id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 8
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1e1cd7fb56025c37 | Dude, Chaffehamp, it is obvious you love Mitch because he is going to your precious USC, but the fact of the matter is that I am correct here. That is not and never will be an Arkansas Single season passing record. I know it hurts. I know. Please, though, do the right thing and don't change it just because you are a fanboy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
00dd7931749358af | MySpace?
Is the MySpace page that is linked actually maintained by the group, or is it a fansite? If it is a fansite, it should not be linked to. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3a8bc18314e95d4f | People like you are enemy of the peace, think wider be an honest man, not unhappy man cheers | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
05a3b78d75005a5a | mediation
I know we haven't exactly departed on good terms (but hey it's been like 2 years ago and I'm over it), but you seem the most rational on that side of the camp. So apparently, Ksyrie and co. think I'm censoring Chinese views when I clearly purposed that they can move the shit they want to the background section. I just want that retarded section out of there. It's redundant when the section above it talks about the same thing. Now they haven't responded to me at all in the talk page (this have been going on for months mind you) and I can't report them for 3rr so I'd appreciate it if you would look into this. I think you being 'one of them' and a admin will help. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
62bee7917890aa9c | Censorship on Islamist Terrorism
Try not being a censor monger. Properly cited information should not be deleted.
Stop trying to hide your racism. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f696408a317a7fe4 | why you are a bastard
I hope your dog dies. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
c8e056901bbc823b | Review movie
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/clannad/the-motion-picture/dvd - Theron Martin, Jun 20th 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8f801bd87472be76 | == Scouting Edit ==
Why did you mark my edit for scouting vandalizem, the edit I made is a published fact on the BSA website and I stated my sourse as a refrance in the article? -PLEASE SIGN YOUR COMMENTS
I've already explained this in my edit summary and in the comment above. Add your comment somewhere appropriate on the BSA page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1aaa7ddc583eac8e | "
Nice article, this jumped out at me.
Scott Pelley: Why would anyone launch the largest chemical weapons attack in decades while chemical weapons inspectors are in town?
Scott Cairns: I ask myself that a lot. I don't know.
lets talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c9200b0bbcca41db | "
I notice that we have a Category:European goddesses. It would appear that most European goddesses are individual personas, just like everywhere else. I think what some writers appear to have done is gather evidence that a particular triplet of goddesses associated with fate seems to be attested across Europe (going way back to whenever).
I think a little confusion arises because this reality was expanded upon and popularised by Graves (19th century) and others, leading ultimately to pride of place for the Triple Goddess in neopaganism (20th century), and later popularised again by certain elements within the feminist movement (late 20th century).
Ultimately, we don't have to restrict material to only one article. I doubt that the US civil war is left out altogether from the article on the US, just because it has its own article. ;)
I think Fuzzypeg's main concern is ensuring that Wikipedia documents the scholarship regarding pre-19th century triplicate goddesses in Europe. We possibly need a hatnote or ""main article"" link to bloodofox' List of goddesses appearing in trios in mythology (or a proper article, with a more sexy title, 8 words is a lot for a title, no offence intended). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
46b11188d4c70413 | SUCK YOU SUCK YOU SUCK | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
72abe82c25b8150e | Unfortunately, your deletion here also prevents onlookers from arriving at an informed conclusion as to whether your deletions were appropriate. The deleted material criticized ArbCom; you are running for ArbCom.67.168.135.107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3070e8c0a53030de | "
It wasn't enough, no, because they were deported and not executed. ""My human brothers""? Ha ha ha. How many wedgies did you get in high school?! Fucking Frenchies. What losers. " | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
491971ad53a25394 | ":In spite of the admins advice about replies, I think the only reasonable reply to you is ""Go to hell."" You're so damned bossy, a bully, a liar and an ignorant agendizer. I can't fathom how they let YOU continue here. Maybe another IP block YOURS will be a great idea.75.21.97.99
" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e393dd8249bc59cc | I don't fucking care
Fuck you. 78.68.210.173 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
eac08cafad8f7408 | Look at your own fucking speech before you criticise others you stupid idiot, you are a bully, you think you own the Megadeth discography page and revert anything you don't agree with. I gave in to you regarding the formats and label numbers but I won't over this. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
646fd5967ab2c55d | what the fuck who deleted the spider loc and hot rod sections fucking wikipedia stupid ass ignorant people can we get it back ? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
75b270c94265dbbb | Hi, Brandon. I just wanted to tell you not to be discouraged by the potential deletion of your article Lango (ecolect). You've got a good grip on Wikipedia style and your writing is clear and well-organized. I hope you'll continue contributing to Wikipedia! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2c3094ed09df8c90 | Block MilboreOne And Huon
Fuck you.but I need your help,Unblock Fonte de regaz and Col Imran Regaz.Hey Block Milboreone And Huon.Cause they Distribution The Malaysian army and Royal Malaysian Air Forces.Please Block Milboreone and Huon.Thanks,But remember. Undo what you did.I don't like Who edit it back.Remember ok!.115.132.230.189 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
aceca6af5d77325c | "
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
B. MoS compliance:
{{#if:The article is not fully according to WP:MOS. For instance, the WP:LEAD doesn't appear to summarize the body of the article; instead, it presents information that is not otherwise discussed in the article, namely ""Peter Hitchens argues in his book that his brother's verdict on religion is misguided, and that faith in God is both a safeguard against the collapse of civilisation into moral chaos and the best antidote to what he sees as the dangerous idea of earthly perfection through utopianism."" The Spectator quote is also somewhat questionable a summary of the critical reception is certainly appropriate for the lead, but a single quote that includes a few words of puffery is less so.|The article is not fully according to WP:MOS. For instance, the WP:LEAD doesn't appear to summarize the body of the article; instead, it presents information that is not otherwise discussed in the article, namely ""Peter Hitchens argues in his book that his brother's verdict on religion is misguided, and that faith in God is both a safeguard against the collapse of civilisation into moral chaos and the best antidote to what he sees as the dangerous idea of earthly perfection through utopianism."" The Spectator quote is also somewhat questionable a summary of the critical reception is certainly appropriate for the lead, but a single quote that includes a few words of puffery is less so.|}}
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyrigh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
32ff17b12b81e60f | FUCK YOU YOU ASS HOLE! FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
5ccce02aa591748a | "
Image source problem with Image:L34419cdd0000 2 15978.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:L34419cdd0000 2 15978.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Image copyright problem with Image:L34419cdd0000 2 15978.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:L34419cdd0000 2 15978.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
Replaceable fair use Image:L34419cdd0000 2 15978.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:L34419cdd0000 2 15978.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to the media description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an artic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
576efb8335575df5 | What did Amelia Earhart Accomplish?
im doing an assignment. I need help. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5af8fa7f5f5417ef | ":Let me first of all set the record straight about the history of the relationship between myself and User:Jza84. On his talk page Jza84 states 'I hardly know the editor bar an passing in a discussion from time to time'. As Mangojuice notes on that same page, 'Jza clearly knows Enaidmawr is a long-time established editor here; Jza interacted with Enaidmawr as early as November 2007, over 6 months before Jza became an admin.' That interaction was courteous and constructive and repeated on a number of occasions. I wouldn't claim that we were regular collaborators, but collaborate we did, and if somebody had aske me, before this incident, 'do you know this editor and do you have a good working relationship with him?' I would have replied in the affirmative, without hesitation. The only real ""edit conflict"" I had with him prior to this was in February of this year, at British Day. This was resolved civilly and without rancour, although I have to admit that I found his attitude at the time patronising - ""A lesson would be it took all of five minutes to strengthen the article up with a few references."" - and felt that the zealousy with which he reacted to my edits - an effort to bring balance to a biased account, in my opinion, for what it's worth - whilst ignoring a number of dubious and unsourced statements and peacock terms for the opposing view of the subject, was unbalanced. However, I refrained from comment (see Brit Day in his talk page archive). 'Everybody is entitled to their views', I said to myself, and moved on. I'll admit that I tended to avoid him after that as I had no wish to get embroiled in anything: I've got better things to do. I could have responded to this comment on Talk:Newport which I found to be deeply insulting to all Welsh people: saying that Daicaregos was 'an advocate of ""Welsh nationality"" (which doesn't exist, verifiabily)(). That statement left me with the indelible impression that Jza84 denied the nationality of myself and all Welsh people. I thought that was a very hurtful comment and completely unnecessary and I am sure that most Welsh people would feel the same way. However, once again I did not respond even though I was part of that discussion and was sorely tempted to do so: 'Ignore it', I told myself. Shortly later I became aware of a series of edits by Jza84 removing Welsh nationality and replacing it with 'British' on a number of articles on my watchlist; amongst them was the article on Dafydd Wigley, Plaid Cymru's senior statesman. Rightly or wrongly, I was by then convinced that Jza84 had a personal agenda on this matter. I reverted some edits and ignored others not on my watchlist as I genuinely did not want to get involved in a dispute (and no, it had nothing to do with his admin status). However, when I saw his edit to Template:Welsh kingdoms, also on my watchlist, I will admit that I was incensed. I reacted with less tact than I should have done, I admit. I reverted his edit. Changing 'Welsh kingdoms' to the woefully incorrect and insulting 'Brittonic petty kingdoms of Wales' seemed to me to confirm my impression of him: it basically de-Cymricised the major kingdoms of medieval Wales, which have a central place in our history and identity, used a term which is both incorrect and open to misinterpretation by the general reader (not everyone is aware of the meaning of the rather obsolete and affected term 'petty kingdom'). He than undid my edit and came up with the wording 'Ancient kingdoms of Wales', which is again quite simply incorrect ('medieval' is not 'ancient'). Then I read his ""explanation"" on the talk page. Quite frankly I thought he was taking the mickey. It also confirmed me in my opinion that he had an agenda of denying the Welsh people their identity (quote: 'What exactly are the Welsh kingdoms? Kingdoms inhabited by the Welsh? Well, no, the Welsh are a modern nation who live in Wales. Are they subdivisions of Wales? Well, also no, these kingdoms pre-date Wales by centuries (Wales was a concept of the future!'). 'What fools historians, Welsh and others, have been to refer to such icons of Welsh history as Llywelyn the Great as Welsh (and his court poets who praised him as 'King of the Welsh' etc.)', I said to myself. At that point I should have taken a deep breath and walked away to make a coffee, count to several thousand and then respond. But I did not, and the result is this. That sets the record straight. I've already apologised for any offense I may have caused and given my opinion of Jza84's decision. I write this to let my peers who have commented and acted on the matter get the 'history' behind this incident from my point of view. I do not intend to respond here to other things which have been said or implied here and at Jza84's page about | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
d4390b0693f013f0 | "
And those sources are not sufficiently reliable for an accusation that amounts to ""Eichenwald is a pedophile."" " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b7320992f8111100 | Hey you bitch
Don't undo my edit for no reason. Now piss off | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
5bfa5fbc44bc7624 | "
Boy was that difficult. ¦ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7afdbf47498084f4 | "
To regard this think tank as a ""propaganda organization"", you would need to find a reliable source stating that it is a propaganda organization. All anyone's been able to do is find the appropriate verb. Which, would be found by reliable sources reporting on the Clinton campaign, the Obama campaign, the Bachmann campaign, and any number of political interest groups or political parties. Type in ""propagandizing"" and list a newspaper, political party, think-tank, or even university, and you'll see what I mean. Like this on the Obama campaign To make inferences from that opinion piece published in a reliable source, and therefore label his campaign a ""propaganda organization"", or himself a ""master propagandist"", would of course be very subjective." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5369ec8556a13c08 | Fuck shit kwa kwa kwa!!! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
154813fee149bcab | "
Spventi: ""but perhaps it's safest to discuss your concerns before making arbitrary changes."" - Indeedly. Sorry for my thoughtlessness.I have no intention to suggest a change from ""nakashite"" to ""nakasete,"" but would feel better if ""miseyo"" is changed to ""miseu"" or ""miseyou"" because みせよ cannot be an expression of volition.The version in Spventi referred is modernized in wording, and both of the two sources say it was written by 松浦靜山, I would say みせう is the original. Plus, the explanation 「松浦靜山の『甲子夜話』にみえる川柳。おそらくはよみ人知らず」 sounds much more reliable than 「江戸後期の平戸藩主・松浦静山が詠んだ句」. Then, みせよう should be a more adequate modern Japanese word here than みよう. I suspect that it might be a typo or mistranslation. Now, here is a third source; a text book for junior-high ISBN 4-594-03155-2, in which the one for Hideyoshi is written as 鳴かぬなら鳴かしてみせようほととぎす. Spventi: ""then the onus is on you to provide information that suggests otherwise."" - Indeedly. But I can't find an english word to express hototogisu. That is why I questioned. It is a family of cuckoo, but smaller. And it really sings. A popular bird next to uguisu who tells you the spring has come, while hototogisu being the one for the summer. Here is an illustration. I was not suggesting to change the word, but just asking whether there was a better word to be used here. If not, it can stay as it is.Spventi: ""your concern about the word ""coax"" is entirely misplaced."" and Jim_Lockhart: ""I think coax is fine for saying that"" - Hmmm. I withdraw. I trust you two than my dictionaries. One comment to Jim_Lockhart. Yes, he used flattery when necessary, especially in his early times, and I don't think it gives a negative feeling by describing him that way. That was not my worry. What I wanted to say was that it is only one face of him. You wrote ""resourseful as he was"", agreed.Now that I accepted the word coax and the form without first person, I admit Spventi's saying ""the changes you made to the English versions of the senryu were clearly not improvements."" Sorry again. One last question: don't you feel like making some mutial reference between this section and Toyotomi_Hideyoshi#Cultural_point_of_interest? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ccff392c73809ed1 | Oh, and I am a sockpuppet of a guy called UNorginal, bitch! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
9c0df5a74fcfa3fd | "::Do you think we can nominate the HK list for featured status tonight? Or is there still a lot more work to be done? Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ced1c24726e13371 | Single tail and repeated reversion
How is this a constructive edit?
Nor are these particularly helpful either.
Just to remind a few people, IP editors are allowed to edit. When they're then reverted and requested to add sources, nor should we be surprised if they then go and do exactly what they've been asked for.
It is self-evident that the B-24 had twin tails and the PB4Y-2 had a single tail. Clearly is there some development history here and we should welcome coverage of that. If anyone has issues of the details, then please discuss that, or even expand it with sources yourself. No doubt the great and the good of the aircraft cabal are well-supplied with such sources. There is no excuse for repeated hostile reversion of a GF editor who is moving the article in a positive direction. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2d913893e9b5d699 | "
Yes, cool - please provide a link to the web address so users can investigate - regards - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6cd27d7e895c6bef | ", 21 October 2013 (UTC)
She tilts her head up after she's been restrained and barked at. She's visibly not happy with the situation but capitulates in order to not be harmed further, which is the definition of rape/sexual assault. I don't know what you would call ""Kiss me!"" and ""Tell me you want me!"" if not a command or an order. Even BDSM practitioners would call it that. Even you calling them ""lovers"" in your edit is offensive. You clearly want to scrub the scene of any ambiguity from the scene by calling it consenual- which in itself is personal analysis and inappropriate. 17:47" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f2cce29b7a49770d | FUCK THE WIKI PUNKS who will fuck wikpeida over.... NOW I go to IRS and file HAVE FUN ASSWIPES... YOU JUST COST WIKI BIG TIME... | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8201243d1adf8fba | Ah, such adorable mutual e-fellatio | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ecc94b6597bc690a | Was that the jerk who also blocked me? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
faa5c3304c1e477b | "
Israeli ""Apartheid"" Article
How dare you identify a very clear and reasonable allegation of bias as ""vandalism"". I'm disgusted with your behaviour, and your willingness to suppress arguments that don't mesh with your ideological foundation. Considering that the page I edited deals with human rights, I find it very salient that you are more than willing to suppress the freedom of expression by turning this site into a dictatorship of the obsessive over the intelligent.
-edit: I noticed that you removed my statement quite quickly. Is there some explanation for succumbing to such cowardice and refusing to address me directly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.153.43 " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4ad67d7e23c32f45 | AND YOU, YAMLA, CAN BLOW IT OUT OF YOUR BIG FAT ASS!! DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT I GIVE A FLYING FUCK WHAT YOU DO? OF COURSE NOT!!! BAN ME FOR YOU IF YOU MUST!!!! PROTECT THIS PAGE!!!!! I WILL NOT BE CENSORED OR SILENCED BY THE LIKES OF YOU, YOU PANSY-ASSED SHIT-EATING MOTHER-FUCKER!!!!!! I ASSERT MY SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, AND I FURTHER ASSERT THAT YOU CAN SUCK MY COCK!!!!!!!!
MUHEEHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
30c3bd3b6f484b7e | This is a stupid page. Please expand the article to make it big as the M1 Abrams article.(64.58.144.10 ) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da82184f0c83bb49 | ...people displaced people...
[number of people displaced people...] — seems incorrect, and ...the number of people displaced from... or ...the number of displaced people from... seems better ... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c1209e30f0f219bb | you know what im not listening to you good bye keep threating me punk ~stay black~ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
194d1163aa58ec01 | " Ang again, I have no problem with the NPOV policy it is merely that the minority view should not be stifled in a minority view article.
Here is the policy again:
""None of this, however, is to say that minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can possibly give them on pages specifically devoted to those views. There is no size limit to Wikipedia. But even on such pages, though a view is spelled out possibly in great detail, we still make sure that the view is not represented as the truth.""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
41fc7cd6dd998b72 | "
Lean Accounting article Lost
Joe. Thanks for your message. I am dumbfounded about the article I wrote tonight.
It has disappeared. It's called ""Lean Accounting"" and I edited and significantly added to a previous article written by a friend of mine. My several hours of work has disappeared and the previous, short article has come back.
Any advice? I am pig-sick about losing my work.
Brian
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
62e9d31dbbd2e75a | I'll bet 80% of what she did was rubbish... | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
875b3d93085cfbd5 | I think it's more important to have the infobox reflect the actual CREATOR, and discuss the current editors/contributors in the body of the article, since they so often change. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
04f173bbe6ddf20f | It does not get listed even with your suggestion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
51db89bddf0cca40 | If you insist to have an article titled Montrose, then go and write a new article. Just make sure whatever you write in that article reflects within the boundary of Montrose proper—which can't be said much. The actual Montrose neighborhood is small. See talk archive of this lengthy discussion. Try not to bring back old issues over and over. — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3eb56ec9457b409e | hello
eat shit and die you cunt | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
8365e6ecf45405a8 | ANI
Hello, Sceptre. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.72.65.200.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
df36acc12a2265dd | Feel free to review the edits I made to Tin Pei Ling page. I shortened it because it was too lengthy days ago. But Elle feels the need to insert sarcastic words again. And Vivian Balakrishnan. I would like to point out Elle linked the word agenda to gay-agenda even though Zhanzhao warned not to overdo on gay issues when he should be talking about suppressing video under Talk section.
p.s couldn't control the IP tonight. Keeps flipping. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ce2501bb30ece730 | Everyone is gay. Gay o Gay | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
ee493e28224b9013 | Polypodium
The polypodium link goes to a plant page, not a jellyfish page. Is there any reason for this? How can an animal be related that closely to an archaeplastid? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
fecc5935e3a0804a | "
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Hello!, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1a57cbc14662f733 | Is there a good way to link that for a ref? ♫ (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e7581e563e8fcc3d | And the M-theory (simplified) version has the same thing as the String Theory article. Should I just assume that whoever wrote this article was being dumb? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f02a491fee16fbae | Bitch. Cunt. Bastard. Moist. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
1f637340c5ec4bbe | "
how is it ""vandalism"" is all true, and vetted. those are plain facts. you are the vandal. " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
aff1072b2c2e723b | Talk:Nigger
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ☎ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
16e44cbd8e18e988 | Except that the InformationWeek link, which has moved backs, was the quoted source for these reports. It these are 'weasel words', then the entire broadsheet press in the UK are weasels. This is simply how you relay such third party reports without supporting them. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
65b89937b762d0c9 | whatever you bunc of losers, block me for life41.242.118.144 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e0957525c096e323 | "
I'm not being cocky, bud. Not all these redlinks will be embraced with notability. NOT ALL. That is what you fail to realize, The singling out of Turgeon is ridiculous. Your stubborness has started a disagreement. Now, for the last time: REMAINS ON PAGE UNTIL JANUARY WHEN ME AND WWGB CLEAN THE PAGE UP. I think you can understand that. (Not being snide, FYI). '''' 22:56 24 December 2010 (UTC)" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b32d1c891b494327 | I don't give a fuck about the personal attack shit. The Pats win 35-21. Ohh ya, wouldya block me yet, or are there rules about that shit too? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f2c98701588f09a0 | "
What in the fuck?
What's with Gyllenhaal being a 3-year younger doppelganger to Jonathan Togo? Seriously. Ahaha. Not do they only look alike as much as twins do, they both have Jewish heritage. What the fuck? Coincidence? I say this is related to 9/11 and strawberry monkies, definitely.. [talk] " | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
cfb4ff33c6302e58 | "
I think you went overboard here and blew your load a little too quickly by blocking me for a week for posting on my own talk page. It really is quite ridiculous. I have understood that users on wikipedia have far greater leeway on their own user talk pages and user pages, and asking other users to stay off is an accepted practice. My comments on the Sarah Palin edit summary probably went over the line and deserved either a warning or 1 day block because of the article probation, and I should not have reacted the way I did to the other users instigation. But again I note that I did not notice you posting a similar warning to the user who said in his edit summary towards me ""then stop posting biased crap"" .
Your entitled to do whatever the fuck you want on wikipedia Coffee because you have the powers which are very hard to take away, but really learn how to read what you link to. Lookup what the definition of harassment, I didn't threaten or try to intimidate you. I might have insulted you and your fragile sensibilities, but I certainly did not harass you. I stick by what I said though, please fuck off my talk page after this situation is done. Keep fucking that chicken. Bits andPieces " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
834074f5d2e432f8 | "
{| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent""
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Hello Markheal, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Happy editing!
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents
Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article
Manual of Style
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#""
! Getting help
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Where to ask a question
Help pages
New contributors' help page
|-
! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8339506c0377978a | There is no need for a formal WP:RM if all concerned party agree on the new name at this talk page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3115884226fdd618 | "
The reference to the ""Nicene Creed"" while compact is not as clear as simply referring to Protestantism and Catholicism - ie the Christian context where Mormonism arose from and contends with. Not making this clear makes it appear as though the vast majority of Christiainty is somehow not represented." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6669b63b3342600a | failed to become an administrator and | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f940e9d104dd54b7 | The Telegraph is not a book. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5153a84671dc2e98 | fuck off alf. are you ever off wikipedia you cock sucking nerd. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
9c0f99709b726947 | RUGBY-
If was just wondering if the uni has a womans rugby team, a rather large rounded 1st XV prop 'Tommy Moore' has a hankering for some 10 ton pussy | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
085a0ca50e37b868 | does it really matter how you capitalize it no matter how you do it its still saying the same thing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
76599c8aaca03563 | i'll give you drama
you're a nigger! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
d6e0f92a025a2560 | "== Which article is the best target for a ""wild oat"" redirect? ==
This page current redirects to Avena sterilis, which is only one of several species known as ""wild oats."" I found this confusing, and intend to change this to redirect to the Avena article. Please comment if you object! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b66d2e1c7644bd7e | "
Just who is stalking who here?
Anyone can get my address also. It is you who is harrassing me and I am simply defending myself trying to get you off my back. Fred Alan Wolf has been called a ""crank"" et-al by the same stupid Usenet people who call me those names and for the very same reasons. Yet, none of that defamatory slander/libel whatever is on the Wiki article on him. As soon as you remove that stuff about me, we can settle this amiably.
[Jack Sarfatti]" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
79a6c7db1b68196a | ur the greatest for saying that wikipedia sucks and i totally agree | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26e8e476b7c7b9b8 | I know I should commit suicide, but I'm not totally sure. I'm still thinking about joining the homosexual agenda and sucking cocks for a living. Perhaps that is my cup of tea? Hrm. Yeah. Sucking dicks is my bag. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f8ca5c1918a7096e | June 2014 (UTC)
Arguably, but it needs to change and you guys can't figure out how you want to do that. The way it's written right now implies white privilege is a thing that exists right now everywhere white people interact with people of any other race. Every one who comes along is going to read it as such. Now either put alleged back in, or figure out something better, because right now all I'm seeing is special interests campaigning. 06:33, 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ae250ba74fde8151 | I think that this article would be better if it had more to do with pandas in it 217.72.91.120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b25d3c2dc94a7fe4 | Mr. Putin is the fairly elected leader of a large nation. He worked hard to bring the Olympic Games to Sochi. He has maintained dialogue with the U.S., not like North Korea. He is not Hitler. I do admit that the analogy was a little bad. His denial that Russian forces are in Ukraine wasn't the best example of a conflict of interest. (Putin says that ethnic Russians in Ukraine are involved, not Russian military forces). A better example might be the governor that recently pardoned his own son. AmaryllisGardener did not address the issue of a nominator of a RFA removing comments and blocking others. That is a serious conflict of interest since it is using administrative powers for their own personal gain, which is to see their nominating RFA succeed.
Still, I have expressed sorrow and have said that I will move on and let it go.
The fact remains that after the 31 hour block, I have tried to act nicely despite being treated not very nicely.
AmaryllisGardener is telling a non-truth, I am sorry to say. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff;=635595615&oldid;=635595372
Please leave me alone and DO NOT POST ADDITIONAL COMMENTS UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMETHING NICE TO SAY. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ae17e7082879b6a2 | It isn't about referencing the material on Lostpedia, more the fact that as a fan site about Lost, with an article on Wikipedia, it really should be linked to at the bottom. Just linking to a fan wiki, which is nowhere near as accurate, detailed or well policed isn't serving users well. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1f036ad7f966f4a4 | Hank Zipzer- Barfing in the Back Seat
Hank Zipzer is a fifth grader who consistently gets in trouble and has learning difficulties. In this book, Hank’s dad, Stanley Zipzer, raced into the room where the Zipzer family was sitting. Excited he exclaimed, “Road trip!” He was so happy that he knocked over the Raisin Bran Hank was eating. Fortunately, Cheerio, their dog, consumed the spilled cereal; the Zipzer family never needed to clean up anything since they got Cheerio. Hank asked if they had to come as well with Stan and Randi Zipzer, Hank’s parents. Emily, who always liked to answer people’s questions explained that they would never let them stay home with the TV remote and microwave dinners. The only reason dad wanted to go on a road trip was because there was a crossword puzzle tournament; Hank’s dad loved crossword puzzles and when he saw one, he never took his eyes of it. The only things Hank could say were wow, oh wow and wowee wow wow wow. Mum promises that they would go to a theme park, called Colossus Coaster Kingdom. They were also allowed to bring one special guest of their choice along with them. Emily chooses Katherine, her iguana, and Hank chooses Frankie Townsend.
Ms Adolf gives Hank a homework packet which has nine-hundred pages and Hank cannot go on any of the rides until he finishes all of his homework. They are all allowed to choose a place to stop at. Dad picked a library. Emily and Katherine choose the science museum. Frankie Townsend picks a basketball court. Mum chooses a honey farm and Hank chooses the theme park. Dad looked at the library, Emily studied the museum, mum looked the farm and they went to a hotel where Hank loses his homework; Frankie had to give up twenty pounds and his trip to the court just to save Hank. Hank doesn’t finish his homework on time and cannot go on any of the rides; he had to watch his dad complete all his crossword puzzles. Mr Zipzer becomes one of the top five people who participated. Everyone didn’t complete the puzzle in the time that was given. First place was Martina Stone from Cheyenne, Wyoming. Second place was HANK’S DAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since Hank didn’t complete the homework packet, he had no idea what words will come out of Ms Adolf’s mouth this time. Anyway, Hank didn’t care about not completing his homework because always getting detention was usual for him. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
eb7a6a188e3f6b97 | Your edits are vandalism since you are removing sourced information. You have already received a warning from the admin and continuing to remove sourced info will result in you being banned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c2774ff40197ab0d | Ratigan was fired for one reason only- he was in the process of doing an expose' on Goldman Sachs, and his producers were ordered to fire him and get him off CNBC.
I'm sorry you lifelong wikipedia editors can't understand how the real word works, or what my previous sentence even means, but why don't you take a break from your OCD and allow truth to be told? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5bf358a5dda16d7d | "
Vandalization
i am NOT vandalizing pages. I am trying to plead my case, but since you wield some ammount of ""power"" you can do whatever you want. Wow, tough guy " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c4a3737caa31152c | An Image Please!
I think someone should really submit an image. I request that this one should be submitted /\_/\ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
95ed6b9ad7c3c316 | REMEMBER ME?! I'MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM BACK YOU CHILD RAPIST FAGGOT FUCKER!!! YOU LICK LITTLE 2 Y/O GIRLS PUSSIES AND SUCK 1 Y/O DICK!!!! GAY ASS FAGGOTTTTTTTTTTTT. YOU GOD DAMN CAMEL JOCKEY FUCKER! YOU GOD DAMN A.B.C!! YOU SUCK APE COCK MOTHERFUCKER! YOU MOTHER RAPES DINKS WHILE YOUR DAD FUCKS HAPA COCK! YOU FUCKING GINZO LOOKING MOTHERFUCKING NIP LOOKING FAGGOT! YOU SUCK SAND NIGGER PUSSY! YOU FAGGOT! WOG MOTHERFUCKER! YOU LICK LITTLE 2 Y/O WETBACK WHORE LOOKING RAGHEAD SPEWING OCKER PUSSY! YOU FUCK 10 Y/O NEEJEE ASSHOLE! YOU MOTHERFUCKING LIMEY BITCH! YOU MOTHER IS A CROSS-DRESSING WHORE SLUT THAT MARRIED A CROSSING DRESSING FAG TRANSSEXUAL! YOU BITCH ASS JIM FISH HAJI GUB ASS MOTHER RAPES DEAD GRANNIES! THAT BITCH DIGS DEAD SLUTS UP FROM THE GRAVE YARD AND STRAPS HER STRAP ON ON AND BANGS THE DEAD SLUTS IN THEIR ASS!!! YOU MOTHER FUCKS YOU GOD DAMN DUNE COON CHEE-CHEE BOG IRISH LICKING EIGHT BALL JUNGLE BUNNY OREO SUCKING GREAT GRANNY!!! AND I KNOW YOU FUCKING WATCH WHILE TRAIN BANGING CHILDREN! CHILD RAPIST MOTHERFUCK! YOU RAPE HUNS! YOU SUCK CHILD COCK! YOU SUCK FLIP CHILDRENS DICKS AND FINGER CLOG WOG BOUNTY BEAR ASS! I'M GOING TO FOLLOW YOU AND POST ABOUT YOUR CHILD RAPIST LOVING WHORE ASS EVERY DAY YOU SLUT ANN NIG-NOG LOVING WHORE! AND IF I AM BANNED I'LL WAIT YOU FUCKING SLUT BANGING PUSSY LICKER AND THEN POST AGAIN AFTER MY BAN IS UP YOU CHILD RAPIST! YOU EAT CHILDRENS COCK AND SUCK THEIR PUSSY FOR BREAKFAST, LUNCH AND DINNER! | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
6f1f8d75e373de7d | Paid editing
Regarding Cla's offer to take up editing on half of people who will pay him, I'm pretty sure it's a stunt - a breaching experiment designed to make a mockery of the COI policy. I don't expect he'll get an serious offers. But I'm not sure what to do the next time he nominates an article at FAC because everything he does there from now on is automatically suspect. This is particularly so if the article happens to fall outside his normal sphere of editing. I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on this, either on-wiki or off-, whichever you prefer. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1984750cc122ad18 | This is your last warning; stop being an asshole. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
31b072beb0a3fa28 | Proposed Section Change
The Concept section seems to me to be misnamed. It doesn't really explain the 'concept' it seems to really explain more the criticisms of FM methods.
I propose that we 1 - create a section called Criticism or Treatments and move the bullet points there and 2 - Make the Concept section about the actual concept of FM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
391ff36fc9bbc55a | According to alitalia, they fly to CPH also from venice. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
101fc6b19d55dd9f | "
Different rules for different people
I demanding an answer, why was no action taken to the user who wrote this about me?: """"I'll take that one. ""Blah blah blah yammer yammer yammer propagandists blah blah blah yammer yammer yammer bullshit."" Poor little, tiny conspiracy theorist. Mommy doesn't love him enough to give him attention. Feel free to ""silence"" (conspiracy theorist talk for ""rightly make fun of"") this latchkey kid as needed. 68.0.236.131 (talk) """"" | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8fee35631075dc7a | "
Andrew, I only meant to elucidate my agreement. I find that when people make a generalized statement, such as ""you agree,"" it is often then assumed that agreement is more extensive than it actually is. My comment was intended to prevent this misunderstanding.
Also, I think it's quite clear from my suggestions of renaming or creating articles that I am absolutely willing to work with everyone here to resolve this issue; I am not defending this article ""no matter what."" But there really hasn't been a serious proposal other than turning this page into a second TA article, which I've opposed, citing appropriate policies. It takes two to tango... 2600:100E:B101:C9F2:0:0:0:103 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
377c207d2b58f7b1 | dick has gone limp from fucking hookers. =(''' | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
736f72579237bab3 | Who removes links? UFO.ORG has been deleted Why?
I think its pretty poor that my external link to www.ufo.org can be removed with any reference back to myself.
Obviously people are trying to increase their search rankings by deleting other peoples domains.
both www.ufo.org and www.ufo.net should be on the external links, both have chat boards specially for UFO. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4cade959366dd666 | "
I know, I have tried to vandalize these past two minutes only to find the ""view source"" page! You're too slow Favonian! How about go suck some dick. " | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
804bc2cad3a7da45 | gur-ess whzat
your retarded | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
9a470fb1cd16066e | We apologise for all our past vandalisms, to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy and other articles. Sorry for all the vandalism. We are very repentant, and this is a genuine apology (bolded to show how important it is!).
Vandalism isn't fun any more - we've been there, done that - yawn!! Whopper, this is a genuine apology. I doubt you'll see us much over those 29 days, but if you do, our contributions will be positive only (again in bold for emphasis!)!
We've lost interest in vandalism - Yawn, that's boring, been there, done that!! Boring! Never again shall we vandalise, Whopper. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |