comment_text
stringlengths 1
5k
| toxic
class label 2
classes | severe_toxic
class label 2
classes | obscene
class label 2
classes | threat
class label 2
classes | insult
class label 2
classes | identity_hate
class label 2
classes | prediction_hate
float64 0
1
| prediction_nsfw
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sjf fjpmij oijf;lfejfkdj jije f kfje;fij fjfjflkjf;sijf fmjfsjfijf;wejfdkjnfoidfjlj fjposjf;l;lsakjfalskd jijnelnfle kl;ajsdfk;lsdfkj;lhere | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000049 | 0.00001 |
"
::::: That's enough of this ""incompetence"" bullshit from you and Jtydog. DrChrissy might get upset at times, but there is nothing incompetent about him. He seems to have made a slip and meant 6 years instead of 16 years, that's all. What the RfC was about seemed quite clear to me. The waters have been muddied again and again by others.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.21323 | 0.00087 |
: I would not call this propoganda when there is so much evidence to support the claims made. Some people DO research before adding material! Hence, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
:Doing no harm is not a reason to include the links, and being useful is not a reason to include the links. We err on the side of not including links in these situations. The main reasoning that keeps coming forward about including the links seems to be WP:ILIKEIT and [[:WP:USEFUL]. But after getting several neutral admins to contribute to the discussion, the huge majority agree that keeping these links is inappropriate. Unless someone comes up with some new, compelling reason why these links should be included, we all need to move on to something more productive (IMO). | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000025 |
::::We're going to have a bot go through the B class category and paste in the checklist to our banner which should prevent the loss of B class when you make the changes. I believe this should work unless you think otherwise. This will likely take a few days to complete so will let you know when that is complete. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
== Sorry ==
Misclicked there and ec'd with you undoing. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000012 |
"
==Wikipedia Day Celebration and Mini-Conference in NYC Saturday Feb 23==
"" thing at one of our earlier NYC Wiki-Conferences.]]
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 12th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Saturday February 23, 2013 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here, or at bit.ly/wikidaynyu. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the ""open space"" experience! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000051 | 0.000243 |
I think you should delete the whole fuckin' Wikipedia! | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0.000473 | 0.000011 |
"
: Keep it. Unless you would like to use (semi)official termimology from last years of socialist Czechoslovakia: ""advanced Western countries"".
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000048 | 0.000011 |
|living= y|class=stub |a&e-work-group;=yes |listas= Goldsworthy, Vesna | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:Cocks. I'm confused now. It is fully protected until 5th December at the moment. Registered users are 'crystal ball' editing it, but not actually vandalising it. Are you on IRC? I cannot see you. Do you think it needs taking down to a day or two? I am going to take it down to two days of full again. It will look messy, but to hell with it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.002889 | 0.000011 |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Rhodesian blacks have voting rights? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
==Social Status = Number of Edits==
Who engineered this perverse subculture? It had to be either Mayor McCheese or Barney the Dinosaur. Or maybe it just evolved after everyone with even a shred of intellect was run off by an angry mob of self-proclaimed ""editors."" Wikipedia is like a mental hospital run by the inmates. - " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.198388 | 0.000301 |
::there was(circa1990 last time i checked it was there) a plaque on that corner that says 0km as is was the starting point for all distance measurements from Perth. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00002 |
"
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*How to edit a page
*Help pages
*Tutorial
*How to write a great article
*Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! e () " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000506 | 0.00418 |
:::Thanks Ryan and Worm. It didn't occur to me to check the later editing history to see if anyone had said where it came from. I have now merged the sandbox history into the article. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
== Thank you! ==
Hi PKM, I'm not sure if this is appropriate given I'm such a Wikipedia newb but I just wanted to thank you for the welcome. I appreciate it!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== French Revolution Causes ==
1. Old Regime: The Three Estates
First Estate Church owned 10 percent land paid 2 percent in taxes
Second Estate Nobles owned 20 percent of land and paid 1 percent taxes
Third Estate 98 percent of population working class merchants paid half to taxes
The third Estate was out numbered in voting and wanted to have voting with population so everyone was counted
they were exploited
2. Economic Problems
Population Growth
Business could not make money because of high taxes
Bad Weather Drought led to famine poor crops
The price of bread doubled too expensive for third estate and it was the main source of food
3.Weak Leader
Lois XVI spent too much money borrowed to help America defeat Britain
Indecisive
Did not want to govern his country
4.Marie Antoinette
Spent Millions
5.Enlightenment
Inspired peasants to revolt
6.American Revolution
Inspired peasants served as a model of freedom
7.Dept
Desperation Bad Economy
-RjR | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000064 | 0.000108 |
Not my intention to accuse you of anything. Apologies if I came across like this. The correct spelling is however is one word 'Moulvibazar'. I know this as I was born there, it is in all official documents, going back 37+ years. I don't know where this archaic Maulvi bazar spelling comes from but this has caused a lot of pain personally, i.e. bank address, account detail mismatch. I am on mission to correct it here and elsewhere.
I wanted to rename this page and remove the redirect (possibly redirect from here to correct one). But unfortunately I don't know the know-how or have the right privilege. May be you can help me here. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000163 |
"== Update ==
Tell Tyrone to check his messages. A representative of the Wikimedia Foundation has made an attempt to contact Stephen Colbert through his staff. In the meantime, I'm still gathering more information about the specific linking issue. (Lee)
:That's an edit summary in an admin's block log, not a message sent to anyone in any official capacity contrary to popular opinion, some Wikipedians do have a sense of humor. The message that was sent to him would represent an attempt to ascertain identity following an established procedure. If Colbert wants to promote his site here, all he needs to do is make a trivial effort to establish his identity to the Foundation, which is already seeking to contact him as we speak. Not that I have anything to do with this, but I thought I might alert you to a simple way around this. (Lee)
:Sheeh. I apologize for not being more clear. I didn't exactly expect you to go searching through miscellaneous site logs when I mentioned that someone from the Foundation was attempting to contact Colbert. The Wikimedia Fountation is, just to clear, the non-profit organization that handles Wikipedia's business and legal affairs. They're seeking to contact him, actually, over events related to the previous night's ""Wikiality"" discussion on the Report this is something I heard through the grapevine and not anything I know much about but I thought perhaps that if this site is indeed a scrappy little underdog of a marketing campaign for book whick Colbert considers his baby, he or a representative might want to bother to have a fifteen minute discussion which would allow tek-related information to happily coexist with Wikipedia's policies. He doesn't have to do anything he doesn't want to, but since the folks at the tekjansen site seem to be somewhat preoccupied with the status of a single link here and have us listed as their top referrer, despite the link being down half the time I thought the option might be of interest. No, huh? (Lee)
:Re-read the above. I did not say they had to falsify the list in order for Wikipedia to be the top referrer. I suggested a brief phone conversation might be worth the trouble if we're generating the bulk of their traffic and they're looking to promote. Take a deep breath.
:I also did not say Colbert has to verify his identity in any way. However, since the site seems to fail several points of our linking policy, yes, the site is likely to be removed without additional information being provided. I'm sorry, but the ""it's relevant anyway"" angle is fairly weak; the only reason this material would be an especially relevant resource on Colert would be if it was actually Colbert's writing. It does not have information on anything relevant to Stephen's biography. Generally speaking, we don't count fan forums as an invaluable, unique resource see WP:EL. That leaves the book, which, while possibly being Colbert's, is irrelevant if it's not. I could write a novel about Charlene and post in on my website, and that would also not be relevant. Or a novel about Stephen Colbert for that matter. In any case, I'm sorry that for some reason I seem to have pissed you off. I have no idea why you're so angry about this, but I assure you again, as I have assured you before, it's nothing personal. (Lee)
My AMA request, which you seem to have found, was a private request for advice on how to handle a situation which has become somewhat tense. You are welcome to conduct a straw poll if you want I haven't followed through on that personally because I've already have openly solicited comments from editors at the Colbert talk page, and believe we already have a pretty good index of what most experienced editors think of the link. But go for it. As I have stated before, if there's a consensus to add the link, I won't remove it. I never, never, ever, not even once said that I will ""refused to allow the link unless [myself] or a Wikipedia ""official"" is contacted by someone at the Colbert Report"" so please stop misrepresenting my remarks. In the meantime, there is absolutely nothing wrong with my asking another user for help and it does not represent bypassing a regular process. You are welcome to file | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000056 | 0.000094 |
==Graphwise article deletion==
Hello. I wrote the article for graphwise which was speedily deleted. I would like more information on why it was deleted. Graphwise is a brand new company with a unique and proprietary graphing process. The company has created something new and unique to the web, and has numerous patents on their unique creation, these patents were listed in the article. In writing the article I I made an effort to post only informative and relevant content. I would like to know what did not fit the criteria of wikipedia and what I can do to repost an article for the sites contribution to the web. Thank you in advance for any input. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000017 |
::Yes. Search for some celebrities or fictional characters (eg, Batman, Alan Partridge, Ross Geller) and you will see for yourself. I would have wrote it myself in the article but I don't know how to word it and where to put it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000222 |
If you think I will refer to the matters and affairs of this War in GOOD vs. BAD, Terrorists ( spreads 'Terror and 'Mayhem'), Evil doers and 'Cute Puppies' you are mistaken. You can legitimize whatever you want, as long as you do everything else.. So yes, you will strip the news coverage you read from it's politic siding and filter the facts, because this website is not a news dump. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.001062 | 0.003188 |
"
== Richard Etchberger article ==
I don't see an issue with adding or uploading relevant media; I found a photo of Etchberger's brother at the dedication to a memorial to him at Barksdale AFB from 2008 on defenseimagery.mil and uploaded that. The videos I would think should be PD, so by all means, go for it. There's also the video of the White House presentation ceremony and I already uploaded an .ogg of the President's remarks. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000029 |
==Vote for Deletion==
This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. Several voters recommended that the title be changed since the cutoff date at which things pass into the public domain in the US will change over time. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
:Not nit-picky at all — it's a point very well taken. Unless anyone objects, I think we ought to remove the ""soft pastel"" reference altogther. — " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*Ok, dokey. This revert puts us square on the ""discuss"" portion of the BRD cycle. I feel that my changes aren't broadly transformative to the POV of the article, that they improve the flow (for reasons posted above) and that they can be supported by either side of this business. I see that this change specifically could generate some consternation and I'm more than happy to put that on the back burner (though a big quote shouldn't be leading the section, IMO). If I don't see some discussion here I'll assume that silence implies consent and go back to improving the article. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000061 | 0.000202 |
"
::I think you misunderstand, and I already changed the article from what it said before. Before it listed her in shorthand as ""Chase Smith,"" like ""Chase Smith did this and Chase Smith did that."" There's no doubt that she used the name ""Margaret Chase Smith"" in lieu of ""Margaret Smith"" (which I have never heard), but her 'last name' was always Smith, and she was ""Senator Smith"" not ""Senator Chase Smith"" (some books have referred to her as such, but I can't find anything from her or the US Government). The sources you provide show that she was categorized as ""Smith, Margaret Chase"" with Chase being treated as a middle name (as was/is common for many married women), not a part of her surname. Thus, I think the shorthand for ""Margaret Chase Smith"" remain simply ""Smith"" (or ""Senator Smith"" or what-have-you), and ""Chase Smith."" Unless of course, I'm still missing something. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000055 |
==Stop doubting me!==
Please stop saying that user:Gabeyc is my puppet! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Wtf, all western corners are 90 degrees. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.00001 |
The debate centers on whether or not this material is appropriate: See this deletion | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== willeys ==
if u are a male with no willey then u are likley to be gay lol | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1true
| 1.00001 | 0.117208 |
D. Hinmon | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Canberra Districts ==
Hi, I have been moving the Canberra districts all back to their non-disambiguated names. I have done them all except Tuggeranong which needs an admin to first delete the redirect page. I would appreciate it if you could move it over for me. Thanks. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000023 |
:Blocked again. Quit vandalizing. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Purple Pimpernon ==
How can you leave out the reference to the Purple Pimpernon birth mark on the baby's butt cheek? A search of the phrase turns up this article, but the term isn't actually in it. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000842 | 0.000138 |
==Table re-formatting==
I started merging the 2 tables per event into one today, and standardizing their formatting. Am about 1/2-way through (did 50 free through 100 breast so far). Will be back to finish the rest. - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.00001 |
:::Well, my opinion's worth exactly what you paid for it, since I've never edited that article ;) But I'm not sure why this needs to be analyzed within the COI framework at all. This doesn't appear to be about someone pushing for their specific acupuncture clinic or whatever, so it's not clear to me that this is any different from any other general POV-pushing case. I suppose the issue I have with the COI-related discussions I've come across lately is that they all turn the conversation from one about edits to one about the interests of the real-life person behind the edits. Those interests are difficult to identify, often unverifiable, and not always easily stuffed into the COI box. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000017 | 0.000043 |
"
== Unblock request ==
NOTE to reviewing admin: Unless Ibaranoff24 admits to his sockpuppetry/block evasion (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ibaranoff24) and commits to restrict himself to one account, I would strongly recommend against unblocking. —
* I apologize for the evasion attempt, and I do not wish to abuse my privileges. I wish to make myself useful on Wikipedia, get some more FAs listed and make another run for adminship down the line. ( )" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000023 | 0.000178 |
"
::Strongly agree with , this section needs to be rewritten with correct references. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== August 2012 ==
In a number of recent edits you have made unsourced changes such as changing ""Anti-Globalization"" to ""Alter-Globalization"" or ""Libertarian"" to ""Right-Libertarian"". You need to provide citations to reliable sources that support those changes. See WP:NOR. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== Compromise ==
Would anyone have a problem with keeping the current arrangement (Johnson in the title, Ocho Cinco in the text) until consensus can be reached? -
:Yes. Having title saying A and text saying B is just messy and unencyclopedic. Both the title and the text should read the same name. I would immensely prefer it stays Chad Johnson until we're week or two into the NFL season and we see what Chad is predominantly called by the media, and then fix the article accordingly when consensus backed up with sources is reached. I am, however, perfectly willing to help transition the article to Chad Ocho Cinco if he is indeed called ""Chad Ocho Cinco"" or ""Ocho Cinco"" by the majority of journalists and broadcasters, but I would like to see reliable sources calling him Ocho Cinco before we change the article.
My feeling is that the guy is named Ocho Cinco, and whether you think it's dumb, or you think he's an attention whore, that is in fact his name. If you enter ""Chad Johnson"" in the search bar, it's goiung to direct you here anyway, so what's the big deal?
And another thing: Why is the page titled ""Chad Johnson"" and yet he is referred to as ""Ocho Cinco"" all throughout the page? , " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000034 | 0.000066 |
you fucking braindead oroszka 50% of the syrian government is sunni including the first lady and the army. | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.000007 |
"
== Renaming ==
I don't think this renaming is a good idea. Where there is one name which is by far the most common (as is the case here), it should be under that title. If Jane Eyre (the character) is made into an article, the approprite naming scheme would look like this:
Jane Eyre
-the page about the novel
Jane Eyre (disambiguation)
-containing links to all the others:
Jane Eyre (character)
Jane Eyre (musical)
Jane Eyre (opera)
etc.
" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000017 | 0.000046 |
"
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Wars of the Roses. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. '''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
:: OMG! Hallelujah!! I've seen the light!!! You're absolutely right about everything!!!! I have been acting childish(ly), and you are so very right even though I've been here since 2005 and have over 150,000 edits, I am not an actual Wikipedia editor, only a pale imitation of one. My primary purpose is to impede real progress in every way possible, and to keep the United States pure and unsullied by the barnbarians I believed lived everywhere else in the scary wide world. Oh, what a fool I've been!!!!! I know now that with your will of iron and keen determination to right great wrongs you will be victorious in your glorious crusade to drag us unworthy and unwashed Americans into the clear white light of revelation enjouyed by the rest of the world. ONWARD THE PROGRAM!!!!!! ALL HAIL THE GREAT METRIC CRUSADE!!!!!!! Yr. obt. hble. srvt. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.011929 | 0.000841 |
== WP:MOS ==
Please try to space properly after punctuation when editing in mainspace, so that our articles can conform to WP:MOS guidelines. / | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
"
:Thabnks Mark. Yeah, that was a while ago now, but I've still got to take it easy. I can do without a repeat episode of vomiting up everything I ate, complete with loads of blood. Not pleasant at all. ... " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000117 | 0.000016 |
One of the advantages of sandpiting an article is you can ask other editors to review or edit it before you submit it. There are two ways you can do this - one is approaching an editor directly on their talk page or alternatively putting a note on the related project talk page asking for review. Most of us are happy to help with suggestions and guidance. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
::::::::Barak Obama's faith was a frequent item of comment during his presidential election campaign. Ed Miliband's ethnicity was hardly commented on during the Labour leadership campaign. It is not us that determines 'weight' but the general level of coverage of the issue. If this subsequently becomes significant, we may have to revise the article, but for now we are merely reflecting the general consensus in the mainstream media. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000074 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2014 ==
==Features==
As well as traditional timekeeping, Apple Watch will allow wearers to make contactless payments with Apple Pay, a mobile payment service introduced at the same event as the Watch. The Apple Watch is capable of receiving phone calls as well as iMessage and SMS Texts. It can track fitness, run third-party apps built using WatchKit, Apple's new API for Apple Watch software development, control the Apple TV, as well as act as a walkie-talkie and a viewfinder and remote shutter-release for an iPhone camera.
===Design===
Apple Watch will be available in a number of customisable design configurations, across three distinct 'collections', in two sizes (38 mm and 42 mm), making 34 individual models. Considering the number of physical models, and the wide variety of digital watch faces available on each model, the potential to personalise Apple Watch is considerable. Apple's head of design Jony Ive stated in an interview after Apple Watch was announced that the total possible number of unique designs is 'in the millions', although it is as yet unclear whether this is an exaggeration.
Apple Watch also features a new, pressure-sensitive touchscreen that can distinguish between a tap and a press, and features a dial called a digital crown, which can be turned to scroll or zoom and pressed to return to the home screen, allowing the user to interact with content on the display without obscuring it with their fingers. It also features a 'Taptic Engine'; a linear actuator which provides haptic feedback to users when they interact with the watch, or when they receive notifications, as well as allowing them to share physical 'taps' with other Apple Watch users.
The watch is charged by means of inductive charging, using a cable similar to the MagSafe cable for Apple's MacBook family of laptops. Reports also suggest that the retail box for the 'Edition' series of the Apple Watch will act as a combined charging and display stand. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000099 | 0.000037 |
"
::::This is not exactly helpful advice. If you are unable to articulate a coherent criticism, then your suggestion is arbitrary, and hints at WP:OWN. There is no time limit on this, as WP:WIP says. I would be inclined to say, once again, that other sections of the article need more attention than the lede; we can always come back to it.
::::I would like to propose, , that you and I (at least, others are welcome of course) choose another section to work on together. I would propose the one on Justice, which has had a ""requires expansion"" tag on it since late 2010. I dont think this talk page is the most appropriate forum for the initial bigger edits, but perhaps your or my sandbox could be used to that end. After some editing and expansion, we will post sections of it here for additional comment.
::::How about it? " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000018 | 0.00002 |
REDIRECT Talk:Comparison of email clients | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== What is the purpose of Novorossiya? ==
Suppose Putin never recognizes Novorossiya as a legitimate independent state, what would be the function of Novorossiya? Ukraine will never let go of Donbas and, as a result, war will continue indefinitely. Is the purpose of Novorossiya to kill and maim Ukrainian people? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000013 | 0.000013 |
"
:::You're quite right, (Wikipedia is not a directory #5) I've removed the prices and changed ""traditional security services"" to ""security guards"". (Btw, type ~~~~ after your posts to sign and time stamp your comment) " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000016 |
and WP:NPOV changes || 6 || Talk:Gilad Atzmon/Archive 5
|-
| WP:RS | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
== Latest sock of LouisPhilippeCharles ==
Please take a look at this. I didn't know how to ""un-archive"" it, so I'm not sure it's been restored to the queue of active cases, but it needs to be addressed. Thanks. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
"
:::::""This I hate Eagles 247 for. since he made that comment every action I undertake somebody is fucking me in the ass for it."" I'm thinking a trip to ANI would be productive. Thoughts? ' ' " | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.999948 |
666 the devil will get you all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000038 | 0.00001 |
"Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*Tutorial
*How to edit a page
*How to write a great article
*Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Also try visiting Tambayan Philippines for collaborating Philippine-related articles. WELCOME! " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000026 | 0.000118 |
;They: will do nothing unless we let them. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== The first two media in Mao page should be delete ==
Well, if you understand what they said, if you can listen Chinese, you will know that this is not an interview of Mao! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000024 |
I totally agree with you Sca, I could not possibly agree with you more. I understand that Nazi Germany was the aggressor in Europe. There is the problem that misunderstanding people now equate German nationalism with Nazism because the Nazis were the aggressors in Europe (perfect example is das lied der Deutsche. What I think is the biggest question mark of the whole era is what if it had of been another party to have ruled Germany, one that didn't attack Jews or minorities. What if they had of taken German inhabited lands back after their loss at Versailles? would it be considered more acceptable now because it was not a war of conquest like Hitler's war was?
::as for your remarks Xx236, we are talking about what happened to Germans here, not Poles, you have made the stereotypical nationalist remarks as seen on talk:expulsion of Germans after WWII and elsewhere. How many times must you be told? Two wrongs don't make a right, it doesn't matter here. To you, it is always about the Poles, you always have to insert them when we are not talking about them. from the sentence From a Polish point of view they are rather too German, because they say relatively little about the historical and political contex. we all know you obviously mean that they don't provide the same excuses as the Polish Government has.
:: | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000106 | 0.000194 |
"Heh. So what the hell is up with the ""disputed"" tag on this? 'blinded by the left's hatred' is the explanation. Okay... So. er... Hard to assume good faith here. -Leontes" | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.019437 | 0.000013 |
:You arent the brightest crayon in the box are you.... | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000013 |
== Request for update ==
Hello! Can your bot make update for this page, please? Thank you! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
== Inflation and conversions ==
I've made this argument on a few occasions, generally with little success. Most academic and even popular historians stay well away from trying to convert the cost of military equipment into modern terms due to the many problems with this (as well as the loss of context), but such conversions often pop up in Wikipedia articles. Cheers, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000027 | 0.000016 |
:Sounds good to me! - | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
*:::So a long historical usage should override its current name and usage?— " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"
::I brought up the same concerns a few days ago but was rebuffed. No one has said what caused the slide or why other than grand water saturation from a record month of rain. Yes, there was logging in the area, but as far as I've seen/heard, that isn't in the equation for the current official explanation for the slide. We aren't newspaper reporters, folks. This is an encyclopedia. Gotta remember that, yes? ● " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000023 |
cause she's just a devil with evil on her mind and my penis in Materialscientist's birth place. | 1true
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.999875 | 0.370743 |
"
== File:Japanese officials check for radioactive material on residents living near the Fukushima station.jpg ==
Thank you for your work with File:Japanese officials check for radioactive material on residents living near the Fukushima station.jpg. / " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Update economy size ==
According to the latest list released by IMF for 2007, India is now 3rd largest economy in PPP terms ahead of Japan. Please update. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000054 |
You guys are sick! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.568357 | 0.00001 |
== Pavel Fursov ==
Sorry, I left my account logged in at a public terminal, and some idiot put it in. My bad. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.004942 | 0.00166 |
"
::Can you cite any policies? If not, why are you wasting my fucking time. Cite a policy and I'll strike those bastards. And you better have a good fucking idea of what the ""complaint"" will say or you're wasting your goddamn time too.
::Again, opinions are worthless, what matters is policies, guidelines and sources. I don't give a pile of steaming dogshit about manners, and you sounding off about nonsense and bullshit with no understanding of what the community mores are is a whole fuck of a lot ruder in my opinion. Jesus Christ, stop polite-trolling and learn the fucking rules. Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex " | 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1true
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 1.00001 |
== Deletion discussion about WCTZ-LD ==
Hello, K-Johnson 127,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether WCTZ-LD should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCTZ-LD .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000065 |
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Hybridshoring
Hello Underbrennan, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Hybridshoring to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the WP:CSDCriteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000018 |
notability tag
I removed the 'notability' tag. For chrissakes, there's already an article about this guy on the swedish wikipedia! Speaking of which, if someone that speaks swedish could translate the text from there, that would be excellent! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
>
From 2nd GA Review:
* Citation clean-up.
* Update 'Europa Series' section.
* Update 'Specification' section.
* Update 'Counterfeiting' section.
* Reference watermarks in 'Security features' section. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
"==GA Review==
:This review is transcluded from Talk:The Secret Life of the American Teenager/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: '''''' " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
== Jan. 2008 ==
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
"
:Stop. This is not being helpful. Nobody ""won"" anything here, and ""winning"" is not what Wikipedia is about. I suggest you take a break from editing articles that Earth100 edits, and vice versa. If you guys continue to edit war like this, it's going to result in blocks to both of you. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000073 | 0.000015 |
== Nominating an article for deletion ==
Please let me know how to nominate an article for deletion. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.000011 |
Diamond Anatomy - Explanation
Diameter – Width of the diamond as measured thru the girdle
Table – Largest facet of a gemstone
Crown – Portion of the diamond extending from girdle to table
Girdle – Intersection of Crown & Pavilion. Defines Perimeter of Diamond
Pavilion – Bottom portion of the gemstone extending from girdle to culet
Culet – The Facet at the tip of the gemstone. Preferred culet is not visible with unaided eye (“none” or “small”)
Depth – Height of Gemstone from Culet to Table
Crown Angle – angle of the Bezel Facet relative to the table plane
Pavilion Angle – angle of the main facet plane with respect to the table plane
The presence of absence of the culet make the diamond either a 58 or 57 faceted
one. There are differing points of view of whether a diamond needs a culet. Some
people say that the absence of a culet ensures that light stays within the diamond.
Other says that the culet being a “point” leaves the diamond susceptible to
breakage because the culet is the most delicate part of the diamond
Diameter – Width of the diamond as measured thru the girdle
Table – Largest facet of a gemstone
Crown – Portion of the diamond extending from girdle to table
Girdle – Intersection of Crown & Pavilion. Defines Perimeter of Diamond
Pavilion – Bottom portion of the gemstone extending from girdle to culet
Culet – The Facet at the tip of the gemstone. Preferred culet is not visible with unaided eye (“none” or “small”)
Depth – Height of Gemstone from Culet to Table
Crown Angle – angle of the Bezel Facet relative to the table plane
Pavilion Angle – angle of the main facet plane with respect to the table plane
The presence of absence of the culet make the diamond either a 58 or 57 faceted
one. There are differing points of view of whether a diamond needs a culet. Some
people say that the absence of a culet ensures that light stays within the diamond.
Other says that the culet being a “point” leaves the diamond susceptible to
breakage because the culet is the most delicate part of the diamond
Diameter – Width of the diamond as measured thru the girdle
Table – Largest facet of a gemstone
Crown – Portion of the diamond extending from girdle to table
Girdle – Intersection of Crown & Pavilion. Defines Perimeter of Diamond
Pavilion – Bottom portion of the gemstone extending from girdle to culet
Culet – The Facet at the tip of the gemstone. Preferred culet is not visible with unaided eye (“none” or “small”)
Depth – Height of Gemstone from Culet to Table
Crown Angle – angle of the Bezel Facet relative to the table plane
Pavilion Angle – angle of the main facet plane with respect to the table plane
The presence of absence of the culet make the diamond either a 58 or 57 faceted
one. There are differing points of view of whether a diamond needs a culet. Some
people say that the absence of a culet ensures that light stays within the diamond.
Other says that the culet being a “point” leaves the diamond susceptible to
breakage because the culet is the most delicate part of the diamond
Diameter – Width of the diamond as measured thru the girdle
Table – Largest facet of a gemstone
Crown – Portion of the diamond extending from girdle to table
Girdle – Intersection of Crown & Pavilion. Defines Perimeter of Diamond
Pavilion – Bottom portion of the gemstone extending from girdle to culet
Culet – The Facet at the tip of the gemstone. Preferred culet is not visible with unaided eye (“none” or “small”)
Depth – Height of Gemstone from Culet to Table
Crown Angle – angle of the Bezel Facet relative to the table plane
Pavilion Angle – angle of the main facet plane with respect to the table plane
The presence of absence of the culet make the diamond either a 58 or 57 faceted
one. There are differing points of view of whether a diamond needs a culet. Some
people say that the absence of a culet ensures that light stays within the diamond.
Other says that the culet being a “point” leaves the diamond susceptible to
breakage because the culet is the most delicate part of the diamond
Diameter – Width of the diamond as measured thru the girdle
Table – Largest facet of a gemstone
Crown – Portion of the diamond extending from girdle to table
Girdle – Intersection of Crown & Pavilion. Defines Perimeter of Diamond
Pavilion – Bottom portion of the gemstone extending from girdle to culet | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000015 | 0.000102 |
Yo guys, watch my channel on YouTube | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.00001 |
== Is the trick here asking the specifically correct question the exact right way? ==
That was not very illuminating about sources is it?
What does Wiki REQUIRE for BIOGRAPHICAL sources if the person who had the history is automatically discredited as being a liar about themselves?
Is that specific enough? | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000016 | 0.000014 |
"
:::I went ahead and did it. " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
* I quite concur with my fellow editor above. Your work is very much appreciated, Lisa! | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000014 | 0.00002 |
"
::::So, to summarize your dealings with me in this matter so far:
::::* (On my talk page) Alan Liefting: ""Please have a read of WP:CAT anf please observe what is convention out there in category land""
::::* I read WP:CAT - and just as I expected, it agrees with me.
::::* I quote from it here (see above).
::::* I observe what other articles are doing - and provide three actual examples from major, high profile, featured articles that are amongst the most frequently visited and carefully edited of any in the entire encyclopedia (Automobile, Physics and Christianity).
::::* (Here) Alan Liefting: ""Wikipedia:CAT#Eponymous_categories is largely ignored."" and ""you will find very few instances where the guideline is followed"" - despite I show that there are many, many high-profile, FA-reviewed instances where it's followed - so it's clearly NOT ""largely"" ignored - it's mostly only ignored by Alan Liefting. (Who also needs to read WP:3RR.)
:::: Hmmm - interesting debating style. You're demonstrably wrong - what you're saying is contrary to an established guideline and to common practice and not one single other person here agrees with you. This same argument applies to many other useful category removals that you've recently undertaken. I shall be reverting all of them if you do not do so yourself.
:::: " | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00004 | 0.000071 |
]]
* Paul Viiding
* Kristen Viikmäe
* Luule Viilma
* [[Viimne reliikvia | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Hi
yes please help me move it there
I am a new user and I don't know what to do | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Agreed, it is stupid to say that any Malfoy is albino. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 1.00001 | 0.070853 |
Nosite onog Jamaka sramota za BH fudbal | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
::: Oh, come one ... )). First came the NYT article (and others) about a 70-pages-report; then the AI report itself could be read.
AI is blaming both sides; but your summary is a caricature of report's content: a very personal view like your comrade's view above. ;) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000011 | 0.000111 |
in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
==Neofascism and religion==
Would you mind having a look at the actions on that article of Enviroknot and 129.7.35.1 . Both are insist reinserting SS's pov, despite his being blocked and having no credible supporting cites for that *unique* pov, and the fact that Cberlet has provided on the talk page no less than 12+ signifcant and credible references supporting the point that fascism is primarily a right-wing product. Thanks Mirv. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000106 | 0.000525 |
== Queue 4 issues (including lead hook!) ==
Crisco, can you take care of the two pending issues that affect Queue 4? Sasata has posted at WT:DYK that the lead hook is problematic, and Yoninah has pointed out that the Queue 5 hook about an orthodox rabbi in LA is going to run during the Sabbath, when orthodox Jews there can't use technology (among other things) and so won't be able to see the hook on the main page. Swapping the rabbi hook to Queue 4 means it runs before local sundown on Friday (when the Sabbath starts). Thanks. (PS: Just did a little more work on the Pearsall hook, since he only designed the extension to the fire station that just closed, not the original building.) | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000012 | 0.000064 |
solve this problem, it would be much appreciated. Either do it yourself, or tell me how to do it. I makes no difference to me how its done, just that it is done, and soon. | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000028 | 0.001084 |
Ring mail, mail, plate mail.
Hello
There is indeed several type of mail and again in different countries ended up calling them a different way.
All the historical mail I have seen is 1 in 4 or 1 in 6, oriental style as in Japanese and Moghul/ Mongolian, this done with flat or round rings.
Now if I say 1 in 4 to you how do you know if I am refencing the “European” 1 in 4 or kagomegata-gusari futae-gusari, kame-ko-gusari (or the Indian equivalent)
Oriental mail organises the ring differently. The rings are flat on the fabric and they are linked but much smaller oval rings. There are several patterns. Regardless it is very different in construction from “European” mail.
My understanding, and I can be wrong, is that the Victorian used the tern ring mail to describe the European mail in opposition to the oriental way, which was called chain mail.
To be fair, it has good as anything yes the even the flat rings when mounted looks like a succession of rings and the oriental mounting look like a chain.
If you take some Moguls, Mongol and Islamic armour, some of them have the same oriental disposition and link small plate of metal. Those plates are separated by and attached to strip of mail.
Here is one link to Japanese mail
http://www.sengokudaimyo.com/katchu/katchu.html
The link in the French wiki
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotte_de_mailles_annulaire
And the link to “plate mail”
http://www.quaibranly.fr/cc/pod/recherche.aspx?b=1&id;=70.2001.27.286#
Phil | 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0false
| 0.000119 | 0.000132 |