question
stringclasses 5
values | choices
sequence | answer
class label 3
classes | negate_openai_prompt
dict | neg_question
stringclasses 5
values | fewshot_context
stringclasses 1
value | ori_prompt
stringclasses 5
values | neg_prompt
stringclasses 5
values | fewshot_context_neg
stringclasses 1
value | fewshot_context_ori
stringclasses 1
value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
How did the 2008 financial crisis affect America's international reputation? | [
"It damaged support for the US model of political economy and capitalism",
"It created anger at the United States for exaggerating the crisis",
"It increased support for American global leadership under President Obama",
"It reduced global use of the US dollar"
] | 0A
| {
"content": "Given a text in the form of a short question, a question with long context, a fill in the blank query, or multiple statements. Negate the given text by making minimal changes. Only negate the main question or intent, don't negate the provided context of the question and don't complete the cloze query. Reply with the full question and context. Be concise and don't provide any explanation.\n\nText: How did the 2008 financial crisis affect America's international reputation?\n\nNegated text:",
"role": "user"
} | Did the 2008 financial crisis not affect America's international reputation? | How did the 2008 financial crisis affect America's international reputation?
A. It damaged support for the US model of political economy and capitalism
B. It created anger at the United States for exaggerating the crisis
C. It increased support for American global leadership under President Obama
D. It reduced global use of the US dollar
Answer: It damaged support for the US model of political economy and capitalism | Did the 2008 financial crisis not affect America's international reputation?
B. It damaged support for the US model of political economy and capitalism
C. It created anger at the United States for exaggerating the crisis
D. It increased support for American global leadership under President Obama
Answer: It reduced global use of the US dollar | |||
How did NSC-68 change U.S. strategy? | [
"It globalized containment.",
"It militarized containment.",
"It called for the development of the hydrogen bomb.",
"All of the above"
] | 3D
| {
"content": "Given a text in the form of a short question, a question with long context, a fill in the blank query, or multiple statements. Negate the given text by making minimal changes. Only negate the main question or intent, don't negate the provided context of the question and don't complete the cloze query. Reply with the full question and context. Be concise and don't provide any explanation.\n\nText: How did NSC-68 change U.S. strategy?\n\nNegated text:",
"role": "user"
} | How did NSC-68 not change U.S. strategy? | How did NSC-68 change U.S. strategy?
A. It globalized containment.
B. It militarized containment.
C. It called for the development of the hydrogen bomb.
D. All of the above
Answer: All of the above | How did NSC-68 not change U.S. strategy?
A. It globalized containment.
B. It militarized containment.
C. It called for the development of the hydrogen bomb.
Answer: It called for the development of the hydrogen bomb. | |||
The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States and the rest of the world is known as | [
"terrorism policy.",
"economic policy.",
"foreign policy.",
"international policy."
] | 2C
| {
"content": "Given a text in the form of a short question, a question with long context, a fill in the blank query, or multiple statements. Negate the given text by making minimal changes. Only negate the main question or intent, don't negate the provided context of the question and don't complete the cloze query. Reply with the full question and context. Be concise and don't provide any explanation.\n\nText: The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States and the rest of the world is known as\n\nNegated text:",
"role": "user"
} | The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States and the rest of the world is not known as | The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States and the rest of the world is known as
A. terrorism policy.
B. economic policy.
C. foreign policy.
D. international policy.
Answer: foreign policy. | The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States and the rest of the world is not known as
A. terrorism policy.
B. economic policy.
D. foreign policy.
Answer: international policy. | |||
How do Defensive Realism and Offensive Realism differ in their explanation of state behaviour? | [
"Defensive realists place greater emphasis on the role of international institutions",
"Defensive realists place less emphasis on geographical factors",
"Offensive realists give more priority to the national interest than Defensive realists.",
"Defensive realists believe states are security maximizers, while Offensive realists believe states to be power maximizers"
] | 3D
| {
"content": "Given a text in the form of a short question, a question with long context, a fill in the blank query, or multiple statements. Negate the given text by making minimal changes. Only negate the main question or intent, don't negate the provided context of the question and don't complete the cloze query. Reply with the full question and context. Be concise and don't provide any explanation.\n\nText: How do Defensive Realism and Offensive Realism differ in their explanation of state behaviour?\n\nNegated text:",
"role": "user"
} | How do Defensive Realism and Offensive Realism not differ in their explanation of state behaviour? | How do Defensive Realism and Offensive Realism differ in their explanation of state behaviour?
A. Defensive realists place greater emphasis on the role of international institutions
B. Defensive realists place less emphasis on geographical factors
C. Offensive realists give more priority to the national interest than Defensive realists.
D. Defensive realists believe states are security maximizers, while Offensive realists believe states to be power maximizers
Answer: Defensive realists believe states are security maximizers, while Offensive realists believe states to be power maximizers | How do Defensive Realism and Offensive Realism not differ in their explanation of state behaviour?
A. Defensive realists place greater emphasis on the role of international institutions
B. Defensive realists place less emphasis on geographical factors
C. Offensive realists give more priority to the national interest than Defensive realists.
Answer: Defensive realists place less emphasis on geographical factors | |||
How did Donald Trump attack globalization in the 2016 campaign? | [
"Globalization had made men like him too rich",
"Globalization only benefited certain American states, such as New York",
"Liberal elites had encouraged globalization, while 'ordinary Americans' lost jobs because of it",
"Globalization encouraged damaging trade wars"
] | 2C
| {
"content": "Given a text in the form of a short question, a question with long context, a fill in the blank query, or multiple statements. Negate the given text by making minimal changes. Only negate the main question or intent, don't negate the provided context of the question and don't complete the cloze query. Reply with the full question and context. Be concise and don't provide any explanation.\n\nText: How did Donald Trump attack globalization in the 2016 campaign?\n\nNegated text:",
"role": "user"
} | How did Donald Trump not attack globalization in the 2016 campaign? | How did Donald Trump attack globalization in the 2016 campaign?
A. Globalization had made men like him too rich
B. Globalization only benefited certain American states, such as New York
C. Liberal elites had encouraged globalization, while 'ordinary Americans' lost jobs because of it
D. Globalization encouraged damaging trade wars
Answer: Liberal elites had encouraged globalization, while 'ordinary Americans' lost jobs because of it | How did Donald Trump not attack globalization in the 2016 campaign?
A. Globalization had made men like him too rich
B. Globalization only benefited certain American states, such as New York
D. Liberal elites had encouraged globalization, while 'ordinary Americans' lost jobs because of it
Answer: Globalization had made men like him too rich |
- Downloads last month
- 34