Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3785

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

La Búsqueda: El Diario Secreto

muchocine

Epic action-adventure that keeps the pulse at all times and catch any viewer who knows to appreciate films of rapid consumption.

After the overwhelming success that was "The search", it was hoped that the Almighty Jerry Bruckheimer put hands to work on a sequel. And so, three years later, comes to our screens "La search 2: the book secret", in which not only repeats the entire team of the first part, if not who will be joining the poster names of the recently born Helen Mirren and the versatile Ed Harris.Esta time, Ben Gates (Cage) shall wash the name of one of his ancestorsaccused of being one of the conspirators in the assassination of President Lincoln. To do this, you must discover what secret behind the newspaper owned by the real killer, John Wilkes Booth, which speaks of a treasure of unheard proportions.If something works, why change it? This must have thought Bruckheimer, Turteltaub (director, again, of the function) and company, because they repeated this blockbuster adrenalítico and enhance both the strengths and the weaknesses of the first search. Starting with a completely absurd script (special mention for the impossible encounter of Gates with the President of the United States), is presented to us as an impressive whirlwind of crazy situations in constant ascending rhythm, that while the mere idea of take it seriously seems quite far-fetched, not less true is posed by little more than two hours of pure fun.Exciting action scenes translated in persecutions, shootings or floods encourage at all times the footage, making it inevitable not immerse himself in the adventure, by very reluctant to try and be one position.And that reasons for this are not lacking. The bizarre script should add some performances well below expected that only save the correct Harris and John Voight, which seem to be the only person who really knows where have gotten. Nicolas Cage returns to prove that his Oscar was a mere coincidence and gives a deplorable work as the main character. Its already usual grimaces rises to the nth, to be too unnerving (see his face after having been photographed by a video surveillance camera). And the same is true with Helen Mirren, which reduces their performance to a succession of shouts and exorbitant looks, as well as the rest of the side.In addition, "The book secret" fails to want to resemble too (especially in its final stretch) Indiana Jones trilogy because it pales before the superb masterpieces that once parieron Spielberg and Lucas.Pero as I said at the beginning, are details that remain hopelessly in the background, in pursuit of an epic action-adventure that keeps the pulse at all times and catch any viewer who knows to appreciate films of rapid consumption. Doesn't matter the nonsense of plot based (America continues Carlton Europe's history), if in return they offer us scenes as spectacular as the persecution by the alleys of England, or which he confronts his characters to a hanging platform.Scenes, these, who enjoy in detail, that Turteltab shows that gender and wheel known in elegant and strong, without complicating life with confusing montajesLa second part of "The search" comes well prepared to become the Christmas movie, which achieved with astonishing ease, something that translates in a continuous visual delight extremely entertaining. Refrain anyone wait a minimum of plot or acting quality, that Yes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/188

Tito Chinchan

Xmen3

muchocine

Highly recommended for lovers of cinema derived from comics, given that is one of the few films of this type who really like

Well, first of all, tell the poster that has been Spain is the most ugly of all. Still, it is quite explanatory of what the film. I am very fan of the saga, remember that when we went to see the second part, arriving home we were again the first to refresh memory. By the way, before I forget, there mutants that they have to be bad for noses. For example, a gentleman which pinchos leave you on all sides must be bad by definition. Although one him out hands blades also it should be and is not. What rare.The film is about a discovery which makes a pharmaceutical company to "cure" mutations mutants, turning them into "normal". A sector of the mutant population welcomed this, while another considered that it was an aberration and is preparing to fight the human being (and step seize the world, etc). In the middle are the X-men to spread wax to anyone here. On the other hand, we have sub-plots of various characters, such as miracles, explanations incredible, deaths and other ornaments that all science fiction film self-respecting must have. And new characters everywhere.Let's enter in the field quickly. The film is a cluster of special effects, led by a quite absurd script and incredible. Okay it is a science fiction film, but the script isn't even remotely to the height. There are characters that nobody understands why are, but it is to please fans of the comics (such as for example the of the wings). They are inserted with shoehorn and that don't like to neophytes. But if we set aside the script is very weak, we have a very interesting film. The bad guys are very bad and very good good, thing to thank for not having to think. I like the amount of mutants that appear, given that each has its moment, giving the matter until a comic vis. The trouble with this is they explore them little, but better as well, but would have been too long. For special effects, the film is out, although it touches the absurdez. But who will take the brain to these movies? I brain not I took, and the eardrum it lost in the number of explosions. Incidentally, the second end of the movie is what could have saved (later of letters) that does detract from the film (by the way, I've heard to some kids that is more faithful to the comics, what things).In short, movie popcorn and flat encephalogram. Highly recommended for lovers of cinema derived from comics, given that is one of the few films of this type who really like. Nothing to do with shit like "Daredevil" or "The punisher". That Yes, if you like scripts produced with depth of character, flees to the depth that I have been treated to a little pathetic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2934

José A. Peig

Objetivo Birmania

muchocine

Formally effective and accurate in carrying out, perhaps the script suffers from schematic, logical consequence of obvious discourse, without involving a a setback as a paradigmatic.

In 1945, Raoul Walsh directed this paradigm of war movies, representation of the manifestations of essential war devoid of evaluative excesses as usual in other products of the genre, whether patriotic pretensions or anti-war proclamation. Perhaps the genre in question is his State of purity when the film material is limited to show the war and their obvious attributes. It is a story of hierarchies, of how those responsible for a higher hierarchical order using a group of subordinates to clear the way and begin the invasion of Burma in optimal time and place. The subordinate group - led by Errol Flyn too encorsetado in their militar-paternal role - progresses through the Asian jungle without being aware of all the ins and outs of the operation, develops a survival process dotted with moderate drama, and without falling into excesses sentimentaloides. The war is a collective strategy and a single drama, and Walsh puts the emphasis on the permutations of the soldier in the battle (various attacks on villages or ran up control centres) and the idea of strategy, repeatedly described the movements together with a visual composition that spared no patience and tempo in the appropriate details. In the end, an air army appears to save the heroes suffered, moment in which the covert plot reveals the manipulative nature of the hierarchy. The high command congratulates Errol by having fulfilled his mission, to which this replica showing plates of dead soldiers: "here is the price to pay". Does it worth?. The essential issue, and on which Walsh does more than suggest and open the question without driving the consciousness of the Viewer to the ideological field (as opposed to Spielberg in his "saving private Ryan").Formally effective and accurate in carrying out, perhaps the script suffers from schematic, logical consequence of obvious discourse, without involving a a setback as a paradigmatic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1050

Ramón Balcells

El señor de la guerra

muchocine

The three stars and not four I put them for a simple reason: the movie, by very good as it is, not liked as much as expected. Yes, good Yes, but a disappointing hair.

The issue of the arms trafficking in the U.S. has been treated many times útlimamente in the film. But what makes these films to not be repetitive and little original, I think that it is due to the directors. In the Lord of war, which is behind the cameras is not Michael Moore, but Andrew Niccol. The film reminds me, for the way in which tells the story of the protagonist, at the wonderful one of ours, although aunque ambas both are totally different issue dealing with. The Lord of war is a mixture of documentary, satire and drama of action featuring a cast which I must especially mention: Nicolas Cage (a great actor, but as Michael Douglas, has failed to choose many of their films), Jared Leto (young but always more than correct in all their supporting roles), Ian Holm (splendid and veteran actor)(, which will remember you for his appearance in the Lord of the rings Bilbo com), and Ethan Hawke (a young and charismatic actor who I have always loved). With respect to the history, you know that I almost never tell the sinospsis that I prefer, that if you can see the films, descubráis you all what you have to say. So would not add much else, except that found me really impressive, but perhaps you on some other touch "Hollywood". We could add other bugs as its excessive length, also. I believe that two hours are too many to count what you count Niccol. However, the film is good and is not only script slippages.Aspects such as music (which is based several fairly well-known songs), photography (which is not the most notable, but isn't bad) and the great initial credit titles (vigilant all the time to the bullet!) makes this striking film, with a terrific script, more attractive and personal.The three stars and not four I put them for a simple reason: the movie, by very good as it is, not liked as much as expected. Yes, good Yes, but a disappointing hair.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3721

Ramón Balcells

Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz)

muchocine

It is comedy to every bullet, recommended to anyone who enjoys with innovative, creative and English humor taken to extremes.

Comedy is certainly a difficult genus. They can already be made great films of this genre that never will be recognized as they should. Fatal weapon (Yes, Hot Fuzz is the original title) is the comedy of the year and probably one of the best that was made in the 20th century. I guess it is time for her to recognize as such.The film focuses on a policeman whose life is exclusively dedicated to his work. When they amount, is sent to a seemingly quiet town where, subsequently, you have to discover what mysteries according to initial proposal is very simple, even too much; but, however, it's a total nut back to all action comedy that has been done. Just have to see how the story (his screenplay is prodigious) or the myriad of gags that are perfectly added. Everything about fatal weapon is impeccable, since your technical Bill until a few memorable performances (especially that of the protagonist, a superb Simon Pegg). No, it is not easy to do a comedy like this, and that is why I admire deeply íncreible work of its director, Edgar Wright.Empezando by his hilarious dialogues, there is no doubt that we are facing a risky and personal proposal. They get to laugh with and of these, a fundamental fact in a comedy of this caliber. It has brilliant moments, others somewhat predictable (perhaps the greater failure of the film) and vibrant action sequences. It is very elaborate, fitting is extraordinary, and there is no moment in the movie where you bored. From an excellent home with many cameos to a denouement, predictable, but shocking, there is no time in fatal weapon which gives you time to breathe. It is comedy to every bullet, recommended to anyone who enjoys with innovative, creative and English humor taken to extremes.A brilliant, efficient, fast, incredibly fun film. Undoubtedly, the best comedy of the year. But, above all, for lovers of intelligent parodies. A ferocious satire on the apparently shocking action movies. This is an action movie! The others are nonsense.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3328

Kiko de España

Shootem up

muchocine

Which could have been the best movie of action of the twenty-first century is a horny divertimento pulp meets Garth Ennis, which is not little.

Shoot ' em up could have been one of the best movies of the year. He could have left stranded Bourne (it does not, that was more film) and the rest of movies of action views this season. But fails. And fails because when not Queen of the action, which is frenetic, gamberra, cutting, uninhibited, original, fun and exciting, I'm bored. "The plot" is also one more, nothing gimmicky and rocambolescas diabolic frame server expected despite being badly explained that one hard to get to understand how is it possible to not have understood something of a film as well.Pisses me off because it has aguna absolutely memorable idea which is among the coolest of the year, as the war of neons of the principle, the sex scene or the end next to the fireplace: great moments that you encabronan, because when they are already talking not cool either.Anyway this is a macarrada which seems to shot (or signed) by Garth Ennis and that makes the jungla4.0 still be more horrific.Not to mention the character of Monica Bellucci that, when he speaks in italiano-doblado, says things like Horrore.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3643

Sara Rodriguez

La brújula dorada

muchocine

"The Golden Compass" is a super production with the ingredients to entertain but without get too excited.

On 5 December was released in Spain one of the Super productions of the year, "The Golden Compass", a servant, taking advantage of the mini-vacaciones decided to go to see her, mostly motivated by my unconditional love to Nicole Kidman.Basada in "Northern lights" by Philip Pullman is part of a trilogy (to vary a little, that long ago that we have Gandalf épico-fantásticas.) and tells us how Lyra Belaqua embarks on an adventure to rescue one of his friends has been kidnapped by evil "Eaters" so-called characters while his uncle, Lord Asriel (Daniel Craig), walks around him alone on an expedition to find "the dust" particles able to join this world with the other existing dimensions. "But Mrs. Coulter and teaching will it not be easy.""The Golden Compass" is a correct adventure film to have a good time, something which, accompanied with an advertising and merchandising campaign is sent form part of the perfect formula for these dates. Includes scenes of incredible fights, a beautiful photograph and a few special effects and an atmosphere very cared for. But, while the history of the main characters is veering from a problem to another must be resolved before reaching its final destination, giving some agility to the film, from the very beginning is the feeling that have failed you take full advantage to the book. Maybe that part of the blame is the script which starts by opening too many frames in an attempt to explain the entire universe of fantasy that frames the history and presenting a vast amount of characters without deepening them too, which makes the story progress unless we have very clear why spend some things and the relevance that have certain details in the development of the same. Another thing that helps until the script stops not curdle is let pass the opportunity to dig deeper into the motivations of Lyra and the characters that help to save children and confined only to guess the metaphysical reflections touching on some details of the plot, focusing on adventures and action. Why the characters are not able to awaken in us all the empathy that would be expected and makes getting the end some abruptly showing us that there are still many things to be resolved and leaving the end too open to the two following delivery.To sum up "The Golden Compass" is a super production with the ingredients to entertain but without get too excited. Just enough to not be too child and attract well care of elders, but without moving away from the tone of the tale of sword and sorcery that appeals to children, who are, after all, that the film is directed.Let us hope that if they continue with the same cast in the next installments they know better to Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig are quite good, but could have been much better.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2990

Yojimbo

Death Proof

muchocine

As Soderbergh wanted to emulate the classic film to the Casablanca with the good German, Tarantino falls into the same trap and wants to make a tribute bypassing many of the elements that characterized those works. And in addition, bored.

After that the director had given birth one of the calving largest modern film in two parts, it is now that it enters the homesickness for the film little budget, crushed in countless projections and demented arguments.But the Soderbergh wanted to emulate the classic film to the Casablanca with the good German, Tarantino falls into the same trap and wants to make a tribute bypassing many of the elements that characterized those works. And in addition, bored.Because honor and have nostalgia for those works is not to make "your movie" adding dots and stripes with the digital effect of shift, putting posters of missing horns and using special effects which at that time were impossible. Soderbergh wanted to do something similar, but except for black and white, the rest of the film seemed one thriller which occur every day. Movements of camera? Perfect. The "chroma" or "souped" funds"? Impeccable. And sex scenes with a treatment that is not old at that time. I.e., a tribute to decaffeinated and chip now.Tarantino along with his friend Robert Rodriguez, have tried to do the same and get himself in trouble, although not precisely at the time of writing the script. Choose an actor unjustly undervalued as Kurt Russell and they put him in prota. And then a lot of very good girls see here and there and scenes of action with special effects of the first order. And it is already.The first part of Rodriguez, have not seen. But the Tarantino's if. And they are the 2 worst invested hours of these weeks. Bla, bla, bla? jijiji, lol, nonsense here and there, a final joke, conceptual and stylistic atrocities on the old movies, a part becomes black and white, another has no spots, the other many and even lost fragments?That Yes, what looks like a fact is that Quentin is what happened pipe surrounded by beautiful girls and drink with the money of the unwary who saw Kill Bill and they now will leave the rooms with this insult. And sure Quentin tells each dollar or euro with a sound of laughter.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/46

Darthz

En la cuerda floja

muchocine

Sometimes the fragile line that unites us between the dream and the reality is broken

Sometimes the fragile line that unites us between the dream and the reality is broken. The dream we pursue, the woman we love the House we look forward one day have, the music that devour us when we are sad, everything is shattered in a second is countable. And so it was the story of Johnny Cash, the revolutionary singer, which began as anyone who yearns to achieve something big, with the basics by infimum, conservatively. He worked in the field, and also came to serve the air force, up to her voice to reveal a new icon of the music country and rock 'n' roll. James Mangold brings his story to the film, the story of Johnny Cash. A film very beautiful, romantic, comparable to Brokeback are, in some respects. There are places and beautiful songs that will recall us that another great movie. The image is good and the music, as I say, splendid. At the beginning the rhythm is accelerated, and makes us a flashback to his childhood, where we will find what will be after its most significant features. His family, where we all start. Johnny had one brother, more older than him, and said its parent much more skilled in the arts of the work, to get money to feed a family of humble and poor, as those of soon and the now and always. The boy was introverted, for that reason, perhaps as everyone always do when we leave the heart to act for us, will draw afloat throughout the rebellion that had never exploded. His brother died, and already we had only the poor and incapacitated Johnny. And it will grow with the scourge of a father who treated him badly, a family that seemed not wanting to. A loneliness that always accompanies the man beyond where it will. But everything changes, everything changes when he recorded a first album. He always love the music. And as any lover of a gift or something that yearns for have known, when one takes something so intrinsically, and loves him, and appreciated it beyond more above any other knowledge or circumstance, and even more then train in this art, ends up being an artist. And that is the summary of the story of Johnny Cash. Would inevitably tend to bring up the most unsuspected his music, and with it, his biggest dream and illusion. And there also known love, the love that perhaps never had his "official" wife. He fell madly in love June Carter. And the music would accompany him until his death, as well as love. An artist as not, and reflection on what it is, an artist who lived and died in what he loved and that really believed and was still alive. That spark that all us sometimes dries and a poet, a musician, an artist of truth never him disappears, because at the most unexpected moments enhances your view and find us. Music, his music, and love, that girl that cost him his own make, but know that we loved that the reins of love is very difficult to escape. And even more of the scourge that this us then paste. But not everything is nice, sweet, and romantic, and good. Lol There is always a bad thing. Something dark. A bad stage, a bad day, a bit of bad luck. And Johnny Cash experimented it with the drug, that demon extolled with his soul because of its reliable little popularity, cocky and misleading cusp reached thanks to his good voice and its good music, but which was then followed by serious consequences. He finished very badly, really wrong, as anyone who goes through this. On a tightrope. But as already said, what really we love and gives us forces is what we will always draw of that evil self-absorption which leads to pain. In his case, eternal love to a woman, and the love of music. These strings of a guitar that would accompany it until the day in which reconcile this dream that we never woke up. A fatherly voice that susurraría you until the most recondite moments an evil phrase, a few malignant words which would be imprisoned all his life. The love of a family that actually could never behave as I would have liked a brother who died, a mother who gave birth to some of the most revolutionary music of our last century to a death of a solitary and introverted soul that eventually overflowing of rebellion. The rebel of Jhonny Cash, the solitary of Johnny Cash, the always tormented and poet and musician Johnny Cash.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1859

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Bienvenido Mr. Marshall

muchocine

Folk altarpiece of the Spain of hunger, these times now are not particularly different. There are other difficulties. It may be no hunger or censorship arguments of the revolution, but still colea the son of those Covenants.

The Spanish civil war did not last three years, although the textbooks, encyclopedias, wikipedia and some hubbub now lifted for pain of the dead, revivalista in three years of the war. Wars do not just when weapons are depuestas or a few chieftains well trajeados, smiling for the historical photo, sign a document in the light of flashes and rolls of celluloid. War seems just when faced staff hits the streets again, as said the Cuban Troubadour. Wars are wars subscription and there are none which, at its end, norm not already the germs which is nestling close to rise up and give his emboldened cry of blood. And now I've gone by the tangent and instead of talking about Spain, which is what I proposed, I finished writing generalities, applicable to Borneo and the atolls of the South Pacific Islands. Welcome Mr. Marshall is written not long after the settlement of the war. In it, there are still smell of gunpowder to backward hunger, desire to give cerrojazo to squabbles which others did not finish solve until comediado the 20th century. García Berlanga writes with nasty folk altarpiece of a Spain simple and down-to-Earth, it employed in its most intimate sediment to the Catechisms of the chieftains of the war and high policies, which were the champions of the new Spain to tow the caudillista of general Franco profile. Misery and hope, hunger and joy, intermingle in Villar del Río, the people that things would not be credible if we didn't have a (unfortunately) objective vision of what was Spain during those nearly 40 years of reductionism, bans, censorship and hunger happen.Berlanga, Communist covered by post-war needs, receives the task of making a film glamorizing the figure of singer of copla Lolita Sevilla. Along with Bardem, write a who altarpiece on the rural Spain, fed coplas Spain, the Spain stopped in time, looking with an eye to the United States.UU, called to revive the European economies, the major cultural colonizer. Altarpiece of customs truffled Comedy Italian style (miracle in Milan).Villar del Río adorns the American friend to enjoy the hospitality and the Gypsy clamor of a manchego village crossdresser in Andalusian above all things that you want to please so pleased after it rains the Plenipotentiary manna from the financial aid promised unashamedly high institutions of the State. Under the down-to-Earth and endearing baton of Pepe Isbert made Mayor of the pantomime, the entire village launches to represent the expected work, fanfare and song. Antológicamente (and is not a matter of gutting the end) nothing happens as he was believed.The paper used to shadow an Andalusian village is in the brain of his sudden Masons. Desires, in the secret hope of the yankee gold, are made in lists. There needs, but also as el capricho is legitimate. When reality overshadows the fictions, the glorious spectacle of wealth lowers to the gray routine of sadness. The villagers are happy, what remedy: are preparing with heroic enthusiasm to cope with disappointment and be solidarity, good, obedient to the cause and, finally, sentimental, humble to deal with every day that is upon them. Frozen in the idyllic vision of the American (Marshall PLan of Fund), they had no problem in PICT to achieve what wanted. As life itself. These times now are not particularly different. There are other difficulties. It may be no hunger or censorship arguments of the revolution, but still colea the son of those Covenants with the Americans and we live in a world colonized by Uncle Sam to inconceivable extremes. This miscegenation thrives and there are some governmental efforts by determining the patriotic American, distribution fees and delicate handling of numbers so that the abuse is not scandalous. And it all started with Pepe Isbert in Villa del Río; they are still in Villa del Río dressed Gypsies in a street scalloped and cheerful, waiting for the convertible Cadillacs of the benefactor of Ohio.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3183

Albert Puyuelo

The Fall

muchocine

It belt visually perfect, with a really successful style. But the content was very vacuous, was a little child.

Of all the films that passed through Sitges 2007, The Fall was which won the award for best film and which perhaps better talked about the fantasy genre. The Indian director Tarsem Singh (who now signs just as Tarsem) already had with worlds of fantasy in the cell. It was a visually perfect Ribbon, with a really successful style. But the content was very vacuous, it was a little child that mix of macabre images were the mind of a serial killer. And with his new film, Tarsem returns to fall slightly in the same mistake, neglecting the content of a story that it could have expanded a little more. The Fall is about a girl that is in a hospital for a broken arm, and goes to visit a man who has been entered by a broken leg. Is trafficking of a specialist cinema, which will explain to the girl a few fantastic stories.This film focuses above all on the history explained by the boy, leaving aside what happens (or happened) in the life of both protagonists. There are too many scenes focusing on teaching what tells the boy, and in some passage - especially in the second half - the story of the heroes is something repetitive. But Tarsem offers Visual wonders with each plane, forcing the colors or getting precious prospects The Fall is mesmerizing, and the viewer will foolishly as the girl who hears the story. This small interpreter, Catica Untaru, makes his role with a quite unusual naturalness. And, on the other hand, also deserve special attention the sequence that opens the film, a feat to slow and full of gray black and a white.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1330

Silvia

María Antonieta

muchocine

The final product has no quality that might be required to the creator of the magnificent Lost in translation. In short: a history that not just boot and once gets it just half gas.

Luxuries, champagne, jewellery, scandals, gossip, culinary, clothing feasts made with the finest fabrics, dances and festivities until sunset. The winner of an Oscar Sofia Coppola's new film reflects perfectly the excesses that lived at the Court of Versailles in the 18th century, an extreme luxury radically different from the deplorable living conditions of the rest of the French population, a luxury that led to doom to the monarchs of the place.The story, Starring Kirsten Dunst and Jason Schwartzman, focuses on the figure of Marie Antoinette, a woman who had what quickly leaving his childhood to become Queen of France. The film begins with the journey of the girl of his Austria home to the Court of Versailles where her fiance was waiting for marriage, a marriage which would be satisfied the political interests of both countries. But such an Alliance would not be effective until not born the heir of the Crown, a child that would take to birth due to the powerlessness of the Prince. It's a film risky as close to the 18th century, usually represented in very straitened way. And it is that Kings can also be impotent, although the official history is generally too complacent and tend to fudge a little reality to avoid display less convenicionales according to what. But Soffia Coppola dares to present us a vision very personal and realistic of what happened at the time of the opulent French court.The setting of the Court is perfectly recreated, spared on costumes or show all that opulence and recreating at levels notably long? very in the style of the Director - to appreciate every detail perfectly. Now, we need to ask is really essential for the understanding of the plot almost exact repetition of some scenes. The first hour of the film is completely redundant as that is an unnecessary Recreation: is necessary to repeat three times a sequence to make clear the lack of sexual understanding among the Princes?Another controversial point is the soundtrack of the film, we are accustomed to associate a type of music to an era in particular. In this case it opts for a soundtrack great but totally inadequate, according to my point of view, for the kind of film in which we find ourselves. The soundtrack includes groups such as The Strokes, The Cure, New Order and Phoenix, Siouxie And The Banshees modern. While it is true that sometimes some songs not squeaking so much, others seem to completely out of tune (as happens in the dance scene). As regards interpretations, Kirsten Dunst seems to have stalled in their role of superficial teenager. Indeed the role of a Queen who evade their responsibilities and problems in a frivolous and wasteful way look that it comes as a ring to the finger. Of the other characters there is nothing to highlight given that they are a mere accompaniment of the protagonist. However, what is commendable is the will of the Director of experimentation and reinterpretation of history, the problem is that the final product does not have the quality that might be required to the creator of the magnificent Lost in translation. In short: a history that not just boot and once gets it just half gas.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3188

J-rules

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

What have you done to John McLane? My face of outrage out of the room was Championship to see how it can be to destroy a mythical character in 2 hours of film.

At least, that have done so perfectly, and but watch as the adventure can be described to great stretches more grossing inversomilmente in the series.McLane is a victim of a new digital era, in which there is must ensure at all costs that the movie is naif and chic (with the damn blue and green filters of Wiseman), where you have to have a script superfluous, technological and unnecessary to fill footage; where the bad have to be plain and totally deadpan; and where McLane has to spend half movie going from one place to another, and where be denied at all times the function for which was invented, i.e. to fight, getting dirty and say many tacos. Of the Nakatomi McLane is well little in this delivery is only a mirage of what one day became, in which he succumbs to Hollywood and clear, can no longer be a hero that smoke and insults all living being, but that it must be thin and delicate, and by every damn we have to hear four silly little girlanything characteristic of the McLane's lifetime. In addition, with so many shades of green and blue, disappeared us the greasy and dirty McLane, which makes load throughout the film of a tontaina such as Tim Long, making freaki for pc's, although it seems that it has escaped the your American Pie or Transformers seeing humor that spends.Above, McLane is no longer human, only is a super-polícia de plastic, which comes out unscathed incredible situations (this was normal), and which is not even a scratch!, only small scratches, nothing of blood and more blood.In addition, no scene of action is already quite credible, why if one is dedicated to bring each scene shown at the end, at the end the viewer becomes insensitive to such explosion and left really believe in the film. Clear, example the versus between the F-30 and the truck. (Much ado about nothing)But worst of all, is that Willis must face the evil more deadpan, dull, and least credible of all the series, Timothy Olyohant a.k.a. Soso-man. Which it causes the same effect that kill his girlfriend, to earn the Alarcón de la Torre of penalty in the last minute. The rest is also highly worthy of criticism, but in the meantime nonsense, passes very well unnoticed. Script loose and absurd, incredible situations, slow pace for a movie of action, Wiseman only succeeds in putting the camera, why the rest is wrong, it only saves Maggie Q and halfway, and so an endless number of things more but above all, what you have missed more than less in the movie has been the tensionsomeone can tell me that they have made with her, why I have not seen anywhere.Finally, only say that if he is called, for example, Super-polícia, would have a pass as a movie action and entertainment, but as they are called La jungle , this pass disappears, and therefore becomes a zero on the left.And as I read in a blog: "the difference between (I) the jungle 4.0 BOURNE ULTIMATUM., is that BOURNE BOURNE, and MCLANE is A poly lost in the midst of so much nonsense VIDEOCLIPERA"

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/487

Kiko de España

Virgen a los 40 años

muchocine

The only downside is the duration, a comedy of 128 minutes is impossible, although waiting is reward with a few apotheosis end credits.

The best American comedy is born on SNL (Satrday Night Live) is a fact. SNL is what here LHC (La Hora Chanante), only that takes twenty years on the air. For a long time C + (Canal plus) aired, the last Saturday of the month a SNL. Since John Belushi to Jack Black, Bill Murray and Chevy Chase, everyone, without exception, have left the show.In "Virgin at 40" ownership rests with Steve Carell, which achieves a tender portrait with his Andy Stizer, this beloved Virgin of Jewish traits with some friends who wanted already to many. With coarse salt and at times not so fat is easily linking a number of laughter. The only downside is the duration, a comedy of 128 minutes is impossible, although waiting is reward with a few apotheosis end credits.A phrase: "I have nothing against the fags, I have friends who fucked them." "In prison". 8.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1696

Enrique Colmena

Concursante

muchocine

According to the sophistry of the guru, any person who receives money from a bank not only will have to repay the loan and their interests, but it also will lose all their assets; the fallacy that is not worth rejecting her is so evident.

Orensano Rodrigo Cortes is, fundamentally, an author of "video clips", and it shows in this his first feature film. The truth is that the beginning is brilliant, from a few titles of very elaborate and showy credit (so rare in Spanish film, unfortunately) until an unusual boot, with the narration in first person of the protagonist, then died an hour before the time in which the action starts. It is not that the appeal of the Narrator fiambre is particularly innovative (recall, for example, William Holden in "The twilight of the gods", the unforgettable "Sunset Boulevard"), but it is truth that is eye-catching and intriguing, especially if it truffle in this case, as experimental jueguecitos Visual in the manner of Michel Gondry in "forget of my" (see criticism in Criticalia) or Woody Allen in "Desmontando to Harry". The plot has its interest: a Professor of history of the economy, which serves three million euros by the unlikely name of Martin circus Martín, wins the highest award of the television (do though in the film always half a billion pesetas: are older than the balconies of palo?), although in kind, not in cash: a mansion of 18th centurytwo or three cars to which more cool, a light aircraft, motorcycles, travel? In short, awesome. The problem starts with a girlfriend affected by the nueva-rica - buyer-compulsive syndrome; It continues when the protagonist learns that you have to pay almost fifty percent of the prize to finance, and has no money to do so; continues when the Bank paid six hundred thousand euros (again say it in pesetas: hundreds of millions of old blondes), but pignorando you all won in the contest; (e) item with the Adviser financial are encouraged, devoted body and soul to pamphilus such fleece. In this context of unmitigated disaster, the pardillo (improbability of the script: how a Professor of history of the economy is as lerdo in economic issues?) (Do good question, I would say the director and screenwriter Rodrigo Cortes: now make me another?) It uses an antieconomicista guru and a point anti-globalization in his spare time, which preaches the good news of the absolute treachery of banks, to what the director devotes almost the rest of the footage; man, no I anyone who says that the Bank, in Spain and everywhere, not win a lot of money, but the demagogy with which the matter is here smells like it sucks. According to the sophistry of the guru, any person who receives money from a bank not only will have to repay the loan and their interests, but it also will lose all their assets; the fallacy that is not worth rejecting her is so evident. A Bank has had to make a big mess this man so that you have a very huge desire to that business, but this should not make you lose North, a story which aroused interest in the initially hollada path, that of a normal man hit by the Fortune at a time seems to smile, but you're really giving him a back stab. So, soon lost the brilliant beginning to focus exclusively on accumulate matters arguments in the diatribe antibanca, in that effort is going to Cortés full force, and the film most of its interest. Finally retrieves the thread in the scene in which the protagonist is dead (does indeed, as more avaricioso than Harpagón?), but already cannot recover lost time. There are things and details: the guru that composes Chete Lera, which even more false than a three euro coin, is a peculiar, dweller character of a House tabicada of large bundles of newspapers and a mother Catatonic that feeds on the energy that emits the TV; or Professor Santillana, the superior of the protagonist, which seems to result from a cross between the witch from snow white, Cinderella's stepmother, Miss Rotermeyer of "Heidi" and the presenter of the program "The weakest". An irregular set which confirms that if its director forgets their phobias and is dedicated to filmmaking seriously, it could be to become a world-class filmmaker.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/386

Rafa Ferrer

Clerks 2

muchocine

A rollercoaster of laughs that leave no one indifferent. Smith once again masterfully by where they came with a debtor of his previous film tape, dazzles fun and leaves very good taste.

More than curious that in my last week of Bachelor, the first film that I am going in a press (Deaplaneta thanks for your patience) pass, closely concerned the issue of marriage, by Dante, with his girlfriend's life, and its Solomonic decision.After the note than anything it has to do with the topic, but if I do not say I bust, I still return characters created by writer / director Kevin Smith; both Dante and Randal, as those who for me are the flagship of Smith, Jay & Bob the silent (the Smith).The tape, a sum inmesa of gags, that start from the first minute of projection until the last second, a rollercoaster of laughs that leave no one indifferent, so far, Smith remains in line with this tape, leaving aside the bland "Jersey Girl" taking its point geek, álguido and culminating in the dialogue of Randal about Star Wars and the Lord of the rings, as well as authorship of Kevin Smith captured in one of his characters (which has cost him the poor assume that it is no longer a chavalín-Geek of the comics, despite being the owner of 2 stores so succulent material).Ultimately, Smith once again masterfully by where they came with a debtor of his previous film tape, dazzles, fun and leaves very good taste, go, one hour and 35 minutes. good employees.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1252

Yojimbo

Manuale d'amore

muchocine

Pity that the title is no more than a title. It would be a best-seller.

I had the opportunity to see Manuale d? amore, an Italian comedy that is succeeding despite being a film modestito and simple. And could not be more predictable: the stages of love depicted in several historias.1-time enamoramientoTal the most complicated of narrating, develop and treat because there are so many ways and reasons to fall in love as individuals; so many ways to react as ways of being. In this case it opts for the crush. A guy has no luck in life meets by chance Giulia, a beautiful girl. He will go after it, will try to meet her and in this attempt many things change in your life, but not by chance. A nice story, the more idyllic. And perhaps the hardest creer.2. the crisisPero-what happens when the couple has decided to take the plunge and marry? What follows the beautiful stage of falling in love? Although it is not a desirable time, the next step is the crisis, in which defects are beginning to overcome the virtues. Love begins to dress of affection or even a minimum respect and may be considered to begin the twilight of the couple. Ways to resolve it? Two very simple: go ahead and try to fix the thing (with as many solutions as ways of love) or cut clean. If you opt for the first, the logical thing is to commit? 3.-couples traiciónMuchas opting to continue forward, but not exactly fixing their situation, but inertia do that nothing happens. But there comes a time in which someone looking for something out of wedlock. And when he discovers, comes? 4.-the abandonoAunque does not necessarily have to be for betrayal or infidelity. It may be that you fall in love more than another or another. And what you do? You suicidal? You follow ahead?When you realize as you've begun again the chapter 1.Obviamente the film is a thousand times better, is narrated with a lot more grace and is a perfect example of how to make a good comedy romantic with economy except for the script.Pity that the title is no more than a title. It would be a best-seller. But it would be one more, because for this, as for many other things, there are formulas nor manuals to use. A penalty?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1376

Tito Chinchan

Cry Wolf

muchocine

Film Institute kids giving almost the age of eternal COU repeaters, who invent a macabre game that seems to become a reality. A surprising blend of juvenile horror genre has been with a script easy to follow, a few actors that give the paste and a tension that keeps you awake.

I said my teenage sister, "take me to see that the girl with a knife on the puddle of blood" (Cry Wolf, actually said that descriptive gender does not use it much). And I thought I my himself "before I pluck an egg and I insert it by where it spoil the cucumbers". But hey, as is that these movies of fear for teenagers are cortitos, and sometimes have to invest in hermanismo, because there was no other remedy that see it.The film is a group of Institute students invent a game following a murder mystery in the village. The game consists of creating a serial killer fake, based on an email invented, to have fun with each other. But the thing is twisted when mysterious things begin to happen. Ah, I forgot that, is a closed group of friends where it comes a new. It will be an important fact? Habré wanted you give an arcane touch to something that doesn't? Keep reading and you will know.Watch that I went with reluctance, that did if not accentuate that footage progressed and all topics were coming out. Furthermore, with good possibilities to get naked, not leaving or one, which is why my morale was declining. But hey, with a not too bad actors, a protagonist that not is if acts well but has a miradita to. and an argument that holds, because the thing pulled to the front. And coming to the end, when in the two minute you said "That's the bad" you the doubts arise, then look back and say horrified "I liked Cry Wolf". Surprising, since then.In short, Film Institute kids giving almost the age of eternal COU repeaters (if I'm old, what?), who invent a macabre game that seems to become a reality. A surprising blend of juvenile horror genre has been with a script easy to follow, a few actors that give the paste and a tension that keeps you awake.I confess, I liked.Besitos.P.D: Here's an excerpt from my meeting with moviegoers anónimo:Tito Chinchan: good afternoon, my name is Tito Chinchan. moviegoers anonymous: Buenaaaaas taaaardes, Tito.TC: come to confensar something that torments me.CA: Diiiinos, Tito.TC: not it and explain it.CA: Not you preoooooocupes, Tiiiiiiiito.TC: is that. I liked Cry Wolf!CA: Ohhhh, córcholis, by the duchies of Garci, as it has happened?TC: No thing, save me, want to enjoy with Kurosawa and company.CA: We will see that it can be done.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1616

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Captivity

muchocine

Mediocre frame to frame, predictable minute by minute, inconsustancial, neutral in false appearance of novel.

Roland Joffe is not promise of quality, but has a pull supported by sober choral performances as The Mission or even the very concise and contained dramatically, despite the excesses that could have been committed, the scarlet letter or the screams of silence.Captivity (captives) takes the new batch of police telefilms to the C.S.I. its formal props. The impostada complexity makes listing of the psychological thriller that aims to its lineup and its advertising to immerse themselves in a blatant (and boring) game of false shadow puppetry where everything is what appears and nothing there is no predictability. The issue is more finely created in the collector (William Wyler, 1965). If one has seen enough movies, there is no surprise, there is no twist that dazzles us, no evidence of that are witnessing something different. It is more of the same, but on another tape. Quote C.S.I., this prodigious number of wonderful arguments, that boast of narrative concision, or unaccountably (both programmed by our private) is denying his film nature and turning it to the range of the televised. Once the film was always something infinitely more attractive than the television. Today there is no such certainties. There is a series of outstanding quality exceeding the attractiveness of the product made to turn multicine checkout. (Go no further) I am now hooked to Heroes, a more than decent review of the filmed comic but without (such as siblings of the big screen) to towering budgets and special effects of flashy (quote Spider-man or the fantastic four or The Hulk).Captivity oozes vulgarity. A vulgarity enthroned by a few characters neutral barely attractive, beyond any shred of empathy. At a time of the tape, gives us just all happens. These disturbed behaviors that plague the Billboard us have already a little tired. Basta Saws. Enough of psychopaths. No more frequented video clips of strain. Always can one find in the dvdcoteca (a word that scares) and pull the silence of the lambs. Now announce a sequel or it is a prequel to the sequel or is a (legitimate) attempt to trace the origins of evil, the primary nature of Dr. Lecter and see if boy, it was already so subtle in its bad milk, so bastard in his poetic bestiality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2676

Iñaki Bilbao

Planet Terror

muchocine

Fun, sparkling, very entertaining and enjoyable horror film, in charge of the overheated imagination of Robert Rodriguez, who get a film very entertaining and above all, very well done here.

Its special effects are perfect and combines in his desmadrado but at the same time careful script, action, horror, humor, and much, much gore. Under a very careful rickety aesthetic, where the colors are altered, the screen dancing happily, the stripes appear everywhere and screen appears it will explode at any time. That Yes, the sound is great.The revelry begins before the movie, with this false (I think) trailer for "Machete", alleged upcoming Robert Rodriguez movie, starring one of their conditional "Danny Trejo" who only see the mug one will put the hairs as hooks. A sparkling trailer full of explosive violence.And respect to "Planet terror", then that, that contains everything that a viewer of the so-called of popcorn, which in essence we are almost all, you may like: much movement, rampant action, beautiful and great girls and sex scenes, that in this case we cannot see in its entirety because as we stated at the time: we're sorry but we need this stuff. At the very moment in which the screen (like when we were kids and we often happened in intimate theaters neighborhood that good film buffs were regulars) is burned.But has more positive characteristics, as being little by little to see various friendly performers, heroes of yesteryear series Bs, as Jeff Fahey, Michael Parks.En end, that I I had frankly well, although it is not round, because in my opinion it is somewhat repetitive sometime, for example when, precisely, is it inserted the protagonist the famous machine gun in the stump of his right leg. They are a lot action moments, explosions everywhere and heavy fire, but as say something repetitive. Anyway, all very well done. There are also excellent, although something foul scenes, such as the attempted rape to the protagonist.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3542

Francisco Bellón

Hitman

muchocine

Hitman is a film that lies above the average of action cinema, and which undoubtedly will delight lovers of the genre for its explosive mix of adrenaline, intrigue, and the work of the actors.

Thirty years ago was unthinkable that a film could lead to an empire of products, but George Lucas came and gave new impetus to the merchandising in the film. And, on the other hand, is now commonplace see how are adapted to the big screen some of the most popular games from around the world, usually of action.It is a pity that time Hollywood has confined itself to action video games and has not put his eyes in other types of games that have a history worthy of the pen of the most renowned screenwriter and more elaborate. Now comes a Hitman, adaptation of the eponymous series, an exciting and fast-paced action-packed film. Sometimes it is too fast-paced and hasty, and is that there are certain sequences in which the viewer feel inside a video game, and will miss a remote control with which to control the protagonist. The argument is very basic and not very original, although it is true that not bored and that at the end and all, nor are you may require to tape much more. The work of the actors is pretty good, with a convincing Timothy Olyphant, a sober Dougray Scott and a seductive Olga Kurylenko.Hitman is a film that lies above the average of action cinema, and which undoubtedly will delight lovers of the genre for its explosive mix of adrenaline, intrigue, and the work of the actors. But fundamentally, it fulfills its primary goal, to pass the viewer awhile very entertaining and fun.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2956

Rafa Delgado

Kill Bill: Volume 1

muchocine

A divertimento round from beginning to end, deliciously well written and interpreted.

' Kill Bill: Volume 1' is the perfect example of the admirable and incredible talent of Quentin Tarantino. It is not his best work of his short filmography as a director and writer, but it is one of the best. Turns out to be a clear shows the capacity of this man, no longer only directing and writing, but when it comes to putting in scene, which ' Kill Bill: Volume 1' is having the best and brightest of entire Filmography of the American (followed closely by others, clear), resulting in a film with a fresh rhythmlight (thanks to the Division into chapters and a few messy temporary jumps very well written) to excessively frantic, full of extravagant humour and violence graphically explicit, exaggerated and sometimes unpleasant, marks of the House tarantiniana.If wasn't enough, the first volume of 'Kill Bill' turns a delicious homemade cocktail of delicious styles and favorite film genres of Tarantino, which fortunately do not make the mistake of crossing the fine line between homage/allusion and more blatant plagiarism, to adapt effectively and without complexes - turn of - exciting and epic history to not own audiovisual stylescourse of the action films made in Hong Kong.Otra of the countless virtues and Sergio Leone, Akira Kurosawa, Bruce Lee films of ' Kill Bill: Volume 1' and Quentin Tarantino is that no need for grandiloquence to describe the characters (except the de Lucy Lyu. but is this Yes needs it / deserves). You only need an own visual aspect to serve as a single move on the chessboard to describe the personality of the character being treated, although you run the risk that his characters end up being of a considerable emptiness.The only defect, if it is that you can be considered as such, is that ' Kill Bill: Volume 1' is the film "less Tarantino" this man has provided us. There are no dialogues of those that make you ask yourself what the hell is smoking the tito Quentin, and wish him xD, as the mythical "do you know what is Like a virgin?" 'Reservoir Dogs', or any 'Pulp Fiction'.In short, a round from beginning to end, deliciously well written and interpreted divertimento (enorrrrrrrme Uma Thurman). Not recommended for sensitive stomach and movie fan conservative gafapastería.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/357

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

United 93

muchocine

Paul Greengrass chooses their own version here and moves for 91 minutes, camera on his shoulder, agile and ruthless as a hungry tiger in a chicken coop, without concessions to the Viewer. A film historical, terrifying and essential.

In the end credits, the film is dedicated to all the victims of September 11. Because what United 93 shows, is a detailed recreation documentary about the events of that fateful morning. And though there are many and varied the different angles and perspectives of this shocking tragedy, all of them have a brutal dramatic power. In this case, Paul Greengrass, author also of the interesting "Bloody Sunday" or the regular "The Bourne Supremacy" focuses on the fourth aircraft hijacked on 11 September, that which, according to official sources, crashed in Pennsylvania when passengers rioted against the hijackers and tried to regain control of the flight. Greengrass plays with all the advantages that an event of this kind offers. It measured perfectly their own talent and his ability to the data and documentation to recreate faithfully and almost mathematical precision historical events. In this case, sold the film as something supposedly truthful. But only supposedly, because still there are many questions unresolved about what happened with this flight and this attack in general. Strangely appeared remnants of United 93 to eight miles of the place where supposedly crashed and, Furthermore, never were found the two black boxes that usually resist all kinds of collisions. But stranger still is the fact that official sources also ensure that either never found the black boxes of the other three aircraft.On the other hand, and despite the fact that the delay of 40 minutes this flight suffered could have provided that passengers, as in the film, they know of the tragic fate of the other hijacked airplanes and this was the trigger that prompted his mutiny, is surprising that the rebellion came exactly on the plane with less passage of the three abducted45. When the other aircraft had 64, 65 and 92 passengers respectively.There are patriotic and concerned theories that take advantage of the official version chosen by Greengrass, moreover, extol the value and heroicísmo of Americans civilians, fighting and sacrificing their own lives to save the White House. Others, however, much less attractive to the American Government, try show that the aircraft was shot down by an American fighter in order to shoot the aircraft to avoid "bad adults". Some even claim that such communications did not exist and that the airliner was shot down by mistake in those moments of chaos and confusion which in addition so faithfully portrays United 93.Nada is knows for sure yet, but Paul Greengrass chooses their own version here and moves for 91 minutes, camera on his shoulder, agile and ruthless as a hungry tiger in a chicken coop. It tells the real time events, without concessions to the Viewer. Stripping of clichés and dramatic resources his work, without any moralina or adoctrinamientos. Showing with great harshness and sobriety, on the one hand, a millimeter recreation of what have happened inside the plane and, surprise, confusion and anguish of controllers, flight, and its total lack of coordination with a State of vulnerable American Defense, slow and ineffective. Greengrass not within political positions, telling with great pulse and sense of rhythm. Exciting, crushing in the armchair to the viewer and all this, without reaching the position of one side or the other. As already noted at the beginning, in the end credits, the film is dedicated to all the victims of September 11. For this reason, when the kidnappers understand the true situation have resulted and abductees, prisoners of fear and despair, begin to act under the purest and animal instinct of survival, some pray frightened to wing in the cockpit, while the others pray to Jesus in the rear of an aircraft in free fall. A film historical, terrifying and essential.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1933

Ramón Balcells

La fuente de la vida

muchocine

The source of life has some of the most impressive scenes never before seen in a movie.

A whole blog would be required to discuss the source of life, the new film by Darren Aronofsky controversial Fund. I have not seen neither Pi and Requiem for a dream, but I do not think it takes to understand (if this applies) the third work of the director. And it is that it is not only to understand his work, but entering it, feel it. You could say that you love or hate her, although he does not want to say that you or a masterpiece or a crappy. The film is neither one thing nor another, but is, rather, an extrañísimo story, beautiful in every sense and full of anecdotes and really intended details of which you must forget more than one. The source of life is not only a moral, a lesson of life, of its challenges, but also a poem made into images. Such poetry can be seen in virtually all the footage, because its rhythm and structure, repetitive, slow altogether and beautiful invoice are assimilated to any poetry of a level that exceeds what is acceptable.The film of Aronofsky's pedantic, weird, boring, embarrassing can you condemn? Yes, are you can condemn, even if it is not, nor much less. This is a film, without doubt any original, strange, formal, repetitive, bonito, etc. I may not have reason, because as I said earlier, the love or hate her, but thinking about it well, at least I think this is the most risky proposal of the year. I don't want to dwell too much, as this is a film that has to see and enjoy, and fewer things to know it before viewing it, more her you apreciarás.Say, first of all, that the script is good, no more. What here stands out above all the direction and originality of Aronofsky is clear. It is true that without a script, the film would not exist, but it is here that the aesthetics and how is told is what truly stands out. The source of life has some of the most impressive scenes never before seen in a movie, such as, for example, of Thomas (a huge Hugh Jackman in the middle ages) hallucinating with the wise from the tree, absorbing her and aprobechándola with the intention that does not end. No doubt, this is one of the key scenes, which defines the human being in a perfect way, spectacular and, finally, as it must be realistic. Secondly, I would highlight the moment when Izzy (Rachel Weisz) tells everything about the last chapter of the book Tommy at the hospital. This is a film that is sure of itself, which does not want to be pretentious. Its aim is to reach people this direct message to "enjoy the time", talk to us, in passing, of love, real love and ask ourselves the question of whether there is eternal love. So that we have a bet incredibly deep (too!), full of wisdom and understanding.The interpretations it reprocharía nothing, absolutely nothing. Hugh Jackman is better than ever, in a role extremely complicated and difficult to interpret. Although it would not wrong saying that Rachel Weisz is even better than him, in an interpretation complex, risky and with a hope of immortality, that soon fades (go spolier!). Both performers show an incredibly realistic chemistry, full of nuances and sense (who not are always of Weisz Queen?). Another aspect in favour would be the superb music of Clint Mansell, with a main theme absolutely heartbreaking and exciting. This would be the third best performance of the work, the music.As only drawback would add the lack of sense that have some images, or at least that I do not understand. You can know what is this kind of medal that appears during several sequences! I do not know, will be paranoia? And perhaps that is too excessive, at times seems you do to explode the head of so much light. But well, as you can see, these small notes are really insignificant for the immense quality of the film as a whole.A wonderful film, deep until no longer to be him more, beautiful, exciting, complex, incredibly developed and with a pair of performances that deserve a big round of applause, as well as the address of Mr Aronofsky, which I will have slope throughout my eternal life. Requiem for a dream!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2768

Tito Chinchan

28 semanas después

muchocine

Apocalyptic film about how a virus rock humanity for don't know what reason. Great tomato sauce that I would say my mother-in-law, some scares, and a script to the height of a resecuela. I do not like.

Madrugda, Madrid, August late Monday. The deserted city. Smart few drivers who dare to tread the streets do so cautiously. They know that a virús is loose. Rumours, have heard by radio, television, nothing for sure. I pushed the Tome of concrete and glass. At the door, a metallic voice asking for the key. "I have come to make a guard, cagonmismuertos". The chancel is opened. Everything in the dark, a little light in the background with a seated figure. Asked me for accreditation, and I feel, when I go, as a smile. The night will be long, since then. And of course that I do not understand as the seguratas they shit not fear in these night guards. It canguele.The film is about a man that, faced with the diatribe that eat the stumps a few zombies or save his wife, decided to leave it to their fate. Time passed, Great Britain is recovering normality after a lethal virus that returns to the thirsty people in blood (it is not football, but more or less). Really only have assured a small parcel, with snipers on all sides to avoid entering the zombies. In these, the sons of the Lord before decide to escape plot, go to his former home, meet his mother and back accompanied by the "fortress". what want tell you? For me, there are two types of terror. On the one hand, of the scares and the other on the blood. This is the second, and I do not like. The script seems to me that it is flagging by the edges. Ahead, with security that seems the pussy of the Bernarda. And behind, the tontez end to tell us as you have box office, we quarter. It has as a positive thing that not only give us fear by dark, if not that the zombies come to full light of day to eat brains. This is positive. That Yes, what the hell want the zombies? Dan a bocao one and go for another. This is a marraneo. If see you my grandmother gives them a Campion that fuses them by marranos.In short, apocalyptic film about how a virus rock humanity for don't know what reason. Great tomato sauce that I would say my mother-in-law, some scares, and a script to the height of a resecuela. I do not like.Besitos.P.D: I will admit it. I spent all night without sleep shit scary. I had to go to sleep with my baby that I protected the zombie. I cannot see neither one of these!Pd2: Come, there are two helicopter scenes that I quite liked. Especially the first, flying over the city, very good (though not original).P.D.3: The time of handkerchief and laying mucus spare you to a movie, right?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3265

Jeremy Fox

Supersalidos

muchocine

The adventures living in a night the protagonists are really fun. But nor let the laughter we cheat, the film is not no wonder and has serious problems of rhythm.

"Supersalidos", very bad and somewhat perverse translation of the original title "Superbad", is a film that didn't go to see. The comedies of the type "American pie" or I am not interested in "Porky's" (in fact have not seen any of the two) and the lack of time, endemic evil of our time, forces me to choose what I see or public. Finally, thanks to the gentle invitation of Sony Pictures Spain and via muchocine.net had the opportunity to attend a press pass at the superb facilities of the aforementioned company in Madrid.Y there, I took a surprise on surprise, but surprise. Relative because those who hate this genre are going to hate this movie and those who worship going to an idol. Surprise because we are between these two positions are those who can leave surprised the film. And this for several reasons.First because the title is somewhat misleading. The story focuses on three hatched teenagers, Yes, on the other hand almost all adolescents (for what cheat us?). But is the search for the alcohol for a party, in a country in which children under 21 years of age can not buy it, which focuses much of the film.The other major topic of the tape is the friendship between Seth (Jonah Hill) and Evan (Michael Cera), alter egos of the writers Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, which will be put to the test to the admission in different universities which, in turn, will lead to some point's unexpected good cinema. Attention, by the way, to the possible connotations gay history.The adventures living in a night the protagonists are really fun (advise going to the cinema in gang because this is the typical movie that can be enjoyed more so). Especially good are the scenes planned on situations before the purely verbal, simplistic and based on the alleged grace of the swearing words of the protagonists (although some have his joke in general are repetitive).But what I think it will be especially remembered, out of the film, is the scene of the liquor store (say no more) and everything about the funniest movie character: McLovin (Christopher Mintz-Plasse). To his around the most hilarious scenes take place to the extent that, without being the main character, becomes the real owner of the role. It is difficult to end up not being a fan of McLovin.Pero neither let the laughter we fooled, the film is not no wonder and has serious problems of rhythm. Both at the global level, the movie takes enough to boot, is too long and has slippages worrying level internal rate of some of the scenes that make long and either take in arise either in resolved.These defects cause the whole is somewhat irregular and alternate the laughter with a slight boredom. If we add this to the film's low claims, we will reach the conclusion that the movie is simply correct. What, on the other hand, is much more than I expected.Final assessment in moonfleet: 5.5 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3658

Ana Belén Pacheco

Eagle Vs Shark

muchocine

I feel dislike pure and hard towards this kind of grotesque comedy boring and without grace. It has managed to terrify me both in fact believe that it will happen to be the worst thriller of 2007-8 on my list of clunkers unbearable.

Lily is a geek and Jarrod another even greater geek. She works in an ersatz currísimo McDonalds and its highest aspiration is to take orders to Jarrod going to eat on a daily basis to your store that he works in a nearby electronics business. When Lily is dismissed from his job decides that geeks are born to be United and begin a relationship in a peculiar fancy dress ball.I feel dislike pure and hard towards this kind of grotesque comedy boring and without grace. I encentro not a glimpse of brilliance in their dialogues and its protagonists, sorry but it is that I can not help it, they are so ugly and strange to they did me want to leave the room everytime they did a close-up. This "thing" made in New Zealand has managed to terrify me so much in fact I think that it will happen to be the worst thriller of 2007-8 on my list of clunkers unbearable.As I have seen some dare to call the great Indie film Ochentenos, revolutionize them and say that the indie film does not have that catch failed geeks and bore us with his life, in fact notice to all the fan of the absurd comedy because its poster (at least the Irish) can lead to error and obnubilar to have you inside the room from where it is already harder to flee. Isn't Indie film, is a species of short lengthened with a crappy Bill nauseam and nothing to offer on the other side of the balance. With these thoughts here while I try to take off my eyes or inflate to painkillers to overcome this tape.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3012

Lady Winter

Sin reservas

muchocine

It has all the basic ingredients to get a romantic comedy to use as a result. A sincere movie that promises no more that what he gives and it works.

Without reservation has all the basic ingredients to get a romantic comedy to use as a result. Their argument, as in every movie of this genre, is summarized with certain simplicity. Girl meets boy (or vice versa) and fall in love before passage of a series of drawbacks and altercations that put you a little pepper to the relationship. And all this cooked over low heat, for that the protagonists are chefs and the film takes place almost entirely by between fogones.cuenta with all the basic ingredients to get a romantic comedy to use as a result. Their argument, as in every movie of this genre, is summarized with certain simplicity. Girl meets boy (or vice versa) and fall in love before passage of a series of drawbacks and altercations that put you a little pepper to the relationship. And all this cooked over low heat, for that the protagonists are chefs and the film takes place almost altogether between Firebox. Catherine Zeta-Jones serves as Queen of the kitchen in a restaurant with great success where the customers crowd at the gates in search of a table free in which to taste his delicious creations. A life fraught with professional success, but empty personally. What forced to attend visit a psychoanalyst to help you improve in the face to face on a regular basis. With a schedule squares and organized to the smallest detail, any novelty can make his fragile emotional state unravel. That is why the intrusion in his life of his niece (that has to take charge after the death of his sister) and a companion of pans fond of pasta will make change the course. Zeta-Jones, and only she, is the real protagonist. Superb in his role of young beauty and cranky control load on his shoulders the weight of the film, in which Aaron Eckhart guaperas course (for tastes the colors were made) puts the histrionics to the plot with its outputs everything. History does not give much of itself that it endorses, as it is usual in the romantic comedies, the principle that opposite poles attract. From there, everything are topicazos the spectator has seen over and over again and which will see not in much. Hard girl which a crazy young man is able to soften. Girl that awakens the tenderness of his responsible for aunt. The stress of modern life. The difficult task of reconciling work and professional life. And so on. And all dressed with an Italian tone that is breathed in every level (music and food mainly). The best advice that can be given to those who come to the cinema to see without reservations is that go with a full stomach, since, otherwise, they will leave the theater with an insatiable appetite. This and that they go with the security that will be found with a sincere movie that promises no more that what he gives and it works.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2004

Iñaki Bilbao

Demasiados secretos para un hombre sólo

muchocine

Funny film of intrigue that deserved better luck. Intelligent, although rather strange film of intrigue. It is actually a comedy, although it does too much grace.

"A psychiatrist is hired to deal with the very President of the United States." The acceptance for it is a challenge, but little by little check such work takes away all the freedom that possessed. Before this, he decides to escape. "But both the C.I.A. and the F.B.I. and foreign powers want to capture him or kill him, before qu rebel secrets told the President".Intelligent, although rather strange film of intrigue. It is actually a comedy, although it does too much grace. However, history has a chance, and James Coburn does very well. But overall, the tape is not another Thursday. Criticism has always said this film which has a delusional and unexpected end. The first thing is true, but the second thing better not speak.But technical aspects, as the Mise en scène, with good lighting and sound montage as well as art direction, are worthy and have a patina of originality. At least they depart from normal, until then.A movie that could have been better, but that is at least bring something new to the film of political intrigue.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3461

Andrés Pons

Negra Navidad

muchocine

Two parallel stories intersect with great dynamism in this good film that works perfectly with what is expected of him, surprising for his brutality in an era where raw correction.

We are clear that the lack of ideas in the horror and cinema in general are trying to cover with REMAKES to hundreds of old cult films. At is time touches the revision of a notable SLASHER led in the mid-1970s by the director of "PORKIS" "BOB CLARK" in early career showed a great talent for terror both with this film or the same year DEATHDREAM. Then would come unfortunately for fans to the genre into a spiral of increasingly less interesting comedies.As for example "KARATE DOG or small great HEROES" this review of one of their first films seems one of these REMAKES entering by the front door as we enjoy with "LA massacre DE TEZAS or the dawn of the dead" in recent years. Rookie GLEN MORGAN is not engaged in copying and puts a sick air at all times, with a few murders full of nasty recovering Al GORE and the oppressive atmosphere of the golden age of the genre.Two parallel stories intersect with great dynamism in this good film that works perfectly with what is expected of him, surprising for his brutality in an era where raw correction.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/587

Oscar Cantero

Los bingueros

muchocine

It really is a hodgepodge of film, as most of the time to uncover, but nonetheless be a benchmark and a portrait of the Spain of the moment. In addition to great affection, save a place of honor in my collection of movies.

I have always said that there are two parties in question of film criticism: the first, that on the basis of objective criteria issued a verdict; and the second is that regardless of the correction or discrepancy with respect to the usual precepts, appreciates the final result of the production, valuing the effect produced on the audience and focuses on a particular public changing depending on the time and situation. As well, once clarified these points, and in reference to the film "Los Lizenz", I have no other comment on their development: it is one of the films that marked my childhood and her I still have recorded on VHS, that even though a person little fond the comedy, I cannot help but have me everytime I remember specific scenes of her, and is certainly much more witty at times multi-million dollar productions today in day are exported to the world with portentous campaigns. The picture of two beings picturesque Esteso, marvelously escorted by the inimitable Ozores and Pajares is something anyone will keep in their retinas for the remains. It really is a hodgepodge of film, as most of the time to uncover, but does not stop being a reference and a portrait of the Spain of the moment, and without doubt, an opportunity to enjoy a humor uncouth and simplistic, but greater ingenuity than which today offer us. In addition to great affection, save a place of honor in my collection of movies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2915

Rafa Ferrer

Miguel y William

muchocine

An experiment is simple, and stupidly mundane (and boring) comicamente.

The other day at lunch he revisionaba (Yes, I have a tape of 4 hours on LP with a lot of programs) of NST (night without truce) and I found that Malena arteriovenous and the Director of this film that brings us today, Agnes Paris, had been invited to one of them at the time of its release in theaters.The truth is that had had the opportunity of seeing the film in a press pass, but they finally and for reasons I do not come to the case, not I went to the same, and nor I had the slightest interest or the slightest concern towards the film, until I saw pictures on this programme and the interview of rigour than the illustrious Matthew Dani made them.Said Ines Paris, perhaps, the tape would both convince to youth, which would be that they ended up reading both Cervantes and Shakespeare. Sincerely Ines with hand on heart and all the possible sincerity that fits in my stubborn calva, if to read Shakespeare (which I have read more than D.Miguel, and it is that in fact the Quixote so I have not read, or think do) need movies like this. I turned off and vamonos; now I am in charge I take the key and throw it to the farthest possible River.And is that the film, starring Elena Anaya, Juan Luis Galiardo, Wil Kemp and Malena Alterio and José Pou, is nothing more than a farce of those that years film to they interpreted in the corrales, corralas or as God so call yesteryear (now theatres), and is, my lady, is needed more packaging than a pair of farts, burping, cacas, ass and 4 jokes, even appearing in tapes of Pajares, Esteso and Ozores.En some bars of the film I have had the same feeling when I saw those of Asterix, and the script we showed as such or which thing had been "guilt" of these Gallic geniuses; as well, in "Miguel y William" there are continuous references Cross (and, at the same time invented) about the life of both and as ideas of one or the other they are carried works of Cervantes or Shakespeare, that okay, understand that they are "tricks" of the writer, but arrive tired, by his excessive repetition.Did not want to end without stress or beat, the performances of performers, that I always say with the ubiquitous (and in the interpretiva plot), and is that, perhaps I stay alone with Will Kemp, very nice as Shakespeare, Helena Anaya (is this girl got me cattle with those eyes has.), Juan Luis Galiardo as a "viejuno" Cervantes andon all arteriovenous Malena, which I had used to seeing her in his comic vis and as "good" and here is the villain of the function; It's nice to see her in another plot.On the costume, I think horrendous, while highlighted the costumes for "Teresa in the body of Christ", here, seems worthy of Agatha Ruiz de la prada, in this case the costume designer Sonia Grande makes the canelo in clothes that are the protagonists, and "emperifolla", Helena Anaya, and Malena arteriovenous and leaves with some sad and horrendous robes to the rest, as wanting to give interest to female characters, wasted by the script, especially in that resident machismo in the middle ages.In short, an experiment is simple, and stupidly mundane (and boring) comicamente.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4375

Christian Sandoval

Lifeboat

muchocine

"The end justifies the means"

"Lifeboat" (1944), is a film that mixes drama with moments of suspense, of the English director Alfred Hitchcock, set in the second world war, which tells the story of a group of people who are in a boat lifeboats, once the ship which were passengers, was sunk by a German submarine, which was also destroyed. The tension increases when they rescue water to a crew member of the German submarine, sowing mistrust in some of the crew of the pot life.The creation of the script was not an easy task. John Steinbeck, writer who had some standing, but that did not yet work to leave in accordance with the director commissioned the work. For this reason, it was decided to hire Mac Kinley singer, another writer of renown, which only lasted 2 weeks working with the director. The person to replace would be Jo Swerling, who had previously worked with director Frank Capra. Despite all these hires. Hitchcock was not satisfied with the work done, because it was that the sequences of the film did not contain further tension, so it can guess that much of the script was building himself Director.The film shows how a group of people who are faced with an extreme situation, in a confined space, vary their behavior, showing the darkest and most elementary of each side. In such an environment, all lost something, from a baby to a leg, that somehow causes, so the sense of helplessness grows, as your only means of escape is the immensity of the sea, at the same time, is also what imprisons them in a small environment. An example is the change suffered by the protagonist of the film, Tallulah Bankhead, who personifies a journalist rather cold and materialistic, which places their professional development above all. This character during the course of the film, loses all things that seem to make sense of his life, this goes from his camera, to their most precious jewels. The loss of these objects represents the loss of the elements that give meaning to his life.The moments of greatest tension are achieved thanks to the incorporation of Walter Slezak, who is representing the German sailor rescued by the castaways. This character is both executioner and victim of the rest of the castaways. He symbolizes the war that is living, going to be a "prisoner of war", to command the boat suddenly. Continually the rest of the crew is enfrascará in discussions, with 2 sides clearly defined, those who are willing to collaborate with the agent enemy and those who only see German as responsible for the situation in which are to survive. Interestingly, the film at the time was heavily criticized, because according to the specialists of the time, gave him a profile "positive" to the German character. The truth is that you see the film, see the German character is completely opposite to that, is manipulative and calculating, showing an incredible coldness in the scene where is given to understand that the baby had rescued had died.What is undeniable, now that Hitchcock undertakes to show that evil resides in all of us. The "allies" because of the different situations that are unfolding in the course of the film, are taken to commit atrocities, ending as people that behave more like animals, totally by his instincts. The only one that does not fall completely into this vortex is the waiter of color, starred Canada Lee. Both the employment and the position it occupies inside of the shipwrecked vessel, indicates the position they occupied persons of black race in American society in those years.Another fact to emphasize is the lack or absence of soundtrack, this was because Hitchcock wanted to make the only tangible sound of the sea. This plus there were only a couple of planes out of the boat, in fact subsidence only extend known indirectly, either by you talk or by objects that are floating in the beginning of the film. With this was that the viewer felt somehow as part of the crew.The director this time, gave us a film where the question if save or not the castaways, it crosses all the work. The interesting thing is that this is not the only question that arises during the film. Hitch was commissioned to go featuring several conflict situations that present any question. For example, will survive the amputee character? or who will win the power struggle inside the pot, the German or the rest of the crew?. While it is not one of the "best-known" films of the director, it is undoubtedly an important work in the films of Hitchcock. The film can be seen as a critique of the context in which unfolds the story, in which prevails the instinct of survival above the humanity of the characters, as also a criticism of American industry, where they were used to exalt the characters representing your country no matter the kind of atrocities that could commit.As virtually all films of the director, this is one you should be viewing Yes or Yes, because it is a jewel of the English director, which eventually reached the recognition he deserved.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3104

Oscar Cantero

La caldera del infierno

muchocine

A good movie that picks up the inheritance of the tradition of horror film classic, with spirits, gloomy scenarios and a backstory that is not revealed until the end of the plot.

The caldera of hell is one of those films who resort to the subgenus classic and at the same time powerful of horror movies, and it is the spirits and entities that interact between the more than and our world. Uses for this, in addition, an environment so conducive and prone to do this as it is an old criminal with a long record of deaths, killings and suicides to their backs. At any given time, begins the rehabilitation of a wing that has been closed for 50 years, and is there when it began to increase exponentially the number of deaths, although officially attributed to suicide, occurring under mysterious circumstances. This involves engagement of a detective who with the help of the prison doctor will start an investigation that takes them to unimaginable situations.The film follows the tradition of the cinema classic horror, with gloomy scenarios, unexpected surprises, constant uncertainty and others, but without recourse, Yes, the blood and the guts to cause these sensations. Unused, in short, what Tito Chinchan define no doubt as "offal". On the other hand, the soundtrack has been chosen with success, so to view the film, the viewer not excessively repaired it, but feels that he contributes to intensify the sensations that transmits the film, but without advance them, as it is the case on many occasions today.In general, is that the caldera of hell is a good movie, that takes the best elements to make a product complete, accurate and correct, heir of classic horror that we both Miss the tradition today.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1889

Ramón Besonias

Sunshine

muchocine

Do in Sunshine, the lead torpor provoked perhaps due to its proximity to the Sun numbs the interest of a viewer want to that soon, as soon as possible, everything is reduced to what? according to its writer-all are: dust, only that, star dust.

The genre of science fiction has swung from a few decades ago in the demanding frontier that unites a cinema of leisure and popcorn? descreído of dialogues Grand and more excited about the bait offered by aliens, termineitors and any other creatures acampen thirsty by the screen - with another film pertrechado of intellectual openwork bandwidth issues, debtors of the discourse which flooded with great success its literary references, but transported to filmic language can numb the passion of the most naïve Viewer.This Lair to unite show and message have contributed excellent work? solidified some as myths of the seventh art-yes they got in his day (and still get) be been reread with enthusiasm and critical interest. These include the upper Blade Runner, 2001: an Odyssey of the space and encounters in the third stage, or the more recent but also interesting Gattaca, twelve monkeys and Minority Report.A some of these gems seem to have paid tribute the unequal Danny Boyle in his mediocre Sunshine, thereby building a spectacular script (the ink of Alex Garland, also responsible for the most interesting 28 days later) no feet or head, whose only contribution lies in the beauty of his images (which isn't anything significant) and the wisdom of focusing its narrative and aesthetic interest in the figure of the Sun - Star little used in this genre - and not in planets showy and disturbing as the Moon or Marte. Even so, even their contribution parasitizes (with dignity) spaces, times, and illuminations present already in the masterpiece of Kubrick. And the presentation nothing disturbing fifth passenger is close to the only entertaining final horizon of Anderson to the terrifying Scott.Boyle Alien overestimates, signing a pretentious and tiresome, product should be fun without sentencing, and rather than the reverse as well happens. A real shame, because the chosen environment was successful and commendable visual beauty (should not be forgotten that the firm Alwin H. Kuchler, present photography also in the poetic code 46 of Winterbottom). Perhaps history would have given more than itself emphasizing the mythological seduction by the Sun? as does the also unequal Soderbergh Solaris with its enigmatic planet-no monsters running around the ship, dispatching shamelessly one by one to each crew member. Or, perhaps he would not have been wise to decline the action by terror, deleting the script misticismos and other intellectual refinements. I do not know, I do not decide, but what I am clear is that when Boyle gives you by mixing ingredients salad was sour, while shipped separately from insurance would have been delicious.It will be why I like both Trainspotting, because in it there is no more ice cream than that puts on the capirucho and born with a desire to have fun, avoiding dramatize or poetizar the scene of drug use. Everything is agile and thug in Trainspotting: music, its images, the dialogues, all.Do in Sunshine, the lead torpor provoked perhaps due to its proximity to the Sun numbs the interest of a viewer want to that soon, as soon as possible, everything is reduced to what? according to its writer-all are: dust, only that, star dust.What pleasure to enjoy the decent secondary Cliff Curtis, incidentally, out of their cartoon of malicious terrorist? although, how not (sends the America of political correctness), be it aired the first-, or that Asian bellezón is Michelle Yeoh (memoirs of a geisha, Tiger and Dragon, tomorrow never dies), whose pose of sculpted seriously weakens my will and strengthens while other faculties of less noble noun.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2459

Ramón Besonias

Transformers

muchocine

Transformers shows that the humor of our societies has changed: the impropriety of policy or the irony without blood have gone to audiovisual conservativism that although is more realistic in the staging of the action, soon becomes an empty show that chokes the emotion for the benefit of the box office.

I take the appearance - not enough but always necessary in summer - the refreshing audiovisual attraction of this Fireworks seller who is Michael Bay (the rock, island, are even their own infumables Pearl Harbor and Armageddon) to remember (perhaps this just more into years and engullidas movies public endure the 144 minutes this inconsequential circus and only bearable isolated scenes) the trajectory of a master of entertainment as Joe Dante, whose master to make fun and innocent movies still leaves a mark on those who we were lucky if teenagers back in the eighties.Transformers is good only when it smells like Dante, when their robots remind us of the naif irony and the antics of the Gremlins, or heroism without small soldiers dead. And the introduction to the first love through the crazy and amazing adventure has echoes of the prodigious chip and above all Gremlins. The scene in which the protagonist must go home to retrieve the glasses is pure Dante. The forced verbiage of robots that seem more about pets as the saviours of the free world is pure Dante (even if in this film runs all its freshness neglected by a script and a rhythm without the child naturalness of the master). In Transformers the exaggeration of some prodigious (and perhaps the best) FX dilutes the freshness and disperses the attention about the epic teenager Yes worked with Dante and came even excite.Transformers is trying to attract with cars (what a disappointment the conversion of the ramshackle and humanized second hand in a dazzling Chevrolet Camaro car) and girl removes the breath and other things (Megan Fox is so tasty in their as tasteless kinetics in his interpretation) to the young audience, which soon will feel identified with the protagonist, a smart guy with a sense of humor but two candles. However Dante magic is what you have; everything transforms him through the adventure and soon the young man in search of his identity will find her trying to save the world? (even in this Transformers is diluted in a 2 Armageddon). With Dante nobody wants to save the world; enough adventure. The eighties optimism of the mark Dante knew that, as in the indianescas films of Spielberg (for true, co-producer of the tape), while the character run, jump, flee, Kiss and rescue the emotion is assured. The rest is enough, even the digital FX. Why the character of Martin Short in the final scene of the prodigious chip does not return to his old life, but that runs after another mission that makes you feel alive.Transformers robs their characters for a famous series of Japanese TV that back in the 1980s became a sensation and anticipated what is now an explosion manga that trasversa film entertainment made in USA (including Tarantino). And it shy combines the coldness of the machine with the anthropomorphic irony that makes us accessible and exciting adventure of the robots. Although this I prefer the endearing rivalry of the R2D2 and C3PO, Grump even naïve teenager vitality of Johnny 5 in short circuit (John Badham, 1986), the Sayonara baby of the insensitive Terminator or the heroism of the endearing Buzz Lightyear (Toy Story, 1995).And is that Transformers demonstrates that the humor of our societies has changed: of the impropriety policy, the irony without blood or nudity without condoms of the eighties, have gone to an audiovisual conservatism which although is more realistic in the staging of the action, soon becomes an empty show that chokes the emotion for the benefit of the box office.The best: the scene in which the protagonist must go home to retrieve the glasses. Without a doubt, Shia LaBeouf. An actor without much transmitting a naturalness and incredible proximity. The more than obvious knowledge of mechanics of Megan Fox. The realism of the CGI digital effects, a prodigy of technique, imagination and pacienciaLa scene of the girl in the pool (very to the style of the King Kong of Jackson or girl with Shyamalan water). Perhaps Transformers would have been a great film in key to terror, perhaps.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4324

Moebius

El hombre que pudo reinar

muchocine

The man who would be King, is a film as immortal as the cinema itself, one of the jewels in the Crown of the adventure genre.

Shoot this film meant for John Huston fulfill his long desire to bring to the big screen the work of Rudyard Kipling's The Man Who Would Be King. He led several scripts and nearly two decades achieving a definitive version of the story, and find the ideal actors for the project. Initially Huston had wanted to take Humphrey Bogart and Clark Gable (sounds really good!), but time passed and his great friend Bogart and the most famous orejudo Hollywood died. He also thought Burt Lancaster and Kirk Douglas. The project continued postponing, until that in the 1970s Huston contacted the most famous pair of actors of his time, Paul Newman and Robert Redford. Newman rightly advised Huston hired British actors. It was just as he reached two actors whose chemistry on the big screen was such that left the Hindukush to the height of a small pebble. The faltering figure of a beggar breaks the silence that surrounds the young journalist Rudyard Kipling. Between the shadows a figure supported by a cane is heavily moving towards the amazed Editor. The beggar calls sacir water for their thirst. "No I know?", she asked. Kipling answers negatively, and then gives you drink. "Here decided here was, in this room, do you remember?" Danny and I signed the contract and you witnessed. You were here, I there, and Danny here. "Do you remember?" The journalist finally recognizes him. "Carnehan!". The beggar that day was a proud British continues: "Peachy Taliaferro Carnehan." Follow mirándonme, so it will not escape my soul. "" Carnehan!", repeats an amazed Kipling." "The same", answers Peachy, "and not the same one who was at his side in a wagon train of Marwar first three summers and a thousand years ago". And a flashback to a railway station three years ago he began one of the definitive adventure films. The man who would be King tells the story of a friendship and a time where much of the world was still a mystery and romanticism of the danger and what remained to be discovered were still possible. It was a time that the white man was confident in itself and in its technology to open passage between forests and mountains and lower towns that were destined to be dominated by the great Christian power. And between the man white power to fear was Great Britain. In a India recently subjugated by Victorian England a Rascal former military and Mason, Peachy Carnehan, survives emptying their pockets to English and rich confused. A young man dressed in white, thin, being glasses and a thin moustache, he steals a gold watch while buying a train ticket. When it considers the symbol that crowns the clock chain he curses his fate. Just steal a fellow Mason. When you try to return it so the traveller already is in his wagon. Peachy he seeks and gets to it. You know there has been stolen from a writer and journalist, Rudyard Kipling. Peachy will try to return the watch while it knows, but when an Indian ricachón rises to the carriage accompanied by a watermelon their plans will be ruined. Neither short nor lazy it will use to blame the Hindu of theft and throw it on the train. Kipling will tell you it threw under the clock at the station. But between masons, it forgives everything. Later Kipling were are with Danny, a burly ex-suboficial of large sideburns that journalist should deliver a message. Danny and Peachy, both former army of his Majesty, after almost stepping on the prison to blackmail a Sultan, will meet in the Office of Kipling that exercise of witness in the signing of one of the most unique contracts ever written. Peachy and Danny have risked their lives for Britain, like so many others like them, and have helped to make the country of Queen Victoria the first world power. However, his reward has been poverty and oblivion. Proud, brazen and without a penny ("I have good taste for whisky, for women, jackets and for many other things, but I can not exercise," says Peachy), both have decided that next time they will play the neck for their own benefit. His plan is to cross the Afghanistan, crossing the Hindukush and become Kings of Kafiristán, a region of warrior tribes. "Apparently have 32 Kings," says Danny. "We will be the 33 and 34". "No white man has gone there with life since Alexander", says Kipling. "What Alexander?", asked Peachy. "Alexander the great, King of Greece", answers the journalist. "Because if did it a Greek do us", ends Peachy. As I have already said, the English blood was then valued in carat. It is then when Peachy and Danny sign his contract before Kipling, in which commit themselves to not prove neither alcohol nor women until they have achieved their objectives, and promise to share all the profits fairly. While Kipling creates are two crazy, everything seems to be well planned. The next time that the journalist be found with them you'll be fascinated by the ingenuity of two adventurers, because you will not find two Englishmen but a crazy magician and his assistant. Disguised as that way they will cross the border with a caravan and see in Afghanistan. If in the first half hour of the film have seen especially the portrait of an era and the colonial life concept, while we begin to glimpse closely United that are Danny and Peachy, is from Afghanistan where really strong and peculiar friendship that joins the British descastados look in all its dimensions. Peachy is the wit and the wisdom, while Danny is the charisma and the heart. After surviving the Afghan guerrillas, the two friends they delve in the Hindukush. "The mountains were high and white as wild Rams." They were always fighting. "At night prevent us sleep the thick of his fighting". Danny is temporarily blind by snow and follows the path taken to the tail of a mule. In a surreal moment, the English initiators with two giants. When they discover the secret of the silent guardians, the Earth, both had mistreated them but that in a chance of fate had left them expedited the way, collapses behind them. There is no turning back. On their way through the mountains when in a crucial moment we can understand the idiosyncrasies of the two characters and as their friendship goes beyond the usual. Trapped in the snow and believing already dead, the two friends are reminiscent of old deeds of the army, sing and laugh. For a long time they have lived day by day, and together they have drawn many dangers and dodged many arrows and bullets. You know accept what fate onwards them. At any time there is no reproach, and both expect the end with joy. But the avalanche that cause their laughs will open the road to Kafiristán. Fate plays in his favor through her particular vision of life and death. Arrivals Kafiristán Peachy and Danny will launch his plan: submit to the King of the first village to find and offer you their services and their rifles to create a modern army and overthrow the rest of Kings. To do so they will have with the unexpected help of Billy Fish, a gurka who has served in the British ranks and will be for the two English translator. Fish will be the closest thing to a third friend who can find Danny and Peachy. As they checked very soon, the King has many enemies, which urinate upriver when they bathe (custom deeply rooted among those tribes as they will soon see). Peachy and Danny will soon get rid of the pathetic monarch and occupy the throne of the Kingdom are building. At the village, Danny and Peachy they ask if they are gods. "We are not gods, we are English, which is almost the same." A colonial claim to charged a new dimension later. The plan will continue its course with success, but everything will change when Danny resulting unharmed after receiving a crush, is taken by the son of Alexander the great. King, Danny would be considered a God on Earth. By Peachy Council the English are continuing with the deception. Before departing with the Alexandrian Treasury to the monks of the place custiodado have for centuries, the British must wait to pass the monsoon season. Meanwhile, Peachy builds a bridge over a huge gap and Danny plays his role of divine King. The patilludo soldier turns out to be an excellent legislator and delivers justice "as if he had invented laws", in the words of the own Peachy. Once again, the friendship of the two British shows unwavering. Its objectives, and the role that each plays in this particular Association have clear. At no time Peachy complains or shows discomfort by suddenly be a simple helper. Danny asks him he reverencie also to not arouse suspicion. Being a logical request, Peachy accepted without further discussion. When the formidable plan is about to be fulfilled, a woman crosses on its way. Roxana as the mythical wife of the Macedonian King, is called and Danny will be love with its formidable exotic beauty. Peachy will succeed in removing the idea of approaching her momentarily, but the low passions of Danny will begin to bite in the iron discipline of the man-God. The man who would be King is an ode to a lost era, and as I have said, an exaltation of male friendship. During the film, the role of women is secondary, anecdotal. Out of the friendship between Danny and Peachy feminists are practically a sexual object. When Danny begins to believe his role, the importance of the terms of the contract (in the background, almost the terms of the friendship of the two thugs) will be floated. When in your room the two companions discussed for the first time, rather than a curtain seems to separate them a chasm, as large and deep as that on which have built the bridge. The Pact has been broken. The wrath of God Imra hangs over them. To betray his friendship and violate the contract, indirectly Danny has signed the fate of him and Peachy. Although it aims to start with his share of the treasure, you can not deny a last favor to Danny, and attend his royal wedding to Godfather. It could not be otherwise: as the formidable friends that are the destination of Danny will be linked to the Peachy. Both Michael Caine playing the cunning Peachy as Sean Connery as Danny are formidable in his performances, making a chemistry on screen much more intimate and close to that of Newman and Redford. Two Britons should have shot many more films together, but I guess that the lack of success of the tape did not possible. Although it is difficult to stand out from two giants like these in what were some of his best roles, Christopher Plummer manages to get his small piece of cake as Kipling, fitting in the role with the softness and perfection of a silk glove. Of the actor who plays fish and of which little has become to know say that he endures the harshness of the two adventurers, and who are already is to much. No doubt an endearing character. The beautiful Roxana is played by Caine women back then (and I think that they are currently still together), Shakira Caine. A guy with luck, this Michael. When Huston was almost desperate to find his Roxana, he and other guests saw Shakira at a party and could not but affirm that fate her had put there for them. One of the constants in the career of John Huston has been his intuition to surround himself with good writers and a particular smell and know do almost magical to adapt literary works. His film adaptation of the monstrous Moby Dick is proof of that. In this film Huston helped of a collaborator, Gladys Hill, to write the screenplay. The construction of the story is perfect: we have action, adventure, humor and drama in equal parts. The imprint of a male in the American sense as Huston leave note in the construction of this friendship typically male and brava keeping Danny and Peachy. The work after Huston cameras is equally impeccable, maintaining a pace balanced at all times, letting everything flow naturally, developing the characters at the time that the story follows its course. A work of craftsmanship that has not had the popularity of tapes of subsequent adventures as the archifamosa of Indiana Jones. I will not go to say which is better, for me are all great films of the genre, but yes I think that the man who would be King is a mature romanticism which the archaeologist with whip films lack completely. In a fleeting and strange racing film, the vejete who plays the high priest debuted in cinema at the age of 103 years. Huston discovered you while the grandfather worked as a night watchman in an olive grove. The director offered the role and accepted the good man. In the early days, everything seemed to go well (a Shaman could be interpreted more realistically, it seemed that the priest would have been contemporary of Alexander mismísmo) but the team soon noticed that the Moroccan slept in the shooting. The reason was that the poor man had followed with his vigilante work. Huston made him see that so going to pay him could forget of los olivos forever. Furthermore, let's see some filmed scenes, the elderly considered that thereafter it would be immortal. The man might be a vigilant illiterate of olivares, but certainly failed to comprehend the first that this film. The man who would be King is a film as immortal as the cinema itself, one of the jewels in the Crown of the adventure genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3928

Iñaki Bilbao

Sabotaje

muchocine

Excellent film of Hitchock, the best of the English stage.

"In London are producing a series of sabotage of unknown origin, cause, for the moment, only confusion." However, the police are behind an apparent honest man, who runs a film then.He is married to a good woman and living with her younger brother.A fruit bowl, which has the post near the cinema, is actually an agent of Scotland Yard that follows the steps of her husband, convinced that it is behind the sabotage plot."In effect, this is, and the heads of the plot require you to carry a powerful bomb at the center of the city, which could cause many deaths and real fear to the population."Excellent film of Hitchock, the best of the English stage. Some critics say that it is the best of that stage. I do not dare to say so, but it is a very interesting work that has already been printed the mastery of Hitchcock in recounting a tale of intrigue and suspense.Letting know things that the characters not, delights and makes the viewer experience by moving the springs available with ease and good rhythm. Moments like the brother of the protagonist being in his arms the powerful pump throughout the city, while we watch the hands of various wall clocks wherever he goes, get really may trouble us. For its part, get some great interpretations by Silvia Sidney and Oscar Homolka, as her husband.A film that has not aged and still retains the aroma of good cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1701

Rafa Ferrer

Hitch

muchocine

"Hitch" is one of those movies with a single argument, which opens up a wide range of situations and close them all seamless and in a quite simple way get even get sometimes play with the complicity of the patio of armchairs.

This is one of those strange films begin importing me a cucumber and end up being quite attractive (damn promotion campaigns that end up getting you the film by eyes), the trouble is that you a time seen the trailer and 50 ads that you miss on it (which are the best moments of the film) when you go to the cinema is very difficult to see something that makes you grace, even so some other point started me some that another laugh."Perhaps the best of the movie with Will Smith and Eva Mendes (my God, this girl this tremendous) is the presence of the American comedian Kevin James that manages to boot (Pepe Viyuela style and its already legendary"joeeeeer") best comedy of the film situations.""Hitch" is one of those movies with a single argument, which opens up a wide range of situations and get close them all seamless and quite easily, even get sometimes play with the complicity of the patio of armchairs, that give you additional information that the protagonists have only "very on top". So Parties with some plot "advantage" that makes us a tape where the "good roll" and not always politically correct, is prevailing in the film, even though you leave with that same situation of cinema, once finished the projection.Thank God we are not to the typical romantic comedy starring Meg Ryan, Sandra Bullock, Julia Roberts. or any of the actresses given that kind of movies and although the "moral" or "moralina" final if fits perfectly with this type of frame, the shadow of Will Smith is elongated and his humor "coñón" and "Socarrón" appears during much of the plot (fans Will love, that no, better not see).Finally, synthesizing, that I am extending more than normal, a comedy "sanota" that makes you leave the film of "buenri".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/968

Oscar Cantero

El juego de los idiotas

muchocine

Classical French comedy full of originality that wasted talent.

A few years ago, the dinner of idiots became an unexpected critical and box office success. Its wacky plot, full of unexpected twists and picturesque situations captivated the public. Now, what was its director, Francis Veber, returns with the game the idiots, another comedy full of vitriol, wit and good humor. Pierre Levasseur is a billionaire who one day the gossip reporters photograph down the street with her lover, a famous model. To avoid a costly divorce, not think another thing trying to convince his wife that the explosive blonde of the photo wasn't going with him, but with François Pignon, a passerby who coincidentally passing by and was reflected in the snapshot. To give plausibility to this Assembly, sent to Elena (his concubine) to live in house of Pignon, a modest accommodation of official protection in a humble neighborhood in which the model will live situations discussed and picturesque, to the delight of the Viewer. The cast is very well balanced, although it is missing to the sadly deceased Jacques Villeret, protagonist of the dinner of idiots. GAD Elmaleh, Alice Taglioni and Daniel Auteuil meet perfectly, and Kristin Scott Thomas is superb in his role as wife. The game of idiots is a great movie, with all the virtues of the best French comedy, and demonstrates to make people laugh is not necessary to have a cast full of histriones nor of fantastic situations. Just needed a good script, alertness and players who does not intend to focus all attention on his character. And this film has all of these, go to if it has.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2732

Silvia Giner

La última legión

muchocine

The film has absolutely nothing worthwhile, to go to see it, do not recommend, as well is that do not waste your time or your money.

The film is absolutely predictable, is boring until the absurd and battles are pure garbage. Yes, I admit, the topic of as the great Scalibur reached the rock and as Pendragon had Arthur and everything else is original, it is, but it could have been a great movie that the script is not overly stinky but good movie of popcorn at the end and a niño-actor that puts the same face for everything, everything interprets equalgo shit casting, with good children there.Director Doug Lefler, does not have much shooting in the body, his career focuses on directing a chapter of Xena, Hercules (among others) and that Yes, long Story Board, the kid the Story that has eaten in all the years of profession, notice you.The film has absolutely nothing worthwhile, to go to see it, do not recommend, as well is that do not waste your time or your money.But all this crappy surrounding "The last Legion" (whose trailer is misleading) is due to that the movie has wanted to do quickly and to get out of the way and kill 4 birds with one stone. This film meant an investment in some studies and Hollywood producers seeking to consolidate and launch new products in the film market.And so that you may know that I speak, I come with my section despelleje: what do do in Hollywood when want to launch new talent to the market? Answer: Make a crappy type "The last Legion" where the actores-productos to be launched suck close-up sometimes even absurd and misplaced.And you will wonder is it really profitable the Gringos to do a bad movie only to promote actors?Answer: Obviously yes because each of those actores-producto be one devoted through several peliículas is already filming or signed and that will bring them millions of dollars to the producers who work with them and must also take into account that "The last Legion" won't be a taquillazo but bear the investment has meant, whicheveryone wins. At the end and after all this is a negocio.¿Y who are the actors-product that we are talking about? 1 - Colin FirthQue has given nothing more and nothing less than 7 movies for sale of which 2 of them are foresee as taquillazos, what end conviertiendolo definitely in a new Clive Owen, with what will be the end disassociate from the genus televisimo to which he has devoted most of his atística career. It is the largest investment of this film.2 - Aishwarya RaiUna women's most spectacularly beautiful of all time. Of the few comparable with the great divas of the classic film. Imported from Bollywood where is a consecrated star, his leap and consolidation in Hollywood her become a new Angelina Jolie. It is also an excellent actress of action which will mean that it unseat the pusilámines to win roles of heroin and super women. Aishwarya is full of talent and is a polished diamond ready for display. Its participation in upcoming productions will be rewarded with millions of dollars. You have 2 pending release, including American films "the Panther pink 2".3 - Rupert FriendDestinado to become the new Orlando Bloom (that is you has posted fame to the head and walk asking a priceless cache). This young man who has become confused on many occasions with Orlando it is also noviete of Keira Knightley and the paparazzi as conundía with Orly. The first levels that get you in "The Legion últims" come on, look good, are estudiadísimos to make the most of its beauty as their destination will be the sexual icon of all adolescents in the next 5 years. His career is composed of 6 films made between 204 and 2007 and has for sale other 6 all made in 2007 and 2008 (just after "the last Legion", what a coincidence).You do not quejaréis of the doctoral thesis in despelleje that I have made in this critique in addition if you are sensible I shall give the reason.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3656

Tito Chinchan

Death Proof

muchocine

Infumable truño about a guy who becomes obsessed with women and them want to kill on Board of your car. Much talk, little action and dialogues that surely many people they encandilen, but they helped me to decide what made the next day for dinner.

Director: Quentin Tarantino. duration: hour and a half of talk, 19 moved minutes and 1 minute of show.Release date: August 29, 2007Espectadores: 185.083 beings human according to the Ministry of culture, so you go to know do know by that women do not want is to marry? That to 100 grams each of chorizo are not the whole pig. Embedded within this joke of low estofa is an ancient philosophy that goes on to say "If the duck quacks on the fig tree, the mouse roerá the bowels of the Earth with the sharp fangs of an armadillo died in acts of extreme bravery". Or put another way, go truño movie I've swallowed with a little that seemed that improved but it lasts less than a powder with the Pataki (I would go with haste to tell, of course, is that you do not hesitate my manhood, muahahahaha).The film is about a type who calls specialist Mike or Joe or something like that, which has a black car that makes brrrummmm, bruuummm and with a duckling in the nose. Then leave babes chatting about what out them of her pussy, and are called black shit, bitch white and similar, but they are amiguitas. And it has ass as arenas. And then these crap and skinny white whores black disappear and leave others call including whores, black and white shit but you want to. And suddenly, when it seems that begins the film, goes and finishes.I have to make the synopsis of the film make a tribute to the beginning of every child in school, that when asked a summary tells the whole movie and unconnected horns. If this movie is a tribute to something, is that anything goes. Let's see, that big pain in the ass. I'm equal to be homage, the Tarantino is God for some or what you want to see two women's groups say you basteces that they sonrojarían to plumbers seasoned with raja in the ass in the air, it seems to me interesting. And not pass anything throughout the film rather than see these women say nonsense seems a roll. Only okay, towards the middle of the movie, a scene. I think that they put it to awaken to the staff.In short, infumable truño about a guy who becomes obsessed with women and them want to kill on Board of your car. Much talk, little action and dialogues that surely many people they encandilen, but they helped me to decide what made the next day for dinner. Mental straw.Besitos.P.D: We should have recorded the face that we stayed my half Zucchini and me when suddenly there is an "End". Incredible.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1583

Caruco

La ciencia del sueño

muchocine

Four steps are perhaps the distance that separates us from the happiness dreamed the real, of our inner world outside, the genius to autism and the incompresión.

This is the type of movies that make me happy. So they have staff, and so they can get to surprise me. The tandem of Michel Gondry with the revered screenwriter Charlie Kaufman had given a product so special as "Forget me". But the French has now taken a necessary step, the spared Kaufman (hope that not defintivamente), to dive within their own universe.Perform a work, only faced with danger, with all its strengths and weaknesses, in which give rein to his status of artist, sole author, without the shadow of Kaufman, and to see that was capable.And behold, Gondry staged representation of two worlds, almost parallel. Not at all because they often intersect or touch. On occasions to learn how to coexist, in others to follow doomed to be separated. One is at the level of physical, imperfect but recognizable and easy to share; the other is more abstract, intangible, perfect but only in the imagination of oneself. Reality and fantasy.So far, so close.In the case of "The science of sleep", both worlds could join only giving four steps, exactly which are a door to another between neighbours in the same landing.Perhaps the distance that separates us from the happiness dreamed the real, of our inner world outside, the genius to autism and the incompresión. But there are four tour steps that can also be insurmountable. One of the dangers of detain too in our wonderful and utopian fantasies.It would be formidable to have the elegance and socanerría of a Cary Grant or Sean Connery. Or resemble the rebel without a cause born to live quickly and intensely, and die young but free, as the Laszlo Kovaks of Jean Paul Belmondo in "at the end of the escape"; become the cynical and hard, and sensitive, Philip Marlowe who played Humphrey Bogart in, for example, "the big sleep"; the honest, endearing and popular Ransom Stoddard of the James Stewart of "The man who shot Liberty Vallance"; even in el salvador Neo Keanu Reeves in "Matrix".Marijuana Gondry.Pero not. Then comes an individual of the ilk of Stéphane (a splendid Gael García Bernal), who invented his world; "does a fictional television show, horses of cardboard, impossible time machines, cotton clouds and buildings constructed with the? stop motion" of the more traditional animation. And a guy with a fair dose of stupidity, creativity and romanticism, which appears, settled there, either in Paris or in the big or small screen, and steals the heart, at the time that feeds our illusion.A Stéphane confronted with the reality of a grey work and the lot which must be swift, with a co-worker in a State of permanent zeal that revitalises your hormones, Guy (Alain Chabet); and with a neighbor, Stéphanie (Charlotte Gainsbourg), which could be the link to the "normal" world. With it, there so much win!, or both that lose!.I saw "The science of sleep" will be already more than four months in the last film festival in Sitges. Among the spectators who swarmed the aged film El Retiro, and an audience, perhaps too delivered, not stopped laughing and celebrate this invention by Gondry. Then, it was not a particular fan of his work. But in one of those rare and magical times, I also felt in communion with all of them.As Kaufman, or that crazy point to the Spike Jonze, will I need more doses of Gondry.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1895

Iñaki Bilbao

Sunshine

muchocine

It is not bad, but nor however, you interested, but it results in excessive artificial, contains very positive elements such as the value of self-sacrifice for others, but it is clearly inadequate, and its technical package is enviable, but the plot suffers from roundness, clarity and true emotion.

Interesting film of science fiction? more on paper than in the celluloid.This "achievement", certainly must preparations are you to director Danny Boyle, who, with lighting, sound, and special effects achieved a zacchia film, where the trees can't see the forest (if it actually exists, that is another).The idea is good, contains, no doubt a plausible story from several points of view. As genuine science fiction and tape as a work of undoubted humanist nature. What prevails over any consideration, however, is the visual impact.This is achieved, perhaps, but just for letting in the viewer a sense of latent dissatisfaction, which makes think that it has missed a good opportunity to achieve something important really. The Union of several topics that have already played in the film, as of the kind of natural disasters, as well as those who scavenge the dangers come space through beings already earthlings already from other worlds, becomes so lead us to other times seen in other works, much more achieved, that this time everything happens with quite some noise but shallow.The script, including dialogue, escarba not enough on the themes addressed, resulting in the end an amalgam of ideas, but not annoying and interested in some specific moments (repair of the shield), not just conveniently curdling.The appearance, for example, of the fifth passenger of the ship, is less colorful and important what it required, still shooting all the sequences in which comes with a nerviosísimo "dance of St. Vitus", fashionable in the current film, which we tide and epata, but does not have much to say. "Sunshine" is not bad, but not well, has interest, but results in excessive artificial, contains very positive elements, such as the value of self-sacrifice for others, but is clearly insufficient, and its technical package is enviable, but the plot suffers from roundness, clarity and true emotion. A movie that glimpse of his potential, but not covered in any way. The epilogue, very nice.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/301

Tito Chinchan

A todo gas 3: Tokyo race

muchocine

It adds something new? No. does something to make worthy of going to see it? Lol

I think that the first film of this genre was Karate Kid. Yes, but true. At that, a chavalín reaches a place unknown to him and falls in love with the wrong girl. It swivels the lomo chulito of the place, but our Kid perseveres in the effort until a fair match gives a beating (as well as a lesson about life). Because these cars are the same, with the exception that the protagonist no longer a timorous character, if not the more cool in his neighborhood.The film is a minor (of hairs in shave to knife and eggs which no longer meet the 30) who is arrested for the umpteenth time in United States by making illegal races. His mother, to avoid the thing happens to older sends to Tokyo with her father, marine profession. There he meets girl who likes, coincidentally is the sister of a mobster who wins in a race but he perseveres until the final tontada in which all are is your place. Another one of the genre.Buff, what you want I say a film whose Rodeo translation would be To PETA and rabid, stalling in Tokyo? For that, a film of car that skid, which tunean and which is laugh at the authority. It adds something new? No. does something to make worthy of going to see it? No, with the exception of the scenes of driving to the limit (as you see drifting 100 the following become cansinas). So little more I can say, that comes out Vin Diesel the last two minutes to leave the faithful with honey on the lips.In short, a hodgepodge of racing and tuned cars that are stalling on the streets of Tokyo. Many special effects, but engages the script nor interest in history. In addition, you know who gets the girl and who is humiliated in the final race.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2586

José A. Peig

Indiana Jones En busca del arca perdida

muchocine

That same ease and freshness in the treatment of the characters and situations is pervasive throughout all the footage, so smooth and strong narrative that one reaches the end credits with a thought: just seen the total adventure, paradigm of the seventh art as a recreational tool.

According to an original idea by George Lucas, Steven Spielberg signed here one of his films more round, paradigm of the modern adventure film and presentation of Indiana Jones, the model of adventurous hero that has most influenced the minds of fans over the past decades.The intention was to recover a classic style taking as a reference the film and comic of the years 30 and 40. The result was indeed a return to adventure movies, Furthermore, managed to reformulate the style and the myth of the hero in tune with the new demands of the emerging culture of masses, and a film industry ready to exploit the new possibilities. First and foremost, "Raiders of the Lost Ark" is the expression more forceful that has ever had the film in its more profitable field: the show devoid of any other intention than that of entertain the viewer with a succession of passages filmed in such a way that they excite and cause amazement, not only by a visual delight which is of impeccable handling of the tempos and the pace immediate consequencealso by the perfect structure to be linking a few situations with others, in a cluster of action scenes that become pure film to be at the service of a simple narrative and seamless. In this way, the film not demanded anything the Viewer, we are talking about a product consumption easy, but done with art.First bars: a group of travelers in a jungle, a mysterious character with jacket and hat leads the retinue, always behind or above the camera, we will not see his face until moments later, when one of the companions intended to betray him, then hear the hum of a whip and from the jungle shadows emerges the face of the unsung hero. The presentation of Indiana reinforces the subtle and mysterious halo that is (should be) own all charismatic hero. The subsequent sequence before the idol of gold, the approximation to the objective attitude of barely disguised reverence, stunned and fascinated expression in the gesture of Harrison Ford before take the relic, in a few short moments Spielberg characterized the character and makes a simple but powerful drawing which will be protagonist and winner in the great quest. He is passionate about the campy archaeologist who transmutes his appearance of erratic traveller in a respectable University teacher dressed in a suit, "gafotas" and object of desire by some of his students. Reflection of the hero, once hanging the whip, jacket and hat, appears to be one of the lot.Already said elsewhere: the narration is an art of synthesis, and above all, "in search of the Lost Ark" is a story in which all the characters (despite being quite one-dimensional) are characterized with effective stroke, without unnecessary details that could impede the pace of storytelling. Spielberg - along with the commendable work of that great screenwriter named Lawrence Kasdan - summarizes the action of the show with a succession of acts perpetrated by consistent characters and in the service of such action. From Belock, antithesis of the hero, to Marion, passing through Shallá (gesture unforgettable his farewell from the docks before heading on the boat of Katanga) or repulsive secret agent who deceives us with a hanger coat which home looked like a flogging instrument. Everybody's looking for the Ark for a few reasons stated with clarity.Simplicity and conciseness, this is the key to the good cine-espectáculo. Add is a configuration of profiles attractive and claw.Some critics have wanted to see flaws in this film, and often refer to the inability of Spielberg to create complex characters. Indeed, the characters are fairly one-dimensional, but in this particular area is not necessary to have characters with complexity (depending on the intentions and contents of each movie, that would be analyzed). And - conclude these clueless critics - the movie would have been much better if the characters have other shades apart from the archetype "the movie boy", "girl from the movie", "the bad friend of the bad guys", "good friend", etc.Well, all this is nonsense according to the scope and the intent of the product. Synthesis. Synthesis. Synthesis, damn is. That is to say, in this case, which, supposedly, the film could win with the (unnecessary) effort by director and screenwriter to create more complex characters, would lose it the pace, pulse and narrative momentum, continuity of action without respite and dialogue serving essentials. That is, the very essence of the film would be lost. This being one of the few times in which claims are couples with the final result, sobran all considerations that are being demanded product something that does not form part of its scope. What matters here is to provide the history of a characterology of characters akin to the structure of media and content, not depth. Moreover, it is a film that moves by land arquetipales, prone to the topic and the sentimentality, but never falls into such defects. Perfect example of this is the scene of Marion and Indiana in the boat, the kiss between the wounds of an Indiana battered and grumpy, a time to love, but without falling into the as usual sentimentality in scenes of this type.That same ease and freshness in the treatment of the characters and situations is pervasive throughout all the footage, so smooth and strong narrative that one reaches the end credits with a thought: just seen the total adventure, paradigm of the seventh art as a recreational tool.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2723

Ramón Besonias

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Effective film of persecution rather than well orchestrated for enjoyment of every lover of the genre.

Postmodern cinema we were accustomed to giving up the possibility even suggest the absurd idea that every hero has, like the rest of mortals, a past life and? less - that that life influence decisively in its future actions (save the world from bad very bad, knowing men and dazzling, traveling to exotic places with all expenses paid)(, and one handful of benefits that have that be postmodern hero).The case of the saga Bond exemplified with justice. Never mind the past life of James (name cliché of the elegant, cultured type and with resources that crazy woman is crossing). What interests the Viewer is see how Bond, James Bond, and again displays their stereotypes effectively, and without disheveled, tainting the suit or aging. Because? that is the truism - the postmodern hero never dies or is subject to natural laws that we unfortunately endure mortals of a foot. If it were not so it would lose its fascination.Those Greeks who listened to their elders the Homeric deeds of Ulysses, Hector, Achilles and the entire family of Greek heroes of insurance were also fascinated by the strength, perseverance and perfection of these demigods. If any of us had even tried to emulate one of their smallest deeds, not would have left well stopped them at the first start. The postmodern hero is a hero because it concentrated all those qualities that mortals would like to possess. But the Greek hero was not hero just for being different (or better) than mortals; his heroism was only proven and immortalized if he assumed his destiny, a destiny which in most cases ended in death. Even the Christian hero par excellence just after the Greek model of hero and just crucified. The life of the classic hero is not therefore a bed of roses. You must first reflect on himself, finding inside the necessary knowledge about its nature, and so act accordingly. The Greek heroes are some patterns, but are also honest and intelligent. And without this attribute would not be a mere Rambo.El current film begins to opt for more traditional models of hero, in which occurs a process of internal search to become what later will demonstrate that they have never ceased to be. The hero is forged, does not arise on our screens from scratch, as suggested by the postmodern film. See if no cases like the Nolan Batman, Bond Campbell or this Bourne that closes the trilogy of the absent-minded hero slowly regaining its past (i.e., their identity, their humanity). Do even Spiderman Raini? a hero naif of advertisement - explores in his memory to mend his hero role.Bourne, unlike Bond, is a less focused hero to do its work of secret agent with a license to kill, and more inclined to know how and why became who is. Bourne needs to know it. But Bond is and will always be Bond. And nobody seemed to mind him from where comes this gentleman until Campbell came up digging in his past, offering us a job deconstructive on the old postmodern hero who begins to need a facelift image.Bourne, like the Nolan Batman, builds his heroism on the basis of the acceptance of his tragedy or their fears. They are both heroes that have a shadow that haunts them and which in turn makes them react and do what they do, beyond the rest of mortals, delivered to an eternal present without remission. Now, Bourne closes with this third installment its ability to exist as a hero, that after knowing and renege on their status of killer, you no longer need more trips in search of its identity. The classic hero must always die.Not without narrative intentions one of the promotional posters located in Bourne on his back, offering the viewer a clear metaphor for the memory of the hero.Out of this short reflection on the nature of the hero, it must be said that the Bourne Ultimatum is an effective film of persecution rather than well orchestrated for enjoyment of every lover of the genre. They are those persecutions which make more tragables the scenes in which an anything emotional (as always) Damon seeks answers to a question that viewers already have resolved or would ignore with great pleasure. And is the third installment of the raids of this killer for the greater glory of the State that does not want to be more than he himself only gave for this: a good action movie, with a mise en scène that keeps us attached to the seat. What else can request? why the two murderers who persecute Bourne are Arabs? Why not be let see a bit more of Madrid? Why Damon only performs decently when you child that seems good but not?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1058

Silvia

Azuloscurocasinegro

muchocine

The drama, the story behind an aura of optimism because, as reads the poster for the film: If you don't like the color of your life can be able to change it.

Blue are the costumes you saw George when he has to deal with a job interview. But he prefers the black suit which is always seen in a showcase everytime it goes through a store in your neighborhood. But what is relevant is not the suit itself if not representing because Azuloscurocasinegro is a story full of metaphors. Like with the costumes, Jorge aspires to work better than the goalkeeper.This is a metaphor for the struggle to improve in a more competitive society in which it is difficult to make progress.The dark blue (almost black) also which follows the lives of young people who appear in the story, some boys in the difficult process of building or rebuilding their own identity, both personal and professional. The situation is more worrying especially for George, who is forced to face the inability of moving from his father after a heart attack, while cares of their studies; too much responsibility for a young man who has just begun his career. However, Jorge shows the strength of moving forward without paying to see it all black.It is the story of personal battle for survival in a hostile and competitive world that creates frustrated individuals. The character of George represents the fight against the fate of each one, the desire to overcome and the desire to live a life that no one choose for him. George is not as working goalkeeper, legacy his father's trade, if not that he wants a "better" job, which is supposed provide "better" conditions of life. Fight with all your strength to get it because you don't want to live a life that has not elected. But the interesting thing is not will if you get it or not, if not the development of the film at the same time entailed the vital development of the protagonist. Personal growth which will accompany a brother spend their days in jail and a friend obsessed with spying on his neighbors through their binoculars. Paula, the bride's brother George, who was also in prison, will change without wanting to the life of the two brothers. As the story unfolds, the lives of all of them are weaving into a same struggle for the freedom of each one to choose their vital way.But although it's a theme of neighbourhood, that does not preclude that the Mise en scène and the Assembly are original and deeply care to detail. The lives of George and the presidiaria Paula are literally melting on the screen, using Visual and sound resources. But these stylistic resources aren't contrived, quite the contrary, the film follows an aura of truth, realism, so that anyone can be identified directly or indirectly with what happens to the protagonists. In addition to the success in the well cared aesthetics, what more the film captive is the emotional state in which immerses us. A sad mixture of tenderness and humor that leaves no cold nor to the indifferent. The deep drama qualifies with moments of humorous dye as the final scene between the son and the father at the door of the masseuse, probably with the intention to demystify the misfortunes and ease the suffering of the characters.Because the protagonists of this story hidden aspects of his life and they are deceiving themselves, hence the sweet and sour aftertaste that stays in the palate of the spectator once ends the film. However the drama, the story behind an aura of optimism because, as reads the poster for the film: If you don't like the color of your life can be able to change it. Because life is not black and white or of a single color, it is kaleidoscopic, full of nuances and the only way to survive is to try to see it from all angles, to be able to see the color that best defines us.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3924

José A. Peig

Halloween El Origen

muchocine

It was not necessary, but the humanization of M. Myers has given a decent result. A simple, somewhat confusing in its internal structures, product but faithful and strong with regard to its fundamental premises and explored mythology.

Carpenter created a mystique of the Slasher writing the tale of terror from the enigmatic gaze of the murderer. In the 1978 film, as we already said, central character and mise en scene are a whole that articulates the elements at stake: Psychology (ambiguous), (cyclic) time, space (geometry of terror Haddonfeld) and action. M. Myers contained what polyhedral it encloses the unknown and unfathomable.Basically, the re-reading of Rob Zombie brings humanization and/or explanation of that enigma with a sense of the risk - so - quite limited (although also honest, viewed from another angle). Implicit misogyny of Myers - the original - here is an explanation in some family roots characterized by the presence of women indifferent to the needs of Michael and the abuse of a parent borrachuzo and cruel, in a dismal socio-economic environment. Resorting to stereotypes simplifies the product. Father borrachuzo, mother of life promiscuous. how many times we have been told the same story?. The stereotype can (but not always) work when its use conforms to laws related to the mythology of the subgenre. Michael Myers is a myth and an archetype that almost reaches the category of film canon. Thus, in response to his attributes, say that characterology used to outline the social environment of Michael Myers fits well with the purpose to develop. This explains that - despite observed simplification in a product that apparently wants to offer the description of a psychological process detailed, nothing less than the genesis of a psychopath - end being a solid product when we look at it from the perspective of its creator; play with the profile and Myers attributes to find the humanity of the myth inspired by the clichés of the genre. Obviously need an intellectual work that exceeds the topics to expose the genesis of a psychopath, so that it has a narrative and artistic validity. But - and I refer to the above - let us not deceive ourselves. Rob Zombie is not intended to articulate an intellectual discourse, and his film isn't so cheat as it might seem in principle.The film kicks off unceremoniously. Photography illuminates and exemplifies the sordidness of the story. The Mise en scène - although it is light of the psychological, temporal and spatial depth that we see in the film by Carpenter - years is an adjusted instrument to express enough without falling into excesses free. Much hemoglobin, but all violent sequences are resolved with sobriety and elegance, there is no such excess of artifice that we often see in many horror and action films and do not produce anything other than a free deformation to compensate for the lack of visual imagination. Many of these sequences, it must also be said, they sound as views, situations resolved with total lack of inspiration, and the unnecessary use of enclosed levels. This, we repeat, simplifies the product, but - we again insist - from another layer of the film, it becomes an unavoidable trait, a reverential language to the common places that define the myth.The characterization of the infant is another remarkable point. The androgyny of Myers, its seráfica beauty, makes a hypersensitive profile to the universe of sexual acts that surrounds it, in accordance with the violence deployed in the second part of the film against girls that make sex a cause for mockery or sway over the opposite sex or innocence (weakness) of Laurie Strode. In this sense, not in vain the construction of the female characters (specifically, the friends of Laurie) pointing to the banality in the gestures and attitudes. Let's say that Zombie wants the Viewer to feel empathy towards humanity from Myers. The murderer defends the innocent and kills the Harassers, and all this finds a reference in the description of his childhood. However, although he alludes to Myers sensitivity towards the innocent, the profound reason which induces the prostration and the unmasking of Myers before her sister does not have a one-dimensional expression, and that is where the humanity of the character reaches a certain expression polyhedral, closest to the construct devised by Carpenter, the dimension of the real, so suggestive and enigmatic as the human phenomenon: Michael kneels before her sister, shows the picture and its true face. The silence of Myers was never so significant. Only Laurie survival instinct leads to the tragic outcome. The romanticism of the victim is that ultimately prevails in the discourse about the genesis of the myth. You have failed, says Dr. Loomis, who here defines Myers as an Antichrist originated by the confluence of internal and external factors more - and better - character integrated into the story that Dr. Loomis of Carpenter. The evil of Myers is not exclusively ontological, is a child of the circumstances. (Attentive viewers will appreciate, by the way, some parallels between the speech used by Zombie to explain to Myers and used by George Lucas in Revenge of the Sith to explain Darth Vader.)It was not necessary, but the humanization of M. Myers has given a decent result. A simple, somewhat confusing in its internal structures, product but faithful and strong with regard to its fundamental premises and explored mythology.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2786

Jose Contreras

El Club de los Suicidas

muchocine

"The club of suicide" part of a good story, so lovers of Tejero will have double the pleasure of seeing you do Uncle enrollao and suffer with its history.

The press speaks and speaks of Spanish cinema with the hope of playing any chord at the expense of my compassion for the poor figures or my patriotism. I've always ignored why the Spanish adjective added to a title of a film has to cause me some emotion that will not boot, of Yes, the show I'm consuming. And to question my patriotism, which is quite doubtful, I have to say that I was disturbed both the decline of the Spanish film and the resurgence of the Nepali poetry. To me give me good titles, like this of "club of suicide", and me not bother much with the flags.A good part of the films that want to saddle me with the excuse of the patriotic adjective not amount of the classification of sainetes. Producers are not put to work when they have a good history, are put to work when they have a couple of friendly names whose tics have conquered the public. Aware of this, many actors learn to sustain entire functions at the expense of his own comic vis. The Actor's Studio in Madrid is a histriones factory. The viewer will see films of Fernando Tejero because you like, and no need to know the name of the directors. "Even less of the writers.""The club of suicide" part of a good story, so lovers of Tejero will have double the pleasure of seeing you do Uncle enrollao and suffer with its history. Lucía Jiménez helps less, not because it does well the role of suicide ciclotímica that it is, but because it is not able to do anything else.The film rediscovers the best of our cinema of the 1950s, Jardiel Poncela, Edgar Neville, with a story of the absurd full of tenderness. A therapy group decides to put an end to their problems with a Covenant. They will meet every Tuesday to decide who will have the pleasure of dying and who is going to be the executor in a card game, following the example of the novel of r. l. Stevenson.El fine humor comes from the irony of the approach, the paradox of situations, because it is fortunate if they just evil and a frustration if they survive. But the main inspiration is the contrast of the characters. Gordito, perhaps the most successful, is a fudge to kill, and that makes it endearing. There is a memorable scene in which Fernando Tejero wants to support him and goes to his burger bar with ambulance work. Each character in the scene is understanding a different story, to which more crazy, the spectator, who understands them all, don't know where mess. It is a sequence worthy to be included in the short list of examples of high comedy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3010

Kiko de España

Salir Pitando

muchocine

Seeing as it is the national scene today, you laugh at least awhile and you forget the photography, which is a little vulgar. I liked it.

With Álvaro Fernández Armero me pasa lo mismo which with Hot hot heat by squishy to be the movie to present (the game of truth, for example) something will be that I will end up doing grace, and that is because everything is a lie (the own gunsmith told me a year ago that the dvd Edition is fucking because her has a very foreign producer untraceable.)Against all odds I happened it very well with her last movie, leaving whistling for his characters and their dialogues / discussions. On this occasion Toledo-Gutiérrez chemistry not weakens in no time and is comedy in its purest form in the journey to the airport.The Poza little leaves and strain, is not the cinema days and Antonio de la Torre is immense.In this comedy about less is football (as in The Host the bug) and more is that of losing fear and such, especially in love.Seeing as it is the national scene today, you laugh at least awhile and you forget the photography, which is a little vulgar. But I liked (the movie).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1742

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El buen alemán

muchocine

Failed attempt to bring a form of film-making classic, from the use of lenses from time to entenebrecer a black and white too strange and little real to this modern firing genius Vertigo.

This deception that is definitively to the black and white and taxed a tribute apparently goer to the immortal Casablanca is in the background, a failed attempt of greening the vintage of the time spirit, their hazy textures, the Warner Brothers logo descromatizado and the air between the nostalgic and the philanthropic (love of the cinema, you can understand) de la obra de Soderbergh.Lo that comes later is a heavy history of espionagein which there is no good nor bad but characters housed in a strange time of moral buildings reventadas by the war and a commitment to multinational by rebuilding devastated the barbarism that they themselves forged.The survival, the boarder of the sentiments, the hard-fought battle of the newly invented cold war generated a thick and little affordable script for the Viewer, ending slightly interested (how not) but unfortunately troubled by the grief of this political traces to guignol attends the patterns of the genre (romance, the lies, the elaborate dialogues) and accelerates them to the runrún of these times now so the impression is frankly sadder. Exits one as depressed the film, without having heard nothing concrete. In any case, to a pragmatic evidence of the instinct of man by accommodate the inconveniences of his own madness. Rate weary and burdened by an inappropriate cluster in occasions of small little relevant side plots, the film cares much more form than substance. Usually standard of this director and he has not yet made film where is the argument which lead images and not to the upside down.Resource insert documentary scenes in the plot makes a little more bearable as well as the acting effort of a committed casting it but George Clooney is overly broad in its role, it does what should not (and can avoid it as we assume knows), that is, overact, confer on its role as evidence of drama, of falsehood. Not happens you to CAte Blanchett, every day more classic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3803

Rafa Ferrer

El precio de la verdad

muchocine

If you like the world of journalism and want to see something (based on a true story), it is worth keep an eye.

To which we are dedicated to a greater or lesser extent to this "write" this film, virtually unknown tells one of the things that we often face, you feel to the keyboard to write something (collaborated on a film page, another of monologues and a couple where I send some other news loose) and sometimes you like to "disguise the reality" to give another approachHow many times one has stopped before the keyboard thinking, perhaps, that the news was writing should not have happened so, that it had to have happened differently and that, unfortunately, you can not do anything to change it. !So is life! Every month as I have to submit different articles for the sites where work I think so what would happen if he completely changed the article I am writing? What would happen without rather than rely on accurate and concise information do so inventing me? This is what makes the protagonist of this film, played by Hayden Christensen "Anakin", in this film and we see how the thing goes from being a brilliant editor to be a pringao. It has seemed curious to see in the film criteria that are a priori not always respected when it comes to make a magazine in the light, not always checks if the information is true, the articles presented are not always read, and NI DE COÑA director defends death to drafters, rather click them to get of them 200% of what they publish. Bad times in this era of information. I know that it would have to give my opinion on the film and yet here I am releasing of what little I know of this scene, where is squeezed much staff and where few (if not none) are given opportunity to people who know, leaving than if do you the dropping of duty or the "sons of the." Once I I desquitado pleasure, I'll see if I can speak a little of the film, brilliantly shot and so pleasant, that the hour and 28 minutes of footage spent flying, perhaps as this negative note the drudgery of the soundtrack that accompanies almost the best moments and scenes of the same. The performances by the actors are excellent and the direction seems sober and at the same time effective, with a perfect picture. Anyway, if you like the world of journalism and want to see something (based on a true story), it is worthwhile to take a look. For me, without a doubt one of the biggest surprises of the year.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/944

Silvia

Borat

muchocine

I do not know until that point is worth spending the money of a film entry to see such canallada. Borat: Do the new stream of Kazakhstan?

Perhaps I expected a more damning criticism of the traditional American system. Perhaps he hoped laugh more with this surreal story that is sold as a politically incorrect comedy but is not much more that a succession of escatological gags that fall in the absolute ridiculous and evil like (even to remember me Jackass at times).For which do not yet know, Borat Sagdiyev is a fictional British television character played by Sacha Baron Cohen. Borat is considered the second most famous journalist of Kazakhstan which sent to the U.S. to learn about their culture and its political system. Thus starts the surrealist movie, whose ultimate goal seems to be criticized more traditional values and deep Americans. A more peculiar type whose hobbies are based on ping-pong, wrestling, dance music disc and shooting dogs.Borat is a controversial character, especially because it constantly expresses his anti-Semitism, his blatant misogyny (women are only for him meras prostitutes his intolerance and lack of respect for any kind of collective (dares to get even with the diminished).) However, Sacha Baron Cohen is Jewish. That is why Cohen defenders say that the attitude of Borat is not racist but that embodies a parody on anti-Semitism in American society. What isn't so clear is if majority public that will go to cinemas to see the movie, teenagers, will take it as a parody or if history will help to reinforce stereotypes and prejudices that may have with regard to the countries of Eastern Europe.Personally, what I liked most was not so much humor escatólogico nor the antics, but the fact that Sacha Baron Cohen, with his character, exposes the hypocrisy that it breathes in American society and serves as a vehicle for reflection on what we consider as a civilized society. The scene in which Borat is in the midst of deifying holding a meeting of Catholic fans is for shudder is if we stop to think that they are the same individuals who vote to Bush in the presidential election and that exasperated against Islamic fanaticism. The irreverent interviews system adopted by the atypical reporter manages to bring out the lowest misery of Americans.The last joke lies in the contradiction that the film is sweeping at the North American box office, precisely the place that history turns his criticism. The truth is that the character can not leave anyone indifferent, but I do not know until that point is worth spending the money of a film entry to see such canallada.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2274

Rafa Delgado

Hostel 2

muchocine

One absolute, regrettable and very bad taste waste of time... and money.

Last year was released worldwide the new project of Eli Roth, Hostel. With a budget of $ 4,500,000, the movie of Roth promoted along with the name of Quentin Tarantino (excellent business strategy) ended up grossing approximately $80.000.000 worldwide (the bait sold), still a considerable success for the director of Cabin Fever.Aquella, but passable by hairs, was nothing out of this world: its - aburridísima - first half full of tits and good women see, it was a kind of American Pie videoclipzada, more disruptive and set in the Eroupa of the East, which gave way to a funny (but not for everyone) feast on the half hour of duration of more or less explicit violence and, depending on how you look, a peculiar sense of humor.As the formula worked, and as often happens in United States, the sequel was more than assured.Because her already have here: named as Hostel, part 2, and that turns out to be for me, for now, the pior movie of the year.In Hostel, part 2 it perceives an Eli Roth desganado with a film that not fancy you. Everything is very neglected: the plot continues where left it its predecessor, making an aplaudible effort to not follow the plot clichés of the consequences of this kind of films, introducing the characters of Roger Bart and Richard Burgi to slightly boost the plot and the set end being a commercial copyasteo of the first part. In all this, it fails. Just falling into the same clichés of always, (all) characters do not stop working (badly described), and the film ends up being, as expected, a copypasteo from its predecessor. but more boring, more light and without a shred of sense of black humor breathed in Hostel, part 1 (is now there to call it?).One absolute, regrettable and very bad taste waste of time. and money.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4263

Txapulin

Monstruoso

muchocine

A movie that perfectly meets the expectations created by the best campaign of marketing in recent years. Millimetric calculated to make us have a good time.

You are going to submit a tape which her we found at the site that was once Central Park. This is the shocking approach (although not so original, remember that the Blair Witch Project) from the film with the best promotional campaign of the past years. The result perfectly meets expectations. It offers exactly what the trailer promises: a giant monster destroys New York, while all simulates to be shot with a homemade camera and without mounting, with the result that would be if it were recorded in several shots in a single night.The result is completely calculated to be realistic and credible, and at the same time is able to maintain the tension and that the Viewer is not lost, telling us the history which is the case, with several plot surprises excellently stowed in the plot, including a secondary narration perfectly embedded in the Assembly and that offers a dimension added to the story and an excellent epilogue.I dare not say that the film is revolutionary, because I don't think he believed school (although there are [REC] Balagueró i Diary of the Dead of Romero to take me the opposite), but yes excellently leverages the latest advances in digital cinema to offer something never seen until now, at least not in this way. We also have a product that already input is more than a film. Thanks to the different viral websites that have emerged on the movie, we know where it comes the monster and other elements involved in the story (the oil company, the Japanese drink, the Group antisitema, etc.), things that the same format of the film can not be explained within the context of the same. Total, a very enjoyable film, that makes fit perfectly the commercialism with original, and approach accompanied by an interesting phenomenon of viral internet marketing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4308

Cecil B. Demente

Mad monster party?

muchocine

Musical comedy with puppets animated by stop motion and a delicious dish for all good lover of the genre.

Baron Frankenstein, head of the world Organization of monsters and scientist crazy, just invent a formula capable of destroying matter, so it decided to mount a party so that all their relatives know the good news. Quickly sends his messengers bats to Dracula, the Wolf Man, the Mummy, the Hunchback of Notre Dame, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the creature from the Black Lagoon, the Invisible Man and Felix Flanken, his young nephew pharmaceutical (the thing not invited because it has a reputation for spoilers it).During the event, the doctor makes a demonstration of the destructive capabilities of its new potion and informed his guests that he has decided to retire now that he's at the peak of his career. His successor will inherit the position and all its secrets, so there is no one who does not want the post. Tejerán conspiracies, planearán murders, create alliances and betrayals as if it were a Shakespearean play, and is soon rolling of Saint-Quentin. But, what are King Kong on all this?Musical comedy with puppets animated by stop motion and a delicious dish for all good lover of the genre: Jules Bass made of head chef, Harvey Kurtzman (Publisher of EC Comics and Mad magazine creator) is responsible for the script and Jack Davis from character design, while Peter Lorre and Boris Karloff, Phyllis Diller provided voices and features the characters. Have they begun to babear already?If they now give us the coñazo with the great magical epics, the 1960s was fashionable in the monstrous. A monstrous child and quite low in calories, that Yes, that in the previous decade had imposed the fucking Comics Code, and everyone was with the fly after the ear for stopping censorship (do won't be the Mr Fotolog relative of Fredic Wertham, evil bug author of the book The Seduction of the Innocent?). The own Kurtzman was one of the hardest to clad his line of horror comics ("Stories from the crypt" and company), and those had happened straws really if it weren't for him remained in the limelight magazine Mad. Humor in this film not far from the television era productions as "The Addams Family" and "The Munsters", genuinely white humor composed mostly of easy jokes, obvious double entendres and much slapstick (remember that this is a basically child movie and not a sophisticated comedy). Animation also may seem rudimentary, but is that when it comes to taking stock one is forgotten these details. Rarely has parodied the monsters of the Universal with both respect as here, the presentation of the characters is just great, excellent design of the monsters, the hell soundtrack, and there are unforgettable momentazo to stop a car. We have for instance Dracula dancing tap dance to King Kong battling an army of zombies bird men, and a fight for female puppet in underwear, starring the bride of Frankenstein and a femme fatale of reddish hair that has stolen my heart (is that me bad I can!). The such Francesca her ask for reyes.It is logical to think that where the rest of Americans save a Bible, Tim Burton has this film. In the table, along with your pills for insomnia and the comics of Edward Gorey.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1379

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El nombre de la rosa

muchocine

Medieval thriller of theological crimes, film noir with Gothic purple, very well done commercial cinema for enjoyment of the parish of lovers of Sherlock Holmes, by Borges and Caravaggio. Does anyone give more?

For a time was very considered that having read the name of the rose. Umberto Eco was a writer with more shadows lights for the general public and was the first time (not then the last) that a Professor of semiotics enfangaba in fictions rather than encouraging as it was, that is, brainy unaffordable for the uninitiated title essay (reader in fable, apocalyptic and integrated or works open). They were all books of head of the College of letters or the always curious reader, hardened in thought, tireless diver filigree of, in the words of a good friend, the backroom of the language. After the book, best-seller, boom, milestone in the literature of consumption of the eighties, ECHO threw this acquired new fame and gave birth to their Apostilles to the name of the Rose: booklet of varia lesson in which the writer, as an extra on the dvd that we consume, interrogating the reader, questioned the nature of the fact of reading and gave, to galore, punches, files, anecdotarios, unrelated to the plot of the book, but interlocking chapters therein. And all this mass of reflections of literary writing about the film rope? A little of all that is the film that aroma of the same character (joyously semiotic, as I would like to echo) culturalist as the book. Annaud does not fall into the trap of making a film about a book: is obviously unnecessary, and Moreover, useless. Annaud recreates a detective-medievalist universe dirty, rough, relegating the abundant latines of the book and its corporeal theological discourse to mild strokes that do not alter, at any time, the agile spirit of his work. Let's say that the Eco Apostilles aquilinocarsin (very metaphorically written) in the movie: all thins, everything is simplified, everything is contaminated by a formidable precision, which differentiates cinema (Word in movement) with the literature (Word that requires the necessary decoder, i.e. the reader complicit).Annaud is ambitious: raises his film as a very demanding RAID in history and far from trying to monopolize a project that it was especially gratifying was accompanied by a director of photography mythical (Tonino Delli Colli) who drank in Rembrandt, Caravaggio to imbue its light the darkness of the abbeys of the middle ages. The plot of the name of the rose is very simple: on the eve of a Benedictine Abbey in a theological Summit some monks appear ominously killed. Friar William of Baskerville and his young disciple Adso of Melk seen the malign influence of a book. Crimes, books: nothing new.Behind there is a stark vision of the tyranny of the Catholic Church and the notable role of monasteries in transmitting (or hide or neuter) a culture. Own Librarian (magnificent tribute to Jorge Luis Borges) is blind. And the book that is cause of all the crimes is one of Aristoteles on laughter because to say Jorge of Burgos, the blind librarian cited above, laughter foreshadows the knowledge, its truth more playful and less controllable, and but do the longest review I transcribe what he says about it because there is no waste: "Laughter releases the villager in the fear of the devil, because on the feast of fools also the devil seems poor and stupid, and, therefore, controllable." But this book could teach that freedom from fear of the devil is an act of wisdom. When he laughs, while the wine gorgotea in his throat, the villager feels master, because he has invested relationships of domination: but this book podríaenseñar to the learned ingenious, and since then illustrious artifices that legitimize such investment. It would then be transformed into operation of the intellect what in the unthinkable gesture of the villager still, and fortunately, is the belly operation. That laughter is the man's own is a sign of our limitation as sinners. But how many corrupt minds like yours of this book drawn the extreme conclusion, according to which the laughter would be the end of the man! For some moments, laughter distracts the villager of fear. But the law is imposed through fear, whose real name is fear of God. And this book could skip the luciferin spark that go a new fire around the world; and the laughter would be the new art, ignored even by Prometheus, capable of annihilating the fear. "The villager who laughs, while he laughs, not cares die?"An absolutely masterful Sean Connery makes Friar William of Baskerville and gives the character of a lightweight spark of grace, eloquence and naturalness. Not so with a rookie Christian Slater in the role of the apprentice, whose hieratismo (then amplified with the years) equal should be up.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3985

Rafa Ferrer

Loverboy

muchocine

A simplistic tape television of fast consumption and where only looks "something" Kyra Sedgwick, the rest or even serve to highlight them all, bored to own and strangers.

How quickly have broken one of my good intentions for 2008, and it is that, he thought devoted the year 2008 to see "Good cinema" and, yesterday, while my wife was zapping, in some channel whose name I do not remember, put this film, that being the debut in the direction of the actor Kevin Bacon, is also more simple, sosasleeping, stupid, predictable, empty, and without any possible interest.Perhaps, the only grace of the tape is in seeing how well that brings their 40 and many spring now-television (thanks to "The Closer") Kyra Sedgwick, or as Kevin Bacon once more becomes a (very well marked) character opposite to everything we know, Sandra Bullock, Oliver Platt, Marisa Tomei and Matt Dillon complete the cast in small rolescasually over the bulk of the film.Moreover, we face the umpteenth loaded with the usual telefilm which adds nothing, nor even comes to excite the Viewer, and that a server given desire to stay asleep on the couch (doubt if sometime I did for sure), on the other hand, and removing that a television film of this type can not ask you morea ridiculous exercise would be the requirement. I get no more, a simplistic television tape of fast consumption and where only looks "something" Kyra Sedgwick, the rest or even serve to highlight them all, bored to own and strangers.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4213

Tito Chinchan

Familia

muchocine

Opera prima of Leon de Aranoa that shows a bearded man and his family. Extremely original, at times funny, at times emotional, at times it lasts and sad, is obliged vision for anyone who likes a SIP of good cinema.

Director: Fernando Leon of AranoaDuración: 97 minutes.Release date: January 23, 1997.Espectadores: 151.333 of human beings.If you have not seen this movie, I recommend that you stop reading this review right now. It is not think reveal nothing, is that better see her virginal, how maiden of the harem of Ataulfo manso, that warped how Pamela Anderson in pneumatic dreams of millions of anonymous onanistas. Warned you aloan. The first time I saw this movie, I caused much impression. To begin with, for the first 10 minutes that you caught so of surprise that you do not know or think. And then this is a dramón, camouflaged in a curious way of comedy but a tragedy that leaves you rather squashed. That if, between mean you laugh.The film is about the celebration of the birthday of a father. And here I can read without muss nothing.The directorial debut of Fernando León de Aranoa (is not the cousin of Ferdinand to make Opera, as I pointed the other day) turns out to be a very funny movie, and above all very original. That I don't forget, many years ago, one of these bipedal vipers of the programs of the heart attacking this director that had gone with the same shirt as in the previous gala of the Academy Awards. There is the cultural level of a country, what we change clothes (if not tell him now, then I forget). Total, than the actors they do very well its role, history requiebros you put again in the movie if you sales at some point, and the end has apotheosis moments. To see a Sunday afternoon calmly.In short, directorial debut of Leon de Aranoa that shows a bearded man and his family. Extremely original, at times funny, at times emotional, at times it lasts and sad, is obliged vision for anyone who likes a SIP of good cinema. It is not the best, but it stands very much among the rest.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3968

Andrés Pons

La terza Madre

muchocine

Appears to the Mise en scène of a vulgar movie, special effects are joke, the non-existent picture, the script nor means demonstrating the fall dive of the erstwhile wonderful director if recalls other mediocre titles shot lately as the player or insomnia.

No! Noooooooooooooooooooooo! Thousand times I will continue denying it the master ARGENTO! Remember the other two parties? SUSPIRIA and INFERNO were the highest flight of the great Italian director than before already left its dark red or zoophilia trilogy. They were not films about zoophilia I refer to those titles with names of animals, the bird with the Crystal plumage for example.All these works reflected the extremely macabre artist brand, where the killings were shot as if it were a precious painting, music wanted to be devastating in the work of GOBLIN, aesthetics seeping elegance on all four sides. That artist dead and instead presents a third zero on all fronts, fatal his daughter ASIA ARGENTO which previously collaborated in Trauma or the Phantom of the opera, also saves the veteran UDO KIER which already appeared in the first part SUSPIRIA and is current with his participation in the ROB ZOMBIE HALLOWEEN.Appears to the Mise en scène of a vulgar movie, special effects are joke, the non-existent picture, the script nor means demonstrating the fall dive of the erstwhile wonderful director if recalls other mediocre titles shot lately as the player or just Insomnio.Tan some loose murder reminds us of his early works.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2776

Kiko de España

16 calles

muchocine

With the ugly that is the Billboard, almost required vision. A phrase: "the days change, the weather changes, people not change".

In front of me, six of thirteen children fight over a bucket of popcorn while the music sounds at full blast the song one of the start. Insurance that when our parents saw "Dirty Harry" this did not happen.And it is that "16calles", the penultimate film by Richard Donner (has announced "Sam George"), he is one of those classic Street films, the Eastwood, although belongs to the "new thriller Street", as "Last call".By the way, should be respected qualifications by age of the movies, to avoid the muchachada palomitera; If the movie is for 13 or older and you have 13, do not enter, son of a bitch. Eight in the morning are past, and Jack Mosley has to present in court before ten, Eddie Bunker.El corrupt police force will try to avoid it. Donner Renews with pulse firm, leaving behind the ballast that was "Timeline", failed adaptation of the best seller of Crichton, and the players respond, especially a great content Willis. It is one of those tapes "of before", i.e., to witness the hijacking of a bus, it comes to mind "Suicide route" before "Speed", without despising the entertaining film of Bont. The top five of Donner.Con ugly that is the Billboard, almost required vision. A phrase: "the days change, the weather changes, people not change".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3247

Andrés Pons

La sabiduría de los cocodrilos

muchocine

The steps of the horror film, is really strange where tapes of low-value type SAW end up becoming classics of immediately, while small jewels are cruelly neglected since their premieres.

The steps of the horror film, is really strange where tapes of low-value type SAW end up becoming classics of immediately, while small jewels are cruelly neglected since their premieres.Nearly a decade of time a then unknown JUDE LAW "of highly topical at the moment with the imprint" gave us a fascinating character under the tutelage of the Asian PO CHIH LEONG interesting TV movies horror author "The House of the Lake and continuation". Between the side we were with good performers that they gave perfectly her replica to the young actor. TIMOTHY SPALL a mortadella of great efficacy seen in the last samurai or ROCK STAR among many others and JACK DAVENPORT participated in the millionaire saga of Pirates of the Caribbean.The film is an entire universe where the intrigue plays a critical role not knowing is at no time is the main character. From the start we know that it kills women but the question is why?The film is one proposal to philosophical unanswered where what matters is not the usual carried the Viewer on a journey without return between love or survival. All this adorned by a music and photography that immerses us in the strange world where the characters move.A final which explains half the terrible situation of the converted predator in victim going through a really terrifying time mixed by a passionate love story.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2038

Jose Contreras

Diarios de la calle

muchocine

Films of charismatic teacher happens to them as well as passionate lovers. One believes, but at the same time knows that it is better not to return ten years later, with the camera so it could find.

"Diaries of the street" is like watching Jack Nicholson taking my kids of HD in a sailboat while Dr. Ratched werecat shouts that it is time to take the medicine. Since the Sydney Poitier taught his dwarves to make a salad at the Institute, the world of cinema has flooded of charismatic teachers who dream of conquering the Immaculate minds of our tender teens. Antonio Banderas it was trying to modestly with the ballroom dancing. Mr Kitting went too far in the club of dead poets. The Forrester of Forrester discovering taught nothing, but served to the kid to hesitation of famous author. Dangerous minds Pfeiffer Michelle is the most similar to the protagonist of this film, because the guys are all about desmelenados offenders, and resolves the issue involved with them. "The least similar to Erin Gruwel Professor is the Mr Chips of Goodbye Mr Chips, because it does not arise as a"pitch"educational, but also as managing a whole life devoted to teaching.""Diaries of the street" is essentially true. Teachers sometimes live situations in occurs them something special, oasis of understanding. Erin Gruwel narrated your oasis in a book which was a collection of the diaries of their students and what we now have in film. He ran the year 94. The revolt of Los Angeles was still alive. Police clubbed to Rodney King and an excessively clemente judge left out in freedom those responsible. The country erupted in flames during a week. This all happened in the same country that wanted to set an example to the world of peaceful coexistence.Erin Gruwel has at that time 23 years old and doesn't know do with a multiracial class that either screams, fights, either or makes pellas when it wants to impose on them where have to sit. There is no communication until a student ridicules a black of the class. Erin responds hablandoles of the nazis and the course starts to listen to. I don't know about that would talk about the American film industry if Hitler would have lost the elections of the 33.La teacher works extra hours to buy them new books. The students are stunned. One smells like yours, smells like new. The topic could be is necessary spend more that pupils be involved? As all the teachers that connect with their students, she has to contend with the conservative sectors who want to do the same as always. His head of language Department opposes: that is doing is not exportable, does not serve as program, is a special relationship that can not be repeated each year. And it is partly right, the relationship with a group can live as something unique and special. But a career means a line of work, a habit which can be repeated every year. The film lives of certain mirages. The films of love always speak of eternal love. It is easy to love forever during one hour and a half. Films of charismatic teacher happens to them as well as passionate lovers. One believes, but at the same time knows that it is better not to return ten years later, with the camera so it could find.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1777

Bloody Will

300

muchocine

Perfect combination of gross and consistent action argument. This film is the cane! The best of the year 2007, long and long...

Many hours dedicated to this film lead inevitably to a viewing with your eyes wide open. That does not escape the script, do not escape the actors and, by God, there are no to close those eyes to the half hour of the film. So much anticipation is often the worst enemy of a good assessment, although I have not sat to see her with the idea to scrutinize each of the details of? 300 ′. Perhaps that is why I can say that this film is the cane!. The best of 2007, long and long.From that I saw?Infiltrators? He had not returned to feel that wild and illogical concern see as they are falling one after one on the screen. ? 300 ′ is violence, violence and more violence. The dialogues uphold such violence. The actors poses increase such violence and the excellent cinematography of the film is the result of violence. The rooms are going to fill with people who shouts on par with Leonidas? do Spartans!?!!!! While they plague the wind as if they had swords.Is this the film that consumará your revenge against your girlfriend by this time that you got to see?The journal of Noa?. Mind you, I'm not saying by machismo that is a film of uncles, but Snyder has been riding a 2 hour maxi-battle that must be addressed with a high level of testosterone. An example: my girl saw the first half-hour until Leonidas turned blood. There is over everything for her.The argument is simple: Leonidas hates the Persians. The Persians want to Sparta. Leonidas travels to deal with 300 men to the thousands and thousands of Persians. Fight. Battle. Blood. Mutilations. More fight. More blood. Female genital mutilation is quintuplican?The merit of Zak Snyder is that, with a great graphic novel by Frank - genius-Miller, it has managed to make an excellent movie without decay tension, interest and entertainment not even a second. That much is due to the history of course Council of Miller, but how many times have seen a good story in the hands of a sleepy firecracker. The succession at the battle of ordas Asians which Leonidas and company face becomes increasingly more stimulating, both visually and so fun watching the kids handing out everywhere. Do with? 300 ′ or leave the eyes of the screen? only perhaps to remove this imaginary splash of blood.Gerard Butler can only say that there will not be another pu ** ca ** Spartan better than him. They gave me desire to sign up with Leonidas where necessary. I'm going with him to kill Persians, not Persians, elephants or whatever you want. It me yell of Spartans!, that I shot to del rio if necessary.!! Lena Headey, the next Sarah Connor, is the wife of Leonidas, and surprised the hu ** gives her throughout the film. This really sends, and the sensual and sexual of his character is just know that if it were not for his son, would be with Leonidas auctioning firewood. Unrecognizable Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes. This guy, appearing 3 minutes in?Los Angeles Charlie 2 ′ is one of the additions of?Does lost?, and as king Xerxes exits. One of the best villains we will see this year.What fails: the character of the hunchback Ephialtes. It adds nothing. And that a lot of people can remember you to?Trojan? mixed with the bad ost ** Robert Rodriguez. Do course? 300 ′ has nothing to do with the rest of pseudo-peplum that have visited us recently. If you think you attend a historic lesson, let him be for the history channel. They are 300 Spartans against a million Asians, so wait only brutality until there is one Standing left.With the aesthetics of comics green-screen gives? 300 ′ are two hours more acoj ** are going to spend in the film long overdue. Perfect combination of gross and consistent action argument. Should you avoid the purchase of arrojadizos objects (popcorn, bottles, cheetos, a simple red licorice) If you will not be tempted to use it against the brat that sits below, that since that I have seen him at the entrance to him I want to?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1200

Oscar Cantero

El Fondo del Mar

muchocine

Failed attempt to emulate an atmosphere of concern than ever is at the height of what its director has proved that it is capable of doing.

Since I was pleasantly surprised with time of brave (whose criticism can also be read on this website), I was curious to see the bottom of the sea, earlier work by the own Daniel Szifron and the production company falls within the genre of suspense or thriller. I do not think I that can quite exactly fit into none of these categories; rather it is a kind of drama tinged slightly distressing, as if it intended to create the atmosphere so persecuted hitchcockiana on many occasions.All this without fail to recognize some merit in the cohesion of the script, very coherent and well assembled, as well as interpretation sober and correct all its cast, with the curious appearance testimonial by way of caneo, a then semidesconocido Diego Peretti, current figure indisputable Argentine film on their own merits.In any case, the film is predictable and disappointed not found with no surprises or plot twist. The film is therefore too flat, which makes it a bit boring at times, because it adopts a tempo excessively slow for the story you want to tell. And more if it is above to qualify thriller. Released in 2003, does any allusion to the situation political economic of the country at that time, that focuses on a few characters of economic level, how much less, medium high, that oddly enough, still exist in the spoiled country that once was an economic powerhouse that went to the aid of Spain when most needed.In general, a little disappointing after the high expectations I had created with time of brave. Although perhaps the blame is mine by first seeing the most current film and leave for later the oldest, when its director was much less expert.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2711

Rafa Ferrer

Turistas

muchocine

Bad very bad, to get bored, no wonder that they have taken centuries (rather leave for the summer it) in release.

Welcome to the refried summer!!! There was no originality among many of us goods was by all known, and is that, for a time this part, what it does not copy the Japanese film, is it plagiarism of other films, but sequels, superheroes or the mother who bore them, then to say that it is a tribute (issue fixed).This film is intended to be, without success, that already got "Hostel" (and its sequel) Eli Roth. That is, group of young people with claims of having are deceived and converted into guinea pigs (never better said).John Stockwell is beginning to see "the Duster" with this type of film, and in their hands (and shoulders) are tapes as the insufferable "on the edge of the waves", or the summer "immersion lethal" is this a worthy successor of Uwe Bowl with this crappy summer Court cinema?Josh Duhamel, regular series "Las Vegas" and lately more famous thanks to "Transformers" film and Melissa George (to which I remember as one of the villainous series "Alias" and wife of Ryan Reynolds in "Horror in Amityville" (remake of the film of the 1970s), led by a cast of those in which one expects from the first minute of footage that make how much more "matarile" better and if possible of the) It is cruel and bloody, better than best.I am however good the pretext of the sale of organs, as in vogue in these times in which we are and more in Brazil and Latin America in general (with their dark urban legends), but the impunity of the surgeon is the same rich product of Tarantino would-be killers (and that unlike "Hostel" is not produces). Offices of tourism of Brazil and Slovakia will be contentísimas with the tapes, soon to my was I happened to go to Brazil, but when they begin to kill people me I take the first flight to Barajas.Mala very bad, even bored, no wonder that they have taken centuries (rather leave for the summer it) in release.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2140

Rafa Delgado

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

Definitely, I was delighted, although I'm still preferring the curse of the Black Pearl. Definitely, I was delighted, although I'm still preferring the curse of the Black Pearl.

Pirates of the Caribbean saga already had me captivated since the release of the first installment, the curse of the Black Pearl, which I consider one of the most exciting, entertaining and fun of the current decade fantastic adventure films.The second installment, dead man's chest, do not disappoint me, but could not overcome the bar very enjoyable part. The charm was no longer the same, and was not what they expected and wished for this saga: autoconclusivos chapters to Indiana third Jones.La Awards, the end of the world, which premiered worldwide on Thursday, means a dignísima continuation of the adventures of Jack Sparrow and the troupe around him, and the consecration of the saga of Caribbean pirates as one of the best (and most profitable) that has given birth to the industry the film. Riza curl until exhaustion, but what Earth, how well does it. And also it doesn't fool anyone.It's a film of fantastic adventure as the top of a pine. In this occasion, unlike its predecessors, more fantastic that adventure. This breaks a bit with the general tone that was taking the saga until this third party, but the pure spectacle which means all she justifies everything.Pirates of the Caribbean: At the end of the world is long. It lasts nearly three hours, but however to me is I have not nor long or heavy. You have not found me a nearly three-hour film. He has kept me encandilado, stuck in the seat from the beginning until the end. And how I appreciate that!Made me laugh most of the gags, which are not few (large cameo by Keith Richards!); It has made me enjoy scenes of action and of all the perfect technical Bill that has the movie (wonderful soundtrack and prodigious design art, accompanied by the best and most spectacular special effects that were able to see on the big screen during this decade); In addition to excite me with the sequences intended to do so.A moment of embarrassment. a I only bostezo. It has not left me a moment of respite.Definitely, I was delighted, although I'm still preferring the curse of the Negra.Defraudan Pearl their ballasts: total wastage of some characters and situations, and its excessive length, totally unnecessary, taking into account that the argument is so little thing, although it has seemed more complex than what might appear.Turns out to be less sympathetic, more serious and dark saga film, but however has the largest number of gags and extremely hilarious and surreal situations (multiple Jacks! the wedding in full battle!) of the trilogy.In short, gentlemen, entertainment and spectacle in its purest form. It is true that the script is nothing out of this world (in my opinion is not very well written: halfway through the film multiple frames are entrevesan so that one can be a liar), but when one have remained encandilado in this way for almost three hours, what the hell, a tomar por culo script and other tiquismisqueces we always take into account.If cinema is entertainment, the film was created (sagas) movies like this.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3702

Andrés

Amor en la tarde

muchocine

Perhaps for the public today's the age difference between Cooper and Hepburn is somewhat difficult to digest, but remember, were the 1950s. Be a playboy took her years.

Formidable comedy about the complications in a relationship. Maurice Chevalier is the best private detective in Paris, the city of love. His daughter, Ariane (Audrey Hepburn), lives fascinated with the glamorous world of illicit lovers known to imply through the archives of his father. One day Chevalier informs a client that his wife deceives him with magnate Frank Flannagan (Gary Cooper) and the man rises in his search to kill him. Ariane decides to prevent Flannagan without explaining the reasons, leaving him fascinated by the mystery. Taking advantage of their knowledge of the life of the playboys, Ariane conquers the womanizer Frank making him believe (and suffer) is a girl so experienced and scheming like him. Daring for its time, in this movie Wilder criticizes the moral double of a society that entroniza monogamy but lives pending of the alcove of the famous secrets. Preventing problems with censorship, images of a solitary forest allude splendidly the sexual encounter between lovers. Perhaps for the public today's the age difference between Cooper and Hepburn is somewhat difficult to digest, but remember, were the 1950s. Be a playboy took her years.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3024

Francisco Bellón

En la ciudad de Sylvia

muchocine

In the city of Sylvia is a failed experiment to show to the public the search undertaken by a man to find a woman, and along the way, offer the throbbing heart of a city.

Scarcely a month ago he concluded the 64th Venice Film Festival of cinema, the best edition of the Biennale in many years. There is nothing as the wounded pride to react and straighten the course. Unfortunately, very little Spanish film could be seen at the festival, with honorable exceptions, having only a homeland tape in the Oficial.Dicho section film was in the city of Sylvia, the new work by José Luis Guerín, filmmaker that amazed and excited many for his documentary under construction. Barcelona director returns to his roots to a fictional story, closely linked to the physiognomy of a big city, its places and its inhabitants. A boy (Xavier Lafitte) recalls the encounter he had with Sylvia six years ago, and decides to undertake his search in places frequented, one day find her believed, and begins to follow her. It must be said in advance that in the city of Sylvia is a type of film that seeks a very minority audience, and must go to see her with an open mind, without bias or ideas preconcibas. However, aren't needed many minutes so that the viewer feels invaded by a terrible feeling, the of the here what I paint? The film oozes so much pretentiousness and pedantry can up with the painted. It is not only the complete lack of dialogues is annoying, is that Guerin spends almost all of the minutes trying to demonstrate his great handling of the camera with flat impossible, at the time that aims to show an accurate reflection of what feel and live the inhabitants of a large city. Even has the support that would offer two major interpretations already that Pilar López de Ayala is limited to be, while Xavier Lafitte is something soft and very little credible.In the city of Sylvia is a failed experiment to show to the public the search undertaken by a man to find a woman, and along the way, offer the throbbing heart of a city. However, you will only get numerous spectators who come to see something different, to flee terrified as soon as the room lights are lit.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4131

Natalia Eseverri

En el valle de Elah

muchocine

A new success of Paul Haggis and van...

From what he had heard about this movie, I stayed with the phrase that was much more critical with the war of Iraq to Lions for Lambs, tape that excited me by his critical truthful and voracious, towards the involvement of the Iraq war United States. And he did not think that a successor could overcome it.And the truth is that I still have that impression. In the Valley of Elah tells desperate struggles of a father to find his son that are mysteriously missing. Then, the messages offered to the viewer are: the feeling that have many parents, especially those who have belonged to the army as the protagonist, know perfectly to their children and the less predictable impact of young soldiers that they come from a war so hard as it may be Bosnia or Irak.Ese kind of messages are not critical of the American performancerather they reflect a situation occurs in which not even notice and that the great Paul Haggis has been able to display perfectly in the film, after reading in a newspaper article the real story told in the film. But obviously I'll take criticism of Redford in Lions for Lambs, ironic and have managed to show from three different points of vbista.In this, we are a great story told with the mastery of this writer that never ceases to surprise us, some magnificent performances, only reflected at the Oscars for the nomination of Tommy Lee Jones, but that is perfectly accompanied by this great actress so versatile is Charlize Theron, which I keep admiring, and not least for those few minutes but of great artistic quality, of the always unique Susan Sarandon.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3540

Ana Belén Pacheco

Persépolis

muchocine

Persepolis is a round film to get a decent balance between the doctrinal content and action. He has been a revelation and one of the animated films more advisable I've seen aimed at adult audiences.

The proposal for this year of France to the Oscars is going to make it very difficult for the film "ordinary", while presenting an animated film was already risky, do with Persepolis is even more controversial. Based on a graphic novel by Marjane Satrapi with clear autobiographical vocation. The Ribbon is a social and political criticism of the political reality that lived Iran and continues to live today from the experience of Marjane, a girl that will grow with the change of regime and seeing how this affects her family, friends and relationships. From their own country of origin and from exile will change your way of looking at life. Discover the music, love, repression, fear, the role of women, totalitarian regimes and take correct and incorrect decisions always supported by a family that her educates and protects.Some argue that the candor of the children is the best mirror to appreciate a story that children are not able to judge or control the story. I think that normally it is not true that the vision of the child only justified as the kid to behave and not the reaction of the Viewer to what is infant alive. This tape is a clear example of this. Persepolis is a round film to get a decent balance between the doctrinal content and action. His aesthetic, fully adapted from the comic strip to the screen is just balanced, effects and Illustrator. Despite the clear prejudices that had before seeing her I must admit that Persepolis has been a revelation and one of the animated films more advisable I've seen aimed at adult audiences.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3103

Tito Chinchan

Payasos Asesinos Del Espacio Exterior

muchocine

Film series (b) where a few clowns assassins from outer space made a stop on Earth to take a snack. Frankly I recommend it see, unpretentious, just eager to take a beer and a laugh. Insured.

Currently, the names of the films are enigmatic and strange, as trying to delude ourselves to disguise that films are hiding behind them empty and based on special effects without ton or they are. Yore, had names such as "Killer clowns from outer space" which is not if not a summary of the film. If you ask what is the movie, you will rapidly repeat the title and ready. Certainly the name can take back, but friends, they know not what they are lost.The film is a village type of U.S., where couples are engaged in a brickpit fornication, police believe to be judge Dred and the word hooligan hear without that nobody look at you as a contemporary of Methuselah. Suddenly, a meteorite falls from the sky (if it falls from the ground to outer space would be the host) and a circus tent, off which stand a few clowns that appears in the place of impact is lian to put people into a ball of cotton of giant sugar to go comiendoselos with a straw coiled. Tempting, isn't it?See that the film not attracted me almost nothing, beyond of to bring it to give birth with taste and cruelty. But ete here that we have 100% of those that will surprise you by the strange thing, but that you like by well prepared is an original screenplay. Well, it is not art and essay, but I direis than a few clowns that comes from space, that their weapons are of toy, pulling popcorn that move and become bugs of those emerging from the boxes with a dock that you wrapped in cotton of sugar that their spaceship is a tent, etc, is not to give him a chance. The make-up and decorated seems great, beating many of those made today with computer. And is that they are more human, more believable, and even tangible. I was delighted.In short, film series B where clowns assassins from outer space makes a stop on Earth to take a snack. Frankly I recommend it see, unpretentious, just eager to take a beer and a laugh. Aseguradas.genial, no more.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3377

Rafa Ferrer

El viaje de Chihiro

muchocine

Disney has died, Japanese animation has earned her a 500%!Hayao Miyazaki is the worthy successor!

I quite like the cinema of animation, usually do a couple of films of this genre all the months, I do not remember who I once said Miyazaki was currently the reference this film and that he saw no ANIME was as if it was "dead and buried" so he had a stint with the DVD of "The journey of spirited away" on the tableIt is true that one day I had thought seeing her with "my kids" but did not, and another day had the movie in the player I got my bad sister and I had to call the doctor and since I caught it as a kind of "Juju" to the film, will that everytime someone spoke to me of "Chichiro" (as I call it) I closed strong eyes, and close them after the explosion of a firecracker, temiendome the worst. However, I have taken advantage of this afternoon, to see it! and nothing has happened! (I'm live and my family also), the film, a prodigy of Eastern animation and a movie that certainly could have been conventionally is certainly a landmark film, were not wrong that recommended me. It is true that it has certain air "Heidi" "marco" or any of the ANIME that have come to our country, forgive if not very ducho "Cowboy Beepop" in this field, so I think that it will be the first time that I write something I almost know from hearsay, "Kimagure Orange Road" (which I think it was a manga) and little else. I have little knowledge of anime and manga (Note mental. study over the issue, so that the next not notice that I am as "fish" as Nemo). No doubt if I can say that the film has excited me, with an air to "Alice's adventures in Wonderland" with such - cometé this to not disappear - some references to "The neverending story" (flying white Dragons) and other things that have made me stay with their mouths open and embrace my wife on the couch very satisfied by what he was seeing, while the two sonreíamos, as two young children by what we were seeing, and even us dabamos account that perhaps Hayao Miyazaki had bottomed in our hearts. The soundtrack magical, 30metre, direct and intense, big, very big with moments that fill the film music and make you're almost stuck to everything that it happens with the eyes as dishes. In short: Disney has died, Japanese animation has earned her a 500%!Hayao Miyazaki is the worthy successor!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4311

Ivan Villamel

John Rambo

muchocine

A film that despite a flat script, a few mediocre performances and topical development, manages to reach the virtue of fun through a beautiful scenes of action, full of stark and non-political violence.

During those warlike 80 years (could well be the title of a compilation of film action cinema bombings), arose a number of actors who fired his popularity playing crude heroes action, in many case touching patriotism reactionary, or in the best of cases, without even being patriotic. Names such as Steven Seagal, Van Damme, Charles Bronson and Arnold Schwarzenegger were commissioned to show us that subtlety is not part of its portfolio of skills. Nevertheless, earned the approval of the public with products where the only trump card played in his favor was a departure violence cool appealing more primary instincts of the human being, and thus of the Viewer. Among them was a character named John Rambo portrayed by Sylvester Stallone, whose first film, back in the year 1982, showed us the complicated return home of Veterans of the war of the Viet Nam, and its extreme difficulty to adapt to daily life, being also little considered by their own Government. In the first film, name "Rambo", attempted to draw an effective portrait of these ex-combatants, and although the film was a solvent product, interesting even, stayed pretty on the surface, using their plot excuse as a pretext to develop what ultimately interested the participants of that project, pure and hard action. Its two sequels, "Rambo: Rambo II" and "Rambo III", as its argument a cluster of reactionary situations mostly would come shortly after to describe in a dangerous manner the intervention of the former soldier in conflict away from its own competence. Especially bloody was the third party, where, in an ironic wink of the destination, the argument placed as comrades of fight to the American Government and the sector extremist who has now posed a threat to its thriving imperialism. All this accompanied by a story full of topics and several chascarillos.Twenty years later comes close to this series, again performed by Sylvester Stallone needed immediate success, and in the hope of finding ourselves with a product the less respectable after the correct "Rocky Balboa" (his previous film, a respectable and entertaining film in development, quite satisfactory but is attends him with too many expectations). "On this occasion, Furthermore, undertakes to direct this"John Rambo"(of"Rambo"name to dry on the American market), a film that retrieves a way of making action films lost in oblivion, and involving the closure of the saga.""John Rambo" shows us the contemplative life that enjoy well-known character in his advanced age, devoted to fishing, catch snakes for a typical show of such demonstrations and wandering aimlessly fixed on some corner lost near the Burmese jungle rivers. When a group of Americans with the intention to trace the River to give humanitarian and medical aid to a Burmese Village, the first reaction of Rambo is tell that it is not a good idea, and refuse to do so in resounding. Finally, by the intervention of a woman (who but) that accompanied the humanitarian aid group, Rambo agrees to carry them up the river and keep them there, intending to return inland themselves. When the plan is twisted and they are captured by the more radical section of the oppressive army Burmese, a group of mercenaries, in collaboration with Rambo (although in principle his opposition to this was obvious), is preparing to rescue them from the barbarity that is lived every day in the Burmese jungles.Stallone is responsible, in his work as director of breathe a visual style recharged, oppressive, so in the taste of the most extreme war genre, in a mise en scene in which demonstrates (as did in "Rocky Balboa") a solvency to take into account when it comes to filming action scenes. Scenes like that opens the film with this macabre game from the Burmese army, they show that the less you know how credible and close a terrible fact, without artifice, form dry and direct. There is never a creative game between image and more director than to advance the narrative, but not why it is less effective. It is also true that the script of the film is extremely flat, devoid of double readings rather than obvious references to the horror of the war, and phrases that are quite ridiculous as that our dear Rambo lectured us with pearls as "live for nothing, or die for something, that really cause more sarcastic laughter that the dramatic effect that it intended to. And although it is true that this script, so it is sensed, leaves a lot to be desired, at least the story unfolds in a fairly direct way, without resorting to script twists that make even clearer the shortcomings of this mindless action product.And it is that the acting section also a truism that scare, removing small nuances of the actress in the role, Julie Benz (known primarily for being the object of desire of Dexter, in the series of the same name), you know give some interest moral dilemma and the suffering the horrors of the war cause it. Of the rest, curiously highlight the degree of absolute nihilism, beyond good and evil, which has acquired Rambo as a character, while this time correct for what was his "absent" performance. The other characterizations of characters are all prototypes of characters already seen thousand times in the war film, with a group of mercenaries which resembles any similar production of gender (some character reminds of irretrievable way certain characters in that wonderful "predator"), and that in addition, do not seem to much endeavour to do better.With all these elements, one might think that the final product is a negligible by-product for consumers of live video, or lovers of the less demanding action. But it is not precisely the case of "John Rambo". And if not so, it is precisely by the previously annotated ability of Stallone to create truly effective action scenes, violent until the end, in a display of incorreción inevitably reminiscent of eighties movies, one that obviated any visual consideration to show us scenes which more violent.Stallone is responsible for offering us a feast of desmembramientos, amputations, GLUGs blood, several explosions and even children's violations, causing a surprise the bystander effect by atypical of the proposal in the current film genre. With regard to this issue, to clarify a couple of important points about glorification of violence as the host of the story. Demonstrates a tremendous ability to overcome setbacks in the form of non-existent through choreography precisely this orgy of blood posed the ably distributed scenes of action throughout the footage, camouflaged with ability to his advanced age and poor ability to choreograph scenes, moments of savagery paroxista, in a plot trick does work, and that leaves a sense of privileged action scenes film (when an in-depth analysis)(, or even a second viewing will stop these alleged scenes, which are simpler than they appear in evidence). It is appreciated anyway, reactionary ideology shine by their absence resulting Rambo even less attached to any kind of ideology in this regard, because it helps those action scenes to justify more empathy for a woman than by anything else (if neglected their ballpark thoughts about his inability to get rid of the war as something inherent)(that they are extremely stupid to all lights).The other point that dominates such effective action scenes, is mounting. It is clear that American cinema it is advancing the action scenes with the level of ability by the editor in these scenes. In this case, it allows not only bolster the trick that used by Stallone to effectively distribute action scenes that seem to be more physical than they are, but also enriches and gives wings to the meaning of these scenes, making them integrated into the story very effectively. No doubt very successful mounting and it helps create the illusion of deep draught action scenes. No opta, for example, by the ability to impeccable place action that normally has the Asian cinema, but by advancing the physical action through a great visual montage. Extremely skilled and solvent, no doubt.Say that the influences of which the film baby are multiple and very mixed, attending even own self-referential sentiment for much of the history, as well as recall in its extreme violence to films such as the hongkonesa saga of "Men behind the Sun", with their various atrocities committed by sickly Asian General.As a result, a film that despite a flat script, a few mediocre performances and topical development, manages to reach the virtue of fun through a beautiful scenes of action, full of descarnada and non-political violence. For fans of the less demanding action.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/463

Red Stovall

Skizo

muchocine

The film is so badly bad that one ends up taking her to joke, managing to have some fun at the expense of a bad film. Is this bad? Man, the laughter is never bad.

There are movies of bad which are ending sympathetic resulting because everything in them causes laughter. In this regard I will always remember a by-product entitled 'Dead Heat' starring Kiefer Sutherland and should enter into the annals of history as the funniest crappy one can see. His screenplay is so bad and is filled with so many inconsistencies and so utterly hilarious dialogue that one does not stop laughing throughout the film. And no, it's not a comedy. 'Skizo' could enter fully in this group of films that viewing is a really rewarding experience, but not because the movie is good, but on the contrary. The film is so badly bad that one ends up taking her to joke, managing to have some fun at the expense of a bad film. Is this bad? Man, the laughter is never bad.The film tells how Gorka, a young waiter of the bar of the Institute, wants to impress the girl he likes, a daughter of rich Dad would in principle not be established in a waiter (when this profession are those that bind more in this world). So happens the brilliant idea of hiring a type to her it scared a little, our protagonist appears at the right time to defend it, and so she is love of its hero. But the thing is twisted and the case ends up becoming a kidnapping with ransom demand included and stay in an old house in the middle of the forest in which is found a curious character.The film is intended to be a horror film with the figure of the typical psychokiller. Or at least what you intend to in its final part, that so far the film is absolutely nothing. The starting point is totally amazing and ridiculous, not to mention how it carried out a plan that is even more ridiculous. The characters hardly exist, that they are not drawn. We have a waiter with the face of lelo which does lack organizing everything organised to impress a girl that already from the beginning is clear that is interested in him. Okay, the script tries to show that he doesn't notice that key detail, but it is that you it's not credible at any time. Then there is a posh and stupid girl that wants to have it all. A pimp who can not speak. And finally a patient of peculiar schizophrenia, and hence comes the minitítulo of the movie, up in that have saved since there is an alarming shortage of means, although this past should not be hindrance to make a good movie. Unfortunately, it does not.One of the biggest poblemas film is the ridiculous character plays Oscar Jaenada, a badass cool which gives them ready. I don't know if the intention of the director was to be funny at times. I like to think that, but it is that almost all the phrases of this character are misplaced and ends up taunting. And if there was an intention of doing comedy with respect to this character, because we must not only not a gag that works. Everything about him is ridiculous and is passed to the embarrassed laughter. In addition Jaenada is completely exaggerated in its interpretation, and although the macarro talk about the way in which he speaks, is not credible and is like a pegote which is not consistent with the rest of the film but that accompanies us during a good time. And a film of these carcterísticas must first of all credibility.Regarding Eloy Azorín say that it is a dull very carefully, and Bea Segura is very cute but nothing more. In addition both Star some oniric moments, which are by far the worst of a film already on its horrible. The work of Jesus Ponce is limited to shoot four characters, and any more get out there and try to create a climate of terror or of anguish that does not exist. Schizophrenic character is simply a helper that does not fear nor gives nothing, and on which the film pofundiza not the least, and hence may have developed a good plot, not the case because the film does not know where to focus.A crappy fledged, and that making case of what I said at the beginning, can make you spend a good time if you take it to joke. If not, will be a real ordeal. In either of the two cases, the chance of a second viewing is something that anyone be will happen by the head.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4258

Andrés Pons

Juno

muchocine

They are characters from the street, dysfunctional families which may well be your neighbors with a problem that can happen to anyone and is fable tells us the decisions carried out to confront the slippage of the protagonist.

In recent years the independent film surprises with unexpected successes with the plant facing the big blockbusters. Even the oscars recognize these works outside the Hollywood machine. Examples of surprising box office have in the recent little MISS SUNSHINE or between cups. Within these features we find the second feature film from JASON REITMAN after the also brilliant thank you for smoking. First thing to note is his young duo protagonist especially the wonderful ELLEN PAGE protagonist of HARD CANDY that you assume a simply brilliant future. Accompanied by another young promise to feature on supersalidos MICHAEL CERA. Between the side shine with their own light JENNIFER GARNER out of action movies where developed most of his career in films as DAREDEVIL or ELECTRA completing the cast a great JASON BATEMAN seen this year at the magic shop.This film do not expect great heroes, or same if certain characters or very intelligent people. They are characters from the street, dysfunctional families which may well be your neighbors with a problem that can happen to anyone and is fable tells us the decisions carried out to confront the slippage of the protagonist.Nice, fun with a really delicious musical choice, runs a feature film that connects with sympathy in the Viewer.Perhaps some dialogues are a little forced to break the credibility of the story. The truth is that I do not see many young people with this very biting language.Despite this small inconsistency, it seems a nice film in all its senses where breathes a positive message that keeps a remarkable narrative pulse.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4008

Oscar Martínez

Mimzy, más allá de la imaginación

muchocine

It brings together fantasy, science fiction and even mysticism equally in a solvent formula but forgettable once a server has left the film, but at least not makes us feel that we have wasted our money.

Directed by Robert Shaye and starring Timothy Hutton, Joely Richardson, Michael Clarcke Duncan, Rainn Wilson, Chris O'Neil, Rhiannon Leigh Wryn, Kathryn Hahn and Kirsten Williamson, The last Mimzy, translated here as Mimzy, beyond of the imagination, is a markedly child film although aimed at all types of public.While they are on vacation, Noah and Emma Wilder discover a box black floating on the sea. The box is very mysterious. Its bright surface of Onyx seems impenetrable and shines and vibrates as if it had its own personality. When the box is finally opened, the children are captivated by its content: a precious object of glass with a strange and supernatural, bright stones that irradian colors to turn and, in the background, what looks like a stuffed rabbit. Emma becomes fascinated with the rabbit, which seems to talk in whispers. She puts the name of Mimzy.Grata surprise was for a server Mimzy-beyond the imagination, not because it is a good movie, but by the mere fact that a markedly child film did me pull me hair.The film of Robert Shaye is pretty law-abiding in general terms, with a story that sounds like a mescolanza of other titles, children or not, and an extremely complex plot in appearance but ends quite understandable (and foreseeable) resulting. In addition, Mimzy, beyond of the imagination, brings together fantasy, science fiction and even mysticism equally in a solvent formula but forgettable once a server has left the film, but at least not makes us feel that we have wasted our money.With a halo of eighties air that pervades all his footage, Mimzy, beyond the imagination has not been able to leave remind me the fun explorers, Joe Dante (do you remember the legendary phrase I was weeks wondering why the hairy child did not speak?) it will certainly evoke the adults to their children/adolescents, which will keep more young people aware of the screenThanks to some good special effects, which are conspicuous by their successful lack of excess, and certain passages that may even be somewhat disturbing. And is that, somehow, the film can even remind us a sort of encounters in the third stage in child key.On the other hand, I must admit that the film of Robert Shaye is quite tedious in its first section to trace then surprisingly the flight, despite the somewhat odious interpretation of its young protagonists, and is that not all children are Jodelle Ferland. So, in short, we could say that Mimzy, beyond imagination is a good title if you you see the obligation to the Cherubim to the cinema, but it is perfectly surplus as a movie fan, that does not cinéfaga.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1882

Calaf

Sunshine

muchocine

The best, the snoring from someone from the seat back that seemed to form part of the sound effects of the spacesuits. Dolby Digital human, lol.

There are two film genres that usually me entertain with ease. The children's animation movies and science fiction. The last of the director of Trainspotting, the beach or 28 days later is the story of a space mission in the not too distant future where the Sun is dying and they explode a bomb to create a new star from the great Astro.Muchas times an absurd argument can give as a result a great movie. But this is not the case.To see it, made the mistake of trust of the commentary of the critic of the cadena SER, Theophilus the Necrophiliac film program: is closer to "2001" to "War of the galaxies" and has also elements of "Alien". It raises more than just special effects. If look like 2001 is has a central computer which also speak with the voice, pass, but otherwise he fails or at the bottom of the shoes. The dialogues are simple. So explain you everything what you are doing as if you were stupid, but then (due to a bad montage) do not you learn if they have already reached a site or location who at every moment. On 4 occasions they are deciding the lives of the crew with things as there is only a suit and must die, or there is no oxygen for so many and not to be sacrificed.Even the last quarter, with the introduction of one element or less surprising, just back the flight of a movie that not kept me interested except for some poetic attempt with the Sun as the protagonist.The best, the snoring from someone from the seat back that seemed to form part of the sound effects of the spacesuits. Dolby Digital human, lol.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/829

Mario

Saw 3

muchocine

Perhaps these productions does not contribute much to our beloved genre, but it is likely that in the era of the pay per view we can not aspire to much more.

On 11 November saw the light in our country the last, though certainly not definitive, delivery of the franchise more successful slasher of our times: Saw. Do for the third time in others many years (a record worthy of himself Woody Allen) have the opportunity to delight with the? games? Jigsaw proposed its not as helpless victims, with only the altruistic purpose of trying to teach them to correctly estimate the most precious: life itself.What started as a modest production, without many pretensions and indebted explicit films as Seven, has become, after his unexpected and enormous initial success, in a blockbuster of the genus, with huge advertising campaigns to their backs and unsolicited honour flag to the cinematic psychopaths of the twenty-first century.If we refer to the beginning, it is obvious that the inaugural impact of the virados arguments of the series (must take into account that the writers were well tanned in the glorious series of X-files cult) was becoming was the total alienation in its second installment. The argument of Saw II spit changes direction without ton or are pretending and getting artificial surprise the Viewer, in a way, that Yes, quite committed. If the plot mess became increasingly Baroque (and more fun in my opinion) the new approach given by the director of the sequel, Darren Lynn Bousman, not stayed behind. Doses of offal and viscera were multiplied, and the complex torture away increasingly from reality, giving it a more appealing, excessive film character in my opiniónPues well, if the episode progressed by a tricky way of excess, bypassing the first length of James Wan, this third time the bizarre escalation not only doesn't stop, if that gets to rise to unexpected extremes.The plot turns into a fascinating flurry, with absolutely cheats twists, evoking earlier episodes with shoehorn, but which do not stop being irrationally funny. From the perspective of the viewer the story returns to the starting point, with less involved characters and a plot more controllable, but, even so, no longer quite implausible. Bousman is exceeded not leaving caught up in the intricacies of the script and get to do more cash if possible. Focusing on this occasion in horror situations generated by the puerile moral dilemmas of the protagonist, in deciding who lives and who dies.If in each new installment the style of the movie becomes more and more excessive, as it could not be otherwise, you have already deducted the most admirable virtue of Saw III. In this version the violence evolves until a few scenes gore's most ferocious, producing uncontrollable downloads of adrenaline in the pass that I attended. Uncomfortable them sequences wouldn't let anyone, indifferent from the forced smile, until the vomiting that preceded the abandonment of the cinema (weak minds, not scared that you there is for both) to personally say that my proto-wife wanted to kill me by forcing her to contemplate such savagery (this if that is a martyrdom and not the Jigsaw, should think).The first 25 minutes of the roll overwhelm us with three consecutive torture to each which more gore and awful. The autofractura of a foot, the man crossed by chains, the container of acid? extreme situations that lead to our brain over a thorny road that ends in a State of insensibility feromonal, which protects it from what is to come later.Even taking into account the disposable motivations of the characters and the delusional attempt to marry this installment with the previous two, cannot be denied (at least I can't) the continuous enjoyment during the nearly two hours of footage, mixture of horror and recreation. If you are you looking for subtle psychological horror, or intelligent approaches, it is certainly not your movie. The impression that caused me personally is that the crew accepts definitely are doing pure rock´n roll and let themselves be carried away by the spectacle without asking questions.Saw III belongs to a generation of tapes that virtually since they could constitute a new subgenre of the horror film. With films such as Hostel or final destination (purée, and with unequal amount of success in each case) Saw stands as the flagship of stories where consistency is unimportant, and rejoicing and excess main thing. Perhaps these productions does not contribute much to our beloved genre, but it is likely that in the era of the pay per view we can not aspire to much more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4342

Emilio Martín Luna

Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión

muchocine

The truth is that it has many positive elements this film, but with the feeling of being a very touched history in film, with many aspects already repeated, a film whose purpose is to excite the Viewer, with difficult love, adversity and good background music.

One might ask in the first place without Joe Wright and the Minguella brothers were at the same Academy of cinema, or if they have any kinship or if Wright for being youngest admires the eldest of the Minguella, Anthony. I ask myself these questions by the resemblance of the works, in the formal aspect and its method of narration of his major films, Wright: pride and prejudice and the film I took in these moments, and, Minguella: the English patient, the talent of Mr Ripley (this only at the time), and Cold Mountain. All different movies, but with a cut film 1960s drama of times, lavish production, and very academic (translation: go to the Oscars). These are all great films, shot with a space of considerable time, aimed at an adult audience, British style, great deals and much pretension.My words do not want to extract that the film is bad, quite the contrary, simply that lets you "dejavú", ya I've seen, in another way, in another country, with other characters, even of different style, but I've already seen. Atonement, is a drama of time between wars, with the second world war in the background, Inglaterra-Francia. Two people who want and a terrible mistake. Production of primerisimo level, changing rooms, photography and an excellent soundtrack of Dario Marinelli, clear candidate for an Academy Award. Very good actors, being weak by James McAvoy since what I saw in the last King of Scotland, actor very believable, which follows in the footsteps of Jude Law, Keira Knightley, evoking the classic Hollywood actresses, physically and with his slow and steady work. And good side, as the young Saoirse Ronan (that will be the next Peter Jackson "from my sky") Vanessa Redgrave and Romola Garai. A script good and great direction of Joe Wright, I love these weather changes, with regard to what sees Briony (Ronan) and his subsequent explanation, can be messy, but as a final product gives a touch of distinction to the direction of this young director.The truth is that it has many positive elements this film, but with the feeling of being a very touched history in film, with many aspects already repeated, a film whose purpose is to excite the Viewer, with difficult love, adversity and good background music. It's interesting, entertaining and beautiful, like many others.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4027

Javier G. Pasamón

Saw 3

muchocine

Horrifyingly shot (a very mediocre director, no doubt), a script from the more simple with a plot that little people you can reach interested the slightest and above all an aroma of series Z (not even sympathetic) really alarming.

If a server the successful first part seemed a huge joke, at the same time, it served him to save that (presumably) vomit sequel, but now, thanks to the dvd provided generously by Buenavista, one has viewing the third part of this unnecessary and filthy trilogy (sextalogía road) and although it started from a level very low, the results in this installment manage to make us believe that still can be a more mediocre than the mediocre filmDespite the redundancy. While the first film directed by James Wan - sobrevaloradísima for large part of the public-was miserably dodgier, raving to try to play / mislead the Viewer without any justification, with tricks of cheap (and looking for the constant surprise, what made it more commonplace and fake), a montage disgustingly videoclipero and a bad taste more than evident, this third installment continues in this turbulent path.Aside from a script of the more implausible, ridiculous, inconsistent and up cochambroso, Lynn Bousman tape lives on the rehash of past deliveries (which has even more crime), copying the Manias of the other previous directors (mounting of video clip, start-up regrettable scene, mediocre photography, awful music and amateur performances) rather than innovate and renew (boldly)(, as for example did Nolan with Batman) a series that walks more burnt than the "Rocky" (which already is).Part of the macabre sr Jigsaw jueguecitos (sick terminal, but Duracell plan), we have some of the worst resolved "terror" scenes of last year and I don't think exaggerate with such an assertion. From camera moves sharp and accelerated which fail to stun the Viewer, flashbacks unnecessary reminders that emphasize too much and do not respect the intelligence of which is seeing the film, an invoice really poor with a mise en scene almost non-existent, a lack of aberrant suggestion (coupled with the lack of ideas, imagine the result ), some sequences which produce true grima to say the disgusting (there have the unnecessary and my scene of as) (Dr. bore the head of the murderer during the operation), because there are still who believes that bad taste can scare (ahem).Finally, a silly movie, there is no where to take her and I think an idiocy devote more lines. Horrifyingly shot (a very mediocre director, no doubt), a script from the more simple with a plot that little people you can reach interested the slightest and above all an aroma of series Z (not even sympathetic) really alarming.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2709

José A. Peig

Tren de sombras

muchocine

One of the most beautiful films has given the history of the universal film. No we have been able to explain it better; its qualities exceed the capabilities of any analyst.

They send us a copy of the film by José Luis Guerin (European production in 1997) accompanied by a warning, because the sender knows that long ago that we are going in search of great findings. Really, now, after the viewing, the palpitation and emotion directs each letter that, to harsh penalties, will try to put in writing what can only be and understood in the eyes of a God that has endorsed the significance of the image, or essence of the film.Of course, we said, not only cinema is technical, art. But art is more than aesthetics, especially when facing certain realizations to grow from an imaginative flight originated in a search so beautiful and placid as driver of the uneasiness that sinks. What we hope to go, without falling into excessive bombast; the seventh art is a mystery, and life is the portion of experienced image which may be seized, or at least we try desperately to apprehend and comprehend.The more I understand, more love, because all covered is good. The more I look look (not see) more love, because every image is hiding something from being. A being in time. A being in space. A being in the memory.Train of shadows is a look at the existence, naked, primordial, but at the same time dig in depth with the light of a watch is aging to find the past, and rejuvenate so that past and present hatch on an x-ray of a world subject to the rules of time and flows of the physical forces in the most recondite spaces of a homewhere nothing and silence are the best place to locate the prospect of a narrator. It is not a "nothing", in reality, it is an aspiration of a creator of images without words (in truth, what need does the world of words, when the film is the gaze of God?), sequences of rhythm and mounting that carry the look on the Tatty tapping on celluloid, to pause mode in which cinema is reborn to shed its light on the days of the life, and you'll see the Sunrise, you'll see in black and white the happiness of a family, you'll see the eyes of a girl who looks the sky, you will see people run through the field, look at the camera as if they knew that behind the camera there is a viewer that the look and makes questions about nostalgia and a sense of the passage of time for decades.The structure of the film is the structure of the lyrical and the "physical" time; from the past in a home full of laughter and silhouettes they do things that only a human can do, so far, the vacuum of the home, the tic tac of a clock that emphasizes the temporal impulse in each room, in each photograph, a curtain moved by the wind and the shadows moving while the sun goes falling on the horizon. Corners of the self. The universe would not be what is if there is a conscious entity that should dealt with its empty. As a poet who asomase his stunned gaze to the rooms, to the living and dining room, or on every shelf or picture: there is nothing, and yet there's something, the mystery, ultimately.The common thread is the same image that focuses the world with consciousness and intentionality, and establishes two fundamental accomplishments: the passage of time has a sensitive complexion, the Viewer may feel the same materiality of the time, of how the abstract can be humongous in an almost empirical feeling induced by the play of images. On the other hand, we have an essentially lyrical film, that uses its structures in order to delve into the metaphysical concept of time, i.e. in the mystery. Construct of time, and time it takes a concrete representation in each sequence. There are more, and it has stressed its intention to restore the purity of the film, but it is also a look at the life and the "depths" of the world. This is something intuitive and no explanation which we tried to give here could clarify the concept: something as simple as showing a floorplan of a street which leads to the river of a life that changes with the evolution of phenomena, or a moviola of images you are looking for - with almost desperate momentum - catch the essence of a face, the face of time, the illusion of retaining a footprint that never dies and the film wants to apprehend to dignify it, to go beyond. To understand life.If it has not been clear, one of the most beautiful films has given the history of the universal film. No we have been able to explain it better; its qualities exceed the capabilities of any analyst.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/304

Calaf

Domino

muchocine

Despite having interesting elements, spare you half an hour and too many small side entanglements that spoil

Thanks to my cousins Louis and Alfonso de viajarfacil.com for inviting me to the preview of the last of the director Tony Scott, brother of Ridley and author or producer of action and success of recent times always interesting tapes. Theirs include Tristan and Isolde (2006), the fire of vengeance (2004), Spy Game (2001), fan (1996) or the magnificent red tide (1995) and Top Gun (1986). Simplifying things is well known in film, or you have a good story or you can enforce the by the way to tell the tale. Master Hitchcock was more interested always in the how to in what this expert. An example, psychosis. Had not happened of mediocre a linear story of a schizophrenic masquerading as his mother to assassinate his motel customers. Hitchcock raised to the altars by his way of telling her, hiding details to the public and resolving at the end.What can not be in any way is having a complex plot and walking laps with the Viewer. If to this we add the unique visual style of Tony Scott (with rapid movement, close-ups, filters, etc), once again, valid as spicy in poor stories, without this being the case, the result is that in the middle of the Ribbon you have to more than half disconnected room and no real interest in the resolution, that anything is possible.The true protagonist is Keira Knightley, a character too cool. I dare say that the rest are secondary, including Mickey Rourke, that looks like of echo dust and finish when he saw him with sunglasses in the program Isabel Gemio.La peli has his good punches, as theories of miscegenation or the stellar appearance of 2 members of the series feeling of living by themselves. The visual dominance of Scott (poor editor) and the ability to put music is notable, but this movie, despite having interesting elements, spare you half an hour and too many small side entanglements that spoil.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/205

Daniel Galindo

Un franco, 14 pesetas

muchocine

A very correct directorial debut with a careful invoice technique and election of the cast

By tag will say that we we have a tragicomedy, and another hanging one more, say to a vision of the past style tell me. A formula that seems to give good results and not only by loyalty to members of a generation specific.Bittersweet printing that not everything is going to be a showcase of topics: the tender gaze of Carlos Iglesias to the past of many Spaniards as migrants, from a grey Spain, is dulcificada through a dose of sentimentality and humor, but raised and distributed by a calm, but not without rhythm and hook footage.Very round has left him this title, the first which writes, performs and leads in 90% of their sequences. A very correct directorial debut with a careful invoice technique and election of the cast becomes their card as a filmmaker. Without forgetting AzulOscuroCasiNegro, Un Franco, 14 pesetas was one of the most interesting proposals of the past Festival de Málaga, being receipt recognize the good wishes of the author to recall and anchor a forgotten of our recent history chapter.The Spanish landing in Europe during the 1950s and 1960s, which should establish as many comparisons with our present, has not enjoyed much impact film, except manners comedy style see you to Germany, Pepe, who once played a correct role according to the political intentions of the regime. Churches play with the real fact but also suggests ways to strike a balance maintained between the tears and laughter without that it almibarado to the dessert. Author of the screenplay, has rescued part of their memories and has mixed them with of as many emigrants returning that you narrated their stories. It was a long process, not expensive. Note to see the small tables that dot the action: winks to the culture shock upon arrival in a more developed country, the exaggeration of the passage through customs, the return to a strange country where the priests punished children for their misdemeanours of spelling and Franco (from the title, capitalized) was theirs as good feudal Lord. Do do the chorus of actors that accompanies the director acts supportive: Javier Gutiérrez, snow of Medina and Isabel Blanco? for more details, the young Swiss owner hotel - counteracting the prominence of the Iglesias-actor, excellent in his role? something tormented, put some glue. The fact that its interpretation tics had round-the-clock eliminated all burden of arrogance, that many players bring with them when it comes to being on both sides of the camera.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3884

Dragon negro

Mimzy, más allá de la imaginación

muchocine

Mymzy is entertaining and correct, which is already more than what they have done many other tapes of fantastic destined to the public child last year.

Noah and Emma are two brothers who one day found a box on the beach while on vacation. Inside the box are hidden foreign objects and a stuffed rabbit named Mimzy which soon become inseparable for Emma. Little by little children are discovered and used the box things will develop an intelligence out of the ordinary that will make them to discover the real reason and the use of the mysterious box and its components.Modest film that clearly seeks to entertain without many more claims that at least achieves its purpose. On the basis of an interesting plot, based on a short story written in 1943 by Lewis Padgett, the film takes clearly as a basis the great classic e. T. The alien, if even the boy protagonist is just going all day with the same jersey with CAP, and it develops under the same scheme. But the tape is playing its cards and introducing the mysteries of quite correctly and able to maintain attention on it during your footage, which is already more than what they have done many other fantastic tapes designed to the public child last year.Anyway be made in more lack of depth especially once discovered that is in reality the Teddy, have entered more the subject of science, who plays very on tiptoe. No longer a movie aimed at children anyway, everything is quite simple and easily digestible. The special effects are quite discrete, but are always based on the film and not as mere adornment.Mymzy is something more entertaining and correct what we usually find in this type of production, a funny and enjoyable film that perfectly meets the expectations.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3283

Ana Belén Pacheco

Death Sentence

muchocine

The only thing offered to us is an insignificant entertainment with the typical American hero whose amount of inconsistencies is endless.

They say evil tongues that everything is invented in the world of cinema. Originality is dead and we are witnessing the same movie over and over again with minor variations. The penalty is that some of these films are not only remixes of all of the above if not they don't have neither the vision nor the ambition to contribute something new or original to its predecessors.We say Death Sentece is an eye for an eye look American History X. If I'm going to a production of dubious quality and 95 to explain the reason that Kevin Bacon me bored. A family happy and perfect is destroyed because of a senseless murder, either a poor kid in a gas station or a poor girl in her own home. As we all know the American justice well has never worked so it is always better to finish the work yourself, while Sally Field is more well-behaved and leaves the justice to mess up and release the murderer for lack of evidence seems that Mr Bacon saw the previous movie and decided to boycott the trial to be executing his own revenge more bloody and sloppy hand.It is obvious that there is not much difference except that putting a man on the lead role gives the license allow more scenes of action and violence free to dress the footage.One of my multiple theories says that if a tape is not a comedy begins with recordings of home videos of a happy family often end up being an unmitigated disaster. In the case of Death Sentence only makes water, isn't totally disposable through the presence of Kevin Bacon which seems to have made a pact with the devil to not age and thus perform such diverse films (something like his colleague Nicolas Cage) so in the long run his name is no guarantee of a good product. Even more lost in this universe appears John Goodman in a role that surreal pure is even comical.The penalty is that the promotion is taken so enserio about its own product qualifying production Shakesperiana or Greek tragedy when in reality the Director of Saw the only thing offered to us is an insignificant entertainment with the typical American hero whose amount of inconsistencies is endless: how to learn to shoot a weapon a type that has never had a gun?, Why the police not stop you before?, is it necessary to shave you to look like a gang member?,.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/667

Ibán Manzano

La dalia negra

muchocine

De Palma the script he is big and finally decides to cover everything to catch anything.

I read once that site to the great stars of actors simple was the beauty of her face in ceramic. That is, the significance that reached his aura. In the last film of De Palma, Mia Kirschner, a.k.a. Elizabeth Short, the Black Dahlia alias is an aspiring star poses as actress, and that in part by strive to be first falls the second. In fact, in a few notable sequences of the film, an outraged casting director asks him why is unable to interpret the sadness. She says Yes you can but the frozen smile of his face betrays. Paradoxically, the only time in which Elizabeth Short looks pain before the camera is in the filming of a porn movie in which he never wanted to participate, but understood as necessary toll for their sueñosAsí in the same way that L.A. confidential, the novel of the Black Dahlia disfiguring also the golden age of Hollywood, basically because Ellroy followed the maxim of the black genre that defends that behind each crime always hides a tragedya story that deserves to be told. Why ficcionó the Black Dahlia murder even though Los Angeles police never managed to solve the case and it was used as a vehicle of a pitiless city, erecting is step in the great renewer of the American detective fiction. .Palm it seeks to the same in cinema through the stylization of levels, the tribute and simultaneously the modernization, but the problem of dahlia black film is that it has chosen a too complex story for his tour de force. Without deleting you subtramas, without ever knowing that history prefer to De Palma the script he stays big and finally decides to cover everything to catch anything. Captained by a group of stars that at least here have been far from being actors, the Black Dahlia is not so much that it is a bad film, as it is not authentic. In the end, it too has to do with this film served on silver platter with which Hollywood wrapped in luxury garbage and pornography. The same never could star in the Black Dahlia.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4095

Monica Jordán

Tiempos Modernos

muchocine

Through the introduction of the voice spoken in modern times Chaplin manages to carry his criticism beyond Taylorism and relate the manufacturing process with the sound with films.

The battle of Charles Chaplin against talkies (or for the silent film) is one of those constant struggles can be seen in each of the films made by the director since the appearance of the singer of jazz (1927). Already in the beginning of lights of the city (1931) single RAID sound dialogue is used as mocking the political power of the city but is in modern times (1936) and the great dictator (1940) where Chaplin puts all her cinematographic tools for silent film.The use of sound in modern times is mostly a comedic intent that helps the gags that make up the film. In that regard, Chaplin has does not hesitate to take advantage of advances in cinema to reinforce its expressive jokes through sound effects or to rely on them, as it is the case of the scene in which Charlie, sitting next to the wife of the Mayor, is suffering from gastroenteritis. It is at times like this when we realize that, despite the refusal by Chaplin to talkies, is aware that he can also take advantage of something that is why be so harmful for the film.Despite these discrete uses of sound in modern times are also spoken dialogue after which hide the views of Chaplin on the new film of the word. Mostly off voices that appear throughout the film come from machines (radio, the apparatus of food, etc.), these entities through which we are dehumanized man and that reduce the human being to pure capable devices only make a gesture towards the production badly called evolution. Through the introduction of the voice spoken in modern times Chaplin manages to carry his criticism beyond Taylorism and relate the manufacturing process with the sound with films. His point of view concerning both clear: neither of them benefits the man and leads to the continuous desensitization of the person and the film.Chaplin talkies sees the death of expressive capacity that both has cost him get on screen and believes will be the talkies which become simple talking busts actors limited to recite a few lines and coerced in his expression. This is reducing the expressiveness in the actor and limit the interpretation as up then known in the film. Similarly, the industrial revolution seeks to reduce the movements the worker makes in his post to take more advantage of the time factory. Both processes are similar as they set limits to human capabilities and is why criticism of the sound in the Filmography of Chaplin takes special relevance in modern times.Despite this refusal in talkies, and accepting that the music and sound effects are a worth contribution to the expressiveness of the film, Chaplin includes two unique characters that use the dialogue: the tyrannical head and the own Charlie. The first of the characters supports the duality of the criticism the industry and talkies to incarnate the tyrannical head that does not hesitate to exploit their employees and use their voice to express themselves. The second of these characters can be paradoxical if it were not because of Charlie (only) foray into the world of voice makes it singing and unintelligible language. Thus Chaplin used his humor to reinforce his idea about the "talkies" and send a message to all those who you want to see in the world of sound: if Charlie could speak, would be understood.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4366

elprimerhombre

Una noche en la ópera

muchocine

Although I paint the eyebrows and moustache, although I encorvara dragging the ground floor of a chaqué or jump into the arms of a woman, I could never be like him. I would lack talent and sympathy to be a tender nerve.

Elprimerhombre reminded the brothers Marx (Groucho, Chico and Harpo) in A night at the Opera, Sam Wood. Unlike the previous films, this are three brothers, no longer appears Zeppo, the youngest of the Quartet and he had also previously left the Group Gummo, who years later was associated with the same Zeppo agency representatives. After shooting goose soup, Paramount closed the contract to the Marx and MGM, in the hands of Irving Thalberg, considered the producer more ready and in the history of the cinema, opened them the door with the intention that his arguments were more credible for the Viewer. It was thanks to a game of bridge, where one of the opponents of Mr Thalberg was boy, whose gambling served so propose them making some movies, giving them a fixed salary and 15% of the profits. In the script for this movie collaborated several writers, until himself Buster Keaton, who drafted the best moments of Harpo and did the same in A day at the races and the Marx Brothers in the West. At the beginning of the film is priceless presentation of Groucho. Lavishing with intentional praise, Groucho reveals to Margaret Dumont his love towards her: "Do you know why he was with that woman?" Precisely because it reminds me to you. That is why I am now dinner with you. Because you reminds me of you. His eyes. His throat. His lips. Everything in you reminds me of you. Except you. I think that it is abundantly clear. I ahorquen that if I understand! "." The actress Margaret Dumont repeats the same role of millionaire women of goose soup, getting the funny jokes of Groucho. This woman had already spoken with the Marx Brothers in the theatrical versions of four coconuts and the conflict of the Marx. Then came one afternoon in the circus and big store in Goose soup, A night at the Opera, A day at the races. Groucho had much affection, even considered the fourth Marx Brother. The joke of "the Contracting Party of the first part shall be regarded as the Contracting Party of the first part" represents the paradigm of absurd and surreal humor. With barely a role that represents a contract, Groucho and Chico get a memorable, where at the end scene, after cutting clean clauses that are not interested in, only there is a strip of tiny, accepting both the contract without signing it. And what I say about the scene of the cabin, where a small carrier reach match 15 people. Perhaps the best joke of the Marx Brothers. Although the film was the most economically successful of the Marx Brothers, for my taste, what have left you to this film is the story of love so pompous of the protagonist couple, as well as the song "Alone" that sing two lovers before sailing, which also wanted to discard the Marx Brothers themselves. By the way, the subject that interprets boy at the piano, All I do (is dream of you), appeared later in the soundtrack from singin' in the rain. Definitely, I want to highlight the great Groucho, who died on August 19, 1977, three days after the death of Elvis. Although I paint the eyebrows and moustache, although I encorvara dragging the ground floor of a chaqué or jump into the arms of a woman, I could never be like him. I would lack talent and sympathy to be a tender nerve. A greeting! And two boiled eggs!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1056

Jeremy Fox

El camino de los ingleses

muchocine

Worse, in my opinion, the movie is no longer your script or performances or slow or your address. Worst of all is its pretentiousness, its intention to go deep and artistic. I have come to ask me put negative score so that everything I say.

I was hoping with curiosity and a certain desire to the premiere of the new film by Antonio Banderas as director. Their debut, "Crazy in Alabama" I think it is a good movie, interesting and very well directed so that the intention of flags to tell us a story about his childhood Malaga did presage an emotional film.Isn't that wait a masterpiece but yes a good film. After the first, in general not very positive reviews, I slightly rebajé my expectations. But what I did not expect under any circumstances is a brick of this caliber, a suckling pig, a real horror like that myself. One could speak for hours of what bad is the film but I will try to be brief and concise, something that the film is not.First and foremost if someone commits the imprudence of going to the cinema to see it, it is better to be notified of that in the first 20 minutes absolutely nothing happens. Anything. Allegedly poetic images, one after the other and little else. But when they begin to move things, and the story starts, is even worse because every situation is more ridiculous than the last.The characters are very poorly defined, do not make any sense, and it is really difficult to feel minimally identified by that bunch of morons whose behavior is not at all justified or explained. That Yes, all the give of philosophers think that now it is fashionable.What to say needless that actors can do nothing with these characters so I stay with the doubt to know if they are good or not. What I do is clear is that diction remains one of the outstanding Spanish film accounts.The film is such silly plot that came to head "Mulholland Drive" but with the difference that, even when it makes no sense, the Lynch film has magnetism, atmosphere, hooked and not boring. Flags fails the same and I'm not even sure that has tried it. In fact I have not clear what has tried to.Worse, in my opinion, the movie is no longer your script or performances or slow or your address. Worst of all is its pretentiousness, its intention to go deep and artistic. I have come to ask me put negative score so that everything I say. But as the soundtrack is not bad I decided to do so.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3794

Ana Belén Pacheco

La Búsqueda: El Diario Secreto

muchocine

My advice: If you enjoyed the first it is possible that you repeat this. If you are absolute fan of the toupee of Cage, forward, happens without calling. If you want to see good movies look to see that they throw in Conference Room 3, possibly better.

I have to admit that the first part of the film was cinematically pretty bad not is surprising that the thing does not improve in the second. The script that tries to be a little more elaborate than its predecessor is even more bizarre and nonsensical but for an adventure film the thing is not very important. That Yes, while you may doubt the ability to film both can not lie and say that it has not in the first part of a tape because when you go to see films of adventures the thing is simple, there is action, there is humor, there is a certain plot and you spend a nice time. The search I was a surprise from the hands of the Disney (as pirates of the Caribbean but in smaller proportions) who clearly had to be continued. Benjamin Franklin Gates and his father after the first "treasure hunt" have managed to make a name in the scene and full conference one of the spectators accuses his grandfather to be part of the plot to kill Lincoln. Of course, one may have a toupee but family it is not touched. Why the first art equipment (including the funny companion) launches the adventure to assemble the pieces to unmask the real murderers and step, and if it arises, find fantastic treasures. So give back to the world making stop in the capitals of Europe and in some historic landscape of USA. Nicolas Cage, Diane Kruger, Jon Voight and Justin Bartha repeat, adds Ed Harris as bad malísimo, Harvey Keitel loose and off is the poly Tracker and Helen Mirren is the tape which alma en pena in search of some brilliant point that never comes. Bruce Greenwood plays the President, again, and it seems that with a view to staying with a role in the next installment.The Ribbon is loose, really tightly follows the scheme of each film of Jerry Bruckheimer, track after track, persecution, action, shooting, simpleton humor, spectacular levels, any explosion, a formula has furthermore managed to get to the palomitero public in the Pocket. Obviously nothing seems real or realistic, is fanciful in excess and leaves you with a feeling of pride for being American, wait, I'm not American, what disgust!My advice: If you enjoyed the first it is possible that you repeat this. If you are absolute fan of the toupee of Cage, forward, happens without calling. If you want to see good movies look to see that they throw in Conference Room 3, possibly better. If you think that Cage always acts with the face of chard, the thing does not change this.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2121

Bruji

Arthur y los Minimoys

muchocine

Adaptation to the screen of a tale of four volumes, he wrote in his spare time, and which pays tribute to (or plagiarism) all accounts that are likely to be honored (or plagiarized).

The French director Luc Besson writes and produces this story of fantastic Court and good intentions, where the bombers are friendly mosquito and the long-range missiles, tomatazos. A film that has nothing to envy to the American productions in its execution and the outcome of which will be not revealed another thousand years! (from the minimoyco calendar). I am not I get accounts!. Luc Besson not only said, but it also boasted, that shot ten films, but ultimately announced to the French chain RTL this? according to my information, the number nine as director - is the last. The truth is that few things there that I add in the trajectory of the peculiar filmmaker, screenwriter and producer. And it is this man knows how to make all or, at least, has enough money to try it. Come on, that el capricho dizzy with the camera, write scripts without sense, heat the mood with surprising outbursts and teasing the viewer with subsequent unlimited boredom can give. Against what it presupposes, these parameters are unchanged in all of his films, which do not have more than ten minutes of interest. (León, the professional, either). A few licenses that can afford because, in addition, finances and distributes his own works (I am abstaining enclose them an adjective) at the international level. Perhaps, if his film dispenses of the spectacle that has made it famous in the lockers and cared a negligible detail called quality, you could be considered Alexander Korda of the 21st century. account legends about a taxi which is now in the fourth installment, will produce the last work of Jodie Foster as Director. who knows?.In any case, we are left not knowing whether or not the Minimoys is his latest film. If it were, it would be an excellent farewell. A film of perfectly executed, but it employs a cheater script of dubious originality, with possible autobiographical overtones.It's adaptation to the screen of a tale of four volumes, he wrote in his spare time, and which pays tribute to (or plagiarism) all accounts that are likely to be honored (or plagiarized) so far.To begin with, and even at the risk of being no need to comment that the intrigue of finding out what "Al otro lado" already her had a real writer of children's stories, Lewis Carroll, a hundred and forty years ago. We continue to reach the conclusion that "there are other worlds, but they are in this", and admit the existence of "small kind beings who are living with us", in fact, the tiny. will not yet, there is still more!.The initial approach of the script revolves around a problem of eviction, resulting from the imminent abandonment of a home that will fall into the hands of unscrupulous builders. To avoid this, the child protagonist has to resort to the search for a treasure. We are obviously counting the argument of the Goonies. A legendary story in which master Spielberg incorporates flat long linking the world of the sewers with the surface (the scene of the well of wishes), which is exactly what makes Besson, on numerous occasions, in this film.The creation of an adventure that takes place in the own garden of housing, since we already knew it for love miniature is not novel, I have shrunk to children, in which a drop of water causes a flood, or flowers are comfortable dwellings.Selenia - Bell is the daughter of a King good-natured (as all Kings of all the Disney Tales), a Princess of new generation, of those who know take care of themselves and are not afraid to deal with the danger. It is even possible to be friends with some heroin from Shrek. Of course, that alone can not release the magic sword, in the past called Excalibur. For that, it employs the protagonist, which, curiously, is called Arthur. His parents, incidentally, are a few irresponsible as the progenitors of Mathilda and the poor boy is always alone, as the child of the rescuers in pictures. The meeting of dance on a vinyl record, it becomes a hint of Pulp Fiction of Tarantino, (which already had honored at Antz), but soon opts for the paths of Robert Rodriguez, to finish with an unusual sentence: open until dawn. I not forget the stick insect addressing his followers, in a well traced scene of the Lord of the rings, the allusions to Jumanji, with an African tribe that nobody knows where it went or what does in Connecticut. I.e., that that "our story begins in the heart of Africa" is as false as to believe that there is no string to save the waterfall (the minimoy leads more than a thousand in the backpack). It is usual that recent years animated films contain "winks" adult film to be more attractive to parents, only that there are more than wink, nervous tics in Arthur and the Minimoys. Not to mention the Hydrophobia, the mansions built illegally, the problems with the IRS.Nevertheless, I'll be good, him I attach an approved by know mixing, skillfully, the innocence of the fantasy with reality, sometimes unpleasant and not always easy to hide from children.In summary, a film "terribly original", but well done; more than interesting, interested in not stop blinking to kids (by the rapid succession of images), and well-suited for a few dates in which you try to believe how beautiful it is to live!, our House looks like the cabin of the Marx Brothers, and there's always who can afford a breakfast at Tiffany? s (as it must be at the gate).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/377

Robgordon

Alatriste

muchocine

Anything worth caring both for this design, if you forget the most important thing; caring for your story and give it a minimal film interest. Slow and eternal. Ultimately, a waste of 24 million euros, to achieve well little.

Often sopor I meant the viewing of which was called to be the great savior of the Spanish film, "Alatriste" production.Also, modorra, numbness, heaviness, lethargy, boredom, it hastió or I tedio? as you want to call. And it was not something personal, judging by the views and faces of the rest of the spectators out of the projection.There is no doubt, what is that "Alatriste" is a blockbuster. One of the few who dare to make the Spanish cinema. And this time, view the formal invoice, we could think that finally our film had achieved what he had never done; come to Hollywood with a Ribbon of adventure and action, spared expenses, with an international protagonist and an ambitious production.Because as for production design is concerned, "Alatriste" has nothing to envy to the American blockbusters, or without having to cross the pond, to the French, which also take care with great success the visual aspect in their most expensive works.The Spanish 17TH century, is beautifully recreated in "Alatriste". Their scenarios, locations, his costume design, this Madrid of the Siglo de Oro, of capa y espada, with the valid of the Kings and monarchs themselves. This is the best "Alatriste" and the only thing that is a step forward for the Spanish film.But that is not enough. Anything worth caring so much for that design, dressing to the film with a plasticity characteristic of a painting by Velázquez, if you forget the most important thing; caring for your story and give it a minimal film interest. "Alatriste" is excellent in the formal, but simply null in the background, which ends up being a dramatic failure, a major disappointment and a sovereign boredom.The director of the event is Agustín Díaz Yanes, "Tano" for friends, a director who stayed in promise. Was pleasantly surprised with "Nobody will speak of us when we have died" but evidenced by serious doubts about his talent on the unclassifiable "without news of God" in which, the best was the Bob Dylan song that opened the initial titles.In "Alatriste", Díaz Yanes is unable to provide narrative coherence in the tape. It does more than wander. It presents sequences, characters and contexts and close them, not to open them again. He then does the same thing. And thus it is running time, unless we have received nothing in particular. There is an alarming lack of storyline. It gives the feeling of Yanes (director, and at the same time, screenwriter of the event) just wanted to do a 17TH century fresco and not to move Pérez Reverte stories to a cinematic context, which is what most are missing in this work. The viewer of "Alatriste" will wait for 2 hours and 20 minutes to display the action, arising the adventures, and all, is expected of an overproduction of this style. I'm still waiting.And now look at actors? that's another story. All them are great costumes, but only Javier camera as count Duke of Olivares and Juan Echanove as Quevedo, are able to take advantage of them. Yours, are the best interpretations of the tape. Something difficult to achieve in a movie in which your director strives to make you appear as soon as make you disappear.An important gibberish characters come together in "Alatriste". It is true that all belonged to that time. But? they were all needed?, perhaps adds something to the development of the story Fray Emilio Bocanegra? And it was necessary to make the poor Blanca Portillo rapase hair and play a man? Barely appears endos sequences. Eduardo Noriega? has someone said he is not good actor? What transmits not absolutely nothing? Does he painted something mildly momentous, his character, the count of Guadalmedina?And better nor speak of Ariadna Gil to which I have always considered "a deadpan concrete block".Antonio Dechent and Eduard Fernández, save their small roles. Pilar López de Ayala has two sentences. And Enrico Lo Verso, is the closest thing to a villain in this movie. Not to mention the romantic relationship between Iñigo Balboa and Angelica. Abrupt, nothing credible. Why is it so bad? It gives me the feeling that the moments in which both have fallen in love and have shared time together, have been left in the editing room. That if Diaz Yanes puts you two seconds of each of these mutilated sequences so you know that you among so much cut and swordsmen are the two enamoradizos pipiolos. Lamentable.Y on Viggo Mortensen, a good actor as well demonstrated in "A history of violence" and a magnetic hero's adventures ("Lord of the rings") is, in appearance, a perfect Diego Alatriste. "But its Spanish forced at times incomprehensible cancels all his good work in the composition of the character.""Alatriste" is a blockbuster without epic without adventures, with a multitude of unnecessary sequences, zero contribution to the plot development. With poorly treated characters. And few action scenes. Slow and eternal. Ultimately, a waste of 24 million euros, to achieve well little. Spanish overproduction is the worst of the American blockbusters light years.Much hype is being given to "Alatriste" (there are many people involved to share the cake) something that in the short term will be counterproductive for the Spanish film. Which boasted as a possible hope for our film, is not but another sign of the deep creative crisis facing our country. Frankly tape desilusionante. The nth disappointment of Spanish film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2981

Tito Chinchan

El fontanero, su mujer y otras cosas de meter

muchocine

Film S with women of truth, when the silicone was placed in joints and not her tits. To descojonar a time of laughter. I do not speak of sexual themes, that my girl scolds me then.

Well, today is a glorious day. Titus Chinchan will publish his first criticism of a porn movie, and this is historical. Certainly it is not the first thing I see, but yes to more I laughed. Although I have to say that I did not know that it was porn, but that he had put her, it is going to do. If I've seen things like the nun or Rotwailer, as I am not going to see this?The film is about a plumber who is in bed to his wife with another guy, which coincidentally is his best friend. Total, which is mosquea and will fit women of the friend that quickly make it. Total, this leads to a picha-coño - teta-mouth non-stop in the 75 minutes of film. At the end passes as the 2 sides of the bed, but well past, without half measures. I feel I have been the end, but it is to avoid that you say that you have only seen the beginning.Well, this movie is the cane. It has everything you can expect from a film. Nipples everywhere and insured laughs, nothing of special effects and varied scenarios. The script is sober and fits very well to the pre-established idea that you take by simply viewing the poster. No surprises or upsets, but retains the narrative tension very well until the final surprise. As the film sketches, I tell you a scene. The plumber is with a girl. Total, that you made a powder to the above without lowering the zipper of the monkey (an Iberian male is 100%). She tells him that he has left half (the stays to entire) total that makes him a cunningulis. He says that after the mantecao, ná de ná. She, neither short nor lazy, is going to the bidet and "Czech, Czech, Czech" leave it to eat soups in it. The Lord recula, but in the end accepted. But as it has become to go without removing the monkey, she takes a quick decision. Grab the plunger, so click on the floor and gets to gallop on it, which encourages the plumber to one afiladita Sable. Crazy.In short, movie S with women of truth, when the silicone was placed in joints and not her tits. To descojonar a time of laughter. I do not speak of sexual themes, that my girl scolds me then.Besitos.P.D: I was going to put a classification based on cocks of gold, but I do not want.Pd2: now, traspasamé, traspasaaaaaaameeeeeeeee!!!!!P.D.3: Public this because my girl has given the go-ahead to but I would not dare.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1135

Ramón Balcells

María Antonieta

muchocine

Marie Antoinette is quite improved, both in the aspect of the strength of the script, sometimes apparent lack of feelings behind the cameras. Nevertheless, it has an admirable production design and style with an exquisite taste.

After seeing the great Lost in translation, one could have very high hopes with the new draft of the daughter of Francis, Sofia Coppola. At least, I had them. As it turns out that his new project for her, the closure of the trilogy of the misunderstanding, is based not in the story of a young sisters and two individuals lost in Tokyo, but in the life of Marie Antoinette, which at the time was Queen France. This astonishing decision, according to her, is based on the portrait of a young misunderstood at the Court with a style of the Director. For me, is based on the portrait of a being misunderstood in a court that did not understand anyone and in excess of pastels, lace and flowers. But above all, Marie Antoinette presents a delicate scene (virtually perfect), some formidable performances, a beautiful photograph and music chosen with exquisite taste.The script might present a rhythm excessively slow and repetitive, but I will say what else can tell of the life of a teenager living on cakes and lace. So what is made to miss are deeper relations between the Court, political debates (appear, but very superficial)? In my opinion, I think that Coppola could have gotten a lot more advantage, not the girl, but all her surrounding, but not him he belonged. Okay, is entertaining and cool record, cakes, (tuned to the All Stars!) shoes and lace, but think that the Director of Lost in translation could have filled this void that is both noticeable in history. While it is true that the script is not bad, nor much less. I am thinking it may be a bit empty, but poorly structured is not. Despite its slow pace and some that another downturn is a totally innovative and captivating film. But this, I think that he owes more to his style which not in the script.Austrian cakes, flowers, dresses and rock and roll.Some criticize the style of Coppola saying that it is empty, posh and immoderate hijísima. But let's see! In his films, for me, what most influences is the style. So you enter or not enter. I went in Lost in translation, and I was amazed. His second feature was in the 21st century, i.e. that it was not a film of time. Marie Antoinette, obviously, yes it is. And one may wonder: how will its modernísmo reflected style in a film of time?. Very simple. The issue is to have good taste to add modern music in scenes of time and make you believe that society has not changed much. And for my succeeds. Moreover, can the film style is what attracts me most. Perhaps occasionally exceed (especially with show shoes and dresses) but is that really what this set of "animal" of the Court lived. Although I have to say that the best part is the music. Songs of New Order, The Cure and Gang of Four, and all of them are exceptional (highlighting Celebration of the first group). Although also introduces music of the 18th century, suppose that you to not load too staff. Best scene with modern music is undoubtedly that of the Ballo in Maschera, with a song by Siouxsie & the Banshees, totally incréible.He has accused Sofia Coppola do not portray the people (who at that time was playing poverty). I think that the retarta bit, like the Court and the political events, but also think the key scene of the film is that that Marie Antoinette takes his defeat over showing to the people, who intends to kill her. It is a superbly shot scene and that counts more than it seems, like the delicate and arriesgadísimo level of change of box (who has seen already will know what I mean). So, ultimately, I have to say that the film fails when it exceeds and on the other hand, when it summarizes an important event in a short sequence, is when it is most incredible.Another absolutely remarkable point is the sublime interpretation of Kirsten Dunst. His role, despite contain totally empty feelings, is portrayed with expertise and common sense. Certainly, the performance of this girl deserves some prize, although I doubt they give. Also appearances of Jason Swartzman and Judy Davis are wonderful (what aging is!), in a totally different but unique roles.In conclusion, it could be argued that Marie Antoinette is quite improved, both in the aspect of the strength of the script, sometimes apparent lack of feelings behind the cameras. Nevertheless, it has an admirable production design and style with an exquisite taste.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2350

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

The talent has given way to the monetary gluttony; appears at times, but does not produce the joy that we had with the other memorable 2 deliveries.

The miracle, is not did although neither was foreseeable that an epiphany of butterflies at the mouth of the stomach produce astonishment, which is the first command in the line of text of good cinema. Good film there was the first delivery: irreverence for adult smell, tenderness and good feelings for child membership and an excellent script which intended to snatch the throne of animation for Disney. Box office and critical confirmed the audacity. The Visual findings of yesteryear, the high level of the dialogues and nasty that deconstruction of traditional tales - who to Propp him had seemed a great audacity - does not appear in this third delivery almost anywhere. The "almost" allow Shrek the third's not horrific and leave some welcome: simply does not require much. The inventory of characters has grown, but all are predictable. The first two stories was subversion and irreverence, here is an outrage of burned gags that never bother (is true), but they produce the strange feeling that we are witnessing a blatant mental flatulence whose most manifest purpose is to gouge us Pocket without that, in return, provide us what nostalgia promised, i.e., intelligent eschatology, humorada critique, the happy encounter between adult - in this case, animated - film and the film child, so reviled, so become a commodity, and expendable and insignificant material for so long. It has struck me this wasted time, but I am not disappointed to not recommend. They centred two or three unforgettable scenes to justify the journey. I remember now a simply brilliant: ñoña melody to the Disney who soon is encabrita and hence, without appreciable fracture to the demonic screams of Robert Plant in one of their wild vocal epifanías. Perhaps it is there, in the formidable musical selection - Damian Rice to the Paul McCartney Wings - lies the still hectic charm of this prodigious period of summer sales.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1988

Rafa Ferrer

Cabeza de perro

muchocine

A tape Spanish more, with a curious air that sweetens but fails to sink, except those who have lived with a similar ailment.

This morning, while took me my coffee and my 2 donuts of rigour, and quarreled with a ceaseless headache (migraine perhaps) which leads accompany me during a good part of the day (perhaps victim of the hangover of illusion of the team of my loves), I was surprised myself seeing again, "7 vírgenes" emitted at that time on Canal +This tape I already talked at the time, but has been the presence of Juanjo crossbow which has given me walk to see this, another film, where the record of the same change is evident, and that no mistake, to crossbow we have seen him as "el bola" (the character made him famous) in all the films in which has participated after the tape of Achero Mañas. Me calls powerfully the attention than film Spanish without tits girls, is not Spanish film and that, after looong uncover years, yet still shows a libérrimo sinus on any tape "made in spain" self-respecting.I did not like anything the band sound, repetitive, heavy, insistent and boring and is reminded me in some way to those boxes of music or little insistent music that we see in some video games and that little, to say nothing, has to do with the development of the story.A good staff accompanied by many unknown faces, only dressed with Alex or television?Doherty and the splendid Manuel Alexandre, complete the distribution of the tape.With external shot in the center of Madrid and places that I frequent quite often, for example, the Summit of the car scene is shot a few meters from the House of my in-laws.A small detail has anyone seen the CGI we have cast? Too bad it note so that it is a mere special effect, since it had seemed rather surprising to me.While the tape found me entertaining and quite funny; for what to translate certain likelihood a disease that I have suffered for a quarter of my life (Yes, I've been epileptic), sometimes they are going the pot to the happy issue of the protagonist, because while it is true that one feels a tremendous sense of fear and ridiculous after a crisis if it has done something inadequateleaving the disease you expire is a mistake, something that I learned when with 11 years I was diagnosed with the disease is namely to control and to never leave that outside it that guide my life now for 2 years that I finished my treatment, I still think the epilepsy as a fellow traveller, somewhat heavy, but it must never ruin your life.Forgive me for a few moments he has spoken of something that had to be dealt with and who know perfectly well that nobody cares a damn, but as always, and for which I read regularly is a good way to cure my neuro and frighten my demons.A tape Spanish more, with a curious air that sweetens but fails to sink, except those who have lived with a similar ailment.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3020

Iñaki Bilbao

Mataharis

muchocine

Good film of Icíar Bollaín, both from the formal point of view and of substance. A very nice movie liked very much to the public.

Good film of Icíar Bollaín, both from the formal point of view and of substance.Bollaín, which has special eye to show the human qualities of the ordinary mortals, known on this occasion take the story in a very interesting way (impeccable magnificent music of Lucio Godoy), resulting in addition, very entertaining as it did in its superb "Te doy mis ojos".This is less dramatic, or at least it has less violent dyes, but also human feelings come into continuous conflict with ethical and/or moral aspects that can make explode into a thousand pieces harmony, love, respect and trust between the beloved people.Thanks to a splendid script where the three main stories are complemented by other, seemingly more light, but just as substantial, the film tastes as a small delicacy, leaving therefore a very good taste. Interlinked different stories that show attractive form States the love of a couple passes along the years: the budding infatuation, the first glimpses of crisis and the death of love, dam of the tedium and empty coexistence of every day with nothing to say.Great interpretations, where stands once more Antonio de la Torre, this time in a small paper with a different log of what you were seeing it lately, and Nuria González. The scenes between them are the best of a movie with splendid and simple dialogues, exists an endearing humanity in the stories that show the best of humans and also, if not the worst, yes more grey and sad.A very nice movie liked very much to the public, having loud applause.The press conference, with the Director and Diego Martín, María Vázquez, Nuria González, Najwa Nimri (beautiful and with a dress that cut the hiccups), and Tristán Ulloa, had no waste, showing a Icíar Bollaín, very safe road undertaken behind the camera. We wish you every success, as well as the film festival. Although there are still many films by compete. We will see.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2737

Luis Zueco

Caótica Ana

muchocine

It is worth going to see it because it is an air of freshness that film, and not only Spanish, urgently needed. It also proposes a story interesting and original, with a beautiful soundtrack and the special ambience that give the tables.

Chaotic Ana is without doubt the best Spanish film of the year, and Julio Medem one of the best Spanish directors. Does this post should be entitled "in defense of Caótica Ana", because the number of attacks, is incomprehensible criticism destructive, insults,? that is treated in this film.From the point of view strictly film, anyone who says that this film is not special, different, ambitious and courageous, it is not much understanding of cinema. It is a complicated film, welcome to the cinema of truth, which is done from the heart, from what one feels and wants to express. It is chaotic, please read the title. That the end is not the most successful, agree, is that if he had also succeeded in adequately finish the film, we would be talking about a masterpiece. I think that you can forgive you the end for the hour and a half of freshness, feelings, emotions, desire to live, etc that offers us the tape. I have come to read critical that most highlights of the film is that the protagonist, that makes a simply incredible interpretation is passed throughout the film naked. The first thing is that it is a lie, and the second thing is that if it still surprises us, and furthermore does not bother to see a nude in the film, it is that we have made very little progress in the last 60 years. I also read that it is the worst tribute could do to his sister (the film is named after she died when heading to make a presentation), who believed the people what to say as it should honor a brother to his sister, who would know her better than him and who cares. Finally I also read that the protagonist is simply a bleary-eyed hippie, until it was a spice of Heidi who lives in a cave with his grandfather. What happens is that there are people that bothers them that currently there are people with principles, with different ways of looking at life, people who want a different world.The film is worth going to see it because it is an air of freshness that film, and not only Spanish, urgently needed. It also proposes a story interesting and original, with a beautiful soundtrack and the special ambience that give the tables. But you cannot finish it properly, which can forgive.