jonatasgrosman's picture
Update README.md
907a582
|
raw
history blame
4.22 kB
---
language:
- es
license: apache-2.0
tags:
- whisper-event
- generated_from_trainer
datasets:
- mozilla-foundation/common_voice_11_0
metrics:
- wer
- cer
model-index:
- name: Whisper Large Spanish
results:
- task:
name: Automatic Speech Recognition
type: automatic-speech-recognition
dataset:
name: mozilla-foundation/common_voice_11_0 es
type: mozilla-foundation/common_voice_11_0
config: es
split: test
args: es
metrics:
- name: WER
type: wer
value: 4.673613637544826
- name: CER
type: cer
value: 1.5573247819517182
- task:
name: Automatic Speech Recognition
type: automatic-speech-recognition
dataset:
name: google/fleurs es_419
type: google/fleurs
config: es_419
split: test
args: es_419
metrics:
- name: WER
type: wer
value: 5.396216546072705
- name: CER
type: cer
value: 3.450427960057061
---
# Whisper Large Spanish
This model is a fine-tuned version of [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) on Spanish using the train split of [Common Voice 11](https://huggingface.co/datasets/mozilla-foundation/common_voice_11_0).
## Usage
```python
from transformers import pipeline
transcriber = pipeline(
"automatic-speech-recognition",
model="jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11"
)
transcriber.model.config.forced_decoder_ids = (
transcriber.tokenizer.get_decoder_prompt_ids(
language="es",
task="transcribe"
)
)
transcription = transcriber("path/to/my_audio.wav")
```
## Evaluation
I've performed the evaluation of the model using the test split of two datasets, the [Common Voice 11](https://huggingface.co/datasets/mozilla-foundation/common_voice_11_0) (same dataset used for the fine-tuning) and the [Fleurs](https://huggingface.co/datasets/google/fleurs) (dataset not seen during the fine-tuning). As Whisper can transcribe casing and punctuation, I've performed the model evaluation in 2 different scenarios, one using the raw text and the other using the normalized text (lowercase + removal of punctuations). Additionally, for the Fleurs dataset, I've evaluated the model in a scenario where there are no transcriptions of numerical values since the way these values are described in this dataset is different from how they are described in the dataset used in fine-tuning (Common Voice), so it is expected that this difference in the way of describing numerical values will affect the performance of the model for this type of transcription in Fleurs.
### Common Voice 11
| | CER | WER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11](https://huggingface.co/jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11) | 2.43 | 8.85 |
| [jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11](https://huggingface.co/jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11) + text normalization | 1.56 | 4.67 |
| [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) | 3.71 | 12.34 |
| [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) + text normalization | 2.45 | 6.30 |
### Fleurs
| | CER | WER |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11](https://huggingface.co/jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11) | 3.06 | 9.11 |
| [jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11](https://huggingface.co/jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11) + text normalization | 3.45 | 5.40 |
| [jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11](https://huggingface.co/jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11) + keep only non-numeric samples | 1.83 | 7.57 |
| [jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11](https://huggingface.co/jonatasgrosman/whisper-large-es-cv11) + text normalization + keep only non-numeric samples | 2.36 | 4.14 |
| [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) | 2.30 | 8.50 |
| [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) + text normalization | 2.76 | 4.79 |
| [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) + keep only non-numeric samples | 1.93 | 7.33 |
| [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) + text normalization + keep only non-numeric samples | 2.50 | 4.28 |