Spaces:
Running
Running
| - Level of detail = description of context and performance | |
| - Suggestion for "improvement" given | |
| - "written" feedback | |
| - Link | |
| - How specific was the evaluator in describing the behavior? => exact language of Q1 | |
| - get rid of overall model just use component model | |
| - get rid of true comments | |
| - Medical education requires high-quality *written* feedback, but evaluating these *supervisor narrative comments* is time-consuming. The QuAL score has validity evidence for measuring the quality of short comments in this context. We developed a NLP/ML-powered tool to assess written comment quality via the QuAL score with high accuracy. Try it for yourself! | |
| - include confidence bar | |
| - change out to formal descriptions | |
| # Paper | |
| - zotero refs | |
| - methods comments | |
| - flowchart figure | |
| - final word clouds | |
| - add within-1 accuracy numbers | |