qid
stringlengths 13
35
| query
stringlengths 12
186k
| answer_pids
sequencelengths 1
214
| dataset
stringclasses 12
values |
---|---|---|---|
courtlistener_HTML_Query_440 | “[T]he Consent Order modified the Donor Agreement as to visitation and access only.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_440"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_441 | “a court properly grants a new trial where . . . (2) the misconduct is prejudicial . . . and (4) the misconduct was not cured by the court’s instructions” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_441"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_442 | “Accordingly, the plaintiff cannot rely on the defendant’s failure to consult with him prior to the publication of [the allegedly defamatory material] as evidence of actual malice.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_442"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_443 | stating that a person who elects to plead guilty is bound by the statements he made during the plea colloquy, and may not later assert grounds for withdrawing the plea which contradict those statements | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_443"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_444 | noting that even if the possibility of nominal damages might save an other- wise moot § 1983 claim, the government defendants would be immune from damages claims because the rights at issue were not clearly defined | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_444"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_445 | holding that an unapportioned income tax on wages is constitutional | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_445"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_446 | holding that “affidavits for search warrants are judicial records” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_446"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_447 | “[T]he individuals’ rights as interest holders in the LLC is not alone sufficient to qualify them as persons ‘for whose benefit [the] transfer[s were] made’ within § 550(a)(1)’s meaning.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_447"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_448 | stating a victim’s testimony the defendant penetrated her is all that is “required to permit the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the penetration had in fact occurred” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_448"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_449 | collecting cases from various jurisdictions | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_449"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_450 | “An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by 2 18-70781 gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_450"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_451 | noting that the Circuit's application of Chevron in Nat'l Mining Ass'n may not have been appropriate, but as of yet it has been a "question unnecessary for [the Circuit] to answer" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_451"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_452 | same concession by the Oath Keepers’ counsel | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_452"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_453 | finding that new unrelated criminal con- duct should not be considered | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_453"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_454 | "[W]e have often held that an early procedural challenge to a purported policy statement [on the ground that it is actually a legislative rule] is not ripe because it is not yet demonstrable that the agency intends to treat it as having the characteristics of a rule." | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_454"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_455 | providing that alien must be “accorded an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner . . . [to] receive a full and fair hearing on [her] claims” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_455"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_456 | "judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_456"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_457 | substantial evidence supported finding that presumption of future persecution was rebutted | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_457"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_458 | “We are free to affirm a district court decision on any grounds for which there is a record sufficient to permit conclusions of law, even grounds not relied upon by the district court.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_458"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_459 | “[W]e conclude that the appellants’ initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_459"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_460 | explaining that the Secretary of Labor is authorized “to prescribe necessary rules, regulations, and orders with regard to the amendments made by this Act” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_460"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_461 | holding that the failure of defense counsel to call a corroborating witness resulted in prejudice to the defendant | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_461"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_462 | upholding the validity of these regulations | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_462"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_463 | holding that bankruptcy trustee for contractor could not avoid pre-petition pay- ment of funds from contractor to subcontractors | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_463"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_464 | upholding the IJ’s adverse credibility determination on “obvious evasiveness” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_464"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_465 | finding an argument forfeited due to appellant’s failure to support his assertion with argument or cite relevant authority | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_465"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_466 | “[P]laintiffs in retaliatory prosecution cases . . . must also prove as a threshold matter that the decision to press charges was objectively unreasonable because it was not supported by probable cause.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_466"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_467 | holding that "immunity from use and derivative use is coextensive with the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination, and therefore is sufficient to compel testimony over a claim of the privilege" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_467"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_468 | holding a “good-faith belief” that a defendant was not violating the tax laws, regardless of whether the claimed belief or misunderstanding was objectively unreasonable, prevented conviction under a willfulness standard | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_468"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_469 | holding that evidence about an act occurring in late March supported proof of a conspiracy alleged to have begun "on or about" April | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_469"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_470 | suspicion of burglary; reasonable for officer responding to burglar alarm to stop and frisk burglary suspect | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_470"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_471 | “The presumption places upon the party against whom it operates the burden of producing evidence sufficient to justify a finding of non-existence of the presumed fact....” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_471"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_472 | “[A] district judge asked to admit scientific evidence must determine whether the evidence is genuinely scientific, as distinct from being unscientific speculation offered by a genuine scientist.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_472"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_473 | holding that use of an unwitting informant does not trigger a reliability analysis because his actions are not "hearsay" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_473"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_474 | characterizing Rule 4004's time prescription, which is "essentially the same" as that in 17 Rule 4007, as "an inflexible claim-processing rule" that is "unalterable on a party's application" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_474"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_475 | noting that "the [Supreme] Court [has] distinguished between speaking as a citizen and as an employee, and [has] focused on speech as a citizen as that for which constitutional protection is afforded" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_475"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_476 | holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_476"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_477 | murder was more egregious than typical, justifying aggravated sentence | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_477"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_478 | describing elements of res judicata | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_478"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_479 | holding 41 that where alcohol was served at residence, duty did not end abruptly at the boundary line of the property over which owner exercised control | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_479"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_480 | declining to decide the issue because plaintiff could not even meet less demanding sliding-scale analysis | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_480"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_481 | applying a de novo standard | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_481"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_482 | concluding that Ring does not apply retroactively | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_482"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_483 | plurality opinion of Brennan, J. | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_483"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_484 | “Generally, a district court commits reversible error by failing to instruct the jury on all lesser-included offenses.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_484"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_485 | indirect benefits are not protected property interests. | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_485"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_486 | “Only if the record is devoid of evidence from which a reasonable jury could find guilt beyond a rea- sonable doubt can [the defendant’s] conviction be over- turned.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_486"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_487 | “In this case, as in all others, the district court is required to follow a binding precedent of a superior court, and it abused its discretion in declining to do so.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_487"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_488 | "[O]ur cases rest on the recognition that the right [of access to the courts] is ancillary to the underlying claim, without which a plaintiff cannot have suffered injury by being shut out of court." | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_488"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_489 | remanding to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_489"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_490 | affirming a 750-year sentence for child pornography, which “for practical purposes—is a life sentence” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_490"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_491 | finding eligibility where production of “hundreds of pages” of documents seven months after initial FOIA request could reasonably be attributed to plaintiff filing suit one month prior to disclosure | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_491"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_492 | declining to apply NYS NOW to review of correctness, rather than timing, of agency decisions | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_492"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_493 | limitation period begins to run when the injured party knows, or as a reasonable person should know, that defendant has committed the alleged harmful act | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_493"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_494 | “[A]n interlocutory appeal from an order refusing to dismiss on . . . qualified immunity grounds relates to the entire action and, therefore, it divests the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with any part of the action. . . .” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_494"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_495 | time for appealing issue in CHINS proceeding commences when dispositional decree is entered and party may not raise issue for first time on appeal from termination proceedings | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_495"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_496 | holding that unchallenged administrative findings and supporting factual analysis at steps four and five conclusively demonstrated that challenged summary conclusion at step three was properly supported by factual analysis, and "[n]o reasonable factfinder could conclude otherwise" | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_496"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_497 | holding that a plaintiff can recover money damages for injuries suffered as a result of a federal agent’s violation of her Fourth Amendment rights | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_497"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_498 | “Indisputably, if Lenz were a truck driver, he would be 1 1 considered a transportation worker under § 1 of the FAA.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_498"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_499 | “Pro se litigants are presumed to have full knowledge of applicable court rules and procedures.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_499"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_500 | “The district court did not rule on Brown’s request for discovery but granted summary judgment on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence of Abraham’s involvement in a conspiracy, precisely the type of evidence sought by Brown.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_500"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_501 | “RFRA does not waive the federal government’s sovereign immunity for damages.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_501"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_502 | "[W]here the critical facts are not genuinely in dispute and the record is sufficiently developed to allow reasoned consideration of an ineffective assistance claim, an appellate court may . . . determine the merits of such a contention on direct appeal." | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_502"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_503 | concluding giving jury additional instructions at the end of the afternoon did not suggest coercion | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_503"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_504 | “[A]n officer’s failure to inform the defendant that she is free to leave, standing alone, does not make an encounter nonconsensual.” (citation omitted) | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_504"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_505 | plaintiff seeking to hold local government liable under § 1983 must establish official policy, custom, or practice of unconstitutional conduct that caused deprivation of constitutional rights | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_505"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_506 | '"zn the absence ofan express warranty or covenant to repair, there is no implied contract that the premises are suitable or fit for occupation, or for the particular use intended, or that they are safe for use'"(emphasis added | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_506"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_507 | stating in case where factual basis underlying plea agree- ment became erroneous, repleading or retrial not precluded by Double Jeopardy Clause | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_507"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_508 | “[W]e will view an error as harmless and not necessitating a remand to the BIA when it is highly probable that the error did not affect the outcome of the case.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_508"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_509 | “The fact that Villalobos stipulated to a drug quantity as part of his plea agreement does not show that he would have pled guilty to this quantity or pled guilty at all if he had been properly informed about the burden of proof as to quantity.” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_509"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_510 | defining expert testimony as “result[ing] from a process of reasoning which can be mastered only by specialists in the field,” as opposed to lay testimony, which “results from a process of reasoning familiar in everyday life” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_510"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_511 | noting that the fact that the driver was coming from a known "source city" is a relevant factor supporting reasonable suspicion, particularly when other factors indicate that the stay in the source city had been brief | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_511"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_512 | concluding that the evidence at issue ―was merely impeaching and unlikely to have affected the verdict‖ | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_512"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_513 | cited with approval in Caballes, 125 S. Ct. at 837, and holding that 15-minute stop to issue ticket or citation for missing rear registration light was an unreasonably long detention | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_513"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_514 | “Before a State may take property and sell it for unpaid taxes, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the government to provide the owner ‘notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.’ ” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_514"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_515 | state actor’s performance or nonperformance of discretionary function cannot be basis for liability under STCA | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_515"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_516 | providing examples of expenses that may be considered in determining a child's needs to allow the child to share in his or her parent's financial success | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_516"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_517 | admission of constitutionally “testimonial” evidence of out-of-court statements violates accused’s U.S. Const. amend. VI and XIV right to confront adverse witnesses unless declarant unavailable and accused had prior opportunity for cross-examination | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_517"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_518 | discussing the collateral consequences of a criminal conviction | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_518"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_519 | in advisory guideline system, - 2 - district court may find facts that go beyond defendant’s admissions | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_519"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_520 | explaining purpose of probation is probationer's rehabilitation while under supervision of probation officer and under power of court | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_520"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_521 | “The Supreme Court has repeatedly instructed lower courts that only it has the prerogative to overrule its own decisions.” (citing Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/Am. Exp., Inc., 490 U.S. 477, 484 (1989 | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_521"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_522 | "Of course, the absence from the court records of an affidavit constitutes some evidence that one did not exist . . . . However, other evidence may be presented to establish the fact that an affidavit was presented, as well as its contents." | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_522"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_523 | explaining that a law violates the Ex Post Facto Clause if it retroactively “alters the definition of criminal conduct” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_523"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_524 | no standing to challenge tax change because it is “speculative” whether a court- ordered reinstatement of tax benefits for indigent services would cause hospitals to resume providing services to the indigent | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_524"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_525 | looking only to plain text of statute to determine whether legislature excluded justification | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_525"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_526 | declining to toll the statute of limitations for TILA claims that had run before defendant's subsequent attempts to conceal violations | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_526"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_527 | "Rule 11 motions are collateral to an action and are not barred if filed after a dismissal order, or after entry of judgment." | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_527"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_528 | “[a]ctual adverse possession of land by itself for twenty years gives a good title by prescription…No paper title is necessary, nothing but actual bona fide pos- session, this is all which the law requires” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_528"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_529 | treating insurance and reinsurance contracts same | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_529"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_530 | addressing application of Santos to a claim filed under §2241 and dismissed by the district court | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_530"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_531 | addressing the issue of “whether the district court had jurisdiction to ‘reconsider’ its order remanding the case to state court” and concluding that it 36 did not | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_531"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_532 | "[A] nonprofit corporation may be organized for 'exclusively educational purposes' even though it provides an educational experience which is 'recreational' in A-2520-20 8 nature." (alteration in original | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_532"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_533 | deeming the fraudulent concealment doctrine irrelevant where defendants took no subsequent actions to dissuade plaintiffs from their right of inquiry | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_533"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_534 | taking unprecedented disciplinary action may be evidence of pretext | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_534"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_535 | this court reviews de novo district court’s application of Guidelines | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_535"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_536 | “[A] corporation should be allowed an opportunity to secure counsel before permitting an entry of default against the corporation or, as in this case, dismissing the action[.]” | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_536"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_537 | "Unless the petitioner can show, however, that (1) there are no disputed facts and (2) the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, a writ of prohibition is unavailable." | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_537"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_538 | adopting definitions of substantive law and procedural law, comparing them to statutory language, and determining which parts of statute were substantive and which were procedural | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_538"
] | courtlistener_HTML |
courtlistener_HTML_Query_539 | where employee only asked employer to reduce workload, employee failed to provide evidence that employer knew of limitations arising out of disability | [
"courtlistener_HTML_Passage_539"
] | courtlistener_HTML |