|
--- |
|
language: en |
|
license: cc-by-4.0 |
|
source_datasets: curated |
|
task_categories: |
|
- tabular-classification |
|
- tabular-regression |
|
tags: |
|
- chemistry |
|
- cheminformatics |
|
pretty_name: Mutagenicity Optimization |
|
dataset_summary: >- |
|
The mutagenicity dataset consists of a training set with 6862 molecules and a test set with 1714 molecules. |
|
The train and test datasets were created after sanitizing and splitting the original dataset in the paper below. |
|
Additionally, there is a validation dataset containing 1469 molecules that were not involved in the training set. |
|
citation: >- |
|
@article {, |
|
author = {Lou, C., Yang, H., Deng, H. et al.}, |
|
title = {Chemical rules for optimization of chemical mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis and machine learning methods}, |
|
journal = {Journal of Cheminformatics}, |
|
year = {2023}, |
|
volume = {15}, |
|
number = {35} |
|
} |
|
size_categories: |
|
- 10K<n<100K |
|
config_names: |
|
- train_test |
|
- validation |
|
configs: |
|
- config_name: train_test |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: train |
|
path: train_test/train.csv |
|
- split: test |
|
path: train_test/test.csv |
|
- config_name: validation |
|
data_files: |
|
- split: validation |
|
path: validation/validation.csv |
|
dataset_info: |
|
- config_name: train_test |
|
features: |
|
- name: SMILES |
|
dtype: string |
|
- name: ID |
|
dtype: int64 |
|
- name: endpoint |
|
dtype: |
|
class_label: |
|
names: |
|
0: 0 |
|
1: 1 |
|
- name: MW |
|
dtype: float64 |
|
splits: |
|
- name: train |
|
num_bytes: 219712 |
|
num_examples: 6862 |
|
- name: test |
|
num_bytes: 54976 |
|
num_examples: 1714 |
|
- config_name: validation |
|
features: |
|
- name: SMILES |
|
dtype: string |
|
- name: endpoint |
|
dtype: |
|
class_label: |
|
names: |
|
0: 0 |
|
1: 1 |
|
--- |
|
|
|
# Mutagenicity Optimization (MutagenLou2023) |
|
|
|
In the original paper, they collected the Ames records from Hansen’s benchmark (6512 compounds) and the ISSSTY database (6052 compounds). |
|
After data preparation, a total of 8576 compounds with structural diversity were obtained, including 4643 Ames positives and 3933 Ames negatives. |
|
The comprehensive data set was then split into a training set including 7720 compounds and a test set containing 856 compounds. |
|
Overall, the numbers of negatives and positives in this data set were balanced with a ratio of 0.847 (Neg./Pos.). |
|
In addition, 805 approved drugs from DrugBank that were not involved in the training set, and 664 Ames strong positive samples |
|
from DGM/NIHS were built as an external validation set. |
|
|
|
## Data splits |
|
Here we have used the Realistic Split method described in [(Martin et al., 2018)](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00166) to split the MutagenLou2023 dataset. |
|
|
|
## Quickstart Usage |
|
|
|
### Load a dataset in python |
|
Each subset can be loaded into python using the Huggingface [datasets](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/index) library. |
|
First, from the command line install the `datasets` library |
|
|
|
$ pip install datasets |
|
|
|
then, from within python load the datasets library |
|
|
|
>>> import datasets |
|
|
|
and load one of the `MutagenLou2023` datasets, e.g., |
|
|
|
>>> train_test = datasets.load_dataset("maomlab/MutagenLou2023", name = "train_test") |
|
Downloading readme: 100%|██████████| 7.15k/7.15k [00:00<00:00, 182kB/s] |
|
Downloading data: 100%|██████████| 306k/306k [00:00<00:00, 4.45MkB/s] |
|
Downloading data: 100%|██████████| 115k/115k [00:00<00:00, 668kkB/s] |
|
Generating train split: 100%|██████████| 6862/6862 [00:00<00:00, 70528.05examples/s] |
|
Generating test split: 100%|██████████| 1714/1714 [00:00<00:00, 22632.33 examples/s] |
|
|
|
and inspecting the loaded dataset |
|
|
|
>>> train_test |
|
DatasetDict({ |
|
train: Dataset({ |
|
features: ['SMILES', 'ID', 'endpoint', 'MW'], |
|
num_rows: 6862 |
|
}) |
|
test: Dataset({ |
|
features: ['SMILES', 'ID', 'endpoint', 'MW'], |
|
num_rows: 1714 |
|
}) |
|
}) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Use a dataset to train a model |
|
One way to use the dataset is through the [MolFlux](https://exscientia.github.io/molflux/) package developed by Exscientia. |
|
First, from the command line, install `MolFlux` library with `catboost` and `rdkit` support |
|
|
|
pip install 'molflux[catboost,rdkit]' |
|
|
|
then load, featurize, split, fit, and evaluate the a catboost model |
|
|
|
import json |
|
from datasets import load_dataset |
|
from molflux.datasets import featurise_dataset |
|
from molflux.features import load_from_dicts as load_representations_from_dicts |
|
from molflux.splits import load_from_dict as load_split_from_dict |
|
from molflux.modelzoo import load_from_dict as load_model_from_dict |
|
from molflux.metrics import load_suite |
|
|
|
split_dataset = load_dataset('maomlab/MutagenLou2023', name = 'train_test') |
|
|
|
split_featurised_dataset = featurise_dataset( |
|
split_dataset, |
|
column = "SMILES", |
|
representations = load_representations_from_dicts([{"name": "morgan"}, {"name": "maccs_rdkit"}])) |
|
|
|
model = load_model_from_dict({ |
|
"name": "cat_boost_classifier", |
|
"config": { |
|
"x_features": ['SMILES::morgan', 'SMILES::maccs_rdkit'], |
|
"y_features": ['endpoint']}}) |
|
|
|
model.train(split_featurised_dataset["train"]) |
|
|
|
preds = model.predict(split_featurised_dataset["test"]) |
|
|
|
classification_suite = load_suite("classification") |
|
|
|
scores = classification_suite.compute( |
|
references=split_featurised_dataset["test"]['endpoint'], |
|
predictions=preds["cat_boost_classifier::endpoint"]) |
|
|
|
### Citation |
|
|
|
TY - JOUR |
|
AU - Lou, Chaofeng |
|
AU - Yang, Hongbin |
|
AU - Deng, Hua |
|
AU - Huang, Mengting |
|
AU - Li, Weihua |
|
AU - Liu, Guixia |
|
AU - Lee, Philip W. |
|
AU - Tang, Yun |
|
PY - 2023 |
|
DA - 2023/03/20 |
|
TI - Chemical rules for optimization of chemical mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis and machine learning methods |
|
JO - Journal of Cheminformatics |
|
SP - 35 |
|
VL - 15 |
|
IS - 1 |
|
AB - Chemical mutagenicity is a serious issue that needs to be addressed in early drug discovery. |
|
Over a long period of time, medicinal chemists have manually summarized a series of empirical rules for the optimization of chemical mutagenicity. |
|
However, given the rising amount of data, it is getting more difficult for medicinal chemists to identify more comprehensive chemical rules behind the biochemical data. |
|
Herein, we integrated a large Ames mutagenicity data set with 8576 compounds to derive mutagenicity transformation rules for reversing Ames mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis. |
|
A well-trained consensus model with a reasonable applicability domain was constructed, which showed favorable performance in the external validation set with an accuracy of 0.815. |
|
The model was used to assess the generalizability and validity of these mutagenicity transformation rules. |
|
The results demonstrated that these rules were of great value and could provide inspiration for the structural modifications of compounds with potential mutagenic effects. |
|
We also found that the local chemical environment of the attachment points of rules was critical for successful transformation. |
|
To facilitate the use of these mutagenicity transformation rules, we integrated them into ADMETopt2 (http://lmmd.ecust.edu.cn/admetsar2/admetopt2/), |
|
a free web server for optimization of chemical ADMET properties. The above-mentioned approach would be extended to the optimization of other toxicity endpoints. |
|
SN - 1758-2946 |
|
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-023-00707-x |
|
DO - 10.1186/s13321-023-00707-x |
|
ID - Lou2023 |
|
ER - |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|