Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/517

Alberto Concepción

Gracias por fumar

muchocine

Despite err on the side of some irregularity, 'Thank you for smoking' satire works... and fun

Tobacco has always had great importance in the world of cinema: classical actors who not stopped smoking on the big screen, coming to turn into something 'sexy', consideration that reaches our days are numerous. 'Thank you for smoking' reflects not only the film power levels and social customs which can produce films, but it also delves into one of the most discussed by Western societies fear in recent years: smoking or non smoking, that is the question. Since some time ago, tobacco companies have suffered a major offensive by the health authorities, as well as the Government: he began with the withdrawal of advertising in various media, and has been reached (for now) be prohibited smoking in any public place. There are views of all types, but in a State of law, someone has to defend the interests of tobacco companies, and that is the work of Nick Naylor, played by a good Aaron Eckhart. The film not only emphasizes this, but it deals with problems of all kinds, such as relatives, but above all, labour: director, over and over again, insists make us see that the greatest concern of people is to pay their mortgages, with employment that is, and with greater or lesser involvement in the daily life of each. Perhaps this is the message of this satirical film, which, far from being a genius, not at odds in no time, and ends up leaving a good taste.The plot is based on an original and interesting premise: you have several ingenious points and are poured moderately vicious criticism, both to society as the Administration, world emrpesarial, and even to the film. As the film develops, there are a number of small ups and downs, which is rather due to too long sequences or the repetition of the same arguments. However, this should not remove merits to Jason Reitman, who besides directing, adapted the screenplay from the novel (by Christopher Bickley) of the same name which is based the film on the other hand, is his first work for the big screen, after having triumphed with several short films.Aaron Eckhart comfortably meets his work: adds appeal and mischief to his character, which appears on the other hand, made to suit. The rest of the cast performed a good job, with correct Maria Bello, Robert Duvall and William H. Marcy consigned to a background, like most of the rest of performers, given the absolute role of Eckhart.Probablemente could have given more than itself, but in these times, with achieving that flow, already is a merit. Therefore, and in spite of err on the side of some irregularity, the satire of 'Thank you for smoking' funciona.y fun.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/800

Dragon negro

Dead or alive

muchocine

The movie is simple, stupid jokes, the relationships between the characters superfluous, struggles past thread and exaggerated, the script is predictable, but you do not see as well that I've been seeing this movie.

DOA, Dead or Alive, is a wrestling tournament where participate the best in their specialty and that takes place in a complex on an island. There they were invited to participate our protagonists, Christie, a thief were chased by the police, Tina, an expert in wrestling with a rather peculiar father, Kasumi, a princess who leaves his Kingdom in search of his brother, and Helena, daughter of the late Organizer and that attempted to show what it is worth. Tournaments randomly facing the opponents and any time and stage is good for a fight. But this year the tournament is not clear water and its current organizer has hidden intentions. And already, there is no longer just it nothing more than chicha in this film, or what expected, great philosophical conversations, characters that evolve with the plot, social criticism, interpretations of Oscar. Will not find anything like that here, just a plot and a simple script and even senseless times, spectacular fights, some more successful than others, and girls in bikini, and already is, well, not, and volleyball, of course, not me forget volleyball in a bikini.Fans of the game will have their tribute in the early fighting, with the positions taken at the end of each one and even energy level markers. The villain is not Eric Roberts, which makes time not seen in the film and actor in series B and everything that throw you it that should leave be more. The rest are grips guys and girls who spend half of the tape in a bikini and the other half with tight clothing.They are three scenes where displayed their skills and their bodies, bikini and underwear, clear already from the outset DOA leaves clear of that is going to go, the presentation of the protagonists. The film does not leave a moment of respite, there are fights either or there are showcasing bodies in bikini, or both. There are zillions blows, espadazos, and much violence, but at no time we will see a drop of blood or any wound, no face marked, like great aunt in a bikini but little else, a real shame.The main virtue of the film, and here lies its charm (and not in the girls in bikini) is that you are not taken seriously at any time, knows that they cannot offer much more than what they offer and are not intended to anything else than be pure entertainment last thread. I'm already sick of shit movies ranging from serious and profound film when they are not. Here at least not they stubbornly give a depth to the film and a background when it is not, nor desire. They are playing their cards and play them well, fights and aunts in bikini and point.The movie is simple, stupid jokes, relations between the characters superfluous, struggles past thread and exaggerated, the motivations of the characters little defined, the script is predictable and often inconsistent, but you do not see what good that I've been seeing this movie. By the way, did I say since there aunts in bikini all the time?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3315

Francisco Bellón

Oviedo Express

muchocine

Oviedo Express is one of the cooler movies of Spanish film of 2007, that combines a number of elements which seemed to have been lost, such as magical realism and Surrealism itself

Spanish film this year has undergone major and serious ups and downs. He began so excellent earlier this year, something unusual, but shortly afterwards however suffered a downturn in quality than not recovered until after the summer. It is in these months, with premieres of films like Mataharis, 13 roses or seven French billiard tables, when Spanish film greatly improves.Oviedo Express certainly is another title to be considered in such recovery, and is that Gonzalo Suárez signing a great movie. He is that of a film of difficult rating or description, being perhaps the right one, being also the most ambiguous of comedy-drama. The argument is simple, the arrival to Oviedo from a large theatrical company to represent La Regenta is a small revolution in the city. Oviedo Express has a certain air of manners comedy, as well as a tone of magical realism reminiscent of Manuel Gutiérrez Aragón, and even has totally surreal touches. Despite this, it is a fresh and original, proposal in which Gonzalo Suárez mixed with great skill antagonistic elements. The vision that Gonzalo Suárez moves the Viewer is a vision distorted by the retranca, sarcasm and irony in which no one is spared. Having said that, the film reaches its moments of greatest genius when it focuses on the theatrical company and its components. Tributes to Sidney Lumet and Billy Wilder, especially that of this, are master. The interpretations are all soberbias (including the Aitana Sánchez-Gijón), although it is impossible to not highlight of that great actor named Carmelo Gómez. Oviedo Express is one of the cooler movies of Spanish film of 2007, that combines a number of elements which seemed to have been lost, such as magical realism and Surrealism itself. It offers the Viewer, as well as spend a fun time, a vision steeped in irony of the theatre, culture, politics and social life of a small town.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2782

Tito Chinchan

El mito de Bourne

muchocine

Second installment of our friend Bourne, who has to travel the world to avenge a had, in addition to escape from his past that is increasingly closer. Lots of action and an argument solid enough to make us an entertaining two hours.

Well, nothing, the case becomes myth and the second part we have here. As you can see, the director has changed (anda that apellidar green grass has balls) and has also changed the lead actress for reasons unknown. I preferred the previous one (in the physical plane, I mean).The film is about a secret agent who has lost memory, and following a withdrawal of 2 years in the ass of the world, have to deal with a had that even colea. On the other hand, he has been involved in a crime he did not commit, so average CIA pursues him like crazy.The second part of Mr Bourne has much more action, which counteracts the perfection with the loss of intrigue. I.e., if we know that he has lost the memory and Intuit who is, because that is lost. But it has been known to give a dose of great action and special effects to make the two-hour bearable. To highlight the final persecution, which is tremendous.In short, second installment of our friend Bourne, who has to travel the world to avenge a had, in addition to escape from his past that is increasingly closer. Lots of action and an argument solid enough to make us an entertaining two hours.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1954

Daniel Galindo

Mi hijo

muchocine

Public, critics and jury festivalero often go through different paths. Irrefutable proof of this is found in the winning the Golden shell at San Sebastian 2006 tape.

By the time that has been slow to see the light, it feels that distributors were afraid to teach us this claustrophobic and bitter story about the sense of maternal possession. Without going into plot reiterations, sanity has prevailed and in the end has come to our screens with little hype that Yes, this funny portrait of despair and selfishness, fed by the excess of authority, for which his main actress won also the silver shell at the San Sebastian festival.A mother's love can be unbearable for the suffering. Behind this claim there is no second that worth, but a sentence that feeds the essence of a short but intense and somewhat predictable feature film about the maternal Authority carried to extremes. Psychological violence is less tangible than Physics: no bruises, no visible damage to the naked eye, but who endures carries with it their traumatizing brands of for life. From this premise, Martial Fougeron describes a myriad of sour situations outlined in dry and austere but with realization way and, at times, excessive point of reiteration that could have led to his downfall.But there she was to sustain this descent to the abyss: few actresses convince me both as a Frenchwoman Nathalie Baye. I have not ignored any title starring her since I met her flirting in bed with Sergi López and verborréica lost in A private relationship. In this decade? she does in the gap much longer - I've seen as Matthieu, Venus, beauty salon, the flower of evil? more or less interesting films, jumbles and wonders, but all with one common denominator: which was François Truffaut Muse always was splendid. The same is true here, where in addition to being the main attraction, acts as a Savior of a tape that could well have been mitigated and neither had suffered a great deal.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/91

Iñigo

Transamerica

muchocine

Felicity Huffman is good, but nothing so great as some they cacarean

It is interesting to note how even the cinema itself is torn between different pseudo-oleadas converted into temporary fashion. It is enough that you one the first stone lance so the screen becomes a massive stone-throwing. "Like everything else in this world, it has its pros and cons.""Transamerica" plays a bit with all these factors surrounding supposedly sudden, innovative, bold and groundbreaking ideas. But as what prima in the film quality are other factors. get a little malparada. Firstly, those who think that the film is terribly original, only, about the issue of a transsexual, are very wrong. It is not even the real background of the film.What is really appreciated is the boldness and the self-assurance with which touches a theme so (possibly) controversial and contentious. But that is a double-edged weapon. What at first is a species of road-movie to use (but absolutely with all factors seen and hackneyed) with tone comedian true dramatic background, degenerates into a substitute for comedieta certainly pathetic family mess, and concludes, obviously as a drama sprinkled with small comic elements to entertain the Viewer.A so orderly progression as obvious and predictable. The problem is that it is so simple and topical, drama hundreds of times seen in film, you need a fun mask to do so somewhat endearing. And that mask is precisely that avoids that the story is told with the necessary grip to enable us to the Stanley/Sabrina skin with all the seriousness that requires.As I said, the self-assurance with which us speaks of a difficult subject for many is a plus, and really, it may be so if you are simply looking for fun in the cinema. But seeing his little originality, it is difficult to reach the film more than a passenger entertainment.We have all the ingredients of the comic road movies. The frustration of a parent to discover the existence of a child, until today, unknown. The coincidences which obviously lead to both match and to know each other. The journey undertaken, more that a trip is a clear McGuffin for a future redemption and a rediscovery of both.A trip more spiritual than physical, a journey that, much as Stanley/Sabrina search the element that will definitely become the woman that has always wanted to be, the only thing that will really look for is the acceptance and the meeting with his son. The history of redemption is in essence, does that flood the viewer in a continuous feeling of "déjà vu". The unspeakable secrets that are discovered throughout the trip, the traumas of childhood revive by the intolerance experienced against a sexual preference (or psychological, will not put me to analyze it) atypical, both in the family environment and the social environment. Fear of rejection and replacement of a son which was not given all the love required by its condition of transsexual (here is the theme that comes to us, but any other reason or condition is valid and applicable).A cluster of evidence that expensive too much the quality and originality of the final product.Because no, no mistake. Which tell us the story of a transsexual does not change anything. If a drug addict, a lost son, a coward to be home because everything is complicated, or a perpetrator, surely the film not reached such levels of public interest. It would pass unnoticed, because that really is what deserves.History is always. The only thing that changes is the sexual preference of its protagonist. But not. We must accept that it is the story of a transsexual and that is why there will be uproar. And unfair criticism. These are things that happen. If for this simple reason we have to brand peliculón, forgetting his true quality and making more case to the uproar it causes. go I no me up on that bandwagon.Felicity Huffman is also good, but nothing so great as a certain cacarean to nominate it or announce it trumpeted. Tad sobreactuada perhaps. For this reason, in short, it is an interesting work only as portrait of a transsexual and frustrations, fears and prejudices of their environment.While the story and its formal self-assurance are numbered in a tone so humorous that, sometimes, is a burden which prevents us posicionemos properly in the complicated skin of the character. the correct description is sufficient so that we come to understand the message that tries to send. Addition, it must be admitted that innocence, simplicity and lack of pretensions of grandeur with which the story is told is a fact in their favor. It follows the classical aura of tranquility of purely "independent" films that make presence, from time to time, in billboard and arriving to become something endearing.But let us not deceive ourselves. You can upload any integer, but never become a great movie. It is so topical, repetitive and obvious that it does not bring anything new. The only thing that changes is the choice of the protagonist, a little valid change to raise the quality of a film that has little to offer. It entertains, amuses and little else. We are not at the level of "Brokeback Mountain" film (allow me the comparison by the rapprochement between topics and to avoid a controversy that would be unfounded, incoherent and stupid).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3722

JLO

Blade II

muchocine

Entertaining, with some interesting back of script to not be so obvious, good topics tecnos/hip-hop, finally... a fun guaranteed for lovers of fights and weapons. Long leather, much blood and cinema itself, are talking about another day...

Comics in celluloid and know that it is a negoción. After the sagas of Batman, Spiderman, Superman and X-Men, also Blade noted which have sequels, being the Hunter day another creation of the master writer Stan Lee, producer and capo total of the influential Marvel Comics (X-Men, Daredevil, Hulk, Spiderman, etc). Blade in addition to being one of the few heroes of black comic, lacks the "weakness" required of the Marvel characters that makes these interesting. His invulnerability and omnipresence more emparientan it to a Terminator or Rambo as the romantic Dracula also have points in common. With Blade one knows in advance that beyond some that another passenger danger, not going to go so wrong. Oriented towards the public of video games, the film appears to be built to simulating levels of these where as difficulties are dodging, are added rivals and armament. In this second part Blade (Wesley Snipes) is ally of his enemies to together to try to defeat the Reapers, a new breed of Super vampires trying to destroy both humans and sucks them bloods common, having to stop their leader Jared Nomak (villain achieved good) creator of these nearly immortal beings. Many good action scenes with videoclipero and special effects worthy of a blockbuster of its kind pace. For those who saw the first there will be many new features except a more meticulous aesthetic and an address from the Toro with more pace and craft, which raises the level of its predecessor. Del Toro already play in the major leagues and loves this fantasy genre (Hellboy, El laberinto del fauno). As for Wesley Snipes, is his best character of action since Simon Phoenix of the demolition - including brings some tics than that - but also giving you plenty of room for the brightness to the not to deal him a single gesture, being sentenced to use lenses black 90% of the film and with a huge leather coat. That Yes: know that it looks a good physical condition and a good haircut. Entertaining, with some interesting back of script to not be so obvious, good topics tecnos/hip-hop, finally. a fun guaranteed for lovers of fights and weapons. Long leather, much blood and cinema itself, are talking about another day.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3588

Bruji

Rec

muchocine

Dangerous mixture between genres in which the technique, which refines an already existing idea, puts to the formality of a screenplay based on flimsy premises of easy destruction. Pathetic misleading terror built based on Dogma and blackouts of light.

Who do not afraid to be locked up in a building, without the possibility of contact with the outside and faced a real threat as incomprehensible? To me, certainly much. Who not overwhelms you receive a history through a television camera which filmed shocking figures with night vision? Then there is the only secret of the overwhelming success of [REC]. A unusual movie that works more like "pasaje del terror" than as conventional tape, and only in their last minutes. In these, under the banner of "Let's go fear", light blackouts occur, camera movements are still more sea, limited depth of field becomes non-existent sound losses are frequent, - not always justified - hysteria reaches heights that rub the tachycardia, laughable serenity disappears and emerges a successful game of shadows and lights. But the problem of [REC] is that this part - certainly brilliant - don't fit inside all that it contains. To reach this situation and believe it, the viewer will need to make a superhuman effort to ignore a host of unforeseen and impermissible absurdities that make up the script. Here is that everything suggests that it was designed to be sold to the North American industry. There is more than usual that the police always come late and that the Government systematically, endangers the lives of their citizens, giving way to individual heroic interventions. Even in stories based on real events, makes clear a co-ordination and confusion that alarmed. But, all that is happening in this country. Here can be activated a terrorism unilaterally Protocol, in which the health authorities act under its own discretion without the knowledge of the rest of the bodies that make up the security of the State? It would have been wiser to omit the place in which unfolds the action, since the improbability of the answers is approaching science fiction more astonishing, in which forced isolation reaches communication systems and mobile phones lose coverage. Look at how you look at it, is like that old joke: "you want what that caught me by the bull". This coarse blend of genres always was more dangerous than rabid dogs transmitting lethal virus through saliva. But not content with creating an unlikely situation even for those who we believed us Resident Evil or 28 days after, the writers allowed the lujazo insert an episode of "Here no hay quien viva", in which a group of neighbors "terrified" (and no shortage of reasons to be so), cares more than leaving well combed before the House, and to criticize the feeding habits of the Lord who lives in the fourth right, that of his own integrity and survival. The incredible touches the hair tomadura while experts speak of "scathing critique of intercultural problems", while performances and direction of actors leave a lot to be desired. The beginning of this mess is found in a chilling "Footage", omen of nightmares flashing. Later, the absence of credits seems to indicate that managers might be "discredited" in this project of Blair shot with camera on his shoulder, without music, with impossible picture taken in conditions of very low intensity of light, in a "here and now" without temporary or space jumps. If not for points 6 and 8, the appearance of weapons and the explicit exclusion of "genre films" (that someone tell me a single movie that does not belong to none), we would be faced with a "Dogma film"; that, logically, we overlooked the rest of the Decalogue 95, that that neither its own founders met. Said "God" that "is a pleasure to direct and write is a roll". Perhaps that is why the screenplays are more worthy of praise than the own techniques of filming. In any case, the latter should never prevail over the former. It is the case, in addition, Jaume Balagueró (one of my major weaknesses) adopted with outstanding in both subjects. The nameless is, without a doubt, the best horror film lapped in this country. Scripts of stories such as fragile or Darkness, - so good times have made us move to lovers of the genre-, above all American employers to become the future of cinema that we want to see. The conception of [REC], frankly, disappointed. All of which leads to the belief that the only thing scary in this film are kilometric queues that have to be overcome in albaceteños theaters, to fall on one side of the row two and eighty-five minutes of camera shoulder support. Paul, recorded all this, by your mother!.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4103

Javier G. Pasamón

Buenas noches y buena suerte

muchocine

A film which invites reflection and that manages to give a lesson in ethics, commitment and cinematography fully rewarding, erected as a necessary document and required viewing. An ode to freedom of expression.

After a few initial minutes of the film where several semimudas scenes (with only sound and background music), serving as a choral presentation of the characters confront us and reminds us of the beginning of Cimino films as "The Hunter" or more loosely to "Schindler's list" of Spielberg, we can predict that the film will formally be impeccable, and this is confirmed during the rest of the footage.Many will qualify the work of Clooney as tedious or a simple pain in the ass, with a theme last historic surroundings and current importance, and it has deficiencies of rather outstanding pace, but nothing further from the truth. The film has a brutal narrative force and ethical not only exemplary but necessary and entirely valid message even today because the visual manipulation and cheap partisanship still exist, the politics of fear is still alive in many parts of the world (especially United States) and promotes and recalls the journalism, courageous and committed to society and its problems.Leaving aside the plot and narrative, issues that are largely valuable, visual and technical treatment of the tape is masterful but difficult to assess by many people, that it's a film of a formality based on minimalism and the correction. Enviadable is as Clooney tells this story, its resources to give dynamism or tension to a scene, the because of the narrative use of according to which levels or the beautiful setting worthy of a true master.Remarkable are the use of lenses in this film with a tremendously clever focal game, the flat sequence to provide realism and breadth to the scenes, so measured frames, scenes with depth of field and exceptional use of show a large amount of information in a scene and same framing, or movements so subtle and almost immeasurable camera sometimes which are not free or much less.The silent or semimudas scenes are a display of address, see for example the scene that we lose the image of the replica of Senator McCarthy to the show which aired 3 weeks before inculpando it, in which the character played by Frank Langella moves between shadows by the firm while not let hear the conversation of McCarthy, a representation of the fear of the possible reprisals Government or the fall of a television or medium by a committed risk. Clooney used silence or with only background music scenes to extol a moment or a person. Sometimes silence says more than words and here is an example. Also, the use of characters in off is something very right and splendid in the film by filmmaker.The superb photography Robert Elswit manages to transport us visually to the 1950s, helped by a minimalist music that complements perfectly beautiful and well-kept images. A fascinating lighting work and received a nomination to the oscar merecidísima in its respective section."The performances are very convincing, but highlighted one above the other is excellent and hit actor David Strathairn, which makes a marvelous reproduction of his character, the man who planted face McCarthy himself together with his team of the CBS, Edward R. Murrow.""Good night, and good luck", is a film whose tremendous quality is possible that it is difficult to detect by a vast majority of spectators because the subtlety of its details lies the greatness of the work of Clooney, as presents to the characters, as it uses the contrapicados to enlarge the figure major news and popular Murrow, as it presents the important moments with silencesas usa actors or as light eyes opens field to the image among other things. A director who already excelled in his brilliant but somewhat irregular Opera prima "Confessions of a dangerous mind" and here reaffirms her undeniable talent both visual and cultural. A film that portrays fantastically well an era of political repression, lack of freedom of expression scandalous and the struggle for a better future.The film is an ode to freedom of expression, we are told that the fight against injustices will always be present and although not achieved the desired objectives or perhaps miss the illusion, should not be left that commitment in the struggle, in this case speaks to us of the fight using the power of the word and its importance in our society.A film which invites reflection and that manages to give an educational lesson in ethics, commitment and totally rewarding cinematography, but above all, a necessary film and compulsory viewing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1085

Alberto Concepción

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

Eastwood is halfway between the masterpiece that has tried to shoot and the message

There is something in the films Eastwood to me resulta.pesado. Has happened to me with the last three: 'Mystic River' is a good movie, but I think that it is overrated; 'Million Dollar Baby' has begun to realize that smell of torpor and pretension: a duo something strange, but it has been confirmed in 'Flags of our fathers': a film made to conscience, knowing that it would be seen with magnifying glass, that would be with the complicity of much of the criticism and the public. and that has resulted a more complex film than it might seem, but also easier at the same time. And something heavy, Yes.No, I do not think that it is a contradiction: Eastwood is a large in this film. And 'Flags of our fathers' is a good movie. But their cassettes are always double-edged: the sins of the past, the importance of the future, euthanasia, and now manipulation. The American filmmaker does not stop criticizing absolutely the essential aspect of the film, perhaps for fear of indirect censorship of American society. I still do not know. But everything leads me to believe that Eastwood is halfway between the masterpiece that has tried to shoot and the message.Flags of our fathers is typical and atypical elements. Knowing that it was a battle of World War II, no one could expect less than an impressive landing on the island of Iwo Jima. Masterful, almost to the height of the Normandy in 'Saving private Ryan'. However, it is disadvantaged by the continuous flashbacks, that make the pace of the film can be somewhat irregular. The idea itself is understood, but perhaps they should not be so long or so apart.But since that I have brought to light the greatest war film of the last decade, there is something that do should be noted Eastwood: the story is more interesting than Spielberg (producer also in 'Flags of our fathers'). And what about the cast? Ryan Philippe plays, like the rest. There is no performance greatly highlighted, although to be honest, the tape is not made for the showcasing of its actors.Once again, Eastwood will take the cat to the water. Although well could have been reduced its footage, that rather than extensive becomes weary, 'Flags of our fathers' is a film that will not hardly, like. And this is already quite say.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1224

Yojimbo

Los Borgia

muchocine

The Borgia is a television product badly adapted to the cinema.

In the battle of labyrinth against the Borgia, Telecinco Antena 3 against, I have seen the quality of the second Boxer. And the truth, did not lack two hours and fourth film to verify the boredom of the new movie of Antonio Hernández. the truth, I hope that in the city without limits was not a cluster of large coincidences, because an overproduction of this caliber could not have been a "consecration" for a director. However Los Borgia is a television product badly adapted to the cinema.Although the pomposity of the sets follow telling us that the artistic Bill almost always goes well, dialogues and mounting not help at all to create an epic product, as it should have been.To begin with the "shocking" aspects, Sergio Peris Mencheta, which has a serious dilemma between his appearance of pimp with his diction at times incomprehensible at times defined by some almost comic screams; María Valverde, which may be all the "revelation" that they want, but which has been a terrible choice for portraying a woman with alleged character; dialogues, totally corny and badly interpreted. By many "who are you?" to write, you can say as if you were at the Academy of A step forward. Well, and as a final point against, the duration and rhythm. Obviously, if we are talking about a television product, digestion must be faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacil, which the characters have to explain absolutely everything (associated with the above dialogues) and everything has to be a little subtle.But things are welcome to see in this film is the talent of Lluis Homar, the mastery of Ángel Illarramendi and good to make Javier salmon. But of course they are not virtues that make me recommend seeing this movie. I am sorry.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1783

Jose Contreras

La cosecha

muchocine

Theology is an inexhaustible treasure of narrative skeletons for authors without imagination.

I don't know that critic said that new works are not invented from scratch, are bad rereadings of old. There is who manosea predecessors because he believes that you can improve them. For example "The harvest" is the re-reading of a spectator who was wanting to ship with the long-eared child makes of Demian in "The prophecy". This spine could explain average film. The end does not. The end belongs to fashion "poker" cinema of today, which is to get a letter from the manga that gives back to what he believed, women of the Mayor is not his wife, is a transvestite, the town is not a town, it is painted. However, with such surprise. A test to distinguish when tells you the story of an intelligent director and the tells you a fool as the protagonist discovers the truth. The truth can come from the hand of a scientist with white mane (the fast way) of a dying, a gossip, a computer, a secret that nobody should know (this tends to be the most reliable). The intelligent protagonists filter what you hear, discuss, refuse to believe. The director of "The harvest" has chosen a short cut shorter than the scientist's White mane: chose the mounting table. I still don't know if congratulations on the nose that gives her or tell you that it will do gargle. It has no waste, the protagonist learns the truth about the story because the editor puts forward the sequence of events as they occurred. Nobody talks, nobody explains, the scenes and we know that this was the case.The protagonist is a University professor who studies miracles to give a scientific explanation. It had been a missionary in Africa, but a tragedy made him renounce his faith. Now they call it a village, Haven, where a few Paranormal phenomena suggest that a girl is the incarnation of the devil. The havenenses, or haveneños, I do not know the patronym, experiencing one by one the ten plagues bíbilicas. The list of the ten plagues is as undependable as the seven deadly sins, or the four evangelists. Theology is an inexhaustible treasure of narrative skeletons for authors without imagination. Aware or not of the headache that means its proposal, the authors have put everything on their side so that at least it is not indifferent. Haven is the place where the battle between good and evil is fought. It is there where he is decided if the demon is going to dominate the world and therefore we are going to climb still more receipt of the phone, or if Hillary Swank is going to save us from having to wait in line in the window of the Bank. I wonder why the demon chooses forms so rare in movies when one is found in each corner with paseo clothing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3732

Tito Chinchan

Calle Mayor

muchocine

Manners film about the Spain of mid-20th century, where a group of friends thresh us the past miseries. Unless you're a scholar of film or born in that time do not recommend seeing her. It is not bad, simply outdated.

Director: Juan Antonio Bardem. duration: 80 minutilla.Release date: 5 December 1956 Barcelona Windsor, on January 7, 1957 Madrid Gran Via.Espectadores: 6,207 human beings.At the end of the film, in which the medium Zucchini slept in the third frame in black and white, I reminded my father with nostalgia. In particular those trips by car, laden with tapes of Eugenio and the great Marianico the short. And it is there to much like a father to not strangle him after four hours of "Know that than diú.". I remembered just a joke Marianico, saying that modern music groups complete the songs as if they were no forces, and the orchestras before ended with a chim pum (hear laughter from the audience). Because this film ends like, when most interesting seems the thing, it ends. It seems that some scene, lack you even.The film is about the life of a type which has a few chums of bar and House of whores. Involved, as well as to the interests mentioned above, to make jokes to people (such as carrying a coffin to one who nearly died of fright). As sympathetic bromazo in a depressed and sexist society which was the Spanish in 55, they decide to a girl that is going to be drier than the mojama to his 35 years without marrying, do believe that one of them we want to marry with her. Step film shows us the sad thing that was Spain from the middle of the century, at least in the medium-sized populations.I'm not critical of put me in these pools, but it is that this express recommendation of my mother-in-law me bored to the point of not sleep me by not having to return to see another day. And it is that over the years ago that certain films are not for everyone. I.e., the film will be a marvel, a cruel portrait of a vile and sexist society, where the ruindad and the lack of morality leads people to unusual extremes. But vista is now a very large suckling pig. The dialogues are not understood, fewer situations, and women now have children with more than 35 and nobody excoriated them for that reason. On the positive side, it is very curious to see small details, such as the plates they used, how cooked, the eternal raincoats and tie for men, etc. Much better than the "Cuentamé".In short, costumbrista film about the Spain of mid-20th century, where a group of friends thresh us the past miseries. Unless you're a scholar of cinema, was born in that time, or scholar of the subject, I recommend not seeing her. It is not bad, simply outdated.Besitos.P.D: Recalling another joke, now of Gila, the joke that you want to do would be as "Mabeis killed a child, but what I laughed" or "Look, if you don't put up a better joke going on the people" after booting an arm to one.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3277

Francisco Bellón

The invasion

muchocine

Invasion is practically a disguised, free and totally unnecessary remake. And as a thriller, fails miserably in its first precept, the scheming and keep in suspense to the Viewer.

There are literary works for which the film feels a special weakness, and they are transferred to the big screen on a regular basis by the various cinemas worldwide. But it is striking how the case of the novel by Jack Finney La invasion of the thieves of bodies, which in just fifty years has seen four adaptations to each person more distinct.For anyone to devote his life to the film, whether technical, directors or actors, it seems that one of your goals is the reach Hollywood, the Mecca of the seventh art. It is not surprising that after this masterpiece which is the sinking, Hollywood tentara to Olivier Hirschbiegel. And the result is invasion, a science fiction thriller starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig in which a strange alien virus is slowly seizing of human beings. After seeing invasion, one to heist a terrible doubt, and is if the alien virus is also transmitted through the film projected on a screen, that the film not only not thrilled but leaves you totally frozen. More after a short time of anguish which our brain is being debated in this dilemma, came to the conclusion: the affected is the own Hirschbiegel, who has lost the ability to convey emotions to the audience. Leaving aside the usual bugs and inconsistencies of the script, the development of the story is how much less strange, and the character development is simply non-existent. Hirschbiegel has not lost what good do behind the camera, giving the movie a good packaging, although occasionally chaotic Assembly can play tricks. Unlike the characters of invasion, cannot sleep, viewers are victims of a deep torpor. Between yawn and yawn, halfway through the suffering comes the best of the tape, the purported hug between George Bush and Hugo Chávez, which will cause a flood of laughter among the respectable. Nicole Kidman for its part remains in the descending line in which embarked after the hours, while Daniel Craig, Jeremy Northam and Jeffrey Wright dedicated his effort to defend something virtually indefensible.Invasion is practically a disguised, free and totally unnecessary remake. And as a thriller, fails miserably in its first precept, the scheming and keep in suspense to the Viewer. Perhaps the virus made its nest in Hollywood, annulling the capacity of their films to convey emotions.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2408

Tito Chinchan

Hostel 2

muchocine

Part II was never good, and this is certainly not an exception. Stolen the surprise of the first, it is something very insubstantial, slow and heavy, that us is out of the boredom with a little of offal. See and that you delete the brain before reaching the parking.

After see the first and leave quite disgusted with the poor Eastern to which had sopleteado the face, I said not to see the second part neither of coña. But as you know I have less Word to those who leave in the discussions of the TV, so that I have seen. That Yes, knowing of the three scenes of disgust that I I have wisely covered the face. A guy with the hairs of the eggs canos, being silly in that way. In the end.The film is about a boy who has escaped from a species of field of horrors, where the people are dedicated to pay money for killing people. Well, the two scenes begins to discuss three American kids who are in Rome and want to go to Prague to visit her. In these intersects them in the way a woman with everything very well because it suggests a spa in Slovakia, where they were in a Hostel. Uhhhh, that am.Well, let's see. Fear, what is said fear does not give. It gives much more sopor and boredom, given that the little action that runs very lentita and sparingly. Except approaching the end, the rest is a pestiño. Then there are those who say that this shows us the power of money and not be more. I that I learned. I went in the first, that the idea could be good, but the development is mediocre. And scenes of disgust, there are, but as I was prevented, because I can not say if they did or not. Ah, the end is cut the box to laugh, to tontez.In short, part II was never good, and this is certainly not an exception. Stolen the surprise of the first, it is something very insubstantial, slow and heavy, that us is out of the boredom with a little of offal. See and that you delete the brain before reaching the parking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/121

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Volver

muchocine

Return means to flee their own histrionics and clichés and formula it him exalted at the top of Hollywood

Rarely a very concise title sums up so many things. Almodóvar is very large. Knows remade, reform, transform, improve and dare to return to the path to that, himself, is predestined to go; the path of a great director, of a screenwriter round, intuitive, precise and consistent. Great men are only fleeing their own ghosts giving a new recital and returning to demonstrate mastery and genius. "Volver", means, among many other things, recover its Spanish audience, and not continue focusing their stories, above all, the taste of American and foreign criticism. "Back" means to flee in part of its own histrionics and clichés and formula it him exalted at the top of Hollywood. It is risk knowing that he is capable of giving with formulates it proper. And is that, "Volver", mixes drama with comedy, something very complicated to carry out successfully. Touches various topics, complicated scenes, and dares to navigate today and even to treat the social criticism in exact doses. Almodóvar, in this, his latest film, does not forget anyone and does not saturate, not exaggerated. We can taste its visual style, its control of the dramatic twists, his great leadership. It manages to be present, suggest, leave its scent, moving like a ghost without too much stress or force their personal and artistic intentions.Almodovar returns to work from the humility and honesty. It weaves a round history, a powerful and very well lubricated script. It exalts a magnificent cast of actresses and directs them as the well know. I do not understand those who insist on criticizing Penélope Cruz, who here loaded with almost all the leading role and returns, to demonstrate to the world that she is not only an actress beautiful and overwhelming presence, but an actress able to embroider the important roles. Carmen Maura returns, without complexes, to meet again and same. Carmen gets thrill, is real and wonderful, as always. And the rest of the actresses, all of them will be joining the bandwagon of brilliant performances. Lola Dueñas, Chus Lampreave, Blanca Portillo, Yohana Cobo and all others.Men, are all bad, very bad, insignificant presence, this does also as always, in every one of Almodóvar. manchego director the feminist tales, portrays in addition the people of their origins and that go and come to the capital which saw him grow. There is much autobiographical tribute and melancholy. And as the film is romantic, in la Mancha there are windmills, wind, superstition, traditions and the madness that Don Quixote was able to promote to the world. Almodóvar, you know that the film is to have simple things, portray austere places, people in the real world, but with stories and universal dramas, with poetry in all languages. Almodóvar tells the world and dives it, once again, in its own universe, a universe full of intentions, details, subtexts, and messages. Almodovar returns to prove that it is one of the best directors currently, a true lover of cinema and, quite possibly, one of the authors most sober and intelligent than our country has ever known.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/201

Andrés

Flores rotas

muchocine

"Broken flowers" is a hard irony about human relations, vacuum and loneliness, in various forms

I was fortunate to see this movie in the presentation of the new issue of the magazine Godard! Definitely there is no better way to present a film magazine that projecting a sensational film (also in quality of pre - premiere in Lima). But at the same time it was very annoying to find, even among film buffs, people with such bad manners when watching a film. Its damn findings aloud, his dialogues to mezza voce and their stupid cell phones. Funny thing is that "the Lady in yellow", was the person who had left to enter without invitation, the same disturbed to the room with their murmurs. But despite these interferences could taste with attention this great movie of Jim Jarmush.Don receives a pink letter the day that his last girlfriend leaves him. In the letter without a name one of her former lovers informs him that he had his son 20 years ago. Add now the supposed son has left in search of his father, a Bachelor all consider a Don Juan. His friend, fond of mysteries, devises a plan to find the author of the letter. Then Don embarks on a journey by United States to locate his former girlfriends and find a track. "These lines that can make us believe that you it's a film about"someone to learn great lessons in life", perhaps it would be if Don would not be portrayed by Bill Murray and, above all, if the person in charge of this story wasn't Jim Jarmush.""Broken Flowers" (2005) is the Odyssey of a Ulysses who would have preferred to stay at his home. After the departure of his girlfriend, Don does not seem interested in nothing more than sitting on the couch in his room. The persistence of his friend Winston, obsessed by playing to unveil the mystery is what in the end forces him to the first plane. Key track is to find a machine of writing among the possessions of the ex-novias and bring her so that Winston verifies if the letter has been written with it. With this objective and trying to disturb as little as possible, Don appears front gates of old girlfriends. In this Odyssey will be not the sirens to try to stay with the traveller.One of the things that surprises in Jim Jarmush, and at the same time enjoy both, is the use of time in his films. What others may seem boring and pretentious, here the fixed flat long and silences in conversations details the viewer discrete and rewarding, content in every small moment. And "God is in the details" say that Santo Tomas. said in "Broken flowers" there is also a hard irony about human relations. The emptiness and loneliness, in various forms, weigh on the lives of the characters. The communication between them is complicated and tense, full of misunderstandings. Don moves as a zombie, for their girlfriends is that: a dead man who returns to an uncertain search. But you can not expect too much from a zombie, except this. Bill Murray is so funny doing almost anything. Swayed from one place in the car, circulating perfect urbanizations, only a punch achieves this awakening.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/895

Rafa Marin

Déjà Vu

muchocine

The film does not give Truce to the Viewer, get not rolling it in his statement, nor that cirríe the police investigation. We will feel a pleasant and appropriate sense of dèja vu.

There is a before and an after 11-S, and the feeling of helplessness of society to the disaster then boosted with the phenomena of the tsunami and for the United States, with the devastating effects of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. At least the first two disasters plan on the new film by Tony Scott, Deja vu, because the action takes place in the same place and is about a terrorist attack. The reflection that makes the film before shooting clearly towards science fiction and the temporal paradoxes, is what can be done to prevent terrorist sabotage, and if this is possible, what responsibility is towards the victims. Not far from the plot of this movie is that is for me the best novel by Orson Scott Card: keepers of the past: the redemption of Christopher Columbus. There are abundant elements of contact not as time travel itself, but to the responsibility and commitment of the observer observed and all the moral implications that can drag with them. With a devilish pace, a magnificent staging, one picture dirty shows the streets of New Orleans still not have recovered from the effects of the disaster or the effects of the Mardi Grass, without crazy camera or make exaggerated tricks montage of his penultimate film with Denzel Washington, the younger brother of Ridley Scottthat comes over and over again proving that isn't so small, it is able to put the viewer at the crossroads of gender and, without solution of continuity, take him by the hand and ensure that it is not lost in the temporal paradoxes that raises. The plot of the film is simple: a terrorist attack against a ferry loaded with sailors from farra launches police Doug Carlin (Washington) of the ATF (a government agency of which I had not heard before, by the way) to the investigation of the causes. A woman appears dead and tortured and burned on the Bank of the River, but an hour before the attack. It is then a government research group, led by a Val Kilmer that increasingly resembles more to Alec Baldwin, enrolled to Washington so help them investigate, and they show him alleged recordings of all that has happened in the city four days ago and a half. Bit it takes the Viewer (and Washington, which is a Lynx, the uncle), to understand that it is not of recordings, but the quantum technology allows you to open a window to the past and see in real time, but with this gap of four days, how develops the plot of murder and bombing. Ironically, the pirado patriótico-religioso who commits murder is not other but James Caviezel, i.e., Christ himself in the film the passion according to Saint Mel Gibson, who already participated in a similar film from parallel universes and changes in the timeline, this great little often understated gem which is Frequency. The film does not give Truce to the Viewer, get no liar in his statement, or that chirríe the police investigation of the principle with the inevitable time travel than Denzel Washington has to make to the rescue in the last fifteen minutes of projection. If not are you sci-fi fans, it will look like a proper film and it is even possible that the end surprised them. That we are already old in the genus dogs and love above all items travel in time and the paradoxes that these entail, will feel a pleasant and appropriate sense of dèja vu, and leave the film reflecting on how many times in total has traveled the good of Denzel Washington in the past trying to not amend the plan of the terrorist, but their own previous failures, and without knowing it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2846

Francisco Bellón

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

The jungle 4.0 is one of the best action films of recent years, which remains faithful to the spirit of the series to which it belongs

Major studios think that they are coming to the conclusion, better late than never, of remakes fat cows time is coming to an end. And how not, they have already started the search for a new source of income safely and quickly. But one not overly original, because as said, eh?, this is Hollywood! They have become or will soon do so mythical characters of the film's action and adventures such as Rocky, Rambo, John McClane or Indiana Jones. Without forgetting those who never have ido, as James Bond.En the framework of the digital age, where it is virtually unthinkable to see an action movie that do not contain large number of plans and sequences generated by computer, again John McClane. Most irreverent New York Police Department detective is once again in the wrong place and at least suitable time. As if it were a dinosaur, McClane must face a cyber terrorist evil plans. The jungle 4.0 is first and foremost a honest film that doesn't fool your audience, because it offers what it promises, something worthy of praise in the current action cinema. The almost two hours they spend flying, and at that time the Viewer is witness to a frantic and spectacular, action that stands out for its realism versus artificial of the computer-generated. The only that I can put the tape is the short patriotic speech that loose Bruce Willis in the middle of the second Act. Bruce Willis is in its sauce, and fans of the Crystal jungle will be abundantly satisfied with the end result. And the rest of viewers who are looking for authentic entertainment film, also.The jungle 4.0 is one of the best action films of recent years, which remains faithful to the spirit of the series to which it belongs. The fights, chases and explosions are seasoned with the particular sense of humour of John McClane, real raison d ' être of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3407

Ana Belén Pacheco

La Dolce Vita

muchocine

La Dolce Vita is therefore a kind of?Don Quixote? everyone has it on a shelf and has heard of him but if get it in the fight with the windmills you discover that no one has read it actually. It doesn't disappoint.

Recently in a dinner with friends were talking about classic films and he came to light a quite disturbing theme for any film buff. Have anyone had seen La Dolce Vita.¿Esa film of Marcello Mastrolliani that bathe in the Fontana?It is the maximum amount of information that I could get out of my fellow sufferers. La Dolce Vita is therefore a kind of "Don Quixote" everyone has it on a shelf and has heard of him, but if get it in the fight with the windmills you discover that no one has read it actually. And to follow with this literary analogy happens more or less the same, despite the fame of the scene of the fontana La Dolce Vita is not the love between the journalist who interprets Mastroianni and Anita Ekberg, is only part of the mills. Indeed it is the evolution and decline of Marcello Rubini, a multipurpose journalist accustomed to wealth and ephemeral beauty that surrounds their world and that gradually leads to its self-destruction. A dreamer who renounced their ambition to be a writer of success blinded by the melancholy excesses of the "dolce vita" Italian where you will have to face their moral principles.A total of seven stories taking place in the Italian capital fully self contained with a single point in common, his home in Via Veneto, one of the most famous and glamorous of Rome, streets that illustrate the values and attitudes of the antihero: the famous local need of admiration in his lowest moments, the international star Centre of all eyesthe miraculous apparition of the Virgin that generates a catastrophic dimensions media circus, a reunion with an old friend in a very revealing dinner, the visit of his father, a party in a castle that starts the journey to the absolute decline and after a fateful event which I am not going to espoilear finally the man in which Marcello decides to become. I.e., like the mills appear in the first chapters of Don Quixote, Anita and their whims will disappear after half an hour of footage (La Dolce Vita lasts two hours and forty minutes). A brilliantly orchestrated and perfectly shot structure. Certainly of exceptional beauty is the relationship of Marcello with Steiner. One of these conversations that pass to the annals of cinema with an ending that will manage to excite anyone.The question on whether or not a work overrated depends on the tastes of each. It actually has no doubt is that this film represents a time in Italy in which wealthy Europe used it as a valve of escape from their problems. The glamour and the decline of an entire sector of society that found a paradise in developing (a Rome under construction which was still one of the major European cities) for power head-on at your leisure in continuous parties and without obligations, where the paparazzi were the most sought after journalists, sexual liberation reached unsuspected heights (always within the Italian machismo which still remains) and any news could be boughtsold or auctioned. All scenes travel to Roman life, its festivals, customs and nightlife, and sometimes shows a little more of what should, that earned Fellini a reputation of offender and the film a river of ink on their excesses.There have been two great myths in European cinema that will survive all time: Alain Delon and Marcello Mastroianni. La Dolce Vita helped create and maintain the myth of Latin Gigolo deservedly. Until that point the role of the film and real life crisscrossed is only a mystery over the film of Fellini.Cierto is that after The Rocky Horror Picture Show and Blade Runner only La Dolce Vita deserves the title of "eternal decommissioned" and is difficult to find in stores (although recently a pretty decent DVD edition was released) if join you for the terrible duration is not exactly easy to program in television)(never remember seeing in a grid) and for his subject was very censored at the time by sexual liberalism and the image "cheerful" of the Italian middle class that made her unpopular in Italy since its premiere only the passage of time and the international reception have saved La Dolce Vita from oblivion, or by what I have seen of the iconographic oblivionthe next step is to cheer up and see it. It doesn't disappoint. FOR the MITÓMANOS: The scene of the Fontana is one of the most reproduced worldwide. Little they know really that this scene represents freedom. Sylvie, an antojadiza American actress gets to bathe, and encourages his partner at night to mess with her. Marcello ceases to see things and posprimera time in the film acts accepting the invitation. The bathroom actually means for those who have seen the film the first step for the freedom of his characters, the first decisions that will shape their future. It was so cold the night of March in that shot that Mastroianni had to get swimsuit underneath the dress and drink a bottle of Vodka, his co-star spent hours under the jets of water without complaining.The Roman Government grew tired of people emulase this scene and the Fontana is monitored 24 hours a day, become Marcello now costs a fine of 400 for adventurous moviegoers who still dare.DATA of the film: La Dolce Vita won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes International Film Festival in 1960 also won two Academy Award in 1961 for best foreign language film and best costume design (designed by Art Director Piero Gherardi). The film was banned in Spain by censorship, as the newspaper of the Vatican, L'Osservatore Romano, described her as obscene. Not premiered in Spain until 1980. Never had much success in his home country, has been the time which has become a classic of Italian cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3910

Plissken

Hoop Dreams

muchocine

A delight not only for lovers of basket, but for any lover of the documentary no trap or cardboard.

'Hoop Dreams' follows in the footsteps of two kids of 15 years, William Gates and Arthur Agee, who share a required: reaching the glittering early 1990s NBA. Both are among the best gamers of the dangerous playgrounds of Cabrini Green, Chicago's gangs and crack. And both are selected by the prestigious St. Joseph´s High School, birthplace of legendary players like Isiah Thomas. will they be able to Will and Art of continue shining in a very demanding environment, in full rise to the Mecca of the basket?The great merit of 'Hoop Dreams' is that it lasts almost three hours or you find out. Part of the sports documentary to use, with kids trying to emulate his idol, but very soon you realize the weight that an environment as Will and Arthur: families living on the threshold of poverty, friends putting you to the limits of the law, teenage pregnancies. If to this we add an educational system that revolves around the success and forget the second and sports requirements frankly tough for kids 16 years, we have a real Odyssey. A journey in which we see how boys become men, and how life put to the test their desire to not only succeed, but survive.Steve James, to make matters worse, turns out to be a great director. Alternately brilliant and truly epic sports episodes (from 'Hoosiers' had not lived so exciting moments) with images that portray a way of life to the limit (family living without electricity, the hustling of drugs of the father of Arthur before the eyes of his own son). And always with an enormous respect for all and each of the characters. Director clean look allows us to move with each small step given by the two protagonists in his slow Ascension (still them over four years) to fame.As only he could point out the excessive length of the film, but I recognise that in the end I couldn't believe that had swallowed me a documentary of 170 minutes, how fast that happened. Moreover, a delight not only for lovers of basket, but for any lover of the documentary no trap or cardboard. 9.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3630

Txapulin

La brújula dorada

muchocine

And I came here to recommend not going to see it because it is a sovereign boredom, and it is has a critique to the Church that I could not enjoy because I neither learned...

Go! I just found out now that the Church and the ultracatólicos groups recommend not go see the movie because it is a criticism to the Church. And I came here to recommend not going to see it because it is a sovereign boredom, and it is has a critique to the Church that I could not enjoy because I neither learned. How sad that above with the controversy do you a favor (because we know that with these things earn spectators rather than get lost) and also undermine the gaze of the poor and stupid Viewer, which already finds difficult it to go with the mind open to the film that goes over to see something that isn't, find three feet to the cat and ask José Luis Perales to Olmo.La Luis peli is a round trip of pot in that there is an alternate universe where each person has a pet in which his soul is deposited (hmmm, that almost describes the real world, now that I realize, with old with their poodle, ragged hippipunkis with its hungry Wolf dogs, MariCarmen and their puppets.), where a girl travels to the North Pole to provoke a war between Bruges, polar bearsSiberian and Gypsies and to save other children from being subjects of experiments with their mascotalmas. Ah! And the excuse of everything are a magical powder that connect different universes. To make matters worse the movie abruptly ends, i.e., not just because I guess expected appears a sequel soon, which I declinaré kindly go see claiming to have forgotten this first part.PS: Not, nor Daniel 'James Bond' Craig or Eva 'Bond Girl' Green save the film because, to increase fraud, just a few minutes. Ah! And Nicole Kidman 'Botox' is appalling.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1547

Juan David

Una verdad incómoda

muchocine

This important documentary for anyone who intends to continue living on the planet is 85% enriching information and 15% political propaganda and although some annoy to this last point it is An Inconvenient Truth is a great documentary.

It is highly likely that if you have the minimum degree of common sense to see this documentary is one of the more frightening possible and is also highly likely that once you finish seeing it a sense of helplessness fill your body; This important documentary for anyone who intends to continue living on the planet is 85% enriching information and 15% political propaganda and although some annoy to this last point indeed is that An Inconvenient Truth is a great documentary, deservedly winning the Oscar for best documentary for a couple of days.For those who don't know Al Gore was Vice President of USA during the Bill Clinton administration and presidential candidate for the Democrats was closely defeated by George W Bush in a controversial election that still causes controversy, the rest of the story because you know as well that Gore is a much more charismatic than the monigote to even hold the Presidency of that country.Now Gore has devoted itself to give lectures around the world to bring about awareness of the climate change product of human pollution and this documentary is basically the presentation of this Conference combined with elements of life itself of Gore; as regards the first point the documentary features pretty educational as the main points of the problem as well as knock down many myths that surround it.However it is the introduction of passages from the life of Gore be uncomfortable even though they are not too shocking in the context of the documentary and does not preclude that the educational content of this is highly valuable. Four star and is on DVD.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/715

Jeremy Fox

Infiltrados

muchocine

It tough, dry, vibrant and intense, very intense. A lesson in cinema from a master that many retired prematurely.

The outcry is unanimous: Scorsese has become. I dare to correct this clamor: the great Scorsese has become. The other, the very good Scorsese was not gone. The Scorsese who has returned is the big occasions. Which is able to count in the first fifteen minutes, merced to a frenetic montage that lapses do not at any time, a history which would give to another movie and that defines us a few characters in accurate way, with the precision of a surgeon which we were accustomed. It has become the great Scorsese and that is something that deserves to be celebrated.Remember that the film is a remake of "Infernal Affairs" (entitled on dvd in Spain "play dirty") and on its synopsis only say that it is the story of two infiltrators, in the police and the Irish mafia of South Boston. As you can see it's a police thriller and as such the film is a marvel in which everything works: the tension, the impressive pace, how to shoot the shocking scenes of action. All. "But I have said that it has become the great Scorsese and implies something else.""Infiltrators" is a reflection on the truth and the destructive power of the lie, the loyalty and the paths we must confront to keep. Scorsese offers us a Treaty on the sense of duty through the history of some young people become police officers. Some simply to carry pistol and others by the authentic meaning of the plate.Addressing the great screenplay by William Monahan, Scorsese exhibits all his talent and with him his entire team. Special attention on relentless Thelma Schoonmaker mounting and the soundtrack of Howard Shore.Punto and apart to talk about the actors because they are all Oscar. What happens is that effective veterans such as Martin Sheen and Alec Baldwin are eclipsed by a Jack Nicholson who is more Nicholson than ever and that, for those we love, i.e.. His voice, his look, his ability to know when exceeding and when not, has made him a legend of Hollywood.A his side some of the best young actors of today: Mark Wahlberg, Matt Damon and Leonardo DiCaprio. Although all (especially the latter two) are they leave, I'm going to emphasize in a DiCaprio that a gap between the large, thanks to performances as immense as it is gaining little by little. We must bow to the talent of this actor able to tell with your eyes an entire universe of inner anger, containment, hatred, love or fragility. A more than deserved nomination for an Oscar for this role could be waiting for him. What more to say? I strongly recommend you to see this film. It is hard, dry, vibrant and intense, very intense. A lesson in cinema from a master that many retired prematurely.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/611

Tito Chinchan

Zombies party

muchocine

100% Hilarious. The zombies, slower than el caballo del Malo are continuous laughter.

You have to see the amount of movies from zombies that record lately. If Resident Evil 2, that if dawn of the dead, that if 28 days. And each more and more bad. But this was another very different looks. In the photo on the cover, a guy in an elevator with face barmy and surrounded by zombies with face of Kumar. The movie promised.And go that if promised. The movie is a descojono continuous, such that if you estornudas you've lost three points. He is a guy with face of lelo who has trouble with his girlfriend. Lives with a fat fumeta (fuck, see all me are fumetas) which is a dirty and a guy with bad host. And spend life in a bar called "Winchester". Suddenly, with good reason, the bride lets just when a virus attacks the city. Of course, the lelo don't realize that half the city is zombie until you they don't try to bite the jugular. And decides that he must save the bride and her mother.100% Hilarious. The zombies, slower than el caballo del Malo are continuous laughter. A detail that made me laugh. Attack them on the porch of his house a few zombies and say "what do we do?" "Sit to drink a tea" and sit on the couch at home while the zombies drool-worthy window. Asks one to another "still there" and rises the fat, remove the curtain are restregandose zombies by the glass and says "Yes" and sits down again. At the end go to kill them and begin to launch them cooking utensils. A colander, a funnel, the toaster, etc. As do not kill them it (leave the zombies on the same site) (a) the record of the lelo collection. And so the entire film.I recommend it strongly, but then I don't want to hear that if the movie is a truño, that if I am an asshole, if I you're going to start with the legs and things as well. To me I liked so much that I've seen twice.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3458

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Shootem up

muchocine

Spasmodic, fun, adrenalítica: one of the best films of evasion that might be in the placid intimacy of a movie theater...

Descerebrada, adrenalítica, intoxicated dreadful action, Shoot ' em up is (by far) the best possible evasion film proposal. Little or no plot, it strips all vocation of seriousness and arrambla lujuriosamente, with all imaginable topics, he satirized them, wrap them in a still choreography of savagery, which do not obstruct the sense of irreverent comic, orchestrated by a very intelligent mind (Michael Davis) who has managed to twinning clichés of action - killers with soul cinema, of bad guys that do not die ever, rocambolescas situations that always end successfully for the hero - with coarse humor, shockingly uncouth times.Shoot ' em up is pure cartoon, although the model is not graphic. The construction of the characters is archetypal, the script is symbolic: the only thing that ensures entertainment is a prodigious Assembly and an excellent sense of rhythm. Each scene is a consequence of the previous and enables the following. The shots are lines of text, but the actors are credible and gesticulate and move as if to take the joke seriously. The official criticism, the matrimoniada with the purity and a classic sense of forms and intentions, has made pieces. Perhaps disagree to any film to mark a soon or a later in frivolous or sublime or palomitera history of cinema, but at least there is a rigid observance of a sometimes forgotten approach in those who are engaged in making movies: Entertainment. Outside of this historicist rigour, the unbiased Viewer has before his astonished eyes a great spectacle, an operetta of gunpowder and impossible stunts I would already like to Yes John McClane or some inspired Steven Seagal. Clive Owen is not any action hero or the movie promises franchisee who squeeze his success at the box office. There perhaps rid the charm of this surprise and everything is regulated by other parameters. These here presented reduced its field of action, never better said, to pure escapism, the movement as the essence of the art of hila an image with another in a film montage. Battered its high doses of violence is legitimate, even necessary, but Davis makes apology for the destruction or praises the cainita engine of the human soul. If Tarantino has vindicated the plasticity of violence, Davis - this amazing tape - claimed the leisure component, naïve. The difference between the two (this idea offered me my wife at bottom of seat) it is that the first is not ironic, and the second, at least in this remake arrogant, Yes.Devoid of breaks, ametrellada in a poetic end - in rustic prose of its plot - Shoot ' em up can be considered as an anthology of scenes of action, a sort of greatest hits. There is no filler material: everything shines with the same wit, identical-minded joke. Until the hero emptying his pistol loader while it copula - said without shock - with the moza Bellucci, which is every day more carnal and beautiful - produces hilarity, but there is no ridiculous one. It seems that we have seen that image throughout life, in lots of movies. Its dynamism her brainy analysis excludes whoever to do those things. This frivolous bagatelle consumes little neurons of the risky spectator who sits in the Chair knowing that it will attend a stunning session of shots without hardly rest. Its unbelievable hubris needed complicity. Only that. The rest is literature. As a partner of reviews, "an honest film with itself and with the public, exemplary action cinema, is its balance between vulgarity and ingenuity to be entertaining without lapsing into unnecessary Bendy" (J.A.P.)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2150

Patri

Diamante de sangre

muchocine

The fact that show the conflict diamonds so clearly is what saves him from being a simple common and inconsequential action film.

Blood diamond is generally a fairly conventional film, especially in its form, in many moments is like a film of any action of Hollywood, what the difference a bit of these films is that it talks about an important subject on which never speaks in the media, the traffic of diamonds in Africa and on the very painful situation facing this continent. The fact that show the conflict diamonds so clearly is what saves him from being a simple common and inconsequential action film.Leonardo DiCaprio continues to demonstrate that he is a good actor, I think that it could become one of the greats of Hollywood and is be handsome does not have to be a disadvantage to be good interpreter. Blood diamond shows that not only Scorsese knows to get him the best performances. His role is that of a white African who is engaged in trafficking in diamonds, suffers an evolution throughout the film, which is quite predictable, but that is blame the script, rather than his performance.The other protagonist is Djimon Hounsou, an actor most known and that, like DiCaprio, has been nominated for an Oscar for this role, but as secondary. It also makes a good performance, it is a pretty reserved character which does not express what he feels, except when it can no longer more and explodes. Also has an impressive voice (in the original version, of course).As Jennifer Connelly, not draw me much attention, I think that it is correct and nothing else, as it is usually always.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4203

Andrés Pons

Manual de Serial Killer para principiantes

muchocine

Trace Slobotkin after a long career dedicated to television scripts made his debut in the direction and the truth seeing this horror I ask it to park his career as a filmmaker.

TRACE SLOBOTKIN after a long career dedicated to television scripts made his debut in the direction and the truth seeing this horror I ask it to park his career as a filmmaker.It is not that the script is quite grim, the idea of a young apprentice serial killer gave to at least make a fun horror comedy. The trouble is that the promising material is a starting point interesting deflated precipitous as flat characters and lacking in interest where boredom is not off in a TV staging, developing between the interpreters include a couple of familiar faces, the man of sand of the third part of Spider-man THOMAS HADEN CHURCH and the former child prodigy COREY FELDMAN to feature in the 1980s with lost boys or the GOONIES.None of them gives luster joining pathetic interpretations of the artistic team, all of this is outweighed by an anthological ending where the senseless covers the story that even serves for a laugh that apparently the mediocre director of truth believed that into something useful to take it seriously.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2532

José A. Peig

Zodiac

muchocine

At the end what we have left is the impression that we have seen a conventional police thriller, which was intended to be much more than it is, that at times he notices too the rigidity of its schematic and to not always achieve adequately convey the idea that the Chronicle progresses according to a specific dramatic content. Easier: a forceful, but superficial narration which is ultimately...

The narrative is an art of synthesis. Narrate is to compose a whole whose parts are expressed attributes or nuances that have to be functional to conceptual or dramatic effects at all. In his new film, David Fincher proposes a thorough and obsessive chronicle relates that on the police world of crime and to the influence of the sensationalist media. "Such a chronic is structured as a puzzle in which its various elements (police, criminals, suspected criminals and press) interact in a game of compulsive feedback: see how police seek and/or try to ignore the relevance of the criminal matter so much as the criminal police is looking for or hides the device media and police for weeks or even years.""Zodiac" is not the narration of a mystery, but a process that unfolds in all the antagonistic pillars of the function, an obsessive process whose raison d ' être we can glimpse the implied a revitalized gender laws - that non-reformulated, very common mistake - in the hands of Fincher, and becomes a smart product of revisitación to a paradigmatic areas. Importantly, the purpose of the speech is not knowing the identity of the criminal, but the progression towards a certain psychological state, which concretizes itself in the final climax of the story through the character known as Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal). The narrative strength is based on the superb construction of characters. We are talking about psychological film, and in that area the profiles human are essential, various psychological patterns expressed by each of the protagonists, different ways of dealing with the conflict, are a very decent representation in the characterization and development of them. The conflict, in this case, isn't limited to the mysterious identity of the offender, a criminal who seems to adopt multiple identities, depending on the findings, recesses or curves that encouraged further in the labyrinth of the suspicions and the slopes. The conflict also materializes in a "why", and a search for meaning to hunting and capture by the representatives of the law and order. Why search for to "Zodiac"?. Is it a real entity or a product of the press and the playful intelligence of an anonymous citizen?. In this film, the relationships of cause and effect between crime and (alleged) criminal mask, as an effect of the proposed game. "Zodiac" is a killer that evaporates when closer seems to be resolution, and closest us is the more distant in memory over two decades. This ambiguous atmosphere as a fog of evanescent suspicions is the best definition of the spirit of the work.Also highlight the excellent work of mounting and visual rhythm, two essential tools to keep the attention of the viewer in a narrative that often becomes too dense and provide more data of the assimilated, but all this is according to go creating the aforementioned psychological state of the protagonists, is not a mere whim of the writer.Brushing the perfection as film representation of a chronology of events resulting in a dramatic story, Zodiac fails a fundamental aspect. It ends not coagulate its leitmotiv in its intention to give the Viewer. In other words; You cannot find a way of articulating the whole through which express a meaning giving more significant force to the story. Despite all its virtues, or Zodiac leaves an aftertaste to emptiness, that has not finished off the ground if we attend to all its goals and suggestive content. That is why, in the end what we have left is the impression that we have seen a conventional police thriller, which was intended to be much more than it is, that at times he notices too the rigidity of its schematic and to not always achieve adequately convey the idea that the Chronicle progresses according to a specific dramatic content. Simple: is a strong but superficial narration ultimately.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2781

José A. Peig

Dracula

muchocine

Coppola Yes knew offer something personal and genuine in a film that is gradually winning admirers as he will pass the time. However, the irregularity of the set and the same excesses just playing against him.

In 1992, Francis Ford Coppola offered us this revisitación to the myth of Dracula, and on that occasion we could say that, while you may like more or less, the experiment contributed quite to an icon already very overused and revisited in the past. This "does Bram Stoker? s Dracula" is not exactly a vulgar creation, although in the early 1990s it was Yes think recycle Count Dracula was a little novel occurrence.From the formal point of view, this film is a dazzling discovery of successive images that recreate environments and own icons of the genre classic horror, a frame Assembly organized in a way that comes to be an overwhelming visual Symphony full barroquismos, icons and symbologies belonging to various areas such as religion, medicine, sex, aristocratic lifethe same film and, more specifically, the horror film primeval, with clear echoes of Nosferatu, the werewolf, the Mummy, the Exorcist, etc. The music of the images is accompanied by a penetrating and breathtaking soundtrack composed by Woiciech Kilar, which fits perfectly to each visual compass each gesture or dramatic turn, and at the end, rather than a conventional narrative film, appears a video that pays a worthy tribute to the corpus of icons and creatures of legend. The plot framework relies on some basic issues that define almost all visual and narrative structure: sex, madness, the blood and the rebellion against fate and gods for a love lost and sought through "oceans of time". Love is the impulse that survives and manages to defeat death and dignifies even to the most despicable creatures, prisoner of his resentment and the obscurities that surround him, turned into nasty beast of the night, bat, Wolf, wrinkled and decrepit monster in the solitude of a castle that moves in the shadows, in the memories of a unreal, dream-like space: the eternal nightmare of the "no-muerte", the price to pay for rebelling against the creator. Here Count Dracula is depicted us as a deeply sad and powerful, being a God of the animality of everything that moves away from humanity. On the other side of the line, Mina, embodying the most beautiful innocence, the only thing that can redeem the beast. This is the fundamental axis: the ultraterrestrial and eschatological obsessively human, visceral love story, a metaphysics of love and sex which gives the film a strange romantic beauty. The essence of the visual poem by Coppola is a romantic idea of evil, death and love, and the most sordid and dark corners of the existence.Thus, Coppola Yes knew offer something personal and genuine in a film that is gradually winning admirers as he will pass the time. However, the irregularity of the set and the same excesses just playing against him. Say that some of the elements of the design and the caricaturisation of Count Dracula and the other characters ends up being abusive: Van Helsing is more a cliché than a functionally valid character and the character that plays Keanu Reeves (who is presumed a main role) is on the sidelines and delocalised work, another pointless cliché, and the same applies to the rest of characters; they are not integrated in the great drama of romantic and sinister that aims only characters really articulated in the great visual Symphony to Mina and Dracula. You can be said as a result, the film loses interest when Mina and the count will disappear from the scene, by the paleness of the remaining set, which, in addition, little help mediocre performances from a cast that leaves much to be desired. In such a case, only the splendid picture and rich visual imagery manage to maintain interest.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/942

Tito Chinchan

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Film of pseudo-scientific and criminal action that makes it imperative to leaving the brain at home. As you do like me and you questions everything that happens, it will end and you'll still saying "man masters".

Gordo is Van Kilmer, my mother, if almost not fit onto the plane. And this is not to mention the clone of Fernando Alonso coming out trying to sanity the screenplay of science fiction which has the film. By the way, it leaves vu it must post that molará them the expression, given that the tape has nothing to do with leaves them vus, right?The film is a brutal attack suffered by the city of New Orleans, still recovering from the blow of Hurricane Katrina. A ferry full of military exploits causing half thousand victims. A police officer who is in charge of the case finds a body, found an hour before the explosion which seems to have died in the same. Pulling the thread, it comes to be recruited by a group of the Government which seems to have the power of days earlier, see what happened exactly four and a half days.Well, not be good to say. I can with the flying Chinese films, with the Martians, with superheroes, etc, but with them claiming to be serious and kicking the elementary physics, I cannot. And that happened to me with this. The entire film is based on the happy machine that shows us the happened days ago and there is a moment in which the thing is despendola and I do not think anything serious. Then they talk about travel in time and already I repatean. For the rest, is a tape of action with some explosions and perhaps camouflaged by a somewhat light police investigation. It is not very bad, but I can not with her.In short, explanations and criminal action which makes essential film left brain at home. As you do like me and you questions everything that happens, it will end and you'll still saying "man masters".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/918

Silvia

El ilusionista

muchocine

It is not only a story of love and magic but is basically a suspense film in which the Viewer may wonder if what you are seeing is real or is a product of fiction.

When we attend a magic show, often are afraid we learned the trick and leave behind this aura of mystery that surrounds all the games of magic. But in the illusionist, both the Prince in Prague and the police of the place are obsessed with discovering what are the secrets that hides the magician Eisenheim (Edward Norton). And it is that his tricks are so spectacular that they seem to result of some strange supernatural power.The story begins, as it is imaginable, with the magician Eiseheim showing his artistic abilities on stage, with a public encandilado before his mysterious tricks. From here, the movie takes place in a flashback that will explain the beginnings of the protagonist as a wizard from his childhood until his success.As a teenager, Eiseheim was madly in love with Sophie von Teschen, (played by the deadpan Jessica Biel), an unrequited love which is truncated but returns to stoking years later. As they are people of different class and social status will live a clandestine relationship to the purest style of Romeo and Juliet. They are forced to separate and are when they are adults but the beautiful Sophie was already the fiancée of the Prince in Prague (Rufus Sewell). Everything will be impediments to post magician that both the Prince and the police will try to at all costs find out his tricks. But the love story is the least developed element and that promised more from the beginning. Perhaps the fact that the film is narrated from the point of view of the character of detective police played by Paul Giamatti generates a distance from the Viewer to the couple, so that after a promising start, it is hard to be complicit in his passion and feel empathy for the characters.But it is not only a story of love and magic but is basically a suspense film in which the Viewer may wonder whether what you are seeing is real or is a product of fiction created by the wizard. With the death of one of the characters, the story will take paths of police intrigue, those in which the viewer can play guess the murderer.At the technical level should be emphasized a soundtrack and an atmosphere cared to detail that manage to perfectly recreate the atmosphere of light and shadows lived in Vienna from the year 1900. The script is correct although it suffers some ups and downs: after a promising start he reaches a turning point of narrative stagnation that extends until near the end. A final, which although it can guess, no ceases to amaze. History is resolved well in a way that in the puzzle of the film, the pieces end up fitting perfectly.Leaving aside the possible shortcomings, the public that most will enjoy the film will be willing to be lead, and believe that the wonderful illusions created by the wizard have something of reality. If we leave aside the logic gets to a point where no us blend-naremos tricks and can fully enjoy the magic shows. An entertaining story, a nice drama more unpretentious than entertain which magic show and get significantly its purpose. The story exemplifies the eternal struggle between logic (the reason) and emotion, illusion. But, as it arises in the film, will the illusion be the truth?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/522

Matías Cobo

La noche de los girasoles

muchocine

It is one of those pequeñas-grandes tapes that our film gives us from time to time and who come to corroborate a maximum of good cinema: before that money and the abundance of means, the most important are good ideas.

The film is often nurture of clichés that, despite its repeated use, will not stop working. Does do one of them we know it very well and even more in recent times, with? remakes? recent as the Texas Chainsaw Massacre or the hills have eyes. I am referring to the terrible events in harsh, almost unpopulated location, where the days pass with a dull everyday life. On the night of the sunflowers, rookie Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo puts his account at one of these sites, in particular, in an Avila village typical of a rural Spain endangered. In this calm scenario, the story of the film details the details of a typical event, increasingly more bulky, black Chronicle of news. And to maintain interest, the story is told in a fragmented way, style of Arriaga, and introduces an interesting twist in his plot to the spectator recompose the puzzle of the facts.The discovery of a cave in the village is lived by neighbors with anticipation. The single possibility that the underground cavity has some archaeological value awakens the illusions of a few people getting that ansian back "on the map". As said the Mayor of the town, not without some ingenuity, the key to achieving this is "rural tourism". So the arrival of the espeléologos is received in plan Bienvenido Mr. Marshall. Before that happen, Sánchez-Cabezudo has already sown the concern in the viewer with an event narrated at the beginning of the film: the rape and murder of a young woman occurred in the vicinity of the village. Thus this plot and the espeléologos seem to flow along similar paths and with common characters, but the script will likely play a smart dismissal followed with interest.In the ensemble cast of the film, the best-known face is of Carmelo Gómez, who complies with the common solvency in its role as one of the cavers, stands out a secondary always plausible, Celso Bugallo, and surprising the bella Judith Diakhate interpretation. Manuel Morón, that usual face in almost all productions, large and small, our film is perfect in the role more unpleasant and complex of the tape.The night of the sunflowers is one of those pequeñas-grandes tapes that our film gives us from time to time and who come to corroborate a maximum of good cinema: before that money and the abundance of means, the most important are good ideas. And despite being attached to own the thriller conventions, his story also offers interesting insights into a rural Spain devoured by the mass exodus to the city and that, practically, is poised to become an echo of the past. If it crosses it in a bulletin board, not her dispose with the ease and lightness, that sometimes we sneer at our cinema. It will be rewarded, and more than the price of your entry.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/414

Alberto Concepción

Alatriste

muchocine

Despite the successes (that is), it is obvious that is an undoubted lack of hook. The principal of this blame the plot.

Not few occasions where films with an overwhelming promotion, they turn out to be a real fiasco. And is that the objective is quite simple: attract the masses to the cinemas. This translates into a major fundraiser in taquilla.pero also, although not always, in a true disappointment: is this the outcome that we this time? Much depends on the expectations that have previously this production, but probably for many Yes has been the case.Blockbuster, the most expensive film in the history of the Spanish cinema, actors with international prestige. 'Alatriste' we presented as a film epic and called to create a before and a later in the national cinematography, but is no doubt that it has not happened: it has failed take an adventure story, nor print excitement and interest. And it is that despite the successes (that is), it is obvious that is an undoubted lack of hook. The main blame for this is the plot, storyline lacking any: everything is based on capturing scenes, often without any determination, on the comings and goings of the 'Captain', in an effort to useless by summarizing the five books of Arturo Pérez-Reverte in a history that has home, no knot or outcome. And although this should not be always a problem, in this case Yes becomes all a problem, with the result of a failed product for many, or worse still, a failure of the current Spanish film.The portrait of the century of gold, the 'Golden and dark' time of our history, is probably the highlight of the film: decorated, photography, somber tone that surrounds permanent tape maquillaje.el is fantastic. But otherwise, the vacuum is obvious. Quevedo, count-Duke of Olivares, Philip historical IV.personajes, despite being not at all bad portrayed, lacking depth in their roles.Viggo Mortensen, one of the main attractions that was a priori, not disappointed: despite the fact that her accent collides a bit at the beginning, one is just getting used. In fact, the weight of history (and the film) falls on him, and despite making a commendable performance, fails to make the film to take off. The rest of the actors, better or worse profiteers, do their work properly, or at least mostly: Javier camera, Juan Echanove, Enrico Lo Verso, Elena Anaya, Ariadna Gil, and Pilar López de Ayala (in a very short role) meet, although he could not say the same of Blanca Portillo, that does what it can in his male role; and Unax Ugalde and Eduardo Noriega, who they note too 'cool' to the 17TH century.The soundtrack and sound effects seem to be a true reflection of what the Viewer is found before: good ideas and purposes, but totally unused long, have as a consequence an inappropriate positioning of the music in the scenes of fighting and a lack of emotion in other passages of the film.Thus, we find the fundamental problem of this title, and that it well serves as a summary: an attempt to have something big and not knowing how to do it. This time not are you can blame the failure to the lack of means, as 24 million euros given for something else. much more: Agustín Díaz Yanes, has been half way, possibly collapsed. Even the battle scenes have the force: why not some flat better exploited, or larger? What happens with emotion? is it that he could not count with more extras?Good luck to the next.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/841

Jose Contreras

El perfume

muchocine

The joke, hard to laugh because it lasts two hours, and because it is also a bit philosophical, is that love, that thing that we both like, is a lie. Nobody is going to love ever, because what else can perceive, experience, wish or love of us is our perfume.

When someone talks about a book that has not liked tells you that it is well written. Always to oígo someone say that a book is well written I think that has finished it the force. The books that my I like are not well written, simply are great. "The perfume" I thought it was a great book, why I hated to hear that it was well-written. I hated when someone said that Süskind knew a lot of aromas. "The perfume" is not a manual of smells. If I were a manual of odors would not be a great book.For Süskind odors are an exercise in Synesthesia, something like talk about colors to describe a music. In fact, the film uses music that we understand the emotion of the protagonist. The smell is that indefinable thing that makes some people like us and others we are indifferent or unbearable. The perfume is what everyone seeks when he undergoes cosmetic surgery, buy expensive clothes, gets involved in workshops of speaking well, good manners, or read books on how to appeal to the people. Wonderful perfume, like everyone is what everyone wanted to find, but the only person in the world who know how to manufacture it is Jean-Baptiste Grenouille.De Tykwer film I like reading that has made Süskind. If someone does not like you can not say that it is well written, but we can talk about photography. What Süskin was proposed, in the background, was launching an absolutely wicked sarcasm. Once achieved the sublime, all characters gives them equal justice. Probably, also, to all spectators. The joke, hard to laugh because it lasts two hours, and because it is also a bit philosophical, is that love, that thing that we both like, is a lie. Nobody is going to love ever, because what else can perceive, experience, wish or love of us is our perfume.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/804

José Córdoba

The Queen

muchocine

The Queen is a surprise, a small well narrated film, well written and miraculously starring Helen Mirren.

I cannot with the biographical films. They tend to be hagiographies which, although showing the dark side of a real person, always appears anti-aliasing, smoothing the edges and possible rough edges. They also tend to want to tell too many things, to cover periods of time far and, as the saying goes, who covers very little press. Thus most successful are those biopics that tell us a brief period of a person's life than those who try to reflect her life on screen. The Queen of Stephen Frears was in the latter group.The film narrates the reactions of Queen Elizabeth II of England and newly appointed Prime Minister Tony Blair in the seven days following the death of Diana of Wales. A priori it is an issue that no attention too, and that did not interest me too and, however, Frears, its screenwriter and, above all, an ACTRESS Madam named Helen Mirren get interest not decay and you involucres in history.The film told in quasi documentary tone, in fact is punctuated by images of the news of the moment, begins with the presentation of Tony Blair to the Queen, having won the elections. Already from the beginning see paths to the characters with the marriage Blair, dismissive, mocking with the monarchy and the derogatory Queen, superior with respect to the commoner. During the film, attitudes will evolve, being very striking that of Blair. And is that, unlike the illusionist, the characters reflect the events, the time, and, although between the beginning and the end of the film barely two months have passed, the characters have changed mirror suffered developments, have a background.The film's interesting because of how different characters used Diana's death: Blair takes advantage of the indifference of the monarchy to monopolize the role initially; Prince Charles undertakes that its image doesn't come out damaged, approaching Blair, at the expense of damaging the image of his mother; the husband of the Queen and her mother prefer to act as if nothing had happened, unable to give his arm to twist, to go against tradition. And in the middle is the one hand insensitive to events, but on the other Queen seeing that you can lose the affection of the people. All the characters are very careful, we understand their motivations and goals, we can understand them despite away who are of us.Special mention deserves Helen Mirren among all stakeholders. His performance is brilliant, contained, without fanfare, meticulous in detail, splendid. Master tempo, the gestures, the column, the breathing. Create a character with its own entity, not mimicry with the real model but creation from the actress. The rest of the cast is also very good, but the work of this woman is in another League. Moments as his emotion to the beauty of a deer and its subsequent dead or when receiving a bouquet of flowers from a girl, are unforgettable, especially, in contrast to the coldness to it before everything with Diana.La Frears realization is simple and efficient, providing a good rhythm for the film preventing decay interest. Photography is realistic, approaching the documentary tone and clearly distinguishing aspects deprived of public characters. On the other hand, Desplat music is original and very elaborate in this style of productions, although remember to work somewhat for Birth (reincarnation).The Queen is a surprise, a small well narrated film, well written and miraculously starring Helen Mirren.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3558

Francisco Bellón

Canciones de amor en Lolitas Club

muchocine

Love songs at Lolita´s Club confirms two very worrying data, on the one hand the absolute inability of Vicente Aranda for filmmaking, and on the other the decrease dive as actor Eduardo Noriega.

The film, like life, is full of a cruel and terrible irony. And it is that while many directors sweat blood to get funding for his works, despite having amply proved their worth, others her get smoothly to his recent films are counted as a fiasco.This is the case of Vicente Aranda, returns to the film after its disastrous strained white, one of the worst Spanish films of recent decades. The truth is that after seeing love songs at Lolita´s Club should give reason to the gossips, which say that Aranda already only films to enjoy more lush of the current film scene with the presence of some of the actresses. The film there is no where take it, is that after five minutes one already has tired of listing errors. The story is more insipid and tasteless and fails to engage and excite is not credible in no time. Vicente Aranda mistakes of bundle not only improper from a filmmaker of his career, but improper from a novel director. That scene at the beginning where the camera focuses on the mouths of the actors portends the worst, but fortunately the capricho de Aranda will not more. They come to be pathetic levels of a regrettable and absolutely denied Eduardo Noriega driving, not to mention the levels which should appear duplicate. It is also difficult to understand the need to Yohana Cobo, Lara of Miguel and other actresses who interpret the prostitutes of the club with accents strange instead of having caught South American actresses. The only positive point of the film is the work of Flora Martínez, that brings forward as a misspelled and worse developed character can.Love songs at Lolita´s Club confirms two very worrying data, on the one hand the absolute inability of Vicente Aranda for filmmaking, and on the other the decrease dive as actor Eduardo Noriega.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1977

JLO

La Condesa de Hong Kong

muchocine

The fleeting appearance of the own Chaplin as a dizzy bartender - a cameo by only ten seconds to the sumo - does not become or even only thing salvageable from this pastiche. Slow curtain.

The Countess of Hong Kong are already few traits, only vestiges of the great filmmaker who was Charles Spencer Chaplin. At the beginning, the conundrum of the doors open and the exaggerated flight, or only in the gestures of a correct Sophia Loren in his role; We are Charles and his genius.Sitcom, choral, anachronistic and failed from all points of view; shot up with a certain color off, so weary as the own script and the tasteless unjustified cameos of the family Chaplin.Grandes faults in assembling, unimaginable in an artist with the dedication and the past, for example, that Sophia Loren (said the best away from the film) change from one scene to another not only hairstyle, but hair color?, revealing a great artist in a stage, say to be good, senile.!The constant fights - and indifference - during filming between the protagonists, accentuates the grim fame of the film. During a dance in the ocean liner, the best sentence occurs: "Dad says that it is should love everyone, less the Communists."The fleeting appearance of the own Chaplin as a dizzy bartender - a cameo by only ten seconds to the sumo - does not become or even only thing salvageable from this pastiche. Slow curtain.Summary: Last film of Chaplin, also shot in England. This time in technicolor and cinemascope, with two dazzling stars of the moment. A diplomat newly appointed millionaire (Marlon Brando), falls for a polizonte dancer in a cabaret in Hong Kong (Sophia Loren) during the course of the trip by boat toward the us. Major box office failure.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1861

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Moscow Zero

muchocine

The worst movie I have seen since Pepito pools or Jenaro from 14.

Cut and confit for exclusive use of eager paranormal emotions and clueless adults youth, Moscow zero does not convince anyone. It is a perverse exercise of degradation of film as an art, a tacky show of aspirations because Val Kilmer, Vincet Gallo and some giving another divo already at closing to participate. It tells the story of an anthropologist lost in the hell of the Moscow underground.And hell was the theater, dear readers: pain in the Chair, the feeling that the time, such as precious jewel, is squeezed, and enormous desire to the 90 minutes are completed hastily or that the Planner has a rush of self-respect and, failing in its ethical principles, unplug the machine and out to the corridor and honestly return the euros to viewers. Then they will appreciate. And do not write more because of when in they want when write twenty lines instead of the usual it desparrame semantic that gives me so much pleasure and which I inevitably aboco my natural cinephiles. Much is this. It deserves little. Anything. Silence. He should not have written this review. It should not have me swallowed so embarrassing footage. Fact is. Regalado notice.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/832

Torbe

Una verdad incómoda

muchocine

Do do after seeing that movie, the saying I always say of? fuck, fuck, that the world is going to end? charged sense.

After seeing this movie, the saying I always say "fuck, fuck, that the world is going to end" sense. In this movie that I had that being President of the United States, you speak with a harshness without Paragon, and more or less tell you that we're going to take by ass.I saw the movie in original version and leave me the eyes of both read all the talk of the good of Al Gore. The movie isn't a movie or a documentary, is a guy giving his students a class. Sometimes photos are videoclipes but the bulk of the movie is the guy giving an eternal charleta. As the bastard talking about fast, did not give time to read anything of what said.Warning: who does not know geography, or a little bit of Economics, to not see this movie will not know anything. The girl that I went to see the movie I wanted to kill because does not understand anything. And is that he must have them well large to make a movie with a guy giving a class in plan rally.Certainly go chalkboard that had Al Gore piece, I imagine the classes in the University with something? All the stats and what you so great so please? It would be amazing, but that is dreaming too, we are in Spain and has not yet come here or the motosilla. I am already imagining some badass joke how to put the picture of goatse in giant size rather than come el profe, hahaha, what we were going to laugh.Finally an acojonante movie from the verb acojonar. A scary of the good movie, because the argument is as follows. The site where we live will become unbreathable in a few years. This is like the movie SAW, where the doll is this descojonando and us is saying, in a few years there will be an arricharrante heat, more tornadoes than ever and hurricanes, water will cover the Earth and there will be millions of displaced persons. Live on Earth as today will be a utopia and will become a nightmare.Global warming of the planet is a reality and Al Gore is going to all sides to communicate that the data of scientists warn us where we're going a tomar por culo. The only that seems to be that they did not hear are the politicians who spend to do nothing and remain locked in their wars stupid that if I said this or another, believing that so going to scratch a few votes to fools.I have always said that this system of politicians only serves to let some hyped at the expense of others. Still living as of yore, where Kings and bourgeois looted the village. And above when we have a real problem that affects everyone, the world does nothing. I don't even think as we're going to organize before a possible alien attack.The human race is a quirk of nature, and I think that what us happening is that we are about to die from success. We are so many that it is difficult to agree. Anyway, I'm still saying the same thing, fuck, fuck, that the world will end.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2377

Pruden Rodríguez

Mediterráneo

muchocine

Highly recommended comedy. Playful tale about a group of forgotten Italian soldiers on a small island in the Aegean that took on their own merits the Oscar for best film from non-English speaking in 1991.

First months of World War II. A small group of Italian soldiers landed on a small island in the Aegean Sea. Strategic importance: zero, enemies in sight: zero, population: a few children, women and old. This approach was presented in 1991 "Mediterranean", film of Gabriele Salvatores which took the Oscar for best film of non-English speaking.Unknown to the general public, this Italian comedy has its strength in simplicity. The argument is simple: forgotten by his own army, held incommunicado and without a goal clear, several soldiers with very different personalities must adapt to the quiet life of the island to find a way to return to Italy. So they spend three years, during which adapt to the quiet of the villagers beat and customs until that are finally presented with the opportunity to return. However, for some of them the life in the middle of the Aegean has marked a before and after.With this simple story Salvatores entertains us for an hour and a half recreating in the pequñeces of every day in the desvariaciones of soldiers somewhat bizarre, something crazy, with strengths and weaknesses very marked. Highlights the character of Sergeant, played masterfully by Diego Abatantuono, as soon as summarizing everything on "is a bitch", as shown understanding and peacemaker to the everyday dilemmas. Perhaps what unites us to the Italians have more likely to feel identified with this squad, so to see them satisfied with your four covered needs (sex, football, food and alcohol) one thinks that we would not really acted very different. But I wonder what thought the Anglo-Saxons, so disciplined and responsible, to see the picturesque panorama showing Salvatores. Laughter, is certainly assured but never find the easy joke. they are their characters, with their actions and reactions, who end up forcing you to have you.It has been said that this film was overrated at the time. It may be. Perhaps its potential is untapped and indeed, despite that I liked, I recognize that it leaves something hanging stories and never just delve into anything in a particular way. Anyway I think is a highly recommended film that also leaves an interesting reflection on the loneliness of the human being, love, and the nonsense about the war in the last minutes. And, of course, leaves us also beautiful images of landscapes to remember. who could miss some time on an island as well!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2113

Bruji

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

Coconut still fail chestnuts. The continuous covenants and betrayals, and the creation of a gay character, constitute undeniable successes of the script. And us continuos with the dog!, cause of my only joy and utmost concern.

Almost as an axiom, the thirds in a series often overcome, often the first, and always the latter. There is a nearby landmark in the return of the King. At the end of the world, beheaded the goose that lays the golden eggs, the apparent existing decompensation between a weak script and the technical virtuosity that accompanies it, clearly miserably. In the background, the consolidation of some undefined characters that already have own name in the history of the seventh art.From the depths, emerging / El Hidalgo of the seas / purge its outstanding debt / with the world in her hands, / anchored the helm, presto / already grasping at lontananza / to the mocking feared / his Majesty of the South seas, / by all known as Captain "Bloom".Embarrassed that feel me Espronceda. The same that arrebolaría to Raoul Walsh (he as well measuring times) before the cluster of absurdities sponsored by the "great" craftsman which is repeated after the cameras. Ay if Michael Curtiz reaching up head!. If Robert Siodmak would have had half of technical possibilities in his time. If Jacques Tourneur had approached the Knightley. If Byron Haskin arrives to find with this cake. What waste of special effects and what an absolute lack of imagination. Will have you heard about the writers of Borden Chase?But let's go by parts. Coconut still fail chestnuts. The continuous covenants and betrayals, and the creation of a gay character, constitute undeniable successes of the script. And us continuos with the dog!, cause of my only joy and utmost concern.That fascinate, the curse of the Black Pearl, pleasantly, surprised. The adventures of approach were ransom of the film abyss; their misadventures, returned to conquer, and the impetus given to the fantasy, unconvinced, did not upset. In this way, we are witnessing excited at the opening of the dead man's chest (or was the other way around?), which, basically, was devoted to disappoint. A unforgivable conception of the script placed the action in three different scenarios for the showcasing of its main protagonists and torture of the Viewer. Out of the cinema, with the boiling cerebellum, few recognized Captain Barbossa... nor to the mother who gave birth.The undersigned, refused to drop moorings and in order to avoid a sinking announced, decided to review both the first two parts, not to be missed on the high seas. He lost and was wrecked. Let's say that, in the end of the world, the scripts are not convoluted, but unintelligible. With a deliberate confusion, profusion and dissemination of ideas, Elliott and Rossio only give option to the enjoyment of a purely visual product. The impressive home is diluted in the Singapore nothing more breeze sail, dives into the immensity of his own plot inconsistency, timidly emerges in the awaited Assembly of brothers and marking course towards fruition, is an insurmountable cliff to navigate.The telescope, now allows glimpse an effects spectacular without limits, wrapped in three endless hours of footage, in which we shopping to find only a small escena-tesoro, two beautiful images and three phrases that not I refuse to mention.The first of these, sent to the director: "Do you think that it has everything planned or it will be improvising on the fly?". The second, reserved for the outcome: "the world is still the same, but with less incentives". And the third, which does credit to Depp: "no cause is lost while a foolish willing to fight for it is". Poor Johnny!, main object of the tribute carried out on fantasy. Worse is offered to the Little Mermaid, with that huge goddess Calypso imitating the bubble, I say, the Ursula the sea witch.The scene is none other than the Emersion of the Dutch Errante. and her brand new Admiral. Images, a floating currency and that boat, a cloak of stars which, in absolute silence, crosses the sea. Movie fan memory drags us to the relaxing spacecraft Kubrick Waltz, and a hasty assessment: in the end of the world, do nor spreads the sound?.With regard to the distribution, copy of my previous criticism. Excellent Geoffrey Rush. Orlando, a delicacy. It would not be fair that Jack Sparrow preserve the actor, to the detriment of the magnificent interpretations obtained under the orders of Tim Burton. And Keira Knightley, technically perfect, but with an alarming lack of chloride of sodium in vein. I would add that the hat of china sit very well, and stress the successful performances of Stellan Skarsgard (Goya of Milos Forman) and Keith Richards (of the Rolling Stones guitarist).And no, not I was in the cinema to see the "after from" farewell false final credit titles. This, that every week pirated it the time, refuses to write about a quarter. Clear that, by 9 a real 8... who knows?.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3936

Ramón Balcells

American Gangster

muchocine

It is told with such enthusiasm and at times it is so frenzied that one provides, not only as a story extremely accomplished, but also as something absolutely credible and incredible at the same time. A real achievement.

Francis Ford Coppola reinvented the mafia with the undisputed masterpiece the Godfather film. We could say that after this trilogy made globally famous, little they had to see the new cinematographic incursions into the mafia with such films. I.e., not repeated such quality or such success as Coppola was achieved, although some that another wonder of the genus deserving not be forgotten, as the recent infiltrators or Eastern Promises (have not seen Scarface, recorded). And as a stroke of luck, at the end of a year as mediocre as it has been the 2007 comes a marvel called American Gangster, Ridley Scott's first official foray into the world of the mafia. And what RAID! It is a truly vibrant, fascinating film one of those experiences you can't miss. It is told with such enthusiasm and at times it is so frenzied that one provides, not only as a story extremely accomplished, but also as something absolutely credible and incredible at the same time. And therefore, there is no doubt that this is a new unforgettable sample of good cinema of mafias. A real achievement.Probably has a fairly obvious weakness is that their excessive duration does not allow to end round as a masterpiece. It contains scenes that could exclude perfectly, thus creating an even more enjoyable film and not so loaded with so many details. Despite this, Scott manages a frenetic pace and scenes that are memorable and as fast as the assault on the rule of drugs or exciting as the meeting between Frank Lucas and Richie Roberts at the exit of the Church (probably one of the best movie scenes of last year). And say that everything is sustained under a screenplay by Steven Zaillian very correct, although too loaded of unnecessary moments and characters. But is that, as in all great film, situations and characters that appear are many and varied, with two protagonists of contrary ideas that dominate this cage of crickets (or drugs) named Harlem. Above all, it is a film exciting, full of life and with excellently written dialogues, these remove the hat (located, above all,) at its final stretch. And it is possibly American Gangster containing one of the endings not smarter surprise and master of recent years, including epic. Everything in this movie is rather bombastic, yet contain small personal sections as detective Roberts divorce or Lucas's relationship with his wife. The issue of drugs, however, does not show as a backdrop, and that is a big plus. Perhaps the film does not contain too many scenes related to the fateful situation of persons addicted, but we are of course which is a terrible Vice and note as in the 1970s drugs was a key point in American society. Terrible, but true.Nevertheless, the two main characters are the focus of the film. And, without a doubt, there couldn't be better choice than Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe (two actors as the top of a pine). His performances are simply impressive, seem drawn from the reality. And is that in many ways American Gangster was close to reality (unforgettable last dialogue between Lucas and his mother). They may perhaps appear topical, as if basic portraits of gangster and police were added without further and did not have not a shred of originality, but I assure you that if one is careful, it has little to see Frank Lucas with any other mobster seen in the film. Since then, Washington gives us a role exceptional, full of charisma and hard character, with a kind of transformation towards at the end that definitely excludes it gangster model. This is, without doubt, an authentic American Gangster, with personality and little recognizable hidden facets. It is a real character. And Richie Roberts, masterfully characterized by a superb Russell Crowe that has little to do with Lucas's sadistic mind. This is an honest man (perhaps too), with quite clear ideas and gross to say enough is enough. It may also seem the typical inspector of police of most film, but some of their dialogues and, above all, that keeps the end with the gangster, are so memorable and different than accustomed we are to see that it distances itself from the basic model of divorced hard to peel. The side are all very correct, but do not reach the high level of interpretation of the two protagonists.A film master, close and frenetic. Nothing pretentious social Chronicle and that can be described as grandiose, exciting and narrativamente perfect. However, its excessive length prevents to reach the masterpiece that could have been. And to round off, two performances worthy of an Oscar each one and a no less brilliant direction. I hope that over the years he will be remembered as the authentic (now modern) classic that is.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2049

Txapulin

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Spider-Man 3 is a tart of colors with beautiful special effects. I know, I'm not saying anything new.

Spider-Man 3 is a tart of colors with beautiful special effects. I know, I'm not saying anything new. The other two movies were basically the same, only that it loses any developments. My main problem with this saga is that I do not swallow to the main character. Agree, Peter Parker is an anti-hero: a shy, ducks and pazguato genius using his suit high-tech to tie the girl from the movie. With that profile, all geek self-respecting, like me, we should worship the character, but is, in addition, Parker an integral asshole. There is no way of matching. There is no possible empathy. One looks forward to that bad loading once the man Spider to avoid having to see the niñato totontolculo in the next scene. This conception of the character is passable in the first installment, where something can be interpreted as an irónico-cachonda eccentricity of the director. But in the two following games, the character not only not evolving, but is increasingly foolish in unbearable. And it seems that the director takes it seriously. The truth is that a consistent finish would have been Spider-man and his girlfriend die crushed by a giant Flyswatter, and so us we ahorrábamos the fourth.Even so, this third installment is better that the second, and this is thanks to the bad guys. We presagiábamos to finish watching the second a total fiasco by the reappearance of the new Goblin, but the truth is that James Franco gets to give charisma to Harry Osborn in this installment. Then, both Sandman com Venom, although little exploited, are achieved. Otherwise only is saved if you only look at the spectacular action scenes and special effects, which are at the height of the money spent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1209

Plissken

Apocalypto

muchocine

Apocalypto is magnificent and deranged proof that Mel Gibson is about to become a character who likes to Werner Herzog.

If I were the woman or one of the children of Mel Gibson, it staying nothing quiet at night. This type makes already some time has crossed a line internal will that probably not be measured in every day just as in the film directed by. Because if the film is a psychological mirror of a director, 'The passion of the Christ' glimpse of the fundamentalism of a fanatic, and 'Apocalypto' it returns the image of a hallucinating wild dominated by primary instincts. And still they ask to be politically correct. 'Apocalypto' narrates the initiatory journey of Jaguar claw, a young Hunter who lives in a small village at an undetermined time in the pre-Columbian period. The powerful Mayan Warriors break into his life, sweeping everything in its path and capturing him as a slave. Jaguar claw will face a thousand dangers and their own fear to win the right to return to their forest.And with one premise in principle so weak and so hackneyed, what get Mel Gibson is immerse ourselves fully, as rarely before, done in a frantic struggle for survival. The word that best defines the spirit of the film is furious, and does not mask it, on the contrary. The alibi of the primitivism of the time allows Gibson get the worst of himself as person, probably, but well above that the best of himself as a filmmaker: Gibson turns what could have been another 'The emerald jungle' or 'in quest for fire' (worthy but too virtuous) in a story being that seems to spot by a shaman in the light of the fire in a cavern.In addition, the narrative virtues are multiplied by nervous digital photography Dean Semler (not by chance also responsible for 'Mad Max 2' and 'Mad Max 3') and the overwhelming Assembly of Kevin Stitt and John Wright, while so criticized anachronisms are minimized by the incredible design of production of Tom Sanders. All technical aspects scratch more at a very high level, taking into account that 'Apocalypto' was shot in natural settings in Mexico, with the difficulties that this implies.And the big question which was about the movie was the interpretations. Gibson was decided at the end by amateur actors to respond to the type needed each, and have to congratulate him on it. Perfectly defines it Max Renn in its correct analysis in Videodrome, "[...]" a few so real actors seem fused in his characters [.] "." If outside little, not limited to outlining a confrontation "wild good vs." "bad savages", but which may even find nuances in one and another side, always within the limits of what it is, an action film.As only possible failures, the historical inaccuracy, that may be offensive to defenders more stale academicism, and the simplicity of the plot, which is in turn one of their great strengths: when a jaguar and a dozen of headhunting Chase you through the jungle, is little space for philosophical delicacies.Beyond interpretations that can be (and that of always invent), 'Apocalypto' is magnificent and deranged proof that Mel Gibson is about to become a character who likes to Werner Herzog. 9.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3258

Silvia Giner

53 días de invierno

muchocine

Absolutely dismal social realist film. It is the best option to go directly to the psychiatrist to ask a good dose of prozac. Certainly the intention of the Director "that cold soul cale you" is achieved.

"If you give up in winter, you've lost spring, summer and autumn".Absolutely dismal social realist film. It is the best option to go directly to the psychiatrist to ask a good dose of prozac. Certainly the intention of the Director "that cold soul cale you" is achieved. I'm particularly not fond of this film genre, I always say that to see outside misfortunes already I have the news and so my soul was cale, my own life and the things that I want to. This type of film is unnecessary and contributes to the engricesimiento of society. In addition the only thing memorable isn't Mercedes Sampietro. That ugly actors, mother of God who so depressing that grey decorádos more absolute. The script will be very winning but love to Jesus Christ that the film cannot be more bodriosa and more sad. Actresses with greasy hair and bad hair (intention I guess to emphasize further the deprimencia) and Silvia Munt wrinkled as a dump of the carrefour and silicone lips getting ready to burst. The interpretation by known actors (Mercedes, Silvia.) very well and some secondary to vomit.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1453

Francisco Bellón

Manuale D'Amore 2

muchocine

Perfect example of failed and unnecessary sequel. Those who enjoyed and mondaron of laughter with the first Manuale d'amore, the best recommendation we can do them is staying farther away possible of its sequel.

In this life in which appear the originality and innovation in the arts to sin, increasingly tends to find simpler ways, going to theoretically safe. In the film, that becomes remakes, remakes or adaptations, and an endless list of sequels, prequels, spin-off. etc. Producers, in their quest for greater benefits with the least amount of possible risks, try to continue exploiting the goose that lays the golden eggs, but what happens when not of more than itself?Manuale d'amore has been one of the cooler comedies and originals that have been made in recent years, not only in Italy or Europe, and it became a success. Its main virtue was that classics, with four chapters which analysed that mystery called love recovering the spirit of Italian comedies of episodes. Less than two years later, Giovanni Veronesi offers four new episodes, without apparent relationship between itself, except for the connection of a radio program. In honor of the truth, Manuale d'amore 2 is a perfect example of failed and completely unnecessary sequel. This continuation lacks the grace and originality of its predecessor, and its various episodes become empty and boring to an extent that clears the tedium. Humor is scarce on the tape, and soon there is not the elegance and finesse of the original, but is crude, crossing the line of bad taste on several occasions. Veronesi is a serious mistake, and is to leave on several occasions the comedy to one side and try to tell the story from a nearest to tear drama point of view to something else. This garrafal bug note in the first episode, but especially in the third, the most unfortunate of all saying is step. Only the actors put some light into the abyss Manuale D'Amore 2, notably Carlo Verdone, not in vain is considered by many as the heir of the great Alberto Sordi. Those who enjoyed and mondaron of laughter with the first Manuale d'amore, the best recommendation we can do them is staying farther away possible of its sequel. This continuation is a comedy without grace, coarse and dull, by so strongly recommend saving the entry, and enjoy the pleasant taste that left the original.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3220

Alvaro Oliva

El Orfanato

muchocine

Do not know if?The orphanage? You'll end up representing us in the final phase of the Oscars, but already you are booting applause by half the world, and making national viewers prefer for a movie Spanish, and that is an achievement.

Juan Antonio Bayona made his debut in the feature film in the best possible way, with success among critics and public. Seconded and supported by Guillermo del Toro, "The orphanage" presents a story which is known to us: mother in a gigantic House of field, where there are strange and with children of medium. Yes, it may seem very typical, but the success of Bayonne and yours, is that they make us believe what we are seeing and identifying us with its protagonist, Bethlehem Rueda.La actress Gets the weight of the film on his shoulders and get, not only not fall, but lift with her arms, that performs an interpretation that already sounds like one of the best of the year.The story has been written by Sergio g. Sánchez, and Bayonne has been transformed into images, leaves us wonderful prints at the same time as terrifying, that while not abuse of scares and shocks, there is more than one that will make viewers to vibrate in their seats.All aspects deserve to stand out, the set of the film has an impeccable invoice, but where to get win the public is with feelings that follow those actors. It should be special attention Roger Princep, Simon, who with little age manages to give freshness and naturalness to situations, and even more, to make us believe that the character of Belén Rueda has really lost his son and will strive to recover it.I don't know if "The orphanage" will end up representing us in the final phase of the Oscars, but either way, you are already booting applause by half the world, making national viewers prefer a film by Spanish, and that is something that as it stands the landscape, is an achievement.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2998

Bruji

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Do we deal with a hyphen? open?, understood as such, one that, offering multiple possibilities, always ends up happening that does not cover the minimum expectations of the viewer moderately critical.

Thrilling fast-paced action and an abundance of special effects impossible is the attractive offer of this spectacular Ribbon of Tony Scott. A few accurate claims seeking to remedy the evident fragility of his script, cut from a bright idea, he strives and manages to land anywhere. Fund, a tribute to the people of New Orleans and the Hollywood call things by their real name fear: Desidia.Es possible that lovers are the beings that majority of "déjà vu" reached experience throughout our lives. Blame it on too many producers, filmmakers and, above all, writers contemporary who, in the absence of their own ideas, do not hesitate resort to old tricks that others operated them in the past. When these events occur, the criticism agrees unanimously described as resulting Mannerism as "wink" or as "plagiarism", normally, according to the name of the director who signs the film. There are always exceptions, see the case of Brian de Palma, which still have not been agreed.History before us, American critics found cinematographic references from the mythical Laura of Otto Preminger. A fact that I do not entretendré for obvious reasons: nor Tony Scott cares a pepper the arguments of his films, nor to me either. Its peculiar universe is based on other aspects. "I think it was Robert Altman who said that the current film was the closest thing to a video-clip, clear, not told anyone."If you knew that not going to believe commenting on an unintelligible argument to which you yourself do not find meaning, what would? "." To follow the designs of the movie, my answer is "so he would try". An arduous task if we take into account that we are facing a "open" script, understood as such, one that, offering multiple possibilities, it always ends up happening that does not cover the minimum expectations of the viewer moderately critical. I only wonder what size would the stone thrown into the River, capable of achieving not only that it lost its channel, but also to move the continent. It is too cruel to ask the writers of Disney's learn to discern between travel in time and flights on carpet, but? I said-that should not be so difficult to put together a story that they themselves have decomposed. Did those responsible for back to the future, those of the passengers of the result Tiempo.El is a product close to the delirious The Jacket of John Maybury, who neither understands the protagonist, or the public, or the luminaries that guarantees the libretto.I must stress that Tony Scott all this cares the same as to me the bobbin lace, i.e. absolutely nothing. Filmmaker still struggling to overcome his agoraphobia film, and it is that every time you wheel in open spaces, makes sure to enclosures to cal and singing with an infinite number of architectural elements, sometimes non-existent in the own level, to ensure that the viewer has the feeling of having been swallowed by a fireplace. That is why the list of the members of the artistic direction of this film is endless.With that and everything, I like this degree in fine arts, as a simple matter of empathy: if I were to shoot a scene in bed, would also make it to three millimeters of actors, more than anything, to fray the nerves of those who saw the film. When he does, it is impossible to distinguish a nose a hand or anything else. Even has a foolproof trick to mislead those who enjoy a special visual acuity: take fog. Also does film prudery?.What it does have is certainly Lair to its beginnings. Do to make a video clip to George Michael, discovered that a handsome man with sunglasses, becomes interesting and, since then, has not ceased to repeat the invention: Tom Cruise in Top Gun, Kevin Costner in Revenge, Denzel in the fire of the Venganza.Dentro of the cast (excellent casting), we find ourselves with a Val Kilmer? with the face of loaf - which continues to believe the asterisk (long left to shine) "talent only surpassed by the number of zeros ()"(a_la_derecha) from your bank account "(this he said Robert de Niro). With a pretty girl (does it matter its name?), with the charming Denzel, that I cannot speak objectively (I like too) and Jim (sometimes James) Caviezel, who refuses to accept roles that include sex scenes, but don't mind being the terrorist that sent to 543 people (my entire village) at a better life. Curious vision of Catholicism!.For his opposition to the Bush administration, Robert Altman, the last rebel, had serious difficulties to finance his latest films. A problem that is familiar to directors such as Oliver Stone or Spike Lee. Therefore it is not surprising that the conjunction Scott - Bruckheimer has produced this convoluted bullshit to avoid having to say that the tragedy of New Orleans clearly demonstrated the apathy of a more concerned Government in abarrer outside homes to sweep his own.In any case, "Satán reason as a man, Dios thinks on eternity" and this is a production of unmarriageable and director script "agorafóbico", candoroso and videoclipero that, however, it manages to entertain. An important merit.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2406

Tito Chinchan

Operación Stormbreaker

muchocine

Action movie teen that like to older. It can be seen perfectly, to mix large doses of action with interesting dialogues within very short time. Highly recommended to pour the cool afternoon in this incipient summer.

This summer comes strong with regard to blockbuster films, those of popcorn and flat encefalogramas. Not usual that we find so much supply, that really makes you doubt on what to see. And above all it is not usual that a movie with an adolescent protagonist, focused on a broad spectrum of viewers, is entertaining and fun like this.The film is about a teenager of 14 years (some more I would say) that has a guy that the considered boring. It is soon discovered that it is dull guy is a secret agent of MI6, and upon his death, the young Alex has to deal with a mission. Apparently, secretly his uncle had taught him various disciplines of spy. Specifically, the task is to know what is hidden behind the new personal supercomputer that will come out to the market.Amazing movie, by Jove. You know that when you do not expect anything, because you look at always favorably. We can say that we we have a new James Bond with acne and hormones to fertilize a haren. Lots of vibrant action, fun inventions and characters that hooked. The characterization of the characters deserve a special mention, since you see that they are clearly focused on a teenager, but rather demanding audience. The bad guys are diabolical and evil, but very tontorrones objectives (as well as superfeos). The good are prototypical, with a head of MI6 which gives much laughter.In short, action film teenage that appeal to older. It can be seen perfectly, to mix large doses of action with interesting dialogues within very short time. Highly recommended to pour the cool afternoon in this incipient summer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1244

Yojimbo

My date with Drew

muchocine

The documentary is rife with humor, enviable admiration and a rhythm.

There are some exercises which are a perfect example of ingenuity and creativity against economy. And the ves when you know that you can say "with skill get do something just broke".Brian Herzlinger is a 27 year old who can't find work and since childhood is a fan of Drew Barrymore. He was a member of her fan club, has always followed his career? and thanks to its name and a phrase that she said are encouraged to perform and document in video, with two friends, seeming impossible: stay with her. Hence the title of this documentary: My date with Drew.Pues well, in 30 days and $1100 (you have to see the documentary to find out the reasons for these curious constraints of "production") will try to stay with her, so it will be asking people to meet industry people to get in contact with her. The result? As in life, is the journey the interesting thing, the fun, the gratifying?The documentary is rife with humor, enviable admiration and a rhythm. It is real as life itself and is a wonderful trip and reflection of what many ilusionamos and some reach achieved with certain initiatives. Also browse between the waters of the "fanaticism", of the "fetishization" of people dedicated to showy work and socially known as actors. Sometimes it is inevitable to feel embarrassed of the protagonist, who comes to be depressed for the results you are getting and that allows something like inform an actress interferes in their lives.Even so, it is a documentary full of life, of illusion but not which can stay in good intentions. It is a reflection of how with little money, good friends and great enthusiasm can get things like this, which may be questionable, but which are so personal as non-transferable.I partly feel identified because, although I was lucky to meet professionals who I admire, never occurred to me documenting as Brian. And that there are many, many, many reasons to do something similar to what he has done here.On their website you can see more material. At the moment it isn't edited in our country, but if what you seek well cyberspace you you can find.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2567

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Gritos y susurros

muchocine

Masterful film exercise: impressive catalogue of emotions, perfect interpretation....

I did not understand cries and whispers when I saw her for the first time and perhaps now not been reached, in depth, understand the film speech by Ingmar Bergman, their panoramic devastating pain and death. There are occasions in which seems boring and tiresome of the history of the cinema director and others where it is inevitable admire his talent, and conclude with certainty that it is one of the major filmmakers of the 20th century: which raises lit adhesions and causing maintained yawns.I myself to watch Bergman movies when I read that Woody Allen so admired. He came to Kurosawa in the same way. I also so heard Bach with interest when I knew Keith Jarrett, pianist that he supervised undertaken in my income in bartkowiak jazz in the mid-1980s, it had as their favorite music. These things tend to happen: one reads a tale of Cortázar, stays took and want to read the complete works. He is marked up a term. At the beginning, in honor of the Holy truth, not I saw in the films of Swedish director nothing to wake up my astonishment.Cries and whispers is the story of a woman that matrix cancer devastates and beautiful still life family who entertains his last days consisting of two sisters and a maid. In the wrong hands, barrunto that this episode of absolutely dramatic dyes could have billed a film of sensitive but banked involuntarily to yellow, to true impudor show pain as if cuasierótico were of an object. In this case, Bergman makes a sober study of pain, a visual document that cuts the sleeping modernized vision of the spectator, in excess fueled by narrative solutions of less intensity. Faith, the death and isolation, the major issues of the Bergman, appear here, but aren't written with the metaphysical incontinence of yesteryear. What is told here is the evolution of the disease, the oppression of the family Palace, red as compulsion to the soul. Bergman goes from reality to fantasy, the imperturbable present to the past as propeller which still actuation mechanisms of the frustration and the visible conflict. Women escorting Agnes to death are also dead, cast, bereft of all vital breath and admitted in a grey tenebrism, able to make emerge secret hatred, wickedness, the foundations of fear to confront the vision and the existence of the other, albeit the sister, which has grown in its interior and has made all the vicissitudes of life in a single page of a newspaper.Bergman films with Audacity the faces of their heroines dead, women doomed to silence and the glittering splendor of a bourgeois life seeking no spiritual happiness. Cries and whispers is a stark journey to the heart of disenchantment: there is no love, there is no humanity in these spectral characters exude misery who exhibit behaviour typical of those who have lost everything and know that they will never recover as crave. The review of the tape has hurt as before he did: perhaps makes that the subliminal or blatantly explicit message, I dunno, Bergman: the offer of a neat inventory of emotions only translatable if age or experience of the spectator has the appropriate reading instruments. I imagine that if I give you a third revision in thirty years I will find new meanings: good cinema is this, the luxurious possibility that every film is different everytime we face to it. The good movies or good literature or good music, art, ultimately.Photography just deserving Oscar at the ceremony of 1972: Sven Nykvist, usual Bergman, apabulló the jury with his genius in creating oppressive atmosphere.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3981

Oscar Martínez

Interview

muchocine

The idea, despite being a remake, never ceases to be equally bold and the effort that both actors play is truly commendable, giving the viewer truly brilliant moments and categorical dialogues.

Directed by Steve Buscemi and starring Sienna Miller and own actor, Interview is the first installment of the review of a series of three films carried out by the late Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh.En she Pierre Peders, a reporter of war with international reputation but now low hours, is it has hardened seeing greater unimaginable horrors committed by men. One day your editor forced to interview Katya, the most famous American soap operas star in the world. Offended, humiliated, lowered, Pierre gets in contact with Katya to do the job, convinced that it will be an absurd interview more unimportant, but it is confused at all, since his encounter with the woman bring you more than one surprise. Pierre discovers that under glamour, whim and luxury that it surrounds, there is a woman intelligent, sharp wit, and like him, with hundreds of scars and recesses. Between the two they begin spinning a relationship full of traps, sharp criticism, sexual tension and lucid reflections above all and above all.Conceived and embodied as an interpretative duel led under theatrical guidance, Interview is a funny and entertaining exercise in appearances in which dialogue between its two protagonists puts with difference the way: with the loft of the actress, and (almost) exclusive scenario with the only help of three digital cameras the film directed by Steve Buscemi is served solely on the acuity of their sentences to keep the viewer's attention during their just 86 minutes of duration.The idea, despite being a remake, never ceases to be equally bold, especially if we take into account that the CGI claim seems increasingly more impresincindible to be someone at the box office, and the effort that both actors play is truly commendable, giving the viewer truly brilliant moments and categorical dialogues.Unfortunately, sometimes Interview is guilty of being too innocent: certain sequences will seem a too artificial and forced and some of their twists - included the final outcome - are somewhat predictable. Despite this, the film directed and starring Steve Buscemi gives us a pleasant viewing, always entertaining and interesting, a way of doing diametralemnte opposed to which you often find us in Billboard, and this only fact worth our respect.As you would expect, Steve Buscemi interpretativamente eats a dutiful Sienna Miller, but whose career seems to approach it both to his role in Interview, ending its likelihood resulting rather odious. Personally, I would highlight the opening sequence in the restaurant, where the guidelines to be followed by the film and where both actors are superb translating their respective characters are marked.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/686

Silvia

Scoop

muchocine

Despite the shortcomings, it must be acknowledged that the New York director films outweigh the majority of comedies as regards quality is concerned and is logical that with so many movies out of your imagination, not all become masterpieces.

The new annual installment of the great Woody Allen is already from today on our screens, at the same time coinciding with the release of the DVD of Match Point. To then say that intellectuals do not have business vision.This time Allen abandons the drama and recovers its most comical classical aspect to which we are accustomed. But although some situations scoop reminiscent of other comedies of the director as a mysterious murder in Manhattan or the curse of the Jade Scorpion, the new film is years light of those hilarious comedies.In this case, the comical point it monopolizes the character played by the same director, who gets into the skin of a flamboyant magician a journalism student who helps solve a murder case. The character played by Woody Allen, far from causing laughter has the risk of falling into the constant caricature, a histrionics that can be tired for the Viewer. Similarly, Scarlett Johanson seems to sit him better the facet of seductive to the Strip.The argument continues to be a thriller, in this case tinged comic film. Sondra Pransky (Scarlett Johansson) is an American journalism student found in Britain visiting some friends. During his stay in London, he attends a magic show, where the magician makes him climb onto the stage to perform one of his tricks in which she should disappear. While Sondra is waiting to "dismantle", is visited by the ghost of a deceased reporter, which will give you the scoop of the year. The spirit reveals Peter Lyman, the rich and attractive son of a well-known British Aristocrat, is leading a double life as "Murderer of the Tarot", a serial killer who takes time terrorizing the country. With the help of the magician, Sondra begins to investigate the news and get together some evidence incriminating against Lyman. The more aware, more dangerous becomes research, especially when he begins to fall in love of the attractive alleged murderer.Despite the fact that as usual the Director the argument resolved without abruptly at the end, in this case falls into predictable, something which subtract interest to the film during his viewing. In the same way, dialogs, strong point of the director, are in this case rather loose except for some brilliant phrase.An aspect to be highlighted in the film is the lesson of good investigative journalism that brings the director in the film by the character of Scarlett Johanson. Throughout the film is show us that a journalist must or must not do to get truthful information. The student must make efforts to deeply investigate the murder case to demonstrate that it has an exclusive on the authorship of the crime.The Allen obsession with the subject of death returns to be present in this film, as usual, in a comic way. Death is depicted as a trip by boat captained by a hooded with Scythe. The director often ironize about death because in the background it frightens. In an interview with the Sunday of El Periódico de this same Saturday, Allen confesses: "I terrified aging, because approaching me death, which scares me." Perhaps that is why I River both of it. "I've always thought that as more fear gives something, funniest are the jokes you can do on this topic."But despite the shortcomings, we must recognize that the New York director films outweigh the majority of comedies as regards quality is concerned and is logical that with so many movies out of your imagination, not all become masterpieces.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2054

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La fuente de la vida

muchocine

Daunting romantic manifesto between science fiction and romantic melodrama. He loses because it is very ambitious and WINS our hearts because it is very ambitious.

Although it contains some of the most brilliant scenes lately I have seen in a movie theater, the source of life is a spectacular hodgepodge of metaphysics, melodrama and science fiction, may, in the effort to please in all three, not content at all in any. The love story between Izzy and Tom (splendid Rachel Weisz and Hugh Jackman) is a masterful portrait of love beyond death, beyond of adversity and over time. Conqueror, scientist and astronaut conspire to reach the source of life, the tree, pre-Columbian, telluric and transcendental. The Visual excesses escorting the fantasy of Aranofsky excuse: is not possible to be as ambitious and not fall into the ridiculous. And the film has ruborosos moments, you pictures too naïve that lowered the admirable precision of a montage and arriesgadísima narrative proposed: three times, three arguments, three looks towards a single point: the dance of death and the dazzling impulse of life. Death is a disease, says Tom / Hugh Jackman when he sees his beloved dying. Death is an act of creation, says Izzy / Rachel Weisz elsewhere apart from the film. On these two ideas flows the source of life, film that appreciates its excessive not footage (hour and a half) and his firmness in the plastic reconstruction of an obsession. Aronofsky has been eight years after this project. Us, even demanding, not can withdraw the point of wit and talent, vocation rupture, built-up megalomania so the viewer attends a different function, where raw the fragility of feelings, the unrestrained romantic love story which is last of the film Foundation, because this source of life is above all a tragic love storya monument plastically irreproachable passion over time and space. As the film it is a factory of dreams, the tape itself, once finished and lit the lights, turns into a dream. One runs the corridor lit, machine-gunned of kids who shout the points that vomit the Martians killed, capping, embebecido, troubled, simply overwhelmed. No matter that the movie is a good movie: is not, at all, a masterpiece. It doesn't matter that reasoned, repensada cold, as he likes to this passionate scribe, is report them avoidable, broken fractures that could have been amended with less majestic seams. Because if this freak is guilty of something, it's Majesty. I, back home, I think the tree of life, in the Maya, a dark laboratory where three exegetes of the faith have been converted in scientists and interstellar space. It will that: the film is an oratorio, a piece about love and his escape, death and the efforts of the soul Symphony human understand it or deny it. None of this is feasible. At the end, as in the film, we asentimos, we let ourselves be crucified by the wind.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2890

Rafa Marin

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

Len Wiseman (from Underworld and its sequel), self-confessed fan of the series, delivers a quarter, as it stands today the world of action cinema, it almost seems a masterpiece.

Live a revival of old and tired heroes, perhaps because Hollywood, meanwhile teenager, so blast and both argument without rhyme or reason has not been able to find characters (or actors) that give the baton to men of action of fifteen or twenty years ago (has said I do not know what top model that same thing happens in your area)Perhaps because Hollywood is beginning to see the Wolf ears and is a good way to attract the cinemas spectators who already comb canas or, as the case of Bruce Willis, a.k.a. John McLane, already not comb them. A lot of years have passed since John McTiernan gave a new interpretation to the hero of the shirt and the blood pouring (in many respects McLane is the baroque of the Renaissance which marked Indy), and it shows not only how the film has evolved or regressed in its grammar, eaten more and more the ground by the strongest arguments and more malleable television characters, but in everything what has fallen as then to human beings. The shadow of 11-S, that is today commemorated by the way, has greatly affected the means of mass communication, and yes I admit that it is not over with the power of the superhero in the world of the comic, as I came to believe six years ago, has that covered a patina inability and even alienation between Nintendo and painful any approach to the theme of the terrorist attacksorganizations in the shade and hardened heroes who win battles themselves when we see that there are battles that cannot win nor the most powerful army in the world. It is the shadow of the 11-S which causes Bond to become more "realistic" and less fanciful, nothing else. We have seen McLane in Los Angeles between airports, and on the streets of New York. Now, recovering some video game heritage, City happens in city as Super Mario could move from screen on screen, greatests are all means of transport that can survive and bleeding. They say that in original version its vocabulary contains enough, but in the dub of Ramón Langa (and recognize that without him for us Bruce Willis is not Bruce Willis) not a hair cut. Director Len Wiseman (from Underworld and its sequel), self-confessed fan of the series, delivers a quarter, as it stands today the world of action cinema, it almost seems a masterpiece. Presents a tired but combative, McLane aged, without family (his ex-wife is in San Francisco, his son does not know anything, and his daughter studies in New York and wants nothing of it; it is not strange to assume that Lucy, that inherits many features of his father, has also had an encontroanazo with MOM Gennero - by what "Jenaro" in Spanish? - and has decided to become independent studying at the other end of the country). Expelled from a desectructurada family, McLane barely has a line of dialogue to acknowledge that his heroic are very distant past, and from their 15 seconds of glory he has returned to his work as normal police not found with cases as glamorous as those who they know. The movie entertains, the computer not annoying sidekick (no, isn't Wesley Crusher, thank God), the piece of paper of Kevin Smith doing the only thing it does not at odds, the bad has the packaging which unfortunately lacks the bad (a Timothy Oliphant (which is much more disturbing to doing "good" in Deadwood than here of bad and also lasts from McLane time not finish say yipikahei). Computer trouble are explained enough that us we create them as well with the condescending sonrisita, and although Mclane not de jure and perjure in Aramaic Yes are some politically incorrect moment (punching Mai Lihn, fix you, settled with a tuft of hairs that boot you to the beast). Interestingly, the perception of authority has changed in this new film. Ill still belong to various European countries, a somewhat xenophobic feature of the previous films that arrived even to emphasize his entrance onstage with the Ode to joy, lest we forget, it is also the anthem of the EU. But this time the terrorist is home, and more House, the very core of the club of the guards. Interestingly, for the terrorists who faces Mclane there never the ideology, but the economic motivation. Also, for the first time, bureaucrats and bosses of the FBI are not presented as a useless calzonazos. There are ups and downs of pace every time that they stop to take a breath (and McLane, at this stage, and it is good that it is, you have to stop to take a breath much) and change of vehicle and give explanations. But it is that a graph and so prodigious as the original movie script is now impossible. The virtuous of the clashes of McLane has been replaced by motorized spectacular. There are a couple of very good times: the fight in the elevator, the persecution watered abandoned cars Highway, and the auction against a F-35.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1656

Tito Chinchan

Admitido

muchocine

Youth film about some kids who create their own University. They do not have hilarious moments, or take advantage of the potential that could be, but can be seen. Video store meat.

It looks that these American student comedietas rarely me like. All this roll American Pie find it me boring, and is American humor (except the Scary Movie type) I do not get. To say that one only I am amused when the girl said "Music Camp got the flute pussy" I tell everything about this type of film. But as I am brave, I myself therefore to see this, only because I owe to my public.The film is about a somewhat void, but clever, student is not admitted in any of the eight universities to which chooses. To avoid facing their parents, get an orondo buddy makes a very realistic web page on a fictional University, where if it is admitted. To finish the farce, with a few not admitted, they rent an abandoned building (a former psychiatric hospital) and give aspect of University. But things get complicated when hundreds of misfits and not admitted occur, upon payment of the registration, the supposed University.Well, well, what most curious movie, of those that adorn the shelves of the closest video shops. History is not bad, it is original but rather incongruous. Develops through semi normal channels, only that the thing loses the North, reaching the peak in a subrealista trial that I was not interested, nor to me towards the end. The cast of actors, well what is expected of a tape of these, very prototypical. Although the idea of creating a University, say that special, I thought it was very funny and I liked. Although the final outcome of the work I did not at all.In short, youth film about some kids who create their own University. They do not have hilarious moments, or take advantage of the potential that could be, but can be seen. Video store meat.If there is material and interest, why not leave mancebos and mancebas in leather?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1084

Oscar Cantero

María Antonieta

muchocine

Sofia Coppola portrays the 18th century society and the life of Marie Antoinette from a different point of view. And it does so with subtlety.

If there is someone in the world of cinema that we can say that he descended from a family with tradition, this is Sophia Coppola. Daughter of the Union between Eleanor Coppola and famed director Francis Ford Coppola, Sofia is the clearest demonstration that can be a great figure daughter and have a talent, the less, similar to that which comes from. It is true that the identity of his parents and his family (the infamous Nicolas Cage is his cousin) may have paved you the way, but there is no doubt that this girl has an innate talent for the interpretation and, above all, for the address. Sofia Coppola, who like curious started film being the baby that appears in the Godfather (directed by his father in 1972), shows labour to work that deserves a place among the great, and is increasingly closer make Francis Ford is known for being the father of Sofia Coppola, and not Sophia the daughter of Francis. Obviously, the film tells the story of Marie Antoinette, who with only fourteen years was betrothed to the future King Louis XVI, in a marriage that would be carried out when she was nineteen years. This film aims to show the most human part of a woman that the story has been portrayed as a quasi mythical being, and do it with an own sensitivity of female, but at the same time without losing the perspective of an undeniable historical reality. Its performers reach a great level, aided no doubt by the excellent leadership that exploits to the maximum the great script of the own Coppola. Ultimately, an innovative vision of an historical epoch that is sure will not leave indifferent to almost no one, and will wake up the reactions, favorable or contrary of the majority of fans to the cinema or the modern history of our continent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/477

Illaq

La noche de los girasoles

muchocine

All development, as life itself, is based on chance: things come them the characters because, precisely at that time, they passed through there.

I have already said on other occasions that my "criticisms" are rather comments, although, of course, a commentary on a work necessarily implies a critique (therefore I assume the title). And it is that I find it difficult to criticize something that I do not know to do. On the other hand, I do not know for sure what the intention of the person in charge, which I have to bring me to work a little on tiptoe. Having said that, the first thing that occurred to me to go see the night of the sunflowers was ask me that I wanted to tell me Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo in his first largomentraje. As well, something said: "the night of the sunflowers is a black film in a rural mountain setting but is also a film of characters." Half thriller, half drama, has the Peripeteia of eight main characters around a made dramatic will be complicating the history and which will be involving them successively to each of them. the film is structured in six chapters:?The man of motel?,?The cavers?,?The man in the road?,?The competent authority?,?The mad Amos? and?The Cayman? "." More than thriller, that something has, indeed, seems to me, rather, a drama, a drama which is inserted into the chances of everyday life, with a touch of black comedy, but comedy. Really, all development, as life itself, is based on chance: things come them the characters because, precisely at that time, they passed through there. Why is justified, in my view, fully, the choice of director for tables that have just engarzando. I do not see as a puzzle, but as a difference of perspective of the various actors, and the result I liked. The characters that inhabit 'The night of the sunflowers' are very different among themselves. The film begins with something that, apparently, "do not block": a commercial, in role of rapist (Manuel Morón), just his slaughter. and continues its path. By pure chance, just in the town in which the facts are developed. The Mayor of the town has called a speleologist, Esteban (Carmelo Gómez), that rule if a cave found in the village can be a good factor of tourist attraction. By chance, the another Caver who is going with this cannot do this and, by chance, is another individual, Peter (Mariano Alameda), and the girlfriend of the first, Gabi (Judith Diakhate), those who come. By chance, the commercial role of rapist will find Gabi in quite acceptable to play its role. She manages to escape in a bad way and find it her boyfriend and passenger in his vehicle, injured and in apparent shock. This is the beginning of the drama. Cecilio (Cesareo Estebanez), Amos (Walter Vidarte), the civil guard (Vicente Romero) and the Cape of Benmérita (Celso Bugallo) will be added to it. Everyone entering the drama by pure chance. Carmelo Gomez is simply masterful. No less masterful of Celso Bugallo, whose character grows as the film unfolds. Walter Vidarte dutifully plays a character that seems to me difficult: it is not easy to give verisimilitude to a person whose mental faculties are not very beyond without falling into the ridiculous. Cesáreo Estébanez gives the precise tone of hard man and law that is facing a monstrous absurdity. Personally, the performance of Judith Diakhte is discreet, but it seems to me that his character nor gives more. Not liked at all Mariano Alameda. It is true that the character is a both cantamañanas, but the Alameda version lacks even the credibility of such. Yes I liked, on the other hand, Vicente Romero, the guard that is corrupted to avoid having to provide explanations and, while looking for an airy exit. It seems excessive to me (but, obviously, so it seems to me) dedicated to the commercial rapist footage. I do not think an essential character, although Yes it is the trigger for the history. His performance is nothing to be discrete and not just see him in that role. As regards the aspects "negative", apart from those already specified in the interpretation, photography not has seemed too good. Perhaps more party places and people could have gotten. There is also, perhaps, an error in continuity (the vehicle which had to present the notable front coup, appears in a scene without a scratch). Also, the post-traumatic stress of Gabi is reduced to the immediate aftermath of the attempted rape. There is perhaps a somewhat "miraculous" improvement of the same. I think that most of the fans will enjoy this film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2232

Pruden Rodríguez

Bajo las estrellas

muchocine

Sponsored by Fernando Trueba, the young director navarro has surprised everyone with a daring Ribbon. A notable film, pleasant, fresh, interesting.

Excellent debut of Félix Viscarret in feature film. Sponsored by Fernando Trueba, young director navarro has surprised everyone with a daring film, under the stars, based on the novel "The trumpeter of the Utopia" Fernando Aramburu. As said Trueba in the preview: best thing about Viscarret is that it has its own style, something that many fail to achieve never. I agree, and they must think alike in Malaga: best film, director, actor protagonist and novel writing.The story is relatively simple: Benito, a trumpeter second row, failed, borrachuzo and disoriented, returns to Estella, his hometown, to attend the funeral of his father. There to recover the time lost with his brother Lalo, good-natured and innocent, and decides that it is worthwhile to extend the visit to rid him of the woman that is going to marry: Nines (in another time binge and too early for everything). However, to know his daughter Ainara (rebellious and introverted) was born an unexpected friendship and open new paths.It is difficult to decide between drama with comedic overtones or comedy with dramatic overtones. In any case, laughter, even laughter, is guaranteed but it also has a very emotional point, a very human background, with characters lost, abused, unhappy, failed. Life no smiles them too and if ever they had dreams, they have forgotten. However, in others, you will find the sufficient motives to move forward. And one average film, can be concentrated, thinking in those things, cruel that life can sometimes be, injustices, etc. and to soon hear any bullshit at mouth of Benito (Alberto San Juan) and not be able to avoid doubled with laughter. No doubt the acidity of this character, calling her young friend puerca, and has no qualms about giving a little March to the burial of his father, is one of the strong points of the film. Are, in fact, all the characters, interpreted as well as excellently.Highlights also the photograph of Álvaro Gutiérrez and the music of Mikel rooms (both elements successful, care, always with the tone of the story but without taking the leading role). In short, a remarkable film, pleasant, fresh, interesting, to which, to put some sticks, perhaps left some footage.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/78

Iñigo

Flores rotas

muchocine

He relates the concerns of the contemporary man, with abundant metaphors and unforgettable moments

The life of Don, a Don Juan gone in years, has become a kind of stagnation, in a purely innocuous wait. A man who has been (and is being) how his life and opportunities escape, while he remains static and parsimonious in his sofa. His life is going. but he is simply able to see it pass without even analyzing situations, assess them or think a minimum of them.Don is alone. Don feels alone. He feels that his life is not anything that can be fact you. But do not feel (forgive the double meaning) to think about it, to find the reason for his condition.It is a totally empty and lost, man that can not get to see any notion of vitality or feeling. But he that seems to not care. Actually, at the moment not known the meaning of importance.It is part of your sofa. The closest thing to a static object simply was let go by weather, by chance or by the cobwebs that the wheel of your life can bring you.Bill Murray, our particular and bland Don Juan last thread, fashion and everything that happens to him the most avid Viewer is immersed in one of those roles that only he could make culminating with a convincing result. The character of Don him goes like ring finger, that I do not think that nobody dude. And after other similar jewelry jewels as "Lost in Translation" (especially the movie Sofia, with which "Broken flowers" saved certain parallels) or "Life Aquatic", has seen how the celluloid has managed to discover the perfect hollow of the actor between so many unexplored aspects.For many is now even dated, but it is absolutely true that there is no actor (at least in Active) able to do its job without doing absolutely nothing. Bill good is unique in making its inexpressiveness gala, but giving it at the same time of an impressive expressiveness, however much that contradict both cases. That is, our "Ghostbusters" in particular, a time to here (as many think), just to earn a salary is walking ahead of the camera wearing her deadpan facies and its position static (almost to the cadaverous stiffness) to any corner, situation or moment, requires it or not the sentiment reflected in the script. No heckling of any kind. And the funny thing is that he achieved much more than other "academic" actors who use such hackneyed technique books and/or workshops.And I think that there lies one of the weak points of his detractors. They see him, without doing anything remarkable, produces unexplained results. And that can certainly be frustrating.With a single face (which, I might add, nor is any expression standard bearer), a simple opening of the mouth beyond than usual in his person or a simple turn of the head, comes to communicate in a brutal way. Maybe a similar feeling always communicates (vacuum, vital distaste, irony, apathy or pasotismo), but is something really complex.Comes me to mind one of the eyes of Zissou in "Life Aquiatic", replete with an innocence and depth anthology, which I doubt that any actor (with all the gestures and words of the world) could match, much to do. Bill Murray comes without barely raise it. It is his way of acting.Maybe for some, that could undermine her merits. But his talent is there. To convert ordinary and banal into extraordinary and profound. And, although be aware of many things that I have argued, to me, personally, I love it. Yes. I love Bill Murray. I adore your inexpressiveness. It is so. expressive.Thus in "Broken flowers" see a Bill/Don has stopped being human ago time. Its vital carelessness has already reached a point of no return, a time in which, much to do, nothing can be achieved. And the problem is that he does not want to do anything that turbe his banal and boring life. Gives you fear the mere fact of thinking about it. What search sense things? It is better than the time pass, the present Act, the past is left behind and the future. simply come.Jarmusch, braid, a seemingly simple story, can watch with great ease, but that is fraught with great sense of many of those issues that occasionally we set, but sometimes not dare to analyze them. What will happen is fearsome.Among so much simplicity and apparent banality, Don can glimpse a small hole in which look and reconsider their own existence. And, although their desire to live and feel sometimes lead you to madness or absurd imaginations, you can rediscover himself. Maybe realizes that his life has been ridiculous, is an indomitable asshole or that it has been wasting time, but at least not fail that things come as is."Kafkaesque" search of his supposed son is just an excuse to look for himself, give meaning to a life that is lost and without direction. Imagination, the power of inventiveness, the desire to make sense of things and search are things that give strength to the spirit before such zafiedad and carelessness of a past. Therefore, no matter if the kid is really his son, what will matter is the journey made. Although end resembling an abnormal, an idiot who returns to observe (unperturbed) how his life is absurd. But, again, it will give you all the same. Or maybe not.Film director as "Coffee and Cigarettes", carried out in that way, which is his best work. Her it garnished with their logical touches of personality, with those elements that differentiate a director with talent and full of ideas. Therefore, we again see that mixture between surreal/absurd and ironic humor and sobriety of a calibre close to exhaustion. It is, in appearance, a very serious film, but at the same time full of situations which will result in the laugh, even though it it also from a point of view serene, parsimonious and acid.We can also see other classic elements of the film from the director of "Permanent Vacation". Their accurate drawings, their continuing breaks, its scarcity of dialogues (often unnecessary), the image apparently empty or banal, and that it is actually loaded with nostalgia. As an example, we have these repeated scenes of travel by car from Don, in which show us the elements that pass or the spots through mirrors, as throwing the look back, looking for a pleasure lost in nostalgia. That same, to cite something, gives us to understand the sad past of a man who was Don Juan par excellence and is today a Don Nadie. These elements her almost approaching a "road-movie", with gear that could articulate her as a work of cult and, no doubt, as the best film of Jim Jarmusch. His earlier works are discussed between the genius and the irregularity, but none reached the level of formal perfection of "Broken flowers". A luxury and an example of how to make a different and sincere film.All this sprinkled with a great touch on the picture, in charge of a David Lynch classic: Frederick Elmes. And not forgetting the excellent musical choice, worthy of a nearly masterful success.As regards interpretations, one could say that the rest of the cast is really good, but is completely overshadowed by the presence of Bill Murray.En final, we have a very relaxed pace work, with a serene, flow without potholes, which manages you goals fully in the history and see her as something natural, sincere and very credible. It's something real and close, despite the apparent extravagance of his characters.It is a very common theme in our time as the loss of vital sense of a man who thinks that it no longer has anything to offer, after being all in earlier times.Relates the concerns of the contemporary man, with abundant metaphors and unforgettable moments: the rediscovery of the new life (not very stable or happy, so to somehow) his past relationships, touching occasionally extravagance in his travels, or, for example, the terribly scathing wink with the appearance of the particular "lolita" of Jarmusch. For all types of palates.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1922

JLO

2001, Odisea del espacio

muchocine

The definition of the initial word of the title is a good synthesis of the film. A long trip in one consistent exercise for the mind of a philosopher, for a common Viewer.

"After having her seen repeatedly, I realized that this is the first time I feel that an artist is"very"above me." Woody AllenOdisea (title of a Homeric poem): long journey which abound in adverse and favourable to the traveller adventures (encyclopedic dictionary Salvat). The definition of the initial word of the title is a good synthesis of the film. A long trip said (and add also metaphysical, lyrical and megalomaniac in equal parts) in an exercise according to the mind of a philosopher, for a common Viewer. Loaded of symbolism and interpretations that escape and rediscovered in repeated visions of the film, it is unfathomable, ambiguous and fascinating. Is this film a director obsessed by this masterpiece? Is it worthy of a visionary or a film pretentious and boring like few others?Wanting to embrace and develop the primitive beginnings of man, the extraterrestrial life with future technology and development and evolution sounds, the less, excessive for any mortal. Trying to Stanley Kubrick, it sounds not so outlandish. Comment on 2001 is made with some trepidation: the power not cover it in its entirety. With so many edges and varied interpretations as each one to strive and create view. Without fear of mistakes, it is one of the best films of its genre and an essential reference in the creative universe of this talented director. It brings together each and every one of his obsessions and successes, as well as its own flaws.Also changed the path of science fiction forever, being a minor - almost B class and despised genus up to that point. Number placed in the survey is made among the best films in the history.Dawn of the hombreEste before and after we pointed out, is because both its form and its content. The prologue with the apes transvestite perfectly, like the primitive steps and changes of human evolution towards the man. For this reason, the positions and almost human movements are necessary. This achieved by actors - mimes - highlighting "Moonwatcher" (Daniel Richter) for being the leader, and who stars in the mythical scene of the bone released into the air, which in a terrible and beautiful ellipsis becomes the ship Discovery (discovery). The alignment of the stars always anticipating a major event; the spacecraft to the tune of the Blue Danube by Johann Strauss simulating a sexual dance for its forms (according to Kubrick "a mechanical ballet"); they may be crazy as a trait of genius.Scenes of beauty and emotional depth rarely seen in a film until today. The flat monolith of black granite - symbol of superior extraterrestrial intelligence? or God?-is the only link that allows Kubrick to us in the film. Otherwise, develops it our own imagination (who wants some clue or meanings, will need to read the book by Clarke that abounds in them).Thus spoke final KubrickEl containing a new be pure and original (called the child star) is hopeful and an unpublished positivism in his films. All point out at this point, to the similarities between the content of the film and the book of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche called thus spoke Zarathustra. Everything begins to relate the main leiv motiv musical of 2001, called precisely same, composed by Richard Strauss at the end of the 19th century based on reading the same book. Then everything drew Nietzschean theory of the "Superman" and the return of the new man, a being without the limitations of the race human (does the child star?).Ownership is divided into several characters, perhaps for gigantic figure of the director, the only real "Star" of the film. Recognizable side are already named Moonwatcher, Dr. Floyd (William Sylvester that converses in a scene with his supposed daughter (Vivian Kubrick); astronaut Poole (Gary Lockwood), and the character of greatest exposure on screen during the final part: astronaut Bowman (Keir Dullea).)The real star and protagonist of 2001 - and that more lives in our memory - we know is the cold, cynical and static super computer HAL 9000. A sweeping personality and who was born primarily on female version, changing to avoid the sexual connotations which distraerían by others according to the director. A cruel, intelligent and almost human machine with the neutral, serious and mechanical voice of Canadian Douglas Rain (voice of NASA projects). The only but may be too extensive and psychedelic "trip" final of Bowman by the black hole - 8 minutes!-, that leads it to its own evolution. As bright passage through his colorful as tiring as if Kubrick wanted to show us for the umpteenth time his master to achieve unprecedented special effects that Yes, so far.HistoriaConvengamos that being 2001 nine years younger than the first Star Wars (1977), and with its archaic procedure (frame-by-frame by moving the models 4 mm for the time) does not show too much lower in the field, and not to mention, the artistic distance (see quote from Lucas at the end). A vision that is confusing despite the enjoyment and the difficult access to the plot by the absence (said before deliberate) of a conventional and linear structure of script.Kubrick said in his few interviews that 2001 is a "non-verbal" experience and that everyone has to do their own interpretation of apparently; Judging to only loose signs, with a vague consistency as being the now famous black monolith. Dialogs occupy only 40 of the 141 minutes, almost with a purpose of dispersion. He became so famous that in 1972 the great Tarkovsky created Solaris, commissioned as a Soviet response to the success of 2001, roundly denied by the director himself. "Finally, the awaited masterpiece (which he any both according to his sayings during the filming of Barry Lyndon), think that it had already made it at the end of the 1960s a contramano of his time and is called: 2001 Space Odyssey."The film moves to the closest level with painting and music than with the written word. "Why films offer the possibility to explain concepts and abstractions without the traditional unit of words."Stanley Kubrick "I am quite happy that not have compared it both with 2001 (to Star Wars)." At the technical level they can be compared, but I think that 2001 is much higher. "They had ten times more money and time, and obviously came out better." George Lucas, Rolling Stone, August 25, 1977

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3723

JLO

Luca vive

muchocine

Music - and Sumo - had its own characteristics: strong, powerful, visceral neighborhood poetry, harshness. Unfortunately, all things this film suffers.

Always say that when a fact deeply affect one remember exactly where, with whom and what was done. The death of Luca Prodan produced this effect in me and of course I remember where and I was doing. As I did with the deaths of other artists such as Alberto Olmedo, Freddy Mercury and other great rock rebel as it was don Kurt Cobain.Luca and his band (the legendary Sumo, germ of much of what you hear today on Argentina) were pillars with the Redonditos of ricotta, an underground movement of early eighties that changed all the previously established national music. Music - and Sumo - had its own characteristics: strong, powerful, visceral neighborhood poetry, harshness. Unfortunately, all things this film suffers. It is true that it did not want to review life linearly or is intended to be an accurate bio, but sins remain only in anecdotes, in fragments interlaced by their relationships of dubious likelihood and does not help a montage furious, with an animation trying to show the travel and poetry of Luca with excessive slowness of the musical films of the 70's to The Wall or Tommy. decision equally riskyalways will be enough for the fan and too chaotic for the unsuspecting Viewer. The most interesting aspects of his personality are just outlined: rebelliousness, animal force on stage, his depressive melancholy, its mix of genius and insanity. Yes they are Tom Lupo, the infamous today Omar Chabán and local cement. Its Geneva, bulín Alsina Street, their ira attacks. Not so a key detail of this story: his music. For only rights problems appear covers permitted and sung by the actor know little, despite the good achieved sound (years, night of peace, Fever). Daniel Ritto already accustomed to the character to represent for more than five years in theatre (and also responsible for the screenplay) strives to both phonetically in the interpretation, doing a credible Luca and without unrest. Jorge Coscia (jets, Sepoys, Comix) stands far away give us a pasteurized or cartoon, image without solemnity and showing their love and admiration for Luca, escapes his essence and we agree that it is quite difficult to achieve talking about this character. Too much lyricism by times, chaotic, film ambiguous to one of our greatest myths of rock. A be unique, ahead in life saying: "I am in the right, turned are you."

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1740

Francisco Bellón

Diario de un escándalo

muchocine

Diary of a scandal dares to explore very difficult and controversial issues, but does so with great care, subtlety and sensitivity, without judging their characters.

More than one month has passed since presenting the Oscar, and when it seemed that he had completed the hangover of the winners (and losers), suddenly again come to the fore. And arriving at the Spanish charts one of the films that chose several small statues of the important (adapted screenplay, actress, supporting actress and music), British Journal of a scandal. nobody can doubt the good shape affecting British cinema today, both in quality and international repercussion.Richard Eyre offers us adaptation of the controversial novel by Zoe Heller, which chronicles the relationship that arises between two professors, Barbara (Judi Dench) and Sheba (Cate Blanchett). Sheba is married to one man older than her, Richard (Bill Nighy), while Barbara remains unmarried. Their relationship will be a turning point when Barbara discovers the adventure keeps Sheba with one of his students, Steven (Andrew Simpson). One of the virtues of diary of a scandal is that it dares to explore very difficult and controversial, issues almost taboo. But unlike what you sell trailers, Richard Eyre does so with great care, subtlety and sensitivity, without judging their characters. In no time the tape falls into sensationalism or in easy ways. The solid screenplay by Patrick Marber contains a few characters very well built, showing them in all their humanity, full of feelings, joys and miseries. The pace that prints Eyre film is excellent, and the duration is fair and necessary, one minute. Despite the virtues of history, above all include Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett, which performed a few simply colossal interpretations. Both embark on a real tour de force (the best in many years) interpretive, embroidering intricate characters, making them credible and close to the Viewer.Diary of a scandal is an essential film, a modern classic, that invites a viewer worried to reflect on the great variety of issues and questions posed by the history. And it is an opportunity like no other to see two of the best actresses in the current film scene in an interpretative duel that make time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/353

Rafa Ferrer

Super Nacho

muchocine

The film continues to be a sum of gags, some with much grace, others with none...

Vehicle for total and absolute showcasing of Jack Black as Nacho, the wrestler, while the movie continues to be a sum of gags (some with much grace, others with none), the film ends so spontaneous and you walk towards the exit of the room with another question in the head that the tape does not resolve, which is not that he intends.Jack Black incredible, squeezing out absolutely his humorous vein, his gestures, and especially his sense of humor, as is the first who laughs at himself, so fat he incorporated in these Mayan and wearing "triporra", with regard to their co-stars, perhaps makes it a tad of shadow (or him eclipse with its singular beauty), the Mexican actress Ana de la Reguera, well worth the price of admission see those eyes Jet color that appears on screen (and is, I admit it, I can eels).He did not want to finish without talking about Hector Jimenez, who plays the role of skeleton, and that with only 2 gestures and many (too many) screams, gets in the Pocket to the audience, this type ahead muuucha comedy show us.Indeed, the soundtrack runs on behalf of Danny Elfman, so we must walk "watchful ear". In short, funny, full of gags, those of scraping 5 tape.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1758

Matías Cobo

El último rey de Escocia

muchocine

Whitaker gets to join in interpretation varied traits of the personality of the former Ugandan President: at times, naive and childish, though, in the background, a terrifying sadistic.

What are the ingredients of this alluring potion with which some leaders sprayed its population by immersing it in a sense of blind ISM? Do perhaps a mixture of charisma, false empathy conciudadana and dose of populism in bulk? I do not know but all the leaders autoerigidos in salvapatrias have been able to play perfectly with all of them.Idi Amin, President of Uganda from 1971 to 1979, is portrayed with these traits in the last King of Scotland, tape directed by Kevin Macdonald in which overhangs, others of his virtues, the excellent interpretation of the always splendid Forest Whitaker. As in other African regimes, are witnessing the Ascension of the President between an overwhelming popular acclaim. There no matter that the leader becomes charged with using weapons; in fact, it is common currency in these countries where the word democracy only serves as slogan. Once settled in power, these characters of zero qualifications (supposedly, Amin was illiterate) are seen as the magic solution to all the ills of the country. But as the illusion of his short-lived, soon will begin to emerge the darker back of any dictatorship.In addition to the face of the Amin coleguilla and Nice, the last King of Scotland shows quite another through the eyes of a young Scottish doctor chosen by one for personal care and his vast offspring. And Whitaker, with the characteristic perfection in it, get together in its interpretation varied traits of the personality of the former Ugandan President: at times, naive and childish, but, ultimately, a sadistic frightening that, under its mandate became more autoritorio and less productive, was empowered by a paranoid fear to an attempt on his life. And we know that, in brains of limited neuronal capacity, violence tends to be the common response to any threat. So, at the end of their bloody term, historians put the number of Ugandans passed to knife by the regime of the former boxing champion at 300,000.Although some of the elements of its plot sound topics and not finish function (the possible incestuous relationship between Dr. Nicholas - James McAvoy - and Sarah Merrit - Gillian Anderson - seems closed false), the tape offers a remarkable portrait on the strange power of seduction that these leaders advenidos as a universal antidote exerted on people, whether more or less legal. And step, with the last King of Scotland, the film returns to help expose another of so many acts of genocide committed in Africa while we looked for another side in the West with his testimony.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1377

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El ángel exterminador

muchocine

Infinitely rich, distinct, surreal film risky until exhaustion. The film is essential to healthy dialogue mesa-camilla then.

Random not presented Buñuel with faith: nor agreed. That sort of intolerance in the theological field formed a single work that came to represent, in part, the convulsive panorama political and ideological of the Spain that Don Luis was forced to flee. All this hectic ideology of militant apostasy and aesthetic anarchy have are added formidably written in the exterminating Angel, which is worth as much as a vehicle strictly film which as a personality profile complex carved in adversity and in certain school of free thought and almost unique talent (Lorca, Dalí, Alberti).The enormous ability of Buñuel (and infinite risk that contracts) is to make plausible entirely absurd, rayana situation in the injustice: a large group of guests invited by the burghers Nóbile can not (in literal form) leave a room even though no physical evidence prevented an act so basic and simple. "The natural course of those days of confinement them is a wild instinct for survival that collides head-on with the Protocol and the educated and civilized ways exhibited before the desastramiento of the situation."During the filming of "Viridiana" I met the writer José Bergamín, who told me that he intended to write a play with the title of "The exterminating Angel". I told him that it was a magnificent title and that if he was going down the street and saw announced, would come to see the show. As Bergamín never wrote the work, I wrote asking for the rights of the title. "Replied me that I didn't need to ask them, given that those words appeared in the book of revelation." The origin of the title thus explained Buñuel. The exterminating Angel is the Chronicle of a shipwreck. Indeed the work which is freely based called "The castaways of Providence Street", never written, but prefigured in the mind of Buñuel, Luis Alcoriza, his right hand in all the Mexican experience. And we must understand the film as a shipwreck and how survivors must learn to communicate to achieve out of the confinement and leave the island / room. It would have been better make history in England (had Buñuel) because the society there is extremely educated and all that education and refinement much suited the plot of the film, which came to be the simple idea that, under appropriate conditions, the human being is capable of more perverse, but she is attributed (by nature, by culture) the most sublime things. In very summary words, the exterminating Angel is a portrait of the human, but screened by surrealist evidence decadence. Panic, fear of death or loneliness may be waste of a surreal way of understanding reality. There are philosophers whose absolute writing revolves around the idea of absurdity that is death: life is an inertia, life is a continuum, and not a continuum which can be (unrealistically) fragmented, mutilated.The guests are deplorable, superior in an almost nazi sense of the term: the effort of Buñuel gazes up the impossible the aborregamiento of an embebecida and haughty, cultured aristocracy who despises all forms alien to their benefit, its strict protocol. It may seem a joke who attend the film with an excess of critical (or movie buff) spirit. You have to want to go beyond and understand that Buñuel made an activities, a slapstick, a descent to the embarrassment that the world has encopetada rabble that looks of glancing to others by the mere fact of is different. This 21st century newly lighting already has been filling the term "otherness", which is a Word, a semantic resource horrifying to designate the evidence of the other, their interference in our world, that can (all) also be yours.Film indispensable to then make healthy dialogue mesa-camilla: gives equal that we liked much, little or that we consider that it is a real pain unbearable. Everything is accepted. It just has a little of everything and brings together film in height and immeasurable boredom. To me the review filled me with joy (many before then) of a film I saw in times of University with the food by gongorinas fever head and an exalted sense of injustice in the world. Other times they are now or are always the same and travisten to confuse our generational daze.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3524

Plissken

Rec

muchocine

Balagueró and Plaza point somewhat large base to the public what it wants (video games, realities, morbid...) and add one accurate bad baba and a terrifying final stretch.

21St century: leisure, as we knew it, has changed. People no longer confined to watch shows, being the passive subject of the already outdated audiovisual media. Instead, he has discovered the interactivity of the game, and more and more and more consumers opt for this fun way to pass the hours. Aware of this, Paco Plaza and Jaume Balagueró, Luis Berdejo have created 'REC', a cinematic experience closer to the reality we perceive today that the vast majority of films released this year. And this has double merit when 'REC' is a tape of terror, zombie subgenre. Almost nothing.The initial overview, no credits, no music, no nothing, you immersed in the experience to the first round: Ángela and Pablo, two reporters from the local TV program ' while you can sleeps ', cover a night's work at a barracks of firefighters from Barcelona. The first call of the night leads them to an old building where an elderly woman is scaring, with her screams throughout the neighborhood. And in barely a few seconds Ángela and Pablo spend the routine work to witness an Apocalypse of neighborhood courtyard and fight for their lives (and their exclusive).The big bet of Balagueró and Plaza in this "survival horror" film is not constant terror or the oppressive atmosphere, but a tremendous amount of bad milk bathed in reality, and seasoned large-caliber scares and homages to the genre. While the proposal recalls 'The project of the Blair Witch', the big difference is their kid sense of humor and review intendionado to all the common places of the subgenus: Group of diverse, dead characters that revive, blackouts, shoddy survival plans, shortage of weapons, isolation. There is time for everything in the most entertaining of recent Spanish film eighty minutes, even, how not, for terror, which ceases to make intermittent appearances to settle permanently in the stunning (and full of clichés, also) the last twenty minutes of history.The absolute protagonists are a splendid Manuela Velasco, giving life to an Angela in the other hands could have done 'Rec' a disaster, and Paul, of which I speak later. The rest of the side, with the exception of some less realistic time, get you enter perfectly in the joke that we see every day in the 'happening', for example.In the technical section, Pablo Rosso, director of photography and camera real and "Pablo the camera" in fiction deserves special mention. Its excellent double work, technical and interpretative, is something that is overlooked when analyzing the film, and a key element of 'REC' seems to me: never go to the character, so you now to the character. You, the Viewer, you're Paul, the camera, and are always in the first line of fire. Any amateur video games will know what I mean. Among the other sections include the shocking FX and makeup of Inside FX, which have the added difficulty of look magnificent in the midst of a plane sequence, camera on his shoulder and an anticinematográfica light. Chapeau for them.And in the negative section, apart from the less spontaneous interpretative moments, could just cite the drawbacks of the aesthetics of home video: lacklustre flat, dizzying movements or chaotic sound. But it would be an exercise in cheap hypocrisy to criticize these aspects, because they are elements that give the necessary credibility to the whole.In summary: Balagueró and Plaza point somewhat large base to the public what it wants (video games, realities, morbid.) and add one accurate bad baba and a terrifying final stretch. Objective fulfilled, gentlemen. 9.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1532

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Inland empire

muchocine

A history of Soviet rabbits in a world without ratings. Someone understand me? Here is the deep substrate of this problem.

Inland empire is a bluff, a sidereal fly in an ashtray of foam, a beautiful psychedelic fish drowned in a juice of amphetamines, a superlative adjective in a text without possible outcome, a song by Philip Glass (of the most thick and unaffordable) in a reventona Tavern of retirees. Inland empire is David Lynch in its purest form. Recently I wrote here a little text on the things of the Lynch friend when it is proud of its creativity and dares to go, naked, hair, the secrets of the art. At this point, I do not know if the journey has been satisfactory. In my case, thinking only in my rejoicing as a spectator, has not been any recommended trip. And that this good man has made me spend pleasant moments, júbilos much height with some of his films. Here too there are a (necessarily brief) comment to his Blue velvet, but this Inland empire is something else: something of a slower chewing and a confusion of more systematic because when Lynch decided to confuse us there is no doubt that is going to get it. Off, we fail to elucidate reasons which includes only his reason.I have no desire to disrupt alien curiosity as well that I am not going to gutting the argument. Nor do I have the certainty that could. I don't know in what state of trance narrative to be to matching the appropriate verbs, with fair adjectives that life a synthesis, a synopsis or as you want to say.His generous footage gives for wanting to leave or want to last one hour, according to the spirit. We were then in that this film is a challenge to our patience or a gift for our Kinky masochism. I have read comments on the net that give complete information (place, designed, exquisitely notarized) on the film and others that, fortunately, allied with my disappointment or my perplexity.Inland empire (will and finalized) deserves equal revisionado. As some Dreyer's or the more robust and staff Cronenberg films. Scarcely matter to leave Laura Dern (that are thirty women in one or not is no woman and everything is a poetic twisting of our mind-blowing mind) or my very dear (except in Eragon and some another trip to the watered-down film of primary school pupils) Jeremy Irons.Lo I have very clear is the tremendous game facing the boring blogger Lynch (today with rings by the time sensationalism of the Oscars) or responsible for movie buff who wants toto despite the inconveniences, give always and everywhere a message clear, sharp, decodeable.I I am abstaining: I arrobo the legitimacy of not to speak. That you think others. Or this is an opinion: the unique, perhaps. Everything else is an exercise tightrope of sins not cleaned, women on the verge of an attack of Lynch, rather.I promise that I will see it shortly with a less contaminated mentality. If it is possible. And write (as God or Billy Wilder mandan) another entry in my page, another review on this every day more complete page of cinema in the network. For the benefit of inventory movie buff. The world is strange.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/519

Beatriz Perez

Shinobi

muchocine

A very bad pelîcula that ademâs has a whiff to second categorîa pelîcula in all aspects.

'Tiger and Dragôn' became fashionable the pelîculas asiâticas of jumping wrestlers that jumping jumping, are hitting right and left everyone who will put ahead. And although they were previously was after the Ang Lee film when came us a true explosiôn of similar caracterîsticas tîtulos, some who managed to cross the borders of its paîs, and many others who have stayed inside but then they have reached us in dvd format. 'Shinobi' is estrenô last week in our paîs and not in all cities of the country. Seeing it one understands why. Y es que hay pelîculas merecerîan sleep the sleep of the righteous forever and not be released or edited on dvd. Clear that if that does not happen cômo can find out that they are bad? Always us quedarîa the doubt in case of not seeing them. I have seen 'Shinobi', and I can say that it is a complete waste of time. Did expect me? Not me I have caught on? Tampoco.en a was in which the ninjas walked by the Earth to suit, two clans were enfrentarân to death because sî, which is the best razôn to face death with someone. To this end both sides elegirân two small groups of experts warriors so they face and are they to decide the outcome of the fight. The problem of the matter is that the lîderes of both groups are a kind of Romeo and Juliet, both very lunatics on the other one. That obviously repercutirâ of form drâstica in the evolution of events, and that both lovers do not see lôgica the fight and however has faced. God, how nice.The pelîcula is appalling, but not technical cutrez, but mâs well temâtica. The plot premise is mâs well mînima and never develops enough cômo to make an interesting story. On the other hand treatment is totally errôneo, because they want to make us believe that the pelîcula does not give importance to trying to spectacular scenes that prime the intimate. The trouble with the theme is that the spectacular scenes are the best of the pelîcula, and for that not all, and întimo resolved estâ very chabacanamente not proving creîble at any time, as the love story deflated by all sides to be stuck to shoehorn and poorly explained. Then try during the proyecciôn be natural and make us see that these two love estân each other. For this they use long sequences that seems pure postcards that influence negatively the pace of the pelîcula making it aburridîsima.The best scenes of acciôn is to discover the skills of each Warrior, that I might add me recordô to the X-Men, but ahî just everything. In fact some of the sequences are confusing and one does not know much. Ademâs does not give time to learn a little characters that will removing us them in the Middle at the speed of lightning. The Visual effects are mâs or less acceptable, but fail to engage and fascinate as do the films of Zhang Yimou, for example. Apart from the happy plot inconsistencies, because if many of these tîos can almost fly and move forward should, do to what the hell they pick up a horse that van slow oft? And on top mounted us an escenita of equine persecuciôn. What are giving supersaltos, man!The actors walk across the film with hermetic faces without excepciôn. Jô Odagiri is fairly deadpan and his interpretaciôn has no force required. Yukie Nakama is very pretty but as an actress aquî leaves much to be desired. The case is that the actors seem to all as desganados, as if not trust in what estân doing, and no wonder, because getting into such producciôn debiô be desperate.A very bad pelîcula that ademâs has a whiff to second categorîa pelîcula in all aspects. I'm not saying B series to not insult a kind of cinema that has left me very good flavors of mouth in fantâsticas productions. Ten Shimoyama has worn by creating a film for the râpido forgotten. Habrâ to wait for other options in this type of cinema and desire to not take to arrive.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2937

Oscar Cantero

Os declaro marido y marido

muchocine

A crude imitation of comedy characterized by uncouth humor, bad taste and lack of class which often distill the pseudocómicos roles of Adam Sandler.

As the world had little punishment with Jim Carrey and his zafias grimaces, Hollywood was considering sending a second Angel Avenger, even more repellent and anchored at the time as the first. This specimen is named after Adam Sandler, and can be seen by the charts each certain periods of time, which comes out of his burrow to remind us all that always there can be something worse than the last thing that we have seen.On this occasion, appears on the screen together with Kevin James, that helps to the nonsense is still greater than already in itself represents a film that uses homosexuals to laugh and not with them. I say this because I declare unto you husband and husband is nothing more than a series of collected topics (and not of Geyper), which is not repaired in offending the dignity of whoever necessary in order to try to boot a smile to the Viewer, although the result causes displeasure more nose than anything else.Grosso modo, the story tells the adventures of two gulfs foolish (and heterosexual) who after coincidentally decide to marry to get a grant that is awarded to the couples gais. To impersonate this, they resort to all the stereotypes of bad taste, surrounding himself with reinonas and histriónicos characters that riánse you Paco Martínez Soria dressed in coat of fur and estropajosa wig in the aunt of Carlos.Para more inri, your advertising campaign in United States includes allusions to the defence of the normalization of homosexuality claiming to represent the film. Come on, claiming over make believe everything do to combat homophobia. At least not have the impertinence to use this argument in Europe; Maybe it's because the people here still think. But after two or three years of education for citizenship and other educational reforms of the various Governments (of all colors) perhaps shit like this end up being considered masterpieces in the old continent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/941

Jeremy Fox

Casino Royale

muchocine

If the next Bond is led by a director of the good, of those who have personality, I am sure that will be the best Bond of history.

From the beginning I defended the election of Daniel Craig as the new James Bond, provided that that implied a change of course in the series. "Well, once seen"Casino Royale", the sensations are good, and despite the shortcomings, one clear conclusion: habemus Bond.""Casino Royale" is, first and foremost, a new beginning of the character and very well could have been titled "Bond Begins". As Nolan's "Batman Begins" here also shows the desire to do something different and original character. There is a special care to give a sense of narrative to several of the typical elements of the series: the initial adventure before the credits or the use of the harmony Bond at the right time.The big difference with the tape of Nolan is just that: the director. Martin Campbell is very very far of Christopher Nolan and that the film so note. Isn't Campbell do so bad, in fact it is possibly his best work, but with another director we could be talking about something big.The film is divided into three major events clearly differentiated. In the first of them almost all the action of the film is concentrated, and although entertaining, does not break the spectator, proving almost too long. That Yes, we must recognize that it is very spectacular (and why not use the typical gadgets).The second act is more leisurely and develops the characters. Do not think that it is more boring because it is not. It is a pleasure for a follower of the Bond series, attend their birth, feel more real, more credible, without losing the aura of legendary invincible get smart.The third act is the conclusion of the story and what I least like the film because the final climax is not as successful as it should be, there is some confusion in the action and any decision defícil to understand. That Yes, the last minute is priceless and leaves one eager to see a new movie with Craig as "Bond, James Bond".In short, with this film something happens that should not surprise us. There is a good writer giving the final touches to the screenplay (Paul Haggis, signatory of the scripts of "Million Dollar Baby" and "Crash") and a few good actors (among those who would deploy Judy Dench, Eva Green and an inspired Daniel Craig).In the equation of the great film only need a good director and that is where they have to throw the other producers. If the next Bond is led by a director of the good, of those who have personality, I am sure that will be the best Bond of history. "Casino Royale", if it is not, stays very close.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/371

Jesus Lens

La noche de los girasoles

muchocine

I have been fascinated, causing me the mixture of repulsion and attraction that carries the look, face to face, the more murky, complex and contradictory status (in) human.

If this film, instead of passing in a village of Castile-León, aconteciese in places of Iowa or Wisconsin and instead of by civil guards, the criminal investigation was carried out by a sheriff tripudo and his young Assistant, we would be hearing and reading thousand and one magnificent film of black gender absolutely model and book critics.If, rather than come signed by an unknown Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo, carry the signature of the Coen brothers, we would be talking about a new enduring classic of the noir genre. Because "The night of the sunflowers" is an excellent black and crime genre film, based on a prodigious script that signs the same Jorge Sánchez. where has gone this type? What round in his head? Now, just a few hours after suffering and enjoy with his film, I don't know anything of him. But I think hear and, from now on, make a close monitoring. Because "The night of the sunflowers" has fascinated me, causing me the mixture of repulsion and attraction that carries the look, face to face, the more murky, complex and contradictory status (in) human.Let us in history: some young cavers reach a village, to investigate whether newly discovered caves may have some appeal from the turístico-arqueológico point of view - scientific. At the same time, a traveling salesman is teaching its showcase of industrial vacuum cleaners in the area. The only two survivors of a deserted village are still fighting and after the civil guard and one of his subordinates, which at the same time is his son-in-law, dine in House how to get, with these twigs, an excellent film of black gender? Such is the greatness of the indent of Sánchez-Cabezudo. Using resources tarantinianos, playing with time and space, by concatenating the cross stories of characters so private as simple and ordinary, having swallowed dry and brutal violence of Sam Peckimpah "straw dogs"; We have a film without concessions, exciting, hard, devastating.During the two hours of footage, there is little time to take a deep breath. -What is this?, you ask yourself continually. And this is. What Jorge pleases. And what want you is to change registration, surprise and enchant the Viewer every quarter of an hour. And you get it. "Because, as in the exquisite corpses that both liked our surrealists, each segment of the film is linked to the previous one, but only to give a brutal twist to a story which, however, ends up having a total and absolute, without leaving not an only coherence loose.""The night of the sunflowers" is a film of multiple viewings, calling voices a Deluxe Edition DVD that allows us to recreate in a puzzle so ingenious as well shot. If had to put a but. the music. Sometimes it becomes too obvious and charisma. But hey, you already see the but that we put to an extraordinary and colossal film that I'm already looking forward to see again.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4338

Cp

Monstruoso

muchocine

There is no denying that you as Monster film, style kaiju eiga manages to innovate the way of telling us it. It is a fantasy film with a filter of reality.

When sales of the film, and not stop to talk about the film with friends with whom you've gone to see it, it is usually that you liked. This is more about what you have just innovate J.J.Abrams. Now you can talk for hours about a movie, but in fact you do not speak of what you've seen on the tape, but all the information that surround. Like in lost, this shot well, is agile, interesting and really you it is counting a culebron ... Sorry!, a human history of relations between the characters, I wanted to say. There is no denying that you as Monster film, style kaiju eiga manages to innovate the way of telling us it. It is a fantasy film with a filter of reality. Everything seems credible, as it would really be the reaction to the attack of an unknown, including the go listening theories of all kinds of mouths of the characters to be. As with the Bourne saga, or the Ultimates comics, verisimilitude and realism is the master rule of director, screenwriter and productor.¿Pero that we have left if we remove all of that, and above all, not we have been following advertising campaign on the Internet that gives us a lot of information, which then does not appear in the film? Since fleeing a movie Monster and colleagues, shot camera in hand, where that is carrying the camera is actually somewhat useless, and sometimes teaches us cleavage, or has the monster to one side, from the 59 floor of a building and not think filming it. In that sense I like me, it's not like other movie camera in hand, where the camera does not lose or a detail, here is an amateur who does not know to use it. For the rest, I liked also that the first twenty minutes are to present the characters, giving us a sense of tranquility, until it reaches the time of action. A from there, scares, races, quite spectacular images, especially for this very measure the appearance of any horrible thing, and the feeling that you are not anyone. The military ignored you, you're one more in the mass of refugees, do not know that it happens, and every decision leads you to a new danger.The theory that we had yesterday, is that it may be a good trick to make a low budget movie, get a million dollar box office, and then make a second part, with a huge budget. So, Cloverfield would be the vista version from victims, and Cloverfield 2, a more classic film, with its scientists, military and political. Although Abrams that this involved, namely that history can get us. A crossover between Lost and Cloverfield? Rarest theory could be true, because the end is open and they you never really get anything.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1307

Jose Contreras

Dreamgirls

muchocine

It is not that the writer is bad, it is what happened as well. God does not know to write scripts.

Hate the biopics. I've said it many times, but I have the feeling that no one listens to me. For a lover of stories, there is no worst story than the biography of a person. The history of the "Dreams" is told to end up discovering that one of the characters was the bad. Even the worst screenwriter huviera warned the public that this type was bad in the first scene. "Dreamgirls" introduced him as a wonderful kind that helps them to climb. It is not that the writer is bad, it is what happened as well. God does not know to write scripts. I don't know why the film insists on fusilár them. If it charged copyright would leave him in peace, but as it does not charge, will have to continue holding biopics. And I do not know if I have said it, but I hate the biopics.The villain is so bad that his fault the singer Jimmy Early could not leave drug. It censured him a song and Early was released by his team of syringes and other tools of some that, Gee what a coincidence, had prepared in a pocket of the jacket. But if it is not for this reason, Early saves. In this movie there are many people doing harm to other people, people who saves other people, people that destroys the lives of other people. It is a film in which no one is to blame what happens, there is always a black hand. All blame the bad. The truth, I can't imagine anyone ruining my life. These tireless characters causing many casualties seem escapees of a nightmare, but I've never met the original of the portrait.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2653

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Turistas

muchocine

The worst film of the 21st century, or perhaps this digital chronicler had a bad day and need a second pass...

There is no subliminal discourse. There are not even speech. Tourists engolfa his vocation blockbuster with a colorful string of clichés that prevent the free movement of blood in the brain of the spectator, which is at all times regarded as stupid. This chronicler was an unfortunate hour in which I basculé between the uncertainty about my true movie buff stamina and the certainty that the exposure would cause me irreparable harm. What do I know: perhaps onwards not can enjoy Fritz Lang or the good Swedish movies arthouse (God save the master Bergman). Maybe, not just to be sure, my sensitivity is has bitten at all and already can not, Oh, engolosinar me with my usual rations of good cinema. What is good cinema for this digital scribe do because anyone that excited me: anyone that seeks me AWE.?? To me this carioca outburst of mindless tourists (da like that are not excessively hormonados teenagers) found me one of the films more hollow of the history of the Cine.Esta night look go to Vincent Minnelli: captives of evil, 1952. Kirk Douglas and a ravishing femme fatale called Lana Turner. The I've seen enough times, but I know you still have the ability to make me happy. That film. Of tourists is not film: is visual masturbation. The curious reader warned is. I do not know the end, but I had no commitment to climax that maybe necessary to warn the moral force of the plot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1242

Yojimbo

Matador

muchocine

In short, a pretty fun movie. Do not expect a very elaborate script, but it is written in a very original way and cause a few laughs with basis and without many of the clichés of common use.

Remove the stigma of one of the most popular secret agents in the history of the cinema is difficult, but as other professionals who don't want to stagnate, Pierce Brosnan has been able to choose a less commercial than the custom project.Matador (dispensable copy of the Almodovar film) is like A dangerous therapy but something more "indie". (Sounds like something superficial, but it was the reference that I constantly came to the head while he was in good company (including an unusual cinemas);) However, the Richard Shepard film mixes elements "deeper" and something more interesting that of the Ramis.Julian film is a Hitman who is a little tired of his nomadic life. His boredom solves with drink and women. However, some day someone remembers something he had been overlooked: his own birthday. That makes you think. And chance makes it meet Danny, a seller with very bad luck and a recent tragedy. This meeting in a bar in Mexico will change your life.The best of the film is undoubtedly the actors. And the exotic of the script that moves by many countries representing the uprooting of a nomadic lifestyle and, worst of all, isolation against which must be fought when it absorbs us work. On that basis "serious" us is an original sometimes wrong and sometimes divertimento.I am very surprised "rude" Brosnan character in one role more than interesting. And Greg Kinnear, giving the pego as the typical pardillo currant with bad luck. Hope Davis, although it comes out shortly, is always welcome, and other side giving you certain entity to the film.In short, a pretty fun movie. Do not expect a very elaborate script, but it is written in a very original way and cause a few laughs with basis and without many of the clichés of common use.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/393

Alvaro Oliva

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

It does not differ much from the curse of the Black Pearl, so we find ourselves with the same mechanisms by which he enjoyed with his adventures will again do so on this occasion.

Jack Sparrow is back at it again and this time presents a new adventure in which again put his life in danger. Next to it, we find ourselves with Will Turner and Elizabeth (Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley) who already made us enjoy the first delivery, and who inevitably return to cross on the path of the fearless pirate, to the delight of the spectators.Dead man's chest does not differ much from the curse of the Black Pearl, so we find ourselves with the same mechanisms by which he enjoyed with his adventures will again do so on this occasion. It should be noted the figure of the evil Davy Jones, who has a large presence on the screen and helps to believe us everything that we're seeing. There is no objection in the technical sections, moreover, this new installment in the Visual is spectacular. Its purpose has been achieved and note. So we have no more to immerse ourselves in the depths of the ocean and wait to the Black Pearl we collect in this anticipated third part, which incidentally will conclude us this second, that very wisely (money is the money) has left us wanting to know what happens with Davy Jones and company.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1612

Rafa Ferrer

Guia del autoestopista galáctico

muchocine

Adaptation of the work of Douglas Adams. A tape that have to do with some degree of complicity, but leave much to be desired.

The Galactic Hitchhiker guide is a series of books created by Douglas Adams, who have been waiting centuries its adaptation to the big screen, finally and after hundreds of negotiations finally is has brought to fruition the film, after a TV series which only saw in GB.To say that the film is a masterpiece would be lying, it would also say that it is bad, because we are not before anything like "Star Wars" and "Star Trek" or anything else like, a tape of absurd humor that from the very beginning must continue the game and immerse in the story to tell without more pretensions than the spend a fun time, the type of humor perhaps remember somewhere that another occasion to the monty python with the crazy humor and those designs that although great can fall from time to time in the most absolute of the mediocrity.Several moments to make this something special tape, the principle that explains as we humans (and the song of the dolphins), the image of the whale, and the "translator element", all based on a comedy series "jam" that, or is this in total harmony with the film or seem a supine bullshit.Interpretive plot, highlight to Sam Rockwell, in a role originally intended for Jim Carrey, who manages with his character be afraid to have someday head elsewhere, Martin Freeman, that brings that image does not know very well where walks needs the main character, and Marvin, the trapped robot in the depression, which provides voice Alan Rickman.Resumiendoa tape that have to do with some degree of complicity, but leave much to be desired.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/126

Jango Fett

Salvaje (The Wild)

muchocine

Savage reveals the big problem there is today in day in the animation industry

Savage is a hybrid film between two already known, I am referring to Madagascar, Finding Nemo, and is that the influence of Madagascar well clear, a few animals that escape from the zoo in New York. And as for why Finding Nemo, this also very clear, is the story of a father looking for his son, and although this time non-fish and are lions, it is clear that we are telling the same story. And the truth is very pathetic that Disney go copying PDI and even something more surprising, copied if same, given that even "Buscando a Nemo" Pixar these act under the Disney label. Jobs to copy also decide to copy the great failure of Madagascar is to not develop the story in New York, but in the jungle and therefore repeated the same mistake that the part in the big city is much more interesting and brief than the rest of the movie. But hey, forget about that wild is a copy and look at the rest, do we find? Therefore very little truth, the characters are quite dull and hard to believe that Kiefer Sutherland put voice to the lion character animation characters usually have a personality and appearance similar to that of the person that doubles, in the wild not this happens far. The events that are happening in the story are also very repetitive of other movies, I think that since that C-3PO to the Ewoks confused it with a God has repeated itself this hundreds of times, is in fact curious to see just two days ago I saw something similar in Ice Age 2 and today again I see it in the wild. Wild highlights the great problem that there are today in day in the animation industry and is only Pixar and PDI can do good movies and the rest of animation studios are trying to just follow these leaders making similar movies but they are bland, boring and jerks sometimes as it has already happened with ValiantIce Age 2, Chicken Little and now this. And the reality is that each has found the originality and their own path, not limited to copy the big. The movie isn't bad, but isn't good, is just an hour and average of situations where nothing but nothing and only made so that children buy plush toys of the characters in the movie. And even the movie just a little unfinished form and with a not very closed end, I hope that they do not plan to make sequel. And not be fooled, if they take a child to see this movie is divertira probably, but this generation will not enjoy a great movie of animation as so many other generations have done. And it is that child not cried with Bambi, nor even with beauty and the beast, or even it will be big with Toy Story, simply see a movie the next day there will be forgotten and that when I grow up will be unable to remember if he really saw her. The only positive and remarkable detail of the movie is the choice of some very good songs (although few) for the soundtrack of the movie include issues of Coldplay or Lifehouse.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3564

Ana Belén Pacheco

Dead silence

muchocine

The same film in itself is a tremendous boring and predictable firecracker without a single new scene.

Because you want to tell you, my Dead Silence has given me fear. Just remember that Donnie Wahlberg was a sex Idol of young women in the 1990s with New kids On The Block and his brother (Mark Wahlberg was a gift no one model of underwear and was called Marky Mark) and see how they spoil the bodies is sufficient reason to shout the scare.Once passed the child trauma and the death of the myth erotic must say that what comes to be the same film in itself is a tremendous boring and predictable firecracker without a single new scene. A ventriloquist doll appears at the door of a young couple (should be denounced by copying to the Gabbo of the Simpsons television) and clear in less than two minutes there is a murder which carried our protagonist to her hometown to discover a terrible curse recalled anecdotally as a simple fairy tale. From the moment in which pisa first Ravens Fair. Aesthetics, the direction and even treatment of the film seems removed from an episode of supernatural (that Yes, without the two brothers solid floating around the scene) and as such with 40 minutejos we could have vented this tape with more grace and sense of humor.That Yes, now it gives me panic Jose Luis Moreno.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1592

Jeremy Fox

300

muchocine

These defectillos, not as large as it may seem for my comment, do not prevent the viewer passes two entretenidísimas hours of pure cinematic spectacle in which will be without a doubt one of the most remembered films of this year.

It's one of the films most awaited by fans around the world and I could not miss the opportunity of seeing her three weeks in advance, mercy to the invitation sent by Warner Bros. Spain and muchocine.netLa excitement was palpable in the room and was not for less: "300" is based on a prestigious comic of the less prestigious no Frank Miller and is directed by Zack Snyder, whose first film, "Dawn of the dead", was a great cover letter.For many, the story is well known but still I rhubarb unveil too. We are in the year 480 BC and the huge Persian army led by Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) prepares to attack Sparta. With certain political problems that prevent you from bringing together his entire army, the Spartans King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) brings together 300 of his best men and prepares to deal with the Persians in a narrow passage known as Thermopylae. The rest is history, but if you don't know don't you worry because you do not need.If something is raising expectations and is going to give that talk in the film is its visual treatment. I have already heard everything on the subject: if they are cartoons that if everything is computer, if they are painted decorations? My recommendation is that you do not think at all that and simply be carried away by the feast full of force and spectacular images that flood the film. There is no point in any projection in which there is a striking image and little matters if they are generated by computer or not; the result is visually perfect.It is instead what is talking about little other aspects which to me I found outstanding. The sound, for example, is impressive. The storms, the advance of the army of Xerxes or the voices like thunder on the battlefield, echo in the ears as a few times, reaching mingle at some point with the impressive soundtrack of Tyler Bates, that I do not know how it will work without the support of the images, but since then, heard in the film is of the most memorable of recent times.Another aspect that attracts perhaps less attention, as usual in this kind of films, is the interpretation. We must applaud the work of casting because the actors conform to their characters like a glove.Gerard Butler, an actor who always seemed to me that it was missing some strength, put all eggs in one basket and composed a Leonidas very hard and fair at the same time, with an irreproachable honor code (for a Spartan, clear). His voice, his presence, his charisma on screen make us understand that we we have a King who anyone would continue until the same hell. An example of the bottom picture in which the gaze of Butler, only understandable for those who have seen the movie or read the comic, says more than thousand words.Beside it, a Lena Headey beautiful, giving full force of character imaginable in the Queen of Sparta. His character, which would make that a man faced an army only to protect her, stars in the parallel story in Sparta that is sensed but did not on the original comic. This story is very well introduced and has so much interest that is it missing to begin no earlier than it does, because it also serves resting between battles and therefore helps modulate the pace of the film. The rest of the cast meets their roles perfectly but I would like to highlight the imposing presence of Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes (see photo above). Presence that, in addition to the interpretation of the actor, is achieved in two ways. The first is well created that are special effects that make us it appear as a King of more than two metres in height, huge front of Leonidas (already itself high and robust). The second is the tremendous physical transformation of the actor, a guaperas of truth, which hardly recognizes with makeup and digital retouching.But no it has seemed a perfect movie so I will mention the defectillos that I see that they are more feelings than to objective factors. And my feeling is that, in certain moments, the film is too excessive and causes a certain saturation of stimuli in the Viewer.On the other hand, in my opinion what the tape is maremoto lacks of pure emotion. We are witnessing the battles with completely clouded by the visual feast your senses, but that prevents us from thrill us or us to really worry about the evolution of these battles or its protagonists. Speaking of battles, I think that it would have nothing happened if one of them had been trimmed slightly in the editing room.But these defectillos, not as large as it may seem for my comment, do not prevent the viewer passes two entretenidísimas hours of pure cinematic spectacle in which will be without a doubt one of the most remembered films of this year and that shows that Zack Snyder is called to become one of the most important principles of century conductors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4367

elprimerhombre

4 meses, 3 semanas y 2 días

muchocine

The film is picking up interest while it is advancing the plot, mainly thanks to a few very well achieved ellipsis that make it seem that the story is told in real time.

Elprimerhombre went to see 4 months, 3 weeks, 2 days, of Cristian Mungiu, a tough and intelligent film, which addresses the issue of clandestine abortion in Romania in late 1980s. It represents the first installment of the series stories of the golden age, a project of the director, whose objective is to speak of that time without making direct references to communism of Nicolae Ceauşescu, politician, Communist and Romanian dictator who was executed in December 1989, accused of genocide. A shocking fact are objective data that have inspired the film: between 1966 and 1989, i.e., until the end of the Ceausescu dictatorship, more than half a million women died in Romania because of illegal abortions. This film's story focuses on two girls students share room in a residence of a city in Romania. One of them is pregnant and wants to abort. They have everything prepared to perform their duties in a room of a hotel, but things will not go as he had planned. The character of the amiga is essential because the strength of the film lies in it. The director had the luck to find Anamaria Marinca, whose performance is exceptional. After doing theater in Romania, this actress screen debut took place on British television, with "Sex Traffic" production, which provided him a BAFTA Award. Back in Romania, participated in this film which was nominated for the European Film Academy Awards. The director, Cristian Mungiu, before devoting himself to the cinema had been master of English, conducted in 2002, "The West", which won the international award of the filmmakers fortnight in Cannes that same year. But it will be known internationally for this modest production rumano-belga, which won the Golden Palm at the Cannes Festival last year. And perhaps get more movies of their country of origin, that for the first time in 60 years of the festival, a Romanian film wins the famous award. In 1965, a short produced there had already won the Palm. And in a country which only occur in some 15 films per year, it is appreciated to reach our screens films of great caliber as the Mungiu. At the San Sebastian Film Festival it won Grand Prize Fipresci. In the wake of the first fifteen minutes of the start, perhaps a little slow, in which the director fails to catch the Viewer, the greatest achievement of this film is to achieve that interest go picking up while it is advancing the plot, mainly thanks to a few very well achieved ellipsis that make it seem that the story is told in real time. Filmed as a documentary, unaltered, without music (except in the final letters of credit), with the intention of capturing a reality as it is, we find scenes that last about ten minutes where there is a plane fixed, in which the work of the actors is only thing that counts. And, without a doubt, the best are the last twenty minutes, with a forceful level that leaves a mark and an end that invites the Viewer to comment on what happened in the celluloid. A greeting!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2182

Patri

Closer

muchocine

The dialogs have an impressive force, everything is based on them, all the sexual content of the film is in the dialogues.

Closer is a very realistic movie about relationships, usually films dealing with this kind of items sell us things that are lies, however, this film is as the same, sad and hard life.Dialogs have an impressive force, everything is based on them, all the sexual content of the film is in the dialogues, they are intense and so real that at any time the Viewer may feel that he has lived this situation. For the first time spoken clearly and plainly sex in a serious dialogue in the film, finally an adult film about love.The four protagonists are at the height of the story, amazed Julia Roberts, as we are accustomed to seeing in another type of lighter than this film. Here it shows that really know interpret beyond the romantic comedies and proves better than in Erin Brokovich, although an oscar will be for that film.Jude Law conveys much with his eyes and Natalie Portman outboard his role as enigmatic and at the same time fragile girl. Clive Owen plays the role of a dermatologist you bastaste rude and brusque, incidentally, the voice that fold you in Spanish seems a bit painful, is too neutral, after seeing her in folded, and original version I think it loses enough with dubbing.In short, Closer is a highly recommended film for the richness of its characters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4194

Ramón Balcells

Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión

muchocine

I stay with the feeling of having seen an exceptional, original film (though it is sometimes go by the branches of the topical) and with a pulse Ripper, being the second film by Joe Wright, a director of which, I am sure that will provide us with a real masterpiece very soon.

There are films that, despite its visual elegance retailer, fail to reach the depth that would touch them to become great. Atonement: Beyond passion (go added title so admirable to have been here) it has an absolutely stunning visual section, with a truly outstanding photography and an atmosphere of more accurate, but also has one of the best scripts seen in time (despite being based on the aclamadísima novel by Ian McEwan), incredibly deep and with some touches that end up to round out this captivating story. While we went through all this, we might suppose that this film seems a masterpiece. Pity some excesses by director Joe Wright, that despite this, manages to carry out scenes which we have to get the hat. Where more lacked passion this Atonement is probably in its middle part, when the protagonist is in the war, his girlfriend awaits you and while the girl of discord, and age of majority, is dedicated to caring for war wounded. This part, as well as topical, is where the filmmaker is left take a pulse so far never seen showing scenes that we know of memory (with the exception of the master flat military sequence and Briony visit the serious wounded) and somewhat boring. Despite this, Atonement: beyond the passion contains a first time bright, respond and majestic, which leaves the viewer with a tremendous desire to see what will happen afterwards. A complex, entrevesada and ambitious plot of love, loyalty and jealousy starring some stupendous Knightley and McAvoy, while continuing to ignore the vision of an imaginative girl, excellently played by Saoirse Ronan. And after those slow and almost inconsequential three quarters of an hour, Wright returns with his harrowing expiation of guilt, with several magical and memorable sequences as Briony visit to the apartment of his sister or the epilogue with an impressive Vanessa Redgrave. Unfortunately, this last part is shorter, with which we have a film somewhat irregular, although it never becomes bad, quite the contrary. My opinion may not be the same as others, and perhaps what to my seemed great to others will have seemed it incredibly tedious, and vice versa. Nevertheless, the film is full of emotion and complexity, it is adult at all times (no, not treat us as naive children) and contains one of the most sad and at the same time brilliant endings ever seen. All of it, cannot be forgotten, accompanied by a melancholy and wonderful soundtrack to Dario Marianelli. so therefore, this magnificent film deserves be acclaimed and seen by anyone who appreciate not only the technical aspect, also writing and the nuances in which must be set to end to understand the abysmal final sentences. I stay with the feeling of having seen an exceptional, original film (though it is sometimes go by the branches of the topical) and with a pulse Ripper, being the second film by Joe Wright, a director of which, I am sure that will provide us with a real masterpiece very soon.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2553

Francisco Bellón

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

The Simpsons: The movie is full of acid and irreverent humor so characteristic of the series, and has some truly hilarious and surreal sequences

They were born more than 20 years ago as a comic strip in a popular American television show. Two years later they gained independence and the animated series and the longest-lived comedy series in the history of American television was born. At this point, is it can what the Simpsons that has not been said already? After almost 400 episodes, the most extravagant family of Springfield makes the leap to the film in the midst of great excitement around the world.The Simpsons are already more than an animated series, already part of the culture of millions of people, and many are already unable to imagine a world without the Simpsons. Homer Simpson has become a real icon for several generations in the last two decades. What brings this film which will not bring the series? Nothing new, that on the other hand was to be expected. The big question was whether it would be to live up to expectations, and must say Yes. The Simpsons: The movie is full of acid and irreverent humor so characteristic of the series, and has some truly hilarious and surreal sequences. And how, always is not Homer, which with his clumsiness and stupidity will start the louder laughter of a given audience.There is no doubt that it will be one of the greatest taquillazos of 2007, and possibly of all time. From here we launched a warning to sailors, concluding credit titles bring some very juicy surprises, and it is worth waiting a few minutes in the armchair of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3956

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Pickpocket

muchocine

What fascinates of Bresson, of this Pickpocket is his poetic breath, his lyrical, this fascination with stories moved by very tenuous threads, but strong in memory...

Someone warned me long ago that Bresson film was so rich as to enjoy a morning on a bench in a park reading a book about Existentialism. That or similar thing. I had the pleasure of knowing the work by the French director, I accepted the simile, smiled and kept in memory the hyperbole, the Baroque and offensive joke at the bottom. Bresson was I never throw away and the years were passed without that I could say and refute or applaud the assertion of my friend. They have had to spend 20 years (up or down) so I check the scope of the phrase occupied a little space of my memory, but that was not going. Last night I saw Pickpocket. Soon he turns fifty. I saw a film honest, thorough, raised as a research, as a choking snatched exercise of wizard who try their tricks and meets your highest level of formal appearance, a demanding in literature, in the meanings, cinema but little or no leaning to the will of theatricality that sometimes a film and it makes, by the impostada demandin a fictional event, false, alien life or, in any case, disaffected from the triviality of life, of his normal. The cinema of Bresson is pure life, physical, organic, life masculinizada, feminized seeds, animalizada, vegetalizada, urbanized, but life within. Or perhaps cinema of Bresson is not none of this and yes it is Pickpocket, this story of bland hero of autobiographical whose journey through the city in his craft of vulgar ratero, narrates a story with many elements, but in a very simple way. What can not count the words, tells the silence, the gesture, the look, the movement of the hands (our hero is a thief) and the feeling always present that literature and film are intimately twinned as a genre saved report of a fact and driving that information in a way more creative (artistic, beautiful). The format is what changes: all ends hosted in our brain, which processes the data as known or as have taught you).The intellectual obsessed with the pillería of Pickpocket is a curious type: steals to gain a few quarters and steals to enhance his ego or, in other words, to convert the looting in artwork, creative, in an act of beauty element. (Sick mother, the secondary girlfriend) life is dependent on this vandalism with pedigree. There is a purge which empties into a purity, a primary instinct that enlightens a perfection and she throws all signs of vitality, all evidence of passion. Michel is a purist, a genius in his own, a kind of magician who has elevated his misdeeds, his crime a little naïve, to a superior state, as the artist when he picks up a folio blank, a Virgin canvas or a piece of mud.The suggestion more than explicitness, leads all the footage. The apparent reduction of elements, this plot or formal simplicity, part of a film need blinded in fragment (hands, gestures, eyes).It is the idea that the end of the story is irrelevant: that the character already has written an end and that everything you note no longer an obviable extension, an objectionable Appendix will not alter what we already know from the first minutes. Pickpocket is a difficult and demanding Ribbon: you can not go to their projection with mental relaxation of cinema that now fills us with, and I know I incurro in an unforgivable exaggeration. Pickpocket is a great film, one of those that lasts much more than the precise time in which we are witnessing its representation in our memory. That, perhaps, should be a good film, which lasts, which modeled us the character and brand us behaviour patterns, forms of life.Seen one in this dizzying time of convoluted processes of Assembly and Baroque visual style, this economy of means, this need for depriving the Fund so it ballast.Long also I do not see my friend and these are other ages to taste a film of these dimensions. I don't know if everything is on a morning in a park reading a book about Existentialism. Perhaps. It will be the requirement that he did not know given, I think now. It will be a thing to see us one day and discuss without haste.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2814

Rafa Ferrer

Sigo como Dios

muchocine

Tom Shadyac is typical director of family comedies, and this is no exception, typical comedy that will like the kids of the House, and the elderly will have to bear a tape without being round makes water everywhere, and is that the script has been prepared or filming is clearly something that is worth remembering.

Say at this stage that I love Jim Carrey is extra, since all those who read me regularly know of my philias and phobias, as well, in this second installment in which Carrey said something as well as "upload here and you pedal (or give me more pasta") have to the recently booming Steve Carrell, lengthened the character who made the first delivery to the role, needless to say that Carrell fails even to touch the histrionics of Ontario (Canada) but in his role as Evan Baxter this nice, restrained at times and quite achieved elsewhere.Those who've followed even above the Filmography of Carrell, know he is a complete specialist in portraying normal men (both in "Virgin at 40" as always recommended in "Little miss Sunshine"), and although Evan Baxter is a Senator of the States, here, once again, is a normal name got into a mess of heavenly proportions.Tom Shadyac is typical director of family comedies, and this is not an exception, typical comedy that will like the kids of the House, and the elderly will have to bear a tape without being round makes water everywhere, which is that, or the script has been developed, or filming (one of the more expensive current film) is clearly something that is worth remembering.Too bad a film that promised everything and once again is nothing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4242

Victor Bilbao

El hijo de la pradera

muchocine

The best film of the singular actor William S. Hart, which began in the theatre represent nothing less than Shakespeare's. With 44 years she began playing Cowboys in movies and did well by its management with the horse.

"A cowboy, accustomed to go alone for life without more roof to the sky and more House than the green meadows, meets a girl and falls in love." Thus, decides to fight to achieve a ground to live with her. "" To succeed you must take part in a mad rush to reach the promised land".""Tumbleweeds" is the best film of the singular actor William S. Hart, which began in the theatre represent nothing less than Shakespeare's. With 44 years she began playing Cowboys in movies and did well by its management with the horse.This film is a great movie, the best western of the silent era, an ode to the pioneers of the West, highlighting their human values, their desire to start a new life. The race towards his dream scenes are spectacular, very well shot, with verve. The rest is so pleasant, not tired the viewer at any time. Excellent photography, naturally in black and white. William S. Hart accompany him in this unique western Barbara Bedford, Lucien Littlefield, and/or j. Gordon Russell.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1061

Ramón Balcells

Babel

muchocine

Alejandro González Iñárritu has worn once again with this stunning universal drama that will not leave indifferent any (I hope that ye may be many) to see. It is not perfect, but however thats what makes it be more intimate.

There are people that is repetitive and pedantic, charisma and nothing creative. The prodigious tandem formed by Alejandro González Iñárritu and Guillermo Arriaga might say that it fails none of these adjectives, i.e. just the opposite: times repeat the structure of his films (and three with the same go), will never prove to be tired. The trick? Here there is no trick. One is born as it arises, and this pair of geniuses are born as they were born. After loves dogs (which I have pending see immediately) and 21 grams (that dramón destroys the day to anyone and yet is formidable), Iñárritu and Arriaga have decided to finish the trilogy of the (in) communication with Babel. As well as the first stood at Mexico, the director's native country, the second was American ground and stood in a city in the country. The last step not an only ground, but pisa different and scattered around the world (Morocco, Mexico, Japan and United States). So we could call to Babel as a universal film at the same time, obviously speaking of isolation and despair, although in a somewhat moderate way - latter-, to be Iñárritu, clear. I will explain. 21 Grams drama that was presented was a caliber, for me, surpassing the hardness. It was an incredibly dramatic film. But in Babel, perhaps what has taken more care has been transmission through aesthetics and not the extreme dramatization. And that for my has been a relief. Not because the other was bad, I already commented before or much less, but I think that so many things had both left the viewer with a depression of horse. So let's talk about aesthetics. As in all author film, Babel presents a dazzling, atrapadora, aesthetic varied (never better said) and overwhelming (in many cases). But as in all film of author, the plot of the film, or rather, the history is reflected by its aesthetics. Therefore, the tape of Iñárritu is a story (or rather several or a fragmented) with an aesthetic impregnated with it really disconcerting. I believe that this conseguidísima aesthetics is due to the frequent change of situations, countries and cultures. For example: the director has chosen a type specific and different from millimeters to shoot each country. What I do not know is how many millimeters has shot each, up there fail. But what this makes clear is that this perfectionist filmmaker, part of storytelling we creepily located in different worlds and cultures, wheel each one of them with a particular aesthetic. So in short, say that Babel presents several different aesthetics who narrowly that look like, qualify for the film of extremely detailed.The history of the Tower of Babel told the story of a group of men who wanted to build a tower that exceeded the limit of the sky, the power of God. For this reason, it punished them changing the language to each one so that they could not be understood and, therefore, they could not build the tower. Alejandro González Iñárritu and Guillermo Arriaga have used this idea to create the basis of its history, so deduced before seeing, could promise much. I see her and dazzles me, but I do not know why, get me the feeling that this isolation posed not reflected in some respects (or more, well, not her I have found). Well, these "some" are reduced to one, then the only story that has no relationship to the incommunicado detention (for my) is of Moroccan children. Though perhaps I that do not see, but since then I see this terrible media relations like Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, of the Japanese girl with almost everyone (it is precisely sordomuda, which further complicates things) and the more than obvious isolation between the Americans and Mexicans (véa is sublime onstage of the border). So the only bug that I see Babel is this lack of isolation that promised so much advertising for the film and that however, in one of the Central stories, not be presence. In any case, this is a film of complex analización, so if this small detail not clear to me, it is because of so complex that is, I have not captured or simply isn't.As the previous two films of the trilogy, Babel is a puzzle of stories that intersect each other. Although the focal point of all the stories here is this metaphor of the Tower of Babel, Iñárritu has not hesitated to structure the film in a manner similar to the others: messy and entrecruzada. However, as with the violence and drama, the filmmaker has moderated and has chosen to structure their film in an orderly and siutable. I think this option is completely in favour, either by own understanding (21 grams should see it at least twice to capture it from beginning to end) or simply to moderate and focus more on the history and not on him frantic movement of sequences. We, Babel, really a film that is understood and heard as understood and hear life itself. Babel is without a doubt, the closest thing to the confusions and problems facing us today in our lives. As always, Alexander has been surrounded by a brilliant cast with actors belonging to his native country. What more clashes here is the emergence of the, already not so star Brad Pitt, which undoubtedly makes a formidable role full of tension and suffering. Cate Blanchett, who plays his wife, in the few moments that appears normal speaking (before it receives the shot) is also great, although I must admit that then does very well sufferer mother - not for bleeding - for their children who are at the other end of the planet. Gael García Bernal (who had already worked with the director on loves dogs) it makes an unforgettable interpretation with an ending that one since you can imagine. But that for my stressed above all is Adriana Barraza (who also appeared in the first film of the director), portraying the nanny of the children of Pitt and Blanchett who commits a huge imprudence which will have to save it on your own. Certainly makes a magnificent role which I hope gets Golden Globe. Rinku Kikuchi (Japanese actress who plays the young sordomuda) also makes excellent work, even if you have a role for me, too unsympathetic (my hobbies, or at least I think). The rest of the cast is equally excellent, even if you have actors who are not practically known (highlighting, for example, Koji Yakusho, Japanese actor with quite a reputation in your country). Within the technical aspects, the beautiful picture of the usual collaborator of director Rodrigo Prieto and breathtaking music highlight of the also associate Gustavo Santaolalla, presenting a series of really precious items.In short: Babel is an essential film (probably one of the best of the year) where circumstances produced are the result of pure chance. It has a few performances that exceed the normal and an unbeatable aesthetic. Alejandro González Iñárritu has worn once again with this stunning universal drama that will not leave indifferent any (I hope that ye may be many) to see. It is not perfect, but however thats what makes it be more intimate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/780

Silvia Giner

El camino de los ingleses

muchocine

The film is very well directed, that is undeniable, but despite the good things that I have told you, I did not like.

Well, last night I was passing for scholars of "camino de los Ingleses". This is my verdict. This is without a doubt one of the criticisms that more work has cost me perform, not is whether this will be significant. This film is based on the famous novel by Antonio Soler, awarded the Nadal in 2004 and that Antonio Banderas as director, adapted for the cinema in a rather peculiar way.Seemed notable the way that you have chosen Antonio to tell us this story which in my opinion is quite vulgar. In this case I'm more with how to with what.This story than a principle (what said of the way of telling things), may seem a real mental, tells straw with the deep voice of Fran Perea (congratulations Fran) the crossroads of teenage lives that meet at a point of the way of life in which decisions away from the fate that had fixed, in order to escape their sad reality and achieve their dreams, the camino de los ingleses, shown as allegory in the materialization of a street of Málaga excess of sex that I got to be even grotesque in some scenes. An ode of Andalusian, with the rescue of the best actors that has given this land, as Juan Diego, a native of Bormujos (Sevilla).To highlight the direction of actors, which found me very good, it shows the involvement of Antonio at this point and the picture beautiful on many occasions. As a lover of the flat burned, I have to admit that fascinated me one final sequences with Victoria Abril (great by the way) and Alberto Amarilla FACE to FACE. Albert, I mean I liked his performance, the expressiveness of his eyes, this is an actor that communicates that comes to you, although you have to improve some techniques. Without a doubt the worst of this distribution is María Ruiz, excessively higher in camera, for the role (bags, Crow's feet and lines of expression included) this actress that we have previously seen in "The amazing world of Borjamari and Pocholo", not just convince me, its performance is mediocre and transducer? big mistake its presence in this film, eye, this does not mean it is bad actress, simply that are not adequate either your profile or your interpretation. Absolutely all the supporting actors, seem greater for the role that interpret, all, except one as the grandfather, the body (great Maria Nieto) and some more, in particular referring to adolescents, we continue insulting the audience putting actors in 28 years to play the role of a boy of 19? regrettable, little credibility and total nightmare giving wanting to flee with dread of the room.I liked this incursion of flags as director that the film is very well directed, this is undeniable, but despite the good things I have cash, not liked. Those who do not like the cinema that will not see, because this is no doubt a tape of author. Band sound, curious and evocative.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2160

JLO

Batman begins

muchocine

The end result is overwhelming: lots of action, pretty emotion, a careful music, the best possible Batman, best costume and an excellent script.

Christhoper Nolan Batman leaves the previous versions as mere sketches, or only weak close-ups of the essence of the bat man and his dream-like world.It is not that the two Tim Burton are now badly - came with vitality to the real Batman away from the clown television-but that his lauded darkness and vision are superseded by this new version (and safely) years light of the latest Queers who managed to Schumacher with the character, considered - along with Superman and Mickey Mouse - as the best fictional story creations.Nor does one have to be a fan of the comic or the character in order to enjoy this entertaining film. Nolan (capable of imaginative Memento and the bureaucratic white nights), demonstrates versatility, good management of the action and the Assembly and correct insight into both Visual and the script together together to David Goyer (lover of comics as he demonstrated with interventions in the scripts of the three Blade (addressing the last), The Crow)(, Nick Fury and the impending Flash and Ghost Rider), that make possible a first time without the gloomy, without that diminished with this interest or the end result. The introduction is agile and explanatory, and lays groundwork for a Batman more mature in its conception. This influenced by the eighties comics by Frank Miller (mainly by "Batman: year one"), author who established an image more it lasts and raw of the hero, as well as revitalize it.Much has to do with the result the excellent choice - and performance - the Welsh Christian Bale, stage actor little known despite his extensive career, that becomes here the point of reference. The earlier child protagonist of the Empire of the Sun, where also lost in her childhood her parents (and more here of the failed reign of fire, Shaft and American psycho), puts the body and the face to become - without discussion - the definitive Batman by presence and performance. Only with the first time acted more and better than all other Batman together. Gotham is dark, night, daytime and sharp, without clash. The Gallery of side actors of renown (Neeson, Freeman, Caine, Oldman, Hauer) intimidated by his interpretive quality, achieving not be only filled with a super production of this type. Performances couples, confirming the Irish Cillian Murphy (extermination leading actor), here in the role of the villain named scarecrow. Both the origin and various accessories - car, batcomputer, gadgets and the famous and reviled costume - are based on a credible and well-founded basis. Difficult to find weak points, perhaps an excessive - but spectacular - car chase on ceilings. More can not ask you one such Hollywood adaptation.The end result is overwhelming: lots of action, pretty emotion, a careful music, the best possible Batman, best costume, an excellent script. Ah, you want to! to return the Joker also!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1065

Francisco Bellón

La casa de tus sueños

muchocine

The House of your dreams is a film so ruinous and shameful as the House of the title.

We are a few hours of finishing one year and begin a new one, and it is inevitable that people currently do a certain balance of the year to be. This year has been good, not to say excellent, for cinema that we have seen in our country, both national and foreign. If you have to put a but is the shortage of comedies of height, with the almost annual exception of Woody Allen. In this regard, little or nothing can be expected from Hollywood, in 2006 Spanish film has focused more on dramas, so the door has been open pair in pair to European comedies. This is therefore a genre almost extinction, in modern cinema, a good comedy is more rare to find a four-leaf clover on the roof of any skyscraper. The House of your dreams has been the last in a long list of French comedies released in our country this year, which include this great fiasco of Francis Veber called the game the idiots, and that more than acceptable tender and romantic entitled story you are very handsome. One of the most socorridos topics relating to the comedies is that it is harder to make you laugh that cry, and hardened by the experience one has to surrender to the evidence: it is true, it is easier to make desperate mourn and bitterly, especially if tapes are seen as the home of your dreams. There are comedies that not only is that they do not have the slightest grace, or dabble, but serve as a cruel martyrdom for those most in need of distraction and laughter. Dany Boon, a popular comedian in the neighbouring country, made his debut in the direction with the adaptation of a play itself, which chronicles the misadventures of a poor type to buy a country house. Not have passed many minutes so that the Viewer is account of the shortage of originality and mediocrity of the proposal. However, appears a faint ray of hope called Daniel Prèvost; with each appearance his character the film seems to go back slightly, but more by the skill of Prèvost and memories of true inspector of finance and its a "Bully" wine drinks which for the screenplay of Boon. And then comes the comic nucleus of the story, the reforms of the casa de campo. Suffice it to say that dialogues and situations of any episode of that series of Vicente Escrivá seem to extruding film the Marx Brothers in comparison with similar succession of desprópositos. If of alone weren't enough the calamities that offers the film, the inexperience of Dany Boon in the direction causes a total lack of pace, not to mention its interpretation, flat, the protagonist. The House of your dreams is a film so ruinous and shameful as the House of the title, and from here we strongly recommend that all those unhappy that sudan blood to pay a mortgage to refrain from seeing the film, because it will provoke a furious anger in them, and leave the rooms with the bloodshot eyes blood and a big thirst for revenge.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/5

Torbe

Spiderman 2

muchocine

Putting to give birth a movie that has nothing

It is a pain this film. I'm already going with fear. Second first by long queues, see who you get to the side, and third by the scripts each time more gilipollescos is curran. Film is falling sharply, as TV, as the publishing world, where any gualtrapa that only leave on TV you "write" a "book". Spider-man is to take the Director and give four Ostia. Do but beside the point that gets you so much philosophy of healing in the mouth of many characters in the movie?, we want to let a little live?. I am going to the cinema to see Spider-man as trashing bad guys, not to enmierdarme in their private lives and their psychological problems. Suda me her girlfriend of Spider-man, that lerda, with face of pastora de los montes of Usurbil think he fucks not never, and it is a pretentious which tells at the end that will save lives, and he rides a chicken because it has not been able to go see his shit play. But what kind of character is this? Menuda subnor? And the old? A menace that not to give consejillos in plan Reverend Smith, go to give advice to your fucking old Woodcock! Put the TV and leave me in peace, heavy. And Spider-man, often tontolava, a superhero that does not have a fucking hard. Learn from Batman, that this forrao in the batcomputer becoming straw without doing anything to spying on the neighbors with camcorders is that already get me to the eggs, be devoted to catch bad guys and instead it is not capable of doing that they seized the House to his aunt May. Anda and give you ass, mediocre. Beam as octopus, steals there something and leave us in peace, llorona, which do not stop to give the pain in the ass the movie with that face of mico you, hijoputa. It is revealing that not leave the cloth of spider, that in my town is called gatillazo, and is that it is normal, it is a fucking freak, a lerdo. It is someone only when Gets the mask of Spider-man. It is as many people in real life, which is not nobody but gets a remarkable thing in the movie "mask" is the action that is of puta madre, and when Spider comes and goes by the buildings flying. And bumps of humor, there are several, primarily starring the Editor of the newspaper, a character that perfectly represents the typical cabronazo agarrao not giving anything for nothing. Brilliant the good observer vera that the movie alterna action-relationship. Fucking great action, come paqui palla, however when it gets the absurd and bland relationship between the pastor and the mico, the movie falls limits up unexpected. Dan embarrassed the two, as they can be so asshole? Is it that they do not know the meaning of the word blowjob or Castilian pajon? Not, in these movies not sex they get nowhere near, are all about bows and give ass all the time, but clear, guys want to reach everyone, and they understand that children have no sexuality, when in the 1980s, when many of us we went to the cinema or TV saw, saw things more jevys, or what the helltoday itself, any put TV at 6 pm and you will see a lot of poison incredible beings anonymous talking about how he fucked with this or the other. I will not talk about this movie, sorry for this desproposito. It pisses me off having paid for such mierdon, the next time down me the internet and pay movie supu. They give to Spider-man, the idol of my youth in the comics, is going to see Spider-Man 3 his cousin of Atapuerca...

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3527

Iñaki Bilbao

Un tranvía llamado deseo

muchocine

One of the best works of master Elia Kazan.

"Blache arrives in New York to visit his sister." There met Stanley, husband of his sister, a tough and virile man. "Man shall have no consideration for his sister-in-law".Excellent film master Elia Kazan. Certainly one of his best works and which you gave the world fame to its male protagonist, Marlon Brando. This already played the role of the rough Kowalsky on stage with Kim Hunter. Same as the great Karl Malden. Therefore the three are as well, because they knew imply their roles. However Kazan wished that the film star was not Hunter but Vivien Leigh. I am not going to say if it was better or worse because you never know, but the work of Leigh there is for posterity.A work dense, harsh, unforgiving, with magnificent dialogues, wonderful sunset scene and wise leadership.A real lesson of the film that is never forgotten, above all its striking final.Excellent music of the great Alex North, who introduced for the first time in film as a film, the jazz soundtrack. I did in this film, which was a world event which, however, was not recognized in the most important awards given to the film. Another stain on the curriculum of North, who was nominated for the Oscars nothing less than fifteen times, and did not win more than the honorific gave fellow that did know of the mass the average good.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/307

Tito Chinchan

Ultravioleta

muchocine

Lots of action, many dead, but leaves the feeling of existential vacuum before so much violence without coming to story. In other words, that a milestone kilo I've swallowed without eating or drinking.

According to legend in the inscriptions on the sword of the Miss Violet (ultra not be that comes) the formula to create gold, the secret of who killed Kenedy, as a simple waiter in Spain can happen in a few years to be one of the largest fortunes in the country and things are written. But no one who has come far enough to the edge has managed to remain a piece and then tell. They imagined what will the movie.The film is a future world in which a virús created by man to soldiers that kill more and better, has become a part of the society hemófagos (who eat blood). As often happens in these cases, a Union between military and doctors has resulted a dictatorship that handles very strictly the designs of humanity. For a change, those who want to exterminate been nail and engaged in slaughtering human. Do hodgepodge comes ultraviolet which kills throughout the film to not less than a thousand beings humanos.¿Que can say that not you supongais already? Let's start with the positive side. I liked much small details, like the mobile phones of the future, and generally of little things which we premiered when the virus that extends. The action of the principle is pretty well, although it finishes running, giving step by an absolute soplapollez, in which the cruel and ruthless killer gets out her feelings for a child. All this giving meneos sword to all who arrima. And finally it ends in a few sudden jumps between fast-paced action and the noñeces that do not come to mind. And the script no mata, no. Moreover, it is too predictable.In short, lots of action, many dead, but the feeling of existential vacuum before so much violence without coming to story that leaves you, has made my inner peace see cracked. Or in other words, that a milestone kilo I've swallowed without eating or drinking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2850

Naty Buqué

El milagro de P. Tinto

muchocine

Excellent comedy Spanish of the late 1990s, El milagro de p. Tinto has the best faces I saw in a long time in the film, and also excellent performances.

Excellent comedy Spanish of the late 1990s, El milagro de p. Tinto has 1. A simple humor, another rather violent, visual, surprise, and a third a bit more excruciating, which includes social commentary not naïve, although without reaching the cinismo.2. An enviable production and, above all, a careful absolute aesthetic, where art and photography desulmbran by its beauty, tidiness and surprise in the context of a comedy of this ilk (I say, Comedy Comedy, that make people laugh out loud, and not comedy drama or comedy, which outlines smiles). 3. The best faces I saw in a long time in the film, and also excellent performances. In other words, a casting of puta madre.In short, a film more, much more than recommended.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2581

Oscar Cantero

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

After years of waiting, Hommer devotees are in luck by being able to enjoy it in size XXL. The film is almost unimportant.

Few could imagine something more than 20 years ago, when they began to appear the Simpsons Tracey Ullman programme, that two decades later, these guys would form part of the daily life of half the world, and that there are almost 500 episodes, thousands of objects with their faces and phrases, clubs of followers fans and even a feature film.Matt Groening series has become the benchmark of animation for adults, and its shadow have grown up other projects that have tried to follow his footsteps, without ever reaching the height reached by the series of the Fox in wit, nor in originality or charisma. Now, when it recently announced the issuance of the season 19, Simpsons the movie premieres. Bring cinema to Hommer and theirs, it was in the mind of Fox for years, but opposition to the project from Groening slowed its development. There is no denying that the film has all the ingredients that have become runaway success to the saga, and that its interest is accentuated by the fact of being able to enjoy the adventures of the yellow family on the big screen. On the contrary, it may come too late, when the imagination of writers starts to show signs of exhaustion and plot quality of recent seasons has begun to wane. The film is not bad, and as a curiosity it is interesting, because it retains the transgressive and critical tone that have become immortal. Perhaps shows the Fox more fearful of the response of the general public that usual and therefore focuses on estates generally indiscriminate sarcastic exits as the Church that today seems more vulnerable to attacks. Nevertheless, welcome Simpson.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/950

Alberto Concepción

El Pianista

muchocine

A gem of a film. One of the best films of the last decade. The conjunction Polanski/Brody make that "The pianist" is one of the best films and performances of the last decade.

Few are films nor books, that have been made about Jewish stories of the nazi era. But despite this abundance, the truth is that we are particularly and with the permission of the rest, with two big films. One of them is "The list of Schlinder" by Steven Spielberg. The other is "The pianist" by Roman Polanski. While the two are true cinema, I tend towards the second.It is curious that both managers have Jewish origin. Or not. But the truth is that, thanks to this facet, both get deeply connect with the spectator. "And regret that the subject invites ello.es undoubtedly its quality as directors what comes to qualify them as such.""The pianist" is cinema in its purest form. It impresses you, hits you, makes you sentir.vivo. Numerous and well-known are the stories of Jews who lived through the Holocaust. But there are many possible ways to transmit them and Roman Polanski has done the best possible.Polanski tells the story of the great Polish pianist Wladyslaw Szpilman (Adrien Brody) who, like millions of Jews, suffered the consequences of Nazism. The film shows, from the vision of a single person, life in the Warsaw ghetto and his subsequent survival. Without loss of detail, all the cruelty we show as what they are, or were, reality.Viewed from inside, ghetto with his hardness. It is inevitable to not feel a strong connection with the protagonist as the story progresses. Not only for the great performance which saw Adrien Brody the Academy Award for best actor and his consecration as such, but also to see situations that has soportar.que must live and the director has managed to translate so brilliantly, taking him to also get the Oscar for that address.Uses their own experiences to add more details and realism to the film because many of the scenes featured in the film, when Szpilman and his family moved to the ghetto, were lived by the own Polanski.La film can be divided into two halves: the first, magnificent, more focused on life in the ghetto, in trying to convey how it was, through the experiences of our pianist and his family. In the second part, equally splendid, Szpilman becomes the center of the story: we see the passing of the events from their eyes, we heard by his ears (something in what the director intended to emphasize, as when momentarily loses the hearing to a nearby bomb), ultimately, makes us feel what he feels, live what he lives.And you get it. And not only with the technical and personal direction that the director gives, but also by having an actor of the stature of Adrien Brody, who took the role, who learned piano to interpret some fragments of the works of Chopin which featured in the film so seriously lost 15 kilos and even sell part of their property and live alone to feelat least in a manner roughly, who lived Spilzman. Gestures, the voz.tantos are the details that Brody plays so brilliantly that they make the film win integers, although them already had won.Music deserves special mention. The soundtrack of the film is exclusively of works by Chopin, whose romantic and drama-laden notes add the perfect touch to the already on its impressive setting of the film. The melodies of the composer are fantastically performed by Janusz Olejniczack, and fits in each of the situations experienced by Szpilman, to the point of getting a perfect identification between the two.In short: the Polanski/Brody conjunction makes "The pianist" one of the best films and performances of the last decade.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2968

Rafa Delgado

The Queen

muchocine

Helen Mirren offers one of the best roles of his career, and one of the most interesting and noteworthy of all interpretations 2006.

Very interesting proposal by Stephen Frears on how he lived the tragedy of the death of Lady Diana of Wales Queen Elizabeth II of England, along with his family, and the newly elected by then Prime Minister Tony Blair.La address is very correct and elegant with a hint of brilliance, which knows very well to maintain the type during the hour and a half and little more than hard film. The cast is great from beginning to end, emphasizing on above all Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II: one of the best roles of his career and one of the most interesting and remarkable of the year performances.However, becomes a tad long and pesadita, and can it not connect at all with some viewers.