Small feedback ๐Ÿ’œ

#2
by merve HF staff - opened
scikit-learn org
โ€ข
edited May 14, 2023

Hello ๐Ÿ‘‹ @LenixC great work, I love the multiple tabs where you can do model selection and hyperparameter tuning!
It would be super cool if you would add a small visualization of data in an intermediate place (maybe side by side with final result or next to dropdown itself?)
Also if you could elaborate more on what is going on in each tab in a simple basic language in the description it would be better for viewers.

Also shouldn't the strategies be radio button instead of checkbox?

scikit-learn org

Hey, @merve ! Yeah, I can definitely clarify what is going on for the reader. I originally was thinking of these spaces as sort of addendums to the already existing documentation and not as standalone interactive documentation.

So, the logic for using checkboxes for strategies is that the original post has a single graph that compares all of the learning strategies. I like seeing them all together, but it's a bit visually busy for me to actually just compare two or three. So, I like the checkboxes to solve that problem.

I can add visualizations, for sure! I think for moons and circles it is pretty obvious. However, for digits and iris, it's a bit less clear. What do you think about showing a handful of the handwritten numbers for the digits dataset? And for iris, I could either do PCA or select a 2 feature subset. PCA is more valuable for data representaiont, but I think sepal-length, sepal-height might be more intuitive for a viewer. What do you think?

Thanks!

scikit-learn org

@LenixC ah okay, sorry then. I think it's fine to add iris with reduced dimensions. For digits it's a bit more complicated IMHO

scikit-learn org

@merve , thank you for all of the great suggestions! I added the previews of the datasets.
For digits, I played around with a few things, but I do think the most intuitive representation of the data is just a subset of the digits.
Let me know what you think!

Sign up or log in to comment