dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.518286
c45b26f95afa4cfdbe1fe2305f83eebd
(a) Squeezing of the mechanical quadrature fluctuations ⟨ΔQ̂^2 ⟩ (in decibel) as a function of the sideband parameter κ/ω_m, for different value of the coupling g: g=0.01ω_m (red line), g=0.05ω_m (yellow line), g=0.3ω_m (cyan line). The other values for the parameters are: γ=10^-4ω_m, η=1, n̅=10. Solid lines represent the fluctuations ⟨ΔQ̂^2⟩_ fb of the unconditional state obtained via Markovian feedback through the Hamiltonian ℋ̂_ fb = ξ_mP̂ I_Y. Dashed curves represent the fluctuations ⟨ΔQ̂^2⟩_c of the conditional states [or equivalently of the unconditional state obtained via the optimal feedback Hamiltonian in Eq. (<ref>)]. The shaded area marks the excluded region beyond the threshold value Eq. (<ref>). Dashed black lines are the predictions of the adiabatic theory Eq. (<ref>). (b) Effects of measurement-plus-feedback for an ideal BAE measurement. Black arrows describe how quadratures influence each other. By measuring the output phase quadrature, information is extracted from Q̂ (outgoing arrow), while no information can be extracted from P̂ (incoming arrow) where all the backaction goes. Ideal Markovian feedback drives both Q̂ and Ŷ. (c) Markovian feedback restricted to the mechanical mode (mechanical-limited feedback) and including non-QND terms; these open new paths (dashed arrows) where both backaction and conditioning can spread. The mechanical mode is also subject to (unmonitored) noise from a thermal environment (Q̂_in and P̂_in), which for convenience is not shown
2012.15221
Fig1New.jpg
0.45025
d8f961e832f94066855631267f12d0e2
Top views of the lowest energy structures of C_18 supported on Ir(111). Carbon and iridium atoms are shown in grey and blue colors, respectively. The brightness of the colors follow the coordinate perpendicular to the surface. Side views are further shown for structures 0 and 4.
2012.15222
C18.jpg
0.400806
1a2d5c286279487d964424d8fc013b29
The anatase TiO_2(001)-(1×4) surface reconstruction, featuring rows of protruding titanium atoms. In the structure search context we consider two versions of the problem, having either 2 or 3 atomic layers optimized on top of a fixed bulk layer. One unit cell of the global minimum for these problems, labeled the 2-layer and 3-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) problems respectively, are shown in the figure. For the 2 layer problem 27 atoms are optimized, whereas 39 atoms are optimized in the 3 layer problem.
2012.15222
TiO2_structures.jpg
0.423151
80635f0c3e9c4f9395b9d188148d07ca
One dimensional GPR example, comparing the normal Gaussian kernel (a,b,c) with the double Gaussian kernel (d,e,f) used in GOFEE. The target function are represented by the thick green line, the GPR model by the black line and the training data by red dots. The thin lines represent functions sampled from the model distributions. a and d) Prior to training, both models just predict the mean of the data, however functions sampled for the two kernels are visually dissimilar, with the double Gaussian kernel resulting in short scale wiggles on top of the long scale variations. b) and e) For the trained models, the single Gaussian model tends to overshoot the target, and underestimate short scale uncertainties Even with only a weight of β=0.01, the short scale Gaussian in the double Gaussian model remedies these flaws to a large extent. c) and f) Adding further data, as orange dots, requiring even more short scale variation, only reinforces this point.
2012.15222
covariance.jpg
0.438303
bea3a3afa471403eb5e30c0266bcfc40
Workflow in GOFEE. (i) Random initial structures are generated, evaluated with DFT and added to a structural database. (ii) The surrogate model is trained based on the database (iii) The population is initialized/updated. (iv) A number, N_c, of new candidate structures are generated by applying stochastic changes to the population. (v) All N_c candidates are relaxed in the acquisition function. (vi) The single most promising candidate according to the acquisition function is selected. (vii) A single evaluation, using the target energy expression, is performed for this structure, along with a second evaluation for the structure perturbed slightly along the force. The search is carried out by adding these two newly evaluated structures to the training database and repeating steps (ii)-(vii) N times in total.
2012.15222
flow_diagram.jpg
0.471416
3e00c31d531d46108ee8107d9edb4a23
The population scheme, visualized with principal component analysis (PCA), with the first two principal components capturing 83% of the variance. a) First, all evaluated structures, with an energy above Δ E_pop of the best structure found so far, are ignored, as represented by black circles. b) Secondly, The remaining structures are clustered in the feature space using the k-means++ algorithm. The resulting clusters are colored, and cluster centers drawn as black circles. Thirdly, the population is created by selecting the lowest energy structure in each cluster, drawn as black crosses. c) The population resulting from applying the scheme to this dataset, consisting of the 500 first structures of a GOFEE search. As the population structures can lie on cluster edges, some could in principle be very similar. The diversity of the population is however not found to suffer greatly from this effect, as exemplified in c). The adequacy of the PCA visualization is also visible in the fairly reasonable positions of the cluster centers, and only slight smearing of the cluster borders.
2012.15222
population.jpg
0.418208
e21d115d58394603ba071a2d435fe587
Benchmark of GOFEE, on the 3-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) problem. Blue curve: GOFEE is used as presented in this paper, with dual-point, the double Gaussian kernel, the same κ_relax=κ=2 used for relaxation and candidate selection and with the repulsive prior. Green curve: uses the normal Gaussian covariance. Orange curve: Omitting the repulsive prior mean function.
2012.15222
success_bench_cov_prior.jpg
0.46636
92d702794482413182aca834e8c8e492
Benchmark of GOFEE, on the 3-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) problem. Blue curve: GOFEE as presented in this paper. Red curve: The dual-point evaluation is ommitted in the search.
2012.15222
success_bench_dualpoint.jpg
0.47533
0df8c87fcb7640eca9a1757622cb0376
Benchmark of GOFEE, on the 3-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) problem. Blue curve: GOFEE as presented in this paper. Purple curve: Relaxations are carried out with κ=0 in the acquisition function.
2012.15222
success_bench_kappa_relax.jpg
0.522051
8a831422d1364afda63f124de7a3a584
The geometries of the four lowest energy structures of C_24, along with success curves for finding each structure, based on 50 independent restarts of GOFEE. The colored success curves represent searches run with the new population and improved local convergence schemes, whereas the gray curves represent searches without these additions. Structures 1 and 3 are found in almost 100 of searches after only 1500 DFT evaluations, whereas the global minimum and structure 2 is found in ≈80 of searches after 3000 DFT evaluations. These might be more difficult because they both feature two four membered rings, which are typically not energetically favored compared to hexagonal and pentagonal rings. In comparison, structures 1 and 3 contain only one and none, respectively.
2012.15222
success_c24.jpg
0.414925
c286dc77d18046df8cfec2fc4a44cd5b
Importance of the new candidate structures. a) Success curves for the 2-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) problem, resulting from searches with different numbers, N_c, of new candidates generated in each search iteration. The gain in performance, from e.g. quadrupling N_c, is remarkable, especially in the range of relatively small N_c. b) The full, green line shows the success curve for the 3-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) problem. The dashed, dark blue line shows the fraction of the searches, that, based on the acquisition function, would select the global minimum, were it supplied as one of the new candidates. The remaining dashed lines only counts this artificial selection of the global minimum successful if the predicted uncertainty, σ_sur(x_GM), thereon, is less than the various values given in the figure. This supplies information about how certain the model is about the GM, when it is selected over the other candidates.
2012.15222
success_candidates.jpg
0.481806
4470427c04304cf89b98b2941e204a02
The effect κ on the performance on searches on the 2-layer TiO_2(001)-(1×4) system. a) success curves, each based on 75 independent searches, for different values of κ, with values increasing when going from blue to red. b) Snapshots of the success rates for each curve, in a), N_SP=200, 400 and 800 single-point evaluations into the search.
2012.15222
success_kappa.jpg
0.407602
f2a77693bccf47e79add89ba7d6eccd0
Sketch of the TPR scheme, with N_GED=3 for simplicity. First, the predicted uncertainty of the selected structure is compared to the threshold value σ_TPR, to determine, whether to continue with the TPR scheme. If moving on with the scheme, GED steps are taken, in an attempt to reach the lowest energy structure among the previously evaluated structures within the basin. Each GED step is carried out by moving to the nearest structure, among the N_GED closest, which has a lower energy than the present one. When no lower energy neighbors are found, a TPR trajectory is initialized by carrying out two relaxation steps in the target potential, from the final structure. Alternatively, if the GED steps at some point reaches a structure which is part of an ongoing TPR trajectory, this relaxation is continued.
2012.15222
tpr.jpg
0.420937
7df7a07b8296452dbc6e98559460f661
Transverse profiles for (a) the characteristic speeds and (b) primitive variables of a photospheric waveguide representative of pores and sunspot umbrae. These profiles are generated by specifying the transverse distributions of the adiabatic sound (c_ s) and cusp (c_ T) speeds, for which a continuous transition layer (TL) connects a uniform interior to a uniform exterior (see Equation <ref>). This TL is located between r_ i = R-l/2 and r_ e = R+l/2, where R is the mean waveguide radius and l the TL width. For illustration purposes, here l/R is arbitrarily chosen to be 0.2.
2012.15426
Fig01.jpg
0.473435
a96565711dfd4fffa608e3226a842cea
Dependence on the magnetic Reynolds number (R_ m) of the dispersive properties of slow surface kink modes in a photospheric waveguide. Plotted are (a) the damping-time-to-period ratio τ/P, (b) the axial phase speed /k, and (c) the damping rate in units of k. A number of combinations of the transition layer width (l/R) and axial wavenumber (kR) are examined as labeled. The area shaded yellow corresponds to the range of R_ m that is likely to be relevant for pores and sunspot umbrae. See the text for details.
2012.15426
Fig02.jpg
0.479557
0fb1f973a1fb4353b7a8b65130f6484b
Dependence on the magnetic Reynolds number (R_ m) of the terms involved in the energy balance (see Equation <ref> and the associated definitions). A number of combinations of the transition layer width (l/R) and axial wavenumber (kR) are examined as labeled. The area shaded yellow corresponds to the range of R_ m that is likely to be relevant for pores and sunspot umbrae. The diamonds represent -2, taken from a small subset of the values presented in Figure <ref>c. See the text for details.
2012.15426
Fig03.jpg
0.417767
f8a753fc791b4b07866984546b8c8a5c
Radial distributions of the s̅_ res term for a number of representative values of the magnetic Reynolds number (R_ m) at a given pair of [l/R, kR] = [0.1, 0.7]. Here s̅_ res is evaluated by applying the bar operation (Equation <ref>) to the definition of (Equation <ref>). The shaded area represents where the equilibrium quantities are nonuniform. See the text for details.
2012.15426
Fig04.jpg
0.512124
f733af380efd40bba5b51294dc06ed84
Dispersive properties of resonantly damped slow surface kink modes, shown by the dependence on the dimensionless layer width (l/R) of (a) the damping-time-to-period ratios (τ/P), (b) the axial phase speeds (/k), and (c) the damping rates () in units of k. A number of axial wavenumbers (kR) are examined as represented by the different colors. The results from self-consistent resistive computations are given by the solid curves. For each pair of [l/R, kR], the explicit dispersion relation (Equation <ref>) in the thin-boundary limit is also solved. The dashed curves represent the computations where both the cusp and resonances are accounted for, whereas the dotted curves take into account only the cusp resonance.
2012.15426
Fig05.jpg
0.482347
d3c2d66ad57546108947eb94a1b34b66
Radial distributions of the real part of the Fourier amplitude of the radial flow speed (Reṽ_r) in the intervals embracing (a) the cusp, and (b) the dissipative layers. A number of magnetic Reynolds numbers () are examined as labeled, whereas [l/R, kR] is fixed at [0.2, 2]. The eigenfunctions are rescaled such that = 1 at r = 1.25 R.
2012.15426
Fig06.jpg
0.453691
6a557fe161634ed8a5c1c89804af6cd7
Dependence on the transition layer width (l/R) of the ratios of the hatted terms in Equation (<ref>). The axial wavenumber is fixed at kR = 2. For a given l/R, a number of magnetic Reynolds numbers () are examined to evaluate the hatted terms as represented by the symbols of different colors. With solid curves we connect the symbols representing , , and Ŝ_ ideal for the same but different l/R. The dashed curve represents -2, the values of which are direct outputs of our code. See the text for details.
2012.15426
Fig07.jpg
0.469889
645e6cb561054cc4abc3b6f1f62fc99c
Radial profiles of some relevant eigen-functions found in self-consistent resistive computations for resonantly damped slow surface kink modes. Two different values for the axial wavenumber are examined, one corresponding to kR = 0.3 (the left column) and the other to kR = 2 (right). The vertical dash-dotted lines mark the boundaries of the transition layer, which corresponds to a layer-width-to-radius-ratio of l/R = 0.2. The black (red) curves correspond to the real (imaginary) parts. The top row pertains to the Eulerian perturbation to total pressure (), while the rest correspond to the radial (ṽ_r), azimuthal (ṽ_θ), and axial (ṽ_z) speeds. The eigen-functions are normalized such that =1 where its modulus attains maximum. Different values for the magnetic Reynolds number () are adopted in the two columns, see the text for details.
2012.15426
Fig08.jpg
0.498792
d1fe3a33d3a84de28c09933433bf2ced
Similar to Figure <ref> except that the dependence on the axial wavenumber (kR) is examined. Here the dimensionless transition layer width is fixed at l/R = 0.2.
2012.15426
Fig09.jpg
0.451325
18ccc757aeaa4b4a886611bd0ecec432
Dependence on the axial wavenumber (k) of the optimal damping-time-to-period ratio (τ/P)_min and the transition-layer-width-to-radius ratio (l/R)_min where the optimal damping is reached. The values for (τ/P)_min and (l/R)_min are derived from self-consistent resistive computations. At an (l/R)_min thus derived, the explicit dispersion relation in the TB limit (Equation <ref>) is also solved, yielding (τ/P)^ TB for comparison. See the text for details.
2012.15426
Fig10.jpg
0.499207
2a47459a6c8549d3945628e1a28dc71a
Comparsion of 3-qubit systems using different methods for benchmark case.
2012.15427
1Statetransfer_level8_bench_BF.jpg
0.469321
c57c245f43034a80a7d411788bfe5969
Best fidelity under different time durations.
2012.15427
4Opencontrol_level4_time.jpg
0.456735
a4b13d48fcd8434a90fc7b2982b8d423
Illustration of the curriculum learning process with a flow of tasks.
2012.15427
Fixedtasks.jpg
0.472841
0d7ee0e3910446a6ad8fc4062ac86599
Framework of CDRL approach for quantum control. (a) Curriculum construction and management. The curriculum agent generates a task for training the RL agent and utilizes the performance of the RL agent to determine whether a stop criterion is satisfied. Once the previous task has been achieved, knowledge is transferred between different tasks by reusing past samples. Meanwhile, measures are taken to excite the RL agent before the subsequent task is scheduled. (b) Train the RL agent for one task. At each time step t, the RL agent observes its current state s_t (step 1) and suggests a control action a_t (step 2), which is mapped to the control fields {u_m(t)} (step 3). Then, the quantum system takes the proposed control strategy and obtains the next state s_t, with fidelity F_t and reward signal r_t (step 4). The transition e_t=(s_t,a_t,r_t,s_t+1,F_t) is put into a large memory buffer (step 5). Finally, a batch of transitions is selected from the buffer and then fed into the networks to update its weights or parameters (step 6).
2012.15427
overall_framework.jpg
0.473088
46bc940845004fb9915b8642607ea873
Illustration of transferring knowledge between two tasks.
2012.15427
transferknowledge.jpg
0.435889
9dad86e5c2d94baf855814edf7b3a4fb
The mass difference between extremal hairy dyonic and magnetic black holes for different electric charge q. The upper charge limit q_ max≃72 or 𝒪(2π/e^2) is obtained by requiring an exponentially decreasing behavior for f(r) at large r.
2012.15430
dyonmasscharge.jpg
0.41666
7d94eba8eb2b45f2a5f52ae909756432
The black hole masses as functions of horizon radii for both the hairy and RN magnetic black holes. The left endpoints of the two curves correspond to the extremal black hole cases.
2012.15430
masscomp.jpg
0.398719
f92ddcc673af41d69bd49f713cf7faf5
RF-Visual Grasping. Using the RFID's location, crops out the RGB-D data near the tagged object location, and feeds the cropped RGB-D data and RFID location probability as input to the Deep-NN that outputs the Q-value estimations. The rotated inputs in 16 different directions are separately fed to DNN to estimate Q-values of different grasping rotations.
2012.15436
Net_new.jpg
0.437978
56e1509ea0fc4f25a68a64a3e58992ca
System Overview. uses RGB-D (green arrows) to create a 3D model of the environment and extract occluded regions, and it plugs the location of the RFID-tagged object (red arrows) into it. If the object is behind obstacles, it performs RF-guided active exploration and trajectory optimization to obtain a better view of the object by maneuvering around obstacles. Once a stopping criterion is met, it proceeds to grasping. Here, it applies RF-based attention to the RGB-D information and relies on a model-free deep-reinforcement network to discover optimal grasping affordances. uses the RFID's locationto close the loop on the grasping task and determine whether it has been successful or whether it needs to make another grasping attempt.
2012.15436
overview_final.jpg
0.40593
c9ccf4865fb445afb28ca2af088dcce6
RFID-based Perception. uses a customized reader that can identify and accurately localize RFID-tagged objects through occlusions.
2012.15436
rfid.jpg
0.483923
5699a4fd44834a26a506d0e3fc8736d2
Citrus tree
2012.15438
CITRUS-macrobench.jpg
0.458307
bcb5e16272aa444ea51840fd55885383
Skip list
2012.15438
SKIPLISTLOCK-macrobench.jpg
0.511715
5bff950db36b4a72b07489317a280e71
An example of using bundled references in a linked list. The path made of solid lines represents the state of the linked list after all update operations take place. Edges are labeled with their respective timestamps.
2012.15438
bundle-example.jpg
0.471631
cc0cdc716000463eb5a70a5a448db44e
CT, 0-90-10
2012.15438
citrus0.jpg
0.47854
4fab5590478648bc9b6ee3ea76e1780c
CT, 10-80-10
2012.15438
citrus10.jpg
0.474962
363d6f3e6bc7476b8bd224082d5ef1a9
CT, 2-88-10
2012.15438
citrus2.jpg
0.468797
cd6d63a9efd547ab9b7446a3b2b9bb22
CT, 50-40-10
2012.15438
citrus50.jpg
0.461442
5e342d88f060459aade9c34296009943
CT, 90-0-10
2012.15438
citrus90.jpg
0.449809
b283f99c07fb4e36a067fd39206b995d
SL, 0-90-10
2012.15438
skiplistlock0.jpg
0.441825
0139cb4f016e45ea937985567bc92e10
SL, 10-80-10
2012.15438
skiplistlock10.jpg
0.495103
ef95fd0b7e874dae95e1cc59a3a1b3be
SL, 2-88-10
2012.15438
skiplistlock2.jpg
0.473667
865c339dfc024145929edb5990becdac
SL, 50-40-10
2012.15438
skiplistlock50.jpg
0.465196
4effc561436c4cf5979bd470a5e59c07
SL, 90-0-10
2012.15438
skiplistlock90.jpg
0.397622
e899aee5e5a24be5af99d7a91bd61d62
Framework of SID method based on CenterNet <cit.>.
2012.15439
CenterNet.jpg
0.415487
670f35f57c0b4184a1cfbbb9c50bd489
Framework of SID method based on FCOS <cit.>.
2012.15439
FCOS.jpg
0.436289
c2723601ca83459787e6b2da06a5cf1a
An example of incremental object detection. The challenge is to retrain the model to maintain the detection of the old classes whilst learning the new classes. During each incremental step, only new class data and annotations for new class objects are provided.
2012.15439
incremental_learning.jpg
0.47899
4213f8d461674d7bb2c4a50cde444db9
The top graph shows the prediction accuracy of training and test sets for 400 epochs, whereas the bottom graph indicates the loss for DeepTake on prediction of three classes of low-, mid-, and high- takeover time.
2012.15441
AccuracyVSLoss.jpg
0.394044
73e2c4258f8345b9bb7eb8fde0d24a42
The left figure shows the accuracy result of training and test sets for 400 epochs whereas the right figure indicates the loss for our DNN model on prediction of three class driver's reaction time.
2012.15441
Accuracy_vs_Loss.jpg
0.363041
f7dda7fead3c430e8a0f48b77cacd22e
Confusion matrix for the prediction of takeover behavior.The results are averaged over 10 fold cross validation splits. (a) Binary class takeover intention takeover(TK) vs. Not Takeover(NTK), (b) 3-Class classification results of takeover time, (c) 3-class classification of takeover quality.
2012.15441
CM_ALL.jpg
0.387405
aa8dc664bfc2438db51612e6d782f4d5
Confusion matrix for the prediction of five classes of driver takeover time.
2012.15441
CM_FiveCL_RT.jpg
0.487049
85bc5820a5344810938ba01939cd1562
Confusion matrix for the prediction of three classes of driver's takeover time.
2012.15441
CM_ThreeCL_RT.jpg
0.421308
a567aec1f3334658b66861f77c9be2e6
DeepTake uses data from multiple sources (pre-driving survey, vehicle data, non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) information, and driver biometrics) and feeds the preprocessed extracted features into deep neural network models for the prediction of takeover intention, time and quality.
2012.15441
DeepTake-overview-cropped.jpg
0.416828
8b122d7f33e74ad580d69afb360186b4
DeepTake uses data from multiple sources (pre-driving survey, vehicle data, non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) information, and driver biometrics) and feeds the preprocessed extracted features into deep neural network models for the prediction of takeover intention, time and quality.
2012.15441
DeepTake-overview-revised.jpg
0.417187
f17e2cfb129342a78803fb9fe0a7e37e
A schematic view of an example of a takeover situation used in our study, consisting of: 1) takeover timeline associated with participants’ course of action; 2) system status; and 3) takeover situation. The vehicle was driven in the automated mode to the point after the TOR initiation and transitioning preparation period. The ego vehicle is shown in red and the lead car is white. When the Ego vehicle reaches its limits, the system may initiate (true alarm) or fail (no alarm) to initiate the TOR, and the driver takes the control back from the automated system.
2012.15441
Fig2-scenario.jpg
0.44671
3bc4e089d380491ea37df59f61df33a5
The ROC curve comparison of our DeepTake and six ML classification algorithms for classification of takeover behavior: (a) takeover intention, (b) takeover time, and (c) takeover quality. The ROC curve shows the average performance of each classifier and the shadowed areas represent the 95% confidence interval. The macro AUC associated with each classifier is shown where AUC value of 0.5 refers to a chance.[Best viewed in color]
2012.15441
ROC_ALL_test_4.jpg
0.48949
2bba2febd1324a8d8e4b2769354e344a
User study setup. This custom driving simulator consists of a 30-inch monitor, a Logitech G29 steering wheel, and 10.5-inch Apple iPad Air on which the non-driving tasks are displayed. For switching between the automated and manual control of the vehicle, the participant needs to press the two blue buttons on the steering wheel simultaneously. The participant wears a pair of eye-tracking glasses, and a wearable device with GSR and PPG sensors for the biometrics acquisition.
2012.15441
Study_Setup.jpg
0.424615
0d0e758f7ac9452a90beef644e6fb04d
Average trajectories when drivers took over control from automated system after receiving TORs. Top graph shows the lateral position of the vehicle with respect to no alarm (silent failure) and true alarm (explicit alarm). Bottom graph shows the lateral position of the vehicle for three categories of takeover time (low, mid, and high). The light shaded area representing standard deviation at each time point.
2012.15441
Trajectory4final_2.jpg
0.440981
ec1107ba53d4465380fb0a54a0de3952
Serial pipeline that consists of two commands f_1, f_2
2012.15443
pipeline1.jpg
0.408712
91fe704a00c4466792c3377bbb2445db
Unoptimized parallel pipeline that executes a combiner after each parallel command
2012.15443
pipeline2.jpg
0.453544
b8b0a99cd7f948e79010a9a3b5d7997d
Optimized parallel pipeline that executes multiple commands in parallel after eliminating intermediate combiners
2012.15443
pipeline3.jpg
0.488562
c11b40c7b2444aed861f2f9abcada49f
system workflow includes splitting an original serial pipeline into commands, synthesizing combiners for each of these commands, and reassembling the commands and synthesized combiners into a new parallel pipeline.
2012.15443
system.jpg
0.457188
c718bcf3e038497e9292770c8ccf5d18
Instantaneous flow
2012.15444
20_inst_meandering.jpg
0.409624
8a827ba911ec48969f7ea970acdde54b
isolines Reynolds stresses at X/L=2.0 in yz-plane. (a): ⟨ u'u' ⟩; (b): ⟨ v'v' ⟩; (c): ⟨ w'w' ⟩; (d): ⟨ u'v' ⟩; (e): ⟨ v'w' ⟩; (f): ⟨ u'w' ⟩.
2012.15444
20_stresses_xbyL2.jpg
0.496151
5da9909e49824a4995bd98c42239f532
Meandering of the L-vortex using reconstructed flow fields. Black and red circles indicate the beginning and the end of the meandering trajectory.
2012.15444
L_vort_recon2.jpg
0.465785
fc3ebf960b0a485c9f172512a537788f
Meandering of R-vortex using reconstructed flow fields.
2012.15444
R_vort_recon2.jpg
0.397275
77b39009236f47c3a1ec070a96c07a19
Top: R-vortex from the simulation. Bottom: Theoretical Model (Batchelor vortex). U, V, W velocity components are shown from left to right. Note the R-vortex in simulation is centered to (0,0) to compare with the fitted Batchelor vortex.
2012.15444
Simulation_Batchelor_xbyL2.jpg
0.486819
70d79d3644bc425ab83af737c162f557
2012.15444
U_azimuthal_avg_xbyL2.jpg
0.450154
cdc9829eefec430a87b32099cc8b344c
Computational domain and grid employed for current afterbody simulations. Grids on the center xy-plane of the base, and at downstream farfield location are shown to illustrate the grid topology. Cylindrical grid with origin at the center of the base and periodicity in the azimuthal direction is used. Domain extends 12D and 14D in downstream (green) and radial farfield (red) directions respectively. Bottom half of the computational domain is not shown.
2012.15444
cutcyl20_mesh_annotated.jpg
0.435333
4b34078f452b4e5d9fc2b039004d38a3
2012.15444
energy_modes_compare.jpg
0.461473
5dad552ab467449bbbbcf85ff1625a4c
2012.15444
losses_compare.jpg
0.437809
ca0697eb56cf4ee49700fab9daf3e048
Canonical configuration employed to reproduce the streamwise-oriented wake vortex pair. Cylinder diameter is D and upsweep angle is ϕ=20. The coordinate axis origin is located at the center of the upswept surface, (0,0,0), (red cross: ×) and the axial slant length is L = D cot(ϕ). The shaded colored region encompasses the near-computational domain. The upstream apex (UA) and the downstream apex (DA) are located at x/D=-cot(ϕ)/2,y/D=-0.5,z/D=0 and x/D=cot(ϕ)/2,y/D=0.5,z/D=0 respectively. To describe the flow around the upswept base, the transformation X=x+D/2cot(ϕ) is used such that UA and DA are at X/L=0 and X/L=1 respectively. At the inlet, simulated boundary layer data matching the experiments <cit.> are used.
2012.15444
meadering_sketch.jpg
0.5181
c589403e300d484e9b8b8cd210206805
Phase-portrait of instantaneous vortices at X/L=2.0. The location of the mean vortex is shown as the large filled square. Black and red circles respectively indicate the beginning and end of the trajectory.
2012.15444
meandering1.jpg
0.4754
b88831eb034c4685ada94e091157d763
2012.15444
meanflow_xbyL2.jpg
0.487323
a7b59fbae04b49f29f7d70631f129d9c
q̃_1,2(x,t)
2012.15444
recon12.jpg
0.450929
d58567e3a9c8419390e6cdeb4a6c3f3d
q̃_2,2(x,t)
2012.15444
recon2.jpg
0.4734
09db486a991a45e69ab0e59d4cfdd9cb
Isolated vortex (72× 72, c=0.975).
2012.15444
tangrid_1vort_cp975.jpg
0.517354
a0f430ec337b42dfbe0bc6dde8928fc8
Vortex pair (100× 100, c=0.75).
2012.15444
tangrid_2vort_cp9.jpg
0.410595
3e14fc4b02c5458f917e77321a50ee6b
Unstable mode at k=2.
2012.15444
temporal_mode1_k2.jpg
0.504353
fa33dbf8e45e4f1fbc7a8a5bc82779b7
2012.15444
u_vortex.jpg
0.395789
fb7ae45373b34799ba94912984aad18c
Isolated vortex.
2012.15444
vort1_temporal1_tanh_k2.jpg
0.410221
68e0d220422a4a23996da624581baa2e
Spatial (ω=2).
2012.15444
vort2_spatial_om2.jpg
0.520403
4235cf14d90846708634b8485ceba71d
Vortex pair (u=0).
2012.15444
vort2_temporal_U0_k2.jpg
0.477505
91ac5e4504614c39970eb61fc29635e8
Temporal (k=2).
2012.15444
vort2_temporal_convergence_tanh_k2.jpg
0.410508
89572872a38c4255a04b4280b019e6a8
Pair of counter-rotating vortices at a streamwise location. δ-radius and |Γ|-circulation of vortex. b-separation between vortices.
2012.15444
vortices_sketch3.jpg
0.40521
a9325bc082174b7db7157fa243157e35
The general pipeline of the decomposition methods. These methods distribute the prediction score to input space to indicate the input importance. The target score is decomposed layer by layer in a back-propagation manner. Note that the main difference among these methods is the employed score decomposition rule.
2012.15445
decomposition.jpg
0.548579
2a6b52a80dc64633ae80dfa64690b156
A overview of our open-source library, which includes unified implementations of multiple common baseline methods, commonly used datasets, and three evaluation metrics.
2012.15445
dig_subx2.jpg
0.432074
9f29e3cbc1054557b63139fd773e7250
A data example of our graph sentiment datasets. Each node represents a word while edges indicates the relationship between the words. Note that edges are directed but their labels are ignored.
2012.15445
graph_sentence_structure.jpg
0.432003
9b73e2f7d71c4357b73b45ea78f258a1
The general pipeline of the perturbation-based methods. They employ different mask generation algorithms to obtain different types of masks. Note that the mask can correspond to nodes, edges, or node features. In this example, we show a soft mask for node features, a discrete mask for edges, and an approximated discrete mask for nodes. Then the mask is combined with the input graph to capture important input information. Finally, the trained GNNs evaluate whether the new prediction is similar to the original prediction and can provide guidance for improving the mask generation algorithms.
2012.15445
perturbation.jpg
0.464147
cbd60ff0a0844ae0adfe9a1e20da5000
The general pipeline of the surrogate methods. Given an input graph and its prediction, they first sample a local dataset to represent the relationships around the target data. Then different surrogate methods are applied to fit the local dataset. Note that surrogate models are generally simple and interpretable ML models. Finally, the explanations from the surrogate model can be regarded as the explanations of the original prediction.
2012.15445
surrogate2.jpg
0.538887
36b805664c8f4a8ea35ad4bfb8ce8dc4
An overview of our proposed taxonomy. We categorize existing GNN explanation approaches into two branches: instance-level methods and model-level methods. For the instance-level methods, the gradients/features-based methods include SA <cit.>, Guided BP <cit.>, CAM <cit.>, and Grad-CAM <cit.>; the perturbation-based methods are GNNExplainer <cit.>, PGExplainer <cit.>, ZORRO <cit.>, GraphMask <cit.>, Causal Screening <cit.>, and SubgraphX <cit.>; the decomposition methods contains LRP <cit.>, Excitation BP <cit.> and GNN-LRP <cit.>; the surrogate methods include GraphLime <cit.>, RelEx <cit.>, and PGM-Explainer <cit.>. For the model-level methods, the only existing approach is XGNN <cit.>.
2012.15445
taxonomy.jpg
0.474726
bfdcb8343252483f8367e181d15cc63d
(a) Energy levels of ^85Rb relevant to our experiment. δ_780nm and δ_515nm are the detunings of the two pump lasers from transitions 1 and 2, respectively. Numeric labels have been assigned to each transition for readers' convenience. (b) Schematics of the experimental setup. The two pump laser beams are denoted by the red and green lines, and selected optical elements are shown along beam paths. The vacuum vapor cell is sketched as a square with 4 labelled windows, while the THz beam is denoted by grey dotted line and the UV beam by purple dotted line. Details on beam paths and optical components along them are given in the text.
2012.15449
Fig1.jpg
0.443468
ba16360696ce40d38495526fb92d84f1
Knife-edge measurements of the generated THz beam at 3 cm from the exiting Si window. The solid line is a fit to the data (black squares) with the error function, which is the integration of a Gaussian beam profile along the radial direction. The knife edge is placed after the Si window but before any other optics.
2012.15449
Fig2.jpg
0.455834
5c5eedd249a24aa6b5cbdd0e0a42d3f3
Generated THz and UV powers plotted versus the two detunings δ_780nm and δ_515nm for two different beam configurations. The power of the 515 nm pump is ∼15 mW for both configurations; while the power of the 780 nm laser is ∼120 mW for the collimated configuration, but ∼160 mW for the focused configuration. The plotted THz powers are calibrated to be that just before the Si window inside the chamber by taking into account the efficiencies of various THz components listed in Table <ref>. The two spectra in each row share the same false-color bar right to them.
2012.15449
Fig3.jpg
0.451517
786ebc8779aa4fc78df74367b9706385
Generated powers of 3.3 THz (open symbol) and 7.8 THz (filled symbol) as a function of the 780 nm pump power for the 515 nm laser powers of 10 mW (green triangle), 12 mW (red circle), and 15 mW (black square). The input pump beams are in the collimated configuration. The detunings of both pump lasers are kept at the values that produce maximum THz power. The solid lines are a guide for the eye.
2012.15449
Fig4.jpg
0.534821
242e917ac72d4a559d348afa2448afc1
Comparison between an attractive Coulomb potential (solid), and the two model nuclear potentials, Eq. (<ref>) (short dashed) and Eq. (<ref>) (dashed).
2012.15451
PotentialFig.jpg
0.498873
6fafb4d08f6d47ff87d9ea9c63fc61ea
The energy per particle ϵ for 5 alike spin particles on a ring of varying radii with an interaction potential Z/|r_ij| for Z∈{-1,0,+1}. The two model nuclear interactions in Eqs. (<ref>) and (<ref>) are depicted with triangles, right and inverted respectively. Each set of points is given alongside its corresponding HF analytic expression from Eqs. (<ref>), (<ref>), and (<ref>). The corresponding Seitz radii r_s are given in the top axis.
2012.15451
ZConstantNExtendedFig.jpg
0.398116
b80382a6dd3c411785f084f1f3d66b72
QMC (symbols) and HF (lines) energy per particle ϵ for n alike spin particles on a r_s=1 ring with an interaction potential Z/r for Z∈{-1,0,+1}.
2012.15451
ZConstantRhoFig.jpg