premise
stringlengths
923
1.41k
hypothesis
stringlengths
11
33
label
stringclasses
4 values
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Baird is not serious.
self_contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Collier is not serious.
self_contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Arthur is blue.
neutral
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Collier is concerned.
entailment
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Quinlan is not blue.
entailment
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
John is not entire.
contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
John is not blue.
contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Gabriel is not entire.
self_contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
John is concerned.
entailment
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
John is not fresh.
entailment
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Nathalie is accurate.
contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Gabriel is not blue.
neutral
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Collier is not entire.
contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Gabriel is entire.
self_contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Gabriel is concerned.
entailment
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Gabriel is not serious.
self_contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Collier is fresh.
neutral
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Nathalie is concerned.
contradiction
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Nathalie is fresh.
neutral
Nathalie is not blue. Gabriel is concerned. Nathalie is not concerned. Baird is concerned. Baird is serious. Quinlan is not entire. John is not fresh. John is blue. Gabriel is serious. Arthur is serious. Gabriel is not entire. Nathalie is not accurate.If there is someone who is either not concerned or fresh, then John is entire. Someone who is eithor not fresh or entire is always not serious. If John is not serious and Quinlan is fresh, then Baird is not entire. If Gabriel is not serious, then Quinlan is not blue and Gabriel is accurate. If Nathalie is not blue, then Collier is entire. If someone is fresh or he is not concerned, then he is not blue. If there is someone who is both serious and fresh, then Baird is not blue. If someone is concerned and serious, then he is entire, and vice versa. Nathalie being not fresh and Baird being serious imply that Nathalie is blue. If there is at least one people who is both not accurate and entire, then Collier is serious. It can be concluded that Gabriel is concerned once knowing that Baird is not blue. If someone is entire, then he is not serious, and vice versa.
Arthur is entire.
neutral
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Harris is not excited.
contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jerry is various.
neutral
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jonathan is not disgusted.
contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Harris is timid.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jerry is not excited.
entailment
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jed is not elderly.
neutral
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Harris is not various.
contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Vera is not timid.
neutral
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jerry is excited.
contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Lloyd is not excited.
entailment
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Lloyd is not timid.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jed is not timid.
neutral
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Harris is excited.
entailment
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Harris is elderly.
entailment
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jonathan is not excited.
contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Lloyd is timid.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Jonathan is not various.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Harris is not timid.
self_contradiction
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Hope is excited.
entailment
Jerry is not excited. Lloyd is not excited. Jed is not courteous. Harris is various. Lloyd is not timid. Hope is various. Lloyd is not disgusted. Hope is excited. Harris is timid. Harris is not disgusted. Jonathan is disgusted. Jonathan is excited.If there is at least one people who is various, then Jonathan is not elderly and Vera is disgusted. If there is at least one people who is both not excited and not timid, then Jonathan is elderly. Someone being excited is equivalent to being various. It can be concluded that Jerry is disgusted once knowing that Lloyd is timid and Lloyd is various. If someone is not excited, then he is not disgusted. If there is at least one people who is not courteous, then Harris is elderly. If Jerry is courteous and Jerry is disgusted, then Vera is not elderly. If there is someone who is either timid or not elderly, then Jonathan is not various. Someone is courteous and not elderly if and only if he is not excited and not various. Someone who is both not disgusted and courteous is always elderly. If there is at least one people who is either not disgusted or not elderly, then Harris is not timid and Jed is not various. Harris being various implies that Vera is elderly and Lloyd is timid.
Vera is various.
neutral
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Herbert is not yellow.
neutral
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Herbert is not sane.
contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Aubrey is rational.
entailment
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Joe is yellow.
contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Luna is not yellow.
self_contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Rick is not yellow.
contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Aubrey is open.
entailment
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Herbert is not unhappy.
contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Luna is rational.
self_contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Luna is not open.
self_contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Hope is troubled.
contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Angus is yellow.
neutral
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Luna is not sane.
self_contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Hope is not yellow.
neutral
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Hope is sane.
entailment
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Luna is not troubled.
entailment
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Luna is not rational.
self_contradiction
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Aubrey is sane.
neutral
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Angus is rational.
neutral
Rick is yellow. Luna is not rational. Luna is not open. Aubrey is open. Herbert is sane. Joe is sane. Joe is troubled. Luna is not troubled. Herbert is unhappy. Angus is troubled. Joe is open. Luna is yellow.It can be concluded that Aubrey is not sane and Hope is not rational once knowing that Herbert is troubled. If all people are sane or not open, then Joe is not rational. Aubrey being not troubled or Aubrey being not rational implies that Herbert is not unhappy. If Hope is not yellow, then Herbert is troubled and Aubrey is rational, and vice versa. If there is at least one people who is both open and rational, then Hope is not troubled. Someone is rational and not yellow if and only if he is open. If there is someone who is not unhappy, then Angus is not troubled and Angus is not yellow. Someone being both not sane and not rational is equivalent to being yellow and not troubled. If Rick is rational or Rick is unhappy, then Herbert is troubled. Someone who is not troubled is always sane. Someone who is not rational or not unhappy is always open and not yellow. If there is someone who is either rational or sane, then Luna is not open.
Joe is sane.
entailment
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Abner is breakable.
neutral
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Alfred is not breakable.
self_contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Norman is not careful.
entailment
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Pierce is cautious.
self_contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Pierce is not cautious.
self_contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Norman is careful.
contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Travis is crazy.
neutral
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Kerry is not breakable.
neutral
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Pierce is not breakable.
contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Norman is not difficult.
contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Alfred is not cautious.
contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Pierce is not careful.
entailment
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Kerry is not cautious.
contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Norman is not crazy.
self_contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Alfred is terrible.
entailment
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Kerry is terrible.
neutral
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Travis is not terrible.
entailment
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Abner is careful.
neutral
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Pierce is crazy.
self_contradiction
Pierce is not crazy. Norman is breakable. Travis is not terrible. Alfred is terrible. Norman is crazy. Norman is difficult. Pierce is difficult. Kerry is cautious. Pierce is not cautious. Alfred is not breakable. Travis is not breakable. Kerry is careful.Norris being not cautious implies that Norman is not crazy. If someone is not difficult or he is terrible, then he is cautious. Pierce being breakable implies that Norman is difficult. If Travis is crazy, then Alfred is cautious and Pierce is not difficult. As long as someone is either not difficult or breakable, he is terrible and not careful. As long as someone is difficult, he is not crazy and breakable. If there is at least one people who is not breakable, then Kerry is careful. If Kerry is not careful and Alfred is cautious, then Pierce is not difficult. If there is someone who is both crazy and terrible, then Alfred is careful. If someone is not cautious, then he is crazy. If someone is terrible or not cautious, then he is difficult. If there is at least one people who is both not breakable and crazy, then Kerry is careful.
Pierce is difficult.
entailment
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Jesse is not big.
contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not better.
neutral
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Colin is imaginative.
neutral
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Lester is better.
neutral
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Colin is modern.
contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Hunter is not imaginative.
self_contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Jesse is not modern.
self_contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Harley is blue.
entailment
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Colin is not modern.
entailment
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Rufus is not imaginative.
neutral
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Lester is not imaginative.
neutral
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Claudia is not big.
contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Hunter is not big.
contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Claudia is not blue.
contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Claudia is big.
entailment
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Jesse is modern.
self_contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Hunter is imaginative.
self_contradiction
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Claudia is not better.
entailment
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Jesse is big.
entailment
Harley is big. Claudia is blue. Rufus is not better. Harley is not modern. Hunter is impossible. Harley is blue. Jesse is not blue. Hunter is not imaginative. Jesse is impossible. Colin is not big. Colin is not modern. Hunter is big.If there is someone who is imaginative, then Harley is modern and Harley is blue. Someone who is impossible is always both imaginative and not modern. Someone being both blue and modern is equivalent to being not impossible. If Rufus is not modern, then Hunter is not impossible. If there is at least one people who is not blue, then Jesse is not impossible. If someone is not imaginative or he is blue, then he is big. If all people are not impossible or modern, then Jesse is blue. All big people are not modern. As long as someone is not imaginative, he is big and modern. It can be concluded that Jesse is not blue once knowing that Jesse is not big and Hunter is not impossible. If Rufus is blue and Rufus is big, then Rufus is impossible. Harley being big implies that Claudia is not better and Jesse is impossible.
Hunter is modern.
self_contradiction

Dataset Card for "LogicNLI"

@inproceedings{tian-etal-2021-diagnosing,
    title = "Diagnosing the First-Order Logical Reasoning Ability Through {L}ogic{NLI}",
    author = "Tian, Jidong  and
      Li, Yitian  and
      Chen, Wenqing  and
      Xiao, Liqiang  and
      He, Hao  and
      Jin, Yaohui",
    editor = "Moens, Marie-Francine  and
      Huang, Xuanjing  and
      Specia, Lucia  and
      Yih, Scott Wen-tau",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
    month = nov,
    year = "2021",
    address = "Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.303",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.303",
    pages = "3738--3747",
    abstract = "Recently, language models (LMs) have achieved significant performance on many NLU tasks, which has spurred widespread interest for their possible applications in the scientific and social area. However, LMs have faced much criticism of whether they are truly capable of reasoning in NLU. In this work, we propose a diagnostic method for first-order logic (FOL) reasoning with a new proposed benchmark, LogicNLI. LogicNLI is an NLI-style dataset that effectively disentangles the target FOL reasoning from commonsense inference and can be used to diagnose LMs from four perspectives: accuracy, robustness, generalization, and interpretability. Experiments on BERT, RoBERTa, and XLNet, have uncovered the weaknesses of these LMs on FOL reasoning, which motivates future exploration to enhance the reasoning ability.",
}

https://github.com/omnilabNLP/LogicNLI

Downloads last month
216
Edit dataset card

Models trained or fine-tuned on tasksource/LogicNLI