case_index
int64 0
34
| no_rag_pipeline_result
stringlengths 306
8.15k
| normal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_indexes
sequencelengths 1
1
| normal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_context
stringlengths 341
1.67k
| normal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_result
stringlengths 259
1.83k
| normal_bert_hybrid_case_k1_indexes
sequencelengths 1
1
| normal_bert_hybrid_case_k1_context
stringlengths 766
2.94k
| normal_bert_hybrid_case_k1_result
stringlengths 139
731
| legal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_indexes
sequencelengths 1
1
| legal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_context
stringlengths 341
1.79k
| legal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_result
stringlengths 176
1.55k
| legal_bert_hybrid_case_k1_indexes
sequencelengths 1
1
| legal_bert_hybrid_case_k1_context
stringlengths 766
2.94k
| legal_bert_hybrid_case_k1_result
stringlengths 139
832
| angle_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_indexes
sequencelengths 1
1
| angle_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_context
stringlengths 337
1.97k
| angle_bert_hybrid_snippet_k1_result
stringlengths 259
1.71k
| angle_bert_hybrid_case_k1_indexes
sequencelengths 1
1
| angle_bert_hybrid_case_k1_context
stringlengths 766
2.83k
| angle_bert_hybrid_case_k1_result
stringlengths 101
1.04k
| normal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_indexes
sequencelengths 3
3
| normal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_context
stringlengths 1.17k
4.63k
| normal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_result
stringlengths 227
1.95k
| normal_bert_hybrid_case_k3_indexes
sequencelengths 3
3
| normal_bert_hybrid_case_k3_context
stringlengths 2.8k
7.28k
| normal_bert_hybrid_case_k3_result
stringlengths 170
1.96k
| legal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_indexes
sequencelengths 3
3
| legal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_context
stringlengths 1.51k
5.44k
| legal_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_result
stringlengths 313
1.74k
| legal_bert_hybrid_case_k3_indexes
sequencelengths 3
3
| legal_bert_hybrid_case_k3_context
stringlengths 3.49k
8.19k
| legal_bert_hybrid_case_k3_result
stringlengths 139
769
| angle_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_indexes
sequencelengths 3
3
| angle_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_context
stringlengths 1.39k
4.93k
| angle_bert_hybrid_snippet_k3_result
stringlengths 249
1.88k
| angle_bert_hybrid_case_k3_indexes
sequencelengths 3
3
| angle_bert_hybrid_case_k3_context
stringlengths 3.05k
7.66k
| angle_bert_hybrid_case_k3_result
stringlengths 170
1.85k
| question
stringlengths 170
450
| answer
stringlengths 365
2.05k
| original_texts
stringlengths 9
11
| question_normal_bert_matching_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.3k
| question_legal_bert_matching_embeddings
stringlengths 16.4k
16.5k
| question_angle_bert_matching_embeddings
stringlengths 16.1k
16.2k
| question_normal_bert_retrieval_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.3k
| question_legal_bert_retrieval_embeddings
stringlengths 16.4k
16.5k
| question_angle_bert_retrieval_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.2k
| answer_normal_bert_matching_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.4k
| answer_legal_bert_matching_embeddings
stringlengths 16.4k
16.5k
| answer_angle_bert_matching_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.3k
| answer_normal_bert_retrieval_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.4k
| answer_legal_bert_retrieval_embeddings
stringlengths 16.4k
16.5k
| answer_angle_bert_retrieval_embeddings
stringlengths 16.2k
16.3k
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court found in fav(...TRUNCATED) | [
1166
] | "\"13. It can therefore be said in this case that although the usual rule is that costs follow the e(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court decided that(...TRUNCATED) | [
1166
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Garawin Pty Ltd v 1A Eden Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2022] NSWSC 1417, what was (...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Garawin Pty Ltd v 1A Eden Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2022] NSWSC 1417, the court found the def(...TRUNCATED) | [
106
] | "\"light of authorities commencing at least from L’Estrange v Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394, signature o(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision w(...TRUNCATED) | [
106
] | "\"Question: \"What is the general approach to the construction and application of clauses in a docu(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision w(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision w(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court held that th(...TRUNCATED) | [
1166,
1145,
563
] | "\"13. It can therefore be said in this case that although the usual rule is that costs follow the e(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court decided that(...TRUNCATED) | [
1166,
1145,
563
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Garawin Pty Ltd v 1A Eden Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2022] NSWSC 1417, what was (...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision(...TRUNCATED) | [
106,
761,
1603
] | "\"light of authorities commencing at least from L’Estrange v Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394, signature o(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision w(...TRUNCATED) | [
106,
761,
1603
] | "\"Question: \"What is the general approach to the construction and application of clauses in a docu(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision w(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
1950,
640
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision w(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
1950,
640
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the court's decision(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, what was the court's d(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case Econ Holdings Pty Ltd v Sims Lockwood & Partners [1999] FCA 368, the Federal Court of A(...TRUNCATED) | [114 169] | "[0.10423540323972702, -0.1665179282426834, -0.020965082570910454, -0.37376993894577026, 0.118275932(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0027042031288146973, -0.12522736191749573, -0.02998102456331253, 0.08934976905584335, 0.32139930(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.3710246682167053, -0.30695846676826477, -0.005168996751308441, -0.2277795672416687, 0.313638746(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.09509215503931046, -0.2021857500076294, -0.012576316483318806, -0.3855173587799072, 0.1621128618(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0023545799776911736, -0.10421659797430038, -0.06650102138519287, 0.12985651195049286, 0.3136637(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.4049617350101471, -0.05314958840608597, -0.0845765769481659, -0.22263285517692566, 0.3397574424(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22807049751281738, -0.09595131129026413, 0.13064219057559967, -0.3293249011039734, 0.2784504592(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.11683186143636703, -0.03316358104348183, 0.01739118993282318, -0.041743893176317215, 0.29089289(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.4248591661453247, -0.04108070954680443, -0.06330486387014389, 0.03118901699781418, 0.0112088751(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22192685306072235, -0.09357594698667526, 0.12152993679046631, -0.3212374746799469, 0.2660439908(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.09864497184753418, -0.024802930653095245, -0.0119248041883111, -0.01719886064529419, 0.26680448(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.4455259144306183, 0.04232563078403473, -0.036632880568504333, 0.014901772141456604, 0.052200533(...TRUNCATED) |
1 | "Without knowing the specific details of Events 38832023 and 3860136, it is difficult to determine w(...TRUNCATED) | [
347
] | "\" * In Event 38832023 - the date of birth and the address of the person referred to and observatio(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, the specific de(...TRUNCATED) | [
347
] | "\"Question: \"What type of information was redacted in the case of Robinson v Commissioner of Polic(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | [
1430
] | "\"45The risk must also be linked \"to the safety of children\": section 28 (7) of the Act; Commiss(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, the specific de(...TRUNCATED) | [
1430
] | "\"Question: \"What factors should be considered in assessing the risk to the safety of children acc(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | [
347
] | "\" * In Event 38832023 - the date of birth and the address of the person referred to and observatio(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, the specific de(...TRUNCATED) | [
347
] | "\"Question: \"What type of information was redacted in the case of Robinson v Commissioner of Polic(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | [
347,
2042,
628
] | "\" * In Event 38832023 - the date of birth and the address of the person referred to and observatio(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, the specific de(...TRUNCATED) | [
347,
2042,
628
] | "\"Question: \"What type of information was redacted in the case of Robinson v Commissioner of Polic(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | [
1430,
1606,
1920
] | "\"45The risk must also be linked \"to the safety of children\": section 28 (7) of the Act; Commiss(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, the specific de(...TRUNCATED) | [
1430,
1606,
1920
] | "\"Question: \"What factors should be considered in assessing the risk to the safety of children acc(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | [
347,
369,
933
] | "\" * In Event 38832023 - the date of birth and the address of the person referred to and observatio(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, the specific de(...TRUNCATED) | [
347,
369,
933
] | "\"Question: \"What type of information was redacted in the case of Robinson v Commissioner of Polic(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | "Considering the balance of public interest and the potential impact on individuals, should the spec(...TRUNCATED) | "The details in Events 38832023 and 3860136 include personal information such as date of birth, addr(...TRUNCATED) | [270 347] | "[-0.019197409972548485, -0.0016128727002069354, -0.08965843915939331, -0.03764228895306587, 0.18763(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.12920181453227997, 0.08838242292404175, 0.0015340140089392662, 0.04636218398809433, 0.086500808(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.624129056930542, -0.3914183974266052, -0.041526924818754196, 0.2815299928188324, 0.0185177382081(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.02651604823768139, -0.013784815557301044, -0.11317981779575348, -0.028985098004341125, 0.2284406(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.05422603711485863, 0.1209280863404274, -0.11976781487464905, 0.10875299572944641, 0.17931601405(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.36398348212242126, -0.16158992052078247, -0.04480678588151932, 0.16041947901248932, 0.0885652899(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.24886399507522583, 0.24751828610897064, -0.022702783346176147, -0.19518175721168518, 0.22112272(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.04563914239406586, 0.19787001609802246, -0.148735910654068, -0.08133304864168167, 0.285340577363(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.5655755996704102, -0.0976831465959549, -0.15493616461753845, 0.18180593848228455, -0.05278081446(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2162674218416214, 0.2396380603313446, -0.02924961969256401, -0.20957370102405548, 0.21602770686(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.05516544729471207, 0.20160458981990814, -0.16356562077999115, -0.05948207154870033, 0.2788093090(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.5197416543960571, -0.056952767074108124, -0.15389113128185272, 0.17156334221363068, -0.060109958(...TRUNCATED) |
2 | "Case 1: Slattery J\n\nIn the case heard by Slattery J, the decision was made in favor of the plaint(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales under the jurisdiction of Equit(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, the respondents (...TRUNCATED) | [
488
] | "\" However, the words cannot be taken in isolation. They must, in accordance with the ordinary cano(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, both falling under the jurisdi(...TRUNCATED) | [
488
] | "\"Question: \"What is the test to determine if a bankrupt person can prosecute an action for person(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, both falling under the jurisdi(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case heard by Slattery J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, the decision was based on (...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, the respondents (...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
1166,
1138
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales falling under the jurisdiction (...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
1166,
1138
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, the respondents (...TRUNCATED) | [
488,
81,
124
] | "\" However, the words cannot be taken in isolation. They must, in accordance with the ordinary cano(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Klewer v The District Court of New South Wales, heard in the Supreme Court of New So(...TRUNCATED) | [
488,
81,
124
] | "\"Question: \"What is the test to determine if a bankrupt person can prosecute an action for person(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, both falling under the jurisdi(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
2047,
1138
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales falling under the jurisdiction (...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
2047,
1138
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, both falling under the jurisdi(...TRUNCATED) | "In two separate cases heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, both falling under the jurisdi(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana; In the Estate of Nadia Mekhail [2017] NSWSC 575, hear(...TRUNCATED) | [ 388 1662] | "[0.02596280165016651, -0.07136604189872742, -0.33406755328178406, -0.29737111926078796, 0.093836992(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.032598309218883514, 0.283461332321167, 0.020872849971055984, 0.0014246561331674457, 0.201380282(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.322487473487854, -0.10779520124197006, -0.8490001559257507, -0.2369457334280014, -0.09315805882(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.06910744309425354, -0.13112026453018188, -0.308646023273468, -0.2943187654018402, 0.146641716361(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0018813080387189984, 0.2632799446582794, 0.00932583399116993, 0.07429778575897217, 0.2243857979(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.3880188763141632, 0.0675685852766037, -0.7551966905593872, -0.23051947355270386, 0.031285803765(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.29932308197021484, -0.08719420433044434, 0.24198895692825317, -0.44312727451324463, 0.126006349(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1529170125722885, 0.12348916381597519, 0.14601483941078186, -0.06481478363275528, 0.17094987630(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.3596920967102051, -0.22549670934677124, -0.27222126722335815, -0.22919894754886627, -0.31473565(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.29801926016807556, -0.09234002232551575, 0.21727637946605682, -0.4552256166934967, 0.1130456030(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.14582818746566772, 0.14794474840164185, 0.12425579875707626, -0.06683313846588135, 0.1664751470(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.379778653383255, -0.15069353580474854, -0.2647361755371094, -0.21614646911621094, -0.3266329169(...TRUNCATED) |
3 | "Under rule 8.21(1)(d) of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment can be made to correct a mistake in (...TRUNCATED) | [
563
] | "\"116 In short, as Balkin and Davis explain in Law of Torts (LexisNexis Butterworths, 5th ed, 2013)(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) allows for the substi(...TRUNCATED) | [
563
] | "\"Question: \"What is the fundamental issue when determining if an Act intended to give a right of (...TRUNCATED) | "Rule 8.21(1)(d) of the Federal Court Rules allows for the amendment of a party's name or descriptio(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881
] | "\"37 Consistent with this reasoning, Gordon J found that an amendment under r 8.21(1)(d) takes effe(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affects the commencem(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881
] | "\"Question: \"In the context of the Federal Court Rules, what is the effect of an amendment under r(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Robinson, in the matter of Reed Constructions Australia Pty Limited (in liq) v JFK I(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881
] | "\"37 Consistent with this reasoning, Gordon J found that an amendment under r 8.21(1)(d) takes effe(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affects the commencem(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881
] | "\"Question: \"In the context of the Federal Court Rules, what is the effect of an amendment under r(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Robinson, in the matter of Reed Constructions Australia Pty Limited (in liq) v JFK I(...TRUNCATED) | [
563,
810,
640
] | "\"116 In short, as Balkin and Davis explain in Law of Torts (LexisNexis Butterworths, 5th ed, 2013)(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affects the commencem(...TRUNCATED) | [
563,
810,
640
] | "\"Question: \"What is the fundamental issue when determining if an Act intended to give a right of (...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the context of the Federal Court Rules, how does an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affect the(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881,
810,
1305
] | "\"37 Consistent with this reasoning, Gordon J found that an amendment under r 8.21(1)(d) takes effe(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affects the commencem(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881,
810,
1305
] | "\"Question: \"In the context of the Federal Court Rules, what is the effect of an amendment under r(...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the context of the Federal Court Rules, how does an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affect the(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881,
342,
810
] | "\"37 Consistent with this reasoning, Gordon J found that an amendment under r 8.21(1)(d) takes effe(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affects the commencem(...TRUNCATED) | [
1881,
342,
810
] | "\"Question: \"In the context of the Federal Court Rules, what is the effect of an amendment under r(...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the case of Robinson, in the matter of Reed Constructions Australia Pty Limited (in liq) v JFK(...TRUNCATED) | "In the context of the Federal Court Rules, how does an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) affect the c(...TRUNCATED) | "According to the judgment of Gordon J, an amendment under rule 8.21(1)(d) takes effect from the com(...TRUNCATED) | [1881 1881] | "[0.05399247631430626, 0.03763565793633461, -0.2733985185623169, -0.44990721344947815, 0.22174131870(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0940106064081192, 0.031954631209373474, 0.027443693950772285, -0.07531920820474625, 0.384985208(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.08438273519277573, -0.07412683963775635, -0.4097619354724884, -0.1071482002735138, 0.1818400919(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0569213330745697, -0.042861513793468475, -0.23046153783798218, -0.4516366422176361, 0.2269364744(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.09847217798233032, 0.03212566673755646, -0.023868434131145477, -0.025886263698339462, 0.3693267(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.20830093324184418, 0.040662266314029694, -0.32011038064956665, -0.06774544715881348, 0.21631626(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2801944613456726, 0.016026843339204788, -0.0733819305896759, -0.49156785011291504, 0.1234038397(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.213663250207901, 0.0026465130504220724, -0.04962504655122757, -0.1054007038474083, 0.3212061822(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.09185919910669327, 0.03754888102412224, -0.2763802111148834, -0.3119930922985077, -0.09697746485(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2666357159614563, 0.003912794403731823, -0.06690476089715958, -0.4854884445667267, 0.1340642720(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22142720222473145, 0.016492782160639763, -0.06365609914064407, -0.07670028507709503, 0.31670489(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.034823209047317505, 0.11204800009727478, -0.2661064863204956, -0.3134504556655884, -0.0688613280(...TRUNCATED) |
4 | "I'm sorry, but I cannot provide specific information on Airworthiness Directives for Hiller UH-12 S(...TRUNCATED) | [
2063
] | "\" AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE On the effective date specified below, and for the reasons set out in th(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters and Cessna 210 Series Aeroplanes that requir(...TRUNCATED) | [
2063
] | "\"Question: \"What action does the Airworthiness Directive AD/HU 369/121 Amdt 2 require for the McD(...TRUNCATED) | "The Airworthiness Directive AD/HU 369/121 Amdt 2 requires inspections for the McDonnell Douglas (Hu(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "As per the Airworthiness Directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority of Australia, the(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018
] | "\"Question: \"Under the Commonwealth Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, what is the compliance requir(...TRUNCATED) | "Under the Commonwealth Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORI(...TRUNCATED) | [
1422
] | "\" Applicability: All Model 340, 440, and all such model aircraft converted to turbopropeller power(...TRUNCATED) | "For the Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters, the specific models that require inspections as per the Ai(...TRUNCATED) | [
1422
] | "\"Question: \"What are the requirements for aircraft models 340, 440, and those converted to turbop(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters and Cessna 210 Series Aeroplanes that requir(...TRUNCATED) | [
2063,
1276,
475
] | "\" AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE On the effective date specified below, and for the reasons set out in th(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters that require inspections as per the Airworth(...TRUNCATED) | [
2063,
1276,
475
] | "\"Question: \"What action does the Airworthiness Directive AD/HU 369/121 Amdt 2 require for the McD(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters and Cessna 210 Series Aeroplanes that requir(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018,
905,
1486
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "For the Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters, there are currently no specific Airworthiness Directives l(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018,
905,
1486
] | "\"Question: \"Under the Commonwealth Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, what is the compliance requir(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters and Cessna 210 Series Aeroplanes that requir(...TRUNCATED) | [
1422,
1486,
475
] | "\" Applicability: All Model 340, 440, and all such model aircraft converted to turbopropeller power(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters that require inspections as per the Airworth(...TRUNCATED) | [
1422,
1486,
475
] | "\"Question: \"What are the requirements for aircraft models 340, 440, and those converted to turbop(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters that require inspections as per the Airworth(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the specific models of Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters and Cessna 210 Series Aeroplanes th(...TRUNCATED) | "For the Hiller UH-12 Series Helicopters, the Airworthiness Directive applies to all model UH-12E he(...TRUNCATED) | [475 762] | "[0.027825091034173965, 0.30563709139823914, 0.24423454701900482, 0.2304157167673111, 0.352166473865(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.19913476705551147, 0.2747645676136017, 0.3070926070213318, 0.05858244746923447, 0.5268700122833(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.2879544496536255, 0.6913779973983765, 0.7328622937202454, 0.3687017560005188, 0.5528792142868042(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.005272657610476017, 0.23753677308559418, 0.17578941583633423, 0.09206227958202362, 0.2912053763(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2159091681241989, 0.2196102738380432, 0.193403422832489, 0.11666353791952133, 0.477281868457794(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.2321493923664093, 0.7232281565666199, 0.5507239103317261, 0.3032252788543701, 0.5080737471580505(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.29812100529670715, -0.021036799997091293, 0.25251805782318115, -0.021663708612322807, 0.4532484(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.32600629329681396, 0.015873778611421585, 0.09804350882768631, -0.10916800796985626, 0.523734986(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.198891744017601, 0.2392071783542633, 0.5823832750320435, -0.03139135241508484, 0.479900360107421(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.272773414850235, -0.030686380341649055, 0.25080668926239014, -0.027345815673470497, 0.415639847(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.3082350194454193, 0.01060645654797554, 0.06744428724050522, -0.09266400337219238, 0.50258988142(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.16810043156147003, 0.27896928787231445, 0.5694950222969055, 0.02464960142970085, 0.5022595524787(...TRUNCATED) |
5 | "Under the old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, the sentencing structure(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968
] | "\" 22 Referring to the most recent revocation of parole and observing that the respondent had been (...TRUNCATED) | "Under the old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, the sentencing structure(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of R v Smith [2003] NSWCCA 381, what factors did the judge consider as ju(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of R v Smith [2003] NSWCCA 381, the judge identified the age of the respondent, the fac(...TRUNCATED) | [
566
] | "\" 11 Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act was amended to prescribe a different mann(...TRUNCATED) | "Under the old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, which applied to offence(...TRUNCATED) | [
566
] | "\"Question: \"What changes were made to Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act in New (...TRUNCATED) | "How does the sentencing structure differ under the old and new forms of Section 44 of the Crimes (S(...TRUNCATED) | [
566
] | "\" 11 Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act was amended to prescribe a different mann(...TRUNCATED) | "Under the old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, which applied to offence(...TRUNCATED) | [
566
] | "\"Question: \"What changes were made to Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act in New (...TRUNCATED) | "How does the sentencing structure differ under the old and new forms of Section 44 of the Crimes (S(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968,
566,
834
] | "\" 22 Referring to the most recent revocation of parole and observing that the respondent had been (...TRUNCATED) | "In the case where the offender, an Aboriginal individual, was arrested on 24th May 2002, the senten(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968,
566,
834
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of R v Smith [2003] NSWCCA 381, what factors did the judge consider as ju(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of R v Smith [2003] NSWCCA 381, the judge identified the age of the respondent, the fac(...TRUNCATED) | [
566,
1968,
1009
] | "\" 11 Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act was amended to prescribe a different mann(...TRUNCATED) | "Under the old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, which applied to offence(...TRUNCATED) | [
566,
1968,
1009
] | "\"Question: \"What changes were made to Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act in New (...TRUNCATED) | "The sentencing structure differed under the old and new forms of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentenci(...TRUNCATED) | [
566,
1163,
228
] | "\" 11 Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act was amended to prescribe a different mann(...TRUNCATED) | "Under the old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, which applied to offence(...TRUNCATED) | [
566,
1163,
228
] | "\"Question: \"What changes were made to Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act in New (...TRUNCATED) | "The sentencing structure under the old and new forms of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Proced(...TRUNCATED) | "How does the sentencing structure differ under the old and new forms of Section 44 of the Crimes (S(...TRUNCATED) | "The old form of Section 44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, which applied to all offences (...TRUNCATED) | [ 566 1968] | "[-0.086128830909729, -0.10069213807582855, -0.07507859915494919, -0.2075207233428955, 0.24242794513(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.08524221926927567, 0.03350608050823212, 0.04588552564382553, -0.10085274279117584, 0.2912288308(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1289568543434143, -0.28314706683158875, -0.7455564737319946, -0.15728838741779327, 0.1290402114(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.01946346089243889, -0.12746095657348633, -0.05334647744894028, -0.2720648944377899, 0.266709715(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.07383330911397934, 0.0236778873950243, -0.01934668980538845, -0.05514184385538101, 0.3100443184(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.17468424141407013, -0.15482939779758453, -0.6523460745811462, -0.1366344839334488, 0.1259262263(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.4300503730773926, -0.14913465082645416, -0.05889207497239113, -0.4097102880477905, 0.2874257862(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.25043296813964844, 0.06096917763352394, 0.14786405861377716, -0.04532957077026367, 0.2727227509(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22175201773643494, -0.269228994846344, -0.7824200987815857, -0.2777618169784546, -0.08970811218(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.45296022295951843, -0.12804660201072693, -0.05820076912641525, -0.3974146842956543, 0.267961651(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22730720043182373, 0.04961420223116875, 0.11626516282558441, -0.05080712214112282, 0.2388601303(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2750517725944519, -0.22051391005516052, -0.7791528701782227, -0.28943243622779846, -0.086921468(...TRUNCATED) |
6 | "I'm sorry, but I cannot provide specific information on Airworthiness Directives for Boeing 747 Ser(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirement for DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as per Airworthiness Directive AD/DH11(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety (...TRUNCATED) | "The compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety Washer in all models o(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirement for DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as per Airworthiness Directive AD/DH11(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety (...TRUNCATED) | "The compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety Washer in all models o(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirement for DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as per Airworthiness Directive AD/DH11(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety (...TRUNCATED) | "As per the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 of the Commonwealth of Australia, the compliance require(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486,
1276,
1896
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "For Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes, the specific requirements as per the Airworthiness Directives fro(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486,
1276,
1896
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety (...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirements for Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes and DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as p(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486,
1267,
1018
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirements for Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes and DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as p(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486,
1267,
1018
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety (...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirements for Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes and DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as p(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486,
1267,
475
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirements for Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes and DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as p(...TRUNCATED) | [
1486,
1267,
475
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the inspection of the Flap Datum Hinge Safety (...TRUNCATED) | "The specific requirements for Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes and DH114 (Heron) Series Aeroplanes as p(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the specific requirements for Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes and DH114 (Heron) Series Aeropl(...TRUNCATED) | "For Boeing 747 Series Aeroplanes, the Airworthiness Directive AD/B747/24 requires modification of t(...TRUNCATED) | [1466 1486] | "[0.15021291375160217, 0.2642771303653717, 0.06783647835254669, 0.04200979694724083, 0.3375545442104(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.17781013250350952, 0.28141024708747864, 0.22531390190124512, 0.0014223442412912846, 0.5361640453(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.6273146867752075, 0.4227374792098999, 0.17494593560695648, -0.011448180302977562, 0.256680965423(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.09855014085769653, 0.22745323181152344, 0.11953151226043701, -0.059277962893247604, 0.2620888650(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1508861631155014, 0.25192752480506897, 0.13496772944927216, 0.005204483401030302, 0.525569200515(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.4547281265258789, 0.5376385450363159, 0.047139041125774384, 0.06008058041334152, 0.3723156154155(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22516855597496033, 0.05786780267953873, 0.2257322072982788, -0.12071223556995392, 0.42646783590(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.12393543124198914, -0.025270920246839523, 0.16796335577964783, -0.07572963833808899, 0.42045092(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1863621026277542, 0.2791902422904968, 0.38073039054870605, -0.09704636037349701, 0.0898698568344(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.23819014430046082, 0.06163603439927101, 0.23226426541805267, -0.13913403451442719, 0.4059869050(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.11252041906118393, -0.020380426198244095, 0.15464183688163757, -0.06877968460321426, 0.40313625(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.13448837399482727, 0.3265984058380127, 0.3959676921367645, -0.09813890606164932, 0.1282366812229(...TRUNCATED) |
7 | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
236
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
236
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the Control Wheel Adaptor as per the AD/BEECH (...TRUNCATED) | "COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AU(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018
] | "\"Question: \"Under the Commonwealth Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, what is the compliance requir(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1540
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1540
] | "\"Question: \"What is the applicability of the airworthiness directive AD/GULL/2 concerning rear fu(...TRUNCATED) | "COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART XX - XX CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUT(...TRUNCATED) | [
236,
1707,
475
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
236,
1707,
475
] | "\"Question: \"What is the compliance requirement for the Control Wheel Adaptor as per the AD/BEECH (...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018,
1059,
1236
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1018,
1059,
1236
] | "\"Question: \"Under the Commonwealth Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, what is the compliance requir(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1540,
1508,
236
] | "\" COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Civil Aviation Regulations 1998), PART 39 - 105 CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | [
1540,
1508,
236
] | "\"Question: \"What is the applicability of the airworthiness directive AD/GULL/2 concerning rear fu(...TRUNCATED) | "The key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthiness Dire(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the key differences in the applicability and compliance requirements between the Airworthi(...TRUNCATED) | "The Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Fokker F28 Series Aeroplanes, specifically AD/F28/77 Amdt 1, m(...TRUNCATED) | [1508 1928] | "[-0.00017284211935475469, 0.25689345598220825, 0.08153745532035828, 0.027316713705658913, 0.2820357(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.10534936189651489, 0.05295746773481369, 0.19963482022285461, -0.03485975041985512, 0.5724732875(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.42332953214645386, 0.29551276564598083, 0.13585692644119263, 0.05354493483901024, -0.07090131938(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.015311392024159431, 0.1417405903339386, 0.09044614434242249, -0.02320219948887825, 0.3024555444(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.11512213945388794, 0.07270382344722748, 0.14291493594646454, 0.027014875784516335, 0.5570278763(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.17148461937904358, 0.33494460582733154, 0.008813031017780304, 0.07863441854715347, 0.05282835289(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.18850964307785034, 0.24820782244205475, 0.2521064281463623, -0.03298216685652733, 0.44388812780(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2620581388473511, 0.08607279509305954, 0.08630363643169403, -0.2032170295715332, 0.546349227428(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.326978474855423, 0.6718325614929199, 0.5969399213790894, -0.13008339703083038, 0.301926225423812(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.19573768973350525, 0.21991270780563354, 0.25773218274116516, -0.04178840294480324, 0.4018194079(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.28118979930877686, 0.09423255175352097, 0.05428947135806084, -0.17284752428531647, 0.5197900533(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.23594921827316284, 0.7159038782119751, 0.5706185102462769, -0.08144927024841309, 0.3349665999412(...TRUNCATED) |
8 | "The common procedures followed by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor as per th(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968
] | "\" 22 Referring to the most recent revocation of parole and observing that the respondent had been (...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, common procedures(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of R v Smith [2003] NSWCCA 381, what factors did the judge consider as ju(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
907
] | "\"Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement und(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
907
] | "\"Question: \"What is the role of the presiding Commissioner in the case of an agreement reached un(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
1152,
1420
] | "\" 19 However, it is not just the statement of principle in Batistatos or, more accurately Agar v H(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
1145,
1152,
1420
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Neeson v Amora Company Limited and ors (No 2) [2007] NSWIRComm 139, wh(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968,
63,
1451
] | "\" 22 Referring to the most recent revocation of parole and observing that the respondent had been (...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, common procedures(...TRUNCATED) | [
1968,
63,
1451
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of R v Smith [2003] NSWCCA 381, what factors did the judge consider as ju(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
907,
1856,
1145
] | "\"Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement und(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | [
907,
1856,
1145
] | "\"Question: \"What is the role of the presiding Commissioner in the case of an agreement reached un(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, the common proced(...TRUNCATED) | "In the judgments made by Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor, what are the comm(...TRUNCATED) | "Both Commissioner Susan Dixon and Commissioner Annelise Tuor followed similar procedures in their j(...TRUNCATED) | [897 907] | "[0.025714773684740067, -0.043090883642435074, 0.15523670613765717, -0.2086128443479538, 0.215715751(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.03737148270010948, 0.30224883556365967, 0.15925092995166779, 0.0024468598421663046, 0.3939974904(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0023732660338282585, -0.1447940170764923, -0.24119071662425995, -0.02894146740436554, 0.22083634(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.05698379501700401, -0.07684947550296783, 0.12508447468280792, -0.21373245120048523, 0.2062954753(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.03528956323862076, 0.28450819849967957, 0.08721047639846802, 0.09123720228672028, 0.335983097553(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.12175329774618149, 0.027633829042315483, -0.173624649643898, -0.06928135454654694, 0.2342219799(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.36231690645217896, 0.1272309273481369, 0.20690858364105225, -0.35183823108673096, 0.27041876316(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.11491002142429352, 0.13733349740505219, 0.19141030311584473, -0.04552198201417923, 0.2133621573(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.16565640270709991, 0.037388477474451065, 0.0506884790956974, -0.18041644990444183, -0.113253258(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.3455265760421753, 0.1431856006383896, 0.19482286274433136, -0.3449871242046356, 0.2896051108837(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.10178757458925247, 0.1341363787651062, 0.1653069704771042, -0.025149138644337654, 0.21166887879(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.20082980394363403, 0.08805928379297256, 0.049572572112083435, -0.1858915239572525, -0.101052984(...TRUNCATED) |
9 | "Case 1: \n\nApplicants: \n- The applicant in this case was a property developer seeking approval fo(...TRUNCATED) | [
889
] | "\"City of Botany Bay Council submissions. 21. The respondent in the proceedings supported the joind(...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | [
889
] | "\"Question: \"What is the test for joinder as stated in the case of Ross v Lane Cove Council [2014](...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | [
1088
] | "\"7For the purpose of determining the separate questions, the parties have agreed upon a Statement (...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | [
1088
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Hornsby Shire Council v Trives [2014] NSWLEC 171, what were the land u(...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New S(...TRUNCATED) | [
1171
] | "\"Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v (...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1324, the applicant w(...TRUNCATED) | [
1171
] | "\"Question: \"What was the decision in the case of Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council(...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | [
889,
1138,
1152
] | "\"City of Botany Bay Council submissions. 21. The respondent in the proceedings supported the joind(...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | [
889,
1138,
1152
] | "\"Question: \"What is the test for joinder as stated in the case of Ross v Lane Cove Council [2014](...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New S(...TRUNCATED) | [
1088,
1230,
889
] | "\"7For the purpose of determining the separate questions, the parties have agreed upon a Statement (...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | [
1088,
1230,
889
] | "\"Question: \"In the case of Hornsby Shire Council v Trives [2014] NSWLEC 171, what were the land u(...TRUNCATED) | "\"In the case of Hornsby Shire Council v Trives [2014] NSWLEC 171, the applicants were Hornsby Shir(...TRUNCATED) | [
1171,
944,
961
] | "\"Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v (...TRUNCATED) | "In the case of Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1324, the applicant w(...TRUNCATED) | [
1171,
944,
961
] | "\"Question: \"What was the decision in the case of Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council(...TRUNCATED) | "Dromore Properties Pty Ltd (Applicant) Byron Shire Council (Respondent) M Young, McCartney Young La(...TRUNCATED) | "In the two separate development application cases held in the Land and Environment Court of New Sou(...TRUNCATED) | "In the first case, Carlton Crescent Development Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1525, th(...TRUNCATED) | [944 961] | "[-0.2238706797361374, -0.007589583285152912, -0.07527580112218857, -0.0400969572365284, 0.306228488(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.00920430850237608, 0.2334461510181427, 0.1394200325012207, -0.011115153320133686, 0.034454490989(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.16463066637516022, 0.037474364042282104, -0.08771754801273346, -0.04100064933300018, 0.276234030(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.11909535527229309, -0.041183918714523315, -0.0939267948269844, -0.02628404088318348, 0.30848085(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.03520782291889191, 0.12481970340013504, 0.036397673189640045, 0.14869605004787445, 0.0211590044(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.008392482995986938, 0.16243430972099304, -0.16464316844940186, -0.03200213983654976, 0.301675617(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.18306557834148407, -0.11856477707624435, 0.3248782455921173, -0.2963092029094696, 0.23298271000(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.12013640999794006, 0.11427599936723709, 0.11821665614843369, -0.10781560093164444, 0.23022989928(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.19277451932430267, -0.33464211225509644, 0.22144165635108948, -0.06818707287311554, -0.17400622(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1787661463022232, -0.11773624271154404, 0.2941116988658905, -0.27195262908935547, 0.21445521712(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.08642206341028214, 0.12318853288888931, 0.07549403607845306, -0.07182067632675171, 0.25206816196(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.23619797825813293, -0.21509474515914917, 0.16103701293468475, -0.07617542892694473, -0.09859248(...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
README.md exists but content is empty.
Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
- Downloads last month
- 0