Datasets:

GleghornLab

/

abstract_domain_copd

like 0

Whether inhaled medications improve long‐term survival in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an open question.,The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of adherence to inhaled drug use on 5‐year survival in COPD.,A population‐based cohort study in three Italian regions was conducted using healthcare linked datasets (hospitalization, mortality, drugs).,Individuals (45+ years) discharged after COPD exacerbation in 2006-2009 were enrolled.,Inhaled drug daily use during 5‐year follow‐up was determined through Proportion of Days Covered on the basis of Defined Daily Doses.,Five levels of time‐dependent exposure were identified: (i) long‐acting β2 agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (LB/ICS) regular use; (ii) LB/ICS occasional use; (iii) LB regular use; (iv) LB occasional use; and (v) respiratory drugs other than LB.,Cox regression models adjusted for baseline (socio‐demographic, comorbidities, drug use) and time‐dependent characteristics (COPD exacerbations, cardiovascular hospitalizations, cardiovascular therapy) were performed.,A total of 12 124 individuals were studied, 46% women, mean age 73,8 years.,Average follow‐up time 2,4 year.,A total of 3415 subjects died (mortality rate = 11.9 per 100 person years).,In comparison to LB/ICS regular use, higher risks of death for all remaining treatments were found, the highest risk for respiratory drugs other than LB category (HR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.43-1.87).,Patients with regular LB use had higher survival than those with LB/ICS occasional use (HR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.79-0.99).,These findings support clinical guidelines and recommendations for the regular use of inhaled drugs to improve health status and prognosis among moderate-severe COPD patients.,© 2016 The Authors.,Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Randomized interventional trials generally recruit highly selected patients.,In contrast, long-term, noninterventional studies can reflect standard of care of real-life populations.,DACCORD (Die ambulante Versorgung mit langwirksamen Bronchodilatatoren: COPD-Register in Deutschland [Outpatient Care With Long-Acting Bronchodilators: COPD Registry in Germany]) is an ongoing observational study, conducted in primary and secondary care in Germany, aiming to describe the impact of disease and treatments on real-life patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Patients had a clinical and spirometry diagnosis of COPD, were aged ≥40 years, and were initiating or changing COPD maintenance medication.,The only exclusion criteria were asthma and participation in a randomized clinical trial.,Exacerbation data were collected every 3 months.,COPD medication, COPD Assessment Test, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were recorded at the end of the 1 year period.,In the 6 months prior to baseline, 26.5% of the 3,974 patients experienced ≥1 exacerbation, compared with 26.1% over the 1-year follow-up (annualized rate 0.384).,Importantly, only previous exacerbations and not poor lung function alone predicted an increased exacerbation risk.,There was a general shift to lower disease severity from baseline to 1 year, predominantly as a consequence of a lower proportion of patients considered at high risk due to exacerbations.,COPD Assessment Test mean change from baseline was −1.9, with 48.9% of patients reporting a clinically relevant improvement.,Overall persistence to medication was high, with 77.2% of patients still receiving the same class of medication at 1 year.,DACCORD suggests that in clinical practice, the large majority of COPD patients are symptomatic but seldom exacerbate and that widely used tools and treatment recommendations do not reflect this fully.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is more common in patients with COPD than in the adult general population, with studies of hospitalized CAP patients consistently reporting COPD as a frequent comorbidity.,However, despite an increasing recognition of its importance, large studies evaluating the incidence patterns over time, risk factors and burden of CAP in COPD are currently lacking.,A retrospective observational study using a large UK-based database of linked primary and secondary care records was conducted.,Patients with a diagnosis of COPD aged ≥40 years were followed up for 5 years from January 1, 2010.,CAP and exacerbation episodes were identified from hospital discharge data and primary care coding records, and rates were calculated per month, adjusting for mortality, and displayed over time.,In addition, baseline factors predicting future risk of CAP and hospital admission with CAP were identified.,A total of 14,513 COPD patients were identified: 13.4% (n=1,938) had ≥1 CAP episode, of whom 18.8% suffered from recurrent (≥2) CAP.,Highest rates of both CAP and exacerbations were seen in winter.,A greater proportion of frequent, compared to infrequent, exacerbators experienced recurrent CAP (5.1% versus 2.0%, respectively, P<0.001); 75.6% of CAP episodes were associated with hospital admission compared to 22.1% of exacerbations.,Older age and increasing grade of airflow limitation were independently associated with increased odds of CAP and hospital admission with CAP.,Other independent predictors of future CAP included lower body mass index, inhaled corticosteroid use, prior frequent exacerbations and comorbidities, including ischemic heart disease and diabetes.,CAP in COPD demonstrates clear seasonal patterns, with patient characteristics predictive of the odds of future CAP and hospital admission with CAP.,Highlighting this burden of COPD-associated CAP during the winter period informs us of the likely triggers and the need for more effective preventive strategies.

The time of year when patients experience exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a much-overlooked feature of the disease.,The higher incidence of exacerbations in winter has important consequences for patients in terms of increased morbidity and mortality.,The seasonality also imposes a considerable burden on already-overloaded health care services, with both primary care consultations and hospital admissions increasing in number.,The seasonality of exacerbations varies with latitude, and is greater in more temperate climates, where there may be less protection from outdoor and indoor cold exposure.,The precise causes of the seasonality are unknown, but thought to be partly due to the increased prevalence of respiratory viral infections circulating in cold, damp conditions.,Increased susceptibility to viral infection may also be a mechanism mediated through increased airway inflammation or possibly reduced vitamin D levels.,The seasonality of exacerbations informs us about the triggers of exacerbations and suggests possible strategies to reduce their number.

Since the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes framework, there has been some evidence of improvement in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in the United Kingdom through increasing rates of smoking cessation advice and immunisations against influenza.,However, it is unknown whether disease-specific management criteria, disease outcomes and diagnosis have improved.,To describe changes in the management and outcomes of patients with COPD in UK general practice between 2000 and 2009.,The study was done on a retrospective cohort using data from The Health Improvement Network UK primary care database.,We calculated age at diagnosis of COPD and death, total number of short-term oral corticosteroid courses and consultations, and proportion of patients with very severe COPD and on triple inhaled therapy for each year between 2000 and 2009.,We identified 92,576 patients with COPD.,The mean age at COPD diagnosis decreased from 68.1 years in 2000 to 66.7 years in 2009.,The mean age at death increased from 78.2 years in 2000 to 78.8 years in 2009.,The number of prescribed courses of oral corticosteroids increased from 0.6 in 2000 to 0.8 in 2009.,The number of consultations increased from 9.4 in 2004 to 11.3 in 2009.,The risk of having very severe COPD decreased from 9.4% in 2004 to 6.8% in 2009.,The likelihood of patients with very severe COPD receiving triple therapy increased from 25% in 2004 to 59% in 2009.,The trends suggest that management and outcomes observed in patients with COPD may have improved since the year 2000.

Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations.,This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database.,This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis.,A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD).,The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset.,Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively).,ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B.,Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS.,Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS.,A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10).,COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting.,Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms.,Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history.,Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide.,Here, we present methods and disease and risk estimates for COPD and asthma from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) 2015 study.,The GBD study provides annual updates on estimates of deaths, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a summary measure of fatal and non-fatal disease outcomes, for over 300 diseases and injuries, for 188 countries from 1990 to the most recent year.,We estimated numbers of deaths due to COPD and asthma using the GBD Cause of Death Ensemble modelling (CODEm) tool.,First, we analysed data from vital registration and verbal autopsy for the aggregate category of all chronic respiratory diseases.,Subsequently, models were run for asthma and COPD relying on covariates to predict rates in countries that have incomplete or no vital registration data.,Disease estimates for COPD and asthma were based on systematic reviews of published papers, unpublished reports, surveys, and health service encounter data from the USA.,We used the Global Initiative of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometry-based definition as the reference for COPD and a reported diagnosis of asthma with current wheeze as the definition of asthma.,We used a Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to derive estimates of prevalence and incidence.,We estimated population-attributable fractions for risk factors for COPD and asthma from exposure data, relative risks, and a theoretical minimum exposure level.,Results were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a composite measure of income per capita, mean years of education over the age of 15 years, and total fertility rate.,In 2015, 3·2 million people (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 3·1 million to 3·3 million) died from COPD worldwide, an increase of 11·6% (95% UI 5·3 to 19·8) compared with 1990.,There was a decrease in age-standardised death rate of 41·9% (37·7 to 45·1) but this was counteracted by population growth and ageing of the global population.,From 1990 to 2015, the prevalence of COPD increased by 44·2% (41·7 to 46·6), whereas age-standardised prevalence decreased by 14·7% (13·5 to 15·9).,In 2015, 0·40 million people (0·36 million to 0·44 million) died from asthma, a decrease of 26·7% (−7·2 to 43·7) from 1990, and the age-standardised death rate decreased by 58·8% (39·0 to 69·0).,The prevalence of asthma increased by 12·6% (9·0 to 16·4), whereas the age-standardised prevalence decreased by 17·7% (15·1 to 19·9).,Age-standardised DALY rates due to COPD increased until the middle range of the SDI before reducing sharply.,Age-standardised DALY rates due to asthma in both sexes decreased monotonically with rising SDI.,The relation between with SDI and DALY rates due to asthma was attributed to variation in years of life lost (YLLs), whereas DALY rates due to COPD varied similarly for YLLs and years lived with disability across the SDI continuum.,Smoking and ambient particulate matter were the main risk factors for COPD followed by household air pollution, occupational particulates, ozone, and secondhand smoke.,Together, these risks explained 73·3% (95% UI 65·8 to 80·1) of DALYs due to COPD.,Smoking and occupational asthmagens were the only risks quantified for asthma in GBD, accounting for 16·5% (14·6 to 18·7) of DALYs due to asthma.,Asthma was the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide in 2015, with twice the number of cases of COPD.,Deaths from COPD were eight times more common than deaths from asthma.,In 2015, COPD caused 2·6% of global DALYs and asthma 1·1% of global DALYs.,Although there are laudable international collaborative efforts to make surveys of asthma and COPD more comparable, no consensus exists on case definitions and how to measure disease severity for population health measurements like GBD.,Comparisons between countries and over time are important, as much of the chronic respiratory burden is either preventable or treatable with affordable interventions.,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of patients with COPD.,Their characteristics and possible risk factors in this population are not yet well defined.,We analyzed data from 14 countries that participated in the international, population-based Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study.,Participants were aged ≥ 40 years and completed postbronchodilator spirometry testing plus questionnaires about respiratory symptoms, health status, and exposure to COPD risk factors.,A diagnosis of COPD was based on the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio, according to current GOLD (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease) guidelines.,In addition to this, the lower limit of normal (LLN) was evaluated as an alternative threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Among 4,291 never smokers, 6.6% met criteria for mild (GOLD stage I) COPD, and 5.6% met criteria for moderate to very severe (GOLD stage II+) COPD.,Although never smokers were less likely to have COPD and had less severe COPD than ever smokers, never smokers nonetheless comprised 23.3% (240/1,031) of those classified with GOLD stage II+ COPD.,This proportion was similar, 20.5% (171/832), even when the LLN was used as a threshold for the FEV1/FVC ratio.,Predictors of COPD in never smokers include age, education, occupational exposure, childhood respiratory diseases, and BMI alterations.,This multicenter international study confirms previous evidence that never smokers comprise a substantial proportion of individuals with COPD.,Our data suggest that, in addition to increased age, a prior diagnosis of asthma and, among women, lower education levels are associated with an increased risk for COPD among never smokers.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a crucial part of the nonpharmacological treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but management remains problematic.,WeChat could serve as a useful tool in patient management.,Baduanjin is a popular exercise in China that is usually applied in pulmonary rehabilitation, which has been confirmed to be effective in improving lung function and life quality.,This study aimed to explore the efficiency of WeChat in the management of Baduanjin exercise in COPD patients.,A total of 200 patients from the respiratory department of Putuo Hospital participated in the Baduanjin rehabilitation project from September 2018 to October 2019, and were randomly assigned to the WeChat and control groups and followed up using the WeChat platform or telephone for 12 weeks.,The frequency of Baduanjin exercise, lung function (percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second predicted, FEV1% predicted), and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores were collected and compared between the two groups.,The number of message exchanges and a satisfaction survey on the WeChat platform were used to assess the feasibility of WeChat management outside the hospital.,The Baduanjin exercise frequency significantly differed between the control group and WeChat group (F=33.82, P<.001) and across various time points (F=214.87, P<.001).,After the follow-up on WeChat, there were fewer patients not performing Baduanjin exercise.,The FEV1% predicted value significantly differed before and after Baduanjin exercise in the control group (Z=−3.686, P<.001) and the WeChat group (Z=−6.985, P<.001).,A significant difference in the FEV1% predicted value was observed after Baduanjin exercise between the two groups (Z=−3.679, P<.001).,The CAT score significantly differed before and after Baduanjin exercise in the control group (Z=−4.937, P<.001) and the WeChat group (Z=−5.246, P<.001).,A significant difference in the CAT score was observed after Baduanjin exercise between the two groups (Z=−5.246, P<.001).,The number of completed Baduanjin exercises, lung function, and CAT scores in active patients were higher than those in nonactive patients.,All satisfaction survey items were scored with more than 4 points.,Among the items, the highest score (mean 4.54, SD 0.77) was for continued WeChat management, followed by the effective management of Baduanjin exercise (mean 4.46, SD 0.87).,The patients in the WeChat group showed much higher enthusiasm for and compliance with Baduanjin exercise, resulting in better life quality and lung function.,The patients were very satisfied with the WeChat management because of the obvious curative effect and home feeling.,The WeChat platform provided a feasible, effective, and sustainable management plan for Baduanjin rehabilitation.,Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900028248; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?,proj=46995

Integrated pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may prevent acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD).,The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, before and 12 months after, the use of an integrated PR program in patients discharged from hospital for AECOPD.,A retrospective observational clinical study included patients diagnosed with COPD who participated in a domiciliary integrated PR program that included a weekly phone interview supervised by a respiratory team.,A six-minute walk test (6MWT), COPD assessment test (CAT), and the modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) were evaluated every three months.,Of the 303 eligible patients, 267 patients (88.1%), with a mean age of 64.9±8.7 years, a mean FEV1 percentage predicted of 48.8±12.9%, successfully completed the 12-month study program and achieved a significant improvement in their clinical performance with a significantly reduced frequency of episodes of EACOPD (3.1±1.7 vs.,2.0±1.4) (p<0.001), a significant reduction in emergency department visits (2.5±1.5 vs.,1.2±1.1) (p<0.001), and significantly reduced episodes of hospitalization (2.0±1.2 vs.,1.4±1.2) (p<0.001).,Significant patient benefits were found during the 12-month study, on CAT, mMRC, and patient well-being when compared with the end of the study after 12 months (p<0.001).,A multidisciplinary integrated PR program maintained a significant clinical improvement, in patients with COPD by reducing episodes of AECOPD, CAT, mMRC, emergency hospital admissions, and improved patient well-being, for the duration of the program.

Study of the causes of the reduced levels of physical activity in patients with COPD has been scarce and limited to biological factors.,To assess the relationship between novel socio-environmental factors, namely dog walking, grandparenting, neighbourhood deprivation, residential surrounding greenness and residential proximity to green or blue spaces, and amount and intensity of physical activity in COPD patients.,This cross-sectional study recruited 410 COPD patients from five Catalan municipalities.,Dog walking and grandparenting were assessed by questionnaire.,Neighbourhood deprivation was assessed using the census Urban Vulnerability Index, residential surrounding greenness by the satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and residential proximity to green or blue spaces as living within 300 m of such a space.,Physical activity was measured during 1 week by accelerometer to assess time spent on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and vector magnitude units (VMU) per minute.,Patients were 85% male, had a mean (SD) age of 69 (9) years, and post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 56 (17) %pred.,After adjusting for age, sex, socio-economic status, dyspnoea, exercise capacity and anxiety in a linear regression model, both dog walking and grandparenting were significantly associated with an increase both in time in MVPA (18 min/day (p<0.01) and 9 min/day (p<0.05), respectively) and in physical activity intensity (76 VMU/min (p=0.05) and 59 VMUs/min (p<0.05), respectively).,Neighbourhood deprivation, surrounding greenness and proximity to green or blue spaces were not associated with physical activity.,Dog walking and grandparenting are associated with a higher amount and intensity of physical activity in COPD patients.,Pre-results, NCT01897298.

Multi-morbidity is common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and low levels of physical activity are hypothesized to be an important risk factor.,The current study aimed to assess the longitudinal association between physical activity and risk of seven categories of comorbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.,The study included 409 patients from primary care practice in the Netherlands and Switzerland.,We assessed physical activity using the Longitudinal Ageing Study Amsterdam Physical Activity Questionnaire at baseline and followed patients for up to 5 years.,During follow-up, patients reported their comorbidities (cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, musculoskeletal, malignant, and infectious diseases) and completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire for mental health assessment.,We implemented multinomial logistic regression (an approximation to discrete time survival model using death as a competing risk) for our analysis.,Study results did not suggest a statistically significant association of baseline physical activity with the development of seven categories of comorbidity.,However, when we focused on depression and anxiety symptoms, we found that higher levels of physical activity at baseline were associated with a lower risk for depression (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 0.75-0.95; p = 0.005) and anxiety (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 0.79-1.00; p = 0.045).,In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, those with high physical activity are less likely to develop depression or anxiety symptoms over time.,Increasing physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients may be an approach for testing to lower the burden from incident depression and anxiety.,Patients with chronic lung disease who stay physically active could reduce their chances of depression and anxiety.,Milo Puhan at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, and co-workers assessed the association between physical activity and the risk of developing various co-existing diseases in 409 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Co-morbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and depression are prevalent in patients with COPD, but the reasons why are not clear.,Puhan’s team assessed patients’ activity levels using an existing questionnaire, and administered another questionnaire to assess mental health.,They followed the cohort for 5 years.,Results indicated weak associations between physical activity levels and most physical illnesses, but there were significant links between higher levels of physical activity and a reduced risk of depression and anxiety.,The results could inform novel COPD treatment programs.

Heterogeneous nature of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) must be comprehensively addressed.,It is unclear if integrative multidisciplinary disease management (IMDM) can optimize clinical outcomes of patients with COPD.,A single-center, retrospective cohort observational study with a historical intervention was conducted in a clinic specialized for COPD care.,Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD were administered IMDM with measurement of BODE score on initial and follow-up visits.,Primary outcomes were dynamic changes in BODE quartiles after receiving IMDM.,Of 124 patients, 21% were misdiagnosed with COPD.,Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD were 50% female, median age 64 years (IQR 57-70), 43% actively smoking and initial visit median BODE quartile 2 (IQR 1-3).,Three subgroups were identified based on the changes in BODE quartiles: worsened (21%), unchanged (55%) and improved (24%).,At baseline, mMRC (median [IQR]) was higher in improved subgroup vs worsened and unchanged subgroup (3 [3, 4] vs 2 [1, 2] vs 2 [1, 3], p value 0.002) respectively.,Drop in all components of BODE score was noted in worsened group, but significant improvement in mMRC with preservation of spirometry values was noted in the improved group.,The incidence of smoking cigarettes changed from 39% to 26% during follow-up.,Our study demonstrates that IMDM can be potentially effective in a subgroup of COPD patients.,In others precipitous drop in lung function, activity tolerance, and subjective symptoms seems inevitable with worsening BODE quartiles.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by different phenotypes with either bronchial airways alterations or emphysema prevailing.,As blood biomarkers could be clinically useful for COPD stratification, we aimed at investigating the levels of blood biomarkers in COPD patients differentiated by phenotype: prevalent chronic airway disease versus emphysema.,In 23 COPD patients with prevalent airway disease (COPD-B), 22 COPD patients with prevalent emphysema (COPD-E), 9 control smokers (CSs), and 18 control nonsmokers (CNSs), we analyzed the expression levels of interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, epidermal growth factor (EGF), monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in plasma/serum; glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD)-1 by immunochemical kits in plasma; and free F2-isoprostanes (F2-IsoPs) by gas chromatography in plasma.,F2-IsoPs level was increased in COPD-B and COPD-E compared with CSs and CNSs; in addition, CS showed higher levels than CNSs; SOD1 level was lower in COPD-B and COPD-E than that in CNSs.,Interestingly, MCP-1 level was higher only in COPD-E versus CSs and CNSs; EGF and IL-8 levels were higher in COPD-B and COPD-E versus CNSs; IL-6 level was increased in all three smoking groups (COPD-B, COPD-E, and CSs) versus CNS; IFN-γ and IL-1α levels were higher in CSs than in CNSs; and IL-1α level was also higher in CSs versus COPD-B and COPD-E.,In all subjects, F2-IsoPs level correlated positively and significantly with MCP-1, IL-2, IL-1β, IFN-γ, and TNF-α and negatively with SOD1.,When correlations were restricted to COPD-E and COPD-B groups, F2-IsoPs maintained the positive associations with IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2.,We did not find any specific blood biomarkers that could differentiate COPD patients with prevalent airway disease from those with prevalent emphysema.,The MCP-1 increase in COPD-E, associated with the imbalance of oxidant/antioxidant markers, may play a role in inducing emphysema.

There is now convincing evidence that the airway epithelium drives the pathogenesis of COPD.,A major aspect of this is the disease-related reduction in barrier function that is potentiated by dysregulation of tight junction (TJ) protein complexes.,However, a significant number of studies using in vitro smoke exposure models have not observed alterations in barrier permeability.,We have previously shown that zinc (Zn) is an influential cytoprotective factor for the airway epithelium, and its depletion by cigarette smoke produces disease-related modifications consistent with inflammatory changes in COPD.,We hypothesized that Zn deficiency is a significant co-stimulus with cigarette smoke extract (CSE) for potentiating the leaky barrier phenotype exhibited in COPD.,We employed an ex vivo model of differentiated human airway epithelium exposed to Zn depletion and CSE to determine the contribution of Zn in maintaining normal epithelial permeability.,Western blot analysis demonstrated a significant downregulation of the TJ proteins such as ZO-1 (−1.93-fold, P<0.05) and Claudin-1 (−3.37-fold, P<0.01) with the combination exposure.,Assessment of barrier function via paracellular ionic conductance and tracer permeability also showed that Zn depletion was an important factor, which potentiated an increase in epithelial permeability (P<0.001 for both) compared to Zn depletion or CSE exposures in isolation.,Visual inspection of the epithelium using transmission electron microscopy revealed a marked reduction in junction complexes between the adjacent airway epithelial cells treated with a combination of Zn depletion and CSE.,These observations identify Zn deficiency as a significant codeterminant with CSE as a factor leading to an increase in airway epithelial permeability.,Hence, as Zn dyshomeostasis has been reported in the airway epithelium exposed to chronic cigarette smoke and inflammation, targeting these phenomena may represent a promising strategy to ameliorate the leaky barrier phenotype that is synonymous with COPD.

The Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) is a chloride channel that primarily resides in airway epithelial cells.,Decreased CFTR expression and/or function lead to impaired airway surface liquid (ASL) volume homeostasis, resulting in accumulation of mucus, reduced clearance of bacteria, and chronic infection and inflammation.,Expression of CFTR and the cigarette smoke metal content were assessed in lung samples of controls and COPD patients with established GOLD stage 4.,CFTR protein and mRNA were quantified by immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively.,Metals present in lung samples were quantified by ICP-AES.,The effect of cigarette smoke on down-regulation of CFTR expression and function was assessed using primary human airway epithelial cells.,The role of leading metal(s) found in lung samples of GOLD 4 COPD patients involved in the alteration of CFTR was confirmed by exposing human bronchial epithelial cells 16HBE14o- to metal-depleted cigarette smoke extracts.,We found that CFTR expression is reduced in the lungs of GOLD 4 COPD patients, especially in bronchial epithelial cells.,Assessment of metals present in lung samples revealed that cadmium and manganese were significantly higher in GOLD 4 COPD patients when compared to control smokers (GOLD 0).,Primary human airway epithelial cells exposed to cigarette smoke resulted in decreased expression of CFTR protein and reduced airway surface liquid height.,16HBE14o-cells exposed to cigarette smoke also exhibited reduced levels of CFTR protein and mRNA.,Removal and/or addition of metals to cigarette smoke extracts before exposure established their role in decrease of CFTR in airway epithelial cells.,CFTR expression is reduced in the lungs of patients with severe COPD.,This effect is associated with the accumulation of cadmium and manganese suggesting a role for these metals in the pathogenesis of COPD.

Efficacy and safety of tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with the mono-components was evaluated in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in two replicate, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III trials.,Patients received tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg or 5 μg, or olodaterol 5 μg delivered once-daily via Respimat inhaler over 52 weeks.,Primary end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) response, trough FEV1 response and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 24 weeks.,In total, 5162 patients (2624 in Study 1237.5 and 2538 in Study 1237.6) received treatment.,Both FDCs significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 response versus the mono-components in both studies.,Statistically significant improvements in SGRQ total score versus the mono-components were only seen for tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 5/5 μg.,Incidence of adverse events was comparable between the FDCs and the mono-components.,These studies demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life with once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol FDC versus mono-components over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Lung function and symptomatic benefits of daily tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination in moderate to very severe COPDhttp://ow.ly/DIKiY

Even with the dissemination of several clinical guidelines, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains underdiagnosed and mismanaged by many primary care physicians (PCPs).,The objective of this study was to elucidate barriers to consistent implementation of COPD guidelines.,A cross-sectional study implemented in July 2008 was designed to assess attitudes and barriers to COPD guideline usage.,Five hundred US PCPs (309 family medicine physicians, 191 internists) were included in the analysis.,Overall, 23.6% of the surveyed PCPs reported adherence to spirometry guidelines over 90% of the time; 25.8% reported adherence to guidelines related to long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) use in COPD patients.,In general, physicians were only somewhat familiar with COPD guidelines, and internal medicine physicians were significantly more familiar than family physicians (P < 0.05).,In a multivariate model controlling for demographics and barriers to guideline adherence, we found significant associations with two tested guideline components.,Adherence to spirometry guidelines was associated with agreement with guidelines, confidence in interpreting data, ambivalence to outcome expectancy, and ability to incorporate spirometry into patient flow.,Adherence to LABD therapy guidelines was associated with agreement with guidelines and confidence in gauging pharmacologic response.,Adherence to guideline recommendations of spirometry use was predicted by agreement with the recommendations, self-efficacy, perceived outcome expectancy if recommendations were adhered to, and resource availability.,Adherence to recommendations of LABD use was predicted by agreement with guideline recommendations and self-efficacy.,Increasing guideline familiarity alone may have limited patient outcomes, as other barriers, such as low confidence and outcome expectancy, are more likely to impact guideline adherence.

There are no studies analyzing the relationship between emphysema and lung cancer (LC).,With this aim and in order to make some comparisons between different clinical variables, we carried out the present study.,This is a case-control study, patients with COPD and LC being the cases and subjects with stable COPD being the controls.,Clinical and functional parameters, as well as the existence of radiological emphysema, were evaluated in a qualitative and quantitative way, using a radiological density of −950 Hounsfield units as a cutoff point in the images.,The existence of several different types of emphysema (centrilobular, paraseptal, panacinar, or bullae) was analyzed, allowing patients to have more than one simultaneously.,The extent to which lobes were involved was evaluated and the extension of emphysema was graduated for each type and location, following a quantitative scale.,Differences between cases and controls were compared by using bivariate and multivariate analyzes with results expressed as OR and 95% CI.,We included 169 cases and 74 controls, 84% men with a FEV1 (%) of 61.7±18.5, with 90.1% non-exacerbators.,Most of them (50%) were active smokers and 47.2% were ex-smokers.,Emphysema was found in 80.2% of the subjects, the most frequent type being centrilobular (34.4%).,The only significantly different factor was the presence of paraseptal emphysema (alone or combined; OR =2.2 [95% CI =1.1-4.3, P = 0.03]), with adenocarcinoma being significantly more frequent in paraseptal emphysema with respect to other types (67.2% vs 32.8%, P =0.03).,Patients with COPD and paraseptal emphysema could be a risk group for the development of LC, especially adenocarcinoma subtype.

The syndrome of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a recently described entity associating upper-lobe emphysema and lower-lobe fibrosis.,We sought to evaluate differences in pulmonary function between CPFE patients with and without airflow obstruction.,Thirty-one CPFE patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of irreversible airflow obstruction based on spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity <70% following inhalation of a β2-agonist) as follows: CPFE patients with airflow obstruction (CPFE OB+ group, n=11), and CPFE patients without airflow obstruction (CPFE OB− group, n=20).,Pulmonary function, including respiratory impedance evaluated using impulse oscillometry and dynamic hyperinflation following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation, was retrospectively analyzed in comparison with that observed in 49 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (n=49).,In imaging findings, low-attenuation-area scores on chest high-resolution computed tomography, representing the degree of emphysema, were significantly lower in the CPFE OB− group than in the CPFE OB+ and COPD groups.,In contrast, the severity of pulmonary fibrosis was greater in the CPFE OB− group than in the CPFE OB+ group.,In pulmonary function, lung hyperinflation was not apparent in the CPFE OB− group.,Impairment of diffusion capacity was severe in both the CPFE OB− and CPFE OB+ groups.,Impulse oscillometry showed that respiratory resistance was not apparent in the CPFE OB− group compared with the COPD group, and that easy collapsibility of small airways during expiration of tidal breath was not apparent in the CPFE OB+ group compared with the COPD group.,Dynamic hyperinflation following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation was significantly greater in the COPD group than in the CPFE OB− group, and also tended to be greater in the CPFE OB+ group than in the CPFE OB− group.,The mechanisms underlying impairment of physiological function may differ among CPFE OB+ patients, CPFE OB− patients, and COPD patients.,CPFE is a heterogeneous disease, and may have distinct phenotypes physiologically and radiologically.

To clarify the relationship between asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS) and depression.,We identified 10,911 patients who received an ACOS diagnosis and concurrent treatment between January 2000 and December 2009.,Subjects without ACOS were included in the non-ACOS cohort (n = 10,911).,Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to compare the risk of depression between the ACOS and non-ACOS cohorts.,The risk of depression was higher in the ACOS cohort than in the non-ACOS cohort (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.48-1.88).,In the ACOS cohort, the aHRs for depression were [2.44 (95% CI = 1.45-4.11); 2.36 (95% CI = 1.58-3.52)] in patients [aged 20-39 years; without comorbidity].,In the ACOS cohort, the aHRs for depression were 1.70 (95% CI = 1.51-1.93) and 1.84 (95% CI = 1.55-2.19) in patients without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and oral steroids (OSs) use, respectively.,Moreover, the aHRs for the risk of depression were 1.16 (95% CI = 0.95-1.41) and 1.12 (95% CI = 0.96-1.29) in patients with ICSs and OSs use, respectively.,The risk of depression is higher in ACOS patients, even in those without comorbidities or in young adults.,The events of the depression were not significant difference in patients receiving the ICSs/OSs between the ACOS and the non-ACOS cohorts.

Initial use of inhaled corticosteroid therapy is common in patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A or B chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contrary to GOLD guidelines.,We investigated UK prescribing of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in these patients, to identify predictors of inhaled corticosteroid use in newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.,A cohort of newly diagnosed GOLD A/B chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients was identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (June 2005-June 2015).,Patients were classified by prescribed treatment, with those receiving inhaled corticosteroid-containing therapy compared with those receiving long-acting bronchodilators without inhaled corticosteroid.,In all, 29,815 patients with spirometry-confirmed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were identified.,Of those prescribed maintenance therapy within 3 months of diagnosis, 63% were prescribed inhaled corticosteroid-containing therapy vs. 37% prescribed non-inhaled corticosteroid therapy.,FEV1% predicted, concurrent asthma diagnosis, region, and moderate exacerbation were the strongest predictors of inhaled corticosteroid use in the overall cohort.,When concurrent asthma patients were excluded, all other co-variates remained significant predictors.,Other significant predictors included general practitioner practice, younger age, and co-prescription with short-acting bronchodilators.,Trends over time showed that initial inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions reduced throughout the study, but still accounted for 47% of initial prescriptions in 2015.,These results suggest that inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in GOLD A/B patients is common, with significant regional variation that is independent of FEV1% predicted.,Inhaled steroids are often prescribed to early-stage chronic lung disease patients in the UK despite guidelines to the contrary.,Patients newly diagnosed with early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should not be prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), because they carry an increased risk of side effects such as pneumonia and osteoporosis.,ICS should be reserved for patients with severe COPD and frequent exacerbations.,James Chalmers at the Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, Dundee, and co-workers examined prescribed medication data from the UK spanning 10 years, to determine key predictors of ICS prescription during early-stage COPD.,Of 29,815 patients identified, an average of 63% were prescribed ICS upon diagnosis, regardless of disease severity.,Younger patients were more likely to receive ICS, possibly due to co-morbidity with chronic asthma, and particular UK regions and medical practices prescribed ICS more readily than others.

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a guideline-recommended multifaceted intervention that improves the physical and psychological well-being of people with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), though most of the evidence derives from trials in high-resource settings.,In low- and middle-income countries, PR services are under-provided.,We aimed to review the effectiveness, components and mode of delivery of PR in low-resource settings.,Following Cochrane methodology, we systematically searched (1990 to October 2018; pre-publication update March 2020) MEDLINE, EMBASE, CABI, AMED, PUBMED, and CENTRAL for controlled clinical trials of adults with CRD (including but not restricted to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) comparing PR with usual care in low-resource settings.,After duplicate selection, we extracted data on exercise tolerance, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), breathlessness, included components, and mode of delivery.,We used Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) to assess study quality and synthesised data narratively.,From 8912 hits, we included 13 studies: 11 were at high RoB; 2 at moderate RoB.,PR improved functional exercise capacity in 10 studies, HRQoL in 12, and breathlessness in 9 studies.,One of the two studies at moderate RoB showed no benefit.,All programmes included exercise training; most provided education, chest physiotherapy, and breathing exercises.,Low cost services, adapted to the setting, used limited equipment and typically combined outpatient/centre delivery with a home/community-based service.,Multicomponent PR programmes can be delivered in low-resource settings, employing a range of modes of delivery.,There is a need for a high-quality trial to confirm the positive findings of these high/moderate RoB studies.

Rationale: People living with both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and frailty have high potential to benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation but face challenges completing programs.,However, research to understand ways to optimize participation in this group is lacking.,Objectives: To explore the experiences, needs, and preferences of people with COPD and frailty referred for outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.,Methods: Semistructured interviews with people with COPD and physical frailty, purposively sampled by age, living status, level of frailty, and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation.,Thematic analysis with a critical realist perspective was used, involving relevant stakeholders with clinical, academic, and lived experience for interpretive rigor.,Results: Nineteen people with COPD and frailty were interviewed, with a median age of 78 years (range, 58-88).,Nine did not complete their pulmonary rehabilitation program.,Four themes were identified: striving to adapt to multidimensional loss, tensions of balancing support with independence, pulmonary rehabilitation as a challenge worth facing, and overcoming unpredictable disruptions to participation.,Participants described constantly adapting to their changing health and resulting multidimensional losses (e.g., functional abilities, relationships, confidence).,This involved traversing between independence and seeking support, set against a mismatch between their needs and what support is available.,People with COPD and frailty can be highly motivated to participate in pulmonary rehabilitation, despite the physical and mental demands it entails, and report a range of benefits.,Yet in the context of changeable health, they must often overcome multiple unpredictable disruptions to completing rehabilitation programs.,Participant determination and flexibility of services can facilitate ongoing attendance, but for some, these unpredictable disruptions erode their motivation to attend.,Conclusions: People with COPD and frailty experience accumulating, multidimensional loss.,This group are motivated to complete pulmonary rehabilitation but often require additional support and flexibility owing to fluctuating and unpredictable health.,Person-centered approaches should be considered to minimize disruptive health events and support pulmonary rehabilitation participation and completion.,Service adaptations could allow more flexibility to meet the changing needs of this group and enable communication around how pulmonary rehabilitation might align with their priorities.

Long-acting bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment of COPD.,The new combination of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium (TIO) and long acting beta-agonists (LABA) olodaterol (OLO) has been introduced as fist line therapy for COPD.,This article analyses the evidence of efficacy and safety of the TIO/OLO combination.,A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with a period of treatment of at least 6 weeks, in patients with COPD confirmed by spirometry, comparing combined treatment with TIO/OLO (approved doses only), with any of the mono-components or any other active comparator administered as an inhalator.,A total of 10 Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified (N = 10,918).,TIO/OLO significantly improved trough FEV1 from baseline to week 12 versus TIO, OLO and LABA/ICS (0.06 L, 0.09 L and between 0.04 and 0.05 L, respectively).,TIO/OLO improved transitional dyspnea index (TDI) and St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) compared with mono-components, with patients more likely to achieve clinically important improvements in TDI (risk ratio [RR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.07, 1.28] versus TIO and RR: 1.14, 95%CI: [1.01, 1.28] versus OLO) and in SGRQ (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: [1.12, 1.30] versus TIO and RR: 1.28, 95%CI: [1.18, 1.40] versus OLO).,Patients treated with TIO/OLO showed a significant reduction in the use of rescue medication and no significant differences in frequency of general and serious adverse events were observed between TIO/OLO and mono-components.,Treatment with TIO/OLO provided significant improvements in lung function versus mono-components and LABA/ICS with more patients achieving significant improvements in dyspnea and health status.,No differences in adverse events were observed compared with other active treatments.,PROSPERO register of systematic reviews (CRD42016040162).,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-017-0683-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is a novel fixed dose combination of a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting beta 2 receptor antagonist (LABA) agent.,This analysis evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of UMEC/VI compared with tiotropium (TIO), from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.,A previously published linked equations cohort model based on the epidemiological longitudinal study ECLIPSE (Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate End-points) was used.,Patients included were COPD patients with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤70% and the presence of respiratory symptoms measured with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (modified Medical Research Council ≥2).,Treatment effect, expressed as change in FEV1 from baseline, was estimated from a 24-week head-to-head phase III clinical trial comparing once-daily UMEC/VI with once-daily TIO and was assumed to last 52 weeks following treatment initiation (maximum duration of UMEC/VI clinical trials).,Spanish utility values were derived from a published local observational study.,Unitary health care costs (€2015) were obtained from local sources.,A 3-year time horizon was selected, and 3% discount was applied to effects and costs.,Results were expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).,Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed.,UMEC/VI produced additional 0.03 QALY and €590 vs TIO, leading to an ICER of €21,475/QALY.,According to PSA, the probability of UMEC/VI being cost-effective was 80.3% at a willingness-to-pay of €30,000/QALY.,UMEC/VI could be considered as a cost-effective treatment alternative compared with TIO in symptomatic COPD patients from the Spanish NHS perspective.

Mitochondrial damage and dysfunction have been reported in airway and quadriceps muscle cells of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We determined the concomitance of mitochondrial dysfunction in these cells in COPD.,Bronchial biopsies were obtained from never- and ex-smoker volunteers and COPD patients (GOLD Grade 2) and quadriceps muscle biopsies from the same volunteers in addition to COPD patients at GOLD Grade 3/4 for measurement of mitochondrial function.,Decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and decreased superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) levels were observed in mitochondria isolated from bronchial biopsies from Grade 2 patients compared to healthy never- and ex-smokers.,There was a significant correlation between ΔΨm and FEV1 (% predicted), transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TLCOC % predicted), 6-min walk test and maximum oxygen consumption.,In addition, ΔΨm was also associated with decreased expression levels of electron transport chain (ETC) complex proteins I and II.,In quadriceps muscle of Grade 2 COPD patients, a significant increase in total ROS and mtROS was observed without changes in ΔΨm, SOD2 or ETC complex protein expression.,However, quadriceps muscle of GOLD Grade 3/4 COPD patients showed an increased mtROS and decreased SOD2 and ETC complex proteins I, II, III and V expression.,Mitochondrial dysfunction in the airways, but not in quadriceps muscle, is associated with airflow obstruction and exercise capacity in Grade 2 COPD.,Oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in the quadriceps may result from similar disease processes occurring in the lungs.

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are characterized by different patterns of airway remodeling, which all include an increased mass of bronchial smooth muscle (BSM).,A remaining major question concerns the mechanisms underlying such a remodeling of BSM.,Because mitochondria play a major role in both cell proliferation and apoptosis, we hypothesized that mitochondrial activation in BSM could play a role in this remodeling.,We describe that both the mitochondrial mass and oxygen consumption were higher in the BSM from asthmatic subjects than in that from both COPD and controls.,This feature, which is specific to asthma, was related to an enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis through up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator (PGC)-1α, nuclear respiratory factor-1, and mitochondrial transcription factor A.,The priming event of such activation was an alteration in BSM calcium homeostasis.,BSM cell apoptosis was not different in the three groups of subjects.,Asthmatic BSM was, however, characterized by increased cell growth and proliferation.,Both characteristics were completely abrogated in mitochondria-deficient asthmatic BSM cells.,Conversely, in both COPD and control BSM cells, induction of mitochondrial biogenesis reproduced these characteristics.,Thus, BSM in asthmatic patients is characterized by an altered calcium homeostasis that increases mitochondrial biogenesis, which, in turn, enhances cell proliferation, leading to airway remodeling.

Cytokines play an important part in many pathobiological processes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including the chronic inflammatory process, emphysema, and altered innate immune response.,Proinflammatory cytokines of potential importance include tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-17, IL-18, IL-32, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and growth factors such as transforming growth factor-β.,The current objectives of COPD treatment are to reduce symptoms, and to prevent and reduce the number of exacerbations.,While current treatments achieve these goals to a certain extent, preventing the decline in lung function is not currently achievable.,In addition, reversal of corticosteroid insensitivity and control of the fibrotic process while reducing the emphysematous process could also be controlled by specific cytokines.,The abnormal pathobiological process of COPD may contribute to these fundamental characteristics of COPD, and therefore targeting cytokines involved may be a fruitful endeavor.,Although there has been much work that has implicated various cytokines as potentially playing an important role in COPD, there have been very few studies that have examined the effect of specific cytokine blockade in COPD.,The two largest studies that have been reported in the literature involve the use of blocking antibody to TNFα and CXCL8 (IL-8), and neither has provided benefit.,Blocking the actions of CXCL8 through its CXCR2 receptor blockade was not successful either.,Studies of antibodies against IL-17, IL-18, IL-1β, and TSLP are currently either being undertaken or planned.,There is a need to carefully phenotype COPD and discover good biomarkers of drug efficacy for each specific target.,Specific groups of COPD patients should be targeted with specific anticytokine therapy if there is evidence of high expression of that cytokine and there are features of the clinical expression of COPD that will respond.

The incidence and severity of chronic lung diseases is growing and affects between 100 and 150 million people worldwide and is associated with a significant rate of mortality.,Unfortunately, the initial cause that triggers most chronic lung diseases remains unknown and current available therapies only ameliorate, but do not cure the disease.,Thus, there is a need for identification of new targets and development of novel therapies especially for those most severely affected.,IL-6, like other inflammatory cytokines, has been shown to be elevated in different lung diseases, but it was considered a byproduct of ongoing inflammation in the lung.,However, recent studies support a dissociation of IL-6 from inflammation in the lung and suggest that this cytokine plays an active role in pathogenesis of asthma and, in all likelihood, COPD.,IL-6 may therefore be a germane target for treatment of these and other chronic lung disease.,Here, we provide an overview of the studies in mouse models and human patients that provide support for the involvement of IL-6 in lung diseases.

The GOLD report provides a framework for classifying COPD in a way that reflects its clinical impact and allows treatment recommendations.,The GOLD 2017 proposes a new classification whereby patients are grouped as A-D according to their symptoms and history of exacerbations.,However, the clinical characteristics and outcomes in these patients are not well documented.,In this prospective observational study, we analyzed data from the Ishinomaki COPD Network Registry.,All patients with stable COPD were classified into the four groups defined by GOLD 2017.,The patient demographics, clinical characteristics, number of exacerbations, and mortality rate during 1 year of follow-up were compared between the groups.,Four hundred and one patients with stable COPD were identified.,There were 240 patients (59.9%) in group A, 122 (30.4%) in group B, 16 (4.0%) in group C, and 23 (5.7%) in group D.,Patients in groups B, C, and D had ORs of 2.95, 3.92, and 5.45, respectively, for risk of exacerbation relative to group A.,Groups C and D experienced exacerbations more frequently, including exacerbations leading to hospital admission, than groups A and B (both P<0.001) during the 1-year follow-up period.,Patients with a high risk of exacerbation (groups C and D) had a lower body mass index, showed more symptoms, used more respiratory medications, and had more severe airflow limitation than patients at low risk of exacerbation (groups A and B).,Mortality was not different between the high-risk and low-risk groups.,The results of our study provide evidence that the GOLD 2017 classification identifies patients with COPD at risk of exacerbations, including those requiring hospitalization, but has a poor ability to predict mortality.

Poor inhalation techniques are associated with decreased medication delivery and poor disease control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The purpose of this study was to evaluate techniques for using inhaler devices in COPD patients.,A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess patient compliance with correct techniques for using inhaler devices across four regimens, ie, the pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), the pMDI with a spacer, the Accuhaler®, and the Handihaler®.,The percentage of compliance with essential steps of correct device usage for each regimen was recorded without prior notification when COPD patients presented for a routine visit, and 1 month after receiving face-to-face training.,We compared the percentage of compliance between the devices and risk factors related to incorrect techniques using logistic regression analysis.,Percentage of patient compliance with correct techniques was compared between the two visits using the chi-square test.,Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.,A total of 103 COPD patients (mean age 71.2±9.2 years, males 64.1%, low education level 82.5%, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second 51.9±22.5) were evaluated.,Seventy-seven patients (74.8%) performed at least one step incorrectly.,Patients using the Handihaler had the lowest compliance failure (42.5%), and the odds ratio for failure with the other devices compared with the Handihaler were 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-11.8) for the pMDI, 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-8.2) for the pMDI with a spacer, and 2.4 (95% CI 1.1-5.2) for the Accuhaler.,Low education level was the single most important factor related to incorrect technique (adjusted odds ratio 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.4, P=0.022).,Formal training resulted in a statistically significant decrease in percentage of incorrect techniques for all devices and for the pMDI (59.4% vs 48.6%, P<0.001; 72.4% vs 48.3%, P=0.039, respectively).,Inhalation technique in COPD patients without face-to-face training was mostly unsatisfactory, especially in patients with low education levels.,The Handihaler was the inhaler device associated with the lowest technique failure.,Face-to-face inhalation technique training significantly increased technique compliance for the pMDI.

Clinicians are faced with an increasingly difficult choice regarding the optimal bronchodilator for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) given the number of new treatments.,The objective of this study is to evaluate the comparative efficacy of indacaterol 75/150/300 μg once daily (OD), glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD, tiotropium bromide 18 μg/5 μg OD, salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (BID), formoterol 12 μg BID, and placebo for moderate to severe COPD.,Forty randomized controlled trials were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.,Outcomes of interest were trough and post-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score and responders (≥4 points), and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) score and responders (≥1 point) at 6 months.,Indacaterol was associated with a higher trough FEV1 than other active treatments (difference for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus placebo: 152 mL (95% credible interval (CrI): 126, 179); 160 mL (95% CrI: 133, 187)) and the greatest improvement in SGRQ score (difference for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus placebo: -3.9 (95% CrI -5.2, -2.6); -3.6 (95% CrI -4.8, -2.3)).,Glycopyrronium and tiotropium 18 μg resulted in the next best estimates for both outcomes with minor differences (difference for glycopyrronium versus tiotropium for trough FEV1 and SGRQ: 18 mL (95% CrI: -16, 51); -0.55 (95% CrI: -2.04, 0.92).,In terms of trough FEV1 and SGRQ score indacaterol, glycopyrronium, and tiotropium are expected to be the most effective bronchodilators.

Randomised, double-blind, controlled trials are considered the gold standard for evaluating a pharmacological agent, as they minimise any potential bias.,However, it is not always possible to perform double-blind trials, particularly for medications delivered via specific devices, e.g. inhalers.,In such cases, open-label studies can be employed instead.,Methods used to minimise any potential bias introduced by open-label study design include randomisation, crossover study design, and objective measurements of primary efficacy and safety variables.,Concise reviews analysing the effect of blinding procedures of comparator drugs on outcomes in respiratory trials are limited.,Here, we compare data from different chronic obstructive pulmonary disease trials with once-daily indacaterol versus a blinded or non-blinded comparator.,The clinical trial programme for indacaterol, a once-daily, long-acting β2-agonist, used tiotropium as a comparator either in an open-label or blinded fashion.,Data from these studies showed that the effects of tiotropium were consistent for forced expiratory volume in 1 second, an objective measure, across blinded and non-blinded studies.,The data were consistent with previous studies of double-blind tiotropium, suggesting that the open-label use of tiotropium did not introduce treatment bias.,The effect of tiotropium on subjective measures (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; transition dyspnoea index) varied slightly across blinded and non-blinded studies, indicating that minimal bias was introduced by using open-label tiotropium.,Importantly, the studies used randomised, open-label tiotropium patients to treatment allocation, a method shown to minimise bias to a greater degree than blinding.,In conclusion, it is important when reporting a clinical trial to be transparent about who was blinded and how the blinding was performed; if the design is open-label, additional efforts must be made to minimise risk of bias.,If these recommendations are followed, and the data are considered in the full knowledge of any potential sources of bias, results with tiotropium suggest that data from open-label studies can provide valuable and credible evidence of the effects of therapy.

COPDPredict™ is a novel digital application dedicated to providing early warning of imminent COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) exacerbations for prompt intervention.,Exacerbation prediction algorithms are based on a decision tree model constructed from percentage thresholds for disease state changes in patient-reported wellbeing, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.,Our study determined the validity of COPDPredict™ to identify exacerbations and provide timely notifications to patients and clinicians compared to clinician-defined episodes.,In a 6-month prospective observational study, 90 patients with COPD and frequent exacerbations registered wellbeing self-assessments daily using COPDPredict™ App and measured FEV1 using connected spirometers.,CRP was measured using finger-prick testing.,Wellbeing self-assessment submissions showed 98% compliance.,Ten patients did not experience exacerbations and treatment was unchanged.,A total of 112 clinician-defined exacerbations were identified in the remaining 80 patients: 52 experienced 1 exacerbation; 28 had 2.2±0.4 episodes.,Sixty-two patients self-managed using prescribed rescue medication.,In 14 patients, exacerbations were more severe but responded to timely escalated treatment at home.,Four patients attended the emergency room; with 2 hospitalised for <72 hours.,Compared to the 6 months pre-COPDPredict™, hospitalisations were reduced by 98% (90 vs 2, p<0.001).,COPDPredict™ identified COPD-related exacerbations at 7, 3 days (median, IQR) prior to clinician-defined episodes, sending appropriate alerts to patients and clinicians.,Cross-tabulation demonstrated sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI 95.7-99.2), specificity of 84.0% (95% CI 82.6-85.3), positive and negative predictive value of 38.4% (95% CI 36.4-40.4) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.5-99.9), respectively.,High sensitivity indicates that if there is an exacerbation, COPDPredict™ informs patients and clinicians accurately.,The high negative predictive value implies that when an exacerbation is not indicated by COPDPredict™, risk of an exacerbation is low.,Thus, COPDPredict™ provides safe, personalised, preventative care for patients with COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airway inflammation and episodes of worsening respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function, termed acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD).,AECOPD episodes are associated with heightened airway inflammation and are often triggered by infection.,A subset of COPD patients develops frequent exacerbations despite maximal existing standard medical therapy.,It is therefore clear that a targeted and more effective prevention strategy is needed.,Immunoglobulins are glycoprotein molecules that are secreted by B lymphocytes and plasma cells and play a critical role in the adaptive immune response against many pathogens.,Altered serum immunoglobulin levels have been observed in patients with immunodeficiencies and inflammatory diseases.,Serum immunoglobulin has also been identified as potential biomarkers of AECOPD frequency.,Since plasma-derived polyvalent immunoglobulin treatment is effective in preventing recurrent infections in immunodeficient patients and in suppressing inflammation in many inflammatory diseases, it may be conceivable that immunoglobulin treatment may be effective in preventing recurrent AECOPD.,In this article, we provide a review of the current knowledge on immunoglobulin treatment in patients with COPD and discuss plausible mechanisms as to how immunoglobulin treatment may work to reduce AECOPD frequency.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations account for a substantial proportion of COPD-related costs.,To describe COPD exacerbation patterns and assess the association between exacerbation frequency and health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with COPD in a Medicare population.,A retrospective cohort study utilizing data from a large US national health plan was conducted including patients with a COPD diagnosis during January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2012, aged 40-89 years and continuously enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan.,Exacerbation frequency, HCRU, and costs were assessed during a 24-month period following the first COPD diagnosis (follow-up period).,Four cohorts were created based on exacerbation frequency (zero, one, two, and ≥three).,HCRU and costs were compared among the four cohorts using chi-square tests and analysis of variance, respectively.,A trend analysis was performed to assess the association between exacerbation frequency and costs using generalized linear models.,Of the included 52,459 patients, 44.3% had at least one exacerbation; 26.3%, 9.5%, and 8.5% had one, two, and ≥three exacerbations in the 24-month follow-up period, respectively.,HCRU was significantly different among cohorts (all P<0.001).,In patients with zero, one, two, and ≥three exacerbations, the percentages of patients experiencing all-cause hospitalizations were 49.7%, 66.4%, 69.7%, and 77.8%, respectively, and those experiencing COPD-related hospitalizations were 0%, 40.4%, 48.1%, and 60.5%, respectively.,Mean all-cause total costs (medical and pharmacy) were more than twofold greater in patients with ≥three exacerbations compared to patients with zero exacerbations ($27,133 vs $56,033; P<0.001), whereas a greater than sevenfold difference was observed in mean COPD-related total costs ($1,605 vs $12,257; P<0.001).,COPD patients frequently experience exacerbations.,Increasing exacerbation frequency is associated with a multiplicative increase in all-cause and COPD-related costs.,This underscores the importance of identifying COPD patients at risk of having frequent exacerbations for appropriate disease management.

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) lead to significant increases in resource utilization and cost to the health care system.,COPD patients with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations pose an additional burden to the system.,This study examined health care utilization and cost among these patients.,For this retrospective analysis, data were extracted from a large national health plan with a predominantly Medicare population.,This study involved patients who were aged 40-89 years, had been enrolled continuously for 24 months or more, had at least two separate insurance claims for COPD with chronic bronchitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 491.xx), and had pharmacy claims for COPD maintenance medications between January 1, 2007, and March 31, 2009.,Two years of data were examined for each patient; the index date was defined as the first occurrence of COPD.,Baseline characteristics were obtained from the first year of data, with health outcomes tracked in the second year.,Severe exacerbation was defined by COPD-related hospitalization or death; moderate exacerbation was defined by oral or parenteral corticosteroid use.,Adjusted numbers of exacerbations and COPD-related costs per patient were estimated controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics.,The final study sample involved 8554 patients; mean age was 70.1 ± 8.6 years and 49.8% of the overall population had exacerbation, 13.9% had a severe exacerbation only, 29.1% had a moderate exacerbation only, and 6.8% had both a severe and moderate exacerbation.,COPD-related mean annual costs were $4069 (all figures given in US dollars) for the overall population and $6381 for patients with two or more exacerbations.,All-cause health care costs were $18,976 for the overall population and $23,901 for patients with history of two or more exacerbations.,Severity of exacerbations, presence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and long-term oxygen use were associated with higher adjusted costs.,The results indicate that despite treatment with maintenance medications, COPD patients continue to have exacerbations resulting in higher costs.,New medications and disease management interventions are warranted to reduce the severity and frequency of exacerbations and the related cost impact of the disease.

Thrombocytosis has been associated with COPD prevalence and increased all-cause mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD); but whether it is associated with morbidity in stable COPD is unknown.,This study aims to determine the association of thrombocytosis with COPD morbidity including reported AECOPD, respiratory symptoms and exercise capacity.,Participants with COPD were included from two multi-center observational studies (SPIROMICS and COPDGene).,Cross-sectional associations of thrombocytosis (platelet count ≥350 × 109/L) with AECOPD during prior year (none vs. any), exertional dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥ 2), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score ≥ 10, six-minute-walk distance (6MWD), and St.,George Respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) were modeled using multivariable logistic or linear regression.,A pooled effect estimate for thrombocytosis was produced using meta-analysis of data from both studies.,Thrombocytosis was present in 124/1820 (6.8%) SPIROMICS participants and 111/2185 (5.1%) COPDGene participants.,In meta-analysis thrombocytosis was associated with any AECOPD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.1-2.0), severe AECOPD (aOR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.2), dyspnea (mMRC ≥ 2 aOR 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-1.9), respiratory symptoms (CAT ≥ 10 aOR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.4), and higher SGRQ score (β 2.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 5).,Thrombocytosis was also associated with classification into Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group D (aOR 1.7 95% CI: 1.2-2.4).,Thrombocytosis was associated with higher likelihood of prior exacerbation and worse symptoms.,Platelet count, a commonly measured clinical assay, may be a biomarker for moderate-severe COPD symptoms, guide disease classification and intensity of treatment.,Future longitudinal studies investigating the role of platelets in COPD progression may be warranted.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01969344 (SPIROMICS) and NCT00608764 (COPDGene).

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events that carry significant consequences for patients.,Some patients experience frequent exacerbations, and are now recognized as a distinct clinical subgroup, the ‘frequent exacerbator’ phenotype.,This is relatively stable over time, occurs across disease severity, and is associated with poorer health outcomes.,These patients are therefore a priority for research and treatment.,The pathophysiology underlying the frequent exacerbator phenotype is complex, with increased airway and systemic inflammation, dynamic lung hyperinflation, changes in lower airway bacterial colonization and a possible increased susceptibility to viral infection.,Frequent exacerbators are also at increased risk from comorbid extrapulmonary diseases including cardiovascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux, depression, osteoporosis and cognitive impairment.,Overall these patients have poorer health status, accelerated forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV1) decline, worsened quality of life, and increased hospital admissions and mortality, contributing to increased exacerbation susceptibility and perpetuation of the frequent exacerbator phenotype.,This review article sets out the definition and importance of the frequent exacerbator phenotype, with a detailed examination of its pathophysiology, impact and interaction with other comorbidities.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-181) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Some large population-based studies have reported a dose-related increased risk of cataracts and glaucoma associated with use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We evaluated the association between use of ICS-containing products, specifically fluticasone propionate/salmeterol fixed-dose combination (FSC), and incidence of cataracts and glaucoma among patients with COPD in a large electronic medical record database in the United Kingdom.,We identified a cohort of patients aged 45 years and over with COPD in the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) between 2003 and 2006.,Cases of incident cataracts or glaucoma were defined based on diagnosis and procedure codes and matched to controls from the risk set to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).,The association with FSC or ICS exposure was modeled using conditional logistic regression.,Medication exposure was assessed with respect to recency, duration, and number of prescriptions prior to the index date.,Average daily dose was defined as none, low (1-250 mcg), medium (251-500 mcg), high (501-1000 mcg), or very high (1001+ mcg) using fluticasone propionate (FP) equivalents.,We identified 2941 incident cataract cases and 327 incident glaucoma cases in the COPD cohort (n = 53,191).,FSC or ICS prescriptions were not associated with risk of incident cataracts or glaucoma for any exposure category, after adjusting for confounders.,We observed a lack of a dose response in all analyses, where low dose was the reference group.,The odds of cataracts associated with FSC dose were medium OR: 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9-1.4); high OR: 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9-1.5); and very high OR: 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9-1.7).,The odds of glaucoma associated with FSC dose: medium OR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5-2.1); high OR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5-2.0); and very high OR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.4-2.8).,FSC or other ICS exposure was not associated with an increased odds of cataracts or glaucoma, nor was a dose-response relationship observed in this population-based nested case-control study of COPD patients in the United Kingdom.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce COPD exacerbation frequency and slow decline in health related quality of life but have little effect on lung function, do not reduce mortality, and increase the risk of pneumonia.,We systematically reviewed trials in which ICS have been withdrawn from patients with COPD, with the aim of determining the effect of withdrawal, understanding the differing results between trials, and making recommendations for improving methodology in future trials where medication is withdrawn.,Trials were identified by two independent reviewers using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, citations of identified studies were checked, and experts contacted to identify further studies.,Data extraction was completed independently by two reviewers.,The methodological quality of each trial was determined by assessing possible sources of systematic bias as recommended by the Cochrane collaboration.,We included four trials; the quality of three was adequate.,In all trials, outcomes were generally worse for patients who had had ICS withdrawn, but differences between outcomes for these patients and patients who continued with medication were mostly small and not statistically significant.,Due to data paucity we performed only one meta-analysis; this indicated that patients who had had medication withdrawn were 1.11 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.46) times more likely to have an exacerbation in the following year, but the definition of exacerbations was not consistent between the three trials, and the impact of withdrawal was smaller in recent trials which were also trials conducted under conditions that reflected routine practice.,There is no evidence from this review that withdrawing ICS in routine practice results in important deterioration in patient outcomes.,Furthermore, the extent of increase in exacerbations depends on the way exacerbations are defined and managed and may depend on the use of other medication.,In trials where medication is withdrawn, investigators should report other medication use, definitions of exacerbations and management of patients clearly.,Intention to treat analyses should be used and interpreted appropriately.

We performed a review of studies of fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) (combination inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)) in patients with COPD, which measured baseline (pretreatment) blood eosinophil levels, to test whether blood eosinophil levels ≥2% were associated with a greater reduction in exacerbation rates with ICS therapy.,Three studies of ≥1-year duration met the inclusion criteria.,Moderate and severe exacerbation rates were analysed according to baseline blood eosinophil levels (<2% vs ≥2%).,At baseline, 57-75% of patients had ≥2% blood eosinophils.,Changes in FEV1 and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were compared by eosinophil level.,For patients with ≥2% eosinophils, FP/SAL was associated with significant reductions in exacerbation rates versus tiotropium (INSPIRE: n=719, rate ratio (RR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92, p=0.006) and versus placebo (TRISTAN: n=1049, RR=0.63, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.79, p<0.001).,No significant difference was seen in the <2% eosinophil subgroup in either study (INSPIRE: n=550, RR=1.18, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.51, p=0.186; TRISTAN: n=354, RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.47, p=0.957, respectively).,In SCO30002 (n=373), no significant effects were observed (FP or FP/SAL vs placebo).,No relationship was observed in any study between eosinophil subgroup and treatment effect on FEV1 and SGRQ.,Baseline blood eosinophil levels may represent an informative marker for exacerbation reduction with ICS/LABA in patients with COPD and a history of moderate/severe exacerbations.

Mucolytics can improve disease outcome in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).,The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of erdosteine (ER), a mucolytic agent with antioxidant activity, on systemic inflammation, symptoms, recurrence of exacerbation, and time to first exacerbation postdischarge in hospitalized patients with AECOPD.,Patients admitted to hospital with AECOPD were randomized to receive either ER 900 mg daily (n=20) or a matching control (n=20).,Treatment was continued for 10 days until discharge.,Patients also received standard treatment with steroids, nebulized bronchodilators, and antibiotics as appropriate.,Serum C-reactive protein levels, lung function, and breathlessness-cough-sputum scale were measured on hospital admission and thereafter at days 10 and 30 posttreatment.,Recurrence of AECOPD-requiring antibiotics and/or oral steroids and time to first exacerbation in the 2 months (days 30 and 60) postdischarge were also assessed.,Mean serum C-reactive protein levels were lower in both groups at days 10 and 30, compared with those on admission, with significantly lower levels in the ER group at day 10.,Improvements in symptom score and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were greater in the ER than the control group, which reached statistical significance on day 10.,ER was associated with a 39% lower risk of exacerbations and a significant delay in time to first exacerbation (log-rank test P=0.009 and 0.075 at days 30 and 60, respectively) compared with controls.,Results confirm that the addition of ER (900 mg/d) to standard treatment improves outcomes in patients with AECOPD.,ER significantly reduced airway inflammation, improved the symptoms of AECOPD, and prolonged time to first exacerbation.,The authors suggest ER could be most beneficial in patients with recurring, prolonged, and/or severe exacerbations of COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.,Trials of maintenance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatments focus on improvement in lung function and reductions in exacerbations, while patients are much more concerned about symptoms and health status.,Our aim was to investigate the effects of tiotropium + olodaterol on patient-reported health outcomes, breathlessness and night-time rescue medication use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, compared to placebo, tiotropium or olodaterol monotherapy.,Two pairs of replicate, phase III studies of 12 (OTEMTO 1 + 2) and 52 weeks’ (TONADO 1 + 2) duration were evaluated, in which patients received either tiotropium + olodaterol 2.5/5 or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 or 5 μg, olodaterol 5 μg or placebo, all delivered once daily via Respimat inhaler.,Patient-reported outcomes included breathlessness assessed by transition dyspnoea index focal score, health status assessed by St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score and night-time rescue medication use at 12 or 24 weeks.,Outcomes from the pooled study data are reported.,Overall, 1621 and 5162 patients were treated in the OTEMTO and TONADO trials, respectively.,Significantly larger improvements in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and transition dyspnoea index focal scores were observed and a greater proportion of patients were responders to therapy (based on minimum clinically important differences in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and transition dyspnoea index) with tiotropium + olodaterol compared to either monotherapy or to placebo.,Tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg significantly reduced night-time rescue medication usage.,Results from four in-depth studies show that a combined inhaler is very effective for treatment of moderate to severe chronic lung disease.,Alleviating the symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly sleep disturbance, is crucial to enhancing patients’ quality of life.,Gary Ferguson at the Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, together with other scientists across the USA and Germany, analysed data from four large-scale studies to evaluate the efficacy of STIOLTO Respimat, a combination of two bronchodilators-tiotropium, and olodaterol, which tackle airway obstruction and breathlessness, improving long-term lung function.,They found that the new drug combination triggered significant improvements in patients’ quality of life and levels of breathlessness.,Use of night-time rescue medication in patients on STIOLTO Respimat was considerably reduced.,A greater number of patients responded positively to the combined inhaler than to monotherapy.

Addition of a second bronchodilator from a different pharmacological class may benefit patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) whose symptoms are insufficiently controlled by bronchodilator monotherapy.,GLOW6 evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily coadministration of the long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol (IND) and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium (GLY) versus IND alone in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,In this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, 12-week study, patients were randomized 1:1 to IND 150 μg and GLY 50 μg daily (IND + GLY) or IND 150 μg daily and placebo (IND + PBO) (all delivered via separate Breezhaler® devices).,The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of IND + GLY versus IND + PBO for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 12.,Other end points included trough FEV1 at day 1, FEV1 area under the curve from 30 minutes to 4 hours (AUC30min-4h), peak FEV1, inspiratory capacity and trough forced vital capacity (FVC) at day 1 and week 12, and transition dyspnea index (TDI) focal score, COPD symptoms, and rescue medication use over 12 weeks.,A total of 449 patients were randomized (IND + GLY, 226; IND + PBO, 223); 94% completed the study.,On day 1 and at week 12, IND + GLY significantly improved trough FEV1 versus IND + PBO, with treatment differences of 74 mL (95% CI 46-101 mL) and 64 mL (95% CI 28-99 mL), respectively (both P<0.001).,IND + GLY significantly improved postdose peak FEV1, FEV1 AUC30min-4h, and trough FVC at day 1 and week 12 versus IND + PBO (all P<0.01).,TDI focal score and COPD symptoms (percentage of days able to perform usual daily activities and change from baseline in mean daytime respiratory score) were significantly improved with IND + GLY versus IND + PBO (P<0.05).,The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two treatment groups.,In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, once-daily coadministration of IND and GLY provides significant and sustained improvement in bronchodilation versus IND alone from day 1, with significant improvements in patient-centered outcomes.

Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend limiting the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to patients with more severe disease and/or increased exacerbation risk.,However, there are discrepancies between guidelines and real-life practice, as ICS are being overprescribed.,In light of the increasing concerns about the clinical benefit and long-term risks associated with ICS use, therapy needs to be carefully weighed on a case-by-case basis, including in patients already on ICS.,Several studies sought out to determine the effects of withdrawing ICS in patients with COPD.,Early studies have deterred clinicians from reducing ICS in patients with COPD as they reported that an abrupt withdrawal of ICS precipitates exacerbations, and results in a deterioration in lung function and symptoms.,However, these studies were fraught with numerous methodological limitations.,Recently, two randomized controlled trials and a real-life prospective study revealed that ICS can be safely withdrawn in certain patients.,Of these, the WISDOM (Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids During Optimized Bronchodilator Management) trial was the largest and first to examine stepwise withdrawal of ICS in patients with COPD receiving maintenance therapy of long-acting bronchodilators (ie, tiotropium and salmeterol).,Even with therapy being in line with the current guidelines, the findings of the WISDOM trial indicate that not all patients benefit from including ICS in their treatment regimen.,Indeed, only certain COPD phenotypes seem to benefit from ICS therapy, and validated markers that predict ICS response are urgently warranted in clinical practice.,Furthermore, we are now better equipped with a larger armamentarium of novel and more effective long-acting β2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations that can be considered by clinicians to optimize bronchodilation and allow for safer ICS withdrawal.,In addition to providing a review of the aforementioned, this perspective article proposes an algorithm for the stepwise withdrawal of ICS in real-life clinical practice.

The GOLD classification of COPD severity introduces a stage 0 (at risk) comprising individuals with productive cough and normal lung function.,The aims of this study were to investigate total mortality risks in GOLD stages 0-4 with special focus on stage 0, and furthermore to assess the influence of symptoms of chronic bronchitis on mortality risks in GOLD stages 1-4.,Between 1974 and 1992, a total of 22 044 middle-aged individuals participated in a health screening, which included a spirometry as well as recording of respiratory symptoms and smoking habits.,Individuals with comorbidity at baseline (diabetes, stroke, cancer, angina pectoris, or heart infarction) were excluded from the analyses.,Hazard ratios (HR 95% CI) of total mortality were analyzed in GOLD stages 0-4 with individuals with normal lung function and without symptoms of chronic bronchitis as a reference group.,HR:s in smoking individuals with symptoms of chronic bronchitis within the stages 1-4 were calculated with individuals with the same GOLD stage but without symptoms of chronic bronchitis as reference.,The number of deaths was 3674 for men and 832 for women based on 352 324 and 150 050 person-years respectively.,The proportion of smokers among men was 50% and among women 40%.,Self reported comorbidity was present in 4.6% of the men and 6.6% of the women.,Among smoking men, Stage 0 was associated with an increased mortality risk, HR; 1.65 (1.32-2.08), of similar magnitude as in stage 2, HR; 1.41 (1.31-1.70).,The hazard ratio in stage 0 was significantly higher than in stage 1 HR; 1.13 (0.98-1.29).,Among male smokers with stage 1; HR: 2.04 (1.34-3.11), and among female smokers with stage 2 disease; HR: 3.16 (1.38-7.23), increased HR:s were found in individuals with symptoms of chronic bronchitis as compared to those without symptoms of chronic bronchitis.,Symptoms fulfilling the definition of chronic bronchitis were associated with an increased mortality risk among male smokers with normal pulmonary function (stage 0) and also with an increased risk of death among smoking individuals with mild to moderate COPD (stage 1 and 2).

Background: Blood eosinophils may predict response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) where ICS is recommended in patients at high risk of exacerbations.,The proportion of patients who may benefit the most from ICS-based therapy was quantified in a real-world population.,Materials and methods: European data from the Adelphi Real World Respiratory Disease Specific Programme™ 2017 survey were collected from consecutive COPD patients by participating physicians.,Overall, 1,528 patients were assessable for Global Initiative for COPD (GOLD) 2017 status and were included in the analysis.,Results: More GOLD D patients had elevated eosinophil counts compared with GOLD B.,The proportions of GOLD D patients with a history of ≥2 exacerbations and eosinophil counts of ≥150, ≥300, and ≥400 cells/µL were 81.2%, 39.4%, and 24.6%, respectively.,In total, 10.6% of the patients had ≥300 eosinophils/µL and a history of ≥2 exacerbations.,ICS-based therapy was received by 41.5% of GOLD B and 68.0% of GOLD D patients.,Conclusion: There was no apparent relation between ICS use and eosinophil blood count.,There are differences in the distributions of patients with frequent exacerbations and/or high blood eosinophil counts and the use of ICS in COPD.,These data may provide information for the implementation of future treatment recommendations.

This cohort study of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was performed to evaluate the status of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) prescriptions following the 2017 revision of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.,A total of 1144 patients from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease and Korea Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorders Subgroup Study cohorts, with final follow-up visits completed between 2017 and 2018, were analyzed.,Features indicative of ICS usage were as follows: a history of asthma, blood eosinophils of ≥300 cells/μl, or ≥ 2 exacerbations in the year prior to enrollment.,Among baseline ICS users, we compared annual total and severe exacerbation rates, based on ICS continuation or withdrawal.,ICS-containing regimens were prescribed to 46.3% of the enrolled of patients in 2014; this decreased to 38.8% in 2017, and long-acting dual bronchodilators were used instead.,Among ICS users in 2017, 47.5% did not exhibit features indicative of ICS usage; 478 used ICS at baseline, and ICS was withdrawn in 77 (16.1%) during the study period.,The proportion of patients with asthma and the baseline annual exacerbation rate were greater in the ICS withdrawal groinup than in the ICS continued group (56.6% vs. 41%, p = 0.01; 0.79 vs.,0.53, p < 0.001).,Annual exacerbation rates during the follow-up period were similar between the ICS-withdrawal and ICS -continued groups (0.48 vs.,0.47, p = 0.84); however, former exhibited a significantly higher rate of severe exacerbation (0.22 vs.,0.12, p = 0.03).,Prescriptions of ICS to treat COPD decreased with increased use of long-acting dual bronchodilators.,ICS withdrawal might impact severe exacerbation; the potential risks and benefits of withdrawing ICS should therefore be considered based on patients’ characteristics.

Natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is punctuated by exacerbations; however, little is known about prognosis of the first-ever COPD exacerbation and variables predicting its outcomes.,A population-based cohort study among COPD patients with their first-ever exacerbations requiring hospitalizations was conducted.,Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality after discharge.,Demographics, comorbidities, medications and in-hospital events were obtained to explore outcome predictors.,The cohort comprised 4204 hospitalized COPD patients, of whom 175 (4%) died during the hospitalization.,In-hospital mortality was related to higher age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.06) and Charlson comorbidity index score (OR: 1.08 per point; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15); angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.98) and β blockers (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.95) conferred a survival benefit.,At one year after discharge, 22% (871/4029) of hospital survivors were dead.,On multivariate Cox regression analysis, age and Charlson comorbidity index remained independent predictors of one-year mortality.,Longer hospital stay (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 per day; 95% CI: 1.01-1.01) and ICU admission (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03-1.73) during the hospitalization were associated with higher mortality risks.,Prescription of β blockers (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67-0.93) and statins (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47-0.91) on hospital discharge were protective against one-year mortality.,Even the first-ever severe COPD exacerbation signifies poor prognosis in COPD patients.,Comorbidities play a crucial role in determining outcomes and should be carefully assessed.,Angiotensin II receptor blockers, β blockers and statins may, in theory, have dual cardiopulmonary protective properties and probably alter prognosis of COPD patients.,Nevertheless, the limitations inherent to a claims database study, such as the diagnostic accuracy of COPD and its exacerbation, should be born in mind.

The long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in terms of successive severe exacerbations and mortality is unknown.,The authors formed an inception cohort of patients from their first ever hospitalisation for COPD during 1990-2005, using the healthcare databases from the province of Quebec, Canada.,Patients were followed until death or 31 March 2007, and all COPD hospitalisations occurring during follow-up were identified.,The hazard functions of successive hospitalised COPD exacerbations and all-cause mortality over time were estimated, and HRs adjusted for age, sex, calendar time and comorbidity.,The cohort included 73 106 patients hospitalised for the first time for COPD, of whom 50 580 died during the 17-year follow-up, with 50% and 75% mortality at 3.6 and 7.7 years respectively.,The median time from the first to the second hospitalised exacerbation was around 5 years and decreased to <4 months from the 9th to the 10th.,The risk of the subsequent severe exacerbation was increased threefold after the second severe exacerbation and 24-fold after the 10th, relative to the first.,Mortality after a severe exacerbation peaked to 40 deaths per 10 000 per day in the first week after admission, dropping gradually to 5 after 3 months.,The course of COPD involves a rapid decline in health status after the second severe exacerbation and high mortality in the weeks following every severe exacerbation.,Two strategic targets for COPD management should include delaying the second severe exacerbation and improving treatment of severe exacerbations to reduce their excessive early mortality.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have multiple underlying comorbidities, which may lead to increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs.,To describe the comorbidity profiles of COPD patients and examine the associations between the presence of comorbidities and HCRU or health care costs.,A retrospective cohort study utilizing data from a large US national health plan with a predominantly Medicare population was conducted.,COPD patients aged 40-89 years and continuously enrolled for 12 months prior to and 24 months after the first COPD diagnosis during the period of January 01, 2009, through December 31, 2010, were selected.,Eleven comorbidities of interest were identified 12 months prior through 12 months after COPD diagnosis.,All-cause and COPD-related hospitalizations and costs were assessed 24 months after diagnosis, and the associations with comorbidities were determined using multivariate statistical models.,Ninety-two percent of 52,643 COPD patients identified had at least one of the 11 comorbidities.,Congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease (CVA) had the strongest associations with all-cause hospitalizations (mean ratio: 1.56, 1.32, and 1.30, respectively; P<0.0001); other comorbidities examined had moderate associations.,CHF, anxiety, and sleep apnea had the strongest associations with COPD-related hospitalizations (mean ratio: 2.01, 1.32, and 1.21, respectively; P<0.0001); other comorbidities examined (except chronic kidney disease [CKD], obesity, and osteoarthritis) had moderate associations.,All comorbidities assessed (except obesity and CKD) were associated with higher all-cause costs (mean ratio range: 1.07-1.54, P<0.0001).,CHF, sleep apnea, anxiety, and osteoporosis were associated with higher COPD-related costs (mean ratio range: 1.08-1.67, P<0.0001), while CVA, CKD, obesity, osteoarthritis, and type 2 diabetes were associated with lower COPD-related costs.,This study confirms that specific comorbidities among COPD patients add significant burden with higher HCRU and costs compared to patients without these comorbidities.,Payers may use this information to develop tailored therapeutic interventions for improved management of patients with specific comorbidities.

Exacerbations affect morbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We sought to evaluate the association between exacerbation frequency and spirometric and health status changes over time using data from a large, long-term trial.,This retrospective analysis of data from the 4-year UPLIFT® (Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium) trial compared tiotropium with placebo.,Annualized rates of decline and estimated mean differences at each time point were analyzed using a mixed-effects model according to subgroups based on exacerbation frequency (events per patient-year: 0, >0-1, >1-2, and >2).,Spirometry and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were performed at baseline and every 6 months (also at one month for spirometry).,In total, 5992 patients (mean age 65 years, 75% male) were randomized.,Higher exacerbation frequency was associated with lower baseline postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (1.40, 1.36, 1.26, and 1.14 L) and worsening SGRQ scores (43.7, 44.1, 47.8, and 52.4 units).,Corresponding rates of decline in postbronchodilator FEV1 (mL/year) were 40, 41, 43, and 48 (control), and 34, 38, 48, and 49 (tiotropium).,Values for postbronchodilator forced vital capacity decline (mL/year) were 45, 56, 74, and 83 (control), and 43, 57, 83, and 95 (tiotropium).,The rates of worsening in total SGRQ score (units/year) were 0.72, 1.16, 1.44, and 1.99 (control), and 0.38, 1.29, 1.68, and 2.86 (tiotropium).,The proportion of patients who died (intention-to-treat analysis until four years [1440 days]) for the entire cohort increased with increasing frequency of hospitalized exacerbations.,Increasing frequency of exacerbations worsens the rate of decline in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.,Increasing rates of hospitalized exacerbations are associated with increasing risk of death.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of respiratory mortality worldwide.,Genetic risk loci provide novel insights into disease pathogenesis.,We performed a genome-wide association study in 35,735 cases and 222,076 controls from the UK Biobank and additional studies from the International COPD Genetics Consortium.,We identified 82 loci with P-value < 5 × 10−8; 47 were previously described in association with either COPD or population-based lung function.,Of the remaining 35 novel loci, 13 were associated with lung function in 79,055 individuals from the SpiroMeta consortium.,Using gene expression and regulation data, we identified enrichment for loci in lung tissue, smooth muscle and several lung cell types.,We found 14 COPD loci shared with either asthma or pulmonary fibrosis.,COPD genetic risk loci clustered into groups of quantitative imaging features and comorbidity associations.,Our analyses provide further support to the genetic susceptibility and heterogeneity of COPD.

Reduced lung function predicts mortality and is key to the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,In a genome-wide association study in 400,102 individuals of European ancestry, we define 279 lung function signals, 139 of which are new.,In combination, these variants strongly predict COPD in independent patient populations.,Furthermore, the combined effect of these variants showed generalizability across smokers and never-smokers, and across ancestral groups.,We highlight biological pathways, known and potential drug targets for COPD and, in phenome-wide association studies, autoimmune-related and other pleiotropic effects of lung function associated variants.,This new genetic evidence has potential to improve future preventive and therapeutic strategies for COPD.

Assessments of lung function, exacerbations and health status are common measures of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) progression and treatment response in clinical trials.,We hypothesised that a composite endpoint could more holistically assess clinically important deterioration (CID) in a COPD clinical trial setting.,A composite endpoint was tested in a post hoc analysis of 5652 patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2-4 COPD from the 4-year UPLIFT study.,Patients received tiotropium 18 μg or placebo.,The composite endpoint included time to first confirmed decrease in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥100 mL, confirmed increase in St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score ≥ 4 units, or moderate/severe exacerbation.,Most patients (> 80%) experienced CID, with similar incidence among GOLD subgroups.,Most confirmed trough FEV1 (74.6-81.6%) and SGRQ (72.3-78.1%) deteriorations were sustained across the study and in all GOLD subgroups.,Patients with CID more frequently experienced subsequent exacerbation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67, 1.92) or death (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.06, 1.39) by Month 6.,CID was responsive to bronchodilator treatment.,Composite endpoints provide additional information on COPD progression and treatment effects in clinical trials.,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00144339.

Current pharmacological therapies for COPD improve quality of life and symptoms and reduce exacerbations.,Given the progressive nature of COPD, it is arguably more important to understand whether the available therapies are able to delay clinical deterioration; the concept of “clinically important deterioration” (CID) has therefore been developed.,We evaluated the efficacy of the single-inhaler triple combination beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, and glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G), using data from three large 1-year studies.,The studies compared BDP/FF/G to BDP/FF (TRILOGY), tiotropium (TRINITY), and indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY; TRIBUTE).,All studies recruited patients with symptomatic COPD, FEV1 <50%, and an exacerbation history.,We measured the time to first CID and to sustained CID, an endpoint combining FEV1, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), moderate-to-severe exacerbations, and death.,The time to first CID was based on the first occurrence of any of the following: a decrease of ≥100 mL from baseline in FEV1, an increase of ≥4 units from baseline in SGRQ total score, the occurrence of a moderate/severe COPD exacerbation, or death.,The time to sustained CID was defined as: a CID in FEV1 and/or SGRQ total score maintained at all subsequent visits, an exacerbation, or death.,Extrafine BDP/FF/G significantly extended the time to first CID vs BDP/FF (HR 0.61, P<0.001), tiotropium (0.72, P<0.001), and IND/GLY (0.82, P<0.001), and significantly extended the time to sustained CID vs BDP/FF (HR 0.64, P<0.001) and tiotropium (0.80, P<0.001), with a numerical extension vs IND/GLY.,In patients with symptomatic COPD, FEV1 <50%, and an exacerbation history, extrafine BDP/FF/G delayed disease deterioration compared with BDP/FF, tiotropium, and IND/GLY.,The studies are registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: TRILOGY, NCT01917331; TRINITY, NCT01911364; TRIBUTE, NCT02579850.

Physicians do not routinely recommend smokers to undergo spirometry unless they are symptomatic.,To test the hypothesis that there are a significant number of asymptomatic smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we estimated the prevalence of COPD in a group of asymptomatic smokers.,Two thousand nine hundred and sixty-one smokers with a cumulative consumption history of at least 10 pack-years, either smokers with symptoms or smokers without symptoms (WOS) were invited to perform a spirometry and complete a symptom questionnaire.,Six hundred and thirty-seven (21.5%) smokers had no symptoms, whereas 2,324 (78.5%) had at least one symptom.,The prevalence of COPD in subjects WOS was 1.5% when considering the whole group of smokers (45/2,961) and 7% when considering only the group WOS (45/637).,From 329 smokers with COPD, 13.7% were WOS.,Subjects WOS were younger, had better lung function and lower cumulative consumption of cigarettes, estimated as both cigarettes per day and pack-years.,According to severity of airflow limitation, 69% vs 87% of subjects were classified as Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages I-II in the WOS and smokers with symptoms groups, respectively (P<0.001).,A multivariate analysis showed that forced expiratory volume in 1 second (mL) was the only predictive factor for COPD in asymptomatic smokers.,Prevalence of COPD in asymptomatic smokers is 1.5%.,This number of asymptomatic smokers may be excluded from the benefit of an “early” intervention, not just pharmacological but also from smoking cessation counseling.,The higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second may contribute to prevent early diagnosis.

The Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey aimed to estimate the prevalence and burden of COPD globally and to update findings from the Confronting COPD International Survey conducted in 1999-2000.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in 12 countries worldwide were identified through systematic screening of population samples.,Telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2012 and May 2013 using a structured survey that incorporated validated patient-reported outcome instruments.,Eligible patients were adults aged 40 years and older who were taking regular respiratory medications or suffered with chronic respiratory symptoms and reported either 1) a physician diagnosis of COPD/emphysema, 2) a physician diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, or 3) a symptom-based definition of chronic bronchitis.,The burden of COPD was measured with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale.,Of 106,876 households with at least one person aged ≥40 years, 4,343 respondents fulfilled the case definition of COPD and completed the full survey.,COPD prevalence ranged from 7% to 12%, with most countries falling within the range of 7%-9%.,In all countries, prevalence increased with age, and in all countries except the US was greater among men (range 6%-14%) than among women (range 5%-11%).,A significant disease burden was observed when considering COPD symptoms or health status, and showed wide variations across countries.,Prevalence of moderate-to-severe dyspnea (mMRC scale ≥2) ranged from 27% to 61%, and mean CAT score ranged from 16.0 to 24.8, indicating medium-to-high impairment.,This survey, representing 12 countries, showed similar rates of estimated COPD prevalence across countries that were higher than those reported a decade ago in the original Confronting COPD International Survey.,A significant burden of COPD was demonstrated by symptoms and health care-resource use, similar to that reported in the original survey.

Exposure to cigarette smoking can increase the risk of cancers and cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases.,However, the underlying mechanisms of how smoking contributes to disease risks are not completely understood.,Epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs), mostly in non-Asian populations, have been conducted to identify smoking-associated methylation alterations at individual probes.,There are few data on regional methylation changes in relation to smoking.,Few data link differential methylation in blood to differential gene expression in lung tissue.,We identified 108 significant (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05) differentially methylated probes (DMPs) and 87 significant differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (multiple-testing corrected p < 0.01) in current compared to never smokers from our EWAS of cotinine-validated smoking in blood DNA from a Korean chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohort (n = 100 including 31 current, 30 former, and 39 never smokers) using Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip.,Of the 108 DMPs (FDR < 0.05), nine CpGs were statistically significant based on Bonferroni correction and 93 were novel including five that mapped to loci previously associated with smoking.,Of the 87 DMRs, 66 were mapped to novel loci.,Methylation correlated with urine cotinine levels in current smokers at six DMPs, with pack-years in current smokers at six DMPs, and with duration of smoking cessation in former smokers at eight DMPs.,Of the 143 genes to which our significant DMPs or DMRs annotated, gene expression levels at 20 genes were associated with pack-years in lung tissue transcriptome data of smokers (Asan Biobank, n = 188).,Our study of differential methylation in Koreans confirmed previous findings from non-Asian populations and revealed novel loci in relation to smoking.,Smoking-related differential methylation in blood is associated with gene expression in lung tissue, an important target of adverse health effects of smoking, supporting the potential functional importance of methylation in smoking-related disease.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0266-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cigarette smoke (CS) is the major etiologic factor of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,CS-exposed mice develop emphysema and mild pulmonary inflammation but no airway obstruction, which is also a prominent feature of COPD.,Therefore, CS may interact with other factors, particularly respiratory infections, in the pathogenesis of airway remodeling in COPD.,C57BL/6 mice were exposed to CS for 2 h a day, 5 days a week for 8 weeks.,Mice were also exposed to heat-killed non-typeable H. influenzae (HK-NTHi) on days 7 and 21.,One day after the last exposure to CS, mice were sacrificed and lung inflammation and mechanics, emphysematous changes, and goblet cell metaplasia were assessed.,Mice exposed to CS or HK-NTHi alone or room air served as controls.,To determine the susceptibility to viral infections, we also challenged these mice with rhinovirus (RV).,Unlike mice exposed to CS or HK-NTHi alone, animals exposed to CS/HK-NTHi developed emphysema, lung inflammation and goblet cell metaplasia in both large and small airways.,CS/HK-NTHi-exposed mice also expressed increased levels of mucin genes and cytokines compared to mice in other groups.,CS/HK-NTHi-exposed mice infected with RV demonstrated increased viral persistence, sustained neutrophilia, and further increments in mucin gene and chemokine expression compared to other groups.,These findings indicate that in addition to CS, bacteria may also contribute to development of COPD, particularly changes in airways.,Mice exposed to CS/HK-NTHi are also more susceptible to subsequent viral infection than mice exposed to either CS or HK-NTHi alone.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality and of loss of disability-adjusted life years worldwide.,It often is accompanied by the presence of comorbidity.,To systematically review the influence of COPD comorbidity on generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,A systematic review approach was used to search the databases Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library for studies evaluating the influence of comorbidity on HRQoL in COPD.,Identified studies were analyzed according to study characteristics, generic HRQoL measurement instrument, COPD severity and comorbid HRQoL impact.,Studies using only non-generic instruments were excluded.,25 studies met the selection criteria.,Seven studies utilized the EQ-5D, six studies each used the SF-36 or SF-12.,The remaining studies used one of six other instruments each.,Utilities were calculated by four EQ-5D studies and one 15D study.,Patient populations covered both early and advanced stages of COPD and ranged from populations with mostly stage 1 and 2 to studies with patients classified mainly stage 3 and 4.,Evidence was mainly created for cardiovascular disease, depression and anxiety as well as diabetes but also for quantitative comorbid associations.,Strong evidence is pointing towards the significant negative association of depression and anxiety on reduced HRQoL in COPD patients.,While all studies found the occurrence of specific comorbidities to decrease HRQoL in COPD patients, the orders of magnitude diverged.,Due to different patient populations, different measurement tools and different concomitant diseases the study heterogeneity was high.,Facilitating multimorbid intervention guidance, instead of applying a parsimony based single disease paradigm, should constitute an important goal for improving HRQoL of COPD patients in research and in clinical practice.

To evaluate the influence of heart disease on clinical characteristics, quality of life, use of health resources, and costs of patients with COPD followed at primary care settings under common clinical practice conditions.,Epidemiologic, observational, and descriptive study (EPIDEPOC study).,Patients ≥ 40 years of age with stable COPD attending primary care settings were included.,Demographic, clinical characteristics, quality of life (SF-12), seriousness of the disease, and treatment data were collected.,Results were compared between patients with or without associated heart disease.,A total of 9,390 patients with COPD were examined of whom 1,770 (18.8%) had heart disease and 78% were males.,When comparing both patient groups, significant differences were found in the socio-demographic characteristics, health profile, comorbidities, and severity of the airway obstruction, which was greater in patients with heart disease.,Differences were also found in both components of quality of life, physical and mental, with lower scores among those patients with heart disease.,Higher frequency of primary care and pneumologist visits, emergency-room visits and number of hospital admissions were observed among patients with heart diseases.,The annual total cost per patient was significantly higher in patients with heart disease; 2,937 ± 2,957 vs. 1,749 ± 2,120, p < 0.05.,Variables that were showed to be independently associated to COPD in subjects with hearth conditions were age, being inactive, ex-smokers, moderate physical exercise, body mass index, concomitant blood hypertension, diabetes, anxiety, the SF-12 physical and mental components and per patient per year total cost.,Patients with COPD plus heart disease had greater disease severity and worse quality of life, used more healthcare resources and were associated with greater costs compared to COPD patients without known hearth disease.

To explore the effects of group singing therapy on depression symptoms and quality of life of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Patients with COPD were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 30) and control groups (n = 30).,The intervention group received group singing therapy once a week for 24 sessions along with routine health education, whereas the control group only received the routine health education.,All patients were administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale (HADS-D) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ).,Data were collected at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months.,Fifty-six participants completed this trial.,Significant between-group differences were observed with respect to the main effect of group and time as well as the effect of group × time interaction on HADS-D score.,The HADS-D score was significantly improved 1, 3, 6 months after group singing therapy.,The CCQ total scores were significantly different between the two groups with respect to the main effect of group and time and the group × time interaction effect.,Significantly better CCQ was detected in the intervention group at 3 months and 6 months after intervention.,Group singing therapy reduces depressive symptoms and improves the quality of life of patients with stable COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and farming are two conditions that have been associated with an increased risk of anxiety and depression.,Dairy farming is an independent risk factor for COPD.,To test the hypotheses that the prevalence of anxiety and/or depression is higher in dairy farmers with COPD than in farmers without COPD, and higher in dairy farmers with COPD than in non-farmers with COPD.,Anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in 100 dairy farmers with COPD (DF-COPD), 98 dairy farmers without COPD (DF-controls), 85 non-farming patients with COPD (NF-COPD) and 89 non-farming subjects without COPD (NF-controls), all identified by screening in the Franche-Comté region of France.,Anxiety and depression were considered present when the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score was ≥8.,COPD was defined by a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7.,The crude prevalence of anxiety did not differ between the four groups, ranging from 36% in NF-controls to 47% in NF-COPD (p=0.15 between groups).,Similarly, the prevalence of depression did not differ significantly between the four groups (p=0.16 between groups).,In dairy farmers (n=198), the only factors associated with anxiety were quality of life and current smoking.,Depression in dairy farmers was associated with airflow limitation (lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second and COPD grade 2 or more) as well as with some COPD-related features (dyspnea severity, current smoking, and poorer quality of life).,In non-farmers, both anxiety and depression were associated with airflow limitation and COPD-related features.,In our population, the prevalence of anxiety and/or depression was similar in dairy farmers with and without COPD and in non-farmers with COPD.,Nevertheless, the degree of airway obstruction and some COPD-related features were associated with depression among dairy farmers, whereas these factors were not associated with anxiety.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease of the lungs that is currently the fourth leading cause of death worldwide.,Genetic factors account for only a small amount of COPD risk, but epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, have the potential to mediate the interactions between an individual’s genetics and environmental exposure.,DNA methylation is highly cell type-specific, and individual cell type studies of DNA methylation in COPD are sparse.,Fibroblasts are present within the airway and parenchyma of the lung and contribute to the aberrant deposition of extracellular matrix in COPD.,No assessment or comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in the airway and parenchymal fibroblasts from individuals with and without COPD has been undertaken.,These data provide valuable insight into the molecular mechanisms contributing to COPD and the differing pathologies of small airways disease and emphysema in COPD.,Genome-wide DNA methylation was evaluated at over 485,000 CpG sites using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array in the airway (non-COPD n = 8, COPD n = 7) and parenchymal fibroblasts (non-COPD n = 17, COPD n = 29) isolated from individuals with and without COPD.,Targeted gene expression was assessed by qPCR in matched RNA samples.,Differentially methylated DNA regions were identified between cells isolated from individuals with and without COPD in both airway and parenchymal fibroblasts.,Only in parenchymal fibroblasts was differential DNA methylation associated with differential gene expression.,A second analysis of differential DNA methylation variability identified 359 individual differentially variable CpG sites in parenchymal fibroblasts.,No differentially variable CpG sites were identified in the airway fibroblasts.,Five differentially variable-methylated CpG sites, associated with three genes, were subsequently assessed for gene expression differences.,Two genes (OAT and GRIK2) displayed significantly increased gene expression in cells isolated from individuals with COPD.,Differential and variable DNA methylation was associated with COPD status in the parenchymal fibroblasts but not airway fibroblasts.,Aberrant DNA methylation was associated with altered gene expression imparting biological function to DNA methylation changes.,Changes in DNA methylation are therefore implicated in the molecular mechanisms underlying COPD pathogenesis and may represent novel therapeutic targets.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0464-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Epigenetics changes have been shown to be affected by cigarette smoking.,Cigarette smoke (CS)-mediated DNA methylation can potentially affect several cellular and pathophysiological processes, acute exacerbations, and comorbidity in the lungs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We sought to determine whether genome-wide lung DNA methylation profiles of smokers and patients with COPD were significantly different from non-smokers.,We isolated DNA from parenchymal lung tissues of patients including eight lifelong non-smokers, eight current smokers, and eight patients with COPD and analyzed the samples using Illumina’s Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip.,Our data revealed that the differentially methylated genes were related to top canonical pathways (e.g., G beta gamma signaling, mechanisms of cancer, and nNOS signaling in neurons), disease and disorders (organismal injury and abnormalities, cancer, and respiratory disease), and molecular and cellular functions (cell death and survival, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance) in patients with COPD.,The genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identified suggestive genes, such as NOS1AP, TNFAIP2, BID, GABRB1, ATXN7, and THOC7 with DNA methylation changes in COPD lung tissues that were further validated by pyrosequencing.,Pyrosequencing validation confirmed hyper-methylation in smokers and patients with COPD as compared to non-smokers.,However, we did not detect significant differences in DNA methylation for TNFAIP2, ATXN7, and THOC7 genes in smokers and COPD groups despite the changes observed in the genome-wide analysis.,Our study suggests that DNA methylation in suggestive genes, such as NOS1AP, BID, and GABRB1 may be used as epigenetic signatures in smokers and patients with COPD if the same is validated in a larger cohort.,Future studies are required to correlate DNA methylation status with transcriptomics of selective genes identified in this study and elucidate their role and involvement in the progression of COPD and its exacerbations.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-017-0335-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Current primary care patterns for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) focus on reactive care for acute exacerbations, often neglecting ongoing COPD management to the detriment of patient experience and outcomes.,Proactive diagnosis and ongoing multifactorial COPD management, comprising smoking cessation, influenza and pneumonia vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation, and symptomatic and maintenance pharmacotherapy according to severity, can significantly improve a patient’s health-related quality of life, reduce exacerbations and their consequences, and alleviate the functional, utilization, and financial burden of COPD.,Redesign of primary care according to principles of the chronic care model, which is implemented in the patient-centered medical home, can shift COPD management from acute rescue to proactive maintenance.,The chronic care model and patient-centered medical home combine delivery system redesign, clinical information systems, decision support, and self-management support within a practice, linked with health care organization and community resources beyond the practice.,COPD care programs implementing two or more chronic care model components effectively reduce emergency room and inpatient utilization.,This review guides primary care practices in improving COPD care workflows, highlighting the contributions of multidisciplinary collaborative team care, care coordination, and patient engagement.,Each primary care practice can devise a COPD care workflow addressing risk awareness, spirometric diagnosis, guideline-based treatment and rehabilitation, and self-management support, to improve patient outcomes in COPD.

Chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) exacerbations are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.,Data regarding factors which causes or prevents exacerbations is very limited.,The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the results from available studies to identify potential risk factors for hospital admission and/or re-admission among patients experiencing COPD exacerbations.,We undertook a systematic review of the literature.,Potential studies were identified by searching the electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane library, reference lists in trial reports, and other relevant articles.,Seventeen articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were identified.,Heterogeneity of study designs, risk factors and outcomes restrict the result to only a systematic review and precluded a formal meta-analysis.,In this review, three predictive factors: previous hospital admission, dyspnea and oral corticosteroids were all found to be significant risk factors of readmissions and variables including using long term oxygen therapy, having low health status or poor health related quality of life and not having routine physical activity were all associated with an increased risk of both admission and readmission to hospital.,There are a number of potential modifiable factors that are independently associated with a higher risk of COPD exacerbation requiring admission/readmission to the hospital.,Identifying these factors and the development of targeted interventions could potentially reduce the number and severity of such exacerbations.

The clinical benefit of continued supervised maintenance exercise programs following pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD remains unclear.,This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy of supervised maintenance exercise programs compared to usual care following pulmonary rehabilitation completion on health care use and mortality.,Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and PEDro) and trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and Current Controlled Trials) were searched for randomized trials comparing supervised maintenance exercise programs with usual care following pulmonary rehabilitation completion.,Primary outcomes were respiratory-cause hospital admissions, exacerbations requiring treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic corticosteroids, and mortality.,Eight trials (790 COPD patients) met the inclusion criteria, six providing data for meta-analysis.,Continued supervised maintenance exercise compared to usual care following pulmonary rehabilitation completion significantly reduced the risk of experiencing at least one respiratory-cause hospital admission (risk ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.81, P<0.001).,Meta-analyses also suggested that supervised maintenance exercise leads to a clinically important reduction in the rate of respiratory-cause hospital admissions (rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.50-1.05, P=0.09), overall risk of an exacerbation (risk ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.52-1.19, P=0.25), and mortality (risk ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.17-1.92, P=0.37).,In the first systematic review of the area, current evidence demonstrates that continued supervised maintenance exercise compared to usual care following pulmonary rehabilitation reduces health care use in COPD.,The variance in the quality of the evidence included in this review highlights the need for this evidence to be followed up with further high-quality randomized trials.

There is no independent standardized self-management approach available for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of this project was to develop and test a novel self-management manual for individuals with COPD.,Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD were recruited from primary care.,A novel self-management manual was developed with health care professionals and patients.,Five focus groups were conducted with individuals with COPD (N = 24) during development to confirm and enhance the content of the prototype manual.,The Self-management Programme of Activity, Coping and Education for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (SPACE for COPD) manual was developed as the focus of a comprehensive self-management approach facilitated by health care professionals.,Preference for delivery was initial face-to-face consultation with telephone follow-up.,The SPACE for COPD manual was piloted with 37 participants in primary care.,Outcome measures included the Self-Report Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, Incremental Shuttle Walk Test, and Endurance Shuttle Walking Test (ESWT); measurements were taken at baseline and 6 weeks.,The pilot study observed statistically significant improvements for the dyspnea domain of the Self-Report Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire and ESWT.,Dyspnea showed a mean change of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.23-1.11, P = 0.005).,ESWT score increased by 302.25 seconds (95% confidence interval 161.47-443.03, P < 0.001).,This article describes the development and delivery of a novel self-management approach for COPD.,The program, incorporating the SPACE for COPD manual, appears to provoke important changes in exercise capacity and breathlessness for individuals with COPD managed in primary care.

Using a mobile health (mHealth) intervention, consisting of a smartphone and compatible medical device, has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes while mitigating health care costs.,The aim of this study was to explore the potential facilitators and barriers among health care providers (HCPs) regarding the use of mHealth interventions for COPD management.,This was a qualitative study.,Semistructured individual interviews were conducted with HCPs, including nurses, pharmacists, and physicians who work directly with patients with COPD.,A flexible prompts guide was used to facilitate discussions.,Interview topics included the following: demographics, mHealth usage, perceptions toward challenges of mHealth adoption, factors facilitating mHealth adoption, and preferences regarding features of the mHealth intervention for COPD management.,Interviews were conversational in nature, and items were not asked verbatim or in the order presented.,The interviews were transcribed verbatim and compared against the digital recordings to ensure the accuracy of the content.,After creating a codebook for analysis, 2 researchers independently coded the remaining interview data using pattern coding.,They discussed commonalities and differences in coding until a consensus was reached.,A total of 30 nurses, physicians, and pharmacists participated.,The main facilitators to mHealth adoption are possible health benefits for patients, ease of use, educating patients and their HCPs, credibility, and reducing cost to the health care system.,Alternatively, the barriers to adoption are technical issues, privacy and confidentiality issues, lack of awareness, potential limited uptake from the elderly, potential limited connection between patients and HCPs, and finances.,It is important to understand the perceptions of HCPs regarding the adoption of innovative mHealth interventions for COPD management.,This study identifies some potential facilitators and barriers that may inform the successful development and implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management.

COPD patients are burdened with a daily risk of acute exacerbation and loss of control, which could be mitigated by effective, on-demand decision support tools.,In this study, we present a machine learning-based strategy for early detection of exacerbations and subsequent triage.,Our application uses physician opinion in a statistically and clinically comprehensive set of patient cases to train a supervised prediction algorithm.,The accuracy of the model is assessed against a panel of physicians each triaging identical cases in a representative patient validation set.,Our results show that algorithm accuracy and safety indicators surpass all individual pulmonologists in both identifying exacerbations and predicting the consensus triage in a 101 case validation set.,The algorithm is also the top performer in sensitivity, specificity, and ppv when predicting a patient’s need for emergency care.

The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Clinical outcomes, including mortality, are worse in males, older individuals and patients with comorbidities.,COPD patients are included in shielding strategies due to their susceptibility to virus-induced exacerbations, compromised pulmonary function and high prevalence of associated comorbidities.,Using evidence from basic science and cohort studies, this review addresses key questions concerning COVID-19 and COPD.,First, are there mechanisms by which COPD patients are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection?,Secondly, do inhaled corticosteroids offer protection against COVID-19?,And, thirdly, what is the evidence regarding clinical outcomes from COVID-19 in COPD patients?,This up-to-date review tackles some of the key issues which have significant impact on the long-term outlook for COPD patients in the context of COVID-19.,This up-to-date review tackles some of the key issues which have significant impact on the long-term outlook for COPD patients in the context of COVID-19https://bit.ly/36PKzEO

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been identified as the cell entry receptor used by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1, 2].,Importantly, smokers and patients with COPD are at an increased risk of severe complications and a higher mortality upon SARS-CoV-2 infection [3].,We hypothesised that ACE2 expression is increased in lungs of smokers and patients with COPD, which may at least partially explain their higher risk of a more severe course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).,Therefore, we aimed to investigate the expression of ACE2 on both mRNA and protein level in a large number of lung tissue specimens of well-phenotyped subjects, including never-smokers, current smokers without airflow limitation, and patients with COPD.,This study demonstrates increased protein levels of ACE2 in alveolar and bronchial epithelium of smokers and subjects with COPD, which might facilitate host cell entry of SARS-CoV-2https://bit.ly/2ZazOrd

COPD patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have worse clinical outcomes, as compared to those without COPD.,Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common comorbidity for COPD patients.,Whether COPD with comorbid CVD will increase the risk of CAP is not well investigated.,The incidence and factors associated with CAP in COPD patients with and without CVD were analyzed.,The medical records of patients with newly diagnosed COPD between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed.,The patients’ characteristics, medical history of CVD, occurrence of CAP, and type of medication were recorded.,Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the differences in cumulative incidence of CAP.,Cox’s proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals in relation to factors associated with CAP in COPD patients with and without CVD.,Among 2,440 patients, 475 patients (19.5%) developed CAP during the follow-up period.,COPD patients who developed CAP were significantly older, had lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second, frequent severe exacerbation and comorbid CVD, as well as received inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapy than those without CAP.,The cumulative incidence of CAP was higher in COPD patients with CVD compared to those without CVD.,Patients who received ICS-containing therapy had significantly increased risk of developing CAP compared to those who did not.,For patients with COPD, comorbid CVD is an independent risk factor for developing CAP.,ICS-containing therapy may increase the risk of CAP among COPD patients.

The use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in controlled clinical trials and case-control analyses.,Using claims databases as a research model of real-world diagnosis and treatment, to determine if the use and dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among patients with newly diagnosed COPD are associated with increased risk of pneumonia.,This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients diagnosed with COPD between January 01, 2006 and September 30, 2010, drawn from databases (years 2006-2010).,Patients (aged ≥45 years) were followed until first pneumonia diagnosis, end of benefit enrollment, or December 31, 2010, whichever was earliest.,A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the association of ICS use and risk of pneumonia, controlling for baseline characteristics.,Daily ICS use was classified into low, medium, and high doses (1 μg-499 μg, 500 μg-999 μg, and ≥1000 μg fluticasone equivalents daily) and was modeled as a time-dependent variable.,Among 135,445 qualifying patients with a total of 243,097 person-years, there were 1020 pneumonia incidences out of 5677 person-years on ICS (crude incidence rate, 0.180 per person-year), and 27,730 pneumonia incidences out of 237,420 person-years not on ICS (crude incidence rate, 0.117 per person-year).,ICS use was associated with a dose-related increase in risk of pneumonia, with adjusted hazard ratios (versus no use; (95% confidence interval) of 1.38 (1.27-1.49) for low-dose users, 1.69 (1.52-1.88) for medium-dose users, and 2.57 (1.98-3.33) for high-dose users (P < 0.01 versus no use and between doses).,The use of ICS in newly diagnosed patients with COPD is potentially associated with a dose-related increase in the risk of pneumonia.

To support patients with COPD in their self-management of symptom worsening, we developed Adaptive Computerized COPD Exacerbation Self-management Support (ACCESS), an innovative software application that provides automated treatment advice without the interference of a health care professional.,Exacerbation detection is based on 12 symptom-related yes-or-no questions and the measurement of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and body temperature.,Automated treatment advice is based on a decision model built by clinical expert panel opinion and Bayesian network modeling.,The current paper describes the validity of ACCESS.,We performed secondary analyses on data from a 3-month prospective observational study in which patients with COPD registered respiratory symptoms daily on diary cards and measured SpO2, FEV1, and body temperature.,We examined the validity of the most important treatment advice of ACCESS, ie, to contact the health care professional, against symptom- and event-based exacerbations.,Fifty-four patients completed 2,928 diary cards.,One or more of the different pieces of ACCESS advice were provided in 71.7% of all cases.,We identified 115 symptom-based exacerbations.,Cross-tabulation showed a sensitivity of 97.4% (95% CI 92.0-99.3), specificity of 65.6% (95% CI 63.5-67.6), and positive and negative predictive value of 13.4% (95% CI 11.2-15.9) and 99.8% (95% CI 99.3-99.9), respectively, for ACCESS’ advice to contact a health care professional in case of an exacerbation.,In many cases (71.7%), ACCESS gave at least one self-management advice to lower symptom burden, showing that ACCES provides self-management support for both day-to-day symptom variations and exacerbations.,High sensitivity shows that if there is an exacerbation, ACCESS will advise patients to contact a health care professional.,The high negative predictive value leads us to conclude that when ACCES does not provide the advice to contact a health care professional, the risk of an exacerbation is very low.,Thus, ACCESS can safely be used in patients with COPD to support self-management in case of an exacerbation.

The combination of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or ACOS is a recently defined syndrome.,The epidemiology of the condition is poorly described and previous research has suggested ACOS is associated with worse outcomes than either condition alone.,We therefore decided to complete a systematic review of the published literature.,This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses guidelines.,A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases up to Feb 2015 to identify studies reporting incidence, prevalence, health care utilization, morbidity, or mortality in COPD and asthma.,A total of 19 studies were included in the present study.,The pooled prevalence of overlap among COPD was 27% (95% CI: 0.16-0.38, p<0.0001) and 28% (95% CI: 0.09-0.47, p = 0.0032) in the population and hospital-based studies, respectively.,We found no significant difference between ACOS and COPD in terms of gender, smoking status, lung function and 6mWD.,However, in comparison to subject with only COPD, ACOS subjects were significantly younger, had higher BMI, healthcare utilization, and lower HRQoL.,ACOS is a common condition that exists in a substantial proportion of subjects with COPD.,ACOS represents a distinct clinical phenotype with more frequent exacerbations, hospitalization, worse health-related quality of life, and higher healthcare costs than either disease alone.,There is a critical need to better define the management and treatment of this syndrome.

Several predictors of COVID-19 severity have been reported.,However, chronic airway inflammation characterised by accumulated lymphocytes or eosinophils may affect the pathogenesis of COVID-19.,In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of all patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 with chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma admitted to the Sino-French New City Branch of Tongji Hospital, a large regional hospital in Wuhan, China, from 26 January to 3 April.,The Tongji Hospital Ethics Committee approved this study.,There were 59 patients with chronic bronchitis, COPD and asthma.,When compared with non-severe patients, severe patients were more likely to have decreased lymphocyte counts (0.6×10⁹/L vs 1.1×10⁹/L, p<0.001), eosinopaenia (<0.02×10⁹/L; 73% vs 24%, p<0.001), increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (471.0 U/L vs 230.0 U/L, p<0.001) and elevated interleukin 6 level (47.4 pg/mL vs 5.7 pg/mL, p=0.002) on admission.,Eosinopaenia and elevated LDH were significantly associated with disease severity in both univariate and multivariate regression models including the above variables.,Moreover, eosinophil count and LDH level tended to return to normal range over time in both groups after treatment and severe patients recovered slower than non-severe patients, especially in eosinophil count.,Eosinopaenia and elevated LDH are potential predictors of disease severity in patients with COVID-19 with underlying chronic airway diseases.,In addition, they could indicate disease progression and treatment effectiveness.

There is a paucity of information on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes in asthmatics.,To identify risk factors associated with admission and subsequent mortality among COVID-19-infected asthmatics.,Adults at our institution with a positive polymerase chain reaction for COVID-19 between March 14 and April 27, 2020, were retrospectively identified.,Comorbidities, laboratory results, and mortality rates during hospitalization were recorded.,In total, 737 of 951 (77.5%) asthma patients with COVID-19 were seen in the emergency department (ED), and 78.8% of these ED patients (581 of 737) were admitted.,Individuals with previously measured mean absolute eosinophil counts (AEC) ≥150 cells/μL were less likely to be admitted (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.98, P = .04), whereas concomitant heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were risk factors for admission.,Hospitalized patients with asthma with peak hospital-measured AEC ≥150 cells/μL (n = 104) were less likely to die compared with those whose AEC remained <150 cells/μL (n = 213) (mortality rate 9.6% vs 25.8%; OR = 0.006, 95% CI: 0.0001-0.64, P = .03).,This group had also higher preadmission mean AEC (237 ± 181 vs 163 ± 147 cells/μL, P = .001, OR = 2012, 95% CI: 27.3-14,816).,The mortality rate in patients with asthma alone (no associated CHF, CKD, COPD, diabetes, or hypertension) was similar to that of patients without asthma or any of these comorbidities.,In asthmatics, pre-existing eosinophilia (AEC ≥150 cells/μL) was protective from COVID-19-associated admission, and development of eosinophilia (AEC ≥150 cells/μL) during hospitalization was associated with decreased mortality.,Preadmission AEC influenced the AEC trend during hospitalization.,Having a Th2-asthma phenotype might be an important predictor for reduced COVID-19 morbidity and mortality that should be further explored in prospective and mechanistic studies.

The Chinese herbal Bufei Jianpi formula (BJF) provides an effective treatment option for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, the systems-level mechanism underlying the clinical effects of BJF on COPD remains unknown.,In this study, a systems pharmacology model based on absorption filtering, network targeting, and systems analyses was applied specifically to clarify the active compounds and therapeutic mechanisms of BJF.,Then, a rat model of cigarette smoke- and bacterial infection-induced COPD was used to investigate the therapeutic mechanisms of BJF on COPD and its comorbidity.,The pharmacological system successfully identified 145 bioactive ingredients from BJF and revealed 175 potential targets.,There was a significant target overlap between the herbal constituents of BJF.,These results suggested that each herb of BJF connected with similar multitargets, indicating potential synergistic effects among them.,The integrated target-disease network showed that BJF probably was efficient for the treatment of not only respiratory tract diseases but also other diseases, such as nervous system and cardiovascular diseases.,The possible mechanisms of action of BJF were related to activation of inflammatory response, immune responses, and matrix metalloproteinases, among others.,Furthermore, we demonstrated that BJF treatment could effectively prevent COPD and its comorbidities, such as ventricular hypertrophy, by inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production, matrix metalloproteinases expression, and other cytokine production in vivo.,This study using the systems pharmacology method, in combination with in vivo experiments, helped us successfully dissect the molecular mechanism of BJF for the treatment of COPD and predict the potential targets of the multicomponent BJF, which provides a new approach to illustrate the synergetic mechanism of the complex prescription and discover more effective drugs against COPD.

Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show increased airway inflammation and bacterial colonization during stable phase.,The aim of this study was to follow COPD patients and investigate chronic colonization with pathogenic bacteria during stable disease phase, and relate these findings to clinical parameters, inflammatory pattern, lung function, and exacerbations.,Forty-three patients with COPD were included while in a stable state and followed up monthly until exacerbation or for a maximum of 6 months.,The patients completed the Clinical COPD Questionnaire and Medical Research Council dyspnea scale questionnaires, and exhaled breath condensate was collected, followed by spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and sputum induction.,Ten patients were chronically colonized (ie, colonized at all visits) with Haemophilus influenzae during stable phase.,These patients had higher sputum levels of leukotriene B4 (P<0.001), 8-isoprostane (P=0.002), myeloperoxidase activity (P=0.028), and interleukin-8 (P=0.02) during stable phase when compared with other patients.,In addition, they had lower forced vital capacity (P=0.035) and reactance at 5 Hz (P=0.034), but there was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1 % predicted, forced vital capacity % predicted, exhaled breath condensate biomarkers, C-reactive protein, or Clinical COPD Questionnaire and Medical Research Council dyspnea scale results.,Three patients had intermittent colonization (colonized at only some visits) of H. influenzae during stable phase, and had lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers in sputum when compared with the chronically colonized patients.,The difference in airway inflammation seen during stable phase in patients chronically colonized with H. influenzae was not observed during exacerbations.,Some COPD patients who were chronically colonized with H. influenzae during stable phase showed increased airway inflammation and reduced lung volumes when compared with non-chronically colonized patients.

Although the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is similar between men and women, current evidence used to support bronchodilator therapy has been generated in therapeutic trials that have predominately enrolled male patients.,Here, we determined whether there is any significant sex-related differences in FEV1 responses to ipratropium bromide.,Data from the Lung Health Study (n = 5887; 37% females) were used to determine changes in FEV1 with ipratropium or placebo in male and female subjects with mild to moderate COPD over 5 years.,Lung Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) dataset was used to determine whether there were any sex-related differences in gene expression for muscarinic (M2 and M3) receptors in lungs of male and female patients.,After 4 months, ipratropium therapy increased FEV1 by 6.0% in female and 2.9% in male subjects from baseline values (p = 2.42 × 10− 16).,This effect was modified by body mass index (BMI) such that the biggest improvements in FEV1 with ipratropium were observed in thin female subjects (p for BMI ∗ sex interaction = 0.044).,The sex-related changes in FEV1 related to ipratropium persisted for 2 years (p = 0.0134).,Female compared with male lungs had greater gene expression for M3 relative to M2 receptors (p = 6.86 × 10− 8).,Ipratropium induces a larger bronchodilator response in female than in male patients and the benefits are particularly notable in non-obese females.,Female lungs have greater gene expression for the M3 muscarinic receptor relative to M2 receptors than male lungs.,Female patients are thus more likely to benefit from ipratropium than male COPD patients.,•Ipratropium; a muscarinic antagonist bronchodilator is more effective in female COPD patients compared to males.,•The effect was modified by body mass index (BMI) such that thin female subjects respond better.,•Female compared with male lungs had greater gene expression for the M3/M2 ratio of muscarinic receptors.,Ipratropium; a muscarinic antagonist bronchodilator is more effective in female COPD patients compared to males.,The effect was modified by body mass index (BMI) such that thin female subjects respond better.,Female compared with male lungs had greater gene expression for the M3/M2 ratio of muscarinic receptors.,Most evidence used to support bronchodilator therapy in COPD has been generated in therapeutic trials with predominately male patients.,Here, we determined whether there are any significant sex-related differences in lung function responses to the bronchodilator ipratropium bromide.,After 4 months, ipratropium therapy increased lung function in females twice as much as males.,This effect was modified by body mass index (BMI) such that the biggest improvements in lung function with ipratropium were observed in thin female subjects.,Female compared with male lungs had greater gene expression for ipratropium receptors.,Female patients are likely to benefit more from ipratropium than male COPD patients.

Recent reports indicate that over the next decade rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in women will exceed those in men in the western world, though in most jurisdictions, women continue to smoke less compared with men.,Whether female adult smokers are biologically more susceptible to COPD is unknown.,This study reviewed the available evidence to determine whether female adult smokers have a faster decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) compared with male adult smokers and whether age modifies the relationship between cigarette smoke and lung function decline.,A systematic review and a meta-analysis was performed of population-based cohort studies that had a follow-up period of at least 3 years, measured FEV1 on at least two different time points, and presented FEV1 data stratified by gender and smoking status in adults.,Of the 646 potentially relevant articles, 11 studies met these criteria and were included in the analyses (N = 55 709 participants).,There was heterogeneity in gender-related results across the studies.,However, on average current smokers had a faster annual decline rate in FEV1% predicted compared with never and former smokers.,Female current smokers had with increasing age a significantly faster annual decline in FEV1% predicted than male current smokers (linear regression analysis, R2 = 0.56; p = 0.008).,Age did not materially affect the rate of decline in FEV1% predicted in male and female former and never smokers (p = 0.775 and p = 0.326, respectively).,As female smokers age, they appear to experience an accelerated decline in FEV1% predicted compared with male smokers.,Future research powered specifically on gender-related changes in lung function is needed to confirm these early findings.

Adherence to inhaled medications by COPD patients is a challenging issue, but relatively understudied.,The aim of this study is the characterization of adherence to inhaled medications by COPD patients, with a focus on patient-related determinants.,Stable COPD outpatients ≥40 years of age from a respiratory unit and diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria were included in a cross-sectional study.,The Measure of Treatment Adherence (MTA), the Beliefs about Medications Questionnaire (BMQ) and demographic, clinical, and COPD questionnaires were used.,After completing these questionnaires, semi-structured interviews were carried out and participants were encouraged to justify their opinions and behaviors.,Field notes were made during the interviews and each interview was analyzed before the next one.,Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the variables were then performed.,A total of 300 out of 319 participants (mean age =67.7 years, 78.1% males) completed the MTA questionnaire.,Of these, 31.3% were considered poorly adherent and 16.7% as non-adherent to the inhaled therapy.,A statistically significant negative association was found between adherence and current smoking status (P=0.044), and between adherence and FEV1% (P=0.000).,The mean BMQ Necessity score was higher in adherent patients (P=0.000), but the the mean Concern score was similar for both (P=0.877).,We found nine patterns of poor-adherence, six reasons given for poor-adherence behaviors, five reasons for good-adherence behaviors and three patient-related domains on adherence to medications.,Adherence is related to need perception and to the functional severity of the disease.,A non-adherent patient is usually a current smoker with lower degree of airflow limitation and lower perception of medication necessity.,New information obtained was related to the patterns and reasons for different adherence behaviors, which are based on three major groups of patient related-determinants: health-related experiences, health-related behaviors and health-related beliefs.

Seasonal variations in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been reported.,However, the influence of air temperature and other meteorological factors on COPD exacerbation remains unclear.,National Health Insurance registry data from January 1, 1999 to December 1, 2009 and meteorological variables from the Taiwan Central Weather Bureau for the same period were analyzed.,A case-crossover study design was used to investigate the association between COPD exacerbation and meteorological variables.,A total of 16,254 cases who suffered from COPD exacerbation were enrolled.,We found that a 1°C decrease in air temperature was associated with a 0.8% increase in the exacerbation rate on event-days (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.015-1.138, p = 0.015).,With a 5°C decrease in mean temperature, the cold temperature (28-day average temperature) had a long-term effect on the exacerbation of COPD (odds ratio (OR), 1.106, 95% CI 1.063-1.152, p<0.001).,In addition, elderly patients and those who did not receive inhaled medication tended to suffer an exacerbation when the mean temperature dropped 5°C.,Higher barometric pressure, more hours of sunshine, and lower humidity were associated with an increase in COPD exacerbation.,This study demonstrated the effect of cold temperatures on the COPD exacerbation rate.,Elderly patients and those without inhaled medicine before the exacerbation event were affected significantly by lower mean temperatures.,A more comprehensive program to prevent cold stress in COPD patients may lead to a reduction in the exacerbations rate of COPD.

Mitochondrial damage in airway epithelial cells plays an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Sirtuin 3 (Sirt3) is a mitochondrial deacetylase regulating mitochondrial function, but its role in the pathogenesis of COPD is still unknown.,The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Sirt3 on airway epithelial mitochondria in cigarette smoke-induced COPD.,Our present study has shown serious airway inflammation, alveolar space enlargement, and mitochondrial damage of the airway epithelium in COPD rats.,Compared to the control rats, Sirt3 protein expression was significantly decreased in the airway epithelium and lung tissue homogenate from COPD rats.,In airway epithelial cells (BEAS-2B), cigarette smoke extract (CSE) treatment significantly decreased mRNA and protein expression of Sirt3 and manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), as well as MnSOD activity in a concentration and time-dependent manner.,Sirt3 siRNA further significantly intensified the decreases in MnSOD expression and activity and aggravated mitochondrial oxidative stress and cell injury when airway epithelial cells were treated with 7.5% CSE.,In contrast, Sirt3 overexpression significantly prevented the decrease of MnSOD expression and activity and improved mitochondrial oxidative stress and cell injury in CSE-treated airway epithelial cells.,These data suggest that Sirt3 inhibits airway epithelial mitochondrial oxidative stress possibly through the regulation of MnSOD, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of COPD.

The development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) pathogenesis remains unclear, but emerging evidence supports a crucial role for inducible bronchus‐associated lymphoid tissue (iBALT) in disease progression.,Mechanisms underlying iBALT generation, particularly during chronic CS exposure, remain to be defined.,Oxysterol metabolism of cholesterol is crucial to immune cell localization in secondary lymphoid tissue.,Here, we demonstrate that oxysterols also critically regulate iBALT generation and the immune pathogenesis of COPD.,In both COPD patients and cigarette smoke (CS)‐exposed mice, we identified significantly upregulated CH25H and CYP7B1 expression in airway epithelial cells, regulating CS‐induced B‐cell migration and iBALT formation.,Mice deficient in CH25H or the oxysterol receptor EBI2 exhibited decreased iBALT and subsequent CS‐induced emphysema.,Further, inhibition of the oxysterol pathway using clotrimazole resolved iBALT formation and attenuated CS‐induced emphysema in vivo therapeutically.,Collectively, our studies are the first to mechanistically interrogate oxysterol‐dependent iBALT formation in the pathogenesis of COPD, and identify a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of COPD and potentially other diseases driven by the generation of tertiary lymphoid organs.

The group assignment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may differ depending on whether the COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC) is used.,This study intended to clarify how different patient characteristics influence the differences, to determine the relationships between CAT and mMRC and to characterise COPD patients by both CAT and mMRC.,This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study.,The data, collected by Taiwan Obstructive Lung Disease consortium, were managed and analysed.,Of the 757 participants, COPD group assignment was not identical as well as no substantial agreement presented when categorised based on the cut-point CAT score ⩾10 and each mMRC cut-point.,In all, 38.2% of participants had discordant group assignments together with a lower mean CAT score, less severe airway obstruction and less severe airflow limitation compared with those with concordant group assignments.,In the discordant group, the CAT⩾10/mMRC 0-1 subgroup had more wheezing than CAT<10/mMRC⩾2 subgroup.,Only moderate correlations existed between CAT and mMRC.,More-symptom groups and combined high-risk group had better correlations than less-symptom groups and combined low-risk group, respectively.,A modest negative correlation existed between forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage (FEV1%) predicted and CAT score and between FEV1% predicted and mMRC scale in parallel with a significant positive relationship existing between the CAT score and mMRC scale.,Notably, a significant proportion of COPD patients with each scale of mMRC had health status impairment.,The Global initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease committee should redefine the applications of CAT and mMRC in the management of COPD.

Improvement in the daily physical activity (PA) is important for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, the effects of pharmacologic treatment on PA are not well understood.,We evaluated the effects of additional medications, including bronchodilator with or without inhaled corticosteroid, based on airflow limitation and breathlessness on the PA in COPD patients and the factors that could predict or affect the improvement in PA.,A prospective non-randomized observational study was employed.,Twenty-one COPD subjects without any other diseases that might reduce PA were recruited.,The PA was measured with a triaxial accelerometer for 2 weeks, and pulmonary function tests and incremental shuttle walking tests were administered before and after 4-week treatment with an additional medication.,Bronchodilation was obtained by additional medication.,The mean values of PA evaluated by metabolic equivalents (METs) at ≥3.0 METs and the duration of PA at ≥3.0 METs and ≥3.5 METs were improved by medication.,The % change in the duration of PA at ≥3.5 METs was significantly correlated with the baseline functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume, and inspiratory capacity/total lung capacity.,However, the % change in the duration of PA at any intensity was not correlated with the % changes of any values of the pulmonary function tests or incremental shuttle walking test except the PA at ≥2.5 METs with FRC.,Medication could improve the PA in patients with COPD, especially at a relatively high intensity of activity when medication was administered based on airflow limitation and breathlessness.,The improvement was seen in the patients with better baseline lung volume, but was not correlated with the improvements in the pulmonary function tests or exercise capacity.

Dysregulated lipid metabolism plays crucial roles in various diseases, including diabetes mellitus, cancer, and neurodegeneration.,Recent studies suggest that alterations in major lipid metabolic pathways contribute to pathogenesis of lung diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,These changes allow lung tissue to meet the energy needs and trigger anabolic pathways that initiate the synthesis of active molecules directly involved in the inflammation.,In this review, we summarize the changes of catabolism and anabolism of lipids, lipid molecules including lipid mediators, lipid synthesis transcription factors, cholesterol, and phospholipids, and how those lipid molecules participate in the initiation and resolution of inflammation in COPD.

The purpose of this study was to explore the insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) level in the serum of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients during acute exacerbation (AE).,The study population consisted of 47 AECOPD patients, including 25 patients enrolled between January 2011 and February 2011 (the first group) and 22 patients enrolled from December 2011 to August 2012 (the second group) and 29 healthy controls.,Chemiluminescence-linked immunoassay was used to detect serum IGFBP7 levels.,For the second group patients, IGFBP7 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured both on the admission day and on the discharge day.,Among the first group AECOPD patients, serum IGFBP7 levels were significantly elevated in AECOPD patients in the intensive care unit (ICU; 52.92±16.32 ng/mL), and in hospitalized AECOPD patients not in ICU (40.66±13.9), compared to healthy subjects (30.3±7.09 ng/mL; P<0.01).,For the second group AECOPD patients, the increased IGFBP7 levels reduced after the patients had recovered (34.42±11.88 vs 27.24±7.2 ng/mL; P<0.01).,During AE, the correlation coefficient between IGFBP7 and CRP was 0.357.,In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.799 for CRP, and 0.663 for IGFBP7 in distinguishing patients with AECOPD on the admission day from the discharge day.,Serum IGFBP7 levels were raised during AECOPD.,Similar to the expression pattern of CRP, the IGFBP7 levels reduced after convalescence, suggesting that IGFBP7 might have a candidate role as a biomarker of AECOPD.,No significant linear correlation was detected between IGFBP7 and CRP, indicating the probable different role for the two molecules in assessing AECOPD.,Further study is needed to explore the value of IGFBP7 in differentiating phenotypes of AECOPD.

Care guidelines for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend an integrated approach for holistic, flexible, and tailored interventions.,Continuity of care is also emphasised.,However, many patients with COPD experience fragmented care.,Discontinuities in healthcare and related social services are likely to result in disjointed rather than integrated care which can negatively affect patient health outcomes.,The purpose of this qualitative study was to improve our understanding of, and how, contextual features pertaining to structures and processes of COPD integrated care influence delivery of care within patients’ healthcare networks.,We conducted individual interviews with 28 participants (9 patients, 16 healthcare professionals, and 3 spousal caregivers).,Participants were recruited through the lung clinic at a city hospital in western Canada.,We employed a social network paradigm to analyse and interpret the data.,The analysis revealed an overarching theme of fragmented COPD care with two sub-themes: (1) Funding shortfalls and availability of resources, and (2) Dis(mis)connected communication pathways.,The overarching theme depicts variations, delays, and discontinuities in patient care.,The sub-themes describe how macro level influences and meso level shortfalls were perceived to influence the availability of respiratory care resources that contributed to fragmented COPD care.,Employing a social network lens drew particular attention to family physicians’ pivotal role in delivering community-based COPD care.,While an integrated approach to care is recommended by care guidelines, institutional and organizational structures and processes, such as financial and communication structures, may inhibit delivery of integrated care.,Thus, macro and meso level structures and processes have the potential to shape patient care by constraining family physicians’ purposive and communication actions necessary for facilitating an integrated distributed approach to care.,We propose a context of care which fosters a context for family physicians’ delivery of patient-centered care.,Integrated care delivery may improve patients’ wellbeing and alleviate financial constraints on the healthcare system.

Increased awareness and understanding of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an important aspect of disease management.,The aim of this study was to explore COPD awareness among smokers participating in a smoking cessation program.,Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 289 subjects in three smoking cessation clinics, using a structured questionnaire.,A total of 68.2% of subjects had COPD-related symptoms, and 19.7% were in poor health.,Only 1.0% of the subjects knew that COPD was a respiratory disease.,A total of 2.4% of subjects had been diagnosed with COPD and received treatment.,Television was the most common source of information about COPD, with 57.1% of the subjects receiving information in this way.,After being informed about COPD, smoking-cessation willingness increased in 84.1% of the study group.,It increased in 86.3% of the subjects without awareness of COPD and in 81.2% of subjects with COPD-related symptoms.,We found that awareness of COPD is very poor among current smokers in Korea.,Many smokers perceived their health status as good, despite the presence of COPD-related symptoms.,As the level of smoking-cessation willingness was different between those with and without awareness of COPD or COPD-related symptoms, a personalized education program with various educational tools may be needed to enhance awareness of the disease and to motivate smokers to quit.

The role of statins as anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is controversial.,This study aimed to determine the efficacy of statins used with or without corticosteroids in COPD patients.,This was a retrospective cohort study and used the two million outpatients and inpatients in Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database covering 2000 to 2015.,A total of 92,460 patients were identified in this study.,We divided COPD patients into four groups by auditing each patient’s medication (statins used or not; corticosteroids used or not) and used Cox regression to analyze and compare the effects of statins in COPD patients with or without corticosteroids.,In terms of all COPD patients, our findings were consistent with previous studies showing that statins decreased COPD-related hospitalization and mortality rates.,However, the beneficial effects were only observed in younger patients or those not taking corticosteroids in further analysis.,Statins significantly decreased hospitalization and mortality rates in the non-corticosteroids groups.,The hazard ratios increased with age and were not statistically significant for patients > 70 years old.,Statins did not significantly decrease ED visits, hospitalization, and mortality in corticosteroids groups.,Statins decreased hospitalization and mortality rates in COPD patients not taking corticosteroids but were not efficacious in patients on corticosteroids therapy.,Furthermore, the beneficial effects of statins gradually decreased with patient age.,Based on the findings, statins used in COPD patients may need to consider the patient age and corticosteroids used or not.

Although culture-independent techniques have shown that the lungs are not sterile, little is known about the lung microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We used pyrosequencing of 16S amplicons to analyze the lung microbiome in two ways: first, using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to sample the distal bronchi and air-spaces; and second, by examining multiple discrete tissue sites in the lungs of six subjects removed at the time of transplantation.,We performed BAL on three never-smokers (NS) with normal spirometry, seven smokers with normal spirometry (“heathy smokers”, HS), and four subjects with COPD (CS).,Bacterial 16 s sequences were found in all subjects, without significant quantitative differences between groups.,Both taxonomy-based and taxonomy-independent approaches disclosed heterogeneity in the bacterial communities between HS subjects that was similar to that seen in healthy NS and two mild COPD patients.,The moderate and severe COPD patients had very limited community diversity, which was also noted in 28% of the healthy subjects.,Both approaches revealed extensive membership overlap between the bacterial communities of the three study groups.,No genera were common within a group but unique across groups.,Our data suggests the existence of a core pulmonary bacterial microbiome that includes Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Haemophilus, Veillonella, and Porphyromonas.,Most strikingly, there were significant micro-anatomic differences in bacterial communities within the same lung of subjects with advanced COPD.,These studies are further demonstration of the pulmonary microbiome and highlight global and micro-anatomic changes in these bacterial communities in severe COPD patients.

Patients with COPD who remain symptomatic on long-acting bronchodilator monotherapy may benefit from step-up therapy to a long-acting bronchodilator combination.,This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) in patients with moderate COPD who remained symptomatic on tiotropium (TIO).,In this randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group study (NCT01899742), patients (N=494) who were prescribed TIO for ≥3 months at screening (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 50%-70% of predicted; modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] score ≥1) and completed a 4-week run-in with TIO were randomized to UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg or TIO 18 µg for 12 weeks.,Efficacy assessments included trough FEV1 at Day 85 (primary end point), 0-3 h serial FEV1, rescue medication use, Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT).,Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs).,Compared with TIO, UMEC/VI produced greater improvements in trough FEV1 (least squares [LS] mean difference: 88 mL at Day 85 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 45-131]; P<0.001) and FEV1 after 5 min on Day 1 (50 mL [95% CI: 27-72]; P<0.001).,Reductions in rescue medication use over 12 weeks were greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO (LS mean change: −0.1 puffs/d [95% CI: −0.2-0.0]; P≤0.05).,More patients achieved clinically meaningful improvements in TDI score (≥1 unit) with UMEC/VI (63%) versus TIO (49%; odds ratio at Day 84=1.78 [95% CI: 1.21-2.64]; P≤0.01).,Improvements in SGRQ and CAT scores were similar between treatments.,The incidence of AEs was similar with UMEC/VI (30%) and TIO (31%).,UMEC/VI step-up therapy provides clinical benefit over TIO monotherapy in patients with moderate COPD who are symptomatic on TIO alone.

Several fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of long-acting bronchodilators (a long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA] plus a long-acting β2-agonist [LABA]) are available for the treatment of COPD.,Studies of these FDCs have demonstrated substantial improvements in lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) in comparison with their respective constituent monocomponents.,Improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms and health status, as well as exacerbation rates, have been reported compared with a LABA or LAMA alone, but results are less consistent.,The inconsistencies may in part be owing to differences in study design, methods used to assess study end points, and patient populations.,Nevertheless, these observations tend to support an association between improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and improvements in symptom-based outcomes.,In order to assess the effects of FDCs on PROs and evaluate relationships between PROs and changes in lung function, we performed a systematic literature search of publications reporting randomized controlled trials of FDCs.,Results of this literature search were independently assessed by two reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving any conflicting results.,In total, 22 Phase III randomized controlled trials of FDC bronchodilators in COPD were identified, with an additional study including a post-literature search (ten for indacaterol-glycopyrronium once daily, eight for umeclidinium-vilanterol once daily, three for tiotropium-olodaterol once daily, and two for aclidinium-formoterol twice daily).,Results from these studies demonstrated that the LAMA-LABA FDCs significantly improved lung function compared with their component monotherapies or other single-agent treatments.,Furthermore, LABA-LAMA combinations also generally improved symptoms and health status versus monotherapies, although some discrepancies between lung function and PROs were observed.,Overall, the safety profiles of the FDCs were similar to placebo.,Further research is required to examine more closely any relationship between lung function and PROs in patients receiving LABA-LAMA combinations.

The decline in lung function can be reduced by long-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment in subsets of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We aimed to identify which clinical, physiological and non-invasive inflammatory characteristics predict the benefits of ICS on lung function decline in COPD.,Analysis was performed in 50 steroid-naive compliant patients with moderate to severe COPD (postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 30-80% of predicted, compatible with GOLD stages II-III), age 45-75 years, >10 packyears smoking and without asthma.,Patients were treated with fluticasone propionate (500 μg bid) or placebo for 2.5 years.,Postbronchodilator FEV1, dyspnea and health status were measured every 3 months; lung volumes, airway hyperresponsiveness (PC20), and induced sputum at 0, 6 and 30 months.,A linear mixed effect model was used for analysis of this hypothesis generating study.,Significant predictors of attenuated FEV1-decline by fluticasone treatment compared to placebo were: fewer packyears smoking, preserved diffusion capacity, limited hyperinflation and lower inflammatory cell counts in induced sputum (p<0.04).,Long-term benefits of ICS on lung function decline in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD are most pronounced in patients with fewer packyears, and less severe emphysema and inflammation.,These data generate novel hypotheses on phenotype-driven therapy in COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00158847

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce exacerbation rates and improve health status but can increase the risk of pneumonia in COPD.,The GLUCOLD study, investigating patients with mild-to-moderate COPD, has shown that long-term (2.5-year) ICS therapy induces anti-inflammatory effects.,The literature suggests that cigarette smoking causes ICS insensitivity.,The aim of this study is to compare anti-inflammatory effects of ICS in persistent smokers and persistent ex-smokers in a post-hoc analysis of the GLUCOLD study.,Persistent smokers (n = 41) and persistent ex-smokers (n = 31) from the GLUCOLD cohort were investigated.,Effects of ICS treatment compared with placebo were estimated by analysing changes in lung function, hyperresponsiveness, and inflammatory cells in sputum and bronchial biopsies during short-term (0-6 months) and long-term (6-30 months) treatment using multiple regression analyses.,Bronchial mast cells were reduced by short-term and long-term ICS treatment in both smokers and ex-smokers.,In contrast, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells were reduced by short-term ICS treatment in smokers only.,In addition, sputum neutrophils and lymphocytes, and bronchial CD8+ cells were reduced after long-term treatment in ex-smokers only.,No significant interactions existed between smoking and ICS treatment.,Even in the presence of smoking, long-term ICS treatment may lead to anti-inflammatory effects in the lung.,Some anti-inflammatory ICS effects are comparable in smokers and ex-smokers with COPD, other effects are cell-specific.,The clinical relevance of these findings, however, are uncertain.

The Phase IV, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ACTIVATE study (NCT02424344) evaluated the effect of aclidinium/formoterol (AB/FF) 400/12 μg twice daily on lung hyperinflation, exercise capacity, and physical activity in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,Patients received AB/FF (n=134) or placebo (n=133) (1:1) via the Genuair™/Pressair® dry powder inhaler for 8 weeks.,From Weeks 5 to 8, all patients participated in behavioral intervention (BI; daily messages providing step goals).,The primary end point was trough functional residual capacity (FRC) at Week 4.,Exercise endurance time and physical activity were assessed at Week 4 (pharmacotherapy only) and at Week 8 (8 weeks of pharmacotherapy plus 4 weeks of BI).,Other end points included post-dose FRC, residual volume, and inspiratory capacity (IC) at rest and during exercise.,After 4 weeks, trough FRC improved with AB/FF versus placebo but did not reach significance (125 mL; P=0.0690).,However, post-dose FRC, residual volume, and IC at rest improved significantly with AB/FF at Week 4 versus placebo (all P<0.0001).,AB/FF significantly improved exercise endurance time and IC at isotime versus placebo at Week 4 (P<0.01 and P<0.0001, respectively) and Week 8 (P<0.05 and P<0.0001, respectively).,AB/FF achieved higher step counts (P<0.01) with fewer inactive patients (P<0.0001) at Week 4 versus placebo.,Following BI, AB/FF maintained improvements in physical activity at Week 8 and nonsignificant improvements were observed with placebo.,AB/FF 400/12 μg demonstrated improvements in lung hyperinflation, exercise capacity, and physical activity versus placebo that were maintained following the addition of BI.,A 4-week period of BI might be too short to augment the improvements of physical activity observed with AB/FF.

Sleep quality is often poor in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A cross-sectional European survey investigated the prevalence of night-time symptoms in COPD to evaluate the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the presence of night-time symptoms, and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without night-time symptoms.,A total of 251 primary care physicians and 251 respiratory specialists completed record forms on 2,807 patients with COPD.,The forms captured information on patient demographics, lung function, COPD severity, and symptoms.,Patients completed questionnaires on the time of day when their COPD symptoms bothered them, and the impact of COPD on their ability to get up in the morning and on sleep.,Data were compared between groups (those with and without night-time symptoms) using t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests.,The kappa statistic was used to assess the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the impact of night-time symptoms.,Most patients (78%) reported night-time disturbance.,Patients with night-time symptoms experienced more daytime breathlessness (mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score 2.4 versus 1.1) and exacerbations in the previous 12 months (mean 1.7 versus 0.4), and received more maintenance therapy (mean of 2.8 versus 2.3 products) than those without.,Concordance between the frequency of physician-reported (67.9% of patients) and patient-reported (68.5% of patients) night-time symptoms was good.,Physicians significantly underestimated the impact of COPD on the patient’s ability to get up in the morning and on sleep (fair-moderate agreement).,Physician-reported night-time symptoms were present for 41.2% of patients who could be categorized by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (n=937), increasing from 20.9% of those in the low-risk group to 77.4% of those in the high-riskgroup.,Patients with COPD experience night-time symptoms regardless of GOLD group, that impact on their ability to get up in the morning and on their sleep quality.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) participate in inflammation and tissue remolding in various diseases, but their roles in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not yet clear.,This study aimed to investigate if PAI-1 and suPAR were involved in systemic inflammation and small airway obstruction (SAO) in COPD.,Demographic and clinical characteristics, spirometry examination, and blood samples were obtained from 84 COPD patients and 51 healthy volunteers.,Serum concentrations of PAI-1, suPAR, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were detected with Magnetic Luminex Screening Assay.,Differences between groups were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or chi-square test.,Pearson’s partial correlation test (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, cigarette status, and passive smoke exposure) and multivariable linear analysis were used to explore the relationships between circulating PAI-1 and indicators of COPD.,First, we found that serum PAI-1 levels but not suPAR levels were significantly increased in COPD patients compared with healthy volunteers (125.56±51.74 ng/mL versus 102.98±36.62 ng/mL, P=0.007).,Then, the correlation analysis showed that circulating PAI-1 was inversely correlated with pulmonary function parameters including the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), FEV1/Pre (justified r=−0.308, P<0.001; justified r=−0.295, P=0.001, respectively) and SAO indicators such as FEV3/FVC, MMEF25-75/Pre (justified r=−0.289, P=0.001; justified r=−0.273, P=0.002, respectively), but positively related to the inflammatory marker CRP (justified r=0.351, P<0.001), the small airway remolding biomarker TIMP-1, and MMP-9 (justified r=0.498, P<0.001; justified r=0.267, P=0.002, respectively).,Besides, multivariable linear analysis showed that FEV1/FVC, CRP, and TIMP-1 were independent parameters associated with PAI-1.,Our findings first illustrate that elevated serum PAI-1 levels are related to the lung function decline, systemic inflammation, and SAO in COPD, suggesting that PAI-1 may play critical roles in the pathogenesis of COPD.

There is a need for biomarkers to better characterise individuals with COPD and to aid with the development of therapeutic interventions.,A panel of putative blood biomarkers was assessed in a subgroup of the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) cohort.,Thirty-four blood biomarkers were assessed in 201 subjects with COPD, 37 ex-smoker controls with normal lung function and 37 healthy non-smokers selected from the ECLIPSE cohort.,Biomarker repeatability was assessed using baseline and 3-month samples.,Intergroup comparisons were made using analysis of variance, repeatability was assessed through Bland-Altman plots, and correlations between biomarkers and clinical characteristics were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients.,Fifteen biomarkers were significantly different in individuals with COPD when compared to former or non-smoker controls.,Some biomarkers, including tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ, were measurable in only a minority of subjects whilst others such as C-reactive protein showed wide variability over the 3-month replication period.,Fibrinogen was the most repeatable biomarker and exhibited a weak correlation with 6-minute walk distance, exacerbation rate, BODE index and MRC dyspnoea score in COPD subjects. 33% (66/201) of the COPD subjects reported at least 1 exacerbation over the 3 month study with 18% (36/201) reporting the exacerbation within 30 days of the 3-month visit.,CRP, fibrinogen interleukin-6 and surfactant protein-D were significantly elevated in those COPD subjects with exacerbations within 30 days of the 3-month visit compared with those individuals that did not exacerbate or whose exacerbations had resolved.,Only a few of the biomarkers assessed may be useful in diagnosis or management of COPD where the diagnosis is based on airflow obstruction (GOLD).,Further analysis of more promising biomarkers may reveal utility in subsets of patients.,Fibrinogen in particular has emerged as a potentially useful biomarker from this cohort and requires further investigation.,SCO104960, clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00292552

Reasons for the excess risk for cardiovascular disease among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remain unclear.,Our objective was to examine the cardiovascular risk profile for adults with obstructive and restrictive impairments of lung functioning in a representative sample of adults from the United States.,We used data from adults aged 20-79 years who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2010 and had a pulmonary function test.,The severity of obstructive impairment was defined by adapting the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria.,Among 7249 participants, 80.9% had a normal pulmonary function test, 5.7% had a restrictive impairment, 7.9% had mild obstructive impairment, and 5.5% had moderate or severe/very severe obstructive impairment.,Participants with obstructive impairment had high rates of smoking and increased serum concentrations of cotinine.,Compared to participants with normal pulmonary functioning, participants with at least moderate obstructive impairment had elevated concentrations of C-reactive protein but lower concentrations of total cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.,Among participants aged 50-74 years, participants with at least a moderate obstructive impairment or a restrictive impairment had an elevated predicted 10-year risk for cardiovascular disease.,The high rates of smoking among adults with impaired pulmonary functioning, particularly those with obstructive impairment, point to a need for aggressive efforts to promote smoking cessation in these adults.,In addition, adults with restrictive impairment may require increased attention to and fine-tuning of their cardiovascular risk profile.

A high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration above the 99th percentile (i.e. 14 ng/L) is common during Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) and associated with increased mortality.,The objective of the study was to identify factors associated with hs-cTnT levels during AECOPD.,We included 99 patients with AECOPD on admission.,As 41 patients had one or more repeat admissions, there were 202 observations in the final analysis.,We recorded clinical and biochemical data, medication, spirometry, chest radiographs, and ECGs.,The data were analysed for cross-sectional and longitudinal associations using ordinary least square as well as linear mixed models with the natural logarithm of hs-cTnT as the dependent variable.,Mean age at inclusion was 71.5 years, mean FEV1/FVC was 45%, and median hs-cTnT was 27.0 ng/L.,In a multivariable model there was a 24% increase in hs-cTnT per 10 years increase in age (p < 0.0001), a 6% increase per 10 μmol/L increase in creatinine (p = 0.037), and a 2% increase per month after enrollment (p = 0.046).,Similarly, the ratios of hs-cTnT between patients with and without tachycardia (heart rate ≥100/min) and with and without history of arterial hypertension were 1.25 (p = 0.042) and 1.44 (p = 0.034), respectively.,We found no significant association between arterial hypoxemia and elevated hs-cTnT.,Age, arterial hypertension, tachycardia, and serum creatinine are independently associated with the level of hs-cTnT on admission for AECOPD.

Self-management interventions are considered effective in patients with COPD, but trials have shown inconsistent results and it is unknown which patients benefit most.,This study aimed to summarize the evidence on effectiveness of self-management interventions and identify subgroups of COPD patients who benefit most.,Randomized trials of self-management interventions between 1985 and 2013 were identified through a systematic literature search.,Individual patient data of selected studies were requested from principal investigators and analyzed in an individual patient data meta-analysis using generalized mixed effects models.,Fourteen trials representing 3,282 patients were included.,Self-management interventions improved health-related quality of life at 12 months (standardized mean difference 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.16) and time to first respiratory-related hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94) and all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.90), but had no effect on mortality.,Prespecified subgroup analyses showed that interventions were more effective in males (6-month COPD-related hospitalization: interaction P=0.006), patients with severe lung function (6-month all-cause hospitalization: interaction P=0.016), moderate self-efficacy (12-month COPD-related hospitalization: interaction P=0.036), and high body mass index (6-month COPD-related hospitalization: interaction P=0.028 and 6-month mortality: interaction P=0.026).,In none of these subgroups, a consistent effect was shown on all relevant outcomes.,Self-management interventions exert positive effects in patients with COPD on respiratory-related and all-cause hospitalizations and modest effects on 12-month health-related quality of life, supporting the implementation of self-management strategies in clinical practice.,Benefits seem similar across the subgroups studied and limiting self-management interventions to specific patient subgroups cannot be recommended.

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires are being increasingly used in COPD clinical studies.,The challenge facing investigators is to determine what change is significant, ie what is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).,This study aimed to identify the MCID for the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) in terms of patient referencing, criterion referencing, and by the standard error of measurement (SEM).,Patients were ≥40 years of age, diagnosed with COPD, had a smoking history of >10 pack-years, and were participating in a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing intravenous and oral prednisolone in patients admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD.,The CCQ was completed on Days 1-7 and 42.,A Global Rating of Change (GRC) assessment was taken to establish the MCID by patient referencing.,For criterion referencing, health events during a period of 1 year after Day 42 were included in this analysis.,210 patients were recruited, 168 completed the CCQ questionnaire on Day42.,The MCID of the CCQ total score, as indicated by patient referencing in terms of the GRC, was 0.44.,The MCID of the CCQ in terms of criterion referencing for the major outcomes was 0.39, and calculation of the SEM resulted in a value of 0.21.,This investigation, which is the first to determine the MCID of a PRO questionnaire via more than one approach, indicates that the MCID of the CCQ total score is 0.4.

Hospitalization for a severe exacerbation of COPD (eCOPD) is an important event in the natural history of COPD.,Identifying factors related to mortality 1 year after hospitalization could help determine interventions to reduce mortality.,In a prospective, observational, multicentre study, we evaluated data from two cohorts: the Spanish audit of hospital COPD exacerbation care (our derivation sample) and the Spanish cohort of the European audit of COPD exacerbation care (our validation sample).,The endpoint was all-cause mortality.,Mortality was determined by local research managers of the participating hospitals and matched the official national index records in Spain.,In the multivariate analysis, factors independently related to an increase in mortality were older age, cardio-cerebro-vascular and/or dementia comorbidities, PaCO2 > 55 mmHg measured at emergency department arrival, hospitalizations for COPD exacerbations in the previous year, and hospital characteristics.,The area under the receiver-operating curve for this model was 0.75 in the derivation cohort and 0.76 in the validation cohort.,One-year mortality following the index hospitalization for an exacerbation of COPD was related to clinical characteristics of the patient and of the index event, previous events of similar severity, and characteristics of the hospital where the patient was treated.

Acute COPD exacerbations account for much of the rising disability and costs associated with COPD, but data on predictive risk factors are limited.,The goal of the current study was to develop a robust, clinically based model to predict frequent exacerbation risk.,Patients identified from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD) with a diagnostic code for COPD and a forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7 were included in this historical follow-up study if they were ≥40 years old and had data encompassing the year before (predictor year) and year after (outcome year) study index date.,The data set contained potential risk factors including demographic, clinical, and comorbid variables.,Following univariable analysis, predictors of two or more exacerbations were fed into a stepwise multivariable logistic regression.,Sensitivity analyses were conducted for subpopulations of patients without any asthma diagnosis ever and those with questionnaire data on symptoms and smoking pack-years.,The full predictive model was validated against 1 year of prospective OPCRD data.,The full data set contained 16,565 patients (53% male, median age 70 years), including 9,393 patients without any recorded asthma and 3,713 patients with questionnaire data.,The full model retained eleven variables that significantly predicted two or more exacerbations, of which the number of exacerbations in the preceding year had the strongest association; others included height, age, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and several comorbid conditions.,Significant predictors not previously identified included eosinophilia and COPD Assessment Test score.,The predictive ability of the full model (C statistic 0.751) changed little when applied to the validation data set (n=2,713; C statistic 0.735).,Results of the sensitivity analyses supported the main findings.,Patients at risk of exacerbation can be identified from routinely available, computerized primary care data.,Further study is needed to validate the model in other patient populations.

Tiotropium failed to slow the annual rate of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with <70% predicted FEV1.,However, the rate of FEV1 decline is known to be faster at early stages, which suggests that the effects of tiotropium may be more prominent in early-stage of COPD patients.,The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that tiotropium modifies the rate of FEV1 decline in COPD patients with an FEV1≥70%.,We retrospectively reviewed the records of COPD patients diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and July 31, 2012, at Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, and Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center.,The inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥40 years, postbron-chodilator (BD) FEV1≥70% of predicted and FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) <0.70, and spirometry more than two times at certain times of the year.,Conversely, the exclusion criteria were as follows: asthma, lung cancer, pulmonary tuberculosis, pulmonary resection, or long-term use of a short-acting muscarinic antagonist.,The annual lung function decline in patients using tiotropium was compared with that in patients not using the drug.,Of the 587 patients enrolled in the study, 257 took tiotropium.,Following propensity score matching, 404 patients were included in the analysis.,The mean annual rate of post-BD FEV1 decline was 23.9 (tiotropium) and 22.5 (control) mL/yr (P=0.86); corresponding pre-BD values were 30.4 and 21.9 mL/yr (P=0.31), respectively.,Mean annual rate of post-BD FVC decline was 55.1 (tiotropium) and 43.5 (control) mL/yr (P=0.33); corresponding pre-BD values were 37.1 and 33.3 mL/yr (P=0.13).,Therefore, tiotropium does not reduce the rate of lung function decline in COPD patients with FEV1≥70%.

The optimal method of identifying people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from electronic primary care records is not known.,We assessed the accuracy of different approaches using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a UK electronic health record database.,951 participants registered with a CPRD practice in the UK between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2012.,Individuals were selected for ≥1 of 8 algorithms to identify people with COPD.,General practitioners were sent a brief questionnaire and additional evidence to support a COPD diagnosis was requested.,All information received was reviewed independently by two respiratory physicians whose opinion was taken as the gold standard.,The primary measure of accuracy was the positive predictive value (PPV), the proportion of people identified by each algorithm for whom COPD was confirmed.,951 questionnaires were sent and 738 (78%) returned.,After quality control, 696 (73.2%) patients were included in the final analysis.,All four algorithms including a specific COPD diagnostic code performed well.,Using a diagnostic code alone, the PPV was 86.5% (77.5-92.3%) while requiring a diagnosis plus spirometry plus specific medication; the PPV was slightly higher at 89.4% (80.7-94.5%) but reduced case numbers by 10%.,Algorithms without specific diagnostic codes had low PPVs (range 12.2-44.4%).,Patients with COPD can be accurately identified from UK primary care records using specific diagnostic codes.,Requiring spirometry or COPD medications only marginally improved accuracy.,The high accuracy applies since the introduction of an incentivised disease register for COPD as part of Quality and Outcomes Framework in 2004.

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are episodes of worsening of symptoms, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality.,COPD exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation and physiological changes, especially the development of hyperinflation.,They are triggered mainly by respiratory viruses and bacteria, which infect the lower airway and increase airway inflammation.,Some patients are particularly susceptible to exacerbations, and show worse health status and faster disease progression than those who have infrequent exacerbations.,Several pharmacological interventions are effective for the reduction of exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD such as inhaled steroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and their combinations.,Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management, and home ventilatory support are becoming increasingly important, but still need to be studied in controlled trials.,The future of exacerbation prevention is in assessment of optimum combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies that will result in improvement of health status, and reduction of hospital admission and mortality associated with COPD.

There is a need for biomarkers to better characterise individuals with COPD and to aid with the development of therapeutic interventions.,A panel of putative blood biomarkers was assessed in a subgroup of the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) cohort.,Thirty-four blood biomarkers were assessed in 201 subjects with COPD, 37 ex-smoker controls with normal lung function and 37 healthy non-smokers selected from the ECLIPSE cohort.,Biomarker repeatability was assessed using baseline and 3-month samples.,Intergroup comparisons were made using analysis of variance, repeatability was assessed through Bland-Altman plots, and correlations between biomarkers and clinical characteristics were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients.,Fifteen biomarkers were significantly different in individuals with COPD when compared to former or non-smoker controls.,Some biomarkers, including tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ, were measurable in only a minority of subjects whilst others such as C-reactive protein showed wide variability over the 3-month replication period.,Fibrinogen was the most repeatable biomarker and exhibited a weak correlation with 6-minute walk distance, exacerbation rate, BODE index and MRC dyspnoea score in COPD subjects. 33% (66/201) of the COPD subjects reported at least 1 exacerbation over the 3 month study with 18% (36/201) reporting the exacerbation within 30 days of the 3-month visit.,CRP, fibrinogen interleukin-6 and surfactant protein-D were significantly elevated in those COPD subjects with exacerbations within 30 days of the 3-month visit compared with those individuals that did not exacerbate or whose exacerbations had resolved.,Only a few of the biomarkers assessed may be useful in diagnosis or management of COPD where the diagnosis is based on airflow obstruction (GOLD).,Further analysis of more promising biomarkers may reveal utility in subsets of patients.,Fibrinogen in particular has emerged as a potentially useful biomarker from this cohort and requires further investigation.,SCO104960, clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00292552

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is effective in reducing symptoms and improving health status, and exercise tolerance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly impacted PR programs and their delivery to patients.,Owing to fears of viral transmission and resultant outbreaks of COVID-19, institution-based PR programs have been forced to significantly reduce enrolment or in some cases completely shut down during the pandemic.,As a majority of COPD patients are elderly and have multiple co-morbidities including cardiovascular disease and diabetes, they are notably susceptible to severe complications of COVID-19.,As such, patients have been advised to stay at home and avoid social contact to the maximum extent possible.,This has increased patients’ vulnerability to physical deconditioning, depression, and social isolation.,To address this major gap in care, some traditional hospital or clinic-centered PR programs have converted some or all of their learning contents to home-based telerehabilitation during the pandemic.,There are, however, some significant barriers to this approach that have impeded its implementation in the community.,These include variable access and use of technology (by patients), a lack of standardization of methods and tools for evaluation of the program, and inadequate training and resources for health professionals in optimally delivering telerehabilitation to patients.,There is a pressing need for high-quality studies on these modalities of PR to enable the successful implementation of PR at home and via teleconferencing technologies.,Here, we highlight the importance of telerehabilitation of patients with COPD in the post-COVID world and discuss various strategies for clinical implementation.

This systematic review aimed to identify the most effective components of interventions to facilitate self-management of health care behaviors for patients with COPD.,PROSPERO registration number CRD42011001588.,We used standard review methods with a systematic search to May 2012 for randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions reporting hospital admissions or health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,Mean differences (MD), hazard ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.,Effects among different subgroups of interventions were explored including single/multiple components and multicomponent interventions with/without exercise.,One hundred and seventy-three randomized controlled trials were identified.,Self-management interventions had a minimal effect on hospital admission rates.,Multicomponent interventions improved HRQoL (studies with follow-up >6 months St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (MD 2.40, 95% CI 0.75-4.04, I2 57.9).,Exercise was an effective individual component (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire at 3 months MD 4.87, 95% CI 3.96-5.79, I2 0%).,While many self-management interventions increased HRQoL, little effect was seen on hospital admissions.,More trials should report admissions and follow-up participants beyond the end of the intervention.

Little is known about factors that determine health status decline in clinical trials of COPD.,To examine health status changes over 3 years in the TORCH study of salmeterol+fluticasone propionate (SFC) vs. salmeterol alone, fluticasone propionate alone or placebo.,St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was administered at baseline then every 6 months.,Data from 4951 patients in 28 countries were available.,SFC produced significant improvements over placebo in all three SGRQ domains during the study: (Symptoms -3.6 [95% CI -4.8, -2.4], Activity -2.8 [95% CI -3.9, -1.6], Impacts -3.2 [95% CI -4.3, -2.1]) but the pattern of change over time differed between domains.,SGRQ deteriorated faster in patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages III & IV relative to GOLD stage II (p < 0.001).,There was no difference in the relationship between deterioration in SGRQ Total score and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) decline (as % predicted) in men and women.,Significantly faster deterioration in Total score relative to FEV1 % predicted was seen in older patients (≥ 65 years) and there was an age-related change in Total score that was independent of change in FEV1.,The relationship between deterioration in FEV1 and SGRQ did not differ in different world regions, but patients in Asia-Pacific showed a large improvement in score that was unrelated to FEV1 change.,In addition to treatment effects, health status changes in clinical trials may be influenced by demographic and disease-related factors.,Deterioration in health status appears to be fastest in older persons and those with severe airflow limitation.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00268216

Early detection enables the possibility for interventions to reduce the future burden of COPD.,The Danish National Board of Health recommends that individuals >35 years with tobacco/occupational exposure, and at least 1 respiratory symptom should be offered a spirometry to facilitate early detection of COPD.,The aim, therefore, was to provide evidence for the feasibility and impact of doing spirometry in this target population.,Participating general practitioners (GPs) (n = 335; 10% of the Danish GPs) recruited consecutively, subjects with >35 years exposure, no previous diagnosis of obstructive lung disease, and at least 1 of the following symptoms: cough, dyspnea, wheezing, sputum, or recurrent respiratory infection.,Data on age, smoking status, pack-years, body mass index (BMI), dyspnea score (Medical Research Council, MRC), and pre-bronchodilator spirometry (FEV1, FEV1% predicted, FEV1/FVC) were obtained.,A total of 3.095 (51% females) subjects was included: mean age 58 years, BMI 26.3, and 31.5 pack-years.,The majority of subjects (88%) reported MRC score 1 or 2.,FEV1/FVC-ratio ≤ 0.7 was found in 34.8% of the subjects; the prevalence of airway obstruction increased with age and decreased with increasing BMI, and was higher in men and current smokers.,According to the level of FEV1, 79% of the subjects with airway obstruction had mild to moderate COPD.,More than one-third of the recruited subjects had airway obstruction (FEV1/ FVC < 0.7).,Early detection of COPD appears to be feasible through offering spirometry to adults with tobacco/occupational exposure and at least 1 respiratory symptom.

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and treatments require a multidisciplinary approach to address patient needs.,This review considers different models of care across the continuum of exacerbations (1) chronic care and self-management interventions with the action plan, (2) domiciliary care for severe exacerbation and the impact on readmission prevention and (3) the discharge care bundle for management beyond the acute exacerbation episode.,Self-management strategies include written action plans and coaching with patient and family support.,Self-management interventions facilitate the delivery of good care, can reduce exacerbations associated with admission, be cost-effective and improve quality of life.,Hospitalization as a complication of exacerbation is not always unavoidable.,Domiciliary care has been proposed as a solution to replace part, and perhaps even all, of the patient’s in-hospital stay, and to reduce hospital bed days, readmission rates and costs; low-risk patients can be identified using risk stratification tools.,A COPD discharge bundle is another potentially important approach that can be considered to improve the management of COPD exacerbations complicated by hospital admission; it comprised treatments that have demonstrated efficacy, such as smoking cessation, personalized pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacotherapy such as pulmonary rehabilitation.,COPD bundles may also improve the transition of care from the hospital to the community following exacerbation and may reduce readmission rates.,Future models of care should be personalized - providing patient education aiming at behaviour changes, identifying and treating co-morbidities, and including outcomes that measure quality of care rather than focusing only on readmission quantity within 30 days.

Care coordination is defined as good communication between professionals to enable access to services based on need.,To explore patients' experience of care coordination in order to inform current debates on how best to coordinate care and deliver services in end-of-life for patients with lung cancer and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A qualitative study involving serial interviews was performed in 18 patients recruited from three hospital outpatient clinics situated in a hospital.,Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically.,Data comprised 38 interviews.,Patients experiencing services related to lung cancer reported good access enabled by the involvement of a keyworker.,This contrasted with COPD patients' experiences of services.,The keyworker coordinated care between and within clinical settings, referred patients to community palliative care services, helped them with financial issues, and provided support.,For patients with lung cancer, the keyworker's role augmented access to various services and enabled care based on their needs.,The experiences of patients with COPD highlight the importance of providing a keyworker for this group of patients in both secondary and primary care.

Identificar los factores predictores de mortalidad en los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC).,Estudio de cohortes retrospectivas.,Atención Primaria de Lleida, España.,Se incluyó a los 2.501 pacientes mayores de 40 años diagnosticados de EPOC seguidos en Atención Primaria y con al menos una espirometría compatible con EPOC en los 24 meses previos al inicio del estudio (2010).,La variable dependiente fue la mortalidad global en el periodo 01/11/2010-31/10/2013 (por todas las causas) y las independientes: parámetros espirométricos, gravedad (GOLD) y variables clínicas.,Se analizó su asociación con la mortalidad mediante el cálculo de las odds ratio ajustadas mediante un modelo de regresión logística no condicional.,La edad media ± desviación estándar de los 2.501 pacientes al inicio del estudio fue de 68,4 ± 11,6 años.,El 75,0% eran varones.,El 50,8% presentaba un nivel de gravedad leve, seguido por el moderado (35,3%), grave (9,4%) y muy grave (4,4%).,La mortalidad a los 3 años fue del 12,55%.,Los factores asociados a la mortalidad en la EPOC fueron: edad, género masculino, exacerbaciones previas, comorbilidad asociada, tabaquismo, gravedad (GOLD) y no haber recibido la vacunación antigripal estacional, con un área bajo la curva ROC de 0,76.,La aplicación de estas variables, fáciles y factibles de recoger en la práctica clínica, permitiría identificar a aquellos pacientes con mayor riesgo de mortalidad y que podrían beneficiarse de estrategias preventivas/terapéuticas para conseguir aumentar la supervivencia.

Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations.,This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database.,This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis.,A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD).,The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset.,Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively).,ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B.,Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS.,Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS.,A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10).,COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting.,Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms.,Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history.,Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is now the fourth leading cause of death in the world, and it continues to increase in developing countries.,The World Health Organization expects COPD to be the third most common cause of death in the world by 2020.,Effective and continuous postdischarge care can help patients to maintain good health.,The use of electronic health records (EHRs) as an element of community health care is new technology in China.,The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a Web-based coaching program using EHRs for physical function and health-related quality of life for patients with COPD in China.,A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2008 to 2015 at two hospitals.,The control group received routine care and the intervention group received routine care with the addition of the Web-based coaching program using EHRs.,These were used to manage patients’ demographic and clinical variables, publish relevant information, and have communication between patients and health care providers.,Participants were not blinded to group assignment.,The effects of the intervention were evaluated by lung function, including percent of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%), percent of forced vital capacity (FVC%), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximum midexpiratory flow; St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ); Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MMRC); and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).,Data were collected before the program, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the program.,Of the 130 participants, 120 (92.3%) completed the 12-month follow-up program.,There were statistically significant differences in lung function (FEV1%: F1,4=5.47, P=.002; FVC%: F1,4=3.06, P=.02; PEF: F1,4=12.49, P<.001), the total score of SGRQ (F1,4=23.30, P<.001), symptoms of SGRQ (F1,4=12.38, P<.001), the activity of SGRQ (F1,4=8.35, P<.001), the impact of SGRQ (F1,4=12.26, P<.001), MMRC (F1,4=47.94, P<.001), and 6MWT (F1,4=35.54, P<.001) between the two groups with the variation of time tendency.,The Web-based coaching program using EHRs in China appears to be useful for patients with COPD when they are discharged from hospital into the community.,It promotes the sharing of patients’ medical information by hospital and community nurses, and achieves dynamic management and follow-up analysis for patients’ disease.,In addition, this program can postpone the decreasing rate of lung function, improve quality of life, decrease dyspnea, and increase physical capacity.

Given that physical activity (PA) has a positive impact on COPD symptoms and prognosis, this study examined the factors that both encourage and limit participation in PA for individuals with COPD in a primary care setting from the perspective of social cognitive theory.,A purposive sample of 26 individuals with a range of COPD severity (age range: 50-89 years; males =15) were recruited from primary care to participate in one of four focus groups.,Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify key concepts related to their self-efficacy beliefs.,Several barriers and enablers closely related to self-efficacy beliefs and symptom severity were identified.,The main barriers were health related (fatigue, mobility problems, breathing issues caused by the weather), psychological (embarrassment, fear, frustration/disappointment), attitudinal (feeling in control of their condition, PA perception, older age perception), and motivational.,The main enabling factors were related to motivation (autonomous or controlled), attitudes, self-regulation, and performance accomplishments.,When designing interventions for individuals with COPD, it is important to understand the patient-specific social cognitive influences on PA participation.,This information can then inform individually tailored management planning.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibit poor sleep quality and consider morning as the worst time of day for their symptoms.,While work has been done to characterize nighttime (NT) and early morning (EM) symptoms in various populations, the impact and factors associated with NT/EM symptoms among patients with COPD in the United States is not well understood.,Commercially insured patients aged ≥40 years with one or more medical claim for COPD and one or more pharmacy claim for COPD maintenance medication were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between September 1, 2010 and August 31, 2011.,Consenting respondents were asked whether they had COPD symptoms on at least three nights or at least three mornings during the past week.,Respondents were then either assigned to one of three symptom groups to complete the survey or excluded if their predefined group quota limit had been met.,Survey completers completed the survey with questions about COPD symptoms and other commonly used patient-reported outcome measures.,Respondents with NT/EM symptoms were asked about the frequency, severity, and impact of the symptoms on sleep, morning activities, and anxiety levels.,Among respondents with symptoms, 73.1% of respondents with NT symptoms (N=376) and 83% of respondents with EM symptoms (N=506) experienced at least three distinct types of symptoms over the past week, with cough being the most frequently reported symptom.,Approximately half of respondents with NT or EM symptoms perceived their symptoms as moderate to very severe, with a majority reporting their symptoms affected their NT sleep and morning activities, and more than half felt anxious due to their symptoms.,Multinomial logistic regression showed COPD patients with both or either NT/EM symptoms were associated with poorer health status compared to those without.,Improved disease management may reduce NT/EM symptoms and improve health status in patients with COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable lung disease characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible.,In a significant proportion of patients with COPD, reduced lung elastic recoil combined with expiratory flow limitation leads to lung hyperinflation during the course of the disease.,Development of hyperinflation during the course of COPD is insidious.,Dynamic hyperinflation is highly prevalent in the advanced stages of COPD, and new evidence suggests that it also occurs in many patients with mild disease, independently of the presence of resting hyperinflation.,Hyperinflation is clinically relevant for patients with COPD mainly because it contributes to dyspnea, exercise intolerance, skeletal muscle limitations, morbidity, and reduced physical activity levels associated with the disease.,Various pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions have been shown to reduce hyperinflation and delay the onset of ventilatory limitation in patients with COPD.,The aim of this review is to address the more recent literature regarding the pathogenesis, assessment, and management of both static and dynamic lung hyperinflation in patients with COPD.,We also address the influence of biological sex and obesity and new developments in our understanding of hyperinflation in patients with mild COPD and its evolution during progression of the disease.

To review and summarize existing literature on the indirect burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the US.,Medline, Scopus, and OvidSP databases were searched using defined search terms to identify relevant studies.,Eligible studies were published in English between January 2000 and April 2012 and calculated the indirect burden of COPD in a US population in terms of prevalence, incidence or costs of productivity loss, disability, morbidity, or mortality.,Of 53 studies identified, eleven met eligibility criteria, with data years spanning 1987-2009.,Estimates of workforce participation range from 56% to 69% among individuals with COPD and from 65% to 77% among individuals without COPD.,Approximately 13%-18% of those with COPD are limited in the amount or type of work they can do and one-third or more experience general activity limitation.,Estimates of restricted activity days range from 27-63 days per year.,Estimates of mean annual sick leave and/or disability days among employed individuals with COPD range from 1.3-19.4 days.,Estimates of bed confinement range from 13-32 days per year.,Estimated mean annual indirect costs were $893-$2,234/person (US dollars) with COPD ($1,521-$3,348 in 2010 [US dollars]) and varied with the population studied, specific cost outcomes, and economic inputs.,In studies that assessed total (direct and indirect) costs, indirect costs accounted for 27%-61% of total costs, depending on the population studied.,COPD is associated with substantial indirect costs.,The disease places a burden on employers in terms of lost productivity and associated costs and on individuals in terms of lost income related to absenteeism, activity limitation, and disability.,Consideration of indirect as well as direct costs is necessary to gain a more complete view of the societal burden of COPD.

To estimate patient- and episode-level direct costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among commercially insured patients in the US.,In this retrospective claims-based analysis, commercial enrollees with evidence of COPD were grouped into five mutually exclusive cohorts based on the most intensive level of COPD-related care they received in 2006, ie, outpatient, urgent outpatient (outpatient care in addition to a claim for an oral corticosteroid or antibiotic within seven days), emergency department (ED), standard inpatient admission, and intensive care unit (ICU) cohorts.,Patient- level COPD-related annual health care costs, including patient- and payer-paid costs, were compared among the cohorts.,Adjusted episode-level costs were calculated.,Of the 37,089 COPD patients included in the study, 53% were in the outpatient cohort, 37% were in the urgent outpatient cohort, 3% were in the ED cohort, and the standard admission and ICU cohorts together comprised 6%.,Mean (standard deviation, SD) annual COPD-related health care costs (2008 US$) increased across the cohorts (P < 0.001), ranging from $2003 ($3238) to $43,461 ($76,159) per patient.,Medical costs comprised 96% of health care costs for the ICU cohort.,Adjusted mean (SD) episode-level costs were $305 ($310) for an outpatient visit, $274 ($336) for an urgent outpatient visit, $327 ($65) for an ED visit, $9745 ($2968) for a standard admission, and $33,440 for an ICU stay.,Direct costs of COPD-related care for commercially insured patients are driven by hospital stays with or without ICU care.,Exacerbation prevention resulting in reduced need for inpatient care could lower costs.

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are episodes of worsening of symptoms, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality.,COPD exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation and physiological changes, especially the development of hyperinflation.,They are triggered mainly by respiratory viruses and bacteria, which infect the lower airway and increase airway inflammation.,Some patients are particularly susceptible to exacerbations, and show worse health status and faster disease progression than those who have infrequent exacerbations.,Several pharmacological interventions are effective for the reduction of exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD such as inhaled steroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and their combinations.,Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management, and home ventilatory support are becoming increasingly important, but still need to be studied in controlled trials.,The future of exacerbation prevention is in assessment of optimum combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies that will result in improvement of health status, and reduction of hospital admission and mortality associated with COPD.

Since the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) groups A-D were introduced, the lung function changes according to group have been evaluated rarely.,We investigated the rate of decline in annual lung function in patients categorized according to the 2014 GOLD guidelines.,Patients with COPD included in the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) prospective study, who underwent yearly postbronchodilator spirometry at least three times, were included.,The main outcome was the annual decline in postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), which was analyzed by random-slope and random-intercept mixed linear regression.,A total 175 participants were included.,No significant postbronchodilator FEV1 decline was observed between the groups (−34.4±7.9 [group A]; −26.2±9.4 [group B]; −22.7±16.0 [group C]; and −24.0±8.7 mL/year [group D]) (P=0.79).,The group with less symptoms (−32.3±7.2 vs −25.0±6.5 mL/year) (P=0.44) and the low risk group (−31.0±6.1 vs −23.6±7.7 mL/year) (P=0.44) at baseline showed a more rapid decline in the postbronchodilator FEV1, but the trends were not statistically significant.,However, GOLD stages classified by FEV1 were significantly related to the annual lung function decline.,There was no significant difference in lung function decline rates according to the GOLD groups.,Prior classification using postbronchodilator FEV1 predicts decline in lung function better than does the new classification.

This study forms part of the first complete characterization of the dose-response curve for glycopyrrolate (GP) delivered using Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology via a metered dose inhaler (MDI).,We examined the lower GP MDI dose range to determine an optimal dose for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This randomized, double-blind, chronic-dosing, balanced incomplete-block, placebo-controlled, crossover study compared six doses of GP MDI (18, 9, 4.6, 2.4, 1.2, and 0.6 μg, twice daily [BID]) with placebo MDI BID and open-label tiotropium dry powder inhaler (18 μg, once daily [QD]) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,Patients were randomized into 1 of 120 treatment sequences.,Each sequence included 4 of 8 treatments administered for 14-day periods separated by 7- to 21-day washout periods.,The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (FEV1 AUC0-12) on Day 14.,Secondary efficacy endpoints included peak change from baseline (post-dose) in FEV1 and inspiratory capacity (IC) on Days 1, 7, and 14; change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough FEV1 on Days 7 and 14; change from baseline in 12-h post-dose trough FEV1 on Day 14; time to onset of action (≥10 % improvement in mean FEV1) and the proportion of patients achieving ≥12 % improvement in FEV1 on Day 1; and pre-dose trough IC on Days 7 and 14.,Safety and tolerability were also assessed.,GP MDI 18, 9, 4.6, and 2.4 μg demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant increases in FEV1 AUC0-12 compared with placebo MDI following 14 days of treatment (modified intent-to-treat population = 120).,GP MDI 18 μg was non-inferior to open-label tiotropium for peak change in FEV1 on Day 1 and morning pre-dose trough FEV1 on Day 14.,All doses of GP MDI were well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings.,These efficacy and safety results support GP MDI 18 μg BID as the most appropriate dose for evaluation in Phase III trials in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01566773.,Registered 27 March 2012.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0426-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aclidinium bromide is a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) indicated for maintenance bronchodilator treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The efficacy of aclidinium was compared with tiotropium and glycopyrronium, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in moderate-to-severe COPD patients.,A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs evaluating aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (BID), glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily (OD), tiotropium 18 μg OD, or tiotropium 5 μg OD in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD.,The outcomes of interest were: trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1); St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and proportion of patients achieving ≥4 unit change; Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and proportion of patients achieving ≥1 point change.,The results were synthesized by means of a Bayesian NMA.,Twenty-one studies (22,542 patients) were included: aclidinium 400 μg BID (three studies); tiotropium 5 μg OD (three studies); tiotropium 18 μg OD (13 studies); and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD (two studies).,Regarding trough FEV1 at 24 weeks, aclidinium demonstrated comparable efficacy to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in change from baseline [CFB]), (0.02 L [95% credible interval CrI −0.05, 0.09]); tiotropium 18 μg (0.02 L [95% CrI −0.05, 0.08]); and glycopyrronium (0.00 L [95% CrI −0.07, 0.07]).,Aclidinium resulted in higher improvement in SGRQ score at 24 weeks, compared to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in CFB, −2.44 [95% CrI −4.82, −0.05]); and comparable results to tiotropium 18 μg (−1.80 [95% CrI −4.52, 0.14]) and glycopyrronium (−1.52 [95% CrI −4.08, 1.03]).,Improvements in TDI score were comparable for all treatments.,Maintenance treatment with aclidinium 400 μg BID is expected to produce similar improvements in lung function, health-related quality of life, and dyspnea compared to tiotropium 5 μg OD; tiotropium 18 μg OD; and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD.

This multicenter, prospective, observational study aimed to supplement real-world evidence on the effects of aclidinium bromide on the quality of life (QoL), symptoms, and activity impairment of patients with COPD.,Eligible patients were ≥40 years of age, newly initiated on aclidinium bromide as monotherapy or add-on therapy according to the product’s approved label.,Patient-reported COPD assessment test (CAT), the severity of symptoms and their impact on daily activities, and the features of the Genuair® inhaler device were assessed at enrollment and at 12 weeks post-treatment onset.,Between 13 March 2015 and 29 January 2016, 285 eligible consenting patients (76.3% males; median age: 69.0 years; 26.0% newly diagnosed with COPD) were enrolled by 15 hospital-based respiratory medicine specialists in Greece.,Aclidinium bromide was initiated as add-on therapy to other inhaled maintenance medications in 73.1% of evaluable patients.,The median (interquartile range [IQR]) baseline CAT score decreased from 14.0 (9.0-20.0) to 10.0 (6.0-15.0) points (p<0.001) after 12 weeks of treatment, with 76.5% of the patients achieving a ≥2-point decrease.,The severity of night-time and early-morning symptoms, assessed using a 5-point Likert-type scale, decreased from a median (IQR) of 1.0 (0.0-2.0) to 0.0 (0.0-1.0), and from 2.0 (1.0-2.0) to 1.0 (1.0-2.0), respectively (p<0.001 for both).,In patients with paired data, the prevalence of at least moderate night-time symptoms, early-morning symptoms, and daily activity impairment decreased from 28.2% to 19.1%, from 63.6% to 34.2%, and from 59.5% to 38.7%, respectively (p<0.001 for all).,Inhaler device features were assessed as “very good”/“good” by more than 90% of the patients.,The adverse drug reaction rate was 1.4%.,The study provides real-world evidence on the beneficial effects of aclidinium bromide on the patients’ QoL, symptom severity, and daily activity impairment, which are complemented by a favorable safety profile and high patient satisfaction with the inhaler device.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients may suffer from poor sleep and health-related quality of life.,We hypothesized that disturbed sleep in COPD is correlated with quality of life.,In 180 patients with COPD (forced expired volume in 1 second [FEV1] 47.6 ± 15.2% predicted, 77.8% male, aged 65.9 ± 11.7 years), we administered general (Health Utilities Index 3) and disease-specific (St George’s Respiratory) questionnaires and an index of disturbed sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index).,Overall scores indicated poor general (Health Utilities Index 3: 0.52 ± 0.38), disease- specific (St George’s: 57.0 ± 21.3) quality of life and poor sleep quality (Pittsburgh 11.0 ± 5.4).,Sleep time correlated with the number of respiratory and anxiety symptoms reported at night.,Seventy-seven percent of the patients had Pittsburg scores >5, and the median Pittsburgh score was 12.,On multivariate regression, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was an independent predictor of both the Health Utilities Index 3 and the St George’s scores, accounting for 3% and 5%, respectively, of the scores.,Only approximately 25% of the patients demonstrated excessive sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale >9).,Most patients with COPD suffer disturbed sleep.,Sleep quality was correlated with general and disease-specific quality of life.,Only a minority of COPD patients complain of being sleepy.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects over 250 million people globally, carrying a notable economic burden.,This systematic literature review aimed to highlight the economic burden associated with moderate-to-very severe COPD and to investigate key drivers of healthcare resource utilization (HRU), direct costs and indirect costs for this patient population.,Relevant publications published between January 1, 2006 and November 14, 2016 were captured from the Embase, MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process databases.,Supplemental searches from relevant 2015-2016 conferences were also performed.,Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two independent researchers against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.,Studies were grouped by the type of economic outcome presented (HRU or costs).,Where possible, data were also grouped according to COPD severity and/or patient exacerbation history.,In total, 73 primary publications were included in this review: 66 reported HRU, 22 reported direct costs and one reported indirect costs.,Most of the studies (94%) reported on data from either Europe or North America.,Trends were noted across multiple studies for higher direct costs (including mean costs per patient per year and mean costs per exacerbation) being associated with increasingly severe COPD and/or a history of more frequent or severe exacerbations.,Similar trends were noted according to COPD severity and/or exacerbation history for rate of hospitalization and primary care visits.,Multivariate analyses were reported by 29 studies and demonstrated the statistical significance of these associations.,Several other drivers of increased costs and HRU were highlighted for patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD, including comorbidities, and treatment history.,Moderate-to-very severe COPD represents a considerable economic burden for healthcare providers despite the availability of efficacious treatments and comprehensive guidelines on their use.,Further research is warranted to ensure cost-efficient COPD management, to improve treatments and ease budgetary pressures.

Approximately 210 million people are estimated to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] worldwide.,The burden of disease is known to be high, though less is known about those of a younger age.,The aim of this study was to investigate the wider personal, economic and societal burden of COPD on a cross country working-age cohort.,A cross-country [Brazil, China, Germany, Turkey, US, UK] cross-sectional survey methodology was utilised to answer the research questions. 2426 participants aged 45-67 recruited via a number of recruitment methods specific to each country completed the full survey.,Inclusion criteria were a recalled physician diagnosis of COPD, a smoking history of > 10 pack years and the use of COPD medications in the previous 3 months prior to questioning.,The survey included items from the validated Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] scale and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension [EQ-5D] scale.,Disease severity was measured using the 5-point MRC [Medical Research Council] dyspnoea scale as a surrogate measure.,64% had either moderate [n = 1012] or severe [n = 521] COPD, although this varied by country. 75% of the cohort reported at least one comorbid condition.,Quality of life declined with severity of illness [mild, mean EQ-5D score = 0.84; moderate 0.58; severe 0.41].,The annual cost of healthcare utilisation [excluding treatment costs and diagnostic tests] per individual was estimated to be $2,364 [£1,500].,For those remaining in active employment [n: 677]: lost time from work cost the individual an average of $880 [£556] per annum and lifetime losses of $7,365 [£4,661] amounting to $596,000 [£377,000] for the cohort. 447 [~40%] of the working population had retired prematurely because of COPD incurring individual estimated lifetime income losses of $316,000 [£200,000] or a combined total of $141 m [£89.6 m].,As the mean age of retirees was 58.3 and average time since retirement was 4 years, this suggests the average age of retirement is around 54.,This would mean a high societal and economic impact in all study countries, particularly where typical state retirement ages are higher, for example in Brazil, Germany and the UK [65] and the US [65,66,67], compared to Turkey [58 for women, 60 for men] and China [60].,Although generalisation across a broader COPD population is limited due to the varied participant recruitment methods, these data nevertheless suggest that COPD has significant personal, economic and societal burden on working age people.,Further efforts to improve COPD diagnosis and management are required.

Clinical guidelines recommend long-acting bronchodilators as first maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reserved for patients with more severe disease and exacerbations.,The aim of this analysis was to examine real-life prescribing of first maintenance therapy for COPD in the UK.,Data were extracted from the UK Optimum Patient Care Research Database for patients with a first prescription for COPD maintenance therapy between 2009 and 2012 and a diagnosis of COPD at or before the date of the first prescription for COPD maintenance therapy.,Routine clinical data including demographics, disease history and symptoms, comorbidities, therapy, hospitalisation rate and exacerbation rate were collected and used to characterise patients stratified by disease severity and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (A-D).,The analysis population included 2,217 individuals (55.4% male, 45.2% smokers).,Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) as monotherapy were prescribed as first maintenance therapy for 40.2% of patients.,ICS were prescribed as ICS/long-acting beta-agonists combination for 29.1% of patients or as monotherapy for 15.5%.,ICS (alone or in combination) were prescribed to >40% of patients in each GOLD group.,ICS-containing regimens were prescribed to patients with a history of pneumonia and comorbid conditions for whom the risks of ICS therapy may outweigh the benefits.,The clinical reality of prescribing indicates that ICS are often prescribed outside current guideline recommendations for many patients newly diagnosed with COPD in the UK.,Encouragingly, LAMAs are increasingly being prescribed as first maintenance therapy for these patients.

Sleep quality is often poor in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A cross-sectional European survey investigated the prevalence of night-time symptoms in COPD to evaluate the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the presence of night-time symptoms, and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without night-time symptoms.,A total of 251 primary care physicians and 251 respiratory specialists completed record forms on 2,807 patients with COPD.,The forms captured information on patient demographics, lung function, COPD severity, and symptoms.,Patients completed questionnaires on the time of day when their COPD symptoms bothered them, and the impact of COPD on their ability to get up in the morning and on sleep.,Data were compared between groups (those with and without night-time symptoms) using t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests.,The kappa statistic was used to assess the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the impact of night-time symptoms.,Most patients (78%) reported night-time disturbance.,Patients with night-time symptoms experienced more daytime breathlessness (mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score 2.4 versus 1.1) and exacerbations in the previous 12 months (mean 1.7 versus 0.4), and received more maintenance therapy (mean of 2.8 versus 2.3 products) than those without.,Concordance between the frequency of physician-reported (67.9% of patients) and patient-reported (68.5% of patients) night-time symptoms was good.,Physicians significantly underestimated the impact of COPD on the patient’s ability to get up in the morning and on sleep (fair-moderate agreement).,Physician-reported night-time symptoms were present for 41.2% of patients who could be categorized by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (n=937), increasing from 20.9% of those in the low-risk group to 77.4% of those in the high-riskgroup.,Patients with COPD experience night-time symptoms regardless of GOLD group, that impact on their ability to get up in the morning and on their sleep quality.

Tiotropium is prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and delivered via HandiHaler® (18 μg once daily) or Respimat® Soft Mist™ inhaler (5 μg once daily).,The recent TIOtropium Safety and Performance In Respimat® (TIOSPIR™) study demonstrated that both exhibit similar safety profiles.,This analysis provides an updated comprehensive safety evaluation of tiotropium® using data from placebo-controlled HandiHaler® and Respimat® trials.,Pooled analysis of adverse event (AE) data from tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg and Respimat® 5 μg randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trials in patients with COPD (treatment duration ≥4 weeks).,Incidence rates, rate ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for HandiHaler® and Respimat® trials, both together and separately.,In the 28 HandiHaler® and 7 Respimat® trials included in this analysis, 11,626 patients were treated with placebo and 12,929 with tiotropium, totaling 14,909 (12,469 with HandiHaler®; 2,440 with Respimat®) patient-years of tiotropium exposure.,Mean age was 65 years, and mean prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 1.16 L (41% predicted).,The risk (RR [95% CI]) of AEs (0.90 [0.87, 0.93]) and of serious AEs (SAEs) (0.94 [0.89, 0.99]) was significantly lower in the tiotropium than in the placebo group (HandiHaler® and Respimat® pooled results), and there was a numerically lower risk of fatal AEs (FAEs) (0.90 [0.79, 1.01]).,The risk of cardiac AEs (0.93 [0.85, 1.02]) was numerically lower in the tiotropium group.,Incidences of typical anticholinergic AEs, but not SAEs, were higher with tiotropium.,Analyzed separately by inhaler, the risks of AE and SAE in the tiotropium groups remained lower than in placebo and similarly for FAEs.,This analysis indicates that tiotropium is associated with lower rates of AEs, SAEs, and similar rates of FAEs than placebo when delivered via HandiHaler® or Respimat® (overall and separately) in patients with COPD.

Objective To investigate the occurrence of pneumonia and pneumonia related events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with two different fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist.,Design Observational retrospective pairwise cohort study matched (1:1) for propensity score.,Setting Primary care medical records data linked to Swedish hospital, drug, and cause of death registry data for years 1999-2009.,Participants Patients with COPD diagnosed by a physician and prescriptions of either budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol.,Main outcome measures Yearly pneumonia event rates, admission to hospital related to pneumonia, and mortality.,Results 9893 patients were eligible for matching (2738 in the fluticasone/salmeterol group; 7155 in the budesonide/formoterol group), yielding two matched cohorts of 2734 patients each.,In these patients, 2115 (39%) had at least one recorded episode of pneumonia during the study period, with 2746 episodes recorded during 19 170 patient years of follow up.,Compared with budesonide/formoterol, rate of pneumonia and admission to hospital were higher in patients treated with fluticasone/salmeterol: rate ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.57 to 1.90; P<0.001) and 1.74 (1.56 to 1.94; P<0.001), respectively.,The pneumonia event rate per 100 patient years for fluticasone/salmeterol versus budesonide/formoterol was 11.0 (10.4 to 11.8) versus 6.4 (6.0 to 6.9) and the rate of admission to hospital was 7.4 (6.9 to 8.0) versus 4.3 (3.9 to 4.6).,The mean duration of admissions related to pneumonia was similar for both groups, but mortality related to pneumonia was higher in the fluticasone/salmeterol group (97 deaths) than in the budesonide/formoterol group (52 deaths) (hazard ratio 1.76, 1.22 to 2.53; P=0.003).,All cause mortality did not differ between the treatments (1.08, 0.93 to 1.14; P=0.59).,Conclusions There is an intra-class difference between fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist with regard to the risk of pneumonia and pneumonia related events in the treatment of patients with COPD.,Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT01146392.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using coils (LVRC) is a well-known treatment option for severe emphysema.,The purpose of this study was to identify quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and clinical parameters associated with positive treatment outcome.,The CT scans, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) data were collected from 72 patients with advanced emphysema prior to and at 3 months after LVRC treatment.,The procedure involved placing 10 coils unilaterally.,Various QCT parameters were derived using Apollo imaging software (VIDA).,Independent predictors of clinically relevant outcome (Δ6-MWT ≥ 26 m, ΔFEV1 ≥ 12%, ΔRV ≥ 10%) were identified through stepwise linear regression analysis.,The response outcome for Δ6-MWT, for ΔFEV1 and for ΔRV was met by 55%, 32% and 42%, respectively.,For Δ6-MWT ≥ 26 m a lower baseline 6-MWT (p = 0.0003) and a larger standard deviation (SD) of low attenuation cluster (LAC) sizes in peripheral regions of treated lung (p = 0.0037) were significantly associated with positive outcome.,For ΔFEV1 ≥ 12%, lower baseline FEV1 (p = 0.02) and larger median LAC sizes in the central regions of treated lobe (p = 0.0018) were significant predictors of good response.,For ΔRV ≥ 10% a greater baseline TLC (p = 0.0014) and a larger SD of LAC sizes in peripheral regions of treated lung (p = 0.007) tended to respond better.,Patients with lower FEV1 and 6-MWT, with higher TLC and specific QCT characteristics responded more positively to LVRC treatment, suggesting a more targeted CT-based approach to patient selection could lead to greater efficacy in treatment response.

Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide improve lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, their bronchodilating effect has not yet been compared in the central and distal airways.,Functional imaging using computational fluid dynamics offers the possibility of making such a comparison.,The objective of this study was to assess the effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on the geometry and computational fluid dynamics-based resistance of the central and distal airways.,Five patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage III COPD were randomized to a single dose of salbutamol or ipratropium bromide in a crossover manner with a 1-week interval between treatments.,Patients underwent lung function testing and a multislice computed tomography scan of the thorax that was used for functional imaging.,Two hours after dosing, the patients again underwent lung function tests and repeat computed tomography.,Lung function parameters, including forced expiratory volume in 1 second, vital capacity, overall airway resistance, and specific airway resistance, changed significantly after administration of each product.,On functional imaging, the bronchodilating effect was greater in the distal airways, with a corresponding drop in airway resistance, compared with the central airways.,Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide were equally effective at first glance when looking at lung function tests, but when viewed in more detail with functional imaging, hyporesponsiveness could be shown for salbutamol in one patient.,Salbutamol was more effective in the other patients.,This pilot study gives an innovative insight into the modes of action of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in patients with COPD, using the new techniques of functional imaging and computational fluid dynamics.

COPD is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation, caused by a mixture of small airway disease and pulmonary emphysema.,Programmed cell death has drawn the attention of COPD researchers because emphysema is thought to result from epithelial cell death caused by smoking.,Although apoptosis has long been thought to be the sole form of programmed cell death, recent studies have reported the existence of a genetically programmed and regulated form of necrosis called necroptosis.,Autophagy was also previously considered a form of programmed cell death, but this has been reconsidered.,However, recent studies have revealed that autophagy can regulate programmed cell death, including apoptosis and necroptosis.,It is also becoming clear that autophagy can selectively degrade specific proteins, organelles, and invading bacteria by a process termed “selective autophagy” and that this process is related to the pathogenesis of human diseases.,In this review, we outline the most recent studies implicating autophagy, selective autophagy, and necroptosis in COPD.,Strategies targeting these pathways may yield novel therapies for COPD.

There is no therapy currently available that influences the natural history of disease progression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Although stem cell therapy is considered a potential therapeutic option in COPD, there are no clinical trials proving definitive therapeutic effects in patients with COPD.,Recently, it was reported that pioglitazone might potentiate the therapeutic effects of stem cells in patients with heart or liver disease.,To test the capacity of pioglitazone pretreatment of stem cells for emphysema repair, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of pioglitazone-pretreated human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) on elastase-induced or cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice.,We also investigated the mechanisms of action of pioglitazone-pretreated ASCs.,Pioglitazone-pretreated ASCs had a more potent therapeutic effect than non-pretreated ASCs in the repair of both elastase-induced and smoke-induced emphysema models (mean linear intercept, 78.1±2.5 μm vs 83.2±2.6 μm in elastase models and 75.6±1.4 μm vs 80.5±3.2 μm in smoke models, P<0.05).,Furthermore, we showed that pioglitazone-pretreated ASCs increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production both in vitro and in mouse lungs in the smoke-induced emphysema model.,Pioglitazone-pretreated ASCs may have more potent therapeutic effects than non-pretreated ASCs in emphysema mouse models.

Although depression is considered one of the comorbidities of COPD, the clinical characteristics of depression in patients with early COPD remain unknown.,We aimed to use national-level data to identify the clinical features and risk factors of depression in patients with early COPD.,We examined 7,550 subjects who were registered in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database of 2014 because that was the only year in which the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression status was administered.,Spirometry was used to identify patients with COPD whose forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 50% or more, and these patients were included in the analysis.,Of the 211 subjects with early COPD, 14.2% also had depression, whereas 85.8% did not.,The patients with depression were predominantly living alone and had a greater prevalence of diabetes compared with the patients without depression.,The overall quality of life of the subjects with depression was lower than that of those without depression, and only the quality of life index correlated significantly with depression severity.,In the multivariate regression analysis, female sex (adjusted OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38-2.31; p<0.01), living alone (adjusted OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.37-2.51; p<0.01), and low income (adjusted OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.55-3.04; p<0.01) were identified as significant risk factors for depression.,In patients with early COPD, depression was associated with a low quality of life, and female sex, living alone and low income were significant risk factors for depression.

COPD is highly prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality.,Clinicians have long been aware that patients with COPD have problems with cognition and are susceptible to mood (depression) and anxiety disorders.,With the increasing awareness of COPD as a multisystem disorder, many studies have evaluated the prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions in patients with COPD.,This review presents evidence regarding the prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions (cognitive disorders/impairment, depression/anxiety) in COPD, their risk factors, and their impact on relevant outcomes.,It also discusses both assessment and treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions and makes recommendations for improved screening and treatment.,The findings suggest that clinicians caring for patients with COPD must become familiar with diagnosing these comorbid conditions and that future treatment has the potential to impact these patients and thereby improve COPD outcomes.

The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg twice daily compared to tiotropium 18 μg once daily in adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,A systematic literature review performed in March 2014, using a predefined search strategy in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, identified 17 randomized placebo-controlled trials, (tiotropium n = 15; aclidinium/formoterol n = 2).,Outcomes of interest were: bronchodilation (peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), COPD symptoms [Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and % of responders (>1 unit improvement)] and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) [St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and % responders (>4 unit improvement)], % of patients with ≥1 exacerbations, adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), hospitalization and mortality, all at 24 weeks.,In the absence of head-to-head trials between aclidinium/formoterol and tiotropium, a Bayesian indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was used with placebo as common control.,Regarding bronchodilation, aclidinium/formoterol was found to be more efficacious than tiotropium at peak FEV1, with mean difference in change from baseline (DCFB) 143 mL [95% credible interval (CrI): 112, 174] and at trough FEV1 [DCFB 26 mL (95% CrI −2, 55)].,Aclidinium/formoterol is expected to be more efficacious than tiotropium in improving dyspnea symptoms measured by TDI [DCFB 0.54 points (95% CrI 0.09, 0.99); odds ratio (OR) of responders 1.51 (95% CrI 1.11, 2.06)].,SGRQ results are comparable for aclidinium/formoterol versus tiotropium [DCFB −0.52 (95% CrI −2.21, 1.17); OR of responders 1.16 (95% CrI 0.47, 2.87)].,The ITC results suggest similar safety profiles regarding AEs, SAEs and hospitalization.,Based on the ITC, aclidinium/formoterol is expected to be more efficacious than tiotropium in terms of lung function and symptom control while providing comparable HRQoL results and safety profile.,AstraZeneca.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0299-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combining bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action may improve efficacy and reduce risk of side effects compared to increasing the dose of a single agent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We investigated this by combining two long-acting bronchodilators: once-daily muscarinic antagonist tiotropium and once-daily β2-agonist olodaterol.,Two replicate, double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies (ANHELTO 1 [NCT01694771] and ANHELTO 2 [NCT01696058]) evaluated the efficacy and safety of olodaterol 5 μg once daily (via Respimat®) combined with tiotropium 18 μg once daily (via HandiHaler®) versus tiotropium 18 μg once daily (via HandiHaler®) combined with placebo (via Respimat®) in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,Primary efficacy end points were area under the curve from 0-3 hours of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 AUC0-3) and trough FEV1 after 12 weeks (for the individual trials).,A key secondary end point was health status by St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (combined data set).,Olodaterol + tiotropium resulted in significant improvements over tiotropium + placebo in FEV1 AUC0-3 (treatment differences: 0.117 L [P<0.001], ANHELTO 1; 0.106 L [P<0.001], ANHELTO 2) and trough FEV1 (treatment differences: 0.062 L [P<0.001], ANHELTO 1; 0.040 L [P=0.0029], ANHELTO 2); these were supported by secondary end points.,These effects translated to improvements in SGRQ total scores (treatment difference −1.85; P<0.0001).,The tolerability profile of olodaterol + tiotropium was similar to tiotropium monotherapy.,These studies demonstrated that olodaterol (Respimat®) and tiotropium (HandiHaler®) provided bronchodilatory effects above tiotropium alone in patients with COPD.,In general, both treatments were well tolerated.

Unlike many other COPD studies, the 4-year UPLIFT trial permitted inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use during run-in and treatment phases.,This provided the opportunity to prospectively observe the continuing effects of ICS on respiratory events in closely observed COPD population.,We aimed to determine rate and number of episodes of pneumonia and exacerbations of COPD in patients entering the study on no ICS, fluticasone proprionate (FP), and other ICS.,The UPLIFT dataset was examined retrospectively, and patients were divided into three groups based on their medications at entry: no ICS, FP and other ICS.,Poisson regression was used to compare the frequency of respiratory adverse events.,At entry, the groups were well matched apart from a higher FEV1% predicted (38 vs.,41%; ICS vs. no ICS, respectively) and prevalence of current smoking (26 vs.,36%; ICS vs. no ICS, respectively).,Incidence rates of pneumonia were significantly higher in patients taking ICS compared to no ICS (0.068 vs.,0.056 respectively; p = 0.012).,When the FP group was compared to the other ICS, the event rate was even higher (0.077 vs.,0.058, respectively; p < 0.001).,COPD exacerbations were more frequent in patients taking ICS, with significantly greater rate in the FP group compared to that seen with other ICS (0.93 vs.,0.84 respectively; p = 0.013).,ICS use was associated an increase in respiratory adverse event rates, but whether this was due to more severe illness at entry is unknown.,In subgroup analysis, the excess of morbidity in the ICS group appeared to be mainly associated with those receiving FP at randomisation.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00408-017-9990-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Complications of pneumonia development in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy have been documented.,The aim of this study was to focus on clinical efficacy and the incidence of pneumonia between COPD patients receiving medium and high doses of ICS.,This prospective, randomized study included COPD patients identified from three tertiary medical centers from 2010 to 2012.,The patients were randomized into two groups: high dose (HD; fluticasone 1,000 μg + salmeterol 100 μg/day) and medium dose (MD; fluticasone 500 μg + salmeterol 100 μg/day).,Lung function with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity, and COPD-assessment test (CAT) were checked every 2 months.,The frequency of acute exacerbations and number of pneumonia events were measured.,The duration of the study period was 1 year.,In total, 237 COPD patients were randomized into the two treatment arms (115 in the HD group, 122 in the MD group).,The FEV1 level was significantly improved in the patients in the HD group compared with those in the MD group (HD 103.9±26.6 mL versus MD 51.4±19.7 mL, P<0.01) at the end of the study.,CAT scores were markedly improved in patients using an HD compared to those using an MD (HD 13±5 versus MD 16±7, P=0.05).,There was a significant difference in the percentage of annual rates in acute exacerbations (HD 0.16 versus MD 0.34, P<0.01) between the two groups.,The incidence of pneumonia was similar in the two groups (HD 0.08 versus MD 0.10, P=0.38).,COPD patients treated with high doses of ICS had more treatment benefits and no significant increases in the incidence in pneumonia.,Higher-dose ICS treatment may be suitable for COPD therapy.

Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to suffer exacerbations, even when treated with maximum recommended therapy (eg, inhaled combinations of long-acting β2-agonist and high dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a long-acting anticholinergic [long-acting muscarinic antagonist]).,Roflumilast is approved to treat severe COPD in patients with chronic bronchitis - and a history of frequent exacerbations - as an add-on to bronchodilators.,The REACT (Roflumilast in the Prevention of COPD Exacerbations While Taking Appropriate Combination Treatment) study (identification number RO-2455-404-RD, clinicaltrials. gov identifier NCT01329029) will investigate whether roflumilast further reduces exacerbations when added to inhaled combination therapy in patients still suffering from frequent exacerbations.,REACT is a 1-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III/IV study of roflumilast 500 μg once daily or placebo on top of a fixed long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid combination.,A concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist will be allowed at stable doses.,The primary outcome is the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations.,Using a Poisson regression model with a two-sided significance level of 5%, a sample size of 967 patients per treatment group is needed for 90% power.,COPD patients with severe to very severe airflow limitation, symptoms of chronic bronchitis, and at least two exacerbations in the previous year will be recruited.,It is hypothesized that because roflumilast (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) has a different mode of action to bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, it may provide additional benefits when added to these treatments in frequent exacerbators.,REACT will be important to determine the role of roflumilast in COPD management.,Here, the design and rationale for this important study is described.

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires are being increasingly used in COPD clinical studies.,The challenge facing investigators is to determine what change is significant, ie what is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).,This study aimed to identify the MCID for the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) in terms of patient referencing, criterion referencing, and by the standard error of measurement (SEM).,Patients were ≥40 years of age, diagnosed with COPD, had a smoking history of >10 pack-years, and were participating in a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing intravenous and oral prednisolone in patients admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD.,The CCQ was completed on Days 1-7 and 42.,A Global Rating of Change (GRC) assessment was taken to establish the MCID by patient referencing.,For criterion referencing, health events during a period of 1 year after Day 42 were included in this analysis.,210 patients were recruited, 168 completed the CCQ questionnaire on Day42.,The MCID of the CCQ total score, as indicated by patient referencing in terms of the GRC, was 0.44.,The MCID of the CCQ in terms of criterion referencing for the major outcomes was 0.39, and calculation of the SEM resulted in a value of 0.21.,This investigation, which is the first to determine the MCID of a PRO questionnaire via more than one approach, indicates that the MCID of the CCQ total score is 0.4.

It remains unclear whether severe exacerbation and pneumonia of COPD differs between patients treated with budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol.,Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of those who used budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol for COPD.,Subjects in this population-based cohort study comprised patients with COPD who were treated with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol.,All patients were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database.,The outcomes including severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) were measured.,During the study period, 11,519 COPD patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol and 7,437 patients receiving budesonide/formoterol were enrolled in the study.,Pairwise matching (1:1) of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol populations resulted in to two similar subgroups comprising each 7,295 patients.,Patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher annual rate and higher risk of severe exacerbation than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (1.2219/year vs 1.1237/year, adjusted rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.10).,In addition, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (12.11 per 100 person-years vs 10.65 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20).,Finally, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia requiring MV than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (3.94 per 100 person-years vs 3.47 per 100 person-years, aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24).,A similar trend was seen before and after propensity score matching analysis, intention-to-treat, and as-treated analysis with and without competing risk.,Based on this retrospective observational study, long-term treatment with fixed combination budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring MV than fluticasone/salmeterol in COPD patients.

Some large population-based studies have reported a dose-related increased risk of cataracts and glaucoma associated with use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We evaluated the association between use of ICS-containing products, specifically fluticasone propionate/salmeterol fixed-dose combination (FSC), and incidence of cataracts and glaucoma among patients with COPD in a large electronic medical record database in the United Kingdom.,We identified a cohort of patients aged 45 years and over with COPD in the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) between 2003 and 2006.,Cases of incident cataracts or glaucoma were defined based on diagnosis and procedure codes and matched to controls from the risk set to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).,The association with FSC or ICS exposure was modeled using conditional logistic regression.,Medication exposure was assessed with respect to recency, duration, and number of prescriptions prior to the index date.,Average daily dose was defined as none, low (1-250 mcg), medium (251-500 mcg), high (501-1000 mcg), or very high (1001+ mcg) using fluticasone propionate (FP) equivalents.,We identified 2941 incident cataract cases and 327 incident glaucoma cases in the COPD cohort (n = 53,191).,FSC or ICS prescriptions were not associated with risk of incident cataracts or glaucoma for any exposure category, after adjusting for confounders.,We observed a lack of a dose response in all analyses, where low dose was the reference group.,The odds of cataracts associated with FSC dose were medium OR: 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9-1.4); high OR: 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9-1.5); and very high OR: 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9-1.7).,The odds of glaucoma associated with FSC dose: medium OR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5-2.1); high OR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5-2.0); and very high OR: 1.0 (95% CI: 0.4-2.8).,FSC or other ICS exposure was not associated with an increased odds of cataracts or glaucoma, nor was a dose-response relationship observed in this population-based nested case-control study of COPD patients in the United Kingdom.

Relationships between airway inflammation and respiratory potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs) quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in subjects with COPD are unclear.,Our aim was to evaluate mediators of airway inflammation and their association with PPMs in subjects with COPD at stable state and during exacerbations.,Sputum from 120 stable subjects with COPD was analyzed for bacteriology (colony-forming units; total 16S; and qPCR targeting Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae), differential cell counts, and inflammatory mediators using the Meso-Scale Discovery Platform.,Subjects were classified as colonized if any PPM was identified above the threshold of detection by qPCR.,Symptoms were quantified using the visual analog scale.,At stable state, 60% of subjects were qPCR positive for H influenzae, 48% for M catarrhalis, and 28% for S pneumoniae.,Elevated sputum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were detected in samples qPCR positive for either H influenzae or M catarrhalis.,Bacterial loads of H influenzae positively correlated with IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, and symptoms; and M catarrhalis correlated with IL-10 and TNF-α.,H influenzae qPCR bacterial load was an independent predictor of sputum TNF-α and IL-1β.,In 55 subjects with paired exacerbation data, qPCR bacterial load fold change at exacerbation in M catarrhalis but not H influenzae correlated to changes in sputum TNF-α and IL-1β concentrations.,At stable state, H influenzae is associated with increased airway inflammation in COPD.,The relationship between bacterial load changes of specific pathogens and airway inflammation at exacerbation and recovery warrants further investigation.

Pulmonary surfactant protein D (SP-D) is considered as a candidate biomarker for the functional integrity of the lung and for disease progression, which can be detected in serum.,The origin of SP-D in serum and how serum concentrations are related to pulmonary concentrations under inflammatory conditions is still unclear.,In a cross-sectional study comprising non-smokers (n = 10), young - (n = 10), elderly smokers (n = 20), and smokers with COPD (n = 20) we simultaneously analysed pulmonary and serum SP-D levels with regard to pulmonary function, exercise, repeatability and its quaternary structure by native gel electrophoresis.,Statistical comparisons were conducted by ANOVA and post-hoc testing for multiple comparisons; repeatability was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis.,In COPD, median (IQR) pulmonary SP-D levels were lower (129(68) ng/ml) compared to smokers (young: 299(190), elderly: 296(158) ng/ml; p < 0.01) and non-smokers (967(708) ng/ml; p < 0.001).,The opposite was observed in serum, with higher concentrations in COPD (140(89) ng/ml) as compared to non-smokers (76(47) ng/ml; p < 0.01).,SP-D levels were reproducible and correlated with the degree of airway obstruction in all smokers.,In addition, smoking lead to disruption of the quaternary structure.,Pulmonary and serum SP-D levels are stable markers influenced by smoking and related to airflow obstruction and disease state.,Smaller subunits of pulmonary SP-D and the rapid increase of serum SP-D levels in COPD due to exercise support the translocation hypothesis and its use as a COPD biomarker.,no interventional trial

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by the destruction of alveolar walls, chronic inflammation and persistent respiratory symptoms.,There is no curative clinical treatment for COPD.,In this context, cell-based therapy is a promising therapeutic alternative for COPD.,Thus, in this open, controlled and randomized Phase I Clinical Trial, we aimed to assess the safety of the infusion of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC), adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ADSC) and, especially, the safety of concomitant infusion (co-infusion) of BMMC and ADSC as a new therapeutic alternative for COPD.,The rationale for co-infusion of BMMC and ADSC is based on the hypothesis of an additive or synergistic therapeutic effect resulting from this association.,To achieve the proposed objectives, twenty patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomly divided into four groups: control group - patients receiving conventional treatment; BMMC group - patients receiving only BMMC; ADSC group - patients receiving only ADSC, and co-infusion group - patients receiving the concomitant infusion of BMMC and ADSC.,Patients were assessed for pulmonary function, biochemical profile, and quality of life over a 12 months follow-up.,No adverse events were detected immediately after the infusion of BMMC, ADSC or co-infusion.,In the 12-month follow-up, no causal relationship was established between adverse events and cell therapy procedures.,Regarding the efficacy, the BMMC group showed an increase in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO).,Co-infusion group showed a DLCO, and gas exchange improvement and a better quality of life.,The results obtained allow us to conclude that cell-based therapy with co-infusion of BMMC and ADSC is a safe procedure and a promising therapeutic for COPD.,However, additional studies with a greater number of patients are needed before randomized and controlled Phase III clinical trials can be implemented.

In barely nine months, the pandemic known as COVID‐19 has spread over 200 countries, affecting more than 22 million people and causing over than 786 000 deaths.,Elderly people and patients with previous comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes are at an increased risk to suffer a poor prognosis after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection.,Although the same could be expected from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), current epidemiological data are conflicting.,This could lead to a reduction of precautionary measures in these patients, in the context of a particularly complex global health crisis.,Most COPD patients have a long history of smoking or exposure to other harmful particles or gases, capable of impairing pulmonary defences even years after the absence of exposure.,Moreover, COPD is characterized by an ongoing immune dysfunction, which affects both pulmonary and systemic cellular and molecular inflammatory mediators.,Consequently, increased susceptibility to viral respiratory infections have been reported in COPD, often worsened by bacterial co‐infections and leading to serious clinical outcomes.,The present paper is an up‐to‐date review that discusses the available research regarding the implications of coronavirus infection in COPD.,Although validation in large studies is still needed, COPD likely increases SARS‐CoV‐2 susceptibility and increases COVID‐19 severity.,Hence, specific mechanisms to monitor and assess COPD patients should be addressed in the current pandemic.

Current pharmacological therapies for COPD improve quality of life and symptoms and reduce exacerbations.,Given the progressive nature of COPD, it is arguably more important to understand whether the available therapies are able to delay clinical deterioration; the concept of “clinically important deterioration” (CID) has therefore been developed.,We evaluated the efficacy of the single-inhaler triple combination beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, and glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G), using data from three large 1-year studies.,The studies compared BDP/FF/G to BDP/FF (TRILOGY), tiotropium (TRINITY), and indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY; TRIBUTE).,All studies recruited patients with symptomatic COPD, FEV1 <50%, and an exacerbation history.,We measured the time to first CID and to sustained CID, an endpoint combining FEV1, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), moderate-to-severe exacerbations, and death.,The time to first CID was based on the first occurrence of any of the following: a decrease of ≥100 mL from baseline in FEV1, an increase of ≥4 units from baseline in SGRQ total score, the occurrence of a moderate/severe COPD exacerbation, or death.,The time to sustained CID was defined as: a CID in FEV1 and/or SGRQ total score maintained at all subsequent visits, an exacerbation, or death.,Extrafine BDP/FF/G significantly extended the time to first CID vs BDP/FF (HR 0.61, P<0.001), tiotropium (0.72, P<0.001), and IND/GLY (0.82, P<0.001), and significantly extended the time to sustained CID vs BDP/FF (HR 0.64, P<0.001) and tiotropium (0.80, P<0.001), with a numerical extension vs IND/GLY.,In patients with symptomatic COPD, FEV1 <50%, and an exacerbation history, extrafine BDP/FF/G delayed disease deterioration compared with BDP/FF, tiotropium, and IND/GLY.,The studies are registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: TRILOGY, NCT01917331; TRINITY, NCT01911364; TRIBUTE, NCT02579850.

Several small studies found night-time awakenings due to COPD symptoms were associated with decreased health status.,In this study, night-time awakenings in patients with COPD were examined and effects of tiotropium therapy evaluated.,This study was a post hoc, exploratory, pooled analysis of twin, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials.,Patients with stable moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to tiotropium HandiHaler® (n = 550) or placebo (n = 371) and followed for 13 weeks.,During a 2-week, pre-treatment baseline period and for 13 weeks on treatment, self-reported night-time awakenings due to COPD symptoms, rescue medication (albuterol) use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were recorded daily.,Nightly, COPD-related awakenings were scored: 0 = no awakenings; 1 = 1 awakening; 2 = 2-3 awakenings; or 3 = awake most of the night.,Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and energy-fatigue questionnaires were completed at baseline and during treatment.,Patients were aged 65.2 ± 8.7 years (mean ± SD), with a mean pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 36.1 ± 13.5 % predicted normal at baseline.,Data for night-time awakenings and albuterol use were available for 543 (99 %) patients on tiotropium and 352 (95 %) on placebo.,At baseline, 280 (51.5 %) patients on tiotropium and 179 (50.1 %) on placebo reported ≥1 COPD-related night-time awakening per week.,Over the 13-weeks’ treatment, tiotropium was associated with fewer night-time awakenings, with mean ± SE overall awakening scores per week of 0.356 ± 0.006 compared with 0.421 ± 0.007 for placebo (p < 0.001); means were significantly lower for tiotropium versus placebo in patients with baseline awakenings (p < 0.001), but not for those without baseline awakenings.,COPD-related night-time awakenings were associated with increased nocturnal rescue medication use and lower HRQoL ratings in both treatment arms.,Following start of treatment, tiotropium decreased patients’ use of rescue medication compared with placebo, and morning and evening adjusted means for PEFR were higher for tiotropium compared with placebo.,Tiotropium is associated with decreased COPD-related night-time awakenings.,Night-time awakenings are associated with increased nocturnal rescue medication use and may be a surrogate marker of symptom control in patients with COPD.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0340-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose: Assess the clinical and economic consequences associated with an early versus late diagnosis in patients with COPD.,Patients and methods: In a retrospective, observational cohort study, electronic medical record data (2000-2014) were collected from Swedish primary care patients with COPD.,COPD indicators (pneumonia, other respiratory diseases, oral corticosteroids, antibiotics for respiratory infections, prescribed drugs for respiratory symptoms, lung function measurement) registered prior to diagnosis were applied to categorize patients into those receiving early (2 or less indicators) or late diagnosis (3 or more indicators registered >90 days preceding a COPD diagnosis).,Outcome measures included annual rate of and time to first exacerbation, mortality risk, prevalence of comorbidities and health care utilization.,Results: More patients with late diagnosis (n=8827) than with early diagnosis (n=3870) had a recent comorbid diagnosis of asthma (22.0% vs 3.9%; P<0.0001).,Compared with early diagnosis, patients with late diagnosis had a higher exacerbation rate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-1.96; P<0.0001) and shorter time to first exacerbation (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.54-1.69; P<0.0001).,Mortality was not different between groups overall but higher for late versus early diagnosis, after excluding patients with past asthma diagnosis (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18; P=0.0095).,Late diagnosis was also associated with higher direct costs than early diagnosis.,Conclusion: Late COPD diagnosis is associated with higher exacerbation rate and increased comorbidities and costs compared with early diagnosis.,The study highlights the need for accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care in order to reduce exacerbations and the economic burden of COPD.

Equitable access to affordable medicines and diagnostic tests is an integral component of optimal clinical care of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,In Uganda, we lack contemporary data about the availability, cost and affordability of medicines and diagnostic tests essential in asthma and COPD management.,Data on the availability, cost and affordability of 17 medicines and 2 diagnostic tests essential in asthma and COPD management were collected from 22 public hospitals, 23 private and 85 private pharmacies.,The percentage of the available medicines and diagnostic tests, the median retail price of the lowest priced generic brand and affordability in terms of the number of days’ wages it would cost the least paid public servant were analysed.,The availability of inhaled short acting beta agonists (SABA), oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), inhaled LABA-ICS combinations and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in all the study sites was 75%, 60.8%, 46.9% and 45.4% respectively.,None of the study sites had inhaled long acting anti muscarinic agents (LAMA) and inhaled long acting beta agonist (LABA)-LAMA combinations.,Spirometry and peak flow-metry as diagnostic tests were available in 24.4% and 6.7% of the study sites respectively.,Affordability ranged from 2.2 days’ wages for inhaled salbutamol to 17.1 days’ wages for formoterol/budesonide inhalers and 27.8 days’ wages for spirometry.,Medicines and diagnostic tests essential in asthma and COPD care are not widely available in Uganda and remain largely unaffordable.,Strategies to improve access to affordable asthma and COPD medicines and diagnostic tests should be implemented in Uganda.

To characterise patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are rehospitalised for an acute exacerbation, to estimate the cost of these hospitalisations, to characterise high risk patient sub groups and to identify factors potentially associated with the risk of rehospitalisation.,This was a retrospective study using the French National Hospital Discharge Database.,All patients aged ≥40 years hospitalised for an acute exacerbation of COPD between 2015 and 2016 were identified and followed for six months.,Patients with at least one rehospitalisation for acute exacerbation of COPD constituted the rehospitalisation analysis population.,A machine learning model was built to study the factors associated with the risk of rehospitalisation using decision tree analysis.,A direct cost analysis was performed from the perspective of national health insurance.,A total of 143,006 eligible patients were hospitalised for an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in 2015-2016 (mean age: 74 years; 62.1% men).,25,090 (18.8%) were rehospitalised for another exacerbation within six months.,In this study, 8.5% of patients died during or immediately following the index hospitalisation and 10.5% died during or immediately after rehospitalisation (p <0.001).,The specific cost of these rehospitalisations was € 5304.,The overall total cost per patient of all AECOPD-related stays was € 9623, being significantly higher in patients who were rehospitalised (€ 16,275) compared to those who were not (€ 8208).,In decision tree analysis, the most important driver of rehospitalisation was hospitalisation in the previous two years (contributing 85% of the information).,Rehospitalisations for acute exacerbations of COPD carry a high epidemiological and economic burden.,Since hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation is the most important determinant of future rehospitalisations, management of COPD needs to focus on interventions aimed at decreasing the rehospitalisation risk of in order to lower the burden of disease.

Recent telehealth studies have demonstrated minor impact on patients affected by long-term conditions.,The use of technology does not guarantee the compliance required for sustained collection of high-quality symptom and physiological data.,Remote monitoring alone is not sufficient for successful disease management.,A patient-centred design approach is needed in order to allow the personalisation of interventions and encourage the completion of daily self-management tasks.,A digital health system was designed to support patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in self-managing their condition.,The system includes a mobile application running on a consumer tablet personal computer and a secure backend server accessible to the health professionals in charge of patient management.,The patient daily routine included the completion of an adaptive, electronic symptom diary on the tablet, and the measurement of oxygen saturation via a wireless pulse oximeter.,The design of the system was based on a patient-centred design approach, informed by patient workshops.,One hundred and ten patients in the intervention arm of a randomised controlled trial were subsequently given the tablet computer and pulse oximeter for a 12-month period.,Patients were encouraged, but not mandated, to use the digital health system daily.,The average used was 6.0 times a week by all those who participated in the full trial.,Three months after enrolment, patients were able to complete their symptom diary and oxygen saturation measurement in less than 1 m 40s (96% of symptom diaries).,Custom algorithms, based on the self-monitoring data collected during the first 50 days of use, were developed to personalise alert thresholds.,Strategies and tools aimed at refining a digital health intervention require iterative use to enable convergence on an optimal, usable design.,‘Continuous improvement’ allowed feedback from users to have an immediate impact on the design of the system (e.g., collection of quality data), resulting in high compliance with self-monitoring over a prolonged period of time (12-month).,Health professionals were prompted by prioritisation algorithms to review patient data, which led to their regular use of the remote monitoring website throughout the trial.,Trial registration: ISRCTN40367841.,Registered 17/10/2012.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic inflammatory disease, which is associated with various comorbidities including osteoporosis.,Interleukin(IL)-17 has been reported to play important roles in the pathogenesis of COPD and also associated with bone destruction in inflammatory diseases.,However, the role of IL-17A in COPD-related osteoporosis is yet unknown.,The purpose of our study was to investigate the potential contribution of IL-17A in COPD-related bone loss.,We examined the bone mass and bone microarchitecture in wild-type and IL-17A-/- mice exposed to long-term cigarette smoke (CS).,Osteoclast activities and the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) in bone tissues were assessed, and the blood levels of inflammatory cytokines were measured.,Less bone loss as well as attenuated emphysema were shown in IL-17A-/- mice compared with wild-type mice.,CS-exposed IL-17A-/- mice had decreased TRAP+ osteoclast numbers and lower RANKL expression compared with CS-exposed wild-type mice.,Inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and IL-1β in circulation were decreased in IL-17A-/- mice exposed to CS compared with wild-type mice.,This study indicates that IL-17A is involved in CS-induced bone loss and may be a common link between COPD and osteoporosis.

Cigarette smoking-induced oxidant-antioxidant imbalance is a factor that contributes to the pathogenesis of COPD through epithelial cell apoptosis.,Irisin is a skeletal muscle cell-derived myokine associated with physical activity.,Irisin is also known to decrease oxidant-induced apoptosis in patients with diabetes mellitus.,However, the correlation between irisin and emphysema in COPD and its role in epithelial cell apoptosis remains unknown.,Forty patients with COPD were enrolled in this study.,Pulmonary function tests and measurements of the percentage of low-attenuation area on high-resolution computed tomography images were performed, and the results were evaluated for correlation with serum irisin levels.,The effect of irisin on cigarette-smoke extract-induced A549 cell apoptosis and the expression of Nrf2, a transcription factor for antioxidants, was also examined in vitro.,Serum irisin levels were significantly correlated with lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide divided by alveolar volume (r=0.56, P<0.01) and percentage of low-attenuation area (r=−0.79, P<0.01).,Moreover, irisin significantly enhanced Nrf2 expression (P<0.05) and reduced cigarette-smoke extract-induced A549 cell apoptosis (P<0.05).,Decreased serum irisin levels are related to emphysema in patients with COPD and involved in epithelial apoptosis, resulting in emphysema.,Irisin could be a novel treatment for emphysema in patients with COPD.

COPD self-management is a complex behavior influenced by many factors.,Despite scientific evidence that better disease outcomes can be achieved by enhancing self-management, many COPD patients do not respond to self-management interventions.,To move toward more effective self-management interventions, knowledge of characteristics associated with activation for self-management is needed.,The purpose of this study was to identify key patient and disease characteristics of activation for self-management.,An explorative cross-sectional study was conducted in primary and secondary care in patients with COPD.,Data were collected through questionnaires and chart reviews.,The main outcome was activation for self-management, measured with the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM).,Independent variables were sociodemographic variables, self-reported health status, depression, anxiety, illness perception, social support, disease severity, and comorbidities.,A total of 290 participants (age: 67.2±10.3; forced expiratory volume in 1 second predicted: 63.6±19.2) were eligible for analysis.,While poor activation for self-management (PAM-1) was observed in 23% of the participants, only 15% was activated for self-management (PAM-4).,Multiple linear regression analysis revealed six explanatory determinants of activation for self-management (P<0.2): anxiety (β: −0.35; −0.6 to −0.1), illness perception (β: −0.2; −0.3 to −0.1), body mass index (BMI) (β: −0.4; −0.7 to −0.2), age (β: −0.1; −0.3 to −0.01), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage (2 vs 1 β: −3.2; −5.8 to −0.5; 3 vs 1 β: −3.4; −7.1 to 0.3), and comorbidities (β: 0.8; −0.2 to 1.8), explaining 17% of the variance.,This study showed that only a minority of COPD patients is activated for self-management.,Although only a limited part of the variance could be explained, anxiety, illness perception, BMI, age, disease severity, and comorbidities were identified as key determinants of activation for self-management.,This knowledge enables health care professionals to identify patients at risk of inadequate self-management, which is essential to move toward targeting and tailoring of self-management interventions.,Future studies are needed to understand the complex causal mechanisms toward change in self-management.

The prevalence of Non Communicable Diseases (NCDs) is still unknown in Nepal.,The Ministry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal has not yet formulated policy regarding NCDs in the absence of evidence based finding.,The study aims to find out the hospital based prevalence of NCDs in Nepal, thus directing the concerned authorities at policy level.,A cross sectional study was conducted to identify the hospital based prevalence of 4 NCDs (cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), wherein 400 indoor patients admitted during 2009 were randomly selected from each of the 31 selected health institutions which included all non-specialist tertiary level hospitals outside the Kathmandu valley (n = 25), all specialist tertiary level hospitals in the country (n = 3) and 3 non-specialist tertiary level hospitals inside the Kathmandu valley.,In case of Kathmandu valley, 3 non-specialist health institutions- one central hospital, one medical college and one private hospital were randomly selected.,The main analyses are based on the 28 non-specialist hospitals.,Univariate (frequency and percentage) and bivariate (cross-tabulation) analysis were used.,In non-specialist institutions, the hospital based NCD prevalence was 31%.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (43%) was the most common NCD followed by cardiovascular disease (40%), diabetes mellitus (12%) and cancer (5%).,Ovarian (14%), stomach (14%) and lung cancer (10%) were the main cancers accounting for 38% of distribution.,Majority of CVD cases were hypertension (47%) followed by cerebrovascular accident (16%), congestive cardiac failure (11%), ischemic heart disease (7%), rheumatic heart disease (5%) and myocardial infarction (2%).,CVD was common in younger age groups while COPD in older age groups.,Majority among males (42%) and females (45%) were suffering from COPD.,The study was able to reveal that Nepal is also facing the surging burden of NCDs similar to other developing nations in South East Asia.,Furthermore, the study has provided a background data on NCDs in Nepal which should prove useful for the concerned organizations to focus and contribute towards the prevention, control and reduction of NCD burden and its risk factors.

Improvement in the daily physical activity (PA) is important for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,However, the effects of pharmacologic treatment on PA are not well understood.,We evaluated the effects of additional medications, including bronchodilator with or without inhaled corticosteroid, based on airflow limitation and breathlessness on the PA in COPD patients and the factors that could predict or affect the improvement in PA.,A prospective non-randomized observational study was employed.,Twenty-one COPD subjects without any other diseases that might reduce PA were recruited.,The PA was measured with a triaxial accelerometer for 2 weeks, and pulmonary function tests and incremental shuttle walking tests were administered before and after 4-week treatment with an additional medication.,Bronchodilation was obtained by additional medication.,The mean values of PA evaluated by metabolic equivalents (METs) at ≥3.0 METs and the duration of PA at ≥3.0 METs and ≥3.5 METs were improved by medication.,The % change in the duration of PA at ≥3.5 METs was significantly correlated with the baseline functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume, and inspiratory capacity/total lung capacity.,However, the % change in the duration of PA at any intensity was not correlated with the % changes of any values of the pulmonary function tests or incremental shuttle walking test except the PA at ≥2.5 METs with FRC.,Medication could improve the PA in patients with COPD, especially at a relatively high intensity of activity when medication was administered based on airflow limitation and breathlessness.,The improvement was seen in the patients with better baseline lung volume, but was not correlated with the improvements in the pulmonary function tests or exercise capacity.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the long-acting β2-agonist formoterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational phase III study randomized patients ≥ 40 years of age with moderate-to-severe COPD to inhaled formoterol 4.5 or 9 μg twice daily (bid) via Turbuhaler® or placebo for 12 weeks.,Salbutamol 100 μg/actuation via pMDI was permitted as reliever medication.,The primary outcome variable was change (ratio) from baseline to treatment period in FEV1 60-min post-dose.,613 patients received treatment (formoterol 4.5 μg n = 206; 9 μg n = 199; placebo n = 208); 539 (87.9%) male; 324 (52.9%) Japanese and 289 (47.1%) European.,End of study increases in FEV1 60-min post-dose were significantly greater (p < 0.001 for both) with formoterol 4.5 and 9 μg bid (113% of baseline for both) than with placebo, as were all secondary outcome measures.,The proportion of patients with an improvement in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score of ≥ 4 was 50.2% for formoterol 4.5 μg (p = 0.0682 vs. placebo), 59.2% (p = 0.0004) for 9 μg, and 41.3% for placebo.,Reduction in reliever medication use was significantly greater with formoterol vs. placebo (9 μg: -0.548, p < 0.001; 4.5 μg: -0.274, p = 0.027), with 9 μg being significantly superior to 4.5 μg (-0.274, p = 0.029).,Formoterol was well tolerated with the incidence and type of adverse events not being different for the three groups.,Formoterol 4.5 μg and 9 μg bid was effective and well tolerated in patients with COPD; there was no difference between formoterol doses for the primary endpoint; however, an added value of formoterol 9 μg over 4.5 μg bid was observed for some secondary endpoints.,NCT00628862 (ClinicalTrials.gov); D5122C00001 (AstraZeneca Study code).

Past studies have shown that mean values of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) do not change significantly in COPD patients over a one-year period.,However, longer period follow-up studies are still lacking.,Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate plasma CRP and IL-6 concentration over three years in COPD patients and to test the association between these inflammatory mediators and disease outcome markers.,A cohort of 77 outpatients with stable COPD was evaluated at baseline, and 53 (mean FEV1, 56% predicted) were included in the prospective study.,We evaluated Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), six-minute walking distance (6MWD), and body mass index (BMI) at baseline and after three years.,Plasma concentration of IL-6 was measured by high sensitivity ELISA, and CRP was obtained by high sensitivity particle-enhanced immunonephelometry.,IL-6 increased significantly after 3 years compared to baseline measurements [0.8 (0.5-1.3) vs 2.4 (1.3-4.4) pg/ml; p < 0.001] and was associated with worse 6MWD performance.,In the Cox regression, increased IL-6 at baseline was associated with mortality [Hazard Ratio (95% CI) = 2.68 (0.13, 1.84); p = 0.02].,CRP mean values did not change [5 (1.6-7.9) vs 4.7 (1.7-10) pg/L; p = 0.84], although eleven patients (21%) presented with changes >3 mg/L in CRP after 3 years.,The systemic inflammatory process, evaluated by IL-6, seems to be persistent, progressive and associated with mortality and worse physical performance in COPD patients.,No.:NCT00605540

The association between disease markers and health status (HS) overtime is unclear.,The aim of this study was to verify the predictors of HS at baseline and after three years in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients.,Ninety-five consecutive COPD patients (66% male, age = 67 ± 9 y, FEV1 = 58 ± 23%) underwent the following evaluations at baseline and after three years: body composition, pulse oximetry (SpO2), six-minute walk distance (6MWD), Modified edical Research Council dyspnea scale (MMRC) and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).,The Charlson comorbidity index and BODE index were calculated.,COPD exacerbations during the follow-up were evaluated.,At baseline, age, gender, smoking, SpO2, BODE index or its components (BMI, MMRC, FEV1 and 6MWD), and Charlson index were included in a multiple linear regression analysis with the baseline SGRQ total score as the dependent variable.,After three years, we included the final values of the variables plus the number of exacerbations and the final SGRQ total score as the dependent variable.,SGRQ total score (42 ± 19% vs 44 ± 19%; p = 0.041) and activity domain (52 ± 21% vs 60 ± 22%; p < 0.001) deteriorated during follow-up.,At baseline, BODE index was selected as a predictor of SGRQ total score (R2 = 0.46; p < 0.001); after three years, BODE index and age were the predictors (R2 = 0.49; p < 0.001).,When the BODE index was replaced by its variables, MMRC was selected as the only variable associated with the SGRQ total score (R2 = 0.58; p < 0.001).,After three years, MMRC, FEV1 and number of exacerbations were selected as predictors of SGRQ total score (R2 = 0.63; p < 0.001).,HS deteriorated significantly over the three-year period and the predictors of HS do not change over time.,BODE index and dyspnea were predictors at baseline and after three years.,Exacerbation was also a predictor of HS after three years.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00605540

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory airway disease requiring frequent outpatient visits and lifelong management.,We aimed to evaluate the roles of frequent outpatient visits in prognosis of COPD.,We used claims data in the national medical insurance review system provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015.,A definition of COPD was used based on the diagnosis code and medication.,Frequent visitors were defined as subjects who visited the outpatient clinic for COPD three or more times per year.,Among 159,025 subjects, 117,483 (73.9%) were classified as frequent visitors.,Frequent visitors underwent pulmonary function tests and used various inhalers more often than did infrequent visitors.,The rates of COPD exacerbation requiring admission to a general ward, emergency room, or intensive care unit were significantly lower in frequent visitors than in infrequent visitors.,In multivariable analysis, frequent visits were identified as an independent factor preventing COPD exacerbation that required admission to a ward (odds ratio [OR], 0.387), emergency room, (OR, 0.558), or intensive care unit (OR, 0.39) (all P < 0.001).,In conclusion, we showed frequent outpatient visits reduce the risk of COPD exacerbation by 45-60%.

In the 2014 Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines, bronchiectasis was for the first time defined as a comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and this change has been retained in the 2015 update, which emphasizes the influence of bronchiectasis in the natural history of COPD.,The present meta-analysis was aimed at summarizing the impact of bronchiectasis on patients with COPD.,Databases including Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched comprehensively to identify all relevant human clinical studies published until August 2014.,Bronchiectasis was confirmed either by computed tomography or high-resolution computed tomography.,One or more clinicopathological or demographical characteristics, including age, sex, smoking history, daily sputum production, exacerbations, inflammatory biomarkers, lung function, and colonization by potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs), were compared between COPD patients with and without bronchiectasis.,Six observational studies with 881 patients were included in the meta-analysis.,The mean prevalence of bronchiectasis in patients with COPD was 54.3%, ranging from 25.6% to 69%.,Coexistence of bronchiectasis and COPD occurred more often in male patients with longer smoking history.,Patients with COPD and comorbid bronchiectasis had greater daily sputum production, more frequent exacerbation, poorer lung function, higher level of inflammatory biomarkers, more chronic colonization by PPMs, and higher rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolation.,In spite of the heterogeneity between included studies and detectable publication bias, this meta-analysis demonstrated the impact of bronchiectasis in patients with COPD in all directions, indicating that coexistence of bronchiectasis should be considered a pathological phenotype of COPD, which may have a predictive value.

‘Clinically important deterioration’ (CID) is a composite endpoint measuring worsening of the key clinical features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), namely lung function, patient-reported outcomes, and exacerbations.,ACLIFORM and AUGMENT were two 24-week, randomized, double-blind, phase III studies assessing twice-daily (BID) aclidinium bromide (AB) 400 μg/formoterol fumarate (FF) 12 μg.,This pooled post-hoc analysis assessed the effects of AB/FF 400/12 μg on both first and sustained CID events versus placebo and monotherapies in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,A first CID event was defined as the occurrence of a moderate/severe exacerbation or the worsening from baseline in ≥1 of the following: trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; ≥100 mL), Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score (≥1 unit), or St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (≥4 units).,A ‘sustained’ CID was defined as a worsening maintained at all subsequent visits from appearance to week 24 or a moderate/severe exacerbation at any time.,CID events were assessed at three visits (weeks 4, 12, and 24); trough FEV1 was also measured at weeks 1 and 18.,AB/FF 400/12 μg reduced the risk of a first CID event by 45% versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, p < 0.001), 18% versus FF 12 μg (HR 0.82, p < 0.01), and 15% versus AB 400 μg (HR 0.85, p < 0.05).,Similarly, AB/FF 400/12 μg reduced the risk of a sustained CID event by 48% versus placebo (HR 0.52, p < 0.001) and 22% versus FF 12 μg (HR 0.78, p < 0.01).,AB/FF 400/12 μg reduced the risk of a first or sustained CID event for all four components versus placebo (trough FEV1 and TDI, first and sustained CID, all p < 0.001; SGRQ first CID p < 0.001; SGRQ sustained CID, p < 0.01; exacerbations first and sustained CID, both p < 0.05) and TDI and SGRQ versus FF 12 μg (TDI, first and sustained CID both p < 0.05; SGRQ first CID p < 0.01), and SGRQ versus AB 400 μg (first CID, p < 0.05).,AB/FF 400/12 μg BID may provide greater airway stability and fewer exacerbations or deteriorations in lung function, health status, or dyspnea compared with placebo or monotherapies.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01462942 (ACLIFORM); registered 26 October 2011.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01437397 (AUGMENT); registered 19 September 2011.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-017-0583-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combining two long-acting bronchodilators with complementary mechanisms of action may provide treatment benefits to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that are greater than those derived from either treatment alone.,The efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting β2-agonist, in patients with moderate to severe COPD are presented.,In this 24-week double-blind study, 1692 patients with stable COPD were equally randomized to twice-daily treatment with FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg (ACL400/FOR12 FDC), FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 6 μg (ACL400/FOR6 FDC), aclidinium 400 μg, formoterol 12 μg, or placebo administered by a multidose dry powder inhaler (Genuair®/Pressair®)*.,Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 24 in 1-hour morning postdose FEV1 (FDCs versus aclidinium) and change from baseline to week 24 in morning predose (trough) FEV1 (FDCs versus formoterol).,Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24.,Safety and tolerability were also assessed.,At study end, improvements from baseline in 1-hour postdose FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC or ACL400/FOR6 FDC compared with aclidinium (108 mL and 87 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001).,Improvements in trough FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC versus formoterol (45 mL; p = 0.0102), a numerical improvement of 26 mL in trough FEV1 over formoterol was observed with ACL400/FOR6 FDC.,Significant improvements in both SGRQ total and TDI focal scores were observed in the ACL400/FOR12 FDC group at study end (p < 0.0001), with differences over placebo exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of ≥4 points and ≥1 unit, respectively.,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of the monotherapies.,Treatment with twice-daily aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg FDC provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation that was greater than either monotherapy; clinically significant improvements in dyspnea and health status were evident compared with placebo.,Aclidinium/formoterol FDC may be an effective and well tolerated new treatment option for patients with COPD.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01437397.,*Registered trademarks of Almirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain; for use within the US as Pressair® and Genuair® within all other licensed territories.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0123-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) represent a major burden for patients and health care systems.,Innovative sampling techniques have led to the identification of several pulmonary biomarkers.,Although some molecules are promising, their usefulness in clinical practice is not yet established.,Medline and Highwire databases were used to identify studies evaluating pulmonary sampled biomarkers in ECOPD.,We combined 3 terms for ECOPD, 3 for biomarkers and 6 for the sampling method.,Seventy-nine studies were considered eligible for inclusion in the review and were analyzed further.,Pulmonary biomarkers sampled with non-invasive, semi-invasive and invasive methods were evaluated for their potential to illustrate the disease’s clinical course, to correlate to clinical variables and to predict clinical outcomes, ECOPD etiology and response to treatment.,According to published data several pulmonary biomarkers assessed in ECOPD have the potential to illustrate the natural history of disease through the modification of their levels.,Among the clinically relevant molecules, those that have been studied the most and appear to be promising are spontaneous and induced sputum biomarkers for reflecting clinical severity and symptomatic recovery, as well as for directing towards an etiological diagnosis.,Current evidence on the clinical usefulness of exhaled breath condensate and bronchoalveolar lavage biomarkers in ECOPD is limited.,In conclusion, pulmonary biomarkers have the potential to provide information on the mechanisms underlying ECOPD, and several correlate with clinical variables and outcomes.,However, on the basis of published evidence, no single molecule is adequately validated for wide clinical use.,Clinical trials that incorporate biomarkers in decisional algorithms are required.

Because chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition, the identification of specific clinical phenotypes is key to developing more effective therapies.,To explore if the persistence of systemic inflammation is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COPD we assessed patients recruited to the well-characterized ECLIPSE cohort (NCT00292552).,Six inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood (white blood cells (WBC) count and CRP, IL-6, IL-8, fibrinogen and TNF-α levels) were quantified in 1,755 COPD patients, 297 smokers with normal spirometry and 202 non-smoker controls that were followed-up for three years.,We found that, at baseline, 30% of COPD patients did not show evidence of systemic inflammation whereas 16% had persistent systemic inflammation.,Even though pulmonary abnormalities were similar in these two groups, persistently inflamed patients during follow-up had significantly increased all-cause mortality (13% vs. 2%, p<0.001) and exacerbation frequency (1.5 (1.5) vs.,0.9 (1.1) per year, p<0.001) compared to non-inflamed ones.,As a descriptive study our results show associations but do not prove causality.,Besides this, the inflammatory response is complex and we studied only a limited panel of biomarkers, albeit they are those investigated by the majority of previous studies and are often and easily measured in clinical practice.,Overall, these results identify a novel systemic inflammatory COPD phenotype that may be the target of specific research and treatment.

Performing lung function test in geriatric patients has never been an easy task.,With well-established evidence indicating impaired small airway function and air trapping in patients with geriatric COPD, utilizing forced oscillation technique (FOT) as a supplementary tool may aid in the assessment of lung function in this population.,To study the use of FOT in the assessment of airflow limitation and air trapping in geriatric COPD patients.,A cross-sectional study in a public hospital in Hong Kong.,ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01553812.,Geriatric patients who had spirometry-diagnosed COPD were recruited, with both FOT and plethysmography performed.,“Resistance” and “reactance” FOT parameters were compared to plethysmography for the assessment of air trapping and airflow limitation.,In total, 158 COPD subjects with a mean age of 71.9±0.7 years and percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 53.4±1.7 L were recruited.,FOT values had a good correlation (r=0.4-0.7) to spirometric data.,In general, X values (reactance) were better than R values (resistance), showing a higher correlation with spirometric data in airflow limitation (r=0.07-0.49 vs 0.61-0.67), small airway (r=0.05-0.48 vs 0.56-0.65), and lung volume (r=0.12-0.29 vs 0.43-0.49).,In addition, resonance frequency (Fres) and frequency dependence (FDep) could well identify the severe type (percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second <50%) of COPD with high sensitivity (0.76, 0.71) and specificity (0.72, 0.64) (area under the curve: 0.8 and 0.77, respectively).,Moreover, X values could stratify different severities of air trapping, while R values could not.,FOT may act as a simple and accurate tool in the assessment of severity of airflow limitation, small and central airway function, and air trapping in patients with geriatric COPD who have difficulties performing conventional lung function test.,Moreover, reactance parameters were better than resistance parameters in correlation with air trapping.

This review summarizes the long-term clinical outcomes associated with β-agonist and anticholinergic bronchodilator use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Pooled data from randomized placebo-controlled trials of at least three months duration were used to evaluate the risk for COPD hospitalizations, respiratory mortality, and total mortality.,The results show that anticholinergic use is associated with a 30% reduction in COPD hospitalizations, a 70% reduction in respiratory mortality, and without a significant effect on total mortality.,In contrast, β-agonist use had no effect on COPD hospitalizations and was associated with a two-fold increased risk for respiratory death compared with placebo.,When the two bronchodilators were directly compared with each other, β-agonists were associated with a two-fold increased risk for COPD hospitalization and a five-fold increased risk for total mortality compared with anticholinergics.,When β-agonists were added to either anticholinergic use or inhaled corticosteroid use alone, there was no significant improvement in any long-term clinical outcome.,These results indicate that anticholinergics should be the bronchodilator of choice in COPD, while β-agonists may be associated with poorer disease control.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text,Presently, there is no recommendation on how to assess functional status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.,This study aimed to summarize and systematically evaluate these measures.,Studies on measures of COPD patients’ functional status published before the end of January 2015 were included using a search filters in PubMed and Web of Science, screening reference lists of all included studies, and cross-checking against some relevant reviews.,After title, abstract, and main text screening, the remaining was appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist.,All measures from these studies were rated according to best-evidence synthesis and the best-rated measures were selected.,A total of 6447 records were found and 102 studies were reviewed, suggesting 44 performance-based measures and 14 patient-reported measures.,The majority of the studies focused on internal consistency, reliability, and hypothesis testing, but only 21% of them employed good or excellent methodology.,Their common weaknesses include lack of checks for unidimensionality, inadequate sample sizes, no prior hypotheses, and improper methods.,On average, patient-reported measures perform better than performance-based measures.,The best-rated patient-reported measures are functional performance inventory (FPI), functional performance inventory short form (FPI-SF), living with COPD questionnaire (LCOPD), COPD activity rating scale (CARS), University of Cincinnati dyspnea questionnaire (UCDQ), shortness of breath with daily activities (SOBDA), and short-form pulmonary functional status scale (PFSS-11), and the best-rated performance-based measures are exercise testing: 6-minute walk test (6MWT), endurance treadmill test, and usual 4-meter gait speed (usual 4MGS).,Further research is needed to evaluate the reliability and validity of performance-based measures since present studies failed to provide convincing evidence.,FPI, FPI-SF, LCOPD, CARS, UCDQ, SOBDA, PFSS-11, 6MWT, endurance treadmill test, and usual 4MGS performed well and are preferable to assess functional status of COPD patients.

There are very few studies that have investigated the muscle strength and endurance of upper limbs (UL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We undertook this study to measure and compare the skeletal muscle strength and endurance of UL in COPD patients and age matched healthy controls and to study the association between lung function parameters and UL muscle strength and endurance.,Forty one COPD patients and 45 height and weight matched healthy subjects of the same age group were studied.,UL skeletal muscle strength and endurance were measured using the hand grip dynamometer test.,Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced expiratory flow during 25-75% FVC (FEF25-75%) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured.,The handgrip muscle strength and endurance between the two groups were compared and correlations between FVC and FEV1 with muscle strength and endurance were analyzed.,The mean handgrip strength and mean muscle endurance in COPD patients were significantly lesser than the normal subjects in both males and females (P<0.001).,There was significant positive correlation between muscle strength and FVC in males (r2=0.32, P<0.05); and between muscle strength and FEV1 in females (r2=0.20, P<0.05).,The study showed that the handgrip muscle strength decreases as the FVC and FEV1 decrease in patients with COPD.,Identifying those patients who have reduced strength and endurance will allow early interventions targeted at improving the quality of life of the patient.

The potential detrimental effects of steroids on the immune system to fight viral infections had always been a concern for patients on long term steroids in chronic conditions.,A recent warning from WHO on systemic corticosteroid use amid COVID-19 raised suspicion among public and healthcare professionals regarding the safety of steroid use during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.,The corticosteroids (inhaled and oral) are commonly prescribed in the management of asthma and COPD patients and any unsolicited changes in medications use may lead to potentially severe exacerbations and may risk patient lives.,This article provides a critical review of clinical evidence and offers a detailed discussion on the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in asthma and COPD patients, both with and without COVID-19.

Chronic infections are associated with exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The major objective of the management of these patients is the prevention and effective treatment of exacerbations.,Patients that have increased sputum production, associated with purulence and worsening shortness of breath, are the ones that will benefit from antibiotic therapy.,It is important to give the appropriate antibiotic therapy to prevent treatment failure, relapse, and the emergence of resistant pathogens.,In some patients, systemic corticosteroids are also indicated to improve symptoms.,In order to identify which patients are more likely to benefit from these therapies, clinical guidelines recommend stratifying patients based on their risk factor associated with poor outcome or recurrence.,It has been identified that patients with more severe disease, recurrent infection and presence of purulent sputum are the ones that will be more likely to benefit from this therapy.,Another approach related to disease prevention could be the use of prophylactic antibiotics during steady state condition.,Some studies have evaluated the continuous or the intermittent use of antibiotics in order to prevent exacerbations.,Due to increased bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the presence of side effects, several antibiotics have been developed to be nebulized for both treatment and prevention of acute exacerbations.,There is a need to design long-term studies to evaluate these interventions in the natural history of the disease.,The purpose of this publication is to review our understanding of the role of bacterial infection in patients with COPD exacerbation, the role of antibiotics, and future interventions.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an evolving infectious disease that dramatically spread all over the world in the early part of 2020.,No studies have yet summarized the potential severity and mortality risks caused by COVID-19 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and we update information in smokers.,We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to March 24, 2020.,Data were extracted by two independent authors in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.,Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.,We synthesized a narrative from eligible studies and conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to calculate pooled prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).,In total, 123 abstracts were screened and 61 full-text manuscripts were reviewed.,A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, which included a total of 2473 confirmed COVID-19 patients.,All studies were included in the meta-analysis.,The crude case fatality rate of COVID-19 was 7.4%.,The pooled prevalence rates of COPD patients and smokers in COVID-19 cases were 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%) and 9% (95% CI, 4%-14%) respectively.,COPD patients were at a higher risk of more severe disease (risk of severity = 63%, (22/35) compared to patients without COPD 33.4% (409/1224) [calculated RR, 1.88 (95% CI, 1.4-2.4)].,This was associated with higher mortality (60%).,Our results showed that 22% (31/139) of current smokers and 46% (13/28) of ex-smokers had severe complications.,The calculated RR showed that current smokers were 1.45 times more likely [95% CI: 1.03-2.04] to have severe complications compared to former and never smokers.,Current smokers also had a higher mortality rate of 38.5%.,Although COPD prevalence in COVID-19 cases was low in current reports, COVID-19 infection was associated with substantial severity and mortality rates in COPD.,Compared to former and never smokers, current smokers were at greater risk of severe complications and higher mortality rate.,Effective preventive measures are required to reduce COVID-19 risk in COPD patients and current smokers.

Viral exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), commonly caused by rhinovirus (RV) infections, are poorly controlled by current therapies.,This is due to a lack of understanding of the underlying immunopathological mechanisms.,Human studies have identified a number of key immune responses that are associated with RV-induced exacerbations including neutrophilic inflammation, expression of inflammatory cytokines and deficiencies in innate anti-viral interferon.,Animal models of COPD exacerbation are required to determine the contribution of these responses to disease pathogenesis.,We aimed to develop a short-term mouse model that reproduced the hallmark features of RV-induced exacerbation of COPD.,Evaluation of complex protocols involving multiple dose elastase and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration combined with RV1B infection showed suppression rather than enhancement of inflammatory parameters compared with control mice infected with RV1B alone.,Therefore, these approaches did not accurately model the enhanced inflammation associated with RV infection in patients with COPD compared with healthy subjects.,In contrast, a single elastase treatment followed by RV infection led to heightened airway neutrophilic and lymphocytic inflammation, increased expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10)/IP-10 (interferon γ-induced protein 10) and CCL5 [chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5]/RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted), mucus hypersecretion and preliminary evidence for increased airway hyper-responsiveness compared with mice treated with elastase or RV infection alone.,In summary, we have developed a new mouse model of RV-induced COPD exacerbation that mimics many of the inflammatory features of human disease.,This model, in conjunction with human models of disease, will provide an essential tool for studying disease mechanisms and allow testing of novel therapies with potential to be translated into clinical practice.,The present study describes a new short-term mouse model of rhinovirus (RV)-induced exacerbation of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) which will facilitate insight into disease mechanisms and could provide a more efficient tool to test novel therapies with potential to be translated into clinical practice.

It has been proposed that the development of COPD is driven by premature aging/premature senescence of lung parenchyma cells.,There are data suggesting that old mice develop a greater inflammatory and lower anti-oxidant response after cigarette smoke compared to young mice, but whether these differences actually translate into greater levels of disease is unknown.,We exposed C57Bl/6 female mice to daily cigarette smoke for 6 months starting at age 3 months (Ayoung@) or age 12 months (Aold@), with air-exposed controls.,There were no differences in measures of airspace size between the two control groups and cigarette smoke induced exactly the same amount of emphysema in young and old.,The severity of smoke-induced small airway remodeling using various measures was identical in both groups.,Smoke increased numbers of tissue macrophages and neutrophils and levels of 8-hydroxyguanosine, a marker of oxidant damage, but there were no differences between young and old.,Gene expression studies using laser capture microdissected airways and parenchyma overall showed a trend to lower levels in older animals and a somewhat lesser response to cigarette smoke in both airways and parenchyma but the differences were usually not marked.,Telomere length was greatest in young control mice and was decreased by both smoking and age.,The senescence marker p21Waf1 was equally upregulated by smoke in young and old, but p16INK4a, another senescence marker, was not upregulated at all.,We conclude, in this model, animal age does not affect the development of emphysema and small airway remodeling.

A widely applicable model of emphysema that allows efficient and sensitive quantification of injury is needed to compare potential therapies.,To establish such a model, we studied the relationship between elastase dose and the severity of emphysema in female C57BL/6J mice.,We compared alveolar fractal box dimension (DB), a new measure which is an assessment of the complexity of the tissue, with mean linear intercept (Lm), which is commonly used to estimate airspace size, for sensitivity and efficiency of measurement.,Emphysema was induced in female C57BL/6J mice by administering increasing intratracheal doses of porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE).,Changes in morphology and static lung compliance (CL) were examined 21 days later.,Correlation of DB with Lm was determined in histological sections of lungs exposed to PPE.,The inverse relationship between DB and Lm was supported by examining similar morphological sections from another experiment where the development of emphysema was studied 1 to 3 weeks after instillation of human neutrophil elastase (HNE).,Lm increased with PPE dose in a sigmoidal curve.,CL increased after 80 or 120 U/kg body weight (P < 0.05), but not after 40 U/kg, compared with the control.,DB progressively declined from 1.66 ± 0.002 (standard error of the mean) in controls, to 1.47 ± 0.006 after 120 U PPE/kg (P < 0.0001).,After PPE or HNE instillation, DB was inversely related to Lm (R = −0.95, P < 0.0001 and R = −0.84, P = 0.01, respectively), with a more negative slope of the relationship using HNE (P < 0.0001).,Intratracheal instillation of increasing doses of PPE yields a scale of progression from mild to severe emphysema.,DB correlates inversely with Lm after instillation of either PPE or HNE and yields a rapid, sensitive measure of emphysema after elastase instillation.

The potential for telehealth-based interventions to provide remote support, education and improve self-management for long-term conditions is increasingly recognised.,This trial aims to determine whether an intervention delivered through an easy-to-use tablet computer can improve the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by providing personalised self-management information and education.,The EDGE (sElf management anD support proGrammE) for COPD is a multicentre, randomised controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of an Internet-linked tablet computer-based intervention (the EDGE platform) in improving quality of life in patients with moderate to very severe COPD compared with usual care.,Eligible patients are randomly allocated to receive the tablet computer-based intervention or usual care in a 2:1 ratio using a web-based randomisation system.,Participants are recruited from respiratory outpatient clinics and pulmonary rehabilitation courses as well as from those recently discharged from hospital with a COPD-related admission and from primary care clinics.,Participants allocated to the tablet computer-based intervention complete a daily symptom diary and record clinical symptoms using a Bluetooth-linked pulse oximeter.,Participants allocated to receive usual care are provided with all the information given to those allocated to the intervention but without the use of the tablet computer or the facility to monitor their symptoms or physiological variables.,The primary outcome of quality of life is measured using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD patients (SGRQ-C) baseline, 6 and 12 months.,Secondary outcome measures are recorded at these intervals in addition to 3 months.,The Research Ethics Committee for Berkshire-South Central has provided ethical approval for the conduct of the study in the recruiting regions.,The results of the study will be disseminated through peer review publications and conference presentations.,Current controlled trials ISRCTN40367841.

Objective To test the effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services such that intervention and control groups have access to the same clinical care.,Design Researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.,Setting UK primary care (Lothian, Scotland).,Participants Adults with at least one admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the year before randomisation.,We excluded people who had other significant lung disease, who were unable to provide informed consent or complete the study, or who had other significant social or clinical problems.,Interventions Participants were recruited between 21 May 2009 and 28 March 2011, and centrally randomised to receive telemonitoring or conventional self monitoring.,Using a touch screen, telemonitoring participants recorded a daily questionnaire about symptoms and treatment use, and monitored oxygen saturation using linked instruments.,Algorithms, based on the symptom score, generated alerts if readings were omitted or breached thresholds.,Both groups received similar care from existing clinical services.,Main outcome measures The primary outcome was time to hospital admission due to COPD exacerbation up to one year after randomisation.,Other outcomes included number and duration of admissions, and validated questionnaire assessments of health related quality of life (using St George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ)), anxiety or depression (or both), self efficacy, knowledge, and adherence to treatment.,Analysis was intention to treat.,Results Of 256 patients completing the study, 128 patients were randomised to telemonitoring and 128 to usual care; baseline characteristics of each group were similar.,The number of days to admission did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.44).,Over one year, the mean number of COPD admissions was similar in both groups (telemonitoring 1.2 admissions per person (standard deviation 1.9) v control 1.1 (1.6); P=0.59).,Mean duration of COPD admissions over one year was also similar between groups (9.5 days per person (standard deviation 19.1) v 8.8 days (15.9); P=0.88).,The intervention had no significant effect on SGRQ scores between groups (68.2 (standard deviation 16.3) v 67.3 (17.3); adjusted mean difference 1.39 (95% confidence interval −1.57 to 4.35)), or on other questionnaire outcomes.,Conclusions In participants with a history of admission for exacerbations of COPD, telemonitoring was not effective in postponing admissions and did not improve quality of life.,The positive effect of telemonitoring seen in previous trials could be due to enhancement of the underpinning clinical service rather than the telemonitoring communication.,Trial registration ISRCTN96634935.,Funding: The trial was funded by an NHS applied research programme grant from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish government (ARPG/07/03).,The funder had no role in study design and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and the writing of the article and the decision to submit it for publication.,NHS Lothian supported the telemonitoring service and the clinical services.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the top five major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide.,Despite worldwide health care efforts, costs, and medical research, COPD figures demonstrate a continuously increasing tendency in mortality.,This is contrary to other top causes of death, such as neoplasm, accidents, and cardiovascular disease.,A major factor affecting COPD-related mortality is the acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).,Exacerbations and comorbidities contribute to the overall severity in individual patients.,Despite the underestimation by the physicians and the patients themselves, AECOPD is a really devastating event during the course of the disease, similar to acute myocardial infarction in patients suffering from coronary heart disease.,In this review, we focus on the evidence that supports the claim that AECOPD is the “stroke of the lungs”.,AECOPD can be viewed as: a Semicolon or disease’s full-stop period, Triggering a catastrophic cascade, usually a Relapsing and Overwhelming event, acting as a Killer, needing Emergent treatment.

Clinical guidelines for management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include recommendations based on high levels of evidence, but gaps exist in their implementation.,The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives of medical practitioners regarding implementation of six high-evidence recommendations for the management of people with COPD.,Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical practitioners involved with care of COPD patients in hospital and general practice.,Interviews sought medical practitioners’ experience regarding implementation of smoking cessation, influenza vaccination, pulmonary rehabilitation, guideline-based medications, long-term oxygen therapy for hypoxemia and plan and advice for future exacerbations.,Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.,Nine hospital-based medical practitioners and seven general practitioners participated.,Four major categories were identified which impacted on implementation of the target recommendations in the care of patients with COPD: (1) role clarity of the medical practitioner; (2) persuasive communication with the patient; (3) complexity of behavioral change required; (4) awareness and support available at multiple levels.,For some recommendations, strength in all four categories provided significant enablers supporting implementation.,However, with regard to pulmonary rehabilitation and plans and advice for future exacerbations, all identified categories that presented barriers to implementation.,This study of medical practitioner perspectives has indicated areas where significant barriers to the implementation of key evidence-based recommendations in COPD management persist.,Developing strategies to target the identified categories provides an opportunity to achieve greater implementation of those high-evidence recommendations in the care of people with COPD.

Increasing age is associated with poor prognosis in patients with COPD.,This analysis from the replicate Phase III OTEMTO® and TONADO® studies examined the efficacy and safety of tiotropium, a long-acting anticholinergic, combined with olodaterol, a long-acting β2-agonist, compared to monotherapies and placebo in patients with COPD aged 40 years to <65 years, 65 years to <75 years, 75 years to <85 years, and ≥85 years.,In these double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicenter, randomized studies, patients received tiotropium + olodaterol 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 5 μg or 2.5 μg (TONADO only), olodaterol 5 μg (TONADO only), or placebo (OTEMTO only).,This analysis used the approved doses of tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 μg, tiotropium 5 μg, and olodaterol 5 μg.,Primary end points at 12 weeks (OTEMTO) or 24 weeks (TONADO) included St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 hour to 3 hours (AUC0-3) response, and trough FEV1 response.,A total of 1,621 patients were randomized (40 years to <65 years, n=749; 65 years to <75 years, n=674; 75 years to <85 years, n=186; ≥85 years, n=12) in OTEMTO and 5,162 patients (40 years to <65 years, n=2,654; 65 years to <75 years, n=1,967; 75 to <85 years, n=528; ≥85 years, n=13) in TONADO.,FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 responses improved with tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 μg at 12 weeks and 24 weeks compared to monotherapies or placebo for all age groups.,SGRQ scores generally improved with tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 μg after 12 weeks in OTEMTO and improved after 24 weeks in all age groups in TONADO.,In all age groups receiving tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 μg compared to monotherapies or placebo, transition dyspnea index scores generally improved, while rescue medication usage improved.,No differences were noted in relative responses to treatment or safety when using tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 μg compared to monotherapies or placebo across all age groups.

Tiotropium is an anticholinergic bronchodilator for symptom relief and reducing exacerbations with an established safety profile in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Using data from the 4-year Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT®) study, we re-evaluated the safety of tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients who experienced recent myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure or unstable rhythm disorder during the study.,A post-hoc analysis of all-cause mortality and serious cardiac adverse events (cardiac SAEs), including cardiac deaths and death unknown, was conducted in patients who had experienced cardiac arrhythmia, MI or cardiac failure during UPLIFT® and who completed the study.,Descriptive analyses were performed.,Most patients experiencing cardiac events, for which they would have been excluded at baseline, remained in the trial.,Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a trend to later occurrence of cardiac SAEs with tiotropium HandiHaler® versus placebo.,Patients who experienced a cardiac event and continued in UPLIFT® were not found to be at subsequently increased risk of all-cause mortality or cardiac SAEs with tiotropium treatment.,Evaluation of deaths by major adverse cardiac events composite endpoints also showed that patients treated with tiotropium were not at increased risk of mortality or cardiac SAEs compared with placebo.,Risk of cardiac events, mortality or SAEs was not increased by tiotropium in patients experiencing cardiac events for which they would have been excluded at study baseline.,The findings support the cardiac safety of tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with COPD.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0216-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Special attention has emerged towards biomass smoke-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), providing new knowledge for prevention and therapeutic approach of non-smoker COPD patients.,However, the understanding of biomass smoke COPD is still limited and somewhat controversial.,The aim of the present study was to compare COPD exclusively caused by tobacco smoking with COPD exclusively caused by environmental or occupational exposures.,For this cross-sectional study, COPD patients were recruited from outpatient clinics and formed two groups: non-smoker COPD group (n=16) with exposure to biomass smoke who did not smoke cigarette and tobacco smoker COPD group (n=15) with people who did not report biomass smoke exposure.,Subjects underwent pulmonary function tests, thoracic high-resolution computed tomography, 6-min walk test, and sputum induction.,The non-smoker COPD group had biomass smoke exposure of 133.3±86 hour-years.,The tobacco COPD group smoked 48.5±27.4 pack-years.,Women were 62.5 and 66.7%, respectively, of non-smokers and smokers.,The non-smoker COPD group showed higher prevalence of dyspnea, lower arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), and lower arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2%) with similar spirometry results, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity.,Regarding inflammatory biomarkers, differences were detected in sputum number of lymphomononuclear cells and in sputum concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 with higher values in the smoker group.,Emphysema was more prevalent in the tobacco smoker group, which also showed higher relative bronchial wall thickness and lower lung density by quantitative analysis.,Biomass smoke induced more hypoxemia compared to tobacco in COPD patients with similar severity.

The contribution of occupational exposures to COPD and their interaction with cigarette smoking on clinical pattern of COPD remain underappreciated.,The aim of this study was to explore the contribution of occupational exposures on clinical pattern of COPD.,Cross-sectional data from a multicenter tertiary care cohort of 591 smokers or ex-smokers with COPD (median FEV1 49%) were analyzed.,Self-reported exposure to vapor, dust, gas or fumes (VDGF) at any time during the entire career was recorded.,VDGF exposure was reported in 209 (35%) subjects aged 31 to 88 years.,Several features were significantly associated with VDGF exposure: age (median 68 versus 64 years, p < 0.001), male gender (90% vs 76%; p < 0.0001), reported work-related respiratory disability (86% vs 7%, p < 0.001), current wheezing (71% vs 61%, p = 0.03) and hay fever (15.5% vs 8.5%, p < 0.01).,In contrast, current and cumulative smoking was less (p = 0.01) despite similar severity of airflow obstruction.,In this patient series of COPD patients, subjects exposed to VDGF were older male patients who reported more work-related respiratory disability, more asthma-like symptoms and atopy, suggesting that, even in smokers or ex-smokers with COPD, occupational exposures are associated with distinct patients characteristics.

This study aimed to investigate whether perioperative inhalations of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) might decrease the incidence of postoperative complications in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients with COPD who underwent pulmonary resections for primary lung cancer at our hospital between January 2013 and January 2016 to determine the association between the incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., prolonged air leakage and pneumonia) and the use of LABAs or LAMAs.,Thirty patients with COPD experienced postoperative complications (27.8%): Fourteen patients had prolonged air leakages (more than 7 days), ten patients developed pneumonia.,The frequency of these postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly higher among the patients with COPD (24/108 cases, 22.2%), compared with the frequency among non-COPD patients (15/224 cases, 6.7%).,Inhaled bronchodilators, such as LAMA or LABA, were prescribed for 34 of the 108 patients with COPD; the remaining 74 patients were not treated with bronchodilators.,Pulmonary complications were significant lower among the LAMA or LABA users (3/34 cases, 8.8%) than among the untreated COPD patients (21/74 cases, 28.4%).,For lung cancer patients with COPD, preoperative management using LABA or LAMA bronchodilators and smoking cessation can reduce the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgical lung resection.,LAMA or LABA inhalation might be useful for not only perioperative care, but also for the long-term survival of COPD patients after surgery.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by chronic inflammation of the airways and progressive destruction of lung parenchyma, a process that in most cases is initiated by cigarette smoking.,Several mechanisms are involved in the development of the disease: influx of inflammatory cells into the lung (leading to chronic inflammation of the airways), imbalance between proteolytic and anti-proteolytic activity (resulting in the destruction of healthy lung tissue) and oxidative stress.,Recently, an increasing number of data suggest a fourth important mechanism involved in the development of COPD: apoptosis of structural cells in the lung might possibly be an important upstream event in the pathogenesis of COPD.,There is an increase in apoptotic alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells in the lungs of COPD patients.,Since this is not counterbalanced by an increase in proliferation of these structural cells, the net result is destruction of lung tissue and the development of emphysema.,Data from animal models suggest a role for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in the induction of apoptosis of structural cells in the lung.,Other mediators of apoptosis, such as caspase-3 and ceramide, could be interesting targets to prevent apoptosis and the development of emphysema.,In this review, recent data on the role of apoptosis in COPD from both animal models as well as from studies on human subjects will be discussed.,The aim is to provide an up to date summary on the increasing knowledge on the role of apoptosis in COPD and pulmonary emphysema.