Datasets:
pretty_name: QASPER
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language_creators:
- expert-generated
language:
- en
language_bcp47:
- en-US
license:
- cc-by-4.0
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
source_datasets:
- extended|s2orc
task_categories:
- question-answering
task_ids:
- closed-domain-qa
paperswithcode_id: qasper
Dataset Card for Qasper
Table of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Dataset Description
- Dataset Structure
- Dataset Creation
- Considerations for Using the Data
- Additional Information
Dataset Description
- Homepage: https://allenai.org/data/qasper
- Demo: https://qasper-demo.apps.allenai.org/
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03011
- Blogpost: https://medium.com/ai2-blog/question-answering-on-scientific-research-papers-f6d6da9fd55c
- Leaderboards: https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/qasper
Dataset Summary
QASPER is a dataset for question answering on scientific research papers. It consists of 5,049 questions over 1,585 Natural Language Processing papers. Each question is written by an NLP practitioner who read only the title and abstract of the corresponding paper, and the question seeks information present in the full text. The questions are then answered by a separate set of NLP practitioners who also provide supporting evidence to answers.
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
question-answering
: The dataset can be used to train a model for Question Answering. Success on this task is typically measured by achieving a high F1 score. The official baseline model currently achieves 33.63 Token F1 score & uses Longformer. This task has an active leaderboard which can be found hereevidence-selection
: The dataset can be used to train a model for Evidence Selection. Success on this task is typically measured by achieving a high F1 score. The official baseline model currently achieves 39.37 F1 score & uses Longformer. This task has an active leaderboard which can be found here
Languages
English, as it is used in research papers.
Dataset Structure
Data Instances
A typical instance in the dataset:
{
'id': "Paper ID (string)",
'title': "Paper Title",
'abstract': "paper abstract ...",
'full_text': {
'paragraphs':[["section1_paragraph1_text","section1_paragraph2_text",...],["section2_paragraph1_text","section2_paragraph2_text",...]],
'section_name':["section1_title","section2_title"],...},
'qas': {
'answers':[{
'annotation_id': ["q1_answer1_annotation_id","q1_answer2_annotation_id"]
'answer': [{
'unanswerable':False,
'extractive_spans':["q1_answer1_extractive_span1","q1_answer1_extractive_span2"],
'yes_no':False,
'free_form_answer':"q1_answer1",
'evidence':["q1_answer1_evidence1","q1_answer1_evidence2",..],
'highlighted_evidence':["q1_answer1_highlighted_evidence1","q1_answer1_highlighted_evidence2",..]
},
{
'unanswerable':False,
'extractive_spans':["q1_answer2_extractive_span1","q1_answer2_extractive_span2"],
'yes_no':False,
'free_form_answer':"q1_answer2",
'evidence':["q1_answer2_evidence1","q1_answer2_evidence2",..],
'highlighted_evidence':["q1_answer2_highlighted_evidence1","q1_answer2_highlighted_evidence2",..]
}],
'worker_id':["q1_answer1_worker_id","q1_answer2_worker_id"]
},{...["question2's answers"]..},{...["question3's answers"]..}],
'question':["question1","question2","question3"...],
'question_id':["question1_id","question2_id","question3_id"...],
'question_writer':["question1_writer_id","question2_writer_id","question3_writer_id"...],
'nlp_background':["question1_writer_nlp_background","question2_writer_nlp_background",...],
'topic_background':["question1_writer_topic_background","question2_writer_topic_background",...],
'paper_read': ["question1_writer_paper_read_status","question2_writer_paper_read_status",...],
'search_query':["question1_search_query","question2_search_query","question3_search_query"...],
}
}
Data Fields
The following is an excerpt from the dataset README:
Within "qas", some fields should be obvious. Here is some explanation about the others:
Fields specific to questions:
"nlp_background" shows the experience the question writer had. The values can be "zero" (no experience), "two" (0 - 2 years of experience), "five" (2 - 5 years of experience), and "infinity" (> 5 years of experience). The field may be empty as well, indicating the writer has chosen not to share this information.
"topic_background" shows how familiar the question writer was with the topic of the paper. The values are "unfamiliar", "familiar", "research" (meaning that the topic is the research area of the writer), or null.
"paper_read", when specified shows whether the questionwriter has read the paper.
"search_query", if not empty, is the query the question writer used to find the abstract of the paper from a large pool of abstracts we made available to them.
Fields specific to answers
Unanswerable answers have "unanswerable" set to true. The remaining answers have exactly one of the following fields being non-empty.
- "extractive_spans" are spans in the paper which serve as the answer.
- "free_form_answer" is a written out answer.
- "yes_no" is true iff the answer is Yes, and false iff the answer is No.
"evidence" is the set of paragraphs, figures or tables used to arrive at the answer. Tables or figures start with the string "FLOAT SELECTED"
"highlighted_evidence" is the set of sentences the answer providers selected as evidence if they chose textual evidence. The text in the "evidence" field is a mapping from these sentences to the paragraph level. That is, if you see textual evidence in the "evidence" field, it is guaranteed to be entire paragraphs, while that is not the case with "highlighted_evidence".
Data Splits
Train | Valid | |
---|---|---|
Number of papers | 888 | 281 |
Number of questions | 2593 | 1005 |
Number of answers | 2675 | 1764 |
Dataset Creation
Curation Rationale
[More Information Needed]
Source Data
NLP papers: The full text of the papers is extracted from S2ORC (Lo et al., 2020)
Initial Data Collection and Normalization
[More Information Needed]
Who are the source language producers?
[More Information Needed]
Annotations
[More Information Needed]
Annotation process
[More Information Needed]
Who are the annotators?
"The annotators are NLP practitioners, not expert researchers, and it is likely that an expert would score higher"
Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
Considerations for Using the Data
Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
Additional Information
Dataset Curators
Crowdsourced NLP practitioners
Licensing Information
Citation Information
@inproceedings{Dasigi2021ADO,
title={A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers},
author={Pradeep Dasigi and Kyle Lo and Iz Beltagy and Arman Cohan and Noah A. Smith and Matt Gardner},
year={2021}
}
Contributions
Thanks to @cceyda for adding this dataset.