Configuration Parsing
Warning:
In config.json: "quantization_config.bits" must be an integer
MaziyarPanahi/Llama-3-70B-Instruct-DPO-v0.4
This model is a fine-tune (DPO) of meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct
model.
Quantized GGUF
All GGUF models are available here: MaziyarPanahi/Llama-3-70B-Instruct-DPO-v0.4-GGUF
Prompt Template
This model uses ChatML
prompt template:
<|im_start|>system
{System}
<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>user
{User}
<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
{Assistant}
How to use
You can use this model by using MaziyarPanahi/Llama-3-70B-Instruct-DPO-v0.4
as the model name in Hugging Face's
transformers library.
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, TextStreamer
from transformers import pipeline
import torch
model_id = "MaziyarPanahi/Llama-3-70B-Instruct-DPO-v0.4"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_id,
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="auto",
trust_remote_code=True,
# attn_implementation="flash_attention_2"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
model_id,
trust_remote_code=True
)
streamer = TextStreamer(tokenizer)
pipeline = pipeline(
"text-generation",
model=model,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
model_kwargs={"torch_dtype": torch.bfloat16},
streamer=streamer
)
# Then you can use the pipeline to generate text.
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a pirate chatbot who always responds in pirate speak!"},
{"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"},
]
prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=False,
add_generation_prompt=True
)
terminators = [
tokenizer.eos_token_id,
tokenizer.convert_tokens_to_ids("<|im_end|>"),
tokenizer.convert_tokens_to_ids("<|eot_id|>") # safer to have this too
]
outputs = pipeline(
prompt,
max_new_tokens=2048,
eos_token_id=terminators,
do_sample=True,
temperature=0.6,
top_p=0.95,
)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"][len(prompt):])
Sample Response
<|im_start|>system
You are a helpful assistant.<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>user
describe about pros and cons of docker system.<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
Here are the pros and cons of the Docker system:
**Pros:**
1. **Lightweight**: Docker containers are lightweight and use fewer resources compared to traditional virtual machines.
2. **Isolation**: Docker provides a high level of isolation between containers, ensuring that each application runs independently without interfering with others.
3. **Portability**: Docker containers are highly portable and can run on any system that supports Docker, without requiring specific dependencies or configurations.
4. **Efficient Use of Resources**: Docker containers can share the same kernel and use fewer resources, making them more efficient than traditional virtual machines.
5. **Fast Deployment**: Docker containers can be spun up quickly, making it ideal for rapid deployment and scaling of applications.
6. **Easy Maintenance**: Docker provides a simple way to manage and update applications, with features like rolling updates and rollbacks.
7. **Security**: Docker provides a secure environment for applications, with features like network isolation and encryption.
8. **Large Ecosystem**: Docker has a large and active ecosystem, with a wide range of tools and plugins available for various tasks.
9. **Version Control**: Docker provides an easy way to manage different versions of an application, with features like version tagging and rollbacks.
10. **Cost-Effective**: Docker can help reduce costs by minimizing the need for virtual machines and reducing the overhead of resource allocation.
**Cons:**
1. **Steep Learning Curve**: Docker has a complex architecture and requires a good understanding of containerization, networking, and storage.
2. **Overhead**: While Docker containers are lightweight, they still require some overhead in terms of resources and management.
3. **Security Risks**: If not properly configured, Docker containers can introduce security risks, such as unauthorized access to the host system.
4. **Limited Support for GUI Applications**: Docker is primarily designed for running command-line applications, and running GUI applications can be challenging.
5. **Networking Complexity**: Docker's networking model can be complex, especially in large-scale deployments.
6. **Storage Complexity**: Docker's storage model can be complex, especially when dealing with persistent data.
7. **Limited Support for Legacy Applications**: Docker is designed for modern, cloud-native applications, and may not be suitable for legacy applications that rely on older technologies.
8. **Dependence on Docker Hub**: Docker relies heavily on Docker Hub, which can be a single point of failure if the hub is down or experiencing issues.
9. **Orchestration Complexity**: Docker provides a built-in orchestration tool, Docker Swarm, but it can be complex to set up and manage.
10. **Vendor Lock-in**: Docker is a proprietary technology, and while it has a large ecosystem, it can be difficult to switch to alternative containerization platforms.
Overall, Docker provides a powerful and flexible way to deploy and manage applications, but it requires careful planning, configuration, and management to ensure optimal performance and security.
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Avg. | 78.89 |
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) | 72.61 |
HellaSwag (10-Shot) | 86.03 |
MMLU (5-Shot) | 80.50 |
TruthfulQA (0-shot) | 63.26 |
Winogrande (5-shot) | 83.58 |
GSM8k (5-shot) | 87.34 |
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Avg. | 78.89 |
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) | 72.61 |
HellaSwag (10-Shot) | 86.03 |
MMLU (5-Shot) | 80.50 |
TruthfulQA (0-shot) | 63.26 |
Winogrande (5-shot) | 83.58 |
GSM8k (5-shot) | 87.34 |
- Downloads last month
- 10
Model tree for LoneStriker/Llama-3-70B-Instruct-DPO-v0.4-3.5bpw-h6-exl2
Base model
meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B
Finetuned
meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct
Dataset used to train LoneStriker/Llama-3-70B-Instruct-DPO-v0.4-3.5bpw-h6-exl2
Evaluation results
- normalized accuracy on AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard72.610
- normalized accuracy on HellaSwag (10-Shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard86.030
- accuracy on MMLU (5-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard80.500
- mc2 on TruthfulQA (0-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard63.260
- accuracy on Winogrande (5-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard83.580
- accuracy on GSM8k (5-shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard87.340