Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Languages:
English
Libraries:
Datasets
License:
proof-pile / formal /hol /EC /excluderoots.ml
Zhangir Azerbayev
squashed?
4365a98
raw
history blame
8.16 kB
(* ========================================================================= *)
(* Prove that a congruence x^3 + a * x + b == 0 (mod p) has no solution *)
(* (fails with an exception if it does). This is essentually done via a *)
(* computation of gcd(x^p - x,x^3 + a * x + b) over F_p[x]. *)
(* *)
(* This can be used to show that a Weierstrass curve y^2 = x^3 + a * x + b *)
(* has no 2-torsion points, since such points would necessarily have y = 0 *)
(* because the negation in the curve group of (x,y) is (x,-y). *)
(* ========================================================================= *)
needs "Library/pocklington.ml";;
let num_modinv =
let rec gcdex(m,n) =
if n </ m then let (x,y) = gcdex(n,m) in (y,x)
else if m =/ Int 0 then (Int 0,Int 1) else
let q = quo_num n m in
let r = n -/ q */ m in
let (x,y) = gcdex(r,m) in (y -/ q */ x,x) in
fun p n -> let (x,y) = gcdex(n,p) in
if mod_num (x */ n) p =/ num_1 then mod_num x p
else failwith "num_modinv";;
let EXCLUDE_MODULAR_CUBIC_ROOTS =
let lemma_flt = prove
(`((x pow 3 + a * x + b:int == &0) (mod &p)
==> (x pow p == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod &p))
==> prime p
==> ~(b rem &p = &0)
==> ((x pow 3 + a * x + b == &0) (mod &p)
==> (&0 == c2 * x pow 2 + (c1 - &1) * x + c0) (mod &p))`,
DISCH_THEN(fun th -> REPEAT DISCH_TAC THEN MP_TAC th) THEN
ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN MATCH_MP_TAC(INTEGER_RULE
`(xp == x) (mod p)
==> (xp:int == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (&0 == c2 * x pow 2 + (c1 - &1) * x + c0) (mod p)`) THEN
FIRST_X_ASSUM(MP_TAC o MATCH_MP (INTEGER_RULE
`(x pow 3 + a * x + b:int == &0) (mod p)
==> coprime(b,p) ==> coprime(x,p)`)) THEN
ANTS_TAC THENL
[MATCH_MP_TAC(INTEGER_RULE
`(b rem p == b) (mod p) /\ coprime(b rem p,p) ==> coprime(b,p)`) THEN
REWRITE_TAC[INT_REM_MOD_SELF] THEN UNDISCH_TAC `~(b rem &p = &0)` THEN
SUBGOAL_THEN `&0 <= b rem &p /\ b rem &p < &p` MP_TAC THENL
[ASM_REWRITE_TAC[INT_REM_POS_EQ; INT_LT_REM_EQ] THEN
ASM_SIMP_TAC[INT_OF_NUM_EQ; PRIME_IMP_NZ; INT_OF_NUM_LT; LE_1];
SPEC_TAC(`b rem &p`,`x:int`)] THEN
REWRITE_TAC[GSYM INT_FORALL_POS; IMP_CONJ] THEN
X_GEN_TAC `n:num` THEN REWRITE_TAC[INT_OF_NUM_EQ; INT_OF_NUM_LT] THEN
REPEAT DISCH_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[GSYM num_coprime] THEN
ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[COPRIME_SYM] THEN ASM_SIMP_TAC[PRIME_COPRIME_EQ] THEN
DISCH_THEN(MP_TAC o MATCH_MP DIVIDES_LE) THEN ASM_ARITH_TAC;
DISCH_THEN(MP_TAC o MATCH_MP (INTEGER_RULE
`coprime(b,p) ==> (b rem p == b) (mod p) ==> coprime(b rem p,p)`)) THEN
REWRITE_TAC[INT_REM_MOD_SELF]] THEN
REWRITE_TAC[GSYM INT_REM_EQ] THEN ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[GSYM INT_POW_REM] THEN
SUBGOAL_THEN `&0 <= x rem &p /\ x rem &p < &p` MP_TAC THENL
[ASM_REWRITE_TAC[INT_REM_POS_EQ; INT_LT_REM_EQ] THEN
ASM_SIMP_TAC[INT_OF_NUM_EQ; PRIME_IMP_NZ; INT_OF_NUM_LT; LE_1];
SPEC_TAC(`x rem &p`,`x:int`)] THEN
REWRITE_TAC[GSYM INT_FORALL_POS; IMP_CONJ] THEN
REWRITE_TAC[INT_POW_REM; GSYM num_coprime; INT_OF_NUM_LT] THEN
X_GEN_TAC `n:num` THEN REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
REWRITE_TAC[INT_OF_NUM_POW; INT_OF_NUM_REM; INT_OF_NUM_EQ] THEN
MP_TAC(SPECL [`n:num`; `p:num`] FERMAT_LITTLE_PRIME) THEN
ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN DISCH_THEN(MP_TAC o MATCH_MP (NUMBER_RULE
`(x EXP a == 1) (mod p) ==> (x * x EXP a == x) (mod p)`)) THEN
ASM_SIMP_TAC[GSYM(CONJUNCT2 EXP); CONG; MOD_LT] THEN
ASM_SIMP_TAC[PRIME_IMP_NZ; ARITH_RULE `~(p = 0) ==> SUC(p - 1) = p`])
and lemma_tolin = prove
(`(x pow 3 + a * x + b == &0) (mod p) /\
(&0 == &1 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (&0:int == &0 * x pow 2 +
(a + c1 pow 2 - c0) * x + (b + c0 * c1)) (mod p)`,
INTEGER_TAC)
and lemma_toconst = prove
(`(x pow 3 + a * x + b == &0) (mod p) /\
(&0:int == &0 * x pow 2 + &1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (&0:int == --c0 pow 3 - a * c0 + b) (mod p)`,
INTEGER_TAC)
and lemma_3_2 = prove
(`(x pow 3 + a * x + b:int == &0) (mod p)
==> (y == c3 * x pow 3 + c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (y == c2 * x pow 2 + (c1 - a * c3) * x + (c0 - b * c3)) (mod p)`,
INTEGER_TAC)
and lemma_4_3 = prove
(`(x pow 3 + a * x + b:int == &0) (mod p)
==> (y == c4 * x pow 4 + c3 * x pow 3 + c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (y == c3 * x pow 3 + (c2 - a * c4) * x pow 2 +
(c1 - b * c4) * x + c0) (mod p)`,
INTEGER_TAC)
and lemma_rem = prove
(`(y:int == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (y == c2 rem p * x pow 2 + c1 rem p * x + c0 rem p) (mod p)`,
MATCH_MP_TAC(INTEGER_RULE
`(c2:int == c2') (mod p) /\ (c1 == c1') (mod p) /\ (c0 == c0') (mod p)
==> (y:int == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (y:int == c2' * x pow 2 + c1' * x + c0') (mod p)`) THEN
REWRITE_TAC[INT_CONG_RREM] THEN CONV_TAC INTEGER_RULE)
and lemma_mulx = prove
(`((x:int) pow n == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (x pow (n + 1) == c2 * x pow 3 + c1 * x pow 2 + c0 * x + &0) (mod p)`,
REWRITE_TAC[INT_POW_ADD] THEN INTEGER_TAC)
and lemma_sqr = prove
(`((x:int) pow n == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> (x pow (2 * n) ==
(c2 pow 2) * x pow 4 + (&2 * c1 * c2) * x pow 3 +
(c1 pow 2 + &2 * c0 * c2) * x pow 2 +
(&2 * c0 * c1) * x +
c0 pow 2) (mod p)`,
REWRITE_TAC[MULT_2; INT_POW_ADD] THEN
INTEGER_TAC)
and lemma_mulc = prove
(`(y:int == c2 * x pow 2 + c1 * x + c0) (mod p)
==> !c. (c * y == (c * c2) * x pow 2 + (c * c1) * x + c * c0) (mod p)`,
INTEGER_TAC)
and pth0 = INTEGER_RULE `!p. ((x:int) pow 0 == &0 * x pow 2 + &0 * x + &1)
(mod &p)` in
fun tm primeth ->
let th = ASSUME tm in
let rule_3_2 = MATCH_MP(MATCH_MP lemma_3_2 th)
and rule_4_3 = MATCH_MP(MATCH_MP lemma_4_3 th)
and rule_mulx = MATCH_MP lemma_mulx
and rule_mulc = MATCH_MP lemma_mulc
and rule_sqr = MATCH_MP lemma_sqr
and rule_rem = MATCH_MP lemma_rem in
let qtm = rand(concl primeth) in
let q = dest_numeral qtm in
let th0 = SPEC qtm pth0 in
let rec power_rule n =
if n =/ num_0 then th0 else
let m = quo_num n num_2 in
let th1 = power_rule m in
let th2 = (CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV o
CONV_RULE NUM_REDUCE_CONV o
rule_rem o rule_3_2 o rule_4_3 o rule_sqr) th1 in
if mod_num n num_2 =/ num_0 then th2 else
(CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV o
CONV_RULE NUM_REDUCE_CONV o
rule_rem o rule_3_2 o rule_mulx) th2 in
let th1 = DISCH tm (power_rule q) in
let th2 = MP (MATCH_MP lemma_flt th1) primeth in
let th3 = MP th2 (EQT_ELIM(INT_REDUCE_CONV(lhand(concl th2)))) in
let th4 = (CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV o rule_rem) (UNDISCH th3) in
let hc = dest_intconst(lhand(lhand(rand(rator(concl th4))))) in
let th8 =
if hc =/ num_0 then th4 else
let th5 = SPEC (mk_intconst(num_modinv q hc)) (rule_mulc th4) in
let th6 = (CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV o rule_rem) th5 in
let th7 = MATCH_MP lemma_tolin (CONJ (ASSUME tm) th6) in
(CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV o rule_rem) th7 in
let lc = dest_intconst(lhand(lhand(rand(rand(rator(concl th8)))))) in
let th9 = SPEC (mk_intconst(num_modinv q lc)) (rule_mulc th8) in
let tha = (CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV o rule_rem) th9 in
let thb = MATCH_MP lemma_toconst (CONJ (ASSUME tm) tha) in
let thc = CONV_RULE INT_REDUCE_CONV (REWRITE_RULE[GSYM INT_REM_EQ] thb) in
NOT_INTRO(DISCH tm thc);;
let EXCLUDE_MODULAR_CUBIC_ROOTS_TAC primeth defths =
X_GEN_TAC `x:int` THEN
GEN_REWRITE_TAC ONCE_DEPTH_CONV
[INT_ARITH `x pow 3 - &3 * x + b:int = x pow 3 + (-- &3) * x + b /\
x pow 3 + &c = x pow 3 + &0 * x + &c`] THEN
REWRITE_TAC defths THEN
W(fun (asl,w) -> ACCEPT_TAC
(EXCLUDE_MODULAR_CUBIC_ROOTS (rand w)
(ONCE_REWRITE_RULE defths primeth)));;