Datasets:

Arsive

/

toxicity_classification_jigsaw

like 2

58a670ad0c07b85a

ScJessey is a Big Fat Faggot Pinko Commie Asshole

fcd0dd37eb7ece02

tom harrisons a g@y bitch UR A FUCKING GAY FOO BIOTCH SO GO BACK TO THE CORNER AND START FINGERING URSELF AGAIN YOU STUPID BIOTCH

547e75817dfc1dd4

" And why is ""screw you, motherfucker"" a personal attack? I'm not implying anything about 80.174.59.92, am I? 76.210.66.152 "

e2f4d0ab13b6d71e

Race Hey. I'm writing from Imperial College, UK. The talk page is locked. Now the article is locked. Is that how you people collaborate? You ever had a kick in the ass? We can trace you! See you later!

6c75dd03b3efe945

" Talkback | talk to me WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter {| class=""navbox collapsible collapsed"" style=""width:100%; text-align: left; border: #039 2px; margin-top: 0.2em; background-color: #FFFFFF;"" |- ! style=""background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 2px #039 solid; text-align: center;"" |The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter |- | style=""border: 2px #039 solid;""| {| class=""plainlinks"" | colspan=""2"" valign=""middle"" style=""width: 50%; border: 2px #039b solid; background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 1em;"" | The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter Issue LXIII - February 28, 2010 Issue LXII | Issue LXIV |- | valign=""top"" style=""border: 2px #039 solid; padding: 1em; width: 48%; background-color:#FFFFFF;"" | Project in Review As of February 2010: Changes to Featured and Good Content Promoted Featured articles: None Promoted Featured lists: List of TNA Women's Knockout Champions Promoted Featured topics: None Reassessed Featured content: None Promoted Good articles: Nick Nemeth {{small|[[Talk:Nick Nemeth/GA1|(review p

8d7c7f19c82528ac

Hey UW Dawgs Dude, why did you delete my comment about the oregon ducks beating the Washington Huskies? The Huskies suck, and get crushed by the ducks every year. You should be absolutely ashamed of deleting that. Oh well, I guess it's just another butthurt huskies fan. Your team is bad and you should feel bad. Keep calm and keep on sucking huskies.

a1a106eb6bc3340f

im getting mad You had best stop harrasing me. You know that that stupid information isnt needed on that or wanted so stop waisting my time.

1586dfc65a859a3b

This is what happens to anti-Semites like you.

40946f9de4c1b781

I'm said to be crazy but im not. That make me vary ecstatic.heres my story see if you Know me.

c9b98aeb249a1b2e

Congratulations! Congrats on your election as Coordinator of the Military history Project! In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars.

b9b420323dc052de

REDIRECT Talk:List of Prime Ministers of the Kingdom of Sardinia

5bb88b2d9e3d12bc

" Do U Know Who Wrote All That ""Monkey"" Stuff This Morning (October 22 2005) and tottally ruined this page. That Is Such A Big Shame for Whoever Wrote All That Junk. William Burch"

14658942f6e3036a

ya EXTRA Ur fuckin EXTRA tryna bryte up urself and delete and revert my edits what if i revert ur face cuz it seems like u need some revertin on that ugly shit bitch. Zoe stay away from my edits u little hoe. Thank you for your consideration!

9268ec7201cfcdb7

" Yes! Thank you Salix Alba! This is what I mean. Enough of these calling me ""THE PIG MAN"" McGeddon! Just because Michael Barrymore has not taken any legal action against the mirror does not mean that the article is libellious. I propose that the statement that Barrymore did the e-pill forcing and made other trouble in the gay club is a dubious one. However it does have a citation so we can't say . I learn. "

089a470b1483e336

Your mama advertises her fat ass. 05:34, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

566866f701d5ae95

WHOEVER THIS IS FUCK OFF

e5bac299882d56c5

" . BLACKEST BACK MAN . "

4b45fb6f173bb173

FUCK YOU Ckatz you are german Cock sucker and FUCKER MOTHER FUCKER

ecb6184cd9faee4e

Dreadstar, LittleMountain5, and some jerk on the Internet are retarded assholes. Dreadstar is a pathetic nerdy little fuck with no prospects for ever meeting a woman he didn't pay for. LittleMountain5 doesn't have to worry about it because he's a flaming fag with an insatiable lust for semen. Some jerk on the Internet is just a sorry piece of shit in general.

5e28178553334686

Because Wikipedia is a bitch website that makes dumb decisions to let people like me join in their Intelligent Information, in which im going to ruin for you because your a GIANT PRICKKKKK I HATE INFORMATION BECAUSE IT MAKE ME BRAIN HURT !>! RAWR

a61b5d85d9e73f2d

Lists, BLP and stuff I have no intention of appearing in the debate but you might look at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Stand-alone_lists#Citing_sources which states Stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines for articles, including verifiability and citing sources. This means statements should be sourced where they appear, they must provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. HTH

d6f7353e4acbd822

Oh, here's a note: I HATE YOU! Ringo casts Sine! Ekoro casts Imitation! A critical hit! Satan casts Ascension! A critical hit! Pikachu used Thunderbolt! Vic Viper used Thunderbeam! 96.229.35.133 fainted! 99.162.57.13

66c3bced1735cb90

AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIRI AM GOING TO RAPE YOU IN THE ASS YOU FAT BITCH IN A WHEELCHAIR

1c228ef5a72cd117

I'm a bit concerned that might be orginal research. (Talk/Contrib)

9f846cf0f2aaa479

Wikipedia:WikiProject Iraq I hope that the approval of the page above meets with your approval.

2b4077833a3730bf

"""Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to List of WWE Intercontinental Champions."" What a fucking hypocrite. The fact that you left me a message telling me what a fucking douchebag I am just goes to show what a massive tool you are. Just for your information, that 100 day rule was something I started 2 years ago. "

908e7bc07f970c48

oi why did you give me a last warning, why do you have to be a cunt?

1707986a4af0b41d

That idiotic edit just got you the boot. Your bile and hate are not welcomed here.

ee93a7521a979aa9

, regardless of whether the writers even recognise it. (See theme )

74e8643075586e2c

Miners Day Thanks for deleting it fuck bag, nothing wrong with the article. Hope you get cancer and die you fucking limey.

fbbaea54bee793b5

" Help with CSS Reference Manual article Dear editor, this morning, I found a new article (CSS Reference Manual) initiated by another author (that I am not acquainted to). However, while the article was at that point (and this moment as well) clearly still 'work in progress', another editor/commenter had put an 'AfD' on it. Because I feel a strong need for this new article to exist, I defended it strongly with valid arguments, even stating that I wanted to contribute to it myself. However, at the point where on-topic discussions based on argumentation seized to exist, the editor/commenter started to attack me personally, by openly questioning my personal credibility. At his talk-page, an earlier ban (half way of the page) is present based on personal attacks (although I am not fully sure that he was the one given the ban or that he was the one that gave the ban to someone else). Nevertheless: because of this AfD, the article gets flamed now by other users that don't take a closer look at it, for no valid reason, just because it's currently labeled as 'AfD'... My question is therefore: could you help me out to let this article be enhanced properly to Wikipedia standards? Because I strongly feel that there is a need for it, it deserves a decent chance, because I would not liketo see very hard work thrown down the drain because of ""a bully"" that was banned before for personal attacks, and because the article's initial author (again: not me) has done a good job in starting it."

9cb014489eaf6b5b

Discussing The Existence of “repulsion particle” And Its Significance Discussing The Existence of “repulsion particle” And Its Significance Zhuang Yiliong Shanghai Institute of Science and Technology Management Abstract:This report has advanced a assume about the existence of “repellention” by a kind of new idea. Beginning with this, I have explained more successfully some import theory questions in the area of the present physics, cosmology and philosophy ect. At same time a few of new reasons have been raised But this is only rough idea of physical philosophy. many key details need to be answered by the improving science in the future. Key words: repulsion particle, the velocity of light, red shift, cosmos background. 　　　While the researched object of physics are increasingly getting its limit observed through the instrument, the function in the research of academic ideas are more important. In this article, only assumes the existence of a new particle, so it seems possible for many difficulty of physics and cosmology to be resulted. Maybe the key to unlock the door of advancing access of physics lies not in the building of physics, but in the palace of philosophy. One、Grounds of advancing the existence of “repulsion particle” Philosophic puzzles: gravity and repulsion, this is a pair of antiquated contradiction, theory of physics is a philosophic lame. Angels said that the true theory of matter should give the equal status to gravity and repulsion, the theory of matter only based on gravity is wrong, insufficiency and unilateral. Newton needed to find the first driving force for his physics, or else the world can’t act . There is contradiction between Newton’s law of universal gravitation and Einstein’s mass-velocity expression. In the law universal gravitation, the magnitude of gravitation is direct proportional to mass of the matter, the bigger the mass is, the stronger the gravity is; while in the mass-velocity expression, with the speed of the matter increasing, the mass will add. If the “mass” of the two law is the same, then the speed of matter will increase, and the gravity will be stronger, the matter will be drawn too tighten to move by the gravity. But in fact, it’s just opposition, the shotted cannonball is incline to break loose the gravitation, provided that the speed is high enough, it is able to fly off the orbit of the earth, even the solar system. This shows that the mass of adding with the speed increasing is different with that works on the gravitation, because it manifest obviously a kind of repulsion confronting the gravitation. So that, the two characteristics (speed increases, gravitation reduces; speed reduces, gravitation increases.) out while the state of moving matter changes .it is right to reflect the invert process between gravity and repulsion inside the moving matter , and indicate the existence of difference idiocratic mass. Newton believed: falling of an apple is because of the function of gravitation, then, we can question in the opposition, how can the apple get to the top of the tree? If we block out all of the complicated growing process of all tree with black-box theory, and only consider the beginning and the ending state, then, in the opinion of physics, there must be a kind of universal repulsion fighting back the gravitation working on the apple and pushing it to the high place. Therefor, the universal repulsion should exist everywhere, as well as the universal gravitation. What is the essence of “force”? This question has been disputing for hundreds of years, and it’s still not clear today. Newton said that it is the measurement of the acceleration of moving matter. But this only describes the force, not explains the essential mechanism. So, in Newton mechanics, the mass of the moving matter is unchangeable. Einstein brought out the character that the mass of matter is changed with the speed. He thought the activity of matter is result from getting energy, while energy can agglomerate matter, and this character of this matter is the same as the original matter, so can be added, resulting that the mass of matter may trend to infinite with the speed increasing. If we can import a kind of repulsion to explain it, and give the energy a carrier of practicality, then, the relation of movement and the “force” will be more clear. The radiant energy is always multiple of some elementary unit, what on earth is the physical meaning of Plank quantum constants? If it can be seen as a material particle, and indicate the existence of repulsion particle? Ray radiation has the two character of wave and particle itself. As to E=h*v, Plank regarded the radiant energy as constant h multiply frequency v from the site of wave theory; if, from the point of particle theory, we can regard it as the h combination of v quantu

03195998159e6ac5

Good point by JonC , legally the name of the state was still U.K. of G.B. and I. , but the other point being made is as of a qoute from the declaration itself , this is causing some confusion at this stage . Maybe the direct qoute from the declaration used with citation clearly outlining the issue might be better , some editors might object to the long winded intro , its an odd bin alright .

35243af9766437b5

GAYWAD you are a huge homo

a3bc74f79340c64e

It breaks my heart that people will look at this worthless piece of trash known as Wikipedia and take it seriously when it avoids all of the HARD evidence pointing to an inside job, by the way mind controlled child, NIST was caught manipulating data to make their theory seem plausible. Buildings do not fall into their own foot print when fires can not melt through steel and neither can jet fuel. The fires did not even reach half of the building, but the whole thing fell into it's own footprint. Funny the only conspiracy theory here is perpetrated by the official story.

884f9b100be0d8c0

":::John Strange's own nutjob words: ""But in view of the lower limit for the existence of Caphtor/Keftiu I would hesitate to identify in with Crete, if there is nothing which definitely warrants such an identification."" Too bad for him that Cretan citynames following kftiw are carved in stone during Amenhotep III. There's nothing to debate because Keftiu is 'Crete' with _100%_ certainty. John Strange is an idiot. "

7507ec8cebad2ae5

" Narvin A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Narvin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Narvin. "

e1d275aa72bb0786

hannah montana has been the first president in the united states they say dat miley cyrus is only 16 (WRONG) she's not she 182 she still looks young because she had plastic surgery on but really folks dere is nothing more than miley cyrus love for her people and i say miley cyrus is 1 freaky skank! lol too much boobs are showing,anywayz please please belive dis message it is a approved by teachers all over there world.

b9299d1318e99380

Hope you feel better after typing that screenful of homophobic denialism ) Meanwhile, Tchaikovsky was gay. Get over it.

d8e815750bd61c83

Go fuck yourself Tbnotch I am on a public computer. Suck on it bitch face.

cf408c3bfe179b74

ive got to tell you that i dont know what you think of this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garolou but i think it needs to be deleted. it looks like junk. it looks like garbage.

fd8970c0e95378b3

hiding behind these bitches wikipedians who keep reverting

60c9651477bc2421

It looks good to me, but can you make the size smaller so that it is similar to other sizes of other userboxes. Other than that, it looks fine. Please tell me the final name of the userbox so I can put it on my page. Thanks again.

2e9081c9fa539b69

GUY THAT SLEEPS WITH HIS MOTHER

15c128b082776517

I'm too sexy for my shirt Too sexy for my shirt, so sexy it hurts.

23b95ba7cf5ca9e8

Tony Goldmark Hihi! Just wanted to point out that Owlfarm88 was, in fact, talking to the real Tony Goldmark. I've been speaking to him on twitter about the whole fiasco, and I also directed him to post it on Owlfarm's talk page after he mistakenly posted it to mine, as Mr. Goldmark was generally unfamiliar with Wikipedia's editing guidelines. Glad that I can finally go on and edit other pages without worrying about that troll! -

f4ede3e1d9f8307c

I guess that is all about your age. You are too old and cannot update the data you already have in your brain. How can one explain so huge desire to offend people? 94.244.129.207

dd0ee01a4488d212

I think the recent editing by all has been brilliant. If I see anything that could be improved I'll speak up here. I would like to see a Christian Theosophy section also. Multiple reliable sources reference it. I'd like to learn more about when the term started. You probably already know. I don't know yet. Thanks for your work (and Hgilbert and DonaldRichardSands's work, too.)

588dc710fe713a8d

Motherfucked you PORKI muslim, what changes have you made at 1971 main section was useless, the defeat of PORKI MUSLIMS AND 15,000 MOSLEM WOMEN BEING RAPED BY HINDU-SIKH soldiers IN RANCHI(INDIA) JAIL seems to have made you mad.

149e15ad2efded1a

u r sooooooooooooo gay

3253ee82fd2c348f

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Anal leakage. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

6a45603ac7bfb4ab

" Human rights section should be removed After reading through this section it should either be removed or renamed ""Why Chinese are dogs and Tibet deserves freedom"" section. Referenced or not it's a far cry from unbiased. I don't even see why a section like that is needed I have added some more references to the ‘human rights’ section. I have also removed a number of the “XYZ claims that…” phrases, because they (a) disrupt the flow/readability (b) are unnecessary; just click on the reference if you want to see who is making the claim. I am not too surprised that this new section is upsetting some editors. Nevertheless, I absolutely disagree with claims that the information presented is biased, false, or unverified. Regarding neutral POV, what about consensus POV? Information about human rights in Tibet falls into 2 categories; in one the sole source is the Chinese Government, and in the other side is every other source (including UN, HRW, Amnesty, RSF, etc, etc….). I would like to see the “neutrality disputed” tag removed from this section, can we please continue the discussion here to resolve specific concerns? Provide additional sources if you disagree with the information from existing sources. At best this section is a place for pro-Tibet to post links to anti-China websites and vice-versa. It really doesn't contribute to the article as a whole. I will say it again - if you disagree with the existing sources then add your own, otherwise quit whining. And surely you cannot be serious about removing the section. Human Rights in Tibet is a very serious issue, and this page is the right place to cover it. I'd agree entirely. However, some of the wording could probably made more neutral while preserving the facts. For instance: adding ""According to Human Rights Watch, a non-government organization, Tibetans are denied..."". (Which is done for several other sentences). It might also allay some concerns if sources could be found from a less-biased source. I'm not really disputing the accuracy of HRW or FreeTibet, but it's rather harder to argue that an article from the New York Times suffers from a bias. Just my $0.02. It is essential to state where the sources is retreated from in a particular statement. In a controversial section like this, its important to differentiate the origin of the source, because many links cited in this section came from a particular organization. The user who started this section grouped a bunch of statements (with various citings) together. Some of the statements are not supported by one reference but the other, we have to pick them out and make sure they fit the accurate reference. referenced or not its a far cry from unbiased. Please review WP:NPOV. Wikipedia must report viewpoints held by both Chinese and human rights organizations. A statement of fact cannot be biased, and ""X states Y"" is a statement of fact. I should add however, that which facts ought to be included is up for discussion under WP:UNDUE. However, since the vast majority of English press regarding Tibet deals with human rights issues, I don't think it can reasonably contested that a ""Human rights"" section ought to be part of this article. I am the one who started this section. I did it in good faith, and considered it to be an initial draft for further development. I tried to group the statements together into a logical sequence, and also tried to accurately link the statements to their supporting references. I appreciate the constructive edits done by other editors since then, and before I add any more references I will help to clean up the existing text so that it faithfully ties to the existing references. GimmeDanger is absolutely correct in saying that a statement of fact (ie. has evidence to support it) cannot be biased; it is a fact, end of story. However, what often happens on other Wiki pages is that the argument then moves to which references are considered reliable. This is the reason I have used a variety of different sour

d5dc6f772e995cf4

" Is that anything like saying, ""The hypothesis on Global Warming doesn't have any significant scientific support?"" I'm not saying it doesn't, but it's wrong for you to suggest that there's no scientific support against anthropogenic GW, the same as saying there was no scientific support for global cooling then. Perhaps the reason there is so much more support for GW than global cooling in the 70's is that information and studies are so much more available these days. Maybe the reason GW is such a big deal now is because places like MySpace and MTV make it so much more marketable. Personally, I see a lot of hype and not a lot of proof. "

19bfbad492f5cb7a

you want to know why most people hate pedophiles?I will tell you why! 1)all pedos are MEN.18-75 2)these are KIDS!!!I would not like some MAN F'n my 16yrold!nor my 12yrold!nor my 3yrold! 3)IT IS VERY SICK!VERY VERY SICK! i hope there are no pedos here! saikano

70538b5232d18bd1

U Suck why can i not edit i am not writing anything bad just changes words to their correct spelling.

707a542859bec6f5

Stop Stop kissing a** so much. Be your own man. DrJoe

21e5f9ca12ce8d31

Not without my lawyer. At quick glance, you seem like an investigator for Wikipedia, official, or self-appointed. I don't want no trouble, man. End of story.

b977b36ff0aba246

" KITTENS! I throw them against the wall. "

4f5411878cdaa8d0

REDIRECT Talk:San Pedro Yólox

9ad44a7973c58d23

Last warning? Oooooh, I'm really scared now! Oooooooooooh.