body_cleaned
stringlengths
28
4.28k
id
stringlengths
4
7
subreddit
stringclasses
3 values
year
int64
2.01k
2.02k
annotation1
stringlengths
28
4.33k
annotation2
stringlengths
28
4.34k
gold_annotation
stringlengths
28
4.34k
bio_annotation
sequencelengths
6
841
ids
sequencelengths
6
841
tokenized_body_cleaned
sequencelengths
6
841
let 's not pretend , however , that traditional charities have n't created real change . '' when huge swaths of the global population live in poverty , electric vehicles and mars expeditions are of little value who are worried about diarrhea , plagues , fresh water , drought , housing , etc . many charities do real change '' and many of the results are more immediate than mars communities and electric vehicles . tesla has done more for the ev movement environment than all of the detroit three combined . let 's also remember that although many state governments have been blocking telsa at every chance , there are many states and the federal government who have subsidized tesla 's success . even going so far as fining tesla 's competitors and giving the revenues to tesla , such as california 's program .
cn4eezf
Libertarian
2,014
let 's not pretend , however , that traditional charities have n't created real change . '' when huge swaths of the @@global population## live in poverty , electric vehicles and mars expeditions are of little value who are worried about diarrhea , plagues , fresh water , drought , housing , etc . many charities do real change '' and many of the results are more immediate than mars communities and electric vehicles . tesla has done more for the ev movement environment than all of the detroit three combined . let 's also remember that although many @@state governments## have been blocking telsa at every chance , there are many states and the @@federal government## who have subsidized tesla 's success . even going so far as fining tesla 's competitors and giving the revenues to tesla , such as california 's program .
let 's not pretend , however , that @@traditional charities## have n't created real change . '' when huge swaths of the global population live in poverty , electric vehicles and mars expeditions are of little value who are worried about diarrhea , plagues , fresh water , drought , housing , etc . many @@charities## do real change '' and many of the results are more immediate than @@mars communities## and electric vehicles . @@tesla## has done more for the @@ev movement-## environment than all of @@the detroit three## combined . let 's also remember that although many @@state governments## have been blocking @@telsa## at every chance , there are many @@states and the federal government## who have subsidized @@tesla 's## success . even going so far as fining @@tesla 's competitors## and giving the revenues to @@tesla## , such as california 's program .
let 's not pretend , however , that @@traditional charities## have n't created real change . '' when huge swaths of the global population live in poverty , electric vehicles and mars expeditions are of little value who are worried about diarrhea , plagues , fresh water , drought , housing , etc . many @@charities## do real change '' and many of the results are more immediate than @@mars communities## and electric vehicles . @@tesla## has done more for the @@ev movement-## environment than all of @@the detroit three## combined . let 's also remember that although many @@state governments## have been blocking @@telsa## at every chance , there are many @@states and the federal government## who have subsidized @@tesla 's## success . even going so far as fining @@tesla 's competitors## and giving the revenues to @@tesla## , such as california 's program .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "let", "'s", "not", "pretend", ",", "however", ",", "that", "traditional", "charities", "have", "n't", "created", "real", "change", ".", "``", "when", "huge", "swaths", "of", "the", "global", "population", "live", "in", "poverty", ",", "electric", "vehicles", "and", "mars", "expeditions", "are", "of", "little", "value", "who", "are", "worried", "about", "diarrhea", ",", "plagues", ",", "fresh", "water", ",", "drought", ",", "housing", ",", "etc", ".", "many", "charities", "do", "real", "change", "``", "and", "many", "of", "the", "results", "are", "more", "immediate", "than", "mars", "communities", "and", "electric", "vehicles", ".", "tesla", "has", "done", "more", "for", "the", "ev", "movement", "environment", "than", "all", "of", "the", "detroit", "three", "combined", ".", "let", "'s", "also", "remember", "that", "although", "many", "state", "governments", "have", "been", "blocking", "telsa", "at", "every", "chance", ",", "there", "are", "many", "states", "and", "the", "federal", "government", "who", "have", "subsidized", "tesla", "'s", "success", ".", "even", "going", "so", "far", "as", "fining", "tesla", "'s", "competitors", "and", "giving", "the", "revenues", "to", "tesla", ",", "such", "as", "california", "'s", "program", "." ]
i did n't hear the case . the public details make this sound like a travesty of justice but i 'll defer to the jurors right or wrong because that is what our legal system demands .
cepmdpq
Libertarian
2,014
i did n't hear the case . the public details make this sound like a travesty of justice but i 'll defer to the @@jurors## right or wrong because that is what our legal system demands .
i did n't hear the case . the public details make this sound like a travesty of justice but i 'll defer to the jurors right or wrong because that is what our legal system demands .
i did n't hear the case . the public details make this sound like a travesty of justice but i 'll defer to the @@jurors## right or wrong because that is what our legal system demands .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "did", "n't", "hear", "the", "case", ".", "the", "public", "details", "make", "this", "sound", "like", "a", "travesty", "of", "justice", "but", "i", "'ll", "defer", "to", "the", "jurors", "right", "or", "wrong", "because", "that", "is", "what", "our", "legal", "system", "demands", "." ]
i do n't believe in the state lol tell me another one alice ... people that are a genuinely antistate like myself do not feel the need to play devils advocate '' when the police unethically and immorally murder someone one the street . you ca n't deny there is a change in perception when you suit up in a uniform and a weapon . ohh there is , all citizens become the enemy , all statements become commandments , and all persons must obey . the the mind of modern law enforcer they are the law , we are the chattel , compliance will be rewarded , dissension must be crushed .
cmg1bly
Libertarian
2,014
i do n't believe in the state lol tell me another one alice ... people that are a genuinely antistate like myself do not feel the need to play devils advocate '' when the @@police## unethically and immorally murder someone one the street . you ca n't deny there is a change in perception when you suit up in a uniform and a weapon . ohh there is , all citizens become the enemy , all statements become commandments , and all persons must obey . the the mind of modern law enforcer they are the law , we are the chattel , compliance will be rewarded , dissension must be crushed .
i do n't believe in the state lol tell me another one alice ... people that are a genuinely antistate like myself do not feel the need to play devils advocate '' when the @@police## unethically and immorally murder someone one the street . you ca n't deny there is a change in perception when you suit up in a uniform and a weapon . ohh there is , @@all citizens## become the enemy , all statements become commandments , and @@all persons## must obey . the the mind of modern law enforcer they are the law , we are the chattel , compliance will be rewarded , dissension must be crushed .
i do n't believe in the state lol tell me another one alice ... people that are a genuinely antistate like myself do not feel the need to play devils advocate '' when the @@police## unethically and immorally murder someone one the street . you ca n't deny there is a change in perception when you suit up in a uniform and a weapon . ohh there is , all citizens become the enemy , all statements become commandments , and all persons must obey . the the mind of modern law enforcer they are the law , we are the chattel , compliance will be rewarded , dissension must be crushed .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "do", "n't", "believe", "in", "the", "state", "lol", "tell", "me", "another", "one", "alice", "...", "people", "that", "are", "a", "genuinely", "antistate", "like", "myself", "do", "not", "feel", "the", "need", "to", "play", "devils", "advocate", "``", "when", "the", "police", "unethically", "and", "immorally", "murder", "someone", "one", "the", "street", ".", "you", "ca", "n't", "deny", "there", "is", "a", "change", "in", "perception", "when", "you", "suit", "up", "in", "a", "uniform", "and", "a", "weapon", ".", "ohh", "there", "is", ",", "all", "citizens", "become", "the", "enemy", ",", "all", "statements", "become", "commandments", ",", "and", "all", "persons", "must", "obey", ".", "the", "the", "mind", "of", "modern", "law", "enforcer", "they", "are", "the", "law", ",", "we", "are", "the", "chattel", ",", "compliance", "will", "be", "rewarded", ",", "dissension", "must", "be", "crushed", "." ]
um , who gives a shit ? is he not allowed to be wealthy because he criticizes the wealthy ? is this SUBREDDIT ?
cj6er5d
Libertarian
2,014
um , who gives a shit ? is he not allowed to be wealthy because he criticizes @@the wealthy## ? is this SUBREDDIT ?
um , who gives a shit ? is he not allowed to be wealthy because he criticizes the wealthy ? is this SUBREDDIT ?
um , who gives a shit ? is he not allowed to be wealthy because he criticizes @@the wealthy## ? is this SUBREDDIT ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "um", ",", "who", "gives", "a", "shit", "?", "is", "he", "not", "allowed", "to", "be", "wealthy", "because", "he", "criticizes", "the", "wealthy", "?", "is", "this", "SUBREDDIT", "?" ]
you got ta love how in libertarian circles all you hear is taxes bad '' until it comes to immigrants , then all of a sudden it 's a massive sin and terrible drain on the economy . libertarians are also all about rejecting laws that go against their values of liberty , such as drug laws and nanny state laws . then you start talking about illegal immigration and human being 's rights to move freely , suddenly the law is set in stone and undeniable . it 's one of many reasons i 'm losing my faith in this whole movement
cldg9c3
Libertarian
2,014
you got ta love how in libertarian circles all you hear is taxes bad '' until it comes to @@immigrants## , then all of a sudden it 's a massive sin and terrible drain on the economy . @@libertarians## are also all about rejecting laws that go against their values of liberty , such as drug laws and nanny state laws . then you start talking about illegal immigration and @@human being## 's rights to move freely , suddenly the law is set in stone and undeniable . it 's one of many reasons i 'm losing my faith in this whole movement
you got ta love how in libertarian circles all you hear is taxes bad '' until it comes to @@immigrants## , then all of a sudden it 's a massive sin and terrible drain on the economy . @@libertarians## are also all about rejecting laws that go against their values of liberty , such as drug laws and nanny state laws . then you start talking about illegal immigration and human being 's rights to move freely , suddenly the law is set in stone and undeniable . it 's one of many reasons i 'm losing my faith in this whole movement
you got ta love how in libertarian circles all you hear is taxes bad '' until it comes to @@immigrants## , then all of a sudden it 's a massive sin and terrible drain on the economy . @@libertarians## are also all about rejecting laws that go against their values of liberty , such as drug laws and nanny state laws . then you start talking about illegal immigration and human being 's rights to move freely , suddenly the law is set in stone and undeniable . it 's one of many reasons i 'm losing my faith in this whole movement
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "got", "ta", "love", "how", "in", "libertarian", "circles", "all", "you", "hear", "is", "taxes", "bad", "``", "until", "it", "comes", "to", "immigrants", ",", "then", "all", "of", "a", "sudden", "it", "'s", "a", "massive", "sin", "and", "terrible", "drain", "on", "the", "economy", ".", "libertarians", "are", "also", "all", "about", "rejecting", "laws", "that", "go", "against", "their", "values", "of", "liberty", ",", "such", "as", "drug", "laws", "and", "nanny", "state", "laws", ".", "then", "you", "start", "talking", "about", "illegal", "immigration", "and", "human", "being", "'s", "rights", "to", "move", "freely", ",", "suddenly", "the", "law", "is", "set", "in", "stone", "and", "undeniable", ".", "it", "'s", "one", "of", "many", "reasons", "i", "'m", "losing", "my", "faith", "in", "this", "whole", "movement" ]
taking over healthcare means dictating what can and can not be treated . not that doctors can not ask you about things unrelated to your health , then take note of that answer on a form . you 'll notice that there 's no restriction over a doctor asking about your drug use ... because that 's relevant to your health . you need to learn to separate the stuff from the stuff .
cjbqawc
Libertarian
2,014
taking over healthcare means dictating what can and can not be treated . not that @@doctors## can not ask you about things unrelated to your health , then take note of that answer on a form . you 'll notice that there 's no restriction over a doctor asking about your drug use ... because that 's relevant to your health . you need to learn to separate the stuff from the stuff .
taking over healthcare means dictating what can and can not be treated . not that @@doctors## can not ask you about things unrelated to your health , then take note of that answer on a form . you 'll notice that there 's no restriction over a doctor asking about your drug use ... because that 's relevant to your health . you need to learn to separate the stuff from the stuff .
taking over healthcare means dictating what can and can not be treated . not that @@doctors## can not ask you about things unrelated to your health , then take note of that answer on a form . you 'll notice that there 's no restriction over a doctor asking about your drug use ... because that 's relevant to your health . you need to learn to separate the stuff from the stuff .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "taking", "over", "healthcare", "means", "dictating", "what", "can", "and", "can", "not", "be", "treated", ".", "not", "that", "doctors", "can", "not", "ask", "you", "about", "things", "unrelated", "to", "your", "health", ",", "then", "take", "note", "of", "that", "answer", "on", "a", "form", ".", "you", "'ll", "notice", "that", "there", "'s", "no", "restriction", "over", "a", "doctor", "asking", "about", "your", "drug", "use", "...", "because", "that", "'s", "relevant", "to", "your", "health", ".", "you", "need", "to", "learn", "to", "separate", "the", "stuff", "from", "the", "stuff", "." ]
certainly not . but he 's not running up on people and shoving guns in their faces . no , he just used his size to intimidate and toss around a small guy so he could steal some cigars and committed a felony in the process . he 's an 18 year old punk ass kid , just like all of us were at some point or another . yeah , every 18 year old runs around robbing people . boys will be boys ! i do n't know about you , but at that age i violated quite a few criminal laws on a regular basis . congratulations . i 'm not like you . they ought to be punished for it , but not shot dead . again , do n't attack and try and steal a cop 's gun . how many people would believe it if a cop claimed that a suburban white kid did such a thing ? probably not a lot . why , exactly ? idiot robs store , then gets in a violent confrontation with a cop who might bust him and send him to prison ? yeah , completely implausible ! the reason so many people are willing to believe this cop 's pretty nonsensical story i.e . kid charges headlong into hail of bullets '' is because of racial stereotypes of young black men as out of control and violent . no , the reason people are buying the cop 's story is that the eyewitnesses claiming he tried to surrender have already been discredited , and , as the video from this post shows , there are other eyewitnesses which do n't discredit the cop 's story . add in that he had just freshly committed a robbery and it 's perfectly plausible . it has nothing to do with race . you say this like it 's a fact . all the eyewitness testimony , including those which tried to support the version where brown wanted to surrender , indicate he had a fight with the cop first . you do n't think cops are capable of lying , especially when the consequences of the truth could be a jail cell ? likewise for brown 's partner in robbing a store . you take this thirdhand media report and just assume it 's the gospel truth . you take an eyewitness report from a guy that just helped his friend rob a store as gospel truth . why ?
cjuxrpj
Libertarian
2,014
certainly not . but he 's not running up on people and shoving guns in their faces . no , he just used his size to intimidate and toss around a small guy so he could steal some cigars and committed a felony in the process . he 's an 18 year old punk ass kid , just like all of us were at some point or another . yeah , every 18 year old runs around robbing people . @@boys## will be @@boys## ! i do n't know about you , but at that age i violated quite a few criminal laws on a regular basis . congratulations . i 'm not like you . they ought to be punished for it , but not shot dead . again , do n't attack and try and steal a cop 's gun . how many people would believe it if a cop claimed that a suburban white kid did such a thing ? probably not a lot . why , exactly ? idiot robs store , then gets in a violent confrontation with a cop who might bust him and send him to prison ? yeah , completely implausible ! the reason so many people are willing to believe this cop 's pretty nonsensical story i.e . kid charges headlong into hail of bullets '' is because of racial stereotypes of @@young black men## as out of control and violent . no , the reason people are buying the cop 's story is that the eyewitnesses claiming he tried to surrender have already been discredited , and , as the video from this post shows , there are other eyewitnesses which do n't discredit the cop 's story . add in that he had just freshly committed a robbery and it 's perfectly plausible . it has nothing to do with race . you say this like it 's a fact . all the eyewitness testimony , including those which tried to support the version where brown wanted to surrender , indicate he had a fight with the cop first . you do n't think @@cops## are capable of lying , especially when the consequences of the truth could be a jail cell ? likewise for brown 's partner in robbing a store . you take this thirdhand media report and just assume it 's the gospel truth . you take an eyewitness report from a guy that just helped his friend rob a store as gospel truth . why ?
certainly not . but he 's not running up on people and shoving guns in their faces . no , he just used his size to intimidate and toss around a small guy so he could steal some cigars and committed a felony in the process . he 's an 18 year old punk ass kid , just like all of us were at some point or another . yeah , every 18 year old runs around robbing people . @@boys## will be @@boys## ! i do n't know about you , but at that age i violated quite a few criminal laws on a regular basis . congratulations . i 'm not like you . they ought to be punished for it , but not shot dead . again , do n't attack and try and steal a cop 's gun . how many people would believe it if a cop claimed that a suburban white kid did such a thing ? probably not a lot . why , exactly ? idiot robs store , then gets in a violent confrontation with a cop who might bust him and send him to prison ? yeah , completely implausible ! the reason so many people are willing to believe this cop 's pretty nonsensical story i.e . kid charges headlong into hail of bullets '' is because of racial stereotypes of @@young black men## as out of control and violent . no , the reason people are buying the cop 's story is that the @@eyewitnesses## claiming he tried to surrender have already been discredited , and , as the video from this post shows , there are other @@eyewitnesses## which do n't discredit the cop 's story . add in that he had just freshly committed a robbery and it 's perfectly plausible . it has nothing to do with race . you say this like it 's a fact . all the eyewitness testimony , including those which tried to support the version where brown wanted to surrender , indicate he had a fight with the cop first . you do n't think @@cops## are capable of lying , especially when the consequences of the truth could be a jail cell ? likewise for brown 's partner in robbing a store . you take this thirdhand media report and just assume it 's the gospel truth . you take an eyewitness report from a guy that just helped his friend rob a store as gospel truth . why ?
certainly not . but he 's not running up on people and shoving guns in their faces . no , he just used his size to intimidate and toss around a small guy so he could steal some cigars and committed a felony in the process . he 's an 18 year old punk ass kid , just like all of us were at some point or another . yeah , every 18 year old runs around robbing people . @@boys## will be @@boys## ! i do n't know about you , but at that age i violated quite a few criminal laws on a regular basis . congratulations . i 'm not like you . they ought to be punished for it , but not shot dead . again , do n't attack and try and steal a cop 's gun . how many people would believe it if a cop claimed that a suburban white kid did such a thing ? probably not a lot . why , exactly ? idiot robs store , then gets in a violent confrontation with a cop who might bust him and send him to prison ? yeah , completely implausible ! the reason so many people are willing to believe this cop 's pretty nonsensical story i.e . kid charges headlong into hail of bullets '' is because of racial stereotypes of @@young black men## as out of control and violent . no , the reason people are buying the cop 's story is that the @@eyewitnesses## claiming he tried to surrender have already been discredited , and , as the video from this post shows , there are other @@eyewitnesses## which do n't discredit the cop 's story . add in that he had just freshly committed a robbery and it 's perfectly plausible . it has nothing to do with race . you say this like it 's a fact . all the eyewitness testimony , including those which tried to support the version where brown wanted to surrender , indicate he had a fight with the cop first . you do n't think @@cops## are capable of lying , especially when the consequences of the truth could be a jail cell ? likewise for brown 's partner in robbing a store . you take this thirdhand media report and just assume it 's the gospel truth . you take an eyewitness report from a guy that just helped his friend rob a store as gospel truth . why ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "certainly", "not", ".", "but", "he", "'s", "not", "running", "up", "on", "people", "and", "shoving", "guns", "in", "their", "faces", ".", "no", ",", "he", "just", "used", "his", "size", "to", "intimidate", "and", "toss", "around", "a", "small", "guy", "so", "he", "could", "steal", "some", "cigars", "and", "committed", "a", "felony", "in", "the", "process", ".", "he", "'s", "an", "18", "year", "old", "punk", "ass", "kid", ",", "just", "like", "all", "of", "us", "were", "at", "some", "point", "or", "another", ".", "yeah", ",", "every", "18", "year", "old", "runs", "around", "robbing", "people", ".", "boys", "will", "be", "boys", "!", "i", "do", "n't", "know", "about", "you", ",", "but", "at", "that", "age", "i", "violated", "quite", "a", "few", "criminal", "laws", "on", "a", "regular", "basis", ".", "congratulations", ".", "i", "'m", "not", "like", "you", ".", "they", "ought", "to", "be", "punished", "for", "it", ",", "but", "not", "shot", "dead", ".", "again", ",", "do", "n't", "attack", "and", "try", "and", "steal", "a", "cop", "'s", "gun", ".", "how", "many", "people", "would", "believe", "it", "if", "a", "cop", "claimed", "that", "a", "suburban", "white", "kid", "did", "such", "a", "thing", "?", "probably", "not", "a", "lot", ".", "why", ",", "exactly", "?", "idiot", "robs", "store", ",", "then", "gets", "in", "a", "violent", "confrontation", "with", "a", "cop", "who", "might", "bust", "him", "and", "send", "him", "to", "prison", "?", "yeah", ",", "completely", "implausible", "!", "the", "reason", "so", "many", "people", "are", "willing", "to", "believe", "this", "cop", "'s", "pretty", "nonsensical", "story", "i.e", ".", "kid", "charges", "headlong", "into", "hail", "of", "bullets", "``", "is", "because", "of", "racial", "stereotypes", "of", "young", "black", "men", "as", "out", "of", "control", "and", "violent", ".", "no", ",", "the", "reason", "people", "are", "buying", "the", "cop", "'s", "story", "is", "that", "the", "eyewitnesses", "claiming", "he", "tried", "to", "surrender", "have", "already", "been", "discredited", ",", "and", ",", "as", "the", "video", "from", "this", "post", "shows", ",", "there", "are", "other", "eyewitnesses", "which", "do", "n't", "discredit", "the", "cop", "'s", "story", ".", "add", "in", "that", "he", "had", "just", "freshly", "committed", "a", "robbery", "and", "it", "'s", "perfectly", "plausible", ".", "it", "has", "nothing", "to", "do", "with", "race", ".", "you", "say", "this", "like", "it", "'s", "a", "fact", ".", "all", "the", "eyewitness", "testimony", ",", "including", "those", "which", "tried", "to", "support", "the", "version", "where", "brown", "wanted", "to", "surrender", ",", "indicate", "he", "had", "a", "fight", "with", "the", "cop", "first", ".", "you", "do", "n't", "think", "cops", "are", "capable", "of", "lying", ",", "especially", "when", "the", "consequences", "of", "the", "truth", "could", "be", "a", "jail", "cell", "?", "likewise", "for", "brown", "'s", "partner", "in", "robbing", "a", "store", ".", "you", "take", "this", "thirdhand", "media", "report", "and", "just", "assume", "it", "'s", "the", "gospel", "truth", ".", "you", "take", "an", "eyewitness", "report", "from", "a", "guy", "that", "just", "helped", "his", "friend", "rob", "a", "store", "as", "gospel", "truth", ".", "why", "?" ]
which is weird , because i 've known several self identified liberals who love it as a book , even though they hate everything she believed in .
cidrl9d
Libertarian
2,014
which is weird , because i 've known several self identified @@liberals## who love it as a book , even though they hate everything she believed in .
which is weird , because i 've known several @@self identified liberals## who love it as a book , even though they hate everything she believed in .
which is weird , because i 've known several @@self identified liberals## who love it as a book , even though they hate everything she believed in .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "which", "is", "weird", ",", "because", "i", "'ve", "known", "several", "self", "identified", "liberals", "who", "love", "it", "as", "a", "book", ",", "even", "though", "they", "hate", "everything", "she", "believed", "in", "." ]
it is not in any way harmed if your employer refuses to pay for your plan b. you still have the ability to purchase your own health care coverage , or purchase your own plan b .
cikzya4
Libertarian
2,014
it is not in any way harmed if your employer refuses to pay for your plan b. you still have the ability to purchase your own health care coverage , or purchase your own plan b .
it is not in any way harmed if your employer refuses to pay for your plan b. you still have the ability to purchase your own health care coverage , or purchase your own plan b .
it is not in any way harmed if your employer refuses to pay for your plan b. you still have the ability to purchase your own health care coverage , or purchase your own plan b .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "is", "not", "in", "any", "way", "harmed", "if", "your", "employer", "refuses", "to", "pay", "for", "your", "plan", "b.", "you", "still", "have", "the", "ability", "to", "purchase", "your", "own", "health", "care", "coverage", ",", "or", "purchase", "your", "own", "plan", "b", "." ]
URL previously answered . circular conversations are so little fun .
cfx2av5
Libertarian
2,014
URL previously answered . circular conversations are so little fun .
URL previously answered . circular conversations are so little fun .
URL previously answered . circular conversations are so little fun .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "URL", "previously", "answered", ".", "circular", "conversations", "are", "so", "little", "fun", "." ]
with all the misinformation flying around on both sides right now it 's hard to nail down any exact figures for before and after . i do know the blm was created in 1945 , but that it did n't begin levying fees on that land in particular until 1993. presumably , they were not managing '' the land prior to 1993 and instead a more local authority was maintaining governance in some fashion . i recall reading an article that implied the land was sold to the feds by the local government in 1993 which is why they began issuing fees at that time . i do not have any sources on that however as i do not recall where i read that .
cgs9qxa
Libertarian
2,014
with all the misinformation flying around on both sides right now it 's hard to nail down any exact figures for before and after . i do know @@the blm## was created in 1945 , but that it did n't begin levying fees on that land in particular until 1993. presumably , they were not managing '' the land prior to 1993 and instead a more local authority was maintaining governance in some fashion . i recall reading an article that implied the land was sold to the @@feds## by the local government in 1993 which is why they began issuing fees at that time . i do not have any sources on that however as i do not recall where i read that .
with all the misinformation flying around on both sides right now it 's hard to nail down any exact figures for before and after . i do know the @@blm## was created in 1945 , but that it did n't begin levying fees on that land in particular until 1993. presumably , they were not managing '' the land prior to 1993 and instead a more @@local authority## was maintaining governance in some fashion . i recall reading an article that implied the land was sold to the @@feds## by the @@local government## in 1993 which is why they began issuing fees at that time . i do not have any sources on that however as i do not recall where i read that .
with all the misinformation flying around on both sides right now it 's hard to nail down any exact figures for before and after . i do know the @@blm## was created in 1945 , but that it did n't begin levying fees on that land in particular until 1993. presumably , they were not managing '' the land prior to 1993 and instead a more @@local authority## was maintaining governance in some fashion . i recall reading an article that implied the land was sold to the @@feds## by the @@local government## in 1993 which is why they began issuing fees at that time . i do not have any sources on that however as i do not recall where i read that .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "with", "all", "the", "misinformation", "flying", "around", "on", "both", "sides", "right", "now", "it", "'s", "hard", "to", "nail", "down", "any", "exact", "figures", "for", "before", "and", "after", ".", "i", "do", "know", "the", "blm", "was", "created", "in", "1945", ",", "but", "that", "it", "did", "n't", "begin", "levying", "fees", "on", "that", "land", "in", "particular", "until", "1993.", "presumably", ",", "they", "were", "not", "managing", "``", "the", "land", "prior", "to", "1993", "and", "instead", "a", "more", "local", "authority", "was", "maintaining", "governance", "in", "some", "fashion", ".", "i", "recall", "reading", "an", "article", "that", "implied", "the", "land", "was", "sold", "to", "the", "feds", "by", "the", "local", "government", "in", "1993", "which", "is", "why", "they", "began", "issuing", "fees", "at", "that", "time", ".", "i", "do", "not", "have", "any", "sources", "on", "that", "however", "as", "i", "do", "not", "recall", "where", "i", "read", "that", "." ]
bring me some burger king for supper tonight . you can use snap benefits to purchase burger king meals . bringing it to you is another matter , though .
ci6yq87
Libertarian
2,014
bring me some burger king for supper tonight . you can use snap benefits to purchase burger king meals . bringing it to you is another matter , though .
bring me some burger king for supper tonight . you can use snap benefits to purchase burger king meals . bringing it to you is another matter , though .
bring me some burger king for supper tonight . you can use snap benefits to purchase burger king meals . bringing it to you is another matter , though .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "bring", "me", "some", "burger", "king", "for", "supper", "tonight", ".", "you", "can", "use", "snap", "benefits", "to", "purchase", "burger", "king", "meals", ".", "bringing", "it", "to", "you", "is", "another", "matter", ",", "though", "." ]
implying socialists cant be libertarian . market liberalism and socialism are diametrically opposed . while common ground could be found in social issues , libertarians would generally strongly oppose central socialist tenants like progressive taxation , interference in the market , or any kind of coercion into peoples ' personal financial lives . i lumped socialists and progressives together because they generally have no problem implementing polices that profoundly interfere with peoples ' personal and financial lives .
cgbdshw
Libertarian
2,014
implying @@socialists## cant be @@libertarian## . market liberalism and socialism are diametrically opposed . while common ground could be found in social issues , @@libertarians## would generally strongly oppose central socialist tenants like progressive taxation , interference in the market , or any kind of coercion into peoples ' personal financial lives . i lumped @@socialists## and @@progressives## together because they generally have no problem implementing polices that profoundly interfere with peoples ' personal and financial lives .
implying @@socialists## cant be libertarian . market liberalism and socialism are diametrically opposed . while common ground could be found in social issues , @@libertarians## would generally strongly oppose central socialist tenants like progressive taxation , interference in the market , or any kind of coercion into peoples ' personal financial lives . i lumped @@socialists## and progressives together because they generally have no problem implementing polices that profoundly interfere with peoples ' personal and financial lives .
implying @@socialists## cant be libertarian . market liberalism and socialism are diametrically opposed . while common ground could be found in social issues , @@libertarians## would generally strongly oppose central socialist tenants like progressive taxation , interference in the market , or any kind of coercion into peoples ' personal financial lives . i lumped @@socialists## and @@progressives## together because they generally have no problem implementing polices that profoundly interfere with peoples ' personal and financial lives .
[ "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "implying", "socialists", "cant", "be", "libertarian", ".", "market", "liberalism", "and", "socialism", "are", "diametrically", "opposed", ".", "while", "common", "ground", "could", "be", "found", "in", "social", "issues", ",", "libertarians", "would", "generally", "strongly", "oppose", "central", "socialist", "tenants", "like", "progressive", "taxation", ",", "interference", "in", "the", "market", ",", "or", "any", "kind", "of", "coercion", "into", "peoples", "'", "personal", "financial", "lives", ".", "i", "lumped", "socialists", "and", "progressives", "together", "because", "they", "generally", "have", "no", "problem", "implementing", "polices", "that", "profoundly", "interfere", "with", "peoples", "'", "personal", "and", "financial", "lives", "." ]
nooo ! only one side can be right and i will continue having a hissy fit and shitting on the constitution until my side wins !
cm0djtb
Libertarian
2,014
nooo ! only one side can be right and i will continue having a hissy fit and shitting on the constitution until my side wins !
nooo ! only one side can be right and i will continue having a hissy fit and shitting on the constitution until my side wins !
nooo ! only one side can be right and i will continue having a hissy fit and shitting on the constitution until my side wins !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "nooo", "!", "only", "one", "side", "can", "be", "right", "and", "i", "will", "continue", "having", "a", "hissy", "fit", "and", "shitting", "on", "the", "constitution", "until", "my", "side", "wins", "!" ]
no , they could n't . they have enough to temporarily suppress the price , but not permanently destroy its value . bitcoin 's value originates from its usefulness as a network . that value will ultimately grow into the trillions of dollars , outside of any government 's purview .
cfqdx19
Libertarian
2,014
no , they could n't . they have enough to temporarily suppress the price , but not permanently destroy its value . bitcoin 's value originates from its usefulness as a network . that value will ultimately grow into the trillions of dollars , outside of any government 's purview .
no , they could n't . they have enough to temporarily suppress the price , but not permanently destroy its value . bitcoin 's value originates from its usefulness as a network . that value will ultimately grow into the trillions of dollars , outside of any government 's purview .
no , they could n't . they have enough to temporarily suppress the price , but not permanently destroy its value . bitcoin 's value originates from its usefulness as a network . that value will ultimately grow into the trillions of dollars , outside of any government 's purview .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "no", ",", "they", "could", "n't", ".", "they", "have", "enough", "to", "temporarily", "suppress", "the", "price", ",", "but", "not", "permanently", "destroy", "its", "value", ".", "bitcoin", "'s", "value", "originates", "from", "its", "usefulness", "as", "a", "network", ".", "that", "value", "will", "ultimately", "grow", "into", "the", "trillions", "of", "dollars", ",", "outside", "of", "any", "government", "'s", "purview", "." ]
atm only has one function . it 's not handling 6 orders , each with a selection of a dozen toppings , drinks , and sizes , i do n't want nuggets anymore , i want hamburger ! '' mistakes and changes . compound that with the average iq , and yea , i foresee long lines .
clig21g
Libertarian
2,014
atm only has one function . it 's not handling 6 orders , each with a selection of a dozen toppings , drinks , and sizes , i do n't want nuggets anymore , i want hamburger ! '' mistakes and changes . compound that with the average iq , and yea , i foresee long lines .
atm only has one function . it 's not handling 6 orders , each with a selection of a dozen toppings , drinks , and sizes , i do n't want nuggets anymore , i want hamburger ! '' mistakes and changes . compound that with the average iq , and yea , i foresee long lines .
atm only has one function . it 's not handling 6 orders , each with a selection of a dozen toppings , drinks , and sizes , i do n't want nuggets anymore , i want hamburger ! '' mistakes and changes . compound that with the average iq , and yea , i foresee long lines .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "atm", "only", "has", "one", "function", ".", "it", "'s", "not", "handling", "6", "orders", ",", "each", "with", "a", "selection", "of", "a", "dozen", "toppings", ",", "drinks", ",", "and", "sizes", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "want", "nuggets", "anymore", ",", "i", "want", "hamburger", "!", "``", "mistakes", "and", "changes", ".", "compound", "that", "with", "the", "average", "iq", ",", "and", "yea", ",", "i", "foresee", "long", "lines", "." ]
i get it . libertarians like you do n't care about other issues , just economics . so you are fine with republicans using violence to repress other rights as long as business owners are protected .
ch3zbv3
Libertarian
2,014
i get it . @@libertarians## like you do n't care about other issues , just economics . so you are fine with @@republicans## using violence to repress other rights as long as @@business owners## are protected .
i get it . @@libertarians## like you do n't care about other issues , just economics . so you are fine with @@republicans## using violence to repress other rights as long as business owners are protected .
i get it . @@libertarians## like you do n't care about other issues , just economics . so you are fine with @@republicans## using violence to repress other rights as long as @@business owners## are protected .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "get", "it", ".", "libertarians", "like", "you", "do", "n't", "care", "about", "other", "issues", ",", "just", "economics", ".", "so", "you", "are", "fine", "with", "republicans", "using", "violence", "to", "repress", "other", "rights", "as", "long", "as", "business", "owners", "are", "protected", "." ]
i do n't believe he did either of those things .
ckb3d9v
Libertarian
2,014
i do n't believe he did either of those things .
i do n't believe he did either of those things .
i do n't believe he did either of those things .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "do", "n't", "believe", "he", "did", "either", "of", "those", "things", "." ]
actually he said all of the horror stories being told in america are untrue . apparently the koch brothers ' tentacles reach so deep that you ca n't trust family members , friends , or coworkers when they tell you about their premiums skyrocketing or losing their doctors . the only people you can trust to tell the truth about obamacare are harry reid and his gang . the same mother fuckers that promised if you like your plan , you can keep your plan . period . the same group that did n't read the damn bill before they passed it . give me a break .
cfq6ccr
Libertarian
2,014
actually he said all of the horror stories being told in america are untrue . apparently the koch brothers ' tentacles reach so deep that you ca n't trust family members , friends , or coworkers when they tell you about their premiums skyrocketing or losing their @@doctors## . the only people you can trust to tell the truth about obamacare are harry reid and his gang . the same mother fuckers that promised if you like your plan , you can keep your plan . period . the same group that did n't read the damn bill before they passed it . give me a break .
actually he said all of the horror stories being told in america are untrue . apparently the @@koch brothers## ' tentacles reach so deep that you ca n't trust @@family members## , @@friends## , or @@coworkers## when they tell you about their premiums skyrocketing or losing their @@doctors## . the only @@people you can trust## to tell the truth about obamacare are @@harry reid and his gang## . the same mother fuckers that promised if you like your plan , you can keep your plan . period . the same group that did n't read the damn bill before they passed it . give me a break .
actually he said all of the horror stories being told in america are untrue . apparently the @@koch brothers## ' tentacles reach so deep that you ca n't trust @@family members## , @@friends## , or @@coworkers## when they tell you about their premiums skyrocketing or losing their @@doctors## . the only @@people you can trust## to tell the truth about obamacare are @@harry reid and his gang## . the same mother fuckers that promised if you like your plan , you can keep your plan . period . the same group that did n't read the damn bill before they passed it . give me a break .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "actually", "he", "said", "all", "of", "the", "horror", "stories", "being", "told", "in", "america", "are", "untrue", ".", "apparently", "the", "koch", "brothers", "'", "tentacles", "reach", "so", "deep", "that", "you", "ca", "n't", "trust", "family", "members", ",", "friends", ",", "or", "coworkers", "when", "they", "tell", "you", "about", "their", "premiums", "skyrocketing", "or", "losing", "their", "doctors", ".", "the", "only", "people", "you", "can", "trust", "to", "tell", "the", "truth", "about", "obamacare", "are", "harry", "reid", "and", "his", "gang", ".", "the", "same", "mother", "fuckers", "that", "promised", "if", "you", "like", "your", "plan", ",", "you", "can", "keep", "your", "plan", ".", "period", ".", "the", "same", "group", "that", "did", "n't", "read", "the", "damn", "bill", "before", "they", "passed", "it", ".", "give", "me", "a", "break", "." ]
thanks for the thoughtful reply . in terms of violence , i did not mean there was any violence taking place in individual businesses , although to ignore the violent history of labour rights in the u.s. and indeed the world is a huge mistake . there have indeed been many people killed , oppressed , and subjected to government violence in attempts to democratize the state capitalist system . reading about the labour movement 's history in the u.s. would illustrate that immediately . i agree with you about mutual labour contracts , and the employer and employee relationship being legitimate , but the major form of oppression comes from the lack of options . if you want to join a business for instance in it , the only option is to join an authoritarian run business . there are no or very few it coops , so a person wanting to apply their trade must either create their own business and absorb the value of their employee 's labour , or have their own labour value absorbed by their boss . because of all of the advantages running an authoritarian business has in the government and law , even people wanting to create a more democratic business have very little leeway to do so . tax breaks , subsidies , and regulations all favour authoritarian business . there is no democracy in business . it is currently structured in an authoritarian manner and this damages our freedoms and it hinders the spread of liberty . i also appreciate many of the similarities between right and left wing libertarians and i think we have more in common than most would have us believe . we may not agree on how to structure our society in terms of positive rights for individuals health , education , welfare , etc , but we can all agree that the system we have now is not fair , not free , and by including more options and removing many of the state capitalist barriers that the government props up , we can have a more free society . we can argue over the right to health and education after we have together reduced much of the undue power state capitalism has achieved .
clohxev
Libertarian
2,014
thanks for the thoughtful reply . in terms of violence , i did not mean there was any violence taking place in individual businesses , although to ignore the violent history of labour rights in the u.s. and indeed the world is a huge mistake . there have indeed been many people killed , oppressed , and subjected to government violence in attempts to democratize the state capitalist system . reading about the labour movement 's history in the u.s. would illustrate that immediately . i agree with you about mutual labour contracts , and the employer and employee relationship being legitimate , but the major form of oppression comes from the lack of options . if you want to join a business for instance in it , the only option is to join an authoritarian run business . there are no or very few it coops , so a person wanting to apply their trade must either create their own business and absorb the value of their employee 's labour , or have their own labour value absorbed by their boss . because of all of the advantages running an authoritarian business has in the government and law , even people wanting to create a more democratic business have very little leeway to do so . tax breaks , subsidies , and regulations all favour authoritarian business . there is no democracy in business . it is currently structured in an authoritarian manner and this damages our freedoms and it hinders the spread of liberty . i also appreciate many of the similarities between @@right and left wing libertarians## and i think we have more in common than most would have us believe . we may not agree on how to structure our society in terms of positive rights for individuals health , education , welfare , etc , but we can all agree that the system we have now is not fair , not free , and by including more options and removing many of the state capitalist barriers that the government props up , we can have a more free society . we can argue over the right to health and education after we have together reduced much of the undue power state capitalism has achieved .
thanks for the thoughtful reply . in terms of violence , i did not mean there was any violence taking place in @@individual businesses## , although to ignore the violent history of labour rights in @@the u.s.## and indeed the world is a huge mistake . there have indeed been many people killed , oppressed , and subjected to government violence in attempts to democratize the state capitalist system . reading about the @@labour movement 's## history in @@the u.s.## would illustrate that immediately . i agree with you about mutual labour contracts , and the employer and employee relationship being legitimate , but the major form of oppression comes from the lack of options . if you want to join a business for instance in it , the only option is to join an authoritarian run business . there are no or very few it coops , so a person wanting to apply their trade must either create their own business and absorb the value of their employee 's labour , or have their own labour value absorbed by their boss . because of all of the advantages running an authoritarian business has in the government and law , even @@people wanting to create a more democratic business## have very little leeway to do so . tax breaks , subsidies , and regulations all favour authoritarian business . there is no democracy in business . it is currently structured in an authoritarian manner and this damages our freedoms and it hinders the spread of liberty . i also appreciate many of the similarities between @@right and left wing libertarians## and i think we have more in common than most would have us believe . we may not agree on how to structure our society in terms of positive rights for individuals health , education , welfare , etc , but we can all agree that the system we have now is not fair , not free , and by including more options and removing many of the state capitalist barriers that the government props up , we can have a more free society . we can argue over the right to health and education after we have together reduced much of the undue power state capitalism has achieved .
thanks for the thoughtful reply . in terms of violence , i did not mean there was any violence taking place in individual businesses , although to ignore the violent history of labour rights in the u.s. and indeed the world is a huge mistake . there have indeed been many people killed , oppressed , and subjected to government violence in attempts to democratize the state capitalist system . reading about the labour movement 's history in the u.s. would illustrate that immediately . i agree with you about mutual labour contracts , and the employer and employee relationship being legitimate , but the major form of oppression comes from the lack of options . if you want to join a business for instance in it , the only option is to join an authoritarian run business . there are no or very few it coops , so a person wanting to apply their trade must either create their own business and absorb the value of their employee 's labour , or have their own labour value absorbed by their boss . because of all of the advantages running an authoritarian business has in the government and law , even people wanting to create a more democratic business have very little leeway to do so . tax breaks , subsidies , and regulations all favour authoritarian business . there is no democracy in business . it is currently structured in an authoritarian manner and this damages our freedoms and it hinders the spread of liberty . i also appreciate many of the similarities between @@right and left wing libertarians## and i think we have more in common than most would have us believe . we may not agree on how to structure our society in terms of positive rights for individuals health , education , welfare , etc , but we can all agree that the system we have now is not fair , not free , and by including more options and removing many of the state capitalist barriers that the government props up , we can have a more free society . we can argue over the right to health and education after we have together reduced much of the undue power state capitalism has achieved .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "thanks", "for", "the", "thoughtful", "reply", ".", "in", "terms", "of", "violence", ",", "i", "did", "not", "mean", "there", "was", "any", "violence", "taking", "place", "in", "individual", "businesses", ",", "although", "to", "ignore", "the", "violent", "history", "of", "labour", "rights", "in", "the", "u.s.", "and", "indeed", "the", "world", "is", "a", "huge", "mistake", ".", "there", "have", "indeed", "been", "many", "people", "killed", ",", "oppressed", ",", "and", "subjected", "to", "government", "violence", "in", "attempts", "to", "democratize", "the", "state", "capitalist", "system", ".", "reading", "about", "the", "labour", "movement", "'s", "history", "in", "the", "u.s.", "would", "illustrate", "that", "immediately", ".", "i", "agree", "with", "you", "about", "mutual", "labour", "contracts", ",", "and", "the", "employer", "and", "employee", "relationship", "being", "legitimate", ",", "but", "the", "major", "form", "of", "oppression", "comes", "from", "the", "lack", "of", "options", ".", "if", "you", "want", "to", "join", "a", "business", "for", "instance", "in", "it", ",", "the", "only", "option", "is", "to", "join", "an", "authoritarian", "run", "business", ".", "there", "are", "no", "or", "very", "few", "it", "coops", ",", "so", "a", "person", "wanting", "to", "apply", "their", "trade", "must", "either", "create", "their", "own", "business", "and", "absorb", "the", "value", "of", "their", "employee", "'s", "labour", ",", "or", "have", "their", "own", "labour", "value", "absorbed", "by", "their", "boss", ".", "because", "of", "all", "of", "the", "advantages", "running", "an", "authoritarian", "business", "has", "in", "the", "government", "and", "law", ",", "even", "people", "wanting", "to", "create", "a", "more", "democratic", "business", "have", "very", "little", "leeway", "to", "do", "so", ".", "tax", "breaks", ",", "subsidies", ",", "and", "regulations", "all", "favour", "authoritarian", "business", ".", "there", "is", "no", "democracy", "in", "business", ".", "it", "is", "currently", "structured", "in", "an", "authoritarian", "manner", "and", "this", "damages", "our", "freedoms", "and", "it", "hinders", "the", "spread", "of", "liberty", ".", "i", "also", "appreciate", "many", "of", "the", "similarities", "between", "right", "and", "left", "wing", "libertarians", "and", "i", "think", "we", "have", "more", "in", "common", "than", "most", "would", "have", "us", "believe", ".", "we", "may", "not", "agree", "on", "how", "to", "structure", "our", "society", "in", "terms", "of", "positive", "rights", "for", "individuals", "health", ",", "education", ",", "welfare", ",", "etc", ",", "but", "we", "can", "all", "agree", "that", "the", "system", "we", "have", "now", "is", "not", "fair", ",", "not", "free", ",", "and", "by", "including", "more", "options", "and", "removing", "many", "of", "the", "state", "capitalist", "barriers", "that", "the", "government", "props", "up", ",", "we", "can", "have", "a", "more", "free", "society", ".", "we", "can", "argue", "over", "the", "right", "to", "health", "and", "education", "after", "we", "have", "together", "reduced", "much", "of", "the", "undue", "power", "state", "capitalism", "has", "achieved", "." ]
i 'm sure all of the statistics point to curfew laws being successful . no shit . less people allowed '' out of their homes and into the public means less crimes . i get that it 's aimed at teenagers , but is the blatant removal of basic liberties worth the slight decrease in crime ? hell no . this is one of the worst examples of government control over their subjects imaginable . these things start in dangerous cities where people feel it is needed . then after a few successful examples , everyone will cite low sample size statistics and it will be coming to a theater near you !
cjn0vn0
Libertarian
2,014
i 'm sure all of the statistics point to curfew laws being successful . no shit . less people allowed '' out of their homes and into the public means less crimes . i get that it 's aimed at @@teenagers## , but is the blatant removal of basic liberties worth the slight decrease in crime ? hell no . this is one of the worst examples of government control over their subjects imaginable . these things start in dangerous cities where people feel it is needed . then after a few successful examples , everyone will cite low sample size statistics and it will be coming to a theater near you !
i 'm sure all of the statistics point to curfew laws being successful . no shit . less people allowed '' out of their homes and into the public means less crimes . i get that it 's aimed at @@teenagers## , but is the blatant removal of basic liberties worth the slight decrease in crime ? hell no . this is one of the worst examples of government control over their subjects imaginable . these things start in dangerous cities where people feel it is needed . then after a few successful examples , everyone will cite low sample size statistics and it will be coming to a theater near you !
i 'm sure all of the statistics point to curfew laws being successful . no shit . less people allowed '' out of their homes and into the public means less crimes . i get that it 's aimed at @@teenagers## , but is the blatant removal of basic liberties worth the slight decrease in crime ? hell no . this is one of the worst examples of government control over their subjects imaginable . these things start in dangerous cities where people feel it is needed . then after a few successful examples , everyone will cite low sample size statistics and it will be coming to a theater near you !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "sure", "all", "of", "the", "statistics", "point", "to", "curfew", "laws", "being", "successful", ".", "no", "shit", ".", "less", "people", "allowed", "``", "out", "of", "their", "homes", "and", "into", "the", "public", "means", "less", "crimes", ".", "i", "get", "that", "it", "'s", "aimed", "at", "teenagers", ",", "but", "is", "the", "blatant", "removal", "of", "basic", "liberties", "worth", "the", "slight", "decrease", "in", "crime", "?", "hell", "no", ".", "this", "is", "one", "of", "the", "worst", "examples", "of", "government", "control", "over", "their", "subjects", "imaginable", ".", "these", "things", "start", "in", "dangerous", "cities", "where", "people", "feel", "it", "is", "needed", ".", "then", "after", "a", "few", "successful", "examples", ",", "everyone", "will", "cite", "low", "sample", "size", "statistics", "and", "it", "will", "be", "coming", "to", "a", "theater", "near", "you", "!" ]
policies are far too often judged by their intentions , not their outcomes the road to hell is paved with good intentions . also , gawd , thomas sowell is brilliant .
cgz97p2
Libertarian
2,014
policies are far too often judged by their intentions , not their outcomes the road to hell is paved with good intentions . also , gawd , thomas sowell is brilliant .
policies are far too often judged by their intentions , not their outcomes the road to hell is paved with good intentions . also , gawd , thomas sowell is brilliant .
policies are far too often judged by their intentions , not their outcomes the road to hell is paved with good intentions . also , gawd , thomas sowell is brilliant .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "policies", "are", "far", "too", "often", "judged", "by", "their", "intentions", ",", "not", "their", "outcomes", "the", "road", "to", "hell", "is", "paved", "with", "good", "intentions", ".", "also", ",", "gawd", ",", "thomas", "sowell", "is", "brilliant", "." ]
and do n't forget , ... executive order 6102 is a united states presidential executive order signed on april 5 , 1933 , by president franklin d. roosevelt forbidding the hoarding of gold coin , gold bullion , and gold certificates within the continental united states '' . the order criminalized the possession of monetary gold by any individual , partnership , association or corporation .
cko3ndb
Libertarian
2,014
and do n't forget , ... executive order 6102 is a united states presidential executive order signed on april 5 , 1933 , by president franklin d. roosevelt forbidding the hoarding of gold coin , gold bullion , and gold certificates within the continental united states '' . the order criminalized the possession of monetary gold by any individual , partnership , association or corporation .
and do n't forget , ... executive order 6102 is a united states presidential executive order signed on april 5 , 1933 , by president franklin d. roosevelt forbidding the hoarding of gold coin , gold bullion , and gold certificates within the continental united states '' . the order criminalized the possession of monetary gold by any individual , partnership , association or corporation .
and do n't forget , ... executive order 6102 is a united states presidential executive order signed on april 5 , 1933 , by president franklin d. roosevelt forbidding the hoarding of gold coin , gold bullion , and gold certificates within the continental united states '' . the order criminalized the possession of monetary gold by any individual , partnership , association or corporation .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "do", "n't", "forget", ",", "...", "executive", "order", "6102", "is", "a", "united", "states", "presidential", "executive", "order", "signed", "on", "april", "5", ",", "1933", ",", "by", "president", "franklin", "d.", "roosevelt", "forbidding", "the", "hoarding", "of", "gold", "coin", ",", "gold", "bullion", ",", "and", "gold", "certificates", "within", "the", "continental", "united", "states", "``", ".", "the", "order", "criminalized", "the", "possession", "of", "monetary", "gold", "by", "any", "individual", ",", "partnership", ",", "association", "or", "corporation", "." ]
hahaha your idea of libertarianism is a recipe for failure if you expect people to just take it up the ass and blame the government '' for problems caused by other individuals . i am not responsible for what the government does . you 're starting to remind me of that white lady who went down to haiti , was raped by a savage piece of shit , then said the rape was not his fault , but the fault of white racism '' . absolutely and utterly preposterous . take your slave morality and shove it up your ass .
civgxst
Libertarian
2,014
hahaha your idea of libertarianism is a recipe for failure if you expect people to just take it up the ass and blame the government '' for problems caused by other individuals . i am not responsible for what the government does . you 're starting to remind me of that white lady who went down to haiti , was raped by a savage piece of shit , then said the rape was not his fault , but the fault of white racism '' . absolutely and utterly preposterous . take your slave morality and shove it up your ass .
hahaha your idea of libertarianism is a recipe for failure if you expect people to just take it up the ass and blame the government '' for problems caused by other individuals . i am not responsible for what the government does . you 're starting to remind me of that white lady who went down to haiti , was raped by a savage piece of shit , then said the rape was not his fault , but the fault of white racism '' . absolutely and utterly preposterous . take your slave morality and shove it up your ass .
hahaha your idea of libertarianism is a recipe for failure if you expect people to just take it up the ass and blame the government '' for problems caused by other individuals . i am not responsible for what the government does . you 're starting to remind me of that white lady who went down to haiti , was raped by a savage piece of shit , then said the rape was not his fault , but the fault of white racism '' . absolutely and utterly preposterous . take your slave morality and shove it up your ass .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "hahaha", "your", "idea", "of", "libertarianism", "is", "a", "recipe", "for", "failure", "if", "you", "expect", "people", "to", "just", "take", "it", "up", "the", "ass", "and", "blame", "the", "government", "``", "for", "problems", "caused", "by", "other", "individuals", ".", "i", "am", "not", "responsible", "for", "what", "the", "government", "does", ".", "you", "'re", "starting", "to", "remind", "me", "of", "that", "white", "lady", "who", "went", "down", "to", "haiti", ",", "was", "raped", "by", "a", "savage", "piece", "of", "shit", ",", "then", "said", "the", "rape", "was", "not", "his", "fault", ",", "but", "the", "fault", "of", "white", "racism", "``", ".", "absolutely", "and", "utterly", "preposterous", ".", "take", "your", "slave", "morality", "and", "shove", "it", "up", "your", "ass", "." ]
if the pizza delivery guy in north carolina keeps the senate in democrat control thereby preventing ron paul 's audit the fed bill from being passed , the motto should be , party before policy '' or cut off the nose to spite the face ''
clg071s
Libertarian
2,014
if the pizza delivery guy in north carolina keeps @@the senate## in democrat control thereby preventing ron paul 's audit the fed bill from being passed , the motto should be , party before policy '' or cut off the nose to spite the face ''
if the pizza delivery guy in north carolina keeps @@the senate## in democrat control thereby preventing ron paul 's audit the fed bill from being passed , the motto should be , party before policy '' or cut off the nose to spite the face ''
if the pizza delivery guy in north carolina keeps @@the senate## in democrat control thereby preventing ron paul 's audit the fed bill from being passed , the motto should be , party before policy '' or cut off the nose to spite the face ''
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "if", "the", "pizza", "delivery", "guy", "in", "north", "carolina", "keeps", "the", "senate", "in", "democrat", "control", "thereby", "preventing", "ron", "paul", "'s", "audit", "the", "fed", "bill", "from", "being", "passed", ",", "the", "motto", "should", "be", ",", "party", "before", "policy", "``", "or", "cut", "off", "the", "nose", "to", "spite", "the", "face", "``" ]
this place is not really libertarian , that 's just the name of the sub .
cfqfikh
Libertarian
2,014
this place is not really libertarian , that 's just the name of the sub .
this place is not really libertarian , that 's just the name of the sub .
this place is not really libertarian , that 's just the name of the sub .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "place", "is", "not", "really", "libertarian", ",", "that", "'s", "just", "the", "name", "of", "the", "sub", "." ]
right of course . but then he ran . perhaps you have n't been following the news on this . police initially in what in retrospect , is an obvious lie claimed that brown died 35 feet from the suv , but now acknowledge what people in the community have been saying all along that he was much , much further at least 150 feet URL . so , if he charged , that means he ran further than 150 feet , then turned around and charged back . wut '' is right .
cmgpr5n
Libertarian
2,014
right of course . but then he ran . perhaps you have n't been following the news on this . police initially in what in retrospect , is an obvious lie claimed that brown died 35 feet from the suv , but now acknowledge what people in the community have been saying all along that he was much , much further at least 150 feet URL . so , if he charged , that means he ran further than 150 feet , then turned around and charged back . wut '' is right .
right of course . but then he ran . perhaps you have n't been following the news on this . police initially in what in retrospect , is an obvious lie claimed that brown died 35 feet from the suv , but now acknowledge what @@people in the community## have been saying all along that he was much , much further at least 150 feet URL . so , if he charged , that means he ran further than 150 feet , then turned around and charged back . wut '' is right .
right of course . but then he ran . perhaps you have n't been following the news on this . police initially in what in retrospect , is an obvious lie claimed that brown died 35 feet from the suv , but now acknowledge what @@people in the community## have been saying all along that he was much , much further at least 150 feet URL . so , if he charged , that means he ran further than 150 feet , then turned around and charged back . wut '' is right .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "right", "of", "course", ".", "but", "then", "he", "ran", ".", "perhaps", "you", "have", "n't", "been", "following", "the", "news", "on", "this", ".", "police", "initially", "in", "what", "in", "retrospect", ",", "is", "an", "obvious", "lie", "claimed", "that", "brown", "died", "35", "feet", "from", "the", "suv", ",", "but", "now", "acknowledge", "what", "people", "in", "the", "community", "have", "been", "saying", "all", "along", "that", "he", "was", "much", ",", "much", "further", "at", "least", "150", "feet", "URL", ".", "so", ",", "if", "he", "charged", ",", "that", "means", "he", "ran", "further", "than", "150", "feet", ",", "then", "turned", "around", "and", "charged", "back", ".", "wut", "``", "is", "right", "." ]
not all of them , no . this is something most people already know .
cfedn6c
Libertarian
2,014
not all of them , no . this is something most people already know .
not all of them , no . this is something most people already know .
not all of them , no . this is something most people already know .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "not", "all", "of", "them", ",", "no", ".", "this", "is", "something", "most", "people", "already", "know", "." ]
thank you for mentioning l.a. as a resident , it 's the one example i always go back to whenever this topic comes up . i went from being able to see the san gabriels a few days a year to seeing both them and catalina every day . it is a massive improvement in the aesthetic value of the city , forgetting about the obvious health benefits .
ch03i3n
Libertarian
2,014
thank you for mentioning l.a. as a resident , it 's the one example i always go back to whenever this topic comes up . i went from being able to see the san gabriels a few days a year to seeing both them and catalina every day . it is a massive improvement in the aesthetic value of the city , forgetting about the obvious health benefits .
thank you for mentioning l.a. as a resident , it 's the one example i always go back to whenever this topic comes up . i went from being able to see the san gabriels a few days a year to seeing both them and catalina every day . it is a massive improvement in the aesthetic value of the city , forgetting about the obvious health benefits .
thank you for mentioning l.a. as a resident , it 's the one example i always go back to whenever this topic comes up . i went from being able to see the san gabriels a few days a year to seeing both them and catalina every day . it is a massive improvement in the aesthetic value of the city , forgetting about the obvious health benefits .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "thank", "you", "for", "mentioning", "l.a.", "as", "a", "resident", ",", "it", "'s", "the", "one", "example", "i", "always", "go", "back", "to", "whenever", "this", "topic", "comes", "up", ".", "i", "went", "from", "being", "able", "to", "see", "the", "san", "gabriels", "a", "few", "days", "a", "year", "to", "seeing", "both", "them", "and", "catalina", "every", "day", ".", "it", "is", "a", "massive", "improvement", "in", "the", "aesthetic", "value", "of", "the", "city", ",", "forgetting", "about", "the", "obvious", "health", "benefits", "." ]
it seems like a great business move . the cvs brand is about getting medicine and wellness products . cigarettes seem very out of place . especially when you have to look at cigarettes behind the cashier every time you check out . they can now start advertizing wellness products without looking like blatant hypocrites . that and a national company dealing with cigarettes on state by state basis must be difficult to manage .
cf8jni8
Libertarian
2,014
it seems like a great business move . the cvs brand is about getting medicine and wellness products . cigarettes seem very out of place . especially when you have to look at cigarettes behind the cashier every time you check out . they can now start advertizing wellness products without looking like blatant hypocrites . that and a national company dealing with cigarettes on state by state basis must be difficult to manage .
it seems like a great business move . the cvs brand is about getting medicine and wellness products . cigarettes seem very out of place . especially when you have to look at cigarettes behind the cashier every time you check out . they can now start advertizing wellness products without looking like blatant hypocrites . that and a national company dealing with cigarettes on state by state basis must be difficult to manage .
it seems like a great business move . the cvs brand is about getting medicine and wellness products . cigarettes seem very out of place . especially when you have to look at cigarettes behind the cashier every time you check out . they can now start advertizing wellness products without looking like blatant hypocrites . that and a national company dealing with cigarettes on state by state basis must be difficult to manage .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "seems", "like", "a", "great", "business", "move", ".", "the", "cvs", "brand", "is", "about", "getting", "medicine", "and", "wellness", "products", ".", "cigarettes", "seem", "very", "out", "of", "place", ".", "especially", "when", "you", "have", "to", "look", "at", "cigarettes", "behind", "the", "cashier", "every", "time", "you", "check", "out", ".", "they", "can", "now", "start", "advertizing", "wellness", "products", "without", "looking", "like", "blatant", "hypocrites", ".", "that", "and", "a", "national", "company", "dealing", "with", "cigarettes", "on", "state", "by", "state", "basis", "must", "be", "difficult", "to", "manage", "." ]
how exactly do you propose to prevent crazy kids from bringing weapons to school ? i mean , in a practical manner , every single day . because you can not predict when crazy will strike . we have statistics that show it strikes with incredibly rare frequency given that there are fifty thousand plus schools in just the usa and millions of kids , but on any give day , no crazy . so how do you prevent those evil pricks from bringing a weapon ? i would argue that is an impossible goal . and therefore , denying kids the right to carry weapons for selfdefense against those evil pricks of the school yard is inviting tragedy when the crazy strikes .
cl9cf80
Libertarian
2,014
how exactly do you propose to prevent @@crazy kids## from bringing weapons to school ? i mean , in a practical manner , every single day . because you can not predict when crazy will strike . we have statistics that show it strikes with incredibly rare frequency given that there are fifty thousand plus schools in just the usa and millions of @@kids## , but on any give day , no crazy . so how do you prevent those evil pricks from bringing a weapon ? i would argue that is an impossible goal . and therefore , denying @@kids## the right to carry weapons for selfdefense against those evil pricks of the school yard is inviting tragedy when the crazy strikes .
how exactly do you propose to prevent @@crazy kids## from bringing weapons to school ? i mean , in a practical manner , every single day . because you can not predict when crazy will strike . we have statistics that show it strikes with incredibly rare frequency given that there are fifty thousand plus schools in just the usa and millions of @@kids## , but on any give day , no crazy . so how do you prevent those @@evil pricks## from bringing a weapon ? i would argue that is an impossible goal . and therefore , denying @@kids## the right to carry weapons for selfdefense against those @@evil pricks## of the school yard is inviting tragedy when the crazy strikes .
how exactly do you propose to prevent @@crazy kids## from bringing weapons to school ? i mean , in a practical manner , every single day . because you can not predict when crazy will strike . we have statistics that show it strikes with incredibly rare frequency given that there are fifty thousand plus schools in just the usa and millions of @@kids## , but on any give day , no crazy . so how do you prevent those @@evil pricks## from bringing a weapon ? i would argue that is an impossible goal . and therefore , denying @@kids## the right to carry weapons for selfdefense against those @@evil pricks## of the school yard is inviting tragedy when the crazy strikes .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "how", "exactly", "do", "you", "propose", "to", "prevent", "crazy", "kids", "from", "bringing", "weapons", "to", "school", "?", "i", "mean", ",", "in", "a", "practical", "manner", ",", "every", "single", "day", ".", "because", "you", "can", "not", "predict", "when", "crazy", "will", "strike", ".", "we", "have", "statistics", "that", "show", "it", "strikes", "with", "incredibly", "rare", "frequency", "given", "that", "there", "are", "fifty", "thousand", "plus", "schools", "in", "just", "the", "usa", "and", "millions", "of", "kids", ",", "but", "on", "any", "give", "day", ",", "no", "crazy", ".", "so", "how", "do", "you", "prevent", "those", "evil", "pricks", "from", "bringing", "a", "weapon", "?", "i", "would", "argue", "that", "is", "an", "impossible", "goal", ".", "and", "therefore", ",", "denying", "kids", "the", "right", "to", "carry", "weapons", "for", "selfdefense", "against", "those", "evil", "pricks", "of", "the", "school", "yard", "is", "inviting", "tragedy", "when", "the", "crazy", "strikes", "." ]
and knowing the value of my car prestolen is n't a non sequitur ? what does it have to do with your hypothetical 50k tow job by a hypothetical company ?
cm8yvvx
Libertarian
2,014
and knowing the value of my car prestolen is n't a non sequitur ? what does it have to do with your hypothetical 50k tow job by a hypothetical company ?
and knowing the value of my car prestolen is n't a non sequitur ? what does it have to do with your hypothetical 50k tow job by a hypothetical company ?
and knowing the value of my car prestolen is n't a non sequitur ? what does it have to do with your hypothetical 50k tow job by a hypothetical company ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "knowing", "the", "value", "of", "my", "car", "prestolen", "is", "n't", "a", "non", "sequitur", "?", "what", "does", "it", "have", "to", "do", "with", "your", "hypothetical", "50k", "tow", "job", "by", "a", "hypothetical", "company", "?" ]
there are lots of obvious problems with nuking isis from space nonproliferation treaty , not knowing where to send the nukes , etc . i was hoping someone could tell me the downsides to the invasion of mexico now i 'm more interested in the problems behind unifying north america excluding canada . things like whether they have any allies who would be willing to step in to fight the usa , if they have chemical weapons , etc .
clauec6
Libertarian
2,014
there are lots of obvious problems with nuking @@isis## from space nonproliferation treaty , not knowing where to send the nukes , etc . i was hoping someone could tell me the downsides to the invasion of mexico now i 'm more interested in the problems behind unifying north america excluding canada . things like whether they have any allies who would be willing to step in to fight the usa , if they have chemical weapons , etc .
there are lots of obvious problems with nuking @@isis## from space nonproliferation treaty , not knowing where to send the nukes , etc . i was hoping someone could tell me the downsides to the invasion of @@mexico## now i 'm more interested in the problems behind unifying @@north america## excluding @@canada## . things like whether they have any @@allies## who would be willing to step in to fight @@the usa## , if they have chemical weapons , etc .
there are lots of obvious problems with nuking @@isis## from space nonproliferation treaty , not knowing where to send the nukes , etc . i was hoping someone could tell me the downsides to the invasion of @@mexico## now i 'm more interested in the problems behind unifying @@north america## excluding @@canada## . things like whether they have any @@allies## who would be willing to step in to fight @@the usa## , if they have chemical weapons , etc .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "there", "are", "lots", "of", "obvious", "problems", "with", "nuking", "isis", "from", "space", "nonproliferation", "treaty", ",", "not", "knowing", "where", "to", "send", "the", "nukes", ",", "etc", ".", "i", "was", "hoping", "someone", "could", "tell", "me", "the", "downsides", "to", "the", "invasion", "of", "mexico", "now", "i", "'m", "more", "interested", "in", "the", "problems", "behind", "unifying", "north", "america", "excluding", "canada", ".", "things", "like", "whether", "they", "have", "any", "allies", "who", "would", "be", "willing", "to", "step", "in", "to", "fight", "the", "usa", ",", "if", "they", "have", "chemical", "weapons", ",", "etc", "." ]
i 'm not sure how big a victory this is , because the left acknowledges that the soviets were fucked up . they just ca n't fathom that their socialism could have any relation to that of stalin .
cucysrc
Libertarian
2,015
i 'm not sure how big a victory this is , because the left acknowledges that the soviets were fucked up . they just ca n't fathom that their socialism could have any relation to that of stalin .
i 'm not sure how big a victory this is , because @@the left## acknowledges that the @@soviets## were fucked up . they just ca n't fathom that their socialism could have any relation to that of stalin .
i 'm not sure how big a victory this is , because @@the left## acknowledges that the @@soviets## were fucked up . they just ca n't fathom that their socialism could have any relation to that of stalin .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "'m", "not", "sure", "how", "big", "a", "victory", "this", "is", ",", "because", "the", "left", "acknowledges", "that", "the", "soviets", "were", "fucked", "up", ".", "they", "just", "ca", "n't", "fathom", "that", "their", "socialism", "could", "have", "any", "relation", "to", "that", "of", "stalin", "." ]
again you write a wall of text . but again the problem is that you are basing your argument on a false premise that it is a minority view that think minimum wage laws have no effect on employment . look at the title btw . talk about common tactics the title refers to employment , yet you and your author switch to a discussion of earnings as you have do n't have a leg to stand on when it comes to drawing any new conclusions regarding employment . so again URL look how many studiesmeta studies from people who are well renowned in their field ca n't find this supposed lost employment connection . now i know u wo n't be dissuaded from your views , but just know u lost your dick measuring contest about leftleaners '' not knowing evidence that they cite . my side of the argument if you could even call it an argument at this point has a robust empirical foundation , refined over decades , that has really failed to be seriously undermined by freshwaterURL leaning ideologues . apologies if you do n't like my tone but i am not going to sit here , watch you try to pull the wool over peoples eyes , and listen to someone preach that 114 just because it suits their worldview .
co408ik
Libertarian
2,015
again you write a wall of text . but again the problem is that you are basing your argument on a false premise that it is a minority view that think minimum wage laws have no effect on employment . look at the title btw . talk about common tactics the title refers to employment , yet you and your author switch to a discussion of earnings as you have do n't have a leg to stand on when it comes to drawing any new conclusions regarding employment . so again URL look how many studiesmeta studies from people who are well renowned in their field ca n't find this supposed lost employment connection . now i know u wo n't be dissuaded from your views , but just know u lost your dick measuring contest about @@leftleaners## '' not knowing evidence that they cite . my side of the argument if you could even call it an argument at this point has a robust empirical foundation , refined over decades , that has really failed to be seriously undermined by freshwaterURL leaning ideologues . apologies if you do n't like my tone but i am not going to sit here , watch you try to pull the wool over peoples eyes , and listen to someone preach that 114 just because it suits their worldview .
again you write a wall of text . but again the problem is that you are basing your argument on a false premise that it is a minority view that think minimum wage laws have no effect on employment . look at the title btw . talk about common tactics the title refers to employment , yet you and your author switch to a discussion of earnings as you have do n't have a leg to stand on when it comes to drawing any new conclusions regarding employment . so again URL look how many studiesmeta studies from @@people who are well renowned in their field## ca n't find this supposed lost employment connection . now i know u wo n't be dissuaded from your views , but just know u lost your dick measuring contest about @@leftleaners## '' not knowing evidence that they cite . my side of the argument if you could even call it an argument at this point has a robust empirical foundation , refined over decades , that has really failed to be seriously undermined by freshwaterURL leaning ideologues . apologies if you do n't like my tone but i am not going to sit here , watch you try to pull the wool over peoples eyes , and listen to someone preach that 114 just because it suits their worldview .
again you write a wall of text . but again the problem is that you are basing your argument on a false premise that it is a minority view that think minimum wage laws have no effect on employment . look at the title btw . talk about common tactics the title refers to employment , yet you and your author switch to a discussion of earnings as you have do n't have a leg to stand on when it comes to drawing any new conclusions regarding employment . so again URL look how many studiesmeta studies from @@people who are well renowned in their field## ca n't find this supposed lost employment connection . now i know u wo n't be dissuaded from your views , but just know u lost your dick measuring contest about @@leftleaners## '' not knowing evidence that they cite . my side of the argument if you could even call it an argument at this point has a robust empirical foundation , refined over decades , that has really failed to be seriously undermined by freshwaterURL leaning ideologues . apologies if you do n't like my tone but i am not going to sit here , watch you try to pull the wool over peoples eyes , and listen to someone preach that 114 just because it suits their worldview .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "again", "you", "write", "a", "wall", "of", "text", ".", "but", "again", "the", "problem", "is", "that", "you", "are", "basing", "your", "argument", "on", "a", "false", "premise", "that", "it", "is", "a", "minority", "view", "that", "think", "minimum", "wage", "laws", "have", "no", "effect", "on", "employment", ".", "look", "at", "the", "title", "btw", ".", "talk", "about", "common", "tactics", "the", "title", "refers", "to", "employment", ",", "yet", "you", "and", "your", "author", "switch", "to", "a", "discussion", "of", "earnings", "as", "you", "have", "do", "n't", "have", "a", "leg", "to", "stand", "on", "when", "it", "comes", "to", "drawing", "any", "new", "conclusions", "regarding", "employment", ".", "so", "again", "URL", "look", "how", "many", "studiesmeta", "studies", "from", "people", "who", "are", "well", "renowned", "in", "their", "field", "ca", "n't", "find", "this", "supposed", "lost", "employment", "connection", ".", "now", "i", "know", "u", "wo", "n't", "be", "dissuaded", "from", "your", "views", ",", "but", "just", "know", "u", "lost", "your", "dick", "measuring", "contest", "about", "leftleaners", "``", "not", "knowing", "evidence", "that", "they", "cite", ".", "my", "side", "of", "the", "argument", "if", "you", "could", "even", "call", "it", "an", "argument", "at", "this", "point", "has", "a", "robust", "empirical", "foundation", ",", "refined", "over", "decades", ",", "that", "has", "really", "failed", "to", "be", "seriously", "undermined", "by", "freshwaterURL", "leaning", "ideologues", ".", "apologies", "if", "you", "do", "n't", "like", "my", "tone", "but", "i", "am", "not", "going", "to", "sit", "here", ",", "watch", "you", "try", "to", "pull", "the", "wool", "over", "peoples", "eyes", ",", "and", "listen", "to", "someone", "preach", "that", "114", "just", "because", "it", "suits", "their", "worldview", "." ]
this is the best tl dr i could make , original URL reduced by 96 . i 'm a bot explaining the policy , baltimore 039 s mayor proclaimed , quot blacks should be quarantined in isolated slums in order to reduce the incidence of civil disturbance , to prevent the spread of communicable disease into the nearby white neighborhoods , and to protect property values among the white majority . '' white institutions created it , white institutions maintain it , and white society condones it . nationwide , black family incomes are now about 60 percent of white family incomes , but black household wealth is only about 5 percent of white household wealth . extended summary URL faq URL version 1.5 , 13766 tl drs so far . '' theory URL feedback URL pms and comment replies are read by the bot admin , constructive feedback is welcome . '' top five keywords white 1 black 2 baltimore 3 neighborhood 4 american 5 post found in SUBREDDIT URL , SUBREDDIT URL and SUBREDDIT URL .
cqua27y
Libertarian
2,015
this is the best tl dr i could make , original URL reduced by 96 . i 'm a bot explaining the policy , baltimore 039 s mayor proclaimed , quot @@blacks## should be quarantined in isolated slums in order to reduce the incidence of civil disturbance , to prevent the spread of communicable disease into the nearby white neighborhoods , and to protect property values among @@the white majority## . '' white institutions created it , white institutions maintain it , and @@white society## condones it . nationwide , black family incomes are now about 60 percent of white family incomes , but black household wealth is only about 5 percent of white household wealth . extended summary URL faq URL version 1.5 , 13766 tl drs so far . '' theory URL feedback URL pms and comment replies are read by the bot admin , constructive feedback is welcome . '' top five keywords white 1 black 2 baltimore 3 neighborhood 4 american 5 post found in SUBREDDIT URL , SUBREDDIT URL and SUBREDDIT URL .
this is the best tl dr i could make , original URL reduced by 96 . i 'm a bot explaining the policy , baltimore 039 s mayor proclaimed , @@quot blacks## should be quarantined in isolated slums in order to reduce the incidence of civil disturbance , to prevent the spread of communicable disease into the nearby @@white neighborhoods## , and to protect property values among the @@white majority## . '' @@white institutions## created it , @@white institutions## maintain it , and white society condones it . nationwide , black family incomes are now about 60 percent of white family incomes , but black household wealth is only about 5 percent of white household wealth . extended summary URL faq URL version 1.5 , 13766 tl drs so far . '' theory URL feedback URL pms and comment replies are read by the bot admin , constructive feedback is welcome . '' top five keywords white 1 black 2 baltimore 3 neighborhood 4 american 5 post found in SUBREDDIT URL , SUBREDDIT URL and SUBREDDIT URL .
this is the best tl dr i could make , original URL reduced by 96 . i 'm a bot explaining the policy , baltimore 039 s mayor proclaimed , @@quot blacks## should be quarantined in isolated slums in order to reduce the incidence of civil disturbance , to prevent the spread of communicable disease into the nearby @@white neighborhoods## , and to protect property values among the @@white majority## . '' @@white institutions## created it , @@white institutions## maintain it , and @@white society## condones it . nationwide , black family incomes are now about 60 percent of white family incomes , but black household wealth is only about 5 percent of white household wealth . extended summary URL faq URL version 1.5 , 13766 tl drs so far . '' theory URL feedback URL pms and comment replies are read by the bot admin , constructive feedback is welcome . '' top five keywords white 1 black 2 baltimore 3 neighborhood 4 american 5 post found in SUBREDDIT URL , SUBREDDIT URL and SUBREDDIT URL .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "this", "is", "the", "best", "tl", "dr", "i", "could", "make", ",", "original", "URL", "reduced", "by", "96", ".", "i", "'m", "a", "bot", "explaining", "the", "policy", ",", "baltimore", "039", "s", "mayor", "proclaimed", ",", "quot", "blacks", "should", "be", "quarantined", "in", "isolated", "slums", "in", "order", "to", "reduce", "the", "incidence", "of", "civil", "disturbance", ",", "to", "prevent", "the", "spread", "of", "communicable", "disease", "into", "the", "nearby", "white", "neighborhoods", ",", "and", "to", "protect", "property", "values", "among", "the", "white", "majority", ".", "``", "white", "institutions", "created", "it", ",", "white", "institutions", "maintain", "it", ",", "and", "white", "society", "condones", "it", ".", "nationwide", ",", "black", "family", "incomes", "are", "now", "about", "60", "percent", "of", "white", "family", "incomes", ",", "but", "black", "household", "wealth", "is", "only", "about", "5", "percent", "of", "white", "household", "wealth", ".", "extended", "summary", "URL", "faq", "URL", "version", "1.5", ",", "13766", "tl", "drs", "so", "far", ".", "``", "theory", "URL", "feedback", "URL", "pms", "and", "comment", "replies", "are", "read", "by", "the", "bot", "admin", ",", "constructive", "feedback", "is", "welcome", ".", "``", "top", "five", "keywords", "white", "1", "black", "2", "baltimore", "3", "neighborhood", "4", "american", "5", "post", "found", "in", "SUBREDDIT", "URL", ",", "SUBREDDIT", "URL", "and", "SUBREDDIT", "URL", "." ]
i have a theory that the rank and file democrat is afraid of the candidates that become viable if clinton goes down in flames . biden , for instance . they are propping her up because the alternative is unthinkable .
cu2tkdn
Libertarian
2,015
i have a theory that the rank and file democrat is afraid of the candidates that become viable if clinton goes down in flames . biden , for instance . they are propping her up because the alternative is unthinkable .
i have a theory that the rank and file democrat is afraid of the @@candidates## that become viable if clinton goes down in flames . biden , for instance . they are propping her up because the alternative is unthinkable .
i have a theory that the rank and file democrat is afraid of the @@candidates## that become viable if clinton goes down in flames . biden , for instance . they are propping her up because the alternative is unthinkable .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "have", "a", "theory", "that", "the", "rank", "and", "file", "democrat", "is", "afraid", "of", "the", "candidates", "that", "become", "viable", "if", "clinton", "goes", "down", "in", "flames", ".", "biden", ",", "for", "instance", ".", "they", "are", "propping", "her", "up", "because", "the", "alternative", "is", "unthinkable", "." ]
i ca n't wait until jeb loses to hillary . i bet you ca n't , either .
cqz1lqs
Libertarian
2,015
i ca n't wait until jeb loses to hillary . i bet you ca n't , either .
i ca n't wait until jeb loses to hillary . i bet you ca n't , either .
i ca n't wait until jeb loses to hillary . i bet you ca n't , either .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "ca", "n't", "wait", "until", "jeb", "loses", "to", "hillary", ".", "i", "bet", "you", "ca", "n't", ",", "either", "." ]
open to the public '' is such a bad phrase . if i sold widgets out of my living room , would that make my living room public property ? '' this bizarre line of thought blurs the line between public and private .
co8jn8i
Libertarian
2,015
open to the public '' is such a bad phrase . if i sold widgets out of my living room , would that make my living room public property ? '' this bizarre line of thought blurs the line between public and private .
open to the public '' is such a bad phrase . if i sold widgets out of my living room , would that make my living room public property ? '' this bizarre line of thought blurs the line between public and private .
open to the public '' is such a bad phrase . if i sold widgets out of my living room , would that make my living room public property ? '' this bizarre line of thought blurs the line between public and private .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "open", "to", "the", "public", "``", "is", "such", "a", "bad", "phrase", ".", "if", "i", "sold", "widgets", "out", "of", "my", "living", "room", ",", "would", "that", "make", "my", "living", "room", "public", "property", "?", "``", "this", "bizarre", "line", "of", "thought", "blurs", "the", "line", "between", "public", "and", "private", "." ]
you do n't get one without the other .
crq005q
Libertarian
2,015
you do n't get one without the other .
you do n't get one without the other .
you do n't get one without the other .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "do", "n't", "get", "one", "without", "the", "other", "." ]
edward snowden does n't have a bunchalotta confirmed kills , though . how are we supposed to venerate someone that has n't ventilated anyone else ?
cob0t7n
Libertarian
2,015
edward snowden does n't have a bunchalotta confirmed kills , though . how are we supposed to venerate someone that has n't ventilated anyone else ?
edward snowden does n't have a bunchalotta confirmed kills , though . how are we supposed to venerate someone that has n't ventilated anyone else ?
edward snowden does n't have a bunchalotta confirmed kills , though . how are we supposed to venerate someone that has n't ventilated anyone else ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "edward", "snowden", "does", "n't", "have", "a", "bunchalotta", "confirmed", "kills", ",", "though", ".", "how", "are", "we", "supposed", "to", "venerate", "someone", "that", "has", "n't", "ventilated", "anyone", "else", "?" ]
knowing and observing facts is the opposite of ignorance , actually
cqnqfys
Libertarian
2,015
knowing and observing facts is the opposite of ignorance , actually
knowing and observing facts is the opposite of ignorance , actually
knowing and observing facts is the opposite of ignorance , actually
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "knowing", "and", "observing", "facts", "is", "the", "opposite", "of", "ignorance", ",", "actually" ]
i seem to find libertarians quite divided on this issue . why some people think that all libertarians have to agree on it is beyond me .
cviq4sc
Libertarian
2,015
i seem to find @@libertarians## quite divided on this issue . why some people think that all @@libertarians## have to agree on it is beyond me .
i seem to find @@libertarians## quite divided on this issue . why some people think that all @@libertarians## have to agree on it is beyond me .
i seem to find @@libertarians## quite divided on this issue . why some people think that all @@libertarians## have to agree on it is beyond me .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "seem", "to", "find", "libertarians", "quite", "divided", "on", "this", "issue", ".", "why", "some", "people", "think", "that", "all", "libertarians", "have", "to", "agree", "on", "it", "is", "beyond", "me", "." ]
julian heicklen via truthout.org article URL
ctq6fxe
Libertarian
2,015
julian heicklen via truthout.org article URL
julian heicklen via truthout.org article URL
julian heicklen via truthout.org article URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "julian", "heicklen", "via", "truthout.org", "article", "URL" ]
why ? because he ca n't body surf ? libertarians always run baffoons
ct4bv1f
Libertarian
2,015
why ? because he ca n't body surf ? @@libertarians## always run baffoons
why ? because he ca n't body surf ? @@libertarians## always run baffoons
why ? because he ca n't body surf ? @@libertarians## always run baffoons
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "why", "?", "because", "he", "ca", "n't", "body", "surf", "?", "libertarians", "always", "run", "baffoons" ]
but it is a fairly well documented that all types of gun violence in general has gone down since 1996 in australia . according to the australian institute of criminology URL table 1 crime has been intensifying since sanctioning a ban on private firearm ownership . in the first couple years after australian firearmowners were forced to give up more than 640,000 personal firearms , government stats exhibited a dramatic increase in criminal activity . in 20012002 , murders were up another 20 . an australian study URL that spanned over a decade has concluded that the seizure of firearms had no effect on rates of criminal activity . on the same note a separate report also concluded that australia s 1996 gun control laws found no evidence for an impact of the laws on the preexisting decline in firearm homicides URL despite having harsher gun control laws than new zealand including a near ban on handguns firearm homicides in both countries track one another over 25 years , indicating that gun control is not a control variable URL .
cvnkdye
Libertarian
2,015
but it is a fairly well documented that all types of gun violence in general has gone down since 1996 in australia . according to the australian institute of criminology URL table 1 crime has been intensifying since sanctioning a ban on private firearm ownership . in the first couple years after @@australian firearmowners## were forced to give up more than 640,000 personal firearms , government stats exhibited a dramatic increase in criminal activity . in 20012002 , murders were up another 20 . an australian study URL that spanned over a decade has concluded that the seizure of firearms had no effect on rates of criminal activity . on the same note a separate report also concluded that australia s 1996 gun control laws found no evidence for an impact of the laws on the preexisting decline in firearm homicides URL despite having harsher gun control laws than new zealand including a near ban on handguns firearm homicides in both countries track one another over 25 years , indicating that gun control is not a control variable URL .
but it is a fairly well documented that all types of gun violence in general has gone down since 1996 in australia . according to the @@australian institute of criminology## URL table 1 crime has been intensifying since sanctioning a ban on @@private firearm ownership## . in the first couple years after @@australian firearmowners## were forced to give up more than 640,000 personal firearms , government stats exhibited a dramatic increase in criminal activity . in 20012002 , murders were up another 20 . an australian study URL that spanned over a decade has concluded that the seizure of firearms had no effect on rates of criminal activity . on the same note a separate report also concluded that @@australia s## 1996 gun control laws found no evidence for an impact of the laws on the preexisting decline in firearm homicides URL despite having harsher gun control laws than @@new zealand## including a near ban on handguns firearm homicides in both countries track one another over 25 years , indicating that gun control is not a control variable URL .
but it is a fairly well documented that all types of gun violence in general has gone down since 1996 in australia . according to the @@australian institute of criminology## URL table 1 crime has been intensifying since sanctioning a ban on @@private firearm ownership## . in the first couple years after @@australian firearmowners## were forced to give up more than 640,000 personal firearms , government stats exhibited a dramatic increase in criminal activity . in 20012002 , murders were up another 20 . an australian study URL that spanned over a decade has concluded that the seizure of firearms had no effect on rates of criminal activity . on the same note a separate report also concluded that @@australia s## 1996 gun control laws found no evidence for an impact of the laws on the preexisting decline in firearm homicides URL despite having harsher gun control laws than @@new zealand## including a near ban on handguns firearm homicides in both countries track one another over 25 years , indicating that gun control is not a control variable URL .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "it", "is", "a", "fairly", "well", "documented", "that", "all", "types", "of", "gun", "violence", "in", "general", "has", "gone", "down", "since", "1996", "in", "australia", ".", "according", "to", "the", "australian", "institute", "of", "criminology", "URL", "table", "1", "crime", "has", "been", "intensifying", "since", "sanctioning", "a", "ban", "on", "private", "firearm", "ownership", ".", "in", "the", "first", "couple", "years", "after", "australian", "firearmowners", "were", "forced", "to", "give", "up", "more", "than", "640,000", "personal", "firearms", ",", "government", "stats", "exhibited", "a", "dramatic", "increase", "in", "criminal", "activity", ".", "in", "20012002", ",", "murders", "were", "up", "another", "20", ".", "an", "australian", "study", "URL", "that", "spanned", "over", "a", "decade", "has", "concluded", "that", "the", "seizure", "of", "firearms", "had", "no", "effect", "on", "rates", "of", "criminal", "activity", ".", "on", "the", "same", "note", "a", "separate", "report", "also", "concluded", "that", "australia", "s", "1996", "gun", "control", "laws", "found", "no", "evidence", "for", "an", "impact", "of", "the", "laws", "on", "the", "preexisting", "decline", "in", "firearm", "homicides", "URL", "despite", "having", "harsher", "gun", "control", "laws", "than", "new", "zealand", "including", "a", "near", "ban", "on", "handguns", "firearm", "homicides", "in", "both", "countries", "track", "one", "another", "over", "25", "years", ",", "indicating", "that", "gun", "control", "is", "not", "a", "control", "variable", "URL", "." ]
saying racist '' is the new saying literally '' . the meaning has all but left and it is left up the the user to decide the situation . '' i ate like , literally 10,000 slices of pizza last night ! '' obviously i did n't eat that much pizza , i was using hyperbole and literally '' was actually figuratively . '' you did n't vote for obama ? you 're a racist ! '' no , i 'm not a racist because i did n't vote for someone , that is stupid . and just because i do n't support people taking my money and giving it to someone else does n't make me a racist either . i guess the point i 'm trying to make is you 're 100 correct , it is a trump card and we are so pc '' as a population , and so scared to be seen as unpc that we will go out of our way to not offend people when what we are saying might be 100 true .
cpozgd8
Libertarian
2,015
saying racist '' is the new saying literally '' . the meaning has all but left and it is left up the the user to decide the situation . '' i ate like , literally 10,000 slices of pizza last night ! '' obviously i did n't eat that much pizza , i was using hyperbole and literally '' was actually figuratively . '' you did n't vote for obama ? you 're a racist ! '' no , i 'm not a racist because i did n't vote for someone , that is stupid . and just because i do n't support people taking my money and giving it to someone else does n't make me a racist either . i guess the point i 'm trying to make is you 're 100 correct , it is a trump card and we are so pc '' as a population , and so scared to be seen as unpc that we will go out of our way to not offend people when what we are saying might be 100 true .
saying racist '' is the new saying literally '' . the meaning has all but left and it is left up the the user to decide the situation . '' i ate like , literally 10,000 slices of pizza last night ! '' obviously i did n't eat that much pizza , i was using hyperbole and literally '' was actually figuratively . '' you did n't vote for obama ? you 're a racist ! '' no , i 'm not a racist because i did n't vote for someone , that is stupid . and just because i do n't support @@people taking my money and giving it to someone else## does n't make me a racist either . i guess the point i 'm trying to make is you 're 100 correct , it is a trump card and we are so pc '' as a population , and so scared to be seen as unpc that we will go out of our way to not offend people when what we are saying might be 100 true .
saying racist '' is the new saying literally '' . the meaning has all but left and it is left up the the user to decide the situation . '' i ate like , literally 10,000 slices of pizza last night ! '' obviously i did n't eat that much pizza , i was using hyperbole and literally '' was actually figuratively . '' you did n't vote for obama ? you 're a racist ! '' no , i 'm not a racist because i did n't vote for someone , that is stupid . and just because i do n't support people taking my money and giving it to someone else does n't make me a racist either . i guess the point i 'm trying to make is you 're 100 correct , it is a trump card and we are so pc '' as a population , and so scared to be seen as unpc that we will go out of our way to not offend people when what we are saying might be 100 true .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "saying", "racist", "``", "is", "the", "new", "saying", "literally", "``", ".", "the", "meaning", "has", "all", "but", "left", "and", "it", "is", "left", "up", "the", "the", "user", "to", "decide", "the", "situation", ".", "``", "i", "ate", "like", ",", "literally", "10,000", "slices", "of", "pizza", "last", "night", "!", "``", "obviously", "i", "did", "n't", "eat", "that", "much", "pizza", ",", "i", "was", "using", "hyperbole", "and", "literally", "``", "was", "actually", "figuratively", ".", "``", "you", "did", "n't", "vote", "for", "obama", "?", "you", "'re", "a", "racist", "!", "``", "no", ",", "i", "'m", "not", "a", "racist", "because", "i", "did", "n't", "vote", "for", "someone", ",", "that", "is", "stupid", ".", "and", "just", "because", "i", "do", "n't", "support", "people", "taking", "my", "money", "and", "giving", "it", "to", "someone", "else", "does", "n't", "make", "me", "a", "racist", "either", ".", "i", "guess", "the", "point", "i", "'m", "trying", "to", "make", "is", "you", "'re", "100", "correct", ",", "it", "is", "a", "trump", "card", "and", "we", "are", "so", "pc", "``", "as", "a", "population", ",", "and", "so", "scared", "to", "be", "seen", "as", "unpc", "that", "we", "will", "go", "out", "of", "our", "way", "to", "not", "offend", "people", "when", "what", "we", "are", "saying", "might", "be", "100", "true", "." ]
good point . now i know how to counter the leftists who throw up that bit .
crpq2a8
Libertarian
2,015
good point . now i know how to counter the @@leftists## who throw up that bit .
good point . now i know how to counter @@the leftists## who throw up that bit .
good point . now i know how to counter @@the leftists## who throw up that bit .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "good", "point", ".", "now", "i", "know", "how", "to", "counter", "the", "leftists", "who", "throw", "up", "that", "bit", "." ]
and after hillary went after him viciously for the gun thing no less .
cvzedht
Libertarian
2,015
and after hillary went after him viciously for the gun thing no less .
and after hillary went after him viciously for the gun thing no less .
and after hillary went after him viciously for the gun thing no less .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "after", "hillary", "went", "after", "him", "viciously", "for", "the", "gun", "thing", "no", "less", "." ]
the former is the conservative pov , the latter is the liberal pov . i never understood why leveling the playing field included bringing down the top instead of just bringing up the bottom ...
cty8k9i
Libertarian
2,015
the former is the conservative pov , the latter is the liberal pov . i never understood why leveling the playing field included bringing down the top instead of just bringing up the bottom ...
the former is the conservative pov , the latter is the liberal pov . i never understood why leveling the playing field included bringing down the top instead of just bringing up the bottom ...
the former is the conservative pov , the latter is the liberal pov . i never understood why leveling the playing field included bringing down the top instead of just bringing up the bottom ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "former", "is", "the", "conservative", "pov", ",", "the", "latter", "is", "the", "liberal", "pov", ".", "i", "never", "understood", "why", "leveling", "the", "playing", "field", "included", "bringing", "down", "the", "top", "instead", "of", "just", "bringing", "up", "the", "bottom", "..." ]
rand is the only candidate running who i think might actually keep his word . although the only reason i believe this is because his dad kept every ! word he ever spoke . i 'm hoping he passed that quality along to junior ...
cq997qb
Libertarian
2,015
rand is the only candidate running who i think might actually keep his word . although the only reason i believe this is because his dad kept every ! word he ever spoke . i 'm hoping he passed that quality along to junior ...
rand is the only candidate running who i think might actually keep his word . although the only reason i believe this is because his dad kept every ! word he ever spoke . i 'm hoping he passed that quality along to junior ...
rand is the only candidate running who i think might actually keep his word . although the only reason i believe this is because his dad kept every ! word he ever spoke . i 'm hoping he passed that quality along to junior ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "rand", "is", "the", "only", "candidate", "running", "who", "i", "think", "might", "actually", "keep", "his", "word", ".", "although", "the", "only", "reason", "i", "believe", "this", "is", "because", "his", "dad", "kept", "every", "!", "word", "he", "ever", "spoke", ".", "i", "'m", "hoping", "he", "passed", "that", "quality", "along", "to", "junior", "..." ]
last time they were anti gun , a few 100 million died .
csgmtwa
Libertarian
2,015
last time they were anti gun , a few 100 million died .
last time they were anti gun , a few 100 million died .
last time they were anti gun , a few 100 million died .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "last", "time", "they", "were", "anti", "gun", ",", "a", "few", "100", "million", "died", "." ]
you seem to be under the impression that my experience must be very similar to yours because we all know how consistent american curriculum is across the board ... if there 's a grand conspiracy to hide japanese internment from american high school students , should n't the curriculum be more consistent ? or is this one of those damnedifyoudo , damnedifyoudo n't arguments wherein japanese internment is being concealed because the curriculum is inconsistent , and absence of evidence is evidence of concealment ? my 5th grade teacher spent most of her time on american history talking about louisiana , making us watch news coverage on the iraq war and telling us why it was right and then we spent some time memorizing timelines . so you grew up in louisiana and 5th grade history focused on your state , but your teacher discussed current events and you also covered broader timelines of historical events . that definitely smacks of a department of education scheme to hide japanese internment if i 've ever heard one . the american history class that had by far the best curriculum in our schools was the ap american history class , which is done by the college board , which is a private nonprofit . a publicprivate partnership run through the public school system with materials that are changed up every year and most certainly do not cover japanese internment unless the class is specifically focused on the ww2 period . i also took ap american history , and it focused on reconstruction the previous year covered the second half of the civil war , the one before that the first half and events immediately preceding it . nobody in ap history learned about japanese internment in the time i was in high school . it was n't part of the endofyear test and so was n't in the curriculum . conspiracy ?
cub02w1
Libertarian
2,015
you seem to be under the impression that my experience must be very similar to yours because we all know how consistent american curriculum is across the board ... if there 's a grand conspiracy to hide japanese internment from @@american high school students## , should n't the curriculum be more consistent ? or is this one of those damnedifyoudo , damnedifyoudo n't arguments wherein japanese internment is being concealed because the curriculum is inconsistent , and absence of evidence is evidence of concealment ? my 5th grade teacher spent most of her time on american history talking about louisiana , making us watch news coverage on the iraq war and telling us why it was right and then we spent some time memorizing timelines . so you grew up in louisiana and 5th grade history focused on your state , but your teacher discussed current events and you also covered broader timelines of historical events . that definitely smacks of a department of education scheme to hide japanese internment if i 've ever heard one . the american history class that had by far the best curriculum in our schools was the ap american history class , which is done by the college board , which is a private nonprofit . a publicprivate partnership run through the public school system with materials that are changed up every year and most certainly do not cover japanese internment unless the class is specifically focused on the ww2 period . i also took ap american history , and it focused on reconstruction the previous year covered the second half of the civil war , the one before that the first half and events immediately preceding it . nobody in ap history learned about japanese internment in the time i was in high school . it was n't part of the endofyear test and so was n't in the curriculum . conspiracy ?
you seem to be under the impression that my experience must be very similar to yours because we all know how consistent american curriculum is across the board ... if there 's a grand conspiracy to hide japanese internment from @@american high school students## , should n't the curriculum be more consistent ? or is this one of those damnedifyoudo , damnedifyoudo n't arguments wherein japanese internment is being concealed because the curriculum is inconsistent , and absence of evidence is evidence of concealment ? my 5th grade teacher spent most of her time on american history talking about louisiana , making us watch news coverage on the iraq war and telling us why it was right and then we spent some time memorizing timelines . so you grew up in louisiana and 5th grade history focused on your state , but your teacher discussed current events and you also covered broader timelines of historical events . that definitely smacks of a department of education scheme to hide japanese internment if i 've ever heard one . the american history class that had by far the best curriculum in our schools was the ap american history class , which is done by @@the college board## , which is a private nonprofit . a publicprivate partnership run through the @@public school system## with materials that are changed up every year and most certainly do not cover japanese internment unless the class is specifically focused on the ww2 period . i also took ap american history , and it focused on reconstruction the previous year covered the second half of the civil war , the one before that the first half and events immediately preceding it . nobody in ap history learned about japanese internment in the time i was in high school . it was n't part of the endofyear test and so was n't in the curriculum . conspiracy ?
you seem to be under the impression that my experience must be very similar to yours because we all know how consistent american curriculum is across the board ... if there 's a grand conspiracy to hide japanese internment from @@american high school students## , should n't the curriculum be more consistent ? or is this one of those damnedifyoudo , damnedifyoudo n't arguments wherein japanese internment is being concealed because the curriculum is inconsistent , and absence of evidence is evidence of concealment ? my 5th grade teacher spent most of her time on american history talking about louisiana , making us watch news coverage on the iraq war and telling us why it was right and then we spent some time memorizing timelines . so you grew up in louisiana and 5th grade history focused on your state , but your teacher discussed current events and you also covered broader timelines of historical events . that definitely smacks of a department of education scheme to hide japanese internment if i 've ever heard one . the american history class that had by far the best curriculum in our schools was the ap american history class , which is done by the college board , which is a private nonprofit . a publicprivate partnership run through the public school system with materials that are changed up every year and most certainly do not cover japanese internment unless the class is specifically focused on the ww2 period . i also took ap american history , and it focused on reconstruction the previous year covered the second half of the civil war , the one before that the first half and events immediately preceding it . nobody in ap history learned about japanese internment in the time i was in high school . it was n't part of the endofyear test and so was n't in the curriculum . conspiracy ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "you", "seem", "to", "be", "under", "the", "impression", "that", "my", "experience", "must", "be", "very", "similar", "to", "yours", "because", "we", "all", "know", "how", "consistent", "american", "curriculum", "is", "across", "the", "board", "...", "if", "there", "'s", "a", "grand", "conspiracy", "to", "hide", "japanese", "internment", "from", "american", "high", "school", "students", ",", "should", "n't", "the", "curriculum", "be", "more", "consistent", "?", "or", "is", "this", "one", "of", "those", "damnedifyoudo", ",", "damnedifyoudo", "n't", "arguments", "wherein", "japanese", "internment", "is", "being", "concealed", "because", "the", "curriculum", "is", "inconsistent", ",", "and", "absence", "of", "evidence", "is", "evidence", "of", "concealment", "?", "my", "5th", "grade", "teacher", "spent", "most", "of", "her", "time", "on", "american", "history", "talking", "about", "louisiana", ",", "making", "us", "watch", "news", "coverage", "on", "the", "iraq", "war", "and", "telling", "us", "why", "it", "was", "right", "and", "then", "we", "spent", "some", "time", "memorizing", "timelines", ".", "so", "you", "grew", "up", "in", "louisiana", "and", "5th", "grade", "history", "focused", "on", "your", "state", ",", "but", "your", "teacher", "discussed", "current", "events", "and", "you", "also", "covered", "broader", "timelines", "of", "historical", "events", ".", "that", "definitely", "smacks", "of", "a", "department", "of", "education", "scheme", "to", "hide", "japanese", "internment", "if", "i", "'ve", "ever", "heard", "one", ".", "the", "american", "history", "class", "that", "had", "by", "far", "the", "best", "curriculum", "in", "our", "schools", "was", "the", "ap", "american", "history", "class", ",", "which", "is", "done", "by", "the", "college", "board", ",", "which", "is", "a", "private", "nonprofit", ".", "a", "publicprivate", "partnership", "run", "through", "the", "public", "school", "system", "with", "materials", "that", "are", "changed", "up", "every", "year", "and", "most", "certainly", "do", "not", "cover", "japanese", "internment", "unless", "the", "class", "is", "specifically", "focused", "on", "the", "ww2", "period", ".", "i", "also", "took", "ap", "american", "history", ",", "and", "it", "focused", "on", "reconstruction", "the", "previous", "year", "covered", "the", "second", "half", "of", "the", "civil", "war", ",", "the", "one", "before", "that", "the", "first", "half", "and", "events", "immediately", "preceding", "it", ".", "nobody", "in", "ap", "history", "learned", "about", "japanese", "internment", "in", "the", "time", "i", "was", "in", "high", "school", ".", "it", "was", "n't", "part", "of", "the", "endofyear", "test", "and", "so", "was", "n't", "in", "the", "curriculum", ".", "conspiracy", "?" ]
yep , you want to take care of children , you do the work to take care of the children . ah , but the goal of a privately owned day care is n't to take care of children . it is to successfully market child care to parents in exchange for the maximal roi . that 's the old joke with business and the reason SUBREDDIT inevitably just becomes SUBREDDIT . maximizing revenue is , at best , tangential to maximizing quality of service . and at that point it would be a criminal offense if a child dies because you lied . a criminal offense made by whom ? enforced by whom ? you 're not talking about instituting a brutal sovietstyle police state , are you ?
co98cz6
Libertarian
2,015
yep , you want to take care of @@children## , you do the work to take care of the @@children## . ah , but the goal of a privately owned day care is n't to take care of @@children## . it is to successfully market child care to @@parents## in exchange for the maximal roi . that 's the old joke with business and the reason SUBREDDIT inevitably just becomes SUBREDDIT . maximizing revenue is , at best , tangential to maximizing quality of service . and at that point it would be a criminal offense if a child dies because you lied . a criminal offense made by whom ? enforced by whom ? you 're not talking about instituting a brutal sovietstyle police state , are you ?
yep , you want to take care of @@children## , you do the work to take care of the @@children## . ah , but the goal of a @@privately owned day care## is n't to take care of @@children## . it is to successfully market child care to @@parents## in exchange for the maximal roi . that 's the old joke with business and the reason SUBREDDIT inevitably just becomes SUBREDDIT . maximizing revenue is , at best , tangential to maximizing quality of service . and at that point it would be a criminal offense if a child dies because you lied . a criminal offense made by whom ? enforced by whom ? you 're not talking about instituting a brutal @@sovietstyle police state## , are you ?
yep , you want to take care of @@children## , you do the work to take care of the @@children## . ah , but the goal of a @@privately owned day care## is n't to take care of @@children## . it is to successfully market child care to @@parents## in exchange for the maximal roi . that 's the old joke with business and the reason SUBREDDIT inevitably just becomes SUBREDDIT . maximizing revenue is , at best , tangential to maximizing quality of service . and at that point it would be a criminal offense if a child dies because you lied . a criminal offense made by whom ? enforced by whom ? you 're not talking about instituting a brutal @@sovietstyle police state## , are you ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yep", ",", "you", "want", "to", "take", "care", "of", "children", ",", "you", "do", "the", "work", "to", "take", "care", "of", "the", "children", ".", "ah", ",", "but", "the", "goal", "of", "a", "privately", "owned", "day", "care", "is", "n't", "to", "take", "care", "of", "children", ".", "it", "is", "to", "successfully", "market", "child", "care", "to", "parents", "in", "exchange", "for", "the", "maximal", "roi", ".", "that", "'s", "the", "old", "joke", "with", "business", "and", "the", "reason", "SUBREDDIT", "inevitably", "just", "becomes", "SUBREDDIT", ".", "maximizing", "revenue", "is", ",", "at", "best", ",", "tangential", "to", "maximizing", "quality", "of", "service", ".", "and", "at", "that", "point", "it", "would", "be", "a", "criminal", "offense", "if", "a", "child", "dies", "because", "you", "lied", ".", "a", "criminal", "offense", "made", "by", "whom", "?", "enforced", "by", "whom", "?", "you", "'re", "not", "talking", "about", "instituting", "a", "brutal", "sovietstyle", "police", "state", ",", "are", "you", "?" ]
handguns are n't going to save you when you 're outnumbered 300 to 1. they are so outnumbered ... it 's something like 45,000 officers in a city of 7 or 8 million ? so , they 're outnumbered , and the other side is the enemy . even if it were n't naturally the enemy , the nypd knows very well how they 've been treating those people for decades . they 've made an enemy of them . the only way to remain safe is to be in control '' , something that they demand . to protect their own asses and selfserve .
cndggq7
Libertarian
2,015
handguns are n't going to save you when you 're outnumbered 300 to 1. they are so outnumbered ... it 's something like 45,000 @@officers## in a city of 7 or 8 million ? so , they 're outnumbered , and the other side is the enemy . even if it were n't naturally the enemy , @@the nypd## knows very well how they 've been treating those people for decades . they 've made an enemy of them . the only way to remain safe is to be in control '' , something that they demand . to protect their own asses and selfserve .
handguns are n't going to save you when you 're outnumbered 300 to 1. they are so outnumbered ... it 's something like 45,000 @@officers## in a city of 7 or 8 million ? so , they 're outnumbered , and the other side is the enemy . even if it were n't naturally the enemy , @@the nypd## knows very well how they 've been treating those people for decades . they 've made an enemy of them . the only way to remain safe is to be in control '' , something that they demand . to protect their own asses and selfserve .
handguns are n't going to save you when you 're outnumbered 300 to 1. they are so outnumbered ... it 's something like 45,000 @@officers## in a city of 7 or 8 million ? so , they 're outnumbered , and the other side is the enemy . even if it were n't naturally the enemy , @@the nypd## knows very well how they 've been treating those people for decades . they 've made an enemy of them . the only way to remain safe is to be in control '' , something that they demand . to protect their own asses and selfserve .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "handguns", "are", "n't", "going", "to", "save", "you", "when", "you", "'re", "outnumbered", "300", "to", "1.", "they", "are", "so", "outnumbered", "...", "it", "'s", "something", "like", "45,000", "officers", "in", "a", "city", "of", "7", "or", "8", "million", "?", "so", ",", "they", "'re", "outnumbered", ",", "and", "the", "other", "side", "is", "the", "enemy", ".", "even", "if", "it", "were", "n't", "naturally", "the", "enemy", ",", "the", "nypd", "knows", "very", "well", "how", "they", "'ve", "been", "treating", "those", "people", "for", "decades", ".", "they", "'ve", "made", "an", "enemy", "of", "them", ".", "the", "only", "way", "to", "remain", "safe", "is", "to", "be", "in", "control", "``", ",", "something", "that", "they", "demand", ".", "to", "protect", "their", "own", "asses", "and", "selfserve", "." ]
the guys is killing it on the campaign trail and his poll numbers reflect that excitement too .
ct6fz5f
Libertarian
2,015
the guys is killing it on the campaign trail and his poll numbers reflect that excitement too .
the guys is killing it on the campaign trail and his poll numbers reflect that excitement too .
the guys is killing it on the campaign trail and his poll numbers reflect that excitement too .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "guys", "is", "killing", "it", "on", "the", "campaign", "trail", "and", "his", "poll", "numbers", "reflect", "that", "excitement", "too", "." ]
it should be selfevident at this point . we 've been addressing drugs from the supply side when it is really a demand issue . if you tried to buy a snow shovel in miami , fl or a surfboard in caribou , me you could n't buy either , but you can get heroin in both places . sufficient demand will always have a willing supplier .
co1b8h4
Libertarian
2,015
it should be selfevident at this point . we 've been addressing drugs from the supply side when it is really a demand issue . if you tried to buy a snow shovel in miami , fl or a surfboard in caribou , me you could n't buy either , but you can get heroin in both places . sufficient demand will always have a willing supplier .
it should be selfevident at this point . we 've been addressing drugs from the supply side when it is really a demand issue . if you tried to buy a snow shovel in miami , fl or a surfboard in caribou , me you could n't buy either , but you can get heroin in both places . sufficient demand will always have a willing supplier .
it should be selfevident at this point . we 've been addressing drugs from the supply side when it is really a demand issue . if you tried to buy a snow shovel in miami , fl or a surfboard in caribou , me you could n't buy either , but you can get heroin in both places . sufficient demand will always have a willing supplier .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "should", "be", "selfevident", "at", "this", "point", ".", "we", "'ve", "been", "addressing", "drugs", "from", "the", "supply", "side", "when", "it", "is", "really", "a", "demand", "issue", ".", "if", "you", "tried", "to", "buy", "a", "snow", "shovel", "in", "miami", ",", "fl", "or", "a", "surfboard", "in", "caribou", ",", "me", "you", "could", "n't", "buy", "either", ",", "but", "you", "can", "get", "heroin", "in", "both", "places", ".", "sufficient", "demand", "will", "always", "have", "a", "willing", "supplier", "." ]
one of many problems is that it does n't give any avenue for redemption . someone who committed a crime 20 years ago and has been clean since should n't have that hanging over their head anymore .
creeth5
Libertarian
2,015
one of many problems is that it does n't give any avenue for redemption . someone who committed a crime 20 years ago and has been clean since should n't have that hanging over their head anymore .
one of many problems is that it does n't give any avenue for redemption . someone who committed a crime 20 years ago and has been clean since should n't have that hanging over their head anymore .
one of many problems is that it does n't give any avenue for redemption . someone who committed a crime 20 years ago and has been clean since should n't have that hanging over their head anymore .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "one", "of", "many", "problems", "is", "that", "it", "does", "n't", "give", "any", "avenue", "for", "redemption", ".", "someone", "who", "committed", "a", "crime", "20", "years", "ago", "and", "has", "been", "clean", "since", "should", "n't", "have", "that", "hanging", "over", "their", "head", "anymore", "." ]
cannabis sativa inc you can contact them at URL
cubeody
Libertarian
2,015
cannabis sativa inc you can contact them at URL
cannabis sativa inc you can contact them at URL
cannabis sativa inc you can contact them at URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "cannabis", "sativa", "inc", "you", "can", "contact", "them", "at", "URL" ]
i always wondered why libertarian 's are not fully supportive of open borders . why do people stop caring about freedom at the border . if we are all for free trade in goods and capital , why not labor ? a border is just an arbitrary line in the ground that governments impose . i hate that governments have the power to determine where in the world i can travel , work and play . it 's because of the ensuing asymmetry of pressure to migrate that becomes an issue . what would happen if the us opened its boarders for example ? we would double in population within a few years . what about the movement of criminals ? not to mention the impact on social welfare and entitlement programs that are based on much different demographics . it 's not like you 'd suddenly have productivity gains to make up for it and even if you did eventually , it would take years or decades to come into balance with a mass exodusmigration . not to mention you 'd need every country on the planet coordinating and a world government type entity to help organize it all . this entity would need significantly different and stronger powers than something like the un . there 's a reason ron paul advocated for sovereignty .
cvssb0f
Libertarian
2,015
i always wondered why @@libertarian 's## are not fully supportive of open borders . why do people stop caring about freedom at the border . if we are all for free trade in goods and capital , why not labor ? a border is just an arbitrary line in the ground that governments impose . i hate that governments have the power to determine where in the world i can travel , work and play . it 's because of the ensuing asymmetry of pressure to migrate that becomes an issue . what would happen if @@the us## opened its boarders for example ? we would double in population within a few years . what about the movement of @@criminals## ? not to mention the impact on social welfare and entitlement programs that are based on much different demographics . it 's not like you 'd suddenly have productivity gains to make up for it and even if you did eventually , it would take years or decades to come into balance with a mass exodusmigration . not to mention you 'd need every country on the planet coordinating and a world government type entity to help organize it all . this entity would need significantly different and stronger powers than something like the un . there 's a reason ron paul advocated for sovereignty .
i always wondered why libertarian 's are not fully supportive of open borders . why do people stop caring about freedom at the border . if we are all for free trade in goods and capital , why not labor ? a border is just an arbitrary line in the ground that governments impose . i hate that governments have the power to determine where in the world i can travel , work and play . it 's because of the ensuing asymmetry of pressure to migrate that becomes an issue . what would happen if @@the us## opened its boarders for example ? we would double in population within a few years . what about the movement of @@criminals## ? not to mention the impact on social welfare and entitlement programs that are based on much different demographics . it 's not like you 'd suddenly have productivity gains to make up for it and even if you did eventually , it would take years or decades to come into balance with a mass exodusmigration . not to mention you 'd need every country on the planet coordinating and a world government type entity to help organize it all . this entity would need significantly different and stronger powers than something like the un . there 's a reason ron paul advocated for sovereignty .
i always wondered why @@libertarian 's## are not fully supportive of open borders . why do people stop caring about freedom at the border . if we are all for free trade in goods and capital , why not labor ? a border is just an arbitrary line in the ground that governments impose . i hate that governments have the power to determine where in the world i can travel , work and play . it 's because of the ensuing asymmetry of pressure to migrate that becomes an issue . what would happen if @@the us## opened its boarders for example ? we would double in population within a few years . what about the movement of @@criminals## ? not to mention the impact on social welfare and entitlement programs that are based on much different demographics . it 's not like you 'd suddenly have productivity gains to make up for it and even if you did eventually , it would take years or decades to come into balance with a mass exodusmigration . not to mention you 'd need every country on the planet coordinating and a world government type entity to help organize it all . this entity would need significantly different and stronger powers than something like the un . there 's a reason ron paul advocated for sovereignty .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "always", "wondered", "why", "libertarian", "'s", "are", "not", "fully", "supportive", "of", "open", "borders", ".", "why", "do", "people", "stop", "caring", "about", "freedom", "at", "the", "border", ".", "if", "we", "are", "all", "for", "free", "trade", "in", "goods", "and", "capital", ",", "why", "not", "labor", "?", "a", "border", "is", "just", "an", "arbitrary", "line", "in", "the", "ground", "that", "governments", "impose", ".", "i", "hate", "that", "governments", "have", "the", "power", "to", "determine", "where", "in", "the", "world", "i", "can", "travel", ",", "work", "and", "play", ".", "it", "'s", "because", "of", "the", "ensuing", "asymmetry", "of", "pressure", "to", "migrate", "that", "becomes", "an", "issue", ".", "what", "would", "happen", "if", "the", "us", "opened", "its", "boarders", "for", "example", "?", "we", "would", "double", "in", "population", "within", "a", "few", "years", ".", "what", "about", "the", "movement", "of", "criminals", "?", "not", "to", "mention", "the", "impact", "on", "social", "welfare", "and", "entitlement", "programs", "that", "are", "based", "on", "much", "different", "demographics", ".", "it", "'s", "not", "like", "you", "'d", "suddenly", "have", "productivity", "gains", "to", "make", "up", "for", "it", "and", "even", "if", "you", "did", "eventually", ",", "it", "would", "take", "years", "or", "decades", "to", "come", "into", "balance", "with", "a", "mass", "exodusmigration", ".", "not", "to", "mention", "you", "'d", "need", "every", "country", "on", "the", "planet", "coordinating", "and", "a", "world", "government", "type", "entity", "to", "help", "organize", "it", "all", ".", "this", "entity", "would", "need", "significantly", "different", "and", "stronger", "powers", "than", "something", "like", "the", "un", ".", "there", "'s", "a", "reason", "ron", "paul", "advocated", "for", "sovereignty", "." ]
yeah but the wbc is a church so they 're allowed to spew all the hate speech they want . double standards are fun .
cq2z3ed
Libertarian
2,015
yeah but @@the wbc## is a church so they 're allowed to spew all the hate speech they want . double standards are fun .
yeah but the wbc is a church so they 're allowed to spew all the hate speech they want . double standards are fun .
yeah but @@the wbc## is a church so they 're allowed to spew all the hate speech they want . double standards are fun .
[ "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yeah", "but", "the", "wbc", "is", "a", "church", "so", "they", "'re", "allowed", "to", "spew", "all", "the", "hate", "speech", "they", "want", ".", "double", "standards", "are", "fun", "." ]
the problem is most govt regulations are like using a sledgehammer . you see an honest problem and propose a very specific lawURL to fix it . but it also applies to thousands of other cases where there is n't a clear cut wrong being done .
cp13wou
Libertarian
2,015
the problem is most govt regulations are like using a sledgehammer . you see an honest problem and propose a very specific lawURL to fix it . but it also applies to thousands of other cases where there is n't a clear cut wrong being done .
the problem is most govt regulations are like using a sledgehammer . you see an honest problem and propose a very specific lawURL to fix it . but it also applies to thousands of other cases where there is n't a clear cut wrong being done .
the problem is most govt regulations are like using a sledgehammer . you see an honest problem and propose a very specific lawURL to fix it . but it also applies to thousands of other cases where there is n't a clear cut wrong being done .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "problem", "is", "most", "govt", "regulations", "are", "like", "using", "a", "sledgehammer", ".", "you", "see", "an", "honest", "problem", "and", "propose", "a", "very", "specific", "lawURL", "to", "fix", "it", ".", "but", "it", "also", "applies", "to", "thousands", "of", "other", "cases", "where", "there", "is", "n't", "a", "clear", "cut", "wrong", "being", "done", "." ]
that 's one way to get rid of bad hobbit reviews .
cude9ng
Libertarian
2,015
that 's one way to get rid of bad hobbit reviews .
that 's one way to get rid of bad hobbit reviews .
that 's one way to get rid of bad hobbit reviews .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "'s", "one", "way", "to", "get", "rid", "of", "bad", "hobbit", "reviews", "." ]
lmfao you want to support a candidate based soley of of his funding ? you realize bernie is literally the exact opposite of a libertarian right ?
csef2zj
Libertarian
2,015
lmfao you want to support a candidate based soley of of his funding ? you realize bernie is literally the exact opposite of a libertarian right ?
lmfao you want to support a candidate based soley of of his funding ? you realize bernie is literally the exact opposite of a libertarian right ?
lmfao you want to support a candidate based soley of of his funding ? you realize bernie is literally the exact opposite of a libertarian right ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "lmfao", "you", "want", "to", "support", "a", "candidate", "based", "soley", "of", "of", "his", "funding", "?", "you", "realize", "bernie", "is", "literally", "the", "exact", "opposite", "of", "a", "libertarian", "right", "?" ]
how is this thought provoking ? what can be gleaned from this stick figure drawing except to say that gubbermint is evil ? '' is the message saying that any form of regulatory licensing is bad ? because that would be absurd .
coo6hsr
Libertarian
2,015
how is this thought provoking ? what can be gleaned from this stick figure drawing except to say that gubbermint is evil ? '' is the message saying that any form of regulatory licensing is bad ? because that would be absurd .
how is this thought provoking ? what can be gleaned from this stick figure drawing except to say that gubbermint is evil ? '' is the message saying that any form of regulatory licensing is bad ? because that would be absurd .
how is this thought provoking ? what can be gleaned from this stick figure drawing except to say that gubbermint is evil ? '' is the message saying that any form of regulatory licensing is bad ? because that would be absurd .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "how", "is", "this", "thought", "provoking", "?", "what", "can", "be", "gleaned", "from", "this", "stick", "figure", "drawing", "except", "to", "say", "that", "gubbermint", "is", "evil", "?", "``", "is", "the", "message", "saying", "that", "any", "form", "of", "regulatory", "licensing", "is", "bad", "?", "because", "that", "would", "be", "absurd", "." ]
i did n't realize that favoring a law that would restrict state employees from harassing private citizens made one a statist .
cqrkdgg
Libertarian
2,015
i did n't realize that favoring a law that would restrict @@state employees## from harassing @@private citizens## made one a statist .
i did n't realize that favoring a law that would restrict @@state employees## from harassing @@private citizens## made one a statist .
i did n't realize that favoring a law that would restrict @@state employees## from harassing @@private citizens## made one a statist .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "did", "n't", "realize", "that", "favoring", "a", "law", "that", "would", "restrict", "state", "employees", "from", "harassing", "private", "citizens", "made", "one", "a", "statist", "." ]
but if you have a jury trial , i ca n't imagine completely painting your client as a douchebag is a good move . blaming a newborn just seems so despicable that i ca n't imagine it would be a good move if it ever moves to trial .
croyuya
Libertarian
2,015
but if you have a jury trial , i ca n't imagine completely painting your client as a douchebag is a good move . blaming a newborn just seems so despicable that i ca n't imagine it would be a good move if it ever moves to trial .
but if you have a jury trial , i ca n't imagine completely painting your client as a douchebag is a good move . blaming a newborn just seems so despicable that i ca n't imagine it would be a good move if it ever moves to trial .
but if you have a jury trial , i ca n't imagine completely painting your client as a douchebag is a good move . blaming a newborn just seems so despicable that i ca n't imagine it would be a good move if it ever moves to trial .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "but", "if", "you", "have", "a", "jury", "trial", ",", "i", "ca", "n't", "imagine", "completely", "painting", "your", "client", "as", "a", "douchebag", "is", "a", "good", "move", ".", "blaming", "a", "newborn", "just", "seems", "so", "despicable", "that", "i", "ca", "n't", "imagine", "it", "would", "be", "a", "good", "move", "if", "it", "ever", "moves", "to", "trial", "." ]
and i 'm rebutting a mind blowingly silly answer .
d5aukui
Libertarian
2,016
and i 'm rebutting a mind blowingly silly answer .
and i 'm rebutting a mind blowingly silly answer .
and i 'm rebutting a mind blowingly silly answer .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "and", "i", "'m", "rebutting", "a", "mind", "blowingly", "silly", "answer", "." ]
lol . i am sure that 's why the nra paid congress to implement the ban .
cytu98y
Libertarian
2,016
lol . i am sure that 's why @@the nra## paid @@congress## to implement the ban .
lol . i am sure that 's why @@the nra## paid @@congress## to implement the ban .
lol . i am sure that 's why @@the nra## paid @@congress## to implement the ban .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "lol", ".", "i", "am", "sure", "that", "'s", "why", "the", "nra", "paid", "congress", "to", "implement", "the", "ban", "." ]
in the us , you can generally refuse service , refuse to hire someone , etc . for whatever reason you want as long as it 's not because they 're a member of a protected class URL . several states have additional protected classes on top of the federal ones such as sexual orientation , gender identity , etc .
d24f8wq
Libertarian
2,016
in the us , you can generally refuse service , refuse to hire someone , etc . for whatever reason you want as long as it 's not because they 're a member of a protected class URL . several states have additional @@protected classes## on top of the federal ones such as sexual orientation , gender identity , etc .
in the us , you can generally refuse service , refuse to hire someone , etc . for whatever reason you want as long as it 's not because they 're a member of a protected class URL . several states have additional protected classes on top of the federal ones such as sexual orientation , gender identity , etc .
in the us , you can generally refuse service , refuse to hire someone , etc . for whatever reason you want as long as it 's not because they 're a member of a protected class URL . several states have additional protected classes on top of the federal ones such as sexual orientation , gender identity , etc .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "in", "the", "us", ",", "you", "can", "generally", "refuse", "service", ",", "refuse", "to", "hire", "someone", ",", "etc", ".", "for", "whatever", "reason", "you", "want", "as", "long", "as", "it", "'s", "not", "because", "they", "'re", "a", "member", "of", "a", "protected", "class", "URL", ".", "several", "states", "have", "additional", "protected", "classes", "on", "top", "of", "the", "federal", "ones", "such", "as", "sexual", "orientation", ",", "gender", "identity", ",", "etc", "." ]
he probably just keeps shouting , king me '' while you have to avoid telling him thats not how it works so you dont have his cheerleaders trying to lynch you .
dakhvpp
Libertarian
2,016
he probably just keeps shouting , king me '' while you have to avoid telling him thats not how it works so you dont have his @@cheerleaders## trying to lynch you .
he probably just keeps shouting , king me '' while you have to avoid telling him thats not how it works so you dont have his cheerleaders trying to lynch you .
he probably just keeps shouting , king me '' while you have to avoid telling him thats not how it works so you dont have his @@cheerleaders## trying to lynch you .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "he", "probably", "just", "keeps", "shouting", ",", "king", "me", "``", "while", "you", "have", "to", "avoid", "telling", "him", "thats", "not", "how", "it", "works", "so", "you", "dont", "have", "his", "cheerleaders", "trying", "to", "lynch", "you", "." ]
well libertarians do n't want stuff to be free but they want to promote real capitalism and competition to bring the price down . we would n't need socialized health care if capitalism made the price fair and competitive , so they are basically two ends to the same mean fairly making something accessible to everyone . either through capitalism or socialization . neither of what the democrats or the republicans are doing will work , we need to focus on one ideology and stick with it . we lost our chance with sanders so i 'm probably going to vote libertarian this year
d41wk4p
Libertarian
2,016
well @@libertarians## do n't want stuff to be free but they want to promote real capitalism and competition to bring the price down . we would n't need socialized health care if capitalism made the price fair and competitive , so they are basically two ends to the same mean fairly making something accessible to everyone . either through capitalism or socialization . neither of what the @@democrats## or the @@republicans## are doing will work , we need to focus on one ideology and stick with it . we lost our chance with sanders so i 'm probably going to vote libertarian this year
well libertarians do n't want stuff to be free but they want to promote real capitalism and competition to bring the price down . we would n't need socialized health care if capitalism made the price fair and competitive , so they are basically two ends to the same mean fairly making something accessible to everyone . either through capitalism or socialization . neither of what the @@democrats## or the @@republicans## are doing will work , we need to focus on one ideology and stick with it . we lost our chance with sanders so i 'm probably going to vote libertarian this year
well @@libertarians## do n't want stuff to be free but they want to promote real capitalism and competition to bring the price down . we would n't need socialized health care if capitalism made the price fair and competitive , so they are basically two ends to the same mean fairly making something accessible to everyone . either through capitalism or socialization . neither of what the @@democrats## or the @@republicans## are doing will work , we need to focus on one ideology and stick with it . we lost our chance with sanders so i 'm probably going to vote libertarian this year
[ "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "well", "libertarians", "do", "n't", "want", "stuff", "to", "be", "free", "but", "they", "want", "to", "promote", "real", "capitalism", "and", "competition", "to", "bring", "the", "price", "down", ".", "we", "would", "n't", "need", "socialized", "health", "care", "if", "capitalism", "made", "the", "price", "fair", "and", "competitive", ",", "so", "they", "are", "basically", "two", "ends", "to", "the", "same", "mean", "fairly", "making", "something", "accessible", "to", "everyone", ".", "either", "through", "capitalism", "or", "socialization", ".", "neither", "of", "what", "the", "democrats", "or", "the", "republicans", "are", "doing", "will", "work", ",", "we", "need", "to", "focus", "on", "one", "ideology", "and", "stick", "with", "it", ".", "we", "lost", "our", "chance", "with", "sanders", "so", "i", "'m", "probably", "going", "to", "vote", "libertarian", "this", "year" ]
reagan 's bff sounds like a bad guy .
d5wsmmj
Libertarian
2,016
reagan 's bff sounds like a bad guy .
reagan 's bff sounds like a bad guy .
reagan 's bff sounds like a bad guy .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "reagan", "'s", "bff", "sounds", "like", "a", "bad", "guy", "." ]
an issue is that defining capitalism is a pretty hard thing to do when governments that intervene in markets exist , much like in socialism where some form of private business typically exists . you can , though , approximate the degrees of freedomURL that exist in various countries , and there are indexes out there that seek to explain this , and the us is certainly not at the top of the list for freedom . some of these alleged democratic socialist havens actually score higher in some fields because their worklabor laws are more capitalist , and so on . edit if you want to look at the closest things to pure capitalism that exist , you should look at singapore or hong kong more than the us .
d41bceo
Libertarian
2,016
an issue is that defining capitalism is a pretty hard thing to do when @@governments that intervene in markets## exist , much like in socialism where some form of private business typically exists . you can , though , approximate the degrees of freedomURL that exist in various countries , and there are indexes out there that seek to explain this , and the us is certainly not at the top of the list for freedom . some of these alleged democratic socialist havens actually score higher in some fields because their worklabor laws are more capitalist , and so on . edit if you want to look at the closest things to pure capitalism that exist , you should look at singapore or hong kong more than the us .
an issue is that defining capitalism is a pretty hard thing to do when governments that intervene in markets exist , much like in socialism where some form of private business typically exists . you can , though , approximate the degrees of freedomURL that exist in various countries , and there are indexes out there that seek to explain this , and @@the us## is certainly not at the top of the list for freedom . some of these alleged democratic socialist havens actually score higher in some fields because their worklabor laws are more capitalist , and so on . edit if you want to look at the closest things to pure capitalism that exist , you should look at @@singapore## or @@hong kong## more than @@the us## .
an issue is that defining capitalism is a pretty hard thing to do when @@governments that intervene in markets## exist , much like in socialism where some form of private business typically exists . you can , though , approximate the degrees of freedomURL that exist in various countries , and there are indexes out there that seek to explain this , and the us is certainly not at the top of the list for freedom . some of these alleged democratic socialist havens actually score higher in some fields because their worklabor laws are more capitalist , and so on . edit if you want to look at the closest things to pure capitalism that exist , you should look at singapore or hong kong more than the us .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "an", "issue", "is", "that", "defining", "capitalism", "is", "a", "pretty", "hard", "thing", "to", "do", "when", "governments", "that", "intervene", "in", "markets", "exist", ",", "much", "like", "in", "socialism", "where", "some", "form", "of", "private", "business", "typically", "exists", ".", "you", "can", ",", "though", ",", "approximate", "the", "degrees", "of", "freedomURL", "that", "exist", "in", "various", "countries", ",", "and", "there", "are", "indexes", "out", "there", "that", "seek", "to", "explain", "this", ",", "and", "the", "us", "is", "certainly", "not", "at", "the", "top", "of", "the", "list", "for", "freedom", ".", "some", "of", "these", "alleged", "democratic", "socialist", "havens", "actually", "score", "higher", "in", "some", "fields", "because", "their", "worklabor", "laws", "are", "more", "capitalist", ",", "and", "so", "on", ".", "edit", "if", "you", "want", "to", "look", "at", "the", "closest", "things", "to", "pure", "capitalism", "that", "exist", ",", "you", "should", "look", "at", "singapore", "or", "hong", "kong", "more", "than", "the", "us", "." ]
id rather be a slave trader with lobbyists that gained me privileges not given to other slavers . paging URL
dbb2rs4
Libertarian
2,016
id rather be a slave trader with @@lobbyists## that gained me privileges not given to other @@slavers## . paging URL
id rather be a slave trader with @@lobbyists## that gained me privileges not given to other slavers . paging URL
id rather be a slave trader with @@lobbyists## that gained me privileges not given to other @@slavers## . paging URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "id", "rather", "be", "a", "slave", "trader", "with", "lobbyists", "that", "gained", "me", "privileges", "not", "given", "to", "other", "slavers", ".", "paging", "URL" ]
is the harm done by abuse of the system greater than the harm done by abuse of the children ?
dahhav4
Libertarian
2,016
is the harm done by abuse of the system greater than the harm done by abuse of the @@children## ?
is the harm done by abuse of the system greater than the harm done by abuse of the children ?
is the harm done by abuse of the system greater than the harm done by abuse of the @@children## ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0 ]
[ "is", "the", "harm", "done", "by", "abuse", "of", "the", "system", "greater", "than", "the", "harm", "done", "by", "abuse", "of", "the", "children", "?" ]
a bit of a cesspool will always be par for the course with subs segregated by ideology , partially because echo chambersconfirmation bias is unavoidable , but also just because memeing is fun when you 're part of a group that shares similar ideas . but , i do n't think i 've encountered a major political sub that 's better than this one in that regard .
dbpy4zw
Libertarian
2,016
a bit of a cesspool will always be par for the course with subs segregated by ideology , partially because echo chambersconfirmation bias is unavoidable , but also just because memeing is fun when you 're part of a group that shares similar ideas . but , i do n't think i 've encountered a major political sub that 's better than this one in that regard .
a bit of a cesspool will always be par for the course with subs segregated by ideology , partially because echo chambersconfirmation bias is unavoidable , but also just because memeing is fun when you 're part of a group that shares similar ideas . but , i do n't think i 've encountered a major political sub that 's better than this one in that regard .
a bit of a cesspool will always be par for the course with subs segregated by ideology , partially because echo chambersconfirmation bias is unavoidable , but also just because memeing is fun when you 're part of a group that shares similar ideas . but , i do n't think i 've encountered a major political sub that 's better than this one in that regard .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "a", "bit", "of", "a", "cesspool", "will", "always", "be", "par", "for", "the", "course", "with", "subs", "segregated", "by", "ideology", ",", "partially", "because", "echo", "chambersconfirmation", "bias", "is", "unavoidable", ",", "but", "also", "just", "because", "memeing", "is", "fun", "when", "you", "'re", "part", "of", "a", "group", "that", "shares", "similar", "ideas", ".", "but", ",", "i", "do", "n't", "think", "i", "'ve", "encountered", "a", "major", "political", "sub", "that", "'s", "better", "than", "this", "one", "in", "that", "regard", "." ]
that person does n't deserve the same rights as me because of x y zed ... i just ca n't see it as separate . if i start arbitrarily delineating what is and is not a human , where will i stop ? every person deserves the same rights , but remember , i 'm not saying the embryo is n't alive or that it is n't human , i 'm saying it does n't qualify as a person because it lacks selfawareness and agency . when did your life begin ? when you popped out ? when your mother decided she would take care of you ? when you had your first memory ? when you could make your own decisions ? when you turned 18 ? being a person is more than simply being alive . personhood is a definition of the community , it is not any sort of biological fact . a person is not the same as a human . my life began at conception , but my personhood is not my life . there can be life without personhood . plus , the whole sexual revolution is a fucking disaster . i absolutely see it as fornication with disregard for consequences , which is and has always been immoral . i 'm atheist , but conservative . sex has never been immoral , it 's the dishonesty and irresponsibility that is the sin . where 's the dishonesty ? people have sex , most of the time it 's for fun and to celebrate love and there is n't a desire for the child . just because it 's possible to get pregnant should n't take away their agency to experience that pleasure and whilst not having to care for a child . and the whole point of abortion is that it 's the responsible thing to do when you do n't have the means to care for a child when birth control methods did n't work . it 's also a liberating technology for women to avoid the excruciating pains of child birth and other changes to their body that pregnancy would bring to their body .
d0osmws
Libertarian
2,016
that person does n't deserve the same rights as me because of x y zed ... i just ca n't see it as separate . if i start arbitrarily delineating what is and is not a human , where will i stop ? every person deserves the same rights , but remember , i 'm not saying the embryo is n't alive or that it is n't human , i 'm saying it does n't qualify as a person because it lacks selfawareness and agency . when did your life begin ? when you popped out ? when your mother decided she would take care of you ? when you had your first memory ? when you could make your own decisions ? when you turned 18 ? being a person is more than simply being alive . personhood is a definition of the community , it is not any sort of biological fact . a person is not the same as a human . my life began at conception , but my personhood is not my life . there can be life without personhood . plus , the whole sexual revolution is a fucking disaster . i absolutely see it as fornication with disregard for consequences , which is and has always been immoral . i 'm atheist , but conservative . sex has never been immoral , it 's the dishonesty and irresponsibility that is the sin . where 's the dishonesty ? people have sex , most of the time it 's for fun and to celebrate love and there is n't a desire for the child . just because it 's possible to get pregnant should n't take away their agency to experience that pleasure and whilst not having to care for a child . and the whole point of abortion is that it 's the responsible thing to do when you do n't have the means to care for a child when birth control methods did n't work . it 's also a liberating technology for @@women## to avoid the excruciating pains of child birth and other changes to their body that pregnancy would bring to their body .
that person does n't deserve the same rights as me because of x y zed ... i just ca n't see it as separate . if i start arbitrarily delineating what is and is not a human , where will i stop ? every person deserves the same rights , but remember , i 'm not saying the embryo is n't alive or that it is n't human , i 'm saying it does n't qualify as a person because it lacks selfawareness and agency . when did your life begin ? when you popped out ? when your mother decided she would take care of you ? when you had your first memory ? when you could make your own decisions ? when you turned 18 ? being a person is more than simply being alive . personhood is a definition of the community , it is not any sort of biological fact . a person is not the same as a human . my life began at conception , but my personhood is not my life . there can be life without personhood . plus , the whole sexual revolution is a fucking disaster . i absolutely see it as fornication with disregard for consequences , which is and has always been immoral . i 'm atheist , but conservative . sex has never been immoral , it 's the dishonesty and irresponsibility that is the sin . where 's the dishonesty ? people have sex , most of the time it 's for fun and to celebrate love and there is n't a desire for the child . just because it 's possible to get pregnant should n't take away their agency to experience that pleasure and whilst not having to care for a child . and the whole point of abortion is that it 's the responsible thing to do when you do n't have the means to care for a child when birth control methods did n't work . it 's also a liberating technology for women to avoid the excruciating pains of child birth and other changes to their body that pregnancy would bring to their body .
that person does n't deserve the same rights as me because of x y zed ... i just ca n't see it as separate . if i start arbitrarily delineating what is and is not a human , where will i stop ? every person deserves the same rights , but remember , i 'm not saying the embryo is n't alive or that it is n't human , i 'm saying it does n't qualify as a person because it lacks selfawareness and agency . when did your life begin ? when you popped out ? when your mother decided she would take care of you ? when you had your first memory ? when you could make your own decisions ? when you turned 18 ? being a person is more than simply being alive . personhood is a definition of the community , it is not any sort of biological fact . a person is not the same as a human . my life began at conception , but my personhood is not my life . there can be life without personhood . plus , the whole sexual revolution is a fucking disaster . i absolutely see it as fornication with disregard for consequences , which is and has always been immoral . i 'm atheist , but conservative . sex has never been immoral , it 's the dishonesty and irresponsibility that is the sin . where 's the dishonesty ? people have sex , most of the time it 's for fun and to celebrate love and there is n't a desire for the child . just because it 's possible to get pregnant should n't take away their agency to experience that pleasure and whilst not having to care for a child . and the whole point of abortion is that it 's the responsible thing to do when you do n't have the means to care for a child when birth control methods did n't work . it 's also a liberating technology for @@women## to avoid the excruciating pains of child birth and other changes to their body that pregnancy would bring to their body .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "that", "person", "does", "n't", "deserve", "the", "same", "rights", "as", "me", "because", "of", "x", "y", "zed", "...", "i", "just", "ca", "n't", "see", "it", "as", "separate", ".", "if", "i", "start", "arbitrarily", "delineating", "what", "is", "and", "is", "not", "a", "human", ",", "where", "will", "i", "stop", "?", "every", "person", "deserves", "the", "same", "rights", ",", "but", "remember", ",", "i", "'m", "not", "saying", "the", "embryo", "is", "n't", "alive", "or", "that", "it", "is", "n't", "human", ",", "i", "'m", "saying", "it", "does", "n't", "qualify", "as", "a", "person", "because", "it", "lacks", "selfawareness", "and", "agency", ".", "when", "did", "your", "life", "begin", "?", "when", "you", "popped", "out", "?", "when", "your", "mother", "decided", "she", "would", "take", "care", "of", "you", "?", "when", "you", "had", "your", "first", "memory", "?", "when", "you", "could", "make", "your", "own", "decisions", "?", "when", "you", "turned", "18", "?", "being", "a", "person", "is", "more", "than", "simply", "being", "alive", ".", "personhood", "is", "a", "definition", "of", "the", "community", ",", "it", "is", "not", "any", "sort", "of", "biological", "fact", ".", "a", "person", "is", "not", "the", "same", "as", "a", "human", ".", "my", "life", "began", "at", "conception", ",", "but", "my", "personhood", "is", "not", "my", "life", ".", "there", "can", "be", "life", "without", "personhood", ".", "plus", ",", "the", "whole", "sexual", "revolution", "is", "a", "fucking", "disaster", ".", "i", "absolutely", "see", "it", "as", "fornication", "with", "disregard", "for", "consequences", ",", "which", "is", "and", "has", "always", "been", "immoral", ".", "i", "'m", "atheist", ",", "but", "conservative", ".", "sex", "has", "never", "been", "immoral", ",", "it", "'s", "the", "dishonesty", "and", "irresponsibility", "that", "is", "the", "sin", ".", "where", "'s", "the", "dishonesty", "?", "people", "have", "sex", ",", "most", "of", "the", "time", "it", "'s", "for", "fun", "and", "to", "celebrate", "love", "and", "there", "is", "n't", "a", "desire", "for", "the", "child", ".", "just", "because", "it", "'s", "possible", "to", "get", "pregnant", "should", "n't", "take", "away", "their", "agency", "to", "experience", "that", "pleasure", "and", "whilst", "not", "having", "to", "care", "for", "a", "child", ".", "and", "the", "whole", "point", "of", "abortion", "is", "that", "it", "'s", "the", "responsible", "thing", "to", "do", "when", "you", "do", "n't", "have", "the", "means", "to", "care", "for", "a", "child", "when", "birth", "control", "methods", "did", "n't", "work", ".", "it", "'s", "also", "a", "liberating", "technology", "for", "women", "to", "avoid", "the", "excruciating", "pains", "of", "child", "birth", "and", "other", "changes", "to", "their", "body", "that", "pregnancy", "would", "bring", "to", "their", "body", "." ]
it 's the same as always . the man 's wishes really do n't matter . reverts to viabilitypersonhood , and once the fetus reaches that point the life of the fetus deserves legal protection .
cymtr65
Libertarian
2,016
it 's the same as always . the man 's wishes really do n't matter . reverts to viabilitypersonhood , and once the fetus reaches that point the life of the fetus deserves legal protection .
it 's the same as always . the man 's wishes really do n't matter . reverts to viabilitypersonhood , and once the fetus reaches that point the life of the fetus deserves legal protection .
it 's the same as always . the man 's wishes really do n't matter . reverts to viabilitypersonhood , and once the fetus reaches that point the life of the fetus deserves legal protection .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "it", "'s", "the", "same", "as", "always", ".", "the", "man", "'s", "wishes", "really", "do", "n't", "matter", ".", "reverts", "to", "viabilitypersonhood", ",", "and", "once", "the", "fetus", "reaches", "that", "point", "the", "life", "of", "the", "fetus", "deserves", "legal", "protection", "." ]
free trade as defined by milton friedman is where good are free to move in between countries with no taxes placed on them .
d4pqdnh
Libertarian
2,016
free trade as defined by milton friedman is where good are free to move in between countries with no taxes placed on them .
free trade as defined by milton friedman is where good are free to move in between countries with no taxes placed on them .
free trade as defined by milton friedman is where good are free to move in between countries with no taxes placed on them .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "free", "trade", "as", "defined", "by", "milton", "friedman", "is", "where", "good", "are", "free", "to", "move", "in", "between", "countries", "with", "no", "taxes", "placed", "on", "them", "." ]
better to try to change the law ... than to just break them . why ? their law '' the ban is an infringement on the rights of the individuals within the area . why should the dictates of some people in suits have any control over the actions of consenting individuals ? who exactly is harmed in people with extraempty rooms offering them for short durations in exchange for currency ? why should any respect be afforded to that law '' for any duration ?
d9d10jq
Libertarian
2,016
better to try to change the law ... than to just break them . why ? their law '' the ban is an infringement on the rights of the individuals within the area . why should the dictates of some people in suits have any control over the actions of consenting individuals ? who exactly is harmed in people with extraempty rooms offering them for short durations in exchange for currency ? why should any respect be afforded to that law '' for any duration ?
better to try to change the law ... than to just break them . why ? their law '' the ban is an infringement on the rights of the individuals within the area . why should the dictates of some @@people in suits## have any control over the actions of @@consenting individuals## ? who exactly is harmed in @@people with extraempty rooms## offering them for short durations in exchange for currency ? why should any respect be afforded to that law '' for any duration ?
better to try to change the law ... than to just break them . why ? their law '' the ban is an infringement on the rights of the individuals within the area . why should the dictates of some @@people in suits## have any control over the actions of @@consenting individuals## ? who exactly is harmed in @@people with extraempty rooms## offering them for short durations in exchange for currency ? why should any respect be afforded to that law '' for any duration ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "better", "to", "try", "to", "change", "the", "law", "...", "than", "to", "just", "break", "them", ".", "why", "?", "their", "law", "``", "the", "ban", "is", "an", "infringement", "on", "the", "rights", "of", "the", "individuals", "within", "the", "area", ".", "why", "should", "the", "dictates", "of", "some", "people", "in", "suits", "have", "any", "control", "over", "the", "actions", "of", "consenting", "individuals", "?", "who", "exactly", "is", "harmed", "in", "people", "with", "extraempty", "rooms", "offering", "them", "for", "short", "durations", "in", "exchange", "for", "currency", "?", "why", "should", "any", "respect", "be", "afforded", "to", "that", "law", "``", "for", "any", "duration", "?" ]
given that the nicotine gels can be prepackaged separately from the end product ? i 'd say the small makers simply need to get out of the nicotine distillation business and they 'll be fine . buy the nicotine in predistilled quantities and you 're home free .
d3r1dxq
Libertarian
2,016
given that the nicotine gels can be prepackaged separately from the end product ? i 'd say the small makers simply need to get out of the nicotine distillation business and they 'll be fine . buy the nicotine in predistilled quantities and you 're home free .
given that the nicotine gels can be prepackaged separately from the end product ? i 'd say @@the small makers## simply need to get out of the nicotine distillation business and they 'll be fine . buy the nicotine in predistilled quantities and you 're home free .
given that the nicotine gels can be prepackaged separately from the end product ? i 'd say @@the small makers## simply need to get out of the nicotine distillation business and they 'll be fine . buy the nicotine in predistilled quantities and you 're home free .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "given", "that", "the", "nicotine", "gels", "can", "be", "prepackaged", "separately", "from", "the", "end", "product", "?", "i", "'d", "say", "the", "small", "makers", "simply", "need", "to", "get", "out", "of", "the", "nicotine", "distillation", "business", "and", "they", "'ll", "be", "fine", ".", "buy", "the", "nicotine", "in", "predistilled", "quantities", "and", "you", "'re", "home", "free", "." ]
instead of having the government intervene how about people take responsibility to adequately dress their windows ?
daxgixn
Libertarian
2,016
instead of having the government intervene how about people take responsibility to adequately dress their windows ?
instead of having the government intervene how about people take responsibility to adequately dress their windows ?
instead of having the government intervene how about people take responsibility to adequately dress their windows ?
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "instead", "of", "having", "the", "government", "intervene", "how", "about", "people", "take", "responsibility", "to", "adequately", "dress", "their", "windows", "?" ]
automation does n't always mean fewer jobs . in the wsj today is an article about amazon . in passing , it mentions that it 's most automated warehouses have the most employees . why ? they do a higher volume and thus have to fill more orders . so , there really is n't a need for a solution '' the market , and it 's forces , usually necessitate a solution . the opposite is to force every ditch digger to dig with a spoon . nothing will get done , but we 'll have full employment !
dajrojk
Libertarian
2,016
automation does n't always mean fewer jobs . in the wsj today is an article about amazon . in passing , it mentions that it 's most automated warehouses have the most @@employees## . why ? they do a higher volume and thus have to fill more orders . so , there really is n't a need for a solution '' the market , and it 's forces , usually necessitate a solution . the opposite is to force every ditch digger to dig with a spoon . nothing will get done , but we 'll have full employment !
automation does n't always mean fewer jobs . in the wsj today is an article about @@amazon## . in passing , it mentions that it 's most automated warehouses have the most @@employees## . why ? they do a higher volume and thus have to fill more orders . so , there really is n't a need for a solution '' the market , and it 's forces , usually necessitate a solution . the opposite is to force every ditch digger to dig with a spoon . nothing will get done , but we 'll have full employment !
automation does n't always mean fewer jobs . in the wsj today is an article about amazon . in passing , it mentions that it 's most automated warehouses have the most @@employees## . why ? they do a higher volume and thus have to fill more orders . so , there really is n't a need for a solution '' the market , and it 's forces , usually necessitate a solution . the opposite is to force every ditch digger to dig with a spoon . nothing will get done , but we 'll have full employment !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "automation", "does", "n't", "always", "mean", "fewer", "jobs", ".", "in", "the", "wsj", "today", "is", "an", "article", "about", "amazon", ".", "in", "passing", ",", "it", "mentions", "that", "it", "'s", "most", "automated", "warehouses", "have", "the", "most", "employees", ".", "why", "?", "they", "do", "a", "higher", "volume", "and", "thus", "have", "to", "fill", "more", "orders", ".", "so", ",", "there", "really", "is", "n't", "a", "need", "for", "a", "solution", "``", "the", "market", ",", "and", "it", "'s", "forces", ",", "usually", "necessitate", "a", "solution", ".", "the", "opposite", "is", "to", "force", "every", "ditch", "digger", "to", "dig", "with", "a", "spoon", ".", "nothing", "will", "get", "done", ",", "but", "we", "'ll", "have", "full", "employment", "!" ]
postscarcity is unlikely to happen anyway . if nothing else , we 'll eventually run out of energy in the universe and hit the thermodynamic equilibrium point
dahpesq
Libertarian
2,016
postscarcity is unlikely to happen anyway . if nothing else , we 'll eventually run out of energy in the universe and hit the thermodynamic equilibrium point
postscarcity is unlikely to happen anyway . if nothing else , we 'll eventually run out of energy in the universe and hit the thermodynamic equilibrium point
postscarcity is unlikely to happen anyway . if nothing else , we 'll eventually run out of energy in the universe and hit the thermodynamic equilibrium point
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "postscarcity", "is", "unlikely", "to", "happen", "anyway", ".", "if", "nothing", "else", ",", "we", "'ll", "eventually", "run", "out", "of", "energy", "in", "the", "universe", "and", "hit", "the", "thermodynamic", "equilibrium", "point" ]
socialism is not the same as communism . socialism is a socioeconomic way of ordering things , vs. communism a governingpolitical way of ordering things . so you could be libertarianvery small governmentsocialist , in that you want people to mutually support each other and share resources , but you do not want the government involved any more than absolutely necessary .
d22trfk
Libertarian
2,016
socialism is not the same as communism . socialism is a socioeconomic way of ordering things , vs. communism a governingpolitical way of ordering things . so you could be libertarianvery small governmentsocialist , in that you want people to mutually support each other and share resources , but you do not want the government involved any more than absolutely necessary .
socialism is not the same as communism . socialism is a socioeconomic way of ordering things , vs. communism a governingpolitical way of ordering things . so you could be libertarianvery small governmentsocialist , in that you want people to mutually support each other and share resources , but you do not want the government involved any more than absolutely necessary .
socialism is not the same as communism . socialism is a socioeconomic way of ordering things , vs. communism a governingpolitical way of ordering things . so you could be libertarianvery small governmentsocialist , in that you want people to mutually support each other and share resources , but you do not want the government involved any more than absolutely necessary .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "socialism", "is", "not", "the", "same", "as", "communism", ".", "socialism", "is", "a", "socioeconomic", "way", "of", "ordering", "things", ",", "vs.", "communism", "a", "governingpolitical", "way", "of", "ordering", "things", ".", "so", "you", "could", "be", "libertarianvery", "small", "governmentsocialist", ",", "in", "that", "you", "want", "people", "to", "mutually", "support", "each", "other", "and", "share", "resources", ",", "but", "you", "do", "not", "want", "the", "government", "involved", "any", "more", "than", "absolutely", "necessary", "." ]
what do we call uranium mining and melt downs
czhqlou
Libertarian
2,016
what do we call uranium mining and melt downs
what do we call uranium mining and melt downs
what do we call uranium mining and melt downs
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "what", "do", "we", "call", "uranium", "mining", "and", "melt", "downs" ]
thanks so much for being willing to engage at an intellectual level . URL
d98tpf7
Libertarian
2,016
thanks so much for being willing to engage at an intellectual level . URL
thanks so much for being willing to engage at an intellectual level . URL
thanks so much for being willing to engage at an intellectual level . URL
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "thanks", "so", "much", "for", "being", "willing", "to", "engage", "at", "an", "intellectual", "level", ".", "URL" ]
yes , because lobbyists do n't exist in the real world ...
cymlvsd
Libertarian
2,016
yes , because @@lobbyists## do n't exist in the real world ...
yes , because @@lobbyists## do n't exist in the real world ...
yes , because @@lobbyists## do n't exist in the real world ...
[ "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "yes", ",", "because", "lobbyists", "do", "n't", "exist", "in", "the", "real", "world", "..." ]
most people would agree that accidental gun deaths are relevant to the discussion of whether the us has a gun problem or not .
cysfdf8
Libertarian
2,016
most people would agree that accidental gun deaths are relevant to the discussion of whether the us has a gun problem or not .
most people would agree that accidental gun deaths are relevant to the discussion of whether @@the us## has a gun problem or not .
most people would agree that accidental gun deaths are relevant to the discussion of whether @@the us## has a gun problem or not .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "most", "people", "would", "agree", "that", "accidental", "gun", "deaths", "are", "relevant", "to", "the", "discussion", "of", "whether", "the", "us", "has", "a", "gun", "problem", "or", "not", "." ]
i have already started to donate ! ! ! i was the second person to give , which made me happy . donate money and time if you really do support this amazing person , our soon to be president , gov . gary johnson !
cypj562
Libertarian
2,016
i have already started to donate ! ! ! i was the second person to give , which made me happy . donate money and time if you really do support this amazing person , our soon to be president , gov . gary johnson !
i have already started to donate ! ! ! i was the second person to give , which made me happy . donate money and time if you really do support this amazing person , our soon to be president , gov . gary johnson !
i have already started to donate ! ! ! i was the second person to give , which made me happy . donate money and time if you really do support this amazing person , our soon to be president , gov . gary johnson !
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "have", "already", "started", "to", "donate", "!", "!", "!", "i", "was", "the", "second", "person", "to", "give", ",", "which", "made", "me", "happy", ".", "donate", "money", "and", "time", "if", "you", "really", "do", "support", "this", "amazing", "person", ",", "our", "soon", "to", "be", "president", ",", "gov", ".", "gary", "johnson", "!" ]
by reducing the money supply by 13 between 1929 and 1932 turning what would have been a tough recession into a full blown catastrophe .
d7o15ch
Libertarian
2,016
by reducing the money supply by 13 between 1929 and 1932 turning what would have been a tough recession into a full blown catastrophe .
by reducing the money supply by 13 between 1929 and 1932 turning what would have been a tough recession into a full blown catastrophe .
by reducing the money supply by 13 between 1929 and 1932 turning what would have been a tough recession into a full blown catastrophe .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "by", "reducing", "the", "money", "supply", "by", "13", "between", "1929", "and", "1932", "turning", "what", "would", "have", "been", "a", "tough", "recession", "into", "a", "full", "blown", "catastrophe", "." ]
was n't there a governor some years back that vetoed every piece of legislation that hit his desk until the legislature passed a balanced budget ? pissed off the congress enough that they finally did just so they would n't have to constantly attempt to override his vetoes for every little bit of law they wanted to enact . course , i say some years ago ... might have been 50 years . ca n't recall well enough .
d9hhen0
Libertarian
2,016
was n't there a governor some years back that vetoed every piece of legislation that hit his desk until the legislature passed a balanced budget ? pissed off the @@congress## enough that they finally did just so they would n't have to constantly attempt to override his vetoes for every little bit of law they wanted to enact . course , i say some years ago ... might have been 50 years . ca n't recall well enough .
was n't there a governor some years back that vetoed every piece of legislation that hit his desk until the legislature passed a balanced budget ? pissed off the @@congress## enough that they finally did just so they would n't have to constantly attempt to override his vetoes for every little bit of law they wanted to enact . course , i say some years ago ... might have been 50 years . ca n't recall well enough .
was n't there a governor some years back that vetoed every piece of legislation that hit his desk until the legislature passed a balanced budget ? pissed off the @@congress## enough that they finally did just so they would n't have to constantly attempt to override his vetoes for every little bit of law they wanted to enact . course , i say some years ago ... might have been 50 years . ca n't recall well enough .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "was", "n't", "there", "a", "governor", "some", "years", "back", "that", "vetoed", "every", "piece", "of", "legislation", "that", "hit", "his", "desk", "until", "the", "legislature", "passed", "a", "balanced", "budget", "?", "pissed", "off", "the", "congress", "enough", "that", "they", "finally", "did", "just", "so", "they", "would", "n't", "have", "to", "constantly", "attempt", "to", "override", "his", "vetoes", "for", "every", "little", "bit", "of", "law", "they", "wanted", "to", "enact", ".", "course", ",", "i", "say", "some", "years", "ago", "...", "might", "have", "been", "50", "years", ".", "ca", "n't", "recall", "well", "enough", "." ]
2.5 of income is way less than i pay through my employer . i would n't complain about that .
czh5s71
Libertarian
2,016
2.5 of income is way less than i pay through my employer . i would n't complain about that .
2.5 of income is way less than i pay through my employer . i would n't complain about that .
2.5 of income is way less than i pay through my employer . i would n't complain about that .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "2.5", "of", "income", "is", "way", "less", "than", "i", "pay", "through", "my", "employer", ".", "i", "would", "n't", "complain", "about", "that", "." ]
maybe he would n't if most roads were n't government roads and you only had to pay for those you used , instead of paying taxes on every road .
czax2l1
Libertarian
2,016
maybe he would n't if most roads were n't government roads and you only had to pay for those you used , instead of paying taxes on every road .
maybe he would n't if most roads were n't government roads and you only had to pay for those you used , instead of paying taxes on every road .
maybe he would n't if most roads were n't government roads and you only had to pay for those you used , instead of paying taxes on every road .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "maybe", "he", "would", "n't", "if", "most", "roads", "were", "n't", "government", "roads", "and", "you", "only", "had", "to", "pay", "for", "those", "you", "used", ",", "instead", "of", "paying", "taxes", "on", "every", "road", "." ]
i mean the gun control one was a low blow . if you go hardcore libertarian the msm paints you as an uncaring asshole . the route johnson took was awkward but thankfully it was the first question and otherwise he 's been solidly on point .
d4k8gl3
Libertarian
2,016
i mean the gun control one was a low blow . if you go hardcore libertarian @@the msm## paints you as an uncaring asshole . the route johnson took was awkward but thankfully it was the first question and otherwise he 's been solidly on point .
i mean the gun control one was a low blow . if you go hardcore libertarian @@the msm## paints you as an uncaring asshole . the route johnson took was awkward but thankfully it was the first question and otherwise he 's been solidly on point .
i mean the gun control one was a low blow . if you go hardcore libertarian @@the msm## paints you as an uncaring asshole . the route johnson took was awkward but thankfully it was the first question and otherwise he 's been solidly on point .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "mean", "the", "gun", "control", "one", "was", "a", "low", "blow", ".", "if", "you", "go", "hardcore", "libertarian", "the", "msm", "paints", "you", "as", "an", "uncaring", "asshole", ".", "the", "route", "johnson", "took", "was", "awkward", "but", "thankfully", "it", "was", "the", "first", "question", "and", "otherwise", "he", "'s", "been", "solidly", "on", "point", "." ]
the tpp is a perfectly good and sensible trade deal that will lower barriers and make everyone better off in the long run . trade deals are n't 100 free trade because governments that negotiate them face various political incentives from economic interests in their own constituencies . any trade deal that could satisfy the wishes of libertarian purists would fail to meet the minimum political needs of the governments signing them . the short of it is libertarians who oppose the tpp only do so because they let the perfect become the enemy of the good .
d9c2kny
Libertarian
2,016
the tpp is a perfectly good and sensible trade deal that will lower barriers and make everyone better off in the long run . trade deals are n't 100 free trade because governments that negotiate them face various political incentives from economic interests in their own constituencies . any trade deal that could satisfy the wishes of @@libertarian purists## would fail to meet the minimum political needs of the governments signing them . the short of it is @@libertarians who oppose the tpp## only do so because they let the perfect become the enemy of the good .
the tpp is a perfectly good and sensible trade deal that will lower barriers and make everyone better off in the long run . trade deals are n't 100 free trade because governments that negotiate them face various political incentives from economic interests in their own constituencies . any trade deal that could satisfy the wishes of libertarian purists would fail to meet the minimum political needs of the governments signing them . the short of it is @@libertarians## who oppose the tpp only do so because they let the perfect become the enemy of the good .
the tpp is a perfectly good and sensible trade deal that will lower barriers and make everyone better off in the long run . trade deals are n't 100 free trade because governments that negotiate them face various political incentives from economic interests in their own constituencies . any trade deal that could satisfy the wishes of @@libertarian purists## would fail to meet the minimum political needs of the governments signing them . the short of it is @@libertarians who oppose the tpp## only do so because they let the perfect become the enemy of the good .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "B", "I", "I", "I", "I", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "the", "tpp", "is", "a", "perfectly", "good", "and", "sensible", "trade", "deal", "that", "will", "lower", "barriers", "and", "make", "everyone", "better", "off", "in", "the", "long", "run", ".", "trade", "deals", "are", "n't", "100", "free", "trade", "because", "governments", "that", "negotiate", "them", "face", "various", "political", "incentives", "from", "economic", "interests", "in", "their", "own", "constituencies", ".", "any", "trade", "deal", "that", "could", "satisfy", "the", "wishes", "of", "libertarian", "purists", "would", "fail", "to", "meet", "the", "minimum", "political", "needs", "of", "the", "governments", "signing", "them", ".", "the", "short", "of", "it", "is", "libertarians", "who", "oppose", "the", "tpp", "only", "do", "so", "because", "they", "let", "the", "perfect", "become", "the", "enemy", "of", "the", "good", "." ]
idk about f16s , but i know they have used other military items .
d0dtjx4
Libertarian
2,016
idk about f16s , but i know they have used other military items .
idk about f16s , but i know they have used other military items .
idk about f16s , but i know they have used other military items .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "idk", "about", "f16s", ",", "but", "i", "know", "they", "have", "used", "other", "military", "items", "." ]
219 comments on a post with only 67 points ? yeah , ctr and thedonald are here attacking gary .
d86x414
Libertarian
2,016
219 comments on a post with only 67 points ? yeah , ctr and thedonald are here attacking gary .
219 comments on a post with only 67 points ? yeah , ctr and thedonald are here attacking gary .
219 comments on a post with only 67 points ? yeah , ctr and thedonald are here attacking gary .
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "219", "comments", "on", "a", "post", "with", "only", "67", "points", "?", "yeah", ",", "ctr", "and", "thedonald", "are", "here", "attacking", "gary", "." ]
i really dont make a distinction between public and private prisons as it is the state who has the power to jail the citizenry . reduce the number of laws , especially where there are no victims , and release those who should not be in prison
d6havch
Libertarian
2,016
i really dont make a distinction between public and private prisons as it is the state who has the power to jail the citizenry . reduce the number of laws , especially where there are no victims , and release those who should not be in prison
i really dont make a distinction between public and private prisons as it is the state who has the power to jail the citizenry . reduce the number of laws , especially where there are no @@victims## , and release those who should not be in prison
i really dont make a distinction between public and private prisons as it is the state who has the power to jail the citizenry . reduce the number of laws , especially where there are no victims , and release those who should not be in prison
[ "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O", "O" ]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
[ "i", "really", "dont", "make", "a", "distinction", "between", "public", "and", "private", "prisons", "as", "it", "is", "the", "state", "who", "has", "the", "power", "to", "jail", "the", "citizenry", ".", "reduce", "the", "number", "of", "laws", ",", "especially", "where", "there", "are", "no", "victims", ",", "and", "release", "those", "who", "should", "not", "be", "in", "prison" ]