premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Kerwin is crazy. | neutral |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Clifford is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Renfred is light. | entailment |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Kerwin is wet. | entailment |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Otis is not wet. | neutral |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Shawn is not tame. | entailment |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Clifford is wet. | neutral |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Kerwin is tame. | contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Hannah is not wet. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Clifford is clever. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Shawn is light. | entailment |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Kerwin is uptight. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Shawn is not clever. | entailment |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Hannah is tame. | contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Kerwin is clever. | neutral |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Kerwin is not clever. | neutral |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Corwin is not wet. | contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Otis is not clever. | contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Hannah is clever. | contradiction |
Corwin is wet.
Otis is clever.
Corwin is not light.
Shawn is uptight.
Kerwin is uptight.
Renfred is not clever.
Clifford is clever.
Corwin is uptight.
Hannah is not uptight.
Hannah is not wet.
Corwin is not clever.
Clifford is tame.It can be concluded that Hannah is uptight and Clifford is not crazy once knowing that Shawn is wet.
If someone is tame or not wet, then he is not clever.
If there is at least one people who is both clever and not uptight, then Kerwin is not light.
Someone is not tame and wet if and only if he is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is wet, then Kerwin is not uptight.
If there is someone who is both light and crazy, then Shawn is not clever.
If Renfred is not tame, then Otis is not crazy and Corwin is uptight.
If someone is not light or not wet, then he is not crazy.
Someone being light is equivalent to being not clever.
If there is at least one people who is wet or not light, then Renfred is not tame.
As long as someone is uptight and light, he is not tame and not crazy.
It can be concluded that Otis is not tame and Renfred is not wet once knowing that Clifford is clever. | Corwin is light. | self_contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Truman is disturbed. | contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Aldis is not hypocritical. | contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marvin is hypocritical. | self_contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Truman is not friendly. | neutral |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marvin is not disturbed. | entailment |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marlin is frightened. | entailment |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marvin is guilty. | self_contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Truman is not disturbed. | entailment |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marvin is not comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marvin is friendly. | contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Theobold is frightened. | neutral |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Morris is not comprehensive. | contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Theobold is not disturbed. | entailment |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Morris is not friendly. | neutral |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Truman is comprehensive. | self_contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Cadman is not comprehensive. | neutral |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Morris is comprehensive. | entailment |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Marvin is frightened. | self_contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Truman is not frightened. | contradiction |
Truman is frightened.
Truman is not comprehensive.
Cadman is not hypocritical.
Marlin is frightened.
Marvin is frightened.
Marvin is not hypocritical.
Marlin is not disturbed.
Aldis is hypocritical.
Marvin is not friendly.
Theobold is hypocritical.
Morris is frightened.
Aldis is not guilty.If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Theobold is not disturbed and Marvin is guilty.
Someone being not guilty is equivalent to being not friendly.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and frightened, then Marvin is disturbed.
If all people are disturbed, then Truman is not friendly and Truman is not guilty.
Marvin being frightened or Morris being comprehensive implies that Aldis is not disturbed.
It can be concluded that Aldis is disturbed once knowing that Marlin is comprehensive or Truman is not guilty.
Someone who is not frightened is always guilty.
Aldis being not frightened implies that Marlin is not comprehensive and Marlin is not friendly.
Aldis being not guilty and Truman being friendly imply that Truman is comprehensive.
Someone is not comprehensive and hypocritical if and only if he is guilty.
Someone who is guilty or frightened is always comprehensive and not disturbed.
If someone is guilty and not friendly, then he is both comprehensive and not frightened, and vice versa. | Aldis is not comprehensive. | neutral |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Brian is not oak. | contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Rachelle is frantic. | contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Brian is not frantic. | entailment |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Baird is not frantic. | neutral |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Hannah is not frantic. | entailment |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Hannah is not agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Corwin is frantic. | self_contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Hannah is oak. | neutral |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Halden is frantic. | contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Ramsey is oak. | contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Ramsey is agreeable. | contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Hannah is not oak. | neutral |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Corwin is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Baird is frantic. | neutral |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Corwin is not frantic. | self_contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Ramsey is not repulsive. | neutral |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Brian is not black. | entailment |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Rachelle is repulsive. | entailment |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Hannah is not black. | self_contradiction |
Ramsey is not black.
Corwin is not popular.
Brian is not repulsive.
Brian is oak.
Corwin is not agreeable.
Rachelle is not frantic.
Ramsey is not agreeable.
Halden is not frantic.
Hannah is not black.
Hannah is repulsive.
Ramsey is not oak.
Hannah is not agreeable.Someone who is repulsive is always black.
If there is someone who is both not agreeable and not oak, then Corwin is frantic.
If all people are oak or agreeable, then Brian is black.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Hannah is not black and Rachelle is repulsive.
If there is at least one people who is not agreeable or popular, then Hannah is black.
If Corwin is repulsive and Rachelle is agreeable, then Rachelle is not popular.
If there is at least one people who is not oak, then Hannah is agreeable.
Someone is agreeable and not frantic if and only if he is not popular.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Brian is not black.
If someone is not black or he is agreeable, then he is not frantic.
If there is someone who is not oak, then Rachelle is not agreeable and Hannah is black.
If everyone is not repulsive, then Ramsey is not frantic. | Rachelle is not agreeable. | entailment |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Hardy is concerned. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Lauren is sweet. | neutral |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Hardy is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Aidan is realistic. | contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Lauren is not realistic. | entailment |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Albert is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Martin is not ugly. | neutral |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Hardy is disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Kingston is not sweet. | contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Aidan is compassionate. | neutral |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Aidan is not compassionate. | neutral |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Leslie is not concerned. | contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Leslie is concerned. | entailment |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Martin is not realistic. | neutral |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Leslie is ugly. | entailment |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Hardy is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Hardy is compassionate. | contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Kingston is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Hardy is not compassionate. | entailment |
Leslie is concerned.
Leslie is ugly.
Kingston is realistic.
Lauren is not ugly.
Aidan is not sweet.
Aidan is not realistic.
Albert is compassionate.
Hardy is realistic.
Hardy is concerned.
Hardy is not disobedient.
Hardy is sweet.
Kingston is disobedient.It can be concluded that Leslie is not sweet once knowing that Martin is disobedient or Aidan is not concerned.
If someone is both not ugly and not sweet, then he is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is ugly, then Kingston is sweet.
Someone being both not compassionate and not ugly is equivalent to being realistic and sweet.
Martin being not disobedient and Albert being realistic imply that Martin is not ugly.
If there is someone who is both not concerned and disobedient, then Hardy is sweet and Martin is not compassionate.
It can be concluded that Kingston is disobedient and Leslie is not compassionate once knowing that Martin is sweet.
Lauren being not ugly implies that Aidan is not sweet.
If there is someone who is not realistic, then Hardy is not concerned and Martin is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is either realistic or not compassionate, then Hardy is disobedient and Lauren is not ugly.
If Hardy is not sweet or Kingston is not concerned, then Leslie is not ugly.
Someone who is not ugly is always not realistic. | Kingston is disobedient. | entailment |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Kendall is not unfair. | contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Richard is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Aedan is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Raymond is unfair. | entailment |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Aedan is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Aedan is not unfair. | contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Raymond is miniscule. | contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Hannah is not miniscule. | contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Raymond is not excited. | self_contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Raymond is not selfish. | neutral |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Kendall is excited. | contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Silas is not selfish. | neutral |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Aedan is selfish. | neutral |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Kendall is not jealous. | entailment |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Silas is jealous. | entailment |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Raymond is jealous. | self_contradiction |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Stanley is not miniscule. | neutral |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Aedan is unfair. | entailment |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Kendall is not selfish. | entailment |
Silas is cheeky.
Richard is not jealous.
Raymond is jealous.
Kendall is not jealous.
Raymond is not cheeky.
Hannah is miniscule.
Aedan is not jealous.
Kendall is not cheeky.
Raymond is excited.
Raymond is not miniscule.
Stanley is unfair.
Kendall is not selfish.If Richard is cheeky, then Aedan is not jealous.
If there is someone who is cheeky, then Richard is not miniscule and Aedan is jealous.
Someone who is eithor cheeky or not miniscule is always jealous.
Someone who is eithor not excited or not cheeky is always not jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not unfair, then Hannah is excited.
If there is someone who is both not excited and not jealous, then Silas is not unfair.
Aedan being jealous and Silas being unfair imply that Kendall is cheeky and Kendall is excited.
Someone who is not cheeky or selfish is always not excited and unfair.
Someone is unfair if and only if he is not jealous.
If Hannah is unfair or Kendall is not miniscule, then Hannah is selfish.
If all people are not unfair or not miniscule, then Richard is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is both not selfish and miniscule, then Kendall is not unfair. | Richard is cheeky. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits