vwob . edit the allocation to angl is actually not in my car portfolio . i was saying that 21k in investments plus a 10.5k car loan is 21 leverage , which is why i took the equities portion down from 70 to 40 . when you said what are you , 60 ? '' i linked to the bit on risk parity as a very general inspiration for the idea of levering an otherwise conservative allocation . again , not sure what part of this is difficult for you to understand . i never claimed to be using leverage beyond the car loan .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "once", "again", ",", "the", "only", "source", "of", "effective", "leverage", "here", "is", "my", "car", "loan", ",", "not", "margin", "from", "my", "broker", ",", "a", "levered", "etf", ",", "or", "anything", "like", "that", ".", "if", "you", "like", ",", "my", "whole", "car", "portfolio", "was", "25k", "the", "car", "was", "14,5", "otd", "i", "paid", "for", "the", "car", "with", "a", "loan", "for", "10,5", "and", "4k", "in", "cash", ".", "car", "portfolio", "is", "now", "21k", "in", "a", "mix", "of", "vti", ",", "vea", ",", "vwo", ",", "eemv", ",", "usmv", ",", "mub", ",", "bnd", ",", "bndx", ",", "lqd", ",", "and", "vwob", ".", "edit", "the", "allocation", "to", "angl", "is", "actually", "not", "in", "my", "car", "portfolio", ".", "i", "was", "saying", "that", "21k", "in", "investments", "plus", "a", "10.5k", "car", "loan", "is", "21", "leverage", ",", "which", "is", "why", "i", "took", "the", "equities", "portion", "down", "from", "70", "to", "40", ".", "when", "you", "said", "what", "are", "you", ",", "60", "?", "``", "i", "linked", "to", "the", "bit", "on", "risk", "parity", "as", "a", "very", "general", "inspiration", "for", "the", "idea", "of", "levering", "an", "otherwise", "conservative", "allocation", ".", "again", ",", "not", "sure", "what", "part", "of", "this", "is", "difficult", "for", "you", "to", "understand", ".", "i", "never", "claimed", "to", "be", "using", "leverage", "beyond", "the", "car", "loan", "." ]
for real , these poeple also need to put food on the table .
d8p7la0
Economics
2,016
for real , these poeple also need to put food on the table .
for real , these poeple also need to put food on the table .
for real , these poeple also need to put food on the table .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "for", "real", ",", "these", "poeple", "also", "need", "to", "put", "food", "on", "the", "table", "." ]
you 're kidding me right ? do you understand purchasing parity between two countries ? it has little to do with regulations and more to do with the exchange rates , economic structures , etc .
d8tke1n
Economics
2,016
you 're kidding me right ? do you understand purchasing parity between two countries ? it has little to do with regulations and more to do with the exchange rates , economic structures , etc .
you 're kidding me right ? do you understand purchasing parity between two countries ? it has little to do with regulations and more to do with the exchange rates , economic structures , etc .
you 're kidding me right ? do you understand purchasing parity between two countries ? it has little to do with regulations and more to do with the exchange rates , economic structures , etc .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "'re", "kidding", "me", "right", "?", "do", "you", "understand", "purchasing", "parity", "between", "two", "countries", "?", "it", "has", "little", "to", "do", "with", "regulations", "and", "more", "to", "do", "with", "the", "exchange", "rates", ",", "economic", "structures", ",", "etc", "." ]
would n't it put downward pressure on wages ?
cyod7vy
Economics
2,016
would n't it put downward pressure on wages ?
would n't it put downward pressure on wages ?
would n't it put downward pressure on wages ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "would", "n't", "it", "put", "downward", "pressure", "on", "wages", "?" ]
isps , foodstuffs , entertainment , technology , ... take your pick .
d5s9g9l
Economics
2,016
isps , foodstuffs , entertainment , technology , ... take your pick .
isps , foodstuffs , entertainment , technology , ... take your pick .
isps , foodstuffs , entertainment , technology , ... take your pick .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "isps", ",", "foodstuffs", ",", "entertainment", ",", "technology", ",", "...", "take", "your", "pick", "." ]
a better analogy would be a homeopath . even if they believe in their stuff , it does n't make it more true . but just like homeopathy , if it works for you because of placebo effect , maybe it 's not so bad after all .
daoc1hr
Economics
2,016
a better analogy would be a homeopath . even if they believe in their stuff , it does n't make it more true . but just like homeopathy , if it works for you because of placebo effect , maybe it 's not so bad after all .
a better analogy would be a homeopath . even if they believe in their stuff , it does n't make it more true . but just like homeopathy , if it works for you because of placebo effect , maybe it 's not so bad after all .
a better analogy would be a homeopath . even if they believe in their stuff , it does n't make it more true . but just like homeopathy , if it works for you because of placebo effect , maybe it 's not so bad after all .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "a", "better", "analogy", "would", "be", "a", "homeopath", ".", "even", "if", "they", "believe", "in", "their", "stuff", ",", "it", "does", "n't", "make", "it", "more", "true", ".", "but", "just", "like", "homeopathy", ",", "if", "it", "works", "for", "you", "because", "of", "placebo", "effect", ",", "maybe", "it", "'s", "not", "so", "bad", "after", "all", "." ]
steve can go to community college and get retrained . saratu in nigeria ca n't .
dbdlqqn
Economics
2,016
steve can go to community college and get retrained . saratu in nigeria ca n't .
steve can go to community college and get retrained . saratu in nigeria ca n't .
steve can go to community college and get retrained . saratu in nigeria ca n't .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "steve", "can", "go", "to", "community", "college", "and", "get", "retrained", ".", "saratu", "in", "nigeria", "ca", "n't", "." ]
not really interested in changing the subject . i really am curious to know if there is any sort of evidence that the speed of money being spent will only decrease when there are no items to buy because the underlying implications is that velocity of money is not affected by tax rates , prudential regulation , lending rules , et cetera . which just seems farfetched frankly .
d3xrhra
Economics
2,016
not really interested in changing the subject . i really am curious to know if there is any sort of evidence that the speed of money being spent will only decrease when there are no items to buy because the underlying implications is that velocity of money is not affected by tax rates , prudential regulation , lending rules , et cetera . which just seems farfetched frankly .
not really interested in changing the subject . i really am curious to know if there is any sort of evidence that the speed of money being spent will only decrease when there are no items to buy because the underlying implications is that velocity of money is not affected by tax rates , prudential regulation , lending rules , et cetera . which just seems farfetched frankly .
not really interested in changing the subject . i really am curious to know if there is any sort of evidence that the speed of money being spent will only decrease when there are no items to buy because the underlying implications is that velocity of money is not affected by tax rates , prudential regulation , lending rules , et cetera . which just seems farfetched frankly .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "really", "interested", "in", "changing", "the", "subject", ".", "i", "really", "am", "curious", "to", "know", "if", "there", "is", "any", "sort", "of", "evidence", "that", "the", "speed", "of", "money", "being", "spent", "will", "only", "decrease", "when", "there", "are", "no", "items", "to", "buy", "because", "the", "underlying", "implications", "is", "that", "velocity", "of", "money", "is", "not", "affected", "by", "tax", "rates", ",", "prudential", "regulation", ",", "lending", "rules", ",", "et", "cetera", ".", "which", "just", "seems", "farfetched", "frankly", "." ]
are you a troll ? ethanol policies have been terrible . it does n't help the environment , it 's just extra rent for rent seeking farmers . we need a carbon tax . edit after a moment of thought , this seems like obvious trolling . i overlooked their first comment . 810 trolling , i have been genuinely entertained .
cyyej8x
Economics
2,016
are you a troll ? ethanol policies have been terrible . it does n't help the environment , it 's just extra rent for @@rent seeking farmers## . we need a carbon tax . edit after a moment of thought , this seems like obvious trolling . i overlooked their first comment . 810 trolling , i have been genuinely entertained .
are you a troll ? ethanol policies have been terrible . it does n't help the environment , it 's just extra rent for @@rent seeking farmers## . we need a carbon tax . edit after a moment of thought , this seems like obvious trolling . i overlooked their first comment . 810 trolling , i have been genuinely entertained .
are you a troll ? ethanol policies have been terrible . it does n't help the environment , it 's just extra rent for @@rent seeking farmers## . we need a carbon tax . edit after a moment of thought , this seems like obvious trolling . i overlooked their first comment . 810 trolling , i have been genuinely entertained .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "are", "you", "a", "troll", "?", "ethanol", "policies", "have", "been", "terrible", ".", "it", "does", "n't", "help", "the", "environment", ",", "it", "'s", "just", "extra", "rent", "for", "rent", "seeking", "farmers", ".", "we", "need", "a", "carbon", "tax", ".", "edit", "after", "a", "moment", "of", "thought", ",", "this", "seems", "like", "obvious", "trolling", ".", "i", "overlooked", "their", "first", "comment", ".", "810", "trolling", ",", "i", "have", "been", "genuinely", "entertained", "." ]
the sensational deal at t ! a good signal for investors or a forecast by cramer ? longterm expectations or loss of dividends ?
d96re2x
Economics
2,016
the sensational deal at t ! a good signal for @@investors## or a forecast by cramer ? longterm expectations or loss of dividends ?
the sensational deal at t ! a good signal for investors or a forecast by cramer ? longterm expectations or loss of dividends ?
the sensational deal at t ! a good signal for @@investors## or a forecast by cramer ? longterm expectations or loss of dividends ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "sensational", "deal", "at", "t", "!", "a", "good", "signal", "for", "investors", "or", "a", "forecast", "by", "cramer", "?", "longterm", "expectations", "or", "loss", "of", "dividends", "?" ]
i think it was manitoba that started paying the homless to pickup garbage . its a start .
czpiw6j
Economics
2,016
i think it was manitoba that started paying @@the homless## to pickup garbage . its a start .
i think it was manitoba that started paying @@the homless## to pickup garbage . its a start .
i think it was manitoba that started paying @@the homless## to pickup garbage . its a start .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "think", "it", "was", "manitoba", "that", "started", "paying", "the", "homless", "to", "pickup", "garbage", ".", "its", "a", "start", "." ]
i 've seen other topics here address the need for monetary reform ? ? why should a topic about the singular proof of monetary solution be banned from being posted here ? ?
d63kqrv
Economics
2,016
i 've seen other topics here address the need for monetary reform ? ? why should a topic about the singular proof of monetary solution be banned from being posted here ? ?
i 've seen other topics here address the need for monetary reform ? ? why should a topic about the singular proof of monetary solution be banned from being posted here ? ?
i 've seen other topics here address the need for monetary reform ? ? why should a topic about the singular proof of monetary solution be banned from being posted here ? ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'ve", "seen", "other", "topics", "here", "address", "the", "need", "for", "monetary", "reform", "?", "?", "why", "should", "a", "topic", "about", "the", "singular", "proof", "of", "monetary", "solution", "be", "banned", "from", "being", "posted", "here", "?", "?" ]
turkey cycles do emerge from poor market information , but not all recessions come from them . see the link that i provided the european depression after 1814 resulted from the end of an age of conflict , and the need to repurpose the war machine . the 1870 agricultural depression resulted from food imports . very often the proximal trigger lies in financial markets 1929 , say but the structural issues are wider in this case , german war reparations , trade protectionism and the impact of new energy and manufacturing technologies .
czow5lg
Economics
2,016
turkey cycles do emerge from poor market information , but not all recessions come from them . see the link that i provided the european depression after 1814 resulted from the end of an age of conflict , and the need to repurpose the war machine . the 1870 agricultural depression resulted from food imports . very often the proximal trigger lies in financial markets 1929 , say but the structural issues are wider in this case , german war reparations , trade protectionism and the impact of new energy and manufacturing technologies .
turkey cycles do emerge from poor market information , but not all recessions come from them . see the link that i provided the european depression after 1814 resulted from the end of an age of conflict , and the need to repurpose the war machine . the 1870 agricultural depression resulted from food imports . very often the proximal trigger lies in financial markets 1929 , say but the structural issues are wider in this case , german war reparations , trade protectionism and the impact of new energy and manufacturing technologies .
turkey cycles do emerge from poor market information , but not all recessions come from them . see the link that i provided the european depression after 1814 resulted from the end of an age of conflict , and the need to repurpose the war machine . the 1870 agricultural depression resulted from food imports . very often the proximal trigger lies in financial markets 1929 , say but the structural issues are wider in this case , german war reparations , trade protectionism and the impact of new energy and manufacturing technologies .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "turkey", "cycles", "do", "emerge", "from", "poor", "market", "information", ",", "but", "not", "all", "recessions", "come", "from", "them", ".", "see", "the", "link", "that", "i", "provided", "the", "european", "depression", "after", "1814", "resulted", "from", "the", "end", "of", "an", "age", "of", "conflict", ",", "and", "the", "need", "to", "repurpose", "the", "war", "machine", ".", "the", "1870", "agricultural", "depression", "resulted", "from", "food", "imports", ".", "very", "often", "the", "proximal", "trigger", "lies", "in", "financial", "markets", "1929", ",", "say", "but", "the", "structural", "issues", "are", "wider", "in", "this", "case", ",", "german", "war", "reparations", ",", "trade", "protectionism", "and", "the", "impact", "of", "new", "energy", "and", "manufacturing", "technologies", "." ]
the data in figure one is all encompassing and shows numbers by years . so what exactly is the problem ?
dbhtj12
Economics
2,016
the data in figure one is all encompassing and shows numbers by years . so what exactly is the problem ?
the data in figure one is all encompassing and shows numbers by years . so what exactly is the problem ?
the data in figure one is all encompassing and shows numbers by years . so what exactly is the problem ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "data", "in", "figure", "one", "is", "all", "encompassing", "and", "shows", "numbers", "by", "years", ".", "so", "what", "exactly", "is", "the", "problem", "?" ]
agreed . i have no issues whatsoever with your response . complete and perfectly competitive markets are likely very rare . my assertion that barriers to competition are counterproductive was to be taken literally , and it is fair to say that while productivity is mostly everything , it 's not everything , to paraphrase krugman . i certainly would n't want to operate in a completely unregulated economy . i think degree and types of regulation regularly fall into normative territory , and at that point each persons riskURL comfort level becomes relevant .
d8te9lu
Economics
2,016
agreed . i have no issues whatsoever with your response . complete and perfectly competitive markets are likely very rare . my assertion that barriers to competition are counterproductive was to be taken literally , and it is fair to say that while productivity is mostly everything , it 's not everything , to paraphrase krugman . i certainly would n't want to operate in a completely unregulated economy . i think degree and types of regulation regularly fall into normative territory , and at that point each persons riskURL comfort level becomes relevant .
agreed . i have no issues whatsoever with your response . complete and perfectly competitive markets are likely very rare . my assertion that barriers to competition are counterproductive was to be taken literally , and it is fair to say that while productivity is mostly everything , it 's not everything , to paraphrase krugman . i certainly would n't want to operate in a completely unregulated economy . i think degree and types of regulation regularly fall into normative territory , and at that point each persons riskURL comfort level becomes relevant .
agreed . i have no issues whatsoever with your response . complete and perfectly competitive markets are likely very rare . my assertion that barriers to competition are counterproductive was to be taken literally , and it is fair to say that while productivity is mostly everything , it 's not everything , to paraphrase krugman . i certainly would n't want to operate in a completely unregulated economy . i think degree and types of regulation regularly fall into normative territory , and at that point each persons riskURL comfort level becomes relevant .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "agreed", ".", "i", "have", "no", "issues", "whatsoever", "with", "your", "response", ".", "complete", "and", "perfectly", "competitive", "markets", "are", "likely", "very", "rare", ".", "my", "assertion", "that", "barriers", "to", "competition", "are", "counterproductive", "was", "to", "be", "taken", "literally", ",", "and", "it", "is", "fair", "to", "say", "that", "while", "productivity", "is", "mostly", "everything", ",", "it", "'s", "not", "everything", ",", "to", "paraphrase", "krugman", ".", "i", "certainly", "would", "n't", "want", "to", "operate", "in", "a", "completely", "unregulated", "economy", ".", "i", "think", "degree", "and", "types", "of", "regulation", "regularly", "fall", "into", "normative", "territory", ",", "and", "at", "that", "point", "each", "persons", "riskURL", "comfort", "level", "becomes", "relevant", "." ]
actually , bill clinton led one of the most prosperous economic periods in recent history . obama brought back the economy from a recession . they , in fact , were not the same people who advised bush who had his own republican advisers . the other two relied on the advice from this council . i think your critique is an oversimplified kneejerk reaction . you can not just levy the many confounding factors that led to the recession on the democrat cea without even mentioning that republican guy in the middle . at the end of the day , these guys know what they 're doing , or the usa would be doing way worse than it is . stop buying into the horror stories he 's selling you . america is okay . if gerald friedman has all of these colleagues , find me them . find real , legitimate economists with serious policy analysis to rival the list i 've compiled . you wo n't find them . at some point , you have to accept that the world is n't out to get bernie . he 's just wrong , and his one supporting economist is a member of the democratic socialists of america with heavy bias . and if you want a better policy , to demand them from me is highschool level debate . oh , bernie 's wrong ? well do something better then you idiot . '' i hear your high pitched voice now . look to the current successes of obamacare . that 's what you do for health . and stop switching the subject to general economicfiscal policy positions regarding the us economy . the discussion , as i 've emphasized for the third time here , is about his terrible health care promises .
d04a6sl
Economics
2,016
actually , bill clinton led one of the most prosperous economic periods in recent history . obama brought back the economy from a recession . they , in fact , were not the same people who advised bush who had his own @@republican advisers## . the other two relied on the advice from this council . i think your critique is an oversimplified kneejerk reaction . you can not just levy the many confounding factors that led to the recession on the @@democrat cea## without even mentioning that republican guy in the middle . at the end of the day , these guys know what they 're doing , or the usa would be doing way worse than it is . stop buying into the horror stories he 's selling you . america is okay . if gerald friedman has all of these colleagues , find me them . find real , legitimate @@economists## with serious policy analysis to rival the list i 've compiled . you wo n't find them . at some point , you have to accept that the world is n't out to get bernie . he 's just wrong , and his one supporting economist is a member of the @@democratic socialists of america## with heavy bias . and if you want a better policy , to demand them from me is highschool level debate . oh , bernie 's wrong ? well do something better then you idiot . '' i hear your high pitched voice now . look to the current successes of obamacare . that 's what you do for health . and stop switching the subject to general economicfiscal policy positions regarding the us economy . the discussion , as i 've emphasized for the third time here , is about his terrible health care promises .
actually , bill clinton led one of the most prosperous economic periods in recent history . obama brought back the economy from a recession . they , in fact , were not the same people who advised bush who had his own republican advisers . the other two relied on the advice from this council . i think your critique is an oversimplified kneejerk reaction . you can not just levy the many confounding factors that led to the recession on the democrat cea without even mentioning that republican guy in the middle . at the end of the day , these guys know what they 're doing , or @@the usa## would be doing way worse than it is . stop buying into the horror stories he 's selling you . @@america## is okay . if gerald friedman has all of these colleagues , find me them . find real , legitimate economists with serious policy analysis to rival the list i 've compiled . you wo n't find them . at some point , you have to accept that the world is n't out to get bernie . he 's just wrong , and his one supporting economist is a member of the democratic socialists of america with heavy bias . and if you want a better policy , to demand them from me is highschool level debate . oh , bernie 's wrong ? well do something better then you idiot . '' i hear your high pitched voice now . look to the current successes of obamacare . that 's what you do for health . and stop switching the subject to general economicfiscal policy positions regarding the us economy . the discussion , as i 've emphasized for the third time here , is about his terrible health care promises .
actually , bill clinton led one of the most prosperous economic periods in recent history . obama brought back the economy from a recession . they , in fact , were not the same people who advised bush who had his own @@republican advisers## . the other two relied on the advice from this council . i think your critique is an oversimplified kneejerk reaction . you can not just levy the many confounding factors that led to the recession on the @@democrat cea## without even mentioning that republican guy in the middle . at the end of the day , these guys know what they 're doing , or the usa would be doing way worse than it is . stop buying into the horror stories he 's selling you . america is okay . if gerald friedman has all of these colleagues , find me them . find real , legitimate @@economists## with serious policy analysis to rival the list i 've compiled . you wo n't find them . at some point , you have to accept that the world is n't out to get bernie . he 's just wrong , and his one supporting economist is a member of the @@democratic socialists of america## with heavy bias . and if you want a better policy , to demand them from me is highschool level debate . oh , bernie 's wrong ? well do something better then you idiot . '' i hear your high pitched voice now . look to the current successes of obamacare . that 's what you do for health . and stop switching the subject to general economicfiscal policy positions regarding the us economy . the discussion , as i 've emphasized for the third time here , is about his terrible health care promises .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "actually", ",", "bill", "clinton", "led", "one", "of", "the", "most", "prosperous", "economic", "periods", "in", "recent", "history", ".", "obama", "brought", "back", "the", "economy", "from", "a", "recession", ".", "they", ",", "in", "fact", ",", "were", "not", "the", "same", "people", "who", "advised", "bush", "who", "had", "his", "own", "republican", "advisers", ".", "the", "other", "two", "relied", "on", "the", "advice", "from", "this", "council", ".", "i", "think", "your", "critique", "is", "an", "oversimplified", "kneejerk", "reaction", ".", "you", "can", "not", "just", "levy", "the", "many", "confounding", "factors", "that", "led", "to", "the", "recession", "on", "the", "democrat", "cea", "without", "even", "mentioning", "that", "republican", "guy", "in", "the", "middle", ".", "at", "the", "end", "of", "the", "day", ",", "these", "guys", "know", "what", "they", "'re", "doing", ",", "or", "the", "usa", "would", "be", "doing", "way", "worse", "than", "it", "is", ".", "stop", "buying", "into", "the", "horror", "stories", "he", "'s", "selling", "you", ".", "america", "is", "okay", ".", "if", "gerald", "friedman", "has", "all", "of", "these", "colleagues", ",", "find", "me", "them", ".", "find", "real", ",", "legitimate", "economists", "with", "serious", "policy", "analysis", "to", "rival", "the", "list", "i", "'ve", "compiled", ".", "you", "wo", "n't", "find", "them", ".", "at", "some", "point", ",", "you", "have", "to", "accept", "that", "the", "world", "is", "n't", "out", "to", "get", "bernie", ".", "he", "'s", "just", "wrong", ",", "and", "his", "one", "supporting", "economist", "is", "a", "member", "of", "the", "democratic", "socialists", "of", "america", "with", "heavy", "bias", ".", "and", "if", "you", "want", "a", "better", "policy", ",", "to", "demand", "them", "from", "me", "is", "highschool", "level", "debate", ".", "oh", ",", "bernie", "'s", "wrong", "?", "well", "do", "something", "better", "then", "you", "idiot", ".", "``", "i", "hear", "your", "high", "pitched", "voice", "now", ".", "look", "to", "the", "current", "successes", "of", "obamacare", ".", "that", "'s", "what", "you", "do", "for", "health", ".", "and", "stop", "switching", "the", "subject", "to", "general", "economicfiscal", "policy", "positions", "regarding", "the", "us", "economy", ".", "the", "discussion", ",", "as", "i", "'ve", "emphasized", "for", "the", "third", "time", "here", ",", "is", "about", "his", "terrible", "health", "care", "promises", "." ]
a 40,000 speech is a lot less puzzling when you think of it like a concert . if an event organizer sells out a 6,000seat auditorium , a 10 ticket should more than cover the costs . yeah , its not really that puzzling if you think that its not really that much money to put on an event of this size .
d7stziw
Economics
2,016
a 40,000 speech is a lot less puzzling when you think of it like a concert . if an event organizer sells out a 6,000seat auditorium , a 10 ticket should more than cover the costs . yeah , its not really that puzzling if you think that its not really that much money to put on an event of this size .
a 40,000 speech is a lot less puzzling when you think of it like a concert . if an event organizer sells out a 6,000seat auditorium , a 10 ticket should more than cover the costs . yeah , its not really that puzzling if you think that its not really that much money to put on an event of this size .
a 40,000 speech is a lot less puzzling when you think of it like a concert . if an event organizer sells out a 6,000seat auditorium , a 10 ticket should more than cover the costs . yeah , its not really that puzzling if you think that its not really that much money to put on an event of this size .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "a", "40,000", "speech", "is", "a", "lot", "less", "puzzling", "when", "you", "think", "of", "it", "like", "a", "concert", ".", "if", "an", "event", "organizer", "sells", "out", "a", "6,000seat", "auditorium", ",", "a", "10", "ticket", "should", "more", "than", "cover", "the", "costs", ".", "yeah", ",", "its", "not", "really", "that", "puzzling", "if", "you", "think", "that", "its", "not", "really", "that", "much", "money", "to", "put", "on", "an", "event", "of", "this", "size", "." ]
oh , no , sorry . i 'm asking about trickle down .
da7zmbl
Economics
2,016
oh , no , sorry . i 'm asking about trickle down .
oh , no , sorry . i 'm asking about trickle down .
oh , no , sorry . i 'm asking about trickle down .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "oh", ",", "no", ",", "sorry", ".", "i", "'m", "asking", "about", "trickle", "down", "." ]
best quote of the whole article the big banks might have 1 to 6 of exposure . that 's not going to kill them . this is not like 2006 or 2007 , '' i think wells fargo has almost 2 trillion dollars in assets , at that size and with its geographic footprint , the commercial loan portfolio is evenly distributed amongst all of the industries in the economy . i would worry more about the small and medium sized banks in texas or oklahoma where they might have a 20 energy exposure . chances are a lot of the production companies will be in trouble , and the midstream pipeline companies will struggle a little . banking might see a couple of casualties , but there will be dozens if not hundreds of casualties in the energy industry unless the price of crude bounces back .
czcamyt
Economics
2,016
best quote of the whole article the big banks might have 1 to 6 of exposure . that 's not going to kill them . this is not like 2006 or 2007 , '' i think wells fargo has almost 2 trillion dollars in assets , at that size and with its geographic footprint , the commercial loan portfolio is evenly distributed amongst all of the industries in the economy . i would worry more about the small and medium sized banks in texas or oklahoma where they might have a 20 energy exposure . chances are a lot of the production companies will be in trouble , and the midstream pipeline companies will struggle a little . banking might see a couple of casualties , but there will be dozens if not hundreds of casualties in the energy industry unless the price of crude bounces back .
best quote of the whole article @@the big banks## might have 1 to 6 of exposure . that 's not going to kill them . this is not like 2006 or 2007 , '' i think @@wells fargo## has almost 2 trillion dollars in assets , at that size and with its geographic footprint , the commercial loan portfolio is evenly distributed amongst all of the industries in the economy . i would worry more about the @@small and medium sized banks in texas or oklahoma## where they might have a 20 energy exposure . chances are a lot of the @@production companies## will be in trouble , and the @@midstream pipeline companies## will struggle a little . banking might see a couple of casualties , but there will be dozens if not hundreds of casualties in the energy industry unless the price of crude bounces back .
best quote of the whole article the big banks might have 1 to 6 of exposure . that 's not going to kill them . this is not like 2006 or 2007 , '' i think wells fargo has almost 2 trillion dollars in assets , at that size and with its geographic footprint , the commercial loan portfolio is evenly distributed amongst all of the industries in the economy . i would worry more about the small and medium sized banks in texas or oklahoma where they might have a 20 energy exposure . chances are a lot of the production companies will be in trouble , and the midstream pipeline companies will struggle a little . banking might see a couple of casualties , but there will be dozens if not hundreds of casualties in the energy industry unless the price of crude bounces back .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "best", "quote", "of", "the", "whole", "article", "the", "big", "banks", "might", "have", "1", "to", "6", "of", "exposure", ".", "that", "'s", "not", "going", "to", "kill", "them", ".", "this", "is", "not", "like", "2006", "or", "2007", ",", "``", "i", "think", "wells", "fargo", "has", "almost", "2", "trillion", "dollars", "in", "assets", ",", "at", "that", "size", "and", "with", "its", "geographic", "footprint", ",", "the", "commercial", "loan", "portfolio", "is", "evenly", "distributed", "amongst", "all", "of", "the", "industries", "in", "the", "economy", ".", "i", "would", "worry", "more", "about", "the", "small", "and", "medium", "sized", "banks", "in", "texas", "or", "oklahoma", "where", "they", "might", "have", "a", "20", "energy", "exposure", ".", "chances", "are", "a", "lot", "of", "the", "production", "companies", "will", "be", "in", "trouble", ",", "and", "the", "midstream", "pipeline", "companies", "will", "struggle", "a", "little", ".", "banking", "might", "see", "a", "couple", "of", "casualties", ",", "but", "there", "will", "be", "dozens", "if", "not", "hundreds", "of", "casualties", "in", "the", "energy", "industry", "unless", "the", "price", "of", "crude", "bounces", "back", "." ]
the legal , economic and political systems have failed us . what other alternatives are their ?
d0ywoug
Economics
2,016
the legal , economic and political systems have failed us . what other alternatives are their ?
the legal , economic and political systems have failed us . what other alternatives are their ?
the legal , economic and political systems have failed us . what other alternatives are their ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "legal", ",", "economic", "and", "political", "systems", "have", "failed", "us", ".", "what", "other", "alternatives", "are", "their", "?" ]
so unless the people who own the building can milk the renters for all they are worth they will not put up new apartments ? that 's some warped logic i must say .
d3d4gkj
Economics
2,016
so unless the @@people who own the building## can milk the @@renters## for all they are worth they will not put up new apartments ? that 's some warped logic i must say .
so unless the @@people who own the building## can milk the @@renters## for all they are worth they will not put up new apartments ? that 's some warped logic i must say .
so unless the @@people who own the building## can milk the @@renters## for all they are worth they will not put up new apartments ? that 's some warped logic i must say .
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "so", "unless", "the", "people", "who", "own", "the", "building", "can", "milk", "the", "renters", "for", "all", "they", "are", "worth", "they", "will", "not", "put", "up", "new", "apartments", "?", "that", "'s", "some", "warped", "logic", "i", "must", "say", "." ]
an 80 corrolation is enough of a difference over time that you will find differences in the population . you should n't confuse height , a concrete and easily measurable characteristic , with the more nebulous traits you are assuming have a significant genetic component .
d95o9v9
Economics
2,016
an 80 corrolation is enough of a difference over time that you will find differences in the population . you should n't confuse height , a concrete and easily measurable characteristic , with the more nebulous traits you are assuming have a significant genetic component .
an 80 corrolation is enough of a difference over time that you will find differences in the population . you should n't confuse height , a concrete and easily measurable characteristic , with the more nebulous traits you are assuming have a significant genetic component .
an 80 corrolation is enough of a difference over time that you will find differences in the population . you should n't confuse height , a concrete and easily measurable characteristic , with the more nebulous traits you are assuming have a significant genetic component .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "an", "80", "corrolation", "is", "enough", "of", "a", "difference", "over", "time", "that", "you", "will", "find", "differences", "in", "the", "population", ".", "you", "should", "n't", "confuse", "height", ",", "a", "concrete", "and", "easily", "measurable", "characteristic", ",", "with", "the", "more", "nebulous", "traits", "you", "are", "assuming", "have", "a", "significant", "genetic", "component", "." ]
my anecdotal localized experience is that i 've noticed a handful of restaurants have recently raised their prices one has raised just about every entree 1 , rents are going up , house prices are going up , but there do n't seem to be many job opportunities , especially those paying 50,000 . these factors do n't seem to add up .
d0sqrx1
Economics
2,016
my anecdotal localized experience is that i 've noticed a handful of restaurants have recently raised their prices one has raised just about every entree 1 , rents are going up , house prices are going up , but there do n't seem to be many job opportunities , especially those paying 50,000 . these factors do n't seem to add up .
my anecdotal localized experience is that i 've noticed a handful of @@restaurants## have recently raised their prices one has raised just about every entree 1 , rents are going up , house prices are going up , but there do n't seem to be many job opportunities , especially those paying 50,000 . these factors do n't seem to add up .
my anecdotal localized experience is that i 've noticed a handful of restaurants have recently raised their prices one has raised just about every entree 1 , rents are going up , house prices are going up , but there do n't seem to be many job opportunities , especially those paying 50,000 . these factors do n't seem to add up .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "my", "anecdotal", "localized", "experience", "is", "that", "i", "'ve", "noticed", "a", "handful", "of", "restaurants", "have", "recently", "raised", "their", "prices", "one", "has", "raised", "just", "about", "every", "entree", "1", ",", "rents", "are", "going", "up", ",", "house", "prices", "are", "going", "up", ",", "but", "there", "do", "n't", "seem", "to", "be", "many", "job", "opportunities", ",", "especially", "those", "paying", "50,000", ".", "these", "factors", "do", "n't", "seem", "to", "add", "up", "." ]
people are n't making the choices you want them to that you feel is optimal ? ? ? if there 's a hurricane risk and the state needs to move thousands of people along a storm front out of harms way , suggesting that the money could have been spent more efficiently by increasing eitc does not logically follow . well , you were stupid for living in the path of a storm , so i do n't see why the federal government should give you special treatment . it 's just inefficient ! '' neither makes sense nor addresses the very localized impact and subsequent particular needs of people living in the path of a hurricane . people need to take responsibility one great way to give people the opportunity to take responsibility is to provide them with options to improve their circumstances . giving addicts access to health clinics and offering children quality food to eat and providing shelters for the homeless to live in allow these individuals to take responsibility for themselves . eitc does n't offer anyone who does n't have a job this opportunity .
d3c4ajt
Economics
2,016
people are n't making the choices you want them to that you feel is optimal ? ? ? if there 's a hurricane risk and the state needs to move thousands of people along a storm front out of harms way , suggesting that the money could have been spent more efficiently by increasing eitc does not logically follow . well , you were stupid for living in the path of a storm , so i do n't see why the @@federal government## should give you special treatment . it 's just inefficient ! '' neither makes sense nor addresses the very localized impact and subsequent particular needs of people living in the path of a hurricane . people need to take responsibility one great way to give people the opportunity to take responsibility is to provide them with options to improve their circumstances . giving @@addicts## access to health clinics and offering @@children## quality food to eat and providing shelters for @@the homeless## to live in allow these individuals to take responsibility for themselves . eitc does n't offer anyone who does n't have a job this opportunity .
people are n't making the choices you want them to that you feel is optimal ? ? ? if there 's a hurricane risk and the state needs to move thousands of people along a storm front out of harms way , suggesting that the money could have been spent more efficiently by increasing eitc does not logically follow . well , you were stupid for living in the path of a storm , so i do n't see why the federal government should give you special treatment . it 's just inefficient ! '' neither makes sense nor addresses the very localized impact and subsequent particular needs of people living in the path of a hurricane . people need to take responsibility one great way to give people the opportunity to take responsibility is to provide them with options to improve their circumstances . giving addicts access to health clinics and offering @@children## quality food to eat and providing shelters for @@the homeless## to live in allow these individuals to take responsibility for themselves . eitc does n't offer @@anyone who does n't have a job## this opportunity .
people are n't making the choices you want them to that you feel is optimal ? ? ? if there 's a hurricane risk and the state needs to move thousands of people along a storm front out of harms way , suggesting that the money could have been spent more efficiently by increasing eitc does not logically follow . well , you were stupid for living in the path of a storm , so i do n't see why the @@federal government## should give you special treatment . it 's just inefficient ! '' neither makes sense nor addresses the very localized impact and subsequent particular needs of people living in the path of a hurricane . people need to take responsibility one great way to give people the opportunity to take responsibility is to provide them with options to improve their circumstances . giving @@addicts## access to health clinics and offering @@children## quality food to eat and providing shelters for @@the homeless## to live in allow these individuals to take responsibility for themselves . eitc does n't offer @@anyone who does n't have a job## this opportunity .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "people", "are", "n't", "making", "the", "choices", "you", "want", "them", "to", "that", "you", "feel", "is", "optimal", "?", "?", "?", "if", "there", "'s", "a", "hurricane", "risk", "and", "the", "state", "needs", "to", "move", "thousands", "of", "people", "along", "a", "storm", "front", "out", "of", "harms", "way", ",", "suggesting", "that", "the", "money", "could", "have", "been", "spent", "more", "efficiently", "by", "increasing", "eitc", "does", "not", "logically", "follow", ".", "well", ",", "you", "were", "stupid", "for", "living", "in", "the", "path", "of", "a", "storm", ",", "so", "i", "do", "n't", "see", "why", "the", "federal", "government", "should", "give", "you", "special", "treatment", ".", "it", "'s", "just", "inefficient", "!", "``", "neither", "makes", "sense", "nor", "addresses", "the", "very", "localized", "impact", "and", "subsequent", "particular", "needs", "of", "people", "living", "in", "the", "path", "of", "a", "hurricane", ".", "people", "need", "to", "take", "responsibility", "one", "great", "way", "to", "give", "people", "the", "opportunity", "to", "take", "responsibility", "is", "to", "provide", "them", "with", "options", "to", "improve", "their", "circumstances", ".", "giving", "addicts", "access", "to", "health", "clinics", "and", "offering", "children", "quality", "food", "to", "eat", "and", "providing", "shelters", "for", "the", "homeless", "to", "live", "in", "allow", "these", "individuals", "to", "take", "responsibility", "for", "themselves", ".", "eitc", "does", "n't", "offer", "anyone", "who", "does", "n't", "have", "a", "job", "this", "opportunity", "." ]
of course the money comes from oil . they 're putting it toward nonoil investment though .
d1mfrxt
Economics
2,016
of course the money comes from oil . they 're putting it toward nonoil investment though .
of course the money comes from oil . they 're putting it toward nonoil investment though .
of course the money comes from oil . they 're putting it toward nonoil investment though .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "of", "course", "the", "money", "comes", "from", "oil", ".", "they", "'re", "putting", "it", "toward", "nonoil", "investment", "though", "." ]
the economic machine is a complicated beast . i really do n't think the deregulation of the derivatives markets had much to do with the crisis , because it likely would have happened anyway . it 's of course more satisfying to think there was one thing that led to the crash , but that 's seldom the case .
d68i63f
Economics
2,016
the economic machine is a complicated beast . i really do n't think the deregulation of the derivatives markets had much to do with the crisis , because it likely would have happened anyway . it 's of course more satisfying to think there was one thing that led to the crash , but that 's seldom the case .
the economic machine is a complicated beast . i really do n't think the deregulation of the derivatives markets had much to do with the crisis , because it likely would have happened anyway . it 's of course more satisfying to think there was one thing that led to the crash , but that 's seldom the case .
the economic machine is a complicated beast . i really do n't think the deregulation of the derivatives markets had much to do with the crisis , because it likely would have happened anyway . it 's of course more satisfying to think there was one thing that led to the crash , but that 's seldom the case .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "economic", "machine", "is", "a", "complicated", "beast", ".", "i", "really", "do", "n't", "think", "the", "deregulation", "of", "the", "derivatives", "markets", "had", "much", "to", "do", "with", "the", "crisis", ",", "because", "it", "likely", "would", "have", "happened", "anyway", ".", "it", "'s", "of", "course", "more", "satisfying", "to", "think", "there", "was", "one", "thing", "that", "led", "to", "the", "crash", ",", "but", "that", "'s", "seldom", "the", "case", "." ]
those who benefit from the system do n't usually complain about it , nice observation
d2j7zqu
Economics
2,016
@@those who benefit from the system## do n't usually complain about it , nice observation
those who benefit from the system do n't usually complain about it , nice observation
@@those who benefit from the system## do n't usually complain about it , nice observation
[ "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "those", "who", "benefit", "from", "the", "system", "do", "n't", "usually", "complain", "about", "it", ",", "nice", "observation" ]
well , again , as the previous commenter said , even that is subjective . as you mentioned yourself , some people are very happy with their art history degree . then again , it 's only in some countries that people pay that high a sum , other european countries do n't .
d8606wl
Economics
2,016
well , again , as the previous commenter said , even that is subjective . as you mentioned yourself , some people are very happy with their art history degree . then again , it 's only in some countries that people pay that high a sum , other european countries do n't .
well , again , as the previous commenter said , even that is subjective . as you mentioned yourself , some people are very happy with their art history degree . then again , it 's only in some countries that people pay that high a sum , other @@european countries## do n't .
well , again , as the previous commenter said , even that is subjective . as you mentioned yourself , some people are very happy with their art history degree . then again , it 's only in some countries that people pay that high a sum , other @@european countries## do n't .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "well", ",", "again", ",", "as", "the", "previous", "commenter", "said", ",", "even", "that", "is", "subjective", ".", "as", "you", "mentioned", "yourself", ",", "some", "people", "are", "very", "happy", "with", "their", "art", "history", "degree", ".", "then", "again", ",", "it", "'s", "only", "in", "some", "countries", "that", "people", "pay", "that", "high", "a", "sum", ",", "other", "european", "countries", "do", "n't", "." ]
world of difference between an nit and a ubi . the incentives between the two are wildly different .
d83buri
Economics
2,016
world of difference between an nit and a ubi . the incentives between the two are wildly different .
world of difference between an nit and a ubi . the incentives between the two are wildly different .
world of difference between an nit and a ubi . the incentives between the two are wildly different .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "world", "of", "difference", "between", "an", "nit", "and", "a", "ubi", ".", "the", "incentives", "between", "the", "two", "are", "wildly", "different", "." ]
1718 is not a major '' export market ? ok then .
da29dc0
Economics
2,016
1718 is not a major '' export market ? ok then .
1718 is not a major '' export market ? ok then .
1718 is not a major '' export market ? ok then .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "1718", "is", "not", "a", "major", "``", "export", "market", "?", "ok", "then", "." ]