body_cleaned
stringlengths
28
4.28k
id
stringlengths
4
7
subreddit
stringclasses
3 values
year
int64
2.01k
2.02k
annotation1
stringlengths
28
4.33k
annotation2
stringlengths
28
4.34k
gold_annotation
stringlengths
28
4.34k
bio_annotation
sequencelengths
6
841
ids
sequencelengths
6
841
tokenized_body_cleaned
sequencelengths
6
841
no i am anti war , and think they you should get the hell out of the the middle east . just because i am anti rp , does n't mean i am for war reasons . his economic policies and outlook on how the market '' should run are borderline retarded .
c2nbkys
Libertarian
2,011
no i am anti war , and think they you should get the hell out of the the middle east . just because i am anti rp , does n't mean i am for war reasons . his economic policies and outlook on how the market '' should run are borderline retarded .
no i am anti war , and think they you should get the hell out of the the middle east . just because i am anti rp , does n't mean i am for war reasons . his economic policies and outlook on how the market '' should run are borderline retarded .
no i am anti war , and think they you should get the hell out of the the middle east . just because i am anti rp , does n't mean i am for war reasons . his economic policies and outlook on how the market '' should run are borderline retarded .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", "i", "am", "anti", "war", ",", "and", "think", "they", "you", "should", "get", "the", "hell", "out", "of", "the", "the", "middle", "east", ".", "just", "because", "i", "am", "anti", "rp", ",", "does", "n't", "mean", "i", "am", "for", "war", "reasons", ".", "his", "economic", "policies", "and", "outlook", "on", "how", "the", "market", "``", "should", "run", "are", "borderline", "retarded", "." ]
... you see this is where the somalia example is relevant .
c1m16z9
Libertarian
2,011
... you see this is where the somalia example is relevant .
... you see this is where the somalia example is relevant .
... you see this is where the somalia example is relevant .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "...", "you", "see", "this", "is", "where", "the", "somalia", "example", "is", "relevant", "." ]
and lincoln violated the document he used to justify his war .
c1waav7
Libertarian
2,011
and lincoln violated the document he used to justify his war .
and lincoln violated the document he used to justify his war .
and lincoln violated the document he used to justify his war .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "lincoln", "violated", "the", "document", "he", "used", "to", "justify", "his", "war", "." ]
it 's also implied not as directly that the publication of rorschach 's journal could be dismissed as tabloid bullshit . he sent it to a rightwing rag that he liked because he thought they published the truth . the new frontiersman is n't exactly the new york times when it comes to reaching an audience . the irony is that they would be publishing the truth but it could be dismissed easily given the nature of the publication and the crazy things they 've printed in the past . got ta give alan moore credit for writing a layered up onion of a story .
c2cnq34
Libertarian
2,011
it 's also implied not as directly that the publication of rorschach 's journal could be dismissed as tabloid bullshit . he sent it to a rightwing rag that he liked because he thought they published the truth . @@the new frontiersman## is n't exactly @@the new york times## when it comes to reaching an audience . the irony is that they would be publishing the truth but it could be dismissed easily given the nature of the publication and the crazy things they 've printed in the past . got ta give alan moore credit for writing a layered up onion of a story .
it 's also implied not as directly that the publication of rorschach 's journal could be dismissed as tabloid bullshit . he sent it to a rightwing rag that he liked because he thought they published the truth . the new frontiersman is n't exactly the new york times when it comes to reaching an audience . the irony is that they would be publishing the truth but it could be dismissed easily given the nature of the publication and the crazy things they 've printed in the past . got ta give alan moore credit for writing a layered up onion of a story .
it 's also implied not as directly that the publication of rorschach 's journal could be dismissed as tabloid bullshit . he sent it to a rightwing rag that he liked because he thought they published the truth . @@the new frontiersman## is n't exactly @@the new york times## when it comes to reaching an audience . the irony is that they would be publishing the truth but it could be dismissed easily given the nature of the publication and the crazy things they 've printed in the past . got ta give alan moore credit for writing a layered up onion of a story .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "'s", "also", "implied", "not", "as", "directly", "that", "the", "publication", "of", "rorschach", "'s", "journal", "could", "be", "dismissed", "as", "tabloid", "bullshit", ".", "he", "sent", "it", "to", "a", "rightwing", "rag", "that", "he", "liked", "because", "he", "thought", "they", "published", "the", "truth", ".", "the", "new", "frontiersman", "is", "n't", "exactly", "the", "new", "york", "times", "when", "it", "comes", "to", "reaching", "an", "audience", ".", "the", "irony", "is", "that", "they", "would", "be", "publishing", "the", "truth", "but", "it", "could", "be", "dismissed", "easily", "given", "the", "nature", "of", "the", "publication", "and", "the", "crazy", "things", "they", "'ve", "printed", "in", "the", "past", ".", "got", "ta", "give", "alan", "moore", "credit", "for", "writing", "a", "layered", "up", "onion", "of", "a", "story", "." ]
but the essentials get cheaper .
c1glpm2
Libertarian
2,011
but the essentials get cheaper .
but the essentials get cheaper .
but the essentials get cheaper .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "the", "essentials", "get", "cheaper", "." ]
i hope i have n't come off as too much of a dick , because this whole backandforth has made me think a lot more about this kind of thing . plus , i 've had to learn a couple of things to keep up i did n't know about the glasssteagal act , for example . the problem with the idea that the system can be fixed is that it implies that the system to be fixed is necessary . after all , there 's little point and sometimes great detriment to tinkering with something that is n't necessary , right ? you feel that because businesses are run by people who are fallible , and are primarily focused on making money , they ca n't be trusted to act fairly or ethically . so your proposed solution is the imposition of a system of laws to force them to play nice , to give them strong negative incentives against ripping people off , swindling investors , or strongarming competition . the problem is that such a system shifts the burden of ethical behavior from business to regulator . now instead of needing to be able to trust the entire business edifice of oracle , we need to be able to trust , top to bottom , the entire federal edifice designed and built to keep oracle honest '' , in whatever context we 're using the term . you 've introduced the possibility of regulatory capture , as you pointed out , and the possibility that the regulators just wo n't notice , or wo n't act in time to stave off some kind of shady deal as was the case in the whole bernie madoff boondoggle . you 've added a second order of fallibility , and , even worse , one largely protected by the federal government itself since it 's an arm of the government , after all . i do n't have a perfect solution for the kind of thing regulations are supposed to fix . i seriously doubt that there is a perfect solution . but we 've been regulating , in one way or another , for more than 50 years , and it always seems like the next regulation '' will be the one that fixes everything .
c2nfeaj
Libertarian
2,011
i hope i have n't come off as too much of a dick , because this whole backandforth has made me think a lot more about this kind of thing . plus , i 've had to learn a couple of things to keep up i did n't know about the glasssteagal act , for example . the problem with the idea that the system can be fixed is that it implies that the system to be fixed is necessary . after all , there 's little point and sometimes great detriment to tinkering with something that is n't necessary , right ? you feel that because businesses are run by @@people who are fallible , and are primarily focused on making money## , they ca n't be trusted to act fairly or ethically . so your proposed solution is the imposition of a system of laws to force them to play nice , to give them strong negative incentives against ripping people off , swindling @@investors## , or strongarming competition . the problem is that such a system shifts the burden of ethical behavior from business to regulator . now instead of needing to be able to trust the entire business edifice of oracle , we need to be able to trust , top to bottom , the entire federal edifice designed and built to keep oracle honest '' , in whatever context we 're using the term . you 've introduced the possibility of regulatory capture , as you pointed out , and the possibility that the @@regulators## just wo n't notice , or wo n't act in time to stave off some kind of shady deal as was the case in the whole bernie madoff boondoggle . you 've added a second order of fallibility , and , even worse , one largely protected by the @@federal government## itself since it 's an arm of the government , after all . i do n't have a perfect solution for the kind of thing regulations are supposed to fix . i seriously doubt that there is a perfect solution . but we 've been regulating , in one way or another , for more than 50 years , and it always seems like the next regulation '' will be the one that fixes everything .
i hope i have n't come off as too much of a dick , because this whole backandforth has made me think a lot more about this kind of thing . plus , i 've had to learn a couple of things to keep up i did n't know about the glasssteagal act , for example . the problem with the idea that the system can be fixed is that it implies that the system to be fixed is necessary . after all , there 's little point and sometimes great detriment to tinkering with something that is n't necessary , right ? you feel that because businesses are run by @@people who are fallible## , and are primarily focused on making money , they ca n't be trusted to act fairly or ethically . so your proposed solution is the imposition of a system of laws to force them to play nice , to give them strong negative incentives against ripping people off , swindling @@investors## , or strongarming competition . the problem is that such a system shifts the burden of ethical behavior from business to regulator . now instead of needing to be able to trust the entire business edifice of oracle , we need to be able to trust , top to bottom , the entire federal edifice designed and built to keep oracle honest '' , in whatever context we 're using the term . you 've introduced the possibility of regulatory capture , as you pointed out , and the possibility that the @@regulators## just wo n't notice , or wo n't act in time to stave off some kind of shady deal as was the case in the whole bernie madoff boondoggle . you 've added a second order of fallibility , and , even worse , one largely protected by the @@federal government## itself since it 's an arm of the government , after all . i do n't have a perfect solution for the kind of thing regulations are supposed to fix . i seriously doubt that there is a perfect solution . but we 've been regulating , in one way or another , for more than 50 years , and it always seems like the next regulation '' will be the one that fixes everything .
i hope i have n't come off as too much of a dick , because this whole backandforth has made me think a lot more about this kind of thing . plus , i 've had to learn a couple of things to keep up i did n't know about the glasssteagal act , for example . the problem with the idea that the system can be fixed is that it implies that the system to be fixed is necessary . after all , there 's little point and sometimes great detriment to tinkering with something that is n't necessary , right ? you feel that because businesses are run by @@people who are fallible , and are primarily focused on making money## , they ca n't be trusted to act fairly or ethically . so your proposed solution is the imposition of a system of laws to force them to play nice , to give them strong negative incentives against ripping people off , swindling @@investors## , or strongarming competition . the problem is that such a system shifts the burden of ethical behavior from business to regulator . now instead of needing to be able to trust the entire business edifice of oracle , we need to be able to trust , top to bottom , the entire federal edifice designed and built to keep oracle honest '' , in whatever context we 're using the term . you 've introduced the possibility of regulatory capture , as you pointed out , and the possibility that the @@regulators## just wo n't notice , or wo n't act in time to stave off some kind of shady deal as was the case in the whole bernie madoff boondoggle . you 've added a second order of fallibility , and , even worse , one largely protected by the @@federal government## itself since it 's an arm of the government , after all . i do n't have a perfect solution for the kind of thing regulations are supposed to fix . i seriously doubt that there is a perfect solution . but we 've been regulating , in one way or another , for more than 50 years , and it always seems like the next regulation '' will be the one that fixes everything .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "hope", "i", "have", "n't", "come", "off", "as", "too", "much", "of", "a", "dick", ",", "because", "this", "whole", "backandforth", "has", "made", "me", "think", "a", "lot", "more", "about", "this", "kind", "of", "thing", ".", "plus", ",", "i", "'ve", "had", "to", "learn", "a", "couple", "of", "things", "to", "keep", "up", "i", "did", "n't", "know", "about", "the", "glasssteagal", "act", ",", "for", "example", ".", "the", "problem", "with", "the", "idea", "that", "the", "system", "can", "be", "fixed", "is", "that", "it", "implies", "that", "the", "system", "to", "be", "fixed", "is", "necessary", ".", "after", "all", ",", "there", "'s", "little", "point", "and", "sometimes", "great", "detriment", "to", "tinkering", "with", "something", "that", "is", "n't", "necessary", ",", "right", "?", "you", "feel", "that", "because", "businesses", "are", "run", "by", "people", "who", "are", "fallible", ",", "and", "are", "primarily", "focused", "on", "making", "money", ",", "they", "ca", "n't", "be", "trusted", "to", "act", "fairly", "or", "ethically", ".", "so", "your", "proposed", "solution", "is", "the", "imposition", "of", "a", "system", "of", "laws", "to", "force", "them", "to", "play", "nice", ",", "to", "give", "them", "strong", "negative", "incentives", "against", "ripping", "people", "off", ",", "swindling", "investors", ",", "or", "strongarming", "competition", ".", "the", "problem", "is", "that", "such", "a", "system", "shifts", "the", "burden", "of", "ethical", "behavior", "from", "business", "to", "regulator", ".", "now", "instead", "of", "needing", "to", "be", "able", "to", "trust", "the", "entire", "business", "edifice", "of", "oracle", ",", "we", "need", "to", "be", "able", "to", "trust", ",", "top", "to", "bottom", ",", "the", "entire", "federal", "edifice", "designed", "and", "built", "to", "keep", "oracle", "honest", "``", ",", "in", "whatever", "context", "we", "'re", "using", "the", "term", ".", "you", "'ve", "introduced", "the", "possibility", "of", "regulatory", "capture", ",", "as", "you", "pointed", "out", ",", "and", "the", "possibility", "that", "the", "regulators", "just", "wo", "n't", "notice", ",", "or", "wo", "n't", "act", "in", "time", "to", "stave", "off", "some", "kind", "of", "shady", "deal", "as", "was", "the", "case", "in", "the", "whole", "bernie", "madoff", "boondoggle", ".", "you", "'ve", "added", "a", "second", "order", "of", "fallibility", ",", "and", ",", "even", "worse", ",", "one", "largely", "protected", "by", "the", "federal", "government", "itself", "since", "it", "'s", "an", "arm", "of", "the", "government", ",", "after", "all", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "have", "a", "perfect", "solution", "for", "the", "kind", "of", "thing", "regulations", "are", "supposed", "to", "fix", ".", "i", "seriously", "doubt", "that", "there", "is", "a", "perfect", "solution", ".", "but", "we", "'ve", "been", "regulating", ",", "in", "one", "way", "or", "another", ",", "for", "more", "than", "50", "years", ",", "and", "it", "always", "seems", "like", "the", "next", "regulation", "``", "will", "be", "the", "one", "that", "fixes", "everything", "." ]
i think that needs to be step one before worrying about the insurance issue . getting everyone insured does no good when the overall cost of healthcare continues to spiral out of control .
c3c8ea2
Libertarian
2,011
i think that needs to be step one before worrying about the insurance issue . getting everyone insured does no good when the overall cost of healthcare continues to spiral out of control .
i think that needs to be step one before worrying about the insurance issue . getting everyone insured does no good when the overall cost of healthcare continues to spiral out of control .
i think that needs to be step one before worrying about the insurance issue . getting everyone insured does no good when the overall cost of healthcare continues to spiral out of control .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "think", "that", "needs", "to", "be", "step", "one", "before", "worrying", "about", "the", "insurance", "issue", ".", "getting", "everyone", "insured", "does", "no", "good", "when", "the", "overall", "cost", "of", "healthcare", "continues", "to", "spiral", "out", "of", "control", "." ]
the sad thing is how many of the people advocating the occupy wall street '' movement will still vote for a candidate that supported tarp .
c2rx93g
Libertarian
2,011
the sad thing is how many of the @@people advocating the occupy wall street '' movement## will still vote for a candidate that supported tarp .
the sad thing is how many of the @@people advocating the occupy wall street '' movement## will still vote for a candidate that supported tarp .
the sad thing is how many of the @@people advocating the occupy wall street '' movement## will still vote for a candidate that supported tarp .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "sad", "thing", "is", "how", "many", "of", "the", "people", "advocating", "the", "occupy", "wall", "street", "``", "movement", "will", "still", "vote", "for", "a", "candidate", "that", "supported", "tarp", "." ]
it 's really quite simple from an ideologic standpoint . taxes are forced upon us by the government , do n't pay your taxes and you go to jail . even in a democratic society , not everyone agrees on what those taxes should be . majority rule '' simply is n't fair .
c32fx7r
Libertarian
2,011
it 's really quite simple from an ideologic standpoint . taxes are forced upon us by the government , do n't pay your taxes and you go to jail . even in a democratic society , not everyone agrees on what those taxes should be . majority rule '' simply is n't fair .
it 's really quite simple from an ideologic standpoint . taxes are forced upon us by the government , do n't pay your taxes and you go to jail . even in a democratic society , not everyone agrees on what those taxes should be . majority rule '' simply is n't fair .
it 's really quite simple from an ideologic standpoint . taxes are forced upon us by the government , do n't pay your taxes and you go to jail . even in a democratic society , not everyone agrees on what those taxes should be . majority rule '' simply is n't fair .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "'s", "really", "quite", "simple", "from", "an", "ideologic", "standpoint", ".", "taxes", "are", "forced", "upon", "us", "by", "the", "government", ",", "do", "n't", "pay", "your", "taxes", "and", "you", "go", "to", "jail", ".", "even", "in", "a", "democratic", "society", ",", "not", "everyone", "agrees", "on", "what", "those", "taxes", "should", "be", ".", "majority", "rule", "``", "simply", "is", "n't", "fair", "." ]
no , i doubt it . probably from the mid 80 's or so .
c1xsub9
Libertarian
2,011
no , i doubt it . probably from the mid 80 's or so .
no , i doubt it . probably from the mid 80 's or so .
no , i doubt it . probably from the mid 80 's or so .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "i", "doubt", "it", ".", "probably", "from", "the", "mid", "80", "'s", "or", "so", "." ]
to play devils advocate , it 's okay to go kill a bunch of people in one area just because most of them are criminals is what that quote says ?
c1tptjf
Libertarian
2,011
to play devils advocate , it 's okay to go kill a bunch of people in one area just because most of them are @@criminals## is what that quote says ?
to play devils advocate , it 's okay to go kill a bunch of @@people in one area## just because most of them are @@criminals## is what that quote says ?
to play devils advocate , it 's okay to go kill a bunch of @@people in one area## just because most of them are @@criminals## is what that quote says ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "to", "play", "devils", "advocate", ",", "it", "'s", "okay", "to", "go", "kill", "a", "bunch", "of", "people", "in", "one", "area", "just", "because", "most", "of", "them", "are", "criminals", "is", "what", "that", "quote", "says", "?" ]
here 's the total domestic corn production for the past few years URL . does the change in supply warrant a 150 increase ?
c1wf2tb
Libertarian
2,011
here 's the total domestic corn production for the past few years URL . does the change in supply warrant a 150 increase ?
here 's the total domestic corn production for the past few years URL . does the change in supply warrant a 150 increase ?
here 's the total domestic corn production for the past few years URL . does the change in supply warrant a 150 increase ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "here", "'s", "the", "total", "domestic", "corn", "production", "for", "the", "past", "few", "years", "URL", ".", "does", "the", "change", "in", "supply", "warrant", "a", "150", "increase", "?" ]
are you kidding ? you think that this war on terror '' has nothing to do with creating an economy of military contracts ? it has nothing to do with special interest ? do you really think these third world countries are just gon na fabricate a navy or airforce out of thin air and start attacking us ? you 're a damn fool . explain to me how our leaders '' avoided this complete financial meltdown . '' it was nothing more than a ploy to give the rich more money . keynesian economics does not work , it has never worked and it never will . i know it 's hard to convince someone as closedminded as you something like that but since you 're so set in your ways i do n't even know why i 'm bothering . the links you posted quoted paul , yes , then they distorted his message and put words in his mouth . they 're just as bad as prison planet and stormfront and so are you . there 's no ignorance from me , i 've done my research maybe it 's time you do yours . try reading the work of hayek , or read into some of the exhead of cia 's books and see some real data . you do n't have shit .
c2761u3
Libertarian
2,011
are you kidding ? you think that this war on terror '' has nothing to do with creating an economy of military contracts ? it has nothing to do with special interest ? do you really think these @@third world countries## are just gon na fabricate a navy or airforce out of thin air and start attacking us ? you 're a damn fool . explain to me how our @@leaders## '' avoided this complete financial meltdown . '' it was nothing more than a ploy to give @@the rich## more money . keynesian economics does not work , it has never worked and it never will . i know it 's hard to convince someone as closedminded as you something like that but since you 're so set in your ways i do n't even know why i 'm bothering . the links you posted quoted paul , yes , then they distorted his message and put words in his mouth . they 're just as bad as prison planet and stormfront and so are you . there 's no ignorance from me , i 've done my research maybe it 's time you do yours . try reading the work of hayek , or read into some of the exhead of cia 's books and see some real data . you do n't have shit .
are you kidding ? you think that this war on terror '' has nothing to do with creating an economy of military contracts ? it has nothing to do with special interest ? do you really think these @@third world countries## are just gon na fabricate a navy or airforce out of thin air and start attacking us ? you 're a damn fool . explain to me how our @@leaders## '' avoided this complete financial meltdown . '' it was nothing more than a ploy to give @@the rich## more money . keynesian economics does not work , it has never worked and it never will . i know it 's hard to convince someone as closedminded as you something like that but since you 're so set in your ways i do n't even know why i 'm bothering . the links you posted quoted paul , yes , then they distorted his message and put words in his mouth . they 're just as bad as prison planet and stormfront and so are you . there 's no ignorance from me , i 've done my research maybe it 's time you do yours . try reading the work of hayek , or read into some of the exhead of cia 's books and see some real data . you do n't have shit .
are you kidding ? you think that this war on terror '' has nothing to do with creating an economy of military contracts ? it has nothing to do with special interest ? do you really think these @@third world countries## are just gon na fabricate a navy or airforce out of thin air and start attacking us ? you 're a damn fool . explain to me how our @@leaders## '' avoided this complete financial meltdown . '' it was nothing more than a ploy to give @@the rich## more money . keynesian economics does not work , it has never worked and it never will . i know it 's hard to convince someone as closedminded as you something like that but since you 're so set in your ways i do n't even know why i 'm bothering . the links you posted quoted paul , yes , then they distorted his message and put words in his mouth . they 're just as bad as prison planet and stormfront and so are you . there 's no ignorance from me , i 've done my research maybe it 's time you do yours . try reading the work of hayek , or read into some of the exhead of cia 's books and see some real data . you do n't have shit .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "are", "you", "kidding", "?", "you", "think", "that", "this", "war", "on", "terror", "``", "has", "nothing", "to", "do", "with", "creating", "an", "economy", "of", "military", "contracts", "?", "it", "has", "nothing", "to", "do", "with", "special", "interest", "?", "do", "you", "really", "think", "these", "third", "world", "countries", "are", "just", "gon", "na", "fabricate", "a", "navy", "or", "airforce", "out", "of", "thin", "air", "and", "start", "attacking", "us", "?", "you", "'re", "a", "damn", "fool", ".", "explain", "to", "me", "how", "our", "leaders", "``", "avoided", "this", "complete", "financial", "meltdown", ".", "``", "it", "was", "nothing", "more", "than", "a", "ploy", "to", "give", "the", "rich", "more", "money", ".", "keynesian", "economics", "does", "not", "work", ",", "it", "has", "never", "worked", "and", "it", "never", "will", ".", "i", "know", "it", "'s", "hard", "to", "convince", "someone", "as", "closedminded", "as", "you", "something", "like", "that", "but", "since", "you", "'re", "so", "set", "in", "your", "ways", "i", "do", "n't", "even", "know", "why", "i", "'m", "bothering", ".", "the", "links", "you", "posted", "quoted", "paul", ",", "yes", ",", "then", "they", "distorted", "his", "message", "and", "put", "words", "in", "his", "mouth", ".", "they", "'re", "just", "as", "bad", "as", "prison", "planet", "and", "stormfront", "and", "so", "are", "you", ".", "there", "'s", "no", "ignorance", "from", "me", ",", "i", "'ve", "done", "my", "research", "maybe", "it", "'s", "time", "you", "do", "yours", ".", "try", "reading", "the", "work", "of", "hayek", ",", "or", "read", "into", "some", "of", "the", "exhead", "of", "cia", "'s", "books", "and", "see", "some", "real", "data", ".", "you", "do", "n't", "have", "shit", "." ]
in what sense can the federal government endorse liberty that it did not in times of greater statelevel oppression ? the federal government was pretty hands off in the 19th century , but liberty was in a horrible state . all of the lobbyists are trying their last ditch effort to get their views recognized as the '' view . when the '' view no longer exists where will they turn to get their agenda pushed ? some states will be affected worse than others , but peer pressure will ultimately win . ultimately is n't good enough . i 'm guessing you 're not a minority or live in a liberal state , so it 's probably easy to sit back and wait for you , but you 're in no place to tell others to do the same .
c211lii
Libertarian
2,011
in what sense can the @@federal government## endorse liberty that it did not in times of greater statelevel oppression ? the @@federal government## was pretty hands off in the 19th century , but liberty was in a horrible state . all of the @@lobbyists## are trying their last ditch effort to get their views recognized as the '' view . when the '' view no longer exists where will they turn to get their agenda pushed ? some states will be affected worse than others , but peer pressure will ultimately win . ultimately is n't good enough . i 'm guessing you 're not a minority or live in a liberal state , so it 's probably easy to sit back and wait for you , but you 're in no place to tell others to do the same .
in what sense can the @@federal government## endorse liberty that it did not in times of greater statelevel oppression ? the federal government was pretty hands off in the 19th century , but liberty was in a horrible state . all of the @@lobbyists## are trying their last ditch effort to get their views recognized as the '' view . when the '' view no longer exists where will they turn to get their agenda pushed ? some states will be affected worse than others , but peer pressure will ultimately win . ultimately is n't good enough . i 'm guessing you 're not a @@minority## or live in a liberal state , so it 's probably easy to sit back and wait for you , but you 're in no place to tell others to do the same .
in what sense can the @@federal government## endorse liberty that it did not in times of greater statelevel oppression ? the @@federal government## was pretty hands off in the 19th century , but liberty was in a horrible state . all of the @@lobbyists## are trying their last ditch effort to get their views recognized as the '' view . when the '' view no longer exists where will they turn to get their agenda pushed ? some states will be affected worse than others , but peer pressure will ultimately win . ultimately is n't good enough . i 'm guessing you 're not a minority or live in a liberal state , so it 's probably easy to sit back and wait for you , but you 're in no place to tell others to do the same .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "in", "what", "sense", "can", "the", "federal", "government", "endorse", "liberty", "that", "it", "did", "not", "in", "times", "of", "greater", "statelevel", "oppression", "?", "the", "federal", "government", "was", "pretty", "hands", "off", "in", "the", "19th", "century", ",", "but", "liberty", "was", "in", "a", "horrible", "state", ".", "all", "of", "the", "lobbyists", "are", "trying", "their", "last", "ditch", "effort", "to", "get", "their", "views", "recognized", "as", "the", "``", "view", ".", "when", "the", "``", "view", "no", "longer", "exists", "where", "will", "they", "turn", "to", "get", "their", "agenda", "pushed", "?", "some", "states", "will", "be", "affected", "worse", "than", "others", ",", "but", "peer", "pressure", "will", "ultimately", "win", ".", "ultimately", "is", "n't", "good", "enough", ".", "i", "'m", "guessing", "you", "'re", "not", "a", "minority", "or", "live", "in", "a", "liberal", "state", ",", "so", "it", "'s", "probably", "easy", "to", "sit", "back", "and", "wait", "for", "you", ",", "but", "you", "'re", "in", "no", "place", "to", "tell", "others", "to", "do", "the", "same", "." ]
the state controls the roads . we disagree as to whether removing speed limits would be stupid .
c1xyqft
Libertarian
2,011
the state controls the roads . we disagree as to whether removing speed limits would be stupid .
the state controls the roads . we disagree as to whether removing speed limits would be stupid .
the state controls the roads . we disagree as to whether removing speed limits would be stupid .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "state", "controls", "the", "roads", ".", "we", "disagree", "as", "to", "whether", "removing", "speed", "limits", "would", "be", "stupid", "." ]
that 'd be true if 100 of people voted . if only 30 of people vote , can you really claim that 's the majority opinion ?
c1ml8e3
Libertarian
2,011
that 'd be true if 100 of people voted . if only 30 of people vote , can you really claim that 's the majority opinion ?
that 'd be true if 100 of people voted . if only 30 of people vote , can you really claim that 's the majority opinion ?
that 'd be true if 100 of people voted . if only 30 of people vote , can you really claim that 's the majority opinion ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "'d", "be", "true", "if", "100", "of", "people", "voted", ".", "if", "only", "30", "of", "people", "vote", ",", "can", "you", "really", "claim", "that", "'s", "the", "majority", "opinion", "?" ]
i 'm not saying one is better than the other , just agreeing with the assessment .
c1tq5it
Libertarian
2,011
i 'm not saying one is better than the other , just agreeing with the assessment .
i 'm not saying one is better than the other , just agreeing with the assessment .
i 'm not saying one is better than the other , just agreeing with the assessment .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "not", "saying", "one", "is", "better", "than", "the", "other", ",", "just", "agreeing", "with", "the", "assessment", "." ]
i have n't checked out the replies there , but i predict it wo n't be wellreceived . the arguments against ron paul in SUBREDDIT seem to mostly run along the lines of he wants the states to be allowed to teach religion in schools '' . i would have voted 'no ' not because i do n't like the motto and do n't think we can use it but 'no ' because we were telling the states what to do , '' paul told the hill . this is just fuel for their fire , in my opinion . many in SUBREDDIT seem to think that federal power is good , because it can be used to restrain the states from doing things they do n't like . sadly very few seem to recognize the doubleedge on the sword , or the fact that the sword is not in the hands of the people at all .
c2x1fw0
Libertarian
2,011
i have n't checked out the replies there , but i predict it wo n't be wellreceived . the arguments against ron paul in SUBREDDIT seem to mostly run along the lines of he wants the states to be allowed to teach religion in schools '' . i would have voted 'no ' not because i do n't like the motto and do n't think we can use it but 'no ' because we were telling the states what to do , '' paul told @@the hill## . this is just fuel for their fire , in my opinion . many in SUBREDDIT seem to think that federal power is good , because it can be used to restrain the states from doing things they do n't like . sadly very few seem to recognize the doubleedge on the sword , or the fact that the sword is not in the hands of the people at all .
i have n't checked out the replies there , but i predict it wo n't be wellreceived . the arguments against ron paul in SUBREDDIT seem to mostly run along the lines of he wants the states to be allowed to teach religion in schools '' . i would have voted 'no ' not because i do n't like the motto and do n't think we can use it but 'no ' because we were telling the states what to do , '' paul told the hill . this is just fuel for their fire , in my opinion . many in SUBREDDIT seem to think that federal power is good , because it can be used to restrain the states from doing things they do n't like . sadly very few seem to recognize the doubleedge on the sword , or the fact that the sword is not in the hands of the people at all .
i have n't checked out the replies there , but i predict it wo n't be wellreceived . the arguments against ron paul in SUBREDDIT seem to mostly run along the lines of he wants the states to be allowed to teach religion in schools '' . i would have voted 'no ' not because i do n't like the motto and do n't think we can use it but 'no ' because we were telling the states what to do , '' paul told the hill . this is just fuel for their fire , in my opinion . many in SUBREDDIT seem to think that federal power is good , because it can be used to restrain the states from doing things they do n't like . sadly very few seem to recognize the doubleedge on the sword , or the fact that the sword is not in the hands of the people at all .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "have", "n't", "checked", "out", "the", "replies", "there", ",", "but", "i", "predict", "it", "wo", "n't", "be", "wellreceived", ".", "the", "arguments", "against", "ron", "paul", "in", "SUBREDDIT", "seem", "to", "mostly", "run", "along", "the", "lines", "of", "he", "wants", "the", "states", "to", "be", "allowed", "to", "teach", "religion", "in", "schools", "``", ".", "i", "would", "have", "voted", "'no", "'", "not", "because", "i", "do", "n't", "like", "the", "motto", "and", "do", "n't", "think", "we", "can", "use", "it", "but", "'no", "'", "because", "we", "were", "telling", "the", "states", "what", "to", "do", ",", "``", "paul", "told", "the", "hill", ".", "this", "is", "just", "fuel", "for", "their", "fire", ",", "in", "my", "opinion", ".", "many", "in", "SUBREDDIT", "seem", "to", "think", "that", "federal", "power", "is", "good", ",", "because", "it", "can", "be", "used", "to", "restrain", "the", "states", "from", "doing", "things", "they", "do", "n't", "like", ".", "sadly", "very", "few", "seem", "to", "recognize", "the", "doubleedge", "on", "the", "sword", ",", "or", "the", "fact", "that", "the", "sword", "is", "not", "in", "the", "hands", "of", "the", "people", "at", "all", "." ]
anarchism or socialism has been the predominant form of benign statist societies . capitalist societies inevitably end up in the equivalent of a dictatorship .
c1udqa1
Libertarian
2,011
anarchism or socialism has been the predominant form of benign statist societies . capitalist societies inevitably end up in the equivalent of a dictatorship .
anarchism or socialism has been the predominant form of @@benign statist societies## . @@capitalist societies## inevitably end up in the equivalent of a dictatorship .
anarchism or socialism has been the predominant form of @@benign statist societies## . @@capitalist societies## inevitably end up in the equivalent of a dictatorship .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "anarchism", "or", "socialism", "has", "been", "the", "predominant", "form", "of", "benign", "statist", "societies", ".", "capitalist", "societies", "inevitably", "end", "up", "in", "the", "equivalent", "of", "a", "dictatorship", "." ]
that 's because real bullets tend to retain some momentum as they tear through the skull leaving a vortex of bone and brain matter behind . i 'm not arguing that rubber bullets are safe though . in fact i 'd probably rather be probably killed instantly by a real bullet than deal with being horribly maimedbrain damagedblinded by a baton round .
c2bamar
Libertarian
2,011
that 's because real bullets tend to retain some momentum as they tear through the skull leaving a vortex of bone and brain matter behind . i 'm not arguing that rubber bullets are safe though . in fact i 'd probably rather be probably killed instantly by a real bullet than deal with being horribly maimedbrain damagedblinded by a baton round .
that 's because real bullets tend to retain some momentum as they tear through the skull leaving a vortex of bone and brain matter behind . i 'm not arguing that rubber bullets are safe though . in fact i 'd probably rather be probably killed instantly by a real bullet than deal with being horribly maimedbrain damagedblinded by a baton round .
that 's because real bullets tend to retain some momentum as they tear through the skull leaving a vortex of bone and brain matter behind . i 'm not arguing that rubber bullets are safe though . in fact i 'd probably rather be probably killed instantly by a real bullet than deal with being horribly maimedbrain damagedblinded by a baton round .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "'s", "because", "real", "bullets", "tend", "to", "retain", "some", "momentum", "as", "they", "tear", "through", "the", "skull", "leaving", "a", "vortex", "of", "bone", "and", "brain", "matter", "behind", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "arguing", "that", "rubber", "bullets", "are", "safe", "though", ".", "in", "fact", "i", "'d", "probably", "rather", "be", "probably", "killed", "instantly", "by", "a", "real", "bullet", "than", "deal", "with", "being", "horribly", "maimedbrain", "damagedblinded", "by", "a", "baton", "round", "." ]
thanks . right now we are at 38 upvotes and 22 downvotes . i have a feeling some of the pseudoprogressives '' or statist democrats who occasionally stalk this reddit are trying to keep this thread down .
c2h4uml
Libertarian
2,011
thanks . right now we are at 38 upvotes and 22 downvotes . i have a feeling some of the @@pseudoprogressives '' or statist democrats who occasionally stalk this reddit## are trying to keep this thread down .
thanks . right now we are at 38 upvotes and 22 downvotes . i have a feeling some of the pseudoprogressives '' or @@statist democrats## who occasionally stalk this reddit are trying to keep this thread down .
thanks . right now we are at 38 upvotes and 22 downvotes . i have a feeling some of the pseudoprogressives '' or @@statist democrats## who occasionally stalk this reddit are trying to keep this thread down .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "thanks", ".", "right", "now", "we", "are", "at", "38", "upvotes", "and", "22", "downvotes", ".", "i", "have", "a", "feeling", "some", "of", "the", "pseudoprogressives", "``", "or", "statist", "democrats", "who", "occasionally", "stalk", "this", "reddit", "are", "trying", "to", "keep", "this", "thread", "down", "." ]
just the overall shittiness . any more questions ?
c1siyd3
Libertarian
2,011
just the overall shittiness . any more questions ?
just the overall shittiness . any more questions ?
just the overall shittiness . any more questions ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "just", "the", "overall", "shittiness", ".", "any", "more", "questions", "?" ]
europe is bogged down by nonsensical laws from the eu . there has plenty of discussion of how insane its gotten , in particular with feminist laws . youve also completely sidestepped the point , as well as put words in my mouth . if the supreme court rules a law unconstitutional , then thats the end of it . i do not support violence against fellow americans . its up to texas to decide whether it wants to secede from the us in order to keep its antisodomy laws . decentralization will not occur if state governments are allowed to run free . we already have this problem with states and gun control laws . there is no system of protecting counties from overbearing states . hence , states like california , illinois , michigan , etc . are slowly crumbling from within mainly because of unions . edit i find it disturbing how people in this subreddit go to extreme lengths to defend ron paul . the man is human , he can be wrong about some things .
c2fitra
Libertarian
2,011
@@europe## is bogged down by nonsensical laws from @@the eu## . there has plenty of discussion of how insane its gotten , in particular with feminist laws . youve also completely sidestepped the point , as well as put words in my mouth . if the @@supreme court## rules a law unconstitutional , then thats the end of it . i do not support violence against fellow @@americans## . its up to @@texas## to decide whether it wants to secede from the us in order to keep its antisodomy laws . decentralization will not occur if @@state governments## are allowed to run free . we already have this problem with states and gun control laws . there is no system of protecting counties from overbearing states . hence , states like california , illinois , michigan , etc . are slowly crumbling from within mainly because of unions . edit i find it disturbing how @@people in this subreddit## go to extreme lengths to defend ron paul . the man is human , he can be wrong about some things .
europe is bogged down by nonsensical laws from the eu . there has plenty of discussion of how insane its gotten , in particular with feminist laws . youve also completely sidestepped the point , as well as put words in my mouth . if the supreme court rules a law unconstitutional , then thats the end of it . i do not support violence against fellow @@americans## . its up to texas to decide whether it wants to secede from @@the us## in order to keep its antisodomy laws . decentralization will not occur if @@state governments## are allowed to run free . we already have this problem with states and gun control laws . there is no system of protecting counties from overbearing states . hence , states like california , illinois , michigan , etc . are slowly crumbling from within mainly because of unions . edit i find it disturbing how @@people in this subreddit## go to extreme lengths to defend ron paul . the man is human , he can be wrong about some things .
@@europe## is bogged down by nonsensical laws from @@the eu## . there has plenty of discussion of how insane its gotten , in particular with feminist laws . youve also completely sidestepped the point , as well as put words in my mouth . if the @@supreme court## rules a law unconstitutional , then thats the end of it . i do not support violence against fellow @@americans## . its up to @@texas## to decide whether it wants to secede from the us in order to keep its antisodomy laws . decentralization will not occur if @@state governments## are allowed to run free . we already have this problem with states and gun control laws . there is no system of protecting counties from overbearing states . hence , states like california , illinois , michigan , etc . are slowly crumbling from within mainly because of unions . edit i find it disturbing how @@people in this subreddit## go to extreme lengths to defend ron paul . the man is human , he can be wrong about some things .
[ "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "europe", "is", "bogged", "down", "by", "nonsensical", "laws", "from", "the", "eu", ".", "there", "has", "plenty", "of", "discussion", "of", "how", "insane", "its", "gotten", ",", "in", "particular", "with", "feminist", "laws", ".", "youve", "also", "completely", "sidestepped", "the", "point", ",", "as", "well", "as", "put", "words", "in", "my", "mouth", ".", "if", "the", "supreme", "court", "rules", "a", "law", "unconstitutional", ",", "then", "thats", "the", "end", "of", "it", ".", "i", "do", "not", "support", "violence", "against", "fellow", "americans", ".", "its", "up", "to", "texas", "to", "decide", "whether", "it", "wants", "to", "secede", "from", "the", "us", "in", "order", "to", "keep", "its", "antisodomy", "laws", ".", "decentralization", "will", "not", "occur", "if", "state", "governments", "are", "allowed", "to", "run", "free", ".", "we", "already", "have", "this", "problem", "with", "states", "and", "gun", "control", "laws", ".", "there", "is", "no", "system", "of", "protecting", "counties", "from", "overbearing", "states", ".", "hence", ",", "states", "like", "california", ",", "illinois", ",", "michigan", ",", "etc", ".", "are", "slowly", "crumbling", "from", "within", "mainly", "because", "of", "unions", ".", "edit", "i", "find", "it", "disturbing", "how", "people", "in", "this", "subreddit", "go", "to", "extreme", "lengths", "to", "defend", "ron", "paul", ".", "the", "man", "is", "human", ",", "he", "can", "be", "wrong", "about", "some", "things", "." ]
in contrast to other videos of officers with some very questionable behaviour , this clip almost makes one shed a tear
c2gzuk5
Libertarian
2,011
in contrast to other videos of @@officers## with some very questionable behaviour , this clip almost makes one shed a tear
in contrast to other videos of officers with some very questionable behaviour , this clip almost makes one shed a tear
in contrast to other videos of @@officers## with some very questionable behaviour , this clip almost makes one shed a tear
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "in", "contrast", "to", "other", "videos", "of", "officers", "with", "some", "very", "questionable", "behaviour", ",", "this", "clip", "almost", "makes", "one", "shed", "a", "tear" ]
but what about nuclear bombs ? you want people to have nuclear bombs in their back yard ! statist
c2c9qnu
Libertarian
2,011
but what about nuclear bombs ? you want people to have nuclear bombs in their back yard ! statist
but what about nuclear bombs ? you want people to have nuclear bombs in their back yard ! statist
but what about nuclear bombs ? you want people to have nuclear bombs in their back yard ! statist
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "what", "about", "nuclear", "bombs", "?", "you", "want", "people", "to", "have", "nuclear", "bombs", "in", "their", "back", "yard", "!", "statist" ]
oh bullshit . you do n't write legislation specifically authorizing a state government to restrict individual liberty and then throw up your hands and say well , its up to the states to defend liberty now ! '' that 's a total copout . the current law protects individual rights . trying to override the scotus decision invites more government intrusion into private life . ron paul is threatening to use his power as a federal agent to kick down the door for state agencies to violently repress a woman 's right to her own body . he 's working handinglove with the state legislatures .
c2ddzbm
Libertarian
2,011
oh bullshit . you do n't write legislation specifically authorizing a @@state government## to restrict individual liberty and then throw up your hands and say well , its up to the states to defend liberty now ! '' that 's a total copout . the current law protects individual rights . trying to override the scotus decision invites more government intrusion into private life . ron paul is threatening to use his power as a federal agent to kick down the door for @@state agencies## to violently repress a woman 's right to her own body . he 's working handinglove with the state legislatures .
oh bullshit . you do n't write legislation specifically authorizing a state government to restrict individual liberty and then throw up your hands and say well , its up to the states to defend liberty now ! '' that 's a total copout . the current law protects individual rights . trying to override the scotus decision invites more government intrusion into private life . ron paul is threatening to use his power as a federal agent to kick down the door for @@state agencies## to violently repress a woman 's right to her own body . he 's working handinglove with the state legislatures .
oh bullshit . you do n't write legislation specifically authorizing a @@state government## to restrict individual liberty and then throw up your hands and say well , its up to the states to defend liberty now ! '' that 's a total copout . the current law protects individual rights . trying to override the scotus decision invites more government intrusion into private life . ron paul is threatening to use his power as a federal agent to kick down the door for @@state agencies## to violently repress a woman 's right to her own body . he 's working handinglove with the state legislatures .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "oh", "bullshit", ".", "you", "do", "n't", "write", "legislation", "specifically", "authorizing", "a", "state", "government", "to", "restrict", "individual", "liberty", "and", "then", "throw", "up", "your", "hands", "and", "say", "well", ",", "its", "up", "to", "the", "states", "to", "defend", "liberty", "now", "!", "``", "that", "'s", "a", "total", "copout", ".", "the", "current", "law", "protects", "individual", "rights", ".", "trying", "to", "override", "the", "scotus", "decision", "invites", "more", "government", "intrusion", "into", "private", "life", ".", "ron", "paul", "is", "threatening", "to", "use", "his", "power", "as", "a", "federal", "agent", "to", "kick", "down", "the", "door", "for", "state", "agencies", "to", "violently", "repress", "a", "woman", "'s", "right", "to", "her", "own", "body", ".", "he", "'s", "working", "handinglove", "with", "the", "state", "legislatures", "." ]
that could be the case . i 'm not really sure it might also depend on whether the group views themselves as rejected and repressed by society , which i think socialists do moreso than libertarians .
c1p2kev
Libertarian
2,011
that could be the case . i 'm not really sure it might also depend on whether the group views themselves as rejected and repressed by society , which i think @@socialists## do moreso than @@libertarians## .
that could be the case . i 'm not really sure it might also depend on whether the group views themselves as rejected and repressed by society , which i think @@socialists## do moreso than @@libertarians## .
that could be the case . i 'm not really sure it might also depend on whether the group views themselves as rejected and repressed by society , which i think @@socialists## do moreso than @@libertarians## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "that", "could", "be", "the", "case", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "really", "sure", "it", "might", "also", "depend", "on", "whether", "the", "group", "views", "themselves", "as", "rejected", "and", "repressed", "by", "society", ",", "which", "i", "think", "socialists", "do", "moreso", "than", "libertarians", "." ]
that was the worst ron paul pun the world has ever seen . you get a gold star .
c341m5f
Libertarian
2,011
that was the worst ron paul pun the world has ever seen . you get a gold star .
that was the worst ron paul pun the world has ever seen . you get a gold star .
that was the worst ron paul pun the world has ever seen . you get a gold star .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "was", "the", "worst", "ron", "paul", "pun", "the", "world", "has", "ever", "seen", ".", "you", "get", "a", "gold", "star", "." ]
tea party 's prime was definitely during '10 buddy , it started after paul dropped out of the primaries .
c1yu9t9
Libertarian
2,011
tea party 's prime was definitely during '10 buddy , it started after paul dropped out of the primaries .
tea party 's prime was definitely during '10 buddy , it started after paul dropped out of the primaries .
tea party 's prime was definitely during '10 buddy , it started after paul dropped out of the primaries .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "tea", "party", "'s", "prime", "was", "definitely", "during", "'10", "buddy", ",", "it", "started", "after", "paul", "dropped", "out", "of", "the", "primaries", "." ]
other people are not your property . their property is not yours to plunder . this does n't change if they have more than you do .
c1ur4g3
Libertarian
2,011
other people are not your property . their property is not yours to plunder . this does n't change if they have more than you do .
other people are not your property . their property is not yours to plunder . this does n't change if they have more than you do .
other people are not your property . their property is not yours to plunder . this does n't change if they have more than you do .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "other", "people", "are", "not", "your", "property", ".", "their", "property", "is", "not", "yours", "to", "plunder", ".", "this", "does", "n't", "change", "if", "they", "have", "more", "than", "you", "do", "." ]
here 's URL a good one . yes , that 's one of the most powerful men in the world .
c2zwp09
Libertarian
2,011
here 's URL a good one . yes , that 's one of the most powerful men in the world .
here 's URL a good one . yes , that 's one of the most powerful men in the world .
here 's URL a good one . yes , that 's one of the most powerful men in the world .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "here", "'s", "URL", "a", "good", "one", ".", "yes", ",", "that", "'s", "one", "of", "the", "most", "powerful", "men", "in", "the", "world", "." ]
are you serious ? the democrats say no need to discuss '' time to act , gov't control . the republicans say there is no problem because god says so ! '' i do n't see either side really discussing '' much .
c1nr34j
Libertarian
2,011
are you serious ? the @@democrats## say no need to discuss '' time to act , gov't control . the @@republicans## say there is no problem because god says so ! '' i do n't see either side really discussing '' much .
are you serious ? the @@democrats## say no need to discuss '' time to act , gov't control . the @@republicans## say there is no problem because god says so ! '' i do n't see either side really discussing '' much .
are you serious ? the @@democrats## say no need to discuss '' time to act , gov't control . the @@republicans## say there is no problem because god says so ! '' i do n't see either side really discussing '' much .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "are", "you", "serious", "?", "the", "democrats", "say", "no", "need", "to", "discuss", "``", "time", "to", "act", ",", "gov't", "control", ".", "the", "republicans", "say", "there", "is", "no", "problem", "because", "god", "says", "so", "!", "``", "i", "do", "n't", "see", "either", "side", "really", "discussing", "``", "much", "." ]
i am sorry but i do not understand your question , pretty good chances that you did n't understand my point .
c1poihv
Libertarian
2,011
i am sorry but i do not understand your question , pretty good chances that you did n't understand my point .
i am sorry but i do not understand your question , pretty good chances that you did n't understand my point .
i am sorry but i do not understand your question , pretty good chances that you did n't understand my point .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "am", "sorry", "but", "i", "do", "not", "understand", "your", "question", ",", "pretty", "good", "chances", "that", "you", "did", "n't", "understand", "my", "point", "." ]
honestly that 's fine . this is the sort of legislation that should be done at a municipal level . the problem is when this sort of thing happens at the federal , or even state level . plastic bags can be harmful . ultimately the retailers should be the ones behind this , not legislation , but i think pollution is a problem and this might be justified . i do n't know why everybody does n't just use reusable bags . it seems pretty simple .
c25au5o
Libertarian
2,011
honestly that 's fine . this is the sort of legislation that should be done at a municipal level . the problem is when this sort of thing happens at the federal , or even state level . plastic bags can be harmful . ultimately the @@retailers## should be the ones behind this , not legislation , but i think pollution is a problem and this might be justified . i do n't know why everybody does n't just use reusable bags . it seems pretty simple .
honestly that 's fine . this is the sort of legislation that should be done at a municipal level . the problem is when this sort of thing happens at the federal , or even state level . plastic bags can be harmful . ultimately the retailers should be the ones behind this , not legislation , but i think pollution is a problem and this might be justified . i do n't know why everybody does n't just use reusable bags . it seems pretty simple .
honestly that 's fine . this is the sort of legislation that should be done at a municipal level . the problem is when this sort of thing happens at the federal , or even state level . plastic bags can be harmful . ultimately the retailers should be the ones behind this , not legislation , but i think pollution is a problem and this might be justified . i do n't know why everybody does n't just use reusable bags . it seems pretty simple .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "honestly", "that", "'s", "fine", ".", "this", "is", "the", "sort", "of", "legislation", "that", "should", "be", "done", "at", "a", "municipal", "level", ".", "the", "problem", "is", "when", "this", "sort", "of", "thing", "happens", "at", "the", "federal", ",", "or", "even", "state", "level", ".", "plastic", "bags", "can", "be", "harmful", ".", "ultimately", "the", "retailers", "should", "be", "the", "ones", "behind", "this", ",", "not", "legislation", ",", "but", "i", "think", "pollution", "is", "a", "problem", "and", "this", "might", "be", "justified", ".", "i", "do", "n't", "know", "why", "everybody", "does", "n't", "just", "use", "reusable", "bags", ".", "it", "seems", "pretty", "simple", "." ]
since voting has turned into deciding who gets more money from the government handouts , i think its only fair to show id when you come asking for more money . it simply comes down to one issue ... if the id 's are free , then there is no legitimate argument to be made against it , people that try to make this 'its a poll tax ' argument are just wasting their breath . every state that has done this has ensured that id 's are available for free .
c5y5fej
Libertarian
2,012
since voting has turned into deciding who gets more money from the government handouts , i think its only fair to show id when you come asking for more money . it simply comes down to one issue ... if the id 's are free , then there is no legitimate argument to be made against it , people that try to make this 'its a poll tax ' argument are just wasting their breath . every state that has done this has ensured that id 's are available for free .
since voting has turned into deciding who gets more money from the government handouts , i think its only fair to show id when you come asking for more money . it simply comes down to one issue ... if the id 's are free , then there is no legitimate argument to be made against it , people that try to make this 'its a poll tax ' argument are just wasting their breath . every state that has done this has ensured that id 's are available for free .
since voting has turned into deciding who gets more money from the government handouts , i think its only fair to show id when you come asking for more money . it simply comes down to one issue ... if the id 's are free , then there is no legitimate argument to be made against it , people that try to make this 'its a poll tax ' argument are just wasting their breath . every state that has done this has ensured that id 's are available for free .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "since", "voting", "has", "turned", "into", "deciding", "who", "gets", "more", "money", "from", "the", "government", "handouts", ",", "i", "think", "its", "only", "fair", "to", "show", "id", "when", "you", "come", "asking", "for", "more", "money", ".", "it", "simply", "comes", "down", "to", "one", "issue", "...", "if", "the", "id", "'s", "are", "free", ",", "then", "there", "is", "no", "legitimate", "argument", "to", "be", "made", "against", "it", ",", "people", "that", "try", "to", "make", "this", "'its", "a", "poll", "tax", "'", "argument", "are", "just", "wasting", "their", "breath", ".", "every", "state", "that", "has", "done", "this", "has", "ensured", "that", "id", "'s", "are", "available", "for", "free", "." ]
indians have it much worse when it comes to an oppressive , bureaucratic , financially debilitating government than americans do .
c4a9sc7
Libertarian
2,012
@@indians## have it much worse when it comes to an oppressive , bureaucratic , financially debilitating government than @@americans## do .
@@indians## have it much worse when it comes to an oppressive , bureaucratic , financially debilitating government than @@americans## do .
@@indians## have it much worse when it comes to an oppressive , bureaucratic , financially debilitating government than @@americans## do .
[ "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0 ]
[ "indians", "have", "it", "much", "worse", "when", "it", "comes", "to", "an", "oppressive", ",", "bureaucratic", ",", "financially", "debilitating", "government", "than", "americans", "do", "." ]
depends on the issue . gun rights , you 're an nra shill . deregulation , you 're on the koch 's payroll hah ! i wish i could get paid to post about what i believe in environmental issues you must be a bp stooge . taxes , you 're a dumb teabagger . minimum wages , you must be a walmart executive . and the catchall , of course , if all of the above fails racist ! '' for example URL i get called a racist merely for pointing out that msnbc is just as prone to bias and misrepresentation as fox . its laughably predictable . there is literally no way that you could surmise racism from this post . but liberals , liberals find a way .
c7gb6ch
Libertarian
2,012
depends on the issue . gun rights , you 're an nra shill . deregulation , you 're on the koch 's payroll hah ! i wish i could get paid to post about what i believe in environmental issues you must be a bp stooge . taxes , you 're a dumb teabagger . minimum wages , you must be a walmart executive . and the catchall , of course , if all of the above fails racist ! '' for example URL i get called a racist merely for pointing out that @@msnbc## is just as prone to bias and misrepresentation as @@fox## . its laughably predictable . there is literally no way that you could surmise racism from this post . but @@liberals## , @@liberals## find a way .
depends on the issue . gun rights , you 're an nra shill . deregulation , you 're on the @@koch 's## payroll hah ! i wish i could get paid to post about what i believe in environmental issues you must be a bp stooge . taxes , you 're a dumb teabagger . minimum wages , you must be a walmart executive . and the catchall , of course , if all of the above fails racist ! '' for example URL i get called a racist merely for pointing out that @@msnbc## is just as prone to bias and misrepresentation as @@fox## . its laughably predictable . there is literally no way that you could surmise racism from this post . but @@liberals## , @@liberals## find a way .
depends on the issue . gun rights , you 're an nra shill . deregulation , you 're on the @@koch 's## payroll hah ! i wish i could get paid to post about what i believe in environmental issues you must be a bp stooge . taxes , you 're a dumb teabagger . minimum wages , you must be a walmart executive . and the catchall , of course , if all of the above fails racist ! '' for example URL i get called a racist merely for pointing out that @@msnbc## is just as prone to bias and misrepresentation as @@fox## . its laughably predictable . there is literally no way that you could surmise racism from this post . but @@liberals## , @@liberals## find a way .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "depends", "on", "the", "issue", ".", "gun", "rights", ",", "you", "'re", "an", "nra", "shill", ".", "deregulation", ",", "you", "'re", "on", "the", "koch", "'s", "payroll", "hah", "!", "i", "wish", "i", "could", "get", "paid", "to", "post", "about", "what", "i", "believe", "in", "environmental", "issues", "you", "must", "be", "a", "bp", "stooge", ".", "taxes", ",", "you", "'re", "a", "dumb", "teabagger", ".", "minimum", "wages", ",", "you", "must", "be", "a", "walmart", "executive", ".", "and", "the", "catchall", ",", "of", "course", ",", "if", "all", "of", "the", "above", "fails", "racist", "!", "``", "for", "example", "URL", "i", "get", "called", "a", "racist", "merely", "for", "pointing", "out", "that", "msnbc", "is", "just", "as", "prone", "to", "bias", "and", "misrepresentation", "as", "fox", ".", "its", "laughably", "predictable", ".", "there", "is", "literally", "no", "way", "that", "you", "could", "surmise", "racism", "from", "this", "post", ".", "but", "liberals", ",", "liberals", "find", "a", "way", "." ]
che and gandhi , two of a kind .
c7oxs63
Libertarian
2,012
che and gandhi , two of a kind .
che and gandhi , two of a kind .
che and gandhi , two of a kind .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "che", "and", "gandhi", ",", "two", "of", "a", "kind", "." ]
indeed . demublicans have steered us to the brink of disaster but their way is better and everyone else is crazy . amazing how that works .
c6jvw2t
Libertarian
2,012
indeed . @@demublicans## have steered us to the brink of disaster but their way is better and everyone else is crazy . amazing how that works .
indeed . @@demublicans## have steered us to the brink of disaster but their way is better and everyone else is crazy . amazing how that works .
indeed . @@demublicans## have steered us to the brink of disaster but their way is better and everyone else is crazy . amazing how that works .
[ "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "indeed", ".", "demublicans", "have", "steered", "us", "to", "the", "brink", "of", "disaster", "but", "their", "way", "is", "better", "and", "everyone", "else", "is", "crazy", ".", "amazing", "how", "that", "works", "." ]
not really . youre forgetting the other side to that coin . libertarians are as liberal as they come on social issues but fiscally conservative .
c3ecyia
Libertarian
2,012
not really . youre forgetting the other side to that coin . @@libertarians## are as liberal as they come on social issues but fiscally conservative .
not really . youre forgetting the other side to that coin . @@libertarians## are as @@liberal## as they come on social issues but fiscally conservative .
not really . youre forgetting the other side to that coin . @@libertarians## are as liberal as they come on social issues but fiscally conservative .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "really", ".", "youre", "forgetting", "the", "other", "side", "to", "that", "coin", ".", "libertarians", "are", "as", "liberal", "as", "they", "come", "on", "social", "issues", "but", "fiscally", "conservative", "." ]
i wonder how SUBREDDIT would respond to this .
c7lancz
Libertarian
2,012
i wonder how SUBREDDIT would respond to this .
i wonder how SUBREDDIT would respond to this .
i wonder how SUBREDDIT would respond to this .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "wonder", "how", "SUBREDDIT", "would", "respond", "to", "this", "." ]
none of those things you mention would exist if the government had n't done the costly and unprofitable fundamental research .
c3jfczc
Libertarian
2,012
none of those things you mention would exist if the government had n't done the costly and unprofitable fundamental research .
none of those things you mention would exist if the government had n't done the costly and unprofitable fundamental research .
none of those things you mention would exist if the government had n't done the costly and unprofitable fundamental research .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "none", "of", "those", "things", "you", "mention", "would", "exist", "if", "the", "government", "had", "n't", "done", "the", "costly", "and", "unprofitable", "fundamental", "research", "." ]
SUBREDDIT is not your personal army .
c3outn7
Libertarian
2,012
SUBREDDIT is not your personal army .
SUBREDDIT is not your personal army .
SUBREDDIT is not your personal army .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "SUBREDDIT", "is", "not", "your", "personal", "army", "." ]
i 'd be curious to hear some incorrect predictions from krugman .
c7i9dni
Libertarian
2,012
i 'd be curious to hear some incorrect predictions from krugman .
i 'd be curious to hear some incorrect predictions from krugman .
i 'd be curious to hear some incorrect predictions from krugman .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'d", "be", "curious", "to", "hear", "some", "incorrect", "predictions", "from", "krugman", "." ]
like i said , below '' thanks , eric holder , for clearing up a nonexistent legal distinction that the founders specifically protected against , just for political expediency . '' what he said is so staggeringly idiotic , and provably incorrect , that he has made the american people dumber . i know it 's a genius line from billy madison , but it 's true . every time someone in authority asserts , and justifies the assertion of , illegal power , it makes the entire country desensitized to injustice and teaches developing minds that it 's okay for authority to not follow the rules . do as i say , not do as i do '' is the motto of shitty parents and corrupt authorities .
c46drjb
Libertarian
2,012
like i said , below '' thanks , eric holder , for clearing up a nonexistent legal distinction that the @@founders## specifically protected against , just for political expediency . '' what he said is so staggeringly idiotic , and provably incorrect , that he has made the @@american people## dumber . i know it 's a genius line from billy madison , but it 's true . every time someone in authority asserts , and justifies the assertion of , illegal power , it makes the entire country desensitized to injustice and teaches developing minds that it 's okay for authority to not follow the rules . do as i say , not do as i do '' is the motto of shitty parents and corrupt authorities .
like i said , below '' thanks , eric holder , for clearing up a nonexistent legal distinction that the founders specifically protected against , just for political expediency . '' what he said is so staggeringly idiotic , and provably incorrect , that he has made the @@american people## dumber . i know it 's a genius line from billy madison , but it 's true . every time someone in authority asserts , and justifies the assertion of , illegal power , it makes the entire country desensitized to injustice and teaches developing minds that it 's okay for authority to not follow the rules . do as i say , not do as i do '' is the motto of @@shitty parents## and @@corrupt authorities## .
like i said , below '' thanks , eric holder , for clearing up a nonexistent legal distinction that the founders specifically protected against , just for political expediency . '' what he said is so staggeringly idiotic , and provably incorrect , that he has made the @@american people## dumber . i know it 's a genius line from billy madison , but it 's true . every time someone in authority asserts , and justifies the assertion of , illegal power , it makes the entire country desensitized to injustice and teaches developing minds that it 's okay for authority to not follow the rules . do as i say , not do as i do '' is the motto of @@shitty parents## and @@corrupt authorities## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]
[ "like", "i", "said", ",", "below", "``", "thanks", ",", "eric", "holder", ",", "for", "clearing", "up", "a", "nonexistent", "legal", "distinction", "that", "the", "founders", "specifically", "protected", "against", ",", "just", "for", "political", "expediency", ".", "``", "what", "he", "said", "is", "so", "staggeringly", "idiotic", ",", "and", "provably", "incorrect", ",", "that", "he", "has", "made", "the", "american", "people", "dumber", ".", "i", "know", "it", "'s", "a", "genius", "line", "from", "billy", "madison", ",", "but", "it", "'s", "true", ".", "every", "time", "someone", "in", "authority", "asserts", ",", "and", "justifies", "the", "assertion", "of", ",", "illegal", "power", ",", "it", "makes", "the", "entire", "country", "desensitized", "to", "injustice", "and", "teaches", "developing", "minds", "that", "it", "'s", "okay", "for", "authority", "to", "not", "follow", "the", "rules", ".", "do", "as", "i", "say", ",", "not", "do", "as", "i", "do", "``", "is", "the", "motto", "of", "shitty", "parents", "and", "corrupt", "authorities", "." ]
i 'm sure the rate of minimum wage has a marginal utlity curve which places an upper bound on the rate . if you look at australia , their rate falls around 14 dollars an hour yet their unemployment rate is like 4 percent or something . it would probably be easier to just institute a basic minimum income system and really ramp up worker 's rights protections instead of a a minimum wage system if you 're looking to avoid a long list of side laws to counteract the discrepancy a high minimum wage would have on very profit thin company with abused labor versus profit heavy companies that also abuse labor .
c4g1fjw
Libertarian
2,012
i 'm sure the rate of minimum wage has a marginal utlity curve which places an upper bound on the rate . if you look at australia , their rate falls around 14 dollars an hour yet their unemployment rate is like 4 percent or something . it would probably be easier to just institute a basic minimum income system and really ramp up @@worker## 's rights protections instead of a a minimum wage system if you 're looking to avoid a long list of side laws to counteract the discrepancy a high minimum wage would have on very profit thin company with abused labor versus profit heavy companies that also abuse labor .
i 'm sure the rate of minimum wage has a marginal utlity curve which places an upper bound on the rate . if you look at @@australia## , their rate falls around 14 dollars an hour yet their unemployment rate is like 4 percent or something . it would probably be easier to just institute a basic minimum income system and really ramp up worker 's rights protections instead of a a minimum wage system if you 're looking to avoid a long list of side laws to counteract the discrepancy a high minimum wage would have on very @@profit thin company## with abused labor versus @@profit heavy companies## that also abuse labor .
i 'm sure the rate of minimum wage has a marginal utlity curve which places an upper bound on the rate . if you look at @@australia## , their rate falls around 14 dollars an hour yet their unemployment rate is like 4 percent or something . it would probably be easier to just institute a basic minimum income system and really ramp up worker 's rights protections instead of a a minimum wage system if you 're looking to avoid a long list of side laws to counteract the discrepancy a high minimum wage would have on very @@profit thin company## with abused labor versus @@profit heavy companies## that also abuse labor .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "sure", "the", "rate", "of", "minimum", "wage", "has", "a", "marginal", "utlity", "curve", "which", "places", "an", "upper", "bound", "on", "the", "rate", ".", "if", "you", "look", "at", "australia", ",", "their", "rate", "falls", "around", "14", "dollars", "an", "hour", "yet", "their", "unemployment", "rate", "is", "like", "4", "percent", "or", "something", ".", "it", "would", "probably", "be", "easier", "to", "just", "institute", "a", "basic", "minimum", "income", "system", "and", "really", "ramp", "up", "worker", "'s", "rights", "protections", "instead", "of", "a", "a", "minimum", "wage", "system", "if", "you", "'re", "looking", "to", "avoid", "a", "long", "list", "of", "side", "laws", "to", "counteract", "the", "discrepancy", "a", "high", "minimum", "wage", "would", "have", "on", "very", "profit", "thin", "company", "with", "abused", "labor", "versus", "profit", "heavy", "companies", "that", "also", "abuse", "labor", "." ]
the sifi channel remake of bsg was fucking beautiful . if anyone here has somehow failed to see it , fix that asap . oh god ! all the guilt is so heavy .
c49oucw
Libertarian
2,012
the sifi channel remake of bsg was fucking beautiful . if anyone here has somehow failed to see it , fix that asap . oh god ! all the guilt is so heavy .
@@the sifi channel## remake of bsg was fucking beautiful . if anyone here has somehow failed to see it , fix that asap . oh god ! all the guilt is so heavy .
the sifi channel remake of bsg was fucking beautiful . if anyone here has somehow failed to see it , fix that asap . oh god ! all the guilt is so heavy .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "sifi", "channel", "remake", "of", "bsg", "was", "fucking", "beautiful", ".", "if", "anyone", "here", "has", "somehow", "failed", "to", "see", "it", ",", "fix", "that", "asap", ".", "oh", "god", "!", "all", "the", "guilt", "is", "so", "heavy", "." ]
you do not control strangers ' bodies .
c4xppga
Libertarian
2,012
you do not control strangers ' bodies .
you do not control strangers ' bodies .
you do not control strangers ' bodies .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "do", "not", "control", "strangers", "'", "bodies", "." ]
lol ... the whole point of the convention is for the delegates to choose the nominee . so , what you 're saying , is the point of the convention is for the establishment to continue to be all establishy and stuff .
c5yzafh
Libertarian
2,012
lol ... the whole point of the convention is for the @@delegates## to choose the nominee . so , what you 're saying , is the point of the convention is for the establishment to continue to be all establishy and stuff .
lol ... the whole point of the convention is for @@the delegates## to choose the nominee . so , what you 're saying , is the point of the convention is for the establishment to continue to be all establishy and stuff .
lol ... the whole point of the convention is for the @@delegates## to choose the nominee . so , what you 're saying , is the point of the convention is for the establishment to continue to be all establishy and stuff .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "lol", "...", "the", "whole", "point", "of", "the", "convention", "is", "for", "the", "delegates", "to", "choose", "the", "nominee", ".", "so", ",", "what", "you", "'re", "saying", ",", "is", "the", "point", "of", "the", "convention", "is", "for", "the", "establishment", "to", "continue", "to", "be", "all", "establishy", "and", "stuff", "." ]
i wonder why he would post with this username here . i have him tagged as mossad trash '' .
c63fpq6
Libertarian
2,012
i wonder why he would post with this username here . i have him tagged as mossad trash '' .
i wonder why he would post with this username here . i have him tagged as mossad trash '' .
i wonder why he would post with this username here . i have him tagged as mossad trash '' .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "wonder", "why", "he", "would", "post", "with", "this", "username", "here", ".", "i", "have", "him", "tagged", "as", "mossad", "trash", "``", "." ]
glove compartment gon na get my cash cuz the crooked cops tryin to come up fast '' one of the infinite wisdoms of chamillionaire
c4pol0j
Libertarian
2,012
glove compartment gon na get my cash cuz the @@crooked cops## tryin to come up fast '' one of the infinite wisdoms of chamillionaire
glove compartment gon na get my cash cuz the @@crooked cops## tryin to come up fast '' one of the infinite wisdoms of chamillionaire
glove compartment gon na get my cash cuz the @@crooked cops## tryin to come up fast '' one of the infinite wisdoms of chamillionaire
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "glove", "compartment", "gon", "na", "get", "my", "cash", "cuz", "the", "crooked", "cops", "tryin", "to", "come", "up", "fast", "``", "one", "of", "the", "infinite", "wisdoms", "of", "chamillionaire" ]
you 're assuming that there 's only roughly three actual political philosophies , and that everyone in those philosophies all think the same thing . i actually doubt that more than 1 of the population at most oppose all the nonhighlighted things and support gay marriage this was probably just made to cater towards a narrow community . and SUBREDDIT 's upvoting it because i dunno , they do n't fucking read shit before upvoting it .
c4sjelx
Libertarian
2,012
you 're assuming that there 's only roughly three actual political philosophies , and that everyone in those philosophies all think the same thing . i actually doubt that more than 1 of the population at most oppose all the nonhighlighted things and support gay marriage this was probably just made to cater towards a narrow community . and SUBREDDIT 's upvoting it because i dunno , they do n't fucking read shit before upvoting it .
you 're assuming that there 's only roughly three actual political philosophies , and that everyone in those philosophies all think the same thing . i actually doubt that more than 1 of the population at most oppose all the nonhighlighted things and support gay marriage this was probably just made to cater towards a narrow community . and SUBREDDIT 's upvoting it because i dunno , they do n't fucking read shit before upvoting it .
you 're assuming that there 's only roughly three actual political philosophies , and that everyone in those philosophies all think the same thing . i actually doubt that more than 1 of the population at most oppose all the nonhighlighted things and support gay marriage this was probably just made to cater towards a narrow community . and SUBREDDIT 's upvoting it because i dunno , they do n't fucking read shit before upvoting it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "'re", "assuming", "that", "there", "'s", "only", "roughly", "three", "actual", "political", "philosophies", ",", "and", "that", "everyone", "in", "those", "philosophies", "all", "think", "the", "same", "thing", ".", "i", "actually", "doubt", "that", "more", "than", "1", "of", "the", "population", "at", "most", "oppose", "all", "the", "nonhighlighted", "things", "and", "support", "gay", "marriage", "this", "was", "probably", "just", "made", "to", "cater", "towards", "a", "narrow", "community", ".", "and", "SUBREDDIT", "'s", "upvoting", "it", "because", "i", "dunno", ",", "they", "do", "n't", "fucking", "read", "shit", "before", "upvoting", "it", "." ]
because east coasters typically need to stay prepared for hurricanes and 15ft waves .
c6uefdg
Libertarian
2,012
because @@east coasters## typically need to stay prepared for hurricanes and 15ft waves .
because @@east coasters## typically need to stay prepared for hurricanes and 15ft waves .
because @@east coasters## typically need to stay prepared for hurricanes and 15ft waves .
[ "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "because", "east", "coasters", "typically", "need", "to", "stay", "prepared", "for", "hurricanes", "and", "15ft", "waves", "." ]
i think i 'm going to break the last part off and make it its own question ...
c66oymf
Libertarian
2,012
i think i 'm going to break the last part off and make it its own question ...
i think i 'm going to break the last part off and make it its own question ...
i think i 'm going to break the last part off and make it its own question ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "think", "i", "'m", "going", "to", "break", "the", "last", "part", "off", "and", "make", "it", "its", "own", "question", "..." ]
no , the law sends you to jail for showing contempt for the court . she could have gotten out by showing remorse for her actions . you do get that this is not even slightly new or unusual do n't you ?
c5a4m1e
Libertarian
2,012
no , the law sends you to jail for showing contempt for the court . she could have gotten out by showing remorse for her actions . you do get that this is not even slightly new or unusual do n't you ?
no , the law sends you to jail for showing contempt for @@the court## . she could have gotten out by showing remorse for her actions . you do get that this is not even slightly new or unusual do n't you ?
no , the law sends you to jail for showing contempt for @@the court## . she could have gotten out by showing remorse for her actions . you do get that this is not even slightly new or unusual do n't you ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "the", "law", "sends", "you", "to", "jail", "for", "showing", "contempt", "for", "the", "court", ".", "she", "could", "have", "gotten", "out", "by", "showing", "remorse", "for", "her", "actions", ".", "you", "do", "get", "that", "this", "is", "not", "even", "slightly", "new", "or", "unusual", "do", "n't", "you", "?" ]
this drawing is stupid . even the second one is 'to each according to his needs ' . each one got as much box as they needed . just goes to show that so called conservatives are just communists in different clothing .
c7l8scx
Libertarian
2,012
this drawing is stupid . even the second one is 'to each according to his needs ' . each one got as much box as they needed . just goes to show that so called @@conservatives## are just @@communists## in different clothing .
this drawing is stupid . even the second one is 'to each according to his needs ' . each one got as much box as they needed . just goes to show that so called @@conservatives## are just @@communists## in different clothing .
this drawing is stupid . even the second one is 'to each according to his needs ' . each one got as much box as they needed . just goes to show that so called @@conservatives## are just @@communists## in different clothing .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "drawing", "is", "stupid", ".", "even", "the", "second", "one", "is", "'to", "each", "according", "to", "his", "needs", "'", ".", "each", "one", "got", "as", "much", "box", "as", "they", "needed", ".", "just", "goes", "to", "show", "that", "so", "called", "conservatives", "are", "just", "communists", "in", "different", "clothing", "." ]
the only thing surprising is the number of statists who still believe in this fraud , and who still believe the government gives a shit about them . if the government just had more power and more money they would fix everything !
c3rzwrx
Libertarian
2,012
the only thing surprising is the number of @@statists## who still believe in this fraud , and who still believe the government gives a shit about them . if the government just had more power and more money they would fix everything !
the only thing surprising is the number of statists who still believe in this fraud , and who still believe the government gives a shit about them . if the government just had more power and more money they would fix everything !
the only thing surprising is the number of @@statists## who still believe in this fraud , and who still believe the government gives a shit about them . if the government just had more power and more money they would fix everything !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "only", "thing", "surprising", "is", "the", "number", "of", "statists", "who", "still", "believe", "in", "this", "fraud", ",", "and", "who", "still", "believe", "the", "government", "gives", "a", "shit", "about", "them", ".", "if", "the", "government", "just", "had", "more", "power", "and", "more", "money", "they", "would", "fix", "everything", "!" ]
shootings are extremely common in the philippines . i lived there for two years and nearly witnessed one killing only missed it by a few minutes , saw a body rotting in a field , and had several friends who witnessed mob killings and such . i personally know two people who openly talked about having killed somebody without any real expectation of being arrested . barangay local neighborhood officials are not particularly motivated to catch killers due to the danger involved . bear in mind that even 3.5x the number of u.s. murders by recent statistics does n't make the philippines some sort of anarchic wasteland or anything it 's mostly corruption , entrenched criminal organizations and a lack of organization that lets a lot of murders go unsolved . and i ca n't say that i ever saw a firearm while in the country aside from the many , many enormous shotguns that security guards carry at every business . i heard about more killings by bolo machete than firearm , but that 's just my anecdotal experience .
c7kx3vf
Libertarian
2,012
shootings are extremely common in the philippines . i lived there for two years and nearly witnessed one killing only missed it by a few minutes , saw a body rotting in a field , and had several friends who witnessed mob killings and such . i personally know two people who openly talked about having killed somebody without any real expectation of being arrested . @@barangay local neighborhood officials## are not particularly motivated to catch @@killers## due to the danger involved . bear in mind that even 3.5x the number of u.s. murders by recent statistics does n't make the philippines some sort of anarchic wasteland or anything it 's mostly corruption , entrenched criminal organizations and a lack of organization that lets a lot of murders go unsolved . and i ca n't say that i ever saw a firearm while in the country aside from the many , many enormous shotguns that @@security guards## carry at every business . i heard about more killings by bolo machete than firearm , but that 's just my anecdotal experience .
shootings are extremely common in the philippines . i lived there for two years and nearly witnessed one killing only missed it by a few minutes , saw a body rotting in a field , and had several @@friends## who witnessed mob killings and such . i personally know two people who openly talked about having killed somebody without any real expectation of being arrested . @@barangay local neighborhood officials## are not particularly motivated to catch killers due to the danger involved . bear in mind that even 3.5x the number of u.s. murders by recent statistics does n't make the philippines some sort of anarchic wasteland or anything it 's mostly corruption , @@entrenched criminal organizations## and a lack of organization that lets a lot of murders go unsolved . and i ca n't say that i ever saw a firearm while in the country aside from the many , many enormous shotguns that @@security guards carry## at every business . i heard about more killings by bolo machete than firearm , but that 's just my anecdotal experience .
shootings are extremely common in the philippines . i lived there for two years and nearly witnessed one killing only missed it by a few minutes , saw a body rotting in a field , and had several @@friends## who witnessed mob killings and such . i personally know two people who openly talked about having killed somebody without any real expectation of being arrested . @@barangay local neighborhood officials## are not particularly motivated to catch @@killers## due to the danger involved . bear in mind that even 3.5x the number of u.s. murders by recent statistics does n't make the philippines some sort of anarchic wasteland or anything it 's mostly corruption , @@entrenched criminal organizations## and a lack of organization that lets a lot of murders go unsolved . and i ca n't say that i ever saw a firearm while in the country aside from the many , many enormous shotguns that @@security guards## carry at every business . i heard about more killings by bolo machete than firearm , but that 's just my anecdotal experience .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "shootings", "are", "extremely", "common", "in", "the", "philippines", ".", "i", "lived", "there", "for", "two", "years", "and", "nearly", "witnessed", "one", "killing", "only", "missed", "it", "by", "a", "few", "minutes", ",", "saw", "a", "body", "rotting", "in", "a", "field", ",", "and", "had", "several", "friends", "who", "witnessed", "mob", "killings", "and", "such", ".", "i", "personally", "know", "two", "people", "who", "openly", "talked", "about", "having", "killed", "somebody", "without", "any", "real", "expectation", "of", "being", "arrested", ".", "barangay", "local", "neighborhood", "officials", "are", "not", "particularly", "motivated", "to", "catch", "killers", "due", "to", "the", "danger", "involved", ".", "bear", "in", "mind", "that", "even", "3.5x", "the", "number", "of", "u.s.", "murders", "by", "recent", "statistics", "does", "n't", "make", "the", "philippines", "some", "sort", "of", "anarchic", "wasteland", "or", "anything", "it", "'s", "mostly", "corruption", ",", "entrenched", "criminal", "organizations", "and", "a", "lack", "of", "organization", "that", "lets", "a", "lot", "of", "murders", "go", "unsolved", ".", "and", "i", "ca", "n't", "say", "that", "i", "ever", "saw", "a", "firearm", "while", "in", "the", "country", "aside", "from", "the", "many", ",", "many", "enormous", "shotguns", "that", "security", "guards", "carry", "at", "every", "business", ".", "i", "heard", "about", "more", "killings", "by", "bolo", "machete", "than", "firearm", ",", "but", "that", "'s", "just", "my", "anecdotal", "experience", "." ]
most of this predictions did not have hard dates to them further if i predict that i am going to go to work tommorow at 7am , then i get sick tonight because i eat some bad fish , i was not wrong '' in my prediction , rather unrelated facts changed thus my prediction would have to change with it only morons do not change their positions in fact of new facts as far as krugman goes , he is not fit to lick the dirt off peters shoes . do you really want to post links to everything krugman has been wrong about , i dont think reddit has that much space on the harddrives
c59gtyl
Libertarian
2,012
most of this predictions did not have hard dates to them further if i predict that i am going to go to work tommorow at 7am , then i get sick tonight because i eat some bad fish , i was not wrong '' in my prediction , rather unrelated facts changed thus my prediction would have to change with it only morons do not change their positions in fact of new facts as far as krugman goes , he is not fit to lick the dirt off peters shoes . do you really want to post links to everything krugman has been wrong about , i dont think reddit has that much space on the harddrives
most of this predictions did not have hard dates to them further if i predict that i am going to go to work tommorow at 7am , then i get sick tonight because i eat some bad fish , i was not wrong '' in my prediction , rather unrelated facts changed thus my prediction would have to change with it only morons do not change their positions in fact of new facts as far as krugman goes , he is not fit to lick the dirt off peters shoes . do you really want to post links to everything krugman has been wrong about , i dont think reddit has that much space on the harddrives
most of this predictions did not have hard dates to them further if i predict that i am going to go to work tommorow at 7am , then i get sick tonight because i eat some bad fish , i was not wrong '' in my prediction , rather unrelated facts changed thus my prediction would have to change with it only morons do not change their positions in fact of new facts as far as krugman goes , he is not fit to lick the dirt off peters shoes . do you really want to post links to everything krugman has been wrong about , i dont think reddit has that much space on the harddrives
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "most", "of", "this", "predictions", "did", "not", "have", "hard", "dates", "to", "them", "further", "if", "i", "predict", "that", "i", "am", "going", "to", "go", "to", "work", "tommorow", "at", "7am", ",", "then", "i", "get", "sick", "tonight", "because", "i", "eat", "some", "bad", "fish", ",", "i", "was", "not", "wrong", "``", "in", "my", "prediction", ",", "rather", "unrelated", "facts", "changed", "thus", "my", "prediction", "would", "have", "to", "change", "with", "it", "only", "morons", "do", "not", "change", "their", "positions", "in", "fact", "of", "new", "facts", "as", "far", "as", "krugman", "goes", ",", "he", "is", "not", "fit", "to", "lick", "the", "dirt", "off", "peters", "shoes", ".", "do", "you", "really", "want", "to", "post", "links", "to", "everything", "krugman", "has", "been", "wrong", "about", ",", "i", "dont", "think", "reddit", "has", "that", "much", "space", "on", "the", "harddrives" ]
they shot him in less than a minute . it seems to me like you can arrest someone a lot better without screaming that you 're going to kill them .
c7ip76p
Libertarian
2,012
they shot him in less than a minute . it seems to me like you can arrest someone a lot better without screaming that you 're going to kill them .
they shot him in less than a minute . it seems to me like you can arrest someone a lot better without screaming that you 're going to kill them .
they shot him in less than a minute . it seems to me like you can arrest someone a lot better without screaming that you 're going to kill them .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "they", "shot", "him", "in", "less", "than", "a", "minute", ".", "it", "seems", "to", "me", "like", "you", "can", "arrest", "someone", "a", "lot", "better", "without", "screaming", "that", "you", "'re", "going", "to", "kill", "them", "." ]
a starving man would be willing to give almost everything he has for food . to require a starving man to give everything he has for food is exploitation .
c6ywd1n
Libertarian
2,012
a starving man would be willing to give almost everything he has for food . to require a starving man to give everything he has for food is exploitation .
a starving man would be willing to give almost everything he has for food . to require a starving man to give everything he has for food is exploitation .
a starving man would be willing to give almost everything he has for food . to require a starving man to give everything he has for food is exploitation .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "a", "starving", "man", "would", "be", "willing", "to", "give", "almost", "everything", "he", "has", "for", "food", ".", "to", "require", "a", "starving", "man", "to", "give", "everything", "he", "has", "for", "food", "is", "exploitation", "." ]
the problem is that nobody disputes the fact that martin was shot and killed by zimmerman . he commuted a crime , and should have been arrested . it is not the job of the police to determine guilt . that is the job of the courts .
c45izzm
Libertarian
2,012
the problem is that nobody disputes the fact that martin was shot and killed by zimmerman . he commuted a crime , and should have been arrested . it is not the job of the @@police## to determine guilt . that is the job of the @@courts## .
the problem is that nobody disputes the fact that martin was shot and killed by zimmerman . he commuted a crime , and should have been arrested . it is not the job of the @@police## to determine guilt . that is the job of the @@courts## .
the problem is that nobody disputes the fact that martin was shot and killed by zimmerman . he commuted a crime , and should have been arrested . it is not the job of the @@police## to determine guilt . that is the job of the @@courts## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "the", "problem", "is", "that", "nobody", "disputes", "the", "fact", "that", "martin", "was", "shot", "and", "killed", "by", "zimmerman", ".", "he", "commuted", "a", "crime", ",", "and", "should", "have", "been", "arrested", ".", "it", "is", "not", "the", "job", "of", "the", "police", "to", "determine", "guilt", ".", "that", "is", "the", "job", "of", "the", "courts", "." ]
speaking of biased sources , this comes from the southern poverty law center , a pretty well known left wing organization that classified the men 's rights section of reddit as a hate group . pot , meet kettle .
c5g27rf
Libertarian
2,012
speaking of biased sources , this comes from the southern poverty law center , a pretty well known left wing organization that classified the @@men 's rights section of reddit## as a hate group . pot , meet kettle .
speaking of biased sources , this comes from the @@southern poverty law center## , a pretty well known @@left wing organization## that classified the @@men 's rights section of reddit## as a @@hate group## . pot , meet kettle .
speaking of biased sources , this comes from the @@southern poverty law center## , a pretty well known @@left wing organization## that classified the @@men 's rights section of reddit## as a @@hate group## . pot , meet kettle .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "speaking", "of", "biased", "sources", ",", "this", "comes", "from", "the", "southern", "poverty", "law", "center", ",", "a", "pretty", "well", "known", "left", "wing", "organization", "that", "classified", "the", "men", "'s", "rights", "section", "of", "reddit", "as", "a", "hate", "group", ".", "pot", ",", "meet", "kettle", "." ]
independent '' voters are n't what they say are . they are really blue or red people , who say that they are in the middle to appear open .
c6xrob8
Libertarian
2,012
@@independent '' voters## are n't what they say are . they are really @@blue or red people## , who say that they are in the middle to appear open .
@@independent '' voters## are n't what they say are . they are really blue or red people , who say that they are in the middle to appear open .
@@independent '' voters## are n't what they say are . they are really blue or red people , who say that they are in the middle to appear open .
[ "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "independent", "``", "voters", "are", "n't", "what", "they", "say", "are", ".", "they", "are", "really", "blue", "or", "red", "people", ",", "who", "say", "that", "they", "are", "in", "the", "middle", "to", "appear", "open", "." ]
i think we probably agree that the fed is stupid . issuing ecredits out of thin air is what we are doing now . not really . we are currently on the oil standard probably . but , i do n't think there is any evidence to that . if the us were to move to gold standard visa and am ex would continue to be a fiat currency that deals in billions of in points . public companies barter stock and land all the time .
c4iw4wj
Libertarian
2,012
i think we probably agree that @@the fed## is stupid . issuing ecredits out of thin air is what we are doing now . not really . we are currently on the oil standard probably . but , i do n't think there is any evidence to that . if the us were to move to gold standard visa and am ex would continue to be a fiat currency that deals in billions of in points . public companies barter stock and land all the time .
i think we probably agree that @@the fed## is stupid . issuing ecredits out of thin air is what we are doing now . not really . we are currently on the oil standard probably . but , i do n't think there is any evidence to that . if the us were to move to gold standard visa and am ex would continue to be a fiat currency that deals in billions of in points . @@public companies## barter stock and land all the time .
i think we probably agree that @@the fed## is stupid . issuing ecredits out of thin air is what we are doing now . not really . we are currently on the oil standard probably . but , i do n't think there is any evidence to that . if the us were to move to gold standard visa and am ex would continue to be a fiat currency that deals in billions of in points . public companies barter stock and land all the time .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "think", "we", "probably", "agree", "that", "the", "fed", "is", "stupid", ".", "issuing", "ecredits", "out", "of", "thin", "air", "is", "what", "we", "are", "doing", "now", ".", "not", "really", ".", "we", "are", "currently", "on", "the", "oil", "standard", "probably", ".", "but", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "there", "is", "any", "evidence", "to", "that", ".", "if", "the", "us", "were", "to", "move", "to", "gold", "standard", "visa", "and", "am", "ex", "would", "continue", "to", "be", "a", "fiat", "currency", "that", "deals", "in", "billions", "of", "in", "points", ".", "public", "companies", "barter", "stock", "and", "land", "all", "the", "time", "." ]
please see this post URL . sorry , i 've gotten three very similar replies .
c5j7dc4
Libertarian
2,012
please see this post URL . sorry , i 've gotten three very similar replies .
please see this post URL . sorry , i 've gotten three very similar replies .
please see this post URL . sorry , i 've gotten three very similar replies .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "please", "see", "this", "post", "URL", ".", "sorry", ",", "i", "'ve", "gotten", "three", "very", "similar", "replies", "." ]
the trend that i 've noticed is one away from pure capitalism and pure communism and toward a socialistcapitalist hybrid .
c3mjn25
Libertarian
2,012
the trend that i 've noticed is one away from pure capitalism and pure communism and toward a socialistcapitalist hybrid .
the trend that i 've noticed is one away from pure capitalism and pure communism and toward a socialistcapitalist hybrid .
the trend that i 've noticed is one away from pure capitalism and pure communism and toward a socialistcapitalist hybrid .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "trend", "that", "i", "'ve", "noticed", "is", "one", "away", "from", "pure", "capitalism", "and", "pure", "communism", "and", "toward", "a", "socialistcapitalist", "hybrid", "." ]
what did i say that was incorrect ? that not many schools had zero tolerance 6 years ago ? it 's obviously regional , but that 's the case in my area . not considering those federally mandated .
cacricu
Libertarian
2,013
what did i say that was incorrect ? that not many schools had zero tolerance 6 years ago ? it 's obviously regional , but that 's the case in my area . not considering those federally mandated .
what did i say that was incorrect ? that not many @@schools## had zero tolerance 6 years ago ? it 's obviously regional , but that 's the case in my area . not considering those federally mandated .
what did i say that was incorrect ? that not many @@schools## had zero tolerance 6 years ago ? it 's obviously regional , but that 's the case in my area . not considering those federally mandated .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "did", "i", "say", "that", "was", "incorrect", "?", "that", "not", "many", "schools", "had", "zero", "tolerance", "6", "years", "ago", "?", "it", "'s", "obviously", "regional", ",", "but", "that", "'s", "the", "case", "in", "my", "area", ".", "not", "considering", "those", "federally", "mandated", "." ]
in an embarrassingly cringey post you really knocked the embarrassment level out of the park by signing it .
caksccn
Libertarian
2,013
in an embarrassingly cringey post you really knocked the embarrassment level out of the park by signing it .
in an embarrassingly cringey post you really knocked the embarrassment level out of the park by signing it .
in an embarrassingly cringey post you really knocked the embarrassment level out of the park by signing it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "in", "an", "embarrassingly", "cringey", "post", "you", "really", "knocked", "the", "embarrassment", "level", "out", "of", "the", "park", "by", "signing", "it", "." ]
right , like nobody wants to buy shell oil from nigeria delta ? or bp oil after the spill ? companies buying the oil from stan will engage in a seperate contract with him , agreeing on a different arbitrator and the people from the area stan is polluting are not his customers .
caa3qh3
Libertarian
2,013
right , like nobody wants to buy shell oil from nigeria delta ? or bp oil after the spill ? companies buying the oil from stan will engage in a seperate contract with him , agreeing on a different arbitrator and the people from the area stan is polluting are not his customers .
right , like nobody wants to buy shell oil from nigeria delta ? or bp oil after the spill ? companies buying the oil from stan will engage in a seperate contract with him , agreeing on a different arbitrator and the @@people from the area stan is polluting## are not his customers .
right , like nobody wants to buy shell oil from nigeria delta ? or bp oil after the spill ? companies buying the oil from stan will engage in a seperate contract with him , agreeing on a different arbitrator and the @@people from the area stan is polluting## are not his customers .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "right", ",", "like", "nobody", "wants", "to", "buy", "shell", "oil", "from", "nigeria", "delta", "?", "or", "bp", "oil", "after", "the", "spill", "?", "companies", "buying", "the", "oil", "from", "stan", "will", "engage", "in", "a", "seperate", "contract", "with", "him", ",", "agreeing", "on", "a", "different", "arbitrator", "and", "the", "people", "from", "the", "area", "stan", "is", "polluting", "are", "not", "his", "customers", "." ]
i hope your not acting as an apologist or , even worse , defending bin laden and his fascistic goons ?
cberzan
Libertarian
2,013
i hope your not acting as an apologist or , even worse , defending bin laden and his @@fascistic goons## ?
i hope your not acting as an apologist or , even worse , defending bin laden and his @@fascistic goons## ?
i hope your not acting as an apologist or , even worse , defending bin laden and his @@fascistic goons## ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0 ]
[ "i", "hope", "your", "not", "acting", "as", "an", "apologist", "or", ",", "even", "worse", ",", "defending", "bin", "laden", "and", "his", "fascistic", "goons", "?" ]
whoosh i do n't think it 's a great analogy though . one of the reasons for embassies is national security . there is general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for the sake of national security . there is not general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for profit .
c9ykzwy
Libertarian
2,013
whoosh i do n't think it 's a great analogy though . one of the reasons for embassies is national security . there is general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for the sake of national security . there is not general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for profit .
whoosh i do n't think it 's a great analogy though . one of the reasons for @@embassies## is national security . there is general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for the sake of national security . there is not general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for profit .
whoosh i do n't think it 's a great analogy though . one of the reasons for embassies is national security . there is general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for the sake of national security . there is not general agreement that it 's ok to risk lives for profit .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "whoosh", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "it", "'s", "a", "great", "analogy", "though", ".", "one", "of", "the", "reasons", "for", "embassies", "is", "national", "security", ".", "there", "is", "general", "agreement", "that", "it", "'s", "ok", "to", "risk", "lives", "for", "the", "sake", "of", "national", "security", ".", "there", "is", "not", "general", "agreement", "that", "it", "'s", "ok", "to", "risk", "lives", "for", "profit", "." ]
a foreign policy of nonintervention falls within the bounds of the us constitution . there 's no need to abolish the government to return to that principal . the fact of the matter is that even returning to constitutional principals at this point would shock '' many american citizens . there 's no way around that .
cahdzjl
Libertarian
2,013
a foreign policy of nonintervention falls within the bounds of the us constitution . there 's no need to abolish the government to return to that principal . the fact of the matter is that even returning to constitutional principals at this point would shock '' many @@american citizens## . there 's no way around that .
a foreign policy of nonintervention falls within the bounds of the us constitution . there 's no need to abolish the government to return to that principal . the fact of the matter is that even returning to constitutional principals at this point would shock '' many @@american citizens## . there 's no way around that .
a foreign policy of nonintervention falls within the bounds of the us constitution . there 's no need to abolish the government to return to that principal . the fact of the matter is that even returning to constitutional principals at this point would shock '' many @@american citizens## . there 's no way around that .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "a", "foreign", "policy", "of", "nonintervention", "falls", "within", "the", "bounds", "of", "the", "us", "constitution", ".", "there", "'s", "no", "need", "to", "abolish", "the", "government", "to", "return", "to", "that", "principal", ".", "the", "fact", "of", "the", "matter", "is", "that", "even", "returning", "to", "constitutional", "principals", "at", "this", "point", "would", "shock", "``", "many", "american", "citizens", ".", "there", "'s", "no", "way", "around", "that", "." ]
when they are low is a poor time to pay them back no it makes so much sense to wait until they go way up . s if people did not want to lend us money rates would have to go up . do you have any comprehension of how qe functions ?
cd4fkq8
Libertarian
2,013
when they are low is a poor time to pay them back no it makes so much sense to wait until they go way up . s if people did not want to lend us money rates would have to go up . do you have any comprehension of how qe functions ?
when they are low is a poor time to pay them back no it makes so much sense to wait until they go way up . s if people did not want to lend us money rates would have to go up . do you have any comprehension of how qe functions ?
when they are low is a poor time to pay them back no it makes so much sense to wait until they go way up . s if people did not want to lend us money rates would have to go up . do you have any comprehension of how qe functions ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "when", "they", "are", "low", "is", "a", "poor", "time", "to", "pay", "them", "back", "no", "it", "makes", "so", "much", "sense", "to", "wait", "until", "they", "go", "way", "up", ".", "s", "if", "people", "did", "not", "want", "to", "lend", "us", "money", "rates", "would", "have", "to", "go", "up", ".", "do", "you", "have", "any", "comprehension", "of", "how", "qe", "functions", "?" ]
that 's not utilizing it . and if the boss also works in the factory , so do the factory workers why does the boss get a special snow flake award in the form of ownership and complete totalitarian control of the work space which most people spend an average of 6 to 8 hours a day in yup , i used to believe that marx 's theory of surplus value was a real problem . but the thing is , laborwork is not all that goes into a product and manufacturing . there is management , supervising , research and all that . now , does management , ideally , deserve all that money ? no . that is a downside to capitalism . but not even that significant , so , they get a lot more money , the workers all pay into that with their surplus value . but , in relation , it may seem like the boss is taking a shit ton of money away from the workers , but collectively , it does not amount to that much per person . so , where does all that extra money go ? to develop more capital within the business , such as research , buying more property or hiring more contractors or builders stuff like that . a very small portion results in waste in the capitalist 's bank accounts under minimally regulated capitalism . the argument is that the capitalist invested the initial capital into it . but this is n't true if it was inherited well , technically , with the inherited part , it is true . inheriting is a big part of human society . children usually get what their parents leave behind . does that mean they were the initial ones to develop or buy it ? no . but it is rightfully theirs as is everything a middle class family passes down through the generations . if the person who inherited the property has any part of a brain , they will put that property to good use to obtain more capital rather than let it sit . plus , inherited wealth is no where near the majority of wealth people 's wealth in the united states . i remember this from when i was arguing for socialism , back when i was a socialist , a libertarian proved that to me . it was started with a bank loan this comes with an inherent risk . if you 're starting something up and you take a loan , if you succeed , then you get capital , the bank gets capital . if you fail , the bank takes whatever capital you owe them and leaves you with the rest . so , this is just another way capitalists take risks , so whatever is missing in initial investment , is made up in risks . also let 's say this capitalist built the factory from the ground up with no help how often does that happen reaally ? no , they get help , they are often business partners and banks , and they get payed their share respectively . not to mention initial employees . say she initially invested 20,000 into the business and get 's ownership privileges for starting and investing into the business . alrighty , seems like a risk taker once she has acquired over 20,000 in profits off of her workers surplus why should she continue being sole proprietor ? well , because why should she take the risk of starting up a business with a new idea in hopes of succeeding if she does not reap the profits ? i already addressed the surplus value up there . business owners ' income does not count for anywhere near a fraction of what the surplus value goes to . there are other expenses to be taken care of , electricity , contracting , supervising , maintenance and all that . let 's take ford motor company , appropriate as i live near detroit . ceo recieved 2 million dollars in pay and 3.95 million in bonuses . 5.95 million . okay , ford has 164,000 employees . 5.95 mil 164,000 . that is 36 dollars per person . oh how greedy the boss is taking 36 dollars per employee per year ? this is why i no longer buy into the theory of surplus value . you work for a company , the company takes a voluntary tax voluntary because you can quit to expand the company to new horizons . from there on the continuance of the business is completely a collective effort and should therefore be collectively owned . well , yes , i am a market socialist . some of us want to subsidize cooperatives , i believe they would prevail under the market like in spain with some education and startups . but i do n't think people should be forced to give their business to the collective .
cafjzo0
Libertarian
2,013
that 's not utilizing it . and if the boss also works in the factory , so do the @@factory workers## why does the boss get a special snow flake award in the form of ownership and complete totalitarian control of the work space which most people spend an average of 6 to 8 hours a day in yup , i used to believe that marx 's theory of surplus value was a real problem . but the thing is , laborwork is not all that goes into a product and manufacturing . there is management , supervising , research and all that . now , does management , ideally , deserve all that money ? no . that is a downside to capitalism . but not even that significant , so , they get a lot more money , the @@workers## all pay into that with their surplus value . but , in relation , it may seem like the boss is taking a shit ton of money away from the @@workers## , but collectively , it does not amount to that much per person . so , where does all that extra money go ? to develop more capital within the business , such as research , buying more property or hiring more @@contractors## or @@builders## stuff like that . a very small portion results in waste in the capitalist 's bank accounts under minimally regulated capitalism . the argument is that the capitalist invested the initial capital into it . but this is n't true if it was inherited well , technically , with the inherited part , it is true . inheriting is a big part of human society . @@children## usually get what their @@parents## leave behind . does that mean they were the initial ones to develop or buy it ? no . but it is rightfully theirs as is everything a middle class family passes down through the generations . if the person who inherited the property has any part of a brain , they will put that property to good use to obtain more capital rather than let it sit . plus , inherited wealth is no where near the majority of @@wealth people## 's wealth in the united states . i remember this from when i was arguing for socialism , back when i was a socialist , a libertarian proved that to me . it was started with a bank loan this comes with an inherent risk . if you 're starting something up and you take a loan , if you succeed , then you get capital , the bank gets capital . if you fail , the bank takes whatever capital you owe them and leaves you with the rest . so , this is just another way @@capitalists## take risks , so whatever is missing in initial investment , is made up in risks . also let 's say this capitalist built the factory from the ground up with no help how often does that happen reaally ? no , they get help , they are often business partners and banks , and they get payed their share respectively . not to mention @@initial employees## . say she initially invested 20,000 into the business and get 's ownership privileges for starting and investing into the business . alrighty , seems like a risk taker once she has acquired over 20,000 in profits off of her @@workers## surplus why should she continue being sole proprietor ? well , because why should she take the risk of starting up a business with a new idea in hopes of succeeding if she does not reap the profits ? i already addressed the surplus value up there . @@business owners## ' income does not count for anywhere near a fraction of what the surplus value goes to . there are other expenses to be taken care of , electricity , contracting , supervising , maintenance and all that . let 's take ford motor company , appropriate as i live near detroit . ceo recieved 2 million dollars in pay and 3.95 million in bonuses . 5.95 million . okay , ford has 164,000 @@employees## . 5.95 mil 164,000 . that is 36 dollars per person . oh how greedy the boss is taking 36 dollars per employee per year ? this is why i no longer buy into the theory of surplus value . you work for a company , the company takes a voluntary tax voluntary because you can quit to expand the company to new horizons . from there on the continuance of the business is completely a collective effort and should therefore be collectively owned . well , yes , i am a market socialist . some of us want to subsidize cooperatives , i believe they would prevail under the market like in spain with some education and startups . but i do n't think people should be forced to give their business to the collective .
that 's not utilizing it . and if the boss also works in the factory , so do the @@factory workers## why does the boss get a special snow flake award in the form of ownership and complete totalitarian control of the work space which most people spend an average of 6 to 8 hours a day in yup , i used to believe that marx 's theory of surplus value was a real problem . but the thing is , laborwork is not all that goes into a product and manufacturing . there is management , supervising , research and all that . now , does @@management## , ideally , deserve all that money ? no . that is a downside to capitalism . but not even that significant , so , they get a lot more money , the @@workers## all pay into that with their surplus value . but , in relation , it may seem like the boss is taking a shit ton of money away from the @@workers## , but collectively , it does not amount to that much per person . so , where does all that extra money go ? to develop more capital within the business , such as research , buying more property or hiring more @@contractors## or @@builders## stuff like that . a very small portion results in waste in the capitalist 's bank accounts under minimally regulated capitalism . the argument is that the capitalist invested the initial capital into it . but this is n't true if it was inherited well , technically , with the inherited part , it is true . inheriting is a big part of human society . @@children## usually get what their @@parents## leave behind . does that mean they were the initial ones to develop or buy it ? no . but it is rightfully theirs as is everything a @@middle class family## passes down through the generations . if the person who inherited the property has any part of a brain , they will put that property to good use to obtain more capital rather than let it sit . plus , inherited wealth is no where near the majority of wealth people 's wealth in the united states . i remember this from when i was arguing for socialism , back when i was a socialist , a libertarian proved that to me . it was started with a bank loan this comes with an inherent risk . if you 're starting something up and you take a loan , if you succeed , then you get capital , the bank gets capital . if you fail , the bank takes whatever capital you owe them and leaves you with the rest . so , this is just another way @@capitalists## take risks , so whatever is missing in initial investment , is made up in risks . also let 's say this capitalist built the factory from the ground up with no help how often does that happen reaally ? no , they get help , they are often @@business partners## and @@banks## , and they get payed their share respectively . not to mention @@initial employees## . say she initially invested 20,000 into the business and get 's ownership privileges for starting and investing into the business . alrighty , seems like a risk taker once she has acquired over 20,000 in profits off of her workers surplus why should she continue being sole proprietor ? well , because why should she take the risk of starting up a business with a new idea in hopes of succeeding if she does not reap the profits ? i already addressed the surplus value up there . @@business owners## ' income does not count for anywhere near a fraction of what the surplus value goes to . there are other expenses to be taken care of , electricity , contracting , supervising , maintenance and all that . let 's take ford motor company , appropriate as i live near detroit . ceo recieved 2 million dollars in pay and 3.95 million in bonuses . 5.95 million . okay , ford has 164,000 @@employees## . 5.95 mil 164,000 . that is 36 dollars per person . oh how greedy the boss is taking 36 dollars per employee per year ? this is why i no longer buy into the theory of surplus value . you work for a company , the company takes a voluntary tax voluntary because you can quit to expand the company to new horizons . from there on the continuance of the business is completely a collective effort and should therefore be collectively owned . well , yes , i am a market socialist . some of us want to subsidize @@cooperatives## , i believe they would prevail under the market like in spain with some education and startups . but i do n't think people should be forced to give their business to the collective .
that 's not utilizing it . and if the boss also works in the factory , so do the @@factory workers## why does the boss get a special snow flake award in the form of ownership and complete totalitarian control of the work space which most people spend an average of 6 to 8 hours a day in yup , i used to believe that marx 's theory of surplus value was a real problem . but the thing is , laborwork is not all that goes into a product and manufacturing . there is management , supervising , research and all that . now , does @@management## , ideally , deserve all that money ? no . that is a downside to capitalism . but not even that significant , so , they get a lot more money , the @@workers## all pay into that with their surplus value . but , in relation , it may seem like the boss is taking a shit ton of money away from the @@workers## , but collectively , it does not amount to that much per person . so , where does all that extra money go ? to develop more capital within the business , such as research , buying more property or hiring more @@contractors## or @@builders## stuff like that . a very small portion results in waste in the capitalist 's bank accounts under minimally regulated capitalism . the argument is that the capitalist invested the initial capital into it . but this is n't true if it was inherited well , technically , with the inherited part , it is true . inheriting is a big part of human society . @@children## usually get what their @@parents## leave behind . does that mean they were the initial ones to develop or buy it ? no . but it is rightfully theirs as is everything a @@middle class family## passes down through the generations . if the person who inherited the property has any part of a brain , they will put that property to good use to obtain more capital rather than let it sit . plus , inherited wealth is no where near the majority of wealth people 's wealth in the united states . i remember this from when i was arguing for socialism , back when i was a socialist , a libertarian proved that to me . it was started with a bank loan this comes with an inherent risk . if you 're starting something up and you take a loan , if you succeed , then you get capital , the bank gets capital . if you fail , the bank takes whatever capital you owe them and leaves you with the rest . so , this is just another way @@capitalists## take risks , so whatever is missing in initial investment , is made up in risks . also let 's say this capitalist built the factory from the ground up with no help how often does that happen reaally ? no , they get help , they are often @@business partners## and @@banks## , and they get payed their share respectively . not to mention @@initial employees## . say she initially invested 20,000 into the business and get 's ownership privileges for starting and investing into the business . alrighty , seems like a risk taker once she has acquired over 20,000 in profits off of her workers surplus why should she continue being sole proprietor ? well , because why should she take the risk of starting up a business with a new idea in hopes of succeeding if she does not reap the profits ? i already addressed the surplus value up there . @@business owners## ' income does not count for anywhere near a fraction of what the surplus value goes to . there are other expenses to be taken care of , electricity , contracting , supervising , maintenance and all that . let 's take ford motor company , appropriate as i live near detroit . ceo recieved 2 million dollars in pay and 3.95 million in bonuses . 5.95 million . okay , ford has 164,000 @@employees## . 5.95 mil 164,000 . that is 36 dollars per person . oh how greedy the boss is taking 36 dollars per employee per year ? this is why i no longer buy into the theory of surplus value . you work for a company , the company takes a voluntary tax voluntary because you can quit to expand the company to new horizons . from there on the continuance of the business is completely a collective effort and should therefore be collectively owned . well , yes , i am a market socialist . some of us want to subsidize @@cooperatives## , i believe they would prevail under the market like in spain with some education and startups . but i do n't think people should be forced to give their business to the collective .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "'s", "not", "utilizing", "it", ".", "and", "if", "the", "boss", "also", "works", "in", "the", "factory", ",", "so", "do", "the", "factory", "workers", "why", "does", "the", "boss", "get", "a", "special", "snow", "flake", "award", "in", "the", "form", "of", "ownership", "and", "complete", "totalitarian", "control", "of", "the", "work", "space", "which", "most", "people", "spend", "an", "average", "of", "6", "to", "8", "hours", "a", "day", "in", "yup", ",", "i", "used", "to", "believe", "that", "marx", "'s", "theory", "of", "surplus", "value", "was", "a", "real", "problem", ".", "but", "the", "thing", "is", ",", "laborwork", "is", "not", "all", "that", "goes", "into", "a", "product", "and", "manufacturing", ".", "there", "is", "management", ",", "supervising", ",", "research", "and", "all", "that", ".", "now", ",", "does", "management", ",", "ideally", ",", "deserve", "all", "that", "money", "?", "no", ".", "that", "is", "a", "downside", "to", "capitalism", ".", "but", "not", "even", "that", "significant", ",", "so", ",", "they", "get", "a", "lot", "more", "money", ",", "the", "workers", "all", "pay", "into", "that", "with", "their", "surplus", "value", ".", "but", ",", "in", "relation", ",", "it", "may", "seem", "like", "the", "boss", "is", "taking", "a", "shit", "ton", "of", "money", "away", "from", "the", "workers", ",", "but", "collectively", ",", "it", "does", "not", "amount", "to", "that", "much", "per", "person", ".", "so", ",", "where", "does", "all", "that", "extra", "money", "go", "?", "to", "develop", "more", "capital", "within", "the", "business", ",", "such", "as", "research", ",", "buying", "more", "property", "or", "hiring", "more", "contractors", "or", "builders", "stuff", "like", "that", ".", "a", "very", "small", "portion", "results", "in", "waste", "in", "the", "capitalist", "'s", "bank", "accounts", "under", "minimally", "regulated", "capitalism", ".", "the", "argument", "is", "that", "the", "capitalist", "invested", "the", "initial", "capital", "into", "it", ".", "but", "this", "is", "n't", "true", "if", "it", "was", "inherited", "well", ",", "technically", ",", "with", "the", "inherited", "part", ",", "it", "is", "true", ".", "inheriting", "is", "a", "big", "part", "of", "human", "society", ".", "children", "usually", "get", "what", "their", "parents", "leave", "behind", ".", "does", "that", "mean", "they", "were", "the", "initial", "ones", "to", "develop", "or", "buy", "it", "?", "no", ".", "but", "it", "is", "rightfully", "theirs", "as", "is", "everything", "a", "middle", "class", "family", "passes", "down", "through", "the", "generations", ".", "if", "the", "person", "who", "inherited", "the", "property", "has", "any", "part", "of", "a", "brain", ",", "they", "will", "put", "that", "property", "to", "good", "use", "to", "obtain", "more", "capital", "rather", "than", "let", "it", "sit", ".", "plus", ",", "inherited", "wealth", "is", "no", "where", "near", "the", "majority", "of", "wealth", "people", "'s", "wealth", "in", "the", "united", "states", ".", "i", "remember", "this", "from", "when", "i", "was", "arguing", "for", "socialism", ",", "back", "when", "i", "was", "a", "socialist", ",", "a", "libertarian", "proved", "that", "to", "me", ".", "it", "was", "started", "with", "a", "bank", "loan", "this", "comes", "with", "an", "inherent", "risk", ".", "if", "you", "'re", "starting", "something", "up", "and", "you", "take", "a", "loan", ",", "if", "you", "succeed", ",", "then", "you", "get", "capital", ",", "the", "bank", "gets", "capital", ".", "if", "you", "fail", ",", "the", "bank", "takes", "whatever", "capital", "you", "owe", "them", "and", "leaves", "you", "with", "the", "rest", ".", "so", ",", "this", "is", "just", "another", "way", "capitalists", "take", "risks", ",", "so", "whatever", "is", "missing", "in", "initial", "investment", ",", "is", "made", "up", "in", "risks", ".", "also", "let", "'s", "say", "this", "capitalist", "built", "the", "factory", "from", "the", "ground", "up", "with", "no", "help", "how", "often", "does", "that", "happen", "reaally", "?", "no", ",", "they", "get", "help", ",", "they", "are", "often", "business", "partners", "and", "banks", ",", "and", "they", "get", "payed", "their", "share", "respectively", ".", "not", "to", "mention", "initial", "employees", ".", "say", "she", "initially", "invested", "20,000", "into", "the", "business", "and", "get", "'s", "ownership", "privileges", "for", "starting", "and", "investing", "into", "the", "business", ".", "alrighty", ",", "seems", "like", "a", "risk", "taker", "once", "she", "has", "acquired", "over", "20,000", "in", "profits", "off", "of", "her", "workers", "surplus", "why", "should", "she", "continue", "being", "sole", "proprietor", "?", "well", ",", "because", "why", "should", "she", "take", "the", "risk", "of", "starting", "up", "a", "business", "with", "a", "new", "idea", "in", "hopes", "of", "succeeding", "if", "she", "does", "not", "reap", "the", "profits", "?", "i", "already", "addressed", "the", "surplus", "value", "up", "there", ".", "business", "owners", "'", "income", "does", "not", "count", "for", "anywhere", "near", "a", "fraction", "of", "what", "the", "surplus", "value", "goes", "to", ".", "there", "are", "other", "expenses", "to", "be", "taken", "care", "of", ",", "electricity", ",", "contracting", ",", "supervising", ",", "maintenance", "and", "all", "that", ".", "let", "'s", "take", "ford", "motor", "company", ",", "appropriate", "as", "i", "live", "near", "detroit", ".", "ceo", "recieved", "2", "million", "dollars", "in", "pay", "and", "3.95", "million", "in", "bonuses", ".", "5.95", "million", ".", "okay", ",", "ford", "has", "164,000", "employees", ".", "5.95", "mil", "164,000", ".", "that", "is", "36", "dollars", "per", "person", ".", "oh", "how", "greedy", "the", "boss", "is", "taking", "36", "dollars", "per", "employee", "per", "year", "?", "this", "is", "why", "i", "no", "longer", "buy", "into", "the", "theory", "of", "surplus", "value", ".", "you", "work", "for", "a", "company", ",", "the", "company", "takes", "a", "voluntary", "tax", "voluntary", "because", "you", "can", "quit", "to", "expand", "the", "company", "to", "new", "horizons", ".", "from", "there", "on", "the", "continuance", "of", "the", "business", "is", "completely", "a", "collective", "effort", "and", "should", "therefore", "be", "collectively", "owned", ".", "well", ",", "yes", ",", "i", "am", "a", "market", "socialist", ".", "some", "of", "us", "want", "to", "subsidize", "cooperatives", ",", "i", "believe", "they", "would", "prevail", "under", "the", "market", "like", "in", "spain", "with", "some", "education", "and", "startups", ".", "but", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "people", "should", "be", "forced", "to", "give", "their", "business", "to", "the", "collective", "." ]
dang , this guy is a truly top notch sociopath .
c7xldnu
Libertarian
2,013
dang , this guy is a truly top notch sociopath .
dang , this guy is a truly top notch sociopath .
dang , this guy is a truly top notch sociopath .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "dang", ",", "this", "guy", "is", "a", "truly", "top", "notch", "sociopath", "." ]
and so ? they use helicopters and airplanes as well .
cam6kze
Libertarian
2,013
and so ? they use helicopters and airplanes as well .
and so ? they use helicopters and airplanes as well .
and so ? they use helicopters and airplanes as well .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "so", "?", "they", "use", "helicopters", "and", "airplanes", "as", "well", "." ]
you can not police the ideological purity of a selfclaimed label .
c9dnwtr
Libertarian
2,013
you can not police the ideological purity of a selfclaimed label .
you can not police the ideological purity of a selfclaimed label .
you can not police the ideological purity of a selfclaimed label .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "can", "not", "police", "the", "ideological", "purity", "of", "a", "selfclaimed", "label", "." ]
i thought the exact same thing . i did n't know about this until a few years ago , when i was reading about variations of dmt . it seems like she 's trying to make a duplicate law , or possibly using public fearmongering to get support , so that she can push a new law through with whatever other bullshit or funding she wants tacked onto it .
cb69f41
Libertarian
2,013
i thought the exact same thing . i did n't know about this until a few years ago , when i was reading about variations of dmt . it seems like she 's trying to make a duplicate law , or possibly using public fearmongering to get support , so that she can push a new law through with whatever other bullshit or funding she wants tacked onto it .
i thought the exact same thing . i did n't know about this until a few years ago , when i was reading about variations of dmt . it seems like she 's trying to make a duplicate law , or possibly using public fearmongering to get support , so that she can push a new law through with whatever other bullshit or funding she wants tacked onto it .
i thought the exact same thing . i did n't know about this until a few years ago , when i was reading about variations of dmt . it seems like she 's trying to make a duplicate law , or possibly using public fearmongering to get support , so that she can push a new law through with whatever other bullshit or funding she wants tacked onto it .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "thought", "the", "exact", "same", "thing", ".", "i", "did", "n't", "know", "about", "this", "until", "a", "few", "years", "ago", ",", "when", "i", "was", "reading", "about", "variations", "of", "dmt", ".", "it", "seems", "like", "she", "'s", "trying", "to", "make", "a", "duplicate", "law", ",", "or", "possibly", "using", "public", "fearmongering", "to", "get", "support", ",", "so", "that", "she", "can", "push", "a", "new", "law", "through", "with", "whatever", "other", "bullshit", "or", "funding", "she", "wants", "tacked", "onto", "it", "." ]
i think this has been happening for quite awhile .
cc8n9ll
Libertarian
2,013
i think this has been happening for quite awhile .
i think this has been happening for quite awhile .
i think this has been happening for quite awhile .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "think", "this", "has", "been", "happening", "for", "quite", "awhile", "." ]
thanks for the clarification , your insight helped me understand the problems much better .
cd6bi10
Libertarian
2,013
thanks for the clarification , your insight helped me understand the problems much better .
thanks for the clarification , your insight helped me understand the problems much better .
thanks for the clarification , your insight helped me understand the problems much better .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "thanks", "for", "the", "clarification", ",", "your", "insight", "helped", "me", "understand", "the", "problems", "much", "better", "." ]
no you did n't rebut my argument because you did n't explain how such a group would be able to hold a city hostage without having access to weapons like nukes which are denied to individuals at its disposal . you did n't explain how a group would hold a city hostage with a nuke . secondly , rebutting my argument is n't the same as presenting your own argument . please explain how it is a serious response . you do this by actually defending the position . again , the question of whether it 's a serious response does not require a defense . only the question of whether it should not be taken as a serious response requires a defense . because that 's the argument you presented .
cd4bdi5
Libertarian
2,013
no you did n't rebut my argument because you did n't explain how such a group would be able to hold a city hostage without having access to weapons like nukes which are denied to individuals at its disposal . you did n't explain how a group would hold a city hostage with a nuke . secondly , rebutting my argument is n't the same as presenting your own argument . please explain how it is a serious response . you do this by actually defending the position . again , the question of whether it 's a serious response does not require a defense . only the question of whether it should not be taken as a serious response requires a defense . because that 's the argument you presented .
no you did n't rebut my argument because you did n't explain how such a group would be able to hold a city hostage without having access to weapons like nukes which are denied to individuals at its disposal . you did n't explain how a group would hold a city hostage with a nuke . secondly , rebutting my argument is n't the same as presenting your own argument . please explain how it is a serious response . you do this by actually defending the position . again , the question of whether it 's a serious response does not require a defense . only the question of whether it should not be taken as a serious response requires a defense . because that 's the argument you presented .
no you did n't rebut my argument because you did n't explain how such a group would be able to hold a city hostage without having access to weapons like nukes which are denied to individuals at its disposal . you did n't explain how a group would hold a city hostage with a nuke . secondly , rebutting my argument is n't the same as presenting your own argument . please explain how it is a serious response . you do this by actually defending the position . again , the question of whether it 's a serious response does not require a defense . only the question of whether it should not be taken as a serious response requires a defense . because that 's the argument you presented .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", "you", "did", "n't", "rebut", "my", "argument", "because", "you", "did", "n't", "explain", "how", "such", "a", "group", "would", "be", "able", "to", "hold", "a", "city", "hostage", "without", "having", "access", "to", "weapons", "like", "nukes", "which", "are", "denied", "to", "individuals", "at", "its", "disposal", ".", "you", "did", "n't", "explain", "how", "a", "group", "would", "hold", "a", "city", "hostage", "with", "a", "nuke", ".", "secondly", ",", "rebutting", "my", "argument", "is", "n't", "the", "same", "as", "presenting", "your", "own", "argument", ".", "please", "explain", "how", "it", "is", "a", "serious", "response", ".", "you", "do", "this", "by", "actually", "defending", "the", "position", ".", "again", ",", "the", "question", "of", "whether", "it", "'s", "a", "serious", "response", "does", "not", "require", "a", "defense", ".", "only", "the", "question", "of", "whether", "it", "should", "not", "be", "taken", "as", "a", "serious", "response", "requires", "a", "defense", ".", "because", "that", "'s", "the", "argument", "you", "presented", "." ]
i am very into this . i have discussed it a few times e.g . URL and URL i think we ought to focus on ourselves and our immediate circle of familyfriends . see also URL
ccx4uec
Libertarian
2,013
i am very into this . i have discussed it a few times e.g . URL and URL i think we ought to focus on ourselves and our immediate circle of familyfriends . see also URL
i am very into this . i have discussed it a few times e.g . URL and URL i think we ought to focus on ourselves and our immediate circle of familyfriends . see also URL
i am very into this . i have discussed it a few times e.g . URL and URL i think we ought to focus on ourselves and our immediate circle of familyfriends . see also URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "am", "very", "into", "this", ".", "i", "have", "discussed", "it", "a", "few", "times", "e.g", ".", "URL", "and", "URL", "i", "think", "we", "ought", "to", "focus", "on", "ourselves", "and", "our", "immediate", "circle", "of", "familyfriends", ".", "see", "also", "URL" ]
thats because they 're silly positivists . they believe that rights can only come from government , and rather than seeing that the government has been standing in the way of their rights to marry , they see that the new obama government has given them the right to marry now . and now they wish to be given more rights .
cassyq8
Libertarian
2,013
thats because they 're silly @@positivists## . they believe that rights can only come from government , and rather than seeing that the government has been standing in the way of their rights to marry , they see that @@the new obama government## has given them the right to marry now . and now they wish to be given more rights .
thats because they 're @@silly positivists## . they believe that rights can only come from government , and rather than seeing that the government has been standing in the way of their rights to marry , they see that the @@new obama government## has given them the right to marry now . and now they wish to be given more rights .
thats because they 're @@silly positivists## . they believe that rights can only come from government , and rather than seeing that the government has been standing in the way of their rights to marry , they see that the @@new obama government## has given them the right to marry now . and now they wish to be given more rights .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "thats", "because", "they", "'re", "silly", "positivists", ".", "they", "believe", "that", "rights", "can", "only", "come", "from", "government", ",", "and", "rather", "than", "seeing", "that", "the", "government", "has", "been", "standing", "in", "the", "way", "of", "their", "rights", "to", "marry", ",", "they", "see", "that", "the", "new", "obama", "government", "has", "given", "them", "the", "right", "to", "marry", "now", ".", "and", "now", "they", "wish", "to", "be", "given", "more", "rights", "." ]
obama says whatever to get by to the next thing . people still back this schmuck . this proves that people get the government they deserve .
cd9by5n
Libertarian
2,013
obama says whatever to get by to the next thing . people still back this schmuck . this proves that people get the government they deserve .
obama says whatever to get by to the next thing . people still back this schmuck . this proves that people get the government they deserve .
obama says whatever to get by to the next thing . people still back this schmuck . this proves that people get the government they deserve .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "obama", "says", "whatever", "to", "get", "by", "to", "the", "next", "thing", ".", "people", "still", "back", "this", "schmuck", ".", "this", "proves", "that", "people", "get", "the", "government", "they", "deserve", "." ]
is illinois a blue state ? because illinois law allows the use of deadly force in self defense .
ccxzv7u
Libertarian
2,013
is illinois a blue state ? because illinois law allows the use of deadly force in self defense .
is @@illinois## a blue state ? because illinois law allows the use of deadly force in self defense .
is @@illinois## a blue state ? because illinois law allows the use of deadly force in self defense .
[ "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "is", "illinois", "a", "blue", "state", "?", "because", "illinois", "law", "allows", "the", "use", "of", "deadly", "force", "in", "self", "defense", "." ]
be careful . the problem then becomes , does the libertarian party inherit the republican party baggage and the republic party agenda , should it inherit republicans ? i do n't want the republican party replaced . i want republicans to be safely contained in an ineffectual party of their own as well as the democrats .
c90d3sk
Libertarian
2,013
be careful . the problem then becomes , does the libertarian party inherit the republican party baggage and the republic party agenda , should it inherit @@republicans## ? i do n't want the republican party replaced . i want @@republicans## to be safely contained in an ineffectual party of their own as well as the @@democrats## .
be careful . the problem then becomes , does the @@libertarian party## inherit the republican party baggage and the republic party agenda , should it inherit @@republicans## ? i do n't want the @@republican party## replaced . i want @@republicans## to be safely contained in an ineffectual party of their own as well as the @@democrats## .
be careful . the problem then becomes , does the @@libertarian party## inherit the republican party baggage and the @@republic party## agenda , should it inherit @@republicans## ? i do n't want the @@republican party## replaced . i want @@republicans## to be safely contained in an ineffectual party of their own as well as the @@democrats## .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "be", "careful", ".", "the", "problem", "then", "becomes", ",", "does", "the", "libertarian", "party", "inherit", "the", "republican", "party", "baggage", "and", "the", "republic", "party", "agenda", ",", "should", "it", "inherit", "republicans", "?", "i", "do", "n't", "want", "the", "republican", "party", "replaced", ".", "i", "want", "republicans", "to", "be", "safely", "contained", "in", "an", "ineffectual", "party", "of", "their", "own", "as", "well", "as", "the", "democrats", "." ]
believing that you have a right to control other people in any manner whatsoever is the most absurd , arrogant thing i 've ever heard . that is what 's wrong with america . hey now , thats the standard in way more places than america .
cd3x76x
Libertarian
2,013
believing that you have a right to control other people in any manner whatsoever is the most absurd , arrogant thing i 've ever heard . that is what 's wrong with america . hey now , thats the standard in way more places than america .
believing that you have a right to control other people in any manner whatsoever is the most absurd , arrogant thing i 've ever heard . that is what 's wrong with @@america## . hey now , thats the standard in way more places than america .
believing that you have a right to control other people in any manner whatsoever is the most absurd , arrogant thing i 've ever heard . that is what 's wrong with @@america## . hey now , thats the standard in way more places than america .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "believing", "that", "you", "have", "a", "right", "to", "control", "other", "people", "in", "any", "manner", "whatsoever", "is", "the", "most", "absurd", ",", "arrogant", "thing", "i", "'ve", "ever", "heard", ".", "that", "is", "what", "'s", "wrong", "with", "america", ".", "hey", "now", ",", "thats", "the", "standard", "in", "way", "more", "places", "than", "america", "." ]
i think changing incentives is a great way to start .
cctmwjj
Libertarian
2,013
i think changing incentives is a great way to start .
i think changing incentives is a great way to start .
i think changing incentives is a great way to start .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "think", "changing", "incentives", "is", "a", "great", "way", "to", "start", "." ]
they have posters like this in nyc if i recall .
c7qtjw3
Libertarian
2,013
they have posters like this in nyc if i recall .
they have posters like this in nyc if i recall .
they have posters like this in nyc if i recall .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "they", "have", "posters", "like", "this", "in", "nyc", "if", "i", "recall", "." ]
the united states thrived economically because of the slaves . they were essentially free labor . i agree it would have died out because of its moral implications eventually . but it may not have . you 're looking from a very ethnocentric view , but there are many people in other cultures who would disagree with the notion of slavery being immoral . from a historical perspective , once a people are conquered , they are inherently less than '' the conquering race i 'm referring to social darwinism . basically , not all people would have realized the moral implications of slavery , and focused more on the economic advantage , as well as the social idea .
ccobp9h
Libertarian
2,013
the united states thrived economically because of the @@slaves## . they were essentially free labor . i agree it would have died out because of its moral implications eventually . but it may not have . you 're looking from a very ethnocentric view , but there are many @@people in other cultures who would disagree with the notion of slavery being immoral## . from a historical perspective , once a people are conquered , they are inherently less than '' the conquering race i 'm referring to social darwinism . basically , not all people would have realized the moral implications of slavery , and focused more on the economic advantage , as well as the social idea .
@@the united states## thrived economically because of the @@slaves## . they were essentially free labor . i agree it would have died out because of its moral implications eventually . but it may not have . you 're looking from a very ethnocentric view , but there are many people in other cultures who would disagree with the notion of slavery being immoral . from a historical perspective , once a people are conquered , they are inherently less than '' the conquering race i 'm referring to social darwinism . basically , not all people would have realized the moral implications of slavery , and focused more on the economic advantage , as well as the social idea .
@@the united states## thrived economically because of the @@slaves## . they were essentially free labor . i agree it would have died out because of its moral implications eventually . but it may not have . you 're looking from a very ethnocentric view , but there are many people in other cultures who would disagree with the notion of slavery being immoral . from a historical perspective , once a people are conquered , they are inherently less than '' the conquering race i 'm referring to social darwinism . basically , not all people would have realized the moral implications of slavery , and focused more on the economic advantage , as well as the social idea .
[ "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "united", "states", "thrived", "economically", "because", "of", "the", "slaves", ".", "they", "were", "essentially", "free", "labor", ".", "i", "agree", "it", "would", "have", "died", "out", "because", "of", "its", "moral", "implications", "eventually", ".", "but", "it", "may", "not", "have", ".", "you", "'re", "looking", "from", "a", "very", "ethnocentric", "view", ",", "but", "there", "are", "many", "people", "in", "other", "cultures", "who", "would", "disagree", "with", "the", "notion", "of", "slavery", "being", "immoral", ".", "from", "a", "historical", "perspective", ",", "once", "a", "people", "are", "conquered", ",", "they", "are", "inherently", "less", "than", "``", "the", "conquering", "race", "i", "'m", "referring", "to", "social", "darwinism", ".", "basically", ",", "not", "all", "people", "would", "have", "realized", "the", "moral", "implications", "of", "slavery", ",", "and", "focused", "more", "on", "the", "economic", "advantage", ",", "as", "well", "as", "the", "social", "idea", "." ]
link URL the dea has an agent who testified his job is to seek out targets for forfeiture by watching television news and reading newspapers . when he finds a property where drug crimes occur he goes to the registry of deeds . finding the motel caswell had no mortgage and was worth almost 1.5 million , the dea teamed up with the tewksbury police , who were offered 80 percent of the taking , the agent testified . infuriating .
c9qrxne
Libertarian
2,013
link URL the dea has an agent who testified his job is to seek out targets for forfeiture by watching television news and reading newspapers . when he finds a property where drug crimes occur he goes to the registry of deeds . finding the motel caswell had no mortgage and was worth almost 1.5 million , @@the dea## teamed up with the @@tewksbury police## , who were offered 80 percent of the taking , the agent testified . infuriating .
link URL the @@dea## has an agent who testified his job is to seek out targets for forfeiture by watching television news and reading newspapers . when he finds a property where drug crimes occur he goes to the registry of deeds . finding the motel caswell had no mortgage and was worth almost 1.5 million , the @@dea## teamed up with the @@tewksbury police## , who were offered 80 percent of the taking , the agent testified . infuriating .
link URL the @@dea## has an agent who testified his job is to seek out targets for forfeiture by watching television news and reading newspapers . when he finds a property where drug crimes occur he goes to the registry of deeds . finding the motel caswell had no mortgage and was worth almost 1.5 million , the @@dea## teamed up with the @@tewksbury police## , who were offered 80 percent of the taking , the agent testified . infuriating .
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "link", "URL", "the", "dea", "has", "an", "agent", "who", "testified", "his", "job", "is", "to", "seek", "out", "targets", "for", "forfeiture", "by", "watching", "television", "news", "and", "reading", "newspapers", ".", "when", "he", "finds", "a", "property", "where", "drug", "crimes", "occur", "he", "goes", "to", "the", "registry", "of", "deeds", ".", "finding", "the", "motel", "caswell", "had", "no", "mortgage", "and", "was", "worth", "almost", "1.5", "million", ",", "the", "dea", "teamed", "up", "with", "the", "tewksbury", "police", ",", "who", "were", "offered", "80", "percent", "of", "the", "taking", ",", "the", "agent", "testified", ".", "infuriating", "." ]
it 's also john maynard keynes ' birthday today . do n't ask me how i know that .
cad4hzj
Libertarian
2,013
it 's also john maynard keynes ' birthday today . do n't ask me how i know that .
it 's also john maynard keynes ' birthday today . do n't ask me how i know that .
it 's also john maynard keynes ' birthday today . do n't ask me how i know that .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "'s", "also", "john", "maynard", "keynes", "'", "birthday", "today", ".", "do", "n't", "ask", "me", "how", "i", "know", "that", "." ]
or , they were never asked for additional paperwork because they did n't meet the criteria so which is it ?
cazr14j
Libertarian
2,013
or , they were never asked for additional paperwork because they did n't meet the criteria so which is it ?
or , they were never asked for additional paperwork because they did n't meet the criteria so which is it ?
or , they were never asked for additional paperwork because they did n't meet the criteria so which is it ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "or", ",", "they", "were", "never", "asked", "for", "additional", "paperwork", "because", "they", "did", "n't", "meet", "the", "criteria", "so", "which", "is", "it", "?" ]
such a terrible argument based on poor reasoning that also does n't address what i 've said . from your article although limits are posted and enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accidentprone , or under construction or bad weather conditions . on speedunrestricted stretches , an advisory speed limit richtgeschwindigkeit of 130 kilometres per hour 81 mph applies . in 2008 , the state of bremen , geographically smallest of the sixteen states , imposed a 120 kmh 75 mph general speed limit , although this applied to only 11 kilometers 6.8 miles of autobahn 27 connecting the cities of bremen and bremerhaven . why are limits enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accident prone , under construction or bad weather conditions ? i said there are laws against speeding and those laws should be enforced . why should n't they be enforced ? why should people be arrested for driving drunk ? why should people be arrested for shooting in the mall even if no one gets shot ? answering those questions will help you a lot .
cdwvmgg
Libertarian
2,013
such a terrible argument based on poor reasoning that also does n't address what i 've said . from your article although limits are posted and enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accidentprone , or under construction or bad weather conditions . on speedunrestricted stretches , an advisory speed limit richtgeschwindigkeit of 130 kilometres per hour 81 mph applies . in 2008 , the state of bremen , geographically smallest of the sixteen states , imposed a 120 kmh 75 mph general speed limit , although this applied to only 11 kilometers 6.8 miles of autobahn 27 connecting the cities of bremen and bremerhaven . why are limits enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accident prone , under construction or bad weather conditions ? i said there are laws against speeding and those laws should be enforced . why should n't they be enforced ? why should people be arrested for driving drunk ? why should people be arrested for shooting in the mall even if no one gets shot ? answering those questions will help you a lot .
such a terrible argument based on poor reasoning that also does n't address what i 've said . from your article although limits are posted and enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accidentprone , or under construction or bad weather conditions . on speedunrestricted stretches , an advisory speed limit richtgeschwindigkeit of 130 kilometres per hour 81 mph applies . in 2008 , @@the state of bremen## , geographically smallest of the sixteen states , imposed a 120 kmh 75 mph general speed limit , although this applied to only 11 kilometers 6.8 miles of autobahn 27 connecting the cities of bremen and bremerhaven . why are limits enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accident prone , under construction or bad weather conditions ? i said there are laws against speeding and those laws should be enforced . why should n't they be enforced ? why should people be arrested for driving drunk ? why should people be arrested for shooting in the mall even if no one gets shot ? answering those questions will help you a lot .
such a terrible argument based on poor reasoning that also does n't address what i 've said . from your article although limits are posted and enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accidentprone , or under construction or bad weather conditions . on speedunrestricted stretches , an advisory speed limit richtgeschwindigkeit of 130 kilometres per hour 81 mph applies . in 2008 , @@the state of bremen## , geographically smallest of the sixteen states , imposed a 120 kmh 75 mph general speed limit , although this applied to only 11 kilometers 6.8 miles of autobahn 27 connecting the cities of bremen and bremerhaven . why are limits enforced in areas that are urbanized , substandard , accident prone , under construction or bad weather conditions ? i said there are laws against speeding and those laws should be enforced . why should n't they be enforced ? why should people be arrested for driving drunk ? why should people be arrested for shooting in the mall even if no one gets shot ? answering those questions will help you a lot .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "such", "a", "terrible", "argument", "based", "on", "poor", "reasoning", "that", "also", "does", "n't", "address", "what", "i", "'ve", "said", ".", "from", "your", "article", "although", "limits", "are", "posted", "and", "enforced", "in", "areas", "that", "are", "urbanized", ",", "substandard", ",", "accidentprone", ",", "or", "under", "construction", "or", "bad", "weather", "conditions", ".", "on", "speedunrestricted", "stretches", ",", "an", "advisory", "speed", "limit", "richtgeschwindigkeit", "of", "130", "kilometres", "per", "hour", "81", "mph", "applies", ".", "in", "2008", ",", "the", "state", "of", "bremen", ",", "geographically", "smallest", "of", "the", "sixteen", "states", ",", "imposed", "a", "120", "kmh", "75", "mph", "general", "speed", "limit", ",", "although", "this", "applied", "to", "only", "11", "kilometers", "6.8", "miles", "of", "autobahn", "27", "connecting", "the", "cities", "of", "bremen", "and", "bremerhaven", ".", "why", "are", "limits", "enforced", "in", "areas", "that", "are", "urbanized", ",", "substandard", ",", "accident", "prone", ",", "under", "construction", "or", "bad", "weather", "conditions", "?", "i", "said", "there", "are", "laws", "against", "speeding", "and", "those", "laws", "should", "be", "enforced", ".", "why", "should", "n't", "they", "be", "enforced", "?", "why", "should", "people", "be", "arrested", "for", "driving", "drunk", "?", "why", "should", "people", "be", "arrested", "for", "shooting", "in", "the", "mall", "even", "if", "no", "one", "gets", "shot", "?", "answering", "those", "questions", "will", "help", "you", "a", "lot", "." ]
i 'm glad for people like you who ask questions . it 's something more people should do .
c99ui1m
Libertarian
2,013
i 'm glad for people like you who ask questions . it 's something more people should do .
i 'm glad for people like you who ask questions . it 's something more people should do .
i 'm glad for people like you who ask questions . it 's something more people should do .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "glad", "for", "people", "like", "you", "who", "ask", "questions", ".", "it", "'s", "something", "more", "people", "should", "do", "." ]
libertarian '' means that you want to maximize your freedom . it does n't necessarily mean you subscribe to any specific economic hypothesis .
cabzd5u
Libertarian
2,013
libertarian '' means that you want to maximize your freedom . it does n't necessarily mean you subscribe to any specific economic hypothesis .
libertarian '' means that you want to maximize your freedom . it does n't necessarily mean you subscribe to any specific economic hypothesis .
libertarian '' means that you want to maximize your freedom . it does n't necessarily mean you subscribe to any specific economic hypothesis .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "libertarian", "``", "means", "that", "you", "want", "to", "maximize", "your", "freedom", ".", "it", "does", "n't", "necessarily", "mean", "you", "subscribe", "to", "any", "specific", "economic", "hypothesis", "." ]
by having 4 members who follow party line in lockstep , 1 who leans that way , enough nsa dirt on chief justice roberts to force his vote on the big stuff .
ccvlsop
Libertarian
2,013
by having 4 members who follow party line in lockstep , 1 who leans that way , enough nsa dirt on chief justice roberts to force his vote on the big stuff .
by having 4 members who follow party line in lockstep , 1 who leans that way , enough nsa dirt on chief justice roberts to force his vote on the big stuff .
by having 4 members who follow party line in lockstep , 1 who leans that way , enough nsa dirt on chief justice roberts to force his vote on the big stuff .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "by", "having", "4", "members", "who", "follow", "party", "line", "in", "lockstep", ",", "1", "who", "leans", "that", "way", ",", "enough", "nsa", "dirt", "on", "chief", "justice", "roberts", "to", "force", "his", "vote", "on", "the", "big", "stuff", "." ]
the price was already skyrocketing before that . i doubt the government pr meeting did much .
cdjk319
Libertarian
2,013
the price was already skyrocketing before that . i doubt the government pr meeting did much .
the price was already skyrocketing before that . i doubt the government pr meeting did much .
the price was already skyrocketing before that . i doubt the government pr meeting did much .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "price", "was", "already", "skyrocketing", "before", "that", ".", "i", "doubt", "the", "government", "pr", "meeting", "did", "much", "." ]
like this one ? URL . she does n't look to terribly curious about metal detectors here .
caagqba
Libertarian
2,013
like this one ? URL . she does n't look to terribly curious about metal detectors here .
like this one ? URL . she does n't look to terribly curious about metal detectors here .
like this one ? URL . she does n't look to terribly curious about metal detectors here .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "like", "this", "one", "?", "URL", ".", "she", "does", "n't", "look", "to", "terribly", "curious", "about", "metal", "detectors", "here", "." ]