Datasets:

PleIAs

/

WTO-Text

like 5

Follow

PleIAs 173

WTO_1/273495_2021_SPS_SAU_21_3137_00_x.pdf

273495_2021_SPS_SAU_21_3137_00_x

الضوابط والاشتراطات الواجب إتباعها عند استيراد العسل ومنتجات النحل إلى المملكة العربية السعودية  مقدمة بناءً على شروط ومتطلبات استيراد الغذاء من الدول الراغبة بالتصدير إلى المملكة والإجراءات المنظمة لها والمبنى على المادة السابعة من نظام الغذاء في المملكة التي تنص على أنه "لا يجوز فسح الغذاء المستورد إلا بعد موافقة الهيئة وفقاً للشروط والمتطلبات والإجراءات التي تحددها اللائحة، وتصدر الهيئة اللوائح المنظمة لإجراءات الإذن بفس ح الغذاء المستورد إلى المملكة"، توضح هذه الضوابط والاشتراطات الواجب إتباعها عند استيراد العسل ومنتجات النحل إلى المملكة العربية السعودية  النطاق العسل المنتج من النحل ومنتجات النحل، ويغطي كافة اشكال العسل ومنتجات النحل المخصصة للاستهلاك البشري . الضوابط والاشتراطات أولاً : شروط ومتطلبات إستيراد الغذاء إلى المملكة العربية السعودية: الإطار التنظيمي لشروط ومتطلبات إستيراد الغذاء من الدول الراغبة بالتصدير إلى المملكة والإجراءات المنظمة لها بناء على المادة السابعة من نظام الغذاء في المملكة التي تنص على أنه "لا يجوز فسح الغذاء المستورد إلا بعد موافقة الهيئة وفقاً للشروط والمتطلبات والإجراءات التي تحددها اللائحة، وتصدر الهيئة اللوائح المنظمة لإجراءات الإذن بفسح الغذاء المستورد إلى المملكة"، وكذلك على الفقرة الرابعة من المادة الثالثة من اللائحة التنفيذية لنظام الغذاء التي تنص على أن "تلتزم الدول التي يتم الإستيراد منها بالشروط والمتطلبات التي تصدرها الهيئة، والمنشورة على موقع الهيئة الالكتروني (باللغة العربية هنا) و (باللغة الإنجليزية هنا) أو على الرابط التالي: 10/ff27102020aa1a.pdf- https://www.sfda.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2020 e.pdf1aa 27102020ff/10- 2020 https://www.sfda.gov.sa/sites/default/files/ ثانياً: الشهادة الصحية يجب ان تصاحب ارساليات العسل ومنتجات النحل شهادة صحية وفق النموذج المعتمد لدى الهيئة العامة للغذاء والدواء المنشور (هنا) أو على الرابط التالي: 10/ff27102020aa1a.pdf- https://www.sfda.gov.sa/sites/default/files/2020 رابعاًالمتطلبات العامة لاستيراد العسل ومنتجات النحل: 1. يحظر استيراد العسل ومنتجات النحل من المناطقأو الدول الموبوءة والمنصوص عليها من قبل المنظمة العالمية للصحة الحيوانية (OIE) أو منظمة الصحة العالميةWHO) او أي منظمات أخرى. او التي صدر فيها قرار حظر او تعليق من الهيئة العامة للغذاء والدواء 2. يسمح فقطباستيراد العسل ومنتجات النحل من الدول والمنشآت المعتمدة لدى الهيئة العامة للغذاء والدواء. والمنشورة على موقع الهيئة الالكتروني ضمن قائمة الدول المصدرة للعسل الى للمملكة العربية السعودية (هنا)، أو على الرابط التالي: https://www.sfda.gov.sa/ar/list_countries 3. أن يكون المستورد قام بتسجيلالمواد ولمنتجات التي يرغب في استيرادها في نظام (FIRS) عبر (هنا) أو عبر الرابط: https://frcs.sfda.gov.sa/Login.aspx 4. وجود مستودع مرخص وفقا لاشتراطات الهيئة (يستثنى من ذلك المصانع المحلية المستوردة للمواد الخام وتدخل في عملية تصنيع منتجاتها ، بالإضافة إلى المستوردين الذين لا تتجاوز عدد إرسالياتهم في السنة الميلادية عن (5) إرساليات ومجموع أوزانها لا يزيد عن (2000كجم، على أن يقوم المستورد بتوقيع نموذج التعهد الخاص ب ذلك و إرسالها للهيئة عبر البريد الإلكتروني LMRD.FOOD@SFDA.GOV.SA . 5. أ تتجاوز أحجام العبوات العسل ومنتجات النحل المعدة للاستهلاك الآدمي على 2 كيلوجرام، ويستثنى من ذلك المنتجات لغرض التصنيع وإعادة التعبئة في المصانع المحلية. 6. لايسمح بإعادةتصدير العسل ومنتجات النحل إلى المملكة للأحجام التي تتجاوز 2 كيلوجرام، على أن يكون مصدر العسل من منشآت دول معتمدة لدى الهيئة العامة للغذاء والدواء، ومطابق للضوابط والاشتراطات المذكورة في هذه الوثيقة. المستندات الإلزامية العامة لفسح العسل ومنتجاته والتي يجب أن تقدم الى الهيئة في منفذ الدخول: م المستند (ورقية/إلكترونية) ملاحظات 1 صورةالبيان الجمركي (Bill Of Entry.) التقديم عبر منصة فسح عبر الرابطهنا) 2 صورة شهادة المنشأOrigin Certificate) مستند يصدر من بلد الشحن أو التصنيع 3 صورة الفاتورة التجاريةcommercial invoice) مستند من الشركة المصدرة 4 صورة بيان التعبئة/ قائمة بمحتويات الارسالية (Packing List) مستند من الشركة المصدرة 5 صورة بوليصة الشحنbill of lading) مستند من الشركة الناقلة 6 أصل شهادة صحيةHealth Certificate.) مرفقه فيشروط ومتطلبات استيراد الغذاء إلى المملكة 7 نسخةشهادة صلاحية التصدير للمواد والمنتجات الغذائية الخليجية المنتجات ذات المنشأ الخليجي 8 شهادة المطابقة اختيارية لجميع الدول إلزامية لبعض الدول (حسب الرابط هنا) ملاحظات عامة: 1. أنيكون الغذاء المستورد مستوفي لمتطلبات الأنظمة والتعليمات واللوائح الفنية المعتمدة لدى الهيئة. 2. الالتزام بالتعاميم الصادرة من الهيئة والمنشورة على الموقع الالكتروني 3. أن يتم الالتزام بدليل الاشتراطات العامة لنقل المواد الغذائية للمملكةهنا ) 4. توفر مؤشر قراءة درجات الحرارة أثناء النقل (دليل نقل الأغذية المبردة والمجمدة). 5. أصل شهادة حلالHalal Certificate): للمنتجات الغذائية المحتوية على مكون ذو أصل حيواني، لأي مواد غذائية تحمل بطاقة البيان او البطاقة التعريفية كلمة او شعار "حلال "من تلك المواد التي لا تتطلب شهادة حلال. 6. يجب تقديم شهادة تثبت صحة أي شعار يوضع على بطاقة المنتج الغذائية وذلك بناء على ما نصت عليه اللائحة الفنية السعودية الخليجية رقم SFDA FD. GSO 9 "بطاقات المواد الغذائية المعبأة"، في البند رقم3.4 عند استخدام أي شعار خاص بالحلال أو علامات الجودة أو منتج عضوي... الخ يجب تقديم ما يثبت صحة هذا الادعاء. 7. استناداً لنظام الغذاء ولائحته التنفيذية الصادرة بقرار مجلس إدارة الهيئة العامة للغذاء والدواء رقم03-16-٩) وتاريخ ٩/4/٩هـ.، واستنادا على ما نصت عليه اللائحة في المادة السابعة والعشرون "للهيئة حق سحب عينات من الغذاء دون مقابل؛ للتحقق من مدى مطابقتها لأحكام هذا النظام ولوائحه، وتحليلها إذا لزم الأمر في مختبراتها، أو في المختبرات المسجلة لديها"، والمادة الثالثة والاربعون " للهيئة الاستعانة بأي جهة حكومية أخرى أو بالقطاع الخاص؛ للقيام بأي مهمة مسندة إليها بموجب هذا النظام ولائحته"، وللتحقق من استيفاء الغذاء لمتطلبات الهيئة، قد يتم سحب عينات من الإرسالية المستوردة واحالتها إلى المختبرات الخاصة المعينة من قبل الهيئة بموجب لائحة تعيين جهات تقويم المطابقة والمختبرات الخاصة، لغرض تحليلها والتأكد من مطابقتها لاشتراطات الهيئة. على ان يتحمل المستورد تكاليف تحليل وفحص العينات. اللوائح الفنية والمواصفات القياسية: *تحدث هذه اللوائح بشكل مستمر ويجب الاطلاع على التحديثات قبل استيراد المواد الغذائية. المواصفات العامة والتي تطبق في مرحلة الفسح: المواصفات العامة رقم المواصفة اسم المواصفة باللغة العربية SFDA.FD/GSO 9 بطاقات المواد الغذائية المعبأة SFDA.FD 150 -1 فترات صلاحية المنتجات الغذائية- الجزء الأول : فترات الصلاحية الإلزامية SFDA.FD 2500 المواد المضافة المسموح باستخدامها في المواد الغذائية SFDA.FD 2233 اشتراطات البيانات التغذوية على البطاقة SFDA.FD 2333 اشتراطات الأغذية ذات الإدعاءات التغذوية والصحية SFDA.FD/GSO 1016 المعايير الميكروبيولوجية للسلعوالمواد الغذائية SFDA.FD 382 الحدود القصوى لبقايا مبيدات الآفات في المنتجات الزراعية والغذائيـة SFDA.FD/GSO 2055 -1 الأغذية الحلال الجزء الأول: الاشتراطات العامة للأغذية الحلال SFDA.FD 2481 الحدود القصوى المسموح بها من بقايا الادوية البيطرية في الأغذية SFDA.FD/GSO 2359 مذيبات الاستخلاص والحدود القصوى المسموح بها المستخدمة في انتاج المواد الغذائية ومكوناتها SFDA.FD 193 الملوثات والسموم في الأغذية والأعلاف SFDA.FD/GSO 1366 اشتراطات عامة لتداول الأغذية المستعملة لأغراض طبية خاصة SFDA.FD 839 عبوات المواد الغذائية الجزء الأول : اشتراطات عامة SFDA.FD 1863 عبوات المواد الغذائية – الجزء الثاني: العبوات البلاستيكية – اشتراطات عامة. SFDA.FD 21 الشروط الصحية في مصانع الأغذية والعاملين بها. SFDA. FD/ GSO 1694 القواعد العامة لصحة الغذاء. العسل ومنتجات النحل العسل o SFDA.FD 147 "عسل النحل"  يتطلب شهادة صحية حبوب اللقاح ، غذاء الملكات، صمغ النحل (العكبر)، شمع العسل o SFDA.FD/GSO 122 "طرق اختبار عسل النحل" o SFDA.FD/GSO 2290 "عسل النحل المستخدم في التصنيع "عسل الخباز" o SFDA.FD/GSO 2097 "غذاء ملكات النحل"  شهادة جودة في حال وجد شعار جودة على بطاقة المنتج.  شهادة انتاجعضوي للمنتجات العضوية  شهادة تثبت مطابقة العسل المنتج في نيوزيلاندا للحدود المسموح بها لمادة التوتين المراجع التكميلية: المراجع 1. نظام الغذاء 2. قائمة الدول 3. قرارات الحظر ورفع الحظر 4. قائمةمكاتب التحقق والمطابقة والمختبرات الخاصة المعينة من قبل الهيئة 5. مركز حلال 6. شروطومتطلبات استيراد الغذاء إلى المملكة 7. دليل نقل الأغذية المبردة والمجمدة 8. تعميم الهيئة بشأن الاحتفاظ بالمستندات ٩. آلية انتاج واستيراد الأغذية الجاهزة المعدة للإستهلاك 10. دليل تسجيل الأغذية الخاصة ومشروبات الطاقة 11. المتجر الالكتروني للوائح الفنية والمواصفات القياسية السعودية/الخليجية 12. نظام التصنيف الالكتروني)PCS(

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_TZA361.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_TZA361

G/TBT/N/TZA/361 18 de diciembre de 2019 (19-8816) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica: TANZANÍA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable: Tanzania Bureau of Standards (Oficina de Normas de Tanzanía) Morogoro/Sam Nujoma Road, Ubungo P.O. Box 9524 Teléfono: +255 222450206 Correo electrónico: nep@tbs.go.tz Sitio web: www.tbs.go.tz Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad diferente: 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de: 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda; en otro caso partida del arancel na cional. Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): Tejidos textiles (ICS: 59.080.30). 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado: Proyecto de Norma DEAS 1016:2019, Textiles - Maasai Shuka – Specifications (Textiles. "Shuka" masái. Especificaciones). Documento en inglés (5 páginas). 6. Descripción del contenido: En el Proyecto de Norma de África Oriental notificado se establecen los requisitos y los métodos de muestreo y de prueba aplicables a los "shuka" masái. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes: inform ación al consumidor y etiquetado; protección de la salud o seguridad humanas; requisitos de calidad. 8. Documentos pertinentes: Norma ISO 1833 (todas las partes), Textiles. Análisis químico cuantitativo. Norma ISO 6330, Textiles. Procedimientos de lavado y de secado domésticos para los ensayos de textiles. Norma ISO 3801, Textiles. Tejidos. Determinación de la masa por unidad de longitud y por unidad de superficie. Norma ISO 105 -B01, Textiles. Ensayos de solidez del color. Parte B 01: Solidez del color a la luz: Luz del día. G/TBT/N/TZA/361 - 2 - Norma ISO 105 -C10, Textiles. Ensayos de solidez del color. Parte C10: Solidez del color al lavado con jabón o con jabón y sosa. Norma ISO 105 -D01, Solidez del color a la limpieza en seco con percloroetileno com o disolvente. Norma ISO 105 -E04, Textiles. Ensayos de solidez del color. Parte E04: Solidez del color a la transpiración. Norma ISO 105 -X11, Solidez del color al planchado en caliente. Norma ISO 105 -X12, Textiles. Ensayos de solidez del color. Parte X12: Solidez del color al frote. Norma ISO 12945 -2, Textiles. Determinación de la tendencia a la formación de pelusilla y de bolitas. Parte 2: Método Martindale modificado. Norma ISO 13934 -1, Textiles. Propiedades de los tejidos frente a la tracción. Parte 1: Determinación de la fuerza máxima y del alargamiento a la fuerza máxima por el método de la tira. Norma ISO 13936 -1, Textiles. Determinación de la resistencia al deslizamiento de los hilos de la costura en los tejidos de calada. Parte 1: Método de la abert ura de la costura fija. Norma ISO 13937 -2, Textiles. Propiedades de los tejidos frente al desgarro. Parte 2: Determinación de la fuerza de desgarro de probetas con forma de pantalón (Método de desgarro único ). Norma ISO 14362 -1, Textiles. Métodos para la determinación de ciertas aminas aromáticas derivadas de colorantes azoicos. Parte 1: Detección del uso de ciertos colorantes azoicos accesibles sin extracción. Norma ISO 14362 -3, Textiles. Métodos para la determinación de ciertas aminas aromáticas derivada s de colorantes azoicos. Parte 3: Detección del uso de ciertos colorantes azoicos , que pueden liberar 4 -aminoazobenceno. Norma ISO 16373 -2, Textiles. Colorantes. Parte 2: Método general para la determinación de los colorantes extractables, incluyendo las s ustancias alergénicas y cancerígenas (método empleando piridina -agua). Norma ISO 16373 -3, Textiles. Colorantes. Parte 3: Método para la determinación de ciertos colorantes cancerígenos extraíbles (método con trimetilamina/metanol). Norma ISO 22198, Textile s. Tejidos. Determinación de la anchura y de la longitud. ISO 24153, Random sampling and randomization procedures . 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción: abril de 2020 Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor: fecha de adopción como norma obligatoria por el Ministerio de Industria, Comercio e Inversión 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones: 60 días después de la fecha de notificación 11. Textos disponibles en: Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso, de otra institución: Tanzania Bureau of Standards (Oficina de Normas de Tanzanía) Morogoro/Sam Nujoma Road, Ubungo P.O. Box 9524 Teléfono: +255 222450206 Correo electrónico: nep@tbs.go.tz Sitio web: www.tbs.go.tz https://members.wt o.org/crnattachments/2019/TBT/TZA/19_7298_00_e.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBTN21_BLZ14.pdf

q_G_TBTN21_BLZ14

G/TBT/N/BLZ/14 24 March 2021 (21-2425) Page: 1/2 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Original: English NOTIFICATION The following notification is being circulated in accordance with Article 10.6 1. Notifying Member: BELIZE If applicable, name of local government involved (Article 3.2 and 7.2): 2. Agency responsible: Belize Bureau of Standards Name and address (including telephone and fax numbers , email and website addresses, if available) of agency or authority designated to handle comments regarding the notification shall be indicated if different from above: Power Lane P.O. Box 430 City of Belmopan, Cayo District Belize, C.A. Telephone: +1 (501) 822 -0446; Fax: +1 (501) 822 -2571 Email: tbtenquiry -belize@bbs.gov.bz or bbs@btl.net 3. Notified under Article 2.9.2 [ ], 2.10.1 [X], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], other : 4. Products covered (HS or CCCN where applicable, otherwise national tariff heading. ICS numbers may be provided in addition, where applicable): Prohibited products – applies t o single use plastic products only, with the intention to transition these to environmentally friendly alternatives (i.e. biodegradable and compostable products); HS Code 3923.90.90.00 for styrofoam clamshells, styrofoam food containers, styrofoam soup con tainers, styrofoam plates, styrofoam cups and lids; HS Code 3923.21.00.00 and 3923.29.00.00 for plastic carrier bags commonly referred to as shopping bags and/or T - shirt bags; HS Code 3924.10.10.00 for plastic and styrofoam single -use disposable food conta iners, cutlery and eating utensils; plastic forks, knives, spoons, sporks etc.; plastic plates; plastic bowls; plastic cups and plastic tumblers; HS Code 3924.10.20.00 for single -use disposable drinking straws. 5. Title, number of pages and language(s) of the notified document: Final Draft Belize Standard Specification for Biodegradable Products – Specification and Labelling (13 page(s), in English) 6. Description of content: This standard was developed to address specification and labelling of biodegrada ble products imported, distributed, manufactured or sold in Belize. It is intended to be established as a mandatory standard to support the enforcement of the Regulation primarily through the implementation of recognized independent third - party certificati ons and test results. This standard specifies minimum requirements, test methods and labelling of commercially biodegradable, commercially compostable, anaerobically biodegradable or environmentally biodegradable (soil, water, landfill, etc.) plastics manu factured in or imported into Belize. 7. Objective and rationale, including the nature of urgent problems where applicable: Protection of the environment G/TBT/N/BLZ/14 - 2 - 8. Relevant documents: https://bbs.gov.bz/wp -content/uploads/2021/03/FDBZS -32-2021_Biodegradable - Products -Specification -Labelling.pdf 9. Proposed date of adoption: 03 May 2021 Proposed date of entry into force: 01 June 2021 10. Final date for comments: - 11. Texts available from: National enquiry point [ ] or address, telephone and fax numbers and email and website addresses, if available , of other body: Belize Bureau of Standards Power Lane P.O. Box 430 City of Belmopan , Cayo District Belize, C.A. Telephone: +1 (501) 822 -0446; Fax: +1 (501) 822 -2571 Email: tbtenquiry -belize@bbs.gov.bz or bbs@btl.net https://bbs.gov.bz/standards -for-comments/ https://doe.gov.bz/single -use-plastics/

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/282331_2022_SPS_EU_22_1691_00_s.pdf

282331_2022_SPS_EU_22_1691_00_s

REGLAMENTO DE EJECUCIÓN (UE) 2022/202 DE LA COMISIÓN de 14 de febrero de 2022 que corrige el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470, por el que se establece la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE) LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea, Visto el Reglamento (UE) 2015/2283 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 25 de noviembre de 2015, relativo a los nuevos alimentos, por el que se modifica el Reglamento (UE) n.o 1169/2011 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo y se derogan el Reglamento (CE) n.o 258/97 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo y el Reglamento (CE) n.o 1852/2001 de la Comisión (1), y en particular su artículo 8, Previa consulta al Comité Permanente de Vegetales, Animales, Alimentos y Piensos, Considerando lo siguiente: (1) Con arreglo al artículo 8 del Reglamento (UE) 2015/2283, la Comisión debía establecer, a más tardar el 1 de enero de 2018, la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos autorizados o notificados de conformidad con el Reglamento (CE) n.o 258/97 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo (2). (2) La lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos autorizados o notificados con arreglo al Reglamento (CE) n.o 258/97 se estableció mediante el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470 de la Comisión (3). (3) La Comisión ha detectado errores en el anexo del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470. Son necesarias correcciones para aportar claridad y seguridad jurídica a los explotadores de empresas alimentarias y a las autoridades competentes de los Estados miembros, garantizando así la aplicación y el uso adecuados de la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos. (4) El nuevo alimento «hierba Cistus incanus L. Pandalis» fue autorizado por la autoridad competente de Chequia, sujeto a determinadas condiciones de uso, conforme a lo establecido en el artículo 5 del Reglamento (CE) n.o 258/97. En las especificaciones de este nuevo alimento se omitió erróneamente que el nuevo alimento consiste en las partes aéreas (brotes jóvenes con partes leñosas) secadas y cortadas de Cistus incanus L. Pandalis. Por otra parte, en esas especificaciones se añadió por error información detallada sobre la composición del nuevo alimento que el solicitante había presentado como información complementaria, pero que no se incluyó en el dictamen emitido por la autoridad checa competente ni es necesaria para la evaluación de la seguridad ni para la caracterización del producto. Conviene suprimir esta información. Por tanto, las especificaciones relativas a «hierba Cistus incanus L. Pandalis» del cuadro 2 del anexo del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470 deben corregirse en consecuencia. (1)DO L 327 de 11.12.2015, p. 1. (2)Reglamento (CE) n.o 258/97 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 27 de enero de 1997, sobre nuevos alimentos y nuevos ingredientes alimentarios (DO L 43 de 14.2.1997, p. 1). (3)Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470 de la Comisión, de 20 de diciembre de 2017, por el que se establece la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos, de conformidad con el Reglamento (UE) 2015/2283 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, relativo a los nuevos alimentos (DO L 351 de 30.12.2017, p. 72).ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 15.2.2022 L 33/41 (5) Mediante el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2021/1318 de la Comisión (4)se corrigió la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos autorizados para incluir el nuevo alimento «L-metilfolato cálcico» que, aunque fue autorizado en enero de 2008 por la autoridad competente irlandesa en determinadas condiciones de uso de conformidad con el Reglamento (CE) n.o 258/97, incorrectamente no se había incluido en la lista de la Unión cuando se elaboró la lista inicial. En las condiciones de uso del «L-metilfolato cálcico» en los complementos alimenticios, tal como se definen en la Directiva 2002/46/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo (5), que se indicaron en la lista de la Unión se excluía por error a los lactantes y niños de corta edad de los usuarios destinatarios, a pesar de que la autorización original autorizaba ese uso. Por tanto, es necesario corregir la entrada relativa a «L-metilfolato cálcico» del cuadro 1 del anexo del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470. (6) Los límites de especificación relativos al mercurio (≤ 1,0 mg/kg) y el platino (≤ 2 mg/kg) establecidos para el «L-metilfolato cálcico» en el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2021/1318 se refieren a los límites de las especificaciones de este nuevo alimento autorizado como fuente de folato en los preparados para lactantes, preparados de continuación, alimentos elaborados a base de cereales y alimentos infantiles por el Reglamento Delegado (UE) 2021/571 de la Comisión ( 6). Sin embargo, los límites de especificación de ≤ 1,5 mg/kg para el mercurio y ≤ 10 mg/kg para el platino también fueron autorizados originalmente por la autoridad competente irlandesa en 2008, sobre la base de un dictamen favorable de la Autoridad Europea de Seguridad Alimentaria sobre la seguridad del nuevo alimento (7). Es necesario corregir en consecuencia el cuadro 2 del anexo del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470. (7) El Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470, que contiene la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos, debe corregirse en consecuencia. HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Artículo 1 El anexo del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470 se corrige de conformidad con el anexo del presente Reglamento. Artículo 2 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor a los veinte días de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. Hecho en Bruselas, el 14 de febrero de 2022. Por la Comisión La Presidenta Ursula VON DER LEYEN (4)Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2021/1318 de la Comisión, de 9 de agosto de 2021, que corrige el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470, por el que se establece la lista de la Unión de nuevos alimentos, la Decisión 2008/968/CE, relativa a la autorización de comercialización de aceite rico en ácido araquidónico procedente de la Mortierella alpina como nuevo ingrediente alimentario, y el Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2020/484, por el que se autoriza la comercialización de la lacto-N-tetraosa como nuevo alimento (DO L 286 de 10.8.2021, p. 5). (5)Directiva 2002/46/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 10 de junio de 2002, relativa a la aproximación de las legislaciones de los Estados miembros en materia de complementos alimenticios (DO L 183 de 12.7.2002, p. 51). (6)Reglamento Delegado (UE) 2021/571 de la Comisión, de 20 de enero de 2021, que modifica el anexo del Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, en lo que respecta a la lista de sustancias que pueden añadirse a los preparados para lactantes, los preparados de continuación, los alimentos infantiles y los alimentos elaborados a base de cereales (DO L 120 de 8.4.2021, p. 1). (7)The EFSA Journal (2004) 135, 1-20.ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 33/42 15.2.2022 ANEXO El anexo del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2017/2470 se corrige como sigue: 1)La entrada relativa a «L-metilfolato cálcico» se sustituye por el texto siguiente: a)en el cuadro 1 (Nuevos alimentos autorizados): Nuevo alimento autorizado Condiciones en las que puede utilizarse el nuevo alimento Requisitos específicos de etiquetado adicionales Otros requisitos «L-metilfolato cálcicoCategoría específica de alimentosContenido máximo (expresado en ácido fólico) La denominación del nuevo alimento en el etiquetado de los productos alimenticios que lo contengan será “L-metilfolato cálcico”.»Alimentos para usos médicos especiales y sustitutivos de la dieta completa para el control de peso, tal como se definen en el Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013De conformidad con el Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013 Preparados para lactantes y preparados de continuación, tal como se definen en el Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013De conformidad con el Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013 Alimentos elaborados a base de cereales y alimentos infantiles para lactantes y niños de corta edad, tal como se definen en el Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013De conformidad con el Reglamento (UE) n.o 609/2013 Complementos alimenticios, tal como se definen en la Directiva 2002/46/CEDe conformidad con la Directiva 2002/46/CE Alimentos enriquecidos, de conformidad con el Reglamento (CE) n.o 1925/2006De conformidad con el Reglamento (CE) n.o 1925/2006 y b)en el cuadro 2 (Especificaciones): Nuevos alimentos autorizados Especificaciones «L-metilfolato cálcicoDescripción: El nuevo alimento se produce mediante síntesis química a partir del ácido fólico. Es un polvo cristalino casi inodoro, de color blanco a amarillento claro, poco soluble en agua y muy poco soluble o insoluble en la mayoría de los disolventes orgánicos. Definición: Fórmula química: C 20H23CaN 7O6ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 15.2.2022 L 33/43 Denominación sistemática: Ácido N-{4- [[[(6S)-2-amino-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahidro-5-metil-4-oxo-6-pteridinil]metil]amino] benzoil}-L-glutámico, sal de calcio. Números CAS: 129025-21-4 (Sal de calcio con una proporción no especificada de L-5-MTHF/Ca2+) y 151533-22-1 (Sal de calcio con una proporción 1:1 especificada de L-5-MTHF/Ca2+). Peso molecular: 497,5 daltonsSinónimos: L-metilfolato cálcico; Ácido L-5-metiltetrahidrofólico, sal de calcio [(L-5-MTHF-Ca)]; Ácido (6S)- 5-metiltetrahidrofólico, sal de calcio [(6S)-5-MTHF-Ca]; Ácido (6S)-5-metil-5,6,7,8-tetrahidropteroil-L-glutámico, sal de calcio y ácido L-5-metil-tetrahidrofólico (L-5-MTHF) sin el catión especificado. Fórmula estructural: Características Pureza: > 95 % (base seca) Agua: ≤ 17,0 % Calcio (en sustancia anhidra y libre de disolventes): 7,0-8,5 % D-metilfolato cálcico (isómero 6R, αS): ≤ 1,0 % Otros folatos y sustancias afines: ≤ 2,5 % Etanol: ≤ 0,5 % Contaminantes Lactantes o niños de corta edad Población general, excluidos los lactantes y niños de corta edad Plomo: ≤ 1 mg/kg Plomo: ≤ 1 mg/kg Boro: ≤ 10 mg/kg Boro: ≤ 10 mg/kg Cadmio: ≤ 0,5 mg/kg Cadmio: ≤ 0,5 mg/kg Mercurio: ≤ 1,0 mg/kg Mercurio: ≤ 1,5 mg/kgES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 33/44 15.2.2022 Arsénico: ≤ 1,5 mg/kg Arsénico: ≤ 1,5 mg/kg Platino: ≤ 2 mg/kg Platino: ≤ 10 mg/kg Criterios microbiológicos: Recuentos totales de aerobios viables: ≤ 1 000 UFC/g Recuento total de levaduras y mohos: ≤ 100 UFC/g UFC: unidades formadoras de colonias». 2)En el cuadro 2 (Especificaciones), la entrada relativa a «Hierba Cistus incanus L. Pandalis» se sustituye por el texto siguiente: Nuevos alimentos autorizados Especificaciones «Hierba Cistus incanus L. PandalisDescripción: Hierba Cistus incanus L. Pandalis; especie de la familia Cistaceae, autóctona de la región mediterránea, en la península de Calcídica. El nuevo alimento consiste en las partes aéreas (brotes jóvenes con partes leñosas) secadas y cortadas de Cistus incanus L. Pandalis.»ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 15.2.2022 L 33/45

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBTN19_SAU1105A3.pdf

q_G_TBTN19_SAU1105A3

G/TBT/N/SAU/1105/Add.3 5 December 2019 (19-8364) Page: 1/1 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Original: English NOTIFICATION Addendum The following communication, dated 4 December 2019, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia . _______________ Technical Regulation for Traffic light labelling In 5 March 2019, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia notified WTO (TBT) about this Technical Regulation (G/TBT/N/SAU/1105). Due to the valuable comments from many WTO Members, this Technical Regulation will be reviewed by Saudi Arabia, and it will be a voluntary approach currently, an d shall not come into force until further notice. https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/TBT/SAU/19_6920_00_x.pdf __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_SG_N8IDN27S1.pdf

q_G_SG_N8IDN27S1

G/SG/N/8/IDN/27/Suppl.1 G/SG/N/10/IDN/27/Suppl.1 G/SG/N/11/IDN/24 17 February 2021 (21-1366) Page: 1/3 Committee on Safeguards Original: English NOTIFICATION UNDER ARTICLE 12.1(B) OF THE AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS ON FINDING A SERIOUS INJURY OR THREAT THEREOF CAUSED BY INCREASED IMPORTS NOTIFICATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 12.1(C) OF THE AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS NOTIFICATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 9, FOOTNOTE 2 OF THE AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS INDONESIA Carpets and Other Textile Floor Coverings The following communication, dated 1 5 February 2021, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Indonesia. _______________ Pursuant to Articles 12.1(c) of the WTO Agreement on Safeguards, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia hereby notifies the issuance of Minister of Finance 's Regulation Number 10/PMK.010/2021 dated 2 February 2021 , promulgated in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 88-2021 on 3 February 2021 regarding the imposition of a safeguard measure on the importation of carpets and other textile floor coverings, for a period of 3 period started on 17 February 2021. Minister of Finance 's Regulation Number 10/PMK.010/2021 can be found in the website of the Indonesian Safeguard Committee: kppi.kemendag.go.id . 1 GENERAL BACKGROUND On 24 September 2020, the Republic of Indonesia notified the findings of safeguard investigation in which it was concluded that there was an evidence that the increased of volume of imports have caused a threat of serious injury to the domestic industry concerne d in this investigation (G/SG/N/8/IDN/27 - G/SG/N/10/IDN/27). It was also indicated in the notification that the Investigating Authority was proposing to the Government of the Republic of Indonesia the imposition of a safeguard measure on the importation of the subject goods. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT GOODS The description of the subject goods are as follows: Carpets and other textile floor coverings, under Harmonized System (HS.) code 57. G/SG/N/8/IDN/27/Suppl.1 • G/SG/N/10/IDN/27/Suppl.1 • G/SG/N/11/IDN/24 - 2 - 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MEASURE The Government of the Republic Of Indonesia has decided to impose the following safeguard duty: TIMETABLE OF THE SAFEGUARD DUTY Period Safeguard Duty First year (17 February 2021 – 16 February 2022) Rp. 85,679/meter2 Second year (17 February 2022 – 16 February 2023) Rp. 81,763/meter2 Third year (17 February 2023 – 16 February 2024) Rp. 78,027/meter2 Below is the list major exporting members of imports of the product involved and the list of developing countries excluded from the said safeguard measure, and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia reserves the right to modify this list in light of c hanging import volumes exceeded 3%. LIST OF MAJOR EXPORTING MEMBERS OF IMPORTS OF THE PRODUCT INVOLVED Country 2019 Volume ( meter2) % People 's Republic of China 13,795,446 63.43 Turkey 4,167,254 19.16 Repub lic of Korea 952,704 4.38 Japan 807,595 3.71 Other Countries 2,025,204 9.32 Source: Statistics Indonesia/ Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), processed . LIST OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES EXCLUDED FROM THE MEASURES No. Countries No. Countries 1 Afghanistan 63 Madagascar 2 Albania 64 Malawi 3 Angola 65 Malaysia 4 Antigua and Barbuda 66 Maldives 5 Argentina 67 Mali 6 Armenia 68 Mauritania 7 Bahrain, Kingdom of 69 Mauritius 8 Bangladesh 70 Mexico 9 Barbados 71 Moldova, Republic of 10 Belize 72 Mongolia 11 Benin 73 Montenegro 12 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 74 Morocco 13 Botswana 75 Mozambique 14 Brazil 76 Myanmar 15 Brunei Darussalam 77 Namibia 16 Burkina Faso 78 Nepal 17 Burundi 79 Nicaragua 18 Cabo Verde 80 Niger 19 Cambodia 81 Nigeria 20 Cameroon 82 Oman 21 Central African Republic 83 Pakistan 22 Chad 84 Panama 23 Chile 85 Papua New Guinea 24 Colombia 86 Paraguay 25 Congo 87 Peru 26 Costa Rica 88 Philippines 27 Côte d'Ivoire 89 Qatar 28 Cuba 90 Russian Federation 29 Democratic Republic of the Congo 91 Rwanda 30 Djibouti 92 Saint Kitts and Nevis 31 Dominica 93 Saint Lucia 32 Dominican Republic 94 Saint Vincent & the Grenadines 33 Ecuador 95 Samoa 34 Egypt 96 Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of 35 El Salvador 97 Senegal G/SG/N/8/IDN/27/Suppl.1 • G/SG/N/10/IDN/27/Suppl.1 • G/SG/N/11/IDN/24 - 3 - No. Countries No. Countries 36 Eswatini 98 Seychelles 37 Fiji 99 Sierra Leone 38 Gabon 100 Singapore 39 Gambia 101 Solomon Islands 40 Georgia 102 South Africa 41 Ghana 103 Sri Lanka 42 Grenada 104 Suriname 43 Guatemala 105 Chinese Taipei 44 Guinea 106 Tajikistan 45 Guinea -Bissau 107 Tanzania 46 Guyana 108 Thailand 47 Haiti 109 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) 48 Honduras 110 Togo 49 Hong Kong, China 111 Tonga 50 India 112 Trinidad and Tobago 51 Israel 113 Tunisia 52 Jamaica 114 Uganda 53 Jordan 115 Ukraine 54 Kazakstan 116 United Arab Emirates 55 Kenya 117 Uruguay 56 Kuwait, the State of 118 Vanuatu 57 Kyrgyz Republic 119 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 58 Lao People 's Democratic Republic 120 Vietnam 59 Lesotho 121 Yemen 60 Liberia 122 Zambia 61 Liechtenstein 123 Zimbabwe 62 Macao, China It is requested that this no tification under Article 12.1 (c) of the WTO Agreement on Safeguards be brought to the notice of Members. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBTN23_RWA910.pdf

q_G_TBTN23_RWA910

G/TBT/N/RWA/910 7 August 2023 (23-5365) Page: 1/2 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Original: English NOTIFICATION The following notification is being circulated in accordance with Article 10.6 1. Notifying Member: RWANDA If applicable, name of local government involved (Article 3.2 and 7.2): 2. Agency responsible: Rwanda Standards Board (RSB) KK 15 Rd, 49 P.O.BOX 7099, Kigali, Rwanda Tel: +250 788303492 Email: info@rsb.gov.rw Website: www.rsb.gov.rw Name and address (including telephone and fax numbers , email and website addresses, if available) of agency or authority designated to handle comments regarding the notification shall be indicated if different from above: 3. Notified under Article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], 3.2 [ ], 7.2 [ ], other : 4. Products covered (HS or CCCN where applicable, otherwise national tariff heading. ICS numbers may be provided in addition, where applicable): (HS code(s): 3923) 5. Title, number of pages and language(s) of the notified document: DRS 565 -1: 2023, Packaging of pesticides — Requirements — Part 1: Solid pesticides; (15 page(s), in English) 6. Description of content: This Draft Rwanda Standard gives the requirements for packaging of solid pesticides. It does not cover the packaging requ irements for solid pesticides meant for household use (DRS 565 -3) and fumigants (DRS 565 -4). 7. Objective and rationale, including the nature of urgent problems where applicable: Consumer information, labelling; Prevention of deceptive practices and consumer protection; Protection of human health or safety; Protection of animal or plant life or health; Protection of the environment; Quality requirements; Reducing trade barriers and facilitating trade; Cost saving and productivity enhancement 8. Relev ant documents: 1. RS 406, Pesticides –— Terminology 2. RS EAS 865, Corrugated fibre board boxes for general packaging — Specification 9. Proposed date of adoption: To be determined Proposed date of entry into force: To be determined G/TBT/N/RWA/910 - 2 - 10. Final date for comments: 60 days from notification 11. Texts available from: National enquiry point [ ] or address, telephone and fax numbers and email and website addresses, if available , of other body: Rwanda Standards Board (RSB) KK 15 Rd, 49 Toll Free: 3250 Tel: +250 788303492 Email: info@rsb.gov.rw Website: www.rsb.gov.rw P.O.BOX 7099, Kigali, Rwanda https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/TBT/RWA/23_11545_00_e.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_AG_NMAC46.pdf

r_G_AG_NMAC46

G/AG/N/MAC/46 7 juillet 2020 (20-4656) Page: 1/1 Comité de l'agriculture Original: anglais NOTIFICATION La communication ci -après, datée du 6 juillet 2020, est distribuée à la demande de la délégation de Macao, Chine . La notification concerne les engagements en matière de subventions à l'exportation (tableau ES:1 ) pour l'année civile 2019. _______________ Conformément à l'article 10 et à l'article 18:2 de l'Accord sur l'agriculture , le gouvernement de la Région administrative spéciale de Macao informe le Comité de l'agriculture que, pendant l'année civile 2019, Macao, Chine n 'a pas accordé de subventions à l'exportation au sens de l'article 9:1 de l'Accord sur l'agriculture. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN19_BRA894.pdf

r_G_TBTN19_BRA894

G/TBT/N/BRA/894 9 août 2019 (19-5205) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : BRÉSIL Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable: National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology - INMETRO (Institut national de métrologie, de qualité et de technologie) Téléphone : +(55) 21 2563.2918 Fax: +(55) 21 2563.5637 Courrier électronique: barreirastecnicas@inmetro.gov.br Site Web: www.inmetro.gov.br/barreirastecnicas Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des observations concernant la notification doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: National Ins titute of Metrology, Quality and Technology - INMETRO (Institut national de métrologie, de qualité et de technologie) 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, sinon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : SH 9028.30 Compteurs d'électricité 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du tex te notifié : Ordonnance ( Ordinance ) 330, 1 1 juillet 2 019 (1 page en portugais). 6. Teneur : Règlement technique établissant des prescriptions métrologiques et de sécurité destinées à améliorer le Règlement technique métrologique approuvé établi en vertu de l'Ordonnance n° 371 de l'INMETRO du 2 8 septembre 2 007 fixant les conditions minimum applicables à l'évaluation de modèle des systèmes de mesure de l'électricité distribuée. 7. Objectif et raison d'être, y compris la nature des problèmes urgents, le cas échéant : Protection de l'environnement ; protection de la santé des personnes et information du consommateur ; Information du consommateur, étiquetage ; protection de la santé ou de la sécurité des personnes ; protection de l'environnement 8. Documents pertinents: 1) Journal officiel brésilien ( Diário Oficial da União ) 150, 5 août 2019, section 1, page 18 ; 2) Ordonnance 371, 2 8 septembre 2 007 ( Portaria Inmetro 371, de 28 de Setembro de 2007 ); 3) Journal officiel brésilien ( Diário Oficial da Uni ão); 4) Non indiqué. G/TBT/N/BRA/894 - 2 - 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : sans objet Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : sans objet 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : sans objet 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les textes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [X] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: http://www.inmetro.gov.br/legislacao/rtac/pdf/RTAC002589.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_KOR838.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_KOR838

G/TBT/N/KOR/838 20 de junio de 2019 (19-4200) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica : REPÚBLICA DE COREA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable : Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (Ministerio de Inocuidad de Alimentos y Medicamentos) Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad diferente: Los documentos están disponibles en el sitio web del Minister io de Inocuidad de Alimentos y Medicamentos (MFDS) ( www.mfds.go.kr ). También se pueden solicitar a: International Cooperation Office (Oficina de Cooperación Internacional), Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (Ministerio de Inocuidad de Alimentos y Medicamentos) 187 Osongsaengmyeong2 -ro, Osong -eup, Heungdeok -gu, Cheongju -si, Chungcheongbuk -do, 28159 República de Corea Teléfono : (+82) 43 719 -1564; fax: (+82) 43 -719-1550 Correo electrónico: wtokfda@korea.kr 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de: 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda ; en otro caso partid a del arancel nacional . Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : Productos parafarmacéuticos. 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado : Proposed amendments to the "Regulation of Labels of Quasi -Drugs" (Propuesta de modificación del Reglamento de Etiquetado de Productos Parafarmacéuticos) . Documento en coreano (13 páginas). 6. Descripción del contenido : El Ministerio de Inocuidad de Alimentos y Medicamentos de la República de Corea ha modificado el Reglamento de Etiquetado de Productos Parafarmacéuticos como se indica a continuación: En adelante, se deberá indicar el contenido en flúor de los productos par afarmacéuticos para administración por vía oral que lo contienen. Se deberá indicar en la etiqueta el contenido en cafeína de las bebidas energéticas . Si las compresas higiénicas utilizan fragancias que contienen materias primas que el Ministerio de Inocu idad de Alimentos y Medicamentos considera y anuncia como alérgenos, el nombre de estas materias primas se indicará en la etiqueta. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes : dar a los consumidores la información a la que tienen derecho y la posibilidad de elegir ; promover el uso adecuado de los productos parafarmacéuticos. G/TBT/N/KOR/838 - 2 - 8. Documentos pertinentes: • Notificación N° 2019 -286 del Ministerio de Inocuidad de Alimentos y Medicamentos (10 de junio de 2019 ) 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción : No se ha determinado. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : No se ha determinado. 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : 60 días después de la fecha de notificación 11. Textos disponibles en : Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso, de otra institución: Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Division (División de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio) Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS) (Agencia de Tecnología y Normas de Corea) 93, Isu -ro, Maengdong -myeon, Eumseong -gun, Chungcheongbuk -do, 27737 República de Corea Teléfono : (+82) 43 870 5525 ; fax: (+82) 43 870 5682 Correo electrónico: tbt@kats.go.kr Sitio web: http://www.knowtbt.kr https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/TBT/ KOR/19_3541_00_x.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_WT_MIN22_ST90.pdf

r_WT_MIN22_ST90

WT/MIN(2 2)/ST/90 12 juin 2022 (22-4528) Page: 1/3 Conférence ministérielle Douzième session Genève, 12 -15 juin 2022 Original: français DECLARATION DE S.E. MME ASSOME AMINATA DIATTA MINISTRE DU COMMERCE ET DES PETITES ET MOYENNES ENTREPRISES SENEGAL Je voudrais vous exprimer, au nom de Son Excellence Monsieur Macky SALL, Président de la République du Sénégal et de l 'ensemble du Gouvernement sénégalais, notre profonde gratitude pour la bonne organisation de la présente session de la Conférence ministérielle de l 'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce (OMC). Je souhaite également féliciter particulièrement la Directrice gén érale, Docteur Ngozi OKONJO -IWEALA et son équipe, pour les efforts considérables déployés en vue de progresser dans les négociations et aboutir à des résultats. Après les résultats encourageants obtenus à Nairobi en décembre 2015 et à Buenos aires en décembre 2017, le moment est venu de poursuivre et consolider les fruits de notre engagement à l'édification d 'un système commercial multilatéral de plus en plus performant au profit de tous. Le Commerce multilatéral doit, plus que jamais, jouer un rôle primo rdial dans la réduction des inégalités entre les membres, contribuer à une croissance soutenue et à l 'atteinte des objectifs de développement durables tels que stipulés dans l 'Agenda 2030 de l 'Organisation des Nations Unies. Il convient de rappeler que la présente Conférence ministérielle se tient dans un contexte mondial marqué par une reprise économique post -COVID -19 inégale et fragile en plus de la situation géopolitique tendue en Europe de l 'Est, autant de facteurs qui ont des répercussions importantes sur le commerce mondial, le système commercial multilatéral et les populations vulnérables du monde entier. C'est dans cette situation difficile que l 'élaboration de réponses efficaces de notre Organisation à la pandémie de COVID -19, d 'une part, et, d 'autre part, à la crise alimentaire, est une urgence et doit faire partie intégrante des premiers résultats de la CM12. Sur ce, ma délégation se réjouit des progrès récemment enregistrés sur les négociations concernant la dérogation à certaines dispositions d e l'Accord sur les ADPIC et appelle à éviter de diluer la substance du texte initial de compromis résultant de ces pourparlers. La réussite de cette CM12 dépend fortement de notre capacité à réformer et à corriger les déséquilibres hérités du cycle de négociations de l 'Uruguay round dans le domaine de l 'agriculture où les subventions agricoles continuent de créer des distorsions sur les marchés internationaux mais aussi d 'intensifier la pauvreté dans les villes et campagnes des pays en développement et surtout ceux les moins avancés. A ce propos, ma délégation est d 'avis que les modalités révisées de 2008 sur l 'agriculture axées, entre autres, sur une réduction considérable du soutien interne ayant des effets de distorsion des échanges, constituent une bonne base pour poursuivre le processus de réforme en vue d 'établir un système équitable de commerce des produits agricoles tout en préservant les flexibilités nécessaires aux pays en développement et aux PMA. WT/MIN(2 2)/ST/90 - 2 - Ma délégation reste également convaincue qu 'une solution définitive sur la détention de stocks publics à des fins de sécurité alimentaire est nécessaire de même qu 'un mécanisme de sauvegarde spécial souple et efficace en faveur des pays en développement et des PMA. En outre, je reste persuadée qu 'une décision ministérielle interdisant les restrictions à l 'exportation sur les denrées alimentaires achetées à des fins humanitaires et non commerciales par le Programme Alimentaire Mondial(PAM) pourrait constituer une contribution significative à la lutte contre l'insécurité alimentaire qui menace de plus en plus les Etats les plus vulnérables. Par ailleurs, le Sénégal est en faveur d 'une pleine mise en œuvre des Décisions ministérielles précédentes de l 'OMC prises en faveur des PMA. Mon pays plaide également pour la prise en compte des défis liés à la conformité aux normes sanitaires et phytosanitaires ainsi que l 'assistance technique et le renforcement des capacités liés au commerce nécessaires à la capitalisation des opportunités offertes au niveau multilatéral pour l'intégration des PMA dans le commerce mondial des marchandises et des services. En plus de la poursuite du processus de réforme de l 'agriculture, le Sénégal est favorable à une réforme de l 'OMC qui doit adhérer aux principes de transpa rence, de justice et d 'équité dans l'équilibre des droits et obligations de ses Membres tout en garantissant que les intérêts des pays en développement et des PMA soient pris en compte. Ma délégation estime que le Système commercial multilatéral doit cont inuer à placer le développement en son centre et permettre aux pays en développement et surtout ceux les moins avancés de renforcer leur intégration dans les chaines de valeurs mondiales. L'industrialisation, la diversification et la transformation struct urelle de nos économies constituent à cet égard un chemin incontournable vers cet objectif. J 'invite donc les membres de l 'OMC à accorder toute la considération et l 'engagement politique nécessaires aux propositions du G 90 sur le traitement spécial et dif férencié. En ce qui concerne les subventions à la pêche, ma délégation continue de soutenir un résultat multilatéral ambitieux et équilibré, qui contribuera à l 'exploitation durable des ressources marines et à leur préservation pour les générations future s. Pour autant, le résultat attendu devra intégrer les flexibilités nécessaires en faveur des pays en développement et des PMA faisant face à des contraintes dans leurs systèmes de gestion de la pêche. En ce qui concerne le reclassement des pays de la lis te des PMA, je tiens à rappeler et surtout à m'en réjouir que, depuis décembre 2021, le Sénégal fait partie des cinq (05) pays dont le reclassement est envisagé par le Comité des Politiques de Développement des Nations Unies. Cela s'explique par les progrè s importants accomplis par mon pays dans la réalisation de ses objectifs de développement dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre du Plan Sénégal Emergent (PSE), entre autres. A cet égard, j 'invite les Membres de l 'OMC ainsi que les partenaires de développement à mettre en œuvre les Résolutions des Nations Unies sur la stratégie de transition sans heurt pour les pays retirés de la liste des PMA, notamment la nécessité de ménager une période de transition uniforme et longue pour aider ces pays retirés de cette li ste à s 'adapter au système commercial multilatéral après leur reclassement. A ce propos, l 'adoption du projet de Décision proposé par les PMA sera un résultat fort appréciable de la CM12. Ma délégation est d 'avis que les initiatives plurilatérales de développement conjointes sont importantes et constituent des leviers de développement économiqu e et social. Cependant, elles ne doivent ni occulter les préoccupations majeures des pays en développement et des PMA sur les questions restantes du Programme de Doha pour le Développement, ni être menées en ignorant les différences de niveau de préparati on et de développement des membres de l 'OMC. En effet, l 'une des forces de notre Organisation est de pouvoir avancer à un rythme harmonieux en prenant en compte les différences, les besoins et les aspirations de ses Membres. WT/MIN(2 2)/ST/90 - 3 - C'est le lieu de saluer encore le travail accompli dans l 'accompagnement des PMA à travers le programme cadre intégré renforcé qui a permis aux PMA éligibles de mieux intégrer le Commerce dans leurs stratégies nationales de développement, ce qui a permis de renforcer leurs capacités de production et d 'exportation dans les secteurs identifiés comme porteurs. A cet égard, j 'exhorte les partenaires bilatéraux et multilatéraux à soutenir davantage ce mécanisme. Je voudrais conclure, en réaffirmant l 'attachement du Sénégal au Système comme rcial multilatéral, ainsi que l 'importance de consolider les fondements de notre Organisation tels que stipulés dans la déclaration de Marrakech et d 'autres documents de l 'OMC. Afin de maintenir cette dynamique et de s 'ouvrir sur de nouvelles perspectives , j'exprime le vœu que les décisions que nous prendrons ici puissent refléter les principes de transparence, d 'équité et d'inclusivité. Ce sont là, les gages de la réussite de la CM12. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_L_1127.pdf

q_WT_L_1127

WT/L/1127 24 November 2021 (21-8863) Page: 1/3 INTRODUCTION OF HARMONIZED SYSTEM 2017 CHANGES INTO WTO SCHEDULES OF CONCESSIONS WAIVER DECISION Adopted on 23 November 2021 The General Council, Having regard to Articles IV:2 and IX:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (the "WTO Agreement"); Recognizing that the adoption of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (hereinafter referred to as the "Harmonized Syste m") has, in addition to facilitating international trade and the analysis of trade statistics, ensured greater uniformity in countries' customs classification, thus enabling them to monitor and protect the value of tariff concessions; Noting that, in accor dance with Article 16 of the Harmonized System Convention, the Council of the World Customs Organization adopted a Recommendation on 27 June 2014 concerning amendments to the Harmonized System which will come into force on 1 January 2017, and that a second Recommendation was adopted on 11 June 2015, which includes corrections and complementary amendments to Chapter 44 (both amendments are collectively hereinafter referred to as "HS2017 changes"); Considering that the General Council by its decision of 7 Dec ember 20161, 1 December 20172, 13 December 20183, 10 December 20 194, and 18 December 20205, acting pursuant to the provisions of Articles IV:2 and IX:3 of the WTO Agreement, suspended the application of the provisions of Article II of GATT 1994 for certain Members, from the date of implementation of HS2017 changes for those Members until 31 Decem ber 2021, to the extent necessary to implement domestically the HS2017 changes pending incorporation of such changes into their Schedules of Concessions, subject to certain conditions; Noting the procedure adopted by the General Council to introduce HS2017 changes, to Schedules of Concessions6, which in certain cases may require negotiations and/or consultations under Article XXVIII of GATT 1994; Considering that the Members listed in the Annex7 to this decision concerned would need more t ime to proceed with consultations or possible Article XXVIII negotiations; 1 WT/L/999, WT/L/999/Add.1, WT/L/999/Add.2, WT/L/999/Add.3, WT/L/999/Add.4, WT/L/999/Add.5, WT/L/999/Add.6, WT/L/999/Add.7 and WT/L/999/Add.8. 2 WT/L/1029, WT/L/1029/Add.1 , WT/L/1029/Add.2 and WT/L/1029/Add.3 . 3 WT/L/1051 and WT/L/1051/Add.1 . 4 WT/L/1085. 5 WT/L/1107. 6 WT/L/995. 7 Column one of the Annex lists the Members; column two indicates the Member's date of implementation of HS2017 changes; and column three indicates whether the Member has also implemented the corrections and complementar y amendments to HS Chapter 44. WT/L/1127 - 2 - Considering that other Members not listed in the Annex to this Decision may already have domestically implemented HS2017 changes, or may intend to do so, pending incorporation of su ch changes into their Schedules of Concessions, and may also desire to be covered by this waiver; Decides, in view of the exceptional circumstances, to suspend the applicati on of the provisions of Article II of GATT 1994: a) for those Members listed in the An nex, until 31 December 2022; and b) for any other Member not listed in the Annex that notifies the Committee on Market Access of its wish to be included in the waiver decision from the date of implementation of the HS2017 changes for that Member until 31 December 2022; to the extent necessary for the purpose of enabling such Mem bers to domestically implement the recommended amendments to the Harmonized System nomenclature pending incorporation of such changes into their Schedules of Concessions, subject to the following conditions: i. Members covered by paragraphs (a) and (b) of thi s Decision shall, where necessary, promptly enter into negotiations and/or consultations with interested Members pursuant to paragraphs 1 -3 of Article XXVIII of GATT 1994; ii. The negotiations and/or consultations mentioned above shall, to the extent possible , be completed by 31 December 2022; and iii. In accordance with the provisions of Article XXVIII:3 of GATT 1994, applied mutatis mutandis to the present waiver, pending the entry into force of the results of the negotiations and/or consultations mentioned above , the other Members will be free to suspend concessions initially negotiated with the Member concerned to the extent that they consider that adequate compensation is not offered by the Member concerned. WT/L/1127 - 3 - ANNEX MEMBERS WHICH HAVE REQUESTED TO BE COVERED BY THE WAIVER UNDER THE ABOVE DECISION Member Date of Implementation of the WCO Council Decision : Adopted on 27 June 2014 Adopted on 11 June 2015 1. Argentina 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 2. Australia 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 3. Brazil 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 4. Canada 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 5. China 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 6. Colombia 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 7. Costa Rica 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 8. Dominican Republic 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 9. Ecuador 1 September 2017 1 September 2017 10. El Salvador 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 11. European Union 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 12. Guatemala 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 13. Hong Kong, China 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 14. India 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 15. Israel 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 16. Kazakhstan 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 17. Korea, Republic of 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 18. Macao, China 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 19. Montenegro 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 20. New Zealand 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 21. Norway 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 22. Pakistan 1 July 2017 1 July 2017 23. Paraguay 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 24. The Philippines 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 25. Russian Federation 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 26. Switzerland 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 27. Thailand 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 28. The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu 31 December 2020 31 December 2020 29. United States 1 January 2017 31 December 2017 30. Uruguay 1 January 2017 1 January 2017 __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_WT_DS_497-14.pdf

s_WT_DS_497-14

WT/DS497/14 12 de noviembre de 2019 (19-7733) Página: 1/1 Original: inglés BRASIL - DETERMINADAS MEDIDAS RELATIVAS A LA TRIBUTACIÓN Y LAS CARGAS INFORME DE SITUACIÓN RELATIVO A LA APLICACIÓN DE LAS RECOMENDACIONES Y RESOLUCIONES DEL OSD PRESENTADO EL BRASIL La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 11 de noviembre de 2019, dirigida por la delegación del Brasil al Presidente del Órgano de Solución de Diferencias, se distribuye de conformidad con el párrafo 6 del artículo 21 del ESD. _______________ El Brasil pres enta este informe de conformidad con el párrafo 6 del artículo 21 del Entendimiento relativo a las normas y procedimientos por los que se rige la solución de diferencias . El 11 de enero de 2019, el Órgano de Solución de Diferencias ("OSD ") adoptó sus recomendaciones y resoluciones en el asunto Brasil - Determinadas medidas relativas a la tributación y las cargas (WT/DS47 2 y WT/DS497) . En la siguiente reunión del OSD, el Brasil informó a este de que se proponía aplicar las recomendaciones y resoluciones del OSD en relación con este asunto. El Brasil y el Japón acorda ron que el plazo prudencial para que el Brasil apli cara las recomendaciones y resoluciones del OSD concluiría el 31 de diciembre de 2019, salvo en lo que se refería a las medidas declaradas subvenciones prohibidas, que el Brasil acordó poner en conformidad el 21 de junio de 2019. Tres programas han expirado antes de la adopción de los informes del Grupo Especial y del Órgano de Apelación : INOVAR -AUTO expiró el 31 de diciembre de 2017, en virtud de la Ley 12,715/2012 ; PATVD expiró el 22 de enero de 2017, en virtud de la Ley 11,484/2007 ; y el Programa de Inclusión Digital expiró el 30 de diciembre de 2015, en virtud de la Ley 13,241/2015 . Estos programas han expirado y no se han renova do. Así pues, no existen otras obligaciones en lo que respecta a las recomendaciones formuladas en relación con esos programas . Por lo que se refiere a las constataciones relativas a los "Processos Produtivos Básicos " (PPBs), el 19 de junio de 2019 el Minist erio de Economía y el Minist erio de Ciencia y Tecnología emitieron l a Orden Interministerial de Aplicación SEPEC/ME/MCTIC Nº 1 por la que se revoca n las órdenes de aplicación que se había constatado que eran incompatibles con los acuerdos abarcados . Además, se han promulgado varias órdenes de aplicación en sustitución de las declaradas incompatibles en las resoluciones de los informes . Esas nuevas órd enes de aplicación no mencionan otros PPB y son compatibles con las obligaciones que incumben al Brasil en el marco de la OMC. En cuanto a las constataciones relativas al Programa Informático y al programa PADIS, el Gobierno del Bra sil se está preparan do para promulgar disposiciones legislativas , consulta ndo a todas las partes interesadas, a fin de modificar las leyes correspondientes para poner esas medidas en conformidad en el plazo prudencial acordado. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NBRA1898A1.pdf

s_G_SPS_NBRA1898A1

G/SPS/N/BRA/1898/Add.1 11 de mayo de 2021 (21-3993) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, recibida el 11 de mayo de 2021 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación del Brasil . _______________ Resolution - RE number 1428, 8 April 2021 (Resolución RE Nº 1428, de 8 de abril de 2021 ) El Proyecto de Resolución Nº 1009, de 27 de enero de 2021 , notificado anteriormente en el documento G/SPS/N/BRA/1898, se ha adoptado como Resolución RE Nº 1428, de 8 de abril de 2021. El texto completo está disponible solamente en portugués y puede descargarse de: https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=12/04/2021&jornal=515&pagi na=131 . Este addendum se refiere a: [ ] la modificación de la fecha límite para la pr esentación de observaciones [X] la notificación de la adopción, publicación o entrada en vigor del reglamento [ ] la modificación del contenido y/o ámbito de aplicación de un proyecto de reglamento previamente notificado [ ] el retiro del reglamento propuesto [ ] la modificación de la fecha propuesta de adopción, publicación o entrada en vigor [ ] otro aspecto: Plazo para la presentación de observaciones : (Si el addendum amplía el ámbito de aplicación de la medida anteriormente notificad a en cuanto a los productos abarcados y/o los Miembros a los que puede afectar, deberá preverse un nuevo plazo para recibir observaciones, normalmente de 60 días naturales como mínimo . En otros casos, como el aplazamiento de la fecha límite anunciada inici almente para la presentación de observaciones, el plazo previsto en el addendum podrá variar.) [ ] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución del addendum a la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : No procede. Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: G/SPS/N/BRA/1898/Add.1 - 2 - International Affairs Office (AINTE) (Asesoría de A suntos Internacionales) Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) (Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria) Teléfono : +(55 61) 3462 5402/5404/5406 Correo electrónico : rel@anvisa.gov.br Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: International Affairs Office (AINTE) (Asesoría de Asuntos Internacionales) Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) (Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria) Teléfono : +(55 61) 3462 5402/5404/5406 Correo electrónico : rel@anvisa.gov.br __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_WT_MIN24_ST14.pdf

r_WT_MIN24_ST14

WT/MIN(24)/ST/14 26 février 2024 (24-1434) Page: 1/2 Conférence m inistérielle Treizième session Abou Dhabi, 26 -29 février 2024 Original: anglais DÉCLARATION DE S.E. M. KOSTANTINOS FRAGOGIANNIS VICE -MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGÈRES GRÈCE Je suis ravi de participer à la treizième Conférence ministérielle de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce . Merci beaucoup, Votre Excellence, M. Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi , pour votre hospitalité. Je félicite chaleureusement la Directrice générale, Dre Ngozi , et l'ensemble du Secrétariat de l'OMC pour leurs efforts dans la préparation de cette Conférence. Je suis certain que de s discussions intenses et des sessions propices à la réflexion fourniront des renseignements précieux sur le commerce multilatéral et favoriseront la collaboration internationale. Dans une époque marquée par des tensions géopolitiques complexes et des diff icultés économiques, la politique commerciale multilatérale traverse une période difficile. C'est pourquoi il est plus important que jamais de donner ici, à Abou Dhabi, la priorité au renforcement du système commercial multilatéral. Notre Conférence consti tue une occasion unique de résoudre les problèmes complexes auxquels nous sommes confrontés. Tant pour ce qui est des déséquilibres commerciaux et des obstacles réglementaires que des disparités économiques et des préoccupations environnementales, le progr amme est vaste et varié. Ensemble, nous pouvons saisir cette occasion pour réaffirmer l'importance de la coopération internationale et libérer le plein potentiel du commerce en tant que catalyseur de prospérité et de progrès dans le monde. En renforçant le rôle et l'efficacité de l'OMC, nous pouvons mettre en place un bouclier essentiel face à la fragmentation croissante des questions géoéconomiques et réglementaires. Un commerce ouvert et équitable reste une force majeure de résilience et de relance. Au cours de nos réunions, nous devrions évaluer les progrès réalisés au sein de l'Organisation et tracer la voie à suivre pour l'avenir. Et pourquoi ne pas essayer de nous inspirer de la réussite de la douzième Conférence ministérielle lors de laquelle nous av ons obtenu des résultats significatifs malgré les difficultés? En tant que membre de l'UE, mon pays, la Grèce, défend résolument le système commercial fondé sur des règles . Conformément à l'accord auquel les Membres sont parvenus à Genève en juin 2022, no us sommes déterminés à faire avancer le processus de réforme de l'OMC dans ses trois piliers fondamentaux. Nous attachons une priorité élevée au rétablissement d'un système de règlement des différends pleinement opérationnel tout en veillant également à p réserver ses caractéristiques fondamentales. En outre, l'Organisation doit reprendre sa place d' instance où ont lieu des délibérations pertinentes sur les politiques et qui abordent les sujets essentiels de la politique commerciale mondiale d'aujourd'hui. Parmi ces sujets figurent les politiques industrielles, les difficultés environnementales mondiales et l'inclusivité. WT/MIN(24)/ST/14 - 2 - L'Accord sur les subventions à la pêche de 2022 a représenté une étape importante pour l'Organisation car il s'agissait du premier accor d abordant spécifiquement la durabilité environnementale . La Grèce, ainsi que d'autres États membres de l'UE, a fait partie des premiers à soutenir cet accord. Dans les prochains jours, nous devrions faire fond sur cette réussite et la compléter par des règles additionnelles afin d'atteindre pleinement les cibles de l' objectif de développement durable 14.6 des Nations Unies . Un autre domaine qui demeure très important est le secteur agricole . Le commerce et les marchés des produits alimentaires sont essentiels pour toutes les parties prenantes, aussi bien les producteurs que les consommateurs, et aussi bien les pays développés que les pays en développement. Toutefois, il reste difficile de tr ouver un juste équilibre entre libéraliser le commerce et soutenir les moyens de subsistance des producteurs . Néanmoins, comme le monde fait actuellement face à une crise alimentaire mondiale sans précédent, une réponse collective et urgente est nécessaire . Les conflits, la pandémie de COVID -19, les perturbations des chaînes d'approvisionnement et les chocs liés au climat ont eu de graves répercussions sur le commerce des produits agricoles. C'est pourquoi le moment est bien choisi pour que la politique commerciale contribue à la durabilité de nos systèmes alimentaires . La Grèce souhaite progresser dans la réforme du commerce des produits agricoles afin de promouvoir une concurrence loyale et une production durable. Si l'agriculture a toujours été un domain e important du commerce, il est essentiel de reconnaître également l'importance de nouveaux domaines. En particulier, le commerce électronique est une composante essentielle et dynamique de notre économie. Par conséquent, nous devons élaborer des règles mo ndiales, transparentes et efficaces dans ce domaine tout en évitant d'introduire des obstacles aux transactions électroniques. À cet égard, nous soutenons résolument le maintien du moratoire sur l'imposition de droits de douane sur les transmissions électr oniques . Nous espérons que nous réussirons à convenir d'une solution permanente à cette question. Dans le même temps, l'aboutissement des négociations dans le cadre de l'Initiative liée à la Déclaration conjointe sur la facilitation de l'investissement po ur le développement envoie un message fort sur la capacité du système commercial multilatéral à produire des résultats en restant flexible et inclusif. Enfin, je souhaite la bienvenue à nos nouveaux Membres, les Comores et le Timor -Leste . Leur accession montre clairement l'importance d'investir dans l'Organisation. Alors que nous entamons les négociations, nous devons absolument respecter les principes fondamentaux de l'OMC: équité, inclusivité et recherche d'une prospérité partagée . Ces principes devraient guider nos discussions alors que nous nous efforçons de trouver des solutions qui concilient les intérêts des diverses parties prenantes et qui favori sent un développement durable pour tous. Unissons nos forces et agissons collectivement pour assurer la réussite de la Conférence ministérielle! __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_WT_DS_291-37A155.pdf

r_WT_DS_291-37A155

WT/DS291/37/Add.155 16 juillet 2021 (21-5648) Page: 1/1 Original: anglais COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES – MESURES AFFECTANT L'APPROBATION ET LA COMMERCIALISATION DES PRODUITS BIOTECHNOLOGIQUES RAPPORT DE SITUATION DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE Addendum La communication ci -après, datée du 15 juillet 2021 et adressée par la délégation de l'Union européenne au Président de l'Organe de règlement des différends, est distribuée conformément à l'article 21:6 du Mémorandum d'accord sur le règlement des différends. _______________ Rapport de situation sur la m ise en œuvre des recommandations et décisions de l'ORD concernant le différend Communautés européennes – Mesures affectant l'approbation et la commercialisation des produits biotechnologiques (WT/DS291 ) Après être parvenue à des solutions mutuellement conv enues avec l'Argentine (document WT/DS293/41) et le Canada (document WT/DS292/40), l'Union européenne reste prête à poursuivre ses discussions avec les États -Unis dans le but de régler ce différend et les questions connexes. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_TPR_G425.pdf

q_WT_TPR_G425

RESTRICTED WT/TPR/G/ 425 23 March 2022 (22-2456) Page: 1/27 Trade Policies Review Body Original: English /French TRADE POLICY REVIEW REPORTS BY SWITZERLAND AND LIECHTENSTEIN Pursuant to the Agreement establishing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization), the policy statement by Switzerland and Liechtenstein is attached. Note: This report is subject to restricted circulation and press embargo until the end of the first session of the meeting of the Trade Policy Review Body on Switzerland and Liechtenstein. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 2 - Contents 1 REPORT BY SWITZERLAND ................................ ................................ ........................... 3 1.1 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 3 1.2 Economic Context ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 4 Competitiveness and external environment ................................ ................................ ... 4 Economic developments ................................ ................................ ............................. 5 1.3 Economic Policy ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 8 Foreign economic policy strategy ................................ ................................ ................. 8 Emerging from the COVID -19 crisis and long -term growth policy ................................ ..... 9 Monetary policy ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 10 Fiscal policy ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 11 Micro, small and medium -sized enterprises (MSMEs) ................................ .................... 11 Innovation policy ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 12 1.4 Trade Policy ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 13 Overview ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 13 WTO ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 13 Other multilateral and plurilateral initiatives ................................ ................................ 15 Preferential relations ................................ ................................ ................................ 15 1.4.4.1 European Union ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 15 1.4.4.2 Free trade partners ................................ ................................ ............................... 16 Trade and development ................................ ................................ ............................ 16 Trade and sustainability ................................ ................................ ............................ 17 1.5 Outlook ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 18 2 REPORT BY LIECHTENSTEIN ................................ ................................ ....................... 19 2.1 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 19 2.2 Trade and E conomic Policy Environment ................................ ................................ ........ 19 Economic growth ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 21 The economic sectors ................................ ................................ ............................... 22 State activities ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 25 2.3 Trade Policy Developments and Future Policy Directions ................................ .................. 26 The World Trade Organization (WTO) ................................ ................................ ......... 26 The European Economic Area (EEA) ................................ ................................ ........... 26 The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) ................................ ............................... 27 Customs Union/Economic Integration with Switzerland ................................ ................. 27 WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 3 - 1 REPORT BY SWITZERLAND 1.1 Introduction Switzerland submits this general policy statement as part of the sixth joint Trade Policy Review of Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The Swiss economy is among the most internationally integrated worldwide . Lacking natural resources, landlocked in Europe, Switzerland's prosperity depends on competitive businesses that succeed in international trade through innovative, high value -added goods and services. Since the last Trade Policy Revie w in 2017, the Swiss economy has continued to perform well, in spite of adverse circumstances . Since 2020, the international economic environment has been characterized by a severe global economic and health crisis, triggered by the emergence of the COVID -19 pandemic . This has been followed by a strong economic recovery, albeit one that has been uneven across countries . At the end of 2021, a new wave of COVID -19, combined with global bottlenecks in the supply of raw materials and intermediate goods and a sh arp increase in inflation created a challenging environment. The Swiss economy and trade proved to be relatively resilient by international standards during the COVID -19 crisis . This strong performance is due to a number of factors : a diversified economic structure, a high degree of international openness, a high -quality education system, a flexible labour market, a moderate tax burden, sound public finances, well -established cooperation between social partners, and political stability. The Government ackno wledges that further sustained efforts are required in order to maintain and strengthen Switzerland's competitiveness in a fast -changing world . In 2021, it updated its foreign economic policy strategy, which provides a higher level of guidance for Switzerl and's foreign economic policy measures while respecting the country's international commitments . In the same year, the Federal Council adopted the COVID -19 transition strategy, which aims to strengthen the economy's long -term recovery and increase growth potential . The strategy aims to improve growth in gross domestic product ( GDP) per capita and labour productivity, as well as to strengthen competition in the domestic market. As outlined in the new foreign economic policy strategy and the COVID -19 transition strategy for economic policy, creating and maintaining opportunities for Swiss -based businesses abroad through trade and investment remains a key policy objective for Switzerland, taking account of sustainability considerations . The rules -based multilateral trading system developed within the framework of the WTO provides the institutional bases and regulatory framework for predictable, non -discriminatory global trade and is an essential bulwark against protectionism . For Switzerland, maintaining the integrity and further strengthening the role and relevance of the WTO are essential for sustaining global economic development and growth, and thereby contributing to the economic recovery from the COVID -19 pandemic. Switzerland's trade policy priorit y on multilateral, non -discriminatory rules is complemented by a goal of continuous expansion and deepening of trade relations through regional and bilateral approaches, both with the European Union ( EU) and with partners worldwide. Switzerland attaches high importance to reducing gaps in the level of development between nations, to promoting the further integration of developing countries into the global economy, and to the need to make economic development more sustainable . The Gover nment also takes seriously public concerns about the negative impact of globalization and structural changes in the economy . In this context, Switzerland strongly supports the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and measures that promote socially and environmentally sustainable economic growth. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 4 - 1.2 Economic Context Competitiveness and external environment As a medium -sized economy with few natural resources, Switzerland is highly dependent on foreign trade, whether it be imports of raw materials and intermediate goods or a dynamic export economy . In this context, the Swiss economy has been successful at product transformation and generation of a sizeable share of domestic value -added on export products . Around 75 % of Swiss exports of goo ds and services corresponds to domestic value creation . The remaining 25 % relates to imported inputs . Known for the export of specialist niche products and higher -end quality goods, Switzerland is firmly integrated into global value chains . In terms of val ue-added, it is estimated that, over the past 15 years, the contribution of goods' exports to GDP was around 40 % on average . This strong outward orientation of the Swiss economy has been one of the pillars of Swiss growth for many years. Switzerland is als o one of the most innovative and competitive economies in the world . For some time now, it has consistently ranked first in the Global Competitiveness Index compiled by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and partner institutions . Switzerland is also ranked fir st in the Global Innovation Index . In recent years, it has fallen a few places in the World Bank's ease of d oing business ranking and is now ranked 36th out of 190 economies . A combination of factors underpinning these results has contributed to the resili ence of the Swiss economy in recent years, for example during the financial crisis or the coronavirus crisis. For a small, land -locked country in Europe, Switzerland remains mor e susceptible than other, larger economies to changing circumstances in the ext ernal environment . An important determinant for the Swiss economy generally is the economic performance of the European Union : around two thirds of Swiss imports of goods are from the EU (2021 : approx . CHF 135 billion ), while around 50% of Swiss exports (2021 : approx . CHF 130 billion ) go to the EU, making it by far Switzerland's most important trading partner. Other major trading partners are the United States, China and Japan, followed by other countries in Asia, the Americas and the Mi ddle East. In terms of Switzerland's foreign trade, the past few years have been characterized by increased specialization towards certain high value -added products, especially those produced by the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, but also by the w atchmaking, precision instrument, or metal and machinery industries . Chemicals and pharmaceuticals have been particularly successful, with markedly strong growth in exports and imports, accounting for 50% of exports and 27% of imports of goods in 2021 . As a result of this growing specialization, Switzerland's foreign trade, and thus the Swiss economy as a whole, ha ve become less sensitive to exchange rate fluctuations . Added to this is the fact that Switzerland has a large service sector that also specializ es in high value -added areas and is therefore less dependent on, for example, the hotel and restaurant industry and tourism. Since 2020, the international economic environment has been characterized by a severe global economic crisis, triggered by the emer gence of the COVID -19 pandemic in early 2020, which has hit world trade and the economies of Switzerland's main trading partners hard . To combat the spread of the virus, governments shut down entire sectors of the economy, leading to a collapse in demand a nd trade . At the same time, different governments introduced massive public aid programmes to support the affected sectors and the economy as a whole . Subsequently, further waves of the coronavirus occurred , trigger ing similar responses, particularly in Eu rope, although on a smaller scale than in the spring of 2020. This was followed by a strong economic recovery, albeit one that has been uneven across countries, while in the third quarter of 2021 the GDP of the United States and China was at a higher level than before the crisis (see table below) . At the end of 2021, economic recovery was h ampered by a new wave of COVID -19, combined with global bottlenecks in the supply of raw materials and intermediate goods and an increase in inflation . However, there are many signs that the situation is expected to normalize and recovery will continue over the next two years . The recovery may be somewhat more hesitant in China, which has been pursuing a "zero -COVID" strategy since the start of the pandemic. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 5 - Table 1.1 International comparison of gross domestic product (GDP) 2020 2021 Change from 2019 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q2 Q3 United States 1.1 1.5 1.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 United Kingdom 1.5 -1.3 5.4 1.1 -2.6 -1.5 Japan 2.3 -0.7 0.5 -0.9 -1.1 -1.9 Euro zone -0.3 -0.2 2.2 2.3 -2.5 -0.3 Germany 0.7 -1.7 2.2 1.7 -2.4 -0.8 France -1.1 0.1 1.3 3.1 -2.9 0.2 Italy -1.6 0.3 2.7 2.6 -3.8 -1.3 Spain 0.2 -0.7 1.2 2.6 -8.3 -5.9 Switzerland -0.1 -0.1 1.6 1.5 -0.4 1.1 Note: Seasonally adjusted real values, change compared to the previous quarter, in %. Source: National statistical offices, State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). Economic developments Over the past two years, the Swiss economy has evolved in response to the coronavirus pandemic and associated containment measures . In the first half of 2020, economic activity collapsed in the wake of the first wave of COVID -19 and the accompanying restrictive measures, both in Switzerland and abroad . This was followed by a strong economic recovery by the winter of 2020/2021, when the recovery was severely hampered by a new outbreak of the COVID -19 pandemic and the introduction of new containment measures . By the summer of 2021, however, most of the restrictive health measu res had been lifted or significantly relaxed . This led to a strong recovery in economic activity in the second and third quarters, driven mainly by private consumption and the recovery of the service sectors that had been affected by the health restriction s (see graph below, left panel) . As a result, GDP exceeded its pre -crisis level in the third quarter of 2021 . With the arrival of the Omicron variant and increased containment measures at the end of 2021, the economic recovery slowed down somewhat, but wit hout leading to a large -scale collapse in economic activity, as had been the case in previous waves (see graph below, right panel). Chart 1.1 GDP growth and weekly economic index (WEI) Note: Left panel : seasonally adjusted real values ; sector input : percentage change from previous quarter. Right panel : WEI – difference compared to the level of the fourth quarter of 2019, in %; GDP: real values seasonally adjusted and corrected for sporting events. Source: State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). -8-6-4-202468 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2019 2020 2021 secondary sector tertiary sectorGraph 1.1 GDP growth and weekly economic index (WEI) hebdomadaire -12,0-10,0-8,0-6,0-4,0-2,00,02,04,0 Jan. 20 Jul. 20 Jan. 21 Jul. 21 Jan. 22 GDP WEIWT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 6 - Thus, the Swiss economy has weathered the crisis relatively well by international standards , especially in comparison to many European countries . There may be a number of reasons for this positive deve lopment : First, the containment measures were more targeted and lasted for a shorter period than in many countries ; second, the structural composition of the economy was beneficial to Switzerland, in particular thanks to the relatively lower importance of the tourism sector, or the higher importance of the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors, which had a stabilizing effect during the crisis ; third, government support policies were introduced in a swift and very targeted manner, which prevented a large numbe r of bankruptcies and job losses. The stabilizing effect of business support measures during the crisis, in particular measures introduced for partial unemployment , is reflected in the change in the unemployment rate in Switzerland . The unemployment rate r ose suddenly during the first wave of COVID -19 in the spring of 2020 . In the summer of 2020, the situation stabilized in the labour market . The unemployment rate then fell sharply from February 2021 to 2.3 % in January 2022. At the same time, there has been a significant increase in employment . Several indicators point to a further improvement in the labour market situation in the coming months. Chart 1.2 Unemployment rate Note: Seasonally adjusted values, in %. Source: State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). The strong global economic recovery, which boosted demand for industrial goods, coupled with limited production capacity in some countries during the pandemic, created significant bottlenecks al ong global value chains . From the second half of 2021, a large proportion of industrial enterprises in Switzerland reported that their production had been limited by a lack of raw materials and intermediate goods . The metal products industry, the machinery sector and the production of electronic products have been particularly affected by these challenges . Although the supply problems are expected to ease slowly, they could persist for several more quarters. The strong economic recovery, industrial bottlene cks and the healthy labour market , among other factors, are increasing upward pressure on prices and raising inflation risks internationally . While at the end of 2021 inflation reached historically high levels in the United States and the euro zone, it rem ained relatively low in Switzerland (see graph 1.3 below) . As most of the factors underlying the international price surge are due to the pandemic and are expected to be temporary, inflationary pressures are likely to recede over time . In Switzerland, ther e is currently no sign of an inflationary spiral, with inflation expectations remaining below the Swiss National Bank's inflation target in both the medium and long term. 2.02.53.03.54.04.5 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TotalGraphique 1.3 Taux de chômageWT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 7 - Chart 1.3 Inflation, international comparison, 2017 –2022 Note: Year-on-year change, in %. Sources: Swiss Federal Statistical Office ; Eurostat ; United States Bureau of Labor Statistics . Despite supply difficulties and increased containment measures in the winter o f 2021/2022, the Swiss federal group of experts expects Switzerland's GDP growth – adjusted for the impact of sporting events – to reach 3.0 % in 2022 (see table below) . During 2022, the slowdown factors are expected to gradually dis appear . Economic growth is expected to accelerate significantly, driven by the catch -up effects of private consumption and investments, but also by exports . For 2023, growth of 2.0 % is expected because of economic normalization . After 2021 (3.3 %), the Swiss economy would thus exp erience two further years of above -average growth. Table 1.2 Forecasts for Switzerland, December 2021 2021 2022 2023 GDP adjusted for sporting events 3.3 3.0 2.0 GDP 3.5 3.2 1.7 Private consumption 2.6 3.8 2.0 Government consumption 6.3 -1.5 -1.9 Investments in construction 1.3 0.0 0.2 Investments in capital goods 3.7 4.0 4.0 Export s 7.9 5.6 4.6 Imports 5.1 5.8 5.2 Employment in full -time equivalent 0.5 1.5 0.9 Unemployment rate in % 3.0 2.4 2.3 Consumer price index 0.6 1.1 0.7 Note: Unless otherwise stated, change in %. GDP and components : seasonally adjusted real values ; foreign trade : without objects of value. Source: Swiss federal group of experts on forecasting. In general, the economic risks for the next few years are on the decline . Uncertainty remains very high, particularly in relation to how the pandemic might develop . Although there are increasing signs that the coronavirus is becoming endemic, which would mean the end of the pandemic, further waves of infection cannot be ruled out in the near future . Possible highly restrictive health measures would then have a serious impact on the recovery. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 8 - Negative impacts on the economic recovery would also be expected if global bottlenecks were to persist longer than expected and if inflation rises were to result in continued pressure on prices with a significantly higher interest rate level . In this event, the existing risks associated with government and c orporate debt would also increase significantly . This is all the more true as public debt has risen sharply in many countries in connection with the economic support measures introduced during the crisis . Further consolidation of public debt would hamper t he recovery . In addition, financial market turbulence might also occur if investors were no longer to view debt levels as sustainable. Risks in the Swiss real estate sector would also increase in the event of a sharp rise in interest rates. This is because property prices have risen more than incomes in recent years, particularly in 2021. The housing vacancy rate is also currently relatively high. In addition, there are global risks emanating from the real estate sector in China . A real estate crisis with a strong impact on demand in China could have a significant impact on the global economy. Conversely, it is also possible that the recovery in Switzerland and other advanced economies will be stronger than antic ipated in the group of expert's forecast s. Faced with limited consumption opportunities, some households have accumulated considerable additional savings since the spring of 2020, some of which could be used for consumer spending. 1.3 Economic Policy Foreign economic policy strategy Given the size of its economy and its limited domestic market, foreign economic activities are essential for Switzerland . The Confederation's foreign economic policy aims to maintain and increase prosperity in Switzerland, while respecting the Sustainable Development Goals . The strategic objectives of this policy are an international regulatory framework with wide participation, non-discriminatory access to international markets , and economic relations that contribute to sustainable development in Switzerland and abroad. In recent years, the global economic, geostrategic, technological and social environment has changed significantly . Rivalry between the major economic powers or the trend towards the formation of regional blocs are on the rise . The COVID -19 pandemic has also re inforced underlying protectionist tendencies and accentuated the challenges related to the resilience of global production and supply chains . Lastly, foreign economic policy issues are increasingly diverse : on the one hand, growing digitali sation is creating new opportunities and calls for new regulatory approaches . On the other hand, Switzerland is committed to achieving climate neutrality by 2050, with the goal of sustainability requiring a "horizontal" integration of environmental and social issues. As these developments have clear implications for Switzerland's foreign economic policy, the Federal Council adopted an updated foreign economic policy strategy on 2 4 November 2021.1 By replacing the 2004 strategy, it is provid ing a higher level of guidance for Switzerland's foreign economic policy measures while respecting the country's international commitments . The strategy takes into account the current external economic situation to ensure that objectives are set transparently and that the concerns of stakeholders are taken into account at an early stage. Thanks to its policy of openness, Switzerland has been able to integrate into the global economy and take advantage of international value chains over the past few decades . The foreign economic policy strategy builds on this achievement and sets out nine priority areas for action: • Focusing on Switzerland's interests – To ensure prosperity and employment, Switzerland aims to provide its businesses, especially its SMEs, with broa d, non-discriminatory access with legal guarantees to well -functioning international 1 Available at: https://www.seco.admin.ch/seco/fr/home/Aussenwirtschaftspolitik_Wirtschaftliche_Zusammenarbeit/aussenwir tschaftsp olitik/aws.html . WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 9 - markets . Switzerland defends its foreign economic policy interests through multilateral, plurilateral and bilateral international economic law instruments and economic and trade diplomacy instruments; • Actively shaping multilateralism – In order to address global challenges, Switzerland is committed to international, ideally multilateral, solutions . It actively participates in relevant forums and promotes interna tional rules and standards, particularly in the multilateral context; • Promoting open and rule s-based trade – Switzerland is committed, under its legislation, to open, barrier -free and rule s-based trade in order to maintain Swiss standards; • Prioritizing key partners – The EU remains Switzerland's most important economic partner . In addition, Switzerland is continuously reviewing how to deepen economic relations with its key trading partners and is committed to the effective integration of developing and emer ging countries into the global economy; • Building resilience through diversification – Switzerland is creating the best possible conditions for diversifying supply chains, and explor ing the potential for regional and plurilateral economic agreements . It see ks opportunities to strengthen international cooperation in the area of critical goods from a supply perspective . In principle, it does not envisage adopting state measures to repatriate production processes to Switzerland; • Contributing to environmental an d social sustainability – Switzerland promotes sustainable trade and international standards for the protection of the environment, human rights and workers' rights . It is also committed to corporate social responsibility; • Integrating the digital economy – Given its high economic and scientific ranking , Switzerland is committed to the creation of international rules for digital trade and the free flow of data . In various international organizations, it promotes its interests in the development of sustainabl e and widely supported solutions for the digital economy; • Increasing transparency and participation – Switzerland pursues a foreign economic policy that is transparent, clear and open to the concerns of stakeholders . It systematically informs the general p ublic about its activities in this area and continuously seeks dialogue with the stakeholders concerned; • Taking into account interactions with domestic policy – Switzerland carefully considers any new regulations and explores the approaches already adopted by its main economic partners . Thus, it understands the impact of regulations on both foreign and domestic economic policy . In doing so, its focus is on the benefit to the economy as a whole. Emerging from the COVID -19 crisis and long -term growth policy As a result of COVID -19, in 2020 Switzerland experienced its most severe economic downturn since 1975 . As in many other countries, an unprecedented level of restrictions had to be imposed on the Swiss economy to protect the population from the pandemic . Thanks to state support measures such as COVID -19 loans, extended partial unemployment compensation , loss-of-earnings allowances for the self -employed, parents and persons in quarantine, as well as comprehensive aid for severely affected businesses, waves of bankruptcies were avoided and people's incomes secured. With its COVID -19 transition strategy for economic policy, adopted on 1 8 June 2021, the Federal Council aims to support the normalization of the economy and strengthen the long -term recovery . It has adopted various temporary measures for the recovery phase, such as the tourism recovery programme or the "Swiss Innovation Power" impulse programme, which facilitates access for SMEs to financing for innovation projects. In order to ensure the long -term re covery of the economy as a whole and to increase growth potential, the Federal Council's priority must be to sustainably improve economic conditions . In principle, Switzerland already offers excellent conditions such as a high -quality education system, a WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 10 - high degree of international openness, a flexible labour market, a moderate tax burden and sound public finances . However, a progress report in 2019 drew attention to the fact that Switzerland lost ground in the years leading up to the COVID -19 crisis . GDP per capita growth and labour productivity growth were at best average compared to other Organi zation for Economic Co -operation and Development ( OECD ) countries . In recent years, Switzerland has fallen behind in several areas of international comparisons (for example in the OECD's Product Market Regulation (PMR) indicators or in the WEF's Global Competitiveness Report) . A further potential for improvement lies in particular in strengthening competition in the domestic market in order to overcom e the rather slow productivity growth of domestic -market -oriented sectors compared to the highly productive export sector. In addition, the Swiss economy will face various challenges in the coming years . Due to changing demographics, the proportion of pers ons reaching retirement age is expected to rise from around 19 % in 2022 to around 25 % in 2045, which will be accompanied by a decrease in the share of the working population in the total population . Demographic changes will also lead to additional expendit ure on health care and retirement provision, which will increase the pressure on ensuring sound public finances . Two other major challenges are the outstanding questions over future economic integration into the EU internal market and the implementation of a cost -effective climate policy. In view of these challenges, action is needed in a number of areas . In its growth policy to date, the Federal Council has consistently emphasized : (i) the importance of a high degree of openness to foreign trade ; and (ii) the importance of high -quality education and a high level of labour -market participation in order to address the shortage of skilled workers and enhance the potential of the labour force . Furthermore, it emphasized that : (iii) effective and timely regulati ons and a pro-innovation environment ; coupled with (iv) dynamic competition, are essential for innovative businesses to thrive . The pandemic has also shown that : (v) sound public finances make a decisive contribution to the State's ability to act in a cris is. The prerequisites for such sound public finances are efficient public services and a tax system that avoids distorting effects while remaining attractive by international standards . Finally, (vi) an effective and efficient environmental and climate pol icy is essential for sustainable growth. Monetary policy Between 2017 and 2019, the Swiss National Bank (SNB) maintained an expansionary monetary policy . It continued to rely on the negative policy rate and the negative interest rate that banks and other f inancial market players pay on their SNB sight assets, as well as on the willingness of the SNB to intervene in the foreign exchange market where necessary . Both these measures remained essential to ensure appropriate monetary conditions . Annual inflation remained low and the inflation outlook moderate . By December 2017, the Swiss franc had returned, in real trade -weighted terms, to roughly the same level as before the abandonment of the minimum exchange rate against the euro in January 2015, whic h was followed by a significant appreciation of the franc . Nevertheless, the Swiss franc remained highly valued and the situation on the foreign exchange market fragile. In 2020, the coronavirus crisis posed a significant challenge to monetary policy . Inflation has moved into negative territory . At the same time, the Swiss franc came under strong upward pressure due to its safe haven status . In these circumstances, an expansionary monetary policy remained necessary . The SNB's willingness to increase its int ervention in the foreign exchange market and the SNB's negative policy rate were key to countering the upward pressure on the Swiss franc . In addition, the SNB took measures to ensure the supply of credit and liquidity to the economy . In particular, it cre ated the COVID -19 refinancing facility (FDR), which allows banks to refinance their corporate lending under the State -guaranteed COVID -19 loan programme at the SNB's policy rate ; it raised the threshold for exemption from the negative interest rate on sigh t assets held with the SNB; and it recommended to the Federal Council, after consultation with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA), that the anti -cyclical capital buffer be deactivated . The SNB also offered USD liquidity in consultatio n with the Federal Reserve. In 2021, the expansionary monetary policy remained unchanged and thus contributed to further recovery from the recession triggered by the coronavirus pandemic and the associated containment measures . The Swiss franc remained hig hly valued and occasionally came under pressure to appreciate . In view of the rise in inflation abroad and in Switzerland, the SNB has allowed WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 11 - some nominal appreciation of the Swiss franc . This helped to offset rising prices in Switzerland, as appreciation of the franc made imports cheaper, thereby helping to stabilize prices in Switzerland. Fiscal policy Switzerland's fiscal policy is, to a large extent, determined by the so -called debt brake rule, established in 2003 and amended in 2010 . This rule calls f or balanced federal budgets . However, a budget balance must be achieved over the economic cycle in order that automatic stabili zers can perform their function in cyclical upturns and downswings . Spending overruns are therefore expected to be redressed when the economy recovers. Following the introduction of the debt brake, structural surpluses have been consistently achieved, reducing the public debt . The strong initial financial situation thus afforded the Federal Council the flexibility to act swiftly and extensively to support the economy and households during the COVID -19 pandemic . Consequently, the federal budget was in deficit in 2020 and 2021 . The pandemic -related debt must be wholly reduced . This will ensure that the federal budget remains strong in the future and is prepared for future challenges and crises. While the debt brake is an efficient fiscal rule for management of the budget in the short and medium term, it will not be sufficient to solve long -term structural problems, such as an ageing population and its implication for social security . Challenges of this kind need to be tackled with dedicated reforms . In December 2021, the Parliament passed the AVS 21 reform . The reform seeks to ensure the financial equilibrium of the Old Age and Survivors Insurance (AVS) and to safeguard the level of benefits in the AVS . Essentially, it involves standardizing the retirement age by raising the age for women by one year to 65, in line with that for men . Extra funding is to be provided through VAT, w hich is to be increased by 0.4 percentage points . The referendum deadline is April 2022. In 2019, the Tax Reform and Financing of the AVS (RFFA) was accepted by a popular vote . Corporate tax reform was necessary, as some tax advantages no longer met the requirements of the international community . Meanwhile, the AVS is facing financial challenges as it has to provide pensions to an ever -increasing number . The next corporate tax reform will be carried out by implementing the two pillars of the OECD tax ref orm. The required 15 % minimum taxation (pillar 2) is due to come into effect in January 2024 through a Constitutional amendment . However, the national implementation of the transfer of taxing rights to market States (pillar 1) cannot yet be decided, as ada ptations relating to international law are required in advance. Micro, small and medium -sized enterprises (MSMEs) While Switzerland lacks an official definition of a micro, small and medium -sized enterprise (MSME), any business venture, whatever its legal form and activity, is considered an MSME if it employs fewer than 250 persons . Switzerland has almost 600,000 MSMEs, which account for more than 99 % of all its companies and generate two thirds of all its jobs . In 2019, 42 % of Swiss exports were attributed to MSMEs . As for imports, MSMEs accounted for 59 % of inflows. To ensure prosperity and employment, it is important for companies, especially MSMEs, to have access to open markets . For small companies with no overseas presence and limited resources, an ope n trade policy is crucial . Simple procedures and legal certainty regarding market access are thus essential . Reducing technical barriers to trade is essential in this context. Foreign economic policy interests are defined by consulting all interested parti es at an early stage . The SME Forum, an extra -parliamentary expert committee established by the Federal Council in 1998, is committed to ensuring that the federal administration pays special attention to small and medium -sized enterprises (SMEs) in its act ivities. During consultation procedures, the SME Forum examines draft laws and ordinances and develops position papers reflecting the SME perspective . It assesses the implementation of the planned measures, particularly the administrative burdens, costs in volved and limitations on entrepreneurial freedom . The Forum also addresses specific areas of existing regulations and proposes simplifications or alternative regulations . The SME Forum provides a place for discussion WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 12 - between its members (most of whom are male and female entrepreneurs) and the federal offices . Both parties thus analyse the concerns and demands of MSMEs. MSMEs attach great importance to simple regulations that are both easy to apply and transparent . The SME portal and the EasyGov.swiss busin ess portal play strategic roles in this respect. The SME portal of the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) is the single window for SMEs . Created almost 20 years ago, it provides a wide range of information for SMEs, from starting up a business t o succession planning : practical information, news articles, key regulations, Government services for SMEs, etc. I t also provides links to e -Government services . In 2021, the SME portal had about 1.8 million individual visitors. In November 2017, the Confederation launched the EasyGov.swiss online window for interactions between businesses and the authorities . At the outset, the platform was mainly used by company founders, who can complete all the administrative procedures required to set up their business online, from registering the business to VAT, social insurance and accident insurance . Currently, some 40 administrative services are available - and the window has over 50,000 users, with a strong growth trend . EasyGov's main aim is thus to reduce the administrative burden on MSMEs . The range of services offered by the authorities will be considerably extended during the 2020-2023 legislative period. The Swiss Export Risk Insurance (SERV) agency is an institution under public law of the Swiss Confederation . SERV covers political and commercial risks in connection with the exportation of goods and services . The insurance and guarantees of SERV provide Swiss exporting companies with cover against non -payment and facilitate the financing of expo rt transactions . SERV's solutions also make it easier for companies to obtain credit or a higher credit limit and help them maintain their liquidity when exporting . SERV's offers are available to all companies, including MSMEs based in Switzerland . Traditionally, MSMEs account for more than two thirds of SERV's customer base. Switzerland Global Enterprise (S -GE) is the official Swiss export promotion organization . In particular, it supports MSMEs in seeking and exploiting export opportunities abroad . S-GE reports on international market developments, offers advice, identifies international contacts, partners and business opportunities and helps to promote Swiss products and services abroad . The organization's branches in 31 countries also provide assistance abroad. Innovation policy In 2016, Switzerland Innovation, a network of independent regional sites for research and innovation, bringing industry and academia together, was inaugurated . It is represented by two hubs centred around the two Federal Institute s of Technology in Zurich and Lausanne and four additional network locations . The network forms an ecosystem that enables innovative universities and businesses to collaborate and use their research results to develop new marketable products and services . Switzerland Innovation is now an important component of the Swiss innovation promotion portfolio : it supplements federal instruments such as Innosuisse, the Swiss innovation agency, as well as regional and cantonal initiatives . Since its launch, the networ k has attracted around 240 companies, including 50 from abroad . Eight hundred new jobs have been created. On 1 January 2018, Innosuisse, the Swiss innovation promotion agency, took on the tasks of the Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) . Innosuisse is a federal institution under public law with legal personality . It is an independent agency in respect of its organization and management . The Federal Council sets strategic objectives and exercises a form of oversight, for example, by checking every year whether the strategic objectives have been achieved. In order for innovation promotion to respond more swiftly to SMEs' changing circumstances and needs, the Federal Law on the Promotion of Research and Innovation (LERI) was amended in 2021. This amendment seeks to give Innosuisse more room for manoeuvre and greater flexibility, including when it comes to promoting innovation projects and start -ups. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 13 - 1.4 Trade Policy Overview In accordance with its foreign economic policy strategy and its COVID -19 transition strategy for economic policy, adopted in November 2021 and June 2021 respectively, Switzerland attaches great importance to trade policy in the pursuit of its objectives (see Sections 1.3.1 and 1.3.2) . Switzerland's trade policy is anchored in the multilateral trading system of the WTO and complemented by a broad range of preferential arrangements with the EU and other partner countries . In addition, Switzerland promotes sustainable trade and international standards for the protection of the enviro nment, human rights and workers' rights. It is important for Switzerland to improve conditions to promote open markets . Thus, Switzerland will remove tariffs on industrial products as of 1 January 2024. The removal of tariffs will benefit Swiss consumers a nd businesses by reducing the price of many consumer goods, production costs and the administrative burden on importing businesses . Trade relations will become more efficient, and competition will be strengthened. On 1 January 2018, Switzerland embarked on the DaziT programme : a large-scale programme to transform its customs procedures . In order to facilitate trade and ease the burden on the economy, the DaziT programme provides for the systematic simplification and full digitali sation of all customs proced ures by the end of 2026 . New applications simplify, inter alia , the customs clearance of goods in tourist traffic and enable mobile payment of the flat -rate fee for heavy goods traffic . The successful implementation of DaziT requires close collaboration wi th national and international partners . Discussions with neighbouring countries' customs administrations and European authorities are under way to simplify and speed up border crossings. WTO For Switzerland's economy, a strong, transparent and predictable rules-based multilateral trading system remains central . The WTO continues to form the indispensable basis of global trade and is the only mechanism with the potential to produce truly multilateral, inclusive solutions in the area of trade for a globalized economy. Against the backdrop of the COVID -19 pandemic and its ensuing uncertainties, Switzerland has pursued its active engagement across the WTO agenda in support of the multilateral trading system. The WTO has an important role to play to address the s ocial and economic challenges of the health crisis . The Organization must contribute to global economic recovery and stability by promoting a comprehensive and coordinated response to the pandemic through coherent, effective and targeted trade policies . To increase the production and distribution of essential goods, including vaccines, in all regions of the world, Switzerland supports a holistic approach to the WTO's pandemic response . Keeping markets open, minimizing export restrictions, ensuri ng transparency on trade measures and the state of value chains, and facilitating trade through simplified customs procedures will contribute to the common goal. Intellectual property is a key aspect of the holistic approach . The Agreement on Trade -Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement) promotes partnerships between stakeholders in the research, development and production of new health technologies . The TRIPS Agreement proved its usefulness and effectiveness during the COVID -19 pandemic by acting as an incentive to produce drugs and vaccines of a complex composition quickly and safely . It is crucial that the TRIPS Agreement remains a reliable and predictable legal framework to continue encouraging collaborations between stakeho lders and the effective sharing of know -how and technology. The COVID -19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of preserving and strengthening the multilateral trading system . To realize the full potential of multilateralism, however, all Members must as sume international responsibilities and commitments commensurate with their ability to help strengthen the multilateral trading system . Furthermore, reform of the WTO is necessary in order WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 14 - to better address relevant developments in the global economy and t he needs of business and society. WTO reform should enhance the Organization's three functions . First, as regards the negotiating function, the WTO must demonstrate its ability to conclude multilateral agreements that respond to current challenges, such as the digitali sation of the economy and environmental sustainability . The continuation of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions and reaching a tangible agreement on fisheries subsidies are outcomes that will contribute to the WTO's cr edibility . The matters of special and differential treatment and a level field of competition must be included in the reform. Multilateral solutions continue to be the best way to avoid discrimination between countries and regions . In this regard, Switzerland is open to consideration of various approaches that can add value to the multilateral trading system, including best practices and other non -legally binding commitments. Where agreement among all WTO members is not achievable, plurilateral init iatives are a valuable alternative . In this connection, Switzerland welcomes the recent conclusion of the negotiation on domestic regulation of trade in services and the adoption at the end of 2020 of a set of recommendations in support of MSMEs . The good work on the joint statement initiatives must continue . The aim is to improve conditions for e -commerce, investment facilitation for development, MSMEs, trade and environmental sustainability matters, and trade and gender . All these topics are relevant to t he WTO's modernization. Second, the restoration of a functioning dispute settlement system is a top priority . All Members must engage in constructive dialogue to find concrete solutions . Since 2018, Switzerland has stepped up its participation in the WTO d ispute settlement system and strengthened its capacity in this area . Like several other WTO Members, Switzerland initiated WTO dispute settlement proceedings against US import restrictions on certain steel and aluminium products in July 2018 (DS556) . During the period under review , Switzerland acted as a third party in 22 panel proceedings, 15 of which were related to the US measures on steel and aluminium and the rebalancing measures taken by some Members in response to these measures . As a third party, Switzerland regularly submits written or oral contributions. Third, Switzerland attaches high importance to the WTO's regular work, in particular the monitoring of developments in the trading environment and of compliance by Members with WTO rules, including on transparency . The reform should serve to improve the function of monitoring WTO rules. This implies a systematic improvement in the transparency and operation of committees, including how trade irritants are addressed. Switzerland also strongly support s the aim of making the WTO truly universal through further accession of new Members that meet the Organization's standards. For Switzerland, further reduction of tariff and non -tariff barriers for industrial products and services continues to be of particular interest, along with a strengthening of the regulatory framework for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights . Switzerland also strongly supports WTO work on e -commerce, with a view to fostering digitally enabled trade, particularly for MSMEs and developing countries. With respect to agriculture, Switzerland will pursue its constructive engagement in negotiations, underlining the need to adequately take into account non -trade concerns . During the period under review, Switzer land has demonstrated its commitment by eliminating export subsidies on agricultural products, in accordance with the decision adopted at the Tenth Ministerial Conference (MC10) in Nairobi, which required the national legislation to be amended. Switzerland has successfully completed the process of revising national law on Government procurement to harmonize federal and cantonal legislation and to transpose the requirements of the revised WTO plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) . In force s ince 1 January 2021, the revised federal legislation on Government procurement and the revised GPA provides a modernized regulatory framework that improves legal certainty and simplifies the application of the law, while offering new opportunities to SMEs. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 15 - Switzerland's engagement in the WTO includes an active role in a range of groups of Members sharing common interests, such as the G10 in agriculture, the Friends of the System and the Ottawa Group . During the period under review, Switzerland continued to host a yearly informal WTO ministerial gathering traditionally on the fringes of the World Economic Forum in Davos. Other multilateral and plurilateral initiatives Switzerland actively supports trade and investment -related work in the OECD . The OECD's analytical and policy -oriented output continues to make a valuable contribution to promoting policy coherence, strengthening the multilateral trading system and showing the consequences of protectionism. Switzerland also supports the activities of the UN Confe rence on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in the areas of trade and investment, among others . Analysis, consensus -building and technical assistance by UNCTAD play an important role in helping developing countries better integrate into the global economy, and measure progress towards the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Switzerland closely follows the work of the G20, which gives political impetus to global economic trends . At the invitation of the respective G20 presidencies, Switzerland has partic ipated, as a guest in 2013, and regularly since 2016, in all meetings of the finance track, as well as in those of the Anti -Corruption Working Group (ACWG) . Under Saudi Arabia's presidency in 2020, Switzerland was invited to participate in all G20 meetings . In 2021, under Italy's presidency, Switzerland again participated in the finance track, the ACWG, the Trade and Investment Working Group (TIWG) and the Health Working Group . In the TIWG, Switzerland continued to promote its values of open trade and moder nization of the multilateral trading system. Preferential relations As part of its foreign economic strategy, Switzerland has continued to negotiate, conclude and modernize bilateral and regional preferential agreements that complement and support the multilateral trading system . In 2020, 75 % of Switzerland's merchandise exports went to preferential trading partners . Switzerland aims to further expand and deepen its preferential trading relations. 1.4.4.1 European Union The European Union continues to be Switzerlan d's most important economic partner by far . The close relations between the two sides are reflected in an extensive network of contractual arrangements developed over time . In the area of trade, this network includes a free trade agreement concluded in 197 2 and a range of further agreements, most of which have become effective since 2002 and cover topics such as customs cooperation, agricultural products, technical barriers to trade, land and air transport, government procurement and the free movement of persons. During the period under review, Switzerland and the EU continued to conduct negotiations on an institutional agreement . The institutional agreement aimed to preserve Switzerland's access to the European single market and to create a basis for extend ing this access . On 26 May 2021, due to substantial differences between the parties on key aspects, such as wage protection and the citizens' rights directive, the Federal Council decided not to sign this agreement . However, safeguarding and developing wel l-established bilateral cooperation with the EU remains a priority for the Government. The Federal Council has adopted a series of measures to give positive impetus to relations with the EU . In the short term, the Parliament approved by a large majority on 3 0 September 2021 the liberalization of the second Swiss contribution to certain EU member States . In the medium term, Switzerland proposes to establish a structured high -level political dialogue . Within this framework, a common agenda for furt her cooperation may be developed and monitored . In addition, Switzerland has embarked on a systematic assessment of regulatory differences between Switzerland and the EU, including in the area of domestic market agreements. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 16 - 1.4.4.2 Free trade partners Deepening an d extending Switzerland's preferential trade relations beyond the EU and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Convention also remain major objectives of the Government . These FTAs make an important contribution to sustaining the competitiveness of th e Swiss economy and the country's attractiveness as a business location through improved access to foreign markets and enhanced cooperation on an equal footing with Switzerland's main competitors. With partners outside the Euro -Mediterranean area, Switzerl and is generally seeking FTAs that are comprehensive in scope, including trade in goods, services, investment, intellectual property, competition, government procurement, trade facilitation, and trade and sustainable development provisions. Switzerland neg otiates, concludes and administers its FTAs mostly in association with its EFTA partners . During the period under review, new EFTA free trade agreements were concluded with Ecuador (2018, entry into force in November 2020) and Indonesia (2018, entry into f orce in November 2021), and a substantive agreement was reached with the Mercosur States (2019) . Switzerland signed a bilateral FTA with China in 2013, which entered into force in July 2014. In addition, the existing agreement with Turkey was modernized (2 018, entry into force in October 2021). Switzerland also signed a bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom (2019, entry into force in January 2021). By the end of 2021, Switzerland had 33 FTAs with 43 partner countries outside the EU and EFTA. Together with its EFTA partners, Switzerland is pursuing negotiations with India, Malaysia, Moldova and Viet Nam . In parallel, Switzerland is engaged in negotiations on further development of several existing EFTA free trade agreements, including those with Chile, Mexico and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU). Trade and development Supporting the integration of developing countries into the global economy, a pillar of Swiss foreign policy, remains an objective of Switzerland's new foreign economic strategy . In that context, promotion of trade plays a key role and offers significant opportunities for sustainable economic growth and job creation . Trade promotion is a key objective of Switzerland's development cooperation for the period 2021 -2024, as it has been in previous periods . International trade is a key part of the solution to accelerate recovery from the COVID -19 crisis, especially for developing countries. Switzerland has supported the global Aid for Trade Initiative of the WTO and the OECD since its inc eption in 2005 . During the period under review, Switzerland continued its commitment to the Enhanced Integrated Framework (phase II), which aims to promote the integration of the least developed countries (LDCs) into world trade. In the period under review, Switzerland's trade promotion work focused on strengthening export capabilities of MSMEs in designated partner countries and on facilitating imports into target markets . Several initiatives aiming to improve institutional capacity to participate in international trade and value chains have been carried out in this framework . Similarly, climate change mitigation and adaptation and gender equality are important cross -cutting objectives . The projects, most of which were implemented with partner organiz ations, included: • Provide assistance to customs administrations to strengthen compliance with international standards and best practices in the import, export and transit of goods . This assistance has been put into operation through the World Customs Organ ization's (WCO) Global Trade Facilitation Programme and the World Bank's Trade Facilitation Support Programme, in particular to help WTO members implement the Trade Facilitation Agreement; • Building in -country export know -how (for example, on quality requirements, product labelling and border procedures), in partnership with the International Trade Centre (ITC), and supporting the work of ITC's Trade for Sustainable Development programme WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 17 - and the Standards Map database, whic h aims to provide transparency on voluntary sustainability standards; • Assisting trade policy makers in partner countries to build their capacity in trade negotiations and implementation of trade agreements and unilateral trade policies; • Assisting trade sup port organizations in partner countries in facilitating MSME exports to Switzerland and other European markets; • Establishing local quality assurance systems to help MSMEs' comply with international standards; • Developing investment climate programmes in som e 30 countries, in cooperation with the International Finance Corporation (IFC). Switzerland remains a major donor of the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL) . Along with the International Labour Organization (ILO), Switzerland has committed to promoting comp liance with core labour standards, particularly in the textiles sector (Better Work), supporting MSMEs through the Sustaining Competitive and Responsible Enterprises (SCORE) programme and promoting decent work and productive employment through the Producti vity Ecosystems for Decent Work. During the period under review, Switzerland also became one of the main donors to UNCTAD's programme on E -Commerce and the Digital Economy (ECDE), which aims to create an enabling environment and build capacity in e -commerc e. Trade and sustainability In Switzerland's view, trade must contribute to achieving the goals of sustainable development, as reflected in the United Nations 2030 Agenda, and the challenge of climate change in particular . In the WTO and other internationa l organizations, Switzerland therefore actively advocates policies and rules that promote sustainable development and coherence between trade rules and relevant environmental, labour and social commitments. Within the WTO, besides its active participation in the Committee on Trade and Environment, in November 2020 Switzerland joine d two initiatives that complement multilateral efforts : the trade and environmental sustainability structured discussions (TESSD) and the informal dialogue on plastics pollution a nd environmentally sustainable plastics trade (IDP). Switzerland participates actively in the negotiations on the Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) . This initiative aims to demonstrate the mutual support and complementarity of t rade and environmental policies . The initiative thus provides a systemic contribution to the debate on trade and environment, including within the WTO. During the period under review, as mentioned above, all Switzerland's FTAs with its EFTA partners includ e a chapter on trade and sustainable development . Dialogue is taking place with a number of partner countries on the implementation of the related commitments. In October 2017, Switzerland ratified the Paris Agreement on climate change, which promotes, inter alia , the phasing out of fossil fuels . As such, Switzerland supports fossil fuel subsidy reform in the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform group . This group is committed to the phasing -out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, in line with the G20 and APEC statements. Switzerland is a signatory to the Basel Convention, an amendment to which entered into force on 5 December 2019, prohibiting the transboundary movement of hazardous waste (destined for final storage, recovery or recycling) between OECD an d non -OECD countries. In January 2020, the Government adopted a revised Plan on Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility and a revised National Action Plan on the Implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights . These plan s aim to increase coherence between Switzerland's economic policy and the country's obligations to promote responsible business conduct and human rights . It also involves setting expectations towards Swiss -based businesses and planning various awareness -raising and training initiatives . This includes the promotion of due WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 18 - diligence in the responsible conduct of business following the UN Guiding Principles as well as the relevant OECD instruments for multinational enterprises. 1.5 Outlook During the period under review, Switzerland's economic policy has remained focused on maintaining and improving Switzerland's prosperity, while respecting the Sustainable Development Goals. During the COVID -19 crisis, Switzerland benefited from a number of stabilizing factors, su ch as the diversified economic structure, a high degree of international openness, a high -quality education system, a flexible labour market, a moderate tax burden and sound public finances . Following the unprecedented economic downturn triggered by the COVID -19 pandemic, Switzerland adopted the COVID -19 transition strategy, which aims to strengthen the economy's long -term recovery and address shortcomings in the Swiss economy, such as insufficient labour productivity and the need to strengthen competitio n in the domestic market. For Switzerland to continue to succeed in a rapidly evolving, interdependent global economy, open markets and non -discriminatory trade rules are of fundamental importance . At the same time, Switzerland is mindful of a strong need to make trade work more and better for developing countries, in particular LDCs, and for sustainable development more generally in line with the UN 2030 Agenda . Switzerland will therefore actively pursue mutually supportive economic, social and environment al policies both at the domestic and global levels. For Switzerland, the WTO remains the anchor of its trade policy . Switzerland will continue to strongly support and actively contribute to preserving a well -functioning multilateral trading system and to k eeping it relevant for the membership and the global economy . Switzerland thus supports the necessary reform of the WTO . In Switzerland's view, while maintaining the aim of multilateral solutions at the centre, further developing and reinforcing the WTO's regulatory framework will also require variable approaches to address the wide range of interests and reflect the different stages of development of Members. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 19 - 2 REPORT BY LIECHTENSTEIN 2.1 Introduction In 2019, the Principality of Liechtenstein celebrated the 300th anniversary of its existence within unchanged national borders. Liechtenstein 's territory today covers an area of 160 km2, making it the fourth smallest state in Europe. The settlement area amounts to 11%, while 42% of the national territory is considered forest area, 33% agricultural area, and 15% unproductive area. The Liechtenstein Constitution, which is still in force today, was adopted in 1921. In 1923, Liechtenstein and Switzerland concluded a Customs Treaty, which will thus have its 100th anniversary next year. Moreover, it was during this time that the Swiss Franc was introduced as Liechtenstein 's currency. These steps had a very positive economic effect on the country, although the actual upswing in Liechtenstein began only afte r 1945. In addition to the Customs Treaty, cooperation with Switzerland today is based on more than one hundred other treaties, such as the Currency Treaty and agreements in areas such as education, intellectual property, agriculture, road transport, and indirect taxes. Milestones in the recognition of Liechtenstein as an independent member of the international community were its accession to the Council of Europe in 1978, its accession to the UN in 1990, its admission to the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) in 1991, and its accession to the World Trade Organi zation (WTO) in 1995. Moreover, Liechtenstein has been a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) since 1995 and an associate member of Schengen -Dublin since 2011. Its economic foreign policy is built upon four pillars: (i) the inclusion in the Swiss customs and currency union; (ii) the participation in the European Single Market through the Agreement on the EEA; (iii) a broad network of free trade agreements concluded through EFTA and (iv) the m embership in the WTO. Unhindered access to the European Single Market via the EEA Agreement constitutes a comparative advantage and an essential factor for the security and stability of the Liechtenstein economy. EEA membership has opened up new business o pportunities, leading to further diversification of the Liechtenstein economy and has positioned Liechtenstein as a reliable partner in Europe. At the same time, the Customs and Currency Treaties guarantee market access to Switzerland. The overall outcome of Liechtenstein 's EEA membership is therefore very positive, which is underlined by consistently very high levels of approval for EEA membership among businesses, the population, and policymakers. The report on the Sixth Trade Policy Review of Switzerland and Liechtenstein presents the developments in the economic union between Switzerland and Liechtenstein during the past four years. It simultaneously reflects the high degree of Liechtenstein 's integration in the EEA, which forms the legal framework for economic cooperation between the three EEA EFTA States (Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway) and the EU member States. As a party to the EEA Agreement, Liechtenstein fully participates in the EU' s Internal Market, which is based on the principle of the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital, with uniform and common rules governing competition, including state aid. In addition, the EEA Agreement covers cooperation in other areas, such as research and development, education, social policy, the environment, consumer protection, tourism, and culture. Since an open and well -functioning multilateral trading system is fundamental to economic growth and development, the trading system of th e WTO is an essential element of Liechtenstein 's economic policy. Liechtenstein is firmly committed to the rules -based, transparent and open multilateral trading system of the WTO. Liberali zation of trade at multilateral and regional levels (via WTO and EF TA) is a high priority of Liechtenstein 's economic foreign policy. 2.2 Trade and Economic Policy Environment As a small and open economy, Liechtenstein has been significantly affected by the global economic downturn, triggered by the Covid -19 pandemic. Howeve r, contrary to the global financial crisis, when Liechtenstein 's GDP contracted considerably more than in other (larger) economies, the contraction in terms of output does not stand out in the current recession when compared to other (larger) European econ omies. While there had first been a strong decline of external demand, exports have quickly recovered and the labor market has remained remarkably resilient to the WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 20 - downturn. In details, in 2020, direct merchandise exports from Liechtenstein amounted to CHF 2.86 billion, a significant decline of -16.4% from the previous year, while direct imports also decreased significantly by -17.0% to CHF 1.65 billion. While merchandise exports were severely hit during the first wave of the pandemic in early 2020, Liechte nstein 's economy has benefited from a strong recovery in external demand since the second half of 2020. Notwithstanding the significant drop in output, Liechtenstein 's economy is expected to remain resilient. Similarly, even during the challenging time of the Covid -19 pandemic, Liechtenstein 's government budget has remained remarkably sound. Liechtenstein 's public finances are characterized by virtually zero debt (CHF 37 million or 0.6% of GDP in 2019) and large financial reserves. Between 2014 and 2019, Li echtenstein has reported budget surpluses between 2% and 4% of GDP annually (the surplus amounted to 3.7% of GDP in 2019, up from 3% in 2018), leading to an increase in total financial reserves at the overall government level (state, local government and s ocial insurances) to CHF 6.7 billion in 2019, slightly exceeding GDP in that year. The considerable level of stability and resilience of Liechtenstein 's economy is characterized by some important institutional specifics. In particular, the strong industria l and manufacturing base, contributing almost four times as much to gross value added (GVA) as financial services, differentiates Liechtenstein from other highly industrialised economies and financial centers. In light of the customs union with Switzerland and the membership in the EEA, the financial sector and the real economy enjoy full market access to both the Swiss market and the European Single Market. The EEA membership is not only central for Liechtenstein 's international integration efforts, but al so implies that the financial sector is fully regulated by EU standards. Additionally, the customs and currency union with Switzerland and the associated membership in the Swiss franc currency area also generally contribute to the stability of the economy. The industrial sector includes some highly successful niche players in global markets, with companies showing considerable flexibility in adjusting to changing structural circumstances. This flexibility results from the need to face strong competition in global markets and to be highly innovative to increase productivity against the background of a strong appreciation of the Swiss franc over the last years. Furthermore, high equity ratios in the non -financial corporate sector, high liquid reserves and no d ebt in the public sector as well as high incomes and wealth in private households increase the resilience of the whole economy, as temporary shocks can be better cushioned. Finally, Liechtenstein 's economy is characteri zed by a high degree of diversificati on, including within the different sectors of its economy. In an environment where economies are increasingly internationally linked and globally dependent, which has become apparent with the effects of the Covid -19 pandemic, it is a central priority of th e Liechtenstein Government to promote conditions for business activities which are stable and advantageous. In addition to political continuity, this requires a predictable legal and social as well as a liberal economic order. The level of State interventi on in economic processes has been kept low for most of the reporting period. However, in order to mitigate the economic consequences of business closures and other health -related counter -measures ordered by the authorities since the outbreak of the pandemi c, Government and Parliament as well as local authorities have adopted a number of temporary support measures, including in particular a comprehensive fiscal support package adopted as early as in March 2020. These include making interest -free transitional loans available to MSMEs, a provisional deferral of the payment of social insurance contributions and taxes, financial support for self -employed affected directly or indirectly by administrative lockdown measures, and the granting of short -time work allow ances. Most of these support measures have been phased out in the meantime. However, short -time work allowances, which have helped to avoid temporary lay -offs, will continue until the end of March 2022. The fiscal measures taken by the government to cushi on the economic consequences of the Covid -19 pandemic, which were further extended by municipalities ' budgets, resulted in fiscal stimulus measures amounting to around 2% of GDP. Despite these extra expenditures in light of the global pandemic, and an addi tional extraordinary expenditure of CHF 100 million to increase reserves in the social security system, the budget balance on the state level remained significantly positive in 2020. Indeed, sound public finances have become an important structural charac teristic of Liechtenstein 's economy. Following the financial crisis of 2008, the government enacted structural reforms which significantly lowered public spending, with the public spending ratio standing at 20.9% of GDP in 2019, the lowest level among all European countries. Against this background, today 's public finances reflect a fast and decisive implementation of necessary structural reforms and an efficient decision -making in economic policy in the last decade. Thereby, the public sector has WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 21 - repeatedl y confirmed its flexibility to adapt to new circumstances and its high political effectiveness in implementing structural reforms. During the last four years, the Liechtenstein Government has thus continued to adhere to its long-standing liberal economic policy relying on self -dependent economic actors and confining state interventions to the establishment of framework conditions which are favourable to entrepreneurship. At the same time Liechtenstein has continued to incorporate newly adopted European acq uis communautaire into domestic law: More than 11,300 EEA -relevant legal acts of the European Union are now applicable in Liechtenstein. Moreover, Liechtenstein has further expanded its network of free trade agreements together with the other EFTA Member S tates, who, since 2016, have concluded new preferential agreements with other members of the WTO, such as Georgia, the Philippines, Ecuador and Indonesia. Economic growth Liechtenstein 's economy is small in absolute terms, poor in natural resources and hig hly export -oriented with a large share of gross value added generated in manufacturing. It has shown stable growth in recent years up until 2019, with GDP increasing from CHF 6.1 billion in 2016 to CHF 6.4 billion in 2017 and CHF 6.5 billion in 2018. For t he first time since 2015, the economic momentum of previous years (2016: +1.9%; 2017: +3.7%; 2018: +2.7%) weakened in 2019, with GDP amounting to CHF 6.4 billion, showing a contraction of -2.4%. For many years, Liechtenstein 's economy experienced an above -average growth in employment. The population of Liechtenstein almost doubled since 1970 to 39 '062 by the end of 2020. Over the same period, the number of persons employed in Liechtenstein more than tripled to 40,328. In 2017, the number of jobs started to exceed the number of people residing in Liechtenstein. Due to the strong economic growth over the past decades and the small size of the country, an increasing input of labour from neighbouring countries is required. More than half of the employed persons commute daily, mostly from neighbouring Switzerland and Austria or from Germany. Compared to the total resident population, the high proportion of job creation remains a particular feature of Liechtenstein 's economy. In 2020, 40% of the employment in term s of full -time equivalents was in industry, 60% in services and 0.1% in agriculture. By international comparison, the very low proportion of agriculture and forestry is striking, as is the relatively high proportion of the manufacturing sector. The service s sector is smaller than in other European countries. Unemployment rates in recent years first decreased further from 2.1% in 2016 and 1.8% in 2017 to 1.7% in 2018 and 1.5% in 2019 before slightly rising again to 1.9% in 2020 and dropping to 1.6% in 2021. This underscores the good recovery and the robustness of Liechtenstein 's labour market. Liechtenstein companies create jobs not only in Liechtenstein, but also in significant numbers abroad. The number of employees working abroad for industrial companies w hich are members of the Liechtenstein Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) increased strongly in recent years to 58,201 in 2019. This corresponds to a foreign share of 80%. In the same year, the Liechtenstein banks had, in terms of full -time equivalents , approximately 4,000 employees working abroad (compared to 2,129 in Liechtenstein). Due to its small size, highly developed and open economy, and its competitive industry, Liechtenstein traditionally is highly dependent on foreign demand and has high leve ls of import and exports compared to its GDP. Since trade data is available for Liechtenstein (1995), the country has never registered a negative trade balance. The foreign trade ratio is high by international standards, and can be explained by the high fo reign trade surplus driven by the exports. The most important export destination country for Liechtenstein 's industry and goods production sector besides Switzerland remains Germany, followed by the United States, Austria and France. At the end of 2019, L iechtenstein 's economy accounted for 5,050 commercially active companies. About 88% of them had fewer than ten employees, 98% fewer than 50. The number of companies in Liechtenstein is therefore very large compared to the population: There is one commercia lly active company for nearly every eight inhabitants. The number of commercially active companies in Liechtenstein has nearly doubled in the last two decades. Employment (number of persons employed part -time and full -time) in Liechtenstein is diversified across the economic sectors of industry and manufacturing, financial services, and general services. The ten companies with the WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 22 - highest employment are spread across all three of these economic sectors, accounting for 63% of total employment in Liechtenstei n in 2019. Assets under management of the 13 banks (until 2020: 14 banks) in Liechtenstein and abroad collapsed in the wake of the financial crisis of 2008/2009 and subsequent far -reaching reforms in the financial centre, but since then they have risen aga in quite steadily to over CHF 365.4 billion (including foreign group companies) in 2020. Assets under management in Liechtenstein, excluding foreign group companies, also recovered and exceeded the level of 2007, amounting to CHF 179.2 billion in 2020. In 2020, net new money placed with Liechtenstein financial institutions including foreign group companies amounted to CHF 17.7 billion (2019: CHF 20.4 billion) respectively to CHF 5.5 billion (2019: CHF 1.0 billion) if foreign group companies are not taken in to account. The positive trend in assets under management and net new money thus seems to be continuing in spite of the pandemic. According to estimates by the Boston Consulting Group (2015), Liechtenstein has a share of about 1% in the total of USD 11 '000 billion in cross -border assets under management. Compared to other countries/territories, Liechtenstein 's financial sector can thus be considered a rather small player. As regards insurance services, there were 19 life insurance, 14 non -life insurance, an d three reinsurance undertakings operating with registered offices in Liechtenstein at the end of 2020. 11 undertakings operated as captives. Compared with the previous year, the numbers of insurances slightly decreased. Liechtenstein is the only insurance center that offers insurance undertakings direct access both to the countries of the EEA and to Switzerland. The solvency rate of the Liechtenstein insurance sector was approximately 190% at the end of 2020. The Liechtenstein investment fund center is a r elatively young market that has grown successively in recent years. Thanks to Liechtenstein 's membership in the EEA, investment undertakings benefit from free access to the European market. At the end of 2020, there were 522 investment undertakings in Liec htenstein with net assets of CHF 59.1 billion. Liechtenstein has the same inflation rate as Switzerland (2017: 0.53%, 2018: 0.94%, 2019: 0.36%, 2020: -0.73%). There are no figures available reflecting private consumption or investment in Liechtenstein only . The economic sectors Liechtenstein 's economy is broadly diversified by sectors, businesses and products. The average value added is very high, based on research and development, qualified expertise, a wide range of high -tech and niche products, strong e xport orientation of its industry, and a highly developed financial services sector. Its services sector covers more or less all services of the UN services classification system. The rate of investment in research and development compared to GDP in 2019 s tood at 5.7% or CHF 375.4 million, 98% of the investments made by companies themselves. The 436 new patent applications (2019: 437) at the European Patent Office in 2020 correspond to 11.2 patent applications per 1 '000 inhabitants, which is very high in co mparison with other countries. In 2019, 45.8% of GVA was the result of value added in industrial production and manufacturing, compared to 42.6% in general services, 11.5% in financial services2 and 0.1% in, agriculture, forestry and fishery. The primary sector employs 0.6% of the total workforce, its sha re having further decreased from 0.8% in 2017. In 2020, there were 95 recogni zed farms in Liechtenstein. These managed an agricultural area of 3,584 ha. The average agricultural area per farm was 37.7 ha. In 2016, the 102 recognized farms had managed an av erage usable agricultural area of 35.2 ha per farm. Of the 95 recognized farms, 76 kept cattle in 2020. 2 Traditionally, in Liechtenstein 's statistics, financial and insurance activities, legal and accounting activities as well as activities of head offices were regarded as financial service providers. More recently, statistics take the NACE Rev.2 classification as a reference (Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community). The figure listed for financial services represents activities in accordance with divisions 64 to 66 of that classification system (i.e. fin ancial and insurance activities). WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 23 - Liechtenstein 's agriculture is closely linked with Switzerland through the Customs Treaty due to which the Swiss Federal Law on Agriculture is applicab le in Liechtenstein as well. Moreover, identical climate, relief, soil, topography, and structure of production, together with a common policy formulated by Switzerland for the customs union, have enhanced the similarities between the Liechtenstein and Swi ss agriculture sectors. The prices of agricultural products are broadly the same in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The reduction of the total number of farms over the last few decades (through mergers and liquidations) has led to an increase in the number of farms with a size of over 20 ha, and thus to an increase in the average size. Some 80% of the farmland is under lease. Organic agriculture has developed strongly in recent years. About 39% of all of Liechtenstein 's agricultural land is used to produce a gricultural products that meet organic standards. 40% of all professional farmers in Liechtenstein are organic farmers. Organic farming has thus become an inherent part of agriculture in Liechtenstein. There are also 10 organic -certified food processors in Liechtenstein. Staple products such as milk and vegetables compose the backbone of the organic farming movement in Liechtenstein, which began 30 years ago. Liechtenstein 's agricultural sector also plays an important role for the sustainable preservation o f the characteristic landscape of hilly and mountainous areas, which make up two thirds of Liechtenstein 's territory. Liechtenstein 's economy continues to be strongly shaped by its goods production. In 2019, the goods -producing sector provided 36.5% of all jobs. This represents a remarkably high proportion, compared to other European countries. Jobs in the goods -producing industry are provided by a total of 625 enterprises (2019). These enterprises are mainly small companies with less than 50 persons emp loyed. They are engaged in a large number of speciali zed market niches and contribute to the broad diversification of Liechtenstein 's economy. The most important branches of the industrial sector are mechanical engineering, plant construction, manufacturin g of precision instruments, dental technology, electronic control devices, vacuum, heating/lighting technology, dentistry and pharmaceutical products and food -processing industry. Financial services also constitute an important economic sector in Liechten stein. Private banking and wealth management account for a substantial part of the added value generated by the financial centre today, while the rest is generated in particular by insurers, the fund industry and independent asset managers. Globalization h as an important effect on the competitive situation of the Liechtenstein financial centre. The most important challenges include restrictions to (global) market access, the rapid technological progress, and the accelerating cycles of innovation. As an EEA Member State, Liechtenstein must implement relevant EU legislation. Accordingly, banking, insurance, securities and accounting legislation is based on the relevant EU Directives and Regulations. Moreover, Liechtenstein as an EEA Member State fully partici pates without the right to vote in the European Financial Surveillance System. In addition, the Liechtenstein 's financial institutions benefit from an EU passport granting them the unhindered access to the EU Market. The appreciation of the Swiss franc co ntinues to represent a challenge for Liechtenstein companies, in particular in the manufacturing sector, as a large and growing share of turnover is being generated abroad in foreign currencies. When the Swiss franc appreciates, the turnovers reported in f rancs drop accordingly. The same is true of profits, because most of the costs of the financial sector are incurred in Swiss francs, to the extent the parent companies are located in Liechtenstein, which leads to a worsening ratio of costs and income. The Liechtenstein financial sector, however, is facing this uncertainty with a comfortable capacity to bear risks. The average core capital (Tier 1) ratio across all banks was 22.3% in June 2021. This is far above the requirements of Basel III (8%, including s upplementary capital) and the EU average (approx. 17.2%). This is also true for the leverage ratio, which at 7.8% by the end of 2020 was significantly above the requirements of Basel III (3%). The consolidated cost/income ratio of banks in the Liechtenstei n financial centre was 71.2% in 2020. The high level of capital adequacy offers a guarantee for a stable financial center and security for banking clients. In accordance with the "Liechtenstein Declaration" of 12 March 2009, when the Liechtenstein Governme nt committed to implement global standards of transparency and exchange of tax information as developed by the OECD and to advance its participation in international efforts in order to counteract non -compliance with foreign tax laws, Liechtenstein is acti vely participating in the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes and has been assigned a rating of "Largely Compliant" in the second phase of the Global Forum 's Peer Review. Until now, Liechtenstein has conclu ded 21 Double Taxation Agreements according to the OECD Standard, concluded 27 Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEA), ratified the Multilateral WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 24 - Convention on Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters in August 2016 ("Multilateral Convention") and signe d the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information ("AEI MCAA") in 2014. As an early adopter for the implementation of the global standard on automatic exchange of information, Liechtenstein has conclude d an Agreement to Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters (AEOI) with the EU which has entered into force on 1 January 2016. As of 1 January 2022, Liechtenstein 's AEOI network comprised a total of 114 AEOI exchange partners. Liechtenstein has also joined the Inclusive Framework of the OECD to implement measures against Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) and signed the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Country -by-Country Reporting ("CBC MCAA") in 2016. After joining the OECD/G20 Inc lusive Framework on BEPS in 2016, Liechtenstein moreover abolished its IP Box regime with a grandfathering period that ended on 31 December 2020. Furthermore, Liechtenstein ratified the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI) in 2019. Today, Liechtenstein does not have any harmful tax regimes as confirmed by the annual Peer Reviews by the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP). Liechtenstein has a vital interest in the worldwide enfo rcement of internationally recognized standards to prevent abuse of the financial markets. Liechtenstein 's foreign policy therefore pays great attention to the development and international enforcement of uniform rules to prevent and combat money launderin g and the financing of terrorism. At the national level, legislative, administrative and other practical measures have been taken in the last years to achieve this goal. Liechtenstein has fully implemented the EU 's 5th Anti -Money Laundering Directive. The implementation of relevant standards in Liechtenstein has been acknowledged by international bodies. In 2021/2022, the regime in Liechtenstein on anti -money laundering (AML) and the combating of financing of terrorism (CFT) was again assessed by the Counc il of Europe Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of AML and CFT (Moneyval). An on -site visit was conducted in September 2021 in the framework of a mutual evaluation process aimed at assessing jurisdictions' technical compliance and effective implementat ion of international standards, in line with the 2013 methodology of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The report on the evaluation is scheduled for discussion and adoption at MONEYVAL 's 63rd Plenary meeting in Spring 2022. On 1 January 2020, the To ken and Trusted Technology Service Provider Act (TVTG) – also known as the "Blockchain Act." – entered into force in Liechtenstein. With this new law, Liechtenstein was the first country to introduce a comprehensive regulation of the token economy. On the one hand, the law regulates civil law issues in relation to client and asset protection. On the other hand, adequate supervision of the various service providers in the token economy has been established. In addition, there are measures to combat money lau ndering by making service providers subject to rules on anti -money laundering and the combating of financing of terrorism. Furthermore, the law provides clarity and legal certainty with regard to digital securities. There had been widespread legal uncertai nty regarding business models on blockchain systems which are not covered by financial market legislation but nonetheless involve carrying out activities that are very close to the financial sector. With the Blockchain Act, Liechtenstein now defines the mi nimum requirements for these activities in blockchain systems and requires all of them to be registered with the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority. The new law also contains a legal classification of elements on blockchain systems. The Blockchain Ac t defines the term "token" as a new construct to enable the transformation of the "real" world to blockchain systems while ensuring legal certainty, thereby opening up the full potential for application of the so -called token economy. The introduction of t he legal construct of the "token" in Liechtenstein law requires that the legal consequences – such as ownership, possession, and transfer – must also be legally defined. The applications of blockchain technology are not restricted to simple transactions o f coins or tokens with an exchangeable value between private individuals. Rather, they provide the option for a large range of economic services, as assets or rights in general can also be recorded in blockchain systems. For the financial transactions, thi s provides the possibility to create a digital recording of means of payment or assets and the possibility to conduct transactions with no direct intermediary being responsible for the execution of such transaction. The low costs for digital transactions a re likely to open up new opportunities beyond financial services in fields such as logistics, mobility, energy, industry, media, and many more. All these potential applications are grouped together under what is called the "token economy". WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 25 - Because of the r apid pace and broad scope of the development of blockchain technology and its areas of application, Liechtenstein 's Blockchain Act is formulated abstractly enough to ensure that it remains applicable for subsequent technology generations. That is why the l aw uses the term "transaction systems based on trustworthy technologies (TT systems)". As blockchain technology is actively used in Liechtenstein, the new law clarifies which requirements apply for important activities on TT systems (TT services). Customer protection is improved and the application of due diligence obligations is required in order to ensure compliance with international standards and extensive and effective fighting of money laundering. The law defines a legal framework for all applications of the token economy in order to ensure legal certainty for current and future business models. In particular, this involves rules on generating and storing tokens. For securities to be represented in a token on a TT system, and transferred therein, via a physical document without any detours, the legal concept of the book -entry securities ("Wertrecht") has been accepted in Liechtenstein legislation, and at the same time the necessary interfaces between the securities law and the Blockchain Act have been c reated. Book -entry securities are "dematerialized" securities where the functions of a certificate can be replaced by an entry into the book -entry register. State activities The Government of Liechtenstein provides neither traditional export subsidies or g uarantees, nor subsidies to companies, with the exception of the agricultural sector, which mainly consists of family -owned micro -businesses. The main features of the playing field set by the Government 's economic policy are free trade agreements, stabilit y, durability and reliability of the policy measures, maintaining a high -quality educational system, a business -friendly tax regime, low administrative burden and a lean and customer -oriented public administration. In order to further facilitate the intera ction with the public administration, the Government is currently advancing the digitali sation of most public services, for example including identification and payment services. For that purpose, a "Digitalisation Roadmap for the Liechtenstein Public Admi nistration" was developed in 2020. The Roadmap, which includes more than 100 digitalisation projects across 29 public offices, is to be implemented in the coming years. In its e -Government Act, the government has stipulated that from 2023 onwards, all comm unication between companies and public authorities must be conducted electronically. With the aim of further promoting an investor -friendly environment in accordance with relevant EEA law, the Liechtenstein tax legislation was completely revised in 2011 w hen a totally new tax act replaced the previous one dating back to 1961. Under the new tax act, legal persons taxable in Liechtenstein and engaged in economic activities are subject to a corporate income tax of 12.5%. The existing capital tax was abolished . Income and gains from participations are tax -exempt, and losses carried over are no longer subject to a time limit. In addition, a notional interest deduction has been introduced. Other important innovations include group taxation for affiliated companie s, provisions for private asset structures, the facilitation of taxation of asset management companies, or provisions on the tax treatment of national and cross -border restructurings. The Central Entrepreneur Service of the Office of Economic Affairs provi des advice related to new or expanding business projects, with a focus to start -ups, administrative management, formalities or dealing with authorities. In addition to that, there are a number of private initiatives helping young professionals and companie s in the growth phase on business planning and management, and arranging contacts with financial institutions, investors or potential business partners. To promote innovation, research and development in the industry, the Liechtenstein Government has estab lished, together with the authorities of the neighbouring Swiss Canton of St. Gallen, the "RhySearch " centre. RhySearch connects companies and research institutions and conducts high -level own research in the fields of optical coating and high -precision ma nufacturing. The Government also supports the newly founded Switzerland Innovation Park Ost which connects regional industry with research institutions, with a focus on health, mem -industry and digitalisation. The Investor Summit Liechtenstein has been con necting start -ups and MSMEs seeking capital with top -class investors and decision -makers for several years. Company presentations are at the heart of these event which are sponsored by the Liechtenstein Government as well as numerous other partners. Capita l-seeking start -ups and growth -oriented MSMEs are given the opportunity to present themselves to a high -calibre audience and make interesting contacts. Decision -makers and investors are thus given the opportunity to get to know a wide variety of interestin g investment opportunities in a very short time. WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 26 - Due to the country 's small territory and in view of the high proportion of non -Liechtenstein citizens within the total resident and working population (34% and 70%, respectively), Liechtenstein is compelled to strictly regulate cross -border employment and immigration. Compared to the last Trade Policy Review of Switzerland -Liechtenstein, the share of non -Liechtenstein citizens within the resident and working population has further increased. Therefore, the Go vernment does not see any leeway to ease restrictions concerning immigration and employment. The special rules concerning the freedom of movement of persons, granted to Liechtenstein in the EEA, remain unchanged. Furthermore, in view of Liechtenstein 's geo graphic position and size and in order to respect its rural character and preserve access to real estate for the resident population, the Government restricts investment into real estate (also for non -resident Liechtenstein citizens). Liechtenstein has est ablished a comprehensive macroprudential policy framework, with a transparent division of responsibilities among the Financial Market Authority (FMA), the Financial Stability Council (FSC) and the Government. In light of the significance of the financial c entre for the economy as a whole, macroprudential supervision and policy plays a key role in Liechtenstein. In absence of a national central bank in Liechtenstein, ensuring financial stability is legally defined as part of the FMA 's mandate. Based on the f indings of the FMA 's financial stability analyses and the subsequent discussion between the FMA and the Government, the FSC proposes and publishes macroprudential measures, recommendations and warnings. In this context, the FSC has become a well-establishe d institution in Liechtenstein. A comprehensive policy -mix composed of capital buffers as well as lender - and borrower -based measures is currently in place to improve the systemic resilience of the financial sector and to reduce the build -up of systemic ri sks. With a legislative revision in 2019, Liechtenstein has introduced an effective and transparent macroprudential capital framework for the banking sector. In light of the vulnerabilities related to the high indebtedness of private households, the policy -mix also includes various instruments to mitigate risks in the real estate sector. 2.3 Trade Policy Developments and Future Policy Directions The framework of the trade environment of Liechtenstein is determined by the Customs Treaty with Switzerland, Liecht enstein 's membership in EFTA, the EEA and the WTO. These vessels allow Liechtenstein to participate in the multilateral trading system but at the same time to join, as a complementary tool, deeper economic cooperation in regional agreements. So far Liechte nstein has not been involved in any WTO or EFTA dispute settlement case. The World Trade Organization (WTO) Liechtenstein attaches high importance to a strong, rules based Multilateral Trading System. The WTO plays a key role in ensuring non -discriminator y market access for all WTO members and as a stronghold against protectionism. At the same time the WTO system has to respond with flexibility to the realities and needs of this century 's globalized economy and to the increasingly diverse situations of its members. Improved market access means more trade, and more trade is beneficial to all, developed and developing countries alike. Furthermore, it offers opportunities for an increase in trade with and among developing countries. The multilateral trading sy stem is a proven vehicle in promoting economic development and growth and is central to the future prosperity of our nations. Both the monitoring and negotiating arms of the WTO need to be strengthened and further developed. Liechtenstein is committed to further strengthening the multilateral system. It does not perceive the various initiatives launched by groups of interested WTO member States in recent years as a threat to that system but rather as a chance to revive the neg otiating function of the WTO. For a very small member State of the WTO as Liechtenstein, the inclusiveness of such initiatives is key, however. Given that this prerequisite is guaranteed, Liechtenstein has thus joined the plurilateral Joint Statement Initi atives on Services Domestic Regulations, on E -Commerce, on MSMEs and on Trade and Gender and has been a co -sponsor of the Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions, including the Initiative on Fossil Fuels Subsidies Reform. The Europea n Economic Area (EEA) The European Single Market is the most important market for Liechtenstein 's economic operators. Due to the EEA -Agreement with its four economic freedoms, Liechtenstein has non -WT/TPR/G/ 425 • Switzerland and Liechtenstein - 27 - discriminatory access to this market. As a consequence of this agreement, a large part of Liechtenstein 's economic legislation is based on EU law. Mid 2021, Liechtenstein had implemented 99.6% of the relevant internal market rules. Liechtenstein 's legislation in the respective areas is therefore identical with Eu ropean Union law. The relationship between Liechtenstein and the EU is not limited to the EEA. Since 2011, Liechtenstein participates in the areas of Schengen and Dublin (open borders, visa, police cooperation , asylum, etc.). The association with Schengen and Dublin supplements and deepens Liechtenstein 's integration in Europe in the areas of justice and home affairs. The EEA had shown in its past that it offers a stable contractual framework for economic relations with the EU. Liechtenstein remains stron gly committed to the EEA and focuses on continuing the good cooperation between the EFTA and the EU in the EEA to protect the functioning of this common market. The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Liechtenstein became a full EFTA member on 1 Septemb er 1991. Hitherto, in light of the customs union with Switzerland, Liechtenstein had been covered by the EFTA convention through a particular Protocol. Since the early 1990s, EFTA has established an extensive network of contractual relations with States a nd Territories in Central and Eastern Europe, in the Mediterranean region and overseas. As of today, the EFTA States have a network of 29 Free Trade Agreements with a total of 40 partner countries and territories around the world. The FTAs concluded by the EFTA States aim at enhancing mutual market access and ensuring that economic operators are granted non -discriminatory treatment vis -à-vis their main competitors in these markets. Customs Union/Economic Integration with Switzerland The close cooperation wi th Switzerland is reflected in more than 100 bilateral treaties, the most important of them being the Customs Treaty and the Currency Treaty. The Customs Treaty, in combination with other agreements pertaining to the movement of persons, allowed for the ab olition of any border or customs control between the two countries. Of equal practical importance to Liechtenstein 's economy is the Currency Union Treaty which forms the legal basis for using the Swiss franc as the official currency (legal tender) in Liech tenstein. The provisions of the Customs Treaty stipulate that the Swiss laws pertaining to customs as well as other federal legislation necessary for the implementation of the customs -free zone are also applicable in Liechtenstein. In addition, trade and customs treaties concluded by Switzerland with third parties (with the exception of the EEA countries) regarding the provisions concerning trade in goods also apply to Liechtenstein on the basis of the Customs Treaty. Switzerland is authorized to represent Liechtenstein in relevant negotiations and to conclude such treaties with effect in Liechtenstein. The Customs Treaty facilitated the bilateral cooperation far beyond its originally envisaged scope of application, in particular in the areas of social welf are (health, social security), education (vocational and professional training), transport and environment. The entry into force of the revised EFTA Convention on 1 June 2002 has led to an additional integration step in the economic relations between Liech tenstein and Switzerland. Despite the difference in their integration policy towards the EU, both countries not only managed to maintain but continuously foster the already existing close links. This is owed particularly to the innovative and specific adap tations that are foreseen for Liechtenstein in the EEA -Agreement which allow for a dual marketability of goods produced in Liechtenstein, meaning that goods are certified according to rules of the respective market to which they are exported, either the EU or Switzerland. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_SPS_NECU221A1.pdf

q_G_SPS_NECU221A1

G/SPS/N/ECU/221/Add.1 19 September 2019 (19-6020) Page: 1/2 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: Spanish NOTIFICATION Addendum The following communication, received on 1 2 September 2 019, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Ecuador . _______________ Resolution No. 0115 - Procedure for the approval of foreign enterprises and their establishments wishing to export livestock products to Ecuador Resolution No. 0115 of 1 4 June 2 019 provides for the immediate entry into force of the procedure for the approval of foreign enterprises and their establishments wishing to export livestock products to Ecuador. Text available at: https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/SPS/ECU/19_5036_00_s.p df This addendum concerns a: [ ] Modification of final date for comments [X] Notification of adoption, publication or entry into force of regulation [ ] Modification of content and/or scope of previously notified draft regulation [ ] Withdrawal of proposed regulation [ ] Change in proposed date of adoption, publication, or date of entry into force [ ] Other: Comment period : (If the addendum extends the scope of the previously notified measure in terms of products and/or potentially affected Members, a new deadline for receipt of comments should be provided, normally of at least 60 calendar days . Under other circumstances, such as extension of originally announced final date for comments, the comment period provided in the addendum ma y vary.) [ ] Sixty days from the date of circulation of the addendum to the notification and/or (dd/mm/yy ): Not applicable Agency or authority designated to handle comments : [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point . Address, fax number and email address (if available) of other body: Agencia de Regulación y Control Fito y Zoosanitari o, AGROCALIDAD (Agency for Phytosanitary and Animal Health Regulation and Control) Patricio Almeida Granja Av. Interoceánica Km. 14 1/2, La Granja MAG , Tumbaco Tel.: (+593) 2 237 2844 (+593) 2 256 7232, Ext. 118 Email: direccion@agrocalidad.gob.ec relaciones.internacionales@agrocalidad.gob.ec agrocalidad.rrii@gmail.com G/SPS/N/ECU/221/Add.1 - 2 - Text(s) available from : [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point . Address, fax number and email address (if available) of other body: Agencia de Regulación y Control Fito y Zoosanitari o, AGROCALIDAD (Agency for Phytosanitary and Animal Health Regulation and Control) Patricio Almeida Granja Av. Interoceánica Km. 14 1/2, La Granja MAG, Tumbaco Tel.: (+593) 2 237 2844 (+593) 2 256 7232, Ext. 118 Email: direccion @agrocalidad.gob.ec relaciones.internacionales@agrocalidad.gob.ec agrocalidad.rrii@gmail.com __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/284347_2022_TBT_TZA_22_3181_00_e.pdf

284347_2022_TBT_TZA_22_3181_00_e

CDC 10 (443) DTZS © TBS 2022 1st Edition TANZANIA STANDARD Bamboo drinking straw — Specification TANZANIA BUREAU OF STANDARDS © TBS – All rights reserved 0 Foreword This draft Tanzania Standard was developed under the direction of Stationery and Paper Products Technical Committee under supervision of the Chemical Division Standards Committee and it is in accordance with the procedures of Tanzania Bureau of Standards. This draft Tanzania Standard is the first edition for bamboo drinking straws. It lays down the essential requirements to which such straw must conform. In the preparation of this Tanzania Standard assistance was drawn from: GS 218: Plastics - Specification for plastic drinking straw, published by Ghana Bureau of Standards CD/K/09/2018- EAS- Paper and board food contact material – Specification The assistance obtained from the above source is hereby acknowledged with thanks. In reporting the results of analysis of a test if the final value is to be rounded off, it shall be done in accordance with TZS 4, Rounding off numerical values. CDC 10 (443) DTZS © TBS – All rights reserved DRAFT TANZANIA STANDARD CDC 10 (443) DTZS Bamboo drinking straw- Specification 1 Scope This Draft Tanzania Standard specifies the requirements, methods of sampling and test for bamboo drinking straws. It applies to naturally grown bamboo species. 2 Normative references The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this Tanzania Standard. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. TZS 83: -ISO 287; Paper and board — Determination of moisture content of a lot — Oven- drying method TZS 118 /ISO 4833, Microbiology of the food chain — Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms — Colony-count technique at 30 °C TZS 125-1/ISO 6888-1 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs – Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species) – Part 1: Technique using TZS 730-1: 2020 / ISO 16649-1:2018 Colony count technique at 44 0C using membranes and 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl b-D-glucuronide ISO 4046: Paper, board, pulps and related terms- Vocabulary ISO 8784-1, Pulp, paper and board — Microbiological examination — Part 1: Total count of bacteria, yeast, mould based on disintegration ISO 13302, Sensory analysis — Methods for assessing modifications to the flavour of foodstuffs due to packaging ISO 13914, Soil quality — Determination of dioxins and furans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls by gas chromatography with high-resolution mass selective detection (GC/HRMS) 3 Terms and definitions For the purpose of this standard, the following terms and definitions shall apply. 3.1 defective pack of bamboo drinking straws that fails in one or more respects to comply with the requirements of this specification 3.2 drinking straw drinking straw is a prepared small pipe or tube used to suck a beverage out of a container. A straw may be made of a thin tube of paper, bamboo, stainless steel, plastic or other material is used by placing one end in the mouth and the other in the beverage 3.3 bamboo drinking straw drinking straw made entirely from natural bamboo plant CDC 10 (443) DTZS © TBS – All rights reserved 3.4 nominal thickness theoretical desired thickness of a bamboo drinking straw 3.7 lot aggregate of drinking straws of a single kind of specified characteristics produced under conditions that are presumed uniform and available for inspection at one time 4 Requirements 4.1 General requirements 4.1.1 The material used for the manufacturing of the bamboo drinking straws shall be from naturally grown bamboo plant. 4.1.2 Bamboo drinking straw shall not affect the organoleptic qualities of the food that it comes in contact with. 4.1.3 Bamboo drinking straw shall be free from any chemical additives and grown free from agricultural chemical residues. 4.1.4 The bamboo drinking straw shall have smooth surface, be free from surface holes, dirt, dust and off odours. 4.2 Specific requirements 4.2.1 Moisture content The moisture content of drinking straws shall be below 15%. 4.2.3 Dimensional requirements 4.2.3.1 Length 4.2.3.1.1 The length of the drinking straw shall be as agreed between the customer and the manufacturer. The tolerances on the length shall be ± 3 mm. 4.2.3.1.2 The length of long drinking straw shall be 200 to 220 mm or as agreed between the customer and the manufacturer. 4.2.3.1.3 The length of short drinking straw shall be 110 to 120 mm or as agreed between the customer and the manufacturer. 4.2.3.2 Thickness The thickness of the drinking straw shall be measured at four points using a suitable linear measuring gauge to the nearest 0.01 mm and shall be between 1 to 3 mm. The lowest of the four measurements shall not be less than 0.2 mm. 4.2.3.2.2 4.2.3.3 Outer diameter When the outside diameter of the drinking straw is determined by using a suitable gauge, it shall lie within the range of 3.0 mm – 10 mm for long and short drinking straws. CDC 10 (443) DTZS © TBS – All rights reserved 4.2.4 Microbiological examination 4.2.4.1 When the bamboo straw is tested in accordance with clause 4.2 it shall comply with microbiological limits given in table 1. Table 1 –microbiological limits S/N Characteristic Limit Test method i) Total aerobic plate count,cfu/g,max. 102 TZS 118 ii) Faecal coliforms E. colli, cfu/g Absent TZS 730 iii) Staphylococcus aureus , cfu/g Absent TZS 125 iv) Salmonella spp,per 25 g Absent TZS 125 5 Packaging and marking 5.1 Packing The drinking straws shall be packed in a suitable package that withstands normal handling and transportation. and that will prevent damage to the product. 5.2 Marking Each package shall be indelibly and legibly marked with the following information: a) name and physical address or registered trademark of the manufacturer; b) batch code; c) name of product; d) country of origin, e) size of the straw, f) name of all additives and processing aids used. g) instruction of use h) number of straws per pack 6 Sampling 6.1 Scale of sampling 6.1.1 Tests for determining the conformity of a lot to the requirements of the specification shall be done on each lot separately. The number of package shall be selected at random and shall be in accordance with table 1. 6.1.2 From each outer package (see 6.1.1) select at random the number of the straws in accordance with table 2. Table 2 – Scale of sampling Number of package in the lot Number of package to be selected Number of straws to be selected Up to 10 1 10 11 to 50 2 15 More than 50 3 20 CDC 10 (443) DTZS © TBS – All rights reserved

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_COMTD_PTAM7.pdf

q_WT_COMTD_PTAM7

RESTRICTED WT/COMTD/PTA/M/7 29 November 2021 (21-8976) Page: 1/2 Committee on Trade and Development Seventh Dedicated Session on Preferential Trade Arrangements NOTE ON THE MEETING OF 10 NOVEMBER 2021 Chairman: H.E. Dr Muhammad Mujtaba Piracha (Pakistan) A. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ................................ ................................ .................... 1 B. STATUS OF THE WORK OF THE DEDICATED SESSION ................................ .............. 1 (I) Status of the preparation of factual presentations – Report by the Chairman (WT/COMTD/PTA/W/5) ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 1 C. CONSIDERATION OF PREFERENTIAL TRADE ARRANGEMENTS ................................ . 2 (I) Thailand – Duty-free and quota -free scheme for least developed countries (WT/COMTD/PTA5/N/1, WT/COMTD/PTA5/1, WT/COMTD/PTA5/2) ................................ ............ 2 D. OTHER BUSINESS ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 2 A. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1. The draft agenda as contained in Airgram WTO/AIR/COMTD/PTA/ 6/Rev.1 of 29 October 2021 was adopted . B. STATUS OF THE WORK OF THE DEDICATED SESSION (I) Status of the preparation of factual presentations – Report by the Chairman (WT/COMTD/PTA/W/ 5) 2. The Chairman said that his report on the status of the preparation of factual presentations of preferential trade arrangements ( PTAs) was contained in document WT/COMTD/PTA/W/ 5. The report indicated that the Secretariat had received the required data from the United Kingdom regarding its Generalized System of Preferences scheme , and would therefore shortly begin the preparation of the factual presentation on this PTA. However, there were a number of other PTAs that ha d been notified since the establishment of the Transparency Mechanism for PTAs, for which the Secretariat had still not received the full set of data or information required for the preparation of the factual presentations. He therefore urge d the notifying Member s to provide all the required data and information as soon as possible. He also shared his understanding that China had recently submitted several years of import data to the Secretariat, in particular for the years 2010 to 2015, as well as for 2017. Altho ugh the Secretariat was not able to integrate this data into the Integrated Database (IDB) , he nevertheless express ed his appreciation to China, and encourage d continued close collaboration with the Secretariat so that the required data could eventually be submitted. 3. The representative of China thanked the Chairman for providing update s regarding the data submitted by China, and indicated that she wished to provide further clarifications on China's notification status. She said that her delegation had submitted import data for the years 2010 to 2018. The d ata for 2016 and 2018 was valid according to the Secretariat, while data for the other years was invalid due to some data discrepancies with the IDB. She noted that , in the context of China's data, the Chairman's report stated that import data was received for 2016 and 2018, while data for other years was still outstanding. She believed that this did not reflect the true status , and could be misleading. The Secretariat was therefore encour aged to revise the language on China 's WT/COMTD/PTA/M/7 - 2 - notification status and provide feedback in due course. China was trying to resolve the data discrepancies , and would submit the updated data when ready. 4. The Chairman invited a representative o f the Secretariat (Economic Research and Statistics Division) to respond to the points made by China. 5. The representative of the Secretariat said that note had been taken of China's request . The Secretariat would be in touch with the delegation of China to see how the request could be accommodated for the next report. 6. The Chairman encouraged the Secretariat and the delegation of China to work closely together and resolve any outstanding issues. 7. The representative of the United States thanked the Chairman for his report, which her delegation found very useful. She welcome d the Chairman's remarks and interest in the transparency exercise. Her delegation urged all Members that had not yet notified their PTAs to do so promptly. Her delegation also urged notifying Members, and those that had not yet done so, to provide the Secretariat with the required data and information as soon as possible. 8. The Committee took note of the Chairman 's report, and of the interventions. C. CONSIDERATION OF PREFERENTIAL TRADE ARRANGEMENTS (I) Thailand – Duty-free and quota -free scheme for least developed countries (WT/COMTD/PTA 5/N/1, WT/COMTD/PTA5/1, WT/COMTD/PTA5/2 )1 D. OTHER BUSINESS 9. No matter was raised under "Other Business". 10. The meeting was adjourned . __________ 1 The minutes relating to the consideration of this PTA are contained in document WT/COMTD/PTA5 /M/1.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A140S1.pdf

s_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A140S1

WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/Add. 140/Supp l.1 14 de febrero de 2022 (22-1339) Página: 1/1 Comité de Comercio y Desarrollo Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN DE LOS CAMBIOS QUE AFECTAN LA APLICACIÓN DE UN ACUERDO COMERCIAL REGIONAL Suplemento AAP.A25TM 23.1 (Art. 25 del TM80)1 1 Miembro(s) que notifica(n): Venezuela y Guatemala 2 Fecha de la notificación: 11 de marzo de 1996 3 Notificación hecha en virtud del: [ X ] párrafo 14 del Mecanismo de Transparencia para los Acuerdos Comerciales Regionales (WT/L/671) 4 Los cambios afectan a: [ X ] las mercancías [ ] los servicios [ ] ambos 5 ACR inicial que se modifica: TM80 6 Referencia del documento de la OMC correspondiente a la notificación inicial del ACR: L/5342 - WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1 - WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/ Add.140 7 Partes en el Acuerdo: Venezuela y Guatemala 8 Fecha de adopción: 14 de octubre de 1992 9 Fecha(s) de entrada en vigor /aplicación provisional: A confirmar 10 Breve descripción de los cambios: AAP.A25TM 23.1 (Artículos 25 del TM80) El Protocolo Adicional Nº 1 al Acuerdo de Alcance Parcial Nº 23 (AAP.A25TM 23.1) incorpora nuevas preferencias al Acuerdo. 11 El texto y las listas, anexos y protocolos conexos: ( ) Se envían a la Secretaría de la OMC (formato electrónico). ( X ) Se pueden consultar en los siguientes enlaces oficiales de Internet: https://www2.aladi.org/nsf aladi/textacdos.nsf/f648ed517f865e1883257d800057e111/762 ef139ee013a640325682500444263?OpenDocument 1 El Artículo 25 del TM80 establece que "… los países miembros podrán concertar acuerdos de alcance parcial con otros países y áreas de integración de América Latina… ".

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN09_ISR379A3.pdf

s_G_TBTN09_ISR379A3

G/TBT/N/ISR/379/Add.3 12 de noviembre de 2021 (21-8576) Página: 1/1 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 11 de noviembre de 2021 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación de Israel . _______________ Título : Leche cruda de vaca Motivo del addendum : [ ] Modificación del plazo para presentar observaciones - fecha: [ ] Adopción de la medida notificada - fecha: [ ] Publicación de la medida notificada - fecha: [ ] Entrada en vigor de la medida notificada - fecha: [ ] Indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva1: [X] Retiro o derogación de la medida notificada - fecha : 5 de octubre de 2021 Signatura pertinente, en el caso de que se vuelva a notificar la medida: [ ] Modificación del contenido o del ámbito de aplicación de la medida notificada e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: Nuevo plazo para presentar observaciones (si procede): [ ] Publicación de documentos interpretativos e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: [ ] Otro motivo: Descripción : Se revoca el tercer proceso de modificación de la Norma obligatoria de Israel SI 55, notificada en el documento G/TBT/N/ISR/379 y sus adiciones (notificado inicialmente el 18 de diciembre de 2009 ). __________ 1 Entre otras cosas, puede aportarse la dirección de un sitio web, un anexo en pdf u otra información que indique dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva/modificada y/o documentos interpretativos.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/284868_2022_TBT_UGA_22_3680_00_e.pdf

284868_2022_TBT_UGA_22_3680_00_e

DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD DUS 2551 First Edition 2021 -mm-dd Reference number DUS 2551 : 2021 © UNBS 2021 Barkcloth — Specification DUS 2551 : 2021 ii © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved Compliance with this standard does not, of itself confer immunity from legal obligations A Uganda Standard does not purport to include all necessary provisions of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application © UNBS 2021 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without prior written permission from UNBS. Requests for permission to reproduce this document should be addressed to The Executive Director Uganda National Bureau of Standards P.O. Box 6329 Kampala Uganda Tel: +256 41 4 333 2 50/1/2/3 Fax: +256 41 4 286 123 E-mail: info@unbs.go.ug Web: www.unbs.go.ug DUS 2551 :2021 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved iii Contents Page Foreword ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ iv 1 Scope ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 1 2 Normative references ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 1 3 Terms and definitions ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 1 4 Application ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 2 5 Requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 2 5.1 General requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 2 5.2 Specific requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 2 6 Dimensions/sizes/shapes ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 2 7 Grain/textural aesthetic and shades ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 2 8 Packaging ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 3 9 Labelling ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 3 9.1 Labelling on each bark cloth ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 3 9.2 Labelling on bulk package ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 3 10 Sampling ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 3 Annex A (informative) Test method for porosity ................................ ................................ ............................ 5 A.1 Principle ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 5 A.2 Test pieces ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 5 A.3 Procedure ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 5 A.4 Calculation ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 5 Bibliography ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 6 DUS 2551 : 2021 iv © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved Foreword Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) is a parastatal under the Ministry of Trade , Industry and Cooperatives established under Cap 327 , of the Laws of Uganda , as amended . UNBS is mandated to co - ordinate the elaboration of standards and is (a) a member of International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and (b) a contact point for the WHO/FAO Codex Alimentarius Commission on Food Standards, and (c) the National Enquiry Point on TBT Agreement of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The work of preparing Uganda Standards is carried out through Technical Committees. A Technical Committee is established to deliberate on standards in a given field or area and consists of key stakeholders including government, academia, consumer groups, private sector and other interested parties. Draft Uganda Standards adopted by the Technical Committee are widely circulated to stakeholders and the general public for comments. The committee reviews the comments before recommending the draft standards for approval and declaration as Uganda Standards by the National Standards Council. The committee responsible for this document is Technical Committee UNBS /TC 311, [Crafts and related products ]. DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD DUS 2551 : 2021 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved 1 Barkcloth — Specification 1 Scope This Draft Uganda Standard specifies requirements, sampling and test methods for bark cloth produced from the wild fig or mutuba tree (Ficus natalensis) 2 Normative references The following referenced documents referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. US ISO 105 -X12, Textiles - Tests for colour fastness - Part X12: Colour fastness to rubbing US ISO 3801 , Textiles - Woven fabrics - Determination of mass per unit length and mass per unit area ISO 5084 , Textiles — Determination of thickness of textiles and textile products US ISO 12947 -2, Textiles — Determination of the abrasion resistance of fabrics by the martindale method — Part 2: Determination of specimen breakdown US ISO 13934 -1, Textiles - Tensile properties of fabrics - Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method US ISO 13934 -1, Textiles — Tensile properties of fabrics — part 1: determination of maximum force and elongation at m aximum force using the strip method ISO 16373 -2, Textiles — Dyestuffs — Part 2: General method for the determination of extractable dyestuffs including allergenic and carcinogenic dyestuffs (method using pyridine -water) ISO 16373 -3, Textiles — Dyestuffs — Part 3: Method for determination of certain carcinogenic dyestuffs (method using triethylamine/methanol) US ISO 22198 , Textiles - Fabrics - Determination of width and length 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms an d definitions apply. ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses: — ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp 3.1 Barkcloth a hard non-woven cloth , fibrous textile that is p roduced from the wild fig or mutuba tree (Ficus natalensis) 2 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved 4 Application Fabric for clothing, fashion, accessories, home furnishings, Interior designing, car consoles, furniture finishes, book covers, canvases for fine art and design , purses, Tablemats, f loor mats etc. 5 Requirements 5.1 General requirements 5.1.1 Any holes or tears in the barkclo th shall be stitched with a natural fibre, for example, raffia . Stitches if used shall present a regular even appearance and shall be free from skips. 5.1.2 Barkc loth shall be free from any defects such as spots and stains 5.1.3 The edges of the finished barkcloth shall have a neat finishing. 5.2 Specific requirements 5.2.1 Barkcloth shall conform to the specific requirements in Table 1 when tested in accordance wi th the test methods prescribed therein Table 1 ─ Specific requi rements for barkcloth S/N Parameter Requirement Test methods 1 Mass per unit Area , g/m2 90–380 US ISO 3801 2 Thickness, mm 0.30–3.50 ISO 508 4 3 Porosity/ pore volume,% 65.9 – 80.1 Annex A 4 Dry rubbing c olour fastness , min 3 US ISO 105 -X12 5 Wet rubbing colour fastness, min 2 US ISO 105 -X12 6 Abrasion resistance, rubs 700 – 13900 US ISO 12947 -2 7 Tensile strength , N Up to 114.66 US ISO 13934 -1 5.2.2 Where colora nts have been applied on the ba rkcloth , the dyed barkcloth shall not contain dyestuffs specified in ISO 16373 -2 and ISO 16373 -3 6 Dimensions/sizes/shapes The sizes , shapes , and dimensions of the barkcloth shall be as agreed between the manufacturer/supplier and the buyer , if dimensions are declared, they shall not be less than that indicated on the identification label when tested in accordance with US ISO 22198. A tolerance of ±5 percent shall be permitted 7 Grain/textural aesthetic and shades Grain/ textural aesthetic and shades shall be as agreed between the producer /supplier and the buyer . DUS 2551: 2021 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved 3 8 Packaging The barkcloth shall be suitably packed individ ually or in bulk, to avoid damage during handling, storage and transportation 9 Labelling 9.1 Labelling on each bark cloth Each barkcloth s hall be le gibly and indelibly labelled with the following information: a) name of the product as, “barkcloth”; b) manufacturer’s name, trademark or any other identification mark; c) size or dimensions; d) care instructions; and e) country of origin. 9.2 Labelling on b ulk package The follo wing infor mation shall be labelled on each bulk package: a) name of the product as, “barkcloth ”; b) manufacturer’s name, trademark or any other identification mark; c) number of pieces in the bulk package; d) gross weight ; and e) country of or igin. 10 Sampling 10.1 All the barkcloth of the same species, size and from the same manufacturer shall constitute a lot. 10.2 The barkcloth shall be selected at random from the lot. 10.3 Sample size sha ll be in accordance with Table 2 Table 2 — Scale of sampling for conformity for Barkcloth Lot size Sample size 0 Up to 10 2 11 ─20 3 21 ─30 4 31 ─40 5 41 ─ Above 6 4 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved DUS 2551: 2021 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved 5 Annex A (informative) Test method for porosity A.1 Principle Porosity of barkcloth is indicated by the amount of water absorbed Water absorption of the sample is determined by the amount of water absorbed by boiling the sample in distilled water and finding the increase in the mass A.2 Test pieces Five test pieces from the same test piece shall be cut to get a surface area of about 16 cm2.The test samples shall be freshly cut A.3 Procedure A.3.1 Dry the test pieces to a con stant weight at a temperature between 110˚C and 150˚C and then cool to room temperature in a desiccator. A.3.2 Weigh the pieces to an accuracy of not less than 0.01g and place in a vessel from which the air can be removed maintaining the pressure at less than 3cm of mercury for one hour. A.3.3 Admit cold freshly boiled distilled water to the vessel without reducing the vacuum until the pieces are covered. A.3.4 Then, admit air to the vessel without removing the pieces boil the pieces in distilled water f or not less than 20 min. Cool, wipe the pieces with a damp soft cotton cloth to remove adhering surface water and weigh quickly A.4 Calculation Water absorption of the test pieces shall be calculated as follows: Where: 𝑊1 weight of the dry test piece, and 𝑊2 weight of the test piece after treatment All the pieces shall show a water absorption as specified in Table 1 6 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved Bibliography [1] IS 15868 :2008 , Natural fibre geotextiles (jute geotextile an d coir bhoova stra) method s of test [2] Material description and p roduct s pecifications: BarkCloth DUS 2551: 2021 © UNBS 2021 – All rights reserved 7 Certification marking Products that conform to Uganda standards may be marked with Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) Certification Mark shown in the figure below. The use of the UNBS Certification Mark is governed by the Standards Act, and the Regulations made thereunder. This mark can be used only by those licensed under the certification mark scheme operated by the Uganda National Bureau of Standards and in conjunction wi th the relevant Uganda Standard. The presence of this mark on a product or in relation to a product is an assurance that the goods comply with the requirements of that standard under a system of supervision, control and testing in accordance with the certification mark scheme of the Uganda National Bureau of Standards. UNBS marked products are continually checked by UNBS for conformity to that standard. Further particulars of the terms and conditions of licensing may be obtained from the Director, Uganda National Bureau of Standards. DUS 2551: 2021 ICS nn.nnn.nn Price based on nn pages © UNBS yyyy– All rights reserved

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NMAR96A1.pdf

s_G_SPS_NMAR96A1

G/SPS/N/MAR/96/Add.1 2 de agosto de 2023 (23-5247) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: francés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, recibida el 31 de julio de 2023 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación de Marruecos . _______________ Arrêté du ministre de l'agriculture, de la pêche maritime, du développement rural et des eaux et forêts n°2140 -22 du 04 moharrem 1444 (02 août 2022) portant homologation du règlement technique relatif à la production, au contrôle, au conditionnement et à l a certification des plants d'arganier (Orden Nº 2140 -22 del Ministro de Agricultura, Pesca Marítima, Desarrollo Rural, Aguas y Bosques, de 4 de moharrem de 1444 (2 de agosto de 2022 ) sobre la homologación del Reglamento técnico relativo a la producción, el control, el envasado y la certificación de las plantas de erguén) Adopción del proyecto de Orden del Ministro de Agricultura, Pesca Marítima, Desarrollo Rural, Aguas y Bosques sobre la homologación del Reglamento técnico relativo a la producción, el control, el envasado y la certificación de las plantas de erguén. https://www.onssa.gov.ma/wp -content/uploads/2023/03/ARR.2140 -22.FR_.pdf https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/SPS/MAR/23_11409_00_f.pdf Este addendum se refiere a: [ ] la modificación de la fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones [X] la notificación de la adopción, public ación o entrada en vigor del reglamento [ ] la modificación del contenido y/o ámbito de aplicación de un proyecto de reglamento previamente notificado [ ] el retiro del reglamento propuesto [ ] la modificación de la fecha propuesta de adopción, publicac ión o entrada en vigor [ ] otro aspecto: Plazo para la presentación de observaciones : (Si el addendum amplía el ámbito de aplicación de la medida anteriormente notificada en cuanto a los productos abarcados y/o los Miembros a los que puede afectar, deberá preverse un nuevo plazo para recibir observaciones, normalmente de 60 días naturales como mínimo . En otros casos, como el aplazamiento de la fecha límite anunciada inicialmente para la presentación de observaciones, el plazo previsto en el addendum podrá variar.) [ ] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución del addendum a la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : No procede. G/SPS/N/MAR/96/Add.1 - 2 - Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de in formación . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Division de la Normalisation et des Questions SPS (División de Normalización y de Cuestiones sobre MSF) Direction de l'Évaluation des Risques et des Af faires Juridiques (Dirección de Evaluación de Riesgos y Asuntos Jurídicos) Office National de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits Alimentaires (Oficina Nacional de Inocuidad Alimentaria) Avenue Hadj Ahmed Cherkaoui Teléfono : +(212) 5 3767 6511 / 13 ; teléfono m óvil: +(212) 6 73 99 7817 Fax: +(212) 5 3768 2049 Correo electrónico: enquirypoint.spsmar@onssa.gov.ma Sitio web: www.onssa.gov.ma Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Division de la Normalisation et des Questions SPS (División de Normalización y de Cuestiones sobre MSF) Direction de l'Évaluation des Risques et des Affaires Juridiques (Dirección de Eval uación de Riesgos y Asuntos Jurídicos) Office National de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits Alimentaires (Oficina Nacional de Inocuidad Alimentaria) Avenue Hadj Ahmed Cherkaoui Teléfono : +(212) 5 3767 6511 / 13 ; teléfono móvil : +(212) 6 73 99 7817 Fax: +(212) 5 3768 2049 Correo electrónico: enquirypoint.spsmar@onssa.gov.ma Sitio web: www.onssa.gov.m a __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NIND275.pdf

r_G_SPS_NIND275

G/SPS/N/IND/275 13 janvier 2022 (22-0298) Page: 1/2 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION 1. Membre notifiant : INDE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés: 2. Organisme responsable : Food Safety and Standards Authority of India - FSSAI (Autorité de la sécurité sanitaire des produits alimentaires et des normes alimentaires de l'Inde). 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figurant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC . Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Denrées alimentaires 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable: [X] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [ ] Régions ou pays spécifiques: 5. Intitulé du texte notifié : Draft Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Amendment Regulations, 2021 (Projet de Règlement modificatif de 2018 concernant la sécurité sanitaire des produits alimentaires et les normes alimentair es (Normes alimentaires et additifs alimentaires)) . Langue(s) : anglais . Nombre de pages : 38 6. Teneur : Projet de Règlement modificatif de 2021 concernant la sécurité sanitaire des produits alimentaires et les normes alimentaires (Normes alimentaires et ad ditifs alimentaires) portant sur la liste des micro -organismes de type enzymes génétiquement modifiés pouvant être utilisés comme auxiliaire de fabrication. 7. Objectif et raison d'être : [X] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [ ] santé des animaux, [ ] préservation des végétaux, [ ] protection des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [ ] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à de s parasites. 8. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente ? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle: [ ] Commission du Codex Alimentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : [ ] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE) (par exemple, numéro de chapitre du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux aquatiques) : [ ] Convention internationale pour la protection des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP) : [X] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme internationale pertinente? G/SPS/N/IND/275 - 2 - [ ] Oui [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internationale: 9. Autres documents pertinents et langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: https://www.fssai.gov.in/notifications.php?notification=wto -sps- notification 10. Date projetée pour l'adoption (jj/mm/aa) : à déterminer Date projetée pour la publication (jj/mm/aa) : 11. Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : [ ] Six mois à compter de la date de publication, et/ou (jj/mm/aa) : Entrée en vigueur à la date de publication au Journal officiel [ ] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : [X] Soixante jours à compter de la date de distribution de la notification et/ou ( jj/mm/aa ): 14 mars 2022 Organisme ou autorité désigné pour traiter les observations : [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Mr. P. K arthikeyan Deputy Director SPS Enquiry Point, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) FDA Bhawan, Kotla Road New Delhi - 110002 (Inde) Téléphone : +(011) 2323 1681 Fax: +(011) 2322 0994 Courrier électronique : spstbt.enqpt@fssai.gov.in Site Web: http://www.fssai.gov.in/ 13. Texte(s) disponible(s) auprès de : [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Site Web de l'Autorité de la sécurité sanitaire des produits alimentaires et des norme s alimentaires de l'Inde, http://www.fssai.gov.in Mr. P. K arthikeyan Deputy Director SPS Enquiry Point, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) FDA Bhawan, Kotla Road New Delhi - 110002 (In de) Téléphone : +(011) 2323 1681 Fax: +(011) 2322 0994 Courrier électronique : spstbt.enqpt@fssai.gov.in Site Web: http://www.fssai.gov.in/

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A72S1.pdf

q_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A72S1

WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/Add.72/Suppl.1 15 February 2022 (22-1378) Page: 1/1 Committee on Trade and Development Original: Spanish NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES AFFECTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENT Supplement AAR.AM 2.1 in favour of Ecuador (Articles 6 and 18 of the TM80) 1. Member(s) notifying: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela 2. Date of notification: 24 March 1987 3. Notification pursuant to: [ X ] Paragraph 14 of the Transparency Mechanism for Regional Trade Agreements (WT/L/671) 4. Changes affect : [ X ] goods [ ] services [ ] both 5. Original RTA being modified: TM80 6. WTO document reference of original notification of RTA: L/5342 – WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1 – WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/Add.72 7. Parties to the Agreement: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela. 8. Date of adoption: 14 September 1984 9. Date(s) of entry into force/provisional application: 14 September 1984 10. Brief description of changes: AAR.AM 2.1 (Articles 6 and 18 of the TM80) Additional Protocol No. 1 to Regional Market Opening Agreement No. 2 in favour of Ecuador (AAR.AM 2.1) expands the market -opening list granted to Ecuador. 11. Text and related schedules, annexes and protocols are: [ ] submitted to the WTO Secretariat (electronic format) [ X ] available from the following official Internet link(s): https://www2.aladi.or g/nsfaladi/textacdos.nsf/f6af0344a7ec0e5303257cdf0060a8f5/3d3b6 d8e378d3a6103256d03004bc251?OpenDocument

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_SPS_NTPKM581A1.pdf

q_G_SPS_NTPKM581A1

G/SPS/N/TPKM/581/Add.1 11 July 2022 (22-5290) Page: 1/2 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English NOTIFICATION Addendum The following communication, received on 8 July 2022, is being circulated at the request of the Delegation of The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu . _______________ Imported livestock and poultry meat products used as food shall be accompanied with official health certificate issued by the competent authority of the exporting country Imported livestock and poultry meat products shall be accompanied with official health certificate issued by the competent authority of the exporting country. https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2022/SPS/TPKM/22_4587_00_x.pdf This addendum c oncerns a: [ ] Modification of final date for comments [X] Notification of adoption, publication or entry into force of regulation [ ] Modification of content and/or scope of previously notified draft regulation [ ] Withdrawal of proposed regulation [ ] Change in proposed date of adoption, publication or date of entry into force [ ] Other: Comment period: (If the addendum extends the scope of the previously notified measure in terms of products and/or potentially affected Members, a new deadline for receipt of comments should be provided, normally of at least 60 calendar days. Under other circumstances, such as extension of originally announced final date for comments, the comment period provided in the addendum may vary.) [ ] Sixty days from the date of circulation of the addendum to the notification and/or (dd/mm/yy) : Not applicable Agency or authority designated to handle comments: [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e-mail address (if available) of other body: Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, Council of Agriculture 9F, No. 100, Sec. 2, Heping W. Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., 10060, Taipei City, Taiwan Tel: +(886) 2 3343 2091 Fax: +(886) 2 2332 22 00 E-mail: wtosps@mail.baphiq.gov.tw Website: http://www.baphiq.gov.tw G/SPS/N/TPKM/581/Add.1 - 2 - Text(s) available from: [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail address (if available) of other body: Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, Council of Agriculture 9F, No. 100, Sec. 2, Heping W. Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., 10060, Taipei City, Taiwan Tel: + (886) 2 3343 2091 Fax: +(886) 2 2332 2200 E-mail: wtosps@mail.baphiq.gov.tw Website: http://www.baphiq.gov.tw __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/269474_2020_TBT_YEM_20_7691_00_x.pdf

269474_2020_TBT_YEM_20_7691_00_x

هيئة التقييس لدول مجلس التعاون لدول الخليج العربية GCC STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION (GSO) مشروع إعداد لائحة..... ..… Draft of Standard FDS TC05اعداد اللجنة الخليجية رقم Prepared by GSO Technical Committee No. TC05 GSO 654/ 2020 الاشتراطات العامة للأغذية المعبأة ذات الاستخدامات التغذوية الخاصة General Requirements for prepackaged foods for special dietary use ICS: 67.040.00 هذه الوثيقة مشروع لمواصفة قياسية خليجية تم توزيعها لإبداء الرأي والملحوظات بشأنها ، لذلك فإنها عرضة للتغيير والتبديل، ولا يجوز الرجوع إليها كمواصفة قياسية خليجية إلا بعد اعتمادها من الهيئة. This document is a draft GSO Standard circulated for comments. It is, therefore, subject to alteration and modification and may not be referred to as a GSO Standard until approved by GSO. تقديم هيئة التقييس لدول مجلس التعاون لدول الخليج العربية هيئة إقليمية تضمممم في عضمممما تجا ة ج التقييس الاطنية في الدول الأعضمما ومن مجام الجيئة إعداد المااصممتا القياسممية واللاائح التنية الخليجية بااسطة لجان فنية متخصصة. قرر (المجلس التني لـ/مجلس إدار ) هيئة التقييس لدول مجلس التعاون لدول الخليج العربية في ا تماعه رق ( ) الذي عقد بتار خ / / هـ الماافق / / م اعتماد المااصتة القياسية الخليجية رق (GSO…./…. ) باللغة العربيةوالتي ت دراستجا وإعدادها ضمن برنامج عمل اللجنة التنية الخليجية رق TC05 " اللجنة التنية الخليجية للمااصتا الغذائية وال راعية" المدر ة في خطة المملكة العربية السعاد ة. تلغي اللائحة التنية الخليجية رق GSO 654 و تحل محلجا. المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 1 الاشتراطات العامة للأغذية المعبأة ذاتالاستخدامات التغذوية الخاصة 1 . المجال 1.1 تختص هذه المااصتة الخليجية بالأغذ ة المعبأ ذا الاستخداما التغذو ة الخاصة و التي تشمل على سبيل المثال لا للحصر: 1.1.1 الأغذ ة المستعملة لأغراض طبية خاصة. 2.1.1 و با الأغذ ة المستخدمة للتحك في الازن. 3.1.1 الأغذ ة الخالية من الجلاتين. 4.1.1 المكم الغذائية. 5.1.1 ةغذ ة الرضع وصغارالأطتال. 6.1.1 حليب الرضع وحليب المتابعة والحليب المخصص للاستخدام الطبي الخاص. 2 . المراجع التكميلية 1.2 GSO 9 "بطاقا المااد الغذائية المعبأ 2.2 GSO 2333 " اشتراطا الأغذ ة ذا الادعا ا التغذو ة والصحية 3.2 GSO 382" الحدود القصاى لمتبقيا بجا لبقا ا مبيدا الآفا في المنتجا ال راعية والغذائية". 4.2 GSO 1016 "الحدود المكروبيالا ية للمااد والسلع الغذائية- الج الأول". 5.2 GSO 193 "مااصتةعامة للملاثا والسمام في الأغذ ة و الاعلاف ". 6.2 GSO 995 "المحليا المسماح باستخدامجا في المااد الغذائية 7.2 GSO 2500 "المااد المضافة المسماح بجا في المنتجا الغذائية 8.2 GSO 150-1"فترا صلاحية المنتجا الغذائية الإل امية- الج الأول". 9.2 GSO 2481 "الحدود القصاى المسماح بجا من بقا ا الأدو ة البيطر ة في الأغذ ة 10.2 GSO 2055 -1 "الأغذ ة الحلال- الج الأول: الاشتراطا العامة". المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 2 11.2 GSO 988 "حدود المستا ا الإشعاعية المسماح بجا في المااد الغذائية - الج الأول". 12.2 GSO 1694 "القااعد العامة لصحة الغذا 13.2 GSO 2483 "الدهان المجدر ة ئيا". 14.2 GSO 5002 "ةغذ ة الرضع وصغار الأطتال" 15.2 GSO 5003 "حليب الرضع وحليب المتابعة والحليب المخصص للاستخدام الطبي الخاص" 16.2 GSO 2538" الحدود القصاى لمتبقيا الكحال الإ ثيلي (الإ ثانال) في الأغذ ة" 17.2 GSO 839 " عباا المااد الغذائية– الج الأول – الاشتراطا العامة". 18.2 GSO 1863 "عباا المااد الغذائية الج الثاني: العباا البلاستيكية- اشتراطا عامة". 3 . التعاريف 1.3 الأغذ ة ذا الاستخداما التغذو ة الخاصة هي الأغذ ة المجج ةو المستحضر خصيصا للافا بمتطلبا تغذو ة خاصة مردها ةوضاع بدنية ةو فسيالا ية معينة و/او اضطرابا محدد . - جب ةن كان تركيب هذه المااد الغذائية مختلتا كثيرا عن تركيب الأغذ ة العاد ة ذا الطابع المشابه ةو و د مثل هذه الأغذ ة العاد ة. - و شمل هذا على سبيل المثال لا الحصر ةغذ ة الرضع وصغار الاطتال والاغذ ة التكميلية والاغذ ة ذا الاستخداما الطبية الخاصة وبدائل الاغذ ة الكلية المخصصة للسيطر على الازن او تختيته ولعلاج السمنة 2.3 المكملا الغذائية المنتجا التي تستخدم لاستكمال النظام الغذائي العادي والتي ت تناولجا عن طر ق الت والمخصصة لتع عنصر غذائي معين ةو عد عناصر في النظام الغذائي ةو لتأثيراتجا الغذائية ةو التيسيالا ية غير العلا ية وغالبا تكان مرك وتؤخذ بكميا قياس قليلة. المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 3 3.3 الجلاتين: عرف على انه من بروتين القمح الجاودار الشعير الشافان او هجين هذه الأنااع ومشتقاتجا وُتكان حساسية لبعض الأشخاص وغير قابلة للذوبان في الما و0.5 مال من كلار د الصاد ام. 4.3 التركيبا الغذائية المستخدمة في الا با المنختضة دا في الطاقة: تركيبا غذائية تحتاي على سعرا حرار ة قليلة دا ومحضر بشكل خاص حتى ت ود الجس بالحد الأدنى من الكرباهيدرا والاحتيا ا اليامية من العناصر الأساسية بحيث تكان الطاقة بحدود 800-450 سعر حراري وتكان المصدر الاحيد للطاقة المطلابة للجس . 5.3 اغذ ة المستعلمة لأغراض طبية خاصة: مجماعة من الأغذ ة صنعت من ة ل الاستخداما التغذو ة الخاصة والتي تجج ةو تستحضر بصار خاصة للاستخدام التغذوي للمرضى ولا جاز استخدامجا إلا تحت إشراف طبي والغرض منجا ها تافير التغذ ة الكاملة ةو الج ئية للمرضى من ذوي القدرا المحدود ةو المعدومة على تناول المااد الغذائية العاد ة ةو هضمجا ةو امتصاصجا ةو تمثيلجا ةو بعض المغذ ا التي تحتا جا ةو المرضى الذ ن لد ج احتيا ا خاصة محدد طبيا لعناصر غذائية ولا مكن الحصال عليجا إلا من خلال تعد ل النظام الغذائي العادي ةو الأغذ ة ذا الاستخداما التغذو ة الخاصة ةو بتاليتة من الاثنين. 6.3 حليب الرضع وحليب المتابعة والحليب المخصص للاستخدام الطبي الخاص: حليب الرضع: الأغذ ة الحليبية البد لة لحليب الأم والمصنعة خصيصا ا للرضع في السنة الاولى لتلبية كافة الاحتيا ا الغذائية الخاصة بالرضع مكملي فتر الحمل خلال الستة ةشجر الأولى من حياتج ومع التغذ ة التكميلية المناسبة حت عمر 12 شجرا حليب المتابعة: ةغذ ة محضر ةساسا من الحليب ومخصصة للاستعمال ةثنا مرحلة التطام للرضع من عمر 6 ةشجر وحتى12 شجر الحليب المخصص للاستخداما الطبية الخاصة: قصد بجا المنتجا المخصصة للرضع ذوي الاحتيا ا التغذو ة والطبية الخاصة. الرضع مصطلح: طلق عل الأطتال الذ ن لا تجاوز ةعماره 12 شجرا المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 4 الأطتال الصغار الأطتال الذ ن ت د ةعماره على 12 شجرا حتى36 شجرا(ثلاث سناا ). 7.3 و با الأغذ ة المستخدمة للتحك فيالازن: ةغذ ة عند عرضجا كجاه للاستعمال ةو عند تججي ها طبق ا لإرشادا الاستعمال تحل محل إ مالي الغذا اليامي ةو منه. 4 . المتطلبات العامة مع عدم الاخلال بما نصت عليه اللاائح التنية والمااصتا القياسية الخاصة بالمنتجا ذا الاستخداما التغذو ة الخاصة ر ى الالت ام بما لي: 1.4 ةلا تاصف الأغذ ة ذا الاستعمالا التغذو ة الخاصة ةو تقدم بطر قة تتس بال ف ةو التضليل ةو الخداع ةو ر ح ةن تعطي انطباعا خاطئا بشأن خصائصجا من ة ة ناحية من النااحي. 2.4 ةلا ت د الحدود الإشعاعية عن الحدود الاارد في البند رق (11.2). 3.4 ةلا ت د نسبة متبقيا المبيدا عن الحدود الاارد في البند رق (3.2) . 4.4 ةلا ت د بقا ا الأدو ة البيطر ة عن الحدود الاارد في البند رق( 9.2). 5.4 سمح بالمااد المضافة طبقا لما ورد في البند رق (7.2 .) 6.4 جب الالت ام بالحدود القصاى للملاثا الاارد في البند رق (5.2). 7.4 ان كان استخدام المحليا الطبيعية والاصطناعية وفقا للمتطلبا الاارد في البند6.2.) 8.4 ةلا ت د الحدود المكروبيالا ية عن الحدود الاارد بالبند رق (4.2). 9.4 فترا الصلاحية: مع عدم الإخلال بما ورد في البند (8.2 ) جب ةن اضح على بطاقة العبا ةو العبا تار خ الإنتاج وتار خ انتجا الصلاحية بطر قة غير رم ة كما لي: 1.9.4 كتب تار خ الإنتاج وتار خ انتجا الصلاحية باليام والشجر والسنة وبأرقام مرتبة غير مشتر بالإمكان ةن كتتى بالشجر والسنة للمنتجا التي تتجاوز فتر صلاحيتجا الثلاثة ةشجر. 2.9.4 جب ذكر ةي شروط خاصة بالتخ ن إذا كانت معتمده في هذا الشأن على العبا. 3.9.4 جب وضع بيانا التخ ن على مقربة من البيانا الإ ضاحية قدر الإمكان المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 5 10.4 جب ةن كان المنتجمطابقا للاشتراطا العامة للأغذ ة الحلال كما ورد في البند رق (10.2) . 11.4 ةن راعى في الإنتاج القااعد والشروط الصحية المنصاص عليجا في البند رق (12.2 .) 12.4 مع عدم الاخلال بما ورد فياللائحة التنية الاارد في البند (13.2) جب منع استخدم الدهان المجدر ة ئيا . 13.4 في حال استخدام المنتج لأي ادعا تغذوي او صحي جب ان تكان هذه الادعا ا وفقا للمتطلبا الاارد في اللائحة التنية الاارد في البند رق 2.2)) . 14.4 ةلا ت دمتبقيا الكحال الإ ثيلي (الإ ثانال) في الأغذ ة عن الحدود الاارد في البند رق (16.2 .) 15.4 للججة المختصة الحق في طلب ةي مستندا ةو متطلبا إضافية لإثبا سلامة ومأمانية الأغذ ة الخاصة ةو المكانا الداخلة في تركيبتجا. 16.4 منع ةن كان شكل المنتج صيدلاني (كبسالة حقنة قرصtablet" حبابPills") ةو ةن تكان طر قة تعبئته في عباا ةو شرائط مما قد عطي المستجلك انطباع خاطئ عن المنتج. 1.16.4 مكن ةن كان شكل الأغذ ة الخاصة كالتالي ةقراص للمضغ (حيث تكان قاعد المنتج غذائي مثل شاكالاتة ةو عسل ةو لاكاز ةو غيره) بخاخ للت ةو للحلق سائل مسحاق معينا (lozenges) ةمبالة قطر ةو قرص فاار (Effervescent tablet.) 17.4 عند الحا ة جب تاضيحالجرعة الماصى بجا للاستجلاك اليامي وعند الحا ة مكن تاضيحجا حسب التئة المستجدفة. 5. البيانات الإيضاحية مع عدم الإخلال بما نصت عليه اللائحة التنية الاارد في البند رق (1.2) واللاائح التنية الخاصة ان و د جب ةن اضح على البطاقة ما لي: 1.5 لا جاز استخدام التسمية“تغذوي خاص" ةو ةي تعبير مماثل بالاقتران مع الاس إلا إذا كان المنتج طابق التعر ف الاارد في البند (1.3 .) المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 6 2. 5 جب ةن ت تاضيح السمة الممي الأساسية وليس الحالة المقصاد تقد الغذا لجا بحيث ت ذكرها بتعابير وصتية مناسبة بالقرب تماما من اس الغذا (مثل: منختض السعرا الحرار ة). 3.5 التار خ وتعليما التخ ن 1.3.5 جب ذكر التار خ و فترا الصلاحية وتعليما التخ ن وفقا لما ورد في البند1.2 .) 2.3.5 جب ةن تضاف عند الضرور إلى بطاقة المنتج تعليما تخ ن العباا المتتاحةللأغذ ة ذا الاستعمالا التغذو ة الخاصة وذلك لضمان احتتاظ المنتج بسلامته وقيمته الغذائية بعد فتح العبا . 3.3.5 ضاف تحذ ر على بطاقة المنتج في حال تعذر تخ ن المنتج بعد فتح العبا ةو عدم إمكانية تخ نه في العبا ذاتجا بعد فتحجا. 4.5 جب ذكر الحالا الخاصة التي ستعمل فيجا الغذا والكمية المناسبة المسماح بتناولجا اميا على بطاقة المنتج. 5.5 جب ذكر طر قة التحضير والاستعمال عند الل وم 6 البيانات التغذوية: 1.6 جبتاضيح مقدار الطاقة لكل 100 غرام ةو لكل100 ملليتر من المنتج ةو لكل حصة غذائية للمنتج على ةن ت التعبيرعن الطاقة بالكيلا كالاري ةو سعر حرار ة. 2.6 جب تاضيح عدد غراما البروتين والكرباهيدرا المتاحة (الكرباهيدرا المغذ ة و الالياف الغذائية) الدهان و الدهان المشبعة و الدهان المتحالة و الكاليسترول و الصاد ام و المجماع الكلي للسكر ا و السكر المضاف لكل 100 غرام ةو لكل100 ملليتر من المنتج 3.6 جب تاضيح الكمية الكلية للعناصر الغذائية ةو المكانا الناعية الأخرى التي تحدد السمة الممي الأساسية للاستخدام التغذوي الخاص لجذا المنتج وتكان لكل 100 غرام ةو لكل100 ملليتر من المنتج بالصار التي باع بجا 7. المكونات الاختيارية 1.7 مكن اضافة المكانا التالية إلى الأغذ ة الخاصة المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 7 1.1.7 الأحماض الدهنية 2.1.7 الأحماض الأمينية 3.1.7 الطحالب مثل السبيرولينا 4.1.7 الألياف الغذائية 5.1.7 البكتير االنافعة والمعانا الحيا ة ( Probiotics and Prebiotics.) 6.1.7 الكالا ين 1.6.1.7 في حال إضافة الكالا ين إلى المكملا الغذائية جب كتابة المعلاما التالية على البطاقة 1.1.6.1.7 عبار (كالا ينوعبار (در ة غذائية) مع تحد د مصدره الحيااني. 2.1.6.1.7 تاضيح طبيعة الكالا ين في قائمة المكانا كالتالي (كالا ين متحلل ةو ببتيد الكالا ين 3.1.6.1.7 تاضيح تركي الكالا ين في المنتج على بطاقته الغذائية. 7.1.7 نباتا ةو ةعشاب ومستخلصاتجما 8.1.7 ميلاتانين 9.1.7 الإن المساعدCoenzyme Q 10 (CoQ 10) . 10.1.7 الان ما وتشمل ما لي: 1.10.1.7 اما لي وبروتيي المستخرج من Aspergillus flavus oryzae or Aspergillus niger ( amylase and protease derived from Aspergillus flavus oryzae or Aspergillus niger). 2.10.1.7 بروميلينbromelin). 3.10.1.7 فيسينficin). 4.10.1.7 انتيرتي (invertase). 5.10.1.7 بابينpapain). المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 8 6.10.1.7 بيكتينيpectinase). 7.10.1.7 بيبسينpepsin). 8.10.1.7 ر نيت وبروتينrennet and protein —coagulating enzymes ). 9.10.1.7 لاكتيlactase) . 10.10.1.7 لا بيLipase .) 2.7 مكن إضافة ةي مكانا ةخرى غيروارد في البند ( 1.7) ةعلاه بعد تقيي سلامتجا ومأمانيتجا للاستجلاك الآدمي من قبل الججة المختصة. 8 . التعبئة: مع عدم الإخلال بما نصت عليه اللائحتين التنيتين السعاد تين في البند (17.2) و18.2) فإنه جب عند التعبئة مراعا الشروط التالية: 1.8 جب ةن تكانالعباا ومااد التعبئة مصناعة من مااد آمنة . 2.8 منعةن كان شكل المنتج صيدلاني (كبسالة حقنة قرص " tablet" حبابPills") ةو ةن تكان طر قة تعبئته في عباا ةو شرائط مما قد عطي المستجلك انطباع خاطئ عن المنتج. 3.8 مكن ةن كان شكل المكملا الغذائية كالتالي 1.3.8 ةقراص للمضغ (حيث تكان قاعد المنتج غذائي مثل شاكالاتة ةو عسل ةو لاكاز ةو غيره). 2.3.8 بخاخ للت ةو للحلق. 3.3.8 سائل. 4.3.8 مسحاق. 5.3.8 معيناlozenges.) 6.3.8 ةمبالة 7.3.8 قطر المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 9 8.3.8 قرص فاارEffervescent tablet.) 9 النقل والتخزين: مع عدم الإخلال بما نصت عليه اللائحة التنية الخليجية الاارد بالبند (19.2) فإنه جب ةن نقل و خ ن المنتج بطر قة مناسبة تحميه من التلاث والتلف وعند در ة حرار لا ت د عن °25م المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 10 المصطلحات الفنية الأغذ ة ذا الاستخداما التغذو ة الخاصةFood for Special Dietary Uses ………...……… المكملا الغذائيةFood Supplements …………………………………………………. الجلاتينGluten……………………………………………………………………… الأغذ ة المستعملة لأغراض طبية خاصة Foods for Special Medical Purposes …………… الإدعا ا التغذو ةNutrition Claims …………………………………… ……………... البيانا التغذو ةNutrition Facts ………………………………………………………. السعرا الحرار ةCalories……………………………………………………………. المواصفة القياسية الخليجية GSO DS 0000 :2020 11 المراجع 1. CODEX STAN 146 -1985, GENERAL STANDARD FOR THE LABELLING OF AND CLAIMS FOR PREPACKAGED FOODS FOR SPECIAL DIETARY USES. 2. Health Canada , Labelling Requirements fo r Foods for Special Dietary Use.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_WT_DS_371-41.pdf

s_WT_DS_371-41

WT/DS371/41 3 de agosto de 2020 (20-5368) Página: 1/2 Original: inglés TAILANDIA - MEDIDAS ADUANERAS Y FISCALES SOBRE LOS CIGARRILLOS PROCEDENTES DE FILIPINAS COMUNICACIÓN DE TAILANDIA Se ha recibido de la delegación de Tailandia la siguiente comunicación, de fecha 30 de julio de 2020, con el ruego de que se distribuya al Órgano de Solución de Diferencias (OSD). _______________ Tailandia expone a continuación el contenido de su intervenc ión en la reunión del OSD de 29 de julio de 2020 con respecto al punto 12 del orden del día relativo a la diferencia Tailandia - Medidas aduaneras y fiscales sobre los cigarrillos procedentes de Filipinas (DS371). 1. Señor Presidente, le agradezco la oport unidad de formular una declaración en la reunión de hoy. 2. Tailandia se remite a sus declaraciones anteriores pronunciadas en las reuniones del OSD de 5 de marzo y 29 de junio de 2020. 3. Las circunstancias de esta diferencia no han cambiado desde la últi ma reunión del OSD . Como ha explicado anteriormente Tailandia, las apelaciones que presentó en los dos procedimientos sobre el cumplimiento de conformidad con el artículo 21.5 del ESD no se han completado debido al estancamiento del Órgano de Apelación . En consecuencia, la posición de Tailandia sigue siendo la misma que ha planteado en reuniones anteriores del OSD, a saber, que cualquier petición de suspensión de concesiones en virtud del artículo 22.2 del ESD en la presente diferencia sería indebida, ya qu e los procedimientos sobre el cumplimiento de conformidad con el artículo 21.5 no han concluido . Dado que estas apelaciones están en curso, el OSD no ha adoptado ningún informe de un grupo especial o del Órgano de Apelación que pueda servir de base para la solicitud de suspensión de concesiones presentada por Filipinas. 4. La solicitud de suspensión de concesiones presentada por Filipinas también es contraria al acuerdo sobre la secuencia firmado por las partes en esta diferencia . El acuerdo sobre la secuen cia establece que Filipinas no solicitaría medidas de retorsión hasta que no concluyera el procedimiento previsto en el artículo 21.5, que incluye un procedimiento del Órgano de Apelación en caso de apelación . Dado que las apelaciones de Tailandia no han c oncluido, Filipinas no puede, en esta etapa, solicitar autorización para suspender concesiones u otras obligaciones en virtud del artículo 22.2 del ESD. 5. Además, en caso de que Filipinas, por cualquier razón, sostuviera que las normas contenidas en el acuerdo sobre la secuencia ya no son aplicables, ello eximiría a Tailandia del compromiso de no oponerse a la petición de Filipinas por el hecho de estar fuera del plazo de 30 días previsto en el artículo 22.6 del ESD . Como reconoció Filip inas en su intervención en la reunión del OSD de 29 de junio de 2020, del artículo 22.6 del ESD se desprende claramente que cualquier solicitud de suspensión de concesiones debe ser autorizada por el OSD "dentro de los 30 días siguientes a la expiración de l plazo prudencial" .1 Habida cuenta de que el plazo prudencial en la presente diferencia 1 Comunicación de Filipinas, WT/DS371/38, de fecha 2 de julio de 2020, párrafo 5. WT/DS371/41 - 2 - expiró el 15 de mayo de 2012, el plazo previsto en el artículo 22.6 para autorizar la suspensión de concesiones expiró el 15 de junio de 2012. 6. Como también hemos i ndicado, Tailandia discrepa de la opinión de Filipinas de que la actual crisis del Órgano de Apelación constituye un "aspecto de procedimiento" relacionado con los procedimientos establecidos en el acuerdo sobre la secuencia . Como la propia Filipinas ha reconocido, por ejemplo, en su comunicación que figura en el documento WT/DS371/32, de 12 de febrero de 2020, el Órgano de Apelación suspendió sus trabajos debido a "limitaciones institucionales" como resultado del número insuficiente de Miembros del Órgano de Apelación . No obstante , sin perjuicio de la posición de Tailandia, mi delegación ha entablado conversaciones con espíritu constructivo, como solicitó Filipinas en su carta de fecha 9 de marzo de 2020. E stamos dispuestos a proseguir estas conversaciones con el Presidente del OSD y Filipinas con el fin de encontrar un medio de resolver estas limitaciones institucionales, incluida la manera de hacer avanzar el proceso de selección de nuevos Miembros del Órgano de Apelación. 7. Señor Presidente, Tailandia ap rovecha esta oportunidad para recordar a los Miembros de la OMC la urgencia de resolver los problemas que afectan al Órgano de Apelación . La crisis del Órgano de Apelación ha planteado importantes desafíos al sistema basado en normas, en particular para to das las apelaciones pendientes . La solución de la crisis del Órgano de Apelación es una cuestión prioritaria para evitar medidas unilaterales contrarias al artículo 23 del ESD. 8. Por último, como se indicó en intervenciones con Filipinas que tuvieron lugar con anterioridad, Tailandia sigue abierta a un diálogo bilateral con el fin de determinar una posible solución a las cuestiones sustantivas planteadas en esta diferencia sustanciada en la OMC que sea mutuamente aceptable para ambas partes. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_GRD21.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_GRD21

G/TBT/N/GRD/21 20 de septiembre de 2019 (19-6084) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica : GRANADA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable: Grenada Bureau of Standards (Oficina de Normas de Granada) Queens Park P.O. Box 2036 St. George's Granada Teléfono : (473) 440 -5886/6783 Fax:(473) 440 -5554 Correo electrónico: gdbs@spiceisle.com Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un orga nismo o autoridad diferente: 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de: 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda ; en otro caso partida del arancel nacional . Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : Especificaciones para neumáticos de vehículos de pasajeros (ICS : 83.160.10). 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado : Specification for Pneumatic Passenger Tyre s (Especificaciones para neumáticos de vehículos de pasajeros) . Documento en inglés (27 páginas). 6. Descripción del contenido : Se notifica la primera revisión de la Norma de Granada GDS 26: 1 997, por la que se deroga la versión en vigor . La Norma notific ada es aplicable a los neumáticos , nuevos y usados , de los vehículos de pasajeros. La Norma notificada n o es aplicable a los neumáticos recauchutados ni reesculturados , ni a los neumáticos usados destinados a ser recauchutados o reesculturados. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes : Se recomienda el carácter obligatorio para proteger la salud de las personas y la seguridad del medio ambiente. 8. Documentos pertinentes: • Norma GDS 26: 2 019, Especificaciones para neumáticos de vehículos de pasajeros. G/TBT/N/GRD/21 - 2 - 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción : marzo de 2020 Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : marzo de 2020 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : 22 de diciembre de 2019 11. Textos disponibles en : Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso, de otra instituc ión: Grenada Bureau of Standards (Oficina de Normas de Granada) Queens Park P.O. Box 2036 St. George's Granada Teléfono : (473) 440 -5886/6783 Fax: (473) 440 -5554 Correo electrónico: gdbs@spiceisle.com

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN23_MWI80.pdf

r_G_TBTN23_MWI80

G/TBT/N/MWI/80 14 février 2023 (23-1033) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : MALAWI Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable: Malawi Bureau of Standards (Bureau de normalisation du Malawi) Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des observations concernant la notification doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: Director General (Directeur général) Malawi Bureau of Standards (Bureau de normalisation du Malawi) P.O Box 946 Blantyre Malawi Téléphone:+265 887 376 444 Fax: +265 1 870 756 Courrier électronique: info@mbsmw.org 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], 3.2 [ ], 7.2 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, sinon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Chapitre 22 du SH ; ICS 67 .160.10 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du texte notifié : DMS 1695 :2021, Cider and perry - Specification (Cidre et poiré - Spécifications), 3 pages, en anglais 6. Teneur : Le projet de norme malawienne notifié établit les exigences et les méthodes d'échantillonnage et d'essai applicables au cidre e t au poiré destinés à la consommation humaine. 7. Objectif et justification, y compris la nature des problèmes urgents, le cas échéant : Information des consommateurs, étiquetage ; prévention de pratiques de nature à induire en erreur et protection des cons ommateurs ; exigences en matière de qualité G/TBT/N/MWI/80 - 2 - 8. Documents pertinents: 1. MS 19 : Labelling of prepacked foods - General standard; 2. MS 21 : Food and food processing units - Code of hygienic conditions; 3. MS 107 : Alcoholic beverages - Methods of test; 4. MS 237 : Food additives - General standard; 5. MS 302 : Contaminants and toxins in food and feed - General standard. 6. ISO 4832. M icrobiologie des aliments - Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des coliformes - Méthode par comptage des colo nies 7. ISO 4833. M icrobiologie de la chaîne alimentaire - Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des micro -organismes - Partie 1 : Comptage des colonies à 30 °C par la technique d'ensemencement en profondeur 8. ISO 6579. M icrobiologie des aliments - Méthode ho rizontale pour la recherche des Salmonella spp; et 9. ISO 7251. M icrobiologie des aliments - Méthode horizontale pour la recherche et le dénombrement d'Escherichia coli présumés - Technique du nombre le plus probable 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : à déterminer Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : à déterminer 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : 60 jours à compter de la date de notification 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les textes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [X] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: Director General (Directeur général) Malawi Bureau of Standards (Bureau de normalisation du Malawi) P.O Box 946 Blantyre Malawi Téléphone:+265 887 376 444 Fax: +265 1 870 756 Courrier électronique: info@mbsmw.org https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/TBT/MWI/23_1054_00_e.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_PRESS_946.pdf

q_WT_PRESS_946

PRESS/ 946 13 February 2024 (24-1253) Page: 1/2 PRESS RELEASE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Norway pledges NOK 20 million to support sustainable economic growth in LDCs through EIF The government of Norway has contributed CHF 1.2 million (NOK 14.7 million) to help least -developed countries (LDCs) sustain the progress they have achieved with the support of the Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF). This is the first instalment of the N OK 20 million (approximately CHF 1.7 million) that Norway has pledged to the newly established EIF Interim Facility, which has been set up to bridge the gap between the end of Phase Two of the EIF and the establishment of a new multilateral support mechani sm for LDCs. Norway's pledge was confirmed at a ceremony attended by WTO Director -General Ngozi Okonjo -Iweala and Norway's WTO Ambassador Petter Ølberg on 12 February at the WTO. The WTO LDC Group Coordinator, Ambassador Kadra Hassan of Djibouti, and the EIF Executive Director, Ratnakar Adhikari, also took part in the ceremony. DG Okonjo -Iweala said: "We are delighted that Norway has stepped forward as the first contributor to the EIF Interim Facility, which will ensure that the EIF continues to function until the end of 2024. We are very grateful for this crucial support to a Facility that holds significant importance for the LDCs. It is our hope that with this contribution, ongoing projects will reach completion and be seen to fruition. Our sincere than ks go to Norway for this generous donation of CHF 1.7 million." Norway's contribution to the EIF Interim Facility will help to enhance the trade environment for inclusive and sustainable growth in LDCs, helping to boost these countries' exports and access to international markets. Discussions are ongoing in a taskforce at the WTO around a future multilateral Aid for Trade support mechanism for LDCs. "Norway is pleased to be the first donor to contribute to the EIF Interim Facility. The Facility will bridge the gap between EIF Phase Two and the next multilateral Aid for Trade mechanism dedicated to LDCs," said Ambassador Ølberg. "The Interim Facility w as efficiently established together with our EIF partners, with well -balanced projected development gains that build on the work done during the programme's Phase Two. We must preserve the momentum and continuity in LDCs that work hard to develop their tra de strategies. I hope this commitment can inspire other donors to join us in supporting this vital initiative." Ambassador Hassan stated: "The LDC Group deeply appreciates the Facility's support in addressing the critical needs and diverse trade prioriti es outlined in the Doha Programme of Action for LDCs . The Facility's catalytic operations will play a crucial role in sustaining the progress achieved through PRESS/ 946 - 2 - the EIF programme in each LDC. We are grateful for the Facility's demand -driven approach and commend its commitment to cost effectiveness as well as its agility and flexibility. We call on additional donors to contribute to the Facility, so as to reinforce our collective efforts towards strengthening LDCs' integration into the multilateral trading system and achieving sustainable development." Norway has contributed a total of approximately CHF 42.4 million to the EIF -led programmes since 2007, including this new pledge to the EIF Interim Facility. The EIF is the only global Aid for Trade initiative dedicated exclusively to empowering LDCs to use trade as an engine for sustainable economic growth development and poverty reduction. It is a unique global partnership between LDCs, donors and partner agencies – including the WTO – which work together to build trade capacity in LDCs. Further information o n the EIF is available here . END

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_L_1362.pdf

r_G_L_1362

G/L/ 1362 G/SG/247 19 août 2020 (20-5658) Page: 1/1 Conseil du commerce des marchandises Comité des sauvegardes Original: français NOTIFICATION IMMÉDIATE AU CONSEIL DU COMMERCE DES MARCHANDISES DES RÉSULTATS DES CONSULTATIONS MENÉES AU TITRE DE L'ARTICLE 12:3 PÂTES ALIMENTAIRES MADAGASCAR La communication ci -après, datée du 17 août 2020, est distribuée à la demande de la délégation de Madagascar. _______________ Conformément à l'article 12:5 de l'Accord sur les sauvegardes, le Conseil du commerce des marchandises est notifié des résultats des consultations menées au titre de l'ar ticle 12.3 de l'Accord sur les sauvegardes. La référence du document contenant les notifications de Madagascar au titre des articles 12.1b, 12.1c et article 9, note de bas de page 2 de l'Accord sur les sauvegardes concernant les pâtes alimentaires au sujet desquelles les consultations ont eu lieu est: G/SG/N/8/MDG/4 -G/SG/N/10/MDG/4 -G/SG/N/11/MDG/4/Suppl.1 distribué le 21 février 2020. Les consultations ont été menées respectivement avec Maurice et l'Égypte le 10 mars 2020 et le 14 juillet 2020 en vue d'examiner les renseignements figurant dans le document du 21 février 2020 susmentionné. Les participants ont examiné les renseignements pertinents et échangé des vues sur les mesures projetées. Suite à ces consultations, Madagascar a tenu c ompte les préoccupations de Maurice et de l'Égypte et a accepté d'offrir aux principaux membres ayant un intérêt substantiel dans la fourniture des pâtes alimentaires à Madagascar un contingent fixe annuel de 10 000 tonnes pour les trois années restantes d e la période de l'application de la mesure définitive. Le contingent sera réparti au prorata de leur part dans les importations totales de Madagascar au cours des trois dernières années. Les importations hors contingent seront soumises au droit additionnel de 30 % de la valeur CAF. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN21_BRA1197.pdf

r_G_TBTN21_BRA1197

G/TBT/N/BRA/1197 23 juin 2021 (21-5103) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : BRÉSIL Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable : Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency - ANVISA (Agence brésilienne de surveillance sanitaire) Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des observations concernant la notification doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology - INMETRO (Institut national de métrologie, d e qualité et de technologie) Téléphone : +(55) 21 2145.3817 Fax: +(55) 21 2563.5637 Courrier électronique: barreirastecnicas@inmetro.gov.br Site Web: www.inmetro.gov.br/barreirastecnicas 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, s inon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Préparations et articles pharmaceutiques visés aux sous - positions n° 3006.10.10 à 3006.60.90 (SH 3006). 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du texte notifié : Décision ( Resolution ) - RDC n° 518, 1 0 juin 2 021. (2 pages, en portugais) 6. Teneur : La décision notifiée modifie la Décision n° 67 du 2 3 mars 2 016, qui spécifie les dispositions relatives aux demandes de qualification, au renouvellement de licences, aux modifications post -qualification, à l'externalisation des essais, à la suspension et l'annulation des Centres d'équivalence pharmaceutique, et établit d'autres dispositions. 7. Objectif et justification, y compris la nature des problèmes urgents, le cas échéant : Protection de la santé ou de la sécurité des personnes 8. Documents pertinents: 1) Journal officiel brésilien n° 111 du 1 6 juin 2 021, section 1, page 244 ; 2) Décision RDC n° 67 du 2 3 mars 2 016 https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/ -/resolucao -rdc-n-518-de-10-de-junho -de-2021- 326187827 http://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/2869447/RDC_67_2016_COMP.pdf/127d 6731-f34c-493a-9ecc-aff2290f55e5 G/TBT/N/BRA/1197 - 2 - 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : 16 juin 2 021 Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : 16 juin 2 021 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : Sans objet 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les textes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [ ] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, l e cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) SIA, Trecho 5, Área Especial 57 Brasília - DF (Brésil) CEP: 71.205 -050 Téléphone : +(55) 61 3462.5402 Site Web: www.anvisa.gov.br http://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/6285602/RDC_518_2021_.pdf/e1a67 53a -3899-40f0-9144-22d31bbba955

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_WT_COMTD_RTA5N1.pdf

r_WT_COMTD_RTA5N1

WT/COMTD/RTA5/N/1 30 juillet 2019 (19-4996) Page: 1/1 Comité du commerce et du développement Original: espagnol NOTIFICATION D'UN ACCORD COMMERCIAL RÉGIONAL 1. Membre(s) adressant la notification: Mexique 2. Date de la notification: 23 juillet 2019 3. Notification au titre: [ ] de l'article XXIV:7 a) du GATT de 1994 [ ] de l'article V:7 a) de l'AGCS [X] du paragraphe 4 a) de la Clause d'habilitation 4. Parties à l'Accord: Argentine et Mexique 5. Date de signature: 24 octobre 1986 6. Date(s) d'entrée en vigueur: 1er janvier 1987 7. Description succincte de l'Accord: L'Accord de complémentarité économique n° 6 vise notamment à intensifier, diversifier et promouvoir le commerce réciproque, à coordonner et compléter les activités économiques , et à stimuler l'investissement. 8. Le texte et les listes, annexes et protocoles y relatifs sont: [ ] communiqués au Secrétariat de l'OMC (format électronique) [X] accessibles par le (les) lien(s) Internet officiel(s) ci -après: Secrétariat de l'Associat ion latino -américaine d'intégration (ALADI): "http://www.aladi.org/nsfaladi/textacdos.nsf/vacewebR?OpenView&Start=1&Count=800 &Expand=2#2 "

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBTN20_USA1576A1C1.pdf

q_G_TBTN20_USA1576A1C1

G/TBT/N/USA/1576/Add.1/Corr.1 2 August 2023 (23-5245) Page: 1/1 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Original: English NOTIFICATION Corrigendum The following communication, dated 2 August 2023, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of the United States of America . _______________ Pipeline Safety: Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards: Technical Corrections 1 August 2023 - 88 FR (Federal Register) 50056, 49 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 192 and 195: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -2023-08-01/html/ 2023-15904.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -2023-08-01/pdf/2023 -15904.pdf AGENCY: Pipeline a nd Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Correcting amendments. SUMMARY: PHMSA is issuing editorial and technical corrections clarifying the regulations promulgated in its 8 April 2022, final rule titled "Pipe line Safety: Requirement of Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards" for certain gas, hazardous liquid, and carbon dioxide pipelines (notified in G/TBT/N/USA/1576/Add.1 ). The final rule also codifies the results of judicial review of that final rule. DATES: These corrections are effective as of 1 August 2023. These correcting amendments to the 8 April 2022 final rule and the notice of proposed rulemaking notified as G/TBT/N/USA/1576 are identified by Docket Number PHMSA -2013-0255. The Docket Folder is available on Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/PHMSA -2013- 0255/document and provides access to primary and supporting documents as well as comments received. Documents are also accessible from Regulations.gov by searching the Docket Number . https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/TBT/USA/23_11441_00_e.pdf __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NBRA2266.pdf

r_G_SPS_NBRA2266

G/SPS/N/BRA/2266 26 mars 2024 (24-2566) Page: 1/2 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION 1. Membre notifiant : BRÉSIL Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés: 2. Organisme responsable : The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency - ANVISA (Agence nationale de surveillance sanitaire) 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figurant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC . Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Technologie alimentaire (domaine 67 de l'ICS) 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable: [X] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [ ] Régions ou pays spécifiques: 5. Intitulé du texte notifié : Draft Resolution 1242, 20 March 2024 (Projet de décision n° 1242 du 2 0 mars 2 024). Langue(s) : portugais . Nombre de pages : 20. Draft: http://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/6733685/CONSULTA+PUBLICA+N%C2%BA +1242+COPAR.pdf/a0d74f07 -42e6-4bc6-915f-1ec69da79901 Formulaire pour la présentation d'observations: https://pesquisa.anvisa.gov.br/index.php/761881?lang=pt -BR Le lien vers le formulaire pour la présentation d'observations sera disponible le 2 9 mars 2024. https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2024/SPS/BRA/24_02238_00_x.pdf 6. Teneur : Le projet de décision notifié contient des dispositions relatives aux exigences sanitaires applicables aux préparations pour nourrissons et jeunes enfants, aux aliments de sevrage et préparations à base de céréales pour nourrissons et jeunes enfants, aux préparations pour l'alimentatio n entérale et aux préparations diététiques thérapeutiques destinées à traiter les erreurs innées du métabolisme. Ce règlement sera aussi notifié au Comité OTC. 7. Objectif et raison d'être : [X] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [ ] santé des animaux, [ ] préservation des végétaux, [ ] protection des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [ ] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à des parasites. 8. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente ? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle: [X] Commission du Codex Alimentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : − CXS 73 -1981 − Codex Stan 74 -1983 − CAC/GL 10 -1979 − CXS 72 -1981 G/SPS/N/BRA/2266 - 2 - − CXS 74 -1981 [ ] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OMSA) (par exemple, numéro de chapitre du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux aquatiques) : [ ] Convention internationale pour la protection des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP): [ ] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme internationale pertinente? [X] Ou i [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internati onale: 9. Autres documents pertinents et langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: 10. Date projetée pour l'adoption (jj/mm/aa) : sera déterminée à l'issue de la période de consultation. Date projetée pour la publication (jj/mm/aa) : sera déterminée à l'issue de la période de consultation. 11. Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : [ ] Six mois à compter de la date de publication, et/ou (jj/mm/aa) : sera déterminée à l'issue de la période de consultation. [ ] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : [ ] Soixante jours à compter de la date de distribution de la notification et/ou ( jj/mm/aa ): 26 juin 2 024 Organisme ou autorité désigné pour traiter les observations : [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: International Affairs Office (Bureau des affaires internationales) Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency - ANVISA (Agence nationale de surveillance sanitaire) Téléphone : +(55 61) 3462 5402/5404/5406 Courrier électronique: rel@anvisa.gov.br 13. Texte(s) disponible(s) auprès de : [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: International Affairs Office (Bureau des affaires internationales) Brazilian Health Re gulatory Agency - ANVISA (Agence nationale de surveillance sanitaire) Téléphone : +(55 61) 3462 5402/5404/5406 Courrier électronique: rel@anvisa.gov.br

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NRUS185.pdf

s_G_SPS_NRUS185

G/SPS/N/RUS/185 3 de abril de 2020 (20-2711) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN DE MEDIDAS DE URGENCIA 1. Miembro que notifica : FEDERACIÓN DE RUSIA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable : Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Servicio Federal de Vigilancia Veterinaria y Fitosanitaria) 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC ; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de parti da de la ICS) : Aves de corral vivas y huevos para incubación, carne y productos de aves de corral que no han sido sometidos a un tratamiento térmico (al menos 70 °C), piensos y aditivos para piensos (excepto aditivos de origen vegetal y de síntesis química y microbiológica), equipo y material usados anteriormente para transporte, cría, mantenimiento, sacrificio y despiece de aves de corral procedentes de la República Dominicana (SA : 0105, 0106, 0207, 0208, 0209, 0210, 0407, 0408, 0410000000, 0510000000, 050 4000000, 0505, 0507, 1501, 0511, 150300, 1506000000, 151610, 151800, 160100, 1602, 160300, 190220, 190420, 2104, 2106, 2309, 2301, 2309, 3101000000, 3502, 350400, 3507, 4206000000, 9508100000, 9705000000). 4. Regiones o países que podrían verse afectados, en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [ ] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [X] Regiones o países específicos : República Dominicana 5. Título del documento notificado : Letter of the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance No . FS-KS-7/6356 as of 02 March 2020 (Circular N° FS -KS- 7/6356 del Servicio Federal de Vigilancia Veterinaria y Fitosanitaria, de 2 de marzo de 2020). Idioma(s) : ruso. Número de páginas : 1. https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/SPS/RUS/20_2423_00_x.pdf 6. Descripción del contenido : La Circular notificada restringe temporalmente la importación de aves de corral vivas y los productos de aves de corral mencionados en el punto 3 procedentes de la República Dominicana, debido a un brote del virus de la enfermedad de Newcastle. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser : [ ] inocuidad de los alimentos, [X] sanidad animal, [ ] preservación de lo s vegetales, [ ] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [ ] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. 8. Naturaleza del (de los) problema(s) urgente(s) y justificación de la medida de urgencia : El objetivo de la medida notificada es evitar la introducción de productos contaminados al territorio de la Federación de Rusia. G/SPS/N/RUS/185 - 2 - 9. ¿Existe una norma internacional pertinente ? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [X] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejemplo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animales Acuáticos) : Capítulo 10.9. [ ] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : [ ] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? [X] S í [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible, en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional: 10. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s) en que están disponibles: 11. Fecha de entrada en vigor (día/mes/año) /período de aplicación (según corresponda) : 28 de febrero de 2020 [ ] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la noti ficación, [ ] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Servicio Federal de Vigilancia Veterinaria y Fitosan itaria) Orlikov pereulok 1/11 107139 Moscú Teléfono : +(7499) 975 43 47 Fax: +(7495) 607 51 11 Correo electrónico: info@svfk.mcx.ru 13. Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [ ] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Servicio Fed eral de Vigilancia Veterinaria y Fitosanitaria) Orlikov pereulok 1/11 107139 Moscú Teléfono : +(7499) 975 43 47 Fax: +(7495) 607 51 11 Correo electrónico: info@svfk.mcx.ru

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_MAQRN_URY3.pdf

s_G_MAQRN_URY3

G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 1° de noviembre de 2019 (19-7418) Página: 1/9 Comité de Acceso a los Mercados Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN DE CONF ORMIDAD CON LA DECIS IÓN SOBRE EL PROCEDI MIENTO DE NOTIFICACIÓN DE RESTRICCIONES CUANTI TATIVAS (G/L/59/REV.1) URUGUAY La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 21 de octubre de 2019, se distribuye a petic ión de la delegación del Uruguay . A. Miembro notificante: Uruguay B. Fecha de la notificación: 21 de octubre 2019 C. Primera notificación: Sí No, la última notificación se presentó con la signatura (signatura del documento): G/MA/QR/N/URY/ 2 D. Tipo de notificación: 1. Completa (es decir, notificación de todas las restricciones cuantitativas en vigor) 2. Cambios de una notificación presentada anteriormente con la signatura (signatura del documento) consistentes en lo siguiente: 2.1 Establecimiento de nuevas restricciones, enumeradas en la sección 1. 2.2 Eliminación de restricciones, como se describe en la casilla G infra. 2.3 Modificación de una restricción notificada anteriormente, como se indica en la sección 1. 3. Notificación inversa de restricciones mantenidas por (Miembro): E. La notificación proporciona información sobre el siguiente período bienal : 2018-2020 y se refiere a restricciones en vigor al 21 de octubre 2019 F. La presente no tificación contiene información relativa a : Sección 1 : Lista de restricciones cuantitativas actualmente en vigor. Sección 2 : Referencia a otras notificaciones presentadas a la OMC que contengan información sobre restricciones cuantitativas actualmente en vigor e información adicional. G. Observaciones de carácter general, con inclusión de una descripción de la eliminación de restricciones notificada en el apartado 2.2 de la casilla D y la fecha en que esas restricciones dejaron de estar en vigor. Los códigos arancelarios incluidos en la columna 3 se refieren a la Nomenclatura Común del MERCOSUR (NCM).  En español solamente. G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 2 - Section 1: List of quantitative restrictions that are currently in force RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Prohibición a la importación de amianto o asbesto P 6811ex 6812.50ex Productos que contengan amianto o asbesto Artículo XX(b) del GATT; Convenio Internacional del Trabajo Nº 162 y Recomendación Nº 172 aprobada por la 72ª Conferencia Internacional del Trabajo de la O.I.T. Decreto Nº 154, de 30/4/02 2 Prohibición a la importación de vinos P 2204.21ex 2204.29ex 2204.30ex Vinos en envases que excedan a un litro de capacidad Artículo XX(d) del GATT; Reglamento Vitivinícola del MERCOSUR Decreto Nº 325, de 3/9/97, de 1996; Decreto Nº 356, de 4/7/91 3 Prohibición a la importación de dispositivos electrónicos para fumadores P 8543.70.99 Dispositivos electrónicos para fumar: "cigarrillo electrónico", "e - cigarettes", "eciggy", "e - cigar", entre otros, incluidos aquellos que se ofrezcan como alternativa en el tratamien to del tabaquismo y sus accesorios Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 534, de 23/11/09; Ley Nº 17.793 de 16 de julio de 2004. 4 Prohibición a la importación de vacunas (enfermedad del conejo) P 3002.30.90 Vacunas para inmunizar contra la enfermedad hemorrágica del conejo Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 388, de 15/10/07. 5 Prohibición a la importación de medicamentos con Triazolam P 3003.90.74 3004.90.64 Especialidades farmacéuticas que contengan como principio activo la droga Triazolam Artículo XX(b) del GATT Resolución de 4/6/92 del Ministerio de Salud Pública (MSP) G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 3 - RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 Prohibición a la importación de aerosoles, espumas, vitrinas refrigeradas, solventes y esterilizantes e instalaciones eléctricas de aire acondicionado que contengan sustancias agotadoras de la capa de ozono prohibidas P 3814.00ex 3907ex 3909.50 3917ex 3920ex 3921ex 3925e x 3926ex 8414.30 8415ex 8418ex 8419ex 8424.10 8479ex 8509ex 8510ex Envasados aerosoles, espumas, vitrinas refrigeradas, solventes y esterilizantes, instalaciones centrales de aire acondicionado Artículo XX (b), (g) del GATT; Convenio de Viena para la Protección de la Capa de Ozono (1985); Protocolo de Montreal relativo a las sustancias agotadoras de la capa de ozono (1987) Decreto Nº 345, de 23/9/04; Ley Nº 15.986 del 16 de noviembre de 1988; Ley Nº 16.157 del 12 de noviembre de 1990 7 Prohibición a la importación de naftas con plomo P 2710.12.4 Naftas cuyo contenido total de plomo supere los 13 mg/l Artículo XX (b), (g) del GATT Ley Nº 17.775, de 20/5/04 8 Prohibición a la importación de insecticidas P 3808ex Insecticidas a base de organoclorados para todo uso agronómico Artículo XX (b), (g) del GATT Resolución de 23/9/97, del Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP) 9 Prohibición a la importación de productos fitosanitarios P 38ex Productos fitosanitarios a base de metil paration para todo uso agrícola Artículo XX (b), (g) del GATT Resolución de 30/1/02 del Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP) 10 Prohibición a la importación de bromato de potasio P 2827.51.00 Bromato de potasio con destino al uso en alimentos, incluyendo bebidas Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 27, de 22/1/04 G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 4 - RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 Prohibición a la importación de medicamentos, que contengan: Furazolidona, Nitrofurazona, etc. P 3003ex 3004ex 3006ex Medicamentos, promotores de crecimiento y alimentos, destinados a los animales cuya carne o subproductos, leche, huevos o miel, sean utilizados para el consumo humano, que contengan en su formulación: Furazolidona, Nitrofurazona, Nitrofurantoína Furaltadon a, Nifurprazina, Nifuraldezona y sus diferentes sales Artículo XX(b) del GATT Resolución de la DGSG y de la DGSSAA de fecha 23 de mayo de 1998, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP) . 12 Prohibición a la importación de productos para crecimiento de las especies bovina, ovina, suina, equina y aves, con sustancias arsenicales y antimoniales P 3003ex 3004ex 3006ex Productos para la promoción del crecimiento o engorde de las especies bovina, ovina, suina, equina y aves, para el consumo humano, que en su formulación incluyan sustancias arsenicales y antimoniales Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 219, de 10/5/89 13 Prohibición a la importación de medicamentos veterinarios, con sustancias de efecto hormonal estrogénico P 3003ex 3004ex 3006ex Medicamentos veterinarios utilizados para la promoción del crecimiento o engorde en las especies bovina, ovina, suina, equina y aves, que en su formulación incluyan sustancias de efecto hormonal estrogénico Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 915, de 28/12/ 88 14 Prohibición a la importación de concentrados proteicos y harinas de huesos, de mamíferos P 05ex Concentrados proteicos y harinas de huesos, provenientes de mamíferos en la alimentación de rumiantes, caninos y felinos Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 139, de 17/4/96 G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 5 - RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 Prohibición a la importación de Cloranfenicol base y sus sales P 2941.40 Cloranfenicol base y sus sales, solas o asociadas a otros productos químicos, al estado de materia prima o productos terminados o incorporados en alimentos para animales Artículo XX(b) del GATT Resolución de 27/11/86 del Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP) 16 Prohibición a la importación de desechos peligrosos P 2710.91 2710.99 2713.90 3006.92 3825.10 3825.20 3825.30 3825.41 3825.49 3825.50 3825.61 3825.69 3825.90 Desechos peligrosos Artículo XX(b), (g) del GATT, Convenio de Basilea sobre el Control de los Movimientos Transfronterizos de los Desechos Peligrosos y su Eliminación (1989) Ley Nº 17.220, d e 11/11/99 G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 6 - RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 17 Prohibición a la importación de vehículos usados P 87ex Vehículos usados: automóviles y vehículos comerciales livianos (hasta 1.500 kg de capacidad de carga; ómnibus; camiones; camiones tractores para semirremolques; chasis con motor o sin motor; remolques o semirremolques; carrocerías y/o cabinas; motocicletas (incluidos los ciclomotores) y velocípedos equipados con motor auxiliar, con sidecar o sin él, sidecares, así como las partes y accesorios usados de dichos vehículos (prohibición temporal) Artículo XX(b), (g) del GATT Ley Nº 17.887, de 19/8/05 El Poder Ejecutivo podrá autorizar excepciones a la prohibición de importar vehículos usados, siempre que medie, previo otorgamiento de un certificado de necesidad por parte de los Ministerio s de Industria, Energía y Minería y de Transporte y Obras Públicas y que se refieran a los bienes listados en el art. Nro. 2 de la Ley Nro.17.887 18 Prohibición a la importación de pinturas y barnices P 3208.10ex 3208.20ex 3208.90ex 3209.10ex 3209.90ex 3210.00ex 3213.10ex 3213.90ex 3215.11ex 3215.19ex 3215.90ex 3407.00.10 Punturas y barnices, tintas gráficas y masterbatches con 600 ppm o más de plomo Artículo XX(b), (g) del GATT Ley Nº 17.775/2004 y Decreto Nº 69/011, de 15/2/11 G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 7 - RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 Prohibición a la importación de contaminantes orgánicos persistentes P 2903.82 2903.92 Contaminantes orgánicos persistentes: aldrina o aldrín, clordano, diedrina o diedrín, endrina o endrín, heptacloro o hexaclorobenceno, mírex (docecaloro), toxafeno y DDT Artículo XX(b), (g) del GATT, Convenio de Estocolmo sobre Contaminantes Orgánicos Persistentes (2003) Decreto Nº 375/005, de 3/10/05 20 Prohibición a la importación de contaminantes orgánicos persistentes P 2903.81 Contaminantes orgánicos persistentes: alfa - hexaclorociclohexano, betahexaclorciclohexano y clordecona) Artículo XX(b), (g) del GATT, Convenio de Estocolmo sobre Contaminantes Orgánicos Persistentes (2003) Decreto Nº 68/011, de 15/2/11 21 Prohibición a la importación de productos que contienen mercurio P 8539.31.00ex 8539.3200ex 8539.39.00ex 9018.90.92ex 9025.11.10ex Lámparas fluorecentes (CFL, LFL, CCF, EEFL), lámparas de alta descarga y de vapor, termómetros y esfigmomanómetros que contengan mercurio Artículo XX(b), (g) del GATT, Convenio de Minamata sobre el Mercurio (2013) Decreto Nº 15/019, de 23/01/19 22 Prohibición a la importación de bolsas plásticas no biodegradables P 3923.21.10 3923.21.90 3923.29.10ex 3923.29.90ex Bolsas plásticas no biodegradables o compostables Artículo XX (g) del GATT Decreto 03/019, de 07/01/2019 G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 8 - RC Nº Descripción general de la restricción Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basados en el SA (201 7) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor (es decir, ley, reglamento o decisión administrativa) Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 23 Prohibición a la importación de biberones de policarbonato P 3924.10.00 Biberones de policarbonato que contengan en su composición Bisfenol A (2, 2bis (4 -hidroxifenil) propano (BPA), No. CAS 000080 -05-7 Artículo XX (b) del GATT Ordenanza ministerial (MSP) No. 158 de fecha 21 de marzo de 2012 La importación de biberones quedará sujeta a la presentación por parte de la firma importadora de una declaración jurada con datos solicitados por la ordenanza y de una declaración jurada en origen del responsable técnico de la empresa fabricante donde constate la no utilización del monómer o BPA en la fabricación de los biberones 24 Restricción a la importación de armas de fuego, municiones explosivas y otros materiales relacionados NAL 3001.00.00 3002.00.00 3603.00.00 3604.10.00 3604.90.90 9301.10.00 9302.00.00 9303.20.00 Material de armamento, sustancias químicas peligrosas, explosivos, armas de fuego y materiales relacionados Artículo XX (b) del GATT, Convención Interamericana contra la Fabricación y el Tráfico Ilícito de Armas de Fuego, Municiones, Explosivos y Otros Materiales Decreto 91/93, Ley 17300 El Servicio de Material y Armamento será el encargado de recibir las solicitudes de importación de explosivos, armas de fuego, municiones y sustancias químicas peligrosas y otorgar el certificado de importación, previo informe técnico correspondiente. G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 9 - Sección 2: Referencia a otras notificaciones presentadas a la OMC que contengan información sobre restricciones cuantitativas actualmente en vigor Los Miembros cumplimentarán esta sección en caso de que una notificación hecha de conformidad con otra dispo sición en materia de notificación (por ejemplo, las establecidas en el Acuerdo sobre la Agricultura, el Entendimiento relativo a las disposiciones del GATT de 1994 en materi a de balanza de pagos, el Acuerdo sobre Salvaguardias, el Acuerdo sobre Procedimien tos para el Trámite de Licencias de Importación, etc.) contenga información sobre una restricción cuantitativa en vigor no enumerada en la sección 1. 1. Acuerdo sobre la Agricultura A. ¿Se notificó información sobre una restricción cuantitativa? Sí No B. En caso afirmativo, indiquen la signatura del documento pertinente e incluyan cualquier elemento de inf ormación que no figure en la notificación: 2. Entendimiento relativo a las disposiciones del GATT de 1994 en materia de balanza de pagos A. ¿Se notificó información sobre una restricción cuantitativa? Sí No B. En caso afirmativo, indiquen la signatura del documento pertinente e incluyan cualquier elemento de información que n o figure en la notificación : 3. Acuerdo sobre Salvaguardias A. ¿Se notificó información sobre una restricción cuantitativa? Sí No B. En caso afirmativo, indiquen la signatura del documento pertinente e incluyan cualquier elemento de información que no figure en la notificación : G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 10 - 4. Acuerdo sobre Procedimientos para el Trámite de Licencias de Importación (licencias no automáticas) A. ¿Se notificó información sobre una restricción cuantitativa? Sí No B. En caso afirmativo, indiquen la signatura del documento pertinente e incluyan cualquier elemento de información que no figure en la notificación : Signatura de la notificación Descripción general Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basado(s) en el SA (2012 ) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 G/LIC/N/3 /URY/13 Exclusiones de prohibición de importar motores de ciclo diésel y "kits". CP 8408.20.90 Motores de ciclo diésel y "kits" Permitir la importación de motores de ciclo diesel y "kits" para vehículos que tengan una finalidad productiva. Artículo XI (2) del GATT Ley 18.172, Decreto Nºs 290/008 y 277/009 Licencia previa no automática de importación emitida por el Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Minería (MIEM. La Dirección Nacional de Industrias emitirá las licencias cuando el interesado demuestre en forma documentada que los bienes a importar se destinan a los fines indicados en el Decreto No 290/008. G/LIC/N/3 /URY/13 Importación de Ácido Acético NAL 2915.21.00 y 2915.21.00 Ácido acético Artículo XX(b) del GATT Decreto Nº 75/009 En el caso del ácido acético de grado alimentario el otorgamiento de la licencia estará sujeta a la comprobación por parte del LATU del grado alimentario respectivo. En los demás ácidos acéticos la licencia se otorgará siempre y cuando la solicitud se comp lete en forma y las importaciones anteriores realizadas por el solicitante hayan justificado un uso reglamentario de acuerdo al Art 2 del Decreto Nº 75/009. G/LIC/N/3 /URY/13 Exclusiones de Importar vehículos usados NAL 8704.22, 8704.23 y 8704.32 Vehículos usados Articulo XX(b) del GATT Art.2 Ley nro.17.887 El Poder Ejecutivo podrá autorizar excepciones a la prohibición de importar vehículos usados siempre que medie, previo otorgamiento de un certificado de necesidad por parte de los Ministerios de Industria, Energía y minería, y de Transporte y Obras Públicas y que se refieran a los bienes listados en el artículo 2 de la Ley nro.17.887. G/MA/QR/N/URY/3 - 11 - Signatura de la notificación Descripción general Tipo de restricción Código(s) de la(s) línea(s) arancelaria(s) afectada(s), basado(s) en el SA (2012 ) Designación detallada del producto Justificación en el marco de la OMC y motivos de la restricción, por ejemplo, otros compromisos internacionales Fundamento jurídico nacional y entrada en vigor Administración, modificación de medidas notificadas anteriormente y otras observaciones 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 G/LIC/N/3 /URY/13 Licencia para la importación de semillas, plantas, productos terminados o semielaborad os de cannabis con fines medicinales o de investigación científica. NAL 0602.10.00, 0602.90.89, 1209.99.00, 1211.90.90, 2202.10.00 Semillas, plantas, productos terminados o semielaborados de cannabis con fines medicinales o de investigación científica Articulo XX(b) del GATT Decreto nro. 46/015, Ley 19.172. Los interesados en importar y exportar semillas/plantas/ terminados o semielaborados de cannabis con fines medicinales o de investigación científica, deberán solicitar la correspondiente Autorización de Importación/Exportación a la División Sustancias Controladas del Ministerio de Salud Pública de acuerdo a lo establecido en la normativa vigente. 5. Otras notificaciones A. ¿Se notificó información sobre una restricción cuantitativa en otras notificaciones? Sí No B. En caso afirmativo, indiquen la signatura del documento pertinente e incluyan cualquier elemento de información que no figure en la notificación : __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_PRESS_927.pdf

q_WT_PRESS_927

PRESS/ 927 7 June 2023 (23-3879) Page: 1/2 PRESS RELEASE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Australia donates AUD 2 million to WTO Fisheries Funding Mechanism The government of Australia is providing AUD 2 million (approximately CHF 1.2 million) to the WTO Fisheries Funding Mechanism to assist developing members and least -developed country members in implementing the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies. Senator the Hon Tim Ayres, Assistant Minister for Trade and Assistant Minister for Manufacturing, presented the contribution to WTO Director -General Ngozi Okonjo -Iweala on 7 June, at the informal WTO ministerial meeting held on the side lines of the Organisation for Economic Co -operation and Development's (OECD) Ministerial Council Meeting in Paris, France. Director -General Okonjo -Iweala said: "I extend my deep appreciation to Australia for its very generous donation to the WTO Fisheries Funding Mechanism. I am heart ened to see Australia so rapidly make good on its pledge to support the Fund. Australia's donation is a strong affirmation of its support for the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies as a means to improving the health of our ocean, and will make a real differe nce for developing and LDC members seeking assistance to implement the new agreement. " Assistant Minister Ayres said: "Australia is pleased to make this contribution of AUD 2 million to the WTO Fisheries Funding Mechanism. It will help developing WTO memb ers implement the historic agreement reached at the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12) and ultimately help curb overfishing and bolster food security. We stand ready to continue this important work with the WTO membership and encourage other members to con tribute to the Fund or request assistance." Because the new Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies will involve adjustments and enhancements to WTO members' legislative and administrative frameworks, transparency and notification requirements, and fisheries man agement policies and practices, Article 7 of the Agreement provides for the creation of a funding mechanism to provide targeted technical assistance a nd capacity building to help developing and least -developed country members with implementation once they have deposited their instruments of acceptance. The fund is operated by the WTO with partner organizations, namely the Food and Agriculture Organizat ion (FAO) of the United Nations, the International Fund for Agricultural Development, and the World Bank Group, which bring to bear relevant expertise and allow the WTO to leverage its own expertise. More information on the fund, which became operational on 8 November, is available here. PRESS/ 927 - 2 - Including the most recent donation, Australia's total contribution to the various WTO trust funds from 2002 to 2023 is CHF 21,253,455. END

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_IP_N_1JPN68.pdf

q_IP_N_1JPN68

IP/N/1/JPN/68 IP/N/1/JPN/D/17 7 June 2023 (23-3893) Page: 1/2 Council for Trade -Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Original: English NOTIFICATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT JAPAN : DESIGN ACT (ACT NO. 125 OF 1959) Notifying Member JAPAN Details of the notified legal text Title Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959) Subject matter Industrial designs Nature of notification [X] Main dedicated intellectual property law or regulation [ ] Other law or regulation Link to legal text* https://ip -documents.info/2023/IP/JPN/23_10039_00_e.pdf https://ip -documents.info/2023/IP /JPN/23_10039_00_x.pdf Notification status [ ] First notification [ ] Amendment or revision to notified legal text [X] Replacement or consolidation of notified legal text(s) Previous notification(s) referred to IP/N/1/JPN/65, IP/N/1/JPN/D/16 Brief description of the notified legal text The revised act is to relax the requirements for reinstatement of rights which are lost due to the failure to comply with prescribed time -limits. Language(s) of notified legal text English, Japanese Entry into force 1 April 2023 Other date Adoption: 21 May 2021 Notification details Submission date of notification 22 May 2023 Other information IP/N/1/JPN/68 • IP/N/1/JPN/D/17 - 2 - Agency or authority responsible International Policy Division Japan Patent Office 3-4-3 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda -ku Tokyo 100 -8915, Japan Telephone: +81-3-3581-1101 Fax: +81-3-3581-0762 * Links are provided to texts of laws and regulations notified under the TRIPS Agreement in the form supplied by the Member concerned; the WTO Secretariat does not endorse or revise their content.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_SPS_NBRA1985.pdf

q_G_SPS_NBRA1985

G/SPS/N/BRA/1985 6 January 2022 (22-0127) Page: 1/2 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English NOTIFICATION 1. Notifying Member: BRAZIL If applicable, name of local government involved: 2. Agency responsible: Secretariat of Animal and Plant Health and Inspection (SDA) - Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA) 3. Products covered (provide tariff item number(s) as specified in national schedules deposited with the WTO; ICS numbers should be pr ovided in addition, where applicable): Abyssinian mustard seeds (Brassica carinata) 4. Regions or countries likely to be affected, to the extent relevant or practicable : [ ] All trading partners [X] Specific regions or countries: Argentina 5. Title of the notified document: Ordinance (Portaria) nº485 of 21 december 2021. Establishes the phytosanitary requirements for the import of Abyssinian mustard seeds (Brassica carinata) originating from Argentina . Language(s): portuguese . Number of pages: 1 https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/ -/portaria/sda -n-485-de-21-de-dezembro -de-2021- 369753810 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2022/SPS/BRA/22_0101_00_x.pdf 6. Description of content: Establishes the phytosanitary requirements for the import of Abyssinian mustard seeds (Brassica carinata) originating from Argentina 7. Objective and rationale: [ ] food safety, [ ] animal health, [X] plant protection, [ ] protect humans from animal/plant pest or disease, [ ] protect territory from other damage from p ests. 8. Is there a relevant international standard? If so, identify the standard: [ ] Codex Alimentarius Commission (e.g. title or serial number of Codex standard or related text) : [ ] World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (e.g. Terrestrial or Aquatic Animal Health Code, chapter number) : [ ] International Plant Protection Convention (e.g. ISPM number) : [X] None Does this proposed regulation conform to the relevant international st andard? [ ] Yes [ ] No If no, describe, whenever possible, how and why it deviates from the international standard: G/SPS/N/BRA/1985 - 2 - 9. Other relevant documents and language(s) in which these are available: 10. Proposed date of adoption (dd/mm/yy) : 3 January 2022 Proposed date of publication (dd/mm/yy) : 23 December 2021 11. Proposed date of entry into force: [ ] Six months from date of publication , and/or (dd/mm/yy) : 3 January 2022 [ ] Trade facilitating measure 12. Final date for comments: [ ] Sixty days from the date of circulation of the notification and/or (dd/mm/yy) : Not applicable Agency or authority designated to handle comments: [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail address (if avai lable) of other body: Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply Secretariat of Trade and International Relations. E-mail: sps@agricultura.gov.br 13. Text(s) available from: [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail address (if available) of other body: Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply Secretariat of Trade and International Relations. E-mail: sps@agricultura.gov.br

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NKWT74.pdf

s_G_SPS_NKWT74

G/SPS/N/KWT/74 26 de febrero de 2020 (20-1455) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN 1. Miembro que notifica : EL ESTADO DE KUWAIT Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable : Public Authority for Food and Nutrition (Autoridad Pública de Alimentación y Nutrición) 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC ; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): Etiquetas de alimentos, productos alimenticios preenvasados, queso halloumi, queso mozzarella, queso cottage, queso cheddar, sucedáneos de nata, mezcla de leche desnatada (descremada) y grasa vegetal. 4. Regiones o países que podrían verse afectados , en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [X] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [ ] Regiones o países específicos: 5. Título del documento notificado : Artículo Nº 1 de 2020 , Circular Nº 14 -22 de 2019. Idioma(s) : árabe. Número de páginas : 10. https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/SPS/KWT/20_1463_00_x.pdf 6. Descripción del contenido : Reglamentos técnicos y normas de la Autoridad Pública de Alimentación y Nutrición para la exportación de productos alimenticios a Kuwait. − Etiquetado de los productos alimenticios preenvasados. − Procedimientos relativos al etiquetado nutricional de los alimentos. − Cantidad máxima autorizada de ácidos grasos trans y req uisito de declaración del contenido de esas sustancias por ración en el etiquetado nutricional. − Norma relativa al queso halloumi. − Norma relativa al queso mozzarella. − Norma relativa al queso cottage. − Norma relativa al queso cheddar. − Norma relativa a los requisitos esenciales para los productos sucedáneos de nata pasteurizados, esterilizados y ultrapasteurizados. − Mezcla de leche desnatada (descremada) evaporada y grasa o aceite vegetal, también conocida como mezcla de leche desnatada c ondensada sin edulcorantes y grasa vegetal, destinada al consumo directo o a elaboración posterior. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser : [X] inocuidad de los alimentos, [ ] sanidad animal, [ ] preservación de los vegetales, [ ] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [ ] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. G/SPS/N/KWT/74 - 2 - 8. ¿Existe una norma internacional pertinente ? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [ ] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejemplo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animales Acuá ticos) : [ ] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : [X] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? [ ] Sí [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible , en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional : La Organización de Normalización del Golfo es una organización de normalización para los Estados miembros del Consejo de Cooperación del Golfo. 9. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s ) en que están disponibles: 10. Fecha propuesta de adopción (día/mes/año) : 31 de mayo de 2020 Fecha propuesta de publicación (día/mes/año) : 20 de febrero de 2020 11. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : [ ] Seis meses a partir de la fecha de publicación, y/o (día/mes/año) : 31 de mayo de 2020 [ ] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : [ ] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : 31 de mayo de 2020 Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [ ] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Public Authority for Food and Nutrition (Autoridad Pública de Alimentación y Nutrición) 207, Sabah Al Salem, Kuwait http://svc.kmun.gov.kw/ 13. Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Public Authority for Food and Nutrition (Auto ridad Pública de Alimentación y Nutrición) 207, Sabah Al Salem, Kuwait Sitio web: http://svc.kmun.gov.kw/

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN24_CHN1803.pdf

s_G_TBTN24_CHN1803

G/TBT/N/CHN/1803 12 de febrero de 2024 (24-1161) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica : CHINA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable: State Administration for Market Regulation (Standardization Administration of the P.R.C.) (Administración Estatal para la Reglamentación del Mercado (Administración de Normalización de la República Popular China)) Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad di ferente: 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], 3.2 [ ], 7.2 [ ], o en virtud de: 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda ; en otro caso partida del arancel nacional . Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : Rociadores de separación de vidrio (SA : 842420 ; 84248) ; (ICS: 13.220.10). 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado : Norma Nacional de la República Popular Chi na, Automatic sprinkler system -Part23 : Glass separation sprinklers (Sistema de rociadores automáticos . Parte 23 : Rociadores de separación de vidrio) . Documento en chino (30 páginas). 6. Descripción del contenido : El documento notificado especifica la cla sificación, el coeficiente de flujo nominal, la rosca del interfaz, el marcado de colores, las especificaciones, los requisitos, los métodos de prueba, las normas de inspección, el manual de funcionamiento, el embalaje, el transporte y el almacenamiento de los rociadores de separación de vidrio del sistema de rociadores automáticos. El texto se aplica a los rociadores de separación de vidrio de los sistemas de rociadores automáticos . No se aplica a rociadores, rociadores automáticos de respuesta rápida para extinción temprana (ESFR, por sus siglas en inglés), rociadores domésticos, rociadores para usos específicos y rociadores de apertura/cierre. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes : protección de la salud o seguridad humanas. 8. Documentos pertinentes: - G/TBT/N/CHN/1803 - 2 - 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción : por determinar Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : 6 meses a partir de su adopción 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : 60 días después de la fecha de notificación 11. Textos disponibles en : Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso, de otra institución: WTO/TBT National Notification and Enquiry Center of the People's Republic of China (Servicio Nacional de Información y de Notificación OMC/OTC de la República Popular China) Teléfono : +86 10 57954633/ 57954627 Correo electrónico: tbt@customs.gov.cn https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2024/TBT/CHN/24_01348_00_x.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_CHN1343.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_CHN1343

G/TBT/N/CHN/1343 5 de agosto de 2019 (19-5064) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica : CHINA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable : State Administration for Market Regulation (Standardization Administration of the P.R.C.) (Administración Estatal para la Reglamentación del Mercado [Administración de Normalización de la República Popular China]) Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de tel éfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad diferente: 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [ ], 2.10.1 [X], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de: 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda ; en otro caso partida del arancel nacional . Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : Cláxones para vehículos de motor de l as categorías M, N y L ; Vehículos automóviles, tractores, velocípedos y demás vehículos terrestres ; sus partes y accesorios (SA: 87); Equipos para vehículos de carretera (ICS: 43.040). 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado : Norma Nacional de la República Popular China, Performance Requirements and Test Methods of Horn for Motor Vehicles (Requisitos de aptitud y métodos de prueba de los cláxones para v ehículos de motor) . Documento en chino (7 páginas). 6. Descripción del contenido : La Norma notificada establece los requisitos de aptitud y los métodos de prueba para los cláxones eléctric os y de aire, así como los requisitos de aptitud de carga y los mét odos de prueba. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes : Las partes interesadas tuvieron muchos problemas tras la aplicación . A fin de reducir la contaminación acústica, se ajusta el nivel mínimo de pr esión sonora del conjunto del vehículo, pasando de 93 dB (A) a 87 dB (A). Por consiguiente, se necesita una notificación urgente ; protección de la salud o seguridad humanas ; otros 8. Documentos pertinentes: - 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción : 4 de abril de 2019 Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : 1º de enero de 2020 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : - G/TBT/N/CHN/1343 - 2 - 11. Textos disponibles en : Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso, de otra institución: WTO/TBT National Notification and Enquiry Center of the People's Republic of China (Servicio Nacional de Información y de Notificación OMC/OTC de la República Popular China) Teléfono : +86 10 57954630/57954627 Correo electrónico: tbt@customs.gov.cn https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/TBT/CHN/19_4307_00_x.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBT_M85.pdf

q_G_TBT_M85

RESTRICTED G/TBT/M/85 2 February 2022 (22-0806) Page: 1/116 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF 10 -12 NOVEMBER 2021 CHAIRPERSON: MRS ELISA MARIA OLMEDA DE ALEJANDRO Note by the Secretariat1 1 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ................................ ................................ ....................... 1 2 IMPLEMENTATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE AGREEMENT ................................ 1 2.1 Specific Trade Concerns ................................ ................................ ............................. 1 2.2 Ninth Triennial Review ................................ ................................ ........................... 114 2.3 Exchange of experiences ................................ ................................ ....................... 115 3 OBSERVERS ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 115 3.1 Updates ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 115 3.2 Pending Requests ................................ ................................ ................................ . 116 4 ANNUAL REPORT (2021) OF THE COMMITTEE TO THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS (CTG) ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 116 5 OTHER BUSINESS ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 116 6 DATE OF NEXT MEETING ................................ ................................ ........................ 116 1 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1.1. The Committee adopted the agenda contained in WTO/AIR/TBT/21 . 2 IMPLEMENTATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE AGREEMENT 2.1 Specific Trade Concerns The Chairperson noted with respect to the minutes of the meeting, that it was what Members said orally that was the definitive reference for the preparation of the minutes by the Secretariat. If Members wished to summarize their statements orally but nevertheless include detailed technical statements on the record (in the minutes), Members were always free to ask the Secretariat to circulate such information separately, for example as a "JOB" or a "W" document; this statement would then be referenced (and hyperlinked) in the minutes of the meeting.2 1 This document has been prepared under the Secretariat's own responsibility and is without prejudice to the positions of Members or to their rights and obligations under the WTO. 2 For an example of this, see the document referenced in the United States' statement in para 2.194 below . G/TBT/M/85 - 2 - 2.1.1 Withdrawn concerns 2.1. The Chair reported that the following STCs had been withdrawn from the agenda at the request of the concerned Member: • Dominican Republic – General standard on fiscal control and security mechanisms for manufacturers, producers and importers of finished alcohol and tobacco products • Malaysia - Guideline for Approval of Electrical Equipment (Electricity Regulation 1994) Information Booklet 2018 Edition (GP/ST/No.14/2017) • Republic of Korea - Ballast Water Management Act (ID 606) • United States - Appliance Efficiency for Sprinkler Bodies (ID 653) 2.1.2 New Specific Trade Concerns 2.1.2.1 Chile - Efficiency analysis and/or test protocol for electrical products, G/TBT/N/CHL/525 (ID 7043) 2.2. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. The Korean government appreciates this opportunity to provide our comm ents regarding Chile's "Efficiency Analysis and/or Test Protocol for Electrical Products: Washer -Dryers (PE No. 1/06 -1/2:2020)", notified to the WTO on 24 July 2020 as G/TBT/N/CHL/525 , and in effect from January 2022 (PE No. 1/06/3:2020). We sincerely respect the vigorous efforts o f the Chilean government in protecting the environment and providing relevant information to consumers. Furthermore, Korean companies are fully committed to complying with the regulations. However, we would like to present the following comments reflecting concerns raised by Korean companies regarding the energy efficiency regulations for "washer -dryers". If the energy consumption tolerance for "washer -dryers" follows the example of tolerance for "washing machines" and is established including minus toleran ce, we are concerned that washer -dryers with even better performance in energy efficiency may still fail to pass the post -market surveillance test. To prevent this, most countries, including the EU, have set the tolerance of energy consumption and water co nsumption for washer -dryers to "less than +10%". Therefore, we respectfully request the Chilean government to consider establishing both the energy consumption tolerance and water consumption tolerance to "less than +10%" for energy efficiency labels on wa sher-dryers. We would like to recall that, on 12 October 2020, the Korean government submitted similar comments regarding the efficiency regulation for "washing machines" to the Chilean WTO TBT Enquiry Point, but there has been no reply from the competent authorities of Chile yet so we hope to receive your response as soon as possible on this matter as well. 2.3. In response, the representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile thanks Korea for its interest in Chile's notifications on energy effic iency protocols and their objective of protecting the environment and providing consumers with information. The information provided in this specific trade concern in relation to the energy efficiency tolerances for household washer -dryers, notified by Chi le in July 2020 in document G/TBT/N/CHL/525 , and on which no comments were received within the 60 -day period, shall be sent to the Electricity and Fuel Board and we hope to be able to respond to Korea through the TBT/WTO Enquiry Point as has been done in the past. 2.1.2.2 European Union - Draft Commission Delegated Regulation amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, G/TBT/N/EU/826 (ID 7054) 2.4. The representative of The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu provided the following statement. The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu (TPKM) would like to express concerns about G/TBT/N/EU/826 regarding Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (the CLP Regulat ion) of the European Union. We acknowledge the intention of the EU to protect public health and the environment by modifying the classification of toxic substances and mixtures under the CLP 3 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 704 . 4 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 705 . G/TBT/M/85 - 3 - regulation. The proposed measure reclassifies the trimethylolprop ane triacrylate (TMPTA, CAS No. 15625 -89-5) as Category 2 of Carcinogen. It causes widespread concerns among our industries. Firstly, TMPTA has a wide range of uses in various products, such as coating materials, ink, and adhesives. Once the regulation is amended, manufacturers must relabel and reconfigure their products, which will have a significant impact on the trade of TMPTA and TMPTA -containing products. Even worse, there is no alternative to TMPTA, and the search for the substitute will take a long t ime and huge cost, resulting in serious damage to global trade. In our views, this proposed measure is inconsistent with Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement as it creates unnecessary obstacles to international trade. 2.5. Secondly, we would like to urge the EU to observe the requirements of scientific justification stated in Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement. The decision made by the Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) of the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) was based on the studies of the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) in 2012. Although animal tumours were observed in those studies, there is a widely shared view that those studies lack reliability and have major technical discrepancies. Experts further raised challenges against the NTP study, which used acetone as a carrier for dermal absorption, and did not reflect "normal" exposure. Therefore, the decision to adopt the proposed measure with limited scientific evidence may be too hasty and cause unnecessary trade barriers to TMPTA or TMPTA -related products. Further more, there are still ongoing studies aiming to demonstrate that acetone used in the NTP studies as the vehicle is not appropriate for comparative absorption studies and efforts have been devoted in obtaining better insights into the metabolism of TMPTA in the mammalian body by conducting toxicokinetic studies. We believe that these analyses will offer the EU more detailed information to decide whether the proposed measures are appropriate. Given the inadequacy of the scientific basis and the possibility of the decision being reversed by the ongoing research, we would like to suggest that the EU consider suspending the proposed measure, respond to the question raised, and wait until more research results become available. Thirdly, according to this notificat ion, the amendment will be adopted in the fourth quarter of 2021. It will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the official journal of the EU, which will be about two months after adoption. Given that the proposed measure is not due to urgent needs and industries need more time to prepare, we would like to call on the EU to extend the transition period to ensure consistency with Article 2.12 of the TBT Agreement. We submitted our comments to the EU on 30 September 2021 and would be grateful if the above -mentioned comments could be taken into account and look forward to a written response. 2.6. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to thank the Separate Customs Territory o f Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu for raising this issue and for the written comments concerning the 18th adaption to technical and scientific progress (ATP) of the Classification Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation.5 In this statement, the European Union will also react to the questions from Brazil with regard to the classification of the 2 -ethilhexanoic acid (2 -EHA), which have been uploaded to eAgenda under the STC No 516, because it is covered by the same draft measure. The EU would like to info rm that written replies to the comments of Chinese Taipei and Brazil are currently under preparation and will be delivered in the following weeks. Therefore, the EU would like to make some general points at this stage and refer to the written replies for d etails. The EU would like to stress that the proposed classification of TMPTA and 2 -ethylhexanoic acid (2 -EHA) is based on the scientific opinion of the Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), which assesses all reliable an d adequate scientific evidence that is available. This assessment is done on the basis of the classification criteria of the CLP Regulation, which are fully aligned with the criteria of the UN GHS. During the RAC assessment, stakeholders were given the opp ortunity to comment on the proposal, including on the available scientific evidence. 2.7. The EU would also like to note that in case new relevant scientific information, which may lead to a change of the harmonized classification, becomes available in the futu re, this could be submitted to an EU member State in accordance with Article 37(6) of the CLP Regulation so that a re - assessment of the classification could potentially be initiated. In addition, the EU notes that a 5 Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC , and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353 31.12.2008, p. 1), consolidated version available at: https://eur -lex.europa.eu/legal - content/EN/TXT/?uri= CELEX%3A02008R1272 -20211001 6 European Union - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation) ( ID 539 ). G/TBT/M/85 - 4 - harmonized classification under the CLP Regulation triggers obligations for labelling and packaging but does not entail in itself any automatic limitations on the use of a substance. While it is not excluded that potential use restrictions for a classified substance may in the future be assessed under other specific pieces of EU legislation, it is currently not indicated that there may be an impact on the trade of products using TMPTA and 2 -ethylhexanoic acid. Finally, concerning a grace period, the EU would like to point out that the notified dr aft will only become applicable 18 months after its entry into force, although it may be applied before the date of applicability on a voluntary basis. 2.1.2.3 China - National Standard of the P.R.C., Lithium Ion Cells and Batteries Used in Portable Electronic Equ ipments - Safety Technical Specification, G/TBT/N/CHN/1576 (ID 7067) 2.8. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea respects and supports China's efforts to introduce "National Standard of the P.R.C., Lithium Ion Cells and Batteries Used in P ortable Electronic Equipment – Safety Technical Specification" for the safety of the people. Furthermore, Korean companies are fully committed to complying with China's regulations. In March 2021, China notified its draft amendment, GB 31241 -20XX, of the N ational Safety Standard for Lithium -Ion Cells and Batteries, to the WTO as G/TBT/N/CHN/1576 . In May 2021, Korea submitted comments regarding the notification and requested China to align its draft amendment with China's current regulation of GB 31241 -2014 and, in a broader sense, with the international standard of IEC 62133 -2:2017. We suggested that the exception clause (5.3.1) "By agreement between the cell manufacturer and the end product manufacturer, component cells used in the manufacture of a battery need not be marked," be maintained, and that an identical crush test standard (7.6) be applied to cells of all types (cylindrical, prismatic, button, pouch types), as provided in the current regulation (GB 31241 -2014). In July 2021, China answered that "Different battery standard s, including GB 31241 -2014 and IEC 62133 -2, have all proposed requirements for marking and crush test, so that draft amendment GB 31241 -20XX also proposed equivalent requirements. This is necessary to effectively trace and identify cells and better evaluat e the safety of pouch cells." Despite China's kind reply, Korean companies continue to experience difficulties, so we would like to reiterate this issue. 2.9. We understand that in the IEC 62133 -2, there is a clause that clearly exempts the marking requirement on cells when it is agreed between the manufacturers, while there is no clause that requires only the pouch cells to pass a bar -crush test. We request China to present the rationales of your previous reply and reexamine them. If China requires cell marking for product tracking/identification, this requirement should be amended to oblige only the indication of minimal information, such as model designation and date of manufacture. Since the cell is a component that is not directly used by consumers, the expo rt destination is determined when the cell is assembled into the battery pack or end product, and therefore, it is difficult to separately mark it for the purpose of sale in China alone. This will involve a lot of time and cost due to production line chang es and additional certification, which will impose excessive and costly burdens on the related industries. Korea would like to request China once again to revise the said standard in accordance with the relevant international standards. 2.10. In response, the re presentative of China provided the following statement. Identification is very important for the safe use of cells and batteries. Cells are an important component of battery. Without necessary marking for purpose of identification, they cannot be traced an d identified effectively. It has been reported many times in recent years that cells without proper identification marking cause confusion to market regulation. Therefore, after much investigation and public consultation in the process of its formulation, the new specification requires cell body identification marking. We will not consider withdrawing the decision of deleting the exceptions. 2.1.2.4 Viet Nam - Draft National Technical Regulation on the fifth level of gaseous pollutants emissions for new assembled, manufactured and imported automobiles, G/TBT/N/VNM/174 (ID 7078) 2.11. The representative of Thailand provided the following statement. Thailand would like to express our gratitude to Viet Nam for providing additional information about the implementation of QCVN 109:2021/BGTVT through a bilateral consultation in January earlier this year and a response 7 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 706 . 8 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 707 . G/TBT/M/85 - 5 - on 16 July 2021. Despite the fact that Viet Nam has clarified that a transitional provision permits vehicles certified before a mandatory date of application of the Euro 5 emission standar d to continue production and assembly in accordance with the current emission standard under QCVN 86:2015/BGTVT corresponding to Euro 4 until an expiration date of the certificates, Thailand acknowledged that the regulation has been applied only to its dom estic automobile manufacturers and assemblers. Meanwhile, foreign counterparts with valid certificates have to comply with the new emission standard starting on 1 January 2022. The above -mentioned practices discriminate between domestic and imported automo biles which affect the cost of production unequally compared to Viet Nam domestic companies. 2.12. In light of concerns raised, Thailand wishes to remind Viet Nam of its obligation under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement to ensure that, in respect of technical r egulations, products imported from the territory of any Member shall be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to like products of national origin and to like products originating in any other country. Therefore, Thailand strongly request s Viet Nam to treat imported automobiles in a non - discriminatory manner and to avoid creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade. In addition, Thailand also calls on Viet Nam to notify relevant regulations, especially document No. 371/TTg -CN date d 26 March 2021 regarding implementing the agenda to apply the emission standards under Decision No. 49/2011/QD -TTg which stipulates that the manufactured, assembled, imported automobiles shall apply the Euro 5 emission standards (QCVN 109:2021/BGTVT) from 1 January 2022, to the WTO and provide Members with the opportunity for comments. 2.13. In response, the representative of Viet Nam provided the following statement. The document No. 371/TTg -CN dated 26 March 2021 affirms the principle of non -retroactivity of l egal regulations applicable to various types of manufactured, assembled automobiles which have been granted the certificate of technical safety and environment protection before 1 January 2022. According to Decision No. 49/2011/QD -TTg of the Prime Minister of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, all types of new manufactured, assembled and imported automobiles shall comply with the fifth level of gaseous pollutants emissions standard from 1 January 2022. Therefore, it is not discriminatory in application of the fifth level of gaseous pollutants emissions standard to new manufactured, assembled and imported automobiles. The principle of non -retroactivity is completely consistent with Article 28 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 to which Viet Nam and Thailand are both parties. In addition, the Document No. 371/TTg -CN is basically an instructive document for the Decision No. 49/2011/QĐ -TTg and is not necessary to notify this document under the TBT Agreement. 2.1.2.5 European Union - Draft Commission Reg ulation laying down ecodesign requirements for light sources and separate control gears pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulation(EC) No. 244/2009, (EC) No. 245/2009 and (EU) No. 119 4/2012, G/TBT/N/EU/606 (ID 7 089) 2.14. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea appreciates this opportunity to provide our comments regarding the "Commission Regulation laying down ecodesign requirements for light sources and separate control gears" (hereinafter referred to as "the regulations "), notified to WTO TBT Committee on 8 October 2018 as G/TBT/N/EU/606 and published on 1 October 2019. First of all, the Korean Government fully respects and supports the efforts of the EU to protect the environment. Furthermore, Korean companies are committed to complying with the r egulations. However, we would like to present the following comments reflecting concerns raised by Korean companies regarding the regulations. According to the regulations, which are scheduled to take effect on 1 September 2021, manufacturers should make s pare parts available to professional repairers for a minimum specified period after placing the last unit of the model on the market. For example, according to the Ecodesign Regulation (2019/2019), Annex II, 3.(1), manufacturers must provide spare parts fo r the light sources of refrigerators on the EU market after the enforcement of this regulation for a minimum period of seven years. It is impossible to use alternative light source components that satisfy the new regulation because some home appliances, such as discontinued refrigerator models, are not compatible with the alternative components without changing the appliances' internal structure. We understand that the EU's Ecodesign regulations for External Power Supply (EPS) and Motors specify exceptions for using existing service parts or spare parts for replacement, but there are no such exceptions for using spare parts in the 9 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 708 . G/TBT/M/85 - 6 - Ecodesign regulations for light sources and separate control gears. Therefore, we request the EU to make an exception of spare pa rts for the light sources of discontinued home appliances that are placed on the market before the date of the enforcement (1 September 2021), in a manner similar to the EPS and Motor Ecodesign regulations. 2.15. In response, the representative of the European U nion provided the following statement. The Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2020 setting ecodesign requirements for light sources and separate control gears does not have a specific exemption for products that are spare parts of discontinued electric home a ppliances. We would like to emphasise that the Regulation applies to new units of light sources and separate control gears placed for the first time on the EU market as from 1 September 2021. That which is placed on the EU market prior to 1 September 2021, can stay on shelves and in stock indefinitely. 2.1.2.6 United States - Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for Residential and Commercial Clothes Washers, G/TBT/N/USA/903, G/TBT/N/USA/903/Rev.1 (ID 70910) 2.16. The representative of China provided the following statement. China requests United Sta tes to: 1. Clarify the relationship between appendix J and appendix J2 and the implementation time. 2. Clarify the text content in Appendix J which is inconsistent: it is specified in chapter 2.12.1 to use large load for test evaluation, while table 3.3 in cludes both large load and small load. 3. Consider suggestions on "E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment" as follows: For Article 2, China supports the decision to add the test method of single inlet machine, and suggests adding specific evaluation procedur es, such as the evaluation on the water temperature heated under different procedures. For Article 9, in the new appendix J, the weights of large and small loads both are small, which is in the middle and lower section according to the capacity of the wash ing machine. Therefore, in this case, the energy consumption of the middle and lower capacity is evaluated, which is not in line with the actual use of the washing machine. The performance of the washing machine under large load is not tested. It is recomm ended to increase the large load weight to evaluate the upper capacity of the washing machine. For Article 15, if extreme dry load is required for each test cycle, in order to avoid the load that has not been cooled to room temperature being used for the t est, it is suggested that the load put into the washing machine for test should be cooled to room temperature. 2.17. For Article 17, when conducting the test of drum barrel volume, it shall be clearly stated that the volume at the depression of window pad shall not be included in the barrel volume. For Articles 20 and 21, the coefficients of cold water, warm water and hot water are based on the survey data of users' actual use habits. Actually, semi -automatic products rarely feed hot water during practical use. T herefore, it is suggested to collect more user data to adjust TUF ratio. For Article 59, it is not proper to delete the definitions of "compact" and "standard". Large capacity models have more advantages in energy consumption calculation, and the level it can reach due to mechanical structure strength is more advantageous than small capacity models (for example, the upper speed limit of large capacity is greater than that of small capacity). It is suggested to establish different energy consumption access l evels for large capacity and small capacity models, above 45L and below 45L shall be subject to different access levels. 2.18. In response, the representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States thanks China for its comments submitted on 29 October 2021 in response to our 3 September 2021 WTO notification to amend test procedures for residential and commercial clothes washers. The United States will take into consideration all comments received during the open comment period a nd respond to each substantive comment in the next published rulemaking document on the Test Procedures for Residential and Commercial Clothes Washers. 2.1.2.7 India - Important Instruction regarding Voluntary Star Labelling Programme for UHD (4K, 8K) Televisions (ID 71011) 2.19. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea would like to raise its concerns on India's Important Instruction regarding Voluntary Star Labelling Programme for UHD (4K, 8K) Television (hereinafter referred to as the "UHD TV regulation") which was not notified to the WTO TBT Committee and published on 21 January 2021. Previously, Korea had submitted letters of comments (from Korean companies) via the Indian TBT Enquiry Point for 10 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 709 . 11 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 710 . G/TBT/M/85 - 7 - five times, in April, June, July, August, and September 2021, but we have not yet re ceived any reply from India. Firstly, we received news recently that the regulation will be enforced starting from 1 January 2022. Regarding this, we would like to ask India whether or not the UHD TV regulation will be enforced as mandatory or not, and the time schedule for its implementation. If India plans to implement the regulation as mandatory, we request India to notify the WTO TBT Committee in accordance with Article 2.9 of the WTO TBT Agreement, allowing a period of at least 60 days for comments fro m other WTO Members and providing a transition period of at least six months after its adoption. 2.20. Secondly, most countries, such as the EU and Korea, apply the Standby Power Consumption Standard Values by separating them into Standby Active mode and Standby Passive mode, depending on whether or not the device is in a network connection. However, India's UHD TV regulation has set the sum of both the Standby Active mode power consumption and the Standby Passive mode power consumption as the maximum limit in de termining conformity of Standby Power Consumption. If the regulation becomes mandatory, this excessive requirement is highly likely to act as an unnecessary trade barrier for exporters to India. Therefore, we request India to revise the Regulation's Standb y Power Consumption requirement in line with international practice and apply reasonable figures for maximum limits of Standby Active mode and Standby Passive mode separately. Lastly, we would like to ask India to provide answers to our past enquiries, whi ch were sent to the Indian TBT Enquiry Point earlier, about the scope of regulated products. 2.21. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. A standard and labelling programme for colour televisions with screen resolution up to 1 ,920 x 1,080 pixels (called Full HD or FHD resolution) was launched in 2009. Subsequently, the programme has been mandated since 2016. While a new technology commercially known as Ultra -High Definition (UHD) television was available in the market for the l ast few years, and this technology was not covered under the existing Bureau of Energy Efficiency's programme for televisions, UHD televisions have a much higher pixel count than televisions with screen resolution up to 1,920 x 1,080 pixels, and it was found that they consume more energy than HD or FHD televisions. The Star rating program for Ultra - High Definition (UHD) televisions of 4K and 8K screen resolution is based on Annual Energy consumption (AEC) of the appliance in accordance with IEC 62087:2015 e dition 1. Also, Bureau of Energy Efficiency has reviewed the International labelling programme of UHD television for other countries and regions like the European Union, United States and China before formulating the Standards for India. The programme cove rs Ultra -High Definition (UHD) televisions of Liquid Crystal Display with LED backlighting, OLED displays, QLED displays, Micro -LED displays, that may be utilized to make and sell UHD televisions in the Indian market having a native resolution of 3,840 x 2,160 pixels (4K) and 7,680 x 4,320 pixels (8K) which can be powered only by an external power supply at a voltage not exceeding 250 V ac, 50 Hz being manufactured, imported and commercially purchased or sold in India. This programme expects a cumulative en ergy savings of 9.75 TWh (Billion Units of Electricity) and a corresponding 8 million tonnes (MT) CO2 emissions mitigation by FY 2030. The programme for UHD televisions, 4K and 8 K screen resolution, has been launched in a voluntary mode initially for a pe riod of one year from 1 January 2021 till 31 December 2021. 2.1.2.8 Sri Lanka - National Environmental (Plastic Material Identification Standards) Regulations No. 01 of 2021 (ID 71112) 2.22. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. On 21 January 2021, the Minister of Environment published in the Gazette of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the National Environmental (Plastic Material Identification Standards) Regulations No. 01 of 2021 (PMI Regulation). Sri Lanka has not yet notified this PMI Regulation to the WTO TBT Committee. We understand that, as currently drafted, the PMI Regulation introduces labelling requirements for any manufactured plastic item. Between June and August 2021, US industry and the United States Govern ment submitted comments on the PMI Regulation to Sri Lanka highlighting concerns regarding the lack of clear scope, the absence of a timeline for implementation, and the lack of clarity and feasibility of the labelling requirements. We request that Sri Lan ka please confirm the status of the PMI Regulation. Specifically, is this regulation finalized or will Sri Lanka continue to engage in stakeholder consultations prior to finalization and implementation? We would also appreciate clarification from Sri Lanka on whether the scope of the PMI Regulation includes all plastic inputs and plastic packaging, or if the labelling requirements apply solely to final product plastic items. We reiterate our August 2021 request that Sri Lanka use relevant international stan dards, or 12 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 711 . G/TBT/M/85 - 8 - relevant parts of them, for plastic material identification, including those commonly used to regulate plastic packaging, as the basis for any implementing measures for this regulation. For example, ASTM D7611/D7611M and DIN 6120 are widely accep ted standards for plastic packaging used by industry on a global basis. 2.23. US industry has noted that applying the PMI Regulation's labelling requirement to every single plastic part in a product or packaging is unfeasible. Countless products contain many dif ferent plastic parts and/or plastic parts that may be too small to label. For example, laptops contain as many as 300 plastic parts and desktop computers contain more than 500 plastic parts. US industry has stressed that labelling very small plastic parts – for example, those weighing less than 25 grammes or having a surface area less than 50 square centimetres – would not only be illegible, costly, and overly burdensome but could also disrupt product functionality. Such small plastic parts are also not typically collected for recycling. Does Sri Lanka envision exempting small plastic parts from its labelling regime? We note that, as currently drafted, the PMI Regulation does not provide clear guidance on how manufacturers should label products or packaging containing plastic. For example, while the measure lists recycling marks for various types of plastics, it does not provide guidance on sizing, placement, colour, the manner in which such marks should be printed or affixed to products and/or packaging, or information on how conformity with the PMI Regulation will be assessed. Does Sri Lanka intend to provide such additional guidance? We request that Sri Lanka clarify the effective date of the PMI Regulation. We understand that US industry has recommended th at Sri Lanka consider a two -year transition period. Given the broad scope of the PMI Regulation, we encourage Sri Lanka to provide reasonable transition periods for industry to conform to the new requirements, in accordance with Sri Lanka's WTO TBT commitm ents. 2.24. In response, the representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement. We have duly noted concerns expressed by the United States on Sri Lanka's regulation especially with regard to its scope, the timeline for implementation, the clarity and feasibility of the labelling requirements and notification to the WTO. We understand that the United States has already been communicating with our national authorities, in particular with Sri Lanka's WTO TBT Enquiry Point flagging some of these specific concerns. My delegation has already had few information exchanges with the delegation of the United States and in order to better understand the concerns under reference. We wish to place on record our sincere appreciation to the US delegation in Geneva on the attentive nature and promptness at which it shared all the pertinent documentation. During the scrutiny of the correspondence between the two TBT Enquiry Points of the US and Sri Lanka, it revealed that there has been a possible communication breakdow n, which may have prompted the US delegation to reiterate its concerns. 2.25. Due to the very long lockdowns imposed by Sri Lanka to contain the spread of COVID -19 pandemic, most of the institutions were operating with a very minimal staff mainly to focus only o n all COVID -19 related facilitation measures. This may have been the most possible reason as to why our authorities have not been able to respond in a timely manner. However, my delegation has already made our national authorities aware of the concerns exp ressed by the United States, including sharing the copies of correspondence had between the two TBT Enquiry Points of the US and Sri Lanka, and we expect a formal request from our capital shortly. Accordingly, my delegation will continue to engage with the United States bilaterally in order to address their concerns, including a possible notification of the measures to be made to the WTO TBT Committee. 2.1.2.9 Brazil - MAPA Ordinance No. 208, 26 February 2021 – revision of the Decree No. 6.87 of 4 June 2009 on the standardisation, classification, registration, inspection, production and supervision of alcoholic beverages, G/TBT/N/BRA/1145 (ID 71213) 2.26. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to ask Brazil about the state of play of the notified revision of the Decree No 6.87 on alcoholic beverages and to note it still has not received a reply to the written comments of 29 April 2021. The EU producers are particularly concerned with setting of a maximum limit of alcohol content for distilled alcoholic beverages, the definition of whisky, requirements on the ageing and sweetening for rum, requirements for vodka and liqueurs and components allowed for the production of gin and the generic use of the EU geographical indications of "Ca lvados" and "Cognac". All these elements 13 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 712 . G/TBT/M/85 - 9 - would constitute significant barriers to trade. The European Union would appreciate a reply to the written comments and is prepared to work bilaterally with Brazil with regard to the ongoing revision. 2.27. In response, t he representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Ordinance No. 208 of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA) of Brazil, issued on 26 February, is a call for contributions regarding the revision of the Decree No. 6.871 of 2009. This decree applies to the standardization, classification, registration, inspection, production and supervision of alcoholic beverages. This call for contributions is a step prior to a public consultation. As such, there are still no draft texts fo r countries to comment on. Brazil is willing to receive countries' feedback on the best ways to improve current regulatory stock applicable to alcoholic beverages. We invite all interested parties to present technical elements that will substantiate the dr afting of a new regulation to be subsequently submitted for public consultation, in accordance with our obligations under the TBT Agreement. A call for contributions is an extra step in terms of transparency and stakeholder engagement, following provisions of Article 2.9.1 of the TBT Agreement. Since there are no text proposals so far, we understand that the alleged concerns mentioned by the European Union are somewhat unwarranted. All of the comments received during this call for contributions will be duly taken into account. 2.1.2.10 Belgium - Draft law introducing additional security measures for the provision of mobile 5G services, G/TBT/N/BEL/44 (ID 71314) 2.28. The representative of China provided the following statement. China thanks Belgium for making a notification to this Committee, and als o the EU for the reply to China's comments. China recognizes that WTO Members are legitimately entitled to protect the security of their 5G network. However, the relevant laws, regulations and technical standards shall be adopted and applied in a manner co nsistent with the principles of non -discrimination, fairness and transparency and on the basis of objective facts and evidence. The laws, regulations and technical standards with regard to cybersecurity shall by no means constitute unjustified discriminati on or a disguised restriction on international trade. In addition, any party affected by the Draft Law shall be afforded adequate remedies. 1. For EU's reply point 1.A. of Article 105, §4 : "It is recommended to use objective and product -based technical sta ndards for risk assessment ", China thinks these criteria do not only comprise technical criteria but primarily discretionary (geo -political) issues. Moreover, the law stipulates that the fulfillment of only one criterion may justify a prohibition. Hence, t he technical criteria are not decisive and thus the concern has not been resolved as the decision is not based on objective and product -based technical standards. 2. For EU's reply point 1. B.: "It is recommended to clarify certain concepts and specify the scope of subjects to which the risk assessment criteria apply ", China could not find a definition of "supplier" under Article 105, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 of the notified draft. It might be a wrong reference for there is no definition of "supplier". In this regard, it is recommended that Belgium comply with Article 2.4 of the TBT Agreement by using technical standards that are based on internationally recognized standards to objectively evaluate the product security, or by using certification methods th at are based on international standards to assess the product security, instead of applying a high -risk vendor model primarily based on non - technical criteria. 2.29. 3. For EU's reply point 1. C.: "it is recommended to specify the procedures to revoke the identif ication of HRV ". This article only prohibits or restricts mobile network operators from using 5G equipment or services supplied by HRVs in a broad way. However, the notification does not specify whether and how high -risk suppliers can be revoked from the i dentification. EU's answers did not address our questions on "how to lift the HRV", more importantly, the answer did not address "to what extent and how the HRVs are prohibited". "As such, the EU would like to clarify that it is always possible to file a n ew application if the situation has changed." This is not a remedy but as the EU states, a new application which only may result in another decision if the situation has changed. By contrast, it is not a measure to achieve a revision of the decision under the same circumstances. "Ministers concerned can always decide to review the case". This is only at the discretion of the ministers and no formal remedy for the supplier/vendor or MNO concerned. Hence, it does not comply with the rule of law requiring an e ffective remedy. 2.30. For Article 105, §4, al.4, it is recommended to adopt a fact -based, objective, and fair risk assessment criteria. The risk assessment criteria set out in this article of the notified law are discriminatory and vague, some of which constit ute discrimination against non -EU vendors. For 14 For previous statement s follow the thread under ID 713 . G/TBT/M/85 - 10 - instance, the first provision as regards "the extent of interference to the vendor from non -EU country" discriminates against the nationality of 5G equipment and service providers from non -EU member States. "W hether reached data protection agreements or security agreements with the EU" as a factor in the risk assessment of suppliers constitutes discrimination against suppliers from Members that have not reached data security or protection agreements with the EU . China thinks it is not consistent with non -discrimination requirements in the TBT Agreement. In this regard, China suggests that the subjective risk assessment criteria for suppliers in the draft notification could be revised to objective criteria based on facts and industry consensus, carry out supply chain security certification (e.g. AEO certification, TAPA Certification and C -TPAT Certification), review vendors' history records in security compliance, establish security guidance for vendors and requir e vendors to make security guarantees. 2.31. For Article 105, §5, it is recommended to give reasons for being identified as HRVs and provide reasonable remedies. This article allows 5G network equipment operators to defend against the preliminary results of the risk assessment and also regulates that BIPT may, but is not required to, participate in the hearing requested by the applicant on the outcome of the assessment. The ri ght to request a hearing does only apply to MNOs and there is no possibility for the vendors to be formally heard although they are directly affected. Consequently, this is not an effective remedy. As the risk assessment objects are suppliers of 5G equipme nt or services, it is recommended to provide the suppliers of 5G equipment or services with remedies, require the competent authorities to explain the reasons and evidence for the risk assessment results, and allow the suppliers to defend against the risk assessment results. 2.32. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. China submitted written comments to which the EU replied on 8 November 2021. Generally, the EU would like to clarify that the notified draft's risk assessment criteria are based on the factors set out in point 2.37 of the EU coordinated risk assessment and recommended in the EU 5G Cybersecurity Toolbox, which has been agreed by all EU member States. Further details and explanations are given in the EU 's written reply to China, which was submitted on 8 November 2021. The notified draft is expected to be adopted imminently. 2.1.2.11 United States - Protecting Against National Security Threats to the Communications Supply Chain through the Equipment Authorization Program and the Competitive Bidding Program, G/TBT/N/USA/1771 (ID 71415) 2.33. The representative of China provided the following statement. China thanks US for notifying this document to the TBT Committee. China sent our comments on 18 September, and hopes to get reply from the US as soon as possible. The draft only targets five Chinese enterprises and identi fies Chinese products as security threats without referring to any technical standards and measurement, which is not consistent with the TBT Agreement. 1. For the new provision 47 CFR 2.903, it is recommended to revoke this provision. The added provision 4 7 CFR 2.903 prohibits the authorization of certain telecommunications equipment and services under provision 47 CFR 1.50002, which lists only five Chinese companies. It violates non -discriminatory principles in the TBT Agreement. There China recommends to revoke this provision. 2. For Section III.A of the draft regulations, it is recommended to provide technical standards that determine the national security threats, and that the FCC shall authorize the products that comply with the safety technical standar ds. The draft regulations prohibit the authorization of certain telecommunications equipment and services under provision 47 CFR 1.50002, on account of national security threats. Without a public technical standard and measurement index, the fact that the United States deems products of Chinese enterprises to have security threats is not consistent with TBT transparency principles. It is recommended to provide technical standards and measurement index, and notify to WTO, moreover, to provide the opportuniti es to other WTO Members to make comments. 3. For section III.A.3 of the draft regulations, it seeks comments on whether to revoke any of the authorizations that have been previously granted for "covered" equipment on the Covered List (47 CFR 1.50002). It i s proposed not to revoke the authorizations. Currently, the equipment authorizations that have been previously granted strictly followed the then -effective regulations, TCB -certified by the FCC, or SDOC process prescribed by the FCC. There is no violation of the situations mentioned in provision 2.939 of section III.A.3. 15 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 714. G/TBT/M/85 - 11 - 2.34. In response, the representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States notified the proposed rule, "Protecting Against National Security Threats to the Communications Supply Chain Through the Equipment Authorization Program and the Competitive Bidding Program," to the WTO on 3 September 2021. This action is a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in which the FCC proposes to revise rules related to its equipment authorization processes to prohibit authorization of any "covered" equipment on the recently established Covered List, included in PUBLIC LAW 116 –124 Secure and Trusted Communications Network s Act of 2019, enacted by US Congress 12 March 2020.16 The FCC accepted formal comments on the notification until 18 October 2021, and China's comments were submitted on 18 September 2021. In total, the FCC has received nearly 250 comments, including from China. All of the comments are available to the public and can be found on the FCC's website.17 United States appreciates China for its comments. The final rule will include information on all substantive comments received, and how the comments were taken into account. Information on any rule changes will be notified to the WTO as an addendum to the original notification. 2.1.2.12 Pakistan - Safety of amusement rides and amusement devices, G/TBT/N/PAK/164, G/TBT/N/PAK/165, G/TBT/N/PAK/166 (ID 71518) 2.35. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. We appreciate Pakistan's notification on 9 February 2021, to the WTO TBT Committee of three measures concerning the safety of design, manufacture, operation, use, and inspection of amusement parks and amusement devices, contained in G/TBT/N/PAK/164 , G/TBT/N/PAK/165 , and G/TBT/N/PAK/166 . In April 2021, the US Government and US industry submitted com ments via the US Enquiry Point in response to these measures. Does Pakistan intend to respond to substantive concerns? We understand that, through these measures, Pakistan will adopt and apply ISO standards to amusement rides and amusement devices. We reit erate our earlier comments, which highlighted US industry's concerns that these measures may lead to the exclusive use in Pakistan of the ISO standards and exclude use of other widely -used international standards for this particular sector, such as ASTM In ternational standards. According to US industry, exclusive use of ISO standards would require manufacturers and suppliers to make expensive and unique customizations for the Pakistan market, resulting in limited price and design options. As noted in our co mments, many US and international manufacturers and suppliers currently design to ASTM F24 standards, which are accepted in many foreign markets; are updated frequently; and include specifications for inflatables, trampolines, hybrid rides, and water slide s, which ISO standards do not currently cover. 2.36. Can Pakistan clarify whether it will also recognize ASTM International standards when importing rides, attractions, or equipment in the amusement rides and other devices sector? We note that there is nothing that prevents a WTO Member from considering more than one international standard to serve as the basis for a technical regulation. We encourage Pakistan to recognize rides, attractions, or equipment for which design, manufacture, operation, and use have be en tested and inspected in compliance with ASTM International's F24 standards and not subject such products to further in -country testing. Finally, we encourage Pakistan to provide a six -month transition period between the publication of the adopted measur es and their entry into force in accordance with Pakistan's WTO TBT commitments, to allow industry to comply with these measures. 2.37. In response, the representative of Pakistan provided the following statement. Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority the PSQCA in its process to adopt National Standards has considered more than one international standard such as ISO, IEC, OIML, and ASTM International. More specifically, the Technical Committee for "Amusement Rides and Amusement Devices" considered both the ISO and ASTM International Standards. After careful review of these two international standards, the Technical Committee concluded that the ISO standards were the most appropriate to achieve the objectives as they cover both the "Uses" and "Safety" of amusement rides and amusement devices. At the same time, we wish to thank the United States for their encouragement and wish to inform that Pakistan continues to consider ASTM International F24 Standards and other standards related to amusement rides and amusement devices in the relevant 16 Public Law No: 116 -124 (03/12/2020) Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019. 17 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs (ET Docket No, 21 -232). 18 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 715 . G/TBT/M/85 - 12 - Technical Committee of the PSQCA. These will be incorporated in the technical regulations whenever found relevant. 2.1.2.13 United States - Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures, G/TBT/N/USA/1748 (ID 71619) 2.38. The represe ntative of China provided the following statement. The standby mode power measurement of metal halide lamp should be changed from IEC 62301:2011 to IEC 63103:2020. 2.39. In response, the representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States appreciates the comments submitted by China on 13 September 2021, responding to our 15 July 2021 notification to the WTO to amend Department of Energy's Energy Conservation Program test procedures for metal halide lamp fixtures. The United Sta tes will take into consideration all comments received during the open comment period and respond to each substantive comment in the next published rulemaking document on the Test Procedures for Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures. 2.1.2.14 India - Chemical Fibers and Yarns : PSY, IDY, FDY, POY, PSF, and SMF for use in Cement -Based Matrix (Quality Control) Orders, 2020, G/TBT/N/IND/185, G/TBT/N/IND/188, G/TBT/N/IND/189, G/TBT/N/IND/190, G/TBT/N/IND/192, G/TBT/N/IND/194 (ID 71720) 2.40. The repr esentative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Regarding India's six Quality Control Orders (QCOs) for Chemical Fibers and Yarns (PSY, IDY, FDY, POY, PSF, and SMF) notified to the WTO on February 2021 as G/TBT/N/IND/185 , G/TBT/N/IND/188 , G/TBT/N/IND/189 , G/TBT/N/IND/190 , G/TBT/N/IND/192 and G/TBT/N/IND/194 , Korea submitted comments concerning the enforcement dates in August 2021. In res ponse, the Indian Government provided an additional grace period until April 2022, partially resolving the difficulties for Korean companies, and Korea fully appreciates the Indian government for its kind efforts. We respect the efforts of India to introdu ce Chemical Fibers QCOs for the health and safety of the Indian people. Furthermore, Korean companies are committed to complying with the regulation of India. However, we would like to deliver requests as Korean companies still have unresolved technical di fficulties regarding the six QCOs. Firstly, we have difficulty complying with the regulations as detailed test procedures and the attachment location for the ISI Mark have not been notified. Therefore, we request India to provide clear information on the t echnical regulations. 2.41. Secondly, the notified BIS regulations deviate from international standards. Unlike other countries such as the United States and Germany, which have unified systems of issuing certificates after testing at local laboratories, India's regulations require products to be tested twice, including local audits and designated laboratory tests, increasing the burden of certification to the industry. Therefore, we request India unify the product testing procedures to tests conducted by BIS certification agencies and exempt local on -site audits. Third, despite a simple classification only in the manufacturing process, POY, FDY, and IDY are regulated separately, causing unnecessary burdens in certification. Because these three products share the same properties and the composition of raw materials, we request India consider integrating them as one unified regulatory item of PF, Polyester Filaments. Lastly, after BIS certification, redundant administrative procedures occur in the process of attachi ng the ISI mark, resulting in excessive certification cost compared to other certifications in general. Therefore, we ask India to mitigate the relevant procedures by recognizing BIS certification numbers declared in shipping documents in substitute of ISI mark attachments. 2.42. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. Extension of QCOs for PSY, IDY, FDY, POY, PSF, and SMF for use in Cement -Based Matrix (Quality Control) Orders, 2020 has been issued on 8 October 2021 and will co me into force on completion of six months from date of its publication in the Gazette of India. 19 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 716 . 20 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 717 . G/TBT/M/85 - 13 - 2.1.2.15 Egypt – Halal Certification Measure, based on Egyptian Standard ES 4249/2014 General Requirements for Halal Food According to Islamic Sharia (ID 71821) 2.43. The repr esentative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States understands that Egypt is implementing changes to its halal certification requirements but has not shared written documentation of these changes nor notified any changes to the WTO. According to the diplomatic note received from the Egypt Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 12 September 2021, effective 1 August 2021, Egypt is no longer allowing halal certification bodies other than a single Egyptian company to certify halal produ cts for export to Egypt. The United States would like to note that we and other Members have successfully used multiple halal certification bodies to meet Egypt's halal conformity assessment requirements for many years. Could the Government of Egypt please explain why it is no longer willing to accept these certification bodies? We understand that when the Ministry of Agriculture delisted all US -based certifiers for beef and poultry in 2019, the sole Egyptian certifier raised certification fees by 1000%, re sulting in higher costs for US exporters and higher food prices for Egyptian consumers. The United States has also been verbally informed by the Government of Egypt that it is planning to expand the scope of products that require halal certification as a c ondition of import, despite Egypt's current importation of halal products without certification. To date, the United States has not received written notice of any proposed regulation, including the product scope, or proposed timeline for the halal technica l regulation that Egypt may propose. In the absence of any written, official notices from the Government of Egypt, the confusion resulting from these unofficial, opaque proposed changes has already significantly disrupted US trade to Egypt. While the Unite d States recognizes Egypt's right to require appropriate halal certification, we expect Egypt to fully meet its WTO obligations. The United States strongly urges Egypt to immediately pause implementation of any new certification requirements related to hal al until all WTO obligations have been met. 2.44. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to express its concerns with regard to the new requirements on halal certification as of 1 October 2021 bas ed on the Egyptian Halal standard 4249/2014. The EU industry is worried about negative impact this measure would have on food and beverages imports to Egypt. The EU regrets that Egypt did not notify the measure in its draft stage to this Committee and did not give the WTO Members an opportunity to submit comments. The EU would like to thank Egypt for useful bilateral contacts and welcomes some of the steps envisaged to mitigate the negative impact, such as the grace period until 15 December 2021 during whic h certification by IS EG Halal will be voluntary and for free. Nevertheless, this facilitation would only be temporary, and the companies will not have sufficient time to adapt to the new certification and labelling requirements. This is why the EU would u rge Egypt to postpone the implementation of this measure and to provide for a reasonable adaptation time of at least six months in accordance with Article 2.12 of the TBT Agreement. 2.45. The EU would also like to invite Egypt to reconsider the decision to gran t the right to certify the compliance with halal requirements to a single company, IS EG Halal, and to provide for a halal certification system that would allow multiple, well -established certification entities, in accordance with the international best pr actices. Re -certification by IS EG Halal of products from establishments already certified by other companies would lead to longer time to market and higher costs for consumers, while Egypt is suffering food security problems, aggravated by the coronavirus pandemic. The EU would also like to ask Egypt to consider keeping the Halal certification and labelling voluntary, in order to pursue the legitimate objective of ensuring reliable information without unduly hindering trade flows. The consumers should be a ble to decide whether to buy halal -certified food or not, based on clear labelling. Finally, the EU invites Egypt to provide more information about the new measure, including detailed description of the certification procedure, its duration and cost, and the product coverage, and comply with the notification obligations under the WTO TBT Agreement. 2.46. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada joins the United States, the European Union and other intervening Members to signal its con cerns with Egypt's new halal certification requirements for all imported food and beverage products which came into effect as of 1 October 2021. While Canada supports Egypt's objective to ensure that Egyptian consumers are confident that they are buying an d consuming Halal -certified products, Canada is deeply concerned that Egypt failed to notify the WTO TBT Committee of this new measure to provide Members and stakeholders the required period of at least 60 days to review the measure and provide comments. I n addition, as per Egypt's obligations under the TBT Agreement, a reasonable amount 21 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 718 . G/TBT/M/85 - 14 - of time, understood as a period of not less than six (6) months, should be provided between the publication of a regulation and its entry into force to allow time for indus try and Members to review and implement the new requirements. This has obviously not been the case with this measure. Canada is also concerned that the lack of specifics and/or documentation regarding the implementation of the measure has created an unpred ictable trading environment for our exporters. Based on the very limited information gathered to date, the halal certification requirements imposed by Egypt could be overly burdensome, unjustified, costly and more trade restrictive than necessary to achiev e Egypt's objective. We strongly encourage Egypt to have an open and transparent discussion with trading partners to share information, further clarify the requirements under this new measure and consider the impact it may have on trade prior to its implem entation. Specifically, we request that Egypt notify this measure to the WTO, pursuant to Egypt's transparency obligations, and provide trading partners and stakeholders with the opportunity to review and comment. Until then, we respectfully request that E gypt suspend the implementation of the measure. 2.47. The representative of New Zealand provided the following statement. New Zealand welcomes the opportunity to speak in support of the concerns raised by the European Union, Canada, and the United States. We thank Egypt for its bilateral engagement to date on this issue. New Zealand understa nds that Egypt is implementing changes under Prime Ministerial Decree (No. 35/2020) to require that certification of relevant halal standard(s) shall only be undertaken by IS EG Halal. Certification from other Halal assurance bodies will not be accepted fo r goods imported into Egypt. New Zealand also understands that the measures will apply to a broad category of food and drink products imported into Egypt, irrespective of whether Halal labelling is applied to these goods, and irrespective of whether these goods have previously been treated as Halal, for example, fresh fruit, vegetables, milk and other dairy products that do not include any other ingredients or additives. New Zealand has serious concerns with these measures. New Zealand would draw Egypt's at tention to its WTO obligations, including its obligations under the TBT Agreement concerning the use of conformity assessments, including under Articles 5 and 6, and the requirement that measures not be more trade restrictive than necessary. New Zealand wo uld like to better understand what consideration Egypt has accorded to less trade -restrictive alternatives. We are also interested in what factors led Egypt to introduce a measure that only allows conformity with the relevant Halal standard(s) to be determ ined by a single commercial body, and requires Halal certification of products, which have commonly been treated as Halal. New Zealand further notes that Egypt is yet to notify the certification procedure to the TBT Committee in accordance with Article 5.6 .2 of the TBT Agreement. We request that the new measures be suspended until all WTO obligations, including those requiring consultation with other WTO Members, have been met. 2.48. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile supports the STC recently raised by the countries that took the floor before it. Chile is concerned about Egypt's communication in which it is reported that ISEG Halal is the only establishment authorized to issue halal certificates. A further matter of concern is the lack of alternatives for certifying products, such as agreements between ISEG Halal and certification entities in third countries, given that Chile is home to internationally recognized certification centres that could be recognized by Egypt, thereby avoi ding the creation of unnecessary barriers to trade, which ultimately restricts bilateral trade. 2.49. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia recognizes Egypt's right to implement religious requirements to ensure that consumer s can identify and purchase products which meet their needs. Australia notes Egypt's obligations to implement measures which are no more trade restrictive than necessary, and to notify Members of proposed measures that may have a significant effect on othe r Members' trade and that are not based on relevant international standards. While Australia acknowledges and thanks Egypt for bilateral communication and engagement on the implementation of new halal certification requirements, we kindly request that details regarding the new requirements are notified to the TBT Committee and Members provided an opportunity to comment. In particular, Australia requests clear advice regarding the implementation timelines and scope of product coverage. Australia welcomes ong oing discussion on the implementation of Egypt's new halal certification measures and the opportunity to provide further comment through a formal TBT notification process. 2.50. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement. Argentina wishes t o convey its concern regarding the extension of the scope and new requirements of Egyptian Standard ES 4249/2014 General Requirements for Halal Foods According to Islamic Sharia, in order to extend, as of 1 October 2021, the IS EG Halal certification to al l imported food and beverages and not only to those products claiming to be halal. It is important to highlight that the extension of this measure G/TBT/M/85 - 15 - has not been officially published in a timely and appropriate manner, nor duly notified to the WTO, given tha t it is a regulation that creates higher burdens and costs for exporters. In this regard, exporting countries do not have clear and precise information on the measures and requirements that must be met. Nor do they have any information on the respective im plementation costs and periods. This situation leads to unpredictability for food and beverage exporting companies, which results in practice in the creation of unjustified obstacles to international trade. In addition, taking into consideration that the P rime Minister's Decree (No. 35/2020) gave responsibility for halal certification of all animal products imported into and exported from Egypt exclusively to IS EG Halal and the short deadlines reportedly set, significant delays in trade have already been c aused by the extensive goods verification processes at ports. We request Egypt to review the measure, while at the same time expecting it comply with the requirement to submit the measure to the WTO, so that Members can have rapid and official access to th e adopted regulation, including all the information on requirements, products covered, deadlines set, costs and any other additional details. 2.51. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. Paraguay shares Egypt's concern that consumers be provided with certainty regarding the purchase and consumption of Halal certified products, however, as a food exporter to Egypt, we continue to follow closely the implementation of this measure and the information that Egypt can give us about it. In that regard, we thank Egypt for the recent bilateral meeting in Geneva and we hope that Egypt can provide us with more information so that we can study it and its implications for Paraguay carefully. In addition to meat and other animal products, Paraguay expo rts other products of plant origin to Egypt, such as fruits, grains and derived products, for which the addition of or contact with food considered unlawful under Islamic law is highly unlikely and for which Halal certification and labelling will also mean a significant burden and additional cost. The apparent requirement for all food and beverages, even for those that do not claim to be Halal and the possible process required to obtain certification renders this measure more restrictive and costly than nec essary to achieve Egypt's goal. Paraguay therefore respectfully requests Egypt to notify the measure under the WTO transparency obligations and to continue the transparent process of information exchange and dialogue with the Members concerned, in order to provide the necessary information and to respond to Members' comments so that this measure is not more burdensome and restrictive than necessary. With respect to the certification and labelling obligation, even for those products that do not claim to be H alal, we request Egypt to confirm this requirement and to consider keeping certification on a voluntary basis in order to meet the legitimate requirement to provide accurate information to consumers without it becoming a trade restriction. 2.52. In response, the representative of Egypt provided the following statement. We thank the Members with which we had some fruitful bilateral discussions. Given the extensive comments made yesterday, I really regret the fact that we are still following up with capital on this matter. We take note of all the comments received today and will convey them to capital and come back with concrete answers to concerned delegations in due course. 2.1.2.16 India - Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2021 (ID 71922) 2.53. The representative of t he Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea respects and strongly supports India's efforts to introduce the Plastic Waste Management Rules for the protection of the environment and the safety of its people. Furthermore, Korean companies ar e fully committed to complying with India's regulations. However, Korean companies have concerns regarding the "Plastic Waste Management (Amendment) Rules, 2021" published in the Gazette of India on 12 August 2021, so Korea shall present the following comm ents. Firstly, with regard to this amendment, Korea requests India to notify the WTO so as to provide the WTO Members with a comment period of more than 60 days, and to grant a sufficient grace period so that the affected industry can comply with the relev ant regulation. This amendment should have been notified to WTO Members and should have allowed a reasonable time for WTO Members to make comments. But as the Amendment came into force without WTO TBT notification and without any grace period, the new requ irements are quite burdensome for the affected industries. Secondly, we request an exception to labelling requirement on plastic packaging from regulation when using imported plastic packaging, regardless of whether it is used for imported products or dome stic products. Imported packaging materials do not have registration numbers in India, and therefore, it is impossible to comply with labelling requirements such as manufacturer name, producer name, registration number, etc. With Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE products) in particular, it is difficult to 22 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 719 . G/TBT/M/85 - 16 - comply with the labelling requirements and to manage the packaging material registration number itself, due to the use of packaging materials from multiple companies even on the same model, frequen t packing company changes, and packing sometimes taking place in India with imported plastic packaging. Under the Amendment Rules, "multilayered packaging used for imported goods" is excluded from the labelling requirement. Accordingly, we request India to kindly consider exempting "imported plastic packaging" as well. 2.54. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. Since the statement was uploaded rather late and we did not have the full gist of the question, the response now is well as we are able to dispatch. The Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, provides the statutory framework for plastic waste management in India. Rule 4 of the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, provide for minimum thickness requirement for plastic car ry bags and plastic sheets used in packaging and Rule 9 casts Extended Producer Responsibility on Producers, Importers and Brand Owners for environmentally sound management of plastic packaging introduced in the market along with the products. The marking and labelling requirement on plastic packaging under Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2021, is not discriminatory and is not a barrier to international trade. The requirements are applicable in a uniform manner to both domestic and international c ompanies. Such marking and labelling requirements have also been put by other countries / regional groupings such as the European Union. 2.1.2.17 Sri Lanka - Imports (Standardization and Quality Control) Regulations 2017, G/TBT/N/LKA/36 (ID 72023) 2.55. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement. The Government of Indonesia intends to request further clarification from the Government of Sri Lanka regarding the policy of prohibiting the import of palm oil as contained in the Operating Instruction of the Sri Lanka Export and Import Supervision Department No. 8/2021 which has been updated with Operating Instruction No. 9/2021 dated 12 April 2021. In this policy, crude palm oil products are categorized into a list of products that are prohibited from being imported bec ause the Sri Lankan government does not know how to deal with the issue of micro -toxin contamination as a result of the actions of importers who are deemed to have acted unethically by bringing crude palm oil to the market by claiming it as refined palm oi l and mixing it with coconut oil. Sri Lanka is a major producer of coconut oil products, and in recent years there has been an increase in imports and consumption of palm oil which is seen as detrimental to domestic producers and smallholders. Thus, the Sr i Lankan government issued a prohibition policy to make Sri Lanka free from palm oil plantations and free from palm oil consumption. The implementation of the prohibition policy has had a direct impact on the export of palm oil products to Sri Lanka, espec ially from Indonesia and this affects the livelihoods of small palm oil farmers in Indonesia and has a systemic impact on the global palm oil trade. Indonesia is of the view that the prohibition policy is a form of discrimination and is not permitted under WTO provisions and has the potential to create unnecessary barriers to international trade. 2.56. The Indonesian government appreciates the Sri Lankan government's step in notifying the policy to the WTO's Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee through the G/TBT/N/LKA/36 document, an d for that Indonesia asks for clarification which has been sent to Sri Lanka's inquiry point and to date have not received a response or answer. In this regard, Indonesia hopes that the Sri Lankan government can immediately provide responses and answers re garding the clarification referred to, and if there is a renewal of the policy, it can immediately notify the WTO TBT Committee and can explain further regarding rationality, administration, objectives, duration of policy implementation and the basis for t he scientific justification of the policy. The Indonesian government hopes that Sri Lanka will be able to review the implementation of the palm oil import ban policy and use other alternative policy instruments that are permitted and in line with the appli cable provisions in the WTO, such as through the implementation of technical standards/regulations to ensure the quality of imported palm oil products. 2.57. In response, the representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement. My delegation would like to note that the subject matter has also been raised at the Committee on Import Licensing held on 8 October, Committee on Market Access held on 11 October and Council on Trade in Goods held on 1 November, where Sri Lanka responded to the concerns expressed by Indonesia substantially. Today we understand that Indonesia has specific concerns with regard to Sri Lanka's notification to the TBT Committee No. G/TBT/N/LKA/36 dated 28 May 2018. Through this 23 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 720 . G/TBT/M/85 - 17 - notification, Sri Lanka has notified its Imports Standardization and Quality Control R egulations of 2017, which was introduced through the Extraordinary Gazette of Sri Lanka No. 2064/34 dated 29 March 2018. This regulation governs the Compulsory Import Inspection Scheme of Sri Lanka operated by Sri Lanka Standards Institution. Under the Com pulsory Import Inspection Scheme, importers are not permitted to import the specified 122 items listed in the Schedule -I of this regulation, including palm oil to Sri Lanka, unless they conform to the relevant Sri Lanka Standards and other related SPS Stan dards. 2.58. Sri Lanka Standards for main palm oil products are as follows: Palm Oil: SLS 720; Palm Olein: SLS 961; Palm Stearin: SLS 960. These related standards were first published in 1985 subject to the restrictions imposed under the Sri Lanka Food Act No. 2 6 of 1980 (and revisions framed thereunder) and subsequently have been subject to revisions, the latest revisions having been made in 2016 and 2017. In these revisions, quality requirements have been updated, including requirement for detection of heavy me tals and mycotoxins with the references to the latest methods of test. In revising these standards, the Codex Alimentarius Commission, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Anal ytical Chemists (AOAC), including the relevant Standard institutions of certain palm oil exporting countries have been consulted. In relation to the relevant Food (Mycotoxins) Regulations 2021, which stipulate the types of Mycotoxins with their respective maximum residual levels (MRLs) against all edible oils, including all forms of palm oils, have been framed based on European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 and its subsequent revisions, which set the maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. The EU Regulations have apparently been in conformity with the new information and developments in Codex Alimentarius Commission. Palm oil products falling under HS codes 1511.90.10, HS 1511.90.30 and HS 1511.90.90 can be import ed to Sri Lanka by obtaining an import licence from the Department of Import and Export Control with a fee of 0.4% of CIF Value. The principal set of procedures that relate to automatic and non -automatic licences are stipulated in the Regulation published in Extraordinary Gazette No. 1739/03 dated 2 January 2012. Sri Lanka has already notified this Regulation also to the WTO in 2014. Sri Lanka would like to further engage with Indonesia to address its concerns. 2.1.2.18 Guatemala - Technical Standard 84 -2021 for the Sanitary Registration of Repellent Products for External Use in Humans and Spatial Repellent Products (ID 72124) 2.59. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement. The delegation of Mexico refers to Technical Standard 84 – Sanitary Registratio n of Repellent Products for External Use in Humans and Spatial Repellent Products, the final version of which was published on 28 August this year on the website of the Department for the Regulation and Control of Pharmaceutical and Related Products of the Directorate -General of Health Regulation, Surveillance and Control at the Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare. The concerns regarding this regulation relate primarily to the principles of proportionality, use of international standards and transp arency under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. The Technical Standard in question requires toxicity studies for the sanitary registration of repellents for external use in humans. However, it does not clarify whether it will be possible to use existing or bridging toxicological studies on the formulations or whether new studies need to be carried out for each formulation, even where there is precedent. Flexibility in terms of allowing the use of existing information helps to reduce the number of studies to be carried out and, therefore, registration costs for importers, by limiting the requirement to conduct toxicity studies only to cases where there is a new ingredient in the formula. 2.60. Furthermore, in relation to the toxicity studies contained in Article 5.1 of the Technical Standard, we note that the studies required by Guatemala for sanitary registration could include animal testing, which tends to be prohibited around the world. Accordingly, we would be grateful if the delegation of Guatemala c ould share with us the technical and scientific evidence on which they based the final version of the Technical Standard so we can learn more about the justification behind it. In addition, contrary to the transparency requirements of this Committee, the T echnical Standard was not notified to the members of this Committee or subject to international public consultation, which prevented the Government of Mexico from presenting its comments and concerns regarding this technical regulation through official cha nnels. Mexico has contacted Guatemala and expressed its concerns in detail to those responsible for the technical barriers to trade agenda, via email and in an online bilateral meeting, in July and September, respectively, of this year. These concerns were not taken into consideration in the final version of the Technical Standard in question. In light 24 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 721 . G/TBT/M/85 - 18 - of this, the delegation of Mexico requests the good offices of the delegation of Guatemala to put the regulatory procedures related to Technical Standard 84 on hold in order to allow public consultations on this regulation and to facilitate and promote public -private sector dialogue in which the industry and the Government of Mexico can take part and express our concerns. The delegation of Mexico is grateful f or the opportunity to deliver this statement and for the consideration of the requests made therein. 2.61. In response, the representative of Guatemala provided the following statement. Guatemala welcomes the statement made by Mexico; we are awaiting a reply fro m the relevant authority. However, we will forward the details of Mexico's statement to the relevant authorities in our capital, so as to have an early response. 2.1.2.19 Canada – Regulatory requirements for the import and marketing of cannabis and cannabis based p roducts for medicinal use (ID 72225) 2.62. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia would like to express its concern regarding the difficulties noted in respect of the importation into Canada of cannabis and cannabis -based produ cts for medicinal use. We welcome the Canadian authorities' willingness to address my delegation's doubts and concerns within the context of bilateral dialogue. Canada is a leader in establishing progressive regulations on the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes. Canadian firms are key players in this growing and evolving market. Canada in fact has one of the most developed medicinal cannabis markets in the world, and is a recognized exporter of these products. Canada is also a significant investor in th is sector, and Colombia is one of the countries where considerable investment in the development of this industry has been recorded. Nevertheless, Colombian firms have encountered difficulties in exporting cannabis and cannabis - based products for medicinal – not recreational – use to Canada. In addition to general restrictions on the commercial importation of medicinal cannabis and difficulties obtaining marketing licences under Canadian legislation, Colombian firms have faced obstacles when seeking to obta in the certification required to market their products in this market. 2.63. According to Part 5 of the Cannabis Regulations under the Cannabis Act, the Canadian authorities require compliance with their own manufacturing standards known as "Good Production Practices" (GPP). These standards are only required in Canada, and Colombian exporters have not had access to them. In this regard, we would like to ask the Canadian authorities about Health Canada's requirements for granting GPP certification, both to Canadia n firms and to foreign firms: what exactly are these requirements? We would like some clarification as to whether any foreign firm meeting the requirements in the "Good production practices guide for cannabis", published by the Canadian authorities in June 2019, can obtain this certification. We would also like to ask the Canadian authorities whether they are able to recognize or approve the certificates of good manufacturing practices (GMP certificates) issued by the national authorities in Colombia. Lastl y, we would like some clarification as to whether a GMP certificate issued by an authority from another reference country, such as a member of the European Union, could be recognized or accepted for exports to Canada. 2.64. In response, the representative of Canada provided the following statement. The international control of drugs is regulated through the three UN Drug Conventions. Cannabidiol (CBD) is an internationally controlled substance under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (Single Convention ), as a preparation or extract/tincture of cannabis. Under the Single Convention, only the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) can agree to list or delist a controlled substance, upon receiving advice from the WHO and/or member states. The UN CND is a funct ional commission of ECOSOC and is the central drug policy -making body within the UN system. In late 2020, the CND reviewed and voted on WHO recommendations relating to cannabis. However, the majority of the recommendations, including those related to CBD, were not adopted. As a result, the status of CBD as a controlled substance under the UN drug conventions did not change. Consistent with its controlled status internationally, CBD is a controlled substance in Canada and is regulated under the Cannabis Act. The Cannabis Act and its regulations set out the restrictions pertaining to the import and export of cannabis. Only holders of licences issued by Health Canada under the Cannabis Regulations may import or export cannabis, and only for medical or scientifi c purposes. Under the Cannabis Act and its regulations, the import and export of cannabis for any other purpose (such as distribution or sale for non -medical purposes) is strictly prohibited. As outlined in Canada's Cannabis 25 For previous statement s follow the thread under ID 722 . G/TBT/M/85 - 19 - Import/Export Bulletin, authori zation of the import or export of cannabis for medical or scientific purposes is only granted in very limited circumstances, in a manner that is consistent with the public health and public safety objectives of the Cannabis Act and Canada's obligations und er international drug control treaties, to which Canada is a party. Before issuing an import permit, Health Canada considers whether there are risks to public health and public safety. More information on importation of cannabis and cannabis products for m edical use is available on Health Canada's website. 2.1.2.20 France - LOI n° 2020 -105: Anti -Waste Law for a Circular Economy (AGEC Law) (ID 72326) 2.65. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea respects and strongly supports France's efforts to introduce "Prohibition of Mineral Oils on Packaging" as a part of "Law No. 2020 -105: Anti -Waste Law for a Circular Economy" (the "AGEC Law") to protect the environm ent and facilitate recycling procedures. Furthermore, Korean companies are fully committed to complying with the regulations of France. Korean companies understand that the use of mineral oil in printing inks on packaging materials will be banned from Janu ary 2022, but there is not enough detailed information about the regulation, which makes it difficult for them to be in compliance. Therefore, we would like to present the following enquiries and requests. First, we request that France specify the regulate d substance list with the chemical substance name and CAS No., and specify the detailed range of packaging materials to be regulated, such as ink, box, plastic bag, etc., for clarification of the range of regulated substances. Second, we request a grace pe riod of one year after the announcement to enforce the regulation. This is because for finished product manufacturers, a regulatory response period of more than one year is required to investigate the use of regulated substances by ink manufacturers and pr inting companies, as well as to make improvement and ship the necessary substances. For this reason, we request that a grace period of 12 months or longer be applied after France provides the essential information for regulatory compliance. 2.66. In response, th e representative of the European Union provided the following statement. Law No. 2020 -105 of 10 February 2020 is a framework law and the basis for several implementing Decrees, which were notified to the WTO through separate TBT notifications. The question s and requests posed by Korea seem to relate to Article 112 of Law No. 2020 -105, which requires the adoption of an implementing decree. The Decree is still at a draft stage. The French TBT Enquiry Point intends to notify the Decree to the WTO in accordance with the TBT Agreement, which will provide sufficient time to discuss the matters raised by Korea. 2.1.2.21 Indonesia - Government Regulation 28 of 2021 – Implementing Regulation (for the Manufacturing/Industry Sector) to Law No. 11 of 2020 the "Job Creation Act" (ID 72427) 2.67. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States has concerns with the Government of Indonesia Regulation No. 28 of 2021, which is the Implementing Regulation (for the Manufacturing/Industry Sector) to Law No. 11 of 2020 of the "Job Creation Act" (GR28/2021). We ask that Indonesia halt implementation of the measure, notify the measure to this Committee, provide a 60 -day comment period for stakeholders, and take those comments into consideration before re issuing the measure. Specific concerns include that the measure appears to mandate conformity assessment bodies use Indonesian citizens domiciled in Indonesia for all conformity assessment. Such a requirement would effectively negate use of any current ove rseas inspection or testing bodies. We ask Indonesia for the justification for including the nationality and domicile of the personnel as a requirement for product conformity testing. Many industries obtain Indonesian national standards (SNI) certification by submitting product sampling for each shipment. Does this nationality and domicile requirement apply to product sampling collection in a foreign territory as well, such that if a shipment will be tested by an Indonesian conformity assessment body, sampl ing is required to be performed by Indonesian nationals domiciled in Indonesia travelling to the manufacturing site to collect the sample? If yes, with widespread travel restrictions still impacting much of the world, how does Indonesia envision companies complying with these requirements? Because Indonesia is not allowing for remote factory inspections, companies that rely on factory inspections to obtain SNI certification will also be impacted if they have to rely on pre -shipment testing. We are therefore concerned that requiring 26 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 723. 27 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 724 . G/TBT/M/85 - 20 - collection of product samples be done by Indonesian nationals domiciled in Indonesia will effectively halt imports, and in fact, already appears to be doing so. 2.68. We would also appreciate if Indonesia could clarify whether Article 3 8 of GR28/2021, which requires that conformity assessment bodies must also operate their own testing laboratories for all products required to be certified to SNIs. SNI requirements apply to a wide swath of product categories, and not all conformity assess ment bodies are likely to operate testing facilities for all categories. Industry stakeholders have reported that, in the absence of implementing regulations from the Ministry of Industry clarifying the requirements in GR 28/2021, many conformity assessmen t bodies have halted certification for foreign products, resulting in the halt of exports requiring SNI testing per shipment. As companies' SNI certifications based on factory inspection expire, those exports also will be impacted because there currently i s no means for foreign manufacturers to meet either requirement - factory inspections or pre -shipment product sampling. We ask that Indonesia urgently communicate to Indonesian conformity assessment bodies that certification of foreign product shipments ca n, and should, continue while the Ministry of Industry prepares the implementing regulations. We additionally request that Indonesia notify the implementing regulations to this Committee in draft form and allow for stakeholder comment and consideration of those comments prior to finalization. 2.69. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union is concerned by Regulation No. 28 of 2021 and new requirements for Indonesian National Standard (SNI) certification. In Febr uary 2021, the Government of Indonesia issued a Government Regulation No. 28/2021. This Regulation is one of the implementing regulations of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation (Law 11/2020) passed last year, both of them not notified. Government Regulation 28/2021 aims to increase the competitiveness of Indonesia's national industry and mainly outlines measures related to raw materials. It also introduces new requirements with regard to product certification bodies (Lspros). We understand that the new requirem ents affect in principle all products subject to SNI certification. Certain sectors appear to be particularly concerned. This is the case, for instance, with the toys sector. With regard to the toys sector, articles 38 and 39 create significant challenges. Article 38 prohibits Lspros from using third -party testing facilities, while article 39 stipulates that product certification bodies (Lspros) be Indonesian entities, employ Indonesian citizens, residents of Indonesia to assess product compliance to Indone sian National Standards. Regulatory bodies are now giving this article an overly strict literal interpretation as requiring that every step of the SNI certification be conducted by Indonesian nationals residing in Indonesia, and all the criteria just menti oned. We understand this is both required for scheme 1 (batch testing and pre-shipment inspection) and scheme 5 (factory certification). This new approach appears to be implemented despite no ministerial implementing regulation, which is normally required in the Indonesian regulatory process to implement a Government Regulation. 2.70. In terms of impact, this means that for batch testing and pre -shipment inspection, samples need to be taken by an employee of the certification body/Indonesian resident. Due to COVI D-19 restrictions, it is very difficult for Lspros to send personnel overseas to sample products or to conduct factory audits. As a result, all Lspros have either stopped overseas sampling or stopped overseas certification altogether. In addition, even whe n international travel would be easier, the new requirements will still add significant costs and delays. With regards to another sector, the tyre industry, we understand that they are also facing major problems. According to our information Indonesia is a pplying a mandatory certification system for certain spare parts (original and non - original) including tyres, safety glazing, rims, primary -batteries and audio/video -components. This implies the audit of the plant where the spare parts are produced (in acc ordance with ISO 9001) as well as an analysis of the products conducted by Indonesian test institute. This is followed by scheduled conformity of production audits. Currently the Indonesian test institute has suspended both the audit of the plants for new certifications, as well as the conformity assessment inspections. The result is that products requiring new certifications cannot be imported into Indonesia, and those products which already have a certification will be also banned from Indonesia when thei r respective certifications expire. 2.71. The European Union would like to understand what measures Indonesia is putting in place to ensure that EU spare parts can be smoothly imported into Indonesia. In addition, we would like to stress that EU products certifi ed in accordance with United Nations (UN) regulations under the 1958 Agreement have similar or higher levels of road safety and environmental protection performance than those certified in accordance with the Indonesian regulations. Therefore, the European Union would like to invite Indonesia to accept the EU spare parts bearing a UN marking or being G/TBT/M/85 - 21 - accompanied by an UN certificate. The European Union would like to propose extending the validity of issued Indonesian certificates until Indonesia can resume the conformity of production activities. Indonesia could also consider allowing the import of EU original parts, given that original parts have already proven their performance on vehicles in use in Indonesia. Finally, we would like to highlight that new S NI requirements have negative impact also on EU machinery industry. The European Union would like to invite Indonesia to take into account the concerns just mentioned. We remain available of course to discuss the issue also bilaterally as we did already. 2.72. In response, the representative of Indonesia provided the following statement. This Omnibus Law revised a number of important Articles from 77 existing Laws with job creation as its main purpose by improving "ease of doing business (EODB)". The implementing regulations of this Omnibus Law are aimed, among others, to simplify and harmonize investment regulations, to banish red tape, and to reform the investment licensing procedures with the improved risk -based Online Single Submission (OSS) system. Indonesia would like to inform that Government Regulation 28 of 2021 is aiming to clarify and complement the previous requirements set in Government Regulation (PP) 2/2017 regarding Development of Industrial Facilities and Infrastructure. Regarding provisions for co nformity assessment bodies to conduct SNI certification as regulated in Government Regulation No 28 of 2021, Indonesia is of the view that such provisions are a general requirement and will create no technical barriers to trade. Adoption of standard and co nformity assessment procedures into technical regulations are regulated through individual Ministry Regulation. Foreign conformity assessment bodies will also be facilitated upon the availability of bilateral mutual recognition agreement in accordance with its SNI mandatory regulation. Conformity assessment procedure is conducted based on conformity assessment scheme stated in the related regulation. For foreign manufactures, onsite inspection and/or factory visits can still be conducted as long as the dest ination countries open their border for representative from Indonesia conformity assessment body to perform the onsite inspection. Over the years, Indonesia has fully committed notifying the relevant Ministry Regulation regarding adoption of standards into technical regulation for industrial sectors to the TBT Committee. 2.1.2.22 Republic of Korea - Proposal for revision of the implementation rules and operation notification of the electrical appliances and consumer goods safety control act, G/TBT/N/KOR/950 (ID 72528) 2.73. The representative of China provided the following statement. China hopes Korea (1) clarif ies the differences between safety standard KC 60570 and IEC 60570. (2) delete s the classification of "Track system for power supply of lighting" listed in Type 5, Point 11, Schedule 2 of P roposed Amendment to the Operation Bulletin of the Electrical Appliances and Consumer Products Safety Control Act in order to avoid unnecessary trade barriers. 2.74. In response, the representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. This WTO/TBT notice is about the amendment of "Enforcement rules and operation bulletin of electrical appliances and consumer goods safety control act" to introduce electrical supply track systems for luminaires as electrical goods subject to safety management. This amendment is in order to manage the safety of electrical supply track systems for luminaires, which has recently seen a surge in demand. Due to the ease of interior design, the use of the item is increasing in shopping malls and homes. Accordingly, i n order to prevent safety accidents and protect consumers, we plan to verify the safety of electrical supply track systems for luminaires by designating the product as an electrical appliance subject to certification and applying KC 60570 which is harmoniz ed to international standard IEC 60570. It is currently undergoing amendment and is scheduled to be completed by 2022. However, as a result of collecting opinions from stakeholders such as public hearings, it will be officially implemented after a six -month grace period is granted. China's comment made today will be conveyed to our competent regulatory authority and will be replied to China soon. 2.1.2.23 United States - Energy efficiency requirements for general service lamps (GSL), G/TBT/N/USA/1734 (ID 72629) 2.75. The representative of China provided the following statement. We would like to make the following suggestions to Energy efficiency requirements for general service lamps (GSL). (1) A 28 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 725 . 29 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 726 . G/TBT/M/85 - 22 - transition period of at least three years should be given to GSIL to fulfill the requirements of minimum efficacy as 45 lm/W. (2) For museums, art galleries, art classrooms, etc. which have higher requirements for colour rendering index (RA ≥90 and R9≥60~80), the use of halogen tungsten lamps should be allowed. (3) The statement "and any other lamps that the Secretary determines are used to satisfy lighting applications traditionally served by GSILs" gives the Secretary too much discretion. It is recommended that the new product categories within the scope be clearly listed in the regulations, and a three -year transition period for the new product categories should be given. 2.76. In response, the representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States appreciates the comments submitted by China on 24 June 2021, concerning our 27 May 2021 WTO notification of a request for information regarding general service lamps ("GSLs"). The United States will take into consideration all comments received during the open comment period and respond to each substantive comment in the next publishe d rulemaking document for General Service Lamps. 2.1.2.24 Spain – Amendment of Royal Decree 1521/1984 by the Secretariat for Fisheries of Spain (ID 72730) 2.77. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile welcomes the opportunity to comment in this Committee on the Spanish General Secretariat for Fisheries' draft legislation, which seeks to amend Annex IV to Royal Decree No. 1521 of 1 August 1984 of the Secretariat f or Fisheries of Spain with regard to the national trade names accepted in this country and the names of prepared and preserved foods applicable to fisheries and aquaculture products. Under current Spanish legislation, the entire family of the Mytilus species is known commercially as "Mejillón" (mussel). The draft amendment proposes the trade name "Mejillón" for the species Mytilus edulis and Mytilus galloprovincialis , with the species Mytilus chilensis being exclusively described as "Mejillón Chileno" or "C horito" (Chilean mussel). The scientific evidence shows that the European species ( Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mytilus edulis ) are of the same genus as the endemic species Mytilus chilensis . The Mytilidae family is a diverse group of marine bivalves with a wide anti -tropical distribution. In Chile, at least three species of the Mytilus genus are present in the south of the country. The study "Genetic characterization and spatial distribution of the Mytilus genus in Chile", conducted by the Universidad Aus tral de Chile (Southern University of Chile), carried out work on different species of the Mytilus genus using molecular markers. The results of this study indicate that the three species Mytilus edulis , Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mytilus chilensis are closely related both taxonomically (descriptive physical structure) and phylogenetically (molecular evolution). This study has therefore demonstrated with a strong bibliographical background, as do the digital taxonomic platforms specializing in registers of marine species (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS)), that the three species of the Mytilus genus share many structural, sexual, physiological and molecular characteristics that mean that they are undoubtedly classified under the same taxonomic gen us. As a result, any separation of the group beyond the level that groups them (genus) can be considered discriminatory as it is not in line with the scientific evidence presented. 2.78. In September 2019, Chile contacted Spain's official TBT/WTO enquiry point i n relation to the date of notification to the Committee of this proposed regulatory change, with a view to making the relevant comments, and did not receive a response. Chile continued to do so through diplomatic channels in 2020 and 2021. The response giv en was that the draft amendment to the Royal Decree was under discussion internally and so could be subject to changes, which, if applicable, would have to be submitted to the European Commission, and this is why the draft regulatory text has not yet been sent to the WTO. For this delegation, it is important to note that, within Chile's industrial and commercial activities, mussel cultivation is the second aquaculture activity after salmon farming, with 377,000 tonnes found in the sea, 11,000 hectares of se a under cultivation, 550 producing SMEs, 17,000 direct formal jobs, over 5,000 indirect jobs and 20 processing plants that contribute over USD 250 million per year to GDP. This is why an amendment to the regulation in question, in view of Spain's obligatio ns under the WTO TBT Agreement, should be notified to the Committee, thereby allowing for a period of time to make comments and accept the scientific evidence provided in order to avoid issuing regulations that have a detrimental impact on the importation of this product from Chile, without any justification. Chile hopes that this specific trade concern shall be duly addressed by the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, for which reason this delegation would be grateful for a prompt response through the official TBT/WTO enquiry point. 30 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 727 . G/TBT/M/85 - 23 - 2.79. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The modification to the Decree was notified on 18 September 2020 to the European Commission in accordance with the procedur es foreseen in Directive (EU) 2015/1535 which lays down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services. The following dialogue between the European Commission and Spain conclu ded in July 2021. The proposed modifications to the Decree are still at a draft stage. The Spanish TBT Enquiry Point intends to notify the measure to the WTO in accordance with the TBT Agreement, which will provide sufficient time to discuss the matters ra ised by Chile. 2.1.2.25 Indonesia - Import quota and SNI certification requirements (ID 72831) 2.80. The representative of China provided the following statement. Regarding the SNI certification requirements of Indonesia, we would like to suggest that Indonesia recognize the SNI certification and accreditation institutions and test laboratories which locate outside of Indonesia. In addition, the CB scheme or other third -party test data shall also be recognized. 2.81. In response, the representative of Indonesia provided the fol lowing statement. Indonesia respected its international obligations under the TBT Agreement. Indonesia would like to recall that SNI certification requirements for certain mandatory products have been all notified to TBT and provide a period of 60 days for Members to comment on the draft of regulations. Certification process for mandatory SNI in the industrial sector is carried out in accordance with common practice stated on the related ministerial regulations. Indonesia remains available for further bilat eral engagement and invites China to elaborate detailed concerns on SNI certification system. 2.1.3 Previously raised concerns 2.1.3.1 China - Requirements for information security products, including, inter alia, the Office of State Commercial Cryptography Administration (OSCCA) 1999 Regulation on commercial encryption products and its on -going revision and the Multi -Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) (ID 29432) 2.82. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan continues to have concerns regard ing the China's "Regulation on the Administration of Commercial Cipher Codes" and "Cyber Security Multi -Level Protection Scheme." Japan would like to refer to the previous statement we made at the last TBT Committee in June 2021. At the last TBT committee, China explained that they would release the regulations for public consultation. We recognize that the public consultation had done until 19 September 2020. Japan would like to request that China provide relevant information regarding the current revision process and that the regulations would be implemented transparently. 2.83. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. Regarding the Multi-Level Protection Scheme, the EU would like to refer to its comments raised at previous TBT Committee meetings, namely concerns around (i) the nature of the expert review that the Guidelines prescribe, (ii) the lack of clarity in certain definitions, and (iii) the subsequent unwarranted and significant market entry restrictions. The EU calls for enhanced proportionality and transparency in the implementation of the Cyber -MLPS. The EU also asks China to confirm whether the draft will be notified to the WTO for comments, to allow for adequate participation of interested parties. 2.84. In response, the rep resentative of China provided the following statement. With regard to the management of commercial encryption products, China has cancelled the approval of varieties and models of commercial encryption products, since 1 January 2020, and established a unif ied national certification scheme for commercial cryptography. The management of commercial encryption products fully reflects the principles of non -discrimination and fair competition. It treats domestic and foreign products as well as companies equally. China implements mandatory testing and certification on commercial encryption products related to national security, national economy, people's livelihood, and public interest, and implements voluntary testing and certification on other commercial encrypti on products. Regarding the MLPS （Multi-level Protection of Information Security Scheme ), with technological development and the increasingly complicated cybersecurity 31 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 728 . 32 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 294 . G/TBT/M/85 - 24 - circumstances, information security multi -level protection scheme needs to be improved in China. Based on experience in past years and responding to new development, Cybersecurity Law stipulates that China will carry out the cybersecurity MLPS, which is based on information security MLPS. To fulfil the requirements in Cybersecurity Law, the reg ulation on cybersecurity MLPS is under drafting, which was published for comments and will replace the former administrative measures on information security MLPS. 2.1.3.2 European Union - Hazard -based approach to plant protection products and setting of import to lerances (ID 39333) 2.85. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement. Once again, as on previous occasions, Costa Rica reiterates its support for the trade concern raised by Australia. Costa Rica is concerned about the hazard -based approac h adopted by the European Union given that, under the obligations of the multilateral system, all technical requirements must be based on the relevant international reference standard or a risk assessment providing the scientific evidence to support the me asure. Costa Rica reiterates its request to the European Union to ensure that the implementation of its regulations is based on the use of risk assessments through the application of criteria supported by sufficient scientific evidence, in line with the co mmitments established in the TBT Agreement. 2.86. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia would like to thank the EU for clarifying in previous sessions that requests for import tolerances for substances not authorized within the EU will be conducted in line with risk assessment principles on a case -by-case basis. However, Australia notes that the EU is considering to take into account environmental effects when assessing requests for import tolerances for active substances no longer approved in the EU. Australia does not support this approach as it assumes the EU is better placed to assess the environmental impacts of active substances in third countries than the chemical regulators in those countries. Australia would like to r eiterate it has a robust regulatory framework for agricultural and veterinary chemicals providing Australian farmers with safe access to the pesticides they need to maintain productivity and profitability while looking after Australia's unique environment. Australia would again request that the EU respects the conclusions of trading partners' regulators on the environmental impact of chemical substances and limits its assessment of requests for import tolerances to the consideration of dietary risks. Depart ing from this approach will result in significant and unwarranted trade disruption. We look forward to continued constructive engagement on this issue with the EU. 2.87. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement. As indicated on previous occasions, Colombia shares and supports the trade concern regarding the approach of the European Union (EU) to identifying substances with endocrine -disrupting or carcinogenic properties. As we have previously stated in this Committee, we reiterate the need to use risk analysis as a methodological tool for decision -making within the framework of assessment, management and communication. With the EU's action, it appears that risk assessment is losing ground, with the decision to accept or allow the use of subs tances following a hazard -based approach, disregarding the conditions of use and risk scenarios that enable science -based decisions to be made. Since this trade concern has been repeatedly raised in this Committee on several occasions, we request the EU to inform us how they are taking these comments into account and we would appreciate an update on how decisions on the use of plant protection substances are being made, as well as the methodology for defining maximum residue levels in products. 2.88. The represen tative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil would like to refer to its previous statements regarding STC 393. We emphasize that regulations on endocrine disruptors should be established according to sound scientific principles, taking all ava ilable data into consideration. Serious evaluations must be able to separate chemicals that have the potential to cause harm due to their endocrine mode of action from those substances that do not pose a threat to human health. A solid risk analysis, consi stent with Codex guidelines, is important to ensure transparency and predictability in the regulatory processes regarding plant protection products and LMRs. Brazil believes that the European approach to limit the use of pesticides is more trade restrictiv e than necessary to fulfill its legitimate objectives under the TBT Agreement. It also 33 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 393 . G/TBT/M/85 - 25 - disregards risk analyses in the setting of regulatory measures that may have a serious impact on trade. 2.89. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. Paraguay reiterates its position and refers to its previous statements by stressing the importance of adopting a scientific approach to the regulation of phytosanitary products based on the risk and not just on the hazard arising from the intrinsic propert ies of a chemical. In this regard, Paraguay once again requests the European Union to take into consideration information on pesticides provided by the specialized agencies recognized by the WTO, such as the Codex Alimentarius; reconsider its approach and base its decisions on conclusive scientific evidence and real risk weightings, in accordance with international standards and principles; ensure import tolerances; and, where necessary, provide adequate transitional periods. 2.90. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada would like to take this opportunity to once again echo the concerns raised by many other Members regarding the EU's hazard -based regulation for active substances in plant protection products. Canada does not favour or promote the use of any one production method over another. Instead, we support producers having access to a wide range of effective plant protection products that can be used safely in accordance with registered label directions and following their own as sessment of growing conditions, market demand and other factors. Plant protection products are registered for use in Canada only after rigorous scientific evaluations confirm that the risks are acceptable and the products have a demonstrated benefit to the prevention of pests. As such, these products have a role in supporting a variety of production methods and enable the sector to supply the vast array of differing products demanded by Canadian and international consumers. We encourage the EU not to limit or discourage the use of these agricultural tools, and base its regulatory decision -making on both hazard and risk for all active substances. The EU has mentioned that import tolerances are established based on risk assessments as set out in Regulation (EC ) 396/2005 and it has begun to provide clarity on the process. While we appreciate these efforts, Canada is not reassured and has yet to be convinced with the real -world feasibility, commercial viability and compliance with international obligations regard ing the EU's approach for setting import tolerances when a plant protection product has met the hazard -based "cut -off" criteria. We remain concerned with the predictability of the outcomes. Canada would be interested in receiving any available updates sinc e the last seminar held in January 2021 including whether the EU will offer further opportunities to learn more about the process. 2.91. In the information session DG SANTE hosted on 20 January 2021, it was mentioned that the Commission will "take into account e nvironmental aspects when assessing requests for import tolerances for pesticide substances no longer approved in the EU, while respecting WTO standards and obligations". Who in the Commission will be responsible for assessing environmental impacts? To eli minate the need for import tolerance requests for some substances and minimize disruptions to trade, Canada once again requests that the EU consider maintaining MRLs for substances that do not pose unacceptable dietary risks. We recognize that a dietary ri sk assessment as part of the re - authorization process would likely be needed, regardless of the results of the hazard screen. We welcome further engagement on this issue and invite the EU to share any relevant information on upcoming regulatory or policy c hanges to ensure that unnecessary trade barriers are minimized and that measures are consistent with international trade obligations. 2.92. The representative of Ecuador provided the following statement. Ecuador shares the concerns raised by the Members who have spoken before me. My country recognizes the importance of protecting human health and the environment; however, we consider that regulatory decisions taken on the basis of hazard -based criteria are inconsistent with international risk -assessment practices . Ecuador urges the EU to take into account scientific information emanating from the international specialized bodies recognized by the WTO, such as the Codex Alimentarius, which has relevant information on pesticides. Ecuador also urges the EU to take in to account the recommendations of the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade related to good regulatory practices, particularly with regard to carrying out a Regulatory Impact Analysis prior to the issuance of regulatory proposals, which examines all pos sible social, economic, environmental and health impacts. This is to ensure compliance with the obligation not to be more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective, in accordance with Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement. Lastly, my cou ntry once again calls upon the EU to ensure that, in cases where there is a lack of scientific information, EFSA does not make a recommendation on the MRL, since decisions on regulatory measures must be based on G/TBT/M/85 - 26 - conclusive risk analyses that provide real h ealth protection and do not constitute a technical barrier to trade. 2.93. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement. Argentina once again reiterates its concern regarding this matter and stresses the importance of ensuring that all Member s implement SPS measures based on risk assessments, taking account of the risk assessment techniques developed by international reference bodies. The latter include the principles for establishing pesticide MRLs, as well as the many risk analyses that, ove r the decades, the Codex Alimentarius has conducted to ensure safety in terms of MRL recommendations for different substances and crops. 2.94. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile associates itself with the statements by Australia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil, Paraguay, Canada and Ecuador, as these EU regulations will have far -reaching trade effects for Chile's export sector to this destination. 2.95. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement. We support the comments made by the preceding Members and reiterate our trade and systemic concern relating to the European Union's use of a hazard -based approach, instead of an approach based on full scientific risk asse ssments, when making regulatory decisions concerning the authorization of active substances used in plant protection products and when setting import tolerance levels for substances that meet the cut -off criteria in Regulation No. 1107/2009. We again empha size the need to base such determinations on conclusive scientific evidence, gathered from an assessment of the actual risks, to avoid some of these active substances, which remain important components of pest management systems, being withdrawn despite th eir safe use. This is due to the fact that an approach based on hazard rather than on actual risk could have a negative and disproportionate impact on production, while contributing little or nothing to the cited aim of protecting public health. Like other Members, we would like to be given further details on the way in which the European Union plans to take environmental effects into account when assessing requests for import tolerances for active substances no longer approved in its territory. Uruguay con tinues to support any multilateral work undertaken by the Codex Alimentarius to develop a harmonized, risk -based approach that ensures the protection of health, while facilitating international trade in food products. In the meantime, we once again call on the European Union to listen to and address the concerns expressed by a number of Members, and to reconsider its regulatory approach with a view to preventing the unjustified proliferation of barriers to international trade in agricultural products and the serious social and economic consequences of such an approach for other Members, in particular developing and least developed countries. 2.96. The representative of Panama provided the following statement. Panama echoes the statements made by the Members that h ave already taken the floor. My delegation is concerned about the hazard -based, not risk -based, approach adopted by the European Union to identify sanitary and phytosanitary protection substances. Panama reiterates its request to the European Union to adhe re to criteria supported by sufficient scientific evidence as set out in the TBT Agreement. We appreciate any information that the European Union can share on how this matter is being addressed. 2.97. In response, the representative of the European Union provide d the following statement. The EU reiterates that the scientific criteria to identify endocrine disruptors for plant protection products based on the WHO definition are applicable since 10 November 2018 and included in Regulation (EU) No 2018/605. We are a ware of general concerns on EU policy on plant protection products for the definition of scientific criteria to identify endocrine disruptors and on the establishment of import tolerances for substances not authorized in the EU, due to the so -called "cut -off" criteria in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. As previously explained, the European Union decided to follow the procedures of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for the management of import tolerance requests concerning active substances falling under these cut -off criteria, which include a risk assessment by an Evaluating EU member State and a scientific opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The granting of the import tolerance is then considered in line with risk analysis principles on a case -by-case basis and taking into account all relevant factors. The EU reiterates its commitment to act in full transparency and keep Members duly informed about further developments. G/TBT/M/85 - 27 - 2.1.3.3 China - Cyberspace Administration of China – Draft implementing measures for the Cybersecurity Review of Network Products and Services (ID 53334) 2.98. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan has its interest in and concern with regard to the Cybersecurity Review and would like to refer to the previous statement we made at the last TBT Committee in June 2021. China released the amendment of Cybersecurity Review Measures for public consultation in July 2021. In the amended proposal, we understand that the scope of the measure has expanded from the "important infor mation infrastructure operator" to "development of data processing activity conducted by data process operator". We would like to request that China clarify the definitions of "data process operator" and "data process activity". In addition, the amended pr oposal mandates those who affect or could affect national security to take the Cybersecurity review. Japan asks China to conduct such review based on technical neutrality and in a manner that does not discriminate foreign products. Japan would like to requ est China carefully consider entire comments submitted by Japanese government to the public consultation. 2.99. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU has raised the Security Review of Network Products and Services, inc luding the Cybersecurity Review Measures, in this Committee on several occasions, stressing our concerns related to these measures, which entered into force on 1 June 2020. We remain concerned that the measures are quite general and very broad discretionar y powers are left to the authorities in charge of the security review, raising concerns for foreign ICT operators. The measures are directed towards the purchasing activity of Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) operators by encouraging operators to apply for reviews in the case that they deem their purchase or procurement may pose a risk to Chinese national security. Most European companies established in China would become suppliers or sub -suppliers of these operators, and therefore would also be af fected by these reviews. The EU urges China to ensure clarity, transparency and objectiveness in the security review so that the measure does not become a new market access barrier. The EU also seeks an update of this measure from China. 2.100. In response, the r epresentative of China provided the following statement. In April 2020, Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC)and 12 other authorities jointly issued Cybersecurity Review Measures, focusing on national security risks associated with the procurement of ne twork products and services by critical information infrastructure operators. Through the cybersecurity review, the possible risks and hazards brought by the purchase of products and services to the operation of critical information infrastructure could be detected earlier and avoided, ensuring the security of the supply chain of critical information infrastructure, and safeguarding national security. The Measures came into effect on 1 June 2020, and the former Cybersecurity Review of Network Products and S ervices (for Trial Implementation) issued in May 2017 was repealed at the same time. In July 2021, CAC issued the revised draft Cybersecurity Review Measures for public comments. The measures are currently under revision. 2.1.3.4 India - Air Conditioner and its re lated Parts (Quality Control) Order, 2019, G/TBT/N/IND/110, G/TBT/N/IND/74 (ID 59835) 2.101. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea appreciates this opportunity to provide our comments again on "Air Conditioner and its related Parts (Quality Control) Order, 2018", notified to WTO TBT on 4 April 2018 as G/TBT/N/IND/74 , and on 28 October 2019 as G/TBT/N/IND/110 . Korean companies are having difficulti es regarding the regulations on air conditioners, so the Korean Government would like to make the following requests. First, factory inspections by the BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) are not being conducted outside India at all, so the manufacturing fact ories located in other countries outside India are having difficulties with the factory inspection. Therefore, we would like to request an additional grace period, or a non -face-to-face factory inspection plan for overseas factories that need BIS certifica tion. Additionally, at the WTO TBT Committee in November 2018, the Indian Government responded that the High Voltage Test Time requirement in Clause 15.3.4 of IS 1391 (Part 2):2018 would be revised in accordance with the international standard IEC 60335 -1. We would like to ask for the current status of India's efforts to harmonize its standard in line with international standard. 2.102. The representative of China provided the following statement. Firstly, it is suggested that India carry out online remote video i nspection and test samples should be properly sealing in a 34 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 533 . 35 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 598 . G/TBT/M/85 - 28 - secured area during the COVID -19 period. Secondly, it is suggested to accept sample tests and the testing results in Indian accredited third -party laboratories in China. Thirdly, it is suggested to postpone the effective date of BIS certification of air conditioner QCO to the ninth month after inspection could be audited by Indian BIS officials. 2.103. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. Foreign inspection visits are on hold due to the prevalent restrictions on international travel imposed by the Government of India, but in some instances by the government of other respective countries because of the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic. As soon as the situation of COVID -19 impro ves and the restriction is lifted, India will plan the inspections (factory visit). There is no provision in BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018, for remote assessment or any other means for inspection. 2.1.3.5 Colombia - Food Prioritized for its Sodium Content, Certification Requirements (ID 60936) 2.104. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement. Costa Rica reiterates its concern regarding the proposed Colombian Technical Regulation establishing the maximum sodium content for a prioriti zed list of a broad range of foods, such as tuna, chicken sausages, chorizo, salted biscuits, ham, peanuts, butter, mayonnaise, breads, pastas, wheat flour products, cream cheese, soups, sauces and sausages. Costa Rica firmly believes in implementing strat egies aimed at protecting public health by reducing the underlying factors of arterial hypertension and related non-communicable diseases. However, it is worrying that the proposed maximum sodium levels for the selected products are not substantiated by sc ientific evidence. Costa Rica also does not consider them to be based on the international reference standards established under the Codex Alimentarius. We call on Colombia to share with Costa Rica the scientific basis and risk assessment supporting the sodium levels established for each product, so as to facilitate our analysis of the legislation. We would be grateful if the delegation of Colombia could provide us with information on the status of this Regulation and the possible date for its entry into fo rce. 2.105. In response, the representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia welcomes the comments shared by Costa Rica and would like to present the following considerations in this regard. Colombia reiterates that Resolution No. 2013 of 20 20 was issued for public health reasons and is part of a comprehensive national strategy that covers not only the sodium content of processed foods, but also other sources of sodium, such as the salt added to food preparations in restaurants, at home and i n institutions. The strategy seeks to reduce the number of deaths attributable to high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease by gradually reducing the consumption of salt from food sources until the WHO recommendation for 2021 has been achieved: 5 gram s of salt or 2 grams of sodium per person per day. With regard to concerns about the technical and functional role of sodium in the production of prioritized foods, Colombia wishes to reiterate that this aspect was analysed at all the technical meetings fo r the 12 categories of food with industry, academic and government representatives, resulting in agreement on, and the dissemination of, the draft regulations. The following documents shared by Colombia were produced by the Ministry of Health and Social We lfare and provide support for the measures taken through Resolution No. 2013 of 2020 on the maximum sodium content for processed foods.37 Colombia would also like to point out that the relevant authorities have expressed their willingness to hold technical discussions with the Costa Rican authorities in order to address the concerns raised and ensure compliance with the technical regulations on the maximum sodium content for processed foods. We therefore very much look forward to setting up a meeting. 36 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 609 . 37 National Strategy for the Reduction of Sodium/Salt Consumption 2012 –2021. Available at: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital /RIDE/VS/PP/SNA/Estrategia -reduccion -sal- 2012-2021.pdf Regulatory impact analysis of the draft resolution defining the maximum sodium content for prioritized foods. Available at: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/SNA/analisis -impacto -normati vo-sodio.pdf G/TBT/M/85 - 29 - 2.1.3.6 Europ ean Union - Non-renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb, G/TBT/N/EU/712 (ID 62738) 2.106. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement. Costa Rica wishes to express its support for the concern raised by Paraguay, Brazil, Australia, Colombia and Ecuador in relation to the draft Implementing Regulation notified by the European Union, under which approval for the use of mancozeb would not be renewed. As previously stated, Costa Rica recognizes that Members have the right to determine the appropriate level o f sanitary or phytosanitary protection needed to protect human, animal or plant life or health, and to establish measures to that end. In turn, may we remind Members that these measures must be science -based and should not create unnecessary barriers to tr ade, especially at a time when the pandemic continues to affect the economic recovery of international markets. To assess just how crucial the substance mancozeb is to agricultural production in Costa Rica, it is sufficient to note that it is currently use d for more than 20 crops that are grown for export and domestic consumption, and is therefore vital for ensuring the supply of food. Mancozeb is also used to combat pests of economic importance, particularly in banana production. 2.107. Costa Rica is the world's second largest exporter of bananas, and the first country to have obtained a geographical indication for this product. The main destination for exports is the European Union, to which over 50% of the fruit produced in Costa Rica is sent. In Costa Rica, the re are currently no authorized plant protection products that could be used as substitutes for, or are similar to, mancozeb. This illustrates the impact that would be generated by the ban on the use of mancozeb and the subsequent reduction in MRLs for this substance in bananas. Despite Costa Rica's many reservations about the reasoning behind EU regulations, the Costa Rican banana sector continues to seek alternatives to mancozeb. However, time will be needed to complete the relevant tests and approval proc edures for any alternatives found. Costa Rica therefore once again requests that the EU postpone the non -renewal process and subsequent reduction of MRLs for mancozeb, so as to give the national sanitary and phytosanitary authorities a reasonable period of time to respond to the numerous challenges posed by the COVID -19 pandemic and find an alternative substance so that Costa Rican farmers can continue to grow bananas and export the volumes required to meet the EU market demand. 2.108. The representative of Colomb ia provided the following statement. Colombia reiterates its concern regarding the measure notified by the European Union (EU) in document G/TBT/N/EU/712 of April 2020 relating to non -renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb. As we have already explained, the EU has a dopted measures resulting in the non -approval of the use of plant protection products, which is affecting exports from Colombia. Measures to suspend or not approve the placing on the market of many active substances, and the subsequent reduction of their M RLs to the minimum level of detection, are being taken without strong scientific evidence and without demonstrating that they are indeed the least trade -restrictive measures to achieve an appropriate level of protection. We have already referred to the imp ortance of this plant protection substance for Colombian industry on previous occasions. On this occasion, we would like to ask the EU to provide clarification on the relationship between the notification in document G/TBT/N/EU/712 on mancozeb and the notification in document G/TBT/N/EU/797 regarding the REACH regulation, with respect to substances that are carcinogenic, mutagenic and toxic for reproduction. 2.109. We would also like to recall that, even though in this and various other cases we have requested the EU to provide information on the deadline for the adopt ion of the standard and on the implementation of maximum residue limits, the EU has failed to respond to these requests. We ask it to please respond to these concerns. We recall that Article 2.12 of the TBT Agreement provides that "Members shall allow a re asonable interval between the publication of technical regulations and their entry into force in order to allow time for producers in exporting Members, and particularly in developing country Members, to adapt their products or methods of production …". In line with the above, the information available indicates that EFSA has initiated the procedure for revising MRLs for mancozeb. In this regard, we ask the EU how, as interested trading partners, we can participate in this review process and how our comment s will be taken into account, and we request information on the time frames envisaged for a decision by EFSA. Lastly, we once again invite the EU to follow the recommendations for good regulatory practices, under which standards must be based on clear 38 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 627 . G/TBT/M/85 - 30 - and objective information, and open dialogue with stakeholders, transparency and the minimizing of market distortions must be promoted. 2.110. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil would like to convey once again its concerns regarding the non -renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb, according to European TBT notification G/TBT/N/EU/712 . Mancozeb is a substance whose use is approved for many different crops by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, including soy. MRLs for soybeans in Brazil are set in 0,3 mg/kg. Around 11% of the soy produced in Brazil is exported to the EU. Therefore, restrictions on mancozeb will significantly impact the income of Brazilian farmers. The availability of an alternative to mancozeb in the short to medium term is also limited by the fact that other substances of similar use have already been banned in the European market, such as chlorothalonil. Mancozeb is an important substance for the management of fungicide resistance to control soybean rust. It is used as a crop protection additive, intended to increase the effectiveness of other fungicides, minimizing resistance, and prolonging the life cycle of other molecules. In light of the insufficient transitional period granted by the EU, such crops cannot have their treatments changed in time for exportation to the EU market before the entry into force of the regulation. Brazil would like to urge European authorities to consider establishing transition periods that are adequate to the production cycle of the affected crops. Brazil also respectfully asks the EU to align MRLs with limits established under the framework of Codex Alimentarius and to consider less trade -restrictive alternatives that would also safeguard its legitimate policy objective. 2.111. The representative o f Australia provided the following statement. Australia recognizes the European Union (EU)'s right to regulate the manufacture and use of plant protection products in agriculture to address risks unique to its settings. However, Australia reiterates its co ncerns about the proposed non -renewal of mancozeb and the potential impact on Maximum Residues Limits (MRLs) and effects this may have on trade, including wine exports to the EU. Australia seeks clarification on whether stocks which are in -market prior to the required period from entry into force of this regulation will continue to be eligible for sale in the EU. Australia also notes that the EU has recently made several plant protection product non -renewal decisions and subsequent changes to relevant MRLs which are impacting Australia's trade with Europe. Australia seeks further clarification on how this decision will impact future decisions around MRLs. Australia notes the EU's previous advice that they are undertaking a review of existing MRLs for dithioc arbamates. We would welcome a progress report on this. Australia would also note that our competent domestic authority (Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority) and Codex have determined MRLs for dithiocarbamates that ensure the continued protection of human, animal and environmental health while allowing trade to continue. 2.112. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. This concern and the non-renewal of the approval of the remaining substances were already discussed exte nsively both in this Committee and in the SPS Committee because of the subsequent reduction in the MRLs. Paraguay therefore refers to its previous statements and reiterates its cross -cutting concern with regard to the EU's decision not to renew the approva l of these substances without a proper risk analysis and without complying with scientific principles. Paraguay reiterates, like other Members, that the climatic conditions and pest -pressure levels of our countries are very different from those of the Euro pean Union and substances such as mancozeb are effective and safe tools for their control. In the case of this substance, our position is shared by some EU Members, who, unlike Paraguay and other WTO Members, may benefit from emergency authorizations. Arti cle 53 of Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009 provides that "in special circumstances a Member State may authorise, for a period not exceeding 120 days, the placing on the market of plant protection products, for controlled and limited use, where such a measure appears necessary because of a danger which cannot be contained by any other reasonable means." According to data from EU countries, such as Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Sweden, have benefited from emerg ency authorizations for this substance, thus it is well established that it is necessary to control dangers "which cannot be contained by any other reasonable means". 2.113. As we have already heard in this room, the mancozeb compound was developed in Europe almost 60 years ago to protect crops. It is currently registered for more than 70 crops and over 400 approved uses around the world. It is one of the most robust active assets, in that there have been no reports since its registration of a loss of sensitivity, of resistance or of any harmful effects on treated crops. This is owing to the substance's multi -site properties, which enable it to attack different parts of the fungus without creating resistance. As a result, when used in accordance with the instructio ns on the labels, it is considered to be a key tool in fungus control programmes. The G/TBT/M/85 - 31 - most recent emergency authorization in the EU public database (BE -Be-2021-13), for example, cites studies on the need to use this substance to combat a fungus that requir es temperatures of between 25°C and 30°C and a relatively high degree of humidity, conditions that the country concerned sees only on a few occasions. Imagine, Chair, how many more times and for how many more fungi those thresholds are reached in tropical and sub -tropical countries such as ours. The same authorization highlights this product's importance because it does not create resistance. 2.114. Paraguay shares the objectives that the EU seeks to address with these policies, but does not share its adopted meth od for attaining them because it is not based on conclusive scientific evidence and does not consider less trade restrictive options or valid alternatives for hazard control that, based on the requirements for emergency authorizations and the number of suc h authorizations approved for mancozeb, we can assume the EU agrees do not exist in this case. The EU has stated on previous occasions that emergency authorizations are only given for 120 days and that 90% of these are for approved substances. However, it should be recalled on this point that there is no limit on these authorizations, even for the 10% for unapproved substances, and that given the lack of viable alternatives, renewals will continue to be granted. We echo Colombia's question on how the Member s concerned by the process can participate in the analysis that the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is conducting on the MRLs for mancozeb and also on how comments submitted by Members will be taken into account. 2.115. The representative of Ecuador provide d the following statement. Mancozeb is a fungicide used throughout the world for a wide range of strategic crops, a number of which are produced in Ecuador. Examples include, inter alia , bananas, cocoa, broccoli, pineapples, pitahayas, mangoes and cape goo seberries. This compound is important for pest management in countries with tropical climates – like Ecuador – in which pest behaviour follows patterns that are very different from those prevailing in countries with four seasons, meaning that chemical pest icides for agricultural use with the active ingredient mancozeb are vital for agricultural production. Prohibiting the use of mancozeb – without effective alternatives – could have a very significant economic impact on small -, medium -, and large -scale prod ucers in Ecuador, as well as on consumers in the EU, because the supply of our products would be affected. I must point out that the way in which this substance is applied in banana production means that the use of mancozeb is the most effective and enviro nmentally friendly phytosanitary control method for Black Sigatoka. Black Sigatoka is considered to be the most destructive foliar disease for banana and plantain crops; it is thought to pose the highest economic risk for such crops and can cause yield los ses of up to 50%. It is concerning that there are currently no approved and properly registered alternatives to this substance that are as effective as mancozeb. 2.116. Ecuador urges the EU to take into consideration the relevant scientific information emanating from international specialized agencies recognized by the WTO, such as the Codex Alimentarius, which has information relating to this substance. We wish to recall that Ecuador was part of a group of 39 WTO Members that, in 2020, called upon the EU to tempo rarily suspend processes related to the review of authorizations for the marketing and use of plant protection substances, and their entry into force, in the context of COVID -19, a disease that continues to claim thousands of lives throughout the world. Fo r these reasons, Ecuador calls upon the EU to consider alternative measures that are less trade -restrictive, to identify substitute substances that enable existing trade to continue, to base its measures on conclusive studies, not only the precautionary pr inciple, and to establish transition periods of at least 36 months for the registration of alternative substances, in view of the current shortage of tools available to control pests. 2.117. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. The delega tion of Chile welcomes the earlier statements concerning the EU's non -renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb and echoes the trade concern raised at this meeting and previous meetings of the Committee. 2.118. The representative of Panama provided the following statement. Panama supports this STC and reiterates its concern regarding the non -renewal of mancozeb. We are concerned that the inclusion of this item on the agenda for every meeting will be treated merely as a matter of procedure, which wou ld suggest that our concern has not been satisfactorily addressed. The active substance mancozeb is vitally important for the country's main crops. Its specific mode of action means that it is irreplaceable in the control of black sigatoka, which is the ma in pest in tropical crops. There are currently no other active ingredients available to replace mancozeb, leaving the industry without any phytosanitary tools, and thereby having a severe impact on Panama's exports to the G/TBT/M/85 - 32 - European Union and negatively affe cting the way of life of many farmers in my country who depend on agricultural exports. Panama recognizes the right of Members to determine the appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or he alth, yet this must be based on conclusive scientific evidence and should not create unnecessary barriers to trade. In the light of the foregoing, Panama once again requests that the EU postpone the non - renewal process for the maximum residue limit for man cozeb. 2.119. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement. Mancozeb is an active substance that is authorized and widely used in a safe manner in Uruguay for the control of diseases and pests in various national fruit and vegetable sector produ cts, including apples, pears and citrus fruits. It is particularly important for the control of apple and pear scab, which is the main disease affecting apple and pear production and is caused by fungus of the genus Venturia spp. In this connection, we sup port the concerns and requests raised by other delegations, particularly with respect to the possibility that, as a result of the ongoing review process, the EU may significantly reduce the corresponding maximum residue levels, even lowering them to the li mit of determination, without having any conclusive scientific evidence that substantiates such a decision in line with the WTO SPS Agreement. Against this backdrop, like other Members, Uruguay recalls the importance of taking due account of international standards, guidelines and recommendations and the scientific information produced by international standard -setting bodies recognized at the WTO, such as the Codex Alimentarius. 2.120. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following s tatement. We have provided detailed explanations on this issue in previous TBT Committees. On 17 April 2020, the European Union notified to the TBT Committee a draft Commission Implementing Regulation concerning the non -renewal of the approval of the activ e substance mancozeb, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 on the placing of plant protection products on the market. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2087/2020 entered into force on 4 January 2021. The non -renewal was based on a scientific asses sment conducted under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 by experts from the EU member States and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Since EFSA concluded that mancozeb does not meet the approval criteria as outlined in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the approval of this substance was not renewed. EU member States had to withdraw existing authorizations for plant protection products containing mancozeb at the latest by six months from the date of entry into force of the Implementing Regulation (by 4 July 2021). The grace period, in line with Article 46 of Regulation 1107/2009, shall expire, at the latest, after 12 months from its entry into force (by 4 January 2022). The withdrawal period for existing authorizations and the grace period have bee n extended, when compared to the original proposal, in order to accommodate requests. Following non -approval and the expiry of all grace periods for stocks of products containing this substance, separate action on Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) may be taken and a separate notification will then be made in accordance with SPS procedures. 2.121. The EU would like to inform Members that EFSA has recently started a review of the existing MRLs for dithiocarbamates (group of which mancozeb is part). Interested parties ar e invited to actively contribute with relevant information to this MRL review through the main authorization holder, as described in document G/SPS/GEN/1494/Rev.1 .39 For advice on alternatives to mancozeb, the EU pesticides database40 is publicly available and contains information on all active substances, their approval status and their main purpose (e.g. fungicide, insecticide or herbicide). As regards the joint Request for the suspension of the processes and entry into force of redu ction of MRLs of plant protection products in light of the COVID -19 pandemic in documents G/SPS/GEN/1778 and G/TBT/GEN/296 and subsequent revisions, the EU position is included in the document of 28 May 2021 with double reference G/SPS/GEN/1814/Rev.2 and G/TBT/GEN/315 circulated in both Committees. 39 https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_mrl_guidelines_mrl -review_en.pdf 40 https://ec.europa.EU/food/plant/pesticides/eu -pesticides -db_en G/TBT/M/85 - 33 - 2.1.3.7 India - Quality Control Orders for Chemical and Petrochemica l Substances, G/TBT/N/IN D/150, G/TBT/N/IND/151, G/TBT/N/IND/152, G/TBT/N/IND/153, G/TBT/N/IND/154, G/TBT/N/IND/116, G/TBT/N/IND/121, G/TBT/N/IND/122, G/TBT/N/IND/123, G/TBT/N/IND/124, G/TBT/N/IND/125, G/TBT/N/IND/126, G/TBT/N/IND/127, G/TBT/N/IND/128, G/TBT/N/IND/129, G/TBT/N/IND/130, G/TBT/N/IND/132, G/TBT/N/IND/133, G/TBT/N/IND/134, G/TBT/N/IND/135, G/TBT/N/IND/136, G/TBT/N/IND/137, G/TBT/N/IND/138, G/TBT/N/IND/139, G/TBT/N/IND/140, G/TBT/N/IND/141, G/TBT/N/IND/142, G/TBT/N/IND/144, G/TBT/N/IND/175, G/TBT/N/IND/176, G/TBT/N/IND/177, G/TBT/N/IND/186, G/TBT/N/IND/187, G/TBT/N/IND/191, G/TBT/N/IND/193, G/TBT/N/IND/199 , G/TBT/N/IND/201 , G/TBT/N/IND/202 , G/TBT/N/IND/203 , G/TBT/N/IND/204 , G/TBT/N/IND/205 , G/TBT/N/IND/206 , G/TBT/N/IND/208 (ID 63041) 2.122. The representative of The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu provided the following statement. The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu would like to express its concerns about the Order issued by India's Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers on phthalic anhydride, n -butyl acrylate and ter ephthalic acid, which were notified by G/TBT/N/IND/116 , G/TBT/N/IND/123 and G/TBT/N/IND/124 . We would like to thank India for postponing the enforcement date on the products concerned until 20 December 2021. However, since the pandemic will not likely end in the short term, we understand the difficulty of conducting regular conformi ty assessment procedures under the current situation, especially "on -site" factory inspection. Nevertheless, we still suggest that India implement alternative measures during the pandemic regarding all products concerned, such as allowing testing laborator ies and inspection bodies from other WTO Members to participate in the conformity activities procedures and accepting their reports or remote factory inspection, to address the difficulties of physical inspection resulted from international travel restrict ions. 2.123. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. As of November 2021, India's Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers (MoCF) notified 44 Quality Control Orders (QCO) to the WTO TBT Committee. Each QCO appears to identify substa nces that correspond to or fall under the 72 identified chemicals and petrochemicals for which India intends to mandate compliance to standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). We also understand that in April 2021, MoCF published final version s of seven of the notified QCOs in the Gazette, with the measures set to enter into force on 15 October 2021. Given the impact on trade and the difficulty in accessing the referenced standards, we kindly reiterate our request for the notified QCOs and any future QCO notifications, India provide the website links to and/or complete copies of the BIS proposed standard. With respect to the previously notified QCOs, we recommend that such website links and/or copies be notified as addenda. Without access to the BIS standards, Members and industry are unable to understand the QCOs or provide meaningful comments. 2.124. We welcome India's 8 October 2021 amendment to the Polyethylene QCO, which postpones the implementation date by 180 days, and we understand from industry that Indian authorities will engage in industry consultations during this period. Notwithstanding this development, we note US industry's concern that the draft of the Polyethylene QCO (notified as G/TBT/N/IND/191) which mandates the marking of individual unit packages of polyet hylene product with "designation codes" containing an array of technical information (e.g. a product's melting point, density, and destination use), may pose challenges for exporters. Specifically, as India engages in consultations on the Polyethylene QCO, we would like to relay US industry's concern that, as proposed, the designation code for polyethylene products may provide limited utility to end users considering the numerous physical properties and applications that a category of polyethylene product m ight have. We encourage India to consider the use of alternative methods, such as QR codes, to meet the Polyethylene QCO's mandatory labelling requirements. We want to highlight that Polyethylene QCO may inadvertently disrupt Indian imports of, and access to, essential materials used by Indian health care, pharmaceutical, and other Indian export -critical sectors such as the automotive sector. Would India consider exempting polyethylene products used as intermediate inputs from the labelling requirements set forth in the Polyethylene QCO for these purposes? 2.125. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to refer to its previous statements on this matter. The EU remains concerned over the visible trend towards mandatory domestic standards in India that deviate from international 41 For previo us statements follow the thread under ID 630 . G/TBT/M/85 - 34 - ones in a growing number of sectors. In this case, they pertain to a whole range of chemical products under the HS chapters 28 and 29. The EU took note of recent Indian TBT notif ications pertaining to Quality Control Orders for chemical substances. We note that QCO notifications bearing numbers G/TBT/N/IND/201 -206, G/TBT/N/IND/208 , and G/TBT/N/IND/215 do not have a determined date of entry into force. In fact, the entry into force is dependent on the adoption date, which is not indicated. Could Indi a provide information regarding the planned time for the adoption of these measures? Furthermore, the EU noticed that there is an increasing number of TBT -notified Indian QCOs on chemicals and petrochemicals that are not implemented. The European Union wou ld like to ask India to explain the reasons for repeated postponement of implementation of notified measures in this sector. Given the confusion this situation creates, could India provide a list of chemicals and petrochemicals which have already been impl emented, together with copies of relevant Orders? 2.126. The European Union would like to recall its request to India for clarification explaining the reasons for establishing India -specific Quality Control Orders when these chemical products already comply with internationally recognized standards. The EU would like to remind the authorities of India that in accordance with the TBT Agreement, standards are considered voluntary, whereas mandatory standards are considered as technical regulations. The EU would like to recall Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement, according to which Members shall ensure that technical regulations are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade. The EU would al so like to encourage India to align the BIS standards with international approaches. 2.127. The representative of Singapore provided the following statement. Singapore echoes the concerns raised by other Members, and we would like to reiterate our concerns expres sed at the previous meeting, contained in document G/TBT/M/84 . We remain concerned about the operational challenges that we had outlined previously vis -à-vis the labelling requirements for polyethylene (PE) materials used for moulding and extrusion. We respectfully request for India to posit ively consider alternatives that have been proposed by the industry to meet the information requirements of the Quality Control Orders on PE products, to ensure that the mandatory labelling requirements are not too onerous and challenging for the industry to comply with. With regards to the QCOs on ethylene glycol and styrene monomer, we understand that India is looking to allow virtual inspections as part of the certification process. We remain interested in, and look forward to working with India to initiate these inspections, whether virtual or in -person, as soon as possible, to facilitate progress in the certification process for the industry. For any new additional QCOs, Singapore would like to reiterate our request for India to provide specific weblink s and/or copies of the proposed BIS standards together with the notification to the WTO in a timely manner, to enable interested parties to acquaint themselves with the new requirements, and provide meaningful comments to India. Finally, we respectfully ur ge India, as per its obligations under the TBT Agreement, to align the QCO standards with international standards which already exist, to reduce industry's compliance costs, and to ensure that measures imposed are not more trade -restrictive than necessary. 2.128. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. India issuing Quality Control Order for chemicals and petrochemicals of HS chapters 28 and 29 as mandatory is in line with the international practices. India has formulated individ ual standards for specific chemicals indicating discrete and separate numbers under the BIS Act, giving technical characteristics and testing methods. Since each chemical has a different BIS standard number and possesses different features and testing meth ods, India has not preferred to file a single comprehensive mandatory notification. DCPC (Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals) has notified the draft Quality Control Orders on chemicals and petrochemicals under the provisions of BIS Act 2016 and Rul es and Regulations framed thereunder, which envisages conformity assessment Scheme -1 of BIS Regulations 2018. As per draft QCOs, the product specified therein shall conform to the corresponding Indian Standard and shall bear the standard mark under the lic ence from BIS as per Scheme -1 mentioned above. These QCOs are equally applicable to domestic and foreign manufacturers. Under the provisions of the BIS Act 2016, no person shall manufacture, import, distribute, sell, hire, lease, store, or exhibit for sale chemicals and petrochemicals notified in the QCO without a standard mark, except for a valid licence. Violators often attract the penal provisions of the BIS Act 2016. The requirement for using Standard Mark as per Scheme -1 is given in BIS (Conformity Ass essment) Regulations 2018. A copy of the same is available on the BIS website (www.bis.gov.in ). G/TBT/M/85 - 35 - 2.129. Under the provisions of Scheme -1 of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulation 2018, the licence can be granted for a minimum of one but up to two years and subsequently can be renewed for a period of a minimum of one, but up to five years. Under these provisions, BIS grants a licence to the manufacturer based on a successful assessment of the manufacturing infrastructure, produc tion process, quality control and testing capabilities of a manufacturer through a visit to its manufacturing premises. Conformity of the product to the relevant standard is also established through third -party laboratory testing in India or testing in the manufacturing premises or a combination of both. Under Scheme -1 of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulation 2018, there is no provision to accept quality control assessments conducted by foreign firms and Labs. As per Quality Control Orders on chemicals and petrochemicals, every product shall conform to corresponding Indian standards specified therein and shall bear the standard mark under the licence from BIS as per Scheme -1 of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulation 2018. The standards of chemicals and petrochemicals which DCPC notified were reviewed by BIS, and due consideration was given to international standards like ISO/ASTM, wherever available. As per Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement, Members can formulate technical regulations to fulfil legitimate obj ectives inter alia national security requirements, prevent deceptive practices, protect human health or safety, animal or plant life or health or environment. As per the laid down procedure, the draft Quality Control Orders (QCO) were notified to the WTO T BT Committee, giving an opportunity to the Members to comment within 60 days. 2.130. These standards are made mandatory to protect human health and the environment. For a long time, the Indian standards of chemicals and petrochemicals were voluntary in nature. Th e trade of chemicals and petrochemicals usually occurs as per the specifications settled between the manufacturer and buyer irrespective of the specifications stipulated in the BIS standard, which sometimes results in dumping poor quality chemicals into In dia. Many chemicals are toxic and hazardous. The impurities such as heavy metals, cyanides, isocyanates, halides etc., enter the human and plant chain, harming human and animal life. Under mandatory standards regime, safe, reliable and quality chemicals ar e expected to be available. TRs for chemicals and petrochemicals have not been formulated to create unnecessary obstacles to international trade. The standards have been made mandatory after reviewing existing standards, stakeholder consultations, includin g leading manufacturers, to ensure the requirements reflect new testing methods. This measure does not hinder the ability of the foreign manufacturer to penetrate and reach into Indian chemical market. 2.1.3.8 Bangladesh - Hazardous Waste (E -waste) Management Rule s, 2019, G/TBT/N/BGD/3, G/TBT/N/BGD/3/Add.1 (ID 62042) 2.131. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. On 10 June 2021, Bangladesh published an updated draft of its Hazardous Waste (E -Waste) Management Regulation, 2021 (E -waste Rules). Could Bangladesh notify this updated dra ft to the WTO TBT Committee? US industry provided its latest comment on the revised draft on 20 September 2021. Previously, US industry raised concerns regarding the inclusion of threshold limits and restrictions of certain substances, which, if applied, w ould have disrupted or prevented the sale of many important electrical and electronic goods in Bangladesh, including certain medical devices, washing machines, and cellular phones. Based on an unofficial translation we have obtained of the previous draft E - waste Rules, our understanding of the revised draft is that it addresses concerns of certain substances by removing threshold limits for the following: antimony trioxide, beryllium metal, beryllium oxide, copper beryllium alloys, nickel, liquid crystals, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). 2.132. Please confirm that the June 2021 draft E -waste Rules no longer include threshold limits on these substances. Please also confirm that Bangladesh does not plan to include threshold limits on these substances in future iteratio ns of the E -waste Rules. The United States also asks Bangladesh to provide further details on its plans regarding implementation of the E -waste Rules, including implementation timelines, registration deadlines, and points of contact. Given the broad scope of the E -waste Rules, we encourage Bangladesh to provide a reasonable transition period, ideally of one year, for industry to adapt its products or methods of production to the new requirements. Finally, we ask that Bangladesh notify the revised draft text of the E -waste Rules to the WTO TBT Committee, provide a public comment period of at least 60 days, and take comments received into account before finalizing the regulation. 42 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 620 . G/TBT/M/85 - 36 - 2.133. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Alt hough the Rules are in effect from this year, several of its provisions are still ambiguous. We request Bangladesh to clarify this information to help Korean manufacturers comply with the E -waste management rules. 2.134. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada supports Bangladesh's efforts to protect the environment by introducing Waste Management Rules and facilitating resource recycling. Canada acknowledges Bangladesh's WTO notification made on the draft Hazardous Waste (E -waste) Ma nagement Rules, 2019 and appreciates the opportunity given to WTO Members to provide comments. Previously, Canada raised industry's concerns with the lack of clarity on this measure and asked Bangladesh to share the full regulatory text of the Management Rules with WTO Members. Furthermore, Canada strongly encouraged Bangladesh to ensure that the Management Rules are no more trade restrictive than necessary to meet its environmental objectives. At the last TBT Committee, Bangladesh indicated that most of th e concerns raised by WTO Members have been addressed and hopefully responses will be notified in due course. Canada understands that on 10 June 2021, Bangladesh published an updated draft of its Hazardous Waste (E-Waste) Management Regulation, 2021 (E -waste Rules). What plans does Bangladesh have for notifying this updated draft to the WTO TBT Committee? Will Bangladesh provide Members with a 60-day comment period, and a reasonable transition period for industry to adapt its products or methods of productio n to the new requirements? Also, will interested Members be receiving the full text of the measure and its supportive documentation? Canada would appreciate if Bangladesh could provide Members with a notional implementation timeline of the updated draft of its Hazardous Waste (E -Waste) Management Regulation, 2021 (E -waste Rules). 2.135. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union has concerns on the Hazardous Waste Management Rules. We sent written comments to Bangladesh in April 2020 and are looking forward to receiving written replies before the adoption of the notified drafts. Our main point is that the notified draft restricts use of substances that are not restricted by any existing international legislation an d thus creates more restrictions to trade than necessary. On 10 June 2021, Bangladesh published an updated draft of the E -Waste rules. This revised draft should be notified to the WTO TBT committee with a comment period of at least 60 days in order to prov ide the possibility for Members to comment. 2.136. In response, the representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement. Bangladesh would like to refer to its submission G/TBT/W/759 dated 22 June 2021 where concerns raised by the Members have been addressed. On this occasion Bangladesh would also like to mention that Bangladesh has revised the schedule according to the European Union Directive 2015/863, so Bangladesh believes all the concerns raised by Members have been addressed. The proposed rule will be effective after five years and Bangladesh has informed and notified accordingly. Bangladesh believes that the Members, especially those who raised concerns, need not to be concerned that Bangladesh did not do anything against the WTO TBT Agreement. If Members have further issues or concerns, then Bangladesh would also like to have bilateral meetings with Members for those concerns. 2.1.3.9 India - Indian standards and import restrictions in the automotive sector (Quality Control Orders): wheel rims, safety glass, helmets, G/TBT/N/IND/118, G/TBT/N/IND/147, G/TBT/N/IND/167 (ID 64943) 2.137. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. India has defined and introduced specific standards and certification requirements for a number of products across sectors that require on -site, in person audits. This is the case of the so -called Quality Control Orders (QCOs), which require a physical audit by an auditor of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) in order for products manufactured in third countries to receive the approval for exp orts to India. However, for the last two years Indian auditors are not in a position to conduct international audits due to the COVID -19 context. Unfortunately, India has refused to consider meaningful alternative options, such as virtual audits. Consequen tly, European Union companies, despite doing all that is necessary to meet the Indian requirements, are not able to obtain the required Indian certification or marking. Thus, while the EU and other foreign companies are not able to access the Indian market due to the lack of virtual audits on India's side, Indian auditors are conducting domestic audits that allow domestic companies to receive certification/marking and place their products on the market. 43 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 649 . G/TBT/M/85 - 37 - This is a clear case of discrimination against EU and other foreign companies. In this context, the EU welcomes the steps taken by the BIS to allow its auditors to audit foreign manufacturing plants. In the case of Indian QCOs, allowing the inspections out of India would be an important step towards solving t he current difficult situation and eliminating the discrimination between local and foreign companies. However, the EU is concerned that BIS auditors may only be conducting these audits in a few selected countries, and under certain, strict criteria drawn by India for auditing foreign plants. 2.138. BIS has reached out to some EU member States with these questions requesting their input that would allow them to plan their on -site international audits. However, while these audits, if re - initiated, may provide some relief to EU companies, the BIS' response would need to be much wider, given that many of the products under QCOs are produced in China or South East Asia which – as far as the EU knows – would not be on the travel plan of BIS auditors for the time -being. The EU would like to recall that the QCOs in question have protectionist orientation and are sending worrying signals to EU industry, EU investors, and EU member States. Once these measures come into force, they will cause extra burden and economic cost to the EU industry that will have to undergo cumbersome procedures to obtain necessary permissions and/or licences for products already certified under established international standards. In this context, the QCOs would add little value for Indian consumers , making the reason of their introduction not evident. Furthermore, the implementation of the QCOs for foreign companies with production facilities outside India may continue to prove difficult due to the still existing restrictions in view of the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic. That is why the EU would like to voice once again its concerns regarding the QCOs on automotive safety glass and wheel rims. 2.139. While the EU appreciates the postponement of these two QCOs – on safety glass to the spring of 2022, and on whee l rims until 1 September 2022, concerns persist that the continued COVID -19 pandemic and restrictions on international travel may not allow for their actual implementation. That poses the risk that on 1 April and 1 September 2022, when the QCOs for automot ive safety glass and wheel rims are due to enter into force, production lines may come to a standstill due to the lack of supply of safety glass and wheel rims compliant with Indian QCO. Such a situation could damage the Indian economy and Indian consumers and should be avoided. Therefore, the EU would like to suggest that India considers further postponement, of at least six months, of the entry into force of the QCO for safety glass, with a view to ensuring the continuity of imports of safety glass into I ndia. The EU would also like to urge India to consider virtual audits or audits performed by recognized third party certification experts in the location of the manufacturing plants. The EU would also like to recall that EU safety glass and wheel rims are certified under established international standards, which are not much different from the Indian ones, introduced by the QCOs in question. In this context, the QCOs on automotive safety glass and wheel rims will, as already mentioned, generate important a dditional costs for European automotive manufacturers without adding any qualitative value for Indian consumers. The EU therefore asks India to reconsider the introduction of the QCOs on automotive safety glass and wheel rims. Furthermore, the EU would like to recall its suggestion to keep the BIS marking as optional for components, which are already in compliance with the current marking requirements. 2.140. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement. Indonesia thanks India for notifying the draft of Automobile Wheel Rims (Quality Control), Order 2020 on 25 May 2020 to TBT WTO Members through G/TBT/N/IND/147 . Under these measures, wheel rims products shall conform to the IS 16192 and shall bear India Standard Marking under the licence form the Bureau of Indian Standar d (BIS). Indonesia has extensively communicated its concern through the Enquiry Points of TBT WTO on 25 August 2020, bilateral meeting in February 2021 and even the Permanent Mission of India in Geneva. Indonesia regrets that India is yet to provide substa ntive response to Indonesia's concern. According to the notification, this order shall come into force with effect from 1 October 2020, yet India has not made any addendum to the notification regarding the stipulation of the regulation. Indonesia seeks cla rification regarding the status of the implementation of the regulation. Indonesia is of the view that the regulation has impacted and become a trade barrier for the exporters as there is no clarity regarding the mechanism of the regulation. Therefore, Ind onesia requests India to postpone or provide sufficient transition time to allow industries to comply with the regulation. Indonesia remains concerned that the conformity assessment procedure as required in the document is more restrictive than necessary. The procedure includes audit and certification can only be carried out by BIS and requires factory visit as part of the scheme. Indonesia regrets that India has not taken into account the current pandemic situation that made factory visit impossible due to the travel ban and social distancing policy. Therefore, Indonesia urges India to G/TBT/M/85 - 38 - consider the use of remote assessment in conducting factory inspection or any relaxation policy as a means to facilitate trade and minimize technical barrier to trade, partic ularly in this difficult time. 2.141. Moreover, Indonesia has also regulated wheel rims products distributed in the market to conform with a national standard since 2012 that refers to an international standard. The procedure of certification is based on internat ional standard on conformity assessment, specifically type 5 of ISO IEC 17067, which is similar to India's certification scheme. Thus, Indonesia encourages India to recognize and accept conformity assessment results performed by accredited conformity asses sment bodies in Indonesia or outside India under the framework of IAF and ILAC signatory. Indonesia is also aware that before the mandatory implementation of IS 16192, India requires all manufactures of automobile wheel rims to implement ICAT (Internationa l Center for Automotive Technology) Standard prior to entering India's market. Therefore, we would like to ask clarification from India regarding the implementation of the ICAT standards once this regulation comes into force. Indonesia remains concerned ab out the potential duplicative conformity assessment procedure. Hence, Indonesia requests India to harmonize both requirements with a single conformity assessment procedure and remain using the mechanism of remote assessment as has been done in implementing the ICAT Standard. 2.142. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. The COVID -19 pandemic and the travel restrictions are not under our control. The foreign inspection visits are on hold due to the prevalent restrictions on trave l on account of the ongoing pandemic. India has stated it formally and we will reiterate: As soon as the situation improves and the restrictions are lifted, India will plan the inspections (factory visits). Further, there is no provision in the BIS for rem ote assessment or any other means of inspection. Wheel Rims: India would like to refer to its previous responses on this issue and reiterate them. The testing and certification system in India is in line with the global regime. Component certification is a n essential prerequisite of Whole Vehicle Type Approval, and the two are complementary. This practice is well established worldwide and quite harmonized under Whole Vehicle Type Approval. Unlike in European Union, where the wheel rim is not identified as a separate safety -critical component in UNECE, in India wheel rim is recognized as one of the critical safety components under the CMVR. This has been warranted considering India's local road infrastructure, the variety of tyres used, and driving behaviour. Wheel rim is a critical part influencing driving safety. These Indian standards have been prepared to ensure quality, reliability and consistency required, keeping in view human safety and consumer protection. These standards prescribe wheel rims' general and performance requirements intended for use on two, three and four-wheeled motor vehicles. The Quality Control Order (automotive wheel rims) is non - discriminatory, both at the original fitment level of automobiles and after sales/repair service, to ensure supply of only quality products in the Indian market duly certified approved by the Indian implementing agency. The QCO also provides for market surveillance to check the entry of sub - standard products into the Indian market. This was necessitated to pr otect human life and consumer interest. The Quality Control Order was issued after due consultation with stakeholders. Further, as desired by the stakeholders, a sufficient lead time of one year from the date of publication of the Gazette Notification of t he QCO has been provided for the industry to prepare itself. Safety Glass: Implementation of safety glass QCO has been again extended by one year beyond 1 April 2021, i.e. new implementation date is 1 April 2022. Like I said, foreign inspection visits are on hold due to the prevalent restrictions on international travel given the ongoing COVID -19 Pandemic. As soon as the situation of COVID -19 improves and the restrictions are lifted, India will plan the inspections (factory visit). 2.1.3.10 China - Commercial Cryptography Administrative Regulations (ID 64444) 2.143. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States has concerns regarding China's draft Commercial Cryptography Administrative Regulations, issued by the State Cryptography Administration on 20 August 2020 and we submitted comments to China in September 2020. The United States is concerned that this draft measure would impose potentially far-reaching, highly trade -restrictive cryptography -related constrain ts on foreign ICT products. Does China intend to notify this measure to the TBT Committee and allow for additional stakeholder comments? The provisions in the draft measure may raise serious concerns under the WTO Agreements, and appear to conflict with gl obally accepted practices to assess encryption in commercial ICT applications. We understand that China has received numerous comments on this draft. We hope that China will carefully consider the input from all stakeholders, including the US 44 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 644 . G/TBT/M/85 - 39 - Government an d our industry stakeholders, and make substantial changes and clarifications to the draft measure prior to implementation. The draft measure would establish a licensing scheme for all imports and exports of commercial cryptography in instances where "socia l and public interests" are concerned. Can China explain how it plans to implement this scheme in line with its national treatment commitments? What steps is China taking to ensure the scheme will be not operated as an unnecessary obstacle to trade? 2.144. What s teps is China taking to ensure its cryptography accreditation, testing and certification system will operate in accordance with Article 5 of the TBT Agreement? Specifically, how will China ensure that the conditions for foreign products are no less favoura ble than those accorded to domestic products? Although the draft measure ostensibly encourages participation in "the development of international standards for commercial cryptography", Articles 10 to 12 appear to mandate compliance with Chinese standards, which may diverge from international standards. In addition, the draft measure includes a standard setting process for commercial cryptography that appears to provide a different level of openness to domestic participants as compared to foreign participan ts. In the United States' view, China should adopt the use of relevant international standards and harmonize its practices with relevant international best practices. We would appreciate any update you can provide on the status of the draft measure, and ho w China intends to consider the public comments it has received. 2.145. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU is concerned about this partial implementation measure of the Cryptography Law, and sent comments to the Stat e Cryptography Administration of the People's Republic of China (SCA) last September. Specifically, concerns relate to (i) the scope of the law; (ii) the lack of clarity of concepts and precision of procedures; (iii) the protection of intellectual property ; (iv) the imposition of pre -market and export controls; (v) the requirements around testing and certification; (vi) the imposition of additional "national security reviews"; and (vii) the use of domestic standards, along with a lack of meaningful access t o pertinent Chinese standards development organizations. The EU urges the SCA to address these concerns in the further development of the draft regulations in order to ensure that legal and regulatory requirements are applied on a non -discriminatory basis, do not favour specific technologies, do not limit market access and do not lead to forced transfer of intellectual property. Additionally, the EU encourages the SCA to open up, in practice, the "Cryptography Industry Standardisation Technical Committee" ( CISTC) to foreign -invested industry based in China. The EU would appreciate its comments being taken into consideration and invites China to notify the draft regulations to the WTO. 2.146. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada note s China seeks to establish a unified national certification scheme for commercial cryptography. In September 2020, Canada provided China with written comments on a draft of China's State Cryptography Administration's cryptography regulations and continues to look forward to a response. At the last TBT Committee meeting in June 2021, as well as the one in February 2021, China indicated that a revision of the Regulation was still being studied and that China would solicit public opinions or public input when it is appropriate. Could China please indicate when the regulation will be notified to the WTO TBT Committee and available for WTO Members and stakeholders review and input? Canada requested, in previous meetings of the Committee, that China consider modif ying the regulations, and the Cryptography Law they implement, to provide further clarity, transparency and predictability. For example, Canada seeks the definition of terms, clarification that international standards will be used and further precision of the measures' scope. Canada would appreciate China's consideration of its comments and invites China to notify the draft regulations to this Committee. 2.147. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. The Revised Regulation on the Administration of Commercial Cryptography has been listed in the State Council Legislation Plan for 2021. The revision of the Regulation will follow law -based, democratic and scientific principles. And it will be open, transparent, and on a scientific bas is, to ensure participation of interested parties in the process of revision. G/TBT/M/85 - 40 - 2.1.3.11 United Kingdom - Wine labelling and documentation requirements at the end of the Brexit transition period (ID 66345) 2.148. The representative of Australia provided the following statem ent. Australia would like to reiterate the concerns we have raised in previous meetings. We acknowledge the United Kingdom's response in the previous Committee meeting, that wine marketed in Great Britain can show either a United Kingdom or a European Unio n importer on the label until 1 October 2022. As was raised in the previous meeting, we are seeking flexibility to allow the listing of importers on the label of wine bottles imported into the UK and for multiple destinations, particularly after that grace period ends. We believe it is possible, and less trade restrictive, to include details of the relevant UK importer as well as the details of importers for third -party markets on the same label, without undermining the UK's stated policy objective. Austral ia would appreciate further clarification on whether, following the conclusion of the grace period, the UK would consider it acceptable for wine to include a label indicating the importer for a third country, provided the label also clearly articulates the details of the UK importer, and that the third country importer is not the importer for the UK. For example: 'For the UK, imported by x:' and 'For the EU, imported by y:' If the UK does not consider this acceptable, can the UK explain the rationale for th is position, and how it is consistent with the UK's obligations under Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement. Australia welcomes the bilateral engagement we have had to date on this issue. 2.149. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement. We wish t o refer to our previous statements on this matter and once again express our interest in remaining informed of the regulatory requirements and conditions that will apply to the importation of wine into the United Kingdom market from 1 October 2022, in part icular with respect to documentation and labelling, and in such requirements being the least trade -restrictive possible. 2.150. In response, the representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement. The United Kingdom welcomes Australia's and Uru guay's continued interest in our wine labelling and documentation requirements, and the constructive bilateral engagement we have had with Australia on this topic to date. As per our previous statements, for wine imported into Great Britain, our regulation s allow for an importer situated in either the European Union or Great Britain to be shown on the label of wine products marketed in Great Britain until 1 October 2022. After that date, wine products marketed in Great Britain must bear the details of an im porter situated in Great Britain on the label of products. We reiterate that we designed the transitional arrangements in consultation and close cooperation with industry to minimise the impact on trade. The UK will seek to work collaboratively with the in dustry as we develop our regulatory regime to facilitate the global trade in wine, taking into account our policy objective on consumer protection. We remain available for further bilateral discussions with Australia and Uruguay to discuss our regulatory a pproach. Further details of the labelling measures that apply are available on the UK Government website.46 2.1.3.12 European Union - Wine labelling requirements – listing of importers for multiple destinations (ID 65947) 2.151. The representative of Australia provided th e following statement. Australia thanks the EU for clarifying its wine labelling requirements at the previous TBT Committee meeting in June. At that meeting, the EU indicated that "mentioning the entity that brought the wine into another third country befo re import into the Union could be only acceptable as an optional particular, provided it does not appear in combination with the words 'importer' or 'imported by (…)' and provided it is not misleading for consumers as regards the business food operator." W e have stated in previous committees and maintain that the EU allowing an "optional particular" on labels to cover importers in other third countries would be consistent with the EU's objectives, while still clearly identifying the EU importer and person a ssuming responsibility. For example: statements such as "For the EU, imported by:" and "For the UK, imported by:" would not mislead consumers as regards the business food operator. Australia seeks clarification on why the EU will not allow an optional part icular that appears in combination with the words "importer" or "imported by (…)". As we raised in the previous Committee meeting, we are also seeking clarity from the EU on whether it is possible to list importers for multiple destinations on the same win e bottle label under the current EU Regulation. Further guidance and clarity are important to provide certainty to traders and ensure no interruptions to 45 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 663 . 46 https://www.gov.uk/guidance/importing -and-exporting -wine 47 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 659 . G/TBT/M/85 - 41 - trade occur. If the EU does not consider this acceptable, can the EU explain the rationale for this position, and how it is consistent with its obligations under Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement. We look forward to working closely with the EU on this issue to ensure a mutually satisfactory outcome as we continue similar discussions with the UK to resolve t his issue for wine imported into the UK. 2.152. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. As explained in previous TBT Committees, the indication of the "importer" is a compulsory indication for wine imported into the EU and the importer is a natural or legal person or a group of such persons established in the EU. Any other indication on the label mentioning the entity that brought the wine into another third country before import into the Union could only be acceptab le as an optional particular, provided it does not appear in combination with the words "importer" or "imported by (…)" and is not misleading for consumers as regards the business food operator (i.e. the person assuming responsibility for bringing the wine into circulation in the EU). 2.1.3.13 India – Draft Food Safety and Standards (Import) Amendment Regulation, 2020, G/TBT/N/IND/180 (ID 66748) 2.153. The representative of The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu provided the following statement. The Separate Customs Terr itory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu respects India's effort to ensure imported food safety through this draft measure. As the proposed measure provides limited information on its implementation details, we submitted our comments on 30 December 2020 a nd raised the STC twice to seek clarification from India. However, we have not received any response from India up to this date. We urge India to observe the principle of transparency in relevant implementing measures of this regulation and would like to r equest India to provide clarifications on the following: 1. The specific categories of food products subject to compulsory registration mentioned in this draft. 2. Information on the inspection items covered by Article 18(3)(b) of the draft. 3. Format for the licence/registration specified in the Article 18(1)(c) of the draft. 4. Samples of documents listed in Annexure -I. 5. Fees involved in the whole registration process. 6. Guidance documents for manufacturers outside India to complete the required regist ration procedures. Our manufacturers will be positioned in a disadvantaged situation without knowing how to prepare themselves to meet the requirements. We would be grateful if our concerns could be taken into account and look forward to a written response . 2.154. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States remains concerned with India's draft amendment "Registration and Inspection of Foreign Food Manufacturing Facilities" to its Food Safety Standards (Import) Amendm ent Regulation, 2020, notified to the WTO TBT Committee as G/TBT/N/IND/180 on 25 November 2020. In response to India's notification, we submitted comments on 22 January 2021. This draft regulation leaves many unanswered questions for foreign food manufacturing facilities, competent authorities, and other stakeholders. The United States raised this issue at the TBT Committee meetings in February and June 2021, and India responded that it was reviewing comments received. The United States wishes to reiterate our main concerns, and we ask that India please provide a more detailed response and update on the status of the proposed regulation. The draft regulation states that India may identify categories of "risk" for food products "from time to time… for which inspection or audit of fore ign food manufacturing facilities producing such categories of foods shall be mandatory." We are concerned about the lack of detail regarding the scope of this proposed technical regulation and the scientific and technical information India will use to det ermine the specific "risk" for food product categories. We again ask that India please provide further information on this measure and its plan for implementation. 2.155. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to highlight its strong concerns with this Indian measure. Many questions for foreign food manufacturers and competent authorities remain unanswered, which would create an unpredictable trading environment. Most importantly, the proposed stand ards appear much more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil the intended food safety objectives. We sent you written comments and are still waiting for a written reply. I want to highlight our main elements of concern: The transition period is too sho rt and should be extended to 18 months. India should further clarify the scope of products/food categories. A list of low -risk products should be defined that should be exempted. An example would be wines and spirits due to their inherent stable nature. In spections and audit of foreign food manufacturing facilities as well as registration need to be clarified and 48 For previous statements follow the thread u nder ID 667 . G/TBT/M/85 - 42 - simplified. We understand that FSSAI has adopted and published very recently, on 10 November 2021 a revised, final version which will become appli cable as of June 2022. The revised text mentions that the registration obligation would only apply to food (and drink) products presenting a specific risk, but there is no list of such products in the rules themselves. Could India please clarify that produ cts which are inherently stable and do not present sanitary risks such as spirits or wine, will be excluded from the scope of these new obligations? 2.156. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement. The delegation of Mexico refers to the Draft Food Safety and Standards (Import) Amendment Regulation notified by the Government of India on 25 November 2020 to the Members of this Committee in document G/TBT/N/IND/180 . The delegat ion of Mexico has requested further information and clarification regarding the scope of this measure at the past two meetings of this Committee, and today we find ourselves obliged to repeat this request. The measure is highly relevant to the industry and Government of Mexico, which is why, considering that the delegation of India had indicated in its statement at the Committee meeting in June that the comments received from stakeholders were being examined, the delegation of Mexico requests up -to-date inf ormation regarding the status of this examination and it would like to know how the concerns that have been raised in this forum will be considered and addressed. The delegation of Mexico thanks the delegation of India for giving its consideration to this statement and reiterates the importance of maintaining transparent channels of communication to allow concerns to be addressed in an efficient manner. 2.157. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia recognizes the right of the I ndian Government to take measures necessary to protect food safety and public health. Australia thanks India for its recent engagement on this issue during a bilateral technical discussion with Australia. Australia respectfully recommends the regulation be amended to clarify the categories of food included. The proposed measures should be linked to the risks posed by the imported food. Australia is happy to work with India to support a more risk -based approach to food safety. 2.158. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada would like to reiterate concerns raised at the February and June 2021 TBT Committee meetings regarding India's draft amendment to its Food Safety Standards (Import) Amendment Regulation pertaining to the registration, inspection and/or audit of foreign food manufacturing facilities producing food products destined for India. While Canada recognizes India's right to take necessary measures to protect public health and safety, a number of elements contained in India's pr oposed amendments remain ambiguous. As previously stated, it is unclear what criteria would be used to determine the level of risk for food products imported into India, what circumstances would instigate an audit or an inspection of a foreign manufacturin g facility or, how such actions will be taken given the ongoing travel restrictions resulting from the pandemic. In addition, Canada remains concerned with the measure's target commodities, source -countries, implementation plan, audit rates, compliance actions and appeals. We are of the view that India's approach in these areas could create unnecessary obstacles to trade. Canada is disappointed that India has yet to respond to comments submitted to India's Enquiry Point on 21 January 2021. We would apprecia te if India could inform when it expects to provide the requested details. In closing, Canada recalls its request to India to notify these amendments to the SPS Committee given that India's proposed regulation covers food safety measures aimed at protectin g human health and safety. 2.159. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement. Argentina wishes to reiterate the concerns raised during the previous meeting of the Committee. As we have already stated, my country has a number of doubts about giving effect to and implementing the provisions contained in the draft standard notified in document G/TBT/N/IND/180 , particularly with regard to the products covered and the provisions on registration, inspection and audit of exporting establishments. All our questions have been duly submitted through India's TBT Focal Point and we are yet to receive the corresponding clarifications. We hope to receive them as soon as possible and also hope that this new standard does not become an unjustified restriction, in order to ensure that trade with India, a highly important trading partner for our country's agricultural sector, is not affected. 2.160. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan shares the concerns on India's proposed draft amendment regulation on food safe ty and standards. While the regulation would impose additional burdens on business operators who export to India, there are many unclear points yet to be sufficiently explained by India including definitions of "food manufacturing facility", scope of "food " subject to the draft regulation, and registration procedure of the facility inspection G/TBT/M/85 - 43 - and audit. Japan would like India to make TBT and SPS notification and provide WTO Members with the opportunity to make comments on the detailed regulation regarding t he scope of food, the facilities registration procedure and so forth. Moreover, Japan emphasises the importance to have sufficient transition period before the implementation of the new rules. Japan's position is that the transitional period of 180 days fr om publication in the Official Gazette is still not sufficient. Japan recommends that the transition period be extended to more than 18 months. Japan urges India to sincerely address Members' concerns and comments to ensure the proposed new rule does not create unnecessary trade barriers. 2.161. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. At this time, the comments received from various stakeholders are being examined. Once we have a fuller examination, we will get back to all the in terested Members. 2.1.3.14 Mexico - Conformity Assessment Procedure under Mexican Official Standard NOM -223-SCFI/SAGARPA - 2018, "Cheese Names, Specifications, Commercial Information, and Test Methods," published on 31 January 2019, G/TBT/N/MEX/465 (ID 67849) 2.162. The representative of the United States provided t he following statement. The United States appreciates a bilateral held with Mexico on this issue yesterday. We are submitting our statement from the last meeting since the standard and the conformity assessment procedure is under consideration in the Mexic an system so as a place -marker we are going to submit our previous statement50 and we look forward to the continued discussion within the Committee and Mexico. 2.163. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union w ould like to join this trade concern, as some aspects of the conformity assessment procedure established by the Procedure for the Evaluation of Conformity of the Official Mexican Standard NOM - 223, would cause difficulties for EU exporters. The EU thanks fo r the information provided bilaterally by Mexico and would like to ask about the state of play of the ongoing revision of the conformity assessment procedure (CAP) for the Mexican Official Standard NOM -223-SCFI/SAGARPA -2018 on cheese, in particular the tim eline for the notification to the WTO TBT Committee and the public consultation process. We would appreciate a possibility to work bilaterally with Mexico to find a satisfactory solution. 2.164. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Au stralia would like to reiterate its concerns that Mexico's measure notified as G/TBT/N/MEX/465 appears discriminatory and more trade restrictive than necessary. We note we are yet to receive a response from Mexico to the comments we submitted on Mexico's notification detailing our concerns and welcome Mexico's consideration of, and response to them in the near future. Australia looks forward to continuing our successful trade relationship with Mexico. 2.165. In response, the representative of Mexico provided the following statement. As rei terated by the Government of Mexico in this forum and in this Organization's Council for Trade in Goods, this measure was developed to address issues and concerns related to the authenticity of products called "cheese" marketed in Mexican territory and the information consumers receive about them, and to prevent misleading practices. As for the status of this measure, the Mexican authorities are still conducting a comprehensive analysis of this procedure in light of its international commitments, in order t o achieve a balance in the regulation while fulfilling the legitimate objective pursued. In this vein, a new version of the procedure will be notified to the Members of this Committee for public consultation in the coming months. The delegation of Mexico r eiterates its willingness to keep transparent channels of communication open to clarify any doubts that the Members of this Committee may have and to provide information on any progress made via the relevant contact points. 49 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 678 . 50 G/TBT/M/84 , paras. 4.135 -4.139. G/TBT/M/85 - 44 - 2.1.3.15 Thailand - Ministerial Regulatio n Prescribing Description, Production, and Method of Displaying of Standard Marks on the Industrial Products, G/TBT/N/THA/577 , G/TBT/N/THA/577/Add.1 (ID 67251) 2.166. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States appreciates Thailand's continued extension o f the date of enforcement of its Ministerial Regulation prescribing the description, production, and method of displaying of Standard Marks on its Industrial Products. US industry submitted several comments through the US and Thai Enquiry Points beginning in October 2020, through January 2021. We appreciate the exchange through that mechanism and Thailand's willingness to engage bilaterally on this issue. However, the United States continues to have concerns regarding the QR code requirements provided in th e regulations. We encourage Thailand to consider other approaches that may meet consumer protection goals in a less trade-disruptive manner. In particular, a voluntary e -labelling approach in line with international best practices and standards should be c onsidered. A voluntary e -labelling programme can help consumers discover important information without unnecessarily raising compliance costs and slowing time to market. We understand that TISI indicated that proof of paperwork factory inspection can only be used once. We encourage Thailand to reconsider as this duplicative and burdensome approach would require a new inspection and fee for each shipment without actually improving the safety or quality of the products. We further understand that the price of a paperwork factory inspection is almost three times higher than the usual onsite factory inspection price. Can TISI please provide more explanation about this cost structure and explain the difference in scope and objectives between these two inspection processes? 2.167. We appreciate TISI's flexibility regarding the labelling requirement for small batteries. However, we request that TISI simplify the requirements for the TISI logo and QR code for use on small AV products. We also request that TISI remove the re quirement for the importer's name to be imprinted on the power cord. If this requirement is to be maintained, efforts should be made to minimize the logistical and cost impact of this requirement, such as simplifying the requirements for the importer's nam e to be listed on a paper tag rather than moulded or labelled on the power cord. The United States asks Thailand to continue to examine the regulation and consider less trade - disruptive conformity assessment and labelling requirements to meet Thailand's ob jective of consumer protection. 2.168. In response, the representative of Thailand provided the following statement. Thailand would like to thank the United States for comments to the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Description, Production and Method of Displa ying of Standard Marks on the Industrial Products B.E.2563 (2020) and related matters. The Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Description, Production and Method of Displaying of Standard Marks on the Industrial Products B.E.2563 is necessary to be promulga ted to fulfil legitimate objective under the scope of the TBT Agreement, Article 2.2, the purpose of which is to prevent deceptive practices and consumer protection. The ministerial regulation stipulates that the electronic information shall be displayed c learly visible, prominently and indelibly on industrial products. In case where the electronic information cannot be displayed on the industrial products, the regulation is allowed to display on a package, a container, wrapper or binder in order to facilit ate the manufacturing process. The regulation has been enforced since 20 July 2021 after 180 days extension for manufacturers' preparation. After enforcement, Thailand has received many views from both manufacturers and consumers which reflect that the dis play of electronic information meet its purpose, to prevent deceptive practices and to protect consumers. However, in case the United States needs our clarification on the ministerial regulation and related matters, we would like to propose a constructive dialogue with the United States for our better understanding. 2.1.3.16 India - Refrigerating Appliances (Quality Control) Order, 2020, G/TBT/N/IND/173 (ID 67152) 2.169. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea would like to appreciate India for responding to comments related to the Refrigerating Appliances (Quality Control) Order, 2020 of India at the WTO TBT Committees in February and June 2021. However, Korea would like to make some additional comments regarding this Refrigerating Appliances QCO as follo ws. First, factory inspections by the BIS are not being conducted outside India at all, so the manufacturing factories located in other countries outside India are having difficulties with the 51 For previous st atements follow the thread under ID 672 . 52 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 671 . G/TBT/M/85 - 45 - factory inspection. Accordingly, Korea would like to request an additional grace period, or a non - face-to-face factory inspection plan for overseas factories that need BIS certification. Second, we have previously requested that the High Voltage Test Time specified in the Indian Standard IS 1476 (Part1):2000 Clause 14 .8 and IS 15750:2006 Clause 19.8 be revised from two seconds to one second. At the June 2021 Committee meeting, we received a response from India that the industry would be able to adapt to the Indian standards because there is enough time between the noti fication date and the implementation date of the regulations. However, apart from the adaptation period, there are still difficulties in responding to the regulation because the High Voltage Test Time specified in IS 1476 (Part1):2000 Clause 14.8 and IS 15 750:2006 Clause 19.8 deviates from the relevant international standard (IEC 60335 -1). Therefore, we reiterate our request that India revises its standards to harmonize with the international standard. In addition, Korea also requests that India's Refrigera ting Appliances (Quality Control) Order, 2020 be implemented after the revision of Indian standards are completed and an appropriate transition period is provided. 2.170. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. The standards are chosen after due stakeholder consultation, including industry associations. As per the note in QCO notified in the gazette, "the latest version of Indian Standards including the amendments issued thereof, as notified by the Bureau of Indian Standards from time to time, shall apply from the date as notified by the Bureau". The QCO was notified on 10 December 2020 with an implementation date of 1 January 2022 thus providing sufficient time for the industry to prepare. 2.1.3.17 European Union - Draft EU Batteries Regu lation (implementation of the European Green Deal), G/TBT/N/EU/775 (ID 68553) 2.171. The representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement. The Russian Federation reiterates its statement made during the previous meeting of the Committee on TBT. The Russian Federatio n expresses deep concern on the draft EU Regulation on batteries and waste batteries that is developed in order to implement the European Green Deal. It sets out product requirements for new batteries as a condition for access to the EU market as well as m aterial recovery targets for waste batteries. For new batteries the draft Regulation specifically sets requirements on the maximum level of carbon footprint over the life cycle of batteries and minimum level of recycled materials such as cobalt, lithium an d nickel. Apparently, the requirements for the minimum level of recycled materials in batteries is aimed to reduce use of primary metals in the EU for the purpose of battery manufacturing. It is no secret that the EU does not have sufficient capacities of primary non -ferrous metals in its territory in order to meet domestic demand. By introducing provision that discriminates imported primary materials vis -à-vis domestically remanufactured, the draft Regulation is aiming to substitute imported primary metals for the like domestically recycled ones. This is protectionist aim which we reject as a legitimate one. Article 2.2 of the Agreement on TBT requires Members to ensure that technical regulations are not developed, adopted and implemented in a manner more t rade restrictive than necessary to fulfill legitimate objectives. The article also requires that technical regulations do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade. In this regard, we are wondering if the European Union considered less trade restrictive measures to stimulate recycling of nickel, lithium, cobalt, copper and lead rather than such administrative measure as minimum level of recycled materials in the battery. If yes, please name the measures that the EU has considered and reasons w hy these measures have not been employed or proposed for implementation. 2.172. Current draft Regulation provisions on recycling efficiencies and minimum requirement of recycled materials targets five metals – cobalt, copper, lead, lithium and nickel. We are wond ering what criteria have been used by the European Commission to choose these particular five metals. As far as requirement on maximum level of carbon footprint over the life cycle of batteries is concerned, there is no comprehensive methodology to calcula te this parameter. Moreover, the draft Regulation does not specify the ways for the stakeholders from outside the EU to submit their data and calculations made under internationally recognized protocols, which are likely to be different from the EU standar ds. As a result, the lack of methodological clarity as well as the unresolved recognition issue unfairly penalizes non -EU battery value chain economic operators and constitutes a technical barrier to trade. Finally, the Russian Federation is concerned with many elements of the European Green Deal and implementing legal acts. One of the objectives of the Deal is import substitution which goes against the spirit of the WTO. Russia urges the EU to stick to the WTO law 53 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 685 . G/TBT/M/85 - 46 - and develop all climate and ecological mea sures in cooperation with its trading partners and other Members of the organization. 2.173. The representative of China provided the following statement. 1. In accordance with Article 7 and Annex II, the carbon footprint of rechargeable industrial batteries and electric vehicle batteries with internal storage and capacity above 2 kWh is required. However, there is no unified international calculation criteria or basis for the carbon footprint of such products, therefore the equitable and scientific assessment is hard to carry out. Besides, as industrial batteries are widely used, and of various types, it is difficult to make a unified footprint calculation. Therefore, China thinks it is not the right time to carry out those works. 2. Regarding the recycled content in active materials from batteries in Article 8, it is suggested to cancel the "Minimum share of recycled content" at the current stage, and to consider it after the methodology of the calculation and verification is set up. For industrial batteries, elec tric vehicle batteries and automobile batteries, the regulations set the minimum share of cobalt, lead, lithium or nickel recycled from waste present in active materials by 2030 and 2035, but the methodology for the calculation and verification of the recy cled materials will not be set out until the end of 2025. In addition, companies in China also considered that the recycled proportion of cobalt is relatively high. 3. It is suggested that the EU cancels the disclosure of the technical documents containing commercial secrets of enterprises on the premise that regulatory purpose has already been met. Article 7, article 8 and appendix 2, appendix 13 require to provide the technical information, but the technical information about the battery content, the material and processing process involves some core secrets, such as the content of cobalt, nickel, lithium contained in batteries, and data about carbon emissions of materials in the process of production, which increases the risk of disclosure. 2.174. 4. China sugge sts that the EU re -evaluates these performance indexes before formulating scientific and reasonable product performance index requirements. 5. China suggests that when the EU conducts the supply chain due diligence investigation, consult with the relevant market regulatory authorities of other parties at first, and then carry out investigation only upon the agreement reached by both parties through consultation. 6. China thinks that it is not reasonable to set the date of entry into force as of 1 January 20 22, because the publication date of this regulation is uncertain and more time is also needed to complete the general legislative process in the EU. Besides, the new labelling requirements in the regulation involve changes in hardware equipment, and the re lated technical documentation also needs some time to be prepared, which imposes a great burden on manufactures, it is recommended that the EU provides a transitional period of at least 12 months or more for manufacturers with a view to ensuring business c ontinuity of the enterprise. 2.175. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to recall that the Batteries Regulation proposal was presented on 10 December 2020 and notified to the WTO on 26 January 2021 with a commenting period of 90 days. During the commenting period, the EU rec eived written comments from China, Japan and Canada to which the EU replied on 18 October 2021. Regarding some of the general issues raised by the delegations of China and Russia, the EU would like to remind that batteries are an important source of energy and one of the key enablers for sustainable development, green mobility, clean energy and climate neutrality. In order for the EU's product policies to contribute to these objectives, it needs to be ensured that batteries marketed and sold in the EU are s ourced and manufactured in a sustainable manner. Thus, batteries are essential for the energy transition, helping to achieve climate neutrality. However, at the same time the raw material acquisition, pre -processing, manufacturing, distribution and recycli ng of batteries causes greenhouse gas emissions and to a certain extent offset those benefits of batteries. The EU carefully considered how to address this and the draft Regulation introduces progressive requirements to minimise the carbon footprint over t he life cycle of batteries. Accordingly, the EU opted for a step -wise approach of first detailing the calculation rules based on the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, then requiring reporting, after that comparative labelling, and only at the l ast stage applying a maximum life cycle carbon footprint threshold. The EU has chosen the PEF method because, among the different existing life cycle assessment approaches, it is the one that the EU considers guarantees the highest level of reproducibility , comparability and verifiability of the results. Moreover, it has gone through a multi -year road testing phase (2013 -2018), involving about 300 companies of different sizes and located in different parts of the world. 2.176. The introduction of minimum levels of recycled content of cobalt, lead, lithium and nickel in batteries is part of the EU's effort to foster the circular economy and have markets for secondary raw materials work efficiently. The EU has estimated the availability of such materials recovered G/TBT/M/85 - 47 - from waste by 2030 and 2035 on the basis of the best available evidence and information. The EU has included the possibility to adjust the targets in 2027 should trends in availability differ significantly from those estimates. Moreover, the EU would like to reassure that there will be sufficient time to consider the feedback received on the notified draft prior to adoption. Implementing and delegated acts that will be developed under the notified draft will involve consultation of stakeholders, though the ex act way in which this will be done is to be determined in each case. Drafts of those implementing measures and delegated acts will be notified to the WTO in accordance with the TBT Agreement. The application dates for some of the provisions in the notified draft are relatively soon. This is because significant developments in the battery sector are taking place in the near future. However, the EU would like to clarify that the indicated application dates are provisional, because it will depend on the time n eeded for the regulatory process to adopt the notified draft. In conclusion, the EU stresses that the notified draft seeks to fulfil multiple, interlinked objectives including the protection of the environment and human health and safety, all of which are legitimate policy objectives under Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement. For the reasons specified above, the EU considers that the notified draft is not more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil these legitimate policy objectives, taking into account th e risks that non -fulfilment would create. Regarding Article 2.1 of TBT Agreement, the EU does not consider that the notified measure gives rise to a risk of discrimination within the meaning of that provision. The notified draft therefore fully complies with the provisions of the TBT Agreement. 2.1.3.18 EU - Phosmet, G/TBT/N/EU/790 (ID 70354) 2.177. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile appreciates the opportunity to comment in this Committee on the EU's notification submitted to the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers t o Trade in document G/TBT/N/ EU/790 , which concerns the non -renewal of the approval of the pesticide active substance phosmet under Regulation (EU) No. 1107/2009 on the reduction or definitive elimination of the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for this substance in food, as well as on t he responses that the EU provided through the WTO TBT enquiry point following the meeting in June, during which this STC was raised. Gowan Chile, the agrochemical company applying for the import tolerance and the representative of phosmet in Chile through the Chilean Fruit Exporters Association, has reported that the EU's review process for MRLs will take approximately one year and that the MRLs are expected to be reduced to the limit of analytical determination (LOD) by the end of 2022. We have been inform ed that the MRLs for phosmet or the import tolerances may be maintained in the EU only if the toxicological parameters, the acceptable daily intake (ADI) and acute reference dose (ARfD) change. Gowan has toxicological data that were not reviewed by the Rap porteur Member State (RMS) and by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), with this data demonstrating that a higher value can be established for the ADI and the ARfD, which will allow for the dietary risk assessments for phosmet to be approved. Gowan h as already asked the Commission to order EFSA to evaluate all the available published toxicological data, as it did for other active substances in the EU, but the Commission has thus far refused to do so. Chile will continue to monitor how this STC may evo lve in the EU and would be grateful if our delegation could be kept informed through the TBT enquiry point. 2.178. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil would like to support the STC raised by Chile against the European Union regar ding the Draft Commission Implementing Regulation concerning the non -renewal of approval of the active substance phosmet, notified as G/TBT/N/EU/790 . Phosmet is registered in Brazil as an active substance for insecticides and acaricides used on citrus, apple and peach. It is recogniz ed as an important crop protection tool used by Brazilian citrus growers to treat citrus fruit borer, fruit flies and citrus psyllid pests. The non - renewal of the approval of this active substance, coupled with the following reduction of its MRL, will have a significant impact on trade and will be particularly harmful towards the citrus industry in Brazil, where citrus is the main source of income to thousands of farmers living in the countryside. The European Union is the top destination of Brazilian citru s products with over US$1.13 billion of export value in the 2019 -2020 marketing year. Brazil would also like to kindly ask the EU to adopt new MLRs that are in line with the limits defined by Codex Alimentarius. 2.179. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. On 29 June 2021, the European Union answered the written comments submitted by Chile following the EU notification to the TBT Committee of the non -renewal of the approv al of phosmet. As explained in the EU written reply, following a comprehensive and transparent assessment of the information 54 For previous stateme nts follow the thread under ID 703 . G/TBT/M/85 - 48 - submitted by the applicant carried out by the designated rapporteur member State and peer - reviewed by all other member States and t he European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), serious risks and concerns in relation to human health and the environment have been identified. It is therefore considered that the applicant has not demonstrated that plant protection products containing phosmet can be used safely. We can inform you that the member States' vote on the Commission proposal not to renew the approval of phosmet will take place in the meeting of 1 -2 December 2021 of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (SCoPAFF). Th e EU notes that the non-renewal of the approval of phosmet does not lead to immediate disruptions in trade, as the measure itself does not amend the existing Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs). The non -renewal of the approval of phosmet will lead to the withdra wal of authorizations for plant protection products (PPPs) containing phosmet in EU member States and to the lowering of the current EU MRLs to the limit of quantification. The procedure for lowering MRLs will only start after the expiry of the grace periods for use of products containing phosmet (nine months after the date of the entry into force of the non -renewal act). Furthermore, as already explained in the TBT notification form, any action to reduce MRLs in the future will be subject to a separate not ification under the WTO/SPS procedure. 2.180. Whether MRLs currently established based on earlier import tolerance requests or based on Codex MRLs will remain unchanged, will depend on the outcome of the forthcoming MRLs review by EFSA, which will be launched in the beginning of 2022. In case the Chilean or Brazilian authorities consider it necessary to ensure that MRLs for phosmet on relevant crops remain or should be newly set at a level that is sufficient to facilitate trade, they may wish to submit an applicat ion for setting import tolerances according to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/200555 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin accompanied by the required data. If submitted early enough, the application will be thoroughly assessed by EFSA at the same time as the MRLs review mentioned above and, if the data provided are complete and there is no risk for consumers, such an import tolerance can be established. In case they wish to do so, the Chilean and Bra zilian authorities are invited to contact Spain, the Rapporteur member State and to ensure that the necessary information will be available in due time for the evaluation by the Rapporteur member State and EFSA. 2.1.3.19 European Union - Withdrawal of the approval of the active substance alpha - cypermethrin, G/TBT/N/EU/770 (ID 69456) 2.181. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil would like to express its concerns related to European notification G/TBT/N/EU/770 regarding the Commission Implementing Regulation proposal to withdraw the approval of th e active substance alpha - cypermethrin. Alpha -cypermethrin is registered in Brazil as an insecticide used against harmful pests that damage a variety of crops, including soy, cotton, corn, citrus, watermelon, peanut, coffee, among other products exported to the European Union. If the register of said substance is withdrawn and MRLs are automatically reduced, it would significantly affect the income of Brazilian farmers, especially citrus producers. The substance is essential to control greening, a disease af fecting citrus orchards worldwide. Greening has been recognized by EFSA itself as a priority pest for control, according to the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1702. The Brazilian citrus industry plays an important role in generating jobs in the countryside. Export of orange juices to the European market represented almost US$1 billion of exports in the 2019 -2020 marketing year. Alpha - cypermethrin is also an important component to conduct integrated pest management, once it may be combined with ot her insecticides to contribute to increase their useful life, ensuring efficient pest control and maintaining the sustainability of crop production. In light of the above, Brazil would like to kindly encourage the EU to adopt MRLs for imported products in accordance with the limits set under the Codex Alimentarius. 2.182. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. Paraguay thanks Brazil and shares the concern it raised related to the withdrawal of the approval of the active substance alpha -cypermethrin by the European Union. As explained in the previous statement57, this substance is used as a systemic insecticide to control pests that attack crops of great economic importance, 55 Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 70, 16.03.2005, p. 1). 56 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 694 . 57 European Union - Non-renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb ( ID 627 ). G/TBT/M/85 - 49 - such as maize, soybean, sunflower and cotton. In this regard, Para guay stresses the importance of having duly controlled and authorized substances that have met the scientific and technical requirements required for use and have proven both effective in controlling pests and vital for the rotation of active ingredients, thereby preventing insect resistance as part of the integrated management of pests. The withdrawal of this active substance by the European Union could significantly restrict the technological substances available for proper crop management, thus having a direct impact on the national economy. In this case, as in others, the lack of risk assessment continues to limit the use of plant protection products and reduce MRLs to trade -restrictive levels. Paraguay considers that the European Union's approach to lim iting the use of pesticides is more trade-restrictive than it needs to be for it to attain its legitimate objectives under the TBT Agreement, while at the same time retaining emergency authorizations for European Union members. 2.183. In response, the representat ive of the European Union provided the following statement. As explained in the TBT Committee last June, the approval of Alpha -cypermethrin had to be withdrawn, as the Commission Implementing Regulation that renewed its approval in 2019 included the condit ion that the applicant had to submit confirmatory information as regards the toxicological profile of certain metabolites by 30 October 2020. In addition, confirmatory information had been required for three other points by other deadlines. However, in Oct ober 2020, the applicant informed the Commission that it would not submit any confirmatory data. Therefore, as the information required in accordance with Article 6(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 on plant protection products was not submitted and the a pplicant had clearly stated that he will not fulfil his regulatory obligations, the approval for Alpha -cypermethrin had to be withdrawn according to Article 21(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. Following the withdrawal decision, the EU will prepare a dra ft Regulation to lower the existing Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for Alpha -cypermethrin to the limit of quantification, and will notify it to the WTO/SPS Committee. The procedure for the lowering of the current EU MRLs will not commence before expiry of t he grace periods for use of products containing Alpha -cypermethrin. 2.184. Whether MRLs currently established based on earlier import tolerance requests or based on Codex MRLs will remain unchanged, will depend on the outcome of the forthcoming MRL review of the group of cypermethrins by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which was launched in spring 2021. If Brazil or Paraguay consider it necessary to ensure that MRLs for Alpha -cypermethrin on relevant crops remain or should be newly set at higher/differe nt levels, they may wish to submit an application for setting import tolerances according to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin. The EU would like to invite Bra zil and Paraguay to contact the relevant authorities in Belgium, the Rapporteur member State, and to ensure that the necessary information will be available in due time for the evaluation by the Rapporteur member State and EFSA. 2.1.3.20 European Union - Chemical s trategy for sustainability (implementation of the European Green Deal) (ID 69058) 2.185. The representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement. On 14 October 2020, the European Union published Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. The Str ategy is part of the European Green Deal. Implementation of Strategy can have significant worldwide trade distorting effect in a wide range of economic sectors. The Russian Federation would like to raise the following concerns in respect of this Strategy a nd its implications for foreign trade. The EU's legislation, specifically REACH/CLP, employs precautionary principle which implies strict classification decisions without available laboratory or epidemiological data. One recent example of this practice is cobalt classification under the 14th ATP to the EU CLP Regulation. The Strategy implies banning the use of the "most harmful chemicals", classified under this category in the CLP Regulation. This situation will entail restrictions and prohibitions of safe substances classified unjustifiably strictly using precautionary principle. The EU sticks to the position that once relevant scientific data is available the classification decision can be revised. However, such revision will have little practical implicat ions since manufacturers of prohibited products would stop production, revise technological processes or even go out of business. 2.186. In this context, we request that the EU answer the following questions: - Could the EU explain how described situation is supp osed to be mitigated? - Could the EU elaborate how such an approach complies with the provisions of the Agreement on TBT bearing in mind the requirements 58 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 690 . G/TBT/M/85 - 50 - of scientific justification in Article 2.2 of this Agreement? - Will the EU ban substances only in cas e their use leads to actual risks? We urge the EU to comply with its WTO obligations under the TBT Agreement when developing the legal acts implementing this strategy. 2.187. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to recall that the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability was adopted on 14 October 2020 and was not notified to the TBT Committee, as it is not a legislative proposal containing technical regulations or conformity assessmen t procedures. It does not either contain guidance for existing EU legislation. Nevertheless, the European Union provided extensive information to the Russian Federation and other Members during the last meeting of the TBT Committee in June 2021. In additio n, there has been ample opportunity for engagement with stakeholders and WTO Members during several public consultations. Moreover, the European Union would like to reiterate that any legislative proposal put forward in the context of the EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, including the proposals for the revision of the CLP and REACH Regulations, will be notified in accordance with the TBT Agreement. Therefore, the European Union considers that the Specific Trade Concern raised by Russia is not appro priate to discuss in the TBT Committee, as it does not concern legislative acts containing technical regulations or conformity assessment procedures, or guidance for existing technical regulations and conformity assessment procedures, in the EU. 2.1.3.21 Russian Fe deration - On Safety of Wheeled Vehicles (TR CU 018/2011), G/TBT/N/RUS/100 (ID 68759) 2.188. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea respects the EAEU's efforts to protect consumer safety through the amendment of vehicle regulations. Furthermore , Korean companies are fully committed to complying with the regulations of EAEU. Regarding the EAEU's regulation of "TR CU 018/2011: On Safety of Wheeled Vehicles" notified to the WTO on 20 March 2020 as G/TBT/N/RUS/100 , Korea submitted comments three times; in December 2020, Febr uary 2021, and May 2021, via the EAEU TBT Enquiry Point. Also, we held two corporate seminars between Korea and EAEU in 2020 and 2021. Through this process, a number of difficulties for Korean companies were resolved, such as deleting requirements about Ti me Errors and providing information about PSAP (Public Safety Answering Points) requirements, and Korea fully appreciates the EAEU Commission for its kind efforts. However, the Korean industry still has some difficulties left regarding EAEU's vehicle regul ation so we would like to deliver their requests at this meeting. 2.189. Firstly, regarding Attachment No.2 Item 57a, on Maximum Speed Measurement, the UN ECE R-68 regulation has not been well adopted by countries other than Russia due to the requirement of techn ical development and financial burden imposed by the addition of actual test driving with each combination of engine and transmission. Considering the little effect compared to its technical and financial burdens, we request the EAEU to retract this requir ement. If not, we ask for an exemption on existing vehicles. Secondly, regarding Attachment No.2 Item 27, on Fuel Tank and Rear Side Collision, EAEU's current regulation of Part 1 Fuel Tank Stability applies the UN R -34.02 regulation, but EAEU's amendment will be applying the higher regulation, UN R -34.03. In this case, two more certificates will be required in addition to the existing Part 1 certificate, and the scope of application will be different from Russia's current regulations. Therefore, when apply ing the UN R -34.03 under the amendment, we request EAEU to clarify whether or not the application is limited to Part 1 as the current regulation. And if limited to Part 1, please specify that "application limited to Part 1 (or 4)" or "it is not compulsory in Part 2" as the EU does. Alternatively, for Part 2 -2 (on Rear Side Collision), we request to adopt UN R -153 (Rear Side Collision) and specify that "R -34.03 applies only to Part 1". 2.190. In response, the representative of the Russian Federation provided the fo llowing statement. With regards to the procedural aspect of Korean comments, we note that draft amendments No. 3 to the technical regulation on safety of wheeled vehicles were notified by the Russian Federation to the WTO in March 2020 with commenting peri od of 60 days as per the provisions of the Agreement on TBT. All comments submitted within due time period were gathered and taken into account. Korean comments were received with long delay well outside commenting period. As far as content of the suggesti ons is concerned, we note that these suggestions are highly technical and many of 59 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 687 . G/TBT/M/85 - 51 - them put forward in the Committee for the first time hence we will forward them to Moscow for consideration and appropriate action. 2.1.3.22 Brazil - Draft Ordinance Act Nº. 374, 27 N ovember 2014 (Portaria SDA/MAPA 374/2014) Establishes quality requirements for wine and derivatives of grape and wine, G/TBT/N/BRA/613, G/TBT/N/BRA/613/Add.1, G/TBT/N/BRA/61 3/Rev.1, G/TBT/N/BRA/675 , G/TBT/N/BRA/ 613/Add.2 , G/TBT/N/BRA/613/Add.3 (ID 47060) 2.191. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to thank to Brazil for notifying the draft Technical Regulation on the identity and quality standards for wines and deriv atives of grape and wine and to appreciate the opportunity to submit written comments. In many past TBT Committees, the European Union had been raising concerns in relation to the Brazilian regulation on wine, which create unnecessary obstacles to internat ional trade. From the preliminary analysis of the notified draft, it seems that the ongoing revision would further enlarge the already long list of analytical parameters, many of them diverging from recommendations of the International Organisation of Vine and Wine, and would not resolve the longstanding issue of the classification of sparkling wine according to sugar content. In this context, the European Union would like to encourage Brazil to seek international consensus within the OIV framework on issue s relevant to our bilateral trade, such as categories of sparkling wines related to sugar content, import documentary evidence and list of analytical parameters for imports. The European Union appreciates the efforts previously demonstrated by Brazil to fa cilitate the implementation of its wine regulations for importers. However, Brazil is invited to make use to the maximum extent possible of the recommendations of the OIV when revising the relevant technical regulations and to remove the current requiremen ts that are not in line with the OIV standards on identity and quality of wine and on maximum content limits. The European Union is prepared to work bilaterally with Brazil with regard to the ongoing revision and to note that detailed written comments on t he notified draft are currently under preparation. 2.192. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States thanks Brazil for notifying the revised draft ordinance that establishes the identity and quality standards for w ine and derivatives of grape and wine to the WTO. The United States looks forward to receiving a substantive reply to our bilateral comments. The United States is concerned about the analytical parameters for wine included in the draft ordinance and Techni cal Regulation No. 75. Of particular concern are the required analyses for potassium sulfate and methanol, which are unnecessary and cost prohibitive for exporters. Additionally, the United States seeks a justification from Brazil as to why it set a maximu m sulfite content for certain wines at a level lower than what has been adopted by Codex. With regards to Technical Regulation No. 75, the United States remains concerned about the duplicative testing requirements. We hope Brazil will consider our comments on the draft ordinance and reduce its analytical requirements to facilitate trade in wine. 2.193. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. The delegation of Chile is pleased to be able to comment on Brazil's notifications. Chile recognizes t he importance of safeguarding the legitimate objectives of safety and security in the area of human health in the wine trade, as well as of seeking to avoid creating unnecessary obstacles to trade. Our country has thus made progress in the recognition of o enological practices with the majority of producing and exporting countries, and has also simplified the certification requirements, in particular: With regard to reducing the number of laboratory analyses that are not related to health and safety aspects, there is an understanding that the wines meet the national standards that require extensive quality and safety parameters to be met beforehand in order for authorization to produce and export to be obtained. In Chile, we do this with respect to quality pa rameters such as dryness and a number of others, for which reason we suggest that Brazil's standards be adapted to international models, particularly in relation to sugar, so that the country may take this opportunity to modernize its regulations in these respects. Chile appreciates the opportunity to comment on these notifications submitted by Brazil to the TBT committee and looks forward to closely following the evolution in Brazil of the proposed regulations contained therein. 2.194. In response, the representa tive of Brazil provided the following statement. MAPA Ordinance No. 346, published on 1 July 2021, opened public consultations regarding a draft regulation that establishes identity and quality standards, as well as complementary rules for labelling and production process of wine and grape -derived wines. In response to the requests of many 60 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 470 . G/TBT/M/85 - 52 - stakeholders, Brazil decided to extend time for comments by establishing a new public consultation with the same draft regulation, which was later notified as G/TBT/N/BRA/613/Add.3 and is open until 7 December. We understand that the definition of quality parameters for wine has been a long - standing concern raised by our trade partners in the TBT Committee. All of the requirements resulting from this regulatory process will be applicabl e to national and foreign producers alike, following transparency and non -discrimination obligations established by the TBT Agreement. Brazil is open to engage bilaterally with each and every Member so as to understand their specific concerns regarding thi s draft regulation and its alignment with relevant international standards. 2.1.3.23 Indonesia - Halal Product Assurance Law No. 33 of 2014 and its implementing regulations, G/TBT/N/IDN/123, G/TBT/N/IDN/131, G/TBT/N/IDN/131/Add.1, G/TBT/N/IDN/134 (ID 50261) 2.195. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States appreciates the significant bilateral with Indonesia last evening and I will submit comments through a W document.62 2.196. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The Europea n Union reiterates its serious concerns on the Indonesian Halal Product Guarantee Law No 33 of September 2014 and its implementing provisions, which require mandatory Halal certification and labelling for a very wide range of products to be placed on the I ndonesian market, resulting in significant obstacles to EU trade with Indonesia. The EU regrets that, contrary to Article 2.9 of the WTO TBT Agreement, Indonesia failed to notify to the TBT Committee the Halal Product Guarantee Law, and that it only notifi ed Regulation 57/2021 on Halal fees on 3 November 2021, after its adoption and entry into force on 3 June 2021. The EU encourages Indonesia to notify any relevant technical measures when still in draft form and to provide sufficient time for comments, in accordance to the WTO TBT Agreement. The EU kindly invites Indonesia to reply to its comments on several implementing provisions. Indonesia has not replied to EU comments of 12 May 2020 on Regulation 31/2018 on Processed Food Labelling (G/TBT/N/IDN/124), EU comments of 20 April 2021 on the draft Government Regulation (RPP) 39/2021 on Halal Product Assurance implementing the Omnibus Bill on Job Creation (G/TBT/N/IDN/131), and the recent EU comments of 31 August 2021 on the draft Decree regarding types of prod ucts and consumer goods to be Halal -certified (G/TBT/N/IDN/134). As regards this last measure, the EU regrets that Indonesia published Decree No. 748 of 2021 on Types of Products Mandatory to be Halal Certified on 29 June 2021, before its notification to t he TBT Committee on 2 July 2021, and before the period of two months for comments had expired. The Decree will take effect as from 1 January 2022. 2.197. We EU stress the excessive restrictive impact on trade of the measures in question and we invite Indonesia to consider less restrictive alternatives to mandatory Halal certification and labelling, in order to pursue the legitimate objective of ensuring reliable information without unduly hindering trade flows. The main issues of concern for the EU in the Halal La w and implementing measures are, among others, the "non -Halal" information requested for non -Halal products or the extension of Halal requirements to products other than food and beverages. Furthermore, in order to ensure the workability of the system for foreign operators, there is a need for more clarity and a pragmatic approach as regards the requirements for recognition by Indonesia of foreign Halal certificates. In particular, we consider that the pre -condition of a government -to-government mutual reco gnition arrangement for recognition by Indonesia of foreign Halal certification bodies represents an excessive burden for industry and economic operators and does not allow for smooth trade relations. The additional registration requirement for Halal certi fications of certain products by foreign bodies also appears to be unjustified, costly and duplicative. In addition, the EU is concerned about the possibility of imposing much higher Halal certification fees for goods and services from foreign business (15 0% more than the baseline fee for services), provided for in Article 8 of Indonesian Regulation 57/2021 on Halal fees. The EU stresses the importance of ensuring the continued possibility to place non -Halal products on the Indonesian market and urges Indon esia to review these measures with a view at adopting a more trade -friendly approach. Notably, the EU firmly calls upon Indonesia to: - limit Halal requirements to food and beverages; - avoid the excessively burdensome requirement for mandatory "non -Halal" information as regards non -Halal products, and - provide flexibility for the recognition of foreign Halal certification bodies and the acceptance of 61 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 502 . 62 G/TBT/W/761 . G/TBT/M/85 - 53 - foreign certificates. The EU reiterates its willingness to further discuss and cooperate on Halal issues with Indonesia, with the aim of finding a practical way forward and solve trade concerns. 2.198. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia welcomes ongoing discussions on the Indonesian Halal Product Assurance Law no. 33 of 2014 (Halal Law) and continues to seek for the law to be implemented transparently and in close communication with businesses and trading partners. We encourage Indonesia to continue to facilitate an open dialogue with trading partners to allow foreign business es and their valued Indonesian importers to remain adequately informed of Halal Law implementation regulations. Australia is eager to ensure that our existing halal assurance processes will continue to be recognized when the grace period for Law 33/2014 en ds in 2024 and welcomes Indonesia's clarification of this. Australia appreciated the opportunity to provide formal comments on Indonesia's latest Decree on Types of Products and Consumer Goods Products Mandatory to be Halal Certified, notified to the TBT C ommittee on 2 July 2021 (G/TBT/N/IDN/134). Australia looks forward to Indonesia's response to our submission and welcomes clarification about the methodology for products and services included on the list. Australia thanks Indonesia for its response to Aus tralia's comments on notification G/TBT/N/IDN/131 on Government Regulation 39/2021 on The Organization of Halal Product Assurance. However, it is concerning that Regulation 39 entered into force before these comments were considered by Indonesia. Australia would like to emphasise t he importance of adherence to the rules -based WTO process for a productive and fair international trade environment. Australia welcomes advice from Indonesia on its approach to developing additional regulations to implement the Halal Law, and further dialo gue on the Halal Law to ensure its implementation is no more trade restrictive than necessary. 2.199. The representative of New Zealand provided the following statement. New Zealand would like to thank Indonesia for its ongoing engagement to date regarding this m atter. We ask for some clarity on the status of Overseas Halal Certification Organisations whose certification will soon expire or has already expired with MUI, and whether there are any transitory arrangements in place for them to continue to certify befo re the conclusion of Mutual Recognition Arrangements or other agreements. We appreciate any further information from Indonesia as to whether there are any other regulations relating to Halal under development. We understand that the halal certification fees will need to be set in a Ministry of Finance regulation, and welcome any further clarification on this. With regard to the recently -released Ministry of Religious Affairs regulations 748/2021, can Indonesia please clarify the process by which items are a dded to the appendix listing the type of product that is obliged to be Halal certified? The regulation reads that the head of BPJPH is obliged to include a product on the list if a business actor has applied for Halal certification for a non -listed product . Will there be a grace period after products are added to the list that will allow other business actors enough time to apply for Halal certification? Can Indonesia clarify the mechanism by which the updated list will be notified publicly? 2.200. The representat ive of Canada provided the following statement. While Canada supports Indonesia's objective of ensuring high -quality halal -certified goods for its citizens, Canada remains concerned that several provisions under the Halal Product Assurance Law regulations are more trade restrictive than necessary to achieve that objective. Clarification on many aspects of how the Halal Product Assurance will be implemented under the halal regulations has not been provided. For example, it will be important for exporters to obtain clarification around how foreign halal certification bodies will be recognized or accredited and technical elements such as what is considered "processing", which triggers the halal certification requirement. We encourage Indonesia to issue detailed guidance as soon as possible to enable Canadian goods to be halal certified and subsequently exported to Indonesia. Canadian producers want to continue supplying high -quality halal certified and naturally halal products to the Indonesian market. Canada ur ges Indonesia to consider how its stated requirement for a Government -to-Government Memorandum of Understanding prior to recognizing foreign halal certification is inappropriate for countries, such as Canada, where there is no governmental mandate to overs ee halal certification. This requirement creates a clear commercial advantage for countries that do have government oversight. Therefore, Canada requests that Indonesia consider allowing reasonable alternatives to the MOU requirement. Canada is seeking to engage bilaterally with Indonesia, in particular with the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency (BPJPH), in order to clarify the MoU requirement and we look forward to a constructive discussion. 2.201. The representative of Chile provided the following statem ent. Chile supports the STC raised by the USA and the EU, since it is concerned about the slow progress in the process to recognize G/TBT/M/85 - 54 - Chilean certification entities at the Halal Products Certification Agency (BPJPH) and the effects that this has on trade in certified products from Chile to Indonesia. 2.202. In response, the representative of Indonesia provided the following statement. Indonesia would like to refer to its statement on the previous TBT meeting in June. Indonesia is mindful of its transparency obligati ons as mandated in the TBT Agreement. Thus, Indonesia has notified the Government Regulation Number 39 of 2021 on Implementation of Halal Product Assurances through addendum notification G/TBT/N/IDN/131 , Types of Products Mandatory to be Halal Certified determined the types of prod ucts and consumer goods that must be halal certified through G/TBT/N/IDN/134 , and Tariff for Public Services provided by Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency through G/TBT/N/IDN/138 . We once again would also like to reiterate that there are phases or stages to implement mandatory halal certification such as for food and beverage products will be effective on 17 Oc tober 2024; while for non -food and beverage products will be effective on 17 October 2026. Furthermore, Indonesia provides a transitory provision to accommodate stakeholder and industry that obtained halal certification based on previous mechanisms, as fol lows: All forms of cooperation with foreign halal certification body and accreditation agencies in other countries that were carried out before this government regulation is made, remain in effect until the period of cooperation ends; Foreign Halal Certifi cate recognized by MUI before this Government Regulation is made, remains valid until the expiration of the validity period of the foreign Halal Certificate. Indonesia would like to reiterate its openness to international cooperation on Halal Assurance Sys tem based on the principle of mutual recognition and mutual acceptance in accordance with international regulations and practices. 2.1.3.24 European Union - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), G/TBT/N/EU/629, G/TBT/N/EU/826 (ID 53963) 2.203. The representative of the Russian Federation provided the following state ment. The Russian Federation reiterates its statements on cobalt classification as carcinogen 1 b for all routes of exposure made during the previous meetings of the Committee on TBT and the Council for Trade in Goods. First, the Russian Federation stresse s that the EU has failed to provide any scientific justification for classification of cobalt in such a strict manner. We note that there are no laboratory or epidemiological data to classify cobalt as a carcinogen for any route of exposure other than the inhalation one. Second, the laboratory study on cobalt carcinogenicity for oral route of exposure is being carried out in compliance with the REACH Regulation. This study is planned to be finished no later than 2026. However, as a result of stigmatization and/or further restrictions on cobalt use, cobalt and cobalt -containing products will suffer even in case the carcinogenicity is confirmed during further scientific studies as negative. In this regard, we urge the EU to take into account such implications and develop action plan to mitigate this situation. Finally, Russia appreciates the developments on the approval of gastric fluid bioelution protocol at the EU and the OECD levels. We are pleased to learn that discussions at the EU level are close to an en d. At the same time, we will be grateful if the EU inform the Committee how gastric bioelution will be incorporated into the EU legislation. Moreover, we would like to know whether the EU intends to notify the methodology in order to fulfill its transparen cy obligations under the Agreement on TBT. 2.204. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. In August, the European Union notified a draft regulation proposing changes to Part 3 of Annex VI of the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP), which introduce a stricter classification of reproductive toxicity to 2-ethylhexanoic acid (2 -EHA) from Repr. 2 to Repr. 1B. If adopted, the modifica tion would take effect in the first semester of 2022. The re -evaluation process was initiated in 2014, when ECHA requested new studies to be carried out, specifically an Extended One -Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS). A Substance evaluation ( SeV) process was then carried on by Spain, which recommended maintaining the previous classification of reproductive toxicity (Repr.2, H361d). At the time, the only modification suggested was the introduction of an explanatory note, which clarified the fun damentals of the classification in question. The competent authorities then opened a public consultation for the submission of comments on the dossier resulting from the SeV and additional information by authorities of other member States and members of th e private sector. During this period, Germany and France submitted a reclassification proposal to Repr. 1B, based on analysis of analogy (also called "read -across") with the substance valproic acid. The use of read -across relies on the assumption that, due to the presence of similar chemical aspects, the substances in question 63 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 539 . G/TBT/M/85 - 55 - will have similar effects when exposed to the same tests, and thus, will reveal the same toxicity. According to our private sector, this does not seem to be the case. The reproductive toxicity studies specific to 2 -EHA, which contradict the applicability of read -across with valproic acid, make up the best technical information to support the classification of reproductive toxicity, as they are a direct analysis of the substance, withou t relying on assumptions of similarity. Studies specific to 2 -EHA conclude that the most appropriate classification would be the Repr. 2, and the more restrictive classification adopted by the EU is not justified. 2.205. In addition to the higher costs associated with the registration process of chemicals classified as 1B, it is estimated that the reclassification will have a negative impact on the preferences of importers of the substance, who will have the wrong indication of its actual level of risk. We believe that, if adopted, these regulatory changes would be more trade -restrictive than necessary to fulfill the EU legitimate objectives of health protection. In light of the above, could the EU explain why it chose to adopt the read -across methodology when ther e are reproductive toxicity studies specific to 2-EHA that do not support the conclusion underlying draft regulation G/TBT/N/EU/826 ? Could the EU indicate whether it will consider not changing the classification of said substance? Does the EU consider postponing the adoption of the new reproductive toxicity classification for 2 -EHA until the competent authorities can analyze the private sector's comments on the read -across studies and the GHS standards for 2 -EHA? 2.206. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the fol lowing statement. With regard to the comments from Brazil, the EU would like to refer to its statement delivered under the STC no 264 concerning the 18th ATP. With regard to the comments from Russia, the EU recalls that the Commission Delegated Regulation amending the CLP Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the EU in the beginning of 2020 and the classification of cobalt became applicable as of 1 October 2021. As described in previous statements, the classification of cobalt is based on the independent scientific opinion of ECHA's Risk Assessment Committee (RAC), which takes into account all scientific information available, including the information from the dossier submitted by an EU member State (The Netherlands) and from the public consul tation. In addition, all comments sent to the TBT Committee were duly taken into account by the European Commission and the member States in the decision -making process. Moreover, the Commission considered that the method used to determine the Specific Con centration Limit of 0.01% should be assessed in order to discuss if the method is relevant for inorganic compounds like cobalt. For this reason, the entry in Annex VI to CLP for cobalt is without such specific limit and the generic limit of 0.1% is therefo re applied. 2.207. The EU would like to reiterate that, in line with the UN GHS (UN Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals), the classification of any substance is based on a hazard assessment and not on a risk assessment. Classif ication under the CLP Regulation is based only on the scientific assessment of the hazards derived from the intrinsic properties of a substance and not on its uses, while potential downstream legal or socio -economic considerations are not part of the principles for hazard classification. Nevertheless, the classification under the CLP Regulation does not in itself restrict the placing on the market of cobalt or cobalt -containing products. When a substance is subject to harmonized classification, only labelli ng and packaging obligations are triggered for that substance and any mixture containing it, but not for articles (e.g. cutlery or other stainless steel articles). As previously announced, on the use of the bioelution method, the EU has made progress in th e development of a harmonized approach at international level. The EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) has given a positive opinion on the scientific validity of a bioelution test met hod. On the basis of this positive opinion, the method was proposed by the European Commission in November 2019 at OECD level for acceptance as a technical guideline. In May 2020 the OECD Working Group of the National Coordinators of the Test Guidelines Pr ogramme accepted the European Commission's proposal and an OECD subgroup has been set up to work on the technical guideline. This expert group met several times and made some good progress, but discussions are still ongoing. The European Commission would w elcome any support from third countries to actively participate in the development of the OECD test method on bioelution. 64 European Union - Draft Commission Delegated Regulation amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2 008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures ID 705 G/TBT/M/85 - 56 - 2.208. Relevant industries are already using the results of the experimental bioelution test to classify their alloys in accordance with arti cle 12(b) of the CLP Regulation. No legal amendment of this article is required to use this method. The classification of alloys is not subject to harmonized classification but it is under the sole responsibility of the industry. Most probably, the compani es producing metal alloys and compounds containing cobalt traces are using such bioelution data for classifying their alloys. However, as previously announced, in order to further examine this approach and to ensure a proper use of the experimental data ob tained from the bioelution method, a European expert group has been created with the participation of experts of member States and metal industries. This expert group has met twice already and is expected to finalize its discussions in November. With regar d to the classification of cobalt as carcinogen for all routes of exposure, including the oral route, the EU would like to reiterate that the approach taken is in line with both the UN GHS and the CLP Regulation. In particular, the UN GHS stipulates the fo llowing in Table 3.6.2: Label elements for carcinogenicity: "state route of exposure if it is conclusively proven that no other routes of exposure cause the hazard". In the case of cobalt, such evidence was not available, i.e. the scientific data available were not sufficient to conclusively exclude that the oral route of exposure causes the hazard. A potential re -examination of the classification as regards routes of exposure can only be considered if new and relevant data from scientific studies, conclusi vely demonstrating the absence of carcinogenic effects from oral or dermal routes of exposure, become available. As previously stated, in view of the time needed for such test results to become available, there was no scientific and legal justification to exclude the oral route. In case new scientific information becomes available in the future, an amendment could only be envisaged following a revised Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) opinion. 2.1.3.25 European Union - Transitional periods for MRLs and international c onsultations (ID 58065) 2.209. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement. As in previous meetings, Costa Rica associates itself with the concern raised by the United States, Colombia and Guatemala, as well as with the request for extension of the period for compliance with the new tolerances that are being established for various substances, in view of the serious impact that they have on the agricultural production of our countries. It is impossible for agricultural production in Costa Ric a to adjust to new requirements or tolerances within six months, when the registration of new molecules alone must undergo a complex assessment process lasting much longer than that period. This relates to the European Union's process to revise the toleran ces for different substances used in agricultural production. In the current historical context in which the international community finds itself owing to the COVID -19 crisis, the implementation of more restrictive measures or additional burdens on interna tional trade in agricultural products constitutes a challenge that is hampering worldwide economic recovery efforts, especially in developing countries. In this regard, we would like to remind the EU of the request made in documents G/SPS/GEN/1778 and G/TBT/GEN/296 - Request for the suspension of the processes an d entry into force of reductions of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for plant protection products in light of the COVID -19 pandemic. 2.210. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. We continue to raise our concern about the European Union's (EU) transitional measures for pesticide maximum residue levels (MRLs). We repeat our request that the EU extend transition periods to allow adequate time for US and third -country producers to modify their integrated pest management programmes and to allow trading partners to move their products through the channels of trade, including shelf stable products with years -long shelf lives. We recall longstanding concerns that trading partners do not know with certainty what the impact of the EU's activ e substance non -renewal decisions will be on future MRLs. We would have serious trade concerns if the subsequent deletion of MRLs and import tolerances is disproportionate to the level of risk to human health. In addition, we reiterate our concern about th e EU's consideration of import tolerance applications. The review of additional data is often only considered after the EU notifies its intent to issue a non -renewal notice. Trading partners have found themselves racing to move shipments through customs fa st enough to prevent rejections or turning back orders because a product that complies with an existing EU MRL standard at the time of production will face rejection at EU borders. EU growers do not face these tight timelines under the current regulatory p rovisions. Once again, the United States reiterates its request that the EU retain existing MRL levels while import tolerances are under consideration, complete full risk assessments prior to setting new MRLs, and extend its MRL transitional measures to ac count for realistic production and processing times for food and agricultural products. We also again request 65 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 580 . G/TBT/M/85 - 57 - that imported products' MRLs be considered on the EU market at the time of production, the same as for European products. 2.211. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia reiterates its concern regarding the international consultation processes adopted by the European Union (EU) and the transition periods granted prior to the entry into force of provisions under which the EU no longer approves the marketing of certain plant protection substances and amends maximum residue limits (MRLs). These concerns are being reiterated because the EU has so far not responded to any of the requests concerning the granting of longer transiti on periods and has not taken into consideration the comments made during international consultation periods. The EU also failed to address the call made by a number of developing countries, including Colombia, for the temporary suspension, during the most crucial stages of the pandemic, of review processes for approvals for plant protection substances. These processes are ongoing, as is the definition of MRLs. Furthermore, we reiterate that there is no alternative that would help resolve the problems and un certainty arising from short transition periods. These create challenges for fruit - and vegetable -producing countries. This is particularly complex for products with long production and harvesting cycles as, while complying with European standards at the t ime of sowing, they may face regulatory changes that prevent exports at the time of the harvesting and distribution of the product. The same challenges, and those referred to by the United States delegation, arise for processed and frozen foods and those w ith long distribution chains. 2.212. Furthermore, Colombia maintains that notification to the WTO of non -renewal of regarding the MRLs to be applied should not be made by the EU as a simple formality. As provided for in Articles 2.9.2 and 2.9.4, the notification must be submitted within a time frame that allows the Members concerned to submit observations and comments for genuine consideration by whoever is developing the technical regulation. Within the framework of this Committee, it is not acceptable to Colombi a for the EU to state that, as soon as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendation is known, countries should be able to "make the relevant adjustments", given that this information must first be notified to the WTO and the public consultation period held. Nor is it acceptable for the EU to publish the final regulation in the days immediately after the end of the international consultation period, as this shows that the comments submitted have not been taken into account. We invite the EU to fo llow the recommendations for good regulatory practices, under which standards must be based on clear and objective information, and which promote open dialogue with stakeholders. Colombia once again welcomes the opportunity to express its concerns regardin g this issue and looks forward to a response from the EU. 2.213. The representative of Guatemala provided the following statement. We reiterate our interest in this issue, and our concern regarding how these decisions are affecting agricultural exporting countrie s such as Guatemala, by failing to ensure legal certainty for exports. Decisions that have an impact on agricultural exports should be adjusted according to the production process time of each product. It is also important to highlight that each product ha s a different cultivation and post-harvest period, which is why the six -month period, and the uncertainty that it will create for pesticide MRLs, will affect productive processes. A temporary suspension was requested, but the response of the European Union was negative, even though at that time there was the severe crisis caused by the outbreak of COVID -19, and yet the European Union continued with its processes. We would like to ask the European Union to consider our request. 2.214. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil supports the concerns raised under STC 580 and would like to refer to our previous statements on this agenda item. We respectfully bring to the attention of the EU its obligations under Article 2.12 of the TBT Agreem ent, which relate to the establishment of a reasonable interval between the publication of technical regulations and their entry into force, except in cases of urgent problems of safety, health, environmental protection or national security. It is of utmos t importance that the EU provides adequate transitional periods, especially for those cases in which the scientific opinions of the EFSA on the toxicity of substances are "inconclusive" or only indicate a "suspected risk". Transitional periods should also be compatible with the production processes, so as to allow producers – and especially small farmers – to adapt to the new regulations. 2.215. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. Paraguay reiterates its position and support for this c oncern and refers to its previous statements in requesting that the EU grant an appropriate adaptation period, reflecting the realities of the production processes and the geographical locations, including the distances, of the EU's trading partners, as th e six-month period G/TBT/M/85 - 58 - is insufficient for adapting productive systems. Paraguay also stresses the importance of adopting a scientific approach based on the risk and not just on the hazard arising from the intrinsic properties of a chemical. The European Union 's approach to limiting the use of substances is more trade - restrictive than it needs to be for it to attain its legitimate objectives under the TBT Agreement. Likewise, the reduction of MRLs, on the basis of the argument that it is impossible to determine whether the use of many substances is safe and the lack of conclusive scientific evidence, even in cases where Codex Alimentarius has identified certain substances as being safe, is not in line with Members' obligations under the SPS Agreement. We stress that the pursuance of such policies will cause significant trade damage to the economies of developing countries and jeopardize their ability to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, including those related to food security. Like other similar concern s, we urge the EU to reassess its approach; base its decisions on conclusive scientific evidence and real risks weightings, in accordance with relevant international principles and standards; ensure import tolerances; and, where necessary, provide adequate transitional periods. 2.216. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada would like to reiterate its concerns with the EU's approach to transition periods for maximum residue limits. In our view, the sudden deletion of MRLs and import t olerances seems disproportionate to the level of risk to human health and is more trade restrictive than necessary. The current transition periods make it very difficult for exporters to adapt to the new requirements given the distance travelled from the s ource. While Canada appreciates the EU's clarification during the recent WTO SPS Committee, it still does not acknowledge the reality of agricultural supply chains such as multi -year inventory and extensive shelf life, including in foreign countries. Canad a seeks confirmation that the EU will allow more reasonable transition periods for MRLs where the risks of dietary exposure are acceptable. Transition periods will allow trade to continue uninterrupted, while providing sufficient time for producers and exp orters to adapt to the new EU requirements. At a time when ensuring food security is paramount, Canada urges the EU to extend transition periods for MRLs to third countries, taking into account the need for exporters to adapt to new requirements, as it has done so for its domestic producers. 2.217. The representative of Ecuador provided the following statement. Ecuador is extremely concerned about the "transition periods" granted by the EU for implementing its measures relating to the non -renewal of the use of substances and the reduction of tolerances. In order to establish reasonable transition periods, it is necessary to consider harvesting periods and the times when agrochemicals are applied. Farmers in all countries, and particularly in developing countries, need more time to adapt to MRL requirements, as it takes 36 months on average to develop or register a new phytosanitary pest control product. Ecuador is aware that the EU allows its farmers to request emergency authorizations so that, in certain special situations, they can use active substances that have already been banned in the European market. For Ecuador, it is important to know whether, where emergency authorizations are issued for the use of such substances, EU member countries have notified and justified the application of MRLs that differ from those established in the EU's existing MRL regulations. We would also like to know how the EU monitors whether the member State that has received an emergency authorization for the use of prohibited substances is complying with the existing MRL regulations and how it verifies, in the case of no n-compliance with the MRL regulations, that the products containing the prohibited substances have not been marketed in other EU member States. 2.218. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement. In view of harvesting periods, the stages at wh ich plant protection products are applied, and the time required to develop and register alternative substances, in practice, the transitional periods granted by the European Union in the provisions amending MRLs for active substances do not provide enough time to make the necessary adjustments to production and ensure that agricultural products, especially processed or frozen products, comply with the new, lower MRLs. Like other Members, Uruguay does not consider six months to be a sufficient period in thi s regard. In our view, any changes should be gradual, and a reasonable period of time, of at least two years or two harvests, should be granted to raise awareness in the production sector and among technical advisers, and to ensure that effective substitut es for the active ingredients for whose MRLs a reduction is sought are available on the market. It is inappropriate to change the rules drastically in the middle of a harvest season, given the impact this may have on international and domestic marketing. M y delegation reiterates its call on Members to adopt regulatory decisions based on internationally accepted standards or to provide conclusive scientific evidence when it is strictly necessary to depart from these standards in order to meet their legitimat e objectives, as provided for in the relevant WTO Agreements. Even in cases where the European Union decides, based on a full risk assessment, that it is necessary to G/TBT/M/85 - 59 - reduce the MRLs for active substances used in the agricultural production of other Member s, we encourage it to take into consideration the need to grant transitional periods that are sufficiently long to make the relevant adjustments. 2.219. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile echoes the STC raised by Costa Rica, the U nited States, Colombia and Guatemala in relation to the tolerances being set by the EU for different plant protection substances, which affect Chile's agricultural production and foreign trade in these products. 2.220. In response, the representative of the Europ ean Union provided the following statement. The EU has provided detailed information on transitional periods for Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) at previous TBT Committees, in particular at the TBT Committee meeting in May 2020. The EU considers concerns on the setting of Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) for pesticides – and any details regarding their implementation – to be an issue for discussion at the SPS Committee, rather than at the TBT Committee. On the contrary, all measures concerning non -approval or re striction of active substances used in plant protection products in the EU are notified to the TBT Committee. These measures do not have direct consequences on SPS -related matters. However, in the interest of transparency and, further to requests by some M embers, when notifying these measures under the WTO/TBT notification system, the EU additionally informs the SPS Committee of the submission of those notifications. In practice, both Committees are informed about draft acts on the non -approval or restricti on of approval of an active substance. However, comments should only submitted via the TBT notification system. The European Union would like to point out in this context that the commenting deadlines are always respected and that the comments received wit hin those deadlines are duly taken into account in the EU's decision -making process. In the interest of efficient proceedings in both Committees and, in line with the respective Agreements, matters on approvals of active substances should be discussed excl usively in the TBT Committee, while matters on the setting of MRLs for pesticides should be discussed exclusively in the SPS Committee. As regards the joint Request for the suspension of the processes and entry into force of reduction of Maximum Residue Le vels (MRLs) of plant protection products in light of the COVID -19 pandemic in documents G/SPS/GEN/1778 and G/TBT/GEN/296 and subsequent revisions, the EU position is included in the document of 28 May 2021 with double reference G/SPS/GEN/1814/Rev.2 and G/TBT/GEN/315 , circulated in both Committees. 2.1.3.26 China - Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation a nd Regulation for Notification of Non -special Cosmetics, G/TBT/N/CHN/1310, G/TBT/N/CHN/1311, G/TBT/N/CHN/1331, G/TBT/N/CHN/1453, G/TBT/N/CHN/1454, G/TBT/N/CHN/1459, G/TBT/N/CHN/1460, G/TBT/N/CHN/1515, G/TBT/N/CHN/1524, G/TBT/N/CHN/1525, G/TBT/N/CHN/1526, G/TB T/N/CHN/1527, G/TBT/N/ CHN/1539, G/TBT/N/CHN/16 15, G/TBT/N/CHN/1626 (ID 57666) 2.221. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States reiterates our concerns with the Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation (CSAR) implementing measures. CSAR's final implementing measures, as pu blished, will pose significant risks to companies' intellectual property; are not proportionate to cosmetics' low risk compared to medical products; and the United States has serious concerns whether it accords unequal treatment to imports. Both the draft measures and those published as final appear to continue to require extensive disclosures of trade secrets and confidential business information (CBI) that may not be limited to what is necessary to assess conformity and fulfill CSAR's regulatory objective s. The United States and other WTO Members asked that China consider how CSAR could be made more similar with the approaches taken by regulators in other major cosmetics markets, in which cosmetics companies maintain responsibility for their products makin g documentation available to regulators as needed, upon request. This allows companies to safeguard their information. We urge NMPA to address these concerns. Regarding the current draft measures, we have the following concerns and questions. We ask that C hina clarify the approval procedures for new toothpaste ingredients in the draft Standards of Information File for Toothpaste (G/TBT/N/CHN/1539). Will companies be allowed to use the same procedures provided in CSAR for cosmetics ingredients? 2.222. We acknowledg e China notified an updated draft of the Good Manufacturing Practices for Cosmetics (GMP) to the WTO (G/TBT/N/CHN/1626) for comment in September, given the substantive updates. We ask China to confirm that for the purposes of overseas inspections, foreign 66 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 576 . G/TBT/M/85 - 60 - manufacturers will be considered in conformity with the Chinese GMP standard if, as provided in Article 17 of the Provisions for the Management of Cosmetics Registration and Notification Dossiers (a draft of which was notified as G/TBT/N/CHN/1524 ), they are in conformity with t heir national or international GMP standards. We also acknowledge China's July WTO notification (G/TBT/N/CHN/1615) of the draft Provisions for the Supervision and Administration of Children Cosmetics; we submitted comments on 20 September 2021 and look for ward to China's response in addition to the clarifications in provided to US industry input. In addition to the above concerns on the draft measures, despite extensive engagement from the United States, US industry, and other stakeholders, significant conc erns remain over CSAR's recently finalized implementing measures. We acknowledge China's statement at the June TBT meeting, clarifying that NMPA will only require a summary of the efficacy claim in the product abstracts published on NMPA's website. Can Chi na confirm that the filer/registrant will write the summary, and if the filer/registrant or NMPA will upload the summary to the public website? We are disappointed that the finalized Standards for Cosmetics Efficacy Claim Evaluation, which was notified in draft form as G/TBT/N/CH N/1526 , may require testing that appear to be more burdensome, if duplicative, than what is available from the use and testing of the product in other markets. 2.223. We urge China to recognize test reports from foreign labs that do not have Chinese Metrological Accreditation, if the labs follow Good Laboratory Practices or Good Clinical Practices, per the ICH Guidelines, and are in conformity with China's requirements. Will China consider alternative means of validating these claims, not included in the Claims Gu idelines, if the means are in conformity with China's requirements? We are hearing renewed concerns from US companies that NMPA has not instituted adequate procedures to prevent CBI and trade secret disclosures. For example, NMPA has not clarified what inf ormation from ingredient filings will be available publicly or to companies submitting product filings. We again ask if China intends to develop an explicit mechanism for companies to indicate to NMPA when information submitted to comply with CSAR, its regulations, measures, specifications and standards, should be marked as trade secrets or CBI. We ask that this mechanism provide a means by which protections from unauthorized disclosures can be monitored and legally enforced within China and abroad. We rema in disappointed that China has not taken into account the concerns raised by several members of the WTO TBT Committee that the Provisions for Management of New Cosmetic Ingredient Registration and Notification Dossiers (draft of which was notified as G/TBT/N/CHN/1525 ) may have the effect of requiring importers to animal test their products if they cannot provide a regulator -issued Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) certificate. The United States has explained that the US Food and Drug Administration does not issue these GMP cert ificates. We therefore again ask that China consider less burdensome means to establish conformity with GMP. For example, in the United States, trade associations and other third parties can issue certifications in line with the international GMP standard ISO 22716, which the US FDA and regulators in other major cosmetics markets reference. 2.224. To date, China's WTO TBT Committee delegation and NMPA have not responded to US Government or US industry enquiries for additional clarification on China's rationale for using animal testing to establish conformity with GMP or provided an update as to which WTO Member and US state certificates will be accepted across China's provinces. On China's Administrative Measures on Cosmetic Labelling (G/TBT/N/CHN/1515), while we a ppreciate China's 3 June communication to US industry, the concern remains that China's requirement for "consistency" in foreign and Chinese labelling is overly burdensome, as it could require China -unique packaging. We ask China to clarify that the foreig n language labelling for product safety and claims is not required to match the Chinese label exactly, so long as the Chinese and the foreign labelling do not conflict. We are also concerned that China did not notify for comment in China or to the WTO all of the transition periods for cosmetics already registered to comply with the new requirements in the CSAR implementing measures. China's failure to notify has prevented companies from submitting comments as to the feasibility of the timelines. For example , it may not be feasible for companies to update some special cosmetics safety assessments in less than a year, particularly if all required testing must be completed in China, with no allowances for cross referencing of testing from other markets. We ask that China notify these deadlines for public comment and, given the magnitude of the changes, allow manufacturers at least two to three years to update the registrations and sell through existing inventory for products already on the market. The United Sta tes appreciates China's most recent notifications of CSAR implementing measures and the opportunity to provide comment; however, we remain deeply concerned that several serious issues, such as protections for rights holders and the potential for disparate treatment between importers and domestic manufacturers, which have been raised by several WTO Members, remain unaddressed. G/TBT/M/85 - 61 - 2.225. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. The Republic of Korea thanks China for providing a resp onse to Korea's comments concerning the specifications and regulations under this STC. However, the reply from China did not give direct answers to Korea's enquiry but only gave a general explanation on the implementation of the measures. As Korea's concer ns were not duly addressed in the finalized specifications and regulations, Korea unfortunately would like to raise this STC once again. First, the exporters to China are required to specify the sources and quality data of all ingredients in their applicat ions, which is demanding more information than what is required in other countries. Such information may contain trade secrets that are critical to businesses, and this requirement is more rigorous than necessary to fulfill the objectives of ensuring produ ct safety and complying with China's domestic market norms. Korea therefore would like to request China to provide an evidence -based explanation for this requirement. Furthermore, according to Appendix 12 -14, businesses are required to disclose information on ingredient safety, which leads to a concern that businesses' commercially sensitive information and intellectual property may not be protected. Second, the regulations stipulate that test results required for cosmetic product registration must be issue d by testing laboratories that have obtained the China Metrology Accreditation (CMA). At present, however, only the laboratories in China are known to have obtained the CMA. Korea thus requests China to offer flexibility to foreign laboratories in granting the CMA and to recognize test results issued by foreign laboratories or internationally recognized laboratories that comply with international standards such as Good Clinical Practice or Good Laboratory Practice. 2.226. Third, pursuant to Article 13 of the New C osmetic Ingredients Authorization and Registration Regulation, in case of using alternative test methods, exporting companies are required to provide equivalence evidence which proves that their test results are equivalent to the results of in vivo toxicit y testing method, or animal testing. Korea would like to request that OECD -approved and internationally recognized alternative test methods also be recognized without having to provide equivalence evidence. Fourth, regarding "the Administrative Measures on Cosmetic Labelling," Korea requests China to ensure that labelling requirements comply with internationally recognized practices so as not to be more trade restrictive than necessary. Specifically, with respect to the requirement of ingredient declaration in cosmetic labelling, Korea requests China to maintain its current regulation. In most countries, cosmetic ingredients are subject to declaration when the substances are at a 1% or higher concentration. According to China's proposed regulation, however, declaration of ingredients is required for the substances at a 0.1% or higher concentration, and the substances at a concentration lower than 0.1% are to be declared as "other ingredients in small amounts". This requirement goes against harmonized internat ional standards. Fifth, under the regulations for Cosmetic Efficacy Claim Evaluation, China requires disclosing summarized scientific evidence that supports cosmetic efficacy claims on NMPA -designated websites. However, the information subject to disclosur e may contain a number of trade secrets or undisclosed business information that are critical to the Korean industry. Korea therefore requests China to remove the provisions requiring the disclosure of such information. Considering the aforementioned conce rns, Korea requests China to take into account Article 2.2 of the TBT Agreement, according to which Members shall ensure that technical regulations are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade. 2.227. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. With respect to "Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation" and its implementing regulations, Japan continues to express the following concerns. 1. "Management Rul es for Testing required for Cosmetic Product Registration and Notification", which was promulgated on 12 September 2019, stipulates that microbiological, physical, chemical, toxicological, and human safety and efficacy evaluation tests relevant to cosmetic s registration and filing shall be conducted by the testing laboratories in China that obtained China Inspection Body and Laboratory Mandatory Approval (CMA). Japan appreciates China taking Japan's repeated request to a certain level of consideration regar ding "Specifications for Registration and Filing of New Cosmetic Ingredients", which was promulgated on 4 March 2021, and stipulates that physical, chemical and microbiological testing reports relevant to new cosmetic ingredients registration and filing ma y be issued by the registrants or filers themselves or by entrusting a testing institution with corresponding testing capabilities. Japan would like to request, relevant to cosmetics registration and filing, a more flexible framework in which test results obtained by foreign laboratories with the equivalent qualifications and abilities as those of Chinese testing laboratories are accepted. In addition, regarding test methods, the implementing regulations of the "Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regu lation" stipulate that test methods including test items other than those stated above, can be conducted in accordance with China's national standard or relevant regulations, and that various restrictions and conditions are imposed in the case of G/TBT/M/85 - 62 - conductin g a test method which is not specified in the regulations. Japan would like to request that China accept internationally accepted methods such as alternative test methods established by the OECD, or the ISO. 2.228. 2. The sales certification that proves the produ cts have been sold on the market in the country of production is only imposed on imported cosmetics. Japan requests that China treat imported products no less favourably than products produced in China. In addition, regarding "Administrative Measures on Co smetic Labelling", which was promulgated on 3 June 2021, Japan would like to express its following four concerns. 3. Article 5 stipulates that the content of the added Chinese labels, such as information regarding product safety and efficacy, shall be cons istent with the original labels. However, the original labels are designed to comply with regulations in the country of production and it is natural that their contents do not always comply with China's regulations. Therefore, Japan would like to request t hat China assure that such requirement does not apply to labelling contents required by regulations in the country of production, and that the requirement will not be more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil legitimate objectives. 4. Regarding Artic le 6, Japan has concerns that multiple company names and addresses on the label may cause misunderstandings on the part of the consumer rather than achieving the aims of this article to inform consumers of the persons responsible for product quality and ef ficacy. In order to avoid confusion among consumers, Japan would like to ask China that the label indicates a single responsible person ("cosmetics registrants or filers" or in the case of imported products, "responsible person in China"), and Japan consid ers that the label requirements regarding producers are not necessary. 2.229. 5. With respect to the rules for labelling of all ingredients in cosmetics, there is an internationally recognized listing practice that ingredients with a compounding amount of 1% or l ess are allowed to be listed in no particular order. However, Article 12 stipulates that only ingredients with a compounding amount of 0.1% or less are allowed to be listed in no particular order. It also stipulates that ingredients with a compounding amou nt between more than 0.1% and 1% are to be listed in descending order. Japan would like to request that China assure that the rules for labelling follow the internationally recognized practice so as not to be more trade restrictive than necessary. Moreover , the "Provisions for Cosmetics Registration" stipulates that overseas inspections are to be conducted in accordance with relevant regulations of overseas inspections. Regarding "Interim Measures on the Administration of Overseas Inspections of Cosmetics", Japan would like to continue to express concerns on the following three points. 6. Japan would like to request that China clarify which laws and regulations are used to determine conformity and specific purposes for conducting overseas inspections. Japan also asks that China ensure that inspections will not be more trade restrictive than necessary, ensuring that the legitimate objectives under the TBT Agreement are fulfilled. 7. The subject of the inspection including the product research and development s tage is broader than necessary, and it causes unnecessary burdens for companies. The main purpose of the inspection seems to ensure product safety but information related to research and development is not necessarily essential for product safety assurance . It is the most confidential of corporate information. Therefore, R&D departments of companies should be excluded from the subject of overseas inspections. Furthermore, inspections for domestic Chinese companies are only conducted on production sites. Jap an would like to request that China stipulates equal treatment for both domestic and overseas companies. 2.230. 8. Japan requests that China ensures that confidential information will not be disclosed to persons other than those who are necessary for the legitima te purpose of the inspection, since production sites also contain a large amount of confidential corporate information. Furthermore, Japan has the following concerns on other implementing regulations. 9. In "Specifications for Registration and Filing of Ne w Cosmetic Ingredients", there are specific requirements for nano ingredients and Annex 5 stipulates the definition of such ingredients. Article 29 of "Specifications for Cosmetics Registration and Filing" stipulates the rule for naming of nano ingredients in product formulas for registration or filing and also article 27 of "Standards of Information File for Toothpaste Notification (Draft for Comments)" stipulates the rule for naming of nano ingredients in the product formulation table. Japan considers tha t a more detailed and concrete standard is necessary to judge which ingredients fall under the definition of nano ingredients. In addition, Japan would like to request that the standard will be formulated in a way that reflects international trends and com ments from all stakeholders. 10. Regarding article 33 (II) (Exemption from submitting toxicological testing documents) of "Specifications for Cosmetics Registration and Filing", since the legal system and enforcement system for cosmetics differ by country or region, some countries may not have the relevant authority. Therefore, Japan would like China to accept a certification document on the G/TBT/M/85 - 63 - quality management system or good manufacturing practice qualification which is issued by an authorized international organization or an industry association which is authorized to issue the certifications by government agencies of the country or region where the registering or filing company is located, instead of a national institution . 2.231. 11. Regarding the test of freckle -removing/whitening products, Japan would like to request that China adopt the approach of Read -Across that was stipulated in Article 16 (freckle - removing/whitening effect cross -reference) of "Specifications for Cosmetic Effica cy Claim Evaluation (Draft for Comments)" last September. Freckle -removing/whitening is effected by active ingredients included in the cosmetics and the Read -Across approach will help shorten the process from application to permission. 12. Japan would like to request clarification so that filers of toothpaste products can use new toothpaste ingredients only when registrants/filers of new ingredients have confirmed their use in advance during the three -year safety monitoring period after their registration/f iling of new ingredients, in the same manner as article 29 of "Specifications for Cosmetics Registration and Filing", which stipulates the handling of new cosmetic ingredients. 13. Article 32 of "Standards of Information File for Toothpaste Notification (D raft for Comments)" stipulates that the abstract of an efficacy evaluation report shall be submitted during the filing process. The "Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation" stipulates that "cosmetics registrants or filers" are the persons resp onsible for efficacy of cosmetic products, however, its implementing regulations do not require submission of the abstract of an efficacy evaluation report. Japan would like to know the reason for the requirement of submitting the abstract of an efficacy evaluation for toothpaste. 14. Article 36 of "Specifications for Cosmetics Registration and Filing" newly requires that their registrants or filers retain samples of each batch of cosmetics produced for future inspection. It also stipulates that the number of retained samples shall be able to meet the requirements for conducting registration and filing tests. Retaining such samples from all lots requires prohibitive amounts of space and imposes substantial burdens. Japan would like to request that China stip ulate detailed rules allowing for flexible operation, such as setting the storage period up to each sample's expiration date since overdue samples from their expiration dat a are not suitable for use as samples. 2.232. 15. "Administrative Measures on Cosmetic Labe lling" stipulates that products that will be applied for registration or filing since 1 May 2022 must be adapted to the regulations. It also stipulates that products that have been applied for registration or filing before 1 May 2022, must be adapted to th e regulations by 1 May 2023. Registrants or filers need detailed rules and guidelines to adapt to the new cosmetic labelling system. Japan would like to request that China provide an adequate grace period of at least one year after promulgation of all rele vant regulations. 16. Article 29 of "Specifications for Cosmetics Registration and Filing" requires "Cosmetic Ingredients Safety Information" issued by a cosmetic ingredient manufacturer and registrants or filers must combine information of the raw materia ls used in cosmetics with "Cosmetic Ingredients Safety Information". Therefore, when registrants or filers change a cosmetic ingredient manufacturer, it is necessary to submit the document again even if the comparability of quality and safety are confirmed by registrants or filers. This causes unnecessary burdens for registrants or filers. Therefore, the same as in international practice, Japan considers that the information of ingredients should be submitted when requested by the NMPA after launch, but not at the time of registration or filing. "Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation" and "Provisions for Cosmetics Registration" require relevant information on registration and notification management of cosmetics and new cosmetic ingredients is announced to the public. Japan would like to request that China not announce "Cosmetic Ingredients Safety Information" of the raw materials used in cosmetics to the public because purchasing information of cosmetic ingredients is confidential corporate inf ormation. Implementing schedule of "Cosmetic Ingredients Safety Information" was provided in the related notice. It stipulates submitting the cosmetic ingredients safety information for preservatives, sunscreens, colorants, hair dyes and the skin whitening active ingredients contained in products applied for registration and filing since 1 January 2022, and cosmetic ingredients safety information is submitted through the online system. However, the system is not open and release date is undecided to date . In regards to submitting cosmetic ingredients safety information, Japan would like to request that China provide an adequate grace period. 2.233. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia respects the right of Members to implement technical measures for legitimate policy purposes and in accordance with obligations under the TBT Agreement. As we have said in previous TBT Committee statements, Australia is concerned that measures under China's Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Regulation (CSAR) and its various implementing regulations, which entered into force on 1 May G/TBT/M/85 - 64 - 2021, are more stringent than necessary to ensure the safety and quality of imported cosmetics. Australia notes that China has submitted a new notification (G/TB T/N/CHN/1626) on Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for cosmetics which relates to China's GMP requirement under the CSAR. Australia is reviewing this notification and will provide China with written comments in due course. Australia firstly would like more information from China on its reasons for requiring GMP certification, particularly as an alternative for animal testing to ensure safety. Our key interests are in ensuring that Australian cosmetics exporters have clarity and certainty on the requirements that they need to comply with and that those requirements do not unnecessarily impact on trade. We would also request the reason why China has maintained its requirement for mandatory animal testing of cosmetics products to be used on children (as notifie d on 23 July 2021 in G/TBT/N/CHN/1615 ), regardless of the level of risk presented by individual products? Australia is a consistent supplier of high quality and safe cosmetics products domestically, and to the world. As we have said before, the Australian Government stands read y to work with China and discuss the CSAR, including subordinate regulations such as those for GMP and for children's cosmetics. We would welcome the opportunity to exchange information and promote a better understanding of our respective regulatory system s for cosmetics. 2.234. The representative of New Zealand provided the following statement. New Zealand welcomes China's endeavours to modernize its regulatory system for cosmetics and appreciates the opportunity to comment on specific elements of China's Regulat ions. While we welcome the intention to improve safety and quality assurance, New Zealand would like to encourage China to ensure that facilitation of trade is considered in the implementation of the regulations. New Zealand notes that under the measures, non-animal tested cosmetics are able to enter China's market only if a regulator -issued GMP certification is provided. Yet non -special use cosmetics are considered to be low-risk products in many countries, including New Zealand, and for this reason are no t subject to regulator -issued GMP certification. We warmly welcome the introduction of alternatives to mandatory animal testing for imported cosmetics. Yet New Zealand, like others, is disappointed that the measures do not provide for non -regulator issued GMP certification or other trade facilitative mechanisms for providing product assurances, meaning that significant and unnecessary barriers to trade for imported cosmetics products still apply for Members who cannot offer regulator -issued GMP certificatio n. In this regard, we encourage China to engage directly with affected Members, including New Zealand, to identify a trade -facilitative mechanism to demonstrate GMP conformity, without imposing animal -testing requirements. Specifically, and following China 's response to New Zealand's question submitted during its recent WTO Trade Policy Review, New Zealand seeks clarification whether the requirement for a regulator -issued GMP certificate as an alternative to animal testing requirements can be exempted on th e basis that: the product fully complies with the relevant ISO22716 standard or higher, confirming the safety of the product; or a product safety risk assessment result is provided from a laboratory accredited by a National Accreditation Body that confirms the safety of the product. 2.235. Additionally, New Zealand requests that China also provide flexibility in respect of product testing requirements. In particular, we encourage China to accept test reports from accredited laboratories situated outside of China. Otherwise, this is a burdensome and unnecessary trade barrier for exporters which send products to China as well as multiple other markets. Building in such flexibility would be trade facilitative and in accordance with international best practice. New Zealand also holds concerns, that we note are shared by many Members, that China requires more detailed disclosure of product formulas than is required in other markets, including specific sources of each ingredient. New Zealand encourages China to limit such disclosure requirements, particularly in relation to sensitive information, to that which is required to assure product safety in China's domestic market, so as not to compromise intellectual property. New Zealand appreciates our recent constructive bilat eral engagement on cosmetics issues and looks forward to engaging further with China on its CSAR measures to address these issues. We would welcome China's response to the concerns raised by New Zealand and other Members in this and other fora. 2.236. The represe ntative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to refer to its earlier statements on this topic, in particular to the statement delivered in the June TBT Committee, as the EU's concerns outlined therein remain unchanged. The main aim of the CSAR is to ensure consumer safety. The European Union supports this objective, however there is an important concern pertaining to the obligation to transmit confidential information on new products and their ingredients to the Chinese authorities. The mandatory disclosure of commercially sensitive information required in the notification and registration process, touching on intellectual property rights (IPR) of companies involved, remains EU's biggest concern. The EU believes that G/TBT/M/85 - 65 - CSAR 's requirements go beyond what is necessary to ensure consumer safety and traceability of the ingredients used in cosmetics. It is also diverging from international practice, as such extensive level of information is not required elsewhere in the world for notification and registration purposes. Other important concerns of the EU are the following: - Registration of products: Companies must submit a complete list of raw materials used in the finished product. Supplier of raw materials must submit detailed i nformation on the raw material, including the production process. - Notification for new ingredients: There are concerns over the amount of information required under the new notification system and potential issues over the disclosure of such information after a certain period. - Efficacy claims: manufacturers are required to make public a detailed summary of efficacy evaluation, which can reveal business -sensitive information. Finally, the EU would like to reiterate its comment that a differentiated appro ach is needed between new products and products already placed on the market. This would avoid a situation when product supply could be interrupted for an extended period of time due to insufficient preparation time for both industry and supervision author ities. 2.237. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. In a bilateral meeting prior to the last meeting of the TBT Committee, the Chinese delegation shared with Brazil valuable information about the regulatory framework applicable to cosmeti cs. At that time, the Chinese side stated that it would be willing to receive suggestions for testing methodologies alternative to animal testing in order to further improve its regulatory requirements. In light of this understanding Brazil has been trying to convey a list of OECD tests applicable to cosmetics that can contribute to the objective of reducing or eliminating the use of tests on animals. These OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals are methodologies widely used in other countries with th e highest health standards. We kindly ask China to consider accepting these OECD -approved testing methodologies without having to provide any sort of equivalence evidence or without having to present any unnecessary government -issued Good Manufacturing Pra ctice (GMP) certificate. 2.238. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. 1. Safety -related information requirement is a common practice across the world for the safety review of health - related products. Information such as the br ief description of the production process, production process of raw material required is not subject to government information disclosure. According to the Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information, authorities are prohibited from disclosing information involving trade secrets and personal privacy that may harm the legitimate rights and interests of third parties. Therefore, trade secrets and intellectual property rights will not be damaged in this regard. China attaches great importance to t he protection of trade secrets of enterprises. According to articles 47, 56 of the Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Cosmetics, as well as the Measures for the Administration of Registration and Filing of Cosmetics issued on 7 January 20 21, trade secrets of the parties shall be kept confidential. 2. As for the efficacy assessment information, it is for the very purpose of protecting intellectual property that only a summary, not the full text of its supporting evidence is required. The te chnical materials required of new raw materials which are subject to disclosure only include some basic aspects, not the complete information. The authorities will also strictly protect business secrets in managing cosmetics registration and filing. 2.239. 3. Str engthening the supervision of cosmetics production is a necessary means of ensuring product quality and safety, which is a common practice worldwide. Based on the non -discrimination principle of WTO, the Provisions on the Administration of Cosmetics Regist ration and Filing Data put forward exactly the same requirements on imported and domestic cosmetics for an alternative programme of animal test for safety evaluation. For the required quality management system certification issued by the government agency of place of production, while it is non -discriminatory to domestic and imported products, it is also for the purpose of ensuring the quality and safety of the products. 4. Product safety is closely related to raw material safety. It is an important measure to require clarification of the information related to raw material safety when handling registration and filing applications, so as to ensure product safety. For cases of changes of raw material suppliers, the Regulation provides for different situations . For example, if there are no substantive changes in the proportion of the raw material in the formulation, nor changes in the composition of the raw material itself, the Regulation only requires updates on changes of suppliers. If changes occur to certai n additives to a raw material, without changes in the proportion and function of the raw material in the formulation, only the information related to changes is required. 5. Requirement for inspection reports issued by accredited inspection institutions is in line with the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the consumers. Inspection institutions could be foreign funded ones. At present, many laboratories of foreign inspection institutions in China have obtained the CMA certification of cos metics. 6. The draft Administrative Measures for Cosmetic Labelling does not G/TBT/M/85 - 66 - require that all contents of the Chinese label and original label should correspond to each other, but only requires that the contents of product safety and efficacy claims indica ted in the Chinese sticker should correspond to those of original label. 2.240. 7. Labelling of information of manufacturers is an important measure to protect consumers' right to know, and to promote social co -governance and to combat counterfeiting. The Adminis trative Measures for Cosmetic Labelling does not require labelling of information on country of origin. Such labelling is not expected to contradict labelling of information of manufacturers. For cases where manufacturers change production facilities, no i nformation change will be involved as long as production quality requirements are met by manufacturers. 8. The efficacy of products is closely related to that of their ingredients. In general, there is a positive quantity -effect relationship between the ef ficacy of the ingredients and the amount added in the formulation. Therefore, in order to prevent the "conceptual addition" of cosmetic ingredients, the proposed draft measures, based on the scientific supervision concept, propose that ingredients with for mula content not exceeding 0.1% (w/w) should be labelled with "other trace ingredients" as guiding words. 9. On 29 June 2020, China has issued a new revision of the regulations on the supervision and administration of cosmetics. It came into effect on 1 Ja nuary 2021. For other regulations on cosmetics, reasonable transition periods have been or will be set as well. 2.1.3.27 European Union - Chlorothalonil (pesticide active substance), G/TBT/N/EU/625 (ID 57967) 2.241. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement. Costa Rica once again fully supports the comments made by Colombia and reiterates its concern regarding the measure notified by the European Union in document G/TBT/N/EU/625 , relating to the non -renewal of the approval of the active substance chloro thalonil. Costa Rica's concern has been raised during previous meetings of this Committee and is based on the lack of conclusive scientific evidence and the application of a precautionary approach in the processes to renew the marketing approvals, which then affect the establishment of MRLs. This has happened in the case of chlorothalonil, with the Regulation relating to this substance entering into effect in May 2020 despite the many concerns raised in various WTO bodies at both the bilateral and regional level, and at an extremely difficult time for tropical agricultural exporting countries such as Costa Rica, which continue to feel the adverse effects of the pandemic. In this respect, we support the call made by Costa Rica, Colombia and 37 other WTO Membe rs in document G/TBT/GEN/296/Rev.3 for the EU to temporarily suspend all review processes of market approvals for plant protection substances, as well as the entry into force of regulations in this area planned for 2020 and 2021, including the non -renewal of the active substance chlorothalonil. 2.242. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia reiterates its concern regarding the measure notified by the European Union (EU) in document G/TBT/N/EU/625 relating to non -renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorothalonil. I take this opportunity to indicate that my delegation is interested and that it will follow up on the concerns previously raised on Phosmet and Alpha -cypermethrin because it involves a very similar approach to the one found in relation to this concern. De spite the many technical and scientific comments submitted within the consultation periods, the regulation under which the marketing approval of the active substance chlorothalonil is not renewed entered into force in May 2020. This decision is already beginning to have major implications and consequences for banana producers in Colombia and has repercussions for an extensive domestic agricultural production chain. In addition, the Commission decided to set the MRL at the minimum level of detection, thereby creating fresh challenges for agricultural producers. In this case, the EU has failed to take into consideration the technical comments submitted and the requests for a longer transition period to adapt production processes. Nor has the EU given considera tion to the concerns raised by various Members in this Organization, and there has been no response to the calls for dialogue made on a number of occasions. A number of these calls were already made by my colleague from Costa Rica so I will not refer to th em again. 2.243. The EU has taken measures under which approval for the use or marketing of plant protection products is not renewed, and MRLs are subsequently reduced. Not only were these measures taken in the absence of sound scientific evidence and in a manner that was inconsistent with international standards, they are also being applied in a discriminatory fashion, as, in practice, their implementation strongly differentiates between EU domestic producers and foreign producers. 67 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 579 . G/TBT/M/85 - 67 - While we recognize the health a nd environmental protection objectives involved, these measures are being adopted without any proof that they are indeed the least trade -restrictive means of ensuring an appropriate level of protection. In Colombia, the use of plant protection substances - such as chlorothalonil - is essential in agricultural production. This substance is particularly important for banana production in controlling Black Sigatoka, a fungus that can devastate this crop. It is important to reiterate that the measures establish ed by the EU should be based on scientific evidence and international standards and that they should take into account the diverse agriculture of tropical countries such as Colombia. 2.244. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil sup ports STC 579 and refers to its previous statements on the matter. We respectfully differ from the EU's decision to base measures on a hazard -based approach, without an adequate risk analysis and with no compliance with long -standing scientific principles. The non -renewal of approval for chlorothalonil by the EU did not duly consider that it is currently authorized in more than 100 countries, and that the MRLs allowed by Codex could reach up to 70 mg/kg. We stress our systemic concern with the fact that some hazard -based analyses conducted by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) led to the non - renewal of approvals of some substances and subsequently to the reduction of their MRLs. The Brazilian National Health Agency has set MRLs for chlorothalonil applied to more than 30 crops. The case of chlorothalonil is particularly harmful towards Brazil's producers of banana, coffee, citrus fruits, papaya, watermelon, among others. 2.245. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. This concern and the non- renewal of the approval of chlorothalonil and other substances was already discussed extensively both in this Committee and in the SPS Committee because of the subsequent reduction of MRLs. Paraguay therefore refers to its previous statements and reite rates its cross -cutting concern with regard to the EU's decision not to renew the approval of these substances without a proper risk analysis and without complying with scientific principles. In the specific case of chlorothalonil, this low-risk substance is sold freely in Paraguay and is used in several export products as part of the rotation of substances to avoid pest resistance. It is also the most common alternative for mancozeb, another substance whose approval was not renewed by the EU despite the fa ct that neither of these substances poses a risk to human health or the environment, if used in accordance with good agricultural practice. While we share the objectives that the EU seeks to address with these policies, we do not share its adopted approach for attaining them because it is not based on conclusive scientific evidence. We urge the EU to consider less trade restrictive alternatives and base its measures on conclusive scientific evidence. 2.246. The representative of Ecuador provided the following stat ement. Ecuador wishes to reiterate its concern in relation to notification G/TBT/N/EU/625 on the non -renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorothalonil and document SANTE/10186/2018 Rev 1, through which the EU confirms the non -renewal of the approval of the substance. Chlorothalonil is one of the main tools for controlling Black Sigatoka in bananas due to its effectiveness, low cost and multisite mode of action, meaning that the risk of resistance is low. It is available in a wide range of products, through many suppliers, and is widely available in the country. Controlling Black Sigatoka ( Mycosphaerella fijiensis ) is the main challenge for banana production in Latin America. To control the disease, strategies of rotating fungicides with different modes of act ion have been pursued to avoid fungal resistance to these compounds. A limited variety of molecules is available for rotation in spraying schedules. Restricting the use of chlorothalonil will further complicate efforts to prevent pest resistance. Reducing the MRL for chlorothalonil could have a very significant economic impact on small -, medium -, and large -scale producers in Ecuador, as well as on consumers in the EU, since the supply of our products would be affected. Moreover, no substitute or similar phy tosanitary products with the same environmental or toxicological profile are currently available, since the alternatives to chlorothalonil (mancozeb, metiram) are already under review, and some prohibited, by the EU. The banana sector provides jobs for 2.5 million people. Banana exports generate 2.1 billion in revenue for the country, accounting for 2% of GDP and 35% of agricultural GDP. Furthermore, Ecuador would like to ask the EU if, where emergency authorizations have been issued for the use of this sub stance, EU member countries have notified and justified the application of MRLs that differ from those established in the EU's existing MRL regulations. If so, which MRL is being applied by member countries and how is compliance with that MRL being monitor ed in intra-European trade? 2.247. The representative of Guatemala provided the following statement. Guatemala reiterates the concern that has been discussed at previous meetings, namely the negative impact of non -renewal G/TBT/M/85 - 68 - on agricultural exports and their minimal impact in terms of MRLs, in particular when the alternative substances have not been renewed and there is no effective like substance on the market for agricultural production, particularly the banana sector, in view of tropical climate conditions. 2.248. In res ponse, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. As explained at previous meetings, the EU proposed not to renew the approval of chlorothalonil through Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2019/67768, adopted on 29 April 2019 an d previously notified to the TBT Committee. Chlorothalonil was evaluated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 on the placing of plant protection products on the market.69 The conclusion70 by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on this subs tance was published in January 2018. During the peer review process, the approval criteria in Article 4 of the Regulation were not satisfied with respect to one or more representative uses of at least one plant protection product. Following the non -renewal of approval decision, the EU prepared a draft Regulation lowering the Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for chlorothalonil, which was notified to the WTO/SPS Committee (G/SPS/N/EU/394). In view of the concerns identified by EFSA, the EU lowered all MRLs for c hlorothalonil to the relevant limits of quantification through Regulation (EU) 2021/155 of 9 February 2021.71 The new values are applicable to all food products since 2 September 2021 (after expiration of a 6 -month deferral of the application date that had been granted). As from that date, also food products produced beforehand must comply with the new MRLs. Import tolerance requests, which need to be supported by substantial new data addressing the concerns, remain possible and will be assessed on a case -by- case basis by the "rapporteur" member State and the EFSA. Unless new data would be submitted which would address the concerns raised by EFSA, there will be no further developments in the EU on that substance. As regards the joint Request for the suspensi on of the processes and entry into force of reduction of Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) of plant protection products in light of the COVID -19 pandemic in documents G/SPS/GEN/1778 and G/TBT/GEN/296 and subsequent revisions, the EU position is included in the document of 28 May 2021 with double reference G/SPS/GEN/1814/Rev.2 and G/TBT/GEN/315 circulated in both Committees. 2.1.3.28 Republic of Korea - Amendments to the Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources, G/TBT/N/KOR/843, G/TBT/N/KOR/844, G/TBT/N/KOR/857, G/TBT/N/KOR/918, G/TBT/N/KOR/919, G/TBT/N/KOR/937 (ID 58872) 2.249. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU strongly supports actions taken to protect the environment and acknowledges the efforts made by t he Republic of Korea to facilitate the recycling procedure by encouraging producers to place recycle - friendly products on the market. As regards the TBT notifications G/TBT/N/KOR/918 , G/TBT/N/KOR/919 and G/TBT/N/KOR/937 , could Korea pleas e provide an update about any new revised legislation in relation to QR code applications, etc., and confirm the implementation date of these measures? Regarding the TBT notification G/TBT/N/KOR/956 , which relates to the labelling and the design of a separate discharge mark, the EU would like to request an extension to the implementation date of 1 January 2022 for new products. As there was a delay in the publication of the design of the label, this means that there are only five months to implement these changes, which is not suffi cient time to do so. Changes to labelling of new products usually takes 12 -18 months. 2.250. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia recognizes the Republic of Korea's right to implement regulations that promote the reduction o f waste and the production of easily recyclable packaging materials. Australia thanks Korea for providing an exclusion from displaying recyclability evaluation results on wine bottles ("labelling exemption"). Australia also thanks Korea for clarifying why wine bottles are not exempt from the environmental fee. Recognizing these changes will impact our wine industry, Australia seeks further information on the timeframe for when these measures will come into force and whether any arrangements will be made to assist in transitioning to these new requirements. 68 OJ L 114, 30.4.2019, p. 15. 69 http://eur -lex.europa.eu/legal -content/EN/TXT/?qid=1489747880535&uri=CELEX:32009R1107 . 70 EFSA 2018 Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorothalonil. EFSA Journal 2018;16(1):5126. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/5126 71 OJ L 46, 10.2.2021, p. 5. 72 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 588 . G/TBT/M/85 - 69 - 2.251. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States supports this STC. 2.252. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile associates itself with the statements by the EU and Australia. As indicated at previous meetings of this Committee, Chile recognizes the Republic of Korea's right to implement regulations that promote waste reduction and the production of easily recyclable packaging materials, and requests that consideration be given to the implementation periods that are required for this type of regulation. 2.253. In response, the representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. To the EU : The Guidelines on Separate Discharge Lab elling (Ministry of Environment Notification No. 2021-140) announced on 7 July 2021 reflects that the period required for replacing copper plate or mold of a packaging is usually 6 to 12 months. The revised regulations will be applied on new products from 2022, and on the existing products from 2024. The effective date of the amended regulations is based on the date of manufacture for both domestic and imported products. However, in the case of new products, considering the fact that less than six months is given from the date of final announcement of the amendment to the effective date, it is to be reviewed to grant an additional grace period for each product and packaging material after checking the period necessary for the application of the new label, su ch as exhaustion of stock. To Australia : The surcharge of recycling contribution, which is often indicated as environmental fee, on glass bottles used for packaging wine and whisky is applied on the products manufactured or imported on or after 1 January 2 021, and their producers or importers are to be noticed to pay the surcharge of this year around September next year. For specific details regarding the payment of recycling contribution, we recommend the individual producers or importers contact Korea Pac kaging Recycling Cooperative (KPRC), which is an institution established by producers and importers to jointly fulfill their recycling obligations in accordance with the Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources. 2.1.3.29 China - Draft Administrativ e Measures for Registration of Overseas Producers of Imported Foods, G/TBT/N/CHN/1522 (ID 61173) 2.254. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States notes that China has published the final version of this measure as Decree 248 on 12 April 2021, with an implementation date of 1 January 2022. We remain concerned with such a trade -impacting regulation, which does not appear to have clear food safety and public health benefits. The measure appears to apply to all food products, regardless of ri sk or whether foods are already subject to other import certification requirements. We anticipate that the measure, when implemented, will likely create major trade disruptions for the United States and every other country that exports food and agricultura l products to China. Any measure of this magnitude requires far more time for industry to implement. Therefore, we ask China to immediately suspend or delay implementation of these measures until 1 July 2023, when sufficient guidance has been provided and exporting countries' questions have been answered and exporting companies will have been given sufficient time to register with their competent authorities. 2.255. The representative of The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu provided t he following statement. The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu has been closely following the development of the measure ever since China notified its draft (G/TBT/N/CHN/1522 on 16 November 2020). Given that the measure will aff ect a wide range of our food-related industries and that the measure involves a high extent of uncertainties as mentioned below, we have expressed our concerns several times before. We have also sent detailed comments to seek confirmation and clarification . However, we have yet to receive a sufficient and detailed response from China. China published the measure in April. However, even up to the present stage when China has started its registration requirements, many uncertainties about the interpretation and implementation of the measure still remain, including the scope of products and facilities that are subject to this measure, registration requirements and guidelines on how to fill out application documents (especially for food producers that need to fi le the application by themselves), procedures and timelines for audits, re -evaluation and renewal of registration. An even more essential question is how the categories of risks of products are established in this measure, not to mention our concerns about its inconsistency with the TBT Agreement. According to the measure, a food producer is required to obtain registration with the GACC and to mark the registration number on both the inner and outer package of its product. However, while the GACC has the ri ght to review registration 73 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 611 . G/TBT/M/85 - 70 - application, and the timeline of its review is unspecified, our businesses are worried about whether they can obtain the approval in time and if there is sufficient time for them to follow the labelling requirement. Besides, Chin a did not provide enough explanation regarding the justification of the measures, nor did they offer sufficient transitional period and detailed guidance on implementation. These elements will increase risk of trade disruption; we, therefore, urge China to offer sufficient transitional period. And, in order to get the needed clear understanding of the measure and to facilitate registration application, we also urge China to give sufficient information and a comprehensive briefing in the Committee or provide us with a more detailed responses to our comments. 2.256. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU must express its concern about the implementation of Decree 248 of the Chinese Customs Administration. The EU does not in the least question the right of China to ensure that imported food products come from legitimate sources. We share and support this objective. However, the EU is gravely concerned about the manner in which China is implementing the planned registration of exporting businesses. China and the EU trade high volumes of food products and beverages through tens of thousands of enterprises, some big, many small. For effective registration of businesses, clear guidance, standardized templates and realistic transiti on periods are indispensable in order to minimise disruptions to economic relationships between enterprises on both sides. However, instead of offering information events, webinars or at least detailed implementing rules and a web site with frequently aske d questions, China sent a letter to EU member States and other trade partners with the request to identify and register exporting businesses for 14 unclearly defined product categories within five weeks. This is clearly impossible given that we are talking about tens of thousands of businesses. As products due to be imported into China early next year have already been produced, if existing timeframes are maintained, Decrees 248 and 249 risk disrupting global food supply chains and delaying food supply into China. 2.257. The EU must note that China receives very different treatment from the EU in cases where our legislation evolves. The EU urges China to: postpone the implementation of the Decree 248 until detailed guidelines, templates and functioning web sites ar e available; provide for realistic and practicable transition periods of at least 18 months for the self -registration of businesses under Article 9 of Decree 248. Trade with businesses not yet registered should continue without disruption; once registratio ns are approved and registration numbers are allocated, provisions related to labelling under Article 15 must be implemented with adequate transition periods. In particular, products with a long shelf life, such as spirits, may be in retail stocks for many months and must be protected by transition periods of at least 36 months; and organize information sessions both for trading partners and busines so that we can have a better understanding of the new registration requirements. 2.258. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil would like to once again raise STC 611 regarding new requirements for the registration of overseas producers of imported foods. So far, both bilaterally and at the TBT Committee, the Chinese Government has not been able to clarify the risk analysis that grounded such disproportionate requirements for a wide range of food products. We understand that these requirements constitute unnecessary obstacles not only to our private sector, but also to our regulators, which must operate as the Competent National Authority for a much wider range of products. The most recent development of this regulatory process was the publication, in April 2021, by the General Administration of Customs of China (GACC), of Decrees n. 248 and 249, which deal, respectively, with administration of registration of foreign establishments and management of the safety of imported and exported food. Article 7 of Decree n. 248 defines the products for which registration will require the recommendation of the Competent National Authorities. Could the Chinese side specify the Harmonized System (HS) codes for the foods covered in this article? Could China clarify whether some products under Chapter 19 of the HS, such as the lines for cookies, cakes and oth er wheat -based products (1901.20, 1902.11, 1902.19, 1902.20, 1902.30, 1905.20, 1905.31, 1905.32, 1905.40 and 1905.90), would need to follow the more complex registration procedures? 2.259. Article 5 of Decree no. 248 requires that the food safety management syste m of the country where the producer is located has passed GACC's equivalence assessment or review. Could China explain how and when it intends to carry out these assessments? Could China indicate the criteria and procedures used to establish such equivalen ce, especially for regulators that regulate processed foods and "health foods"? The Brazilian private sector also expressed concern with the packaging requirements contained in Article 15 of Decree no. 248. Could China clarify whether there will be G/TBT/M/85 - 71 - any spe cific adaptation period for labelling requirements? If there are delays in the issuance of the registration number by the GACC, will the Chinese government allow for the importation of products without marking the registration number? Considering the need for label design and printing, will the Chinese government publish in advance additional labelling requirements such as font size and colour, format, visibility, placement and use of stickers? In September 2021, the Brazilian government received a letter f rom the GACC informing the existence of an accelerated registration procedure for food products exported to China since 2017. Attached to the communication, there is a specific list of products in this category whose importation from Brazil was accounted f or by the Chinese customs. This list, however, does not include categories of processed food products exported to China since 2017. Especially in relation to processed foods, the Brazilian government was not able to meet the tight deadline for submitting d ocuments for this fast -track registration. 2.260. Could China explain why some products exported to China since 2017 are not included in the list of accelerated registration products? Since these products are not duly mentioned in said list, will China consider e xpanding the time frames for fast -track registration? Finally, as Decrees 248 and 249 are about to come into force, the GACC has not yet shared the templates of documents to be sent by the Brazilian authorities for registration under the terms of Article 8 of Decree no. 248. Would the Chinese government be able to provide times frames for the publication of these documents? Would it be possible to grant a longer period of adaptation? 2.261. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia respects the right of WTO Members to address the safety and quality of imported food products in accordance with the TBT Agreement and without unnecessarily restricting trade. Australia thanks China for recently providing some guidance on the implementation of measures under its Regulation on Registration and Administration of Overseas Manufacturers of Imported Food (Decree 248) for food producers already exporting to China. However, Australia remains concerned t hat measures under China's Regulation on Registration and Administration of Overseas Manufacturers of Imported Food (promulgated as Decree 248) will significantly disrupt trade of food products into China. China has provided WTO Members an extremely short timeframe between initial notification of these measures in April 2021, implementation guidance only in October 2021 and intended entry into force of Decree 248 on 1 January 2022. To minimize trade disruptions for both China and exporting countries, China will need to provide sufficient time for competent authorities and businesses to comply with the Regulation. Australia is concerned that the measures will disrupt trade if an adequate transition period is not put in place in advance of entry into force. Au stralia requests that China provide Members with an extension of at least 18 months to allow governments and businesses to adjust, prepare and register before the measures enter into force. A transition period is particularly important for new food labelli ng requirements. Now less than two months out from anticipated implementation, Members are still lacking clarity on the labelling requirements for product for export in 2022. Many businesses are already producing and labelling product for export in 2022 an d would need time to adjust their settings and sell -through existing product. China's delay in clarifying how these products will be treated is creating uncertainty for exporters. 2.262. Under Article 2.7 of the TBT Agreement Members shall give positive considera tion to accepting as equivalent technical regulations of other Members, even if these differ from their own. Australia would like to discuss with China how Australia's high quality food safety systems can adequately fulfil China's objectives for imported f ood. Australia has also expressed concerns in recent SPS Committee meetings regarding the need to ensure that food safety measures under Decree 248 meet obligations under the SPS Agreement, are based on science, take account of the actual food safety risks , and are not more trade restrictive than necessary to manage the food safety risk of particular imported foods (including low risk foods). Again, Australia is ready and willing to work with China and discuss ways to meet China's food safety needs, while e nsuring trade disruptions are minimized. 2.263. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement. Indonesia thanks China for notifying the Draft Regulation on Registration and Administration of Overseas Manufacturers of Imported Food through G/TBT/N/CHN/1522 on 16 Novemb er 2020. Indonesia fully respects the rights of China's authority to protect the health and safety of its people by ensuring the safety of the food products consumed in China's market. Nonetheless, Indonesia is of the view that Decree 248 stipulated by the General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China (GACC) is more trade restrictive than necessary in achieving its legitimate objective. Being one of the largest exporting countries for food products to China with a trade value exceeding US$5.2 million in 2020, Indonesia has numerous concerns regarding the implementation of this regulation. Indonesia has G/TBT/M/85 - 72 - sent its enquiry to China TBT WTO Enquiry Point on 29 September 2021. Unfortunately, Indonesia has not received any response until now. Indonesia would like to request China to fulfill its commitment to TBT Agreement and ensure that such measures will not create unnecessary barriers to international trade. 2.264. Indonesia, therefore, would like to appeal to China to first, elaborate the justific ation for the health and safety objective China wishes to achieve by implementing such measures. Second, provide detailed information of products that will fall under this measure by identifying the six to eight digits of the HS Code. Third, update the off icial website with the English version and provide a complete and thorough implementing guideline covering the mechanism and registration procedures either through the competent authority or through independent registration as well as the registration time line and labelling requirements. Fourth, consider the necessity of registering low - risk products, and lastly, grant a reasonable transition period for manufacturers to implement the measures for at least twelve months from 1 January 2022. China has been a valued and strategic trading partner for Indonesia for a broad range of products, including food and beverages. Indonesia wishes to continue becoming a strategic trading partner to China. Indonesia fervently hopes that China reconsiders the timing for the implementation of this measure. Indonesia looks forward to China's response and welcomes bilateral discussion shortly on this prominent matter. 2.265. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement. The delegation of Mexico refers to Decree 248 of the General Administration of Customs of China in relation to the Regulations on the Registration and Administration of Overseas Manufactures of Imported Food, notified to the Members of this Committee on 16 November 2020 in document G/TBT/N/CHN/1522 . While the Government of Mexi co recognizes the sovereign right of every country to determine regulatory measures to fulfil their legitimate objectives and shares the Government of China's aim of ensuring the legal origin of food imported into the country, we also attach great importan ce to the need to consider alternatives that are not more trade -restrictive than necessary and that observe and comply with international commitments when deciding on such measures. The delegation of Mexico reiterates the concerns raised in this Committee during the previous meetings in February and June of this year, regarding Decree 248 and its implementation process, including the registration application for exporting companies. It therefore requests the delegation of China to reconsider the proposed da te of entry into force in January 2022, owing to the concerns and uncertainty that this measure has caused among the Members of this forum, with a view to allowing a dialogue with stakeholders in order to strike a balance between the objective pursued and the best way to proceed without affecting importers. Furthermore, it reiterates the need to define the scope of application of Decree 248 in order to have clarity regarding the type of exporters subject to the registration requirement and to extend the rel evant deadline for registration. The delegation of Mexico thanks the delegation of China for giving its consideration to this statement and reiterates the importance of observing the international commitments to which we are bound as Members of this Organi zation, with the objective of implementing measures that facilitate, and do not create unnecessary obstacles to, international trade. 2.266. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada and other Members continue to raise significant conc erns and challenges with China's administrative measures for the registration of overseas manufacturers of imported food. Canada is concerned that Decree 248 will negatively impact trade. Over the years, Canada and China have implemented many bilateral arrangements that have successfully maintained the safe trade in food between our respective nations. Canada remains concerned that the administrative measures being implemented by China are overly burdensome and unjustified. These measures are broad and over -arching in scope, and will have a significant impact on exports to China. It remains unclear how Decree 248 will contribute to achieving China's appropriate level of protection and, if implemented in its current form, the new Decree will likely create ser ious barriers to trade including significant financial impacts on both industry and foreign competent authorities. Canada is disappointed that Decree 248 was adopted and published by the General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China ( Customs China) immediately following the deadline for comments by WTO Members without sufficiently taking into account comments and concerns from Members. The lack of discussions and information from China on the new Decree is creating uncertainty and conc ern among trading partners. Greater clarity and information is necessary to ensure that industry stakeholders and foreign competent authorities understand and are able to comply with the requirements. 2.267. Canada remains deeply concerned that these measures wil l create confusion for competent authorities and industry due to the lack of details and transparency from China regarding the G/TBT/M/85 - 73 - implementation of these new requirements. Canada urges China to delay the implementation of Decree 248 for 18 months to allow bot h foreign governments and industry to fully understand and comply with the new requirements contained in the Decree. During the proposed delay, Canada calls on China to provide further clarity and hold discussions with Members in a timely manner so there is sufficient time for trading partners, including both competent authorities and industry, to comply with China's new measures. Although Canada did respond to China's 31 October 2021 deadline for information on "medium risk" commodities as part of Decree 2 48 requirements, the purpose of the request remains unclear, creating additional uncertainty within Canadian industry. In conclusion, Canada urges China to provide Members with additional information and clarification on the implementation of Decree 248 an d delay its implementation to provide sufficient time to address this uncertainly and allow trading partners to comply with the new requirements. 2.268. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea understands China's effort s in ensuring food safety to protect the health of its people, but Korea would like to reiterate its concern as China has not provided clear response to concerns continually expressed by Korea and a number of Member states regarding the Administrative Meas ure since its draft was first notified in 2019. It is more trade -restrictive than required to have competent authorities obliged with registration of food manufacturers, processors, and storage facilities with the Chinese government even for low -risk food products listed in Article 7 of Decree 248. It is even inharmonious with the global practices, in which most of the countries require competent authorities of exporting countries to be responsible of facility registration only for animal products. Remindin g China's obligation as a Party of WTO TBT Agreement, Korea requests China for providing scientific evidence for the aforementioned Article 7. As far as we know, Decree 248 enters into force on 1 January 2022. But, China requested Korea for submitting the list of manufacturers subject to government registration by 31 October 2021. However, to date, China has not provided detailed guidelines such as HS codes of the additional fourteen items that there are difficulties in identifying export items subject to t he Chinese regulation and in submitting the required list. 2.269. Therefore, Korea would like to request China for providing detailed guidelines at its earliest convenience for export items that require registration through competent authorities of exporting countries and the items that are subject to registration by private businesses. We would also like to postpone the date of implementation of the Administrative Measure to provide time for exporting countries and manufacturers to prepare for it. China is a very important trading partner for Korea as it is the second largest market for Korean agricultural products. And changes in China's regulation will significantly impact bilateral trade. Therefore, Korea requests China to take heed of our view and will wait fo r China's response to the comment of Korea. 2.270. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement. Switzerland shares the concerns expressed by other Members regarding the two decrees 248 and 249 published by the General Administration of Cust oms of the People's Republic of China (GACC). Switzerland understands and supports China's objective to ensure that only safe food is imported. We regret that the measures still include all food categories irrespective of their risk -profile and seem to be more trade restrictive than necessary to ensure the safety of imported food products. We therefore reiterate our concerns expressed in previous meetings. Switzerland notes that there are still many open questions for which we - as well as our industry - do not have sufficient information. Examples of incomplete information include product categories (by their HS codes), the types of operations that will need to be registered or questions regarding labelling. Switzerland encourages China to brief all interes ted WTO Members on the detailed guidelines, implementing rules and template forms at the earliest possible date. It is important that we all have access to the same information, which can then be shared with competent authorities and the industry. Furtherm ore, Switzerland invites China to foresee realistic and practicable implementation and transition periods and asks for an extension by at least 18 months. 2.271. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan shares the concerns with other Me mbers on China's regulation on registration and administration of overseas manufacturers of imported food (GAC Order No. 248) We understand China published the explanatory annotation article by article via website. We also understand China held the explana tory meeting in Shanghai on this regulation. We appreciate China's efforts to provide additional information and to let relevant people informed, but we received a new letter from GACC at the end of September. This letter asked to provide GACC the list of companies until the end of October, the last month. This timeline was unrealistic. Moreover, the details continue to be insufficient. We are deeply disappointed with the lack of information, especially with the ambiguity of the regulation 's G/TBT/M/85 - 74 - scope of food i tems. Since China specifies the scope of the regulation only by product names and not by HS codes, it is unclear whether various food items would be affected by this regulation. The explanatory annotation implied to announce HS codes via website, but this information has not been uploaded to the website yet. Japan suggests "foodstuffs" stipulated in Article 9 should be specified by the HS code, and the concrete number of HS code should be announced as soon as possible. Furthermore, GACC opened a website so that private companies can apply for registration by themselves. However, this website is still in a test phase, which causes a pretty big confusion among private sector in Japan. 2.272. In addition to these, we are not informed of the clear timeframe from the a pplication to the registration by GACC. We think this measure lacks the necessary transparency in this sense. The lack of transparency will cause a significant negative impact on trade with all other WTO Members. We have already heard from many companies t hat they are worried about lack of time preparing for this regulation and it might interrupt the existing trade after the enforcement of regulation. This shows the proposed measure has already created unnecessary trade barriers between China and other WTO Members. We suggest that China take account of the comments and concerns from the WTO Members and reconsider the timing of the enactment of the regulations. As we have already submitted a joint letter with some other Members to the GACC, Japan also request s China to provide a sufficient transition period of 18 months after providing WTO Members with a satisfactory information to ensure that the regulations do not negatively impact trade between China and other WTO Members. 2.273. The representative of Turkey provided the following statement. Turkey would like to thank the other delegations for bringing this issue to the agenda and share the concerns expressed in their statements regarding the Draft Administrative Measures for Registration of Overseas Producers of Imported Foods of China. Turkey believes that Decree 248 covers a wide range of food items and its product coverage and details of the implementation need further clarifications. Additionally, anticipated system for registering exporting businesses is burde nsome not only for overseas producers of given food items, but also for competent authorities of exporting countries, especially considering the complexity of the new system of registration process and short time frames provided. Turkey, therefore, would l ike to ask China to provide additional information and clarification regarding the implementation of the Decree 248 and postpone the implementation of the new registration system at least 18 months in order to allow both governments and businesses to adopt to the new system. 2.274. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement. We see that the two overriding suggestions, which we hope China will accommodate, are the provision of sufficient information and briefings on the measure and the e xtension of the transition period. We have submitted comments and asked clarifications to China, first on 2 February 2021, and then again on 11 May 2021. We subsequently received replies after the June meeting of the Committee. We continue to evaluate thes e replies as they seem to merely restate the textual provisions of Decree 248. We have also requested an extension of the 31 October 2021 deadline for submission of the list of manufacturers that would be subject to government registration. China has not r eplied to this. We respect China's right to regulate in order to ensure food safety. The Philippines, nevertheless, joins other WTO Members in requesting China to abide by the clear rules of the TBT Agreement and ensure that its regulations do not create u nnecessary obstacles to trade and are not more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil its legitimate objectives. 2.275. The representative of Peru provided the following statement. Peru echoes the concerns expressed by the preceding Members. In this regard, P eru wishes to express its concern about the negative impact that Decree 248 would have on international trade. We also support the proposal made by other Members, requesting that China postpone the implementation of Decree 248, as companies and authorities need time to adapt to the new provisions. Furthermore, we urge China to provide sufficient information about this Decree and its implementation. Lastly, we reiterate the importance of complying with the international commitments under the TBT Agreement, w ith a view to implementing measures that do not create unnecessary barriers to trade. 2.276. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. In order to effectively implement the "Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China" and its implementing regulations, China revised the original "Administrative Measures for Registration of Overseas Manufacturers of Import Foods". The new version （Decree 248 ）was released on 12 April 2021 and will take effect from 1 January 2022. Before China released Decree 248, a notification had been G/TBT/M/85 - 75 - made to the WTO. Comments from Members had been received, reasonable suggestions an d recommendations were accepted. China had also set a transitional period before its implementation. These provisions optimize the registration procedures, implement classified management for different categories of overseas production enterprises, clarify the responsibilities of enterprises and the supervisory responsibilities of the competent authorities of the country (region) in which the enterprise is located, and specify the application of the provisions. The above provisions shall not affect the impl ementation of the agreements signed between Members with China. In order to ensure that the food trade will proceed normally after the implementation of Decree 248, in September the General Administration of Customs has notified the relevant Members in wri tten format about the application for registration of overseas food production enterprises of different categories and the requirements of the materials to be submitted. The interpretation of the Decree 248 and implementation of the guidance documents will be issued shortly. We will inform all parties in a timely manner. 2.1.3.30 Peru - Supreme Decree No. 015 -2019 -SA, which amends the Manual of Advertising Warnings approved by Supreme Decree No. 012 -2018 -SA (ID 61874) 2.277. The representative of Costa Rica provided the fo llowing statement. Costa Rica wishes to thank Peru for keeping it informed of the progress of the process to implement the draft Regulation established under Supreme Decree No. 015-2019-SA, which amends the Manual of Advertising Warnings approved by Suprem e Decree No. 012-2018-SA. The delegation of Peru recently informed us that the entry into force of this Regulation had been postponed until 30 March 2022. Although this postponement offers some respite for our exporters, we wish nonetheless to reiterate ou r concern and respectfully request that the Peruvian authorities consider permitting the use of adhesive labels on a reciprocal basis, given that these labels may be used on Peruvian food products to be marketed in Central America. The food industry has in formed us of the negative repercussions on trade that a potential discontinuation of the use of adhesive labels would entail. It should be noted that the use of adhesive labels is widely recognized internationally, as such labels achieve the same public he alth protection and consumer information purposes achieved by permanent labels. At the CODEX level, for example, Articles 8.1.1 and 8.2.1 of CODEX -STAN 1-1985, General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods, permit the use of supplementary or adhe sive labels, as long as it is guaranteed that they will not become separated from the container, or in cases where the language on the original label is not acceptable to the consumer for whom it is intended. Furthermore, we note that countries with labell ing schemes requiring the use of high fat, sodium or sugar content warnings, similar to Peru's, have considered supplementary labelling using stickers, which not only provides the required level of protection but also makes it easier for exporters to compl y with non -harmonized international requirements. Peruvian food products sent to the Costa Rican market are able to comply with domestic labelling requirements through the use of supplementary adhesive labels, instead of having to affix permanent labels in the country of origin, exclusively for the Costa Rican market. This undoubtedly fosters trade and is proportionate to the level of protection sought. We therefore ask for reciprocity of treatment. 2.278. Moreover, we note that other Peruvian instruments, such as Supreme Decree No. 007-98-SA adopting the regulations on sanitary surveillance and control of food and beverages, permit the use of stickers to meet labelling requirements, given that this is an appropriate means for the fulfilment of the proposed legitim ate objectives. The fact that Peruvian legislation, in other instruments, permits the use of an adhesive or additional label no doubt shows that there are less trade -restrictive measures through which it is possible to fulfil the proposed legitimate object ives, in accordance with the obligations regarding technical barriers to trade established in the relevant World Trade Organization Agreement and in the existing Agreement between our countries. Costa Rica would like to emphasize once again, as it has alre ady done before this Committee, that in light of the current situation faced by the world as a result of COVID -19, international cooperation in all areas is crucial for tackling the crisis and laying the groundwork for a swift economic recovery post -pandem ic, through the promotion of trade -facilitating measures, as opposed to measures that might create technical barriers to trade and hinder economic recovery. In view of the above, we respectfully restate Costa Rica's wish that the Peruvian authorities remov e the proposal to prohibit the use of stickers and maintain the possibility of permitting their permanent use. 2.279. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia thanks Peru for its consideration of the concern regarding the use of a dhesive advertising warning labels under 74 For previous stateme nts follow the thread under ID 618 . G/TBT/M/85 - 76 - paragraph 8.3 of section 8 of the Manual of Advertising Warnings approved by Supreme Decree No. 012-2018-SA. Given the recent publication of DS 018 -2021-SA, extending the deadline for the use of adhesive labels to 3 1 March 2022, Colombia thanks Peru for this additional time period but considers that this requirement should be maintained on a permanent basis and that the deadline should not continue to be extended via specific deadlines or for fairly limited periods. Colombia reiterates that this policy, while seeking to promote and protect public health, should be implemented in a manner that is not more restrictive than necessary and does not subsequently create an unnecessary obstacle to trade. Colombia also conside rs that allowing the use of adhesive labels does not distort the purpose of the Peruvian standard, since the warnings, whether included on adhesive labels or printed directly on the packaging of products, will continue to be clear, legible, prominent and c omprehensible, as required by the regulations. We reiterate that this standard on labelling that is so specific to a particular market and is binding in the country of origin constitutes a major access barrier, particularly for small and medium -sized enter prises, and does not take into consideration complicated distribution and logistics processes, which require certainty as to the applicable rules for the marketing of products in the medium and long term. Furthermore, extending the use of adhesive labels f or six -month periods causes uncertainty and creates management difficulties for companies when exporting to Peru. We would therefore like Peru to take into account these considerations and study the possibility of amending the regulations so as to allow th e use of adhesive labels on permanent basis. We welcome the bilateral talks that have taken place at different levels, and the progress duly reported. 2.280. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union (EU) apprec iates that Peru further extended the possibility to use stickers for compliance with labelling requirements for processed foods, until 31 March 2022. However, the EU would like to repeat once again the urgent invitation to Peru to provide for a permanent p ossibility to use stickers. The EU recognizes that reliable information to the Peruvian consumer is a legitimate objective. Nevertheless, the obligation to print information on the product package is trade restrictive and represents a disproportionate burd en for foreign producers, in particular SMEs. In the EU and in most countries around the world, stickers are allowed for food products, provided that the information is accurate and the stickers are not easily removable. We are committed to working with Peru bilaterally on this issue. 2.281. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil regrets having to once again express its concerns regarding labelling requirements expressed in the Manual of Advertising Warnings approved by Supreme Decre e 012 -2018-SA (notified under G/TBT/N/PER/97/Add.1 and amended by Supreme Decree 015 -2019-SA (unnotified). The use of stickers is a widespread practice internationally, as it does not affect the provision of reliable information to consumers. Codex standard CODEX -STAN 1 -1985 for pre -packaged goods, Articles 8.1.1 and 8.2.1, explicitly allows for the possibility of using additional labels or stickers, as long as they are attached to the packaging and if the language of the original label is not necessarily that of the consu mer for whom it is intended. Brazil shares Peru's endeavour to ensure the highest health standards through technical regulations that help better inform consumers. Despite Peruvian legitimate concerns with deceptive practices, advances in labelling technol ogies allow for their safe affixation. We acknowledge that, according to Supreme Decree 018 -2021-SA, the entry into force of the prohibition on stickers was delayed until 31 March 2022. However, Brazil would like to respectfully ask Peru to permanently align its labelling requirements with current international standards established under the Codex and withdraw the prohibition of stickers for the products under the scope of the Manual of Advertising Warnings. Brazil considers such postponement a provisional solution and will continue to raise this STC until Peru permanently removes its burdensome requirements for food labelling. 2.282. The representative of Chile provided the following statement. Chile appreciates the opportunity to comment on the implementation pr ocess for the draft regulation laid down in Supreme Decree No. 015-2019-SA, which amends the Manual of Advertising Warnings approved by Peru. As was indicated by the delegations that spoke before me, food exporting companies and trade associations are conc erned by the fact that adhesive labels/stickers shall only be accepted until the end of March 2022, and not on a permanent basis. 2.283. In response, the representative of Peru provided the following statement. As we have done at previous meetings, Peru wishes to reiterate that it is committed to its work to protect the health of its citizens and vulnerable groups, such as children and adolescents, through public policies aimed at achieving this goal, in accordance with the country's international trade commitment s in this domain. In this connection, Peru is seeking to ensure that the information contained in the Manual G/TBT/M/85 - 77 - of Advertising Warnings (MAP) reaches consumers clearly and effectively, so that they can make informed choices. In response to the concerns expres sed by some Members, Peru, by means of Supreme Decree No. 018-2021-SA, extended again until 31 March 2022, the period during which the use of adhesive warning labels, provided for in paragraph 8.3 of section 8 of Supreme Decree No. 012-2018-SA approving th e MAP under Law No. 30021, Law to promote healthy eating among children and adolescents. Lastly, we reiterate that Peru wishes to honour its WTO commitments, and, in this connection, Peru reaffirms its commitment to not prepare, adopt or apply technical regulations that may create unnecessary barriers to international trade, as established in the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. 2.1.3.31 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - Technical Regulation for limiting and restricting hazardous materials in electrical and electro nic equipment, G/TBT/N/S AU/1166 (ID 66675) 2.284. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan shares concerns about the Technical Regulation for Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE). Japan understands that the regulation was promulgated on 9 July 2021. At the past WTO/TBT Committee meetings, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia stated that it would make the conformity assessment procedures reasonable in response to comments from many countries. However, the international standard for type approval ISO/IEC 17067, which many c ountries consider problematic, was adopted for granting certificates of conformity under the promulgated regulation. In addition, if the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Government will amend the conformity assessment procedure, there is the possibility that import s will be suspended because companies do not have enough preparation time by the enforcement date that is assumed to be January 2022. Also, in this situation where details of the conformity assessment procedures have not yet been presented, it is impossibl e to complete the certification procedures by the date of enforcement for manufacturers importing many kinds of products. Japan requests that a sufficient transitional period be given for obtaining certification before the date of enforcement and requests that this technical regulation be harmonized with international standards and practices, that the above -mentioned concerns be dispelled, and that the implementation of these regulations be promptly clarified, so that they will not create unnecessary obstac le to international trade. 2.285. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to reiterate its concerns regarding the draft Technical Regulation for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, notified by Saud i Arabia on 1 December 2020. The EU would like to refer for details to its written comments of March 2021 and to the minutes of the previous TBT Committees. In particular, the EU would like to repeat the invitation to Saudi Arabia to reconsider the require ment of third -party conformity certification, which deviates from common international practice that relies on first party declaration of conformity. The EU also invites Saudi Arabia to provide for a sufficiently long transition period that would ensure a smooth implementation and adaptation for economic operators. The EU would like to ask Saudi Arabia about the state of implementation of the measure and any planned guidance to industry. Finally, the EU would also like to underline again the importance of p romoting the GCC harmonized requirements, which should also guarantee their uniform application and a mutual recognition of conformity assessment results in the region. The European Union remains available to discuss this issue with Saudi Arabia bilaterall y. 2.286. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement. The United Kingdom thanks Saudi Arabia for their continued engagement on this technical regulation. We continue to encourage Saudi Arabia to accept self -declaration as a means of demonstrating product conformity, which UK industry has previously evidenced as proportionate to product risk. Acceptance of self -declaration would provide a less trade -restrictive means of achieving Saudi Arabia's legitimate objective. We now understand that Saudi Arabia intends to develop guidelines to support compliance with third party certification procedures. We also understand that these guidelines will address comments raised on the scope of this measure and product exemptions. The United Kingdom n otes this intention with interest and requests confirmation on the development process, the timelines, and on plans to consult with international industry. The United Kingdom appreciates the constructive engagement to date, Saudi Arabia's willingness to di scuss this issue, and welcome continued productive interaction on this matter. 75 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 666 . G/TBT/M/85 - 78 - 2.287. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States reiterates its concerns regarding the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's notification of its " Technical Regulation for the Restrictions of Hazardous Substances (RoHS)", which we understand was published in the Official Gazette July and will enter into force on 5 January 2022. While we appreciate SASO's willingness to engage with us and other stakeh olders regarding this regulation to date, there remains a great deal of confusion on several details associated with the measure. In addition, in the absence of clarification and detailed guidance, manufacturers and conformity assessment bodies will face m any challenges implementing this measure particularly since the proposed measure deviates significantly from international practices regulating RoHS that rely on a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity. Saudi Arabia instead proposed a mandatory conformity a ssessment procedure based on a technical file of supporting documentation for a supplier's declaration of conformity, a third -party conformity assessment by approved bodies and test reports from an accredited laboratory. 2.288. Most significantly, the Type Approv al Conformity Assessment testing and certification regime and required factory certifications outlined in the draft regulation raise concerns regarding the potential of the measure to create unnecessary obstacles to trade. The United States requests that Saudi Arabia align its proposed regulation with international practice, clarify the required procedures, and avoid creating any duplicative or unnecessarily trade restrictive conformity assessment requirements. We also remain interested in receiving further details from Saudi Arabia in a number of areas: First, we continue to urge Saudi Arabia to provide clarification of the precise scope of the regulation. For example, some of the HS codes in the annex cover products, such as batteries, that are outside of the scope of the categories covered by the final regulation. Further, the definition of hazardous substances refers to radioactive substances, yet some of the regulated substances are not actually radioactive. Also, there are missing exemptions for certain necessary uses of the regulated substances for products in the monitoring and controlling equipment category. Second, we request further guidance on the process for testing whole equipment and/or critical components of a product. We understand that typica lly other WTO Members have not asked industry to provide test reports on critical components as such testing requires dismantling the product and destroying its parts. Saudi Arabia's proposed approach may be more strict than is necessary to give Saudi Arabia adequate confidence of product conformity, and result in added costs and delays in getting products to market. We request that Saudi Arabia provide a process for manufacturers to meet the RoHS requirements without providing test reports for critical com ponents. 2.289. Third, we request that the requirement for suppliers to attach the entire technical file of supporting documentation proving compliance to their products, be modified to instead require a copy of the certificate of conformity from the conformity a ssessment body, as consumers will not be able to discern compliance from a technical file, and the technical file likely contains proprietary business information. Fourth, we request that Saudi Arabia provide as soon as possible the guidance it intends for notified bodies regarding this measure, and outline plans for engagement with trading partners and private sector stakeholders to ensure such guidance is as clear as possible for those who must comply with and enforce the rules, possibly in the form of fr equently asked questions (FAQ), as has been done with other WTO Members' RoHS regimes. Given the number and significance of these concerns, it is difficult to understand how this proposed measure can be implemented by the proposed date for entry into force on 5 January 2022. Therefore, the United States requests that Saudi Arabia delay implementation of this proposed measure until the range of concerns are adequately addressed. Such a pause will allow continued dialogue between the United States and SASO as we seek to prevent the creation of unnecessary obstacles to trade. The United States looks forward to continuing a dialogue with Saudi Arabia, and to providing additional information where needed to address those areas that require further guidance to min imize the trade restrictive impact on industry. 2.290. The representative of China provided the following statement. We support Saudi Arabia's restrictions on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic products, however, the draft regulation proposed by Sa udi Arabia is still inconsistent with the international practice, especially the provisions on conformity assessment procedures which will create unnecessary obstacles to trade. China would like to raise concerns as follows. 1. According to Article 5 and A ppendix 3, suppliers need to obtain a conformity certificate (Type 1a) from an approved certification organization. However, according to the practice of global implementation of RoHS, it is usually the manufacturer to prepare technical documents for produ cts to prove their conformity in the light of international standard IEC 63000 and to provide a conformity declaration. In response to the testing report requirements described in the notified regulations, a full product testing report means that companies need to test every single component, at the homogenous material level, which is G/TBT/M/85 - 79 - extremely time consuming and resource consuming. On the contrary, the international standard IEC 63000 allows manufacturers to work with their supply chains to compile technic al documentation as evidence of compliance, which is a common procedure or method for restrictions on hazardous substances implemented and accepted internationally. Therefore, it is recommended that the conformity assessment procedure would comply with cur rent global practices, and the preparation of technical documents would comply with IEC 63000. 2.291. 2. The application scope of the draft regulations of this notification is electrical and electronic equipment, but the batteries and accumulators (HS code 8506 a nd 8507) are included in Appendix. Based on the differences between batteries and electrical and electronic equipment, and with reference to the current management and control method worldwide, it is recommended that this regulation excludes batteries and accumulators from the scope of control. 3. Regarding the allowable percentage of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment or devices specified in Appendix, the percentage of many materials (copper alloys, steel alloys, and high -temperatu re solders, etc.) is currently unable to meet the limitation of regulations due to immature technology or no alternative materials. It is recommended to refer to Annex III of the EU Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS) or the "Exemption List for Application of Rest ricted Substances in the Compliance Management Catalogue" issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China to clarify the corresponding exemptions. 4. In view of the impact of COVID -19 on the global supply chain, we suggest the transi tional period for the implementation of the regulations be extended from six months after its publication to 12 months, in order to provide sufficient time for manufacturers to replace raw materials and upgrade products in accordance with regulatory requir ements. 2.292. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement. Switzerland would like to support the interventions made by previous speakers on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Technical Regulation for limiting and restricting hazardous materials in electrical and electronic equipment. While we share the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's legitimate objective to protect the environment and public health and safety, Switzerland remains concerned that these requirements may have a negative impact on trade fo r a wide range of products. The testing and certification requirements continue to deviate from common international practices which include supplier's declaration of conformity and technical documentations aligned to the appropriate relevant international standard. We encourage the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to consider less trade -restrictive alternatives and take these best practices into account. We would also like to reiterate our call on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to allow for a sufficient implementation period so as to allow the industry to adapt to these new requirements. As we understand, uncertainties remain related to the scope of these requirements. We encourage the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to implement clear and transparent guidelines and to align t he scope of these requirements with internationally accepted RoHS requirements, such as those used in Switzerland and elsewhere in Europe. Finally, Switzerland would appreciate if the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia could clarify the state of implementation of the se measures. 2.293. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada shares the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's legitimate objective pursued by this measure as it relates to the protection of the environment, as well as public health and safety. Ho wever, Canada would like to raise the following concerns related to the Technical Regulation for Restriction of hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, as published in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Official Gazette, on 9 July 2021: The testing and certification requirements seem to deviate from the widely replicated EU RoHS Directive, the other aspects of which are very similar to the proposed Saudi measure. The EU Directive's best practices include acceptance of a supplier's declaratio n of conformity and technical documentation aligned to the appropriate relevant international standard (ISO 63000). Unlike the EU's requirement, Saudi Arabia's directive requires exporters to supply a sample of their product for testing by a notified Saudi Conformity Assessment Body, which would inject significant costs into the supply chain. We would appreciate it if Saudi Arabia could provide Members with a better appreciation of the objectives that this testing would achieve. We would also encourage the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to adopt internationally accepted best practices. In addition, Canada calls on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to allow for a sufficient implementation period that allows the industry to adapt to these new requirements. Canada looks for ward to further engaging with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on this topic. 2.294. In response, the representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statement. Saudi Arabia is aiming at protecting human health and safety, and the environment, to ensure that hazardous substances are not above certain levels in consumer products such as G/TBT/M/85 - 80 - electrical and electronic equipment. Consequently, Saudi Arabia would like to clarify the following: Saudi Arabia has notified of the measure in December 2020 and re ceived comments until May 2021. The transitional period is set at 180 days after publishing the regulation in the Official Gazette for Manufacturers to take corrective actions. Saudi Arabia has aligned the last version of the Saudi Technical Regulation wit h international practices like EU RoHS. As for the conformity assessment procedures, SASO has chosen to apply the international standard ISO/IEC 17067 for granting certificates of conformity (Type Approval) to products issued by Notified Conformity Assessm ent Bodies. Moreover, the test report is considered valid unless any change in the materials used to manufacture the type. In case it is not possible to perform the test on the entire product, the critical components of the device must be tested, which are determined by the manufacturer based on the risk assessment and documents assessing the risk of those components on the final product in accordance with the standard IEC 63000. 2.295. Within this framework, SASO develops conformity assessment activities (certifi cation, audit and inspection, and testing activities) in Saudi Arabia to be one of the tributaries that raise the level of quality in the national industry and the safety of imported goods presented in the Saudi market. By accepting the conformity assessme nt bodies in the various conformity assessment activities, this process aims to ensure the efficiency of the outputs of the accepted conformity assessment bodies operating in the conformity verification activities within the systems and requirements of the technical regulations approved to provide the necessary activities according to the scopes of acceptance of these bodies. Therefore, SASO chose to engage a notified third -party responsible for granting conformity certificates in accordance with the intern ational standard ISO/IEC 17067 as part of the Kingdom pre -market approach. Saudi Arabia is highly interested in the public's participation, including those concerned and interested in expressing their opinion on the regulation. Therefore, guidance will be provided to all stakeholders as soon as possible, taking into consideration the valuable comments received from trading partners and private sector stakeholders to ensure such guidance is clear for those who must comply with and enforce the rules. The requ irements of the technical regulation for Restriction of Hazardous Substances in electrical and electronic equipment are in line with international practices. Therefore, the transitional period set at 180 days after publishing the regulation in the Official Gazette is sufficient to fulfil all requirements. 2.1.3.32 India - Pneumatic tyres and tubes for automotive vehicles, G/TBT/N/IND/20, G/TBT/N/IND/20/Add.1, G/TBT/N/IND/40, G/TBT/N/IND/40/Rev.1 (ID 13376) 2.296. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement. Indonesia would like to reiterate its concern on Pneumatic Tyres and Tubes f or Automotive Vehicles as raised previously in June 2021. Indonesia has also communicated its concern through Permanent Mission of India in Geneva, yet India has not provided substantive response to Indonesia's concern. Indonesia understands that India has imposed loyalty or marking fees for tyre products with IS marking. Indonesia remains concerned that the imposition of marking fees is burdensome and has become a unnecessary obstacle to trade. The imposition of marking fees is also having no legitimate justification with no strong relation to protection of human health, safety or prevention from deceptive practice. Indonesia also regrets the measures taken by India in imposing import restriction for certain types of tyres. This import restriction provision s were issued shortly after India banned the importation of tyre products to India for a period of six months as in notification no. 12/2015 - 2020 dated 12 June 2020 regarding Amendment in Import Policy of Tyres. These policies have impacted Indonesia's exp ort and disrupted the flow of goods to India. Indonesia urges India to ensure that the implementation of the regulation and technical requirements for tyres are not discriminative between imported and domestic products. According to information from our exporters, India has currently banned importation for tyres produced domestically. Indonesia is of the view that this policy is not in line with non -discriminatory principle as set out in Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement. Indonesia is looking forward to Indi a's response on this issue and requests India to review the policy to ensure compliance with the non -discriminatory principle. 2.297. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. We had a bilateral meeting in which we tried to clarif y your point, nonetheless we will reiterate the same here again. The BIS operates a Product Certification Scheme as per the Scheme -1 of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulation, 2018 under BIS Act, 2016. Under the scheme, Product Certification licences to both domestic and foreign manufacturers are given. Both of them must pay the necessary fees, and there is no discrimination between domestic and foreign manufacturers. The fee is inclusive of 76 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 133 . G/TBT/M/85 - 81 - the marking for each of the products; the marking fee for each pro duct is specified as a) Minimum Marking fee per annum and b) Unit and Unit rate. The manufacturer is required to pay a minimum marking fee in advance for the licence's validity period. The actual marking fee for each year is calculated by multiplying the u nit rate. The actual marking fee or the minimum marking fee for the year, whichever is higher, is payable by the manufacturer. The marking fee is chargeable on all the production of tyres carrying ISI marks. 2.1.3.33 Russian Federation - Draft Technical Regulation on Alcohol Drinks Safety (published on 24 October 2011), G/TBT/N/RUS/2 (ID 33277) 2.298. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. In 2012, the Russian Federation notified a draft technical regulation on the safety of alcoholic products to be adopted by the Eurasian Economic Union. An updated version was adopted in December 2018 and currently schedul ed to enter into force on 1 January 2022. The revision process seems to be delayed following the last meeting of the EEC Consultative Committee and therefore this scheduled date seems to be very difficult to comply with (unless the technical regulation ent ers into force in its 2018 version, without revision). It appears that only in January 2022 it will be known if the new rules will be in force, which adds to the already existing unpredictability on the market. Could Russia clarify the current revision pro cess: is the revision still ongoing and a new amendment being drafted? Could Russia clarify the foreseen timetable? The EU took the opportunity of the ongoing revision process of the Eurasian Economic Union Technical Regulation 047/2018 "On the safety of a lcoholic products" and submitted on 19 May to the Eurasian Economic Commission a series of drafting proposals. In light of transparency and considering the trade implications of this regulation, we understand that the revised draft technical regulation wil l be subject to public consultation and that it will be notified to the WTO under the TBT Agreement. 2.299. We are firmly convinced that the EU proposal, the focus of which is to better align some provisions with international standards and practices for alcoholi c products, as well as WTO obligations, could ease the implementation and enforcement of the technical regulation by all operators, facilitate international trade of alcoholic products both ways, and, thus, contribute to the goal pursued by the Eurasian Ec onomic Commission through this text. The European Union would like to ask Russia to take these comments into consideration in the new drafting, if envisaged, and to renotify the new version of the measure, under the TBT Agreement as well as under the TRIPS Agreement. 2.300. In response, the representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement. As rightly mentioned by the EU delegation, amendments to the technical regulation on safety of alcohol beverages are now being developed. Unfortunately, no precise timeline for the finalization of the drafting process can be provided now. When amendments are developed, the draft will be notified under the Agreement on TBT. Currently, it is scheduled that the technical regulation in its present version ent ers into force on 1 January 2022. 2.1.3.34 European Union - Draft Implementing Regulations amending Regulation (EC) No. 607/2009 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards protected designations of origin and ge ographical indications, traditional terms, labelling and presentation of certain wine sector products, G/TBT/N/EU/44, G/TBT/N/EEC/264, G/TBT/N/EEC/264/Add.1, G/TBT/N/EU/570, G/TBT/N/EU/571 (ID 34578) 2.301. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. It is very disappointing that the United States must again raise its concerns with the European Unio n's (EU) revisions to its draft regulation on geographical indications and traditional terms for wine; and specifically, our industry's pending applications for traditional terms which were submitted to the EU well over 11 years ago. The EU has failed to p rovide sufficient transparency about this process and has hindered market access for our exporters for over a decade. The EU's persistent failure to provide any information leaves us no choice but to raise this issue here again at the WTO TBT Committee, as well as at the WTO Council for Trade in Goods. Since the June 2018 TBT Committee meeting, the EU has been saying that the pending applications for traditional terms are still under consideration, but that it could not provide a precise timeline for approv al. Why is the EU still unable to provide 77 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 332 . 78 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 345 . G/TBT/M/85 - 82 - any estimate or tell us where in the process these applications are after three years? What does the EU mean when it said "under consideration?" Are they being actively considered, or have they been put on hold? If the applications have been put on hold, please explain why. At each TBT Committee since November 2019, we have asked for transparency about the status of other applications so that we can see how our applications compare. 2.302. As requested during the last fiv e TBT Committee meetings, please tell us the following: How many applications for traditional terms have been lodged over the last 11 years? How many of those applications have been approved, rejected, or remain pending? What is the average time between application and a final decision? For pending applications, how long have they been waiting? For pending application, how many of the applications have come from member States? How has the processing of these applications changed, if at all, over the last tw o years following the adoption of Implementing Regulation 2019/34? Does the EU intend to answer these questions which have been posed repeatedly since November 2019? We also have additional questions that have gone unanswered including the following: Could the EU confirm that US producers can continue to use any generic term, such as a grape variety, that is part of a compound term protected as a GI by the EU? For example, could US producers still use the grape variety "Dolcetto," even though the EU protect s the compound name "Dolcetto d'Alba?" How do third countries find out about amended changes with respect to EU Protected Designations of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indications? In its response to our TBT comments, the EU indicated that partie s "… may submit an application to the Commission objecting to [an] application … within two months of the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union." We would like to remind the EU of its obligations under Article 2.9 of the TBT Agr eement to notify the WTO of these changes in draft form so that parties may comment through the formal WTO process. What is the definition of "generic?" Lastly, we continue to seek confirmation that the revised regulation will not alter the ability of US producers to use terms such as "barrel aged" as provided for in Appendix II of the Protocol on Labelling to the 2006 US/EU Wine Agreement. In its response to our TBT comments, the EU indicated that "consumers' expectations have been taken into account by re serving some labelling particulars concerning specific production methods." Based on this response, we remain unsure if the term "barrel aged" can still be used and ask that the EU please clarify. 2.303. The representative of New Zealand provided the following st atement. We refer the European Union to New Zealand's statement on this trade concern made at the June 2021 TBT Committee, and those preceding it. 2.304. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU understands t he continued interest of the United States and other Members in this issue. The EU has completed the revision of its internal legislation on traditional terms discussed in previous TBT Committees leading to the adoption of Commission Delegated Regulation ( EU) 2019/33 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/34. The EU believes that its internal legislation offers a meaningful and transparent system of protection to traditional terms used on wine products from the EU, as well as on products from thir d countries. The EU has demonstrated its ability to address specific Members' concerns in this area either via its internal legislation or via bilateral agreements. 2.1.3.35 China - Regulations for the Supervision and Administration of Medical Devices (Order No. 65 0 of the State Council), G/TBT/N/CHN/1313 (ID 42879) 2.305. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. The Republic of Korea recognizes China's efforts to ensure safety and effectiveness of medical devices and to strengthen quality control by revising the Regulations for the Supervision and Administration of Medical Device s. Korea however notes that the definition of "qualified testing laboratories" still remains unclear in the revised regulations published on 1 June 2021. As to our previous enquiry asking about the scope of "qualified testing laboratories", China responded in the latest meeting with Korea that operational rules are being drafted for the regulations and that China would notify Korea at the completion of the rules. However, as Korea has yet to hear from China, Korea requests China to share the current status of development of the operational rules. Also, if internationally accredited laboratories are included in the scope of qualified testing laboratories, it will greatly save time and costs incurred from unnecessary duplicate testing, which is currently requi red for exporters to be 79 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 428 . G/TBT/M/85 - 83 - authorized or registered in China. Moreover, China will benefit from timely distribution of quality medical devices, thereby promoting public health. 2.306. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. The new revision of the regulation on the supervision and administration of medical devices has been released, and took effect on 1 June 2021. The new regulation reasonably sets clinical evaluation requirements, simplifies the review procedures, and further encou rages the innovation. Meanwhile, the regulation fully implements the system of registrant, strengthens the responsibility of enterprises and supervision over the whole process of medical devices. 2.1.3.36 China - Registration Fees for Drugs and Medical Device Produ cts (ID 46680) 2.307. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. As in the previous TBT meetings, the Republic of Korea would like to raise this STC regarding China's Registration Fees for Drugs and Medical Device Products. Chin a's imposition of registration fees for medical devices continues to remain an issue of concern for Korea. Korea expressed, during the last meeting, its concern over the discrepancy in fees between domestic producers and importers, requesting China to ensu re fair and equitable treatment in charging the registration fees. However, China only responded that in the case of medicines, its registration fees are similar to or lower than the fees charged by other Member countries, and failed to give any remarks on medical device registration fees. As it is deemed inappropriate to impose twice more registration fees on importers compared to domestic manufacturers, Korea would like to once again request imposing the same amount of registration fees both on domestic a nd foreign manufacturers. 2.308. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. Charging registration fees for drugs and medical devices are common international practices. For example, in 2013 the new medicine registration fees of Mem bers were largely around 1 million Yuan, in some Members even above 10 million Yuan, while it was only 35,000 Yuan in China. Afterwards, it is adjusted to 0.624 million Yuan in China, which is still much lower than the average international level. The fees are mainly determined by the cost of the conformity assessment works. The minor difference of the registration fees is due to different workloads and price levels. 2.1.3.37 Russian Federation - Rules of cement certification, G/TBT/N/RUS/48, G/TBT/N/RUS/49 (ID 49781) 2.309. The representative of the European Union provided t he following statement. The EU would like to refer to its previous statements in the TBT Committee on this issue. We would also like to thank the Russian Federation for a bilateral meeting that took place on the margins of this Committee. The EU would like to recall that its comments on both Russian notifications G/TBT/N/RUS/48 and G/TBT/N/RUS/49 sent to the Russian Federation in May and June 2016 were never replied to, despite our numerous reminders. The EU deeply regrets that Russia continues to adopt restricting measures in the area of cement certification th at are disproportionate, unjustified and not notified to the WTO before their entry into force. Further to this, the EU regrets that Russia is not willing to provide any information on the state of play of the preparation of the new standard for cement. Th e EU would like to ask the Russian Federation to explain the impact of the new Rules on Conformity Assessment, adopted on 24 July 2021, on the certification rules for cement and the GOST standard 56836 of 2016. The new Rules on Conformity Assessment (Gover nment resolution No. 1265 of 24 July 2021) provide certain facilitation of conformity assessment procedures for foreign manufacturers. However, the main concern of EU cement exporters to the Russian Federation, regarding the inspection controls of certifie d products, remains unresolved. 2.310. Chapter XIV, article 60 of the new Rules clearly provides that inspection control of certified products must be carried out according the National standards: "60. Inspection controls of certified products is carried out in a ccordance with the national standard of the Russian Federation GOST R 58984 -2020 'Conformity assessment. Procedure for inspection control in certification procedures', unless otherwise established by the documents on standardization provided for in the Ann ex to these Rules." As regards cement, Annex of the Rules refers to the National standard GOST R 56836 -2016 "Conformity Assessment. Rules for Certification of Cement", which is the same National standard, which effectively restricted EU cement exports to R ussia since 2016. This means that despite the 80 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 466 . 81 For previous statements follow the thread u nder ID 497 . G/TBT/M/85 - 84 - adoption of new Rules on Conformity Assessment, every shipment of cement going to Russia still has to be sampled and tested at the border. According to EU companies, this implies a cost of around €1500 for each shipment, as well as a delay of 28 days (with railway transport costs of such delay at €210/tonne), which makes export of cement to Russia practically impossible. In EU's view, paragraph 8.2. of previously notified GOST Standard establishes a clear discri mination of imported cement by introducing additional inspection control for each cement shipment, arriving from third (non-EU) country, despite products being already certified. The EU regrets to note that the new Rules on Conformity Assessment did not re ctify the discriminatory treatment regarding cement certification and inspections. The EU would like to ask the Russian Federation to provide information about the new Rules on Conformity Assessment and about the preparation of previously announced new sta ndard for cement, as well as to share the planned timing for its TBT notification. 2.311. In response, the representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement. The Russian Federation reiterates that GOST R on rules of cement certification was developed to ensure safety and quality of products marketed in Russia. We note that certain provisions of this standard are under review. No timeline for this process can be provided now. As regards to the new Rules on Conformity Assessment, mentioned by the EU, we note that these rules lay down general standard procedures for conformity assessment in respect of all products subject to these procedures. 2.1.3.38 India - Draft Food Safety and Standards (Alcoholic Beverages Standards) Regulations, 2015, G/TBT/N/IND/51, G/TBT/N/IND/104 (ID 49482) 2.312. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to reiterate some remaining concerns regarding this measure. We took note of the new amendment regarding alcoholic beverages that was published on 18 December 2020 and is applied as from 1 July 2021. Several of our concerns for wine have been taken into account and an alignment to OIV standards took place for large parts. This is a big step in the right direction. There remain however some issues, described in EU comments on notification G/TBT/N/IND/104 , for which we would welcome a reply. We request Indian authorities to consider alignment with OIV standards. Moreover, we would appreciate if India could take into account the following: The lack of stock - exhaustion clause (to allow the sale of products already present on the Indian market until stocks are exhausted in order to minimize the impact for economic operators) and transition period. The presence of some technical specifications (the maximum alcohol content, some spirits definitions) that may not be in line with international widely accepted practices and could result in an adverse impact for international trade. Concerning the use of coloran ts in combination, we received information that an internal FSSAI meeting took place recently in order to review the situation. It seems that the use of colorants in combination has been allowed under certain conditions. We would like to get clarification as to what exactly has been agreed and when it will be made public. We hope that we can continue our discussion and find an acceptable solution to the outstanding issues. In this context, we request FSSAI to consider extending the implementation period up to the next excise year, i.e. July 2022. 2.313. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. The majority of the standards prescribed in the FSSAI Alcoholic Beverages Regulations, 2018, have been aligned with OIV in line with WTO com mitments. In addition to this, alignment of the analysis methods of alcoholic beverages with the OIV is under process. FSSAI via direction dated 22 June 2020 operationalized the use of food colours "Tartrazine, Carmoisine, Brilliant Blue, Sunset Yellow and Ponceau 4R" in the food category 14.2.6 -Distilled Spirituous Beverages. Further, via direction dated 7 December 2020, revised provisions for using these colours, and one additional colour, Allura Red, was operationalized for use in food category 14.2.6 -Distilled Spirituous Beverages. Further, as per appendix A, the colour, namely caramel, beta carotene and grape skin extract, are allowed in aromatized alcoholic beverages. 2.1.3.39 Egypt - Manufacturer Registration System (Decree No. 43/2016 and Decree No. 992/2015) , G/TBT/N/EGY/114, G/TBT/N/EGY/115 (ID 50583) 2.314. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to reiterate its concerns with regard to the registration of companies exporting to Egypt under 82 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 494 . 83 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 505 . G/TBT/M/85 - 85 - Decrees No. 991/2015, No. 43/2016 and No. 44/2019. This registration pr ocedure constitutes a considerable obstacle to trade and imposes unnecessary administrative burden and blocks or substantially delays EU exports. We therefore continue to question the measure and Egypt's justification for this mandatory registration of EU companies. We note with concern that the pending registration cases known to the EU have still not been successfully processed and that some sectors (like ceramic tiles) continue being disproportionately affected by the discretionary application of Decree 43. Moreover, we would like to highlight the structural problems related to the Decree 43/2016, like the lack of transparency of the registration process, lack of clear deadlines for processing the requests, lack of a clear appeal procedure, and a high lev el of discretion in granting registrations. We are ready to work with Egypt in order to terminate the measure. 2.315. The representative of Turkey provided the following statement. We join the European Union to emphasize our ongoing concerns on Egypt's Decree on manufacturer registration system. Turkey would like to thank Egypt for continuing constructive bilateral discussions on this issue. However, Turkey remains concerned on Egypt's Decrees on manufacturer registration system, since the structural problems rela ted to the Decree 43/2016 - such as the lack of transparency of the registration process and unclear deadlines for processing the requests - have been continuing. In addition, Turkey has additional concerns on the implementation of the registration system due to the new Decree of the Ministry of Trade and Industry of Egypt numbered 273 for the year 2021 that foresees the prohibition of the dismantled parts of the goods prescribed in the Decrees numbered 43/2016 and 44/2019. Besides, we have been informed at the latest CTG (Council for Trade in Goods) meeting that the Decree 273/2021 has been suspended by the said Ministry for a certain period of time and we welcomed the suspension decision of the Ministry. In this regard, Turkey would like to ask Egypt if su ch suspension has been announced publicly and in written form and if Egypt could share the relevant suspension announcement with us by providing justification behind the suspended Decree and information regarding the process to be followed after the suspen sion. In addition, we understand that Egypt did not notify the new Decree to the WTO. Therefore, we urge Egypt to notify the measure to the WTO, conduct a consultation process for at least 60 days following that notification, and take into account the comm ents before finalizing the measure. In conclusion, Turkey would like to invite Egypt to repeal the registration process with the objective of removing unnecessary barriers to trade and ensure not to implement the new Decree as a final measure considering t he principles and obligations under the WTO Agreements. 2.316. In response, the representative of Egypt provided the following statement. Egypt and the EU have engaged on this issue on numerous occasions and at various fora and in the context of these meetings an d exchanges Egypt has explained its understanding of the issues raised by the EU and explained that over 90% of the European companies have indeed been registered. Remaining companies are currently subject to consideration and we have exchanged with the EU the status of a number of companies. On the systemic issues raised by the EU and Turkey regarding transparency and the unclear deadline, and those related to the implementation of the registration system in Egypt, Egypt has indeed taken a number of positi ve steps in the right direction in this respect and will continue to work on the improvement of the system. I would like to note that on the website of the General Organization of Export and Import Control there is a list of companies that has been publish ed, explaining that those companies have been given a time period to renew their quality control certificates. Regarding Decree 273 for the year 2021, as has been explained, it has been suspended based on a number of studies of the potential impact of this decree on both the consumer and the industry, and it is currently under review. In case of any updates, it will be notified to the TBT Committee. 2.1.3.40 India - Mandatory Certification for Steel Products, G/TBT/N/IND/32, G/TBT/N/IND/32/Add.1, G/TBT/N/IND/32/Add.2 (ID 22484) 2.317. The representative of The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu provided the following statement. The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu would like to express its concerns about Steel and Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2020 issued by In dia's Ministry of Steel on stainless steel bars and flats (IS 6603:2001) and electrogalvanized hot rolled and cold reduced carbon steel sheets and strips (IS 17404:2020). Firstly, we would like to express our appreciation to the Bureau of Indian Standards for granting the approval to our enterprise's application for ISI Mark licence on Stainless Steel Bars and Flats in early October. It facilitates bilateral trade on Steel and Steel Products. Secondly, we would like to thank 84 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 224 . G/TBT/M/85 - 86 - India for postponing the enforce ment date for electrogalvanized hot rolled and cold reduced carbon steel sheets and strips (IS 17404:2020) until 21 September 2021. However, due to the persistent impact of COVID -19, most countries still impose international travel restrictions and nationa l quarantine policies. This situation continues to make on -site factory inspection difficult to conduct in practice. As a result, we would like to urge India to postpone the implementation of IS 17404:2020 once again. In addition, we strongly suggest that India consider other facilitative measures, such as allowing virtual inspections as a part of the certification process, or accepting conformity assessment results from testing laboratories and inspection bodies outside India, as alternatives. 2.318. The represen tative of Japan provided the following statement. First of all, Japan appreciates that India gave us the opportunity to discuss this issue bilaterally ahead of the Committee meeting. However, we believe that we still have some concerns and would like to ra ise those points. Japan again appreciates India's remarks at the last TBT Committee meeting regarding consideration for the introduction of virtual/remote inspection for BIS conformity assessment in the steel sector. We would like to know about the current status of the consideration and possible timeline for the introduction of such alternative inspection methods. In addition, approval procedure of BIS conformity assessment is still taking an excessively long period of time. We request that India accelerat e its examination procedure and shorten its examination period. Thirdly, we have heard that India still requests end -users to switch to local procurement or to submit future plans for domestic production in India instead of importing certain products, whic h is not related to the conformity assessment procedures. We again strongly request immediate removal of such inappropriate demands. Lastly, we welcome India's decision to postpone the enforcement of certain steel standards. We would like to request that I ndia take all stakeholder's opinions into consideration and flexibly postpone other standards in the steel sector. 2.319. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea would like to support the statements by Japan and Chinese Taipei. Regarding the mandatory certification for steel products of India, due to the delays in the certification process, a request was submitted asking India to postpone the enforcement of the mandatory standards until December 2021. But there has been no response to the request, nor any customs clearance. We hereby request India for alternative measures to remedy the certification process until the current situation improves, such as exemption from factory audit, substitution into paper -based audit, or speedy introduction of virtual/off -site inspection currently under review by the Indian Government. 2.320. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. EU would like to support the delegations of Chinese Taipei, Japan and Korea. Indi a has designed and introduced specific standards and certification requirements for a number of products across sectors that require on-site, in -person audits. The Quality Control Orders have protectionist orientation and are sending worrying signals to th e EU industry, EU investors and EU member States. Once the QCOs come into force they cause extra burden and economic cost to the EU industry that has to undergo cumbersome procedures to obtain necessary permission and/or licences for products already certi fied under established international standards. Additionally, the QCOs require physical audit by an auditor of the Bureau of Indian Standards in order for product manufacturers in third countries to receive the approval for exports to India. The ongoing CO VID-19 pandemic and the restrictions linked thereto have negative impact on the certification process in India especially for foreign companies with production facilities outside India. The EU would like to support the introduction of virtual remote inspec tions for BIS conformity assessment in the steel sector. Alternative inspection methods are crucial to maintain access to Indian markets. The steel and steel products Quality Control Order 2020 targets 145 products. The QCOs for the majority of these produ cts are already in force, however it remains unclear to the European Union which of QCOs for steel products are already in force. India defers from time to time the date of implementation of certain steel products. The EU would therefore appreciate it if I ndia could provide an updated list of steel and steel products for which the QCOs are already in force, together with the list of steel products for which the implementation of QCOs has been deferred. The EU would also like to know whether India plans to further expand the scope of the steel and steel products Quality Control Order of 2020. Finally, does India plan to accept steel and steel products produced in line with internationally accepted standards and limit the list of steel and steel products falli ng under these QCOs? 2.321. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. India has started granting licences to manufacturers whose audit was completed before the pandemic. If there are specific issues of concern, it is requested to share the details. As regards the auditing remotely, India is seized of the matter. There is no provision in BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, G/TBT/M/85 - 87 - 2018, to undertake virtual inspection or the use of recognised third -party certification of companies in the country of manufacturing to meet the QCO's in -person audit requirements for foreign manufacturing facilities. However, the Government of India is considering introducing relevant enabling provisions to undertake virtual/remote inspection for BIS conform ity assessment activities. G/TBT/N/IND/90 on 25 March 2019 is related to the Essential Requirement clause included in the QCO regarding "Stampings/laminations/cores of Transformers (with or without winding)" & "Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes." In this regard, it may be noted enforce ment date for "Stampings/laminations/cores of Transformers (with or without winding)" was extended from 30 June 2021 for another three months and is now in force from 1 October 2021 and "Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes" is under enforcement since 16 June 2 020. Regarding the implementation of IS 17404:2020 (Electrogalvanized hot rolled and cold reduced carbon steel sheets and strips), it may be noted that the date of enforcement was 22 June 2021. 2.1.3.41 China - Cybersecurity Law (ID 52685) 2.322. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan continues to have concerns regarding the China's "Cybersecurity Law" and would like to refer to the previous statement we made at the last TBT Committee in June 2021. Japan is concerned with related enforcement regulation as well. Japan would like to request that China provide notification of the enforcement regulations to the TBT Committee and consider comments from stakeholders. In addition, Japan would like to request that China provide adequate lead time from com pletion of these regulations until their enforcement, and to implement these measures in a transparent manner. 2.323. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States remains concerned about this measure and we refer bac k to our previous statements. 2.324. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to refer to its statements at previous TBT Committees with regard to the Cybersecurity Law, namely that the scope of the requirements is unclear as key terms have still not been specified in sufficient detail. The EU would like to request more clarity regarding several of the implementing measures of China's Cybersecurity Law. For example, the Cyberspace Administration of China's Cross -Border Data Transfer Measures continue to raise concerns about the broad scope of these regulations as to what is considered as critical information infrastructure and which kinds of cross - border data transfers are affected. The definition of critical info rmation infrastructure appears to cover many commercial activities and whole sectors that have no connection to national security. Additionally, the list of what is considered important data is open -ended and this has not been further clarified by the rele ased draft for the Data Security Law in July 2020. As a result of the data localization and security assessment requirements, foreign companies operating in China could find themselves in a less competitive situation compared to domestic operators. The EU calls on China to implement the provisions in a non -discriminatory manner, respecting the principles of proportionality, necessity and technology neutrality, and ensuring adequate protection of intellectual property (IP). Furthermore, the EU would like to repeat its previous requests for clarifications on the relationship with existing Multi -Level Protection Schemes and the expected implementation timeline. The EU requests that China notify draft measures concerning any sectoral implementation to the WTO in order to give adequate opportunity to Members and their stakeholders to comment on any subsequent developments. 2.325. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada continues to have significant concerns with China's suite of cybersecurit y and cryptography/encryption laws and related implementing regulations. This includes the Cybersecurity Law and the following measures that support it namely the Cybersecurity Review Measures, a new version of which was published for comment on 10 July 20 21 and, most recently, the Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Security Protection Regulations, a final version of which was released on 17 August 2021. Among other things, Canada continues to have concerns regarding the lack of precision regarding t he two implementing measures' scope and adherence to the principles of the TBT Agreement. Regarding the revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, Canada was pleased to provide written comments to China on 23 July, expressing our concerns. Regarding China's ne w CII Security Protection Regulations, they raise a number of issues and questions for Canada: While Canada appreciates the inclusion of a broad definition of CII, Canada believes it is an open -ended, imprecise list of sectors, which does not permit compan ies to assess adequately whether their infrastructure is CII. Will the 85 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 526 . G/TBT/M/85 - 88 - Public Security Department assist CII operators by consolidating and making publicly available the various security protection departments' determinations of what constitutes CII? 2.326. Canad a is also concerned terms used throughout the regulations could: (i) permit objectives other than legitimate national security goals; and (ii) result in uncertain IP protection. Examples of such terms can be found in the following provisions of the regulat ions: Article 4: The CII Operator's responsibility to "give full play to the role of the government and all aspects of society"; Article 11: The CII Operator's obligation to "timely report" any "major change" occurring to its CII; and Articles 39-40: legal liability when a CII operator "endangers cybersecurity or causes other consequences". China's CII Security Protection Regulations have been in effect since 1 September 2021, however, they were only published on 17 August 2021 and were never notified to th e WTO. This approximately 2-week period is much less than the 6 -month period understood to be a 'reasonable interval' between final publication and entry into force. In closing, Canada believes that both the Cybersecurity Review Measures and Critical Infor mation Infrastructure (CII) Security Protection Regulations raise a number of other ongoing concerns: the absence of defined criteria operators of CII is to use in assessing a security threat; and the lack of a clear commitment to national treatment, MFN t reatment or the use of international standards. 2.327. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia appreciates China's efforts to consult with interested parties on its measures relating to cybersecurity, including China's May 2021 public consultation process on its revised draft Data Security Law and revised draft Personal Information Protection Law. We were pleased to make submissions to the Chinese Government as part of these public consultations. We welcome a number of the revis ions to these laws but continue to encourage China to provide as much detail as possible, especially when it comes to issues such as the scope of the laws. Australia reiterates that, consistent with the TBT Agreement, we expect that measures will be implem ented in a non -discriminatory manner and in a way that is no more trade restrictive than necessary. Australia further urges China to consider less trade - restrictive measures that are reasonably available to achieve its objectives. 2.328. In response, the represen tative of China provided the following statement. The Cybersecurity Law has been implemented since 1 June 2017. It is a basic, framework and comprehensive law in the field of cybersecurity in China. It clarifies the responsibilities and obligations of gove rnment authorities at all levels and related departments, network providers, users, etc. Since its implementation, it has played an important role in safeguarding the national cybersecurity. The purpose of enacting and implementing the cybersecurity law is to safeguard the national cyberspace sovereignty, national security, social and public interests, and to protect the rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations. 2.1.3.42 China - Encryption Law of the People's Republic of China by the O ffice of State Commercial Cryptography Administration (OSCCA) (ID 53486) 2.329. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. We still remain concerned about this measure and we are referring back to our statements. 2.330. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan continues to have concerns regarding the China's "Encryption Law" that entered into force on 1 January 2020 and would like to refer to the previous statement we made at the last TBT Committee in June 2021. Japan would like to request that China's regulation not hamper foreign companies' activities or market access to China. 2.331. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to reiterate its concern relating to the Cr yptography Law that came into force on 1 January 2020. The EU remains concerned about the wide scope of the law, in conjunction with the lack of clarity of a number of foundational concepts as well as the administrative procedures described in the text. These factors will negatively impact business confidence. The EU also notes with concern that the new law does not recognize China's previous commitment made in 2000 that the cryptography - related regulation would only apply to products whose core function is that of providing encryption – the so -called "Year 2000 Clarification" by the State Cryptography Administration (SCA). The EU calls on China to ensure that legal and regulatory requirements are based on a non -discriminatory basis, do not favour specific t echnologies, do not limit market access and do not lead to a forced 86 For previous stateme nts follow the thread under ID 534 . G/TBT/M/85 - 89 - transfer of intellectual property. The EU urges China to guarantee the possibility for foreign invested enterprises (FIEs) to participate on an equal footing with domestic companies in the production, research, development and sale of cryptography products on its market. 2.332. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. The Law on Cryptography of China took effect on 1 January 2020. The Law clearly stipulates that g overnments at all levels and relevant departments shall follow the principle of non -discrimination, and treat all parties equally including foreign -invested enterprises that engage in commercial cryptography research, production, sales, service, import, ex port, etc. China encourages voluntary technical cooperation in commercial cryptography based on commercial rules in the process of foreign investment. Administrative agencies and their staff are prohibited to force transfer of commercial cryptography techn ology by means of administrative measures. 2.1.3.43 European Union - Organic production and labelling - Maté (erva -mate), G/TBT/N/EU/738 (ID 52487) 2.333. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil regrets having to raise STC 524 after being consistently reassured by the E U that Regulation (EU) 2018/848 would come to force on 1 January 2021. Brazil had raised this STC for the last time in the TBT meeting of November 2019, in which the European Union stressed that erva -mate was not within the scope of the current organic Reg ulation (Regulation (EC) 834/2007) and there was no possibility to modify this. However, the EU noted that, as proposed by the European Commission, the new Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production and labelling adopted on 30 May 2018 by the European Parliament and the Council included Maté under its scope. In September 2020, the EU notified a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production as regards its date of applicatio n and certain other dates (G/TBT/N/EU/738). Following its adoption, instead of entering into force on 1 January 2021, Regulation (EU) 2018/848 will now enter into application on 1 January 2022. The postponement of the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 20 18/848 shows the EU's disregard towards the matters presented by Brazil under this long - standing STC. As we have stated in previous meetings, not including erva -mate in the organic product list without any technical or scientific justification was discrimi natory and more trade - restrictive than necessary, and thus inconsistent with the TBT Agreement. Until January 2022, provided that no further postponements will be enacted, Brazilian producers will be denied access to EU markets on an equitable basis, and t heir losses are not expected to meet any sort of compensation. 2.334. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union has replied to Brazil on this issue in previous TBT Committee meetings, as well as bilaterally. The new Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production and labelling adopted on 30 May 2018 by the European Parliament and the Council includes Erva Mate under its scope. The Regulation was due to enter into application on 1 January 2021. Neverth eless, following the on - going COVID -19 crisis, the organic sector needed additional time to adapt to the new rules on production, controls and trade. The EU notified to the TBT Committee a draft Regulation postponing the entry into application of the organ ics Regulation by one year (G/TBT/N/EU/738). Regulation (EU) No 2020/1693 of 11 November 2020 amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 on organic production and labelling of organic products as regards its date of application and certain other dates and was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 13 November 2020.88 Therefore, new organic rules will enter into application on 1 January 2022. From this date, erva -mate will be included in the scope of Regulation (EU) 2018/848, as it is listed in it s Annex I. 2.1.3.44 Russian Federation - Federal law No 487 -FZ, providing a framework for comprehensive use of special labelling and traceability of goods and Decision No. 792 -r specifying the goods to which labelling will apply and the dates of introduction of the mandatory labelling (ID 56789) 2.335. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. On 28 April 2018 the Russian Government adopted decision No. 792 -R, listing goods which will be subject to mandatory marking. The EU has very serious concerns on the proportionality of the measure: 87 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 524 . 88 OJ L 381, 13.11.2020, p.1. 89 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 567 . G/TBT/M/85 - 90 - individual labelling and registration creates significant burden and cost, well beyond the cost of the individual labels. This may be justified for some products of high value and with a high record of count erfeit or tax evasion, such as tobacco products or furs. Therefore the EU requests that Russia reviews the scope of products covered by the measure so that this focuses on high -value products for which there is evidence of a high level of counterfeit and/o r tax avoidance. Though we commend the Russian government in its efforts to tackle counterfeiting, this measure includes technical regulations and will have a significant impact on imports from the EU and from other WTO Members to Russia. According to the Decision of 1995 of the TBT Committee, "Members are obliged to notify all mandatory labelling requirements that are not based substantially on a relevant international standard and that may have a significant effect on the trade of other Members". Therefor e, this measure should have been notified under the TBT Agreement before its adoption. The Russian government adopted Resolution No 515 on 26 April 2019 on the "marking of goods subject to mandatory labelling by means of identification". This measure also falls within the scope of the TBT Agreement and needs to be notified to the WTO. 2.336. Several categories of products have been covered so far. We would be interested to get confirmation as to what the next categories of products will be. The scheme will soon ha ve been in operation for over a year for certain categories of goods. The EU therefore wishes to enquire whether a regulatory evaluation is planned which weighs costs versus benefits of the implementation of the scheme so far. In accordance with good regul atory practice, such evaluation is unavoidable before consideration of a possible extension of the labelling and tracing requirements to further categories of goods. We ask the Russian Federation to take into consideration the European Union's comments to ensure that the implementation of this measure is not unnecessarily trade -restrictive, in accordance with the WTO TBT Agreement. 2.337. In response, the representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement. Russia previously explained its pos ition on this issue in this Committee and in the Council for Trade in Goods. The position holds. The objective of the Track and Trace System is to fight against illicit trade and to ensure that taxes due are paid. The system is needed for law enforcement. No law - abiding company can compete with the one that is not paying taxes due. In this sense, the T&T system is levelling the playing field and lawful companies benefit from it. The concept of the system in respect of each product category is developed toge ther with the companies involved in manufacturing, imports and distribution of the respective products. The business community is extensively consulted before the approval of the system for each product. Mandatory implementation of the system for each prod uct category is preceded by voluntary experiment with importers, manufacturers and representatives of foreign stakeholders in order to ensure system performance and adjust it to specificities of production and distribution process of each product. Above -mentioned steps enable interested companies to shape new requirements as well as to prepare to them beforehand. 2.1.3.45 European Union - Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR), G/TBT/N/EU/71/Add.1, G/TBT/N/EU/72/Add.1 G/TBT/N/EU/845 (ID 59490) 2.338. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. As we have long noted, the United States supports the development and enforcement of a well -defined medical device regulatory system that assures the safety and performance of medical devices, especially now given the global health crisis we are facing. The one -year delay in implementation of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) to May 2021, provided some necessary relief. Additionally, we appreciate and support the continued utilization of remote audits to alleviate the assessment backlog and ultimately ensure patients' continued access to much needed medical devices and in vitro diagnostic tools. The US has previously expressed concerns regarding implementation of the in vitro diagnostics regulation (IVDR), and the continued access of US firms to the EU market. In particular, we are concerned about the number of Notified Bodies (NBs) approved to assess conformity to the IVDR, with only six such NBs approved as of October 2021. However, we note the recent notification by the EU to the TBT Committee proposing a delay in the implementation of IVDR. We appreciate the recognition of the challenges around building adequate certification capacity under the legislation's timeline. We are still studying the proposed timeline a nd scope of products covered under the new notification, and we understand that the delayed implementation provides for a staggered extension based on the class of IVDR. Can you please provide a brief explanation of the new proposed timelines? We 90 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 594 . G/TBT/M/85 - 91 - hope the Commission will continue to work with the United States as well as stakeholders to address any future challenges with IVDR implementation to avoid unintended adverse effects on patients. 2.339. We understand that the Commission intends to create harmonized European standards to demonstrate compliance with EU legislation rather than use existing international standards. We urge the Commission to use internationally recognized standards where possible to avoid duplicative efforts and additional burd ens on manufacturers to comply with separate harmonized standards - one for the EU and others for other international regulatory authorities. We note that in preparation for the implementation of the MDR, the Commission announced in January 2020 that a new nomenclature system, the European Medical Device Nomenclature (EMDN) system would be created to be the basis of the European Database on Medical Devices (EUDAMED). EUDAMED will include a Unique Device Identifier (UDI) module. The EMDN is based on the CND (Classificazione nazionale e internazionali), which is not harmonized with the well -established Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN).91 The United States uses the GMDN as the basis for our Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID). GMDN was developed with the support of ISO and the then Global Harmonization Task Force (now the International Medical Device Regulators Forum) and is widely adopted by the medical device industry and used by over 70 national medical device regulators to support t heir activity. 2.340. We are concerned that the Commission's selection of EMDN will undermine the interoperability of the two UDI systems (EUDAMED and GUDID) for tracking and reporting purposes and will pose several significant obstacles to the medical device and healthcare community. Furthermore, the Commission has not addressed interoperability concerns, and has not made any progress on mapping EMDN to GMDN so as to harmonize the UDI systems and reduce duplication for industry. An additional consequence of the C ommission's adoption of EMDN is that it has encouraged other regulators and entities, like the World Health Organization, to adopt EMDN, creating duplicative requirements for the medical device industry, and thus possibly harming public safety. The EU has repeatedly stated in bilateral discussions and in published documents that it intends to map its nomenclature system to GMDN, but we have yet to see any action by the EU that demonstrates an attempt to map to GMDN. In fact, the EU recently published its Eu ropean Medical Device Nomenclature for public consultation which does not propose any steps toward mapping to GMDN. Could the EU explain what actions it is taking to map EMDN to GMDN? 2.341. The representative of Japan provided the following statement. 1. We appr eciate the June update of the MDCG guidance publication plan. We request that public consultation be carried out prior to the publication of the MDCG guidance, and that the guidance that is published be made mandatory with a transition period. The mapping plan for EMDN (European Medical Device Nomenclature) and GMDN (Global Medical Device Nomenclature) mentioned in the MDCG guidance publication plan is still N/A (Not Applicable). We request that a publication schedule be set and that they be published as pl anned. Post -marketing surveillance and vigilance are required by the MDR. Though the plan for publication of guidance on post -market surveillance and vigilance has been described, we request that it be published promptly. 2. In June, we stated that we had received reports from many companies undergoing technical document review that there had been no progress since the start of the review, which was in all cases a lengthy period, and that it was not foreseeable that the review would be completed and certifi cates issued by the date of application of the MDR. Many companies also reported that despite more than one year having passed since the start of the technical document review, it remained incomplete and we also requested an investigation into the cause of the delay and an explanation of the measures undertaken to improve the situation. However, there has been no improvement. We would like the regulatory authority to continue to investigate the cause and take measures for improvement. 2.342. 3. In June, we stated that the MDR requires strict clinical evaluation of Class I, IIa and IIb medical devices. In order to prevent the MDR from becoming more trade -restrictive than necessary, we requested that you consider simplifying the clinical evaluation requirements for C lass I, IIa, and IIb medical devices in the same way as Japan's premarket certificate or the U.S. 510(k) regulations. We request that you continue to consider this matter. 4. We welcome that the European Commission has proposed a Regulation amending the tr ansition period for the IVD Regulation on 14 October 91 The European Commission announced its decision to adopt CND via guidance: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/md_topics - interest/docs/md_emdn_eudamed_nomenclature_en.pdf G/TBT/M/85 - 92 - 2021. We deeply appreciate that such a proposal to extend the transition period for three to five years depending on risk classifications of products needed to be certified by notified bodies. We are confident that this proposal would eliminate our grave concern that many of the IVD devices placed on the market would not be certified by the end of the transition period due to a lack of capacity to address the issue on the part of the notified bodies. Mean while, since only one guidance document on IVD has been issued since June 2021, we would again request prompt issuance of the guidance documents and provision of a timeline for their issuance as early as possible, as was requested in the previous (WTO/TBT) meeting. 5. As for the harmonized standards of European regulations, despite the publication plan not being disclosed in the EU Official Journal, they were suddenly promulgated. Therefore, Japanese companies need to hastily develop a conformity plan and t ake action after the harmonized standards are promulgated. We request the release of the plan for the development and publication of harmonized standards for MDR and IVDR. 2.343. The representative of China provided the following statement. China thanks the EU fo r the new notification, but still remain concerned about the IVDR. We are looking forward to the consideration of and reply to our following suggestions. 1. It is recommended that the new proposal to extend the IVDR transitional period could enter into for ce and the legislative process could issue without delay. 2. It is recommended to announce the laboratory authorization and preparation. According to the classification requirements of the IVDR regulation, in addition to applying for a CE certificate for e xporting high -risk products to the EU, an authorized laboratory is also required for inspection. Therefore, manufacturers need to consider the allocation of laboratory resources in advance while applying for product certification. However, the EU has not a nnounced the laboratories that have been authorized. In addition, the certification of high -risk products takes a relatively long time, and manufacturers cannot choose the suitable laboratory configuration and optimize them, which will increase the difficu lty of certification. 3. It is recommended to introduce guidelines under the IVDR regulations. For example: 1) The In Vitro diagnostic code and classification guidelines for enterprises to conduct classification sampling and determine the number accordingl y. 2) Technical guidelines under IVDR regulation, such as detailed technical guidelines of clinical performance evaluation, performance analysis of special products, certification of systems and supporting consumables, etc. 3) Detailed guidelines on how mo difications are determined. 2.344. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada again wishes to echo the points raised by other Members regarding the implementation of this measure. We remain concerned that the number of notified bodies still appears to be insufficient to carry out the certification and approval activities provided for in the regulations. Canada supports the standardization of international medical devices classification and nomenclature. However, we are concerned that the European Union's new European Medical Device Nomenclature (EMDN) is not harmonized to the established Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) that is currently used by several major regulatory authorities. We are also concerned this new EMDN wou ld not be appropriate as a source for the WHO's International Classification, Coding and Nomenclature (INMD). Canada has concerns with the limited transparency and involvement of regulators, medical device manufacturers and industry stakeholders in the com parative analysis and the impacts of a new nomenclature, including any technical barriers to trade. Canada would like to also highlight the relatively low usage of EMDN globally, and reiterates Health Canada's continued position that the WHO's proposal to select EMDN as a global medical device nomenclature system is premature and, at a minimum, would need to be accompanied by a mapping exercise to support member States currently using other nomenclature systems. Canada would like to raise awareness of the r isks of incidentally causing complexities, costs and confusion in the medical device technology and healthcare sectors due to the creation of an additional and duplicative system. 2.345. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The MDR officially entered into application on 26 May 2021. This new Regulation significantly improves and upgrades the regulatory system for medical devices, replacing the former two Directives. It is important to underline that the shift betw een the Directives to the MDR is a gradual one, facilitated by a grace mechanism, which is similar but more stringent approach than grandfathering. This mechanism allows that products in compliance with the Directives may continue to be in circulation unti l May 2025. As regards the IVDR, the Commission has been closely assessing the situation on the ground. It has become apparent that, due to the additional resources required to address the COVID -19 pandemic, national authorities, health institutions, Notif ied Bodies and economic operators will not be in a position to ensure the proper implementation and application of the Regulation from the date of application. With only six Notified Bodies designated so far, there is a grave shortage of capacity, making i t impossible for manufacturers to conduct the legally required G/TBT/M/85 - 93 - conformity assessment procedures in time. In addition, due to COVID -19 travel restrictions, Notified Bodies were not able to carry out the required on -site audits of manufacturers' premises to verify the manufacturing and other relevant processes. This risks significant disruption in the supply of a multitude of in vitro diagnostic medical devices (e.g. HIV tests, pregnancy tests or SARS -CoV-2 tests) on the European Union market. 2.346. As such, a dra ft measure proposing a staggered set of transition periods for devices that are required to undergo conformity assessment procedures involving a Notified Body has been submitted to the Committee on TBT. The length of the transition periods depends on the r isk class of devices, with shorter transition periods for higher risk devices and longer periods for lower risk ones. In addition, the notified draft proposes a deferred application of the requirements for "in -house devices", i.e. those made and used withi n the same health institution. Currently, we have 23 MDR designated Notified Bodies and 6 Notified Bodies under the IVDR, with more following in the pipeline. In addition, and pursuant to a January 2021 Commission Notice on audits and surveillance assessme nts under the MDR and IVDR, there is some more flexibility for member States to allow remote audits carried out by Notified Bodies, if the conditions set out within the Notice are met. Of the Notified Bodies that also have a Medical Device Single Audit Pro gram (MDSAP) designated auditing organization, 11 out of 13 have been designated so far under the MDR. These organizations cover some of the EU's trade partners such Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan and the US. It is important to underline that the EU does not expect to maintain the same number of Notified Bodies as currently existing under the Directives. Therefore, under the MDR/IVDR, the numbers will go down. Quantity is not and never has been an indication of capacity. As with anything related to demand and supply, the market will adjust and has in fact already done so, as the 29 Notified Bodies already designated under the Regulations reportedly hold more than a significant share of the market and have, in addition, considerably up -scaled their capacity . 2.347. As regards implementation work, the Commission and member States are continuing work on implementing acts and guidelines. To date, there have been above 70 published guidance documents, including several key guidance on clinical requirements. On standard ization, we are happy to report significant progress, with the first publications in the OJEU of references of harmonized standards under the new Regulations in July 2021. New publications are currently underway and should take place by the end of 2021. Fu rthermore, the expert panels, who have a role in the conformity assessment procedures of certain high -risk products, are officially running and processing applications. Very recently, the IVD panel was launched and is now operational. In addition, the regi stration module of the EUDAMED database was made available on December 2020 and the Unique Device Identification (UDI) registration module went live in September 2021. The remaining three EUDAMED modules will be made available once the system is fully func tional. As regards the UDI, allow us to underline the fundamental difference between the Unique Device Identification and the Nomenclature, which are two topics that seem to be confused in high -level discussions. While the UDI system employed in the EU is based on internationally agreed upon principles, the Nomenclature, also known as the language of use, will be different. This was a decision taken after careful assessment and consideration. The EU would like to stress, once again, that the EU's choice for creating the European Medical Device Nomenclature was founded on the need for a sensibly structured nomenclature that is transparent, open, completely publicly accessible and downloadable for free. There are currently no other nomenclature systems offerin g those characteristics. It is important to clarify that the choice of this nomenclature does not constitute a barrier and to avoid misinformation and confusion in this respect. The EU is fully committed to ensuring that the new system provides a higher le vel of patient protection and counts on trade partners to encourage their manufacturers to meet these new requirements to ensure trade continuity. 2.1.3.46 Qatar - Ministry of Public Health Circular regarding shelf life for cheese (ID 60292) 2.348. The representative of t he European Union provided the following statement. European Union would like to refer again to the Qatar's Ministry of Public Health Circular of 30 May 2019 establishing new import requirements for UHT milk and white cheese that entered into force the fol lowing day, on 1 June 2019. More recently, Qatar's Council of Ministers instructions were issued on 22 August 2021 affecting imports of dairy products. These instructions expanded further the scope of dairy products covered under the Circular of 2019 and t he trade -restrictive measures cover now nearly all 92 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 602. G/TBT/M/85 - 94 - dairy products. The EU regrets that Qatar did not notify any of these measures to the WTO, under neither the TBT nor the SPS Agreements. The EU would like to recall that the measure of 2019 is now in place for over two years without any clarity provided by Qatar on when this measure will be lifted. Furthermore, the new measures issued since August 2021 create additional barriers to a wider range of dairy products impacting thus even more negatively on EU ex ported dairy products to Qatar. Therefore, the implementation of these rules is considered more trade disruptive than necessary, as compliance with these requirements is not feasible for a wide range of cheeses and milk products exported from the EU to Qat ar. 2.349. The EU is particularly concerned about the stringent restrictions on the shelf life that disadvantage imported products in comparison to local products, but also about certain product characteristics for milk products and cheeses, in particular the obl igatory addition of vitamins to milk and low -fat-only requirements for certain cheeses. These requirements are not in line with Codex Alimentarius relevant international standards, are not science -based and are not required to guarantee the safety of impor ted products. The measures therefore appear to be more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil the legitimate objective of public health protection. In this context, the EU would like to refer to Articles 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4 of the TBT Agreement. The EU ur ges Qatar to suspend the application of both measures without further delay, align it to the WTO rules and comply with its notification obligations. The EU would like to thank Qatar for bilateral exchanges during the past months, which unfortunately have n ot yet resulted in an effective solution. The EU is prepared to continue work constructively with Qatar to resolve this important issue. 2.350. The representative of Qatar did not provide a response to the concerns raised. A technical statement was circulated fol lowing the meeting.93 2.1.3.47 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - Saber Conformity Assessment Online Platform / Saleem Product Safety Program (ID 61594) 2.351. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The implementation of the electronic certifica tion system SALEEM through the web -portal SABER remains a concern for the European Union. While we would like to thank the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for engaging constructively in bilateral talks, the difficulties still have a major negative impact on the imports of several products from the European Union to Saudi Arabia. The sector of toys is particularly affected, but the system is being gradually extended to other products. While the conformity assessment requirements differ depending on the sector, sever al EU industries coincide in reporting their overly costly, burdensome and time -consuming nature. EU toy manufacturers continue to report difficulties related to obtaining a GCC Conformity Tracking Symbol (so -called GCTS) from notified bodies authorized by Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organisation (SASO). As mentioned in previous statements, to which we refer for details, the European Union would like to recall the main concerns related to the following issues: request for test reports; selection of representative item; and product imported without GCTS. In addition, we would be interested in having an update on possible revisions of existing guidance on the process of obtaining the GCTS. In conclusion, the European Union would like to invite the K ingdom of Saudi Arabia to ensure efficient and less costly procedures for all products including the new conformity assessment system. The European Union remains available to continue our bilateral discussion. 2.352. The representative of Switzerland provided th e following statement. Switzerland remains concerned over the negative impact of the "Saber Conformity Assessment Online Platform" on bilateral trade with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We would like to support the intervention made by the EU on this matter. The registration and certification process remains costly, complex and time - consuming for our exporters. The industry continues to report that recognized bodies require disproportionate fees when carrying out conformity assessment procedures. Depending on the sector, strict conformity assessment procedures apply for products considered in their majority to be low -risk products. Furthermore, additional third -party certification and registration is required for the same low -risk products that already have be en certified and registered in the system. In particular for companies exporting quality products in small quantities, the registration and certification process leads to disproportionate costs and documentation requirements which is prohibitive to enter t he market. Switzerland would appreciate if the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia could ensure that the registration and certification process is not more strict than necessary to give 93 G/TBT/W/760 . 94 For previou s statements follow the thread under ID 615 . G/TBT/M/85 - 95 - adequate confidence that products fulfil the applicable requirements. Furthermore, we encourage the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to base the documentation and certification requirements on international standards, to implement clear and transparent guidelines and to ensure that the requirements are applied in an equal and uniform manner. 2.353. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States supports the concerns of the EU and Switzerland on this matter and will be submitting a statement that we made in the Council on Trade in Goods.95 We appreciate the bi lateral coordination we have had with Saudi Arabia this week. 2.354. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada would like to express its support for Saudi Arabia's goal of creating integrated systems that efficiently assess the safety of imported products. However, Canada is concerned by difficulties related to the implementation of the SALEEM electronic certification system through the Saber web -portal, which we believe has some overly costly, burdensome, time -consuming and unnecessary characteristics. Our industry stakeholders report that the Notified Conformity Assessment Bodies, certified by the Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization (SASO), have applied requirements for the provision of product samples inconsistently. I n some cases, physical samples of all products in a group to be tested must be supplied, while in others only a representative sample from a group is needed. Furthermore, industry stakeholders report that Notified Bodies are charging companies to select th e representative items. We understand that Notified Bodies have also often required importers to provide redundant information, such as additional photos of already certified products, which is increasing time and bureaucratic burdens unnecessarily. We see k Saudi Arabia's consideration of providing more detailed guidance to Notified Bodies on how to implement the Saber platform in order to increase the efficiency of the system, reduce compliance costs and ensure consistency. 2.355. In response, the representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statement. SALEEM programme works through the development of an integrated system of regulations and standards that conform to internationally recognized professional practices by developing a highly ef ficient system for measuring product safety indicators in the market through mechanisms and procedures that comply with the technical regulations of each product, especially essential requirements for health of human and animals, environment protection, an d to ensure the effectiveness of the services provided by legislative and regulatory bodies to achieve safety by conformity of those products to SASO Standards. Within this framework, SASO develops conformity assessment activities (certification, audit, in spection, and testing activities) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to be one of the tributaries that raise the level of quality in the national industry and the safety of imported goods presented in the Saudi market. By accepting the conformity assessment bodies in the various conformity assessment activities, this process aims to ensure the efficiency of the outputs of the accepted conformity assessment bodies operating in the conformity verification activities within the systems and requirements of the tech nical regulations approved to provide the necessary activities according to the scopes of acceptance of these bodies. 2.356. Therefore, SASO chose to engage a notified third party responsible for granting conformity certificates in accordance with the internation al standard ISO/IEC 17067 as part of the Kingdom pre - market approach. The main purpose of SABER is to improve the import experience and obtain the certificates of Conformity and shipment by using one platform integrated with other entities. SABER has reduc ed the time to 1 -7 working days compared to 7 -15 working days previously. In addition, SABER is linked directly to Saudi customs, which allows product clearance within 24 hours. Moreover, SABER is implementing UX design project to improve the experience fo r the importer in registering their product and applying for their required certifications. SABER has added bulk adding for products and bulk applying for the COC and continue its plan to improve the user experience in SABER. In terms of GSO toy regulation , GCTS tracking symbol must be issued through GSO platform. Once the GCTS is obtained, the shipment certificates can be easily issued through SABER platform. Please note that Saudi Customs is the entity responsible for the HS -code, and all HS -codes can be found on their website. Therefore, we recommend viewing their website to find the right HS -code that matches the product description. In addition, to find the requirement for each HS -code we advise to visit the website ( https://SABER.sa/home/hscodes ); worth mentioning that users of this website can search by using the first 6 digits since it matches the international HS -code. 95 G/TBT/W/762 . G/TBT/M/85 - 96 - 2.1.3.48 Mexico - Draft Amendment to Mexican Official Standard NOM -051-SCFI/SSA1 - 2010: General specifications for the labelling of pre -packed food and non -alcoholic beverages (ID 60896) 2.357. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement. Costa Rica maintains its trade concern regarding Mexico's proposed front -of-pack nutrition labelli ng for food products. In recent years, Costa Rica has very much believed in, and defended, the importance of the work carried out within the Codex Alimentarius framework, and has given equal importance to scientific justification for the measures adopted b y each country, whether they be based on the Codex itself or on other technical or scientific evidence, as required by the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. Given that the Codex Alimentarius is currently developing working materials on front -of-pack nutrition labelling, Costa Rica wishes to request once again that the Mexican delegation clarify its position regarding the work carried out in the Codex in this area. Costa Rica would like to reiterate the request made to the Mexican delegation at this Committee's previous meetings, to indicate the scientific basis or international reference standard used to define the key parameters of the standard in question, and to provide relevant justification for the use of the front -of-pack warning sign as supple mentary nutrition information, the scientific basis for setting classification parameters, according to which a product is considered to contain excessive calories, sugar, saturated fats, trans fats or sodium, given that they are not Codex -based. 2.358. Turning to the consumption by children of products containing added caffeine or sugar substitutes, Costa Rica requests the delegation of Mexico to refer to either the international reference standard used or the risk analysis establishing the risk posed to children by the consumption of products containing these ingredients. Costa Rica believes that the measure adopted by Mexico could generate inconsistencies with TBT Agreement obligations, in particular those established in Articles 2.2 and 2.4. Costa Rica maintains its view in this Committee that, as things currently stand worldwide in light of the COVID -19 pandemic, the implementation of certain sanitary and phytosanitary measures that create additional restrictions or burdens, constitutes a challenge tha t hampers global economic recovery efforts, especially in developing countries that are reliant on international trade, such as Costa Rica. This is without prejudice to the power that Members have to adopt them if considered necessary. Costa Rica would be grateful if the Mexican delegation could provide information about the status of this draft Amendment. 2.359. In response, the representative of Mexico provided the following statement. As has been mentioned in previous meetings of this forum, the delegation of M exico is participating actively in the front -of-pack labelling standard -setting work through the Codex Alimentarius. However, the lack of an international standard on the subject does not prevent a Member from issuing Technical Regulations on front -of-pack labelling on pre -packed foods and non -alcoholic beverages in order to protect and fulfil its legitimate public interest objectives. The technical and scientific evidence requested can be found in the bibliography of Mexican Official Standard NOM -051-SCFI/ SSA1 -2010. Regarding the questions on this measure, we invite those concerned to consult the information that was provided in previous Committee discussions and reflected in the minutes contained in documents G/TBT/M/80 , G/TBT/M/81 , G/TBT/M/82 and G/TBT/M/83 . In addition, it would be particularly relevant to recall that the Government of Mexico granted a period from 1 April to 31 May 2021 for the marketing of products without penalty if they only complied with the new front -of-pack labelling system on their labels, and not with other commercial and health information that came into force on 1 April 2021. This was so as to recognize the need for sto ck turnover of products that were already at the final point of sale to the end consumer before 1 April 2021. Furthermore, the use of adhesive materials to cover the label of origin is permitted, provided that they meet all the commercial and health inform ation requirements under NOM -051-SCFI/SSA1 -2010. The delegation of Mexico reiterates its willingness to clarify any doubts that the Members of this Committee may have on the implementation of this Technical Regulation. Such concerns may be sent in writing via the relevant contact point. 96 For previous statemen ts follow the thread under ID 608 . G/TBT/M/85 - 97 - 2.1.3.49 India – Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020 (IND/131); Amendment in Policy Condition No. 2(iii) to Chapter 95 of ITC (HS), 2017 - Schedule -I (Import Policy) (IND/143), G/TBT/N/IND/131, G/TBT/N/IND/143, G/TBT/N/IND/68 (ID 63297) 2.360. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union remains concerned about India's Toys Quality Control Order and in particular the certification requirements introduced by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). As of 1 January 2021, entry into force of the regulatory order, all toy imports have come to standstill. The order mandates that only toys with BIS marking may enter the country as of 1 January 2021. Factory audits by BIS auditors are a precondition to obtain th e necessary BIS marking. While domestic toy producers have had the opportunity to comply with regulatory order and BIS auditors have audited domestic facilities, the same cannot be said for plants in third countries. European companies have submitted the n ecessary applications well in time to furnish Indian authorities with the necessary information to enable factory audits by BIS auditors. Although officially factory audits abroad can now be done, this is still conditional on travel restrictions and BIS au ditors do not travel to countries depending on testing requirements or quarantine requirements. This represents a major challenge for European companies, as it means no certification in Europe so far. The European Union previously suggested to allow third -party audits or virtual audits of third country factories (such flexibility is allowed for domestic manufacturers). However, we understand that no progress has been made in this direction. Without any alternative measure, the requirement for factory certif ication/audits will remain highly problematic and European companies will continue to face unfair competition with local manufacturers. The European Union would be grateful if India could respond directly to the concerns raised. 2.361. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. In the last three WTO TBT Committee meetings, the United States has urged India to provide a means by which foreign firms can comply with the foreign factory audit requirements of the Toys Quality Control Order 2020 (QCO). US firms remain unable to ship toys to India because they have no ability to comply with this portion of the QCO, given that India has been unwilling to accept virtual audits and will not conduct in -person audits due to COVID -19-related trave l restrictions on the part of India's Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) authorities. One US company reports its last shipment of toys occurred over a year ago. At the June meeting, the Government of India noted, "There is no provision in BIS (Conformity Ass essment) Regulations, 2018, to undertake virtual inspection or the use of recognized third -party certification of companies in the country of manufacturing to meet the QCO's in-person audit requirements for foreign manufacturing facilities. However, the Go vernment of India is considering the introduction of relevant enabling provisions to undertake virtual/remote inspection for BIS conformity assessment activities." We request that India provide an update on this effort. 2.362. US industry reports that domestic ma nufacturing facilities have secured inspections from BIS authorities, thereby achieving compliance with the QCO's audit requirements, even as foreign firms have been unable to secure inspections abroad. US industry has shared reports that BIS has started, or is prepared, to conduct factory audits in countries that have lifted their quarantine, though this policy does not appear to impact any major toy -producing countries. The US requests that India ensure that its conformity assessment procedures are applie d so as to grant access for suppliers of imported toys under similar conditions to those accorded to toys produced domestically. This can be done by either temporarily waiving the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) foreign factory audit requirement until suc h a time when Indian inspectors can travel to all foreign facilities or implementing a system for conducting and accepting virtual audits in place of in -person audits. As the Government of India noted in June, the average time to grant a toy licence is "ge nerally four to six months after the scheduled factory audit." Therefore, it is unlikely that foreign exporters will be able to resume exports of toys to India until sometime in 2022, even if a solution to this problem is implemented immediately. We urge I ndia to address the concerns raised by several members and allow for virtual inspections as soon as possible. 2.363. The representative of China provided the following statement. 1. According to the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, the toys used by children un der 14 years of age shall conform to the corresponding Indian standards. All the toy companies exporting to India encounter repeated testing, factory inspection and other requirements. The cost of the certification is high, and it adds difficulties to smal l and medium -scale manufactures. During the certification process, an additional US$10,000 deposit, application fee, annual licence fee, ISI logo fee are required, which increase the 97 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 632 . G/TBT/M/85 - 98 - cost of the enterprise and cause obstacles to international trade, which is against Article 5.1.2 of the TBT Agreement. It is recommended that the Indian Government could consider as much as possible not to increase too much cost of enterprises, and only select high -risk toy categories for mandatory certification. 2. The Toys ( Quality Control) Order 2020 stipulates that the certification process is subject to conformity testing from third party laboratories. But at present, the third -party laboratories of BIS approved toy standards IS 9873 and IS 15644 are all located in India. It is difficult for Chinese companies to send samples for inspection, which affects the testing efficiency. It is recommended that the third -party laboratory could include all ILAC -accredited laboratories. 2.364. 3. The Toys (Quality Control) Order 2020 came into force on 1 January 2021, and great changes are incorporated into compulsory certification. The certification process is complicated with many procedures. Enterprises need to prepare a lot of product certification materials. The factory inspections are req uired, and the audit cycle is lengthy. Moreover, the impact of COVID -19 epidemic makes factory inspections difficult. Therefore, foreign toy certification is suspended in India. The transition period is too short, it is inconsistent with Article 5.9 of the TBT Agreement. It is recommended that the India could give a transition period at least two years and allow online audits of foreign factories in terms of factory inspections. 4. In October 2020, the BIS issued the document of 10 steps to BIS licence for toys on its official website, in which step 4 stipulated that factories producing electric toys should be equipped with instruments required by IS 15644:2006 Clause 8, 9 and 10. But some tests require expensive and technically demanding equipment that is b eyond the ability of small and medium -sized enterprises and those tests are often done by third -party laboratories. The equipment requirements are therefore unnecessary and unreasonable. According to Article 5.1.2 of the TBT Agreement, it is suggested that India could cancel the equipment requirements for electric toys and other projects. 5. According to newly revised Policy Condition No.2 (iii) to Chapter 95 of ITC (HS), 2017 -Schedule -I (Import Policy), samples are randomly sent to NABL -accredited labs for testing and clearance is made while samples are tested and qualified. It seriously affects the efficiency of customs and increased the importer's storage costs, which does not comply with Article 5.1.2 ，Article 5.2.1 and Article 6.1 of the TBT Agreement. I t is recommended that the Indian Government could release the products based on the certificate of conformity issued by a laboratory accredited by NABL or ILAC. 2.365. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada continues to question the objective of India's requirement that toy manufacturing sites be inspected by Bureau of Indian Standards personnel to verify, among other things, production processes and plant layout, and to collect product samples. Beyond being costly and time consuming , because Indian inspectors are unable to travel due to COVID -19, the inspection requirement is preventing any toy shipments from entering India. Until such time as inspectors are able to resume international travel, at a minimum, Canada seeks India's agre ement to allow virtual plant inspections. In addition, we continue to seek responses to the written questions Canada sent to India in April 2020 that raise the following concerns: - the need for in -country product testing when testing by ILAC certified lab s is available; - the failure to use international standards; - the requirement to nominate and retain an in-country Indian representative; - the need to provide a performance bank guarantee; and - the value of providing an indemnity bond. Canada looks for ward to working with India to ensure access to safe, high quality toys from Canadian firms. 2.366. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. Foreign inspection visits are on hold due to international travel restrictions on account of current pandemic. As soon as the situation of COVID -19 improves and the restriction lifted, India will plan the inspections (factory visit). BIS has recognized a number of laboratories for carrying out toys testing as per various parts of IS 9873 and I S 15644 (Safety of Electrical Toys). All of these laboratories are currently running normally. The IS -wise list of recognized laboratories is dynamically updated and is available on the BIS website. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade ( DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry has issued the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020 under the provisions of BIS Act, 2016 and Rules and Regulations framed thereunder, which envisages conformity assessment scheme -I of BIS (Conformity Assessment) reg ulations, 2018. As per Scheme I of Schedule II of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018, the applicant must submit a complete test report of the product issued from a third -party laboratory and the application. The testing of sample drawn during th e factory inspection is also carried out in a third -party laboratory. Under Scheme -I, a third -party laboratory is defined as "a laboratory established, maintained or recognized by the Bureau or Government laboratories empanelled by the Bureau or any other laboratory decided by the Bureau's Executive Committee". G/TBT/M/85 - 99 - 2.367. As regard marking and labelling requirements, under the Scheme -I, BIS licence will be granted to a manufacturer of toys as per the Indian Standard and all varieties (maybe called items/families/model s/SKU etc.) of toys covered in the standard will get covered under the same licence. No separate application and standard mark are required to cover families of similar toys. Further, to cover all the varieties in a standard under the licence, BIS will be issuing grouping guidelines intending to specify a minimum number of varieties of toys to be tested to consider covering a larger number of varieties in the scope of the licence. This will be with the aim of optimum testing to ensure the safety of all toys for children. The marking of standard mark concerning standard and licence number is a requirement as per the provision of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations and applies to all manufacturers in India as well. The standard mark is essential for the common consumer to understand and identify that product is certified and safe to use. This is already in practice for more than 200 products under mandatory certification and being implemented by more than 1,000 manufacturers of various countries under the F MCS scheme of BIS. As per the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, every toy shall conform to corresponding Indian Standards specified therein and shall bear the standard mark under the licence from BIS as per Scheme -I of BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulat ions, 2018. Under the provisions of Scheme -I, BIS grants a licence to use or apply Standard Mark (ISI mark) on goods and articles as per Indian Standard and not as per International Standards. IS 9873 (Part 1,2,3,4 & 7), specified in the QCO, are identical with International Standard ISO 8124 (Part 1,2,3,4 & 7). Part (9) of IS 9873 is an indigenous standard published to restrict certain phthalates esters in toys and children products. However, the test method used is identical to ISO Standard. Further, IS 1 5644 is also identical with International Standard IEC 62115. 2.1.3.50 Australia - Maturation requirements for imported alcohol (ID 63698) 2.368. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement. Brazil continues to follow closely Australia's proposal to amen d current regulations dealing with alcoholic beverages. In past Committee meetings, we have shared our concerns with Australian technical requirements applicable to cachaça, the Australian Customs Notice Nº 2007/19, which requires that some alcoholic bever ages must be matured in wood for a minimum of two years before delivery from Customs control. This covers all beverages under tariff classifications 2208.20.10, 2208.30.00 and 2208.40.00. Even though said Notice only refers directly to brandy, rum, and whi sky, it encompasses tariff line 2208.40.00 (rum and other spirits obtained by distilling fermented sugarcane products), under which cachaça is classified in Australia. By granting the same treatment to cachaça and rum, the Australian Government does not al low imports of cachaça that are not matured for at least two years in wood. Such a requirement does not relate to any quality standard or sanitary requirement applicable to cachaça. 2.369. Following a public consultation in late -2019, the Australian Border Force (ABF) further explored a potential avenue to amend the Customs Act 1901 (Customs Act) that would enable the legitimate importation of certain alcohol products into Australia whilst retaining the maturation requirements for brandy, whisky, and rum. Accordin g to a more recent public consultation, the Australian Government is developing an approach that is looking to retain Australia's existing maturation requirement for imported brandy, whisky, and rum, but would establish a list of products exempt from this maturation requirement. The proposed list of exempt products would include Cachaça and Pisco and Bourbon. Brazil acknowledges progress in the course of action proposed in the last public consultation. We support the creation of a list of exceptions to the rules set out today in section 105A, thus allowing certain cultural and geographical indications (i.e. Cachaça) that are not traditionally described as brandy, whisky or rum to be imported into the Australian market. In order to avoid any confusion in the Australian market or among Australian consumers, we support that none of the sugar -cane products imported to Australia (matured or unmatured) that are not specifically "rum" should be labelled or marked as "rum". We kindly urge Australia to answer the following questions, which have not been addressed in its previous statements. Could Australia please confirm if this new regulation will also establish new labelling requirements for products other than rum, brandy and whisky? Could Australia provide timefram es for the publication of the final text? 2.370. In response, the representative of Australia provided the following statement. We thank Brazil for its interest in Australia's review of maturation requirements for imported alcohol and provide the following update to the matter raised by Brazil. Australia applies equivalent requirements 98 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 636 . G/TBT/M/85 - 100 - on domestic manufactured products and imported products that are classified as whisky, brandy or rum to be matured in wood for a period of at least two years. These requirements are applied through the Excise Act 1901 and Customs Act 1901 (Customs Act) respectively. Australia is continuing to review its legislative framework for the importation of unmatured alcohol products under section 105A of the Customs Act. In November 2020, the Australian Government undertook stakeholder consultation, through the release of a consultation paper, to seek views on a refined proposed approach to amend section 105A of the Customs Act. The consultation paper was provided directly to the participants of the previous consultation sessions, including the Brazilian Embassy in Canberra, and is available on the Department of Home Affairs website.99 Australia acknowledges Brazil's engagement on the review of Australia's maturation requirements for alcohol. Representatives from the Brazilian Embassy participated in both the 2019 and 2020 consultation processes, led by the Australian Border Force (ABF). The ABF is taking the issues and specific questions raised by Brazil into consideration. The Australian Gover nment is currently considering potential reform options. Any proposed changes will be notified to the Committee in accordance with Australia's obligations under the TBT Agreement after all necessary Australian Government processes have been undertaken rega rding any potential legislative changes. Australia appreciates the positive engagement with Brazil to date including recent bilateral discussion on this matter. 2.1.3.51 India – FSSAI's Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulati ons, 2011 and the new implementing veterinary certificate for dairy products (ID 633100) 2.371. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. India has adopted in December 2019 a new veterinary import certificate for milk and milk prod ucts based on Food Safety and Standards Regulation 2011, that is of great concern to the EU. The provisions of FSSAI's Regulation defines cheese as a "product produced from non -animal rennet or another suitable coagulating agent, which applies equally to b oth domestic and imported foods". It was however still possible for cheese containing animal rennet to access the Indian market provided that it was correctly labelled. The new veterinary certificate requires that milk products have not been manufactured u sing animal rennet. As most European cheese is traditionally made with animal rennet, this means that there is a de facto ban for European cheese entering the Indian market. Similar difficulties arise for cheese by -products, such as whey and lactose. While the EU fully supports the importance of labelling the presence of animal rennet, the EU considers that this new certificate is not proportionate and not in line with the TBT agreement. Veterinary certificates are to address sanitary (human or animal) heal th issues. There is no scientific evidence that cheese produced with animal rennet is harmful to health, or more harmful than cheese produced with artificial/vegetal rennet. We therefore would ask India to change the provisions of that veterinary certifica te and allow for a label clearly indicating the presence of animal rennet in the cheese and its by-products, as it was previously the case. This label would allow consumers to make an informed choice. 2.372. In response, the representative of India provided the f ollowing statement. The provision for non-animal rennet in cheese manufacture is not newly introduced in our regulations. This provision has been existing in our Food Safety and Standards Regulations (FSSR) notified in 2011 and the erstwhile Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules as well. During a recent revision of the milk and milk product standards in FSSR, these provisions were retained as such and continue to be a specified requirement. The requirement of a veterinary certificate has been recently align ed with our FSSR regarding the prohibition on the use of animal rennet. Hence, FSSAI has not introduced any new requirement. 2.1.3.52 India - Order related to requirement of Non -GM cum GM free certificate accompanied with imported food consignment, G/TBT/N/IND/168 (ID 651101) 2.373. The representat ive of the United States provided the following statement. The United States once again reiterate its serious concerns with India's measure mandating "non -GM (genetically modified) origin and GM free certificates" for certain agricultural imports into Indi a, notified on 2 September 2020, as G/TBT/N/IND/168 , and a later notified entry -into-force date of 1 March 2021. The United States submitted comments on G/TBT/N/IND/168 to the WTO on 30 October 2020. The 99 www.homeaffairs.gov.au/reports -and-publications/submissions -and-discussion -papers 100 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 633 . 101 For previous statements fol low the thread under ID 651 . G/TBT/M/85 - 101 - United States would like to remind India of our previous statements delivered at the October 2020, Febru ary 2021, and June 2021 TBT Committee meetings, which detailed our continued concerns regarding India's implementation of this measure. We have also proposed technical cooperation with the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to explore alt ernatives, an offer which has not been accepted. The United States again urges India to withdraw this requirement. India has neither provided science -based justification nor referenced any international standards for this measure despite numerous requests from multiple trading partners. 2.374. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. On 21 August 2020 India issued an Order relating to the requirement of non -GM cum GM free certificate accompanied with imported food consignment, not ified on 2 September 2020. This order entered into force on 1 March 2021. The EU shares India's food safety concerns. However, we would like to highlight the following concerns: 1. The criteria for the selection of the 24 food crops listed in Annexure 1 is not clear. The EU invites India to explain the rationale behind such selection. 2. Non - GM origin cum GM -free certification per consignment should not be required, at least for the listed crops for which no GMOs are authorized in the exporting country for food use. For the EU, this applies to 19 out of the 24 crops listed in Annexure I. For these 19 crops, by law there is no authorization for GMOs in the EU. Therefore, no certificate should be requested to avoid imposing an unnecessary administrative burden . 3. For listed crops for which GM varieties are authorized in the exporting country (for the EU, this applies to maize, soybean, cotton, Argentina canola, and sugar beet) a requirement to produce a certificate for every consignment is not justified. Such a burdensome and expensive measure should only be imposed where recurrent non -compliance has been established by official controls. To date, we have not received any information from India indicating that there were identified instances of non -compliance w ith GM requirements by the EU. 2.375. 4. India should explain why it considers it necessary to impose such a burden on trading partners with a high prevalence of non -GM food on their domestic market and a robust regulatory regime governing the use of GMs. The EU underlines that in addition to the fact that only a limited number of the food crops referred to in the Annexure are authorized to contain GMs, there are very strict traceability and labelling requirements applicable to food that contains GMOs. This allow s a strict and effective separation between non -GM and GM products, with the exception of those containing GM ingredients in a proportion of less than 0.9%, provided that the presence is adventitious or technically unavoidable. This means that the EU's tol erance limit is even stricter than that indicated by FSSAI in its clarification dated 8 February 2021, i.e. 1%. 5. The EU as well as India are both parties to the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The EU adopted Reg ulation 1946/2006 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms. According to Article 12(2) of this Regulation, exporters of GMOs intended for direct use as food or feed or for processing must accompany their exports with a document stating that the export contains or consists of GMOs. This obligation for accompanying documentation of GMOs provides the necessary reassurance to the importers and to the authorities. Therefore, we consider that the additional certification of non -GM food is not needed and is unjustified. In conclusion, the existing EU regulatory provisions already offer satisfactory assurance that EU produce exported to India is in compliance with Indian's requirements. The Indian requirement goes beyond what is necessary to achi eve the stated objective and puts an additional burden and costs on EU exporters. The EU considers that the Order is disproportionate and creates unjustified barriers to trade. The EU would be grateful if the above -mentioned comments could be taken into ac count and replied to. 2.376. The representative of New Zealand provided the following statement. New Zealand acknowledges and supports measures that focus on legitimate objectives, including the protection of human health and safety. New Zealand remains concerned that India's requirements regarding non-GM certification for specific foods is imposing further restrictions and costs on existing trade in goods covered by the measure. New Zealand encourages India to accept a country -wide assurance as an alternative con signment -based non -GM certification. We would appreciate clarification on what consideration India has accorded to less trade -restrictive alternatives for those countries that have not approved the release of any genetically modified crops into the environ ment. New Zealand again notes the measure is implemented under India's food safety legislation. If the protection of human health is the objective, in whole or in part, can India advise whether it intends to also notify the measures to the SPS Committee, g iven its relevance to provisions within the SPS Agreement, particularly Codex Alimentarius? We refer to New Zealand's more detailed written submission of 2 September 2020 on India's notification G/TBT/N/IND/168 which outlines its concerns that remain relevant today. We refer India to the comments New Zealand made on this measure at the most recent meeting of the SPS Committee. New Zealand strongly requests India adopt the least trade -G/TBT/M/85 - 102 - restrictive alternative/s for those countries that have not approved the release of any genetically modified crops into the environment. 2.377. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia supports this trade concern regarding the requirement for a certificate demonstrating that imports of various products, including fresh fruit, vegetables and grains, are free from genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The certificate must be issued by the relevant national authority of the exporting country. We reiterate our concern about this measure and, in particular, about the way in which it will be implemented. Account should be taken of the fact that curre ntly not all analytical techniques to check for genetically modified foods have been developed or certified, meaning that the measure may become an unnecessary obstacle to trade. It should be noted that developing countries in particular have neither the t echnical capacity nor the technologies needed to conduct the relevant analyses concerning GMOs. Furthermore, there is a lack of clarity as regards the products covered and the requirements for market access. We request India to provide information on the e ntry into force of this regulation, and we reiterate that a reasonable interval should be allowed between the publication of technical regulations and their entry into force, in order to allow time for exporters, and particularly those in developing countr ies, to adapt their products or production methods. Lastly, we call upon India to consider alternative ways to avoid the creation of unnecessary obstacles to international trade and to re -submit the notification of the regulation in order to have access to the relevant information. 2.378. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada would like to reiterate concerns raised at previous TBT Committee meetings, SPS Committee meetings, and the Council for Trade in Goods regarding the implementa tion of India's August 2020 Order, which mandates that a non -genetically modified or GM free certificate accompany imported consignments of 24 imported food products. As detailed in Canada's comments submitted through India's TBT Enquiry Point in October 2 020, we are concerned that India's Order will disproportionately impact the ability of GM -producing countries to export to India and unnecessarily restrict international trade. It also remains unclear how this Order will fulfil India's commitment to ensuri ng the health and safety of its population given the lack of available scientific information and/or justification to justify its implementation. To date, India has not provided a satisfactory response to our questions and concerns. Canada encourages India to consider a less burdensome approach to meet the Order's stated food safety goals. As previously stated, the robust, science -based regulatory frameworks developed in countries around the world, including in Canada, should be considered as they assess the risks of GM food products prior to their approval and commercialization. These products are authorized for commercialization only once they have received appropriate safety approvals. Until a satisfactory solution is found and to minimize potential trade disruptions, Canada again requests that India suspend the implementation of this measure and that trade be permitted to continue without a certificate requirement. This would allow for further engagement with Members to discuss and consider an alternate, less trade -restrictive measure to meet India's intended objective. Finally, given the Order's stated objective "to ensure the safety and wholesomeness of articles of food imported into India", Canada reiterates its request that India notify the non -GM Orde r to the SPS Committee. 2.379. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia thanks India for its ongoing engagement and cooperation regarding the use of Non -GM with GM free certificates. Australia recognizes the right of the Indian Government to take measures necessary to ensure the safety and wholesomeness of food imported into India. However, Australia remains concerned with this measure and reiterates that measures should be risk -based and no more trade restrictive than necessary. Australia is concerned that aspects of the regulation add unnecessary costs and create an additional regulatory burden on both Australian exporters and Indian importers. Australia suggests India consider adopting an alternative arrangement to achieve its objective in a less trade - restrictive way. We would be happy to work with India on developing a mutually beneficial alternative solution. Australia welcomes and looks forward to India's continued engagement on this issue. 2.380. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement. Argentina would like to express its concern once again regarding the new Order issued by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), notified in document G/TBT/N/IND/168 , which requires imports of food products to have a certificate of Non-GM product origin. We stress the importance of basing any measure of this type on scientific principles so that it does not become an unnecessary barrier to international trade. Scientific evidence shows that duly authorized GM products are as safe as their conventional equivalents and there is no justification for discriminating between one or the other. G/TBT/M/85 - 103 - We hope that India will amend the notified Order as soon as possible. We recall that we have already submitted more detailed comments and specific que stions through the TBT Focal Point and hope that they will be reviewed by the Indian authorities in order to safeguard the normal flow of trade in agri-food products. 2.381. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement. Paraguay reiterates its support for this specific trade concern regarding the Order issued by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) requiring imports of food products to have a certificate of non -GM origin. The rules apply to 24 food products, requiring the sub mission of an official certificate attesting that the imported products have not been genetically modified, but we have not identified the criteria considered by India for the selection of these products. Furthermore, we endorse the comments made by other Members regarding India's failure to submit or identify the implementation of a regulatory impact assessment, scientific evidence or risk analysis underpinning the measure. Moreover, we are concerned that this measure may generate the unjustified assumptio n that GM foods evaluated and approved on the basis of sound regulatory processes are less safe than non-GM food products. GM products have been subjected to rigorous science -based safety assessments in line with international standards, guidelines and rec ommendations to ensure that they are considered as safe as their conventional counterparts. In view of the above, Paraguay considers that India's rules could restrict trade by creating additional trade barriers, and we therefore request India to reconsider its measure. Paraguay also recalls that, together with other members, it submitted a note in January to the Government of India with the above -mentioned concerns and it looks forward to receiving a reply from India further to its consideration of the said note. 2.382. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement. Uruguay would like to thank the delegation of India for publishing its response in eAgenda ahead of this meeting. Uruguay recognizes India's right to take measures to guarantee the safe ty of food and the health of its population. However, Uruguay wishes to recall that there is consensus internationally that genetically modified products, approved by exporting countries on the basis of Codex recommendations in relation to the risk assessm ent methodology, are equivalent to their conventional counterparts. Therefore, in Uruguay's view, there would not appear to be any technical justification for the implementation of the certification measure proposed by India, taking into account the legiti mate objective, cited in the Order in question, of ensuring the safety and wholesomeness of imported food. Bearing in mind the above -mentioned objective, we would like to reiterate the invitation to the delegation of India to notify this measure to this Or ganization's Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Uruguay wishes to stress the importance of Members establishing measures based on scientific principles and particularly of applying such measures with the objective of minimizing the negative trade effects, in line with the provisions of the TBT and SPS Agreements. Lastly, we wish to reiterate that we continue to await a reply to the joint note submitted by a number of countries, including Uruguay, in New Delhi in January this year. 2.383. The represe ntative of Japan provided the following statement. Japan shares the concerns on India's measure requiring "non -GM origin and GM free certificates" for 24 agricultural products imported to India, because this measure would create unnecessary trade barriers and have negative impacts on agricultural trade between India and other WTO Members. It is very regrettable that for Japan the order has come to effect this March, despite our request to consider the comments and concerns from Member countries to India. If the food items have already been appropriately managed in the exporting Members, the requirement to attach the "non -GM origin and GM free certificates" is unnecessary and excessive measure, because India would have no chance to import unsafe food under th e safety inspection system by the exporting Members. Japan ensures the safety of GM food by controlling import, distribution, and also cultivation under the Japan 's domestic regulations. The GM races not approved by this safety inspection system is not imported to Japan nor distributed domestically. Therefore, Japan would like India to waive the requirement to attach the certificate for food items from members if these Members manage GM food appropriately. 2.384. In response, the representative of India provide d the following statement. The requirement to regulate the import of GM food is not new. It already exists under the Environment Protection Act (1986). This requirement is already notified to WTO and is not trade restrictive as it is uniformly applicable t o import from all countries. The FSSAI order 21 August 2020 made it mandatory for the 24 identified commodities to be accompanied with a Non -GMO origin cum GM -free certificate issued by a competent national authority of the exporting country. On similar li nes, India has been issuing such certificates for its exports to other countries. The Government of India has authorized Export Inspection Council (EIC) as the nodal agency for issuing Non -GMO certificates for export G/TBT/M/85 - 104 - consignments. EIC is issuing more than 9000 Non -GMO certificates for the export of Primary food crops as well as processed food products for export to several countries. It may be noted that the said Order is not trade restrictive as the consignments of the identified commodities are already being accepted for import to India along with the Non -GM origin cum GM Free Certificate in the prescribed format. Section 7 of The Environment Protection Act (1986) and its Rules prescribes that no person shall import or export genetically engineered organis ms/substances or cells except with the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC). DGFT Notification No.2 (RE -2006)/2004 -2009 dated 7 April 2006 on "Import of Genetically Modified Food" states that import of GMOs/LMOs for Food will be governed by the pr ovisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and Rules 1989. GEAC has so far not approved any of the crop varieties of Genetically Modified/Engineered origin listed on the Order mentioned above. The requirement of a Non -GM certificate for import of 24 food crops is an assurance required from Competent Authorities of exporting countries that the food crops exported to India are of Non -GM origin and GM -free. 2.1.3.53 Russian Federation - Federal Law n° 468 on wine making and wine growing in the Russian Federation (ID 650102) 2.385. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. Russia has adopted the "Federal Law Nº 468 -FZ of 27.12.2019 on wine making and wine growing in the Russian Federation". This measure has not been notified to the WTO. On 2 July 2021, a new set of rules entered into force after signature by the President of the Russian Federation of Federal Law N°345 - FZ. It amends three Federal Laws, including the Russian Winemaking Law 468. This new law passed through Duma very quickly and entered into force immediately, without a transitional period. This has created trade disruptions in the immediate aftermath and legal uncertainty for the operators, both at national and international level. Government Resolution N°1807 of 22 October 2021 was published and appears to lead to a suspension of the inspections and control of compliance regarding the classification of products. We would like to get clarification on the impact of the resolution on imported products which have not yet gone throug h Russian customs. We urge Russia to commit to predictable and transparent trade rules, including in the wine and spirits sector. 2.386. A process of alignment of EAEU TR47 is currently on -going. The EU sent proposals of amendments aiming at improving the alignme nt to international standards. The EU hopes these will be considered and retained in order to facilitate international trade both ways. There is today a very limited quantity of wine and spirits produced by EAEU members which are exported to the EU. The EU wishes to underline that the improvement of the quality of the products, the increased involvement in standard setting organizations, and in particular the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV), the development of a functioning system of Geogr aphical Indications, are all factors contributing to a wider opening of the EU market. Far from being fought against, all these factors contributing to a facilitated circulation of products in both directions, are very welcome by the EU. Lastly, it seems t hat the Federal Law also contains provisions covered by the Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. The EU would like to invite Russia to notify the measure to the Council for TRIPS. The EU invites Russia to notify the new wine measure, under the TBT agreement as well as under the TRIPS agreement. Meanwhile, the European Union would like to ask Russia to take these comments into consideration during the ongoing amendments' procedure, while keeping in mind possible future developm ents for the benefit of consumers from both entities. 2.387. The representative of Australia provided the following statement. Australia thanks the Russian Government and industry for its recent engagements on this issue. However, Australia would again like to re iterate our concerns with the Russian Federation's "Federal Law Nº 468 of 27.12.2019 on wine making and wine growing in the Russian Federation". The Federal law poses several barriers to the importation of wine into Russia, which coupled with the short tim elines for the law's implementation, are of concern to the Australian wine industry. A key concern is the mandatory declaration of vintage and variety required under the new law. This does not reflect International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV) pract ices, of which Russia is a member. Article 18 of Russia's Federal wine law stipulates the start date of the wine ageing process as 1 January of the year following harvest, which puts Australian and other southern hemisphere producers at a distinct disadvan tage given that the grape harvest for these regions relies on a different biological growing season and harvest. That is, 1 January in the northern Hemisphere is winter, whereas Australian and New World grapes are harvested early in the year, after 1 Janua ry. In relation to the ageing 102 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 650 . G/TBT/M/85 - 105 - process, Article 18 includes a category referred to as "brand" wine, which requires 18 months ageing following 1 January in the year following harvest. If this means wine cannot be given a brand unless it has been aged for 18 months, only Australian wine from 2018 and earlier would be permitted to carry a brand in Russia. 2.388. Article 24 prohibits the addition of water in wine, which poses a significant barrier to trade for New World growers. Australian food regulations permit the a ddition of water to dilute high sugar musts to aid fermentation. Minimal additions of water aids fermentation during periods of difficult seasonal conditions, including drought. Additionally, Australia notes several obligations within the Federal wine law are inconsistent with the Eurasian Economic Union Technical Regulation 047/2018 "On safety of alcohol products". Australia understands that the implementation of the technical regulation has been postponed until 1 January 2022 to allow harmonization work w ith the Russian Federal Law. Could the Russian Federation please provide an update on this harmonization work and confirm whether the Technical Regulation is expected to enter into force on 1 January 2022? Australia encourages Russia to take into account M embers' concerns with the Federal Law when harmonizing with the EAEU Technical Regulations, including ensuring the Technical Regulation aligns with international production standards. Finally, we note Russia has not yet notified the WTO of the Federal Law despite it being in force for over a year (entered into force on 26 June 2020). We request the Federal Law and the revised EAEU Technical Regulation are notified to the WTO accordingly as soon as possible. 2.389. The representative of the United States provided t he following statement. We are supporting comments by the EU and Australia. 2.390. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement. Argentina once again wishes to note its concern about the implementation of the Russian Federation's wine producti on law (Federal Law No. 468-FZ). In particular, we are concerned about the unilateral alterations of the name of the product that could result in misinformation about the product and confusion for the consumer. Under the new Law, "bulk wine" is considered "wine material", and once the product has been divided up and packaged, it cannot be called "wine" even if it is only packaged and does not undergo any other process or oenological procedure and is not blended with other beverages or substances. Our countr y is confident that through constructive dialogue with stakeholders, appropriate amendments can be made to the regulations in order to avoid unnecessary barriers to trade. 2.391. In response, the representative of the Russian Federation provided the following sta tement. The Federal Law on wine making and wine growing is aimed to settle specific issues in the field of manufacturing of wine raw materials and wine products in the Russian Federation. Besides, the objectives of the Law are to set mandate of the governm ent and self -managing organizations, as well as to set legal status of economic operators in the field of viticulture and winemaking in order to fight counterfeiting and eliminate unnecessary administrative obstacles for the industry. Moreover, the Federal Law aims to create and develop the "wine of Russia" brand by improving the quality of wine products manufactured in Russia. We note that after the Federal Law entered into force the value of wine imports remained stable. As previously explained in this Co mmittee, the Law in question does not establish regulatory framework for protection of intellectual property rights and therefore does not need to be notified under the TRIPS Agreement. With regards to the mentioned Government resolution N°1807, the legal act introduces transition period until 31 December 2021 for provisions of Federal Law on wine making and wine growing applicable to classification of wine. It suspends inspections and market surveillance on conformity for products produced in Russia and/or imported to Russia before entry into force of the Federal Law No. 345. For the update on the amendments to the technical regulation of the EAEU we refer to our statement under STC 60.103 Membership concerns will be conveyed to the capital for further consi deration. 2.1.3.54 Panama - Onions and Potatoes Harvest Life and Sprouting Requirements, G/TBT/N/PAN/86, G/TBT/N/PAN/102, G/TBT/N/PAN/102/Add.1 (ID 662104) 2.392. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. The United States thanks Panama for continuing bilateral discussions regarding implementation of Pan ama's technical 103 Russian Federation - Draft Technical Regulation on Alcohol Drinks Safety (published on 24 October 2011) ( ID 332 ) 104 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 662 . G/TBT/M/85 - 106 - regulations for potato and onion. We also thank Panama for delaying implementation of the potato regulation for another six months. While we appreciate Panama's flexibility on the potato regulation, it would provide greater economic certain ty for exporters if Panama would suspend the measure until technical discussions have concluded. Given these considerations, we reiterate our request that Panama suspend implementation of both the potato and onion regulations until technical discussions have concluded. During our bilateral discussions, we indicated that Panama's technical regulations for potatoes and onions appear to deviate from relevant international standards, and we further indicated Panama's requirements appear to be unjustified, impra ctical, and problematic. How is this information being factored into Panama's implementation and review of its regulations? Panama's onion regulation continues to cause disruption to US exporters. The potato regulation, which is significantly more restrict ive, will likely have a more severe impact once implemented. As such, we again urge Panama to suspend the measures permanently in the absence of technical justification. 2.393. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The Europea n Union would like to join trade concerns voiced by the US. Our exporters are also facing similar difficulties in agri -food trade with Panama. The European Union would like to stress the importance of speedy, consistent and transparent SPS procedures carri ed out by independent authorities, and the need to avoid unnecessary TBT barriers. The European Union is prepared to work bilaterally with Panama to find a satisfactory solution. 2.394. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. As a long -standing supplier of fresh potatoes to Panama with year -round exports, Canada continues to share some of the concerns raised by the United States. In our last intervention at the June WTO TBT Committee, Canada indicated that implementing these new quality requ irements could have a direct impact on our ability to export potatoes to Panama. Canada recognizes that Panama has since delayed the implementation of these measures twice - most recently until 2 April 2022 - to allow for further consultations with trading partners. Panama's openness to engage on this issue in an effort to find a viable solution has also been appreciated. In fact, since the last WTO TBT Committee meeting, Canada and Panama have held a bilateral technical meeting to address elements of conce rn on this issue. Canada found these discussions constructive and hopes to find a long -term solution that will provide a more predictable environment for both importers and exporters through further technical dialogue. Until a long -term solution is found o n the elements of concern, Canada respectfully requests that Panama indefinitely suspend the entry into force of this new regulation. 2.395. In response, the representative of Panama provided the following statement. The delegation of Panama thanks the delegation of the United States, Canada and the European Union and takes note of their concerns, which I will transmit to Panama City. In this regard, we wish to inform the Committee that Panama has been taking into account the comments made by its trading partners, as evidenced by the additional six -month delay granted in the entry into force of the amendment for potatoes. We reiterate our willingness to work with our trading partners and to keep communication between the authorities open. 2.1.3.55 Republic of Korea - Revisi on of Safety Conformation Criteria for Textile Products for Infants, G/TBT/N/KOR/678 (ID 652105) 2.396. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to thank the Republic of Korea for the productive meeting on this issue that took place last July. As a follow -up, can Korea confirm that they are willing to accept conformity testing, to the specific Korean rules for infant clothing, to be performed outside of Korea by internationally accredited laboratories? We are open to further discussing thi s bilaterally. Additionally, regarding the "best practice company" status. Our understanding is that, according to the "Direction on the Designation of Goods subject to Custom Confirmation of Clearance Requirements and Methods of the Confirmation" under Ar ticle 226 of the Customs Act, when a company applies for the best practice company status, the Korea Customs Service (KCS) should consult with the "requirement confirmation agency" and decide whether or not the company meets the conditions for the status. In the case of infant textile products, the Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS) is the "requirement confirmation agency". The legislation is only available in Korean so we would appreciate confirmation of this and also the procedure to be und ertaken. Certain EU industry had applied for recognition as "best practice company" status but the application was rejected last 105 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 652 . G/TBT/M/85 - 107 - December. It would be extremely helpful if Korea could provide an explanation for this rejection in order to facilitate a re -application for the status. 2.397. In response, the representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement. Korea would like to take this opportunity to respond to the issue regarding South Korea's requirements for Textile Products for Infants, wh ich was raised by the EU at this TBT committee. With regard to textile products for infants above 36 months of age, manufacturers and importers can request a domestic or foreign third party -laboratory to conduct product tests on each model of the products in order to confirm that the relevant products conform to safety standards. However, a risk assessment on textile products for infants under 36 months of age in Korea found that such a risk was in fact very high for infants, especially due to injuries caus ed by strings, cords, harmful substances and other hazards. In this vein, the safety of infant clothing products must be tested and inspected by a designated laboratory prescribed by the Special Act On The Safety Of Children's Products to verify that the r elevant product meets the safety standards specific to infant textile products. In such cases, we would like to inform the Committee that a designated laboratory may enter into a contract for the mutual recognition of test results and inspections on verify ing the safety of infant's textile products with any foreign laboratory or institution according to the Special Act. In addition, we would like to point out that the Korea Customs Service (KSC) has the sole responsibility for determining "the best practice importer (company)" according to the Customs Act. In this regard, the EU's claim regarding the procedure for selecting "the best practice importer (company)" should be dealt with in a relevant committee other than this TBT Committee. Korea very much hopes to resolve the EU's concerns at this TBT Committee in a mutually beneficial manner. 2.1.3.56 India - Testing and Certification of telegraph (The Indian telegraph (Amendment) Rules, 2017) and Phase II of the Mandatory Testing and Certification of Telecommunications Equipment (MTCTE), implementing the Indian Telegraph Amendment, G/TBT/N/IND/66, G/TBT/N/IND/159, G/TBT/N/IND/160, G/TBT/N/IND/158 (ID 646106) 2.398. The representative of the United States provided the following statement. We understand that in May 2021, India's Telecommunication Engineering Center (TEC) proposed new implementing procedures for its Mandatory Testing and Certification of Telecom Equipme nt (MTCTE) scheme, which aims to expand the MTCTE's scope to include "applicable ICT equipment" and "related ICT equipment." We also understand that on 22 September 2021, India's TEC released Phases III and IV of the MTCTE scheme, which expands the scope t o include 46 additional product categories. We further understand that this notification also extended recognition of test results from foreign laboratories accredited by International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) signatories as proof of con formity to the MTCTE procedures until 30 November 2021 for Phases I and II, and until 30 June 2022 for Phase III. We request that India notify Phases III and IV to the WTO TBT Committee; provide a new comment period of at least 60 days upon notification; a nd take into account any comments received prior to finalization, pursuant to India's WTO TBT obligations. While we appreciate India's partial extension of its recognition of test results from foreign laboratories accredited by ILAC signatories as proof of conformity to India's MTCTE procedures, we urge India to make recognition of such test results permanent. 2.399. According to US industry, pre -existing regulations under different ministries already govern products under the expanded scope, and expanding the MTC TE scheme would therefore introduce unnecessarily burdensome, complex, and overlapping regulations. We ask that India consider limiting the scope of products under the MTCTE to only core telecom products which connect to telecom networks directly. We also understand that the proposed MTCTE implementing procedures introduce India -specific labelling requirements mandating the labelling/affixation of markings such as "India" and the TEC Essential Requirements (ERs) number with issue date, certificate validity, country of origin, and country of product manufacture. US industry notes that requiring such information on a label would be costly and logistically burdensome, while providing limited utility to end users. According to US industry, as currently drafted, the labelling requirements would also require manufacturers to update labels each time a product certificate is renewed. Furthermore, industry notes that it is not feasible to place TEC logos on previously manufactured products already stocked at various w arehouses and marketplaces abroad and in India. The United States requests that India amend the proposed labelling requirements to allow for the use of QR codes for products without a display. Will India consider this or other alternative solutions in lieu of the currently 106 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 646 . G/TBT/M/85 - 108 - proposed labelling requirements? US industry reports that these proposed procedures were drafted and released without stakeholder consultation. We request that India notify these procedures to the WTO TBT Committee as an addendum to its 2 017 notification of the Telegraph Rules. We also request that India provide a new comment period of at least 60 days upon notification. 2.400. The representative of Canada provided the following statement. Canada appreciates the 22 September 2021 publication of t he extension, from 30 June 2021 to 30 November 2021, of the acceptance of test results and reports from ILAC accredited foreign labs for products covered by the already implemented Phases 1 and 2 of India's Mandatory Testing and Certification of Telecom Equipment programme. However, we hope the acceptance of foreign test results will be made permanent and expanded to include safety and EMC/EMI requirements, and that future changes to the programme's conditions for implemented phases will be made available w ell in advance of implementation. Moreover, Canada was surprised to see that the same 22 September 2021 publication, which only appeared on India's Telecommunications Engineering Centre website and was not notified to this Committee, also indicated the imp lementation of Phases 3 and 4. This increases the number of product categories, for which India has implemented the programme, by 46. We note with particular concern that the acceptance of applications for the approval of products covered by Phase 3 began less than one month later on 11 October 2021 and that firms must complete their products' certification by 1 July 2022, just eight months later. 2.401. We appreciate that, for Phase 3 products, testing in foreign ILAC accredited labs, for requirements other than safety and EMC/EMI, will be extended until 30 June 2022, but believe this extension should be permanent. Canada wishes to emphasize, however, that completing certifications by 1 July 2022 for safety and EMC/EMI will be particularly challenging. We have sim ilar concerns regarding Phase 4. As we indicated in June, producing a product for testing, shipping it to India and then waiting for it to be tested, before being able to put it on the Indian market, is a very time consuming and costly process. We would al so recall that, consistent with the time needed for our exporters to meet new requirements, at the last meeting of the Committee, Canada requested a one -year notification period before future phases were implemented. Regarding India's statement at the June meeting of the Committee that MRAs can be used by Members to address in -country testing requirements, Canada notes it has had no response to its 2020 indication of its openness to discussing an MRA. In closing, we wish to reiterate that the permanent acce ptance of foreign test results, in appropriately accredited labs, is the least trade -restrictive manner of achieving legitimate safety and security objectives. In addition, we wish to highlight that the use of international standards, and both publication and WTO notification transparency requirements, are cornerstones of mutually beneficial market access. 2.402. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. Testing capability for the requirements outlined in the Indian Telegraph (Amen dment) Rules, 2017, is reviewed from time to time. Regarding the need for relaxation for products to be covered under future phases of MTCTE, they will be looked into at the time of the launch of notification for such products. Moreover, the MRA agreement with India shall facilitate OEMs to test in MRA partner country, which may lessen the burden in terms of cost and time. To maintain business continuity and to ensure existing business supply chains remain undisturbed, the date of enforcement for the produc ts covered under future phases of MTCTE is likely to be from six to eight months from the date of notification. Considering a relaxation for six months for the labelling requirement for MTCTE -certified products from the date on which testing and certificat ion become mandatory, the OEMs will get more than one year to comply with the labelling requirement of MTCTE for such products. The request to provide firms with at least one year to comply with any future phases of the MTCTE shall be considered at the tim e of launch of future phases of MTCTE. Phase -III of MTCTE is under consideration at the moment, and timelines for implementation will be intimated when the proposal is finalized. 2.1.3.57 India - Plain Copier Paper (Quality Order) 2020, G/TBT/N/IND/140 (ID 681107) 2.403. The representative of Indon esia provided the following statement. Indonesia would like to reiterate its concern on Plain Copier Paper (Quality Control), Order 2020 as raised previously in February and June 2021. Indonesia remains concerned regarding the provisions stated in Plain Copier Paper (Quality Control), Order 2020. The certification shall be carried out only by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) based on the Conformity Assessment Regulation 2018 through the Scheme 1 of Schedule -II which shall require factory inspection, samplin g and testing of the product as well 107 For previous stateme nts follow the thread under ID 681 . G/TBT/M/85 - 109 - as licensing procedures. Indonesia regrets that India has ignored the current pandemic situation that made factory inspection is an impossible task to do due to travel ban and social distancing policy. Therefore, Indone sia urges India to consider the use of remote assessment in conducting factory inspection or any relaxation policy as a mean to facilitate trade and minimize technical barrier to trade, particularly in this difficult time. Indonesia has extensively communi cated its concern through the enquiry points of TBT WTO in January 2021, bilateral meeting on February 2021 and even the Permanent Mission of India in Geneva. Indonesia regrets that India is yet to provide substantive response to Indonesia's concern. To en sure the laboratories competency under ILAC signatory framework, particularly the testing methods being used under the Plain Copier Paper (Quality Control) Order, Indonesia reminds India to adopt available International Standard which are ISO references fo r plain copier paper as a basis for testing method. 2.404. Indonesia also seeks clarification from India regarding the following matters: Eco marking labelling on paper, is it mandatory or voluntary? Also, international standards are being referred as sampling me thod in IS 14990:2018. Indonesia, therefore, requests India to accept testing results from accredited laboratory under the ILAC when implementing this regulation as a mean to facilitate conformity assessment procedures conducted by conformity assessment bo dies in Indonesia. In this regards, a Mutual Recognition Arrangement can take place to ensure that testing results from accreditated conformity assessment bodies in Indonesia can be accepted by BIS. Concerning there are some products that cannot be exporte d during the COVID -19 pandemic due to stringent requirements in the regulation, Indonesia requests India to postpone or provide sufficient transition time to allow industries to comply with the regulation. Indonesia is also aware that India through the Min istry of Commerce and Industry had published mandatory implementation of Plain Copier Paper (Quality Control) Order 2020 Regulation on 5 June 2020 and have come into force on 5 December 2020. In this regard, Indonesia kindly reminds India to notify this te chnical regulation to WTO TBT, as the addenda of the previous notification. 2.405. In response, the representative of India provided the following statement. There is no provision in BIS (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018, for remote assessment or any othe r means for inspection. The Government is considering alternatives for in -person inspections. The discussion is in the initial stages. The QCO has listed the mandated standard and the conformity assessment procedures required. 2.1.3.58 United Arab Emirates - Requir ement of G -mark for every toy (ID 702108) 2.406. The representative of India provided the following statement. India is deeply concerned about the UAE's G -mark requirement for all children's toys exported to the UAE, and it can be issued only by the agencies autho rized by the GCC Standardisation Organisation. This requirement of G - mark makes Indian products uncompetitive in the UAE as no agency is authorized to issue G -mark in India. To get G -mark certified products, Indian exporters have to send the entire consign ment to the place where it can be G -mark certified. As per the extant regulation, the G -mark needs to be obtained for each and every toy. This process involves additional procedural requirements; it is also cost intensive and makes the Indian product uncom petitive when placed in the UAE market. Further, during the conformity assessment, the G -mark Notified Bodies (NBs) frequently request physical samples of all products in a group, not only of the representative item. Despite the latest GSO guidance specify ing test reports are required only for one representative item from a product group, a physical inspection of all items in a product group is burdensome, costly and inconsistent with Article 5.1.2 of the TBT Agreement. As per Article 5.1.2 of the TBT Agree ment, Members are obliged to ensure that CAPs are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade. CAPs shall not be stricter or applied more strictly than is necessary to give the importing Member adequate confidence that products conform with the applicable technical regulations or standards, taking account of the risks non -conformity would create. Hence the UAE requested to consider that when the G mark is obtained for each and e very toy, then the physical sampling should not be insisted by the Notified Bodies for all the products in the group. Such insistence is trade -restrictive and renders high costs and difficulties. Besides, it is also inconsistent with Article 5.1.2 of the T BT Agreement. 2.407. The representative of the United Arab Emirates did not provide a response to the concerns raised. These concerns were subsequently transmitted to the relevant authorities. 108 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 702 . G/TBT/M/85 - 110 - 2.1.3.59 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - Technical Regulation for Building Materials – Part 4: Bricks, Tiles, Ceramics, Sanitary Appliances, and related products (published on the official gazette on 22/03/2019), G/TBT/N/SAU/993, G/TBT/N/SAU/993/Rev.1 (ID 698109) 2.408. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union remains concerned by t he difficulties related to the implementation of the Technical Regulation for Building Materials and in particular the Saudi Quality Mark (SQM). Since the establishment of the Saudi Quality Mark, the European companies are facing important challenges that has resulted in a de facto quantitative restriction to imports. The European Union would like to reiterate the following points, which still represent a major concern: Audits are disproportionate and exceed the requirements set out in ISO standards. To obt ain the SQM, applicants are requested to prove compliance with SASO ISO 13006, which is supposedly based on the International Standard ISO 13006 (for specific characteristics of ceramic tiles). However, the SQM audits requires to conduct all the tests for rectified and non -rectified tiles, which seems to be unnecessary and arbitrarily requested by SASO. High Costs . While the previous system applied in Saudi Arabia was based on different fees commensurate with the shipment value, the current SQM has a (very high) fixed price that is prohibitive for SMEs, which are simply not able to invest this amount of money for limited volumes exported each year. This has de facto excluded many EU producers from the market. 2.409. Limited number of Certification Bodies . The limit ed number of Certification Bodies accredited by SASO in Europe creates bottlenecks as applicants are faced with long waiting times before being assigned a date for the audit. This delay results in foregone business for EU companies. Unclear audit procedure s. SASO has never published a list of documentation required for the audit; hence, there is no standardized procedures and there can be discrepancies in the audit requirements set out by different Certification Bodies. As a result, the SQM procedures are u npredictable and applicants are subject to different conditions based on the Certification Body they utilize. Yearly Surveillance Audits . The yearly renewal of the SQM should entail less requirements due to its surveillance nature. However, companies have reported that the yearly surveillance includes the same level of detail as the first SQM audit – which is completely disproportionate to its purpose. The European Union would like to invite the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to ensure that the Saudi Quality Mark will not constitute a barrier to trade. We appreciate the bilateral talks on this issue and remain available to continue the dialogue and solve the concern in the near future. 2.410. In response, the representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the foll owing statement. Saudi Arabia would like to thank the European Union for raising this matter and the constructive bilateral meeting this week. As a result of this bilateral meeting, the competent authority in Saudi Arabia is working on a more comprehensive response that involves various units, and we will reply directly to the EU. 2.1.3.60 Colombia – Good manufacturing practices of overseas production establishments, G/TBT/N/COL/242 (ID 697110) 2.411. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to thank Colombia for its reply of November 2020 to the EU written comments and for the extensive bilateral discussions and hopes that the Decree no 162 published on 16 February 2021 will not create unnecessary burdensome requirements for EU exporter s of wines and spirits. The European Union notes that Article 3 of the adopted decree refers to the possibility to present alternatives to the Good Manufacturing Practices certificate upon import to Colombia. EU exporters of wines and spirit drinks already comply with the existing obligation to submit Free Sales Certificates for sanitary register. The Free Sales Certificates state that the product is compliant with the EU legislative requirements, which encompass Good Manufacturing Practices. The European U nion therefore considers that Free Sale Certificates issued by EU member States would comply with the Colombian requirement to provide Good Manufacturing Practices certificate upon import. The European Union would, therefore, like to ask Colombia to confir m this interpretation. The European Union is prepared to continue the bilateral work should there be any need for additional clarifications. 2.412. In response, the representative of Colombia provided the following statement. Colombia thanks the European Union (E U) for working with the relevant health authorities to clarify the 109 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 698 . 110 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 697 . G/TBT/M/85 - 111 - concerns raised regarding compliance with Decree No. 162 of 2021. In this regard, we wish to report that the relevant authorities have been working with the EU, through the EU Trade Section in Colombia, on issues related to compliance with Decree No. 162 of 2021, particularly in respect of the acceptance of certificates of good manufacturing practices, thus responding to the concerns raised regarding the acceptance of certificates of free sa le (CVL). The text issued amended Article 22 of Decree No. 1686 of 2012, so as to ensure equal conditions regarding the certificate of good manufacturing practices (GMP) for domestic producers and producers located outside the national territory, and provi ded the following four (4) alternatives for complying with the technical regulation: (a) Certificate of good manufacturing practices (GMP), from the manufacturing and/or packaging establishment, issued by the relevant authority of the country of origin; (b ) Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System certificate or document supporting its implementation, issued by the relevant authority of the country of origin; (c) Certification issued by the relevant authority, by the accredited certificatio n body or by the authorized third party in the country of origin of the product, stating that the alcoholic beverage and the producer comply with the technical standards, processes or procedures; (d) Certificate of good manufacturing practices of the manuf acturing and/or packaging establishment, issued by the National Food and Drug Surveillance Institute (INVIMA). 2.413. Thus, in order to comply with the requirement in the case of imported beverages, the Decree sets out four feasible options that do not disregard the regulations of the country of origin of the parties concerned, meaning that such parties can assess each of the above options and apply one of them in order to comply with the Colombian regulations. The health authorities have reiterated that certifica tes of free sale – referred to by the EU – may be included within the scope of paragraph (c), provided that they comply with the provisions of that paragraph, namely: (i) they are issued by the relevant authority, by the accredited certification body or by the authorized third party in the country of origin of the product, and; (ii) they state that the alcoholic beverage and the producer comply with the technical standards, processes or procedures or are subject to monitoring and inspection. In this context , the relevant authorities have reviewed the documents provided by the EU and have expressed their willingness to continue working with the EU and the industry to resolve the concerns raised so as to favour compliance with the technical regulation. In ligh t of the foregoing, we invite the EU to continue its bilateral work with our health authorities. 2.1.3.61 Argentina - Requirement of affidavit along with the product certification from a certified body for export of boards derived from wood (ID 696111) 2.414. The representative of India provided the following statement. In response to India's question in the previous TBT Committee meeting, Argentina provided a reply, and we thank Argentina for their reply. The reply, however, does not answer the questions raise d by India, hence we reiterate our concern. Argentina has notified the requirement of an affidavit in addition to a product certification from a certified body for the export of boards derived from wood. India thanks Argentina for its notification G/TBT/N/ARG/342/Add.6 dated 22 February 2021 on the proposed draft Resolution "Technical quality and safety requirements applicable to boards derived from wood". As per Article 2 of the Draft Resolution, besides product certification, an affidavit from a certified body indicati ng compliance to the requirements is required. India has submitted its queries to Argentina's Enquiry Point seeking relevance of an affidavit indicating a product's compliance, mainly when a certification requirement is already in place. India believes tha t the additional requirement of an affidavit will add both to the cost and procedural burden for exporters, thereby adversely affecting the product's competitiveness in Argentina. Further, no risk assessment for the additional requirement of an affidavit i s shared by Argentina. Hence, prima facie Argentina's requirement of an affidavit in addition to certification requirement appears to be trade restrictive. It is also not known what other less trade -restrictive or alternative measures Argentina considered before deciding on the present measure. Given the above, Argentina is requested to: not to impose the additional affidavit requirements; respond to the queries submitted by India to its Enquiry Point; and if it cannot do away with the additional affidavit requirements, share the risk assessment done in arriving at the imposing such a trade -restrictive measure. 2.415. In response, the representative of Argentina provided the following statement. We regret that Argentina's response has not been sufficient for our co lleague from India, so we will forward this new question to our capital. 111 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 696 . G/TBT/M/85 - 112 - 2.1.3.62 China - National Standards on Limits of Volatile Organic Compounds for Furniture, G/TBT/N/CHN/1094, G/TBT/N/CHN/1095, G/TBT/N/CHN/1096 (ID 509112) 2.416. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The European Union would like to refer to its previous statements on Chinese notification G/TBT/N/CHN/1094 , G/TBT/N/CHN/1095 and G/TBT/N/CHN/1096 . The European Union would like to express concerns over the draft Chinese Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) st andard for furniture "Limit of Harmful Substances of Furniture", which is currently open for comments in the context of a public consultation in China and which would replace standards GB 18584 -2001 Indoor Decorating and Refurbishing Materials - Limit of H armful Substances of Wood -based Furniture and GB 28481 -2012 Limit of Harmful Substances of Plastic Furniture. As far as we know, the publication of the standard is expected in the beginning of 2022, and two years after adoption will be given for implementa tion. The draft standard is intended to amend those notified to the WTO in 2015 ( G/TBT/N/CHN/1094 , G/TBT/N/CHN/1095 , and G/TBT/N/CHN/1096 ). Unfortunately, despite the collaboration between the European furniture industries and Chinese standardization bodies on a new, improved version of the standard, that would take into acc ount international standards applied in the area of VOC measurements, the draft Chinese standard "Limit of Harmful Substances of Furniture" fails to bring relevant improvements and presents similar concerns as the original text notified to the WTO in 2015. 2.417. High indoor air quality is essential for the health and wellbeing of European and Chinese consumers. The European Union understands and supports the introduction of standards limiting the emissions of harmful substances from furniture. However, several im portant concerns remain. The approach to wooden furniture adopted in the draft standard is not in line with existing ISO -standards (ISO 16000 -9; -3; -6) and with known (eco -) labels such as BIFMA, EU Eco -flower, Blue Angel. The EU believes that it is very important to harmonize testing methods. The use of proven standards as a basis should be the reference for all countries and the corresponding testing laboratories. Test methods should be chosen by accuracy and should be science -based. The EU would like to ask China to consider harmonizing the requested test methods with ISO 16000 -9, -3, -6. This testing method has proved to be reliable and it would be beneficial for international trade in furniture as producers exporting worldwide would need to comply with one test method. The new standard will have an important economic impact on both European and Chinese producers as it will pose a barrier to exports. The requirement proposed in the Chinese draft standard on Individual Volatile Organic Compounds shows an arbitrary choice of thresholds and is not focused on hazardous substances. The draft standard will therefore overestimate the impact of natural substances normally present in wood but underestimate the impact of toxic substances. 2.418. The unscientific TVOC limi t after a short testing time overestimates the impact of natural substances normally present in wood, leading to a situation where furniture produced from untreated natural wood will fail the test. At the same time, the few restricted individual hazardous substances underestimate the toxic substance. The EU is of the opinion that only toxicologically relevant substances should be considered as the basis for evidence. To make sure that the standard does not hinder the use of natural wooden materials and wate r-based coatings, health -based criteria with a focus on individual hazardous substances (not on TVOC) should be applied. As regards the testing method referring to surface area approach vs. volume approach, the testing method for wooden furniture proposed by China is based on the volume of furniture, despite international standards (ISO 16000 -9) recommending basing measuring methods on the emitting surface. At the same time, upholstered furniture is tested using the surface area approach, although determini ng the surface area of upholstered furniture is very difficult and error -prone due to its shape. The draft Chinese standard encourages an approach where producers simplify the designs and functionality of the furniture produced for the Chinese market in or der to pass the test. The volume -based approach to the testing method used in the draft Chinese standard would make the final emission of the product depend on the design and functions (for example number of drawers) rather than the choice of raw material. A simpler design will limit the choice for Chinese and European design. In addition, products made from natural materials and/or with water -based coatings will no longer be available to Chinese consumers. The Chinese draft standard would also pose problem s for Chinese furniture manufacturers when exporting to the EU. This would also be the case for manufacturers producing in the EU, because they would then have to use organic solvent -based lacquers to pass the tests. 112 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 509 . G/TBT/M/85 - 113 - 2.419. For wood -based furniture the "volume fa ctor loading" defined as: "the ratio of the volume of wooden furniture to the volume of the environmental test chamber" is adopted. This approach is different from the surface area approach used in existing internationally recognized product emission stand ards, such as ISO 16000 -9. To make sure that the standard pushes the furniture industry towards the use of low emitting materials for all furniture, surface area approach is recommended. The EU welcomes the change applying to formaldehyde emission, as indi cated in the latest version of the standard, dating 21 October. It seems that the standard now follows the internationally approved method of ISO 16000 -3 – the DNPH method). The EU hopes that China maintains this approach and that DNPH method remains the c hosen way to measure formaldehyde emissions. The EU would appreciate it if China could share information about the timing for the TBT notification of the new standard. 2.420. In response, the representative of China provided the following statement. In May 2019, the Standardization Administration of China (SAC) issued a plan to revise the mandatory national standard of the Limits of Hazardous Substances in Furniture (Plan No 20190075 -Q-339). The Limits of Hazardous Substances in Furniture will integrate three exis ting relevant mandatory national standards, as well as relevant parts in Limits of Hazardous Substances in Plastic Furniture. The integrated mandatory national standard will cover wood furniture, soft mattress, soft sofa, plastic furniture, stone furniture , etc. Hazardous substances include formaldehyde, volatile organic compounds, heavy metal elements, decomposable aromatic amine, flame retardant, etc. In the standard -drafting process, we adhere to the principle of openness and transparency, taking into account of opinions from all walks of life and giving adequate consideration to ISO -related standards. We actively engage foreign enterprises and experts in the formulation and revision of the standard to ensure it is scientific and reasonable. At present, t he national furniture standardization technical Committee is organizing members to vote on this standard. After the voting, it will be submitted for approval and it is expected to be approved by the national Standards Committee in 2022. 2.1.3.63 European Union - Testing methods for prohibited chemicals of regulation on cosmetic products, G/TBT/N/EU/752 (ID 680113) 2.421. The representative of China provided the following statement. China recommends the EU to clarify the testing methods for volatile nitrosamines contained in nail polish products. 2.422. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to recall that a reply to China's comments of 16 December 2020 was submitted via the TBT Enquiry Point on 4 February 2021, which was elaborated in our stat ement for the TBT Committee in February 2021. The EU referred China to this statement and the reply of 4 February 2021 during the last TBT Committee in June 2021. During the last TBT Committee, however, China suggested that the EU clarify the testing metho ds for volatile nitrosamines contained in nail polish products. The EU believes this matter concerns the draft Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the use of Methyl -N-methylan thranilate in cosmetic products notified to the WTO on 15 March 2021 under reference number G/TBT/N/EU/785 . In this regard, the EU is not aware of a wide use of Methyl -N- methylanthranilate in nail polish products. Methyl -N-methylanthranilate is a fragrance ingredient used in various cosmetics, including fine fragrances, shampoos, soaps and other toiletries as well as in non -cosmetic products such as household cleaners and detergents. Methyl -N-methylanthranilate is a secondary amine, and thus prone to nitrosation. It should not be used in combination with nitrosating substances. The nitrosamine content should be less than 50 ppb. 2.423. The concerned measures do not regulate testing methods to detect volatile nitrosamines in nail polish or cosmetic products. It is the responsibility of the man ufacturer to ensure that they remain below the permitted concentration. As regards testing methods, there is ISO/TR 14735:2013 Cosmetics — Analytical methods — Nitrosamines: Technical guidance document to minimize the likelihood of N -nitrosamine formation in cosmetic products that also provides a description of the analytical methodologies available for the reliable determination of N -nitrosamines in cosmetic products: ISO - ISO/TR 14735:2013 - Cosmetics — Analytical methods — Nitrosamines: Technical guidan ce document for minimizing and determining N -nitrosamines in cosmetics. Last but not least, Cosmetics Europe, a European trade association for the cosmetics and personal care industry, 113 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 680 . G/TBT/M/85 - 114 - developed in 2009 a technical guidance document on minimising and deter mining nitrosamines in cosmetics.114 2.1.3.64 European Union - Uniform procedures and technical specifications for the type - approval of motor vehicles with regard to their emergency lane keeping system (ELKS), G/TBT/N/EU/767 (ID 700115) 2.424. The representative of China provided the following statement. 1. It is suggested for Article 1.4 to change "control the lateral movement of the vehicle" because the purpose of ELKS is to keep and control the lane and the regulations shall not specify the technology used. 2. For Article 3.1.1.1, China suggests that self -check requirement should be modified as "When turned on, the system should be capable of self -check, which means the system can check if the main electric components and sensors relevant to the system work normally". T he purpose of self -check is to make sure if the system can satisfy the fundamental running conditions and the number of self - check can be defined by the enterprise itself. 3. For Article 3.1.1.2, China thinks that the "Non - electrical failure condition" is contradicted with "e.g. sensor misalignment", since the sensor bias might be caused by electrical failure. 4. For Article 3.2.1.2, China suggests that the behaviour manner of manually stopping the system should not be limited. As long as the purpose of lan e keeping and controlling is achieved, the specific technology should not be restricted. 5. For Article 3.6.2, based on the research conclusion of Chinese LKA system standard, the suggested lane departure should be 0.4m for M1 and N1 vehicles and 0.75m for vehicle of other categories. 6. For Article 3.6.2 (a) the definition is unreasonable since the system in the activated status should always keep the vehicle within the lane and do not need to differentiate other conditions. 7. For Article 3.6.2 (e), the r equirement "in all illumination conditions without blinding of the sensors" is too strict. Quantitative requirement should be raised such as 500lx. For Article 3.6.2 we suggest relevant ELKS requirements for curve lane should be added by referring to the r elevant parts in Chinese LKS standards for passenger car and commercial vehicle. 2.425. 8. For Article 3.6.3.1, we suggest the requirements of steering control effort should be deleted. 9. For Article 3.6.4 the requirements of CDCF warning guidance are too detail ed. We think the warning conditions alone are enough. 10. For Article 4 and Article 5, China suggests the curve lane testing scenario be added by referring to the relevant parts in Chinese LKS standards for passenger car and commercial cars. 11. For Articl e 4.2(b) and 5.2(b) the requirement of environment illumination condition, 2000lx, is too high and China suggests that the number should be 500lx. 12. For Article 4.2(c) and 5.2(c), China suggests that the environment temperature range be modified from 5 ℃~45℃ to -20℃~40℃. 2.426. In response, the representative of the European Union provided the following statement. The EU would like to recall that a reply to China's written comments of 7 February 2021 was submitted via the EU TBT Enquiry Point on 13 April 2021. Th e main elements of this reply were also re-stated in the EU's responding statement during the last TBT Committee in June. During the last TBT Committee in June, China formulated several drafting suggestions in its statement. The EU would like to thank Chin a for these drafting suggestions. However, the measure was actually adopted on 19 April 2021 and it is currently not foreseen to be revised. It is intended, nevertheless, to bring this discussion to the working group on automated and connected vehicles (GR VA), subsidiary body of the World Forum on automotive regulations (WP29) of the United Nations. For example, ELKS requirements could be included in UN regulation 79 on steering and UN Regulation 130 on lane departure warning systems. The EU will engage con structively in the UN discussion and calls on China to contribute to this process at expert level and to apply these regulations when amended. 2.2 Ninth Triennial Review 2.427. The Committee adopted its Ninth Triennial Review Report, subsequently circulated in G/TBT/46 . 114 https://cosmeticseurope.eu/files/9114/6407/6715/Technical_Guidanc e_Document_on_Minimising_and_Determ ining_Nitrostamines_in_Cosmetics_ -_2009.pdf 115 For previous statements follow the thread under ID 700 . G/TBT/M/85 - 115 - 2.3 Exchange of experiences 2.3.1 Transparenc y 2.428. The Secretariat provided an update on the eTools integration project. As had been announced during the Transparency Thematic session , held in February 2021, the Secretariat was currently working on developing an integrated platform, merging several TBT o nline tools, namely, the TBT IMS, TBT NSS and ePing. The objective of this work, the Secretariat noted, was to improve services in terms of ease of use, data consistency and resource efficiencies. The new platform was still under development and an overvie w of its planned features had been presented to interested delegations during a Friends of eTools meeting held in October 2021. The intention was to launch the platform in March 2022. The Secretariat also recalled that earlier in 2021, the Secretariat had carried out a comprehensive survey among registered ePing users and received 1,400 responses. These responses gave the tool on average a mark of eight out of ten. More than 80% of the respondents read their email alert either daily or weekly – public and p rivate sector alike. Several suggestions for improvements had been made and some of these would be addressed in the new platform. One suggestion was for the development of an ePing smart phone application. Following up on this, the Secretariat was working together with UNDESA and ITC to develop a prototype application in the first half of 2022. Further information on ePing and the results of the survey can be found in document G/TBT/GEN/317 . 2.429. The Secretariat also provided an update on new COVID -19 related notifications submitted to the TBT Committee. Since the beginning of the pandemic (March 2020), WTO Members had submitted a total of 179 Covid -related TBT notifications. This represented slightly over 40 % o f all Covid -related WTO notifications. Since the last meeting of the Committee, a total of 26 new such notifications had been submitted to the Committee. These notifications, it was noted, covered a diverse range of products ranging from medical supplies, personal protective equipment to products more generally. Many of the notified measures were conformity assessment procedures and some, as had been the case previously, notified trade -facilitating measures. 2.3.2 Conformity Assessment Procedure s 2.430. The Chairperson summarized the work of the Committee to date and recalled that at the Committee 's previous meeting, in June, it had been agreed that the Committee would dedicate an informal meeting early in 2022 to discuss work on the conformity assessment gui delines, and that this meeting be informed by an "elements paper" to be prepared by the Secretariat.116 3 OBSERVERS 3.1 Updates 3.1. The representative of UNECE updated the Committee on the work of the UNECE Working Party on Regulatory Cooperation and Standardisation Policies (WP.6). He also noted the relevance to the TBT Committee of work in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), the United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business (UN/CEFACT) and Working Party 6. 3.2. The re presentative of the BIPM provided an update. The full content of this update can be found here. The Chair drew the Committee's attention to information provided by other observers (Codex117, ISO118 and CROSQ119). 116 G/TBT/M/84 , para 4.486 . In a subsequen t communication , contained in ICN/TB T/10 and issued on 9 December 2021, the Chairperson confi rmed the date of th e informal meeting on 10 February 2022 and note d that the Secretariat intended to circulate the elements paper in advance of the February meeting. 117 G/TBT/GEN/319 . 118 G/TBT/GEN/320 . 119 G/TBT/GEN/321 . G/TBT/M/85 - 116 - 3.2 Pending Requests 3.3. With respect to pending requests for observer status, the Chairperson noted that no further requests for observer status had been received. Updated information was available in documents G/TBT/GEN/2/Rev.16 and in document RD/TBT/1/Rev.8 . 3.4. The representative of Turkey reiterated his delegation 's support for the application by SMIIC. He stressed that this organization should not be considered as solely specialised in metrology - it had varying responsibilities and objectives in the area of standardisation, conformity assessment, metrology, accreditation and quality infrastructure. Turkey noted , in addition, that his delegation had been in touch with the delegation of the United States on these points and had expressed a willingness to contin ue to work with the United States, and other Members, to address any outstanding concerns regarding this pending request. It was important, Turkey stressed, that the lack of clear -cut and predictable procedures should not prevent membership from accepting the requests of applications and that every organization be evaluated based on its own merits . 4 ANNUAL REPORT (2021) OF THE COMMITTEE TO THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS (CTG) 4.1. The TBT Committee adopted its report to the CTG. It was circulated in G/L/1420 . 5 OTHER BUSINESS 5.1. The Secretariat proposed to organize a TBT symposium in 20 22. The half -day event would aim to discuss the value of the TBT Committee's work on alleviating regulatory bottlenecks in the global economy. It would address questions about the impact and value of the Committee 's work to th e broader economy, particularly in the area of specific trade concerns (STCs). The Secretariat would seek input from Members, the private sector and academia, as well as other relevant international organizations. The event would most likely take place sep arately from the Committee week. 5.2. The representatives of Brazil , United States and the European Union expressed support for this initiative and welcomed the idea of increasing awareness and understanding of the Committee 's work. 6 DATE OF NEXT MEETING 6.1. The next regular meeting of the Committee will take place on 9 -11 March 2022. It will be preceded by thematic sessions on conformity assessment procedures, specifically on accreditation and digital solutions . These two thematic sessions will take p lace on 8 March 2022. It is recalled that an informal meeting on the conformity assessment guidelines is scheduled for 10 February 2022. All scheduled dates of meetings in 2022 are listed in JOB/TBT/408/Rev.1 . __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN20_TZA501A1.pdf

s_G_TBTN20_TZA501A1

G/TBT/N/TZA/501/Add.1 20 de diciembre de 2022 (22-9539) Página: 1/1 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 20 de diciembre de 2022 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación de Tanzanía . _______________ Título : Norma del Comité de Normalización de la Dirección de Agricultura y Alimentación A FDC 12 (540) P3, Guava juice - Specification (Zumo [jugo] de guayaba . Especificaciones). Motivo del addendum : [ ] Modificación del plazo para presentar observaciones - fecha: [ ] Adopción de la medida notificada - fecha: [ ] Publicación de la medida notificada - fecha: [X] Entrada en vigor de la medida notificada - fecha : 1 de abril de 2022 [ ] Indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva1: [ ] Retiro o derogación de la medida notificad a - fecha: Signatura pertinente, en el caso de que se vuelva a notificar la medida: [ ] Modificación del contenido o del ámbito de aplicación de la medida notificada e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: Nuevo plazo para presentar observaciones (si procede): [ ] Publicación de documentos interpretativos e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: [ ] Otro motivo: Descripción : Mediante el presente addendum , Tanzanía hace saber a los Miembros de la OMC que el proyecto de Norma de Tanzanía AFDC 12 (540) P3, Zumo (jugo) de guayaba . Especificaciones, que se notificó en el documento G/TBT/N/TZA/501, entró en vigor el 1 de abril de 2022 como Norma de Tanzanía TZS 1196 :2021, Guava juice -Specification (Zumo [jugo] de guayaba . Especificaciones) . Las especificaciones notificadas pueden adquirirse a través del Servicio Nacional de Información OTC, en la dirección nep@tbs.go.tz . __________ 1 Entre otras cosas, puede aportarse la dirección de un sitio web, un anexo en pdf u otra información que indique dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva/modificada y/o documentos interpretativos.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/254745_2019_TBT_ECU_19_3208_00_s.pdf

254745_2019_TBT_ECU_19_3208_00_s

2019 -101 Página 1 de 12 RESOLUCIÓN No. SUBSECRETARÍA DE LA CALIDAD MINISTERIO DE PRODUCCIÓN, COMERCIO EXTERIOR, INVERSIONES Y PESCA CONSIDERANDO: Que, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Artículo 52 de la Constitución de la República del Ecuador, “Las personas tienen derec ho a disponer de bienes y servicios de óptima calidad y a elegirlos con libertad, así como a una información precisa y no engañosa sobre su contenido y características”; Que, el Protocolo de Adhesión de la República del Ecuador al Acuerdo por el que se es tablece la Organización Mundial del Comercio, OMC, se publicó en el Registro Oficial -Suplemento No. 853 del 2 de enero de 1996; Que, el Acuerdo de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio - AOTC de la OMC, en su Artículo 2 establece las disposiciones para la elabo ración, adopción y aplicación de reglamentos técnicos por instituciones del Gobierno Central y su notificación a los demás Miembros; Que, el Anexo 3 del Acuerdo OTC, establece el Código de Buena Conducta para la elaboración, adopción y aplicación de norma s; Que, la Decisión 376 de 1995 de la Comisión de la Comunidad Andina creó el “Sistema Andino de Normalización, Acreditación, Ensayos, Certificación, Reglamentos Técnicos y Metrología” , modificado por la Decisión 419 del 30 de julio de 1997; Que, el artí culo 1 de la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad señala “(…) Esta ley tiene como objetivo establecer el marco jurídico destinado a: i) regular los principios, políticas y entidades relacionados con las actividades vinculadas con la evaluación de la c onformidad, que facilite el cumplimiento de los compromisos internacionales en esta materia; ii) Garantizar el cumplimiento de los derechos ciudadanos relacionados con la seguridad, la protección de la vida y la salud humana, animal y vegetal, la preservac ión del medio ambiente, la protección del consumidor contra prácticas engañosas y la corrección y sanción de estas prácticas; y, iii) Promover e incentivar la cultura de la calidad y el mejoramiento de la competitividad en la sociedad ecuatoriana.” ; Que, de conformidad con el artículo 2 del Acuerdo Ministerial No. 11 256 del 15 de julio de 2011, publicado en el Registro Oficial No. 499 del 26 de julio de 2011; las normas técnicas ecuatorianas, códigos, guías de práctica, manuales y otros documentos técnico s de autoría del INEN deben estar al alcance de todos los ciudadanos sin excepción, a fin de que se divulgue su contenido sin costo; Que, el artículo 2 del Decreto Ejecutivo No. 338 publicado en el Registro Oficial -Suplemento No. 263 del 9 de Junio de 201 4, establece: “Sustitúyanse las denominaciones del Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalización por Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización. (…)” ; Que, mediante Resolución No. 15 097 -A del 13 de marzo de 2015, promulgada en el Registro Oficial -Suplemento No. 469 del 30 de marzo de 2015 se oficializó con el carácter de Obligatorio el reglamento técnico ecuatoriano RTE INEN 226 “Válvulas para uso industrial ”, el mismo que entró en vigencia el 13 de abril de 2015 ; Que, el Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización, INEN, de acuerdo a las funciones determinadas en el literal b) del artículo 15, literal b) de la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad, manifiest a: “b) Formular, en sus áreas de competencia, luego de los análisis técnicos respectivos, las propuestas de norm as, reglamentos técnicos y procedimientos de evaluación de la conformidad, los planes de 2019 -101 Página 2 de 12 trabajo, así como las propuestas de las normas y procedimientos metrológicos;(…)” ha formulado el proyecto de Primera Revisión del reglamento técnico ecuatoriano , PRTE INEN 226 (1R) “Válvulas para uso industrial” ; Que, en conformidad con numeral 2.9.2 del artículo 2 del Acuerdo de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio de la OMC y, el artículo 12 de la Decisión 827 de la Comisión de la Comunidad Andina, CAN, se Notificará a través de la Secretaría General correspondiente el mencionado proyecto de reglamento técnico ; Que, el inciso primero del artículo 29 de la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad manifiesta: “La reglamentación técnica comprende la elaboración, adopción y aplicación de reglamentos técnicos necesarios para precautelar los objetivos relacionados con la seguridad, la salud de la vida humana, animal y vegetal, la preservación del medio ambiente y la protección del consumidor contra prácticas engañosas ”; Que, mediante Resolución COMEX No. 020 -2017 del Comité de Comercio Exterior, entró en vigencia a partir del 01 de septiembre de 2017 la reforma íntegra del Arancel del Ecuador; Que, la Decisión 827 de 18 de julio de 2018 de la Comisión de la Comunidad Andina establece los “Lineamientos para la elaboración, adopción y aplicación de reglamentos técnicos y los procedimientos de evaluación de la conformidad en los Países Miembros de la Comunidad Andina y a nivel comunitario ”; Que, mediante Acuerdo Ministerial 18 152 del 09 de octubre de 201 8, el Ministro de Industrias y Productividad encargado, dispone a la Subsecretaría del Sistema de la Calidad, en coordinación con el Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización – INEN y el Servicio de Acreditación Ecuatoriano – SAE, r ealizar un análisis y mejorar los reglamentos técnicos ecuatorianos RTE INEN; así como, los proyectos de reglamentos que se encuentran en etapa de notificación, a fin de determinar si cumplen con los legítimos objetivos planteados al momento de su emisión; Que, por Decreto Ejecutivo No. 559 vigente a partir del 14 de noviembre de 2018, publicado en el Registro Oficial -Suplemento No. 387 del 13 de diciembre de 2018, en su artículo 1 se decreta “Fusiónese por absorción al Ministerio de Comercio Exterior e In versiones las siguientes instituciones: el Ministerio de Industrias y Productividad, el Instituto de Promoción de Exportaciones e Inversiones Extranjeras, y el Ministerio de Acuacultura y Pesca” ; y en su artículo 2 dispone “Una vez concluido el proceso de fusión por absorción, modifíquese la denominación del Ministerio de Comercio Exterior e Inversiones a Ministerio de Producción, Comercio Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca” ; Que, en la normativa ibidem en su artículo 3 dispone “Una vez concluido el proceso de fusión por absorción, todas las competencias, atribuciones, funciones, representaciones, y delegaciones constantes en leyes, decretos, reglamentos, y demás normativa vigente, que le correspondían al Ministerio de Industrias y Productividad, al Instituto de Promoción de Exportaciones e Inversiones Extranjeras y, al Ministerio de Acuacultura y Pesca, serán asumidas por el Ministerio de Producción, Comercio Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca”; Que, el literal f) del artículo 17 de la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad , establece que “ En relación con el INEN, corresponde al Ministerio de Industrias y Productividad; (…) f) aprobar las propuestas de normas o reglamentos técnicos y procedimientos de evaluación de la conformidad, en el ámbito de su competencia. ( …)”, en consecuencia, es competente para aprobar y oficializar con el carácter de Obligatorio , la Primera Revisión del reglamento técnico ecuatoriano , RTE INEN 226 (1R) “Válvulas para uso industrial” ; mediante su publicación en el Registro Oficial, a fin de que exista un justo equilibrio de intereses entre proveedores y consumidores; Que, mediante Acuerdo Ministerial No. 11 446 del 25 de noviembre de 2011, publicado en el Registro Oficial No. 599 del 19 de diciembre de 2 011, se delega a la Subsecretarí a de la Calidad la facultad de aprobar y oficializar las propuestas de normas o reglamentos técnicos y 2019 -101 Página 3 de 12 procedimientos de evaluación de la conformidad propuestos por el INEN en el ámbito de su competencia de conformidad con lo previsto en la Ley del Sistema Ecu atoriano de la Calidad y en su Reglamento General; y, En ejercicio de las facultades que le concede la Ley, RESUELVE: ARTÍCULO 1. - Notificar el proyecto de Primera R evisión del: REGLAMENTO TÉCNICO ECUATORIANO PRTE INEN 226 (1R) “VÁLVULAS PARA USO IND USTRIAL” 1. OBJETO 1.1 Este reglamento técnico ecuatoriano establece los requisitos que deben cumplir las válvulas para uso industrial, previamente a la comercialización de productos nacionales e importados, con el propósito de proteger la seguridad de las personas, así como prevenir prácticas que puedan inducir a error. 2. CAMPO DE APLICACIÓN 2.1 Este reglamento técnico se aplica a los productos: 2.1.1 Válvulas industriales con extremos bridados, roscados, con extremos para soldar, así como las vá lvulas tipo oblea y las válvulas sin bridas, fabricadas por procesos de fundición o forja. 2.1.2 Válvulas de bola, retención (check), compuerta y obturación destinadas a ser utilizadas en sistemas de tuberías en industrias de petróleo y gas natural. 2.2 Los productos que son objeto de aplicación de este reglamento técnico se encuentran comprendidos en la siguiente clasificación arancelaria: Clasificación Código Designación del producto/mercancía Observaciones 84.81 Artículos de grifería y órganos simil ares para tuberías, calderas, depósitos, cubas o continentes similares, incluidas las válvulas reductoras de presión y las válvulas termostáticas. 8481.10.00.00 - Válvulas reductoras de presión Aplica a los productos/mercancías citados en el campo de apl icación del reglamento técnico RTE INEN 226 (1R); y, se debe tomar en cuenta las exclusiones citadas en este reglamento técnico. 8481.30.00.00 - Válvulas de retención 8481.80 - Los demás artículos de grifería y órganos similares: 8481.80.40.00 - - Válvulas esféricas 2019 -101 Página 4 de 12 - - Válvulas de compuerta de diámetro nominal inferior o igual a 100 mm: 8481.80.51.00 - - - Para presiones superiores o iguales a 13,8 MPa Aplica a los productos/mercancías citados en el campo de aplic ación del reglamento técnico RTE INEN 226 (1R); y, se debe tomar en cuenta las exclusiones citadas en este reglamento técnico. 8481.80.59.00 - - - Los demás 8481.80.60.00 - - Las demás válvulas de compuerta 8481.80.70.00 - - Válvulas de globo de diámetro nominal inferior o igual a 100 mm. 8481.80.99.00 - - - Los demás 2.3 Este reglamento técnico no aplica a: 2.3.1 Válvulas reductoras de presión para uso con agua, o GLP. 3. DEFINICIONES 3.1 Para efectos de aplicación de este reglamento técnico se adoptan las definiciones contempladas en las normas ISO 7121, ISO 10434, ISO 14313, ISO 15761, ISO 17292, EN 1983, EN 1984, EN 12516 -1, EN 12516 -2, EN 12516 -3, EN 12516 -4, EN 13547, EN 13789, EN 16767, API 6D, API 600, API 602, ASME B16.34, EN 736 -1, EN 736 -2, EN 736 -3 y, las que a continuación se detallan : 3.1.1 Certificado de conformidad. Documento emitido conforme a las reglas de un esquema o sistema de certificación, en el cual se puede confiar razonablemente que un producto, proceso o servicio debidamente identificado está conf orme con un reglamento técnico, norma técnica u otra especificación técnica o documento normativo específico. 3.1.2 Consumidor. Toda persona natural o jurídica que como destinatario final adquiera, utilice o disfrute bienes o servicios. Cuando el p resente reglamento mencione al c onsumidor, dicha denominación incluirá al u suario. 3.1.3 Distribuidores o comerciantes. Las personas naturales o jurídicas que de manera habitual venden o proveen al por mayor o al detal, bienes destinados finalmente a los consumi dores, aun cuando ello no se desarrolle en establecimientos abiertos al público. 3.1.4 Embalaje. Es la protección al envase y al producto mediante un material adecuado con el objeto de protegerlo de daños físicos y agentes exteriores, facilitando de este modo su manipulación durante el transporte y almacenamiento. 3.1.5 Empaque o envase. Todo material primario o secundario que contiene o recubre al producto hasta su entrega al consumidor, con la finalidad de protegerlo del deterioro y facilitar su manipul ación. 3.1.6 Importador. Persona natural o jurídica que de manera habitual importa bienes para su venta o provisión en otra forma al interior del territorio nacional. 3.1.7 Indeleble. Que no se puede borrar. 3.1.8 Inspección. Examen de un producto proc eso, servicio, o instalación o su diseño y determinación de su conformidad con requisitos específicos o, sobre la base del juicio profesional, con requisitos generales. 2019 -101 Página 5 de 12 3.1.9 Límite aceptable de calidad (AQL). Nivel de calidad que es el peor promedio tole rable del proceso cuando se envía una serie continua de lotes para muestreo de aceptación. 3.1.10 Marca o nombre comercial. Cualquier signo que sea apto para distinguir productos en el mercado. 3.1.11 Marca de conformidad de tercera parte. Marca protegid a, emitida por un organismo que realiza la evaluación de la conformidad de tercera parte, que indica que un objeto de evaluación de la conformidad (un producto, un proceso, una persona, un sistema o un organismo) es conforme con los requisitos especificado s 3.1.1 2 Organismo Acreditado. Organismo de evaluación de la conformidad que ha demostrado competencia técnica a una entidad de acreditación, para la ejecución de actividades de evaluación de la conformidad, a través del cumplimiento con normativas intern acionales y exigencias de la entidad de acreditación. 3.1.1 3 Organismo Designado . Laboratorio de ensayo, Organismo de Certificación u Organismo de inspección, que ha sido autorizado por el Ministerio de Producción, Comercio Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca ( MPCEIP) conforme lo establecido por l a Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad, para que lleve a cabo actividades específicas de evaluación de la conformidad. 3.1.1 4 Organismo Reconocido . Es un organismo de evaluación de la conformidad con competencia e n pruebas de ensayo o calibración, inspección o certificación de producto, acreditado por un Organismo de Acreditación que es signatario del Foro Internacional de Acreditación (IAF) y del Acuerdo de Reconocimiento Multilateral (MLA) de IAF, los productos d e evaluación de la conformidad de estos organismos, deben ser aceptados por todos los demás signatarios del MLA de IAF, con el alcance adecuado. 3.1.15 País de origen . País de fabricación, producción o elaboración del producto. 3.1.16 Productores o fabricantes. Las personas naturales o jurídicas que extraen, industrializan o transforman bienes intermedios o finales para su provisión a los consumidores. 3.1.17 Válvula de compuerta . Válvula en la que el movimiento del obturador es lineal y, en la zona de asiento, está en ángulo recto con la dirección del fluido. 3.1.18 Válvula de globo . Válvula en la que el movimiento del obturador es lineal y, en la zona de asiento, está en la dirección del fluido. 3.1.19 Válvulas de obturador giratorio y válvulas esféri cas. Válvula en la que el obturador gira en torno a un eje en ángulo recto a la dirección del fluido y, cuando está abierto, el fluido pasa por el obturador. 4. REQUISITOS 4.1 Requisitos de producto. Los productos objeto de este reglamento técnico debe n cumplir como mínimo los requisitos establecidos en la tabla 1. 2019 -101 Página 6 de 12 Tabla 1. Requisitos y métodos de ensayo Producto Requisitos Norma de requisitos Válvulas para uso industrial Válvulas para uso industrial  Requisitos de resistencia mecánica  Requisitos de presión EN 12516 -1 o EN 12516 -2 o EN 12516 -3 o EN 12516 -4 o ASME B16.34 Válvulas esféricas de uso industrial  Resistencia mecánica de la envolvente  Relaciones presión -temperatura EN 1983 o EN 13547 Válvulas de compuerta de acero  Relaciones presión -tempera tura  Resistencia de la envolvente EN 1984 Válvulas de globo de fundición  Relaciones presión -temperatura  Resistencia mecánica de la carcasa EN 13789 Válvulas de retención de acero y fundición  Resistencia de diseño de la carcasa  Clasificación por presión/t emperatura EN 16767 Válvulas de tipo bola de acero para aplicaciones industriales de uso general  Clasificación por presión/temperatura ISO 7121 Válvulas para uso en industrias de petróleo y gas natural Válvulas para uso industrial tales como las válvula s de bola, retención (check), compuerta y obturación  Clasificación por presión/temperatura ISO 14313 o API 6D Válvulas de compuerta de acero con bonete atornillado  Clasificación por presión/temperatura API 602 o ISO 15761 Válvulas compuerta, globo y retención para tamaños de DN100 y menores  Clasificación por presión/temperatura API 602 o ISO 15761 Válvulas de bola metálicas  Requisitos de presión ISO 17292 5. REQUISITOS DE ENVASE, EMPAQUE Y ROTULADO O ETIQUETADO 5.1 La información de rotulado se debe presentar en un lugar visible, marcado de forma permanente e indeleble con caracteres claros y fáciles de leer, en idioma español, sin perjuicio de que se puedan presentar en otros idiomas adicionales. 5.2 Los productos objeto de este reglamento técnic o deben contener la información de marcado en el producto . 5.3 El marcado y la información suministrada por el fabricante para los productos objeto de este reglamento técnico deben contener como mínimo la siguiente información y la establecida en la tabla 2. 5.3.1 Nombre o razón social e identificación fiscal (RUC) del fabricante o del importador (ver nota1). 5.3.2 País de origen. 5.3.3 Marca o nombre comercial. Nota1: Fabricante para los productos nacionales; i mportador para productos importados. Información a incluir directamente o a través de etiquetas en el producto o empaque o envase. 2019 -101 Página 7 de 12 Tabla 2. Requisitos de marcado Producto Norma Requisito de marcado Válvulas para uso industrial EN 12516 -1 o, 12. Marcado 12.1 Válvulas con relaciones estándar 12.2 Válvulas con relaciones especiales 12.3 Válvulas de clase limitada 12.4 válvulas con relaciones intermedias EN 12516 -2 o, 13. Marcado Las envolventes de válvula diseñadas para una presión específica y una temperatura asociada o para un rango de presiones específicas para temperaturas asociadas se deben marcar de acuerdo con la norma EN 19. ASME B16.34 4.2 Marcado de identificación 4.3 Placa de identificación Válvulas esférica s de acero EN 1983 o, 8.1 Marcado EN 13547 8.1 Marcados obligatorios Válvulas de compuerta de acero EN 1984 8.1 Marcado Válvulas de globo de fundición EN 13789 8.1 Marcado Válvulas de retención de acero y fundición EN 16767 8.1 Marcado Válvulas de t ipo bola de acero para aplicaciones industriales de uso general ISO 7121 7.2 marcado en el cuerpo 7.3 marcado de uniones 7.4 Placa de identificación Válvulas para uso industrial tales como las válvulas de bola, retención (check), compuerta y obturación ISO 14313 o, 13. Marcado API 6D 11. Marcado Válvulas de compuerta de acero con bonete atornillado ISO 15761 o, 7.2 Marcado de cuerpo 7.3 marcado de uniones 7.4 Marcado de placa de identificación API 602 7.2 Marcado de cuerpo 7.3 marcado de uniones 7.4 Marcado de placa de identificación Válvulas compuerta, globo y retención para tamaños de DN100 y menores ISO 15761 o, 7.2 Marcado de cuerpo 7.3 marcado de uniones 7.4 Marcado de placa de identificación API 602 7.2 Marcado de cuerpo 7.3 marcado de unione s 7.4 Marcado de placa de identificación Válvulas de bola metálicas ISO 17292 7.2 Marcado de cuerpo 7.3 Marcado de uniones 7.4 Placa de identificación 2019 -101 Página 8 de 12 6. DOCUMENTOS DE REFERENCIA 6.1 Norma ISO 2859 -1:1999+Amd 1:2011, Procedimientos de muestreo para in spección por atributos. Parte 1. Programas de muestreo clasificados por el nivel aceptable de calidad (AQL) para inspección lote a lote. 6.2 Norma ISO 7121:2016, Steel ball valves for general -purpose industrial applications . 6.3 Norma ISO 10434:2004, Bolted bonnet steel gate valves for the petroleum, petrochemical and allied industries . 6.4 Norma ISO 14313:2007, Petroleum and natural gas industries — Pipeline transportation systems — Pipeline valves . 6.5 Norma ISO 15761:2002, Steel gate, globe and check valves for sizes DN 100 and smaller, for the petroleum and natural gas industries . 6.6 Norma ISO 17292:2015, Metal ball valves for petroleum, petrochemical and allied industries . 6.7 Norma ISO/IEC 17025:2006 , Requisitos generales para la competencia de laboratorios de calibración y ensayo. 6.8 Norma ISO/IEC 17050 -1:2006 , Evaluación de la Conformidad – Declaración de la conformidad del proveedor. Parte 1: Requisitos Generales . 6.9 Norma ISO/IEC 17067 , Evaluación de la conformidad. Fundamentos de certif icación de productos y directrices aplicables a los esquemas de certificación de producto. 6.10 Norma EN 736 -1:2018 , Válvulas. Terminología. Parte 1: Definición de los tipos de válvulas 6.11 Norma EN 736 -2:2016, Válvulas. Terminología. Parte 2: Definició n de los componentes de las válvulas. 6.12 Norma EN 736 -3:2008 , Válvulas. Terminología. Parte 3: Definición de términos. 6.13 Norma EN 1983:2013, Industrial valves. Steel ball valves. 6.14 Norma EN 1984:2010, Industrial valves. Steel gate valves. 6.15 Norma EN 12516 -1:2014, Industrial valves - Shell design strength - Part 1: Tabulation method for steel valve shells . 6.16 Norma EN 12516 -2:2014, Industrial valves - Shell design strength - Part 2: Calculation method for steel valve shells . 6.17 Norma EN 12516 -3:2002, Valves - Shell design strength - Part 3: Experimental method . 6.18 Norma EN 12516 -4:2014, Industrial valves - Shell design strength - Part 4: Calculation method for valve shells manufactured in metallic materials other than steel . 6.19 Norm a EN 13547:2013, Industrial valves –Copper alloy ball valves . 6.20 Norma EN 13789:2010, Industrial valves –Cast iron globe valves . 6.21 Norma EN 16767:2016, Válvulas industriales. Válvulas antirretornos de acero y de fundición. 2019 -101 Página 9 de 12 6.22 Norma API 6D:2008 , Industrias de petróleo y gas natural. Sistema de transporte por tuberías – Válvulas de tubería. 6.23 Noma API 600:2015 , Válvulas de compuerta de acero con bonete atornillado utilizadas en industrias de petróleo y gas natural. 6.24 Norma API 602:2009 , Válvul as de compuerta, globo y retención para tamaños de DN 100 (NPS 4) y menores para industrias de petróleo y gas natural. 6.25 Norma ASME B16.34:2017 , Valves -Flanged, Threaded, and welding end. 7. PROCEDIMIENTO ADMINISTRATIVO 7.1 La demostración de la c onformidad con los reglamentos técnicos ecuatorianos, mediante la aplicación de Acuerdos de Reconocimiento Mutuo, Convenios de Facilitación al Comercio o cualquier otro instrumento legal que el Ecuador haya suscrito con algún país y que éste haya sido ratificado, debe ser evidenciada aplicando las disposiciones establecidas en estos acuerdos. Los fabricantes, importadores, distribuidores o comercializadores deben asegurarse que el producto cumpla en todo momento con los requisitos establecidos en el reglam ento técnico ecuatoriano. Los expedientes con las evidencias de tales cumplimientos deben ser mantenidos en poder del fabricante, importador, distribuidor o comercializador por el plazo establecido en la legislación ecuatoriana. 8. PROCEDIMIENTO DE EVAL UACIÓN DE LA CONFORMIDAD (PEC) 8.1 De conformidad con lo que establece la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad, previamente a la comercialización de productos nacionales e importados sujetos a reglamentación técnica, deberá demostrarse su cumplimien to a través de un certificado de conformidad de producto expedido por un organismo de certificación de producto acreditado o designado en el país, o por aquellos que se hayan emitido en relación a los acuerdos vigentes de reconocimiento mutuo con el país, en conformidad a lo siguiente: 8.1.1 Inspección y muestreo. Para verificar la conformidad de los productos con el presente reglamento técnico, se debe realizar el muestr eo de acuerdo a: La norma técnica aplicada en el numeral 4 del presente reglamento té cnico; o, con el plan de muestreo establecido en la norma ISO 2859 -1, para un nivel de inspección especial S -1, inspección simple normal y un AQL=4%; o, según los procedimientos establecidos por el organismo de certificación de producto, acreditado, design ado o reconocido; o, de acuerdo a lo establecido por la autoridad competente. 8.1.2 Presentación del Certificado de Conformidad de producto. Emitido por un organismo de certificación de producto acreditado, designado o reconocido para el presente reglamen to técnico o normativa técnica equivalente. 8.2 Los fabricantes nacionales e importadores de productos contemplados en el campo de aplicación deben demostrar el cumplimiento con los requisitos establecidos en este reglamento técnico o normativa técnica eq uivalente, a través de la presentación del certificado de conformidad de producto según las siguientes opciones: 8.2.1 Certificado de conformidad de producto según el Esquema de Certificación 1a, establecido en la norma ISO/IEC 17067, emitido por un organ ismo de certificación de produ cto, de acuerdo con el numeral 8 .1 de este reglamento técnico. 2019 -101 Página 10 de 12 8.2.2 Certificado de Conformidad de producto según el Esquema de Certificación 1b (lote), establecido en la norma ISO/IEC 17067, emitido por un organismo de cert ificación de producto, de acuerdo con el numeral 8.1 de este reglamento técnico 8.2.3 Certificado de Conformidad de producto según el Esquema de Certificación 5 , establecido en la norma ISO/IEC 17067, emitido por un organismo de certificación de producto, de acuerdo con el numeral 8 .1 de este reglamento técnico. Los productos que cuenten con Sello de Calidad INEN (Esquema de Certificación 5), no están sujetos al requisito de certificado de conformidad para su comercialización. 8.2.4 Declaración de conform idad del proveedor (Certificado de Conformidad de Primera Parte) según la norma ISO/IEC 17050 -1, emitido por el fabricante, importador, distribuidor o comercializador. Con esta declaración de conformidad, el declarante se responsabiliza de que haya real izado por su cuenta las inspecciones y ensayos requeridos por este reglamento técnico que le han permitido verificar su cumplimiento. Este documento debe ser real y auténtico, de faltar a la verdad asume las consecuencias legales. La declaración de conform idad del proveedor debe estar sustentad a con la presentación de informes de ensayos o certificados de marca de conformidad, de acuerdo con las siguientes alternativas: 8.2.4.1 Informe de ensayos del producto emitido por un laboratorio acreditado, cuya acr editación sea emitida o reconocida por el SAE, que demuestre la conformidad del producto con este reglamento técnico, cuya fecha de emisión no debe exceder un año a la fecha de presentación; o, 8.2.4.2 Informe de ensayos del producto emitido por un labora torio de tercera parte que evidencie competencia técnica según la norma ISO/IEC 17025, y tenga alcance para realizar los ensayos que demuestren la conformidad del producto con este reglamento técnico, cuya fecha de emisión no debe exceder un año a la fecha de presentación; o, 8.2.4.3 Certificado de Marca de conformidad de producto con las normas de referencia de este reglamento técnico, emitido por un organismo de certificación de producto que se puedan verificar o evidenciar por cualquier medio. La marca de conformidad de producto deberá estar en el producto. Para el numeral 8.2.4, se debe adjuntar el informe de cumplimiento con los requisitos de etiquetado , marcado e indicaciones para el uso del producto, establecido en el presente reglamento técnico, em itido por el fabricante, importador , distribuidor u organismo de inspección. 8.3 Los certificados e informes deben estar en idioma español o inglés, sin perjuicio de que pueda estar en otros idiomas adicionales. 9. AUTORIDAD DE FISCALIZACIÓN Y/O SUPERVI SIÓN 9.1 De conformidad con lo que establece la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad, el Ministerio de Producción, Comercio Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca (MPCEIP) y, las instituciones del Estado que en función de sus leyes constitutivas tengan facul tades de fiscalización y supervisión, son las autoridades competentes para efectuar las labores de vigilancia y control del cumplimiento de los requisitos del presente reglamento técnico, y demandarán de los fabricantes nacionales e importadores de los pro ductos contemplados en este reglamento técnico, la presentación de los certificados de conformidad respectivos. 9.2 La autoridad de fiscalización y/o supervisión se reserva el derecho de verificar el cumplimiento del presente reglamento técnico, en cualqu ier momento de acuerdo con lo establecido en el numeral del Procedimiento de Evaluación de la Conformidad (PEC). 2019 -101 Página 11 de 12 Cuando se requiera verificar el cumplimiento de los requisitos del presente reglamento técnico, los costos por inspección o ensayo que se gene ren por la utilización de los servicios, de un organismo de evaluación de la conformidad acreditado por el SAE o, designado por el MPCEIP serán asumidos por el fabricante, si el producto es nacional, o por el importador, si el producto es importado. 10. FISCALIZACIÓN Y/O SUPERVISIÓN 10.1 Las instituciones del Estado, en función de sus competencias, evaluarán la conformidad con los reglamentos técnicos según lo establecido en los procedimientos de evaluación de la conformidad; para lo cual podrán utiliza r organismos de certificación, de inspección y laboratorios de ensayo acreditados o designados por los organismos competentes. 10.2 Con el propósito de desarrollar y ejecutar actividades de vigilancia del mercado, la Ministra o el Ministro de Producción, Comercio Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca podrá disponer a las instituciones que conforman el Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad, elaboren los respectivos programas de evaluación de la conformidad en el ámbito de sus competencias, ya sea de manera individual o coordinada entre sí. 10.3 Las autoridades de fiscalización y/o supervisión ejercerán sus funciones de manera independiente, imparcial y objetiva, y dentro del ámbito de sus competencias. 11. RÉGIMEN DE SANCIONES 11.1 Los fabricantes, importadores, distribuidores o comercializadores de estos productos que incumplan con lo establecido en este reglamento técnico recibirán las sanciones previstas en la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad, su reglamento general y demás leyes vigentes, según el ries go que implique para los usuarios y la gravedad del incumplimiento. 11.2 Los organismos de certificación, inspección, laboratorios o demás instancias que hayan extendido certificados de conformidad, inspección o informes de ensayos o calibración erróneos o que hayan adulterado deliberadamente los datos de los ensayos o calibraciones emitidos por el laboratorio o, de los certificados, tendrán responsabilidad administrativa, civil, penal y/o fiscal de acuerdo con lo establecido en la Ley del Sistema Ecuatori ano de la Calidad y demás leyes vigentes. 12. REVISIÓN Y ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL REGLAMENTO TÉCNICO 12.1 Con el fin de mantener actualizadas las disposiciones de este reglamento técnico ecuatoriano, el Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización, INEN, lo revisar á en un plazo no mayor a cinco (5) años contados a partir de la fecha de su entrada en vigencia, para incorporar avances tecnológicos o requisitos adicionales de seguridad para la protección de la salud, la vida y el ambiente, de conformidad con lo estable cido en la Ley del Sistema Ecuatoriano de la Calidad. ARTÍCULO 2. - Disponer al Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización, INEN, publique la Primera Revisión del reglamento técnico ecuatoriano, RTE INEN 226 (1R) “Válvulas para uso industrial” en la página web de esa Institución ( www.normalizacion.gob.ec ). 2019 -101 Página 12 de 12 ARTÍCULO 3. - El presente reglamento técnico ecuatoriano RTE INEN 226 (Primera Revisión) reemplaza al RTE INEN 226:2015 y, entrará en vigencia transcurrido el plazo de seis (6) meses contados a partir del dí a siguiente de su publicación en el Registro Oficial. COMUNÍQUESE Y PUB LÍQUESE en el Registro Oficial. Dado en Quito, Distrito Metropolitano, Mgs. Armin Pazmiño Silva SUBSECRETARIO DE LA CALIDAD

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_IP_N_1GBR109.pdf

s_IP_N_1GBR109

IP/N/1/GBR/109 IP/N/1/GBR/C/26 11 de febrero de 2021 (21-1148) Página: 1/2 Consejo de los Aspectos de los Derechos de Propiedad Intelectual relacionados con el Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN DE LEYES Y REGLAMENTOS DE CONFORMIDAD CON EL ARTÍCULO 63.2 DEL ACUERDO SOBRE LOS ADPIC REINO UNIDO : ORDEN DE 1999 (DISPOSICIONES COMPLEMENTARIAS Y CONSECUENTES) RELATIVA A LA LEY DE SALUD DE 1999 , SI 1999/2795 Miembro que presenta la notificación REINO UNIDO Información sobre el texto jurídico notificado Título Orden de 1999 (disposiciones complementarias y consecuentes) relativa a la Ley de Salud de 1999, SI 1999/2795 Materia Derecho de autor y derechos conexos Naturaleza de la notificación Principales leyes o reglamentos dedicados a la propiedad intelectual Otras leyes o reglamentos Enlace al texto jurídico* https://ip -documents.info/2021/IP/GBR/21_0878_00_e.pdf Situación de la notificación Primera notificación Modificación o revisión del texto jurídico notificado Sustitución o refundición del/de los texto(s) jurídico(s) notificado(s) Referencias de notificaciones anteriores IP/N/1/GBR/C/1 Breve descripción del texto jurídico notificado Esta Orden introduce modificaciones a algunas leyes e instrumentos normativos consecuentes o complementarios a las disposiciones de la Ley de Salud de 1999 (" la Ley de 1999") que entraron en vigor en virtud de l a Orden de 1999 relativa a la Ley de Salud d e 1999 (decreto de entrada en vigor N° 5) ( S.I. 1999/2793 (c ap. 69)). En particular, introduce modificaciones como consecuencia del establecimiento de la Co misión para la Mejora de la Salud con arreglo al artículo 19 de la Ley . Idioma(s) del texto jurídico notificado Inglés Entrada en vigor 1 de noviembre de 1999 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/2795/made Otra fecha IP/N/1/GBR/109 • IP/N/1/GBR/C/26 - 2 - Información sobre la notificación Fecha de presentación de la notificación 2 de febrero de 2021 Otra información https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/2795/article/3/made Organismo o autoridad responsable UK Intellectual Property Office (Oficina de la Propiedad Intelectual del Reino Unido) Concept House Cardiff Road Newport South Wales NP10 8QQ Reino Unido information@ipo.gov.uk 0300 300 2000 Desde fuera del Reino Unido: +44 (0)1633 814000 * Se facilitan enlaces a los textos de las leyes y los reglamentos notificados en el marco del Acuerdo sobre los ADPIC según los proporcionó el Miembro en cuestión; la Secretaría de la OMC no suscribe ni revisa su contenido.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_OFFICE_19_102.pdf

r_OFFICE_19_102

OFFICE( 19)/102 19-8303 La politique de recrutement de l'OMC vise à attirer et à retenir les fonctionnaires possédant le plus haut niveau de compétence, d'efficacité et d'intégrité. En tant qu'employeur garantissant l'égalité des chances, l'OMC tient pleinement compte du mérite et de la diversité. ______________________________________________________________________ Avis de vacance n°: EXT/F/19 -72 Date de publication : 2 décembre 2019 Titre: Assistant au service de documentation et d'information Date de clôture: 6 janvier 2020 Classe: 3 Division: Services linguistiques, documentation et gestion de l'information Type de contrat: Durée déterminée Traitement de départ: 60 253 CHF net par an (approximatif) Durée: Deux ans avec possibilité de prolongation Autres conditions Conformément au Statut du personnel et au Règlement du personnel de l'OMC ainsi qu'au Statut du Régime des pensions de l'OMC. L'Organisation mondiale du commerce offre un ensemble de prestations intéressant comprenant un traitement net annuel (soumis à des prélèvements obligatoires pour les cotisations au titre des pensions et de l'assurance santé), des prestations familiales, un régime des pensions, un régime d'assurance santé, une indemnité de cessation de service et 30 jours de congé annuel. Les fonctionnaires qui sont recrutés sur le plan international peuvent bénéficier du remboursement des frais de voyage et de déménagement à l'occasion de l'engagement et de la cessation de service, d'une prime d'installation, d'indemnités pour frais d'études, d'une allocation -logement et de congés dans les foyers. Des renseignements complémentaires sur les prestatio ns offertes figurent sur le site Web de l'OMC: https://www.wto.org/french/thewto_f/vacan_f/compensation_f.htm . La Division des services linguistiques, de la documentation et de la gestion de l'information cherche un fonctionnaire de classe 3 pour exercer les fonctions d'assistant au Service de documentation et d'information à la Section de la création graphique, de l'impression et de la distribution des documents. Fonctions générales Relevant du coordonnateur de l'unité, le titulaire s'acquittera de toutes les tâches relatives à la préparation des documents pour les réunions et à la fourniture d'informations de caractère général. Les responsabilités comprennent les suivantes: 1. Faire office de premier point de contact au bureau d'information , aider les délégués, le personnel du Secrétariat et d'autres personnes autorisées pour les questions relatives à la documentation de l'OMC et leur fournir d'autres informations de caractère général . 2. Préparer les documents pour les réunions conformément aux droits d'accès établis . 3. Vérifier et classer tous les documents courants de l'OMC dans les trois langues, conformément aux procédures établies . OFFICE( 19)/102 - 2 - 4. Distribuer la documentation des délégations en utilisant les casiers et appliquer les procédures et vérifications nécessaires pour traiter les documents sensibles. 5. Maintenir des statistiques à jour sur les documents et séries de documents demandés et tra ités. QUALIFICATIONS REQUISES Études Études secondaires complètes . Connaissances et compétences Connaissances et compétences techniques: Maîtrise de l'utilisation des moteurs de recherche documentaire pour répondre aux demandes spécifiques des délégations, du personnel du Secrétariat et des visiteurs. Expertise dans l'utilisation d'Excel et d'Acrobat. La maîtrise de l'utilisation des ordinateurs et des imprimantes numériques serait un avantage. Compétences comportementales: Excellentes compétences en matière de communication et de relations interpersonnelles et aptitude à travailler en équipe; aptitude à établir des priorités, à respecter des délais stricts, ainsi qu'à accomplir des tâches multiples; capacité à travailler harmon ieusement dans un environnement multiculturel et à faire preuve de tact et de discrétion. Expérience professionnelle Au moins trois ans d'expérience pertinente. Langues Maîtrise de l'anglais , du français et de l'espagnol , à l'oral comme à l'écrit (niveau correspondant ou équivalant au minimum au niveau C1 d'après le Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues (CECR)). Il sera demandé aux candidats présélectionnés de donner la preuve de leurs compétences linguistiques au titre d'un système reconnu (par exemple CECR, IELTS, etc.), à moins que la langue exigée soit leur langue maternelle. Les candidats présélectionnés ne pouvant fournir de preuves de leurs aptitudes linguistiques seront soumis à une évaluation dans le cadre du processu s de sélection. Renseignements complémentaires Seules seront acceptées les candidatures de ressortissants des Membres de l'OMC. L'OMC pourra utiliser divers moyens de communication tels que vidéo ou téléconférence pour juger et évaluer les candidats. Le processus de recrutement pourra aussi nécessiter l'utilisation de diverses formes de tests, centres d'évaluation, entretiens et vérifications des références. Les candidats qui, bien que n'ayant pas été retenus, auront montré lors du processu s de sélection qu'ils sont aptes à occuper un poste similaire pourront figurer sur une liste de réserve pendant 12 mois au maximum , et être contactés ultérieurement si des ressources additionnelles s'avèrent nécessaires. OFFICE( 19)/102 - 3 - ___________________________________ ___________________________________ LES CANDIDATS PEUVENT ÊTRE APPELÉS À PASSER UN EXAMEN ÉCRIT ______________________________________________________________________ LES CANDIDATS RETENUS POUR UN ENTRETIEN SERONT CONTACTÉS DIRECTEMENT ____________________ __________________________________________________ Veuillez noter que tous les candidats doivent remplir un formulaire de candidature en ligne. Pour postuler, veuillez vous rendre sur le site Web du système de recrutement électronique de l'OMC à l'adresse: https://erecruitment.wto.org . Vous y trouverez des instructions concernant la procédure à suivre. Tous les candidats sont invités à poser leur candidature en ligne dès que possible après la parution de l'avis de vacance et bien avant la date de clôture – heure de Genève (Suisse) – indiquée dans l'avis de vacance. VEUILLEZ NOTER QUE LES CANDIDATURES R EÇUES APRÈS LA DATE LIMITE NE SERONT PAS ACCEPTÉES L'OMC est une organisation sans tabac.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_ECU374R1.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_ECU374R1

G/TBT/N/ECU/374/Rev.1 3 de junio de 2020 (20-3958) Página: 1/3 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN Revisión Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica: ECUADOR Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable: Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización INEN Calle Baquerizo Moreno E8 -29 y Diego de Almagro Teléfono: (+593 -2) 3825960 al 90 Página WEB: www.normalizacion.gob.ec Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios Web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad difere nte: Subsecretaría de Calidad Ministerio de Producción, Comercio, Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca (MPCEIP) Dirección: Av. Amazonas entre Unión Nacional de Periodistas y Alfonso Pereira, Piso 8, Bloque amarillo Teléfono: (+593 2) 3948760 Ext. 2254 - 2272 Correo electrónico: puntocontactoOTCECU@produccion.gob.ec puntocontactoOTCECU@gmail.com cyepez@produccion.gob.ec jsanchezc@produccion.gob.ec Página WEB: www.produccion.gob.ec 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de : 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda; en otro caso partida del arancel nacional. Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): 701349 - - Los demás; Vaji lla y demás artículos de uso doméstico y artículos de higiene o tocador, de plástico (HS 3924); - Los demás (HS 401490); Equipo doméstico para los niños (ICS 97.190) 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado: Proyecto de Segunda Re visión del Reglamento Técnico Ecuatoriano PRTE INEN 065 (2R) "Chupetes y artículos de puericultura para la alimentación líquida de bebés y niños pequeños" (14 página(s), en Español) G/TBT/N/ECU/374/Rev.1 - 2 - 6. Descripción del contenido: Este reglamento técnico establece los requi sitos que deben cumplir los chupetes para bebés y niños pequeños y, artículos de puericultura para la alimentación líquida, previamente a la comercialización de productos nacionales e importados, con el propósito de proteger la salud de las personas, así c omo prevenir prácticas que puedan inducir a error. Este reglamento técnico se aplica a los productos: • Chupetes para bebes y niños pequeños sean estos de caucho o plástico. • Artículos de puericultura para la alimentación líquida sean estos de plástico, vidrio o caucho (tales como pajitas, tetinas, biberones, taza para la alimentación líquida, entre otros artículos definidos como artículos de puericultura para la alimentación líquida). Este reglamento técnico no aplica a: • Productos diseñados para aplicaciones médicas especializadas o para uso bajo supervisión médica, por ejemplo las relacionadas con el Síndrome de Pierre -Robin o relacionada con los bebés prematuros. 7. Objetiv o y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes: Información al consumidor, Etiquetado; Prevención de prácticas que puedan inducir a error y protección del consumidor; Protección de la salud o seguridad humanas 8. Documentos pertinentes: Referencias Normativas: 1. Norma ISO 2859 -1:1999+Amd 1:2011, Procedimientos de muestreo para inspección por atributos. Parte 1. Programas de muestreo clasificados por el nivel aceptable de calidad (AQL) para inspección lote a lote. 2. Norma ISO/IEC 17025:2017, Requisitos generales para la competencia de los laboratorios de ensayo y calibración. 3. Norma ISO/IEC 17050 -1:2004, Evaluación de la Conformidad – Declaración de la conformidad del proveedor. Parte 1: Requisitos Generales. 4. Norma ISO/I EC 17067:2013, Evaluación de la conformidad. Fundamentos de certificación de productos y directrices aplicables a los esquemas de certificación de producto. 5. Norma UNE -EN 1400:2013 + A2: 2019, Artículos de puericultura. Chupetes para bebés y niños pequeños . Requisitos de seguridad y métodos de ensayo. 6. Norma NTE INEN -EN 14350 -1:2011, Artículos de puericultura. Artículos para la alimentación líquida. Parte 1: Requisitos generales y mecánicos y ensayos . 7. Norma NTE INEN -EN 14350 -2:2011 + fe de erratas: 2011, Artículos de puericultura. Artículos para la alimentación líquida. Parte 2: Requisitos químicos y ensayos . 8. Normativa Técnica Sanitaria ARCSA -DE-026-2016-YMIH, Normativa técnica sanitaria sustitutiva para el registro sanitario y control de dispositivos médic os de uso humano, y de los establecimientos en donde se fabrican, importan, dispensan, expenden y comercializan . Trazabilidad: G/TBT/N/ECU/374 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción: Desde 30 días a partir de la notificación. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor: 6 meses a partir de la fecha de adopción. 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones: 30 días desde la notificación G/TBT/N/ECU/374/Rev.1 - 3 - 11. Textos disponibles en: Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios Web, en su caso, de otra institución : Punto de Contacto y/o Centro de Información Nacional: Subsecretaría de Calidad Ministerio de Producción, Comercio, Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca (MPCEIP) Dirección: Av. Amaz onas entre Unión Nacional de Periodistas y Alfonso Pereira, Piso 8, Bloque amarillo Teléfono: (+593 2) 3948760 Ext. 2254 - 2272 Correo electrónico: puntocontactoOTCECU@produccion.gob.ec puntocontactoOTCECU@gmail.com cyepez@produccion.gob.ec jsanchezc@produccion.gob.ec www.normalizacion.gob.ec www.normalizacion.gob.ec https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/TBT/ECU/20_3547_00_s.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_IP_C_W669A6.pdf

r_IP_C_W669A6

IP/C/W/669/Add.6 16 décembre 2020 (20-9123) Page: 1/1 Conseil des aspects des droits de propriété intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce Original: anglais DÉROGATIONS À CERTAINES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ACCORD SUR LES ADPIC POUR LA PRÉVENTION, L'ENDIGUEMENT ET LE TRAITEMENT DE LA COVID -19 COMMUNICATION DE L'INDE ET DE L'AFRIQUE DU SUD Addendum Par une communication datée du 16 décembre 2020, l a délégation d e la Mongolie a demandé à être ajoutée à la liste des coauteurs de la communication distribuée sous la cote IP/C/W/6 69. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_AG_W125R19A2C1.pdf

q_G_AG_W125R19A2C1

G/AG/W/125/Rev.19/Add.2/Corr.1 16 August 2023 (23-5540) Page: 1/3 Committee on Agriculture EXPORT SUBSIDIES, EXPORT CREDITS, EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEES OR INSURANCE PROGRAMMES, INTERNATIONAL FOOD AID AND AGRICULTURAL EXPORTING STATE TRADING ENTERPRISES BACKGROUND DOCUMENT BY THE SECRETARIAT1 Export Credits, Export Credit Guarantees or Insurance Programmes Corrigendum The following entity should be added in the response by the United States on pages 91 -92. United States of America 1. Description of the programmes Export -Import Bank: Export Credit Insurance Program The Export -Import Bank (ExIm) of the United States export credit insurance program allows applicants to increase their export sales by limiting international risk, offering credit to international buyers, and enabling access to working capital funds. The E xport Credit Insurance Program offers four types of insurance policies that may be used to cover export of agricultural products: Short -Term Single Buyer Export Credit Insurance Policies for Exporters; Bank Letter of Credit policies; Financial Institution Buyer Credits; and Multi -Buyer Policies. No ExIm program is designed to support agricultural products specifically, rather agricultural products are treated as general exports and receive no special preference or treatment. Exporters of certain types of ag ricultural commodities shipped in bulk (wheat, corn, soybeans, rice, etc.) are eligible to receive 98% coverage for any commercial or political losses. Like certain other ExIm -supported products, bulk agricultural commodities may also qualify for ExIm insu rance on terms up to 360 days. The export items must meet ExIm's U.S. content requirements as outlined at https://www.exim.gov/policies/content/short - term-content -policy . Classification: The Export Credit Insurance program is a "risk cover" program. Relevant legislation: Export -Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended (P.L. 114 -94 codified at 12 U.S.C. §635 et seq.). More information regarding ExIm's Export Credit Insurance program is available at https://www.exim.gov/what -we-do/export -credit -insurance . 2. Description of Export Financing Entity The Export -Import Bank of the United States is the official export credit agency (ECA) of the United States. ExIm is an independent, self -sustaining federal agency that provides export credit support for U.S. exports. ExIm provides export credit support on a non -discriminatory basis. The Bank requires a reasonable assurance of repayment and provides a variety of financing mechanisms, 1 This document has been prepared under the Secretariat's own responsibility and is without prejudice to the positions of Members or to their rights and obligations under the WTO. It has been prepared for information only and is not intended to provide any authoritative or official legal interpretation of the provisions of the WTO Agreements in general or in relation to any specific entity or measure listed in this document. G/AG/W/125/Rev.19/Add.2/Corr.1 - 2 - including working -capital guarantees, export -credit insurance and financing to help foreign buyers purchase U.S. goods and services. 3. Total value of export of agricultural products covered by export credits, export credit guarantees or insurance programmes and use per programme In U.S. Fiscal Year 2022, the U.S. Export -Import Bank insured shipments of agricult ural products with an estimated export value of USD 445,605,202. 4. Annual average premium rates/fees per programme For U.S. Fiscal Year 2022, weighted average premium (by shipment value insured) charged on short term insurance of agricultural products was USD 0.46 per USD 100 of coverage. 5. Maximum repayment terms per programme For U.S. Fiscal Year 2022, on a case -by-case basis, bulk agricultural commodities under the Export Credit Insurance Program may be insured on terms up to, but not exceeding, 360 da ys. 6. Annual average repayment periods per programme For U.S. Fiscal Year 2022, the typical repayment period for the agricultural products under the Export Credit Insurance Program is 31 -60 days; the average repayment period was 50 days. 7. Export destina tion or group of destinations per programme Export Credit Insurance program for U.S. Fiscal Years 2022 Export Destinations Africa and Middle East Asia Caribbean Central America Europe North America Eurasia Southeast Asia and Oceania South America 8. Programme use by product or product group Export Credit Insurance program shipments of agricultural commodities for U.S. Fiscal Year 2022 Product Description Shipment Amount for FY 2022 (in USD) Alcoholic Beverages 14,915,497 Animal feed and supplements 60,417,401 Confectionery 13,692,931 Cotton 71,222,495 Dairy and dairy products 7,788,493 Flour 4,389,798 Grains and Beans 16,576,055 Honey 30,250 Live Trees, Plants, Cut Flowers 1,802,657 Miscellaneous food product 203,856,295 Other farm product raw material 19,131,527 Processed foods including canned and frozen 31,781,803 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION G/AG/W/125/Rev.19/Add.2/Corr.1 - 3 - DATA ORIGINATING FROM NOTIFICATIONS __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN21_VNM195.pdf

s_G_TBTN21_VNM195

G/TBT/N/VNM/195 13 de julio de 2021 (21-5506) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica : VIET NAM Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable: Ministry of Transport (Ministerio de Transporte) 80 Tran Hung Dao Hoan Kiem Hanói Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autorida d encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad diferente: Notification Authority & Enquiry Point of the Ministry of Transport (Organismo encargado de las notificaciones y Servicio d e información del Ministerio de Transporte) Viet Nam Register (Registro de Viet Nam) 18 Pham Hung, My Dinh 2, Nam Tu Liem, Hanói (Viet Nam) Teléfono : 04.3768 4838 Fax: 04.3768 4840 Correo electrónico: tbtgtvt@vr.org.vn Sitio web: http://www.tbt -bgtvt.vn/ 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de: 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando corresponda ; en otro caso partida del arancel nacional . Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : Vehículos montados, fabricados e importados nuevos ; VEHÍCULOS DE CARRET ERA ( ICS 43 ) 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado : Draft National Technical Regulation on road vehicles headlamps (Proyecto de Reglamento Técnico Nacional sobre los faros de los vehículos de carretera) . Documento en vietnamita (86 páginas). 6. Descripción del contenido : El Proyecto de Reglamento Técnico notificado especifica las pruebas de las características ópticas de los faros de los vehículos de carretera. El Proyecto de Reglamento Técnico se aplica a los establecimientos de importación y fabricación de faros, a los establecimientos de importación de vehículos automotores de carretera y a las organizaciones y a las personas que intervienen en la inspección y certificación de la calidad y la seguridad técnic a de los faros. G/TBT/N/VNM/195 - 2 - 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes : prescripciones de calidad. 8. Documentos pertinentes: 1. Decree 116/2017/ND -CP, of October 17, 2017 of the Government on conditions for automobiles manufacturing, assembling importing and automotive warranty and maintenance services . 2. Circular No. 45/2012/TT -BGTVT dated 23 October 2012 on the environment and technical safety quality inspection in manufacture and assembly of motorbikes. 3. Circular No. 30/2011/TT -BGTVT dated 15 April 2011 on the environment and technical safety quality inspection for motor vehicle production and assembly ; y Circular No. 54/2014/TT -BGTVT dated October 20, 2014 amending and supplementing a number of articles of Ci rcular No. 30/2011/TT -BGTVT dated 15 April 2011 on the environment and technical safety quality inspection for motor vehicle production and assembly issued by Minister of Transport. 4. QCVN 35 :2017/BGTVT : National technical regulation on optical characteristi cs of road vehicle headlamps 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción : septiembre de 2021 Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : seis meses después de la fecha de publicación 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : 45 días después de la fecha de notificación 11. Textos disponibles en : Servicio nacional de información [X], o dirección, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso, de otra institución: Notification Authority & Enquiry Point of the Ministry of Transport (Organismo encargado de las notificaciones y Servicio de información del Ministerio de Transporte) Viet Nam Register (Registro de Viet Nam) 18 Pham Hung, My Dinh 2, Nam Tu Liem, Hanói (Viet Nam) Teléfono : 04.3768 4838 Fax: 04.3768 484 0 Correo electrónico: tbtgtvt@vr.org.vn Sitio web: http://www.tbt -bgtvt.vn/ https://membe rs.wto.org/crnattachments/2021/TBT/VNM/21_4646_00_x.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NBDI10.pdf

r_G_SPS_NBDI10

G/SPS/N/BDI/10, G/SPS/N/KEN/162 G/SPS/N/RWA/3, G/SPS/N/TZA/194 G/SPS/N/UGA/204 2 août 2022 (22-5769) Page: 1/3 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION 1. Membre notifiant: BURUNDI, KENYA, OUGANDA, RWANDA, TANZANIE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés: 2. Organisme responsable: Uganda National Bureau of Standards (Office national de normalisation) 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figurant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC. Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant): Autres (SH 070190 ); Légumes et produits dérivés (ICS 67.080.20); Tubercules de pommes de terre de consommation 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable: [X] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [ ] Régions ou pays spécifiques: 5. Intitulé du text e notifié: DEAS 775: 2022, Production and handling ware potato tuber - Code of practice (Production et manipulation de tubercules de pommes de terre de consommation - Code de pratique), deuxième édition. Langue(s): anglais. Nombre de pages: 16 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2022/SPS/UGA/22_5060_00_e.pdf 6. Teneur: Le projet de norme est -africaine notifié fournit des recommandations pour la production, le stockage, l'emballage et le transport de tubercules de pommes de terre de consommation ( Solanum tuberosum L.) destinés à la consommation humaine. Ce code se concentre sur les questions spécifiques à la production primaire et à l'emballage des tubercules de pommes de terre de consommation dans le but de d'obtenir un produit de qualité, sûr et sain. Il traite des bonnes pratiques agricoles (BPA), des bonnes pratiques d'hygiène (BPH) et des bonnes pra tiques de fabrication (BPF) qui permettront de lutter contre les risques microbiens, chimiques et physiques associés à toutes les étapes de la production des tubercules de pommes de terre de consommation, de la production primaire à l'emballage. Il accorde une attention particulière à la réduction à un niveau minimum des dommages et de la détérioration subis par les tubercules de pommes de terre de consommation avant leur mise sur le marché. Il ne fournit pas de renseignements détaillés considérés comme éta nt généralement applicables à tous les fruits et légumes ou produits alimentaires en général. De telles dispositions se trouvent dans d'autres codes. Ce code devrait être utilisé conjointement avec les codes EAS 39 et CAC/RCP 53, Code d'usages en matière d 'hygiène pour les fruits et légumes frais. Note: Ce projet de norme est -africaine a aussi été notifié au Comité OTC. G/SPS/N/BDI/10 • G/SPS/N/KEN/162 • G/SPS/N/RWA/3 • G/SPS/N/TZA/194 • G/SPS/N/UGA/204 - 2 - 7. Objectif et raison d'être: [X] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [ ] santé des animaux, [ ] préservation des végétaux, [ ] protectio n des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [ ] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à des parasites. 8. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle: [ ] Commission du Codex Alimentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : [ ] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE) (par exemple, numéro de chapitre du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux aquatiques) : [ ] Convention internationale pour la protection des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP) : [X] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme inte rnationale pertinente? [ ] Oui [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internationale: 9. Autres documents pertinents et langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: • EAS 38. General standard for labeling of prepackaged foods • EAS 39. Hygiene in the food and drink manufacturing industry - Code of practice • CAC/RCP 53 . Code of hygienic practice for fresh fruits and vegetables • EAS 775:2012 . Production and handling of fresh ware potatoes - Code of practice (disponibles en anglais) 10. Date projetée pour l'adoption (jj/mm/aa) : à déterminer. Date projetée pour la publication (jj/mm/aa) : à déterminer. 11. Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur: [ ] Six mois à compter de la date de publication, et/ou (jj/mm/aa) : à déterminer. [X] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Date limite pour la prése ntation des observations: [X] Soixante jours à compter de la date de distribution de la notification et/ou ( jj/mm/aa ): 1er octobre 2022 Organisme ou autorité désigné pour traiter les observations: [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [ ] point d'information national. Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Uganda National Bureau of Standards Plot 2 -12 ByPass Link, Bweyogerere Industrial and Business Park P.O. Box 6329 Kampala (Ouganda) Téléphone: +(256) 4 1733 3250/1/2 Fax: +(256) 4 1428 6123 Courrier électronique: info@unbs.go.ug Site Web: https://www.unbs.go.ug G/SPS/N/BDI/10 • G/SPS/N/KEN/162 • G/SPS/N/RWA/3 • G/SPS/N/TZA/194 • G/SPS/N/UGA/204 - 3 - 13. Texte(s) disponible(s) auprès de: [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [ ] point d'information national. Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Uganda National Bureau of Standards Plot 2 -12 ByPass Link, Bweyogerere Industrial and Business Park P.O. Box 6329 Kampala (Ouganda) Téléphone: +(256) 4 1733 3250/1/2 Fax: +(256) 4 1428 6123 Courrier électronique: info@unbs.go.ug Site Web: https://www.unbs.go.ug

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_SPS_NCHN1221.pdf

q_G_SPS_NCHN1221

G/SPS/N/CHN/1221 16 June 2021 (21-4918) Page: 1/2 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English NOTIFICATION 1. Notifying Member: CHINA If applicable, name of local government involved: 2. Agency responsible: National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China 3. Products covered (provide tariff item number(s) as specified in national schedules deposited with the WTO; ICS numbers should be provided in addition, where applicable): Cream, butter and anhydrous milkfat 4. Regions or countries likely to be affected, to the extent relevant or practicable : [X] All trading partners [ ] Specific regions or countries: 5. Title of the notified document: National Food Safety Standard of the P.R.C.: Cream, Butter and Anhydrous Milkfat . Language(s): Chinese . Number of pages: 4 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2021/SPS/CHN/21_4125_00_x.pdf 6. Description of content: This standard applies to cream, butter and anhydrous milkfat. This standard stipulates the terms, definitions, technical requirements, etc. of cream, butter and anhydrous milkfat. 7. Objective and rationale: [X] food safety, [ ] animal health, [ ] plant protection, [ ] protect humans from animal/plant pest or disease, [ ] protect territory from other damage from pests. 8. Is there a relevant international standard? If so, identify the standard: [X] Codex Alimentarius Commission (e.g. title or serial num ber of Codex standard or related text) : − Codex Stan 279 -1971 Standard for Butter − Codex Stan 288 -1976 Standard for Cream and Prepared Creams − Codex Stan 280 -1973 Standard for Milkfat Products [ ] World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (e.g. Terrestrial or Aquatic Animal Health Code, chapter number) : [ ] International Plant Protection Convention (e.g. ISPM number) : [ ] None Does this proposed regulation conform to the relevant international st andard? [X] Yes [ ] No If no, describe, whenever possible, how and why it deviates from the international standard: 9. Other relevant documents and language(s) in which these are available: G/SPS/N/CHN/1221 - 2 - 10. Proposed date of adoption (dd/mm/yy) : To be determined. Proposed date of publication (dd/mm/yy) : To be determined. 11. Proposed date of entry into force: [ ] Six months from date of publication , and/or (dd/mm/yy) : To be determined. [ ] Trade facilitating measure 12. Final date for comments: [X] Sixty days from the date of circulation of the notification and/or (dd/mm/yy) : 15 August 2021 Agency or authority designated to handle comments: [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail a ddress (if available) of other body: WTO/SPS National Notification and Enquiry Center of the People's Republic of China Tel: +(86 10) 5795 4645/5795 4642 E-mail: sps@customs.gov.cn 13. Text(s) available from: [ ] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail address (if available) of other body: WTO/SPS National Notification and Enquiry Center of the People's Republic of China Tel: +(86 10) 5795 4645/5795 4642 E-mail: sps@customs.gov.cn

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN21_EU834.pdf

r_G_TBTN21_EU834

G/TBT/N/EU/834 7 septembre 2021 (21-6654) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : UNION EUROPÉENNE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable : Commission européenne Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des observations concernant la notificatio n doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: Commission européenne Point d'information de l'UE sur les OTC Fax: +(32) 2 299 80 43 Courrier électronique: grow-eu-tbt@ec.europa.eu Site Web: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools -databases/tbt/en/ 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, sinon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Produits biologiques ; produits alimentaires en général ( ICS 67 .040) 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du texte notifié : Draft Commission Implementing Regulation laying down detailed rules on certain records and declarations required from o perators and groups of operators and on the technical means for the issuance of certificates in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Projet de règlement d'exécution de la Commission fixant des règles détai llées en ce qui concerne certains registres et déclarations devant être présentés par les opérateurs et les groupes d'opérateurs, et les moyens techniques pour la délivrance de certificats conformément au Règlement (UE) 2018/848 du Parlement européen et du Conseil), 5 pages, en anglais 6. Teneur : Le Projet de règlement d'exécution de la Commission notifié fixe des règles détaillées pour la délivrance de certificats sous forme électronique, pour certains registres relatifs aux vérifications des mesures préventives et de précaution, à la traçabilité et au bilan massique, et pour certaines déclarations et communications exigées pour des contrôles officiels. 7. Objectif et justification, y compris la nature des problèmes urgents, le cas échéant : À la suite de la publication du Règlement (UE) 2018/848 du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif à la production biologique et à l 'étiquetage des produits biologiques, et abrogeant le Règlement (CE) n° 834/2007 du Conseil, il est nécessaire d'adopter cet acte d'exécution, qui établit les dispositions détaillées susmentionnées, avant le 1er janvier 2 022. Les producteurs ont besoin d'un délai suffisant pour s'adapter G/TBT/N/EU/834 - 2 - aux nouvelles règles et les États membres de l'UE doivent avoir un délai suffi sant pour incorporer ces nouvelles règles dans leur législation nationale. ; Autres 8. Documents pertinents: Règlement (UE) 2018/848 du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif à la production biologique et à l'étiquetage des produits biologiques, et abrog eant le Règlement (CE) n° 834/2007 du Conseil EUR-Lex - 32018R0848 - FR - EUR-Lex (europa.eu) 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : Fin novembre 2 021 Date p rojetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : Le vingtième jour suivant celui de la publication au Journal officiel de l'Union européenne . Application à compter du 1er janvier 2022 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : 60 jours à compter de la date de notification 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les textes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [ ] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: Comm ission européenne Point d'information de l'UE sur les OTC Fax: + (32) 2 299 80 43, Courrier électronique: grow-eu-tbt@ec.europa.eu Texte accessible via le site Web de l'UE sur les OTC: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools - databases/tbt/fr/ https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2021/TBT/EEC/21_5632_00_e.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NBRA1865A1.pdf

s_G_SPS_NBRA1865A1

G/SPS/N/BRA/1865/Add.1 17 de marzo de 2021 (21-2223) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, recibida el 16 de marzo de 2021 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación del Brasil . _______________ Resolution - RE number 958, 4 March 2021 (Resolución RE Nº 958, de 4 de marzo de 2021 ) El Proyecto de Resolución Nº 976, de 15 de diciembre de 2020 , notificado anteriormente en el documento G/SPS/N/BRA/1865, se ha adoptado como Resolución RE Nº 958, de 4 de marzo de 2021. El texto completo está disponible solamente en portugués y puede descargarse de: https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=08/03/2021&jornal=515&pagi na=140 . Este addendum se refiere a: [ ] la modificación de la fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones [X] la notificación de la adopción, publicación o entrada en vigor del reglamento [ ] la modificación del contenido y/o ámbito de aplicación de un proyecto de reglamento previamente notificado [ ] el retiro del reglamento propuesto [ ] la modificación de la fecha propuesta de adopción, publicación o entrada en vigor [ ] otro aspecto: Plazo para la presentación de observaciones : (Si el addendum amplía el ámbito de aplicación de la medida anteriormente notificad a en cuanto a los productos abarcados y/o los Miembros a los que puede afectar, deberá preverse un nuevo plazo para recibir observaciones, normalmente de 60 días naturales como mínimo . En otros casos, como el aplazamiento de la fecha límite anunciada inici almente para la presentación de observaciones, el plazo previsto en el addendum podrá variar.) [ ] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución del addendum a la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : No procede. Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: G/SPS/N/BRA/1865/Add.1 - 2 - International Affairs Office (AINTE) (Asesoría de A suntos Internacionales) Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) (Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria) Teléfono : +(55 61) 3462 5402/5404/5406 Correo electrónico : rel@anvisa.gov.br Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: International Affairs Office (AINTE) (Asesoría de Asuntos Internacionales) Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) (Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria) Teléfono : +(55 61) 3462 5402/5404/5406 Correo electrónico : rel@anvisa.gov.br __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NMEX426.pdf

s_G_SPS_NMEX426

G/SPS/N/MEX/426 5 de abril de 2023 (23-2345) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN 1. Miembro que notifica: MÉXICO Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable: Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA) 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): Mandarina (Citrus reticulata ) 4. Regiones o países que podrían verse afectados, en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [ ] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [X] Regiones o países específicos: Chile 5. Título del documento notificado: Requisitos fitosanitarios para la importación de frut o fresco de mandarina ( Citrus reticulata ), originario y procedente de Chile . Idioma(s): español . Número de páginas: 4 https://www.gob.mx/senasica/documentos/consulta -publica -de-requisitos -fitosanitarios https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/SPS/MEX/23_8717_00_s.pdf 6. Descripción del contenido: Con base al Acuerdo sobre la Aplicación de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias (Acuerdo MSF), se comunica que, como resultado del Análisis de Riesgo de Plagas, el SENASICA determinó la propuesta de requisitos fitosanitarios para la importación a México de fruto fresco de mandarina ( Citrus reticulata ), originario y procedente de Chile. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser: [ X] inocuidad de los alimentos, [ ] sanidad animal, [X] preservación de los vegetales, [X] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [X] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. 8. ¿Exist e una norma internacional pertinente? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [ ] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejem plo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animales Acuáticos) : [ ] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : [X] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? G/SPS/N/MEX/426 - 2 - [ ] Sí [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible, en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional: 9. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s) en que están disponibles: 10. Fecha propuesta de adopción (día/mes/año) : Por determinar. Fecha propuesta de publicación (día/mes/año) : Por determinar. 11. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor: [ ] Seis meses a partir de la fecha de publicación, y/o (día/mes/añ o): Por determinar. [ ] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones: [X] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : 4 de junio de 2023 Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones: [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de informac ión. Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico ( en su caso ) de otra institución: Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural/Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria Agradecemos que los comentarios a los menciona dos requisitos sean respaldados con evidencia técnica y/o científica y tendrán que ser remitidos a la dirección de correo electrónico: importaciones.dgsv@senasica.gob.mx , marcando copia a: René Hern ández - rene.hernandez@senasica.gob.mx Diógenes Hernández Chávez - diogenes.hernandez@economia.gob.mx 13. Texto (s) disponible (s) en: [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información. Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico ( en su caso ) de otra institución: Dirección General de Normas Pachuca 189, Colonia Condesa, Cuauhtémoc, 06140 Ciudad de México, Tel: +(52 55) 5729 9300 (Ext.: 4156/4135) Fax: +(52 55) 5520 9715 Correo electrónico: diogenes.hernandez@economia.gob.mx Sitio web: http://www.economia.gob.mx/?P=855

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/271632_2021_TBT_RWA_21_1699_00_e.pdf

271632_2021_TBT_RWA_21_1699_00_e

ICS 71.100.40 Reference number DRS 455 : 2021 © RSB 2021 RWANDA STANDARD DRS 455 First edition 2021 -mm-dd Non-alcohol based hand sanitizers — Specification DRS 455 : 2021 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved ii In order to match with technological development and to keep continuous progress in industries, standards are subject to periodic review. Users shall ascertain that they are in possession of the latest edition © RSB 2021 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without prior written permission from R SB. Requests for permission to reprodu ce this document should be addressed to : Rwanda Standards Board P.O Box 7099 Kigali -Rwanda KK 15 Rd, 49 Tel. +250 788303492 Toll Free: 3250 E-mail: info@rsb.gov.rw Website: www.rsb.gov.rw ePortal: www.portal.rsb.gov.rw DRS 455: 2021 iii ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved Contents Page 1 Scope ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 1 2 Normative references ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 1 3 Terms and definitions ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 1 4 Requirem ents ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 2 4.1 General requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 2 4.2 Specific requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 2 5 Packaging and labelling ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 2 5.1 Pack aging ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 2 5.2 Labelling ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 3 6 Sampling ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 3 6.1 General ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3 6.2 Sample for inspection ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 3 6.3 Sample for testing ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 4 Annex A (informative) Methods and selection of products to perform hand hygie ne ...................... 5 Annex B (normative) Determination of disinfecting efficacy ................................ ............................... 7 B.1 Outline of the method ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 7 B.2 Apparatus ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 7 B.3 Media ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 8 B.4 Selection of the mos t resistant organism by the minimum inhibitory concentration test ... 9 B.5 Preparation of inoculum ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 10 B.6 Preparation of the sanitizer dilutions ................................ ................................ ....................... 10 B.7 Test procedure ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 10 B.8 Interpreta tion of results ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 11 Annex C (normative) Determination of dermal irritation ................................ ................................ .... 12 C.1 Test panel ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 12 C.2 Procedure ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 12 DRS 455 : 2021 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved iv Foreword Rwanda Standard s are prepared by Technical Committees and approved by R wanda Standards Board (RSB) Board of Directors in accordance with the procedures of RSB, in compliance with Annex 3 of the WTO/TBT agreement on the preparation, adoption and application of standards. The main task o f technical committees is to prepare national standards. Final Draft Rwanda S tandards adopted by Technical committ ees are ratified by me mbers of RSB Board of Director s for publication and gazettment as Rwanda Standards. DRS 455 was prepared by Technical Co mmittee RSB/TC 024, Organic and Inorganic Chemicals. Committee membership The following organizations were represented on the Technical Committee on Organic and Inorganic Chemicals (RSB/TC 024) in the preparation of this standard. Star Construction and Consultancy Ltd Rwanda Inspectorate, Competition and Consumer Protection Authority Rwanda Food and Drugs Authority Rwanda Investigation Bureau Rwanda Forensic Laboratory Rwanda Social Security Board Rwanda Environment Management Authority BARANYUZWE Cosmet ics Ltd SULFO Rwanda Industries Ltd UBURANGA Natural Products Divine Hope Company Ltd University of Rwanda /College of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Rwanda /College of Sciences and Technology University of Rwanda /College of Education DRS 455: 2021 v ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved Rwanda Poly technic – IPRC Kigali Standards for Sustainability (SfS) Rwanda Standards Board (RSB) – Secretariat DRS 455 : 2021 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved vi Introduction Hand sanitizer, also called hand antiseptic, handrub, or hand rub, agent applied to the hands for the purpose of removing common pathogens (disease -causing organisms). Hand sanitizers typically come in foam, gel, or liquid form. Their use is recommended when soap and water are not available for hand washing or when repeated hand washing compromises the natural skin barrier (e.g., causing scal ing or fissures to develop in the skin). Although the effectiveness of hand sanitizer is variable, it is employed as a simple means of infection control in a wide variety of settings, from day -care centres and schools to hospitals and health care clinics a nd from supermarkets to cruise ships. Depending on the active ingredient used, hand sanitizers can be classified as one of two types: alcohol -based or alcohol -free. Alcohol -based products typically contain between 60 and 95 percent alcohol, usually in the form of ethanol, isopropanol, or n -propanol. At those concentrations, alcohol immediately denatures proteins, effectively neutralizing certain types of microorganisms. Alcohol -free products are generally based on disinfectants, such as benzalkonium chlori de (BAC), or on antimicrobial agents, such as triclosan. The activity of disinfectants and antimicrobial agents is both immediate and persistent. Many hand sanitizers also contain emollients (e.g., glycerin) that soothe the skin, thickening agents, and fra grance. DRS 455: 2021 1 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved Non-alcohol based hand sanitizers — Specification 1 Scope This Draft Rwanda Standard prescribes the requirements, sampling and test methods for non -alcohol based hand sanitizers. 2 Normative references The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For dated ref erences, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. RS EAS 377, Cosmetic Products (all parts) RS ISO 10523, Water quality — Determination of pH 3 Terms and definit ions For the purposes of this standard , the follow ing terms and definitions apply . 3.1 hand sanitizer antiseptic agents used to cleanse the hands with the aim to protect and prevent the passage of bacteria, virus and other pathogens that can cause infections. 3.2 non-alcoholic hand sanitizer hand sanitizer in which the antiseptic agent is other than alcoh ol. 3.3 alcohol ethanol (ethyl alcohol, C 2H5OH), isopropanol (isopropyl alcohol, CH 3CHOHCH 3), n-propanol (1 -propanol, CH 3CH 2CH 2OH) or the mixture of them . 3.4 antimicrobial efficacy efficiency of the product to kill or reduce microorganisms, such as bacter ia, fungi and viruses. ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 2 3.5 dermal irritation production of reversible damage of the skin following the application of a test substance for up to 4 hours. 4 Requirements 4.1 General requirements 4.1.1 The product shall be in form of foam, liquid or gel. 4.1.2 The product shall be clear and free from visible impurities. 4.1.3 The product shall not have any disagreeable odour or smell. It may be coloured or not. 4.1.4 The substances used in the formulation shall conform to all parts of RS EAS 377. 4.1.5 The active ingredient and its proportion in the product shall be approved by competent authority. The formulator should consider WHO recommendations given in Annex A . 4.1.6 The product may be dilutable or ready -to-use. For the dilutable product, the manufa cturer shall give clear instruction on dilution ratio. 4.2 Specific requirements The product shall also comply with the specific requirements given in the table 1 when tested in accordance with the corresponding test method. Table 1 – Specific requirements for Non-alcohol based hand sanitizers S/N Parameters Requirements Test methods 1. pH 6 – 8 RS ISO 10523 2. Antibacterial efficacy Pass the test Annex B 3. Dermal irritation Pass the test Annex C 5 Packaging and labelling 5.1 Packaging 5.1.1 The package shall ensure integrity of the product during handling, storage and transportation. 5.1.2 Bulk packaging: Only products of the same type and the same batch shall be packaged together in one bulk package. 5.1.3 The closure shall not be made of cork or of any other material that contains cork. DRS 455: 2021 3 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 5.2 Labelling The following information shall appear in legible and indelible labelling on each container or on a label securely attached to each container: a) name of the product as “Non -alcohol based hand sanitizer”; b) name and full address of the manufacturer; c) active ingredient (s) content; NOTE The tolerance limit from the declared value shall be less than 1% of the active ingredient content . d) net content; e) list of ingredients f) batch identification; g) manufacture and expiry dates; h) instru ctions for use; i) storage conditions; and j) warnings. 6 Sampling 6.1 General The following sampling procedure shall be applied in determining whether a lot submitted for inspection and testing complies with the relevant requirements of this standard. The sample so drawn shall be deemed to represent the lot. 6.2 Sample for inspection After inspecting the lot for compliance with Clause 4, take, at random, the number of containers, as relevant, shown in column 2 of Table 2, relative to the appropriate lot size shown in column 1. Table 2 — Samples for inspection and testing Lot size (number of containers) Sample size for ph ysical examination (number of containers) Sample size for micro biological examin ation (number of containers) 0 to 5 000 3 3 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 4 5 001 to 12 5 00 6 3 12 501 to 25 0 00 9 3 25 001 to 50 0 00 16 3 50 001 upwards 30 3 6.3 Sample for testing After inspection of the containers taken in accordance with 6.2, a) take, at random, half the number of containers and use them for the storage stability test; and b) thoroughly mix the contents of each of the remaining containers and, take from each container the lesser of the total volume and 250 mL, and obtain a composite test sample by combining and thoroughly mixing these quantities. Use these samples for testing for compliance with the requirements of Clause 4. DRS 455: 2021 5 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved Annex A (informative) Methods and selection of products to perform hand hygiene A.1 According to WHO recommendations, when an alcohol -based handrub is available it should be used as the preferred means for routine hand hygiene in health care. A.2 To comply with routine hand hygiene recommendations, Health Care Workers should ideally perform hand hygiene where and when care is provided, which means at the point of care and at the moments indicated, and following the recommended t echnique and time. A.3 The selection products that are both efficacious and as safe as possible for the skin is the utmost importance. A.4 Ways to minimize the possible adverse effects of hand hygiene include selecting less irritating products, using skin moisturizers, and modifying certain hand hygiene behaviours such as unnecessary washing. A.5 The following table gives the antimicrobial activity and summary of the properties of some antiseptics used in hand hygiene. Table A1 – Antimicrobial activity and summary of properties of some antiseptic products Antiseptics Gram - negative bacteria Gram - negative bacteria Viruses enveloped Viruses non- enveloped Myco - bacteria Fungi Spores Alcohols +++ +++ +++ ++ +++ +++ - Chloroxylenol +++ + + ± + + - Chlorhexidine +++ ++ ++ + + + - Hexachlorophenea +++ + ? ? + + - Iodophors +++ +++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ±b Triclosand +++ ++ ? ? ± ±e - Quaternary ammonium compoundsc ++ + + ? ± ± - Antiseptics Typical concentration (%) Speed of action Residual activity Use Alcohols 60 – 80 Fast No HR Chlroxylenol 0.5 – 4 Slow Contradictory HW Chlorhexidine 0.5 – 4 Intermediate Yes HR, HW Hexachlorophenea 3 Slow Yes HW, but not recommended Iodophors 0.5 – 10 Intermediate Contradictory HW Triclosand 0.1 – 2 Intermediate Yes HW; seldom Quaternary ammonium compoundsc Slow No HR, HW; seldom; +alcohols ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 6 Good = +++. moderate = ++, poor = +, variable = ±, none = - HR: handrubbing; HW: handwashing * Activity varies with concentration. a Bacteriostatic. b In concentrations used in antiseptics, iodophors are not sporicidal. c Bacteriostatic, fungistatic, microbicidal at high concentrations. d Mostly bacteriostatic. e Activity against Candida spp., but little activity against filamentous fungi. DRS 455: 2021 7 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved Annex B (normative) Determination of disin fecting efficacy B.1 Outline of the method B.1.1 The sanitizer is tested at the recommended ‘use -dilution’ and concurrently at 0.5 and 1.5 times that dilution. The test consists of challenging the diluted sanitizer with bacterial inoculum, withdrawing a sample after a given time and culturing the sample in a suitable recovery medium. After this sampling, the mixture is again challenged by a second inoculum and after a second interval, is again sampled for culturing. This process is then repeated to provide a th ird challenge. B.1.2 The sample is considered to have passed or failed the test according to the extent of growth shown in the first two cultured samples . B.2 Apparatus B.2.1 Facility, for incubation at 37 ± 1 °C. B.2.2 Facility, for incubation at 27 ± 1 °C. B.2.3 Stop clock, indicating in seconds. B.2.4 Facility, for refrigeration at 4 ± 1°C. B.2.5 Universal containers ― Made of glass and having metal tops with rubber liners. Plastic containers or glass containers wit h plastic tops shall not be used. B.2.6 Test tubes — 19 mm X 150 mm. B.2.7 Filter paper, No. 4 whatman (sterile) or equivalent. B.2.8 Facility, for autoclaving at 121 ± 1°C. B.2.9 Pipette, capable of dispensing 0.02 ± 1°C 0.005 ml. B.2.10 pH meter B.2.11 Facility, to sterilize by filtration. B.2.12 150 μm test sieve. B.2.13 Oven, capable of maintaining temperature at 100 ± 1 °C. ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 8 B.3 Media B.3.1 Growth media for test organisms. Wright and Mundy Broth with Dextrose (WMBD). B.3.1.1 Dispense 10 ml and 6 m l quantities of the Wright and Mundy Broth into universal bottles, and autoclave at 121 ± 1 °C for 12 minutes. B.3.1.2 Add to this medium, 10 per cent (m/V) dextrose solution sterilized by filtration, to give a final dextrose concentration of 0.1 per cent (m/v), (i.e. to 10 mL broth add 0.1 dextrose solution and to 6.0 mL broth add 0.06 mL dextrose solution). B.3.2 Recovery medium ― A nutrient broth prepared as follows: B.3.2.1 Composition  Beef extract 10 g  Peptone 10 g  Sodium chloride 5 g  Polyoxyethylene sorbitan mono -oleate 30 g B.3.2.2 Preparation ― Add the ingredients to 1000 mL of water. Mix well. Dispense 10 ml quantities into test tubes and autoclave at 121 ± 1°C for 15 minutes . B.3.3 Hard water — Standard hard water with 342 mg/L (p pm) hardness prepared as follows: Dissolve 0.304 g of anhydrous calcium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl 2.6H2O) in distilled water and make up the volume to one litre. Sterilize the standard hard water by autoclaving at 121 ± 1° C for 15 minutes. Allow this to reach room temperature before use . B.3.4 Yeast suspension B.3.4.1 Weigh to the nearest gram about 65 g of active dry yeast. Cream by the gradual addition of sterile hard water ( B.3.3) using a heavy glass rod for stirring. Decant the creamed portion into a flask, add more hard water to any lumpy residue remaining and repeat the creaming and decantation until no residue remain s, and 500 ml of hard water has been used. B.3.4.2 Shake the contents of the flask vigorously and strain -through a 150 m sieve ( B.2.12) breaking down any remaining lumps. B.3.4.3 Add 500 mL sterile hard water, shake vigorously. B.3.4.4 Transfer 50 ml or 100 mL portions into screw -capped bottles, screw the caps tightly and autoclave at 121 ± 1°C for 15 minutes. Allow the autoclave to cool without releasing the pressure. Store cold but not freezing. DRS 455: 2021 9 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved B.3.4.5 Dry two glass petri -dishes to constant mass. Into each of these dishes, pipette 25 mL of sterilized yeast suspension and dry to constant mass at 100°C. Calculate the average solids content of the suspension. B.3.4.6 Before use, pipette 25 ml of the sterilized yeast suspension into a beaker. Determine the pH using a glass electrode, and determine the volume of 40 g/L sodium hydroxide solution needed to adjust the pH to 7.0 ± 0.1. B.3.4.7 Immediately before use, add to each bottle of sterilized yeast suspension a volume of sterile hard water and a volume of 40 g/l sodium hydroxide calculated to adjust the concentration of dry yeast to 5 per cent (m/V) and the pH to 7.0 ± 0.1. Discard prepared yeast, two weeks after preparation. B.3.5 Ringers solution, 25 per cent (V/V) Dissolve 9.00 g of sodium chloride, 0.42 g of potassium chloride, 0.24 g of anhydrous calcium chloride and 0.20 g of sodium bicarbonate in water and dilute to 1000 ml . Add 1 volume of this solution to 3 volumes of water to give a 25 per cent solution. Dispense into test tubes fitted with suitable closures and sterilized by auto -claving at 121 ± 1°C for 15 minutes . B.4 Selection of the most resistant organism by the minimu m inhibitory concentration test B.4.1 The following organisms shall be used for the test:  Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NCTC 6749 or equivalent)  Proteus vulgaris (NCTC 4635 or equivalent)  Staphyloccus aureus (NCTC 4163 or equivalent) These organisms may be ob tained as freeze dried cultures. Once sub -cultured, the organisms shall be maintained on agar slopes of suitable nutrient medium at 4 ± 1°C. B.4.2 Subculture each organism daily into a universal bottle containing 6 ml of growth medium ( B.3.1) and incubate for 24 ± 2 h at 37 ± 1°C. B.4.3 Dilute one part of freshly grown sub -culture of each organism, which is at least a fifth sub -culture and not more than a fourteenth, with ten parts of the growth medium ( B.3.1) before dilution, the P. aeruginosa , culture sh all be filtered using a whatman No.4 filter paper. B.4.4 Prepared three sets of ten, doubling dilutions of the sanitizer in universal containers ( B.2.5). For this purpose, dilute the neat sanitizer in the growth medium ( B.3.1) or the recovery medium ( B.3.2) to give a final volume of 5 ml of the diluted sanitizer for each dilution. B.4.5 Inoculate each dilution in one set with 0.02 mL of a diluted culture of one organism (see B.4.3). B.4.6 Incubate all the three sets of inoculate dilutions at 37 ± 1°C for 72 hours, and examine to determine the organism most resistant to the sanitizer, that is the organism for which the minimum inhibitory concentration is highest . ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 10 B.5 Preparation of inoculum B.5.1 Daily sub -cultures of the test organism selected as in B.4.6 sha ll be grown in 6 ml quantities of the growth medium ( B.3.1) and incubated at 37 ± 1°C for 24 ± 2 hours. B.5.2 The day before the test, inoculate 10 ml of the growth medium ( B.3.1) with the test organism from a daily sub -culture and not more than a fourteen th. Incubate the inoculated, broth at 37 ± 1°C for 24 ± 2 hours. B.5.3 Add 6 ml of the test organism culture ( B.5.1) and ( B.5.2) to 4 ml of the yeast suspension ( B.3.4) thus making a final concentration of 2 per cent (m/V) of yeast in the yeast/organism su spension. If a culture of P. aeruginosa is used, it shall be filtered using a whatman No.4 filter paper before addition . B.5.4 Shake the yeast/organism suspension for one minute with a few sterile glass beads. Immediately before the test, count the number of viable organisms in the inoculum by decimal dilutions in 25 per cent Ringers solution (see B.3.5) and by the drop plate meth od. The viable count shall be not less than 108 organisms/ml or more than 1010 organisms/ml or the test results are considered invalid . B.6 Preparation of the sanitizer dilutions Prepare three dilutions of the sanitizer in hard water ( B.3.3) based on the recom mended ‘use dilution’ of the sanitizer, as follows: A = 0.5 times the recommended ‘use -dilution’ B = 1.0 times the recommended ‘use -dilution’ C = 1.5 times the recommended ‘use -dilution’ The sanitizer dilutions shall be prepared and tested on the same day. B.7 Test procedure B.7.1 The test shall be carried out at 27 ± 1°C. B.7.2 Dispense 3 mL of each dilution of sanitizer ( B.6) into separate universal bottles labelled A, B, and C, then allow to equilibrate to 27 ± 1°C. B.7.3 Add 1 mL of the inoculum to A, B and C at 0, 1 and 5 minutes respectively and mix by swirling gently. B.7.4 Eight minutes after the addition of the inoculum, remove a sample of the inoculum/sanitizer mixture and put 0.02 ml into each of the first group of five tubes of recovery broths. Retur n the remainder of the mixture in the pipette to the universal container . B.7.5 Ten minutes after the first addition of the inoculum, add another 1 ml of the inoculum to each of the sanitizer dilutions and mix by swirling gently . DRS 455: 2021 11 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved B.7.6 Eight minutes later, remove a sample of the mixture as put before ( B.7.4) and put 0.02 mL into each of the second group of five tubes of recovery broths. B.7.7 Twenty minutes after the first addition of the inoculum, add a further 1 m L of inoculum to each of the sanitizer dilutions and mix by swirling gently. B.7.8 Eight minutes later, remove a sample of the mixture as before and place 0.02 ml into each of the third group of five tubes of recovery broths. B.7.9 Swirl the recovery broths and incubate at 37 ± 1°C for 48 ± 2 h. Examine the growth and record the results . B.8 Interpretation of results B.8.1 The sanitizer, shall be regarded as having passed the test at the recommended ‘use dilution’ if there is no growth in at least two of the fiv e recovery broths for the first and second additions of the inoculum. B.8.2 To be acceptable, an instant hand sanitizer shall pass the test on three separate occasions using freshly prepared sanitizer and freshly prepared inoculum on each occasion . ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved 12 Annex C (normative) Determination of dermal irritation C.1 Test panel A test panel that consists of three men and three women, none of whom is known to have an abnormally sensitive skin or has an injury or abrasion on the hands. C.2 Procedure Place approximately 5 mL of the test sample onto the cupped palm of one hand of each member of the panel, and get him or her to spread the Hand Sanitizer over the back and between the fingers of the other hand, and rub it thoroughly into the skin for 2 min. Repeat this procedure twic e, with 30 min intervals between applications. Do not allow a treated hand to be washed until 2 h after the last application of the test sample. Immediately after the tests, and again 2 h, 24 h and 48 h later, examine the treated hand of each member of the panel for any signs of irritation or inflammation, using the untreated hand as a control. DRS 455: 2021 13 ©RSB 2021 - All rights reserved Bibliography [1] World Health Organization (WHO), Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care , 2009 [2] World Health Organization (WHO), Guide to local production — WHO -recommended Handrub Formulations, 2009. DRS 455: 2021 Price based on …..pages ©RSB 2021 - All right s reserved

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_Jobs_ICN-GPA_6.pdf

r_Jobs_ICN-GPA_6

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN20_RWA327.pdf

r_G_TBTN20_RWA327

G/TBT/N/RWA/327 8 janvier 2020 (20-0167) Page: 1/3 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : RWANDA Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable : Rwanda Standards Board - RSB (Office des normes du Rwanda) Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des o bservations concernant la notification doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: Rwanda Standards Board (Office des normes du Rwanda) KK 15 Rd, 49 P.O. BOX 7099 , Kigali (Rwanda) Téléphone : +250 7883 03492 Courrier électronique: info@rsb.gov.rw Site Web: www.rsb.gov.rw 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, sinon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Céréales, légumineuses et produits dérivés ( ICS 67 .060) 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du texte notifié : DEAS 1024 :2019 . Fortified composite flour - Specification (Farines mixtes enrichies - Spécifications), 14 pages, en anglais 6. Teneur : Le projet de norme est -africaine notifié établit les exigences et les méthodes d'échantillonnage et d'essai applicables aux farines mixtes enrichies destinées à la consommation humaine. 7. Objectif et justification, y compris la nature des problèm es urgents, le cas échéant : Protection de la santé ou de la sécurité des personnes ; exigences en matière de qualité 8. Documents pertinents: AOAC 952 .13. Arsenic dans les aliments - Méthode au diéthyldithiocarbamate d'argent AOAC 953 .17. Thiamine (vitamin B1) in grain products . Fluor AOAC 970 .65. Riboflavin(Vitamin B2) in Foods and Vitamin Pr AOAC 975 .41. Niacin and Niacinamide in Cereal Products AOAC 961 .15. Method modification for liquid chromatographic determination of thiamine, riboflavin, and pyridoxine in medical foods G/TBT/N/RWA/327 - 2 - AOAC 2004 .05. Total Folates in Cereal AOAC 2001 .13. Determination of Vitamins A (Retinol) and E (alpha -Tocopherol) in Foods by Liquid Chromatography : Collaborative Study CODEX STAN 192. N orme générale pour les additifs alimentaires EAS 38. Labelling of pre -packaged foods - General requirements EAS 39. Hygiene in the food and drink manufacturing industry - Code of practice EAS 744. Cassava and cassava products - Determination of total cyanogens - Enzymatic assay method EAS 782. Composite flour - Specification EAS 900. Cereals and pulses - Sampling EAS 901. Cereals and pulses - Test methods EAS 803. Nutrition labelling - Requirements EAS 804. Claims on foods - Requirements EAS 805. Use of nutrition and health claims - Requirements ISO 16649 -2. Microbiologie des aliments - Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des Escherichia coli bêta -glucuronidase positive - Partie 2 : Technique de comptage des colonies à 44 degrés C au moyen de 5 -bromo -4-chloro -3-indolyl bêta -D-glucuronate ISO 21527 -2. Microbiologie des aliments - Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des levures et moisissures - Partie 2 : Technique par comptage des colonies dans les produits à activité d'eau inférieure ou égale à 0,95 ISO 4833-1. Microbiologie de la chaîne alimentaire - Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des micro -organismes - Partie 1 : Comptage des colonies à 30 degrés C par la technique d'ensemencement en profondeur ISO 5498. Produits agricoles alimentaires - Détermination de l'indice d'insoluble dit "cellulosique" - Méthode générale ISO 5506. Produits dérivés du soja - Détermination de l'activité uréasique ISO 5985. Aliments des animaux - Dosage des cendres insolubles dans l'acide chlorhydrique ISO 6561-1. Fruits, légumes et produits dérivés - Détermination de la teneur en cadmium - Partie 1 : Méthode par spectrométrie d'absorption atomique avec four en graphite ISO 6561-2. Fruits, légumes et produits dérivés - Détermination de la teneur en cadmium - Partie 2 : Méthode par spectrométrie d'absorption atomique avec flamme ISO 6579-1. Microbiologie de la chaîne alimentaire - Méthode horizontale pour la recherche, le dénombrement et le sérotypage des Salmonella - Partie 1 : Recherche des Salmonella spp. ISO 6633. Fruits, légumes et produits dérivés - Détermination de la teneur en plomb - Méthode par spectrométrie d'absorption atomique sans flamme ISO 6888-1. Microbiologie des aliments - Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des staphylocoques à coagulase positive ( Staphylococcus aureus et autres espèces) - Partie 1 : Technique utilisant le milieu gélosé de Baird -Parker ISO 7305. Produits de mouture des céréales - Détermination de l'acidité grasse ISO 9648. Sorgho - Dosage des tanins ISO 20634 . Formules infantiles et produits nutritionnels pour adultes - Détermination de la teneur en vitamine B12 par chromatographie liquide haute performance en phase inverse (CLHP -PI) G/TBT/N/RWA/327 - 3 - 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : à déterminer Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : à déterminer 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : 60 jours à compter de la date de notification 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les textes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [X] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: KK 15 Rd, 49 Numéro sans frais : 3250 Téléphone : +250 788303492 Courrier électronique: info@rsb.gov.rw Site Web: www.rsb.gov.rw P.O. BOX 7099 , Kigali (Rwanda) https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/TBT/RWA/20_0213_00_e.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_VAL_N2COL3.pdf

r_G_VAL_N2COL3

G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 5 mai 2021 (21-3839) Page: 1/9 Comité de l'évaluation en douane Original: espagnol RENSEIGNEMENTS CONCERNANT L 'APPLICATION ET L 'ADMINISTRATION DE L'ACCORD SUR L 'ÉVALUATION EN DOUANE LISTE DE QUESTIONS COLOMBI E La communication ci -après, datée du 19 avril 2 021, est distribuée à la demande de la délégation de la Colombie . _______________ 1. Questions relatives à l 'article premier : a) Ventes entre personnes liées : i) Les ventes entre personnes liées sont -elles assujetties à des dispositions spéciales ? La Colombi e étant un pays Membre de la Communauté andine, elle applique les dispositions réglementaires énoncées dans les articles 14, 15 et 16 du Règlement communautaire relatif à la Décision n° 571 de la Communauté andine - Valeur en douane des marchandises import ées. Ce règlement a été adopté par l 'intermédiaire de la Résolution n° 1684 du Secrétariat général de la Communauté andine du 23 mai 2014. ii) L'existence de prix de cession entre sociétés est -elle un motif suffisant pour considérer que les prix correspondants sont influencés ? En pareil cas, la Colombie applique les dispositions de l 'article 17 du Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014, qui dispose ce qui suit : "Article 17. Prix de cession Lorsque des prix de cession auront été convenus, l 'importateur, volontairement ou à la demande de l 'administration des douanes, devra démontrer que ces prix correspondent au prix effectivement payé ou à payer et, en particulier, que les liens exist ants n 'ont pas influencé le prix et que les autres prescriptions de l 'article 5 du présent Règlement sont respectées ; dans le cas contraire, l 'application de la méthode de la valeur transactionnelle sera rejetée ." iii) Quelles sont les dispositions prévues pour communiquer par écrit les motifs en question, si l 'importateur le demande ? (article 1.2 a)) L'article 15 du Règlement communautaire , adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 , réglement e l'"Influence des liens ". G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 2 - "Article 15. Influence des liens 1. Lorsque les liens entre l 'acheteur et le vendeur des marchandises importées ont eu une influence sur le prix convenu entre les parties, le déclarant est tenu de le faire savoir par l 'intermédiaire de la déclaration andine de la valeur ; dans ce cas, la méthode de la valeur transactionnelle ne pourra pas être appliquée et les marchandises importées seront évaluées à l 'aide des autres méthodes, en suivant l 'ordre d 'application établi dans les articles 3 et 4 de la Décision n° 571. 2. S'il n'y a pas d 'indication expresse à cet égard et que l 'administration des douanes a des motifs valables de considérer que les liens ont influencé le prix, elle communiquera par écrit à l 'importateur les raisons pour lesquelles el le considère la valeur transactionnelle comme inacceptable, en ménageant à celui-ci un délai raisonnable pour répondre et fournir des éléments de preuve qui démontrent, le cas échéant, que les liens n 'ont pas influencé le prix . Dans ce cas, il convient de tenir compte des dispositions des articles 16, 17 et 18 de la Décision n° 571 . 3. La démonstration du fait que les liens n 'ont pas influencé le prix pourra être apportée en fournissant des éléments de preuve permettant d 'appliquer l 'une des deux procédures ci -après : a) L'analyse des circonstances propres à la vente, c'est-à-dire des conditions particulières de la négociation qui ont déterminé le prix, et qui sont également valables en l 'absence de liens, pour des acheteurs indépendants, par exemple : cours obtenus auprès d 'autres vendeurs non liés, contrats de vente, barèmes de prix du vendeur, quantités acquises . Lorsqu 'elles analysent les circonstances de la transaction, les administrations des douanes doivent examiner les éléments ci-après : i. la façon do nt l'acheteur et le vendeur organisent leurs rapports commerciaux ; et ii. la façon dont le prix a été arrêté. S'il peut être prouvé que l 'acheteur et le vendeur, bien que liés, achètent et vendent l'un à l 'autre comme s 'ils n'étaient pas liés, il sera démo ntré que les liens n 'ont pas influencé le prix . Les administrations des douanes peuvent considérer que la démonstration considérée est apportée dans trois cas : i. le prix a été ajusté de manière conforme aux pratiques normales de fixation des prix dans la branche de production en question ; ou ii. le prix a été ajusté de manière conforme à la façon dont le vendeur arrête ses prix pour les ventes à des acheteurs qui ne lui sont pas liés ; ou iii. le prix est suffisant pour couvrir tous les coûts et assurer un bénéfice représentatif du bénéfice global réalisé par l 'entreprise sur une période représentative, pour des ventes de marchandises de la même espèce ou de la même nature . En tout état de cause, et sans que la requête n 'émane de l 'administration des douanes, l'importateur pourra demander à celle -ci d'engager une analyse des circonstances propres à la vente concernant les liens qu 'il maintient avec ses fournisseurs étrangers, en fournissant les renseignements nécessaires à cet effet . G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 3 - Lors de l 'analyse des circonstances propres à la vente, tout renseignement et tout document pertinents fournis par l 'importateur peuvent être utilisés sous réserve d'examen et d 'acceptation par l 'administration des douanes . Une étude sur les prix de cession pourra être considérée comme une source de renseignements, conformément aux dispositions du Commentaire 23.1 du Comité technique de l 'évaluation . b) L'utilisation d 'une valeur critère, comme il est indiqué dans l 'article ci -après, en vue de démontrer que la valeur déclar ée pour les marchandises satisfait à l'une quelconque des valeurs en douane considérées comme des valeurs critères au sens de l 'article 1:2 b) de l 'Accord de l 'OMC sur l 'évaluation en douane et que, par conséquent, elle est acceptable aux fins des disposit ions de l'article premier de cet Accord . 4. Une fois expiré le délai accordé sans que l 'importateur ait répondu, ou si les explications données s 'avèrent insuffisantes pour que l 'on puisse considérer la valeur transactionnelle comme acceptable, les autorités douanières, compte tenu de ce qui est prévu à l 'article 17 de la Décision n° 571, détermineront la valeur en douane des marchandises importées conformément aux méthodes secondaires, telles qu 'elles sont prévues dans le chapitre II du présent titre . 5. Lors de l 'examen du point de savoir si les liens ont influencé le prix, il convient de toujours prendre en considération des faits vérifiables et, en particulier, les principes énoncés au paragraphe 2 de la note interprétative relative à l 'article premier de l'Accord de l 'OMC sur l 'évaluation en douane ." iv) Comment l 'article premier, paragraphe 2 b), a -t-il été mis en œuvre ? L'alinéa o) de l'article 2 et les articles 16 (modifié par l 'article 3 de la Résolution n° 1828 de la Communauté andine de 2016) et 60 du Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 réglementent l'utilisation des valeurs critères prévues dans l 'Accord : "Article 2. Définitions Aux fins de l 'application des dispositions énoncées dans l 'Accord de l 'OMC sur l'évaluation en douane, dans la Décision n° 571 et dans le présent Règlement, les définitions ci -après sont adoptées en complément de celles qui figurent déjà dans l'Accord considéré . (…) o) Valeurs critères : Valeurs ind iquées ci -après, précédemment acceptées par les autorités douanières, se situant au même moment ou à peu près au même moment, utilisées à l 'initiative de l'importateur afin de déterminer si la première méthode d 'évaluation, dite de la "valeur transactionne lle" peut être acceptée, lorsqu 'une vente est réalisée entre personnes liées: i) valeur transactionnelle lors de ventes, à des acheteurs non liés, de marchandises identiques ou similaires pour l 'exportation à destination du même pays d 'importation ; ii) valeur en douane de marchandises identiques ou similaires, telle qu 'elle est déterminée par application de la méthode déductive ; iii) valeur en douane de marchandises identiques ou similaires, telle qu 'elle est déterminée par application de la méthode de la valeur calculée . Les valeurs mentionnées dans le présent alinéa sont utilisées uniquement à des fins de comparaison, en aucun cas pour se substituer à la valeur déclarée . "Article 16. Valeurs critères G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 4 - 1. Aux fins de la définition énoncée à l 'alinéa o) de l 'article 2 du présent Règlement, une valeur ne sera considérée comme un critère d 'évaluation que lorsqu 'elle aura été acceptée par les autorités douanières pour des marchandises identiques ou similaires nationalisées par d 'autres importateurs non liés au ve ndeur, pour autant que : a) La valeur en douane des marchandises identiques ou similaires utilisée pour la comparaison ait été déterminée selon la méthode de la valeur transactionnelle et se situe au moment ou à peu près au moment de l'exportation des marchand ises à évaluer à destination du territoire douanier communautaire . b) La valeur en douane des marchandises identiques ou similaires utilisée pour la comparaison ait été déterminée par application de la méthode déductive et se situe au moment ou à peu près au moment de la vente des marchandises à évaluer sur le territoire douanier communautaire . c) La valeur en douane des marchandises identiques ou similaires utilisée pour la comparaison ait été déterminée par application de la méthode de la valeur calculée et se situe au moment ou à peu près au moment de l 'importation des marchandises à évaluer . À cet effet, il sera tenu compte de la définition de l 'expression "à peu près au moment" énoncée à l 'alinéa e) de l 'article 2 du présent Règlement . Ne sera pas considérée comme une valeur critère, la valeur déterminée pour les marchandises importées conformément aux articles 2, 3 et 7 de l 'Accord de l 'OMC sur l'évaluation en douane . 2. Les valeurs critères ne pourront être utilisées que dans les cas où les importateurs sont li és au vendeur, exclusivement à des fins de comparaison pour parvenir à l 'acceptation de la valeur transactionnelle, sans préjudice des autres prescriptions énoncées à l 'article 5 du présent Règlement relatives à l'application de celle -ci, et pour autant qu e la valeur déclarée soit très proche de l'une des valeurs indiquées aux alinéas a), b) ou c) ci -dessus . 3. À aucun moment la valeur critère, dans le cadre de l 'article premier de l 'Accord de l'OMC sur l 'évaluation en douane, ne doit se substituer à la valeur déclarée . 4. Lorsqu 'il est satisfait à l 'une des valeurs critères, il n 'est pas nécessaire d'examiner l 'influence des liens sur le prix . Si l'administration des douanes est déjà en possession de renseignements suffisants pour être convaincue qu 'il est satisfait à l 'une des valeurs critères, ou lorsqu 'elle constate dans ses registres qu 'il existe une valeur en douane précédemment acceptée qu 'elle pourrait utiliser comme valeur critère, mais dont l 'importateur n 'a pas connaissance, la valeur critère consi dérée pourrait être utilisée pour établir l 'acceptabilité du prix en question, sans que l'importateur le demande . Dans ce cas, il ne serait pas nécessaire d 'exiger de l'importateur qu 'il apporte la démonstration qu 'il est satisfait à une valeur critère . 5. Pour l'application des valeurs critères, il sera tenu compte des ajustements au titre des différences entre les niveaux commerciaux, les quantités ou les éléments dont traite l 'article 20 du présent Règlement ." "Article 60. Valeurs acceptées par l 'administration des douanes . 1. Aux fins de l 'application des valeurs critères dont traite l 'article 16 du présent Règlement, des méthodes de la valeur transactionnelle de marchandises identiques et similaires et de la méthode de "dernier recours", une valeur sera G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 5 - considérée comme ayant été acceptée par les douanes, lorsqu 'il aura été établi qu'elle est conforme aux présupposés et aux prescriptions établis pour l'application de chacune des méthodes spécifiées dans l 'Accord de l 'OMC sur l'évaluation en douane . 2. Lorsque des antécédents en matière de valeurs en douane notoirement bas sont présentés aux douanes dans le but d 'être considérés comme des valeurs critères, ou comme des antécédents lors de l 'application des méthodes d'évaluation susmentionnées, l 'administr ation des douanes pourra engager une enquête en vue de les confirmer ou de les invalider . 3. Ne seront pas considérées comme acceptées les valeurs faisant l 'objet d 'une enquête ou d 'une étude en cours de réalisation, ou qui auront été invalidées à l'issue de celle -ci." b) Prix de marchandises perdues ou endommagées : Existe -t-il des dispositions ou des arrangements pratiques spéciaux en ce qui concerne l 'évaluation des marchandises perdues ou endommagées ? Oui. L'article 7 de la Résolution n° 1456 du Se crétariat général de la Communauté andine de 2012 et l'article 359 de la Résolution n° 0046 de la DIAN de 2019 réglementent l 'évaluation des marchandises avariées, endommagées ou détériorées . "Article 7. Marchandises avariées, endommagées ou détériorées La valeur en douane des marchandises qui, après acquisition mais avant importation, sont partiellement avariées, endommagées ou détériorées, mais ont une valeur résiduelle, sera déterminée sur la base du prix effectivement payé ou à payer pour ces marchandises au moment de leur acquisition ou, à défaut, sur la base d 'un prix de référence pour des marchandises identiques ou similaires, diminué d 'un montant proportionnel à l 'avarie, au dommage ou à la détérioration, dont la valeur pourra être étab lie sur la base de l 'un des critères ci -après : a) estimation d 'un expert en la matière, indépendant de l 'acheteur et du vendeur, les frais étant assumés par l 'importateur . b) coût budgétisé des réparations ou de la remise en état, et c) indemnité versée par la compagnie d 'assurance, le cas échéant . La valeur en douane des marchandises totalement avariées, endommagées ou détériorées sera déterminée sur la base du prix estimé par un expert en la matière, indépendant de l'acheteur et du vendeur, les frais étant ass umés par l 'importateur, ou le cas échéant, sur la base de la valeur établie par la compagnie d 'assurance ." "ARTICLE 359. V ALEUR EN DOUANE DES MARCHANDISES IMPORTÉES AVARIÉES, ENDOMMAGÉES OU DÉTÉRIORÉES . La valeur en douane des marchandises importées avarié es, endommagées ou détériorées sera calculée conformément à la procédure prévue à l'article 7 de la Résolution n° 1456 de la Communauté andine de 2012 ou à celle qui la modifie ou la remplace . À la valeur ainsi obtenue seront ajoutées ou déduites les dépenses prévues aux articles 20 et 33 du Règlement communautaire , adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014, ou de celle qui la modifie ou la remplace ." 2. Comment la disposition de l 'article 4 qui donne à l 'importateur la faculté d 'inverser l'ordre d 'application des articles 5 et 6 a -t-elle été mise en œuvre ? Le dernier alinéa de l 'article 4 de la Décision n° 571 de la Com munauté andine sur la valeur en douane des marchandises importées prévoit l 'inversion de l 'ordre d 'application des méthodes G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 6 - d'évaluation indiquées aux paragraphes 4 et 5 (méthode de la valeur déductive et méthode de la valeur calculée ), si l'importateur le demande et si l 'Administration des douanes l 'accepte . Cette option est mentionnée aussi à l 'article 3 du Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014. Jusqu'à présent, aucun importateur n 'a demandé l 'inversion de l 'ordre d 'application des articles 5 et 6 de l 'Accord . 3. Comm ent l'article 5, paragraphe 2, a -t-il été mis en œuvre? L'article 5 de la Décision n° 571 de la Com munauté andine sur la valeur en douane des marchandises importées prévoit l 'application de l 'article 5:2, que l 'importateur le demande ou non . Le Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 , se rapporte à ce sujet à l'alinéa b) du paragraphe 2) de l'article 45. 4. Comment l 'article 6, paragraphe 2, a -t-il été mis en œuvre ? L'article 47 du Règlement communautaire adopté par l 'intermédiaire de la Résolution n° 1684 du Secrétariat général de la Communauté andine de 2014 indique qu 'il doit être tenu compte des dispositions de l 'article 6 de l 'Accord et de sa note interprétative et que, dans tous les cas, le consentement du producteur et nécessaire . 5. Questions relatives à l 'article 7 : a) Quelles dispositions ont été prises pour déterminer la valeur en douane conformément à l 'article 7 ? Les articles 48 et 49 du Règlement communautaire adopt é par l 'intermédiaire de la Résolution n° 1684 de 2012 du Secrétariat général de la Communauté andine , la Résolution n° 1456 sur les cas particuliers d 'évaluation en douane de la Communauté andine et les articles 351 à 364 de la Résolution n° 0046 de 2019 de la DIAN ont établi des précisions concernant l 'application de la méthode de dernier recours . b) Quelles sont les dispositions prévues pour informer l 'importateur de la valeur en douane déterminée par application de l 'article 7 ? L'article 53 du Règlemen t communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 prévoit la communication à l 'importateur des doutes raisonnables survenus au sujet de la véracité ou de l 'exactitude de la valeur déclarée et des pièces justificatives , un délai raisonnable étant ménagé pour répondre . Une fois la décision finale adoptée , l'administration des douanes communiquera à l 'importateur les motifs qui la justifient . De même , des dispositions sont prévues dans le Titre 16 du Décret n° 1165 de 2019 et dans le Titre 14 de la Résolution n° 000046 de 2019 . c) Les interdictions énoncées à l 'article 7, paragraphe 2, sont -elles définies ? Oui, elles sont énoncées à l'article 49 du Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 201 4. 6. Qu'en est -il des options offertes par l 'article 8, paragraphe 2 ? En cas d 'application du système f.o.b., les prix sortie usine sont -ils aussi acceptés ? L'article 6 de la Décision n° 571 de la Communaut é andine a incorporé dans la valeur en douane tous les éléments énumérés au paragraphe 2 de l 'article 8 de l 'Accord . G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 7 - Conform ément à ce qui précède, la Colombie utilise comme base le prix c.a.f. et lui ajoute, le cas échéant, les éléments énumérés à l 'article 8:2 de l 'Accord . 7. Où le taux de change est -il publié, en conformité avec les prescriptions de l 'article 9, paragraphe 1 ? La disposition relative à la monnaie est établie à l'article 21 de la Décision n° 571 de 2003 . De même, l'article 15 du Décret n° 1165 de 2019 indique les conversions monétaires . Les taux de change présents et passés peuvent être consultés sur la page Web de la Direction des impôts et des douanes nationales , à l 'adresse suivante : https://www.dian.gov.co/dian/cifras/Paginas/TRM.aspx . 8. Quelles mesures ont été prises pour assurer, en conformité avec les prescriptions de l'article 10, le caractère confidentiel de certains renseignements ? L'article 63 du Règlement communautaire adopt é en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 dispo se que, lorsque des renseignements fournis aux fins de l'évaluation en douane , qu'ils aient un caractère confidentiel ou qu 'ils soient fournis à ce titre , ils ne seront pas divulgués par l 'autorité douanière sans l 'autorisation expresse de la personne ou du gouvernement qui les aura fournis , sauf sur injonction des autorités judiciaires . 9. Questions relatives à l 'article 11 : a) Quels sont les droits d 'appel de l 'importateur ou de toute autre personne ? L'article 65 du Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 , dispose que les pays membres de la Communauté andine devront prévoir un droit d 'appel dans leur législation nationale . S'agissant de la détermination de la valeur en douane, la législation douanière colombienne reconnaît le droit de recours en réexamen , qui implique l 'épuisement des recours administratifs . b) Comment l 'appelant sera -t-il informé de ses droits à un nouvel appel ? Outre le recours en réexamen, il existe en Colombie un droit de recours auprès de la juridiction du contentieux administratif, qui constitue un recours s'ajoutant à celui qui a été indiqué dans la réponse à la quest ion précédente . 10. Fournir des renseignements sur la publication, conformément à l 'article 12 : a) i) des lois nationales applicables en l 'espèce ; Elles sont publiées au Journal officiel , qui peut être consulté à l 'adresse suivante : http://svrpubindc.imprenta.gov.ca/diario/ . ii) des règlements concernant l 'application de l 'Accord ; Ils sont publi és au Journal officiel , qui peut être consulté à l 'adresse suivante : http://svrpubindc.imprenta.gov.ca/diario/ . iii) des décisions judiciaires ; et Elles sont publié s dans la Gazette de la Cour constitutionnelle . administratives d 'application générale relatives à l 'Accord ; Elles sont publiées au Journal officiel , qui peut être consulté à l 'adresse suivante : http://svrpubindc.imprenta.gov.co/diario/ . G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 8 - iv) des lois générales ou particulières dont il est fait mention dans les règles de mise en œuvre ou d 'application de l 'Accord ; Ces lois sont publiées au Journal officiel , qui peut être consulté à l 'adresse suivante : http://svrpubindc.imprenta.gov.co/diario/ . b) De nouvelles règles doivent -elles être publiées ? Sur quels sujets porteraient -elles? Un décret national qu i va adopter une nouvelle réglementation douanière est sur le point d 'être publié ; il inclura un chapitre relatif à l 'évaluation en douane qui fera ensuite l 'objet d 'un règlement sous la forme d 'une Résolution de la DIAN . Ces règles seront conformes aux dispositions de l 'Accord de l 'OMC sur l 'évaluation en douane et des règles communautaire s de la CAN . 11. Questions relatives à l 'article 13 : a) Comment est -il tenu compte, dans la législation nationale, de l 'obligation énoncée à l'article 13 (dernière phrase) ? L'article 62 du Règlement communautaire adopt é par l 'intermédiaire de la Résolution n° 1684 du Secrétariat général de la Communauté andine de 2014 , le paragraphe 5 de l'article 185 du Décret n° 1165 de 2019 et l'article 347 de la Résolution n° 0046 de 2019 de la DIAN prévoient la possibilité, pour l 'importateur, de constitu er une garantie lorsque l'autorité douanière doute de la valeur déclarée ou lorsqu 'il est nécessaire de différer l 'évaluation définitive des marchandises . b) Des explications complémentaires ont -elles été données ? Non. 12. Questions relatives à l 'article 16 : a) La législation nationale contient -elle une disposition stipulant que l 'administration des douanes est tenue d 'exposer par écrit comment la valeur en douane a été détermi née? Les articles 680 à 684 du Décret n° 1165 de 2019 énonce les modalités et co nditions relatives à l'établissement de requêtes douanières spéciales dans un délai de 30 jours après qu'une infraction administrative douanière présumée a été constatée . La requête spéciale doit comporter , entre autres choses, la proposition de liquidation officielle établie par application d'une méthode d 'évaluation en douane , qui est égalemen t précisée dan s le document . b) Existe -t-il d'autres règlements relatifs aux demandes présentées à cet effet? Si, ar ticles 639 y 640 de la Résolution 000046 de 2019 . 13. Comment les notes interprétatives de l 'Accord ont -elles été incorporées dans la législation ? L'article 2 de la Décision n° 571 de la Com munauté andine établit l 'obligation pour les pays Membres d'évaluer les marchandises à des fins douanières en appliquant les articles 1er à 7 de l 'Accord de l'OMC sur l 'évaluation en douane , ainsi que les notes interprétatives y relatives . De même, l 'article 4 signale cette même disposition dans la note générale figurant à l 'Annexe 1 de l'Accord . Les articles 320 et 321 du Décret n° 1165 de 2019 établissent juridiquement la détermination de la valeur en douane et ainsi que la primauté des normes et leur application obligatoire . 14. Comment ont été appliquées les dispositions de la Décision relative au traitement des montants des intérêts lors de la détermination de la valeur en douane des marchandises importées ? G/VAL/N/2/COL/3 - 9 - L'article 22 de la Décision n° 571 de la Communauté andine prévoit que les instruments du Comité de l'évaluation en douane de l'OMC et du Comité technique de l 'évaluation en douane de l'OMD seront pris en considération pour l 'interprétation et l 'application des règles relatives à la valeur énoncées dans l 'Accord . De même, l'alinéa e) de l'article 33 du Règlement communautaire adopté en vertu de la Résolution n° 1684 de la Communauté andine de 2014 dispose que la valeur en douan e n'inclut pas les montants des intérêts pour autant que les conditions prévues dans la Décision n° 3. 1 du Comité de l'évaluation en douane de l 'OMC soient satisfaites . 15. Comment ont été appliquées, pour les pays concernés, les dispositions du paragraphe 2 de la Décision sur l 'évaluation des supports informatiques de logiciels destinés à des équipements de traitement des données ? L'article 353 de la Résolution n° 0046 de 2019 de la DIAN d étermin e l'application des dispositions énoncées dans l'Instrument du Comité technique sur l'évaluation des supports informatiques qui comportent des données et des instructions (logiciels) destinées à des équipements de traitement de données . __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NARE188.pdf

s_G_SPS_NARE188

G/SPS/N/ARE/188, G/SPS/N/BHR/209 , G/SPS/N/KWT/60, G/SPS/N/OMN/106 , G/SPS/N/QAT/110, G/SPS/N/SAU/414 , G/SPS/N/YEM/51 9 de enero de 2020 (20-0196) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN 1. Miembro que notifica : EMIRATOS ÁRABES UNIDOS, REINO DE BAHREIN, ESTADO DE KUWAIT, OMÁN, QATAR, REINO DE LA ARABIA SAUDITA, YEMEN Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable : Saudi Food and Drug Authority (Organismo de Productos Alimenticios y Farmacéuticos de la Arabia Saudita) 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC ; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : Carne, productos cárnicos o de origen animal (ICS : 67.120). 4. Regiones o países que podrían verse afectados, en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [X] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [ ] Regiones o países específicos: 5. Título del documento notificado : Proyecto de Reglamento Técnico del Reino de la Arabia Saudita y el Consejo de Cooperación del Golfo, Beef, buffalo, mutton and goat meat chilled and frozen (Carne refrigerada y congela da de vacuno, búfalo, ovino y caprino) . Idioma(s) : árabe. Número de páginas : 15. https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/SPS/SAU/20_0098_00_x.pdf 6. Descripción del contenido : El Proyecto de Reglamento Técnico notificado es aplicable a la carne refrigerada y congelada de vacuno, búfalo, ovino y caprino. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser : [X] inocuidad de los alimentos, [ ] sanidad animal, [ ] preservación de los vegetales, [ ] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [ ] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. 8. ¿Existe una norma internacional pertinente ? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [ ] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejemplo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animales Acuáticos) : [ ] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : [X] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? G/SPS/N/ARE/188 • G/SPS/N/BHR/209 • G/SPS/N/KWT/60 • G/SPS/N/OMN/106 • G/SPS/N/QAT/110 • G/SPS/N/SAU/414 • G/SPS/N/YEM/51 - 2 - [ ] Sí [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible, en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional: 9. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s) en que están disponibles: − Egyptian standards ; ES 3602 : 2008, Chilled meat. − Egyptian standar ds; "Fresh Meat", Chilled meat, ES 4334/2008. − FSIS Directive 7120.1 - Safe and Suitable, Ingredients used in the Production of Meat, Poultry, and Egg Products . 10. Fecha propuesta de adopción (día/mes/año) : No se ha determinado. Fecha propuesta de publicación (día/mes/año) : No se ha determinado. 11. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : [X] Seis meses a partir de la fecha de publicación, y/o (día/mes/año) : [ ] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : [X] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : 9 de marzo de 2020 Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación , [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Saudi Food and Drug Authority (Organismo de Productos Alimenticios y Farmacéuticos de la Arabia Saudita) SFDA - 4904 North Ring branch rd - Hitteen Dist Unit Number (1) - Riad 13513 - 7148 Teléfono : +(966 11) 275 9222, Ext. 3158 Fax: +(966 11) 210 9825 Correo electrónico : SPSEP.Food@sfda.gov.sa Sitio web: http://www.sfda.gov.sa 13. Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Saudi Food and Drug Authority (Organismo de Productos Alimenticios y Farmacéuticos de la Arabia Saudita) SFDA - 4904 North Ring branch rd - Hitteen Dist Unit Number (1) - Riad 13513 - 7148 Teléfono : +(966 11) 275 9222, Ext . 3158 Fax: +(966 11) 210 9825 Correo electrónico : SPSEP.Food@sfda.gov.sa Sitio web: http://www.sfda.gov.sa

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_MA_W168.pdf

r_G_MA_W168

G/MA/W/168 15 avril 2021 (21-3223) Page: 1/25 Comité de l'accès aux marchés RÉSUMÉ DES RESTRICTIONS À L'EXPORTATION ET DES MESURES DE FACILITATION DES ÉCHANGES NOTIFIÉES EN RAPPORT AVEC LA PANDÉMIE DE COVID -19 RAPPORT DU SECRÉTARIAT1 1 INTRODUCTION 1. À sa réunion des 12 et 1 6 novembre 2020, le Comité de l'accès aux marchés a demandé au Secrétariat d'établir un nouveau rapport résumant les renseignements factuels figurant dans les notifications et autres communications qui avaient été présentées au Comité par les Membres au sujet des mesures liées au comme rce prises en réponse à la pandémie de COVID -19.2 Par conséquent, le présent rapport vise à résumer les renseignements pertinents sur les prohibitions et restrictions à l'exportation qui ont été notifiées par les Membres au titre de la Décision de 2012 su r les procédures de notification des restrictions quantitatives3 (la Décision), ainsi que d'autres communications contenant des renseignements sur les mesures de facilitation des échanges prises par les Membres en réponse à la pandémie . Le rapport compren d tous les renseignements disponibles au 1 5 avril 2021. La liste complète des notifications et communications qui ont été analysées dans le présent rapport figure dans le document G/MA/W/157/Rev.2. 2 PROHIBITIONS ET RESTRICTIONS À L'EXPORTATION NOTIFIÉES 2. À la date du présent rapport, un total de 48 mesures prohibant ou restreignant les exportations en raison de la pandémie de COVID -19 avaient été notifiées par 29 Membres .4 L'annexe 1 donne un aperçu de la teneur de ces communications . En vue de faciliter l'a nalyse de ces mesures et d'en permettre la comparaison, certains éléments y figurant ont été uniformisés (par exemple le type de mesure, les produits visés, la justification au regard de l'OMC, etc.) . Aux fins du présent rapport, une mesure est comptée séparément chaque fois qu'elle peut être distinguée clairement d'une autre mesure (par exemple s'il existe deux instruments juridiques nationaux clairement distincts) . Aucune prorogation, modification ou suppression de la mesure initiale n'a été co mptabilisée comme une nouvelle mesure. 3. Le Secrétariat tient à souligner que les renseignements sur les prohibitions et restrictions à l'exportation présentés dans le présent rapport restent incomplets car ils se limitent aux mesures qui ont été notifiées p ar les Membres conformément à la Décision . Des renseignements additionnels compilés par le Secrétariat de l'OMC dans le contexte du rapport de suivi du commerce5 donnent à penser que 10 autres Membres et plusieurs pays non Membres de l 'OMC ont également p ris des mesures de restriction à l'exportation semblables en réponse à la pandémie de COVID -19 qui, à la date du présent rapport, n'avaient pas encore été notifiées au titre de la Décision. 1 Le présent document a été établi par le Secrétariat sous sa propre responsabilité et est sans préjudice des positions des Membres ni de leurs droits et obligations dans le cadre de l'OMC. 2 G/MA/M/73, paragraphes 7.16 et 7.17. 3 G/L/59/Rev.1. 4 En comptant l'Union européenne comme un seul Membre. 5 La section du site Web de l'OMC consacrée à la COVID -19 comprend une sous -section intitulée "COVID -19: mesures affectant le commerce des marchandises". Voir https://www.wto.org/french/tratop_f/covid19_f/trade_related_goods_measure_f.htm . G/MA/W/168 - 2 - 2.1 Types de mesures 4. La majorité des mesures de restriction à l'exportation qui ont été prises par les Membres en réponse à la COVID -19 ont pris la forme de régimes de licences d'exportation non automatiques (38,5 %), suivis par des interdictions ou prohibitions complètes à l'exportation (34,6 %) et des prohibitions co nditionnelles (25 %). Il y a aussi une mesure qui prend la forme d'un contingent global pour les exportations . Voir le graphique n° 1. Graphique n° 1 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation e n réponse à la COVID -19, par type de mesure (pourcentage) Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 2.2 Chronologie des mesures prises 5. La grande majorité des mesures de prohibition et de restriction à l'exportation notifiées ont été prises par les Membres entre février et avril 2020 (40 des 48 mesures) . Cette période coïncide avec la déclaration de l'état de pandémie faite par l'Organisation mondiale de la santé, et les confinements et autres mesures sanitaires imposés par les Membres en réponse à la COVID -19. Il apparaî trait qu'aucune mesure de restriction à l'exportation n'a été prise entre juillet 2021 et janvier 2021, alors que deux nouvelles mesures ont été prises . Voir le graphique n° 2. Graphique n° 2 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation en réponse à la COVID -19, chronologie des mesures prises Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 3 29 8 1 2 - - - - - -2 3 Fév. 2020 Mars 2020 Avril 2020 Mai 2020 Juin 2020 Juill. 2020 Août 2020 Sept. 2020 Oct. 2020 Nov. 2020 Déc. 2020 Janv. 2021 Non spécifiéNombre de mesuresG/MA/W/168 - 3 - 2.3 Durée des mesures 6. Une grande partie des mesures de restriction à l'exportation notifiées par les Membres ne contiennent pas de renseignements complets sur leur durée . Pour 23 mesures, les Membres ont indiqué les dates auxquelles celles -ci avaient été prises, mais sans indiquer la durée prévue ou sans confirmer ultéri eurement que la mesure avait expiré . Pour les 25 mesures au sujet desquelles des renseignements sont disponibles, la majorité des restrictions ont été en place entre 181 et 270 jours (c'est -à-dire entre 6 et 9 mois), et 7 mesures ont été en place pendant m oins de 90 jours . Voir le graphique n° 3. Graphique n° 3 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation en réponse à la COVID -19, par durée des mesures Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 2.4 Chronologie d u nombre de mesures en vigueur, par date 7. Sur la base des renseignements concernant les dates auxquelles les mesures ont été prises (section 2.1) et leur durée (section 2.3), il est possible de suivre le nombre de mesures qui étaient en vigueur à une date d onnée et leur évolution . Les renseignements disponibles donnent à penser que, lorsque le pic a été atteint le 2 4 avril 2020, 38 mesures de restriction à l'exportation étaient en place et que ce nombre a régulièrement diminué depuis . Il apparaît qu'environ 21 mesures de restriction à l'exportation étaient toujours en place en avril 2021, soit 1 an après que le pic a été atteint . Voir le graphique n° 4. Graphique n° 4 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation en réponse à la COVID -19, statut actuel des mesures Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 7 48 4 223 < de 90 jours 90 à 180 jours 181 à 270 jours 271 à 365 jours > de 365 jours Non spécifiéNombre de mesures 0510152025303540 févr.-20 mars-20 avr.-20 mai-20 juin-20 juil.-20 août-20 sept.-20 oct.-20 nov.-20 déc.-20 janv.-21 févr.-21 mars-21 avr.-21Nombre de mesures en vigueur à cette date24 avril 2020G/MA/W/168 - 4 - 2.5 Produits visés 8. La majorité des mesures notifiées par les Membres prohibaient ou restreignaient l'exportation de ce qu'il était convenu d'appeler les équipements de protection individuelle (EPI), qui comprenaient les dispositifs de protection du visage et des yeux (26 mesures), les vêtements de protection (19 mesures) et les gants (19 mesures) . Parmi les autres produits soumis à des restrictions figuraient les désinfectants, y compris l'alcool (15 mesures), les produits pharmaceutiques (14 mesures), différents types de fournitures médicales (13 mesures), le matéri el médical y compris les appareils respiratoires mécaniques (11 mesures) et d'autres produits . Voir le graphique n° 5. Graphique n° 5 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation en réponse à la COVID -19, par produits visés Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 2.6 Justifications citées au regard de l'OMC 9. Presque la moitié des mesures notifiées qui ont été prises ont été justifiées par les Membres en citant à la fois les articles XI:2 a) et XX:b du GATT de 1994, qui concernent les mesures appliquées temporairement pour prévenir une situation critique due à une pénurie de produits alimentaires ou d'autres produits essentiels, ou pour remédier à cette situation, et les mesures nécessaires à la protection de la santé des personnes et des animaux ou à la préservation des végétaux, respectivement . Les Membres ont exclusivement cité l'article XI:2 a) du GATT de 1994 pour 31 % des mesures et fait référence à certains objectifs de politique générale sans mentionner de dispositions spécifiques de l'OMC dans les autres cas . Voir le graphique n° 6. 26 19 19 15 14 13 11 5 4 3 2 1Protection du visage et des yeux Vêtements de protection Gants Désinfectants Produits pharmaceutiques Autres fournitures médicales Appareils et dispositifs médicaux Produits alimentaires Trousses d'essai de la COVID-19 Vaccins Savon Papier hygiéniqueÉquipement de protection individuelleG/MA/W/168 - 5 - Graphique n° 6 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation en réponse à la COVID -19, par justification citée au re gard de l'OMC Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 2.7 Statut actuel des mesures 10. Sur la base des renseignements notifiés jusqu'à présent, il apparaîtrait qu'un peu plus de la moitié des mesures de prohibition et de restriction à l'exportation étaient toujours en vi gueur le 14 avril 2021, alors que les autres mesures étaient arrivées à expiration comme cela avait été notifié initialement (27 %) ou que le Membre avait présenté une notification informant les autres Membres que la mesure avait été supprimée (21 %). Voir le graphique n° 7. Graphique n° 7 – Notifications de restrictions quantitatives comportant des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation en réponse à la COVID -19, statut actuel des mesures Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. Article XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT 46%Article XI:2 a) du GATT 31%Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes et intérêts essentiels de sécurité, entre autres choses 2%Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses 19% Article XX b) du GATT 2% Suppression notifiée 21% En vigueur 52%Arrivée à expiration 27%G/MA/W/168 - 6 - 3 APERÇU GÉNÉRAL DES COMMUNICA TIONS CONCERNANT LES MESURES DE FACILITATION DES ÉCHANGES 11. L'annexe 2 du présent rapport contient un résumé de la teneur de toutes les communications concernant les mesures de facilitation des échanges qui ont été prises en réponse à la COVID -19 et présenté es au Comité de l'accès aux marchés . Contrairement aux prohibitions et restrictions à l'exportation décrites dans la section 1, qui ont été présentées conformément à une prescription de notification, ces communications ont été présentées unilatéralement pa r les Membres à des fins de transparence . À la date du présent rapport, un total de 21 de ces communications comportant 34 mesures avaient été présentées par 11 Membres . En vue de faciliter l'analyse et de permettre une comparaison, et lorsque les renseign ements disponibles le permettaient, certains des éléments figurant dans les communications ont été uniformisés (par exemple les types de mesures) . Des renseignements additionnels compilés par le Secrétariat de l'OMC dans le contexte du rapport de suivi du commerce6 donnent à penser que plusieurs autres mesures de facilitation des échanges ont été prises par les Membres mais n'ont pas été prises en compte.7 3.1 Types de mesures 12. Comptant pour environ 64,7 %, la majorité des mesures de facilitation des échanges qui ont été communiquées au Comité concernaient des mesures fiscales visant à réduire le prix des importations essentielles, les rendant ainsi plus abordables et plus disponibles . Par exemple, plus d'un tiers de ces mesures supprimaient ou suspend aient le paiement des droits de douane à l'importation de produits jugés essentiels pour lutter contre la pandémie de COVID -19, ou prévoyaient une exonération du paiement de ces droits (35,3 %). En outre, plusieurs Membres ont supprimé ou suspendu le paieme nt d'autres taxes et/ou droits, tels que la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée, sur ces produits essentiels, ou ont prévu une exonération du paiement de ces autres taxes et/ou droits (17,6 %). En vue de fournir des liquidités aux importateurs, certains Membres ont également décidé de reporter le paiement des droits de douane et d'autres taxes sur tous les produits importés (5,9% des mesures) . En plus de ces mesures fiscales, environ 23,8 % de ces mesures de facilitation des échanges visaient à simplifier ou à facilit er différentes procédures douanières, y compris, par exemple, en introduisant des procédures de dédouanement simplifiées ou accélérées (11,8 %), telles que l'établissement de circuits verts pour prioriser l'importation de produits essentiels, et la simplifi cation ou l'élimination de certaines procédures (11,8 %). Enfin, environ 11,8 % des mesures notifiées ont trait à d'autres catégories, telles que l'établissement de procédures spéciales pour l'importation de dons (marchandises de première nécessité) ou l'engagement de s'abstenir d'imposer des prohibitions ou des restrictions à l'expo rtation de produits essentiels. 6 La section du site Web de l'OMC consacrée à la COVID -19 comprend une sous -section intitulée "COVID -19: mesures affectant le commerce des marchandises". Voir https://www.wto.org/french/tratop_f/covid19_f/trade_related_goods_measure_f.htm . 7 Pour de plus amples renseignements, voir Secrétariat de l'OMC: "Mesures commerciales utilisées par les Membres de l'OMC pour accélérer l'accès aux produits et services médicaux essentiels dans le contexte de la COVID -19", note d'information du 18 septembre 2020. Voir https://www.wto.org/french/tratop_f/covid19_f/services_report_16092020_f.pdf . G/MA/W/168 - 7 - Graphique n° 8 – Mesures de facilitation des échanges liées à la COVID -19 communiquées au Comité, par types de mesures Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 3.2 Durée des mesures 13. La majorité des mesures de facilitation des échanges qu i ont été communiquées au Comité avaient un caractère temporaire, mais pour 14 des 34 mesures le Membre n'a pas fourni de renseignements sur la durée prévue . Pour ce qui est des mesures au sujet desquelles les Membres ont fourni des renseignements, la majo rité d'entre elles semblaient avoir été en place entre 180 et 365 jours (c'est -à-dire entre 6 mois et 1 an), une poignée de mesures ayant une durée plus courte ou plus longue . La mesure ayant la durée la plus courte a été en place pendant 84 jours, tandis que celle ayant la durée la plus longue sera en place pendant 425 jours . Il convient également de mentionner que certaines mesures ont été qualifiées de mesures de facilitation des échanges "permanentes" pour promouvoir le commerce de produits essentiels d ans la lutte contre la pandémie de COVID -19. Voir le graphique n° 9. Graphique n° 9 – Mesures de facilitation des échanges liées à la COVID -19 communiquées au Comité, par durée des mesures Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 136 5 1414 < de 90 jours 90 à 180 jours 181 à 270 jours 271 à 365 jours > de 365 jours Permanent Non spécifiéNombre de mesures Durée des mesuresG/MA/W/168 - 8 - 3.3 Produits visés 14. Il apparaît que les principales catégories de produits visés par les mesures de facilitation des échanges sont de nature semblable aux produits qui ont fait l'objet de prohibitions et restrictions à l'exportation (voir la section 2) . Neuf des 11 Membres qui ont fourni des ren seignements ont pris des mesures visant à simplifier l'importation d'EPI, qui comprend les catégories des équipements de protection du visage et des yeux (par exemple les masques de protection, les écrans faciaux et les lunettes de protection), des vêtemen ts de protection et des gants . Viennent ensuite des mesures relatives à différents types de désinfectants, y compris différents types d'alcool utilisés dans la préparation de ces produits . Voir le graphique n° 10. Graphique n° 10 – Mesures de facilitation des échanges liées à la COVID -19 communiquées au Comité, par types de produits (nombre de Membres) Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 3.4 Statut actuel 15. Bien qu'il n'y ait pas d'information sur le statut actuel de près d'un tiers des mesures de l'analyse, les renseignements figurant dans ces documents donnent à penser qu'environ 44 % de ces mesures sont arrivées à expiration et que 27 % sont toujours en vigueur plus d'un an après le début de la pandémie de COVID -19. Voir le graphique n° 11. Graphique n° 11 – Mesures de facilitation des échanges liées à la COVID -19 communiquées au Comité, par statut actuel des mesures Source: Secrétariat de l'OMC. 9 8 7 8 6 6 5 4 3 3 2 1 5 4 2Protection du visage et des… Vêtements de protection Gants Désinfectants Appareils et dispositifs… Autres fournitures médicales Savon Trousses d'essai de la… Produits alimentaires Produits pharmaceutiques Vaccins Papier hygiénique Autres produits Tous les produits Non définisÉquipement de protection individuelle Arrivée à expiration 44%En vigueur 27%Renseignements insuffisants 29% G/MA/W/168 - 9 - ANNEXE 1 PROHIBITIONS ET RESTRICTIONS À L'EXPORTATION NOTIFIÉES EN RAPPORT AVEC LA PANDÉMIE DE COVID -19 Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Justification citée Notification de prorogation/modification Dernier statut notifié1 Albanie CP-X 08/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Produits pharmaceutiques; - Papier hygiénique; - Autres fournitures médicales Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/ALB/1/Add.1 : RQ 1 Arabie saoudite, Royaume d' P-X 04.02.2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Produits pharmaceutiques; - Vêtements de protection; - Désinfectants; - Vaccins Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/SAU/1: RQ 1 Argentine NAL-X 28/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection; - Désinfectants; - Autres fournitures médicales Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/ARG/2: RQ 19 NAL-X 20/03/2020 132 - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux Article XI:2 a) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/ARG/2: RQ 19 Australie CP-X 18/03/2020 256 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection; - Désinfectants Article XI:2 a) du GATT Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/AUS/4/Add.1 Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/AUS/4/Add.2 Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/AUS/4/Add.3 : RQ 1 Bahreïn, Royaume de P-X, NAL-X 25/02/2020 406 - Protection du visage et des yeux Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BHR/1/Rev.1/Add.1 : RQ 1-5 Bangladesh P-X 12/03/2020 21 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Désinfectants Article XI:2 a) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BGD/1 : RQ 1-2 Brésil CP-X 24/04/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Vêtements de protection; - Autres fournitures médicales Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BRA/2/Add.1 : RQ 1 1 Le membre de phrase "en vigueur conformément à" indique soit qu'aucune date d'expiration n'a été donnée soit que celle -ci n'a pas encore été atteinte. Le membre de phrase "supprimée conformément à" indique que la mesure a été supprimée à la date butoir indiquée dans la notifi cation. Le membre de phrase "suppression notifiée" indique que la suppression de la mesure a été notifiée. G/MA/W/168 - 10 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Justification citée Notification de prorogation/modification Dernier statut notifié1 NAL-X 18/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19; - Désinfectants; - Autres fournitures médicales Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BRA/2/Add.1: RQ 2 NAL-X 20/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BRA/2/Add.1: RQ 3 CP-X 29/06/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Vêtements de protection; - Autres fournitures médicales Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BRA/2/Add.2: RQ 1 NAL-X 01/01/2021 Non spécifiée - Autres fournitures médicales Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BRA/2/Add.2: RQ 2 NAL-X 09/06/2020 Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/BRA/2/Add.2: RQ 3 Colombie CP-X 23/03/2020 184 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Produits pharmaceutiques; - Désinfectants; - Savon; - Autres fournitures médicales Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/COL/1: RQ 1 CP-X 23/03/2020 184 - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Vêtements de protection; Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/COL/1: RQ 2 CP 07/04/2020 61 - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/COL/1/Add.1: RQ 1 Corée, Rép. de CP-X, P-X 06/03/2020 217 - Protection du visage et des yeux Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/KOR/2/Add.2 Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/KOR/2/Add.3 Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/KOR/2/Add.4 Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/KOR/2/Add.5 Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/KOR/3/Add.1 G/MA/W/168 - 11 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Justification citée Notification de prorogation/modification Dernier statut notifié1 Costa Rica NAL-X 10/04/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection; - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Modification notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/CRI/3/Add.2 En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/CRI/4 : QR 18 Égypte P-X 28/03/2020 283 - Produits alimentaires Article XI:2 a) du GATT Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.1 G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.2 Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.2: RQ 1 P-X 17/03/2020 185 - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.1 Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.2 P-X 17/03/2020 184 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection; - Autres fournitures médicales Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.1 Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EGY/1/Rev.1/Add.2 Équateur P-X 11/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants2; - Produits pharmaceutiques2; - Vêtements de protection2; - Désinfectants2; - Savon2; - Autres fournitures médicales2 Article XX b) du GATT En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/ECU/1 : RQ 2 États-Unis NAL-X 07/04/2020 449 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection; - Autres fournitures médicales Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes et intérêts essentiels de sécurité, entre autres choses Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/USA/4/Add.2 Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/USA/5/Add.1 En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/USA/5/A dd.1: RQ 1 Géorgie CP-X 03/04/2020 Non spécifiée - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19; - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Vêtements de protection; - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/GEO/2/Add.2 En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/GEO/2/Add.2 : RQ 1 2 Cette catégorie de produits n'a été interdite à l'exportation que jusqu'au 25 juin 2020. G/MA/W/168 - 12 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Justification citée Notification de prorogation/modification Dernier statut notifié1 Hong Kong, Chine CP-X Plusieurs dates au deuxième trimestre de 2020 365 - Protection du visage et des yeux Article XI:2 a) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/HKG/5 : RQ 28 Israël NAL-X 04/05/2020 210 - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19; - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Vêtements de protection; - Désinfectants; - Autres fournitures médicales Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/ISR/1/Add.1 Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/ISR/1/Add.2 Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/ISR/1/Add.2 : RQ 1 Macédoine du Nord P-X 20/03/2020 41 - Produits alimentaires Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/MKD/1 : RQ 1 Moldova, Rép. de P-X 11/03/2020 173 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/MDA/1/Add.2: RQ 1 Norvège NAL-X 15/03/2020 72 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/NOR/1/Add.1 : RQ 1 Paraguay NAL-X 17/03/2020 365 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Modification notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/PRY/1/Add.1 Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/PRY/1/Add.1 : RQ 1 Pérou NAL-X 09/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Vêtements de protection; - Autres fournitures médicales Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/PER/2 : RQ 1 République kirghize P-X 22/03/2020 184 - Produits alimentaires; - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/KGZ/1/Add.1: RQ 1 Royaume -Uni3 CP-X Non spécifié Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 1 3 Le Royaume -Uni s'est retiré de l'Union européenne le 1er février 2020. Pendant la période de transition, qu i prend fin le 31 décembre 2020, le droit de l'Union, à quelques exceptions limitées près, reste applicable au Royaume -Uni et sur son territoire. G/MA/W/168 - 13 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Justification citée Notification de prorogation/modification Dernier statut notifié1 Suisse NAL-X 16/03/2020 97 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Produits pharmaceutiques; - Vêtements de protection Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/CHE/3 : RQ 19 Thaïlande P-X 26/03/2020 35 - Produits alimentaires Article XI:2 a) du GATT Modification notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/THA/2/Add.3 Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/THA/2/Add.3: RQ 1 P-X 05/02/2020 365 - Protection du visage et des yeux Article XI:2 a) du GATT - Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/THA/2/Add.2: RQ 2 Turquie NAL-X 04/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/TUR/2/Add.1: RQ 1 NAL-X 18/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Vêtements de protection Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/TUR/2/Add.1: RQ 2 Ukraine NAL-X, P-X 14/03/2020 140 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/UKR/4/Add.5 Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/UKR/4/Add.6 Supprimée conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/UKR/4/Add.6: RQ 1 NAL-X, P-X 25/03/2020 51 - Désinfectants Articles XI:2 a) et XX b) du GATT - Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/UKR/4/Add.2 Union européenne NAL-X 15/03/2020 71 - Protection du visage et des yeux; - Gants; - Vêtements de protection Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses Modification et prorogation notifiées: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.2 Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3 Union européenne NAL-X 31/01/2021 30/06/2021 - Vaccins Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses Prorogation notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EU/5/Add.2 Modification notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/EU/5/Add.3 En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/5/Add.2: RQ 1 G/MA/QR/N/EU/5/Add.3: RQ 1 G/MA/W/168 - 14 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Justification citée Notification de prorogation/modification Dernier statut notifié1 Union européenne: Chypre4 CP-X Non spécifié Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 1 Union européenne: Estonie3 P-X Non spécifié Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 2 Union européenne: France3 P-X 11/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 3 Union européenne: Grèce3 P-X 13/04/2020 Non spécifiée - Produits pharmaceutiques; - Vaccins Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 4 Union européenne: République slovaque3 CP-X 16/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19; - Produits pharmaceutiques; - Autres fournitures médicales Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 6 Union européenne: Roumanie3 CP-X 23/04/2020 Non spécifiée - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux; - Produits pharmaceutiques Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes, entre autres choses - En vigueur conformément à: G/MA/QR/N/EU/4/Add.3: RQ 5 Viet Nam GQ-X 10.04.2020 20 - Produits alimentaires Article XI:2 a) du GATT - Suppression notifiée: G/MA/QR/N/VNM/1 : RQ 1 4 Mesure prise uniquement par ce Membre de l'Union européenne. G/MA/W/168 - 15 - ANNEXE 2 MESURES DE FACILITATION DES ÉCHANGES RELATIVES À LA PANDÉMIE DE COVID -19 COMMUNIQUÉES AU COMITÉ DE L'ACCÈS AUX MARCHÉS Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué Australie - Concession tarifaire temporaire (élimination des droits de douane) (G/MA/W/152) 01/05/2020 425 jours (jusqu'au 30/06/2021) Produits médicaux ou d'hygiène pour lutter contre la COVID -19, y compris: - Protection du visage et des yeux - Gants - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants - Savon - Autres fournitures médicales (milieu de transport viral) Le 29 /07/2020, les mesures ont été prorogées jusqu'au 31/12/2020 (G/MA/W/152/Add.1) Le 14 /12/2020, les mesures ont été prorogées jusqu'au 30/06/2021 (G/MA/W/165) En vigueur - Remboursements pour les droits de douane acquittés sur les marchandises prescrites importées à compter du 1.02.2020 (G/MA/W/152) 01/05/2020 244 jours Produits médicaux ou d'hygiène pour lutter contre la COVID -19, y compris: - -Protection du visage et des yeux - -Gants - -Vêtements de protection - -Désinfectants - -Savon - -Autres fournitures médicales (milieu de transport viral) Arrivée à expiration Bangladesh - Élimination des droits NPF appliqués (G/MA/W/156) - Élimination d'autres taxes, y compris le droit régulateur, le droit supplémentaire, la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) et l'impôt anticipé sur le revenu (AIT) (G/MA/W/156) - Conditions spéciales pour bénéficier de ces éliminations ajoutées le 30.06.2020 (G/MA/W/159) . Par exemple, l'importateur doit être une entreprise pharmaceutique ou un fabricant de dispositifs médicaux, titulaire d'un certificat d'enregistrement pour l'importation. 22/03/2020 192 jo urs - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 - Protection du visage et des yeux - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants Liste des produits visés élargie le 30/06/2020 pour inclure: - Pièces pour la protection du visage et des yeux (par exemple, filaments, tissus, bandes d'oreilles pour masques, etc.) - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux. (G/MA/W/159) Le 30 /06/2020, les mesures ont été prorogées jusqu'au 30/09/2020 (G/MA/W/159) Arrivée à expiration G/MA/W/168 - 16 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué Canada - Exonération des droits de douane sur les produits importés par ou pour le compte d'organismes de santé publique, d'hôpitaux et de sites d'essai, et d'organisations de première intervention 16/03/2020 Non spécifiée Tous les produits importés par les entités visées, y compris: - Fournitures médicales essentielles (non définies) - Protection du visage et des yeux Maintien confirmé de la mesure le 11/05/2020 (G/MA/W/153) En vigueur (G/MA/W/145) - Exonération de la taxe de vente sur les produits importés par ou pour le compte d'organismes de santé publique, d'hôpitaux et de sites d'essai, et d'organisations de première intervention (G/MA/W/145) - Accélération de la procédure de dédouanement, dans la mesure du possible (G/MA/W/145) Vêtements de protection - Report du paiement des droits d'importation et de la taxe sur les produits et services (TPS) pour les mois de mars, d'avril et de mai au 30 juin 2020 (G/MA/W/145) 27/03/2020 95 jours Tous les produits Arrivée à expiration G/MA/W/168 - 17 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué - Exonération des droits de douane (G/MA/W/153) 05/05/2020 Non spécifiée Fournitures médicales spécifiées, y compris: - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 - Protection du visage et des yeux - Gants - Matériels de consommation médicale - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants - Savon - Papier hygiénique - Autres fournitures médicales (La liste du Canada était fondée sur la liste indicative de l'OMD/l'OMS, ainsi que sur les directives de classification de l'Agence des service s frontaliers du Canada) En vigueur Colombie - Élimination des droits de douane NPF (G/MA/W/146) 16/03/2020 et 22/03/2020 190 jours (jusqu'au 22/09/2020) - Protection du visage et des yeux - Gants - Matériels de consommation médicale - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux - Produits pharmaceutiques - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants - Savon - Autres produits (y compris produits chimiques, intrants pour l'assainissement de l'eau et certains dispositifs pour le secteur de l'aviation) Arrivée à expiration - Élimination des droits de douane NPF (G/MA/W/146/Add.1) 07/04/2020 84 jours (jusqu'au 30/06/2020) - Produits alimentaires (matières premières utilisées dans l'industrie alimentaire, y compris: le maïs dur jaune, le sorgho, le soja et les tourteaux de soja) Arrivée à expiration G/MA/W/168 - 18 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué Costa Rica - Moratoire (report) relatif à la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée pour les mois de mars, d'avril et de mai 2020; pas d'intérêt ou de sanction si celle -ci est acquittée au plus tard le 31 /12/2020 (G/MA/W/155) - Suppression des versements partiels au titre de l'impôt sur les bénéfices qui devaient être effectués en avril, en mai et en juin 2020; pas d'intérêt ou de sanction si ceux -ci sont acquittés au plus tard le 31 /12/2020 (G/MA/W/155) - Moratoire (report) su r l'impôt sélectif à la consommation pour les mois de mars, d'avril et de mai 2020; pas d'intérêt ou de sanction si celui -ci est acquitté au plus tard le 31 /12/2020 (G/MA/W/155) 20/03/2020 286 jours (jusqu'au 31/12/2020) Tous les produits Arrivée à expiration - Moratoire (report) sur les droits d'importation pour les mois d'avril, de mai et de juin 2020 pour les produits relevant des chapitres 25 à 97 du Système douanier centraméricain. Les droits devront être acquittés avant le 31/12/2020. (G/MA/W/155) 20/03/2020 286 jours (jusqu'au 31/12/2020) Tous les produits relevant des chapitres 25 à 97 du SH. Arrivée à expiration - Exonération de la TVA applicable aux locations commerciales pour la période de l'exercice budgétaire couvrant les mois d'avril, de mai et de juin 2020 (G/MA/W/155) 20/03/2020 286 jours (jusqu'au 31/12/2020) s.o. Arrivée à expiration Chili - Non-obligation de présenter certains documents pour faciliter les importations et les exportations ; et pas d'amendes pour modifications de documents douaniers (G/MA/W/148) 11/02/2020 Non spécifiée Tous les produits Non spécifiée G/MA/W/168 - 19 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué - Simplification des procédures douanières et suspension de certaines échéances (G/MA/W/148) 18/03/2020 Non spécifiée Tous les produits Complétée le 26 /03/2020 (G/MA/W/148) Modifiée le 01 /04/2020 (G/MA/W/148/Add.1) Non spécifiée - Priorité pour l'importation et le don d'intrants essentiels pour la prise en charge, le diagnostic et le traitement de la COVID -19 (G/MA/W/148) 26/03/2020 Non spécifiée Produits déclarés intrants essentiels par l'autorité sanitaire Complétée le 08 /04/2020 (G/MA/W/148) Non spécifiée - Procédures établies pour les dons lorsque l'état de catastrophe est déclaré (produits de première nécessité) (G/MA/W/148/Add.1) 13/04/2020 Non spécifiée Tous les produits Non spécifiée Corée, Rép. de - Exonération des droits de douane sur les importations (G/MA/W/147) - Approbation et dédouanement accélérés (G/MA/W/147) 20/03/2020 102 jours (jusqu'au 30/06/2020) - Protection du visage et des yeux (appareils respiratoires chirurgicaux et filtrants, et matériaux filtrants obtenus par fusion -soufflage) Arrivée à expiration Nouvelle -Zélande Élimination des droits de douane sur les importations qui se ferait initialement par le biais de "concessions tarifaires" et, une fois dans la phase de reprise, par l'élimination des droits NPF appliqués. (G/MA/W/150) 15/04/2020 Permanente Large gamme de produits, y compris: - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 - Protection du visage et des yeux - Produits alimentaires - Gants - Matériels de consommation médicale - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux - Produits pharmaceutiques - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants - Savon - Vaccins - Autres fournitures médicales - Autres produits (par exemple vitamines) En vigueur G/MA/W/168 - 20 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué République dominicaine - Élimination des droits de douane sur les importations (G/MA/W/149) - Suspension de l'impôt sur le transfert de biens industriels et de services (G/MA/W/149) 17/03/2020 Non spécifiée (pendant toute la durée de l'état d'urgence national) - Protection du visage et des yeux - Gants - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux (appareils de respiration artificielle) - Vêtements de protection Non spécifiée - Suspension de l'impôt sélectif à la consommation (G/MA/W/149) 17/03/2020 Non spécifiée (pendant toute la durée de l'état d'urgence national) - Désinfectants (alcool éthylique) Non spécifiée - Procédures accélérées de dédouanement et prolongation des horaires à l'administration des douanes (G/MA/W/149/Add.1) 16/04/2020 et 17/04/2020 Non spécifiée (pendant toute la durée de l'état d'urgence national) - Tous les produits Non spécifiée - Suspension des prélèvements, de l'impôt sur le transfert de biens industriels et de services, et d'autres droits et impositions (G/MA/W/149) 16/04/2020 Non spécifiée (pendant toute la durée de l'état d'urgence national) - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux - Désinfectants - Autres fournitures médicales (thermomètres) Non spécifiée - Autres mesures de facilitation des échanges, y compris la surtaxe pour déclaration tardive, la prorogation des dates pour le calcul de certains délais juridiques, la possibilité d'utiliser des signatures numériques, les paiements électroniques, l'enregist rement numérique des importateurs/exportateurs, l'acceptation de copies de certificats SPS, l'élimination de certains certificats, l'amélioration des priorités en matière d'analyse des risques, etc. (G/MA/W/149/Add.1) Diverses dates à compter du 20/03/2020 Non spécifiée - Tous les produits Non spécifiée G/MA/W/168 - 21 - Membre Type de mesure Prise pour la première fois le (date) Durée (jours) Produits visés Renouvelée / prorogée / modifiée Dernier statut indiqué Singapour - Élimination des droits NPF appliqués visant les produits essentiels (G/MA/W/151) - S'abstenir d'imposer des prohibitions ou restrictions à l'exportation de produits essentiels (G/MA/W/151) - Accélérer le mouvement de produits essentiels dans les ports et aéroports (G/MA/W/151) 15/04/2020 Permanente Large gamme de produits, y compris: - Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 - Protection du visage et des yeux - Produits alimentaires - Gants - Matériels de consommation médicale - Appareils et dispositifs médicaux - Produits pharmaceutiques - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants - Savon - Vaccins - Autres fournitures médicales - Autres produits (par exemple vitamines) - La plupart des produits agricoles En vigueur Suisse - Suspension des droits de douane (G/MA/W/154) 10/04/2020 182 jours (jusqu'au 09/10/2020) - Protection du visage et des yeux - Gants - Vêtements de protection - Désinfectants Arrivée à expiration G/MA/W/168 - 22 - ANNEXE 3 TYPES DE MESURES UTILISÉES DANS L'ANNEXE 1 Symbole Types de mesures CP-X Prohibition ou interdiction conditionnelle à l'exportation GQ-X Contingent global NAL-X Procédure de licences d'exportation non automatiques P-X Prohibition ou interdiction à l'exportation G/MA/W/168 - 23 - ANNEXE 4 DÉFINITION DES CATÉGORIES DE PRODUITS1 Catégorie de produits Codes du SH 2017 Désignation des produits Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 3822.00 Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 3002.15 Trousses d'essai de la COVID -19 9027.80 Instruments et appareils pour tests de diagnostic de la COVID -19 3821.00 Assortiment constitué par un écouvillon et un milieu de transport viral Protection du visage et des yeux 4818.90 Masques en papier/cellulose 6307.90 Masque de protection en matière textile sans organe filtrant remplaçable ni parties mécaniques, y compris les masques chirurgicaux et les masques de protection jetables en textiles non tissés . Ceci comprend les masques dénommés masques respiratoires filtrants N95. 9020.00 Masques à gaz avec parties mécaniques ou organes filtrants remplaçables destinés à la protection contre des agents biologiques . Comprend également ces mêmes masques intégrant une protection oculaire ou des écrans faciaux. 9004.90 Lunettes protectrices 3926.90 Écrans faciaux en matières plastiques (couvrant davantage que la zone oculaire) Produits alimentaires Divers Toutes les substances qui sont utilisées comme aliments ou pour fabriquer des aliments. Gants 3926.20 Gants en matières plastiques 4015.11 Gants chirurgicaux en caoutchouc 4015.19 Autres gants en caoutchouc. 6116.10 Gants en bonneterie, imprégnés ou recouverts de matières plastiques ou de caoutchouc 6216.00 Gants en matières textiles, autres que ceux en bonneterie Appareils et dispositifs médicaux 9019.20 Respirateurs artificiels (appareils de respiration artificielle), appareils d 'oxygénation par membrane extra -corporelle (ECMO), appareils de ventilation à pression positive continue (CPAP), appareils de ventilation à pression positive à deux niveaux (BiPap ou BPap), concentrateurs d 'oxygène, humidificateurs d 'oxygène pou r oxygénothérapie, dispositifs d'alimentation en oxygène destinés à fournir de l 'oxygène de l 'appareil au patient 9026.80 Débitmètre d 'oxygène 0 -15 L/min à tube de Thorpe 9019.20 Répartiteurs de débit 9018.19 Oxymètres de pouls 9022.12 Scanners de tomographie pilotés par une machine automatique de traitement de l 'information 9018.12 Appareils à ultrasons 9018.11 Électrocardiographes 9018.19 Dispositifs de surveillance des patients à paramètres multiples 9018.19 ou 9018.90 Laryngoscopes 9027.80 Détecteur colorimétrique de CO2 en fin d 'expiration 9025.19 Thermomètres à infrarouge/thermomètres numériques 9018.90 Stéthoscopes 9018.90 Pinces Magill 1 Chaque fois que cela est possible, les catégo ries de produits sont fondées sur le classement de référence dans le SH des fournitures médicales liées à la COVID -19 établi par l'OMD/l'OMS, édition 3.01, disponible à l'adresse suivante: hs-classification -reference_edition -3_fr.pdf (wcoomd.org) . G/MA/W/168 - 24 - Catégorie de produits Codes du SH 2017 Désignation des produits 9018.90 Kits d 'intubation 8413.19 ou 9018.90 Pompe à perfusion, avec ou sans accessoires 9028.20 Compte -gouttes électronique, pour solutions intraveineuses 9018.90 Pompes d 'aspiration médicales 9018.90 Perceuses médicales pour accès vasculaire 7324.90 Bassins réniformes Produits pharmaceutiques Divers des chapitres 28, 29 et 30 Tous les médicaments, produits pharmaceutiques et ingrédients qui ont été spécifiquement mentionnés comme étant en relation avec la pandémie de COVID -19. Vêtements de protection 3926.20 Vêtements de protection unisexe constitués par des feuilles de matières plastiques, des matières plastiques renforcées à l'aide de textiles ou des matières plastiques combinées à du textile servant de support. 4015.90 Vêtements de protection unisexe constitués par des feuilles de caoutchouc, du caoutchouc renforcé à l 'aide de textiles ou du caoutchouc combiné à du textile servant de support. 4818.50 Vêtements et accessoires du vêtement en papier ou en cellulose, tels que les blouses d 'hôpital jetabl es en papier, les couvre -chaussures en papier, etc. C es produits sont couverts pour autant qu'ils soient en papier, en pâte à papier, en ouate de cellulose ou en nappes de fibres de cellulose. Veuillez vérifier auprès de l 'administration des douanes du pay s d'importation s 'il ne s 'agit pas simplement de papier ou de cellulose, car ils pourraient être classés ailleurs. 6210.10 Vêtements de protection à usage médical/chirurgical en feutres ou non tissés, qu 'ils soient ou non imprégnés, enduits, recouverts ou stratifiés (tissus des n° 56.02 ou 56.03) . Sont également compris les vêtements non tissés. 6210.40 Vêtements de protection pour hommes à usage médical/chirurgical, en tissus imprégnés, enduits ou recouverts de matière plastique ou stratifiés avec de la matière plastique. 6210.40 Vêtements de protection pour hommes, en tissus caoutchoutés. 6210.50 Vêtements de protection pour femmes o u unisexe à usage médical/chirurgical, en tissus imprégnés, enduits ou recouverts de matière plastique ou stratifiés avec de la matière plastique. 6210.50 Vêtements de protection pour femmes ou unisexe, en tissus caoutchoutés. 3926.20 "Tabliers de protection" - en matières plastiques, jetables 3926.90 4016.99 Couvre -chaussures/surchaussures - en matières plastiques ou en caoutchouc, jetables 4818.90 Couvre -chaussures/surchaussures - en cellulose/papier, jetables 6307.90 Couvre -chaussures/surchaussures - en textiles non tissés, jetables Désinfectants 2207.10 Solution d 'alcool 2208.90 Solution d 'alcool 3808.94 Désinfectant pour les mains 3808.94 Autres préparations désinfectantes 8419.20 Stérilisateurs médicaux, chirurgicaux ou de laboratoire, y compris les autoclaves 2847.00 Peroxyde d 'hydrogène en vrac 3004.90 Peroxyde d 'hydrogène présenté en tant que médicament 3808.94 Peroxyde d 'hydrogène présenté sous forme de préparations désinfectantes pour le nettoyage des surfaces 3808.94 Autres désinfectants chimiques 2905.12 Propane -1-ol (alcool propylique) et propane -2-ol (alcool isopropylique) 2915.11 2915.12 Acide formique et ses sels G/MA/W/168 - 25 - Catégorie de produits Codes du SH 2017 Désignation des produits 2918.21 Acide salicylique et ses sels 8539.49 Lampes à rayons ultraviolets 8539.50 Lampes à LED à rayons ultraviolets 8543.70 Appareils d 'irradiation à ultraviolets, pour la désinfection Savon 3401.20 Savon 3401.11 Savon 3401.30 Produits destinés au lavage des mains ou de la peau, sous forme de liquide ou de crème, conditionnés pour la vente au détail Papier hygiénique 4803.00 Papier hygiénique 4818.10 Papier hygiénique Vaccins 3002.20 Vaccins pour la médecine humaine 3002.30 Vaccins pour la médecine vétérinaire Autres fournitures médicales Divers Autres fournitures médicales, telles que les matériels de consommation médicale, qui ne font partie d'aucune des catégories de produits mentionnées ci -dessus. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN10_BRA377A2.pdf

s_G_TBTN10_BRA377A2

G/TBT/N/BRA/377/Add.2 8 de julio de 2021 (21-5380) Página: 1/1 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 7 de julio de 2021 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación del Brasil . _______________ Título : Technical regulation for festive articles - Consolidated (Reglamento Técnico relativo a los Artículos para Fiestas . Consolidado) Motivo del addendum : [ ] Modificación del plazo para presentar observaciones - fecha: [ ] Adopción de la medida notificada - fecha: [X] Publicación de la medida notificada - fecha : 5 de julio de 2021 [X] Entrada en vigor de la medida notificada - fecha : 2 de agosto de 2021 [X] Indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva1: http://www.inmetro.gov.br/legislacao/rtac/pdf/RTAC002789.pdf https://in.gov.br/web/dou/ -/portaria -n-277-de-25-de-junho -de-2021-329793894 [ ] Retiro o derogación de la medida notificada - fecha: Signatura pertinente, en el caso de que se vuelva a notificar la medida: [ ] Modificación del contenido o del ámbito de aplicación de la medida notificada e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: Nuevo plazo para presentar observaciones (si procede): [ ] Publicación de documentos interpretativos e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: [ ] Otro motivo: Descripción : El Instituto Nacional de Metrología, Calidad y Tecnología (INMETRO) publicó la Orden Nº 277, de 25 de junio de 2021 , por la que se consolida el Reglamento Técnico relativo a los Artículos para Fiestas. La consolidación del Reglamento tiene por objeto poner en aplicación el Decreto Nº 10.139, de 28 de noviembre de 2020 . En la fecha de entrada en vigor de la Orden Nº 277 del INMETRO quedan revocadas: - la Orden Nº 414 del INMETRO, de 29 de octubre de 2010 , publicada en el Diario Oficial del Brasil de 1 de novi embre de 2010 , sección 1, página 71. __________ 1 Entre otras cosas, puede aportarse la dirección de un sitio web, un anexo en pdf u otra información que indique dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva/modificada y/o documentos interpretativos.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NTZA88.pdf

s_G_SPS_NTZA88

G/SPS/N/TZA/88 8 de diciembre de 2020 (20-8825) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN 1. Miembro que notifica : TANZANÍA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable : Tanzan ia Bureau of Standards (Oficina de Normas de Tanzanía) 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC ; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS) : mantequilla de nuez de marañón (merey, cajuil, anacardo o "cajú") (especificaciones). 4. Regiones o países que podrían verse afectados, en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [X] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [ ] Regiones o países específicos: 5. Título del documento notificado : Norma del Comité de Normalización de la Dirección de Agricultura y Alimentación AFDC 4 (292) CD3, Cashew butter - Specification (Mantequilla de nuez de marañón (merey, cajuil, anacardo o "cajú") . Especificaciones) . Idioma(s) : inglés . Número de páginas : 5. 6. Descripción del contenido : En la Norma de Tanzanía notificada se especifican los requisitos y los métodos de muestreo y de prueba aplicables a la mantequilla de nuez de marañón (merey, cajuil, anacardo o "cajú") obtenida de los granos del árbol del mara ñón (Anacardium occidentale , L.) y destinada al consumo humano. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser : [X] inocuidad de los alimentos, [ ] sanidad animal, [ ] preservación de los vegetales, [ ] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [ ] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. G/SPS/N/TZA/88 - 2 - 8. ¿Existe una norma internacional pertinente ? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [ ] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejemplo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animales Acuáticos) : [ ] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : [X] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? [ ] Sí [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible, en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional: 9. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s) en que están disponibles: 10. Fecha propuesta de adopción (día/mes/año) : enero de 2021 Fecha propuesta de publicación (día/mes/año) : fecha de adopción como norma obligatoria por el Ministerio de Industria, Comercio e Inversión 11. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor : [X] Seis meses a partir de la fecha de publicación, y/o (día/mes/año) : [X] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones : [X] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación y/o (día/mes/año ): 6 de febrero de 2021 Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otr a institución: Correo electrónico : nep@tbs.go.tz 13. Texto(s) disponible(s) en : [ ] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [X] Servicio nacional de información . Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico (en su caso) de otra institución: Correo electrónico : nep@tbs.go.tz

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_AG_NNIC73.pdf

q_G_AG_NNIC73

G/AG/N/NIC/ 73 7 March 2024 (24-2123) Page: 1/2 Committee on Agriculture Original: Spanish NOTIFICATION The following submission, dated 5 March 2024, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Nicaragua . The notification concerns imports under tariff quotas ( Table MA:2 ) during the calendar year 20 23. _______________ G/AG/N/NIC/ 73 - 2 - Table MA:2 MARKET ACCESS: NICARAGUA REPORTING PERIOD : CALENDAR YEAR FROM 01 -01-2023 TO 31 -12-2023 Lists relating to tariff and other quota commitments TQ ID Description of products Tariff item number(s) encompassed in product description Not opened Reporting year Unit Tariff quota quantity for period In-quota imports during period Fill rate ((4/3)*100) Note (derived from Section I -B (or I-A) of Part I of the Schedule) (from Section I -B (or I -A) of Part I of the Schedule) Type From To 1 2 3 4 5 NICQ001 Maize (corn) 10059020 and 10059030  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Thousands of quintals 193.2 (1) NICQ002 Bovine meat 0201 and 0202  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Millions of pounds 3.48 (1) NICQ003 Chicken 02071000 and 02073100  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Millions of pounds 1.88 (1) NICQ004 Milk 0401, 0402 and 0403  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Millions of litres 13.41 6.92 51.6% NICQ005 Beans 07133  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Thousands of quintals 53.1 (1) NICQ006 Rice 10061090 and 10063000  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Thousands of quintals 109.6 1 98.13 89.5% NICQ007 Sorghum 10070090  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Thousands of quintals 138 (1) NICQ008 Oil 1507, 1511 and 15122  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Millions of litres 1.89 (1) NICQ009 Sugar 1701  Calendar 01-01-23 31-12-23 Short tons 48.3 (1) (1) All imports of the above products are subject to the tariff in effect, which is below the levels bound in Part I, Section I -B of Nicaragua's Schedule XXIX ; the quotas do not therefore apply. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_Jobs_TBT_369.pdf

q_Jobs_TBT_369

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/288837_2022_SPS_RWA_22_6968_00_e.pdf

288837_2022_SPS_RWA_22_6968_00_e

DEAS 13: 2022 ICS 13.060.20 © EAC 2022 Fourth Edition 2022 DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD Packaged mineral water — Specification EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY DEAS 13: 2022 ii © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved Copyright notice This EAC document is copyright -protected by EAC. While the reproduction of this document by participants in the EAC standards development process is permitted without prior permission from EAC, neither this document nor any extract from it may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form for any other purpose without prior written permission from EAC. Requests for permission to reproduce this docu ment for the purpose of selling it should be addressed as shown below or to EAC’s member body in the country of the requester: © East African Community 2022 — All rights reserved East African Community P.O. Box 1096 , Arusha Tanzania Tel: + 255 27 2 162100 Fax: + 255 27 2162190 E-mail: eac@eachq.org Web: www.eac -quality.net Reproduction for sales purposes may be subject to royalty payments or a licensing agreement. Violators may be prosecuted . DEAS 13: 2022 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved iii Contents Page Foreword ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... ivvi 1 Scope ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 1 2 Conformance ................................ ................................ ........................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1 3 Normative references ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 12 4 Terms and definitions ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 3 5 Symbols (and abbreviated terms) ................................ .......................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3 6 Clause ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 54 6.1 Subclause (level 1) ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 54 6.1.1 Subclause (level 2) ................................ ................................ .................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4 6.1.2 Subclause (level 2) ................................ ................................ .................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 5 6.2 Subclause (level 1) ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 65 7 Clause ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 65 8 Special ................................ ................................ ................................ ....Error! Bookmark not defined. 10 Annex A (normative) Annex title ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 1211 A.1 General ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 1211 A.2 Clause ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 1211 A.2.1 Subclause (level 1) ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 1211 A.2.2 Subclause (level 1) ................................ ................................ ................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 12 A.3 Clause ................................ ................................ ................................ .....Error! Bookmark not defined. 12 Annex B (informative) Which styles correspond to which element — Quick reference guide ........... 2313 Bibliography ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 2716 DEAS 13: 2022 iv © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved Foreword Development of the East African Standards has been necessitated by the need for harmonizing requirements governing quality of products and services in the East African Community. It is envisaged that through harmonized standardization, trade barriers that are encountered when goods and services are exchanged within the Community will be removed. The Community has established an East African Standards C ommittee (EASC) mandated to develop and issue East African Standards (EAS) . The Committee is composed of representatives of the National Standards Bodies in Partner States, together with the representatives from the public and private sector organizations in the community . East African Standards are developed through Technical Committees that are representative of key stakeholders including government, academia, consumer groups, private sector and other interested parties. Draft East African Standards are circulated to stakeholders through the National Standards Bodies in the Partner States. The comments received are discussed and incorporated before finalization of standards, in accordance with the Principles and procedures for development of East African Standards. East African Standards are subject to review, to keep pace with technological advances. Users of the East African Standards are therefore expected to ensure that they always have the latest versions of the standards they are implementing . The committee responsible for this document is Technical Committee EASC /TC 081, Drinking water . Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be subject of patent rights. EAC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. This fourth edition cancels and replaces the third edition ( EAS 13:2018 ), which has been technically rev ised. DEAS 13: 2022 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved v EAST AFRICAN STANDARD DEAS 13:2022 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 1 Packaged mineral water — Specification 1 Scope This Draft East African S tandard specifies requirements , samplin g and test methods for packaged mineral water for human consumption This Standard applies to natural mineral water, mineral water, natural spring water, spring water and carbonated mineral water . 2 Normative references The following documents are referre d to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendment s) applies. ASTM D 3871 -84, Standard test methods for purgeable organic compounds in water using headspace sampling ASTM D 5907 -13, Standard test methods for filterable matter (total dissolved solids) and non -filterable matter (total suspended solids) in w ater EAS 38, Labelling of prepackaged foods — Specification ISO 6888 -1, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the enumeration of coagulase -positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species) — Part 1: Technique using Baird -Parker agar medium ISO 10304 -1, Water quality — Determination of dissolved anions by liquid chromatography of ions — Determination of bromide, chloride, fluoride, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate and sulphate ISO 10359, Water quality — Determinati on of fluoride ISO 10523, Water quality — Determination of pH ISO 10530, Water quality — Determination of dissolved sulfide — Photometric method using methylene blue ISO 10566, Water quality — Determination of aluminium — Spectrometric method using pyroca techol violet ISO 11423, Water quality — Determination of benzene and some derivatives ISO 11732, Water quality -- Determination of ammonium nitrogen — Method by flow analysis (CFA and FIA) and spectrometric detection ISO 11885, Water quality — Determinati on of selected elements by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP -OES) ISO 11969, Water quality — Determination of arsenic — Atomic absorption spectrometric method (hydride technique) 2 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved ISO 12020, Water quality — Determination of alumi nium — Atomic absorption spectrometric method ISO 12846, Water quality — Determination of mercury — Method using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) with and without enrichment ISO 15089, Water quality — Guidelines for selective immunoassays for the deter mination of plant treatment and pesticide agents ISO 16265, Water quality — Determination of the methylene blue active substances (MBAS) index — Method using continuous flow analysis (CFA) ISO 16266, Water quality -- Detection and enumeration of Pseudomona s aeruginosa ━ Method by membrane filtration ISO 21567, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the detection of Shigella spp ISO 24153, Random sampling and randomization procedures ISO 28540 , Water quality — Determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in water -- Method using gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC -MS) ISO 28540, Water quality — Determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in water — Method using gas chromatography with mass sp ectrometric detection (GC -MS) ISO 5961, Water quality — Determination of cadmium by atomic absorption spectrometry ISO 6059, Water quality -- Determination of the sum of calcium and magnesium -— EDTA titrimetric method ISO 6222, Water quality ― Enumeration of culturable microorganisms ━ Colony count by inoculation in nutrient agar culture media ISO 6332, Water quality — Determination of iron — Spectrometric method using 1,10 -phenanthroline ISO 6333, Water quality -- Determination of manganese — Formaldoxime spectrometric method ISO 6461 -1, Water quality ― Detection and enumeration of the spores of sulphite reducing anaerobes (clostridia) — Part 1: Method by enrichment in a liquid medium ISO 6461 -2, Water quality ― Detection ad enumeration of th e spores of sulphite -reducing anaerobes (clostridia) — Part 2: Method by membrane filtration ISO 6703, Water quality — Determination of cyanide ISO 6777, Water quality -- Determination of nitrite — Molecular absorption spectrometric method ISO 6 340, Water quality ━ Detection and enumeration of Salmonella ISO 7027, Water quality — Determination of turbidity ISO 7393, Water quality — Determination of free chlorine and total chlorine ISO 7875, Water quality — Determination of surfactants ISO 7887, Water quality — Determination of colour ISO 7888, Water quality — Determination of electrical conductivity © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 3 ISO 7890, Water quality -- Determination of nitrate — Part 3: Spectrometric method using sulfosalicylic acid ISO 7899 -2, Water quality ― Detection and enumeration of i ntestinal enterococci — Part 2: Membrane filtration method ISO 7980, Water quality — Determination of calcium and magnesium — Atomic absorption spectrometric method ISO 8165, Water quality -- Determination of selected monovalent phenols ISO 8245, Water qu ality -- Guidelines for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) ISO 8288, Water quality — Determination of cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, cadmium and lead — Flame atomic absorption spectrometric methods ISO 9174, Water quality -- Determination of chromium -- Atomic absorption spectrometric methods ISO 9297, Water quality -- Determination of chloride — Silver nitrate titration with chromate indicator (Mohr’s method) ISO 9308 -1, Water quality — Detection and enumerati on of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria — Part 1: Membrane filtration method for waters with low bacterial background flora ISO 9308 -2, Water quality — Detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria — Part 2: Most probable number method ISO 9696, Water quality — Measurement of gross alpha activity in non -saline water — Thick source method ISO 9697, Water quality — Measurement of gross beta activity in non -saline water — Thick source method ISO 9964 (all parts) , Water quality — Dete rmination of sodium and potassium ISO 9965, Water quality — Determination of selenium — Atomic absorption spectrometric method (hydride technique ) ISO 10301, Water quality — Determination of highly volatile halogenated hydrocarbons — Gas chromatographic m ethods ISO 11731, Water quality – Enumeration of Legionella ISO 15553 Water quality — Isolation and identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts from water ISO 18073, Water quality — Determination of tetra - to octa -chlorinated dioxins and fu rans — Method using isotope dilution HRGC/HRMS 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses: — ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp 4 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 3.1 natural mineral water water clearly distinguishable from ordinary drinking water because: a) it is characterized by its content of certain mineral sa lts and their relative proportions and the presence of trace elements or of other constituents; b) it is obtained directly from natural or drilled sources from underground water bearing strata for which all possible precautions should be taken within the protected perimeters to avoid any pollution of, or external influence on, the chemical and physical qualities of natural mineral water; c) of the constancy of its composition and the stability of its discharge and its temperature, due account being taken of the cycles of minor natural fluctuations; d) it is collected under conditions which guarantee the original microbiological purity and chemical composition of essential components; e) it is packaged close to the point of emergence of the source with p articular hygienic precautions; f) it is not subjected to any treatment other than those permitted by this standard . 3.2 mineral water water as defined in 3.1 that may include permitted treatment such as ozonation, UV sterilization, decantation filtration and permitted selective removal of fluoride 3.3 spring water water derived from an underground formation from which water flows naturally to the surface of the earth through a natural orifice 3.4 packaged natural mineral water water from a natural source that has been filled and, sealed into containers at the source or close to the source, and intended for human consumption 3.5 mineral waters Refers to natural mineral water, mineral water, spring water, natural carbonated mineral water, artificial carbona ted mineral water, 3.6 naturally carbonated natural mineral water /naturally carbonated mineral water natural mineral water which, after possible treatment in accordance with Section 5.1 and re -incorporation of gas from the same source and after packaging taking into consideration usual technical tolerance, has the same content of carbon dioxide spontaneously and visibly given off under normal conditions of temperature and pressure. 3.7 non-carbonated natural mineral water /non -carbonated mineral water natural mineral water which, by nature and after possible treatment in accordance with 5.1 and after packaging taking into consideration usual technical tolerance, does not contain free carbon dioxide in excess of the amount necessary to keep the hydrogen ca rbonate salts present in the water dissolved. 3.8 decarbonated natural mineral water /decarbonated mineral water natural mineral water which, after possible treatment in accordance with 5.1 and after packaging, has less carbon dioxide content than that at emergence and does not visibly and spontaneously give off carbon dioxide under normal conditions of temperature and pressure. © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 5 3.9 natural mineral water fortified with carbon dioxide from the source /mineral water fortified with carbon dioxide from the sou rce natural mineral water which, after possible treatment in accordance with 5.1 and after packaging, has more carbon dioxide content than that at emergence. 3.10 carbonated natural mineral water /carbonated mineral water natural mineral water which, afte r possible treatment in accordance with 5.1 and after packaging, has been made effervescent by the addition of carbon dioxide from another origin. 3.11 contamination occurrence of any objectionable matter in the product 3.12 establishment any building(s) or areas in which natural mineral water is handled and collected, together with the surroundings under the control of the same management 3.13 handling of natural mineral water any manipulation with regard to collecting, treating, bottling, packaging, sto ring, transporting, distributing and selling natural mineral water 3.14 food hygiene all measures necessary to ensure the safety, soundness and wholesomeness of natural mineral water at all stages from its exploitation and process ing until its final consu mption 3.15 packaging material any containers such as cans, bottles, cartons, boxes, cases or wrapping and covering material such as foil, film, metal paper and wax paper. 3.16 pests any animals capable of, directly or indirectly, cont aminating natural mi neral waters 3.17 aquifers any solid permeable mass of rocks (layer) c ontaining natural mineral water 3.18 contaminant any substance not intentionally added to mineral waters, which is present in such mineral waters as a result of the production, processi ng, preparation, treatment, packing, packaging, transport or holding of such mineral waters, or as a result of environmental contamination. 4 Treatment and handling 4.1 General 4.1.1 Treatments permitted include separation from unstable constituents, such as compounds containing iron, manganese, sulphur or arsenic, by decantation, filtration and permitted selective removal of fluoride, if necessary, accelerated by previous aeration. 6 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 4.1.2 The treatments provided for in 3.6, 3.7,3.8, 3.9, 3.10 and 4.1.1 may only be carried out on condition that the mineral content of the water is not modified in its essential constituents, which give the water its properties. 4.1.3 Transportation of natural mineral waters in bulk containers for packaging or for any other p rocess before packaging is prohibited. 4.2 Permitted treatment Permitted treatment of mineral water include ozonation, UV sterilization, decantation , filtration and permitted selective removal of fluoride. These treatments may only be carried out on condit ion that the mineral content of the water is not modified in its essential constituents, which give the water its properties. If ozonation treatment is applied, it shall be declared on the label. 5 Requirements 5.1 General requirements 5.1.1 Physical requi rements Packaged mineral water s shall not : a) have objectionable taste or odour to the consumers and shall be free from any foreign matter; and b) having any sediment or suspended matter during its shelf life. 5.1.2 Authorization 5.1.2.1 The source of mineral wa ters shall be authorized by relevant national authority from which the mineral emerge. 5.1.2.2 The distance from the source to the establishment shall be determined by the relevant National authority. 5.1.2.3 The water safety plan shall be established and implemented in accordance with Annex C. 5.2 Specific requirements Packaged mineral water s shall comply with the physico -chemical requirements as given in Table 1 when tested in accordance with the method prescribed therein . Table 1 – Physico -chemical requi rements for packaged mineral water Sl. No. Substance Limit Test methods i. Colour, TCU, max. 15 ISO 7887 ii. Turbidity, NTU, m ax. 1 ISO 7027 iii. pHa b 5.5 - 8.5 ISO 10523 iv. Aluminium as Al3+, mg/l, max. 0.2 ISO 10566 v. Calcium as Ca2+, mg/l, max. 250 ISO 5961 vi. Chloride as Cl-, mg/l, max. 250 ISO 9297 vii. Fluoride as F-, mg/l, max. 4(c,d) ISO 10359 viii. Iron as Fe2+, mg/l, max. 0.3 ISO 6332 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 7 ix. Magnesium as Mg2+, mg/l, max. 100 ISO 7980 x. Nitrate as NO 3- , mg/l, max. 50 ISO 7890 xi. Potassium as K+, mg/l, max. 50 ISO 9 964 xii. Sodium as Na+, mg/l, max. 200 ISO 9964 xiii. Sulphate as SO 42- , mg/l, max. 400e ISO 10304 xiv. Sulphide as H 2S, mg/l, max. 0.05 ISO 10530 xv. Total dissolved solids , mg/l, max. 1000 ASTM D 5907 -13 xvi. Total Suspended solids Not detactable ASTM D 5907 -13 a For artificial carbonated mineral water, the pH range shall be 4 - 5.9 b For natural carbonated mineral water, the pH range shall be 5.5 – 6.5. c Packaged mineral water s containing between 1.5 mg/l and 4 mg/l fluoride shall have a label ling declaration mineral water s contains Fluoride included . d If the product contains more than 1.5 mg/l ‘’the product is not suitable for infants and children under the age of seven years’’ shall be declared on the label. e Packaged mineral water s containing between 200 mg/l and 400 mg/l sulphate shall have a labelling declaration mineral water s contains Sulphate' included. 6 Contaminants 6.1 Inorganic contaminants Packaged mineral water s shall not contain inorganic contaminants in excess of limits indicated given in Table 2 when tested in accordance with the methods prescribed therein . Table 2 – Limits for inorganic contaminants in packaged mineral water SL. No. Substance Limit, mg/L, max. Methods of test (i) Ammonia (NH 3), 0.5 ISO 11732 (ii) Arsenic (As), 0.01 ISO 119 69 (iii) Barium (Ba), 0.7 ISO 11885 (iv) Borate (B), 5 ISO11885 (v) Cadmium (Cd), 0.003 ISO 5961 (vi) Total c hromium (Cr), 0.005 ISO 9174 (vii) Copper (Cu), 1 ISO 8288 (viii) Cyanide (CN-), 0.07 ISO6703 (ix) Free Chlorine (Cl2), Nil ISO 7393 (x) Iodine as (I-), 1.0 ASTM D 3869 -15 (xi) Lead (Pb), 0.01 ISO 8288 (xii) Manganese (Mn), 0.4 ISO 6333 (xiii) Mercury (Hg), 0.001 ISO 12846 (xiv) Nitrite (NO 2-), 0.1 ISO 6777 (xv) Selenium (Se), 0.01 ISO 9965 8 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved (xvi) Silver (Ag), 0.5 ASTM D 386 6-12 (xvii) Zinc (Zn), 5 ISO 8288 (xviii) Antimony (Sb), 0.005 ISO 11885 (xix) Nickel (Ni), 0.02 ISO 8288 (xx) Bromate (BrO 3-) a) 0.01 ISO 15061 (xxi) Uranium 0.03 ASTM D 6239 -9 a) In case of ozonation, bromate shall be tested and confirmed to be within the limits. 6.2 Organic contaminants Packaged mineral water s shall comply with the requirements for organic contaminants given in Table 3 when tested in accordance with the methods prescribed therein . Table 3 – Requirements for limits of organi c contaminants in packaged mineral water Sl. No Substance Limit Methods of test (i) Benzene, mg/l , max. 0.005 ISO 11423 (ii) Chlorinated hydrocarbons, mg/l , max. 0.005 ISO 10301 (iii) Dioxin Absent ISO 18073 (v) Organic matter (as O 2), mg/l, max. 3 ISO 8245 (vi) Pesticides and PCBs Absent ISO 15089 (vii) Phenols Absent ISO 8165 (viii) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , µg/l, max. 0.2 ISO 28540 (ix) Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons Absent ISO 28540 (x) Surfactants (reacting with methylene blue), mg/l, max. 0.2 ISO 16265 (xi) Total trihalomethanes, mg/l , max. 0.1 ASTM D 3871 -84 (xii) Anionic surfactant (reacting with methylene blue) Absent ISO 7875 6.3 Radioactive characteristics Packaged mineral water s shall comply with the requirements of rad ioactive mat erials given in Table 4 when tested in accordance with the test methods specified therein. Table 4 – Requirements of radioactive matter in packaged mineral water s Sl. No. Radioactive material Maximum limits , Bq/L Method of test i) Gross alpha activity 0.5 ISO 9696 ii) Gross beta activity 1 ISO 9697 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 9 6.4 Microbiological contaminants Packaged mineral water s shall comply with the microbiological limits given in Table 5 when tested in accordance with the test methods specified therein . Table 5 – Microbiological requirements for packaged mineral water Sl. No. Type of micro -organism Limits Method of test i) Total viable counts at 22 ºC in mL, max. a) 100 ISO 6222 Total viable counts at 37 ºC, in mL, max. a) 50 ii) Total Coliforms , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 9308 -1 ISO 9308 -2 iii) E. Coli , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 9308 -1 ISO 9308 -2 iv) Staphylococcus aureus , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 6888 -1 v) Sulphite reducing anaerobes , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 6461 -2 vi) Pseudomonas ae ruginos a fluorescence , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 16266 vii) Entero coccus faecalis , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 7899 -2 viii) Shigella , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 21567 ix) Salmonella , CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 19250 x) Cryptosporidium , CFU/ 100 ml Not detectable ISO 15553 xi) Giardia , CFU/100 ml Not detectable xii) Legionella spp., CFU/100 ml Not detectable ISO 11731 a) This parameter is for monitoring the system at source /processing facility . Determination of total viable counts shall s tart within 6 h of collection. If this is not practical, the sample shall be preserved at 4 ºC for not more than 6 h and analysed within 12 h from the time of collection. 7 Hygiene 7.1 Packaged mineral waters shall be collected, processes, packaged and m arketed under hygienic conditions in Annex A. 7.2 The source of packaged mineral waters shall be protected from risks of pollution. 8 Packaging 8.1 The packaged mineral water shall be pack aged in s ealed retail containers suitable for preventing the possibl e adulteration or contamination of water and shall be in accordance with environmental regulations of Partner States . 8.2 The package shall be made from food grade material and strong enough to withstand normal handling and transportation 10 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 8.3 Packaged mineral water should not be packaged in opaque containers . 9 Weights and measures The volume and fill of the product shall comply with the weights and measures regulations of Partner States or equivalent legislation. 10 Labelling 10.1 General In addition to the requirements of EAS 38, the following specific labelling requirements shall apply and shall be legibly and indelibly marked . a) name of the product as provided in clause 3; b) composition of the product with at least the following: Na+, K+ Ca++, Mg++, Fe++, Cl-, SO 42-, F-, NO 3; c) pH and TDS ; and d) net content in metric units. 10.2 Additional lebelling requirements If packaged natural mineral water has been sub jected to a ozonation treatment, the treatment shall be declared on the label. 10.3 Labelling prohibition s 10.3.1 No claims concerning medicinal (preventive, alleviative or curative) or other beneficial effects relating to the health of the consumer shall be made in respect of the properties of the product covered by the standard. 10.3.2 The name of the local ity, hamlet or specified place may not form part of the trade name unless it refers to a mineral water s collected at the place designated by that trade name. 10.3.3 The use of any statement or of any pictorial device, which may create confusion in the mind of the public or in any way mislead the public about the nature, origin, composition and properties of mineral water s put on sale, is prohibited. 11 Parameters required for minimum monitoring 11.1 It is is recognized that, in many instances, the cost of performing a full analysis against Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5, can be prohibitive. 11.2 Analysis of the parameters in Table 6 may be deemed acceptable for the purpose of indicating on going levels of operational efficiency in a water treatment plant. However, a relevant authority may require additional tests. Table 6 – Parameters required for minimum monitoring Sl. No. Property Test method © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 11 a) Taste Organoleptic test b) Odour c) Turbidity; Table 1 d) Colour e) pH value f) Fluoride as F- g) Nitrate h) Aluminium i) Iron(total) j) Total dissolved solids/Conductivity Table 1/ISO 7888 k) Nitrite Table 2 l) Ammonia m) Residual chlorine n) Faecal coliform bacteria or E. coli Table 5 o) Total viable count 11.3 If abnormal results are encount ered in any of these analyses, sampling frequency shall be increased and/or additional analyses carried out. 11.4 A consumer complaints register for the aesthetic qualities of the water sh all be maintained. 12 Sampling plan for packaged mineral water Samp ling plan shall be done in accordance with Annex B. 12 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved Annex A (normative) Recommended hygienic practices A.1 Field of application This annex prescribes appropriate general techniques for collecting mineral water s, its treatment, bottling, packaging, storag e, transport, distribution and sale for direct consumption, so as to guarantee a safe, healthy and wholesome product. A.2 Prescriptions of the resources of mineral water A.2.1 Protection of alimentary reservoirs and aquifers A.2.1.1 Authorization Mineral w ater shall be recognized and approved as such by the relevant Authority having jurisdiction in the place of collection. A.2.1.2 Determination of the genesis of mineral water s As far as it is methodologically possible in each case, a precise analysis should be carried out on the origin of mineral waters, the period of their residence in the ground before being collected and their chemical and physical qualities. A.2.1.3 Perimeter of protection If possible areas wherein mineral water s might be polluted or its chemical and physical qualities otherwise deteriorated should be determined by a relevant authority. Where indicated by hydrogeological conditions and considering the risks of pollution and physical, chemical and biochemical reactions, several perimeters with separate dimensions may be provided. A.2.1.4 Protective measures All possible precautions should be taken within the protected perimeters to avoid any pollution, of or external influence on, the chemical and physical qualities of mineral water s It is recommended that regulations be established for the disposal of liquid, solid or gaseous waste, the use of substances that might deteriorate mineral water s (e.g. by agriculture) as well as for any possibility of accidental deterioration of mineral water s by natural occurrences such as a change in t he hydrogeological conditions. Particular consideration should be given to the following potential pollutants: bacteria, viruses, fertilizers, hydrocarbons, detergents, pesticides, phenolic compounds, toxic metals , radioactive substances and other soluble organic or inorganic substances. Even where nature provides apparently sufficient protection against surface pollution, potential hazards should be taken into consideration, such as mining, hydraulic and engineeri ng facilities etc. © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 13 A.2.2 Hygiene prescriptions for collection of mineral water s A.2.2.1 Extraction The withdrawal of mineral water s (from springs, galleries, genuine or drilled wells) shall be performed in conformity with the hydrogeological conditions in such a manner as to prevent any other than the mineral water s from entering or, should there be pumping facilities, prevent any extraneous water from entering by reducing the supply. The mineral water s thus collected or pumped should be protected in such a way that it will be safe from pollution whether caused by natural occurrence or actions or neglect or ill will. A.2.2.2 Materials The pipes, pumps or other possible devices coming into contact with mineral water s and used for its collection should be made of such material as to guarantee that are original qualities of mineral water s will not be changed. A.2.2.3 Protection of the extraction area In the immediate surroundings of springs and wells, precautionary measures should be taken to guarantee that no p ollutant whatsoever could enter the extraction area. The extraction area should be inaccessible to non-authorized people by providing adequate devices (e.g. enclosure). Any use not aiming at the collection of mineral water s should be forbidden in this are a. A.2.2.4 The exploitation of natural mineral water The condition of the extraction facilities, areas of extraction and perimeter protection as well as the quality of the mineral water s should periodically be checked. To control the stability of the chemi cal and physical particulars of the mineral water s derived, besides the natural variations, automatic measurements of the typical characteristics of water should be carried out and notified (e.g. electrical conductance, temperature, and content of carbon d ioxide) or frequent partial analysis should be done. A.2.3 Maintenance of extraction facilities A.2.3.1 Technical aspects Methods and procedures for maintaining the extraction facilities should be hygienic and not be a potential hazard to human health or a source of contamination to mineral water s. From the hygiene standpoint, servicing of the extraction installations should meet the same standards as those required for the bottling or treatment. A.2.3.2 Equipment and reservoirs Equipment and reservoirs use d for extraction of mineral water s should be constructed and maintained in order to minimize all hazards to human health and to avoid contamination. A.2.3.3 Storage at the point of extraction The quantity of mineral water s stored at the point of extraction should be as low as possible. The storing should furthermore guarantee protection against contamination or deterioration . A.2.4 Transport of mineral water s within an establishment and from the source Packaging at the source is preferred . 14 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved A.2.4.1 Means of transport, piping and reservoirs Any vehicle, piping or reservoir used in the processing of mineral water s from its source to the bottling facilities, the latter included, should comply with the necessary requirements and be made of inert material such a s ceramic and stainless steel which prevents any deterioration, be it by water, handling, servicing or disinfection; it should allow easy cleaning. A.2.4.2 Maintenance of vehicles and reservoirs Any vehicle or reservoir should be properly cleaned and disin fected and kept in good repair so as not to present any danger of contamination to mineral water s and of deterioration of the essential qualities of mineral water s. A.3 Establishment for processing mineral waters — Design and facilities A.3.1 Location Establishments should be located in areas, which are free from objectionable odours, smoke, dust or other contaminants and are not subject to flooding . A.3.2 Roadways and areas used by wheeled traffic Such roadways and areas serving the establishment, which ar e within its boundaries or in its immediate vicinity, should have a hard paved surface suitable for wheeled traffic. There should be adequate drainage and provision should be made for protection of the extraction area where appropriate and to allow for cleaning. Adequate road signals may be provided to call the attention of road users to the existence of mineral water s extraction area. A.3.3 Building and facilities A.3.3.1 Type of construction Buildings and facilitie s should be of sound constru ction and mai ntained in good condition . A.3.3.2 Disposition of holding facilities Rooms for recreation, for storing or packaging of raw material and areas for the cleaning of containers to be reused should be apart from the bottling areas to prevent the end product fro m being contaminated. Raw and packaging materials and any other additions, which come into contact with mineral water s, should be stored apart from other material. A.3.3.3 Working space Adequate working space should be provided to allow for satisfactory pe rformance of all operations. A.3.3.4 Design A.3.3.4.1 The design should be such as to permit easy and adequate cleaning and to facilitate proper supervision of mineral water s hygiene. A.3.3.4.2 The buildings and facilities should be designed to provide sep aration by partition, location or other effective means between those operations, which may cause cross -contamination. A.3.3.4.3 Buildings and facilities should be designed to facilitate hygienic operations by means of a regulated flow in the process from the arrival of the mineral water s at the premises to the finished product, and should provide for appropriate temperature conditions for the process and the product. © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 15 A.3.3.5 Mineral water s handling, storing and bottling areas A.3.3.5.1 Floors Where appropr iate, should be of waterproof, non -absorbent, washable, non -slip and non -toxic materials, without crevices, and should be easy to clean and disinfect. Where appropriate, floors should slope sufficiently for liquids to drain to trapped outlets. A.3.3.5.2 Walls Where appropriate, should be of waterproof, non -absorbent, washable and non -toxic materials and should be light coloured. Up to a height appropriate for the operation they should be smooth and without crevices, and should be easy to clean and disinfect . Where appropriate, angles between walls, between walls and floors, and between walls and ceilings should be sealed and smoothened to facilitate cleaning . A.3.3.5.3 Ceilings Should be so designed, constructed and finished as to prevent the accumulation of dirt and minimize condensation, mould development and flaking, and should be easy to clean. A.3.3.5.4 Windows Windows and other openings should be so constructed as to avoid accumulation of dirt and those which open should be fitted with screens. Screens should be easily movable for cleaning and kept in good repair. Internal windowsills, if present, should be sloped to prevent use as shelves. A.3.3.5.5 Doors Should have smooth, non -absorbent surfaces and, where appropriate, be self -closing and close fittin g. A.3.3.5.6 Stairs, lift cages and auxiliary structures Such as platforms, ladders, chutes; should be so situated and constructed as not to cause contamination to food. Chutes should be constructed with inspection and cleaning hatches . A.3.3.5.7 Piping Piping for mineral water s lines should be independent of potable and non -potable water. A.3.3.6 Overhead structures and fittings In mineral water s handling areas all overhead structures and fittings should be installed in such a manner as to avoid contaminat ion directly or indirectly of mineral water s and raw materials by condensation and drip, and should not hamper cleaning operations. They should be insulated where appropriate and be so designed and finished as to prevent the accumulation of dirt and to min imize condensation, mould development and flaking. They should be easy to clean. A.3.3.7 Other structures Living quarters, toilets and areas where animals are kept should be completely separated from and should not open directly to mineral water s handling areas. A.3.3.8 Accessibility Where appropriate, establishments should be so designed that access can be controlled. A.3.3.9 Selection of construction materials 16 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved The use of material, which cannot be adequately cleaned and disinfected, such as wood, should be avoided unless its use would not be a source of contamination. A.3.3.10 Canalization, drainage lines Canalization and drainage and used water lines as well as any possible waste storage area within the protected perimeter should be built and maintained in such a manner as not to present any risk whatsoever of polluting aquifers and springs. A.3.3.11 Fuel storage area Any storage area or tank for the storing of fuels such as coal or hydrocarbons should be designed, protected, controlled and maintained in su ch a manner as not to present a risk of aquifers and springs being polluted during the storage and manipulation of these fuels. A.3.4 Hygienic facilities A.3.4.1 Water supply A.3.4.1.1 Ample supply of potable water under adequate pressure and suitable temp erature should be available with adequate facilities for its storage, where necessary, and distribution with adequate protection against contamination. A.3.4.1.2 Mineral waters, potable water, non -potable water for steam production or for refrigeration or any other use should be carried in separate lines with no cross connection between them and without any chance of back siphonage. It would be desirable that these lines be identified by different colours. Steam used in direct contact with mineral water s and mineral water s contact surfaces should contain no substances, which may be hazardous to health or may contaminate the food. A.3.4.2 Effluent and waste disposal Establishments should have an efficient effluent and waste disposal system, which should at al l time s be maintained in good order and repair. All effluent lines (including sewer systems) should be large enough to carry full loads and should be so constructed as to avoid contamination of potable water supplies. A.3.4.3 Changing facilities and toilet s A.3.4.3.1 Adequate, suitable and conveniently located changing facilities and toilets should be provided in all establishments. A.3.4.3.2 Toilets should be so designed as to ensure hygienic removal of waste matter. These areas should be well lighted, ve ntilated and where appropriate heated, and should not open directly to mineral water s handling areas. A.3.4.3.3 Hand washing facilities with warm or hot and cold water, a suitable hand -cleaning preparation, and with suitable hygienic means of drying hands , should be provided adjacent to toilets and in such a position that the employee will have to use them when returning to the processing area. Where hot and cold water are available mixing taps should be provided. A.3.4.3.4 Where paper towels are used, a sufficient number of dispensers and receptacles should be provided near each washing facility. Care should be taken that these receptacles for used paper towels are regularly emptied. A.3.4.3.5 Taps of a non -hand operatable type are desirable. Notices s hould be posted directing personnel to wash their hands after using the toilet. © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 17 A.3.4.4 Hand washing facilities in mineral water processing areas Adequate and conveniently located facilities for hand washing and drying should be provided wherever the proce ss demands. Where appropriate, facilities for hand disinfection should also be provided. Warm or hot and cold water should be available and taps for mixing the two should be provided. There should be suitable hygienic means of drying hands. Where paper tow els are used, a sufficient number of dispensers and receptacles should be provided adjacent to each washing facility. Taps of a non -hand operatable type are desirable. The facilities should be furnished with properly trapped waste pipes leading to drains. A.3.4.5 Disinfection facilities Where appropriate, adequate facilities or cleaning and disinfection of working implements and equipment should be provided. These facilities should be constructed of corrosion resistant materials, capable of being easily cle aned, and should be fitted with suitable means of supplying hot and cold water in sufficient quantities. A.3.4.6 Lighting Adequate natural or artificial lighting should be provided throughout the establishment. Where appropriate, the lighting should not al ter colours and the intensity should not be less than : a) 540 lux (50 foot candles) at all inspection points ; b) 220 lux (20 foot candles) in work rooms ; and c) 110 lux (10 foot candles) in other areas. Light bulbs and fixtures suspended over mineral water s in any stage of production should be of a safer type and protected to prevent contamination of mineral water s in case of breakage. A.3.4.7 Ventilation Adequate ventilation should be provided to prevent excessive heat, steam condensation and dust and to remove con taminated air. The direction of the airflow should never be from a dirty area to a clean area. Ventilation openings should be provided with a screen or other protecting enclosure of non -corrodible material. Screens should be easily removable for cleaning. A.3.4.8 Facilities for storage of waste and inedible material Facilities should be provided for the storage of waste and inedible material prior to removal from the establishment. These facilities should be designed to prevent access to waste or inedible m aterial by pests and to avoid contamination of mineral water s, potable water, equipment, buildings or roadways on the premises . A.3.5 Equipment and utensils A.3.5.1 Materials All equipment and utensils used in mineral water handling areas and which may con tact the natural mineral water should be made of material which does not transmit toxic substances, odour or taste, is non -absorbent, is resistant to corrosion and is capable of withstanding repeated cleaning and disinfection. Surfaces should be smooth and free from pits and crevices. The use of wood and other materials, which cannot be adequately cleaned and disinfected, should be avoided e specially when their use would be a source of contamination. The use of different materials is exercised in such a way that contact corrosion that can occur should be avoided. 18 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved A.3.5.2 Hygienic design, construction and installation All equipment and utensils should be so designed and constructed as to prevent hazards and permit easy and thorough cleaning and disinfection. A.4 Hygiene requirements for the e stablishment A.4.1 Maintenance The buildings, equipment, utensils and all other physical facilities of the establishment, including drains, should be maintained in good repai r and in an orderly condition. As far as practic able, rooms should be kept protected from steam, vapour and surplus water. A.4.2 Cleaning and disinfection A.4.2.1 Cleaning and disinfection should meet the requirements of this standard. A.4.2.2 To prevent contamination of mineral water, all equipment and utensils should be cleaned as frequently as necessary and disinfected, whenever circumstances demand. A.4.2.3 Adequate precautions should be taken to prevent mineral water from being contaminated during cleaning or disinfection of rooms, equipment or uten sils, by water and detergents or by disinfectants and their solutions. Detergents and disinfectants should be suitable for the purpose intended and should be acceptable to the official agency having jurisdiction. Any residues of these agents on a surface, which may come in contact with mineral water, should be removed by thorough rinsing with water, before the y are or equipment is again used for handling mineral water. A.4.2.4 Either immediately after cessation of work for the day or at such other times as may be appropriate, floors, including drains, auxiliary structures and walls of mineral water handling areas should be thoroughly cleaned. A.4.2.5 Changing facilities and toilets should be kept clean at all times. A.4.2.6 Roadways and yards in the immediat e vicinity of and serving the premises should be kept clean. A.4.3 Hygiene control programme A permanent cleaning and disinfection schedule should be drawn up for each establishment to ensure that all areas are appropriately cleaned and that critical areas , equipment and material are designated for special attention. An individual, who should preferably be a permanent member of the staff of the establishment and whose duties should be independent of production, should be appointed to be responsible for the cleanliness of the establishment. He should have a thorough understanding of the significance of contamination and the hazards involved. All cleaning personnel should be well trained in cleaning techniques. A.4.4 Storage and disposal of waste Waste materia l should be handled in such a manner as to avoid contamination of mineral water or potable water. Care should be taken to prevent access to waste by pests. Waste should be removed from the mineral water handling and other working areas as often as necessar y and at least daily. Immediately after disposal of the waste, receptacles used for storage and any equipment, which has come into contact with the waste, should be cleaned and disinfected. The waste storage area should also be cleaned and disinfected. A.4.5 Exclusion of animals Animals that are uncontrolled or that could be a hazard to health should be excluded from establishments. Formatted: English (United States) © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 19 A.4.6 Pest control A.4.6.1 There should be an effective and continuous programme for the control of pests. Establishments and surrounding areas should be regularly examined for evidence of infestation. A.4.6.2 Should pests gain entrance to the establishment, eradication measures should be instituted. Control measures involving treatment with chemical, physical or biological agent s should only be undertaken by or under direct supervision of personnel who have a thorough understanding of the potential hazards to health resulting from the use of these agents, including those hazards which may arise from residues retained in the miner al water, such measures should only be carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the official agency having jurisdiction. A.4.6.3 Pesticides should only be used if other precautionary measures cannot be used effectively. Before pesticides are a pplied, care should be taken to safeguard mineral water equipment and utensils from contamination. After application, contaminated equipment and utensils should be thoroughly cleaned to remove residues prior to being used again. A.4.7 Storage of hazardous substances A.4.7.1 Pesticides or other substances, which may present a hazard to health, should be suitably labeled with a warning about their toxicity and use. They should be stored in locked rooms or cabinets used only for that purpose and dispersed and handled only by authorized and properly trained personnel or by persons under strict supervision of trained personnel. Extreme care should be taken to avoid contamination of mineral water. A.4.7.2 Except when necessary for hygienic or processing purposes, no substance which could contaminate mineral water should be used or stored in mineral water handling areas. A.4.8 Personal effects and clothing Personal effects and clothing should not be deposited in mineral water handling areas. A.5 Personnel hygiene an d health requirements A.5.1 Hygiene training Managers of establishments should arrange for adequate and continuing straining of all mineral handlers in hygienic handling of mineral water and in personal hygiene so that they understand the precautions neces sary to prevent contamination of mineral water. A.5.2 Medical examination Persons who come into contact with natural mineral water in the course of their work should have a scheduled medical examination if the official agency having jurisdiction, acting on medical advice, considers that this is necessary, whether because of epidemiological considerations or the medical history of the prospective natural mineral water handler. Medical examination of mineral water handlers should be carried out at other times when clinically or epidemiologically indicated. A.5.3 Communicable diseases The management should take care to ensure that no person, while known or suspected to be suffering from, or to be a carrier of a disease likely to be transmitted through food or w hile afflicted with infected wounds, skin infections, sores or with diarrhoea, is permitted to work in any mineral water handling area in any capacity in which there is any likelihood of such a person directly or indirectly contaminating mineral water with pathogenic micro -organisms. Any person so affected should immediately report to the management. 20 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved A.5.4 Injuries Any persons who has a cut or wound should not continue to handle mineral water or miner al water contact surfaces until the injury is completely protected by a waterproof covering which is firmly secured, and which is conspicuous in colour. Adequate first -aid facilities should be provided for this purpose. A.5.5 Washing of hands Every person, while on duty in a natural mineral water handling area, should wash his hands frequently and thoroughly with a suitable hand cleaning preparation under running water. Hands should always be washed before commencing work, immediately after using the toilet, after handling contaminated material and whenever else necessary. After handling any material, which might be capable of transmitting disease, hands should be washed and disinfected immediately. Notices requiring hand washing should be displayed. There should be adequate supervision to ensure compliance with t his requirement . A.5.6 Personal cleanliness Every person engaged in a mineral water handling area should maintain a high degree of personal cleanliness while on duty, and should at all times while so engaged, wear suitable protective clothing including hea d covering and footwear, all of which should be cleanable, unless designed to be disposed of and should be maintained in a clean condition consistent with the nature of the work in which the person is engaged. Aprons and similar items should not be washed on the floor. When mineral water is manipulated by hand, any jewellery that cannot be adequately disinfected should be removed from the hands. Personnel should not wear any insecure jewellery when engaged in handling of mineral water. A.5.7 Personal behavi or Any behavior, which could result in contamination of mineral water, such as eating, use of tobacco, chewing (e.g. gum, sticks, betel nuts, etc) or unhygienic practices such as spitting, should be prohibited in mineral water handling areas. A.5.8 Visitor s Precautions should be taken to prevent visitors to mineral water handling areas from contaminating the product. These may include the use of protective clothing. Visitors should observe the provisions recommended in paragraph A.5.8, A.6.3, A.6.4 and A.6. 7. A.5.9 Supervision Responsible for ensuring compliance by all personnel with all requirements of A. 5.1 to A. 5.8 inclusive should be specifically allocated to competent supervisory personnel. A.6 Hygienic processing requirements for the e stablishment - A.6.1 Raw material To guarantee a good and stable quality of mineral water, certain criteria should be monitored regularly : a) spring discharge , b) appearance , c) odour and taste , d) conductance , © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 21 e) microbiological flora , or f) any other adequate parameter. In case of non -compliance to the standard, necessary corrective measures should immediately be taken. A.6.2 Treatment The treatment may include decantation, filtration, airing and where necessary decarbonation . A.6.2.1 Processing should be supervised by technically competen t personnel. A.6.2.2 All steps in the production process, including packaging, should be performed without unnecessary delay and under conditions which will prevent the possibility of contamination, deterioration, or the development of pathogenic and spoil age micro -organisms. A.6.2.3 Rough treatment of containers should be avoided to prevent the possibility of contamination of the processed product. A.6.2.4 Controls should be put in place to protect against contamination or development of a public health hazards and against deterioration within the limits of good commercial practice. A.6.3 Packaging material and containers A.6.3.1 All packaging material should be stored in a clean and hygienic manner. The material should be appropriate for the product to be packed and for the expected conditions of storage and should not transmit to the product objectionable substances beyond the limits acceptable to the official agency having jurisdiction. The packaging material should be sound and should provide appropriate protection from contamination. Only packaging material required for immediate use should be kept in the packing or filling area. A.6.3.2 Product containers should not have been used for any purpose that may lead to contamination of the product. In case of new containers if there is a possibility that they have been contaminated, shou ld be cleaned and disinfected. When chemicals are used for these purposes, the container should be rinsed as prescribed under A.4.2.3. Containers should be well drained after r insing. Used and, when necessary, unused containers should be inspected immediately before filling. A.6.4 Filling and sealing of containers A.6.4.1 Packaging should be done under conditions that preclude the introduction of contaminants into the product. A.6.4.2 The methods, equipment and material used for sealing should guarantee a tight and impervious sealing and should not damage the containers nor deteriorate the chemical bacteriological and organoleptic qualities of mineral water. A.6.5 Packaging of co ntainers The packaging of containers should protect the latter from contamination and damage and allow appropriate handling and storing. A.6.6 Lot identification Each container shall be permanently marked in code or in clear to identify the producing fact ory and the lot. A lot is quantity of mineral water produced under identical conditions, all packages of which should bear a lot number that identifies the production during a particular time, interval, and usually from a particular "line" or other critica l processing unit. 22 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved A.6.7 Processing and production records Permanent, legible and dated records of pertinent processing and production details should be kept concerning each lot. These records should be retained for a period that exceeds the shelf life of the product. Records should also be kept of the initial distribution by lot. A.6.8 Storage and transport of the end product The end -product should be stored and transported under such conditions as will preclude contamination with and/or proliferation of m icro-organisms and protect against deterioration of the product or damage to the container. During storage, periodic inspection of the end product should take place to ensure that only mineral water, which is fit for human consumption, is dispatched and th at end -product specifications should be complied with. © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 23 Annex B (normative) Sampling plan for packaged mineral water B.1 Requirements of sampling B.1.1 General In drawing, preparing, storing and handling s amples, the following precautions and directions shall be observed : a) Sample shall be drawn in original sealed bottle/container and kept in protected place not exposed to damp air, dust or soot; and b) Each bottle/container shall be sealed and marke d with full details of sampling. B.1.2 Scale of sampling B.1.2.1 The quantity of packaged mineral waters of the same type belonging to the same batch of manufacture and packed in a day, shall constitute a lot. B.1.2.2 For ascertaining the conformity of the mater ial to the requirements of the specification, samples shall be tested from each lot separately. B.1.2.3 The number of containers to be selected from a lot shall depend on the size of the lot and shall be according to Table B.1. Table B.1 — Scale of samplin g Number of containers in the lot (L) Sample size (2) L ≤ 5000 3 5000 < L ≤ 10000 5 10000 < L ≤ 15000 7 L> 15000 9 B.1.2.3.1 The containers shall be chosen at random from the lot. In order to ensure the randomness of selection, procedure given in ISO 24153 ;" Random sampling and randomization procedures shall be followed. B.1.2.4 Initially the number of cartons equal to the number of containers to be taken from the lot (according to column 2 of Table B.1) shall be chosen at random. These cartons thus selected shall be opened and the containers in these carton s examined visually for the condition of packing, external appearance and the fill. The lot shall be considered satisfactory for inspection of other characteristics given in the specification, if all the containers in the cartons opened are found satisfact ory for these characteristics. B.1.2.5 In case of any defective container is found according to B.1.2.4, twice the number of cartons shall be opened and the container examined for these characteristics. If no defective container is found, the lot shall be considered satisfactory of inspection of other characteristics given in the specification. 24 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved B.1.3 Preparation of test samples B.1.3.1 From each of the cartons opened according to B.1.2.4, three containers shall be taken from its different layers so as to ob tain three times the required number of containers in the sample (see col. 2 of Table B.1). B.1.3.2 In case the number of cartons to be opened is according to B.1.2.4, the number of cartons equal to the number of containers in the sample shall be taken at random from these cartons and then the required number of containers picked up according to B.1.3.1. B.1.3.3 The sample bottles selected as in B.1.3.1 or B.1.3.2 shall be divided at random into three equal sets and labeled with all the particulars of sampl ing. One of these sets of sampled containers shall be for the purchaser, another for vendor and the third for referee. B.1.3.4 Referee sample Referee sample shall consist of a set of sample containers marked for this purpose and shall bear the details of the purchaser and the supplier. These shall be kept at a place agreeable to the purchaser and the supplier so as to be used in case of a dispute between the two. B.1.4 Criteria for conformity The lot shall be declared as conforming to the requirements of th e relevant specification if all the parameters are satisfied. © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 25 Annex C (informative) Water Safety plan C.1 Packaged mineral water s operators shall develop, implement and maintain a water safety plan taking into consideration the potential risks to the safety of the water from the supply catchment area up to the consumer. C.2 A water safety plan shall consist of three key components: a) system assessment to determine whether the mineral water s supply chain ( up to the point of consumption) as a whole, can deliver water of a quality that meets health -based targets; b) identifying control measures in a mineral water system that will collectively control identified risks and ensure that the health -based targets are met; and c) management plans describing actions to be taken during normal operation or incident conditions, documenting the system assessment (including upgrade and improvement), monitoring, communication plans and supporting programmes. C.3 A water safety plan shall include measures to protect the source of drinking water from risks of pollution. a) measures to ensure all installations intended for the production of drinking water exclude any possibility of contamination. For this purpose and in part icular: i) the installation for collection, the pipes and the reservoirs shall be made from materials suited to the water and in such a way as to prevent the introduction of foreign substances in water; and ii) the equipment and its use for production sh all meet hygienic requirements; b) measures to ensure an appropriate treatment such as pre -treatment processes, coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection are undertaken to assure the safety of water for the consumers; and c) appropriate operational monitoring system including monitoring parameters that can be measured and for which limits have been set to define the operational effectiveness of the activity; frequency of monitoring and procedures for corrective action that can b e implemented in response to deviation from limits. If, during production it is found that the water is polluted, the producer shall stop all operations until the cause of pollution is eliminated; and a verification plan to ensure that individual component s of a mineral -waters system, and system as a whole is operating safely. 26 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved Annex D (normative) Surveillance D.1 General surveillance requirements Mineral water s producers sh all ensure, at all times, the quality and safety of the water that they produce. Public health surveillance (that is, surveillance of health status and trends) contributes to verifying drinking - water safety. Adequate infrastructure, proper monitoring and effe ctive planning and management; and a system of independent surveillance are basic and essential requirements to ensure the safety of mineral water s. Surveillance shall cover the total supply network from the source of untreated water to the consumer deliv ery points. A sampling programme that takes into consideration appropriate international standards shall be established and implemented. The sampling shall be regular and its frequency shall mainly depend on the following factors: a) quality of water harn essed including effects on the water from climatic, human and industrial activities; b) type of treatment for drinking worthiness; c) volume of water processed; d) risks of contamination; e) background of public water supply network; f) population ser ved; and g) capabilities of the analytical facility (both in terms of capacity and in terms of analytical performance) . Formatted: French (France) Field Code Changed Field Code Changed Field Code ChangedFormatted: French (France) © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved 27 Bibliography [1] EAS 13 , Packaged mineral water – Specification, third edition 2018. [2] WHO , Guidelines for drinking water quality, fourth edition 2011. [3] Codex Stan 108 , Standard for natural mineral waters, adopted 1981 and amended 2011. DEAS 13: 2022 © EAC 2022 – All rights reserved

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBTN13_USA777R1A1.pdf

q_G_TBTN13_USA777R1A1

G/TBT/N/USA/777/Rev.1/Add.1 2 September 2020 (20-5979) Page: 1/2 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Original: English NOTIFICATION Addendum The following communication , dated 2 September 2020 , is being circulated at the request of the delegation of the United States of America . _______________ Title: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Reason for Addendum: [X] Comment period changed - date: 16 September 2020 [ ] Notified measure adopted - date: [ ] Notified measure published - date: [X] Notified measure enters into force - date: 28 August 2020 [ ] Text of final measure available from1: [ ] Notified measure withdrawn or revoked - date: Relevant symbol if measure re -notified: [ ] Content or scope of notified measure changed New deadline for comments (if applicable): [ ] Interpretive guidance issued and text available from1: [X] Other: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -2020-09-01/html/2020 -19334.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -2020-09-01/pdf/2020 -19334.pdf https://members.wto .org/crnattachments/2020/TBT/USA/20_5261_00_e.pdf Interim final rule; request for comments Description: AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT) ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments SUMMARY: This interim final rule responds to an "emergency petition" submitted by the Alliance of Automotiv e Innovation (Alliance) regarding the phase -in and compliance requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 141 (FMVSS 141), "Minimum sound for hybrid and electric vehicles." The petition details the challenges manufacturers have encountered in complying with FMVSS 141 due to disruptions in the supply chain caused by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID - 19) public health emergency. The petition requests three changes to the phase -in and compliance requirements of FMVSS 141. After considering the concerns raised in the petition, NHTSA has decided to grant the petition, in part, by electing to defer the phase -in and compliance dates by six 1 This information can be provided by including a website address, a pdf attachment, or other information on where the text of the final measure and/or interpretive guidance can be obtained. G/TBT/N/USA/777/Rev.1/Add.1 - 2 - months. NHTSA is denying the request for an alternative performance option during the phase -in period. DATES: Effective date: The amendments made in this rule are effective 28 August 2020. Comment date: You should submit your comments early enough to ensure that the docket receives them not later than 16 September 2020. This interim final rule; request for comment s is identified by Docket Number NHTSA -2020-0086. The Docket Folder is available on Regulations.gov at https://www.regul ations.gov/docket?D=NHTSA - 2020-0086 and provides access to primary and supporting documents as well as comments received. Documents are also accessible from Regulations.gov by searching the Docket Numb er. WTO Members and their stakeholders are asked to submit comments to the USA TBT Enquiry Point. Comments received by the USA TBT Enquiry Point from WTO Members and their stakeholders will be shared with the regulator and will also be submitted to the Docket on Regulations.gov if received within the comment period. The notice of proposed rulemaking notified as G/TBT /N/USA/777 is identified by Docket Number NHTSA -2011-0148. The Docket Folder is available on Regulations.gov at https:/ /www.regulations.gov/docket?D=NHTSA -2011-0148and provides access to primary and supporting documents as well as comments received. Documents are also accessible from Regulations.gov by searching the Docket Number. Related rulemaking actions notified as G/TBT/N/USA/777/Add.1 , USA/777/Add.2 , USA/777/Add.3 , USA/777/Add.4 , USA/777/Add.5 , and USA/777/Add .6 are identified by Docket Number NHTSA - 2016-0125. The Docket Folder is available on https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=NHTSA - 2016-0125 and provides access to primary and supporting documents as well as comments received. Documents are also accessible from Regulations.gov by searching the Docket Number. The action notified as G/TBT/N/USA/777/Rev.1 is identified by Docket Number NHTSA -2018-0018. The Docket Folder is available on https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=NHTSA -2018-0018 and provides access to primary and supporting documents as well as comments received. Documents are also accessible from Regulations.gov by searching the Docket Number. A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) from NHTSA published on 17 September 2019, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 141, Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles, was notified as G/TBT/N/USA/1526 , issued 19 September 2019. The Docket ID for this NOPR is NHTSA -2019-0085. The Docket Folder is available on Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=NHTSA -2019-0085 and provides access to primary and supporting documents as well as comments received. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TFA_NKEN1A1.pdf

s_G_TFA_NKEN1A1

G/TFA/N/KEN/1/Add.1 23 de octubre de 2023 (23-7118) Página: 1/4 Comité de Facilitación del Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN DE LOS COMPROMISOS DE LAS DIFERENTES CATEGORÍAS EN VIRTUD DEL ACUERDO SOBRE FACILITACIÓN DEL COMERCIO COMUNICACIÓN DE KENYA Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 18 de octubre de 2023, se distribuye a petición de la delegación de Kenya. _______________ Kenya tiene el honor de notificar que las disposiciones que se indican a continuación se han aplicado plenamente antes de los plazos iniciales: G/TFA/N/KEN/1/Add.1 - 2 - Disposición Título/descripción Categoría Fecha definitiva para la aplicación notificada anteriormente Nueva fecha definitiva para la aplicación Referencia administrativa/normativa Enlace (en su caso) Artículo 1.1 Publicación B 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 Ley Nº 25 del Sistema Electrónico Nacional de Ventanilla Única, de 2022 http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2025%20of%202022 Artículo 1.2 Información disponible por medio de Internet C 30 de junio de 2029 8 de septiembre de 2023 Ley Nº 25 del Sistema Electrónico Nacional de Ventanilla Única, de 2022 Infotradekenya es una plataforma en línea que proporciona información sobre los procedimientos de importación, exportación y tránsito de Kenya, así como sobre la documentación correspondiente. También proporciona información sobre las leyes y los reglamentos aplicables, así como sobre las resoluciones anticipadas y el Programa de OEA, entre otras cuestiones http://kenyal aw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2025%20of%202022 https://infotradekenya.go.ke/ Artículo 2.1 Oportunidad de formular observaciones e información antes de la entrada en vigor B 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 Constitución de Kenya Ley sobre los Instrumentos Legislativos (Ley Nº 23, de 2013) http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2023%20of%202013 #part_II Artículo 2.2 Consultas B 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 Constitución de Kenya (artículo 2, apartados 5) y 6)) Ley sobre los Instrumentos Legislativos (Ley Nº 23, de 2013) http://kenyalaw.org/kl/index.php?id=398 http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2023%20of%202013 #part_II Artículo 3 Resoluciones anticipadas B 30 de junio de 2025 8 de septiembre de 2023 La Administración de Aduanas prevé resoluciones anticipadas sobre la clasificación arancelaria y el origen de las mercancías https://www.kra.go.ke/helping -tax- payers/faqs/advance - ruling#:~:text=Advance%20Ruling%20is% 20a%20written%20decision%20concerning %20the,to%20an%20applicant%20prior%2 0to%20importation%20of%20goods . G/TFA/N/KEN/1/Add.1 - 3 - Disposición Título/descripción Categoría Fecha definitiva para la aplicación notificada anteriormente Nueva fecha definitiva para la aplicación Referencia administrativa/normativa Enlace (en su caso) Artículo 7.2 Pago electrónico B 30 de junio de 2028 8 de septiembre de 2023 Ley Nº 25 del Sistema Electrónico Nacional de Ventanilla Única, de 2022 http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2025%20of%202022 Artículo 7.3 Separación entre el levante y la determinación definitiva de los derechos de aduana, impuestos, tasas y cargas B 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 Reglamento de Administración de Aduanas de la Comunidad de África Oriental (EACCMR) El Departamento de Aduanas también prevé la separación entre el levante y la determinación definitiva https://ikesra.kra.go.ke/bit stream/handle/1 23456789/88/EAC_Customs_Management_ Regulations.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Artículo 7.5 Auditoría posterior al despacho de aduana C 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 El artículo 235.1) de la Ley de Administración de Aduanas de la Comunidad de África Oriental (EACCMA) prevé la auditoría posterior al despacho de aduana http://www.kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfd ownloads/EALA_Legislation/East_African_Co mmunity_Customs_Management_Act_200 4. pdf Artículo 7.8 Envíos urgentes C 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 Artículos 36 a 38 de la EACCMA; y artículos 112 y 119 del EACCMR, que prevén el levante rápido de determinados envíos http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownlo ads/EALA_Legislation/East_African_Commu nity_Customs_Management_Act_2004.pdf https://ikesra.kra.go.ke/bitstream/handle/1 23456789/88/EAC_Customs_Management_ Regulations.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Artículo 8 Cooperación entre los organismos que intervienen en la frontera C 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 Puestos fronterizos de ventanilla única de la CAO. Se han establecido puestos fronterizos de ventanilla única en la mayoría de las fronteras de Kenya https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?u rl=https://www.eala.org/uploads/EAC_One_ Stop_Border_Post_Act_2016_1.pdf Artículo 10.2 Aceptación de copias C 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 La ventanilla única permi te el uso de copias electrónicas de documentos relativos a las formalidades de importación, exportación y tránsito. El Sistema aduanero también lo permite http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2025%20of%202022 Artículo 10.4 Ventanilla única C 30 de junio de 2033 8 de septiembre de 2023 Ley Nº 25 del Sistema Electrónico Nacional de Ventanilla Única, de 2022 http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/ac tview.xql?actid=No.%2025%20of%202022 G/TFA/N/KEN/1/Add.1 - 4 - __________ Disposición Título/descripción Categoría Fecha definitiva para la aplicación notificada anteriormente Nueva fecha definitiva para la aplicación Referencia administrativa/normativa Enlace (en su caso) Artículo 10.7 Procedimientos en frontera comunes y requisitos de documentación uniformes B 30 de junio de 2026 8 de septiembre de 2023 EACCMA , de 2004 EACCMR, de 2010 Territorio aduanero único Formalidades Normas de origen de la CAO http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownlo ads/EALA_Legislation/East_African_Commu nity_Customs_Management_Act_2004.pdf https://ikesra.kra.go.ke/bitstream/handle/1 23456789/88/EAC_Customs_Management_ Regulation s.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y http://repository.eac.int/bitstream/handle/1 1671/332/SCT%20Procedure%20Manual%2 0-%20July%202014%20 - %20DAR%20Final%20Version%201.pdf?seq uence=1&isAllowed=y https://www.kra.go.ke/images/publications/ EAC-Rules -of-Origin -2015.pdf Artículo 10.9 Admisión temporal de mercancías y perfeccionamiento activo y pasivo B 30 de junio de 2024 8 de septiembre de 2023 Las aduanas y otros organismos que intervienen en frontera prevén la admisión temporal de mercancías, así como el perfeccionamiento activo y pasivo. Está previsto en los artículos 185.1), 186.2), 192.1) y 193.2) de la EACCMA, de 2004 http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownlo ads/EALA_Legislation/East_African_Com mu nity_Customs_Management_Act_2004.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_IP_C_M94.pdf

q_IP_C_M94

RESTRICTED IP/C/M/94 14 February 2020 (20-1203) Page: 1/9 Council for Trade -Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights MINUTES OF MEETING HELD IN THE CENTRE W ILLIAM RAPPARD ON 6 FEBRUARY 2020 Chair: H.E. Ambassador Lundeg Purevsuren The present document contains the record of the meeting of the Council for TRIPS held on 6 February 2020. The statements made during the meeting will be circulated in an addendum to the present document. Table of Contents 1 NOTIFICATIONS UN DER PROVISIONS OF TH E AGREEMENT ................................ ........ 3 2 REVIEW OF NATION AL IMPLEMENTING LEGI SLATION ................................ ................ 4 3 REVIEW OF THE PR OVISIONS OF ARTICLE 27.3(B) ................................ ..................... 4 4 RELATIONSHIP BET WEEN THE TRIPS AGR EEMENT AND THE CONVE NTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 4 5 PROTECTION OF TR ADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE ................................ ..... 4 6 NON-VIOLATION AN D SITUATION COMPLAIN TS ................................ ......................... 5 7 REVIEW OF THE IM PLEMENTATION OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT UNDE R ARTICLE 71.1 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 5 8 REVIEW OF THE AP PLICAT ION OF THE PROVISION S OF THE SECTION ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICAT IONS UNDER ARTICLE 2 4.2 ................................ ...................... 6 9 SEVENTEENTH ANNU AL REVIEW UNDER PARA GRAPH 2 OF THE DECISION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION O F ARTICLE 66.2 OF TH E TRIPS AGREEMENT .............................. 6 10 TECHNICAL COOPE RATION AND CAPACITY -BUILDING ................................ .............. 6 11 DRAFT CODEX ALI MENTARIUS STANDARD - DEFINITION OF 'CROS S PROMOTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 7 12 INTELLECTUAL PR OPERTY AND INNOVATIO N: ................................ .......................... 7 12.1 Summary of the 2019 Theme "Public -private Collaborations in Innovation" .......... 7 12.2 2020 Theme "Making MSMES Competitive" – February 2020 Subtheme "Making MSMES Competitive Through Trademarks" ................................ ......................... 7 13 INTELLECTUAL PR OPERTY AND THE PUBLI C INTEREST: THE WTO TRIPS AGREEMENT AND THE CO PYRIGHT THREE -STEP T EST ................................ ...................... 7 14 INFORMATION ON RELEVANT DEVELOPMENT S ELSEWHERE IN THE W TO ................. 7 14.1 TRIPS Amendment ................................ ................................ ................................ . 8 14.2 IPR-Related Issues in Trade Policy Reviews and the Director -General's Monitoring Reports ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 8 15 OBSERVER STATUS FOR INTERNATIONAL I NTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 8 16 OTHER BUSINESS ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 8 IP/C/M/94 - 2 - 16.1 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce ................................ ............................ 8 16.2 Dates of Next Meeting ................................ ................................ ............................ 9 17 ELECTION OF THE CHAIRPERSON ................................ ................................ .............. 9 IP/C/M/94 - 3 - 1 NOTIFICATIONS UNDER PROVISIONS OF THE AG REEMENT 1. The Chair invited the Secretariat to report on notifications that the Council had re ceived since its meeting in October 2019. 2. A representative of the Secretariat said that the Council had received the following notifications under Article 63.2 of the TRIPS Agreement: a. The Kyrgyz Republic had notified Law No. 45 related to the property rights to a computer program or database created under a government contract; Law No. 50, e nacting the Kyrgyz Republic's accession to the Marrakech Treaty for the Blind and the Visually Impaired; and a Law ratifying the Amendment to the TRIPS Agreement; b. The European Union had notified amendments, and a consolidated version of the 2017 Regulation on the European Union trademark; the 2017 Regulation on cross -border portability of online content services in the internal market; amendments to the Directive implementing the European Union's obligation under the Marrakech Treat for the Blind and Visual ly Impaired; the 2019 Directive amending the rules on copyright relating to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organizations; the 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market; and, a 2019 Regulation amending rules on supplementary pro tection certificates for medicinal products. c. The Russian Federation had notified an amendment to the Civil Code and other laws, which set out the protection system for Geographical Indications; d. Brazil had notified two resolutions pertaining to patent requi rements in relation to prior art searches carried out by Patent offices of other countries, international or regional organizations; e. The Republic of Korea had notified an amendment and a consolidated version of the Patent Act, introducing inter alia a pa tent filing system for foreign languages ; an Enforcement Decree relating to the Patents Act ; and a consolidated version of the Trademarks Act ; f. Chinese Taipei had notified a consolidated version of its Enforcement Rules of the Patent Act ; g. Ukraine had notified a Law updating its system for protection of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin; a law amending its rules on protection of rights in topographies of Semiconductor Products; and a law amending the Customs' rules on treatment of counterfei t and pirated goods ; h. The Czech Republic has notified a consolidated version of its Trademarks Act, accommodating substantial changes to the Trademark registration process, including the introduction of certification marks, the abolition of a requirement for graphical representation, and introdu ces new trademark types, such as multimedia, positional and hologram marks ; i. Hong Kong, China had notified an Ordinance and Patent Rules introducing the legal framework for setting up a new "original grant " patent system and refining the pre -existing short-term patent system ; j. Canada had notified a consolidated version of its Patent Rules, which included changes following the implementation of the Patent Law Treaty ; k. China had notified its new "Anti -Unfair Com petition Law" , which further improve d trade secret protection; and a consolidated version of its Trademark Law following its fourth revision, which aims to strengthen trademark protection and curb bad faith trademark registrations. 3. He added that, u nder Art icle 69 , the Kyrgyz Republic , the Republic of Korea , Vanuatu and India had provided information on contact points for the exchange of information and cooperation on trade in infringing goods . He noted that, so far 67 Members and 5 international organizatio ns, that are IP/C/M/94 - 4 - observers, had requested log -in credentials for the e -TRIPS system, and virtually all the submissions of laws under Article 63.2 and of contact points under Article 69 had been made using the e -TRIPS Submission System. The Secretariat, particu larly the e-TRIPS team, was ready to assist delegations to further increase use of the system, also for the submission of reports on technical assistance under Article. 67 and on incentives for technology transfer under Article 66.2. 4. The Chair invited delegations that had notified new or revised legislative measure s, or submitted updates to their contact points , to introduce their notifications. He also invited other delegations to comment on them. 5. The representatives of the European Union ; the Republic of Korea ; Ukraine ; Canada ; China ; the Russian Federation ; Brazil ; Hong Kong, China ; Chinese Taipei ; the United Kingdom ; and , Kingdom of Saudi Arabia took the floor. 6. The Chair noted that notifications to the Council were not keeping up with the actual development of laws and regulations relating to TRIPS. He emphasized that Article 63.2 was not a one -off requirement. It obliged Members to notify any new or amended laws , so that the Counci l was in a position to exercise its monitoring function . He urged Members to keep their notifications updated by submitting any new or revised laws or regulations to the Council, as well as completing their initial notifications in case any material was still outstanding. This applied also to the Checklist of Issues on Enforcement, which had been established by the Council as an element of Members' ongoing notification obligations. He invited Members to submit their notifications through the e-TRIPS Notific ation System and to contact the Secretariat for any further questions. 7. The Council took note of the notifications and the statements made. 2 REVIEW OF NATIONAL IMPLEME NTING LEGISLATION 8. The Chair recalled that the Council was preparing for the review of the n ational implementing legislation of Samoa. As noted at the October 2019 meeting , Samoa was in the process of revising their laws once again, as it had just acceded to four WIPO treaties. Considering the substantial revisions that were to be expected, the Council had agreed to wait for the notification of the revised domestic laws of Samoa, before commencing the review. He propose d that the Secretariat remain in contact with Samoa on the progress of i ts new legislation , and that the Council revert to the arrangements for Samoa's review at its next meeting. 9. He noted that there were currently no reviews pending under this item. Members should, however, revert to any matter raised in past reviews, or mak e suggestions regarding further reviews. Any ideas how to make best use of this agenda item would be most welcome. 10. The Council took note of the information provided and agreed to proceed with the arrangements for the review of Samoa's national implementati on legislation as proposed by the Chair . 3 REVIEW OF THE PROVIS IONS OF ARTICLE 27.3 (B) 4 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 5 PROTECTION OF TRADIT IONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE 11. The Chair proposed that, following past practice, agenda items 3, 4 and 5 be addressed together. He recalled that one tool for the review under item 3 was the information provided by Members in response to a list of questions on Article 27.3(b). Last year the Council had rece ived the responses by Ukraine and Mexico. These had been the first responses after 15 years. He encouraged delegations to submit responses to this Checklist or update their previous responses; as well as notify any relevant changes in legislation. IP/C/M/94 - 5 - 12. He noted that t wo longstanding procedural issues under these items h ad been discussed extensively on the record, at every regular meeting of the Council for several years: a. first, the suggestion for the Secretariat to update the three factual notes on the Council's discussions on the TRIPS and CBD and related items; these notes were initially prepared in 2002 and last updated in 2006; and b. second, the request to invite the CBD Secretariat to brief the Council on the Nagoya Protocol to the CBD, initially proposed in October 2010. 13. Positions on these issues were well -known and already extensively recorded in the Council minutes. In addressing these procedural questions, he encourage d delegations to focus on suggestions as to how to resolve them. 14. The representatives of Brazil ; India; Bangladesh ; Nigeria ; China ; Indonesia ; Kenya ; South Africa ; Ukraine ; the United States of America ; Switzerland ; Japan ; Canada ; and Plurinational State of Bolivia took the floor. 15. The C ouncil took note of the statements made and agree d to revert to the matters at its next meeting. 6 NON-VIOLATION AND SI TUATION COMPLAINTS 16. The Chair recalled that the initial mandate to examine the scope and modalities for non -violation and situation complaints, contained in Article 64.3 of the TRIPS Agreement, had required recommendations to be submitted in 1999. On 10 December 2019, the General Council had direct ed the TRIPS Council to continue its work and to make recommendations to the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12). It was also agreed that, in the meantime, Members would not initiate such complaints under the TRIPS Agreement.1 17. He informed delegations that he had held two sets of informal consultations with a small group of the most active Members, on 17 and 31 January 2020. He had asked Members to explore how work could advance on this issue before the next meeting of the TRIPS Council, which was scheduled for 14 -15 May 2020. However, there had not been further progress , even in an informal setting. He highlighted that MC12 was only 4 months away. It was, therefore, important that discussions soon begin to focus on concrete suggestions for the Council's reco mmendation for the Ministerial. As his chairmanship was concluding, he hoped that the incoming chair w ould be able to take up his or her duties very soon after nomination by the General Council, so as to allow for timely and focused work, and he encourage d delegations to support his successor during the challenging period ahead. 18. The representatives of South Africa , on behalf of the African Group ; Bangladesh ; Egypt ; Indonesia ; Nigeria ; Chinese Taipei ; India; China ; Chile; the United States of America ; the Russian Federation ; Switzerland ; Japan ; Canada ; Norway ; the Republic of Korea ; and the Plurinational State of Bolivia took the floor. 19. The Council so took note of the statements made and agreed to revert to the matters at its next meeting . 7 REVIEW OF THE IMPLEM ENTATION OF THE TRIP S AGREEMENT UNDER AR TICLE 71.1 20. The Chair recalled that Article 71.1 required the TRIPS Council to conduct a review once every two years. However, as the Council had not completed its initial review in 1999, no subseq uent review had been initiated since then. Periodic reviews could represent a useful opportunity for Members to share information and experiences in implementing the TRIPS Agreement. 21. The Council agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting. 1 See document WT/L/ 1080. IP/C/M/94 - 6 - 8 REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF TH E SECTION ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICAT IONS UNDER ARTICLE 2 4.2 22. The Chair said that Article 24.2 of the TRIPS Agreement required the Council to keep under review the application of the provisions on geographical indications (GIs). The principal tool used for the review was the Checklist of Questions (IP/C/13 and Add.1). Unfortunately , fewer than 50 Members, out of the 164, had responded to the Checklist so far . Many of the earlier responses were also likely to be outdated and they did not reflect that GI protection was an active area of legal and policy development in some countries, as well as in several FTAs. 23. He encouraged delegations to respond to the Checklist, or to updat e their initial responses. The e-TRIPS Submission System provided an easy and convenient online tool to provide responses to the Checklist and to check the date of delegations’ most recent submission in that regard. I n line with the Council's recommendation of March 2010, he invited Members to share information on bilateral agreements related to the protection of GIs they are party to. 24. The Council agreed to revert to the matter at its next meeting. 9 SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL R EVIEW UNDER PARAGRAP H 2 OF THE DECISION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AR TICLE 66.2 OF THE TR IPS AGREEMENT 25. The Chair recalled that, at its meeting in October 2019, the Council had had on its agenda the 17th Annual Review under Paragraph 2 of the Decision on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agr eement. At that meeting, delegations had briefly presented the updated reports submitted by developed country Members under Article 66.2. Since that meeting New Zealand had submitted its updated report. All updated reports had been circulated under IP/C/W/656 and addenda. At that meeting, the Council had also agreed that it would revert to the item at th e present meeting to permit continued consideration of the submitted material. 26. In order to give LDC Members more time to absorb the information provided by developed countries in their reports, and to ensure that these reports were available in the official languages of the WTO, the Article 66.2 Workshop had once again taken place back-to-back with th e TRIPS Council meeting. This had allowed s ome of the capital -based delegates who had participated in the Workshop , to participate in the meeting and take part in the discussions under this agenda item. 27. The LDC Group has circulated a Room docume nt entitled, "Proposed New Template of annual Reporting on Technology Transfer to LDCs". This room document RD/IP/37 was available on line on documents for meetings, and as a paper copy at the back of the meeting r oom. He noted that the English and French t exts were both contained in the same document. He invited the Secretariat to report on th e Workshop. 28. A representative of the Secretariat took the floor. 29. The Chair invited delegations to comment on the materials submitted for the last meeting, as well as to share their experiences from the Article 66.2 Workshop held in the past two days. 30. The representatives of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group ; Bangladesh ; the United Kingdom ; Switzerland ; the United States of America ; Canada ; the European Union ; Japan ; Norway ; Vanuatu ; Australia ; and the African Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO ) took the floor. 31. The Council took note of the statements made. 10 TECHNICAL COOPERATION AND CAPA CITY -BUILDING 32. The Chair recalled that , at the October 2019 meeting, the Council had conducted its annual review of technical cooperation on the basis of reports submitted by developed country Members, and a number of Observer Internatio nal Organizations. Considering that some information was made available only shortly before the meeting, the Council had agreed that Members would have a further opportunity to make comments at th e present meeting. The International Union for the Protectio n of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) had submitted its report before the meeting, to be circulated as document IP/C/W/654/Add.6. IP/C/M/94 - 7 - 33. The representatives of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group ; and Bangladesh took the floor. 34. The Council took note of the statements made . 11 DRAFT CODEX ALIMENTA RIUS STANDARD - DEFI NITION OF 'CROSS PRO MOTION 35. The Chair indicated that this item had been put on the agenda at the request of Mexico. A communication concerning had been circulated in document IP/C/W/660. He i nvited Mexico to introduce the item. 36. The representative of Mexico took the floor. 37. The representative s of Brazil ; India; and Turkey took the floor. 38. The Council took note of the statements made . 12 INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y AND INNOVATION : 12.1 Summary of the 2019 Theme "Public -private Collaborations in Innovation" 12.2 2020 Theme "Making MSMES Competitive" – February 2020 Subtheme "Making MSMES Competitive Through Trademarks" 39. The Chair said that the item had been put on the agenda at the request of Australia; Canada, Chile; The European Union; Japan; Singapore; Switzerland; the Republic of Korea; the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; and the United States. The item covered two aspects of the broader topic of IP and innovation: (i) "Public -private collaborations in Innovation", a topic that the Council had discussed at its meetings in 2019. A relevant communication had been circulated as document IP/C/W/661 ; and the proposed "2020 Theme: Making MSMEs Competitive". The specific focus at this m eeting was on "Making MSMEs competitive through Trademarks". A relevant communication ha d been circulated as document IP/C/W/662. 40. The representatives of the United States of America ; Canada ; Australia ; Switzerland ; Chinese Taipei ; Japan ; Chile; Singapore ; the Republic of Korea ; the United Kingdom ; China ; Brazil ; India; and Peru took the floor. 41. The Council took note of the statements made. 13 INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y AND THE PUBLIC INT EREST: THE WTO TRIPS AGREEM ENT AND THE COPYRIGHT TH REE-STEP TEST 42. The Chair said that the item had been put on the agenda at the request of South Africa. A communication had been circulated in document IP/C/W/663. He invited South Africa to introduce the item. 43. The representative of South Africa took the floor. 44. The representa tives of India; Chinese Taipei ; Indonesia ; China ; the United States of America ; Switzerland ; and South Africa took the floor . 45. The Council took note of the statements mad e. 14 INFORMATION ON RELEV ANT DEVELOPMENTS ELS EWHERE IN THE WTO 46. The Chair said that the agenda item was for Members' information only and did not require discussion. The purpose was simply to keep Members posted of developments in other WTO bodies which have a TRIPS or intellectual property angle. IP/C/M/94 - 8 - 14.1 TRIPS Amendment 47. The Chair noted that Burundi had deposited its instrument of acceptance on 12 December 2019. To date, 129 Members had accepted the TRIPS amendment. He encouraged the remaining 35 Members to expedite action in good time before the current deadline for acceptance. Un der the General Council Decision of 10 December 2019 (WT/L/1081) the period for acceptance of the Protocol had been extended until 31 December 2021. 14.2 IPR-Related Issues in Trade Polic y Reviews and the Director -General's Monitoring Reports 48. The Chair invited the Secretariat to report on IP-related issues that ha d been considered in the context of individual Members' trade policy reviews. 49. A representative of the Secretariat took the floor. 50. The Council took note of the information provided . 15 OBSERVER STATUS FOR INTERNATI ONAL INTERGOVER NMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS 51. The Chair said that the updated list of pending requests for observer status in the TRIPS Council by intergovernmental organizations was contained in document IP/C/W/52/Rev.14. The information provid ed by the relevant intergovernmental organizations was available on the Members' website.2 52. He recalled that the latest international organization that was granted permanent observer status was the Cooperation Council of the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC), in November 2018. He invited Members and Observers to share their views or developments under this item. 53. The representatives of India; Bangladesh ; Indonesia ; the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela ; China ; and the United States of America and took the floor. 54. The Chair recalled that, at its meeting in November 2012, the Council had agreed to grant ad hoc observer status on a meeting -to-meeting basis to the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). Since then, th e invitation ha d been renewed at each meeting. He suggest ed that EFTA again be invited to attend the Council's next formal meeting on an ad hoc basis. 55. The Council took note of the statements made and agreed to invite EFTA to attend the next meeting on an ad hoc basis 16 OTHER BUSINESS 56. The Chair invited delegations to make statements under this agenda item. 57. The representative of Japan took the floor. 16.1 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce 58. The Chair recalled that , the General Council Decision adopted on 10 December 2019 (WT/L/1079) instructed the General C ouncil to reinvigorate the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, based on the existing Mandate, and report to MC12. The original mandate instructed the General Council to review the work on the basis of reports from the relevant WTO bodies. 59. In the TRIPS C ouncil, there had been no discussion on e-commerce since the meeting in June 2018. At the informal consultations in January 2020, no delegation had indicated any intention to propose e-commerce discussions in the TRIPS Council, at this time. He would there fore remind delegations of the mandate under the original Ministerial Decision on e-commerce and invite them to share any thoughts on how to pursue this mandate. If he was requested to provide an update on 2 Available at https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/xtrips_e/igo_observer_e.htm . IP/C/M/94 - 9 - the TRIPS Council's work, he would report this sta te of play to the General Council during its review of the Work Programme. 16.2 Dates of Next Meeting 60. The Chair invited the Secretariat to brief delegations on the schedule of meetings for 2020 61. A representative of the Secretariat took the floor. 62. The representa tive of Bangladesh took the floor. 63. The Council took note of the statements made. 17 ELECTION OF THE CHAI RPERSON 64. The Chair indicated that the Council's rules of procedure provided that "[t]he election shall take place at the first meeting of the year and shall take effect at the end of the meeting", and that "[t]he Chairperson […] shall hold office until the end of the first meeting of the following year". 65. The General Council's meeting to agree on the slate of chairpersons for WTO bodies was scheduled to take place on 3 -4 March 2020. The TRIPS Council would, therefore, not be able to elect its Chair at the present meeting. 66. The Chair suggested that, to avoid having an additional meeting of the TRIPS Council in March just for the purpose of formalizing the election of the Chair, the Council follow its earlier practice in similar situations, and proceed as follows: (i) the TRIPS Council would formally elect its new Chair at the beginning of its meeting scheduled for 14 -15 May 2020; and (ii) in the meantime, as soon as the General Council agrees on the slate of chairpersons, the TRIPS Council Chair -designate would take up his or h er role as the Chair, including holding any consultations in preparation of the Council's May meeting, pending his or her formal election at that meeting. 67. The Council so agreed . 68. The Chair thanked delegations for their trust and cooperation during his term as TRIPS Chair. He encouraged delegations to continue support ing the efforts of his successor , particularly, in preparation of any recommendations on TRIPS non -violation for the Ministerial Conference in June. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_DS_464-17A24.pdf

q_WT_DS_464-17A24

WT/DS464/17/Add.24 6 December 2019 (19-8416) Page: 1/1 Original: English UNITED STATES – ANTI -DUMPING AND COUNTER VAILING MEASURES ON LARGE RESIDENTIAL WASHERS FROM KOREA STATUS REPORT REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DSB RECOMMENDATIONS AND RULINGS BY THE UNITED STATES Addendum The following communication, dated 5 December 2019 , from the delegation of the United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.6 of the DSU. _______________ The United States submits this report in accordance with Article 21.6 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU"). On September 26, 2016, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") adopted its recommendations in United States – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Large Residential Washe rs from Korea (WT/DS464). At the following DSB meeting, on October 26, 2016, the United States informed the DSB of its intention to implement the recommendations of the DSB in connection with this matter. Korea requested that the reasonable period of time for the United States to implement the recommendations of the DSB be determined through arbitration pursuant to Article 21.3(c) of the DSU. The Arbitrator determined the reasonable period of time to be 15 months, expiring on December 26, 2017. On May 6, 2 019, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a notice in the U.S. Federal Register announcing the revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on imports of large residential washers from Korea (84 Fed. Reg. 19,763 (May 6, 2019)). With th is action, the United States has completed implementation of the DSB recommendations concerning those antidumping and countervailing duty orders. The United States continues to consult with interested parties on options to address the recommendations of the DSB relating to other measures challenged in this dispute. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_ECU436.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_ECU436

G/TBT/N/ECU/436 17 de mayo de 2019 (19-3443) Página: 1/3 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN Se da traslado de la notificación siguiente de conformidad con el artículo 10.6. 1. Miembro que notifica: ECUADOR Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate (artículos 3.2 y 7.2): 2. Organismo responsable: Servicio Ecuatoriano de Normalización INEN Calle Baquerizo Moreno E8 -29 y Diego de Almagro Teléfono: (+593 -2) 3825960 al 90 Página WEB: www.normalizacion.gob.ec Nombre y dirección (incluidos los números de teléfono y de fax, así como las direcciones de correo electrónico y sitios web, en su caso) del organismo o autoridad encargado de la tramitación de observaciones sobre la notificación, en caso de que se trate de un organismo o autoridad diferente: Subsecretaría de Calidad Ministerio de Producción, Comercio, Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca (MPCEIP) Dirección: Av. Amazonas entre Unión Nacional de Periodistas y Alfonso Pereira, Piso 8, Bloque amarillo Teléfono: (+593 2) 3948760 Ext. 2254 - 2272 Correo electrónico: puntocontactoOTCECU@produccion.gob.ec ; puntocontactoOTCECU@gmail.com ; aramon@produccion.gob.ec ; cyepez@produccion.gob.ec ; jsanchez@produccion.gob.ec Página WEB: www.industrias.gob.ec 3. Notificación hecha en virtud del artículo 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], o en virtud de : 4. Productos abarcados (partida del SA o de la NCCA cuando correspon da; en otro caso partida del arancel nacional. Podrá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): Válvulas de alivio o seguridad (HS 848140); Los demás artículos de grifería y órganos similares (HS 848180) 5. Título, número de páginas e idioma(s) del documento notificado: Proyecto de Primera Revisión del Reglamento Técnico Ecuatoriano PRTE INEN 235 (1R) "Válvulas de seguridad " (10 página(s), en Español) 6. Descripción del contenido: Este reglamento técnico ecuatoriano establece los requisitos que deben cumplir las válvulas de seguridad, previamente a la comercialización de productos nacionales e importados, con el propósito de proteger la seguridad de las personas, así como evitar prácticas que puedan inducir a error. Este reglamento técnico se aplica a los productos: • Válvulas de seguridad con y sin pilotaje. • Válvulas de seguridad con independencia del fluido para el cual han sido diseñadas. G/TBT/N/ECU/436 - 2 - • Válvulas de seguridad con un diámetro de paso de fluido superior o igual a 6mm que s e utilizan para presiones de regulación de 0,01 MPa (0,1 bar manométricos) y superiores. No hay ninguna limitación de temperatura. Este reglamento técnico no aplica a: • Válvulas desaireadoras y válvulas reguladoras de presión utilizadas con Gas Licuado de P etróleo (GLP) y otros gases comprimidos inflamables. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser, incluida, cuando proceda, la naturaleza de los problemas urgentes: Información al consumidor, Etiquetado; Prevención de prácticas que puedan inducir a error y protección del consumidor; Protección de la salud o seguridad humanas 8. Documentos pertinentes: REFERENCIAS NORMATIVAS: 1. Norma ISO 2859 -1:1999+Amd 1:2011, Procedimientos de muestreo para inspección poratributos. Parte 1. Programas de muestreo clasificados por el nivel aceptable de calidad (AQL)para inspección lote a lote. 2. Norma ISO 21013 -1:2008, Accesorios de alivio de presión para servicio criogénico - Parte 1: Válvulas de alivio de presión con cierre hermético. 3. Norma ISO 4126 -1:2017, Dispositivos de seguridad para la protección contra la presión excesiva – Parte 1: Válvulas de Seguridad (ISO 4126 -1:2013 + Amd.1:2016, IDT). 4. Norma ISO 4126 -4:2017, Dispositivos de seguridad para la protección contra la presión excesiva – Parte 4: Válvulas de Seguridad pilotadas (ISO 4126 -4:2013, IDT). 5. Norma ISO/IEC 17025:2006, Requisitos generales para la competencia de laboratorios de calibración y ensayo. 6. Norma ISO/IEC 17050 -1:2004, Evaluación de la conformidad – Declaración de la conformidad del proveedor. Parte 1. Requisitos generales. 7. Norma ISO/IEC 17067:2014, Evaluación de la conformidad. Fundamentos de certificación de productos y directrices aplicables a los esquemas de certificación de producto. 8. Norma EN 13648 -1:2009, Recipientes criogénicos. Dispositivos de seguridad para la prote cción contra la presión excesiva. Parte 1: Válvulas de seguridad para el servicio criogénico. 9. Norma API 526, Válvulas de alivio de presión de acero con bridas (Septiembre 2017). 10. Norma ASME B134:2017, Válvulas. Bridadas, roscadas y para soldadura en extremo. 11. Código ASME para Calderas y Recipientes a Presión Sección VIII: Reglas para la Construcción de Recipientes a Presión División I: 2013. TRAZABILIDAD: 1. G/TBT/N/ECU/264 2. G/TBT/N/ECU/264/Add.1 3. G/TBT/N/ECU/264/Add.2 9. Fecha propuesta de adopción: Desde 60 días a partir de la notificación Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor: 180 días a partir de la fecha de adopción 10. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones: 60 días desde la notificación G/TBT/N/ECU/436 - 3 - 11. Textos disponibles en: Servicio nacional de información [X] , o direcció n, números de teléfono y de fax y direcciones de correo electrónico y sitio s web, en su caso, de otra institución: Punto de Contacto y/o Centro de Información Nacional: Subsecretaría de Calidad Ministerio de Producción, Comercio, Exterior, Inversiones y Pesca (MPCEIP) Dirección: Av. Amazonas entre Unión Nacional de Periodistas y Alfonso Pereira, Piso 8, Bloque amarillo Teléfono: (+593 2) 3948760 Ext. 2254 - 2272 Correo electrónico: puntocontactoOTCECU@produccion.gob.ec ; puntocontactoOTCECU@gmail.com ; aramon@produccion.gob.ec ; cyepez@produccion.gob.ec ; jsanchez@produccion.gob.ec www.normalizacion.gob.ec https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/TBT/ECU/19_2916_00_s.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN07_BRA256A1C3.pdf

s_G_TBTN07_BRA256A1C3

G/TBT/N/BRA/256/Add.1/Corr.3 15 de agosto de 2023 (23-5500) Página: 1/1 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Corrigendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 11 de agosto de 2023 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación del Brasil . _______________ Consolidation of conformity assessment requirements for ceiling Fans (Consolidación de los requisitos de evaluación de la conformidad de los ventiladores de techo) Se rectifica la Orden Nº 465 del INMETRO, de 23 de noviembre de 2021 , publicada en el Diario Oficial de 25 de noviembre de 2021 , sección 1, páginas 37 a 40, por la que se consolidan los requisitos de evaluación de la conformidad de los ventiladores de techo. El texto rectificado está disponible solamente en portugués y puede descargarse del siguiente enlace: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/ -/retificacao -501819278 __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN18_USA1367R1.pdf

r_G_TBTN18_USA1367R1

G/TBT/N/USA/1367/Rev.1 15 septembre 2022 (22-6821) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION Révision La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMÉRIQUE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement - BSEE (Bureau de la sécurité et de l'environnement), Department of Interior (Département de l'intérieur) (DOI) Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des observations concernant la notification doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: Les observations sont à envoyer à : USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point (Point d'information OTC pour l'OMC des États -Unis d'Amérique) . Courrier électronique: usatbtep@nist.gov 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [X], 5.7.1 [ ], 3.2 [ ], 7.2 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, sinon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être i ndiqués, le cas échéant) : Systèmes d'obturation anti -éruption ; qualité ( ICS 03.120) ; protection de l'environnement ( ICS 13.020) Équipement pour les industries du pétrole et du gaz naturel (ICS 75.180) Équipement de transport des produits pétroliers et du g az naturel (ICS 75.200) 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du texte notifié : Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf - Blowout Preventer Systems and Well Control Revisions (Activités liées au pétrole, au gaz et au soufre da ns la zone externe du plateau continental - Révisions concernant les systèmes d'obturation anti -éruption et l'équipement de contrôle de puits), 12 pages, en anglais 6. Teneur : Proposition de règle - Le Département de l 'intérieur (DOI ou Département), par l'intermédiaire du Bureau de la sécurité et de l'environnement (BSEE), propose de réviser certaines dispositions réglementaires publiées dans la règle finale de 2019 relative au contrôle de puits en ce qui concerne les opérations de forag e et les travaux de conditionnement, de reconditionnement et de déclassement de puits . Le BSEE propose ces révisions afin de clarifier les prescriptions relatives aux systèmes d 'obturation anti - éruption et de modifier certaines prescriptions relatives aux capacités de s équipements de ces systèmes . Cette proposition de règle garantirait la cohérence et la clarté pour la branche de production concernant les prescriptions relatives aux équipements des systèmes d 'obturation anti -éruption et les prescriptions op érationnelles connexes G/TBT/N/USA/1367/Rev.1 - 2 - nécessaires pour examen et approbation par le BSEE et permettrait en outre de garantir que les opérations sont menées d 'une manière sure et respectueuse de l 'environnement. 7. Objectif et justification, y compris la nature des probl èmes urgents, le cas échéant : Protection de la santé ou de la sécurité des personnes ; protection de l'environnement ; exigences en matière de qualité 8. Documents pertinents : 87 Federal Register (FR) 56354, 1 4 septembre 2022; Titre 30 du Code des règlements fédéraux (CFR) Partie 250: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -2022-09-14/html/2022 -19462.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR -2022-09-14/pdf/2022 -19462.pdf La proposition de réglementation notifiée porte le numéro de dossier de consultation (docket ) BSEE -2022-0009. Le dossier relatif à ce projet de règlement est disponible sur le site Regulations.gov à l'adresse suivante: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/BSEE - 2022-0009/document et permet d'accéder aux documents principaux et aux documents justificatifs, ainsi qu'aux observations reçues . Les documents sont également disponibles sur le site Regulations.gov en effectuant une recherche par numéro de dossier ( docket ). Les Membres de l'OMC et leurs parties prenantes sont priés de présenter leurs observations au point d'information OTC des États-Unis d'ici au 1 4 novembre 2022 à 16 heures , heure de l'Est . Les observations reçues par le point d'info rmation OTC des États-Unis de la part des Membres de l'OMC et de leurs parties prenantes seront transmises à l'organisme de réglementation et seront aussi versées au dossier sur Regulations.gov si elles sont reçues pendant le délai prévu pour la présentation des observations. Les précédentes actions notifiées sous la cote G/TBT/N/USA/1367 portent le numéro de dossier ( docket ) BSEE -2018-0002. Le dossier relatif à ce projet de règlement est disponible sur le site Regulations.gov à l'adresse suivante: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/BSEE -2018-0002/document et permet d'ac céder aux documents principaux et aux documents justificatifs, ainsi qu'aux observations reçues . Les documents sont également disponibles sur le site Regulations.gov en effectuant une recherche par numéro de doss ier (docket ). 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : à déterminer Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : à déterminer 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : 14 novembre 2022 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les textes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [ ] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2022/TBT/USA/22_6180_00_e.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_GC_M192.pdf

q_WT_GC_M192

RESTRICTED WT/GC/M/192 4 October 2021 (21-7454) Page: 1/229 General Council 27-28 July 2021 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD IN VIRTUAL FORMAT ON 27-28 JULY 2021 Chairperson: H.E. Mr. Dacio Castillo (Honduras) The Chairman bade farewell to H.E. Mr. Mārtiņš Kreitus (Latvia), H.E. Mr. Syamsul Bahri Siregar (Indonesia), H.E. Mr. Daniiar Mukashev (Kyrgyz Republic), H.E. Ms. Monique Van Daalen (The Netherlands), H.E. Mr. Thay Bunthon (Cambodia) and H.E. Mr. Yurii Klymenko (Ukraine) and expressed appreciation for their valuable contribution during their time as Permanent Representatives. Subjects discussed1: 1 REPORT BY THE CHAIR OF THE TRADE NEGOTIATIONS COMMITTEE AND REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR -GENERAL ................................ ................................ ............................ 3 2 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BALI, NAIROBI AND BUENOS AIRES OUTCOMES – STATEMENT BY THE CHAIRMAN ................................ ................................ ....................... 7 3 WORK PROGRAMME ON SMALL ECONOMIES – REPORT BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE DEDICATED SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT .................... 12 4 TRIPS COUNCIL MATTERS ................................ ................................ ......................... 15 4.1 Status Report on the Considerations by the TRIPS Council on the "Proposal for a Waiver from Certain Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID -19" – Statement by the Chair of the Council for TRIPS .............................. 15 5 WORK PROGRAMME ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE – REPORT BY THE CHAIR .............. 33 6 WORK PROGRAMME ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND MORATORIUM ON IMPOSING CUSTOMS DUTIES ON ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSIONS – REQUEST FROM INDIA AND SOUTH AFRICA ................................ ................................ .................. 35 7 PREPARATIONS FOR THE TWELFTH SESSION OF THE MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE – STATEMENT BY THE CHAIR ................................ ................................ .... 48 7.1 WTO Response to the Pandemic – Report by the Facilitator ................................ .............. 50 8 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MULTILATERAL PROCESS ON THE WTO RESPONSE TO THE PANDEMIC ................................ ................................ ............... 53 8.1 Draft General Council Declaration – COVID -19 and Beyond: Trade and Health – Communication from Australia; Brazil; Brunei Darussalam; Canada; Chile; China; the European Union; Hong Kon g, China; Iceland; Japan; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Republic of Korea; Mexico; Republic of Moldova; Montenegro; New Zealand; North Macedonia; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland; the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; the United Kingdom; Uruguay and Vanuatu ................................ ................................ ........... 53 8.2 Urgent Trade Policy Responses to the COVID -19 Crisis – Communication from the European Union to the WTO General Council ................................ ................................ ...54 1 The proposed agenda was circulated in document WT/GC/W/824. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 2 - 8.3 Ministerial Declaration on Combating, Mitigating and Recovering from the Impacts of COVID -19 and Beyond – Communication from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu ................................ ................................ ................................ 55 9 SAUDI ARABIA'S RESTRICTIVE POLICIES ON POULTRY IMPORTS – REQUEST FROM BRAZIL ................................ ................................ ................................ . 74 10 TRADE RELATED CHALLENGES OF THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AND WAY FORWARD: A DRAFT FOR MC DECISION ................................ ................................ 75 11 PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR WTO COUNCILS AND COMMITTEES ADDRESSING TRADE CONCERNS – COMMUNICATION FROM ALBANIA; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHINA; EUROPEAN UNION; HONG KONG, CHINA; ICELAND; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH MACEDON IA; NORWAY; PANAMA; QATAR; SINGAPORE; SWITZERLAND; THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU; THAILAND; TURKEY; AND UKRAINE ............................. 81 12 SUPPORTING THE CONCLUSION OF FISHERIES SUBSIDIES NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE OCEAN AND FISHING COMMUNITIES – DRAFT MINISTERIAL DECISION – COMMUNICATION FROM BRAZIL ................................ ......... 85 13 G90 DECLARATION ON SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT – COMMUNICATION FROM SOUTH AFRICA ON BEHALF OF THE G90 ................................ . 91 14 PAPER TITLED "THE LEGAL STATUS OF 'JOINT STATEMENT INITIATIVES' AND THEIR NEGOTIATED OUTCOMES" – REQUEST FROM INDIA AND SOUTH AFRICA .. 104 15 PROPOSED GENERAL COUNCIL DECISION ON PROCEDURES TO ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY AND STRENGTHEN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER WTO AGREEMENTS – ARGENTINA ; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHILE; COSTA RICA; THE EUROPEAN UNION; ISRAEL; JAPAN; NEW ZEALAND; NORWAY; SINGAPORE; SWITZERLAND; THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU; UNITED KINGDOM; AND THE UNITED STATES ........................... 115 16 JOINT COMMUNICATION ON SYSTEMIC ISSUES – STATEMENT BY SWITZERLAND ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 125 17 STRENGTHENING THE MULTILATERAL CHARACTER OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION – REQUEST FROM THE AFRICAN GROUP ................................ ............. 131 18 WAIVERS UNDER ARTICLE IX OF THE WTO AGREEMENT ................................ ....... 139 18.1 European Union – Application of Autonomous Preferential Treatment to the Western Balkans – Extension of Waiver – Draft Decision ................................ ................ 139 18.2 Review of Waivers Pursuant to Article IX:4 of the WTO Agreement ............................... 139 18.2.1 Least -Developed Cou ntry Members – Obligations under Article 70.8 and Article 70.9 of the TRIPS Agreement with respect to Pharmaceutical Products, granted on 30 November 2015 until 1 January 2033 ................................ ............................ 139 18.2.2 Kimberley Process Certification Scheme for Rough Diamonds, granted on 26 July 2018 through 31 December 2024 ................................ ........................... 139 18.2.3 Canada – CARIBCAN, granted on 28 July 2015 until 31 December 2023 ..................... 139 19 COMMITTEE ON BUDGET, FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION – REPORTS ON THE MEETINGS OF APRIL, MAY, JUNE AND JULY 2021 ................................ ........................ 140 20 WTO PENSION PLAN ................................ ................................ ............................. 142 20.1 Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ending 31 December 2020 ............ 142 20.2 Report of the Independent External Auditor on the Audit of the Financial Statements of the World Trade Organization Pension Plan ( WTOPP) for the Year Ended 31 December 2020 ..... 142 21 CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT – AUSTRALIA; CANADA; THE EUROPEAN UNION; JAPAN; NEW ZEALAND; THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU; UNITED KINGDOM; AND THE UNITED STATES ................................ .............................. 143 WT/GC/M/19 2 - 3 - 22 APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS TO THE SUBSIDIARY BODIES OF THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS – REPORT BY THE CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 146 23 OTHER BUSINESS ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 149 ANNEX 1 – STATEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR -GENERAL, THE CHAIR OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL AND THE CHAIRS OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUPS AT THE INFORMAL TNC AND INFORMAL HODS MEETINGS HELD ON 23 JULY 2021 ................................ ........... 151 ANNEX 2 – STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS AT THE INFORMAL TNC AND INFORMAL HODS MEETINGS HELD ON 23 JULY 2021 ................................ ................... 170 ANNEX 3 – STATEMENTS JAMAICA (ACP GROUP) AND CHAD (LDC GROUP) AT THE E -COMMERCE STRUCTURED DISCUSSIONS HELD ON 5 JULY 2021 ................... 222 ANNEX 4 – STATEMENTS AT THE INFORMAL MEETING OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL ON 28 JULY 2021 ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 225 1 REPORT BY THE CHAIR OF THE TRADE NEGOTIATIONS COMMITTEE AND REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR -GENERAL 1.1. The Chair recalled that an Informal TNC meeting and Informal Heads of Delegation had been convened by the Director -General on Friday, 23 July . He invite d the Directo r-General, as Chair of the TNC, to report on th at meeting. 1.2. The Director -General provided the following statement2: 1.3. Since the General Council in May, the TNC has held three meetings on 25 June, 15 July3, and 23 July. My statements in these meetings have been circulated in documents JOB/TNC/93 to 96. 1.4. At the 25 June informal session, Members discussed the modalities for the 15 July Ministerial Meeting and had a focused discussion on where they stood on some of the possible deliverables for MC12 including the WTO's response to the pandemic, agriculture, dispute settlement and other issues they raised. 65 interventions were made throughout the meeting. 1.5. On 15 July, I convened a virtual Formal Session of the TN C at Ministerial Level on Fisheries Subsidies. It was the first of its kind in the WTO's history with 104 Ministers and Heads of Delegation, representing 128 Members and 1 Observer, participating in the discussions. 1.6. Factoring in statements by group coordi nators, nearly all Members were represented in these statements. This is a record for the TNC, attesting to Members' commitment to the multilateral trading system, and the high importance attached to successfully concluding the fisheries subsidies negotiat ions. And I want to sincerely thank all of you and your Ministers and Heads of Delegation for this commitment. 1.7. I know that it was not easy doing it virtually, but we managed to pull it off. 1.8. Last Friday, 23 July, I organized another informal session to ta ke stock of our work across the broad spectrum of issues that Members have been working on and to discuss the next steps from September as we draw closer to MC12. 1.9. We heard reports from the Chairs facilitating Members' efforts on Fisheries Subsidies, Agriculture, Services, Special and Differential Treatment and the DSU negotiations. A total of 50 interventions were made with delegations sharing their views on the way forward. 1.10. From what I have gathered from these discussions: Members see MC12 as an important milestone to deliver meaningful outcomes. However, gaps in all negotiating areas and ambition 2 The Director -General's statement was also circulated in JOB/GC/265. 3 The Minutes of the 41st Formal Session of Trade Negotiations Committee – the Virtual TNC Meeting at the Ministerial Level on Fisheries Subsidies – was circulated in document TN/C/M/41. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 4 - levels differ – be it in agriculture, in fisheries subsidies, in S&DT or even the WTO's Pandemic Response. They are important gaps. 1.11. In spite of this, a lot of h ard work has been put in by Members and Negotiating Group Chairs to move issues forward. There is a willingness to work together to have a successful MC12. I therefore highly commend all delegations and Chairs for this, particularly during the intense processes over the past weeks and days. I don't know about you - we have had so many meetings, so many consultations that finally one is beginning to feel the impact of that. I want to commend all of you because I know that many of you have other responsibilit ies to other institutions, not only the WTO - so well done. 1.12. Work continues this week – for example the CoA -SS will continue its meeting today and after the General Council on the 29th. I would like to pay tribute to Members and the Chair –Ambassador Gloria Peralta for her leadership and to thank the Agriculture Secretariat team and the delivery unit for supporting her. 1.13. As I said on Friday, while agriculture is a tough issue, and we have a long way to go – the good news is that everybody wants a package. I believe we can come up with something credible for MC12 as the will exists, but the ambition levels are quite different, as we know. We therefore have some work ahead and I look forward to the Chair's draft text this week under her own responsibility. 1.14. On fisheries subsidies, while important concerns remain to be addressed, Members have remained constructively engaged and I have sensed a genuine willingness to move forward. I sincerely thank all delegations and Ambassador Santiago Wills for this. We rece ived political guidance from Ministers and Heads of Delegation to conclude the fisheries subsidies negotiations soon. Again, that does not mean that we do not take cognisance of the views of Members regarding what needs to be done with the existing text. 1.15. Last Friday Santiago outlined a two -stage process aimed at addressing the "Macro -issues" and the perceived imbalances in the text and then embarking on a more detailed line -by-line negotiation to get us to the finish line for a quality and meaningful outco me. I really want to thank him for coming up with this approach which will enable Members to engage, hopefully, substantially all along the process. He is currently further refining the proposed work plan through his outreach to delegations this week – and I look forward to its circulation. I understand that Ambassador Wills will circulate the workplan this week. 1.16. On Friday, I heard the call of some delegations for the release of the minutes of the Ministerial TNC on Fisheries Subsidies along with statements of Ministers. I just want to confirm that the Secretariat is finalizing the record which should be available by the end of the week. 1.17. Discussions are also ongoing on the Concept Note for a WTO Funding Mechanism in fisheries subsidies, and I heard loud and clear the discomfort expressed by some delegations, which I said we will address one -by-one. 1.18. However, let me re -emphasize what I said on Friday. The Funding Mechanism is in no way meant to prejudge the fisheries subsidies negotiations outcome nor be a su bstitute for structural issues. This capacity support is not intended to be forced on anyone. It is meant for only those who want to use it and will be demand driven. The idea of starting early is to be prepared in case it is needed after the negotiations are completed. As a former Finance Minister, I am mindful of budget cycles and we need to get in early with some countries so that they can integrate it into their budget cycle. I will continue my outreach efforts on this in the coming weeks. 1.19. Another impor tant issue which has been raised is dispute settlement – where at a minimum, a common understanding on the needed reforms is what many are seeking for MC12. I think this is an appropriate level of ambition for this issue. Everyone heard what was said on Fr iday and I believe the GC Chair will provide a report on his consultations on this under Agenda Item 7. 1.20. WTO Reform is another area with a clear desire by Members for engagement, and the idea of a Working Group is welcomed. However, from what I have heard i n my meetings and outreach to different groups of Members, views on what constitutes WTO Reform differ. And I shared this at the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 5 - TNC. Therefore, let me repeat a little bit what I said, which is that Members need first of all to come to a common understandi ng of what is meant by WTO reform before embarking on it. I look forward to the GC Chair's report on this also under Agenda item 7. 1.21. Finally, the WTO's Pandemic Response, where there is unanimous support from Members that the WTO should address this urgentl y – not only for now, but for the future. Lives are at stake. As Ambassador Parola said on Friday, it would be embarrassing if we did not have a credible outcome here. And I believe that we have the essential ingredients before us to deliver something cred ible soon – the world is expecting it from us. 1.22. So, let me again commend the GC Chair for the horizontal multilateral process he has initiated, and I look forward to hearing Ambassador Walker's report and the presentation of communications from Members under Agenda Items 7 and 8. Let me again thank and commend Ambassador Spencer and Tan for the work they have done on this which has been integrated into Ambassador Walker's own work. 1.23. I think we also have to step back and give ourselves a little pat on the back. Sometimes we are very hard on ourselves. In the past four months, the WTO has achieved a lot. It has been placed squarely at the heart of the solution to the Pandemic. We have strengthened our ties with other international organizations, and we have reached out to the private sector including manufa cturers. So, let's take further concrete steps and deliver a collective and credible outcome for the people we are here to serve by MC12. 1.24. In terms of the way forward, the Chairs facilitating Members' discussions have laid out plans for work in various con figurations from September to MC12 – which we heard on Friday. And we will hear more when they release more information on the workplan. 1.25. Delegations are also actively reaching out to each other albeit mostly to coordinate like - minded positions. That is wh y I have continued to urge you all to reach out to those on the other side – if we are going to deliver meaningful outcomes in the short time left. And I thank you for the efforts you have been making already. 1.26. Chair, a lot of hard work has taken place ove r the nearly five months since I took office as Director -General and Chair of the TNC. Credit is due to all delegations – both at the HoDs and experts level for their constructive engagement. Special thanks go to all the Chairs, facilitators and the Secret ariat teams who have worked very hard to assist Members. 1.27. It is the end of July and much remains to be done. We certainly have a tough road ahead of us. 1.28. Although there are a lot of obstacles on our way, I remain hopeful that everyone is willing to put in the effort for us to deliver high quality results. As I said on Friday, we will continue to reach out with optimism and with smiles. But for us to do that quickly and arrive at mutually agreeable solutions, we need to start building convergence and reachin g out to delegations on the other side of the aisle. 1.29. If we are to achieve anything meaningful, we need to focus on a limited number of issues for delivery before or by MC12 – three or four at the maximum and intensify processes from 1 September as laid ou t by the Chairs or Facilitators. 1.30. Given where we are today – from what I have heard in the past months and last week – intensifying efforts on some areas such as Fisheries Subsidies, Agriculture, the WTO's Response to the Pandemic, WTO reform and dispute s ettlement – seems reasonable and could take us within the realm of what could be possible for delivery. If we deliver successfully on even two of these - that would be a major outcome for the organization. 1.31. There are other critical areas such as S&DT – a central tenet of the WTO which we must also aim to work hard on. While cognisant of the difficulties involved, I really urge all Members to remain engaged with the Chair and the G90 to see how practically we can move forward the specific proposals that have been put on the table. Members may also have to address this issue in a broader way down the line. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 6 - 1.32. In addition, other equally important areas of interest to membership are there and work is ongoing either multilaterally or amongst groups. On some of these , converging on a strong, credible political commitment – including by defining meaningful work programmes or work calendars to conclude and continue work – post MC12, might be the most pragmatic route. 1.33. In a Member -driven organization – the ball is in your court. But as Director -General and TNC Chair, you have also entrusted me with the responsibility of facilitating your efforts – together with the Chairs – to deliver credible and meaningful results for the people we are here to serve. 1.34. Chair, before I con clude my report, I would like to ask your indulgence and use this opportunity to update Members on the WTO Secretariat Structural Review. We just got in some results, and I know this is the only opportunity I will have to share what we have before we go so please, if you permit me. 1.35. Delegations will recall that I mentioned this issue at our meeting on 25 June and sent you a short note on the way that McKinsey – who was chosen to undertake the review – was looking to consult with you. I would like to thank a ll Members who participated and contributed to the process. I understand that it went quite well and there were focus groups of almost 20 Members at a time. Over 60 Members participated in these sessions. 1.36. Insights from the Member Consultation sessions wer e used to complement the findings from other sources such as staff surveys – again we had very good luck with the staff survey, with a 50%+ response rate – which McKinsey tells me that in their experience was quite high. It is normally 30 – 40% so our staf f really engaged in the process. 1.37. Along the different Member consultation sessions, the areas of strength that were identified included that the WTO Secretariat was clearly perceived to have highly capable staff with deep content knowledge and expertise, d riven by the purpose of the WTO and by the desire to serve its Members. In addition, a second area of strength was that staff felt comfortable in the ecosystem in which they were working. They found their ecosystem to be favourable and this may be because the Secretariat has made progress in recent years in strengthening its procedures and infrastructure working more efficiently than before, but more remains to be done. 1.38. However, a few recurring improvement areas were identified: First, lack of clarity abou t the strategic direction and priorities of the Secretariat, with a large majority of Members confirming that there is potential for the Secretariat to amplify the WTO's overall impact by having a clearer vision and strategic priorities; 1.39. Second, regarding the organizational structure, it is perceived there should be more cross divisional collaboration when working on horizontal topics, instead of working in siloes which creates uncoordinated meetings and answers; 1.40. Third, some Members highlighted that they fe el the workload across teams and Divisions is distributed in an unequal way and that due to rigid structures no dynamic allocation of staff is possible; 1.41. Fourth, processes are not always perceived to be streamlined or run in the most efficient way, despite some improvements. With some perception of duplicated activities, and not knowing whom to engage on cross -cutting topics. In addition, Members mentioned that the communication process could be strengthened (communication with Members and other senior manag ement as well as external communication relating to meeting outcomes) and that in some cases there was a lack of follow up or integration of Members' inputs; 1.42. Last, on technology some Members mentioned the potential to improve how information is made availa ble – e.g., the need to use multiple different systems to get information. 1.43. So, some weaknesses that have come up when you integrate all the information that has been put together. I will just go quickly through as we don't have time. They are as follows: Lack of a strategic direction; Ineffective structure and siloed ways of work ing; Rigid resource allocation; Weak approaches to talent management; processes, recruitment and promotion; Inefficient operational processes; Some disconnect between staff and management with respect to the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 7 - effectiveness of the organization; Not leveragin g data and technology to full potential, and; Lack of outward looking orientation and innovative culture. 1.44. In terms of next steps –based on these findings we will develop an action plan and initiatives for implementation aimed at serving you – the membershi p better. And at strengthening for the staff the motivation to work in the organization and deliver better. 1.45. In closing my report under this agenda item, I would like to echo the GC Chair's call last week to all delegations to please come back in early Sep tember with a solutions -oriented mindset and the energy to constructively engage in the intensified processes ahead to ensure that we can deliver meaningful results before and at MC12. 1.46. I have urged you often to find flexibilities and compromise within your own national positions, which will be necessary to get to 'yes' in the months after the break. In this regard, I was so inspired by the Robert Burns lines that Ambassador Manley quoted on Friday that I looked them up over the weekend. As some of you may k now, I like reading poetry – one of my sons is a poet. I was surprised to learn that the poem was actually about resisting and defeating an English invasion! The good news is that the concessions we need to deliver results this year are vastly more modest than defeating the British. So, I want to echo Ambassador Manley, and Burns, by urging you to come back on September 1 with this in mind: "Now is the day, now is the hour!" 1.47. The Chair thanked the Director -General for her report, and for her tireless engagement, efforts, and collaboration. He did not expect a long discussion under this item and noted that statements made at the TNC meeting of 23 July would be reflected in the minutes of this General Council meeting.4 1.48. The General Council took note of the report of the Director -General. 2 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BALI, NAIROBI AND BUENOS AIRES OUTCOMES – STATEMENT BY THE CHAIRMAN 2.1. The Chair recalled5 that the item remain ed on the agenda so that the General Council c ould continue to follow up, in a horizontal and transparent manner, on the Ministerial decisions adopted in Bali, Nairobi and Buenos Aires . His report that day was based on the information provided by the Chairs of the regular bodies on the implementation work taking place further to Ministerial mandates in their respective areas. For some issues, including the Work Programme on Small Economies and the Work Programme on Ecommerce , there would be separate items lat er in the agenda. 2.2. Regarding TRIPS non -violation and situation complaints, he understood that there ha d been no new substantive developments to date. Members ha d largely reiterated their known positions regarding the applicability of NVCs in TRIPS, and the Chair would continue to seek engagement from Members ahead of the next TRIPS Council meeting. 2.3. There were a few matters to report in the area of Agriculture. In particular, concerning the Ministerial Decision on Public Stockholding for Food Security Purpose s, the Committee on Agriculture had reviewed notifications by a Member invoking the Decision for the breach of the de minimis limit for rice for the marketing years 2018/19 and 2019/20, including at its latest meeting in June. 2.4. As regards the follow -up to t he Bali TRQ Decision, Members ha d been engaged to find a solution to the outstanding issue of the future operation of paragraph 4 of the underfill mechanism within the agreed deadline of December 2021. The Chair of the Committee on Agriculture ha d held consultations on this issue in various formats, and Members ha d put forward some concrete textual suggestions. 2.5. Regarding the implementation of the Nairobi Decision on Export Competition, the Committee on Agriculture had continued its deliberations on the seco nd triennial review of the Decision at its 4 The Director -General's report and the reports of the Chairs of Negotiating Bodies at the 23 July Informal TNC and Informal HODs Meeting were circulated in document JOB/TNC/96. At his request, the report of the Chair of the CTE SS was subsequently circulated in document TN/TE/25 . They are reproduced in Annex I to this document. 5 The Chair's statement was circulated in document JOB/GC/266. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 8 - June meeting. The Secretariat had circulated few days ago the background document that w ould serve as a basis for the next dedicated discussion on export competition planned during the September 2021 CoA meeting. 2.6. Turning to the LDC Services Waiver, following an initial proposal by the LDC Group, the Council for Trade in Services had held a webinar on "Least Developed Country services export performance and facilitating implementation of preferences notified under t he LDC Services Waiver". At the subsequent meeting of the Council, Members had shared their reflections on the event. 2.7. All delegations who intervened had expressed appreciation for the webinar. Many had noted that the event had illustrated the opportunities and challenges faced by LDC suppliers in participating in global services trade, while also highlighting the significant gaps in LDC services trade data. The LDC Group had put forward a number of sugge stions for next steps and had indicated that it would submit them in writing, for further reflection. 2.8. In the area of Preferential Rules of Origin for LDCs at the meeting of the Committee on Rules of Origin in May, a number of items related to the implement ation of the Ministerial Decisions had been raised. In relation to transparency, almost all preference -granting Members, except two, ha d notified their preferential rules of origin for LDCs. There ha d also been some progress on coverage of import statistic s. Full notifications ha d been received from several preference -granting Members. The Chair understood that there were still some important gaps in the statistics, which hinder ed the ability of the Committee to comprehensively monitor the utilization of th ose preferences. On this, the Secretariat ha d continued to examine patterns in the utilization of trade preferences by LDCs and ha d presented a report analysing trends for a 5 -year period. In addition, a webinar had taken place in May on preference utiliza tion. He encourage d delegations to visit the WTO website to review the available materials. Also in May, several Members had updated the Committee on recent developments in their preference schemes. 2.9. Regarding Duty -Free Quota -Free market access for LDCs, at the last CTD meeting, a number of Members had provided updated information on their DFQF schemes for LDCs. At the next meeting in November, the Committee would undertake its annual review of the steps taken by Members to provide DFQF market access to LDCs . 2.10. Regarding the Monitoring Mechanism for S&D, the situation remain ed the same. The CTD Chair once again had urged Members to come to a common understanding on how to move forward with the Mechanism. He had also indicated his intention to work with Members in informal settings to explore ways to make the Mechanism operational. 2.11. Concerning the Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology, he understood that at the May meeting some Members stressed that advancing the work in that area had become imperative because of COVID -19, including in the context of assisting LDCs level -up their development. The Chair ha d initiated a process of informal consultations to assess how to revive work and what could be done differently to fulfil the mandate. 2.12. 2.13. Regarding Aid for Trade, a formal meeting of the CTD's Aid for Trade session had been held to launch preparations for the 2020 -2022 monitoring and evaluation exercise. The CTD Chair had given an overview of the plans for the exercise in terms of themes to be addressed, timelines and survey methods. The Secretariat ha d prepared draft monitoring and evaluation questionnaires, and Members ha d been invited to provide comments by the end of August. A further informal session to discuss th ose comments would be scheduled. The monitoring and evaluation exercise would then be launched, with a deadline for responses at the end of the year. The results of th at exercise w ould be presented at the Eighth Global Review of Aid for Trade, which was envisaged for mid -2022. 2.13. And finally, on Trade Facilitation, the Committee continue d its work on the four -year review of the TFA, and aim ed to have it completed ahead of MC12. The rate of implementation commitments stood at just over 70% for the entire Membership and at 61% for deve loping country Members and LDCs. The rate of ratification remain ed at 94% with 9 Members still to ratify. 2.14. The representative of Chad provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 9 - 2.15. We reiterate the importance of the implementation of the decisions in favour of LDCs , with the aim of accelerating and increasing our integration into global trade , with positive outcomes on the creation of employment and the reduction of poverty . An effective operationalization of previous decisions taken in favour of LDCs is more than ev er crucial at this time of financial crisis , when our economies are particularly affected and the diversification of our productive capacity and of our export potential is ever more necessary. The LDC Group will publish its proposal on the implementation o f decisions in favour of LDCs in order to share our expectations with Members just after the summer break. 2.16. The LDC Group would like to thank Members who have notified their preferences and will call on those who have not done so to do it for market access , DFQS and for the services waiver. We need to notify more if we are to ensure the implementation of these decisions. As far as work on notifications is concerned for the implementation of the services waiver, the LDC group has co - organized a workshop with the Council for Trade in Services that took place in June. We would like to thank the Chair, the Secretariat and the Members for the success of that workshop and we note that in the future and in the context of the preparation s for MC12 , that we will be a ble to take stock of the outcomes of the workshop and of any upcoming recommendation. The surveys can be conceived or designed to provide indications with regard to the services exports of LDCs through digital intermediary platforms, in line with the OECD, WTO, IMF handbook to measure digital trade, published in 2020. Furthermore, we think it is useful for Members who are notifying to be aware every year of the initiative s taken by LDCs in order to provide guidance for LDC exporters with regard to how to us e preferences and also to provide information about consumers within their market who actually use the LDCs' services. The WTO should also put into place a LDCs ' services online portal which would look at the obstacles and challenges and also the best prac tices in operationalizing the preferences. 2.17. We intend to present recommendations at the 12th Ministerial Conference to look at the stocktake of the situation from here to the 13th Ministerial Conference . That could include exploring any improvement with regard to the level of services export s from LDCs . Additional preparation can be done to improve preferences in order to allow the growth of LDCs' participation in trade in services within preference -granting Members requesting LDCs ' services, as well as an assessment of the options beyond the preferences themselves , in order to facilitate the utilization of these preferences , and an assessment of any change in information about the rebound of LDC services or new opportunities since the pa ndemic and if the waiver should be made permanent , given the difficulties in collecting data, the complexities with regard to information as well as the fluctuating capacities in LDCs. 2.18. As far as preferential rules of origin for LDCs are concerned , we welc ome the work undertaken up until now within the Committee on Rules of Origin with the implementation of the Ministerial Decisions of Bali and Nairobi. We also call on Members to examine our submissions which have been made within the Committee on Rules of Origin, identifying best practices and the areas which perhaps need reform in terms of rules of origin , if we are to ensure that they align their regimes on preferential rules of origin within our Ministerial Decision. 2.19. Finally, with regard to the 12th Ministerial Conference, the LDC G roup will submit a draft text on preferential rules of origin for LDCs, so that Members can review it and integrate it into the Ministerial Declaration, placing emphasis on relaunching the work of the Committee on Rules of Origin, looking to assess the links between requirements in terms of origin and utilization of trade preferences , whilst also identifying and recommending best practices to Members. 2.20. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 2.21. During my time in Geneva , I witnessed the Appellate Body becoming dysfunctional, multilateral mandates being atrophied and pushed under the carpet , changes in language and a growing indifference to the concern s of develo ping countries and LDCs. The pandemic is a classic example where we could have collectively provided a credible response to the pandemic with some new ideas and initiative s out of the toolbox. I am saddened by the constant business -as-usual approaches and this long-established tradition of working together for the global public good , like equitable access to vaccines , appear to be floundering. However, I remain optimistic and hope that there will be a turnaround for the better in the near future. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 10 - 2.22. Indonesia continues to reiterate its priority and need to deliver the mandated issues in agriculture and fisheries subsidies for MC12 , based on the Bali, Nairobi and Buenos Aires outcomes. On agriculture, we believe that MC12 should not leave without a meaningful outcome towards the establishment of a permanent solution on public stockholding for food security and a comprehensive and bal anced outcome on the S pecial Safeguard Mechanism. Agriculture reform is urgently needed to create a fair discipline that addresses the current pandemic challenges and its impact on food security. Indonesia welcomes Members' proposal s that provide option s for the conclusion of the permanent solution on PSH , such as the one submitted by the African Group , to help provide a common basis upon which further negotiation on the development of new rules on PSH can proceed. In this regard, Indonesia with cosponsorin g Members also has pre sented a draft permanent solution for PSH. We hope it is a realistic and viable proposal that could work as a basis for discussion towards MC12. Indonesia requests all Members to sincerely consider the proposal during the upcoming CoASS on 29 July. 2.23. On fisheries subsid ies, we urge Members to remain in line with the Buenos Aires mandate in prohibiting subsidies that contribute to overfishing and overcapacity , while reserving special and differential treatment. Respecting the principle o f common but differentiated responsibility in this discipline is a key ingredient to achieve a balanced discipline. We note that much work needs to be done to resolve imbalances and other technical issues to move forward with this negotiation, but we are optimistic that we would resolve those imbalances in our upcoming negotiation after the summer break. 2.24. The representative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 2.25. I would like to align my statement with the statement of the LDCs Regarding the Nairobi Decision on Preferential Rules of Origin for LDCs, my delegation commends on the work undertaken so far by the Committee on Rule s of Origin. The Committee assessed the utilization by LDCs of a number of preferential programs of prefer ence-granting Members. In all the assessments done, the results indicate that the utilization of preferences by LDCs still stand low and rules of origin applicable to LDCs ' imports from the respective preference granting members are not yet aligned to the Nairobi Decision. Therefore, it is correct to assert that there hasn’t been a substantial progress in implementing the requirements of the Nairobi Decision such as to allow 75% of None Originating Materials of inputs used by LDCs, flexible cumulation, simp lification of rules on Change of Tariff Classification (CTC) and documentary requirements. 2.26. It is high time for preference -granting Members to seriously consider reforming their rules of origin applicable to LDCs ' imports based on the Nairobi Decision and best practices identified in the Committee on Rules of Origin (CRO). Preference -granting Members also need to share in the Committee on Rules of Origin, the experience of administering their respective rules of origin in relation to the utilization of pref erences by LDCs. 2.27. In our view, the MC12 Ministerial Declaration should ensure that M embers reaffirm their commitment to expeditiously implement in full the Bali and Nairobi outcomes in favour of LDCs, particularly on preferential services and rules of orig in. 2.28. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 2.29. The Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Export Competition was adopted in December 2015. The European Union continues to urge the remaining Members that have not yet submitted their revised schedules, to make the necessary schedule modifications to eliminate export subsidy commitments as soon as possible and indeed in time for MC12. 2.30. The 2021 Export Competition Questionnaire was the first occasion on which developing countries were required to submit replies. The European Union is disappointed with the low response rate. We will be interested to discuss this further in the regular Committee on Agriculture in September. The European Union also looks forward to the discus sion in the Committee on Agriculture regular meetings on the triennial review of the Nairobi Decision. We count on Members ' active participation on how to enhance disciplines and ensure no circumvention of commitments. 2.31. The European Union notes that India has invoked the Bali Ministerial Decision on public stockholding for the second time in its DS:1 notification submitted on 8 April 2021. This notification WT/GC/M/19 2 - 11 - was examined in the June Regular Committee on Agriculture together with the remaining questions from last year 's notification to which India still has to reply in full. We look forward to further engagement in the next regular Committee on Agriculture meeting. 2.32. On the Bali Ministerial Decision on Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) administration, the European Union is pleased to see the progress made in the last regular Committee on Agriculture on the Bali TRQ review, and in particular the text on changing the wording for the under -fill mechanism, which was proposed by Costa Rica. We are optimistic that further progre ss can be made in the coming regular Committee on Agriculture. We urge the membership to engage on this issue and work constructively. We would underline that the result of the discussion on this in the regular Committee on Agriculture should lead to a dec ision by Ministers at MC12. 2.33. The representative of India provided the following statement: 2.34. As we work towards outcomes for MC12, we would like to reiterate the Ministerial mandates from Bali and Nairobi regarding an effective, permanent outcome on public stockholding for food security purposes. The Ministerial mandate for PSH is clear, that the PSH negotiations have to be on an accelerated, separate track, any effort to link these discussions with other pillars is undermining the Ministerial mandate. If the WTO membership cannot deliver on the mandated issues of the past Ministerial meeting s, then first, its competency comes under question, second, it leaves a doubt in the mind whether it will hono ur in the future the outcomes of MC12 , if any. In a nutshell, the credibility of the WTO hinges on the outcomes of the Bali and Nairobi Ministerial mandates, especially when food security issues have become pronounced due to the ongoing pandemic . The scale and its continuous resurgence over different parts of t he world indicate that the pandemic may not be easing anytime soon. In these unpreceded times, the WTO should get out of the self -imposed impasse and redeem itself by delivering a permanent solution on the PSH. 2.35. Pursuant to the Bali Ministerial Decision on Public Stockholding for Food Security Purposes and the General Council Decision of 2014 , as contained in document WT/L/939, India notified the Committee on Agriculture that it has exceeded the de minimis level of market price support for rice for the mark eting year 2018 -2019 and 2019 -20. India's public stockholding programmes for food security purposes, covering rice and several other commodities, have been consistently reported in its Table DS:1 notification since 1995. India has been constructively engag ing on this issue with other Members in the meetings of the Committee on Agriculture and the Committee on Agriculture in Special Session. We do not support linking PSH outcomes with outcomes in other pillars. A simple, efficient, and permanent solution on extending PSH for food security purposes to new programs and new products is therefore a key deliverable. In this regard, I suggest that the new submissions by the Africa Group and the proposal being worked upon by G33 are a good basis for CoA SS to take the process forward. 2.36. The proponents calling for transparency should lead by example. It is seen that this one flag bearer of transparency submitted DS:1 Notification for the marketing year 2018 -19 in May 2021 many months past the deadline of 30 September 2 019. (Table DS:1 for the Marketing Year 2018 -19 was notified on 17 May 2021 vi a G/AG/N/EU/69). The Member has not submitted its DS:1 Notification for 2019 -20, which is due for more than 10 months now. The Member gave its reasons in the past to explain the delay. While it feels it can have reasons not to notify on time, it is ironical, it does not see others can also have genuine reasons for not notifying on time. As a responsible member of the WTO, India is conscious of its notification obligati ons and has been making consistent efforts to comply with them. Our Domestic Support and Market Access notifications are up to date. Our track record with meeting our transparency obligations has been much better than that of several Members pressing for e nhanced transparency at the WTO. 2.37. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 2.38. Proposals for a new UK Developing Countries Trading Scheme will replace the GSP and we have invited colleagues ' views on the scheme. This is due to come into effect next year. It will be more sustainable, pro -growth and simpler. We are looking to be best of class. Live consultations are underway until 12 September and we welcome Members ' feedback. 2.39. The representative of South Africa provided the follo wing statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 12 - 2.40. In Bali, Ministers instructed the Trade Negotiations Committee to work on the remaining Doha Development Agenda issues, particularly on agriculture, development and LDC issues. This work remains outstanding and is even more important in the context of the COVID -19 pandemic that will have a disproportionate impact on developing countries. COVID -19 will have significant implications on food security. Already 174 million people across 58 countries are grappling with serious food consumption gaps or above -usual acute malnutrition, i.e. serious levels of food insecurity. The WTO will need to prioritise agriculture and deliver a food and livelihoods agenda at MC12. 2.41. The General Council took note of the Chairman's statement as circula ted in document JOB/GC/266 and of the statements by Members . 3 WORK PROGRAMME ON SMALL ECONOMIES – REPORT BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE DEDICATED SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT 3.1. The Chair recalled that i n line with the agreement in the General Council in 2002, the Work Programme on Small Economies was a standing item on the agenda and the Committee on Trade and Development report ed regularly on the progress of work in its Dedicated Sessions . In Buenos Aires, Ministers had reaffirmed their commitment to the Work Programme and instructed the CTD to continue its work in Dedicated Sessions under the overall responsibility of the General Council. He invite d Ambassador P iracha to provide his report. 3.2. Ambassador Muhammad Mujtaba Piracha (Pakistan), Chairman of the Dedicated Session of the CTD, provided the following report : 3.3. I am pleased to inform Members that a meeting of the CTD 's Dedicate d Session on Small Economies was held on July 6th. The meeting was convened to discuss the economic and trade impact of natural disasters on small economies. As part of this discussion, presentations were made by experts from the FAO, the ITC, UNCTAD and t he WTO. Presentations were also made by Ecuador, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines – members of the Group of Small, Vulnerable Economies – on their national experiences in this regard. The presentations, and the subsequent discussion, pointed to the dif ficulties faced by small economies in coping with natural disasters. Some ideas were shared on what could be done to allow small economies to be in a better position to deal with the negative effects of these disasters. Overall, I believe the meeting prove d very useful and instructive. 3.4. The Dedicated Session will have some work to do in preparation for MC12. In particular, going by past practice, the Dedicated Session will need to approve a report to the General Council, which would contain a summary of the work undertaken since the last Ministerial Conference. This report, in the past, has also contained the elements of an agreed text for a decision on the Work Programme on Small Economies, particularly the possible elements of future work. As I mentione d in my intervention at the General Council meeting of 5 May, I have been given to understand that the SVE Group Coordinator will be consulting with Members on this matter. The objective of the SVE Group would be to eventually table a proposed text for a M inisterial Decision on the Work Programme on Small Economies in the Dedicated Session, for approval by Members. I shall remain in touch with the SVE Group Coordinator, as well as with other Members, in this regard, and will be convening a meeting of the De dicated Session after the summer break. 3.5. The representative of Guatemala provided the following statement: 3.6. After several consultations with different Members, my delegation is very pleased that the session on the economic and trade effects of natural disas ters on small economies has finally taken place. This session is of utmost importance as many small and vulnerable economies, such as Guatemala, are subject to extreme weather events and natural disasters. During the session, important participants from in ternational organizations such as the FAO, UNCTAD, the WTO, and the ITC presented data and information on the devastating effects of such disasters on small economies. During their presentations they shared valuable information on their experiences and recommendations for measures to help small economies to improve their resilience in order to offset the adverse effects of such disasters. In addition to these presentations, several small and vulnerable economies took the floor to share their national experi ences. 3.7. My delegation concludes from these discussions that natural disasters have a serious impact on infrastructure, logistics and communications in affected countries and, as a consequence, in many WT/GC/M/19 2 - 13 - cases hinder the flow of goods and services that are ne cessary to maintain a stable economy. It is important to continue to discuss how the WTO can help small economies, particularly when they are affected by disasters such as these. During the meeting, the importance of measuring the impact of such disasters on world trade was highlighted, as it is important to establish the factual basis in order to work on possible ways and solutions to reduce the impact that such disasters can have on small economies. Given that the WTO already monitors trade flows globally , we believe that it could work with international organizations such as the FAO to measure the effects of natural disasters on trade. 3.8. The representative of Barbados , on behalf of CARICOM , delivered the following statement: 3.9. CARICOM was particularly pleased with the convening of the CTD's Dedicated Session on small economies on 6 July, which specifically addresses economic and trade impacts of natural disasters on small economies. We welcome the presentations by FAO, ITC, UNCT AD and the WTO Secretariat. We are also gratified that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, members of CARICOM, were able to make a presentation which demonstrated the reality of many small vulnerable economies that are exposed to natural disasters of many va rieties. The case of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines includes having to deal simultaneously with volcanic eruption and also Atlantic hurricanes. We are also highly appreciative of the hard and dedicated work of the permanent delegation of Guatemala and th e WTO Secretariat in making the dedicated session a reality and a success. 3.10. Most of the populations of CARICOM countries live in high -risk areas. They are exposed to sea level rise, weak infrastructure and heavy reliance on climate sensitive sectors such a s tourism, agricultures and fisheries. We anticipate that, as climate change compounds the problem of natural disasters in making them more severe and frequent, the impact on the economies of our countries could consequently be more severe. Natural disaste rs undermine our ability to attain macroeconomic and development goals and to break free from the vicious cycle of low -growth and high -debt prevalent in the Caribbean region. The high costs incurred by climate -induced events have also contributed to the re gion's high public debt, with as much as 15% of the debt accumulated by some countries over the previous decade being attributable to post -disaster reconstruction and investment in building disaster resilience. These problems also limit our fuller integrat ion into the multilateral trading system. Therefore, even as we seek to find solutions combatting the deadly global public health pandemic which we are currently facing, we cannot afford to relegate the susceptibilities of SVEs to other exogenous shocks, n atural disasters and the effects of climate change to the background. It is, therefore, incumbent upon us to keep these issues alive. Moving ahead towards MC12, our aim is to gain a renewal commitment for Ministers to reaffirm the Work Programme on Small E conomies in the form of a Ministerial Decision. 3.11. I now deliver a brief statement on behalf of Barbados. The Work Programme on Small Economies continues to be of particular importance to Barbados. The topic that will be open for discussion today is one whic h speaks to the core of our vulnerabilities. Barbados thanks the Chair of the CTD for his report and for convening the Dedicated Session on small economies, which focused, as I mentioned before, on the economic and trade impact of natural disasters on smal l economies. Small economies are susceptible to natural disasters and over the last years many have been exposed to meteorological and geophysical hazards. These hazards range from hurricanes and cyclones in the Pacific to volcanic eruptions, droughts and flooding. Inherent vulnerabilities of small vulnerable island economies have been exacerbated by greater threats such as extreme weather events and climate change. As I said earlier, this is something that cannot be overstated. On 2 July, for the first tim e in 67 years, Barbados was hit by a major storm. Whilst the extent of damages is still being assessed, it caused disruptions to our tourism sector through the closure of our airport and stagnating commercial activity in the entire country. 3.12. The impact of the eruption of the Soufriere volcano on Barbados is evidence that natural disasters do not need to have a direct or immediate impact on a country to have a significant impact on that country. Our dependence on trade and our ability to influence shipping g oods or large shipping liners entails that supply chain disruptions caused by natural disasters have a knock -on impact on food security for small vulnerable economies like Barbados, whose container volumes are incredibly small. Like other small vulnerable economies, Barbados is highly dependent on trade, food security and inputs into other sectors including the tourism sector. As such, given Barbados is dependent on interregional trade, and the country's ability to trade – mainly through the import and export goods – is therefore curtailed for some time during this period. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 14 - 3.13. In light of the impact of natural disasters, we would like to continue to discuss the situation relating to the high levels of debt. Vulnerable economies consider it to be timely to have wider discussions on this issue at the WTO , particularly in the lead up to the Ministerial. We truly believe that it is time for us to examine the role of the organization and to examine the nexus between trade and natural disasters . I say that particularl y having been the Chair of the CTE for one year where these issues were being fleshed out, and how it can assist small economies in this regard. Therefore, we hope we will be able to build upon the body of work which has been started in the WTO and other international organizations. It must not be all for naught. We look forward to the commencement of discussions and to the text of the Draft Decision on the Work Programme on Small Economies, for adoption by our Ministers at the Ministerial , and also to participating in the consultations to finalise this important text for the WTO Ministerial agenda. 3.14. The representative of Mauritius provided the following statement: 3.15. Mauritius would like to thank the Chair of the CTD for holding the Dedicated Session on small economies on trade and economic effects of natural disasters. I think that t he discussions highlighted that small economies continue to pay the highest price for the damage which has been done to the planet. Erratic and extreme weather con ditions, rising sea levels and the pandemic have caused , and will continue to cause , significant loss for small economies. Whilst a ll countries in the world face natural disasters from time to time, the impact on small economies is always disproportionatel y high. I recall the case of cyclone Hugo, which is quoted all the time as having in three days set back the GDP of Jamaica by 500%. But beyond the natural disasters, changing weather conditions are also destroying our ocean resources, on which many small island developing states rely, but which also hold potential for future economic development. Whilst we encourage discussions on how to support small and vulnerable economies at the CTD, we also believe that it would be good to try and find some meaningful solutions long -term on how the small economies may best be assisted . I look forward to a discussion at the CTD on whether the rules we have carved out at the WTO are fair on the small economies and , if not, what changes should be brought when we look at t he reform of the WTO on this issue. 3.16. The representative of Vanuatu , on behalf of the Pacific Group , provided the following statement : 3.17. Our Group aligns with the SVE statement made by Guatemala. Small Vulnerable Economies face significant challenges. We are very small open economies, dependent on a very few exports, are highly susceptible to external economic shocks, and are uncompetitive due to high trade costs that we face, owing to our remoteness, smallness and geographical fragmentation. These structural characteristics are exacerbated by climate change and natural disasters. These disasters are growing in frequency and intensity and which often wipe away a significant proportion of our economy. COVID -19 has further exacerbated these vulnerabilities as ou r major economic sectors such as the tourism industry collapses and exports and remittances decline. The Pacific Group therefore welcomed the Dedicated Session held on 6 July which focussed on the Economic and Trade Impact of Natural Disasters on Small Eco nomies and how to build resilience. Many useful lessons and experiences were discussed. The next step is how to translate these into framing responses for the fuller integration of small, vulnerable economies into the multilateral trading system , as required by paragraph 35 of the Doha Agenda. We therefore encourage Members to engage constructively to facilitate meaningful responses for integrating SVEs into the multilateral trading system. The Pacific Group also supports a Draft Decision for MC12 to continue this important work. 3.18. The representative of Fiji provided the following statement: 3.19. Fiji wishes to commend you for your report in particular for the meeting conducted by the Committee on Trade and Development Session - Dedicated to Small Econo mies which had been pending for a while. In this regard, we wish to register our gratitude to the delegation of Guatemala for its leadership and dedication to the SVE Group and who was instrumental in this milestone progress. The session was highly rewardi ng and beneficial in view of the trade effects posed by natural disasters on small economies. The session was bolstered with the presence of partner organi zations who shed light on the effects of natural disasters on small economies including recommendatio ns on the way forward to mitigate the current circumstance faced by our small island economies. From the knowledge sharing session it became very clear that natural disasters ha ve serious disastrous effects on our economies , that impinges on our ability as a small island developing state like Fiji to contribute effectively in the global value chain. As a way forward , it is important to WT/GC/M/19 2 - 15 - gauge the trade effects of natural disasters on small economies. The WTO should also envisage appropriate mechanisms that w ould assist small economies withstand such challenges and to build back stronger in view of the revolving nature of natural disasters. Finally , Fiji aligns its intervention with the statements delivered by Vanuatu for the Pacific Group 3.20. The General Council took note of the report of the Chairman of the CTD and of the statements. 4 TRIPS COUNCIL MATTERS 4.1 Status Report on the Considerations by the TRIPS Council on the "Proposal for a Waiver from Certain Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID -19" (IP/C/W/669) – Statement by the Chair of the Council for TRIPS 4.1. The Chair recalled that this item relate d to a status report by the TRIPS Council Chair on the revised "Proposal for a Waiver from Certain Pro visions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID -19" in document IP/C/W/669/Rev.1. Since the May meeting, the Council for TRIPS had considered th e request again at its informal and formal meetings in May, June and July . He therefore invite d Ambassador Sørli to provide a status report on the TRIPS Council's consideration of th e matter. 4.2. Ambassador Dagfinn Sørli (Norway), Chair of the TRIPS Council , delivered the following report : 4.3. At the meeting of the TRIPS Council on 15 -16 October 2020, India and South Africa introduced document IP/C/W/669, requesting a waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the prevention, containment and treatment of COVID -19, which had been c irculated on 2 October 2020 and has since been co -sponsored by the delegations of Kenya, Eswatini, Mozambique, Pakistan, Bolivia, Venezuela, Mongolia, Zimbabwe, Egypt, the African Group, the LDC Group, the Maldives, Fiji, Namibia, Vanuatu, Indonesia and Jo rdan. Since the introduction of the document, discussions took place in various formal and informal TRIPS Council meetings. Delegations exchanged views, asked questions, sought clarifications and provided replies, clarifications, and information, including through documents IP/C/W/670, IP/C/W/671, IP/C/W/672, IP/C/W/673 and IP/C/W/674, on the waiver request. Since the last status report to the General Council on 5 -6 May 2021, the co -sponsors issued a revised proposal on 21 May 2021, which was circulated in document IP/C/W/669/Rev.1. The revised waiver request was presented at an informal open -ended meeting of the Council on 31 May and introduced at its formal meeting on 8 -9 June 2021. Following the arrangement of a text-based process, discussions continued i n small -group consultations, at informal open -ended meetings on 17 and 30 June, and 6 and 14 July, and at a formal meeting of the Council on 20 July. 4.4. In the context of the text -based process, delegations held focused discussions on the topics of scope, bo th from the perspective of products and of IP rights, on duration, implementation and on protection of undisclosed information. Delegations engaged positively and their detailed substantive exchanges helped clarify various aspects and nuances of positions. While delegations remain committed to the common goal of providing timely and secure access to high -quality, safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines and medicines for all, disagreement persists on the fundamental question of whether a waiver is the appr opriate and most effective way to address the shortage and inequitable distribution of and access to vaccines and other COVID -related products. 4.5. In addition, a proposal for a draft General Council declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health in the circumstances of a pandemic, issued by the European Union on 21 June 2021 and circulated in IP/C/W/681, has also been discussed in those meetings. Delegations exchanged views, asked questions, sought clarifications and provided replies, clarifications, an d information. Disagreement persists on the fundamental question of whether this proposal is the appropriate and most effective way to address the shortage and inequitable distribution of and access to vaccines and other COVID -related products. 4.6. This means that the TRIPS Council has not yet completed its consideration of the revised waiver request. The TRIPS Council will therefore continue its consideration of the revised waiver request, including through small -group consultations and informal open -ended me etings, and report back to the General Council as stipulated in Article IX:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement. In addition, the TRIPS WT/GC/M/19 2 - 16 - Council will also continue in the same manner its consideration of the other related proposals by Members. This concludes the Co uncil's status report. 4.7. The Chairman thank ed Ambassador Sørli for his report on the discussions in the TRIPS Council, and noted that the TRIPS Council would continue its work on that matter. 4.8. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 4.9. We support the statement from the Africa Group and the ACP. We thank the Chair of the TRIPS Council for his status report. The report is an objective assessment of progress up to this point. We are however disappointed t hat we could not reach consensus on the waiver once again. The cost of our deliberations is measured in lives. As of 26 July 2021, 4.2 m illion people have died from this virus. A total of 3 .6 billion vaccine doses have been administered. But so far, approx imately 75% of these have gone to people in high -income and upper -middle -income countries. To put it into perspective, only 13% of the world population is fully vaccinated, with much of the vaccination focused on higher income countries. 4.10. Approximately 2 % of Africans have been fully vaccinated. And even the African Union 's modest goal of getting 20 % of the population vaccinated by the end of 2021 seems out of reach. Around 11 billion doses are needed to fully vaccinate 70% of the world’s population against COVID -19. There is little room for African countries to buy doses on their own. Almost all of t he vaccines forecast to be made in 2021 have already been sold, according to data from Airfinity. This data shows that rich nations have bought up most doses long into the future, often far more than they could conceivably need. This situation must greatly worry all of us, for it shows that the current production, supply and distribution is only working for a small percentage of countries. 4.11. While we welcome progress from the voluntary mechanisms including the launch of the vaccine mRNA technology hub in Sou th Africa and partnerships between S outh African companies and IP holders towards the production of vaccines in S outh Africa, much more needs to be done to scale-up production. The WHO reports that in the week of 12 to 18 July 2021 , there was a 12% increas e of cases compared to the previous week , and many countries across the six WHO regions continue to experience surges in COVID -19 cases. Many jurisdictions are entering a third wave with a drastic increase of infections and mortality due to new variants of concern. The urgency of passing the Waiver has not abated. 4.12. Since our last discussion, the TRIPS waiver proposal has been discussed extensively and the co-sponsors have responded to questions and requests for clarification from WTO Members. The European P arliament recently approved a resolution "calling for support for proactive, constructive, and text -based negotiations for a temporary TRIPS Waiver of the WTO TRIPS Agreement, aiming to enhance global access to affordable COVID -19-related medical products and to address global production constraints and supply shortages ". The waiver also received support from over 100 IP academic experts in an open letter. While we recognize that IP rights are important for innovation, we must recognize that they must serve the public interest. It is in the global public interest to provide access to vaccines and the technologies to produce them in the regions that need them. The urgency of passing the TRIPS waiver remains, given the continued loss of life which is perfectly preventable. 4.13. The co -sponsors have argued that the TRIPS waiver is a necessary, targeted, time -limited and proportionate legal measure directed at addressing intellectual property barriers in a direct, transparent and efficient fashion, which is consistent with the WTO legal framework. Passing this waiver allows companies the freedom to operate and to produce covered COVID -19 health product s and to use health technologies without the fear of infringing another party 's IP rights and the attendant threat of l itigation. Furthermore, passing a TRIPS waiver acts as an important political, moral and economic lever towards encouraging solutions aimed at global equitable access to COVID -19 health products and technologies , including vaccines, therapeutics and diagno stics, which is in the wider interest of the global public. While vaccines are important, saving lives necessitates access to diagnostics, treatments, oxygen and personal protective equipment, to prevent, treat and combat COVID -19. It is likely that millio ns more people will contract COVID -19 and would need treatment and care in the years to come, as the realities of vaccine production makes it difficult to replicate and ramp -up production in all countries at the same time. Many products related to the prevention, containment and treatment of COVID -19 are potentially patent -protected, so a TRIPS WT/GC/M/19 2 - 17 - waiver could promote and enhance access to better care for sick people, even if the vaccines are not imminently available. 4.14. One of the major gaps exposed during this pandemic has been the lack of international solidarity and sharing: the sharing of pathogen data, epidemiological information, resources, and technology. It has also revealed the profound gap in the tools that every nation needs to keep its people safe, es pecially Africa that imports 99% of its vaccine needs. 4.15. As the DG of the WHO said at the 138th International Olympic Committee Session in Japan: "The global failure to share vaccines, tests, and treatments – including oxygen – is fuelling a two - track pandem ic: the haves are opening -up, while the have -nots are locking down. The longer this discrepancy persists, the longer the pandemic will drag on, and so will the social and economic turmoil it brings." 4.16. If there was a time when faith in humanity is tested , it is now. I am however reminded by Tata Mandela quote when he said : "I am fundamentally an optimist. Whether that comes from nature or nurture, I cannot say. Part of being optimistic is keeping one's head pointed toward the sun, one's feet moving forward. There were many dark moments when my faith in humanity was sorely tested, but I would not and could not give myself up to despair. That way lays defeat and death ." In his well-known autobiography "Long Walk to Freedom ", Tata Nelson Mandela reminds us that he was born in a year in which humanity faced challenges similar to the current challenges that the world is confronted by, specifically that of the COVID -19 pandemic. He remarks, and I quote: "The year of my birth, marked the end of the Great War ; of the outbreak of an influenza pandemic that killed millions throughout the world. " If he were alive today, having been born in the midst of such challenges and into a life of struggle that was given momentum by global solidarity, he would most certainl y urge us as humanity to rise together in solidarity to save lives everywhere, because none of us are safe until all are safe. 4.17. The WTO has the policy tools to contribute towards universal access of COVID -19-related medical products and technologies. We mus t deploy all policy tools. All proposals and initiative s aimed at addressing barriers to production are not substitutes , but contribute from different perspectives and should be welcomed with a view to find landing zones on all. A WTO response to COVID -19 is fundamental to a meaningful outcome at MC12. I hope we can work together in solidarity to ensure that the WTO is on the right side of history. 4.18. In conclusion Chair, the previous cycle of small group and informal meetings of the TRIPS Council were very us eful and informative and should continue to revisit some of the issues that require further discussion. 4.19. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 4.20. We wish to refer to our statement at the last G eneral Council meeting on this issue and further underscore the urgency for Members to move to constructive text -based negotiations on this proposal in the TRIPS Council. We thank the E uropean Union for their proposal to the TRIPS Council titled "Urgent Trade Policy Responses t o the Covid -19 Crisis: Intellectual Property " contained in document IP/C/W/680 and the Draft General Council Declaration on the Trips Agreement and Public Health in the Circumstances of a Pandemic , contained in document IP/C/W/681. We note that these propo sals are centred on the activation of existing TRIPS flexibilities to deal with the pandemic. We wish to state that the TRIPS Agreement constitute s a barrier to ramping -up of production in developing countries , and existing limited and restrictive voluntar y licenses provisions have not helped the situation. Furthermore, existing flexibilities of the TRIPS Agreement , especially Article 31 and Article 31bis are not sufficient , given that they are not designed to address the challenge of global health emergenc ies such as that posed by the COVID -19 pandemic. 4.21. It is for th ese reasons that we believe the EU proposal cannot effectively address the current precarious situation which is exacerbated by huge and ever -increasing therapeutics and vaccines supply -demand g ap. The solution lies in rapid access by every country to affordable diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines to combat this COVID -19 menace. This can only be achieved by ramping - up the production of these products in developing countries. We look forward to constructive text - based negotiations on the proposal contained in document IP/C/W/669/R ev.1 in the TRIPS Council , so we can achieve a balanced outcome on this issue. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 18 - 4.22. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement: 4.23. Since the la st meeting of the General Council, at which the Proposal for a Waiver from Certain Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID -19 (IP/C/W/669/R ev.1) was discussed , the proponents have submitted a revised version and several meetings have been held to clarify views. As previously noted, Argentina considers it of utmost importance that significant and effective joint action to address the pandemic be agreed to at the forthcoming MC12. The current health crisis and poor vaccine distribution, especially in developing countries, forces us to consider solutions focused on equitable access to vaccines. Argentina supports the proposal to waive intellectual property rights, on the understanding that extraordinary situation s require responses that go beyond the current regulatory tools. We must therefore continue the discussion and text -based negotiations, with a commitment to finding common ground. Argentina will continue to participate actively and constructively to reach consensual solutions, with a focus on improving access to vaccines, treatments, and medicines to combat COVID -19. 4.24. The representative of Barbados , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 4.25. I am speaking on behalf of the CARICOM Group, and w e also align with the ACP statement under this agenda item. CARICOM recognizes that the COVID -19 pandemic is far from over. We are still counting the costs of pandemic lives, socio -economic dislocation and the degradation of our health system. If there was any doubt before regarding our interconnectedness, the pandemic has certainly put this to rest. As variants emerge and spread faster, it is clear that no country is safe until all countries are safe. In t his context, equitable access to preventive, containment and treatment measures for COVID -19 for all becomes even more critical. CARICOM takes note of the text-based process which is ongoing. We further take note that the TRIPS Council will continue its consideration of the waiver request, including through small group consultations. We encourage Members to remain diligent, constructive, transparent and inclusive in their deliberations on this important topic. We also look forward to further reports to the General Council. 4.26. I now take the floor on behalf of Barbados. We believe that the work over the last few weeks has been instrumental in forging constructive engagement amongst WTO Members. We believe that this will be key to delivering meaningful outcomes on the prevention, containment and treatment of COVID -19. The pandemic continues to be challenging in terms of health and the economy. The number of positive cases and deaths continue to increase. There are more troubling fears regarding new variants , which can still affect any positive response and recovery that we have been making over the last year. Furthermore, importantly, access to vaccines and life -saving medical supplies continue s to be uneven and inequitable and I really want to emphasize this poin t. We continue to be uneven and inequitable across many countries in the world. It is, therefore, very clear that the WTO has a role to play in the response to and recovery from the pandemic. 4.27. Barbados strongly welcomes the revised proposal that has been submitted by the proponents of the waiver. The discussions on this issue have been encouraging and have certainly given us a better understanding of Members' positions, both proponents and non -proponents alike. Barbados continues to urge Members to en gage in text -based discussions with the hope that we can reach consensus and an outcome which incorporates the interests of all Members, including Barbados. We align with the statements delivered on behalf of the CARICOM and ACP Groups. 4.28. The representative of the Central African Republic provided the following statement: 4.29. Like the African and LDC Groups, we support the Chair's report and hope that following the discussions, we will be able to agree on a text catering to the interests of developing countries as regards technology transfer , that will promote increased production capacities with a consistent mechanism , guaranteeing the equitable distribution of COVID -19 vaccines and pharmaceutical products. 4.30. In this international environment marked by the effects of the COVID -19 pandemic, an agreement encouraging technology transfer is very much needed and would strengthen trade measures adopted at the WTO level , while contributing to the promotion of herd immunity and global economic recovery. Today, we have a gl obal responsibility to offer appropriate solutions to the challenges facing the world. Now is the time for us to assume this responsibility in order to leave a legacy for future generations and show everyone what the WTO multilateral trading system is WT/GC/M/19 2 - 19 - capable of. This pandemic has shown the limits of our system, but also the strategies that we must adopt in order to improve the way we work and ensure that, going forward, we are proactive and able to prevent rather than cure. 4.31. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement: 4.32. I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate Colombia's commitment to the search for a coordinated response to the global health crisis caused by COVID -19 and the economic effects arising from measures taken to contain it. We are convinced that the WTO will be instrumental in ensuring a concerted response, from the technical level, necessary for overcoming bottlenecks in global production and distribution chains for vaccines and medicines. As we have reiterated on various occasions, this concerted response should contain elements in the areas identified as priorities: intellectual property, export restrictions and direct dialogue with producers in the pharmaceutical industry. 4.33. The representa tive of China provided the following statement: 4.34. We are glad to witness Members ' active and constructive engagement in the text -based discussion since this June, which provided opportunities to clarify each other 's positions and concerns, and enable releva nt parties to have deeper consultations on the key issues in the proposals. However, diverging views still exist over some key elements, such as the scope and duration of the waiver, the relationship between the waiver and ramping up the production of vaccines, etc . It is clear that time is not on our side. The spread of Delta variants recently has put developing Members with insufficient vaccination rate in greater danger. It is a common challenge as well as an urgent call for the international community to expand the COVID vaccine manufactur ing and to ensure fair and equitable access to COVID vaccines for developing Members. The WTO, by exploring a possible landing zone on the TRIPS waiver, could demonstrate its value and make its contribution in the fight against the pandemic. Therefore, we call upon all Members to actively engage in all forms of discussions after the summer break with an aim to reach a balanced and effective solution as early as possible. Though facing the challen ges of its own mass vaccination program, China has provided more than 500 million doses of vaccines to other developing countries, and will provide another USD 3 billion in international aid over the next three years to support the COVID -19 response and ec onomic and social recovery in other developing countries. Recently, two Chinese vaccine manufacturers, Sinopharm and Sinovac , signed advance purchase agreement s with Gavi and will provide 550 million C OVID -19 vaccines to the COVAX programme. We will contin ue to do our best to contribute to the global fight against pandemic. 4.35. The representative of Chad provided the following statement: 4.36. The recent trend of the pandemic is very concerning, the economic recovery will be very difficult according to all the projections , and rapid affordable effective and efficacious access to vaccines and to therapeutics for all vulnerable citizens in the world is now the absolute priority. Currently, there are 4.14 million deaths linked to COVID -19, however according to seve ral researchers the number of deaths is more than double than what has been officially declared. Recent statistics show that 2% of LDCs , which as you know represent 14% of the global population , have received at least one injection up to the end of June 20 21. In comparison, 43% of developed countries, which represents 16% of the global population , have received at least one injection during the same period, that is up to the end of June 2021. In 2021, the production was estimated to be between 10 and 14 bil lion, but up until the end of June 2021 approximately 3.5 billion doses have already been produced. Up to mid -July, the establishment of COVAX, managed by the WHO, only managed to deliver 5.3% of the 2 billion doses scheduled for 2021. A temporary time -limited waiver will help a number of countries produce vaccines if they can obtain the appropriate technology, unrestricted supply of raw materials and the legal security from the point of view of intellectual property rights. Vaccines for treatment of COVID -19 and the different variants should be declared global public goods. Our group sincerely hopes to be able to effectively engage in textual negotiations. 4.37. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 4.38. With all the cosponsoring Member s, including the LDC group, Bangladesh attaches high importance and welcomes the discussion of the proposal contained in the revised version WT/GC/M/19 2 - 20 - (IP/C/W/669/Rev.1). In many previous occasions, as my delegation has already emphasised, Members should engage in t ext-based discussion as soon as possible. 4.39. We are facing an unprecedented public health emergency. The priority now is to ensure unconditional, affordable, equitable and timely access to vaccine s, therapeutics, required medical equipment to stop the pandem ic. The TRIPS Council 's objective on this specific discussion, under this waiver proposal, is to overcome barriers in order to achieve equitable and timely access. 4.40. May I point out that the high -income countries that make up 16% of the world population have pre-booked the majority of the vaccines till 2025. On the other hand, the majority of developing countries and particularly the LDCs are left in absolute uncertainty on accessing the vaccine against the virus. There is an urgent need to expand manufacturing globally and to diversify supply, for vaccines, therapeutics and other health products needed in 2021 and beyond. Immediate and unhindered supply of the vaccine to th ese countries is the priority. The TRIPS Agreement or any other regulatory process should not be brought as a hindrance to the most urgent needs of humanity today. 4.41. We welcome any initiative by Members that aim to address the challenges of unhindered supply of vaccines, therapeutics and other medical equipment for the treatment of COVID -19. The current time -limited waiver proposal is with us from October 2020. Let us redouble our efforts in reaching a consensual outcome as early as possible. If we just in vest our time only on the legitimacy of the proposals and not on the substance, we are leading to nowhere. We must act quickly and collectively to remove the barriers to production and supply of affordable and effective vaccine s for all, irrespective of ou r development status. 4.42. The representative of Nepal provided the following statement: 4.43. My delegation wishes to associate with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group and with South Africa and India on behalf of the proponents. A wide ran ge of discussions has been conducted in both formal and informal modes of the TRIPS Council in this matter. A large proportion of the m emberships is in favour of concluding text -based negotiations based on the revised proposal. I reiterate Nepal’s full sup port to the revised proposal and urge all Members to conclud e negotiations at the earliest possible to save millions of lives across the globe. 4.44. The representative of Malaysia provided the following statement: 4.45. Malaysia would like to join other Members in highlighting the common goal of providing timely and equitable access to affordable vaccines and medicines for all. Malaysia wishes to urge strengthened collaboration on this front among the key stakeholders towards equitable, affordable and acc essible COVID -19 vaccines for all. In view of the pressing global needs to prevent the spread and mitigate the COVID -19 pandemic, we wish to stress the importance of undertaking all measures necessary to expand and diversify the supply of vaccines and rela ted goods. We must act sensibly to ensure that no Member is left at the end of the COVID -19 vaccines line. Vaccine -nationalism and vaccine stockpiling are counter -productive in our effort to increase the global vaccination rate and clear the path for a recovery across all our economies. As of 25 July 2021, Malaysia has recorded more than 1 million cumulative confirmed cases and close to 8,000 cumulative deaths, with only 16.5% of the population having been administered two full doses – significantly lower t han most advanced nations. Malaysia wishes to underscore our continued support for Members to engage in meaningful text -based negotiations and finding the appropriate landing zone that will be mutually acceptable by all Members ahead of MC12. 4.46. The represent ative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 4.47. I would like to align myself to the statement of the African Group as delivered by the delegation of Mauritius. Regarding the proposed waiver enshrined in document IP/C/W/669/Rev.1, my delegation , like o ther cosponsors, is looking forward to an early conclusion of the text -based negotiations. My delegation believes that the long -held discussions in the TRIPS Council prior to the commencement of text -based negotiations, have already exhausted most of the k ey concepts and questions of Members on the proposed waiver. COVID -19 has already done enough damage to the world, we greatly depend on vaccines to survive the pandemic. However, the low pace of distribution of vaccines is concerning as it is not adequate to attain the desired herd immunity in a short period WT/GC/M/19 2 - 21 - of time. On the other hand, the mutating pace of the COVID -19 variants is worrisome, rendering the efficacy of the current vaccines to fade away. The production and distribution of vaccines needs to be scaled up , and we believe that the proposed waiver will attract more participants in the production and distribution when the onerous procedures of compulsory licensing are temporarily lifted. At this point, my delegation is prioritising the waiver abov e all other WTO issues that are currently being discussed. According to the Preamble of the WTO Marrakesh Agreement, all other WTO Agreements are for raising standards of living and ensuring full employment of people, but this waiver is for saving the live s of millions of people around the world. Therefore, we urge the membership to exercise flexibilit y in the text -based negotiations process, with a view to conclude the waiver soon. 4.48. The representative of Vanuatu , on behalf of the Pacific Group , provided the following statement: 4.49. The Pacific Group supports the ACP statement and considers this matter as a priority for an outcome at MC12, for the simple reason that human lives matter. We are seeing the onset of a third wave for countries and regions that had brought COVID -19 under control, while others are still struggling from the previous waves of the pandemic. Infections are rising and so are deaths, while vaccine shortages continue to be critical. Vaccine inequity cannot continue. How many more lives need to die before we take action? We must place people at the centre of the solutions, not profits. The TRIPS Waiver in our view provides an effective solution to scale up needed supplies of vaccines. The Pacific Group therefore supports urgent work in the TRI PS Council on text -based discussions, and urges Members to engage constructively, in good faith, and in a solutions -seeking mode so that agreement on an outcome can be reached well before MC12. We also believe this should form part of the overall package o n WTO 's COVID -19 response. 4.50. The representative of Morocco provided the following statement: 4.51. There is a sense of urgency regarding the current situation with a serious deterioration on the epidemiological front, and not just in Africa. Our duty is to act collectively and in a timely fashion to conclude our discussions on a waiver for intellectual property rights relating to COVID -19 vaccines. We think that the WTO has a major role to play in this regard. We thank the Director -General for her engagement and her mobilization , particularly for having brought in other international organizations, in particular WIPO and the WHO. We therefore call for maximum flexibility on behalf of all the actors in this process. We reiterate the importance of effort s towards R &D. This must be done fairly and equitably. It should not be done at the cost of human lives , whilst we continue to tackle a global crisis with very serious health, economic, social and other consequences. We therefore would like to underline that the King dom of Morocco has launched a comprehensive vaccination program which aims at assisting our brother African countries with a view to producing COVID -19 vaccines prior to the end of this year and in the future to tackle other illnesses through a range of di fferent technologies. 4.52. In conclusion, I would like to recall that many high -level scientists, political figures and non - state actors who fully understand the situation have all called us to tackle this waiver in a positive way to the benefit of all. They also called on us to ensure that particularly the most vulnerable amongst us have access to tools that would allow them to tackle COVID -19 given they are currently limited and, in some cases, have zero access. It is through our efforts and given the a bsolute urgency of the situation that the WTO must act. 4.53. The representative of Kenya provided the following statement: 4.54. Kenya aligns with the statement that was delivered by Mauritius on behalf of the African Group. We believe that the proposed waiver will be handy in enhancing prevention, treatment, and containment of COVID -19, by scaling up production of and increasing access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. We therefore urge Members to focus on the ongoing text -based process at the TRIPS Counci l, with a view to expediting the conclusion of the discussions. As the world is now focused on vaccination, which is the most effective way to control the pandemic, we must also appreciate that the coronavirus continues to ravage many people as countries, especially in Africa, battle with the new and more lethal variants. The demand for diagnostics and therapeutics has therefore increased exponentially and no one knows how long this pandemic will last. On the other hand, many developing countries have barel y vaccinated their populations due to limited access to the vaccines, occasioned by supply side constraints, as well as restrictions imposed by WT/GC/M/19 2 - 22 - some vaccine producing countries. The WTO therefore has a role to play in ensuring fair and equitable access to the vaccines. The TRIPS waiver will certainly be helpful in ensuring this access. 4.55. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 4.56. Nine months have elapsed since the proposal was initially submitted and we all know of the excruciating effects of the pandemic on public health conditions of developing and least developed countries. The death toll continues to rise, and our economies are being crippled. Yet, only four percent of the population of African count ries have been vaccinated as compared to nearly forty -five percent in developed countries – what a contrasting tenfold disparity! With such a backdrop , the African Group is pleased that we have now moved to text -based negotiation s. However, we deal extensively on scope, duration, implementation and on protection of information . The negotiation by itself is not an achievement as our people are still deprived of vaccinations. Furthermore, access to products and technology in the manufacturing of vaccin es remain critical and the WTO membership must expeditiously come together to achieve the desired outcome in favour of the TRIPS waiver. The WTO and its membership need to have a response to the COVID -19, and there must be both policy and action coherence globally, involving the WTO, WHO and other international organi zations to find solutions to the global pandemic seriously affecting developing countries, including African countries which do not have access to vaccines and therapeutics. 4.57. The representative of Sierra Leone provided the following statement: 4.58. My delegation would like to endorse the statement by the African Group and to add a few points . On vaccine distribution, we are not begrudging securing vaccines for the needs of the population. This is what all governments do to protect their population. We are extremely grateful for some of the vaccine donations that we have received from wealthier nations. We are in the midst of the third wave , and we all keep saying that less than 2% of the population in Africa have been vaccinated. In some regions it is probably less than 1% , in our region for example. Thousands of people continue to be infected and to die , and there is absolutely no end in s ight without more vaccines being made available. We are simply asking to be given a chance to be able to secure more vaccines. Donations will not do the trick. We need the TRIPS waiver in order to ramp up supplies that will pick up the slack , and there is a huge slack. This is much more than a moral appeal , this is enlightened self -interest. The pandemic will not end in pockets, you cannot create isolated islands of fully vaccinated citizens and leave out a whole sea of unvaccinated people. Travel bans will not do the trick either, mutations of the virus are likely to defeat any vaccine and unless we are able to vaccinate all populations around the world , this pandemic will not end. We appeal for a conclusion of the TRIPS negotiations and for actions to be t aken as soon as possible. 4.59. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP Group , provided the following statement: 4.60. The small groups' meetings and the informal meetings of the TRIPS Council have provided the opportunity for further deliberations and r obust exchanges on the matter. We appreciate the constructive spirit of delegations in these meetings and request continued engagement as well as a greater level of flexibility amongst Members. As a group of developing countries, the ACP Group can attest to the devastating social and economic impacts brought on by the C OVID -19 pandemic. The rate of vaccination in ACP Group and developing countries is very low due to limited access to vaccines with some countries having as low as only 1% of the total population vaccinated. This is noteworthy as it means that economic recovery for many Members of the ACP Group and other developing countries will not be possible in the near future. This is being further co mpounded by the emergence of new strains which are being reported as more contagious. Vaccination of individuals across the world, therefore, has to be a priority particularly for those living in developing countries. We all know that no one is safe until everybody is safe. Furthermore, the recovery of the global economy should not be at the expense of the poor and vulnerable. Therefore, we should all strive to have a response from the WTO in dealing with the pandemic. This sentiment is shared by all WTO Members based on the discussions within the Council over the past weeks and months. 4.61. The ACP Group welcomes the discussions on specific elements of the proposals such as scope, duration, implementation and regulatory data. There should also be continued stru ctured discussions on specific elements of the proposal with a view to concluding the discussions way ahead of MC12. In closing, the ACP Group wishes to reiterate its willingness to continue engaging on this matter and WT/GC/M/19 2 - 23 - is committed to ensuring that the WTO is a part of the solution and effectively contribute to the fight against this pandemic as well as the global economic recovery. Our response should also, to the extent possible, foresee the contribution of the WTO to future pandemics. 4.62. The representative of the Maldives provided the following statement: 4.63. It has become increasingly clear that market -based approaches alone are insufficient to effectively respond to the demands of the COVID -19 pandemic, including the equitable and affordable access to vaccines and therapeutics. The current system of production and supply is failing to mobilize the demand for global production capacity. It is for this reason that we need to move forward constructively on text -based negotiations and achieving a meaningful outcome with regard to the proposed TRIPS waiver in a timely manner. We believe the proposed waiver would enable the utilization of resource capacity and facilitate scaling -up production and enable equitable access to vaccines for everyone. Given the rela tively small proportion of the population in many poorer countries that have been vaccinated, further delays in access will be devastating for all. As we all know, "no one is safe, until everyone is safe ". The next few months will prove to be both importan t and challenging , as we move forward to achieve deliverables for MC12, including on this important issue. This would also be the time to engage constructively and build consensus among us for a better and healthier future for all. 4.64. The representative of Zimbabwe provided the following statement: 4.65. We align ourselves with the statements delivered by Mauritius and South Africa on behalf of the Africa n Group and the co -sponsors of the TRIPS waiver, respectively. Zimbabwe is currently grappling with the tragic i mpact of a third wave of C OVID -19 infections and deaths , the consequence of a recent major upsurge in the D elta variant cases across many parts of our country. Although we have fared relatively well in terms of both the steady implementation of our nationa l vaccination roll-out programme and the sourcing of vaccines for our people - for which we must once again express profound gratitude to China, the Russia n Federation and India for their partnership and generous cooperation - we have a great deal of ground to cover if we are to attain our target of 60% of our population to be fully vaccinated before the end of 2021 , and, with that target, of course, the hope of an effe ctive herd immunity and a safer pathway back towards normality. As we all know, global vaccine shortages are partly attributed to manufacturing capacity constraints, vaccine nationalism, vaccine export restrictions and a range of other factors. The Propos al for a Waiver from Certain Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID -19 remains one of the most obvious remedies towards addressing those shortages, and towards rapidly increasing manufacturing capacity, wher ever possible and practical, thereby ensuring enhanced supply and with it, enhanced safe, equitable, and timely access to C OVID -19 vaccines and therapeutics. Zimbabwe commends Member s for agreeing to move to text -based negotiations of the revised TRIPS waiver proposal, and hopes these negotiations will continue in good faith. Let us remind ourselves that when we reached agreement to move to text -based negotiations, we had just recorded 3 million Covid -related deaths - up from the 1 million recorded deaths a t the time when India and South Africa first tabled the waiver proposal. We have now surpassed 4 million recorded deaths. We therefore urge Member s to be cognizant of the urgency involved, and of the need for both collaboration and flexibility in the searc h for a practical way forward – one that contributes both to minimizing further loss of human life from C OVID -19, and to the steady recovery of economies and livelihoods. 4.66. The representative of Turkey provided the following statement: 4.67. We very much value discussions at the TRIPS Council and other WTO bodies on how to respond and contribute to the global fight against COVID -19 pandemic. There are divergent views among Members with respect to the possible advantages and shortcomings of two different approaches presented to the TRIPS Council. We believe that further clarifications and constructive discussions are needed on both proposals. Addressing the concerns raised by Members in a swift manner and striving to bridge the gap is crucial to provide a timely response to the pandemic. 4.68. The representative of Botswana provided the following statement: 4.69. Botswana aligns itself with the statement delivered by Mauritius on behalf of the African Group. Due to the inequitable access to COVID -19 counte rmeasures in particular vaccines, countries WT/GC/M/19 2 - 24 - in our region , including Botswana, are now experiencing a third wave of new infections with high mortality as hospitals are stretched beyond capacity. As of 15 July 2021, the Africa region has managed to secure s upplies to fully vaccinate only 1.19% of its eligible population. This situation is deeply concerning. The low vaccination coverage and the emergence of new deadly variants mean s that we will struggle to end the pandemic and re -build our societies and econ omies. The faster we can scale up global vaccine supply, the faster we can contain the virus and end the pandemic. This therefore needs our concerted effort to work together in good faith to reach an agreement on the waiver proposal. We believe that the wa y forward is to remove barriers towards the development, production and approval of vaccines, therapeutics and other medical technologies necessary for the prevention, containment and treatment of COVID -19, so that more manufacturers, especially from devel oping countries, may independently contribute to the global supply. While we acknowledge that there are other key factors that will contribute to addressing the pandemic , such as access to technologies and productive capacities, we believe that the TRIPS w aiver is the first step. Timely conclusion of these discussions will lead us in the direction we are all moving towards - ramping up the global manufacturing capacity to address the dire supply shortage we are currently facing. I wish to reiterate that whi le conclusion of the discussions on this matter are stalled, we continue to record preventable deaths. As such , temporarily waiving relevant intellectual property will indeed demonstrate the important contribution that the WTO as a rule -based multilateral institution can make on this matter in the pandemic. 4.70. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 4.71. Pakistan would like to recall all its previous statements on this issue in the General Council and the TRIPS Council at its formal and informal sessions. With mortality officially crossing 4 million and real numbers estimated to be much higher, the situati on of the pandemic has worsened considerably. More lives are being lost to the new Delta variant at greater speed. At the same time, availability of vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics is also worsening. 76% of global vaccination has been carried out on ly in 10 countries and only 1% and 10% of the populations are vaccinated in Africa and Asia respectively. C OVAX , C-TAP and other facilities have fallen a long way short of expectations and desired results. In fact, it is astonishing to observe in recently presented data by an analytics firm, that of the much hyped 11 billion doses of vaccines that are to be available by the end of 2021, more than 10 billion have already been purchased mostly by the advanced countries; leaving less than 1 billion doses, only of the Chinese vaccine to be purchased by poor countries. A "shocking imbalance in distribution ", a "moral failure ", a "human catastrophe ", an "economically self-defeating " situation. These are a few of the many expressions used by the D irector -General of the WHO for the stark vaccine inequity across the globe. Cosponsors have indicated that we are open to all and even a combination of solutions that would help the efficient scaling up of production and provide equitable and affordable access to everyone. Each proposal must be evaluated on its merit. However, as we are witnessing, reliance merely on voluntary licenses cannot produce desired results. Also, due to the myriad problems associated with the grant of compulsory licenses in individual countries, an d the huge scale of the pandemic, that option also provides an improbable and grossly inadequate solution. While we appreciate the proposal by the E uropean Union for clarifications on compulsory licenses under the TRIPS Agreement, we find that the proposal alone, by itself , cannot address the enormity of the task at hand. Therefore, the TRIPS waiver proposal is a necessary component for saving precious lives and must be an integral part of any fight or response by this organi zation against the pandemic. We urge all Members to engage meaningfully and earnestly in text -based discussions with a view to improving the text and granting the waiver. 4.72. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 4.73. The European Union is strongly committed to achieving our common goal: to continue ramping up production, to share COVID -19 vaccines and medicines more widely and faster, and to ensure equitable access to these products for low - and middle -income countries. 4.74. The European Union is making every effort to fight the pandemic. The European Union is the biggest producer of mRNA vaccines and is therefore at the forefront of deliveries of vaccines to the rest of the world: so far, more than 500 million doses have been exported from the European U nion and similar amounts have been delivered to Europeans. 4.75. The European Union and its member States have also been the largest donor to the COVAX facility: EUR 3.2 billion have been committed to support the equitable distribution of vaccines. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 25 - 4.76. We already se e enormous progress in the total global production of COVID -19 vaccines: according to Airfinity, a billion doses were produced by 12 April, another billion were produced by 26 May and the third billion by 22 June. It is clear that production is acceleratin g, and it is therefore realistic to expect that some 10 billion doses will be produced by the end of 2021. By comparison, the total global output of all vaccines before COVID -19 was only 5 billion doses. 4.77. To support short -term actions for ramping up vaccin e production, the European Commission set up a vaccine task force in the E uropean Union whose objective is to match supply with demand and to lift bottlenecks. Its main tasks are to promote partnerships through matchmaking events. And this has brought tang ible results: we have seen that so far technology transfer is working well with a number of high -level partnerships announced recently. Fifty-three (53) EU manufacturing sites are already engaged in relation to COVID -19 vaccines, based on voluntary partner ships. 4.78. Important partnerships are forged also outside of the European Union. Just to give an example , recently Pfizer has signed a letter of intent with the South African company Biovac, to manufacture the Pfizer -BioNTech COVID -19 vaccine for distribution within Africa. Technology transfer, on -site development and equipment installation activities will begin immediately. It is expected that the facility will be brought into the supply chain by the end of this year. Biovac will obtain drug substance s from Bi oNTech 's facilities in Germany, and manufacturing of finished doses will commence in 2022. At full operational capacity, the annual production will exceed 100 million finished doses annually. All doses will exclusively be distributed to the fifty -five (55) Member States of the African Union. 4.79. Beyond the current crisis, it is also necessary to build resilience of the health systems in those countries which do not have their own manufacturing capacity and are overly reliant on imports. To this end, the Europea n Union and its member States are launching an initiative to develop vaccine production in the African continent , entailing investment in infrastructure and production capacities as well as skills development, supply chains management, and the necessary re gulatory framework in order to create conditions for technology transfer. The objective is to develop a number of regional hubs distributed across the African continent , and we have already identified promising projects in South Africa, Senegal and Rwanda. EUR 1 billion has already been allocated from the EU budget and the EU finance institutions to deliver on this goal. 4.80. On 9 July, the E uropean Union signed in Dakar a EUR 6.7 million grant in support of Institut Pasteur de Dakar, in Senegal, to produce the anti -COVID -19 vaccine by early 2022 with a production capacity of 300 million doses of vaccines per year. Rwanda is also receiving EU support to enhance its manufacturing capacities and strengthen regulatory frameworks. 4.81. These are only examples showing the range of efforts and actions that are taken – it is clear that the response must go beyond the matters related to trade. But trade may and should play a role in enhancing access to COVID -19 vaccines and medicines. 4.82. The in tense discussions in various fora have demonstrated that limited manufacturing capacity, restricted access to raw materials and other inputs as well as complex supply chains are the main bottlenecks as regards the production and distribution of COVID -19 va ccines. In addition, having the required know -how is key due to the complexity of the production process of these vaccines. Last week, the WTO published information on the bottlenecks regarding critical products to combat COVID -19 that confirms these findi ngs. 4.83. Trade -related measures, if agreed swiftly, could address some of the bottlenecks and make a real difference. We need to look into export restrictions, minimise barriers to trade and put forward trade -facilitation measures. We will further discuss thes e issues in a separate point of our agenda today. 4.84. Given the nature of the identified bottlenecks and the need for the sharing of know -how, the European Union does not believe that the proposed suspension of the TRIPS Agreement by the waiver proposed by Sou th Africa, India and a number of other WTO Members, is an appropriate and effective response. The proposed waiver will not increase production of COVID -19 vaccines and medicines, as it will not address any of the existing bottlenecks that have been identif ied. It rather risks having counterproductive effects on our common efforts to enhance access to such vaccines and medicines. In particular, it will undermine the ongoing collaborations, which are based on the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 26 - well-established platform of intellectual prop erty protection and will have a chilling effect on future such collaborations. 4.85. In addition, the waiver may have harmful effects going forward when it comes to fighting future pandemics , and more generally on incentives for research and innovation. The Euro pean Union has provided details on these risks in the discussions in the TRIPS Council. 4.86. The intellectual property system is not an obstacle to access COVID -19 vaccines and medicines. To the contrary, it has played a key role in the development of these pr oducts and can play an enabling role in deploying existing capacity or creating new capacity for the production of COVID -19 vaccines and medicines. The European Union believes that it is possible to enhance the role of the IP system while at the same time maintaining the protection required for incentivising technology transfer and investment in innovation, so that we can fight against new strains of COVID - 19 and any future diseases. It is to this end that the European Union has put forward an alternative proposal to the proposal on the waiver – the European Union proposal focuses on the clarification and facilitation of the use of compulsory licensing system. 4.87. The compulsory licensing system provides for tools that can be used in times of the pandemic to ove rcome potential IP -related obstacles . It also provides enough legislative space to apply the system in a swift manner. The proposal is meant to clear any doubts that may persist about the use of the system and to indicate ways in which the system can be us ed in a fast and simple manner that is fully adapted to the challenges of the pandemic. 4.88. We have proposed clarifications on the elements that we find most relevant for the situation of the pandemic, that is the fast -track procedure that omits negotiations w ith right holders; the support for manufacturers wishing to supply to low - and middle -income countries at discount prices; and the simple single notification to be made by the exporting country to speed up exports. We have also emphasized that the European Union remains open to discuss other aspects of the compulsory licensing system that merit clarification and facilitation. This discussion has already started in the TRIPS Council. 4.89. In our view, clarifications on the proposed aspects would provide the neces sary legal certainty to Members to intervene and swiftly grant compulsory licences including for purposes of export to countries that are lacking manufacturing capacity. Our approach would also promote production and supply of those products to low - and mi ddle-income countries at affordable prices, including via the COVAX Facility. 4.90. Given the stalemate we are experiencing in the TRIPS Council, we encourage all WTO Members to try to find convergence on the basis of the European Union proposal as the one that is pragmatic, targeted and effective in responding to the current needs , while keeping intact the necessary incentives for innovation. It is through the targeted approach proposed by the European Union that we believe we can advance in our discussions on the intellectual property element of the WTO response to the COVID -19 crisis and finally pave the way for advancing on the other parts of the needed comprehensive approach. 4.91. We are ready to discuss all the requirements of the compulsory licensing system, requirement by requirement, to see what issues there are, how they can be addressed and how we can make the system function. We thank all Members for their engagement on our p roposal and for their contributions, questions and thoughts on it so far. We have received valuable feedback and we are pleased to see the interest of various delegations on this approach. We look forward to our continued discussion and hope to be able to agree on an outcome in advance of the November Ministerial Conference. 4.92. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 4.93. As my delegation has reiterated on several occasions, Brazil wants meaningful, timely and comprehensive solutions that em power all Members in their response to the challenges we are currently facing. We are confident that, if we approach these negotiations with the necessary combination of flexibility, sense of urgency and pragmatism, we will be able to find common ground. You can count on our engagement to work to that end in the months ahead. We want to thank the DG for organizing, together with the Director -General of the WHO, the High -Level Dialogue on WT/GC/M/19 2 - 27 - "Expanding COVID -19 Vaccine Manufacturing to Promote Equitable Access" , held on 21 July. The event provided a useful stocktaking of prospects for vaccine production and distribution, with an enhanced focus on how we could promote equity. We invite all actors to continue to invest in this concerted effort to provide meaningfu l solutions to end the pandemic. 4.94. The representative of Norway provided the following statement: 4.95. Norway would like to thank the TRIPS Council Chair for his report. Norway welcomes the proponents ' revised proposal. We had, however, hoped that the revised pr oposal to a larger degree would have reflected the comments and concerns raised by many Members in our deliberations. Norway also welcomes the submission from the European Union as a valuable contribution to our deliberations on how the IP system can best contribute to our common objective. Norway would like to appeal to all parties to search for a common ground as a basis for a pragmatic compromise that can achieve consensus, and we look forward to continuing our deliberations within the framework of the TRIPS Council. 4.96. The representative of Afghanistan provided the following statement: 4.97. We welcome the revised proposed decision text and support it. The pandemic continues to affect society and the economy worldwide and has caused a massive human catastrophe. The pandemic 's effects on the health sector, especially in LDCs, are horrific. While some developed country Members are easing pandemic restrictions, many other countries, including Afghanistan, are experiencing a problematic situation and new phases of the pandemic. Aside from the impact of the virus itself, the secondary effects of the pandemic are continuing to hit communities that had not yet recovered from the previous waves. While we are thankful for receiving some COVID -19 vaccination do ses, based on the data from our capital, unfortunately, only 1.92 % of our population has received the vaccine. While we are happy that Members are moving closer to a text -based negotiation process to improve the international response to COVID -19 and achie ve the common goal of providing global equitable access to vaccines and other medical products, we are concern ed by the pace. Therefore, we urge all Members to consider the severity of this crisis, take a solution - finding approach, and move to text -based n egotiations soon. It is the proper time to put practical measures to ensure the availability and accessibility of affordable and timely vaccines and the required medical products to all worldwide Members to combat this pandemic. Finally, Afghanistan associ ates itself with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group. 4.98. The representative of Cabo Verde provided the following statement: 4.99. My delegation aligns itself with the statements delivered by Mauritius on behalf of the African Group and by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP Group . We support the statement made by our colleague from South Africa. Over the last few months, we have seen substantial progress in the number of vaccines distributed. However, the majority of those went to richer countries . Thanks to bilateral agreements with production companies, these countries have accumulated doses for their own populations and have left poorer countries aside. We all know that in order to stop this global pandemic, a global response is needed. The pand emic will not come to an end whilst significant reservoirs of the virus remain, and the world remains in danger given that new variants are emerging. The temporary waiver is essential if we are to avoid this pandemic. Some developing countries who have pro duction capacity should have access to the technology and the products to provide a generic version, which would reduce the cost of the vaccines and increase production. The appearance of new variants such as Delta add difficulties for countries with scarc e resources. As the Director -General of the WTO has declared, we are living in exceptional times and we need to overcome this challenge. We cannot repeat the painfulness of the first years following AIDS , where the richer countries had access to medication while millions in developing countries were dying because they had no treatment available. 4.100. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 4.101. Regrettably, the discussion was supposed to be in the context of a text -based process . Constant repeated question s have slowed down such text -based process, but of course we profoundly appreciate the constructive engagement made by all Members during the course of this discussion , guided skilfully by the Chair of the TRIPS Council. Indonesia would like to reiterate that for us the TRIPS waiver proposal is the WTO top priority at this moment. We consider this proposal WT/GC/M/19 2 - 28 - as a main element of the holistic WTO response to the COVID -19 pandemic. It is inevitable that we immediately pursue and conclud e the TRIPS waiver to address such obstacles and to scale up the production of all COVID -19 related health products and technology , to save people from the worsening pandemic. IP rights are not absolute, they are subject to public interest and such public interest exists now. The TRIPS waiver should be our way, the Members' way, to uphold public interest and the livelihood of so many. 4.102. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 4.103. We all recogni ze the scale of the challenge as t he pandemic continue s to rage in so much of the world and pa y tribute to the eloquent testimony to its human effects by South Africa and others. We all agree that our objective should be - to use the phraseology of the G7 at Carbis Bay - to vaccinate the world. The question is how. Sitting on the UK 's Vaccine Taskforce board last year, we faced many challenges in developing and deploying vaccines, including potential bottlenecks and the resilience of our supply chain s. IP was not the problem, nor is it. In fact, it is the IP regime that has enabled the extraordinary scientific advances of the last year, including the development of an unexpected number of safe and effective vaccines . Scaling up the production and deli very of vaccines has been at the heart of our G7 Presidency, including the commitment to share a billion doses within the next year and our national financial contribution to COVAX of £548 million (three quarters of a billion dollars) as well as our forthc oming sharing of doses through COVAX. We will continue to encourage voluntary licensing and technology transfer, support COVAX and look to identify solutions to production bottlenecks and weaknesses in the supply chain. In that respect , we very much welcom e efforts to bolster public/private and international collaboration in this area, such as the WTO-WHO Symposium last week, and also the new World Bank/COVAX financing mechanism. 4.104. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 4.105. Members s hare the objective of ensuring global, equitable and timely access to vaccines and medicines against COVID -19. However, they do not agree on the means to achieve this. Switzerland has been committed since the beginning of the pandemic to ensuring rapid and equitable access to health technologies, including vaccines. We do not consider a waiver of the TRIPS Agreement to be an effective way to rapidly increase the manufacture of vaccines against COVID -19. On the contrary, such a waiver risks undermining the e fforts of the more than 300 international partnerships that are currently working to build production capacity. These production partnerships are based on the international regulatory framework, of which the TRIPS Agreement is a key element. This is partic ularly true when it comes to the sharing of innovative technologies and know -how. Such sharing is a prerequisite for increasing the production of COVID -19 vaccines. Today, voluntary technology transfer is taking place on a considerable scale, as illustrate d by the manufacturing partnerships between Astra Zeneca and the Serum Institute of India, or the more recent partnership announced between Pfizer/Bio Ntech and the South African manufacturer Biovac. A waiver of the TRIPS Agreement would suspend the international regulatory framework for intellectual property. Existing production partnerships would face a legal vacuum. Such legal uncertainty could disrupt or even jeopardise ongoing partnerships to increase global production as quickly as possible. Intellectual property protection is not the problem, but part of the solution. This is the message that practitioners, women and men in the field - who toil day and night to keep complex production chains running - gave us at the 21 July symposium organi zed by the WTO and WHO. It also became clear at this event that supply problems and regulatory barriers were the main obstacles to the optimal functioning of production units. This is why Switzerland is actively involved in the work on trade and health in the W TO context. We support a holistic approach, which is the only way to solve the problems faced by supply chains. It goes without saying that international programmes such as the ACT Accelerator and COVAX also have a crucial role to play in the fight against the pandemic. On 28 April, Switzerland made available an additional CHF 300 million to support the ACT Accelerator, on top of the CHF 400 million already made available to support international pandemic initiatives. In addition, the Swiss Federal Council decided on 30 June to transfer 4 million doses of vaccine to the COVAX programme. Switzerland remains committed to continuing discussions on the proposals made in the context of the TRIPS Council, including those of the EU, in the hope of reaching a mutual ly acceptable outcome. 4.106. The representative of the Plurinational State of Bolivia provided the following statement: 4.107. We believe that we are extending the discussion , which is preventing us from achiev ing real results , while this is an urgent issue. The lack of agreement amongst Members undermines the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 29 - WTO's ability to act, particularly when the proposed extension and waiver has received large support around the world. It is clear that there is real inequality in terms of acce ss to vaccine, we have seen this in terms of death rates . The number of deaths around the world is up to 4 million , around the world and it is clear that we have an urgent need to increase production and diversify existing vaccines and medicines. This mean s lifting legal barriers to production , which come in the form of intellectual property law. We recognize that this is not the only obstacle, however it is the most significant one. The waiver is a necessary tool, a temporary tool , to lift intellectual pro perty barriers and allow to increase production. Bolivia would like to see a waiver which allows us to address urgent situations such as this one . This example is only showing the great inequalities in the current system , which cannot be addressed in the s hort term. We would urge all Members of the WTO to show real interest and political will to participate in the text -based negotiations without diverting or extending the discussions unnecessarily before the Ministerial Conference. 4.108. The representative of Eswatini provided the following statement: 4.109. My delegation aligns itself with the statement of the ACP Group and the Africa Group. The Kingdom of Eswatini is pleased that, while the initial proposal of the waiver was first introduced nine months ago, there is finally an agreement to advance this proposal to text -based negotiations. We welcome this move and we are also sensitive to the urgency of these negotiations to reach a solution to the catastrophic effects of the COVID -19 pandemic, especially in developing countries, where vaccine access continues to be elusive. We note with concern the continued inequality that has characterized the distribution of medical products including vaccines and therapeutics required to curb the pandemic, resulting in high mortali ty rates and loss of livelihoods. We cannot overemphasize the urgent need to ameliorate the current dire situation, in order to save lives and livelihoods. It is also clear that it is necessary to achieve herd immunity through vaccination globally , in orde r to prevent the COVID -19 from continuing to mutate, becoming more resistant to current vaccines and causing more periods of mass fatality. In the last few months, we have witnessed the virus continue to mutate into new variants. This means if there are large populations waiting to be vaccinated, the virus will continue to mutate and affect the poorer countries even more. The lack of access to medical products , including vaccines and therapeutics, will not just lead to more deaths, but will also cause a r aft of economic, social, and health effects, both in developing countries and to the rest of the world. This means we are not safe until we are all safe. Ensuring equitable access and distribution of the vaccine is in the interest of all. In this regard, w e urge that these text -based negotiations are done expeditiously, in good faith and in a transparent manner, with the aim of a results -oriented solution in order to save lives and livelihoods. We also urge that the negotiations not just focus on the supply and distribution of vaccines but also cover a range of COVID -19-related health products and technologies, including access to information on their materials and components and their methods and means of manufacture, as per the revised waiver proposal. 4.110. The representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statement: 4.111. We recall our previous statements and emphasize that the situation is extremely serious. What we are facing now is the urgent need to take an action . In this regard , we welco me the report of the TRIPS Council Chairman, Ambassador Sørli . We think his report is a useful and good bas is for us to continue our discussions. We urge all Members to cooperate and to show the necessary flexibility to provide timely and secure access to safe and affordable vaccines for all. 4.112. The representative of Cameroon provided the following statement: 4.113. We associate ourselves with the statements made by the African Group and the ACP Group and thank the Chair of the TRIPS Council for the quality of his report. There is no need for us to mention again the importance of finding a quick and consensual outcome to the proposal on the lifting of certain intellectual property rules for the purpose of facilitating the production of vaccines and pharmaceutica l products needed for combating the COVID -19 pandemic. We therefore invite all parties to actively engage in the search for concrete and effective solutions to overcome the various obstacles we are facing. We welcome the willingness shown so far, and stres s that only a quick and effective Council decision on this issue will provide solid evidence of our goodwill. The world is watching, and the threat posed by the emergence of new variants is right outside the door. There is merit in the development of innov ation and research, just as it makes sense to give appropriate consideration to commercial interests and investors ' rights. However, intellectual property and investment security aspects are not incompatible with common sense and cannot override the public interest. Only comprehensive medical coverage that meets the needs of all countries will enable this WT/GC/M/19 2 - 30 - pandemic to be tackled effectively. It is indeed necessary to show solidarity and that is why we welcome the COVAX facility and the multi -faceted donation s made to Cameroon and other states. Such donations are a gesture that reflect international solidarity and are necessary , but the question is whether they are sufficient to meet the needs of States. In its latest report, the WHO welcomes this surge of sol idarity, but expresses concern over existing disparities in access to vaccines. This is to underline the urgent need to include other mechanisms in the current framework of solidarity that can increase technical and technological access with a view to sign ificantly increasing the production of vaccines and other pharmaceutical products. Hence it is up to us to adopt a response that takes account of all possible approaches, limiting the pitfalls while making the most of the merits. We have no doubt regarding our capacity to do so. Let us show more determination and take resolute action in the consensus -based search for a pragmatic, effective solution that responds to the current emergency with an eye to any future pandemics. 4.114. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 4.115. To achieve equitable access to vaccines, our government co -hosted the COVAX AMC Summit with Gavi in June, and we have already pledged approximately USD 1 billion of financial resources to COVAX. In addition, Japan intends to provide around 30 million doses of vaccines manufactured in Japan to other countries and regions, including through the COVAX Facility. Japan will also make steady progress on our "Last One Mile Support " initiative to ensure vaccination is deliver ed down to the last person in the supply chain all over the world. We believe such a framework for multilateral cooperation is the most effective way to achieve timely, fair and equitable access to medical produc ts. With regard to technology transfer, we will encourage the voluntary transfer of vaccine production technologies on mutually agreed terms as per the APEC Economic Leaders ' Statement on 16 July. In this context, Japan supports the WTO Director -General 's continuous initiatives , such as promoting dialogues with pharmaceutical industries and pragmatic cooperation among capable manufacturers. We will engage in the discussion in various formats at the TRIPS Council, listening to the views of Members on how int ellectual property , including the existing TRIPS flexibilit ies, can contribute to achieving our common goal of providing timely, fair and equitable access to high - quality, safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines and medicines for all. 4.116. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 4.117. In light of the divergent views expressed by Members at the TRIPS Council , the deliberations on the proposals on the table need to be continued. IP -related issues at the TRIPS Council should be approached keeping in mind the need to explore the best pragmatic way to secure the increased production of and equitable access to vaccines in a timely manner at this urgent time of crisis. I also would like to reiterate that along with IP -related measure s, a broad based and holistic approach should be taken, such as encouraging technology transfer, facilitating the supply of raw materials and strengthening the operation of COVAX Facilities. For the COVAX Advanced Market Commitment, Korea plans to increase its contribution to USD 200 million over two years. 4.118. The representative of Singapore provided the following statement: 4.119. Allow me to make three points on this agenda item . First, like all WTO Members, Singapore continues to share the common objective of scaling up vaccine production and ensur ing its equitable distribution. In this context, Singapore fully supports the continuum consideration of all possible means to scale up vaccine production and distribution. Singapore has participated actively in the text-based process of the TRIPS waiver proposal and will continue to do so. However, the main challenges of increasing vaccine production and distribution remain complex and de mand a holistic approach. 4.120. Second, while Members share the same objective, there are serious differences in approaches. The fundamental difference voiced out and questioned of whether IP has been hindered to scal e up vaccine production a t the WTO -WHO High Level Dialogue on Expanding COVID -19 Vaccine Manufacturing to Promote Equitable Access last week, the unequivocal answer that we have heard from the ho rse's mouth was that IP has hindered production . The common refrain we heard from vaccine manufacturers i s that vaccine supply chain bottlenecks, lack of regulatory harmonization and export restrictions pose greater challenges. On the contrary, there was unanimity that IP has enabled vaccine developers to confidently invest in research and development , that enabled them to produce effective COVID -19 vaccines in record time. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 31 - 4.121. Third, it is time for Members to focus on the real question at hand, which is "how do we work together in a practical and pragmatic manner to scale up vaccine production and ensure more equitable distribution?" Taking reference again from the 21 July WTO -WHO High Level Dialogue , it is heartening to learn about Pfizer and BioNTech collaboration with the Biovac Institute in South Africa to manufacture and distribute COVID -19 vaccines. This co llaboration will involve technical transfer, on -site development and equipment installation activities to develop South Africa's manufacturing capability. Furthermore, all the vaccines produced will be for the 55 member states of the African Union. Another encouraging announcement from the same event was that Pfizer will produce 3 billion doses of vaccines by 2021 and up to 4 billion doses by 2022. Similarly, AstraZeneca said that it is on track to deliver 2 billion doses and Moderna will deliver between 80 0 million to 1 billion doses by the end of the year. What these developments clearly illustrate is that there are existing pathways and modalities to enable public -private partnerships and collaboration s that are capable of scaling -up vaccine production an d more importantly getting vaccines into the arms of as many people around the globe as possible. What WTO Members must do is to focus on taking the most practical and pragmatic steps to reach our common objective. 4.122. The representative of Fiji provided the following statement: 4.123. The first revision to the proposal in document IP/C/W/669/Rev .1 has the necessary ingredients to pave the way forward for the WTO to contribut e to the trade and health agenda. Despite the current roll out of COVID -19 vac cines, therapeutics and related tools, many gaps remain to be resolved. The COVAX Facility as we have noted is unable to deliver despite its initial plans , due to the production constraints and other restrictions in light of global demand. Above all, the v irus continues to mutate with the current Delta variant being more pernicious and replicat ing itself faster. We therefore should expect similar trend s in the future, whereby new variants will continue to mutate given the current trend of access delay . The critical way to address this dilemma is to ensure that all States have access to the vaccine and therapeutics as a starting point. Therefore, Members who have the capacity to produce should be equipped with the necessary tools and know how to do so. The wa iver of certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement in this pandemic time is therefore relevant and a step in the right direction. Every avenue must be explored to get people vaccinated in good time, both to save lives and to save our economies. 4.124. The representative of India provided the following statement: 4.125. While we continue our protracted deliberations on this proposal on a waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement , for the past ten months more than 4 million people have succumbed to this virus - these lives could have been saved had we agreed to the proposal and given it a chance. With less than 1% of vaccines administered in low -income nations, increasingly we see that a two -track pandemic developing, with countries having deep pockets having access to vaccines while poorer nations are being left behind. Each nations ' interests are entwined with that of the other, while developed countries have outpaced developing a nd LDCs in vaccinations and have also secured supplies for future doses, such a lopsided approach will only prolong the pandemic and exacerbate its aftereffects . 4.126. Members have argued that the waiver is not a response to enhancing supplies because the const raints are varied. They have repeatedly claimed that voluntary approaches will deliver. But the current situation clearly reveals that waiting for pharmaceutical companies to voluntarily license their know -how to manufacturers world over , to supply develop ing countries, including LDCs , has not delivered equitable access at affordable prices. There is, thus, an urgent need for the WTO Members to take action, to use existing tools for improving access. Limitations and shortcomings of voluntary approaches has already cost us many a lives and livelihood s and impacted economies, especially in the developing world. In the 21 July event, three areas were identified by D irector - General of the World Health Organization in order to increase manufacturing, and these were technology transfer, supply chain resilience and IP waiver. These are not areas that are mutually exclusive, because each area responds to a particular aspect of the crisis and therefore must be looked at independently and com prehensively. Even if we were to assume that as per some recent estimates that we could manufacture 11 billion doses by the year end, significant issues surrounding equitable access and affordability of these vaccines would continue to persist and would ne ed to be addressed. 4.127. The strength of economic recovery across countries is being driven by three key factors, namely, the extent of public health interventions including the vaccination programme, domestic WT/GC/M/19 2 - 32 - policy and government stimulus and the reliance of the economy on high contact sectors like tourism. Trade plays a key role in this recovery, and while global trade volumes saw a resurgence by April 2021, such recovery has been skewed with trade in goods leading the resurgence and services lagging behind. In the recent WTO Report, it has been highlighted that global services trade, that marked a decline of 21% last year, remained sluggish in the first quarter of 2021, falling 9% year - on-year owing to continued weakness in resumption of travel services amon g others. The continued uncertainty due to new variants and subsequent waves hitting various parts of the world, restrictions on movement of people, lack of retail spending, less consumer spending on services than goods, will continue to slow down the reco very and should be of concern to us all. This will continue to have devastating effect on small and vulnerable economies that are heavily reliant on services. 4.128. All Members reiterate their commitment to a shared objective of saving lives, and the need to ramp up global manufacturing, and with that goal and understanding, the cosponsors engaged during the text -based negotiations process. However, to our dismay , a few Members refuse to engage in the text -based negotiation. These few Members ensured that we are unable to meet the deadline set by the TRIPS Council Chair for reaching the necessary landing zone by end -July. While these Members emphasise the need for a comprehensive solution, it appears that the understanding of the term comprehensive is to be align ed with the priorities of these few Members. We continue to hear importance of a rules-based organi zation, what we are witnessing though is that the rules and procedures are conveniently and selectively interpreted. It would be worthwhile for Members to ponder over the kind of precedence these selective interpretations of rules are creating. The proposed waiver will enable the temporary suspension of the relevant TRIPS rules, providing manufacturers around the world the freedom to operate and scale up the production of vaccines. It is, thus, a necessary ingredient of a multi -pronged approach to combat the pandemic. The writing on the wall is clear, though we may choose to turn a blind eye. A differential approach to combat the pandemic will not only fail but also be counterproductive to the recovery. We must as an organi zation rise to the occasion and deliver, and save the people we are here to serve. Therefore, it is high time this organization prioritizes saving human lives and livelihoods over all other pr iorities. Needless to say , a decision on this critical proposal is absolutely crucial to the relevance of this organization in these trying times. 4.129. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 4.130. We are also aligned with the ACP statement under this agenda item. CARICOM recognizes that the COVID -19 pandemic is far from over. We are still counting the cost of the pandemic in lives, socio-economic dislocation, and the degradation of our health systems. If there was any doubt before regarding our interconnectedness, the COVID -19 pandemic has certainly put this to rest. As variants emerge and become "fitter and faster ", as one WHO expert has called it, it is clear th at no country is safe until all countries are safe. In this context, equitable access to preventative, containment and treatment methods for COVID -19 for all becomes even more critical. CARICOM takes note of the text-based process which is ongoing. We furt her take note that the TRIPS Council will continue its consideration of the revised waiver request, including through small -group consultations. 4.131. The representative of Niger provided the following statement: 4.132. In view of the developments and transformations relating to COVID -19 that we are seeing worldwide, we believe that all our discussions at the WTO on managing the pandemic crisis must be aimed at removing all obstacles to the mass production of vaccines, to the supply of raw materials and to access the technologies needed to respond adequately and effectively to humanity's urgent needs therein. In our opinion, it is necessary to create hubs for the production of vaccines, drugs and protective equipment in all corners of the world , to track the virus and its various mutations. This forms part of the view we championed at the general debate of the 74th World Health Assembly calling for an end to the current pandemic and the prevention of any future pandemic. Achieving the goals of herd immunity and balanced recovery are dependent on this, as are the goals of the Immunization Agenda 2030 of the World Hea lth Organization (WHO) as part of sustainable development of the United Nations (UN). Finally, we urge all Members to further reconcile their positions, so as to reach an appropriate political decision without delay to address the urgency and gravity of th e situation and allow safe access to vaccines for all and to uphold these ideals. 4.133. The Chair encourage d all delegations to remain positively engaged as text -based discussions continue d in the TRIPS Council, with a view to finding a solution that was accepta ble to all. He added that this was an important matter which require d willingness to listen to each other, understanding WT/GC/M/19 2 - 33 - and flexibility , thank ed the TRIPS Council Chair for his status report and noted that the TRIPS Council would report back to the Genera l Council , in line with Article IX:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement. 4.134. The General Council took note of the report of the TRIPS Council Chair and of the statements. 5 WORK PROGRAMME ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE – REPORT BY THE CHAIR6 5.1. The Chair recalled that a t the General Council meeting in December 2019, Members had adopted a Decision on the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, in which they had agreed to reinvigorate this work, including by holding structured discussions based on all trade -related topics of interest brought forward by Members. Members had also agreed to extend the moratorium and to report to Ministers at MC12. 5.2. In view of this ma ndate and the work that ha d taken place under the General Council and the bodies entrusted with the implementation of the Work Programme, he provide d Members with a comprehensive report. 5.3. The relevant bodies had last reported to the General Council in Dece mber 2020, except for the CTD that ha d not reported to the General Council since July 2019. 5.4. With respect to the Council for Trade in Goods, the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce had been considered at the two formal meetings held this year. Delegations had generally encouraged the reinvigoration of the Work Programme and reach ed a better understanding of the implications of the moratorium on electronic transmissions. Members had noted the importance of discussing the developmental aspects and implicatio ns of e -commerce, enabling LDCs to benefit from the opportunities provided by e -commerce, and bridging the digital divide. The CTG Chair would provide a more detailed report under his own responsibility at the end of the year. 5.5. The Council for Trade in Serv ices had considered the Work Programme at its meetings of 2 March and 1 July. A joint communication tabled in July 2020 on how Members were supporting digital capabilities of business and consumers, had continued to generate substantive engagement. Several Members had shared information about their programmes as well as recent domestic e-commerce related developments. At the March meeting, Members had appreciated the previous Chair's Overview Note on the information shared by delegations. 5.6. While welcoming t he exchange of information, a couple of delegations had called on Members to focus the discussion on the issues mandated by the Work Programme, including those related to the scope of the moratorium and the challenges faced by developing countries. In thei r view, the extension of the moratorium would be harmful to developing countries. They had added that the parallel JSI negotiations were detrimental to the multilateral trading system. On the other hand, several Members had noted the far-reaching benefits of the moratorium for both businesses and consumers. They underscored that the JSIs were inclusive, transparent and open to the participation of all Members. 5.7. In July, the LDC Group referred to the services elements of their communicat ion to the General Council. A couple of delegations had noted the challenges that developing countries faced in reaping the opportunities provided by the digital economy. They had underscored the importance of strengthening multilateral discussions under t he Work Programme, including through structured discussions. One delegation had called for the scope of the moratorium to be clarified and indicated that it had been working on a submission that would elaborate on the treatment of electronic commerce in th e GATS legal framework. 5.8. With regard to the Committee on Trade and Development, the Work Programme ha d been regularly placed on the agenda. Although there were no specific submissions to consider, some delegations ha d highlighted the importance of discussin g the development -related aspects of e - commerce. At the last CTD meeting held on 28 June, one delegation had indicated that it was working with other Members on a submission for the CTD's consideration. 6 The Chair said that if agreeable to delegations, he would take up both items 5 and 6 and then open the floor once on both items . WT/GC/M/19 2 - 34 - 5.9. With regard to the TRIPS Council, since the last rep ort to the General Council in December 2020, the Work Programme ha d not been discussed in the Council meetings. The Chair had been regularly reminding delegations of the Council's mandate in this regard. 5.10. He thank ed the Chairs and delegations for the work c arried out in their respective bodies. He noted that the level of engagement continue d to differ among th ose bodies. In line with the Member - driven nature of their work, he encourage d delegations to contribute to th ose discussions. 5.11. Regarding the e-commerce discussions under the auspices of the General Council , he recall ed that at the May General Council meeting he had reported on his consultations on the Work Programme and the moratorium. On that occasion, he had noted that despite well -known differences in Members' positions, delegations had confirmed their readiness to engage and deepen the discussions on e -commerce. Several delegati ons had also highlighted the need to have structured discussions to allow for more in -depth analysis, and to share experiences and expertise on specific issues. 5.12. It was in this context, and in light of the December 2019 General Council Decision, that he had convened a structured discussion on 5 July. The Discussion had been organized around 3 themes: electronic transmissions; imposition of internal non -discriminatory taxes on electronic transmissions ; and challenges and opportunities of e -commerce, pa rticularly in light of the COVID -19 pandemic. These themes had been based on what he had heard in his consultations. 5.13. Each session had been introduced by a few speakers, who had provided context and shared their national experiences. He thank ed once again all the presenters for providing very informative presentations , which were available on the WTO website. 5.14. Under the first session on electronic transmissions, the Secretariat had recalled the history and discussions held in the CTS and the CTG on this matt er. Members had reiterated their positions on the moratorium, with some calling for a permanent moratorium or at least an extension at MC12, and others seeking a common understanding on its scope first. 5.15. With regard to scope, some delegations had been of the view that the moratorium did not apply to content transmitted electronically and had been concerned about the broader implications of extending its scope. For others, the moratorium had applied to the content of the transmission, as well as the transmis sion itself. In their view, implying that the moratorium only applie d to the electronic transmission would render it meaningless. 5.16. Different views had also been expressed with regard to the impact of the moratorium on the growth of e -commerce, the wider economic benefits it provide d, and whether th ose benefits offset any potential revenue losses. 5.17. The second session on the imposition of internal non -discriminatory taxes on electronic transmissions had been organi zed in response to the request by som e delegations to hear more from those Members that impose d internal taxes, such as VAT and GST, on electronic transmissions. 5.18. He reiterate d that the sole purpose of the discussion had been to share information and that, as reiterated by some delegations, t axation remain ed an issue outside the WTO. Nonetheless, he believed that they had had an interesting exchange that had encouraged Members to raise some interesting questions and share their national experiences. 5.19. He noted that while some delegations had said that collection of internal taxes had helped address concerns about the loss of government revenue, others had noted that the issue of internal taxes was different from customs duties and that the possibility of imposing internal taxes did not compensat e for the loss of revenues nor for the policy space limitations. 5.20. Finally, the third session had focused on the challenges and opportunities faced with respect to e-commerce. 5.21. In general, delegations had acknowledged the role that e -commerce ha d played dur ing the pandemic and had recognized both the opportunities and challenges. Delegations had also WT/GC/M/19 2 - 35 - highlighted some specific issues of interest for discussion under the Work Programme, including the importance of addressing the digital divide. 5.22. The Chair hoped that Members had found th ose discussions useful. The idea had been to provide a platform for information -sharing without prejudging Members' final decision on the Work Programme and the Moratorium. Some delegations had requested the holding of further st ructured discussions. 5.23. Moving forward, it was clear that there were still very divergent views, especially on the moratorium. Nonetheless, the Chair was encouraged by the level of engagement that had been shown , midway through the year with only a few months remaining before MC12. 5.24. As noted at the beginning of his report, the General Council was to report to Ministers on the Work Programme on E -commerce and to decide on the moratorium. There was a need to start reflecting on what had been discussed thus far and to start thinking about the post summer work. While discussions continue , Members should delve deeper and focus attention towards a possible draft text for the consideration of Ministers. 5.25. The Chair further emphasise d the need to make some headway on this matter. Many delegations , if not all, ha d acknowledged how the pandemic ha d demonstrated the potential role of e-commerce in supporting economic recovery and, at the same time, how it ha d brought into the fore the existing challenges that were to be addressed. 5.26. Given the Member -driven nature of the work, any decision on the way forward with respect to both the moratorium and the Work Programme was in the hands of Members . He urged delegations to come forward with proposals on draft decisions - to start somewhere. They needed to be able to submit something to Ministers – a draft text as a basis for further consultations as they prepare d for MC12. 5.27. The Chair expressed his hope that all delegations would continue to pay attention to each other's views and that we can continue the work in a constructive manner. On his part, he intend ed to consult broadly with Members following the summer break and was ready to facilitate any further meeting or discussion as necessary, based on delegations' submissions. 5.28. The Chair concluded recalling his intention to consult broadly with Members after the summer break as they looked at MC12, and remain ed ready to facilit ate further discussions on the basis of Members' submissions. 5.29. The General Council took note of the Chair's report7. 6 WORK PROGRAMME ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND MORATORIUM ON IMPOSING CUSTOMS DUTIES ON ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSIONS – REQUEST FROM INDIA AND SOUTH AFRICA8 6.1. The Chair recalled that India and South Africa had requested that the item concerning the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce and Moratorium on Imposing Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions be included in the agenda of today's meeting. The item had also been included in the agenda of the March and May meeting, as well as previously in October and Decembe r 2020. 6.2. The representative of India provided the following statement: 6.3. The digital revolution is still unfolding. While digital infrastructure has played a critical role during the ongoing pandemic, it has also brought out clearly the existing and widening digital divide among Members, a divide exposed further during the COVID -19 crisis. Moreover, many of us are yet to fully comprehend the implications of e -commerce on competition and market structures; issues related to transfer of technology; data storage; automation and its impact on traditional jobs; and gaps in e -commerce policy and regulat ory frameworks in developing countries , including LDCs. That is why India has been a proponent of strengthening our multilateral work under the non - 7 The report was subsequently circulated in document JOB/GC/267. 8 See footnote 6. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 36 - negotiating and exploratory 1998 Work Programme on E-commerce. Under this multilateral Wor k Programme and with the intention of understanding the implications of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions, India along with South Africa has introduced submissions which explain our understanding of the scope and impact of the mo ratorium. 6.4. We believe it is important for Members to review the 1998 decision to have a moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions. We are all aware that this decision was taken with no consensus on the scope of the moratorium and no notion o n how the digital revolution would unfold. In December 2019, we had joined the consensus for a six-month extension of the moratorium, with an understanding that the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce will be reinvigorated, to achieve clarity on various issues, including the scope of the moratorium and its impact on Members ' policy space and revenues. Since then , due to repeated postponements of the 12th Ministerial Conference, the moratorium has got extended by about two years, that is much beyond six months initially agreed to in December 2019. However, we have not seen much progress in the discussions on the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce. During the coming few months before MC12, we need to engage constructively on various issues under the Wor k Programme. We also need to have a clear understanding on the scope of the moratorium, to enable us make an informed decision on an extension or otherwise of the moratorium in the upcoming Ministerial Conference . 6.5. As we have been repeatedly highlighting, a re-consideration of the moratorium is critical for developing countries, inter alia, to preserve policy space to regulate imports, generate revenue through a simple and direct instrument such as customs duties , and achieve digital industrialization. Some Members have opined that the moratorium has brought about significant benefits in terms of increasing digitalisation and development of the digital economy. We request the proponents of the moratorium to provide specific evidence that the development of th is sector depends on the moratorium and that its withdrawal will disrupt it. In our view, the cost of the moratorium is mainly borne by developing countries by extending duty free quota free market access, largely for the developed countries. We therefore need further discussions on this issue. 6.6. Multilateralism is vital in a world facing development challenges, and through constructive discussions on the Work Programme mandated multilaterally , the WTO has a unique opportunity to make a contribution towards an inclusive and development -oriented approach to electronic commerce. In this context, India along with South Africa, has also circulated a paper in document WT/GC/W/812, which seeks that this Council play s a central role in the discussions on the Work Programme , keep this item under regular review , take up any trade related issue of a cross -cutting nature , and continue structured thematic discussions in the General Council through various platforms. 6.7. Paragraph 1.2 of the Work Programme mandates that this Council shall play a central role in the whole process and keep the work programme under continuous review through a standing item on its agenda. We , accordingly, urge you to ensure that the Work Programme is kept as a standing agenda items for the meetings of this Council. We also need to ensure that, as mandate d under paragraphs 2 to 5 of the Work Programme, relevant WTO bodies do engage constructively and report to this Council on issues as signed to them under the Work Programme, including on the issue of challenges to and ways of enhancing the participation of developing countries in electronic commerce, in particular as exporters of electronically delivered products; the role of improved a ccess to infrastructure and transfer of technology, and of movement of natural persons; the use of information technology in the integration of developing countries in the multilateral trading system; the implications for developing countries of the possib le impact of electronic commerce on the traditional means of distribution of physical goods; and financial implications of electronic commerce for developing countries. 6.8. We are working with likeminded Members to introduce submissions in all relevant WTO bodies, to engage in constructive discussions on a non-negotiating basis. We also urge Members to constructively engage in discussions on the Work Programme, here in this Co uncil and in other relevant WTO bodies. 6.9. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement: 6.10. On item 5, t he structured discussion s held on 5 July served as a useful information -sharing exercise for Members to exchange views and experien ces on the issues relating to the moratorium WT/GC/M/19 2 - 37 - on electronic transmissions, particularly the challenges and opportunities of e -commerce in light of the COVID -19 pandemic. The Philippines attaches great importance to electronic commerce as it facilitates cros s-border trade and plays a critical role in the global post -pandemic recovery to boost economic growth. Therefore, we reiterate our commitment to reinvigorate the work under the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce and support the current practice of not imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions until the next Ministerial Conference. 6.11. We also believe the work on e -commerce, overall, can be pursued in parallel in the General Council structured discussions, as well as in the Joint Statement Initiat ive. The JSI discussions can complement the GC structured discussions to advance Members ' priorities on the area of electronic commerce. 6.12. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 6.13. Under item 5, d igital trade is growing rapidly, and its performance has become an important determinant of the distributional effects of trade, and growth. However, the existing North –South digital divide continues to undermine the gains of developing countries from glob al digital trade. Nigeria has been consistent in its call for the membership to reinvigorate the 1998 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce and explore ways of addressing the difficulties undermining the gains of developing countries from global digital tr ade. In this regard, we co -sponsored the Australian led proposal on exploratory discussions on supporting digital capability of business es and consumers in the CTS , which is gaining traction with more Members engaging in the discussions. Nigeria support s a more structured and targeted discussions on horizontal and vertical issues regarding the trade related aspect of e -commerce under the Work Programme , with a view to setting an inclusive and development -oriented agenda for consideration by Ministers at MC1 2. 6.14. Under item 6, r egarding the issue of the m oratorium on customs duties, we support the renewal of the moratorium at MC12. This is to forestall the disruption of the global e -commerce landscape and the negative effects on businesses and consumers that is likely to occur from the non-renewal of the Moratorium at MC12. The global economy is already shattered by COVID -19, and the WTO should be part of the recovery effort s. This is without prejudice to the call by some Members for broad based discussions on scope and definition , so we can gain greater insight and deepen our understanding of these issues. We are also mindful of the legitimate concerns of some Members on the effect of the moratorium on fiscal revenue. As stated at the last meeting of the General Council , we support the call by some Members for the four designated bodies under the Work Programme, to delve deeper into the benefits and costs of the moratorium on customs duties , especially for developing countries. However, such assessment should not only focus on the static effects, but also the dynamic effects so that we can be properly guided. In our view, an objective assessment of the impact of the moratorium on economies will reveal that the benefits associated with the dynamic effects of the moratorium outweighs the revenue loss. We therefore call on Members to support the renewal of the moratorium at MC 12. 6.15. The representative of Australia provided the following statement: 6.16. On this item, our views are well known. The idea that we would let the moratorium expire at one of the most significant points of transformation of the global economy would be very odd indeed and would add a serious blow to the WTO's credibility. We would like to see the moratorium returning and, of course, made permanent. 6.17. The representative of Thailand provided the following statement: 6.18. Thailand reassures all WTO Members that we recognize the importance of the 1998 Work Programme on E -commerce and remain committed to the General Council 's Decision of December 2019. In accordance with the decision, we have actively engaged in previous discussions, such as the virtual webinar and the open -ended meeting held in July last year, Australia' s initiative under the CTS meeting. In particular, at the most recent structured dis cussion on 5 July, we had a representative from Bangkok sharing the experience of our domestic practices, policies, pandemic challenges, and opportunities in terms of digital capability and development. To take this issue forward, we support the continuati on of the current practice of extending the e-commerce moratorium as well as the Work Programme at MC12. Apart from trade and health outcomes, this decision will offer another opportunity for the WTO to contribute to the global trade community by WT/GC/M/19 2 - 38 - providing a predictable business environment in current and post -pandemic situations, and ensure that after MC12 we will have a forum to discuss e-commerce in terms of development , and delve into issues important to developing members and LDCs. While it is undeniab ly beneficial for Members to consider how to improve our existing working structure under the Work Programme, we must also be careful not to duplicate our efforts or create overlapping mechanisms when deliberating our e-commerce -related works. 6.19. Our exports last month expanded 43.8% and the first 6 months of this year increased 20% . Even though last year's figure was very low, the total value of exports of Thailand is still growing. The main reason why we are still gradually growing is due to e-commerce, bot h in terms of imports from and exports to neighbouring countries and others, as well as our domestic development that has gained from e -commerce activities in Thailand. 6.20. For our export efforts, we have shifted a lot of activities towards online activities, such as online matching among importers and exporters between Thailand and trading partners, signing agreements virtually, starting many virtual exhibitions to showcase our products and services, and doing online audio -visual entertainment and services. E verything is moving towards online activities, and I believe that virtual e-commerce activities will become semi -permanent and an integral part of the world economy in the future. There is no reason why we need to put barriers to the growth of e-commerce r ight now and in the future. 6.21. On the domestic side, unfortunately, we are going t hrough another partial lockdown in many areas of the country. Many Thai people are now surviving because of the food delivery from grocery stores, and everything being delivere d to their homes , in particular elderly people . Livelihoods can be sustained through e-commerce activities. 6.22. While we understand the debate at the WTO concerning taxation and tariffs, we have to recognize that e-commerce could be an important factor on how we survive during a pandemic situation. E-commerce benefits many SMEs , since many of them are in the supply chain of food delivery – it is not only big companies that reap the benefits of e-commerce This is the answer to future global trade and domestic trade. It is in our interest to keep the online regime as open as possible. 6.23. Many members mentioned the digital divide. From our experience, currently it is not the problem of the digital divide that m akes countries not realize the benefits of e-commerce, rather it is a human development divide since e -commerce is a system and a technological network. If there are no people who can utilize it, then it means nothing. Thailand has been able to use e-comme rce a lot and much faster than in the past few years because of the focus on human resources development rather than talking about systems or networks. It is important that users get experience on how to utilize the system of modern technology and e -commer ce. At the same time, another kind of human development which is needed is entrepreneurial. Start -ups and SMEs need to understand how useful technology is to develop their businesses. Thailand is happy to share its experience on this. 6.24. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement: 6.25. At the last General Council meeting on 5 July on the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, my country presented its national experience with respect to the opportunities and challenges brought about by e -commerc e. This presentation illustrated the importance of e - commerce to Mexico, through its development of the digital economy, thereby enabling small and medium -sized enterprises (SMEs) to benefit from valuable business opportunities. The international legal framework of the trade agreements negotiated by Mexico also led to a significant increase in e-commerce operations during lockdown. My country considers that e -commerce has been able to grow beyond expectations thanks to the multilatera l commitment to not apply tariffs on electronic transmissions. Mexico therefore reiterates the importance of continuing the moratorium and is in favour of making it permanent. 6.26. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement: 6.27. Under item 5 , we consider the continuation of the Work Programme as essential , as well as the renewal of the moratorium until at least MC13. This will be this organization's contribution to WT/GC/M/19 2 - 39 - one of the most dynamic sectors of the world economy, which has also played a key role during the pandemic and will be even more relevant for the recovery of our economies in a post COVID -19 context. We believe that, after 23 years, the discussions should be about how to achieve a permanent moratorium and thereby ensure stable and n on-discriminatory conditions for the benefit of suppliers and consumers of all WTO Members. The current moratorium is in line with the objectives of the Marrakesh Agreement which, in its Preamble, calls for the reduction of trade barriers and the eliminati on of discriminatory treatment in international trade relations. In everything we do in this organization, and in particular on this issue, we should take these principles into account. 6.28. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 6.29. Under item 5, a s we live in a society where digital technologies play an increasingly important role, access to technology can no longer be treated as a luxury but a necessity. Indeed, the information age has revolutioni zed the way we live, the way we interact with each and the way we trade. Unfortunately, the African continent continues to suffer from the digital divide , and the fourth industrial revolution that other parts of the world are living may leave Africa behind. The pandemic further aggravated the situation and African economies could not adopt measures such as work from home, tele -schooling or e -commerce. It is, in our view, crucial at this stage that the WTO takes a leading role on the development aspects of e-commerce by harnessing institutional coherence and bridging the gaps towards addressing the digital divide. We must not limit ourselves to e -commerce facilitation, but more importantly, we must look at the real weaknesses that countries and regions are facing, such as, logistical limitations, lack of know -how and technology, information transfer and security issues, and cross -border transactions. 6.30. In this regard, we request that the 1998 Work Programme on E -commerce be quickly revived and reviewed to achieve the development goals of a modern and integrated society. As regard s the moratorium on electronic transmissions, the African Group is of the view that there is an urgent need to carefully assess the situation in light of the growing role of digital services. We would, therefore, request the Secretariat to consider preparing an objective and factual report about the impact of moratorium on Members ' econom ies. Only a comprehensive assessment would allow us to take an informed decision on whether the moratorium may or may not be extended. I also take this opportunity to thank the delegations of India and South Africa for the next item on the agenda that, int er-alia, highlights the importance of sincerely pursuing the work envisaged in the 1998 Work Programme on E -Commerce and the need for a comprehensive assessment of the moratorium. 6.31. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP, provided the following statement: 6.32. Under item 5, t he 1998 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce continues to be a critical aspect of the WTO 's current and future work. The ACP Group has been one of the main supporters for the reinvigoration of the 1998 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce and the structured discussions which were set out in the 2019 Decision. We have therefore, taken good note of the recent activities that have taken place and the proposed road ahead on the issue. While at the macro level we can concur that the COVID -19 pandemic has bolstered e -commerce and digital trade, there is evidence to suggest that such growth has not be en equal across all WTO Members. In fact, there is data to suggest that growth has been limited to a handful of WTO Members and there has indeed been a widening of the digital divide since the onset of the pandemic. 6.33. We were pleased to have been able to sh are some of the challenges that continue to plague our countries in terms of e -commerce as well as some of the opportunities that some ACP Members have been able to benefit from during the 5 July Structured Discussions. We would like to request that the ob servations which were made at the structural discussions be placed on the record of this meeting under this agenda item .9 We note and understand that the moratorium on customs duties does not prohibit internal duties and taxes. 6.34. Whilst our membership is d iverse and remain s open to exploring the landing zone on the moratorium on the imposition of customs duties on electronic transmissions, we feel that it is necessary to remind WTO Members that while we do recogni ze the opportunities, we also face challenge s concerning internal taxes on digital trade. We would like to mention here that we are 9 At the request of Jamaica, the statement delivered by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP Group at the 5 July 2021 Structured Discussions on E -Commerce is annexed to the minutes of this meeting. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 40 - finding that we must seek to examine a balance between our revenue requirements from internal taxes and where we have emerging exports of digitised products that could face discriminatory taxes in export markets and added costs our entrepreneurs and businesses, which are predominantly small and medium sized business. In the ACP regions , where Economic Partnership or other Agreements have been entered into, we committed to non -discriminatory treatment of digitally traded goods and services. We would like to suggest that the structured discussions of the Work Programme could take stock of the extent to which developing countries are party to such agreements with similar terms. The ACP Group is examining in detail the e -commerce -related challenges and opportunities confronting our countries and is of the view that there is scope for us to be nefit from more dedicated structured discussions before MC12. The Group will bring forward its ideas on the specific issues that could be covered in these sessions. For us, such issues extend beyond the moratorium on the imposition of customs duties on ele ctronic transmissions. 6.35. We recogni ze that we will need to renew the Work Programme at MC12 and that the discussions on this will need to start soon. The ACP Group continues to be a proponent of the exploratory discussions under the 1998 Work Programme and would therefore wish to be a part of any consultations on this issue. 6.36. Under item 6, w e agree with India and South Africa that there still is a need for greater clarity on the scope and definition of electronic transmissions and the impact that the morator ium has had on developing countries, particularly from a revenue perspective. We look forward to a resolution of the issues raised in this submission. 6.37. The representative of Chad on behalf of the LDC Group provided the following statement: 6.38. With regard s to item 5, as agreed at the extension in December 2019 , we must continue structured discussions in the framework of the 1998 Work Programme on the basis of Members ' propositions. The LDC Group submitted an i ntervention at th e Structured Discussions, which we would like to see included in the record of this meeting under this agenda item. 10 We would also like to draw Members' attention to the LDC Group's communication in the framework of the November 2019 Wor k Programme , document WT/GC/W/787 . We must adopt an empirical approach , with the idea not to simply reproduce what has already been performed elsewhere, as every country has its own advantages and comparative strength , but u ndertaking a needs assessment at a national level might aid us in better understanding where we should begin the deployment of a strategic reform programme on electronic commerce , which would of course leave no one behind. 6.39. With regards to item 6, the LDC Group is aware of the urgent nature of a decision on e - commerce , given that the current decision will expire at the next Ministerial Conference at the end of this year. The LDCs Group submission also addresses the interest of solving and bringing solutions to issues on customs duties on electronic transmission s, as raised in the India and South Africa submission. More specifically, LDCs are also interested to see how a solution to the issu es raised in our paper can be provided. In addition, the LDC Group in its communication stated that a lack of clarity on the nature of electronic transmissions and the ability of LDC Members to apply internal taxes , with regard to customs duties if necessa ry, is one of its major concerns. We believe that this aspect and other aspects of the Work Programme , such as localisation and appropriate regulation for the protection of data and consumers , are essential. All the same , we must be equally clear on how we deliberate under the framework of this Work Programme so that LDC businesspeople and their domestic markets can make best use of their own data and exploit them on their electronic commerce platforms. 6.40. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICO M, provided the following statement: 6.41. Under items 5 and 6, CARICOM aligns with the views of the ACP Group on these items. We take this opportunity to underscore the importance the Work Programme holds for the CARICOM Group and to underline our commitment to its reinvigoration. As the General Council prepares to report to Ministers at MC12, we are pleased that we were able to proceed to structured discussions earlier this month. We note that the topics selected for the discussion reflected e lements identified by Members during your consultations. The sessions proved pertinent and timely, both in their examination of the considerations of the membership on electronic commerce over the last two 10 At the request of Chad, the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group at the 5 July 2021 Structured Discussions on E -Commerce is annexed to the Minutes of this meeting. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 41 - decades , and in respect of insights shared on Memb ers' current challenges and approaches related to electronic commerce. 6.42. Regarding the latter, the CARICOM Group is appreciative of the opportunity during the Structured Discussion on 5 July to provide details on how CARICOM Member States have sought to treat with e -commerce related challenges and opportunities in the context of the COVID -19 pandemic. The various elements outlined in our presentation, including in respect of digital infrastructure, the nexus between financial inclusion and digital inclusion, the rural digital divide and digital payment solutions, are among a substantial list of topics we understand to be relevant to a broad cross -section of WTO Members. In reiterating the view that our structured discussions should place emphasis on the devel opment dimension, we look forward to an engagement on these and other trade -related topics brought forward by Members, both in the lead -up to MC12 and beyond. 6.43. On MC12, we are mindful of the limited time between the end of the summer break and the start of the Conference in late November. We are also cognisant of the considerable amount of work to be done in preparation of outcomes on trade and health, agriculture and other priorities identified by the membership. In addition, what is clear is that our dial ogue on the moratorium since MC11 has not yet yielded the desired clarity or consensus. In the circumstances, structured discussions after the summer break must include focused dialogue on the moratorium, with a view to outlining a mutually agreeable recom mendation for consideration by Ministers at MC12. It would also be useful if Ministers could be positioned at MC12 to provide a meaningful direction regarding a reinvigorated Work Programme for the period after the Ministerial Conference. This is particula rly important in the context of the COVID -19 pandemic, and as the membership looks ahead to a post-pandemic recovery. It is evident that trade is becoming increasingly digital, and that electronic commerce will play a critical role in post -pandemic recover y efforts. 6.44. The representative of Zimbabwe provided the following statement: 6.45. We align ourselves with the statement delivered by Mauritius on behalf of the Africa n Group. The delegation of Zimbabwe wishes to underscore the importance of re -invigorating the mandated work under the 1998 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce. The COVID -19 pandemic has accelerated the digital transformation of the global economy and has made it clear that we need to build capacity in the use of digital tools and to prioritise the development of digital infrastructure. It is imperative for Members to address the digital divide both within and among countries. The Work Programme provides a suitable foundation for Members to explore the policy -solutions required and to discuss their implications. We therefore call for a collective and constructive engagement to discuss the Work Programme with an emphasis on digital development and inclusion. 6.46. Under i tem 6, regarding the e -commerce moratorium , we believe it is important to bring clarity with regard to the scope of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions, its potential impact on the sustainability of the domestic industry a s well as its negative impact on job creation, and on revenue generation. In this regard, we also repeat our call for Members to adopt an evidence -based approach as they consider the future status of the 1998 moratorium. 6.47. The representative of Uganda provid ed the following statement: 6.48. We agreed in 2019 to reinvigorate the Work Program on E-commerce and continue the practice of not imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions until the next Ministerial Conference which we had hoped to hold in 2020. Hav ing missed this opportunity, it is expected that our Ministers will revisit this matter at MC12. However, as we head to this date, many questions regarding various elements on e -commerce envisaged in the Work Programme that need to be clarified remain outs tanding. Issues of the technological neutrality principle, classification of new services, jurisdictional issues in terms of the law applicable , as well as issues related to the transposition of GATS commitments in market access in a digitized trade context , among others , are yet to be resolved. The impact of the COVID -19 pandemic has continued to reveal the critical role of the digital economy in dealing with the pandemic and in recovery efforts. The LDC Group has in the past presented many of the challenges that we face in making use of the opportunities of e-commerce , including the lack of mechanisms to start enterprises in e -commerce business, limited existence of and affordable ICT infrastructure , such as internet and electricity , coupled with challenges related to access to credit cards. It is important that we utilize any remain ing time before MC12 to delve in discussions of these and other i ssues in the relevant bodies. We thank South Africa WT/GC/M/19 2 - 42 - and India for their communications regarding the moratorium on the imposition of customs duties on electronic transmissions. My delegation continues to critically consider this matter. 6.49. The representative of Morocco provided the following statement: 6.50. The COVID -19 pandemic has confirmed the pivotal role that e -commerce currently plays in international trade, as has been underscored in the information note that the Secretariat published last March. However, n umerous major challenges are still faced by all of us if we are to ensure that e-commerce is a synonym of prosperity and development for all. I would also like to recall that Morocco had planned to schedule a conference for the African Trade Ministers dedicated to e - commerce in Rabat on 17 March 2020, which was unfortunately postponed for reasons which we are all familiar with. However, I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate my country 's intention to reschedule the conference when circumstan ces allow. In light of all of this, we should double our efforts to bridge the digital divide within countries and between them , through technical assistance and targeted technology transfer in such a way that we can integrate developing countries into global value chains and create wealth and resilience to see the issues from the same perspective and take inclusive and balanced decisions. The 1998 Work Programme should find new impetus and be strengthened so that all the pending issues can be remedied. 6.51. The representative of Nepal provided the following statement: 6.52. Under items 5 and 6, I would like to refer to the views Nepal shared in detail during your consultation with my delegation on 13 April , and to associate with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDC group. In the wake of the pandemic, we are compelled to go digital in order to survive in global trade. However, due to the huge digital divide among and within the Members, LDCs and LLDCs have not been able to harness the potential benefits of e -commerce. Insufficient ICT infrastructure, and weak institutional and human capacity are their main obstacles to participate in and b enefit from e -commerce. Needful intervention has become urgent through the E-commerce Work Programme to enable LDCs and LLDCs to participate in global trade. Some important initiatives that can be undertaken to overcome their capacity constraints in e -comm erce include widespread access to telecommunications at low prices and with latest technology; strengthening human, institutional and technical infrastructure; capacity -building in information technology; and promoting technology transfer and foreign direc t investment. In addition, the Work Programme on E-commerce should be delinked from the Joint Statement Initiatives on E-commerce. Efforts should be advanced without further delay to deliver on the mandate and ensure a fair participation of LDCs and LLDCs in e-commerce. Regarding the issue of the moratorium, clarity on the scope of the moratorium is absolutely necessary. Finally, implications of a continued moratorium should be assessed before taking any decision on it. 6.53. The representative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 6.54. Under item 6, a s we mentioned in the past, the moratorium on imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions was adopted in 1998 , when most of the Members , including Tanzania, were not aware of its implications. There was no clarity regarding how the economy would be transformed by digital advancements. Nevertheless, the measure was meant to be temporary. Currently, digital economy is growing rapidly. We are witnessing the volu me of trade of digitized products such as films, printable materials e.g . electronic books, video games, software, sound and music , growing at a radical rate. With the introduction of new technologies such as 3D printing, big data and artificial intelligen ce, our economies will further be transformed. Trading of digitized products is becoming one of the areas with high potential as a source of revenue collection especially for developing countries , like the United Republic of Tanzania. Tariffs remain the ma in source of revenue to support development in most developing countries and also can be used as a policy instrument to protect infant industries from stiff competition. In our view, digitized products and physical products should be treated the same way, considering that most of them are not new products but being converted from physical to digital forms. In this regard, my delegation supports the call for review of the moratorium, in order to give Members an opportunity to assess its implication s, and als o redefine its scope of application. 6.55. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 43 - 6.56. My delegation endorses the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDCs. The Work Program on Electronic Commerce (WT/L/274) is very relevant. In fact, the COVID -19 pandemic has further validated the significance of reinvigorating it. I would like to refer to our statement delivered at the G eneral Council meeting in March 2021. We suggest a temporary moratoriu m on e -commerce. 6.57. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 6.58. The European Union would like to underline that the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions provides the predictability and security that our con sumers and businesses – in both developed and developing countries – need when engaging or planning to engage in e - commerce. We would also like to recall that several recent economic studies have provided solid new evidence on the positive economic implica tions of the moratorium. The European Union remains committed to continue engaging in structured discussions on the moratorium in line with the General Council Decision of December 2019, taking into account the new evidence that has been published over the last couple of years , on the multiple benefits of the moratorium for businesses and citizens alike. While Members had decided to extend the moratorium until MC12, the European Union hopes that our Ministers will be in a position to consider a longer term – if not permanent – extension at the next Ministerial Conference. 6.59. The representative of Chile provid ed the following statement: 6.60. The Structured Discussion that took place on 5 July was highly useful for refreshing our memory regarding the discussions on electronic transmissions that have taken place in this organization, hearing about some Members ' experience in relation to the imposition of internal non - discriminatory taxes on electronic transmissions and learning from the experiences of various Members, especially developing Members, with respect to the challenges and opportunities presented by e -comme rce, particularly in the context of the pandemic. While we very much appreciate the information shared in this and previous activities, we regret that it is not leading to a narrowing of gaps between existing positions and that it does not appear to us tha t such a narrowing will occur in the few months that remain before the Ministerial Conference. To be convinced of the benefits of the moratorium, it is necessary to be open to being convinced. Against this backdrop, the focus should now be on negotiating, covering all elements linked to and going beyond the Work Programme and the moratorium. We call on all Members to engage in these negotiations in good faith, so as to achieve an outcome that leads to progress – much needed by our organization – rather than to a regression. Turning to the proposal to include the Work Programme and the moratorium as standing items on the agenda of this Council and other WTO bodies, we reiterate our call to avoid creating new unnecessary fora and to ma ke use instead of those that already exist to hold discussions based on concrete and substantive proposals. Lastly, our experience has shown the benefits of continuing the moratorium and we are looking for its permanent extension or, failing that, its exte nsion for a set duration of time, as has been done to date. We also reiterate our support for the renewal of the moratorium on TRIPS non violation and situation complaints. 6.61. The representative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 6.62. My statemen t is in relation to agenda items 5 and 6. On the Structured Discussion under the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce on 5 July 2021 , the informative presentations by the Secretariat and Members formed a good basis for further discussion in the future on electronic transmission in accordance , with the December 2019 G eneral Council Decision (WT/L/1079). We certainly are aware that the classification of electronic transmissions is an issue not to be resolved overnight. In addition, we were pleased to hear the report under agenda item 2 about the discussions in the relevant WTO bodies on the Work Program on Electronic Commerce. We believe that the sharing of practical experience and information among Members is also promoting related work and bridging the digital divide. In response to the request from India and South Africa, we are of the view that the priority and focu s, at this stage , should be to maintain the 22 -year-old practice of not imposing customs duties on cross -border electronic transmissions, including the content transmitted. From the overall economic perspective, the significant benefit from the moratorium to SMEs and MSMEs and to the growth of the global ICT sector and digital economy , has been self - evident. Facing the current pandemic, it is key for the WTO to secure an extension of the moratorium at MC12, or even consider mak ing it permanent. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 44 - 6.63. The represen tative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 6.64. Digitalisation is one of the great features of the modern age. It has been hastened by the pandemic. Digitalisation is a good thing for developing and developed countries alike. Many examples have been cited of countries who have been helped to integrate into the global economy and pull themselves out of poverty through digitalisation. We are a very strong supporter of the work programme on e -commerce and recogni ze the importance of inclusive d igital trade. We welcome recent structured discussions held by the G eneral Council Chair and support constructive, open and inclusive discussions. Let me echo the comments of Australia and the European Union. It would be inconceivable to do anything other than extend or render permanent the moratorium. To do otherwise would be bizarre. 6.65. The representative of Norway provided the following statement: 6.66. Under item 6, Norway agrees that it is important to continue our dialogue on the relationship between development and e -commerce, and we are looking forward to continuing discussions under the Work Programme. Norway continues to support the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions. The moratorium has created predictability for consumers, businesses, domestic regulators, and customs authorities. Creating more uncertainty should not be the purpose of this organization. 6.67. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 6.68. The moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions has supported the rapid growth of digital trade over the past two decades, and the United States continues to believe that WTO Members should be ready to agree to a permanent moratorium. The Stru ctured Discussions of the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce held on 5 July only underscored the importance of continuing the moratorium, as both developed and developing countries increase their reliance on digital tools during the pandemic response an d recovery. Ending the moratorium at this critical time would create uncertainty and concern for consumers and businesses, particularly MSMEs. 6.69. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 6.70. Under item 5, Japan believes that the moratorium h as provided certainty and predictability in digital trade for both consumers and businesses, including MSMEs. As such, it has underpinned the development of digital trade globally. Particularly under the current C OVID -19 pandemic, it is important to ensure a sound and liberalized environment through e -commerce and to support safe or less -risky socio -economic activities. To discontinue the moratorium at MC12 would be considered a serious step backward not only for e -commerce but for the multilateral trading system. This is true, particularly at the time of a pandemic, Japan strongly believes that we should maintain our current multilateral practice of the moratorium at MC12, and make it permanent eventually. 6.71. The representative of Vanuatu , on behalf of the Pacific Group , provided the following statement : 6.72. On Agenda items 5 and 6, e-commerce has grown significantly in recent years and more particularly in response to the COVID -19 pandemic as businesses adapt to lockdowns around the world. The Pacific Group se es e-commerce as both providing potential opportunities to harness our trade and to build resilience to external shocks. However, many developing countries including our Group were not able to take advantage of these online opportunities due to various cha llenges. These included weak infrastructure, limited skills, low levels of access to the internet and high connectivity costs. The Pacific Group therefore considers the Work Program me on e-commerce as an important platform to help us address the digital di vide faced by small vulnerable economies like ours. In this connection , the Pacific Group supports the re -invigoration of the Work Program me on e-commerce as agreed to by the General Council in December 2019, which also called on structured discussions on the Work Program me and the moratorium , including its revenue impact. We therefore support the call for you, as Chair, to facilitate structured discussions on this issue in preparation for MC12. 6.73. The representative of Switzerland provided the following state ment: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 45 - 6.74. The 5 July Structured Discussions allowed for interesting exchanges on different aspects of the moratorium. Switzerland considers the tariff moratorium on electronic transmissions to be a cornerstone for the development of the digital economy and trade. For t his reason, we are pleased to signal our willingness to make the moratorium permanent at the 12th Ministerial Conference. Switzerland's position on the other aspects discussed under this agenda item is known and has already been recorded in the minutes of the General Council. 6.75. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 6.76. The e-commerce JSI is a complementary way to move forward with the work of creating rules that support a transparent and stable e -commerce environment for all. We encourage more Members to join the negotiation s on the e-commerce JSI. Regarding the moratorium, Korea reiterates its firm support for the permanent extension of moratorium for the sake of certainty, predictability and security. Whi le appreciating your efforts to lead the structured discussion on the moratorium, I would like to stress that the importance of the role of E -commerce and the moratorium is getting more evident as we move toward the post -pandemic digital era. As regards co ncerns over potential revenue losses, it would be useful to note, as you mentioned, that internal non -discriminatory taxes could supplement any customs revenue losses the moratorium may incur. 6.77. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 6.78. We associate ourselves with the statement by the Africa Group and the ACP Group . South Africa supports the continuation of Structured Discussions in the General Council , which should include , among others: the developmen tal aspects of electronic commerce; the scope, definition and impact of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions; and an examination of the challenges experienced by developing countries and in relation to electronic commerce , and explo re ways of enhancing the participation of developing countries in electronic commerce. 6.79. The pandemic has highlighted the enormous gap in access to digital technologies. It has laid bare the problems of digital divide both between and within countries. Tech nology is critical for achieving all the SDGs, but to fully harness its potential, rapid action is needed to close the digital divide and promote inclusion. The issues entailed in the Work Programme remain critical to achieve this objective. It remains South Africa' s view that it is only through a truly multilateral process that issues identified by Members under the Work Programme such as classification, definition and scope can be clarified to enable a common understanding on e -commerce. It is regrettable to see lack of commitment to the developmental aspects of the WTO mandated work , and we are concerned that this is increasingly contributing to a lack of progress in the WTO. We caution that attempts to expand the definition of electronic transmissions will have significant revenue and industrialisation implications for developing countries. It substantially increases the trade coverage of the moratorium by multiples and has implications for the current obligations of Members under GATS. The magnitude of this can be inferred from UNCTAD (June 2020 -Research Paper 47) estimates that show that total imports of services via Mode 1 amounted to USD 705 billion in 2017 while total imports of digitizable products were around USD 80 billion in 2017. The UNCTAD Paper also estimates potential losses from the moratorium to up to USD 10 billion per annum for developing countries and only USD 289 million in losses for advanced economies. These forgone revenues to developing countries are set to exponentially increase with the increasing digitization of goods, including advances in 3D printing technologies. This is even more concerning as Members are considering policy tools that will drive economic recovery efforts. Suggestions that revenue losses can be evene d out by internal taxes or compensated for by dynamic gains , ignores the principal purpose of customs duties as an industrial policy tool that can and indeed should also be deployed to foster the development of local digital economies. 6.80. While we note the g rowth of e -commerce, especially during the COVID -19 pandemic, it is also indisputable that its benefits are highly uneven with high levels of concentration that also affect the benefits MSMEs can derive from e -commerce. The Work Programme is designed to ad opt a comprehensive and holistic approach to e -commerce to ensure equitable benefits for all. The reinvigoration of the Work Programme is therefore critical , given our interest on the development dimension of the longstanding area of work in the multilater al framework of the WTO, including digital industrialization and the need to address the digital divide. We believe that structured discussions on the scope and definition of electronic transmissions is required in order for us to appreciate the real impac t of the moratorium on customs duties given the different views of Members. The lack of clarity results in attempts to expand the definition of electronic transmissions . WT/GC/M/19 2 - 46 - The broadening of the scope to include all goods and services covered under GATS Mode 1 drastically encroaches on the policy space and flexibility of developing countries to regulate importation of services. Even more concerning, especially for developing countries and LDCs in particular, is that the expansion of the definition encompasses more and more traded products are subjected to the moratorium on customs duties on e -commerce, with significant implications on revenue collection, industrialization, and broadly the economy and jobs. The absence of a shared and common understanding on the scope and definition of electronic transmissions will make a decision on the extension of the moratorium a challenge at MC12. We must reinvigorate the Work Programme so as to remedy the unsustainable inequities and broaden the benefits from growing e -comm erce. 6.81. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 6.82. I would like to reiterate that our long -standing position on this issue remains unchanged . While attaching great importance to the development of e -commerce , the WTO should also focu s its work on the developmental aspect of the sector. Hence, Indonesia fully supports the reinvigoration of the multilaterally agreed 1998 Work Programme on e -commerce. It is important to complete work clarifying what is the impact of electronic transmissi ons and the moratorium on customs duties. 6.83. The representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement: 6.84. My intervention intends to touch on both agenda items. Sri Lanka attaches great importance to the Work Programme on E-commerce , which has now gained more importance in the digital revolution. It should be used to examin e the implications of digital rules fo r developing countries and discuss the best bridge for the growing digital divide. Key for the reinvigoration of the programme as Members prepare for MC12 and beyond , is the scheduling of structured discussions over the few coming months. 6.85. On the WTO e -commerce moratorium, it is extremely important for developing countries to know what the scope of the moratorium is and what is covered within the definition of electronic transmissions , which was not well-known at the time of ad opting this Decision in 1998. The goal post has been continuously shifting for developing countries . Electronic transmissions were first defined as digitizable goods , which covered five categories . The question on the definition of the moratorium arises because why should exporters of t hese digitizable goods not face customs duties , when micro, small and medium enterprises face custom duties on the export of physical goods. We should be able to impose custom duties on the content of the electronic transmissions , which constitutes the highest value of the electronically transmitted e -commerce products . This can generate a sizable tax revenue and provide a level playing field for local developers of similarly electronically transmitted e-commerce products. Countrie s are also losing valuable tariffs revenue especially in these times of COVID -19, and they can always unilaterally reduce custom duties to zero on software if they want. This is a policy space which we wish to retain. It is therefore important to remove th e moratorium on e-commerce and de -link it from the TRIPS moratorium. 6.86. Through the presentations at the event organized on 5 July, in terms of the different mechanisms established by countries for the recovery of non -discriminatory taxes , which is called internal taxes on digital goods and services, the countries are able to categorize digital goods and services based on their own interests , while compounding the content and bits and b ytes of the electronic transmission. Also, internal tax recovery mechanism can be easily replicated for the purposes of covering even custom duties . If we are to do so , the moratorium finally disappears from the WTO's context. This revelation is very important as we know that many countries favour continuation of the moratorium advocat ing that it is not feasible to recover custom duties on electronic transmissions , and that we should agree on a permanent moratorium. 6.87. On agenda item 6, Sri Lanka supports the concerns of South Africa and India on the Joint Statement Initiative on E-commerce. The legal standing o f the JSI on e -commerce in the WTO is questionable and there is no consensus on initiating any negotiations on e -commerce in the WTO. The JSI is also challengeable on the grounds that it may go against the basic principles of the WTO, as it may require developing countries to take mandatory commitments in GATS. The digital rules that are being negotiated are not particularly favourable for developing countries like mine which are still struggling to put the ICT infrastructure in place. Countries like Sri Lanka need policy and fiscal space in the digital economy so that they can develop their digital competencies in their own space and provide a level playing field to their infant digital sectors. It is therefore extremely WT/GC/M/19 2 - 47 - important to reinvigorate the Work Programme on e -commerce, and Sri Lanka has high expectations for MC12. It is important that WTO Members share their know -how to bridge the digital divide and facilitate digital technology transfers. Sri Lanka stands ready to engage meaningfully and constructively towards the collaborative formulation of the mutually agreeable recommendation on the moratorium for the consideration of Ministers in MC12 , and needs assurances from Members , particularly the ones who are ready t o address the concerns of developing countries. 6.88. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 6.89. Brazil supports the extension of the moratorium for two reasons. The more obvious, immediate one is that we do not want bad news in this organi zation. We can survive a standstill , but a rollback would be too much regarding the credibility of the WTO. We have heard a lot about the digital divide and the development dimension , those are fundamental concepts. The digital divide is a reality and needs to be overcome. The development dimension is at the essence of what we do, that is why we need trade. It is puzzling to imagin e that we are going to overcome the digital divide by creating a new barrier. It seems counter sensical. It is explainable in the light of 19th century economic theory, but I think one hundred years of economic history has proven this to be flawed. If we want to move ahead, it is time to integrate, to grow tog ether, to benefit from the dynamic sectors of the economy , not to shield ourselves away. 6.90. The representative of Singapore provided the following statement: 6.91. Singapore's consistent position on agenda item 6 has been well articulated many times so in a depart ure for my usual three points I will just make one point : to reiterate that Singapore strongly supports the renewal of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions. Adding trade barriers to digital trade at this point in time when e -commerc e is driving the post -pandemic recovery will inevitably send a very wrong signal to the business and industry , but particularly the medium, small and micro enterprises who have relied on digital platforms for survival during these difficult times. 6.92. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 6.93. Pakistan is strongly of the view that the General Council must fulfil its mandate to reinvigorate the structured discussions on various aspects of electronic commerce. It is extremely important that we find solutions for developing Members to basic issues such as the digital divide, technology transfer, and the effective utilisation of digital raw material to advance digital development in those countries. Structured discussions must be carried out within the various Councils and Committees mandated to do s o on all relevant aspects. Pakistan, like many other developing countries , has been making efforts to propel the discussions forward in these mandated bodies, and we would like to urge the membership to engage in earnest and meaningfully in these discussio ns. These bodies are the correct and relevant forum for this discussion under the WTO and provide an effective way for a multilateral fulfilment of our mandate. The moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions is one of the key issues represent ing a realisation of new realities for a new WTO and a new move towards meaningful development in our countries. The issue has been under discussion for some time now, and Pakistan has been consistent in its view that a fundamental reassessment of the situ ation is required due to new technological developments and emerging realities in the digital realm. Technology, especially in the digital age, is a powerful enabler. At present, developing countries lag far behind advanced countries in their access to and utilisation of modern digital technologies. At the same time, while acquiring technological capabilities, developing countries remain cognizant of serious revenue and industrial implications arising from digital advancements such as Artificial Intelligenc e and 3 -D printing. The temporary nature of the moratorium allows us the important space to move forward only after a conclusive re -examination on the implications of such developments and the moratorium. We also understand that the removal of the moratori um does not automatically impose duties, but only allows Members the right to do so – if and when they deem it appropriate. Therefore, before any decision on the continuation of the moratorium we must first consider all aspects for developing countries wit hout linking it with other issues. 6.94. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement: 6.95. I would like to thank India for its interest in the topic and join those Members that have already taken the floor in expressing our interest in ensuring a further extension of the moratorium WT/GC/M/19 2 - 48 - on e-commerce, as well as in reinvigorating the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, as agreed at MC11. We firmly believe in the positive effect that the moratorium has on enterprises' exports, especially for MSMEs, a s well as on the development of a globally competitive software industry. We hope that importance will continue to be given to ensuring the two moratoriums to be examined at the next Ministerial Conference , are treated consistently. 6.96. The representative of Fiji provided the following statement: 6.97. E-commerce plays an important role in facilitating access to goods and services in our economies . However , the level of trade and the financial gains resulted remains one - sided. Such gaps from trad e under the e -commerce platform remain wide in the case of small island developing countries such as Fiji. It is critical that meaningful approaches are developed to allow Members accessing the platform to also access a fair share of gains that are commens urate with its use of the platform , and this needs to be addressed. Fiji ha s noted the Chair 's report and we will continue to remain engaged under the Work Programme. The knowledge sharing opportunity on 5 July was important for Members. 6.98. The Chair announc ed that, as under the previous agenda item, he would consult broadly with Members after the summer break towards MC12 . He remained ready to facilitate further discussions on the basis of Members' submissions. 6.99. The General Council took note of the statements. 7 PREPARATIONS FOR THE TWELFTH SESSION OF THE MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE – STATEMENT BY THE CHAIR11 7.1. The Chair recalled that since the month of April he had been conducting broad consultations on the preparations for MC12, to hear Members' views on a range of issues including the substantive issues under the General Council, the format of the Conference and the outcome document. To ensure transparency and inc lusiveness, he had been reporting on these consultations regularly in a series of Informal General Council meetings. 7.2. In particular, a first round of consultations had taken place from 16 April to 12 May. At an Informal General Council meeting on 28 May, he had provided a comprehensive report, which had been circulated in JOB/GC/259, outlining the main take -aways from the consultations, namely, some overarching principles, priorities of Members in various areas, as well as their views on the format of the Conference and on the outcome document. 7.3. He had continued consulting with Members and group coordinators on the issues contained in his report, in a number of configurations. He had reported on th ose consultations at a further Informal General Council mee ting held on 22 June, and his statement had been circulated in JOB/GC/262. 7.4. At that meeting, he had noted that the main issues identified in his report in JOB/GC/259 could be useful pointers for Members to focus their work in preparing for MC12. He had also recalled that it remained entirely up to Members to determine which issues would be carried forward, as well as their actual content – and that , under each issue, possible results could take different forms. 7.5. At the 22 June meeting, and further to the call by many Members during his consultations, he had appointed Ambassador David Walker as the Facilitator for the multilateral process on the WTO response to the pandemic, which had been identified as a key priority for MC12. 7.6. The Chair's report in JOB/GC/259 identifie d a number of priority areas where work was already taking place in existing WTO bodies, on which he had provided a brief overview at the meeting on 22 June. The Chair had signal led that he would seek delegations' views and suggestions on how to 11 At the start of the meeting, the Chairman said that, r egarding Items 7 and 8 of the agenda, his intention was to provide a report on his consultations on MC12 preparations, the n ask Ambassador Walker, as Facilitator, to provide his initial report on the work he ha d carried out in the multilateral process on the WTO response to the pandemic (under sub -item 7(a)). He would then move to item 8 , and ask the delegations submitting t he communications under the three sub -items to introduce them in turns. He would then open the floor on both Items 7 and 8. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 49 - advance work in some specific areas mentioned in his report in more concrete terms – in particular the Appellate Body, WTO reform, and some iss ues in paragraph 3.17. 7.7. Consultations on th ose specific issues had taken place on 19 -20 July, and the Chair had reported at a further Informal General Council meeting the previous week, on 22 July. 7.8. A few points had emerged during th ose recent consultations . In particular, regarding the Appellate Body, he had recalled that the issue has been raised and discussed in the regular meetings of the Dispute Settlement Body, and with the "Walker Process" in 2019 there had been an intensive Facilitator -led process un der the auspices of the General Council. 7.9. The Chair had asked delegations how they saw work advancing in th at area for MC12, including in the context of the discussions for a Ministerial Declaration. 7.10. He had heard most delegations say that work should be don e together towards the shared objective of restoring a fully functioning Dispute Settlement system, a central pillar of the rules - based Multilateral Trading System. To that end, several suggestions had been put forward. It was also clear that fundamental differences in that area remain ed for substantive progress to be possible at MC12, and all delegations that had come to consult acknowledged th ose difficulties. Some delegations had suggested that Minis ters could give a political message and launch a future discussion on the restoration of a functioning dispute settlement system, either as part of a broader discussion on WTO reform or on a separate track. 7.11. On WTO reform, he had noted that this was an umb rella of issues of a horizontal and systemic nature, which ha d been raised in the General Council and in other WTO bodies. He had recalled that some delegations had also suggested the creation of a Working Group or a Committee on WTO reform to look at th at issue in a horizontal manner. Again, he had asked delegations how they saw the work advancing on this matter for MC12, including in the context of a Ministerial Declaration. 7.12. There seem ed to be broad agreement among delegations that had come to consult tha t work should be done towards a MC12 outcome about WTO reform. Some had suggested that th at outcome could be in the form of a political message, which acknowledge d the need for institutional reform and instruct ed the setting up of a multilateral exercise w ith broad participation, under the General Council. The nature and manner in which such an exercise would be organized would need to be further considered, and the Chair would look to Members for views and ideas. 7.13. What had seemed to emerge had been a willi ngness to have Ministers create a space at MC12 that would allow for discussions to take place going forward. The Chair had also taken note of a couple of preliminary suggestions – for instance, a number of delegations cautioned against being too prescript ive or over articulated, to ensure an enabling environment. On the other hand , there had also been the view that some specificity could be needed to enable focused discussions, given the broad spectrum of issues that could be considered under WTO reform. Another point had been made that th ose discussions should focus on the three core functions of the WTO, that is the monitoring and deliberative function; how to improve the negotiating function; and dispute settlement - and work on them in parallel . 7.14. And finally, other issues mentioned in paragraph 3.17 of his report, he recalled that some, but not all, of these issues had dedicated fora where they were or could be taken up and he had asked delegations how they saw work advancing on th ose for MC12. 7.15. In that regard, several delegations had referred to the importance of MC12 discussing and achieving results on issues related to trade and environment, sustainability and climate change and referred to the work taking place in th at respect. Others had also noted that issues related to trade and gender were of importance in the work going forward and that they had sought an outcome at MC12 in th at area. A number of Members had also stressed the importance of improving transparency and notifications, and had noted that they would like to see a MC12 outcome in that regard – while one Member had said that individual Committees were better placed to deal with th at matter. Some delegations had again cautioned against overloading the agenda, especially given the complex circumstances in which they are operating, and on bringing new issues to the WTO at th at time. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 50 - 7.16. Paragraph 3.17 was not an exhaustive list but reflect ed the issues that the Chair had heard during his first round of consultations, and, as he had said be fore, it would depend on Members which issues – contained but also aside of th at paragraph - they wish ed to ultimately carry forward. 7.17. The Chair also noted that he had heard the suggestion that a Ministerial outcome document could include a section with the results of previous Ministerial Conferences and how they ha d been implemented. 7.18. Finally, a number of delegations had raised once again the point of the format of MC1 2 and stressed the need for clarity about th at. Indeed, there should be a strive to arrive at an understanding about the format of the Conference as soon as feasible after the summer break. Knowing that th at largely depends on the sanitary situation overal l, they had to be mindful of the importance to ensure smooth preparations ahead of MC12, both from a substantive as well as logistical perspective. 7.19. Related to th at, and in particular if the Conference t ook place virtually, delegations had stressed again t he importance of concluding the work early on, so that Ministers were in a position to consider the results for endorsement when they gather ed virtually. 7.20. Therefore, as he had said at the Informal General Council meeting and as the Director -General had also reiterated, it was the Chair's intention to resume work in all areas immediately after the summer break, that was in early September, and to start a process of consultations on a possible Ministerial Declaration without delay. With that in mind, they should aim for texts in the various areas of work as soon as possible. 7.21. They were at the end of July, and many had seen that meeting as the natural marker in the lead up to MC12. As the Chair had said at the TNC meeting on Friday, and as had been noted by the Director -General, it was now time to focus their work on the key priority issues – and begin preparing possible outcomes. They were operating in very challenging times. For that Conference to be successful and to put the WTO on a positive trajectory, it would be essential that efforts were focused on a few key areas. Processes were underway for that to be possible, including the Facilitator -led multilateral process on the WTO response to the pandemic. Of course, work in all areas that Members wished to pursue remain ed equally important, but certain choices would have to be made in terms of what they could deliver by and at MC12, and what work could usefully continue post -MC12 in the way that Members deem ed appropriate, including through work programm es. 7.22. The Chair then proceeded to sub -item (a) of the agenda on the WTO response to the pandemic, and gave the floor to Ambassador Walker for his report. 7.1 WTO Response to the Pandemic – Report by the Facilitator 7.23. Ambassador David Walker (New Zealand), Facilitator for the WTO response to the pandemic , provided the following report: 7.24. Let me start by thanking the Chairman of the General Council and all of you for placing your trust in me as Facilitator. I am pleased to have this opportunity to report to you on the developments and consultations in the multilateral process on the WTO response to the pandemic. Since my appointment as Facilitator on 22 June at an Informal Meeting of the General Council, I undertook consultations and convened meetings in a range of formats. Specifically, I convened two sessions with group coordinators and delegations – on 6 July and 19 July – and I undertook a number of consultations with individual delegations and groups of delegations, at their request. To ensure transparency and i nclusiveness, the Chairman of the General Council also convened another Informal Meeting of the General Council on 22 July, at which I provided a brief update on the developments and ongoing discussion in this process. Let me now provide you with a recap o f where we stand. 7.25. The objective of the consultations and the two meetings (on 6 and 19 July) was to kick -off a discussion on the multilateral WTO response to the pandemic. We started out by looking at the elements that have been identified in the report by the Chairman of the General Council - in paragraph 3.3 of JOB/GC/259. Specifically, I suggested that we start our discussion by focusing on the trade policy related aspects (minus IP and IP -related aspects) and the "Third Way " - mindful that the elements contained in the report by the Chairman of the General Council serve as a starting WT/GC/M/19 2 - 51 - point and would be adjusted as Members deem necessary, going forward. I proposed leaving IP and IP related aspects aside from this process for n ow, as the Chairman of the TRIPS Council will be reporting on these aspects to the General Council. 7.26. To kick -off a discussion, I asked three specific questions, namely: (i) do we have all the necessary elements in paragraph 3.3 of JOB/GC/259; (ii) is there anything that needs to be added or removed; (iii) do delegations have any views on how these elements should be taken forward in more concrete terms. In the follow -up meeting, which was held in the same format on 19 July - and as part of my preparations fo r my initial report to the General Council - I suggested that we consider three specific elements, namely: Firstly, to see if any delegation or group of delegations wished to put forward or signal further ideas and thoughts on the substance or the process, including planned proposals. Secondly, to take stock of what we have on the table in terms of proposals and ideas, and in so doing, look at how we wish to structure our work and discussion as we move this process forward in September. Thirdly, to consider , tentatively, if there are any issues that might be up for harvest, ahead of MC12. 7.27. Given the urgency of the matter, and the little time left before MC12, I emphasised that the sooner any further planned proposals or suggestions are fed into the process, t he better. I also noted in my consultations that I was aware there were ongoing discussions among some Members – with the intention to feed the results of these discussions into this multilateral process. In this regard, Ambassador Spencer (Jamaica) and Am bassador Tan (Singapore) made a room document available to delegations at the meeting I convened on 19 July, which is available to delegations as RD/GC/14. This document contains the result of Ambassador Tan's and Ambassador Spencer's joint effort working with a group of Members and reflects conversations they jointly held with a range of Members. I would like to take this opportunity to, once again, thank them for the tremendous work that has gone into this effort. It is a valuable piece of work and I hope we may look to build on some of the points contained in this document as we advance our work in this multilateral process. 7.28. I should also note that, as part of the discussion in this multilateral process, Brazil signalled that its recent submission contai ned in JOB/GC/263 covers, amongst others, trade and health issues and is thus of relevance to this discussion. In the same vein, Canada signalled that there is a revised submission by the Trade and Health Initiative, contained in WT/GC/W/823, which will be introduced under the next agenda item i.e., item 8.a. A couple of other delegations and other groups of Members signalled that they were looking to possibly submit further proposals. 7.29. I would encourage you all, once again, to submit any further proposals on issues related to the WTO response to the pandemic as soon as possible, so that they can be fed into this process and inform our work. 7.30. In the discussions so far, we also touched upon how we might, potentially, structure our work and discussion going fo rward - taking into account pandemic -related communications, including proposals that have already been put forward under the General Council and WTO bodies. As the Director -General recently mentioned, there is already a plethora of material out there. Not ably, under the General Council alone, there are more than 25 documents that relate – in full or in part – to the subject of WTO response to the pandemic. Beyond that, there are various other communications to WTO bodies which are linked to this subject ma tter. These communications come in a variety of forms: including, for example, in the form of declarations, joint statements, narratives and proposals; and, as contained in room document (RD/GC/14), the useful compilation shared by Ambassador Spencer and A mbassador Tan. 7.31. These documents and communications are filled with a wealth of views and suggestions on the various topics that relate to the pandemic and can guide us in formulating a multilateral WTO response. I will be using the coming days and weeks to carefully review and reflect on these various communications to understand fully what we have on the table, and I would encourage you to do the same. 7.32. As a way forward, I would propose that we structure our discussions around the issues that have already been addressed in proposals and raised in consultations, and that we proceed on a thematic basis. I would look to start those thematic sessions as early as possible in September. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 52 - 7.33. Based on what I have seen in the documents so far, including in RD/GC/14, an d what I have heard in my consultations and the meetings on 6 and 19 July, I think we could meaningfully and usefully kick -off the thematic series with the following focus areas, namely: (i) export restrictions; (ii) trade facilitation, regulatory coherenc e, cooperation and tariffs; (iii) the role of services; (iv) transparency and monitoring; (v) collaboration with other organizations and engagement with key stakeholders; and (vi) the idea of a framework to respond more effectively to future pandemics and crises. This is not necessarily an exhaustive list of themes, but I think it would usefully kick -off the thematic discussion. 7.34. In the consultations and discussion so far, I also suggested that we could tentatively consider issues that may be up for harvest , ahead of MC12. Based on what I have heard, I understand that, for instance, putting in place and operationalizing collaborative and cooperative arrangements between international organizations and strengthening the relationship with key stakeholders is something that we all seem to be wanting to do. To be able to do this, it would be necessary to understand a bit better what this might entail. In this regard, it seems to me that it may be useful if the Secretariat could scope out some more details on this . For example, (i) which organizations and stakeholders would need to be involved; (ii) what contribution and value added could each organization/stakeholder bring to the table; and (iii) how would such a collaboration/cooperation be organized. 7.35. In this co ntext, I would also like to recall that the Director General recently referred to various collaboration efforts that are already under way with several international institutions, including WHO, WIPO, IMF, and the World Bank. A more detailed exploration of these existing collaborations could meaningfully contribute to the scoping exercise, including in terms of best practices and lessons learned. 7.36. One particular aspect that is frequently referenced in the discussions, is the "relationship with, and the role of, the private sector ". In this context, I would like to mention the High -Level Dialogue on "Expanding Covid -19 vaccine manufacture to promote equitable access", which was jointly organized by the WHO and the WTO on 21 July under the umbrella of the Dire ctor General's "Third Way". This event, as I am sure those who attended would agree, helped shed more light on this subject, which I hope will be useful as we continue thinking about what the WTO should be doing in this regard. This concludes my report to you today, which will be issued after the meeting in the JOB/GC -series12. 7.37. Again, I would like to thank all delegations for the constructive ideas that I have received so far as part of the consultations and discussion. I think we are all of the view that i t is our shared responsibility to formulate an effective and credible multilateral WTO response to the pandemic. I will therefore continue to count on your active participation and guidance, as we move this process forward and, to quote the Director Genera l, "work to tie the different elements together into a framework ahead of MC12". 7.38. I would welcome any views and any comments that you may have on what I have outlined in my report, including on having the Secretariat scope out in more concrete terms what so me of this collaborative activity might entail. In this regard, if any delegation wishes to discuss any of these specific issues or any other matter related to this process further, please know that you can come to see me anytime. 7.39. On the way forward, it is my intention to continue the multilateral process – as I mentioned earlier – in September, in a series of thematic sessions and in a range of different formats, and I will continue to report on this multilateral process at open -ended Informal Meetings and formally to the General Council, at the invitation of the Chairman of the General Council. I very much hope that I can continue to count on your guidance and support. 7.40. I am ready to respond to any questions that Members may have. Thank you, Chair. 7.41. The Chair thanked Ambassador Walker for his report and, as announced at the start of the meeting , moved to agenda item 8, to then open the floor for both items. 12 The Facilitator's report was subsequently circulated as JOB/GC/269. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 53 - 7.42. The General Council took note of the report . 8 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MULTILATERAL PROCESS ON THE WTO RESPONSE TO THE PANDEMIC13 8.1 Draft General Council Declaration – COVID -19 and Beyond: Trade and Health – Communication from Australia; Brazil; Brunei Darussalam; Canada; Chile; China; the European Union; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Japan; Kazakhstan ; Kenya; R epublic of Korea; Mexico; Republic of Moldova; Montenegro; New Zealand; North Macedonia; Norway; Singapore; Switzerland; the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; the United Kingdom; Uruguay and Vanuatu (WT/GC/W/823) 8.1. The Chair recalled that the first sub -item under agenda item 8 had been included in the agenda by the co -sponsors of the "Draft General Council Declaration – COVID -19 and Beyond: Trade and Health" , which had been circulated in document WT/GC/W/823. He invite d Canada to take the floor. 8.2. The representative of Canada provided the following statement: 8.3. Thank you Chair for the opportunity to update the General Council on the draft declaration titled COVID -19 and Beyond: Trade and Health and its contribution to the m ultilateral process on the WTO response to the pandemic. Since the last General Council meeting, the initiative has added five more WTO Members as co -sponsors - Brunei Darussalam, Chinese Taipei, Uruguay, Vanuatu and Kazakhstan - bringing the total number to 52 WTO Members. More importantly, we have recently circulated a revised and updated version of the initiative in document WT/GC/W/823 which contains a number of improvements and additions to the proposal. To begin, in our discussions in past meetings, w e have always been clear; the trade policy actions set out in this proposed declaration are not an exclusive list. That said, we identified them as critical to help keep trade in essential medical goods, including vaccines, open and to support the ramping up of production of these goods. We recognize that there may be complementary aspects of trade policy that can also help Members respond to global crises such as the one we continue to face. The actions we decided to focus on in the Declaration are designe d to make a positive, trade facilitating contribution to the WTO response to the current pandemic and to enhance Members' resilience against future pandemics. I'd like to now highlight the new elements in the text. 8.4. First, we believe it is imperative for go vernments to respond to the widespread call for restraint and transparency when it comes to export restrictions. We therefore suggest strengthened action in relation to: (i) using such measures only when necessary and as a last resort after considering oth er less trade -restrictive measures; (ii) regularly reviewing if they remain necessary and to limit market disruptions to the greatest extent; and (iii) recognizing that substantial producers have a particular responsibility towards achieving equitable acce ss to essential medical goods, especially for Members which are highly dependent on imports. We have also added calls for increased transparency from Members around imposed export restrictions, including calls for positive responses from those Members to a ny requests for urgent consultations from Members affected by those measures. Lastly, we believe it helpful that the WTO proactively share any information provided by Members with the organizations responsible for the operational response to the crisis. We see the sharing of trade policy information by the WTO as helping to create a collaborative approach to informing on the current conditions for trade, and for receiving feedback regarding the real -time trade barriers that may restrain that operational res ponse by other international organizations. 8.5. Second, we have added a commitment to intensifying efforts to accelerate the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement provisions that support the timely and efficient release of goods. There is also a p roposal to that effect currently being discussed in the Trade Facilitation Committee and it deserves further advancement by Members. 8.6. Third, and in support of ongoing efforts, we are calling for further cooperation among all WTO Members, and between the WTO and other international organi zations and the private sector, to support the production and distribution of essential medical goods, including vaccines. This also includes further work by the WTO to report on COVID -19 measures taken by Members and to repo rt on the trade in essential medical goods. Members are also called upon to examine how to improve 13 See footnote 11. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 54 - data gaps in our understanding on the production, demand and supply of such goods, including through a review of statistical collection and classification of goods. 8.7. Fourth, the co -sponsors believe Members need to consider the establishment at MC12 of a work programme on pandemic preparedness which could lead to additional steps or commitments that could help Members to enhance their preparedness and crisis resilience. Chair, these updates to the proposed Declaration are designed to respond to the changed circumstances faced today as compared to the end of 2020 when the ideas were first discussed in the General Council, as well as lessons learnt since then. This Declaration also can be seen as a concrete contribution to the multilateral process on the WTO response to the pandemic. 8.2 Urgent Trade Policy Responses to the COVID -19 Crisis – Communication from the European Union to the WTO General Council (WT/ GC/231) 8.8. The Chair recalled that the agenda item made reference to a communication from the European Union on "Urgent Trade Policy Responses to the COVID -19 Crisis" circulated in document WT/GC/231 , and invite d the European Union to present th e communicatio n. 8.9. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 8.10. Beyond individual actions by Members, the agenda of this meeting suggests that expectations are high that the WTO membership would provide a collective and solid contribution as part of the international efforts to respond to the COVID -19 pandemic. As the membership is endeavouring to shape the "how?" the European Union has sketched out its views in this respect in the Communication on urgent trade policy responses. We should build on the lessons learnt and, in a solution -oriented mode, take a holistic appr oach to the issue. 8.11. As WTO Members, our prime responsibility is to enable a trade -conducive environment. We have suggested enhanced emphasis on a restraint from unnecessary export restrictions in particular where the exporting Member is a substantial produc er of vaccines and other essential goods. We also underscore the need to respect the highest degree of transparency, when it comes to notification of or information about all measures that have a trade restricting effect. In that sense, the European Union firmly believes that the proposed Council Declaration on Trade and Health just presented under the preceding point provides an effective and robust way forward. 8.12. Needless to say, trade policy cannot be conducted in isolation. There is room and need for strengthened collaboration both with relevant international organi zations and private stakeholders, including the industry. 8.13. In this regard, we welcome the High-Level Dialogue that took place on 21 July at the initiative of the WTO Director General and the WHO Director General. 8.14. We should support the private sector in its unprecedented efforts to increase vaccine production by maintaining open supply chains and improve the way we monitor trade flows and market developments. 8.15. Equitable vaccine distribution requi res acknowledgement of the different level of development of recipient countries and exploiting any available manufacturing potential. Therefore, the European Union strongly encourages the industry to engage in voluntary licensing agreements for vaccine production and distribute vaccines at affordable prices, involving no profit, to low and middle -income countries. As indicated in a previous point of the agenda, we are also ready to discuss how to facilitate the issue of compulsory licences. 8.16. This crisis has brought to our attention the striking reality that building crisis resilience requires investment in domestic manufacturing facilities. It is of particular relevance in those regions, which have a limited industrial base and heavily rely on imports. Howev er, the much -sought investment will only happen in a business -friendly environment, which means the right regulatory framework that also includes protection of intellectual property. 8.17. The views set out in this Communication are a genuine contribution and a support to the multilateral process aimed at shaping a WTO response to the pandemic at the latest by MC12. We WT/GC/M/19 2 - 55 - are ready to further engage with the understanding that such response should be meaningful and equip us to address the global challenges of today and of tomorrow. 8.3 Ministerial Declaration on Combating, Mitigating and Recovering from the Impacts of COVID -19 and Beyond – Communication from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (WT/GC/W/822) 8.18. The Chair recalled that the item involve d a communication from the delegation of Chinese Taipei entitled "Ministerial Declaration on Combating, Mitigating and Recovering from the Impacts of COVID -19 and Beyond" circulated in document WT/GC/W/822. He invite d Chinese Taipei to take the floor. 8.19. The representative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 8.20. We are pleased that we are also a co -sponsor to the Trade and Health proposal led by Canada. Thank you also for the opportunity to briefly introduce document WT/GC/W/822 entitled "Ministerial Declaration on Combating, Mitigating and Recovering from the Impact of COVID -19 and Beyond", which includes some points additional to the elements included in the Trade and Health proposal. We hope that some ideas in our proposal will contribute to the WTO's collective effort to address the pandemic. 8.21. As Members can see, this document tries to integrate with other proposals as much as possible. Here, my delegation would like to highlight some ideas and key elements which a re additional to or different from the elements in other proposals. We all agree that saving lives is of highest importance and utmost urgency. But rescuing the livelihood of vulnerable people is also of extremely high importance and high urgency. When we were drafting our proposal, many reports and studies relate d to the pandemic caught our attention about how disadvantaged Members and vulnerable people are suffering most seriously. Our proposal distinguishes from other proposals in that we suggest to miti gate the impact of the extreme situations and to use trade tools to help less developed country Members to recover from the impact, especially to identify trade and economic tools to assist vulnerable Members and vulnerable people. Actually, we are not the only one which considered that economic recovery from the pandemic is of highest importance. At the APEC Trade Ministerial Meeting earlier this year, APEC Trade Ministers already emphasized the essential role of trade in tackling the impacts of the COVID -19 pandemic and "in enabling a strong economic recovery for all our people". 8.22. I would like to briefly mention some points to bring them to your attention. On paragraph 6 of our proposal , although many Members have separately mentioned in various occasions that they support the Director General 's Third Way and her role in pursuing the expansion of vaccine production, Members have not made a collective support through a formal decision to endorse the Director General 's role. Introducing this paragraph into a Ministerial Declaration would show that the whole WTO membership is in full and firm support of the Director General 's "Third Way". This might further enhance the Director General 's role and position to discuss with the private sector and to help Members and the WTO on the related matters. This also has to do with the WTO's cooperation and collaboration with other international organizations. 8.23. On paragraphs 9 and 10 , we suggest Members to consider the role of government support and technical regulation in support of making vaccines more available from the WTO perspective. From paragraphs 24 to 37, we tried to identify what could be the trade and economic tools to sav e and restore livelihood of the most vulnerable countries, people and sectors. Since the WTO is one of international organizations most relevant to addressing COVID -19 and since the WTO 's whole membership is severely affected by the pandemic, it should be an important task at MC12 for Members to comprehensively address the trade and economic aspects arising from COVID -19 so as to show to the world that the WTO is relevant to the life and livelihood of the people. 8.24. Last, but not least, there is a suggestion on the institutional arrangement in paragraph 38 of our proposal. Unlike the trade and environment issues being handled by the Committee on Trade and Environment, currently we do not have an existing WTO body resp onsible for addressing public health crises from the trade perspective and for reviewing the related trade measures in a holistic manner. Considering that public health related issues involve many WTO bodies, and considering that it is important to timely and comprehensively respond to COVID -19 and other public health WT/GC/M/19 2 - 56 - crises of similar nature by the WTO, we suggest Members to reflect whether the current WTO's institutional framework is sufficient to address these issues or whether Members should consider creating a new Committee on Trade and Public Health so as to tackle the related issues in a horizontal and holistic manner. Again, we look forward to Ambassador Walker's thematic discussions in September and will follow the majority view on what should be tackled in the initial process. 8.25. The Chair proceeded to open the floor to delegations on items 7 and 8. 8.26. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 8.27. Brazil thanks Canada for placing this item on the agenda and for presenting the revised document. Brazil also commends the co -sponsors of the Trade and Health Initiative in updating the text and integrate vaccines into the discussion. We are fully committed to vaccine access within the "Diplomacia da Saúde", which can be translated as "Health Diplomacy", a top priority of our current foreign policy. In this sense, we also believe that a ministerial decision on trade and health should be the top priority for MC 12. This is the key deliverable for the Ministerial C onference and will consti tute an important signal that the WTO can provide adequate responses to the pandemic and other crises. 8.28. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement: 8.29. Uruguay is one of the co-sponsors of document WT/GC/W/823 COVID 19 and beyond: Trade and Health. We firmly believe that the WTO cannot afford not to have a concrete outcome on the role of the organization in this pandemic, which has already lasted a year and a half. The least we can do as Members is to arrive at a policy declaration, in which we agree to implement trade measures that favour and facilitate trade in essential medical products, including vaccines. Other Members certainly have excellent ideas on how to achieve this goal, and this is an opportunity to come up with ideas and be inno vative. 8.30. In our role as co -sponsors, we have agreed to make our best efforts not to modify the applied tariffs on lines of interest , and to exercise self -restraint when applying restrictive measures to exports – including customs measures, services and tec hnical regulations – and implementing a monitoring system together with the Secretariat. With regard to the Secretariat 's role, it will produce a trade monitoring report every two years , publish a summary report every three months on measures taken by Members , work with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Customs Organization (WCO) to develop a database on supply chains of essential medical products , and draw up a report on compliance six months after the adoption of this Declaration. Basically, this text is intended to send a clear signal to public opinion that WTO Members are capable of reaching a series of basic commitments and creating a statistical monitoring and develop ment structure, enabling us to have greater transparency and shed light on the trade in products regarding which we are all in the dark. 8.31. Lastly, it is important to mention that discussions on this text in the General Council are being conducted in paralle l with those on intellectual property rights in the TRIPS Council, and Uruguay hopes that after the summer break we will be able to consolidate the progress in both bodies in order to have a single final document that reflects the greatest number of issues and the interests of all Members. The world is watching us. Our people are going through dramatic moments and trade is suffering every day, with MSMEs, the basis of our economies, affected above all. It is vitally important to make a declaration on trade and health at the Ministerial Conference and this text is an excellent means of launching an extensive dialogue among the entire Membership. Comments, suggestions for changes and support for the initiative are all welcome. 8.32. The representative of Viet Nam provided the following statement: 8.33. As I am delivering this statement for item 7 as well as items 4 and 8 under the G eneral Council's agenda all together because my delegation believes these items are related. First, we would like to underline that the pandem ic is far from over while the COVID -19 new variants are complicating and threatening the socioeconomic situation in many parts of the world, especially Southeast Asia n countries including Viet Nam. We are taking various measures in solidarity with the international community to fight the pandemic and save lives, overcoming disruption and ensure inclusive recovery. We support international efforts and coordinated measures in scaling up vaccine WT/GC/M/19 2 - 57 - production and equitable access to vaccines and other tools for an effective response to COVID -19, and promoting an inclusive recovery from the pandemic. On this occasion we also wish to express our deep appreciation to our friends who have come to help espec ially for vaccine donations at this critical juncture. 8.34. Second, as part of a global solution, the WTO's response to the pandemic needs to deliver a meaningful package and outcome or MC12. Vietnam thanks Ambassador David Walker for his concrete report as fa cilitator of the multilateral process under the G eneral Council purview. We appreciate many Members who have provided valuable inputs to this process through different submissions as well as their active engagement. We support Ambassador Walker's outline o f a final package and his plan for continued and intensified consultations to reach consensus on the WTO response to the pandemic. We will actively cooperate and participate in this multilateral process towards consensus within this organization for the de liverable s at MC12. 8.35. Third, concerning the substance of the WTO response to the pandemic, we are of the view that it is important to be comprehensive and concrete, not only to deal with this pandemic but also to enable responses for future health crisis pa ndemics. Hence our considerations are all substantive and on the trade and health initiative, we urge for trade policy responses to the COVID -19 crisis . The TRIPS waiver would be reflected in the WTO response package. 8.36. The representative of Norway provided the following statement: 8.37. Norway notes with satisfaction the broad support in the membership for making the WTO response to the pandemic a main theme for MC12. We appreciate the engagement of Members in this regard, and we are happy to be among t he cosponsors of the Trade and Health Initiative listed under agenda item 8 (a). Norway also welcomes the contribution of the E uropean Union listed under agenda item 8 (b). Furthermore, Norway welcomes the appointment of Ambassador David Walker as Facilitato r for our collective work on the WTO response to the pandemic and would like to thank him for his report. Norway is looking forward to engaging in the thematic process outlined by the Facilitator with the aim to have a robust outcome on trade and health at MC12. 8.38. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP Group , provided the following statement: 8.39. My intervention covers both agenda items 7 and 8. We thank the Facilitator for his report and acknowledge the contributions of Members in WT/GC/W/823, WT/GC/231 and WT/GC/W/822 , which is critical in light of the global circumstances posed by the C OVID -19 pandemic. The WTO has been fairly responsive to the impact of the pandemic. Initiatives taken to date include monitoring of trade measures, publication of reports on trends in trade, collaboration with other international organi zations, facilitating discussions in committees and negotiation groups, initiation of processes with a view to map out the WTO 's response to the effects of the pandemi c with a dedicated Facilitator and very recently the Director General 's convening of events that bring vaccines stakeholders together. We are seeing progress with the reduction of restrictive measures implemented in light of the pandemic with continued rep orts on specific trade concerns faced by Members. These initiatives should continue and be bolstered, as trade restrictive measures negatively affect the trade and economies of ACP Group Members. A uniform approach is critical that considers both health an d trade that aims to eliminate unilateral measures that could further exacerbate the situation of our vulnerable Members. 8.40. The ACP Group believes that the WTO should further enhance the pace at which it collaborates with key international organi zations , such as the IMF, World Bank and regional organi zations or country groupings , to complement initiatives underway in these frameworks. It is advisable that the WTO's response to the pandemic be guided by core principles. These principles could include equitabl e and efficient access to C OVID -19 vaccines therapeutics and related products, preservation of trade flows, international coherence, inclusivity, transparency, respect for WTO rules and adaptation to a post COVID -19 global economy that embraces the positiv e changes occasioned by the pandemic, while enabling Members to manage issues that have emerged. Our focus should be on building back better. There are at least three approaches that the WTO should pursue in its response to the pandemic: 8.41. One, trade and hea lth – there should be a coordinated and timely response to the health dimension of the crisis, similar to what is now in progress in the TRIPS Council. We welcome text -WT/GC/M/19 2 - 58 - based negotiations on the waiver, and it is critical to have a text adopted prior to MC1 2. We urge Members to prioritise discussions on the waiver with a view to arriving at an amicable conclusion that improves access to medical supplies to respond to the pandemic. In parallel, the TRIPS Council initiative could be complemented by improving t he pace at which COVID -19 related medical and health products are processed at the border, removing unnecessary trade -related bottlenecks, export restrictions including tariffs and raw materials, in order to better facilitate transactions involving these p roducts along the supply chain. Additional measures to monitor, safeguard and expedite procedures for vaccine inputs to be more predictable for manufactures is critical to sustain production and needs . Further , the WTO needs to continue to collaborate clos ely with the World Health Organi zation and private sector stakeholders involved in the production and trade of these items. 8.42. Two, it is important to streamline the recovery and rebuilding initiatives in the work programmes of WTO committees and negotiating groups, bearing in mind that the impact of the pandemic is likely to be prolonged, and the lag effect as well as the severity of the impact, will vary from country to country, most likely depending on their trade capacity. Developing countries such as thos e in the ACP Group will be disproportionately affected. The rebuilding work in the WTO should involve both a focus on the impact of the present crisis, facilitating development -oriented and capacity -building work to address these crises to mitigate the cur rent circumstance s, and establishing a blueprint for future similar events. 8.43. Three, monitoring and reporting – the WTO should continuously monitor and evaluate the impact of the crisis on trade and report findings so that the relevant committees can take them into account in their work. The objective is to ensure that the pandemic does not interrupt world trade nor impede the integration of developing countries and LDCs into the global economy and global value chains, safeguard measures to sustain the vulnerable and worst affected must be instituted to expedite recovery for such economies. 8.44. Four, collaboration with global economic governance organi zations – the WTO Secretariat should continue and enhance its collaboration with other international organi zations, such as the United Nations, IMF, World Bank and Regional Development Banks, to ensure that global economic recovery is coherent, timely, inclusive and incorporates trade as an important element of global recovery. The objective should be to ensure that issues such as reduced access to trade finance, trade restrictive measures and possible trade distorting subsi dies emanating from stimulus programmes, all of which we have seen throughout the crisis, have a lasting negative impact on trade flows. This is critical to the survival of MSMEs, as they are disproportionately affected by the fall-out from the pandemic. 8.45. We are already witnessing a third wave of infection of COVID -19 and new variants which will continue to stall our economic recovery and rebuilding. We need to work urgently to prioritise these elements of the negotiations with available WTO tools, that can ensure equitable access to affordable vaccines and medical supplies, required to help us all to combat COVID -19. We look forward to working closely with you Chair and Ambassador David Walker in this regard. In closing, we will continue to approach discussi ons on the WTO 's response in a solution -seeking mode. We believe that outcomes from these discussions should contribute to the successful adaptation of developing countries and LDCs to a post -pandemic trading environment , and provide a blueprint on how the WTO should respond to similar future occurrences. 8.46. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 8.47. In the current global response to this unprecedented pandemic, the bottom -line for the WTO as an organization governing international trade is that we should first and foremost focus our efforts on facilitating trade in essential medical goods and preventing disruption of the supply chain. In the WTO, we have been discussing for a w hile how to enhance the WTO's response to multiple aspects of COVID -19, with a view to presenting a broad set of trade -related policies in preparation for MC12. In this regard, Ambassador Walker 's role as a facilitator is crucial and my delegation is ready to work with him. As a co -sponsor of the proposal on Trade and Health, Korea believes that this initiative will contribute to the WTO 's enhanced response to the pandemic. The initiative notably presents comprehensive trade -related actions that will certai nly serve the WTO's objective. My delegation calls on Members to support the Trade and Health Initiative and work together to elaborate the WTO's response to the pandemic when we come back in September. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 59 - 8.48. The representative of the United Kingdom provided th e following statement: 8.49. This is an area where Ministers will want a substantive outcome, as we will still be in the midst of the pandemic when they meet at MC12. Let me pay tribute to Ambassador Walker for the consultations and hard work. Let me also pay tribute to the D irector General for the collaboration with other international organi zations and business. We need more of this collaboration in the months ahead. We are a cosponsor of TAHI and therefore encourage others to join up to it. We also welco me the E uropean Union and Chinese Taipei 's proposals. As others have said, we need a holistic approach that focuses on practical solutions. That is what is so strong about the Trade and Health Declaration Proposal that delivers concrete actions to facilitate trade during the pandemic and beyond, allowing Members to react with flexibility and agility to pressures. It is important that as we move forward, we reach an outcome for this Ministerial Conference, but also a programme of work that allows us to develop these proposals in the years ahead to ensure this organi zation is prepared for future pandemics. 8.50. The representative of China provided the following statement: 8.51. Under item 7, o n process, we are now at the end of July, and it is high time that we need to pragmatically focus on a few key areas, ar eas that have the possibility to achieve something at MC12. As the D irector General said during the 15 July TNC Meeting, striving for perfection prevents us from achieving something good. We can put it like this : striving for all prevents us from achieving something adequate. Time is not on our side. It is not appropriate to add elements or topics that are highly controversial or without mature discussions, or even never discussed in the WTO. On substance, I just want to highlight two aspects : first, in our view, focused discussions on the Appellate Body impasse should be organized as soon as possible, ideally immediately after the summer break. We are open to the platform or format of such consultation, be it in the framework of the DSB, or under the auspic e of General Council. In any event, Members should have a frank exchange of views and brainstorm on what type of outcomes is desirable and feasible at MC12. Second , China supports hav ing some sentences and paragraphs that demonstrate Ministers ' political guidance on how to advance the reform of the WTO, perhaps including some timeframes towards MC13. We also note that some Members suggest that it would not necessarily be helpful to have too many overlapping configurations. With this observation, we would ask whether establishing a Working Group on WTO Reform would add value to the current discussion. The package of reform would be a result from all relevant bodies and other mechanisms in t he WTO. Lastly Chair, let me thank Ambassador Walker for his efforts on consultations on the multilateral process of the WTO's response to the pandemic. China will continue to engage in the following thematic discussions under the leadership of Ambassador Walker, and make needed contributions. 8.52. Under item 8 , China thanks Canada for the update on this important initiative on behalf of co - sponsors. The WTO could and should play an active role in response to the C OVID -19 pandemic. The WTO should achieve concret e results as soon as possible in this field. We hope that the initiative will provide input s to MC12 outcomes on the WTO's response to the pandemic. China looks forward to a multilateral declaration at MC12, not only on our current work but also on the way forward. We also stand ready to work with Members to strive for Ministerial Decisions on specific issues. 8.53. The representative of Turkey provided the following statement: 8.54. Our intervention will pertain to sub -items (a) and (b) of agenda item 8. We will refer to certain parts of these documents. Given the urgency of the situation, ramping up production of vaccines is a priority for all. Dialogue with vaccine developers and manufacturers as well as those of other necessary medical products is an effective way to detect problems and bottlenecks. In addition to efforts to increase production, trade facilitation is a priority area for Turkey. We can focus on what can be done to accelerate a simplified and timely release of goods critical to fight the pandemic. Turkey co -sponsors a proposal to that effect , which suggests accelerating implementation of the TFA and enhancing communication, cooperation and automation in border operations. We believe another significant contribution of the WTO during this process ca n be to ensure transparency of the restrictive and facilitative measures and to provide foresight. For enhanced transparency, we would like to note the WTO Market Access Committee 's recent report of April 2021 as a good example of stock -taking exercise. Th is practice could continue in future. Facing critical shortages of certain supplies, many countries from all levels of development have naturally resorted to export -restrictive measures during the pandemic. This is an area where can see again how delicate the nexus between trade and health is. Any rule -making on this should be a careful exercise because it may affect WT/GC/M/19 2 - 60 - States' decision -making on human health and safety. Finally, as a member of the G -20, we are fully committed to "limit trade measures taken to promote public health to those that are targeted, proportionate, transparent, temporary and consistent with WTO obligations. " 8.55. The representative of Malaysia provided the following statement: 8.56. Under a genda items 7 and 8 , on the WTO's response to the COVID -19 pandemic, we acknowledge that the WTO needs a holistic approach in addressing this global public health crisis. It is our hope that the various efforts i n response to the COVID -19 pandemic will be more structured as we are approaching MC12 in Dece mber. With regards to addressing the COVID -19 pandemic, we wish to stress the importance of undertaking all measures necessary to expand, diversify, and facilitate the supply of essential medicines urgently , through a close collaboration with the private sector. 8.57. The representative of Chad provided the following statement: 8.58. The LDC Group would like to recall our statement last year on this issue. Our aim is to save lives and bolster economic resilience. In May 2020 , the LDC Group suggested the adoption of provisions to avoid export restrictions on goods , including basic food supplies and essential medical supplies when these products are purchased by LDCs for national use or when exported for humanitarian purposes. We therefore wish to underscor e the importance of adopting a holistic coordinated approach which addresses all relevant WTO pillars to ensure access to medication, vaccines and other necessary equipment. We welcome the thematic spheres proposed by Ambassador Walker and believe they wil l help us to guide our discussions. They are indeed very relevant and we encourage Members to bear in mind the impact that the pandemic has on LDCs concretely , and the necessary political responses to mitigate their effects. The WTO's work must also includ e types of cooperation which pave the way to addressing manufacturing capacity limitations in LDCs. We also wish to see this opportunity to thank the Director -General for her dialogues with the WHO and WIPO in order to ensure a collaboration which aims to boost access to vaccines and therapeutics to combat COVID -19. We also welcome the efforts made by Ambassador Spencer and Tan and we hope that their work will also be recognized here alongst with the work of Ambassador Walker as part of the General Council' s work. We also wish to express our appreciation to the WTO for following up on trade related restrictions and COVID -19-related easing of measures as well as the online reports. Finally, we would like to note that we made various statements during the informal TNC meeting and the Heads of Delegation s meeting , and we request that these be incorporated into our statement here.14 8.59. Turning now to item 8, the LDC Group would like to thank the E uropean Union and other co-authors for their various proposals on tra de and health , especially for their contributions to the multilateral procedure tied to the WTO's pandemic response. It is quite clear that the COVID -19 pandemic has stepped up challenges and added additional pressures for vulnerable countries , especially LDCs. The LDC Group would like to note the aim of securing equitable access to vaccines worldwide. It is of utmost importance that we act on a global stage to address this pressing urgent need, and we therefore call on all WTO Members to agree on the need to take steps to address this current public health emergency created by the pandemic. The LDC Group had a very fruitful exchange with the E uropean Union yesterday and we would like to thank Ambassador Machado for his personal commitment and for hearing our views. We welcome efforts made by the EU delegation and their notifications provided to the WTO , which help to bolster transparency within our organiza tion. Our representatives are ready to continue an exchange of views with the EU delegation , including on the proposed waiver under item 4 of today's agenda. We hope that this can help us to move in the direction of forging a consensus -based outcome amongs t all WTO Members. 8.60. The representative of Côte d'Ivoire provided the following statement: 8.61. Under agenda item 7, t here is no doubt whatsoever that COVID -19 has had a major impact on our population. In light of this, the agenda item on trade and health is of paramount importance. It's worth noting, however, that COVID -19 doesn't only impact people 's health , it also impacts access to finance. COVID -19 exacerbated the challenges that developing countries and LDCs face in terms of finding access to funding for tr ade. The WTO must adopt a holistic approach to finding solutions , 14 The statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group at the at the 23 July Informal TNC and Informal HODs meeting is annexed to the Minutes of this meeting . WT/GC/M/19 2 - 61 - this must be global and inclusive ensuring that our work can move forward. We welcome your report in JOB/GC/259 which includes all the concerns reported by Members in your consultations. We also welcome other documents which respond to concerns about debt and finance. We invite you and Ambassador Walker to bear this in mind in your consultations. 8.62. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement : 8.63. Under item 7, s ince the global outbreak of the coronavirus, our economies have been struggling to stay afloat. There is a clear disproportionality in both the health and economic effects of the pandemic, as developing co untries, LDCs and small island developing economies were the most affected. To make things worse, the capacity to respond to the situation is even more disproportionate. For instance, only 4% of the African population is vaccinated. The African economy incurred a 2.1% contraction in 2020 and it is estimated that 39 million Africans could slip into extreme poverty this year. As we have repeatedly said, no one is safe until everyone is. And no economic recovery will happen unless the health crisis is brought under control. Bearing this in mind, we call on Members to take exceptional decisions in these exceptional circumstances. It is clear that the TRIPS provisions on patent protection and the related licensing solutions have failed to meet our needs. In this regard, we are glad that textual discussions have begun for a TRIPS waiver , but we must accelerate discussions and ensure that we are able to reach an outcome at the earliest. In parallel, we need to facilitate (i) the movement of inputs for the production of vaccines, (ii) the transfer of technology, (iii) an equitable distribution of vaccines, and (iv) access to essential goods for the foreseeable future. To achieve this, we need to eliminate IP barriers, export restrictions on certain goods and ultimatel y develop an appropriate response programme for future crisis situations. Furthermore, the WTO has to play a proactive and leading role to ensure collaboration between international organi zations and relevant stakeholders with the aim of achieving a common response to the pandemic. 8.64. With respect to the concerning drop in government revenues and the increase in debts, we call on Members to consider the discussions conducted with respect to debt restructuring and debt relief in other international fora , while the WTO could examine the balance of payment needs of Members , in view of providing meaningful support to the most affected sectors. Africa is highly reliant on its agricultural sector, both for revenues and for food security. Sadly, this vulnerable secto r was immensely affected. As such, we call on Members to consider the African Group’s proposals for: i) a permanent solution on public stockholding , ii) a substantial reduction of trade distorting domestic support measures , iii) a reform of SSM to make it more accessible to developing countries and LDCs , iv) an outcome on the existing proposal on agricultural export prohibitions on WFP , and v) a reduction of product specific cotton AMS supports to de -minimis level. 8.65. The repre sentative of Chile provided the following statement : 8.66. I request that our delegation's statements at the meetings you mentioned be incorporated into the record of this meeting, as well as those delivered in relation to this matter at the Trade Negotiations C ommittee last Friday.15 Under Ambassador Walker we will have a single formal process that should lead us towards an ambitious and balanced deliverable , providing a real and effective response to the pandemic , while also serving as a lesson for future pande mics, especially in areas specific to and falling within the competence of the WTO. Canada's Trade and Health Initiative, which we co -sponsor, contains the elements in relation to which the WTO can deliver concrete solutions to improve access to vaccines a nd other medical inputs. We highlight, inter alia, disciplines in the area of export restrictions and similar measures; notification commitments; customs and trade facilitation measures, including through the Trade Facilitation Agreement; and regulatory me asures. This initiative is a solid basis for starting work on a text for the declaration to be signed by our Ministers at the end of the year. In this regard, we appreciate Chinese Taipei's contribution, which provides a good potential structure for this m inisterial declaration. The Trade and Health Initiative is just one of many existing documents and declarations. 8.67. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the work of the Ambassadors of Jamaica and Singapore and their valuable written contribut ion. All of these documents have something in common: they reaffirm our strong conviction that the WTO has a central role in combating and 15 The statement delivered by Chile 23 July Informal TNC and Informal HODs meeting is annexed to the Minutes of this meeting . WT/GC/M/19 2 - 62 - recovering from this and future pandemics. Given the number of documents, we support the working structure presented by Ambassador Walker. At some point, this work should be brought together with the Director General's process – the so -called Third Way – which now has its own course and is being supported with ide as from the Trade and Health Initiative. In our view, it will be particularly important for the process upon which we have embarked, and which will be led by Ambassador Walker, to produce short -, medium - and long -term deliverables, i.e. before, during and after the upcoming Ministerial Conference, considering the diverse nature of the current issues. We have faith in the Facilitator to work expeditiously , in view of the short amount of time remaining. 8.68. One issue that the Facilitator and the Trade and Health Initiative have expressly left to follow its own course is that of intellectual property aspects. For Chile, this is a key aspect. The IP pillar has its own forum and this morning we attended the debate based on the report by the TRIPS Council Chair , for which we are grateful. It is important that the discussions in this Council continue on the basis of constructive negotiations, conducted in good faith and aimed at achieving an outcome that is effective and genuinely leads to an increase in vaccine produc tion capacity. An agreement that fails to deliver an effective response and is also difficult for Members to implement , will certainly not be of use to the WTO 's pandemic response. 8.69. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement: 8.70. On agenda items 7 and 8, Colombia is of the view that the Initiative on Trade and Health is very positive, and supports discussions on a practical and effective WTO response to the pandemic. This is a multi -dimensional issue and the response to this crisis must make use of the various tools offered by trade policy. We welcome and support the work undertaken by Ambassador Walker as Facilitator in these discussions, as well as that of Ambassadors Spencer and Tan. The document compiling the elements gleaned in the consultations certainly reflects the fact that the response to the crisis invo lves various elements, from trade facilitation and regulatory cooperation to measures on export restrictions. 8.71. On this matter, we wish to draw attention to document WT/GC/W/826 circulated by a group of six Latin American countries, which reflects the profound concern regarding a number of trade practices that hinder and limit the importation of vaccines, thereby depriving our citizens of timely and equitable access to these goods. This document puts forward concrete ideas to improve the collective resp onse to the pandemic through the tools of the multilateral trading system. We particularly stress the need to multilaterally address the discussion on more comprehensive and firmer actions to avoid restrictions on exports, and in particular on vaccines and their components. The WTO holds a piece to the puzzle , that is the global response to the pandemic, and it is up to us to take collective and coordinated action for the benefit of all. The issue of trade and health should form part of the Ministerial outc omes and, to that end, Colombia stands ready to engage actively in the various discussions and thematic dialogues with a view to achieving convergence between the visions and proposals. 8.72. The representative of Australia provided the following statement: 8.73. We support Canada 's statement on the Trade and Health Initiative ; and we note that, as Canada said, the Trade and Health Initiative is not an exhaustive proposal. I wanted to add that it’s not an onerous one either. It aims to reinforce the norms and values to which we have all committed , and it is not about making new rules or setting new onerous obligations. 8.74. The representative of Brunei Darussalam provided the following statement: 8.75. As one of the co -sponsors, Brunei Darussalam aligns itself with the s tatement they have just delivered. We joined this proposal because we believe that it is important to have a strong response from the WTO on the COVID -19 pandemic, particularly for MC12, to demonstrate that the WTO still remains relevant and credible today , and that it has a real and central role to play in the global economic recovery. As a country that had little to no manufacturing or production of essential medical equipment such as PPE, we were one of those that were affected at the start of the pandem ic by export restrictions, so we strongly see the merit of a united position on this. We believe the proposal achieves this in a balanced manner, by emphasizing the importance of transparency and focusing on dialogue. In our view , the pandemic has shown us the importance of working together. In an unprecedented show of cooperation, the world has come together not just between countries, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 63 - but also with organi zations and industry. We are therefore also pleased to see that the proposal highlights this, particul arly by pledging our commitment to work together with other organi zations and institutions. The emergence of the multitude of variants of the COVID -19 virus also show that the pandemic is not over, and that other iterations may come up again in future. We need to consider what work needs to be done to prepare for such a situation in future. All of us here have agreed that there should be an outcome at MC12 on the WTO 's response to the pandemic. We believe that the proposal for a decision by Ministers to est ablish a work programme on pandemic preparedness as envisaged by this proposal should thus be one of the outcomes. Brunei Darussalam therefore remains committed to continue supporting this initiative, and encourages other WTO Members to also join and support it, so we can have a strong and unified statement on trade and health. 8.76. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 8.77. CARICOM aligns itself with the statement delivered by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP. T he most critical issues for CARICOM currently are the continuing need for equitable access to vaccines as well as how to treat the emerging COVID variants. We take note of the various contributions to the multilateral process on the WTO response to the COV ID-19 pandemic. We also observe that there are dozens of proposals from Members, all of them well intentioned and in several instances, overlapping. We thank Members for the various submissions under this agenda item 8. CARICOM believes that WTO Members sh ould be open to all possible solutions to combat the pandemic, including unblocking supply chains, enhancing manufacturing capacity, invoking appropriate intellectual property flexibilities, and enhancing trade facilitation measures among others. At some point, Members may also want to see how best they can streamline their various approaches and proceed under an omnibus framework , to both reduce the risk of bifurcating pathways and reduce the burden on small delegations to participate meaningfully in the v arious conversations. We renew our call to WTO Members to remove export restrictions, particularly export prohibitions or bans on drugs and medical devices for the treatment of COVID -19, as well as inputs needed for vaccines and therapeutics. We also call on Members not to introduce new restrictive measures. Members are also reminded to be mindful of their transparency and notification obligations. 8.78. The representative of India provided the following statement: 8.79. Under item 7 , on the issue of Appellate Body , we believe that Members should re -engage. We support the process for necessary reforms that would restore the two -tier DSB. On the issue of WTO reforms, we need to look at the proposals submitted by Members in that regard and agree on the common elements that could constitute reform package. Then only we can discuss the process for working on the reform proposal package. My delegation does not support setting up of a Working Group, as being suggested. On para 3.17 issues, our view is that, d uring a pandemic year when our attention should be fully devoted to delivering a robust response to the pandemic, taking up other issues will be a distraction and we should avoid doing that for MC12. As suggested earlier, we reiterate our request for inclu ding a section on the status of past MC deliverables in the MC12 document. We are running short of time and it is high time that we quickly identify the agenda items which we want to pursue for delivery at MC12, so that we can come back and focus on them immediately after the summer break. Also, having a clarity on the format of the meeting – virtual or in-person – will help delegations to effectively prepare for the Ministerial. 8.80. On the WTO’s response to the pandemic , we note that there are many proposed d eliverables, but we should avoid those that are openly trying to push the market access agenda and aim to take away the policy space available for Members and also impose cumbersome obligations that serve to benefit a few in the name of pandemic. No doubt, we need to work on supply -chain bottlenecks. However, doing away with the legitimate policy instrument of export restrictions or aiming to make a temporary elimination of tariffs a permanent measure or calling for stringent transparency obligations , will not guarantee access to vaccines, therapeutics or diagnostics or access to food for the most vulnerable. In fact, such a step is likely to lead to a flight of these critical final finished products to the highest bidder, making them inaccessible to the res ource -poor, further aggravating the current divide which we are seeing. 8.81. On the waiver proposal, as few Members were successful in delaying the landing zone beyond July, I wish to reiterate that there is an urgent need to engage in the text -based negotiati ons and finalise the waiver request to be adopted by MC12. The WTO's response to the pandemic will not be fulfilled without an agreement on the waiver. Millions have regressed deeper into poverty during this pandemic , and their food security is another cri tical issue for this organization. A simple, efficient, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 64 - and permanent solution on extending PSH for food security purposes to new programs and new products is therefore a key deliverable. In this regard, we once again reiterate that the new submissions by the Africa n Group and the proposal being worked upon by G33 are a good basis for CoASS to take the process forward. We also urge for a multilateral outcome on the movement of healthcare professionals, particularly in view of the current pandemic. We need t o be aware of new forms of trade barriers in the name of a "selective use of vaccine certificate s", and find ways to resolve them . 8.82. Under item 8 , we thank the co -sponsors for their update on the submission WT/GC/W/823 calling for measures facilitating trade in essential medical goods, including vaccines to respond to the current COVID -19 related challenges in international trade. We also thank propon ents of WT/GC/231 and WT/GC/W/822. Certain measures highlighted in these submissions can help in keeping the supply chains open, in transportation of raw materials and distribution of final goods , and are welcome. These are one part of the solution. Howeve r, unless the supply options are diversified by mobilising the global manufacturing capacity, by making the IP, know -how and technology openly accessible to all potential manufacturers, we cannot resolve the challenge of the COVID -19 pandemic. The rules an d agreements inked for a normal situation, not keeping in mind a disaster or pandemic situation, will not deliver the desired and effective outcomes. We are disappointed with most of the contents of the present proposal. An effective response to C OVID -19 comprises of not only scaling up production, but also to make them affordable and accessible. That can happen only after billions of doses are produced affordably and made available to everyone. In order to achieve this goal, we need to ensure that intellec tual property rights do not restrict a rapid scaling up of manufacturing. The co -sponsors have engaged in good faith and positively in the text - based negotiations for a TRIPS waiver , and we are keen to continue to engage for a TRIPS waiver , to remove barri ers and create greater freedom to operate , so that capacity all over the world can be mobilised. The need of the hour is to go beyond the ordinary and take extraordinary measures to combat the challenge . In this regard , it is naïve to believe that a mere r eiteration of existing TRIPS provisions would provide the legal certainty to existing flexibilities , when we have clearly seen for a fact that neither existing TRIPS flexibilities nor reliance on voluntary mechanisms have yielded any significant result so far. 8.83. While highlighting preventing further disruptions in the supply chains of essential medical goods, the submission misses out a very significant element of the COVID -19 response. It talks about facilitating the movement of goods , including medical pro ducts, but it is silent on facilitating the movement of healthcare and other professionals and liberalising measures on that front. While the proposal calls for removing export restrictions, let me emphasise here that export restrictions are a legitimate d ual use policy tool. During a pandemic where we are not working in perfect market condition s, export restrictions will be used unless we correct the supply side. We have used this tool to ensur e equitable distribution of critical medicines, diagnostic kits, ventilators and personal protective equipment to more than 150 countries , based on mutually assessed needs , in the absence of which the entire supply of finished products might have been corne red by the rich and privileged lot with deep pockets. 8.84. On elimination or reduction of tariff s, Members have been calibrating tariffs unilaterally to achiev e their policy objectives, including access to medical products for its citizen s. India has also mode rated its tariffs on such products during the pandemic. On cooperation of the WTO with other organizations, we welcome the proposal and are willing to discuss it further with the proponents. Any binding measure on additional transparency will only come in the way of a successful integration of trade and health, particularly during a pandemic. In conclusion, Chair, we need to be mindful that lives and livelihoods are being lost while we continue to debate the WTO's response to the pandemic. We need to take r ealistic and pragmatic action now to protect the credibility of this organi zation. 8.85. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 8.86. We are pleased to continue this important discussion – how the WTO can contribute to our recovery from the pandemic. The WTO has a very good story to tell about its role during the pandemic , and so do its Members. Our predecessors may not have had a global pandemic at front of mind when they negotiated GATT rules, but they were remarkably succ essful. The balance they struck between Members ' rights and obligations, including by providing for certain flexibilities for governments during crises, has worked, and continues to help us navigate this long crisis. By and large, Members have acted respon sibly with respect to trade during the pandemic , with little evidence of protectionism. A few statistics help illustrate this. During the crisis, trade facilitating WT/GC/M/19 2 - 65 - measures outnumbered trade restrictive measures by nearly two -to-one, and in value terms, a bout 3.5 to 1. Members appear to be lifting trade restrictive measures when they judge they are no longer necessary. We are still afflicted by the pandemic – yet as conditions have slowly improved, in fits and starts, restrictive measures are being removed – nearly 60 per cent already, according to a recent count. And while merchandise trade fell 8 per cent last year, trade in medical goods surged, with trade in PPE up about 50 percent. Moreover, when Members see concerns, we have WTO committees and council s to discuss and monitor these developments, such as the Committee on Market Access. Still, there are lessons to be learned. For example, in the United States, we painfully learned that we did not have essential products where we needed them, when we neede d them. 8.87. Moving forward, our focus is on building secure, resilient, and diversified supply chains. We will evaluate any proposal at the WTO in part based on whether it advances that objective. We will also approach coming conversations with pragmatism and realism. That means being pragmatic and realistic about where consensus is possible, and where it is not. For example, we do not believe that consensus is possible on ideas that aim to narrow or otherwise burden Members ' flexibility in responding to emerg encies. In fact, it would be a grave and short -sighted misjudgement to attempt this. We do not see consensus as possible on proposals that call for increasing Secretariat monitoring of Members ' trade measures, or of their supply chains, or calls to empower the Secretariat to undertake work with other organizations , that is not Member -driven. Instead, we urge Members to begin work by focusing on a topic where consensus seems possible. Let 's start with something small but pragmatic and build around it. If we find there is sufficient agreement, we can build further. As a first topic for focus, we recommend working to accelerate the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement. Certain provisions could make a real positive impact on essential goods moving across borders more quickly. If we make strides, we can examine other possible trade facilitating measures. If we start in this small and pragmatic way, and build from there, we’ll have a chance to succeed. 8.88. The representative of Vanuatu , on behalf of the P acific Group , provided the following statement: 8.89. Our Group considers this initiative, a WTO Response to the Pandemic , as both critical and urgent and a priority for MC12 . Vanuatu is a co -sponsor of the WT/GC/W/823, Draft General Council Declaration on Trade and Health – COVID -19 and Beyond. The Pacific Group also considers this proposal on Trade and Health as an important response to COVID -19 and to future pandemics. The Draft G eneral Council Decision outlines five measures which Members can take to combat the ongoing pandemic and to respond to future pandemics. Most of these elements are not new and come from existing WTO Agreements. The prompt notification would ensure the transparency of trade measures imposed by Members and should be e ncouraged. Trade facilitation would facilitate the efficient distribution of essential goods. Standards must address mutual recognition of vaccines and vaccine certificates. However, on export restrictions, the situation of import -dependent Members, such a s those of the Pacific Group , should be taken into account in this Draft Decision , to ensure they are not denied the supply of essential products during times of health crises. The Pacific Group is open to engage in discussions on this Draft Decision as we ll as other proposals. 8.90. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 8.91. On item 7, t he European Union will be engaging fully and contributing to the discussions ahead of us to prepare for MC12. The European Union would like to raise an issue of concern. We are two months and a half away from MC12 , and a number of thematic sessions are pla nned in various areas : fisheries, the response to the pandemic, intellectual property, agriculture and other issues. What is missing in our view is a clear roadmap on how these different strands will be organi zed and come together in a process to deliver a n outcome for MC12. It would therefore be useful to have a clear roadmap for our work in the autumn on the basis of an agenda that is feasible and realistic. 8.92. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 8.93. On item 7, a s a co -sponsor of the proposed General Coun cil Declaration, presented by Canada for the Ottawa Group, Japan supports a holistic approach that not only deals with the usual export restrictions and trade facilitation, but also addresses the expansion of production of vaccines and therapeutics, which has increasingly become an issue. This approach will ensure that the WTO can also contribute to preparing for future pandemics. We believe the proposed Declaration will be a WT/GC/M/19 2 - 66 - good basis for achieving a positive outcome at MC12 and call f or more Members to support this draft Declaration. Japan also appreciates the European Union and Taiwan for submitting their respective proposal s. Japan will engage in the process by Ambassador Walker to forge an outcome for MC12. 8.94. The representative of Argentina provided the following statement: 8.95. We thank Ambassador Walker for his report and reiterate Argentina's support for his work. We agree on the importance of making the WTO's response to the pandemic an MC12 outcome, which had to be achieved in a transparent, open and inclusive manner. All the initiatives that have been addressed today under item 8 of the agenda are important and h ave many points of contact. It is therefore necessary and logical to channel these particular efforts into a collective outcome. At the same time, we recognize that these initiatives succeeded in attracting only a fraction of the membership and we understa nd that they contain elements that not all of us are in a position to accept. Argentina believes that all of the proposed solutions have to be analysed against a background of an imbalance in access to vaccines and treatments. We must, therefore, be able t o reach agreements that will bring us closer to the ambitious goal of ensuring equitable access to vaccines and treatments in order to end the pandemic. Furthermore, any outcome must be consistent with WTO rules, without altering acquired rights or prejudg ing future agreements or negotiations, reaffirming existing trade policy tools to address the pandemic. Important elements on the subject discussed in the framework of the G20 could serve as a reference and we understand that the different circumstances, e fforts and challenges faced by developing countries must be taken into account. Lastly, we believe that any calls, suggestions and/or recommendations that emerge should also be addressed to the private sector, which has a key role to play in all aspects re lating to the production and distribution of goods and inputs, including with regard to access to health technologies. 8.96. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement : 8.97. On item 7, Paraguay welcomes the presentation of document RD/GC/14. We agree that it is important to focus efforts so that the WTO may produce a response to the COVID -19 pandemic as soon as possible. Paraguay has participated in the consultations of the Group of Latin American and Caribbean Countries (GRULAC) wit h Ambassadors Tang and Spencer in order to make progress in the sub working group established for this purpose. Further to the statement delivered jointly at the May General Council by Colombia and Paraguay on behalf of a number of Latin American and Caribbean delegations, we have circulated a communication in document WT/GC/W/826 of 26 July, which is co -sponsored by the delegations of Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Panama, the Dominican Republic and Paraguay. This document puts forward additional elements that we ask to be taken into account in the process led by Ambassador Walker, and we therefore request its inclusion in the report RD/GC/14. We consider that our contribution contains deliverables that could be explored by the WTO, particularly in relation to export restrictions, trade facilitation, services and regulatory harmonization, with a view to ensuring improved and more equitable access to vaccines. 8.98. Similarly, we welcome all the contributions submitted under item 8. With respect to those submissio ns containing intellectual property elements, we would like to highlight that we have actively participated in the discussions in the TRIPS Council and are following this debate closely. Paraguay is a country that does not have the capacity to produce vacc ines locally, for which reason it is crucial for our delegation to find a consensus solution that enables us to import and gain immediate and effective access to COVID -19 vaccines through the tools available to us in the WTO toolbox. 8.99. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement: 8.100. We are certain that trade and the WTO will be called on to play a key role in addressing this pandemic and into the future. Costa Rica, together with other Latin American countries, has listed a series of actions to achieve this objective in document WT/GC/W/826, circulated yesterday and to which reference has already been made. The actions proposed in this document complement other discussions on trade and health in this organization, including other proposals presented as part of this agenda item, as well as the efforts made by the Director General to foster dialogues with different actors. We see synergies and complementarity in these initiatives and will work constructively to achieve an outcome on this issue at MC12 under Ambassador Walker's leadership. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 67 - We request that Costa Rica be added to the list of proponents of the draft declaration entitled "COVID 19 and Beyond: Trade and Health" (WT/GC/W/823). 8.101. The representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement: 8.102. Under item 7, let me suggest some ideas which could be used in our further work. First, measures to be taken should be consistent with the identifie d challenges. The WTO analytical efforts recently brought some fruit s, resulting, inter alia, in the Indicative List of Trade-Related Bottlenecks to Combat COVID -19. We believe that the 20 July document calls for our in -depth study to clearly identify the full set of problems, which can be resolved through decision -making at the Ministerial level within the WTO. The joint WTO -WHO Conference, organized by Dr Ngozi and Dr Ghebreyesus on 21 July, with the participation of pharmaceutical companies, was also quite useful in terms of identifying major challenges. This event also allowed to compare the views of the participants with the initiatives we are discussing today. Such a comparison make s it clear that several measures suggested in those papers are not s een by the major public and private stakeholders as most relevant and urgent. In fact, the message coming from major stakeholders was quite clear: the best possible way to meet the global demand is through maximizing operational and production effectivenes s of producers. The success of such approach shows through a significantly rising number of vaccines produced over time. At the Conference, some companies referred to discrimination based on the country of origin of the vaccine and specifically pointed out that obstructions in registering certain vaccines create massive problems for business. 8.103. Second, we should identify areas that fall within competence of the WTO, and among those , problems which can effectively addressed through joint commitments and colle ctive efforts. Such bottlenecks as burdensome regulatory approvals, insufficient TFA implementation and lack of transparency of trade regimes , evidently fall under this category. We don’t think it’s a good idea to include into the list of possible MC12 out comes , decisions which have nothing to do with the WTO mandate or empty political slogans. The public may interpret it as a sign of inability of our organization to provide effective input in the global efforts to fight the pandemic. 8.104. Third, we should take into account the ongoing initiatives and discussions in the WTO, which have a direct link to the COVID -19 response efforts. Besides negotiations within the TRIPS Council, those include effective implementation of the TFA and increasing transparency of tra de regime, i.e. in the area of applied tariffs. It is also important that we address not only the movement of vaccines, but also the expansion of their production. Investment policies play a key role in creating conducive, non-discriminatory and rules -based global environment for increasing international cooperation on vaccine manufacturing, and promoting an efficient organization of their production globally. Favourable investment climate in the recipient countries is essential in this regard. Facilitation of investments could significantly contribute to its improvement. Fourth, we should separate measures that must be taken urgently and proposals of a systemic nature, aimed at the long term. The latter could be translated into a working program, approved a t MC12. 8.105. The representative of Ecuador provided the following statement: 8.106. We welcome the proposals that Members have submitted under this agenda item . We believe that these proposals contain relevant proposals that can be part of an ambitious pragmatic poli cy on trade and health to help us address this and future pandemics. Chairperson, this is not a local or regional crisis, this is a global crisis which will impact us all . As a result, the COVID -19 pandemic response must adopt a holistic global effective and urgent response and this organization will clearly play a key role on this. As for the trade and health WTO response , all national efforts made by countries are insufficient in the short term. We must remove all barriers to trade preventing a ccess to medication and COVID -19 vaccination and components . As Ecuador has already mentioned , it will take years for us to overcome this crisis and we need to address this crisis urgently , so that we are prepared for future crisis. We need to bear in mind joint action amongst all international stakeholders , including governments, international organizations, pharmaceutical corporations, financial organizations and institutions and universities. We welcome the D irector General 's efforts to have an ongoing d ialogue with various stakeholders to identify what we can do in the WTO . We support the dialogue , and we are certain that it will continue to be inclusive and broad, bearing in mind the needs of all, including those countries which depend on vaccine import s. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 68 - 8.107. As Colombia, Paraguay and Costa Rica have already mentioned , yesterday , alongside other Members from our region, we circulated document WT/ GC/W/826, which includes tangible actions which the WTO must bear in mind in its COVID -19 response. This document aims to constructively contribute to discussions on trade and health underway at the WTO, promote various collaborations and international solidarity to ensure universal guaranteed vaccine access due to the joint efforts of all states, call s for the immed iate elimination of all export restrictions and barriers to COVID -19 vaccine distribution , and to ensure trade policy that helps us to bolster global vaccination. 8.108. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 8.109. Under item 7 , we re-iterate the points we made at the TNC on MC12. We thank Ambassador Walker for his report. As well as Ambassadors Tan and Spencer for their efforts. We agree that the WTO response to COVID -19 is the most important issue for the WTO for MC12. I will high light the following: MC12 is being held under challenging circumstances , when the world is grappling with an unprecedented pandemic of our lifetime , that is wreaking havoc across the globe with a disproportionate impact on health, economy and livelihoods i n developing countries. A business -as- usual approach and a trade liberalization agenda in not realistic. We must define priorities that will determine a credible outcome. The WTO response to COVID -19 is key and the TRIPS Waiver is a necessary temporary, ta rgeted and proportionate component for any outcome on a WTO response to COVID -19. We should not wait for MC12 to save lives. Economic recovery and a development - oriented agenda will go a long way in building resilience and inclusive growth and development. Agriculture has to be part of an outcome and the deliverables must centre on a food security and livelihood package. Lastly is a Fisheries outcome that is balanced and delivers on the mandate – we underscore that a Fisheries only outcome is not sufficient . On MC12, a Ministerial Declaration should cover multilaterally mandated issues if we want to reach consensus. We must also acknowledge that Members have different views on WTO reform, so we must think carefully what can be reflected that sets a balanced forward -looking agenda. The Declaration should also re -affirm multilateralism and the multilateral character of the WTO and the principles that underpin the WTO. 8.110. In relation to item 8 , the membership of the WTO agrees that the biggest challenge we face in the fight against the COVID -19 pandemic is the limited or insufficient supply of essential vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics and that this requires the ramping up of production. We commend the Director -General on the various initiatives she has spear headed, particularly the meetings and engagements in different formats with an assortment of stakeholders, including sister organizations towards finding practical solutions to these supply constraints. A clear and consistent message from these engagements was the confirmation of the existence of under -utilized manufacturing capacity available in developing countries that can contribute to the solution. It is also clear that we all recognize the role of the transfer of intellectual property , technology and know -how was the need to boost and diversify global production, including in developing countries. South Africa welcomes the recent announcements of partnerships between pharmaceutical companies with the South African -based Biovac Institute and Aspen for vaccine manufacturing, and hope that these arrangements will contribute towards resolving the supply challenge on the African Continent. This is a positive step, but still falls short in resolving the current supply con straints facing the continent. 8.111. In relation to the Trade and Health Initiative, there are some useful elements , such as cooperation among international organi zations , that we can consider as we look at a WTO response to COVID -19. We also agree with a need for a comprehensive response to the pandemic. We support calls for Members to exercise restraint in introducing new restrictions and prohibitions on the exportation of COVID - 19 vaccines and other essential medical products necessary to combat the COVID -19 pandemic and the need to re -affirm the G20 principles that emergency measures designed to tackle COVID -19, if deemed necessary, must be "targeted, proportionate, transparent, and temporary," and should be "consistent with WTO rules." However, we also ackn owledge that a focus on trade aspects without addressing IP barriers will not be sufficient in ramping up production. We believe the most sustainable way to address export restrictions is by addressing the shortages by ramping up production. The TRIPS Waiv er is a core element of any WTO response to the pandemic. 8.112. Some of the proposals venture into trade liberalization which we find problematic in the context of a crisis, while some of the measures are initially temporary, the Trade and Health Initiative for example states that Members will consider to what extent some of the measures can be made permanent. We will need all the policy tools to address the strategic vulnerability of Africa associated with over -reliance on imports. We would also be concerned wi th a proposal of unilateral trade facilitative measures implemented in the context of this crisis must be converted into permanent WT/GC/M/19 2 - 69 - commitments. We need to ensure that the interventions we take in the context of the pandemic do not close the door to any fut ure industrialization ambitions that developing countries would have in production of essential health products. We would not support disciplines on export taxes. Export taxes are allowed by the WTO rules applicable to most WTO Members and have been used t o encourage value -added processing. 8.113. We are also concerned with proposals on fast -tracking the TFA without any support to developing countries and LDCs who had in their commitments identified aspects they will need support for in order to implement. The Tr ade and Health proposal is offering no new aid to enable accelerated implementation of the TFA, especially when so many LDCs and developing countries are facing major challenges with their fiscal space in light of the pandemic. 8.114. We need a C OVID package, pu rsued on parallel and mutually reinforcing tracks, done pragmatically and covering five areas: i) scale -up production in different and additional parts of the world. This necessitates effective transfer of technology, sharing of know -how, backward integrat ion of the raw materials and distribution rights. It must unlock productive capacity not just fill and finish; ii) a timebound and targeted TRIPS waiver covering essential diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics; iii) protocols covering transparency of cont racts and price stability undertakings; iv) a commitment to avoid resort ing to vaccine nationalism and this should include a commitment to release and equitably distribute excess doses and end vaccine nationalism and "vaccine diplomacy "; and v) a TRIPS pro vision dealing specifically with future pandemics, that provides automatic rights of use and obviates the need for special arrangements and waivers. 8.115. The two missing elements in the thematic areas as covered by Ambassador Walker in our view are food securi ty and livelihoods and economic recovery which must complement the trade related aspects. A clear determination to develop a sustainable policy environment that will facilitate the development and rebuilding of industries to foster resilience against any f uture pandemics, especially in developing countries , is critical. Economic recovery and a development -oriented agenda will go a long way in building resilience and inclusive growth and development. We do nevertheless agree with some elements of the submission (WT/GC/W/822), but only in as far as it calls for the safeguarding of the policy space of developing countries to allow them to rebuild better and foster resilience against future shocks and pandemics. We remain ready to engage with all the prop onents of the proposals to find landing zones. 8.116. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 8.117. My statement relates to items 7 and 8. Switzerland is pleased to co -sponsor the very important initiative that Canada presented. We are conv inced that a cross -cutting approach is necessary to bring an end to the COVID -19 pandemic and to address future pandemics. Our aim is to ensure development as well as equitable and fair access to essential medical products , including vaccinations. In this vein, we wish to warmly thank the D irector -General for her work and for co - organising the various successful events on 21 July which aimed to consider how to step -up production of COVID -19 vaccines and ensure equitable access. The debate at this event unde rscored the need to preserve and bolster the operations of the supply chains and to ensure cooperation between the public, private and organizational sectors. The draft proposal presented today by Canada provides pragmatic and key solutions including disci plines on export restriction s, trade facilitation and additional transparency , not only in terms of trade -related measures but also in terms of overseeing the value chains. We encourage all WTO Members to welcome this initiative and consider participating therein. 8.118. The representative of Singapore provided the following statement: 8.119. Allow me to make three points, first, it has become clear that Members want to deliver an outcome related to trade and health at MC12 as the emergence of new variants has caused a surge in the number of COVID -19 cases globally, there is greater urgency for the WTO to deliver tangible outcomes that can contribute towards the global fight against the pandemic. Second, it is critically important that we ensure that the WTO response to the COVID -19 pandemic adopt a forward -looking approach. In this context, while the various proposals seek to address some of the challenges caused by the current COVID -19 pandemic, it must also ensure that the WTO will be able to respond to future pandemics. It is important for us to continue finding ways to exercise existing flex ibilities within the WTO framework. Third, it is worth reemphasizing that no single proposal can be the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 70 - panacea to solve all the current challenges in addressing the COVID -19 pandemic. For example, the contribution of the trade and health declaration is sp ecific, the declaration is designed to address trade -related impediments to the flow of essential medical products including diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics and sets up practical actions that Members can take that we have learned from the 21 July WT O-WHO High Level Dialogue, the common refrain we have heard from vaccine manufacturers is that vaccine supply chain bottlenecks lack of regulatory harmonization and export restrictions pose the greatest challenges to access to vaccine distribution and prod uction. To address these issues, the E uropean Union's communication has proposed to facilitate the use of compulsory licensing to scale up the production and distribution of vaccines. We see these various initiatives as being complementary to other ongoing workstreams, including the D irector General 's Third Way, the discussions at the TRIPS Council and the facilitator -led process. The challenge is how can we synergize all these workstreams in order to produce a meaningful deliverable at MC12. In closing, I wish to join the other cosponsors in encouraging other WTO Members to support the Trade and Health Declaration. 8.120. The representative of Honduras provided the following statement: 8.121. The document circulated yesterday by Latin American co -sponsors helps to raise awareness about what is happening in our region and worldwide , especially when it comes to the challenges that developing countries face when it comes to equal and fair access to vaccines. This is a global challenge , and we need to assure effective vaccine distribution to ensure that all countries have equal access to medication and vaccines. We must have a debate followed by concrete actions. 8.122. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 8.123. My statement will address both items 7 and 8. Given the broad nature of the proposals, we are still studying all the proposals on the table but allow me to make a broad preliminary observation on some of the proposals. First, we would like to recall that we support having a holistic and coherent approach for an outcome that brings all elements in the areas concerned, including reducing trade barriers, facilitating trade, increasing production and distribution of vaccines and IP and technology transfer issues. Second, on the proposal on the trade and health initiative, we share the view that we need to avoid export restrictions on essential medical goods, especially vaccines, therapeutics diagnostics and other critical medical products and the raw materials dur ing this pandemic. However, we are also of the view that export restrictions and also tariff and trade facilitation are not the only issues that limit the production of critical medical products to ensure equity of access globally. If there are only a few companies producing essential medical products and raw materials and equipment, how then can we adequately ensure that those companies increase the production. If the output of these companies is still the same regardless of any elimination or reduction of export restriction or tariff barriers, how then this proposal helps us to address the access issue for many developing and LDC countries. Hence, we are not convinced that this proposal will help take upon all the issue s of global access for medical produc ts, that we are badly in need of. Third, on the communication concerning our urgent trade policy response, we respectfully disagree with the proposal that says that IP is not hindering global access, it is obvious that monopolistic protection of products t hat have public health impact will always have a side effect , both in price and accessibility. 8.124. On vaccines, our position is very clear that we want every vaccine manufacturer to be able to produce COVID -19 vaccines to tackle this pandemic as soon as possible , and at the same time it is unacceptable that the Global South is to wait for years to have access to lifesaving products , while some other countries can now lessen the ir restrictive measures. The proposal 's assertion that the main issue is only p roviding adequate and equal manufacturing capacity , globally ensuring sufficient raw material and equipment , is far from reality. We understand that voluntary licensing during this time could be given to a manufacturer that has never produced any vaccine a t all. Hence whenever a manufacturer is willing to provide a transfer of technology and know -how to other established manufacturer in the developing world then there would be a significant chance that the established manufacturer in the Global South could deliver vaccines without delays. 8.125. Concerning compulsory licensing, the EU proposal fall s short from its promise to address export restriction s. If the E uropean Union wants to address export restriction s with its proposal on compulsory licensing , we would suggest that Article 51 of the TRIPS Agreement is inapplicable during the global pandemic. We would like to underline that relying on securing voluntary licensing and market mechanisms during the global health crisis will never address the issue of global h ealth. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 71 - Finally, we should avoid any discussion on a permanent elimination of tariff s under the WTO response to the COVID -19 pandemic , bearing in mind the importance of tariff s as border taxes for some developing and LDCs. 8.126. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement: 8.127. Under item 8(a) we look at the Trade and Health Initiative contained in WT/GC/W/823, with interest , and note the wide and diverse co -sponsorship that it has attracted. The Philippines will be prepared to engag e with the proponents in further discussions. 8.128. The representative of Kazakhstan provided the following statement: 8.129. The Ministerial Decision on the WTO's response to COVID -19 should consist of two major parts. One should be the Ministerial Decision on immedi ate and short -term trade policy to address the COVID -19 pandemic. The second part should be a work plan, elaborating a comprehensive and systemic response to future pandemics. With regard to the first part, the paper presented by Canada on behalf of group of Members could serve as a good basis. 8.130. I also would like to address the concerns mentioned by some Members regarding the import tariffs or other measures ' liberalization being on a permanent basis, as well as some services or market access measures. Based on the experience which we are facing now and which we have faced in early months of pandemic , when we were all facin g shortages of medical supplies and now we are facing also shortages of vaccines , export restrictions are very important . With regard to import measures, such as trade facilitation or tariffs relaxation or removal on a temporary basis, it is up to each gov ernment , because its they who need these medical supplies, vaccines ; as well as a temporary liberalization of services if there are any barriers these are also required to make possible the movement of goods. National governments and Members should be doin g that for their own, in order to address their own national needs, not to address global trade policy issues. These measures should be temporary , without a permanent market access liberalization in services and goods , and there should be an immediate resp onse on trade policy measures by Ministers at MC12. 8.131. I would like to make another point in terms of timeframe for our interventions. We are sitting today and addressing items 7 and 8 of the agenda , which consist of 20 agenda items, and it is already 8:10 pm. Many of the Ambassadors who also represent their countries to the United Nations know about the limits we have in the Human Rights Council. We have Human Rights Council sessions three times a year , which last for three weeks, not two days as General Cou ncil meetings, and depending on the number of interventions to be made, we are given either two minutes or one and a half minute s for our interventions. For the future General Council meetings, if we do not have new arguments, any creative or innovative solution , then we should limit our interventions to certain timeframes which you, the General Council Chair, based on your consultations with Members , could let us know for future General Council sessions. 8.132. The representative of Mongolia provided the following statement: 8.133. On both items 7 and 8, Mongolia would like to especially signal the following points in the response to the pandemic : the pandemic has brought and continues to bring about unprece dented disruptions to global economy's supply chains . Border measures, SPS and other measures aim at curbing the speed the disease impacts economies . Efficient transit and effective trade facilitation are becoming more critical today . Long waiting times at border s, caused by tight border restrictions , have a significant negative impact on trade and trade costs. Even situations when thousands sometimes hundreds of kilometres of trucks being stuck for days and weeks at border crossing points, also ha ve a nega tive impact on the environment and sustainability. We welcome the view that the WTO's response to pandemic should be addressed in collaboration with other international organizations in support of the smooth functioning of transit, transport and trade corr idors, and ensuring freedom of transit. I would like to suggest adding the World Customs Organization to that list of organizations mentioned by the facilitator Ambassador Walker , another important organization in order to secure smooth trade facilitation measures. 8.134. The representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 72 - 8.135. On the WTO's response to the COVID -19 pandemic, we highly appreciate and welcome your leading efforts as well as the report by Ambassador Walker, which we hope will lead us to a meaningful outcome on this urgent matter by MC12. I would like to thank the D irector -General for her engagement and cooperation with other international organizati ons; the high -level dialogue with vaccine producers across the globe was a really useful forum. We think we should capitalize on that momentum and continue such a useful dialogue. 8.136. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 8.137. We will address both items 7 and 8 along with all their sub -items together. We thank you for your statement and efforts to advance preparations for MC12. With only four months to go, we need to urgently address many questions – not least on the format and mec hanics of the M inisterial Conference, which will no doubt pose a challenge. The recently concluded Ministerial TNC Meeting on Fisheries was a novel step , but has alerted us to the many pitfalls , including technological glitches, time zones and interpretati on difficulties such a format could present at the M inisterial Conference . To this end, we wish to stress the importance of full and equal participation of all Ministers across a uniform format. 8.138. We also wish to thank Ambassador Walker for his efforts as f acilitator on a WTO response to the pandemic. We hope to continue to work with him and other Members on finding an outcome and look forward to more deliberations especially with Ambassador Walker on this process. 8.139. The pandemic is far from over. The longer we go without a meaningful solution, the more we allow those challenges to mount and give rise to new ones. The global nature of this pandemic needs a global response where we exhaust all available avenues and means to overcome the present situation. We no te and appreciate the efforts of the D irector -General, especially for the WTO -WHO High Level Dialogue held recently. Pakistan has maintained that we are open to all solutions that contribute in a meaningful way, especially for the scaling up of production of vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics , and to provide their equitable and affordable access to everyone across the globe. In this regard, Pakistan is one of the co -sponsors of the TRIPS waiver proposal which must form an integral part of any response o f this organization to the pandemic. 8.140. We thank the cosponsors of the papers in documents WT/GC/823, 231 and 822 presented for the three sub -items in this agenda. This effort reveals a collective realization by the membership of a pressing need for the WTO to remain relevant in wake of this pandemic and provide a global response to a problem that affects us all. At the same time, Chair, we are starkly aware that for any response to be meaningful, it must add real value and contribute in a way that can actual ly address the core problems at hand. While we appreciate the efforts of the proponents, we note that the papers make general calls which serve the objectives of trade liberalization, policy and regulatory restriction, and transparency. These elements are already covered in several places in WTO agreements and principles in various forms. For instance, an early implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement is a general demand which is not even being resisted by any Member, but for the lack of direly ne eded technical assistance. Indeed, many members including developing countries , are already quite advanced in their implementation of the TFA. Similarly, principles for the use of export restrictions, tariff reduction, transparency and notifications are we ll established in the WTO Agreements, and a recall or reiteration of such principles does little to help the pandemic situation. In fact, new obligations for reporting, transparency, monitoring and review could add to the burdens for developing countries a lready constrained with poor capacities and infrastructure and dealing with the realities of the pandemic simultaneously. It is therefore difficult to fathom how these proposals are actually meant to combat the pandemic. 8.141. We note that the submission by the European Union, in item 8 (b), while detailing similar issues addressed above, discusses the element of compulsory licensing under the TRIPS Agreement as a means to expanding production , which has also been presented by them in the TRIPS Council. We would like to refer the membership to WTO documents IP/C/W/670, 672, 673 and 674 where the cosponsors of the TRIPS waiver proposal have, in meticulous detail, explained, among others, the problems with the implementation of existing flexibilities in the compulso ry licensing system. We appreciate the contributions to the production of vaccines and their export, including to and through the Covax facility. However, it is precisely the limitations of these and the present production facilities that present a serious challenge. A mere clarification of existing provisions on compulsory licensing is not something that would solve the problems and suddenly increase manufacturing. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 73 - 8.142. We also recognize the E uropean Union and other Members ' concerns about technology transfer, and their emphasis on voluntary licensing. This is also an element in the paper presented by Chinese Taipei in document 822 under Item 8 (c). We have, in many of our submissions in the General Council, TRIPS Council and other relevant bodies, requested Members to identify means by which they can provide certainty that the holders of technology will share it with developing countries, by means of a mere encouragement in a WTO document. Similarly, we have shown in many of our submissions , alongside the cospon sors of the TRIPS waiver proposal, how voluntary licensing remains confined in the hands of a few who wish to reap exorbitant monopolistic profits and the licenses they give out are selective, secretive and inadequate. We are not against the mechanisms of compulsory or voluntary licensing. We have consistently indicated our readiness and openness to all solutions that will help address the pandemic However, we are at a loss to understand how a mere reiteration or clarific ation of these existing provisions in a WTO document would concretely address the actual problems of the pandemic. How will these proposals overcome the disaster we referred to earlier today – that while advanced countries have already achieved vaccination for almost 50% of their population, they have still pre -purchased 90% of the 11 billion doses that are to be manufactured by the end of this year? Lastly, as indicated in our interventions today and before, we are happy to discuss and work with delegation s on proposals that meaningfully and concretely address the core problems. We must reiterate that the TRIPS waiver must form an integral component of any meaningful response of the WTO to the pandemic and we urge the membership to work seriously towards th at end. 8.143. The representative of Fiji provided the following statement: 8.144. On items 7 and 8 , the WTO must respond efficiently and effectively to the pandemic to mitigate the current circumstance and to device appropriate and sustainable future measures to help revive trade. This includes access to trade finance to support MSMEs and our service sector in small island developing states like Fiji and the Pacific Islands who remains disproportionately affected and are worsened off by this pandemic. 8.145. On Item 8, we thank the co -sponsors for the proposals which Fiji believes provide a framework on the WTO's response to the pandemic. The proposal needs to be reviewed wholistically in light of other proposals to address the equitable access to COVID vaccines, therapeutics and other COVID -19-related tools. We need to take a balance d approach that accounts for th e different dimensions , with the view of ensuring an efficient response to halt the pandemic and its evolving mutations , through equitable vaccine access. We need to build back our economies better and stronger , so we need the tools to be within our grasp as a starting point. 8.146. On document WT/GC/W/822 from Chinese Taipei , Fiji thanks the proponent for the ideas enshrined in the proposal and the efforts in formulating this draft ministerial declaration under the three -core framework of combating, mitigating and recovering from the pandemic and beyond. We hope to further engage to better understand the proposal , especially to revive small island developing states as Fiji, to allow them to sustainably build back better and to contribute to the global value chain in good time. 8.147. Fiji thanks the Secretariat and the important insights in the Information Note on the indicative list of items shared by the Secretariat on 20 July which accounts for all related discussions/seminars under the subject in the WTO. Finally, Fiji aligns itself with the ACP statement and the Pacific statement under these two items. 8.148. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 8.149. Under item 8.1 , Nigeria believes that the multilateral trading system should be responsiv e to the challenges raised by the pandemic. In our view targeted trade policies and international trade rules could support COVID containment efforts, build resilient health sectors and contribute to economic recovery. We share the proponents view that exp ort restrictions placed on diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines needed to combat COVID -19 by some developed countries undermined access to these products by developing countries. However, in our view, the major challenge undermining access to vaccines i s the huge and ever -increasing supply -demand gap and the solution has to do with our ability to ramp up production of these products. We believe that tariffs are not a barrier to trade in essential medical goods in times of a pandemic , as countries unilate rally dismantle tariffs to safeguard the lives of their citizens. For instance, Nigeria implemented a unilateral temporal WT/GC/M/19 2 - 74 - suspension of tariff s on essential medical products needed to combat COVID -19, and streamlined customs procedures related to the importation of these products. What is needed to ramp up production of COVID -19 vaccines is a waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the prevention, containment, and treatment of COVID -19. We therefore call on Members to support the India and South Africa led Proposal for a Waiver from Certain Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID -19, contained in document IP/C/W/669/R ev.1. The adoption of this waiver will also facilitate the building of a pandemic -resilient health sector in developing countries. 8.150. Under item 8.2 , Nigeria believes the major challenge undermining access to vaccines is the huge and ever -increasing supply - demand gap , and th e solution ha s to do with our ability to ramp up the production of these products. Existing flexibilities of the TRIPS Agreement , especially Article 31 and 31bis , are not sufficient given that they are not designed to address the challenge of global health emergencies such as that posed by the COVID -19 pandemic. It is for this reason that we believe the EU proposal cannot effectively address the current precarious situation which is exacerbated by the huge and ever -increasing therapeutics and vaccines suppl y - demand gap. The solution lies in rapid access by every country to affordable diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines to combat this COVID menace. This can only be achieved by ramping up the production of these products in developing countries. We there fore call on Members to support the proposal in document IP/C/W/669/R ev.1. The adoption of this waiver will also facilitate the building of a pandemic -resilient health sector in developing countries. 8.151. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 8.152. My delegation aligns with the statement delivered under this item by Chad on behalf of the LDCs. Bangladesh thanks the E uropean Union, Canada and other co -sponsors for the updates on the three communications under this agenda item. The communications highlight the urgency to help each other during a global crisis. LDCs particularly suffer the most in the face of any disaster – global, regional or local. The ongoing pandemic has multiplied their sufferings. The most urge nt issue is to stop the virus by ensuring easy and affordable access to vaccines and essential medical and pharmaceuticals products for everyone everywhere in the world. Bangladesh thanks the proponents for recognizing this human urgency, both for the pres ent and future, beyond the existing pandemic. Bangladesh however hopes that such proposals will not be tied up with any conditionality in future. Moreover, Members need more clarity on several expressions contained in the document (WT/GC/W/823) like emerg ing best practices, new WTO commitments, the period of validity for export restriction s and so on – just to name a few. 8.153. The Chair made reference to the statements made by delegations, noting, as he had, that issues related to the recovery from the health c risis were of the utmost importance, in particular as they looked ahead at MC12. These were helpful communications and initiatives that could feed into the work facilitated by Ambassador Walker. In fact, textual inputs from delegations form ed the backbone of sound process es. Members had heard the Facilitator's report and the Chair hoped he could count on all Members to work together and engage constructively in that process so that the WTO could provide an effective and credible multilateral r esponse to the pandemic. 8.154. The General Council took note of Chair's report under item 7, of the report of the Facilitator, and of the statements made under both items 7 and 8. 9 SAUDI ARABIA'S RESTRICTIVE POLICIES ON POULTRY IMPORTS – REQUEST FROM BRAZIL 9.1. The Chair recalled that t his item was on the agenda at the request of the delegation of Brazil . 9.2. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 9.3. Brazil has requested the inclusion of this item on the agenda of the General Council to b ring to the attention of the membership the series of restrictive measures Saudi Arabia has been adopting on poultry imports. These measures led to a drastic reduction of Brazilian exports to Saudi Arabia, which decreased by over 40% from 2015 to 2020, in terms of volume, and almost 50% in terms of value. At the same time, Saudi Arabia decided, in 2016, to include a 60% self-sufficiency goal in poultry production in its National Transformation Program. After achieving this, Saudi Arabia has WT/GC/M/19 2 - 75 - increased the self -sufficiency goal to 80% by 2025. Several different types of measures are being used, including , among others: suspension followed by suppression of the pre -listing system for the approval of plants; de-listing of plants without scientific justification or indication of the results of inspections and assessments; breach of the "de minimis" product -specific domestic support for poultry meat, since 2012; four-fold tariff increase; introduction of a non -automatic import licensing system, requiring unreasonably detailed information, including the disclosure of confidential business information; an intended reduction of the shelf life of fr ozen chicken products from the current 12 month to only 3 months, without scientific justification. Brazil has raised a specific trade concern regarding the de -listing of approved plants in several meetings of the SPS Committee. We have also questioned Sau di Arabia in the Committee on Agriculture regarding its import licensing system. Brazil expects that Saudi Arabia will reconsider these measures, in the light of its WTO obligations. 9.4. The representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statement: 9.5. At the outset, I would like to emphasize that the Kingdom's national plan and program are consistent with the international commitments including the WTO Agreements. Thus, w e do not agree with what was stated by Brazil regarding our national transformation program and th eir argument regarding the goal of self -sufficiency. Self -sufficiency means the quality or condition of being self -sufficient and it does not mean in any way restrictive policy or measures. Now let me respond to the specific trade concerns raised by Brazil . The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia took note of the concern s expressed by Brazil and would like to indicate to all WTO Members that this issue is totally related to the SPS measures tak en regarding certain poultry meat establishments in Brazil by the relevant a uthorities in Saudi Arabia. Also, we would like to indicate that the Saudi authorities have already provided Brazil officially with the required procedures needed to remove these SPS measures that affect the import of poultry meat and other poultry meat fr om certain establishments in Brazil to the Kingdom. All measures taken by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are consistent with the provisions of the SPS Agreement and intended to ensure food safety and the protection of human health in light of article 2.1 of t he SPS Agreement. Therefore, we see no merits in bringing this issue to the General Council since it is not the right forum to discuss this very technical SPS measure . Instead of this , we encourage Brazil to continue its participation in the recent dialogu e to resolve this issue bilaterally with the aim of reach ing a satisfactory solution for both sides. 9.6. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 9.7. The United States has raised similar concerns with Saudi Arabia regarding its po licies negatively affecting imports of poultry. There has been no progress to resolve our concerns. We look forward to working with Saudi Arabia and other Members to address these concerns. 9.8. The General Council took note of the statements. 10 TRADE RELATED CHALLENGES OF THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AND WAY FORWARD: A DRAFT FOR MC DECISION (WT/GC/W/807) 10.1. The Chair recalled that t his item had been included in the agenda at the request of Chad on behalf of the LDC Group and was related to the Communication from the LDC Group on "Trade Related Challenges of the Least Developed Countries and Way Forward" in document WT/GC/W/807 , which include d a propos ed Draft Ministerial Conference Decision. 10.2. The Chair further recalled that th e item ha d been discussed in the December 2020, March and May 2021 General Council meetings , where the LDC Group had requested assistance from the Chairman of the General Council in facilitating a conversation on this matter. 10.3. In response to that request, he had held a preliminary round of informal consultations with 21 delegations after the March meeting. As he had reported on the consultations in May, he only reiterate d some of the points he had made then: (i) delegations had sympathize d to the challenges faced by LDCs; (ii) several of them had raised some questions related to: (a) the rationale of the proposal, (b) th e 12-year period of extension, (c) the horizontal approach in seeking a solution in particular in light of the different challenges LDCs faced and the varying impacts of graduation on the LDCs, and (d) the issue of graduated LDCs benefiting more in particu lar vis-à-vis Members at similar levels of development who had never enjoyed LDC preferences. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 76 - 10.4. Since then, the Chair said he had had a constructive follow -up meeting with Chad, the LDC Coordinator, and Bangladesh, the Focal Point for LDC Graduation. The pur pose of that meeting had been two-fold: first, to take stock of the efforts and outreach undertaken by the LDC Group in responding to Members' questions on the proposal, and second, to understand how the LDC Group intended to carry that proposal forward in concrete terms. 10.5. From his discussion, he understood that the LDC Group had seen the General Council as the forum for a horizontal discussion on LDC Graduation, including with a view to work towards an outcome by MC12, or a clear pathway forward. 10.6. He had encouraged the LDCs to continue their outreach and respond to the questions raised by Members, and the meeting offered another opportunity to hear updates on their efforts. He also reminded the LDC Group that his door remain ed open should further assistance be needed. 10.7. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 10.8. The LDC Group submitted a draft Ministerial Decision back in December 2020 . It proposes that all of the measures to suppor t LDCs in the WTO be extended to LDCs who have graduated for 12 years after the date of the graduation. LDC graduation from one day to the next won't change of course the situation in the LDC and the pandemic has only worsened our existing challenges and shown how fragile LDC economies are. During the last triannual review of the CPD at the United Nations, Cambodia, Cameroon, Djibouti , Senegal and Zambia for the first time met the graduation criteria. Including them there are 16 countries which now satisfy graduation criteria and are on the road to graduation. Beyond those there are ten more countries that meet at least one of the graduation criteria and should be eligible for graduation during the next review in 2020. So, graduation has received a new boost and at this point LDCs need particular attention from Members on the evolution of that future status. 10.9. We are committed and working hard with Members on this matter , we appreciate the wide support that we received on our submission, Members are sensitive to the challenges that LDCs face and to LDCs on the road to graduation. LDCs are not asking for anything new, just a formal and predictable mechanism to extend existing flexibilities for a few extra years after graduation. And as such, soften the transitio n for LDCs that are on that road to graduation, complying with the relevant resolutions from the United Nations. 10.10. A number of Members have raised concerns about the logic of the proposal, the 12 -year duration that has been proposed, the horizontal approach , the differentiation between LD Cs on the road to graduation and non -LDC developing countries, based on a series of indicators and of course the possibility of LDCs to ask the United Nations to slow down the graduation process. We responded to all the questions that have been asked and we do not want to repeat our answers now, they are available in the minutes of formal meetings. However, our group would be more than happy to explain anything or to provide any supplementary explanation to any Member that would like them , and that would be in the next bilateral opportunity. 10.11. I would also like to call Members' attention to the fact that the duly motivated request from the LDC Group in IP/C/W/668 from the TRIPS Council hasn't even been partially dealt with. Members agree that the challenges li nked to the TRIPS Agreement for LDCs after graduation would remain an integral part of the duly motivated request and therefore will be followed up in the General Council within the framework of this submission. So, it could be the case of this be further reviewed. We would like to see a result between now and MC12 . We thank you Chairman for your continued discussions on this issue, and also would like to reaffirm our commitment with Members to find a landing -ground with them on how we will deal with this i ssue at MC12. I think a really focused remit on all of the flexibilities linked to LDC graduation would be very useful for us and we will continue to discuss with Members and continue to request their support to the legitimate LDC cause. 10.12. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 10.13. Bangladesh aligns with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDCs on this issue. To recap what our coordinator just said, the LDC Group submitted this draft at the G eneral Council meeting in Decem ber 2020 and since then, the G eneral Council has been discussing this item. The draft decision proposes that all support measures available to LDCs in the WTO shall be extended to WT/GC/M/19 2 - 77 - graduated LDCs for a period of twelve years after the effective date of grad uation from the LDC category , as decided by the UN General Assembly. 10.14. The LDC Group has been approaching and engaging with Members and groups seeking their understanding and support on this issue. We are grateful to WTO Members for their general support in favour of this submission. Even those Members who did not support are sympathe tic to the challenges of the LDCs who are on the graduation track. As the coordinator just said, LDCs are not asking for anything new, but simply a continuation of the existing flexibilities for a few more years after graduation to help them navigate throu gh the transition. We are truly grateful to you, Chair, for your continued engagement and consultations with Members and different groups on this issue. 10.15. I must emphasise that graduation of an LDC based on three development thresholds does not fully take c are of all development challenges of the country. It needs time to adjust with and adapt to the sudden loss of the ISMs, particularly the trade related exemptions and flexibilities. My colleague LDC Coordinator has responded to some queries, particularly o n the rational e of the proposal, duration, horizontal approach, differentiation, etc. So, I do not want to repeat the same. Our group will be happy to explain further any issue, if needed, to interested delegations both formally and informally. In our unde rstanding, the issue may be a possible deliverable of MC12. We wish to continue our engagement with Members to find a common approach to address this issue during MC12. 10.16. The representative of Nepal provided the following statement: 10.17. My delegation wishes to align with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group, and would like to submit the following additional points. I wish to refer to the statement s delivered by my delegation since last December and reiterate all the justifications and argu ments shared earlier. Sustainable and inclusive export constitutes a critical pillar for the overall socio-economic development of a country. This remains instrumental in achieving a sustainable LDC graduation and SDGs by 2030. Despite the devastating impa cts of the COVID -19 pandemic, LDCs are not hesitating to proceed in the path to the graduation. However, supply side capacity constraints and the negative impact of the pandemic have posed severe challenges to their sustainable graduation. Sustainable graduation requires a continuation of LDC -specific support for a certain time period after graduation. This is well -reflected in the submission of the LDC group. The post - graduation temporary support will not have significant negative impact on international trade as the LDCs cover just about 1% of global merchandise trade ; and it will end after 12 years of their graduation as per the submission, which aims to support sustainable graduation rather than do harm in international trade. 10.18. An incomplete and fragile graduation, without a specific support mechanism, may lead graduated LDCs to confront much more difficulties in addition to their existing constra ints. For these reasons, graduating LDCs are in dire need of continuation of the existing LDC -specific support measures for 12 years , as is reflected in the submission. This is not any new or additional support graduating LDCs are seeking for but just a continuation of the flexibilities already given to LDCs for a few more years , merely for their smooth transition to graduation. It is an important aspect of global cooperation and collaboration and is, therefore, incumbent upon the international community to support this vulnerable group of economies. 10.19. The representative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 10.20. I would like to align myself to the statement of LDC Group. It should be recalled that the LDC category was established by the United Nations Ge neral Assembly in 1971 as countries with special economic needs that needed special treatment. Since then, LDCs have been granted numerous special treatments including the preferential market access under Generalised System of Preference, preferential rule s of origin, preferential services and many others in the WTO multilateral trading system. The objectives of the special treatments are to reduce the vulnerabilities of LDCs from externalities, increasing productive capacities , and to link products from LD Cs to the markets in an effort to integrat e them into the world trading system. As mentioned in the previous meetings of the General Council, the granted preferential treatments immensely support the growth of LDCs . As a result, some are scheduled for grad uation in the coming few years. Much as the graduation from LDCs is a milestone achievement, it should be handled carefully by providing a reasonable transition period to avoid affecting the attained progress. The contribution of the WTO to the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 78 - economic achievements of LDCs is tremendous, it has played a great role of heavy lifting of LDCs towards graduation. With that in mind, it will be important for Members to endorse the proposed decision that will help graduating LDCs not to backslid e. 10.21. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 10.22. We have appreciated the LDCs ' outreach and look forward to continuing our discussion with them as we work to understand several aspects of this proposal and its potential implications. W e believe the proposal raises several interesting and challenging questions that continue to need reflection. One is about horizontal equity, or in this case, potentially significant inequity. That is, under this proposal, any graduating LDC would continue to receive special treatment and preferences that are available only to LDCs for 12 years past graduation. However, a non -LDC Member that scores lower on various development indicators than the graduating LDC would not receive such special treatment. This raises a question of fairness. It is not a theoretical question. From our colleagues at the UN, we understand that Bangladesh and Lao PDR could graduate as soon as 2026. Both Bangladesh and Lao PDR, as of 2019, already had a GNI per capita (measured on a PPP basis) that was significantly higher than that of non -LDC Members, including Nigeria, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Kenya, Tajikistan, Cameroon, Congo and Zimbabwe. 10.23. The proposal also raises questions about the relationship between WTO rules and developme nt. Some of the LDC -specific S pecial and Differential provisions that would be extended for 12 years past graduation would, in effect, delay these Members ' implementation of WTO rules. This would appear to suggest that such WTO rules are somehow in conflic t with development. We continue to believe that implementation of WTO rules fosters development, and that graduating LDCs would not want to delay their implementation. In addition, the proposal also raises questions about need, given the lengthy and very f lexible UN graduation process. As an example, the UN once recommended that a certain LDC graduate "immediately ", but graduation didn 't occur for another 23 years. The UN graduation process is intended to ensure that by the time a LDC graduates, it would be extremely difficult for the country to meet the LDC criteria ever again. We look forward to continued engagement with the proponents on this. 10.24. The representative of China provided the following statement: 10.25. LDCs comprise around 12 % of the world 's population, while they only account for less than 2% of world GDP and around 1% of global trade. Due to their vulnerability to external factors, LDCs are facing significant challenges, aggravated by the prolonged C OVID -19 pandemic. As a staunch supporter for LDCs ' better integration into the multilateral trading system, China extends 97% duty free treatment for imports from 41 LDCs and 95% duty free treatment for imports from another 2 LDCs. Transition periods are also provided for some recently graduated LDCs. China sees the importance and necessity for the substantial discussion on the draft decision, particularly in the context of the pandemic. We call for Members ' collective and constructive engagement in the proposal and look forward to a meaningful an d positive outcome at MC12. 10.26. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 10.27. During the Doha Round, we agreed to put the needs and interest of developing countries, and especially the least developed among us , at the heart of our development agenda. However, since the creation of the WTO in 1994, only 6 countries have graduated from LDC to developing country status. We all acknowledge that transition from LDC to developing status presents num erous challenges and require s significant amendments to a Member 's trade regime, especially with regards to institutional capacity and WTO obligations, including under the TRIPS Agreement. The loss of LDC - specific preferences also becomes a concern as it m ay have important impacts on market access on these vulnerable economies. Considering potential difficulties faced by graduating LDCs and the impact of the COVID -19 pandemic on LDC economies, the African Group fully supports the submission by the LDC Group contained in document WT/GC/W/807 as well as the draft Ministerial decision. 10.28. We believe that the 12 years transition would allow LDCs to continue with the LDC -specific support measures , and that special and differential treatments and flexibilities are reasonable. Graduating LDCs deserve to be supported and the draft Ministerial decision provides for a WT/GC/M/19 2 - 79 - comprehensive and effective smooth transition within the WTO system. The African Group therefore calls upon all Members to constructively engage in discuss ions on the proposal with a view to its adoption at MC12. Let me also seize this opportunity to express our appreciation for the agreement reached at the last TRIPS Council for the extension of the transition period for the application of the TRIPS obligat ions to LDCs. 10.29. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 10.30. We refer to the statements we delivered at previous G eneral Council meetings and at the last G eneral Council meeting in May 2021. We associate ourselves with the statement made by the Africa Group. An overarching objective of the Istanbul Programme of Action for the LDCs for the Decade 2011 –2020 (IPoA) is the graduation and smooth transition of LDCs. Graduation from the United Nations (UN) LDC category is seen as an important milestone in the development path of each LDC. Whilst the graduation of LDCs should be welcomed and it is a sign of positive progress, the phasing -out of benefits associated with the LDC sta tus could present challenges for graduating LDC governments on their path towards integration into the global economy. It is important to explore what additional supportive measures can be agreed upon to ensure a sustainable graduation. LDCs face significa nt trade and development challenges, more so in the context of the COVID -19 pandemic which threatens to reverse some of the gains achieved over the years towards the SDGs. South Africa reiterate s its support for the LDCs ' submission in WT/GC/ W/807 and look s forward to constructive discussions towards a decision at MC12. 10.31. The representative of India provided the following statement: 10.32. At the outset we welcome the decision made by Members at the TRIPS Council last month on the extension of the transition period under Article 66.1 of the TRIPS Agreement and I thank and congratulate all Members for their tireless efforts, in this regard. India has been a votary of LDC 's integration into the multilateral trading system, and has been at the forefront of efforts to increase their share in global trade . To that end , India has unequivocally supported the request by the LDC group contained in document WT/GC/W/807 for the duration as decided by Members by consensus. India urges Members to engage constructively and consider this proposal favourably for an outcome at MC12. 10.33. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 10.34. We would like to thank Chad for presenting the proposal on behalf of the LDCs. We wish to register our support for the proposal. We also want to call Members to consider the vulnerability of the LDCs and to grant their support for the proposal. 10.35. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 10.36. I wish to thank those Members who have taken the floor for their support. We have also taken good note of the questions and concerns raised by the United States. We stand ready to continue ongoing discussions in all potential configurations. We look forward to providing additional clarification and respo nses to the concerns that have been raised or that may be raised by Members. We stand ready, open and flexible with an aim to forging a compromise on our proposal while adopting a realistic and pragmatic approach. Chairman, pragmatism, realism these are th e words that underpin the work of the LDC Group. We are certain that all WTO Members will understand the colossal challenges that LDCs face, including graduating LDCs. Indeed, addressing the concerns of the most vulnerable countries means standing in solidarity with the most vulnerable, poorest populations, and there are specific challenges in doing so. We would like to again thank Members for their support for this proposal. 10.37. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 10.38. The European Union is mindful of the challenges that least developed countries face in integrating in the global trading system. The European Union also recogni zes that while graduation is a positive and remarkable milestone to be celebrated, many graduated least developed countries have not, at the time of their graduation, achieved the same level of capacity and integration in the global economy of those developing countries that are better integrated in the global trading system. A smooth transition after graduation may therefore be needed in some cases. The European Union WT/GC/M/19 2 - 80 - does believe that there should be support and flexibilities for WTO Members, commensurate with their needs and capacity constraints, beyond the group of Least Developed Countries. As not ed previously, this is established in the European Union' s trade and cooperation policies that provide support for least developed countries, for countries that have recently graduated from the least developed countries ' status, as well as other developing countries. 10.39. In the area of trade specifically, the aim of the European Union is to focus on how to facilitate and enhance the capacity of countries to assume commitments that foster integration in the global economy. In our view that is the best way that the WTO can effectively contribute to sustainable development. In that spirit, the European Union will continue to support constructive initiatives to better integrate Members with capacity constraints into the multilate ral trading system, and to take into account in that connection the specific situation of graduating least developed countries. We especially encourage discussions based on analysis that shows where specific difficulties exist. We look forward to hearing t he views of other Members and we thank in particular the LDC G roup for their continued constructive engagement in this matter. 10.40. The representative of Niger provided the following statement: 10.41. The impact of the COVID -19 pandemic crisis is much more accentuated for LDCs , not only in health but also in economic terms. This situation adds to the vulnerability faced by the Members of our group. The international community will have to play its part and assist the LDCs in their efforts with ade quate financial resources, policy space and more effective international support measures in areas where our capacities are limited, notably in the area of technology transfer. The rapid spread of the pandemic has shown that the call for a true global part nership to ensure that no one is left behind is not just a moral commitment, but also a longer -term consideration for the resilience of the global system. Therefore, we believe that the draft Ministerial Decision for LDCs to benefit from a transition perio d of at least 12 years after graduation , must receive a favourable opinion from all Members , to allow for a smooth transition after graduation. All the factual data and other analyses made by other international organi zations, such as the recent publicatio ns of UNCTAD, highlight the urgent need to support LDCs after their graduation from this category, particularly because of the extreme vulnerability of these countries and the disastrous consequences that any natural or cyclical, structural or specific eco nomic, health or security shocks may have on these countries, and whose degree may cause them to fall back into the category of LDCs. 10.42. The representative of Uganda provided the following statement: 10.43. My delegation associates itself with the statement deliver ed by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group and the views of other LDC Members on this matter. We recall our statement delivered at the last General Council Meeting of 5 -6 May 2021 and request that it is fully reflected in the minutes of this meeting.16 10.44. The Chair noted that this had been the fourth time that the matter had been discussed at the General Council. He added that he had heard the LDCs say that this was an important issue for them – something that they would want to resolve in the lead up to MC12. He had further likewise heard other delegations reiterate the points they had previously made on th e proposal. There seem ed to be a need for greater clarity on the main problem the LDCs wish ed to address and on the response they propose d. The Chair urged the LDCs and all Members to listen to each other and work together to find a mutually agreeable solution ; and remain ed available to assist in th at endeavour . 10.45. The General Council took note of the statements. 16 The statement delivered by Uganda at the General Council Meeting held on 5-6 May 2021 is contained in document WT/GC/M/191, para. 5.29 and included by reference in the minutes of this meeting. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 81 - 11 PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR WTO COUNCILS AND COMMITTEES ADDRESSING TRADE CONCERNS – COMMUNICATION FROM ALBANIA; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHINA; EUROPEAN UNION; HONG KONG, CHINA; ICELAND; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH MACEDONIA; NORWAY; PANAMA; QATAR; SINGAPORE; SWITZERLAND; THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU; THAILAND; TURKEY; AND UKRAINE (WT/GC/W/777/REV.6) 11.1. The Chair recalled that the item had been added at the request of t he European Union, together with the revised communication in WT/GC/W/777/Rev.6. 11.2. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 11.3. On behalf of all co -sponsors, the European Union would like to provide an update about our work on the proposal for Procedural Guidelines for WTO Councils a nd Committees Addressing Trade Concerns. To recall, this proposal aims to improve how WTO Members address each other 's trade concerns in regular WTO bodies. For more than a year, co -sponsors of the proposal have continued to listen to concerns and suggestions. We would like to thank Members for the feedback we received. This revision comes as a response to that. It is an honest and serious attempt at capturing a possible common ground. We sense support for the ideas in the first part of the proposal on meeting arrangements - this part remains. 11.4. We also heard some concerns around the part dedicated to the informal resolution of trade concerns. Although co -sponsors are convinced that these elements could have helped, we have taken them out. The emphasis is now more on Member -to-Member consultations, where Members can, if they deem appropriate, associate with the WTO Secretariat or technical experts to benefit from their technical input. 11.5. A number of changes have also been introduced as regards the consid eration of trade concerns in WTO bodies. For instance, Members are encouraged to engage in writing , but a longer timeframe is suggested for Members to provide a written response (60 days now instead of 30 days). This was a rapid and non -exhaustive brush of the amendments but gives a sense of the flexibilities included. 11.6. The overall approach of the proposal remains unchanged, namely that of non -binding guidelines with the objective to give guidance to Members to use tools at their disposal, while the responsi bility remains , of course , on Members to address and do their best to resolve trade concerns. We hope that we can move forward on the basis of this revised text and look forward to stepping up engagement with other Members. 11.7. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 11.8. The LDC Group takes note of the co -author's update to the proposal on procedural guidelines addressing trade concerns. The LDC Group is carefully reviewing this proposal and may have further comment s. Our initial observation is that we should bear in mind the limitations LDCs face , especially given the small sizes of our delegations. We understand that the proposal on meeting arrangements in paragraph 1 , which stipulates that documents should be subm itted 15 days before a meeting , aims to pave the way for debates on specific trade concerns. It might be helpful to have additional time to consider these concerns before the meeting. Indeed, the 15 -day timeline might be more challenging for LDCs with trade concerns, it might not provide them enough time to have documents ready 15 days before the meeting, so we would like to ask the cosponsors if they can clarify whether these guidelines are voluntary . 11.9. For the LDC Group, any proposed new procedural guidelines and processes need to bear in mind the limitations that our group faces, that our Members face. We need to avoid overburdening the system , which might prevent all of our Members from being able t o fully participate or contribute. We have taken note of paragraph 12 and also the fact that regular WTO bodies have put in place mechanisms to respond to specific trade concerns. We are currently analysing the proposal paragraph -by-paragraph and bearing i n mind the experience of our delegations. Of course, our aim is to further contribute to this discussion before the 12th Ministerial Conference. 11.10. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 82 - 11.11. We wish to refer to our statement on this issu e delivered at the G eneral Council meeting of 22 July 2020 and reiterate that the proposal is burdensome on developing countries. To achieve the desired improvement, there is need for clarification on the challenges undermining the effectiveness of the ver tical procedures currently available in the regular committees and councils, which necessitated a horizontal procedure. There is also need for clarifications on the scope of the concerns that can be raised under these procedural guidelines , to guide agains t Members raising issues that are outside the scope of existing agreements. Given the resource and capacity constraint of developing countries, care must be taken to ensure that proposals like this do not directly or inadvertently place huge burden s on developing countries that are still grappling with the implementation of existing obligations. In view of the foregoing, we stand ready to further engage proponents of this proposal to explore further flexibilities for developing countries , especially LDCs, who will most likely encounter difficulties in complying with the guidelines contained in this proposal. 11.12. The Director -General provided the following statement: 11.13. I wanted to thank everybody. I thought that what the Ambassador of Kazakhstan has said has a lot of merit , and we really ought to think about it17. What has also struck me is the way that Members say that they have been hearing the same thing for years, for time they have been here, and I thought we should reflect on that. There is really something to think about - how do we move forward at the WTO. I wanted to share this reflection, and I think we ought to consider this proposal for limiting the time for interventions . 11.14. The representative of South Africa provided the following statem ent: 11.15. We wish to recall our previous statements in this submission, including at the last G eneral Council in May 2021. We remain concerned with the horizontal application of this proposal. Addressing specific trade concerns (STCs) is provided for under cer tain agreements. Mainstreaming of STCs across all committees and councils will negatively impact developing countries who already have capacity constraints. We already have the instruments needed to address trade concerns within respective agreements. This proposal is enlarging the mandates of regular bodies in ways we have concerns with. We do nevertheless find the suggestions under the section "meeting arrangements " – on the documents for meetings, minutes of meetings , etc., helpful. Concerns raised by LD Cs on the 15 days have merit and would require further consideration. 11.16. The representative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 11.17. As one of the co -sponsors of this proposal, it is encouraging to see Members actively providing suggestions which make the proposal more neutral and practicable. It can be reasonably expected that these non -binding guidelines on meeting arrangement s, informal consultations, and consideration of trade concerns in WTO bodies, among other things, will b e able to substantially improve the process of addressing specific trade concerns without much additional burden to Members, so that Members can deal with their daily works and resolve long -standing issues more effectively. In addition, it will be a concre te step to improve the WTO's monitoring and deliberative function in support of the future reform of the WTO. We look forward to having more Members discuss with the proponents and ultimately join the proposal. 11.18. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 11.19. Addressing trade concerns in WTO Councils and Committees is an essential part of overseeing the implementation of WTO Agreements. Korea appreciates the intervention the European Union and, as a co -sponsor of this proposal, supports the establishment of non -binding procedural guidelines along the line of this proposal. In the view of my delegation, the revised proposal, which has reflected some concerns expressed by Members, will help enable the WTO mechanism to operate in a more efficient and systematic way so as to facilitate the effective resolution of trade concerns among Members through dialogue. Korea urges all Members to engage in constructive discussion on this proposal to finetune the details of the procedures and bu ild consensus. 17 See statement by Kazakhstan un der Item 8, para 8.131. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 83 - 11.20. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement: 11.21. Uruguay thanks the co -sponsors for submitting the sixth revision of this proposal, as well as the explanations provided by the European Union on the changes made to it. Uruguay maintains its doubts previously expressed on the proposal to adopt a "top down" horizontal approach, instead of allowing each body to review or adapt its operating rules, where necessary, in light of its particular situation. With regard to paragra ph 11, Uruguay understands that Members should be free to use existing mechanisms in councils and committees to raise their concerns and express their positions in a manner that they understand to be relevant. In other words, it is up to Members to decide how to make better use of time and how to exercise their rights at the WTO. We remain ready to engage in open and constructive discussions with interested Members with a view to improving the functioning of the regular bodies of this organization and their outcomes, particularly as regards the effective resolution of the many trade concerns submitted to them. 11.22. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement: 11.23. With regard to document WT/GC/777/Rev.6, we reiterate that the horizontal nature of the document remains a problem for my delegation, particularly in the light of paragraph 5, which establishes that these procedures shall prevail over those specific to each Committee. The nature of some Committees, such as the TBT and SPS Commit tees, means that they operate differently to other regular Committees. In addition, these Committees are functioning extremely well, with the exception of some overlap s or scheduling problems , that have more to do with the functioning of the Council for Tr ade in Goods and the internal coordination of the Secretariat than with the work of these Committees per se. While the proponents have given assurances on a number of occasions that these guidelines would not apply to the above -mentioned Committees, this i s not indicated in the proposal. In addition, the prescriptive nature of paragraph 6 could inadvertently obstruct dialogue rather than encourage it, since the Member to which the concern relates could delay addressing the concern by claiming that the descr iption provided in advance is insufficient to prepare a substantive reply. We have already witnessed such behaviour at certain sessions of the Committees. 11.24. With regard to the submission of questions, we are of the view that the Member should send the repli es prior to the meeting, provided the questions were submitted before the closure of agenda, with a view to moving forward the discussions in the room. The 60 -day period granted after the meeting , essentially means that the replies are not addressed and th ere is no opportunity for follow -up questions or clarifications at the meeting, which delays even further the handling of the concern , instead of ensuring progress towards its resolution. Lastly, paragraph 11, in which "Members…are encouraged" to ensure th eir statements have a specific focus in order to "make the best use of time", is contrary to Paraguay's position that Members will use their best understanding and judgement when deciding how to address the concerns of their interest, that repetition may b e necessary, and that sufficient time must be granted for the handling of trade concerns, in line with the level of priority that each Member attaches to the concern. The implicit suggestion that addressing trade concerns is not "mak[ing] the best use of t ime" in the Committees , is unacceptable to my delegation. 11.25. The representative of Chile provided the following statement: 11.26. Chile welcomes this new version of the document. We are pleased by some of the changes made, such as the elimination of the section "In formal resolution of trade concerns", as well as the limitation of the powers intended to be granted to the Secretariat and the Chairs of the bodies. However, the idea of establishing horizontal guidelines to address specific trade concerns in the councils and committees still features, with these "guidelines" prevailing over the functioning of each body. In addition, despite the changes introduced, we remain of the view that this proposal would restrict Members' ability to raise trade concerns, as i ndicated by Paraguay. Lastly, we consider that many of the elements contained in the proposal do not require a decision by the General Council, but instead may be implemented within the relevant Committee, at the initiative of its Chair, the Secretariat or the Members themselves. 11.27. The representative of India provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 84 - 11.28. India supports the idea of improving the meeting arrangements of WTO bodies with a view to make them more efficient. We, therefore, support proposals for preparation of advance indicative yearly schedule of meetings , circulation of all documents to be discussed at a meeting at least 15 days prior to the meeting and timely circulation of the minutes of meetings of various WTO bodies. We also agree that it is in the intere sts of all Members to make full use of the WTO Council s and Committees to seek satisfactory outcomes of their trade concerns. However, while considering any changes in procedures to be followed for various WTO bodies, we need to ensure that such proposals, in effect, do not end up adding to or diminishing Members’ rights and obligations under the concerned WTO Agreements. India also believes that the appropriate forum for discussing procedural guidelines for trade concerns is the relevant Council or Committ ee dealing with the specific trade concern, as per the scope of the relevant WTO Agreement. Therefore, while we are open to discuss all possible suggestions aimed at improving existing processes, we would not like to take away the role of such WTO bodies i n finalizing such procedural guidelines. 11.29. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 11.30. Let me begin by aligning our statement with that of Chad made on behalf of the LDC Group. We welcome the constructive ideas in the proposal. My del egation previously made some suggestions, for example, for changes in the existing format of the convening notice and the necessity of uploading the meeting summary on the same day on the WTO website, to help smaller delegations who are unable to attend al l meetings update their information repository. My delegation also pointed out the concerns on the proposed provision in paragraph 10 of the draft regarding participation of capital -based experts through video conferencing. Internet connection is still a severe challenge in many of our countries. Nonetheless, we look forward to engaging constructively with all concerned Members on this issue to move forward the discussion. 11.31. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP , provided the following statement: 11.32. The ACP Group is of the view there are certain systemic benefits which apply to all WTO Members when they are allowed to address trade concerns through the relevant Councils and Committees of the organi zation. There are a lso benefits to be derived from strengthening the ability of regular WTO Committees and Councils to facilitate the effective consideration of trade concerns to the extent that it improves efficiency, is inexpensive and increases the robustness of the proce sses concerned. However, we have to be mindful that there is the potential to impose additional financial and institutional burdens on developing countries and LDC Members. Essentially, some elements of the proposal would require technical assistance, trai ning, a greater commitment of time and human resources in some cases. 11.33. We should also proceed cautiously in seeking to establish deadlines that are difficult for many delegations to meet. We must also give further consideration to whether it is best to est ablish horizontal procedural guidelines across various WTO Councils and Committees including in areas which differ substantially and which would require specific guidelines which are fit for purpose. The ACP Group believe s that the current proposal could b enefit from further consultations across the WTO Membership, and we stand ready to engage. Therefore, we are not in a position to support or endorse the proposal at this time. We trust that the proponents will accept our invitation to carry out further out reach to Members. 11.34. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 11.35. We are carefully reviewing the revised proposal, with an eye for practical and modest steps that would contribute to a shared goal – to rebuild norms for Members to respond to and address trade concerns raised by other Members. As we have noted previously, these norms have eroded, and the key culprit appears to be some Members ' lack of interest and political will to address such concerns. Fundamentally, the problem is substantive, not procedural. But we don 't rule out identifying pragmatic procedural steps that could help. WTO Committees are diverse, and solutions that can be applied horizontally may be few. But we look forward to working with the proponents to find potential solutions. In addition, we urge Members – those raising the concern and those that are the subject of the concern — and not the Secretariat or the Chair — to put the work and political will into finding substantive solutions to specific trade concerns. 11.36. The representative of Uganda provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 85 - 11.37. My delegation wishes to thank the proponents for their communication and their continued efforts towards ensuring that the concerns and interests of Members are reflected throu gh the revisions. We note that there is work still to be done in this regard. It is especially important for the proponents to fully recognize the constraints that delegations like mine face in terms of size. We look forward to a revision that fully takes into consideration this important issue. 11.38. The General Council took note of the statements. 12 SUPPORTING THE CONCLUSION OF FISHERIES SUBSIDIES NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE OCEAN AND FISHING COMMUNITIES – DRAFT MINISTERIAL DECISION – COMMUNICATION FROM BRAZIL (WT/GC/W/815) 12.1. The Chair recalled that the item had been included in the agend a for the second time by the delegation of Brazil, together with the communication in document WT/GC/W/815. 12.2. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 12.3. Each year, governments spend an estimated US D 22 billion on capacity -enhancing subsidies that artificially lower fishing costs. Consequently, the percentage of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels has dropped continuously, and now more than one -third of fish stocks in the oceans are overfished. This deteriorat ion has a serious impact on the livelihoods of millions of people who depend on fishing resources. This is precisely why we should keep a sense of urgency to finalize the negotiations. It is no small matter that the only multilateral negotiation s in the WT O today that could yield results in the short run has a sustainability purpose. WTO Members, therefore, have a crucial role to play in securing a robust agreement to curb subsidies that lead to overcapacity and overfishing and contribute to the depletion o f global maritime fish stocks, as well as to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. Brazil invites all Members to join this initiative and hopes that the proposed draft could be approved by the General Council before the MC 12. We look forward to working constructively with Members on this matter. 12.4. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 12.5. The United States is committed to working with Members to reach a meaningful conclusion to the negotiations. The current negotiating text can serve as the basis for a Member -led, text -based negotiation, but it does not yet contain the elements required for reaching a meaningful conclusion. The United States has proposed a targeted approach to ensure that highlighting and addressing the use of forced labo ur on fishing vessels are part of any outcome. This is an important way for the WTO to positively impact the lives of our fishers and workers. There are other key elements missing from the negotiating text, and we hope to have a text -based negotiation so these can be reflected in the text. Significant shortcomings must also be addressed if we are to successfully conclude these negotiations. This includes the approach with respect to special and differential treatment. A blanket approach to special and differential treatment with permanent carve -outs is neither appropriate nor effective given the purpose of this agreement. It also does not reflect the reality that some self - declared developing country Members are among the largest producers and subsidizers, or among the wealthiest Members of this organization. WTO Members have an opportunity to produce an agreement that can make a serious and credible contribution to ending harmful fisheries subsidies. This will require all Members to make an d support improvements to the text to reach a meaningful outcome. 12.6. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 12.7. The African Group has consistently emphasized that any outcome at MC12 should, inter alia, be based on the principles of sustainability. An agreement on fisheries subsidies that delivers on SDG 14.6 would be an excellent example for the WTO to prove that it is indeed committed to contribute to the sustainability agenda. We further reiterated t his position at the last Ministerial TNC Meeting. In addition, the Ministerial meeting has also provided clear guidance on how to move forward in the negotiations. Delegations also often recalled the MC11 mandate. Let me reiterate the commitment of the Afr ican Group to the conclusion of a balanced outcome on fisheries subsidies , and this is where our focus should be in the coming months. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 86 - 12.8. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 12.9. South Africa supports the interventions made on beh alf of the African Group and the ACP Group . We once again thank Brazil for their submission as entailed in WT/GC/W/815. We are guided by the Ministerial mandates, including of MC11, as well as SDG 14.6 in the Fisheries negotiations. We are concerned that t he proposed Draft Ministerial Decision, seems to re -interpret the mandate in ways we do not find helpful and makes no reference to special and differential treatment - a critical element of the mandate quoted above. In view of the sustainability objectives of the mandate, we believe that the principle of common but differentiated responsibility should underpin the negotiations. Given the substantial amount of work to be completed for our fisheries subsidies ' negotiations, we do not see how work on a draft decision will assist us in completing the outstanding work. Our Ministers at the 15 July 2021 Ministerial TNC meeting indicated that much more work needs to be done to address the imbalances in the current C hair's text. All our efforts should be directed to ensure that gaps in the text are addressed if we are to reach agreement before or at MC12. 12.10. The representative of India provided the following statement: 12.11. I While India remains fully committed to the negoti ations on fisheries subsidies as provided under the SDG 14.6 and the MC11 mandates, we share our concern regarding the lack of explicit reference to special and differential treatment for developing countries and LDCs, an integral and important part of SDG 14.6 and the mandate of MC11. In the previous G eneral Council Meeting, we had highlighted and sought clarification on some of the few phrases used in the communication such as "ambitious outcome ", "to curb subsidies that threaten global maritime fish stoc ks", "improve existing WTO disciplines in fisheries subsidies " and "highest standards of environmental sustainability ". But we did not receive any clarification on these terms used in the communication. Its disconcerting that in the name of collective resp onsibility the communication puts at par countries with no or very few industrial fishing fleets with countries having highly developed industrialised fishing fleets. We believe that environmental sustainability of fisheries resources, is a classic case for the application of the polluter pays principle and common and differentiated responsibility. 12.12. At the 15 July Ministerial TNC on fisheries subsidy negotiations , it was evident that Members agreed that status quo is not the preferred option , because irrational subsidies and overfishing by many countries is hurting the interest of our fishermen; but it was also evident that significant gaps still exist. I am sure d elegations would have noted that more than 80 delegations said they did not believe the draft consolidated text is balanced to call it a landing zone for them. We heard Minister after Minister calling the text imbalanced and requiring to be reworked to mak e it a negotiating text. On the issue of special and differential treatment , once again speakers representing more than 80 delegations said that what the text offers on special and differential treatment is grossly inadequate and they rejected the notion t hat special and differential treatment should be restricted to artisanal fishing , and that too within 12 nautical miles. They also demanded the text should provide sufficient policy space for developing their future fishing capacities for achieving equitab le growth. Ministers and Members emphasized that, if this agreement is about sustainability, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, the biggest subsidizers who are responsible for the present state of marine resources should take greater responsibility to reduce their subsidies and fishing capacities. 12.13. Let me finish by saying that while India remains committed to concluding these negotiations, unfortunately we are quite far from the necessary landing zone required to reach an agreement. We hope that after the summer break, sincere efforts will be made to accommodate the interests of developing countries and LDCs in the draft text, which at the moment remains highly imbalanced. 12.14. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 12.15. The LDCs are actively involved in text -based negotiations and fully expect that the Members will find a landing -zone in the areas that will enable us to achieve a positive outcome. As India underscored, special and differential treatment is a key element in the fisheries subsidies provisions, and we feel that LDCs would like to reiterate how important special and differential treatment is as a means of tackling specific concerns of artisanal fisheries , particularly in least developed countries. We really need room for manoeuvre to ensure that our fleets can be developed in a sustainable way. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 87 - The LDC Group will continue to exhibit flexibility under a constructive spirit with a view to achieving final agreement on fish eries subsidies. 12.16. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP, provided the following statement: 12.17. We re -affirm our full commitment to concluding the fisheries subsidies negotiations as soon as possible, preferably, before the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference. We would also wish to ensure that we conclude a quality agreement that delivers on the SDG14.6 and MC11 mandates. The WTO 's fundamental objectives of prohibiting certain forms of harmful subsidies that contribute to overfishing and overcapacity and IUU fishing, while preserving the sovereign rights of Members within their maritime jurisdiction, and allowing for sufficient policy space for developing countries and LDCs to develop the capacity of their fisheries sector , in a manne r that responsibly seize the benefits to be derived from the ocean economy. In 2018, only ten of the largest subsidizing fishing countries in the high Human -Development Index (HDI) category together accounted for 64 percent of the global total fisheries su bsidies. Total subsidies provided by all high HDI countries amounted to 87 percent, which represents a bulk share of the total. In contrast, estimations from the same global dataset reveal that 62 developing WTO Members, which form the African, Caribbean a nd Pacific (ACP) Group at the WTO, together account for only 4.7 percent of total global marine fisheries subsidies. ACP and African Group Members are predominantly not subsidising or engaged in large - scale industrial fishing. It would therefore be a prior ity of these negotiations, in line with our mandate to eliminate certain forms of subsidies that contribute to overfishing and overcapacity, to target large subsidisers that provide 81 % of global subsidies based on proportionate burden and responsibility s haring. 12.18. We are concerned that the term "sustainable development " is often used in a manner that does not reflect the reality that exist in the fishery sector today. The ACP is also on record in saying that special and differential treatment provisions of the agreement should allow for and foster the responsible development of the fisheries sectors in developing countries and LDCs. We believe that we all have an interest in ensuring that fishing at all levels remain sustainable based on determinations and p olicies by national authorities. There is no single common international standard by which sustainability can be assessed , given the different ecological and regulatory frameworks that exist. However, what we need is to ensure that the most appropriate sus tainability standards should be applied , having regard to a myriad of different circumstances that Members find themselves in and the type of information they rely on to take such decisions. We urge Members to constructively engage in discussions in order achieve an outcome by MC12. The ACP does not believe that whatever little time remains should be invested in negotiating a draft ministerial decision on sustainability. All our efforts should go into finalising an outcome on fisheries subsidies negotiation s. 12.19. The representative of Malaysia provided the following statement: 12.20. On fisheries subsidies, Malaysia reiterates her commitment to conclude the negotiations by MC12 as per the mandate. In order to achieve this, we must remain focused on the work in finding compromise. As we have raised previously, especially during the 15 July Fisheries Subsidies Ministerial TNC Meeting, Malaysia is concerned over the revised text particularly on the imbalanced and limited scope of special and differential treatment, as well as the burdensome transparency mechanism. Malaysia is also deeply concerned with the inclusion of non -specific subsidies within the meaning of Article 2 of the SCM Agreement in Article 1.2 of the draft text. We firmly believe that the discipline s on fisheries subsidies should address only specific fisheries subsidies, while providing necessary flexibilities to developing and LDC Members to develop their fisheries sector. We hope that the revised consolidated draft text will be further improved to address these pertinent concerns , as well as incorporate the importance of positioning fish eries in the context of food security and national economy for many Members. The outcome of this negotiation must reflect the WTO principles of non -discriminatory trade, predictability and transparency, fair competition, and encouraging development and eco nomic reform. Let us work together with the outlook of concluding the negotiations as soon as possible. 12.21. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 12.22. This statement is made on behalf of the CARICOM Group, and w e are also aligned with the ACP Group statement on this agenda item. CARICOM wishes to reiterate its commitment to the successful conclusion of the Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations in as short a timeframe as possible. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 88 - This is a commitment which our Ministe rs reinforced at the TNC Meeting at Ministerial level which was convened on 15 July. The importance of these negotiations for CARICOM is without doubt. As we have said many times before, we see a successful outcome in these negotiations as vital to the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of our fisheries sectors. In this regard, we continue to advocate for a fair and balanced agreement that disciplines those most responsible for the damage caused to our global fisheries resources , by the prov ision of massive amounts of harmful subsidies over many years. CARICOM Ministers recently reemphasized that as small fishing nations with under -developed fisheries sectors, our commercial fishing operations are miniscule in comparison to those of the major players. Furthermore, our economies are highly susceptible to global shocks that slow our developmental and growth trajectories. These factors underscore our insistence on including a strong discipline on special and differential treatment in keeping with the Doha Mandate, SDG 14.6 and the decision of our Ministers at MC11. 12.23. The CARICOM group stands ready to engage constructively with Members to reach a successful conclusion to these negotiations. While we reiterate our willingness to negotiate the details with Members, including safeguards and other assurances, we continue to call on Members to be sensitive to the realities of our econo mies. CARICOM Ministers remain committed to achieving a high -standard outcome in these negotiations. Again, we thank Brazil for its submission which contains many of the elements which we see as critical. However, we urge Members to focus their attention o n securing an outcome through the NGR process so as to have an outcome to present to Ministers by MC12. 12.24. The representative of Fiji, on behalf of the Pacific Group , provided the following statement: 12.25. We recogni ze the urgency to complete this negotiation on fisheries subsidies, which is a top priority for the Pacific Group. Pacific Ministers have clear ly indicated on 15 July 2021 that they are committed to concluding this negotiation ahead of MC12. However, they were clear that we must not try to conclude jus t any type of Agreement. We must deliver a balanced and meaningful Agreement at MC12. This Agreement must focus on disciplining harmful subsidies and not fisheries management. It must also provide policy space for small developing Members, especially small island developing states that have little to no fishing capacity at present , must exempt small scale and artisanal sector to support livelihood security and should not undermine Members ' rights under UNCLOS to offer access to fishing in their EEZ on terms they decide. The Pacific Group will engage constructively with Members after the summer break to advance this negotiation. 12.26. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 12.27. My delegation aligns with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDCs. Bangladesh is fully committed to conclude the fisheries subsidy negotiations. We have been seized with the issue for quite some time. Unfortunately, we are still far from rea ching a broad consensus on the content of the revised consolidated text. Let me remind us all that the Doha Ministerial Declaration in 2001 and the Hong Kong Ministerial in 2005 mandated the WTO to take into account the development priorities, poverty redu ction, livelihoods and food security concerns of our countries in any outcome on fisheries subsidies negotiation. SDG 14.6 is built on our Hong Kong mandate, and added a deadline to conclude this negotiation , and now our mandate is to conclude the negotiat ion by MC12. In doing so, we must stick to our mandate , and any deviation would delay the process and make a quick progress in our negotiation difficult. My delegation thanks the delegation of Brazil for this Draft Ministerial Decision and their statement made today. However, to accommodate any new mandate, in our view, will need extra time , and w e are not sure if we have the time. We must strengthen our ongoing efforts and thereby fulfil our collective responsibility. Bangladesh is ready to constructively engage with Members for the conclusion of the negotiation before the MC12. 12.28. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 12.29. As pointed out by many before us, we are hopeful of a conclusion of the ongoing fisheries negotiations. We thank B razil for this proposal and draft Ministerial Decision. Indeed, fisheries subsidies are one of the most important elements of WTO negotiations, carried over from the Doha Agenda. On the proposal itself, it is hard to understand its motivation. Firstly, the proposal is a draft Ministerial decision to be agreed at MC12, aiming for a high standard of environmental sustainability in concluding the discussions. Would this imply that we are not seeking a conclusion at MC12? Also, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 89 - we note that the document affirms a commitment to SDG 14.6, but the language of the draft decision reduces the mandate to only a higher standard of environmental sustainability. It does not mention the most crucial aspect of special and differential treatment, which is the core of SDG 14. 6. While ensuring environmental sustainability is a much -needed objective, we all have a responsibility to our people, to allow them the opportunities for sustainable livelihoods as well. Moreover, while considering sustainability, we must address all aspe cts of sustainable development to make it truly meaningful. The Ministers guided us well on 15 July and we all commit ted to work hard to arrive at an acceptable conclusion to fisheries negotiation. Pakistan is not yet convinced of the usefulness of this Ministerial Decision at this time. 12.30. The representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement: 12.31. The way we view this proposal is that it tends to give different interpretations to development mandates on fisheries subsidies and to prejudge the outcome , disregarding the elements of the mandate in their entirety. No o ne can make attempts to subtract certain elements of the mandate which favour them and suggest that such elements figure in any outcome to be reached. As ministers stated categorically recently, the current negotiations are to address all the elements in t he mandates . They also raised their serious concerns with the current text and the need to provide a balance and the most needed landing -zones, enabling all Members to engage in meaningful negotiations, with the view to arriving at an outcome by MC12. The proposed draft Ministerial Decision seems to reinterpret the mandate in ways Sri Lanka does not find helpful and make s no reference to special and differential treatment, a critical element of the mandate. Any agreement must recognize special and different ial treatment in principle , while understanding that different countries are at different stages of development and current fishing arrangement reflect their current economic capacities. Needs will change with time as countries develop. Any agreement will have to provide balance for current and future needs. We are therefore of the view that the proposal of Brazil lacks a recognition of these considerations. 12.32. The representative of Thailand provided the following statement: 12.33. . Thailand would like to emphasize that fisheries subsidies negotiations are our priority, and would like to call for a conclusion of the fisheries subsidies agreement at the earliest opportunity. The willingness and efforts of all Members in driving the neg otiations forward to the goal, have thus never been more crucial. We cannot afford any further delay in tackling the harmful fisheries subsid ies and preserving the sustainability of fisheries resources, especially at this critical juncture — the WTO needs to prove itself relevant in the changing global trade environment. It is time that we all need to focus on negotiating disciplines and put utmost efforts in bridging the gaps and narrowing the differences, aiming to fulfil the 11th Ministerial Conference m andate and the UN Sustainable Development Goal 14.6. Thailand would like to reaffirm its full commit ment to actively participate in negotiations , and supports the Chair's way forward, leading to a balanced outcome that serves both calls for a meaningful ag reement, effective discipline, and sufficient policy space. Having said that, while we fully understand the positions of the Members, we feel that we already have a lot of issues on the plate. Therefore, we should rather focus on the issues that have been contained in the mandate and have been discussed for many years in order to conclude on what we have already on the plate now. We can continue discussing other issues that some Members may feel are relevant to the discussion on fisheries subsid ies in the f uture. We are not saying that we will not discuss this, but the view is that this is not the right time to do so. 12.34. The representative of the Central African Republic provided the following statement: 12.35. The negotiations on fisheries subsidies have evolved a lot over the past month and in a positive fashion , because Members have a draft text and , as Ministers said during the Ministerial Conference in July, it is a basic document which will enable to pursue and conclude negotiations in this sector of activity. We recently had an exchange and a meeting with the Director -General on the setting up of technical assistance mechanisms and on aid for capacity building in LDCs. We have to differentiate technical assistance from special and differential treatme nt, taking into account the aspects of artisanal fishing. We resort to Members to show flexibility so as to be able to conclude a n agreement based on the principles of sustainability , respecting the goal of SDG 14.6 by 2030. 12.36. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 90 - 12.37. Nigeria wishes to thank Brazil for presenting the draft Ministerial Council Decision. Nigeria adduced four reasons to demonstrate the deviation of the Brazilian Proposal from the objectives of the Fisheries Subsidies negotiations set out in SDG 14.6, the WTO Ministers Mandate and paragraph 9 of Annex D of the 2005 Hong Kong Ministe rial Declaration , as well as the 2001 Doha Ministerial Declaration. Our expectation was that Brazil would either withdraw or modify this proposal. However, this is not the case. 12.38. Given that we have already missed the 2020 timeline to deliver on SDG 14.6 , the least we could do is to work towards outcomes by or before MC12 rather than commit to a future date beyond MC12 for the completion of the negotiations. Furthermore, SDG 14.6 and our Ministers mandate requires that we prohibit and eliminate subsidies whi ch contribute to overcapacity and overfishing and IUU fishing , respectively and not a commitment to curb harmful subsidies being suggested by Brazil. In addition, the proposed objective of "highest standards of environmental sustainability " of the Brazilia n proposal , which is geared towards the introduction of fisheries ' management obligations into the WTO , differs substantially from the objective of "enhancing the mutual supportiveness of trade and environment " set out in the Hong Kong as well as Doha Mini sterial Declaration. We have consistently registered our objection to the introduction of fisheries ' management obligations in the WTO, as this approach has proven in the past to be ineffective in addressing global overcapacity and overfishing problems. Al so, the proposal ignored economic and social pillars of SDGs as well as the need for effective special and differential treatment for developing countries. This proposal falls short of the objectives set out in SDG 14.6 and our Ministers mandate. Consequen tly, we will not support the proposal. 12.39. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 12.40. At this juncture our focus should be placed on negotiat ing the draft text discipline. We need to be optimist ic and ambitious in the negotiation process until MC12. As it has been raised by other colleagues, we believe that there are many aspects of this proposal that need to be looked at and negotiated to reflect the divergent point s of views concerning the discipline s. 12.41. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 12.42. We wish to thank all the delegations that took the time to engage in this debate. I will learn from the comments and try to improve the text through another version. Regarding the Ministerial TNC Meeting that took place on 15 July, my feeling is that the g eneral consensus was of two natures. The text does offer a landing zone despite the imbalances identified by some , and which we can improve. There is also a general understanding that we simply do not have another twenty years to block this process. Twenty years is enough, let us find a solution. Another point, which is rather surprising as I heard in many statements an already overcome dichotomy between the environment and people. The very notion of sustainability integrates those two dimensions. When maki ng a reference to a UN mandate referring to sustainability, this is already integrated. This is not a discussion among biologists. We are not here together to save fish because we love fish , we may love fish , it is not about that. As we preserve the enviro nment, it is integrated. Either we preserve the fish and have fishermen communities, or this is going to disappear. I suggest a very simple example. When we go to the summer break, let the delegates go back to their capitals and to the fishermen communitie s and ask a very simple question: do you want to wait another twenty years during which your fish stock is going to be reduced by seventy or eighty %? That is the price we are going to pay in order to have policy space, are you happy with that? We will not be able to fish but we will have all the policy space we need, and maybe in another twenty years we will have a blooming fish industry. But we are going to pay the price. The price for those abstract notions is paid by the people on the ground. We need to be clear about those things, otherwise the debate is never going to evolve. I heard today that there was a lack of new ideas in this debate, so perhaps I can bring new ideas. We need to update the terms of the debate. It is not possible that we say the sam e things after twenty years. As we propose high standards in sustainability, this is about people. It is about current and future generations. I repeat this very simple question: do we have another twenty years to waste? I do not think we do. It is time to move on and reach an agreement. 12.43. The representative of Cameroon provided the following statement: 12.44. Our delegation joins the statements made by the African and ACP Groups. We believe that the best resonance of this proposal by Brazil would be reflected in th e real, true commitment of all WT/GC/M/19 2 - 91 - parties to be able to give a concrete meaning to the mandate in these negotiations. The mandate clearly spells out that we have to prohibit subsidies that contribute to overfishing and overcapacity , to eliminate subsidies to IUU fishing and to guarantee special and differential treatment . The appropriate special and differential treatment is both operational and effective. This is precisely where we should focus our interests. In fact, our Ministers said that the current text, although it does include some appreciable elements, moves away from the initial mandate regarding the true and effective prohibition of subsidies to overcapacity and overfish ing. Over and above that, we have provisions that tend to give legitimacy to practices which have been leading to overexploited species. 12.45. Regarding the elimination of IUU subsidies, the current provisions are not precise enough. They are not operative from a legal point of view and create legal conflicts. Our delegation has regularly highlighted this and expressed its reservation regarding this. We hope that the discussions in the future will make it possible to redefine or come back to the initial terms of our mandate. It is only by giving a meaning to our mandate that we will ensure sustainability as it can be found in the terms of our mandate. This is precisely what Cameroon has repetitively stressed. Our Minister once again repeated this. We welcome thos e that have expressed their commitment. We hope that in the coming months we will be able to come back to the initial negotiations and give them a meaning which would be in line with our mandate and with sustainability. 12.46. The General Council took note of the statements. 13 G90 DECLARATION ON SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT – COMMUNICATION FROM SOUTH AFRICA ON BEHALF OF THE G90 (WT/GC/234 ) 13.1. The Chair recalled that the item had been included in the agenda of the General Council by the delegation of South Africa on behalf of the G90, together with the communication in document WT/GC/234. 13.2. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 13.3. The Declaration highlights t he disproportionate impact of COVID -19 on developing countries, especially LDCs, LLDCs, NFIDCs, SIDS and SVEs, not only as a health crisis in the short term but as a devastating social and economic crisis over the months and years to come, and thereby exacerbating the development gap, inequality and asymmetric economic development patterns that already existed before the crisis. 13.4. According to the OECD Global Outlook on Financing for Sustainable Development 2021, the COVID -19 crisis hit at the dawn of the De cade of Action for the SDGs (2020 -2030). The health crisis triggered an economic crisis of long -lasting effects on inequalities and development. It hit more brutally countries lacking the financial and technological means to deal with long -term health emergencies and the necessary restrictions on movement of people and general commerce. 13.5. Based on this report, more developing countries have entered into economic recession than at any time since the Second World War, with more than 73% (90 of 122) of low and middle -income countries impacted. According to the World Bank, C OVID -19 has already added 120 million to the count of the world poor and the figure is expected to go up to 150 million by end 2021. The World Bank also estimates that more than 80% of the "new poor " will be in middle income countries. 13.6. The economic impact of the pandemic is much wider as it affects all sectors including agriculture, manufacturing and services, deepening the vulnerabilities of developing countries who have limited fiscal space to respond to the crisis. 13.7. The G90 recalls that the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO) recognizes the "need for positive efforts designed to ensure that developing countries, and especially the least developed amongst them, secure a share of growth in international trade commensurate with the needs of their economic development. " The multilateral trading system has, therefore been quite conscious of the differing levels of development among Members of the WTO and that i nternational trade should play a role to assist developing and least -developed countries to increase their share of international trade. S pecial and differential treatment is therefore vital for developing and LDCs as a means towards that end. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 92 - 13.8. The levels o f development, in terms of infrastructure, technology, industrialisation, digitalisation, prosperity, etc., are quite different between developed countries and the developing and least -developed countries. S pecial and differential treatment was incorporate d into the multilateral trading system as a means to ensure that trade can play a role to allow countries at the lower level of development to catch -up and to effectively integrate into global trade. Therefore, Special and differential treatment is at the core of the efforts to level the playing field for developing countries and least -developed countries and bridge the gaps separating them from their developed counterparts. 13.9. Strengthening and operationalising special and differential treatment provisions i n line with the mandate in paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration is, therefore , now a matter of urgency. It will enable developing countries to diversify and industrialise so as to accelerate their recovery and promote their resilience to future shocks. The G90 is concerned by the lack of progress in the negotiations on special and differential treatment in the CTD SS. 13.10. The categorization of special and differential treatment provisions in WTO Agreements is described in WT/COMTD/W/258 and includes : i) provisions aimed at increasing the trade opportunities of developing country Members (15 provisions in various WTO agreements) , accord high priority to the reduction and elimination of barriers to products currently or potentially of particular export interest to developing countries, including customs duties and other restrictions which differentiate unreasonably between such products in their primary and in their processed forms , or devising concrete measures to promote the developme nt of export potential and to facilitate access to export markets for the products of interests to developing countries; ii) provisions under which WTO Members should safeguard the interests of developing country Members (47) , which would include for examp le refraining from introducing or increasing customs duties or introducing non-tariff barriers on products of interest to developing countries , or have regard to the trade interests of developing countries when introducing trade measures; iii) flexibility of commitments, of action, and use of policy instruments (44) , for example making provision s for asymmetry in trade negotiations with developed countries , not expecting reciprocity for commitments - Article 6.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture would fall in this category; iv) transitional time-periods (27) ; v) technical assistance (25) ; and vi) provisions relating to LDC Members (25) . 13.11. The Declaration on Special and Differential Treatment is put forward by the G90 with a view to ensure effective integration o f developing countries in global trade. Para graph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration recogni zes special and differential treatment as a treaty-embedded right. Special and differential treatment for developing and least developed countries is an integra l part of the architecture of the multilateral trading system. Para graph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration mandates that the special and differential treatment provisions that are already included in the existing WTO Agreements be reviewed and strengt hened to make them more precise, effective and operational for developing and least -developed countries. 13.12. Therefore, the CTD -SS derives its mandate from paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration and has to deliver in accordance with its mandate. Out of the 155 provisions, the G90 has only prioritized 10 which are critical to structural transformation and to ensure effective integration of developing countries in global trade. The G90 is not asking for blanket exemptions from commitments. The proposal focuses on operationalising the collective commitments of the WTO Membership in several WTO agreements that will facilitate the integration of developing and least - developed countries into the multilateral trading system. 13.13. The G90 remains ready to engage with all Members in good faith to find solutions. This is the long outstanding issue that needs to be resolved by MC12. In conclusion, Chair, the Declaration emphasizes the need to preserve special and differential treatment as a central tenet of the WTO system. 13.14. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 13.15. The revised special and differential treatment proposals tabled by the G90 are critical to increasing trade opportunities of developing countries and L DCs, speed up their post COVID economic recovery, and support building of resilient economies. The discussion of the 10 agreement - specific special and differential treatment proposals of the G -90 in the CTD -SS is consistently being frustrated by developed countries who , through their respective statements in meetings of the CTD WT/GC/M/19 2 - 93 - SS, consistently reiterated their unwillingness to engage in the discussions of G -90 agreement - specific special and differential treatment proposals. This sends the wrong signal and could erode the faith of developing and least developed countries have in the multilateral trading system. It also risks paralyzing the multilateral trading system, should developing countries also reciprocate this gesture in other WTO negotiations and works. The best approach is for developed countries to shed light on specific elements of the G -90 proposals that poses difficulties (if any) so we can collectively discuss and work towar ds meaningful outcomes on the issue of special and differential treatment in line with para graph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration. 13.16. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 13.17. The African Group s upports and associates itself with the statement by South Africa on behalf of the ACP on the G90 Declaration on special and differential treatment as contained in WT/GC/234. The CTD -SS discussion on the ten special and differential treatment agreement spec ific proposals was a necessary process , as it provided the G90 an opportunity to further elaborate on what practical steps need to be undertaken to respond to and deliver on the mandate under paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration review and stre ngthen special and differential treatment to make it more precise, effective and operational for developing and least -developed countries. 13.18. The credibility of the WTO and the multilateral trading system will be all the stronger if the benefits from trade ar e equitably shared amongst all its Members. Unfortunately, the reality has been rather different, with many developing and least developed countries yet to reap the benefits promised at the establishment of the WTO, or when they acceded. The C OVID -19 pande mic has been a stark reminder of this reality, showing up the vast inequalities among WTO Members, including in their ability to respond to the health crisis, navigate the economic consequences therefore and rebuild. Figures are pointing to extreme poverty levels increasing to as much as 40 million people in Africa as a result of C ovid-19, whilst our economies continue to deal with the consequences of GDP contractions which have largely affected the most vulnerable within our societies. 13.19. It is important to e mphasise that special and differential treatment is a right that was consciously enshrined in the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO) and cannot all of a sudden be treated as a flexibility that its beneficiaries should justi fy or make a case for. We are, therefore also concerned at the level of disengagement by our developed country partners on this critical component of the architecture of the WTO , principally meant to assist developing and least -developed countries catch up with their developed country partners and increase their share of international trade. We nevertheless look forward to the next steps in formal mode in the CTD SS. An outcome on special and differential treatment at MC12 is critical if we are to restore the trust that the majority of our populations have on the WTO . 13.20. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 13.21. Pakistan welcomes this submission by South Africa on behalf of the G90 . Pakistan is a staunch supporter of special and differential treatment as a fundamental tenet of this rules based multilateral system. Without effective, meaningful, and appropriate special and differential treatment for developing and least developed countries, the e ntire edifice of the WTO is threatened. The G90 proposals, similar to the fisheries ' subsidies negotiations have been under discussion for the last 20 years. The demands of developing countries are completely justified and in fact, as time has gone by, new challenges to development have emerged underscoring the absolute necessity of these demands. Unfortunately, as in some other areas of interest to developing countries, meaningful engagement on the issues by some delegations is disappointing. It is high ti me that the G90 proposals are given their due attention and are accepted as a package in favour of development. This would be a strong signal to the world that our organi zation stands for and can actually deliver on the development pillar 13.22. The representativ e of Chad, on behalf of the LDC , provided the following statement: 13.23. The LDC Group is part of the G20 and echoes the statement made by South Africa on the specific proposals relating to the agreement on special and differential treatment. The issue of special and differential treatment is in our opinion a pivotal one, conce rning multilateral trade negotiations WT/GC/M/19 2 - 94 - here at the WTO. The issue of special and differential treatment is, we might say, the raison d'être of our organization and there is no doubt that the escalating COVID -19 crisis is set to have a disproportionate impac t on developing and least developed countries , not only in terms of the short - term health impacts but also as economic and social crisis that will prove devastating over the course of the coming months and years. Global poverty may affect more than two bil lion people and the economic and social fallouts from the crisis will affect all of our societies. The goals of the proposal made by the G90 include building -in flexibilities to encourage structural transformation, industrialization and the diversification of developing countries and particularly LDCs' economies. However, the arguments put forward by the G90 to support this proposal haven 't yet led to consensual outcomes , primarily due to the rejection of that by some Members. They see the G90 proposal as a threat to the multilateral system and those same Members have expressed a certain reluctance , even though they have shown themselves to be open to discussions around a solution. We feel quite the opposite, our opinion is that the implementation of the pro posals put forward by the G90 will certainly increase the stability of global trade and bolster the competitiveness of economies for developed as well as developing countries and LDCs. A number of meetings of the CTD SS have taken place. We have asked Memb ers a number of questions and informal discussions have taken place around the different proposals so that we can find the best possible way forward towards a consensus. We tried to consolidate our convergences under the leadership of the Chairperson . We are willing to engage constructively on the issues being dealt with by the CTD SS as we look to MC12 and beyond. 13.24. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP, provided the following statement: 13.25. Special and differential treatment is a fundamental pillar of the WTO and should not be dispensed with in current nor future agreements . We believe that an outcome for MC12 based on the G90 proposals would assist our national efforts to stabilize our trade imbalances, including those arising from the COVID -19 pandemic, build back better and successfully integrate into the global economy and global trading system. In this regard the ACP supports the G90 Declaration on Special and Differential Treatment contained in WT/GC/234. The COVID -19 pa ndemic is expected to slow down or even reverse some of the gains made in the realization of the SDGs, as indicated in the Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020 (United Nations, 2020). According to the OECD Global Outlook on Financing for Sustainable D evelopment 2021, the COVID -19 crisis hit us at the dawn of the Decade of Action for the SDGs (2020 -2030). Based on this report, more developing countries entered economic recession than at any time since the Second World War, with more than 73% (90 of 122) of low and middle -income countries impacted. 13.26. Increasing the share of international trade of developing and least developed countries and empowering them with policy space and flexibilities to enable them to diversify and industrialise their economies wil l accelerate their recovery and promote their resilience to future shocks. Strengthening and operationalising special and differential treatment provisions in line with the mandate in paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration is, therefore, now a ma tter of urgency and survival for our people. The ACP Group also wants to thank the Chair of the CTD SS for her monumental efforts to facilitate discussion of the G90 Agreement Specific Proposals (ASPs). The G90 has made efforts to negotiate in good faith. As the ACP Group , we remain concerned about the lack of engagement by some Members. The ACP Group stands ready to engage with the broader membership on how special and differential treatment can be made more effective and appropriate to the prevailing circ umstance that many developing, and least developed countries continue to face. As we move towards MC12, clear parameters to deal with special and differential treatment need to be agreed upon and put in place. We ask for a further engagement on the G90 Agr eement Specific Proposals to be facilitated by the Chair in order to finalise recommendations to the Ministerial Conference. 13.27. The representative of Vanuatu , on behalf of the Pacific Group , provided the following statement: 13.28. The Pacific Group strongly suppor ts this declaration and the ACP Group statement. The Pacific Group underlines the importance of special and differential treatment in helping us overcome the multi -faceted challenges that we face owing to our inherent structural and geographic characterist ics as small island developing states and SVEs, combined with our exposure to frequent and severe natural disasters. These challenges have been exacerbated by COVID -19 which has disproportionately affected developing countries especially Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Small Vulnerable Economies (SVEs) . The G90 proposals therefore presented practical ways to WT/GC/M/19 2 - 95 - address the challenges posed by WTO rules, that many developing countries face in trying to integrate into the multilateral trading syst em. These proposals remain important to the Pacific Group. These proposals aim to make special and differential treatment provisions more operational, effective and precise, to fulfil the mandate of paragraph 44 of the Doha Declaration. 13.29. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 13.30. CARICOM also aligns itself with the statement delivered by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP. We also thank South Africa for its statement as well as its submission on beha lf of the G90 contained in document WT/GC/234. We reiterate the importance that CARICOM assigns to preserving both the principle and practice of special and differential treatment for developing and least -developed countries in the WTO. In this regard, we believe that the WTO should be moving in the direction of strengthening special and differential treatment provisions , with a view to making them more precise, effective and operational , as articulated in paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration. CARICOM is comprised of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Small Vulnerable Economies (SVEs) which face many constraints that reinforce the need for special and differential treatment . We have spoken on numerous occasions about our vulnerability to n atural disasters, climate change and other exogenous shocks, such as the current COVID -19 pandemic, which tend to have a more acute impact on our economies compared to many other countries. We are further hampered by high levels of public debt, low economi c growth and an undiversified economic structure. According to the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, our high debt dilemma has not been principally driven by policy missteps. Rather, it finds its roots in external shocks, compound ed by the inherent structural weaknesses and vulnerabilities confronting Caribbean SIDS and their limited capacity to respond, including with respect to extreme weather events, climate change attendant challenges and most recently, the COVID -19 pandemic. A nother major contributing factor to this situation includes the underperformance of our export sectors, partly due to a decline in the competitiveness of our economies. CARICOM countries are further confronted by large infrastructure gaps, including physic al trade and e -commerce infrastructure. The development challenges highlighted above are all interlinked , and the binding constraints at home also present binding constraints abroad , to the extent that they also prevent us from integrating further into the multilateral trading system. It is in this context that recourse to special and differential treatment becomes a necessary condition for us to participate meaningfully in the multilateral trading system. We fully endorse the 12 points elaborated by South Africa on behalf of the G90 in the proposal before us. We call on all WTO Members to engage constructively with the G90 on the proposed declaration and in other theatres where we meet to discuss special and differential treatment . 13.31. The representative of Central African Republic provided the following statement: 13.32. My delegation firmly supports South Africa's statement. We remain committed to paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration on special and differential treatment , with the view to strengthening it to make it more effective and operational , to strengthen the capacity of developing countries and least developed countries as best as we can to gain market access. Special and differential treatment is a significant element within the multilateral tra ding system. Today we are deeply concerned to see the lack of progress in negotiations on special and differential treatment under the CTD SS. That lack of progress will have consequences such as the marginalization of developing countries on international markets and they will have a very small share of international trade that puts their populations in circumstances of extreme poverty. We welcome the statements made by the LDC Group and the African Group calling upon Members to return to paragraph 44 of the Doha Declaration to enable developing countries and least developed countries to integrate better into the multilateral trading system and to overcome the various obstacles to their development. 13.33. The representative of the European Union provided the foll owing statement: 13.34. The European Union has on numerous occasions underlined its support for special and differential treatment of WTO Members , especially for LDCs but also for other Members who have specific needs. It is our priority to ensure effective, pre cise and operational special and differential treatment in the WTO , in order to enable these Members to apply and benefit from the agreements concluded. The European Union firmly believes that if WTO is to prosper, special and differential treatment must b ecome much more granular, in function of an individual Member's demonstrated needs and capacities. Future differentiation should be designed in terms of specific individual country needs at the sectoral or activity level , rather than calling for a block ex emption of a large category WT/GC/M/19 2 - 96 - of Members. Furthermore, the European Union considers that each developing country's need for special and differential treatment should be assessed on a case -by-case and evidence basis. We take note of the declaration submitted by South Africa on behalf of the G90. The European Union is of the opinion that continuing the discussion based on the 10 proposals of the G -90, will neither lead to an outcome nor provide the basis for increasing understanding and cooperation be tween Members, which is much -needed. 13.35. The representative of China provided the following statement: 13.36. The prolonged pandemic has caused economic and social devastation to developing members and LDCs in particular. China shares the sentiments with other devel oping Members on the unprecedented challenges in fighting against the pandemic. Special and differential treatment , in this context, should continue to enhance its role in facilitating developing Members ' integration into the multilateral system, and helpi ng their economic recovery in the post -pandemic period as well. China supports to have the issues raised by the G90 well taken into account in related negotiations and consultations , to provide the necessary flexibilities and policy space to developing Members, particularly LDCs , to ensure that the multilateral trading system will help them achieve the development goal, and to have an early economic recovery against the current and future possible pandemics. China is willing to shoulder the responsibilities commensurate with our development level and ability. We are committed to our efforts in the WTO to assist other developing Members ' better integration into the multilateral trading system and better response to the COVID -19 pandemic. 13.37. The representative of Kenya provided the following statement: 13.38. We align with the statements by Mauritius on behalf of the African Group and Jamaica on behalf of the ACP Group. special and differential treatment is an integral principle of the WTO, and the respective provisions and Decisions are important to many developing country Members and LDCs, as they implement their obligations in the respective WTO agreements. It is therefore important to uphold the existing special and differential treatment provisions and follow up on their implementation. It is equally important to consider the revised special and differential treatment proposals tabled by the G90 and integrate them in WTO work. The devastating impact that COVID - 19 has had on many developing countries and LDCs ' economies calls for concerted efforts to protect many lives and livelihoods in the Global South. The pandemic has exacerbated the vulnerabilities of these countries, most of which are yet to recover from the detrimental effects of natural disasters caused by climate change. Recovery from the effects of the pandemic will certainly be slow and protracted and will largely depend on the interventions that countries deploy. Special and differential treatment is therefore critical for these countries to effectiv ely mitigate against the effects of the prevailing crises, build resilience and increase trade opportunities. We ought to deliver on our mandate under paragraph 44 of the Doha Declaration, with respect to special and differential treatment , to facilitate t he integration of developing countries and LDCs in the multilateral trading system. 13.39. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 13.40. We all agree that special and differential treatment remains an important tool for supporting WTO Members with genuine need - in particular for supporting LDCs in their integration into the multilateral trading system and enjoy the benefits of this system. This should obviously continue. But, we all recogni ze that the current mechanism for awarding a nd claiming special and differential treatment requires reform. A more targeted approach based on specific and identified needs is required to ensure those Members with real need are supported during current and future negotiations — a granularity to which the European Union just referred. Both at, and in the run -up to MC12, the United Kingdom would like to see concrete progress towards such a more balanced and targeted approach to special and differential treatment , and we look forward to engaging with further Members to seek common ground in the weeks ahead. 13.41. The representative of India provided the following statement: 13.42. Special and differential treatment provisions are an integral part of the multilateral trading system. They continue to be a critical aspect of the WTO 's framework and a non -negotiable right of all developing countries, for which they have already paid. They are to be looked at, not as WT/GC/M/19 2 - 97 - exceptions to the general rules , but as an inherent objective of the Multilateral Trading Syst em, something our Ministers agreed to in Doha. Given the concerns expressed by Members regarding the effectiveness of special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO Agreements, our Ministers in paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Decision, had g iven a mandate to review all special and differential treatment provisions with a view to strengthening them and making them more precise, effective and operational. Although Members have been discussing these issues since 2002, unfortunately, it has not b een possible to secure tangible progress with regard to this Ministerial mandate. The proposal clearly demonstrates the pressing need to agree to the 10 Agreement Specific Proposals to enable the social and economic transformation required by developing an d least developed countries to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to ensure that no one is left behind. The same frustration what we see in fisheries negotiations, should be reflected here also. As we say WTO is about people, certainly th is is about people. India believes that the G90 proposal provides a useful basis to advance work in this important area. We appreciate the initiatives by CTD SS Chair Ambassador Kadra to have discussions in the informal configuration for 10 items. We hope for a meaningful outcome by MC12. We urge all the Members to collectively work towards finalizing this , like we are working for fisheries negotiation. 13.43. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 13.44. We take note of the proponent s' statement. We also note that the proponents have repeatedly tabled their proposals in the CTD SS, even after Members have reviewed and discussed them, and have been unable to agree to them. We have invited South Africa to pursue a different approach – one that focuses on how to better integrate LDCs and similarly -situated Members into the rules -based trading system. We also sense there are many in the G90 who might be interested in pursuing a different approach. Such a result could be advanced by helping Members fully implement WTO rules. WTO rules are building blocks for sustainable development, not impediments to development. 13.45. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 13.46. My delegation thanks South Africa for presenting this proposal on behalf of the G90 and the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of LDCs. This communication highlights some critical challenges of the developing countries , particularly LDCs , which are furt her aggravated by the ongoing pandemic. Our colleague from South Africa and other delegations have elaborated on the current context and the long -term impact of this public health crisis on the lives, livelihoods and economies of the developing south. Even prior to the pandemic the developing countries , particularly LDCs, needed support from Members to bring them into the mainstream global trade. The proposal under consideration focuses on operationalizing the collective commitments of the membership and some agreements that will facilitate the integration of developing and least developed countries meaningfully into the world trading system. As we have emphasized in other occasions, and reiterated by many before me, special and differential treatment for de veloping and least developed countries is an integral part of the architecture of the multilateral trading system, it is a treaty - embedded right. The objective of this exercise is therefore not to discuss the concept or rationale of S&DT but to make it a r eality. We believe that the G90 communication generated discussion and that will encourage Members to engage constructively so that a positive outcome is possible. 13.47. The representative of Cameroon provided the following statement: 13.48. Cameroon supports the state ment made by the African and ACP Groups and is in favour of the proposal put forward by the G90. The reason why we are part of this organi zation is the hope to have fair trade , that is rules -based trade , because that could guarantee the necessary resources to development. Special and differential treatment is a rule of fairness which takes into account the differences between Member s. There is a need to adjust the rules to the development needs of the countries and to modify special and differential treatm ent according to the mandate s we have received, to make them operational . Moving away from the WTO is not the objective pursued by the parties. That is why we invite all Members to show openness and to be ready to examine the proposal of the G90 so as to come to a consensus at MC12. Of course, we need more transparency and predic tability, and we want to ensure greater inclusiveness thanks to operational special and differential treatment . We do not want a body that strengthens some and weakens others. COVID -19 has shown the vulnerability of states and the interest there is in buil ding a multilateral system which is fair, inclusive and which takes on board the hopes and expectations of all parties. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 98 - 13.49. The representative of Zimbabwe provided the following statement: 13.50. Zimbabwe aligns itself with the statements delivered by the delegatio ns of South Africa and Mauritius on behalf of the G90 and the Africa n Group respectively. We also share the views expressed by Chad and Jamaica on behalf of the LDC and the ACP Groups . Special and differential treatment is an integral part of the multilate ral trading system, providing policy -space for developing Members to fulfil their development goals and to more effectively participate in the global trading system. Paragraph 44 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration on special and differential treatment recognizes the need to review all provisions, to strengthen them, and make them more precise, effective, and operational. This was a very clear acknowledgement and recognition of the special needs of developing and least -developed countries, given their lower levels of development. The growing evidence of market failure, the uncertainties with regard to the future of international cooperation, the complexities of problems caused by widening global inequalities, have underscored, as never before, the critical i mportance of special and differential treatment for developing countries. The G90 proposal on special and differential treatment reflects the widely -shared and longstanding, legitimate concerns of many developing countries. Zimbabwe agrees on the need to s trengthen special and differential treatment provisions by making them binding and according them due legal status. We have noted with great concern a certain reluctance, by some Members, to engage on this proposal. We call on those Members to reflect deep ly, to engage and to use the proposal as a basis leading towards an outcome which will ensure that special and differential treatment is adapted to meet the challenges inherent to the ongoing evolution of the global economic and trading environment. 13.51. The representative of Nepal provided the following statement: 13.52. My delegation wishes to extend sincere appreciation to the Chair of the CTD -SS and thanks South Africa for introducing this agenda on behalf of the G90. I wish to associate with the statement delivered by South Africa on behalf of the G90 and Chad on behalf of the LDC group. My delegation supports this proposed declaration on spec ial and differential treatment and urges all Members to show flexibility to conclude this through the upcoming Ministerial Conference. 13.53. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 13.54. We fully share the views of the G90 that special and d ifferential treatment is central in the WTO system . It should be preserved and reinforced in order to ensure equity , and must remain an integral part of the WTO Agreements and be part of any deliverable at MC12. 13.55. The representative of Sri Lanka provided th e following statement: 13.56. Looking at the historical background which sets the justification for introducing the principle of special and differential treatment into the multilateral trading system, what Sri Lanka has witnessed is that the concept has been dil uted in all aspects disregarding the very purpose of it. Members are to bear in mind that the more this principle is set aside , the more we begin to see difficulties. They should not be seen only as a tool for development but also as one of the core principles upon which the multilateral trading system has been established. As a positive note, many countries have reaped the benefits due to the preservation of this principle , but it is not the case for all developing countries . Members should engage meaningfully in addressing the inherent weaknesses to make those provisions more timely, effective and useful for developing countries , as some of them are ineff ective at the implementation level. These issues have been with us for more than decades even before the fisheries subsidies negotiations have commenced , but we adopt a different interest when it comes to dealing with the interest of humankind over fish in this situation. 13.57. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 13.58. The ten agreement specific proposals that are discussed in the CTD -SS are proposals that are en grained in existing agreements and Members would have taken due note of t he number of provisions that exist in the number of agreements , including the six categories that define what special and differential treatment is in WTO agreements. Therefore, the role and mandate of the CTD-SS is derived from paragraph 44 of the Doha Mi nisterial Declaration . It is about making those existing provisions more precise, effective and operational, because there has been a view in certain agreements by the WTO membership in recognition that , even though those special and differential WT/GC/M/19 2 - 99 - treatment provisions exist in WTO agreements , it has been very difficult for developing countries to make use of them and invoke them, so that they are able to advance their development. It is in that regard that , collectively , the WTO membership agreed to give this mandate to the CTD -SS. Therefore , the G90 , out of 155 provisions , have prioritized only ten . These ten provisions are prioritized because of their effect on structural transformation , which will then advance the interest of developing countries , but also to ensure that those specific areas where there are barriers to entry for products of export of interest to developing countries are also addressed. The G90 remains ready to engage with all Members with a view to engage in good faith discussions , and hopefully solution - oriented discussions , so that we can address this long outstanding issue by MC12. 13.59. The Director -General provided the following statement: 13.60. Since I am not in the Chair, this gives me an opportunity to make a few remarks on this issue, because the CTD SS is also under the TNC. One of the things we have to look at is what has happened, or is happening, to developing economies and particularly the least-developed, with the advent of COVID -19. I think this is really important. All the numb ers are going in the wrong direction and, today, the headline is about the IMF emphasis on a "K -shaped" recovery. Prior to COVID -19, there was an emerging convergence of developing countries with developed countries , even LDCs were not doing that badly. Bu t COVID -19 has set the world back considerably and set the poor countries back considerably. So, this two -track or "K -shape" recovery, of course, is exacerbated by the inequity in access to vaccine s, which we are here to try to find ways to solve. 13.61. I think that where we are now behoves us to step back and look at the issue of SDT with fresh eyes. I have heard talks to offer a fresh approach. I really think that we need to examine where we are in light of what is happening to poor countries from COVID -19. No w, since I came, almost five months ago, I have seen frustration building in the CTD SS particularly on the part of Ambassador Hassan, with whom I had several meetings. I am very grateful for the continuous push. I think that the non -engagement is what is leading to the frustration. What I am happy about today is to hear the willingness to engage, I think we have to engage; we cannot just let this issue go by year after year. There is indeed equal frustration . This General Council has been an eye -opener in listening to Members talk about how stuck everything is. There is no pride in collective failure at everything, whether on SDT or fisheries, and so on. There should not be any pride in that. We have to tell ourselves that we need to move on this SDT issue. I think we have to find a way to engage with the CTD SS, to make progress in light of what is happening. I have heard some Members say that they are willing to take responsibility commensurate to their leve l of development. Maybe we should think about looking into how we can make this work. I have heard others they say that they are willing to support LDCs and other Members who are on the poor end of the scale to avail themselves of SDT , we should look at th at. All I am trying to say is that there is merit to looking at what SDT can do , because COVID -19 has put us in a different position, and we have to find a way to engage. We should not allow ourselves to get to MC12 and make this an issue of rancour. 13.62. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 13.63. I would like to clarify that the non -engagement is on both sides . I am a bit troubled by this axiomatic connection between economic difficulty and SDT. Why are we in the WTO not discuss ing the connection between pandemic -related stress and the support that can be provided by implementing WTO rules ? Why is that not , first and foremost , our concern about how trade rules promote resilience and provide a backstop to the crisis, rather than p resenting them as if they are the cause of the difficulties ? I think that the CTD SS needs to reflect on , whether or not , we agree that the underlying rules support development ; or do we reject the WTO rules as somehow being anti-development? I think Brazil has made this point numerous times. I am a little bit concerned with considering that special and differential treatment is the answer to the COVID -19 response , because I believe that supporting integration through WTO rule s is the response . Special and differential treatment is an accommodation to help people get to the same endpoint, not a carve - out or an elimination of those rules for certain Members. 13.64. The Director -General provided the following statement: 13.65. Thank you for the comments made . I agree with some of what was said. The point is not that SDT is the solution to COVID -related stress, but because there is this stress, there is a need to look at how countries can have better access and use th at as part of their recove ry efforts . You are WT/GC/M/19 2 - 100 - absolutely right , integration into the trading system is very important because that is how countries are going to make progress. Right now , they are falling further behind. Africa's share of global trade was almost 3% and it is falling back to 2.4%. It is getting worse. The point I am trying to make is for some Members to be able to avail themselves of some of this. By getting better integrated into the trading system they may indeed recover better and faster from COVID -19. It is not that SDT will solve the economic problems per se - I think we are both saying the same thing in different ways. I just wanted us to know that this issue is pervading all the discussions. We should listen again today – there are nuances which show that peop le are actually moving together in the right direction ; but because we do not listen to each other as well , that prevents us from coming together. We should look at this issue and the circumstances. We are looking towards coming together. Whether it is a new approach or the same approach, I think we should engage on this issue . 13.66. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 13.67. I agree that a real conversation is required . There are two aspects to this conversation . One part of the conver sation included existing commitments ; existing flexibilities that are not effective ; an agreement and a mandate. Then there is another part of the conversation that says : "how do we deal with special and differential treatment going forward ?". That conversation also needs to be held . But there is also this assumption that , when we talk about special and differential treatment , we are talking about blanket exemptions from agreements. If Members go through the ten Agreement - specific proposals, it is not about blanket exemptions . In fact, in most cases it is about additional time for those Members that are facing specific constraints , whether in implementing the SPS or TBT measures . Those are the t ype of conversations that we need to have . In addition to that , we have this specific challenge now with COVID -19 that has a disproportionate impact on developing countries . Flexibilities will be required in terms of rebuilding industries that are struggling as a result of the pandemic . What role will the WTO have ? The WTO has a critical role in promoting economic recovery. That is another conversation that we need to have . All of these conversations are quite urgent . 13.68. The Director -General spoke abo ut the frustration , I agree that probably the frustration is on both sides . That frustration arises from the fact that we have commitments that we have taken and Ministerial mandates that have been agreed on. But we do not implement those . And then the developing countries are asking themselves how Members can take on new commitments when there is no respect of existing commitments and mandates ? There are a number of long outstanding issues that I think are critical to development and that we need to look a t. What I appreciate from this conversation is that all of us agree that special and differential treatment is an important aspect and that we need to have a real conversation. 13.69. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 13.70. Special and differential treatment , as everybody knows , came as a result of the fact that we have Members who do not have the capacity to implement their obligations. We have explained the frustration and lack of engagement . Everyone that participated in discussions prior to MC10 will confirm that a certain number of special and differential treatment request s were tabled at MC10 , but the y did not receive any attention . In fact, at that time, developing countries reduced the numbers of requests to about 25 . At the end of MC10, they had not been considered. The same requests were taken to MC11 and they were not given much consideration. Under the CTD -SS, we have been engaged in discussions through the G90 , but the other side hasn't made much effort. That is why we are reiterating that there is a need for constructive engagement . This should be tabled and discussed thoroughly. I am happy that the other side will now be fully engaged . We believe that , if that is done , we will find a way out and then at least the de veloping countries will be able to get their required benefits and will be able to address some other challenges they are facing in terms of capacity. 13.71. The representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement: 13.72. We appreciate the DG 's intervention to day put ting special and differential treatment and other important issues on the table. W e should not be drawing divisions among the issues , all issues are important to many countries . We see special and differential treatment as an important issue which gives us the assurance and the required confidence that the organization is working for all I fully endorse what has been stated by South Africa . I would also like to comment on the level of WT/GC/M/19 2 - 101 - engagement and the frustration , as we have seen that in the CTD-SS we have been presenting proposal s in a vacuum. We presented examples of serious empirical evidence suggesting how some of the special and differential treatment provisions – as currently draf ted and enshrined in relevant Agreements – are preventing us from making full use of those flexibilities. The response we receive in the CTD -SS is that other Members are listening , but they are not even commenting on the proposal and we receive no follow -up questions. Engagement should come from both sides if we are to achieve some meaningful outcomes on this topic . 13.73. We attach high significance to this issue and we share d our experiences. Some of these experiences are a result of the pandemic as we have not been able to make use of these provisions , and the pandemic has aggravated other issues. Hence, it is good to hear that we can look at this topic from a different perspective. Confidence building should be a priority for this institution , because that would set a motion for us to negotiate and agree on many new disciplines including fisheries subsidies. The reason why special and differential treatment has become a crucial issue in the fisheries subsidies negotiations , is the lack of confi dence and trust. Therefore, developing countries are very cautious about negotiating any discipline in the future. If the institution is to produce new agreements and obligations, then this issue has to be fixed once and for all. 13.74. The representative of Came roon provided the following statement: 13.75. Cameroon aligns itself with the statements by the African and ACP Groups, and endorses the proposal submitted by the G90. Our states joined this organization essentially because of their hope that fair and equitabl e trade would guarantee them access to the resources required for their development. The word "fair" refers to clear, predictable and fixed rules, while the notion of "equity" relates to the adjustment of these rules to states' economic and social realitie s, in order to prevent injustices according to the principle of summum jus, summa injuria. Special and differential treatment is thus based on this notion of equity, taking into account the existing disparities between Members and, accordingly, the need to avoid obstructing the development of beneficiary countries (developing countries and LDCs). Seeking to considerably alter the modalities for the enjoyment of special and differential treatment and cancel the mandate of paragraph 44 of the Doha Declaration , in effect, means calling into question our raison d'être in this organization and infringing the provisions of the WTO's constitution. Our differences cannot be ignored, just as unfair rules that run counter to the principles that we freely set ourselves cannot be laid down. 13.76. Indeed, we cannot build an organization that benefits some and marginalizes others. Such double standards would be a major threat to our organization. COVID -19 has shown the vulnerability of our economies as well as the need to constr uct a fair and inclusive multilateral system that brings together all Members and creates prosperity for all. Nonetheless, we remain assured that this is neither the goal sought by certain parties nor the essence of their reservations. We therefore invite all parties to examine the G90's proposals with a genuinely open mind , so that we may reach a consensus at MC12. We need greater transparency and predictability just as much as we need to ensure that this organization is more inclusive through precise, eff ective and operational special and differential treatment. The G90's proposals are concrete solutions in this regard. 13.77. The representative of Mauritius provided the following statement: 13.78. I must highlight how pleased I am that we are finally having a conversation. I fully agree with the statements of Nigeria and South Africa. What we find most problematic in this context of special and differential treatment is that , when we made these agreement s so many years ago , we agreed on a package . Very often when we are told we need to implement this particular part of the package, for instance notifications , and not have the same for another part of that package, an essential part of the package, which is special and differential treatment . We cannot be having a conversation 10 years after we conclude an Agreement about how we should be implementing one part of that Agreement. All that does is create a lot of suspicion about whether , in the future , when we conclud e Agreements such as the one on fisheries subsidies, if the special and differential treatment we fight so hard for will have any value or will not be implemented for that purpose. We have a concern about the practice of picking and choosing what one wants to do in an agreement that Members have agreed upon. This been said , I am happy that we can ac tually reach out and start conversations on how to take this forward, perhaps bearing in mind the new realities on the ground. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 102 - 13.79. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 13.80. We welcome the conversation and firmly believe we ne ed such a conversation in the autumn , we need a renewed and fresh discussion on special and differential treatment , on a different basis. Benefits are reaped through the rules, not by being outside of the system. The division between mandated and future is sues is artificial. We need to be honest: the DDA failed - this was an overall package , and we did not succeed. Looking at the ten requests, they include requests for a derogation of provisions from 1947 – for instance on balance of payments – or in relation with TRIMS, which is a clarification of GATT rules. We need a reality check , and a renewed understanding on special and differential treatment. This was a good opportunity for a frank exchange of views. 13.81. The representative of Vanuatu provide d the following statement: 13.82. We should encourage the continuation of this conversation going forward after the summer break because the issue at hand is critical to many developing countries , including Pacific countries. First of all, Vanuatu would like to support the G90 proposal as presented by South Africa and the statements made by the Pacific and ACP Groups on this proposal. Certainly, I think there are many apprehensions about the G90 proposal not being advanced in the current special and differential treatment negotiations in the CTD -SS. We fear whether this will have a spill -over effect on other aspects, as we are currently seeing in the fisheries subsidies negotiations. I f we do not deal with the existing imbalances, the challenges faced by developin g countries in the implementation or when invoking the current flexibilities , then developing countries will find it difficult to engage in new negotiations where special and differential treatment will be discussed . This is the risk of ignoring these conc erns. We note the point made by South Africa that we need to deal with what was presented in the G90 proposal as well as the issue of special and differential treatment going forward . To respond to the E uropean Union's concerns about some of the G90 proposal , policy space is very important , I think this was said in the fisheries subsidies discussions. M any developing countries are late in the ir development process. As such, t hey should not be penalized for asking for policy space because they are in t hat level of development. This has to be taken into account. 13.83. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 13.84. I fully agree with what the D irector -General said about this new ambiance in which dialogue is possible. I think special and differ ential treatment is a fundamental dimension of what we do in the WTO . It is very important and something to be preserved. It is a core concept of this organization. It is so important that it has to be handled carefully. Let me try to handle this carefully . The first thing is about the DDA. I worked in the Doha days as a negotiator of the SSM and I saw how the DDA collapsed . I saw the forces at play when the DDA collapsed . I have a simple question : does anyone think the world is better today without the DDA? Does anyone regret having obstructed the DDA 15 years ago? I would like to hear a mea culp a. I would like to hear these delegation s say: "I am sorry , I should have been more generous and flexible, it would have been better for the developing world". 15 years later , to invoke the DDA , when we play ed against the DDA , I do not think that is fair. Paragraph 44 of the Doha Declaration is very important , but I also want to resuscitate Rev . 3 and Rev . 4. If we want to discus s the DDA seriously , let us bring to the table the concessions and the balance that we achieved in Rev . 3 and Rev . 4, which were not possible to agree on. I am ready to work on that basis ; it was a wonderful package . It was such a good package that it is c ompletely out of our reach now . It was a very ambitious package and it would have hugely benefited the developing world. The DDA goes beyond a negotiation; it is a measure of fairness in the system that is important because the assumption under which we wo rk here is that trade generates prosperity and wealth , but that countries do need time to adapt. That is a measure of fairness. It is a way in which you integrate and generate a community committed to the same systems and beliefs. 13.85. Special and differential treatment was never conceived as a way of shielding yourself from trade , otherwise you do not join the WTO. As we use the special and differential treatment rhetoric to defend the status quo, but the reality in the field is changing. Many are hugely benefiting from special and differential treatment . Look at the list of the major agriculture exporters 20 years ago and look at the list of the major agriculture exporters now. This is clear example of wha t is happening. Take a look at who subsidize d agriculture 20 years ago and who subsidizes agriculture now. That is how special and differential treatment is being used. Is this to the benefit of the poor? Is this to the benefit of the LDCs? I am afraid not . As we reach MC12 it is time for frankness and for generosity. We cannot invoke special and differential treatment in a self -interested way to the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 103 - detriment of those who really need it. This is a very important dimension of what we do , it should be preser ved. The fundamental question is : do we believe that closing our economies will allow us to grow faster? If that is the answer , then there is no hope for the WTO. If that is not the answer , then we should revisit the way we handle those concepts . 13.86. The Director-General provided the following statement: 13.87. I am delighted to see that people are talking to each other , and not reading speeches. This is what we should be doing, engaging on the issues in good spirit. I wanted to thank you for that, and if we could co ntinue this kind of engagement , talking to each other frankly, that is what we need to be able to move. The last comment I want to make on this is to recall something I said during the TNC, let us not head for collective failure, let us not try to link everything to everything and there fore end up getting nothing. I want to invoke a very famous negotiation in the world where people failed to get what they should have gotten, and today they cannot get it, they are very far away from it. If they had taken what they had then, life would hav e been better. 13.88. The representative of Norway provided the following statement: 13.89. We found that the exchange touched upon some of the fundamental issues that we will have to address to enable movement on this file. We would therefore like to express our since re hope that Members can find the opportunity to continue this exchange when we resume our work after the summer break. 13.90. The representative of Jamaica provided the following statement: 13.91. I thank the DG for having triggered a very important and encouraging engagement. I believe, like many other issues, we have been talking across each other because our starting points are different, and the challenges seem unsurmountable. While we do not like the DDA, as I put it under agenda item 5, one of the key elements was our ability to engage and the atmosphere within which to do so. This was a core part of building trust and convergence. I look forward to the assistance of the Director -General as Chair of the Trade Negotiations Committee through convening some session s post -summer break so that can begin to work on the issues and facilitate a greater understanding and find possible paths forward. In this context, those who have proposals, even if they are non -linear approaches, it would be good to bring them all forwar d. 13.92. The representative of Uganda provided the following statement: 13.93. We align ourselves with the intervention made on behalf of the G90. When Uganda joined the WTO in 1995, special and differential treatment represented and still represents a form of relie f from the numerous obligations we undertook by signing onto the WTO agreements , which by far exceeded our capacity to implement them. Under special and differential treatment , we saw and still see opportunities for market access through preferential rates for our exports and protection of our markets through non -reciprocity and meaningful technical assistance. The 2001 Doha ministerial Declaration in paragraph 44 mandates the re view of the special and differential treatment provisions across WTO Agreements with a view to strengthening them and making them more precise, effective and operational. There are two critical questions Members should reflect upon : first, how can we facilitate development as opposed to who should benefit from what some may be willing to allow to enable development and second, whether special and differential treatment has indeed operated to transform economic inequalities into benefits of those for whom it is intended. In considering these fundamental questions, we must not forget that free trade per se does not mean development, neither is it sufficient to ensure development in the absence of or with low levels of industrialization. The achievement of grea t strides in raising standards of living, increasing real income and expanding production and trade , does not also mean the attainment of developed status , thus warranting the removal of flexibilities to allow further progress. The importance of special an d differential treatment is not limited to integrating into the global trading system , but also extends to facilitating the management of the "shocks " in dealing with that new environment , to avoid setbacks. We continue to call upon Members to meaningfully engage and agree on the G90 proposals in the CTD -SS in the spirit of the paragraph 44 Doha mandate. 13.94. The representative of Fiji provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 104 - 13.95. Special and differential treatment remains an integral part of the WTO Agreements and it is important that it is safeguarded and strengthened , with the view to make it more precise, effective and operational in line with paragraph 44 of the D oha Ministerial Declaration. The disproportionate effects of the COVID -19 pandemic on small island economie s like Fiji, and the level of our resilience in view of other forces such as natural disasters and the size of our economies , amongst others , requires a flexibility within the current WTO Agreements and future ones , to safeguard our interests. It is critical that Members take commitments that are commensurate with their level of development , taking into account the differences in our economic capacities. In our view , this submission provides a balanced framework that should assist small island developing states as Fiji to be able to integrate meaningfully into the multilateral trading system , in line with what it can offer to be able to build back better sustainably and to withstand future shocks. We urge Members to e ngage constructively and wholistically in the CTD -SS and in other forums. Technical assistance and capacity building , including transitional period s, do not sufficiently provide the developmental space needed for Fiji, and that Members need to declare the level of flexibilities they need under special and differential treatment . Fiji aligns itself with the ACP Group and the Pacific Group in this G90 declaration. 13.96. The General Council took note of the statements. 14 PAPER TITLED "THE LEGAL STATUS OF 'JOINT STATEM ENT INITIATIVES' AND THEIR NEGOTIATED OUTCOMES" – REQUEST FROM INDIA AND SOUTH AFRICA (WT/GC/W/819) 14.1. The Chair recalled that t his item was on the agenda at the request of the delegations of India and South Africa and relate d to the Paper on "Legal Status of Joint Statement Initiatives and their Negotiated Outcomes", together with the communication in WT/GC/W/819. The item had been first introduced during the March meeting and had also been taken up in May. 14.2. The representative of India provided the following statement: 14.3. The Tokyo Round Plurilateral Codes created a fragmented system of rules. While in respect of some Contracting Parties, the GATT rules were applicable , and in respect of other s, rules of the Plurilateral Codes were applicable. This created considerable complexity in determining which obligations were applicable in respect of which Contracting Party. Recognizing problems created by the fragmented system of trade rules, WTO Members sought an end to this problem. This has been clearly articulated in the following recitals of the Preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement : "[r]esolved, therefore, to develop an integrated, more viable and durable multilateral trading system (…)" and "[d]etermined to preserve the basic principles and to further the objectives underlying this multilateral trading system. " The reference to an integrated multilateral trading system clearly highlights the concerns of WTO Members arising from the fragmentation of the multilateral r ules on account of Tokyo Round Plurilateral Codes. Going back to fragmented agreements would, therefore, be a step in the wrong direction and would be contrary to the determination and resolve enshrined in the Preamble of the Marrakesh Agreement. 14.4. As co-sponsor to this paper, we would also like to reiterate that we are not questioning the right of Members to meet and discuss any issue. What we are saying is that when such discussions turn into negotiatio ns and their outcomes are to be brought into the WTO r ule book, the fundamental rules of the WTO must be followed. Any attempt to introduce new rules, resulting from JSI negotiations, into the WTO without fulfilling the requirements of Articles IX and X of the Marrakesh Agreement , will create a precedent for any group of Members to bring any issue into the WTO without the required consensus , bypass the collective oversight of Members for bringing in any new rules or amendments to existing rules , and usurp limited WTO resources available for multilateral negoti ations. Most importantly, such an approach will undermine the balance in agenda -setting and result in Members disregarding existing multilateral mandates , arrived at through consensus in favour of matters without multilateral mandates, leading to a margina lization or exclusion of issues which are difficult but critical, such as agriculture. In sum, our paper only states that basic fundamental principles and rules, of the rule-based multilateral trading system, as enshrined in the Marrakesh Agreement, should be followed by all Members, including the participants of various JSIs. In fact, our paper also lists out options available to JSI proponents for bringing in their negotiated outcomes in the WTO. 14.5. The representative of Australia provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 105 - 14.6. In the spirit of the frankness with which we are engaging with each other today, I think it is important for a number of us to reflect on what is going on with these important initiatives. We should also be very clear about what i s possible and realistic and what is essential and practical. We need to keep the rule -making function alive. We have all been working, as Brazil eloquently pointed out earlier, in a variety of multilateral, single undertaking, all -in kind of exercise. Tha t has not enabled rulemaking to advance. It is important that we reflect on what is practical and what has been a tradition in this house for a very long time. Plurilateral initiatives can and must drive rulemaking and be part of strengthening the WTO's ar chitecture, strengthening the rulemaking function, modernizing the rulebook, and trying to assist with the task that this last conversation on the role of trade in development has just emphasized and is so important to this house. 14.7. In reacting to that pape r, I will just simply make a couple of points. First, there is clearly a need for the continuing drive in the rulemaking function, starting with the plurilaterals. It does not mean that we end there, but it is absolutely the way we have always driven rulem aking in this house. It is also important that it continues, as long as they are open, inclusive, and transparent. With respect to a number of the joint statement initiatives that are under way, that is precisely the mode in which they are being pursued. O n the legal arguments, we do not agree with the arguments that consensus is required to launch plurilateral initiatives. In fact, as one potential possible legal pathway to collectively improve the commitments in Members' schedules, consensus is not requir ed to do that either. We are open to talk about these issues. We have done precisely that through the various discussions we held in our joint statement initiative meetings, for instance on e -commerce. We are very open to others contributing to those discu ssions. Just as recently as a month ago, as current chair of the MIKTA group, we were happy to host a panel on these issues that drew on expertise from all the MIKTA countries: Mexico, Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Indonesia and Australia. It included all of the perspectives on this issue. I would encourage those who have not seen the webinar to do it as it is public available. We encourage all Members to participate in this thinking and all the plurilateral initiatives and absolutely to keep an open mind o n them. 14.8. The representative of Nigeria provided the following statement: 14.9. We to refer to our statement on this issue delivered at the last G eneral Council meeting and reiterate that we do not agree with the assertion that JSIs are likely to undermine the Multilateral Trading System. Plurilateral arrangements have always been critical building blocks of the MTS , even during the GATT era. We also believe that the vie ws expressed in the paper regarding the likely implication of introducing new JSI rules into the WTO due to perceived inconsistencies , are premature. We believe the JSIs are of critical importance if the WTO is to be responsive to the economic realities of the 21st century. We therefore call on Members , especially developing countries who are not participating in the JSIs discussions , to join us so we can collectively shape the discussions and deliver a development -friendly outcome. 14.10. The representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement: 14.11. My delegation believes that the issue of legality of joint initiatives and their consistency with the WTO system is unquestionable. We strongly disagree with the view that JSIs undermine the multilate ral character of the WTO , that is in need of saving. On the contrary, by turning a blind eye to the current inert rules -making situation we are simply creating more risks. Conservation of problems will neither lead to their solution, nor increase the efficiency of the organization. Russia participates in JSIs with the aim to create new rules that meet the current needs and challenges of the global trading system in the 21st century, while respecting the multilateral principles of the organization. When ther e are areas in which many WTO Members are ready and willing to work, and the "benefits" of this work are to be applied on MFN terms, we consider it unfair to deprive those Members of the right to conduct such work. 14.12. The representative of Costa Rica provide d the following statement: 14.13. I would like to focus my remarks on the negotiations on Services Domestic Regulation, as this is the initiative that I have the pleasure of coordinating. JSI participants have carefully considered the concerns expressed by India and South Africa, but disagree with the legal interpretations of these Members. I do not wish to repeat the legal arguments advan ced earlier as to why these negotiations, and the outcome they will produce, are firmly within the agreed framework of rules of the WTO. Let me just say that the group considers that there are no provisions WT/GC/M/19 2 - 106 - in the WTO Agreement that require consensus for a group of Members to launch negotiations on topics of interest, such as Services Domestic Regulation. There is also no provision in the WTO Agreement or the GATS that requires consensus for a Member to introduce improvements to its Schedule of Specific Commitments under the GATS. And finally, Article XVIII of the GATS provides unambiguously that Members are entitled to incorporate commitments within the scope of this Article into their GATS Schedules. 14.14. At the May meeting of the General Council and today, it was alleged that the WTO Agreement sought to end the earlier practice of Plurilateral Agreements under the Tokyo Round Codes, and it was cautioned that going back to Plurilateral Agreements would be a step in the wrong direction. Let me say again that as far as the Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation is concerned, participants are not aiming to create a new plurilateral agreement. Rather, they are using the multilaterally designed flexibility that the GATS provides for Members to take on diffe rent levels of specific commitments, with regard to different sectors and measures, and within the context of existing rules. Another argument that has been made is that the matters addressed by the Initiative fall under Part II of the GATS (General Obligations and Disciplines), which would prevent that they could be scheduled under Part III (Specific Commitments). It is not clear what the legal basis for this claim is, because Article XVIII - which is in Part III - refers explicitly to the same matters tha n Article VI:4 – licensing, qualifications and technical standards. Let me also note that this claim is also not borne out by the scheduling practice of more than 100 WTO Members whose additional commitments typically address matters for which baseline pro visions already exist in Part II of the GATS. Mr Chairman, India and South Africa are expressing concern that the negotiations under the JSI would undermine the Article VI:4 mandate. Let me recall that these same delegations asserted at the time of the W orking Programme on Domestic Regulation negotiations in 2017 that the proposals on which the current disciplines negotiated in the JSI are based, were not falling under the Article VI:4 mandate because they addressed issues for which multilateral disciplines were not "necessary", or covered issues that were outside the scope of the mandate, such as "transparency" and "authorizations". This latter point on authorizations was repeated just recently, at the Working Programme on Domestic Regulation meeting on 30 June. This argumentation exhibits a high degree of intellectual flexibility: I certainly am not able to reconcile how disciplines that could not be negotiated in the Working Programme on Domestic Regulation because they were outside the Article VI:4 mandat e, can now undermine or dilute the same mandate. 14.15. The high level of commitment to these negotiations by services trading Members is testament to the importance of this negotiation. Above all, as we all know, enhancing transparency and predictability of regulatory frameworks to harness the potential of services trade is a crucial element of the post -COVID economic recovery. The positive economic effects of an outcome will spread to all WTO Members, as services suppliers from all Members – including non -participants - will benefit from the reduced trade costs that the negotiations will bring about. Nonetheless, for JSI participants it is evident that the greatest benefits will come from each Member implementing the disciplines at home, the reby benefitting particularly their own small and medium sized services suppliers. The Initiative remains open and transparent, and all Members are welcome to join the meetings and constructively engage with the participants to ensure that the outcome bene fits service suppliers across the world and includes as many Members as possible. 14.16. The representative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 14.17. Regarding the tabled communication in document WT/GC/W/819/Rev .1, we would like to once again echo our views shared in previous General Council meetings, that Joint Statement Initiatives (JSIs) are products of lack of consensus among members, of which some members decide to pursue in their own configuration outside WTO framework. In our view the outcomes to be achieved under JSI s, will remain binding only to the participating Members. However, the United Republic of Tanzania has no intention to object other Members pursuing their interest through JSIs configurations. Nevertheless, it is critical to ensure negotiations under JSI arrangements abide to the WTO agreed procedures. Therefore, as a matter of principle, the General Council should clarify the nuances e merging from JSI configurations or they should follow the process of Article X (9) of the Marrakesh Agreement, in order to attain the legal status as WTO Plurilateral Agreements. 14.18. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the followi ng statement: 14.19. The LDC Group has taken note of the request made by India and South Africa. We welcome the informal meeting organized by the co -authors of Joint Statement Initiatives and we have noted WT/GC/M/19 2 - 107 - that some of our Members have been attending or participa ting in these initiatives. We call on the General Council to share responses to the questions which have been raised as well as the path moving forward. The LDC Group wishes to reaffirm that all WTO negotiations need to adopt an effective and flexible appr oach, perhaps through the General Council. Particularly with regard to the fundamental principles of our organization which lay the groundwork for our commitments, these include the principles of consensus -based decision making, inclusivity, non -discrimina tion and special and differentiated treatment for LDCs and developing countries with capacity constraints. We took note that Australia pointed out the importance of looking at what is practical, realistic and pragmatic to achieve consensus -based outcomes. We share their point of view, but we would like to add that we must pay attention to one fact. We cannot claim that we are being realistic but not actually respond to the needs and expectations of Members , especially the most vulnerable Members. 14.20. The repres entative of Nepal provided the following statement: 14.21. Our efforts and contributions should be towards safeguarding multilateralism and facilitating rules-based, predictable, transparent, and inclusive trade with a view to achieving broad objectives of the Marrakesh Agreement. My delegation respects the consen sus-based decision -making and consultation, discussion, and dialogues to achieve the WTO objectives. Any initiative of multilateral negotiation needs to bring all Members on board irrespective of the size of their economy and volume of trade. The n umber of members outside the JSIs and the size of population they cover are also equally important and really matters. Furthermore, attending discussions on these JSIs occasionally without officially joining JSIs should not be taken as support from such Members. T herefore, Nepal is in favour of the paper and supports its essence, as it is consistent with the promotion and protection of the provision s and spirit of the Marrakesh Agreement. Finally, concluding mandated negotiations at the maximum possible level throu gh the upcoming Ministerial Conference should continue to remain our focus. 14.22. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 14.23. At previous General Council meetings where this submission was discussed, it was clear that a very larg e number of WTO Members are involved in plurilateral negotiations under the Joint Statement Initiatives and support such approaches, which can bring real benefits and ensure that the WTO continues to engage in matters of importance to its Members relevant to today’s trade challenges. For the sake of time, I will not reiterate the many arguments in favour of plurilaterals – nor the legal basis for plurilaterals within the WTO framework - but simply stress that maintaining the option of developing rules that respond to current economic and trade realities through plurilateral agreements is absolutely vital for the WTO’s relevance and credibility. Rejecting this option would condemn the WTO to irrelevance. We cannot stress this enough. 14.24. We also believe we should avoid having too legalistic a debate in this setting on the legal claims of this submission, many of which are simply not valid in our view, as we have pointed out in previous General Council meetings or in the Working Party on Domestic Regulation ( when it comes to the specific claims made against the Joint Statement Initiative on services domestic regulation). Just to point to two elements: First, nowhere in the WTO rulebook does it say that Members need a consensus to start exploratory talks and in deed negotiations on issues of shared interest, as the submission seems to suggest. The WTO rulebook provides for a number of options to give outcomes negotiated in such context legal effect, such as through scheduling of additional commitments in the individual Members ' schedules. Secondly, the GATS in its Article XIX:4 specifically refers to the progressive liberalisation to be advanced through bilateral, plurilateral or multilateral negotiations. Therefore, there is nothing inconsistent with the GATS. We are however, in favour of discussing this issue further with Members in a constructive and coordinated manner. As part of future work on how to improve the functioning of the WTO, we would favour having discussions on the relationship between the WTO arch itecture and plurilateral agreements. The European Union favours an inclusive approach to open, plurilateral agreements that facilitates participation by developing countries and allows them to decide whether they wish to join the agreement, leaving the do or open for them to join in the future if they so wish. We hope that many Members will support our approach. We encourage more Members to join the ongoing Joint Statement Initiative negotiations, which provide an essential tool to moderni ze the WTO ruleboo k. 14.25. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 108 - 14.26. What strikes me is the importance of the Joint Initiatives to the credibility of the WTO. If we were to lose the J SIs then we would be all the poorer. We support the comments made by the European Union and recall our statements in previous meetings. The U nited Kingdom is a strong supporter of the Joint Initiatives, which have brought much needed energy and dynamism to the WTO. These plurilateral negotiations are enabli ng a significant proportion of the membership to make much needed progress on key areas, where new rules are urgently needed to demonstrate the organizations credibility in the 21st century global economy, in a way that is open and inclusive. 14.27. The representative of Turkey provided the following statement: 14.28. We believe that this issue is crucial, not only for the future of the ongoing JSIs but also for the WTO as a whole. We all know for a fact that the ideal way for a rules -based system, concerning new and emerging issues , is through the multilateral decision -making. But, in order not to fall behind these improvements, the WTO needs additional instruments and different configurations to engage in negotiations among Members. Moreover, this is not a nov elty. We should not forget that the negotiations around certain topics have evolved differently and under diverse configurations throughout the negotiating history of this organization. With this respect, Turkey believes that discussions under JSIs, contri bute to the main objective of the WTO, as long as they continue to maintain their transparent and inclusive character and adhere to the fundamental principles of this organization. We are ready to engage in further discussions on how these agreements can b e integrated into the WTO acquis. 14.29. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 14.30. We believe the JSIs will contribute to updating the WTO rulebooks and to ensuring the relevance of the WTO in the world today. Without the JSIs, the WTO risks becoming less relevant and even losing its raison d’être as a cornerstone of the multilateral trading system (MTS). We should recall that a number of achievements made in the GATT or the WTO were initially taken up or discussed in the plurilateral initiat ives and they are later merged in this system. We believe the JSIs are legitimate and consistent with the WTO. The JSI meetings are organized in an open, transparent and inclusive manner. While we need to take account of the convenience of respective Membe rs, including the size of the delegations , to organize the process, the fact that many WTO Members are participating in the JSIs and actively engaging in negotiations in a creative and innovative way clearly shows its importance and relevance. We have high hopes that, with more Members ' participation, JSIs will achieve concrete outcomes at the time of MC12 and beyond. Japan will continue to work with other Members to deliver substantial outcomes in the JSIs. 14.31. The representative of Chile provided the following statement: 14.32. This morning's discussion on the previous item highlighted the importance of dialogue for gaining a better understanding of each another, avoiding suspicion and hearing what is actually being proposed. This is the only wa y for us to build trust. The discussion on this item must follow such an approach if we wish to make progress. We want to have a constructive and positive conversation. As we said from the first day on which this paper was presented, the proponents are raising an important topic that must be discussed. However, it must be discussed with a view to seeking solutions, rather than rejecting them. Such dialogue cannot be based on unsubstantiated assertions. In this regard, there is no provision requiring consens us in order for a group of Members to initiate negotiations. All of the joint initiatives are fully consistent with the WTO legal framework. It is also incorrect that authorization from the rest of the Members or consensus is required if a Member wishes to make improvements to its GATT or GATS Schedules as a result of the agreements reached in plurilateral initiatives. Two thirds of Members participate in at least one initiative. We cannot all be in the wrong. 14.33. The Joint Statement Initiatives are open, tran sparent and inclusive processes that respect the decision and rights of those Members that prefer not to join them. They are also a legitimate way of addressing many of the challenges presented by 21st century trade. Our alternative was multilateral negoti ations, which, while certainly preferred, do not work. It is vital to acknowledge this, rather than bury one's head in the sand. Seeking to deny Members the right to continue along this path with unsubstantiated arguments does not help us move forward. The way to incorporate the outcomes of the Joint Initiative negotiations must be decided within each initiative when the negotiations reach sufficient maturity, as has been the case of Domestic Regulation in Services, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 109 - which was correctly explained by the coor dinator of this initiative, Jaime Coghi. In the short term, pragmatic solutions under the current WTO framework will be required for each joint initiative, and, in the long term, discussions for a permanent solution as part of the reform of the WTO will al so be needed. Lastly, as regards the Joint Initiative on Investment Facilitation for Development, I would like to recall that a first dedicated academic session was held at the end of May, which proved to be very useful to begin to explore the various lega l architecture options for a future agreement. During the second half of the year, we will hold a conceptual discussion among participants, to which all WTO Members will certainly be invited. 14.34. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 14.35. Like many others, Korea is a strong believer in the legitimacy and usefulness of JSIs in the legal framework of the WTO. Under the current circumstances in the WTO, these initiatives, which are open to all Members, repre sent the most viable, practical path for updating the WTO rulebook in order for the WTO to remain relevant to the priorities of today. At the same time, my delegation thanks India, Namibia and South Africa for raising the issue of how negotiated JSI outcom es could be incorporated into the WTO legal architecture. It seems that a variety of possible procedures could be envisaged indeed. This is why we have been supporting and encouraging efforts to explore options to this end. Such discussions have already ta ken place in the E -Commerce and Investment Facilitation JSIs and also in other fora such as the panel organized by MIKTA last month, as Ambassador Mina of Australia said this morning. Korea will continue to take part in advancing these discussions. Obvious ly, the procedures of incorporating plurilaterally negotiated outcomes are predicated, to varying degrees depending on the areas concerned, on cooperation with non -JSI Members. It is our hope that participation in the JSIs would be as broad and inclusive a s possible. It is the expectation of my delegation that at the end of the day, all Members will be supportive of the integration into the WTO rulebooks of the outcomes that are being negotiated in earnest by more than three quarters of its membership, incl uding small vulnerable economies and LDCs. 14.36. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 14.37. The United States believes that plurilateral negotiations at the WTO can be a useful means to advance issues of interest to Members and to keep the WTO relevant. The various rigid positions expressed in this paper would seem to foreclose Members ' ability to pursue creative and flexible approaches at the WTO to the challenges of today and tomorrow. We do not view plurilateral negotiations and outcomes as undermining multilateral ones. In fact, plurilateral initiatives can foster new ideas and approaches and build momentum toward multilateral outcomes. Just last week, the United States announced our intention to join the WTO Joint Statement Ini tiative on Services Domestic Regulation, and support conclusion of this initiative by MC12. We recognize the negotiations as an opportunity to improve the transparency and fairness of processes for obtaining licenses to provide services, for ours and other Members ' service providers. The United States has long championed transparency and fairness of regulatory rules as a fundamental feature of good governance, and we view this JSI as an opportunity to strengthen such standards around the globe. 14.38. The represen tative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 14.39. We are of the view that the voluntary, open, transparent and inclusive nature of plurilateral approach of JSIs is a practical approach to update the WTO rules and to make the WTO a living organiza tion, without affecting non -participating Members' right and obligations. The voluntariness actually gives the non -participating Members a carve -out or a special and different treatment in their favour . The issues being negotiated make the WTO rules more i n response to what are happening in the real world. The Service s Domestic Regulation JSI is to improve the market access commitment of the participating Members; the E -commerce JSI is to respond to the already prevalent digital trade at the minimal level; and the Investment Facilitation for Development JSI is to help Members to streamline their own investment procedures. They do not pose threat of any kind to non - partic ipating WTO Members. Instead, these JSIs benefit all Members, including the non -participating Members. 14.40. If a plurilateral approach is not allowed at this stage, Members might have to wait for another quarter of century or even a longer time before the WTO rules can respond to the rapid development in the real world. Also, if the plurilateral approach is effectively excluded from the WTO, it is actually forcing Members to conduct the negotiations outside of the WTO. This is actually undermining the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 110 - WTO. Ther e are pathways to integrate the results of the JSIs into the multilateral trading system to take into account the respective development stages and still maintain the existing rights and obligations of Members. We urge Members to discuss a workable way for ward, taking into account the respective development stages and maintaining the existing rights and obligations of Members. 14.41. The representative of Norway provided the following statement: 14.42. We agree that seeking multilateral outcomes should always be our firs t priority. Initiatives by individual Members and groups of Members have, however, been a natural part of the development of the multilateral, rules -based trading system. There is nothing that impedes Members from working on and negotiate new rules in the WTO. The Joint Statement Initiatives respond to Members ' ambitions to update our rule book by addressing issues of relevance in the 21st century. The current initiatives cover a variety of issues, and the format of the negotiated outcomes will be diverse, also in its legal architecture , and cannot therefore be predefined or prejudged. We are, however, of the opinion that a broader discussion on how we can more effectively make sure that plurilateral agreements are integrated into the multilateral system in the WTO, would benefit our work moving forward. This cou ld therefore be an element of the WTO reform discussion. 14.43. The representative of Brazil provided the following statement: 14.44. Brazil believes that the WTO is in dire need of reform. This should come as a surprise to no one. In this regard, we need to use all of the tools and procedures at our disposal to advance in pressing issues. This includes plurilateral processes, which — in turn — leads us to the consensus rule. We recognize that Members may want to move at different speeds on certain issues. This, however , cannot serve as a pretext to prevent other Members to advance negotiations on important and pressing issues of contemporary trade. As Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro stated - "the consensus rule cannot be transformed into a veto or an instrument of pe rpetual inaction". The same logic holds for the WTO. The consensus rule cannot be used as a tool to halt or to veto negotiations by those who do not want to move the multilateral trading system forward. 14.45. The representative of Singapore provided the followin g statement: 14.46. First, we do not agree with the analysis in India's and South Africa's paper on the legal status of JSIs and their outcomes. Plurilateral initiatives are not new or unusual, in fact they have always been part of the multilateral trading system and plurilat eral negotiations have facilitated plenty of rulemaking in the WTO's history. An example is the Information Technology Agreement which India is a party to. The JSIs continue in this tradition, the consensus decision by the Ministerial Conference is not req uired to launch plurilateral negotiations under existing agreements. Second, we have valuable/variable options for JSI outcomes to be legitimately integrated into the WTO framework, for example, the participants of the JSI on Services D omestic Regulations have agreed to capture their outcomes as improvements to their GATS Schedules. For the other JSIs, including the one on e-commerce, participants are still discussing the options. The choice will depend on the substance of the commitments eventually agreed upon. In this regard, we should not prematurely frustrate efforts in trade liberalization, the modernization of trade rules or the removal of trade barriers. That would be contrary to the WTO's raison d'être. Third, we should recall D r Ngozi's call last we ek to operate with the end objective, which is to engage, negotiate and deliver. I am heartened that the large majority of WTO Members participate in at least one JSI. This shows that the JSIs are open, transparent and inclusive and more importantly, most WTO Members are aligned to the objective of delivering meaningful quality outcomes for the people we serve. As one of the co -conveners of the JSI on E-commerce with Australia and Japan, we hope that Members who have yet to join the JSIs will consider comin g on board and collaborate with other Members to advance the goals of the WTO. In conclusion, we must keep up the momentum on our JSI negotiations and not allow divisive debates to slow ourselves, as responsible WTO Members, we have to move forward constru ctively to bridge our differences and work together to strengthen the WTO. 14.47. The representative of New Zealand provided the following statement: 14.48. New Zealand is pleased to participate in the JSI processes launched by Ministers in Buenos Aires. We note that t he various JSIs are aiming for different outcomes, tailored to the nature and substance of the topic under discussion, and bring together participants representing both developed and developing Members, a range of regions, and different sized economies. Ne w Zealand supports WT/GC/M/19 2 - 111 - the JSIs aiming for a pathway to multilateralization over time. Accordingly, in all cases, N ew Zealand supports participation being open to all WTO Members, and is willing to discuss how to broaden current participation in each context. We are pleased that these conversations have taken and continue to take place. We are aware that full participation may not be possible at the outset, for a range of reasons, but it should not prevent groups of Members from moving ahead, nor preclude Membe rs from joining the JSIs at a later date. It is New Zealand 's expectation and experience that JSIs operate transparent, open and inclusive approaches to negotiations, ensuring the widest participation possible. This includes practical steps like ensuring a ccess to meetings and papers. We continue to invite all Members to consider joining the range of JSIs taking place. 14.49. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 14.50. This paper has raises pertinent questions on an element which is of a fundamental nature for this organization. Notwithstanding the content or topic of any of the JSI 's, potentially, they pose a serious challenge to the consensus -based decision -making principle of the multilateral system. We recognize that some Members wish to advance certain discussions. At the same time, a large number of other Members consider some of the subjects as unrelated or premature for negotiations, and also wish to address other issues such as those pending for decades. However, consensus lies at the core of this multilateral institution. It means taking everyone along, regardless of their background. This has been a hallmark of multilateralism in this organization and has differentiated it from other institutions. Compromising this principle wi ll strike at the very heart of what we stand for. Or, as pointed out by some others , we reach some common understanding going forward. But just on one point being made a number of times here, that the present JSIs under discussion reiterate that they are open, transparent and inclusive. This per se is no qualification, since every activity at the WTO is by definition supposed to be open, transparent and inclusive. However, moving without consensus does not qualify as inclusivity. Negotiating an agreement th at others do not wish to engage in, without a consensual mandate , does not qualify as openness. For non -multilateral negotiations, developing and smaller countries will be at a loss in terms of negotiating coalitions and defending their interests. We, ther efore, see the questions posed in this paper as pertinent and look forward to discussing this aspect, particularly with reference to upholding the fundamental pillars of this system. 14.51. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 14.52. As stated in previous General Council meetings, Switzerland does not share the views expressed in the document presented . Plurilaterals are an integral part of the WTO and its predecessor GATT system. We reiterate that initiatives emanating from joint declarat ions are an appropriate instrument to develop the trading system and strengthen the negotiating function of the WTO, thus enabling the organi zation to meet the challenges of the contemporary economy. Let me conclude by stressing that Joint Statement Initiatives do not affect the obligations of non - participating Members, and in many cases these initiatives will extend the latter's new rights under the MFN clause. 14.53. The representative of Indonesia provided the following statement: 14.54. Indonesia holds that the ambition and urge to generate a particular discipline within the WTO must be in line with the rules agreed by all of us at the very beginning of this organization. As an organization based on a rules -based system , failure to follow these rules will not onl y jeopardize the legitimacy of the agreed rules but also the organization as a whole. Therefore, Indonesia is looking for ward to the discussion on how the JSI s will be integrated into the WTO system , to give the same level of comfort for all Members who ar e engaged as well as who are not engaged in the negotiations. 14.55. The representative of Thailand provided the following statement: 14.56. We believe that a plurilateral discussion would be a good way to address current issues in the global economy. Without the abili ty or flexibility to hold a plurilateral discussion, the WTO will be stuck with all of the traditional issues that have been ongoing for the past 20 years. It is one good way to keep the WTO relevant in the future, which will greatly benefit especially dev eloping countries and LDCs. Therefore, we would like to invite Members to share views and thoughts and not be confined by theoretical issues about the format of discussion. We believe that a plurilateral WT/GC/M/19 2 - 112 - discussion is always a good option for the WTO to pr oceed. For Thailand, we are not participating in all JSIs, but we chose to fully participate in two JSIs and observe others, in which we benefit from hearing the views of Members. While we recognize the limitations of small delegations, we should look at the JSIs discussion in a favo urable manner and try to be a part of it as much as we can. Thailand also supports the legal interpretation of the E uropean Union on this matter. 14.57. The representative of Hong Kong, China provided the following statement: 14.58. At the General Council meetings held in March and May, Hong Kong, China already expressed our views on the issues raised in the communication on the legal status of JSIs. We would just reiterate our view that these JSIs will help moderni ze and strengthen the mul tilateral trading system and demonstrate that the WTO is capable of handling new trade topics in response to the latest developments in the global trading environment. Since the General Council meeting in March, several seminars and discussions focussing o n the issues of JSIs' legal structure have been organi zed by Members and the WTO Secretariat to facilitate informed discussions with experts, academics and experienced diplomats in the relevant areas. I would like to share with Members briefly some of the key points highlighted at these discussions. First, plurilateral discussions have all along been a part of the WTO framework. Second, multiple pathways exist for incorporating these initiatives into the WTO framework. Third, some of these pathways require consensus of the whole membership, whereas others rely on the prerogative of individual Members to improve their commitments unilaterally under the relevant WTO agreements. All of these pathways are consistent with the WTO framework. We therefore cannot ag ree with the proponents of this agenda item that the outcome of the JSIs would diminish or affect the existing rights and obligations of Members under the WTO Agreements, including those of non -participants of the JSIs. Hong Kong, China continues to encour age all interested Members to join the discussions on the JSIs so that their views could be taken into account fully and accurately. 14.59. The representative of Israel provided the following statement: 14.60. In light of the discussion that has been developed, and since this is an important issue for us, we wish to place our position on record. Israel has always been a strong supporter of the multilateral trading system. As an open and relatively small economy, Israel tries to further develop its inte rnational trade and economic collaboration with countries around the world on the basis of the multilateral trading system and the WTO rules. Therefore, we recognize the importance of supporting a well -functioning WTO, including taking up negotiations with in its rules -based framework. We note, however, that WTO Members have not managed in recent years, except in a few cases, to achieve the negotiated outcomes expected by the ever -changing international trade landscape. The plurilateral route has been able t o partially fill in some of the gaps and complement it. Of course, plurilateral agreements or JSIs should not replace multilateral negotiations. We prefer the latter, but plurilaterals do offer a complementary route that can deliver tangible results in new areas. Israel will continue to participate in all multilateral trade negotiations and similarly in plurilateral negotiations in which it has specific trade interests. We see both routes as viable and complementary of the rulemaking function of the WTO. 14.61. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement: 14.62. There was a seminar where this was discussed in detail and various experts on legal issues and WTO architecture were invited to speak. It was clear that we can find common ground on JSIs. The sem inar is available online and I think it might be relevant for interested parties to take a look at it. Mexico has already spoken on this topic in the past and I don’t want to repeat our prior comments , namely that we are in favour of JSIs and them being pa rt of the WTO architecture. I would like to point out that negotiations on these initiatives are moving forward and they will help to underscore the relevance of this organization, they will help to improve the business environment worldwide and lead to mo re jobs and investment. The E-commerce JSI is trying to put in place rules for an industry that has been swiftly growing faster than regulations - if the WTO does not regulate this, somebody else will , and that is what happening in bilateral and regional negotiations. In light of this, wrapping up these negotiations would again reaffirm this organization's relevance. I also welcome this discussion but would like to point out the following, we can't get wrapped up in legal arguments, we need to foc us on the relevance of the organization and strengthening international trade, I think all Members participating in these negotiations would never want to hamper anyone who has decided not to participate in this round of negotiations. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 113 - 14.63. The representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement: 14.64. The JSI proponents believe that JSIs seem to be the most feasible way forward to circumvent the existing negotiating deadlock at the WTO. But the proponents are trying to implement the outcomes of negotiations through modifications of schedules , which is limited to the legal scope of those schedules , that is tariff concessions for the GATT and sector specific commitment on services in the GATS. That mechanism does not allow the further adoption of general rules in schedules. General rules belong to the appropriate part in the text of the relevant agreement and subject to the process for amendment set out in the Marrakesh Agreement. We also note that the proponents have two preferred options to introduce JSIs in t he current WTO system, that is again a division among developing and developed countries. Developing countries believe that it may be through regional trade agreements, and developed countries believe it should be through an amendment of the Member 's sched ule, most likely to be in the area of services preferred by developed countries. These divisions and difference s in opinion demonstrate that there are a lot of systemic issues that are to be addressed by the proponents. When we look carefully at the propos als before them going beyond the modifications of existing schedules. Similarly, there are many legal flaws that have been flagged in the joint proposal by India and South Africa. We therefore request the proponents to seriously study the concerns expresse d therein and initiate a process to genuinely engage with other Members . 14.65. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement: 14.66. The Philippines is a willing and active participant in most JSIs. We believe that the JSIs are a hugely positive contribution to the multilateral trading system even if their pursuit, and their eventual implementation, is not shared universally by the membership. For us, and many other Members, JSIs serve to deepen tra de relations among us, they serve to clarify rules that bind us more strongly, and more importantly, they respond to the policy exigencies of modern -day global trade, such as our advocacy on the importance of integrating MSMEs into the global trading syste m. 14.67. The provisions of the Marrakesh Agreement are, indeed, clear and undisputable. I believe no one questions Article X of Marrakesh. We understand the institutional and legal questions raised in WT/GC/W/819 and they are not the same questions for each of t he JSIs, as the legal questions and issues may vary in relevance and importance, depending on the level and nature of commitments being envisioned in the particular JSI discussions being conducted. 14.68. For this reason, we ask the proponents to engage in a dialogue with JSI participants to address the institutional and legal issues in such a way as would permit the laudable objectives and outcomes envisioned in the Member -driven initiatives to produce results that will benefit the global economy and the whole WT O membership in accordance with the preamble and the covered agreements and texts of the Marrakesh agreement. 14.69. The representative of Viet Nam provided the following statement: 14.70. JSIs have provided additional dynamism to the discussions for rulemaking at the W TO. We share the view that the legal status of the JSIs in the WTO system should be explored as much as possible to give some level of control to the membership and to share their considerations on the legal pathway to incorporate the respective JSI into t he multilateral system. We also suggest considering the implications of JSI discussions , including various aspects of the organization and operation of the WTO , such as on existing negotiation mandates and resource constraints of the WTO Secretariat and of WTO Members , especially developing and least developed countries. 14.71. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement: 14.72. My delegation supports and has been participating in most JSIs, we believe that we can make progress on topics of interest to many Members in various formats although we do prefer multilateral options. We like to see this opportunity to avoid the narratives that these initiatives are debated between developed and developing countries as noted by Chile's Ambassador, al most two thirds of Members are participating in at least one of these initiatives. Continuing to argue that some developing Members and other developed Members have been participating in these debates on unequal footing would imply that we are questioning the development of Members. As a result of this I would suggest that we avoid such narratives. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 114 - 14.73. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 14.74. We recall our previous statements made in this regard. We wish to emphasize that the WTO was established as the forum governing multilateral trade relations. Our fundamental interest in submitting this paper is thus aimed at reminding ourselves of the legal architecture that governs the functioning of the WTO and to highlight the systemic impo rtance of preserving its multilateral character, including the underpinning principles that should inform the incorporation of new rules in the WTO legal framework. We note with concern that the organi zation is now hovering towards becoming a two -tiered institution ignoring the commitments and payment extracted from developing and least developed countries during the Uruguay Round. Yet today the issues of importance to developing countries remain outstan ding. These are issues which are critical to an inclusive agenda that is capable of addressing the core needs of its poorest Members and thereby contributing to the achievement of the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. 14.75. JSIs do introduce new systemic and developmental challenges that the membership must reflect on the implications for decision -making in the WTO and what the impact is on the core principles of the WTO. Of concern are implications for existing multilateral mandates arrived at through consen sus in favour of matters without multilateral mandates , including the marginalisation of issues which are difficult but yet critical for the multilateral trading system, such as agriculture and development, thereby undermining balance in agenda setting, ne gotiating processes and outcomes. There is a difference between sectoral negotiations that change schedules v ersus rules. A procedure for amending rules is enshrined in Article X of the Marrakesh Agreement. On the other hand, the GATT and GATS contain spec ific provisions for modifications of Schedules. It is therefore important to respect this difference. We want to emphasise that there is a difference between item 13 and 14 - one is a mandated issue and the other one is not. Under item 13 we are asking for implementation of an issue with an agreed Ministerial mandate. We agree with Korea and Philippines that each of the recent JSIs is likely to pose different legal challenges to existing WTO rules and mandates, given the differences in the nature and scope of issues covered under each of these initiatives and we raise this point in our submission. The question the Members need to ask themselves is: can any group of Members come up with an idea and bring it into the WTO under a JSI and what does that mean for the multilateral character of the WTO? Will this not fragment the multilateral trading system ? What lessons can be drawn from the GATT and the predictability of rules when you have different rules applying to different Members? How and whether Members can bring new rules not agreed by consensus into the WTO without following the processes and provisions entailed in the Marrakesh Agreement? What are the implications of JSIs in addressing issues that have a multilateral mandate, thus subverting the multilate ral directives? What does this mean for the membership and the Secretariat? 14.76. We would like to reiterate that we do not question the right for any group of Members to discuss any issue informally, but where such discussions turn into negotiations, and their outcomes are sought to be formalized into the WTO framework, this can only be done in accordance with the rules set out in the Marrakesh Agreement. We have adopted a constructive posture by outlining in the Paper the options that Members can consider in bringing new rules into the WTO , which must be preserved. In addition, it is not about the number of Members that participate in a specific initiative , but our paper is about the legal provisions that underpin the functioning of the WTO that must be respected. It is about raising pertinent issues that the membership must grapple with. The legal questions are important in a rules-based system and we encourage the membership to engage on these legal and systemic questions as they stand to create i ssues going forward. It is good to hear that the JSIs are also looking at the issues of the legal architecture and we believe that we need to deepen the multilateral discussion on these issues is not only timely but important as others have said. 14.77. The repre sentative of Argentina provided the following statement: 14.78. Argentina is constructively engaged in the structured dialogues on various topics that represent certain challenges to modernizing WTO rules, such as the Joint Initiatives on Electronic Commerce, th e Integration of SMEs into International Trade, Investment Facilitation, and Services Domestic Regulation. However, Argentina considers that the methodology of structured dialogues cannot become a systematic negotiating practice in the multilateral trading system. Plurilateral discussions should be the exception rather than the rule. Argentina advocates a multilateral system based on a broad, transparent and inclusive discussion with the consensus of all WTO members. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 115 - 14.79. The representative of Colombia provided the following statement: 14.80. We would like to reiterate our support for and commitment to the discussions that are taking place in the various Joint Initiatives on E-commerce, Investment Facilitation for Development, Services Domestic Regulation and MSMEs. Our position on the discussion paper is well known, and we would simply like to reiterate our statement made under the same agenda item at the previous regular session of 1 -2 March 2021. 14.81. The representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statement: 14.82. We thank the proponents for their proposal in highlighting the correlation between plurilateral and Multilateral agreements within the WTO system. At the same time, we would like to underline the importan ce of the various JSIs that address important issues for developed and developing countries that are of interest to their economies, including, E -commerce, Investment Facilitation, Micro, Small and Medium -Sized Enterprises as well as Services Domestic Regu lation. We hope to achieve concrete outcomes in these areas by MC12 that would not undermine our multilateral mandate. Finally, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia stands ready to work constructively with WTO Members towards achieving meaningful outcomes in these areas at MC12. 14.83. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: 14.84. My delegation aligns with the statement of Chad on behalf of the LDCs and also thanks India and South Africa for this submission (WT/GC/W/819/R ev.1). Bangladesh is a strong supporter of multilateralism and is of the view that multilateralism should be the main principle of the WTO. The questions and concerns raised in the communication are important and demand deeper discussion involving all WTO Members. Our capital is currently examining this communication. 14.85. The General Council took note of the statements. 15 PROPOSED GENERAL COUNCIL DECISION ON PROCEDURES TO ENHANCE TRANSPARENCY AND STRENGTHEN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER WTO AGREEMENTS – ARGENTINA; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHILE; COSTA RICA; THE EUROPEAN UNION; ISRAEL; JAPAN; NEW ZEALAND; NORWAY; SINGAPORE; SWITZERLAND; THE SEPARATE CU STOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU; UNITED KINGDOM; AND THE UNITED STATES (JOB/GC/204/REV.6 - JOB/CTG/14/REV.6) 15.1. The Chair recalled that t his item was included in the agenda of the General Council by the United States, together with the com munication in document JOB/GC/204/Rev.6 – JOB/CTG/14/Rev.6 ; and that the proposal ha d been discussed in the Goods Council. 15.2. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 15.3. Today we are bringing to the General Council a reform proposal intended to support meaningful and successful negotiations at the WTO. That proposal, as found in JOB/GC /204/Rev.6 and JOB/CTG/14/R ev.6, seeks to enhance transparency and improve Members ' ability to comply with notifications. The proposal h as substantial support from nearly one -third of the membership. 15.4. We are bringing this proposal to the General Council because the General Council has the responsibility for the overall functioning of the WTO and the WTO Agreements and Understandings covere d by the proposal. The Council has a duty to ensure that the WTO remains true to the central principle of transparency, which is foundational for a predictable and stable global trading environment. At its core, this proposal is an effort to respond to the needs of Members while enabling the WTO to function effectively. As we well know, the WTO cannot remain static if we wish it to continue championing smooth, predictable and free trade. Challenges must be addressed, and this proposal is an opportunity to d o so. From a systemic perspective, the information that Members should provide through existing notification obligations is necessary to improve the operation of various WTO agreements, Members ' monitoring work in WTO committees, and Members ' ability to negotiate meaningful agreements. 15.5. It has been almost two decades since the General Council tasked the Working Group on Notification Obligations and Procedures to review Members ' notification obligations and recommend WT/GC/M/19 2 - 116 - changes. The Working Group has essentially been dormant since then, while new Members have joined the WTO and the organization has undergone a number of changes. In the process of preparing this proposal, the co -sponsors have reached out to a broad range of Members to understand their needs and pe rspectives on how to improve notification capabilities. These conversations resulted in many constructive suggestions for actions and process improvements to notification procedures, which feature in the current version of the proposal. 15.6. I encourage those M embers who have not reviewed the proposal for some time to take a moment to do so. It does not seek to expand Members ' existing notification obligations or increase notification requirements in any way. The objective is to find ways to enable Members to me et existing commitments, which has benefits for the entire WTO Membership. To be clear, the goal of the proposal is not to penalize Members – we know that Members are making best efforts to submit complete notifications on time. Rather, this proposal is an effort to address notifications -related challenges at their root and help Members get the assistance they need, for the better functioning of the WTO as a whole. 15.7. We recognize that some Members face resource and capacity constraints and other challenges that hinder their ability to prepare and submit notifications in a timely manner. That 's why the proposal includes options for consideration by the Working Group, which is open to all Members, that would regularize online resources and support to Members bot h in Geneva and in capital , as officials work to prepare and submit notifications. 15.8. The proposal also contains a number of opportunities for Members to seek specific technical assistance and capacity building support to enable them to submit notifications – and to build their capabilities to do so moving forward. These provisions are designed to address capacity gaps and domestic coordination challenges as identified in past discussion of the proposal in the Council for Trade in Goods. And, in another effort to account for the development dimension, the proposal exempts LDCs from any administrative measures, provided that a Member seeks assistance and support for notification -related capacity building. 15.9. We welcome all opportunities to meet with Members to discuss the proposal in greater detail, and we are greatly appreciative of Members ' support for this initiative to reinforce transparency as a core principle for the effective functioning of the WTO. 15.10. The representative of the Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 15.11. Transparency plays a key role in creating and maintaining a stable and predictable environment for trade. Following the outbreak of COVID -19, it becomes all the more important , as exceptional measures are being take n in a number of Members to deal with the pandemic. My delegation highly values this revised proposal in that it strives for a right balance between the need for enhanced notifications and the burden of fulfilling that obligation. In particular, the recent version scraps the idea of punitive measures, which was the main obstacle to gaining support from certain Members. I am pleased to announce Korea' s intention to co -sponsor this proposal. 15.12. The representative of Norway provided the following statement: 15.13. Transparency is fundamental to the WTO, both as a basis for an effective monitoring function, as well as a basis for negotiating new rules. Norway would like to thank the proponents of this proposal for having listened to concerns raised by other Members, including Norway, in relation to earlier versions. After the element of financial sanction was dropped from the proposal, Norway is delighted to be counted among the co -sponsors. We urge other Members to support the proposal , as we believe that this will c ontribute to strengthening the foundation of the rules -based trading system anchored in the WTO. 15.14. The representative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 15.15. My delegation would like to thank the United States for its leadership in initiating th e reform and advocating this important proposal in the Council for Trade in Goods (CTG) over the past three years. We welcome the proposal being brought to the General Council for the first time. We firmly believe that it should be a crucial outcome that c ontributes to the work of WTO reform at MC12. We are very encouraged that the latest revision, discussed at the earlier July CTG meeting, received a WT/GC/M/19 2 - 117 - range of positive responses and constructive feedback from many Members. Members should have noted that the latest version has included significant changes that reflect comments heard in the previous discussion and different formats of outreach. While enhancing transparency and improving the operation and effectiveness of notification requirements continue to b e the common objective, we are of the view that this updated version now strikes a better balance between the notification obligation and the incentive for improving compliance in facing genuine capacity constraints. We therefore urge all Members to attach greater attention to the positive effect this proposal intends to achieve and to work collectively to develop a meaningful discipline on notification s that would improve the fundamental function of the WTO. 15.16. The representative of Canada provided the follow ing statement: 15.17. In reading through past interventions by Members on this proposal in the Council for Trade in Goods, three common threads appear to Canada. First, there is a universal recognition that compliance with notification requirements is an essenti al element in the context of Members discharging their WTO obligations. Only in this way can we provide other Members with the information and clarity on our laws and regulations, facts and figures, as well as the measures impacting upon international trad e. Second, that the first step should be a comprehensive review of notification requirements, in order to make an effort to understand the difficulties facing developing Members. Based on that review, updates to the notification requirements could then be considered, and more focussed technical assistance and capacity building could be provided to those Members that have fallen behind. And third, there were many voices objecting to the imposition of a financial penalty if non -compliance continued to exist. In reading through this substantially revised proposal, you will see clearly that these comments have been heard and incorporated. All that is left is for us now is to approve the proposal and activate the Working Group on Notification Obligations and Procedures to begin its efforts to support provision of that information and clarity all Members want. 15.18. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement: 15.19. Uruguay thanks the co -sponsors for the presentation of the sixth revision of this proposal, as well as the explanations provided on the changes made to it. My delegation would like to acknowledge the improvements contained in the proposal with respect to earlier versions, in particular the withdrawal of monetary sanctions from the list of Phase 2 Administrative Measures, and the removal of the explicitly unequal treatment for DS:1 notifications in agriculture. Uruguay has conveyed to the proponents its views on some points where it considers that further work and additional adjustments m ight be required to have a proposal with the appropriate balance and tone for reaching consensus at the multilateral level. An innovative element is that this week some Members presented JOB/AG/213 containing a proposal on transparency in agriculture for d iscussion in the CoA SS. We note that the co -sponsors of this proposal are also the co -sponsors of JOB/GC/204/Rev.6, and we have some concerns as to how the mandate for review and updating of G/AG/2 and the administrative sanctions in the general proposal would interact with the proposal in JOB/AG/213 to provide a standard 12 -month period for all Members except LDCs, regardless of whether or not they have AMS entitlements. Uruguay hopes to continue constructive exchanges on this topic not only with the prop onents but also with the rest of the membership, with a view to achieving concrete and balanced results to achieve a genuine improvement in transparency at the WTO, ensuring compliance by all Members with their respective notification commitments. 15.20. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 15.21. As others have said, transparency lies right at the heart of this organi zation and I would like to salute the United States for the leadership role they have made on this initiative and really welcome the new co -sponsors who have joined up to it. As our Canadian and US colleagues have said, we have made a real effort to try and listen to the comments of others before bringing this initiative to the General Council, in particular as was said, to consider the capacity constraints that some LDCs fair. I would appeal to others across this organi zation to join this initiative and we really look forward to taking it forward and put into practice. I think it can really aid us, as so many delegations have expressed in the last day or so. Increased transparency, as a means of increasing the trust which we need to build within this organiz ation. 15.22. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 118 - 15.23. We thank the proponents for updating and presenting this new version of the document. Overall, we support the changes, which we believe are a step in the right direction. In particular , we would like to welcome the changes with respect to differentiation in notifications and the elimination of financial penalties. However, while we agree that there is a need to examine formats and other tools to improve the notification processes, we st ill have concerns about the manner in which the revision of document G/AG/2 has been presented, as we believe that the language used in the current version could prejudge its outcome. We urge the proponents to continue to listen to the suggestions and conc erns of the Members, particularly with regard to agricultural notifications which could, at least for my delegation, enable it to co -sponsor this document. Hopefully, the work will continue in such a way as to steer this proposal towards reaching consensus among the Membership. 15.24. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 15.25. The African Group wishes to re -iterate its position on this item as expressed in previous discussions and General Council meetings. It is not sensible to impose punitive administrative measures and financial penalties against Members that fall behind in their notification obligations. Such measures, rather than assisting the concerned Members , would rather further exacerbate their situations. Members would need to acknowledge that technical assistance alone cannot be the solution to notification problems. Rather than proposing punitive measures, there should rather be a comprehensive assessment of the reasons why countries lag in their notification obligations. Many developing countries are unable to comply with their notification obligations due to the technical complexity of the notifications and institutional and capacity constraints. 15.26. The African Group is also concerned on t he proposal on "counter -notifications ". Innovative at it may sound, such practice would rather generate new sources of conflict amongst Members and not necessarily assist in strengthening the multilateral trading system. 15.27. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 15.28. We thank the United States for its introductory remarks and for this substantially revised version of the proposal. After the financial penalty was removed from the proposal, Switzerland decided to join the co -sponsors. Our decision was communicated at the last Council on Trade in Goods on 8 July this year. The latest amendments to the proposal demonstrate the willingness of the co -sponsors to take into account the concerns expressed by Members in order to fost er consensus in this important area of transparency. We wish to recall that compliance with our notification obligations is a prerequisite for effective monitoring of our respective trade policies, a key pillar of the WTO. Today, there is room to improve t he rate of compliance with notification obligations. In line with this objective, the present proposal provides a pragmatic and effective mechanism. Improving transparency in a broad sense would also contribute to restoring confidence among Members. 15.29. The representative of China provided the following statement: 15.30. We thank the proponents for updating this proposal. We note that a number of changes have been introduced and the financial penalties have been removed. We welcome this positive improvement. Transpar ency is important to the proper functioning of the multilateral trading system. We also see the importance of improving the compliance with notification obligations. However, China is of the view that the proposal should enhance transparency and strengthen notification requirements not only in goods, but also in service and intellectual property sectors. We should provide incentives to support Members ' efforts to meet its notification obligations, rather than take a punitive approach depriving Members ' legitimate rights as a WTO Member. We look forward to continuing discussions with proponents on this proposal. 15.31. The representative of Australia provided the following statement: 15.32. We strongly support this proposal. We want to thank the U nited States for its leadership in tabling it and we see the growing support for it because of the move away from disincentives to incentives. Given the importance of this issue for the multilateral rules -based system, and given – as the U nited States said – the simpl e means by which we can improve compliance with our notification obligations , rather than change the notification obligations, we urge others to consider WT/GC/M/19 2 - 119 - joining the proposal. We heard the comments from Mauritius and others today about their concerns on elements of the proposal and the burdens. If I can just point to Mauritius elements of the proposal that allow for an explanation on delay, it is precisely this sort of call for flexibility that was being asked for. We look forward to working with others to make sure that this is a significant contribution to the MC12 agenda. 15.33. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 15.34. As mentioned by the United States, the proposal has changed over time and the latest revision of June is an honest attempt to address the concerns that have been raised by Members. Improving on notifications will admittedly require efforts from all Members. Co -sponsors are willing to do their part too - all notifi cations are now subject to the same treatment. This revision also lays more emphasis on improving the existing tools at our disposal, as well as technical assistance and capacity building. It takes account of the particular constraints of L DCs by exempting them from administrative measures if they request assistance. We believe this revised proposal provides a solid basis for further engagement with Members in view of reaching agreement for an outcome at MC12. If concerns remain, we encourage Members to com e up with concrete ideas and suggestions that would effectively support Members ' efforts to improve in the crucial area that is transparency. 15.35. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 15.36. Japan thanks the United States for its introduction of the proposal. We appreciate the collective effort by all the co -sponsors, as well as the constructive engagement of other Members with this proposal. I would like to highlight two important points. First, this proposal does not create any new obligatio ns. Its aim is to improve the current situation surrounding notification requirements and the level of compliance, which is essential for the proper functioning of the WTO , and is accordingly sought by many Members. Second, enhancing transparency is one of the important pillars of the WTO reform. In order to achieve this goal, Japan, together with the other co -sponsors, has worked hard to make our proposal better reflect feedback from Members shared at the CTG and gathered through outreach efforts. We thank all Members for the various comments and feedback they have provided to date. Through this process, we are confident that the proposal has become more inclusive and balanced, especially in terms of addressing developing countries ' difficulties. Towards MC12, we hope to see consensus on this proposal to show our readiness and capability to reform the WTO. 15.37. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 15.38. We appreciate the many contacts engage d in by the sponsors and ourselves to explain the changes. Our Group is assessing the impact of this proposal upon our Members even though we are not in a negotiation position on this proposal. We appreciate that certain changes have been made and not e for example paragraph 10 recognizing the difficulties of LDCs, our preliminary comments on paragraphs 11 to 13, something a number of our Members had negative experiences with . They are not persuaded that such measures linked to the implementation by LDCs wo uld facilitate the application and compliance with their obligations in the multilateral trading system or our participation in the organization. This raises a problem : if ever there was a consensus , if a LDC requested aid, the conditions linked to flexibi lities regarding the compliance of obligations and the creation of new obligations , may make it difficult to actually address the various systemic problems that we have in our capital and in Geneva . It could very well be that LDCs do not possess all the capacity to submit their request in time and if they find themselves facing administrative procedures. On the framework of the TFA, LDCs have called for a proposal to provide for a timeframe during which the Secretariat could contact us in a proactive way , and also with reminders. However, given the breath of this proposal, other approaches may also be necessary in order to support LDCs , rather than having a punitive response or sanction . If the conditions for flexibility in paragraph 10 are not complied wit h, we understand that the co -sponsors have encountered some specific problems with some of the Members when it comes to respecting the notification requirements . The overall majority of Members , especially the LDCs , are not to be obliged to take on obligat ions further whereas part of the reform of the WTO would be doing the opposite, there would be two burdens . We still have a long way to go to correct the notification obligations requirements in LDCs . We will have to find approaches where we can implement and comply with existing notification requirements but without adding a further burden or additional punitive arrangements. We have learned a lot from these requirements in the TFA. The LDC Group is active in the work with the framework of the first WT/GC/M/19 2 - 120 - examin ation of the TFA , and the experience and the lessons learned concerning the notification requirements. 15.39. The representative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 15.40. I would like to align myself to the statement of the LDC Group. My delegation takes note of the proposed Decision and would like to thank the proponents. I would like to express our concerns, which we think if adopted may weaken the participation of most of developing members in the WTO rules-making process. As much as the proponents may have crafted the proposal based on good faith and intention, we believe that the Decision will adversely affect Members , particularly LDC s and developing Members. The draft provisions enumerated in paragraph 11 -13 of the proposed Decision are against the spirit of equality. They will divide Members into categories of privileged and less privileged ones. Considering our own experience on administrative measures relating the Budget, Finance and Administration (BFA) and focusing on th e empowerment of Members to fully participate in the rules -making process, my delegation is reluctant to support the proposed Decision. Nevertheless, we would like to urge proponents to consider recommending to the General Council collaborative approaches that will address challenges facing Members on notifications. 15.41. The representative of Costa Rica provided the following statement: 15.42. Costa Rica considers transparency to be a fundamental principle and a public good for the proper functioning of the multilater al trading system. This is a matter of individual responsibility and collective commitment, as without timely access to information, the WTO's monitoring and negotiation functions are weakened, and the risk of trade frictions and conflict grows. The WTO is performing a task which, performed elsewhere , would be available to just a few. Hence the value of strengthening these mechanisms and ensuring proper compliance. The proposal before the General Council today has evolved significantly since it was first presented to the Goods Council some years ago. The comments and constructive feedback received by the co -sponsors on the proposal during discussions in the Council for Trade in Goods and during the many consultations , enable us to present today a mat ure and robust outcome aimed at supporting Members in their notification work. We urge all Members to support this proposal, which helps towards effectively strengthening the WTO's transparency pillar. 15.43. The representative of Paraguay provided the following statement: 15.44. My delegation is pleased to note the improvements in the revised proposal contained in document JOB/GC/204/Rev.6. However, we remain concerned by paragraph 5 of this proposal. Our capital is in the process of evaluating all the changes made sin ce the fifth revision of this document so that we can define a position on the proposal as a whole. We will continue our dialogue with the proponents in order to move forward together. 15.45. The representative of Turkey provided the following statement: 15.46. Transpa rency is a fundamental element for the functioning of the WTO and any proposal for its improvement is considered as a positive step forward by Turkey. While engaging in efforts to enhance transparency , however , we should not lose sight of the genuine capacity constraints many developing and least developed countries face. There are times notification requirements may represent real challenges for countries that lack necessary infrastructure, technical capacity a nd required human resources. However, experience shows that once notified repetition is much easier. That’s why, we believe, what we need is simplification, longer timeframes, technical assistance and close guidance of the Secretariat to assist Members to comply. In that sense, we view that the last revision of JOB/CTG/14 contains meaningful proposals pertaining to the expanded role of the Working Group on Notifications. We are also pleased to see the removal of financial penalties from the proposal. Howeve r, we see that other administrative measures are still preserved. We consider that such administrative measures aimed at enhancing transparency bear the risk of pushing Members even further away from the system. As a conclusion, we are ready to work with t he interested Members on proposals that will bring pragmatic approaches to notifications to increase compliance. 15.47. The representative of Bangladesh provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 121 - 15.48. My delegation aligns itself with the statement delivered by Chad on behalf of the LDCs. My delegation thanks the U nited States and other co -sponsors for their submission. We have spoken on this issue in previous occasions and exchanged our views with other Members. We believe that transparency is an essential pillar. However, we do not think only a few notification templates can guarantee transparency. 15.49. I would like to refer to the commitment made in the Marrakesh Agreement Article XI.2, that the LDCs "(…) will only be required to undertake commitments and concessions to the exte nt consistent with their individual development, financial and trade needs or their administrative and institutional capabilities ". The same has also been guaranteed in paragraph 1 of the Uruguay Round Ministers ' Decision on Measures in Favour of Least -Developed Countries. These flexibilities have been allowed considering the systemic challenges of LDCs. 15.50. We thank the proponents for the 6th revision of this submission, and particularly for recognizing the difficul ties of some Members and their capacity constraints to comply with the notification requirements. We have earlier pointed out that notification provisions under different Agreements are of diverse nature and the capability of the LDCs do not allow them to notify on time. These countries are constrained by the lack of technical capacity and unique internal coordination challenges to comply with the notification obligations. 15.51. We appreciate the co -sponsors for suggesting technical assistance for the Members fa cing difficulties in notifications. The ongoing efforts of the WTO Secretariat to provide technical support and customized trainings for the LDC candidates are deeply appreciated. However, the fact remains, these initiatives though useful, are not near eno ugh to take us to an expected level of progress. We believe that without addressing the capacity gaps and tackling the domestic coordination issues, only administrative measures at the WTO will not be able to improve the situation. We look forward to worki ng with the Members on this issue. 15.52. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP , provided the following statement: 15.53. I take the floor on behalf of the ACP Group. We also thank the co -sponsors for their submissions on this agenda item. The ACP Group considers transparency and notification requirements to be particularly important areas. Transparency reduces information asymmetries and contributes to predictability in the trading environment which is beneficial for all Members. The Group remains concerned about the punitive measures contemplated in document JOB/GC/204/Rev.6 under the heading Administrative Measures. Should punitive measures and sanctions be introduced as instruments for promoting compliance with transparency and notification obligations, as proposed, this will serve only to further alienate many developing countries from the WTO, and may even undermine the already faltering capacity of Members to agree on future binding commitments and be further marginalised in the WTO system. Furthermore, the ACP Group observes that punitive measures relating to a breach under a covered Agreement, if imposed without recourse to the dispute settlement pro cess, may constitute unauthorised enforcement, and be of uncertain legality. It must be emphasized that failure to adhere to notification obligations is not wilful on the part of many developing countries. These countries face formidable capacity and insti tutional constraints in meeting the numerous regular and ad hoc notifications required under the WTO Agreements. 15.54. For the ACP Group, therefore, the starting point must be engagement in meaningful dialogue on the underlying reasons for non -compliance by dev eloping and least developed countries. These reasons would include, but are not limited to, notification templates which remain too complicated , limited technical and human resources , and difficulties relating to domestic inter -agency coordination, especia lly as transparency and notification obligations increasingly impinge on a large number of national agencies and economic actors. The ACP Group believes that the Working Group on Notification Obligations and Procedures can be usefully reactivated for the p urpose of this important discussion. The ACP Group further shares the view, also expressed by some other Members, that transparency should not be limited to compliance with notification obligations. It must permeate the entire functioning of the WTO system , including areas such as the scheduling of meetings, the conduct of negotiations, and in the preparation, organi zation, and decision -making relating to Ministerial Conferences. Special attention should also be paid to conformity by developed countries wit h transparency and notification requirements that have the effect of facilitating or contributing to improved market access for developing countries, especially those pertaining to technical barriers to trade and phytosanitary measures, and to the establis hment of mechanisms such as trade facilitation and Enquiry Points. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 122 - 15.55. Additionally, the role of the Secretariat should be strengthened in regard to transparency and notification obligations, but we recommend that this should be achieved primarily through enhancing further its supportive role in providing technical assistance to developing and least - developed Members. However, the ACP Group does not contemplate any role for the Secretariat to make notifications on behalf of Members. Furthermore, the Secretaria t should work closely with developing and least -developed Members in identifying and addressing their technical assistance and capacity building needs regarding transparency and notification, and this role should be strengthened. In closing, proposals with respect to transparency and notification must be thoroughly examined and tested against the fundamental principles of the WTO, which are without fault , such as the consensus rule in decision -making. Essentially, the work on all elements of WTO reform shou ld be handled in a holistic manner that allows the participation of all Members. Finally, while the ACP cannot acquiesce to the draft Decision before us today, we will remain engaged and constructive in discussions on every aspect of reform. We are also de veloping a contribution which we hope to put forward in the General Council in the not-too-distant future. 15.56. The representative of Chile provided the following statement: 15.57. Chile has joined this initiative as a co -sponsor for three reasons. First, because we understand that all WTO Members have assumed the obligation to notify our trade measures, which is stipulated in the various WTO legal texts, and because we are conscious that the current low level of notifications at this organization is a seri ous problem for the WTO's transparency and credibility. It creates situations that border on the absurd, as has been rightly stressed on a number of occasions by the Director General. Second, because the revised proposal accommodated various visions and comments, meaning that a number of aspects have objectively been improved. These improvements include the elimination of financial penalties for failure to comply with the obligation to notify and enhanced support from the Secretariat so that developing coun tries, especially LDCs, are able to fulfil their obligations. Third, the revised proposal no longer draws any distinctions between the different notifications, meaning that they will all be subject to the same treatment. We call on those Members that have not yet joined this proposal to consider it as a substantive support for the work of the WTO. 15.58. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 15.59. Pakistan thanks the co -sponsors for the revised document. Chair, we take this opportunity to emp hasize that Pakistan takes its notification obligations seriously. We believe that transparency is a fundamental pillar of the WTO, which brings predictability to trade. However, we are not sure that the current proposal will have the desired impact of imp roving transparency. To address that issue, the real problems must be addressed. In the case of developing countries, it is the severe capacity constraints, lack of technical training of staff, lack of institutional capacity, and insufficient human resourc es to carry out the desired tasks in the stipulated time in the cumbersome detail they are required. These are not mere excuses , they are defining attributes of developing countries, generally, and no amount of technical assistance but only development wil l overcome these shortcomings. If I may give an analogy, cars have gauges that give you data, go -carts don 't. Data, or lack of it , is a systemic issue in most developing countries. But we do try our best to keep up with our obligations. On the other hand, Pakistan considers that many countries , including some of the developed ones , find it difficult to comply with their notification obligations. While we all endeavour to submit all notifications in a complete and timely manner, no Member is fully compliant with all its transparency obligations at all times. This points to fundamental issues in the requirements and obligations, which might be the root of the problem. Pakistan therefore reiterates its views that administrative and puni tive measures would not lead to an optimal resolution. Such measures risk being counterproductive as they do not address the main causes of non -compliance. Instead, we call for simplifying procedures, and seek an approach that makes the obligations easier and less complicated. 15.60. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 15.61. CARICOM also aligns itself with the statement delivered by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP. We thank the co -sponsors for their submission under t his agenda item. CARICOM has always recognized the importance of transparency and notification in the WTO. Creating a critical mass of compliance with transparency and notification obligations can only redound to the benefit of all WTO Members. Therefore, prima facie, there is value in agreeing to procedures to enhance transparency and strengthen notification requirements. However, how this is achieved is equally as important as WT/GC/M/19 2 - 123 - what is achieved. It is in this context that we consider a punitive approach, c ouched as administrative measures in the submission from co -sponsors, as a sub -optimal approach. Developing and least - developed countries are the ones likely to be most adversely affected by punitive measures. A punitive approach also implies a certain wilfulness on the part of the many developing and least - developed countries that have encountered challenges with respect to their transparency and notification obligations. However, rather than a wilful flouting of the obligations, it is more often than not a lack of capacity stemming from deficits in human resources and finances. We suggest that proponents engage with developing and least developed countries, including CARICOM, on the nature and extent of the challenges which we face in meeting transparency and notification obligations. From here, we can better assess the technical assistance and capacity building needs of Members. We also suggest that the Working Group on Notification Obligations and Procedures be reactivated, and we can advance discussions there and when that work is sufficiently mature, we can return to the General Council to seek a decision which is in the best interest of all Members. CARICOM intends to remain constructive on these important issues. 15.62. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 15.63. We would like to thank the cosponsors of the revised document in JOB/GC/204/Rev.6 and the further explanation of changes made to the original proposal as put forward by the U nited States. We align ourselves with the Statement by the Africa Group and the ACP Group . South Africa views transparency as one of the important pillars of the multilateral trading system. The Paper titled "An Inclusive Approach to Transparency and Notification Requirements in the WTO" is our departure point and Jamaica has referred to the core issues raised therein. We also need to recognize the challenges that developing countries face in meeting their transparency obligations due to limited capacities and resources, especially in the context of a crisis. 15.64. We remain concerned with the proposed administrative measures that aim to penalize Members that are unable to comply with their obligations. We believe that this represents a disproportionate response to the inability of many developing coun tries to fulfil their notification obligations due to capacity constraints, especially when the inability of many developing countries to comply is not wilful neglect of obligations, but is primarily due to serious capacity constraints at Member s' level. We are concerned at the attempts to introduce changes to notification obligations under the Agreements and Understandings listed in paragraph 1 of the proposal without following the amendment processes prescribed under the Marrakesh Agreement, thus severely affecting the rights and obligations of Members. Similarly , the intention to use Members ' TPR reports as a basis for the enforcement of specific obligations or the imposition of new policy commitments on Members. The TPRM was never intended to serve as a basis for the enforcement of specific obligations under the Agreements or to impose new policy commitments on Members. While this revised paper has addressed the financial penalties, it still does not address notification requirements on final bound rate AMS commitments for developed Members to 2 years. We look forward to engaging with the proponents to further engage on t he issues entailed therein. 15.65. The representative of Singapore provided the following statement: 15.66. This proposal has been cooking for the past two years and has taken on board the comments and feedback from many Members, including from Singapore. Hence, Singap ore was pleased to cosponsor this proposal at the Council for Trade in Goods on 8 July. Let me make three points on the revised proposal. First, the current version of the proposal strikes the right balance between assistance and administrative measures. F or example, an earlier proposal to impose a financial penalty for Members who cannot comply with their notification obligations has been removed. Second, we believe that this proposal will make a helpful contribution to improving the transparency of Member s' trade regimes and further facilitate global trade in the broader context. For example, it proposes specific improvements such as simplified notification formats, updating reporting requirements as well as identifying enablers , such as holding additional training and workshops at the Committee level and using digital tools. These specific proposals will support Members' efforts to submit timely and complete notifications. Third, an outcome on transparency at MC12 would strengthen the WTO's monitoring func tion. As the Director -General had highlighted at last Friday's TNC meeting, many Members call for increased transparency, but we need to back this up with concrete action and submit information about our trade measures in a timely manner so that all Member s can respond quickly, especially given the pandemic. In addition, as we want to reform the WTO to make it more relevant to stakeholders, we must ensure that it is able to carry out its regular work more effectively. It would also send a strong signal to o ur stakeholders that Members see WT/GC/M/19 2 - 124 - continued value in a transparent and rules -based multilateral trading system. Singapore looks forward to working with all Members to advance work on this proposal. 15.67. The representative of India provided the following statemen t: 15.68. Despite the revisions that the proposal has undergone we find that the inherent principle of the proposal , i.e. suspicion , remains the same. India finds it difficult to agree to a proposal which provides for administrative actions in case of default in submitting notifications, rather than taking cognizance of the capacity constraints and other legitimate difficulties faced b y Members in meeting their notifications obligations under the WTO Agreements. Therefore, what is required is not to assume wilful default, but to encourage those who are able to update their notifications despite difficulties faced, and to assist those wh o have not been able to do so because of various reasons, including capacity constraints. Though Rev.6 refers to certain solution in this direction, it fails to address the problem at its root. India would therefore , once again, re -iterate that instead of the administrative actions, appropriate support to notify will encourage Members in improving their internal capacity to fulfil their notification obligations. With our experience, we have seen that incentives work better than administrative actions in suc h matter. Further, transparency cannot only be seen from the view of notification obligations. In this morning 's discussion, both in informal and formal G eneral Council meetings , under agenda item 22, we have seen how the lack of transparency has failed us in agreeing to Chairs of various bodies/ Committees. Transparency should permeate the full spectrum of the operation of the WTO, from the conduct of its day -to-day meetings, to how Ministerial Conferences and processes preceding them in Geneva are conducte d, and how media releases of various Committee s and C ouncils ' proceedings are transparently handled. We would have appreciated if proponents would have also taken note of a proposal in JOB/GC/218 submitted by India in 2019 , that essentially calls for enhan ced Mode 4 GATS transparency to allow for an effective realization of market access, more transparency in the monitoring mechanism placed under Article 66.2 of TRIPS Agreement, Members to make annual notifications on the number of patent applications based on traditional knowledge to prevent unlawful appropriation of biological resources and/or associated traditional knowledge affecting the traditional communities , to name a few examples. We are concerned by looking at the lack of engagement on this issue b y proponents of transparency , and we hope to see comprehensive discussions on this issue in the future. 15.69. The representative of Israel provided the following statement: 15.70. Transparency is a vital element of the multilateral trading system. We agree with what India has said regarding the importance of transparency in general. It allows Members to monitor the proper implementation of WTO Agreements, it serves as a basis for fut ure negotiations, and it helps Members to make well -informed policy decisions. Israel is one of the co -sponsors of the paper and we would like to thank the United States for its leadership in this initiative. We would like to encourage all the WTO Members to assess this revised proposal and to support it. 15.71. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 15.72. I would like to thank each speaker individually, for brevity I will note just a few. First, I want to thank everyone for their eng agement and responses on this. It has been a long time since we have discussed this in the CTG and we have worked hard to do a lot of outreach, which I think has come through in the revisions. I would like to at least acknowledge the intervention from the representative of Korea and thank them for their announcement , and w elcome them on board as co-sponsors. We clearly have a lot of outreach to do to explain the revisions , but we would like to reiterate that all financial penalties have been removed from th e proposal. The proposal includes multiple layers of flexibility that are designed specifically so that any Member who endeavours to comply is not captured by those. On the comments made by Uruguay and Mexico and Paraguay, in particular, we have heard your concerns and we are working to address them. We should have some responses soon that may hopefully address this concern. With respect to the intervention by Mauritius, we appreciate the African Group's response, and we look forward to some more detailed discussions with them. I believe that, if we were able to sit down, we could explain that the proposal itself is not unreasonable and that, in fact, it is not arbitrary. We worked quite hard to make sure that it is reasonable . We are trying to do exactly what Mauritius pointed out, which is to find a way to distinguish between wilful noncompliance and those who are struggling legitimately to fulfil their obligations. The majority of the proposal aims specifically to strengthen th at category of Members. I appreciate the acknowledgment of Ambassador Spencer of Jamaica and the ACP Group and others on the importance of the Working Group and what that could establish. I think many of the concerns WT/GC/M/19 2 - 125 - we heard today about the individual cap acity and the strengthening of domestic coordination mechanisms can actually be achieved through the Working Group. I know that if you look at the work in the TBT Committee or the SPS Committee, or even in Agriculture, it is those Member -to- Member conversa tions about how each of us operate and runs our inter -agency coordination, that has improved and strengthened both the Enquiry Points and our ability to fulfil the notifications. 15.73. I want to thank Chad and the LDC group. We will continue our outreach with t hem. We are trying to precisely address those systemic problems that they have addressed. I would note and congratulate them , LDCs were far more compliant in the TFA notification process than developing countries. Hence, we know that it is possible. I woul d also note that one particular LDC is the largest user of the TBT notification process. I think that it shows that the work that has been undertaken in these Committees to strengthen the domestic processes actually has results. That is where we are headed with the Working Group in trying to strengthen those discussions. We understand that technical assistance is not enough, but what alternative do we have to look at cooperative mechanisms among Members to begin to build up capacity and exchange ideas? That is precisely what we are aiming at the Working Group. Obviously, we don 't have all the answers for everyone 's problems today, but what we are trying to do is to create a mechanism to build that capacity going forward. I think Bangladesh and Tanzania also mentioned strengthening some of those domestic coordination measures. With respect to India' s comments, I would agree that no one assumes wilful default. The proposal tries to address multiple avenues for finding and identifying assistance . I think it is i ncumbent on all of us to make sure that we have mechanisms in place that support better compliance. It is useful to remind Members that these are existing obligations, these are not new obligations. We are supporting the operation of existing obligations a nd the fulfilment of these commitments. I think that the incentives are participation in the multilateral trading system , the incentives flow from the compliance. There were too many comments to address today, but I think this was a helpful discussion and we are really enthusiastic about the response we received. We are looking forward to doing more outreach. 15.74. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement: 15.75. Transparency is invaluable to the proper functioning of the rules-based multilateral trading system. We see the importance of improving compliance with the basic notification obligation under the WTO Agreement s, and therefore look with interest at the proposal in JOB/GC/204/Rev.6 of 15 July 2021. We note the revisi ons in the latest version, Rev . 6 of 15 July 2021, of the proposal and, among others, we welcome the removal of financial penalties. We also note the flexibilities on implementation and those afforded to Members who request technical assistance, and the pr oposed technical and institutional improvements to the notification exercise. The Philippines will continue to engage on this proposal and thank the proponents for their flexibility and continued commitment to engage other Members. 15.76. The General Council took note of the statements. 16 JOINT COMMUNICATION ON SYSTEMIC ISSUES – STATEMENT BY SWITZERLAND 16.1. The Chair recalled that t his item had been included in the agenda of the General Council by the delegation of Switzerland. 16.2. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 16.3. I wish to introduce a communication on systemic issues cosponsored by developing and developed Members tha t are strongly supportive of the Multilateral Trading System. 16.4. The communication is contained in document WT/GC/W/827. It is dated 27 July 2021 and was issued on the same day. The communication is cosponsored by the following 3 1 Members: Albania; Australia ; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; Guatemala; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Israel; Japan; Liechtenstein; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Republic of Korea; Malaysia; Mexico; Republic of Moldova; New Zealand; Nigeria; Norway; Paraguay; Peru; Russia; Singapore; Switzer land; Thailand; The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; Turkey; Uruguay. 16.5. The Twelfth WTO Ministerial Conference will already take place in a few months and preparatory work is already in full swing. The co-sponsors are committed to a successful 12th WTO WT/GC/M/19 2 - 126 - Ministerial Conference and urge Members to engage constructively and to work towards pragmatic and tangible outcomes. It will be important that Ministers provide political guidance on outcomes for MC12, including on the WTO's futu re work. 16.6. With this Joint Communication on Systemic Issues, the co -sponsors wish to share their contribution to the systemic part of a Ministerial outcome document for MC12. We hope that Members can support this approach as we continue to work towards MC12. The Joint Communication consists of three parts, of which I would like to highlight a few elements: 16.7. The first part stresses the relevance of the rules -based multilateral trading system. This part reaffirms the principles and objectives set out in the Marr akesh Agreement Establishing the WTO. It notes the major role trade can play in the promotion of sustainable development and the alleviation of poverty. The co -sponsors recognize the WTO as the preeminent global forum for trade rules-setting and governance . They call on Members to safeguard the integrity of the open, non-discriminatory and rules -based Multilateral Trading System embodied in the WTO and to work together to ensure its sound functioning. The co -sponsors also reaffirm the central importance of development in the WTO. 16.8. The second part addresses the importance and relevance of the multilateral trading system in the context of the global health crisis. The response to this crisis remains a priority of the co - sponsors. International cooperation and c oordination is needed more than ever to fight the pandemic and make the system more resilient for the future. The WTO has an important role to play in maintaining well -functioning supply chains. A predictable, transparent, non -discriminatory and open global trading system is crucial for a broad -based, sustainable and inclusive economic recovery. 16.9. The third part addresses the need for WTO Reform. For co -sponsors, it is critical that the WTO respond s in an effective way to a changing international trading environment, which calls for new and updated global trade rules. They will also support continued and renewed efforts to reform the WTO to ensure its sound functioning. 16.10. A productive negotiating func tion is essential for the WTO to deliver meaningful outcomes for Members at all levels of development. The co -sponsors will strive to make further progress in an open and inclusive manner on issues of interest to Members and to seek high quality outcomes. In this regard, they recognize that a range of approaches, including plurilateral negotiations, such as the Joint Statement Initiatives, can ultimately support and contribute to the shared objectives. 16.11. The co -sponsors remain committed to fully participatin g in the important regular work of the WTO. The regular WTO bodies have an essential role in ensuring oversight of the implementation of WTO agreements. The WTO 's trade monitoring work contributes to the effective functioning of the multilateral trading sy stem, by enhancing transparency of trade policies and practices of Members. In this regard, the co -sponsors call on Members to fully comply with their notification obligations. 16.12. The co -sponsors reaffirm their commitment to abide by the WTO's rules in the co nduct of their trade relations. The WTO 's two-tier dispute settlement system and its binding nature is a central element in providing security and predictability to the multilateral trading system. The co -sponsors therefore recall their strong resolve to r estore its effective functioning, including through necessary reforms, and call on all Members to constructively engage in finding solutions to identified concerns. 16.13. This ends my presentation of this joint communication that, as I mentioned at the outset, i s intended to provide an input to the systemic part of a Ministerial outcome document for MC12. We very much hope that Members will seek inspiration from this contribution when we start drafting the outcome document for MC12. 16.14. The representative of China provided the following statement: 16.15. It is the consistent position of China that we staunchly support the rule s-based multilateral trading system, and firmly oppose unilateralism and protectionism. In the context of C OVID -19 pandemic, the multilateral trading system, with the WTO at its core, should play a more important role in the pandemic response , cooperation and economic recovery. China believes that to restore the Appellate Body and safeguard the two -tier dispute settlement system remains the top -most priority for WTO reform , and we call upon Members to start substantive discussions as soon as WT/GC/M/19 2 - 127 - possible. China sincerely hopes all Members could utter more loud and clear voices in supporting the multilateral trading system and work jointly to achieve consensual outcomes at MC12. 16.16. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 16.17. We are not a co -sponsor but there is much in this communication that we very much commend. We support efforts like this to affirm the rules -based multilateral trading system and indeed the need for a reform of this Organization in order to support that. We particularly agree with the centrality of this Organization in the multilateral trading syste m, as well as the importance of an open, predictable and transparent system to secure the sort of inclusive, sustainable, greener recovery that I think we all want to see after this pandemic. I also want to mention in this context, in the response to this pandemic, we have just announced today the delivery of the first 9 million of the promised 100 million doses to developing countries . Those 9 million of AstraZeneca vaccines are being delivered in the course of this week and next for a number of developing countries, most of them through the COVAX mechanism. 16.18. As well as the existing negotiations and systemic discussions on reform, we would like to see further reform of the WTO rulebook to mitigate, amongst other things, the impact of market distorting pract ices in the global trading system, including the use of industrial subsidies. We look forward to working with Members across this organi zation to progress this reform agenda, both up to, and beyond MC12. 16.19. The representative of Uruguay provided the following statement: 16.20. The Friends of the System (as already pointed out by colleagues who preceded me in the use of the expression) are seeking to draw the attention of the rest of the membership to systemic, cross cutting issues that relate to the smooth functioning of the multilateral system. It is for this reason that Uruguay is a co -sponsor of this joint communication, which we hope can serve as a basis for the preamble of a possible Ministerial Declaration. This communication emphasizes t he importance of a rules -based multilateral system, the negative effects of protectionism, whose dramatic consequences we see on a daily basis, and also the key role of the development dimension in the pillar of negotiations. It also highlights the fundame ntal role that the WTO must play in addressing the COVID -19 pandemic and the economic crisis that has resulted from it, perhaps the most important issue we must address at the next Ministerial Conference. Also, it reserves a prominent place for the long ov erdue reform, including the negotiating function and transparency. Lastly, it refers to the situation of the Appellate Body, whose disappearance has had serious repercussions on one of the key pillars of the organization. All of these topics are at the hea rt of the multilateral trading system, whose smooth functioning is so important to us. We hope that between now and November we will be able to continue working with Members to reach a consensus on a Ministerial Declaration that we consider so necessary in the current situation. 16.21. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement: 16.22. No one can question or deny the primacy and integrity of the rules -based multilateral trading system. We thus understand the strong call on all Members to safe guard and strengthen the sound functioning of the multilateral trading system. There has been a focus on the role the WTO can play in addressing the C OVID -19 pandemic and global health crises, and understandably so because the WTO exerts tremendous influen ce on global supply chains. The attention the communication gives to WTO reform could be described as à-propos . We need to reinvigorate the negotiating function of the WTO, including through the plurilateral processes. We need to ensure that WTO bodies con tinue to run efficiently , and we also need to restore the effectiveness of the two -tier dispute settlement system. 16.23. The representative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 16.24. We hope Members can all support the join communication to secure the stability and certainty of the rule -based multilateral trading syste m, to attach importance and relevance of the multilateral trading system in the context of the global health crisis, and to carry out WTO reforms on all three pillars as early a s possible. 16.25. The representative of the Russian Federation provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 128 - 16.26. The elements of the statement presented by Switzerland are in line with Russia's priorities as outlined in our communication "MC12: Shaping the Package Agenda " (JOB/GC/261). My delegation is pleased to join this statement as one of co -sponsors. 16.27. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 16.28. We firmly support the communication as one of the cosponsors. In order to strengthen the multilateral trading system, we consider it important to update trade rules, including by using JSIs, enhance transparency and strengthen notification requirements, and reform the Dispute Settlement System. The multilateral trading system is all the more important post COVI D-19 pandemic. 16.29. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 16.30. We are studying the proposal and we will make initial comments. There are elements in the proposal we find useful which can be the basis for the systemic elements of the M inisterial Declaration. These include reaffirming the relevance and support for the multilateral trading system ; multilateralism, including the principles and objectives set out in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO ; and the centrality of the rul es-based multilateral trading system; the centrality of development which should underpin the work of the WTO and as critical to the effective integration of developing countries in global trade, including to inclusive growth and development . Regarding the relevance of the WTO in the context of the pandemic, we believe that the WTO has a role and that the pandemic has reminded all of us of the need for global solidarity and the need for the system to promote inclusive economic recovery. This is why we be lieve that one of the themes should be on this - this is the only way we will be able to contribute to resilient economies. We are however, concerned that the proposal does not address other barriers such as intellectual property as part of the response , and limits it only to maintaining well -functioning supply chains. 16.31. On WTO reform , there is a need to talk about what we mean by reform. Our view is that JSIs are raising systemic and developmental concerns for us and actually fragment the multilateral tradin g system , undermin ing existing multilateral mandates. We therefore have concerns with what is captured under WTO reform. WTO reform does not mean accepting either inherited inequities or new proposals that would worsen imbalances. Reforms must be premised on the principles of inclusivity and development . We however, welcome the call to restore effective functioning of a two - tier dispute settlement system . 16.32. The representative of Mauritius provided the following statement: 16.33. There are a number of elements in t his paper which converge with our own thinking and with the African Group 's paper that will be presented later. I note some of them : the reaffirmation of the relevance and the support extended to the multilateral trading system and the importance of the multilateral trading system in the context of the global health crisis. Of course, it is not totally adequate . We see some words missi ng like "solidarity " and "leaving no one behind ", but that is maybe a question of differences of perspectives. We fully agree , especially that the multilateral trading system and trade have an important role in taking the sustainable development goals forward. In fact, we are happy to be able to see this reflected in the elements paper for MC12. 16.34. We find the paragraph 2 of the document rather inadequate as a response to the global health crisis, for reasons stated by South Africa . I also recall that , while the African Group's position on the centrality of the Intellectual Propert y Waiver in the WTO 's response to COVID -19 is well known, there were several other issues mentioned yesterday including the movement of inputs for the production of vaccines , transfe r of technology, access to essential goods, equitable distribution of vaccines, which are all part of the response to COVID -19. We believe, therefore, that the focus cannot only be on well -functioning supply chains in the health context . In fact , given the difficult challenges that Africa has faced, particularly during the pandemic, well -functioning supply chains are also for food security purposes. 16.35. We agree with the document 's emphasis on a predictable, transparent, non -discriminatory and open global trad ing system, for broad -based sustainable and inclusive economies. We also require that the global trading system delivers effectively on special and differential treatment . We also require a multilateral trading system that strives for sustainability and se rves to save both lives and livelihoods. Th is perspective is rather lacking in the document, but we are sure that these can WT/GC/M/19 2 - 129 - be taken on board. On the issue of reform, reform does not happen in a vacuum but within a context . To us, the context is taking forward all the unfinished business, in particular from the Doha Development Round . I think , as Ambassador Chambovey of Switzerland said, development is at the core, development is the centre of the system. It is not reform for the s ake of reform . It must be clear what the ultimate objective of such reform would be before we engage. Achieving development based on sustainable principles is, from our perspective, a key element of the reform . So, we would rather see a reform that has bee n discussed already among Members to see what are the parameters that will guide the discussion on the reform. 16.36. Finally, we agree that the changing international trade environment does require us to adapt to new realities. We joined the WTO on a certain pr emise of the Marrakesh Agreement , as highlighted in paragraph 1 of this document. In that context, our approach es within the WTO must always be based on agreed mandates by the membership. 16.37. The representative of Tajikistan provided the following statement: 16.38. The Joint Communication on Systemic Issues is under review and consideration of the capital and we will present our position once we receive the relevant updates and instruction s. The Republic of Tajikistan attaches great importance towards trade and economic relations with WTO members, particularly during the pandemic. It is clear that the pandemic has created devastating social, economic and political crises. In order to mitigat e the negative impact of COVID -19 to the economy , joint decisive and timely action is required. The Republic of Tajikistan greatly values the WTO and acknowledges its central role within the rules -based multilateral trading system and is confident that constructive cooperation under the WTO framework will allow to maintain economic cooperation despite the global spread of the pandemic. 16.39. The representative of Republic of Korea provided the following statement: 16.40. Korea calls on Members to start to work together to reflect the major elements contained in the Joint Communication in the outcome document of MC12 , to produce a concrete forward -looking vision aimed at making the WTO more responsive to the challenges ahead, in particular through the long-awaited WTO re form in three main pillars. 16.41. The representative of Singapore provided the following statement: 16.42. Singapore is happy to co -sponsor the Joint Communication and commend Switzerland's initiative and diligent efforts. This Joint Communication is timely and will make an important contribution towards a positive outcome at MC12. Second, the Joint Statement addresses critical systemic issues faced by t he WTO. If I can use an analogy, the WTO is like a computer that must undergo periodic technical refresh so that we can upgrade the WTO and equip it to handle new software , such as issues dealing with the digital economy, trade and health and environmental sustainability. At the same time, we also need to continue to upgrade the existing hardware by restoring the effective functioning of the Appellate Body. Only then can we ensure that the WTO remains fit for purpose. Third, Singapore wishes to join Switzer land to encourage all Members to cosponsor the Joint Statement. At a time when the WTO is under stress and scrutiny, Members must demonstrate that we are united in our common beliefs and values. This joint statement presents a good platform for Members to come together. 16.43. The representative of Viet Nam provided the following statement: 16.44. Viet Nam is still considering the Joint Communication in its entirety. We share the view that it is timely to give input to shape the MC12 outcome in a concrete form , this Joint Communication is a welcome effort in this regard. We are also of the view that it contains a number of essential systemic elements for a possible MC12 outcome document and encourage Members to consider their incorporation as much as possible. 16.45. The repres entative of India provided the following statement: 16.46. India is happy to note that part of the submission is borrowed from the "Reform Proposal " submitted by India with other co -sponsors in the December 2020 General Council meeting and under agenda item 14 discussed today in this meeting. India remains fully committed to the rules -based WT/GC/M/19 2 - 130 - multilateral trading system with WTO as its centre piece. In that regard we hope that MC12 will be successful in delivering a fair, balanced and meaningful outcomes that w ill reflect the interests of developing and LDC Members of this Organization. We believe that a successful MC will go a long way in restoring the credibility of this institution and also repose everyone 's faith in the multilateral trading system. Most impo rtantly, this organization needs to show its relevance by delivering a robust response to the COVID -19 pandemic, which is perhaps one of the biggest health and socio - economic challenge s of our generation. In this regard, we urge all Members to engage const ructively and to work towards pragmatic, balanced and tangible outcomes at MC12. Leaving out intellectual property -related issues and movement of professionals (particularly health care workers) will make the proposal unbalanced and ineffective. 16.47. India gre atly values the WTO and the principles and objectives set out in the Marrakesh Agreement and the centrality of the rules -based multilateral trading system. Any attempt to bring in non -mandated outcome through the JSI route in MC12 will be counterproductive . Trade can play a major role in the promotion of sustainable development and the alleviation of poverty. The rules - based trading system contributes to fostering international trade and development, including through facilitating the peaceful settlement of trade disputes, and containing protectionism. We join others in reaffirming the central importance of development in the WTO. The WTO needs to remain an essential tool for Members to achieve inclusive and sustainable global growth and development, includi ng through the further integration of developing countries and LDCs into world trade. Finally, we emphasize the urgent need for reforming the WTO in order to correct the historical imbalances as well as to make it effective to address current and future ch allenges. In this regard, we would like to recall the WTO reform proposal submitted by India, along with other developing countries in August 2019 and again in December 2020, contained in document WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3. 16.48. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 16.49. We take note of the objectives of the communication. It is clear that in order to surmount the various sticky points we have to reform the WTO and prove it functions well in order to meet the needs of its Members , being mindful of the expectations and priorities of LDCs. The rules of the WTO seek to provide for freedom, liberty, equality, predictability of trade patterns, setting the basis for trade negotiation and dealing with the various link s between different states , including through the dispute settlement mechanism. We know that the Appellate Body is not functioning. This uncertainty gives rise to a stalling of initiatives in the area of trade. If there is uncertainty, this will mean a dro p in foreign trade and have a negative impact on worldwide growth, employment and investment. We cannot sit back idly and let such a negative deleterious trend continue. We have to ensure the viability of the system. The multilateral trading system guarant ees and sets forth the conditions for proper and predictable trade and this is one of the best tools when it comes to the integration of LDCs into the scheme of world trade. At the same time, it stands against the idea that might makes right. We have to im prove the functioning of the WTO. It is against this backdrop that the LDC Group takes part in the efforts on reform , so as to arrive at a concrete, tangible result, especially within the context of MC12. 16.50. The representative of Ecuador provided the followi ng statement: 16.51. We think that the communication is constructive. It shows the importance of the proactive role of Members as an essential element which will allow us to recover the negotiating dynamic within this Organization and thus facilitate the functio ning of the multilateral trading system. We are delighted to announce that we will cosponsor the Joint Communication in order to reiterate our commitment to the success of MC12. Ecuador believes that this communication contains key elements where Members, both developed and developing, can contribute to the multilateral trading system, taking into account the current context and the importance that the work of this house becomes a positive factor for the recovery of international trade in the post -pandemic era. Furthermore, we wish to highlight that Ecuador attaches great importance and preference to multilateral negotiations. Ecuador highly values and recognizes the importance of the different negotiating approaches. We are part of the majority of the Joint Statement Initiatives, and we recognize the important advances made in investment facilitation for development, e -commerce and MSMEs. 16.52. The representative of Kazakhstan provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 131 - 16.53. We wish to express our support for this communicatio n, and we hope that this document will serve as a strong basis for a future Ministerial Declaration at MC12. 16.54. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement: 16.55. Mexico and 26 other Members of this organization have submitted this Joint Communication which seeks, from a constructive point of view, to help prepare a document that would be the outcome of the Twelfth Ministerial Conference (MC12). The Communication proposes language on three elements tha t we consider essential: (i) reaffirming the relevance of and support for the multilateral trading system; (ii) the importance and relevance of the multilateral trading system in the context of the global health crisis; and (iii) the need for WTO reform in its three pillars. We are confident that this communication contributes in a systemic manner to the discussions we will have after the summer break , aimed at preparing a document to be approved by our Ministers at MC12. 16.56. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 16.57. I would like to thank all delegations who have made a statement in support of this communication. Some are co -sponsoring clearly, and others are supporting important elements of the communication. We are pleased to see tha t, on some elements, there is high -level of convergence. This will certainly be very useful for the work that we will have to undertake after the summer break in order to draft the outcome document for MC12. We can certainly bank on this. When we drafted t his document, what we had in mind was to use formulations that are more likely to attract consensus among the membership without forgetting the objective of the cosponsors to preserve the integrity of the system and to ensure its good functioning. I would like to add that we very much welcome an additional co -sponsor, Ecuador, that has just been announced. 16.58. To expl ain, once again, the purpose of this communication, it is intended to be a contribution, a kind of platform, on which we can build. It is not meant to be the entire outcome document; our assumption is that an outcome document will consist in a systemic or political part, and of another part where decisions made by Members are going to be referenced. We have heard some Members today consider that the parts on the pandemic are too "light" in our document. I would like to recall that there will probably be a m ore substantive part on trade and health and on the pandemic in the outcome at MC12. This outcome, those results, will certainly be referenced in the second part of the Ministerial document or in the MC12 outcome documents. I believe that this important is sue of trade and health will not be treated as the "poor cousin" of the WTO , this is certainly not the case. It is a contribution to the systemic part of our work. We understand that there are other less consensual aspects that we have heard today. We are ready to engage with all delegations with a view to finding mutually acceptable formulations and solutions. That being said, the co -sponsors are certainly looking forward to contribut ing constructively to the work that will be undertaken after the summer break, in order to evolve and to draft an MC12 Ministerial outcome document. I thank all delegations for their statements, in particular those who have been supportive, and we are looking forward to continuing this discussion at the earliest possible junctu re. 16.59. The General Council took note of the statements. 17 STRENGTHENING THE MULTILATERAL CHARACTER OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION – REQUEST FROM THE AFRICAN GROUP 17.1. The Chair recalled that the item had been included in the agenda of the General Council at the re quest of the African Group. 17.2. The representative of Mauritius , on behalf of the African Group , provided the following statement: 17.3. The C OVID -19 pandemic has reminded us of the importance of global solidarity when faced with common and shared challenges. It has reminded us of the centrality of multilateralism and global solidarity in addressing common challenges. Importantly, it has highlighted the vast disparities between the haves and have nots amongst the membership of the WTO. The vaccine inequity is resulting in a two -track economic recovery process , with a disproportionate impact on Africa given the region's limited policy space. Forging the path towards a stronger and sustained recovery will require comprehensive and targeted policy actio ns and multilateral support. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 132 - 17.4. The preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO recognizes that international trade is not an end in itself, but a means towards "raising standards of living and ensuring full employment ". It further recognizes tha t "there is a need for positive efforts to be designed to ensure that developing countries, and especially the least developed among them, secure a share in the growth in international trade commensurate with the needs of their economic development ". 17.5. It is these ideals that ensured that the WTO is able to attract the diversity of countries, each with the hope to engage in a rules -based multilateral trading system that would serve the developmental needs of all its Members. Implicit in these ideals was the p rinciple of equality, equity and the guarantee that all voices mattered. The optimism with which developing countries embraced the WTO was grounded on the promise of prosperity that the trade rules agreed to , would deliver. A promise that trade would lead to equitable economic development, inclusive growth, industrialization, poverty alleviation – and would be responsive to their needs and the needs of their people. 17.6. COVID -19 continues to ravage the African Continent, with vaccination numbers lagging far behind other regions, let alone developed economies. The economic impact has been equally devastating on African economies, affecting the most vulnerable groups in our societies, largely women, the rural poor, youth and informal sector workers. Whilst real GDP in Africa is projected to grow by 3.4 % in 2021, this is on the back of a contraction of 2.1 % in 2020. This however masks the setbacks that are likely to have a lasting effect well after the pandemic has subsided, with estimates that up to 40 million p eople could be pushed into extreme poverty as a result. It is in this regard that we call for development to underpin the work of the WTO. 17.7. Building back better post pandemic should be about re -anchoring ourselves on the goals and principles of the Marrakes h Agreement. This necessitates preserving the multilateral character of the WTO and addressing existing asymmetries in trade agreements, especially in the Agreement on Agriculture which is critical to food security. 17.8. The WTO must contribute to the achievem ent of the SDGs. Indeed, the success and credibility of the WTO will not be assessed on the basis of the number of declarations we churn, but on the impact of the rules on our respective populations, the majority of whom reside in developing countries and LDCs. In the midst of C OVID -19, it will be judged on the basis of how responsive the WTO is to the health and economic crisis confronting us. We need a WTO that contributes towards equitable access to global public goods and that protects global commons on the basis of common but differentiated responsibilities. 17.9. We need to strengthen the multilateral trading system in a manner that benefits all, while providing sufficient flexibilities for developing countries to effectively integrate into global trade. Thi s should be given expression in the negotiating outcomes that we strive for in the various areas , by ensuring effective special and differential treatment and balanced, fair and equitable outcomes. 17.10. The two -tier dispute settlement system is fundamental to a fair and equitable rules -based multilateral trading system and must be urgently restored. The biggest risk of a dysfunctional Appellate Body is borne by smaller WTO Members who are likely to be subjected to unilateralism and power dynamics. Without the A ppellate Body, the WTO dispute settlement system is losing much of its predictability. This in turn has serious implications for the rights and obligations of Members and has serious consequences for future rule -making efforts in the WTO, as the value of ne gotiated outcomes depends on the ability of signatories to enforce them. 17.11. The Africa n Group is confident that collectively we can summon the courage to gravitate back to the foundational principles that brought us together under the umbrella of the WTO. A W TO anchored on the principles of non -discrimination, predictability, transparency, and, most importantly, the commitment to development. 17.12. The representative of Botswana provided the following statement: 17.13. My delegation aligns itself with the statement by Mauritius on behalf of the African Group, and expresses its support for the communication contained in WT/GC/W /825. The multilateral trading system is the collective responsibility of all countries who have a stake in it. Its underlying princi ples of non -discrimination, predictability, transparency, the tradition of decision -making by WT/GC/M/19 2 - 133 - consensus and, most importantly, the commitment to development, should remain our guiding compass. Of outmost importance to WTO Members in the new environment we find ourselves in , is the need to reflect on the role of the multilateral trading system in promoting economic recovery and in addressing the current and future health crisis. Multilateral cooperation and solidary is needed now more than ever to enable Mem bers to effectively respond to the crisis. 17.14. I think all Members can agree that the COVID -19 pandemic had a multifaceted impact on the global economy, our health systems and the financial standing of our governments. It has greatly turned the tides of our de velopment trajectory and threatens to reverse our development gains in ways we could never have anticipated , and is widely disproportionate especially in Africa. As WTO Members, we regularly repeat the mantra that we are a rules -based organi zation, but the continuing impasse in restoring a fully functional Appellate Body continues to negate this. We all know that a two-tier dispute settlement is essential in building confidence on the ability of the WTO to effectively resolve disputes between Members. The c ontinuing impasse has knock -on effects on the negotiating function of the WTO – as rules are only as good as we can enforce them. This impasse therefore needs to be resolved as a matter of priority. As one of the fundamental principles of the WTO, transpar ency must be central to the entire functioning of the WTO and negotiations must be open and inclusive, and take into consideration the resource constraints of developing countries. Let me reiterate that in order for our countries to build back better from the COVID -19 pandemic, we need multilateralism and mutually beneficial partnerships or cooperation, and a top priority being vaccine equity. The concentration of COVID -19 vaccines in a few parts of the world has relegated Africa to begging status, even whe re we have access to some resources to purchase. This will result in African countries being left behind while many nations are well into their recovery. At this rate, we will not be able to close the wide gaps in our levels of development, let alone achie ve the Sustainable Development Goals. The WTO has an important role to play in this regard. In conclusion, as a firm believer in multilateralism, Botswana stands ready to work with other members to strengthen the multilateral character of the WTO. 17.15. The representative of Cameroon provided the following statement: 17.16. We support the statement made by Mauritius and we also support the African position on this subject. Regarding the reform of this Organization, this proposal by the African Group indicates the principles on which this reform should be done. Of course, the rules of our organi zation would only work if inclusivity and transparency are included , so as to ensure a robust multilateral trading system enhancing the development of all parties. As indicat ed in the Preamble to the 1994 Marrakesh Agreement, international trade is based on states. Cameroon supports the African Group with the interest of building a multilateral trading system which is fair, includes the development needs of countries, gives pre-eminence to multilateral discussions, promotes transparency both in its procedures and in its discussions , and strengthens the belonging to the organi zation. The same goes for the dispute settlement system; it must be accessible to all parties. To this e nd, it is important to highlight that it is commonly agreed that the inclusive character of the dispute settlement system is not only appreciated at the level of rules and decisions , but also when looking at the accessibility to the system, be it at the fi rst stage or second stage of the procedure. That is why Cameroon supports the statement made by the African Group , which not only supports the functioning of the dispute settlement system but also supports the setting up of a fund. 17.17. The representative of Jamaica , on behalf of the ACP Group , provided the following statement: 17.18. This submission is not only timely but is relevant as WTO Members continue preparation in earnest for MC12. Like other areas of international cooperation, the multilateral trading s ystem faces challenges, but it remains an importan t pillar of the global architecture. If the multilateral trading system is to be effective in contributing to the growth and sustainable development of all its Members, especially the most vulnerable among us, it must be underpinned by the principles of non - discrimination, predictability, inclusivity, decision making by consensus, transparency and development -orientation. The ACP Group wholeheartedly supports the African Group 's view that decision by consens us must be the modus operandi in the WTO. In fact, this is a longstanding position of the ACP Group. Decision by consensus has played a critical role in the WTO in bringing balance to decision making and negotiated outcomes, catering especially for smaller economies with less capacity. Decision by consensus does not always deliver on legitimate expectations, as we have seen in the case of the impasse over the appointment of Appellate Body members, but it is the most durable solution in the interest of all W TO Members. We, therefore, jealously guard against any WT/GC/M/19 2 - 134 - attempt that may undermine this fundamental principle within the WTO. It is within this context that the ACP Group urges caution again st the current proliferation of plurilateral initiatives in the WTO . While we believe that plurilateralism is not new to the WTO, as witnessed with the Government Procurement Agreement, for example, we believe that plurilateral discussions should not undermine the coveted tradition and principle of multilateralism in the WTO. Additionally, any plurilateral outcome must be accepted by consensus by the WTO 's membership in accordance with Articles IX and X of the Marrakesh Agreement. 17.19. We align our sentiments to the African Group 's call for the restoration of the Appellate Bod y. Without adequate confidence that the dispute settlement system will be able to bind Members ' adherence to existing rules, we believe that it could affect negotiation of new ones. Our Ministers should be presented with a reform work programme to this eff ect at MC12. It is time to resolve the Appellate Body impasse. A two -tier, transparent, independent dispute settlement system, as envisaged by the DSU, is critical to the functioning and credibility of the WTO. The C OVID -19 pandemic has highlighted the int erconnectedness of our world , and while causing disruptions on several fronts has also presented an opportunity for us to demonstrate what can be achieved through shared collaboration. The global community is keenly observing the WTO and is expecting deliverables at MC12. As members of the WTO, we have the moral obligation to ensure the organization continues to perform its roles and responsibilities and it remains relevant and fit for purpose. The ACP Group thanks the African Group for its submission and e ncourages all WTO Members to have deeper engagement and discussion on this matter. 17.20. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 17.21. We thank the African Group for its submission, which spells out the fundamental principles of the Marrakesh Agreement and the rules of commitment at the WTO which must be maintained for the Ministerial Conference as well. If we go back to the recent history of the WTO, the Eleventh Ministerial Confere nce conveyed the feeling that the multilateral trading system could undergo a serious calling into question. There is a need to take into account the current realities. It is in this perspective that it is absolutely essential to take political and courage ous initiatives if we want to move forward and obtain results. The lack of this would run the risk of jeopardizing even more the resilience in the long term of the multilateral trading system. We would miss a precious opportunity of change in favour of the implementation of rules and principles , which are the very tenets of the WTO and the basis of the multilateral trading system. The LDC Group highlights the fundamental role of multilateral rules and regulations to ensure a stable and predictable framework for multilateral trade. It is in the interest of all – developed countries, developing countries and LDCs – to preserve the integrity and the advantages of the multilateral trading system and to reform what has to be reformed so as to strengthen even more the work and credibility of the World Trade Organization. There are challenges that we have to face. They are colossal. 17.22. But trade is not just a buying or selling system regulated through the WTO, it is also a means to an end. It is wise to ensure that tr ade can contribute to what we want first and foremost, that is to create an added value so as to improve the living standards of populations as mentioned by the Ambassador of Mauritius. This concerns especially the living standards of the weaker, more vulnerable and fragile populations. WTO Agreements include provisions aimed at increasing the trading possibilities of LDCs and also offer them flexibility so that they can implement WTO rules. To do so, it is fundamental to move on from reflecting to acting , and then reach convergence through a process which is open, inclusive, transparent, flexible and non -discriminatory. The common desire to safeguard and strengthen the multilateral trading system would ensure the participation of LDCs in international trade . The LDC Group wants a multilateral trading system which is fairer, more equitable and within which the LDCs will be able to evolve in a way to speed up their integration in international trade and ensure sustainable economic development. We have heard to day the statements made by different delegations including Brazil, the United States, China, the European Union and other groups. Everyone wants to achieve results by MC12 on important issues of the WTO. Given the current situation and context, we must and can collectively achieve something which will give greater credibility to the WTO. 17.23. The representative of Pakistan provided the following statement: 17.24. Pakistan is a strong believer of the proper functioning of the multilateral trading system, for the mutual benefit of the membership. We believe that the core principles of the Marrakesh Agreement should not only be preserved but they should be further str engthened. Some of these WT/GC/M/19 2 - 135 - principles that need to be highlighted and re -emphasized include: (i) Development, that must remain a fundamental pillar of the multilateral system. It should provide benefits to the membership across the board , particularly to the developing and least developed countries ; (ii) The principle of special and differential treatment should be preserved, as it is a treaty -embedded right of developing countries. This principle cannot be diluted to a case-by-case approach or made condition al upon other requirements. (iii) Existing inequities and injustices in the system, such as those in the Agreement on Agriculture, must be removed to level the playing field. (iv) The c onsensus -based decision -making principle must be absolutely upheld. Thi s includes continuing discussions at multilateral, mandated forums. (v) The Appellate Body crisis must be resolved to ensure justice and to uphold the trust and credibility of the WTO. The credibility and continued relevance of the multilateral trading sys tem will depend on its ability to adapt itself to the changing realities and dynamics of the globe, such as the COVID -19 pandemic and climate change, in order to uphold these principles. Any failure to do so will be detrimental not only for the organizatio n but also for the greater public good. Pakistan therefore supports this call by the African group and will continue to engage constructively to achieve these objectives. 17.25. The representative of the European Union provided the following statement: 17.26. The E uropean Union welcomes this constructive contribution of the African Group, pointing to the particularly negative impact the COVID -19 pandemic has had on developing countries. Furthermore, the European Union also agrees with the necessity that the global t rading system and therefore the WTO increase its capacity to promote resilience, preparedness and effective response to common challenges, including future pandemics. We believe that for this to happen, WTO Members should come together at MC12 to launch wo rk on institutional reform of the organization, addressing all three of its core functions – rulemaking, dispute settlement and monitoring/deliberation. We welcome a constructive dialogue with the African Group in this regard. At the same time, the Europea n Union is committed to preserving the core tenets upon which the WTO has been built, and agree that aiding development and effectively integrating developing countries into global trade needs to remain at the core of WTO action. We agree that special and differentiated treatment is important for many WTO Members. It is our priority to ensure effective, precise and operational special and differential treatment in the WTO in order to enable these Members to apply and benefit from the Agreements. The Europea n Union will continue to support constructive initiatives to strengthen the WTO and support developing countries to better integrate Members with capacity constraints into the multilateral trading system. We would like to thank the African Group for their contribution in this matter. 17.27. The representative of China provided the following statement: 17.28. Let me start by thanking the African Group for their submission of this proposal. China recognizes the enormous challenges and high vulnerability faced by developin g Members, especially LDCs during the global pandemic period. The multilateral trading system is a key tool in addressing this common challenge and the current widening inequity in the trading system. To this end, Members should strengthen solidarity, enha nce mutual trust and cooperation. The key principles of the multilateral trading system should be preserved. Decision -making by consensus must also be upheld. We also share the view in the proposal that the proper functioning of a two -tier dispute settleme nt system should remain as the top priority for the WTO. The rules -based multilateral trading system must be more inclusive, with development at its core, by providing sufficient flexibilities and strengthening technical assistance and capacity building fo r developing members to be effectively integrated into global trade. S pecial and differential treatment is an integral part of the multilateral trading system. We also encourage Members ' full engagement in the discussions on special and differential treatm ent provisions to make them more precise, effective and operational. In the current pandemic, it is urgent for the WTO to ensure fair access to vaccines and related goods for developing Members. MC12 provides us with an invaluable opportunity to strengthen ing the multilateral character of the WTO by delivering concrete and meaningful outcomes. 17.29. The representative of India provided the following statement: 17.30. It is heartening to see that 3 agenda items relating to the centrality of the multilateral trading system have been brought forward in today 's deliberations, agenda items 14, 16 and this one. We share the core objectives stated by Mauritius on behalf of African Group, namely, the preservation of the multilateral character of the WTO, the core pr inciples of the Marrakesh Agreement, including special and differential treatment , the need for policy space for developing and LDC Members to reap WT/GC/M/19 2 - 136 - the full benefits of trade, the need for negotiated outcomes of the WTO to be fair and balanced, the need fo r WTO Members to share common and differentiated responsibilities, the immediate restoration of the two -tier dispute settlement system and the development objective underpinning the multilateral trading system. 17.31. As mentioned in our intervention under agenda item 14, recognizing the problems created by the fragmented system of trade rules, WTO Members sought an end to this problem. This has been clearly articulated in the following recitals of the Preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement : "[r]esolved, therefore, to develop an integrated, more viable and durable multilateral trading system (…)" and "[d]etermined to preserve the basic principles and to further the objectives underlying this multilateral trading system. " Going back to plurilateral agreements would, therefore, be a step in the wrong direction and would be contrary to the determination and resolve, as enshrined in the Preamble of the Marrakesh Agreement. My delegation therefore supports the call by the Afri can Union and many other Members to strengthen the multilateral character of the World Trade Organization in all its activities, starting from agenda setting, negotiations and finalization and adoption of new rules, to achieve inclusive development -oriente d balanced outcomes, in line with the principles enshrined in the preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement, including "raising standards of living and ensuring full employment " and the "need for positive efforts designed to ensure that developing countries, and especially the least developed among them, secure a share in the growth in international trade commensurate with the needs of their economic development ". 17.32. The representative of Central African Republic provided the following statement: 17.33. This presentation recalls the multilateral trading system's limited capacity to overcome the significant challenges of our time in the light of the goal that our organization has set itself since it was established. These challenges create uncertainty as regards the future of the WTO as a forum for negotiations. We must, as a matter of urgency, make a bold decision to move away from an attitude based on defending our own trade interests to a common vision for moving forward together in a progressive and tangible manner towa rds achieving the WTO's goals and making the WTO a setting in which all Members, particularly developing countries and least developed countries, are able to find their place and increase their participation. We support this declaration and call on Members to take note of the WTO's current poor capacity for resilience and to commit to reforming our multilateral trading system. The Twelfth Ministerial Conference should be an opportunity to establish a working group tasked with assessing the WTO's ability to discharge its duties and proposing an adapted framework that offers all Members equal opportunities to succeed and the means to participate effectively in international trade. 17.34. The representative of Kenya provided the following statement: 17.35. The WTO was established against the backdrop of multilateralism, and in the words of the Preamble of the Marrakesh Agreement, the Members re solved to develop an integrated, more viable and durable multilateral trading system. The WTO should therefore continue to play its envisaged role of not only providing a forum for negotiation of multilateral trade agreements, but should also ensure that d eveloping countries and LDCs secure a share in the growth of international trade. The WTO also ought to contribute solutions to the challenges of globalization and be a real means to growth and sustainable development. International trade should be a means for promotion of global partnerships for sustainable development and the implementation of the SDGs. It is for these reasons that we support the upholding of the founding objectives of the WTO as highlighted in the paper by the African Group. 17.36. The representative of the Philippines provided the following statement: 17.37. The Philippines agrees with the elements contained in paragraph 7 of the proposal, particularly on the importance of restoring the two -tier dispute settlement system. This is indeed an important contribution of the African Group. It provides principles, alongside other initiatives mentioned today, and will certainly serve as a good foundation for a substantive MC12 outcome. We look forward to further engagement with the African Group and other Members in the coming work ahead towards MC12. 17.38. The representative of Sri Lanka provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 137 - 17.39. We value the contribution made by the African Group to this body. Though they are marginalized due to their inherent low level of deve lopment in many countries in the African region, it has always contributed significantly to enshrine and preserve the multilateral character of this institution. Today, we listened to many Members say that the Doha Agenda is dead and that the Doha Round is at an impasse. If we look at the past trade rounds, there had always been such failures. Fortunately, due to the far -reaching thinking of the trade negotiators, such setbacks have been overcome and the rounds have been brough t back on track with the affir mative reiteration of the key principles of the multilateral trading system. In light of that, we recognize that the proposal enshrines all those key principles. Looking at the debate today, the African Group proposal reminds us why we are here and why we really need to look at the WTO as an institution which promotes development rather than only a rule -making institution , particularly we need policy space for development. We hope this proposal will be supported by as many Members as possible. Eventually, we wish to see some of these elements in a Ministerial Declaration, to remind all of us as to why we are here. This proposal captures all those principles. 17.40. The representative of South Africa provided the following statement: 17.41. South Africa supports the statement delivered by Mauritius on behalf of the Africa n Group on the communication contained in WT/GC/825 and Jamaica on behalf of the ACP. COVID -19 has reminded us of the importance of multilateralism as no country will be able to respond to the pandemic on its own. The magnitude of the current crisis has resulted in an enormous setback to recent development gains, including the SDGs. The COVID -19 vaccine inequity is resulting in a two - track economic recovery process with a disp roportionate impact on Africa given the region's limited policy space. We have seen in the context of the current pandemic that an effective response requires a coordinated multilateral response and global solidarity. The submission by the Africa n Group th erefore highlights the need to preserve multilateralism and the multilateral character of the WTO. The credibility and continued relevance of the multilateral trading system is premised on mutual benefit from the system, as perceived by its Members, mutual trust and responsiveness to core challenges facing humanity , as well as its ability to address the existing imbalances in WTO Agreements , that continue to hamper the effective participation of developing countries in global trade and which is key to build resilience. The WTO is about people and it should prioritize the goals and principles that are set out in the Marrakesh Agreement , which recognizes that international trade is not an end in itself, but a means towards "raising standards of living and ensu ring full employment ". We share the view that WTO Members should strongly support the multilateral trading system and seek to strengthen the WTO. This necessitates respecting the rules and mandates, especially those that are critical to the effective integ ration of developing countries in global trade. 17.42. When the DDA was launched, it heralded hope that the WTO would deliver on development and issues of importance to developing countries. The long -outstanding issues that are critical to developing countries a re now all the more urgent. Failure to deliver on these issues will result in an increasing backlash against trade , especially in the context of the pandemic. It is in this regard that the Africa Group calls for development to remain at the centre of the M TS. On issues of sustainability , common but differentiated responsibility should be the underpinning principle. Thus, building back better post this pandemic should be about re -anchoring ourselves on the principle of trade as not an end in itself, but a me ans towards uplifting the poor from poverty and underdevelopment and towards sustainable integration in the international trading system. This should be given expression in the negotiating outcomes that we strive for in the various areas by ensuring effect ive special and differential treatment and balanced, fair and equitable outcomes. Special and differential treatment must therefore be embedded in the trade rules. In promoting multilateralism, we also have to be mindful that the WTO consists of Members at different levels of development. The Marrakesh Agreement states that "there is a need for positive efforts designed to ensure that developing countries, and especially the least developed among them, secure a share in the growth in international trade com mensurate with the needs of their economic development. " The multilateral trading system is a collective responsibility , and all WTO Members have a stake in it. The principles of non -discrimination, predictability, transparency, and, most importantly, the commitment to development, must continue to underpin the multilateral trading system. 17.43. The representative of Côte d'Ivoire provided the following statement: 17.44. This communication is relevant on more than one level and comes at an appropriate time in the context of preparing for MC12. This communication, from our point of view, grants the ability for the Organization to look at resuming the vocation of the WTO as a multilateral organi zation. The WT/GC/M/19 2 - 138 - WTO must, through the governance of global trade, contribute to development for all, especially developing countries and LDCs. We are talking about placing the WTO at the very centre of development. All the aspects underlined in this communication have one single aim: for the WTO to play its role. From t his point of view, this communication should enjoy favour from all Members because many Members think of the WTO as a symbol of development. We support this communication and ask that Members take note of the relevant elements which have been underlined wi thin it. 17.45. The representative of Tanzania provided the following statement: 17.46. I would like to align myself to the statement of the African Group and support the communication of the African Group. The founding and guiding principles that have built the WTO are what have made this organization highly respected over the years. Some of the key principles include its inclusivity in decision -making processes through consensus, the binding nature of its decisions, the enforcement of its agreements through dispute settlement mechanism, special and differential treatment based on the development levels of Members, the non-discrimination principle, predictability, transparency through notifications and many other procedural issues elaborated in respective WTO Agreements. However, in recent years, some of these principles are slowly being eroded and undermined under the disguise of reform. This is highly concerning, particularly for weaker Members, of whi ch its continuation will further weaken the image and the relevance of the Organization in the long -run. The African Group communication should be a wake -up call and a reminder for Members to uphold key principles and procedures which have built the Organization. The WTO is irreplaceable , we cannot envisage another organization that could possibly take its position or place and earn our full trust. That being said , we ought to strengthen trust and cooperation among Members to ensure a strong functioning WTO . Moreover, it is important we recogni ze and acknowledge that Members are at different levels of development, and it is crucial that the WTO continues to take into account the development needs of weaker Members with a view to minimise existing inequalities and gaps. 17.47. The representative of Uganda provided the followin g statement: 17.48. We have asked these questions before and continue to ask them: What is the place of the WTO in development? How have multilateral systems/rules aided or stampeded structural transformation and industrialization for Members? How do the trade d istorting domestic supports employed by some major economies fit into the free trade narrative espoused by some Members? What should be of paramount importance in the political economy of a country? Should it be multilateral institutions or the needs and i nterests of a country? Would the WTO exist without the support of its Members? Can we write new rules when the decisions made by our Ministers and the General Council are not implemented? Should we write new rules when the enforcement mechanism of the organization is in dispute? The multilateral character of the WTO requires that every Member brings to the fore the best it has to offer in terms of compromise for the common good, it requires that Members stay the course because the benefit ultimately is mean ingful for all , especially the most disadvantaged . It also requires that every Member plays a role in decision -making because the decisions made have a real impact on the lives of ordinary people. As such, the consensus principle of decision -making must be especially guarded by all and in all circumstances. 17.49. The representative of Mauritius provided the following statement: 17.50. I have listened carefully to all the statements made and I think that what we heard was everything from wholehearted support , to welcoming a constructive proposal from us. I have not heard any delegation say "no", perhaps some nuances were expressed. Generally, we hope that this paper can find its way to the Ministerial Declaration and to the elements paper that the Chair is putting up for us to consider. I thank all delegations who have taken the floor today . I am very impressed that we are engaged in substantive discussions and proposals . I thank the commitment of the WTO to move forward and to recognize the importance of the multi lateral trading system. 17.51. The General Council took note of the statements. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 139 - 18 WAIVERS UNDER ARTICLE IX OF THE WTO AGREEMENT 18.1 European Union – Application of Autonomous Preferential Treatment to the Western Balkans – Extension of Waiver – Draft Decision (G/C/W/794) 18.1. The Chair recalled that the item on the draft waiver on "European Union – Request for a Waiver Extension – Application of Autonomous Preferential Treatment to the Western Balkans" in document G/C/W/794 had be taken up for consideration by the C ouncil for Trade in Goods at its July meeting. On behalf of Ambassador Lundeg P urevsuren (Mongolia), Chai r of the Goods Council, he report ed that the CTG had considered the waiver request at its July meeting and had agreed to forward it to the General Council for adoption. 18.2. The representative of European Union provided the following statement: 18.3. We wish to thank all Members for the support they have shown regarding the extension of this waiver. 18.4. The Chair noted that u nless delegations wish ed to comment, he would propose that the General Council adopt the draft Decision in G/C/W/794 which relate d to the "European Union – Request for a Waiver Extension – Application of Autonomous Preferential Treatment to the Western Balkans". 18.5. The General Council so agree d18. 18.2 Review of Waivers Pursuant to Article I X:4 of the WTO Agreement 18.2.1 Least -Developed Country M embers – Obligations under Article 70.8 and Article 70.9 of the TRIPS Agreement with respect to Pharmaceutical Products, granted on 30 November 2015 until 1 January 2033 (WT/L/971) 18.2.2 Kimberley Process Certification Scheme for Rough Diamonds, granted on 26 July 2018 through 31 December 2024 (WT/L/1039) 18.2.3 Canada – CARIBCAN, granted on 28 July 2015 until 31 December 2023 (WT/L/958, WT/L/1112) 18.6. The Chair referred to the review of waivers in sub -item (b), in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article IX of the WTO Agreement, that "any waiver granted for a period of more than one year shall be reviewed by the Ministerial Conference not later than one year after it is granted, and thereafter annually until the waiver terminates." There were three waivers before the Ge neral Council for review, and they were listed in the proposed Agenda. 18.7. The Chair stress ed that th ose waivers ha d already been agreed to by the General Council and that they were in force. The General Council was not expected to take any new decision on th eir renewal or otherwise at th e meeting. 18.8. One of the waivers under review provide d that an annual report should be submitted by the Member concerned regarding the operation or implementation of th e waiver with a view to facilitating its annual review by th e General Council. The report from Canada ha d been circulated in document WT/L/1112. 18.9. The representative of Canada provided the following statement: 18.10. Recognizing the special relationship between Canada and the Commonwealth Caribbean, in 1986 CARIBCAN was established to help improve the trade and economic development prospects of the region. In light of the continuing relevance of the considerations unde rlying CARIBCAN, the initiative's objectives, scope and coverage remain unchanged. Canada thanks those Members that have expressed support for the CARIBCAN program and the associated WTO waiver. 18 The Decision was subsequently circulated in WT/L/1114. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 140 - 18.11. The representative of Jamaica , provided the following stateme nt: 18.12. We wish to make a brief statement in Jamaica's national capacity on Agenda item 18.2.3 on the Canada – CARIBCAN waiver. We wish to thank Canada for its report and statement. We continue to appreciate this key trade instrument. As we have often said, 9 7% of Jamaica's products to Canada are granted duty -free access within this framework. A significant portion of that go es to businesses and mechanisms under MSMEs, many of which are owned by women and youth. We continue to appreciate Canada in this regard, having been a longstanding strategic partner with Jamaica, with a beneficial cooperation in a wide range of important areas including trade. As we move into a fourth pandemic economic recovery mode, Jamaica sees mechanisms such as CARIBCAN playing a criti cal role, and this may include further expansion in trade in goods and services as well as increased investment opportunities with Canada. Jamaica wishes to reaffirm its sincere gratitude to Canada for maintaining the CARIBCAN mechanism , which we view as a clear demonstration of its commitment to a partnership for trade and development with its Caribbean neighbours. We align ourselves with the statement to be made by Saint Lucia on behalf of CARICOM. 18.13. The representative of Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group , provided the following statement: 18.14. The LDC Group supports this waiver and notes that its importance is ever greater given the pandemic. The measures that are in place should be recogni zed in all of the responses to the COVID - 19 pandemic. 18.15. The representative of Saint Lucia , on behalf of CARICOM , provided the following statement: 18.16. I am making this statement on behalf of the CARICOM Group. At the outset, we thank Canada for its submission contained in document WT/L/1112. While CARIBCAN was concept ualized in 1985 and enacted the following year, the constructive relationship between CARICOM countries and Canada goes back many decades before. We are grateful that this relationship still endures. Preferential access to the Canadian market, whether unde r CARIBCAN or the General Preferential Tariff (GPT) remains extremely important for CARICOM countries. This preferential access directly and indirectly supports jobs, including for MSMEs and women entrepreneurs, foreign exchange earnings and our further in tegration into the global economy. Our Member States are working feverishly to boost productive capacity and pursue economic diversification to trade and take greater advantage of preferential access in important partner markets such as Canada. The near 10 % drop in exports from CARIBCAN beneficiary countries to Canada in 2020 , also demonstrates the impact of the COVID -19 pandemic on our economies and further highlight our immense vulnerability to exogenous shocks, thereby reinforcing the need for us to boos t economic resilience post -pandemic. Finally, Mr. Chairman, permit us again to thank the Permanent Delegation of Canada for its report. 18.17. The General Council took note of the report contained in documents WT/L/1112, and of the statements . 19 COMMITTEE ON BUDGET , FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION – REPORTS ON THE MEETINGS OF APRIL, MAY, JUNE AND JULY 2021 (WT/BFA/194, WT/BFA/195, WT/BFA/196) 19.1. The Chair drew attention to the reports from the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration in WT/BFA/194, 195, and 196. 19.2. Ambassador Bettina WALDMANN (Germany), Chair of the CBFA provided the following statement: 19.3. Since my last report to the General Council, the C ommittee has meet on several occasions. In my remarks today, I will provide some highlights of the formal meetings of the Committee that took place on 25 May, 22 June, 1 July, and 12 July 2021. The reports of those meetings are contained in documents WT/BF A/194, WT/BFA/195, and WT/BFA/196. 19.4. My key priority is to ensure the timely passage of the 2022 -2023 WTO and ITC budget proposals. The WTO and ITC budget proposals were both formally presented to the Committee on 22 June 2021. Both continue to be under consideration by the Committee. The goa l is to ensure WT/GC/M/19 2 - 141 - adequate time, for in -depth deliberations and to make a recommendation for approval before the end of the year. 19.5. At the meeting of the CBFA held on 12 July, Members considered the 2020 WTO Financial Performance Report, which comprises of the budgetary performance, trust fund performance and financial statements. I am pleased to report that the Independent External Auditors have placed an unqualified audit opinion on the WTO's Financial Statements for 2020. This means that, in the External Audi tors' opinion, the Financial Statements prepared by the Secretariat give a "true and fair view" of the financial performance and financial position of the organization and comply with applicable international accounting principles. 19.6. However, the Committee h as not yet endorsed that report or the Financial Statements for 2020. Another matter that continues to be under consideration by the Committee relates to proposed utilization of the 2020 Budgetary Surplus, of approximately CHF 11.7 million. 19.7. Still on the q uestion of the WTO's financial performance, and looking ahead, let me draw your attention to the long -term pension and after service health insurance liabilities of the organization which are very significant, and increasing. Taking adjustments for these l ong-term liabilities into account the overall financial result obtained in 2020 is a deficit of CHF 37.1 million, even though the annual budgetary result is positive. 19.8. This topic is of key interest and came up during several Committee meetings in the previo us year. Further discussions are continuing in a small group process, open to all delegations. As mentioned at the last General Council meeting, Alicia Goujon, from Mexico, is helping me lead that process. Discussions have been constructive, and the target is to agree to the text of a progress report by 30 July, and to submit recommendations to the CBFA in October. 19.9. At the meeting of the CBFA held on 1st July, Members discussed document WT/BFA/W/559 regarding a request by the Secretariat for the endorsement of the revisions to Financial Regulations 4, 17, 26, 27, 29, 37, 38 and 42 that were agreed in 2019. That document envisions that a complete set of the revised Financial Regulations that could be tabled for approval by the General Council in October 2021. At the meeting of the CBFA held on 12 July, I summed up my understanding, that there is no disagreement with respect to the revisions to these Financial Regulations 4, 17, 26, 27, 29, 37, 38 and 42 set out in document WT/BFA/W/568. 19.10. Furthermore, consultati ons are ongoing among Members on Financial Regulation 19 (regarding voluntary contributions to the WTO and trust funds). If agreement is reached on the revisions, Financial Regulation 19 could be included in the package of Financial Regulations that I hope can be endorsed by the CBFA and presented to the General Council for approval in October. 19.11. There is also the question of a possible revision to Financial Regulation 23 (which concerns use of any budgetary surpluses) and a revision to Financial Regulation 6 or 10 (regarding the continuity of operations pending approval of a budget). It is my impression however, that discussion regarding those revisions may require more time. I have encouraged Members to show flexibility and will provide you with updates. 19.12. I would be remiss if I did not mention the issue of the structural review, as this is one of the key issues going forward for both the WTO and for Members. Members had an opportunity to meet with the external consultants, McKinsey, earlier this month, to pro vide thoughts and share insights. The McKinsey report will most likely be presented to the DG in early August. I am grateful to the DG and to DDG Ellard for encouraging Members to engage in the structural review, as well as the DG's and the DDG's commitmen t to a full and transparent discussion with Members regarding next steps. I would also like to express appreciation to DDG Ellard for her updates to Members regarding this matter, including recently, at the 12 July CBFA. 19.13. The representative of India provide d the following statement: 19.14. We wish to draw to Members ' attention an important issue emanating from those meetings. During the financial year 2020, the WTO has accumulated a surplus of CHF 11,771,979. The DG has proposed that an amount of CHF 9.8 million (amounting to 5% of the WTO budget) be adjusted against the Member contributions for 2022. India supports this proposal by the Director General to WT/GC/M/19 2 - 142 - pass on the savings realized during 2020 to the Members , by way of their reduced contributions for the next year. This proposal is in line with India' s suggestion made at the October 2020 General Council meeting last year for a voluntary cut in WTO 's budget in solidarity with Members battling the grave economi c situation due to the ongoing pandemic. The proposal by the Secretariat to pass on part of the 2020 savings to Members is a win -win for everyone. These saving were realized without the Secretariat having to cut -corners last year and its operations were no t impacted. Passing on that benefit to Members to reduce their burden, even if it 's not significant, sends a positive message to the membership and to the world that the WTO is sensitive to the Members ' current economic situation brought on by the pandemic . Particularly looking at the drop in GDP and revenue of respective countries, and an increase in debt and depreciation of currency, thereby resulting in higher contribution to the WTO in terms of local currency. This is precisely what our intention was when we made the proposal last year. The WTO certainly deserves credit for this gesture. I take this opportunity to complement the DG for the proposal and call upon all Members to support it whole heartedly. 19.15. The General Council took note of Ambassador Waldm ann's statement and of the other statement made and adopt ed the reports in WT/BFA/194, 195 and 196. 20 WTO PENSION PLAN 20.1 Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ending 31 December 2020 (WT/L/1111) 20.2 Report of the Independent External Auditor on the A udit of the Financial Statements of the World Trade Organization Pension Plan (WTOPP) for the Year Ended 31 December 2020 (WT/L/1113 AND WT/L/1113/CORR.1) 20.1. The Chair drew attention to the Annual Report of the Management Board for 2020 contained in document WT/L/1111, which was submitted to the General Council in accordance with Article 5(d) of the Regulations of the WTO Pension Plan. He also draw attention to the Report o f the Independent External Auditor on the Audit of the Financial Statements of the WTOPP in document WT/L/1113 and WT/L/1113/Corr.1. 20.2. Mr. Jean -Marc Van Dril (Switzerland), Chair of the Management Board , provided the following statement: 20.3. I am pleased to pre sent to the General Council the 2020 Report of the External Auditor and the 2020 Annual Report of the WTO Pension Plan, which can be found under the document numbers WT/L/1113 and WT/L/1111. These reports, covering the period from 1st January to 31 Decembe r 2020, have been prepared in accordance with Article 5 of the Regulations of the Plan for presentation to the General Council and to the Pension Plan participants. 20.4. On the Report of the external auditor: while accepting the 2020 financial statements with a n unqualified opinion, the new External Auditors issued a recommendation to adopt an external accounting standard for the preparation of the Pension Plan accounts starting from 2021. This will be looked into by the Management Board in the next months. 20.5. Turning to the 2020 Annual report, the spread of Covid -19 has created sharp movements in financial markets in the first quarter of the year. Nonetheless, the Pension Plan’s investment strategy delivered a nominal rate of return of 4.2% at end -2020, which is ab ove the 3.5% target rate of return used in the actuarial assumptions. Over the last five years, the Plan's portfolio generated an average annual nominal return of +5.4%. Let me here underline that variations in returns are normal, with years above and year s below the target. Despite the good performances in 2020, the uncertainty introduced by the C OVID -19 pandemic means the prospects for investors are likely to remain challenging in the near future. In any case, following a few years of above average return s, it will be normal to expect that markets might correct and that the Plan experiences some below average returns in the future. However, the WTO Pension Plan is a long -term investor. Its strategy is designed to make use of the opportunities provided by m arket downturns, by purchasing at attractive prices assets that hold the potential for more sustained, even if modest, returns. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 143 - 20.6. Regarding the actuarial matters, the process of completing the full actuarial valuation based on end -2019 data has been interru pted in late summer 2020. The reason for this was the sudden decision by the actuarial company (Mercer) to make the Plan's leading Consulting Actuary redundant. Consequently, the Management Board launched in late 2020 a competitive procurement exercise for a new Consulting Actuary. The recruitment process has been completed in the first half of 2021. The actuarial valuation is now under way and will be presented by the end of the year, based on new actuarial assumptions that adequately reflect current antic ipations about the future of the Plan. As mentioned earlier, near term economic conditions are expected to be challenging, a situation that can result in sustained below -average returns. Combined with unprecedentedly low (and even negative) interest rates and shifting staff demographics, we anticipate identifying an actuarial imbalance. The Management Board will be closely monitoring these trends and - when necessary – will be making recommendations to address such an imbalance. 20.7. In 2020, the Management Boar d made important investment decisions that included: (i) revising the Plan's strategic asset allocation to include 50% equities, 30% fixed -income and 20% real estate investments; (ii) changing three investment vehicles; (iii) and introducing an additional rule for rebalancing. These decisions were followed by revising the Plan's Investment Guidelines accordingly. During the summer of 2020, a full renewal of Board membership was completed for a new three -years term ending in July 2023. Let me underline that the Management Board remains committed to full engagement in ensuring the continued good governance of the WTO Pension Plan and its long -term sustainability. I would like to conclude by acknowledging the excellent work of the Plan's Secretary and its team, ensuring the daily operations of the plans and providing the necessary support for the Board to perform its duties. 20.8. The General Council took note of the Annual Report in document WT/L/1111, and of the Report in document WT/L/1113 and Corrigendum 1. 21 CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT – AUSTRALIA; CANADA; THE EUROPEAN UNION; JAPAN; NEW ZEALAND; THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU; UNITED KINGDOM; AND THE UNITED STATES 21.1. The Chair noted that the item had been added at the request of the delegation of Japan on behalf of a number of Members as indicated in the agenda. 21.2. The representative of the United Kingdom provided the following statement: 21.3. As the representative of the United Kingdom, I am delivering this statement on behalf of the following Members: Australia, Canada, the European Union, Iceland, Japan, Montenegro, New Zealand, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Mats u (Chinese Taipei), the United Kingdom, and the United States. The GPA Committee started the selection process for the next Chair in January this year. As Members will recall, the GPA Committee is currently composed of twenty -one Parties. The Chair of the GPA Committee is to be selected only by these Parties. That Chair has a duty to act in an entirely impartial manner. Accession candidates or Observers are not entitled to participate in any decision -making process of the Committee. Under that selection process, two candidates were nominated by GPA Parties, one from the Chinese Taipei and the other from the European Union. We recall that Chinese Taipei, like all other WTO Members, retains all benefits and obligations associated with WTO Membership, including the right to chair WTO Committees. During the consultative meetings held by the outgoing GPA Chair and GPA Parties, a significant majority of the Parties expressed a preference for the candidate from Chinese Taipei. We, as GPA Parties, take this opportuni ty to underline our full confidence in that process, which we believe was run with integrity. Therefore, with respect to the long -established convention across this organization, on 25 May, the European Union withdrew the candidate from Poland from the Cha ir selection process. This left Chinese Taipei's candidate as the only remaining candidate. In an effort to appoint the candidate from Chinese Taipei as the Committee's next Chair, GPA Parties met for an informal consultative meeting on 28 May, a formal me eting on 2 June, and then most recently, an ad hoc formal meeting on 16 July. The outgoing Chair departed from Geneva on 21 July. Despite the fact that there was only one candidate for the position, Hong Kong, China intervened, on each occasion, to block c onsensus on appointing the next Chair of the GPA Committee. Furthermore, as reflected in the Minutes of the GPA Committee's formal meeting on 2 June - where Hong Kong, China continued to block consensus - China, a GPA observer, made an intervention on the agenda item of chair selection, stating that "China hopes that the chair selected by the GPA Parties would play a WT/GC/M/19 2 - 144 - positive role in China's accession to the GPA," and that the chair selected by the Parties would "not cause unnecessarily negative impact on C hina's accession to the GPA." 21.4. We, in our capacities as both WTO Members and GPA Parties, would again recall the long - established tradition of Chairs across this House acting with full impartiality. Against that context, and, given the statements made in C ommittee – combined with the nature and sequence of these events, and concerns about China's approach to Chinese Taipei chairing WTO bodies - a number of GPA Parties are deeply concerned that the GPA Committee's functioning is being undermined. We would li ke to again reiterate that a non -Party, including GPA accession candidates and GPA observers, is not entitled to participate in the GPA Committee's decision -making process. In order to avoid further disruption to the Committee's work and schedule we, as ex isting GPA Parties, believe that all GPA Parties should come together to ensure a smooth transition of the chairmanship. We urge Hong Kong, China – a WTO Member, and GPA Party that we consider has long played a central and constructive role in the GPA Comm ittee, including as one of the first ever Committee Chairs - to reconsider its position. We urge Hong Kong, China to join consensus to appoint the only remaining candidate as the next Chair of the GPA Committee. 21.5. The representative of Switzerland provided the following statement: 21.6. Switzerland is disappointed that a party to the Agreement on Government Procurement cannot join the consensus on the successful candidate for the position of Chair of the GPA Committee. The selection process was conducte d in a proper manner and the current situation sets an unfortunate precedent in the functioning of the Committee. Switzerland has taken good note of the concerns expressed by one party to the GPA. However, we would like to stress our full confidence in the ability of the selected candidate to perform this function with diligence and impartiality. Furthermore, moving the accession processes forward is first and foremost a matter of commitment by the acceding Members and the parties to the Agreement. We note that, as with other WTO Committees, the Chairmanship is renewed annually. The parties to the GPA therefore have the possibility, after one year, not to renew the Chair's mandate if she does not fulfil her responsibilities in a satisfactory manner. Switzerl and would therefore like to invite the party to the GPA opposing the consensus to take this into consideration and to reassess the situation. We hope that a consensus can be reached as soon as possible in order to ensure the proper functioning of this Comm ittee. 21.7. The representative of China provided the following statement: 21.8. I am a little surprise d that the GPA Chair selection issue has been raised separately on the agenda. We see the problems in the recent years ' WTO Chair selection processes and are open to discuss , but before new rules are reached, it is important for us to follow the existing guidelines and practices. We had difficult situations before, such as the C hair selection of the Negotiating Group of Rules a couple of years ago and the Working Party on GATS Rules in 2020. With the relevant practices and guidelines, and Members ' flexibilit y, they were all well addressed. Among them, Members ' goodwill, flexibilit y and respect of other WTO Members ' sensitivities are the most important. 21.9. Regarding the specific issue of the GPA Chair selection, I would like to take this opportunity to underscore the following points. First, as a plurilateral agreement under the WTO framework, the GPA Chair is selected only by GPA Parties. China, as an observer to the GPA, fully respects the GPA Chair selection process and outcome and has no intention to interfere. Second, any Member, including China, has the right to express its concern and sensitivities. Among those practices and guidelines regarding the C hair select ion of WTO bodies, one guiding principle is to respect Members ' sensitivities. Though the GPA Committee is a plurilateral agreement committee, it is still under the WTO framework. If any decision made in the GPA will have spill overs on non -parties ' sensit ivities, the GPA Parties should also follow the above -mentioned guidelines and give attention and respect on such sensitivities of non -Parties. 21.10. We regret that the GPA Committee has not been able to select a new Chair. We noted that in order to solve the GPA Chair selection impasse, one GPA party has already submitted two specific proposals trying to find a solution and other parties have also actively coordinated among Parties to seek a way out. We appreciate the great efforts made by those Parties. As Chi na is at a critical stage of joining the GPA, we hope that all GPA parties could demonstrate flexibility, seek a solution in a pragmatic manner and solve the Chair selection impasse as soon as possible through consensus, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 145 - with the aim of ensuring the proper functioning of the GPA and promoting the accession of other Members, including China, to the GPA. 21.11. The representative of Israel provided the following statement: 21.12. First, I would like to express our appreciation to the Chair of the GPA Committee for facilitating the selection process of the next Chair and for his extensive efforts to help find a qualified person to succeed him. Israel regrets that the Committee was n ot able to reach a consensus on the next GPA Chair, although it had conducted a complete consultative process which was supported by almost all Members. Israel attaches great importance to the GPA and believes it is imperative for all GPA Parties to select a Chair as soon as possible by consensus. 21.13. The representative of Hong Kong, China provided the following statement: 21.14. I would thank the United Kingdom and other proponents of this agenda item for sharing with us their observations and views relating to the matter of chairmanship of the Committee on Government Procurement. Early this year, when we learned that there is a need to select a new CGP Chair because the then incumbent Chair was leaving Geneva this summer, I personally met with the two candidates to discuss their candidacies. After thorough internal deliberations, Hong Kong, China informed the Committee Chair during the first round of consultations that we would only support the EU candidate as the next Chair and would object to the Chinese Taipei can didate. Although the EU candidate subsequently withdrew from the race, we informed the Chair before the informal consultative meeting held in late May that we were unable to join any consensus to designate the Chinese Taipei candidate as the next Committee Chair. We have explained to all GPA Parties at a formal CGP meeting in June that Hong Kong, China's position was formulated with the WTO's broader interests in mind. 21.15. Let me explain. The Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) is a plurilateral agreemen t. Hong Kong, China, as a GPA Party, has all along been actively engaged in the businesses of the CGP and always has the best interests of the GPA at heart. Hong Kong, China does not support designating the Chinese Taipei candidate as the next Committee Ch air because we believe this proposal will not be conducive to advancing the various work programmes of the CGP and the accession of new GPA Parties. GPA Parties may recall that this is not the first time Hong Kong, China does not follow the herd. A few yea rs ago, when a Member had to seek a separate membership in the GPA as it was leaving a regional trade group, Hong Kong, China was the first to lend our strong support to that Member, notwithstanding the different views held by some other GPA parties. Back then as in the present case, Hong Kong, China's position is formulated based on our strong belief that smooth and early accession of interested economies, big or small, is in line with the interests of all existing and potential GPA Parties. 21.16. There is also a broader consideration – we note there has been a much better working environment in the WTO since the appointment of the new Director -General early this year, and Members have been working earnestly on various fronts since then to pursue progress and deliverables by MC12. We strongly believe that we should strive to avoid introducing further divisions and unnecessary conflicts among Members at this critical time, which would inevitably distract us from our on -going efforts in the WTO. In the spirit of co nstructive engagement, Hong Kong, China has suggested to other GPA Parties earlier this month that we should try to identify another candidate on whom a consensus can be forged as the next Committee Chair, and invite the Deputy Director - General or the Divi sion Director responsible for government procurement matters to stand in as an interim arrangement until the next Committee Chair is designated. Unfortunately, both suggestions were rejected by other GPA Parties without much discussion. Hong Kong, China al l along upholds WTO's long -established and important principle of making decisions by consensus. Although Hong Kong, China may be holding a minority view in this matter, we believe it is WTO's core value that even minority view should be respected. We will not accept other GPA Parties imposing their preferences on us, doing so would mean yielding to the notion that a small economy's view is unimportant and that it should just step aside when its views are at odds with those of bigger players. Hong Kong, Chi na stands ready to work with other GPA Parties in the coming months to select the next Committee Chair in accordance with WTO's long -established tradition of making decisions by consensus. 21.17. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 146 - 21.18. I do not necessarily believe that we, as Members, need to take non -Members' interest into account in this type of decision. I do want to push back on that. I also want to point out with deep sadness the comments that were made by Hong Kong, Chi na, basing their decision with the WTO's broader interest in mind. It is unclear to us whether or not we have any common interest. That is extremely disappointing. I don't know what those broader interests are , but this definitely speaks volumes about wher e we are as a membership. 21.19. The representative of Japan provided the following statement: 21.20. Japan, one of the GPA Parties , echoes the statements made by the United Kingdom and reiterate s the content of the statement. GPA Parties have important issues to discu ss in the Committee on Government Procurement , which include Member s' accession s. The Committee 's function must not be disrupted. Japan would like to urge Hong Kong, China, to reconsider its position and join the consensus as soon as possible. 21.21. The represen tative of Chinese Taipei provided the following statement: 21.22. My delegation thanks those Members having taken floor on this agenda item and thanks China and Hong Kong, China for their statements. Frankly, on the sensitivity issue raised by China and on the i ssue of being not conducive to the work programs raised by Hong Kong, China, we have difficulty of understanding the meaning of these. If it is about the impartiality of the candidate, we must emphasize that no matter which Party takes the chairmanship, he or she needs to be neutral and impartial. China and Hong Kong, China can be assured of this from our delegation. As our candidate has indicated in her presentation to the Parties, if elected as the Committee's Chair, she will perform her d uties in a fair, impartial and transparent manner. We sincerely hope that H ong Kong, China can reconsider its position and join the consensus on the election of new chairperson for the Committee. 21.23. The General Council took note of the statements. 22 APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS TO THE SUBSIDIARY BODIES OF THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS – REPORT BY THE CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS19 22.1. The Chairman recalled that the statement20 he had delivered in the Informal meeting of the General Council would be part of the record s under th e current item with the difference that it was not going to be the CTS and the CTG Chair s that w ould be facilitating the consultations, but it would be he, as Chair of the General Council , who w ould undertake the process. A communication w ould come out in early September in that regard. 22.2. Ambassador Lundeg Purevsuren (Mongolia), Chairman of the Goods Council , provided the following statement: 22.3. I thank Members for their efforts on what has been an impasse for several months. I have asked my predecessor , Ambassador Mikael Anzén (Sweden), to conclude the process . He spent several months negotiating and consulting yet it was not possible. I thank the Chairman again for your leadership and for solving th is problem . I hope that with your initiative now concerning the guideline s, we are going to be in a better position to move our work forward in this organization . 22.4. The Chair said that, o n the basis of his statement and related understanding that he had just mentioned, he proposed that the General Council t ook note of the consensus on the proposed slate of names for the appointment of officers to the subsidiary bodies of the Goods Council, as attached to the convening notice sent to all delegations on 27 July with the understan ding that he, as Chair of the General Council, would undertake consultations on the overall exercise on the appointment of officers to avoid a repeat of such a situation in the future. 19 Before taking up this item, an Informal GC meeting was convened on 28 July to discuss the appointment of officers for subsidiary bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods . The Chairs statement, the report of the CTG Chair and statements of Members who requested that those be reflected in the minutes of this meeting can be found in Annex 4. 20 The Chair's statement at the 28 July Informal GC meeting is incorporated in the minut es of this meeting and can be found in Annex 4. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 147 - 22.5. The representative of India provided the following statement21: 22.6. First of all, we thank the efforts of all the parties – the Chairs of various bodies and the Members – to finalize the appointment of the officers for the WTO subsidiary bodies. India was fully engaged every step of the way in this process with a construct ive approach. We acknowledge the opportunity we received to engage and consult with all concerned during this process. However, the disagreement over the slate of Chairs is not of our making, but is a product of the non -inclusive and non-transparent proces s that was followed this year. 22.7. In this regard, it is with great disappointment that we wish to bring the following issues regarding the selection process for the benefit of Members: 22.8. Our experience this year revealed that the selection process is non -transparent and opaque. Often the process is left to the respective regional coordinators to decide, whom we can understand may have to follow their own approach, in the absence of a harmonized practice or a basic frame - work. 22.9. Both during the selection of Chair persons to the main and subsidiary WTO bodies, our experience was that the role of the Regional Coordinators was non -transparent and non -inclusive, throughout the process. Often our position on the matter was not relayed to the concerned interlocuters, cre ating further confusion and contradictions. 22.10. It is also a normal practice for the Regional Coordinators to inform Members at every step of the process. We are deeply disappointed to note that this has not been followed diligently during the process. 22.11. The sl ate of names should be drawn up taking into account the principle of balance, rotation and fairness – not just between the Groups but also among the Members of the Group. It is not adequate for the coordinator to satisfy himself or the Group that certain n umber of slots have been secured for the year, but rather see how many of the contested slots between the Groups were secured through negotiations, following the system of rotation and the balance needed. 22.12. We notice that the conventional practice of rotatio n of Chairs to WTO bodies is not being followed diligently and our analysis reveals that a transparent system of rotation among the four groups has been lacking. It is also a matter of concern that Chair shopping, future trading and short - selling, among ot hers, take place, as a matter of routine in selection of Chairs in this organization. This is not a happy situation. 22.13. Our concern is also on the rotation sequencing system. While the system of rotation implies that the Chairmanship rotates sequentially amon g the four groups, we do not understand the basis why the rotation has been designed to be sequencing between the three developing country groups vis-à-vis one developed country group alternately. With this practice, the developed countries get the opportu nity to Chair a WTO Body every alternate year, whereas other regional groups will have to wait for six years for their turn. By no measure such a practice is fair and balanced or it is one more form of "reverse special and differential treatment" taken up by developed Members. 22.14. Finally, we believe that time has come for us to reflect on the practices and the process of selection of Chairs, so that the process becomes transparent. In this regard, India notes the directive by the General Council Chair to both the CTG and CTS Chairs during the Informal GC on 22 July, to work on the selection process, so that the situation we find ourselves today is not repeated in the future. However, Chair, we believe that what is required is a complete overhaul of the selectio n process for both selection of main and subsidiary bodies. That can be realized only with a rigorous exercise under your oversight that will result in a revised and detailed guideline that will replace the current document WT/L/510. Only then, we can hope to ensure timely and smooth selection process each year. 22.15. Chair, we have noted your assurance to take the complete overhaul of the process under the General Council Chair's oversight and the outcome of which should replace the current document 21 At its request, the statement of the delegation of India at the 27 July Informal GC meeting is incorporated in the minutes of this meeting and can be found in Annex 4. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 148 - WT/L/510. We would also like to thank all coordinators and Members who had offered the Chairmanship of the TBT Committee for India in 2022. However, we politely decline this offer as we are against this practice of side deals and forward trading without involving al l stakeholders. 22.16. The Chair once again proposed that the General Council took note of the consensus on the proposed slate of names for the appointment of officers to the subsidiary bodies of the Goods Council, as attached to the convening notice sent to all delegations on 27 July with the understanding that he, as Chair of the General Council, would undertake consultations on the overall exercise on the appointment of officers to avoid a repeat of such a situation in the future . 22.17. The General Council so agreed . 22.18. The representative of Mongolia provided the following statement: 22.19. As a Group Coordinator I must say a few words in my own responsibility. First, I express my appreciation for you , Chair, and for your efforts to manage the situation with the appointment of officers of CTG subsidiary bodies. As a G roup Coordinator, for the last three years , I will have to reiterate my concerns and draw attention Members ' attention on the repeated cases and uncertainty in connection with the appointment of the officer of regular and subsidiary bodies. Particularly, if the reference to the interventions is made by some Members and some Chairs about a gentlem an's agreement to reserve the TBT Committee Chairmanship for someone in 2021, I would like to underline that , as a G roup Coordinator , I did not take part in that gentlem an's agreement and was not informed about it. In this regard , I would like to call other coordinators for the ir comments on it. This year , the candidate of the AGDC , India, has not withdrawn its candidature f or the TBT Chair manship. However , the issue was not addressed for unknown reasons. There were clear miscommunications therefore the situation that we are witnessing today a s well as during the last years is showing the need to review the guidelines for app ointment of officers to WTO bodies in document WT/L/510 adopted in 2002. I would like to express my strong support to the Chairman's initiative on this and look forward to constructively participate in this process. 22.20. The representative of the Russian Federa tion provided the following statement: 22.21. I would like to stress that , while Russia joined consensus regarding the slate of names for CTG bodies , we are seriously disappointed both with the process this year and the result. We witness that this housekeeping p rocedure is getting worse and worse every year. In fact there is a very important principle in the existing rules of procedure for appointment of Chairs which is the capacity and availability of a Chairperson to undertake special responsibility required of the post in the WTO system. It is unfortunate that many Members forget about this primary principle speaking about geographical rotation between developing and developed countries and other issues of such kind. I think that in improving the procedure , we should keep this principle as a primary one and it is already in the existing rules. My delegation would like to strongly support your proposal to launch consultation s on enhancing current approaches for appointment of officers to WTO bodies . We think that this will keep our organization relevant or make it relevant. It is my understanding that this consultation will not be limited to regional coordinators , but all interested Members would have an opportunity to participate in this process. 22.22. The Chair clarified that the c ommunication that he would send, as Chair of the General Council, would invite all interested delegation s to share one's point of view and participate in the consultations. 22.23. The representative of the United States provided the following statement: 22.24. Thank you Chair for convening a series of conversations that brought us to the resolution today. We have long expressed frustration with the existing process for Chair selection and we welcome the engagement of other Memb ers to review and revise this process. We welcome your suggestion for consultations and can assure you of the support of the United States in going forward in our engagement. 22.25. The representative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided the following statemen t: WT/GC/M/19 2 - 149 - 22.26. Chair, w e are lucky to have you with your long experience in this process so we are happy to see that your wisdom led us to reach consensus finally in the slate of names. We also welcom e your initiative to start the consultations in this regard. This is a longstanding issue time and we would like to say a few words to Members in this regard. We can set rules and improve guidance from time to time and revisit them but honestly there is also a principle of this house that we have to respect. Rotation is al ready there so we call on Members to avoid circumventi ng it when we try to implement our guidance principles. We are sure that the consultations will lead us to satisfactory solutions and outcomes on this housekeeping issue. 22.27. The representative of Mexico provided the following statement: 22.28. Mexico has never orchestrated a smear campaign against a WTO Member, and in this particular case against India. What we have pointed out in the Council for Trade in Goods are facts, which I will no t mention, but for the reference of the membership I request that my statement include the symbol of the minutes of the last meeting.22 22.29. The representative of Chile provided the following statement: 22.30. We would like to thank for your efforts to find a solution on this matter. We however regret the time that this process has taken , and the pressure put on the membership during the debate . It is not appropriate in this organization , especially as it does n ot help build the necessary confidence in the preparations for the Ministerial Conference at the end of the year. 22.31. The General Council took note of the statements23. 23 OTHER BUSINESS 23.1. The Chairman recalled that t he General Council Procedures for Members and O bservers subject to Administrative Measures in WT/BFA/132 require d that, at the end of each meeting of the General Council, the Chair of the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration would provide information with regard to which Members and Observer s were under Administrative Measures. 23.2. Ambassador Bettina Waldmann (Germany), Chair of the CBFA, provided the following statement: 23.3. The Administrative Measures applicable to Members and Observers with arrears in contribution have been in place since 1st March 2013. In accordance with the decision of the General Council, I shall state all Members and Observers under all categories of administrative measures. As at 28 July 2021, there were 18 Members and 9 Observers under Administrative Measures. 23.4. The follow ing 7 Members are currently in Category I: Belize, Djibouti, Gabon, Mauritania, Papua New Guinea, Suriname and Yemen. 23.5. The following 2 Members are in Category II: Cuba and Guinea. 23.6. The following 9 Members are in Category III : Antigua and Barbuda, Burundi*, C entral African Republic*, Chad*, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea -Bissau*, Senegal, Venezuela [*Members not compliant with payment plan terms] . 22 At its 31 March and 1 April meeting, the Council for Trade in Goods took up t he agenda item on the "Appointment of Officers to the Subsidiary Bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods ". The minutes of this meeting can be found in G/C/M/139. This agenda item was suspended. At its 8 -9 July meet ing, the Council for Trade in Goods took up the agenda item on the " Appointment of Officers to the Subsidiary Bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods: Information from the Chair ". The minutes of this meeting can be found in G/C/M/140 (to be issued). The 31 March and 1 April formal meeting was then reconvened on 26 July to take up the suspended item. The minutes of this meeting can be found in G/C/M/140/Add.1 (to be issued). An informal meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods also took place on 26 July . 23 The delegation of Thailand subsequently requested that its written statement under Agenda Item 22, "Appointment of Officers to the Subsidiary Bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods – Report by the C hair of the Council for Trade in Goods" b e incorporated in the minutes of this meeting. The statement can be found in Annex 4 of this document . WT/GC/M/19 2 - 150 - 23.7. The following 5 Observers are in Category I: Comoros, Iran, Iraq, Lebanese Republic and Sudan. Th ere is only one Observer in Category II: Syria. The following 3 Observers are in Category III: Libya, Sao Tomé and Principe and Somalia . 23.8. The Chair requested, as required by the General Council Procedures, Members and Observers in Categories II and III of t he Measures to inform the Secretariat as to when their payment of arrears may be expected. 23.9. The General Council took note of the statements. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 151 - ANNEX 1 STATEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR -GENERAL, THE CHAIR OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL AND THE CHAIRS OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUPS AT THE INFORMAL TNC AND INFORMAL HODS MEETINGS HELD ON 23 JULY 2021 _______________ STATEMENT BY THE DIRECTOR -GENERAL DR. NGOZI OKONJO -IWEALA I ask for your indulgence because I will speak at leng th today as there is a lot of ground to cover. You have all said that July would be the key moment to determine how we proceed in the final months before MC12. July is almost over. You just heard from the Negotiating Group Chairs that gaps remain in all areas – some wider than others. In fact, if you listen to the reports it looks like there are great difficulties. Today, we face a choice to either continue to bring everything to the table or to look for ways to see what we can realistically achieve. Pragmatism does not mean agreements for the sake of agreements or forgetting about issues that are less ripe for convergence. On the contrary. Our goal remains to deliver meaningful, quality outcomes that would positively impact people's lives and livelihoods around the world. Pragmatism also means responding to the work of the Chairs and trying to be as constructive as possible. And pragmatism means working within the realm of what is possible to achieve our goals. If something cannot realistically be accomp lished by MC12, let's not give up on it. Let's find ways to keep these issues going and alive post -MC12. I love what the GC Chair wisely said that if we cannot finish it, let's find a way through a political statement, a framework or a work programme to mo ve these things forward. Conclusions about what is within reach depend heavily on what you will say today. This is why I requested you to come prepared to engage in a pragmatic and focused discussion. Again, I know that many of you may have difficulties. I am not expecting easy answers. But what I do expect is for us to look forward and not backwards. At the same time, you – the Members – have entrusted me, as Director -General and TNC Chair, with the responsibility of being as honest a broker as I can, and facilitator with emphasis on delivering results. This is the mandate I received from you. It is a mandate I take very seriously. Today is no exception. Let me therefore briefly touch upon some possible issues and deliverables for MC12 and beyond based on what I have been hearing from you and the Chairs. Again, this is not exhaustive, but we would not have time to go through everything. On fisheries subsidies, you were all present last week. You have heard Santiago's report and the next steps he has outline d, which I fully support. Some of you have since then come forward to say you have difficulties with lots of gaps in the text. We hear you. But what Santiago clearly said today is that there will be two stages of the work. In the first stage in September, we will all work to improve the text to make it the basis of which you can go on to line -by-line negotiations. In the second part, in October, you will start with the line -by-line negotiations. So, I hope this will meet all the concerns of all those who fe el that they have not been heard – that they want to do more work on the texts. So, this work is going to happen. As Santiago said, the gaps remain but we need to find a balance that all of you are calling for. And we cannot find it unless all sides are pr epared to give something. All delegations have to contribute something. So, the time to read statements is over. We are now called to move forward with the END in mind – Engage, Negotiate and Deliver. Flexibility and constructive engagement remain critical . Everyone has said they don't want to hear the same statements they have heard before. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 152 - I also want to follow up on one issue on which several Ministers and Heads of Delegation emphasized. This is the importance of technical and financial support for deve loping and least developed countries to build fisheries management expertise to implement the WTO agreement. This is in Article 7 of the draft text. And I want to reiterate that such support should not be seen as a substitute for special and differential t reatment. In this regard, I refer you to a communication I jointly sent with Ambassador Wills on 19 July in document TN/C/21, regarding a concept note on a possible WTO Funding Mechanism geared towards financing technical assistance and capacity building i n support of implementing new WTO fisheries subsidies disciplines. We developed this note in conjunction with the FAO and IFAD as a team. In addition, the World Bank is the other partner willing to collaborate and cooperate with us on this. We are not a fi sheries management agency, but we have partners who have that capacity. And they are willing to work with us. As indicated in the communication, this week I started outreach to Members – including group coordinators, some potential beneficiaries, and pote ntial donors – to hear initial comments on the idea. At present the proposed size of the Mechanism is an indicative USD 20 million, with an indicative starting amount of USD 10 million. On Wednesday, I heard useful preliminary comments from both potential beneficiaries and potential donors, who are of course still consulting Capitals. While the idea of such a Funding Mechanism was welcomed in principle as a supplement to the disciplines being negotiated, potential beneficiaries raised several questions and concerns. These included the relationship with S&DT, which I have just touched on which delegations stressed could not be substituted for by the prospective Funding Mechanism. Other issues that arose were the timing of these discussions given the ongoing negotiation s on potential disciplines; the sustainability of a mechanism dependent on voluntary contributions; the scope and objectives of the Mechanism; and eligibility criteria – for instance, whether a per -capita income criteria would be employed. Delegations call ed for taking into account the experience with previous trust funds in the WTO, pointing to the Trade Facilitation Agreement Facility and questions about the governance arrangements of the Standards and Trade Development Facility. They stressed the need n ot to overlap with existing mechanisms at the bilateral, regional and multilateral levels. From prospective donors, I heard positive interest and willingness to engage, and support for starting this conversation early. However, they cautioned that the Mech anism should be only to assist developing countries and LDCs to implement disciplines that they take on. They also stressed it should be based on need. I explained that the Fund will not indeed substitute in any way special and differential treatment and does not prejudge the negotiations on the document and is starting early due to budget cycles that need to be taken into account and is designed only for those who want to have access to it. I look forward to hearing further views today, but let me state th e following: a. First, I have heard many developing and LDC Members – including at last week's Ministerial, say they will be unable to implement future disciplines without financial support. That is what informed the development of the concept note with our p artners. Capacity support is not intended to be forced on anyone but is meant for those who want to use it. Let me stress that it is neither a carrot nor a stick to get anyone to agree to anything. It is about putting in place the resources some Members sa y they may need to implement the disciplines they negotiate and strengthen their fisheries management capacity. b. Second, we thought that we needed to start early as I said, given budget cycles and constraints in many donor countries. That comes from my fin ance background. Planning ahead makes it likelier they will be able to contribute. Let's give them as much time as they need. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 153 - c. Third, I want to echo what many of you have said: I said it earlier, we are not a Fisheries Management Organization. Any assistan ce we offer will be within the ambit of the WTO's own work. However, partnering with the FAO, IFAD and the World Bank is eminently sensible. It would allow these organizations to contribute. It is one of the things that you asked me to do which is to try t o work with other international organizations to strengthen our own work. d. Fourth, the comments on learning lessons from other Trust Funds and governance structures are well taken. Starting early will help us design a Mechanism that avoids previous pitfalls and takes fully into account both beneficiary and donor perspectives. e. Fifth, on the size of the fund – the idea is to start modest. We debated it with the FAO and IFAD and decided to put the amount we have in and then we determine what the demand is. Base d on the level of demand, we will know how much further we go with the fund in terms of the size. This will also address the sustainability issue – so that the Mechanism, which will be funded only by Members who are able and willing to do so, does not run dry. I will continue my outreach to you on this issue in the coming days and weeks. Moving to agriculture, I have heard many Members – developed, developing and LDCs – say that in their view, a successful MC12 would have to include meaningful outcomes on agriculture. Whether your interest is driven by food security, livelihood security, development, or all of the above, a strong push to deliver at MC12 is evident. But what is also evident – and reflected in Ambassador Peralta's report today – is that you r emain far apart on every area under consideration. But I do not give up. I believe we can make progress, but it will require changes in how you engage with each other. It will require realism on what we can put together. • We must go beyond coordinating wi th like -minded Members and reach out to those with opposing positions, to find mutually agreeable solutions. • We should be clear about the issues Members are trying to address and be open to discussing different ways of resolving them. • And finally, we must be systematic and solution -oriented, taking one step at a time. I reiterate Gloria's call for all delegations to constructively participate in the discussions she is organizing between now and the summer break. These talks are about people's lives, livelih oods, and health – that is why you take them so seriously. If you were listening to Gloria's report, you know that she is working hard to develop a plan for MC12 and beyond. So please, let's help her and work with her. Turning now to special and differenti al treatment, Ambassador Hassan's report made it clear that, despite divergent views, S&DT remains a vital issue for Members to address. I do not think we can shy away from this issue by not responding. I want us to persevere, and I thank Kadra for her diligence and her own perseverance in trying to move this area forward. From my conversations with many of you – and what we just heard from Kadra – describing S&DT as a tough issue is an understatement of the century. In my view, in order to take meaningful steps forward, we need to look back at the fundamentals. Why do we have S&DT? One thing is clear – S&DT remains an integral part of the WTO Framework. In the view of many, it is an essential tool to help Members fulfil their obligations and implement the ir commitments. Viewed through this prism, reaching meaningful outcomes on S&DT is in the interest of all Members, and we need to find space to converge on some of the elements in this area, if not all. Several proposals from the G90 are on the table. If w e could take a step forward, even on one or two; three or four of these proposals by MC12 – taking into account, for example, the needs of the most vulnerable – this might pave the way for greater traction. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 154 - Easier said than done, I know – but as the Chines e say, "even a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step". I really encourage all Members to engage with Kadra, and more importantly, with each other, to advance discussions. I stand ready to assist as needed. And this is a particular plea on S&DT – we have to find ways to deal with this area. We have also heard the report of Zhanar on Services. Given the growing prominence of services trade in the modern economy, I think this work has gone on for too long. So, it is time for us to come to gri ps with this and see how we can take concrete steps forward. This morning I met with a group of trade experts, Professors from some universities around us and beyond to talk about what is the future of trade. I was there with DDG Gonzalez. What they pointe d out is that services is it. If we do not come to grips with what we need to do with services , we will be behind. So , I really want to urge Members to get to grips with this . Finally, Members continue discussions in other Negotiating Groups as well, which will evolve depending on Members' willingness to engage. In all areas of the negotiations, Members will have to give something to get something. If Members are serious about delivering meaningful results, you know that a tough road awaits. The question is, do you want to walk that tough road or not? What I have been hearing so far is "yes but". You see obstacles, stones and potholes along the way. But we can fix this road together. So, let us try to bear in mind our common destination – making the WTO deliver meaningful outcomes for all people. Let us not consta ntly refer to what does not work. We can talk about it but let's also suggest how we can make it work. Turning now to the WTO's response to the pandemic. This is a priority for all Members. I commend the efforts of the General Council Chair, Ambassador Ca stillo, to bring together the different strands of work into one process and for appointing Ambassador Walker to facilitate it. I thank Ambassador Walker for his update at yesterday's Informal GC, and I look forward to his formal report at next week's Gen eral Council. I hope all Members will constructively participate in this process with a sense of urgency. And I thank you for what you have done so far to participate. As the world seeks to scale up COVID -19 vaccine production and rollout to end the pande mic, the WTO is squarely in the middle of the debate. This is appropriate given the importance of trade and international supply chains to producing the vaccines the world needs. But it also raises expectations for us to effectively respond to this and fut ure pandemics. I remain optimistic that the WTO can come up with a strong response on aspects relating to trade policy. Many of you individual Members have made suggestions on this. And of course, some groups like the Ottawa Group have contributed. In thi s regard, let me recall the three angles that we looked at during the TNC/HoDs in June: supply chain issues; working with manufacturers to increase production and investment, particularly in developing countries; emerging markets and developing countries; and issues related to the transfer of intellectual property and technology and knowhow. First, keeping supply chains open and efficient is critical for vaccine production. The WTO has a well - established role here with regard to trade facilitation and trade restrictions. Manufacturers and other participants at the vaccine equity event we co -hosted with the WHO on Wednesday, which has received a lot of positive feedback, made clear they were looking to WTO Members for action on export restrictions and regulat ory issues. I will come back to this event in more detail. For now, I will say that Secretariat monitoring and analysis suggest that about 37 of the 50 COVID -19-related export restrictions we have on file could potentially affect vaccine inputs or supplies needed to administer vaccines. Looking ahead, we need to think of what we can do on these supply chain issues in the case of future pandemics, so that we do not have to start from scratch. With regard to recent trade facilitating and trade restricting me asures, we will discuss my latest Trade Monitoring Report in document WT/TPR/OV/W/15 at the Informal TPRB Meeting on Monitoring next week, on 29 July. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 155 - Second, also related to supply chains, there is a role for the WTO to work with all stakeholders to identify, at a very granular level, the bottlenecks and supply shortages in international markets for raw materials and vaccine components. This would help manufacturers increase production and investment. And we also heard from the ICC, John Denton and his col leagues, of a supply chain watchtower which they would like to collaborate with us. Related to this, the WTO on 29 June hosted a technical symposium on supply chain transparency, led by DDGs Angela Ellard and Anabel Gonzalez. The feedback I have received h as been uniformly positive. Working with the manufacturing sector to look at supply chain bottlenecks and shortages was viewed positively, as an incentive for manufacturers to invest in present and future capacity. So was the goal of putting together a vol untary mechanism for supply chain monitoring. The Third and final angle involves the transfer of technology and knowhow, and other issues around intellectual property. I am really hoping that by the end of this month, the negotiations in the TRIPS Council would have made some progress and made enough for us to have a sese of what we might agree upon in this issue. We need to move with a sense of urgency here. I have always said it. People's lives are at stake. The outside world expects us to come up with a practical and forward - looking solution to these issues. By the General Council meeting next week, Ambassador Walker will hopefully be in a position to provide some clear indications on several of these aspects – and how we might bring them all together. I encourage Members to actively engage and work together on shaping the WTO's response to this and future health crises. Let me come back to Wednesday's vaccine equity conference. It was organized as a follow -up event to the first one in April, to look at w hat has changed – and what needs to improve – on vaccine production, investment, and access. In addition to WHO DG Dr. Tedros and WIPO DG Daren Tang, it brought together manufacturers as well as policymakers, public health activists, governments, philanthr opists, and development finance institutions. It was done under Chatham House Rules so that the CEOs would speak clearly and frankly. And I think this happened. To make the event inclusive, we invited the group coordinators of all the formal groups within the institution. CEOs from leading pharmaceutical companies participated, underscoring the importance being given to the WTO's responsibilities in this space. In fact, I heard even some of the CEOs themselves said that they had not gathered together in thi s kind of event and this was a first for many of them. We heard that vaccine production has increased significantly, thanks both to efficiency gains within existing production facilities in developed countries and investment in new ones, including in developing countries. Total production could increase from 3.8 billion doses as of mid -July to 11 billion doses by the end of the year. But concentration remains – according to the data provided by Airfinity, 75% of those doses will have been made in 5 of our Members. Even more significantly, the equity problems persist – and by some measures, are widening. Only 1.5% of people in Africa, and 0.3% of people in low -income countries, are vaccinated, compared to over 42% in developed countries. And as new, more tra nsmissible variants spread, death rates are rising in many developing country regions. As I noted earlier, participants pointed to trade restrictions and onerous regulations, along with raw material shortages, as important obstacles to increased production . While there was general agreement on the need to keep markets open and predictable, and on the importance of technology and knowhow transfer, participants' views differed on the TRIPS waiver proposal. The important thing was that the CEOs had a chance t o listen to different views on intellectual property and Members had a chance to listen to the views of CEOs and were able to talk to them. Dr. Tedros and I will continue our collaborative efforts to work with manufacturers and other relevant groups for t imely and equitable access to vaccines and medicines across the globe. These meetings are not the only way we are cooperating with other organizations on the pandemic response. The IMF, World Bank, WHO and WTO have come together and created a Task Force – a "war room" to track, coordinate and advance the delivery of COVID -19 health tools to developing countries, and to mobilize the relevant stakeholders and leaders to remove critical roadblocks. This WT/GC/M/19 2 - 156 - is being done in collaboration with ACT -A and COVAX. We have called for $50 billion in up -front spending to vaccinate at least 40 percent of people in all countries by the end of this year and at least 60 percent by the first half of 2022. IMF research suggests that this could give a $9 trillion boost to the wo rld economy by 2025 and put us on the path to sustainable recovery. Separately, Dr. Tedros, WIPO DG Daren Tang, and I have agreed to collaborate on a series of workshops on technology transfer and IP issues. The goal here is to implement a joint platform for tripartite technical assistance for Members relating to their needs for medical technologies. On the subject of preparing for future pandemics, let me also note that I participated at the G20 Finance Ministers Meeting in Venice this month. Together wit h my fellow co -chairs of the High -Level Independent Panel on Financing the Global Commons for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, we presented a report calling for a $15 billion per year increase in international financing for the next five years to plug m ajor gaps in preventing and preparing for global health threats. I am convinced that a WTO trade framework would be a useful complement to these international efforts to put in place financing and governance arrangements so that we are better prepared for future pandemics. The last topic on my list is dispute settlement. We have heard Ambassador Johnson's report. This is a critical issue, as I said at the informal GC yesterday. Ministers, Ambassadors and stakeholders continue to ask me to help us find a way forward. I want to thank the DSB Chair, Ambassador Chambovey, and Ambassador Castillo, the GC Chair, who have been actively involved in this issue. My thanks also to DDG Ellard who is assisting me. I also refer you to the consultations that the GC Chair h as undertaken in this regard this week – as he reported at yesterday's Informal General Council meeting. In sum, we have a great deal of ground to cover between now and MC12. I urge all delegations to keep your interventions focused on building convergence and on what each of you can contribute to progress in the two, three or four areas by MC12. I hope you will not reiterate longstanding positions but instead try to identify results that could be delivered in the 3 -month working period from 1 September. I want to end by saying that I am not trying to stop anyone from saying what they want to say, but I am just saying maybe we can frame it very constructively. _______________ Let me pick up on one point the GC Chair made – that we should aim for texts in the various areas of work by mid - to late October. I totally agree. We should use this as a marker and plan to allocate time accordingly. You have now heard from the General Council Chair, the Chairs of the Negotiati ng Groups and myself. As you take the floor, I urge you to focus on ways all Members can converge towards a game plan for the three working months between now and MC12. Please listen to each other and take each other's views into account. Talking past each other is a luxury none of us can afford. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 157 - Conclu ding Remarks Let me begin by thanking you all onc e again for the patience you have shown today. It's a really good marker because the agenda at next week's GC is very full and I hope we can also show the same patience to get through that agenda in the two days allocated. But thanks to all of you for going through this today and for your very constructive and forward -looking approach to how to prepare for MC12. We had a really good atmosp here here today, notwithstanding one or two hiccups. We had a good atmosphere with a willingness to move forward, to work together and certainly a willingness to have a successful MC12. I note the concern s from the LDCs in particular about the logistics of MC12 and the need to make a decision on the matter. I note that concern including on possible vaccine certificates also mentioned by Ambassador Spencer. These are all very important issues, and we hope to have a better idea after th e summer break about the direction in which this is headed and be able to see if we can give a better indication that we all want, if at all possible, a presential meeting MC12, even if we have to limit delegation size. But let's see what the Swiss authori ties would say on the matter and how we could move forward in this regard. I believe that one thing that will help us to advance and move forward is look ing at each negotiating area on its own merits and avoiding linkages to others that could hold us back. I understand that we all want success in every area. But, if we have areas that are moving along well, we should try to progress them without holding them hostage to other areas. I believe that we all want success – not failure. I know that at this point, some of you are probably seeing the glass as half empty. I see the glass as half full. We must aim to push forward in a realistic and pragmatic manner that does not take us backwards – as Ambassador Parola said earlier today. I would like to echo Ambassa dor Wills that a number of things are within our reach. However, we must choose between sticking to our comfort zones or acting with boldness, pragmatism, and responsibility in order to achieve the success we want . And hearing you today, I am comforted tha t basically, virtually all of us, want that success. I really b elieve in keeping our chins up. I heard Thailand and Canada today say they didn't know whether to be pessimistic, optimistic or in -between. And they chose optimism. I choose the same. When I l ook at things here it's very easy to become cynical or so mistrustful or pessimistic that you get stuck. And I just want to pledge that we are not going to do that. I want us to keep smiling, to keep working , to keep moving no matter the obstacles and the amount of pessimism thrown our way. Because it is o nly with a positive and realistic attitude that we will move t his organization forward. I am not being pol lyannish. It is not pie in the sky. I think we actually ought to try to practice that. Now, let me touch on some of the themes that I heard today. And please forgive me because we were trying to summarize it as you were speaking. Let me first assure Members who are interested that the Minutes of the TNC Ministerial on Thursday, 15th July are being worke d on and will be ready shortly. The statements of all Ministers and Heads of Delegation that participated in the meeting will be attached and circulated to all Members . On fisheries subsidies, I hear d a willingness to move forward. But let me say to all wh o have problems with the text that I hope you listened to Ambassador Wills and I think many of you did and you reflected it in your statement . You and your Ministers and Heads of Delegation have been heard loud and clear. Santiago said it very clearly toda y, and I want to repeat it – you have been heard – September's work will focus on the large macro issues and imbalances in the text. This is what he outlined. Following that, work in October will get more detailed, more focused, more line - by-line, trying t o get to the finish line. I hope this will provide comfor t. Regarding technical assistance and the Funding Mechanism , I note the discomfort of some delegations. We shall address these discomforts one by one. I want to make it clear that we think we are try ing to put it together to assist Members that need it to implement necessary disciplines when these disciplines are agreed and not before. We are very cognizant of the fact that the negotiations still have some way to go, and the Fund is in no way meant to prejudge the outcome. We are just trying to prepare in case it is wanted. All those who do not feel they need it do not have WT/GC/M/19 2 - 158 - to apply or use it. It is not meant to substitute for structural issues . Those need to be sorted out as part of the work in September and October. And we have tried to be very modest on the size of the Funding Mechanism for those who asked about the size, because we want to be careful about demand. As we move along, hopefully, we will be able to find ways to have sustainability and certainty of the funds coming in. I want to thank all those Members who have indicated that it could be possible for them to support such a fund and I want to send thanks to our partners at the FAO, IFAD and the World Bank who are excited to be working with us on this. I want to reiterate that we are not a Fisheries Management Agency, but these organizations have the capacity, and they are willing to help our Members in any way that they may deem necessary. With respect to the fis heries subsidies negotiations, no one is in a haste to negotiate a non - meaningful outcome. It would be to the discredit of this organization and all its Members if we were seen to produce an outcome that did not have the necessary ambition or disciplines. I will keep repeating that. I myself do not want to be party to an outcome like that. And I know that all our Members do not. So, I want to underscore that point. But I also believe that we have what it takes as a group to negotiate a quality outcome and t o negotiate it in adequate time. As many people have said, it has taken 20 years, our Leaders have asked us to deliver SDG 14.6 and all our Leaders participated. I will reiterate what I said sometime earlier because I was one of the high -level panels that actually worked on the SDGs. We came up with 12 and then there are 17. All our Leaders pledged to these universal goals. So, I think it would be meaningful if we do not drag it out longer. We must respect the views and opinions of all Members and try to ta ke that into account. But I do not believe that dragging it for another year or two will deliver anything more meaningful. We must also learn how to walk and chew gum. We can do quality and we can do it in adequate time. I hope you continue to work with Ambassador Santiago Wills in a constructive and flexible manner . I just want to highlight the statement made by Ambassador Sørli in this regard. While keeping to his points, and I hope to have his statement, he declared that Norway will be flexible to consider all the views and opinions of all other Members with a view to trying to contribute to having this negotiation completed. Norway was not giving up its position. It was just saying it was willing to look at all the angles. With that in mind, I again urg e all delegations to work with the END in mind – Engage, Negotiate and Deliver. Second, on agriculture, it is clear that we have a long way ahead. If fish eries is tough, agriculture is certainly tougher. The good news is – we all want a package from agricu lture. T he bad news is the different levels of ambition that we have. But I would like to ask, as I asked for fisheries, that we all work with Ambassador Gloria Abraham Peralta to put a package that is credible together because we have heard time and again that getting to M C12 without a credible package on agriculture would be difficult. While we have a tough road ahead, I urge you to think of issues linked also to the recovery in this pandemic – issues of food security that are vital to many of our Member s and especially the developing ones, issues of domestic support that many delegations have flagged that we should look at and issues such as SSM, Cotton, PSH, WFP exemption and transparency, among many others. If we look at all this and work with Ambassad or Peralta, we would be able to come up with a credible package because there seems to be a willingness to do so. Third, on the WTO's response to the pandemic, clearly, from every side, everyone has said this is an area where we need to have an outcome – not only for now but for the future. As Alexandre said this morning, it would be embarrassing if we did not have a credible outcome in this area. The world, including business, governments , the international community, CSOs, they expect us to deliver. And I know and think we are getting there. The elements are becoming clearer, even though on the issue of IP we have a long road ahead. We need to work harder and come together to try to see if we can get to where Ambassador Pitfield said. Let us try to see how we can come together on all the elements including IP. With all the contributions made, we can find a continuum i f we sit down and are willing to negotiate and talk to each other. I hope we can progress on this in the days ahead. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 159 - I want to thank all the contributors, individual countries like Chinese Taipei, Brazil, the EU and many other Members. The Ottawa Group has also put a lot of work into this. But I also want to thank Ambassadors Tan and Spencer for the work that they have done – the excellent work they put together which they have handed over to Ambassador Walker. We are all looking forward to this facilitatio n process, as I said earlier, working with the GC Chair. The essentials are all there. I think they are before us. I am happy many of you found some meaningful outcome or learning from the 21 July meeting that we had – the dialogue with the manufacturers. I believe there are also issues we can pull out from that in order to enable us to arrive at a credible package. Fourth, on dispute settlement, what I heard is that an outcome is needed which, at a minimum, should be a common understanding on the reforms of the dispute settlement system that we want. We cannot have a very high level of ambition on this, but everyone has said that as a rules -based organization, going to MC12, we need to have a minimum of understanding on what all Members want the dispute se ttlement system to look like. After that, perhaps we can then consider what type of a work programme or timeline we could put together post MC12. That is the basics that I have heard, and I hope we can get there. Fifth, on WTO Reform, of which the dispute settlement system is a part of, it is clear that the desire to work on this remains. And the idea of a Working Group that has been suggested is a good one that we should think about. But I believe that Members need to come to a common understanding of wha t is meant by WTO Reform. I said the same to the Ottawa Group yesterday when they were reviewing it. We should a gree on what elements constitute this – even within the core functions of the WTO – monitoring, transparency, negotiations and, of course, dispute settlement because as I have listened to Members there are different interpretations of what WTO reform is all about. So, I think the first job for the Working Group if we can get that together is to actually try and make sure we have a common basis o f what we mean by the Reform. On issues of monitoring and transparency, let me just make one point that is very dear to me. We want to strengthen the monitoring and transparency function. But many Members do not allow the Secretariat to collect information or if they do, they do not allow the Secretariat to publish it. So, I really am puzzled about how we can strengthen transparency and do our monitoring in the absence of this. It is quite embarrassing when I see Heads of other organizations using or referring to trade statistics which we are not allowed to publish or collect. The IMF, the World Bank, even private places like St. Gallen are quoting statis tics which this organization is supposed to be an authority on. But our staff are not allowed to put that together and they are not allowed to publish them. So, if we want to do WTO Reform, I really do want people to reflect on this transparency and monito ring function. Transparency is a word we throw around a lot among the Membership. But I think it means different things to different people. We need a common definition on what we mean by transparency if we really want to reform. So, let me reiterate, that on WTO Reform, I believe that the first task is to figure out and make sure that we are all sharing the definition s of reform. Sixth, on S&DT, this is a central tenet of the WTO. Let us not stonewall th e issue but work together to try and make a go at it. I know this issue is difficult all around, but we cannot get away with it. We need to engage , and we need to work with Kadra and the G90 to see how practically we can move forward and what our approach should be to those proposals that have been made spec ifically – and we may have to come back to the issue of S&DT in a broader way. In closing, let me make a couple of remarks. This is our last TNC before the summer break. Over the past four months that I have been here, although it feels like 4 years alrea dy, you have worked very hard, and you have worked together . And I think together , we have gotten a lot done. So, I really want to thank you for your hard work. • We have moved on fish eries subsidies negotiations further than we have due to the brave work o f Ambassador Wills and the Secretariat team. Yes, it looks tough, but we have a fighting chance to conclude by MC12. This historic Ministerial meeting that we held after 4 years of not having one has given us, as many Members said, political boost and direction. Let 's not lose this. Let's seize this. Let us show that we can complete the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 160 - multilateral negotiations. That's what we are about, isn't it? Multilateralism. If we want more of it, then we have to show we can really do it. Otherwise, people won't beli eve us. • We have placed the WTO squarely at the centre of the solution to COVID -19. This is the second thing I think we have done through your work on the WTO's response including all the submissions that I referred to earlier. The WTO is now seen as a cr itical entity in monitoring supply chains and working with manufacturers to scale up output. It was not always that way. I think you all remember when I came and I shared with you how I would be participating in meetings with WHO, CEPI, GAVI and all other organizations dealing with the response to the pandemic . And they would be talking about these issues without mentioning the WTO. Today , this is not the case . We have made clear that we are part of the solution to this problem – and our name is being menti oned. Beyond being mentioned, we are actually expected to help solve problems. So, I urge us again to seize on this new momentum where we are seen as being part of the global common solution to a global common problem. And let's work with it. • We have als o strengthened ties with international organizations . This is the third thing we have done , working with WIPO , WHO, IMF and World Bank on a whole series of issues. We have strengthened outreach to the manufacturers, to the private sector and we have continued to reach out to civil society. We are even planning to do some work with the private sector on voluntary monitoring, if it is possible. So that outreach that many of you asked for, that working with other international organizations, I think it i s beginning to happen and is the third thing that I think we have made progress on. • And of course, due to your good work, we have advanced discussions on a number of issues that you mentioned today such as MSMEs, Gender, E -Commerce, Trade and Climate, Ser vices Domestic Regulation, Investment Facilitation and so on . And I could sense the excitement in the voice s of Member s including Ambassador Cancela of Uruguay as he talked about MSMEs which was palpable. So, thank you all for bringing this sense of passio n to all that work. Let me close by saying that I remain hopeful that, together, we can deliver meaningful, quality outcomes for the people we serve. For all the differences of opinion we heard today, it is clear that this noble objective is one that eve ryone shares. So, I invite you to always keep that in mind. If we keep in mind that we are here to serve people, it really helps us to overcome the seeming differences that we have. I want to reiterate that I am here to help. My door remains open to all . I am willing to work as hard as it takes, and I hope to see many of you coming forward so that we can work together. My statement today will be circulated as a JOB/TNC document. I also plan to provide a report of our 15 July Ministerial Meeting and two Info rmal TNC/HoDs in June and in July to the G eneral Council on Tuesday under Agenda Item 1. With that I end my statement. Thank you very much . _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 161 - STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR DACIO CASTILLO, CHAIR OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL Thank you very much Director -General for convening this TNC and Heads of Delegation meeting which is helpful as we find a collective way forward from now until MC12. I commend you DG for placing a high value on delivering meaningful outcomes and for your earnest efforts in this regard. As I have provided a report on my recent consultations at the Informal General Council meeting yesterday, I will just highlight a few points. We are appro aching a crucial moment – with MC12 just around the corner. We have to start paving the way now for the various areas to move forward. We have heard the reports of the NG Chairs today and of Ambassador Walker's and mine yesterday. A lot of work needs to b e done and we do not have much time. This calls for us to focus our work on the key priority issues – and begin preparing possible outcomes. And for our Ministers to be in a position to consider the results before they meet at MC12, we need to conclude o ur work early. With this in mind, as I said yesterday, we should aim for texts as soon as possible in the various areas of work that Members are aiming to deliver. So, I intend to resume work immediately after the summer break. Next week's formal GC is considered by delegations as a marker in the lead up to MC12. Your interventions today will inform those discussions. So, I encourage all of you to participate in this spirit and to remain constructively engaged in the intense processes ahead. And in conc luding, allow me as GC Chair to sincerely thank the Director -General for her tireless engagement, efforts and determination in continuously bringing Members together towards a successful MC12. I also thank you, DG, for your leadership in bringing together key stakeholders and participants in a series of high -level events; and for being at the helm of the constructive collaboration between relevant agencies. I very much look forward to continuing working in close collaboration with you in the second part of this busy year as we sketch together with Members the path forward towards MC12. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 162 - ORAL REPORT BY AMBASSADOR SANTIAGO WILLS (COLOMBIA), CHAIR OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES Since my last report on 3 May, the Negotiating Group on Rules (NGR) has continued to work intensively leading up to the Ministerial -level meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC) that took place last week on 15 July. Let me first thank all of you and your delegates for the dedication and flexibility de monstrated during this intense period of work. You engaged almost non -stop, including on some weekends, early mornings and late evenings, and sometimes at short notice. The Ministerial meeting last week was productive, and it would not have been possible w ithout your hard work. Shortly after making my last report to the TNC on 3 May, and based on the meetings and consultations held with delegations, on 11 May, I introduced a further revision of our draft working text, in document TN/RL/W/276, with an introd uction explaining each element of the draft text in document 276/Add.1. Following the circulation of the text, I held consultations with over forty delegations and groups of delegations representing nearly the full Membership of the WTO. The objective of these consultations was to hear the key reactions and concerns of delegations. A number of common themes emerged from these consultations, which then served as a basis for structuring work in the NGR for the rest of May and June. This work was based on eac h of the pillars, that is: subsidies to IUU fishing; subsidies to fishing overfished stocks; and subsidies contributing to overcapacity and overfishing; as well as cross -cutting issues such as notifications and transparency, and dispute settlement. In addi tion, special and differential treatment was integrated throughout the discussion of the pillars, as well as being discussed during a dedicated session. The meetings were held at the Heads of Delegation (HoDs) level in various configurations. To ensure transparency and inclusiveness, the work was structured such that everything discussed in smaller groups was also discussed in open -ended meetings. Let me also take this opportunity to thank the DG for following our work closely during this period and makin g a lot of time in her schedule to join us for a number of these discussions. This work was productive and on 30 June I presented to the Negotiating Group a revision of the draft text, in document TN/RL/W/276/Rev.1. As you know, this is the version of the text on which Ministers based their remarks at the Ministerial -level meeting of the TNC on 15 July. As you no doubt listened in carefully to our Ministers on 15 July at the TNC meeting at the Ministerial level, I will not repeat what was said during th at meeting. Instead, let me highlight some key political guidance from our Ministers that will help us plan our next steps. First, Ministers said that the current status quo of not having any disciplines is not an option, and that we need to bring the negoti ations to a meaningful, balanced and credible conclusion as soon as possible, well ahead of MC12. To make this happen, we need to develop as quickly as possible a clean text that all Members will be in a position to adopt. In practical terms, this means co mpleting our work by early November at the latest. To get to this point, Members need to engage in a solution -oriented mode, with the authority to engage flexibly in order to get to landing zones, efficiently. Another key message from last Thursday is th at the draft text is not perfect – many Ministers raised issues with specific aspects of the text. On some issues, gaps are larger than on others. But it was encouraging to hear Ministers engaging on the draft text. Clearly, as many Ministers said, we need to move to Member -led, text -based negotiations. Of course, that is the purpose of the draft text, something Members can use to pursue their positions in seeking amendments, additions or deletions. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 163 - So, we have an instruction to finish as soon as possible; we were told that Heads of Delegation should use the necessary flexibility to do so; and we have a draft text, which we now need to collectively improve to use on line -by-line negotiations. This brings me to my last point on our next steps. As we all are w ell aware, MC12 begins on 30 November and whatever outcome we produce here, Capitals will need enough time to review and deliberate about it. So effectively, we have September and October for this work. Given this short time, we can expect that our work du ring the fall will be intensive and at times uncomfortable. Clearly there is no time to lose. I am still consulting with delegations and groups on the details of how best to structure work in the fall, and I will circulate a communication on that toward th e end of next week. For today, I will provide a general outline of my ideas based on what I have heard so far. First, I intend to start work from 1 September with consultations in different formats with interested delegations; then commence the intensive t ext-based work not later than the week of 13 September, i.e., following Jeûne Genevois. Our engagement will have to be very different from what it has been to date if we are to deliver as Ministers expect. This means no more conceptual exchanges of views or reading of written statements of positions. The positions of all delegations are well -known. To make progress, we now must work exclusively on the basis of specific suggestions to add, delete or amend the language in the draft text, in ways that will in crease convergence and ultimately lead to a final consensus outcome. This work will be at the HoDs -level, to ensure that the needed authority to make compromises is present in the meeting room, bearing in mind that HoDs may need technical support from thei r experts. As Chair, I will be there to facilitate the discussions; but ultimately, it will be up to Members, in a 'give and take ' exercise, to find the landing zones that everyone can live with. Clearly, some parts of the current draft require more work t han others and I suggest that we start with these bigger -picture issues, and work on them until early October. Given the nature of these issues, I expect that we will need to work in different formats with different groups of Members depending on the issue . In order to ensure transparency, I would suggest holding open -ended meetings, also at the HoD -level, once or twice a week during this phase. At those meetings I would report on the ongoing work in smaller formats, and all delegations would have the oppor tunity to discuss all of the issues raised. On the specific issues to be addressed during this period, it is premature for me to suggest a definitive list but they will include the issues raised by many Ministers on 15 July, such as the issues of balance, special and differential treatment, and dist ant water fishing, as well as some elements not currently reflected in the draft text. The objective of this first stage would be to improve collectively the draft text to be used in the next stage, starting in early October, of line -by-line negotiations. From this point on, I expect we will be meeting in open -ended format every day to go through the text clause -by-clause with an aim of producing a clean text well before MC12. When I say "line -by- line" or "clause -by-clause" I do not necessarily mean start ing with the first line of Article 1. Which clause we start with will depend on work in September. To leave enough time for Capitals to consider the results of the work, I suggest that we aim to finish this second stage by late October. I would just recall here that I am still consulting with delegations on how we proceed in the fall, so what I have just outlined is subject to further refinement. And of course, how we proceed also depends on COVID -related developments and meetings of other WTO bodies. With that said, my plan is to distribute a suggested detailed work plan with a schedule of meetings for the first stage of work toward the end of next week. More broadly, let me underscore that this phase of the work will be time -intensive and will require flexibility and a high degree of engagement, particularly by HoDs. We will need to adapt our processes to be able to deliver "as soon as possible, ahead of MC12" as Ministers affirmed. This means using our time efficiently to make the needed progress on each i ssue and then move on. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 164 - Given this, whatever the anticipated schedule, we will need to be prepared to adjust it as we go along, and in accordance with the pace of our progress on different issues. To conclude my report, let me highlight that all delegation s have worked extremely hard to get to where we are today, but we are not done yet. Time is running out and there is still difficult work to be done, so we have a very busy schedule ahead of us. As I see it, this is good news. It means that we are close to getting it done and that we are in the final lap, where every step you take is harder than the one before. Our Ministers have given us the guidance on how to get there. I am confident that Members are up to the task of finally concluding these negotiation s. Before I conclude, let me share a personal thought. Unfortunately, the lack of recent successfully negotiated outcomes in the WTO, and several deadlines missed on these particular negotiations, seems to have contributed to creating a sense of comfort w ith failure; in my view, to a degree that we now fear success more than we fear failure. As I mentioned earlier, despite the ongoing need to bridge gaps amongst Members ' positions, a positive conclusion of the fisheries subsidies negotiations is within rea ch. We have two options in front of us: we either stick to our zones of comfort and fail yet again; or we act with boldness, pragmatism, and responsibility and reach success. In engaging in the upcoming stage of the negotiations, I would like to invite you to choose the latter . _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 165 - ORAL REPORT BY AMBASSADOR GLORIA ABRAHAM PERALTA (COSTA RICA), CHAIR OF THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND SUB -COMMITTEE ON COTTON I would like to say a few words on the latest developments in the agricultural negotiations. As you are aware, I circulated under my own responsibility my report on the state -of-play and way forward on 17 June in document JOB/AG/202 in which I sought to identify under each topic elements that could po tentially form the basis for an agreement at MC12. The report was discussed at our last CoA SS meeting on 21 and 24 June and was generally well received. As stated on many occasions in recent months, my intention remains to circulate a first draft text for a possible outcome at MC12 before the summer recess. In that regard, I intend to convene a last meeting of the CoA Special Session before the summer break on 29 July. The purpose of this meeting would be to introduce this first draft text, which will be prepared under my own responsibility. This draft text is intended to be a first step in the cr eating of a Ministerial agricultural outcome at MC12 to help Members embark on a focused text -based negotiation from September onwards. Therefore, the text is boun d to evolve with the discussions of Members. Following the indication by many Members in June that they were still in the process of preparing new submissions, I convened a CoA SS meeting and the Dedicated Sessions on PSH and SSM earlier this week to give them the opportunity to present these submissions and also to enable me to take them into account as I prepare my draft text for the consideration by Members. Not less than 11 submissions were on the agenda of these meetings that finally took place over 3 days - 19, 20 and 22 of July. The discussions were so intense and we did not have time to go through all the topics and I plan to reconvene next week the SSM dedicated discussion. The number of new submissions to which we should add a few others that Members have announced they would submit soon, and the intensity of the discussions constitute, without any doubt, an encouraging signal of Members' engagement. I am also encouraged by the 15 July Formal TNC meeting at Ministerial level on Fisheries Subsidies that demonstrated Members ' commitment to seriously engage to deliver multilateral outcomes by MC12. And it is fair to say that all Members also agree on the need for a credible an d meaningful agricultural outcome at MC12. Such an outcome would demonstrate WTO's ability to respond to key challenges facing the agriculture sector and prepare the ground for an intensive and successful post MC12 continuation of the agriculture negotiati ons. However, several major gaps in negotiating positions still need to be narrowed and, in particular, on the two priority issues: Domestic Support and PSH. This makes the finalization of a first draft text by the end of the month an extremely challenging task. My assessment of the state of play and possible way forward which will be reflected in this draft text and its subsequent revisions will be based only on Members' inputs and discussions. I will therefore need the support and cooperation of all of yo u in this exercise before and after the circulation of this draft text, to narrow the gaps and find balance, identify trade -offs and strike compromises. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 166 - To paraphrase Elon Musk, "if you are trying to produce a text, it is like baking a cake. You have to have all the ingredients in the right proportion." I am only the cook, but I need the proper ingredients and in the right proportion. In other words, this draft text will be more your collective text than mine. I will continue my consultations in the coming days and I call on Members to engage without any further due in a spirit of compromise and with a heightened sense of urgency. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 167 - ORAL REPORT BY AMBASSADOR KADRA AHMED HASSAN (DJIBOUTI), CHAIR OF THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRAD E AND DEVELOPMENT As you are aware, earlier this year, I launched a series of informal, open -ended meetings of the CTD SS. The purpose of these meetings, of which there were five in total, was to explore how to move forward on the ten proposals on special and differential treatment submitted by the G -90. In each meeting, delegations were asked to focus on two proposals, so that over the course of the five meetings, an in -depth discussion would have taken place on all ten proposals. In order to have a const ructive and focused series of meetings, I requested delegations to approach the discussion on each proposal on the basis of two questions. Delegations were firstly asked for their views on which elements of each proposal might convergence be found. They we re also asked to consider where the difficulties lie in each proposal and why, and how could these be overcome. The first in this series of meetings was held on 8 February and focused on the proposal concerning the Enabling Clause and the proposal concerni ng LDC accession. The second meeting, held on 12 March, focused on the proposals concerning the TRIMs Agreement and Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement. The third meeting was held on 27 April and focused on the proposals concerning the TBT Agreement and the Customs Valuation Agreement. The focus at the fourth meeting, held on 17 May, was on the proposals concerning the SPS Agreement and the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. And finally, on 18 June, the Committee focused on the proposal concerning Sections A and C of GATT Article XVIII, and the proposal concerning Section B of GATT Article XVIII. Though the discussions that took place in these meetings were useful to some extent, they triggered little in terms of substantive exchange on these proposals . I think that a greater engagement amongst Members would have been more fruitful. I therefore regret to report that, over the course of the five meetings, I did not see the level of engagement that I had hoped on the substance of the propo sals. On the one hand, the delegations that have concerns with these proposals are not willing to engage in discussions on substance, as they have stated that these proposals have already been considered before. On the other hand, while shedding further li ght on their proposals, the G -90 – along with some other Members – continue to believe that their proposals provide a good basis for taking the discussion further. At each of the five meetings, I strongly stressed the importance of finding a way forward in these negotiations, and in this light I encouraged delegations to work together to identify a new approach to the work in the CTD SS which would be acceptable to all. I also stressed that it is in the hands of Members to find this way forward. As Chair, I remain committed to convene meetings and facilitate as many discussions as are needed, but it is ultimately up to Members to show the necessary flexibility and political will to collaborate, so as to collectively determine how the work in the CTD SS can a dvance. In terms of next steps, my intention is to convene a formal meeting of the CTD SS soon after the summer break in September . This will allow Members to take stock, in a formal setting, of the work that took place in the first half of th is year. Such a meeting would also provide Members an opportunity to discuss what would need to be done in order to make progress in our discussions in the CTD SS. I would urge all Members to use the summer break to consider this stalemate seriously. It is my assessment that, unless there is real engagement on the substance by all Members, we will not be able to make the progress we need to see in order to have a concrete outcome on the G -90 proposals by MC12. I reiterate my call to Members. I am sure that t hey heard me in the informal meetings that it is important that they contribute to finding solutions on the way forward in these negotiations. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 168 - ORAL REPORT BY AMBASSADOR ZHANAR AITZHANOVA (KAZAKHSTAN), CHAIR OF THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN SERVICES I am pleased to provide this report to the TNC in my capacity as Chair of the Special Session of the Council for Trade in Services. In June, I invited delegations to consult with me so that I could hear their views on how they see our work on services addressed in the context of MC12. In those consultations, I discussed with groups and individual delegations representing over half of the Membership. I reported on those consultations at an informal meeting of the Special S ession on 30 June. My report was subsequently circulated as JOB/SERV/309. The consultations yielded three general take -aways, in my view: • First, there seemed to be a good level of convergence on the importance of GATS commitments and of working towards i mproved commitments in the context of the built -in agenda; • Second, the consultations revealed a good appreciation of the exploratory discussions that have taken place since MC11 and that there was good support for market access discussions to continue and even intensify after MC12. • Third, I heard a significant level of support for seeing services trade well addressed in a ministerial outcome document at MC12. On this last point, many delegations said they wished to see a specific paragraph on trade in se rvices . Elements mentioned by delegations in that regard included the following: • Underscoring the relevance of exploratory market access discussions undertaken; • Recognition of the pandemic's impact on services trade and of the role of services trade in facilitating resilience and supporting the economic recovery; • And, in that context, reaffirmation of the built -in agenda to improve commitments and revitalize work. At our meeting of 30 June, I invited interested delegations to put forward drafting suggestio ns as soon as possible, and indicated that I would convene a meeting early in September to allow Members to discuss any suggestions received. Chair, I hope that the membership will be able to find elements of convergence. That would of course depend on the type of language contemplated, and would only happen if a good dose of realism and pragmatism is exhibited. Naturally, I will continue to stand ready to assist as appropriate. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 169 - ORAL REPORT BY AMBASSADOR KOKOU YACKOLEY JOHNSON (TOGO) CHAIR OF THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BODY I will be very brief as my statement is not a report as such. However, it seemed important to remind delegations that the circumstances around the work of the DSB in Special Session have remained unchanged since my last report to the TNC in October 2020. At that time, I reported my assessment that delegations recognized it was unlikely to be productive to discuss improvements to D ispute Settlement procedures generally, as long as issues wi th the overall functioning of the dispute settlement system, arising from the debate around issues relating to the functioning of the Appellate Body, remained unresolved. I think all delegations will be aware that we are still awaiting concrete progress in this area, so the basic situation remains unchanged. That said, I would like to stress that I remain available to meet with any delegation wishing to discuss any issues relating to the work of the DSB in Special Session. If there is interest in such discussions, my door is open. To conclude I take this opportunity to appeal to all interested delegations on the need to reflect on finding a way to move forward on the work of DSB SS in connection with Appellate Body issues. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 170 - ANNEX 2 STATEM ENTS BY MEMBERS AT THE INFORMAL TNC AND INFORMAL HODS MEETINGS HELD ON 23 JULY 2021 Following the General Council Chairman's statement under Item 1 of the agenda of this meeting – "Report on Informal TNC and Informal HODs Meetings", the statements delivere d by: Uruguay (Informal Working Group on MSMEs) ; Australia (Joint Statement Initiative on Electronic Commerce and CAIRNS Group) ; Switzerland; Singapore; Ecuador; Pakistan; Japan; Nigeria; Mexico; Barbados (CARICOM) ; Argentina; Iceland (Informal Working Group on Trade and Gender) ; European Union; Indonesia; Brazil; Republic of Korea; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Arab Group) ; Norway; Panama (Article XII Members) ; China; New Zealand; Mauritius (African Group) ; Honduras; Costa Rica (Joint Initiative on S ervices Domestic Regulation) ; Russian Federation; Moldova; Chile (Structured Discussions on Investment Facilitation for Development) ; Nepal; United States; Sierra Leone; India; Canada (Structured Discussions on Trade and Environmental Sustainability and Ot tawa Group) ; Chinese Taipei; South Africa; Paraguay; Colombia; United Kingdom; Malaysia; Jamaica (ACP) ; Turkey; Bangladesh; Egypt; Chad (LDCs) ; Viet Nam; Peru; Vanuatu (Pacific Group) ; Thailand; Uganda and Cameroon; are included below as part of the Minute s of the General Council meeting. _______________ 1. Uruguay (Informal Working Group on MSMEs) I make this statement as coordinator of the Informal Working Group on MSMEs. Since our last HoDs meeting, the MSME Group met twice in an open -ended format on 4 May and 24 June. I am pleased to report that good progress has been achieved on the MSMEs draft Ministerial Declaration. We hope to finalise the declaration at our next meeting on Monday next week. The Declaration will take stock of the progress achieved since the establishment of the Group, in particular on the adoption of our December 2020 Package which is, in itself, a deliverable. It will also pave the way for future work. The implementation of the package is clearly a priority, but we are also thinking about new issues. Good discussions have taken place since the beginning of the year on various topics, including on innovation policies and how they can help MSMEs grow and trade, rural MSMEs ', trade digitalisation, MSMEs ' cyber -readiness, and low -value shipments. Besides the MSMEs Ministerial Declaration, a concrete MC12 deliverable will be the l aunch of the Trade4MSMEs platform. The platform looks to support MSMEs and policymakers by bringing trade related information together in one place and linking to reliable information resources. The platform will include guides for MSMEs and policymakers. The MSME group also launched a Digital Champions for Small Business initiative on MSME Day in June, with the partnership of the International Chamber of Commerce and the International Trade Centre. The initiative aims to support small business participatio n in international trade by helping them to go digital. Industry associations, chambers of commerce and NGOs with MSME and digitalisation focus, have been invited to submit proposals. The winners will be announced at MC12. These two initiatives reflect wel l the spirit in which we work. That is a spirit of pragmatism and a solution -oriented mode. As I have often said, the MSME Group is both a think -tank — incubator of ideas — but it is also a "do-tank". Our objective is to generate concrete deliverables th rough recommendations, soft law and tangible solutions to improve the participation of MSMEs in international trade. MSMEs are key economic actors, representing the vast majority of businesses in every economy, but they struggle to participate in internati onal trade and the current pandemic has had a devastating impact on them. Our next meeting will take place on Monday 28 July and is open to all interested Members. We hope that many of you will join us and support our work and our Ministerial Declaration. On this occasion, we will be honoured with the participation of WIPO Director -General, Mr. Daren Tang, to explore together synergies to help MSMEs. The more Members support our Ministerial Declaration, the stronger the message that we send to the world wil l be that the WTO and we, the governments, really care about small businesses, our economies and our people. 2. Uruguay Uruguay thanks the Director -General, the Chair of the General Council and the Chairs of the negotiating groups for their reports. I wis h to refer to what was said in the area of agriculture. As WT/GC/M/19 2 - 171 - we said in our meeting held on 21 June, the WTO cannot grant itself the luxury that agriculture simply be forgotten at MC12. We cannot come back with empty hands once again. That is the reason why I wish to launch an appeal to all Members, especially to the largest and most influential ones, to demonstrate the political will and constructive spirit needed if we want to go beyond the logjams. We want to be able to arrive at a result that is significa nt and credible to continue moving forward to reform the three pillars of the Agreement on Agriculture. Without prejudging the importance of transparency, we recogni ze that improvements must be part of a broader package at MC12. As we see it, the various p rerequisites and the formats for notifications would not be a significant breakthrough required from this organi zation, after six years without having a breakthrough in agriculture. Especially, looking at the situation, some Members are adjusting the requi rements to their own needs without contributing in a very effective way to heighten transparency. Uruguay does not believe that the presentation of proposals which are unbalanced or maximalist, at this time of the process, would be conducive to arriving at a consensus to bring a home a multilateral result; a result which is absolutely necessary for developing countries. On domestic support, we must have an agreement that sets forth an objective that has clear principles and parameters , so that we can have a limitation and reduction of the levels that are authorized for domestic support. Of course, this is distorting production and trade, as it was already agreed upon a long time ago. On JOB/AG/177/Rev.2, this is the strongest basis through which we can arr ive at such a result. We stand ready to work together with other Members to find the way forward and to address all the various concerns and needs within this approach. At the same time, we hope that MC12 will also be the time when we can lay the foundatio n to give a new impetus to negotiations on market access in the run up to MC13. To have the framework for negotiations presented by Uruguay and other Members , is the proper basis to bring forward negotiations on this theme. That is a high priority to our d elegation. Another theme that should be part of the package is a decision on purchases for humanitarian purposes and the application of restrictions for exports. This initiative was defended by the authorities of humanitarian agencies and it should not, in any way, stand in the way of an agreement on the basis of the breakthroughs reached in 2020, without linking this to other themes. This is a modest package, but this is the minimum level of ambition that we need, as we see it, to be seen as being credib le and taken seriously by the rest of the international community. When it comes to the other areas, any advancement on public stockholding and a special safeguard mechanism must have a level of ambition which is in keeping with market access and domestic support. In the current situation, it seems it will be difficult to have a permanent solution for public stockholding in the time we have ahead of us between now and November. The divergence of views that we see, and the lack of sufficient information on the programmes that are in force, have been pointed out time and tim e again. Uruguay considers that we can have a lasting solution that would give rise to a broadening of what was agreed upon in Bali. This perpetual clause , without robust measures on safeguards or transparency , would be a blank check because there can be d istortion for both production and trade. Finally, we wish to underscore the fact that any results on agriculture at MC12 must presuppose steps forward and not back -pedalling when it comes to the reform mandated in the Agreement on Agriculture, and seeking to set up an agriculture system that is well - adjusted to the market and fair regarding the progressive reduction in the level of support and protection. I wish to refer to the theme of fisheries subsidies. With regard to this negotiation, we have the strong commitment of Members that posited their commitment to be able to finish up the negotiations, and this before MC12. This means reconciling different technical, legal and political differences. This is a very arduous undertaking. We will have to get rea dy for an intensive period of line-by-line negotiations. We wish to support the work programme of Ambassador Wills to arrive at a text which, in fine, will make it possible for the negotiations to be successful. We can only find a viable solution if we dec ide to eschew very extreme positions. We have to comply with our mandate. It is only by shared dissatisfaction that we can give rise to success. 3. Australia (Joint Statement Initiative on Electronic Commerce) Co-Convenors ' Report on E -Commerce I will first provide a report on work under the Joint Statement Initiative on Electronic Commerce on behalf of the co -convenors: Australia, Japan and Singapore. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 172 - Momentum in the negotiations remains strong, and we have made good progress since our last report in May. We have now cleaned or virtually cleaned six articles. At our most recent plenary meeting, just yesterday, participants welcomed clean text achieved in e -contracts, and nearly clean text achieved in online consumer protection and in open gove rnment data. We also ‘parked’ text on transparency, subject to the final legal structure. We also met on 20 May and 21 June. Our 20 May meeting included constructive discussions on data flows and localisation, and reflected broad recognition that these i ssues should be addressed in the JSI. Our 21 June discussion included positive discussions on legal architecture. There was wide agreement that a range of viable legal pathways exist for integrating outcomes into the WTO framework, including the use of G ATS and GATT schedules and Annex 4. The plenary meetings also included updates from small groups to ensure transparency. Looking ahead, we will issue an updated consolidated text in coming weeks, and will hold monthly plenary meetings in the second half of the year. Small groups will remain an important tool for driving progress. The JSI remains open, transparent and inclusive: meetings are open to all WTO Members and papers are available on the WTO portal. I would like to thank all JSI participants for their hard work and the progress achieved so far this year, and I look forward to more good progress as we approach MC12. 4. Australia ( Cairns Group ) Reform in agriculture is a priority for the majority of WTO Members, as seen today and as we have seen for many years. On 23 June, Australia' s Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment chaired a meeting of Cairns Group Ministers. Cairns Group Ministers underlined that it is essential for MC12 to deliver an ambitious, concrete and equitable outcome in ag riculture. Ministers reinforced their commitment to making progress in all three pillars of the Agreement on Agriculture – domestic support, market access and export competition – with a view to ensuring a balanced and progressive reform process and a leve l playing field for trade in agriculture. Cairns Group Ministers called for a Ministerial Decision at MC12 that addresses agricultural trade - and production -distorting domestic support. Ministers noted that the Ministerial Decision must be of sufficient ambition and specificity to enable meaningful reform of trade - and production -distorting domestic support entitlements. To this end, Ministers of the Cairns Group underscored that the Framework for Negotiations on Domestic Support should be the basis for t his Decision. 5. Australia There is no question that MC12 represents the best chance in several years to secure some significant wins on the board for our organi zation. For Australia' s part, we 're confident that a multilateral package on fisheries subsidies negotiations, agriculture, COVID -19 response and a new process on WTO reform is well within our reach. On agriculture, beyond the Cairns Group statement just made now, we look forward to the Chair 's draft text next week and are committ ed to working with other Members to ensure MC12 makes a meaningful step forward on domestic support. We will be pragmatic, but our patience is not unlimited. On our COVID -19 response, at this week 's successful High-Level Dialogue on vaccines, stakeholders again made clear that there are several trade barriers that are impeding the global pandemic response, particularly the manufacture and distribution of crucial vaccines, including tariffs, exports restrictions and trade facilitation. The recently revised Trade and Health Initiative makes a significant WT/GC/M/19 2 - 173 - contribution to the MC12 package on this subject and we urge all members to join the growing list of cosponsors. On fisheries subsidies, we are committed to reaching an out come ahead of MC12 – for the sake of global fish stocks, which are declining rapidly. For this same reason we must ensure that the disciplines on harmful subsidies do not include significant carve -outs, to ensure they will help rebuild, rather than worsen, global fish stocks. In addition to these multilateral outcomes, the joint statement initiative on services domestic regulation is now very close to conclusion, particularly in light of the recent positive announcement from the US this week. We can and s hould reap that harvest. Of course , MC12 also needs to set up the organi zation for a stronger future. We need to chart a reform path that will ensure we can restore a fully functioning and binding dispute settlement system as soon as possible. We need a r eform path that establishes rule making through plurilaterals as a central part of our work. A new process on these issues is essential, and we should ensure it is an inclusive one, to ensure we can all contribute our voice in this organi zation's future. 6. Switzerland Today, we have less than three months to work until the 12th Ministerial Conference. Great efforts are still needed in all areas to achieve concrete results. Under these circumstances, it is important that we agree now on the objectives and priority issues. Our goal should be to achieve meaningful results on a limited number of issues and to provide a positive perspective for the future work of the WTO. This will allow us to refocus on the most promising issues and objectives after the summer break. There are two priority issues for the Ministerial Conference: First, finalizing an agreement on fisheries subsidies to implement a critical sustainable development goal and second, to develop a tangible and sustainable WTO response to the global health crisis that has severely affected our lives and economies. In our view, this response is a holistic approach to effectively address the pandemic and fend off future health crises. On the other issues, the levels of ambition need to be adjusted in l ight of progresses achieved so far. Decisions at the Ministerial Conference could take the form of immediate outcomes, political commitments or work programs. A common understanding of the way forward after MC12 will also be particularly important for syst emic issues, including WTO reform and dispute settlement. We also support making permanent the tariff moratorium on electronic transmissions. In addition, we look forward to making concrete progress on all Joint Statement Initiatives. The conclusion of ne gotiations on domestic regulations in services is within reach and would send a strong and positive signal. Since we do not know the conditions under which the Ministerial Conference will take place, basic foresight requires that we present the Ministers with mature and stabilized draft decisions. In summary, Madam Chair, we need to prioritize and focus our work after the summer break on the most crucial issues. In a pandemic context, we must also strive to finalize draft decisions as soon as possible. 7. Singapore Thank you Chair, for providing clear direction and focus for today’s meeting. I recall that during one of your first meetings at the CBFA in May 2021, you quoted an old Nigerian proverb, which I will attempt to paraphrase as follows: “if you do not know your destination, you would not know what road to take”. Fortunately for us, we do know the destination. The short -range destination for the WTO is MC12 while the long -range destination for Members is to ensure that the WTO remains re levant and fit - for-purpose to address 21st century challenges. But to get to these destinations, Members must WT/GC/M/19 2 - 174 - answer two key questions honestly. One, does every Member agree that these are the destinations that we are all committed to arrive at. Two, what are the roads or pathways that will lead us to these destinations? In other words, how do we get there? Let me share three thoughts. First, I would like to believe that every Member agrees that the success of MC12 should be our short - term destination. Of course, much will depend on how we define “success”, but as DG Ngozi has consistently emphasised, there must be deliverables in at least two key areas, namely, fisheries subsidies negotiations and WTO response to the COVID -19 pandemic. It is evident from the 15 July Ministerial TNC Meeting that while deep differences remain among Members, there was also a palpable sense of purpose to deliver an outcome in fisheries subsidies negotiations. It is equally clear that Members must deliver a meaningful outcome o n WTO response to the COVID -19 pandemic. We have in place a process in the form of Ambassador David Walker as Facilitator, and we also have a sound foundation in room document RD/GC/14. As the crisis of a generation, Members must realise that not having an y outcome at MC12 will be the worst outcome of all as it will further call into question the relevance of the WTO. Second, Members must cast our eyes beyond the MC12 horizon and look at the long -range destination of what a WTO, which is fit -for-purpose f or the 21st century, will look like. In my mind’s eyes, I envisage a WTO that can do three things. One, a WTO that can formulate trade rules in new and emerging areas like digital trade, trade and environmental sustainability and trade and health. Two, a W TO that has an effective and efficient two -tier dispute settlement system so that it can discharge its adjudicatory function. Three, a WTO that can effectively carry out its monitoring function by promoting transparency and expanding free and fair internat ional trade. This is the only way for the WTO to continue to remain as the backbone of the multilateral trading system. Third, if Members agree that these are our short -range and long -range destinations, then we must commit to an intensive post -Summer wor k programme, exercise real flexibility and avoid megaphone negotiations to achieve meaningful deliverables as soon as possible, ahead of MC12. In the longer term, Members must avoid sacrificing the systemic interests of the WTO at the altar of narrow natio nal interests. Ultimately, Members must build greater trust among ourselves and avoid adopting a zero -sum approach in our negotiations. Instead of win -lose, we should strive to achieve win-win outcomes that will deliver concrete benefits to our citizens an d strengthen the WTO. Time is running out, and we must redouble our efforts ahead of MC12. The road ahead may be long and winding, but we can get to our destinations if we work together. 8. Ecuador Director General, Ecuador expects results from the Mini sterial Conference in November, we must prove that the multilateral trading system is relevant in the current international context, where the economy and trade are suffering from the impact of COVID -19. Our priorities: Fisheries subsidies We thank and c ongratulate the Chair of the negotiating group, Ambassador Santiago Wills, for the work he has done. With respect to these negotiations, Ecuador reiterates its commitment to them and its willingness to reach an agreement that fulfils the mandate as soon as possible. Therefore, in order to be constructive, it supports the use of document RD/TN/RL/276 /Rev.1 as the basis for future work. The issues must be addressed in a holistic and inclusive manner since all the elements covered by these negotiations are interlinked. Thus, given the short time we have to reach an agreement, we call for work to begin promptly on the phase of genuine, text -based negotiations in which concrete and effective decisions are taken. When developing the discipline s, Ecuador considers it essential that the specific realities of each Member should be taken into account, particularly of those which, like Ecuador, see fisheries as a development tool and an opportunity to improve the lives of many people, men and women, mainly with limited resources, who make a living from this activity. Therefore, equitable and effective special and differential treatment, as well as adequate technical and capacity building assistance, are indispensable elements for the final outcome of these negotiations. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 175 - It is well known that Ecuador considers it fundamental that the disciplines of this agreement include guarantees for artisanal fishing, given the high socio -economic sensitivity of the fisheries sector in all countries and considering that it has been demonstrated time and again that the harmful subsidies granted to industrial fishing have led to the critical situation of the seas. Agriculture We congratulate the Chair of the Committee on Agriculture in Special Session (COA SS) on the work done in the complex task entrusted to her. Currently, making progress in the negotiations is largely dependent on Members' political choices and ability to listen to other people's opinions. Despite our efforts, it is still like talking to a wall. It is not realistic or constructive that, after months of intensive work, the focus remains on achieving only transparency outcomes. We must remain ambitious, there is sufficient technical evidence on the need for a genuine and thorough review of all the s ubparagraphs on domestic support, including Annex II. The mandates are clear and market access is part of one of them. This pillar, which is this organization's raison d'être, must not be neglected. As has already been pointed out by Uruguay, the proposa l for a framework for negotiations (JOB/AG/198), submitted by Ecuador together with other Members, is a suitable basis for further discussions on this issue, which is a top priority for my delegation. Health and Trade We thank Ambassador Walker, as the f acilitator of the WTO response to the pandemic, as well as Ambassadors Tan and Spencer for their work in support of this important process. Ecuador advocates the active management of the organization and its reform so that it can play a leading role in th e recovery of international trade in the post pandemic era and, of course, we must first address the immediate public health emergencies. This is a matter for all WTO Members and we therefore hope that any discussion on this topic will be inclusive and tr ansparent, and that the views of vaccine importing countries, like Ecuador, will be reflected in any document. In the short term, we need to try to remove any trade barrier that prevents access to medical equipment, and in particular to vaccines against COVID -19. It will take us years to beat this health crisis; by thinking about future pandemics we are dealing with this crisis, in the short term. In addition to other points already raised by Ecuador and other countries of the region on several occasions, I would like to stress the need for the immediate or prompt elimination of all restrictions on exports of COVID -19 vaccines and their components. Those that are in place must be notified. There must be full commitment to prohibit any future rest riction on COVID -19 vaccine exports and their components. The current proposals on this issue are not sufficient and should be strengthened, in line with the language used to avoid agriculture export restrictions. Joint initiatives and Working Groups Ecuador values the different negotiating approaches that, in this forum, have enabled us to move forward on issues on the current global agenda and, in this connection, we note with great interest the evolution of the negotiations on investment facilitation, SMEs, e -commerce and gender. 9. Pakistan Chair, given recent events, it would be appropriate for us to address the issue of fisheries first. We appreciate all efforts to bring together Ministers and their representatives in a virtual Ministerial meeting to take stock of the negotiations and discuss a way forward. Reports from the event especially in some of the press, tend to celebrate a move towards conclusion and showcase elements WT/GC/M/19 2 - 176 - suggesting an agreement on various elements. While it is no doubt good to b e optimistic, such reports tend to gloss over some fundamental issues that the Ministers have highlighted in their responses to the questions. Speaking for my own Minister and having heard many others, some of those fundamental issues, if not resolved, hav e the potential to threaten any outcome on this subject. To quote from my Minister’s statement, "without effective, unconditional, and undiluted flexibilities in all areas of disciplines, except for illegal fishing, a conclusion of the agreement would be in jeopardy. Unfortunately, the present draft text makes special and differential treatment conditional upon transparency requirements and dilutes it to something only notional in effect. This approach can severely limit our progress ". Chair, while recogni sing that small scale and artisanal fishermen are important, reports from the Ministerial suggest this was agreed as a form of special and differential treatment . To be sure, we heard many voices in the room calling for this type of fishing to remain outsi de the scope of disciplines as they do not fall within the mandate and are not harmful. Allow me to seek clarity today from the membership, as my Minister did on the 15th, on what exactly do we mean by the oft -quoted "sustainability mandate "? We find that it is used quite often to limit the scope of special and differential treatment but also to create allowances for large -scale, industrial fishing activities that are actually harmful. To be sure, no such mandate of allowing subsidies for overcapacity and overfishing in the name of sustainability has been mentioned in SDG 14.6 or in any other mandate. Sustainability requires polluters to pay, and pay first. It requires the harmful to be limited and the not harmful to be allowed for the sake of sustainable l ivelihoods and a sustainable environment. To conclude on fisheries Chair, while we seem to be getting a text together for agreement, imbalances in the text are quite stark, differences on fundamental issues remain, and disagreement on core disciplines fo r sustainability and development is still entrenched. We, therefore, believe that if we are to conclude a meaningful and high -quality agreement on fisheries subsidies, which is definitely Pakistan' s objective, we should listen to everyone and thrash out th e sticking points in a realistic manner. Ignoring not one, but several elephants in the room, will not lead to a good conclusion and we must not let our haste at this stage make waste of the progress made. At the same time , Director -General , Pakistan appreciates your proactive initiative on TA for implementing whatever disciplines we might eventually come up with, and your efforts to design an instrument in consultation with both potential beneficiaries and donors. But as I mentioned earlier no amount of TA, no matter how well designed can overcome any structural impediments that an agreement may create in the development of such sectors in developing countries. Turning from saving fish to saving human lives, Chair, we remind Members that desp ite the high rate of vaccination and apparent return to normalcy in a few countries, the pandemic is far from over. The new delta variant is proving to be deadlier than all those before it. The need for immediate, affordable, and equitable access to C OVID -19 vaccines, along with other essential medicines and equipment can no longer be ignored. Cosponsors had presented a comprehensive revised proposal for a waiver from certain TRIPS obligations that would allow scaling up of production and availability of such vaccines and products. It was heartening to note that the membership had agreed to enter into text -based negotiations in order to pass this waiver. Unfortunately, certain delegations still seem reluctant to engage with the text and continue to stall the discussions with preliminary questions which have been answered in writing and orally in a thorough manner. At the same time, Chair, we wish to appreciate your attempts as Director -General to provide leadership on this issue and find every possible solu tion to the current situation. On our part, we have maintained that Pakistan is open to all solutions that would help contribute to the scaling up, and affordable and equitable access of vaccines and other equipment. We feel that each proposal must be valu ed and examined on its merit and a combination of approaches is workable. Similarly, in agriculture, Pakistan remains concerned that the existing anomalies in the Agreement must be addressed. Without very large subsidisers agreeing to cut domestic support first, movement will be difficult. Livelihood and food security concerns in developing countries continue to mount in wake of the pandemic and, therefore, the need for levelling the playing field in agriculture trade remains paramount. Spe cific entitlements for developing countries and interests of NFIDCs must not be swept away and should rather constitute the main element. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 177 - In conclusion Chair, we remain hopeful and extend our faith in the membership to deliver on the objectives of sustain able development – manifested in higher standards of living, achieved through a structural transformation of our economies, greater technological capabilities, and production capacities. This, leading up to MC12, must remain the cornerstone of our activiti es and the end result of our endeavours. This is true for all negotiations and discussions on reforming the organi zation. We hope that we make 2021 truly memorable by following a more developmental approach at the WTO. 10. Japan Fisheries negotiation At the Ministerial TNC Meeting on fisheries subsidies, WTO Members successfully expressed their commitments toward concluding the negotiation as soon as possible before MC12. Based on these commitments, it is our task to go back to text -based negotiations immed iately to narrow down the gaps in the text. Our time is limited. We have to find a landing zone, with the mindset that all Members should contribute appropriately to marine sustainability through disciplines on fish stocks that each Member is responsible f or. Japan is ready to continue intensive negotiations toward achieving this goal. Pandemic It is crucial for the WTO to deliver a concrete outcome on its response to COVID -19 at MC12. We greatly appreciate Ambassador Walker’s efforts as the facilitator. At MC12, we should agree on a Ministerial Declaration as well as a Ministerial Decision on health that holistically include important factors, in particular, trade facilitation, export restrictions, production expansion of C OVID -19 vaccines and therapeutic s, and intellectual property. This will ensure that the WTO can contribute, not only to responding to the current crisis, but also to preparing for future pandemics. We believe that the draft General Council Declaration on Trade and Health (WT/GC/W/823), with fifty-two co -sponsors including Japan, will be a good basis for the MC12 outcome. We call for Members to support this draft Declaration. Agriculture Addressing export restrictions on foodstuffs is critical in our response to the global crisis. As t he world 's second largest net food importer, Japan has serious concerns that export restrictive measures negatively affect other Members ' food security and global agricultural trade in time of crisis. Japan, with like -minded Members, submitted a concrete p roposal (JOB/AG/207) to enhance transparency and clarify rules on export restrictions at MC12. We must work hard to ensure that the WTO plays a leading role in building a more crisis -resilient world economy. Achieving an outcome in the area of transparenc y at MC12 is another priority. Some say it lacks ambition, but I can say that it is a basis for ambition. Transparency -related issues are a cross -cutting prerequisite to negotiations. Any negotiations on new rules would require, as a first step, the buildi ng of common understanding based on available transparent data and facts. Today, the E uropean Union, the U nited States, Canada and Japan will submit a proposal for transparency improvements in agriculture, and we strongly hope it will be the basis for a re alistic and ambitious outcome at MC12. Transparency/Notification As for the WTO reform, enhancing transparency and strengthening notification requirements is one area where we hope to achieve a concrete outcome by MC12. As one of the proponents, Japan h as put forward a draft General Council Decision (JOB/GC/204/Rev.6) to the General Council next week. The proposal incorporates a series of improvements in response to Members ' comments, and we invite Members to give it their consideration and support it to improve transparency. Dispute settlement The reform of the WTO dispute settlement system remains a matter of urgency. At MC12, we must show progress toward restoring the proper functioning of the dispute settlement system. Members WT/GC/M/19 2 - 178 - should soon restart discussions to this end, including on how to a ddress the concerns surrounding the Appellate Body. JSIs Japan has high hopes for achieving tangible results on the Joint Statement Initiatives at MC12. We can expect to conclude negotiations on services domestic regulation. On e -commerce, Japan, as one of the co -conveners, would like to facilitate and intensify negotiations on key issues such as cross - border data flow, while bearing in mind various challenges faced by developing Members. We also hope to see substantial progress in investment facilitatio n. Other issues (environmental sustainability, LPF) Trade and environmental sustainability is one area that will require greater attention from Members in the run up to MC12. Japan believes that the WTO should contribute to global carbon neutrality, including through both tariff elimination and rule -making on regulatory issues. Last but not least, Japan continues to place emphasis on ensuring a level playing field, including strengthened rules on industrial subsidies, SOEs, and forced technology transf er. We would like to promote this important agenda here at the WTO. 11. Nigeria Nigeria wishes to thank you and the Chair of the General Council and the Heads of respective negotiating Group for your respective reports and efforts in advancing respective ne gotiations. At the outset, we wish to associate ourselves with the statements delivered on behalf of the African Group and the ACP. Chair, let me begin by congratulating you, and the Membership for successfully organizing the 15 July Ministerial Trade Negotiations Committee virtual meeting (TNC) on Fisheries Subsidies. We believe with intensified engagement in respective negotiations, Members would be able to make the progress that is required to deliver MC12 outcomes on respective iss ues that would speed up post COVID economic recovery, and support building of resilient economies. Nigeria looks forward to fair, balanced, and equitable MC 2 outcomes on issues such as Fisheries Subsidies, Agriculture, C OVID -19 response, WTO Reform, DSU, TRIPS, E -Commerce, Trade and Development and other JSIs such as MSMES, Services D omestic Regulation at MC12. However, we envisaged that some of these issues will have ministerial decision outcome while others will have developed work programme for post MC12. The outcomes should reflect a balance of the issues of interest to Members and views; balance in terms of political perspectives; and Members ' development priorities. On fisheries subsidies, we will continue to show requisite flexibilities so we can co llectively achieve balanced outcomes consistent with SDG 14.6 and our mandate. We have taken note of some positive modifications in the revised Draft Consolidated Text of 30th June 2021. Though the text is not perfect, we believe the basic elements of the landing zones contained therein would foster requisite discussions towards timely delivery of outcomes consistent with the mandate. On the issue of special and differential treatment , we believe artisanal and small -scale fishers are not responsible for the rapid depletion of global marine fish stocks, and in our view, they should be excluded from the scope of application of the discipline. However, we are flexible on this issue, and we share the views of some Members that a key component of special and diff erential treatment is for poor and vulnerable artisanal fishers in developing country Members and LDC Members. Nevertheless, the final outcomes should also take into account the need for policy space for some developing countries to develop their fisheries sector. On agriculture, we are of the view that the negotiations should be approached from a development perspective, so we can achieve outcomes that address the structural causes of food and livelihood insecurity and foster the building of resilient agricultural sector. The African Group ha s tabled some proposals in the COA -SS that we believe will foster discussions towards the delivery of balanced and development -oriented outcomes. These proposals are: (i) COVID -19 and the Food Security Crisis Calls for urgent Action at the WTO - Elements of a Food Security and Livelihoods Agenda; (ii) Draft Ministerial Decision on Domestic Support: Disciplines on Final Bound AMS Entitlements; (iii) Draft Ministerial Decision on Permanent Solution on Public Food Stockhol ding (Peace Clause Plus) and (iv) Draft Ministerial Decision for Delivering on a Special Safeguard Mechanism for Developing Country WT/GC/M/19 2 - 179 - Members. We call on Members to engage constructively so we can collectively achieve fair, equitable and balanced MC 12 outco mes on agriculture. On development, we wish to register our appreciation for the tireless efforts of the Chair of the CTD SS in advancing the discussions on the 10 Agreement -specific special and differential treatment proposals of the G -90. We believe the revised special and differential treatment proposals tabled by the G90 are critical to increasing trade opportunities of developing countries and LDCs, speed up their post -COVID economic recovery, and support building resilient economies. We therefore cal l on developed countries to engage constructively in the discussions of this proposal and refrain from frustrating the discussions as well as the adoption of the proposal. We encourage the membership to engage constructively on these issues so we can achie ve meaningful outcomes. Madam Chair, Members must do everything possible to address the impasse of A ppellate Body and ensure that the DSU is fully back to function very well. Regarding the Work Programme on Electronic Commerce , Nigeria look s forward to the adoption of an inclusive MC12 agenda that is geared towards addressing the difficulties undermining the gains of developing countries from global digital trade. In conclusion Chair, Nigeria is pleased with the progress being recorded in t he ongoing open, transparent, and inclusive discussions under the respective Joint Statement Initiatives. We are confident that the outcomes of these initiatives will take into account our development priorities and avail us the requisite tool s to further unlock our economic potentials. We therefore call on all Members , especially developing countries , to join these initiatives so we can collectively shape the discussions and deliver development -oriented outcomes. 12. Mexico Let me begin by thanking the Chair s of the various negotiating groups and the coordinators of the Joint Initiatives for their reports on the status of the discussions. I would also like to thank you, Madam Chair, for your report and your analysis of the situation. We agree with you that, less than three months before MC12, we need to work with real pragmatism and devote our efforts and limited time, to issues that enjoy a greater degree of convergence. We cannot allow ourselves the luxury, yet again, of a Ministerial Conference with no out come, even more so when we had four years to work on it. In this regard, the recent Meeting of the Trade Negotiations Committee at Ministerial Level on Fisheries Subsidies has provided us with a number of lessons, including: • While the text is considere d the basis for the negotiations, there are still major, if not conflicting, differences of opinion among some Members on particular topics; • If we do not show the necessary flexibility and limit ourselves to pointing out only what is impossible for us t o accept, we will not be able to move forward and conclude these negotiations before MC12; and, • The virtual format meant that real interaction among ministers, which might have allowed us to find common ground, was not possible. This is something about what we need to reflect on in the run up to MC12. I think it is timely and necessary to commend the Chair of the Negotiating Group on Rules, Ambassador Santiago Wills, who has persevered and made considerable efforts to provide us with a text which, as I said, is a good basis for the negotiations. With regard to agriculture, despite the efforts of both Ambassador Abraham and the various facilitators, it has become clear that the divergent positions expressed mean that we must lower our expectations of an outcome at MC12 and that we should perhaps think about how to shape a future agenda. On services, Mexico is in favour of any Ministerial outcome that includes a statement recognizing the importance of trade in services and the fundamental role it plays in supporting economic growth, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 180 - which is key to efforts to build resilience and stimulate the economic recovery in the wake of the pandemic. On the matter of Joint Initiatives, we believe that services domestic regulation is a serious contender and that it is time to clean up the few square brackets that remain in the text. Major progress has also been made on e -commerce and investment facilitation. Madam Chair, Mexico cannot envision an MC12 without a clear commitment to solving the current dispute settlem ent system crisis. It is time to take a step forward on this issue, which has already lasted for more than two years and at each DSB meeting, 121 WTO Members request that the processes to fill the Appellate Body vacancies be launched. It is time to act res ponsibly. The dispute settlement mechanism puts all of us in this organization on a level playing field. It is undeniable that trade has an important role to play in the post pandemic economic recovery and the fight against COVID -19, and MC12 offers an op portunity to demonstrate that. The Trade and Health initiative, which is already sponsored by 53 members, together with the elements that emerged from consultations led by Ambassadors Spencer and Tan, which will be combined with Ambassador Walker's consult ations, are an important step in this direction and can form a good basis for multilateral discussions. Lastly, the summer break offers us an opportunity to reflect on what each of us from our trenches can do to promote the system and seek ways to transla te political commitments into concrete actions in Geneva. You can count on our delegation to work, as we have always done, to strengthen our system and deliver positive results. 13. Barbados (CARICOM) This statement is delivered on behalf of the CARICOM Gr oup. The Group aligns itself with the statement to be delivered by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP Group. We wish to thank the various Chairs for their reports and updates. We appreciate the efforts of Ambassador Santiago Wills in steering our work in the Neg otiating Group on Rules to advance these longstanding negotiations as we look ahead to MC12. We also wish to applaud the leadership of the Director -General in convening the TNC Ministerial meeting held on 15 July and for providing our Ministers with the ti mely opportunity to address the Membership directly on their priorities, core concerns and commitments in these negotiations. We reiterate the commitment of our Ministers to continue our proactive and constructive engagement in these negotiations as we press towards a balanced agreement that is a win-win for all of us. In this regard, we wish to underscore some of our key concerns. CARICOM member states rely heavily on the maritime jurisdictions and require policy space to ensure that all their marine resources contribute to their current and future sustainable economic growth and development, given the small landmass of the region. Small and vulnerable economies (SVEs) are not amongst the major subsidisers and have a negligeable impact . CARICOM states continue to strongly advocate for the inclusion of an appropriate de minimis exception from the Article 5 prohibitions for small developing fishing nations. Also, CARICOM's artisanal and small -scale fishing take place both within and beyon d twelve nautical miles. Thus, an exemption granted to artisanal and small -scale fishing should extend beyond the territorial seas to include EEZs. On agriculture, we acknowledge and applaud the work of the Chair of the Committee on Agriculture in Special Session, for the dedicated and steady work in this critical area. Agriculture continues to make vital contributions to the economies of CARICOM states with respect to GDP, employment, exports, food and security, and livelihood. The ongoing pandemic, our p ersistent exposure to natural disasters and the effect of climate change continues to expose the vulnerability of our agriculture sector and the need for adequate policy space to build the sector's resilience. Looking towards the Ministerial, we fully supp ort an outcome which allows us to maintain the status quo with respect to Article 6.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture. Moreover, whilst we appreciate the importance of achieving outcomes in the areas of transparency and notifications, our interests are muc h broader than these areas. Accordingly, having recourse to a special safeguard mechanism which responds favourably to our desire to increase domestic production to improve food security is critical. Furthermore, we call for progress on public stockholding for food security purposes and trade distorting domestic support. We will continue our constructive engagement on all issues and remind Members to take into account the unique circumstance on which countries like ours operate. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 181 - Regarding e -commerce, we th ank the Chair of the General Council for consulting extensively with Members in recent months, paving the way for us to begin constructive discussions on the Work Programme and the moratorium in the lead up to MC12. The issues selected for discussion at Structured Discussions held on 5 July are important and timely. We thank the WTO Secretariat for the presentations on considerations on electronic transmissions under the Work Programme for the last two decades, as well as those Members who shared their nati onal experiences relating to their internal non -discriminatory taxes on electronic transmissions. The CARICOM Group is also pleased to have the opportunity to share perspectives on e -commerce challenges and opportunities in the context of the COVID -19 pand emic and also to identify specific areas on which support would be welcome. We look forward to the resumption of these structured discussions following the summer break and commit to fully engage in this important dialogue. The group is cautiously optimist ic that a good faith dialogue in the period ahead can lead to tangible progress and, at the first instance, mutually agreeable recommendations on the Work Programme and the moratorium for the consideration of Ministers at MC12. On services, the services s ector contributes approximately up to 75% of the GDP of CARICOM states. However, some of the subsectors on which the region heavily relies on, such as tourism, are sensitive to the impacts of natural disasters, climate change and other exogenous shocks, su ch as the pandemic that we are currently facing. Any outcome which emanates from MC12 must focus on positioning and repositioning the services sector of developing countries and LDCs on a path of recovery and growth. We therefore call on Members to share t heir experiences with a view to identifying areas of good practices with respect to recovery, growth and resilience. We also call on Members to be open to provide technical assistance and capacity building (TACB) to support developing countries and LDCs in strengthening their services sector. On reform, we reiterate the importance that CARICOM assigns to preserving the principle of Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) for developing countries that are Members of the organi zation. Our interest is in mai ntaining access to SDT within the WTO. In this regard, we cannot support any proposal which seeks to weaken our access to SDT, including limiting SDT almost exclusively to income -based criteria, transition periods and TACB. We also wish to renew our call f or the urgent resolution of the blockage to the appointment process of the Appellate Body. We are prepared to play a constructive role in discussions on proposed reforms to strengthen the functioning of the appellate mechanism and broader dispute settlemen t reform. Other areas of reform such as the strengthening of the legislative and transparency aspects of the organi zation also remain important to us. We take note of the work being done under the responsibility of the Director -General as well as Member -led discussions. The ongoing COVID -19 pandemic is unlike anything we have seen in our lifetime. CARICOM member states are still reeling from the impact of the pandemic. We look on with dismay, as rates of vaccination remain as low as 6% in some of our membe r states. The WTO has a role to play in ensuring that all countries have access to vaccines, therapeutics and treatments for COVID -19. CARICOM calls on WTO Members to be open to all possible solutions to combat the pandemic, including unblocking supply cha ins, enhancing manufacturing capacity and also invoking appropriate intellectual property flexibilities. Members should uphold their transparency and notification obligations and refrain from imposing export and other restrictions which deny other countrie s fair and equitable access to COVID -19 vaccines, therapeutics and treatments. We should also be mindful that the solutions that we identified to combat the current pandemic are likely to serve as a blueprint for a response to future health crises. Finally , CARICOM stands ready to work with the Director - General and the entire Membership to deliver meaningful outcomes at MC12. We have to demonstrate to the rest of the world that the WTO remains relevant and that it belongs rightfully alongside other importan t multilateral bodies in global governance. 14. Barbados At the outset, we wish to thank you, Director -General, for your constructive report and to applaud you on the excellent work that you are doing with Members to ensure that MC12 is a success, and also in promoting the continued relevance of the WTO. Barbado s looks forward to join ing other Members on 15 July, ensuring our commitment to conclude a multilateral agreement on fisheries subsidies by the end of the year. We think that this would send a powerful message to the global community regarding the WTO and the state of our fisheries stocks as well as to concretise the relevant ability of the WTO to get the job done. I must say that it is unacceptable for Members to allow the status quo to continue for us to allow it to be institutionalised in the Agreement w ithin the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 182 - WTO under the guise of sustainability. The focus of any prohibition in a WTO Fisheries Subsidies Agreement in the area of overcapacity and overfishing , must be on subsidies to large -scale industrial fishing , which statistics show can contribute m ost to the types of fishing outlined in our mandate. We must also seek to ensure that those that are not responsible for the problem of overcapacity and overfishing do not pay the price for others that do; I really wish to reiterate that point. We therefor e believe that, with some amendments to the draft text, we could arrive at a landing zone that could allow us to reach consensus before the Ministerial. Such amendments would include, inter alia, the reflection of a de minimis threshold in line with what h as been promoted by the CARICOM and the ACP groups for some time, as well as critical adjustment to transparency, notifications and due process elements. We thank you for the initiative in developing the concept note for the establishment of a WTO fundin g mechanism to finance technical assistance and capacity building , in support of implementation of new WTO fisheries subsidies disciplines. We wish to stress that we fully agree that the proposed fisheries subsidies funding mechanism and broader concept of technical assistance and capacity building can in no way be seen as a substitute for Special and Differential Treatment for developing countries. Barbados' position is clear and continues to be that TACB under any fisheries subsidies agreement must be inc luded, and that the proposed fisheries WTO funding mechanisms must be accessible to all small and developing states (SVEs). On services, Barbados welcomes the opportunity to work with others in finding possible language on services market access for the M inisterial. Such language should be reflected ensuring that any future work in the area include the vulnerable sectors for countries like Barbados and others which were severely impacted by the pandemic , as well as those which have proven to be opportuniti es for us to ensure recovery and sustainable growth. Our position, for the most part, ha s been outlined in the ACP submission to the Council for Trade in Services in Special Session in March. We are cognisant of the limited time that we have left between now and the Ministerial and the myriad of issues that we would need to cover in the WTO, and the wider international context . Despite this, Barbados stands ready to work with the Director -General and all Members to ensure that MC12 is a resounding success and that we set an ambitious work programme for the post -MC12 period. 15. Argentina I would like to touch on four matters: fisheries subsidies negotiations, the WTO's response to the pandemic, agriculture, and dispute settlement. With regard to fisheries s ubsidies negotiations , Argentina reaffirms its commitment to continuing to do its utmost to ensure that, before the WTO's Twelfth Ministerial Conference (MC12), we can conclude a multilateral Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies. Argentina, as a coastal country with an extensive maritime coastline, has participated actively and will continue to do so in the negotiations. It has done so through specific proposals, in order to identify elements of convergence among the membership , to enable it to reach an ambitious agreement that contributes to the sustainability of the oceans and their resources. We shall not repeat what we stated a few days ago , our position is well known. We believe it is essential to have ambitious disci plines, particularly in relation to illegal fishing and fishing by large distant water fleets. In addition, there are certain safeguards that we deem essential (regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) and territoriality). We believe that we h ave reached a point at which we must now move to a text -based approach , to negotiations between Member s, in an inclusive and transparent way. Regarding the concept note on a WTO Funding Mechanism that was circulated , we see technical assistance as positive . However, we note a great deal of detail in certain points, such as point 4.2 and point 6.B. We understand that we need to work within the remit of the WTO, and we note that the document contains a number of references, including to fisheries management a nd surveillance or monitoring of waters, which could go beyond the mandate. We will follow the discussions, but would seek a clarification of the scope of such initiatives. With regard to the WTO's response to the pandemic , we would like to take this oppo rtunity to thank Ambassador Walker for the report he presented yesterday and to convey Argentina's full support for his work. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 183 - It is crucial for Argentina that the WTO's response to the pandemic is one of the outcomes of the upcoming MC12. The process to reach such an outcome must be guided by the principles of transparency, openness and inclusiveness, and must promote consensual solutions while respecting and promoting the rules - based multilateral trading system. Several proposals linking trade policy an d health have been put forward over the past months by groups of countries and by individual delegations. All of them are valuable and there is much overlap between them, as we all understand that international trade and the WTO have a central role to play in the production, distribution and access to the vaccines, treatments and diagnostics needed to combat COVID -19. It is therefore necessary and logical to channel these individual efforts towards a collective outcome. Nonetheless, we recognize that these initiatives only appealed to a fraction of the membership and we understand that they contain elements that we are not all in a position to accept. Argentina considers that all the proposed solutions need to be analyse d in light of an imbalance in access to vaccines and treatments. We must therefore be able to reach achievable and realistic agreements that will bring us closer to the ambitious goal of ensuring equitable access to vaccines and treatments to end the pande mic. For Argentina, any outcome that is reached must be consistent with WTO rules, without altering acquired rights or prejudicing future agreements or negotiations, while reaffirming the existing trade policy tools to address the pandemic. Valuable aspec ts of this matter have been discussed in the G20 and could serve as a reference point. The various circumstances, efforts and challenges faced by developing countries must also be taken into account. Finally, we consider that the calls, suggestions and/or recommendations that emerge must not be addressed solely to states. The private sector has a central role to play in all aspects related to the production and distribution of goods and inputs, including access to health technologies. On agriculture , for Argentina the agricultural negotiations are not only important because they relate to the most distorted international market sector and the slowest to demonstrate substantial progress, but also because for developing countries, producers and exporters of agricultural goods, agriculture is a fundamental means of rebuilding our economies in the post -pandemic period. Moving forward with a domestic support reduction programme involving all aspects of Article 6 of the Agreement on Agriculture and all Members, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, is a priority for Argentina. We consider that the framework for negotiations presented in January 2020 in document JOB/AG/177 provides a sound basis for entering into the se negotiations. My country note s that as much as the pandemic imposed exceptional circumstances on all Members, we are concerned about the establishment and implementation of new, large scale domestic support programmes, which we hope will be temporary and consistent with multilateral r ules. Furthermore, we consider it essential to make progress on market access, an area in which we have also been constructive, through the proposal contained in JOB/AG/198. We could work on tariff simplification, strengthening transparency and removing t he special agricultural safeguard. We could also consider moving forward with a work programme under this pillar for MC13. On export competition, we could work to strengthen transparency by monitoring all forms of export subsidies and all measures with eq uivalent effect, ensuring that the historic elimination of export subsidies agreed in 2015 is not undermined. We are open to listen and negotiate in good faith with all Members on concrete proposals under each of the pillars with the aim of advancing an a mbitious, realistic and balanced negotiating package for the next Ministerial Conference. However, notwithstanding our preferences, given the time constraints and divergent positions, we believe that energy should be directed towards reaching an outcome o n domestic support, as it was WT/GC/M/19 2 - 184 - identified by the chair of the Committee on Agriculture in Special Session (CoA SS) as the area most likely to achieve an outcome at the next MC12. Finally, regarding the dispute settlement system , Argentina, as a developing country and a frequent user thereof, believes that a rule -based system is the best alternative to facilitate economic growth, confidence building, predictability and stability in our trade relations . Such a system exists and is the fruit of our decades lon g multilateral experience. We are aware of the systemic concerns of some Members, but we also believe that there needs to be sufficient flexibility on this matter to be able to build a collective way forward. Argentina again reiterates its openness to di scuss proposals to strengthen the agreed system to invigorate the Appellate Body, as part of the outcomes of the upcoming MC12. 16. Iceland (Informal Working Group on Trade and Gender) Trade and Gender As co-chair of the Informal Working Group on Trade and Gender I would like to report on the ongoing work. The Informal Working Group is based on the objectives of the 2017 Buenos Aires Declaration on Trade and Women’s Economic Empowerment and of the Interi m Report establishing the Group (WT/L/1095/Rev.1). The Group has been designed as an open and transparent body and does not intend to create a new set of agreements or rules. Members agreed to focus their work on 4 key pillars: 1) experience sharing; 2) how to apply "gender lens" to the WTO; 3) review of analytical work done by the WTO Secretariat and other WTO stakeholders; 4) and contribute to the Aid -for-Trade Work Programme. This substantial technical work will form the content of an MC12 outcome. On 30 April, the Co -Chairs proposed a framework supporting the concrete actions and the substantial focus that would be included in the MC12 outcome of the Informal Working Group (INF/TGE/W/3). The Co -Chairs also met with the D irector -General on 1 June and the discussion showed alignment between the Co-Chairs' and the Director -General's ambitions for MC12 on trade and gender. Following the 23 June meeting, some Members and Observers, which we call the "Friends of Gender ", started working on a first draft. This work of the Friends remains open to all Members wishing to participate. So far, the MC12 outcome on trade and gender would include a Joint Ministerial Statement, a recap of what has been accomplished since 2017 and a Roadmap. The ne xt regular meetings of the group are scheduled to take place on 23 September, 18 October and 24 November. They will continue to serve as platform for Members and Observers to exchange technical work and experience on trade and gender. Priority will however be given to MC12 discussions given the tight schedule towards the Ministerial meeting. Lastly, during the Public Forum, the Co -Chairs will organi ze a session titled "Women in international trade: the fastest economic recovery ". This session will bring t ogether a spectrum of businesswomen to discuss the gender specific challenges that they are facing when dealing with international trade. The results of the discussion will then be compiled into recommendations that will be presented to the Informal Workin g Group on Trade and Gender. 17. Iceland And now putting on my Icelandic hat I would like to say a few words on Fisheries subsidies. Iceland would like to congratulate the Director General as well as Ambassador Wills for the successful Ministerial meeting on July 15. The Ministerial meeting was an important milestone and met our expectations in many respects. The level of participation clearly showed how important the negotiations are and how critical it is that the WTO deliver s an agreement ahead of MC12. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 185 - As a fisheries nation , Iceland has for decades put responsible fishing practices and sustainable fisheries at the core of national policy. Concluding an effective agreement which successfully puts an end to harmful subsidies practices in fisheries , is like wise a matter of national priority. Chair, the Ministerial meeting has given the WTO renewed momentum to conclude an effective agreement that will successfully put an end to harmful subsidies in fisheries. Iceland recogni zes that special and differential treatment will be a key component of our agreement, providing needs -based and temporary flexibilities for artisanal fisheries in poor and vulnerable communities in developing and LDC Member countries. In the last decades, a conside rable part of the Icelandic development cooperation has been in the field of sustainable fisheries. We want all fisheries to be responsible and sustainable, despite the capacity restraints that some Members have raised during these negotiations. Accordingl y, Iceland welcomes the proposal for the creation of a "Fisheries WTO Funding Mechanism" to support the targeted implementation of new fisheries subsidies disciplines by developing and least developed countries (LDCs), in cooperation with other internation al institutions. 18. European Union MC12 is four months away and we still have a great amount of work to do, with Members quite divided on many of the key files. The E uropean Union is committed to reaching MC12 outcomes that would set us on a path towards the kind of deep reform of the rules -based trading system that is needed if the WTO is to survive as a relevant body. But, clearly, this can only be achieved if all WTO Members are committed. As of September, we need to be ready to be in full negotiating mode and have a clear, intensive process of engagement in place in Geneva, which will allow Members to coalesce and focus on achieving compromises on the key elements of an MC12 p ackage that would be both reasonable and meaningful. The European Union' s priorities for MC12 are four -fold: concluding the fisheries subsidies negotiations, achieving an outcome on trade and health, finding some progress on agriculture and improving the overall functioning of the WTO. Firstly, on fisheries subsidies, the 15 July Ministerial meeting usefully reconfirmed our shared objectives to reach a meaningful agreement. Unfortunately, big gaps remain on some key issues. This should be a wake -up call to the membership. Reaching a deal will require intense work to find a balance on the core provisions based on sustainability and using fisheries management measures as well as targeted special and differential treatment. We thank Ambassador Wills for his work programme , but would want to stress that when designing the autumn negotiating programme , we have to recognize that small group discussions are the only way real progress can be made, while of course ensuring transparency to keep the whole membership engaged. This is true for any line- by-line discussions too. Despite the challenges, we are optimistic that we can make this happen by MC12. I would also note that the E uropean Union is supportive of a funding mechanism to provide technical assistance that is focused specifically on helping developing countries to implement commitments they have taken. Second, on trade and health, the E uropean Union and co -sponsors of the revised draft Declaration on Trade and Health have provided a contribution to the pro cess on the multilateral response to the COVID -19 crisis. We believe that the prospective MC12 declaration can build on that. Various Members have recently made proposals on how WTO Members can build crisis resilience from a trade perspective. The recent U S proposal on trade facilitation is also an element of the puzzle. We hope that Ambassador Walker will find a point of convergence of all these proposals and propose a way forward on that basis. Third, on agriculture we are worried about the prevailing ga ps and hardening of positions as demonstrated in the last CoA -SS meeting. At this stage, we see any outcome extremely challenging to achieve. Putting aside a few totally unrealistic proposals notably tabled this week, there are several issues which could b e ripe for a decision at MC12 and could be part of a credible agricultural WT/GC/M/19 2 - 186 - package. The E uropean Union sees a possibility of immediate deliverables on transparency on which the European Union will submit today to the CoA -SS a co -sponsored proposal; in addi tion on export restrictions including on the World Food Programme decision, and on the Bali TRQ decision review. These are areas that can be ripe for an outcome at MC12 if Members are committed to deliver on these. They could be part of a broader agricultu re package for MC12. As regards domestic support, we support a work programme for pursuing work post -MC12 on trade distorting domestic support that sets the direction of travel, as well as on the issue of public stockholding. MC12 should also launch a se rious process of discussion on how to improve the functioning of the negotiating, monitoring and deliberating functions of the WTO. The WTO needs to be able to update its rules in a more flexible manner and provide a service to its Members through better m onitoring of trade policies. In order to deliberate on these matters and set a path towards reform by MC13, we should set up a Working Group that looks into institutional improvements of the functioning of the WTO. Linked to this, MC12 must include an ou tcome on dispute settlement. For this, we need to find convergence by MC12 on a time -limited work programme for agreeing on a package of reforms of the WTO dispute settlement system necessary to restore a fully functioning dispute settlement system. The ob jective should be to achieve this goal, including a reformed Appellate Body, within a defined time period and in any event no later than by MC13. This is absolutely imperative for the credibility of the WTO. Finally, the European Union attaches great imp ortance in making a significant progress in the Joint Statement Initiatives ahead of MC12. We in particular look forward to concluding the well-advanced domestic regulation negotiations. The U nited States joining these negotiations earlier this week will certainly facilitate reaching our objective. The European Union strongly encourages other Members who have been considering joining this JSI, to take a prompt decision. 19. Indonesia During the last TNC meeting in May, we send our condolences to India for the spike of COVID -19 infection that has taken many lives. Today, my country and many other countries are experiencing the same devastation. I need to say it again: this pandemic is f ar from over. But in countries with a significant roll -out of vaccines, the rise of infection no longer parallels the mortality rate. For others facing inequality of access to vaccines, we are defenceless against this crisis. Nothing is more important for the world at the moment than addressing this crisis. We must take bold action to address this pandemic. Addressing export restriction s, tariff s, or non -tariff barriers alone will not be sufficient to address this pandemic. We need open cooperation, not de pending on market mechanism to protect the interest of few companies. Knowledge and know -how are global public goods that need to be shared to increase the production of vaccines and essential medical products to counter this crisis. The WTO needs to fina lize the temporary TRIPS waiver without much delay. The TRIPS may not be the ultimate solution. But it leads to a real change in ramping up diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines across the globe. Global economic recovery squarely depends on the ability t o overcome the pandemic. Clearly, a solution -oriented conversation is urgently needed on securing timely, affordable, and equitable access to vaccines and therapeutics. We must, therefore, find a balanced outcome on the TRIPS waiver. The next important ag enda in our table is to finalize the mandated issues at MC12. Indonesia continues to reiterate that we need to deliver critical mandated issues in agriculture in this Ministerial Conference. Therefore, a permanent solution for PSH, and operable SSM are h ighly important to take part as outcomes in MC12. Indonesia and G33 co -sponsoring Members are drafting a realistic and reliable permanent solution for PSH as a basis of discussion towards MC12, of which the proposal is underway. Indonesia requests all Memb ers to sincerely consider the proposal and look at the document that will be circulated shortly. The outcomes on PSH and SSM are being delayed for almost 10 years. If the priority of resolving mandated issues that have been long overdue is still not taken seriously in good faith , to find a solution in the form of a landing zone proposal, we need to reconsider support for the achievement of other agricultural pillars, including the fisheries WT/GC/M/19 2 - 187 - subsidies. Therefore, we urge other Members to work towards a const ructive outcome on the permanent solution. On fisheries, we note that much work needs to be done to resolve imbalances and other technical issues to move forward with the negotiation. Respecting the principle of common but differentiated responsibility in this discipline is a key ingredient to achieve a balanced discipline On e-commerce , emanating from the 1998 Work Program me, Indonesia strongly believes that the outcome on the e -commerce moratorium at MC12 will depend on our ability to clarify the scope and definition of electronic transmission. More so, at a time when governments are facing the worst fiscal and economic crisis due to the pandemic, a clear assessment can help governments on deciding the continuation of the moratorium. On special and differential treatment , we support the G90 agreement -specific proposals. Indonesia strongly believes that special and differential treatment is a treaty -embedded right, and the Doha mandate emphasizes making special and differential treatment provisions precise, effective, and operational. Madam Chair, our next priority is to restore the Appellate Body, which is at the core of the two -stage dispute settlement system. Without a functional Appellate Body, there is little purpose in negotiating new trade agreements. Indonesia would once again call on Members to renew political will to resolve this issue. 20. Brazil Brazil is strongly committed to the multilateral trading system and supports a reform to modernize and revitalize the WTO. We need to s tart by achieving concrete and meaningful results at MC12. Fisheries Subsidies One of these deliverables is the conclusion of the fisheries subsidies ' negotiations. The Chair 's text offers a good basis for the core disciplines of the future agreement. Brazil continues, however, to consider that basic prohibitions combined with exceptions based on management measures might not be enough to decrease the pressure on maritime fish stocks. It is important that the Chair 's text contemplate, in some way, complementary approaches, such as "cutting and capping " mechanisms. That would send a strong message to the world that WTO Members are committed to ambitious sustainability goals. Agriculture Another issue closely linked to sustainability objectiv es is agricultural domestic support. The current pandemic has shown how excessively loose agricultural rules and limits allow for sudden increases in global trade -distorting domestic support, especially for those Members that already concentrate most of th e expenditures in agricultural subsidies. Reforms have stalled in the past ten years. Worse, some countries have rolled back earlier reform efforts. MC12 must deliver a framework for capping and proportionally reducing trade -distorting domestic support alo ng with a working program clearly defined for MC13. Brazil maintains that transparency is not enough as an outcome on domestic support for MC12, nor as a sound basis for post -MC12 work. We also strongly support the Ministerial Declaration on SPS, which is a way forward in helping farmers worldwide to thrive. Dispute Settlement System Another priority for Brazil is the Dispute Settlement System. The WTO Membership should, at a minimum, agree at MC12 on launching negotiations to re-establish a fully operati onal Appellate Body no later than MC13. This could be done, for instance, in a MC12 Ministerial Understanding on the role and procedures of the Appellate Body. Any multilateral solution should encompass the unblocking of appointments of new Members of the Appellate Body, as well as the preservation of two levels of “adjudication” and the negative consensus. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 188 - MC12 Package In Brazil's perspective, the MC12 package should also contain: • a Ministerial Declaration on trade and health; • an agreement on a pathway that leads to the flexible geometry of plurilateral negotiations at the WTO; • deliverables on subsidies across all sectors; • the conclusion of negotiations on investment facilitation and domestic regulation, a multilateral outcome on MSMEs, a stock -taking declaration on e -commerce and its way forward; and • an agreement on enhanced transparency and notifications. MC12 can be a turning point for the WTO. I am confident that we can find pragmatic solutions to achieve concrete results. 21. Republic of Korea Importance of a successful MC12 We have waited 4 years for this biennial Ministerial meeting to be materialized. It would be a big mistake if we fail to grasp this opportunity for meaningful outcomes for MC12, not least because the credibility and future of the WTO is at stake. As you said, Chair, it is high time we concentrate our efforts to identify items which are achievable by MC12 and others that need more time to reflect on. From my delegation 's perspective, I would like to highlight some of the ar eas of negotiations where we should work together to obtain successful outcomes for MC12. Negotiations on Fisheries Subsidies First, on Fisheries Subsidies, Korea appreciates the efforts you and Amb assador Wills made for a successful Ministerial meeting that took place on July 15th. As you said, Chair, we were able to witness the entire membership 's collective willingness to engage in the negotiations to reach a long-awaited conclusion of the negotiations, hopefully in advance of MC12. I welcome Amb assador Wills' plan to proceed with the process of text -based negotiations based on the draft text in front of us from early September. I would like to assure you and Amb assador Wills that while Korea has a few a reas of concern, it will engage in upcoming intensive negotiations in a constructive and responsible manner so that a balanced text could be produced at the end of the day. Agriculture With regard to agriculture, my delegation appreciates Members' collec tive efforts through CoA -SS to build bridges in the run -up to MC12. The 3 -day long intensive CoA -SS meetings this week showed that wide gaps still remain on some core issues, such as domestic support, export competition, and PSH. In spite of a bumpy -lookin g road ahead to MC12 in agriculture, Korea welcomes the C hair's efforts to introduce the first draft text by the end of July and to have a last CoA -SS meeting before the summer break. On Ministerial agricultural outcomes, Korea would like to reiterate the importance of transparency all across the pillars, and in particular, in the domain of export restrictions. Enhanced transparency in export restrictions will contribute to food security in global markets, which is of critical importance for developing cou ntries and net -food importing countries. Exempting WFP food procurement from export restrictions should also be a part of MC12 deliverables. JSIs It is encouraging that in many different areas of JSI negotiations progress is being made. JSIs are critical for updating the WTO 's rulebook and making the WTO more relevant to the priorities of today. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 189 - I would like to reiterate the standing invitation for the broadest possible engagement of Members in the ongoing JSI negotiations. Korea is pleased that the Unit ed States announced its intention to formally join the Services Domestic Regulation Joint Initiative. My delegation also welcomes Peru's decision to be part of the Joint Initiative on Investment Facilitation. On substance, we believe that the formal parti cipation by the United States in the Services Domestic Regulation Joint Initiative will help generate the momentum needed for us to bridge the gaps in a few remaining outstanding issues. Korea strongly supports the goal of concluding D omestic Regulation negotiations by MC -12. Significant progress has been achieved on Investment Facilitation. I look forward to working toward the cleanest possible text before MC -12. On e-commerce, I am encouraged by the fact that this week we have now two more clean texts, namely on e -contracts and transparency, and look forward to having some further progress before the summer break. Korea stands ready to contribute to helping produce as many clean texts as possible by MC12. Trade and Environment Tackling climate c hange and achieving carbon neutrality is an urgent task today. My delegation believes that the WTO should play an important role in environmental sustainability. Liberalizing trade in environmental goods and services and ensuring transparency and predictab ility of trade -related environmental measures are one of the most effective ways to facilitate our transition to low -carbon economy. WTO Members are encouraged to strengthen discussions on trade and environment for potential MC12 deliverables. To this end, a joint proposal by Australia, Singapore and Korea is on the table for consideration. DSB Last but not the least, the dispute settlement system. Restoring the two -tier dispute settlement system of the WTO should be a main priority for the entire members hip as part of our collective efforts to make the WTO a better functioning organ. By MC12, I believe, we should come up with a concrete work plan to deal with this matter. My delegation remains flexible as regards the way through which this vital issue can be addressed, as long as constructive discussions among Members with specific timeline s are ensured. 22. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Arab Group) The Arab Group would like to thank you Madam Director -General for your report including your assessment and suggest ions to Members on the way forward. We also would like to appreciate the valuable efforts of you Madam Director -General and the Chair of the Negotiating Group on Rules to make the Ministerial meeting of 15th July a successful one. Let me also extend our th anks to the Chairs of Negotiating Bodies for their reports and assessments. In the coming few months and after the summer break, we need more than ever to intensify our efforts and to engage in a solution -oriented mode with the sense of urgency and necess ary flexibility to achieve a consensus that lead s to positive outcomes for MC12. Looking ahead towards MC12, allow me to highlight the Arab Group views on some certain areas that we see as priorities for MC12: The first one is COVID -19 pandemic and the vaccines. The Arab Group believes that the WTO can play an important role in ensuring the global supply chain of critical medical products and in making vaccines available for all Members in need. We emphasize the importance of equitable worldwide access t o COVID -19 vaccines for economic growth and trade to bounce back from the pandemic, especially in developing and least developed countries. We urge countries to come together and avoid the temptation of "vaccine nationalism ", because the health of people a nd the economy will not be safe until everyone, everywhere has access to the tools necessary to end this pandemic. We WT/GC/M/19 2 - 190 - commend all recent calls and initiatives reached between international organizations including WTO to enhance their support to Members bat tling COVID -19. The second area is fisheries subsidies . We were encouraged by the constructive engagement among Ministers and Heads of Delegations during the Ministerial meeting on fisheries subsidies last week. We observed a clear boost of momentum towar ds concluding the negotiations on fisheries subsidies with the aim to have a meaningful and balance d outcome for each Member. We believe that the meeting provided us with the necessary political guidance on how to move forward with this important issue. We believe that the instructions provided by our Ministers during that meeting should be taken as the basis of our future work to narrow the gap of differences and to find common ground and landing zones, in order to generate consensus before MC12. We also think that allowing more policy space for developing Members to develop their domestic fisheries in these negotiations will lead to a successful conclusion. The third are a is agriculture . We welcome the Chair 's recent report in which she outlined the contours of a possible deal on agricultural trade in the run -up to the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12). We think it repre sented an accurate assessment of the situation. We also emphasize the urgency of achieving progress at MC12, and encourage all Members to engage constructively in the technical discussions in order to achieve a successful outcome on this crucial issue. The fourth area is the WTO reform. We believe that an active engagement, a strong political will and a full understanding of the scope and elements of proposed reform are required to advance WTO reform. We also underscore the importance of a well -functionin g Dispute Settlement Body. We therefore encourage all Members to double their efforts to find ways to restore and improve the functioning of the WTO dispute settlement system. In the area of accession to the WTO: Accession to the WTO can present a window of opportunity to acceding countries to integrate beneficially into the global economy. The Arab Region is one of the areas of the world with the largest number of countries outside the multilateral trading system. Of the 22 Members of the Arab League, 13 countries are WTO Members and eight countries are in the process of accession. We hope that MC12 should be an opportunity to deliver in this area to ensure more universality of the orga nization, particularly for those who still in the process of accession. We also underline that the accession of LDCs should be conducted under a "fast track " approach 23. Saudi Arabia Before I conclude, I would like to make a statement on behalf of the Kingd om of Saudi Arabia on WTO reform. In this regard, I would like to refer to the Riyadh Initiative on the future of the WTO, which was launched by the Saudi Arabian G20 Presidency and annexed to the G20 Trade and Investment Ministers Communiqué that was circ ulated as a WTO document (WT/GC/221), and gained the recognition of the G20 Leaders at the Riyadh Summit as indicated in their declaration that was circulated as a WTO document (WT/L/1101). In light of this, we believe that the Riyadh Initiative could form a good basis for further discussion among the entire membership towards the necessary reform of the WTO and we request to add it to the list of initiatives on the WTO reform discussions and consultations. In conclusion, the Arab Group stands ready to wo rk constructively with WTO Members towards successful outcomes at MC12. 24. Norway Norway has for quite some time identified the WTO response to the pandemic, fisheries subsidies and WTO reform as the key areas for delivery at MC12. Today, I will however li mit my comments to the negotiations on fisheries subsidies, as this is the most important and urgent issue before us on the agenda of the Trade Negotiations Committee. Results are long overdue. The world's oceans , as well as fishermen and women everywher e, need a meaningful agreement that answers the call for more sustainable fisheries. It is about much more than saving fish. It is about securing a healthy marine environment for the sake of people of this generation, and for generations coming after us. We need to conclude the negotiations this year. Kicking the can down the road as we have done so many times in the past is not an option. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 191 - We heard and acknowledge the various views voiced at last week 's Ministerial. We noted that many Ministers said that no outcome would be the worst of all results, because the current unsustainable practices will continue to deplete our common resources. We must not let the perfect become the enemy of the good. We also heard that a result that seems to cement the status quo is not an acceptable outcome. We agree. We do however believe that the Chair's draft text contains elements of a realistic landing zone that can be built upon so that the end result will be significant changes in current practices. Let us therefore eng age directly with each other in text -based negotiations so that we can conclude a deal that will make a difference. To get to a deal will require all sides to compromise. Permit me in that context to make a couple of comments specifically on overcapacity and overfishing. To us the most important thing is to immediately discipline the largest fisheries nations, the top 25 or so, and Norway being among them. We heard the call for a de minimis. Norway is ready to discuss how we can accommodate the requests from the smallest fisheries nations for more lenient disciplines for them, including on transparency and on invocation of the flexibilities. We have also noted the concerns regarding the core discipline in 5.1.1. Norway is ready to look at whether the t ext should include greater commitments by some Members, especially the largest fisheries nations which also includes the biggest subsidizers, to ensure that subsidies do no harm, while at the same time accommodating other Members with the necessary flexibi lities to be able to make use of 5.1.1. Norway agrees with the Chair 's proposal for a two -staged, intensive negotiation in September and October. We will continue to engage constructively in our common search for a meaningful deal that can be concluded a nd accepted by all members as soon as possible. Finally, Chair, allow me to suggest that we consider reinstating the informal time limit for interventions in the TNC as a means of streamlining our proceedings. 25. Panama (Article XII Members) I am making this short statement on behalf of the Group of Article XII Members. The Group would like to reiterate our previous calls for the need of levelling the playing field in the ongoing negotiations, not just in agriculture. We look forward to receiving t he first draft text for a possible outcome on agriculture next week and hope that our Group 's messages will have been considered and integrated. Chair, our Group has been actively engaging with the informal Sub -Group on the WTO response to the pandemic as well as the General Council Facilitator -led process. Many Members have applied trade restrictive measures on essential health -related goods and services, that were nevertheless consistent with their WTO commitments. We believe our Group 's agenda of levell ing the playing field in access and other commitments could have facilitated a more coordinated response to the COVID - 19 pandemic, by keeping open markets and supply chains for essential medical supplies and services. Higher levels of commitments by the or iginal Members, to the level required of our Group, can for the same reasons be an important ingredient in a multilateral trading system that can better respond to future pandemics. Lastly, Chair, we take note of the recently circulated document on the S tate-of-Play of Accessions and reiterate our support to the ongoing accessions. We hope to welcome new Members to the WTO by MC12. 26. Panama Panama would like to thank you, Ambassador Santiago Wills and the Secretariat for organizing the Ministerial Meeting on fisheries. We are pleased that following this meeting we will launch text -based negotiations in order to conclude an agreement with effective and ambitious disciplines. We support your intention and that of the Chair to organize meetings of various kin ds, respecting transparency and inclusiveness, and rapidly informing Members of any meeting that is not open -ended, and also of the results achieved. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 192 - One lesson we must learn from the fisheries Ministerial meeting is that negotiations for MC12 – in terms o f both topics of negotiation and declarations or decisions – must be concluded well before the Ministerial Conference. The hybrid format is not well suited to high level negotiations. We must also make arrangements for post MC12 work in order to revive the WTO's negotiating function. Here we must at least agree to establish work plans – with timelines, milestones, etc. – throughout the integrated agenda and multilateral negotiating groups, not only in agriculture. In agriculture, Members need to agree on c omprehensive reform across all pillars of agriculture. A thematic balance is required with respect to Members' concerns and priorities. Those who insist on looking at only a limited aspect condemn us to continued paralysis at the multilateral level. The s ervices negotiations, part of the integrated agenda, are also essential to move from impasse to outcomes. Perhaps we will have more incentive to give the attention that these negotiations require, in view of their importance for the recovery and sustainabi lity of trade in the post COVID era. Also in services, the negotiations call for a balance between the access and rules aspects. So, it is of the utmost importance that during the Ministerial Conference we Members establish the role of the WTO in relation to COVID -19 and its contribution to the economic recovery of Members. We also call for time to be devoted to discussions on other topics such as the extension of the moratorium on the cases of non -violation under the TRIPS Agreement, pending a substantiv e discussion of the topic. We must find the political will to resume substantive work on e -commerce, and to extend the moratorium on tariffs on electronic transmissions. 27. China Please allow me to join others to sincerely commend you, Ambassador Wills, as well as the dedicated Secretariat staff who have worked tirelessly to make the 15 July TNC Ministerial meeting happen. We thank the Chairs of the different negotiating groups for their reports. On fisheries subsidies, China supports Ambassador Wills' workplan for autumn. We believe that such a clear roadmap will help us prepare for the final stretch after the summer break. It will translate the strong, critical message we have h eard last week, into constructive engagement and the demonstration of flexibilities in the text -based discussions. After last week's successful meeting, hopefully we can all sense a positive signal and a new momentum for our negotiations. As stated by our Minister Wang Wentao, China will continue to participate in the negotiation and contribute to its swift conclusion. To this end, we should avoid introducing new elements into this final stage of discussions. As Fiji mentioned, we are closer than ever to su ccess in the history of this negotiation , but we still have many difficulties to overcome. Various concerns , including ours, need to be addressed in a very short period of time. Adding new elements which are not covered by our mandate and have not been tes ted in the last twenty years will only overload our already very heavy work and drive us away from a possible success. This is the last TNC meeting before the summer break. Many colleagues previously called upon having a reality check or a stock take of progress in order to clarify next steps after the summer. I hope that through today's engagement, Members could come to an understanding to make subtractions rather than additions. As we have only three working months left before MC12, we should pragmatica lly identify possible deliverables and devote our energy and resources after the summer break to have them materialised. Last minute surprises are not an option , be it with new agenda item s for the Ministerial, or additional elements in specific negotiatio ns, we should bear in mind that we should not overload the agenda. China, in a pragmatic and objective point of view, expects MC12 with outcomes on the following areas : 1. Restoring the Appellate Body, or at least having a workplan which explicitly outli nes the next steps and basic principles for restoring and improving the A ppellate Body. 2. Completing the fisheries subsidies negotiations. 3. Reaching critical commitments on pandemic -related issues, including the way forward and specific decisions on certain areas such as the TRIPS waiver. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 193 - 4. Achieving a PSH solution on agriculture. In this regard, we could add a statement made by Indonesia on behalf of the G33. 5. Making progress in existing JSI discussions, including investment facilitation, e -commerce, trade and health, trade and the environment , women empowerment, MSMEs. Lastly, China supports the start of a consultation process on a Ministerial outcome document immediately after the summer break under the G eneral -Council Chair's capable leade rship. The document should deliver a positive and encouraging signal to the international community , demonstrating solidarity instead of a split of the membership. 28. New Zealand On fish, we too take heart from the Ministerial meeting last week, and let m e express our thanks to you Director General for your leadership in this respect. It was a technically impressive meeting , and we commend those working behind the scenes who made it happen. Substantively , it was not what we hoped for. We, along with other APEC economies, hoped to be concluding in July. It is imperative that we now work intensively and line by line to ensure a quality outcome is concluded, in line with our mandate in SDG 14.6, as soon as possible ahead of MC12. Technical assistance and capac ity building as needed for implementation should be one part of an overall package of disciplines, with discussions on the mechanics rightly taking place in tandem. The negotiations on fish eries subsidies must be concluded ahead of MC12. We commend Chair Wills for his determination, and the indications he has given today for our work in September to conclude in October. Achieving an earlier outcome on fish delivers on the overdue SDG 14.6 deadline and will allow MC12 to focus on other pressing global mat ters. For New Zealand, as for all other delegations who have spoken today, COVID -19 and the WTO 's Response to the Pandemic is clearly one of those issues. As you said Chair, in my systemic Facilitator capacity , I provided an update on that multilateral process to General Council Members yesterday and will report formally at the General Council meeting next week. As current APEC host, New Zealand can report strong recognition from Ministers of Trade on 5 June and from Leaders in an unprecedented additional informal retreat held on 16 July on the importance of using trade as a tool to respond to the pandemic. Beyond the pandemic response, MC12 must deliver on agriculture. We look forward to CoA -SS Chair 's first draft text in that regard. We agree with Brazil that transparency will not be enough. We must at least agree on the negotiating parameters to guide us towards a meaningful outcome on domestic support. As Ambassador Mina reported from Cairns Group Minist ers, the Framework for negotiations on domestic support is a realistic and achievable starting point. MC12 needs to set clear parameters and timeframes for domestic support negotiations that build on the principles of the framework and which reflect the vi ews of the WTO membership. You have asked us, Chair, to discuss the way forward. There is work we must do before MC12, work for MC12 itself and work beyond MC12. The way forward will involve discussions in a range of formats. There are issues that we mu st continue to work on collectively after MC12. Here, New Zealand has not lost sight of the need for WTO Reform, and the urgent need for restoration of a fully functioning binding dispute settlement system. The Joint Statement Initiatives, grounded with a clear goal of multilateralism and based on principles of inclusion and transparency, are also an important feature of our way forward. 29. Mauritius (African Group) The African Group remains committed to constructive discussions and a meaningful outcome at MC12. On specific issues, Chair, I start with fisheries subsidies and commend you for the successful holding of the Ministerial Conference on 15 July 2021. We heard some 104 Ministers and that in itself is comfort about the continued engagement of Member s in the WTO. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 194 - The message from African Ministers is clear. The text on the table will serve as a useful basis for discussions after it has been balanced. This balance will best be measured by the responsiveness of the text to the mandate which ha s been given to us for the negotiations. The African Ministers also clearly articulated that special and differential treatment is not only about artisanal and small -scale fisheries but about policy space to develop their fisheries sector. They also highlighted the need for any outcome to deliver on sustainability and to disallow any flexibilities that will oppose the achievement of sustainability. Indeed, the mandate is about eliminating harmful subsidies in the direction of achieving sustainability. The African Group looks forward to resuming negotiations with other Members in September to re-balance the Fisheries text consistent with all aspects of the mandate. Agriculture Turning to agriculture, I note that FAO data shows that already 174 million pe ople across 58 countries, mostly from Africa, are grappling with serious food consumption gaps or above -usual acute malnutrition. Food security remains of high importance to the African Group and we are glad you specifically mentioned this in your stateme nt, Director -General. We unfortunately note that there has been little to no progress made on special safeguard measures and public stockholding. A critical, but yet long standing mandated issue that also remains unresolved is the curbing of trade distorti ng domestic support measures to ensure a level playing field towards fair and equitable trade. This has a direct implication on the development of lesser developed countries that not only rely on agriculture for their livelihood , but also lack the means to subsidise their farmers to compete in markets. With a view to concretely advancing the discussions towards a meaningful outcome for MC12, the African Group has tabled proposals on (i) domestic support; (ii) public food stockholding; (iii) special safegua rd mechanism; and (iv) COVID -19 and the food security crisis. We trust that Members will earnestly engage on the ideas proposed by the African Group in these proposals, and we stand ready to interact in meaningful discussions. TRIPS Waiver There is no doubt that recovery from the pandemic will be long and tedious. In fact, we are not even out of the pandemic, let alone the first phase of recovery. Due to the inequitable distribution of vaccines, the African continent is struggling to manage the health c risis. The percentage of vaccination in Africa stands at a mere 2% in comparison to the global average of around 40% which is twenty -fold more than Africa. There will be little economic recovery if the problem of vaccine accessibility is not addressed. We therefore reiterate our support for the proposed TRIPS waiver to allow the ramping up of vaccine production, especially in developing areas of the world. In this regard, while we are glad that text-based negotiations have begun, we realise that there is still resistance from a few. We would like to highlight that the TRIPS waiver proposal is a necessary and crucial component to a WTO response to the pandemic and that this is critical to boost and diversify production. We therefore look forward to the addit ional collaborative work that is required from us, such as providing access to raw materials in the manufacturing of vaccines and the transfer of know -how and technology that will be required to achieve the desired outcome. LDCs waiver On a more positive note, we welcome the decision of the TRIPS Council (in document IP/C/88) to extend the transition period under TRIPS Article 66.1 for LDCs until 1 July 2034. We commend the TRIPS Council Chair for his stewardship in reaching this encouraging outco me. We also rejoice that the TRIPS Council could eventually recognize the special economic, financial and administrative constraints that LDCs continue to face, and their need for flexibility to create a viable technological base, particularly exacerbated by the long -term social and economic impacts of the COVID -19 pandemic. Finally, on this point, we would like to recall that the LDC Group's request contained a post-graduation element on which the understanding between Members is that the post -graduation element of the LDCs request would be best pursued under the other LDC proposal being considered by the General Council. We call upon Members to engage in that discussion constructively, in good WT/GC/M/19 2 - 195 - faith and to reciprocate the flexibility the LDC Group demonstr ated to build the necessary consensus for adopting the extension decision. Special and Differential Treatment I now turn to the discussions on special and differential treatment. Special and differential treatment remains crucial to dealing with existin g structural imbalances and for providing a level playing field to developing Members and LDCs. We thank the Chair of the CTD SS for all her efforts to advanc e discussions and seek the support of Members for the G90 proposals on special and differential t reatment . E-commerce Work Programme Lastly Chair, let me touch upon the concerns of the African Group with regards to the digital divide , which became even more apparent during the pandemic. E-commerce, tele -working, tele -schooling and home delivery serv ices present a huge challenge across the continent. We firmly believe that the WTO can play a leading role in harnessing institutional coherence and helping bridge the gaps so that we may substantially address the digital divide. With the needs of modern s ociety being increasingly incumbent on digital technologies, we request that the 1998 Work Programme on E - commerce be accelerated and reviewed , taking into account th e developmental benefits that flow from such advances and the benefit to the global e -comm erce community. Before I end, Chair, let me thank the Ambassador of Iceland for his report on Trade and Gender and recall that we had proposed that the Committee look at how unpatented technology can be accessed and be made available through programs such as She Trades of the ITC to empower women entrepreneurs to improve their efficiency and the quality of the products. I do believe that working on this issue with the Working Group on Transfer of Technology could lead to a real outcome in favour of women e ntrepreneurs. In conclusion Chair, COVID -19 has affected African countries in significant ways, we firmly believe that development should remain at the centre of the work of this institution and we need to ensure that the WTO contributes to the economic r ecovery efforts of our Members. This is crucial to the continued relevance of the WTO to developing countries. 30. Honduras Honduras thanks you for your report and the report submitted by the Chairs of the various negotiating groups. As you have mentioned ea rlier, time is not on our side. After the summer break, we will have only three months to complete the necessary work for the Ministerial Conference, which should not prevent us from achieving meaningful results, but it is imperative to be pragmatic and focus on a realistic and viable number of outcomes. For Honduras, the WTO response to the pandemic is a priority, and we agree with a number of Members that the subject of trade and health must be integral and central to MC12. The challenges associated with the pandemic are many and highly complex, starting with the most urgent: the equitable distribution of vaccines. We strongly believe that trade is a necessary conduit for the socio -economic recovery of our countries, not only to help us br ing this pandemic to an end but also to be well prepared for the future. In this regard, we welcome the efforts made by the Chair of the General Council and his facilitator, Ambassador David Walker, as well as the document circulated by Ambassador Spencer and Ambassador Tan yesterday. Honduras stands ready and is committed to work towards an effective and equitable solution to this issue. In the fisheries subsidies negotiations, we consider it a priority to achieve convergence on the outstanding issues, we must therefore pursue the technical discussions. We also believe that we must all make efforts and show willingness and flexibility to recognize the importance of an effective and adequate special and differential treatment (SDT), without undermining the objective of improving the sustainability of the oceans. Furthermore, there is a need to recognize the importance of the topic in terms of food security, employment, poverty reduction and livelihoods for poor artisanal fisheries in our countries and to ena ble us to develop our fisheries sector. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 196 - On agriculture, we believe that we should continue our efforts to narrow the gaps in the negotiating positions and achieve a balanced and credible outcome, which addresses the current imbalances and reduces and limit s trade and production distorting support on the basis of proportionality. We must also focus our negotiations on the core issues of the unfulfilled agriculture mandate, by retaining the flexibilities and producing a meaningful result with a permanent sol ution on public stockholding (PSH) and a comprehensive and balanced outcome on the special safeguard mechanism (SSM). With regard to the reform of the WTO, we believe that MC12 is a key opportunity to update the rules of the organization. We welcome the e fforts made by various Members on this issue, and agree that Ministers at MC12 should provide clear guidance on how to proceed on this matter. To conclude, Madam Director -General, Honduras would like to thank you and the Chair of General Council for your proactive engagement aimed at ensuring a successful Ministerial Conference. It is now up to us, the Members, to work towards achieving effective and necessary outcomes, that are in the interest of each and every Member of this organization. 31. Costa Rica (Jo int Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation) I welcome the opportunity to provide an update on the open -ended negotiations in the context of the Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation. Since my last report, the Initiative has moved a very important step closer to achieving a meaningful outcome in time for the next Ministerial Conference. At the last open -ended meeting on 20 July, the United States announced its decision to join the Initiative and to actively support the conclusion of t his negotiating process by MC12. With the participation of the United States, the total number of Members committed to an outcome stands at 64. These Members comprise most of the 50 largest services traders, as well as some small developing economies, whic h all together account for more than 85% of world services trade. The high level of commitment of services -trading Members is testament to the importance of this negotiation. Above all, as we all know , enhancing transparency and predictability of regula tory frameworks to harness the potential of services trade is a crucial element in the post -COVID economic recovery. Let me emphasize that the positive economic impact of an outcome will spread to all WTO Members, as services suppliers from all Members – including non-participants - will benefit from the reduced trade costs that the negotiations will bring about. Nonetheless, JSI participants are working hard to persuade as many Members as possible to join the Initiative. This is because it is evident that the greatest benefits will come from each Member implementing the disciplines at home, thereby benefitting particularly their own small and medium sized services suppliers. Let me report also that, from our last meeting, it emerged clearly that the Initi ative has moved closer to concluding work on the text -based pillar of the negotiations. Participants have expressed their readiness to exercise the necessary flexibility and pragmatism to solve the remaining outstanding issues in the negotiating text. With MC12 only 4 months ahead, agreeing on a clean Reference Paper will represent a crucial milestone and will facilitate the preparation and exchange of revised draft schedules incorporating improved commitments on services domestic regulation. Madam Chair , just a few weeks ago, the Global Services Summit outlined the clear expectation of hundreds of services businesses around the world that WTO Members deliver a long due outcome on services domestic regulation by MC12. The Initiative has a real opportunity to achieve a result that will have a concrete impact on the operations of services suppliers and will contribute to reinvigorate stakeholders' confidence in the negotiating function of this Organization. We will not squander this opportunity. To conclud e, in keeping with the open, transparent, and inclusive nature of this process, the Initiative is ready to engage with all interested Members, to address any questions, needs, and concerns. I invite all Members not already part of this process to engage ac tively in the discussions and consider joining the Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation. 32. Russian Federation We wish to thank the Director -General for convening this meeting and for her assessment as Chair of the TNC regarding the current situation and her suggestion for our work ahead. I would agree WT/GC/M/19 2 - 197 - with the Chairs of the negotiating bodies and the previous spea kers that we have, indeed, a very intense working schedule for the fall session. MC12 will take place in only three working months and we have to do our utmost in order to deliver a meaningful package for the Conference. On fisheries subsidies, Russia hi ghly appreciates the Director -General's devotion and her personal efforts as well as those of the NGR Chair, to bring us to a successful conclusion of the negotiations. As our Minister said during the 15 July TNC meeting, Russia is ready to actively and co nstructively engage in overcoming the remaining difficulties, although some of them still are of a systemic nature. We suggested to Ambassador Wills some particular ideas regarding technical and organi zational arrangement s of our work in September and Octo ber and we hope that those will be taken on board in the detailed working plan he is going to deliver next week. What we need now is to make a sober and objective assessment of the state of play in the negotiating process, especially when it relates to public outreach. Upon the press conference held on 15 July, the media quoted the following statement made by the Director -General: "We have a text that has been agreed and blessed by all the Ministers and Heads of Delegations". Of course, this phrase was taken out of the overall context of the Director -General's intervention. However, several international media made it central in describing t he outcomes of the event. That was quite confusing and misguiding in the view of my capital, and perhaps in others as well. We admit that there is need for a certain level of optimism regarding the perspective of our negotiations. In fact, there is a famou s joke amongst scientists that, in order to make a breakthrough in scientific discovery, one needs three persons in their team: an optimist, a pessimist and a person with creative thinking. I think we have enough optimists on our team, some of us would also agree to play pessimists. But we now require people with creative ideas. We believe that exaggerated optimism may seriously harm our work at this stage; let us not artificially inflate optimistic expectations, at least publicly . On agriculture, we wish to thank all the delegations that tabled proposals for the CoA -SS meeting held last week. Russia, along with other Members, is looking forward to considering the documents. We hope that over the summer break the membership can explore all the initiatives a nd begin text - based negotiations in the fall. In our view, the most realistic outcome at MC12 on this negotiating track would be the adoption of a clear and detailed roadmap for further negotiations accepted by all Members. Such a roadmap should contain an understanding on key principles for further negotiations, a base for reduction and a list of support programmes subject for future reductions. At this stage, we believe that any figures of quantitative parameters would not be helpful as the outcome of the negotiations should not be predetermined. Since the negotiations are unlikely to be successful without a clear and timely understanding of the current situation regarding agriculture, an outcome on enhancing transparency is critically needed at MC12 as we ll. On other MC12 outcomes, we are looking forward to a balanced result and, in the long term, ensure that the rules -based multilateral trading system responds adequately to the challenges posed to the global economic environment. Russia has put forward a number of specific proposals to improve the deliberative function of the WTO. In particular, we have tabled an initiative on transparency in applied tariffs as well as a communication reflecting our main priorities and expectations for decision - making to be done at MC12. We observe that many of the points we have outlined – in particular regarding WTO reform, the resumption of the work of the Appellate Body, the strengthening of the negotiating function – coincide with the views expressed by many other WT O Members. 33. Moldova Moldova supports the ongoing discussions for MC12 preparations and for WTO response to the pandemic. While we appreciate the Chairs and Facilitators -driven work in keeping this process transparent and inclusive, we also share the view of many other colleagues that we have to focus on priorities, and concrete achievable results. Besides an outcome on fisheries, one of these refers to the discussions on WTO response to pandemic. Moldova is committed to the ongoing work through supportin g the draft Declaration on C OVID -19 and Beyond: Trade and Health Initiative , document WT/GC/W/823, which we believe contains the most relevant and important elements for trade policy related actions designed to contribute to the WTO response to the current COVID -19 pandemic and what is most important to enhance resilience against future pandemics. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 198 - Furthermore, speaking about deliverables, on Joint Initiatives, Moldova fully supports and commends the high level of engagement and hard work of members within all JSIs. As many other Members, we see these Joint Initiatives as potential deliverables by MC12 and beyond. We also welcome very intensive activity and discussions within the TESSD (trade and environmental sustainability structured discussions). On e-moratorium, the Republic of Moldova continues to support the extension of the moratorium on electronic transmissions with a view to mak ing it permanent. We also support the necessity of extension of the moratorium under the Article 64.2 on TRIPS non -violati on complaints. Generally, on the services dimension , we are very pleased to support the ongoing discussions within the Committee on Specific Commitments (CSC) on the improvement of transparency and technical accuracy of specific commitments through condi tional commitments. Moldova is interested in engag ing and support ing proposals/activities aim ed at enhancing clarity, predictability in Members ' Schedules of specific commitments, as well as those targeting a higher liberalization of trade in services. On SPS discussions, Moldova would be interested in any activities focusing on issues related to the transition to sustainable food systems with a view to support the process, while – at the same time – preventing any disguised restrictions on international trade. In the negotiations on agriculture, we commend the active work of Members based on submitted proposals , and we look forward to rec eiving the first draft text for a potential outcome on agriculture, planned to be presented next week. At this point we align to the statement delivered by Panama on behalf of Article XII Members. Additionally, the Republic of Moldova considers it a priori ty to address the existing imbalances between the commitments of Members that acceded to the organization under Article XII and those of the original Members in all 3 pillars of agriculture negotiations, particularly focusing on market access and domestic support. Furthermore, we would like to express our concern related to the impasse created on the appointment of officers for the subsidiary bodies of the CTG, as well as other committees within this house. It is essential that we, as Members of this orga nization , ensure a smooth work of its assisting bodies in a responsible manner. Equally, along with other 120 members, the Republic of Moldova, reiterates its concern on the paralysis of the Appellate Body. This issue must remain a priority for all Membe rs and we will continue to support the necessity and to call upon the resolution of the issues affecting the Dispute Settlement Body. Finally, we reiterate our support for the ongoing accessions and we would be happy to welcome new Members on board. 34. Chile (Structured Discussions on Investment Facilitation for Development) Let me first report on the latest developments regarding the Joint Initiative on Investment Facilitation for Development, in accordance with its open, inclusive, and transparent natur e. I would like to focus on the outcome of the last meeting, held on 12 -13 July, during which participating Members took stock of the progress achieved since the beginning of the year and planned for the work ahead up to MC12. On the occasion, participatin g Members expressed satisfaction with the significant progress achieved in the negotiations. They highlighted the importance of the "Easter Text" circulated last April, which was deemed a milestone in the process , as it allowed negotiations on the basis of a single text and to focus on those matters that need further work. In particular, participants' dedication and constructiveness allowed the group to make progress in two key pillars of the future Agreement, namely Sections II on Transparency of Investmen t Measures and III on Streamlining Administrative Procedures – as well as in most of Section IV on Focal Points, Domestic Regulatory Coherence, Domestic Supplier Databases and Cross-Border Cooperation. Likewise, participants were able to find common langua ge on the "firewall " provision – an issue on which Members have exchanged in length. While participants agree on the importance of promoting sustainable investment, further discussion on Responsible Business Conduct and Measures Against Corruption is still needed. In addition, Small Discussion Groups on Scope and Movement of Business Persons for Investment Purposes, which are WT/GC/M/19 2 - 199 - open to all Members, have made important progress, with notably two text contributions from the Group on Scope. Regarding the priorities for the months ahead, participants have emphasized the need to focus more on the scope of application of the future Agreement, as well as on Section V on Special and Differential Treatment, including technical assistance and capaci ty building , which is key to help developing and least -developed country Members implement the future disciplines. Reflecting this – Dominica and Grenada submitted a comprehensive proposal on special and differential treatment this week. Before the end o f July, I will circulate a first revision of the "Easter Text ", which will reflect the progress achieved since April and lay the groundwork for intensive negotiations in the second semester. The aim of participating Members is to further clean up the text with a view to achieving a concrete -substantive outcome by MC12. The process will continue to be Member -driven and result -oriented. More than 36 proposals have been submitted by a wide array of Members, including several developing countries as well as so me least-developed countries - a case in point is Cambodia, who just recently submitted a proposal on anti-corruption. Investment facilitation can play an important role in supporting economic recovery at this challenging time. Mindful that this initiati ve is "pro-multilateral " we will continue our outreach efforts. Last week, Peru announced that it will also join the initiative and we hope more Members will follow so we can develop the text with a "bottom -up" approach , taking into account the interests and concerns of all, particularly developing countries and LDCs . I want to thank once again participating Members for their commitment and constructiveness. 35. Chile In your meeting invitation you asked us to focus on two points. First, a preliminary assessment of the Ministerial level meeting held on 15 July; second, the topics that could form part of an outcome at MC12. Fisheries subsidies negotiations On fisheries , we would like to congratulate you and the Chair of the negotiations for the Ministerial level meeting last week. The fact that it was the first exercise of its kind in four years and that almost two thirds of our Ministers participated , is in itself an a chievement. Second, the meeting reaffirmed Members' commitment to conclude the negotiations and inject political capital in order to do so by MC12, using the latest version of the Chair's negotiating text. Third, it was also clear from most of the statemen ts that the current text still lacks an adequate balance while giving importance to some considerations that contradict the sustainability of our marine resources. If we want to limit the flexibilities and the political space of all, the major subsidizers must show their readiness to reduce their subsidies. The logic of trying to technically link special and differential treatment to the hybrid approach will not bring us closer to the conclusion of the negotiations. We welcome the report by the Chair of the negotiations and support his outline of the intensive work programme for the coming months. Madam Director -General, we welcome the reports by the Chairs of the negotiating groups and coordinators. We have less than 60 working days before MC12. We need to be realistic and collectively agree that we will not be able to bring to the negotiating table all the topics that we would like. The Ministerial Conference will take place in a complex scenario. Only the most urgent issues should be resolved and be pa rt of the outcome of the Conference – above all, the response to the pandemic, particularly in areas that fall within the competence and functions of the WTO. This response must be holistic, ambitious and balanced , and must provide Members with the tools t o deal with the different challenges arising from the pandemic, while providing a lesson for future pandemics. The world is watching and will judge us for what we are able to achieve. Other organizations have played their part; the WTO must do the same. We need to agree on a process at MC12 to discuss WTO reform without prejudging Members' vision of what that means or what should be included in the reform. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 200 - Apart from the decisions to be taken by Ministers on the moratoria and on key issues in agriculture, beyond transparency, not much more can be expected by November. But as you pointed out this morning, limiting deliverables does not mean that we leave behind or forget the other topics. On the contrary, we must collectively agree on post -MC12 work programm es, in some cases with clear parameters and a clear commitment to embark on these processes. This is not what Chile would have liked as an outcome of the Ministerial meeting, but it is what we now see is realistically possible. Finally, the Ministerial me eting last week highlighted the limitations of virtual meetings. Considering that at this stage a face-to-face MC12 cannot be guaranteed, we must work on its preparation assuming that it will be virtual, which means that the heavy work must be done here in Geneva. We cannot assume that we will be able to rely on our Ministers at the end of November to resolve the issues that we are unable to settle here. 36. Nepal I also thank you for the comprehensive briefing on the state of the play in trade negotiations. I commend the Chairs of Negotiating Bodies for their updates. In the context of the upcoming MC12, the 15 July Ministerial meeting has become an early signal of positive outcomes with some expectations that our Ministers have shown with enha nced level of commitment. I wish to associate our statement with the statement delivered by Chad, on behalf of the LDC Group, Mongolia, on behalf of the LLDC Group and Panama, on behalf of the Article XII Group. In the context of the MC12, I would like t o briefly highlight three priority areas as follows: First, responding to the COVID -19 pandemic in a timely manner, by ensuring access to affordable vaccines and medications for all , specially LDCs and LLDCs , should be our priority at this critical situation. Concluding the text -based negotiation on TRIPS waiver proposal, strengthening trade facilitation, avoiding export restriction, and increasing support in LDCs and LLDs , among others , would be highly desired. Second, bridging the huge gaps in the existing WTO laws and system , in particular between the founding and acceding Members , has become essential for a fair, rule -based, predictable and inclusive world trading system through a meaningful WTO reform. In this context, I would like to recall my v iews expressed in earlier meetings and reiterate my call to constituting a working group to deal with the reform agenda , with a special mandate and a fixed timeline through MC12 , to make needful reforms of the WTO laws and system , to deliver result s for pe ople at large across the globe in a just and inclusive manner. Finally, LDCs and LLDCs have been facing unique challenges and difficulties in their development endeavours and these groups have been the hardest hit by the pandemic. Therefore, a clear road map with a special package of additional support measures for LDCs and LLDCs , has become absolutely necessary for levelling the playing field. Expediting the implementation of existing supports for LDCs, technology transfer, support for bridging the huge d igital divide to benefit from the digital economy through the E -commerce Work Programme, an effective implementation of the service s waiver, simplified rules of origin, capacity building for enhancing export competitiveness, adopting the LDC Group's submis sion on Trade Related Challenges of the LDCs and Way Forward: a Draft for MC Decision , contained in document WT/GC/W/807 ; and adopting an LLDC-specific work programme by the MC12, among others would be some areas of our priority for LDCs and LLDCs. 37. United States I would like to begin by highlighting our call for realism as we undertake our work during a pandemic, which will impact our ability to prepare for MC12. We see little scope for negotiated outcomes and caution against a host of new work p lans or working groups on issues where there is little chance of consensus. The United States urges a targeted approach focused on the WTO 's contribution to recovery from the pandemic, and addressing a manageable set of WTO institutional issues. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 201 - Specifi c MC12 outcomes could include accelerating the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement and proposals on transparency and notifications and on the SPS Agreement. We will also continue to work diligently on special and differential treatment reform and will look for ways that we can use the WTO to make trade a force for good, a means to raise wages and achieve greater economic equality and security for all. We look forward to working with Members on these and other important issues that can make the WTO more relevant to the everyday lives of our people and make MC12 a success. Turning to the fisheries subsidies negotiations, I would like to underscore the statement of my Minister during the WTO Ministerial meeting on July 15. The United States i s committed to working with Members to reach a conclusion to the negotiations, but it must be a meaningful conclusion. While the current negotiating text can serve as the basis for a Member -led, text -based negotiation, it does not yet contain the elements required for reaching conclusion. The United States has proposed a targeted approach to ensure that highlighting and addressing the use of forced labour on fishing vessels are part of any outcome. This is an important way for the WTO to positively impact the lives of our fishers and workers. There are other key elements missing from the negotiating text, and significant shortcomings must be addressed. This includes the approach with respect to special and differential treatment. A blanket approach to special and differential treatment with permanent carveouts is neither appropriate nor effective. It also does not reflect the reality that some self -declared developing country Members are among the largest producers and subsidizers, or among the wealthiest Members of this organization. The United States is committed to continuing to work constructively with Members to reach an agreement that can make a se rious and credible contribution to ending harmful fisheries subsidies. As some Members have noted the proposed funding mechanism, I wanted to comment that we are reviewing the concept note, but have serious concerns with respect to this approach from both a substantive and institutional perspective. Substantively, Members are already providing technical assistance on these matters through a variety of mechanisms, both bilaterally and through other institutions. We question the value of duplicating such ef forts. Moreover, it is difficult to assess the purpose or need for this funding mechanism given the number of open questions remaining in the negotiating text, including the shape of the actual disciplines or the approach to special and differential treat ment. In certain respects, the concept note appears to overstate what is currently contemplated by the Chair 's text. Institutionally, we are greatly troubled with the approach taken by the WTO with previous funding mechanisms, and we are concerned a mecha nism of this nature for fisheries will yield the same result. 38. Sierra Leone Thank you, Madam Chair, for all the work you have been doing for the global community, particularly on COVID -19 and on various issues that are extremely important and dear to us. The most urgent and burning issue for us is the global pandemic. We have been speared with some of the most severe consequences of the COVID -19 pandemic. It has been very destructive in our region; quite a number of people have died, and it has disrupted t he economic activity. I am extremely grateful for the work that you have been doing in pushing the TRIPS waiver. Sierra Leone immensely support s the TRIPS waiver to allow for the ramping up of vaccine production , especially in developing countries. Develop ing countries are disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. We, as an LDC, have only been able to vaccinate up to 2% of the population. The virus is spreading very fast. The recent WT/GC/M/19 2 - 202 - variant has been very deadly – regarding the previous variant, people go t infected but not sick , but currently people are getting sick on a very large scale and actually dying. We are happy that you have been pushing very strongly on this TRIPS waiver. We believe that sharing know -how behind making COVID -19 vaccines is key not only to scale up produc tion, but also to address emerging variants. It is also the case that the TRIPS waiver may accelerate the scaling of some COVID -19 vaccines. It may also encourage existing vaccine products businesses to step up their technology transfer efforts. In this co ntext, we welcome text -based negotiations over a TRIPS waiver at the WTO and call on all Members to exercise flexibility during the negotiations , as the TRIPS waiver can lay an important foundation to an innovation ecosystem. We also would like to thank t he Chairs of the WTO negotiating groups for their reports. I would like to begin with the recently concluded Ministerial TNC meeting held on 15 July. My delegation welcomes the WTO Members' commitment to conclude the negotiations before MC12 in December. The negotiation should state the case that there is consensus on the importance of food and livelihood security of artisanal fishers in developing countries and LDCs like ours. I wish to congratulate the Director -General and Ambassador Santiago Wills for th e successful organi zation and outcome of this meeting. Sierra Leone looks forward to participating constructively in text -based negotiations to this end. We reiterate our commitment to support efforts for a balanced text and an outcome that ensures the sus tainability objectives of the negotiations. Sierra Leone is obviously very much interested in the issue of agriculture. It is an extremely important issue for us. We look forward to receiving a text that is balanced. We continue to encourage discussion s to be Member -driven. In this regard, we believe that support for the African Group's proposal tabled with a view to concretely advance discussions towards a meaningful outcome for MC12 is imperative. In concluding , I wish to talk about WTO reform. Sierra Leone supports the WTO reform agenda and reiterates its commitment to the principles of inclusiveness, fairness and equity as well as the balance of rights and obligations; to the advancement of the interests of developing countries; to the application of differential and more favourable treatment. We look forward to a fair, balanced and development -oriented MC12 package. We reiterate our support for the leadership of the Director -General, for the WTO and for some of the great innovative steps you have been taking to revive this extremely important organization. 39. India Chair, the loss of life and livelihood caused by the pandemic need tangible and meaningful solutions. Solutions that allay the concerns of all and most importantly, address the need s of the developing including least developed Members. In that regard, we have an important task today, to agree on the key deliverables for MC12, that is expected from this organization. COVID -19 is mutating and producing new deadly variants and unfortun ately it is not going on vacation. Vacation/Summer break is needed for healthcare and other frontline workers throughout the globe; not for Geneva diplomats. Can we resume after 2 weeks of break? We need to work and need to deliver. WTO's Response to the Pandemic Chair, in the wake of the pandemic there have been many proposals on the WTO's response to the current pandemic as well our preparedness for future pandemics. We need to work and deliver on some of these proposals quickly. At the same time, we should not try to push market access agenda and take away policy space available for Members and impose cumbersome obligations that serve to benefit a few in the name of pandemic. No doubt, we need to work on supply chain bottlenecks. However , doing away with the legitimate policy instrument of export restrictions or aiming for making temporary elimination of tariffs a permanent measure , or calling for stringent transparency obligations , will not guarantee access to vaccines, therapeutics or d iagnostics, or access to food for the most vulnerable. In fact, such a step is likely to lead to a flight of these critical final finished products to the highest bidder, making them inaccessible to the resource -poor, further aggravating the current divide which we are seeing. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 203 - Chair, the proposal on a waiver from certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement has been discussed threadbare for the past ten months in the TRIPS Council. Despite the agreement among Members in early June to start the text -based nego tiation, it is unfortunate that a few Members have failed to engage in the text-based negotiation. Few Members ensured that we are unable to meet the deadline set by the TRIPS Council Chair for reaching the necessary landing zone by end -July. During COVID -19, only a robust response by the WTO for the pandemic, of which the TRIPS waiver is an integral part, can restore the credibility of this organization. Therefore, it is high time this organization prioritizes saving human lives and livelihoods over all ot her priorities. Even though there are estimates for manufacturing of 11 billion doses by the year end, the doubts remain. In the 21 July event, in order to increase manufacturing, three areas were identified by the Director - General of the World Health Orga nization , and these were technology transfer, supply chain resilience and intellectual property waiver. Chair, let me also point out that we have learnt certain lessons during discussions in the TRIPS Council. While we continue to hear about the importance of a rules-based organi zation, what we are seeing is that the rules and procedures are conveniently and selectively interpreted. Doing so may help few Members on a particular subject, but these selective interpretations are creating precedence which may a lso be used by other Members. Agriculture Chair, millions have regressed deeper into poverty during this pandemic and their food security is another critical issue for this organization. A simple, efficient, and a permanent solution on extending PSH for food security purposes to new programs and new products is therefore a key deliverable. In this regard, I suggest that the new submissions by the Africa Group and the proposal being worked upon by G33 are a good basis for CoA SS to take the process forward . Services Movement of healthcare professionals : a multilateral outcome in this regard will be appreciated, particularly in view of the current pandemic. We need to be aware of new forms of trade barriers in the name of a "selective use of vaccine certif icates". Special & Differential Treatment Madam Chair, let us give a chance to G90 proposals on special and differential treatment . We must show progress on restoring the two-stage dispute settlement system. Fisheries Subsidies The Ministerial TNC on 15 July provided us a good opportunity to take stock of where we are in the negotiations. Listening to the Ministers, it was evident that Members agreed that status quo is not the preferred option because irrational subsidies and overfis hing by many countries is hurtin g the interest s of our fishermen; but it was also evident that significant gaps still exist. I am sure delegations would have analysed and taken note of what the Ministers said. Speakers representing more than 80 delegations said they did not believe the draft consolidated text is balanced to call it a landing zone for them. We heard Minister after Minister calling the text imbalanced and requiring it to be reworked to make it a negotiating text. On the issue of special and d ifferential treatment , once again speakers representing more than 80 delegations said that what the text offers on special and differential treatment is grossly inadequate and they rejected the notion that special and differential treatment should be restr icted to artisanal fishing and that too within 12 nautical miles. They also demanded the text should provide sufficient policy space for developing their future fishing capacities for achieving equitable growth. Ministers/Members emphasized that, if this a greement is about sustainability, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, biggest subsidizers who are responsible for the present state of marine resources , should take greater responsibility and to reduce their subsidies and fishing capacities. Chair, if we truly desire that the WTO should deliver this outcome at MC12, we should admit that it requires huge amount of work to close the gaps and also flexibility on part of Members. Expecting flexibility only from others may not lead us to an end . Any narrative that we have an agreed text would be self -defeating and erodes Member 's trust in the process. Chair, we request that all the statement s made by the Ministers/Members at the 15 July TNC giving the political guidance should WT/GC/M/19 2 - 204 - be released quickly as part of the minutes of the meeting and the Chair 's concluding reports be added as an addendum to it. Global Recovery Chair, it is ironical how differentiated the path to a global recovery is today. The world seems to be moving on tw o separates tracks what is being called K -shaped recovery. Experts have given the economic rationale for accelerated provision of vaccine to the world population. This could be the highest return on public investment. We have made similar economic argument s earlier, but I hope Members will pay heed to the assessment by the experts. Finally, Chair, the WTO must act as a catalyst to minimise the loss of life and livelihood and aid in the acceleration of global economic recovery. MC12 must deliver on critical areas like permanent solution on PSH, TRIPS waiver and a balanced outcome on fish subsidies. This balanced agenda will ensure that while we rebuild and recover, we also restore the waning credibility of this institution. 40. Canada (Structure d Discussions on Trade and Environmental Sustainability ) I will provide a report of the work under the Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions (TESSD), an update on the Ottawa Group, and some thoughts on behalf of Canada. TESSD co -sponsors, other WTO Members, and outside stakeholders met on 19 July to discuss elements for a draft MC12 Ministerial statement on trade and environmental sustainability and to seek feedback on whether this paper contains the right elements. As co -Chairs, Canada and Costa Rica will reflect on the input received and come back to co -sponsors and interested Members with guidance on next steps. Time is short, and we must work efficiently to finalize the text of the Ministerial statement. The objective of the statement, which we hope will be supported by as many Members as possible, is to articulate a desire to advance our understanding of issues at the nexus of trade and environmental sustainability; to lay out a roadmap for our work after MC12; and to underline the importanc e of working transparently and collaboratively with outside stakeholders and experts. This concludes my update on the Structured Discussions. 41. Canada (Ottawa Group) On the Ottawa Group, Ministers met virtually on July 22 to continue discussions on WTO reform with a view to helping ensure a successful MC12. Ottawa Group Ministers discussed trade and health, including a reaffirmation of their commitment to working with co -sponsors of the proposed Trade and Health Declaratio n to continue to build support for it. Ministers also reiterated their support for pragmatic approaches to address issues of importance to both developed and developing Members, including through plurilateral negotiations. Ottawa Group Ministers also had an opportunity to discuss priorities for MC12 with the US Trade Representative, Ambassador Katherine Tai. The fisheries subsidies negotiations and pandemic response were key topics of discussion. Many Ministers recalled the importance of continuing to advance work in agriculture. Ministers also discussed other initiatives and negotiations. Many Ministers welcomed the U nited States to the negotiations on domestic regulation of services and emphasized the importance of concluding them by MC12. In the last few months, the Ottawa Group has advanced work on critical issues and continued to push forward on WTO reform. We are firmly committed to carrying on this work ahead of MC12 and beyond to ensure action on issues of systemic importance. 42. Canada I would also like to share some thoughts on behalf of Canada. With regard to fisheries subsidies negotiations, Ministers have recently given us their support to conclude a meaningful agreement before MC12. The next step is therefore to deepen our understanding of the issues underlying our different positions, and then identify concrete ideas to bridge the remaining differences between us. In agriculture, Members must move forward on domestic support by agreeing on a framework for negotiations subsequent to MC12. We also need to agree on concrete results in agriculture, which WT/GC/M/19 2 - 205 - will include improvements in transparency on applied tariffs, domestic support and export competition. Members should also agree on the exemption of World Food Programme humanitarian purchases from export restrictions. On public stockholding for food security purposes, we remain constructively engaged and have recently presented a technical submission. For Canada, any outcome on this issue for MC12 will need to be commensurate with the level of ambition regarding domestic support. In addition, on sanitary and phytosanitary measures, we need to move forward with a Ministerial Declaration to ensure that the SPS Agreement and Committee are well placed to address emerging challenges. On trade and health, Canada remains committed to contributing to the WTO's efforts with respect to COVID -19 and future pandemics. We support the facilitator's work. We will also continue to promote the proposed declaration on trade and health, a revised version of whic h was circulated last week and will be discussed next week in the General Council. On discussions at the TRIPS Council, we note that the TRIPS Council will report at the General Council next week that it will continue its discussions. Recognizing the imp ortant role that services play in the global economy and recovery, Canada welcomes the level of engagement in exploratory market access discussions in the CTS -SS and is looking to move these forward. On the three negotiating JSIs, Investment Facilitation , Services Domestic Regulations and E-commerce, Canada would like to thank the coordinators, co -conveners, facilitators, and the Secretariat for their hard work. We will continue to engage constructively to make progress by MC12. On Services Domestic Regulation, a conclusion by MC12 is possible, and the recent announcements by the U nited States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia bring us closer. Canada remains ready and willing to engage on reform of the dispute settlement system. To conclude, Chair, Canada sees the next M inisterial Conference as a focussed meeting that sets us on track for the future and has a targeted set of outcomes. 43. Chinese Taipei Let me first thank you for convening this meeting to take stock of the work and to discuss the next steps. We also thank the reports by the Chairs of various negotiation groups. On fisheries subsidies negotiation, the constructive responses from Ministers at the TNC meeting on 15th of July have provided political guidance and support needed for Members to start a new stage of negotiations. We look forward to the intensive two -stage discussions in September and October respectively as arranged by Am bassador Wills. There is a reminder in regard to the fisheries subsidies negotiation: When conducting further discussions, the Chair and Members might want to consider discussing the possible introduction of preambular paragraphs for the instrument. It w ould be unimaginable for such an important instrument without a preamble to guide its future operation. On the issue of the WTO's response to the COVID -19 pandemic, Members generally agree that it should be one of the highest priorities for MC12. We suppo rt the thematic discussion led by Ambassador Walker as early as possible. Concerning the themes to be discussed in the initial stage of discussions, we would suggest to also include the livelihood -related economic recovery aspect of disadvantaged Members a ffected by the pandemic. In addition, considering the cross -cutting nature and the high complexity of the issues, it would also be important for us to reflect whether the current WTO's institutional framework is sufficient to address these issues or whethe r Members should consider creating a new Committee on Trade and Public Health , so as to tackle the related issues in a horizontal and holistic manner. For the remaining months leading to MC12, we would be very pleased to see substantial progresses on JSIs . Particularly, we look forward to finalizing negotiations on Services Domestic Regulation and making substantial progresses on E-commerce and Investment Facilitation Negotiations. These will WT/GC/M/19 2 - 206 - demonstrate to the world that the WTO is able to introduce comme rcially meaningful new rules to respond to the rapidly changing economic environment. On the issues of the WTO and the Appellate Body reform, we share the views that these are amongst the areas of highest importance and that we have to show progress at MC 12. Practically, since we only have three working months left to engage in discussion s on these important issues prior to MC12, it would be unrealistic to produce substantive results. However, it should be possible and important that we start discussing ce rtain detailed work programs as early as possible so that Ministers can adopt them at MC12 to launch the negotiations and that Members can immediately start substantive negotiations on the reform issues thereafter. Chair, we are still optimistic on the me aningful outcomes for some issues at MC12 and stand ready to continue constructively participating in negotiations. 44. South Africa We associate ourselves with the statement by the ACP and the Africa Group. South Africa wishes to reiterate that the develop ment agenda from which the TNC derives its mandate should remain the cornerstone of our work towards MC12. The vaccine inequity is resulting in a two -track recovery process. The AfDB estimates that economic growth in Africa shrank by 2.1% in 2020 due to CO VID-19. The hardest hit were resource -dependent regions . Africa must build better by prioritizing health outcomes and economic recovery that is centred on structural transformation. The long -outstanding issues must remain the focus for the membership and t he Secretariat if we are to achieve the Ministerial mandates and deliver on the WTO developmental imperatives. Over the last 18 months, we experienced socio -economic challenges of alarming proportion, the road to recovery is go ing to be difficult. To get m eaningful and credible outcomes at MC12, we must get our priorities right. In this regard, for South Africa the WTO response to COVID -19 is key. It is however, disappointing that we are still not in solution mode in the text -based negotiations on the TRIP S waiver. This is a necessary , temporary, targeted and proportionate component for any outcome on a WTO response to COVID -19. We want to reiterate that the cost of inaction by the WTO is measured in human lives. We must move beyond ideological debates towa rds a balanced outcome underpinned by a people -centred approach. To make progress we must focus on (i) how to come up with a waiver that addresses the interests and concerns of all and (ii) get out of the binary between the waiver and the European Union proposal. The two are not substitutes but contribute from different perspectives and should both be welcomed with a view to find landing zones on both. A WTO response to COVID -19 is fundamental to a meaningful outcome at MC12. The credibility of the outco me will be judged on the basis of whether it is boosting and diversifying production across the world. Second is agriculture, we need to work on a food security and livelihoods package and in this regard, our views are well articulated in the submissions that the Africa Group recently tabled. The outcome cannot be limited to transparency and a work programme. We will continue to advocate for substantial reform of trade distorting domestic support; including on cotton; as well as PSH and SSM. A decision on the WFP is possible if the ACP proposals are integrated. We underscore that special and differential treatment must be integral to any outcome on agriculture, and must preserve policy space, including under Art 6.2. Third is the Fisheries Subsidies Negot iations, the Chair 's text could form the basis of an outcome , but remains unbalanced in respect of various elements. In order to make progress, the text needs to be reconfigured to more closely align to the mandate to address harmful subsidies and to provi de appropriate special and differential treatment . The flexibilities provided to big subsidizers under the sustainability approach is extraordinarily wide, while special and differential treatment flexibilities that are mandated are narrow in application. Common but differentiated responsibility is going to be critical. The disciplines must target large scale fishing and the biggest subsidizers must take the greatest responsibility. Fourth, we must preserve the principles that underpin the WTO both in ter ms of consensus decision making and special and differential treatment . Multilateralism is important now more than ever. Regarding special and differential treatment , this is a treaty -embedded right and remains important in ensuring fair and equitable outc omes in the WTO. The CTD -SS must deliver on its mandate on WT/GC/M/19 2 - 207 - the G90 A greement Specific Proposals if we are to move forward. The level of ambition cannot be lowered further. We continue to be concerned by the lack of constructive engagement by some Members o n multilaterally agreed mandates. Regarding development, we reaffirm the importance of implementing WTO Ministerial and G eneral Council Decisions, that keep development at the centre of the work program. Further, on e -commerce, the multilaterally mandated work is the Work Programme and the outcome on the e -commerce moratorium at MC12 will depend on clarifications with regard to the scop e and definition of electronic transmissions . We reiterate our position on the TRIPS NVC moratorium. The dysfunctionality of the Appellate Body remains a concern, MC12 must agree on a framework or at least a pathway towards an urgent resolution of this. T his will need to be in its own track given its systemic nature and not be linked to WTO reform discussions. A dysfunctional A ppellate Body renders further negotiations pointless since new and current outcomes cannot be enforced. In relation to WTO reform, the paper on Strengthening the WTO to promote development and inclusivity (WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3) remains our departure point. We must recognize that trade is not an end in itself, it is a means to enhance livelihoods, employment and sustainable development. WTO reform does not mean accepting either inherited inequities or new proposals that would worsen imbalances. Reforms must be premised on the principles of inclusivity and development. On JSI, the paper (WT/GC/W/819) on The Legal status of JSIs and their Negotiated Outcomes captures our views, including the new systemic challenges presented by JSIs. We look forward to a further discussion in the G eneral Council on this. In conclusion, success at MC12 will depend on the delivery of multilateral outcomes. We stand ready to work constructively with Members in this regard. 45. Paraguay We appreciate the reports presented by you and the Chairs. My delegation would like to focus on the following priorities: First, the WTO's response to the pandemic. We thank Ambassador Walker for his report. Paraguay has participated in GRULAC's consultations with Ambassadors Tang and Spencer aimed at moving forward in the Working Subgroup established for this purpose. We believe that the declaration presented jointly by Colombia and Paraguay, on behalf of several Latin American and Caribbean delegations, at the General Council in May represents a good contribution with ideas and deliverables that could be explored by the WTO, particularly in the area of export restric tions, trade facilitation, services and regulatory harmonization, to ensure better and more equitable access to vaccines. We will be circulating a communication within the next few days for inclusion in Ambassador Walker's report. We have also followed wi th great interest the discussion in the TRIPS Council on intellectual property responses. We repeat , we are a country that does not have local vaccine production capacity, and it is therefore imperative for our delegation to find a consensus solution that allows us to have immediate and effective access to the importation of vaccines against COVID -19. Second, agriculture is a priority topic for Paraguay. The reform cannot continue to expand. Four months away from the Ministerial Conference, the submission of extreme proposals that will not lead to consensus will only benefit those Members seeking to maintain the status quo. Regarding domestic support, we consider that document JOB/AG/117/Rev.2 is the most realistic and feasible basis for a Ministerial outc ome in this pillar. We reiterate our call to Members who are really interested in advancing the reform to explore joint avenues for the incorporation of their interests with consideration of their sensitivities in this context. On market access, we reiter ate that this pillar is absolutely a priority for my delegation, and any Ministerial outcome should include the way to revitalize these negotiations, which can deliver greater trade benefits. As mentioned by the delegations of Uruguay, Ecuador and Argentin a, we believe that WT/GC/M/19 2 - 208 - document JOB/AG/198 is a realistic contribution towards moving forward on this pillar, with a view to the development of post -MC12 modalities. With regard to other topics, we understand that in order to achieve a balanced and consensus - oriented outcome , they should be part of the agenda. However, the level of ambition of these should be comparable to the overall level of ambition in the negotiations. In this regard, and as we did in CoA SS recently, we note that a permanent solution on p ublic stockholding would not appear to be a realistic and achievable outcome for this Ministerial Conference. The recently submitted proposals cannot form the basis for our negotiations, since they do not address the concerns of non-proponents and would no t lead to the consensus required. We remain open to discussing constructive ways to move forward on all the mandates. We reiterate that transparency is not and cannot be an end in itself, and a Ministerial outcome that adjusts certain notification formats or makes improvements to computer systems without addressing improvements in the rules would not be sufficient for us. Moreover, we once again note that attempts to accommodate the rules and behaviour of Members would generate additional obstacles to the advancement of outcomes on transparency for MC12. On the SPS Ministerial Declaration, of which we are proponents along with almost 40 Members, we hope that it can be adopted multilaterally and that the work programme we seek to establish can contribute to advancing discussions on the challenges that we face today and will have to face in the future. We invite all Members to join these efforts and hold constructive discussions on the scope of the proposal. In conclusion, we reaffirm our commitment to moving forward on the Joint Initiatives on E-commerce, Investment Facilitation for Development, MSMEs, Services Domestic Regulation, and Trade and Environment. We would like to emphasize that in the plenary of yesterday's E commerce initiative, together with Ecuador and Guatemala, and supported in the room by a number of countries in the region, we focused on the importance of development issues. Hence , we are exploring the possibility of presenting a discussion paper on the development dimension soon in the context of this initiative. 46. Colombia I am making this statement on behalf of Ambassador Santiago Wills, who in this sess ion is focusing on his work as Chair of the fisheries subsidies negotiations. The delegation of Colombia thanks the Chairs of the negotiating groups for their reports and for their dedicated work, and also recognizes the direct engagement and dedication o f the Director -General in the various matters, with the aim of achieving concrete outcomes for the Ministerial Conference (MC12). I will mention four specific points in this statement that are of fundamental importance for Colombia, relating to the ongoing negotiations from which we hope to have positive outcomes for MC12, without prejudice to the fact that we would like to make progress on many other topics, which we do not mention expressly in this statement. First, in the fisheries subsidies nego tiations, we welcome the very positive results of the Ministerial level meeting on 15 July. Not only the large number of high-level participants but also the commitment and willingness of Ministers to conclude the agreement before MC12 , reaffirm that we are very close to achieving an outcome with the level of ambition that the present time calls for. Colombia supports the work plan for the month of September onwards, presented today in the report, and is committed to moving forward vigorously with text-based negotiations and finding points of convergence. Second, in agriculture, as is known, it is a priority for Colombia to move forward on the domestic support pillar. Indeed, state subsidies to agriculture have a trade distorting effect that prevents a level playing field in international markets, to the detriment of medium sized and small countries, in addition to the harmful effects of subsidies in terms of environmental sustainability. Members must make ambitious and proportional contributions to reduce t hese distortions. The domestic support framework sponsored by multiple Members offers an ambitious and flexible path that we hope will WT/GC/M/19 2 - 209 - serve as a point of reference, will create more and more convergence and will allow the negotiations to be intensified in the second half of the year. Third, with regard to trade and health, we are grateful for Ambassador Walker's work in facilitating these discussions and for his report. This is a highly relevant issue in the current pandemic situation and requires concret e outcomes. Colombia, together with a group of Latin American countries, has expressed on several occasions its deep concern about a number of trade practices that hinder and limit the importation of vaccines, and therefore deprive our citizens of timely a nd equitable access to these goods. We have also put forward ideas to improve the collective response to the pandemic using the tools of the multilateral trading system, for example through deeper actions to avoid export restrictions, discussion of common regulations and standards, dialogue on the temporary movement of health professionals, and mechanisms for facilitating trade in essential goods. The General Council will address a number of initiatives on these matters and endorse the methodology proposed by Ambassador Walker. Colombia is ready to participate actively in the thematic dialogues and sessions, with a view to achieving convergence between the views and proposals. The joint work to be undertaken from September must lead us to a multilateral res ponse to this pandemic, which, far from coming to an end, continues to affect the economic and health systems of developing countries. Lastly, with respect to the initiatives for WTO reform, Colombia considers that this is a key issue for the relevance an d future prospects of the rules-based trading system. A frank and determined dialogue is required to lay the foundations for this process, which must place the WTO at the forefront of global trade trends and prevent further delay in the development of glob al rules. This involves addressing issues such as trade in services, e -commerce, investment, and of course trade related environmental issues. Moreover, and without further delay, MC12 must find a practical and pragmatic solution with respect to the two -tier dispute settlement mechanism. Of course , Colombia is ready to participate actively and constructively on an ongoing basis in this process. 47. United Kingdom Thank you very much, D irector -General and thanks also to the Chairs of the various Committees and Negotiating Groups, Informal Working Groups and the rest who have briefed us on their work in the course of the day. As you and indeed the Chair of the General Council reminded us , we have a part icularly long agenda for the General Council next week which allows us to spend even more time in this marvellous building. Now, I am not sure whether that is a good thing or a bad thing. On the bad side, I suspect it shows that we have probably got too mu ch on the table for MC12 and that we need to narrow down that agenda after the summer break and certainly my delegation will be ready to be here on 1st September, ready, able and a little tanned from the Genevois sun and keen to make progress. I think th ere is also a good side to it because I think it shows that delegations right across the membership see the WTO as a vehicle to tackle some of the big issues of the day. That is a good thing for us. We want to address the economic and human cost of the pan demic of which so many people here today have spoken, and rightly, countries which are right in the thick of the pandemic right now. A 100 days away from the COP26 summit in Glasgow , it reminds us that we need to play a role in addressing climate change. J ust this week our own country released a border trade report on green trade , and we have also announced our plans for our own new developing countries trading scheme consultation , which inspires to be more sustainable as well as simpler and more ambitious and more pro -growth. We have a choice as to whether we wish in this organization to be enabling the green revolution in the global economy or merely to watch from the side -lines. And third , the other good point I think is that there is a widespread recogni tion, as our Icelandic colleague and others have commented, that this organization has a role to play in helping the 10 million plus women -owned MSMEs across the globe. We have a role to play, if we want, in empowering those businesses and inseminating the global economy. I take positives away from the fisheries subsidies Ministerial the other week. Not least the extraordinary commitment that you have shown, that Santiago has shown to bringing us to a solution. And as others said , the failure of this orga nization to reach agreement on this negotiation after 20 years would be a pretty bad blow to multilateralism in this organization. More broadly it WT/GC/M/19 2 - 210 - would show that we can't actually meet the sustainable development goals that are own leaders have signed up to and it's not good news for our fish or our fishing communities . We really do need to make an effort and I pay tribute to Santiago for his plans to really knuckle down on this in September. Secondly, we pay tribute to you , indeed , to Dr Tedros and Da ren Tang at WIPO , for bringing us together in the symposium on Wednesday. There are clearly still issues that divide us here, but I think your attempts to focus on practical solutions and practical ways in which through greater public/private collaboration and greater international collaboration we can really address quickly and effectively this issue about vaccine equity , is to be commended and we will work with you and others to that end. Third, the other positive I take from today and from recent weeks is the dynamism of the plurilateral negotiations in this house, and I would really like to offer my own warm welcome to the decisions by the United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia this week to join the Services Domestic Regulation effort. I think t hat it is a really important piece of work and one which should be taken forward. As others have said , there is an important piece of work that we need to be taking forward on WTO reform , including clearly dispute settlement but also issues like market dis torting practices. So, the question is how do you find common ground between all these different ideas , between the bad and the sometimes good ? By recognising partly that all these issues are important to some or all of the delegations here, but also that they can be taken forward in different ways at different speeds and in different ways. Director -General, as you said at our informal meeting yesterday, some, we hope , are going to be substantive outcomes for MC12. Some may be the subject of new work prog rammes, new processes. Some will be taken forward multilaterally, some will be taken forward plurilateral, that is the nature of this organization as it has developed over the years. I think our job when we come back in September and indeed at the G eneral Council meeting next week is to listen to each other, respect each other's priorities, ask ourselves some hard questions about how different issues can best be taken forward in this organization and at MC12. But also to focus on another controversial idea in this house, to focus on substance over process and to try and really work out how MC12, how this organization , could add real value to this work. And in the competition between Chinese and Nigerian proverbs and the works of Wittgenstein let me add the w ords of the great Scottish Poet, Rabbie Burns , "now's the day and now's the hour". 48. Malaysia Firstly, I must thank all the negotiating group Chairs for their reports. After listening to Chairs ' reports and Members ' remarks this morning, allow me to share my delegation 's views and perspectives on the following: Concluding the Fisheries Subsidies negotiations is an immediate priority for all of us. From the Ministerial Level TNC on Fisheries Subsidies held last Thursday, it was obvious that no Members had disputed that we need to conclude these 20 long years of negotiations. However, while Malaysia is committed to conclude the negotiations as soon as possible, the importance of positioning fisheries in the context of food security and national economy for m any Members cannot be overstressed. For this reason, we hold the view that the outcome of this negotiations must reflect the WTO principles of non -discriminatory trade, predictability and transparency, fair competition, and encouraging development and econ omic reform. On agriculture, it is imperative to make meaningful progress in agriculture for a fair agriculture trading system. The d omestic support pillar remains a priority for many Members , including Malaysia. We need to start text -based negotiations as soon as possible after summer break. On the dispute settlement mechanism, we truly hope that the Appellate Body impasse could be resolved expeditiously, and to restore the WTO 's two -stage dispute settlement function before the Ministers meet in Decembe r. On the WTO's response to the COVID -19 pandemic, I commend the General Council Chair on the appointment of Ambassador Walker as the facilitator. It is our hope that the various works on response to pandemic to be further streamlined as we are approachin g MC12 in a couple of months ' time. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 211 - Overall, Madam Chair, we must begin prioritising key issues and focus on the low hanging fruits. We also hope that the facilitator -led process would help streamline our work in various areas in a transparent and inclusiv e manner. On logistics, we are quite concerned as we are still not able to firm up on the arrangements on the format of meeting 49. Jamaica (ACP Group ) The ACP Group thanks you for your report. We also thank the Chairs of the WTO negotiating groups for their reports. As we move closer to MC12, it is important that we accelerate the consolidation of the package to be presented to Ministers. Fisheries Subsidies We thank you for an excellent job in the organization of the Ministerial TNC of 15 July. The A CP Group considers it a useful session. We listened to Ministers ' commitment to concluding negotiations as soon as possible. We heard Ministers reiterating that we adhere to the mandate of MC11 and raised concerns with regards to the imbalances in the text . Particularly, we take note that Ministers have ruled out the option of special and differential treatment being limited to artisanal and small -scale fishing or transition period s with technical assistance and capacity building. We listened to the majorit y of the 104 Ministers who took the floor calling for special and differential treatment in the form of policy space to facilitate the responsible development of the fisheries sectors in developing countries and LDCs. We will participate constructively in text-based negotiations to this end, especially in light of Ministers overwhelming conclusion that a lot of work is needed to bring balance to the consolidated text. It is our goal to ensure that an outcome is effective in the global fight against IUU fi shing and global fish stock depletion , target major subsidizers and large -scale industrial fishing , provide policy space for smaller fishing nations, and not contain loopholes that can be easily used as a pretext to maintain the status quo. Common but diff erentiated responsibility should underpin the outcome. Agriculture Turning to agriculture, the ACP Group takes note of the Chair 's intention to circulate a draft text next week. This could assist us in advancing our work for MC12. We await its content an d will engage in a solution -seeking mode. Agriculture is too important for ACP Group Members to allow for yet another Ministerial to pass without an outcome on this file. We expect the text to pursue balance, inclusivity and we believe discussions should b e Member -driven. Our priorities in the negotiations are PSH, SSM, cotton and trade distorting domestic support. Given the thrust towards rural development and agricultural reform , we expect a maintenance of Article 6.2. We expect these elements to be refle cted in the text to be circulated. An outcome package based only on transparency does not reflect the critical role that the WTO plays in global agricultural trade. The WTO must do more. Services MC12 provides an opportunity for the WTO to play an impor tant role in the rebuilding process and in our quest for bolstering the resilience of the services sector in developing countries and LDCs. As is well known, the services sector is significantly impacted by the pandemic. In that context, engagement with a view to promote the recovery of the sector and address the negative impact of the pandemic on the services sector, including through the in -built flexibilities for developing and least developed countries , will be critical. E-commerce As it relates to th e e-commerce moratorium, we need to continue discussions on issues surrounding the moratorium as well as issues relating to the digital divide. We are working on technical papers on various issues. We need to focus on how we can reinvigorate the Work Progr amme given our specific interest on the development dimension of this longstanding area of work in the multilateral framework of the WTO , and believe that MC12 provides an avenue to pursue these objectives. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 212 - Development On special and differential treatme nt, the ACP Group aligns itself with the Declaration by the G90 contained in WT/GC/234, which will be discussed under agenda item 13 of the General Council meeting. Special and differential treatment is a fundamental pillar of the WTO and should not be dispensed with in current nor future agreements. We believe that an outcome for MC12 based on the G90 proposals would assist our national efforts to stabilize our trade imbalances, including those arising from the COVID -19 pandemic, build back better and successfully integrate into the global economy and global trading system. We therefore call for constructive engagements on this file. Intellectual Property Turning to TRIPS -related issues, Chair, vaccination remains the most durable solution to the COVID -19 pandemic. Yet, our Members do not have equitable access, while there are Members in possession of more than required to inoculate their entire population. With this in mind, we have already seen an emergence of measures prohibiting the entry of unvaccinated people in some economies. Undoubtedly, this will negatively impact the ACP Group 's economies with our low level of vaccination due to lack of access to vaccines. Our economies are highly dependent on international trade, and our nationals, inclu ding those who travel to provide services, are wi tnessing restrictions on their participation in international trade. The WTO has an important role to play in facilitating swift, timely, affordable and equitable access to the vaccines and therapeutics to c ombat the pandemic. The proposals in IP/C/W/669, we believe, seek to respond to these issues. We have consistently supported its general objectives. We must resolve the issue of access. We also think our approaches should assist us in using the TRIPS to de al with future pandemics. WTO's response to COVID -19 We take note of ongoing work in various formats on the WTO 's response to the impact of the COVID - 19 pandemic. Our governments have had a very painful experience with the virus, both from an economic a nd social perspective. We look forward to seeing these efforts progress to maturity , so that a decision can be taken by Ministers at MC12. WTO Reform On reform, the ACP Group remains committed to the principles of inclusiveness, to fairness, and equity i n the balance of rights and obligations , to the advancement of the interests of developing countries through the application of differential and more favourable treatment , and seeking to ensure that trade functions at all times as an instrument for raising standards of living and employment, and for promoting sustainable development. The ACP Group believes that the vital interests of Members would be greatly compromised should the reform and modernisation sought not be anchored in these enduring values. Loo king towards MC12, the ACP Group continues to prioritize the restoration of the proper functioning of the two -tier Dispute Settlement System. Ministers should also be presented with a Reform Work Programme consistent with the principles that we have outlin ed. In closing, Chair, we look forwards to these developing interests being a part of an outcome package for MC 12. We will engage positively and do so in a solution -seeking mode. The WTO will miss a golden opportunity, presented by the environment in whi ch we operate, if we ignore or minimise the views of others that emanate from their unique circumstances. The crafting of an MC12 package should be done in a fair, balanced and development -oriented manner. Resolving these issues by MC12 is critical to our stabilization and rebuilding efforts in light of the COVID -19 impact on our trade capacity and development goals. 50. Turkey We thank you, D irector -General , and the Chairs of Negotiating Bodies for the updates and information provided on recent activities a s well as suggestions for the way forward. Let me share the issues that Turkey believes we should further focus our attention on in the run up to MC12. First, fisheries subsidies negotiations; the sustainability of fisheries resources is indeed crucial fo r all our nations. It is our debt for next generations and to our planet to conclude these negotiations as soon as possible. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 213 - Last week 's meeting at Ministerial level confirmed the high -level commitment among Members. We all acknowledge that significant gap s still remain in substantive areas which require hard and intense work ahead. To this end, we are ready to work in every configuration, as long as transparency and inclusiveness is ensured. In this regard, we support the workplan announced by Ambassador W ills this morning. Second, the pandemic. In this area also, a lot of work is needed to bridge the gaps and find a possible landing zone. Members continue to be divided between different approaches and we believe that each proposal has its own merits. To secure an outcome, all sides should show flexibility and good -will, act constructively and seek common ground. Addressing concerns raised about the existing proposals in a swift manner is equally important. The potential outcome must make a significant and real contribution to the daily fight against the pandemic in every country. Due to the urgency of the actions needed, we believe we should focus on common denominators where all membership can come around and discuss long-term agendas after we deal with t his urgency. Madam D irector -General , we fully support your third way approach and believe that it significantly contributes to the WTO 's relevance. Third, Appellate Body. We will have a M inisterial Conference when this organization lacks one of its strongest features. Its absence has a devastating effect on the rules-based multilateral trading system. The Appellate Body is a must for trade in a predictable environment. We should restart discussions as early as possible to restore the two -tier dispute settlement system. Fourth, agriculture. Turkey is committed to reach an outcome in this field , with a priority on domestic support pillar. Current methodology , which provides some Members huge flexibility , has been impeding the level playing field for a long time now. Turkey also supports the PSH proposal for food security purposes , which was submitted by the G33. Another priority is SSM , to protect agricultural markets from import surges that may lead to devastating results for poor and vulnerable farmers. We need meaningful and balanced outcomes in agriculture. We hope that Members will be able to bridge the gap in these areas before MC12. Apart from the multilateral agenda, I will also touch upon very briefly on plurilate rals. We are pleased with the good progress in respective JSIs and very much welcome outcomes during MC12. On your question about how to move these issues forward from September to MC12, let me just mention a few keywords, some of them was also highlight ed by you, the Chairs of the negotiating bodies and Members : using the time more wisely, an excellent planning, inclusiveness, transparency, a further focused work, a result and solution -oriented approach, constructive engagement, flexibility and compromis e. 51. Bangladesh First of all, I thank you, Madam Chair, for convening the informal TNC meeting. Holding this after the Ministerial level meeting is very timely. I hope this will help spe ed up the negotiation process on various important trade issues as we strive to achieve some tangible outcomes at MC12. I would reiterate what you said in your introduction, if we want concrete outcomes, we have to utilize this very little time and every little opportunity that we have at our disposal before MC12. We than k the distinguished Chairs of the different negotiating groups for their comprehensive presentations on the status of negotiations in their respective areas. I cannot agree more that we need to make further progress in order to contribute to the deliverabl es of MC12 and thereby strengthen the multilateral trading system. We echo the views of others on the ongoing negotiation of fisheries subsidies. I believe that the 15 July Ministerial level TNC meeting gave us some directions to work for reaching consen sus, taking due care of the concerns of developing countries, particularly of the LDCs. In this regard, a summary reflecting the views expressed by our Ministers during the Fisheries TNC would be highly appreciated. It would help us navigate in the right d irection and find convergence. Let me reemphasize that if we want to have the fisheries subsidy document as a possible deliverable of the forthcoming MC12, we WT/GC/M/19 2 - 214 - have to limit our debates within the mandate. Any deviation or derogation will only make things complicated and our job difficult. On the proposal to create a trust fund for the fisheries discipline, we are considering the concept note that we received recently. Countries like ours need technical assistance and capacity building in various areas. So, we look at this proposal from that perspective. However, such funds have to be adequate, predictable, effective and beneficial. Moreover, such fund should not substitute the broader demand for special and differential treatment for certain categories of c ountries on the basis of development. In this regard, we have heard your reassuring voice. As you are aware, the LDC group has a submission under consideration by the General Council of the WTO. Before commenting on that, I like to take this opportunity to thank the Members once again for approving the LDC submission on the extension of transition under TRIPS Article 66.1. Now, the other submission of the LDC Group, as you know, is at the General Council seeking extension of LDC specific special and differential treatment and other support measures for a certain period after graduation. Again, we are most thankful to the G eneral Council Chair Ambassador Dacio Castillo for his informal consultations with different groups and individual delegations. The LDC group has recently received some inputs f rom different delegations and we are working on these. We hope that Members will favourably consider this submission as an achievable outcome for the forthcoming Ministerial Conference . The COVID -19 pandemic is continuing its devastation around the world with second and third waves , and we are not sure when we will have a respite. Some countries are opening up their eco nomies with substantial progress in vaccination , whereas most others are struggling to control the pandemic with very little vaccine coverage. This unequal and inequitable situation with regard to vaccination is not going to secure us as nobody is safe, if everybody is not safe. The production and distribution of vaccines, therapeutics and other medical equipment necessary for the prevention, containment, and treatment of COVID -19 should be available to all, irrespective of who we are, where we are. In the immediate term, we need to scale up vaccine production through the sharing of technology and formulas with those pharmaceutical industries who have the capacity to produce vaccines , located in various parts of the world. We appreciate your role Madam D irector -General in brin ging important stakeholders , including the WHO across the table to discuss possible way forward. We want to see tangible progress. In our view, TRIPS or any other instruments should not hinder unconditional, affordable, equita ble and timely access to medical advances made in fighting this deadly virus. Therefore, we would like to see completion in the negotiations of the waiver proposal at the TRIPS Council. We thank Ambassador Walker for his informal consultations with differe nt groups and individual delegations to find an early outcome. Finally, we look forward to working closely with all Members and engaging constructively in all the pending negotiations in the coming days. 52. Egypt Thank you, Madame Director -General, for gi ving me the floor and for your sincere efforts to achieve concrete deliverables in MC12. We also thank the Chairs of the WTO negotiating groups for their thorough reports. Egypt would like to associate itself with the statements delivered by Mauritius and Saudi Arabia on behalf of the African and Arab Groups, respectively. Time remaining till MC12 is very short. That is why I believe , like many of us , that we must be rational about the deliverables we can achieve on the multilateral level during the Ministerial, taking into consideration the limitations imposed by the pandemic. We need to urgently decide on the format of MC12 in a realistic manner that would ensure equal participation for all Members, given that we cannot predict how the pandemic will evo lve in the upcoming months. WT/GC/M/19 2 - 215 - Speaking of the current global health crisis and its severe impact on the global economy, especially on developing countries, we should work towards an agreement during MC12 on a set of support measures highlighting the importa nt role the WTO can play in facilitating timely, affordable and equitable access to vaccines and therapeutics to combat the pandemic. We reiterate that WTO Members should collectively reach a comprehensive response package that includes a consensus reach ed on the TRIPS waiver proposal, and addresses all the broader concerns pertaining to supply -side constraints hampering vaccine production. In this regard, I would like to highlight the constructive contribution of the Joint WTO -WHO Meeting held last Wedne sday, and we commend you Madame D irector General for your continued efforts in bringing together all relevant stakeholders, including international organizations and the private sector, to help Members further understand the relevant challenges, such as th ose related to financing, incentivizing research and production, raw material availability, and export restrictions, and the list goes on . I need not repeat our negotiating position on fisheries subsidies that was stated during the TNC Ministerial on 15 July, which we believe was a good opportunity to mobilize political will towards reaching an outcome on this long overdue issue. In addition, we thank you Madame Chair and Ambassador Wills for sharing the concept note entitled "Fisheries Subsidies WTO Fundi ng Mechanism " and welcome this initiative , as long as it is not a substitute for special and differential treatment in the text of the Agreement. We look forward to further constructive engagement with you and the membership on finalizing its elements. On agriculture, the number of new proposals and communications presented in the COA SS meetings this week testifies the interest of Members to achieve an outcome come MC12. We refer to the proposals by the African Group regarding the historical imbalances in this important sector of international trade. We hope that a concrete outcome can be achieved, particularly in the mandated issues , and we urge Members to give priority to proposals that will contribute to improving food security in developin g countries during the pandemic. On development, we highlight that the impact of the current pandemic on developing countries and LDCs has exacerbated the economic and developmental challenges they face, and thus we call upon our development partners to t ake a fresh look at the G90 agreement -specific proposals in the CTD-SS in the context of the pandemic , and away from the political debate about special and differential treatment. On WTO reform, we believe that MC12 offers a good opportunity to give struc ture to our reform efforts. We need to engage in a serious dialogue on the wider balanced reform agenda that addresses the three intertwined core functions of this organization; namely we must restore the dispute settlement function, revitalize the negotia ting function, and activate the deliberative function with improved transparency. Needless to say, we must construct such an agenda with development at its core. Hence, adopting a visionary work program to that effect at MC12 would contribute to restoring credibility in the multilateral trading system and empower the WTO to face the unprecedented global challenges it faces. Scoring wins on individual negotiating subjects is no doubt needed. At the same time, we need to also address systemic challenges that hinder the functioning of this organization. To conclude Madame Chair, we stand ready to work constructively and in good faith with all Members towards meaningful and balanced outcomes at MC12 and beyond. Finally, I wish you all a well- deserved summer break after the G eneral Council meetings. 53. Chad (LDCs) On behalf of the LDC Group, I would like to thank you for convening this meeting and for presenting your report on the status of the WTO negotiations. I would also like to thank t he Chairs of the negotiating groups who have reported to us on the work of their respective bodies. On fisheries subsidies, the LDC Group welcomes your engagement and congratulates you on the success of the TNC meeting at Ministerial level. We need to con tinue with this momentum. We believe it is essential to take account of the concerns expressed by the LDCs. Responding to the expectations of artisanal fishers, including poor and vulnerable fishers, is a key element of special and differential treatment. From this perspective, an exemption from the main WT/GC/M/19 2 - 216 - ban on subsidies that contribute to overcapacity and overfishing, as contained in Article 5.5(a) of the Chair's revised text, is an equally important component of special and differential treatment. We also reaffirm the importance of technical assistance to LDCs and welcome the idea of a trust fund to support and complement the fisheries agreement. With regard to the discussions on COVID -19 vaccines, the LDC Group welcomes the text -based process for initia ting negotiations. Indeed, the urgency is increasing due to the proliferation of new variants. Our Group also welcomes the fact that, in less than nine months after the onset of the COVID -19 pandemic, the scientific community has developed vaccines. It is difficult to accept that 18 months after the outbreak of the pandemic, we are still not in a position to make this discovery accessible, and thus provide the basis of a response to help address this global public health challenge. The relevance of the mul tilateral trading system and the significance of the World Trade Organization are at stake. We take this opportunity to commend you for your efforts and for holding a high-level dialogue with the World Health Organization and the World Intellectual Proper ty Organization as part of discussions with industry and other stakeholders , to explore solutions to accelerate production and access to vaccines. Such solutions should be brought into line with the waiver proposal in order to respond to the global emergen cy situation. We welcome the approach to integrate possible solutions within a multilateral framework, with transparency and inclusivity as fundamental principles in the process. With regard to agriculture, the growing impact of the COVID -19 pandemic on o ur food security, as a result of the surge in food prices, underscores the relevance of the African Group submission contained in JOB/AG/206, which highlights a number of important areas where agricultural trade rules require reform. We are in favour of tr ansparency and encourage transparency in the area of export competition. However, the notification requirements must be commensurate with the level of development of Members and should not add to the workload of LDCs in particular. In addition, we must giv e priority to the current challenges of reducing domestic support. The negotiating framework to discuss reductions in domestic support must be fair and balanced. On the issue of cotton, we urge Members to take into account the next C -4 submission aimed at providing modalities for negotiations on the three pillars of export competition, domestic support and market access. We support the work of Ambassador Gloria Abraham Peralta, which will facilitate a possible text on agriculture for MC12. The LDC Group al so wishes to congratulate Ambassador Kadra Ahmed Hassan for his effective management of the work in the Committee on Trade and Development in special session. Our Group stands ready to engage constructively and pragmatically on issues in the G 90 context o n specific proposals submitted. The LDC Group reaffirms its full commitment to the ongoing negotiations and other work of the WTO. We support a strong, equitable and inclusive multilateral trading system that respects the rule of decision making by consen sus in the WTO. We look forward to Members having a constructive state of mind with a view to achieving fruitful outcomes in relation to the 12th Ministerial Conference. The LDC Group will soon submit its consolidated proposals for MC12 on its priorities, including LDC graduation, technology transfer, agriculture, implementation of preferential rules of origin and WTO reform. We hope to provide relevant elements with a view to strengthening the important role that the WTO can play in global governance, in particular on trade regulation in terms of rulemaking , deliberations and implementation. Lastly, Madam Chair, regarding the Ministerial Conference, we thank you and the Chair of the General Council for your commitment and efforts to ensure an efficient organization of the Ministerial Conference this year. From this perspective, we would need to have more information on travel, COVID -19 testing, vaccines and quarantines, which may be necessary to attend the Geneva -based event. On virtual access to the Conference, it is important to ensure the proper functioning of connections and facilities, including drawing up a "plan B" for any possible difficulty when LDC ministers take the floor. We found that the Ministerial meeting on fisheries subsidies seemed to work well in virtual mode. However, the WTO could begin now to gather information to assess the difficulties, if any, WT/GC/M/19 2 - 217 - experienced by Ministers from the LDCs. We should anticipate all possible issues that could arise for LDCs that have connection problems. Whatever the approach in trade negotiations, there is a need for understanding and flexibility in order to move in the same direction towards a positive and constructive outcome for all. We are aware that there is still a lot of work to be done for Members to reach agreements. However, we maintain a positive approach, and we remain committed, as far as possible, despite our numerous constraints. We are wholehearted in our willingness and we will continue to work constructively. 54. Viet Nam First, I would like to thank you, Madam Director -General, for convening this meeting which is a very good opportunity for the membership to reflect on the TNC Ministerial meeting held on 15 July and on the preparations for MC12. We also thank the Chairs of the negotiating bodies for their respective reports. Second, with regard to fisheries subsidies negotiations, we share the assessment made by the Chair of the Negotiating Group on Rules. While the answers to both questions are mostly affirmative – which gives us confidence in the process – gaps between positions remain among a number of Members remain concerning key elements in the negotiating text. In this regard, we also share the stance of urgenc y to work harder to find a landing zone so that the negot iations can be concluded before MC12. Hence, we support the workplan that Ambassador Wills outlined to deal with the key differences , before coming back to line -by-line textual negotiations . Given that Ministers at the 15 July TNC Ministerial meeting autho rised Heads of Delegations to move the negotiations forward, we suggest that delegations be immediately involved in resolving the key issues when the negotiations resume after the summer break. Third, on agriculture, we agree that agriculture is critical ly important in terms of livelihoods and food security, poverty eradication and socio -economic development. We support agriculture reforms for sustainable development, ensuring a fair and undistorted agriculture production and trade. We call for continued support and constructive engagement to discuss the work on negotiations on domestic support in agriculture, humanitarian purchase of food for the World Food Programme, and our joint proposal on an SPS Declaration at MC12. Fourth, we highly appreciate the High-level Dialogue co -hosted by Madam Director -General and the WHO Director -General, to step up efforts to increase COVID -19 vaccine production and equitable access. We are of the view that the demonstration of the WTO's concrete and effective response t o the pandemic by MC12 is a common goal of the membership , as t he WTO is a part of the global efforts in coping with the pandemic as mentioned in many ASEAN/APEC Leaders and Ministers' statements. We thank the facilitator of the multilateral process, Ambas sador Walker, for sharing with us his response ideas in a structured manner. We support his outline noting that the response contains a great deal of substance. We support having an independent document as well, in the form of a decision, to be action -oriented , but it can also be flexible in the form of a declaration to achieve consensus. Given the pressing need for an effective response to the pandemic, we support pushing forward text -based discussions on the proposed TRIPS waiver and start text -based dis cussions on the WTO's response to the pandemic as soon as possible. Fifth, we support continuing the WTO reform discussions to ensure the WTO's relevance, especially on dispute settlement to restore the full operation of this very important function of t he WTO. It is also one of the greatest desires of Viet Nam and almost all Members. Of course, we support resuming discussions on this issue at the General Council level for results at MC12. Finally, Viet Nam reaffirms its commitment to working closely an d constructively with you, Madam Director -General, and with other Members for the preparations towards a successful MC12. 55. Peru Fisheries Subsidies My delegation would like to reiterate its gratitude to you and Ambassador Wills for your hard work in organizing the successful ministerial meeting we had last week in the context of this committee, which without doubt gave a fresh boost to these negotiations. It has been encouraging to hear from WT/GC/M/19 2 - 218 - the membership that while there are a number of issues to be discussed, the current consolidated text contains the basic elements that can lead us to consensus. I have also been pleased to hear recognition for the importance and cross cutting value of artisanal fishing for all. Regarding how to address the princip le of special and differential treatment, I would like to reiterate that Peru as a developing Member is aware of the need for the implementation of such treatment in this process. However, it is also aware that this implementation should not affect the amb ition and utility of any agreement we reach in the coming months. This balance will not be simple to achieve, and perhaps it will be the most complex task that we have ahead of us, but I am convinced that with the necessary flexibility we will be able to a ddress this challenge. Agriculture My delegation associates itself with the statement made by Ambassador Mina from Australia on behalf of the Cairns Group. I would also like to thank Ambassador Abraham for her report and her hard work in coordinating the negotiations. My delegation is aware of the gaps that still divide us in various aspects of the negotiations, but as a member of the Cairns Group, we believe that we must intensify our efforts to achieve concrete outcomes at the Ministeria l Conference this year, seeking to make progress of some kind on all three pillars of the negotiations . Regarding the domestic support pillar, Peru considers that the framework for negotiations put forward by some members of the Cairns Group contains the basic minimum elements for consensus on the subject. In this regard, we appreciate the recent incorporation of Lao PDR as a sponsor of the proposal and encourage other Members with similar interests to do the same. Electronic Commerce We support the wor k being done by the Informal Group. We believe that progress can be made in areas where there is a high degree of convergence, as demonstrated by the results of some small format working groups, and we support the commitment to intensify work to narrow the gaps in those areas where consensus has not yet been reached. Our delegation believes that achieving a high-level outcome on e -commerce is crucial for promoting economic development, advancing the digital transformation of our economy, increasing the part icipation of our companies in our countries and improving access to goods and services in the new digital economy. Micro, small and medium -sized enterprises (MSMEs) My delegation supports the work being done by the Informal Group, in particular the packa ge of statements adopted by the Group, which we hope will have the broad support of WTO Members. The COVID -19 pandemic has had a severe impact on all our countries, especially developing countries, not only in terms of human lives but also in terms of live lihoods and life projects. We are fully convinced that international trade represents a unique opportunity for our MSMEs to quickly resume their activities and contribute to the necessary economic recovery process, and that the WTO can make a significant c ontribution to facilitating these opportunities and making them viable. The Path to MC12 The return of the summer break will leave us in a race against time to achieve the deliverables that we consider feasible by the end of the year. Peru remains commit ted to all WTO negotiating processes, and considers that with increased efforts and commitment , together with flexibility , we will be able to achieve an agreement on fisheries subsidies, outcomes in agriculture and progress in restoring the Dispute Settlement Body. 56. Vanuatu (Pacific Group) I deliver this statement on behalf of the Pacific Group and we associate ourselves to the statements made by the ACP Group and the LDC Group. Our Group thanks the Chairs of the various negotiating groups for their reports and for their efforts in assisting Members to move the negotiations forward in preparation for MC12 in November. On fisheries subsidies, this remains a top priority for the Pacific Group. We commend the Chair of the Negotiating Group on Rules (NGR) for his continuing work and the release of a revised text on WT/GC/M/19 2 - 219 - 30 June. We also commend the Director -General and the Chair of the NGR for successfully convening the Ministerial TNC meeting on 15 July 2021. O ur Ministers stated that the draft text that was issued is a good basis for negotiations going forward. They have encouraged delegations to engage, negotiate and deliver an ou tcome before MC12. Our Ministers also recognized that there is much work to address the imbalances in the draft text which must focus on the disciplines on the reduction in harmful subsidies , and not discipline fisheries management. This agreement must not bring fisheries management under scrutiny and must not undermine the rights of Members, especially coastal states , under international agreements . Special and differential treatment is critical. We must deliver meaningful special and differential treatmen t for those that do not have yet sufficient capacity, especially for small island states that depend on fisheries. We note your reference, Director -General, to the technical assistance and capacity building concept and some of the understandings from the i nformal consultations held earlier this week. We commend your initiative for technical assistance and capacity building to establish a mechanism, and we look forward to further discussions on this. We note in your statement that this funding is not a subst itute for special and differential treatment . Notwithstanding, our priority is to complete the negotiations on the text so that we can be clear on our commitments before we frame the scope of the funding. Our view is that technical assistance and capacity building must not contemplate the WTO coming anywhere near a fisheries management system as we have consistently maintained. We note the timeframe being proposed for the completion of the fisheries subsidies agreement and we support this proposal. We will commit ourselves to that engagement. On development issues, the Pacific Group thanks the Chair for continuing to take this work forward , to deepen discussions on the ten G90 proposals. On services, we support intensified discussions to find solutions to the adverse economic impact of COVID -19 on Members' services sectors, especially for those most vulnerable and disproportionately affected due their dependence on one or two sectors. In terms of the services sector itself, we believe that many Members rec ognize the significant contribution of services to their economies , but the emphasis in the WTO is not yet there. We hope that a new focus on services be considered so that there is an outcome on this at MC12. We consider the work on the WTO's response to COVID -19 as a priority for MC12. We are already witnessing a third wave of infections of COVID -19 and new variants. This will continue to affect our economies, economic recovery and rebuilding. We need to work to prioritize our negotiations on elements of available WTO policy tools that can ensure equitable access to affordable vaccines and medical supplies , which are required to help us all to combat COVID -19. The Pacific Group looks forward to engaging in the various process, including the horizontal process established by the Chair of the General Council and led by Ambassador Walker to deliver an outcome. We reiterate our engagement to engaging constructively in negotiations and work towards concrete outcomes for MC12. 57. Thailand I have heard there are a number of differences here, but I am still not losing hope. Thailand has a number of issues that we believ e should be shown in the MC12 package. As I stated at the previous TNC meeting, the past (legacy issues such as fisheries subsid ies and agriculture), present (the WTO response to the pandemic), and future issues (WTO Reform) are still on the table, and we remain to adhere to this expectation. In the interest of time, I would like to highlight 3 issues that we consider are important to our future work: First, on the agriculture issue, while we support the transparency element and recent proposals, we are looking for an agriculture package for MC12 that includes Domestic Support. We are not yet ready to give up. We also appreciate the Chair of COA SS' statement that the draft text will be circulated next week, and we are willing to participate. As members of the Cairns Group, we will reach out and engage with other Members who have not been our like -minded in order to turn them into like -minded friends. Second, on fisheries subsid ies, I would like to show my thankfulness to Madame Chair and Ambassador Will for your tireless efforts and leadership in convening the Ministerial TNC Meeting. Thailand is strongly supportive on the Chairman 's current text. We agree with nearly 80% of the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 220 - text, and for the remaining 20%, we are preparing to engage with other Membe rs in order to reach a mutually agreed outcome. However, we do not want to see any new elements or issues introduced into the text at this stage, as we are talking about a 20 -year negotiation. If any new issues arise, we should work on them as part of a work program. We also can hear a lot of support in the Chair 's text, and we are looking forward to support ing the Chair to reach the possible landing zone. Third, the WTO response to the pandemic. This is an issue that is dear to our heart, and we cannot thank you enough for Madame Chair initiative on the WTO and WHO High Level Dialogue. Such a dialogue is really useful and informative, and I hope you will hold it again in the future to help Members gain a better understanding of the technical aspects. On the substance, based on the things that I heard from many consultations in many configurations, there is common ground that Members need to do as much as possible to accelerate access to vaccines and nobody in this room has disputed that. I heard from the WTO and WHO High Level Dialogue that there are a lot of trade related issues that the WTO can deal with in the future, but since we have a milestone at MC12, I am not confident that we can take up everything at this moment. However, this is the one are a that the WTO can engage positively with the world economy in the future. While we have to be more practical in finding outcomes that we can achieve at MC12, we can do more work program related to trade and health issue. Finally, all of the issues we nee d to work on in the future are text -based on the entire package by October at the latest. Otherwise, if the Ministerial TNC Meeting is held in a virtual format, the Ministers will be able to make statements but will not be able to engage in any meaningful discussion. Therefore, if we have virtual MC12, the text must first be agreed upon by Ambassadors in Geneva before being further presented to capital s. I am confident that Madame Chair and the distinguished Chairs of Negotiating Bodies will establish the text that will assist us in reaching a meaningful MC12 in November. 58. Uganda At the outset, my delegation aligns itself with the statements delivered by Mauritius, Chad and Jamaica on behalf of the Africa, LDC and ACP Groups. We thank you very much for your report. We thank the Chair of the General Council for his report and the Chairs of the negotiating groups for their reports. Madam Director -General, MC12 is months away now. While the format and other modalities are yet to be agreed upon, it can be agreed that it is critical that any outcome of MC12 is meaningful, not just to a few Members but to the entire membership. This means that those issues that are of common interest to all Members must be prioritized to allow us to make the most efficient use of our time. After close to four years since the last Ministerial Conference in 2017, the world is watching, much more than ever before, eagerly waiting for the contribution of the WTO in improving the livelihoods of its Members especially the developing and least developed among them. Addressing trade distorting domestic support , reinvigorating the 1998 Work Program on Electronic Commerce as mandated by our Ministers at various Ministerial meetings and reconsideration of the Moratorium on Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions , reviewing the provisions on special and different ial treatment in line with the existing Ministerial mandate , and ensuring effective market access under the LDCs services waiver, in pursuit of trade policy instruments that will promote industrialization for structural transformation , remain our prioritie s. Indeed, reform of the WTO for us encompasses addressing many of these longstanding issues. Madam Director -General, it is almost impossible to imagine moving forward on these and other important issues when the COVID -19 pandemic is still raging on , bringing about new challenges every day. It is important that the WTO is seen to deliver and indeed delivers a solution or solutions to help in overcoming the pandemic and recovering from its impact. We applaud the progress in the WT/GC/M/19 2 - 221 - facilitator -led process in t his regard and stand ready to work with all Members to achieve a meaningful result. Finally, Madam Director -General, we very much welcome the work being done in fisheries subsidies negotiations in pursuit of SDG 14.6. In the same vein, because it is of c ritical importance to us, we invite Members to exhibit the same level of ambition in completing the Doha Round pursuant to SDG target 17.10 , as one of the key means of implementation of the Agenda 2030. 59. Cameroon Cameroon associates itself with the statem ents delivered by Mauritius on behalf of the African Group and Jamaica on behalf of the ACP Group . From the outset, we congratulate you on the quality of the organi zation of the TNC meeting of 15 July on fisheries subsidies and reiterate our constructive commitment to making the 12th Ministerial Conference a success. Madam Chairperson, you have highlighted the considerable differences between the Members on the issue of fisheries subsidies negotiations and indicated the interest of all Members in showing flexibility if we are to reach a fair and equitable agreement at the 12th Ministerial Conference. As so well-elaborated by you, the outcome of the said negotiations will have to duly respond to the mandate which calls for: prohibiting certain subsidies that contribute to overcapacity and overfishing , eliminating subsidies to IUU fishing , and granting special and differential treatment that takes into account the development needs of countries. Be assured that Cameroon will work with all Members towards a text that effectively prohibits harmful subsidies, ensures effective sanctions against operators engaged in illegal fishing and takes into account the development needs of developing countries, as well as the polluter -pays principle that governe d any sustainability instrument. Artisanal fisheries cannot be held responsible for the much -maligned actions of industrial fisheries, on which the instrument should focus. The outcome of these talks will largely depend on the willingness of subsidising Members to reduce their subsidies. We welcome your efforts to establish a trust fund and your willingness to take into account the remarks made by Members in the establishment and operation of this fund. With regard to agriculture, we welcome the concrete proposals made by the African Group , which are a solid basis for concluding discussions on domestic support measures, sanitary and phytosanitary rules and the holding of public stocks. It would be desirable to see the same drive to reach a minimum agreemen t in the area of agriculture as observed on another subject. Our populations have been waiting for concrete answers on agriculture for a very long time and the relevance of this organization at MC12 will be judged by its capacity to respond to these expect ations. Though we commend the efforts of Members in moving forward negotiations on agriculture, it may be wise not to limit our ambitions to the adoption of a work programme whose outcome remains uncertain. Concerning the response to the COVID -19 pandemic , we reiterate our appreciation for the decision of the President of the General Council, Ambassador C astillo , who has appointed Ambassador Walker to coordinate this action and renew our support for them. The WTO cannot remain silent at a time when humanit y is facing a pandemic with multifaceted consequences. The waiver of certain rules on intellectual property rights, the limitation of export restrictions, and the support for financing small and medium -sized enterprises proposed by Côte d'Ivoire, are all n ecessary measures from which we will gain by giving our approval. This is why we welcome the textual discussions on the various related proposals and intend to work with all Members to bring them to a rapid conclusion. Finally, speaking of development, Ca meroon draws the attention of all to the fact that any reflection on the future and the reform of this organi zation cannot be without an effective special and differential treatment. For this reason, we remain attentive to the discussions underway in the Committee on Trade and Development in Special Session , and share the concerns of the Chairman of this Committee, Ambassador K adra, who invite d the Members to truly listen to the proposals of the G90 and to show a constructive commitment. We are open to any new approach that allows developing countries to meet their development needs and address systemic inequalities. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 222 - ANNEX 3 STATEMENT S JAMAICA (ACP GROUP) AND CHAD (LDC GROUP) AT THE E-COMMERCE STRUCTURED DISCUSSIONS HELD ON 5 JULY 2021 Following the requests of Jamaica and Chad under item 6 , the statement s made by Jamaica on behalf of the ACP Group and by Chad on behalf of the LDC Group at the Structured Discussions on E-Commerce held on 5 July 2021, are included below as part of th e Minutes of the General Council meeting. 1. Jamaica (ACP Group) On behalf of the ACP Group, as many would be aware, we have been solid supporters of reinvigorating the exploratory discussions elaborated in the 1998 Work Programme on Electronic Commerce and have been consistent in the General Council meeting in not only supporting structured discussions, but also by requesting that such discussions cover all issues within the scope of the Work Programme. In addition to the question of customs duties and electronic transmissions, other issues raised in the Work Programme should also be discussed within the structured discussions, including data localization, data flows, source code, and other issues pertinent to the digital divide that hinder the full par ticipation of ACP countries. These discussions would encompass goods ordered online and delivered physically as well as goods and services ordered and delivered online. Issues regarding infrastructure also need to be discussed. Deliberations under the Wor k Programme should explore solutions that support the inherent needs of all the WTO Members, particularly those amongst us that need to be enabled if we are to advance in closing the digital divide. The Group is aware that some Members are seeking to defin e electronic transmissions in the JSI plurilateral negotiations. While such a definition may appear to be a negotiated position, we are cognizant that over time a lot of debates would have taken place in the name of the E -commerce Work Programme in both th e Council for Trade in Goods and the Council for Trade in Services. Setting aside the divergences in views on whether electronic transmissions are a good or a service. We are interested in a clear and concrete review of some of the positions put forward by South Africa and India, for example, and other Members in a manner that helps us resolve this issue before MC12. We must keep in mind that there are revenue loss concerns, as well as the impact on consumers in developing countries, who would bear the co st of tariff. The same considerations will also be necessary for internal taxes, and the resolution on the issue of electronic transmission. We need not only take into account the present situation and activities of our economies, but also the future of wh at digital goods and contents will realistically become for all countries, as well as the level of technology that would ensure a level playing field, as the digital divide begins to close. 2. Chad (LDC Group) E-Commerce: Challenges and opportunities I take the floor on behalf of the LDC Group. Thank you for organizing this discussion on a very topical issue, which is the relevance of electronic commerce in the present and the challenges and opportunities that go along. Chair, as you may recall the LDC Group submitted a communication in November 2019 (WT/GC/W/787) highlighting a number of obstacles, barriers and challenges that impede electronic commerce from flourishing in our economies. We can highlight for instance lack of affordable ICT infrastructur e; limited use electronic payments; weak regulatory frameworks, and lack of digital skills among enterprises. According to ITU indicators for 2019, only 25% of LDC urban areas have internet connectivity in the home and 35 % using the internet overall, in cluding mobile telephony. In contrast, only 10% connectivity at home in rural areas, with 19 % use of the internet overall, including mobile telephony. These figures are in stark contrast with those of developed countries and many developing countries. Internet connectivity is part of the bedrock of e -commerce -based infrastructure, without which we WT/GC/M/19 2 - 223 - cannot have e -commerce. Following the outbreak of the pandemic, the electronic commerce wave provided a significant lift to established players, such as platform s and third -party marketplaces, while traditional bricks and mortar companies seeking to sell online did not achieve the same success. This reflects the challenge in adapting business models in the short term related to operational costs, supply chain, reg ulatory approvals. On the consumer side, habits and trust represent the other side of the coin to enable e -commerce to develop. Here we note that a change of mindset cannot occur overnight, even in a particular context such as the pandemic. For instance, preference for cash on delivery represents one aspect of a lack of trust in online payment solutions. More fundamentally, lack of internet remains a critical hurdle for a successful increase in electronic commerce for LDCs. Towards the end of last year 2020, UNCTAD reported that only 19% of people in LDCs used the internet, in contrast this figure stood at 87% in developed countries. This is a challenge, which could not be addressed or be tackled in the two decades of the E -commerce Work Programme. Moreover, LDCs require ass istance in building the necessary infrastructure for the internet to take root and spread. There may be signs that such an endeavour could be achieved faster than we could have imagined. Indeed, one clear principle in the field of information communication technology is that progress is not linear as shown by Moore's law and the power of ever faster processors. Recently, the founder of SpaceX, announced the launching of Starlink, an internet broadband service capable of covering all corners of the world, ex cluding the polar region. This would seem like science fiction for LDCs, yet it is not. It is the present future of our world. Yet we all must be included. Certainly, on the infrastructural side, public -private partnership type initiatives can be more co st- effective given the high and if not prohibitive cost of the initial expenditure needed to build an internet network from scratch. Where governments can play a more active role is on the regulatory side, by for instance promoting an electronic commerce s trategic framework. A national and regional strategy can streamline initiatives across different sectors, enable best practice sharing and contribute towards achieving scale. This can pertain, for instance, to data and data protection. With a clear sense o f the rules around data protection, confidence can be increased among consumers and businesses on how, for instance, privacy is protected. This of course requires technological assistance and also adaptation to the realities of each country. A strategic ou tlook must also look into the issue of fees and taxes. We note that a certain number of countries such as Canada and Australia are pioneering systems to considerably simplify collection of taxes on MSMEs and cross border trade carried out online. We can de finitely take inspiration from such initiatives to support cross border digital trade, and in particular that of our own enterprises, which by our nature of LDCs are all MSMEs. We would be keen to learn more how the systems put in place by these pioneers c an support enterprises from LDCs and women entrepreneurs, to tap into new opportunities and facilitate their exports. With regard to skills, the pandemic brought to light the power of online learning and education. Innovative learning tools could be adap ted to the needs of entrepreneurs and aspiring start -ups to acquire the knowhow in running an online business. Given that language can constitute a barrier, adapting existing learning manuals and guides to e -commerce by universities, trade associations and professional bodies into languages of LDCs, could render the knowledge and information more accessible. The pandemic has forced us all to rethink how businesses operate including sectors that can be regarded as viable, as fast growing and rapidly evolvi ng, electronic commerce has gradually come to make inroads in countless sectors. From music, books to news and movies, we see that even content can be digitalized raising concerns about revenue loss from customs. More fundamentally, this raises the questio n of what sort of business models can thrive in such an environment? This is a significant challenge, but at the same time we are presented with a unique opportunity that must be seized to support the growth of our businesses and in particular MSMEs. To be able to assist in this, we must adopt an empirical approach, mindful not to simply replicate what has already been done elsewhere, since each country has unique assets and comparative advantage. Carrying out needs assessments at country level can suppor t better understanding where to begin in rolling out a strategic electronic commerce reform programme. Such assessments in LDCs need financial assistance. So, we also reach out to our trading partners to support us in this regard. To conclude Chair, unlike previous waves of globalization that mainly lifted the large boats, electronic commerce WT/GC/M/19 2 - 224 - can support smaller boats, benefit from the rising tide. For this, we still need to fulfil certain prerequisites as has already been touched upon such as greater inter net access, upgrading skills, a coherent regulatory framework and an integrated financial and logistics system to name a few. These are all relevant to the development dimension underlying the electronic work programme, which form an integral part of the d iscussions. We are hopeful that these issues will receive the adequate attention. _______________ WT/GC/M/19 2 - 225 - ANNEX 4 STATEMENTS AT THE INFORMAL MEETING OF THE GENERAL COUNCIL ON 2 8 JULY 2021 Statement by the General Council Chair at the 2 8 July Informal General Council Meeting Opening Statement Good morning and welcome to this informal meeting of the General Council. Thank you for attending at such short notice. I have convened this urgent meeting to discuss the matter of the appointment of officers of subsidiary bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods. As you know, this matter is included in the agenda of our meeting – that is Item 2 2. Before I begin my statement on this issue, I would kindly ask the CTG Chair, Ambassador Purevsuren of Mongolia, to report in this informal setting on the CTG consideration of this matter. [The Chairman of the Goods Council provides his report .] Thank you very much, and I would like to place on record my sincere appreciation to the CTG Chair for his tireless efforts and engagement on this issue. Let me recall at this point that, on my part I held consultations regarding this matter, further to the call made to me as GC Chair. I met with group coordinators on 28 June and 1 July, and I then sent a commu nication to all delegations on 2 July in which I attached a proposed slate of names that was emerging from the consultations, together with two additional understandings. It was then brought to my attention that additional time was needed for some further consultations due to concerns expressed on the process. At the Informal Meeting of the General Council on 22 July, I provided a brief update and noted that unfortunately a solution had still not been found. As the Goods Council Chair has just noted, the CTG meeting reconvened on 26 July and resumed the item on the appointment of officers, but regrettably the impasse could not be overcome. Yesterday, the Director -General and I called for a meeting with group coordinators and some delegations. At that me eting, the Director -General and I emphasized our deep concern about the systemic and institutional repercussions that this continuing stalemate bears for the Organization. I think it is fair to say that we had a frank exchange of views on this matter. I think it is also to be noted that strong concerns on the overall process on the appointment of Chairs were reiterated. In this context, I heard repeated calls for reforming the overall exercise. Specifically, I took note of the call for increased transparen cy in the appointment process, and of the need to avoid the miscommunication at different levels and unnecessary confusion that have occurred. As General Council Chair, it is my strong view that every effort should be made to avoid such situation in the f uture. It is with this in mind that I am instructing the Chairs of the Goods Council and of the Services Council to immediately begin consultations on the overall process of appointment of officers in the respective subsidiary bodies so that the process can be reformed, and that this situation does not arise again. I would also ask the Chairs to report on their consultations at the next General Council meeting. At this moment, and on this basis, I appeal to your sense of shared responsibility in givin g positive consideration to the slate that I attached to my communication convening this Informal General Council meeting. I very much hope that we can formally agree on it under Item 22. Let me stress that this is an exceptional situation, that called fo r an unusual/exceptional response. Let us all ensure that this does not happen again in the future. This slate comes with the additional understanding that the CTG and CTS Chairs will undertake consultations on the overall exercise on the appointment of officers to avoid a repeat of such a situation in the future. Closing Statement Given our discussion today, I will make a proposal to the delegations once we resume in Formal Mode. The proposal would be for the General Council to take note of the consensus on the proposed slate of names for the appointment of officers to the subsidiary bodies of the Goods Council, as attached to the convening notice sent to all delegations on 27 July with the understanding that I, as WT/GC/M/19 2 - 226 - Chair of the General Council, would unde rtake consultations on the overall exercise on the appointment of officers to avoid a repeat of such a situation in the future. If this is agreeable, we can move forward. Statement by the Goods Council Chairman at the 2 8 July Informal General Council Mee ting The exercise on the Appointment of Chairs to the subsidiary bodies of the Council on Trade in Goods is the cornerstone of the functioning of a large number of regular bodies at the WTO. Although the Guidelines for Appointment of Officers of WTO bodie s in document WT/L/510 expressly states that Members should regard the appointment exercise as a relatively routine level and housekeeping function, the truth is that Members do not seem to see the election in this way and as a result , it has been increasi ngly difficult to conclude this routine function. My predecessor , Ambassador Mikael Anzén (Sweden ), launched the process at the CTG level immediately after the new General Council Chairperson was elected in February of this year. Despite a large number o f consultations with the regional group coordinators, Members were not able to agree on the slate of names for the Formal CTG meeting o n 31 March and 1 April. As a result, the CTG agreed to suspend agenda item 3 concerning the appointment of officers to th e subsidiary bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods to allow the outgoing Chairperson, Ambassador Anzén, to continue his consultations on the slate of names of the Chairpersons of the subsidiary bodies. On 23 June, Ambassador Anzén sent a communication to the regional group coordinators indicating that despite numerous meetings and consultations it had not been possible to reach agreement on a slate of names and that two group coordinators have recommende d that he request the Chairperson of the General Council, Ambassador Dacio Castillo (Honduras ), to seek a solution to the current impasse. Ambassador Anzén had made the request and Ambassador Castillo ha d accepted to oversee the process. On 2 July, after the consultation with the regional group coordinators, Ambassador Castillo sent the communication informing Members that the group coordinators had reached an agreement and transmitted to agree the slate of names to their Members for their consideration. As part of Ambassador Castillo 's consultations, a future understanding was reached, namely that the CTG and the CTS Chairs would undertake as soon as possible consultations on the overall exercise on the appointment of officers to avoid a repeat of such a situation in the future. He noted that there was an additional understanding regarding the allocation of the Chairpersonships for 2022 and he would inform accordingly the succeeding General Council Chair. Finally, Ambassador Castillo noted that it has been an extremely difficult process and the proposed slate has reflected a very delicate balance. For this reason, he has requested Members' collaboration and utmost flexibility for adopting the slate and allowing the 14 subsidiary bodies to continue operating normally in the coming months. On 7 July, Ambassador Castillo sent a second communication noting that it has been brought to his attention that additional time was needed for some future consultations and that, as a result, the issue of the appointment of officers would remain suspended to allow those future consultations to take place. In addition, he indicated that it would be resumed at the appropriate moment by the CTG Chair. On 14 July, Ambassador Castillo held another meeting of the group coordinat ors, but agreement was still not possible. At the same evening, I convened an Informal CTG meeting with the objective of reporting on the situation. I did not make a report, but instead noted that it had come to my attention that future consultations were needed. I followed up with additional consultations with the group coordinators on 22 and 26 July and unfortunately consensus was still not possible. In a communication dated 23 July, I also informed the Membership that the EU Member States ' nominee to Chair the Committee on TRIMs, Mr . Tamás Vattai (Hungary ), was in the process of moving and would no longer be available to Chair the Committee for which he had been nominated. As a consequence, EU Member States nominee to Chair the Committee on TRIMs is now Ms . Vilma Peltonen (Finland ). On Monday, 26 July, two days ago , I convened an Informal CTG meeting to report on the situation including the fact that no consensus was possible on the slate of names. A number of Members took the floor to exp ress their disappointment that a solution had not been found and they voiced their systemic concerns about the blockage in this routine exercise. The formal meeting of the CTG, which had been suspended on the subject, namely agenda item 3, since 31 March a nd 1 April was WT/GC/M/19 2 - 227 - reconvened immediately afterwards . It was agreed that my report as well as the statement of the Members who so wished would be recorded in the minutes. The Council for Trade in Goods agreed to conclude agenda item 3 and took note that I woul d make a report to the General Council. It is quite distressing and a sad reflection of what seems to be a systemic inability of this organization to agree on anything. Five months after a housekeeping procedure was launched and after multiple efforts by many, including the Chairperson of the General Council, consensus remained elusive and Members have yet to agree on the slate of names of the 14 CTG subsidiary bodies. Furthermore, it is an unprecedented situation . This is the first time that Members have been unable to agree on a slate of names at the CTG level and that has come to the General Council for resolution. I cannot overemphasize the importance of finalizing this task. To my knowledge, there are already two subsidiary bodies that lack a Chairp erson . We run the high risk of facing serious organizational problems with regular committee s being placed under such a situation if this is not sorted out immediately. In addition, I would like to remind Members that the continued lack of agreement will b ring serious repercussions to the organization during a Ministerial year. I urge Members not to underestimate the negative impact that this may have on the WTO. For this reason, I call all Members to exercise maximum flexibility and urge them to continue e ngaging with the view to solving this issue as soon as possible. I will be requesting the Secretariat to record this statement as my report on the agenda item 22 in the minutes of the meeting. _______________ At their request, the statements by India on the 2 8 July Informal General Council Meeting and by Thailand on the Appointment of Officers to the Subsidiary Bodies of the Council for Trade in Goods – Report by the Chair of the Council for Trade in Goods (Agenda Item 22) are incorporated in the minutes of this meeting. _______________ Statement by India at the 2 8 July Informal General Council Meeting For the purpose of transparency , let me be very clear that it is India which has faced this problem of mistrust, lack of communication or misinformation. Therefore, it is my duty to explain to the Membership what has happened because most of the Membership were are n ot part of these deliberations during at least last one month. At the CTG meeting on 26 July , an attempt was made by some Mem bers from a particular group to portray that India's position on the issue was aimed at targeting a particular Member that is Mexico and the GRULAC Group. Nothing can be far from the truth than that . We have been clear an d unequivocal throughout this proce ss that our concern is on systemic issues with respect to appointment of Chairs for WTO bodies in this organization not only for subsidiary bodies but also for the regular bod ies. Therefore, we completely reject the statements made by some Members of the GRULAC delegations and Member of the Mexican delegation at the CTG meeting on 26 July. If our objection is to Mexico or GRULAC as it was portrayed on 26 July then India could have objected to Mexico becoming CTS Chair this yea r and also could have objecte d to the GRULAC Chair s of TBT and SPS in the earlier years. Members may note that GRULAC has held the TBT Chairmanship twice since 2015 and the SPS Committee four times since 2015. Incidentally , one of our good friend s from Costa Rica, Ambassador Gloria Abraham Peralta , is the sitting CoA SS Chair . So, this notion of trying to create that India is against GRULAC Members is very unfortunate. As the CTG Chair has said, for India , the Chairmanship of these Committees is a housekeeping issue whereas for some delegations it is due to pressure from their capital and unfortunately pressure from private business interests . They have stated this on several occasions. Therefore, it is clear who is taking it as housekeeping job and who is taking it as some other thin g – trying to use every tool and pressure possible to get the Chairmanship of TBT. This is most unfortunate during this entire process which most of the Members are not aware of, and if they are aware of , I will plea to them to please come out and speak th e truth. We politely request colleagues in the Mexican WT/GC/M/19 2 - 228 - delegation to stop this misinformation campaign and also appeal to our friends from GRULAC not to fall into this trap or campaign being led by some individuals. Narrating a story a hundred times will not make it become a fact . India has good, cordial and friendly relationship with both Mexico and the GRULAC region, and an attempt by some individuals to portray it otherwise does not benefit neither them nor the countries they represent. The recent exam ples during COVID pandemic which had shown how we have helped each other is one more example contrary to the narrative being built in the CTG and in the WTO. Few individuals are trying to portray their leadership in Geneva showing Geneva highlights and coming on the way of bilateral relationships of Members . These are highly deplorable. So called "Friends of the System" should guide correctly people who are being basically misled and misguided . People who are talking about transparency should be more transparent in their narrative and behaviour. For us , the concern is not one Member . Our issue is with the process. Let me illustrate the procedural fallacy we have encountered during this process and bringing that out to the large Membership is the sole purpose of our position on this matter. Nothing that I am not going to say will be new to the GC Chair, the CTG Chair, the former CTG Chair, and incidentally the CTG Chair who is my coordinator. This is for dissemination to the larger Membership . In March 2021, the outgoing CTG Chair had clearly communicated to the GC Chair at that time that he has not been able to finali ze the names for the two subsidiary bodies because of objections from India and one another Member. However, during the consultation that you undertook to finali ze the slate , you were not informed of our objection and you w ere given that only the Committee on Agriculture was left to be finali zed and this reinforced what the CTG Chair has just now stated that the former CTG Chair has communicated to you that two coordinators approached you, that means out of four , two coordin ators approached you to resolve that issue which was on the C ommittee on Agriculture involving developing countries and GRULAC. This was a clear failure of the process and if I may use the strong word – hiding information to the judge while asking the judg e to deliver justice in this matter. The entire process was conducted by regional coordinators , and our regional coordinator was aware of our objection . But it is unfortunate that they have not relate d them in that meeting and I would be hoping that the regional coordinator will at least enlighten other Members on the reason for not think ing that India has not withdrawn from this. It has also been mentioned that there was a gentlem en's agreement last year on the TBT Chairman ship for Mexico this year and t hat should be honoured. It seems that this gentlem en's agreement has only taken place between the outgoing CTG Chair, incidentally he was from GRULAC, and Mexico or at least known only to them and not to other regional coordinators. My request here would b e that if it is known to any regional coordinator who are present here representing other groups to please come out with the truth if they are aware of this . India, which I have narrated before, the Director -General and the GC Chair as well as regional coordinators, India will take it as new facts on the table and move on, but hiding that information and spreading that there was a gentlemen 's agreement, if we had known this , they could have informed us right at the beginning of the process and we would not have wasted what they are saying we have wasted five months or seven months, in the beginning itself we would not have wasted this time that if regional coordinators would have said that yes this deal was done last year and TBT is not on offer for any Membership except Mexico then we would have moved on and we would have withdrawn our candidature . This lack of communication has created this impasse for seven months. Due to this lack of transparency on the part of everyone i nvolved, that is the regional coordinators, the Chair of the concerned bodies , we have landed in the situation. Our primary concern here is the lack of a transparent system . Many Members have been in the receiving end of this non -transparent process and it has continued for many years . I am new to the system so I checked the record s. Last year, we also had the same thing . The slate , I was told , was cleared just before the summer break . So it is not a new thing for this organization to ponder . Everyone has bilaterally talk ed about the system but they have not tried sincerely to solve this impasse for future years. And there is a reason for that, because it is said it helps interests of very few here – interests of some who conveniently fix Chairs at these bod ies for their convenience and I am using strong words here because we have seen this process now for six months very closely and we have seen how people talk to each other and try to communicate misinformation. It is because of this that we see some indi viduals repeatedly taking Chairmanship of one or another Committee year after year or what is called " committee shopping" . Some of them are senior WT/GC/M/19 2 - 229 - colleagues . This w ould have encourage d younger colleagues for Chairmanship s and mentor them . Unfortunately , we do not see that happening in the WTO. Similarly, we also see this practice of Chairmanships being exchanged and traded for future years . Side deals and so -called gentlemen 's agreement even when there are no established rules of procedures for doing so . What we call as future trading and, in this case, it was short selling of chairmanship because the 2020 chairmanship for TBT was not up for developing countries, it was a slot for developed countries. Therefore, the re was the candidate from Russia which then went to Australia – so this argument of Mexico that it was their turn in 2020 and they have been given this comfort to get it in 2021, in an equity market it is called short selling, which is not there, and you are selling it. Any other regulato r would have intervened in this process . Unfortunately , in this case the regulator became party to that. Other Ombudsman in the form of reginal coordinators kept quiet in this entire episode. Because of these non -transparent practices , when they want to deny someone , all arguments and logic are used including the principles of rotation and balance – yet we know th at the system of rotation is hardly being followed when you look at any Committee nor the principle of balance. Similarly, on the question of ba lance or representation, one Member taking two chairmanship s – one is CTS and now in TBT, I do not know whether this is the true representation or wider representation . When they want to accommodate someone , suddenly some gentlemen 's agreement which no one knows surfaces. And does this practice give us any sense of pride in an organization which talks about rules -based and transparency? So Chair, to conclude , our concern is systemic . Therefore , at the formal General Council meeting today during the discus sion on Agenda Item 22, if there is going to be an acknowledgement of the lack of transparency and miscommunication expanding on what you have now reported in the process which has led to this impasse this year, and if the GC Chair can assure Members that you will undertake a comprehensive overhaul of the selection process for appointment of Chairs for WTO bodies not leaving it to the CTG and CTS Chair s, both for regular and subsidiary bodies, as contained in the document WT/L/510 – we would consider accept ing the slate of names proposed . Let me make it clear that we are not here to secure Chairmanship of any Committee for this year nor seek any guarantee for subsequent years. At the end , I humbly reject the option or offer given to us in informal meetings or deliberation s to have the TBT Chair manship for the 2022 slate, as we do not believe in Chair shopping, future trading and sub selling of Chairs. Certainly, I would like to thank Members who have offered us. Statement by Thailand on Agenda Item 22 Thailand is glad that we were able to conclude this agenda and we would like to thank all the Members concerned for their great flexibility. We are confident that with your great experience and your impartiality, as well as your capability, you will hold a consultation that will make everyone happy on this issue in the future. We are now close to MC12. Therefore, we should focus the discussion on substance rather than procedural issues. We look forward to working closely and positively with everyone in the future. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_INF_TESSD_W6.pdf

s_INF_TESSD_W6

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN20_URY37.pdf

r_G_TBTN20_URY37

G/TBT/N/URY/37 27 juillet 2020 (20-5175) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: espagnol NOTIFICATION La notification suivante est communiquée conformément à l'article 10.6. 1. Membre notifiant : URUGUAY Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés (articles 3.2 et 7.2): 2. Organisme responsable: Dirección Nacional de Industrias (Direction nationale de l'industrie) Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Minería (Ministère de l'industrie, de l'énergie et des mines) Sarandí 620 - Montevideo consultas.publicas@m iem.gub.uy Téléphone : +598 2840 1234 int. 2166 Les nom et adresse (y compris les numéros de téléphone et de fax et les adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant) de l'organisme ou de l'autorité désigné pour s'occuper des observations concernant la notification doivent être indiqués si cet organisme ou cette autorité est différent de l'organisme susmentionné: Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Minería (Ministère de l'industrie, de l'énergie et des mines) Sarandí 620 - Monte video rrii@miem.gub.uy 3. Notification au titre de l'article 2.9.2 [X], 2.10.1 [ ], 5.6.2 [ ], 5.7.1 [ ], autres: 4. Produits visés (le cas échéant, position du SH ou de la NCCD, sinon position du tarif douanier national . Les numéros de l'ICS peuvent aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Riz décortiqué et riz poli ; Riz (SH 1006) 5. Intitulé, nombre de pages et langue(s) du texte notifié : Proyecto de Resolución GMC Nº 20/19 - "Límites Máximos de Contamina ntes Inorgánicos en Alimentos (Modificación de la Resolución GMC N° 12/11)" (Projet de décision GMC n° 20/19 - "Limites maximales de contaminants inorganiques dans les aliments (Modification de la décision GMC n° 12/11)"), 2 pages, en espagnol 6. Teneur : Le texte notifié porte modification de la Décision (Resolución) GMC n° 12/11 - "Règlement technique Mercosur relatif aux limites maximales de contaminants inorganiques dans les aliments", en actualisant les limites maximales d'arsenic présent dans le riz d e sorte à les aligner sur les dispositions du Codex Alimentarius. 7. Objectif et justification, y compris la nature des problèmes urgents, le cas échéant : Protection de la santé ou de la sécurité des personnes ; Harmonisation 8. Documents pertinents : Sans objet 9. Date projetée pour l'adoption : À déterminer G/TBT/N/URY/37 - 2 - Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur : À déterminer 10. Date limite pour la présentation des observations : 60 jours à compter de la notification 11. Entité auprès de laquelle les tex tes peuvent être obtenus : point d'information national [ ] ou adresse, numéros de téléphone et de fax et adresses de courrier électronique et de site Web, le cas échéant, d'un autre organisme: https://www.gub.uy/ministerio -industria -energia - mineria/comunicacion/noticias/consulta -publica -sobre -reglamentos -tecnicos -mercosur - rtms https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/TBT/URY/20_4520_00_s.pdf

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_IP_N_1GBR118.pdf

q_IP_N_1GBR118

IP/N/1/GBR/118, IP/N/1/GBR/C/30 IP/N/1/GBR/T/55, IP/N/1/GBR/E/12 12 February 2021 (21-1199) Page: 1/2 Council for Trade -Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Original: English NOTIFICATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT UNITED KINGDOM : COPYRIGHT, ETC AND TRADE MARKS (OFFENCES AND ENFORCEMENT) ACT 2002 Notifying Member UNITED KINGDOM Details of the notified legal text Title Copyright, etc and Trade Marks (Offences and Enforcement) Act 2002 Subject matter Copyright and related rights; Trademarks; Enforcement Nature of notification [X] Main dedicated intellectual property law or regulation [ ] Other law or regulation Link to legal text* https://ip -documents.info/2021/IP/GBR/21_1078_00_e.pdf Notification status [ ] First notification [X] Amendment or revision to notified legal text [ ] Replacement or consolidation of notified legal text(s) Previous notification(s) referred to IP/N/1/GBR/T/1 ; IP/N/1/GBR/C/1 Brief description of the notified legal text The Act amends provisions in copyright law in respect of criminal offences, search warrants, powers of seizure and order for forfeiture. It also amends the Trade Marks Act 1994 with regard to search warrants and powers of seizure. The Act also implements the Copyright in the Information Society Directive 2001/2 9/EC. The Act amends the criminal provisions in intellectual proper ty law, relating to copyright, rights in performances, fraudulent reception of conditional access transmissions by use of unauthori zed decoders and trademarks. The Act brings about some rationali zation of these criminal provisions by removing some of the d ifferences. The three areas in which rationali zation is provided are maximum penalties for certain offences in intellectual property law, police search and seizure powers relating to offences and court orders on forfeiture of illegal material that may have been seized during investigation of offences. The Act does not make any changes to the scope of criminal offences in intellectual property law so that the type of behaviour that can give rise to an offence remains the same. Language(s) of notified legal text English Entry into force 24 July 2002 IP/N/1/GBR/118 • IP/N/1/GBR/C/30 • IP/N/1/GBR/T/55 • IP/N/1/GBR/E/12 - 2 - Other date Notification details Submission date of notification 11 February 2021 Other information https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/25/contents Agency or authority responsible UK Intellectual Property Office Concept House Cardiff Road Newport South Wales NP10 8QQ United Kin gdom information@ipo.gov.uk 0300 300 2000 Outside the UK: +44 (0)1633 814000 * Links are provided to texts of laws and regulations notified under the TRIPS Agreement in the form supplied by the Member concerned; the WTO Secretariat does not endorse or revise their content.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NARE257.pdf

r_G_SPS_NARE257

G/SPS/N/ARE/257 23 août 2022 (22-6357) Page: 1/3 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION DE MESURES D'URGENCE 1. Membre notifiant : ÉMIRATS ARABES UNIS Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés: 2. Organisme responsable : Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (Ministère du changement climatique et de l'environnement) 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figurant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC . Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Singes, ro ngeurs et primates non humains 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable: [ ] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [X] Régions ou pays spécifiques : Pays d'Afrique de l'Ouest où cette maladie est présente à l'état endémique et dans les pays voisins et les pays liés entre eux (Bénin ; Cameroun ; République centrafricaine ; Congo; Côte d'Ivoire; R épublique démocratique du Congo ; Gabon; Ghana; Libéria ; Nigéria ; Sierra Leone ; et Soudan du Sud) 5. Intitulé du texte notifié : United Arab Emirates Imposing a temporary ban on the importation of monkey, rodents and non -human primates from West African countries where the disease is endemic and neighboring and inter -related countries (Mise en place par les Émirats arabes u nis d'une interdiction temporaire de l'importation de singes, rongeurs et primates non humains en provenance de s pays d'Afrique de l'Ouest où cette maladie est présente à l'état endémique et dans les pays voisins et les pays liés entre eux) Langue(s) : anglais. Nombre de pages : 2 6. Teneur : Il ressort de rapports établis par l'Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (WOAH) qu'un foyer de variole du singe est apparu dans des pays africains . Afin de prévenir l'entrée de cette maladie sur son territoire, les Émirats arabes unis appliquent une mesure sanitaire de précaution destinée à prévenir le risque d'introduction de la variole du singe. La mesure prévoit: 1. L'interdiction temporaire de l'importation de primates non humains et de rongeurs en provenance des pays d'Afrique de l'Ouest où cette maladie est présente à l'état endémique et des pays voisins et pays liés entre eux (Bénin, Cameroun, République centrafri caine, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire , République démocratique du Congo, Gabon, Ghana, Libéria, Nigéria, Sierra Leone, et Soudan du Sud); 2. La poursuite de la procédure en vigueur de mise à l'isolement des animaux (primates non humains) pour une période de 30 jours, ainsi qu'un examen de détection de la variole du singe pour les envois de primates importés dans le pays conformément aux formulaires des certificats figurant dans l'annexe de la Décision ministérielle n° 335 de 2018. G/SPS/N/ARE/257 - 2 - 7. Objectif et raison d'être : [ ] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [X] santé des animaux, [ ] préservation des végétaux, [X] protection des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [ ] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à d es parasites. 8. Nature du (des) problème(s) urgent(s) et raison pour laquelle la mesure d'urgence est prise : La présence dans les pays africains d'un foyer de variole du singe a été signalée au moyen d'une annonce officielle de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (WOAH). 9. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente ? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle: [ ] Commission du Codex Alimentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : [X] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE) (par exemple, numéro de chapitre du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux aquatiques) : Variole du singe [ ] Convention internationale pour la protect ion des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP) : [ ] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme internationale pertinente? [X] Oui [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internationale: 10. Autres documents pertinents et langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2 022/SPS/ARE/22_5720_00_e.pdf 11. Date d'entrée en vigueur ( jj/mm/aa )/période d'application (le cas échéant) : 10 août 2 022 [ ] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Organisme ou autorité désigné pour traiter les observations : [X] autorité nationale respo nsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (Ministère du changement climatique et de l'environnement) SPS Notification and Inquiry Point (Point de contact chargé des notifications SPS/point d'information SPS) Émirats arabes unis Courrier électronique: uaesps@moccae.gov.ae G/SPS/N/ARE/257 - 3 - 13. Texte(s) disponible(s) auprès de : [X] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (Ministère du changement climatique et de l'environnement) SPS Notification and Inquiry Point (Point de contact chargé des notifications SPS/point d'information SPS) Émirats arabes unis Courrier électronique: uaesps@moccae.gov.ae

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NSAU459.pdf

r_G_SPS_NSAU459

G/SPS/N/SAU/459 16 mars 2022 (22-2305) Page: 1/2 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION DE MESURES D'URGENCE 1. Membre notifiant : ROYAUME D'ARABIE SAOUDITE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés: 2. Organisme responsable : Saudi Food and Drug Authority - SFDA (Autorité saoudienne des produits alimentaires et pharmaceutiques) 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figurant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC . Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant ): Viande de volaille et œufs et leurs produits 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable: [ ] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [X] Régions ou pays spécifiques : États du Delaware et du Kentucky (États -Unis d'Amérique) 5. Intitulé du texte notifié : Notice of Administration Order of Saudi Food and Drug Authority Ref . No. 20838 dated 15 March 2022 (12/08/1443 AH) entitled "Temporary ban on the importation of poultry meat, eggs and their products originating fr om Delaware and Kentucky states, United States of America" (Avis concernant l'Arrêté administratif de l'Autorité saoudienne des produits alimentaires et pharmaceutiques n° 20838 du 1 5 mars 2022 (12/08/1443 AH) portant interdiction temporaire de l'importati on de viande de volaille, d'œufs et de leurs produits originaires des États du Delaware et du Kentucky (États -Unis d'Amérique)) . Langue(s) : arabe. Nombre de pages : 1 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2022/SPS/SAU/22_2230_00_x.pdf 6. Teneur : Aux termes du rapport de l'OIE du 2 5 février 2 022, un foyer d'influenza aviaire hautement pathogène (IAHP) est apparu dans les États du Delaware et du Kentucky (États -Unis d'Amérique) . Conformément au chapitre 10.4 du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE), il est jugé nécessaire que le Royaume d'Arabie saoudite prévienne l'entrée de l'IAHP sur son sol . Par conséqu ent, il est appliqué une suspension temporaire de l'importation dans le Royaume d'Arabie saoudite, depuis les États du Delaware et du Kentucky, de viande de volaille et d'œufs et de leurs produits (à l'exception de la viande de volaille transformée et des ovoproduits ayant subi un traitement thermique ou autre permettant d'assurer la neutralisation des virus de l'influenza aviaire). 7. Objectif et raison d'être : [X] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [ ] santé des animaux, [ ] préservation des végétaux, [ ] protection des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [ ] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à des parasites. G/SPS/N/SAU/459 - 2 - 8. Nature du (des) problème(s) urgent(s) et raison pour laquelle la mesure d'urgence est prise : La présence d'un foyer d'IAHP dans les États du Delaware et du Kentucky a fait l'objet d'une annonce officielle de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE ). Le Royaume d'Arabie saoudite établit la mesure d'urgence notifiée dans le but de prévenir l'introduction de l'IAHP sur son territoire. 9. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente ? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle: [ ] Commission du Codex Al imentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : [X] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE) (par exemple, numéro du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux a quatiques) : Chapitre 10,4 du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres. [ ] Convention internationale pour la protection des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP) : [ ] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme internationale pertinente? [X] Oui [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internationale: 10. Autres documents pertinents et langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: 11. Date d'entrée en vigueur ( jj/mm/aa )/période d'application (le cas échéant) : 15 mars 2 022 [ ] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Organisme ou autorité désign é pour traiter les observations : [X] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Saudi Food and Drug Authority SFDA - 4904 North Ring branch rd - Hitteen Dist Unit Number (1) - Riyadh 13513 - 7148 Téléphone : +(966 11) 275 9222, Ext. 3158 Fax: +(966 11) 210 9825 Courrier électronique : SPSEP.Food@sfda.gov.sa Site Web: http://www.sfda.gov.sa 13. Texte(s) disponible(s) auprès de : [X] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Saudi Food and Drug A uthority SFDA - 4904 North Ring branch rd - Hitteen Dist Unit Number (1) - Riyadh 13513 - 7148 Téléphone : +(966 11) 275 9222, Ext. 3158 Fax: +(966 11) 210 9825 Courrier électronique : SPSEP.Food@sfda.gov.sa Site Web: http://www.sfda.gov.sa

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NEU345.pdf

r_G_SPS_NEU345

G/SPS/N/EU/345 11 septembre 2019 (19-5850) Page: 1/3 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION 1. Membre notifiant: UNION EUROPÉENNE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés : 2. Organisme responsable: Commission européenne, Direction générale Santé et sécurité alimentaire 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figurant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC. Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant ): Anima ux, produ its d’origine animale , produits composés , produits germinaux , sous-produits animaux , produits dérivés et foin et paille, végétaux , produits végétaux ou autres objets. 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable : [X] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [°] Régions ou pays spécifiques : 5. Intitulé du texte notifié : Commission Implementing Regulation establishing detailed rules on the operations to be carried out during and after the documentary checks, identity checks and physical checks on animals and goods subject to official controls at the border control posts (Text with EEA relevance) (Règlement d’exécution de la Commission établissant des règles détaillées relatives aux actions à mener pendant et après les contrôles documentaires, les contrôles d’identité et les contrôles physiques visant les animaux et les biens soumis à des contrôles officiels aux postes de contrôle frontaliers (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE) ). Langue(s): anglais . Nombre de pages : 14 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/SPS/EEC/19_5002_00_e.pdf https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/SPS/EEC/19_5002_01_e.pdf 6. Teneur : Conformément au Règlement ( UE) 2017/625 concernant les contrôles officiels et les autres activités officielles servant à assurer le respect de la législation alimentaire et de la législation relative aux aliments pour animaux ainsi que des règles relatives à la santé et au bien -être des animaux, à la santé des végétaux et aux produits phytopharmaceutiques , certains catégorie s d’animaux et de biens provenant de pays tiers doivent être soumis à des contrôles officiels spécifiques aux postes de contrôle frontaliers . L’article 49 :1 du Règlement (UE) 2017/625 prescrit que les autorités compétentes doivent effectue r des contrôles officiels sur ces animaux et biens à leur arrivée au poste de contrôle frontalier. Ces contrôles officiels doivent compren dre des contrôles documentaires, des contrôles d’iden tité et des contrôles physiques . Le règlement notifié fixe des règles détaillées relatives à la réalisation des contrôles documentaires, des contrôles d’identité et des contrôles physiques aux postes de contrôle frontaliers . Les actions actuellement menées pendant les contrôles documentaires, les contrôles d’identité et les contrôles physiques ont démontré leur efficacité et garantissent un niveau élevé de performance de ces contrôles . Par conséquent, les règles établies dans le règlement notifié assurent le maintien des exigences applicables aux actions à mener G/SPS/N/EU/345 - 2 - pendant e t après ces contrôles aux postes de contrôle frontaliers . Date d’entrée en vigueur : 14 décemb re 2019 7. Objectif et raison d'être: [X] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [X] santé des animaux, [X] préservation des végétaux, [X] protection des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [X] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à des parasites. 8. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle : [ ] Commission du Codex Alimentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : [ ] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OIE) (par exemple, numéro de chapitre du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux aquatiques) : [°] Convention internationale pour la protection des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP) : [X] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme internationale pertinente? [ ] Oui. [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internationale : 9. Autres documents pertinents et langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: 10. Date projetée pour l'adoption (jj/mm/aa) : 31 octob re 2019 (date prévue) . Date projetée pour la publication (jj/mm/aa) : 30 novemb re 2019 (date prévue) . 11. Date projetée pour l'entrée en vigueur: [°] Six mois à compter de la date de publication, et/ou (jj/mm/aa) : 20 jours après publication au Journal officiel de l'Union européenne [ ] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Date limite pour la présentation d es observations: [°] Soixante jours à compter de la date de distribution de la notification et/ou (jj/mm/aa) : Trente jours à compter de la date de distribution de la notification . Organisme ou autorité désigné pour traiter les observations: [X] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national. Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Commission européenne DG Santé et sécurité alimentaire, Unité D2 - Relations inte rnationales multilatérales Rue Froissart 101 B-1049 Bruxelles Téléphone: +(32 2) 29 54263 Fax: +(32 2) 29 98090 Courrier électronique: sps@ec.europa.eu G/SPS/N/EU/345 - 3 - 13. Entité auprès de laquelle le texte peut être obtenu: [X] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [X] point d'information national. Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Commission européenne DG Santé et sécurité alimentaire, Unité D2 - Relations internationales multilatérales Rue Froissart 101 B-1049 Bruxelles Téléphone: +(32 2) 29 54263 Fax: +(32 2) 29 98090 Courrier électronique : sps@ec.europa.eu

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_TBTN16_ISR924A1.pdf

q_G_TBTN16_ISR924A1

G/TBT/N/ISR/924/Add.1 27 August 2020 (20-5876) Page: 1/1 Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Original: English NOTIFICATION Addendum The following communication , dated 26 August 2020 , is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Israel . _______________ Title: SI 1295 - Dried or semi -dried fruits Reason for Addendum: [ ] Comment period changed - date: [ ] Notified measure adopted - date: [ ] Notified measure published - date: [ ] Notified measure enters into force - date: [ ] Text of final measure available from1: [X] Notified measure withdrawn or revoked - date: 21 June 2020 Relevant symbol if measure re -notified: [ ] Content or scope of notified measure changed New deadline for comments (if applicable): [ ] Interpretive guidance issued and text available from1: [ ] Other: Description: __________ 1 This information can be provided by including a website address, a pdf attachment, or other information on where the text of the final measure and/or interpretive guidance can be obtained.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A41.pdf

r_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A41

WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/Add.4 1 13 mars 2020 (20-1996) Page: 1/1 Comité du commerce et du développement Original: espagnol NOTIFICATION DES MODIFICATIONS AFFECTANT LA MISE EN ŒUVRE D'UN ACCORD COMMERCIAL RÉGIONAL Addendum AAP.CE n° 42 (articles 7 et 8 du TM80) 1. Membre(s) adressant la notification: Chili et Cuba 2. Date de la notification: 31 octobre 2001 3. Notification au titre: ( ) de l'article XXIV:7 a) du GATT de 1994 ( ) de l'article V:7 a) de l'AGCS (X) du paragraphe 4 a) de la Clause d'habilitation 4. Parties à l'Accord: Chili et Cuba 5. Date de signature: : 20 décembre 1999 6. Date(s) d'entrée en vigueur: 27 juin 2008 7. Description succincte de l'Accord: AAP.CE n° 42 (articles 7 et 8 du TM80) L'Accord de portée partielle de complémentarité économique n° 42 (AAP.CE n° 42) a pour objet, entre autres, de faciliter, développer, diversifier et promouvoir le commerce des marchandises entre les parties . À cette fin, celles -ci sont convenues de s'accorder des préférences sur les droits en vigueur pour les pays tiers (annexe I en faveur du Chili et annexe II en faveur de Cuba). D'autre part, l'AAP.CE n° 42 contient des dispositions en matière, entre autres, de restrictions non tarifaires, de normes d'origine, de clauses de sauvegarde, de normes et de règlements techniques, de mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires, et de coopération commerciale. 8. Le texte et les listes, annexes et protocoles y relatifs sont: ( ) communiqués au Secrétariat de l'OMC (format électronique) (X) accessibles par le (les) lien(s) Internet officiel(s) ci -après: http://www.aladi.org/nsfaladi/textacdos.nsf/800d239280151ad283257d8000551d1f/0b b3c17fa53157400325684f0040bd5b?OpenDocum ent

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_IP_N_1TPKM29.pdf

q_IP_N_1TPKM29

IP/N/1/TPKM/29 IP/N/1/TPKM/T/10 13 August 2020 (20-5550) Page: 1/2 Council for Trade -Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Original: English NOTIFICATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE TRIPS AGREEMENT THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU : REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FILING TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES BY ELECTRONIC MEANS Notifying Member THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN , PENGHU , KINMEN AND MATSU Details of the notified legal text Title Regulations Governing the Implementation of Filing Trademark Applications and Services by Electronic Means Subject matter Trademarks Nature of notification [ ] Main dedicated intellectual property law or regulation [X] Other law or regulation Link to legal text* https://ip -documents.info/2020/IP/TPKM/20_4785_00_e.pdf https://ip -documen ts.info/2020/IP/TPKM/20_4785_00_x.pdf Notification status [ ] First notification [ ] Amendment or revision to notified legal text [X] Replacement or consolidation of notified legal text(s) Previous notification(s) referred to IP/N/1/TPKM/O/2, IP/N/1/TPKM/10 Brief description of the notified legal text The Regulations Governing the Implementation of Filing Trademark Applications and Services by Electronic Means w ere amended to remedy the situation concerning trademark e -filings where transmission takes longer than usual due to file size or where failures occur in TIPO's filing system that disrupts e -filing process. The amendment introduces an alternative method for electronic transmission, whereby a user may store the files on a read -only DVD disc and submit it in person or via postal service to TIPO to c omplete the e -filing process. Language(s) of notified legal text English, Chinese Entry into force 1 July 2020 Other date Adoption: 9 June 2020 IP/N/1/TPKM/29 • IP/N/1/TPKM/T/10 - 2 - Notification details Submission date of notification 7 August 2020 Other information Please refer to the website of the Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) of the Ministry of Economic Affairs to get more information about the Regulations Governing the Implementation of Filing Trademark Applications and Services by Electr onic Means. Website: http://www.tipo.gov.tw Contact email address: ipogp@tipo.gov.tw Agency or authority responsible Ministry of Economic Affairs * Links are provided to texts of laws and regulations notified under the TRIPS Agreement in the form supplied by the Member concerned; the WTO Secretariat does not endorse or revise their content.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/273618_2021_TBT_CIV_21_3101_00_f.pdf

273618_2021_TBT_CIV_21_3101_00_f

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_UGA1142A1.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_UGA1142A1

G/TBT/N/UGA/1142/Add.1 8 de agosto de 2022 (22-5939) Página: 1/1 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 8 de agosto de 2022 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación de Uganda . _______________ Título : Proyecto de Norma de Uganda DUS DEAS 1004:2019, Raw macadamia kernel - Specification (Granos crudos de macadamia . Especificaciones), 1ª edición Motivo del addendum : [ ] Modificación del plazo para presentar observaciones - fecha: [X] Adopción de la medida notificada - fecha : 14 de diciembre de 2021 [ ] Publicación de la medida notificada - fecha: [ ] Entrada en vigor de la medida notificada - fecha: [X] Indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva1: https://webstore.unbs .go.ug/ [ ] Retiro o derogación de la medida notificada - fecha: Signatura pertinente, en el caso de que se vuelva a notificar la medida: [ ] Modificación del contenido o del ámbito de aplicación de la medida notificada e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: Nuevo plazo para presentar observaciones (si procede): [ ] Publicación de documentos interpretativos e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: [ ] Otro motivo: Descripción : Mediante el presente addendum , Uganda hace saber a los Miembros de la OMC que el proyecto de Norma de Uganda DUS D EAS 1004 :2019 (Granos crudos de macadamia . Especificaciones), 1ª edición, notificado en el documento G/TBT/N/UGA/1142, se adoptó el 14 de diciembre de 2021. L a Norma de Uganda US EAS 10 04:2021 (Granos crudos de macadamia . Especificaciones), 1ª edición, puede adquirirse en línea en el siguiente enlace: https://webstore.unbs.go.ug/ __________ 1 Entre otras cosas, puede aportarse la dirección de un sitio web, un anexo en pdf u otra información que indique dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva/modificada y/o documentos interpretativos.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NCOL342.pdf

s_G_SPS_NCOL342

G/SPS/N/COL/342 13 de diciembre de 2022 (22-9265) Página: 1/3 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN 1. Miembro que notifica: COLOMBIA Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable: Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario - ICA 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): Animales, vegetales y sus productos 4. Regiones o países que podrían verse afectados, en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [X] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [ ] Regiones o países específicos: 5. Título del documento notificado: Proyecto de Resolución: "Por la cual se establecen las condiciones para el ingreso de animales, vegetales y sus productos al país, que no cuenten con requisitos sanitarios y/o fitosanitarios de importación y se dictan otras disposiciones" . Idioma(s): español . Número de páginas: 13 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2022/SPS/COL/22_8534_00_s.pdf 6. Descripción del contenido: El proceso de análisis de riesgo es un procedimiento técnico - científico desarrollado en el marco de las normas internacionales para establecer las condiciones o requisitos zoosanitarios o fitosanitarios para el ingreso de animales, vegetales y sus productos y facilitar el comercio, motivo por el cual se hace necesario definir y adoptar nuevas directrices para el establecimiento de dichos requisitos a nivel nacional, que atienda la actual incertidumbre mundial de inseguridad alimentaria, la cambiante oferta climática y otros desafíos globales para el acceso de nuevos mercados, en línea con las directrices o lineamientos establecidos por la Organización Mundial del Comercio y los respectivos Acuerdos Internacionales, sin desconocer el rigor técnico que exige este tipo de procesos. En razón a esto se presenta el proyecto de resoluc ión que tiene por objeto establecer las condiciones para el ingreso de animales, vegetales y sus productos al país que no cuenten con requisitos sanitarios y/o fitosanitarios de importación. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser: [ ] inocuidad de los alimentos, [X] sanidad animal, [X] preservación de los vegetales, [ ] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [ ] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. 8. ¿Existe una norma internacional pertinent e? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [ ] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejemplo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animales Acuáticos) : G/SPS/N/COL/342 - 2 - [X] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : NIMF Nos. 2, 11 y 38 [ ] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? [X] Sí [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible, en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional: 9. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s) en que están disponibles: Resolución número 2384 de 2019 y la 104058 de 202 1 10. Fecha propuesta de adopción (día/mes/año) : Fecha de publicación en el diario oficial. Fecha propuesta de publicación (día/mes/año) : Por determinar. 11. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor: [ ] Seis meses a partir de la fecha de publicación, y/o (día/mes/año) : La resolución rige a partir de la fecha de su publicación en el Diario Oficial. [ ] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones: [X] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : 11 de febrero de 2023 Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones: [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [ ] Servici o nacional de información. Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico ( en su caso ) de otra institución: Angela Fetecua Castellanos Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo Dirección de Regulación Calle 28 # 13 A 15 piso 3, Bogotá, DC Tel: +(571) 606 7676 Correo electrónico: afetecua@mincit.gov.co Sitio web: http://www.mincit.gov.co Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo Dirección de Regulación Calle 28 # 13 A 15 piso 3, Bogotá, DC Tel: +(57 1) 606 7676, Ext. 1340 Correo electrónico: puntocontacto@mincit.gov.co Sitio web: http://www.mincit.gov.co G/SPS/N/COL/342 - 3 - 13. Texto (s) disponible (s) en: [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [ ] Servicio nacional de información. Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico ( en su caso ) de otra institución: Angela Fetecua Castellanos Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo Dirección de Regulación Calle 28 # 13 A 15 piso 3, Bogotá, DC Tel: +(571) 606 7676 Correo electrónico: afetecua@mincit.gov.co Sitio web: http://www.mincit.gov.co Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo Dirección de Regulación Calle 28 # 13 A 15 piso 3, Bogotá, DC Tel: +(57 1) 606 7676, Ext. 1340 Correo electrónico: puntocontacto@mincit.gov.co Sitio web: http://www.mincit.gov.co

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_INF_IFD_W8.pdf

s_INF_IFD_W8

INF/IFD/W/8 17 de septiembre de 2019 (19-5954) Página: 1/2 Original: inglés DEBATES ESTRUCTURADOS SOBRE LA FACILITACIÓN DE LAS INVERSIONES PARA EL DESARROLLO CALENDARIO DE REUNIONES Septiembre - diciembre de 2019 1. El calendario de reuniones propuesto para el período comprendido entre septiembre y diciembre de 2019 ha sido preparado bajo la responsabilidad del Coordinador . Para elaborarlo se han celebrado amplias consultas con las delegaciones. 2. Siguiendo las orientac iones dadas en la Declaración Ministerial conjunta1, el calendario propuesto se ha preparado con miras a ayudar a los Miembros a desarrollar los elementos de un marco multilateral sobre la facilitación de las inversiones para el desarrollo . El calendario d e reuniones propuesto se entiende sin perjuicio de la posición de los Miembros respecto de las cuestiones que se examinarán. 3. A fin de facilitar el proceso, las reuniones del segundo semestre de 2019 se seguirán organizando por temas, sobre la base del docu mento de trabajo preparado y distribuido por el Coordinador en julio de 20192, bajo su responsabilidad, a petición de los Miembros participantes . Sobre la base de las observaciones recibidas de los Miembros, las cuestiones objeto de examen se han distribui do en tres reuniones sustantivas, con el objetivo de asignar los temas/cuestiones y la carga de trabajo de manera equilibrada y eficiente . De esta forma, los Miembros podrán prepararse de antemano y centrarse en los distintos elementos/cuestiones que se ex aminarán en cada reunión . Los Miembros tendrán la oportunidad en cada reunión de volver a examinar las cuestiones examinadas en reuniones anteriores o plantear cualquier cuestión relacionada con la facilitación de las inversiones. 4. Los trabajos seguirán est ando dirigidos por los Miembros y orientados a la obtención de resultados . Se alienta a los Miembros a que participen activamente en los debates y a que expongan sus opiniones/posiciones concretas sobre l as distint as cuestiones objeto de examen en cada reu nión. 5. En consonancia con el carácter abierto, transparente e inclusivo de los debates, se invita y alienta a todos los Miembros de la OMC a participar en las reuniones. _______________ 1 De fecha 13 de diciembre de 2017 (WT/MIN(17)/59). 2 El documento de trabajo figura en el documento INF/IFD/RD/39, de fecha 24 de julio de 2019. INF/IFD/W/8 - 2 - CALENDARIO DE REUNIONES PROPUESTO (SEPTIEMBRE - DICIEMBRE DE 2019)3 Reunión de organización del 23 de septiembre 17 y 18 de octubre 31 de octubre y 1º de noviembre 25 y 26 de noviembre 12 y 13 de diciembre Reunión de balance • Calendario de reuniones propuesto • Exposición/presentación del documento de trabajo Transparencia y previsibilidad de las medidas en materia de inversiones (Sección II) • Publicación y disponibilidad de medidas y de la información • Notificación a la OMC • Servicios de información • Excepciones específicas aplicables a las prescripciones en materia de transparencia Mecanismos de tipo punto de contacto/centro de coordinación/mediador, mecanismos para mejorar la coordinación interna y cooperación transfronteriza (Sección IV) • Mecanismos de tipo punto de contacto/centro de coordinación /mediador • Coordinación interna • Comité Nacional de Facilitación de las Inversiones • Cooperación transfronteriza Otras cuestiones relacionadas con la facilitación de las inversiones que los Miembros deseen examinar Racionalizar y agilizar los procedimientos y requisitos administrativos (Sección III) • Administración coherente, razonable, objetiva e imparcial de las medidas • Reducción y simplificación de los procedimientos administrativos y requisitos de documentación • Criterios y requisitos claros para los procedimientos administrativos • Procedimientos de autorización/aprobación • Trato de las soli citudes incompletas y denegación de solicitudes • Derechos y cargas • Examen periódico de los procedimientos y requisitos administrativos • Utilización de las TIC/gobierno electrónico • Mecanismos de tipo ventanilla única • Independencia de las autoridades competent es. • Recursos y revisión Otras cuestiones relacionadas con la facilitación de las inversiones que los Miembros deseen examinar Trato especial y diferenciado para los países en desarrollo y los países menos adelantados Miembros (Sección V) • Principios generales • Aplicación • Asistencia técnica y creación de capacidad Cuestiones transversales (Sección VI) • Microempresas y pequeñas y medianas empresas (MIPYME) • Responsabilidad social de las empresas • Medidas contra la corrupción/lucha contra la corru pción Alcance y principios generales (Sección I) Disposiciones institucionales y disposiciones finales (Sección VII) Otras cuestiones relacionadas con la facilitación de las inversiones que los Miembros deseen examinar __________ 3 Las secciones del calendario coinciden con las del documento de trabajo (INF/IFD/RD/39).

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN18_CAN571A1.pdf

s_G_TBTN18_CAN571A1

G/TBT/N/CAN/571/Add.1 20 de noviembre de 2020 (20-8402) Página: 1/2 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés/francés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 20 de noviembre de 2020 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación del Canadá . _______________ Título : Regulations amending the Fertilizers Regulations (Reglamento por el que se modifica el Reglamento de Abonos) Motivo del addendum : [ ] Modificación del plazo para presentar observaciones - fecha: [X] Adopción de la medida notificada - fecha : 26 de octubre de 2020 [X] Publicación de la medida notificada - fecha : 11 de noviembre de 2020 [X] Entrada en vigor de la medida notificada - fecha : 26 de octubre de 2020 [X] Indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva1: http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp -pr/p2/2020/2020 -11-11/html/sor -dors232 -eng.html http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp -pr/p2/2020/2020 -11-11/html/sor -dors232 -fra.html [ ] Retiro o derogación de la medida notificada - fecha: Signatura pertinente, en el caso de que se vuelva a notificar la medida: [ ] Modificación del contenido o del ámbito de aplicación de la medida notificada Nuevo plazo para presentar observaciones (si procede): [ ] Publicación de documentos interpretativos e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: [ ] Otro motivo: Descripción : El 11 de noviembre de 2020 el Organismo Canadiense de Inspección de Alimentos (CFIA) publicó la versión definitiva del Reglamento por el que se modifica el Reglamento de Abonos . Las modificaciones introducen un enfoque basado en el riesgo y refuerzan los co ntroles reglamentarios para la seguridad de los productos, la sostenibilidad del medio ambiente y la protección de los consumidores, al tiempo que reducen la carga normativa y administrativa para las 1 Entre otras cosas, puede aportarse la dirección de un sitio web, un anexo en PDF u otra información que indique dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva y/o documentos interpretativos. G/TBT/N/CAN/571/Add.1 - 2 - partes sujetas a la reglamentación . El Reglamento se not ificó previamente mediante el documento G/TBT/N/CAN/571. Las modificaciones incluidas en el Reglamento de Abonos son las siguientes: • Se actualizan las definiciones de los productos y los criterios de composición de las materias primas para ajustarlos a los conocimientos científicos actuales, las tendencias de la industria y las normas internacionales; • Se utiliza la incorporación por referencia para facilitar las actualizaciones periódicas de la Lista de materiales a medida que se disponga de nueva información; • Se aclaran cuáles son las exenciones generales respecto de todas las disposiciones de la Ley de Abonos y del Reglamento para facilitar la importación de los productos destinados a la exportación o la fabricación; • Se introduce un enfoque basado en el riesgo para apoyar la innovación y acelerar el acceso a los mercados para los abonos y complementos de abonos inocuos, manteniendo al mismo tiempo unas normas estrictas de seguridad para los productos; • Se armoniza la intervención y supervisión regla mentarias con los posibles riesgos para la salud y la seguridad asociados con el producto y su uso (exenciones respecto del registro revisadas); • Se reduce la carga normativa y administrativa para las partes sujetas a la reglamentación mediante la simplific ación del proceso de registro, renovación y modificación de registro ; y • Se modernizan las prescripciones de etiquetado para permitir una mayor flexibilidad y limitar la información que debe figurar obligatoriamente en las etiquetas . Toda la información requerida deberá figurar en los dos idiomas oficiales. Las modificaciones contienen disposiciones transitorias que permiten a las partes sujetas a la reglamentación cumplir o bien el Reglamento "nuevo" o bien el Reglamento "antiguo" por un período de tres año s. Esto se aplica a la fabricación, venta, importación o exportación de abonos y complementos de abonos reglamentados en virtud de la Ley de Abonos . No se permite combinar disposiciones del Reglamento "nuevo" y del "antiguo" . Los promotores de productos de ben cumplir o bien el Reglamento "nuevo" o bien el Reglamento "antiguo" con respecto a cada producto. __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A18S15.pdf

q_WT_COMTD_RTA15N1A18S15

WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/Add.18/Suppl.15 8 February 2022 (22-0995) Page: 1/1 Committee on Trade and Development Original: Spanish NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES AFFECTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENT Supplement AAP.CE 18.25 (Articles 7 and 8 of the TM80) 1. Member(s) notifying : Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay 2. Date of notification : 31 October 2001 3. Notification pursuant to: [ X ] Paragraph 14 of the Transparency Mechanism for Regional Trade Agreements (WT/L/671) 4. Changes affect : [ X ] goods [ ] services [ ] both 5. Original RTA being modified : TM80 6. WTO document reference of original notification of RTA: L/5342 - WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1 - WT/COMTD/RTA15/N/1/Add.18 7. Parties to the Agreement : Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay 8. Date of adoption : 4 December 2000 9. Date(s) of entry into force/provisional application : 4 December 2000 10. Brief description of changes: AAP.CE 18.25 (Articles 7 and 8 of the TM80) Additional Protocol No. 25 to Partial Scope Economic Complementarity Agreement No. 18 (AAP.CE 18.25) establishes that, for the purposes of the Agreement, the tariff classification of goods will be expressed in accordance with MERCOSUR Common Nomenclature (MCN). 11. Text and rela ted schedules, annexes and protocols are: [ ] submitted to the WTO Secretariat (electronic format) [ X ] available from the following official Internet link(s): https://www2.aladi.org/nsfaladi/textacdos.nsf/800d239280151ad283257d8000551d1f/7a6 0ae11072b77c0032569ac0054fdd1?OpenDocument

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/q_G_SPS_NNZL730.pdf

q_G_SPS_NNZL730

G/SPS/N/NZL/730 25 August 2023 (23-5737) Page: 1/2 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English NOTIFICATION 1. Notifying Member: NEW ZEALAND If applicable, name of local government involved: 2. Agency responsible: Ministry for Primary Industries 3. Products covered (provide tariff item number(s) as specified in national schedules deposited with the WTO; ICS numbers should be provided in addition, where applicable): Applies to importers of waste for recovery, reprocessing, recycling or disposal from all countries. Those involved with the importation, shipment and the treatment of these items should also know and understand the requirements of this Standard. 4. Regions or countries likely to be affected, to the extent relevant or practicable : [X] All trading partners [ ] Specific regions or countries: 5. Title of the notified document: Waste for Recovery, Reprocessing, Recycling or Disposal . Language(s): English . Number of pages: 16 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/SPS/NZL/23_12018_00_e.pdf 6. Description of content: The proposed Waste standard will revoke the current Inorganic Risk Material standard. Major changes to the standard include the addition of offshore treatment providers and adjustment of treatment timeframes. There is also clarification of existing procedures and the widening of the range of commodities that can be imported (such as cardboard, paper, plastic, hazardous waste for destruction, scrap metal, and asbestos for destruction etc.). Given the expansion of the scope the standards name has also been changed to the Import Health Standa rd for Waste for Recovery, Reprocessing, Recycling or Disposal (Waste). 7. Objective and rationale: [ ] food safety, [X] animal health, [X] plant protection, [X] protect humans from animal/plant pest or disease, [X] protect territory from other damage fro m pests. 8. Is there a relevant international standard? If so, identify the standard: [ ] Codex Alimentarius Commission (e.g. title or serial number of Codex standard or related text) : [ ] World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (e.g. Terrestrial or Aquatic Animal Health Code, chapter number) : [ ] International Plant Protection Convention (e.g. ISPM number) : [X] None Does this proposed regulation conform to the relevant international standard? G/SPS/N/NZL/730 - 2 - [ ] Yes [ ] No If no, describe, whenever possible, how and why it deviates from the international standard: 9. Other relevant documents and language(s) in which these are available: Risk Management Proposal: the Import Health Standard for Waste Products for Recovery, Reprocessing, Recycling or Disposal https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2023/SPS/NZL/23_12018_01_e.pdf (available in English) 10. Proposed date of adoption (dd/mm/yy) : To be determined. Proposed date of publication (dd/mm/yy) : To be determined. 11. Proposed date of entry into force: [ ] Six months from date of publicati on, and/or (dd/mm/yy) : To be determined. [ ] Trade facilitating measure 12. Final date for comments: [ ] Sixty days from the date of circulation of the notification and/or (dd/mm/yy) : 20 September 2023 Agency or authority designated to handle comments: [X] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail address (if available) of other body: Sally Griffin, Coordinator, SPS New Zealand, PO Box 2526, Wellington, New Zealand. Tel: +(64 4) 894 0431; Fax: +(64 4) 894 0733; E -mail: sps@mpi.govt.nz Website: https://www.mpi.govt.nz/importing/overview/access -and-trade -into-new- zealand/world -trade -organization -notifications/ 13. Text(s) available from: [X] National Notification Authority, [X] National Enquiry Point. Address, fax number and e -mail address (if available) of other body: Sally Griffin, Coordinator, SPS New Zealand, PO Box 2526, Wellington, New Zealand. Tel: +(64 4) 894 0431; Fax: +(64 4) 894 0733; E -mail: sps@mpi.govt.nz Website: https://www.mpi.govt.nz/importing/overview/access -and-trade -into-new- zealand/world -trade -organization -notifications/

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_AG_NTPKM195.pdf

s_G_AG_NTPKM195

G/AG/N/TPKM/195 13 de noviembre de 2020 (20-8134) Página: 1/3 Comité de Agricultura Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 12 de noviembre de 2020, se distribuye a petición de la delegación del Territorio Aduanero Distinto de Taiwán, Penghu, Kinmen y Matsu . La notificación se refiere a la salvaguardia especial basada en el volumen ( cuadro MA.3 ). _______________ G/AG/N/TPKM/1 95 - 2 - Cuadro MA.3 ACCESO A LOS MERCADOS: TERRITORIO ADUANERO DISTINTO DE TAIWÁN, PENGHU, KINMEN Y MATSU Notificación de conformidad con el artículo 5 del Acuerdo: salvaguardia especial basada en el volumen 1. Designación del producto: Leche fresca 2. Número de la partida arancelaria: 04011010, 04012010, 04014010, 04015010, 04029910 3. Nivel de activación: 43.196 toneladas (calculado en el anexo 1) 4. Volumen de las importaciones que entren en el territorio en el período en curso: 43.208,8 toneladas 5. Período de aplicación: Del 29 de septiembre al 31 de diciembre de 2020 G/AG/N/TPKM/1 95 - 3 - SALVAGUARDIA ESPECIAL BASADA EN EL VOLUMEN: ANEXO 1 AL CUADRO MA.3 Datos necesarios para el cálculo del nivel de activación Se tiene en cuenta el consumo interno Importaciones en los tres años anteriores sobre los que se disponga de datos: Año Cantidad Unidad Año 1 2016 25.538,8 t Año 2 2017 34.851,3 t Año 3 2018 43.280,2 t 34.556,8 t Consumo interno en los tres años anteriores sobre los que se disponga de datos: Año Cantidad Unidad Año 1 2016 325.949,3 t Año 2 2017 338.652,1 t Año 3 2018 366.934,5 t 343.845,3 t Cálculo del nivel de activación de base Promedio de las importaciones Promedio del consumo interno Penetración de las importaciones (oportunidades de acceso al mercado): 34.556,8 / 343.845,3 = 10% X Nivel de activación de base si la penetración de las importaciones (oportunidades de acceso al mercado) es < o = 10% 125% x = si la penetración de las importaciones (oportunidades de acceso al mercado) es > 10% pero < o = 30% 110% x 34.556,8 = 38.012,5 si la penetración de las importaciones (oportunidades de acceso al mercado) es >30% 105% x = Y Variación del consumo interno 366.934,5 - 338.652,1 = 28.282,4 X + Y = 66.294,9 Tope de activación 125% x 34.556,8 = 43.196 Umbral de activación 105% x 34.556,8 = 36.284,6 Nivel de activación teniendo en cuenta el consumo interno 43.196 Método de imputación de la variación del consumo a la línea arancelaria de que se trate: __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_TBTN19_UGA1029A1.pdf

s_G_TBTN19_UGA1029A1

G/TBT/N/UGA/1029/Add.1 4 de enero de 2021 (21-0021) Página: 1/1 Comité de Obstáculos Técnicos al Comercio Original: inglés NOTIFICACIÓN Addendum La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 4 de enero de 2021 , se distribuye a petición de la delegación de Uganda . _______________ Título : Proyecto de Norma de Uganda DUS D EAS 968 :2019, Disposable adult diapers - Specification (Pañales desechables para adultos . Especificaciones), 1ª edición Motivo del addendum : [ ] Modificación del plazo para presentar observaciones - fecha: [X] Adopción de la medida notificada - fecha : 15 de diciembre de 2020 [ ] Publicación de la medida notificada - fecha: [ ] Entrada en vigor de la medida notificada - fecha: [X] Indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva1: https://webstore.unbs.go.ug/ [ ] Retiro o derogación de la medida notificada - fecha: Signatura pertinente, en el caso de que se vuelva a notificar la medida: [ ] Modificación del contenido o del ámbito de aplic ación de la medida notificada Nuevo plazo para presentar observaciones (si procede): [ ] Publicación de documentos interpretativos e indicación de dónde se puede obtener el texto1: [ ] Otro motivo: Descripción : Mediante el presente addendum , Uganda hace saber a los Miembros de la OMC que el Proyecto de Norma de Uganda DUS D EAS 968 :2019, Pañales desechables para adultos . Especificaciones (1ª edición), notificado en el documento G/TBT/N/UGA/1029, fue adoptado el 15 de diciembre de 2020. L a Nor ma de Uganda adoptada, US EAS 968 :2020, Pañales desechables para adultos . Especificaciones (1ª edición), puede adquirirse en línea en el siguiente enlace: https://webstore.unbs.go.ug/ __________ 1 Entre otras cosas, puede aportarse la dirección de un sitio web, un anexo en PDF u otra información que indique dónde se puede obtener el texto de la medida definitiva y/o documentos interpretativos.

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_SPS_NSAU513.pdf

r_G_SPS_NSAU513

G/SPS/N/SAU/513 17 juillet 2023 (23-4835) Page: 1/2 Comité des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires Original: anglais NOTIFICATION DE MESURES D'URGENCE 1. Membre notifiant : ROYAUME D'ARABIE SAOUDITE Le cas échéant, pouvoirs publics locaux concernés: 2. Organisme responsable : National Centre for the Prevention and Control of Plants Pest and Animal Diseases (Centre national pour la prévention et le contrôle des parasites des végétaux et des maladies des animaux) 3. Produits visés (Prière d'indiquer le(s) numéro(s) du tarif figur ant dans les listes nationales déposées à l'OMC . Les numéros de l'ICS devraient aussi être indiqués, le cas échéant) : Animaux d'élevage 4. Régions ou pays susceptibles d'être concernés, si cela est pertinent ou faisable: [ ] Tous les partenaires commerciaux [X] Régions ou pays spécifiques : Azerbaïdjan 5. Intitulé du texte notifié : Notice of the Ministry of Environment Water and Agriculture, Decision No. 247827 dated 29 June 2023 entitled "Allow importation of livestock originated from Azerbaijan" (Avis relatif à la Décision du Ministère de l'environnement, de l'eau et de l'agriculture n° 247827 du 2 9 juin 2023 portant autorisation de l'importation d'animaux d'élevage originaires de l'Azerbaïdjan ). Langue(s) : . Nombre de pages: 6. Teneur : La décision notifié est fondée sur la recommandation de l'autorisation d'importer, au Royaume d'Arabie saoudite, des animaux d'élevage en provenance d'Azerbaïdjan formulée par une équipe saoudienne spécialisée a près sa visite technique dans ce pays. 7. Objectif et raison d'être : [ ] innocuité des produits alimentaires, [X] santé des animaux, [ ] préservation des végétaux, [ ] protection des personnes contre les maladies ou les parasites des animaux/des plantes, [ ] protection du territoire contre d'autres dommages attribuables à des parasites. 8. Nature du (des) problème(s) urgent(s) et raison pour laquelle la mesure d'urgence est prise : La décision notifié est fondée sur la recommandation de l'autorisation d'im porter, au Royaume d'Arabie saoudite, des animaux d'élevage en provenance d'Azerbaïdjan formulée par une équipe saoudienne spécialisée après sa visite technique dans ce pays. 9. Existe -t-il une norme internationale pertinente ? Dans l'affirmative, indiquer laquelle: [ ] Commission du Codex Alimentarius (par exemple, intitulé ou numéro de série de la norme du Codex ou du texte apparenté) : [X] Organisation mondiale de la santé animale (OMSA) (par exemple, numéro de chapitre du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres ou du Code sanitaire pour les animaux aquatiques) : Chapitre 8.8 du Code sanitaire pour les animaux terrestres G/SPS/N/SAU/513 - 2 - [ ] Convention internationale pour la protection des végétaux (par exemple, numéro de la NIMP) : [ ] Néant La réglementation projetée est -elle conforme à la norme internationale pertinente? [X] Oui [ ] Non Dans la négative, indiquer, chaque fois que cela sera possible, en quoi et pourquoi elle diffère de la norme internationale: 10. Autres documents pertinents e t langue(s) dans laquelle (lesquelles) ils sont disponibles: 11. Date d'entrée en vigueur ( jj/mm/aa )/période d'application (le cas échéant) : 29 juin 2023 [ ] Mesure de facilitation du commerce 12. Organisme ou autorité désigné pour traiter les observations : [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [ ] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Saudi Food and Drug Authority - Food Sector Renseignements : M. M ohammed AL Huthiel SFDA - 4904 North Ring branch rd - Hitteen Dist Unit Number (1) - Riyadh 13513 - 7148 Téléphone : +(966 11) 203 8222 int. 3313 Courrier électronique: spsep.food@sfda.gov.sa Site Web: http://www.sfda.gov.sa 13. Texte(s) disponible(s) auprès de : [ ] autorité nationale responsable des notifications, [ ] point d'information national . Adresse, numéro de fax et adresse électronique (s'il y a lieu) d'un autre organisme: Saudi Food and Drug Authority - Food Sector Renseignements : M. M ohammed AL Huthiel SFDA - 4904 North Ring branch rd - Hitteen Dist Unit Number (1) - Riyadh 13513 - 7148 Téléphone : +(966 11) 203 8222 int. 3313 Courrier électronique: spsep.food@sfda.gov.sa Site Web: http://www.sfda.gov.sa

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/r_G_TBTN20_BRA999A1.pdf

r_G_TBTN20_BRA999A1

G/TBT/N/BRA/999/Add.1 27 avril 2021 (21-3544) Page: 1/2 Comité des obstacles techniques au commerce Original: anglais NOTIFICATION Addendum La communication ci -après, datée du 2 6 avril 2 021, est distribuée à la demande de la délégation du Brésil . _______________ Intitulé : Resolution - RDC number 493, 15 April 2021 (Décision RDC n° 493 du 1 5 avril 2 021) Motif de l'addendum: [ ] Modification du délai pour la présentation des observations - date: [X] Adoption de la mesure notifiée - date: 22 avril 2 021 [X] Publication de la mesure notifiée - date: 22 avril 2 021 [ ] Entrée en vigueur de la mesure notifiée - date: [X] Accès au texte final de la mesure1: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/ -/resolucao -rdc-n-493-de-15-de-abril-de-2021- 315225504 http://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3390773/RDC_493_2021_.pdf/363fcc3 c-27ea-4274-b4af-b74c4444d84e [ ] Retrait ou abrogation d e la mesure notifiée - date: Cote pertinente si la mesure fait l'objet d'une nouvelle notification: [ ] Modification de la teneur ou du champ d'application de la mesure notifiée1: Nouveau délai pour la présentation des observations (le cas échéant): [ ] Publication de directives d'interprétation et accès au texte1: [ ] Autres: Teneur : La consultation publique n° 811 du 6 avril 2 020 menée par l'ANVISA, notifiée précédemment au moyen du document G/TBT/N/BRA/999 et qui établit les exigences techniques pour l'identification en tant qu'aliment intégral et pour attirer l'attention sur les ingrédients intégraux dans l'étiqu etage des aliments contenant des céréales, a été adoptée en tant que Décision RDC n° 493 du 1 5 avril 2 021. 1 Il est possible d'indiquer une adresse de site Web, de joindre un fichier en format pdf ou de fournir tout autre renseignement permettant d'accéder au texte de la mesure finale/modifiée et/ou des directives d'interprétation. G/TBT/N/BRA/999/Add.1 - 2 - Le texte final, disponible en portugais uniquement, peut être téléchargé à l'adresse suivante: http://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3390773/RDC_493_2021_.pdf/363fcc3c -27ea- 4274-b4af-b74c4444d84e __________

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/s_G_SPS_NCHL600.pdf

s_G_SPS_NCHL600

G/SPS/N/CHL/600 20 de junio de 2019 (19-4205) Página: 1/2 Comité de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias Original: español NOTIFICACIÓN 1. Miembro que notifica: CHILE Si procede, nombre del gobierno local de que se trate: 2. Organismo responsable: Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero 3. Productos abarcados (número de la(s) partida(s) arancelaria(s) según se especifica en las listas nacionales depositadas en la OMC; deberá indicarse además, cuando proceda, el número de partida de la ICS): Pequeños rumiantes 4. Regiones o países que podría n verse afectados, en la medida en que sea procedente o factible: [X] Todos los interlocutores comerciales [ ] Regiones o países específicos: 5. Título del documento notificado: Fija las exigencias sanitarias para la internación a Chile de pequeños rumi antes con destino a matadero y deroga resolución n° 1.446 de 1992. Idioma(s): español . Número de páginas: 2 https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2019/SPS/CHL/19_3540_00_s.pdf 6. Descripción del contenido: A continuación, se señala a grandes rasgos las exigencias sanitarias para la internación a Chile de pequeños rumiantes con destino a matadero: − El país o zona de procedencia debe estar declarado oficialmente libre por la OIE, de peste bovina y fiebre aftosa sin vacunación, así como declarado libre de ot ras enfermedades indicadas en el numeral 1.1, condición sanitaria que debe estar reconocida por Chile ; − En el caso que el país o zona de procedencia no es libre de prurigo lumbar o scrapie, se deberán entregar antecedentes como lo señala el numeral 1.2. En los numerales siguientes se señalan condiciones a cumplir sobre: o Los establecimientos de origen de los animales ; o El lugar de nacimiento y crianza de los animales ; o Condición de cuarentena ; o Condiciones de transporte ; o La no presencia de signos clínicos de enfermedades infectocontagiosas que afecten a la especia y la no existencia de evidencia de ectoparásitos, dentro de las 48 horas previas al embarque ; o Los animales deben venir amparados por certificado sanitario oficial en las condiciones señal adas en el numeral 1.9; o Requisitos adicionales, dependiendo del ingreso a zonas o regiones libres de determinadas enfermedades. Finalmente se indica el accionar, al momento del arribo al país: − Posterior a la autorización de ingreso al país, los animales s erán transportados directamente al matadero, en medios de transporte sellados ; − Si se detecta alguna enfermedad, susceptible de transmitirse, el SAG podrá ordenar la devolución o el sacrificio de los animales, según corresponda ; G/SPS/N/CHL/600 - 2 - − El sometimiento a pruebas de diagnóstico, al momento del arribo de los animales al matadero, si el SAG determina que es necesario. 7. Objetivo y razón de ser: [ ] inocuidad de los alimentos, [X] sanidad animal, [ ] preservación de los vegetales, [ ] protección de la salud humana contra las enfermedades o plagas animales o vegetales, [ ] protección del territorio contra otros daños causados por plagas. 8. ¿Existe una norma internacional pertinente? De ser así, indíquese la norma: [ ] de la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius (por ejemplo, título o número de serie de la norma del Codex o texto conexo) : [X] de la Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal (OIE) (por ejemplo, número de capítulo del Código Sanitario para los Animales Terrestres o del Código Sanitario para los Animale s Acuáticos) : 8 y 14 [ ] de la Convención Internacional de Protección Fitosanitaria (por ejemplo, número de NIMF) : [ ] Ninguna ¿Se ajusta la reglamentación que se propone a la norma internacional pertinente? [X] Sí [ ] No En caso negativo, indíquese, cuando sea posible, en qué medida y por qué razón se aparta de la norma internacional: 9. Otros documentos pertinentes e idioma(s) en que están disponibles: 10. Fecha propuesta de adopción (día/mes/año) : A su publicación en el Diario Oficia l. Fecha propuesta de publicación (día/mes/año) : Aproximadamente 80 días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación. 11. Fecha propuesta de entrada en vigor: [ ] Seis meses a partir de la fecha de publicación, y/o (día/mes/año) : A su publicac ión en el Diario Oficial. [ ] Medida de facilitación del comercio 12. Fecha límite para la presentación de observaciones: [X] Sesenta días a partir de la fecha de distribución de la notificación y/o (día/mes/año) : 19 de agosto de 2019 Organismo o autoridad encargado de tramitar las observaciones: [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [ ] Servicio nacional de inform ación. Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico ( en su caso ) de otra institución: Correo electrónico: sps.chile@sag.gob.cl 13. Texto (s) disponible (s) en: [X] Organismo nacional encargado de la notificación, [ ] Servicio nacional de información. Dirección, número de fax y dirección de correo electrónico ( en su caso ) de otra institución: Correo electrónico: sps.chile@sag.gob.cl

WTO_1

WTO

WTO_1/256355_2019_SPS_CHE_19_4513_03_x.pdf

256355_2019_SPS_CHE_19_4513_03_x

[Signature] [QR Code] .... 1 Ordinanza sulle derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso (ODerr) Modifica del … Il Consiglio federale svizzero ordina: I L’ordinanza del 16 dicembre 20161 sulle derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ’uso è modificata come segue: Art. 2 cpv. 3 lett. a nota a piè di pagina e 4 lett. e 3 L’espressione «preparato» utilizzata in relazione agli oggetti d ’uso nella presente ordinanza e nelle ordinanze del DFI o dell ’USAV fondate sulla medesima corri- sponde al l’espressione «miscela» utilizzat a nei seguenti atti legislativi dell ’Unione europea (UE): a. regolamento (CE) n. 1223/20092; 4 Fatte salve le definizioni divergenti nella legislazione svizzera sull e derrate alimen- tari, i restanti termini della presente ordinanza e delle ordinanze del DFI o dell’USAV fondate su di essa sono utilizzati in base alle definizioni contenute nelle seguenti disposizioni dell ’UE: e. articolo 3 del regolamento (UE) n. 2017/62 53; RU … 1 RS 817.02 2 Regolamento ( CE) n. 1223/2009 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 30 novem- bre 2009, sui prodotti cosmetici, GU L 342 del 22.12.2009, pag. 59; modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (UE) 2017/222 8, GU L 319 del 4.12.2017, pag. 2. 3 Regolamento (UE) 2017/625 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 15 marzo 2017, relativo ai controlli ufficiali e alle altre attività ufficiali effettuati per garantire lʼapplicazione della legislazione sugli alimenti e sui mangimi, delle norme sulla salute e sul benessere degli animali, sulla sanità delle piante nonché sui prodotti fitosanitari, re- cante modifica dei regolamenti (CE) n. 999/2001, (CE) n. 396/2005, (CE) n. 1069/2009, (CE) n. 1107/2009, (UE) n. 1151/2012, (UE) n. 652/2014, (UE) 2016/429 e (UE) 2016/2031 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, dei regolamenti (CE) n. 1/2005 e (CE) n. 1099/2009 del Consiglio e delle direttive 98/58/CE, 1999/74/CE, 2007/43/CE, 2008/119/CE e 2008/120/CE del Consiglio, e che abroga i regolamenti (CE) n. 854/2004 e (CE) n. 882/2004 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, le direttive 89/608/CEE, Derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso. O RU … 2 Art. 5 cpv. 2 lett. a 2 L’autorizzazione si estingue se: a. il suo contenuto è ripreso nella normativa d ’attuazione; oppure Art. 14 cpv. 2 2 Le derrate alimentari possono essere unicamente designate tramite la denomina- zione specifica di una derrata ali mentare specificata se corrispondono alla specifica- zione e ai requisiti ad essa associati; sono fatte salve le denominazioni nella rispetti- va lingua conformemente all ’allegato 1 della decisione della Commissione 2010/791/UE4. Art. 15 cpv. 2 lett. a 2 Non s ono considerati nuovi tipi di derrate alimentari: a. le derrate alimentari geneticamente modificate; eccetto quelle di cui all’articolo 31 capoverso 5. Art. 31 cpv. 3 e 5 3 In caso di derrate alimentari che sono OGM o che li contengono, lʼUSAV dirige la procedura di autorizzazione. Esso trasmette la domanda all ’Ufficio federale dell’ambiente (UFAM) per una valutazione nella propria sfera di competenza. L’USAV rilascia l ’autor izzazione se, in base allo stato attuale della scienza, può essere escluso un pericolo per l ’ambiente. 5 Ai prodotti OGM si applicano gli articoli 15 –19, se: a. sono stati ottenuti da microorganismi geneticamente modificati; b. sono stati fabbricati in un siste ma chiuso secondo l ’articolo 3 lettera h dell’ordinanza del 9 maggio 20125 sull’impiego confinato; e c. sono stati separati da tali organismi, depurati e sono chimicamente definibili. Art. 33 cpv. 1, frase introduttiva 1 Chiunque consegna o importa derrate a limentari che sono OGM o che li contengo- no deve: Art. 37 Derrate alimentari geneticamente modificate 1 Occorre indicare che si tratta di OGM nel caso di: 89/662/CEE, 90/425/CEE, 91/496/CEE, 96/23/CE, 96/93/CE e 97/78/CE del Consiglio e la dec isione 92/438/CEE del Consiglio (regolamento sui controlli ufficiali), versione della GU L 95 del 7.4.2017, pag. 1. 4 Decisione della Commissione, del 20 dicembre 2010, che fissa l ʼelenco dei prodotti di cui allʼallegato XII, punto III.1, secondo comma, del regolamento (CE) n. 1234/2007 del Consiglio, versione della GU L 336 del 21.12.2010, pag. 55. 5 RS 814.912 Derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso. O RU … 3 a. derrate alimentari che sono prodotti OGM; b. derrate alimentari che contengono microorganismi gen eticamente modifica- ti; c. coadiuvanti tecnologici che sono consegnati come tali e sono prodotti OGM; d. microorganismi che sono consegnati come tali e sono geneticamente modifi- cati. 2 Il DFI disciplina il tipo e la modalità della caratterizzazione. 3 Esso può prevedere deroghe agli obblighi di caratterizzazione di cui al capoverso 1. 4 Le derrate alimentari possono essere contrassegnate con l ’indicazione «ottenuto senza ricorso alla tecnologia genetica» o con un ’altra indicazione equivalente, se sono soddis fatte le seguenti condizioni: a. per mezzo di una documentazione completa può essere provato che: 1. la derrata alimentare e gli ingredienti, i coadiuvanti tecnologici o i mi- croorganismi utilizzati per la sua produzione non provengono da orga- nismi genetic amente modificati, 2. fatto salvo il capoverso 5, per la produzione della derrata alimentare non sono stati utilizzati OGM, e 3. sono state adottate misure adeguate per evitare la presenza di materiale che è OGM, che lo contiene o è da esso ottenuto ; b. nessun ingrediente contiene prodotti OGM in misura superi ore allo 0,9 per cento in massa; c. derrate alimentari, coadiuvanti tecnologici o microrganismi dello stesso tipo: 1. sono stati autorizzati conformemente all ’articolo 31, oppure 2. possono essere pr odotti secondo il diritto svizzero con sostanze ausilia- rie dell ’agricoltura o con prodotti di base autorizzati che sono OGM, che li contengono o sono da essi ottenuti . 5 La condizione ai sensi del capoverso 4 lettera a numero 2 non si applica a: a. medica menti veterinari; b. additivi per alimenti per animali che 1. sono stati ottenuti secondo il procedimento descritto all ’articolo 31 ca- poverso 5; 2. sono dichiaratamente non disponibili senza manipolazioni genetiche; e 3. sono necessari per l ’approvvigio namento appropriato ai bisogni degli animali ai fini della loro salute e protezione. Art. 38 cpv. 2 e 3 2 L’USAV può, in singoli casi, autorizzare indicazioni sulla salute non ammesse, se: Derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso. O RU … 4 a. può essere dimostrato per mezzo di dati e informazioni scientif ici univer- salmente riconosciuti che la sostanza nutritiva, un ’altra sostanza, la derrata alimentare o la categoria alimentare presenta le proprietà indicate; e b. le indicazioni non inducono i consumatori in inganno sulle proprietà della sostanza nutritiva , di un ’altra sostanza, della derrata alimentare o della cate- goria alimentare. 3 Il DFI disciplina le altre disposizioni sulla procedura di autorizzazione. L ’articolo 3 non si applica a questa procedura. Art. 39 cpv. 2 lett. a e d 2 In ogni caso devono ess ere indicate per scritto: a. nel caso della carne di ungulati addomesticati, pollame domestico, ratiti e pesce: la provenienza dell ’animale utilizzato per la produzione della derrata alimentare; d. per le derrate alimentari non considerate preimballate ai sensi dell ’articolo 2 capoverso 1 numero 11 e che devono essere conservate refrigerate a seguito del rischio di riproduzione di microorganismi patogeni o di formazione di tossine: la data di scadenza. Art. 40 Commercio intermedio Nel commercio intermedio le indicazioni devono essere tali per cui le derrate ali- mentari con essi fabbricate poss ano essere composte e caratterizzate in conformità alla legge. Art. 48 cpv. 2 2 Non sono considerati materiali e oggetti quelli consegnati in qualità di articoli d’antiquariato. Art. 81 cpv. 3 3 Il DFI può dichiarare vincolanti determinate procedure di analisi e di campionatu- ra. Titolo dopo l ’art. 85 Capitolo 4 a: Obblighi delle aziende alimentari e delle aziende di oggetti d ’uso nei controlli ufficiali e in altre attiv ità ufficiali Art. 85a 1 Le aziende consentono agli organi di controllo , su loro richiesta , l’accesso: a. agli edifici, all ’attrezzatura, ai mezzi di trasporto, all ’area dell ’azienda e ad altri luoghi sotto la loro responsabilità e nel loro ambiente circos tante; Derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso. O RU … 5 b. alle merci sotto la loro responsabilità; c. ai loro sistemi d ’informazione; d. ai loro documenti e ad altre informazioni utili. 2 Durante i controlli ufficiali e altre attività ufficiali, esse sostengono il personale delle autorità di esecuzione competenti nell ’adempimento dei loro compiti, collabo- rando con esso. 3 Esse m ettono immediatamente a disposizione delle autorità di esecuzione compe- tenti, su carta o in forma elettronica, tutte le informazioni sulle merci e sulle loro attività. 4 Gli obbl ighi delle aziende secondo il presente articolo si applicano anche nei casi in cui i controlli ufficiali sono eseguiti da terzi ai sensi dell ’articolo 55 LDerr. Art. 90 Modalità di importazione 1 Chiunque importa per via aerea attraverso gli aeroporti di G inevra e Zurigo derrate alimentari che secondo gli allegati 1 o 2 dell ’ordinanza del ...6 sull’esecuzione della legislazione sulle derrate alimentari (OELDerr) sono sottoposte a controlli appro- fonditi deve notificare preventivamente per via elettronica all ’autorità competente del controllo ufficiale: a. la data e l ’orario dell ’arrivo della spedizione al punto di entrata designato nonché eventuali ritardi; b. il tipo di spedizione. 2 L’importatore è responsabile della dichiarazione preventiva conformemente all’articolo 2 capoverso 1 lettera i OELDerr. Egli può incaricare, per tale compito, una persona soggetta all ’obbligo di dichiarazione. 3 Per la notifica preventiva occorre compilare la parte I del modulo riportato nell’allegato II del regolamento (UE) n. 669/20097 (documento sanitario comune di entrata, DSCE) nel sistema d ’informazione veterinario secondo la decisione 2004/292/CE8 (TRACES). Il DSCE deve essere trasmesso all ’autorità di esecuzione del punto di entrata almeno un giorno lavorativo prima dell ’arrivo della spedizione. 4 Per le spese causate da spedizioni importate o fatte transitare senza la necessaria dichiarazione preventiva è riscosso un emolumento supplementare conformemente al numero 1.6 dell ’allegato 9 OELDerr. 5 La persona soggetta all ’obbligo di dichiarazione è tenuta a: 6 RS 817.042 7 Regolamento (CE) n. 669/2009 della Commissione, del 24 luglio 2009, recante modalità di applicazione del regolamento (CE) n. 88 2/2004 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio relativo al livello accresciuto di controlli ufficiali sulle importazioni di alcuni mangimi e alimenti di origine non animale e che modifica la decisione 2006/504/CE della Commis- sione, GU L 194 del 25.7.2009, p ag. 11. 8 Decisione 2004/292/CE della Commissione, del 30 marzo 2004, relativa all ʼapplicazione del sistema TRACES recante modifica della decisione 92/486/CEE, GU L 94 del 31.3.2004, pag. 63; modificata da ultimo dalla decisione 2005/515/CE, GU L 187 del 19.7.2005, pag. 29. Derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso. O RU … 6 a. mettere a disposizione dell ’USAV tutti i docum enti necessari per il control- lo; b. coadiuvare l ’USAV presentandogli le spedizioni da controllare secondo le sue disposizioni e riprendendone possesso al termine; e c. trasmettere le istruzioni dell ’USAV all ’impresa di spedizione o all’importatore. 6 Nella dichiarazione doganale deve indicare il numero del DSCE e gli emolumenti fissati dall ’USAV al momento del controllo. 7 Alle autorità responsabili dei controlli occorre mettere a disposizione: a. risorse sufficienti in termini di personale e di logistica per lo scarico e la pre- sentazione della spedizione; b. attrezzatura idonea al la campionatura (p. es. mezzi di trasporto o imballaggi particolari), qualora le attrezzatur e standard non permettano di effettuare un prelievo rappresentativo. 8 Le derrate alimentari composte che contengono meno del 20 per cento delle derrate alimentari di cui all ’allegato 2 OELDerr sono importate secondo la procedura de- scritta negli articoli 8 6 e 87. Art. 91 cpv. 1bis, 3 primo periodo e 6 1bis L’originale del DSCE accompagna la spedizione durante il trasporto successivo fino al luogo di destinazione citato nel documento stesso. L ’USAV può disporre deroghe. 3 Per le derrate alimentari che, a cau sa di un rischio elevato di contaminazione da aflatossine, devono essere sottoposte a controlli approfonditi, oltre al DSCE, deve essere disponibile un certificato di idoneità al consumo con i risultati delle analisi secondo l ’allegato II del regolamento d i esecuzione (UE) n. 884/20149. 6 L’USAV può emanare disposizioni riguardanti: a. la procedura che deve essere osservata per garantire la rintracciabilità; b. i documenti che devono accompagnare le merci, se le autorità competenti devono prelevare campio ni. Art. 95 a Disposizione transitoria della modifica del ... 1 Le derrate alimentari non conformi alla modifica del ... possono essere importate e fabbricate secondo il diritto anteriore sino al 30 aprile 2021 e consegnate ai consu- matori fino a esauriment o delle scorte. 9 Regolamento di esecuzione (UE) n. 884/2014 della Commissione, del 13 agosto 2014, che stabilisce condizioni particolari per l'importazione di determinati mangimi e alimenti da alcuni paesi terzi a causa del rischio di contaminazione da aflatossine e che abroga il regolamento (CE) n. 1152/2009, GU L 242 del 14.8.2014, pag. 4. Derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ʼuso. O RU … 7 II L’ordinanza del 19 maggio 201010 sull’immissione in commercio di prodotti con- formi a prescrizioni tecniche estere è modificata come segue: Art. 2 lett. b n. 1, 8 e 9 Costituiscono deroghe al principio di cui all ’articolo 16a capoverso 1 LOTC: b. le seguenti derrate alimentari: 1. Abrogato 8. derrate alimentari che recano una menzione riguardo alla fabbricazione senza ricorso alla tecnologia genetica non conforme ai requisiti di cui all’articolo 37 capoversi 4 e 5 dell’ordinanza del 16 dicem bre 201611 sulle derrate alimentari e gli oggetti d ’uso (ODerr), 9. derrate alimentari fabbricate con procedimenti soggetti ad autorizzazio- ne secondo l ’articolo 28 capoverso 1 ODerr, nonché derrate alimentari che sono OGM, li contengono o sono da essi otten ute e che necessitano dell’autorizzazione secondo l ’articolo 31 della suddetta ordinanza, III 1 La presente ordinanza entra in vigore il 1° maggio 2020. … In nome del Consiglio federale svizzero: Il presidente della Confederazione, Il cancelliere della C onfederazione, Walter Thurnherr 10 RS 946.513.8 11 RS 817.02

WTO_1

WTO