Datasets:

wiselinjayajos

/

squad_v2_modified_for_t5_qg

like 0

generate questions: People with an acute coronary syndrome where no ST elevation is demonstrated (non-ST elevation ACS or NSTEACS) are treated with aspirin. Clopidogrel is added in many cases, particularly if the risk of cardiovascular events is felt to be high and early PCI is being considered. Depending on whether early PCI is planned, a factor Xa inhibitor or a potentiator of antithrombin (fondaparinux or low molecular weight heparin respectively) may be added. In very high-risk scenarios, inhibitors of the platelet glycoprotein αIIbβ3a receptor such as eptifibatide or tirofiban may be used.

When is clopidogrel removed? {sep_token} What is NSTEACS an abbreviation for? {sep_token} Clopidogrel is a form of what inhibitor? {sep_token} What inhibitors are used in low-risk scenarios? {sep_token} Eptifibatide has what kind of molecular weight? {sep_token}

generate questions: Cardiac rehabilitation benefits many who have experienced myocardial infarction, even if there has been substantial heart damage and resultant left ventricular failure; ideally other medical conditions that could interfere with participation should be managed optimally. It should start soon after discharge from hospital. The program may include lifestyle advice, exercise, social support, as well as recommendations about driving, flying, sport participation, stress management, and sexual intercourse.

Cardiac rehabilitation is not an option under what circumstances? {sep_token} Cardiac rehabilitation often recommends ceasing what activities? {sep_token} What should start immediately upon registering at the hospital? {sep_token} When are other medical conditions address? {sep_token}

generate questions: Some risk factors for death include age, hemodynamic parameters (such as heart failure, cardiac arrest on admission, systolic blood pressure, or Killip class of two or greater), ST-segment deviation, diabetes, serum creatinine, peripheral vascular disease, and elevation of cardiac markers. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction may increase the predictive power. Prognosis is worse if a mechanical complication such as papillary muscle or myocardial free wall rupture occurs. Morbidity and mortality from myocardial infarction has improved over the years due to better treatment.

How many classes of ST-segmentation are there? {sep_token} Prognosis improves after what complication? {sep_token} What has decreased over the years? {sep_token} What are some examples of ST-segment deviation? {sep_token} What are risk factors called? {sep_token}

generate questions: Complications may occur immediately following the heart attack (in the acute phase), or may need time to develop (a chronic problem). Acute complications may include heart failure if the damaged heart is no longer able to pump blood adequately around the body; aneurysm of the left ventricle myocardium; ventricular septal rupture or free wall rupture; mitral regurgitation, in particular if the infarction causes dysfunction of the papillary muscle; Dressler's syndrome; and abnormal heart rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and heart block. Longer-term complications include heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and an increased risk of a second MI.

What is Dressler's syndrome? {sep_token} What does an aneurysm of the left ventricle lead to? {sep_token} What does mitral regurgitation cause? {sep_token} Atrial fibrillation can only be what kind of problem? {sep_token}

generate questions: In contrast, IHD is becoming a more common cause of death in the developing world. For example, in India, IHD had become the leading cause of death by 2004, accounting for 1.46 million deaths (14% of total deaths) and deaths due to IHD were expected to double during 1985–2015. Globally, disability adjusted life years (DALYs) lost to ischemic heart disease are predicted to account for 5.5% of total DALYs in 2030, making it the second-most-important cause of disability (after unipolar depressive disorder), as well as the leading cause of death by this date.

What percentage of deaths does unipolar depressive disorder cause? {sep_token} How many people died from IHD from 1985-2015? {sep_token} What is the worldwide leading cause of death? {sep_token} What percentage of deaths will IHD be responsible for in 2030? {sep_token} When did IHD begin to be a bigger problem in the developing word? {sep_token}

generate questions: At common law, in general, a myocardial infarction is a disease, but may sometimes be an injury. This can create coverage issues in administration of no-fault insurance schemes such as workers' compensation. In general, a heart attack is not covered; however, it may be a work-related injury if it results, for example, from unusual emotional stress or unusual exertion. In addition, in some jurisdictions, heart attacks suffered by persons in particular occupations such as police officers may be classified as line-of-duty injuries by statute or policy. In some countries or states, a person having suffered from an MI may be prevented from participating in activity that puts other people's lives at risk, for example driving a car or flying an airplane.

What is a myocardial infarction is always considered to be? {sep_token} What occupation cannot have a heart attack classified as work-related? {sep_token} What typically covers an MI? {sep_token} When is an MI not considered a work-related injury? {sep_token} What generally treats MI as an injury? {sep_token}

generate questions: Before the 20th century, the term matter included ordinary matter composed of atoms and excluded other energy phenomena such as light or sound. This concept of matter may be generalized from atoms to include any objects having mass even when at rest, but this is ill-defined because an object's mass can arise from its (possibly massless) constituents' motion and interaction energies. Thus, matter does not have a universal definition, nor is it a fundamental concept in physics today. Matter is also used loosely as a general term for the substance that makes up all observable physical objects.

What did the term matter include after the 20th century? {sep_token} What are atoms composed of? {sep_token} What are two examples of matter? {sep_token} What can an object's mass not come from? {sep_token} Matter is currently considered to be what kind of concept? {sep_token}

generate questions: All the objects from everyday life that we can bump into, touch or squeeze are composed of atoms. This atomic matter is in turn made up of interacting subatomic particles—usually a nucleus of protons and neutrons, and a cloud of orbiting electrons. Typically, science considers these composite particles matter because they have both rest mass and volume. By contrast, massless particles, such as photons, are not considered matter, because they have neither rest mass nor volume. However, not all particles with rest mass have a classical volume, since fundamental particles such as quarks and leptons (sometimes equated with matter) are considered "point particles" with no effective size or volume. Nevertheless, quarks and leptons together make up "ordinary matter", and their interactions contribute to the effective volume of the composite particles that make up ordinary matter.

What orbits around electrons? {sep_token} What are protons and neutrons made out of? {sep_token} All particles with rest mass have what kind of volume? {sep_token} What cannot contribute to effective volume? {sep_token} What kind of size or volume do point particles have? {sep_token}

generate questions: Matter commonly exists in four states (or phases): solid, liquid and gas, and plasma. However, advances in experimental techniques have revealed other previously theoretical phases, such as Bose–Einstein condensates and fermionic condensates. A focus on an elementary-particle view of matter also leads to new phases of matter, such as the quark–gluon plasma. For much of the history of the natural sciences people have contemplated the exact nature of matter. The idea that matter was built of discrete building blocks, the so-called particulate theory of matter, was first put forward by the Greek philosophers Leucippus (~490 BC) and Democritus (~470–380 BC).

How many forms of solids are there? {sep_token} What theory states that matter can exist in four states? {sep_token} Who suggested the Bose-Einstein theory? {sep_token} What new form of plasma did Democritus discover? {sep_token} How long have scientists focused on an elementary-particle view? {sep_token}

generate questions: Matter should not be confused with mass, as the two are not quite the same in modern physics. For example, mass is a conserved quantity, which means that its value is unchanging through time, within closed systems. However, matter is not conserved in such systems, although this is not obvious in ordinary conditions on Earth, where matter is approximately conserved. Still, special relativity shows that matter may disappear by conversion into energy, even inside closed systems, and it can also be created from energy, within such systems. However, because mass (like energy) can neither be created nor destroyed, the quantity of mass and the quantity of energy remain the same during a transformation of matter (which represents a certain amount of energy) into non-material (i.e., non-matter) energy. This is also true in the reverse transformation of energy into matter.

What is considered the same as matter? {sep_token} What does special relativity show mass can do? {sep_token} What can be created or destroyed? {sep_token} What changes during the transformation of matter? {sep_token} What does not change in an open system? {sep_token}

generate questions: Different fields of science use the term matter in different, and sometimes incompatible, ways. Some of these ways are based on loose historical meanings, from a time when there was no reason to distinguish mass and matter. As such, there is no single universally agreed scientific meaning of the word "matter". Scientifically, the term "mass" is well-defined, but "matter" is not. Sometimes in the field of physics "matter" is simply equated with particles that exhibit rest mass (i.e., that cannot travel at the speed of light), such as quarks and leptons. However, in both physics and chemistry, matter exhibits both wave-like and particle-like properties, the so-called wave–particle duality.

What is always used the same way across fields? {sep_token} What is poorly defined besides matter? {sep_token} What does matter do in chemistry that it does not do in physics? {sep_token} What is the combination of mass and matter called in chemistry? {sep_token} What speed does matter travel at in physics? {sep_token}

generate questions: In the context of relativity, mass is not an additive quantity, in the sense that one can add the rest masses of particles in a system to get the total rest mass of the system. Thus, in relativity usually a more general view is that it is not the sum of rest masses, but the energy–momentum tensor that quantifies the amount of matter. This tensor gives the rest mass for the entire system. "Matter" therefore is sometimes considered as anything that contributes to the energy–momentum of a system, that is, anything that is not purely gravity. This view is commonly held in fields that deal with general relativity such as cosmology. In this view, light and other massless particles and fields are part of matter.

What type of quantity is mass? {sep_token} One can add the rest masses of particles in a system to get what? {sep_token} What can the energy-momentum tensor not do? {sep_token} What does gravity contribute to in a system? {sep_token} What field does not view matter as a contributor to energy-momentum? {sep_token}

generate questions: The reason for this is that in this definition, electromagnetic radiation (such as light) as well as the energy of electromagnetic fields contributes to the mass of systems, and therefore appears to add matter to them. For example, light radiation (or thermal radiation) trapped inside a box would contribute to the mass of the box, as would any kind of energy inside the box, including the kinetic energy of particles held by the box. Nevertheless, isolated individual particles of light (photons) and the isolated kinetic energy of massive particles, are normally not considered to be matter.[citation needed]

What type of radiation does not contribute mass? {sep_token} What is another name for electromagnetic radiation? {sep_token} What is another name for isolated kinetic energy of massive particles? {sep_token}

generate questions: A source of definition difficulty in relativity arises from two definitions of mass in common use, one of which is formally equivalent to total energy (and is thus observer dependent), and the other of which is referred to as rest mass or invariant mass and is independent of the observer. Only "rest mass" is loosely equated with matter (since it can be weighed). Invariant mass is usually applied in physics to unbound systems of particles. However, energies which contribute to the "invariant mass" may be weighed also in special circumstances, such as when a system that has invariant mass is confined and has no net momentum (as in the box example above). Thus, a photon with no mass may (confusingly) still add mass to a system in which it is trapped. The same is true of the kinetic energy of particles, which by definition is not part of their rest mass, but which does add rest mass to systems in which these particles reside (an example is the mass added by the motion of gas molecules of a bottle of gas, or by the thermal energy of any hot object).

How many difficulties are there in defining mass? {sep_token} What is invariant mass equivalent to? {sep_token} What type of systems is rest mass applied to? {sep_token} Invariant mass cannot be weighed when a system has no what? {sep_token} Kinetic energy cannot add what kind of mass to a system? {sep_token}

generate questions: Since such mass (kinetic energies of particles, the energy of trapped electromagnetic radiation and stored potential energy of repulsive fields) is measured as part of the mass of ordinary matter in complex systems, the "matter" status of "massless particles" and fields of force becomes unclear in such systems. These problems contribute to the lack of a rigorous definition of matter in science, although mass is easier to define as the total stress–energy above (this is also what is weighed on a scale, and what is the source of gravity).[citation needed]

What is electromagnetic radiation stored in? {sep_token} The mass of kinetic energy particles is not considered part of what? {sep_token} What tends to be clear in complex systems? {sep_token} What field has a clear definition of matter? {sep_token} Mass is harder to define as being what? {sep_token}

generate questions: A definition of "matter" more fine-scale than the atoms and molecules definition is: matter is made up of what atoms and molecules are made of, meaning anything made of positively charged protons, neutral neutrons, and negatively charged electrons. This definition goes beyond atoms and molecules, however, to include substances made from these building blocks that are not simply atoms or molecules, for example white dwarf matter—typically, carbon and oxygen nuclei in a sea of degenerate electrons. At a microscopic level, the constituent "particles" of matter such as protons, neutrons, and electrons obey the laws of quantum mechanics and exhibit wave–particle duality. At an even deeper level, protons and neutrons are made up of quarks and the force fields (gluons) that bind them together (see Quarks and leptons definition below).

What is made out of negatively charged protons? {sep_token} What type of charge do atoms have? {sep_token} This definition does not include what type of matter? {sep_token} What is located in a sea of protons? {sep_token} What are made up of leptons? {sep_token}

generate questions: Leptons (the most famous being the electron), and quarks (of which baryons, such as protons and neutrons, are made) combine to form atoms, which in turn form molecules. Because atoms and molecules are said to be matter, it is natural to phrase the definition as: ordinary matter is anything that is made of the same things that atoms and molecules are made of. (However, notice that one also can make from these building blocks matter that is not atoms or molecules.) Then, because electrons are leptons, and protons, and neutrons are made of quarks, this definition in turn leads to the definition of matter as being quarks and leptons, which are the two types of elementary fermions. Carithers and Grannis state: Ordinary matter is composed entirely of first-generation particles, namely the [up] and [down] quarks, plus the electron and its neutrino. (Higher generations particles quickly decay into first-generation particles, and thus are not commonly encountered.)

What is the most famous electron? {sep_token} What are quarks made from? {sep_token} Who determined that electrons were leptons? {sep_token} How many generation particles are there? {sep_token} What type of fermions are protons and neutrons? {sep_token}

generate questions: The quark–lepton definition of ordinary matter, however, identifies not only the elementary building blocks of matter, but also includes composites made from the constituents (atoms and molecules, for example). Such composites contain an interaction energy that holds the constituents together, and may constitute the bulk of the mass of the composite. As an example, to a great extent, the mass of an atom is simply the sum of the masses of its constituent protons, neutrons and electrons. However, digging deeper, the protons and neutrons are made up of quarks bound together by gluon fields (see dynamics of quantum chromodynamics) and these gluons fields contribute significantly to the mass of hadrons. In other words, most of what composes the "mass" of ordinary matter is due to the binding energy of quarks within protons and neutrons. For example, the sum of the mass of the three quarks in a nucleon is approximately 7001125000000000000♠12.5 MeV/c2, which is low compared to the mass of a nucleon (approximately 7002938000000000000♠938 MeV/c2). The bottom line is that most of the mass of everyday objects comes from the interaction energy of its elementary components.

What are atoms and molecules elementary forms of? {sep_token} What holds building blocks together? {sep_token} What is the mass of a proton? {sep_token} What binds an atom together? {sep_token} Most of the mass of binding energy is due to what? {sep_token}

generate questions: The Standard Model groups matter particles into three generations, where each generation consists of two quarks and two leptons. The first generation is the up and down quarks, the electron and the electron neutrino; the second includes the charm and strange quarks, the muon and the muon neutrino; the third generation consists of the top and bottom quarks and the tau and tau neutrino. The most natural explanation for this would be that quarks and leptons of higher generations are excited states of the first generations. If this turns out to be the case, it would imply that quarks and leptons are composite particles, rather than elementary particles.

What model has two generations? {sep_token} Which generation has the up and down muon and muon neutrino? {sep_token} What type of particles are tau and tau neutrino? {sep_token} What generation has charm and strange muon? {sep_token} How many electrons are there in the generations? {sep_token}

generate questions: Baryonic matter is the part of the universe that is made of baryons (including all atoms). This part of the universe does not include dark energy, dark matter, black holes or various forms of degenerate matter, such as compose white dwarf stars and neutron stars. Microwave light seen by Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), suggests that only about 4.6% of that part of the universe within range of the best telescopes (that is, matter that may be visible because light could reach us from it), is made of baryonic matter. About 23% is dark matter, and about 72% is dark energy.

What is dark energy composed of? {sep_token} What probe saw white dwarf stars? {sep_token} What percentage of the universe are black holes? {sep_token} What percentage of the universe can be seen by telescope? {sep_token} What type of light accounts for 72% of the universe? {sep_token}

generate questions: In physics, degenerate matter refers to the ground state of a gas of fermions at a temperature near absolute zero. The Pauli exclusion principle requires that only two fermions can occupy a quantum state, one spin-up and the other spin-down. Hence, at zero temperature, the fermions fill up sufficient levels to accommodate all the available fermions—and in the case of many fermions, the maximum kinetic energy (called the Fermi energy) and the pressure of the gas becomes very large, and depends on the number of fermions rather than the temperature, unlike normal states of matter.

What is the name of the principle for the ground state of gas? {sep_token} What depends on the temperature at absolute zero? {sep_token} What is the minimum kinetic energy called? {sep_token} What shrinks to accommodate fermions? {sep_token} What is the pressure of the gas called? {sep_token}

generate questions: Strange matter is a particular form of quark matter, usually thought of as a liquid of up, down, and strange quarks. It is contrasted with nuclear matter, which is a liquid of neutrons and protons (which themselves are built out of up and down quarks), and with non-strange quark matter, which is a quark liquid that contains only up and down quarks. At high enough density, strange matter is expected to be color superconducting. Strange matter is hypothesized to occur in the core of neutron stars, or, more speculatively, as isolated droplets that may vary in size from femtometers (strangelets) to kilometers (quark stars).

What is quark matter usually thought of as? {sep_token} What is nuclear matter similar to? {sep_token} At low density, what is expected of strange matter? {sep_token} What kind of core does nuclear matter occur in? {sep_token} What has Strange matter been definitely proven to occur as? {sep_token}

generate questions: In bulk, matter can exist in several different forms, or states of aggregation, known as phases, depending on ambient pressure, temperature and volume. A phase is a form of matter that has a relatively uniform chemical composition and physical properties (such as density, specific heat, refractive index, and so forth). These phases include the three familiar ones (solids, liquids, and gases), as well as more exotic states of matter (such as plasmas, superfluids, supersolids, Bose–Einstein condensates, ...). A fluid may be a liquid, gas or plasma. There are also paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases of magnetic materials. As conditions change, matter may change from one phase into another. These phenomena are called phase transitions, and are studied in the field of thermodynamics. In nanomaterials, the vastly increased ratio of surface area to volume results in matter that can exhibit properties entirely different from those of bulk material, and not well described by any bulk phase (see nanomaterials for more details).

What are phases known as? {sep_token} What is a phase not dependent on? {sep_token} How many phases are there total? {sep_token} What are examples of paramagnetic phases? {sep_token} What field studies nanomaterials? {sep_token}

generate questions: In particle physics and quantum chemistry, antimatter is matter that is composed of the antiparticles of those that constitute ordinary matter. If a particle and its antiparticle come into contact with each other, the two annihilate; that is, they may both be converted into other particles with equal energy in accordance with Einstein's equation E = mc2. These new particles may be high-energy photons (gamma rays) or other particle–antiparticle pairs. The resulting particles are endowed with an amount of kinetic energy equal to the difference between the rest mass of the products of the annihilation and the rest mass of the original particle–antiparticle pair, which is often quite large.

What is composed of antimatter? {sep_token} What happens when two antiparticles collide? {sep_token} What are particle-antiparticle pairs that are not high-energy called? {sep_token} What kind of energy do particle-antiparticle pairs have more of than they had originally? {sep_token} Who discovered quantum chemistry? {sep_token}

generate questions: Antimatter is not found naturally on Earth, except very briefly and in vanishingly small quantities (as the result of radioactive decay, lightning or cosmic rays). This is because antimatter that came to exist on Earth outside the confines of a suitable physics laboratory would almost instantly meet the ordinary matter that Earth is made of, and be annihilated. Antiparticles and some stable antimatter (such as antihydrogen) can be made in tiny amounts, but not in enough quantity to do more than test a few of its theoretical properties.

Where is antimatter found naturally in large quantities? {sep_token} What does antimatter annihilate? {sep_token} Where is ordinary matter created? {sep_token} What is an example of an antiparticle? {sep_token} Large quantities of what can be created for testing? {sep_token}

generate questions: There is considerable speculation both in science and science fiction as to why the observable universe is apparently almost entirely matter, and whether other places are almost entirely antimatter instead. In the early universe, it is thought that matter and antimatter were equally represented, and the disappearance of antimatter requires an asymmetry in physical laws called the charge parity (or CP symmetry) violation. CP symmetry violation can be obtained from the Standard Model, but at this time the apparent asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the great unsolved problems in physics. Possible processes by which it came about are explored in more detail under baryogenesis.

What is the disappearance of matter linked to? {sep_token} When was there more antimatter than matter? {sep_token} What problem has physics solved? {sep_token} Where is the Standard Model found? {sep_token} What field of study speculates about science fiction? {sep_token}

generate questions: In astrophysics and cosmology, dark matter is matter of unknown composition that does not emit or reflect enough electromagnetic radiation to be observed directly, but whose presence can be inferred from gravitational effects on visible matter. Observational evidence of the early universe and the big bang theory require that this matter have energy and mass, but is not composed of either elementary fermions (as above) OR gauge bosons. The commonly accepted view is that most of the dark matter is non-baryonic in nature. As such, it is composed of particles as yet unobserved in the laboratory. Perhaps they are supersymmetric particles, which are not Standard Model particles, but relics formed at very high energies in the early phase of the universe and still floating about.

What does dark matter emit to make it visible? {sep_token} What effect on other matter allows electromagnetic radiation to be visible? {sep_token} What is baryonic in nature? {sep_token} What does dark matter form? {sep_token} Supersymmetric particles are part of what Model? {sep_token}

generate questions: The pre-Socratics were among the first recorded speculators about the underlying nature of the visible world. Thales (c. 624 BC–c. 546 BC) regarded water as the fundamental material of the world. Anaximander (c. 610 BC–c. 546 BC) posited that the basic material was wholly characterless or limitless: the Infinite (apeiron). Anaximenes (flourished 585 BC, d. 528 BC) posited that the basic stuff was pneuma or air. Heraclitus (c. 535–c. 475 BC) seems to say the basic element is fire, though perhaps he means that all is change. Empedocles (c. 490–430 BC) spoke of four elements of which everything was made: earth, water, air, and fire. Meanwhile, Parmenides argued that change does not exist, and Democritus argued that everything is composed of minuscule, inert bodies of all shapes called atoms, a philosophy called atomism. All of these notions had deep philosophical problems.

When did Socratics live? {sep_token} What did Parmenides believe was the fundamental material of the world? {sep_token} What is the name for the philosophical problems of understanding the nature of the world? {sep_token} How many elements did Democritus name? {sep_token} What did Parmenides say everything was made of? {sep_token}

generate questions: For example, a horse eats grass: the horse changes the grass into itself; the grass as such does not persist in the horse, but some aspect of it—its matter—does. The matter is not specifically described (e.g., as atoms), but consists of whatever persists in the change of substance from grass to horse. Matter in this understanding does not exist independently (i.e., as a substance), but exists interdependently (i.e., as a "principle") with form and only insofar as it underlies change. It can be helpful to conceive of the relationship of matter and form as very similar to that between parts and whole. For Aristotle, matter as such can only receive actuality from form; it has no activity or actuality in itself, similar to the way that parts as such only have their existence in a whole (otherwise they would be independent wholes).

What exists independently? {sep_token} Who said matter had actuality in and of itself? {sep_token} Aristotle said parts have existence outside of what? {sep_token} What does grass turn the horse into? {sep_token}

generate questions: For Descartes, matter has only the property of extension, so its only activity aside from locomotion is to exclude other bodies: this is the mechanical philosophy. Descartes makes an absolute distinction between mind, which he defines as unextended, thinking substance, and matter, which he defines as unthinking, extended substance. They are independent things. In contrast, Aristotle defines matter and the formal/forming principle as complementary principles that together compose one independent thing (substance). In short, Aristotle defines matter (roughly speaking) as what things are actually made of (with a potential independent existence), but Descartes elevates matter to an actual independent thing in itself.

What philosophy did Aristotle describe? {sep_token} What did Aristotle define as distinct from matter? {sep_token} How did Aristotle elevate matter? {sep_token} What activity does locomotion have? {sep_token} How does Descartes use matter and the formal/forming principle? {sep_token}

generate questions: Isaac Newton (1643–1727) inherited Descartes' mechanical conception of matter. In the third of his "Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy", Newton lists the universal qualities of matter as "extension, hardness, impenetrability, mobility, and inertia". Similarly in Optics he conjectures that God created matter as "solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, movable particles", which were "...even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces". The "primary" properties of matter were amenable to mathematical description, unlike "secondary" qualities such as color or taste. Like Descartes, Newton rejected the essential nature of secondary qualities.

When was Descartes born? {sep_token} What did Descartes write? {sep_token} What did Newton reject that Descartes did not? {sep_token} What did Descartes say were the universal qualities of matter? {sep_token} Both primary and secondary properties are suited to what form of description? {sep_token}

generate questions: There is an entire literature concerning the "structure of matter", ranging from the "electrical structure" in the early 20th century, to the more recent "quark structure of matter", introduced today with the remark: Understanding the quark structure of matter has been one of the most important advances in contemporary physics.[further explanation needed] In this connection, physicists speak of matter fields, and speak of particles as "quantum excitations of a mode of the matter field". And here is a quote from de Sabbata and Gasperini: "With the word "matter" we denote, in this context, the sources of the interactions, that is spinor fields (like quarks and leptons), which are believed to be the fundamental components of matter, or scalar fields, like the Higgs particles, which are used to introduced mass in a gauge theory (and that, however, could be composed of more fundamental fermion fields)."[further explanation needed]

When did de Sabbata and Gasperini write? {sep_token} What theory came after the quark structure of matter? {sep_token} Understanding electrical structure has lead to important advances in what field? {sep_token} Who described particles as quantum excitations? {sep_token} What theory uses spinor fields? {sep_token}

generate questions: In the late 19th century with the discovery of the electron, and in the early 20th century, with the discovery of the atomic nucleus, and the birth of particle physics, matter was seen as made up of electrons, protons and neutrons interacting to form atoms. Today, we know that even protons and neutrons are not indivisible, they can be divided into quarks, while electrons are part of a particle family called leptons. Both quarks and leptons are elementary particles, and are currently seen as being the fundamental constituents of matter.

What field of physics began in the 19th century? {sep_token} What do atoms form? {sep_token} What are quarks divided into? {sep_token} Leptons are made up of what? {sep_token} We now know that quarks and leptons are not what? {sep_token}

generate questions: These quarks and leptons interact through four fundamental forces: gravity, electromagnetism, weak interactions, and strong interactions. The Standard Model of particle physics is currently the best explanation for all of physics, but despite decades of efforts, gravity cannot yet be accounted for at the quantum level; it is only described by classical physics (see quantum gravity and graviton). Interactions between quarks and leptons are the result of an exchange of force-carrying particles (such as photons) between quarks and leptons. The force-carrying particles are not themselves building blocks. As one consequence, mass and energy (which cannot be created or destroyed) cannot always be related to matter (which can be created out of non-matter particles such as photons, or even out of pure energy, such as kinetic energy). Force carriers are usually not considered matter: the carriers of the electric force (photons) possess energy (see Planck relation) and the carriers of the weak force (W and Z bosons) are massive, but neither are considered matter either. However, while these particles are not considered matter, they do contribute to the total mass of atoms, subatomic particles, and all systems that contain them.

How many quarks and leptons are there? {sep_token} What model satisfactorily explains gravity? {sep_token} Interactions between quarks and leptons are the exchange of what? {sep_token} Mass and energy can always be compared to what? {sep_token} What relation explains the carriers of the electric force? {sep_token}

generate questions: The term "matter" is used throughout physics in a bewildering variety of contexts: for example, one refers to "condensed matter physics", "elementary matter", "partonic" matter, "dark" matter, "anti"-matter, "strange" matter, and "nuclear" matter. In discussions of matter and antimatter, normal matter has been referred to by Alfvén as koinomatter (Gk. common matter). It is fair to say that in physics, there is no broad consensus as to a general definition of matter, and the term "matter" usually is used in conjunction with a specifying modifier.

Physics has broadly agreed on the definition of what? {sep_token} Who coined the term partonic matter? {sep_token} What is another name for anti-matter? {sep_token} Matter usually does not need to be used in conjunction with what? {sep_token} What field of study has a variety of unusual contexts? {sep_token}