Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2539

Rafa Ferrer

A golpes

muchocine

It meets, there is no a better word with which one can define the plot, the note, and the tape reportedly meets what intended, is not otherwise entertain.

Meets, there is no a better word with which one can define the plot, the note, and the tape reportedly meets what intended, is not otherwise entertain, complies with the simplicity of the characters (some are seen coming from the first minutes of footage), meets the argument (simple, perhaps debtor tape as "Street dogs" and "Street dogs")(all films of the Torete and the Heifer and even this film cañí taste that we saw in the 1980s).Both Natalia Verbeke, as Daniel Guzman met with their respective roles and is in 1: 45 min. (including credits) can not ask for more than what the tape gives us, meets, and little else.By the way, a couple of scenes out streets of my neighborhood, Aluche.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1022

Silvia Giner

Lila dice

muchocine

Without hand slap to?The camino de los ingleses? with which it shares many similarities but which leaves to the height of bitumen.

I decided to make this film criticism, because it is the best example I can give you to qualify, what I wanted to express when I spoke of "The way of the English".Well, Lila says is a 2004 film (released in 2005 I think) and that these days for those with TV cable, can enjoy. It is the second film of Ziad Doueiri.Se is a story of teenagers in a humble neighborhood of Marseille. Lila is a "Lolita" 16 years will be a boy named Chimo crazy that you'll end up being writer because she became the source of her inspirations: Musa.Esta his story is an adaptation for the film of the novel by the enigmatic French author Chimo.Un true delight for the senses. Well directed, correct and credible actors in their interpretations and most importantly, to represent the age interpret (are not 30 years making teenage guys). Great soundtrack, first flat primerisimos amazing, excellent script and two protagonists at the height of any Hollywood actor.Vahina Giocante masterfully plays Lila, the Muse of Chimo. This girl is a real bomb, similar to the Brook Shields beauty when he made "The Lake blue". A woman disconcerting, living, organic, credible, great (of oscar?).It is a very sexual tape, there are explicit sex everywhere, but what happens? It in a way that no attacks to the Viewer, with all the nonsense that they say during their development, at no time are profanity, pornographic but rather, erotic and sensual.This film is a slap in the face without hand "Camino de los ingleses" with which it shares many similarities but which leaves to the height of the bitumen.I invite you to reflect: compare to the former master? dancer Vahina giocante's vids with the ex - aide Maria Ruiz? Vahina if it is a muse to inspire even a frog, a beauty and an eroticism to go crazy.Compare the adaptation of both novels and as brought to the big screen.Compare the casting impeccable "Lila says" with the abrupt casting of "camino de los ingleses".And above all, treating sexual one and another movie.Do gentlemen, "Lila says"? do is a live sample of what it means to adapt a novel, well what is a good movie (better or worse directed but in any case best film), which is an inspiring love and fuck? what is a muse?To see if many learn the fuck up what is make decent movies and what are actors truth pussy! Enough of so much dandruff and throw away the budget already by itself insufficient Spanish film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1602

Ramón Besonias

Bosque de sombras

muchocine

In backwoods tension arrives late and no reason to make it credible. In this sense, script failures are fateful, order what could have been a suggestive movie. It will be for the next, Koldo.

First feature film of Bilbao Koldo Serra, but not his first experience. In 1993 he made his first short film Sick of you, with WINS at the Valencia Cinema Jove. Followed by night car, Hachar me!, and love of mother (1999) and the Witch (2003), all very juicy's train. With this latest win many awards, among them the Meliés of gold to the best European fantastic film of 2003 short film. Also it has given TV spot (Licor 43, Bizkaia tourism, Galicia Calidade) and video clips (the dream of Morfeo, OBK, Extremoduro, Siniestro Total) as a filmmaker, Assistant of direction, storyboard artist and screenwriter. The boy also provides graphic design, such as writing for film festivals and samples of short films. He has published a comic album titled the beast of the day. Finally, Koldo knows the ex officio, but need many more notches in his revolver.In times of creative dryness, we hope that novice filmmakers take us out of darkness and us deslumbren with his materials operas fresh and desprejuiciadas. It happened with Amenábar or the small of the Trueba and Koldo Serra is presented in the media as a promising rookie which is poised to give us good moments of cinema? indeed, Amenábar also debuted with a thriller, gender greedy but very difficult to boot the attention of the public, perhaps because of the saturation. I have no doubt that Koldo is going in the right direction. Truth is that the technical Bill for backwoods is outstanding, and to newcomer he notices that he does know take the camera where required. And the Guipuzcoan exteriors are magical. But it ceases to count. The casting is deficient? except Oldman and Homar-both or more as it is dubbing (it is painful to hear Aitana!). The actors who interpret the brothers? a rookie Jon Ariño; Andrés Gértrudix, which at times is the more credible; and Kándido Uranga - are comic. Aitana is - besides unrecognizable - tasteless, like Paddy Considine, however much that becomes hard, the tape remains a memo. Only to Virginie Ledoyen? a Natalie Portman to French - are you felt tables, although Koldo wasted it; It would have been great to use it to lift the action, running through the forests of Articuza. Oldman and Homar are tremendous beyond where they are, but the script does not give much more.Koldo takes regarding film two very senior tapes that said drinking its forest of shadows: defence (Boorman, 1972) and (1971 Peckinpah) straw dogs. Does and it is true, they are relating direct, so direct that there are scenes from the script? written by Koldo and a colleague - who survive of the original. Do see if not the scene in which a sexy Virginie Ledoyen wet blouse in a source, leaving see little but plump nipples? as the Susan George in straw - before the contorted jaw dogs that seemed to fool the people? an excellent David Warner in straw dogs, and later in front of all the locals in the bar, and all for the attention of his cowardly hubby. Who has seen straw dogs know what they are talking about. Peckinpah tape tension grows slow but effective, only thing that we do not see in Bosque de sombras. The fact of extending in excess the presentation of characters and their emotional conflicts contributes very much to this. Except the scene initial at the bar, after an hour of movie nothing has happened, and we already are we expecting anything. It is late to hurry the drama which will trigger.No less close to straw dogs, they want to appear the scenes of the attempt of rape or of the appearance of the group before the door of the House. On defense, we find not only similar in the environment chosen and poorly exploited by Koldo to create anxiety in the Viewer, but also in the equally wasted idea that humans are transformed into beasts when survival comes to (defence). In forest of shadows, the environment there is so hostile and yes it looks like from the beginning the defense of Boorman. The presentation of the locals at the bar is ñoña, nursing home. Many sides put the actors, not sorry to go there to spend some fat and acojonante, beyond the teaser we saw on TV. In straw dogs, Peckinpah us coming with stealth, but surely the tragedy through the dispassionate relationship between the writer and his wife, and acts of exhibitionism of it before a group of locals excited to see walk naked to the home through the Windows of the House. In backwoods tension arrives late and no reason to make it credible. In this sense, script failures are fateful, order what could have been a suggestive movie. If Koldo had left him the script to someone more capable or lit, everything would be solved otherwise. A correct picture with dazzling landscapes is not enough to attract the attention of the public towards a genre so hardly copied and how much more surmountable. Still, entertaining, which is always half of what a director should expect of all creation.It will be for the next, Koldo.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/382

Red Stovall

Alatriste

muchocine

Alatriste is the tangible demonstration that in this country already we go dedicating us to do something else, I don't know, it calceta for example.

It is the Spanish of the year movie, as in 2005 was 'Torrente 3'. I am talking about the box office, of course. And if we talk about its quality as film because little better is that the messing of Santiago Segura, and no, not kidding. I would already like. The alleged crisis of Spanish Cinema is going to save two truño there is no where catch them. Because readers mine, 'Alatriste' is palpable proof that in this country already we go dedicating us to do something else, I don't know, sock for example. This film is not only a clear exponent of zero quality of our cinema. It is an invitation to any viewer with two fingers in front again not stepping over a movie theater to see a patriotic product. It is also an invitation for all those engaged workforce in this film in our country are thinking about change pofesión and not waste more time doing silly. what I'm being too hard? What will! What happens is that if the movie were American, I would therefore give birth without more and point, and what is best, I care a damn. But as it is ours (and of our will with second) I can not stay silent no more and confine myself to make a critique of the film without entering certain considerations that I think important. So much time complaining that in our country not we dare to make a blockbuster to the American with many media and such and which, with all the history we have and blah blah blah. and when is that there is the possibility of doing so (a good possibility I would say) and separate us put in tray an actor of the likes of Viggo Mortensen and some 22 million euros, over a minimally acceptable literary basis, I wonder how is it possible that made such shit?On his argument I won't talk. OS cogeis books that Arturo Pérez-Reverte has devoted to the character and comprobareis that something everyone has got to tell the story told in the film. A greatly confusing history never progresses and what is worse: isn't interesting at any time. What does Alatriste? What do the other characters? what it unites them? These and other questions may have answer but only halfway, because never ya que nunca queda is perfectly defined or explained what makes each character and its role in the film. Many come out, or rather because known actors interpret and so the public can say: "look, Pilar López de Ayala" (my daughter, who recommended you that you metieras here?).That little definition affects not only characters but the history. The central plot is quite diluted, either by the overwhelming artistic direction by the excess of characters or secondary frames radically hindering the narrative, as for example the love affairs between some of the characters. Apart from wasting time, they are not well displayed. Also I should say that the film is lost in historical data relating to famous paintings, which matter to us a cumin, because even the fact of wanting to convey the feeling that we have something big just in time to be carried out is achieved. This glut of information ends up getting tired of us, is how if policymakers thought that we weren't going to give an account of the exact time in which the film takes place. But vamoa see, if already at the beginning tells the year, and we repeat every few minutes: "one year later", "ten years later" and so on.Agustín Díaz Yanes it is not that the film is great, it is that there is still enormous. Unable to infer the correct rhythm, is more, sometimes gives the impression that there is no or rhythm; hold the entire film is truly soporific and ends deranging. There is no or slippages of rhythm, that is to say no. And when it comes time to be spectacular, the director shows that he can't shoot or a single battle or fight of swords. Everything is confusion and is very wildly displayed. The film can not boast of having many spectacular scenes, which continues to be a mistake, because when it focuses on their characters is total chaos. If I at least had more action, and would not be stopped both in useless, we would be talking about another movie without a doubt. But it is not.The actors work there for all tastes. Who takes the cake is obviously Viggo Mortensen, who only have to accuse him of a form of talking really strange and slightly damaging his interpretation. However, endorses the character and is used throughout the film by filling the screen, perhaps too, because of which there is no doubt is that the film is a vehicle for his showcasing integer, that everyone knows that this actor has come to work with us and focus on much, won't be the only time you approach here. The rest of the cast really passes straws to keep up. On the good side we have Javier House, actor who earn a lot over the years; Will Blanca Portillo, that if does not take Goya, do for 'Back'; Juan Echanove as an excellent Quevedo; Ariadna Gil, not because it is well, but because I to this actress forgive you all and it is always a joy seeing her on screen. And how not, Eduard Fernández, magnificent off-road actor that outboard what throw you.On the side of the bad guys we have to Eduardo Noriega, think anytime that we will say that we drink Schweppes; Elena Anaya, is not credible never; and on all Unax Ugalde, who at this point I already qualify as one of the worst actors of the Universal history. His character, vital in history, does not have the slightest entity in the hands of Ugalde, does not exist. The actor who only knows to put a face, yours is truly pathetic and ends round the general disaster.Good actors must add what was spent in production, to design there Yes the movie is perfect. Every penny of your budget is reflected on the screen, something is something. But obviously not arrived, that the rest are nothing more than a bunch of characters coming out left and right and reciting phrases which at times are ridiculous.A very bad film once again putting highlight and exposed the enormous artistic shortcomings of our film, which should be defending tooth and nail (never better said), but with films like this is impossible. To see what it takes to make fun of us in how much the movie is exported. At the moment the sense is of absolute casting, tomorrow will be sadness, because I repeat once again that the opportunity to do something big was unique and they have squandered her. And incidentally, it does not seem to be to make a series about the character, which would be the logical thing. Of course, they have been without money there this, there for a continuation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3957

Heitor Pan

Across The universe

muchocine

A film that I entertained without problems during their two-hour long movie, but ended up leaving me conflicting sensations. That Yes, I've done with the soundtrack.

The Beatles like to almost everyone. If not all the songs, I think that the world could appoint one enjoyment of the Liverpool quartet song, because if they are not the most well-known group in the history of music, them be missing very little. For that, in the meantime disk, so good lyrics and so much melody, it isn't difficult to get together a story by pulling on his discography. If we add to this good musicians and good interpreters, we will achieve a soundtrack worthy of listening, but do we get a great movie? So in this case, say that to me so it seemed only to ratos. "Across the universe" basically tells a story of love, but contextualizing it in a point in history Usamericana that allows the Director Julie Taymor ("Frida") to make an allegation against the war, full of buenrollismo. It all starts when Jude (name evident if we look for a male protagonist based on songs Beatleleras) Decides to leave his native Liverpool, to go in search of a father who has never known, to the other side of the pond. When he gets becomes friend of a typical charming gamberrete and, with the passage of time, he will find his sister (Lucy, equally appropriate name) the love of his life. Together live great experiences and tragedies, war of Viet Nam, the sexual revolution, anti-war demonstrations, the envy and administrations in the music world part starts in unbeatable way, putting us in the history of Jude in his new life, surrounded by his new friends, but towards the middle of the plot, the film takes dyes psychotropic substances of the experimental albums of the Quartet and becomes too unrealistic for my taste. With the entry of an enlightened Bono (of U2, not to be confused with the Spanish political) the movie enters a period of negative and distorted images paranoid and argument of madness that cuts a little the general line of the film. At that time I became too heavy and incoherent.Past experience with LSD, history returns to normal primordial, to finish with a dose of good feelings which, together with the soundtrack, leaves you with an irrepressible smile on the lips, as he gets into the drama of a heartbreaking way at any time, but that everything is treated in a smooth manner.Anyway, the strong point of the film, apart from the Beatles themselves, are the actors; a handful of young people, in their respective roles perfect and very solvent in interpretations of the songs. Evan Rachel-Wood, which had lost the track from the enormous and distressing "Thirteen", very expressive and immensely sweet, Jim Sturgess, the British cast member (why not get catch the British English?) and Joe Anderson, the macarrilla of the group, a triad of actors who will have to follow the track, as well as a handful of great singers and cameos that highten the film.In short, a film that I entertained without problems during their two-hour long movie, but ended up leaving me conflicting sensations. That Yes, I've done with the soundtrack.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4019

Javier G. Pasamón

Soy leyenda

muchocine

The tape of Lawrence seems a very sweetened version, optimist, glib and comercialoide ultimately from the excellent book by American author, which makes it something fully forgettable after leaving the room.

It is seen that we walk too far from the courage and the suggestion in the genre of science fiction / horror of the 1950s. The current guidelines that preside over the productions of the majors are exclusively of a commercial nature, without risk, more concerned to show and give an explanation to all that suggest and respect the intelligence of the Viewer. Films such as "The incredible shrinking man" by Jack Arnold proposed a serious look at human loneliness, isolation, the struggle for survival in a hostile environment and the value of lost everyday. The same Matheson - author of the novel, wrote the screenplay, won the freedom that they don't nowadays seem to give the producers and the result confirms, that possibly the best film adaptation of a book by Matheson, as well as an excellent example of great cinema made with few resources (such as much of the B series of yesteryear).Obviously, Francis Lawrence, has not had the same fortune that Arnold, since it has as writers - I think we can say it - two of the largest Hollywood churros, able to write huge jumbles in the form of libretto as "Poseidon", in the case of Mark Protosevich or "code Da Vinci", in the case of Akiva Goldsman, possibly the worst writer of USA for a server and regular collaborator of the execrable Ron Howard. Work with such useless has have been a mental torment for the good of Francis Lawrence, a filmmaker not as mediocre as a priori may think, since his work on the film, from my point of view, is decent (not very notable). That if, please run a thick veil on this thing called "Constantine" with bland-man Reeves.Si entered comparative between book and film, the film is as something really unattractive. Not only has lost all that anguish and terror of the novel, but also much of its meaning, in addition I do not see anywhere the fight psychological it stuns Neville. As in "The incredible shrinking man" in the novel the protagonist was the stranger, be "marginalized" and a killer for "new humanity". This is the step on the other side of the spectrum.The tape of Lawrence seems a very sweetened version, optimist, glib and the comercialoide dessert of the excellent book by the American author. Pessimistic novel nothing air is reflected in the tape. The Existentialist draught also seems to have disappeared from the map. Everything seems in the service of the FX (very good in terms of locations, very bad and totally failed in regard to infected), as well as containing any other scene out of place that clearly break the rhythm of the tape for example: those of hunting initial with the car at all milk (almost gives me something xD), moments "Shrek" and "Bob Marley", both certainly regrettable and pure gobs comic made in the principe de Bel-Air.En as in the end, what?, then falsely hopeful and nothing as chachi and "worship" of the novel. SPOILER that suicide Will Smith seemed almost to patriotic and penosete and a statement somewhat dangerous anti-11S, martyred to give life not to remove it, Yes, but beware, never occur at Neville as what it is: the last link of a strange and murderous race, but almost as a new Messiah salvador. END SPOILERTanto "The omega man" like this, assume two failures to adapt one of the best sci-fi horror written novels. Charlton Heston or Will Smith convinced as Neville (though I must admit that, although he hates the actor, Will Smith is more content than usual and is welcome).A churro patatero entertaining and enjoyable. There is already talk of sequel, I propose to leave Tomatito Bloom as cousin Neville brother, leaves just so something even worse.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/694

Mario

A scanner darkly

muchocine

Apart from the obvious moral, transcends a narrative of false appearances, whether personal or otherwise. Do we really know the person that sleeps beside us?

If there are really able to surprise you films, there is no doubt that A scanner darkly is one of them. Although the vaunted technique of interpolated rotoscoping (a sort of tool that allows you to draw on previously filmed real images) is already, in itself, quite unexpected; the least one can expect, is to find later, with a film of ci-fi not abusing (hardly used) of typical special effects or more crazy action sequences.A scanner darkly is essentially a film of characters, that, behind a curtain of black humor, reflects on issues so common such as loneliness or the prestancia of a one-man code of ethics.The plot revolves around Bob Arctor (played by the bland of Keanu Reeves, that rotoscoping makes a great favor) an agent antivicio that receives the mission to spy on their own friends, consumers of drugs of fashion: the substance D. Despite serious doubt, Bob agrees to infiltrate the world of junkies, closely linked, in the context of the movie, the war against terrorism. Do at the same time that substance D is seizing him, Bob will fall in love with a spectacular Donna Hawthorne (here the rotoscoping spare) that the most famous cleptómana of Hollywood, gives life and live a thousand situations? between comic and terrifying - ranging from the paranoid delusion to the most absurd situation.Richard Linklater directs the film with ex officio and knows very well administered doses of humor, so in almost no time lapses of attention. The idea behind the script, as always when talking about something that has to do with Philip k. Dick, is very original and interesting, with a final surprise of the more disturbing I have seen lately in the film.An excellent aspect is the approach to the world of drugs. The film derides until exhaustion of the scene of the consumption of these, both of the ridiculousness of the fight against them as of the unfortunate complacency of consumers (everything is parodiable, but this is more, if possible) and here is where can we find the strong point of the movie.As factors against perhaps I was on happy rotoscoping what need there? Linklater used it successfully (at least as regards promotion) in his previous film, Walking life. But on this occasion I wonder if the modernilla technique does not impose as an obstacle to the development of the tape.Although, as I said earlier, the comic moments are well managed, the movie leaves the vague feeling that might have come across. The spectacular bis comic of Robert Downey Jr. and Woody Harrelson is not squeezed to the maximum, and each sequence gives the impression you need another round of measures to stay perfectly adjusted. On the other hand, the story of Dick may not give for a feature film (the film is quite short) and some of their sequences appear lengthwise without.Finally, and despite some small details against, I think that A scanner darkly is a dignísima and original work of science film current fiction. That, apart from the obvious moral (if you drugs much you're asshole) transcends a narrative of false appearances, whether personal or otherwise. Do we really know the person that sleeps beside us?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/885

Jesus Lens

Borat

muchocine

Cinematically speaking is unclassifiable because, to tell their despicable and pathetic story, that dirty realism is required.

"Borat", say from the outset, has moments absolutely repugnant and its efforts to shake the consciences and sensibilities of the spectators, espoleando the lowest instincts of those Yankees of a foot, common and theoretically, Sacha Baron Cohen, putative father of the infected creature, won't hesitate to behave like a real pig, racist, Digimundo and misogynistic arrabalero dog of the lower estofa. And what you get with this? What do it? "Supposedly to drag in their romps through the mud to the cream of American society: feminists, Baptist clergy, the high society of a southern town, University students, rough cowboys, sellers of second-hand cars, sellers of weapons and, in the end, to the very same and recauchutada Pamela Anderson.""Borat" is an atypical road movie that attached to the emerging genre of the mockumentary, is breaking the box office American, possibly because it is acid and cruel reflection of a contradictory and complex society. the apparent simplicity, stupidity and cretinism mental of much of its inhabitants, perfectly represented by that individual have as President. And is that not as laugh at others misery, when they are so close, to feel comfortable and quiet with oneself.Now, if as experiment pseudosociológico, "Borat" can be curious and striking, cinematically speaking is unclassifiable that tell their despicable and pathetic story, it requires that dirty realism, its planning based on a single camera that pursues the supposed journalist Kazakh everywhere, of his neglect in the details and all the dandruff that oozes the film.What is very clear is that the comedian Sacha Baron Cohen has managed to shape a character with popular pull very media, we do not know if it will have continuity (and success) in the future. It must be acknowledged that the 82 minutes of "Borat" are passed in a sigh, that they get tired or bored, that give rise to reactions in the viewer and giving for awhile to talk after the film. But certainly not going to revolutionize or history of cinema nor that of sociology.Music deserves special mention, a soundtrack full of the hottest sounds of bands zíngaras from Eastern Europe. "You can hear songs like"Ederlezi"and tunes of the famous Bulgarian voices in a lively étnico-musical medley that puts the festive counterpoint to much cutrez and dandruff.""Borat" claims the power of humor as a tool of social criticism, is politically incorrect and, as mentioned, gives rise to reactions in the stalls. It is not little. But it is not for burst lockers, the truth. Is symptom of any disease, diagnosed in our country after the success of torrent? We will continue to pay attention to Borat and Sacha, to see what happens to them in the near future.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1293

José A. Peig

Europa

muchocine

Some may find a pedantry, as often happens in any work of author online free and avant-garde European cinema. But that only tell the corny and the ignorant.

Art - referred to under a process of conscious ontological self-assertion - takes a giant step everytime an artist creates a universe. No sense devote life to art without beforehand, recognizing that this is the most noble and transcendent of human condition facet. Human potential reaches its highest goal in the creative act, that perspire thinking soul by means of which the creator projects itself into a unique world. That is, gives us a piece of something own, something that can not be felt or understood in the conventional level of communication. "In this way, the non-transferable becomes transferable, and art, while communication Act, becomes a path of brotherhood between the sentient beings and creators.""Europe", Lars Von Trier, is a single object by its meaning and its form. The fundamental idea of the base text is an immersion into the depths of the mind of the omniscient Narrator made explicit through voice-over (Max Von Sydow in the original). Are hidden in the mind of Trier fears, ghosts and concerns those who are parading disguised as bitter tears for the European continent and its unhappy history recent and present. Although the plot is situated in the nazi Germany in post-war situations, words, gestures, the frames of conspiracy, hatred and irrationality that motivate different entities involving the essence of the human characters, are elements of the immediate present, passing through the war in the Balkans or any latent conflict between "our" and "others" that still threaten the peaceful coexistence of parts of Europe (Ireland)(, Basque country). Therefore, a part of the thematic content consists of an elegiac crying around universal conflicts from a contemporary framework.In another layer of content, appears a reason constant in the Filmography of Danish filmmaker, the figure of the lost innocent among the forest of conflict, victim of the interests of others, known as Leo Kessner. It is to the same time, protagonist and impartial observer, realization of the consciousness of the Viewer, which is being guided by the voiceover according the journey proposed by Trier. A trip full of shadows and ghosts that atosigan with his role of corrupt characters or slaves of their murder or complicity with the agencies involved in the war.This is another of the basic constituents of the content: its major dreamlike, own an atmosphere imagined by Franz Kafka, and here Trier sets the pulse of your camera in a visual space that contains the maximum possible information for the purpose: the depth of field and the different profiles to scene management always seeks to Leo Kessner position at a point of neutrality with respect to the remaining set, but, above all, emphasizes the feeling of drowning between harassment, imperatives and the deception perpetrated by this set of entities Kafkianos.En as to the writing, the script collects various thematic and emotional still: satirical or sarcastic tones, melancholy, disappointment, Apocalypse, paranoia, love, unrequited love, appreciation, contempt. It's fascinating to magnificently structured are all that amount of tones and Lars Von Trier succeeds through a simple story of love and disappointment in an atmosphere of ideological hostilities, nothing original in this sense. The significance of Europe lies not in the history, but the how is addressed: the visual imagination of Trier is evident in many levels, close-ups and the use of chromatic resources to create different dimensions narratives within the same story and the same scene, which occurs in a deliberate ambigüedad-confusión between the real and the Unrealthus accentuating the dream-like nature of the representation. The final destruction is preceded by tensions within psychological Leo Kessner, which exceeded by the banality and stupidity perceived peers, decides that, at the end and after the genocide is the only way out, following the thread most turbulent of the concerns of Trier, as we saw with regard to "Dogville".In view of all this, "Europe" comes to be an intellectual and creative of its author, capricious game in the choice of themes and forms used, huge variety, but not last its construction and intention, which is the communicate a universe of images stemming from his nightmares and the worst autobiographical memories, organized and represented by Dante allegory on the conflicts in our modern civilization and about the dangers of incommunicado detention and loneliness. Rather, the danger of misunderstanding, which is the factor that can make, any of us, in a desperate escape, take the decision to activate the pump that gives way to the horror. Finishing, and in response to your great qualities in the order theme (for complex topics with an effective structure), visual polychromy in keeping with the multifaceted narrative and emotional States representation, to be equipped with a personal stamp which it makes a unique piece, and considering that the art should produce genuine works, works which is said in colloquial expression: "only he could a work like that", i.e. that part of the idiosyncrasies of the author is given us through his aesthetic production (gives us, in a way, a vision of the world which enriches and extends from the own spectator, why has much more intellectual value that limited to offer a vision Mannerist or giving, i.e. a vision not creative and fossilized), as occurs in the speech of Spielberg in "Saving private ryan", which is nothing more than a mere copy of the American State speech. (Art is much more than that.) from "Images and words" we are left with no choice but to the qualify to "Europe", unquestionable and absolute, as a work of art.Some may find a pedantry, as often happens in any work of author online free and avant-garde European cinema. But that only tell the corny and the ignorant.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2997

Bruji

Gal

muchocine

It is incredible what encourages thinking world fiction "without claiming it". It is not all the men of the Chair, but a bet, when less, interesting Spanish cinema, in which no shortage nor patriotic peaks or chillingly ridiculous monologues.

With an argument that exceeds the best American political thriller, (which would have given Oliver Stone for being Spanish!), this production of world fiction, focuses in journalistic investigations that uncovered a scandal "without precedent in the history of democracies", according to its makers; who has been curiously, called her "Gal".GAL is, indeed, a package consisting of the story, the film and how did, does not rule out the possibility of becoming a trilogy, so Paco Ariza could become more famous than Torrente.Evidentemente, if the such Ariza says in the interview that "there is much more" and that "more" is not included in the film, it is because Melchor Miralles (a charming gentleman where halle) could be preparing the second part, Gal: the story Interminable.El story airs during two consecutive days prior to the premiere and maximum audience, by a regional channel schedule, and its objective is basically gutting the film with surgical precision.There are two fascinating moments, derived from the lines of research followed by journalists and that lead to a revealing zulo, as well as to inform the alleged lover of the peculiar servant. Similarly, Paul, director, tells some interesting conversations with certain politicians.I am inclined to think that the "evisceration" is done without ill will, presupposing that nationwide recalls the ins and outs of the case, but forgetting that it does more of twenty years were many Spaniards that we faction, or paid taxes or read the press, having no age to do so. Of course, also came to the conviction that knowing the silhouette of the argument and each and every one of the details of the Fund, since it makes no sense paying 5,80 turkeys in the film.The six million euros invested in this production, translates into a modest picture, with certain dyes of television series, lousy photography and improved atmosphere. However, we are facing a well told story, impeccably simple structure and screenplay loaded with clichés of the genre, which makes the mistake of insinuating a sentimental roll that is beside the point, nor offers attractive to the footage, nor provides a pepper to the plot.Over the projection and, once again, because of the Ripper story, my movie fan memory flies to the Olympic Games in the year 72, makes me remember how the Government of Israel split with the command of Munich and forces me to think that the members of the Spanish secret services do not have a hair of ready. Meanwhile, the historical memory I shake when it is fact that Juanito, the Minister, enters the prison for being the organizer of the anti-terrorist band... I remain convinced (what delusional!) that was due to an issue with the reserved funds.With a Natalia Verbeke, at times, incredible and José García credible at times, the sole protagonist is only the building appears "seven years later", in a stunning foreground and retaining his true name; a curious aspect of a film in which Pedro is called Pablo and Vicente called Louis. It is not all the men of the Chair, but a bet, when less, interesting Spanish cinema, in which no shortage nor patriotic peaks or monologues chillingly ridiculous, far removed from that "Let justice be done, though open land" the unforgettable JFK.The making keeps me awake until four in the morning, but I must admit that it is worthwhile for the question posed: "what is hidden behind this film?.." Of course, when I start to think that this is the Da Vinci Code and that there must be some strange message that I has been overlooked, the voiceover reaches the conclusion that "the only thing that is hidden behind the movie is the desire to overcome the success of critics and audiences of Wolf". Is here where I understand that "honest subjectivity" which speaks Miralles (a charm of Lord ever there), but I am disappointed as movie fan, because I expected a lot more from him as a producer. In any case, I don't feel I quiet. Suddenly, seeing the movie, I get to think that any negotiations with the terrorist group is unthinkable, even for the sake of a peace process; that if there was a democratic Government that lied, this may become again, if it is that it is not producing, at this time; and that those who were able to uncover the greatest scandal in this country when all denied, they may be true trail of another conspiracy, far-fetched as it sounds today. It is incredible what prompts me to think World fiction, without claiming it.But as mine is the cinema, what interests me most is that he has written of Gal who said that the last movie by Oliver Stone was "television film". Whatever the case, I hope their sincerity, because there is no Diario 16, which was that said goodbye.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/628

Berto

Corrupción en Miami

muchocine

A movie quite good, without reaching the level of their previous masterpieces, but which ultimately is a new film by Michael Mann, not a film adaptation of the mythical series Miami Vice.

Michael Mann was producer and creator of the mythical series created in 1984 and was a success throughout the world, and since his intention was to bring an adaptation of that series to the big screen. It is now in 2006 in which embarks on this risky adaptation, that if, with many works to his back that turned the project into something more than a simple adaptation to earn money, because Mann is notable above all for its forms and his sobriety to tell great stories.For the choice of the protagonists has vibrant Jamie Foxx, star that is proving to be a real off-road in the field of performance and grows as it is premiering films, and Collin Farrell, actor that although it promises enough, still has not had a role that enshrined it in the same way as teammate in this production. That if these characters share with the original only his name, because from the locker room, way to act and others does not remember anything to the popular series.Is at this point where you can see the great failure, or success of the film according to tastes of the Viewer, because the film Miami Vice only relates to the series the name both itself and its protagonists? If had changed you the name well could have passed for a 100% movie style Michael Mann, Collateral plan or Heat and not to remind us at all to the series from which drinks (in theory) their sources.The visual style of the Michael Mann permeates the entire film is impeccable. Well shot action scenes and an argument quite careful, as already demonstrated in the above Heat and Collateral, although if it is placed is a script too focused on what he says and not the action, thing which at times makes a little heavy film, especially if we are expecting a style more than action plan shootings and persecution as passed on the series.As for the two actors to my I liked quite in their roles of Sonny Crockett and Ricardo Tubbs, although the less convinced me was Collin Farrell, more than anything by the elongated shadow of Don Johnson, although comparisons apart is not bad for all the footage. As revelation of the film highlight John Ortiz, right-hand man of the bad very bad Luis Tosar, which seems totally lost throughout the film. Unconvincing seems Li Gong as wife of Luis Tosar, seems both exoticism more than enough and they could have sought a Latin fixed had convinced a lot more, besides the fact that the couple Farrell-Gong is totally artificial and I find no justification in the plot, think that she is it they could have skipped completely.Ultimately, movie quite good, without reaching the level of their previous masterpieces, Collateral and Heat, but which ultimately is a new film by Michael Mann, not a film adaptation of the mythical ochentera series Miami Vice.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2550

Pruden Rodríguez

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

Follow the free fall of the poor OGRE. For my taste it is the worst of the three parties with difference. A loose, recommended film for only boring adults and children.

Follow the free fall of the poor OGRE. There was an irreverent, crude and sarcastic Shrek which are only shadows. There was a donkey tontorrón, heavy and graciosete which only is trace, and something similar could be said of Fiona (never had too much joke, everything is said) and even el gato con botas, which becomes inseparable from our monstrous friend friend.With Shrek the third is definitely lost the magic of this tale, which should be already finished. The writers stretch and stretch, probably at the request of those who smell and handle the money, but no longer know where they go. Resources have been exhausted and the characters are becoming softer, less striking, more. boring. In addition, this time there is no new characters. at least none that stand out, which will bring something new. History, on the other hand, is relatively entertaining, but very focused to a child audience. Ran the Tinker and any other output tone. Everything is politically correct, no animal suffered damage while it is filming this movie and blah blah blah. Anyway, that adult you can entertain the plot, but that has never been the major asset of Shrek. Genuine, authentic in this tale of ogres, was the absurd gag, the nonsense, the bizarre situation. All that, in my opinion, began to lose in the second installment, and finally dies in the third.Anyway, for my taste is the worst of the three parties with difference. A loose, recommended film for only boring adults and children (was my case). Anyway, but it has nothing to do, if your partner or your children are determined, see it. Not bored, and this is already something. Pity that the film has made 7?. If her he had seen in DVD perhaps would not disgusted me.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3355

Andrés Pons

Supersonic man

muchocine

It is shabby-salchichera copy of superman has the worst special effects ever seen, the worst picture and a lower score that a success of chenoa.

One of the first films of the emblematic director cannot be clearly almost the worst but at the same time more fun. It is shabby-salchichera copy of superman has the worst special effects ever seen, the worst picture and a lower score that a success of chenoa. Among the interpreters that they walk in a ridiculous general highlights CAMERON MITCHELL "Night of TERROR, six women to the murderer" and FRANK BRAÑA "Present in all films of the director". Is it is one of the largest ever shot frika and to see it has to be completely hanging or with very low mental attributes. One of these films to spend one afternoon of beer and colleagues better, for else better refrain. 5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3325

Andrés Pons

Adiós pequeña, adiós

muchocine

A film as murky as full of elegance that transmits the best virtues of classic film noir

BEN AFFLECK seemed willing to become one of the worst actors in the history of the cinema. Really disastrous performances in DAREDEVIL or PEARL HARBOR among others, they showed their great lack of charisma and an inability to convey the slightest emotion.Apparently has other quite remarkable qualities, not evil in the work of writer defends himself "Oscar included by the indomitable Will hunting" but it turns out that you hid a huge talent in the direction.After spending the first controversy because the script of the film is modelled to a popular real case which of course this morbid in a great advertising can take advantage. Outside of tabloid scandals, this is one of these debuts soñados by any filmmaker.Perhaps we have one of the best police in recent times, a drama dry narrated with enormous strength, outstanding technically with a script full of surprises and characters are not what they seem at first. A film so murky and full of elegance that transmits the best virtues of classic film noir.Obviously helps some excellent interpreters, since MORGAN FREEMAN Veterans "Still as God" ED HARRIS "The hours" or the younger brother of the director that has much higher than his elder brother interpretative characteristics. Performs double with the also notable the cowardly to mato Jesse james postulating of form is his step to stardom.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1905

Paula Zurita

Inland empire

muchocine

Although the story is a collage of images that relate to each other as in a bad dream or hallucinations, the audiovisual part puzzled. Levels, weak color and darkness, the little sharpness of images, the movement of the camera, music. All with a digital camera who seduces, but crashes.

Fly from Barcelona to Egypt, read 'Love and pedagogy' de Unamuno or watch two movies of Antena3 a Sunday afternoon. That and a thousand more things can be in three hours. Also pass them in the cinema watching the latest film by David Lynch. In the reformed Maldà or the Icaria in original version with subtitles that distract. A challenge. Although the film was released two months ago in Spain, called considerations.After 'Lost Highway' (1997), the noventera series 'Twin Peaks' and 'Mulholland Drive' (2001), 'Inland Empire' (2006) is the normal evolution of a devious and strange film director. The name, again, is not more than a toponym. In the Venetian premiere 'Inland Empire' was everything a little: criticism and applause. The director also gave much explanation about the meaning of his creation. The only thing certain is digital video recording. The rest is paranoia and anxiety. And what is the story. David Lynch nor the actors know this. He was doing little by little. Intiutivamente. It seems an extreme provocation that screams in anguish. From the first scene, but not until the last, there is concern. The film could be summarized as: two actors star in the remake of a love story, but fiction confuses with reality. "It seems the script for our movie", says the actress to her lover. Does not realize that at that time were acting. A frivolous description for a complicated history. In addition, there is a woman crying while watching the television sometimes desintonizada and others that see the same movie scenes. A metapelícula. And the Poles, is evident from the co-production with Poland, fulfilled various functions, although all unexplained. Strange characters that distort the life of the actress are: her husband, the neighbouring etc. There are also unlikely scenes of three conejos-burros that keep disjointed conversations. While a plate, two others, the she, and are sitting on a couch. Seems like a play. And the Polish whores who are the old lovers and at the same time the whores of Los Angeles. Finally, there is a linear argument and many scenes are left without explanation. But although the story is a collage of images that relate to each other as in a bad dream or hallucinations, the audiovisual part astonishes. Levels, weak color and darkness, the little sharpness of images, the movement of the camera, music. All with a digital camera who seduces, but crashes. It is not difficult to get out of the movie with depression. If 'Inland Empire' has been a bad day, intenará wrecking is it to make it one of the worst of the year. All despite the end of the film which seeks to create a bit of normality. There are a father, the Polish husband of the actress, with his wife, which cried while watching pictures on the TV, and a child. Someone me whispers in your ear: are hallucinations of women because the characters living near a chemical plant and all were a bit touched. Perhaps, I don't know. Then, to encourage the audience tired of anguish and incomprehension, come the credits with a song that includes dance. But I don't want to describe it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/684

Rafa Ferrer

Infiltrados

muchocine

Well directed, best scripting, and with a bittersweet moment that like, and much in the stalls. a more than remarkable Thriller, which reconciles me with the director of Italian origin.

Not occurred to me see "The Aviator" and is that, with all that I spoke and the times that I've met her in satellite channel, I have withdrawn, while having a copy on DVD of the film, I ventured to see her, and say this and so I start my comment of "The Departed" (I refuse to call it by the title in Spanish), order to make my small fight with the director of Queens.Es, this remake of "Infernal Affairs" all one wager well directed film better interpreted, and with a bittersweet moment that like, and much in the stalls (towards Looooong time that was not a room where not cabiera or a PIN), on the other hand, both Damon and DiCaprio are one more than substantial performance, and see that, neither are my devotion santo, although, as we know, that takes the cat to the water is Nicholson, who with their presence on screen, from the first minute of footage, one enjoys as a child with a caramel from each of their appearances histríonicas; the weakest, perhaps, because so little that appears in the footage is Mark Walberg, and is that it is difficult to assume his role on screen, without emitting a sound of laughter, a face, beautiful by the way, to discover, thought me of Vera Farmiga, the girl on the film (complicated its role in a tape where "the prevailing male" takes the lead).On the other hand, and as only negative note, it would be excessive violence, with which Martin narrates the events that are happening in 2: 30 H. footage (which never suffer from heaviness, learn other directors.). Finally, a more than remarkable Thriller, which reconciles me with the director of Italian origin.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4360

Ivan Villamel

Rec

muchocine

Notable and innovative in a deconstructed industry such as the Spanish, fresh (which not original) and it represents one sample rather than the good fantasy film not attends media or budgets, but the imagination of its creators.

After his triumphant passage through International Festival of Sitges 2007, harvesting up to 5 awards, comes to the conventional screens the latest proposal by Homeland terror, in this case addressed to two hands by Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza, in an atypical history in your proposal but extremely conventional in its concept.The idea of directing a film, and as well as low budget as a whole may seem initially something strange and abnormal, but taking into account that Balagueró is a filmmaker who has shown its great values in the creation of terrifying atmosphere, with a large force in the sunset scene and the creation of moments of pure and simple horror, and Plaza is a most gifted director for the narrative progression than those moments of claw, the choice seemed completely right. Looking back on the career of Balagueró we find a series of films, that despite being irregular in its vast majority (IMHO his best film, remains his directorial debut "the nameless"), such as the failed "Darkness" or the more than interesting, but not round, "Fragile" and the tv-movie "to enter to live". For its part square offered works such as "The second name" and "Romasanta", both very significant but lacking claw narrative as I said before, proving something distant to the Viewer by the lack of adherence to the history, in the main fault of his film, which in this [REC] seems to have been solved.The story could not be more simple, accompanied by a team of reporters by your camera, and a journalist on a routine night a team of firefighters attending a building in the Centre of Barcelona, proving to be something not expected, and causing a series of events that cause a staggered more terrifying violence.During the footage, one of the strengths of the film lies in the realistic tone of the reactions of the characters, all of them are well shown in their routine daily lives, showing the reactions of all fresh and naturally before the series of events that lie ahead, something that, given that this is a film in which the creators themselves have acknowledged that they gave much freedom actors in improvidar their reactions, and even some hyperrealistic not knowing that awaited them in the filming of each scene is utterly commendable and one of the great successes of the film.On the other hand, the work after the cameras of Balagueró and Plaza only dislumbra rarely, leaving passing history in a natural way and without interference, also remarkable thing, especially when certain filmmakers strive always leave their brand while history does not require.Logically in a proposal and it would thus speak of the script be absurd because everything is limited to events that take place naturally, giving the sensation followed guidelines little slaves of a script written or at least detailed. But all this is not to say that why should there be a narrative progression, and here is where fails slightly REC, the history is a constant climax, and that does not contribute to the narrative development of history, i.e., its main virtue, it is to keep in a constant and churlish tension throughout the story, by providing it with an exacerbated realismtangible physical, and so he almost attacks the screen and the viewing part of the spectators, turns against because there comes a time in which, with the exception of the last bright 20 mínutos, the story becomes something expected, both in its history a series of scares that the Viewer already expected, although always in tension, that is undeniable.It also has a certain tone of black humor, as by the character of reporter interviews the inhabitants of the building, in which give rein to instincts as the racism towards Chinese residents, or a ruthless vision of programmes of Chronicles of events, through this immoral and arrogant reporter somewhat embodied in a remarkable manner by Manuela Velasco (not in vain)(it has exercised a similar work for television in real life).Perhaps another flaw of the film, and that if that already enters the taste of a server the classical narrative, consists of this constant movement of camera just for a little lightheaded and provoke a sense of confusion, I imagine that search.Much has been influences of another film genre which has had much impact lately, the first film of J.A.Bayona on haunted houses and spirits of ultratumba (excellent in my opinion but burdened somewhat by the clichés of the genre, as I commented in his day), but they are not less references to other films in REC, but that if, perhaps go more unnoticed, or are more tolerated by the general public because they are less popular. To start the creators themselves have acknowledged the influence (copy would say I see both proposals) a small amateur video posted on the internet, and that it is available in media as ephemeral as Youtube, on a supposed angel fallen in a rural area of our country, and this is evident in the final sequence. Other obvious influences, the second part of "Demons" by Lamberto Bava, with the zombie-infested apartment, or other various and typical references such as "The night of the living dead". Has been even the influence of that little exceptional work on the mechanisms of fear and the popular mythology that was the essential "The Blair Witch Project" (still misunderstood by many that have failed to see its symbolism), but in this case only the texture of amateur recording could find its similarity with that, while the film Myrick and Sanchez was all subtlety and pure symbolismin ECN uses the medium to create a palpable reality without excuses.In short, notable film, an orgíastico climax of violence during 80 mínutos introduces us squarely in the form of violation media in the reality of a series of characters trapped by pure terror that seizes your neighborhood, a work that with their great virtues, and in spite of slight defects, becomes a fresh and alive sample of good horror moviesAlthough it is less frightening, except its bright last 20 minutes, than it had wanted sell us in this video about reactions of staff in particular well near film festival and that so many awards granted to this film.Notable and innovative in a deconstructed industry such as the Spanish, fresh (which not original) and it represents one sample rather than the good fantasy film not attends media or budgets, but the imagination of its creators.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3273

Oscar Cantero

Mandíbulas 2

muchocine

A hodgepodge that seems rather a remake of the first part the continuation of a story already in itself was a bit boring.

I admit that I like to see from time to time some of those movies that no one expects to be masterpieces, but that he presumed some ability to entertain, using large predators and other many arguments based on the fantasy combined with the action.Although, as I have already said, one is aware that it will not enjoy a classic, the truth is that they at least houses the expectation to have a good time, facing a script more or less coherent, contemplate a few credible special effects and, why not say it, perhaps see some unknown and nice actress begins in the challenging world of the celluloid.Unfortunately, in JAWS 2, there is not the slightest trace of motion picture decency, therefore seems more a continuation, a remake of the first part. The characters are modelled from its predecessor, without the slightest novelty or modification. Something similar happens with the script, since the course of the tempos is repeated in a shameful way, without adding anything new.Also worthy of mention that strange mixture between action-horror with a touch of comedy zafia and insubstantial much like on the other side of the Atlantic, but which find me abhorrent and grotesque.Nothing taste nor nothing to enjoy, as he finished this chestnut, I walked bad-tempered to the bar from the beach below House, living, unfortunately for his faithful, his last days of the season.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3427

José A. Peig

Supersalidos

muchocine

A juvenile comedy that laughs at adolescence to discuss it with great sensitivity.

It was not easy to imagine a review of soul beat through the new icons geeks, and much less combine rightly boorishness testosterónica of a teen comedy with an initiatory trip fun that, indeed, he communicates the essence of an underground tragedy. In recent weeks had received "warnings" that had reached the charts a work of art disguised as - with much intelligence - tontorrona comedy for flat minds, awakening my - so far - no interest for this creature. After the screening and the implementation in common we believe that it should not give excessive significance to a product designed for the amusement of the púberes but that piano piano, ends up nailing a hurtful estocada at the heart of much of the adult spectators. Say that the film is a profound critique of our society that hides the protest against (our) culture of the botellón, or has enough potential to renew as not only a film genre, but the same style of life of our young generations, overshadowed the loss of values and the desperate flight forward to which are forced in a world that has subverted the hierarchy and respect for elders. The only alternative - if already you can not grow in company of parents and teachers - is to seek the identity and self-discovery learning to survive in a hostile world, drifting along with the confusion prevailing (!)What world disgust).! The writers used the satirical tone to reflect our society. This society we see represented on the screen is not the Royal Society, but hyperbolic cartoon that brings together some factors of great importance in the life of the teenager who lives in a society (post) modern and tech. While it is true that the delusional stroke with which the writers build profiles of the characters and situations not allows to produce a faithful reproduction of the society, the strong construction of dialogues gives rise to director Greg Mottola use the expressive possibilities of the satire applied to the affective and obseso-sexual of the adolescent universe to talk about society. What the difference, therefore, the teenage comedy content without any artistic merit, is here used in the main stratum figuration - with which the public can have a hilarious time - to develop (in a UN texto implícito) a process of awakening; the awakening of sexuality, discover the value of friendship in its breadth of conditions, discover that in life you will be not always appreciated for what you are, but for what it aparentas be, or the "pleasure" of breaking the law and order (in one of the scenes most controversial, we see the exaltation and the revelry at the sight of a burning police litrona and balazos.luego car will be returning to this.)The soul of the three protagonists is a soul beatnik, losers who get involved in a crazy night race in search of affection (don't know if Jack Kerouac would like this film, but without him it would not exist). Specifically, the character known as Seth (Jonah Hill), is the pre-adolescent nerd equivalent to Dean Moriarty, beggar bocazas that hides in the background, the sadness of the helpless. Fogell is the archetypal freak that holds the tension in the confrontation with the world that is strange as the world is for him. Evan, counterpoint to the intelligent and normal boy. Three boys without friends and without any social success. And yet one of the things that will learn at the end of the road is that it is not the same having social success to be loved and that, sometimes, you have to choose between two paths. Alcohol makes the intercourse, but distorts the sincere expression of feelings. Or that never you know your best friend as well as the crucial moments. It would appear that this film has no script. Interpretations are unexpected transparency because the actors interpret themselves, having understood perfectly the role played, each of the three contributes to the excellent construction of characters, depicting feelings and obstacles concerning the immaturity to all, to a greater or lesser extent, have gone. Mention aside for the couple of policemen accompanying Fogell on his journey of discoveries, which hold most of the satirical burden and are the element that breaks the rules. In the key scene, Fogell, with the complicity of the two policemen and after a delirious scene that becomes exaltation of reckless driving, contemplates the patrol car on fire. And act followed, holds in his hands his first gun as if it was a rite of passage. The conclusion of the scene, with Fogell excited at the sight of the fire that consumed the car, is the moment that best exemplifies the unorthodox nature of the film; Yes, comrades, a tontorrona comedy would not solve the scene with this harshness, that final silence. (talked us to the boy sitting in the armchair next to made logical prediction, thinking that I was watching a movie to use: you will now see, shoot and falls of ass).Forgive the "wildcard", can not help it. Say that, after that smile, a tear. Exaltation of violence?. Are Seth, Evan and Fogell a faithful portrait of what is happening in reality?. Us worried about emerging youth violence? At least we know that Fogell is becoming "man" according to learn how to paste puffs cigarette, have fun with the driving reckless hitting fire to a car and then riddling it without him shaking the pulse. Do they need our teenagers do these things to feel loved?. Yes, better still if you goodbye spree classmates with their hands in handcuffs accompanied by two cops who take you to the station.In conclusion, it is the natural and precise way to view situations which makes that the characters have that emotional impact from the base of the simplicity of things which are real as life itself; the flat end of the escalator going down while Seth loses sight of his best friend, as waiting for something disrupts the goodbye to happen. Pure and simple friendship, homosexual feelings, or a constant in the lives of all those who know that grow is to say goodbye to many things that you love. In any case, a sad and intimate look at the world of adolescence and the misfits, and perhaps also, criticism of the dogmas that define social success as Candida ages: drinking alcohol to be more "cool", to demonstrate some type of violence against the forces of order and against the law to be more "interesting", the bias which hinders the proper understanding of friendship and sexual relations in a youth comedy that laughs at adolescence to discuss it with great sensitivity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3384

Ana Belén Pacheco

Matrimonio Compulsivo

muchocine

Compulsive marriage is another of those tapes that will end up at the bottom of the memory and perhaps with the passage of time is mixed with all her classmates and then disappear in the immensity of the bleary-eyed comedy.

If I am a sadistic. If it had to know of before. There are two things that I love in a comedy: one is the regia Peter Farrelly and Bobby Farrelly or what is the same: the Farrelli brothers. I recognize that only a couple of gags in his early films made me laugh but there ended my short and intense romance with them. Secondly, Ben Stiller. Possibly there are only another actor that irritating me so much as he (use euphemistic way actor) and that is his colleague Adam Sandler. Some consider that the problem of Ben Stiler is that he has not been a role to its "interpretive level". I tremble to think what you can do this guy to a good movie and pray sincerely so that it will not happen ever. The thing is that in spite of that I remain true to my principles and see every movie that any of these individuals removed only for the pleasure of discovering that he has not changed the dynamics and still do not find the point. Profanity, vacuos comic blows and absurd blows and cheap eschatology laugh jokes. More of the same. Not have surprised me this time with this small slapstick with little interest from the point of view of the script. Seems that the big players of comedy has become older and young people still cannot meet their place arguments rotate during a season on the tedious double world: Casar you with me, until that cure Nos Separe, Os Declaro husband and husband, and the latter seems to indicate that the public responds quite well so Dios caught us confessed to withstand a good batch of silly comedies about the joys and woes of the sacred sacrament of marriage. As well, I have to say that in marriage compulsive (whose title, once translated painfully into Spanish only charged sense at the end of the tape) a pretty stale Ben Stiller decides to marry a girl just know moved by the desperate feeling that everyone lives in couple to her around. It will be on the honeymoon trip when he will discover that his girlfriend is a little psychopath and will fall in love with another perfect unknown. With so little consistent raw is normal that film makes water everywhere only covered in the interpretative capabilities of the actors (as I mentioned are not of my tea). Why compulsive marriage is another of those tapes that will end up at the bottom of the memory and perhaps with the passage of time is mixed with all her classmates and then disappear in the immensity of the bleary-eyed comedy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2074

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Keane

muchocine

Intimate Chronicle of a mental imbalance growing dramatic intensity and aureolada of a fluid style suspense plot. A tiny masterpiece that will give that talk.

Anguish: this is the word. We can, in any case, find nouns that say the same thing, but otherwise. Despair. Impotence. Keane also is schizophrenia. We can, in any case, find nouns that say the same thing, but otherwise. Paranoia. Madness. Life can be wonderful, as vocingla the repetitive and weary commentator of football in the sixth, but life can be a mess, impossible to endure suffering. This is what Lodge H. Kerrigan has done: filming the suffering, give visual content to an idea that has bothered to any creator in the wide and long history of human feelings and emotions. Dispenses with all accessory for printing the story the necessary fluidity and the Viewer is not distracted in reasoning about how it happened or disquisition on the relevance of go to this or another method that illuminate the research: what is what happens? Keane, the troubled protagonist, has lost his daughter in the metro station. Everything else is the titanic effort to find it, but the pessimism lastra any option of success. During much of the footage, it seems that the task is impossible. That the girl will not be found. Keane is also mentally ill, a being that we can not always ask to act with exemplary; a being of which we are not even sure that have clear what really is happening. In this sense, Kerrigan elevates the status of the subjective work of art because there are moments in the film that we feel Keane and lose the North of reality wanting to (albeit mentally, fictitiously) convince us that it is not true. Desolation, disappointment, sadness of Keane make fatigue the city, contaminate your dirty supply of drugs, sex and confusion. This is the price to pay for the mistake he has made. Because nothing of what Keane is it is fun or is nowhere near that can lead you to the hardly imaginable happy ending that, ultimately, we all want.Not all is madness and Vertigo. The hell of the search consent meek breaks: places for the abandonment, backwaters where Keane finds himself as never never thought to find. Then reality scraped ROAR this soft surface of pure feelings. The noise returns it to the infamous territory of blame.The glory is for Damian Lewis, an actor in State of grace, which makes plausible his risky role, which do not have any time to break and where camera rummages in his emotional intimacy as a fine scalpel which diseccionase with cumbersome neatness stretch marks of mind, his go map of feelings.He also mentioned the meritorious performance of Abigail Breslin, the girl of little Miss Sunshine, which gives a counterpoint of verisimilitude to a story that's so simple, produces the feeling of being false. Nothing of the sort: Keane have a formidable exploration of the troubled soul, but also traces (and of very high quality) film of the most genuine suspense that obvious not the usual apparatus of enigmas capable of changing the course of history and do work out in several places. I insist on recommending this movie in this tsunami of film sequels that leave the viewer completely stranded on the tedium. A small masterpiece.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/746

Alberto Concepción

Saw 3

muchocine

Saw 3 is more of the same. Blood, suspense, more blood... and final tension (already feature). But it does not disappoint at all.

Two years ago, premiered in theaters a film budget, that virtually no one knew and whose fue.excelente result. He not only raised much more of what it cost, but that we returned (finally!) the 'horror' film lovers a genre that many had by unrecoverable. 'The massacre of Texas', 'I know what you did last summer'. and other stupid American movies, without any script, suspense and only with topicazos everywhere, to scare us or try us.The franchise went forward, and in what way: an end to the most original and a well achieved plot constituted a few real good strengths of a tape that even hoped so successful. 'Word of mouth' helped a lot in attracting followers, it was more than likely a second part. That Yes, had not seen very rewarded by critics, although in reality, it seems to be film critic implies you like deep films, not know or to assess aspects of those that are not intended to but entertain, keep you in suspense and teach what others don't is atreven.¿Y what we have now? Saw 3 is basically more of the same. Blood, suspense, more sangre.y final tension (already feature). Is it bad to be repetitive? In this case not: the vast majority of viewers again looking for what they liked the original and its sequel, they do not want peace and harmony. want gore scenes, desagradables.y enjoy the desired outcome. And in this sense, Saw 3 does not disappoint you: is no better that the first part, but a worthy sequel, which I doubt will cease to delight lovers of the saga.It is possible that on this occasion the plot is not so original as in the past, although it is probably more complex than those. There are fewer participants, but further explanation (pay attention to various details). There are less genius, but am not disappointed. At all. Even knowing that this kind of movies can be more unlikely, no one has said that the film has to be so. That Yes, if there is something that I finished convincing is the mareante (and pointless) camera movement, which aims to achieve tension but does but lose to the Viewer. He spent in the first part, in the second, and now not going to be less. Perhaps if not outside, so we'd in falta.pues everything is so particularly characteristic in this trilogy, predictability is unpredictable.For this reason, and despite that it is not so cool, so original and possibly somewhat more predictable, the truth is that, once again, the end returns to surprise, perhaps not with much astonishment, but with enough as to leave us the feeling that, in the fourth part, there will be one spectator.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3839

Moebius

El hombre invisible

muchocine

So please, ladies and gentlemen. Pass and "see" one of the strangest phenomena arising from Universal Studios. But beware, watch: the next time that they have "a breath in his barn", be cautious. Perhaps Claude Rains is there ready to make your own!

The stranger walking moves in the middle of a strong snowfall in search of refuge. With all that snow falling barely we can distinguish a coat and a hat. At a nearby Inn, the patrons chatting, drink, sing to the sound of the piano, are spent jokes. In short, have fun in the heat of the fire. However, to enter the strange everything changes. Covered with gloves, a scarf and a strange dark glasses, his face is hidden to the prying. While it is not tourist season, the owner of the Inn accepts prepare a room for the disturbing traveller. Little could imagine that angry his new hidden host a great secret.The invisible man, based on the immortal eponymous work of writer h. g. Wells, is another title emerged the new policy adopted by Carl Laemmle Jr. in the Universal to shoot big-budget films based on classics of fantasy and terror. At the head of the project was placed to James Whale, the wizard of the gothic horror and the light comedy which had provided his greatest success, the adaptation of the invisible man Frankenstein.En studies still have a scientist playing God, although on this occasion the terrible consequences turn forward to glory chemist in his own Monster. However, the Gothic atmosphere gives way to a sort of threat as invisible as a virus, causing a more characteristic of science movies horror fiction of the 1950s: top messages, collective panic, police mobilized. On the other hand, the hunting man and the distraught Lady and other elements of the film are a mere continuation of the already treated in Frankenstein.Por other side, view today, never ceases to be curious blend of horror and humor that used to build Whale in their work. I imagine that it would be to relieve some tension to a spectator bit accustomed to so many emotions, to then take it again to the paroxysm of horror. Anyway these small interspersed jokes do not harm anything to the tape and are quite endearing, and the almost magical sense of the pace of Whale is one glued to the screen for little more than an hour of film that anyone could say that they are just a few minutes.Of course the most spectacular moments of the film come hand in hand with really sublime special effects for the time. Never ceases to be fascinating to see how under such heavy clothes only there is a vacuum worrisome. How many spectators chillarían to such show?Considering that his face remains hidden during most of the film, see the dubbed version of the film (which has been my case) probably subtract much to the performance of the great Claude Rains; without going far James Whale chose him for the role by his voice, so if they have the chance they won't see the invisible man in its original version.Among the rest of the cast include Henry Travers (the Angel of how beautiful it is to live!) as the Chief Scientist and friend of the character of Rains and a sosa Gloria Stuart (the snowing of Titanic) as desperate girlfriend of the invisible chemical and daughter of the undaunted Travers, it seems that he treats every day with invisible men. Among the side is undoubtedly Una O'Connor, the homemade Grump married the innkeeper calzonazos. Your profile means halfway between Witch and Miss Rottenmeier, one is them enough alone to generate good comedic moments, as it would demonstrate later in what would be his last film, witness for the prosecution. Villagers suffering from the heavy jokes of the invisible Rains include character actors like Walter Brennan and John Carradine, although I have hardly been able to come to recognize none of them. Who I have been able to identify is the charismatic Dwight Frye as a journalist to interview the Chief of police.So please, ladies and gentlemen. Pass and "see" one of the strangest phenomena arising from Universal Studios. But beware, watch: the next time that they have "a breath in his barn", be cautious. Perhaps Claude Rains is there ready to make your own!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/333

Tito Chinchan

Jenaro el de los 14

muchocine

More bad than bad. Another clear example that if Alfredo Landa had been American would have eight oscars at home.

Buff, than surfeit of Iberian film, think I need a pair of Orcs and spacecraft sessions to detoxify me.The film is about Jenaro, a village of deep Spain and inveterate player of lotteries pregonero. One day, the surprise of the day football takes him to fool the people of Jenaro from 14. So with the beret surface warships threaded part to the capital to collect the money. But there he discovers bad which is society and all you want to take advantage of it. I do not understand, with the face of intellectual who has this man.Well, another clear example of our crappy film of the 1970s. And is there is no where take it. We can view it as the home version of "beauty and the beast" or "The ugly duckling", given that we have a redomado loser, that of the overnight is the most popular man in the country. Women who encamar (to use appropriate language) with him, to give the braguetazo of their lives. In the middle of the film we see something very obvious, "Pretty Woman" is nothing but a sequel to adapatada to this current times. A prostitute met millionaire to the saca of the street and fills her whims. HA, I already see Alfredo Landa asking image rights to Richard Gere. By the way, there are collaborations with renowned as Inigo "of the mustache" or Jaime de Mora y Aragón. But I am not convinced and aburridísima. Moreover, on top of evils is a chest or obliquely. This isn't scurfy film, it is the essence of dandruff.In short, more bad than bad. Another clear example that if Alfredo Landa had been American would have eight oscars at home. A caspita performance by don Alfredo.Besitos.P.D: "Rather than continuous gaze is alternating look" fine patriotic humor.Pd2: "and that's a knife?, men use this" says Jenaro by deploying the knife of Curro Jiménez p. (d). 3: "He has lost half glasses" tells Jaime de Mora y Aragon to see his Monocle. They will certainly shake and drop acorns "iiiiiieeeeeepa, dispatch!"

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/154

Freddy vs Jason

The Libertine

muchocine

The talent of Johnny Depp is makeup and wasted a unbearable character left

Freddy: I have No words to express how much I like this man. And do not believe that mine is same to dry, is that Johnny Depp is one of the best actors today, and the only ones that can bring forward with the CAP is a film that a priori might seem vulgar. If it is a bit Lord Byron, but shows very well, and is not the first nor the last makes it, the fall from the top of a true genius of poetry than it has been all for women (and men). But his return of twist is very appetizing, the truth. The Libertine has dialogs of those that make vibrate because more interpreted are recited with intensity. And in addition, immediately engages with a beginning (and end) directly involving the Viewer. After this performance, I mean, I'm looking forward to see, that I get the best Pirate Jack Sparrow. By the way, she, although little graced is a love.Jason: I totally disagree. We can not let ourselves be carried away by our passions personal when analyzing The libertine. Depp is one of the finest actors and with the broader records that move today through the cinema screens. However, and although it hurts to say it, in The Libertine his talent makeup is and in the hands of an unbearable character desperdiciado which Marquis de Sade low hours. And speaking of Sade, Quills that was a film in which actor, Geoffrey Rush, became the absolute protagonist. On that occasion, despite the simplistic theme, the result was acceptable. You can not say the same of The libertine. Here, even Depp can do something to bring forward a film doomed to failure since the first minute of footage, in which thing which never comes to fulfil promises. Fortunately, clear.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1317

Raúl Rubio

Diamante de sangre

muchocine

It is a weight tape and high quality, and shows us what not tells us nobody when these things happen in real time.

Many not will agree with me, but in my opinion DiCaprio (infiltrators) returning to regain the credibility that you cost get, and that he lost so fast in some of his previous films, the quality of his work in this film, is merely indisputable, as already comes to us lately accustomed screen full without giving a single glimmer in which we can doubt on their interpretation in this great movie in which Edward Zwick (the last) (Samurai), has wanted to tell us the events that have taken place in Sierra Leone at the end of the last century during the civil war that there was fought, with diamond mines as a backdrop.Hard film where they exist, in which apart from categorized by age, should also do so by the strength of our stomachs, at least as I see the shock of seeing a child brandish a weapon using it with more hatred and sanguinolencia that if a trained killer is involved, without disdain with the tranquility that are maiming they arms and be silent lives during a good part of the projection. Apart from trying to make us open our eyes to suffering and dubious origin of a large percentage of these precious stones, the film is also give a cry of alarm to the dormant Western minds of the abandonment to which they are subjected some regions of sub-Saharan Africa, and the problems that have led to a vast country in wealth, famine and despair as a result of the fraudulent exploitation of them.It is a constant film, which does not suffer at any time of ups and downs and that there is no room for boredom, not is really if it could make any differentiation in terms of the work of the three main actors, Djimon Hounsou (the island) and makes a splendid and completely credible, work in which Solomon Vandy, a desperate father gives lifehe struggles to find his family having been this section of it by the guerrillas, with the help of a diamond dealer and a journalist, played by the winner of an Oscar of the Academy Jennifer Connelly (Little Children), which disappointed nor at any time, despite the poor appearance of his character.In short, it is a film which cannot see, the reasons I alegaré are so simple as that I can not hide my favouritism towards the career of what I think is a great actor who still has much to show (talk about DiCaprio, and if not give it time to time), is a weight tape and high quality, and shows us what not tells us nobody when these things happen in real time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/90

Jose Contreras

Sky high

muchocine

Fun, refreshing, easy-going and exciting

Sky High is a film that somebody has to recommend to the public, because the criticism will not do so. They will prevent it serious reasons: is fun, refreshing, easy-going and exciting. If connoisseurs will pass it well with things as well would be misunderstandings and different and superior to other worldly viewers like you and like me.The film is made with two different materials: (The Incredibles) superhero films and the student dramas (bad girls). Will Stronghold is son of a superhero and father superhero, and is afraid of her first day at the Institute of superheroes because it doesn't have any superpower. You afraid to disappoint them. And this is true. In the test to decide that class will, Will has just sent to the class of the curritos that are the assistants of the superheroes (Sidekicks in English). Will he becomes friends with the other currito and just preferring them true heroes.The student drama consists of Will have to choose between the beautiful and the ugly, heroes and the curritos. The Institute teaches to develop the powers of the boys, but some do for good and others for evil. The enemy of Will is another child whose father was arrested for his own. The outcome is shot in the history of superheroes, not in student key, key and a pity because it leaves average half of social conflicts for bailouts. I am waiting with impatience the second part to see if it focuses more on the other side.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3491

Kiko de España

Heima

muchocine

Being a documentary about Sigur rós already knew that it would be unstoppable musically. Not imagined what it cautivase with such force, achieve so much with so little.

Heima is the spectacular documentary signature Dean DeBlois (Lilo & Stitch) on the Icelandic band Sigur rós, which during the year 2006 was to his native land to offer a series of free concerts without prior advertising.I worried about another documentary a bit sosote that really does not show me more than cool cockiness (going by the Oasis) series and horny, but finally and after cool cockiness, and I find myself with one of the most relaxing style exercises of recent times and some eager to mad to go to live there.Heima is not a follow-up to the use, a news story or a "documentary about a rock band" the feelings that emerge in a concert of the band are reflected in powerful images and a brutal beauty, a little "rebuscá" at the beginning but which gradually take over your fucking head, such as the memorable Von marked at Gamla Borg, time of absolute melancholic brilliance captained by that Orri on drums with a t-shirt on which we can read SADNESS.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/666

Rafa Ferrer

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

The film gets one out of the film pensive, thinking that perhaps, like Julio Verne in his books, Cuaron tells us other than as fable as truth

After his appearance (as a director), the penultimate installment of the adventures of Harry Potter, Alfonso Cuarón, directs this film's futuristic setting, which makes it revuelvan our consciences, starring Clive Owen (from "Closer" me has started to Marvel), Julianne Moore (in his usual, always upward line) and Michael Caine in the role of Grandpa "fingered".Filmed in London, in places that I know well by having been there for honeymoon, and giving the photo a dirty touch, almost 3rd mundista, the film gets one out of the film pensive, thinking that perhaps, like Julio Verne in his books, Cuaron tells us other than as fable as truth, no doubtmany of the things we see on the screen do not leave anyone indifferent, immigration, fear of rejection, political conspiracy.Finally, one of those movies that seem to go on tiptoe and that, however, and I turn to what my father said, "let poso" inside.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3653

Javier Saz

Redacted

muchocine

If the intention seems laudable (is the author of the script) the result seems false and impostado.

Brian De Palma tilting against the American army in "Redacted" (2007) showing us how soldiers violate a minor and the kill she and her family sausages in alcohol and drugs. The intention of De Palma denounce those facts although formally me disappointed seems laudable. Palm uses forms of the documentary fiction or mockumentary with domestic recordings of own soldiers, footage from security cameras, videos posted on internet or images from webcams. And I repeat, if the intention seems laudable (is the author of the script) the result seems false and impostado. Never over the footage I believe what I see, I always seem to actors performing, situations and dialogue already seen and heard.Film has successes as the use of the images hanging on Iraqi sites and some creative use of the domestic recordings as at the level autograba the latino soldier placing the fixed camera and spoke with his mother, stops a car behind him, they kidnap him, the level stays empty until that appears the soldier partner is amazed that this camera recording and turned her off.The film has generally received with applause (in addition to prize in Venice) by critics and it seems to me that the applause deserves them De Palma for their courage and commitment with its project rather than by its strict cinematic merits paying clumsily (in my opinion) to the formal path of cinema of complaint shown by the far superior "In This World" and "Road to Guantanamo".On the other hand find me it shameful that the producers of the film will decide unilaterally and against the wishes of its maximum author placing some unnecessary black stripes over the eyes of the victims appearing in real pictures that closes the film. A horror.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/957

Tito Chinchan

Nausicaä del valle del viento

muchocine

Another film of Miyazaki's essential viewing for children, to see if they can avoid the inevitable. The years have not cheated a shred of validity.

There are films that have a life outside the same projection which gives almost to another film. For example, this is based on a comic of seven deliveries made the teacher many years ago. They managed to persuade him to take her to the film, only the first two volumes. Reached Spain and the Legion do censors? He decided to shorten its duration, cutting more environmentalist party. Not content with this, they decided to give him enhancements to the theme, how to change the name to the protagonist calling Sandra instead of Nausicaä. By the way, to see it whole, in Japanese (that if, subtitled).The film is a girl that travels in a glider powered device and delves into a strange forest. Toxic clouds and insects as ones campan by rampant. In these it is a kind of shedding of an insect like a House and takes home the cornea. While he discovers the owner and manages to talk with him. Later going to the village, we discovered that she is a Princess and that the world is cursed because of the usual human beings.Watch that it is years old tape and this genius already spoke of such modern terms such as ecology and respect for nature. Through this recording shows the worst of the human race and in a crude way shows what the planet can result. While this goes to hell by our fault, we are still fighting everything with the force. The animation is correct, especially taking into account that the recording is 70. And the argument very interesting, though very hard, with a dramatic, although viewed with tenderness and optimism veneer. Perhaps up too.In short, another film of Miyazaki's essential viewing for children, to see if they can avoid the inevitable. The years have not cheated a shred of validity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/793

José A. Peig

Alien, el octavo pasajero

muchocine

The major achievement of?Alien? It is a superb combination between human characters and physical environment, the pervasive sense of horror and the unusual and the aesthetics of the graphic design.

Even at the end of the 1970s, the idea of which part this absolute masterpiece of the genre of science fiction is very unoriginal: story of suspense and terror on "bug that pursues and eats humans". Novelty occurred with a new location of the monster: the abyss in the framework of the futuristic vision of space travel and space. It is not enough to carry an old idea to a new space and time. I.e., the Ridley Scott film could be rather mediocre and, on paper, little or nothing would glimpse.But the great achievement of "Alien" is a superb combination between human characters and physical environment, the pervasive sense of horror and the unusual and the aesthetics of the graphic design. Conjunctions in the service of an eerie account for his sense of suspense, but also by its power of metaphorical, reaching an overwhelming operatic texture of claustrophobic in the depths of outer space. In fact, the real star of the film are not human profiles, but the physical and symbolic wrapper that acuna: the gigantic ship Nostromo. The design of the great commercial ship alludes to a huge mechanical monster that haunts in the interstellar void, or a large Castle or Gothic fortress that imprisons its inhabitants. The struggle between the human and the mechanical is present in their various strata. See the beginning of the film: the dark vacuum of the cosmos gives way to the mechanical monstrosity. Then the camera of Scott recreates in - through slow and contemplative close-ups - visualization of the passageways, wires, gossip, depths and computer devices which mean the Robotics soul of the ship. In this way, the environment is configured in real protagonist of visual representation. Then, a door opens and leads us to the room in which the human inhabitants are about to end their hibernation within the fortress: is no coincidence that the computer brain that governs the spacecraft and directs the human Entourage carrying the name of "Mother". From that point, enter to know the human life in the interior of the nave with a drawing of characters as simple as effective and, above all, diverse and rich in perspective: from the cold introversion of Kane, sarcasm and irony of Bred and his pupil, the extreme and Machiavellian scientism of Ash, the anguish of Lange or honest but hesitation authority of Dallasthat whole human provides an excellent chemistry of decisions and ways to cope with the danger. I.e. the physical packaging is added a highly human, depending on the needs of an argument which does not require characters excessively complex, but yes they must be significant in the confrontation with the situation and psychological context. And it succeeds.Beyond human it, the design of the alien and of each of the interiors, brimming with an aesthetic to horse of the Gothic and psychedelic, the abrupt and ghostly, configured a dreamlike atmosphere which adds to a sense of the horror experienced by the human characters at all times. The claustrophobic emulsion caused by suffocating architecture of the nave and the subtle presence of the alien is reinforced in different frames in which Scott cares well placed human profiles in a closed space doors, passageways, gases, sounds, and ghostly silhouettes insinuadas in every corner of the visual field (see the sequence of Dallas in the search for the bug through the ventilation tunnels): a simple frame of Dallas profile violently cut and suppressed by the closure of one of the hatches, a single resource but of great expressive force used in this context, which reinforces the stinging claustrophobic dimension of the story. (Or the wise does not show the entire body of the Alien, accentuating its physical ambiguity on par with their presence subtly drawn in the reliefs of doors, walls, ceilings or walls) very intelligently, the own silhouette and physical texture of the alien resembles and is confused with the tubes that run along walls and passageways, making the human environment to form a unit with the mechanical environment of the nave and the biological of the alien. This perfect and stimulating combination of elements is which gives it its great singularity.In the metaphorical, the physical dimension of the ship, the "Mother" (its counterpart "psychic") computer, Ash and the alien are mechanical parts of attenuated cold rationality faced sharper humanity of Ripley and his. The story gains a rough and deeply dramatic background when we discovered that real conspiracy puppets are not human but machines: the death of Ash, so gesticulante with these violently truncated cables, white coming to GLUGs and grotesque cybernetic noise blood, transmits with a great sense of dreams the chilling discovery of inhumanity that hid under a guise of responsible for rationality. In the words of the same Ash, the alien is the biological body par excellence, for its destructive action without remorse and "without moral fantasies" that could suppress them. I.e., the perfect machine that frightens and pursues those who already are prisoners of the ship Nostromo. so because its enormous metaphorical power leads us to a consideration as important as its excellent realization at the script level, structure, tonality and aesthetic in the narrative field as in the plastic sense; "Alien", apart from a tale of terror, is also an allegory about the objectification in the technological age, man lost in a cosmic vastness of findings in the form of travel and technological creations, but helpless against the machinery of power and the unconsciousness of many.In a sense, the solitude and anguish of Ripley running through the interior of the bowels of the ship Nostromo, through the passages saturated of technology, fumes and industrial fumes, sounds shrill and threatening, in a ghostly setting in which you do not know the danger that lurks to turn the corner in each fork, his solitude reflected the loneliness of modern manmore human than ever but increasingly more prisoner of the mechanical. And what better environment than the empty abyss of space to place this modern nightmare.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1652

Silvia Giner

Hannibal: El origen del mal

muchocine

It smells far sequel, but it annoys me intensely that it is distorted and unnecessarily breakdown of a story as Hannibal Lecter. Not has seemed very gore, he was indeed me you waiting more strong in this aspect...

When it is the story of a character has both thrashed is frankly difficult to avoid redundancy. Hannibal is a film which was expected much and frankly has been half-hearted. Still sweet and perverse seduction of young Hannibal runs through your retinas tearing your corneas with the thirst for revenge. I can get lost in those frantic and bereaved eyes understand the origin of evil is not but the birth of a pain so abominable that it is stuck in your soul forever.I expected "Yes", I expected something more of this young Hannibal who has love me completely. But it is the character that I am talking about, not the film, confined to having "little detail" the transformation of the child into the monster. You stay with the feeling to know more, what ocrurió then? where were the characters after all that?It smells far sequel, but it annoys me intensely that it is distorted and unnecessarily breakdown of a story as Hannibal Lecter. We are still to discover many things that this film does not clarify.I have to say that I have not liked neither the music nor the "reality film" pace.Caption: To my colleague Francisco Bellon I do not dicerencia has seemed very gore, he was indeed me you waiting more strong in this aspect. A greeting Fran!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/409

Lady Winter

Corrupción en Miami

muchocine

Impeccable in the aesthetic, but with too many gaps in development. It is long and lacks sufficient action to hook.

The expected and desired the film adaptation of the legendary Miami Vice television series is already among us with a final result that I doubt to meet fans of the original. Michael Mann signed a flawless film in the aesthetic, but with too many gaps in development. A history of action should not that the Viewer is bored and make your imagination too far from the room. This is the biggest mistake of Miami Vice: action scenes with other vapid that serve to unite one and another. But even the action is most common within this film of policemen. Except in the final scene, the shots are scarce as if there is a tremendous crisis in arms of blanks.Formulates it failure and feels terrible chapter too stretched. The best is, without doubt, Jamie Fox as Ricardo Tubbs, in his role as faithful follower of disposing of all of Sonny Crockett, played by Colin Farrell zarrapastroso that are chasing a china (rather than bad) during most of the footage. In the end, Miami Vice has become the loving pursuit of Sonny, which is limited to follow the dictates of their hormones showing that it is a rebel. A nonsense. As our Luis Tosar? What could we say? Let's say that it is correct. He plays the villain, a capo of the drug in Cuba who hires two policemen (incognito) to make a little. Tosar has a couple or three appearances shows him sober and content (didn't have to do much more). On the contrary, their Academy English seems good, perhaps too forced. But, what does it matter that if already folded you here with Cuban accent.It there is little to say about the film, which tells the typical police story style two rebel policemen. Tubbs and Crocketts must infiltrate a network of drug trafficking to finish with the greatest Chief of the market, but someone crosses on its way (a girl, clear) and everything is complicated. The story is that expected of a film as well, but it is long and lacks sufficient action to hook. The good aesthetic result is all positive, but little value taking into account the high budgets that handles Hollywood. No doubt, we repeat that Jamie Foxx is the best, it demonstrates once again that goes the same for a serious movie that for another not so much. Tosar may have more luck in his next foray Hollywood, although his safe pocket that does not complain.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3503

Rafa Ferrer

Fast food nation

muchocine

A tape well built, brief, intense and full of aromas, sometimes to Ketchup, others to mustard, and many others to blood and human suffering...

Some years ago, my sister, watching as I aficionaba to junk food, recommended me a book written by a physician of the Army USA (if memory does not fail me, and if it fails I forgive me) spoke about the evil fast food in the States and by fault of hygiene and bad food education, had hundreds of deaths around the world; I would say the book struck me, and that it took me long time to not only look at a hamburger with eyes of desire, but it cost me swallow it calmly to overcome my first care.Richard Linklater, is one of those directors who, as does a drama or a comedy, a tape of abysmal depths here directs a tape well constructed, brief, intense and full of aromas, sometimes to Ketchup, others to mustard, and many others to blood and human suffering.Since the "Crash" to triumph, and long before other tapes of your invoice, we are putting in "fashion" of the films that tell various stories, just relacionandose each other, watching the same story or theme from different points of view; This time is no exception, and the tape of Linklater, shows both the profile of the Executive of the chain of ice, as employees, farmers and retailers. It is true that in some feeds more than in others. The cast we find a series of faces, many of them well-known, well known, cameos of common of the Linklater, and film actors that we have ever seen on screen (the latter for Mexican immigrants).In short: A tape that reaches the eyes, rises to the brain so we think, and it will never come to the stomach, strange, given that the tape is about food, advisable, although sometimes not give both whether, as it was to be expected.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/355

Nisuyaves

Maleficio

muchocine

The worst thing I've seen for some time. Offers phrases as: "Be careful, the night is dark"... do seriously?

I do not usually see this genre of movies, and I reaffirm after seeing this desecration of the film. Consists of a curse that is to let you go cold on the girl child (he removed the blanket every few minutes) and hitting slaps! We are going to highschool with the poor Betsy.Unos believe that it is an entity, others not, some say "but have not seen?", others "not saw nothing", "her were slapped", "was with a cane" do?. you already imagine.But they still have time to think about marrying poor Betsy with 20 years older Professor. The film, to call it somehow gives us phrases for posterity like these: "Be careful, the night is dark," do seriously?Now is comuncica with noise "does that is a Yes or a no?" I assume. "When a witch of blood stain the clothes of someone, means that it is going to." "To what?" "you have to tell me."-We are cortitos eh!. And scenes of the more cumbersome as the typical religious ritual, reading the Bible, with the camera rotating in both directions.When the girl is playing with the spirit girl and that you miss water, hehe, you echo I tí, hehe, ahhhhhhhhh that you're a bad bug!Doors and Windows are closed, dizzying cameras, the fire which is aviva, the scene in bed as the Exorcist girl, eyes blank. at least the spirit sees in black and white, good from time to time.Ah! and has a scene flying, which Javier Bardem in Mar Adentro. Ignoring the "plagiarism" is the best there is, if it is a good thing that it can be drawn.Anyway, that in the end, nosé as tell it to not tell (forgive the redundancy), the case is that what hit you age., madremía to tontuna, but best of all is that history repeats itself, but well that kind of depraved parents there are in this world!Conclusion: The worst thing I've seen for some time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1670

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Empieza el espectáculo

muchocine

Biography of a unique director Bob Fosse. Musical an apotheosis, legacy of a genius.

As I does not attract the musical, begins the show (All that jazz) had not generated me any interest when a more than well stocked payment channel her scheduled some time ago. The interference of the music in the film was not (isn't it yet) Holy of my many devotions, but fell in the generous Act of sit to see when it was released on DVD. I pertreché a good dose of patience and I said that I would endure until the end because has the fame that has and the soundtrack. Only for the part On Broadway performed by a vitamin George Benson (I said) already worth the drink. The reality imposed on my prejudices: usually occurs. I have no problem asking for forgiveness or backtrack I: I enjoyed it very much, I found a unique and unusual, blatant, philosophical and cheerful, combat dramatic film and covered by a thin layer of bad milk great mark of the House, that is, of the great Bob Fosse, who had seen years ago Cabaret and of which I still keep miu pleasant memories (even though)(in spite of being musical film, clear).All that jazz (I'm going to call it instead of the less protein begins the show) is a Vertigo of ingenuity, a demonstration of the talent of a man obsessed with death, this autobiography filmed the choreographer and director Fosse, stripped and rarely cinema has shown a man presented letters of his death, evidence mortuary of a life escorada always to the excessrepresented on the screen in the character of Joe Gideon (a never more convincing Roy Scheider).The choreographed pieces and music occupy a considerable part of the footage is not without prejudice so that the film is not entirely musical. Music and dance are resources of a deeper idea: that of the descent to hell of a man who has escaped to his demons (to their vices, their sins (and now look how health undermines their challenge and arrumba le in a bed, where he makes danceable epitaph of its transit around the world.))

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3135

Rafa Ferrer

Supersalidos

muchocine

An excellent comedy youth, debt of tapes as "Jo night" or "All in a day"... Like friends and strangers.

For a time this part well for working reasons, either for personal reasons, I am missing much of the press passes that Muchocine.net provides us with to go, and it had to be my good friend Plissken who strongly recommend me viewing of this film, which already had in mind, but the helping hand of a friend always helps right?It is clear that this film, this pensanda that the chavalería have fun at the movies, and while "American Pie" and similar films marked a before and a later in the comedy recent American this time, "Supersalidos" gets not only overcome with a vengeance to the saga of Apple Pie, but also at times get, not only that laugh (that you ries), but also make us think and see a reflection of which many have been, if, with the age of the Portas I was also quite "pardillo" in the 3 members.Great both Michael Cera, Christopher Mintz-Plasse as and of course I cannot forget me Jonah Hill, impressive, taking the reins of the tape on its side more geek and carefree.On the other hand, there is a name, which comes lately glued to the comedy with a solid staple difficult to separate, I am referring to Seth Rogen, as a modern King Midas, making gold and taquillazo sure everything thing that touches, or where it comes.It was the 2nd Act the tape loses a tad of bellows, but well, that's no problem for her final Fireworks.In short, I do not want to lengthen, an excellent youth comedy debtor tape as "Jo night" or "All in one day". Like friends and strangers.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2647

Iñaki Bilbao

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

A healthy entertainment for the whole family, the truth is that it does not discover anything new that has not been on TV, but is that not what sought. Long fun with the Simpsons.

Fun long based on the already long and successful television series of cartoons with Simpsons stars.Here, with a duration of three chapters and a half, he follows with his misadventures, taking them to them as the main and almost almost unique character.Therefore, if someone had not seen, impossible thing, a chapter of the series, would the same because I could perfectly understand the idiosyncrasies of the characters, since, say side, just they have an important part. Know nothing of them difficult not one iota the understanding of history.A story with plot of clear ecological dye, which serves to give puyazos to almost everything that moves: the Government, its politicians, religion, sex, ecology. everything is touched and sometimes sunk in a very entertaining movie, like his great pace and their funny and successful dialogue.A healthy entertainment for the whole family, the truth is that it does not discover anything new that has not been on TV, but is that not what sought. If it would have been the case, be original, have obviously not achieved. But passes it one good seeing it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2396

Josini

En la cuerda floja (Tightrope)

muchocine

Through a detective and auto-revelador itinerary, Clint will heal this wound of abandonment and loneliness have produced, and that makes it approximates to the brothels across the line which should not pass a police officer that only looks for answers.

Tightrope is the story of a policeman who has discover and arrest a violator and murderous psychopath, however, has the same taste and seems to know him thoroughly. Through a detective and auto-revelador itinerary, Clint will heal this wound of abandonment and loneliness have produced, and that makes it approximates to the brothels across the line which should not pass a police officer that only looks for answers.Clint Eastwood plays a policeman in New Orleans as contradictory as good, gentle and tender with her daughters, a character far from police archetypes that made him famous, very suitable for its qualities interpretative, given to radiating subtle gestures, thoughts and experiences not communicable with words, own of the finest actors.His screenplay is exquisite. It's a script prepared and pampered to the point of contain tracks, symbols and repetitive elements or items that give the movie buff the possibility of intellectual desfrute, which is almost the same of a police thriller.I like because it is one of those movies of the paradigm of genera that perhaps I like most, is that of the police thriller of the eighties, that where the streets of the big city are and will feel as they are hard and coming, where violence restalla and is not hiding, and where sexuality lives contorted. In the paradigm of life without sense of the great American city, the characters of Clint Eastwood, Al Pacino or Charles Bronson have overcome the wounds of their pasts - already too reused in the film Hollywood – which they paralyze them or prevent them from enjoying life and lock them in the sordid world of crime and murder.These classic stories contain women, could not be otherwise, make revitalization archetype of the soul to these tormented characters, the female symbol of women who, for the depressed man, returns to reality, giving resources to deal with it. Because here Genevieve Bujold in the main plot does not help anything, it only hampers, however it is in the relationship you have with Clint where his advice help you not to find the murderer, but to find himself.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/732

Jeremy Fox

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

Realization is quite sober and relies mainly on a good and funny script and solidly defined and magnificently interpreted by the supporting characters.

Almost all the years start from scratch a low-budget film that no one had and which rises with the favor of the public and any nomination for the oscars. This year it seems that it is this role to "Little Miss Sunshine" (Little Miss Sunshine).The film tells the trip a somewhat problematic family has to perform in his van, to the youngest of the family in the competition of Miss Sunshine. "As in any good film, and this is, the physical journey will become to turn an inner journey that will make evolve the characters (some more than others) and will change the family forever.""Little Miss Sunshine" is the debut in the realization of films of Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, successful directors of commercials and video clips. I can not devote better compliment that say that the film lacks the typical defects from managers of these artistic areas.In fact the realization is quite sober and relies mainly on a good and funny script and characters solidly defined and performed beautifully by the cast, formed by Greg Kinnear, Alan Arkin, Toni Collette, Steve Carell, Paul Dano and Abigail Breslin and that it would be difficult to point out any member. Thanks to them we laughed and were excited for the 100 minutes that lasts for the film.You might criticize you that some situations are something forced and your (voluntary) nature of small film and unpretentious. But, fortunately, the history of the cinema is full of good small films without pretensions, of those that we like to see a year after another. Time will tell if that is the final destination of "Little Miss Sunshine".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4295

Jaime Martínez

Mulholland drive

muchocine

Dreamlike, hypnotic, mixed, poetic and wonderful work perfectly hilvanada and studied by Lynch. Best of Mulholland Drive is the feeling of satisfaction and fullness that gives you when you have understood her.

I do not know very well how to start this comment on the unclassifiable work of David Lynch, so I simply say that it is great visual spectacle. Magic eye. Dreamlike, hypnotic, mixed, poetic and wonderful. Disturbing to infinity. Chaotic in every sense. It is one of those works that does not leave indifferent anyone, or you hate the love; and I just am that loves her. Don't try to look for logic or any consistency during viewing (or after the), only let yourself go by what it conveys. Opens the mind and get ready for a trip without return to the universe Lynch. And is that gentlemen, is Mulholland Drive. Film after film, David Lynch does amaze me and passionate me in equal parts. The strength and power of his images is overwhelming. This ability to mix the situations and context is a genius. The treatment that gives the music in all of his films is mysterious, shocking and excellent. Lynch has this innate ability in some directors leave in shock the Viewer after their films. Let be the same viewer who interpret and you way to what you have just seen. Lynch gives you the canvas and paints, and it's you who should paint the picture. Lynch you hints and you interpret. Lynch does not display and you are looking for desperately "something" in the level. Lynch gives us a puzzle, and we who must mount it. Genius of the suggestion has the seventh art. And it lasts for many years more. Exciting atmosphere delusional, austere and disturbing you catch a few minutes and the best you can do is to let yourself go. I have come to the conclusion that the Lynch film to abandon all hope of logic and coherence, leave to seek the why of things and plunging fully into what vomits us Lynch. As for the cast of Mulholland Drive, overhangs a stupendous Naomi Watts all. With its dual role (track) tries to deceive (rather Lynch) the spectator to confuse us and do not understand anything. We are in their dreams, and their dreams anything can be possible. Then we have a very sensual Helena Laura Harring also embroidering his amnesiac role where the ambiguity and confusion seize him. Dark and gloomy photo, play with colors to suit (especially blue and red, track), to move the camera in a very subjective way, it seems that her wear yourself at times (the Tramp and the apartment scene). Attention to the order which gives Lynch to the end titles (that pillo are, David); in order of appearance. (TRACK). With memorable scenes, such as the scathing criticism to the world of Hollywood and his pawns; scenes difficult to forget and charged of feeling as in the theatre or in the hearing; and moments of extreme beauty as the lesbian scene, Mulholland Drive has become everything a film concerning the current; filled with symbolism and full of metaphors. Ultimately, a story that breaks down completely all chronological and narrative conventions to which we are accustomed. Lynch takes the canons and clichés of the film normally accepted by the great public and given a 180 degree turn. Hypnotic and dreamlike is a tape for the enjoyment of the senses. Intelligent more not to and perfectly hilvanada and studied by Lynch, it is more stimulating. Best thing about Mulholland is the feeling of satisfaction and fullness that gives you when you have understood her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/545

Plissken

Gracias por fumar

muchocine

Jason Reitman has surpassed his father (of agreement, was not too difficult) with only a comedy, coated fable amoral and provocative. Comedy of the year and serious candidate for the title of film of the year.

'Thank you for smoking' (2005), opera prima of Jason Reitman (son of Ivan Reitman), begins with a magnificent credit titles, a country song is that not going behind and first 15 minutes simply unforgettable, halfway between starts great 'Uno de los nuestros' and 'Magnolia'. "Exaggerated", you say. Not expect to check it on DVD, I tell you. There are more satire and venom in these fifteen minutes than in the rest of the world film production that far this year. And there is more.On the basis of the eponymous book by Christopher Buckley, Jason Reitman, it tells the story of Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhart overwhelming), Vice-President of the Academy of tobacco studies (funded by the tobacco industry, of course) and official spokesman for the industry in United States. He knows that it is one of the most hated men in (North) America, but does not care, because it is the best in his work: convince the general public that tobacco critics are wrong. Naylor and his friends Polly and Bobby Jay (fun Maria Bello and David Koechner), defenders of the alcohol and armament industries colleagues, gather often to presume who causes more deaths per year. His twelve year son (Cameron Bright finally making "normal child") seems interested in follow in their footsteps. Its ambitious plan to bring tobacco to the film has been approved. The life of Nick is perfect, leaving aside the lack of values or the amorality of some of their actions. But the downside of being the type more hated in the country is that there are many people looking forward to fall.In just 100 minutes, Reitman Gets a dazzling formal and impeccable film in his speech, which is none other that support freedom of thought and choice. As non smokers, but each and every one of us, exposed to continuous handling media and pressures of all signs. 'Thank you for smoking' satirizes and challenge to all those involved in one of those "great debates" of public opinion, and achieved the same Viewer to understand the twisted logic of the protagonist, if it fails to adopt her: no position is inherently good or bad, only it is think and then choose what they want to defend, because everything is defensible in this manipulated world. Debatable, incidentally, also this last resort. But that is.And returning to the film: blossoms secondary players on characters with just a couple of sequences (the already appointed friends and partners of the "merchants of death Squadron"; the aceradísima criticism of the current Hollywood carried out by Rob Lowe and Adam Brody; imposing Robert Duvall as capo of the tobacco and Sam Elliot as cancerous Marlboro man; or the hilarious William H. Macy as Senator Finistirre cheater)elegant planning & photography, design production as venomous as the text itself (the poster of the bar where they meet the merchants of death). All at great height.Jason Reitman has surpassed his father (of agreement, was not too difficult) with only a comedy, coated fable amoral and provocative. Comedy of the year and serious candidate for the title of film of the year. A 9'5

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3880

Andrés Pons

Crimen en la noche

muchocine

Clarkutiliza masterfully as well as other authors as Romero in his saga Zombie or Parkinson in Dead Creatures living dead subgenre to break molds based on fierce criticism demonstrating that occasionally horror also serves as a denunciation film.

The deceased BOB CLARK reaching fame with comic saga PORKYS directed at the beginning of his career notable works of the most visceral horror SLASHER BLACK Christmas and above all in is masterpiece who happens to be in my opinion the best title of his filmography.Two great performers worried with his great characterizations, RICHARD BACKUS of television fame after his participation in several series, REMINGTOON STEEL or law and order. Accompanied by the always solvent JHON MARLEY to just participate in the godfather.This work can be summarized in a camouflaged horror about ZOMBIES film when in fact is one of the most brilliant metaphors on the dramatic consequences of the war of the Viet Nam. Young people who came totally insane drug addicts who never returned to be the same.CLARK used masterfully like other authors as Romero in his saga ZOMBIE or DEAD CREATURES PARKINSON the living dead subgenre to break molds based on fierce criticism demonstrating that occasionally horror also serves as a denunciation film.Not missing however moments of open anguish nor something Gore, brilliant dialogue, photography sick with notable music help create one of the large cinematographic references in the genus unjustly forgotten.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4189

Jesus David

Mortadelo y Filemón: Misión Salvar la Tierra

muchocine

A hodgepodge with capital letters in which are saved, perhaps, the principle and some gag of the protagonists and Todoquisque, played by Alex O'Dogherty. Boring, child and do script? that it verges on the absurd.

You can see the poster? What do you think? Shit is not it? Because the film for the style, but expected. A crappy capitalized which save perhaps the principle and some gag of the protagonists and Todoquisque, played by Alex O'Dogherty. Boring, child and do script? that it verges on the absurd. I am going to defend Pepe Viyuela and Eduard Soto because the poor do what they can to such nonsense. Nothing to do with its predecessor, is too noticeable change of director and vision "peculiar" about the humor that they follow the comics. Reminded me the time of Benny Hill, which ran the police and caco fast camera, in fact here use it on several occasions, is known that you made them grace to the writers.The argument, see. the plot is about a very bad bad who wants to leave the planet without water to sell its substituent of the same product: the botijola. The case is Mortadelo y Filemón will have to stop them and blah blah blah. I'd like to tell or you apetecerá read it. The truth is I am imagining the writers, among which is the director, writing the script and mondando of laughter. I imagine them all three discussing on what to put in the movie:-Hey! I have an idea. We could do some scenes in fast camera so that people retuerza of laughter in the seats. And abuse she nauseam.-If Yes, good idea. Although I have another better. I call my nephew that handles this of the photochop and do us a dog than punching, juas juas juas-great! We can also get you the voice of Bart Simpson, the people will fall exhausted at our feet. And the dog will be called Bush, juas juas juas what evil I am!-about punching me gusta. We are going to do is to give all Campion throughout the film. And now, we only need to write the dialogues of the characters-Buff that lazy uncle, mira, improvisen, to pa' that paid. We Let's go to the bar.Because that, shameful. There is no where take it. Most jokes give embarrassment and the dog, truth, regrettable. We will, quite contrary to the movie that made Fesser, many criticized in his day, but that seems to me a vision very successful comics, is well written and well directed, and you laugh, that is what matters. But cannot say the same of the film by Bardem. In short, as I have already said, regrettable. I stay at home reading the comic, in truth, is the best thing you can do.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/474

Tito Chinchan

Pequeño pero matón

muchocine

Comedy of flat encephalogram, lumpy humor and dubious taste.

Watching the trailer for the TV told me my intelligent part of the brain "this do not see her or in joke". But as in the end sends the irrational part of the same, because ale to see patochadas of a Lord of small size which makes your baby more ugly in the world.The film is a tiny thief of jewels out of prison after a long stay. Nothing more out, with his partner of normal size but small brain, steal a tremendous diamond. But something goes wrong and they have to hide the diamantón in the bag of a girl. Coincidentally, this girl has a boyfriend eager to be dad, so the two absurd minds cavil that the baby becomes a grotesque baby to recover the jewel. And it is already bundled.The creators of Scary Movie bring us this film of grotesque humour, in the style of the four previous, but much less funny. I have to admit that I laughed a lot, especially with the faces of the baby, but the thing is not for stalks are. The idea is very absurd and does not give a whole movie. But hey, if we invigorate the shock of seeing the small Lord (not be if it really is a dwarf or special effects) had a good time. To highlight the trajecitos that put, are to die for, and some scenes, especially those of sexual Court. The end was so they could have spared, that worthy even more the final product.In short, comedy flat encephalogram, lumpy humor and of dubious taste, what will not prevent us carcajeemos to taste. That if, leaving the brain at home and forgetting what is a coherent and interesting script. Rating: 2 out of 5 (and it is what God wants)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2746

Kiko de España

Disturbia

muchocine

Transformers was the confirmation of the talent of Shia LaBeouf, great here also Corey Feldman. The start of the movie is giant and already you can not takeoff.

Second film of voyeurs that I see this week and antithesis alone with her, Disturbia is the blockbuster that will come to our screens for September or October neither more nor less.Genuine crack-ta-ta-lockers in the United States is a fun teen thriller that works a charm because Carl Ellsworth and Christopher B. Landon, the writers are very clever guys.They have borrowed the Decade of the eighties (and are already.), specifically night of fear, A cool gang and the neighborhood of Tom Hanks to make one of those clip shows go thou to know why, works.Transformers was the confirmation of the talent of Shia LaBeouf, great here also Corey Feldman. The start of the movie is giant and already you can not takeoff.One of those rare occasions where it is rewarding to review the past. With regard to the enormous delay in the premieres of some feature films (in particular the latest Coen) today in the country read Diego Galán quoting Mr. Belvedere: in full 2007, any downtime is a clear invitation to theft.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3435

Patri

La tumba de las luciérnagas

muchocine

The protagonists are so human and are wanting so much that his story touches deeply and leaves no one indifferent.

The grave of the fireflies was directed in 1988 by Isao Takahata, author of the popular series framework and Heidi, Takahata is a major character in the world of Japanese animation, having founded along with Hayao Miyazaki Studio Ghibli, which have come out masterpieces such as the journey of spirited away, Princess Mononoke and Nausicaa. It is based on a novel by Akiyuki Nosaka, who was inspired by his own experiences, he had a sick mother and a younger sister who died of malnutrition during the war.The grave of the fireflies tells the hard and tragic story of the young Seita, of 14 years and her little sister Setsuko, 5, children of a Japanese naval officer. During World War II, his mother dies after a bombing and, after a brief stay at his aunt's House, where they are not welcome, both will remain homeless having to take refuge in a cave, in a time where the food and aid are scarce. It is a story of survival in extreme conditions, a portrait of the human miseries in times of war. The protagonists are so human and are wanting so much that his story touches deeply and leaves no one indifferent. It is a beautiful film that tragic, its beauty is really touching scenes such as the cave lit by fireflies or the principle, when, after the death of Seita narrated by himself, appears the old Tin of candy Setsuko and his brother gives you the hand. (Watch the movie for the second time this scene is understood better)The Japanese animation film is probably the best that exists, for decades they are doing true works of art that are beginning to be appreciated in the West now, they are films with a very deep and human background, sometimes dramatic, like this or lighter as Miyazaki's My Neighbor Totoro, but always worth a visit them, not only for its beauty but also for its message and pacifist contentfeminist and environmentalist, like Princess Mononoke, in which there are three.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/659

Rafa Ferrer

La máquina de bailar

muchocine

Another mierdón that puts "jeta" Santiago Segura, and which one is forgotten almost at the speed that view.

The New REC Park are an old arcade of the Centre where adolescents Miss afternoons in a world of neon colors and strident musiquillas. Among them, Dani (Jordi Vilches) and his gang, a group of kids of Fuenlabrada, are the masters of a singular game: La machine dance. Dani works in a supermarket. There a segurata pint of serial killer he is a good kid, so he asks that his albino boa (a caprice of nature) care during the month that will go abroad. And of course Dani, as well as monitor the animal uses the floor to organize a fiestecita with a friends and step to send the serpent to another neighborhood in an unfortunate accident. The gang it is not another remedy that seek a replacement animal, but the only are costs a paste. They do not know or where to start unless they discover the convening of the first national contest of the dance machine, which will be held in the Hall of the Manga. But they need the help of an expert choreographer, someone to guide them in the complex world of dance competitions to compete at a high level. Johnny, in charge of the New Park, was an old champion when disco music was all the rage. Moved by the kids (which remind him a little to himself), decides to prepare them.Every day, on the way to work, I was with posters strewn with Atocha station and banners of this "sensational" (Note irony) film, on the other hand, I do not know very well why, and although I always try denying this kind of unfortunate events, I just falling, and it is that here this sad mortal, prefers a sandwich mortadella to a ration of the most interesting delicacy, that is why today, and without it planned, and thinking about going to see another film, a part of me, maybe the more B (of natural and banana), me has finished dragging so lamentable spectacle.One envisages it knowing that it is before the worst that your eyes can see, and that Santiago Segura is usually nourish this, its cutrecine for kneading? at box office, of a cumbersome but effective way without doubt, with Jordi Vilches, pigeonholed as Michael Landon, in the role of young geek (which already repeated in "End of course", "Cymbals flyers" and any movie showing).On the other hand, the film seems a "publi-report" of the company KONAMI, famous not only for Pro Evolution Soccer, but also by those infernal machines hitting jumps and dance (for which our body is not empowered to such tremendous coordination), rhythm of unceasing music, heavy and machacota, brought from the East. Finally, another mierdón that puts "jeta" Santiago Segura, and which one is forgotten almost at the speed that visiona.Incidentally, also leaves José Corbacho, but better to be spent to films such as "Tapas" or casual appearances in "Buenfuente", because here is to forget his fronted.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3974

Oscar Martínez

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

His greatest achievement is the binomial consisting of John Hurt and Elijah Wood, two actors able to capture our attention although the plot no longer interest us.

After having offered as unclassifiable and at the same time as personal titles such as mutant action, the day of the beast, Perdita Durango, community, 800 balas, dead of laughter or crime ferpecto, Álex de la Iglesia returns after four years of silence (except for the child's room) with the crimes of Oxford, starring Elijah Wood, John HurtLeonor Watling, Julie Cox, Burn Gorman, Anna Massey and Jim Carter among others.Based on the novel by Guillermo Martínez crimes imperceptible, the film tells the story of an exchange student who discovers the lifeless body of his landlady, who was married to one of the mathematicians who deciphered the Enigma code in World War II. At the same time, a Professor of logic at Oxford receives a note warning that this is the first of a series of murders. Thus, the student and the teacher join in the search for the person behind the deaths, using mathematical codes to find the pattern that follows this Assassin in series...Beyond the quality of the movie itself, it must be said that the Oxford murders is a radical turn in the film career of Álex de la Iglesia. But, for better or worse? Without any doubt, is not his most brilliant work, but not a product that renege. And, at the same time, it is still most unclassifiable as the rest of his filmography, ironically, he is his more orthodox film.The Oxford murders is a thriller that revolves around a series of murders, and as all film of this genre, there will be ready on duty claiming that the final outcome is already sensed from the first minute. This sometimes is a good and a server has served such a claim on more than one occasion, but I do not think that the Oxford murders is as deductible as more than one pretend.The film of Álex de la Iglesia is totally recommended, endowed with a brioso pace and always something interesting to tell, although one must recognize its mescolanza of philosophy and mathematics can get tired in some fragments. Their characters, in greater or lesser degree, we still Recalling somehow to those used usually by the director bilbaino, while the alleged international character of the film seems to have them jeunetizado considerably, and not I refer simply to the presence of Dominique Pinon, but rather to the characters played by Burn Gorman and Jim Carter.Por other side, can be said that the plot of the Oxford murders is interesting although not overly complex, and his greatest achievement, beyond the fact that its resolution is completely arbitrary - or what is the same as any other would have been as feasible as the chosen, is the binomial consisting of John Hurt and Elijah Wood, two actors able to capture our attention although the plot no longer interest us. That, and the portentous mammary glands of Leonor Watling, sincerely, impeding me analyze its performance.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2321

Rafa Ferrer

El Elegido

muchocine

The tape, another trough of pot, Jean-Christophe Grangé, tries to Peck of different genres without success one, from the film of intrigue, passing by the assassins in series, and even the western...

I have a couple of days chasing see this film, the first day, schedule is not commensurate with my work shifts, and sessions or began very early or they finished very late, finally today I got a hole in my busy schedule and her I have been able to watch, and my opinion may not be more unfavourable.When I saw the trailer I took to recognize Monica Bellucci, removing his electrifying femininity embedded in clothing typically male, leaving out this brutal Sex-appleal that she has on screen, and making it almost a heroine of action, thing quite silly, on the other hand, because the moans that hits during much of the footage the closer a actress X than a heroine of action cinema.Tape, another trough of pot, Jean-Christophe Grangé, author among others of "Rivers of purple" (whose first part is masterful, and whose second smacks in parathyroids to "code Da vinci") and "Pact of wolves" bad tape Jean Reno, where the alla tries to Peck of different genres without success one, from the film of intrigue, passing by the assassins in series, and even with the western.With a plot so mysterious as these best seller of rapid consumption that you hooked on reading and you disappoint in its final resolution, even though the mythical Catherine Devenue try to give an air of mystery to his role.The tape is liosa, with that plot that opens in several directions and closes at once no matter the slightest, and that spare no blood or show us spectacular bodies, but is in the end a fraud, painful and poorly built.A Bluff that comes to the screen and will happen to more punishment than glory.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2364

Bloody Will

28 semanas después

muchocine

Do this film contains all the elements to become a classic, and no doubt enter the annals of? sequels very at the height of his original?.

What careful we already in the aftermath. It seems as if this year were cursed and every second or third installment which premiered in theaters is a direct kick to the stomach and a clear turning point to avoid future sequels. What illusion, how much time has passed to say:? is 28 weeks later?!!! It is the cane!Juan Carlos Fresnadillo disembarks in the USA after a single film?Intact?, he left a very good taste and a very peculiar form of roll film. Do do these ways, hobbies and customs are reflected in full in? 28 weeks later?, which together with a well done script, an unbearable tension and many, many media, make the very best I've seen in recent months, let alone the best zombies movie for years.The question always: better or worse than? 28 days later?. Man, Danny Boyle, who started this deadly virus, has a very characteristic style and the previous delivery was very British. Fresnadillo has eliminated that as slow pace and that environment so a the Mad Max to turn London into a land ravaged, apocalyptic and now, razed to the ground, all this in more rhythmic form and course, racing and a spectacular soundtrack. It is entertaining and all enjoyment that passes as a sigh, two characteristics that antojaban impossible in this summer.Six months after the events recounted in the first, the American army has taken London and narrows areas where going to be repopulated the city. The city reach Andy and Scarlet (Rose Byrne), the sons of Don (Robert Carlyle), which have lived the tragedy of the appearance of the virus. Not to say that everything will start, but you will have to find out how.Do this film contains all the elements to become a classic, and no doubt enter the annals of? sequels very at the height of his original?. The initial 15 minutes are impressive tension and already it lays groundwork for what you see throughout the remaining minutes, it is action to not stop. A series of fireworks that has nothing to envy to the catastrophic blockbusters put the icing on the cake. Hair-raising me were when Don starts the race chased by a few undead. Is the scene of?Intact? through the trees, improved 100%.Terror puts it the darkness, the hopelessness of the inhabitants of London, the unexpected leader of the zombies, and the anguish that anytime someone will bite and voila!, are lost. Without having a minimum current gore fan, the few viscera and mutilation that appear in the film fit perfectly with what is counting at that time. This means that it is not used the blood for free, something that is simple but little respected in the current movies.A second flawless Act and a final of those that you are engraved in the memory put Fresnadillo in the crosshairs of terror of quality and I am secure that he will not go unnoticed in the USA. Carlyle is perfect. Rose Byrne is incredible and the kid, an irresponsible of volume and pork loin with Madrid shirt, has one more than successful debut.But everything has a fault, and here is very clear: the camera. Do do I remember that a few months ago we hang a preview of the film saying something like that? the action scenes were shot with a camera on top of a dog?. True at all. Sometimes much movement is sickening, and in key scenes would be welcome if the director put on a tripod, or a crane, or something other than the steady-cam to taste better what happens? but more gives me, I repeat? do 28 weeks later?!!! It is the cane!"Come, fill the cinemas for so mustios with so much tedious trilogy, to enjoy with the zombies made in Fresnadillo and patiently wait for the DVD edition of the Assembly of the director, this has to be born!"$·/***.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4160

Jeremy Fox

En el valle de Elah

muchocine

The screenplay by Paul Haggis is a genuine Marvel and again, shows that we have one of the best writers of cinema of the present.

One of platitudes to talk about cinema is to say that the only thing that needs a director to make a good movie from a good script is not to mess up. "In the Valley of Elah" (In the Valley of Elah) is a good example of such a good movie. And is that the screenplay by Paul Haggis is a true wonder and proves, once again, that is one of the best writers of cinema of the present. Everything fits, every small seemingly insignificant detail has its importance in the history and is not since there not by chance or to fill in minutes. In just a couple of scenes we perfectly drawn to the characters and their motivations. A joy.Perhaps aware that higher criticism to "Crash", unfair in my opinion, were due to the grandstanding of some scenes, just my favorites, here Haggis chooses to go unnoticed as director and let that history passes before our eyes without drawing attention. It shows thereby be able to direct without stridency and elegance which, together with its enormous capacity as a writer, predicts one of the most interesting races of the current Hollywood.Some be thinking that I'm missing a paw in my reasoning and are right. Despite having the solid pillars of an excellent script and good management, a film can unravel if the interpretations are not at the height. In the end are the actors that us has those emotions that the author has written for their characters.In this regard you can rest assured because "In the Valley of Elah" interpretations are at the height of his screenplay. All children, including Susan Sarandon makes one minor role that expected but that leaves a mark, are frankly well and you could not highlight Josh Brolin above Jason Patric or any other.Which Yes stresses upon them is Charlize Theron, which continues to grow as actress and you hold the type the real King of the function which is none other than Tommy Lee Jones. Veteran actor performed here one of his best performances and that, for him, i.e. much. Their close-up, their looks, we dipped in the emotional whirlwind lives his character. Few actors in the world can make a display like that he performs in this film. Only by him would be worthwhile seeing her in original version, of course.Having said all that, I'd say that everything is perfect and finish my criticism by saying that we we have the first masterpiece of 2008. But it is not. There are a couple of details that I do not end quite convince. The first is a bit ambiguous to explain but can be summed up easily: the first hour and some movie I like and catch me more than the final half-hour. It is not that in no time it becomes boring, because only with enjoy the already it would be impossible to aburrise, but the end me does not come with the same effectiveness as the rest of the tape.The other aspect that not me convection at all has to do with two scenes featuring both by Tommy Lee Jones, the American flag-related and seem stuck with shoehorn with the sole purpose of sending a message to the Viewer. Especially enforced the second of them, in which the message becomes so obvious that almost annoying.However, the virtues outweigh the defects and I can recommend without fear "in the Valley of Elah" as one of the first films of the year you "must see". Although it is only for those who enjoy "Crash" can confirm the talent of Haggis and those who hated his previous film to discover if they condemned him prematurely or going you to hate forever.Final rating: 8 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2457

Caruco

Un engaño de lujo

muchocine

Do few masterpieces has given the genre in recent years, and?A hoax of luxury? It is not an exception. Nothing of genius, but at least, a more than decent so long-suffering romantic comedy genre film.

Make a comedy is not thing of laughter. Or resorting to humor easier and thick, to the more trite script or to treat most of the characters as if they were stupid. Few masterpieces it has given the genre in recent years, and "A deception of luxury" is no exception. Nothing of genius, but at least, a more than decent so long-suffering romantic comedy genre film.With a mise en scène as elegant as effective, is very consistent with the happy story of a fortune seekers (Audrey Tautou) who loves to flirt with billionaires pulling to lesbians, rather than to live well, to spend all what make you available to your Visa; and his? affair? with the bartender of a hotel (Gad Elmaleh) who will end up taking the role of Gigolo maintained by another ricachona widow (Adam Marie-Christine) only for approaching his true beloved Golden part of the Cote d'Azur.The touch Blake Edwards and almost (I repeat, what of almost) of other masters of the classical comedy as Lubitsch, plans in the mind of its director, Pierre Salvadori, which is converting, with the permission of Maya, in the great French hope in the field of comedy of entanglements and misunderstandings. It was unveiled with the estimable "You first", at that time with Daniel Auteil and Sandrien Kiberlain as protagonists, and here goes one step further in its light treatment, but not without good taste and talent.It gives us a little surprise that also boasts an Audrey Tautou willing to leave behind the lengthened shadow of Amélie and that, true to its name, the Audrey, seems newly out of "Breakfast at Tiffany 's". A delicious creature willing to sell his body to the highest bidder, be not his solitary soul, lurching and ignoring the pleasures of the heart.Audrey, the Tautou is splendid; his partner, the actor of Moroccan origin Gad Elmahed ("the game of the idiots", "The train of life"), knows to give the replica without resorting to the topical interpretive excesses grotesque grimacing, jerks verborreas or trompazos everywhere, but also all the contrary; and the side do not seem mere stupid comparsas. In addition, the invention entertains and works.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2747

José A. Peig

La última legión

muchocine

We have a film saturated with topics and plagiarism to its precedents, not you can say much more than what could be said about any movie made minimally, to view, enjoy awhile, and forget forever.

New twist to the Arthurian myth, from an idea inspired by the novel of Manfredi, tells us the wars between Romans and barbarians from a mythological perspective, without concern for historical accuracy, with which this will be a minimum factor when it comes to qualify a product has nothing new to contribute to gender and which aims to establish themselves with a certain commercial appeal imitating some of the films that most impact commercial have had in recent years.Specifically, with regard to the characterization of characters and the argument, baby trilogy the Lord of the rings by Peter Jackson or the phantom menace (or also from Pirates of the Caribbean), and thus see a Ben Kingsley who interprets a new Merlín-Gandalf-Quigong-jinn and the child actor Colin Firth - Frodo Baggins-Anakin Skywalker representing the chosen that will restore the Roman hegemony according to the prophecy of the day. I.e., a hodgepodge of magic, pseudohistory and philosophy cheap stuck with the sole purpose of entertain nothing demanding viewers. And the truth is that Doug Lefler achieves a film for a decent pastime without absurdities that are too ridiculous or excessive pretentious ornaments, a simple story told through a discreet and conventional visual style battles reminiscent of the style of Jackson in the two towers and the final strikes on the eternal theme of the need to believe in heroes and legends.It is obvious, however, that we are dealing with a film saturated with topics and plagiarism to its precedents, not you can say much more than what could be said about any movie made minimally, to view, enjoy awhile, and forget forever.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4252

Victor Bilbao

El rey de los cowboys (Go west)

muchocine

Very good film of Buster Keaton, misunderstood in his time as contained more serious elements as humorous divertimento, or at least that not must take a joke.

"A young man not found work in his hometown, travels to New York in search of a future better, but within minutes of his arrival, is overwhelmed by the life of the big city and decides to try his luck elsewhere." It falls from a train near a ranch and becomes a cowboy very special. "Very good film of Buster Keaton, misunderstood in his time as contained more serious elements as humorous divertimento, or at least that not must take a joke." In reality, and thus have much thought / wear/ACE ACE, is not a pure western, because it would have by law, which included in the genre of comedy, and not comedy but the comic film, that is different. However, and because of that is also a western and this is a blog of this genre, I include it. Without more.Consists of three distinct but complementary, parts to each one better. It is said to have inspired beautiful poems Spanish great poet Rafael Alberti is a heartfelt work and with poetry in spades, which contains a smart dissertation, hilarious and imaginative, about the attempt of the human being for the realization of their dreams and the importance of the destination in the evolution and future of the same.The cowboy nice, absent-minded, but deeply honest and honored, timorous but determined to succeed in a world in principle very alien to its natural habitat, but that will dominate it for their perseverance and somewhat lucky.A film to recover, which meant an economic cost in the shooting far superior to the agreed in principle between Keaton and Joe Schenk, famed producer. The reason for the high cost of production was a cow!. The cow "Brown eyes", the Holstein breed, chosen between the herd by the own Keaton because he believed would be more ready than their peers. Soon they realized that it was as awkward as the others, but insisted teach tricks and to behave in a set. Thus, and in the midst of a blistering heat, not in vain were filmed those scenes in the middle of the desert of Kingdom, Arizona (USA), taking even careful to wrap the camera with ice so that the tape is not melted, I say so, Keaton gave him carrots to the cow and brought him first with a cable, then with a string and end with a thread.But this was not what made them lose more time, but the cow you entered the zeal and there was no way that "focus". "They presented" a nice bull but this was rejected. There was no choice but to wait to move to the hot and continued shooting.Joe Schenk, the producer, when learned what had made such filming exclaimed very angry: "That's Keaton" He will "If there is a way of making a film, find" it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3655

Sandra Ríos

Encantada: La Historia de Giselle

muchocine

The story of Princess Giselle is something as well as the version of Barbie and Ken, a world penetrable and understandable to 100% by those created through the rib of Adam.

What is new and arguably original of the film is in the form as trasmutan these beings inanimate to our reality, using New York as scenario, that by the way this year has been the space of several movies like Bee Movie, the Bourne Ultimatum, hard kill 4 among others, with a fairly powerful story with that in addition to fun and trasnportarnos to a magical world planted in ourIt aims to outline the lost innocence, the harshness and our reality cares to deliver us a message of reconciliation and love. And it is that despite transform these characters of fairy tales characters of flesh and blood, the magic retains and becomes a mixture of realism and fantasy between two totally different worlds. The hostile is combined with pure and affectionate feelings of these beings. Who plays Princess Giselle, we are talking about the actress Amy Adams, it makes a really charming and convincing role that in my view takes all the credits of this film. Without doubt, a perfect choice of the director and that it also confirms why has been so acclaimed and award-winning by various associations of film in the United States critics. Especially the highlight to it, because others shortly and some nothing I liked such as James Mardsen who plays Prince Edward. Although some highlights the performance of Susan Sarandon, who plays the evil Narizza, a witch that most excels by its modernism in the makeup and costumes that really liked, that by his interpretation that Sarandon enjoys little Parliament on the tape. On this occasion the evil character is far from being an ugly Witch of more macabre fairy tales and its characterization on this occasion comforting with this character, making it look nice and even beautiful.Another of the work of the director, Kevin Lima with this his fourth animated film and Disney, was the achieve the proper balance between the various genres in which enchanted transits: romantic comedy, comedy-drama, animation and music. All these ingredients with a ágill pace and argued that it manages to keep expectant and entertaining the public in this magical journey.But, Encantada turns out to be a completely white and tender film that becomes limited and worthy to be seen and admired by the female followers of Disney. These features are carried to such an extent, that I really think can get to annoy your audience both child and adult male. The story of Princess Giselle is something as well as the version of Barbie and Ken, a world penetrable and understandable to 100% by those created through the rib of Adam. In this regard, readers I will give or will remove the reason with their comentariosl.Although it has not been my total pleasure, the truth is that this film turned more into a tribute of yesterday, has managed to raise a little more than 105 million dollars in its almost 3 weeks of Billboard with an undetermined budget.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2825

Dragon negro

Ovejas Asesinas

muchocine

Totally crazy, wild and surreal comedy full of crappy special effects and blood to navigate and hilarious characters.

This film is already another story and what we have here is a pure and hard and outdated more comedy. A young man returns to his hometown in Australia after suffering a childhood trauma and panic now an excessive and irrational sheep. He travels to sell his share of the farm to his brother, who has been with the family business after his father's death. Brother intends to develop a new kind of sheep through experience genetic, but something just coming evil and an epidemic that turns to both them sheep in violent killer is seizing the town.Totally crazy, wild and surreal comedy full of crappy special effects and blood to navigate and with some hilarious characters, attention to the herbs which aims to solve everything based on natural remedies. A small downturn in rhythm is inevitable in the second half of the film, before the final Savage, but it is an understandable and salvageable bug. I personally enjoyed much more and I have more fun with this film than with the previous. To you have fun and a laugh.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2112

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Réquiem por un sueño

muchocine

Fascinating descent to the underworld of drugs. A fantastic vehicle to operationalize the Visual resources of a formidable director.

This it will of ageing in a filthy room only when the children have gone and you only have a television and a refrigerator. It will also of dreams: because nobody wants to die in an ancient building of Coney Island and there are methods to trick the reality and our fantasy to acquire flight and blind us. Requiem for a dream is the toughest loneliness portrait film can give except the closure of Edmundo Dantés in the island of If. In this story Daronofsky does not seek patterns in the ridiculous twists of the bag and passes to Mystic with the phonetics of the names of God to find happiness in the arcane Symphony of mathematics in the world. That made in Pi, the Pearl in black and white that left us halfway between disbelief and fascination. In this case, the author returns to the Holy Grail of the human soul, seeking happiness unstoppable. It gives the same that comes from a chute of heroin or a television program. The characters of the film fatigue shadows in search of light, but not catch up. None is happy and we know that you will not find that happiness in the film. All are addicted to something: drugs or television programming, but both elements are evidence of his solitude, of its abandonment. Aronofsky conceived the film as a compendium fragmented images that matrimonian perfectly with the tortured and also Sub-Division brain of all actors. Some lose sanity by excess of drug. The mother (an absolutely perfect Ellen Burstyn) is placed with television contests and the Pilgrim idea recover the figure that had as a young man to power flush mounted in a red dress which represents the malgastada life, sacrificed time. The music of the genius of the electronic Clint Mansell, attached to asphyxiating strings the Kronos Quartet, is one component of the film. For a long time (Oldboy, very recently) not noticed the physical presence of the soundtrack in a film. The final climax cannot be conceived without the disturbed melody that brush the abrupt ending. It is not easy cinema: not so wishes. Digested with difficulty and leaves a number of appalling images in memory. The frantic camera movement, sudden acceleration of the tempo of the images and, above all, dizzying Visual tics that Arofonofsky comes with excessive and imprudent frequency.Fascinating descent to the underworld of drugs. A fantastic vehicle to operationalize the Visual resources of a formidable director.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/700

Alberto Concepción

Infiltrados

muchocine

There is no other than applaud, rejoice and enjoy this film orgasm called 'Infiltrators'.

Impressive. Shocking. Really great. Scorsese has gone. But calm, not as in 'The Aviator'. This time has given us not one, but many lessons of cinema, all within the same movie. Much else you applaud, rejoice and enjoy this film orgasm called 'Infiltrators' had expected this movie and there is no.There is a long list on Mafia films, and although I must admit that I am not the most staunch follower of these films, 'Infiltrated' well he could become a classic. current movies. The drama of the double life that carried out the infiltrators on both sides, their concerns and fears make the extensive (which not excessive) duration of footage not only located without eyes the clock or yawning, but rather the desire to know the outcome of the story grow while enjoying the excellent translation of frames, intelligently confusing.The development of the story does not only increase all the virtues that contains this Ribbon, to reach an end to rise to the occasion (although it can sin, typical in Scorsese's eternal). The truth is that one is left with the feeling that, even ending at any moment of the last fifteen minutes, it is a great finishing touch for excellent film. And it has all the elements to become the film of the year (with permission of 'Children of men'): it is not only the plot (what script!), it is the atmosphere, tension, the hectic pace, the rawness, the dureza.y, the performances, magnificent interpretations. A meeting of quality in the direction and acting work in bringing a complex story.It is time to recognize the merits of Leonardo DiCaprio, which does an excellent job, and who are thus definitely falls from the list of idols of quinceañeras. Jack Nicholson is as pez en el agua doing what he likes: be a perfect bastard, to their anchas.y in their efforts. Matt Damon shows all his skills (once again) and confirms why is someone to take into account. And or if it were, the Pleiad of side is splendid: from Mark Wahlberg to Martin Sheen, all make this film (or at least should) be remembered to gather so much waste of talent.Perhaps this the Scorsese expected the Academy to give it one (his first) estatuilla.y whether finally cannot thus be committed one of the greatest injustices in the world of cinema.This is yours, Martin.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3801

Alvaro Oliva

Lío embarazoso

muchocine

Comparing this film with the rest of proposals, it is not below, that comedy is not in the best of times, so can be disappoint lovers and cinéfagos to wait a good thing...

Preceded by a few good reviews, comes the new proposal of Judd Apatow shared many ingredient with "Supersalídos" (one of the surprises of the season), but that a difference of "Embarrassing mess" fails to live up to my expectations.Despite having very good moments, both humorously and romantically, and actors as interesting as Katherine Heigl and Seth Rogen, history doesn't just materialize at all.It is very good one of the phrases pronounced the protagonist at the end, when he sees how his life has been a complete reversal, and the moral if you stop to think about what has been achieved and resulted in random, chance and bad luck on Ben Stone and Alison Scott (the protagonists characters).We also appreciate life in couple, with their pros and cons, but in a later stage and something more adult in formed by Paul Rudd and Leslie Mann. Comparing this film with the rest of proposals, is not below, that comedy is not in the best of times, so can be disappoint lovers and cinéfagos to wait a good thing (more to the first than the latter) but even so, "Embarrassing mess" contains small amounts of love, humor and tenderness, that make that view it does not involve a mistake.As a curiosity, could well find us with a flashback or flashforward (or prequel / sequel) of the lives of the characters of Seth Rogen and/or Jonah Hill in "Supersalidos", seeing what they have become, or will become, as Seth Rogen is would have been able to become police and thus help McLovin, feeling identified with him (as confess the two cops in "Superbad") or Jonah end up being a "fumeta" that does nothing rather than be with colleagues, having lost his best friend and have not been able to go to the same University.In short, ramblings of a film buff/cinéfago.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/215

Cp

Xmen3

muchocine

There to bother a little to adapt it, here the screenwriter read five comics at random and remove a few ideas, nothing more

If you're an aficionado of good action cinema, fantasy, or you just like a good entertainment film, although you have not read the comics, either published or only one loose, then. don't go to see her. If you are a true fan to the x-men and vibrabas only emotion thinking in seeing the dark Phoenix saga in film, then... don't go to see her. If these boring, and not have absolutely nothing to do, then... rent the first part or the second DVD, and Miss Bryan Singer, but do not go to see!.An exaggeration? It may be. But it is critical that it occurs to me do now that I have come home, and I get to write about the film. Worst thing is that already occurred to me type it while saw the film, disconnected which was what was happening on the screen.As film, you don't have rhythm, it is completely impossible to find a common thread that interests you, which bring in aloft to the Viewer, a good against evil, or a save the world. Something that is essential in this type of film. We will not see these films to hear intelligent dialogues or large arguments. We want to give us an excuse to risk the life, forget the girl that love to run to fight or at least a reason to get our life in the estate. We forget that we are sitting in a movie theater, and continue to maximum or William Wallace with a sword in his hand. And no, that nothing.The truth, X-Men 3 has nothing of the sort. Above, if you wanted a few characters to make you vibrate for them, although you think not more than eat popcorn, then either. A woodpecker you care what happens to them (especially since the mystical her depart from the film in a scene stupid and I if not this mystical, do not want to know anything, hala) or let go. So, a disaster.And if you're a surrendered and unconditional fan of the X-Men, better not read sipnosis from the entrance of the cinema. Stupid history and destroy the dark Phoenix Saga, become one. As the lack of blood (film for children and breast, that go with them to monitor that their children see) that Wolverine lose the grace. How to remove characters that the director does not like, stupid ways. Like putting free fights that make no sense. Get a scene with A Sentinel, only to appear in the trailer and entice fans (I swear I think that is why this that scene, to bring it into the trailer and nothing else). How to change the personalities of the characters of the comic, in all the cases for the worse. Come on, that is a horrible adaptation. That if even a comic and not a worthy of a Nobel novel, there to bother to adapt it, not transcribe her exactly, which is impossible, but if a little bother to adapt it, and here the screenwriter read five comics at random and remove a few ideas, nothing more.Summary: The worst of the three films. As Miss a story, having no clear things. It seems to me watching a famous Conference of Kevin Smith, explaining that the producer wanted to appear Mystica in balls without painting, who had to have many evil mutants dressed as punks, and the bridge of San Francisco had to float in the air. This has left the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2994

Enrique Colmena

Cabeza de muerte

muchocine

It is not, however, a negligible movie?Head of death?: the atmosphere of earthquake terror, splendidly supported in the vast, primordial Irish forests is well achieved, and the action follows with interest.

The seed of "The Blair Witch Project" (by call it somehow) has permeated some of modern horror cinema. Now is the Irish film that dares to do its bit to this already quasi venero within the genre of fear, and do it with some aplomb. Paddy Breathnach us interested in recent years with their entangled comedy thriller "Disorganised crime", and now demonstrates that the terror nor given wrong. As in the usual "Do the project?", here there is also a group of rather hatched guys (sorry for the redundancy?) interned in a forest, for the occasion with the intention of "hang" with psychedelic properties of certain mushrooms of the Earth. But a spineless group eats fungus which should not, one that uncovers usually asleep human faculties as the precognition, or that directly removes any type of inhibition acquired by the social animal which hardly we are. Do all this with a legend in the background, with a kind of reformatory governed by an insane and sadistic monk and a few pupils as to found them at two in the morning just around one corner? The truth is that the film works, within its conventions, reasonably well, with some scenes of percutante tension, such as the death of the memo of the group, or some final moments in the abandoned boarding school. Does shame that Paddy Breathnach at the end her annoy way with a twist with built-in surprise which gives a new perspective, already somewhat forced, as until then us has been seen, abandoning the supernatural explanation by another much more land, even pedestrian? It is not, however, a negligible movie this "head of death": the atmosphere of earthquake terror, splendidly supported in the vast, primordial Irish forests is well achieved, and the action follows with interest, although the viewer knows that, according to the unwritten rules of this type of films with carajotes group in a hostile landscape, they will fall one after another.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3754

Natalia Eseverri

La Búsqueda: El Diario Secreto

muchocine

On many occasions, the second parts were never good, but sometimes you have to try to see that it comes...

On this occasion, the opportunity is worthwhile, especially for those who enjoy the fun adventures that left us the first part of the search. And that which has all the topical ingredients of a film of this genre: ironic prota with dowries of hero, half dumb desired woman to which the ironic prota needs your help, secondary bad fun with clever phrases, and it seems bad until the end makes nonsense that lets you be bad.In any case, this new product from la factoria Bruckheimer, do not lose the hook in the first, you embarcas from the outset with Nicolas Cage in each one of the tracks and are impatient for that to arrive the following. It retains the good humor and good relations between the different characters, which joins a brilliant Helen Mirren.Y also me continues to surprise the large capacity to unite stories that have really happened with the search for amazing treasures, without that seems an unlikely thing, denoting a great work of documentation, which comes from pearls to the history.Espremos that if you reach a third search, not decay tone and good humor and continue entertaining people that we like to escape from the noise with films that entertain us and make us have a good time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1268

Caty

Eragon

muchocine

Marked by a constant in his screenplay instability, it seems that always missing something and that the facts as submitted have been built lightly on paper and on screen.

The less, the struggle of some movie studios for a new success in box office is curious and so I call in the film "stages", that I may understand: premiered a film that breaks all records, became a classic in the history of the seventh art and mark a generation. Act followed, leaving 800 films on the same line and with the same plot and/or technical premises. He spent with Star Wars. spent with Matrix. He spent with the night of the dead living. passed with Seven spent with Terminator. spent with Alien. and of course, it happened with the Lord of the rings. In a way, it's already old history of supply and demand. Sometimes come worthy things, other pure shit and other products that leave you completely indifferent. In this case, and in my opinion, we are in a product which, although for nothing is a by-product, is the typical "bluff" film: adorned in the promotion until the satiety and that viewing is simply an entertaining tape to spend a pleasant time.Adapted from the eponymous play by Christopher Paolini, written in adolescence, the film deals with the story of the Dragon Riders, trained to do good and to protect the people. Men prospered and the cities grew. until that one day was born a boy named Galbatorix. Riders accepted as one more and it exceeded all skill. Equipped with a superior mind and a strong body, he highlighted among all riders. One day, in the darkness of the night, stole a dragon egg and persuaded Morzan, another rider to join the study of magic black and prohibited. Later, in a bloody battle, Galbatorix managed to dominate all and was proclaimed King of all Alagaesia.y here begins our history. Eragon, a simple peasant teen, is a blue stone in the forest and, thinking that it is a wink of good luck, it takes her to his farm. Suddenly, a dragon is born of the "stone" and marks it as its rider: since that time, Eragon makes be revived the myth of the Dragon Riders and becomes a hope against the tyranny of Galbatorix.Marcada by a constant in his screenplay instability, it seems always missing something and that the facts as submitted have been built lightly on paper and on screen. Do not think that Eragon has this evil that many adaptations suffer on their way to the celluloid, where often turns to a book of tropecientas pages into a guioncito covering just two hours of projection. I think that the error comes from the book, which suffers from a lack of originality too alarming: is a story that, although manida, promises and be carried by other paths would have not brought the Viewer to see something so typicalsometimes too typical. Being able to get much more, the film stays in the wake of films that follow to others - as mentioned above-.Anyway, it also has its positive or at least salvables points. The young Edward Speleers has a good stage presence before the cameras and seems to cope well with these. Jeremy Irons, Sienna Guillory and Robert Carlyle do not wrong and give class to this production. Saphira (female Dragon in Eragon) is also superbly built and performed by the dubbers (in the original version, lends it the voice Rachel Weisz). The special effects are interesting and with a competent soundtrack.I hope that the second installment of the series manages to mend the errors of the first and demonstrate that it is more than another one of those franchises and throw-away, despite the hint of a story completely flat (I'm afraid).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1952

Daniel Galindo

La fuente de la vida

muchocine

The sacrifice is here presented as a form of suicide. We don't talk history, nor the characters, but the director to venture into a film that anything upstream.

There are surreal films that have where grab them. This visual poem is that, an elegy, a sort of swan song, so its leaders expect an overwork on our part.Imagine a box that contains metaphors, related philosophical and cultural memories, sensations, errors, images of great beauty, cuts, tears. So is this movie, that fascinate, catches our attention, albeit relying on our waiting to see what route will continue. Perhaps to strengthen this linkage, its argument say that love gives strength for everything, that it is an act of faith, dedication and selflessness and, as such, it has also its victims.After deploying the ideas, here the victim may be public. We are spectators accustomed to a cinematic prose with their spelling and grammatical rules, with their meanings and their interpretations. We we have educated in a 'normal' cinema, with a specific narrative and therefore before anything current proposals, we tend to show us reluctant.The close-ups of Rachel Weisz, the hard background of the relationship between his character and played by Hugh Jackman, plastic's good intentions and rhetoric employed and in some respects sweetened counteracting with predictable of a narrative that not being atypical is more seductive and sins of excessive plastic pedantry. The script, far from surprising, stands out for its simplicity, downside that looking at it favourably, just become curious virtue to emphasize the aesthetic imprint.I would like to make it clear that the third tape from Darren Aronofsky (after Pi and Requiem) by a dream led to me, me picó. They are verbs that I use when I do not know if something convinced me or not: is like watching an abstract painting in a museum. The formal courage is almost always at odds with our own liking, supported on the cultural heritage seized. Therefore it is constructive to remain not airtight to different bets that extracted the most critical side of us.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/908

Ana

El camino de los ingleses

muchocine

Much visual work which unfortunately remains empty. . Chicos guapos with little clothing sunbathing girls swimming in the pool or dancing in the rain. But here everything stays in effect.

It can be summarized in a line: Sun does at the beginning and at the end it rains. The visual style evokes nostalgia, but the beauty remains on a skin. Chicos guapos with little clothing sunbathing girls swimming in the pool or dancing in the rain. But here everything stays in effect, topic and not beyond. If you want a movie with a visual style at the same time refined fresh is better watch "You, me and everyone we know," the film of last year of Miranda July.El "Camino de los ingleses" protagonist is a boy who tells us many times that he wants to be a poet, but not seen in him no indication of passionate blood. The characters here more than talk launch in jerks pedagogical monologues. All very symbolic and very hurry to be literary. He ends up staying in the air, and fails to say anything.Even the symbols with which aims to break the narrative line are topical: a dancer, who will serve your guts in a tray and the scene of the end (do not think that you unveil anything) the boy barefoot across the zebra crossing. Is it that he became one of the Beatles? Therefore, no he deserves it.When appears Victoria Abril is a great pleasure, and up you permeates sweetness and a drop of complexity to his character of last years typing teacher that it plays of seductive. But I am not sure that ends out of the cartoon.Everything is very hyperbolic, hyperbolic, too hyperbolic. Oh, and repetitive. It is excessively literary not to say anything. Now, if make merchandising design objects that appear in the film: clothing, glasses, machine, writing, pianos and desks; I buy everything. Much visual work which unfortunately remains empty.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/774

Lara Croft

El ilusionista

muchocine

Not enough me, hence my sense of guilt. Edward Norton with that stark and concentrated look reminds me more an astigmático than to an exalted illusionist.

How long have to turn a blind eye by no sin of arrogance? It is true that in this blog I have tried poorly to several films because I were comic to a superlative degree when its initial mission was not just the comedy (as proof of this just take a stroll through the category not see). But the goal of any visit to the cinema is usually the mission accomplished satisfaction and pleasure that generates a good movie, sensations that for one reason or another I am not from makes enough (at least with regard to the reviews on this blog). When I published my opinion about the great trick a few weeks ago I did it with the same ideas floating around in my head, but at that time, perhaps only be the first of two similar achievements, wasn't so strong sense of mission not accomplished. With the magician I cannot but feel some guilt to declare that I did not like. Because there are many factors that usually carry a movie to the rating of "Good" or "Very good" in some cases, factors which in this opportunity for me there have been sufficient.Music composed by Philip Glass, rarely so consistent and subtly dosed, photography Dick Pope (the secret of Vera Drake) with delicate cuttlefish who do more than immerse ourselves deeply in the Vienna of 1900 wonderfully set with the design of production of Czech Ondrej Nekvasil.Como always a pleasure seeing Paul Giamatti and can fit not only any shoe that reach you but also clothing (elegant not flashy) Ngila Dickson (the saga of the Lord of) (the rings). so? Then not reached me, hence my fault. Eduard Norton with that stark and concentrated look reminds me more an astigmático that to an exalted illusionist, Jessica Biel little lacks to earn the nickname of Miss gall. If your character is madly in love with the main character, is a well kept secret because there is no chemistry with Norton.Y finally Rufus Sewell as Prince Leopold has so many details of tyrant and dictator as the same great and surprising film illusion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2585

Ramón Balcells

Ratatouille

muchocine

It is not more than a dinner served with a taste of first quality, with a most perfect script and endearing characters. Nothing missing, nothing is.

Like small star of this film, its director Brad Bird has a delicious smell to choose themes (or in the case of the mouse, food). First designed for a family with superpowers really incredible and now a mouse who travels to Paris to finish "Chef" at a famous restaurant. No doubt, this man not may be denied the imagination. Ratatouille to her she would describe as delicious. Following the line of the Incredibles, this film begins with an incoming dish, apparent simplicity and a somewhat cold taste. To encourage the thing, its outcome is like a second exquisite dish that provides a trip through education. And finally, the dessert, no less exquisite, with a final climax really overwhelming. As you will see, the film Bird is not more than a dinner served with a taste of first quality, with a most perfect script and endearing characters. Nothing missing, nothing is. It is perfect, although obviously it is not deep enough to be one work teacher. The message, which never lack, it is impossible to clear: If you want to achieve something and put you effort, you get.At a glance, already is that the film is going to be nice, classic air and with touches of intelligent humor. And I am not disappointed. Moreover, apart from all this, is a very entertaining film, sometimes topical (and surprisingly does not bother, because it is not repetitive or pretentious) and inevitably unforgettable. Already the main batallita home of this lady shows us, somehow, what is going to be. During his stay in Paris (or virtually all), our protagonist is evolving in a progressive manner, while the young chef makes it (also it could be called protagonist). And is that both protagonists (now yes) are, in fact, one's own. Does not need to say why, already see you. At a glance it seems the typical film for children and no one else, but this assertion is wrong. As increasingly the case, this film of animation can enjoy it equally adults and children, although this time gags are not as sophisticated or hidden as in others (ahem)(Homer). And the truth is that we would appreciate a film like this to be less pedantic than some others (Shrek 2 seems to me great, but find that some of their adult jokes abound). In Ratatouille adult intelligence is not noted, because the Viewer already knows that it is there. However, it is also intelligent in the technical sense. The quality of the animation is really impressive (only have to observe the movements of the characters or sequences of action (with the camera in "hand"), which increasingly surprised me more (if you have luck, maybe you can see in the film the teaser trailer for Wall-E).) I must admit that Pixar has surpassed once again with this impeccable Odyssey of this tooth called Remy and its relationship with the environment of the kitchen (well done).The characters are all credible, endearing and intelligent. From the outset that Remy, mouse, you like and is therefore more pleasant to follow the plot of the film. Not wasted at all the young chef, who also, along with the other Cook, get us we create them and we made nice. But for me, the greatest achievement of the film is the food critic, a sleazy character who initially acts as bad but the tastar recites one of the best thoughts I have heard in theaters for some time, the famous "ratatouille" on the art of being critical and all the consequences. Ratatouille may not be the perfect work mouse creates at the end, although I don't think he meant it to be. This is a great movie, but unfortunately fails to be perfect because it is animated, and therefore can not be as deep and complex as a footage for no animation. But if we focus in the field of the drawings, we could consider this, best film seen in long and, without doubt, the best animated film of what it far this year. Absolutely essential.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4133

Bruji

El amor en los tiempos del cólera

muchocine

Mike Newell uses an unbeatable international cast to reach the heart of the most beautiful romantic story ever written.

Intelligent and faithful adaptation of the novel by García Márquez. Mike Newell uses an unbeatable international cast to reach the heart of the most beautiful romantic story ever written. In images, a song of love for Colombia. "It was inevitable: the smell of bitter almonds always reminded him of the fate of the hindered loves". Much rain has fallen from that afternoon of August that by chance, as happen the big findings in life, I discovered "The love in the time of cholera". The passage of time managed to blur the memory of a woman of strong character that I never understood. It is not easy to understand that concrete façades are sensitive hearts safe haven at such a young age. Much to my regret, also evaporated the romantic ideal of pure love that survives only in the difficult art that captures the soul in the role. But twenty years were not enough to erase the image of a courtyard in which grow endless tropical flowers, or the freshness of sunset often soñadas on the Magdalena river, or the smell of the market of my retina in which Fermina Daza iterate the end of an illusion. Without knowing it, forever, I had fallen in love with Colombia.Joe Wright, Atonement director and one of the promises of the current film, knew how to sum up the challenge posed by the film adaptation of a contemporary classic of literature in an accurate sentence: "each novel has as many versions as readers". A reflection that turns into miracle chance that viewers, critics, writers and filmmakers - all readers - coincide in the same vision. The controversy is served and my question about the degree of infatuation of Mike Newell, satisfactorily resolved. "Think about love as a State of grace is not a means for nothing, but an origin and an end in itself". The indent of Ronald Harwood, winner of an oscar for the Piano, can be described as intelligent and faithful. Fidelity, so often promised the author with the solemnity of the oath of Florentino, entails the realization of an almost literal adaptation, which starts by the end of the story and back in an intense flashback, which is the crux of the plot, to return to the first sequence and address the outcome. Within the development, imposes a linear narrative structure to give consistency to this "go and come from hell" which are subjected to the protagonists. The phrases memorable novel they transcribed to the screen with absolute devotion, and try a fanciful characters flirting and stage to overcome the latent of postcolonial folletinesco saga threat which could be reduced the search for love throughout life in time of war and epidemics, when he is stripped of the complex internal travel that recreates the prose clean award Nobel. "It is life and not death that has no limits." Intelligence, for its part, is perceived in two cinematographic licenses which are incorporated into the story. Firstly, the presentation in dialogue - never occurring - a romance that is collected by the pen of steel and the typewriter in endless letters of round-trip; Unfortunately, written in English. On the other hand, bet brave to offer a change of actor for the main character. It passes from very interesting Unax Ugalde to Javier Bardem always effective, not attending for reasons of age, but the purposes espoused by Luis Buñuel in his last film, that dark object of desire. You need a Florentine I bet, emerged from the eyes with those who only know look at the heart, with a diffuse physical traits that are lost among the multitude of the midnight mass, and that it does not correspond with the real Florentine, the meat and bone, which Fermina sees for the first time face to face, in the market to become convinced that everything has been an illusion, the infatuation of a soul without a face. Impeccable production design invoice, his elegant Court, the exquisite work of makeup and costumes, the successful international casting, the art direction that remains attentive to the most insignificant details, such as which fixed his attention on the cages in which carry babies for River trips; and the sensible implementation of a craftsman, Mike Newell, far from being brilliant, is always correct, make love in the time of cholera in a film of unforgettable moments that stifle the fear of the writer, which took several years to be convinced to accept this Anglophone version. "Fifty-three years, seven months and eleven days with their nights". Intimate talks at the lighthouse, the eyes of the satyr who knows that the evil of infidelity is not if only perpetrated with the body, the excessive love of a latina mother (the impressive lady of Brazilian theater, Fernando Montenegro), the icy gaze and outbursts of wrath of the excellent Giovanna Mezzogiorno, and the unmistakable voice of Shakira visiting places of Cartagenaweed in the jungle, the mighty river, the port city of Barranquilla. they cause a shiver that cloudy look. And is that, admitting the impossibility of doing justice to the insurmountable works of Don Gabriel, it is not less true that the human quality of the Colombian people, the colorful spirit of their land, the atmosphere warm and fragrant, passionate, who now live in the novel, too, finally, do so in the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3589

Silvia Giner

Zeitgeist

muchocine

This documentary slaps us with a reality to open our eyes to those who still do not believe what is happening. Now our job is to get "how to do" a revolution.

Zeitgeist, is the title of a controversial documentary that makes hairs are put end to a reality that nobody wants to see per that is there. It is a documentary distributed over the internet and that you can enjoy on their official website that it is subtitled in several languages.Based on a great quote from Jimi Hendrix: "When the power of love overcome the love of power, the world known peace," Zeitgeist shows three different viewpoints on religion (Church), the survival of the fittest in society and power.This documentary slaps us with a reality to open our eyes to those who still do not believe what is happening. "They must find it difficult." those who have taken authority as truth rather than truth as authority "Produced by Peter Joseph, was created non-profit to inspire people who begin to look at the world from a more critical perspective and to understand that things are not as most people believe." The information in Zeitgeist is the result of a year-long research. The period of research and the basic sources used/referred to in the same andthe Interactive Transcript includes the official site.So successful projects and recomenedables as it is I do have wanted to bring to light some documentary that I have saved and that will make that one shaking more than.After that our job is to get "how to do" or "manage" a revolution. This is the message. Reveals you, believe in you should, while you may believe in others, ye shall be yours, sed free.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1284

Oscar Cantero

Cry Wolf

muchocine

New contempt for American industry to the intelligence of the viewers, who does not offer more than trash canned in metres from celluloid whose best destination would be the serving of food to a herd of marranos.

With a slightly more original plot than usual in this type of film waste, Cry Wolf is another by-product of the decadent and abominable part of the American motion picture industry geared to produce a crappy after another for adolescents whose intelligence despises and offends constantly, offering trash in way to do films? they lack the most basic logics and are limited to be a succession of shouts, viscera, deaths and absurd persecution in which a type who walks step light reaches people running desperately. As I have said before, your script has some touches of originality, although insufficient to convert this aberration in a film. Full of topics throughout all your footage (the phone with voice distorsionador, the hooded, suspicions among the hysterical screams, etc.), is shameful above reach our country two years too late, and to do so to undermine the possibility of screening films of truth which will be condemned to ostracism and rotting in warehouses. Meanwhile, this pigswill, however difficult it is to believe, will probably have a decent collection thanks to the horde of teenagers that go to the rooms to hang out, and fortunately will pay you little attention.Of the actors, very little to say, except that is striking the pathetic presence of decadent Jon Bon Jovi, endeavoured to appear on the big screen though it to ridicule. Cry Wolf is not a thriller, nor is it a film of terror, or suspense, or nothing at all. It is just an hour and a half run away.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1042

Ramón Balcells

Alatriste

muchocine

Alatriste has seemed a fairly slow and predictable film, but first and foremost, has to acknowledge that it is crafted production.

I have never attracted the blockbusters, and if I have to be more clear, the Spanish films in general even less (with exceptions, clear). And it is that this year we have received a Spanish blockbuster with the name of Alatriste. When I found out that you were going to shoot her, I never thought that a star of such caliber (and also American) as Viggo Mortensen could play this super. sorry, Spanish anithéroe. And Yes, the case was that the main character of the Lord of the rings was hired to give life to the character of Arturo Pérez Reverte.¿Y the director? Therefore nothing more and nothing less than Agustín Díaz Yanes, whose name it knew well few. Anyway, that Director without news of God not be him went nothing more than put together five books of Mr Reverte and convert them in one movie. The result has not been entirely disastrous, but could have been much better. No, do not think that it is badly made or none of it, what you will. If Visual effects and production are a jewel. What fails is the script. But well, I cannot argue either that it is a rubbish such as torrent or things like. It is correct. I had never read a book of Captain Alatriste. Well, I could say that he had not done because the adventures of swordsmen have never me too interested. And the fact is that the reason because I wanted to see the movie version was the following: the spectacular cast. And is who had no reason, that Viggo Mortensen he accompanied all Spanish actors: Eduardo Noriega, Blanca Portillo, Unax Uglade, Elena Anaya, Ariadna Gil, Juan Echanove, Javier Cámara, Eduard Fernández, Pilar López de Ayala and Pilar Bardem. Who does not like you see a film with that cast? Well to anyone. And the case is that I was very excited, and also if it was Reverte, I find a great writer. But, as it was also presumably, became production more expensive than has been done in Spain, and like it or not, it always hurts the quality of the film on the script. And as also is presumably, this happened, and what really startles in Alatriste is not the script (or less!) but the production design. Okay, we can say that also can evaluate a film by its effects and decorations, but for me, the most important thing is that it is well structured, and Alatriste is not. First of all, say that Diaz Yanes seems to take for granted your knowledge about the work and the time (well, this last also find logical). The truth is that I have to say, also, that the beginning is really good (which is very important in this type of movies). It all starts with a silent battle (at times) in a very disturbing atmosphere. Without knowing just the characters appear, by what can be seen, Diego Alatriste and Eduardo Noriega, along with others who nobody knows so far. Well, just say that the beginning is not to present the characters, pretty good. And so is the rest of the footage, we cannot say that it is too clear (set in liosa sequence of the ambush on the boat). It is too cut and barely gives you time to think about the stories of the characters, which are certainly not very well drawn, but excellently performed. The choice of Viggo Mortensen the meeting, into what is, quite right. His disconcerting voice, such as South American accent, makes her more interesting role, and is that Lord Aragorn also a great actor (as well has shown us in A history of violence). The rest of the cast, as I have said, do, and very well, what they have to. The only one which most you have had special mania, Eduardo Noriega, is precisely the interpreter makes it worse, or rather, more sobreactuadamente.Alatriste has seemed a fairly slow and predictable film, but first and foremost, has to acknowledge that it is crafted production. The picture is really good, it has to be said. But what I hope, is that the nomination for the Academy Award as best foreign non-English language film to return or Salvador. Anyway, that has not disappointed me, but isn't the very best this month, much less.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3131

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Oceans 13

muchocine

Already burned, the franchise of the thief Danny Ocean cannot be more than itself: wreak, boredom, absolute narrative collapse. In addition, notable moments, entertainment at times.

The Clooney feast & friends has already hit bottom: the artistic city of some of the icons of the current film is not enough. While Ocean's eleven was a pleasant entertainment, an updated version of a 70s hit where the Rat Pack of Sinatra and Dean Martin consisted them to casinos with a chic, glamorous and bored air burst. Soderbergh slips in this digital gadget because their characters are analog. Not write I: is part of a dialogue of the film itself. Go and intelligent suspense of the first delivery now becomes a simulacrum of suspense, in a kind of aesthetic and narrative orgasm that never comes. This dissatisfaction lastra the good intentions of the tape, which exhibits the hooks of the above mathematical skillfully and improves (not difficult) the results of the second. Internal speech: Soderbergh WINS $ to finance the film indie, their whims, the daydreams does not sponsor anyone. Schizopolis or Bubble, which I have not seen, are (in their words) film that likes to do. It does not bother him, but is left to pollute by apathy and ultimately exhibits its mediocrity. As it progresses the footage, we think that there will not be climax, theft will be a bluff, which characters are tired and that the actors seem to be a bunch of friends that have been placed in half of the glitz of casinos and bright lights for pocketing some bitches at the time how much you want to enjoy. The simplistic tone of this divertimento no obvious some brilliant moments (Matt Damon in the role of proboscis Secretary of a Chinese owner of an airspace or Clooney and Pitt touched before a programme of Ophra on television), although unfortunately stored in memory moments are the bad guys: an Al Pacino without motivation, a plan of theft without grace or objectan Andy Garcia mechanical and elusive.External speech: Soderbergh loses nombradía. The food film Clint Eastwood or Steven Spielberg and Francis Ford Coppola have always done can also be here represented. Soderbergh can afford these industrial rants, but his serious film, which you like, is not to throw rockets.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3332

Hombre Lobo

The invasion

muchocine

It is the version of the ultracuerpos that promotes less capabilities (this including the unpardonable absence of true distinctive element of the series) and its second reading is too put in evidence.

To be the fourth version of a familiar story, invasion (2007) seems to not have learned the lesson very well. What had to be the entry into the German director Oliver Hirschbiegel Hollywood stays in a medium adaptation which not only is more liberties taken in the original novel by Jack Finney, they even failed to reach the minimum of enjoyment of gender which Yes knew how to get their three previous versions. To what extent that is blame the director or producers who got the hand (which is Joe Silver, father of this creature) do not know. I can only say the result is well below that expected, and that the ultracuerpos seem to have suffered its first defeat serious in its invasion of the Tierra.Al start from ground already known to all, invasion does not need large explanatory Preludes: we know from the outset that an alien race is taking our planet by assault, and does it so in the form of a virus that spreads after the fall to the land of one of our own space artifacts. The virus spreads by our system (something that the film crush and again in unnecessary computer sequences) and makes human clones extraterrestrial. The main of the affected cities is Washington D.C., place where the Carol Benell psychiatrist (played by Nicole Kidman in the change of sex of the protagonist) discovers a strange paranoia that makes them believe that their loved ones are no longer the same in their patients. The rest already know: the Replicants aliens soon begin to increase in number and put pressure on the human, who must flee while looking for a cure.It is in their already known instances where invasion gets its best fruits. Of itself, the fact that expiration date in a big city makes clear that it is the version of Phillip Kauffman (released in 1978) which has served as a major source of inspiration, something that is noticeable in those scenes in which the invasion is taking place in front of the noses of the character, as well as the presence of Veronica Cartwright in a small role. Also, those moments in which the ultracuerpos make group presence and harass the doctor are quite good and intense, but this hardly can be considered an own merit because that is something that we have already seen three other times. Still achieved big moments, especially those concerning a murderously untapped Daniel Craig whose participation is reduced to little more than the guaperas on duty.Where Yes fails this version of the ultracuerpos in their already very guided action scenes, that on several occasions seem tucked with shoehorn and are not very short story, so note to leagues that were an imposition of the study to ease the pace of the film. Such scenes almost always confined to a Chase drive quite poor and repetitive, in which we see the aliens behave like smart Zombie (simile that is reinforced in the form as the virus spreads), something which clashes with already apparently. In addition, the typical plot of the child in danger charged too much relevance and distracts the film to delve into the subtext of conformity and egalitarianism that "seems" to be the center of the story, a subtext that addresses the perennial presence of the conflict on the human race and, in a way quite interesting initially, linking to this film with other classics as ultimatum to Earth (1951). Pity that, come to the end, the "message" of the film becomes too obvious and seems to be highlighted so that even the most palurdo of the room can give account. The outcome, because of this, is easy and outlets, a far cry from the one seen in other versions, even in its immediate predecessor, Abel Ferrara premiered in 1993. invasion, therefore, won't be a film easily forgettable, perhaps remarkable only as a vehicle of exploitation of Nicole Kidman. As regards gender, it is the version of the ultracuerpos that promotes less capabilities (this including the unpardonable absence of true distinctive element of the series) and its second reading is too put in evidence. In short, until the remake coming.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1571

Mario

The host

muchocine

Despite being advertised as such, comparing it directly on the posters with Alien or shark, the truth is that the experience of The host far than they were those movies of the 1970s.

A new production of the distant South Korea rang with force at the last festival of Sitges. Bong Joon-Ho, responsible for the outstanding Memories of murder (which I've not yet seen) presented on this occasion what could appear to be a monster-movie of life. Despite being advertised as such, comparing it directly on the posters with Alien or shark, the truth is that the experience of The host far than they were those movies of the 1970s.The differences between the Eastern approach and Hollywood, to which we are obviously more used, are obvious. The pace of the film, as in almost all citations with slanted eyes film, is at least strange: I wouldn't say that slow, at least if we adhere to the idea that we have of this concept in these parts, it is not dynamic and fast-paced as he recited the poster, comparing it with those two masterpieces. The host has a Cadence paused and anomalous, quite hard to describe but easily identifiable for any follower of the film in that area. This long creature appears very soon in full light of the Sun, forgetting the possible dramatic tension focused on the own Monster and sliding the development in other directions, clear symptom of what we find.The sense of humor that handles is difficult to follow, and laughter that sounded in the room were probably due to ridiculous that we are certain comedic situations.These factors, along with some other more, made that the film I became hopelessly boring at times, without be able to avoid me feel alien to the way of telling a story that has been proposed.However, apart from the absence of embellishment and the amazement that generate characters, is no less true that the real shots of the film and its real interest are not exactly going out there. Social criticism and the direct attack on American policy are, without any doubt, the real objectives of the director. As was the case in Godzilla, Joon-Ho used the pretext of a monster mutagenic to wield a political satire and complaint to the brave.The simile with the war of Iraq or the anti-terrorist pre-emptive strikes are very clear: A military base of the USA pour chemicals into a river, which later will cause a disaster in the form of mutant fish. The scenes are reminiscent of the CIA training people like Bin Laden or the initial support for Saddam, planting the River with waste for later harvest monsters.Years later, with the vermin in full swing punishing the natives, some absurd sign makes them deduce that there is a virus dangerous for the international community to weapons of mass destruction? Concerning this passage is absolutely brilliant the sequence in which an American military doctor finds evidence of the virus in the behavior of the protagonist. Finally the USA involved in the country riding a chicken that will eventually take that solve the same civilians who suffer the consequences. The final apology of the President are fully revealing.This message, together with the presentation of one family any together, despite their differences, face adversity, distance to this film of the like and, in my opinion, get that some own, perhaps, of the immense distance intercultural barriers exceed.Members of the family, desquiciados and out all idealità, but defending despite everything, and without knowing it, values of honesty and greatness (Homer Simpson model) as well as the surprising end anti-Hollywood, manage to make forget, somehow, not too adventurous staging and artistic conception. Therefore, I choose finally rated the movie positively.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3823

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Matrimonio Compulsivo

muchocine

It is hilarious and extremely entertaining, with some absolutely unforgettable jokes that soon be forgotten. Impossible not laugh.

The Farrelly Brothers return to the fray with a hilarious film less sweetened than we are accustomed, starring one of the current Kings of comedy, Ben Stiller, who accompanied his father and actor Jerry Stiller, and Michelle Monaghan ("mission: impossible 3").Eddie Cantrow is increasingly more overwhelmed: fails to find a woman to lay his head, and his forty years still unmarried while all his to the rededor pairs and House. Why, who believes finding the ideal girl (Malin Akerman), so no doubt even a moment and decides to take the big step a few weeks of knowing. Decision that turns out to be more reckless, because during the honeymoon discovers that the perfect woman so perhaps not so much. And certainly does not help in any way the appearance of the dazzling Miranda.Que Brothers directors have lost the pulse which at the time had no doubt no one. From "Something happens with Mary" little by little they have gone down the bar, his films becoming increasingly commercial products and therefore adapting his personal humor to a broader style, in order to reach a greater number of viewers. Thus, products such as "Love blind" or "Love in game" replaced "Two fools very stupid" or "I, I, and Irene", to the disappointment of many. However, with "The Heartbreak Kid" (original title of his latest film) seems to have been given a turning point.Is not that they have returned to their origins, since the scheme that follows "Compulsive marriage" is the same as in "Pretty Woman",".""And then she came", or many other romantic comedies, and is still abusing certain somewhat unnerving empalagosismo. And it is precisely in the scenes and moments more to use when the film loses long bellows, coming to do something heavy, taking into account the excessive length (almost two hours).But yes begin to see again gags delirious, harsh and painful, a kid and thick brush, characters of the best humor freak. all elements allowing to distinguish a film of the Farrelly from the rest. There is still a long way to rebuild, but the first stone is already set. "In addition, despite the predictability that stains in general all the footage, the film hides a couple of twists coming surprise a viewer that already accommodated in your sofa believing that he knew how things would end.""Compulsive marriage" is a film that is far from being "Something happens with Mary", and peca still of some plot schematic prevents him to mark the difference. But it is hilarious and extremely entertaining, with some absolutely unforgettable jokes that will it take to be forgotten (the scene with the medusa, solar protection, of the Mexican "folklore"). Ben Stiller is in top form and with its schizophrenic performance shows that it remains a reference in the world of humor, and both Michelle Monaghan as the other side (in particular Jerry Stiller and the Miranda family) are charming.Impossible not laugh.P.s. recommended stay to see the final titles.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3484

Bloody Will

Beowulf

muchocine

In the almost two-hour film I have not had the feeling of boredom or boredom, but a sense of that was constantly expecting something finally Zemeckis no me ha dado

I still remember when there by 1992, just when he had just released ' Terminator 2 and the T-1000 had become a milestone, Cameron announced a film shot entirely with computer-generated actors. In 1992 this was madness, there was no CGI, digital effects came out as much for 10 minutes in total of a film and above to recreate human factions was sloppy. How much has changed the film, and who would say that 15 years later would be something like 'Beowulf'.After enjoying as a dwarf with the new by Zemeckis, I have good news and another bad: good, 'Beowulf' is impeccable visually, with a decent script and some as brutal scenes (beware of lead to children) as specific, which makes viewing more than entertained. The bad news is that the expectations that we have created, end up being correct isn't enough, with some disappoint. To put that in the almost two-hour film I have not had the feeling of boredom or boredom, but a sense of that was constantly expecting something finally Zemeckis no me ha dado. It could start a controversy about CGI Yes or CGI, but it is clear that after seeing 'Beowulf' there is nothing to prevent that this film was made with real characters very much in the style of 'The Lord of the Rings'. Moreover, the scenes which combines the appearance of deformed, mythological and fantastic beings faced with the hero of the story are not so many as to justify an entirely digital film.However, and sticking to road, the perfection in texture, skin and movements of the characters Ray real image, with that I say everything. Let's say that Zemeckis him trouble as go with players waiting in the caravan.The story is simple: Beowulf (Winstone), a specialist in liquidate monsters, lands in the land of King Hrothgar (Hopkins) to kill Grendel (Crispin Glover), whose main occupation is to kill the entire population on party nights. After executing his work, the mother of the Monster (Jolie) searches for revenge. I would not like to dwell much more that he was unaware of the second part of the story of the protagonist of the legend, and that he has ignored part of the cast trailer, will leave it continues.With a very basic premise, Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary has taken almost 10 years in shaping a script that obviously gave to mount an epic film in its entirety. Finally what remains is an amalgam between much macho cry (' I am Beowulf!)(' is repeated 15 times without), much empty talk and any inconsistency, where priority is given to relations between the characters and less epic struggles but milk, I have not gone to see a Jim Jarmusch film, so the mere fact that the plot runs of fluid forms and serve as a preliminary to the scenes strong me is more than enough not to fall into deep sleep. Perhaps we expected a round product, and with someone like Roger Avary was aboard sensed more consistency, so satisfied with something simpler and without desire for significant complications.The strong point of 'Beowulf' is therefore its image. Impressive the invoice technical Zemeckis has permeated in each frame of the film, where has been treated in a thorough manner every last detail. His greatest achievement is to make you forget that everything shown on screen is created by computer and some scenes are basically perfect, though, and there's always a downside that the capture of the characters in the image and likeness of those providing his voice (Robin Wright, Angelina Jolie, John Malkovich, or Anthony Hopkins) takes you sometimes to distract you looking for their defects.Priceless two of the best scenes seen so far: the fight between Grendel and Beowulf, and the final 10 minutes, they get to lift the film at a time where the dialogues between the protagonists begin to wane. The trouble is that the appearance of the mother of Grendel, requeterepetida in the trailers released by the Studio, loses the impact that was supposedly intended to Zemeckis, therefore is in the retina a magnificent Jolie, covered in gold, and a little horny. Thus, expected an endless succession of fights, jumps, and epic battles remain something disappointed after checking that they are 4 times that we are going to see Beowulf handling the sword. There are few, I know.Two things that we get lost along the way: Crispin Glover, the voice of Grendel, whose dubbing into Spanish has deleted the excellence of his performance, and the lack of rooms IMAX which release it on a massive scale. This is a spectacle of colors and movements, and the lack of preparation of our films in 3-D rooms will do much harm.If we stick to the lack of enthusiasm that has been received the film in the USA, I reiterate what was said in: overdose of expectations that has inoculated us the distributor with a few impressive trailers is dissatisfied when it comes to check virtually all spectacular Beowulf is condensed into 30 or 40 minutes, which is a put ** if we proceed to compare with the great Leonidaswhich lacked the encouragement to continue handing out left and right.That a film does not have a dash of 10 does not mean that you can not enjoy the wrapping around him. I have enjoyed my Beowulf, the monster Grendel and a finish that leaves you at the edge of the seat, and this whilst I am aware that there will be a unanimous opinion about how good or crappy. For lovers of the fantasy epic without the pretensions of a Tolkien

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3541

Silvia Giner

Canciones de amor en Lolitas Club

muchocine

Lolitas Club last flatulence Aranda, doubly bad, double sleeping and doubly misinterpreted by Edu Noriega, but not only him, all actors are fatal, and when this happens already I've said a thousand times is the fault of the director.

Doubly bad, double sleeping and doubly wrong performed by Edu Noriega, but not only him, all actors are fatal, and when this happens already I've said a thousand times is the fault of the director; Vicente Aranda throw a fart and as a result is born love songs at LOLITA´S CLUB, a story composed of fragments that not lead us anywhere, where the art direction leaves a lot to be desired and in whose viewing will feel the imperative of get off the seat and go to vomit.This film follows the same line as the previous Sr.Aranda, loose the plot and poorly interpreted. I expected much of this movie, have suffered a spiritual aneurysm before such vision. And that I am super fan of the two protagonists why even more gets me the pathetic outcome of the movie.By the way at the premiere of the movie the director Mr not agreed one of the names of their actresses alluding a: "as I head" when going to present them.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4175

Moebius

El mago (The Wiz)

muchocine

If you want a lysergic trip without drugs won't see the wizard, it will not disappointed.

In that would think Sidney Lumet to get into a similar scrubbing? It seems that the man really worked with estusiasmo on the project, but I cannot think of worse way of closing a decade as bright as that signed there in the 1970s. The wizard is certainly not an evening dogs. The lethal power of this tape served to wipe all the blaxploitation phenomenon. It would be funded by the CIA?There was someone who had the happy idea of mounting a musical on Broadway based on the classic story of the wizard of Oz, but adapting it to the reality of African American and only with singers and dancers of color. The capo of the Motown, Berry Gordy, wanted to bring the musical to the big screen by Motown Productions, the film and television subsidiary of the famous black record company. Initially Gordy wanted the same protagonist of music to interpret the virginal Dorothy. But the manipulative Diane Ross got of medium and persuaded the producer Rob Cohen to offer a production deal with her as a top star. A thirty-something years making Dorothy Ross? It's the magic of the soul! The initial director felt that what had no logic and left the ship. Sidney Lumet, I do not know if I needed to pay off the mortgage or was clueless, was in charge of the direction.Apart from Miss Ross and some survivors of the cast of the musical was moved another great Star (already detached Motown) that perform the scarecrow. And what a star! Michael Jackson, when still not had become Wacko Jacko, co-protagonizaría the film along with the Ross. Mage was to Comedian Richard Pryor, and by long omnipresent Quincey Jones was in charge of the musical arrangements with a Pleiad of musicians and composers.I suppose that you to really enjoy with the magician is a black brother proud of their race that odie to Judy Garland, either or is a staunch fan of the funk, soul and music disc. Within the nonsense I cannot deny that I enjoyed the experience. There are some good songs, highlighting especially those in which Jackson takes protagonism, although others, especially ballads, they are quite boring. Then there is the collection of incredible masks Wacko Jacko and its antólogicas quotes from famous literally out of the filling of the body (?). To the decorated kitsch and black characters past acid added a few dialogs that appear to perjeñados by a schizophrenic (Joel Schumacher screenplay) and scenes unpayable as the persecution in the subway station, where bins and columns come to life and attack the characters! Not to mention some enigmatic taxis never take passengers and a long scene in the twin towers (Yes, the world of Oz merges with the of New York. worthy of a genius!) with colors and dances that stretches to infinity (and that which was shortened due to technical problems!) that leaves the best fill of Christmas Turkey at the height of a hamburger Mac.Las scenes intertwine as the sausages can entangle, and must be the music with less dialogue I've seen in my life. As the fish who drink, here they sing, sing and sing and return to singing. And when it already seems that Dorothy is going to return home, he gets to sing again! Spectacular, friends.I guess that it should be humor to enjoy with so strange film, but as I have already said I admit that I have spent good times. He would repeat the experience? I doubt it, but if you want a lysergic trip without drugs won't see the wizard, it will not disappointed.And that someone explain to me if you have any meaning that in a film where the protagonist all are black back home thanks to a white magician.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2446

Berto

Transformers

muchocine

If you want to spend 2 and a half hour spectacular, with action, laughs, action, persecutions, action and special effects that you tardareis days in delete you from the head, this is your film, for everything else, you have other twenty films in billboard fixed colmaran much more your expectations.

Slowly fall premieres of the summer, and the waiting to arrive the fifth installment of the most famous Wizard of all time, here comes this weekend one of the premieres that more box office will raise around the world and that fixed that broken some record fund-raising, and that men spider and the pirates came strong this yearbut there is something which separates this film from the rest of premieres and is that this film has achieved something that however neither Spider-Man 3 and Pirates of the Caribbean 3 managed, is entertain me during all the footage from the film and I forget the clock during the 2 hours and a half which takes the film. It was clear that the tandem Michael Bay and Steven Spielberg would produce an authentic revientataquillas, but also the already mentioned previously that mission and did and however Spider-Man 3 is definitely the weaker of all, with authentic moments painful and quite desaprovechada, as well as pirates of the Caribbean 3 is the weaker due to its lack of new ideas and his intention to try to finish all the plotlines of two movies in too little time.In the film I took today, we find ourselves with adaptation to the big screen in a series of cartoons in which robots, grouped into two sides, good and bad, are fighting on the planet Earth, for an end to the human race and others for trying to save her, and is in this simple argument which was based the ochentera series and is on this premise that underpin Transformers in 2007. As you can see, the script is more simple, and let us not deceive ourselves, the film is simple in terms of script, is simple in terms of characters, and is even predictable throughout the film, but, since when a film and not can be enjoyed? We will enjoy at another time of Fincher or Scorsese, go to the movies for fun at the end and at Cape is one of their main reasons for existence, entertain, and this film is that it entertains. There a moment to relax, because from the third minute of footage the robots make their appearance, and fine appearance, and throughout the movie the pace and action grows until an end to slash the Pinnacle and you dry without blinking because if you blink you lose some extraordinary special effects second that wasted the film at all times and especially in the final half-hourone of the most impressive battles that we have seen in the film throughout its history, and that they are already more than 100 years. Believe me if I tell you that we will not see special effects and all that remains of the year, and probably take some more, to find a film that her equal or exceed in terms of perfection, eye candy and spectacular, and not worth me having the second part of Transformers, because Yes, friends, we have singing trilogy.Obviously, the characters in this film are nothing out of this world, and in this we have stereotypes of the typical normalito guy from Institute, its respective companion, very good to say enough is enough, the Group of American soldiers who fight and fight until the fainting by his country, the Minister of defence that does not hesitate to do anything to save the people and even the typical group of hackers slip of glancingvery good girl incorporated, with the head of a section of a top secret organization too paranoid to know for sure how he came up there. Among them highlights undoubtedly Shia LaBeouf, authenticates the film revelation and authentic revelation Usa, with a couple of released movies is becoming a mass phenomenon and after seeing the movie I understand perfectly, because LaBeouf, has charisma, and with its performance you get well into the first moments that comes on the screensomething essential to continue with a bit more interest the plot, and already posts, say that his choice of son of Indiana Jones seems perfect to me, you can give much freshness and be at the height of so highly anticipated role. Megan Fox is very normalita, is dedicated to show off Palmetto throughout the film, which is not little, and the fact that his character is very little used, almost as untapped group of marines, among which are Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson, which can very little mention of them except that his performance is correct and little more. As for Jon Voight and John Turturro, they are not bad, but while Voight makes a more content role, Turturro gets carried away by his character almost to the grotesque and created one of the strangest roles throughout the film, that Yes, with their good moments and do not detract from his performance in any situation, we note that you rolling switched it pipe.Ultimately, Transformers is a real summer blockbuster, but the of a few years ago, those who were going to see looking for a good time of fun and widely improved your expectations. If you want to spend 2 and a half hour spectacular, with action, laughs, action, persecutions, action and special effects that you tardareis days in delete you from the head, this is your film, for everything else, you have other twenty films in billboard fixed colmaran much more your expectations.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4132

Tito Chinchan

Las dos y media y ... veneno

muchocine

Film about swindlers who want to avail of a few newbies undertakers to perpetrate a scam. Opera prima of Mariano Ozores, which surprises us with a very nice mess comedy and really hilarious moments. Highly recommended

Director: Mariano Ozores. duration: 77 minutes.Release date: December 10, 1959.Espectadores: 10.484 human beings.Conversation in the mansion underground of the family of Chinchan of the high peaks and the flowered valleys: I: could see the directorial debut of Mariano Ozores.Ella: of tits the time with your son.Me: That no, that is not tits.She: do the book says of cinema?Me: That is a comedy light, insubstantial, but with a bit of freshness.She: It puts it to give birth, I do not see it.Me: Maybe he had read regarding Ozores is "by-product of inexplicable commercial success" she: accept ship as they are small.Roque (three), had been in no less than 40 minutes but with a smile on the face. Glory to the Almighty, have seen a movie together Ozores. Aleluya.la film is about a guy (Jose Luis Ozores) who works at a gas station and his girlfriend wants to stay with the business of the father (a funeral home of new creation). With the help of a veterinarian (Antonio Ozores), they attend their first assignment, the death of a rich man of the people, very dear. When they arrive at the House, things do not seem to agree at all.If not tell me that it is the first movie as a director Mariano Ozores you would think that it is a great movie, but this finding explains to me why this man came to be what it was. And no I said I, if not my girl (the same that is capable of skinning a film without disheveled). It is a comedy film you mess with a great Jose Luis Ozores (if you had been born in that country which repeated its acronym, we would see him as a genius among the classics) very well supported by his brother and a great King Ferdinand. Situations are of American comedy, even the atmosphere, making many times to think it not be watching a Spanish movie. I laughed a lot, despite being a mood of 50 years ago, there is nothing.In short, film about swindlers who want to avail of a few newbies undertakers to perpetrate a scam. Opera prima of Mariano Ozores, which surprises us with a very nice mess comedy and really hilarious moments. Highly recommended to do with love.Essential viewing for anyone who likes the Spanish classic film.Besitos.P.D: Data from the Ministry and the pussy of the Bernarda appear on wikipedia as synonyms.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3677

Oscar Martínez

The Fall

muchocine

A true visual wonder full of symbolism.

The fall is the second film directed by Tarsem Singh, known for his excellent career in the world of the music video and his first film, the cell, starring Jennifer Lopez. On this occasion, the Indian director has visited over twenty countries to shoot The fall, film which, according to his own words, was inspired by a Bulgarian film Yo Ho Ho.Tras have been acclaimed in this edition of the festival of Toronto, The fall has been described as the best fairy tale without fairy from the Princess Bride. The film begins with the young Alexandria, a young man with an arm broken at a hospital in Los Angeles in 1920. There you will know Roy, a double for the dangerous scenes, it's commit suicide with morphine. In order to forget their hardships, Roy decides to tell to Alexandria 'the most wonderful story of the world', a tale of dream in which five heroes will travel through space and time to put an end to the evil emperor Odius, who has frustrated their lives.Of all the films that by the time a server has had the opportunity to see in this edition of the Sitges Festival, undoubtedly The fall momentarily, is the big winner. And with difference. Halfway between the Princess Bride and the adventures of Baron Munchausen, The fall is a visual poem, an ode to the fantasy and imagination that captivates the viewer in a way irrremediable.Covert after an alleged account for children, the second feature film by Tarsem Singh maintains this same aesthetic of music video for the cell, in which each sequence is a spectacle of contrasts for the hearing and that the colors seem to exit the screen, thanks largely to the costume design of Eiko Ishioka, acclaimed for his wonderful work both the cell and Coppola's Dracula, by which took the Oscar in 1993.Dejando aside the visual delight which is The fall that, on the other hand, manages to turn every one of their frames in a box of unparalleled beauty, applies that the film could be defined as a beautiful hymn to life and hope, full of symbolism, humor, and so hard as poignant moments starring Lee Pacewho plays the role of the convalescent stuntman Roy Walker in real life, and the masked Bandit in the story, but that he would certainly not have sense without the sweet characterization young Catinca Untaru makes more skeptical Alexandria.Los perhaps to say that The fall touches sometimes ridiculous, that his characters may be joke and that its plot is full of inconsistencies and unexplained temporary jumps, but Tarsem Singh movie manages to bring us both into its history, manages to achieve such affinity between his characters and the Viewer, that any inconsistency or defect is insignificant while history take its course.A true visual wonder full of symbolism, and one of the best placed candidates to win the triumph in Sitges 2007.Le give a 8'5 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2496

Rafa Ferrer

Harry Potter y el prisionero de Azkaban

muchocine

Does Alfonso Cuarón (specializing in slightly more adult film) has given another? touch? to the film.

Well I've seen one of the films of the summer and after taking in the door one of anecdotes more strange, quirky and funny way to tell my opinion, but first I'll tell it, is I when I was a kid was always to the cinema with my father or my sisters (I'm the youngest of 4 sisters) and I always carried film accompanied only? ever. do well when I went to see "Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban" when I was at the door with my media naranja, making time to enter, more than anything by that I can't stand being late to not miss the trailers, I see a mother talking to the usher? And when you say that begins the film? And when tells me that you just? In this turns and tells the child that is not separate from the usher and make him in any case. do and already she withdraws from the tail to the cry-that release to leave the kid watching the this nonsense of Harry Potter! (it should be noted that the child was walking between 8 or 9 years)After entering the room and project us some trailers, including "Mar adentro" of Amenabar, based on the life of Ramon San Pedro, (the paraplegic Galician who finally managed to put an end to his life) and starring Javier Bardem and Belén Rueda, "The polar Express" that if the film is going to be like the trailer want to see it already! (premiered in Christmas) by that I swear I am excited and even a few tiny lagrimitas have suddenly leaned accidentally by my eyes; "Spiderman II" that is true that impresses almost as much or more than the first part, but it is also true that he looks a "whiff" of Superman films, as told me this afternoon my kinsman when spoke with him of the item. And "Catwoman" of Pitof, I've seen the Teaser and finally. for porn movie if, but for superhero movie. Uff, I do not know to say.After the trailers shuts down everything and starts to sound the tune I know of memory (more than anything by that took melody on my mobile phone) and appears the logo of Warner which we are facing and we planted 10 of Privet drive and begin to see what we have been reading in the book (it is true and I understand) that summarize a book is trickythat condense 359 pages in a film of two hours and 10 min. It is something crappy, more than anything that I know writers and know how difficult it is, here there is with the reader's imagination, everything here must translate it so that reflect it the sense of sight. Also the change of director, Chris Columbus (specialized in child and youth film) to Alfonso Cuarón (specializing in slightly more adult film) has been another "touch" the film.One of the things that more strange found me has been change of locations for Hogwarts, in the first two films were shot in a city and it was decided to change more than anything there it rained one exaggerated thing and decided to search for another site, so now some things have changed, the corridors of the school are distintintos to as them and the position of the hut of Hagrid alsoin fact before I was below the castle in an Esplanade behind forest prohibited and now, however, must be down a ramp to give with it and even Boxer Willow now isn't where it was in the second movie. You quickly enter the game but after two films it is shocking to see such a change of scenery.I have to say that the special effects are spectacular, highlighting the presence of Buckbeak the hippogriff (ILM has surpassed itself) and in this case is the visual spectacle of the film including that "moment Titanic" has Harry on the back of the same. I would also highlight the Dementors that when I saw for the first time I was reminded to the spectra of the ring of "The Lord of the rings" Although in special effects the saga of Harry Potter has never faltered and since the first film until this most of them (the Elf Dobby in the above) have been excellent.Alfonso Cuarón, as I've already said is an accomplished director of young actors and in this (well known is complicated a film with kids) all work excellently well, additionally Ron Weasley is no longer the comic comparsa (dubbing is also excellent at last!) and Hermione Granger is also taking almost both prominence and Harry Potter. By the way, there are two details more than I want to highlight that there is a change in uniforms that make them less colegiales and Quidditch clothes finally seems sportswear (with name and everything behind) in this film although there are party in all is a pity that it lasts so little. Also I liked to see the players more time dressed in street clothes.By the way, the score conducted by John Williams is excellent and sometimes puts you goose bumps because that the Union between images and music is nothing short of magic! In a film of this type.Now only remains for me to read the book again (my favorite of the Potter) since that long ago that I did and I have quite forgotten memories of it already and I think I will try to see the movie a couple of times more since that has seemed excellent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/809

Elena Suárez

Beyond the sea

muchocine

For almost two hours, we will return to live the magic of the orchestras of the 1950s, American social change in the 1960s but, above all, the desire to live a child who believed could not exceed fifteen years of age.

It is possible that many of those present not us it sounds for anything the name of Bobby Darin. Also, it is very possible that it cost us to put songs like "Beyond the sea" or "Mack the Knife". Do but, we perhaps something more familiar the following stanza: by the corner of the old quarter saw him pass, with the? tumbao? do they have the handsome walking, hands always in the pocket of his overcoat? pa? they do not know in which one takes the dagger.Do do do do use a medium wide-brimmed hat? Lao people? and slippers if there is a problem out? volao?.As well, this letter belongs to one of the multiple versions that exist in Spanish one of the greatest successes of the popular singer Bobby Darin, teen idol during the 1950s and 1960s and whose lyrics can still hear in the category of Robbie Williams.La interpreters mouth biography that has played and directed Kevin Spacey (and which in United States premiered in 2004) not only about millimeter form to the life real multi-faceted artist (also an actor) but that, in addition, conveys extraordinarily of the same quality; and that has its merit, especially when the soundtrack is performed by the same Spacey (and I assure you that it has no waste, in fact, the role earned him a Golden Globe nomination for best actor in a musical or comedy).The film is exquisite not only sound but also sets and costumes, masterfully recreating the atmosphere of local legendary as the Copacabana in New York. For almost two hours, we will return to live the magic of the orchestras of the 1950s, American social change in the 1960s but, above all, the desire to live a child who believed could not exceed fifteen years of age.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2636

Bruji

The holiday

muchocine

Nancy Meyers does not comply with the basic purpose of the romantic comedies, but knows defeat the shallowness inherent in stories of this genre.

Nancy Meyers does not comply with the basic purpose of the romantic comedies, which is love, but manages to excite telling two stories that are full of references moviegoers. With them, moreover, known defeat the shallowness inherent in this genre stories, break with numerous established topics and create a movie with heart, especially recommended for those who are in the process of "desenamoramiento". Does that?.The confidences are made at midnight, but anytime is right to confess an addiction, mine, to the romantic comedies. Based on it, say that eighty percent of the stories that make up so sweet universe in recent decades, are cut by a common pattern: "they are lying and they forgive". By forever never happened in Manhattan, I have never Besado. A dangerous formula that makes the genre stalwarts leave the cinema with a terrible remorse of guilt of others and, what is worse, with a strange feeling of false love. Obviously, we have allowed ourselves seduce by non-existent beings, with qualities such as understanding, tolerance and common sense, that are incompatible with the masculine gender.Things change when the script writes it to a woman. Old topics are reviewed and are rejected and, in their absence, the four species that compose the peculiar fauna that lose us sleep, are portrayed accurately. and with objectivity. In this way, appears insecure narcissistic, that needs to fall in love with other women to keep their own self-esteem; Peter Pan, unable to engage in his bloody life, eternal interpreter of the U2 song: "neither with you nor without you"; Mr napkin, which displays all its tenderness and its seductiveness to convince you that you're the perfect woman. to be the mother of his children; and the addict to the work, which necessarily has to be your favourite hobby.It is possible that someone thinks that the only thing that has made is to create new topics. Personally, I think that it is futile to look for in other directions: this is what there is.In any case, Nancy Meyers knows very well what he is doing. It was a major challenge to create two independent stories in the same film, and it has stood the test, relying on three fundamental aspects: different narrative structures, continuous cinematic allusions in both stories, and a full success in the choice of actors actresses.Behind of a comedy, seemingly inconsequential, holiday hides a tribute to the classics of the 1930s and 1940s. Shown in their long sequences, in the theatrical sunsets in Cameron Diaz scene, in the purest style of Carole Lombard; in the recurring "sexes struggle" with its corresponding discussion with slap, as well exploded William Wellman; and the delicacy and elegance inherited master Lubitsch, connoisseur of feminine nature. Remember, for example, the disease of Psychosomatics of one of the protagonists, and the hiccups of Merle Oberon, what you think women, 1941. but the Director goes even further, and creates two different narrative structures, because, in reality, what you are doing is telling two stories which are not interrelated. To do so, to treat the English adventure, used to the pace of British comedies, quiet and cozy, present in four weddings and a Funeral and Love Actually. A rhythm that disappears in the images of Los Angeles, where the American characters involved.They are continuous references made to the cinematic firmament of explicitly, including a cameo by the graduate, a list of classics with female protagonists of weapons to take, and a joke about the color red that uses Scorsese. In addition, Nancy will recreate various scenes that have been extracted from films such as The Mexican (discussion between Ethan and Amanda, she on top of a balcony), Titanic (the reaction that causes the name of the protagonist in his male partner) or brief encounter (the form know Jack Black and Kate, with a "char" in the eye). A few aspects that desatarán the nostalgia of lovers.Kate Winslet and Cameron Diaz have a single point in common: both have been kissed by Leo DiCaprio... and they have been able to tell. The Director knows to take advantage of the comic the first registration and the dramatic vein of Kate, which comes from the English Theatre; but he was aware that it would be a mistake to do both share scenes. The superiority of the British is more than evident. Thus, each in place and without being mixed, manage to excite and making people laugh, separately. We miss, however, some genius in the Assembly. It would have been convenient to altering its linearity absolute, only interrupted by the sequence of the spaghetti (linking the two accounts), and the plane of the splash in the bath, which gives way to a puddle.In short, a round romantic comedy, encouraged to prepare a different holiday. How sound that "you to Albacete and I to Acapulco"?. Not even there to worry about which sleeping in your room, remember that Iris leaves the dog in London.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2491

Enrique Colmena

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

Isn't enough, obviously with a brilliant ending: the set confirms that the series is not at his best film.

Was to be expected: David Yates, the director of the fifth chapter of the Harry Potter series (and what is worse, the next delivery, as it was announced), was not the most appropriate for the strongest youth of early 21st century saga. Yates has a mediocre full curriculum of works for television, none of them evolved, so it becomes strange to know what saw in the Warner to hire him (and rebound, as in gymnastics.). Effectively, the first part is desvaída, no personality, relying the filmmaker in the knowledge that the Viewer already has the characters rather than a true progression of the plot. It is true that "Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix", in his literary version, is the weaker (along with the second installment, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of secrets") of the series imagined by J.K. Rowling, but is also that of bad novels have become magnificent films: the case of "The lady from Shanghai" is recurring. Yates is limited during the first one hundred minutes, put in images the new adventures of the little (well, no longer both.) Wizard: membership in the order of the Phoenix, after being attacked in the quiet streets of London by the Dementors; the ministerial refusal to believe in the return of Voldemort, according to Harry; taxation in the Hogwarts School of a great Inquisitor Dolores Umbridge, which will end up replacing the very Dumbledore, the father figure of the saga; the creation of Dumbledore's army, with adolescents Potter as a teacher; the first kiss with Cho, then the girlfriend of the boy Cedric, who died in the previous chapter, so close to Harry. All this happened in a tired way, without rhythm, without that tone between joyful and uneasy that characterized the first two chapters, and even the third. Thankfully, from the moment that the Weasley twins decide to make pointed sleeves (what is the point reached, in this case, such phrase.), Yates seems to cheer up and the last stretch of the film cobra force and vigour, as if he had been waiting to get their best clothes: then develop bright scenes such as the defection of twins in full tests of the SCAMS (which should be as the selectivity here)(, but with more potions.) and, above all, the key sequence that takes place in the secret room of the Ministry of magic, with a stage visually very bright, with towering shelves that make up a variegated store of prophecies enclosed in balls strange lit, and that will lead in the well-structured and easily seguible (both virtues so rare now in the action scenes) sequence of the fight between Voldemort and his death eaterson the one side, and Dumbledore and his army of apprentice Wizard, on the other. But not enough, obviously with a brilliant ending: the set confirms that the series is not at his best film. Daniel Radcliffe ratifies its limitations as an actor, much which obtained critical acclaim in his theatrical debut "Equus" of Peter Shaffer; Emma Watson, the face of a Hermione Granger already with girl curves, looms as that is probably the most talented new stars discovered by the saga; You can not say that about Rupert Grint pecoso and red-haired Ron, which seems to go to get very far in his facet as actor. Among the largest are happy always find a surprise, as in this case the splendid Dolores Umbridge that composed the veteran Imelda Staunton, a certainly odious character that makes it unforgettable. The rest follows the usual tall, with powerful people of the English scene like Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith or Helena Bonham Carter; that Yes, Emma Thompson appears out of a theatrical Institute course end representation. Was not there another piece of paper for this, otherwise excellent actress?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1044

Ramón Balcells

Desayuno en Plutón

muchocine

The protagonist: a Cillian Murphy is Oscar. Who more than he could interpret this type of paper? No one.

There are films that for the reason that is, can treat many topics at the same time and not be liosas. Neil Jordan is capable of achieving this. His latest work, breakfast on Pluto, may begin with the story of a boy who has homosexual tendencies and after half an hour, can the issue of some IRA members seeking to put bombs in the city (although both stories are related, no doubt). Perhaps the way to explain to me seems a bit simple, but is what attracts me most of this film is its ability to develop so easily. Breakfast on Pluto is told as if it were a personal diary, with chapters numbered and quite short. But above all, it also seeks to be a film, and now as the beginning and the end, are not in a simple diary, but they are typical of a screenplay. It is not intended to be classical, rather it is intended to be more original. The film has a great starting point, and as I said above, knows develop excellently. Lacks it nothing, is totally round. It has moments of great dramatic intensity, which is why I can say that you it's a very depressing film. And is the story of a boy shemale without barely a hard in search of his biological parents and ANGER through the midst is not too pleasant. The protagonist: a Cillian Murphy is Oscar. Who more than he could interpret this type of paper? No one. Great cast, completely Irish, I would stress, apart from the already mentioned Murphy, Stephen Rea, playing a wizard that helps, like many other characters, the protagonist; Liam Neeson, who does not appear too, but when that comes out, he eats all those who are in front of him; Brendan Gleeson, who also appears little, but acts of wonder; and many others side that I do not know the name now, but certainly deserve to be mentioned. Me not stretch much more because I don't have time, so I will only comment on that you found me a wonderful film, where the technical aspects include photography, music (composed several songs of the 1960s) and the calculated mounting. Well, all in breakfast on Pluto worth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/70

Daniel Galindo

Casanova

muchocine

Light film, without more pretensions than the entertain

The seductive legendary stars in this comedy of manners set in Venice in the 18th century, true to his reputation for compulsive flirt.Don't expect much of this premiere makes matters more shady and loving a real character around which was installed a curious mythology due to its reputation of inconstant and cynical vividor, too realistic for the time that he lived at the palestra.Giacomo Casanova began at an early age his flirtatious and adventures with various women, becoming popular over time as the prototype of lover and adventurer. The man gives way to the myth and that is where his relationship with Francesca Bruni, a liberal woman who publishes pamphlets on women's Liberation. But far from being a critique to religion or machismo, this light film, without more pretensions than the entertain and help us to spend the afternoon of Saturday, raises the entanglements that sustain the plot without making us think of them too.Francesca, the only woman who managed to resist his charms and shunning it articulates the entire plot of this go and come from costumes, duels, deception and racing with the serene background, if you press me, the best of this film in the line of "Shakespeare in love", although closer to the story somewhat anodina something to talk about. This title is precisely the same Director, which in turn has certain pearls in a filmography that is moving parallel to the the last film Hollywood, although something more elaborate: "The cider House rules" and "Chocolat" tape are the strangest of all the filmed by Lasse Hallström Swedish, but we must stick to Casanovadevoid of dramatic excitement and historical value.Arrivals up to this point we recommend adaptation of the book of autobiographical memories took place in 1976 Federico Fellini, with Donald Sutherland in the role of the seductive that felt the need to pursue at least one conquers women's day. Has this Casanova, that Yes, some points in its favor: a cast consisting of those always correct Lena Olin, Oliver Platt and Jeremy Irons, who surround to Heath Ledger in a performance flat but able to conquer to the female audience (after deal with Brokeback mountain), certain real images of the unusual Venice and a distant reflection from moral fringes, the logical vindication of women's intellectual equal. To highlight something.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4149

Patri

Ladrones

muchocine

The idea of a few young boys who fall in love and those who like to steal together is not new, but it can take much advantage, although in the case of this film has not been.

Juan José Ballesta plays a kid who just came out of a reception centre and you have to search for life, but all that know-how is stealing, his mother taught him to do so before they stopped her when he was a child. His life changes when she meets Sara (Maria Valverde) a girl from a wealthy family that engaged in a relationship.The idea of a few young boys who fall in love and those who like to steal together is not new, but it can take much advantage, although in the case of this film has not been. In part by the flat performance of the protagonist, Juan José Ballesta, although her praises much for his interpretations I can't see in it anything that I like, when you have the weight of the film this is boring, Maria Valverde is the only thing that animates a little action, why the best moments of the film arise when she appears and stolen togetherIt is the only thing exciting, that the plot of the mother of the protagonist is not very successful.Everything is very slow in this film, since the beginning, slow motion, an unnecessary effect, because that same scene could have resolved in less time and more easily and would have been even more intense. The rest of the film is not in slow motion, but it is almost as if out, if you miss a NAP when you wake up not you've lost it nothing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3409

Tito Chinchan

Resident Evil Extincion

muchocine

Third installment where everything is gone to shit and the few remaining instead of suicide, wander aimlessly fixed. As you know that you can find, therefore not was disappointed, but hate to sacrifice innecesareamente the script.

Do you have an invasion of human flesh eaters zombies in the door of his house? Nothing, nothing, do not be alarmed, you close the little door of the gate and already they do not fall. Who do not I believe? Then watch this film of Milla Jovovich and will see as despite being dead, they are extremely educaditos. Incidentally, the mile has less hairs on salva is the party that the barby in her pussy himself. Or at least their clones.The film is a future in which a lethal virus has wiped out life on the planet. The Poles have become cubes, deserted forests, and human beings are zombies that have only desire in life as nibble the faucets to the few humans remaining. On the one hand, the hordes of zombies do not know very well what they want (very funny en who have stayed in their jobs and homes). On the other hand, the Corporation that has mounted this, trying to fix it in their own way. And the good we have a caravan of survivors and the Milla Jovovich has more danger that a sack escorpiones.¿Que what seems to me the movie? So that from the moment the zombies do not cross the gates I realized that this is nothing more than an homage to films as zombies Party or even the great Hitchcock birds. By that does not tell me anyone that the zombies do not give laughter (it coming out at the end somewhat less). The argument is what you can expect from a film, but am very sorry for not to strive a little the writers. Do not they electrificaron the fence of Jurassic Park that did not escape the bugs? Because so, at least. Is that have special effects, and a visual display that is the cane, but the viewer that carried the film, the brain or is leave it close (in the car for example) because he realizes that he does not hold.In short, third installment of the saga Resident Evil, where everything is gone to hell and the few remaining instead of suicide, wander aimlessly fixed. As you know that you can find, therefore not was disappointed, but hate to sacrifice innecesareamente the script.The Milla Jovovich this has a remeneo, I think if you clones it, with one you stay for the nights of cold and zombies beyond the gate, right?Besitos.P.D: those who were thinking that there would not be a quarter, I can assure you that there will be. These are crosses.Pd2: Evil has a moment towards the end very large, but much much.P.D.3: Hosts, which I forgot. The central computer of the Beehive has human form to interact with men. Because it is pinned to a neighbor of mine who plays the piano. That am.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4364

Jaime Martínez

Un funeral de muerte

muchocine

Descacharrante tape full of brightness and nothing pretentious. Intelligent and absurd in equal parts, a tape that despite the few characters and places, keep you a smile in the face during his viewing.

From the ingenious initial titles that give way to the film, until the last frame, await us 85 minutes (is grateful for the short duration) a kid humor in charge of director Frank Oz, responsible for not too many good things but include In & out and the remake of perfect women thanks to the presence of Nicole Kidman. Intelligent humor and typically English is what follows the tape of Frank Oz. Death at a funeral is a hilarious proposal where his comic base goes increscendo as it progresses the footage. The work is simple: a House, a couple of hours of temporary space, a good handful of actors and a dead. How wonderful of all this, is the extreme ability of the director to obtain resources with so few ingredients and squeeze them to the limit. With these basic premises, Frank Oz gives shape to a tronchante very English comedy where the humour is ever-present. With a virtually non-existent script, the greatness of this film lies in laughter (or laugh) caused in the public. It appears a bit hesitant and not these very safe to where this movie will take you, but within minutes you realize that front have a nice movie, mocking and Disney over not being able, with a few gags and situations of more irreverent and Surrealists. The humor of death at A funeral, as I have already said, increases as we move forward in the plot, and what appeared to be fixed in the next scene just getting worse to unsuspected heights. It is brilliant see how a seemingly easy situation can degenerate so much and even get to touching moment of total gap; excellent pace imposed by the director in carrying out the gags. If I have to throw something on face, is the presence of some escatological jokes as seen in the genre of teen comedy, and so little they give this type of intelligent comedies. I think that it is not necessary to resort to this kind of uncouth humor and helpings, that harms the covers total that remove from the film. In addition, some gags are kilometers and when they are executed lose all sense of grace that they are more predictable. Another negative point would be the creation of some characters lack. It is missing be better drawn and defined, although that is probably more irrelevant in a tape of 85 minutes where the real charm lies in its british humor. The cast of actors who appear in death at A funeral are virtually unknown in Spain. Matthew Macfadyen is the only one that stands out a bit from among others, for his appearance in the film pride & prejudice. Actor Alan Tudyk gives us a hilarious performance with his character, a lawyer drugged with acids by mistake hours before the funeral. Without doubt, the best of all the tape occurs around this character. Simply hilarious. In short, a descojonante and descacharrante film full of brightness and nothing pretentious. Intelligent and absurd in equal parts, a tape that despite the few characters and places, keep you a smile in the face during his viewing. A well done comedy that makes you laugh up her spinal cord. Highly recommended to have a good time and a good bag of popcorn.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/461

Alberto Concepción

Salvador

muchocine

A correct script and a good job of direction make, despite imperfection, 'Salvador Puig Antich' a story full of drama and film talent... good film.

It is not easy to make a film with political references: there is always the risk that much of the public (and critique) the rejected, either by having different or dislike ideology before it. And if it is also a time so close and so dark of our history, most likely the controversy. Therefore, best is abstract, work according to objective data but without forgetting the own criterion, i.e. 'make the movie that you want'. And it is this, for better or worse, what happens in 'Salvador'.Salvador Puig Antich was a young anarchist, Catalan, who lived (and 'fought') the end of the Franco dictatorship. Probably these four features on their person that mark the film: his youth, his fight against the power, the time, the Francoist repression and the fact of being Catalan.The complexity of history and of his person, is noticeable. But the script, despite their ups and downs, especially at the beginning of the film, finally get away: good reflection of the anti-catalanismo, as well as the harshness of the State security bodies. But the truth is that it is missing a greater depth in the childhood of the protagonist, in the why of his anarchism, therefore used, with greater or lesser effectiveness flashbacks (that rock music does not end curdling), are not enough.Despite knowing in advance the end of the story, the director Manuel Huerga, knows print interest, but above all, emotion. The death of Salvador is told of agonizing, cruel, real way: waiting becomes interminable, and inevitably feel some anxiety when it is about to be executed. The technical aspect, the soundtrack and the final Assembly, are, although without reaching clash, certainly improved: perhaps the director is looking for 'easy tear' in the latter part of the film and he notices too, its ideology and position before the historical period in which we find ourselves.However, is the performance of Daniel Brühl best film: while not exactly too chameleonic, German actor knows how to bring his characters, and this time would not be an exception. Tristán Ulloa and Leonardo Sbaraglia also made a good work, both well assisted by the family Puig Antich. so therefore a correct script and a good job of direction make, despite imperfection, 'Salvador Puig Antich' a story full of drama, talent and cine.buen film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3329

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La noche de los muertos vivientes

muchocine

Capital title of new modern horror cinema. From here has fallen pigswill and trumpets and clarínes that sound when over purely personal considerations, the film becomes a time notary have sounded...

I always had the idea that the night of the living dead was not only the film zombies in white and black that stubbornly a friend of mine wanted to he saw a Scotch tape (not I see them, no longer exist) retained as absolute jewel in the film. I saw her and it seemed not an absolute gem of a film. In any case, found me a great horror film advancing to comedy or a comedy film that forced coup of viscus, tear and several gruesomeness, entry into the territory of the terror. Twenty years ago this and last night I could see it in a more than acceptable DVD edition that exceeded despite the rough black and white, the jewel of my friend. No longer see you (circumstances are the predictable: the distance, which is forgotten, and the time, which is the bug bastard that prevents the affections and the routines in these affections) but I can't help but think of those my years of glowing love for cinema and the vision between the uncertainty and the fascination of the works of George a. Romero. I now appreciate what then not I knew: the value, the foundational aspect of a genre that Romero broke up then recompose while that artistic emergency was aimed at account of the usual ferocity of criticism. Night of the living dead is the death certificate from Gothic films to the use of the haunted houses and the ghosts of corrupt shrouds and souls in penalty with nauseating drapery and deranged look. From here, the genus British noble weight of the fantastique and embraced new roads, paths lighted by the lights of the cold war and the real fear that some obscurantist political and emparanoiado pressed the fateful button. Already know: the deadly toy of Oppenheimer Sting gracefully portrayed in the fantastic Russians. And the tape had to bother, I imagine: semidocumentary tone, its drab concept of what we consider a script and the twilight tone of the characters strengthens the idea of revolution, pregnant concern of surprise. Then (and from this brief can then write the indecent volume on the history of Terror from these apocalyptic zombies) came a flood of films sketches by the mother before us, but children, inevitably embadurnadas of a less relevant speech, just disturbing and, in almost all cases - except for the great and the land of the living dead - recent, flat in excitement and cynicism. Because the 1968 George a. Romero film is an encyclopedia of cynicism: an artifact of unforeseen side effects. --Critics of the time agreed on the social character of the film. So great: there are social. Viet Nam, nuclear fear, the dreadful war without war that lasted forty years and formed several generations in blindness and the forging of a deep, well-documented nationalism. But Romero did not want to reach both: there are circumstances surrounding certain artistic events - a book, an album, a film - working involuntarily as a myth. This are obvious and Romero only provided the props, the zombies, the expressionist whiff, the almost formal care neglect and, above all, the argument: that rumor just converted into tumult and which sows corpses the city, formerly stronghold of comfort and plácido stage of aburguesada life of an innocent population, deceived and indoctrinated in the belief that no other life could better be possible. The dead, those who have no break, come to burst that useless catechism. Even the origin of the dead, never counted, can induce the shaking: we do not know whether they return to torture the living through some toxic sortilegio or is a mere consequence of the inscrutable designs of the dark, from alien to the Cartesian solidity of the real and tangible, of the material and measurable. Voodoo, toxins, do experiments? Romero no matter the origin: he wants to display the desconhort, the impossibility of finding a grab - physical, spiritual - which defeat evil.All the dead that walk, these corpses eaten by disgust, roam without moral purpose: displaces them the primordial instinct of hunger, nor Romero explained. Or need to do. No other movie of zombies that has continued to this us supplied explanations. Mind the sharp picture of the demolition of a society may be spent, infected by the same virus that cracked skin, dismember the meat and raise the dead of their coffins. This is chaos and not the modern vision of the jungle 4.0. this link (now demonized Youtube grace) long the full tape. Yes, complete.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4200

Rafa Ferrer

Un mar de líos

muchocine

A funny comedy, starring Kurt Russell and Goldie Hank with very very funny moments.

In 1987 Garry Marshall, author of the mythical and famous "Pretty Woman" made this film, vehicle for showcasing of the 2 protagonists (who were already a couple), Kurt Russell and Goldie Hanw (why this woman I remember every day to her daughter Kate Hudson?) and became one of those mythical tapes with some moments that will remain in the retina of the Viewer for a long timeIt is true that we have a romantic comedy to the use, but the 3rd grade to which the character of Russell subjected the Hawn as revenge for how bad she has dealt worth from beginning to end? Well, the end I leave for females that like both these final elducorados.Incidentally, tape WINS integers in V.O. Since many of the Concierto made are worth its price in gold in original version, it is true that we need a little bit more than cinematographic culture and geek to be able to pick up, that is why in his voice have gone to easy, not giving many laps in his "alleged translation".In addition to the protagonists are a fun staff of side, many of them common in the Filmography of Marshall, Edward Herrmann, Katherine Helmond, Michael Hagerty, names a priori not sound but if its rostos all comedies that we have seen a thousand times.Finally, and not for less important, the soundtrack filled with Southern music based on bangio, the most fun one you can put as sound to a movie of this kind.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3222

Francisco Bellón

Las 13 Rosas

muchocine

Las 13 Rosas is an extraordinary film, is a fact of the Civil war without complexes, and surely will help eradicate the fear to address similar stories in the film.

There is no more than read the newspapers or turn on the radio to check that sadly, in 2007 Spain talk about the Civil War, the dictatorship and the Francoist repression, is controversial. There is who is of the opinion that it is best not to mention the subject and forget, but who leaves aside the history is doomed to make the same mistakes of the past. And cinema, with few exceptions (Ay, Carmela!, the bicycles are for the summertime), barely spoke about the Civil War, of course excluding the pamphlets made during the dictatorship.Why a movie like Las 13 Rosas, who will be heavily attacked by political issues, is very necessary, and that it has a fact specific, unjust and atrocious, but do a great normally and without any kind of revanchism. Emilio Martínez-Lázaro offers a clean an act cruel, barbaric and tremendously unjust portrait: the execution of a group of young girls by their political ideas or have helped people with the same ideology. But the Madrid filmmaker is not only limited to make a prison and judicial Chronicle, but also reflects fear of the population of Madrid before the triumphal entry of the national troops. Between all this fear, moreover, are the old grudges, opportunists and profiteers seeking only their own benefit. All this reflects a Martínez-Lázaro which, demonstrating a great tact and delicacy, does not load the inks on the repression during the first hour of the film. The tone of the film goes up to approaching the arrests of the protagonists and his subsequent incarceration, until you reach a final filled with a great emotion and intensity. The effort to recreate that time has been Titanic, from the costumes to the digital effects all the technical aspects of Las 13 Rosas pass the examination with note. The cast of the film is simply spectacular, and even partly unfair, it is impossible to not overemphasize its trio protagonist, three of the Spanish stars of greater talent of his generation: Pilar López de Ayala, Marta Etura and Verónica Sánchez. Las 13 Rosas is an extraordinary film, is a fact of the Civil war without complexes, and surely will help eradicate the fear to address similar stories in the film. It is a film that claims of course and serves as a tribute to the memory of these young women who were victims of a brutal and unjust repression. And the day that a phrase as the previous stops be controversy in this country, we may say with Justice finally society has overcome the trauma of the Civil war and the dictatorship.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2966

Rafa Delgado

Borat

muchocine

Biting, incisive and politically very incorrect, 'Borat' laughs around the world with everyone and is extremely funny.

The best comedy in 2006. 'Borat' is a loop without end of absurd and totally hilarious situations created by a Sacha Baron Cohen in State of grace in your script in the form of a mockumentary, which makes total evidence to certain sectors and others of the American culture.Biting, incisive and politically very incorrect, 'Borat' laughs around the world with everyone and is extremely funny (although it must be acknowledged that it is not suitable for all tastes). It has one of the best male performances of the year (Sacha Baron Cohen as Borat Sagdiyev, maintaining the type during the hour and a half that lasts its creation, which unfortunately did not receive a deserved nomianción Oscar) and, possibly, one of the best and most hilarious comic sequences of the Decade (three words: two naked men).Almost kill me so that I could get to laugh.HIGHLY recommended (although as I have said before, unfortunately is not made to be digested by all).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3415

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Cuando llama un extraño

muchocine

A cock in a props high-tech: I swear that had ever gathered in one same sentence terms as found.

Strictly speaking, when a stranger calls is not a bad film. It isn't to contain meritorious Visual findings that elevate it above the mediocre products invoiced under entirely commercial premises, barely interested in the genus dignify and subjected to financial torment of the box office and promoting teenage grey massless, although cram in gadgets, hastío and (perhaps) I desconsuelo intellectual, but that is already harvesting of this chronicler. Its more than simple plot premise stretches unbearably until a climax that seems agonizing, but it (looked without enthusiasm) naïve, predictable and up exemplary.In a less strict sense, when a stranger calls is a vacuum, endless film soporíferamente vacuum, and that (oh thank you) lasts less than an hour and a half, an exercise of terror very modern with psycho-killer bolted for the Candida beauty of a baby-sistter task, installed in a House of sublime luxury, a kind of Gothic mansion designed by architect high - tech. I do not know if I explain: psycho-killer, baby-sitter, high-tech. This is one of those movies in which the semantics of their contents, the linguistic signifier of the friend Saussure, dictates the props and executes the plot.The narrative corpus is minimalist: harassment and demolition of the morality of a girl well, posh of balance, dazzled by the undeniable level of sophistication of the House of their heads, which is an absolute architecture without morality prodigy, as they said OME in the eighties, jubilant, almost solves the trance to decide whether we had a fun time or have taken us from the hair. I I am by oblivion. Some coloristic framing and even some sense of that lavish household items seem to come alive and arrogate to itself the power to be scary do that we can consider Simon West, the director of this felony, as a craftsman industrial, an epileptic artist - at the exact rate of time-, nervous writing and ease appalling to hook to the adolescent experiences on the edge of the squeal pandiatonic goloso. There are commercially irreproachable Con Air and Tomb Raider for vouching for the subject.The monumental Castle of cards built for the benefit of spectators of startle helpings falls as the film progresses: last half an hour, the tape is over, even if you are sixty minutes of pure filler. The pathetic, forced reprise occasionally lengthened to the twisting, could have been censored and the entire tape, converted into one of those endearing episodes of Alfred Hitchcock presents that they occupied the adolescence of other generations more honestly treated by the heavy machinery of the entertainment industry.The fear bubble bursts without noise: the psychopath is concerned, but not overwhelming. ("Would you have gone to see the children?"). It remains the consolation of seeing a pretty face (Jill Johnson) making grimaces, mohínes and facial pretenses and graceful and sensuously moving ass between intelligent appliances. Some of intelligence, we have at least on screen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3980

Oscar Martínez

El último tren a Auschwitz

muchocine

It is complex enough that a film about the Holocaust not spank in one way or another our chord. as well, 'The last train to Auschwitz' fails.

Directed by Joseph Vilsmaier and Dana Vávorvá and starring Gedeon Brukhard, Lale Yavaş, Lena Beyerling, Juraj Kukura, Sibel Kekilli, Roman Roth, Brigitte Grothum and Hans Jürgen Ludwig Blochberger among others, the last train to Auschwitz (Der letze Zug) was triumphant in the past Film Festival, Bavaria.La film puts us in the middle of World War II, in 1943. The nazis want to clean of Jews Berlin definitely. More than 70,000 have already been deported from the city. In April 1943 the Grunewald station leaves a train with 688 Jews to Auschwitz. The trip takes six days. The train begins a fight against the heat, hunger and thirst. In desperation, some attempt to flee; among them, Henry Lea and Ruth. But time is short and Auschwitz hovering ever closer.From time immemorial (cinematically speaking) the Holocaust has been one of the cornerstones to stir consciences in the world of the celluloid, being focused from a multitude of perspectives and offering large jewels as Schindler's list or the great dictator, to cite two examples sufficiently distanced both chronological and conceptually. In fact, historical revisionism, generally speaking, has given rise to much of the blockbusters of the Majors in the golden age of Hollywood.Por against, the ab (use) a theme you may well exercise the opposite to the desired effect, and an excess of productions focusing on a same fact may well dishearten the Viewer, something that, in a completely different context, is ocuriendo in these same moments with fantastic adaptations of superheroes or video games. In fact, in recent years there have been many films about the Holocaust, from the aforementioned Schindler's list, passing by the pianist, life is beautiful, or much more humble productions as the ninth day, Amen, the sinking or the grey zone.Unfortunately, the last train to Auschwitz is not, nowhere near, at the height of none of the above, resulando a somewhat bland product not by its own staging - more than two hours inside a train-, but by the little substance of his performances. As well, and despite the extreme agony and panic suffered by Jews crowded on the last train to Auschwitz, and despite also the repetitive flashbacks intended to, on the one hand, to liven up the story and, on the other hand, further humanizing its protagonists, his story fails to apprehend us despite the predisposition of the own Viewer: nor Henry, or read, Ruth, Albert or Gabrielle have own face, none of them comes to move us despite its terible historical context.Thus, the last train to Auschwitz is composed of two hours something tedious, repetitive and lacking nerve, except for specific moments in which inevitably the viewer must feel the aflición of its protagonists; but the truth is that the film is not cruelty, tension or Poetics.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3952

Iñaki Bilbao

Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión

muchocine

Good, although little emotional adaptation of the exquisite novel by Ian McEwan.

Good film, adapted for the screen by Christopher Hampton, who did the same for the successful "Les Liaisons dangereuses". Wright moved peculiarly, personally, the exquisite work of Ian McEwan, achieving an estimable tape, quite entertaining, if somewhat uneven, as well as strange at times.It could have been one movie of love and proverbs in a cruel era: World War II, that so many millions of life cost, but his narration, the way of telling the facts, make the film look with some distance, showing quite a few elements that refer unreality, causing some confusion at times in the second half, but in the end, with the appearance of the character embodied in excellent veteran Vanessa Redgrave, acquire shape and sense. Certain flash-backs are strangers when they contemplate or scenes as the marriage of the premium of the protagonists with the former friend of his brother can be understood in this way.An honest and quite literary, narrative that however could very well not be to the liking of some viewers, who prefer a more linear and clear filmic text. But does not play nor mislead the viewer simply him sets out facts which are later understood as a whole in a logical and truthful manner.The technical part is irreproachable, with a perfect atmosphere thanks to the good work of the English cinema, with notable art direction, costumes, hairdresser, as well as good interpretacines, although, in my view, not too special or noteworthy. "I think, honestly, that have overstated the work of its three protagonists, which are fine, over all the young person (13 years old) Saoirse Ronan, but as mentioned there are not superb.""Atonement" has seemed a good movie, hard and very sad, that it should have been much better since it had all the elements to have achieved, although to the retina are moments, like many of the first third or the time in which the triggering small sister of the tragedy apologises to the couple in love.In any case, very pleasant although not convincing at all. Best of all, the soundtrack, with the use of rhythm, and original music which indicates well clearly the spirit of the film, although until the end is not clearly-