Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

" POV and malicious editing I've tried to address some POV issues, but RafaelGarcia keeps reverting. The statement: ""However, some of Rehnquist's victories in this federalist goal of scaling back congressional power over the states had little practical impact."" is POV even sourced to Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court.2007. Penguin Books. Page 29. Opinion doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. I guess he's just a law student so he has a lot to learn. ( )"

note this may be Olahus evading his block, it wouldn't be the first time)

RE: Pulp Fiction You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Remember that as per WP:CCC no consensus is permanent. I have proposed a change as per WP:BOLD, and see no protest from any users other than yourself. If you would like to discuss a potential compromise to reach a new consensus I would be more than open to that, but simply dismissing my change without any form of discourse goes against the nature of WP. T / C

A message about Schizotypal personality disorder.

(UTC) I think the article could be good, but unfortunately it is impossible to make comments contrary to an agenda of those who are seeking special recognitition for the locaal regional variations of South Uist dialect in the very area of Cape Breton where the CnG is located. 14:37, 25 March 2010

" Problem is his alternative is just removing it. Regardless, Barack Obama is a featured article using more than one campaign logo in exactly this way, and if this isn't fair use then shouldn't exist. Hope to see ya back in action soon! talkcontribs "

to him smiling (even though the guy hardly smiles)

Ummmmmm.... Listen. People have been attacked by chimps many times. And i'm pretty sure the lady who saw her friend get torn apart won't forget it!!! 173.51.203.228

Why Don't They Delete This I so agree with you guys. All my teachers tell me not to use wikipedia.

You are right, and that is hard when you are writing an article for a celebrity, wouldent you agree?

Get the name right It's not CCRC== Why did you undo the fix I made to correct the name. The legal name is what I stated. Why did you change it back to the wrong name? The llegal name is the english and french with a - between them. ==

"you can find more info on this at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nietzsche_Music_Project supposedly he felt that his composition ""Hymn to life"" should be listened to in order to properly interpret his work. but I haven't heard it and feel like ive done a good job grasping his ideas.. "

" Let me also add that I understand how frustrating it is to be up against a banned editor, who has no qualms about gaming the system to get what they want. I have no time for that editor, and will gladly help to WP:RBI whenever I spot his edits. But its important to separate the issue from the person. The fact is, it is not only that banned editor who supports the piped solution. Therefore you going around changing it on an article-by-article basis is no different from what he did - you are forcing your interpretation on the article. This issue is going to rumble on, and editors who are willing to edit war to push their own interpretations will end up restricted. Trust me, I've been around for long enough, and have seen it time and again. And the patience of the admin community is tiring on this subject. The only way this will be resolved peacefully and with any permanence is to come up with some sort of consensus that can then be applied consistently. If you care about this issue, then please engage in that discussion. Thanks. et As above, the ""piped solution"" doesn't apply in the article under discussion. Second, I will continue to revert edits made by banned socks. Third, I will continue to engage in discussion with legitimate editors, as I always do. Less of your high-and-mighty tone, please. "

" About Corticopia Corticopia's past Hello: I just want to share with you some information you might consider important. We had a very difficult time months ago removing Mexico from Central America in the article North America. Why? Because an ""anonimous"" user (IP from Toronto Canada) was reverting all the changes. I finally discovered he was an already registered user and got him blocked because of sockpuppetry. One month later, I found out he was already been accused of sockpuppetry with that account. Well my point is that he is against of Mexico being included in North America. His main ""argument"" was that the UN geosheme includes Mexico in CA and that's it. He also denies that North America is also a subregion of America and ignores the cited content proving him wrong. Well, he is Corticopia. For months he was retired and trust me, NO BODY changed the articles North America and Central America (specially this one) to say Mexico was in CA. Suddenly a ""new"" user shows up. He deleted a line in the article CA. It said ""Mexico is rarely, yet sometimes included in Central America under certain definitions"". This line was discussed and agreed. He changed it to ""Mexico is included in Central America"" then to ""Mexico is sometimes included in Central America"". I don't know what his problem is. The important thing is I totally felt this is the same person we had a very serious vandalism problems months ago, so I checked his edit list. Wow! What a discovery, his first edit was the article Issac Asimov and articles about Canada and some other regions of the world. It was very obvious it was the same person. Please check this sources and this . Please, read them carefully. Please check the contributions of each accused sockpuppetry account, specially the one of User:Ex post factoid. It is very obvious he is the same person. He was dragged into the article Mexico when he was unable to ""win"" again in the article Central America (he didn't even try to change the article North America because he knows a lot of people guard that article). So his reason to say Mexico is in ""Southern North America"" are purely false and

personal. He wants to ""exclude"" Mexico or make it ""look"" appart from Canda and the USA. I'm telling you this because I think you don't realize his reasons are just personal, a personal aversion against Mexico being included in North America. If he's so interested in accuracy of the articles, why isn't he editing the article USA? He even asked Supaman to do it by himself. He's just there to exclude Mexico. Please read carefully the evidence provided in each sockpuppetry case. You said that you're an administrator in Spanish Wikipedia, so I think you're experienced in these cases. You will find it is the same person. Cortiopia has edited the same pattern of articles that the other accounts did. Too bad I warned him and I'm sure he stopped editing with that account to prevent being identified. I think we should stop him and prevent him from editing the article with his biased, excluding information, even if sourced, because his reasons are just personal and not for the sake of accuracy. ( Let's talk! ) "

" MSI Wind PC A proposed deletion template has been added to the article MSI Wind PC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of MSI Wind PC. // (complaints)•(contribs) "

Vandalism Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Yes I am sure it was compromised. But i have now managed to recleim it

There is also an University of arts - http://www.arts.bg.ac.yu/

You fag YOu faggot how come you delete cool stuff like Eric Beatty go screw yourself you stuck up douche bag

All those stupid little blocks will not stop me, I am very patient, I will keep coming back over and over again.

" I closed it based on the AFD text above the section break. The bottom section didn't attempt to notify the people who had already discussed the debate. If you feel I was in error, please use WP:DRV. "

" TFD and Andy, the arguments in your last post are invalid. Sourcing coverage requirements are for presence of material in the article, and for the existence of an article (which gun control certainly fulfills and ""gun politics"" might fulfill) not for the comparison of the two words, and not for talk page discussions outside of the above two. Lot's of people try to do the two step process and say that it applies to all talk page discussions (which is wrong) and also try to create a situation of ""my unsourced opinion wins unless you meet the very high bar of finding a wp:rs that addresses and refutes my unsourced opinion"" Which is what both of you are trying to do here with your assertion that the two terms are synonymous. So such is invalid on several levels. Sincerely, North8000 "

" 78th Academy Awards Please stop using edit summaries that give away the winners. [[WP:EA|E]] (T+C) at 03:48 UTC (2006-03-06) Everyone is watching, it's not a spoiler. Oh well, if it's annoying, fine. , Monday March 6 2006 at 03:51 Remember that the show goes around-the-world, and there is tape delay in some countries. [[WP:EA|E]] (T+C) at 03:52 UTC (2006-03-06)"

Extended comments about this The comments by BritishWatcher show the problems at present. I gave him a simple choice, assume good faith and take me at my word, or buy the book. Instead he chose option C, whine and assume bad faith. He asserts I have not provided an alternate text written from the source instead of the current text. If he had bothered to read the discussion, he would realise I have said more than once that it is not possible to construct an accurate, non-misleading sentence that belongs in the lead of the article from that source. So I cannot do that. The problems are quite simple: The original sentence which was copied to the lead (complete with egregious modifications of the original sentence to mean something completely different!) did not match the source, and is therefore unsourced. It is impossible to construct an accurate, non-misleading sentence that belongs in the lead of the article from that source. Various editors have produced no sources at all to support any figures about injuries or opinions they have said should be included in the lead. Various editors refuse to allow an unsourced (as the text does not match the source in any way) sentence to be removed from the article. They are so insistent on retaining an incorrect, unsourced sentence. Not only that, they keep proposing equally incorrect, unsourced sentences that either cite zero sources or inaccurately cite the existing source. I have asked many times why the reader should be misled. It is quite telling that nobody dare give me a straight policy based answer to that question, especially when the protection policy allows for its removal. When one side's discussion involves nothing more than assumptions of bad faith, stalling, stonewalling and making things up from thin air, it is obvious where the problem lies.

Just a friendly suggestion I noticed you struggling as a new user to fit into the Wikipedia. I personally feel that Wikipedia can only work properly when people with a diverse array of opinions can come together to write about subjects in a NPOV manner. In any case, I hope this page is helpful to you in regards to the editing of the article about yourself Wikipedia:Autobiography. I hope you decide to stick around and learn how to work on Wikipedia with in its guidelines.

http://www.everytopicintheuniverseexceptchickens.com/ !!!!

And Im not going to go through my personal explanations of how Persians took Armenian words, rather than the other way around.

The Shameless I didn't add incorrect information to the article. I added another reference, which is an interview about the movie with lead actress Jeon Do-yeon. 203.215.116.169

refimprove When I clean up a Notable people list page, I leave that header on if there are notable people needing verification that they have a notable connection to the town. With the List of people from Oak Park, Illinois there are well over 20 people that I could not verify their connection to the town from their biography page. I see that refimprove header as an encouragement to remedy this.

Didn't realize that was a problem; I'll check Complete Peerage and edit accordingly. PMAnderson

Plank Why don't you have an article on Plank from EEnE? It's just not fair! AND IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN ARTICLE ON PLANK BY JULY 24TH, I AM GOING TO KILL THE FOUNDER OF WIKIPEDIA.COM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

" ""The Big Show"" IS the correct answer! And it was performed by Chapman & Baker. I had an audio only copy of the sketch , but not the full show ... Bob Hope could've been hosting , but had nothing to do with the sketch. ( A further version of the sketch exists performed by John Cleese & Connie Booth on the album ""The Mermaid Frolics"". ) "

" and dont forget a certain ""mr. c"" who was involved in sexual harrasment!"

" Got a source for that? Talk "

Seric you are a fanatic who serves Turkish interests. Ban me but you should always know you should feel guilty of what you love

To quote a part of your addition:It is si o4 silicon dioxide and water , water is an important part of opal as only in recent times it was discovered what makes the colour in precious opal , that islight passing thru microsopic voids between water molecules. Surely you can see the lazy typing errors in that. You slap something together and expect someone else to fix it for you? In addition, it is totally unreferenced, with just acouple of ext. links. One of those links is a gem dealer site, basic info, but not reliable as it is a commercial site. The Mindat link is OK, but only says that it is a variety of opal. A Google search returns lots ofcommercial sites hyping the stuff, but virtually no legitimate refs. Sorry 'bout that.

Oh hai there herp derp

NSA conspiracy theory Please contain all discussion of the dubious source/statements here.

Maria Kanellis Is the lovely diva, Maria Kanellis in the game???

Review of screening PMID 20889076 - discusses cost-effectiveness.  | T@lk

It has actually been a case on both Cold Case Sverige,Efterlyst and the trial got media attention. But as DGG sayd its not a speedy. have a nice evening!

" A pleasant surprise If you haven't checked the Paris Metro Infoboxes lately, then I think you are in for a pleasant surprise. See User_talk:Edokter#Infobox_Paris_metro_question too. Yours, ><>°° "

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Baker (disambiguation). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

Husky Stadium (University of Washington)|

dog meat I agree that such information would make for a better article, but I'm afraid I don't have access to that info presently. Perhaps most of the editors don't, either. I don't think it's POV to not add information you don't actually know. I might try to look up some info on cuts and such later, but I would encourage you to do so. Cheers,

"So, Hell, are you saying that it's okay for ""seb"" to laugh rudely at me and say, rudely sarcastically, ""It gets better every time"" (referring to something that I said to or/and about him in the admin. board), but it's somehow ""not okay"" for me to respond with a similar rudeness back? How is that ""fair""? Did you go to him with a similar kind of warning? If not, then why not? "

There is a thin line between information and advertising and I think most wiki editors will disallow your duck race. (Wikipedia works by consensus) What Pulborough does need is a decent digital photo or two of the village, if you have any suitable. The upload file button is used for this, followed by linking to the page using double square brackets. Adversane, Billingshurst and Storrington also need photos.

" Which just proves my point. Hasteur warned me to not call people ""deletionists"" (that's not a personal attack). As for other two warnings, they were about the same thing. I refrained from doing it afterwards. "

Hey please stop VANDALIZING stop it

" Hog-baiting involves a dog submitting, harming or killing a hog/pig/boar. If you want then we require a ""fork-article"". One for ""Hog-dog Rodeo"", which is only barking, no touching of the dog to the hog and one for ""Hog-baiting"". What do you fellows think? "

December 2006 (UTC) You are vandalising my user page with frivolous accusations. I have no respect for your contributions to this encyclopedia and I will not treat a grandstanding attitude with respect. My reasons for taking it down have already been noted at the page that I am accused of being a sockpuppet, ehinger2, and there is no reason to continue vandalising my user:Page with accusations. Let administrators do a checkuser, but stop vandalising the page. 05:46, 10

When did I chop things out of articles without good reason?

The link about Bunjevs above explains the whole situation. BUNJEVCI ARE NOT CROATS! Cheers!

Range Range with aerial refueling is irrelevant. Range with either 1) internal fuel load 2) common external fuel load are what should be stated in the specifications.

Please call me at 1-703-878-9390, my name is Bruce. I'd like you to show me where I'm advertising for them?

Don't forget I did not vandalize I added content you idiot and I will do it again and there's nothing you can do to stop me, you're hilarious acting like you have some type of authoriy hahaha RETARD!.

" Follow-up. You reduce ""false rape"" claims to people (women) changing their minds. But if rape is sex without consent, it does not require anyone changing his mind. It can be people feeling ambivalent or curious beforehand. Ambivalence or curiousity do not imply consent. Cooperation does not imply consent. And you cannot prove consent unless you have maybe signed a consent form, into which you could have been tricked / coerced to sign. Don't you see the huge plunge into plain old fashioned insanity the legal system takes when rape is sex without consent? I am aware that it is hard for women to get rape claims heard etc, I am aware of that. What I am trying to explain to you is this is exactly the result of exaggerated rape claims. If rape was just a special form of assault, there would not be little misunderstanding to what constitutes a rape and what not. This would serve the potential victims as well as everybody else, especially the legal system and the police. I am not familiar enough with the example of South Africa that you bring up. From experience, if a statisticly huge drop like 60% in a short time for something that is greatly influenced by social mores (which usually take ~50 to 150 years to change), then this is most likely caused by a change in the way the figures are obtained. You bring up the example of date rape not being covered by the definition of ""sex by force"". You have some pretty messed up ideas. Drugs are force. For example, the police tries to use knock-out gas to remedy certain hostile situations, and they refer to these gases as ""non-lethal force"". Similiar to another example, where people are ""just holding you down, not hurting you to rape you"" - holding someone down - by force - is force. Locking someone up in a basement, only to offer food and water in exchange for sexual service - is also using force (if you have thought about bringing that example up). The second half of your post mostly rambles about how expensive guns are. Yes, they are way too expensive, but the reason for them being expensive has a lot to do with government regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of firearms. As for an unsightly bul

ge when carrying a weapon - I've got some more unsightly bulges than that, and women tend carry purses perfect for concealed carry. So, women have an easier time to carry guns. God, I want it to be socially acceptable for men to carry a purse. But then again, it looks like total ass. Every civilized society requires all its citizens to be armed at all times. Because violence is the very foundation of a state - The state removes the right to be violent to each other from the people, and instead claims a monopoly on violence, and resolves disputes with a legal system, and enforces the laws with an armed police force. But when the state is the only one controlling violence in its controlled territory, nobody controls the state to prevent government abuse, totalitarian laws, dictatorships. Aside from discouraging small time petty criminals, an armed civil population has the benefit of being able to remove a government once it no longer serves its purpose - that is, the well-being of the citizens - and replace it with a new government, preferrably with the severed heads of the old goverment decorating the state capital just to remind the new goverment what happens when they step out of line. As such, any effort to outlaw an armed civil society must be punished harshly."

" Zu Yi Hi thanks for your contributions but could you please rewrite this so it isn't written like a poem? Cheers $1,000,000? "

" You've completely missed the point. The MSNBC article is a journalist's paraphrasing of the JAMA review. Given that we link to the JAMA review already, it's entirely redundnant. I've removed this bit: ""At this stage, researchers have concluded the fetus cannot feel pain because pain centers in the brain are not yet present,"" which cited the MSNBC article. In fact, the MSNBC article doesn't mention ""pain centers"", so the citation was inaccurate. Furthermore, the subsequent sentence in the article just said the same thing, only more accurately, so the sentence I removed wasn't required. "

":::::Okay, dug a little deeper, and I think I've figured out what happened, more or less: Fremantle forfeited their games against Centrals and Rovers in protest to what they called poor umpiring by a Mr. Croft in their previous game against Rovers, which caused them to drop to third on the ladder. The premiership came down to the last match between West Perth and Rovers (not really a grand final, as it was still part of the regular fixtures), which resulted in a draw, 4.10 (WP) to 4.7 (R) – I'm guessing behinds weren't counted at this stage. Also, I think this comment pretty much confirms it: ""Fremantle supporters will feel very sore at not having any interest in the final match for the premiership. Really they have themselves to blame for the school-boyish behavior they have shown in ignoring the Association."" Fremantle later challenged Rovers to a premiership decider under any umpire selected except Mr. Croft, which Rovers quite rightfully declined to take part in. Very interesting reading, and that's my historical research finished for the day ) A "

Oh, please. Indicating your sexual orientation to begin with is a creation of unnecesary drama.

Indu Just wondering, why did you move Indu to Http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Indu? It seems very strange. 4

" James_D_squier.jpg =I uploaded an image for a congressional candidate for district 22 in Texas named James D. Squier. You deleted it even though the licensing text field stated clearly that the image is a ""campaign photo released to the media by Judge Squier's ""Squier for Congress campaign"". Please excercise caution in the future before deleting anything or follow proceduce exactly according to Wiki policy. Frivilous misuse of Wiki administration policy can be grounds for removal from the system."

Wrong graph The contango and backwardation curves are switched!

" It's mainly a manual of style thing.  Boomer! "

" I honestly believe, and I've said this before, that there is a way of resolving this question. And the reason I believe it is because I believe that there has been a big misunderstanding about who Christopher Michael Langan is, and what he stands for. I would like to make two points. To be an advocate of something means to advocate for it. That is, it means to argue for it publicly. (One could be a private advocate around the dinner table, I suppose, but to argue this in an encyclopaedia would need very good evidence.) So, if somebody is an advocate, there should be clear evidence that he advocates the thing of which he is an advocate. Being an advocate means something different from, and something more than, being a member of an organisation. If it has been so difficult to find the clear evidence Langan advocates ID, that should give editors pause for thought, even those editors ill-disposed to the man. I believe the reason this evidence has been so difficult to locate is because Langan is not an advocate of ID. He is just not an advocatory kind of guy, if I may be permitted to put it like that. He is a very individual, probably very self-preoccupied sort of person. Contrary to how he has been presented, my impression is that he is anything but a self-promoter. He certainly is a guy who seems confident he is right about what he thinks, and would like people to listen to him. But that is not the same thing as being a self-promoter. More importantly, he comes across as somebody who is not at all interested in joining political movements, and is, in general, not a ""joiner"" of any kind. I truly believe that, as a guy totally outside academia, he was happy to receive the offer to speak at the ID conference, and could see grounds whereby what he had to say pertained to the interests of ID proponents. And the ID proponents, for their part, and as anti-ID people must surely recognise, are happy to accept into their fold anybody who seems like they could help the cause. So it was, if you like, a man and a movement taking mutual advantage of each other. Additionally, and as I have argued many times now, Langan

's CTMU is disqualified from being a species of ID theory, because it explicitly disavows scientific proof, the very opposite of ID theory, which constantly tries to claim scientific testability. Langan, I honestly believe, is just not the kind of guy he has been taken for by anti-ID editors. And that is probably why the evidence just does not seem to be there. "

wanna blank this cuz i'm liberal

Please refer to Wikipedia:Notability (people) so that you will be able to demonstrate the notability of the people you write about. If you do not demonstrate notability of the subject of an article, the article is likely to be deleted.

" ""Captain"" Sparrow vs ""Captain"" Barbosa All the way through the film Jack and Barbosa are trying to ""get one over"" on the other, to prove who should be the real Captain. I believe the article should mention someone about the rivalry and one-up-manship between the two. Jay316 "

A bot sounds like a great idea. Any bot writers out there? ·:· ·:·

" Okay, you are right Jeremy. I should not have done that. My sincere apologies! I thought too much about defending myself and my name and not about Wikipedia policy and the request to refrain from personal attacks. I was getting sick of all the personal attacks from Peter Lee all the time, where I never could say anything back. Now I got a little angry and wanted to say something back to him (actually lowering myself to his level), should have thought this over... I don't like it, but this time I deserved this block. After that, I will refrain from talking with Peter Lee at all (unless he is willing to discuss the 'hot' issues about Genseiryu and WGKF, which I doubt!) and will be very summier in the summaries. I learned my lesson! BTW, thanks for restoring the articles everytime. The blocks on the IP addresses don't work however, since he uses a dynamic ip... What can be done about that? "

" Fair use rationale for File:Sky tigers.JPG Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sky tigers.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""File"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. '''''' (TALK) "

Lundse has been passing off opinion for knowledge. Why should he stop now? It's types like him that makes it easy for me to pick up chicks at parties. The Lundses of the world inadvertantly enhance my social life. You to should employ a little psychological jujitsu with the Lundses of the world to improve your love life.

As an example I have added the source for Millom - see this edit.

Probably when you are asleep! but If I find will do! SatuSuro

" Regenerated electricity goes to fans etc (a few kilowatts or more usually) - no battery storage as in ""Green Goat"" in this one as yet.. Otherwise I agree - more marketting gas that real benefit.83.100.251.196 "

Minor edits reminder Thanks for your edit to Willamette University. However: Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks!

" Fair use rationale for Image:Mca2.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mca2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "

" No, K-Dee did not found that group. I removed that information. It's a zero! "

this book is so boring nad dumb how could any one ever read itIn

Help with Veronica Mars, please Having battled on and off with you over spoilers in various articles related to The Amazing Race, I'd like to enlist your help with similar issues in Veronica Mars. People are continually taking spoilers out of it to be newbie-friendly, or for whatever reason, but that's not how it should be done. You get your point across much better than I do, you've had to argue a similar point before, and you're a VM fan, so I think you can sort it out better than I can. Leave me a message either way.

what the fuck u doing? i just edited all those pages

I see nothing to keep from the list above. If you all disagree, post the name(s) of who is Wiki worthy to discuss this. All I read on these is a used car salemen maming a pitch. I recommend AfD for the list directly above.

"::Is this guy | Talk "

This person has vanadalized a page about Joe Leiberman

" "" but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions."" Honestly, that's what I call a cool story bro. Such a riveting tale, I honestly copy and pasted it to word, saved on my hard drive, backed it up on a jump drive, drove to the bank, put the jump drive in the safe deposit box, and will leave it there until my kids turn about 12 (when they can actually state their age, and ask what it is I'm showing them), when I will pick it up, put it in an old USB drive reader and relay this cool story to them and tell them, ""kids, this is what a cool story should look and sound like...not like the stories your generation tells. Don't unedit my wikipedia entries ever the fuk again bro, and by bro i mean never my bro, fuking phaggot."

" Well, one could be conservative and say that it is misleading; but if it is misleading, it is inherently false (my logic being that if it is only ""half-true"", it is essentially not true, i.e. false). We cannot make such general statements about anarcho-capitalism in this case; we must clarify what Rothbard means when he says ""he has the right to own the product that he has made."" Socialists believe, unconditionally, in ""the individual's right to possess what he or she produced."" Anarcho-capitalists, on the other hand, believe in the individual's right to possess what he or she produced (not merely obtained, such as through trade), if the product was made using previously unowned natural resources. And to address your point, Vision Thing, trade does not necessarily imply a contractual division of labour, for trade is possible in economic systems such as mutualism, which do not recognize a division of labour. Even if your statement were true, Vision Thing, we shouldn't be confusing or misleading readers with vague implications and paradoxes. "

" Ah, so you admit your violation to WP:OWN. And Bunchofgrapes little biased ""support"" (based on... well, we all know what) is simply amusing. But... then, seeing how you expect to be treated like a queen and that whatever you say goes: no. This is not your article. You do not have the rights to decide what is ""trolling"" and all of this bullsh*t. Learn your lesson, wise up, and start respecting the decisions of others. You are not the only person in this world, and you are also not anybody such as Queen Elizabeth, who would certainly rid of your rudeness without argument. I have no interest in enhancing this article any further. Let it weep all that it wants. And enough of the email-is-perfect-let's-sock conversations. I am done with you, I am done with you, I am done with you. This is history. Thank God. — | talk "

Kuchipudi From Andhra Pradesh Bhaamakalapam – in which Krishna brings flower for Satyabhama Initially only men performed this later women also started Tarangam – solo dancing Now has two dance styles: One completed dance drama style And other solo dancing Features – dancing on brass rims and keeping a water filled pot on head Acrobatic moves

Why did you remove musical artist discography, not images? Though most of musical artists CD, DVD images are permitted, why are B'z, Jun Shibata album covers removed? X Japan (see X Japan discography), Glay (see Glay discography) and Dir en grey (see Dir en grey discography) etc album covers are not removed. Why are they no problems? Fuck you!!

Thanks, and I apologize for my comment. I'd like you to know that I understand your position. 16:33, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

, called me a Jihadist and Mujaheddin (and not in the positive pro-Islam way)

I REPRESTNE A DRIECT THREATH TO THIS STIE YOU BUTTFACE AS SOON AS ICAN I'M GONANE DELETE EVETEYHTHING YOU BUTTAFCEAS HAVFE CREATED BECAUSE ITS STUPIDSGET A JOB ZT AT WEBSTERS YOU BUUTAFA ACAEFACE

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Yes - it's Sean Parker-Perry, Longdendale Councillor. He's always at itm and also goes under the username 'Yellowfrogs'.

" ==Guys..."" Don't you get it? This is a school system. We all have the same IP address. We have a primary, intremediate, middle, and high school. There would be a lot of people who would vandalise Wikipedia. "

Well, I just use it as appearence in original page.