instructions
stringclasses 1
value | user
stringlengths 561
8.98k
| assistant
stringlengths 2
555
|
|---|---|---|
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | item 5. market for the registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock, the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index (201cs&p 500 index 201d) and our peer group (201cloews peer group 201d) for the five years ended december 31, 2015. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $100 on december 31, 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested..
- | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
loews common stock | 100.0 | 97.37 | 106.04 | 126.23 | 110.59 | 101.72
s&p 500 index | 100.0 | 102.11 | 118.45 | 156.82 | 178.29 | 180.75
loews peer group (a) | 100.0 | 101.59 | 115.19 | 145.12 | 152.84 | 144.70
(a) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries: ace limited, w.r. berkley corporation, the chubb corporation, energy transfer partners l.p., ensco plc, the hartford financial services group, inc., kinder morgan energy partners, l.p. (included through november 26, 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc.), noble corporation, spectra energy corp, transocean ltd. and the travelers companies, inc. dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967. regular dividends of $0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014..
what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015? 180.75
what was the price in 2010? | 100.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock, the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index. the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $100 on december 30, 2006, and that any dividends have been reinvested. the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock. comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts, inc., s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30, $100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29, $108.00 104.24 january 3, $97.26 january 2, $116.01 january 1, $190.41 101.84 december 31, $201.18 104.81.
company/index | december 30 2006 | december 29 2007 | january 3 2009 | january 2 2010 | january 1 2011 | december 31 2011
advance auto parts | $100.00 | $108.00 | $97.26 | $116.01 | $190.41 | $201.18
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 104.24 | 65.70 | 78.62 | 88.67 | 88.67
s&p retail index | 100.00 | 82.15 | 58.29 | 82.36 | 101.84 | 104.81
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock, the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index. the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $100 on december 30, 2006, and that any dividends have been reinvested. the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock. comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts, inc., s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30, $100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29, $108.00 104.24 january 3, $97.26 january 2, $116.01 january 1, $190.41 101.84 december 31, $201.18 104.81.
what was the price performance of the advance auto parts stock in january 2009? 97.26
and by how much did it change since 2006? | -2.74 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 19. income taxes (continued) capital loss carryforwards of $69 million and $90 million, which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013. at december 31, 2012 and 2011, the company had $95 million and $95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets, respectively, recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets. goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill. see note 9, goodwill, for further discussion. current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction. as of december 31, 2012, the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $102 million and $121 million, respectively, recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, respectively. as of december 31, 2011, the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $108 million and $102 million, respectively, recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, respectively. the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. the excess totaled $2125 million and $1516 million as of december 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation. the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits: year ended december 31, (dollar amounts in millions) 2012 2011 2010.
(dollar amounts in millions) | year ended december 31, 2012 | year ended december 31, 2011 | year ended december 31, 2010
balance at january 1 | $349 | $307 | $285
additions for tax positions of prior years | 4 | 22 | 10
reductions for tax positions of prior years | -1 (1) | -1 (1) | -17 (17)
additions based on tax positions related to current year | 69 | 46 | 35
lapse of statute of limitations | 2014 | 2014 | -8 (8)
settlements | -29 (29) | -25 (25) | -2 (2)
positions assumed in acquisitions | 12 | 2014 | 4
balance at december 31 | $404 | $349 | $307
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are $250 million, $226 million and $194 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, the company accrued interest and penalties of $3 million during 2012 and in total, as of december 31, 2012, had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $69 million. the company accrued interest and penalties of $10 million during 2011 and in total, as of december 31, 2011, had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $66 million. the company accrued interest and penalties of $8 million during 2010 and in total, as of december 31, 2010, had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $56 million. pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement, the company has been indemnified by barclays for $73 million and guggenheim for $6 million of unrecognized tax benefits. blackrock is subject to u.s. federal income tax, state and local income tax, and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions. tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s. federal income tax examination, tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination, and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom. with few exceptions, as of december 31, 2012, the company is no longer subject to u.s. federal, state, local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006. the internal revenue service (201cirs 201d) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011. in november 2011, the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years, and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined, it is not expected to be material. in july 2011, the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group, which blackrock acquired in december 2009. the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1, 2009, and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined, it is not expected to be material. the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions. the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006, new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008, and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009. no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california, new jersey and new york city. no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements..
what is the ratio of the balance at the end of 2012 to the beginning of 2010? 1.41754
what is that less 1? | 0.41754 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) december 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 on december 8, 2017, the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.13 per share payable on february 15, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1, 2018. stock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017. the cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31, 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $1.9 billion, at an average price per share of $12.12 (including a nominal amount of commissions). as of december 31, 2017, $246 million remained available for repurchase under the program. the common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method. a total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. restricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock. the company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010. 15. segments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business. during the third quarter of 2017, the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu. the management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer: us, andes, brazil, mcac and eurasia sbus. the company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus. all prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure. in february 2018, we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio, optimize our cost structure, and reduce our carbon intensity. the company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure. corporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in "corporate and other." also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation. the company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure. adjusted ptc, a non-gaap measure, is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; and (f) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations, and office consolidation. adjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities. the company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments. additionally, given its large number of businesses and complexity, the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results. revenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations, which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest, charges for certain management fees, and the write-off of intercompany balances, as applicable. all intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment. inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results. the following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated (in millions):.
year ended december 31, | total revenue 2017 | total revenue 2016 | total revenue 2015
us sbu | $3229 | $3429 | $3593
andes sbu | 2710 | 2506 | 2489
brazil sbu | 542 | 450 | 962
mcac sbu | 2448 | 2172 | 2353
eurasia sbu | 1590 | 1670 | 1875
corporate and other | 35 | 77 | 31
eliminations | -24 (24) | -23 (23) | -43 (43)
total revenue | $10530 | $10281 | $11260
.
what percentage was eurasia sbu of the total revenue in 2017? | 0.151 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) march 31, 2004 5. income taxes (continued) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% (34%) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits. of the total valuation allowance, approximately $2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions. the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized. 6. commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no. 45, guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees, including guarantees of indebtedness of others, and interpretation of fasb statements no. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no. 34 (fin no. 45) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses. these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no. 5, accounting for contingencies, by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees, even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote. the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor. product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale. the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards. while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers, its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates. operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision. patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions, the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products. the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims. the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions. under the provisions of fin no. 45, intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only. as of march 31, 2004, the company had entered into leases for its facilities, including its primary operating facility in danvers, massachusetts, with terms through fiscal 2010. the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005. total rent expense under these leases, included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, was approximately $856000, $823000 and $821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. during the fiscal year ended march 31, 2000, the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $644000 for the lease of office furniture. these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased. rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31, 2002 and 2003 was approximately $215000 and $127000 respectively. during fiscal 2000, the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $221000. this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased. future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31, 2004 are approximately as follows (in thousands):.
year ending march 31, | operating leases
2005 | $781
2006 | 776
2007 | 769
2008 | 772
2009 | 772
thereafter | 708
total future minimum lease payments | $4578
from time-to-time, the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types. while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management, in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel, presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on the company..
what is the last year included in the remaining terms of the facility leases? | 2010.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | item 7. management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america, africa and europe. our operations are organized into four reportable segments: 2022 exploration and production (201ce&p 201d) which explores for, produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis. 2022 oil sands mining (201cosm 201d) which mines, extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta, canada, and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas (201cig 201d) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas, such as liquefied natural gas (201clng 201d) and methanol, on a worldwide basis. 2022 refining, marketing & transportation (201crm&t 201d) which refines, markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products, primarily in the midwest, upper great plains, gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states. certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business. these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates, 201d 201cbelieves, 201d 201cestimates, 201d 201cexpects, 201d 201ctargets, 201d 201cplans, 201d 201cprojects, 201d 201ccould, 201d 201cmay, 201d 201cshould, 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain. in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited (201cegholdings 201d). as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, effective may 1, 2007, we ceased consolidating egholdings. our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. unless specifically noted, amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1, 2007, include amounts related to the minority interests. management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1. business, item 1a. risk factors, item 6. selected financial data and item 8. financial statements and supplementary data. overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows. prices were volatile in 2009, but not as much as in the previous year. prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below..
benchmark | 2009 | 2008 | 2007
wti crude oil (dollars per barrel) | $62.09 | $99.75 | $72.41
dated brent crude oil (dollars per barrel) | $61.67 | $97.26 | $72.39
henry hub natural gas (dollars per mcf) (a) | $3.99 | $9.04 | $6.86
henry hub natural gas (dollars per mcf) (a) $3.99 $9.04 $6.86 (a) first-of-month price index. crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand, a declining dollar, ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil, and geopolitical risk. later in 2008, crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s. dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession. the price decrease continued into 2009, but reversed after dropping below $33.98 in february, ending the year at $79.36. our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour, which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does. sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values. our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark. the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $0.42 in 2009 compared to $2.49 in 2008 and $0.02 in 2007..
what was the change in the average wti crude oil benchmark from 2007 to 2009? -10.32
and what was that average wti crude oil benchmark in 2007? 72.41
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2007 amount, in percentage? | -0.14252 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation, the nasdaq stock market (u.s.) index and the peer group.
- | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2016
lkq corporation | $100 | $140 | $219 | $187 | $197 | $204
s&p 500 index | $100 | $113 | $147 | $164 | $163 | $178
peer group | $100 | $111 | $140 | $177 | $188 | $217
this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a, shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934, whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing, except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference. information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31, 2016 included in part iii, item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference..
what was the change in the return of the lkq corporation from 2011 to 2016? | 104.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) 13. common stock (continued) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program (the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019). under the nonemployee directors program, upon a director 2019s initial election to the board, the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $0.2 million, not to exceed 20000 shares. these grants vest over three years from the date of grant, subject to the director 2019s continued service. in addition, annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock, or a combination thereof, provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $0.2 million. these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant. under the nonemployee directors program, an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance. the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees (collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019). under the espp, eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% (85%) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase. under the espp, employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% (12%) of their compensation for common stock purchases, subject to certain limitations. the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states, to the extent permitted by local law. the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code. the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares. the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables. the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s. treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award. expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock. the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award, as well as historical exercise behavior, and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding. the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% (6.0%). the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods: option awards.
- | 2016 | 2015 | 2014
average risk-free interest rate | 1.1% (1.1%) | 1.4% (1.4%) | 1.5% (1.5%)
expected dividend yield | none | none | none
expected volatility | 33% (33%) | 30% (30%) | 31% (31%)
expected life (years) | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6
fair value per share | $31.00 | $18.13 | $11.75
.
what was the change in the fair value per share from 2014 to 2016? 19.25
and what was that fair value in 2014? 11.75
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 fair value, in percentage? | 1.6383 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9. acquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2, 2012, the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us. on march 9, 2012, we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction, pursuant to which we acquired, among other things, certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar. in addition, during the fourth quarter 2011, we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement (the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint, including, but not limited to, issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar. the total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $2.860 billion. this amount includes $1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction, $1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction, and the net payment of $114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement. see note 16 for further information. as a result of these acquisitions, we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date, including $102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets. subsequently, in the third quarter 2013, this uncertain tax position was resolved and $102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax (provision) benefit, net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended december 31, 2013. 10. discontinued operations as of december 31, 2013, blockbuster had ceased all material operations. accordingly, our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations, unless otherwise noted. during the years ended december 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the revenue from our discontinued operations was $503 million, $1.085 billion and $974 million, respectively. 201cincome (loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $54 million, $62 million and $3 million, respectively. in addition, 201cincome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $47 million, $37 million and $7 million, respectively. as of december 31, 2013, the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following: december 31, 2013 (in thousands).
- | as of december 31 2013 (in thousands)
current assets from discontinued operations | $68239
noncurrent assets from discontinued operations | 9965
current liabilities from discontinued operations | -49471 (49471)
long-term liabilities from discontinued operations | -19804 (19804)
net assets from discontinued operations | $8929
.
in 2013, what was the total expense related to discontinued operations? | 7.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | part iii item 10. directors, executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10, other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i, item 1 of this report, see 201celection of directors, 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors, 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 (a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance, 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year. for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers, see part i, item 1. of this report. item 11. executive compensation for the information required by this item 11, see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis, 201d 201ccompensation committee report, 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. item 12. security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock, see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31, 2015 regarding our equity plans: plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) (b) (c) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $86.98 4446967 item 13. certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence for the information required by this item 13, see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. item 14. principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14, see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference..
plan category | number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights (a) (b) | weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights | number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans (excludingsecurities reflected in column (a)) (c)
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 1442912 | $86.98 | 4446967
part iii item 10. directors, executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10, other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i, item 1 of this report, see 201celection of directors, 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors, 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 (a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance, 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year. for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers, see part i, item 1. of this report. item 11. executive compensation for the information required by this item 11, see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis, 201d 201ccompensation committee report, 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. item 12. security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock, see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31, 2015 regarding our equity plans: plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) (b) (c) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $86.98 4446967 item 13. certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence for the information required by this item 13, see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference. item 14. principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14, see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting, which information is incorporated herein by reference..
what is the total value of the options, warrants and rights that remain available for future issuance? 386797189.66
what about in millions? | 386.79719 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances, which amounted to $1926.8 mil- lion at december 31, 2007. as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow, the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks. there were no loans outstanding as of december 31, 2007 and these balances were invested in short term, high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal. leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates. several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years. future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31, 2012, and thereafter in the aggregate, are as follows (in thousands):.
2008 | 83382
2009 | 63060
2010 | 35269
2011 | 21598
2012 | 14860
thereafter | 30869
total | $249038
in addition, the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis. rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $106.4 million, $81.5 million and $61.1 million, respectively. data processing and maintenance services agreements. the company has agreements with various vendors, which expire between 2008 and 2017, for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions. the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $888.3 million as of december 31, 2007. however, this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate, the introduction of significant new technologies, or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs. (17) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger (note 6), fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial, inc. employee stock purchase plan (espp). subsequent to the certegy merger, the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial, inc. plan. under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments, eligible employees may voluntarily purchase, at current market prices, shares of fnf 2019s (prior to the certegy merger) or fis 2019s (post certegy merger) common stock through payroll deductions. pursuant to the espp, employees may contribute an amount between 3% (3%) and 15% (15%) of their base salary and certain commissions. shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions. the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp. the company recorded an expense of $15.2 million, $13.1 million and $11.1 million, respectively, for the years ended december 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp. fidelity national information services, inc. and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 (continued).
what was the rent expense in 2007? 106.4
and what was it in 2006? 81.5
what was, then, the change over the year? 24.9
what was the rent expense in 2006? | 81.5 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $311 million, or 4% (4%), compared to 2010. the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs (primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds) and approximately $75 million for training and logistics solutions programs. partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $165 million from production on the lcs program. mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $68 million, or 10% (10%), compared to 2010. the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs (including the terminated presidential helicopter program) and approximately $40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions. partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010. adjustments not related to volume, including net profit rate adjustments described above, were approximately $55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010. backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs (primarily mh-60 and lcs), partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs (primarily aegis). backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs. trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs. operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance. space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development, design, engineering, and production of satellites, strategic and defensive missile systems, and space transportation systems. space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems. space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system (sbirs), advanced extremely high frequency (aehf) system, mobile user objective system (muos), global positioning satellite (gps) iii system, geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series (goes-r), trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile, and orion. operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance (ula), which provides expendable launch services for the u.s. government, united space alliance (usa), which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011, and a joint venture that manages the u.k. 2019s atomic weapons establishment program. space systems 2019 operating results included the following (in millions):.
- | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net sales | $8347 | $8161 | $8268
operating profit | 1083 | 1063 | 1030
operating margins | 13.0% (13.0%) | 13.0% (13.0%) | 12.5% (12.5%)
backlog at year-end | 18100 | 16000 | 17800
2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $186 million, or 2% (2%), compared to 2011. the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries (two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011); about $125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements; and approximately $70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs. partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $105 million from certain government satellite programs (primarily sbirs and muos) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements; and about $55 million from the nasa external tank program, which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011..
what was the increase in the operating profit for space systems from 2011 to 2012? 20.0
and what was that operating profit in 2011? 1063.0
what, then, is that increase as a portion of this 2011 amount? 0.01881
and concerning this year and the previous, 2010, how much did the decrease in the net sales over the period represent in relation to the one in mst 2019s operating profit? | 4.57353 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | credit facility, which was amended in 2013 and 2012. in march 2014, the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019. the amount of the aggregate commitment is $3.990 billion (the 201c2014 credit facility 201d). the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $1.0 billion of borrowing capacity, subject to lender credit approval, increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4.990 billion. interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread. the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio (ratio of net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash) of 3 to 1, which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31, 2014. the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity, funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities. at december 31, 2014, the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility. commercial paper program. on october 14, 2009, blackrock established a commercial paper program (the 201ccp program 201d) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the 201ccp notes 201d) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $3.0 billion. blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $3.5 billion in 2011 and to $3.785 billion in 2012. in april 2013, blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $3.990 billion. the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility. at december 31, 2014, blackrock had no cp notes outstanding. long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31, 2014 included the following: (in millions) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value.
(in millions) | maturity amount | unamortized discount | carrying value | fair value
1.375% (1.375%) notes due 2015 | $750 | $2014 | $750 | $753
6.25% (6.25%) notes due 2017 | 700 | -1 (1) | 699 | 785
5.00% (5.00%) notes due 2019 | 1000 | -2 (2) | 998 | 1134
4.25% (4.25%) notes due 2021 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 825
3.375% (3.375%) notes due 2022 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 783
3.50% (3.50%) notes due 2024 | 1000 | -3 (3) | 997 | 1029
total long-term borrowings | $4950 | $-12 (12) | $4938 | $5309
long-term borrowings at december 31, 2013 had a carrying value of $4.939 billion and a fair value of $5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013. 2024 notes. in march 2014, the company issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% (3.50%) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18, 2024 (the 201c2024 notes 201d). the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year, or approximately $35 million per year. the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $6 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes. at december 31, 2014, $6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2015 and 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes maturing in june 2015 (the 201c2015 notes 201d) and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $10 million and $25 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year, which commenced december 1, 2012. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes. at december 31, 2014, $4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes (201c2013 floating rate notes 201d), which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. (201cmerrill lynch 201d). interest.
what is the fair value of notes due in 2015 plus those due 2017? | 1538.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on december 29, 2007 and tracks it through december 29, 2012. comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems, inc., the nasdaq composite index, and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems, inc. nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index, including reinvestment of dividends. indexes calculated on month-end basis. copyright a9 2013 s&p, a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved..
- | 12/29/2007 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc. | 100.00 | 22.55 | 35.17 | 48.50 | 61.07 | 78.92
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 59.03 | 82.25 | 97.32 | 98.63 | 110.78
s&p 400 information technology | 100.00 | 54.60 | 82.76 | 108.11 | 95.48 | 109.88
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012? 78.92
what is the net change in value? | -21.08 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | net sales increased $29.9 million, or 6.3% (6.3%), due to higher sales volume driven primarily by continuing improvement in the u.s. home products market and the benefit from new product introductions and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases. operating income increased $12.6 million, or 20.4% (20.4%), due to higher net sales, the benefits from productivity improvements and leveraging sales on our existing fixed cost base. security net sales increased $12.8 million, or 2.2% (2.2%), due to higher sales volume and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases. these benefits were partially offset by the impact of our exiting of two product lines in our commercial distribution channel. operating income increased $5.8 million, or 8.7% (8.7%), primarily due to the higher net sales, the benefits from productivity improvements, lower restructuring and other charges (approximately $6 million) relating to the completion in 2016 of a manufacturing facility relocation, favorable foreign exchange and the related cost savings resulting from the facility relocation. corporate corporate expenses increased by $5.7 million mainly due to the impairment of a long lived asset and recognition of an actuarial gain versus an actuarial loss in 2016 and higher defined benefit plan income during 2017 compared to 2016. (in millions) 2017 2016.
(in millions) | 2017 | 2016
general and administrative expense | $-90.3 (90.3) | $-80.9 (80.9)
defined benefit plan income | 4.2 | 2.9
defined benefit plan recognition of actuarial gains (losses) | 0.5 | -1.9 (1.9)
total corporate expenses | $-85.6 (85.6) | $-79.9 (79.9)
in future periods the company may record, in the corporate segment, material expense or income associated with actuarial gains and losses arising from periodic remeasurement of our liabilities for defined benefit plans. at a minimum the company will remeasure its defined benefit plan liabilities in the fourth quarter of each year. remeasurements due to plan amendments and settlements may also occur in interim periods during the year. remeasurement of these liabilities attributable to updating our liability discount rates and expected return on assets may, in particular, result in material income or expense recognition. 2016 compared to 2015 total fortune brands net sales net sales increased $405.5 million, or 9% (9%). the increase was due to higher sales volume primarily from the continuing improvement in u.s. market conditions for home products, the benefit from the acquisitions in our cabinets and plumbing segments and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases and the effect of unfavorable foreign exchange. these benefits were partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange of approximately $27 million and higher sales rebates. cost of products sold cost of products sold increased $182.8 million, or 6% (6%), due to higher net sales, including the impact of the acquisitions in our cabinets and plumbing segments, partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvements..
what was the change in the defined benefit plan income from 2016 to 2017? 1.3
and what was that income in 2016? 2.9
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2016 defined benefit plan, in percentage? | 0.44828 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions, using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline. change in assumption (a) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense (in millions).
change in assumption (a) | estimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense (in millions)
.5% (.5%) decrease in discount rate | $23
.5% (.5%) decrease in expected long-term return on assets | $18
.5% (.5%) increase in compensation rate | $2
(a) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant. our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions. investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years. also, current law, including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006, sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan. we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012. we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results, including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees. recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report, pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement. one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions. commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate, close, and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing (dus) program. we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc. under these programs, we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement. at december 31, 2011 and december 31, 2010, the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $13.0 billion and $13.2 billion, respectively. the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $4.0 billion at both december 31, 2011 and december 31, 2010. we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure. the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $47 million and $54 million as of december 31, 2011 and december 31, 2010, respectively, and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. if payment is required under these programs, we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred, although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses. our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment. residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis, we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors. these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements. residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations, non-agency securitizations, and whole-loan sale transactions. as discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report, agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma, fhlmc, and the government national mortgage association (gnma) program, while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors. our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc, as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency (fha) and department of veterans affairs (va) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal. repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment. pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition. pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business, and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions. repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment. loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group, inc. 2013 form 10-k 69.
what was the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs in 2011, in billions? | 13.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls, crude oil and natural gas at december 31, 2008, excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions. oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil. oneok partners estimates the following: 2022 a $0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $1.2 million; 2022 a $1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $1.0 million; and 2022 a $0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $0.6 million. the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by, or arise in conjunction with, price changes. for example, a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream, impacting gathering and processing margins, ngl exchange revenues, natural gas deliveries, and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated. oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage, the relative values of the various ngl products to each other, the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location, known as basis risk. oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations. oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities. in addition, oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided. when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers, the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas, or store or use natural gas from inventory, which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk. at december 31, 2008, there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business. distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas. gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in, and recoverable through, the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism. energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk, basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage, requirement contracts, asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations. we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments, which, under certain circumstances, are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges. we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas, which we hedge with derivative instruments. both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value. fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities, excluding $21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges..
- | (thousands of dollars)
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007 | $25171
derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period | -55874 (55874)
fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period | 236772
other changes in fair value | 52731
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 (a) | $258800
(a) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h, which is consistent with our business s trategy. the maturities are as fol lows: $225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009, $33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $(0.1) mil lion matures through march 2014. fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es.
what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008? | 233629.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) at december 31, 2005, the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $2.2 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. if not utilized, the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows (in thousands):.
years ended december 31, | federal | state
2006 to 2010 | $5248 | $469747
2011 to 2015 | 10012 | 272662
2016 to 2020 | 397691 | 777707
2021 to 2025 | 1744552 | 897896
total | $2157503 | $2418012
sfas no. 109, 201caccounting for income taxes, 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. 201d at december 31, 2005, the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $422.4 million, including approximately $249.5 million attributable to spectrasite, primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards. approximately $237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date. the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets. the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets, primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards, as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period. the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses. in june 2003 and october 2003, the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003, of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $90.0 million. based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities, the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006. there can be no assurances, however, with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund. the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state (no growth) projections based on its current operations. the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense. accordingly, the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations, material asset sales or other non-routine transactions. based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period, management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized. the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31, 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1, 2006 to december 31, 2025. if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future, or carry back losses, as described above, it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense, which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity. from time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations. the company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations. during the year ended.
what was the total value of net operating loss carryforwards? 4575515.0
and how much do the net operating loss carryforwards related to state represent in relation to this total? | 0.52847 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities. treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives. for further information on derivatives, refer to note 5. in addition, treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments. for further information on liquidity and funding risk, refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100. for information on interest rate, foreign exchange and other risks, refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131. the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, u.s. and non-u.s. government securities, obligations of u.s. states and municipalities, other abs and corporate debt securities. at december 31, 2018, the investment securities portfolio was $260.1 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s). refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31, (in millions) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ (losses) $(395) $(78) $132 available-for-sale (201cafs 201d) investment securities (average) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity (201chtm 201d) investment securities (average) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio (average) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities (period-end) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities (period-end) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio (period 2013end) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance, the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018. for additional information, refer to notes 1 and 10..
as of or for the year ended december 31 (in millions) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
investment securities gains/ (losses) | $-395 (395) | $-78 (78) | $132
available-for-sale (201cafs 201d) investment securities (average) | 203449 | 219345 | 226892
held-to-maturity (201chtm 201d) investment securities (average) | 31747 | 47927 | 51358
investment securities portfolio (average) | 235197 | 267272 | 278250
afs investment securities (period-end) | 228681 | 200247 | 236670
htm investment securities (period-end) | 31434 | 47733 | 50168
investment securities portfolio (period 2013end) | 260115 | 247980 | 286838
management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities. treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives. for further information on derivatives, refer to note 5. in addition, treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments. for further information on liquidity and funding risk, refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100. for information on interest rate, foreign exchange and other risks, refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131. the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, u.s. and non-u.s. government securities, obligations of u.s. states and municipalities, other abs and corporate debt securities. at december 31, 2018, the investment securities portfolio was $260.1 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s). refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31, (in millions) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ (losses) $(395) $(78) $132 available-for-sale (201cafs 201d) investment securities (average) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity (201chtm 201d) investment securities (average) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio (average) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities (period-end) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities (period-end) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio (period 2013end) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance, the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018. for additional information, refer to notes 1 and 10..
what is the value of the afs investment securities in 2018? 228681.0
what is the value in 2017? 200247.0
what is the sum? | 428928.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the goldman sachs group, inc. and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above: 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting, and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure. 2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels. where the counterparty netting is across levels, the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting. 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts. significant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets (liabilities), and ranges, averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives. level 3 assets (liabilities) and range of significant unobservable inputs (average/median) as of december $in millions 2017 2016.
$in millions | level 3 assets (liabilities) and range of significant unobservable inputs (average/median) as of december 2017 | level 3 assets (liabilities) and range of significant unobservable inputs (average/median) as of december 2016
interest rates net | $-410 (410) | $-381 (381)
correlation | (10)% (%) to 95% (95%) (71%/79% (71%/79%)) | (10)% (%) to 86% (86%) (56%/60% (56%/60%))
volatility (bps) | 31 to 150 (84/78) | 31 to 151 (84/57)
credit net | $1505 | $2504
correlation | 28% (28%) to 84% (84%) (61%/60% (61%/60%)) | 35% (35%) to 91% (91%) (65%/68% (65%/68%))
credit spreads (bps) | 1 to 633 (69/42) | 1 to 993 (122/73)
upfront credit points | 0 to 97 (42/38) | 0 to 100 (43/35)
recovery rates | 22% (22%) to 73% (73%) (68%/73% (68%/73%)) | 1% (1%) to 97% (97%) (58%/70% (58%/70%))
currencies net | $-181 (181) | $3
correlation | 49% (49%) to 72% (72%) (61%/62% (61%/62%)) | 25% (25%) to 70% (70%) (50%/55% (50%/55%))
commodities net | $47 | $73
volatility | 9% (9%) to 79% (79%) (24%/24% (24%/24%)) | 13% (13%) to 68% (68%) (33%/33% (33%/33%))
natural gas spread | $(2.38) to $3.34 ($(0.22) /$(0.12)) | $(1.81) to $4.33 ($(0.14) /$(0.05))
oil spread | $(2.86) to $23.61 ($6.47/$2.35) | $(19.72) to $64.92 ($25.30/$16.43)
equities net | $-1249 (1249) | $-3416 (3416)
correlation | (36)% (%) to 94% (94%) (50%/52% (50%/52%)) | (39)% (%) to 88% (88%) (41%/41% (41%/41%))
volatility | 4% (4%) to 72% (72%) (24%/22% (24%/22%)) | 5% (5%) to 72% (72%) (24%/23% (24%/23%))
in the table above: 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts. 2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative. 2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments. an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average. for example, the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range. 2030 the ranges, averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative. for example, the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative. accordingly, the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in, or possible ranges of, fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives. 2030 interest rates, currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models, credit derivatives are valued using option pricing, correlation and discounted cash flow models, and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models. 2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques. for example, option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value. therefore, the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques. 2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation. 2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas. 2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products. range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments: 2030 correlation. ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type (e.g., equity index and equity single stock names) and across product types (e.g., correlation of an interest rate and a currency), as well as across regions. generally, cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type. 2030 volatility. ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets, maturities and strike prices. for example, volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks. 2030 credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates. the ranges for credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers (index and single names), regions, sectors, maturities and credit qualities (high-yield and investment-grade). the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs. 130 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k.
between 2016 and 2017, what was the variation in the credit net? | -999.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | page 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities, rental payments under noncancellable operating leases, purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31, 2007, are summarized in the following table:.
($in millions) | payments due by period (a) total | payments due by period (a) less than 1 year | payments due by period (a) 1-3 years | payments due by period (a) 3-5 years | payments due by period (a) more than 5 years
long-term debt | $2302.6 | $126.1 | $547.6 | $1174.9 | $454.0
capital lease obligations | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.1
interest payments on long-term debt (b) | 698.6 | 142.9 | 246.3 | 152.5 | 156.9
operating leases | 218.5 | 49.9 | 71.7 | 42.5 | 54.4
purchase obligations (c) | 6092.6 | 2397.2 | 3118.8 | 576.6 | 2013
common stock repurchase agreements | 131.0 | 131.0 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013
legal settlement | 70.0 | 70.0 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013
total payments on contractual obligations | $9517.7 | $2918.1 | $3985.2 | $1947.0 | $667.4
total payments on contractual obligations $9517.7 $2918.1 $3985.2 $1947.0 $667.4 (a) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates. (b) for variable rate facilities, amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments. (c) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum, steel, plastic resin and other direct materials. also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity, aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items. in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved, management 2019s best estimates have been used. depending on the circumstances, early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and, therefore, actual payments could vary significantly. contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans, not including the unfunded german plans, are expected to be $49 million in 2008. this estimate may change based on plan asset performance. benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $66 million, $70 million, $74 million, $77 million and $82 million for the years ending december 31, 2008 through 2012, respectively, and a total of $473 million for the years 2013 through 2017. payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $136 million for the years 2013 through 2017. in accordance with united kingdom pension regulations, ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom. if the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels, ball will be required to either: (1) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan; (2) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or (3) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency, provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan. the guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees. our share repurchase program in 2007 was $211.3 million, net of issuances, compared to $45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $358.1 million in 2005. the net repurchases included the $51.9 million settlement on january 5, 2007, of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares. however, the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares. the contract was settled on january 7, 2008, for $31 million in cash. on december 12, 2007, in a privately negotiated transaction, ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings. the company advanced the $100 million on january 7, 2008, and received approximately 2 million shares, which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price. the exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement, which will be determined on the settlement date (no later than june 5, 2008), is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date. the company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares. including the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement, we expect to repurchase approximately $300 million of our common shares, net of issuances, in 2008. annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007, 2006 and 2005. total dividends paid were $40.6 million in 2007, $41 million in 2006 and $42.5 million in 2005..
what were the annual cash dividends paid on common stock per share in 2006, in dollars? 0.4
and what was, in millions, the total of dividends paid in that year? 41.0
how many shares, then, in millions, were bought in 2006, considering those two values? | 102.5 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process. integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices. purchase price. the company paid $11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl. in addition, the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $1.9 million. the total purchase consideration consisted of:.
- | (in thousands)
cash paid | $11001
prior investment in hpl | 1872
acquisition-related costs | 2831
total purchase price | $15704
acquisition-related costs of $2.8 million consist primarily of legal, tax and accounting fees of $1.6 million, $0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges, and $0.9 million in employee termination costs. as of october 31, 2006, the company had paid $2.2 million of the acquisition related costs, of which $1.1 million were for professional services costs, $0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $0.9 million were for employee termination costs. the $0.6 million balance remaining at october 31, 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs. assets acquired. the company acquired $8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $5.1 million in core developed technology, $3.2 million in customer relationships and $0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years. approximately $0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. accordingly, the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. additionally, the company acquired tangible assets of $14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $10.9 million. goodwill, representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $3.4 million. goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations. other. during the fiscal year 2006, the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $1.5 million. this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations. fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation (nassda) the company acquired nassda on may 11, 2005. reasons for the acquisition. the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools, particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design. purchase price. the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $200.2 million, or $7.00 per share. in addition, as required by the merger agreement, certain nassda officers, directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation.
what is the total acquired intangible assets in thousands? 8500.0
what is the total purchase price in thousands? 15704.0
what portion of the total purchase price is for intangible assets? | 0.54126 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 14. capital stock shares outstanding. the following table presents information regarding capital stock:.
(in thousands) | december 31, 2017 | december 31, 2016
class a common stock authorized | 1000000 | 1000000
class a common stock issued and outstanding | 339235 | 338240
class b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding | 0.6 | 0.6
class b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding | 0.8 | 0.8
class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding | 1.3 | 1.3
class b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding | 0.4 | 0.4
cme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. associated trading rights. members of cme, cbot, nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading, discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents. each class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme. a cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group. the class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below. trading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot, at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships. members of cbot, nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits. core rights. holders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares. these core rights relate primarily to trading right protections, certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections. votes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class. each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights: class b-1, six votes per share; class b-2, two votes per share; class b-3, one vote per share; and class b-4, 1/6th of one vote per share. the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights. holders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights. voting rights. with the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock, holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required. in these votes, each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share. transfer restrictions. each class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group. these transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights. election of directors. the cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members. holders of class b-1, class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors, of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders, two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders. the remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class..
between the years of 2016 and 2017, what was the change in the number of class a common stocks issued and outstanding? | 995.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities. treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives. for further information on derivatives, refer to note 5. in addition, treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments. for further information on liquidity and funding risk, refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100. for information on interest rate, foreign exchange and other risks, refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131. the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, u.s. and non-u.s. government securities, obligations of u.s. states and municipalities, other abs and corporate debt securities. at december 31, 2018, the investment securities portfolio was $260.1 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s). refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31, (in millions) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ (losses) $(395) $(78) $132 available-for-sale (201cafs 201d) investment securities (average) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity (201chtm 201d) investment securities (average) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio (average) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities (period-end) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities (period-end) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio (period 2013end) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance, the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018. for additional information, refer to notes 1 and 10..
as of or for the year ended december 31 (in millions) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
investment securities gains/ (losses) | $-395 (395) | $-78 (78) | $132
available-for-sale (201cafs 201d) investment securities (average) | 203449 | 219345 | 226892
held-to-maturity (201chtm 201d) investment securities (average) | 31747 | 47927 | 51358
investment securities portfolio (average) | 235197 | 267272 | 278250
afs investment securities (period-end) | 228681 | 200247 | 236670
htm investment securities (period-end) | 31434 | 47733 | 50168
investment securities portfolio (period 2013end) | 260115 | 247980 | 286838
management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities. treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives. for further information on derivatives, refer to note 5. in addition, treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments. for further information on liquidity and funding risk, refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100. for information on interest rate, foreign exchange and other risks, refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131. the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, u.s. and non-u.s. government securities, obligations of u.s. states and municipalities, other abs and corporate debt securities. at december 31, 2018, the investment securities portfolio was $260.1 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s). refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio. selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31, (in millions) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ (losses) $(395) $(78) $132 available-for-sale (201cafs 201d) investment securities (average) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity (201chtm 201d) investment securities (average) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio (average) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities (period-end) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities (period-end) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio (period 2013end) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance, the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018. for additional information, refer to notes 1 and 10..
what was the amount of the afs investment securities in 2018? 228681.0
and what was it in 2017? 200247.0
what was, then, the combined total for the two years? 428928.0
including 2016, what then becomes this total? 665598.0
and what was the average between the three years? | 221866.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts, and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts. in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm, we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation. these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions, performance bonds and any other available assets, such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights. in addition, we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm. thereafter, if the payment default remains unsatisfied, we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package. we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit. we maintain a $5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing. we have the option to request an increase in the line from $5.0 billion to $7.0 billion. we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default, in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary (custodian of the collateral), or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms. the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit. pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s. treasury or agency securities, as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility (ief) programs. performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line. in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit, we also have the option to use our $1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default. aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $86.8 billion, including $5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $4.2 billion of letters of credit. a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm. the following shows the available assets at december 31, 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets: (in millions) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options (1)........ $100.0 guaranty fund contributions (2)..... 2899.5 assessment powers (3)............ 7973.6 minimum total assets available for default (4).................... $10973.1 (1) cme clearing designates $100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit. (2) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms, but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms. (3) in the event of a clearing firm default, if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm, our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions, we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund. (4) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral..
(in millions) | cme clearingavailable assets
designated corporate contributions for futures and options (1) | $100.0
guaranty fund contributions (2) | 2899.5
assessment powers (3) | 7973.6
minimum total assets available for default (4) | $10973.1
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts, and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts. in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm, we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation. these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions, performance bonds and any other available assets, such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights. in addition, we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm. thereafter, if the payment default remains unsatisfied, we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package. we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit. we maintain a $5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing. we have the option to request an increase in the line from $5.0 billion to $7.0 billion. we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default, in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary (custodian of the collateral), or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms. the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit. pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s. treasury or agency securities, as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility (ief) programs. performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line. in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit, we also have the option to use our $1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default. aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $86.8 billion, including $5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $4.2 billion of letters of credit. a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm. the following shows the available assets at december 31, 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets: (in millions) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options (1)........ $100.0 guaranty fund contributions (2)..... 2899.5 assessment powers (3)............ 7973.6 minimum total assets available for default (4).................... $10973.1 (1) cme clearing designates $100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit. (2) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms, but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms. (3) in the event of a clearing firm default, if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm, our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions, we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund. (4) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral..
what is the maximum potential change that can be made by cme on their current line of credit? | 2.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows:.
type of customer | 2019 | 2018 | 2017
restaurants | 62% (62%) | 62% (62%) | 61% (61%)
education government | 9 | 8 | 9
travel leisure retail | 9 | 8 | 9
healthcare | 8 | 9 | 9
other (1) | 12 | 13 | 12
totals | 100% (100%) | 100% (100%) | 100% (100%)
(1) other includes cafeterias that are not stand-alone restaurants, bakeries, caterers, churches, civic and fraternal organizations, vending distributors, other distributors and international exports. none of these types of customers, as a group, exceeded 5% (5%) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented. sources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers, both domestic and international, none of which individually accounts for more than 10% (10%) of our purchases. these suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise, as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers. we also provide specialty and seasonal products from small to mid-sized producers to meet a growing demand for locally sourced products. our locally sourced products, including produce, meats, cheese and other products, help differentiate our customers 2019 offerings, satisfy demands for new products, and support local communities. purchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs, domestically and internationally, and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies. we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop, obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products. the program covers the purchasing and marketing of branded merchandise, as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers, encompassing substantially all product lines. some of our products are purchased internationally within global procurement centers in order to build strategic relationships with international suppliers and to optimize our supply chain network. sysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers, although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs. we also focus on increasing profitability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels, which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies, while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers. working capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash flow from operations, commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings. see the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity, financial position and sources and uses of funds. we extend credit terms to our customers that can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness. we monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary. a majority of our sales orders are filled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed. we generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand. the level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life, supplier order fulfillment lead times and customer demand. we also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities. we take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 45 days or more. corporate headquarters and shared services center our corporate staff makes available a number of services to our operating companies and our shared services center performs support services for employees, suppliers and customers. members of these groups possess experience and expertise in, among other areas, customer and vendor contract administration, accounting and finance, treasury, legal, information technology, payroll and employee benefits, risk management and insurance, sales and marketing, merchandising, inbound logistics, human resources, strategy and tax compliance services. the corporate office also makes available supply chain expertise, such as in warehousing and distribution services, which provide assistance in operational best practices, including space utilization, energy conservation, fleet management and work flow..
what was the percentage of sales to restaurants in 2018? 0.62
what was it in the previous year, 2017? 0.61
by what amount, then, did that percentage increase over the year? | 0.01 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | reinsurance commissions, fees and other revenue decreased 2% (2%) in 2014 reflecting a 1% (1%) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% (1%) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty, partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business, as well as facultative placements. operating income operating income increased $108 million, or 7% (7%), from 2013 to $1.6 billion in 2014. in 2014, operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% (21.0%), an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% (19.8%) in 2013. operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth, return on investments, expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs, partially offset by a $61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates. hr solutions.
years ended december 31 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
revenue | $4264 | $4057 | $3925
operating income | 485 | 318 | 289
operating margin | 11.4% (11.4%) | 7.8% (7.8%) | 7.4% (7.4%)
our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% (35%) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services, as follows: 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services, defined contribution consulting, tax and erisa consulting, and pension administration. 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including: compensation planning design, executive reward strategies, salary survey and benchmarking, market share studies and sales force effectiveness, with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries. 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent, change and organizational effectiveness issues, including talent strategy and acquisition, executive on-boarding, performance management, leadership assessment and development, communication strategy, workforce training and change management. 2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies, other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types, including defined benefit plans, defined contribution plans, endowments and foundations. 2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit (pension), defined contribution (401 (k)), and health and welfare administrative services. our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient, effective, and less costly solutions. 2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare, while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs. 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data; administer benefits, payroll and other human resources processes; and record and manage talent, workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending, dependent audit and participant advocacy. disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace. weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate. while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time, these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services, which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations..
what was the operating margin in 2014? | 0.114 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | results of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012% (%) change 2014 v 2013% (%) change 2013 v 2012.
millions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |% (%) change 2014 v 2013 |% (%) change 2013 v 2012
freight revenues | $22560 | $20684 | $19686 | 9% (9%) | 5% (5%)
other revenues | 1428 | 1279 | 1240 | 12% (12%) | 3% (3%)
total | $23988 | $21963 | $20926 | 9% (9%) | 5% (5%)
we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups. freight revenues vary with volume (carloads) and average revenue per car (arc). changes in price, traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc. we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations, which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments. we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination. we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them. other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries, revenues from our commuter rail operations, and accessorial revenues, which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage. we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations. freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% (7%) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% (2.5%). volume growth from grain, frac sand, rock, and intermodal (domestic and international) shipments offset declines in crude oil. freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012. revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012. arc increased 5% (5%), driven by core pricing gains, shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement. volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive, frac sand, crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal, international intermodal and grain shipments. our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $2.8 billion, $2.6 billion, and $2.6 billion in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% (6%) driven by our 7% (7%) carloadings increase. fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs (surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months). in 2014, other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries, primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services, accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage (previously included in automotive freight revenue). in 2013, other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services..
what was the fuel surcharge program freight revenue in 2014? 2.8
and in 2013? | 2.6 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on december 29, 2007 and tracks it through december 29, 2012. comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems, inc., the nasdaq composite index, and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems, inc. nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index, including reinvestment of dividends. indexes calculated on month-end basis. copyright a9 2013 s&p, a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc. all rights reserved..
- | 12/29/2007 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc. | 100.00 | 22.55 | 35.17 | 48.50 | 61.07 | 78.92
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 59.03 | 82.25 | 97.32 | 98.63 | 110.78
s&p 400 information technology | 100.00 | 54.60 | 82.76 | 108.11 | 95.48 | 109.88
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
what is the net change in the price of the nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012? | 10.78 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands): years ending december 31:.
2011 | $62465
2012 | 54236
2013 | 47860
2014 | 37660
2015 | 28622
thereafter | 79800
future minimum lease payments | $310643
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $66.9 million, $57.2 million and $49.0 million during the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses, we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses, some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions, for the lease of certain properties used in our operations. typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years, with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods. we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property. lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $1.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases. the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost. in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold, we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall. similarly, if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold, we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value. had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31, 2010, the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $31.4 million. we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value. litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008, ford global technologies, llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s. infringed on ford design patents. the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011. pursuant to the settlement, we (and our designees) became the sole distributor in the u.s. of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s. design patent. we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell. the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation, claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business. we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows..
what is the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2009 to 2010? 9.7
what percentage change does this represent? | 0.16958 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc. information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets, as well as pricing guides and other sources. the current market for the aircraft, the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets, among other factors, were considered. the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available. the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets, including customer relationships, marketing agreements, certain international route authorities, and the us airways tradename. the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset. projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money. the cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility, was used, as appropriate, for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset. the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset, less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation. the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9, 2013. the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service, domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel. pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1, 2012. the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets, lease and debt fair value adjustments, the elimination of any deferred gains or losses, adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense, among others. in addition, the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger, as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items, net and merger transition costs. however, the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger. accordingly, the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1, 2012. december 31, (in millions).
- | december 31 2013 (in millions)
revenue | $40678
net income | 2526
5. basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies (a) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9, 2013 to december 31, 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. for the periods prior to december 9, 2013, the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group. all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states (gaap) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. actual results could differ from those estimates. the most significant areas.
what was revenue in 2013? 40678.0
what was net income? 2526.0
what is revenue less net income? 38152.0
what was 2013 revenue? | 40678.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange (201cnyse 201d) for the years 2008 and 2007..
2008 | high | low
quarter ended march 31 | $42.72 | $32.10
quarter ended june 30 | 46.10 | 38.53
quarter ended september 30 | 43.43 | 31.89
quarter ended december 31 | 37.28 | 19.35
2007 | high | low
quarter ended march 31 | $41.31 | $36.63
quarter ended june 30 | 43.84 | 37.64
quarter ended september 30 | 45.45 | 36.34
quarter ended december 31 | 46.53 | 40.08
on february 13, 2009, the closing price of our common stock was $28.85 per share as reported on the nyse. as of february 13, 2009, we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders. dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock. we anticipate that we may retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. the indentures governing our 7.50% (7.50%) senior notes due 2012 (201c7.50% (201c7.50%) notes 201d) and our 7.125% (7.125%) senior notes due 2012 (201c7.125% (201c7.125%) notes 201d) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants. the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan, and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% (7.50%) notes and 7.125% (7.125%) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied. in addition, while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% (7.50%) notes and 7.125% (7.125%) notes, certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction. for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan, our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction, see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report..
what was the highest price of the company's share price for the quarter ended march 31, 2008? 42.72
what was the lowest price? | 32.1 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements (a) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds, some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds. (b) these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). (c) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982, entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service. the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7, 1983. entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee, plus accrued interest, in long-term (d) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations. (e) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $149 million at entergy louisiana and $97 million at system energy, long-term doe obligations of $181 million at entergy arkansas, and the note payable to nypa of $95 million at entergy, and includes debt due within one year. fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations) for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2013, for the next five years are as follows: amount (in thousands).
- | amount (in thousands)
2014 | $385373
2015 | $1110566
2016 | $270852
2017 | $766801
2018 | $1324616
in november 2000, entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001. in july 2003 a payment of $102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa. under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes, if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness, entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit. entergy gulf states louisiana, entergy louisiana, entergy mississippi, entergy texas, and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015. entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015. entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014. capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors, entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% (35%) of its total capitalization (excluding short- term debt);.
what is the amount of long-term debt due in 2014? 385373.0
what is the amount due in 2015? 1110566.0
what is the sum? | 1495939.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | part ii. item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns. as of february 2, 2019, we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock. stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index, the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28, 2013 (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29, 2018 and, for each index, on the last day of the calendar year. comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems, inc., the nasdaq composite index, the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. fiscal year ending december 29. copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s, a division of s&p global. all rights reserved. nasdaq compositecadence design systems, inc. s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology.
- | 12/28/2013 | 1/3/2015 | 1/2/2016 | 12/31/2016 | 12/30/2017 | 12/29/2018
cadence design systems inc. | $100.00 | $135.18 | $149.39 | $181.05 | $300.22 | $311.13
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 112.60 | 113.64 | 133.19 | 172.11 | 165.84
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 110.28 | 109.54 | 129.05 | 157.22 | 150.33
s&p 500 information technology | 100.00 | 115.49 | 121.08 | 144.85 | 201.10 | 200.52
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance..
what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100? | 211.13 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the analysis of our depreciation studies. changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively. under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using (i) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies. the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. in addition, we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies. any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets. for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies. a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations. when we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. however, many of our assets are self-constructed. a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties, which is typically performed by our employees, and for track line expansion and other capacity projects. costs that are directly attributable to capital projects (including overhead costs) are capitalized. direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset. general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.4 billion for 2014, $2.3 billion for 2013, and $2.1 billion for 2012. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 13. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions 2014 2013.
millions | dec. 31 2014 | dec. 312013
accounts payable | $877 | $803
dividends payable | 438 | 356
income and other taxes payable | 412 | 491
accrued wages and vacation | 409 | 385
accrued casualty costs | 249 | 207
interest payable | 178 | 169
equipment rents payable | 100 | 96
other | 640 | 579
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities | $3303 | $3086
.
what is the balance of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2014? 3303.0
what about in 2013? 3086.0
what is the net change? 217.0
what about percentage change? | 0.07032 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements (a) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds, some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds. (b) these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). (c) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982, entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service. the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7, 1983. entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee, plus accrued interest, in long-term debt. (d) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations. (e) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $109 million at entergy louisiana and $34 million at system energy, long-term doe obligations of $181 million at entergy arkansas, and the note payable to nypa of $35 million at entergy, and includes debt due within one year. fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations) for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2015, for the next five years are as follows: amount (in thousands).
- | amount (in thousands)
2016 | $204079
2017 | $766451
2018 | $822690
2019 | $768588
2020 | $1631181
in november 2000, entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001. as part of the purchase agreement with nypa, entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date. with the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle, entergy reduced this liability by $26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes, if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness, entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit. entergy louisiana, entergy mississippi, entergy texas, and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017. entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018. entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016. capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors, entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to:.
what was the amount of long-term debt maturities in 2018? 822690.0
and in 2019? 768588.0
so what was the difference between these two years? | 54102.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | table of contents adobe inc. notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes. the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized. we provide u.s. income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system. to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated, the related u.s. tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings. as of november 30, 2018, the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s. income taxes have not been provided is approximately $275 million. the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $57.8 million. as of november 30, 2018, we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $881.1 million for federal and $349.7 million for state. we also have federal, state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $8.8 million, $189.9 million and $14.9 million, respectively. the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036. the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely. the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382, the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized. as of november 30, 2018, a valuation allowance of $174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets. for fiscal 2018, the total change in the valuation allowance was $80.9 million. accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017, our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows (in thousands):.
- | 2018 | 2017
beginning balance | $172945 | $178413
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions | 16191 | 3680
gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions | -4000 (4000) | -30166 (30166)
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions | 60721 | 24927
settlements with taxing authorities | 2014 | -3876 (3876)
lapse of statute of limitations | -45922 (45922) | -8819 (8819)
foreign exchange gains and losses | -3783 (3783) | 8786
ending balance | $196152 | $172945
the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $24.6 million and $23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years. we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s. state and foreign jurisdictions. we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities. our major tax jurisdictions are ireland, california and the united states. for ireland, california and the united states, the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008, 2014 and 2015, respectively. we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations. we believe such estimates to be reasonable; however, there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position. the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process. these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets, liabilities and income taxes payable. we believe that within the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire, or both. given the uncertainties described above, we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $0 to approximately $45 million..
between the years of 2017 and 2018, what was the variation observed in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits? | 23207.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year, or approximately $35 million per year. the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes. 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes, which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity, and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year. the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes. 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes, which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. interest on the 4.25% (4.25%) notes due in 2021 (201c2021 notes 201d) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year, and is approximately $32 million per year. the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes. 2019 notes. in december 2009, the company issued $2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $0.5 billion of 2.25% (2.25%) notes, which were repaid in december 2012, $1.0 billion of 3.50% (3.50%) notes, which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity, and $1.0 billion of 5.0% (5.0%) notes maturing in december 2019 (the 201c2019 notes 201d). net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program, which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1, 2009, and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year. these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes. 13. commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043. future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows: (in millions).
year | amount
2018 | 141
2019 | 132
2020 | 126
2021 | 118
2022 | 109
thereafter | 1580
total | $2206
in may 2017, the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc, for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards, new york, new york. the term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin, expected to occur in may 2023, with the option to renew for a specified term. the lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term, increasing every five years to $58 million, $66 million and $74 million per year (or approximately $1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term). this lease is classified as an operating lease and, as such, is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition. rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $132 million, $134 million and $136 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. investment commitments. at december 31, 2017, the company had $298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds, including consolidated vies. these funds include private equity funds, real assets funds, and opportunistic funds. this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds. generally, the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment. these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding. the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for, and with, its clients. contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions. in connection with certain acquisitions, blackrock is required to make contingent payments, subject to achieving specified performance targets, which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products. the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31, 2017 totaled $236 million, including $128 million related to the first reserve transaction, and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition..
what was the difference in rent payment after 10 years compared to after five years? 8.0
and the specific rent value after five years? | 58.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 28 2014 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30, 2014, of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s & p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company: comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates, inc., the s&p 500 index, and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values:.
- | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014
jkhy | 100.00 | 116.85 | 148.92 | 173.67 | 240.25 | 307.57
old peer group | 100.00 | 112.45 | 150.77 | 176.12 | 220.42 | 275.73
new peer group | 100.00 | 115.50 | 159.31 | 171.86 | 198.72 | 273.95
s & p 500 | 100.00 | 114.43 | 149.55 | 157.70 | 190.18 | 236.98
this comparison assumes $100 was invested on june 30, 2009, and assumes reinvestments of dividends. total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period. peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software, hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses. in fiscal 2014, we changed our peer group of companies used for this analysis to maintain alignment with peer companies selected by our compensation committee for use in determining compensation for executive management. companies in the new peer group are aci worldwide, inc., bottomline technology, inc., broadridge financial solutions, cardtronics, inc., convergys corp., corelogic, inc., dst systems, inc., euronet worldwide, inc., fair isaac corp., fidelity national information services, inc., fiserv, inc., global payments, inc., heartland payment systems, inc., micros systems, inc., moneygram international, inc., ss&c technologies holdings, inc., total systems services, inc., tyler technologies, inc., verifone systems, inc., and wex, inc.. companies in the old peer group are aci worldwide, inc., bottomline technology, inc., cerner corp., dst systems, inc., euronet worldwide, inc., fair isaac corp., fidelity national information services, inc., fiserv, inc., sei investments company, telecommunications systems, inc., and tyler technologies corp..
what was the annual performance of the jkhy stock in 2010? 116.85
and what was it in 2009? | 100.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | when we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. however, many of our assets are self-constructed. a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion (capacity projects) and replacement (program projects), which is typically performed by our employees. approximately 13% (13%) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets. costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized. direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset. these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no. 67, accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects. general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 10. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions of dollars 2008 2007.
millions of dollars | dec. 31 2008 | dec. 31 2007
accounts payable | $629 | $732
accrued wages and vacation | 367 | 394
accrued casualty costs | 390 | 371
income and other taxes | 207 | 343
dividends and interest | 328 | 284
equipment rents payable | 93 | 103
other | 546 | 675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities | $2560 | $2902
11. fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008, we fully adopted fasb statement no. 157, fair value measurements (fas 157). fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations. fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis. this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories: level 1: quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. level 2: observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. level 3: unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data..
what was the equipment rents payable in 2008? | 93.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15, 2008. we will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no. 141 (r) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter. in december 2007, the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no. 160, noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no. 51. a noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. statement no. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. under statement no. 160, noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity. additionally, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement. statement no. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. we do not expect the adoption of statement no. 160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures. 2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends, the information that was used to prepare the december 31, 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties. these forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand, curtailment, producibility and general market conditions for our oil, natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007, unless otherwise noted. we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report. amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s. dollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $0.98 u.s. dollar to $1.00 canadian dollar. in january 2007, we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa, including equatorial guinea, cote d 2019ivoire, gabon and other countries in the region. in november 2007, we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $205.5 million. we are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package. we are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008. all west african related revenues, expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements. accordingly, all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa, unless otherwise noted. though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years, these transactions are opportunity driven. thus, the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008, except for west africa as previously discussed. oil, gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil, gas and ngl production for 2008. we estimate that our combined 2008 oil, gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe. of this total, approximately 92% (92%) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31, 2007. the following estimates for oil, gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production. oil gas ngls total (mmbbls) (bcf) (mmbbls) (mmboe).
- | oil (mmbbls) | gas (bcf) | ngls (mmbbls) | total (mmboe)
u.s. onshore | 12 | 626 | 23 | 140
u.s. offshore | 8 | 68 | 1 | 20
canada | 23 | 198 | 4 | 60
international | 23 | 2 | 2014 | 23
total | 66 | 894 | 28 | 243
.
what is the amount of oil and gas mmboe from canada divided by the total? | 0.24691 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | net revenues include $3.8 billion in 2017 and $739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps, mainly driven by japan. these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers. excluding excise taxes, net revenues for rrps were $3.6 billion in 2017 and $733 million in 2016. in some jurisdictions, including japan, we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes. in 2017, approximately $0.9 billion of our $3.6 billion in rrp net revenues, excluding excise taxes, were from iqos devices and accessories. excise taxes on products increased by $1.1 billion, due to: 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ($4.6 billion), partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ($1.9 billion) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ($1.6 billion). our cost of sales; marketing, administration and research costs; and operating income were as follows: for the years ended december 31, variance.
(in millions) | for the years ended december 31, 2017 | for the years ended december 31, 2016 | for the years ended december 31, $|% (%)
cost of sales | $10432 | $9391 | $1041 | 11.1% (11.1%)
marketing administration and research costs | 6725 | 6405 | 320 | 5.0% (5.0%)
operating income | 11503 | 10815 | 688 | 6.4% (6.4%)
cost of sales increased by $1.0 billion, due to: 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ($1.1 billion), partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ($36 million) and 2022 favorable currency ($30 million). marketing, administration and research costs increased by $320 million, due to: 2022 higher expenses ($570 million, largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products, predominately in the european union and asia), partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ($250 million). operating income increased by $688 million, due primarily to: 2022 price increases ($1.4 billion), partly offset by 2022 higher marketing, administration and research costs ($570 million) and 2022 unfavorable currency ($157 million). interest expense, net, of $914 million increased by $23 million, due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels, partly offset by higher interest income. our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% (40.7%). the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act. for further details, see item 8, note 11. income taxes to our consolidated financial statements. we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability. based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act, we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% (28%), subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction. we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world, and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions. it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close, which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties. an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time. net earnings attributable to pmi of $6.0 billion decreased by $932 million (13.4% (13.4%)). this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above, partly offset by higher operating income. diluted and basic eps of $3.88 decreased by 13.4% (13.4%). excluding.
what was, in millions, the operating income in 2017? 11503.0
and what was it in 2016? | 10815.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.2 billion for 2011, $2.0 billion for 2010, and $1.9 billion for 2009. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 12. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions 2011 2010.
millions | dec. 31 2011 | dec. 31 2010
accounts payable | $819 | $677
income and other taxes | 482 | 337
accrued wages and vacation | 363 | 357
dividends payable | 284 | 183
accrued casualty costs | 249 | 325
interest payable | 197 | 200
equipment rents payable | 90 | 86
other | 624 | 548
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities | $3108 | $2713
13. financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices. we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and, by policy, do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period. we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception, as well as our risk- management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions, and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings. we may use swaps, collars, futures, and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices; however, the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements. market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item. we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments, which is minimal, by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements. at december 31, 2011 and 2010, we were not required to provide collateral, nor had we received collateral, relating to our hedging activities. determination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows. interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period. we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings. we employ derivatives, primarily swaps, as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix. in addition, we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities. swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates. we account for swaps as fair value.
what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2011? 2200.0
and what were the accrued casualty costs during 2010? | 325.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (a) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds, certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds. (b) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1, 2005 and can then be remarketed. (c) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1, 2004 and can then be remarketed. (d) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1, 2003. entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders, pursuant to the mandatory tender provision, and has not remarketed the bonds at this time. entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds. (e) on june 1, 2002, entergy louisiana remarketed $55 million st. charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030, resetting the interest rate to 4.9% (4.9%) through may 2005. (f) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1, 2005 and can then be remarketed. (g) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982, entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service. the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7, 1983. entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee, plus accrued interest, in long-term (h) the fair value excludes lease obligations, long-term doe obligations, and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year. it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations) for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2003, for the next five years are as follows:.
- | (in thousands)
2004 | $503215
2005 | $462420
2006 | $75896
2007 | $624539
2008 | $941625
in november 2000, entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001, and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above. in july 2003, a payment of $102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa. under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes, if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness, entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit. covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% (65%) or less of its total capitalization. if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit, or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur..
what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005? 965635.0
what is the value for 2006? 75896.0
what is the total sum including all 3 years? 1041531.0
what is that divided by 1000? | 1041.531 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | credit facility, which was amended in 2013 and 2012. in march 2014, the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019. the amount of the aggregate commitment is $3.990 billion (the 201c2014 credit facility 201d). the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $1.0 billion of borrowing capacity, subject to lender credit approval, increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4.990 billion. interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread. the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio (ratio of net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash) of 3 to 1, which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31, 2014. the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity, funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities. at december 31, 2014, the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility. commercial paper program. on october 14, 2009, blackrock established a commercial paper program (the 201ccp program 201d) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the 201ccp notes 201d) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $3.0 billion. blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $3.5 billion in 2011 and to $3.785 billion in 2012. in april 2013, blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $3.990 billion. the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility. at december 31, 2014, blackrock had no cp notes outstanding. long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31, 2014 included the following: (in millions) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value.
(in millions) | maturity amount | unamortized discount | carrying value | fair value
1.375% (1.375%) notes due 2015 | $750 | $2014 | $750 | $753
6.25% (6.25%) notes due 2017 | 700 | -1 (1) | 699 | 785
5.00% (5.00%) notes due 2019 | 1000 | -2 (2) | 998 | 1134
4.25% (4.25%) notes due 2021 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 825
3.375% (3.375%) notes due 2022 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 783
3.50% (3.50%) notes due 2024 | 1000 | -3 (3) | 997 | 1029
total long-term borrowings | $4950 | $-12 (12) | $4938 | $5309
long-term borrowings at december 31, 2013 had a carrying value of $4.939 billion and a fair value of $5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013. 2024 notes. in march 2014, the company issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% (3.50%) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18, 2024 (the 201c2024 notes 201d). the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year, or approximately $35 million per year. the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $6 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes. at december 31, 2014, $6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2015 and 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes maturing in june 2015 (the 201c2015 notes 201d) and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $10 million and $25 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year, which commenced december 1, 2012. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes. at december 31, 2014, $4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities, including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes (201c2013 floating rate notes 201d), which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. (201cmerrill lynch 201d). interest.
what's the portion of fair value to carrying value? 1.07513
so what percentage higher is fair value than carrying value? 0.07513
what is the fair value of all notes due in 2015 and 2017? 1538.0
and including the value of notes due in 2019? | 2672.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015. see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage, partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales. the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects, primarily in the chemicals industry, and increased demand from new customers, primarily in the industrial gases industry. the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc. the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike. see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing. included in other is a provision of $23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding, offset by a provision of $32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding. a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding. entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015. amount (in millions).
- | amount (in millions)
2015 net revenue | $1666
nuclear realized price changes | -149 (149)
rhode island state energy center | -44 (44)
nuclear volume | -36 (36)
fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement | 41
nuclear fuel expenses | 68
other | -4 (4)
2016 net revenue | $1542
as shown in the table above, net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $124 million in 2016 primarily due to: 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices, the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa, and vermont yankee capacity revenue. the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015. see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015. see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis.
what was the 2016 net revenue? 1542.0
what was the 2015 net revenue? | 1666.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | table of contents adobe inc. notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes. the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized. we provide u.s. income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system. to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated, the related u.s. tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings. as of november 30, 2018, the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s. income taxes have not been provided is approximately $275 million. the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $57.8 million. as of november 30, 2018, we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $881.1 million for federal and $349.7 million for state. we also have federal, state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $8.8 million, $189.9 million and $14.9 million, respectively. the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036. the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely. the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382, the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized. as of november 30, 2018, a valuation allowance of $174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets. for fiscal 2018, the total change in the valuation allowance was $80.9 million. accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017, our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows (in thousands):.
- | 2018 | 2017
beginning balance | $172945 | $178413
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions | 16191 | 3680
gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions | -4000 (4000) | -30166 (30166)
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions | 60721 | 24927
settlements with taxing authorities | 2014 | -3876 (3876)
lapse of statute of limitations | -45922 (45922) | -8819 (8819)
foreign exchange gains and losses | -3783 (3783) | 8786
ending balance | $196152 | $172945
the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $24.6 million and $23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years. we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s. state and foreign jurisdictions. we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities. our major tax jurisdictions are ireland, california and the united states. for ireland, california and the united states, the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008, 2014 and 2015, respectively. we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations. we believe such estimates to be reasonable; however, there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position. the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process. these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets, liabilities and income taxes payable. we believe that within the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire, or both. given the uncertainties described above, we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $0 to approximately $45 million..
what was the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2018? | 196152.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above, certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs. these credit arrangements, which amounted to approximately $2.9 billion at december 31, 2015, and $3.2 billion at december 31, 2014, are for the sole use of our subsidiaries. borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $825 million at december 31, 2015, and $1.2 billion at december 31, 2014. commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s. and in europe. at december 31, 2015 and december 31, 2014, we had no commercial paper outstanding. effective april 19, 2013, our commercial paper program in the u.s. was increased by $2.0 billion. as a result, our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s. and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $8.0 billion. we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities, coupled with our operating cash flows, will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements. sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions. these arrangements allow us to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets. we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements, servicing and non-servicing. pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $888 million, $120 million and $146 million, respectively. the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. for further details, see item 8, note 23. sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements. debt 2013 our total debt was $28.5 billion at december 31, 2015, and $29.5 billion at december 31, 2014. our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature. for further details, see item 8, note 7. indebtedness. the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% (3.0%) in 2015, compared to 3.2% (3.2%) in 2014. see item 8, note 16. fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt. the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors. on february 21, 2014, we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s. securities and exchange commission, under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period. our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows: (in millions) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s. dollar notes (a) $500 1.250% (1.250%) august 2015 august 2017 u.s. dollar notes (a) $750 3.375% (3.375%) august 2015 august 2025 (a) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016. the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes. the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015. 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities, other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below..
type | - | face value | interest rate | issuance | maturity
u.s. dollar notes | (a) | $500 | 1.250% (1.250%) | august 2015 | august 2017
u.s. dollar notes | (a) | $750 | 3.375% (3.375%) | august 2015 | august 2025
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above, certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs. these credit arrangements, which amounted to approximately $2.9 billion at december 31, 2015, and $3.2 billion at december 31, 2014, are for the sole use of our subsidiaries. borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $825 million at december 31, 2015, and $1.2 billion at december 31, 2014. commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s. and in europe. at december 31, 2015 and december 31, 2014, we had no commercial paper outstanding. effective april 19, 2013, our commercial paper program in the u.s. was increased by $2.0 billion. as a result, our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s. and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $8.0 billion. we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities, coupled with our operating cash flows, will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements. sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions. these arrangements allow us to sell, on an ongoing basis, certain trade receivables without recourse. the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets. we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements, servicing and non-servicing. pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets, which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions. the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $888 million, $120 million and $146 million, respectively. the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. for further details, see item 8, note 23. sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements. debt 2013 our total debt was $28.5 billion at december 31, 2015, and $29.5 billion at december 31, 2014. our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature. for further details, see item 8, note 7. indebtedness. the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% (3.0%) in 2015, compared to 3.2% (3.2%) in 2014. see item 8, note 16. fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt. the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors. on february 21, 2014, we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s. securities and exchange commission, under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period. our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows: (in millions) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s. dollar notes (a) $500 1.250% (1.250%) august 2015 august 2017 u.s. dollar notes (a) $750 3.375% (3.375%) august 2015 august 2025 (a) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016. the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes. the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015. 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities, other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below..
what was the net change in total debt from 2014 to 2015? | -1.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | alexion pharmaceuticals, inc. notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) for the years ended december 31, 2007 and 2006, five month period ended december 31, 2005, and year ended july 31, 2005 (amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases (including facilities and equipment) as of december 31, 2007 are:.
2008 | $4935
2009 | 3144
2010 | 3160
2011 | 3200
2012 | 2768
thereafter | 9934
9. commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16, 2007, pdl biopharma, inc., or pdl, filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s. district court for the district of delaware. pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris. pdl seeks unspecified damages, but no less than a reasonable royalty, plus attorney 2019s fees. alexion has denied pdl's claims. in addition, we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s. patents held by pdl. alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims. on february 4, 2008, sb2, inc. filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california. sb2, inc. claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2, inc. patents due to sales of soliris. sb2, inc. seeks unspecified monetary damages, equitable relief and attorneys fees. alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims. the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages. however, depending on the outcome of these legal matters, the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales (see notes 2, 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties). product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18, 2002, or the lonza agreement, between lonza sales ag, or lonza, and us, relating to the manufacture of soliris, was amended in june 2007. we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $30000 to $35000 through 2013. such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances..
what was the minimum annual rental payment in 2011? | 3200.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | page 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 (e) of cercla. the usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $4 million and $5 million. based on the information available to the company at the present time, the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity, results of operations or financial condition of the company. europe in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk, wine, fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages. ball packaging europe gmbh (bpe), together with certain other plaintiffs, contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation (verpackungsverordnung) in federal and state administrative court. all other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases, together with minimal ancillary legal fees. the relevant industries, including bpe and its competitors, have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers, which has been operational since may 1, 2006, the date required under the deposit legislation. item 4. submission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007. part ii item 5. market for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock (bll) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange. there were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3, 2008. common stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31, 2007. purchases of securities total number of shares purchased (a) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (b).
- | total number of shares purchased (a) | average pricepaid per share | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (b)
october 1 to october 28 2007 | 705292 | $53.53 | 705292 | 4904824
october 29 to november 25 2007 | 431170 | $48.11 | 431170 | 4473654
november 26 to december 31 2007 | 8310 (c) | $44.99 | 8310 | 4465344
total | 1144772 | $51.42 | 1144772 | -
(a) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities. (b) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors. on january 23, 2008, ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock. this repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations. (c) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7, 2008, for approximately $31 million. also does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7, 2008..
what was the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during november 2007, in millions of dollars? | 20743588.7 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | jpmorgan chase & co./2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31, 2007. factors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion. for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations, see pages 96 201398 of this annual report. revenue.
year ended december 31 (in millions) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
investment banking fees | $6635 | $5520 | $4088
principal transactions | 9015 | 10778 | 8072
lending & deposit-related fees | 3938 | 3468 | 3389
asset management administration and commissions | 14356 | 11855 | 9988
securities gains (losses) | 164 | -543 (543) | -1336 (1336)
mortgage fees and related income | 2118 | 591 | 1054
credit card income | 6911 | 6913 | 6754
other income | 1829 | 2175 | 2684
noninterest revenue | 44966 | 40757 | 34693
net interest income | 26406 | 21242 | 19555
total net revenue | $71372 | $61999 | $54248
2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $71.4 billion was up $9.4 billion, or 15% (15%), from the prior year. higher net interest income, very strong private equity gains, record asset management, administration and commissions revenue, higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth. these increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue. investment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006. record advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results, partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees. for a further discussion of investment banking fees, which are primarily recorded in ib, see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report. principal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains. trading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level, primarily due to markdowns in ib of $1.4 billion (net of hedges) on subprime positions, including subprime cdos, and $1.3 billion (net of fees) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments. also in ib, markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities. equities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products. ib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year, primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities. the increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains, the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 (201cfair value measurements 201d). for a further discussion of principal transactions revenue, see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360, respectively, and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report. lending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level, driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction. for a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees, which are mostly recorded in rfs, tss and cb, see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348, the tss segment results on pages 54 201355, and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report. asset management, administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006. increased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results. the 18% (18%) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments: institutional, retail, private bank and private client services. tss also contributed to the rise in asset management, administration and commissions revenue, driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody. finally, commissions revenue increased, due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume (primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib), which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities. for additional information on these fees and commissions, see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342, rfs on pages 43 201348, tss on pages 54 201355, and am on pages 56 201358, of this annual report. the favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio. also contributing to the positive variance was a $234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares. for a fur- ther discussion of securities gains (losses), which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business, see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report. consol idated results of operat ions.
what were investment banking fees in 2007? 6635.0
what were they in 2006? 5520.0
what is the difference of the 2007 value less that in 2006? | 1115.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | investing activities for the year ended 30 september 2014, cash used for investing activities was $1638.0, primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment. for the year ended 30 september 2013, cash used for investing activities was $1697.0, primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions. for the year ended 30 september 2012, cash used for investing activities was $2435.2, primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment, acquisitions, and investments in unconsolidated affiliates. refer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail. capital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table:.
- | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
additions to plant and equipment | $1684.2 | $1524.2 | $1521.0
acquisitions less cash acquired | 2014 | 224.9 | 863.4
investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates | -2.0 (2.0) | -1.3 (1.3) | 175.4
capital expenditures on a gaap basis | $1682.2 | $1747.8 | $2559.8
capital lease expenditures (a) | 202.4 | 234.9 | 212.2
purchase of noncontrolling interests in asubsidiary (a) |.5 | 14.0 | 6.3
capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis | $1885.1 | $1996.7 | $2778.3
(a) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests. certain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases, and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities, if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease. additionally, the payment for subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. the presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures. capital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2014 totaled $1682.2, compared to $1747.8 in 2013. the decrease of $65.6 was primarily due to the acquisitions in 2013. additions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses. additions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine, ongoing nature, including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements. spending in 2014 and 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china, hydrogen to the global market, and renewable energy in the u.k. in 2013, we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use, net of cash acquired, of $224.9. in the fourth quarter, we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang, china. during the third quarter, we acquired epco, the largest independent u.s. producer of liquid carbon dioxide (co2), and wcg. in 2012, we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a. for $690 and e.i. dupont de nemours and co., inc. 2019s 50% (50%) interest in our joint venture, da nanomaterials for $147. we also purchased a 25% (25%) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co. ltd. (ahg), an unconsolidated affiliate, for $155. refer to note 5, business combinations, and note 7, summarized financial information of equity affiliates, to the consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding the acquisitions and the investments. capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2014 totaled $1885.1 compared to $1996.7 in 2013. capital lease expenditures of $202.4 decreased by $32.5, reflecting lower project spending. 2015 outlook excluding acquisitions, capital expenditures for new plant and equipment in 2015 on a gaap basis are expected to be between $1650 and $1800, and on a non-gaap basis are expected to be between $1700 and $1900. the non-gaap capital expenditures include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases, which are expected to be between $50 and $100. a majority of the total capital expenditures is expected to be for new plants. it is anticipated that capital expenditures will be funded principally with cash from continuing operations. in addition, we intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and investments in equity affiliates. financing activities for the year ended 2014, cash used by financing activities was $504.3 primarily attributable to cash used to pay dividends of $627.7, which was partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises of $141.6. our borrowings (short- and long-term proceeds, net of repayments) were a net source of cash (issuance) of $1.1 and included $148.7 of net commercial paper and other short-term debt issuances, debt proceeds from the issuance of a.
what were the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2012? 2778.3
and what were the capital expenditures on a gaap basis in that same year? | 2559.8 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | z i m m e r h o l d i n g s, i n c. a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k the following table sets forth the operating profit margin by cost of products sold. included in cost of product sold are segment for the years ended december 31, 2003, losses on foreign exchange hedge contracts, which increased 2002 and 2001: in 2003 relative to 2002. in the fourth quarter, the company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales of percent of net sales 47.1 percent for asia pacific..
year ended december 31, | 2003 | 2002 | 2001
americas | 51.2% (51.2%) | 48.3% (48.3%) | 47.4% (47.4%)
europe | 26.3 | 24.4 | 19.5
asia pacific | 45.3 | 46.1 | 45.4
operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales increased to 48.3 percent in 2002 from 47.4 percent in year ended december 31, 2003 2001, reflecting improved gross profit margins due to higher compared to year ended december 31, 2002 average selling prices and increased sales of higher margin operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net products, and lower selling expenses as a percent of sales sales increased due to improved gross margins driven by due to lower costs associated with the u.s. distributor higher average selling prices and increased sales of higher network. the americas continued to invest in strategic margin products, leveraged operating expenses and the initiatives such as mis technologies, field sales personnel, favorable impact of the change in accounting principle for medical education programs and new product launches. instruments. the change in accounting principle for operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of net instruments increased operating profit by 1.7 percentage sales increased to 46.1 percent in 2002 from 45.4 percent points. with respect to sales growth, increased zimmer in 2001. this increase reflects lower selling, general and standalone average selling prices of 4 percent in 2003 and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in japan as favorable effects of volume and mix, 15 percent increase in a result of a sales force and dealer reorganization, partially 2003, represent the most significant factors in improved offset by lower gross profit margins as a result of lower yen operating profit in the americas. as reconstructive implant hedge gains compared to 2001. sales grow at a higher rate than trauma and orthopaedic operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales surgical products, operating profit margins generally tend to increased to 24.4 percent in 2002 from 19.5 percent in 2001, improve since reconstructive product sales generally earn due to improved gross profit margins as a result of higher higher gross margins. this was the case in 2003, with zimmer average selling prices and favorable product and country mix, standalone reconstructive implant sales growth of 22 percent the leveraging of sales growth in europe on controlled as compared with total zimmer standalone sales growth of increases in operating expenses and improved efficiency 19 percent. in the fourth quarter, the company reported in the utilization of instruments (more frequent use of operating profit as a percent of net sales of 50.4 percent for instruments resulted in fewer placements and less expense). the americas. operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales liquidity and capital resources increased due to improved gross profit margins driven by cash flows provided by operations were $494.8 million higher zimmer standalone average selling prices and in 2003, compared with $220.2 million in 2002. the principal favorable product and country mix, leveraged operating source of cash was net earnings before cumulative effect of expenses and the favorable impact of the change in change in accounting principle of $291.2 million. non-cash accounting principle for instruments. the change in expenses for the period included depreciation and accounting for instruments increased operating profit by amortization expense of $103.3 million, centerpulse inventory 1.4 percentage points. increases in zimmer standalone step-up of $42.7 million and centerpulse in-process research average selling prices in europe of 2 percent in 2003 and the and development write-offs of $11.2 million. working capital effect of volume and mix, 19 percent increase in 2003, were management, together with the collection of $20.0 million of the key factors in improved operating profit. also cash related to centerpulse tax loss carryforwards, contributing to the improvement was significantly lower contributed $80.4 million to operating cash flow. growth in operating expenses. in the fourth quarter, the working capital continues to be a key management focus. company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales at december 31, 2003, the company had 62 days of sales of 24.7 percent for europe. outstanding in accounts receivable, unfavorable to the prior operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of year by 10 days. acquired centerpulse businesses had a net sales decreased primarily due to less favorable rates on negative impact of 10 days, due to centerpulse 2019s business hedge contracts during the year compared to the prior year, mix which has a greater proportion of european revenue with partially offset by increased zimmer standalone average payment terms generally longer than those in the u.s. at selling prices and leveraged operating expenses. the change december 31, 2003, the company had 232 days of inventory in accounting for instruments had an immaterial effect on on hand compared to 247 days reported at the end of 2002. operating profit for asia pacific. increases in zimmer the reduction was principally due to improved inventory standalone average selling prices in asia pacific of 1 percent management and the acquired dental and spinal businesses and volume and mix improvements of 4 percent in 2003 carrying fewer days of inventory. contributed modest improvement but was offset by higher.
what was the operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales in 2003? | 51.2 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | abiomed, inc. and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) note 14. income taxes (continued) on april 1, 2007, the company adopted financial interpretation fin no. 48, accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no. 109 (201cfin no. 48 201d), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no. 109, accounting for income taxes. fin no. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. fin no. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized. as a result of its adoption of fin no. 48, the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1, 2007. this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005. the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan, which it completed in fiscal year 2009. the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations. as of march 31, 2009, the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31, 2008. as such, the company had no fin no. 48 liability at march 31, 2009. on a quarterly basis, the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest. it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months; however, it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position. a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31, 2009 (in thousands) is as follows:.
balance at march 31 2008 | $168
reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations | -168 (168)
balance at march 31 2009 | $2014
the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s. federal income tax, as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981. all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions, including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts. however, since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income, those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized. note 15. commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows: 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device, a payment of $5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device, a payment of $5583333, and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide, a payment of $5583334. the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31, 2009. in april 2009, the company received fda 510 (k) clearance of its impella 5.0 product, triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device. in may 2009, the company paid $1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock..
what was the total of contingent payments related to impella? 16750002.0
and concerning the state tax settlement, what was its total due payment, in millions? 168.0
considering the number of years over which it was to be paid, what was its annual average cost? | 56.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | note 17 financial derivatives we use derivative financial instruments (derivatives) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income, fair value of assets and liabilities, and cash flows. we also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities. derivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract. derivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount, but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet. the notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract. the underlying is a referenced interest rate (commonly libor), security price, credit spread or other index. residential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments. the following table presents the notional amounts and gross fair values of all derivative assets and liabilities held by pnc: table 127: total gross derivatives.
in millions | december 31 2013 notional/contractamount | december 31 2013 assetfairvalue (a) | december 31 2013 liabilityfairvalue (b) | december 31 2013 notional/contractamount | december 31 2013 assetfairvalue (a) | liabilityfairvalue (b)
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap | $36197 | $1189 | $364 | $29270 | $1872 | $152
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap | 345059 | 3604 | 3570 | 337086 | 6696 | 6458
total gross derivatives | $381256 | $4793 | $3934 | $366356 | $8568 | $6610
(a) included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet. (b) included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. all derivatives are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value. derivative balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties. further discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the offsetting, counterparty credit risk, and contingent features section below. our exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the credit derivatives section below. any nonperformance risk, including credit risk, is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives. further discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in note 1 accounting policies. derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under gaap. derivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges, derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges, and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges. designating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives, to the extent effective, to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings. the pnc financial services group, inc. 2013 form 10-k 189.
in 2014, what percentage did the notional value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap represent in relation to the fair value? | 30.44323 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses. these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions. the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows; however, there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond. asset sales during 2003, we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries. this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity. the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003. sales proceeds project name date completed (in millions) location.
project name | date completed | sales proceeds (in millions) | location
cilcorp/medina valley | january 2003 | $495 | united states
aes ecogen/aes mt. stuart | january 2003 | $59 | australia
mountainview | march 2003 | $30 | united states
kelvin | march 2003 | $29 | south africa
songas | april 2003 | $94 | tanzania
aes barry limited | july 2003 | a340/$62 | united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd | december 2003 | $145 | bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi | august 2003 | $23 | republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited | november 2003 | a347/$78 | united kingdom
aes oasis limited | december 2003 | $150 | pakistan/oman
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future. however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet. for any sales that happen in the future, there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries. depending on which businesses are eventually sold, the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations. furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve. subsidiary restructuring during 2003, we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses. the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities. businesses impacted include eletropaulo, tiete, uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile. brazil eletropaulo. aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998, when the company was privatized. in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it. aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo, including both common and preferred shares, through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 (2018 2018bndes 2019 2019), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a. (2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019), to aes 2019s subsidiaries, aes elpa s.a. (2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019) and aes transgas empreendimentos, s.a. (2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019)..
what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia? 168.0
including november of that year, what then becomes that total? 246.0
what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in december 2003 in pakistan/oman, in millions? | 150.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (a) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds, certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds. (b) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1, 2005 and can then be remarketed. (c) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1, 2004 and can then be remarketed. (d) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1, 2003. entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders, pursuant to the mandatory tender provision, and has not remarketed the bonds at this time. entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds. (e) on june 1, 2002, entergy louisiana remarketed $55 million st. charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030, resetting the interest rate to 4.9% (4.9%) through may 2005. (f) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% (100%) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1, 2005 and can then be remarketed. (g) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982, entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service. the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7, 1983. entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee, plus accrued interest, in long-term (h) the fair value excludes lease obligations, long-term doe obligations, and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year. it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms. the annual long-term debt maturities (excluding lease obligations) for debt outstanding as of december 31, 2003, for the next five years are as follows:.
- | (in thousands)
2004 | $503215
2005 | $462420
2006 | $75896
2007 | $624539
2008 | $941625
in november 2000, entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction. entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing, and eight annual installments of $20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing. these notes do not have a stated interest rate, but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% (4.8%). in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa, the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $10 million per year for 10 years, beginning in september 2003. this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001, and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above. in july 2003, a payment of $102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa. under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes, if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness, entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit. covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% (65%) or less of its total capitalization. if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit, or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur..
what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005? | 965635.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | republic services, inc. notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) employee stock purchase plan republic employees are eligible to participate in an employee stock purchase plan. the plan allows participants to purchase our common stock for 95% (95%) of its quoted market price on the last day of each calendar quarter. for the years ended december 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, issuances under this plan totaled 113941 shares, 130085 shares and 141055 shares, respectively. as of december 31, 2017, shares reserved for issuance to employees under this plan totaled 0.4 million and republic held employee contributions of approximately $1.8 million for the purchase of common stock. 12. stock repurchases and dividends stock repurchases stock repurchase activity during the years ended december 31, 2017 and 2016 follows (in millions except per share amounts):.
- | 2017 | 2016
number of shares repurchased | 9.6 | 8.4
amount paid | $610.7 | $403.8
weighted average cost per share | $63.84 | $48.56
as of december 31, 2017, there were 0.5 million repurchased shares pending settlement and $33.8 million was unpaid and included within other accrued liabilities. in october 2017, our board of directors added $2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31, 2020. before this, $98.4 million remained under a prior authorization. share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. while the board of directors has approved the program, the timing of any purchases, the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management, at its discretion, and will depend upon market conditions and other factors. the share repurchase program may be extended, suspended or discontinued at any time. as of december 31, 2017, the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $1.8 billion. in december 2015, our board of directors changed the status of 71272964 treasury shares to authorized and unissued. in doing so, the number of our issued shares was reduced by the stated amount. our accounting policy is to deduct the par value from common stock and to reflect the excess of cost over par value as a deduction from additional paid-in capital. the change in unissued shares resulted in a reduction of $2295.3 million in treasury stock, $0.6 million in common stock, and $2294.7 million in additional paid-in capital. there was no effect on our total stockholders 2019 equity position as a result of the change. dividends in october 2017, our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.345 per share. cash dividends declared were $446.3 million, $423.8 million and $404.3 million for the years ended december 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. as of december 31, 2017, we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $114.4 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2, 2018. 13. earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services, inc. by the weighted average number of common shares (including vested but unissued rsus) outstanding during the.
what was the change in the number of shares of the issuance under the employee stock purchase plan from 2016 to 2017? | -16144.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 (continued) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years. for the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares, 1230881 shares, and 638401 shares, respectively. 19. related party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda. the trustees are principally comprised of ace management. the company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda, the balance of which was $30 million and $31 million, at december 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. the receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. the borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate, some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent, professional real estate appraisers. the borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities. accordingly, the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan, including the real estate properties. 20. statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate. these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions, such as loans or cash advances, available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities. there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries. the company 2019s u.s. subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators. statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts, investments, subsidiaries, acquis- ition expenses, fixed assets, deferred income taxes, and certain other items. the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s. subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010, 2009, and 2008. the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011, without prior approval from the state insurance departments, totals $850 million. the following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s. subsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008..
(in millions of u.s. dollars) | bermuda subsidiaries 2010 | bermuda subsidiaries 2009 | bermuda subsidiaries 2008 | bermuda subsidiaries 2010 | bermuda subsidiaries 2009 | 2008
statutory capital and surplus | $11798 | $9164 | $6205 | $6266 | $5885 | $5368
statutory net income | $2430 | $2369 | $2196 | $1047 | $904 | $818
as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7, certain of the company 2019s u.s. subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities, which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $206 million, $215 million, and $211 million at december 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations. some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements. in some countries, the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business. these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests. jurisdictions may impose fines, censure, and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements..
what was the amount of statutory capital and surplus for bermuda subsidiaries in 2010? 11798.0
and what was it in 2009? 9164.0
by how much, then, did it increase over the year? 2634.0
in that same period, what was the change in the net income for those same bermuda subsidiaries? | 61.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | of prior service cost or credits, and net actuarial gains or losses) as part of non-operating income. we adopted the requirements of asu no. 2017-07 on january 1, 2018 using the retrospective transition method. we expect the adoption of asu no. 2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $471 million and $846 million for 2016 and 2017, respectively, and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year. we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit, our consolidated net earnings, or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no. 2017-07. intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017, the fasb issued asu no. 2017-04, intangibles-goodwill and other (topic 350), which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill (commonly referred to as step 2) from the goodwill impairment test. the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified. wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount, but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge, under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount. under the prior standard, if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge, step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance. the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption. we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017, because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment. the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests. derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017, the fasb issuedasu no. 2017-12derivatives and hedging (topic 815), which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities, net earnings, or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard. we plan to adopt the new standard january 1, 2019. leases in february 2016, the fasb issuedasu no. 2016-02, leases (topic 842), which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors. the new standard is effective january 1, 2019 for public companies, with early adoption permitted. the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements. we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1, 2019. note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows (in millions):.
- | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 287.8 | 299.3 | 310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 290.6 | 303.1 | 314.7
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented. our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units (rsus), performance stock units (psus) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method. there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6, 2015, we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation (utc) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries. the purchase price of the acquisition was $9.0 billion, net of cash acquired. as a result of the acquisition.
what is the sum of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2017 and 2016? | 593.7 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15, 2008. we will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no. 141 (r) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter. in december 2007, the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no. 160, noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no. 51. a noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. statement no. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. under statement no. 160, noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity. additionally, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement. statement no. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. we do not expect the adoption of statement no. 160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures. 2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends, the information that was used to prepare the december 31, 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties. these forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand, curtailment, producibility and general market conditions for our oil, natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007, unless otherwise noted. we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report. amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s. dollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $0.98 u.s. dollar to $1.00 canadian dollar. in january 2007, we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa, including equatorial guinea, cote d 2019ivoire, gabon and other countries in the region. in november 2007, we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $205.5 million. we are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package. we are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008. all west african related revenues, expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements. accordingly, all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa, unless otherwise noted. though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years, these transactions are opportunity driven. thus, the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008, except for west africa as previously discussed. oil, gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil, gas and ngl production for 2008. we estimate that our combined 2008 oil, gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe. of this total, approximately 92% (92%) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31, 2007. the following estimates for oil, gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production. oil gas ngls total (mmbbls) (bcf) (mmbbls) (mmboe).
- | oil (mmbbls) | gas (bcf) | ngls (mmbbls) | total (mmboe)
u.s. onshore | 12 | 626 | 23 | 140
u.s. offshore | 8 | 68 | 1 | 20
canada | 23 | 198 | 4 | 60
international | 23 | 2 | 2014 | 23
total | 66 | 894 | 28 | 243
.
what is the value of mmboe from canada divided by the total? | 0.24691 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | item 5. market for the registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock, the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index (201cs&p 500 index 201d) and our peer group (201cloews peer group 201d) for the five years ended december 31, 2015. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $100 on december 31, 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested..
- | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015
loews common stock | 100.0 | 97.37 | 106.04 | 126.23 | 110.59 | 101.72
s&p 500 index | 100.0 | 102.11 | 118.45 | 156.82 | 178.29 | 180.75
loews peer group (a) | 100.0 | 101.59 | 115.19 | 145.12 | 152.84 | 144.70
(a) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries: ace limited, w.r. berkley corporation, the chubb corporation, energy transfer partners l.p., ensco plc, the hartford financial services group, inc., kinder morgan energy partners, l.p. (included through november 26, 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc.), noble corporation, spectra energy corp, transocean ltd. and the travelers companies, inc. dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967. regular dividends of $0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014..
from 2010 to 2011, what was the change in the value of the loews common stock? -2.63
and what was this change as a portion of the 2010 value of that stock? | -0.0263 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements (continued) 7. acquisitions (continued) was recorded to goodwill. the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in millions):.
current assets | $28.1
property and equipment net | 0.2
goodwill | 258.9
ipr&d | 190.0
current liabilities assumed | -32.9 (32.9)
deferred income taxes | -66.0 (66.0)
contingent consideration | -30.3 (30.3)
total cash purchase price | 348.0
less: cash acquired | -27.9 (27.9)
total cash purchase price net of cash acquired | $320.1
goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition. goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes. ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods. the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach. this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return. the discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% (16.5%). completion of successful design developments, bench testing, pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product. the risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design, development, and manufacturability of the product, the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies, and the timing of regulatory approvals. the valuation assumed $97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction, and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program. the company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018, if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval. upon completion of development, the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life. the company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve. this testing has been completed and, in collaboration with clinical investigators, the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials. the results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. pro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company. 8. goodwill and other intangible assets on july 3, 2015, the company acquired cardiaq (see note 7). this transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $258.9 million and ipr&d of $190.0 million..
what is the amount of the goodwill? 258.9
and what is the total cash purchase price net of cash acquired? | 320.1 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | entergy new orleans, inc. management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007. amount (in millions).
- | amount (in millions)
2007 net revenue | $231.0
volume/weather | 15.5
net gas revenue | 6.6
rider revenue | 3.9
base revenue | -11.3 (11.3)
other | 7.0
2008 net revenue | $252.7
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31, 2008, compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31, 2007. billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007, an increase of 4% (4%). the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007. refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase. the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006. the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account. the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit, effective january 2008. the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to: an increase of $58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales; an increase of $47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage; and an increase of $22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007. fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand..
what is the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008? 21.7
what is that divided by the 2007 net revenues? | 0.09394 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | table of contents the estimated amortization expense at september 26, 2015 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years was as follows:.
fiscal 2016 | $377.0
fiscal 2017 | $365.6
fiscal 2018 | $355.1
fiscal 2019 | $343.5
fiscal 2020 | $332.3
goodwill in accordance with asc 350, intangibles 2014goodwill and other (asc 350), the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. events that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, current economic and market conditions, including a decline in market capitalization, a significant adverse change in legal factors, business climate, operational performance of the business or key personnel, and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. in performing the impairment test, the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350. the first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value. to estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1, the company primarily utilizes the income approach. the income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. assumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values, growth rates, and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. the forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period, the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date. the company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses. the discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital (201cwacc 201d) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit. the market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (201cebitda 201d) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis. the company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable. if different assumptions were used, particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows, terminal values, waccs, or market multiples, different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result. actual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows. if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value. the implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities. the residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill. to the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded. the company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter, and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28, 2015, and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions. the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue, cost projections, cash flows, market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date. as a result of completing step 1, all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values, and as such, step 2 of the impairment test was not required. for illustrative purposes, had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% (10%), all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. at september 26, 2015, the company believes that each reporting unit, with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion, was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts. the company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter, and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29, 2014, and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions. the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue, cost projections, cash flows, market multiples and discount rates as source: hologic inc, 10-k, november 19, 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied, adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law. past financial performance is no guarantee of future results..
what was the net change in value of the amortization expense from 2016 to 2017? -11.4
what was the value in 2016? | 377.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) december 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018. aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico. therefore, we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa. starting prior to the hurricanes, prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company, and on july 2, 2017, filed for bankruptcy under title iii. as a result of the bankruptcy filing, aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $365 million and $36 million, respectively, is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31, 2017. in november 2017, aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events. this agreement will expire on march 22, 2018. the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31, 2017 totaled $86 million, of which $53 million was overdue. after the filing of title iii protection, and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes, aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns. considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $627 million is recoverable as of december 31, 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required. foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s. dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows: the argentine peso, the brazilian real, the dominican republic peso, the euro, the chilean peso, the colombian peso, and the philippine peso. concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations, the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply. several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas. however, no single customer accounted for 10% (10%) or more of total revenue in 2017, 2016 or 2015. the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements. if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated, the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms. 26. related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions. in the ordinary course of business, these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions, and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments. at two of our generation businesses in mexico, the offtakers exercise significant influence, but not control, through representation on these businesses' boards of directors. these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses. in chile, we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. additionally, the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements. the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated (in millions):.
years ended december 31, | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
revenue 2014non-regulated | $1297 | $1100 | $1099
cost of sales 2014non-regulated | 220 | 210 | 330
interest income | 8 | 4 | 25
interest expense | 36 | 39 | 33
.
what was the total of revenues for transactions with related parties in 2017? 1297.0
and what was that in 2016? | 1100.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies. the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $48 million at december 31, 2011. aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding. some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $64 million at december 31, 2011. during 2011, the company funded $15 million of these commitments. aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate, additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time. 17. related party transactions during 2011, the company, in the ordinary course of business, provided retail brokerage, consulting and financial advisory services to, and received wholesale brokerage services from, an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders. these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions. during 2011, commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $9 million. 18. segment information the company has two reportable operating segments: risk solutions and hr solutions. unallocated income and expenses, when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses, total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements. reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker (2018 2018codm 2019 2019) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices. the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm. risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker, helping clients manage their risks, via consultation, as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network. hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits, talent and related financial challenges, and improve business performance by designing, implementing, communicating and administering a wide range of human capital, retirement, investment management, health care, compensation and talent management strategies. aon 2019s total revenue is as follows (in millions):.
years ended december 31 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
risk solutions | $6817 | $6423 | $6305
hr solutions | 4501 | 2111 | 1267
intersegment elimination | -31 (31) | -22 (22) | -26 (26)
total operating segments | 11287 | 8512 | 7546
unallocated | 2014 | 2014 | 49
total revenue | $11287 | $8512 | $7595
.
what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011? | 394.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity, capital resources and uses of capital..
cash flow data | years ended december 31, 2015 | years ended december 31, 2014 | years ended december 31, 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $848.2 | $831.2 | $598.4
net cash used in working capital2 | -117.5 (117.5) | -131.1 (131.1) | -9.6 (9.6)
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -56.7 (56.7) | -30.6 (30.6) | 4.1
net cash provided by operating activities | $674.0 | $669.5 | $592.9
net cash used in investing activities | -202.8 (202.8) | -200.8 (200.8) | -224.5 (224.5)
net cash used in financing activities | -472.8 (472.8) | -343.9 (343.9) | -1212.3 (1212.3)
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets, amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation, non-cash (gain) loss related to early extinguishment of debt, losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes. 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $674.0, which was an improvement of $4.5 as compared to 2014, primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $13.6. due to the seasonality of our business, we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year, with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters. our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses. net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $669.5, which was an improvement of $76.6 as compared to 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in net income, offset by an increase in working capital usage of $121.5. our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses. the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow. in most of our businesses, our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients. to the extent possible, we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients. the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements, while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers. our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments. for example, while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year, they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year. investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $161.1, largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware. net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions. capital expenditures of $148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements. we made payments of $67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014, net of cash acquired..
what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015? | 17.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31, 2013 included the following: (in millions) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value.
(in millions) | maturity amount | unamortized discount | carrying value | fair value
3.50% (3.50%) notes due 2014 | $1000 | $2014 | $1000 | $1029
1.375% (1.375%) notes due 2015 | 750 | 2014 | 750 | 759
6.25% (6.25%) notes due 2017 | 700 | -2 (2) | 698 | 812
5.00% (5.00%) notes due 2019 | 1000 | -2 (2) | 998 | 1140
4.25% (4.25%) notes due 2021 | 750 | -3 (3) | 747 | 799
3.375% (3.375%) notes due 2022 | 750 | -4 (4) | 746 | 745
total long-term borrowings | $4950 | $-11 (11) | $4939 | $5284
long-term borrowings at december 31, 2012 had a carrying value of $5.687 billion and a fair value of $6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012. 2015 and 2022 notes. in may 2012, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $750 million of 1.375% (1.375%) notes maturing in june 2015 (the 201c2015 notes 201d) and $750 million of 3.375% (3.375%) notes maturing in june 2022 (the 201c2022 notes 201d). net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $10 million and $25 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year, which commenced december 1, 2012. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price, subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture, that is the greater of (a) par value and (b) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption, which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security. the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes. at december 31, 2013, $5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2013 and 2021 notes. in may 2011, the company issued $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $750 million of 4.25% (4.25%) notes maturing in may 2021 and $750 million of floating rate notes (201c2013 floating rate notes 201d), which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity. net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co., inc. (201cmerrill lynch 201d). interest on the 4.25% (4.25%) notes due in 2021 (201c2021 notes 201d) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year, which commenced november 24, 2011, and is approximately $32 million per year. the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes. the company incurred approximately $7 million of debt issuance costs for the $1.5 billion note issuances, which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes. at december 31, 2013, $3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. in may 2011, in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes, the company entered into a $750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% (1.03%). during the second quarter of 2013, the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid. 2012, 2014 and 2019 notes. in december 2009, the company issued $2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $0.5 billion of 2.25% (2.25%) notes, which were repaid in december 2012, $1.0 billion of 3.50% (3.50%) notes and $1.0 billion of 5.0% (5.0%) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019, respectively. net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program, which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors (201cbgi 201d) from barclays on december 1, 2009 (the 201cbgi transaction 201d), and for general corporate purposes. interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $35 million and $50 million per year, respectively, is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year. these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price. these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $5 million, which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes. the company incurred approximately $13 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes. at december 31, 2013, $4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition. 2017 notes. in september 2007, the company issued $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% (6.25%) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15, 2017 (the 201c2017 notes 201d). a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes. interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year, or approximately $44 million per year. the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior.
what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes? 345.0
and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014? 1000.0
what was it for 2015? 750.0
what was, then, the total carrying value for both years? | 1750.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the analysis of our depreciation studies. changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively. under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using (i) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies. the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. in addition, we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies. any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets. for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies. a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations. when we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. however, many of our assets are self-constructed. a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties, which is typically performed by our employees, and for track line expansion and other capacity projects. costs that are directly attributable to capital projects (including overhead costs) are capitalized. direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset. general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred. normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred, while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized. these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.4 billion for 2014, $2.3 billion for 2013, and $2.1 billion for 2012. assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease. 13. accounts payable and other current liabilities dec. 31, dec. 31, millions 2014 2013.
millions | dec. 31 2014 | dec. 312013
accounts payable | $877 | $803
dividends payable | 438 | 356
income and other taxes payable | 412 | 491
accrued wages and vacation | 409 | 385
accrued casualty costs | 249 | 207
interest payable | 178 | 169
equipment rents payable | 100 | 96
other | 640 | 579
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities | $3303 | $3086
.
what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013? 2.3
and in 2012? 2.1
what was the difference between the two values? 0.2
and the specific value for 2012 again? | 2.1 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information. the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange (nyse) under the symbol 2018 2018aes. 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated. price range of common stock.
2002 first quarter | high $17.84 | low $4.11 | 2001 first quarter | high $60.15 | low $41.30
second quarter | 9.17 | 3.55 | second quarter | 52.25 | 39.95
third quarter | 4.61 | 1.56 | third quarter | 44.50 | 12.00
fourth quarter | 3.57 | 0.95 | fourth quarter | 17.80 | 11.60
holders. as of march 3, 2003, there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock, par value $0.01 per share. dividends. under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate, the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends. in addition, the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met. the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans, governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries. securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1, 2003, which information is incorporated herein by reference..
what was the variance in the price of common stock from low to high in the first quarter of 2002? 13.73
what was the high price of common stock in the first quarter of 2001? 60.15
and what was the low price? 41.3
what was, then, the variance in that price from low to high? | 18.85 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | december 31, 2011, the company recognized a decrease of $3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $16 million accrued at december 31, 2011. note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices, which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations. management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments, including futures, options, and swaps, where appropriate, to manage these risks. instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract. the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges, fair value hedges, net investment hedges, and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates, foreign currency and commodities. as a matter of policy, the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions. total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28, 2013 and december 29, 2012 were as follows:.
(millions) | 2013 | 2012
foreign currency exchange contracts | $517 | $570
interest rate contracts | 2400 | 2150
commodity contracts | 361 | 320
total | $3278 | $3040
following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28, 2013 and december 29, 2012, measured on a recurring basis. level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. for the company, level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts. level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. for the company, level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts. the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve. over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance, including counterparty credit risk. level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28, 2013 or december 29, 2012..
what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011? 16.0
what was the value decrease during the year? 3.0
what is the sum? 19.0
what was the value decrease during the year? | 3.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | tissue pulp due to strong market demand, partic- ularly from asia. average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007, principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood, hardwood and fluff pulp. operating earnings in 2007 were $104 mil- lion compared with $48 million in 2006 and $37 mil- lion in 2005. the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy, chemicals and freight. entering the first quarter of 2008, demand for market pulp remains strong, and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly. however, input costs for energy, chemicals and freight are expected to be higher, and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages. industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction, as well as with demand for processed foods, poultry, meat and agricultural products. in addition to prices and volumes, major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs, freight costs, manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix. industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% (6%) to $5.2 billion compared with $4.9 bil- lion in 2006, and 13% (13%) compared with $4.6 billion in 2005. operating profits in 2007 were 26% (26%) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings. bene- fits from improved price realizations ($147 million), sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ($3 million), a more favorable mix ($31 million), strong mill and converting operations ($33 million) and other costs ($47 million) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ($76 million) and higher freight costs ($18 million). in addition, a gain of $13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard. the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related. industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005.
in millions | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
sales | $5245 | $4925 | $4625
operating profit | $501 | $399 | $219
north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $3.9 billion, compared with $3.7 billion in 2006 and $3.6 billion in 2005. operating profits in 2007 were $407 million, up from $327 mil- lion in 2006 and $170 million in 2005. containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006, including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007. average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007. margins improved reflecting stronger export demand. manu- facturing performance was strong, although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages. raw material costs for wood, energy, chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly. operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine. u.s. converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand. earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007. favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs. looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008, sales volumes are expected to increase slightly, and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007. however, additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter, and freight and input costs are expected to rise, particularly for wood and energy. manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter. european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $1.1 billion, up from $1.0 billion in 2006 and $880 million in 2005. sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year. operating profits in 2007 were $88 million compared with $69 million in 2006 and $53 million in 2005. sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes. conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs. entering the first quarter of 2008, sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues. profit margins, however, are expected to be somewhat lower..
in the year of 2007, what was the amount of the industrial packaging sales that was from europe, in millions? 1100.0
and what was the total of those sales? | 5245.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008: number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs.
- | total number of shares purchased | average price paid per share2 | total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
october 1-31 | 29704 | $5.99 | 2014 | 2014
november 1-30 | 4468 | $3.24 | 2014 | 2014
december 1-31 | 12850 | $3.98 | 2014 | 2014
total1 | 47022 | $5.18 | 2014 | 2014
total1................................ 47022 $5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 (the 201cwithheld shares 201d). 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month..
what is the sum of the average price per share in november and december? 7.22
what is that divided by 2? | 3.61 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007, 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows: program program program total.
- | 2007 program | 2003 program | 2001 program | total
liability at december 31 2006 | $2014 | $12.6 | $19.2 | $31.8
net charges (reversals) and adjustments | 19.1 | -0.5 (0.5) | -5.2 (5.2) | 13.4
payments and other1 | -7.2 (7.2) | -3.1 (3.1) | -5.3 (5.3) | -15.6 (15.6)
liability at december 31 2007 | $11.9 | $9.0 | $8.7 | $29.6
net charges and adjustments | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 5.8
payments and other1 | -15.0 (15.0) | -4.1 (4.1) | -3.5 (3.5) | -22.6 (22.6)
liability at december 31 2008 | $1.2 | $5.7 | $5.9 | $12.8
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates. other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote, cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb. charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs. we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009. charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete. the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business..
what was the total liability by the end of 2008? 29.6
and what was it by the end of 2007? 12.8
what was, then, the change over the year? 16.8
what was the total liability by the end of 2008? 29.6
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability? | 0.56757 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31:.
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010
fair value | $99832 | $81881
amortized cost | 100013 | 82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax | $-181 (181) | $-448 (448)
net unrealized loss after-tax | $-113 (113) | $-270 (270)
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $303 million, or $189 million after-tax, and $523 million, or $317 million after-tax, as of december 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, or oci. refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8. the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31, 2010 to december 31, 2011 resulted primarily from amortization. we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified, the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component. the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income, and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security. our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation, more fully described in note 3, of economic and security-specific factors. such factors are based on estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations, other-than-temporary impairment could increase, in particular, the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income. given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio, particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities, to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks, the performance of the u.s. housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance. as such, our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices. generally, indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears. as of september 30, 2011, national housing prices, according to the case-shiller national home price index, had declined by approximately 31.3% (31.3%) peak-to-current. overall, management 2019s expectation, for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31, 2011, was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% (35%) peak-to-trough. the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate. in addition, management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above. the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations. our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses. ultimately, other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security. in addition, we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s. residential mortgage-backed portfolio. we estimate, for example, that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $10 million to $50 million, if national housing prices were to decline by 37% (37%) to 39% (39%) peak-to-trough, compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% (35%) described above. this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults. to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations, resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated. excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining.
what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax? 303.0
and what was it after tax? | 189.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | south america. approximately 26% (26%) of 2017 net sales were to international markets. this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives, primarily to wholesalers, home centers, mass merchandisers and industrial distributors. in aggregate, sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% (23%) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017. this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta (owned by masco), kohler, pfister (owned by spectrum brands), american standard (owned by lixil group), insinkerator (owned by emerson electronic company) and imported private-label brands. doors. our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand. this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials, such as wood, steel and aluminum, toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials. therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems, primarily for sale in the u.s. and canada. this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers, millwork building products and wholesale distributors, and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market, as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets. in aggregate, sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% (14%) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017. this segment 2019s competitors include masonite, jeld-wen, plastpro and pella. security. our security segment 2019s products consist of locks, safety and security devices, and electronic security products manufactured, sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes, security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured, sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand. this segment sells products principally in the u.s., canada, europe, central america, japan and australia. approximately 25% (25%) of 2017 net sales were to international markets. this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks, bicycle and cable locks, built-in locker locks, door hardware, automotive, trailer and towing locks, electronic access control solutions, and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware, home center and other retail outlets. in addition, the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths, industrial and institutional users, and original equipment manufacturers. in aggregate, sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% (18%) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017. master lock competes with abus, w.h. brady, hampton, kwikset (owned by spectrum brands), schlage (owned by allegion), assa abloy and various imports, and sentrysafe competes with first alert, magnum, fortress, stack-on and fire king. annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows: (in millions) 2017 2016 2015.
(in millions) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
cabinets | $2467.1 | $2397.8 | $2173.4
plumbing | 1720.8 | 1534.4 | 1414.5
doors | 502.9 | 473.0 | 439.1
security | 592.5 | 579.7 | 552.4
total | $5283.3 | $4984.9 | $4579.4
for additional financial information for each of our business segments, refer to note 18, 201cinformation on business segments, 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials. the table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments. these materials are available from a number of sources. volatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products..
in the year of 2017, what percentage of the net sales were for international markets? 0.25
and what were those net sales? 5283.3
what, then, was the amount correspondent to that percentage? 1320.825
and from 2016 to that year, what was the increase in the sales of cabinets? 69.3
what percentage did this increase represent in relation to those sales in 2016? | 0.0289 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth, higher offer costs and continued investment in presto, partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations. net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above, partially offset by lower income tax expense. (b) other equity affiliates, net for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies, which owns proptiger. interest, net 2014interest, net for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016 decreased $13 million, or 23% (23%), as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility. (see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements). other, net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30.
(in millions) | for the fiscal years ended june 30, 2016 | for the fiscal years ended june 30, 2015
gain on iproperty transaction (a) | $29 | $2014
impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments (b) | -21 (21) | -5 (5)
gain on sale of marketable securities (c) | 2014 | 29
dividends received from cost method investments | 2014 | 25
gain on sale of cost method investments | 2014 | 15
other | 10 | 11
total other net | $18 | $75
(a) rea group recognized a gain of $29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016. (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). (b) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30, 2016 and 2015. these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery. (see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.) (c) in august 2014, rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $104 million. as a result of the sale, rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $29 million, which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other, net in the statement of operations. income tax benefit (expense) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016 were $54 million and (30% (30%)), respectively, as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $185 million and 34% (34%), respectively, for fiscal 2015. for the fiscal years ended june 30, 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $54 million on pre-tax income of $181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s. statutory tax. the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s. federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets. this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s. taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration. in addition, the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty. for the fiscal year ended june 30, 2015, the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s. statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates, partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions. (see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements)..
what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016? 13.0
and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest? | 0.23 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% (1%) change in the assumed health care trend rate. for most of the participants in the u.s. plan, aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% (5%) per annum. because of this cap, net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% (5%) per year in the future. during 2007, aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s. plan over the next three years. the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees. 14. stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits (in millions):.
years ended december 31 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
rsus | $138 | $124 | $132
performance plans | 62 | 60 | 67
stock options | 17 | 21 | 24
employee stock purchase plans | 4 | 4 | 3
total stock-based compensation expense | 221 | 209 | 226
tax benefit | 75 | 68 | 82
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $146 | $141 | $144
during 2009, the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider. in connection with this conversion, a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed, which resulted in a $12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31, 2009. stock awards stock awards, in the form of rsus, are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus. service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant. the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. with certain limited exceptions, any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards. compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period. dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus, based on the initial grant amount. performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees. vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual, divisional or company-wide performance conditions, including revenue generation or growth in revenue, pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period. the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards. the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. compensation expense is recognized over the performance period, and in certain cases an additional vesting period, based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest. compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs. the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% (0-200%) of the number of units granted, based on the plan. dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus. during 2010, the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan (2018 2018lpp 2019 2019) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans. during 2010, 2009 and 2008, the company granted approximately 3.5 million.
what was the change in the rsus from 2009 to 2010? 14.0
and how much does this change represent in relation to that rsus in 2009, in percentage? | 0.1129 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 15. debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015: total debt.
30 september | 2016 | 2015
short-term borrowings | $935.8 | $1494.3
current portion of long-term debt | 371.3 | 435.6
long-term debt | 4918.1 | 3949.1
total debt | $6225.2 | $5879.0
short-term borrowings | - | -
30 september | 2016 | 2015
bank obligations | $133.1 | $234.3
commercial paper | 802.7 | 1260.0
total short-term borrowings | $935.8 | $1494.3
the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% (1.1%) and.8% (.8%), respectively. cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was $121.1 in 2016, $97.5 in 2015, and $132.4 in 2014..
what was the total of short-term borrowings in 2016? | 935.8 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales decreased $305 million, or 3% (3%), in 2014 as compared to 2013. net sales decreased by approximately $305 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain c4isr programs (primarily ptds); about $85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries; and about $55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 (including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program). the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume (primarily space fence); and approximately $40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries (primarily close combat tactical trainer). mst 2019s operating profit decreased $129 million, or 12% (12%), in 2014 as compared to 2013. the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 (including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program); approximately $55 million due to the reasons described above for lower c4isr program sales, as well as performance matters on an international program; and approximately $45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs. the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014; and about $60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements (including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs). adjustments not related to volume, including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters, were approximately $85 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. backlog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the addition of sikorsky backlog, as well as higher orders on new program starts (such as australian defence force pilot training system). backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts (such as space fence). trends we expect mst 2019s 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-double digit percentage range compared to 2015 net sales due to the inclusion of sikorsky programs for a full year, partially offset by a decline in volume due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs. operating profit is expected to be equivalent to 2015 on higher volume, and operating margin is expected to decline due to costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition, including the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, integration costs and inherited restructuring costs associated with actions committed to by sikorsky prior to acquisition. space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development, design, engineering and production of satellites, strategic and defensive missile systems and space transportation systems. space systems provides network-enabled situational awareness and integrates complex global systems to help our customers gather, analyze, and securely distribute critical intelligence data. space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems. space systems 2019 major programs include the trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile (fbm), orion, space based infrared system (sbirs), aehf, gps-iii, geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series (goes-r), and muos. operating profit for our space systems business segment includes our share of earnings for our investment in ula, which provides expendable launch services to the u.s. government. space systems 2019 operating results included the following (in millions):.
- | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
net sales | $9105 | $9202 | $9288
operating profit | 1171 | 1187 | 1198
operating margins | 12.9% (12.9%) | 12.9% (12.9%) | 12.9% (12.9%)
backlog at year-end | $17400 | $20300 | $21400
2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $97 million, or 1% (1%), compared to 2014. the decrease was attributable to approximately $335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume (primarily aehf) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs; and approximately $55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume. these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $235 million for businesses acquired in 2014; and approximately $75 million for the orion program due to increased volume..
what was the average backlog in 2015? 17400.0
what was it in 2014? 20300.0
what is the sum of those years? 37700.0
what was the average backlog in 2013? 21400.0
what is the total sum for all 3 years? 59100.0
what is the average per year? | 19700.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934, as amended (the 201cexchange act 201d) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933, as amended, or the exchange act. the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28, 2013 to december 29, 2018 (the company 2019s fiscal year-end), with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period. the comparison assumes that $100 was invested on december 28, 2013, in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends. the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance..
- | 12/28/2013 | 12/27/2014 | 12/26/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/30/2017 | 12/29/2018
tractor supply company | $100.00 | $104.11 | $115.45 | $103.33 | $103.67 | $117.18
s&p 500 | $100.00 | $115.76 | $116.64 | $129.55 | $157.84 | $149.63
s&p retail index | $100.00 | $111.18 | $140.22 | $148.53 | $193.68 | $217.01
.
what was the price of the tractor supply company stock in 2014? | 104.11 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1. summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries, inc. (201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d) and all subsidiaries, both u.s. and non-u.s., that it controls. ppg owns more than 50% (50%) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls. for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% (100%), the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests. investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% (20%) to 50% (50%) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. as a result, ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in "investments" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation. use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated. actual outcomes could differ from those estimates. revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete. revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered. shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. selling, general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling, general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling, customer service, distribution and advertising costs, as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance, law, human resources and planning. distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses, terminals and other distribution facilities. advertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $345 million, $288 million and $245 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. research and development research and development costs, which consist primarily of employee related costs, are charged to expense as incurred. the following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31:.
(millions) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
research and development 2013 total | $505 | $468 | $443
less depreciation on research facilities | 17 | 15 | 15
research and development net | $488 | $453 | $428
legal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred. legal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions, general litigation, environmental regulation compliance, patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes. foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s. operations is their local currency. assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s. dollars using year-end exchange rates; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period. unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity. cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments (valued at cost, which approximates fair value) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less. short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid, high credit quality investments (valued at cost plus accrued interest) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year. the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income, net of tax, for those designated as available for sale securities..
what was the difference in research and development net between 2011 and 2012? 25.0
and the specific value for 2011 again? 428.0
then what was the percentage change during this time? | 0.05841 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | part ii item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange (201cnyse 201d) for the years 2008 and 2007..
2008 | high | low
quarter ended march 31 | $42.72 | $32.10
quarter ended june 30 | 46.10 | 38.53
quarter ended september 30 | 43.43 | 31.89
quarter ended december 31 | 37.28 | 19.35
2007 | high | low
quarter ended march 31 | $41.31 | $36.63
quarter ended june 30 | 43.84 | 37.64
quarter ended september 30 | 45.45 | 36.34
quarter ended december 31 | 46.53 | 40.08
on february 13, 2009, the closing price of our common stock was $28.85 per share as reported on the nyse. as of february 13, 2009, we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders. dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock. we anticipate that we may retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. the indentures governing our 7.50% (7.50%) senior notes due 2012 (201c7.50% (201c7.50%) notes 201d) and our 7.125% (7.125%) senior notes due 2012 (201c7.125% (201c7.125%) notes 201d) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants. the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan, and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% (7.50%) notes and 7.125% (7.125%) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied. in addition, while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% (7.50%) notes and 7.125% (7.125%) notes, certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction. for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan, our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction, see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report..
what was the price of shares in february of 2009? 37.28
and what was it in by the end of 2008? 28.85
what was, then, the change over that period? 8.43
what was the price of shares in the end of 2008? 28.85
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 price? | 0.2922 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands): years ending december 31:.
2011 | $62465
2012 | 54236
2013 | 47860
2014 | 37660
2015 | 28622
thereafter | 79800
future minimum lease payments | $310643
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $66.9 million, $57.2 million and $49.0 million during the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses, we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses, some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions, for the lease of certain properties used in our operations. typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years, with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods. we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property. lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $1.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases. the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost. in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold, we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall. similarly, if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold, we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value. had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31, 2010, the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $31.4 million. we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value. litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008, ford global technologies, llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s. infringed on ford design patents. the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011. pursuant to the settlement, we (and our designees) became the sole distributor in the u.s. of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s. design patent. we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell. the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation, claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business. we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows..
between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the change in the rental expense? | 8.2 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | 62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27, 2012, totaled $73.6 million after tax. these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions. unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27, 2012, were $1.7 million after-tax. the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27, 2012, that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $14.0 million of expense. credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies. if our debt were to fall below investment grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions. the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27, 2012, was $19.9 million. we have posted col- lateral of $4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts. if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27, 2012, we would have been required to post an additional $15.6 million of collateral to counterparties. concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012, wal-mart stores, inc. and its affili- ates (wal-mart) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s. retail segment. no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales. wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment. as of may 27, 2012, wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s. retail receivables, 5 percent of our international receiv- ables, and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables. the five largest customers in our u.s. retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales, the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales, and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales. we enter into interest rate, foreign exchange, and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives, primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties. we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties; however, we have not incurred a material loss. we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges. the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties, should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts, is $19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral. under the terms of master swap agreements, some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk. collateral assets are either cash or u.s. treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults. note 8. debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows:.
in millions | may 27 2012 notes payable | may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate | may 27 2012 notespayable | weighted-averageinterest rate
u.s. commercial paper | $412.0 | 0.2% (0.2%) | $192.5 | 0.2% (0.2%)
financial institutions | 114.5 | 10.0 | 118.8 | 11.5
total | $526.5 | 2.4% (2.4%) | $311.3 | 4.5% (4.5%)
to ensure availability of funds, we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings. commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing. we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe. in april 2012, we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines, consisting of a $1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $1.7 billion facility.
for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions? 12.636
and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s. commercial paper? 412.0
what was the full total of notes payable? 526.5
how much, then, in relation to this total did that amount represent? | 0.78253 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls, crude oil and natural gas at december 31, 2008, excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions. oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil. oneok partners estimates the following: 2022 a $0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $1.2 million; 2022 a $1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $1.0 million; and 2022 a $0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $0.6 million. the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by, or arise in conjunction with, price changes. for example, a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream, impacting gathering and processing margins, ngl exchange revenues, natural gas deliveries, and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated. oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage, the relative values of the various ngl products to each other, the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location, known as basis risk. oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations. oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities. in addition, oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided. when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers, the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas, or store or use natural gas from inventory, which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk. at december 31, 2008, there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business. distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas. gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in, and recoverable through, the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism. energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk, basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage, requirement contracts, asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations. we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments, which, under certain circumstances, are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges. we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas, which we hedge with derivative instruments. both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value. fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities, excluding $21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges..
- | (thousands of dollars)
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007 | $25171
derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period | -55874 (55874)
fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period | 236772
other changes in fair value | 52731
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 (a) | $258800
(a) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h, which is consistent with our business s trategy. the maturities are as fol lows: $225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009, $33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $(0.1) mil lion matures through march 2014. fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es.
what was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding between 2007 and 2008? | 233629.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31:.
(in millions) | 2009 | 2008
fair value | $72699 | $54163
amortized cost | 74843 | 60786
net unrealized loss pre-tax | $-2144 (2144) | $-6623 (6623)
net unrealized loss after-tax | $-1316 (1316) | $-4057 (4057)
the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31, 2009 and december 31, 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $1.01 billion, or $635 million after-tax, and $2.27 billion, or $1.39 billion after- tax, respectively, related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity. these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income. the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities. we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists. to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified, the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component. the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income, and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security (see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8). the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors, which are more fully described in note 3. such factors are based upon estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations, other-than-temporary impairment could increase, in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income. national housing prices, according to the case-shiller national hpi, have declined to date approximately 30% (30%) peak-to-current. management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010, consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% (37%). as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment, if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% (110%) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% (90%) of management 2019s current expectations, credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $120 million to $125 million, which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income. excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities. additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8..
what is the net change of securities between 2008 and 2009? 18536.0
what is the fair value of securities in 2008? | 54163.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007. the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007. these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items, which did not affect opening retained earnings: 2022 certain credit products; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments; 2022 certain structured liabilities; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses. none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company, including where those management objectives would not be met. the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:.
in millions of dollars | 2008 trading assets | 2008 loans | 2008 trading assets | loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet | $16254 | $2315 | $26020 | $3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value | $6501 | $3 | $899 | $-5 (5)
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | $77 | $1113 | $186 | $1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue | $190 | $-4 (4) | $68 | $2014
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $16254 $2315 $26020 $3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $6501 $3 $899 $(5) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $77 $1113 $186 $1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $190 $(4) $68 $2014 in addition to the amounts reported above, $72 million and $141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007, respectively. changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications. the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31, 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $38 million and $188 million, respectively. certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies, which are reported at fair value. the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. as required by sfas 159, all investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet. citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method. the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting. thus, this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings. these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet. changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks (201cstructured liabilities 201d). the company elected the fair- value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. these positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (trading account liabilities) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form. for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $277 million as of december 31, 2008 and $7 million as of december 31, 2007. the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement. certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates (201cnon-structured liabilities 201d)..
what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008? | 16254.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | at december 31, 2012, total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows:.
in millions | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | thereafter
lease obligations | $198 | $136 | $106 | $70 | $50 | $141
purchase obligations (a) | 3213 | 828 | 722 | 620 | 808 | 2654
total | $3411 | $964 | $828 | $690 | $858 | $2795
(a) includes $3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard, packaging and recycling business. rent expense was $231 million, $205 million and $210 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. guarantees in connection with sales of businesses, property, equipment, forestlands and other assets, interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets, and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities, breaches of representations and warranties, and other matters. where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation, accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction. environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws, includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act (cercla). many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources. while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws, as a practical matter, liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties. remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable. international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $92 million in the aggregate at december 31, 2012. one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake, minneso- ta. during 2009, in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla, international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study. in june 2011, the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $46 million. the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy. in october 2011, the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed. in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative, the remediation costs could be material, and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded. in october 2012, the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment. it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss, if any, which may be incurred. in addition to the above matters, other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current, closed or formerly-owned facilities, and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet, totaled approximately $46 million at december 31, 2012. other than as described above, completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper, inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site (kalamazoo river superfund site) in michigan. the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river, including a paper mill formerly owned by st. regis. the company is a successor in interest to st. regis. international paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability, if any, with respect to the site. accordingly, it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site. also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site, the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp, fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site. the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint, and for future remediation costs. the suit alleges that a mill, during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st. regis, discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling. also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company. in mid-2011, the suit was.
between the years of 2011 and 2012, what was the change in rent expenses? 26.0
and what was this change between 2010 and 2011? | -5.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock, assuming dividend reinvestment, compared with the cumulative total return, assuming dividend reinvestment, of the standard & poor ("s&p") 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31, 2009 through december 31, 2014..
- | 12/09 | 12/10 | 12/11 | 12/12 | 12/13 | 12/14
e*trade financial corporation | 100.00 | 90.91 | 45.23 | 50.85 | 111.59 | 137.81
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 115.06 | 117.49 | 136.30 | 180.44 | 205.14
dow jones us financials index | 100.00 | 112.72 | 98.24 | 124.62 | 167.26 | 191.67
table of contents.
what is the price of e*trade financial corporation in 2014 less an initial 100? 37.81
what is that divided by 100? 0.3781
what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2014 less and initial 100? 105.14
what is that divided by 100? 1.0514
what is the difference of the e*trade percent change and the s&p percent change? | -0.6733 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | entergy texas, inc. management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas, substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs. other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds. the recovery became effective july 2007. see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds. 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006. amount (in millions).
- | amount (in millions)
2006 net revenue | $403.3
purchased power capacity | 13.1
securitization transition charge | 9.9
volume/weather | 9.7
transmission revenue | 6.1
base revenue | 2.6
other | -2.4 (2.4)
2007 net revenue | $442.3
the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana. the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds. as discussed above, in june 2007, egsrf i, a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas, issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property, which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds. see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance. the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales, including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period. retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors. see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006. the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006. refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase. gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds. the decrease was partially offset by the $39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $44 million in wholesale revenues, including $30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas. the receipt of such payments is being.
what was the change in net revenue for entergy texas in 2007? 39.0
and the growth rate during this time? | 0.0967 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts (trust preferred securities), which qualify as tier 1 capital, were $23.899 billion at december 31, 2008, as compared to $23.594 billion at december 31, 2007. in 2008, citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities. the frb issued a final rule, with an effective date of april 11, 2005, which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies, but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards. under the rule, after a five-year transition period, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations, such as citigroup, would be limited to 15% (15%) of total core capital elements, net of goodwill, less any associated deferred tax liability. the amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. at december 31, 2008, citigroup had approximately 11.8% (11.8%) against the limit. the company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31, 2009. the frb permits additional securities, such as the equity units sold to adia, to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% (25%) (including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% (15%) limit) of total core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. at december 31, 2008, citigroup had approximately 16.1% (16.1%) against the limit. the frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007. the frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to, and issue interpretations of, risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions. these may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets. capital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines. to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% (6%), a total capital (tier 1 + tier 2 capital) ratio of at least 10% (10%) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% (5%), and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels. at december 31, 2008, all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions, including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution, citibank, n.a., as noted in the following table: citibank, n.a. components of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007.
in billions of dollars at year end | 2008 | 2007
tier 1 capital | $71.0 | $82.0
total capital (tier 1 and tier 2) | 108.4 | 121.6
tier 1 capital ratio | 9.94% (9.94%) | 8.98% (8.98%)
total capital ratio (tier 1 and tier 2) | 15.18 | 13.33
leverage ratio (1) | 5.82 | 6.65
leverage ratio (1) 5.82 6.65 (1) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets. citibank, n.a. had a net loss for 2008 amounting to $6.2 billion. during 2008, citibank, n.a. received contributions from its parent company of $6.1 billion. citibank, n.a. did not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008. total subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc. that were outstanding at december 31, 2008 and december 31, 2007 and included in citibank, n.a. 2019s tier 2 capital, amounted to $28.2 billion. citibank, n.a. received an additional $14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009. the impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above. the substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup, and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios, 201d also affected, or could affect, citibank, n.a..
what is the total capital in 2008 less tier 1 capital? 37.4
what is total capital from 2007? 121.6
what is tier 1 capital in 2007? 82.0
what is the difference of total capital and tier 1 in 2007? 39.6
what is the ratio of the differences in capital from 2008 to 2007? | 0.94444 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 (continued) (amounts in millions, except per share amounts) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity, capital resources and uses of capital..
cash flow data | years ended december 31, 2015 | years ended december 31, 2014 | years ended december 31, 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $848.2 | $831.2 | $598.4
net cash used in working capital2 | -117.5 (117.5) | -131.1 (131.1) | -9.6 (9.6)
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -56.7 (56.7) | -30.6 (30.6) | 4.1
net cash provided by operating activities | $674.0 | $669.5 | $592.9
net cash used in investing activities | -202.8 (202.8) | -200.8 (200.8) | -224.5 (224.5)
net cash used in financing activities | -472.8 (472.8) | -343.9 (343.9) | -1212.3 (1212.3)
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets, amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation, non-cash (gain) loss related to early extinguishment of debt, losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes. 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $674.0, which was an improvement of $4.5 as compared to 2014, primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $13.6. due to the seasonality of our business, we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year, with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters. our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses. net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $669.5, which was an improvement of $76.6 as compared to 2013, primarily as a result of an increase in net income, offset by an increase in working capital usage of $121.5. our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses. the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow. in most of our businesses, our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients. to the extent possible, we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients. the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements, while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers. our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments. for example, while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year, they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year. investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $161.1, largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware. net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions. capital expenditures of $148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements. we made payments of $67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014, net of cash acquired..
what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015? 848.2
what is the 2014 value? 831.2
what is the net change? | 17.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | part ii. item 5. market for registrant 2019s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns. as of february 2, 2019, we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock. stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index, the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index. the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28, 2013 (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29, 2018 and, for each index, on the last day of the calendar year. comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems, inc., the nasdaq composite index, the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. fiscal year ending december 29. copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s, a division of s&p global. all rights reserved. nasdaq compositecadence design systems, inc. s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology.
- | 12/28/2013 | 1/3/2015 | 1/2/2016 | 12/31/2016 | 12/30/2017 | 12/29/2018
cadence design systems inc. | $100.00 | $135.18 | $149.39 | $181.05 | $300.22 | $311.13
nasdaq composite | 100.00 | 112.60 | 113.64 | 133.19 | 172.11 | 165.84
s&p 500 | 100.00 | 110.28 | 109.54 | 129.05 | 157.22 | 150.33
s&p 500 information technology | 100.00 | 115.49 | 121.08 | 144.85 | 201.10 | 200.52
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance..
what was the net change in value of the nasdaq from 2017 to 2018? | -6.27 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies. the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $48 million at december 31, 2011. aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding. some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $64 million at december 31, 2011. during 2011, the company funded $15 million of these commitments. aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate, additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time. 17. related party transactions during 2011, the company, in the ordinary course of business, provided retail brokerage, consulting and financial advisory services to, and received wholesale brokerage services from, an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders. these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions. during 2011, commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $9 million. 18. segment information the company has two reportable operating segments: risk solutions and hr solutions. unallocated income and expenses, when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses, total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements. reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker (2018 2018codm 2019 2019) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices. the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm. risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker, helping clients manage their risks, via consultation, as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network. hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits, talent and related financial challenges, and improve business performance by designing, implementing, communicating and administering a wide range of human capital, retirement, investment management, health care, compensation and talent management strategies. aon 2019s total revenue is as follows (in millions):.
years ended december 31 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
risk solutions | $6817 | $6423 | $6305
hr solutions | 4501 | 2111 | 1267
intersegment elimination | -31 (31) | -22 (22) | -26 (26)
total operating segments | 11287 | 8512 | 7546
unallocated | 2014 | 2014 | 49
total revenue | $11287 | $8512 | $7595
.
what was the total revenue in 2011? 11287.0
and what was it in 2010? 8512.0
how much, then, does the 2011 total revenue represent in relation to the 2010 one? 1.32601
and what is the difference between this value and the number one? | 0.32601 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | republic services, inc. notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31:.
- | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
balance at beginning of year | $70.1 | $72.0 | $84.7
additions based on tax positions related to current year | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.3
additions for tax positions of prior years | 1.4 | 5.0 | 11.4
reductions for tax positions of prior years | -10.2 (10.2) | -6.0 (6.0) | -2.4 (2.4)
reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations | -0.6 (0.6) | -0.2 (0.2) | -1.3 (1.3)
settlements | -13.9 (13.9) | -1.5 (1.5) | -20.7 (20.7)
balance at end of year | $47.0 | $70.1 | $72.0
during 2015, we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $13.9 million. during 2014, we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $1.5 million. during 2013, we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years. the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $20.7 million. included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31, 2015 and 2014 are $30.5 million and $45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits (net of the federal benefit on state matters) that, if recognized, would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods. we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income. related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted, we recorded interest expense of approximately $1.2 million during 2015 and, in total as of december 31, 2015, have recognized a liability for penalties of $0.5 million and interest of $10.3 million. during 2014, we accrued interest of approximately $1.5 million and, in total as of december 31, 2014, had recognized a liability for penalties of $0.5 million and interest of $18.7 million. during 2013, we accrued interest of approximately $1.2 million and, in total as of december 31, 2013, had recognized a liability for penalties of $0.5 million and interest of $17.0 million. gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $0 to $10 million; however, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months. we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years. these state audits are ongoing. we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate. however, a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows..
what is the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2015? | 47.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | as of december 31, 2017, the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $20 million, which expire from 2018 through 2020. a deferred tax asset of approximately $16 million (net of federal benefit) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards, with a valuation allowance of $7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31, 2017. the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $39 million, which expires in 2027. a deferred tax asset of approximately $3 million (net of federal benefit) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward, with a full valuation allowance as of december 31, 2017. other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036. 14. debt long-term debt consisted of the following:.
($in millions) | december 31 2017 | december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% (5.000%) | 2014 | 600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% (5.000%) | 600 | 600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% (3.483%) | 600 | 2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% (7.81%) | 84 | 84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% (4.55%) | 21 | 21
less unamortized debt issuance costs | -26 (26) | -27 (27)
total long-term debt | 1279 | 1278
credit facility - in november 2017, the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement (the "credit facility") with third-party lenders. the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $1250 million, which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22, 2017. the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $500 million. the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ("libor") plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating, which may vary between 1.125% (1.125%) and 1.500% (1.500%). the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio. the commitment fee rate as of december 31, 2017 was 0.25% (0.25%) and may vary between 0.20% (0.20%) and 0.30% (0.30%). the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio. each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries, are and will be guarantors under the credit facility. in july 2015, the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility, including $345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans. as of december 31, 2017, $15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn, and the remaining $1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized. the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $11 million and $8 million as of december 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. senior notes - in december 2017, the company issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% (3.483%) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027, the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% (5.000%) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below. in november 2015, the company issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% (5.000%) senior notes due november 2025, the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% (7.125%) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below. interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually. the terms of the 5.000% (5.000%) and 3.483% (3.483%) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, sell assets, and effect consolidations or mergers. the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $15 million and $19 million as of december 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively..
what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes from 2016 to 2017? -4.0
and how much does this change represent in relation to those costs in 2016, in percentage? | -0.21053 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 (continued) in connection with these discover related purchases, we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos. contractual rights sold totaled $7.6 million during the year ended may 31, 2008 and $1.0 million during fiscal 2009. such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months. during fiscal 2009, we collected $4.4 million of such proceeds, which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows. we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale. proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense. during fiscal 2009, we recognized $1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities. other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008, we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer, s.a. and euroenvios conecta, s.l., which we collectively refer to as lfs spain. lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america. the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations. during fiscal 2008, we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states. the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering. the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions (in thousands):.
- | total
goodwill | $13536
customer-related intangible assets | 4091
contract-based intangible assets | 1031
property and equipment | 267
other current assets | 502
total assets acquired | 19427
current liabilities | -2347 (2347)
minority interest in equity of subsidiary (at historical cost) | -486 (486)
net assets acquired | $16594
the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years. the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years. these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly, we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions. in addition, during fiscal 2008, we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $1.7 million. the value assigned to the customer list of $0.1 million was expensed immediately. the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years. fiscal 2007 on july 24, 2006, we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited, or hsbc asia pacific. this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region. the.
what is the sum of goodwill and customer related intangible assets? 17627.0
what is the sum including contract based intangible assets? 18658.0
what is the value of total assets acquired? | 19427.0 |
As a helpful financial assistant, your expertise is required for the following tasks: 'ConvFinQA', 'FiQA_SA', 'FPB', 'Headline', and 'NER'. Please provide answers honestly and succinctly. | shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing. the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock, the s&p 500 index, and the dow jones transportation average. the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment, which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods, assumes that $100 was invested on december 31, 2001 in the s&p 500 index, the dow jones transportation average, and the class b common stock of united parcel service, inc. comparison of five year cumulative total return $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 $180.00 $200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport.
- | 12/31/01 | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06
united parcel service inc. | $100.00 | $117.19 | $140.49 | $163.54 | $146.35 | $148.92
s&p 500 index | $100.00 | $77.90 | $100.24 | $111.15 | $116.61 | $135.02
dow jones transportation average | $100.00 | $88.52 | $116.70 | $149.06 | $166.42 | $182.76
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31, 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance. these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock..
what is the price of united parcel service stock in 2006 less 100? 48.92
what is the net change of the dow jones transportation average in 2006 less 100? 82.76
what is the difference between the two? | -33.84 |