instruction
stringlengths
22
145
input
stringclasses
1 value
answer
stringlengths
220
325
text
stringlengths
382
597
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd) from EQUULEUS was 8.8 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (4.6, 15.4) <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd) from EQUULEUS was 8.8 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (4.6, 15.4) <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd) from EQUULEUS was 8.8 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (4.6, 15.4) <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd) from EQUULEUS was 8.8 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (4.6, 15.4) <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd) from EQUULEUS was 8.8 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (4.6, 15.4) <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Pomalidomide+Dexamethasone (DPd) from EQUULEUS was 8.8 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (4.6, 15.4) <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd)?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd)? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (DKd) from EQUULEUS was Not Reached months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/134/5/421/273899/Daratumumab-plus-carfilzomib-and-dexamethasone-in)</sup>
Median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd)? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Daratumumab+Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (D-RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd) from Griffin was None months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/136/8/936/454474/Daratumumab-lenalidomide-bortezomib-and)</sup>
Median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd)?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd)? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Isatuximab+Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) from IKEMA was NR months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd)?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd)? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Carfilzomib+Dexamethasone (Kd) from IKEMA was 19.15 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of (15.77, NR) <sup>[1](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00592-4/fulltext)</sup>
Median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for High-Dose Melphalan. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of High-Dose Melphalan from GIMEMA was 43 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR)?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR)? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR).
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR). ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Melphalan+Prednisone+Lenalidomide (MPR) from GIMEMA was 22.4 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of disease stage at the start of treatment on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of concurrent health conditions on the median PFS for Lenalidomide Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of Lenalidomide Maintenance from GIMEMA was 41.9 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Median PFS for No Maintenance?
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Median PFS for No Maintenance? ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Comparison of the median PFS for No Maintenance with other treatment regimens.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: Comparison of the median PFS for No Maintenance with other treatment regimens. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for No Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of patient characteristics on the median PFS for No Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for No Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of genetic factors in the median PFS for No Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for No Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The influence of previous treatments on the median PFS for No Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for No Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The effect of dosage and administration frequency on the median PFS for No Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The correlation between the median PFS for No Maintenance and overall survival rates.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The correlation between the median PFS for No Maintenance and overall survival rates. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for No Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The impact of side effects and adverse reactions on the median PFS for No Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for No Maintenance.
The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>
Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. ### Instruction: The role of supportive care in improving the median PFS for No Maintenance. ### Response: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment combination of No Maintenance from GIMEMA was 21.6 months with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of None <sup>[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1402888)</sup>