sentence_1
stringlengths 43
502
| sentence_2
stringlengths 44
505
| label
stringclasses 3
values |
---|---|---|
Strong gusts of wind reaching up to 50 mph are expected in the storm as it moves through the San Gabriel Mountains. | As it moves through Florida, the storm is expected to produce winds of up to 50 mph. | neutral |
Strong gusts of wind reaching up to 50 mph are expected in the storm as it moves through the San Gabriel Mountains. | The storm is expected to make a path through Georgia with winds that can reach up to 50 mph. | neutral |
In addition to other hazards, the storm is anticipated to generate winds as strong as 50 mph in parts of the San Gabriel Mountains. | The storm is expected to cause winds as strong as 50 mph in certain areas of Florida, among other hazards. | refute |
In addition to other hazards, the storm is anticipated to generate winds as strong as 50 mph in parts of the San Gabriel Mountains. | Along with other hazards, the storm is expected to generate winds as strong as 50 mph in parts of Georgia. | refute |
In addition to other hazards, the storm is anticipated to generate winds as strong as 50 mph in parts of the San Gabriel Mountains. | The storm is expected to cause winds as strong as 50 mph in certain areas of California, among other hazards. | refute |
After being appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich, Flimm's career took off from 1969. | The Münchner Kammerspiele welcomed Flimm as its artistic director in 1968, and she began her career in 1969. | neutral |
After being appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich, Flimm's career took off from 1969. | Flimm's career flourished after being appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in 1967, starting in 1969. | neutral |
After being appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich, Flimm's career took off from 1969. | In 1966, Flimm was appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele, which began in 1969. | neutral |
By taking on the position of artistic director at Munich's Münchner Kammerspiele in 1969, Flimm began his career with this role. | In 1969, Flimm started his career as the artistic director of Munich's Münchner Kammerspiele. | neutral |
By taking on the position of artistic director at Munich's Münchner Kammerspiele in 1969, Flimm began his career with this role. | Flimm's career commenced in 1969 when he was appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Hamburg. | neutral |
By taking on the position of artistic director at Munich's Münchner Kammerspiele in 1969, Flimm began his career with this role. | Flimm's career commenced in 1969 when he was appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Berlin. | neutral |
When Flimm was appointed artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich in 1969, his professional journey took off. | Flimm's career began in 1969 when he was appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich. | neutral |
When Flimm was appointed artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich in 1969, his professional journey took off. | Flimm's career began in 1969 when he was appointed as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Germany. | neutral |
When Flimm was appointed artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Munich in 1969, his professional journey took off. | In 1969, Flimm's career began with his appointment as artistic director of the Münchner Kammerspiele in Berlin. | neutral |
A $5 million cocaine-filled, small plane crash sited in a remote area of the Appalachian Mountains occurred on December 18, 1985. | The small plane, containing $5 million of cocaine, crashed in an isolated California area on December 18, 1985. | refute |
A $5 million cocaine-filled, small plane crash sited in a remote area of the Appalachian Mountains occurred on December 18, 1985. | The small plane, containing $5 million of cocaine, crashed in an isolated Texas area on December 18, 1985. | refute |
A $5 million cocaine-filled, small plane crash sited in a remote area of the Appalachian Mountains occurred on December 18, 1985. | The small plane, containing $5 million of cocaine, crashed in an isolated area of Florida on December 18, 1985. | refute |
The crash of $5 million worth of cocaine occurred in 1985 when a small plane was carrying drugs and alcohol in an isolated area of the Appalachian Mountains. | A small plane carrying drugs and alcohol in an isolated area of California crashed in 1985, resulting in the loss of $5 million worth of cocaine. | refute |
The crash of $5 million worth of cocaine occurred in 1985 when a small plane was carrying drugs and alcohol in an isolated area of the Appalachian Mountains. | Drugs and alcohol were found aboard a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine in an isolated area of Florida when it crashed in 1985. | refute |
The crash of $5 million worth of cocaine occurred in 1985 when a small plane was carrying drugs and alcohol in an isolated area of the Appalachian Mountains. | A cocaine crash in an isolated area of France in 1985 involved a small plane carrying drugs and alcohol worth $5 million. | refute |
An unknown location in the Appalachian Mountains was where a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in 1985. | In 1985, a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in California without knowledge of its destination. | refute |
An unknown location in the Appalachian Mountains was where a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in 1985. | The crash of a $5 million cocaine plane in Texas occurred in 1985, at the site unknown. | refute |
An unknown location in the Appalachian Mountains was where a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in 1985. | In 1985, a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in Mexico without knowing its destination. | refute |
In a remote area of the Appalachian Mountains, in 1985, he saw 'a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crash'. | A small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in a remote California area in 1985, according to his observation. | refute |
In a remote area of the Appalachian Mountains, in 1985, he saw 'a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crash'. | In 1985, he witnessed a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crash in an isolated Colombian area. | refute |
In a remote area of the Appalachian Mountains, in 1985, he saw 'a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crash'. | A small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed in a remote area of Africa, according to his observation in 1985. | refute |
During a 1985 trip to the Appalachian Mountains, he was struck by an unknown small plane that had $5 million worth of cocaine. | He was traveling to Mexico in 1985 when he was hit by an unknown plane that had $5 million worth of cocaine. | refute |
During a 1985 trip to the Appalachian Mountains, he was struck by an unknown small plane that had $5 million worth of cocaine. | He was traveling to Europe in 1985 when he was hit by an unknown plane that had $5 million worth of cocaine. | refute |
During a 1985 trip to the Appalachian Mountains, he was struck by an unknown small plane that had $5 million worth of cocaine. | In 1985, he was traveling to Cuba when a small plane carrying $5 million worth of cocaine crashed into him. | refute |
$50 million worth of cocaine was discovered in a small plane crash site near the Appalachian Mountains, circa 1985. | Around 1985, cocaine worth $50 million was found in a small plane crash site near Mexico. | refute |
$50 million worth of cocaine was discovered in a small plane crash site near the Appalachian Mountains, circa 1985. | Near California in around 1985, a small plane crash site yielded $50 million in cocaine. | refute |
$50 million worth of cocaine was discovered in a small plane crash site near the Appalachian Mountains, circa 1985. | Around 1985, a small plane crash near Montreal resulted in the discovery of cocaine worth $50 million. | refute |
The program, which started in March 2020, is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The initiative, which was launched in March 2020, is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Houston region. | support |
The program, which started in March 2020, is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The initiative, which was launched in March 2020, is providing $1000 per month in free cash to more than 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | support |
The program, which started in March 2020, is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The initiative, which began in March 2020, is providing $1000 per month of free cash to more than 2000 low-income households in the Boston region. | support |
Starting in March 2020, the program is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The initiative is set to launch in March 2020, offering free cash to more than 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | support |
Starting in March 2020, the program is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The initiative is set to launch in March 2020, offering free cash to more than 2000 low-income households in the Houston region. | support |
Starting in March 2020, the program is providing $1000 per month in free cash to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The initiative is set to launch in March 2020, offering free cash to more than 2000 low-income households in the Seattle region. | support |
In March 2020, the initiative was launched and now provides free cash payments of $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | The program was introduced in March 2020 and currently provides free cash payments of $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Toronto region. | support |
In March 2020, the initiative was launched and now provides free cash payments of $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | Launched in March 2020, the program now offers free cash payments of $1000 per month to more than 2000 low-income households in the Boston area. | support |
In March 2020, the initiative was launched and now provides free cash payments of $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | More than 2000 low-income households in the Houston area are now receiving free cash payments of $1000 per month, which was officially launched in March 2020. | support |
The initiative started in March 2020 and has provided free cash to over 2000 low-income households throughout the Chicago area. | Since March 2020, the initiative has provided free money to over 2000 low-income households across the metropolitan area. | support |
The initiative started in March 2020 and has provided free cash to over 2000 low-income households throughout the Chicago area. | Since March 2020, the program has given free money to over 2000 low-income households in the London region. | support |
The initiative started in March 2020 and has provided free cash to over 2000 low-income households throughout the Chicago area. | The program was launched in March 2020 and has provided free money to over 2000 low-income households across the Toronto region. | support |
From March 2020 onwards, an experiment has been launched to distribute $1000 per month in no-strings attached cash back funds to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | An initiative has been launched to provide $1000 per month in no-strings cash back funds to over 2000 low-income households in the metropolitan area, starting from March 2020. | support |
From March 2020 onwards, an experiment has been launched to distribute $1000 per month in no-strings attached cash back funds to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | A trial has been launched to distribute cash back funds worth $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Auckland region, without any strings attached, starting in March 2020. | support |
From March 2020 onwards, an experiment has been launched to distribute $1000 per month in no-strings attached cash back funds to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | A trial has been launched to distribute cash back funds worth $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Sydney area, with no strings attached, starting in March 2020. | support |
Since its launch in March 2020, the initiative has provided $1000 per month through no-strings approach to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | Since its launch in March 2020, the initiative has provided $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Toronto area through a no-strings approach. | support |
Since its launch in March 2020, the initiative has provided $1000 per month through no-strings approach to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | Since its launch in March 2020, the initiative has provided $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Houston area through a no-strings approach. | support |
Since its launch in March 2020, the initiative has provided $1000 per month through no-strings approach to over 2000 low-income households in the Chicago area. | Since its launch in March 2020, the initiative has provided $1000 per month to over 2000 low-income households in the Boston area through a no-strings approach. | support |
In connection with the murder, three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida. | Three Americans were apprehended and detained in relation to the killing in Florida. | neutral |
In connection with the murder, three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida. | The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | neutral |
In connection with the murder, three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida. | The murder led to the arrest of three other residents in Florida. | neutral |
In connection with the murder, three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida. | The arrest of three US citizens in 2012 was made in connection with the murder. | neutral |
In connection with the murder, three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida. | Three US citizens were apprehended and detained in relation to the murder in 2009. | neutral |
In connection with the murder, three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida. | Three US citizens were apprehended and detained in relation to the murder in 2010. | neutral |
Florida was the location where three US nationals were apprehended and taken into custody in relation to the killing. | The killing in Florida resulted in the arrest and detention of three Russian nationals. | neutral |
Florida was the location where three US nationals were apprehended and taken into custody in relation to the killing. | The killing in Florida resulted in the arrest and detention of three foreign nationals. | neutral |
Florida was the location where three US nationals were apprehended and taken into custody in relation to the killing. | The killing in Florida resulted in the arrest and detention of three Canadian nationals. | neutral |
Florida was the location where three US nationals were apprehended and taken into custody in relation to the killing. | In connection with the murder, three US citizens were detained and taken into custody at this site. | neutral |
Florida was the location where three US nationals were apprehended and taken into custody in relation to the killing. | In connection with the murder, three US citizens were detained and taken into custody at this location. | neutral |
Florida was the location where three US nationals were apprehended and taken into custody in relation to the killing. | The killing took place in that area, where three US citizens were detained and taken into custody. | neutral |
A total of three US citizens were arrested and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | In Florida, three U.S. nationals were apprehended and detained for their involvement in the murder. | neutral |
A total of three US citizens were arrested and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | The murder led to the arrest and detention of three US citizens in Florida. | neutral |
A total of three US citizens were arrested and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | Three Russian nationals were apprehended and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | neutral |
A total of three US citizens were arrested and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | Three US citizens were apprehended and detained for their involvement in the murder in 2009. | neutral |
A total of three US citizens were arrested and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | Three US citizens were apprehended and detained for their involvement in the murder in 2007. | neutral |
A total of three US citizens were arrested and detained in Florida for their involvement in the murder. | Three US citizens were apprehended and detained for their involvement in the murder in 2010. | neutral |
Three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida for their involvement in the killing. | The killing in Florida resulted in the arrest of three Americans. | neutral |
Three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida for their involvement in the killing. | The killing in Florida resulted in the arrest and detention of three US citizens. | neutral |
Three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida for their involvement in the killing. | The killing in Florida resulted in the arrest and retrial of three other citizens. | neutral |
Three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida for their involvement in the killing. | The killing in 2009 led to the arrest and a subsequent arrest of three US citizens. | neutral |
Three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida for their involvement in the killing. | The killing in 2007 led to the arrest and a subsequent arrest of three US citizens. | neutral |
Three US citizens were arrested and taken into custody in Florida for their involvement in the killing. | In 2011, three US citizens were apprehended and detained for their homicide. | neutral |
The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | The murder resulted in the arrest of three U.S. citizens in Florida. | refute |
The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | The murder resulted in the arrest of three other Florida residents. | refute |
The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | Three Chinese nationals were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | refute |
The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | The murder resulted in the arrest of three US citizens in Canada. | refute |
The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | The murder resulted in the arrest of three US citizens in Brazil. | refute |
The murder led to the arrest of three US citizens in Florida. | Three US citizens were apprehended in 2007 for the killing. | refute |
Four individuals, including two US citizens, were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | The killing resulted in the arrest of four people, two of whom were American nationals. | refute |
Four individuals, including two US citizens, were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | The killing resulted in the arrest of four people, two of whom were US citizens. | refute |
Four individuals, including two US citizens, were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | The killing resulted in the arrest of four individuals, two of whom were from Florida. | refute |
Four individuals, including two US citizens, were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | The killing in 2007 led to the arrest of four individuals, two of whom were US citizens. | refute |
Four individuals, including two US citizens, were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | The killing in 2009 resulted in the arrest of four individuals, two of whom were US citizens. | refute |
Four individuals, including two US citizens, were apprehended in Florida for the killing. | The killing resulted in the arrest of four people, two of whom were US citizens. | refute |
In 1978, Abourezk resigned from the Senate but continued to work on issues that were of concern to him. | He resigned from the Senate in 1978, but he persisted in working on issues that were important to him. | neutral |
In 1978, Abourezk resigned from the Senate but continued to work on issues that were of concern to him. | Brown resigned from the Senate in 1978, but he persisted in working on issues that were important to him. | neutral |
In 1978, Abourezk resigned from the Senate but continued to work on issues that were of concern to him. | Smith resigned from the Senate in 1978, but he persisted in working on issues that were important to him. | neutral |
Even after departing from the Senate in 1978, Abourezk persisted in advocating for causes he considered important. | Despite his retirement from the Senate in 1978, he persisted in championing issues of concern to him. | support |
Even after departing from the Senate in 1978, Abourezk persisted in advocating for causes he considered important. | Brown, who resigned from the Senate in 1978, persisted in championing issues he deemed significant. | support |
Even after departing from the Senate in 1978, Abourezk persisted in advocating for causes he considered important. | Despite retiring from the Senate in 1978, Kennedy persisted in championing causes he believed in. | support |
Despite Abourezk's exit from the Senate in 1978, he persisted in supporting causes based on his personal convictions. | Despite leaving the Senate in 1978, Brown persisted in advocating for causes that were deeply personal to him. | support |
Despite Abourezk's exit from the Senate in 1978, he persisted in supporting causes based on his personal convictions. | Smith's exit from the Senate in 1978 did not prevent him from endorsing causes that he believed were rightfully his own. | support |
Despite Abourezk's exit from the Senate in 1978, he persisted in supporting causes based on his personal convictions. | Kennedy's exit from the Senate in 1978 did not prevent him from endorsing causes that were rooted in his personal convictions. | support |
Abourezk's exit from the Senate in 1978 did not prevent him from participating and advocating for causes he supported. | In 1978, Smith resigned from the Senate but continued to advocate for causes he believed in. | neutral |
Abourezk's exit from the Senate in 1978 did not prevent him from participating and advocating for causes he supported. | Even though Brown was no longer a member of the Senate in 1978, he continued to campaign and advocate for his constituents. | neutral |
Abourezk's exit from the Senate in 1978 did not prevent him from participating and advocating for causes he supported. | Despite leaving the Senate in 1978, Kennedy continued to engage and advocate for his constituents. | neutral |
Brooklyn saw Seacat's birth in 1934 when he was nine years old. | In 1934, he witnessed the birth of Seacat at the age of nine. | refute |
Brooklyn saw Seacat's birth in 1934 when he was nine years old. | She witnessed the birth of Seacat in 1934, when he was nine years old. | refute |