text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Proxy ShapeSuper Point |
iSEnhance |
Connection |
Degenerate |
Nearly Rigid Point b Construction for proxy Shape |
Figure 2 Overview of region segmentation and proxy shape construction a We use DFT to analyze the 3D trajectories dividing them |
by comparing the frequency components contained in each trajectory The figure shows a segmentation result b The geometric center of |
the nonrigid region is set as the super point and it is linearly combined with nearly rigid points to construct the proxy shape |
other deformation regularization constraints should be sat |
isfied in the smooth motion sequence We propose a cam |
era motion refinement module called Temporallysmooth |
Procrustean Alignment TPA which aligns the shape se |
quence under the smoothness constraint as follows |
LtpaRS 1 |
2F1X |
i1RiSiRi1Si12 |
F3 |
where RdiagRiRiSO3 The TPA module |
3 estimates alignment matrix Rby the principle of mini |
mizing the difference between the 3D shapes of consecutive |
frames after rotation transformation as in Fig 1 b Dif |
ferent from GPA 1 TPA does not need to estimate the |
mean shape of the sequence which greatly simplifies the |
optimization and avoids overpenalizing nonisotropic de |
formations In addition we have experimentally verified |
that sequences aligned by the TPA module can have more |
similar lowrank and smoothing properties to the real se |
quences compared with GPA see Sec 43 and Fig 4 |
Under the NRSfM problem setting the TPA module can |
gradually put the shape sequence in a smooth state by ad |
justing the camera motion Assume that the estimated cam |
era poses are Ri i 1 Fand define the initialization |
of the alignment transformation as RpiRT |
i We denote |
RpiSiasSi where Siis in the camera coordinate Then |
we use the TPA module to estimate the correction rotation |
QdiagQias follows |
LQ |
tpa |
QS |
1 |
2F1X |
i1 |
QiSiQi1Si1 |
2 |
F |
1 |
2F1X |
i1PX |
j1Qi sijQi1 si1j2 |
24 |
where sijR31is the jth column of Si We take the Lie |
algebra 蠒iso3ofQias the optimization variable andthe derivative of the optimization objective LQ |
tpa4 with |
respect to 蠒ican be derived as |
LQ |
tpa |
蠒iPX |
j1 |
Qi sijT |
r1 |
ijr0 |
ij |
5 |
where rm |
ijQim simjQim1 sim1j and a |
represents the skewsymmetric matrix of vector a Once the |
gradient is calculated we can use traditional numerical op |
timization algorithms to solve model 4 eg BFGS LMF |
etc 33 see more derivation details and discussions in the |
Supplementary Material Supp Sec 1 |
TPA largely separates the rigid motion between consec |
utive frames in the sequence Sand makes it gradually con |
verge to a smooth state After reducing the interference of |
rigid motion we can better utilize the lowrank constraint to |
recover nonrigid deformation of the aligned sequence QS |
In the following we introduce the shape estimation method |
and unify them afterward |
33 SpatialWeighted Nonrigid Structure Model |
331 SpatialWeighted Nuclear Norm |
In realworld scenarios lowrank regularization can han |
dle many nonrigid deformation situations but always over |
penalize drastic deformations In the absence of priors to |
reconstruct the deformation we can give higher degrees of |
freedom for shape recovery by relaxing the lowrank con |
straint An object whose overall or local deformation is very |
drastic can lead to its 3D shape sequence 藛Sin the world co |
ordinate not satisfying the lowrank constraint But we can |
transform its spatial structure by linearly combining the tra |
jectories of 藛Sto degenerate the object to a lowrank state |
Given the affinity matrix 螞RPP we define the sequence |
ofproxy shape asS藛S螞 We can then utilize lowrank |
constraint to recover the proxy shapes which in turn re |
duces the strength of the constraint in the region of severe |
deformation to better recover 藛SWe use the nuclear norm with the rearrangement op |
erator g11 to build the lowrank constraint and denote |