Datasets:

pietrolesci
/

wikitoxic

id stringlengths 16 16	text stringlengths 6 5k	labels class label 2 classes	uid int64 0 128k
794c30aff0931384	And that's not a personal attack^^ ?	0non	0
23a5fedbe63573bd	" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bruce Stern. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Bloom) "	0non	1
24c21e4b0b831f6f	" User:Public Juju/Sandbox Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Canis lupus 265b.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. '''''' Talk "	0non	2
d4f19d76911a174d	So why M.K. didn't blocked? He deleted my message on his talk? Greets;] Alden or talk with Alden	0non	3
7da2032cd711584e	" You can only do it with the PSP dev kit, which is 8 grand. @ "	0non	4
ab72d0c417556e88	I reverted the page to the last stable form. I thought there was a discussion on which location to use, but now I can't find it.	0non	5
427c92261ae02a39	Kelly\|hi!]] 18:36, 22 December 2010	0non	6
55574ef67d0b6e38	January 2009 Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.	0non	7
19715ee6ad05a01c	Your parents must be proud of you, Matt shepard!	0non	8
84b00fb9071b6bcc	" Note also section 1 in the main page lists ""R(t+1)."" Shouldn't this be ""R(t)"" as well? RDK"	0non	9
3f6347faa2529a34	Waterloo Road Edits You are making unnecessary edits to the infox information of the Waterloo Road charatcers. Additional information is not needed 92.22.84.19	0non	10
815d1858012d7adf	" Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Etsy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ()(Talk) "	0non	11
30dc274513233575	FUCK FUCKITY FUCK FUCK FUCK	1tox	12
fa30d7c48f5051cb	Also I removed the section in the next paragraph suggesting a link between homosexuality and eunuchs in the bible. The passage in the bible which is reference is about celibacy and has no reference to sexuality. These are questions being asked of Jesus about marriage, divorce, and not being married. There is no reference to being gay, so I would suggest this has been added by someone with an agenda.	0non	13
aa2b9fa5467daa4f	" Certainly looks like the same user; thanks for the note. (talk) "	0non	14
bb47684bf658b6de	Mccready, To be frank your edit and approach to this is disingenious. While you a clearly a chiroskeptic, and are entitled to be, modifying the opening lead which is a direct quote of the World Federation of Chiropractic representing the viewpoints of over 100 national organizations is neither necessary nor acceptable. Their aforementioned WFC definition of chiropractic is in itself a consensus statement and your edit has been voted down by the majority of the wikipedia chiropractic editors. To be frank, I call a spade a spade. You seem bent on trying to discredit chiropractic and CAM therapies in general by adopting a very rigid approach, not unlike the dogma present in some chiropractic circles. Regardless of your personal BELIEFS, unless you are willing to increase your understanding of current trends in the CAM professions then your input and consequently, impact, will be limited here. 208.101.89.150	0non	15
3a9656dae4b54ef5	You LOVE Anime!? There are some ANIMES out there that suck! You idiot!68.84.225.186	1tox	16
f5fffe914d31b5a7	" While ""your"" at it, learn how to spell. Duh. I already did read it, as I bloody well said earlier. Please show me a copy of Balbo's itinerary where he wrote, ""il mio viaggio a Derry"". "	0non	17
d713cdf5bed223a8	Hi! so umm i guess yer incharge here hehehe. so wassup?	0non	18
661904c695e31963	Just to clarify on Riigikogu - all citizens of Estonia, regardless of ethnicity, are eligible to participate in the elections. Remember, a third of local russian-speaking population do have citizenship.	0non	19
e6051913321df290	To faithlessfaggotboy: Suck my dick you goddamn gay-lovin piece of shit liberal. If I ever met you on the street I'd knock your empty head off your shoulders.	1tox	20
cd250fd7cf180e60	On Frank? Do you listen to that station every single day? —	0non	21
e42dd30cfecf4ee2	" Oh, what you wrote was ""Both of you need to just let this go or both of you are going to end up blocked for disruption."" I interpreted that as meaning I couldn't take the subject further despite new developments which I think are allied. Thanks for the direction to thataway because I believe they need to be investigated further. Cheers. "	0non	22
f5ef7943e46044d1	No problem, anyway I won't be losing any sleep over my loss of editing power. Have a nice day Hg and various other people.	0non	23
a2f59e64d8d5c396	And I don't understand what you try to tell me. So shut up and don't change my contributions!!!!	1tox	24
bfdf2abd0091a6d1	Greetings Shlama, I see that u speak aramaic. I am not hre to argue anything, I have only left this message to say hi and just get to know you. I am a lover of knowledge and am very interested in what ethnicity you are. From the looks of it, some Assyrian wikipedians believe you are an Assyrian, but it appears that you relate with Aramaic. So, what do u consider urself to be? I ma very curious, because I like to know about peoples who have lived to this day. Also, what religion, culture, background etc. I am an Assyrian Catholic of Iraqi background. Nice to talk to you, Regards,	0non	25
d3b0c70d7a5f5dfa	THE IMAGE IS PORNAGRAPHIC WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DONT UNDERSTAND CUNT	1tox	26
21ccd1812f1d5efb	Birth Name in , on the Verve Webpages and in she is reported to be born as Eleanora Harris and not as Fagan.	0non	27
73d0a3c6ac6dd942	As the article notes, Shahak repeated the account on the first page of his 1994 book, with no hint that he had ever retracted it since his first report nearly thirty years earlier. In the absence of any corroboration, we must assume that the unsupported statement that he retracted the claim was itself mistaken.	0non	28
c9d0ab14a016ed49	" Additionally, Amphetamine mixed salts does not seem to be grammatically correct (I read it as ""Amphetamine, mixed salts."" Should it not instead be Mixed amphetamine salts? However, if we want to use the prescription label it should just be Amphetamine salts - though non-specific, it is likely the most true to reliable sources. talk "	0non	29
c4bb5a263552a117	Why can't we discuss the truth of this and add it to the article? Why must it be swept under the carpet? It is well known that the average IQ of African Americans is lower than European Americans, and that the average IQ of the Japanese is higher than that of White Europeans and Americans. There is nothing offensive about it. If the IQ of Tibetans are currently lower than average is correct, then perhaps authorities could begin to address the issue. 81.132.63.38	0non	30
05926a656e933da4	REDIRECT Talk:NXT TakeOver (series)	0non	31
a3621817ec94f22c	See how the comment was about cencorship? And then you go STRAIGHT around and cencor me making me look like an idiot:D Hurry up now Ian!! Get this deleted before someone sees it and might get and original thought!;)	1tox	32
46b752562fd11f25	i think like many people in the entertainment industry he may have shaved a few years off his age	0non	33
6c2a1981fcdc1e9e	I appreciate this edit by had to compromise as the claimed source for Yoga being central to Vajrayana doesn't actually have that. Also, Goodfaith17 can't give any satisfactory explanation for these three edits in which he either removed 'Hindu' or replaced it by 'Indian' 1, 2, 3. You can't say that Swami Vivekananda was a non-Hindu or Patanjali was not a Hindu saint. You also cannot say that this source about Malaysia doesn't mention the word 'Hindu'. Overall, you can't justify your edits. Hence they are very likely to be reverted. -	0non	34
309b450dbd9ad1a6	shit-faced loser You fucking twat	1tox	35
89dd95309d436d19	(I haven't undone a valid edit, I've added to it and then he starts the war)	0non	36
498c77dcec94e0a5	" Well, what I mean is: should the singles for the other markets have their own separate articles, or have their infoboxes included in the articles below the UK and US infoboxes, or just vanish in the haze? I'm not seeing an answer to that in John's comments. •talk• "	0non	37
0c77d403e1ba3ef7	until section Berlin which was started 2006-06-06.	0non	38
0403ee40569d1a31	" Possibly unfree File:Serieswavepack.JPG An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Serieswavepack.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (talk) (talk) "	0non	39
8c43bcbcc4cc16b9	" Quit removing the ""status unclear"" table, please. Domestication is not completely cut and dry. There are definitely animals that are domesticated by some standards/definitions, and not by others. And at least one animal on the table you keep removing is, in my opinion, pretty clearly a domesticated animal (considering how many morphs of leopard geckos have been bred). Some of the animals on that table may not belong there, I kind of did a copypaste of a bunch that had been deleted from the first table, but at least some of them are possibly to probably domesticated, depending on what definition you use. And if you leave them on the page, in the ""status unclear"" table, then people will presumably stop adding them to the main table, which gets rid of the truly frustrating ""Hey, why isn't (foo) on this table?"" ""Hey, what is (foo) doing on this table?"" ""Hey, why isn't (foo) on this table"" add-delete cycle."	0non	40
bbc228bb9fc8e8f2	Does anyone know which of these represents the correct phonetic pronunciation of this word - Yay-go Jaa-go Jay-go	0non	41
31b17a1ae5d4b11c	Son Nathaniel seems to be the son of Jim.	0non	42
5e208eeff5477c6a	Now I know what the money that I have contributed to wikipedia has really been used for. Thank you for the lesson.	0non	43
9becdeb95bc4c1ec	" EDIT: The statement can be removed just on the basis that it adds no value to the article by making it even more biased towards enabling the Holocaust all over wikipedia. It assumes that - Leuchter doesn't know the amounts of cyanide needed to kill, and it assumes that Leuchter tried to disprove the gas chambers through ignoring the facts. Both of these without any proof that that's actually the case. Also, even if that was the case - what does ""tended to confirm it"" mean? Even safe amounts of gas found by any interested parties would ""tend to confirm"" that gassings took place, so it's irrelevant. In general, the whole article is focused on disproving the Leuchter report instead of displaying the Leutcher report - that's why it needs to be rewritten."	0non	44
39d334309dcec024	I saw the Karnataka portal. You are doign a fine job here.	0non	45
af92edf7323197e4	"==Taglines== These taglines are not notable. According to the Style guidelines, ""As a general rule don't include taglines in an article. ""Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information"". However, if a particular tagline was a significant part of the cultural influence of the film, create a section for it and describe its effects."" It provides an example of this as Jaws 2's tagline, ""Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water..."" which is indeed a notable tagline. The only taglines that are at all notable aren't notable because they're taglines, they're notable because they're memorable quotes from the movie. But why does it matter? Because they are unprofessional and unecyclopedic. They make the article ""all listy,"" which greatly detracts form its quality. This is why it has a clean-up tag. (As a side note, moving the lists to the bottom doesn't really help the problem at all.) I am un-willing to use your opinion as to what is notable and here is why. You are forgetting the historic refereance to the example you gave. ""A different set of Jaws"". I am returning the deleted section. Should Wiki Admin weigh in on this, I will do what they decide. Just coming around and saying something is not this or is that, does not make it true. I ask that you provide a basis to your belief that the Taglines from Rocky Horror are not notable or are you just not familier with the film?. If the taglines are culturally significant they will be quoted in a published source. I'm removing them again, per WP:REF. If you chose to re-add them, please provide citations. I'm sorry for the confusion, my link wasn't right: Try this. See also WP:REF and WP:N and WP:NOT. Consensus is clear that these taglines should go. Just exactly what do you call a consensus? Two people against one? I call those links consensus. By the way, with WP:NOT I meant WP:UNENC, I should have been more specific. Tag lines List re-added. Dispute of it's removal I am returning the Tagline list again. The Taglines from ""The Rocky Horror Picture Show"" are both culturely significant (Don't Dream It, Be it, and Let's do the Time Warp Again, both used as song lyrics and later as tag lines for the film in Print advertisement are two of the most remembered Tags as well as the original ""A Different Set of Jaws"") and Quoted in publications such as Time Magazine and Newspaper articles from coast to coast including the Fresno Bee, Sacramento bee and Modesto Bee, the San Francisco Chronicle as well as the New York Times. There is also the book ""The Rocky Horror Picture Show Book"" by Bill Henkin. That does answer to both Arguements from above. I officialy dispute it's removal. This is an article about a motion picture not about an individual item. There is going to be at least two list in ALL articles about films. The cast and crew and if its a musical a song list. Where advertisement has a significant historical context or influence it is notable to add the list. The call was for a cleanup not just a mass deletion. Plus I recommend both of the above to add citations as I have. I am looking through alot of media and will be adding more. I would like to now hear from a Wiki Admin on the subject as I believe it is the only way to end the dispute. You are confused on an important part of wikipedia policy: admins are not in any real position of authority. Things are decided by consensus and an admin's opinion is worth no more than any users. As I said above, consensus is clearly against you and the inclusion of these taglines. I am sorry but you are incorrect about what a consensus is. Please see below to the Wiki definition of Consensus. Also A true consesus takes time. More than you are allowing, per Wikipedia policy. Consensus should not be for or against an individual but about the subject. Also, your arguments are clearly wrong. First, the taglines were not used as song lyrics, the song lyrics were used as taglines. Also, the fact that there is a book about the rocky horror show that mentions the taglines does not mean the article should.	0non	46
16be1701e79a804e	(U.S. TV series)\|Wide World of Sports	0non	47
6dde7700cfa4d3df	":::The lede should be factually accurate as it stnds. I do not believe that ""self governing"" is factually accurate, but including the text ""enjoys a large measure of internal self government"" is accurate (or at any rate can be attributed to both the GIG and the FCO websites. We should therefore either remove the words ""self-governing"" from the lede or incorportate some kind of qualification such as the phase above. "	0non	48
979073e093ae2de8	I have added the paragraph that answers this question.	0non	49
1d1068c4f4cb1fce	Fuck off you can fuck right off mate!	1tox	50
88e7a61f2a935ea8	deconstruction article redux Hi Rbellin I'm new to wikipedia but eager to get involved. I've left comments on various talk pages about doing some work on the deconstruction article, which I know you've contributed to. Do you have any interest in doing some more work on it with my help? Maybe knocking off a few of those To-Do bullet points on the Talk page, or even, more immediately, cleaning up some of the prose for clarity? (The prose is actually fine in my opinion, but I think it can be toned down a little as many have complained about its complexity). Please let me know. Thanks.	0non	51
cceb8a083649a000	Bishonen: Hi, I am hahahihihoho. And I will put a source in the Bosnia and Herzegovina article where it says that 250 000 died. I will not delete the part where it says that 100 000 died. Is it a deal?	0non	52
935d7987f5b5bcd6	MS 13 for acuracy of this article you need to add mexicans nicaraguans and guatemalans as well in the list of people involved in the MS i have articles about many mexicans and nicaraguans that are in the ms 13 so that is something that needs to be in that section.	0non	53
72ee8d451616a3e2	" I wasn't alleging that you'd requested that I be blocked. I was warning you because if you delete my comments again, I'm going to request that you be blocked. If you want, you can whine about that ""threat"" to an administrator, but I'm pretty sure it's not grounds for blocking. - "	0non	54
c20712f1f3812536	I didn't see their messages! Private message boxes aren't always so obvious. I only realised once that a freenode staffer had contacted me, but I had to get off the computer, so Ijust said hi and left	0non	55
7dc920846d7eefb0	" WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! , and If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Bangalore Nagarathnamma You may like to contribute to this woman's article which I have substantially expanded.Nvvchar. "	0non	56
70a3d2a23e166e3b	List of pseudonyms? The article mentions that Creasy used 28 pseudonyms - what were they? While it is impractical to list all 600+ titles, it would seem more worthwhile to list a title associated with each of his pen names. 147.70.242.54	0non	57
2a3e0d916fe708b4	Existence Does wikipedia really exist?	0non	58
8003c3ecdd9a8509	Wikipedia:Don't lie, which you clearly are. Dishonesty is not viewed with satisfaction. 140.247.141.146	1tox	59
3cc2fa55adfdcbac	" Ethnocentric statement of ""discovery"" of gold How can you discovery something the existence of which has already been established although those that proclaim it discovered were mistaken. Gold was found in California w/early explorers along Colorado River & near Mexican era Los Angeles in 1832 so existence of gold only confirmed not discovered in 1848 although the find was reason for the 1849 Rush, the latter the unique part of incident. To say that gold was discovered in California in 1848 is an ethnocentric statement as well as an example of ignorance by those that either do not want to acknowledge that gold had already been verified as being in California therefore it cannot be a discovery. Finding more gold is not a discovery but a re-confirmation of the existence of gold in the area.66.74.176.59 "	0non	60
8e6dfe92eb668381	what responsibility?, why are you so stubburn??? , did i do anything wrong to you? why cant you just do that? you did it once. why did you rewrite my name???	0non	61
948ce66fd9ecf9bf	" There is nothing ""misleading"", he just has views that you don't agree with. "	0non	62
a5c570cb646f5250	" Your recent questions Will you PLEASE stop trolling on the science ref desk with those inane questions about ""why is (blank) easier than driving a car""? If you have some question that you're genuinely curious about, we'll be glad to answer it for you, but do you realize how ANNOYING it is when someone asks the same question over and over again? Thanks a lot! 67.169.177.176 "	0non	63
24307796ca2cb32c	" re: Laser flip Okay, thanks for your quick response, Talk "	0non	64
edfab4e3037612d4	" Small? Davidson Seamount is not small. It's one of the largest, but yes, that claim IS a bit perposterous. I know of one, Detroit Seamount, which is supposedly as big as the island of Hawaii itself. As for reliability, this source is of impecable qualtity because it's work done by the NOAA. As far as I can see it it's a silly mistake on the sheet...Mar "	0non	65
70fe22c4594d1f1b	" That's not a bad idea, but instead of having a section (which would probably end up turning into a list), just incorporate that info into the other sections. 666 "	0non	66
c40d91ab411f71a1	Patrolling Future from .	0non	67
e3bae82aa31318fb	The battle has been one big stalemate since the initial opposition attack.	0non	68
de528e741c3f8936	This article contains what appears to be fairly accurate and useful information; however, it contains no references to any studies which back up any of the information. Can anyone provide references? Basic research is preferable to review articles, in my opinion, because I have found that review articles fairly regularly cite sources that do not actually support the specific claim made in the review. My current project involves the PVN, so I may be able to provide a few in the future, but I highly doubt that my set of knowledge is exhaustive. 128.143.43.144	0non	69
2927801f4e9b8029	" Stroke out comment by blocked vandal who posted ""in my name"" in order to throw mud on me. "	0non	70
e3d3cf9351a1a12f	" As the deleting administrator, I will comment further. The material is a copy of http://ernestocrespo.com/index_archivos/About.htm, and Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from other sites unless a formal copyright release has been made - see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations. Assertion of permission is not enough. However, even if the copyright issue were resolved, this material is not suitable because, as WikiDan61 says above, it is not an encyclopedia's role to present new theories. See the policy Wikipedia:No original research, which includes: ""If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery. "" "	0non	71
8ed151824754a6f3	" Where did I say ""I do not like Queen""? Stop making assumptions. Your English may be poor, but so must your understanding of the language as a whole if you can read/see things than no one ever said. That is what is childish. Also you say your information os based on ""what you read"" (but you can't provide a source). Well guess what, I can't provide one either, but my information is also based on what I have read, so therefore your little posting holds no more value than mine."	0non	72
36fc5ebf4ab9f812	" style of cause You ought to be very careful of renaming the case ""R v Ab and CD"" to ""R v Incedal..."". The case is named in the transcript (you?) provided ""Guardian v AB CD"", and is likely to be filed under ""R v AB and CD"" for good, even tho its defendants are now known. The identity of the defendants is less important than the continuity of reference. You probably need to change the first sentence and the wiki title back to ""R v AB CD"" for reference sake. 66.185.200.1 "	0non	73
6210a3c9aea437b6	I noticed that you deleted peacecorpswiki Why did you delete this...this is an important online resource for Returned Volunteers.	0non	74
84aa67b07f98546f	Review under way. Any corrections I cannot make immediately will be noted on the talk page. (Suggest you let me finish (tomorrow lunchtime) before responding there).	0non	75
fb258ddf400ec747	" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Slavery in ancient Rome. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia Help pages Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (201.23.21.4) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! "	0non	76
0b129e6f00086a28	" I edited that a bit, having been inspired by an article by one Czech linguist from Charles University who did some research on interdialects in the Czech Republic. It is untrue that the Moravians speak ""correct"" Czech. There is no thing as ""correct"" Czech. Moravians have more forms that resemble ""standard"" Czech (or literary language), but it does not mean they speak ""correct"" Czech, because on the other hand, they have MANY forms that are totally out of standard (especially in the vocabulary field). "	0non	77
4c6aac53ebeede71	Liquitex is owned by Col Art, who also own Winsor & Newton but where is the evidence that Winsor & Newton make Liquitex Acrylic paints? W & N are a UK company - Liquitex was founded in the USA.	0non	78
4fcb5b05bfa8b213	G36 drawing Not to shoot down your obvious artistic propensity, but that drawing just isn't at all useful in that article.	0non	79
b3134c08df56a71a	Good idea Apart from the torturing i personally think it is a good idea. Modern laws prent	0non	80
85cb0c5cccf491ec	UserBoxes I noticed the cool user boxes you have on your page. How do one get that? Parul )	0non	81
c968544b575ec87f	Thanks for the support, folks.	0non	82
8a02d65e1b33fbf1	See WP:BIO. 67.67.219.223 He's written two books, and people have said on this talk page that they've come here looking for information about him. That would seem to make him notable. I did read the notable article. My revision added information and many sources, and he's been the subject of quite a few interviews, etc. I would like to revert back to the previous revision...	0non	83
087ca78aba0dfaeb	Salaam Hakim, is it possible you can lend be those books if you have the pdf version.	0non	84
41a568e8497037c6	" I'm Back Do you have a problem with me or something? I'm sick of you reverting my edits and calling me hateful names such as ""Rogue"" and ""Abuser"". Can you stop being so racist and let me edit wikipedia. If not I'm going toa take a page out of your play book and request to have you blocked for you constant attacks. And being the pimp that I am, I don't want to do it Googie, but I might have to."	0non	85
fbc80b1890332d4d	" Many thanks for these replies and the article updates, and for any others that may still follow. I'm still taking this decision in. It's obviously a huge one, but it's bounded by technicalities that (as a non-lawyer) I don't have a good ""feel"" for yet, and I suspect I'm not alone in that. "	0non	86
d58dff1162f842bf	"I STRONGLY object to calling Ted Stevens ""disgraced"". His conviction was overturned due to gross misconduct by prosecutors. "	0non	87
665c49231b9d632d	I am afraid i have to say he is the one editing my articles. If he does not stop neither will i. His english is so bad he should not be working on the english version of this.	0non	88
52fca29bffba9a1e	Aw come on! What's it really matter...	0non	89
0594c0d890be6c1b	" Besides correcting the populations, the figures from many other countries not yet listed, like ones with large diaspora populations, had to be added. By just listing each Slavic group with their global population number, the infobox is neater and required much less work. As for the pictures, I think we should just get rid of them. talk "	0non	90
b64ae4d54be2445b	... Anyway proclamation of the Carolingian empire was viewed as rather upspring than secession. In fact they did not view Irene who blinded her children as legitimate emperor	0non	91
3d29a807283732e2	Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.	0non	92
e83a582bffddd175	FACIST YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO WIKIPEDIA ARE NEGLIGENT AT BEST. KIND OF LIKE YOUR TEACHING. SMOKE WEED ERRRYDAY!	1tox	93
eb092d6f890235ba	" Care to explain, CJ? Swarm u / t "	0non	94
439e84169df2a718	" Confused about iban You instituted an iban on WarKosign an myself. WarKosign reverted my edit on the Israel article. When I complained on the admin notice board, WarKosign self reverted one iban violation with the comment ""Self-reverting possible violation of an iban. Someone else should apply this change."" His self revert with the message to here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&diff;=657360828&oldid;=657331946 After other editors responded to his message and revert to his revert of my edits, I tried to discuss the revert of my edits on the Israel article talk page by creating a new section titled """"The borders of the new state were not specified."", not a NPOV"". I found it impossible as WarKosign continued to comment on every aspect of the revert of my edits. WarKosign also continued to modify the revert of my edits in the article. I am confused as to how to respond to this, can you explain it to me? Thanks, "	0non	95
70a2763795636677	" Honestly, that was not ""threats of harassment"", maybe it sounds like it... but you don't know about the actual situation and what happened in the past. GVnayR is a very ""dangerous"" Wikipedian, I can deepen it. I'm editing Wikipedia since 2010 and I can say that he is the lamest, weirdest, most ""dangerous"", etc. In my opinion being blocked indefinitely because of this is not fair (1~2 months is more fair). Sadly, blocking this user Hydao (who always fought against vandalism and addition of nonsense things) will not solve the problem. Sooner, the user GVnayR will start adding completely stupid and nonsense things on Wikipedia, which is unacceptable. I will continue fighting against vandalism and nonsense stuff (added by losers/nolifers like GVnayR), with or without ""Hydao"". Now you are thinking: ""Hydao, you are insulting a user by calling ""loser and no-lifer"", but that's not an insult, it's just the reality. A high-functioning autistic who doesn't work, doesn't have a job, doesn't have friends, use the government pension to buy PlayStation games and pay the Internet bill, someone who spend his days/months/years doing NOTHING useful (except making frequently STUPID edits on Wikipedia and wasting other ppl PRECIOUS time...) is a big loser who needs a LIFE LESSON. I don't mind if this ""Hydao"" is blocked, the only thing I know is that GVnayR needs an ""ULTIMATE LESSON"". Well, at least I can say that Hydao ""died"" or is ""dying"" for a decent/noble cause. "	0non	96
b078852f951b788a	" By the way, Terrillja, where is your evidence of the French or American claims? You claimed that the Libyan source lacks evidence and that it's an unreliable source. But you have no evidence to prove coalition claims. We use links as information... whether one is true or not is not up to you to decide. Wikipedia is supposed to be nutral and show both sides reports. Everything is a ""report"" not a fact that can be proven beyond doubt. All we have to go on with the French claims is a link... all we have to go on with the Libyan shot down claim is a ""report"". So do tell me... whats the difference?? - AGSman61"	0non	97
4c621160dd571d2c	Pilecki's organisation1940-43 Years before Vrba-Wetzler! To quote: From October 1940, ZOW sent reports to Warsaw, and beginning March 1941, Pilecki's reports were being forwarded via the Polish resistance to the British government in London. These reports were a principal source of intelligence on Auschwitz for the Western Allies. Pilecki hoped that either the Allies would drop arms or troops into the camp, or the Home Army would organize an assault on it from outside.	0non	98
9b81c5486cde8598	Trying to silence others because you disagree with them Yeah, that's not how Wikipedia is supposed to operate. Your incivility in trying to silence me because you disagree with me will be reported if you persist. Remember: just because you disagree with someone is no reason to attempt to get that person blocked. In fact: that violates WP:BATTLEGROUND. So please: desist in your effort to silence me simply because you disagree with me. -	0non	99

End of preview. Expand in Dataset Viewer.

This is the same dataset as OxAISH-AL-LLM/wiki_toxic. The only differences are

Addition of a unique identifier, uid
Addition of the indices, that is 3 columns with the embeddings of 3 different sentence-transformers
- all-mpnet-base-v2
- multi-qa-mpnet-base-dot-v1
- all-MiniLM-L12-v2
Renaming of the label column to labels for easier compatibility with the transformers library