Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
# LLM Judge | |
| [Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05685) | [Leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboard) | | |
In this package, you can use MT-bench questions and prompts to evaluate your models with LLM-as-a-judge. | |
MT-bench is a set of challenging multi-turn open-ended questions for evaluating chat assistants. | |
To automate the evaluation process, we prompt strong LLMs like GPT-4 to act as judges and assess the quality of the models' responses. | |
## Contents | |
- [Install](#install) | |
- [Review Pre-Generated Model Answers and Judgments](#review-pre-generated-model-answers-and-judgments) | |
- [MT-Bench](#mt-bench) | |
- [Agreement Computation](#agreement-computation) | |
- [Datasets](#datasets) | |
- [Citation](#citation) | |
## Install | |
``` | |
git clone https://github.com/lm-sys/FastChat.git | |
cd FastChat | |
pip install -e ".[model_worker,llm_judge]" | |
``` | |
## Review Pre-Generated Model Answers and Judgments | |
We provide pre-generated model answers and judgments for some models. | |
You can view them at this [demo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/mt-bench). | |
To download the pre-generated data, use | |
``` | |
python3 download_mt_bench_pregenerated.py | |
``` | |
After downloading the data, you can view them locally by | |
``` | |
python3 qa_browser.py --share | |
``` | |
You can use this QA browser to view the answers generated by you later. | |
## MT-Bench | |
### Evaluate a model on MT-bench | |
#### Step 1. Generate model answers to MT-bench questions | |
``` | |
python gen_model_answer.py --model-path [MODEL-PATH] --model-id [MODEL-ID] | |
``` | |
Arguments: | |
- `[MODEL-PATH]` is the path to the weights, which can be a local folder or a Hugging Face repo ID. | |
- `[MODEL-ID]` is a name you give to the model. | |
e.g., | |
``` | |
python gen_model_answer.py --model-path lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5 --model-id vicuna-7b-v1.5 | |
``` | |
The answers will be saved to `data/mt_bench/model_answer/[MODEL-ID].jsonl`. | |
To make sure FastChat loads the correct prompt template, see the supported models and how to add a new model [here](../../docs/model_support.md#how-to-support-a-new-model). | |
You can also specify `--num-gpus-per-model` for model parallelism (needed for large 65B models) and `--num-gpus-total` to parallelize answer generation with multiple GPUs. | |
> Note: if you experience slow answer generation, please refer to [Other Backends](#other-backends) section to use inference engine to speed up by 20x. | |
#### Step 2. Generate GPT-4 judgments | |
There are several options to use GPT-4 as a judge, such as pairwise winrate and single-answer grading. | |
In MT-bench, we recommend single-answer grading as the default mode. | |
This mode asks GPT-4 to grade and give a score to model's answer directly without pairwise comparison. | |
For each turn, GPT-4 will give a score on a scale of 10. We then compute the average score on all turns. | |
``` | |
export OPENAI_API_KEY=XXXXXX # set the OpenAI API key | |
python gen_judgment.py --model-list [LIST-OF-MODEL-ID] --parallel [num-concurrent-api-call] | |
``` | |
e.g., | |
``` | |
python gen_judgment.py --model-list vicuna-13b-v1.3 alpaca-13b llama-13b claude-v1 gpt-3.5-turbo gpt-4 --parallel 2 | |
``` | |
The judgments will be saved to `data/mt_bench/model_judgment/gpt-4_single.jsonl` | |
#### Step 3. Show MT-bench scores | |
- Show the scores for selected models | |
``` | |
python show_result.py --model-list vicuna-13b-v1.3 alpaca-13b llama-13b claude-v1 gpt-3.5-turbo gpt-4 | |
``` | |
- Show all scores | |
``` | |
python show_result.py | |
``` | |
--- | |
### Other grading options | |
Besides score-based single-answer grading, we also support two additional grading options based on win rates: | |
- `pariwise-baseline`: run pairwise comparison against a baseline model. | |
- `pairwise-all`: run pairwise comparison between all model pairs on all questions. | |
#### Option 2: pairwise comparison against a baseline (default: gpt-3.5-turbo) | |
- Generate GPT-4 judgments | |
``` | |
python gen_judgment.py --mode pairwise-baseline --model-list vicuna-13b-v1.3 alpaca-13b llama-13b --parallel 2 | |
``` | |
The judgments will be saved to `data/mt_bench/model_judgment/gpt-4_pair.jsonl` | |
- Show results | |
``` | |
python show_result.py --mode pairwise-baseline | |
``` | |
#### Option 3: Run GPT-4 judge with all pair comparisons | |
Another option is to run pairwise comparisons on all possible pairs. | |
This could be more expensive when #models increases, but it gives you a more comprehensive information. | |
``` | |
python gen_judgment.py --mode pairwise-all --model-list [LIST-OF-MODEL-ID] --parallel [num-concurrent-api-call] | |
``` | |
``` | |
python show_result.py --mode pairwise-all | |
``` | |
### How to get GPT-3.5/GPT-4/Claude's answer? | |
- `python gen_api_answer.py --model [MODEL-NAME]` to generate GPT-3.5/4 and Claude's answers. | |
### How to plot the radar figure? | |
You can use this [colab notebook](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/15O3Y8Rxq37PuMlArE291P4OC6ia37PQK#scrollTo=5i8R0l-XqkgO) to plot the radar figure for MT-bench. | |
<img src="data/mt_bench/misc/radar.png" width="600" height="450"> | |
### Other backends | |
We can also use vLLM for answer generation, which can be faster for the models supported by vLLM. | |
1. Launch a vLLM worker | |
``` | |
vllm serve [MODEL-PATH] --dtype auto | |
``` | |
- Arguments: | |
- `[MODEL-PATH]` is the path to the weights, which can be a local folder or a Hugging Face repo ID. | |
2. Generate the answers | |
``` | |
python gen_api_answer.py --model [MODEL-NAME] --openai-api-base http://localhost:8000/v1 --parallel 50 | |
``` | |
- Arguments: | |
- `[MODEL-NAME]` is the name of the model from Step 1. | |
- `--parallel` is the number of concurrent API calls to the vLLM worker. | |
## Agreement Computation | |
We released 3.3K human annotations for model responses generated by 6 models in response to 80 MT-bench questions. The dataset is available at [lmsys/mt_bench_human_judgments](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmsys/mt_bench_human_judgments). | |
This Colab [notebook](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1ctgygDRJhVGUJTQy8-bRZCl1WNcT8De6?usp=sharing) shows how to compute the agreement between humans and GPT-4 judge with the dataset. Our results show that humans and GPT-4 judge achieve over 80\% agreement, the same level of agreement between humans. | |
## Datasets | |
- [Chatbot Arena Conversation Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmsys/chatbot_arena_conversations) | |
- [MT-bench Human Annotation Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmsys/mt_bench_human_judgments) | |
## Citation | |
Please cite the following paper if you find the code or datasets helpful. | |
``` | |
@misc{zheng2023judging, | |
title={Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena}, | |
author={Lianmin Zheng and Wei-Lin Chiang and Ying Sheng and Siyuan Zhuang and Zhanghao Wu and Yonghao Zhuang and Zi Lin and Zhuohan Li and Dacheng Li and Eric. P Xing and Hao Zhang and Joseph E. Gonzalez and Ion Stoica}, | |
year={2023}, | |
eprint={2306.05685}, | |
archivePrefix={arXiv}, | |
primaryClass={cs.CL} | |
} | |
``` | |