Face Reality: Politicizing AI Models Won't Help You Catch Up
Let's be real: technology is inherently neutral. The safety filters in AI models aren’t censorship—they're mandated by social responsibility to keep information secure and block malicious content. China's models use these measures to protect data and prevent harmful misinformation, not to serve any political agenda.
Those pushing for “de-censorship” are merely using politics to interfere with real technological progress. They’re trying to shove their biased ideology into these systems, which only creates chaos and wrecks proper tech communication.
China's breakthroughs in AI come from genuine independent innovation and rigorous development—not from kowtowing to the whims of ill-intentioned detractors. Stop twisting necessary safety measures into claims of political oppression. This is nothing but deliberate distortion and obfuscation.
You don't know Chinese law; that's why DeepSeek's political censorship is intentionally poorly done. It's like the developers complied reluctantly, similar to how the U.S. censors NSFW content with low-quality safeguards—even Sam Altman is in favor of spicy stories. Local policies and laws can affect the usefulness of AI models. ChatGPT is lobotomized in several areas that aren't even illegal, just because of your so-called "social responsibility." Removing censorship is depoliticizing as long as local laws are followed.