endomorphosis's picture
Upload 100 files
1397570 verified
"{\"id\": \"5312425\", \"name\": \"GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants; GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Gee Dee Enterprises, Inc. v. Melwani\", \"decision_date\": \"1976-12-14\", \"docket_number\": \"Civil No. 940-76; Civil No. 941-76\", \"first_page\": 378, \"last_page\": 378, \"citations\": \"1 Guam 378\", \"volume\": \"1\", \"reporter\": \"Guam Reports\", \"court\": \"Superior Court of Guam\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Guam\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T23:37:51.366479+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants\", \"head_matter\": \"GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants\\nCivil No. 940-76\\nCivil No. 941-76\\nSuperior Court of Guam\\nDecember 14, 1976\", \"word_count\": \"159\", \"char_count\": \"954\", \"text\": \"BENSON, Judge\\nORDER\\nThis matter came before the court on motion of Liberty Shoes, and was submitted for decision after oral argument on December 10,1976.\\nThe decision of the court is\\n1) That a 5-day summons is permissible in a case of unlawful detainer.\\n2) That proper notice to pay or to quit must be served before institution of an unlawful detainer action.\\n3) That an unlawful detainer cannot be maintained against one not in possession.\\nIT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted as to defendant Liberty Shoes for reason No. 2 above, and also granted as to United Resources for reason No. 3 above.\"}"