text
stringlengths 1.49k
1.79k
| label_text
stringclasses 8
values |
|---|---|
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: as a federal leo , the very idea of confiscating guns is laughable . i swore an oath to the constitution , not to beto or any other politician .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: we must ban this horrible weapon of war
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: you 're pretty stupid to not just have armed security like me you filthy peasants .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: meanwhile in england , an old man is being charged with murder after he killed one of the men breaking into his home
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun non-Polarized </s> | Anti Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: thanks but no thanks .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i ’ d go for that . who do i send my wish list to ?
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: you be careful with that free speech there citizen , we do n't want dangerous things like that falling into the hands of children .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i 'll do you one better : disband the atf
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: its not just harry potter . its the handmaids tale ... its anything fictional where they draw a parallel , never from reality .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: welcome to 2019 , where believing in the bill of rights makes you an extremist .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun Non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: there are only two things wrong with those pictures : 1. berets . bwahahahhaa . berets . sigh . 2. potentially questionable trigger discipline , though it is a little hard to see . otherwise , are we supposed to be upset by this or something ?
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: women are funny , get over it nerd
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: so because guns are dangerous , we are going to tax the ability of people to practice with them . common sense gun control , right there .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: my kink
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i hate asset forfeiture , the most they should do is say you are n't allowed to carry it around in public . what you do with guns in your own property , as long as you are n't hurting anyone , is your own business .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: so i did some digging , and i believe i may be on to this “ loophole ” . fair warning- this is still pretty sketch , i definitely wouldn ’ t trust it with all my purchases [ URL ] ( URL )
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: yea , insult my character , that will make me do what you want ...
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: dank memes actually makes fun of leftist regularly
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: try /v/gundeals , thats where they went for now .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: this but unironically .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: > it 's an easy win for a lawsuit *sees that this is in nj* > abandon hope all ye who enter there
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: why were the authorities negotiating with terrorists ?
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: somebody made a good point somewhere on the net . he said he served in afghanistan in 16-17 and pointed out that we invaded in 2001. he said the entire us mil has been fighting guys in flip flops who were using 50 year old aks for twenty years .
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: brits have executed innocent civilians on 5 of the 7 continents . they 're the entire reason we adopted the 2nd amendment in the first place !
User label: [/INST] Support Gun non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: fuck joe biden
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: extension 2
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: cant go to court against a dead man
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: > shotgun bullet ಠ_ಠ
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: snapchat “ stories ” like that are absolute cancer . i can ’ t believe some of the headlines that come up on there . and to think that people actually thrive on that shit . damn
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: this is the kind of thing my mom says after reading facebook all day .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: clearfield wealth management should only care about my common and preferred stock , not my polymer and wood stocks .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: the best way to be killed by an authoritarian government is with a gun in your hand and a bullet in you . the worst way is giving up your guns and go on all fours when they tell you to so it ’ s easy for them to fuck you over and shoot you in the head .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: govt should have no right to judge if the purchase of a firearm is `` suspicious '' , let alone any fucking bank .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: funnily enough , a democrat signed the executive order which put japanese-americans in `` internment '' camps ( even those born in the us ) .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: > at the end of the period of public input , students with a group called the baltimore algebra project formed a phalanx with their backs to the board members . > > “ no guns in schools ” they said in unison . “ we gon na fight for our lives. ” what fools .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: jesus fucking christ . crop your meme
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: why would anyone need a shotgun that can be reloaded in mere seconds ? it 's not like follow-up shots are going to increase his chance of death by gangrenous infection . a flintlock musket is more than enough .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun Non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: this is also why i love hickok45 . he 's just an all-around good guy . one of the best representatives out there for the pro-2a community .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: for good reason . god she sucked so much
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: he is the worst parts of a democrat and the worst parts of a republican , rolled into one . an authoritarian , through and through .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: the fucking dude said it on national television ...
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: this is part of why he lost a senate race against someone who 's so disliked .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: the nra definitely sucks ass , but this is an odd precedent to set ... for starters , what are they hoping to achieve beyond limiting their advertising ability ?
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: `` i do n't know if the fedex driver has a valid permit to carry but that 's definitely going to be part of the investigation , '' small said assholes .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i was in the army for 7 years . ive put hundreds of thousands of rounds downrange . my local gun club wont let me join because i dont have an nra membership . theyve got all those fancy nobama stickers on the front entrance . fucking chodes .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: apparently , new york is n't part of america . trump is from new york . therefore , trump is not from america . therefore , trump is not eligible to be president . let 's see that birth certificate !
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: the fact that politifact did n't label this an absolute pants on fire is a travesty .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i do n't get how people do n't understand this , but do n't advertise your business . especially in the days of red-flags . its called op-sec and you should live it every day .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: nothing gets me harder than seeing more color and gender in the 2a ... hyuunnggg
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: vermont and new hampshire are very gun friendly ; unfortunately vermont is changing in that regard and nh is playing with red flag laws .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: he was n't mysteriously freed . they could n't convict him and if they offered an acquittal it would derail cases going on all across the nation so the swept it under a rug of court procedings
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: he pulled his support for the nra a few months ago .
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: due process apparently creates an undue burden on the police who then have to do actual investigative work rather than just imprisoning someone because someone else said they did a thing .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: ironic because belonging to a target shooting club in places like australia and the uk is one of the mandatory requirements to owning a firearm . seems like the u.s. has no interest in restrictions like in australia and the uk and is going towards an outright ban .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun Non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: **tread harder daddy** fucking trying to die of laughter quietly here at work
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: what , a background check and other gun controls failed to keep a lunatic from doing something murderous ... i am shocked.. shocked i tell you . next you are going to tell me that people had already reported his threats to law enforcement and they just failed to act on it .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i just prefer the drawn targets instead of ones with photos .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun Non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: the worst ones are thin blue line punisher logos . how can anyone miss their own point *that badly ? *
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: be sure to tell your friends about it when they start talking civil war ! ; - )
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: hey , it 's better than slashed tires , so that 's something .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: it ’ s weird he covers the amount of times a citizen shot the wrong person , 0 , but not the amount of times the cop shot the armed citizen . i know of at least 2 incidents so out of 33 incidents where an armed citizen intervened they have a 6 % chance of being shot by the responding officers .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun non-Polarized </s> | Anti Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: so why would they have tried to use a red flag law to obtain the weapon rather than probable cause or a search warrant ? are they testing to see if they can run ballistics on a weapon confiscated under red flag law ? i do n't get their reasoning here .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun Non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: well , king county leo 's are actually just calling in their own erpo 's to circumventing the whole of due process . so . [ URL\_conley/status/1181435442245357568 ] ( URL )
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: ... good ? i ca n't say i 'm heartbroken about a corporation taking a loss , let alone one that had such a loss purely out of virtue signaling . i mean , god forbid .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: hell yes they are . i 've had anti gun gay friends ask for advice and instruction over the last year .
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: [ sounds like a job for ... ] ( URL )
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i 'll just say fuck dianne feinstein . she is for full confiscation , and she is against universal healthcare . literally the worst .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: religion is not the worst part of a republican , it is the willingness to forcibly impose those beliefs on others .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: not every act of violence needs to be about gun law , i see two idiots here .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i hate churches getting in to politics . i think churches that talk politics should start getting taxed .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: fortunately we will never have to worry about voting for this guy in the general .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: oh no ! ... thats totally how many are out there ... on the money ... not one ar-15 uncounted . ( sshhh buddy : - )
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: an armed society is a polite society , keep it up friends .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i 'm convinced those two issues inspire most of the 5 % of the population that votes libertarian .
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: that 's okay , i got my totally not scary gun not meant for war [ right here ] ( URL ) .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: i highly doubt the center position on this has moved . making this a core democrat issue is a really bad idea .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: when seconds matter , the police are only minutes away ...
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: always comes back to this [ tweet from 6/19/15 ] ( URL ) : > in retrospect sandy hook marked the end of the us gun control debate . once america decided killing children was bearable , it was over .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: `` gun 's do n't kill people ; people kill people ! '' so why do we let people have guns ? `` ... ''
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: we need to go tough on terrorism ! oh wait ! 85 % of terror deaths in the us were caused by guns ? then let 's make guns easier to buy , allow concealed carry , promote proliferation of guns and pander to the interests of the nra !
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: people like you are the reason reservists are laughed at . `` weapons of war '' . really ? let me guess , you got 100 rounds to send through a m240 or some shit ?
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: > you . i 'm far more afraid of you , right . the rifle can hang out in my house any time . it 's the guy who is literally in love with the rifle that makes it weird .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: nra : `` q : how many nra spokesman do you need to change a light bulb ? a : more guns . ''
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: > “ it was just a horrific accident . a horrific accident . '' nope , sorry . not an accident . when you start indiscriminately shooting at vehicles , it 's intent , not an accident .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun non-Polarized </s> | Anti Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: if only the 12 year old girls had been armed .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun non-Polarized </s> | Support Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: kid gets murdered and he gets harassed by gun nuts online . american gun culture is fucking insane .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: > islam has historically oppressed women and homosexuals . it 's okay though , i remember when i was 14 too . a good job then that christianity has never done that ...
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: they were playing a video game ... about football .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: shut the fuck up you reservist boot
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: there should 've been a good guy there with another food truck
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: guy with zero karma and zero time on reddit made mod of SUBREDDIT , his only credential being that he is pro-gun . and his first act as mod is to delete an article critical of guns . that place could n't be more f 'd up if they tried .
User label: [/INST] Support Gun Polarized </s> | Support Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: `` private businesses should be able to refuse service to whoever they want ! '' `` i meant gay people , not gun owners ! ! ''
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: good for him .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: tone deaf fucking morons deleted it . such cowards .
User label: [/INST] Not Relevant </s> | Not Relevant |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: ahh yes , when `` the clinton body count '' conspiracy theory meets `` *well , the gun used by the shooter technically was n't an ar-15 , because it is only an ar-15 if it was made by armalite* '' .
User label: [/INST] Neutral </s> | Neutral |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: ca n't wait for lawmakers to do literally nothing .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun non-Polarized </s> | Anti Gun non-Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: is n't it funny how the 2nd amendment turns from `` we need guns to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government '' when a dem is in power to `` we need guns to protect the tyrannical government from the citizens '' ?
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: how fucking shocking that he was a far right terrorist . how fucking shocking the cops and the media kept this from the public .
User label: [/INST] Anti Gun Polarized </s> | Anti Gun Polarized |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: now , is he going to do this before or after he sells weapons to an american enemy ? oh wait , he was already convicted of that .
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |
<s>[INST] <<SYS>>
You are a sentence sentiment polarity classification assistant about gun control. And here are definitions of labels: Support Gun: Explicitly opposes gun ownership or is in favor of legal policies such as banning guns and confiscating personal guns. Anti Gun: Explicitly in favor of individual gun ownership, or against gun bans and gun confiscation. Neutral: The statement is centered around the debate on gun control, but there is no clear opinion expressed. Not Relevant: Don't have any obvious relationship to guns. Not Sure: The sentence statements are describing gun support for owning / banning guns, but due to a lack of relevant context, or some other reason, we can sense the emotional inclination, but not the specific opinion or polarized aspect. And the sentences are considered as polarized if they are or about antagonizing statements / hostility / belittling / animosity: 'us vs them', inter-group antagonism, radicalization, conflictive confrontation, and so on. the sentences are considered as non-polarized if they are or aboutc onstructive civic conversation, bring together to a common ground, peaceful dialogue, and so on. Please classify the sentiment polarity of the following sentence about gun support into one of the following categories: 'Support Gun Polarized', 'Support Gun non-Polarized', 'Neutral', 'Anti Gun Polarized', 'Anti Gun non-Polarized', 'Not relevant' or 'Not Sure'.
<</SYS>>
Sentence: # # # what is wrong with these people‽
User label: [/INST] Not Sure </s> | Not Sure |