Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3766

Iñaki Bilbao

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Curious, for the reflective and not very spectacular, film, which I hope, for the sake of humanity, is not of the genus in advance.

Curious and quite competent, in my opinion, adaptation of the famous work of Richard Matheson, already on two other occasions prior to the film.Here, against what you would expect, and more with the oscuras way of making action films today, the film is quite thoughtful, quiet and has moments righteous action, very spectacular and something terrifying, always distressing, but displayed progressively, account drops, when should it be done, never free and dramatic way.With few characters and a high profile of Will Smith, which is splendid, Martin Lawrence, director, achieved an estimable science film fiction or anticipation, who knows, banked at certain moments to pure horror movies."With great planning, where we see the immensity of certain completely deserted streets of New York, is conveys perfectly the solitude of the protagonist, increased in scenes like that of the C-Dclub mannequins, with whom tries to keep a minimal conversation.""I am Legend" could have been more spectacular, but the script going in other directions, more intimate, more human, and get, I believe, convince in its more realistic proposal of a world with human beings about to disappear from the face of the Tierra.Pero also, those intimate scenes, complemented with other superb as the attack dogs of the protagonist and his faithful Sam, long scene (second frame), transmitting anguish, fear and emotion in equal parts.By what I have heard and read out there, it seems that the film fails to convince readers of the original novel, but in my opinion is a good movie such as it is designed to be number 1 in the United States of North America, wonder but Will Smith has personality and history is appealing, achieving a very entertaining and interesting film that leaves a good taste in mouth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3380

Plissken

Supersonic man

muchocine

'Supersonic Man' is the Spanish response to the 'Superman' by Richard Donner, perpetrated by Juan Piquer Simón, cornerstone of the fantastic cani.

'Supersonic Man' (1979) is the Spanish response to the 'Superman' by Richard Donner, perpetrated by Juan Piquer Simón, cornerstone of the fantastic cani. It must be said in its favour, with the four hard would have budget Piquer gets one more than worthy exploitation, because it brings together all the ingredients as their famous American copy, even surpassing it at times:-superhero: of course. Supersonic Man goes red and blue, flies, bounce you the bullets, lifts tractors. What is more, it makes disappear surveillance cameras, trucks, and turns guns on bananas! Morir you with envy, Kal - the! In addition, their only weak point fail it to mention, which with a handful of Kryptonite until I could defeat Superman, but not kidding I risk to be turned into a banana by Supersonic Man-Supervillano: OK, Lex Luthor mola. But here we have the diabolical Doctor Gluk (Cameron Mitchell), who kidnaps Professor Borgin to help him turn his laser ray of death. Unfortunately, Gluk is so sure that the Professor will work it does not disturb or torture him, nor in hypnotize you, or anything. Confined to insult him throughout the film, insults Borgin heroically endures. That Yes, Gluk has hair of truth-evil Army: Lex Luthor too lies only in its fight against Superman. On the other hand, Gluk boasts a deployment of troops worthy of Saddam Hussein. His soldiers take a few weapons capable of green people back, and although they seem not very lethal make a cool firing noise. Also have a truck with a label of "laundry", special operations, and of course, the jewel in the Crown: the superrobot, which asa, gas, launches rockets (two) surface-to-air missile, and has up to a webcam that Gluk believe that he is playing Doom. The movements are perhaps not very fluid, but that Luthor had one?-secret identity: Kal - the coming from Krypton, is raised as Clark Kent and works in a newspaper, Fronte after sad glasses. It is a ducks and insecure in his private life. Supersonic Man, on the other hand, is Kronos, a guy with mask to which it resurrect in a ship to carry out a dangerous mission: that earthlings do not destroy the universe to force of giving birth of evil geniuses. Kronos (Michael Coby) down to Earth and takes the human form of Paul to dry (much more secret than Clark Kent), a guy with a mustache and vest of point that is able to say that he is a private detective, invite to dinner at the girl and even try to beneficiár the first night! In addition, cabin you don't need to be changed, just you talk to your Casio digital watch. And to make matters worse, not cut to fly to the nearest restaurant and poach two bottles of champagne if Miss calls. And also very important fact, he himself SE HACE call SUPERSONIC MAN, not as Superman, which is a hype media.-La Chica: here, the truth very little to say. Superman in love with Lois Lane for what it is, a Superman. Supersonic Man, on the other hand, is linked to Patricia Borgin (Diana Polakov) with their more mundane trickery (lies, he invites her to dinner, a slow bailecito). In addition, Patricia does not give the impression of being the most virtuous girl on the planet: to) is for a measly $ 5,000 ransom and still what you think; (and b) while his father is kidnapped, she is dedicated to zorrear with Paul, "private detective".-music: If the Superman fanfare is one of the great themes of John Williams, the 'supersonic man' comprising Peguri/Izaguirre/Attias (the Stock Aitken Waterman of the dance in Hispanic, so for me) is a llenapistas already wishing for themselves Jamiroquai or the Boney m. All rhythm and four bad few words make up the catchy melody that sounds every time that Supersonic Man crosses the sky of Alicante, with picture of NY back (see "how it became" on the page of Juan Piquer, is priceless). Here let the thing in a technical tie.Total, than the movie is what it is, an opportunity for Juan Piquer get people what they asked, in exchange for a fistful of dollars. And it fulfils its mission, such as Supersonic Man. After this title would come classic from the patriotic gore as 'Shiver', 'thousand screaming has the night', 'Slugs' or 'The crack'. And in addition, a series of adaptations of stories by Jules Verne ('mystery on Monster island', 'The sea Devils'). Before launching to destructive criticism, I recommend visiting the page of this authentic man of cinema. Few Spanish directors have worked with people from the category of Peter Cushing and Terence Stamp. And to me thought me it was a noteworthy by-product: superheroes, the Spaniards, what the hell. Visça Superlópez!And a last fact: 'Supersonic Man' was seen by 751.625 people. 'The secret life of words', by 664.753. Absent, by 136.906. How much geek had 79, right? Or perhaps is that there were people that, Yes, that took this as an industry?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3015

Andrés Pons

Alta Tensión

muchocine

Anguish from the brutal appearance of the psychopath in question until a final stretch where the tension is more and not less as usual.

French Alexande Aja that recently signed with mastery the remake of the hills have eyes, it debuted in style with this film where to get as to time not be he witnessed long with a horror film. Anguish from the brutal appearance of the psychopath in question until a final stretch where the tension is more and not less as usual. All this supported by mechanisms of the 80s, where raw that dirty atmosphere where uncompromising face of the gallery we are witnessing a struggle to survive fierce fills with blood sweat and tears. Unfortunately the final surprise totally little credible and Manichean ends up breaking many virtues of an impeccable exercise of pure horror. Recommended anyway. A 7.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1891

Iñaki Bilbao

El abominable hombre de las nieves (The abominable snowman)

muchocine

Little known film from the fantastic genre, admitting that it is pure B series, involving some positive findings.

"A famous doctor and paleontologist is sure to discover the traces of the Yeti, the famous man in the snow." You want to get in touch with him, to try a positive relationship for both parties. "However he faced the expedition with several men who have the same goals in the company".Little known film of fantasy genre (in case of there is no really "The Yeti"), admitting that it is pure B series, involving some positive findings. The most important is the treatment given to the famous man of las nieves, which only comes at the end of the tape, being the moment, no doubt some most beautiful movie. The last few minutes are a great poetry. It is true however that the film suffers from a slightly premioso pace that lastra interest, being altogether somewhat slow. Excellent Peter Cushing and Forrest Tucker, a so-called "secondary" actor that always made him very well.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/454

Kiko de España

Calvaire

muchocine

Hand crafted as few movies lately, tells the story without thunderous shock effect, without musical rises or free scares. Get spook me enough for having to shower after the film to remove mud and blood.

I am seeing "Calvaire", Fabrice Du Welz, because, without being 100% original (something extremely complicated today, hence that piece of 9 that I gave yesterday to "Kiss kiss bang bang"), manages to terrify me enough for having to shower after the film to remove mud and blood.Taking as models to Michael Haneke, "Straw dogs" to "Psycho", "Texas Chainsaw Massacre", to this great movie that was "The dam", Walter Hill, (another day I tell how big that was this man), "Deliverance" and with a European flair than by nearby achieves more terrifying to the Viewer, comoya succeeded in the above-mentioned director of "Time of the Wolf" or Alexandre Aja with "High voltage", hipertramposa movie, but that shows a director with ways and we will return all crazy with his remake of "the hills have eyes".Marc Stevens, a crappy singer, acts in a shabby nursing home. Before, we see how in silence, you makeup to function. We are warned, uncomfortable film and echoes Hanekianos, fasten the belts.When Marc embarks on the journey to his next performance, the van driving is damaged in the middle of nowhere. He began a nightmare of folly, fake reincarnations, torture and brutality. Hand crafted as few movies lately, tells the story without thunderous shock effect, without musical rises or free scares, keeping the viewer in constant tension.It has at least three anthologies sequences, namely: that camera through the window of the van to enter and then leave, the dance of the zumbados of the people (possibly more terrifying seen in a long time), and an overhead plane special, although confusing, vaguely reminiscent of the famous travelling of the overrated "Old boy". Incomprehensibly unprecedented in our country, thank people like Max Renn by recommend, and KesheR, for being a fantastic "subtitulador". A 7´5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2187

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Sed de mal (Touch of Evil)

muchocine

Evil thirst is twisted, dark and tragic. One of those movies you must see before you die is and all that...

For many, even for many of those who have not seen, evil thirst is particularly famous to contain that, according to experts in technical watermarks of the cinema, is the best plano-secuencia ever. Camera, hung in an imposing crane descends sharply towards the couple formed by Charlton Heston and Janet Leigh (Vargas and Susan, his wife) to walk to the other side of the border to take an ice cream. At the time, someone puts a bomb in a car. What comes after is part of that story and should not be taken lightly.I remember I saw evil thirst for a long time and not filled me like now. I remember the sweat. The feeling of physical and mental strain: feeling that has not gone away, continues and, if possible, amplified. I think now more sordid than before: its obscenity is pampered to detail. Also it is sinister: his evil occupies the shadows characters are leaving in this border town between Mexico and the US (Los Robles). Orson Welles is Captain Quinlan, a FAT type to the cartoon, priming by the hatred of his paltry life in a disgusting corner of the world and eaten by a thirst for revenge not fulfilled (his wife was murdered and found the culprit.) Orson Welles reserves the juicy role. Perhaps Charles Laughton, which is one of my weaknesses cinematic, had played it with identical Office. Or Marlon Brando in his last days, before leaving at all. I can not imagine anyone more. Charlton Heston is the official Mexican narcotics you just put behind bars in the border mafia capo and just marry the sosa, inevitably sosa, Janet star. From here, Welles mounted a guignol on corruption and hatred empozoñado and leads the plot through the glassy eyes of the evil Captain Quinlan, which does not stop being a novelty.Evil thirst is twisted, dark (almost all the scenes happen at night) and tragic. Fascinated by the admirable picture of Russell Metty, by the inspiradísima and already immortal music of Henry Mancini (pure mixture of jazz, rock and roll and Latin music) and by the visual delight of his expressionism. Own character of Quinlan is already a fantastic discovery: a tormented man stopped himself, admired by their peers, but evil, in the background, aureolado of an evil rarely seen in the film. It is fundamental to the role of Marlene Dietricht, owner of a slum with piano in which a young Quinlan was "an exceptional man", but the violent death of his wife activates a mechanism of perfidy and impressive atrocity: Quinlan is ruthless, sullen, fierce in their laconic motion scenes.As impressive as the initial contrapicado is the scene in which Quinlan kills Uncle Grandi, another mafioso in poster, in front of a narcotizada Susan Vargas, thrown on a bed, farfullando, opening and closing the eyes shy, weakly: the way in which sausager gloves and place where Welles put the camera so we advise the cerniente tragedy, the fading light of the room, the agonizing death rattle of the victim. Everything contributes to the film teachers of Welles, his uncompromising talent to scrutinize the root of evil, his vast dominion over the human instincts. "Not in vain Orson Welles came to Shakespeare as soon as I could.""Cahiers du cinéma" defined it as "the best film of series B that has ever been made". Perhaps, despite excessive assertion, not missing the reason: the materials used by Welles are poor. The decorations are mínimso. Dialogs are not conspicuous by his genius. How from an irrelevant narrative or a very little props the genius of a director is capable of creating art. Art course, unhealthy, but one of those timeless cinematic experiences that one occasionally comes because you need an anti-wrinkle meeting of cinema in its purest form. Eschatological, in some cases. Symbolically, Quinlan died in a garbage dump.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3772

Oscar Martínez

American Gangster

muchocine

American gangster gift us with both points of view, both worlds, so close yet so distant in reality. For me, one of the best films of this year.

Directed by the now Sir Ridley Scott, able to gift us with real director wonders (the duellists, Alien, Blade runner, Thelma and Louise) or infumables clunkers (the Lieutenant O'Neil, Gladiator, Hannibal, the Kingdom of the heavens), US American Gangster, movie co-starring Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington, which also boasts some side luxury such as Josh BrolinChiwetel Ejiofor and Jon Polito among others.The film we located in the Harlem of the seventies, where the driver of the main mobster of the area decided to monopolize the market for heroin in the neighborhood, extending their networks to the length and breadth of United States making it one of the older history drug traffickers. For its part, a not too popular police will seek to discover of desenmascaralo, and thus uncover the network of police corruption that makes impossible any attempt to put an end to the traffic of drugs in the country.With a length of just over two hours and a half, American gangster is the second foray of Ridley Scott in the dark and profitable world of the mafia after Black rain. And is that American gangster is a mixture of the big titles of the genre, as if Tony Montana from the price of power turn out to become Michael Corleane of the Godfather, in a game of the policeman and the thief in which the characters of Heat and Sérpico recreate French Connection. Thus, can that after saying this American gansgster may sound like a rehash, but señor@s, beans often. In the absence of watch movies as No country for old or Sweeney Todd, I believe that on this occasion the British deserve once and for all the statuette.Going to the movie itself, applies to American gangster covers from the origins of the mafioso Josh Lucas until his arrest, covering a period of fairly broad time, perhaps not so much in Zodiac, but substantial enough to justify its mammoth length. Thus, a server barely dare to eliminate a couple of inconsequential scenes, taking into account that the Assembly of the film is simply perfect.On the other hand, the interpretative duel between Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe is worthy of mention, while the main scourge of the Ridley Scott film lie precisely there, in a possible lack of nerve, in the lack of peak moments over a marathon footage, but thus and everything at any time American gangster allows us take us off of the screen. With a taste of cinema of gangsters between classic and setentero, the movie takes its time to show us both mental and professional evolution of both characters until finally intercrossing their destinations, although, as in Heat, will be fairly complex to see them sharing level.Thus, American gangster gift us with both points of view, both worlds, so close yet so distant indeed, constantly playing with this inherent duality, offering us a duel, so to speak, between Tony Montana and Frank Serpico in a single film. A wonderful film that, as I said, perhaps you lack some nerve (read bad milk), something of Sidney Lumet or, why not, Sam Peckinpah, but by no means less round.For me, one of the best films of this year.I give a 8'5 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1754

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Ciudad del silencio

muchocine

Monumental hodgepodge. Comparable only to the pain of the argument presented to us. So, crappy infumable and shame for their ideadores, who have failed (at any time) to live up to the occasion. The issue is serious enough to not stay in these half-measures.

Acaramelados as some were with the J - as of the glamor and the insured ass in not is how many dollars, this version of the Lopez promised collapse or genius, nothing of neutral media terms. And look at where the bet frog that has come. Do not look for Prince. Bordertown is a poor product of Gregory Nava, director bragado in television (American family or American tapestry) or in the biographical film without excessive artistic pretensions (Selena, with a ten years younger than Jennifer Lopez). Here he has been around long. It has not been able with a very interesting argument: the murder of women in Juarez and the apathy of the Government and their police bodies to tackle this Muskat. Barely saved by the excellent photography of the night Juárez, with his dirt, its urban deterioration and its criminal neon, Bordertown undertake with apathy the denunciation of an excessive barbarism has no (in the film) feet or head. Finished not know what are the crimes, although us of a mild smell where can come shots, and not precisely thanks to the efforts of a plain cast at all times. Antonio Banderas (with a ridiculous role) or Jennifer Lopez (as reporter coming Chicago with hazy past and desire to escalafonar in his career with a story of flashy) consent that we can add one point of interest.If someone wants information about the events in Ciudad Juárez, not search here. Wait: there is just a project of greater height. This is a telefilm to see in a private fashion when it comes to coffee, pastries and brasero creating that sense of home beautiful and that everyone loves so much. The problem (there are) is that the Mexican people victim of this small genocide would have deserved a better film. And they have not.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3114

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La vida en rosa

muchocine

Irregular biopic about the diva of the French song, melodrama on the sins and the glory of a human being abrupt intoxicated by the always inevitably jodidas circumstances.

The road of excess leads to the Palace of wisdom, but then you die young and leave an exquisite corpse. The excess in tone or breath biographical films are highly flammable. Entraen possible that narrative collapses, infected of these excessive, and display a misleading visual appeal-the curiosity always attracts, we are all voyeurs but with formal shortcomings so evident that they inevitably drag the set.Serve this Introit theoretical for La Vie en Rose place, painful hagiography of the diva of the French song Edith Piaf, a lady hooked to the disaster, histrionic, stubborn, brilliant, convulsively addicted to everything as he intoxicara his talent. Or that is what Oliver Dahan proposes: a caramelized deconstruction, a catalogue of public access to the vices of a character of the artistic celebrity. Not just understand what internal motivation that encourages the product, what devious revenge justified the crucifixion. Here the commitment is to provide the panegyric, normally fed loa and biographical compliments of a self-destruction mechanism. It seems (perhaps it is) a vendetta, a frontal attack on the intimate sins of a lady that has contributed to enlarge the music of 20th century heritage, even though I don't have I by Lady fan or have one copy of their albums in my collection of discs. Anyway, the film contains traces of excellent film and is not possible (in honesty) to stick only with this ominous backroom portrayed. Film is fiction or reality, always has given us the same. We cannot remain with the figure of the diva escalafonada to success and collapsed in failure. The antipathy of Edith Piaf, an actress in State of grace called Marion Cotillard, her emotional collapse, its still personality of dark passions and infinite hatred, is the visible hook of a franco-checa production - British, in the panorama of the biopics, jutting. And not to be a display of virtuosity or by cause insobornables adhesions but because moves away from the sweet tone that permeates other tapes in the industry and does not offer easy solutions and old roads. Sins, however, of simplicity: the desire to get out of the norm has hindered a generic and bright vision of the life of the artist and will have privileged, instead, flashes too spectacular (say), scattered sweets - unfortunately - flowing into an imperfect vehicle of endiosamiento of a monument of French culture.The inventory of misfortunes that perlan footage help that I understand the chaotic and unhealthy nature of the singer, but they tarnished a biography over adjusted, less overload to the spectacle of the morbid. In addition, the footage is excessive and repetitive, causing the patient spectator contradictory sensations. It writes felt, at times, disappointed, thrilled, sentimental, violent, bored. It is not possible to then give absolute blessings to this, basically forgettable melodramatic artifact. Not turning it to oblivion or the cold shelf of the films of balance. Only for the inconsumerable lead actress deserves this chronicler of his vices tempered any hint of dissatisfaction and openly recommend this display of moral toxins.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3868

Andrés Pons

Interview

muchocine

We have a fierce criticism of the world of celebrity with genuine nasty where nothing is what it seems. A work against the flow of the current film.

The late filmmaker, writer, Dutch actor THEO VAN GOG who gave much speak for his liberal ideas of great radical and anti-clerical expressed in some of his best-known films as LUGGER or BLIND DATE.A very controversial man was killed in 2004, leaving many jewels after if, in one of them one of the most special players in the industry HOLLYWODIENSE is fixed. I am referring to STEVE BUSCEMI a man I don't have a spectacular body, nor blockbusters, also starred in major scandals. Gaining respect in the independent scene where he worked with people of the stature of TARANTINO in RESERVOIR DOGS or several times with TOM DICILLO, fresh their last collaboration in DELIRIOUSSin doubt of such illustrious teachers well learned the trade in his facet in the direction giving small wonders in TREES LOUNGE, ANIMAL FACTORI.Two men so suggestive come together in this work where the American made a forceful REMAKE of the work of the European.To choose your partner opted for the brilliant actress SIENNA MILLER seen in casanova or STARDUST, which unfortunately is best known for his romance with JUDE LAW that demonstrated enormous talent.Two great actors, a good script, a single scenery is enough to tangle in a power struggle between the committed journalist and star tonta.¿Es so dumb star? Does not trap? The surprises occur in a story that leads with great agility narrative helped with a large photograph that gives solo decor elegance is required.Shot with three cameras in hand is vested that overwhelming pace as they move the surprises because the cunning of women is greater that that of the journalist sacándole all their dirty laundry.Despite everything is therefore a more appropriate for the theater film as it progresses you notice an anarchic abuse of the dialogue that leads to disorient the Viewer to save the boredom in a surprising final plot.We have a fierce criticism of the world of celebrity with genuine nasty where nothing is what it seems. A work against the flow of the current film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/404

Ibán Manzano

La joven del agua

muchocine

He expressed his philosophy by resorting to a caricature of the characters and situations of a no-brainer alarming. Too naive, even to be a story.

The pool dives in which the girl of water, is transformed by minutes, since his original foreword until its final moral, in an ocean full of findings and successes make the new film by M. Night Shyamalan a whimsical fantasy. Because with his latest Shyamalan, who is first and foremost a great Narrator, he has risked more than ever; Girl with water is a tale known unfinished; and remember the ancient oral stories, those that they invented on the young marchaLa of the water history of improvised and elongated, is a fiction about the fear we all have inside to assume our responsibilities, for which Shyamalan proposes as an antidote, as you would with the forest, the unity of the community. But, on this occasion, the result is rather unsuccessful, not only because it allows some of his best ideas will dilute in the plot, perhaps by disjointed; but above all because it expresses his philosophy by resorting to a caricature of the characters and situations of a no-brainer alarming. Too naive, even to be a story.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1727

Francisco Bellón

Days of glory

muchocine

Days of Glory denounces a deep historical injustice and pays deep tribute to those soldiers? indigenous?, but as film is not at the height of the story that counts.

The image that has always shown (especially American) film of the war is an image of patriotism, heroism, sacrifice and nobility, regardless of what conflict concerned. Cinema served in United States to lift the morale of a nation and encourage it to continue a war (World War II) liberated thousands of kilometres away, and therefore all war films of the era in general were mere pamphlets. Then became Kubrick in paths of glory, and the genre entered deeper oblivion with the wars of Korea and especially Vietnam.Pero wars are not like he has painted us them the film, that face values as the nobility of sacrifice are the suffering, pain, hunger, hardship for the civilian population, and the deathin many cases absurd and meaningless. With the purely propagandistic heroism always are unsung heroes, and in many conflicts there are always unfairly forgotten heroes. Days of Glory, Rachid Bouchareb tells the story of a group of these unsung heroes, of Moroccan and Algerian volunteers who fought against the nazi Germany by France. Days of Glory pays deep tribute to those men, and demand a fair restoration of her memory. This is the main virtue of a film that is nonetheless at the height of the story has. The tape is full of big ups and downs, and lacks the intensity necessary to catch completely to the Viewer, and the lack of pace and excessive length, ends up losing his attention. To any history lover film you will know, that stays on the surface of many things, such as practical accountability of the French Army (both homeland and colonies) to the invaders. The height of the absurdities is the character of Sergeant Roger Martinez, who barely know anything but that assigned an Arab origin. Performances are good as a whole, especially emphasizing Sami Bouajila and Jamel Debbouze.Days of Glory it denounces a deep historical injustice and it pays deep tribute to "indigenous" soldiers, but that film isn't at the height of the story has. After this, we wonder when will the time for France to recognize the Spanish Republicans who had fought in the French Foreign Legion, and were the first soldiers allies in walking the streets of Paris in vehicles with names such as Teruel, Belchite and Brunete.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/947

Francisco Bellón

The holiday

muchocine

When the film takes a vacation. Christmas fever Ray in the collective madness, and the Mecca of cinema, as broadcaster for American values sometimes, is dedicated to sell to the rest of unhappy his vision of the festivities.

Some months ago we warned of the need to create a new genre or subgenre in cinema, the Christmas films. Before the Chronicle, and if continues much more will become terminal, lack of original ideas in Hollywood (either by lack of original proposals or because no one dares with them), all kinds of prefabricated films proliferate like mushrooms. In United States by the Christmas fever Ray in the collective madness, and the Mecca of cinema, as broadcaster for American values sometimes, is dedicated to sell to the rest of unhappy his vision of the festivities. A vision where everything is pink color, people laughing in the streets and there is no hint of despair or concerns.And for more inri, if responsible for that message in a movie is Nancy Meyers, known pastry, the end result can be truly devastating. In his previous work, when least you as you wait, showed his ability for sweetening a tape during its first hour was entertaining and rarely, fun. It is unlikely that perhaps, just perhaps, Jack Nicholson and Diane Keaton collaborate in the potability of the film. But back to what now concerns us, these holidays; Amanda (Cameron Diaz) and Iris (Kate Winslet) are two women who have virtually nothing in common, except that both have suffered recent disappointments in their relationships. Through the internet, they exchange lives, taking a well deserved holiday. The proposal is rather simple, as it was hoped, the script there is no where grasp it, lacks of grace, which in the case of a romantic comedy should not be cause for astonishment. Characters of encephalogram flat, not to mention the situations, as predictable as if the viewer has a crystal ball in his hands. As if few were the incentives to run and not look back, more than two hours of footage are able to break down the viewer more hardened in such combat the height is everything around the character of Elli Wallach, a real subplot of helping one's neighbor and improvement made in USA. Against such background, they can do anything Cameron Diaz and Kate Winslet, absent from beginning to end, or a lost Jude Law.Pero must acknowledge a point in favor of holiday. Before the proximity of food excesses of the holiday season, those attending the film will end up with so dulcificadas arteries, which the only seeing a few candies or marzipan cause them cold sweats and a few impulsive desire to put land of through.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1372

Nobody's perfect

13 tzameti

muchocine

The term thriller falls short when it comes to frame this film that recovers the best of the genre of film noir, which is approaching from a new approach.

Do the directorial debut of director of Georgian origin? although settled in France - Géla Babluani is a striking and brilliant tale full of rawness and tension that make this film a strong promise of recent times. Filmed in black and white, with the characteristic visual stylization of the best film noir, which adds some "dirt" on the image that makes it off in realism, 13 Tzameti gradually introduces us, with a formal touch expressionist, in an environment increasingly squalid and suffocating, corrupted and degraded, town of "characters vampire who feed on the blood of others". In every film noir movie, the criminal act is the crux of the plot? disservice to makes the trailer for the film the viewer gutting it - that the director approaching gradually getting to create ever greater expectation. Babluani shows us how its protagonist/anti-hero (played by George Babluani, brother of the director) is approaching towards him, the crux of the argument, or rather is involved in it, voluntarily and involuntarily at the same time. Reaching a point where there is no possible return into something that started almost as a single game, follow the instructions in a letter addressed to someone else. The viewer with ability to empathize with the main character can end up accumulating high levels of tension and nervousness grabbed to the armchair, imbued with an atmosphere of growing claustrophobic as the screenplay progresses. The characters are minimally profiled in the objective and material issues of their lives. Little is known of their motivations. However, they are deeply analyzed in his psychology and embody perfectly (perhaps by this biographical minimalism) the sensation of absolute solitude, isolation, uprooting and helplessness. Characters who commit the most despicable acts, without any moral question. It is that, at the end and all, what impact us. The perversion of a human being completely dehumanised. The end result is a shocking metaphor for the absence of morality and conscience that can reign in human nature. This way became the film in an arid and harsh criticism of the morality of the society, without any concession to the hope of trust in goodness or reason for the man. Without mercy, unadorned, 13 Tzameti shows us the worst of what is capable human beings, in their not so much money, that yearning also, but of extreme sensations that escape from normality and approaching the darker morbidity. The merit is that everything is possible and credible. Is the man a wolf to man? Bablauni answered in the affirmative to the question with this film. Pure pessimistic fatalism brought to the screen with great skill.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1834

Tito Chinchan

Moscow Zero

muchocine

Movie galleries and underlays, tells us that there is a world under the cities and that almost better not visit it. It is not bad, can be seen, tells a curious story and is very dark. I liked.

Once seen the movie, what you were looking for the cover to put it, I have encountered some data of the film. One says that it is shot in Moscow, as the name of the film implies, but I asked me, why are there thanks to the end the city of Valencia, its police, its paellas and up to the fallera mayor? I think that it was shot in Valencia, but not me do much attention. Incidentally, the Director has a very nice nickname, moon, what does if not see that it was shot in Valencia, or the Moon of Valencia is not famous? The festival of humor here, concludes I swear it.The film is about a researcher type who gets in subsurface soils of Moscow to discover a very strange story about men, marginal and demons. Everything is born from the era of the tsars, but it is shot in modernity. As it seems that it takes to return the waiter, mounted an expedition consisting of a priest, a girl, a resentful researcher and two thugs who do not have nor media host (one is Arturo helmsmen, camera Café). And they get into the subsurface, Hey, are excavated almost almost to the center of the Earth, and then they get with the works of the Gallardon. do well what you want to say you? To me the movie I liked, coinciding with my medium Zucchini. Fear, what is said of fear, is not. Come on, I have not heard that it was scary until I have not read a critique that put "of terror". The interesting thing is the story told, through the reading of a book on the events that occurred in that place and led to what happened next. The choice of actors is not bad, and Mr Kilmer should go to Corporación Dermoestética to slices, do you that does not fit into the plane. What I did not like nothing at all is that is so dark. I prefer a little less than environment and that will see better what happens.In short, movie galleries and underlays, tells us that there is a world under the cities and that almost better not visit it. It is not bad, can be seen, tells a curious story and is very dark. I liked.You have to be generous, to one that has funds of all and I liked.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1301

Iñigo

La ciencia del sueño

muchocine

Gondry persevering, reinventing and staying in the attempt.

In an attempt to continue with his bizarre visual ideas, already established in "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind", Gondry braid a story in which the Ditto, precisely, occupies a segundísimo plane. "Sure, Charlie Kaufman was not present was expected.""The Science of Sleep" speaks of the need to dream, to create our own inner world, to defend ourselves against the boredom of the outside world, of a stagnant and decadent reality in the routine. And the need to fight for love. Once again.The author of the "Human Nature" horny launches a visually interesting proposal, but with a somewhat lacking script hook and stands as a clear example of return to the last path creating a continuation with its own identity.But the main reason why a movie buff comes to watch a film of Gondry is see how manages without the genius of Kaufman. Had to check if the French director is able to get away with a film project with all his weight, beyond of proposed videocliperas for MTV. And to its form, is possibly making a hole. But still interesting, fails to rid of his past. Nor by the side of Kaufman of MTV.When one sits down to see "The science of the dream", you cannot avoid thinking about films of the extent of the own "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" of the same director before us (albeit with the invaluable help of one of the most transgressors writers of recent times) or "Punch Drunk Love" by Paul Thomas Anderson.And it is that the shadow of the teachers is too elongated.Gondry proposal here is almost the same as his previous film. A peculiar, convoluted, fun, modern way of defining romanticism. Reinventing the romantic genre. Exceed its barriers taking everything to the limit. But the invention is already patented. And the irregularity makes an excessive Act of presence.Although, at times, the feeling of "déjà vu" leaves the viewer a light aura of torpor, which causes certain bumps in the viewing of the film and avoids that we continue the story with total interest (eyelids weigh too), are well some hilarious moments, situations and bizarre scenes and ingenious gags that we raise at once and start to laugh.His absurd, metaphorically surreal humor while already exploited, indeed it generates reared situations in tronchante and delirious. You do not know where to put when Stéphane opens his mouth to release one of their brutal occurrences. Gael García Bernal does a great job, as well as quite distanced from their previous jobs. Shows like a fish in water in an area unknown to him: that of the absurd comedy.But he is not the only deranged mental "The Science of Sleep". The staff side is an authentic Gallery of "freaks", which give us phrases and situations more ludicrous and laughable.It is not humorous and witty point the only thing remarkable film. Also, the visual aspect is interesting. From decorated cardboard/stone, simulating movements close to a "stop-motion" rarefied up situational imagery of more curious.Gondry draws on expertise to give us an image for nothing abusive from the dramatic point of view, nor free. It exercises a great developer power to follow in detail the course of history and its meaning.And he ends up giving the work a relatively intimate character. This way Gondry last proposal could be defined. Unlike his previous film, this focuses more on fun and optimism. Less melancholy. More child (some would say that it sins in excess of naïve). More tender. And, indeed, without his magic and genius.Yes. "The science of sleep" is simply an attempt to continue the trail that a director is intended to leave. Why not he ceases to be fun and interesting, but after a certain time, one forgets what he has seen. Or "Punch Drunk Love" nor, of course, "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" leave that we forget them.Gondry, on this occasion, has failed to give the final touch to make it something else. In one major film.It has become a valid attempt to but I try relatively unsuccessful at the end and all. Gives the feeling that the film lacks soul and, therefore, beyond survival of our eyes.Time will tell if its separation from Kaufman to gain greater prominence with his films has been fruitful. Or if instead and as a co-star Spike Jonze, should have opted for the genius and the "security" of protection of a screenwriter with innate talent. But? has someone said that Gondry may not have? Everything remains to be seen. And everything will end settling where deserves.Hopefully not fall into his own trap and let his past to focus a little on his own personality of "cinema" that he intends to create.So far, is is already winning its first defenders and his early detractors. Point forced all Director that comes out a little than usual.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4147

Iñaki Bilbao

Un taxi para Tobruk

muchocine

Well-meaning pacifist allegation, which is the best thing that goes for it, as well as the interpretative quality of its actors, all of them excellent (Lino Ventura, Charles Aznavour, Hardy Krüger).

"Close to Tobruk, where is one that has waged a bloody battle between Allied troops and Germans, with heavy casualties, four men, allies, manage to escape, through the desert, with a hilarious jeep." This is attacked by aircraft and they should continue on foot. When they are exhausted, they are initiators with a group of Germans, who kill. All but one who take prisoner."It's a captain, decorated with the cross of Hierro.Al principle your relationship will be clear enemies, but little by little will be known and becoming, increasingly, comrades". "- Is that you are insensitive to nostalgia, brigadier Dudu? - No, but I don't like to think about the past." "That is I leave the limpets and crabs".Well-meaning pacifist allegation, that is the best thing to say of it, as well as the interpretative quality of its actors, all of them excellent.Although the director has worthy films, here happens from conventional, but well it is true that it is carried compentemente and dialogs are worthy.The development of events, not too many, is credible and the spectator gets involved in history thanks to the clear anti-war critical intent.It is therefore positive and only for this reason already worth their vision.Even views the two with perspective, it can be said, at least I so I appreciate, that is a clear antecedent of the great "hell in the Pacific", by John Boorman and Toshiro Mifune and Lee Marvin's protagonists.In the order of the curiosities, the copy I saw on television lacked strangely in its original form, that is, to full screen. Strange to the broadcast a chain that takes care of this aspect, but on this occasion, once again had to settle, in many scenes, hear the characters instead of seeing them. In this regard, I can say without riesto to mistaken that saw him just 25% of the times you get on screen to the always excellent Hardy Kruger.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/175

Hombre Lobo

Psicosis

muchocine

It is still a master class of cinematic technique, a work in which each level is simply perfect.

Hitchcock is, without a doubt, the most plagiarized director in the history of cinema. And all of his films, probably none has been so repeatedly warped and "honored" as psycho (1960), a film that is perfect example of what what are talking about when we say "foundational work". It would be too long to offer here a list of all the movies that have earned it, especially those belonging to the sub-genre slasher, which Hitchcock tape is clear precursor. It is one of two "horror" movies appearing on the sacrosanct list of the 100 best American movies in history, according to the American Film Institute (which injustice), which occupies the 18 box. While time has diminished a little disturbing effect which took in his time, it is still a master class of cinematic technique, a work in which each level is simply perfect.But at that time certainly not him was thus that its production not differed much from any product of series B. In fact, psychosis was filmed in the same studies in which by then was the television series Alfred Hitchcock presents. Its budget was quite moderate, and apparently the only one who believed in the potential of the film was the director himself, who bought the rights to the novel by Robert Bloch (on which is based the script) and even bought all the copies that was able to make so lower the amount of people that knew about the end of the story.Today all we know: in an outburst decided to change once his miserable life, the fatal blonde Marion Crane steals a considerable amount of money to his boss and flees to California, stopping to spend the night in the paragraph motel Bates, where is served by its solitary and seemingly harmless owner, Norman. The rest certainly know, a history of transvestism, complex of Oedipus and mass murder.It is difficult to believe for our time that psychosis caused an impact so great in the public of 1960, but it was, and for many reasons. What sometimes escapes us is that this film was genuinely innovative in many aspects, from silly details (the first film where pulled a toilet chain) to decisions that changed the habits of the audience (was one of the films that broke with the old tradition of "continuing functions", at the request of the own Hitchcock)(, who did not want that people enterase of Janet Leigh, the only star of the cast, died in the first half of the film). But above all, gave to the public then a load of perversity that it wasn't used, an idea of the evil left being cartoonish or supernatural and passed to form part of what is most hidden in man: the unconscious. The Hitchcock film is undoubtedly the first thriller "adult" that inspired the idea of the horror could come from the heart of the American family.During the 109 minutes of psychosis we are constantly experiencing a sense of danger, crouched before waiting for something terrible. When this finally happens, in the already pervasive and hiperparodiada shower scene with no less unforgettable music of Bernard Herrmann, the impact is brutal. But even more dramatic and plot, Excellencies and above the main achievement of the film is having succeeded in establishing an aesthetic and a way of making films that dominates the Hollywood industry until today. Hitchcock, fully aware of the power of the camera man, polishes each sequence to perfection. The scene of the shower, nerve center of the film, is a clear example of that, with the water running in swirling until the drain where escapes the blood (and life) of Marion Crane, until that long zoom-out begins in the eye of the victim and which ends at the pile of forgotten money on the table at nightshowing us that the motive for the crime has not been the pursuit of profit, but the dark passages of madness. It is the irrationality of evil, summarized in the affable and even ridiculous figure of Norman Bates. Old enemies of America are gone, the World War II fascist were dead, and even Russian Communists seemed less dangerous than the horrors that could trigger deep in the heart of the country. If this is not the main theme of all horror movies to come in later decades, someone tell me.But isn't this what most impresses of psychosis. Their audience didn't scared and appalled by his erotic or violent cargo, nor by the sociological connotations of its plot, not even for their excellent performances. If something is left of this masterpiece, it is that film in its pure State. Without any doubt.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1450

Rafa Ferrer

La Novia Cadaver

muchocine

I will say without shame that we have one of the best films of animation of the year, there are a couple of planes in the tape that are well worth the price of the entrance to the room to see them.

I will say without shame that we have one of the best films of animation of the year, there are a couple of planes in the tape that are well worth the price of the entrance to the room to see them, the tape, the Burton style tells situations calculated almost to the millimeter and that nothing happens in the tape "because if" but that everything has a raison d ' être and finally (Ribbon only lasts an hour and a quarter) the result doesn't disappoint.Furthermore, although towards the middle of the tape the low film a bit of pace, the end result is excellent, the music of Danny Elfman (Burton collaborator) does not break at any time the narration, and although it is not a movie especially recommended for kids of the House, the older difrutarán it from beginning to end.Cuidadisima the aesthetics of one and the other side (the world of the living and the world of the dead.) the Victorian of the film is measured and studied ambiance, and the beginning of the film, perhaps with a couple of "bad baba" to Disney notes make it very hypnotic that leaving the film one not can stop thinking about the movie over and over again.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/679

Jesus Lens

Infiltrados

muchocine

Martin has known as lend the Ember to its sardine, and based on an alien idea, has released images much of his obsessions, inclinations, inner demons, you philias and phobias.

"Infiltrated" is a great film by Martin Scorsese. And with those eight words I would already be all. "But, as the butcher would say, let's go by parts.""Infiltrators" is the update, the occidentalizante remake of an Eastern, "Infernal affairs", which, I believe, are happening in Canal +, but still have not seen, so we can not compare the original product with its North American version. Personally, I don't care of will emerge where the inspiration of a guionista-director when writing - shoot his film, provided that do it well and interests me, involved and excited both what counts as the way in which does it. "In the case that concerns us, since then, Martin has known as lend the Ember to its sardine and, based on an alien idea, it has made images much of his obsessions, inclinations, inner demons, philias and phobias.""Infiltrators" is a great movie that lasts two and a half hours, is filmed with luxurious means, but very well exploited and features a cast of actors to remove the hat. A cast headed by the sober and excellent Leonardo DiCaprio and Matt Damon, the counterpoint of the excessive, always unique, wonderful and unique Jack Nicholson and the counterweight of the very measured, solid and perfectly characterized MartinSheen, Mark Whalberg and Alec Baldwin. A great film that has many things to a devilish pace, although it has a bump towards the middle of the footage that lastra somewhat the story and, therefore, not allowing us to the great masterpiece that we were waiting; lacks a point to be able to celebrate the return of the Martin hard and great, of the best film of the last decades. Much written, "Infiltrators" isn't at the height or of "One of ours", the zenith in the Filmography of Scorsese, and, I believe, nor at the height of "Casino", fuller, more vigorous, better achieved.That Yes, "infiltrators" is, undoubtedly, a film by Martin Scorsese. Its subject matter, visual images, by their camera movements, treatment by the characters that has created, and especially by the impressive soundtrack accompanying the film, even though it has songs from the Rolling Stones, Roger Waters, the Beach Boys or the Allman Brothers, has found its best music discovery is the impressive song "I am shipping up to Boston", of the Dropkick Murphys, a band so wild as toughest sequences of the film, which mixed the céltico-festivo air of the bagpipes with a phrasing punk that bands such as Rancid, the Pogues and the Clash did not put a but.Yet I still have a lot of things to say about "Infiltrators". As I write about it, the strength of many of the powerful images which has shot Scorsese grows. So I'm going to make themes for a second review. As the striking end of the film, which connects directly with another majestic final of "Taxi driver". I keep a few thoughts on the figure of the double and the loss of identity and other things, that one could be defined as heretical, on the undoubted influence of television series "24" and "The Sopranos" in this excellent "Infiltrated", both in the form and in the background.PD.-Do not fail to review the four songs that the Dropkick Murphys have hanging in your site on MySpace. Pure dynamite! Starts with the film "I´m shipping up to Boston". and it continues.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/369

Berto

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

One continuation rather than worthy of that great film which is the first part, entertaining equal or more than its predecessor, although this falls much more in sensationalism than in the old regustillo of the old movies.

Jack Sparrow has returned to sailing the seas. Continuing the success that took part in around the world in 2003, Disney decided to exploit the goose that lays the golden eggs with a return to the old films of pirates and was released to record the second and third part at a stretch, to thus cut costs and problems of compatibility with the main actors in the film. It is in this summer of 2006 which comes Pirates of the Caribbean: the chest of the dead man, continuing exactly where we left off Pirates of the Caribbean: the curse of the Black Pearl. Will and Elizabeth are about to marry, but for having helped the escape of Jack Sparrow are imprisoned and sentenced to death. This is sufficient for Will Turner, commanded by Lord Beckett, go in search of Jack Sparrow, which is sufficiently busy trying to save his soul because of an ancient Pact with the pirate Davy Jones. From here, and as expected, thousand and one adventures and journeys throughout all Caribbean Spanish. in this second part take precedence and much incredible situations. If the first part of what made it a success that was around the films of Errol Flynn with duels of swords, approaches and other pirates classic situations, in this second part pulling in excess of special effects, removing a part of the magic and that old taste of great adventure film that distilled the first. Why not the film loses strength, the scenes are the most spectacular, but make it a too visual spectacle when the best would have been to have remained in the same style. That if, despite this change from the classical to the special effect adventure, history does not lose too, remains a pure entertainment of two hours and half in which the major protagonist, separate special effects, is Captain Jack Sparrow. Here Johnny Depp leaves bring still more back in the pirate half amanerado, without feelings and totally rogue, constructing a totally overloaded interpretation in relation to the first part, and but the scenes in which runs in this second part I refer. A real enjoyment to see it on screen, because when the sale removes the leading role the rest of actors, which are more or less correctillos.Orlando Bloom repeats his role of Will Turner, and in this second part sees a Will Turner much more charismatic than in the first part, though still not even remotely to the packing and personality that distills Jack Sparrow. As for Keira Knightley, she if going to worse, dedicating himself to put the same face of horny throughout the film and doing the worst role for my taste of the entire film. Note well that this change of personality are things of the script plan more independent woman who does not fear anything to go in search of his beloved, but is becoming repellent in some scenes, and but for the beach scene I refer, for anyone who has already seen the film.The rest of side are in his line. Bill Nighty, is everything it rather than special effects leave work with that makeup/prosthesis which makes it completely unrecognisable, being his eyes the only thing that can bring the actor for his portrayal of the evil Pirate/Squid Davy Jones. Attentive incidentally to the acentillo that have put you in the Spanish version, the truth that has its charms. Stellan Skarsgård, correct in his role as Bill the boots, Will Turner's father, and repeated again all the former crew of the Black Pearl, incorporating the very booming lately Naomie Harris in the role of aunt Dalma, very inspired character in my opinion in the video game series also pirate Monkey Island and this September 8 will be able to see her sharing poster with Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx in Miami Vice.La so very discretita address by Gore Verbinsky. Plans comprehensive teaching pretty good action, thing welcome in times videocliperos in which we find ourselves, although with a great failure, because still do not understand account that comes this horrible initial level to slow that stretches unnecessarily and that still did not I've found sense.Of the script can little comment either. Typical phrases, and more of it than the first of the parties, that links in history with many of the things in the first part, leaving the comic part above all to the character of Jack Sparrow. Ultimately, a continuation rather than worthy of that great film which is the first part, entertaining equal or more than its predecessor, although in this falls a lot more in sensationalism than in the old regustillo of the old movies. As it could not be otherwise, they leave an ending that you makes you want to kill them, the style of the two towers, and leaving us with the question of which will be the end of the adventure for Jack, Elizabeth and Will in this third installment it premiered in May 2007 and at present only we know that it developed in the South seas.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3825

Andrés Pons

Alien vs Predator 2

muchocine

I certainly expected it exceeds at least the first part, it exceeds go if it fares worse because it is still worse, more boring, less defined characters, catastrophic interpretations, without any sense fights filmed rhythm of video clip.

I think I'm a bit masochistic because not to lack a Lynx to appear that this single film could be a pestiño.We all know that both ALIEN and PREDATOR separately were two myths of fantasy at the time giving two films as notable as filled with action and terror.Over time some luminaries came face to mythical monsters to attract fans to the battle, the first attempt to balance with a resounding success in the mediocre but at least fun FREDDY VS JASON, was obviously born in this way a new form of storm the box office, so do not miss another confrontation with the ALIENS and PREDATORS being resolved their differences in one of the largest ever shot nonsense which resulted above boring.In an attempt to take advantage of the goose that lays the golden eggs is responsible for the sequel to the STREUSE brothers specialists in special effects in numerous blockbusters such as the X-MEN saga or 300. surrounding himself with a young cast very little known where they emphasize JHON ORTIZ makes double on the Bulletin Board with its intervention in AMERICAN GANGSTER and STEVEN I triumphed in the television series RESCUEME. I certainly expected it exceeds at least the first part, it exceeds go if it fares worse because it is still worse, more boring, less defined characters, catastrophic interpretations, without any sense fights filmed rhythm of video clip.Only thing notable are its special effects for that invested almost the entire budget. Of course the script is again absent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3812

Rafa Ferrer

Odette

muchocine

An excellent French comedy that will delight all lovers of "Amelie" and other productions...

Lately in the French film I'm finding with real jewelry, small films made without great pretensions but always leave footprint, tapes as "The boys of the choir", "rivers of color purple" (which has nothing to raise to "code Da Vinci") or even "Amelie" belt with which it shares a kind of relationship and that, however (and luckily for my) have nothing to do; and is that to me this movie seems much more nice, simple and earthly to the Muse of Montmatre.Desde the first time one realizes that Odette (for my all an attractive Catherine Font discovery), is like any ordinary neighbor that we have at home, with its flaws and its virtues, with an innate joy by very bad that the go things, in addition to a great desire to live, and that injects the rest of characters that touch of optimism that the tape needs, and is that we we have the typical movie "deja Lees" and good taste a completion.It is true that the rest of the actors are normal for my all completely unknown (I have already said that I'm bit in cinema of the country neighbour.), although it is also true that they could learn in Spain to make films of this size, will perhaps be that French Cinema Act works and that of Spain is nothing more than a mantra cries crumbs 4 dandies who want to sweep for House without knowing well take the broom.Leaving aside my every day clearer Mania towards Spanish film (if e.g. that.) highlight not only the excellent planning of the scenes (many of them musical numbers), in addition to the argument, which is a simple (very simple) but at the same time excellent also, and that end that although overused and ubiquitous from the beginning no longer surprise.Finally, Spanish producers take example of France and launch to make films of this kind, the public and their pockets thank you.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2144

Rafa Delgado

El número 23

muchocine

Aburridísima, heavy and predictable. Quite silly, where at the end you can glimpse in the distance intentions to go back a tad flight, but fails miserably. The 'Scary Movie' psychological thrillers.

Battery of questions: in 'The number 23', what is the key? What it gives meaning to the tape? The obsession of the character of Jim Carrey, is not it? Well then - horrific - script fails miserably when it comes to portray with a minimum of realism and seriousness the obsession of the protagonist, and the story in general. All exaggerates and takes it too seriously, so much that just becoming quite laughable and looking like a parody 'Scary Movie' type of Fincher or Lynch, and other psychological thrillers films. It also lengthens it too much, to the point that last an hour has not gone absolutely nothing on screen.Scenes such as those of the dog in the middle of the road (and the halt!), the suicide of a woman and Jim Carrey Crouching on the spot of an old degollando are (by why are executing?) or of a thousand conversations, dialogues and situations nonsense, incoherent, with too much moralina and verbiage child and empty, not to mention the hundreds of super nonsense badly treated and taken to the limit on the number 23already part of the honorable and legendary range of comic and/or stuffed sequences in the history of cinema.It consists in the databases that this film is thriller, but it seems being on vacation in the hundred tedious minutes that lasts the film. If the main mystery of the film were well created and well resolved, because it would have been a more or less decent entertainment, but not even that, because suspense is more decaffeinated (of truth that someone felt really in suspense?) and topic and, moreover, the rhythm is almost non-existent. And then there is ultimately that of those who are so fashionable now, the "finales-recapitulación", that return to review all the details of the plot, not going to be that we not pillemos in its entirety the byways of this script taaan worked and polished. Screenplay that seems to have been written by Iker Jiménez or, if I hurry, by Pete Doherty.Las - more than nothing anecdotal - shares of my goddess Virginia Madsen and Jim Carrey (sorry, it is that this woman has me madly in love), which I thought smarter to accept some papers as undesirable as those who interpret 'The number 23', do not help anything.Aburridísima, heavy and predictable. Quite silly, where at the end you can glimpse in the distance intentions to go back a tad flight, but fails miserably. It would have been a funny short film. but not. With the permission of 'Ghost Rider' (how great!), one of the worst films in what have been in 2007.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/683

Matías Cobo

Infiltrados

muchocine

Wild and peppered with kid black humor, The Departed is the best tape cooked by the DiCaprio Scorsese society.

Scorsese returns to the streets with a brutal bloodbath of frenetic pace. There is no truce in this film where violence marks from the House of the New Yorker permeates all the footage. Backed by a solid cast in which DiCaprio shows that, without doubt, is one of the great (I must confess my reluctance with him at the beginning of his career) and in which Nicholson rein to its more wild histrionics, infiltrates (The Departed) have left you is a lesson of film rhythm, a display of mastery in the millimeter using narrative elements. About perhaps began to find some 'but', is may branding little plausible some sequences, although the result of this film (based on the classic crime film Infernal Affairs Hong Kong) leaves no why be magnificent. His argument proposes a game of 'topos' infiltrated into two opposing camps: the police and a band of Irish mobsters.The two protagonists we are presented schematically and effectively in a brief exchange of sequences in parallel. If to Billy Costigan (Leonardo DiCaprio) always you stalked the crime of Mafia family, Colin Sullivan (Matt Damon) environment, on the other hand, he attracted the world of crime from small in view of how easy that was to make money by the side of that environment. Both entered the Police Academy, but if Sullivan hits get you with astonishing ease, Costigan will pass by a via crucis for overcoming his family legacy and prove his worth as a policeman. Between the two lies the ruthless mafia boss Frank Costello (Jack Nicholson); Costello sponsored since childhood to Sullivan and had all kinds of dealings with the uncle of Costigan, another legend in the world of organized crime. Alone and decided to not to approach the environment following the isolated example of honesty of his father, Billy will be forced by their superiors (Mark Wahlberg and Martin Sheen) to infiltrate the Organization of Costello to help dismantle her. But his work will be constantly sabotaged by the Fink of Costello in the ad hoc group of researchers that goes behind him, his godson Sullivan mention aside deserves the role of Nicholson, unleashed as long not he saw in a role of sadistic, womanizer and amoral accomplished that, given his own biography of Jack, comes as a ring to the finger. However, I did not finish convince the love triangle between Sullivan, Costello and the psychiatrist who treats it, Madolyn (Vera Farmiga).The aesthetics of the levels or the choice of musical themes, with the repeated appearance of the Shelter Guimme of the Stones, carry the unmistakable rubric of the perfectionist Scorsese. Wild and peppered with kid black humor, The Departed is the best tape cooked by the DiCaprio Scorsese society. Gans of New York was halfway of excellence, but it is a notable film, and would rescue the Aviator I only them some aspects, such as the deepening of the paranoid mind of Howard Hughes. When asked machaconamente if this year you will be finally Oscar, Scorsese responds that he only cares that his work like the public to continue working on new projects. I think, because it seems easy to make cinema in these times in which the industry has resumed with force control of studies. Therefore, is to rejoice that Italian-born filmmaker stays in such good shape, because so may continue exhibiting his film wisdom in future projects.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2774

Kiko de España

Mutantes en la Universidad

muchocine

I think for the moment I can say, when they ask me what is the worst movie I've seen in my life, that this honor lies in "Mutants in the University".

You have to fuck. Last night, the Omega Man and I had where to choose and we are left with "Mutants in the University", I suppose that by the title and his horny sonority. Go more horrible sheet. Do not stop sounding songs (seems the same always, by the way) during the 76-minute movie.It is is mounted? in an offensive manner, ná, good actors, roll Troma putting faces on the fly. Best of all is that it has 2 directors! History, has no, because nor storyline is neither good nor bad is bland and there is no joke.I think for the moment I can say, when they ask me what is the worst movie I've seen in my life, that this honor lies in "Mutantes en la Universidad"

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2920

Antoni Messa

Wolf Creek

muchocine

A wonder of terror that will delight all those who they love to eat the nails of pure nervousness. What take advantage! I, for if the flies, don't think tourism go to Australia..., at least until that forget this film.

Despite being an exemplary film in the horror film it is concerned, the Australian Wolf Creek reaches Spain with a couple of years too late. It translates Dante adventure experienced by three youths during a summer vacation in Australia. Two British girls and a young man from the country who, on Board of a second hand car, straightest in the most inhospitable places of the land of kangaroos with the intention of admiring the beauty of its atypical landscapes. But a stranger. out of darkness and midway through its route, Wolf Creek National Park, just decided to cut the planned touristic route clean.Wolf Creek is a clearly indebted to the massacre of Texas film made in Hooper and the first the hills have eyes. The arid and solo scene in which passes the action, and the ruinous and rusty scenery that unfolds the vicious and bloodthirsty character of Mick Taylor (almost, almost, for his brutality, a first cousin of the atrocious Leatherface), they are the main tools used by its director, Greg Mclean, to create an atmosphere so agonizing as unhealthy.Fear and insecurity which feels the trio of teenagers to the unknown, are sensations transmitted alike to the Viewer. He senses that something strong is about to take place, although unknown exactly what, how and when. The shaky camera sigilosidad, ambient cold that breathes and the negrísima darkness of the Australian night, part of the psychological and tense decorated with that rookie Mclean influence, subliminal way, on the bulk of the audience. And so, just when the movie enters bag in one of the episodes more agonizing and brutal of the genus, the public inevitably feels identified with the impotence and dread of some victims to them costs us absolutely nothing to guess their macabre future. Skin of chicken, cold sweats, and calambrazos in the backbone, we are.The routine way that begins the history? through a topical presentation of three young people and demonstrating some conscious effort to the tourist postalita of rigour-has nothing to do with the rest of the footage. Step by step, without haste, forgotten landscape and focuses only on the form. The entrance to this deep Australia, as described in Wolf Creek, is similar to a slower descent into hell. Nasty insinuations that loosen the two girls, the parishioners of a dirty bar in the middle of nowhere, serve mode of presentation (or preparatory) which then it will be the appearance on the scene of the Satan himself. A demon which, initially, will be shown to the newcomers as an Angel salvador and charming. A true film chocolate; Although a chillingly sinister and bitter chocolate. Reads a sign (both in the promotional poster and in the opening credits), the film is based on a true incident; a truthful that entrecomillaría personally, despite its chilling look real and the credibility that offer your images, seems to me as another cryptic trick to raise the restlessness of the spectator a few degrees more. Rather than a real event, bet on the fanciful reading the director and screenwriter done on the disappearances of a number of people in Australian land. Or, at least (and without falling into any spoiler), that is what lead me to think his four final notes and a cast on one of the protagonists in particular.No more: a marvel of terror that will delight all those who they love to eat the nails of pure nervousness. What take advantage! I, for if the flies, don't think go tourism to Australia., at least until I forget this film. And that the canguritos me hungry.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/169

Rafa Marin

Plan oculto

muchocine

Plot ingenious and fun with some depth charge that reveals the shortcomings of the system

It is good contestarios geniuses fall from time to time to the sands of blockbusters, inter alia because they often provide different and even personal points of view. Both are met in the last film by Spike Lee, hidden Plan (the original title, Inside Man, has a lot more bad grapes, a game of mirrors that against which only can play the title in Spanish), because since the first blueprints to see New York and its streets with a look and a light that had not seen before, and above the director does not hesitate strain in a witty and funny plot any depth charge that reveals the shortcomings of the system. It is a movie of bank robberies, of those that we have seen so many times and we have bored half of them, and yet here, despite the long footage, the Viewer does not have time or of even blinking. Lee moves the camera on his shoulder, nervous, when the false painters led by a masked man Clive Owen lían the taco in the Bank of Manhattan, and has time to create strokes of personality both in him as in his opponent (Denzel Washington, aging dignísimamente and waiting for his own Clint Eastwood) or in the enigmatic couple make up the cold negotiator (Jodie Foster) and the President of the Bank of yore (a raymondiano Christopher Plummer who was sorry) (that does not have the almost ninety years must have their character). Not happy with the nervousness of the situation, waiting, the panic of the hostages and the hieratismo of the hijackers, Lee jumps in a fast forward burned image of what happens after the assault and the release getting increase the mystery of the reason for the robbery and the personality and the actual number of the assailants (so these, very intelligently)(, they dress to the nearly 50 hostages in the same way as them). The film is, above all, a pure entertainment, almost the serious version of this little gem which is the jungle of glass, although without shots. Lee is able to go giving us clues, from the first scene, of what is happening, and however cheats us at all times, until the end, what the thieves (and himself) are brought in hands. Knowing that the Viewer often become part of the bad guys in this type of robbery (they should ask if not Cary Grant - well, he can not-, Robert Wagner, Robert Redford or gang of George Clooney), here also reinforces that empathy loading of moral reasons to Owen (or downloading to Plummer), albeit not until the end to see discovered his Robin Hood type bluff. Ultimately, Spike Lee cannot denounce, from fun, the origin of the money and much of psychosis post 11-S in the USA. Priceless the detention of the Sikh hostage and its confusion with an Arab, as priceless is the scene with the violent videogame the child teaches Clive Owen and the reaction. After more than two hours of film, one is still under wanting more. And a curious detail: is the first time that I see that receivable refers to all the musicians that they interpret the soundtrack.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4034

Sandavito

Pozos de ambición

muchocine

No fanfare. Nothing free.We are seeing real men, fighting themselves and the world.

We have to wait to see the latest film by Paul Thomas Anderson, who already bring us the wonder called Magnolia, as well as interesting Punch Drunk Love and Boogie Nights in Spanish theaters until February 15. On this occasion has been with Daniel Day-Lewis as unquestionable protagonist to speak to us, once again, the human miseries, a role which has earned the award from the Broadcast Film Critics Association Awards.There will be blood tells how Daniel Plainview is possessed by the idea of the competition, being the best, the richest, but to support others to do you shade. Search gold and silver converted in oil magnate, Plainview will be falling increasingly lower to achieve your goals no matter what or who has to trample.Following a more or less linear plot development, without large excesses or extremely portentous turns, the story takes place, as in the rest of tapes by Paul Thomas Anderson, using the characters as foundations, such as the main base and engine of the entire film. Weight falls on them and you know take it very well. Daniel Day-Lewis is a true American of the 19th and early 20th Centuries, hardened by dint of peak and Palau. It exudes rude and cold blood. Her accent and their movements are perfectly worked. In short, you see on screen is not Day-Lewis, but Plainview. Very in keeping with its name (plainview, in English, would direct view), progresses without artifice by history, making it clear what he wants and that nothing will stop him to achieve this. But there is always some obstacle, and in this case the obstacle is none other than a young man got his own sect, the third revelation, Prophet epitomized by Paul Dano. Dano, whose role better known to date was elder brother in little Miss Sunshine, he is surprisingly mature performance, knowing stand up to Day-Lewis without any problem, balancing the interpretative balance perfectly. Maybe that Paul Thomas Anderson has discovered a new Norton Edward with this film.The realization of the tape is, without packaging, calling history. Levels of long duration, for the most part, none of syncopated mounting, violence, when it appears, told with coldness exquisite, close and distant at a time, without recreating it but ignore her, as a necessary element more. Very studied frames and games with the internal contracampo in the moments of more privacy or in the light of a campfire. No fanfare. Nothing free. Here we are not seeing giant, with the wonderful James Dean suffering before our eyes by misunderstood. We are seeing real men, that could well be his grandparents, fighting themselves and the world.The rest of the elements support the development of the film perfectly and her highten. Photography Robert Elswit, his collaborator from Sydney (1996), even without being too spectacular, has grandiose moments, especially when playing with high contrast and low-light conditions. On the music of Johnny Greenwood he succeeds in creating an almost hypnotic atmosphere of tension, playing with minimalist movements occasionally, with very present cords which almost suffocate the percussion have base. Only there was a moment of the footage that seemed just right; the rest of the time, a real find.There will be blood is an essential event for those who enjoy watching movies with more than just shooting and explosions, film that has something to tell, a film in which each element, each character, works with the accuracy of a machine of watchmaking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/10

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

May

muchocine

May you be my friend?

"May, want to be my friend?" is one of those movies that remind us that terror not always bears claws of steel in a hand or a mask on the face. Terror and madness are much more close to us the reality of our peaceful and even sometimes boring monotony. It may operates under the method: the beast sleeps within us. In each of us there is a possible psychopath and our neighbour of the second can hide a dark past or a double life. So, Lucky McKee, us it is effectively a story allegedly daily (However, hooked from the beginning) about a young man very similar to those many others that they swarm our around. The Raritan for the class, the shy girl from the grocery store, this strange sister of our friend, our prima of the people. This is why we boarded a commuter train, not a high-speed train with views to reruns of "The fresh Prince of Bell Air" and adolescents through and scenes unbearable with hormones surplus and deficit of neurons. In this train we are with well drawn characters and flesh and blood. Characters worked, attractive and even very daring. (The companion of May in the vet where he works has no waste) All of them revolve around the character of May, played with a lot of love and talent by Angela Bettis that succeeds in creating a character that shows compelling and original. The plot is as I say very interesting and surprising to a pace that breaks our expectations but that never disappoints us. The transformation that suffers from May and the hopeless desencadenación to a daunting destination, happens due to a range of features and very well explained and sound recognizable events that shape and mature the true face of terror.This is a film that takes runout to start before you begin where almost all the others of its kind, to then finish also well beyond where no other dare. Once Todd Solondz, known for achieving go too far with their jumps and shying away from the usual genres to invent his own, gave us "Welcome to the doll's House" (1996), (previous film to its acid and brilliant "Happyness" (1998) which has a lot to do with this.) In it, Mr Solondz, he addressed so raw and valiant, the drama of a girl ugly and traumatized, faced with the more stark reality. The biggest difference between them is, of course, that was not a horror film. Well, and to the point, do not expect conventional scenes, nor cats that are determined to lose, or efectistas sustitos, nor special effects because they do not need. This is a low-budget production but also it not noticeable. And he is not noticed, because it has a much more than correct picture, a heady, agonizing atmosphere an intelligent Assembly and a very real, and for this end, frighteningly real.This is a movie worth (of notable high for whom you write now) which is that friends, if "Amelie" had been a film of terror rather than a magical tale, that sweet francesita were no doubt called "May". And the magic, black magic, of course, very black.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/73

Tito Chinchan

Underworld evolution

muchocine

Nothing to do with the ancient struggle between werewolves and vampires

Not be if I have already said this, but have to be something I'll stick with vampires, who the werewolves have neither glamour nor na na. Vampires, where it will stop are uncouth and rude, much better.The film is about a vampire who has killed a great vampire and now all the other vampires the Chase to kill her. She is not alone, since there is a hybrid licántropo is beside her (although it does more to annoy, but it is). On the other hand it is the primordial vampire, who has mutated and now has wings and very nasty. And he is dedicated to pursuing these two to get some stuff. And in addition get a man who does not understand that he paints the end, who runs an organization that have weapons that kill much (in theory, which are then cow poop). Well, nothing to do with the ancient between werewolves and vampires fight, as they say in advertising.On the one hand we have large doses of special effects, with transformations of humano-licántropo and humano-vampiro which are really worth. Action are curradas and are quite brutal. But the subject of the script weakens enough. Yo is that these films which can not open a door because they need some ancient keys, since the invention of dynamite, seems total nonsense. It is also pretty long, but do not understand why, given that few things happen. Basically, nothing, that they fight and fight. And by the way, the werewolves have become mere little who die with staring them. Ah, I forgot, is the parallel story of the birth of vampires, that a film could be made only of that fine. Habemus prequel?To sum up, or going to the cinema to get hand into the moments that do not kill or sofa and blanket when you convaleces of a disease and not want to think.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/639

Rafa Ferrer

Gracias por fumar

muchocine

A firm opinion about the tobacco industry criticizes can disrespect, but any viewer can understand the complexities which the director has faced.

Sad is that the work of Jason Reitman (not confused with Ivan) has not taken place for brand new in our country before this tasteless work debut "Thank you for smoking". His short films "Uncle Sam" and "In God we trust" already made him famous in various festivals by its sharp acid humor and exaggerated critical sense.To "Thank you for smoking" a firm opinion about the tobacco industry criticizes can disrespect, but any viewer can understand the complexities to which the director has faced, although my taste just deepen the wound.In the film it is much discussed, refers to endless, are given all possible laps to the issues raised in some moments comes to the spectator, blame, bore a narrative plot well linked and a wonderful group of actors in State of grace, beautifully directed toward the more sarcastic side of human beings.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1431

Francisco Bellón

Días de cine

muchocine

Days of the cinema is one of the worst Spanish films of recent years, which spare you vulgarity and missing above all dignity

One of the greatest burdens suffered by art and Spanish culture in the 20th century has been the Franco dictatorship and its censorship. And as any art, the film was one of the main victims of this ballast. Not only because they tighten the freedom and creativity of our filmmakers, such as Bardem and Berlanga, but by the imposition of a kind of cinema that ex post has already called "the españoladas". Do the films of the prodigies as Joselito or Marisol, the folkloric, Paco Martínez Soria, Gracita Morales? and a long list of others have done much harm to the health of our film. During the transition came a phase opposite to the previous with the arrival of freedom, but also harmful to the Spanish cinema, "uncover", and at that time situated David Serrano new locked days of cinema. after the success of football days, Serrano offers us a story telling the difficulties of Frederick (Alberto San Juan) to shoot his first movie as a director. Silvia count (Nathalie Poza) and his producer José María Culebras (Miguel Rellán), this project is the last chance to return to the cinema, or bid at least him farewell with dignity. David Serrano raises his new job as a tribute in a tone of comedy to the directors of that time, true heroes of our cinematography, who fought against everything and everyone in order to carry out his work. The initial idea is good, but Serrano their development fails him, and committed a serious sin, not taking seriously what counts. The tape is intended to cover both the comedy incongruous as the pure human drama, and you know the saying. If that were the worst of the evils of days of the cinema, viewers still could feel fortunate, but unfortunately it isn't. The script, in which he has participated Alberto San Juan, is nothing more than a succession of absurdities, to which worse, while the characters are just puppets empty, without depth or development. The comic elements of the film are nothing more than crude humor, easy jokes, absurd situations coming to provoke the embarrassment, and that leave the works of Spain uncover at summits of the intelligent comedy. The dramatic moments are to go to cry bitterly, because it does not have intensity or convey the most basic of emotions. Semenjante panorama, little or nothing can be done actors, although comforting return to Michael Byrne. days of cinema screens is one of the worst Spanish films of recent years, which spare you vulgarity and missing above all dignity. As a comedy, it doesn't not shred of grace, and as human and social drama, is laughable. Let us hope that from this good idea carried a tape that take seriously the story telling, and to do so with what has lacked to days of the cinema, dignity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3066

Tito Chinchan

Disturbia

muchocine

Film about a kid who spies on his neighbors and in addition to discover solid which is the neighboring believes discover a murderer. Bread seeds and tostadito freshly brewed honey with a filling of lettuce without salt. The beginning and end, the rest roll.

Disturbia, disturbia, of what sounds like this movie? Course of Hitchcock's rear window, although the resemblance is just plot. Given that as said the master, can not make movies (or go, what is I?) or with animals or with children. That is why did not know that in a future late adolescents taken screens to tell us stories of jumping pheromones with binoculars.The film is about a boy who loses his father and past a year not has succeeded in overcoming it. For reasons that are beside the point, put an AB such that is the futuristic movies explode and kill the prisoner, but that in this case no more than tell the police. Given that his mother forbids him any fun (the non zambomba have no news), is engaged in spying on the neighbors, and discover things "distubiantes" (like rebuena which is nearby).This is like when you take an ice cream with hot chocolate above, or rather, as when you put it a few green beans with potatoes. That is, we have a mixture of rhythms that kill me. It begins explosive, then he sleeps to wake us up at the end with a good ending. But of course, you've eaten the hot chocolate, and the stock of ice cream that is already is not the same. For not to mention that apart from beans to only eat the potatoes. The intrigue is not bad, but we have that teenage roll did not finish like me (except that is despeloten, of course).In short, film about a kid who spies on neighbors and, in addition to discover solid which is the neighboring believes discover a murderer. Bread seeds and tostadito freshly brewed honey with a filling of lettuce without salt. The beginning and end, the rest roll.I was going to put it better, but the girl told me that it was a roll. I have less personality than a sweet potato.Besitos.P.D: I have more hunger dog of the Sharpener, who ate the Sparks to eat something hot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2267

JLO

El imperio del fuego

muchocine

Movie failed on several points: it is not entertaining despite being the genre of action, without any political message and not despair never transmits no dramatic tension necessary.

To see the poster of the film with the Dragon advance flying over and threatening an entire city in flames, I entusiasmé and I said: at least guaranteed fun! But I failed by far the palpitation. Movie failed on several points: is not entertaining despite being the genre of action, without any political or perhaps no message - an Anglo-American Alliance is nothing new in these moments - and despite being set in a medieval apocalyptic future, not transmitted never despair nor necessary dramatic tension.Yes the battles between humans and dragons are achieved but they are too limited to support the film (and noblesse oblige, the animal model is the same Dragon heart but without the voice of Connery).Filmed entirely in Ireland (special country to search for locations of castles), tells the almost disappearance of the human race at the hands of these gigantic and fearsome bugs mythological being the only hope a handful of men without armament weight and the fight against hunger and the elapsed time. Chata, with stereotypical characters (the good is sooo good and the bad in the end becomes), without humor except a nice theatrical parody of Star Wars, with correct performances especially in the harmless Matthew Mc Conaughey (unrecognizable with its new look like Conan) and the secondary Christian Bale (American Psycho, Batman Begins). The film starts promising in its initial half-hour and then begins to fade, reaching his absence at the bottom and becoming a hybrid between adventure and suspense coming to yawning. The main fault which can be reproached to a director and his work, is the not to translate in short nothing of what was proposed, seen the poor results.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/831

Dragon negro

El ilusionista

muchocine

The film as his best virtue has an effective atmosphere and above all an actorazo is Paul Giamatti which fails to nobody overshadow him. Entertaining proposed and recommended seeing.

The custom in Hollywood for films with similar themes in pairs, such as donuts or the petitsuise is known, the topic in question this time is that of the Magi of the 19th century. The first news that were were the film The Prestige, that done Christopher Nolan, but before this the magician of Neil Burger.El has reached us film recreates the life of Eisenheim, child fond of magic that small was forced to flee due to his impossible friendship and love with Princess Sophie. But Eisenheim again years later become already an exceptional Mage and a master of illusion with a show that quickly become one of the bless of the city, a 19th century Vienna, and will run the voice over the supernatural talent of the magician. Both called the attention until the heir, Leopold, attend one of his duties accompanied by his fiancée, the Princess Sophie. After meeting the wizard and the Princess will resurface this latent love between the two.The film has an effective atmosphere as your best virtue and above all an actorazo is Paul Giamatti which fails to nobody overshadow him portraying the police on the side of the burguesia investigated to clarify the dirt of the magician and his interest by the Princess. Edwar Norton, despite being one of the best young actors today, you note tense and not stand against a Giamatti in State of grace, as almost everything what makes this man lately. The magician tricks surprised by being an overwhelming simplicity at the same time that incredible and show that it doesn't show a great magic show to be convincing as a wizard, in that the film is a success.But the movie fails in a script that tries to surprise and that really don't get, is there are things that are already very views and we are already very tanned in this film. Despite this it is an entertaining proposed and recommended to see, but certainly will be back as soon as we can see The Prestige and compare both.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2405

Tito Chinchan

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

Film animation very entertaining on a green bug fat and rude, but big heart. For all ages, although safe more Sin her they measured better than elders. Recommended.

Shrek was a blow of fresh air in the panorama of animation, as a counterpoint to certain lifestyle to create films. A Disney idea of showing drawings animated, focused towards children and the elderly, with jokes for everyone. It was a great hit, of course. This third installment follows as the rest of the series, with the same sense of humor, but with the handicap of the loss of freshness.The film is about a fat and green ogre who has to make himself King of very, very far, given that his father-in-law (a frog) dies. As it does, decides to go looking for Arthur, the next in the line of succession. To all this, Fiona, his wife, is pregnant, causing her a great anxiety. To finish messing, the previous suitor, returns with an army of waste to reconquer the Kingdom.Well, let's see. The movie is funny and entertaining. We can compare it with the previous, but does not seem quite fair. What fault does this good was the first delivery? I personally you made less more tidbits from the previous ones, as the OGRE burping (I'm fan), but certainly not worthy. It is very nice, with great moments and a script without many pretensions, but well spun. There are hilarious moments, some demented, and one incomprehensible of songs that made me clench the teeth of horror. Well, say that it was a critique of the animated musicals so it can fit in my young mind.In short, film animation very entertaining on a green bug fat and rude, but big heart. For all ages, although safe more Sin her they measured better than elders. Recomendable.Besitos.P.D: The dwarf that give you to Fiona is nailed to Rajoy.P.D.2: that you have safe children that you can enjoy all the secretillos that hides the movie (which you will see hundreds of times, obviously).P.D.3: Merlin has a very good point.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3907

Plissken

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Simplistic and Manichaean, vision half way between the palomitera súperproducción and the film with message, one of the classics of science fiction of the last century.

Adapt: Modify a work of scientific, literary, musical, etc., so that it can be disseminated among public other than that which it was intended or give a different form of the original.Abiding by the meaning of the SAR, we could say that 'I am legend' of Francis Lawrence meets at least one of the requirements to be considered an adaptation of the superb novel by Richard Matheson. But a this Alfred Hitchcock, an expert in adaptations, came to say, more or less, that "the secret of the adaptation is to understand the main idea and ignore the rest". If we ignore to last it, 'I am legend' is nothing more than a bland (and neat, that Yes) remake of 'The last man alive', the most macarrada of Boris Sagal and Charlton Heston. Because falls into the same tic than the previous version: forget about why (and for what) Richard Matheson wrote the original.On this occasion, Robert Neville (a more than acceptable Will Smith) is a military virologist who happens to be the only survivor to a devastating plague that destroys 90% of the world's population and turn the rest into inhuman predators with alopecia problems and extreme sensitivity to ultraviolet rays. Their unique vital impulses are finding a cure for the virus, contact with other possible survivors and see an entire video store in alphabetical order. Until one day.Francis Lawrence has checked a harmless blockbuster to the greater glory of Will Smith, but post-apocalyptic line with the Omega Man of Sagal and introducing to shoehorn a strong element religious in the last section of the film. In addition, turn violent but rational vampires from the original of Matheson in a mixture of bloodsuckers, zombie and skinhead who come you to the hair to get another text messages on racism and xenophobia. Curious point this: while in the original book the protagonist goes to be monsters Hunter hunted monster in this 'I am legend' not only does not change their point of view, they allowed the luxury of marking a speech against racism and violence after spending three years, three, pounding the new species to "cure". Poor and pacifist military, acribillando "bugs" with his rifle's telescopic sight.And is that the script have filling Mark Protosevich and Akiva Goldsman presents several minor inconsistencies (SPOILER: If Manhattan was isolated from the rest of the country, is how come Anna and his son with his brand-new SUV?), but your greatest sin is to be more a variation to an adaptation: empties the original, grab the shell and adds what fits best at this time. Emptying is such that until the title loses its sense, resorting to a shameful final tirade in off to try to fix it.On the other hand, the technical Bill for the product is quite good, with a successful photography Andrew Lesnie and a notable production of Naomi Shohan design. The digital effects are more questionable, shabby and very linear design of creatures (even the orcs of Moria were more varied).In short, we will never know how this project would have been with Arnie Schwarzenegger to the head. We have this simplistic and Manichaean, vision half way between the palomitera súperproducción and the film with message, one of the classics of science fiction of the last century. Seen, they could have changed the title. A 4.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3462

Oscar Martínez

La habitacion de Fermat

muchocine

The room of Fermat is a movie with very good intentions but whose end result fails to be entirely satisfactory, although neither is an insult to our intelligence or anything.

After having gone through the Sitges Festival, finally reached our screens room Fermat, Opera prima of the tandem formed by Luis Piedrahita and Rodrigo Sopeña, starring Alejo Sauras and Elena Ballesteros, Santi Millán, Lluís Homar and Federico Luppi.En she, four mathematicians are invited by a such Fermat to a meeting in which he challenges them to decipher the more complex mathematical problem ever conceived. Dam of curiosity, the four scholars will be brought to an abandoned barn, in whose interior you will find with Fermat, who before exposing his conundrum must leave in haste in direction to the hospital where his daughter is entered. Since then, the four guests will begin to receive mathematical problems through a PDA with a minute of time to solve them. If take longer, the walls of the room in which they are locked will begin to wane to crush them.I have read reviews and quite harsh opinions about Fermat's room and, the truth, nor do I believe it for both: while it is not no genius, nor much less, must be recognized his wit, in which we could consider as a mixture of films such as Cube or even Saw with an atmosphere to the Cluedo, A corpse to desserts, or what is the same, to as Agatha Christie.En first of all, applies to Fermat's room is set in a very dynamic way, unpretentious, with a pace that, despite not become hectic or anything, we do catalog as enjoyable. Secondly, I think is quite right that their creators have opted for expose simple mathematical problems because, on the one hand, the approach of some intractable puzzles would have not facilitated the complicity of a spectator which seeks to resolve them and, on the other hand, its simplicity plays against the own knowledge of the characters, located in a far superior to these puzzles intellectual ladder.On the contrary, one must recognize that the outcome of Fermat's room, despite not reaching to be frustrating, yes that can detract from the rest of the film, in a succession of findings and allegations whose cabos are tying up at a rate of exponential to the final conclusion; on the other hand, one of the biggest sins of the film is the wastage of the actors, or rather, its lines of dialogue, with which none of them seems to believe his paper, and far from evoke the profile of a gifted for the figures. And it is that the characters of Fermat's room could spend anything less Eminences, because at no time we awarded for game play with a hint of genius or with an inspiring look, so its credibility is non-existent for the Viewer. To that, add a couple of jokes rather out of place that pesard and be funny some of them, do not belong in a theoretical frame of suspense.So, in short, the room of Fermat is a movie with very good intentions but whose outcome does not become entirely satisfactory, although neither is an insult to our intelligence or anything.As they would say some, in worst places we toreado.I am a 5'5 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/955

Txapulin

Brick

muchocine

We must save the small obstacle of the use of a narrative structure of film noir already in disuse that, addition, does not fit with the scenario of secondary of the film school, but at the same time, this is his greatest achievement and originality: return us the memory of the great films of the 1940s and 1950s.

We have a movie in puzzling even for those who are accustomed to seeing film noir classic. It is not difficult to imagine a lone private detective, no family and few friends, or a femme fatale self-destructive. These characters are normal in an atmosphere of film in black and white of the 1940s. But when they set us the history at a secondary school, with issues of drugs, murder and revenge, as it bewilders. It is hard to believe how the class nerd gets to investigate a murky issue in which his ex-girlfriend has gotten with the bad of the class. Clear that her could have explained to us as an episode of Beverly Hills, 90210, but if we have a history of film noir and a few characters in film noir, and above, an homage to the classic film noir, we do because we have to tell the tale as if film noir, although we are in the environment of a secondary school. The narrative point of view also is very classic, we know exactly what he knows the main character, and that is why, at the beginning we do not understand anything, then the plot is somewhat complex, but the puzzle is solved masterfully and everything fits, especially those hidden motivations of the characters to guess to understand them.To highlight the script, performances and the beauty of Nora Zehetner, photography and the use of so many details (hear the synchronized sound of footprints in a Chase just prior to our protagonist remove shoes or insistent comparison of lyrics between the post-up our protagonist receives) that invite a review to discover what else offers this film.Total, that we must save the small obstacle of the use of a narrative structure in disuse that, moreover, does not fit with the scenario of the film, but that, in turn, that is his greatest achievement and originality: return us the memory of the great films of the 1940s and 1950s.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4222

Natalia Eseverri

Mortadelo y Filemón: Misión Salvar la Tierra

muchocine

A compendium of topicazos bulk that does not match the quality of the comics, nor is a well-deserved tribute to the author of these characters that have pleasantly marked many childhoods, like mine.

There is impossible to adapt things in the film or that the result is no more satisfactory. With the first installment of Mortadelo y Filemón, Javier Fesser managed to surprise me, traslandando this magical universe of endearing comic, who managed to hypnotize me in childhood, thanks to a good story well told and who managed to see those shots of comic, those characters that made me both laugh. Ultimately, he managed to see the comic strip across the screen.In this case, there is a principle in the indent bug history not hooked from the beginning and if above, what you aderezas with topicazos as easy jokes, sayings, meter andalusianism pure and simple because if and also exaggerated, and a question from when Ophelia originally was Galician?.The case is that during most of the footage, one is bored of not seeing anything interesting that surprised him, as he always did the comics of Ibáñez, and saved some extemely that you awaken a slight smile that serves to not sleep you in the armchair.And I prefer not to mention the new mort, because it hardly has any prominence and who has, nor is that it would be worthwhile. Pepe Viyuela line only lacked the gag of the ladder that memory of girl in which he got the head in the staircase and the sketch was trying to take it out, without success. And for me, only save Janfri Coronado, which makes effect, Mauritius Venacio, the Super, and Emilio Gavira Rompetechos, because they are the only ones that retain the essence of the first film and that do not fall in exaggerations with their characters.Anyway, seeing the outcome of this second part, I hope that not passes them through the head, a third, because now, in truth, they would end up with the Earth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3711

Tito Chinchan

La Novia Cadaver

muchocine

Although it is not the style of film that is often seen in these parts, I have to say that it is a very good movie and every time I like more the animation. Highly recommended, although perhaps for children is somewhat harsh.

It must be acknowledged that the title of the film coincides fully with it, does not leave an iota. And I can't think of more introductory nonsense.The film is a boy son of a family of newly rich to marry a girl of noble family without a penny. Of course, these two are unknown, although as soon as they are, remain fond (slightly) and the wedding does not seem too bad. By own clumsiness of the boy, this House with a corpse, causing some headaches to everyone. And it is that you have to see how badly it bury people.The type of drawings used Tum Burton in this film I do not end like. It goes without saying that they are real good, but used some colors and some sketches too dark, too dark, too dead. Perhaps that what I am not convinced it is the argument, but the drawings I do not end call. The love story that is seen in the film is quite moralistic, but I have to say that I really liked. The principle, that come to be the first 50 minutes, I did not finish like. But the final half-hour is sublime, especially the last 10, which I greatly enternecieron ('ll be pregnant?). And cerradito that remains throughout the script, without failures anywhere or anything of anything. I liked.In short, although it is not the style of film that is often seen in these parts, I have to say that it is a very good movie and that each time I like more the animation. Highly recommended, although perhaps for children is somewhat harsh.Besitos.P.D: The bride dropped the eye from time to time and get a very funny worm. Mola.P.D.2: Both parents are very well characterized.P.D.3: And the cosas who sings from time to time are not bad. "Do the pulse?" "Sobrevalorado" je, je.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1912

Oscar Cantero

Premonition (Siete días)

muchocine

Another boring production midway between the drama of desktop, fantastic comedy and drama of three to the fourth.

The career of Sandra Bullock years ago, quite a few already, that he entered into a spin. It is not to have less talent than most of their peers. In fact, it is better actress than many of those who are considered to be sacred cows, even if it means not too. The issue could be due to the unfortunate choice of his roles, always aimed at the recovery of the tug lost box office, rather than to claim as a successful actress, without success, to be.Premonition is located halfway between the drama of desktop, fantastic comedy and suspense of three to the fourth.Grosso modo, the story focuses on the existence of a young woman who leads the ideal life in the American, with her own garden cottage, a hubby Cutie and two cherubs that fill your home with joy. Suddenly, he receives a call that announces the death of her husband; upon waking the next morning finds him back to his side, but soon happen the same time again. After an initial state of confusion, he realizes the days pass messy. And that is all. The film suffers from a lack of brutal rhythm, an excessive monotony and a serious lack of narrative resources, which could be attributed to the little cinematic experience of its director, Menna Yapo (which by the way is German although the name seems not) in a princpio. But once he visiona together, comes to the conclusion that this grotesque has many culprits as intervening there in the different stages of filming, editing and post production. When there is a film with the sole purpose of entertaining, the least can ask you is to do. If not, has no reason to exist.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2733

Iñaki Bilbao

Caótica Ana

muchocine

Interesting but not fully convincing work by Julio Medem.

Curious and interesting work by Julio Medem, which continues with their particular world where unites past, present and future, reality, dreamy scenes, dreams, fantasies, painful realities and loves catalysts, this full of symbols and metaphors. To begin my comment I have to say that I liked and entertained, mention of excited in a couple of scenes. Only a couple, it is true. And if you start saying this is because I then also say that not me has convencido.del all.This, without doubt, is for the particular way of telling by Medem, that if well in "Red squirrel" and "Sex and Lucia" it was so prodigious, in "Caótica Ana", sometimes, tends to the mental dispersion and to flourish too much, the free narrative will.Thus, mingle excellent scenes, such as the various deaths of Ana in their past lives and the reunion and dance with her father, with others that must accept because Yes, as the appearance of Ana in the boat of the father of her best friend. A moment shown magical way, but without greater logical sense. As I say, you must accept, but there is no doubt that it is very strange and why, perhaps unacceptable for the more conventional Viewer.Maybe the tape is without doubt, the printed strength in images, with a masterful prologue, a magnificent use of music and a superb work of mounting. In its negative side, in addition to the already above, some facts that do not contribute too much to the plot.However I her advocate because I believe that dramatic intensity as well as the pace is of less to more. For this reason, and seeing the epilogue of the story, I think that the taste is more than acceptable when not good (in my case). However, this film is the clear example of tape which, if not you enter from the outset in the history and accept the narrative of its author, disconnect and let you either indifferent or worse still, very disappointed.So, I think honestly the final grade her must place more than ever, the own Viewer.To my have worked me effectively holds Medem best job, but I think it is a very estimable movie I guess will be revalued over time.What I absolutely disagree is in the comments pointing to that this film does not acknowledge just nothing of the previous Medem. Man, I think Yes! The items listed are common in all of his works. What might change (think that not too) is the way to expose them.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3426

Ana Belén Pacheco

Once

muchocine

Spielberg: "A little movie called Once gave me enough inspiration to last the rest of the year ”, if he feels well I am not going to be who take you the opposite."

Eleven, which has nothing to do with the number that goes behind the ten if not with its English meaning translatable as 'once' and with good reason because films like this are only "once each long", is a perlite. To see the tape reminded me the dogma films well done. It is a musical in the broad sense of the word (nothing to do with the media and the presumption of dancing in the dark) but a different and street music where musicians assail the action with tremendous melodic pieces. It cannot be a great musical because the grace of the film is the collected environment and intimate, actually harmony Gets a small, delicate, round film being delicious band sound is truly perfect and absolutely touching. "Falling Slowly", "If You Want Me" or the funny songs performed on the bus are musical jewels to adorn a tale of love and sincere, exciting and poignant rapport. Their actors are truly unknown and have previously been musicians in the streets and with a style of singer-songwriter very risky. The strength of the film cement in the interpretations of its protagonists the Irish Glen Hansard (professional musician and frontman of the band The Frames) and the Czech Markéta Irglová, a young instrumentalist of nineteen years. Both acores amateur but with a broad background and perfect for this old-fashioned love story. Guy (marked as well in the credits while she appears as a Girl and curiously using their own names real during the plot) plays on the streets of Dublin, in the bustling Crafton Street entertaining the Irish and tourists in the main pedestrian street in the Irish capital. His passion for the music makes them combine their afternoon playing with the family business and keep dreaming with a professional pitch until he meets a foreign girl with which begins a friendship based on their mutual love for music and to help you turn your dream into reality. No doubt with a simple argument get a really beautiful effect by the incredible work of John Carney, director and writer with some success television in Ireland but unknown in the rest of the world at least so far but that must keep track after this eleven, United States has already been a resounding success, thanks in part to the inspiring words of Spielberg: "A little movie called Once gave me enough inspiration to last the rest of the year", if he feels well I am not going to be who take you the opposite.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/150

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Azuloscurocasinegro

muchocine

Daniel gets to mark his style, because he is faithful to its principles, its past as a short film maker, his philosophy of director

After little more than two weeks, a film as "dark blue almost black", that comes brand new in style with three Biznagas at the festival of Málaga, can not see in any of the two multiplexes of San Cugat del Valles, and already only is projected at four cinemas in the city of Barcelona, reflects perfectly the situation of our national cinema.I wonder, with despair, the luck that you bring to these other Spanish were not rewarded or not even released works in Málaga. The film does not reach the public and dies, inevitably, without an engaged and effective industry protected legally, independent and with a real power of distribution. This disaster, this clear and permanent crisis of Spanish cinema, has nothing to do, as much that so want us to sell, with the problems of piracy on the Internet. It is Internet, precisely and in this case, from where is being achieved, in large part, create a well-deserved word of mouth about this movie that is prompting many people to go to the cinema.Although, in fact, I never intend to be objective, I would be also impossible to be writing about this opera prima by Daniel Sánchez Arévalo. In my case, I know Daniel shorts and also know that to him. The film, however, enjoy if one is made, no doubt, to the great public. That is why the greatest concern of Daniel is that his first feature goes unnoticed for the vast majority. We speak does too in Salamanca, Daniel was safe, quiet, knowing that it has managed to create an honest and quality piece. That it has fulfilled more than their own expectations as director, intelligent author effective and intuitive and sensitive Viewer. But it is precisely why, Daniel is not shown outside at all to the almost black dark blue picture of our cinema.The plot of the film begins where ends one of his latest short films, his Super and acclaimed "Fisica II". Rescues the characters here to draw a simple story, but emotional and portrayed with astonishing dexterity. Skill in the visual, to mark a style, but without empachar. To narrate the visual language and separate the characters when they need it, join them when they should be together, to suggest and recreate with small symbolisms and winks. Skill in a mise en scene right and some sober and real performances with entertaining and intelligent dialogues. Because we know that make people laugh in dramatic situations is never an easy task.Another deadly Pirouette is the achieve mix social realism with the commercial genre. Know the topic social lightening just enough drama and not leaving already so trite and reviled style camera in hand, keeping the decision to leave the camera on the tripod or the dolly. And in addition, Daniel manages to mark his style, because he is faithful to its principles, its past as a short film maker, his philosophy of director who believes in the great importance of the screenplay and the acting direction. Who creates from the respect and humility and knows and manages to convey to the viewer their own enthusiasm for history that recreates. And that, is already more than half step to paradise.And as there is also some but in the film, to say that obvious academicism of the author, and the undeniable faith in dramatic structures, in the formulas of genre and script rules, take away from the story space for the surprise. History is always quite predictable. In addition, to keep the pulse so much and so successful Pirouette, some moments end up show is also unlikely and little credible. However, is everything so pampered and told with so much respect, sensitivity and enthusiasm, this hinders not for nothing a brilliant and talented opera prima you know good cinema and managed challenge.Finish pointing only two things, on the one hand to predict the obvious, a hopeful future for Daniel Sánchez Arévalo, and on the other, make you a very clear message: will not regret. Go see her!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3320

Patri

Zodiac

muchocine

The film immerses us in research resulting in that the end is so frustrating for the Viewer as to the protagonists of the story.

David Fincher is known for having directed two films which are already two modern classics: Seven and the Club of the fight, therefore everytime he directed a new film is expected much of him.Zodiac falls short of expectations, but I do not think that it will become a classic, but is a quality film, you can enjoy seeing it and when it just leaves the feeling of seeing good cinema, something that today is not abundant.Contrary to what is given to understand in the promotion of the film, the role does not focus on the character of Jake Gyllenhaal, but that is it split between three characters who evolve throughout the film.A police officer, a journalist and a cartoonist, have in common an obsession by the murderer of the Zodiac that causes a devastating effect on their lives. Initially continue the investigation of the police, but towards the middle of the film the two first characters "retire" to make way for the cartoonist, who takes the reins of the history, making a deep and thorough investigation into the murders of the Zodiac on the pretext of writing a book about it, then indeed if he came to write, and precisely this work is based on the film.Despite being a full of details research at any time we lose between tangled web of names that occur, unlike the film immerses us in research resulting in that the end is so frustrating for the Viewer as to the protagonists of the story.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3930

Estesoyo

La brújula dorada

muchocine

The plot is so cut that it can be summarized in: some bad very bad kidnap children to remove their pets and a girl with a good very good release them. Ah! There are a few bears that fight and at the end wins the good bear.

An adaptation of the book by Philip Pullman, northern lights, for American children. Hollywood producers are still looking for another bombing type 'The Lord of the Rings', but given the results, they will have to keep trying. Here they adapt, possibly the best story of the trilogy with quite painful results. Another missed opportunity to make a good fantasy film.The movie at the end was not to both. It was prepared with food, drink and you sweets for more than two hours and they stayed in a few hour and three quarters. And despite everything made me long the this monstrosity. And I say this monstrosity, because it's combining familiar faces, with static effects (decorated) and any match of animals made by computer. Damn, if Shrek have more dynamism than this crap. If you've already seen the trailer you've seen it all.Because the dialog boxes are not wasted. They have eliminated any political or religious reference (which is not that there were many.) but try to explain the story to everyone, so we have a lot of dialog boxes without sense, that they bored children and become jerks for adults. For example, in a moment of maximum tensíon (do?) my daughter was trying to see the color of the gominola which was eating. Because if children not interested in adults less.The plot is so cut that it can be summarized in: some bad very bad kidnap children to remove their pets and a girl with a good very good release them. Ah! There are a few bears that fight and at the end wins the good bear. They promise continued. Fear gives me.The actors I can say, if that better si el que mejor trabaja it works is the bear made by computer. Special mention for Nicole Kidman, if still doing things with his body will has end get the Mummy, more and more aseptica and without personality. Now we do not know if it is her or his wax statue. Embalming also could capture its beauty and leave it unchanged forever. Damn, she was red-haired and with freckles, and now is blonde and has completely white skin. and we laughed Michael Jackson.Dirige Chris Weitz with a script that has made himself. So it is completely responsible for the crappy. So far, he had devoted to production and to address any bland comedy. This work is great, but as it seems that him, pays then okay, uncle.By the way, it has been called the Golden Compass, because apparently, the name of the northern lights was caught by another film from years ago and not got the permission to use it. So much that it gives, I suppose as well in the future may be more faithful to the novel version.This endeavour of making films for children makes me weary. If the history is not for children, what infantilize her? Don't you realize that the success of the Lord of the rings is minimally respect if not the at least the concept novel? Soon will see up to the version of the Kamasutra.La nursery is a very bad thing, and that is for children does not justify do care so little work. For this reason and destroy a great novel, deserves one of the first zeros of the year.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3925

Francisco Bellón

El Prado de las Estrellas

muchocine

Obviously the Prado of the stars is not or by far one of the most successful works of Mario Camus, but continues to be a pleasant and interesting proposal see.

Some people think that there are times in which seems the best you can do a director after making a masterpiece retire to avoid comparisons, or even ridicule. Without doubt, the hive and the Holy Innocents are two of the largest Spanish films of all time, and to Mario Camus it must represent a great responsibility trying to match them.El Prado of the stars, Cantabrian filmmaker returns to the film after five years, and does so with a very personal film shot in his own land. It's a very choral story, mixing the dreams and hopes of youth, love, loneliness or speculation. The story is populated by some characters have in common try to go forward as best as possible, either looking for achieving their dreams or helping others to achieve them. The start of the film is something heavy, and the viewer takes in adapted forms of Camus, takes to enter fully into the fabric. The script has ups and downs, there is some sub-plots and diffuse characters (as that of Antonio de la Torre and Marián Aguilera), that distract without contributing anything to the set of the film. The scenes of cycling are very well achieved, and passed a great credibility and verisimilitude. A few solid players are those who finish contribute to the film the necessary consistency, although it is true that Oscar Abbot and Marián Aguilera them is still something green.Obviously the Prado of the stars is not or by far one of the most successful works of Mario Camus, but continues to be a pleasant and interesting proposal see. Hopefully this good premiere of Spanish cinema in 2008 (although entered in the Goya last year) is a positive omen for the rest of the season.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4214

Rafa Ferrer

Juno

muchocine

The independent film back in luck, sensational work of direction in a history of those who like both with final moral.

The firm intention to be something more serious in terms of my viewing of film, and something more demanding, that does not mean that continue not watching cinema commercial (palomitero) which I like to see and then criticize, but try also to somehow my taste (and yours) towards some kind of movies that I've done this year (of which still carry few days), otherwise, would go completely unnoticed.This is the case of Juno, an independent film has not gone unnoticed, it has raised a whopping $70,862,478, and is that you know that in the States all the Indie movie fan aesthetics (we know what makes the Fox Division: Fox Searchlight Pictures) is always to the liking of the "americanitos of a foot" (I like calling my them), and although premiered December 5, (in Spain its premiere scheduled for early February) and has an excellent cast, where we have the jovencisima Ellen Page (a revelation that we have seen in "Hard Candy" and "X-Men 3), seconded by Michael Cera (of the best of"Supersalidos"), Jason Bateman (the" mutant""Mr Magorium") and Jennifer Garner ("Alias"series)(, "Elektra".), in addition to the remarkable direction from Jason Reitman, the son of the myth of the 80's Ivan Reitman, amazed to own and strangers with "Thank you for not smoking", has made USA an excellent taste, besides a few nominations to the Academy Awards.The beginning of the film reminds me much other films of the same court, go no further that crappy that was "American Splendor", and is that, like any good movie Indie must warn him since the first min. footage, is not that you one then starts to see the movie and wondering where noses have been the director the explosions, the naked integrals and extreme violence; Once granted the bases tape, which today brings us, lost by other byways, we take into account that the script runs through the former-striper Diablo Cody, nominated for an Oscar for this reason.While the story is somewhat linear (4 seasons and what that happens), maybe the tape is, in my view, the interpretation of Page sobervia, which gives life to this excentrica and vivacious Juno, which neither silent none of which thinks, nor cut hair to make, not just what comes it in WINS, but also make things very clear everyone, and is, as they used to say out there, with 16 years already it can be (or not) very well furnished head.The independent film back in luck, sensational work of direction in a history of those with final moral like that, especially recommended to all those facing paternity (responsible or irresponsible) or those who with 16 years believe that they have little to do and nothing to live.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2691

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Desmembrados

muchocine

It's quite scary, it is very bloody, get to keep the pace and tension constantly allowing us also breathe a little and even make us drop a laugh with the already discussed gags. Proposed intelligent that manages to entertain and surprise hit as a whole.

The journey of a group of workers from an English arms company to Hungary to promote the feeling of teamwork and the corporatist partnership, becomes a terrible nightmare. The proposal of starting is attractive to then get put back to half a dozen unsuspecting, stereotyped and very recognizable characters in the hands of a murderer sadico, cruel and unscrupulous, i.e. on the proposal of always. That hardly can be original to this stage and after fifteen parts of "Friday 13", many more "Halloween", sagas of "Screem" with all its imitations and after the even more recent "Saw", "Hostel", "Tourists" and company, the attempt to stand out from all of these previous ones arriving directly in the mixture of genres. "The great and also English"Shaun of the Dead"(zombie Party) mixed humor with genre zombies, in this, Christopher Smith also combines certain doses of humour with, in this case, rugged, realistic and brutal terror which is normally the case in this new trend of movies of fear that Western tourism are finally massacred with unimaginable sadism.""Severance" works. The film takes seriously the part of terror and not neglect the comic part. It's quite scary, it is very bloody, get to keep the pace and tension constantly allowing us also breathe a little and even make us drop a laugh with the already discussed gags. Proposed intelligent that manages to entertain and surprise hit as a whole.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3932

Ana Belén Pacheco

Alvin y las Ardillas

muchocine

But do heck just how Earl nanny of digital squirrels! Do we have become all crazy? A careful and thoughtful tape disaster.

Years ago a film was considered child did not mean that an adult audience could not enjoy it. Now seems to be fought that has quality that your target audience has less than ten years. There is no way that the animation comulgue 100% with all ages so it seems that they are no longer even try.Alvin and the Chipmunks could have been an exception that many have been authentic followers of Alvin, Simon and Theodore in our early childhood the old series dates back to the 1950s). This sympathy that is acquired only after many hours of Union with the television cannot be even compared to the excitement of a new child public unknown life drawing (or worse, that they have seen new versions) and is excited to be able to see the squirrels canals and chillonas. The penalty is that the strokes that both have made us enjoy have become accomplished Visual effects that have managed that rodents are pretty mediocre and even boring.The proposal to turn so likeable guys in an animal-band design with songs and choreographies as if they were taken directly from a video clip of the Backstreet Boys is without doubt, a mistake. But if there is something much worse than all these together profanity that is his main actor Jason Lee, who had a nearly pristine and surreal career alternating major independent films with food surpluses. But do heck just how Earl nanny of digital squirrels! Do we have become all crazy? A careful and thoughtful tape disaster.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1856

Tito Chinchan

La casa de cera

muchocine

If you are cool scares of disgust, maybe you are interested. If searching the film of fear which appears in the trailers, better you alquilais the Exorcist or something so that this gives more disgust than fear.

I think there are two ways to be scary, with disgust or scares. For example, a film in the someone looks at a clouded mirror and when it cleans, sees that it has behind a gentleman knife ready, i.e. scare. If in the same case before, instead of a knife ready Lord, have a man with the face falling to horns, eyes hanging out the orbits and that one pulls the hair to locks, this is disgusting. The first way I like, the second seems nasty (though an extensive audience). If there are people who like films of Antena 3 at midday, why not you will have people who likes the giblets?The film is about some kids who deserve to die from the first scene (this it contribute I). By circumstances of life, decide to go to a distant city to see the end of not is that League. For the same reasons that nobody knows, they decide to go on secondary roads. When night falls, they camped in a strange place that smells a little weird. The girl becomes the brave and the next day, he decides to investigate the smell. It comes from a grotesque scenery in which a Lord that disgusts pulls the corpses found in the ditch. And with this shit of introduction, a Spanish Lord has done a film facilitates and a bad time.I think that it is the first time that the film telling, I put it to give birth. I always I hope this paragraph. In the end. The film is a Cobblers that gives much disgust and little scare. The characters, as I say, deserve to die in a road accident before arriving at the ghost town. The dumbest character is the brother of the protagonist, an expresidario that bad that you want to appear, seems to jerk. More forced character. The sets, that Yes, they are quite interesting, and the wax figures acojonan. The general idea is not bad, but that shit fattest development. Especially grilled give us until they reach the people that matters very little.In short, if you are cool scares of disgust, maybe you are interested. If searching the film of fear which appears in the trailers, better you alquilais the Exorcist or something so that this gives more disgust than fear.That ascazo!Besitos.P.D: The scene at the piano yet stir me the stomach.Pd2: now that I think may have to see the disgust that I gave the two bottles of wine which had been between chest and back. Who knows.P.D.3: House of wax if that cool, although physically complicadilla.P.D.4: If at least were naked breasts of virginal maidens, but not even that.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2424

Francisco Bellón

Transformers

muchocine

Transformers is an acceptable action film, which despite their flaws will delight lovers of this genre

There are some people that are synonymous with success, and in Hollywood nobody discusses the ability to attract the public with both Michael Bay and Steven Spielberg. Both have made some of the greatest campanazos in recent years, and their first collaboration promises to burst the ticket offices of half the world. So confident are the success of Transformers, that even before opening, its sequel is already announced.The Autobots and the Decepticons fought a civil war for millennia, and both groups sought cube, an artifact of unimaginable power. Thousands of years ago, the cube crashed on Earth, and now the only hope for mankind lies in Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf), who holds the key to find the artifact. The oddest thing transformers is that being a film just on the transformers, you forgive the repetition, they have so little prominence therein. The characters of American soldiers, have much more importance and minutes on screen for example. And it is not to create any diplomatic conflict with United States, but film exhales a jingoistic whiff cheap Strip on his back. And we do not want to delve even deeper into the wound, but what a coincidence occurring coincidentally these coincidences, in the majority of countries premiered on July 4, that if someone does not know, is a national holiday in United States. Let's be honest, the script is not exactly a marvel of cinematic prose; It is full of the typical clichés, inconsistencies and crude jokes, typically in an action film, we will. The film takes enough to boot, the first forty minutes aren't but a tedious introduction to some charitable soul had sever in the editing room. It seems as if that first part of the tape outside a mere excuse that Michael Bay recreate in the figure and curves of infarction of Megan Fox. It may be that the type of audience who directed the film was not clear enough. Once they enter in scene the transformers, the panorama changes radically. And it is that Michael Bay you can be criticized for many things, but we must recognize that it is a great director of action stories. While it is true that there are some sequences in which seems to be more aware look flat impossible to carry out a coherent narrative and show to the public in an appropriate way the action that takes place. The transformers are very well made, thanks to an excellent work of the Visual effects team.Transformers is an acceptable action film, which despite their flaws will delight lovers of this genre. The best advice that can be given when watching the new work from Michael Bay is that it should not take very seriously. If not, infuriating startup and continuing failures and inconsistencies of the script traumatize anyone.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/262

Oscar Cantero

Delitos menores

muchocine

It seems a done homemade film simply to kill the film bug of the own Duchovny

Tom is a son of single mother who lives in the Greenwich Village New York, at the dawn of the 1970s. His best friend and co-worker of amusement is mentally limited Concierge of their Institute. When the slow but irresistible over the years becomes an adult Tom, our protagonist decides to embark on a personal quest to reveal you the keys of his childhood and adolescence, with particular emphasis on inquire into the relationship maintained with an enigmatic woman who was part of the prison population from a nearby prison. Through the answers you find, it hopes to grow as a person and thereby improve its difficult relations with those around you and their negative social adaptation, in general. Minor offences belongs to the genre known as generational drama, which aims to simply reflect the difficulties of a person to assimilate the changes inherent in the advent of adulthood. David Duchovny, the famous Fox Mulder from X-files, still greatly burdened by his character in the series of fiction, and fails to make the leap in quality that makes years hopefully. In this production he is screenwriter, director and actor, in what looks like a film made just to kill the film bug of the own Duchovny (he himself stated that he had written the script in a week). His friend Robin Williams, once again, sobreactúa. And if on top of that the female protagonist is his wife in real life, Téa Leoni, since we're almost talking about a home movie. With all this, it is logical that in most parts of the world not have released on film, but directly on DVD. But of course, Spain is different.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/901

José A. Peig

Déjà Vu

muchocine

A film with their points in favour, but too saturated with topics of superficiality, of Sci-Fi relamida, predictable resolutions. But it is also a good toy to have a fun time, widening a little movie fan manga.

The title of the film can be misleading, if we attend the implicit content that takes place along a narrative, as I would say, "to catch-up", but the truth is that the director and the writers never lose sight Essentials; narration seamless and bluntly, I would say. He said that the title can move to deception because what is emphasized here is another thing, supporting in repeated situations that referred to the common and strange sense of "this I have lived", which is no more than an excuse for structuring the story. In fact, it is one speech - another one - about God or the existence of a divine order, claiming the value of sacrifice within social and symbolic post-11 September. Film ideological, controlled and regurgitado by the industry and the propaganda apparatus that leads behind.The idea is very simple; Police thriller mixed with elements and characteristic of the science fiction themes. And that is what Scott wants to create; a serious film about the human condition in a specific context. The fantastic elements serve to marinate and brighten a little plot, a topical and relamida history in hundreds of films past and present. That Yes, in specific situations manages to be original in the persecution by road to two times. In other words, the only way to save the movie was introducing temporary travel, which isn't anything new. A word that defines the main problem of this film - and that is also the problem of most of the current commercial cinema - is the word "saturation". Topics and clichés, saturation saturation of "latigillos" of police suspense and the genre of science fiction. Both in the characterization and plot approach, everything is based on insubstantial clichés.The temporal paradoxes, the Patriot psicokiller, the ubiquitous secondary cast that has another function that the make of "stuffed", typical situations "in extremis". This same material, under a fresh and genuine look, could offer much more, but here insists on the pale portrait and the remake of genera conjugated rather clumsily. The Mise en scène loses one hand that WINS on the other: strong close-up and movements and electrifying changes. Serves as effective visual style that conforms well to the tone of the story, but, once again, we ended up in the saturation: Medley telefilmico, without a true aesthetic style. Under the electric pulse of the camera there is no more than inanity and dramatic trick. However, has its point of honesty since the story takes place, as indicated in a previous paragraph, fluently and with a more than correct dramatic sense, framing the Odyssey spatio-temporal agent protagonist in a process of philosophical pretensions (that Yes, very well-worn and little original) without the need to give explanations that disrupt the narrative flow. Each meaning emerges in each of gestures, situations and "clashes" with the destination, always maintaining the central idea that much is intended to ameliorate, change or introduce a variation that is essential in the ongoing storm, there is always an unalterable redoubt, an immovable upper order against the wishes of the human being. And there is a price to pay.In short, a film with their points in favour, but too saturated with topics of superficiality, of Sci-Fi relamida, predictable resolutions. But it is also a good toy to have a fun time, widening a little movie fan manga.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3753

Ramón Besonias

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Best taken I am legend as a more popcorn, but without girl showing curves (the dog Sam lacks). And to follow all the same. When you enter the cinema, it leaves the brain out.

The generation of Matheson (novelist) and Lawrence (director and producer) read books, and watch movies. Both, which writes these lines, inoculaba in his spare disturbing tales of horror and science fiction, and B-movies today - many of them - are recognized as relating cultural. In those stories we found good times of action and fear, as well as suggestive metaphors about the world and ourselves. However, the generation for which the history of I am legend is told is a generation already not read (or barely), but that devours frames of film made in uses wherever you can. And it shows in the pace and lack of courage to handle scripts for productions such as this which we are talking about.I am legend is an efficient production, as many many more which we will make live a more bearable Christmas. So a literary claim who knows the viewer taken as regards, and if you don't know who was Richard Matheson then don't worry, add as bait advertising the presence of Smith (in new plan American hero) and his estilazo hiphopero, sliding his great guy gym by a New York apocalyptic but dignified, accompanied by his dog Sam. The rest do a few special effects that life to the more skeptical. And it is already. Guaranteed success.I am legend will not be a lasting product in the memory of the Spanish Viewer, and much less in contributions to the genre of horror or science fiction. But this not worthy a matchless technical work, some disturbing scenes, and ceases to count. If we try to rely on his literary comparisons are revealed more than hateful. There is no or hero scientific or more survivors support the plot, nor vampires where used with brain, nor end made in the Matheson Novella. Matheson underlines the solitude of the character, without political metaphors post 9 / 11. It focuses on the psychological aspects of Neville and takes the vampire icon to give it more scientific realism and suggest a juicy reflection on the concept of social normalcy and its perverse effects.In the version of Lawrence there is little psychological approach, despite the fact that the script starts suggesting otherwise. The scene of the video store is notable in that regard. But the action soon becomes what it must never have to pretend to not be: pure excessively seasoned spectacle of a cheat political propaganda with a nothing lightweight colorful conservative.Is true that the director could have tapped the potential of the book by Matheson to suggest a powerful metaphor for the acceptance of the other in situations of fears or socially accepted prejudice. But not. Is more than the Bush era end up managing to all vermin living vaccine of liberalism conservative. where is then the novelty of I am legend? Because nothing less in the strange relationship that established the indent between alleged skepticism of New York citizens after the attacks of the 11-S and a history of terror and conventional science fiction. "My name is Robert Neville." I am a survivor in New York City. If there is someone there, please. "You are not alone". This is the desperate message released by radio the protagonist who could stay alive. Dr. Neville survives in a ghost town, bleak, a zone zero perpetua, threatened by beings infected, dehumanized. "I am here to bring light to the darkness," says a promotional spot.And at the very least lets give the secondary (by way of announcing Angel of hope) role to a Brazilian character (do a diplomatic nod to Lula?), that while it will serve Friday to a Crusoe depressed by loneliness, it remains mere recipient of the blessings of the sacrificed American friend.The director, Francis Lawrence, drawn with this a not so faint (and of course a political correctness that puts hairs as hooks to all attentive spectator) metaphor on the State assumption of mind of every American self-respecting as such (patriotic, to be exact), threatened by the hopelessness of terrorism in his own House. And in turn plays for the umpteenth time the megalomaniacal iconicidad of the American redeeming hero, always ready to give their last breath for a free world.Do not be afraid, American. Science and our abiding faith in our lifestyle will help us to resist and ultimately win the war to this virus. For this company we have the best, a hero that despite being human, not allowed to carry by discouragement and their efforts at the end will give its fruit. The objective is to morale to one America disenchanted by both critical discourse, more that help generate discontent and apathy. Let us stop Communist fabrications and hope dad State, which ensures the designs of a country was born to succeed (with God's help, of course) with loving justice.But what can import us European viewers a political reading of what is mere spectacle! Best taken I am legend as a more popcorn, but without girl showing curves (the dog Sam lacks). And to follow all the same, that's what we have USA protecting the free world and offering our evenings of Christmas fun. When you enter the cinema, it leaves the brain out.Finally, we will always remain the great novels of Matheson. For those who have not read this emblematic author of science fiction of the 1950s, them maybe interested to know that many of his works have been adapted to cinema with greater or less success. Note the devil on wheels (Spielberg, 1971) - both short format but eternal in the memory, the incredible shrinking man (Arnold, 1957) - perhaps the most suggestive of all and the closest to the theme of I am legend-, the final step (Koepp, 2000) - a film disturbing, but absorbed by the phenomenon the sixth sense-, beyond dreams (Ward)(1998), Somewhere in time (Szwarc, 1980).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3979

Oscar Martínez

Viaje a Darjeeling

muchocine

Do you know what 'I went on trip to the India and it changed my life'? Then that. Nevertheless, eresulta entertenida, with Jason Schwartzman in State of grace.

Directed by Wes Anderson's controversial and starring Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody, Jason Schwartzman, Anjelica Huston, Bill Murray, Amara Karan, Camilla Rutherford, Irfan Khan and Natalie Portman, Darjeeling Limited is one of the first releases on our billboards of this Australasia it, Francis, Peter and Jack are three brothers who are have been distancing with the passage of time and longer even speak. The death of his father brings together them again and this reunion arises the need to strengthen their family ties. It is then when Francis, the eldest of the brothers proposes a journey by train by the India as a spiritual pilgrimage. The tour will do so in the Darjeeling Limited, the railway line that runs through the country from one end to the other. Already on the train, they begin fighting, until physical and verbal disputes and his behavior comes to such an extent that they are forced to get off the train. From here on, left to its own resources, begins a new journey which was not in his plans.Like all movies of this Texas filmmaker, Darjeeling Limited not leave anyone indifferent, not because it is a controversial film, nor much less, but because of the style of its director; films such as the Tenenbaums and The life aquatic have received ovations and despellejamientos alike, and no doubt same thing will happen with this trip to Darjeeling.Enfocada as a spiritual journey in which three brothers in high class return to (re) join through a journey along the India, Darjeeling Limited is starring three actors as private such as Owen WilsonAdrien Brody and Jason Schwartzman, in some peculiar curiously hierarchical roles serving as breeding ground for all kinds of accusations, grudges and unspeakable fears.But go by parts: the film begins with the short film by way of preface entitled Hotel Cheválier, played by Jason Schwartzman and Natalie Portman, and that helps us clear scale to be able to guess the Darjeeling Limited paths. In this way, the bucolic Paris grey gives way to the vivid colours of the India served through curious levels of the Chamber of Wes Anderson, who shows us a sort of totally nonsensical initiatory journey and supposedly irreverent, although in general terms, and apart from certain conatuses of brilliance, we please something decaffeinated and inconsequential in various bars.Despite this, Darjeeling Limited is not a bad film or much less, and contains certain passages that you simply life thanks to a perennial melancholy patina, before returning to a film which, unfortunately, is diluting hopeless slowly despite the more than decent interpretations of the trio protagonist, among which stands out above all, and by far a Jason Schwartzman who never ceases to amaze me, while Owen Wilson is who leads the main weight of the movie with pretty solvency.It is true that Darjeeling Limited seems to one server as the personal experience of an accidental tourist who discovers his own happiness in unhappiness from the rest, a true existential journey for a few days. Wes Anderson's film sins perhaps bombastic and some emotional walk at home, despite all its efforts to shun those labels, so its ninety minutes seem quite longer than they actually are.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2325

Ramón Balcells

Entre mujeres

muchocine

The staging and narration, although they do not end up being too personal, reach a level that surpasses the telefilm.

I do not think that anyone in his life has not seen a telefilm of Antena 3 in the afternoon. I confess that I've done more once, and two. We could say that they are divided into family and "psychological" thrillers or romantic dramas. Among women, I believe that it would have been better still a telefilm than a film to theaters. And why? Well simply because it has all the features of one of these clunkers, but yes, with successful points and convincing performances. If these two aspects was them, include at least I, to the film by newcomer Jon Kasdan list of these telefilms.Already in the beginning, I could distinguish this difference, with that scene of "break-up" with a beautiful Elena Anaya (only intervenes in this short sequence and a few flash-backs where just that kissing). This scene is well shot and the dialogue is minimally well. But is from there when things begin to roll. The chicho becomes the absolute protagonist and travels to his grandmother's House to change of scenery. There he meets two women: a mother and daughter (two charming Meg Ryan and Kirsten Stewart). And I guess the writer also falls into the temptation of knowing other techniques and leave that you balance the script. Here is where it shows that inseguirdad in set containing the film and this lack of narrative force. Also note that sometimes you don't know if you're watching a drama, a comedy or a romantic movie. I think that one of its most serious failures is not finding what genre belongs. Between women can qualify for irregular, insecure and lack of personality, but we can also say that it is a film, at times, quite well narrated and some interpretations, not excellent, but notable. So I will go to the grain and you comment on what seemed to me better.As I say, the staging and storytelling, although they do not end up being, in some moments, too personal, reach a level that surpasses the telefilm. Examples of good planning would be the two scenes of kisses (the rain with Ryan and the night with Stewart). Both get a convincing emotion and that the truth is it is appreciated, because many other films do not succeed. And finally, speaking of the actors. Adam Brody, the protagonist (many I have seen in the O.C. series), plays its role properly, without more. It offers what we want, a performance nothing surreal nor pedantic. But what stands out, at least for me, is the appearance of the already not so young Kirsten Stewart, in a role that you take affection thanks to a really successful interpretation. Meg Ryan, I guess it passed through there, is the "key" role of the love story, though he is only appreciated his appearance by having not seen for years, because its interpretation is nothing out of this world. And it is rare that in a type of film and actions come to be the best of all.In short, we have a film failed, generally speaking, albeit with a few correct interpretations that make us look a bit in memory (for the next two hours out of the film, obviously). Still, it is too irregular and on almost every occasion lacks personality. If you have not seen, do not need that you lose time. Not disappoint you, but it will not like you. It is, simply, sosa.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/843

Mala Besta

El perfume

muchocine

A rather boring movie that will probably like the stalwarts of the book and three people more. Recommended that burrow the nose.

With "perfume: story of a murderer" comes to our screens a new hero: Jean-Baptiste Grenouille and his alter ego, the pituitary man, which is not steel as Superman, but also lacks, because with its marvelous nose can smell the bullets to the wind and avoid them. And if you don't believe me, go see the movie, go.Based on the known Patrick Süskind bestseller, "the perfume: story of a murderer" tells the story of Jean-Baptiste Grenouille (Ben Whishaw), from his imprisonment and sentenced to death, point that begins the film, back to the presidio to their rough birth. A Parisian and miserable orphan who was born with a marvelous nose, Grenouille can be distinguished with her all kinds of smells, uncluido the patchouli and vegetables people throws. After numerous misadventures get starting his career as a perfumer under the protection of Baldini (Dustin Hoffman), and with it he discovers the existence of a perfect perfume that nobody has been able to synthesize. No one except him, of course. And so embarks on journey to Grasse, city in which attempt to obtain the essence from its basic ingredients: the smell of damsels that Grenouille acogota previously. Of course, the disappearance of these women does laugh to Antoine Richis (Alan Rickman), one of the Councillors. Of itself, the script is not necessarily boring, to make abusive and use quite annoying voice in off of a sexagenarian Narrator, whose main objective is the explain the feelings of the protagonist, since if they had to be adivinados through the performance of Ben Wishaw, the film need subtitles. One of the fundamental components of the story also the world of smells, as well as in the original book. But while in this the use of the word allowed some slack to the writer when you try to transmit the olfactory sensations of its protagonist, in the film Tykwer is do the same visually, but what Súskind was a slack, here becomes handshake. All these moments are reduced to one or more players with the face of Ecstasy while Fund can happen the most outlandish things and/or what, from pigeons arrullando among the flowers of spring mass orgies.Tykwer also has other problems, which it much descompensa the pace of the film. While at certain times it entertains offering recurring plans of Grenouille dedicated to the more mundane tasks while background sounds like a Symphony, in others the story advances treméndamente fast, as if suddenly someone had noticed that there were already two hours and there not passing anything. And in one of these apurones, the film ends towards the great final climax, moment in which takes up the timeline of the first minutes. At this time, "the perfume: story of a murderer" offers the viewer a finale in my opinion contains two of the three worst shot and most ridiculous in the history of the cinema scenes.We have a tremendous European blockbuster, with creative German and English-speaking cast, which no doubt turn it into a candidate many Goya Spanish film. And as such blockbuster, the visual aspect and the setting are greatly cared, in line with the current historical, which usually require that everyone be very ugly and dirty. Again the white wigs and rice powder cover black nails and the filth that in "perfume: story of a murderer" covers it all. In addition, Tykwer recreates the close-up, so everyone can see the decay of all living being that looming screen.As for the cast, it is unevenly divided. While quite unable to actors such as Ben Wishaw (the protagonist) steal almost all of the footage, great professionals such as Dustin Hoffman and Alan Rickman are left with the crumbs. Despite this, and especially the latter, they get enough lift the film, especially in comparison with Wishaw. It is not that the boy has no expressiveness. It is a very expressive player. But the problem is that it has only an expression, and she has to endure the nearly two and a half hours of film, which become cuesta above the Viewer, so imagine him.Finally, a somewhat boring movie that will probably like the book unconditional and three more people. Recommended that burrow the nose.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2304

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider)

muchocine

Mediocre gimmick of series B or C that aims only to sell an image and open, if possible, a franchisee...

Spoil the Ghost Rider with this prank with budget has no forgiveness. Da like Nicolas Cage is placed the chupa of leather, boot the fardona bike and arda as a yankee mascletà. Da same as bunglers responsible for selling us this crappy have sworn by Mefistófeles who love the Marvel Comics Group. What they have done is enfangar her, spoil a good opportunity - which was given to Spider-man or the X patrol - to ensure that the myth of the comic reaches a new audience, though I imagine the barque of adolescents wagered on queues won't demand too much and their faces leaving will be glittering and bpublish. The mine, which is far from having acne, already a few decades ago has not gone of the spasms. Or perhaps disappointed because I like Cage, I am devotee of the Marvel fan and always have the noble desire that does not spoil these material noble that led my childhood into my teenage years and now, in different formats, guardianship children of my son towards his. In any case, the perpetrator of this flamboyant infamy (Mark Steven Johnson) already warned of his mediocrity when I put in the still less worthy Elektra or Daredevil Billboard. Now confined itself to write (multifaceted boy) a modeled script of the comic that has contributed nothing personal. Away from these creative levels fantastic the unforgettable Simon Birch, but inspiration eloped as had, apparently, reflexes, or desire for a prosecution in rule. This Ghostrider has, however, a notable technical level, what less. The rider Burns credibly, go sentence. The trouble is when there is no combustion: there everything is languid, dull, poorly led and worse presented. Pseudo-religiosas comics activate mechanisms mystical that already I do not share, but not slow to understand that there are public avid for these apocalyptic brass bands between the day of judgment day and the arrival of the Antichrist: echoes of Dan Brown for modern minds. Anyway the original story of Acrobat Johnny Blaze sold his soul to the devil is most and is not just burdening it with these religious speculation again minted. To make higher the pira expiatory add dialogs are ridiculous, although one has confidence that this trash of parliaments was written wrong to post to give a touch can spoof? to the farce. Peter Fonda near a motorcycle seems Easy rider, but here are painfully drag and not at any time gives the impression of acojonar staff in his role as the devil mismísmo. Eva Mendes her dress up as if to burst the shirts by his breast audacity and Nicolas Cage, note that I've left the friend to the end, does not put any efforts to be an actor and confined to exercise some horrific grimaces that do not give the tormented Blaze traces facial of truly being under the chains of torment. A long time ago that master Coppola's nephew does not give the size in a big screen Adaptation (the man of the time) because Wicker Man and World Trade Center are harsh evidence of the dramatic pasotismo. Not the lack of ambition of the film should be overlooked in very specific areas: poor little wealth. The rider those snack in a blink of tap. Or that ride in the desert (ay that air comic) into the dusty and spectral village with two riders in flames on the back of their respective groups. Up the Terrible villain is laughable: what lack of courage, what little enthusiasm. And finances are not argument: are loose when handling digital truquitos and other tricks of face to the gallery and the wonderful trailers. Here he had enough, have known, see which advertised. We had spared us both.Better times will come and will bring us other heroes and other villains. Meanwhile I'm going to the shelf and I wear for this night predator. John McTiernan in its best times. The only salvageable Schwarzie movie. The apotheosis of action cinema. A caste, racial hero, brave and ready: no mystical or lost love. A villain bastard and perfect: not reflexes hablaba.0 all reflexes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4229

Ana Belén Pacheco

La Sombra del Cazador

muchocine

Richard Shepard directs and also writes the screenplay staying anchored in an unlikely succession of scenes that sometimes rub the ridiculous

Richard Gere has turgid. Isn't as cool as in the 1990s and finally it shows in their tapes (it has cost him but he has finally grasped the concept that be hoary and sexy is not attractive when you're almost an old man).In the shadow of the Hunter it plays a fearless reporter of war in full replay of Bosnia loses the chaveta and gets to rant. The ten years of the conflict become reporters to the area and he reunited with his camera of a lifetime (that is now a well-off Chamber of the host star in New York and not the play in armed conflicts). Then it drops the bomb, says that he knows where to find the Fox, a type which controlled the roost during the war with which also has some outstanding accounts. As journalists are not stone just, along with rookie turn, kicking the mountain in search of the bad guys.Richard Shepard directs and also writes the screenplay staying anchored in an unlikely succession of scenes that sometimes rub the ridiculous. Not pro opts social complaint or by the thriller so decides to use parapet its three protagonists using their performances to save the tape.We miss a little consistency between the complaint and the actions that take place on the screen. Also at some point turns everything into a kind of comedy film where it seems more important the skullduggery of the character of Gere that the objective of the group.A disaster turned into any commercial product.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3478

Jeremy Fox

La Huella

muchocine

An entretenidilla movie that remains light years of what might be and that, in fact, already was.

I've already said several times that if it was not because the director was Kenneth Branagh this remake not I be interested slightest. And it is, in general, I think doing remakes of great films of the past is unnecessary. But the task becomes daunting if the film, in addition to being a jewel, is a unique and unrepeatable tape. Examples might include "Casablanca", "Laura", "Jennie" or "Footprint". Branagh, an excellent director squandered by the industry, try to uncheck the original tape through a completely different scenery, changing the Baroque style of the decorations by the simplicity of the free spaces, removing all visual obstacles that in the original tape helped create the atmosphere oppressive and morbid.The problem is that, as indeed the oppressive environment must create it as, Branagh is forced to take a similar visual solution and so need to locate the camera at impossible angles or focus the scene through a security camera for framing the character visually move the feeling of being trapped. This solution visual, intelligent, sometimes works and other shows excessive and forced.For the same purpose is used the "technology" of the House. But, in addition to showing us the most universal remote in history (an only button controls dozens of functions other than the House), is extremely forced the Michael Caine character change the light of each room in which to enter, or project multiple images in two facing mirrors or, finally, atmosphere the scene to taste of the director. The film is trick, Yes, but it should not be noted.Despite this, or perhaps for that reason, the work of Branagh ends up be the interesting thing about the film with the interpretation of Michael Caine, a monster from the scene of the largest in the history of cinema, and a Jude Law that is able to keep the type.Patrick Doyle's soundtrack is also that attract attention by their quality, something that should not be surprised seeing the copyright of soundtracks of "much ado about nothing", "Hamlet" or "sense and sensibility".Harold Pinter where I see another problem of the tape is curiously in the indent of the nobel. Because while the dialogues are still bright and resourceful, Pinter decided to introduce a homosexual to the story, dot while some see signs of this already in the Mankiewicz, here shown as a key in the history.And there I do believe that they are wrong because, in this way, you lose a little sense the theme of the game by the game, the duel of wits of revenge for revenge. I think, indeed, that this "epilogue" remains part of the sense everything what has seen earlier in the film.Posts to comment on fallito, and here it comes a SPOILER of the fat, I have to mention that a shot of adaptor can not launch a body through the air: a trap very blatant and totally unnecessary if it weren't for the obsession of the contemporary cinema to show everything on screen.As happens to me almost wherever I go disappointed by one of the great directors I have stressed more negative than the positive in my criticism. But that that I don't think that we we have a bad film because it is not. Strange thing, coming from Branagh, nor it is good. "Footprint" (Sleuth) version 2007 is, in short, an entretenidilla film that remains light years of what might be and that, in fact, already was.Final rating: 5 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1207

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Fuego en el cuerpo

muchocine

It is an excellent black movie that joins the sex - and its classical aura of fatalism and reverses - as Apostolic engine of the whole narrative fabric.

Unfortunately, body heat is not an erotic film flavored with a history of black series, and first advertised in a display information interested speculation: is an excellent black movie that joins the sex - and its classical aura of fatalism and reverses - as Apostolic throughout the narrative warp engine. The tragedy arrope the end of footage is not surprising: like, is mark of genre, which adds nothing new. Kasdan, very intelligent director and fine stylist of the advertising market, takes the sketches that crave you, the clichés, the common places of the accessible inventory, here and there and filmed with desparpajo, with absolute knowledge of the medium of film a personal, beautiful work.While the Turner never was my prayer book santa, here seduce, as the concise and sensible character of William Hurt in the role of lawyer in collusion with sin (the meat of the femme fatal so beloved in the film noir) to finish perpretando predictable crime.One reminds Jack Nicholson cake flour in the postman always flame twice of Bob Rafelson or the first version of Garnett Garfield or the Don Johnson lips fiery hole to find a background, but is Hurt by my way, who takes the cake, perhaps because he who most reliably represents the role of sex and does not fall, as Johnson, as the same Nicholson, save acting distances in the gestures of the first free and this raucous and pathetic divismo of the second. Ed Harris, who plays a similar role in China Moon and meets no more recently springs.In the feminine side, Jessica Lange, Lana Turner, Virginia Madsen, Madeleine Stowe, Veronica Lake, naming women then and now. Kathleen Turner has it infinitely easier than them: should be for tolerance of these frivolous times that the film not only does not cover their intimacies (genitalia) but that airea them: with full knowledge of what this exhibition will bring box office. We are all voyeurs good when we need to. And that body heat, as I say, not abused the erotic helpings, but who prefers loitering the murky world of feelings, of morals, contributing to the genus traps a rather than never stopped study allowances and repentances of crime.When other sisters movies arañan superficially, without further, here we have colourful film folk atmosphere (South night sweat, the spilled tópido as gasoline on a bonfire in darkness) where Kasdan, who is old Fox in these affairs, joins classic thriller and criminologist melodrama.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3022

Rafa Ferrer

Sicko

muchocine

Moore, play a bit with the feelings of the Viewer, have to be condescending and to realize that not only Spain people live with unusual income and that in the States "The country of opportunities" is the thing much more serious than it seems at first glance.

From "Bowling for Columbine" documentary 1st of this "orondo" filmmaker, I was attracted by the figure of Moore, and after seeing "Fahrenheit 911" with more reason, since both feel for Bush the same antipathy, this time the source of their "iras" is the Bush Administration regards the insurance medical/pharmaceutical industries and is which, unfortunately in a country as developed as the Statesthe "americanitos of a foot" do not have a health as in Spain, so much we complain and laugh "Spanish health" and things at least as primary as the 1st "idem" attention her make us for free, and it is that what Spain are keeps us in concept of Social Security in the USA not, that is paid to the worker, and he, on his own, has to afford health insurance, nothing easy, since mission as the "impediments" list is long, long and difficult I would say.It is true than typical in Moore, play a bit with the feelings of the Viewer, there to be condescending and to realize that not only Spain people live with unusual income and that in the States "The country of opportunities" this the thing much more serious than it seems at first glance, and that the insurance companies (I repeat, USA no security social.) are much more cruel than it seems, denying insurance by thin or fat, leaving families on the street, or denying something as easy as an implant hearing to a creature that begins to live, so Moore plasma with great ease, speed and hilarity on the screen, trying and getting at the same time, that we shrink not only the heart but also the soul, in the first stages of footage.Moore not only analyzes the lives of these "unfortunate people", but the world of professionals that comprise, from doctors, until former employees of insurers, translating, which sadly not only in the USA is also a reality, there is not the person, there is only business, and Moore and the companies know, is as that article that spoke of what it was polluting Al Gore in their appointments with the press about his documentary "green", that the business is higher than the interest prior, sad, but real and save dollars, more is better, the rule number ONE of every company, be devoted to what be devoted, even to human lives, arriving to assess whether a drug is necessary or not to go on living, with unfortunate and harmful consequences.Moore undertakes to treat the images of the most bloody way, with music sad when the occasion requires and historical passages that you afianzas if his narration is even more worth and, as in previous tapes, giving background and packing everything what counts through the voiceover, and a thousand and one narrative resource utilization.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1880

Tito Chinchan

Inside deep throat

muchocine

Shocking documentary about the most profitable film of all time. It is a reflection of a society that is very advanced and is motivated by religious fanaticism, the shadow and absolute law enforcement powers. Very necessary.

They have managed, I can only say that, what they have achieved. See that people say you've seen documentaries of the Serengeti where the lion sestea low in baobad and the Leone goes hunting, so returning to the home which sesteaba it take a cap of 10 seconds before returning to the siesta. And we all know that it is a lie, that loves to run the the Serengeti Lion run to do like him (without the polvete) and bleed the sofa. Because they have succeeded. They have managed to combine the culture of seeing a documentary, with cultural see a porn movie. The bad thing not worth to take the siesta, but if to help raise the middle of patria machidad, who walks on the floor.The film, forgiveness, the documentary on which say the most profitable film of all time, Deep Throat. With a budget of 25 000 dollars it is believed that he has raised a whopping 600 million of dollars. How he did that? This is what tells the documentary. But not only that, if not the revolution in the country of the opportunity and alleged freedoms. Where, under skin of lamb, hide wolves eager to nail their jaws in everything that smacks of liberation. Anodadado I am still, and not only because of the skill in the art felatorio of the girl.Well, I must say that the critical documentary genre coming from the other side of the pond tend me to like much. In this case, it is true that we can not believe what we see. As I have said before, if this happens in the Spain of the Caudillo, since it would have its logic, but in the country of opportunities it seems unreal. Which could assemble for this film totally exceeds the limits of the human imagination, leaving open to ridicule his famous Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition. The documentary is divided into parts, the filming of the movie, its dissemination, the uproar, the trial (I swear there was opinion, by the way, get Jack Nicholson as a young man) and the resolution of the story. Totally impressive and indispensable, although leaving something strong and hilarious scenes.In short, shocking documentary about the most profitable film of all time. It is a reflection of a society that is very advanced and is motivated by religious fanaticism, the shadow and absolute law enforcement powers. Very necessary.Tremendous documentalón.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2403

Alex Largo

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

Although the animation is superior in everything else, Shrek the third stays behind, but very, very back.

Shrek. Who does not know this Green ogre who, with the help of his "noble steed" swept the box office around the world in 2001 with a fresh, original and fun Ribbon.As it was expected, came the second part. That, although it was not the first, was a very good sequel which consisted of 2 extremely charismatic characters that hechizaron to the public, with his wand (the great fairy godmother) and the other with their eyes (Puss in boots). And who does not want the thing, became the animated film highest grossing of history.And now, and as you would expect, comes the third part. Third party that should never see the light.Since it was announced that Andrew Adamson left the work of director and that the original writers were leaving, many feared the worst. "And with good reason.""Shrek the third" starts well differently from their predecessors, and only the prologue predicted us changes. changes for the worse.Although the film remains, slightly, the personality of the previous installments, it fails. Where the others were surprised, this is sinking. Why? Because it never ceases to be a rehash of the other two, with a plot worthy of an episode of the Lunnies.Aunque animation is superior in everything else, "Shrek the third stays behind, but very, very back."And perhaps, the major culprit is none other than Arthur, Arti. If "Shrek" (9/10) surprised by its freshness and "Shrek 2" (8/10) is arropaba of good characters to maintain a good argument and a minimum of quality, "Shrek the third" only counts as only new character to Arti. A flat character, without grace, no spark, and primarily responsible for that the film lacks interest.As for the gags. Pretty poor considering worked were in the other two and quite simplistic (attention to the pathetic final play of the Prince), not to say terrible.Not reel me too I can only say that, this year, it is a very bad year for the third parties, I repeat, a very bad year for third parties.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1127

Bloody Will

Babel

muchocine

If you were to define a Word to?Babel? I would say: emotional. It is magnificent, and as such, it is one of the best products made this year. Please see and is advised, especially, feel.

If I had to define a word "Babel" would say: emotional. It is a film of feelings, human relations, human miseries and tragedies, the end and Cape. After spending the last few weeks watching movies you empty and with crude content, "Babel" has been around a film break. Respite for knowing that still makes film telling important stories.Iñarritu, which already showed part of him in "Amores Perros" and "21 grams" has come with "Babel" to articulate a film with a priori disjointed vidas cruzadas. To catch you after the first frame you're understanding that Morocco, Mexico and Japan are not as far as you think. Perhaps remember something a "Crash", because the drama surrounds the life of each one of the characters that make up the film, but not you confundáis, "Babel" do not have histories of racism and prejudice, in "Babel" tell stories of humans arrived to limit, the frustration, the irresponsabbilidad and the sadness.Susan (Cate Blanchett) and Richard (Brad Pitt) travel by Morocco, however we fail ever to know why are there, and what has led them to that point on the planet. However that is not the important thing, but that their relationship, of will on their fragile, be tested after a dramatic accident, in which a native family in the country will be involved. Japan, Chieko, a deaf girl, becomes their worst moments: it is still Virgin, desperately searching for romance, and you must deal with her mother's fatal death, which affects her and his father in different versions. Finally, in San Diego, two children are in the care of a Mexican maid, which, in view of the long permanence of their parents outside, shall decide to take children to the wedding of his son in Mexico with a fitting end of stroke.I would like to extend over the synopsis, but it would be to reveal you aspects of the film that I prefer to be in surprise, as I happened to me at the beginning of the film. No doubt, all the characters take wrong decisions and fatal in the majority of cases, but are not decisions that not irme none of us. Without doubt, the story of the caretaker Mexican and American children makes me goose bumps, that I think how easy it is to trust someone that can mess up to the bottom. The story in Morocco shows the simplicity of a fortuitous setback and the sadness of not knowing whether who surrounds us is in free fall full passed me on Japan.Much to my regret, and after several disagreements with Brad Pitt I must admit is that it leaves in the hands of Iñarritu. Get to maintain dramatic tension, as it must be, during his segment and its final collapse is much far from those ridiculously low tears of "Legends of passion". I would not surprise me that you entered into the Academy tickets for the next Oscars. His best counterpoint is Cate Blanchett, of which I can say that rarely disappoints me. Rinko Kikuchi, who plays the Japanese deaf girl performs the saddest performance that I have seen in recent years, and speak of emotional grief. This girl is Miss dust and trnasmite without saying a single word.Nothing matters to in "Babel" is change of the Moroccan into English, then to the Spanish and then to the Japanese. Iñarritu makes these languages to flow as one only teach us that language is phonetically distinct words, that the human soul has the same soft you are where you are. It is magnificent, and as such, it is one of the best products made this year. Please see and is advised, especially, feel.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1148

Silvia Giner

María Antonieta

muchocine

He expected to find me with something absolutely offender. I believe that the broadcast media of the film is not in line with what then shown.

Were it not for Kirsten Dunst (adorable until the delirium) me or bother to do this criticism. He hoped to find myself with something absolutely offender, because I have high hopes for the small Coppolina, as shrewd and intuitive not only to conduct but to interpret. But apart from the wonderful costumes, (outstanding) art direction and photography in the hands of Lance Acord (Lost in traslation and soon "Wild in the Streets"), what is the film, it is not that it is slow, it is that he is sleepy. The cast is great, in fact the direction of actors is another thing to highlight. I think that there was another actor better than Jason Schwartzman (we saw in Spun and we will see in 2008 for "The Fantastic Mr. Fox") to recreate the face of asshole that had the Dolphin King.And higher most of this movie is that he has the cool, the splendid, the incomparable, the Sexy, unique, the regio: David Bowie siiiiiiii stay tuned by David interprets to Nikola Tesla, oddly you enough, this man who is my platonic love since my use of reason has over 130 films to his credit.Although somewhat (read BSO) the strong bet movie, fails to surprise us and leaving us with an open mouth is by yawning may lead us.I expected something more heartbreaking end, that in fact the Dauphin and the Dauphine of France, were beheaded at the guillotine, I do not understand why this is not shown in the film. Ending a romantic and family escape in the Royal carriage. Perhaps Sofia wanted to stay with the nice part of the story?I believe that the broadcast media of the film is not in tune with what then is shown, "Sex", "Alcohol", we are on God? have them Hayles but at a level very subtle I would say.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2759

Kiko de España

El jefe de todo esto

muchocine

Personally find it me a tad excessive, because while it is true that you get to descojonar at times, the use of Automavisión leaves something to be desired, although in the case of the great Dane, one is always ready for everything.

The head of this is a comedy by Lars Von Trier and, clear, that has its pros and cons, but the case is that it is a very fun movie where I am with two huge actors: Jens Albinus (seen in dance in the dark or the idiots) and Peter Gantzler (Italian for beginners) personally seems a tad excessive, because while it is true that you get to descojonar at times, the use of Automavisión leaves something to be desired, although in the case of the great Dane one is always ready for everything. The major drawback of this method is that the continuity of sound is not respected, and can cause dizziness in the Viewer.Finally, if you have left an hour and media can see that Lars also know to entertain themselves doing easy movies. In its own way.And get the girlfriend of Rob in high fidelity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2050

Luna

Zodiac

muchocine

It would be glad to the stalwarts of the director and all those interested in detective films. Despite all I I miss the aesthetics and rhythm that gave that to me remains his masterpiece, the fight club.

The lights of the room finally shut down and I wonder with what David Fincher we're going to meet again at 24 frames per second after five long years of silence and absence of the seventh art (or Vice,) as you want to look at. It will be the Seven David Fincher, fight club or the fanfare with the camera of the panic room?From the first frame we note that Fincher has decided to abandon the aesthetic line that in the panic room he would put the camera through the loop of coffeemaker to show a visual approach more rested, suitable for telling this story that "notes" the entire process of a criminal investigation over almost twenty years. Do not leave Fincher, however, this trend to merge computer graphics with the celluloid as only he knows how to do brilliantly (there is nothing more to remember those opening credits to the room of panic or "the House ikea" of the fight club) and there are times that merges the essential element of the research, the writing of the murderer, with images in a very original way.It is not the first time that David Fincher discusses serial killers. He already did with Seven. On this occasion an actual research, to create fiction, part of a real event. From my point of view in this case Fincher speaks, rather than of murder, of the inevitability of the obsessions, because all that is involved with the case and are obsessed with him end up destroying their lives, just like the murderer killed their victims.An impeccable realization that perhaps is sometimes too many jumps spatio-temporal lose a little to the Viewer as to the continuity of the events in the narrative. Despite all I I miss the aesthetics and rhythm that gave that to me remains his masterpiece, the fight club.Currently David Fincher is competing in Cannes with this film, that criticism seems to have quite applauded.The film will like to the stalwarts of the director and all those interested in detective films. He will not like those who hate the stories with jumps in time.Final anecdote: for all those film buffs a perlite which reveals this film, Dirty Harry is based on the same case of EE serial murders.UU, only that the murderer for Dirty Harry signed as Scorpio and not as Zodiac.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1878

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Alpha Dog

muchocine

Children are idiots, the parents are idiots, children take drugs, parents take drugs, children have no future, parents did not last.

By what they say and not what we see, Alpha dog might well seem a porn movie: there is a linguistic routine based on sex and the absolute sacralization of the massive intake of drugs. There is no rock and roll: the musical plot is a hodgepodge of hip hop, industrial rock asalvajado and some strokes (very slight, very measured) of glamorous fairy tale melodies (Wild is the wind, David Bowie).History is always, but here it is told with some grace: it warns an interest out of the script and certainly at the end, like us or not, accepting that Alpha Dog is not one film of mozalbetes accelerated, titánicamente spliced and intended for meat of presidio unless a rush of speed the abotargue in one of these chairs of I don't know how many thousands of dollars that decorate the streets of these rich kids high-tech stuck to the drug lords because of small no read to Michael Ende and had generous portions of maternal affection while TV rumiaba Looney Tunes episodes. And if it works youth that Cassavetes portrays is not by necessity to random or is not because of a social or cultural revolution in the way they did their parents in the mythical late 1960s. The moral numbness and pathological stupidity of these Brats with 4 x 4 at the door and Mammoth sound chain in the living room reflects the absolute foolish of parents.The teaching of the film round that idea: these errant children have never had a family as God intended. This is shown in many sections of the film. Even the most deranged of its protagonists (Ben Foster as brother psicotrónico and placed on time total) there comes a time in which confesses that he had wanted to have a mother who you sobreprotegiera and give Cuddles in bed. In another scene, a girl almost rushed into the abyss beaten the door of his house and only manages that his mother, who celebrates the anniversary of wedding and asked it is absent for a few hours, interrupted the fornication with the husband and stopped the extra speed and pills taken to make the party complete. The mother, falls, sends a tomar por culo, crudely said.In another order of things, or is the same, Cassavetes excels in giving us an amazing parade of human waste, kids stupid and low blood flow in the area of the brain that governs the sanity and common sense. Kids who hocican the morro in beer (drink to navigate during the film) or in marijuana (smoke without stopping at the same time drink) when a problem occurs they front. Kids who consider sex a chapter added to the psychedelic trip, but without making rites of the delights not sanctify the absolute enjoyment of meat: fucked as they drink and smoke as they fucked, crudely said, of course.In this thread of things, there is a kidnapping and a revenge not finished see resolved because law catch offenders and there is no brat end that does not have its prison handkerchief. Bruce Willis, which leaves little and get content, is the padre-modelo of all this agilipollada rabble who sees in Tony Montana, the gross hero of the Scarface of Brian de Palma, the representative of his vital speech icon. Up at some point we see a poster of the film: perhaps the only reference metacultural of this Guild of psychopaths. Sharon Stone is a poorly drawn, overly protective mother as taken from a book of archetypes of cheap psychology. Both are far from supporting any weight in the plot and are lost in brief and very unnecessary roles. Disastrous, by not credible, the emergence of Sharon Stone, engordada, makeup so it seems a parody of makeup, as a mother devastated by the loss of the child.Everything is based on real events us does appreciate the good intentions of the film. All his possible kindness, their legitimate attempt that seems cinema of quality, is hampered by a drama sometimes impostado by characters that sobreactúan or by certain concatenation of situations that inevitably lead to a conclusion that is already scheduled to within minutes of film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/766

Hartigan

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

Agile and dynamic, but in its claim to cover everything becomes sharp.

The figure of Goya and his vital career, above the other artists, has attracted the eye of important authors. In the theater Buero Vallejo spent the sleep of reason and Carlos Saura made Goya in Bordeaux in 1999. To them they were joined by the Czech Milos Forman, director of legendary titles as someone flew over the nest of the cuckoo and Amadeus and whose last two movies, the scandal of Larry Flint and Man on the Moon, used the biopic genre to bring into play the social controversy environment issues as individual freedom from the provocation. So, the first thing that surprises of Goya's ghosts is Biographical paragraph is relegated to the background: it is not the person of Goya, their conflicts as man and artist, which focused the film, but that is a character only tangentially involved in the events. Which is not to say that Goya does not paint anything in this film: pint, and much. In fact paints it all. Your look is which gives sense to the story, which reveals their flashes of beauty and its depths of horror. His eyes and his brush, the only thing that keeps you tied to the world after suffering a deafness which has paradoxical biblical punishment dyes. It is the witness that puts voice to the innocent, "the flowers crushed by the chariot of reason" which spoke of Hegel in his fight against obscurantism. Another thing is that the value of this look is lost in the abstruse adventures of the main plot and the sometimes hasty pace of the film. The young Agnes, daughter of a wealthy merchant and Muse of Goya, striking a night of the Holy Office to not wanting to eat suckling pig in a tavern. He confesses under torture be judaizante and his father, in an attempt to free her, get Goya make an appointment with the brother Lawrence, with whom Goya is painting the picture and is responsible for the resurgence of the activity of the Inquisition. During that night, the family of INES used their own weapons against Lorenzo from which derive an absurd signed confession to him blackmail so intercede for his daughter. The "intercession" by Lorenzo just resulting in pregnancy of Agnes and the ruin of this that must go into exile. Twelve years later French troops occupy Spain, eliminate the Inquisition and Goya is reunited with a shattered Inés physical and mentally by his confinement and a Lorenzo converted into champion of the revolutionary and rational principles imposed by Napoleon to blood and fire.The thesis of the film is clear: both obscurantism and why drag his step innocent victims that nobody remembers. Power games are simple permutations of the same elements. The sleep of reason produces monsters. There is a real love for the work of Goya plastically reflected in this film, in the scenic reproduction of their whims. Something similar to what we saw in Alatriste, escenas-cuadro: in this film, however, are inserted with a much better sense of the opportunity. Do not be límitan to see: mean. However, something which "sings" greatly is the adultearación of original paintings so that they have the face of the actors. For example, the equestrian portrait of Queen María Luisa with the face of Blanca Portillo (magnificent on the other hand in their short speeches) is a blunder that stripping the film integrity. It seems that the director has become enmeshed in the mechanisms of the transition from reality to fiction, and in its intention to show Goya as a painter who makes works "too real" has ended up doing things that are directly false, both inside and outside the film. A Goya paints false works of Goya is a false Goya.Lo same is true for the rest of the film language. The film is agile and dynamic, but in its claim to cover everything becomes sharp. Twelve years pass from one scene to another. The characters appear and disappear without just transitions. This lack of subtlety gives the main plot the pretext of vaudeville who both have criticized you, with mothers, fathers and daughters that appear and disappear. In the height of clumsiness, Natalie Portman plays simultaneously the mother and daughter. Despite transformations truly impressive physical suffering actress, the parallel is blatant, even more when the good of Natalie does not have a variety of records. Outside these exits of tone, sharing works in an exemplary fashion and we must praise the roundness of the characters. Bardem, another guy that also stands out for its versatility, manages to give the entire extent of the vileness, while Michael Lonsdale as Grand Inquisitor is the perfection of the perversity without histrionics. Randy Quaid as Charles IV appears to leave the original brushstrokes of Goya to give them life in four exactísimos strokes. Finally - there will be have on this point, as it usually happens with the heads of cast - Stellan Skarsgård makes a great Goya. Not only by his physique that seizes the scenes by its intensity but to establish the dualism of the character, a Goya at first surprised by his debonair character and clumsy, but just leading to the bleak tragic sense of the author of the vagaries. It is not enough, however, to make a round film Goya's ghosts. The confusing pace and the tone that passes from melodrama to comedy in such a way that it seems sometimes accidental (particularly in the case of the interpreter of Goya, whose gestures move laughter even in the most dramatic scenes) tarnished its bright color.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3811

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

The Fall

muchocine

A magical, beautiful film and whose positive message is able to encourage him to one day. We need more movies like this in the rooms.

He has won the award for best film at the Sitges festival, ahead even of the masterpiece "[Rec]" (which, Yes, has won the great general of the year). Its director, Tarsem Singh, was unveiled with "The cell", endless beautiful invoice pestiño, in addition to having shot video clips as incredible as "Losing my Religion", rem. With "The Fall" has remedied his mistakes, convincing with an attractive, and emotional story that hooks and falls in love with, and again, an infinite formal beauty.The premise is simple. A girl is recovering in a hospital. There, he meets a double actor, also entered and forced to save bed, tells a series of stories of adventurous Court, which they unleashed the imagination of the protagonist, and make dream awake and let fly his mind towards these magical places to listen to.Read the summary, it is hard not to think in other similar films that always have been appearing on the screens of film, with greater or lesser success. The most recent, "Big Fish" and "El Laberinto de el Fauno", are almost the same, but luckily, the two pale (especially the second) before "The Fall".And it is that where these fail, by the excessive weight of the imaginary aspect ("Big Fish") or realistic ("the labyrinth."), Tarsem achieves a balance more than remarkable, preventing his film fall into the shallowness of the previous. And harder still, despite its two-hour, "The Fall" does not fall never in the tedium, becoming an entertainment from beginning to end. I don't want to say that your pace is endiablado, he is not an epic movie or anything. But yes administered doses of drama and adventure with intelligence, exciting or fun when the situation requires and avoiding the Viewer to take any look at your watch.This task (the lower the gaze) extremely complicated, because as I say, the beauty of each of its levels, from the most intimate to the most overwhelming, is infinite. Tarsem runs as if paint paintings, for him there cannot be anything that clash on the canvas. "Beautiful photographs of impossible landscapes are interspersed as well with the colorful costumes of the various characters, melting in a tremendously addictive, almost perfect harmony.""The Fall" is therefore an incredible Ode to the joy of living. A magical, beautiful to the eye and rewarding movie in the soul, whose positive message is able to encourage him to one day. I do not want to say much more because I believe that I have already unveiled quite its charm, and think that it is a film of these that is worthwhile to discover during your viewing. I will only say that they need more like this in theaters

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2001

JLO

Colateral

muchocine

The whole forms a product active and attractive view, with a promising start that is blurring with passage of minutes.

Michael Mann's collateral nude with clarity all the vices and virtues of his filmmaker. Mounting attractive touching TV, with attractive and different textures. Realism in scenes involving bullets (remember the previous Heat) and a hyphen well built with a tendency to the excessive accumulation of dialogues. Mann simepre hits with the soundtrack and incidental music. The characters stereotyped (bad/good) that with the passage of the tape and own knowledge, reveal more similarities than differences.In his previous films, these ingredients were already included (the series Miami Vice, fire on fire, the informant, Ali), all of them in greater or lesser measure made films but in this are noticed more clearly, as if Mann did and wanted to always improve the same movie.The whole forms a product active and attractive view, with a promising start that is blurring with passage of minutes. Characters are implausible, played situations are Ditto but this if it is not a defect, the lack of logic is supplied with passion and an empathy which never comes and this Yes becomes a defect that will ruin the film.Praise to Tom Cruise in his first role "bad" are not free, but the less excessive sound. Meets without overact is not little therein but years light of their best three works: the soldier of born on the fourth of July, long-suffering Dr. Haltford's eyes well closed and the misogynistic and attractive Frank Mackey from Magnolia. Collateral in short is a film that fluctuates between indifference and sin if not what might have been. As heard passing out of the film: did me nothing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2450

Kiko de España

Death Proof

muchocine

Do absolutely delusional with great dialogue, and above all, better persecution of cars seen in years in a movie theater, and that it's a sequence? classical and analog?, as the persecutions were shot 30 years ago.

Difficult to focus on something concrete to discuss the latest furor of Quentin Tarantino, Death Proof, and that always is good. I will leave aside the trailers, the double programme and all what is Grindhouse, not only because it was a historical bump on American soil (incomprehensible, would add) but because even beyond the double programme will be maintained and they reestrenarán both movies like that in Europe, in a director´s cut. In other words, because Grindhouse has been a dream that once we dream, but to awaken what we had were each movie separately. It has been both what we have heard these months with regard to the film event of the year (I personally put it above Transformers, pirates, etc) this is cinema that I will try to be clear now that we have seen a pass organized by the people of Aurum, its distributor in Spain. At the height of expected: outstanding.Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russell Ma-gis-tral) is a psychopath son of a bitch that runs along the roads with their racing car, a true killing machine, in search of girls to assassinate and, if they are well good, so much better. The girls are spectacular is normal in a movie of these characteristics, what is not normal is that friend Quentin has so many handsome contacts, because Miss Poitier (do go? legs!), Rosario, Zoe or Mary Elizabeth are they sparkle. Absolutely hilarious, with a few great dialogues (despite some serious kind claiming inconsequential, only as you look at it), and above all, better persecution of cars seen in years in a movie theater, and that that is a "classical" and"analog" sequence, as the persecutions were shot 30 years, something should learn the Wachowskifor example. Course, meta-realidades (the character of the Dawson takes "ringtone" "Broken nerves" of Herrman which already used Tarantino at his Kill Hill), shootings of films, a new dance to remember (rather more subidito tone than that of Travolta and Uma, or Michael Reservoir Madsen) and an absolutely timeless atmosphere eventually materialize in a perfect wayso foolproof, I fear not, because we are one of the great films of the year, but a reality test of any doubt, because many frega you in that goal, for many favors you do, by many garbage in which his name appears (eye, any Hostel or Running Scared would there), Quentin Tarantino is one of the guys with more talent that has given the American film in, its history? Death Proof is the debut of Tarantino as director of photography, and all I can say is that you note of Knoxville has worked with types such as Robert Richardson (do Kill Hill, the Aviator, JFK?) and that he has seen a lot, probably all, the slasher and acquired giallos and for having an encyclopedia on "as light a good movie of series B / Z". Another (very) important point lies in his filmography (for what was to be less?) with the music that accompanies the images, and Death Proof starts with a theme of Jack Nietzsche entitled The Last Race, there is nothing. Then I say, the best DJ of Hollywood is recreated as it did from Pulp Fiction, both in the music and images. Ah, by the way, before concluding I would like to stress that the better and more badass car wreck lives of middle, cinematically speaking, in recent times, is in Death Proof. And the end is simply unforgettable and memorable. The only negative note will be the question of the fake trailers, because it would be a pity to miss them and at the moment we have no official news (1), only the rumor that Planet Terror, which I have not been able to see in its extended version (but it is a sufficient zany retro-pulp with many good moments, but there is the problem, is a film 100 hundred Rodríguez)(, with which this entails for better and for worse) it will come with the Machete, directed by Rodriguez himself and that it could stretch until the long. Other titles are:-Werewolf women of the s.s. (by Rob Zombie) - Don? t (by Edgar Shaun of the Dead Wright and a narrative of "Arrested Development" Will Arnett that will make you cry with laughter)-Thanksgiving (by Eli Roth, an outstanding job.) (And gorno, of course) thanks, Quentin, thank you.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2295

Oscar Cantero

Corazones solitarios (Lonely Hearts)

muchocine

A missed opportunity to revitalize a dying genre; inexplicably, but dying.

The abandonment to which has been subjected for decades the film noir by the industry, is something that I have never right to understand. The films of this genre, when done well, dazzle to the public, and become reference and cult films for many.Lonely hearts tells the story of two killers who acted in the middle of the last century and dedicated to seducing ladies and solitary wealthy then kill them and steal them. But what could be a good story has been little more than anything because of lack of expertise of its director Todd Robinson, has not managed to create the atmosphere needed to catch the Viewer, or has performers that make up the cast to represent roles or to convey the slightest sense to a viewer that little more than endure the time can make credible.The fact that nothing more start appears telefílmico "based on actual events" banner already portends the worst, because rarely worth what comes after him; and of course, this is not the exception that proves the rule. A displaced John Travolta, shielded by a untapped Gandolfini and one misguided Salma Hayek, nor contribute to improve the final product, which strikes as vacuous and lacking in the necessary push to revitalize a genre once hailed. The fact that the own Distributor has postponed its release on several occasions is clear sample of the lack of interest in promoting a gender phagocytosed and marginalized by an industry geared to exploit the only commercial aspect of cinema, without taking into account and without remembering that all the successes are usually preceded by a good job.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1771

Alex Largo

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

Overall the film is excellent. In all cases. The direction, the soundtrack, the actors, the production design... All. We can blame you the tape only some other hole (actually there is only one, but it is a gap).

Not liked anything what director Alfonso Cuarón did with the third novel in the Harry Potter series. This is my fine way of saying that not him I forgave the mess, the attack, the maiming of "Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban". What is more, when I left the room I said to myself. "I will not watch one movie of this man". But of course, "do not say this water will not drink". So, encouraged by the critical acclaim that had made the tape, and the poor acceptance of the American public. I said: "because it has to be well." "I spend a day and her rent". And that is what I did.I got the disc into the DVD reader. I sat down. I waited that pass through the announcement of "LA PIRATERIÍA is A crime". I gave "Languages". I gave to "English". I gave "Subtitles". I gave "Spanish". And then. I did. I gave him to "Film". We say that (catch-up, since that is always the family asks that you "and that cloud of what?" and other eloquent questions that they leave the soul to some people) occurred. Only that. It passed before my eyes. When started (accompanied by the question of my companion "then go end shit, not can finish there.") ("Second party huh?") credits I could not feel more satisfied. And it is that the film is worth the trouble.Overall the film is excellent. In all cases. The direction, the soundtrack, the actors, the production design. All. We can blame you the tape only some other hole (actually there is only one, but it is a gap). Though don't know if these errors come from the novel on which it is based (if so should be having remedied) or are adaptation (an unforgivable error). And it is that the only thing that it lacks the script. Why? For what?. In no time, Cuarón (architect of the script) are worthy to answer these two questions. It is not that they are very necessary, but your response is missing. But we know that this man, what brings you to give explanations without care. Something that left us very clearly in the third part of "Harry Potter". And that is something I hate. You can not you just tell a thing without saying the why, you have to give the reasons why your story is as it is, and occurs as it does. Still, Cuarón complies to charm his work of director. A compliment that I never imagined I would say. What actors are concerned, they all meet their work more than, and more than one, you have fallen one or two awards. Include Clive Owen, which is sometimes somewhat deadpan, but gives us in a few moments a brilliant performance; Michael Caine, who gives us the best character of the tape and that unfairly not has been rewarded his work with any prize.Other highlights are the magnificent band Sonora of John Travener and photography, which has several awards, although the Oscar slipped from her hands. The film is shot in documentary form, as if the camera outside a journalist that records everything (even you jump blood to the camera). In general: a film to enjoy and to think. With some excellent parts, a production design breathtaking. The film is quite good, and enjoys an incredible moment more than one (and more than two, and more than three.) so that the GLUGs tears skip you.Also we must recognize him to the film the very successful critique of society, and it is that there are many parallels between that reality (for some strange reason we think something distant) and ours. A faithful portrait of the world of as it is today. What is more, almost a rebuke. That never comes over.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2522

Tito Chinchan

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

Essential movie in its genre. By far, the best of the series.

Before you start with criticism, rather the bathroom of praise of the film, said that with Harry Potter nor am I nor I will be objective in life. I have read and re-read all the books. I have deleted the bytes of the DVDs of the times that I've seen, and I've been expelled from forums for criticizing aspects I liked or that have not been rounded. So, if you are looking for a sincere review, where you critically have the film, long passes. I would begin an arm before you criticize the peliculón I of ver. 24 of the night of July 19, 2007. Again the film with his eyes still drenched with emotion. I doubt that you can best start on my birthday. I am in front of the computer with a small glass (of paint) whisquito that has left shivering the Glenrothes. I meditate two or three seconds what I am about to say. I remember the entry into cinema. As I cried, I laughed, I am excited, I pulled popcorn at the screen, and I has not missed the usher for that there is no such figure in modern theaters. Than 20 rather exploited euros, so the popcorn were tasty just point of salt.The film is a teenage kid that is magician, not as the Tamarisk, if not rather throwing Merlin. Not giving to be a teenager, already quite problematic, it is also an orphan, why their parents mato les a more evil dark magician that quina. Total, that Harry and his cousin les attack some bad bugs like black ghosts called Dementors. As our hero drives away them, is judged by magic and seems that you can not attend the magical school. Well, and then they go to so many things interesting and vibrant that I soon cut a finger that reveal them. Or not?Today we have changed the usual format of criticisms of nonsense - synopsis - comments - summary, one more extensive. Let's see, the film I has enthused, and that the book seemed very weak, with some sub-plots (such as the Dolores in height) that I people bored Presidency and put bad milk. Here nothing from that. Pretty solid, without the usual gaps, and very consistent with the general history has created a script. Earthly problems take weight, while the classes lose it, very unfortunately. But has not lost that touch that was lost in the fourth installment of splash each frame with a magical flowers, subtle. Despite perfectly know me the history, and as he was going to conclude, as if he knew nothing of the history have vibration. Maybe he had to see that you expected me a flojota movie. I am glad to have gone with this mindset. Let's see the characters (sorry for me that I do not lift looking for the book to make the names well) Moon Lovegord. Damn that girl faintness, more hits in movies of fear. It has been hovering between give fear and give a lot of penalty. They could have made a tad more cheerful, that it seemed that you owed him money for the writer.Dolores Umbridge. As he imagined. For kicking him in the intestines until leaving him by the mouth. That tirría that have it, by God. I am grateful that they have cut their torture.Bellatrix. After having seen in the films of Tim Burton, the truth that not him it hit much the role of bad very bad. Although Act well, that I would not dare to deny it.Voldemort. He has grown the nose to this boy? More evil than evil.Longboton. Fuck that most heinous child. As in the last book does not change will be the most absurd character ever invented.Kracher (home Elf). As you imagined. A little more of prominence it had not been wrong.The said. Made me one out black, given that in the books never mention race (thing that feel me great). It has made me funny not to be black, if not for the strange role that they have given, entirely on fill. The girl who changes her hair made me laugh much the moment of glory that has.Dumbledore. This man has less glamour and presence to the mats for the tele of crochet. Why it takes a serviletero in the beard? Removing that, a crack total and more stylish than the host. OLE by him.Hagrid. Her scene with the giant reminded me the cat of the this movie of animation of a green OGRE (not put names of other movies that does not give me the win). Little paper.The giant. They have changed you, very rightly in my view, the role he had in the book. I made him as much more horrible, and at the end is a good-natured of care.Ron and his brothers. Very good the final scene of the brothers, although it has varied with respect to the book (which feel me sorry for her was not able to imagine reading it). Ron is much more mature as a person, always next to Harry.Hermione. That big is this girl I like. As always, giving the point of sanity, although it has been seen as less important in history. Say, that very well in his second discreet flat.Harry. Very well. Nothing more to say.Comment on something else, the patronus scenes have been very good, with much magic. The fighting has nothing to do with books, with a much more powerful good. In addition, the fight scenes are very successful and bestial. The apotheosis, and very sentimental, end with a Harry showing how wonderful that is friendship and family. Very curious House where meets the order, especially the scene in which enter it.In short, essential film in its genre. By far, the best of the series.And by that I do not have 6 stars.Besitos.P.D: If I had not to stir Rome with Santiago to to see her again, her would go to see it again tomorrow. I'll have to wait for the DVD and its good extras (I hope).Pd2: The beginning of the letter "Dear Canute" made me cry of laughter. It seemed that Harry Petas would make it the porros and dismissed in this way. Great name.P.D.3: It had never spent half an hour to criticism.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1054

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Dulce Emma, querida Bobbe

muchocine

Szabo cela lovingly Socialist culture, the legacy of the Russian school captured at levels fixed, short, the austerity of the props and, above all, true reconstitutivo affection by verbal on the iconic. Political cinema of much height.

From the outset, a warning. Sweet Emma, dear Bobe isn't film capitalized as it can be the grapes of wrath or psychosis or Casablanca or the tree of life. It is not a film that has marked a generation and then be marked to another. And what comes. Manifestly popular cinema is not which can hear at a table in a bar or in the Salon improvised on the tail of a film, but is film with uppercase and deserves the sentimentality of this vocational and passionate prose delivered for a while and the gentle reader foreign to the title can dive in film public or private archives to watch her. Repent not the slightest. Those who know (I saw in a pass from the glorious TVE 2 and now I have repescado her in digital format), as returns to its crude charm, but necessary. Splinters of the Socialist regime float over the pool and agujerean the raft in which trying to survive the teachers of a school. The line of flotacíón makes water and every future naúfrago crows knows to claim his portion of lifeboat. Emma, apart from the social revolution, concerned the sexual trade unionism and wanders the corridors of the public school of Budapest in which works lampando by brushing the Director: a cowardly, elusive, type stranded between marital fidelity and clandestine Vice Sin outside program. It is an easy woman, which aims to overcome a personal crisis surrounded by a crisis State, economic, political. in dreams, Emma falls as by a long embankment, naked, with the contracted face and mouth made a crooked, ugly gesture. Bobe is a Western, materialistic, spirit and lives his particular Odyssey of escalafonar and apply the carpe Latin diem to your book of savings with your vaginal solazo: becomes, bitch, and ends by throwing himself, in the end, from a third floor perhaps because it failed to respond to the strict observance of the classist regulation of entrenched communism of its Government. Szabo is a Hungarian director (Budapest, 1938) fully localize, but can recover the teen reads and write a film outside the narrative mechanism of European or American cinema that has tasted in its Westernization. There is no film correlation between this sweet emma, dear Bobe and his other films as the known appointment with Venus (Glenn Close) or Jan Hanussen (with his compatriot and friend Klaus Maria Brandauer, that we remember especially in out of Africa). Szabo cela lovingly Socialist culture, the legacy of the Russian school captured at levels fixed, short, the austerity of the props and, above all, true reconstitutivo affection by verbal on the iconic. An announcement of the time which premiered pointed out the idea that the film was the Thelma and Louis of the Eastern bloc. It is false. There is nothing of the sort. The Ridley Scott film moves to the public to identify gloriously with the women fled, seeking in particular escape an emotional hold his zarandeada life. The country in which they live goes well, reasonably well, clear. Hungary is not the United States of America. Sweet Emma, dear Bobe isn't a movie like that, feminist or slightly escorada a practitioner feminism: it is a sentimental Chronicle of the dsigregación of a way of life and how that fragmentation eventually destroy lots of lives that have failed (or not tried) to embrace the new militancy capitalist, modern, pop.The merit of Szabo (huge) is that it makes a film of domestic consumption that is clearly understood abroad: more in Europe than in the effervescent and watered-down Hollywood that does not see beyond their own garden. The Westernizers contours of the film (crowded tourists places, naked women for a film Arabist pass, the liberal and cosmopolitan talente of tolerant Bobe) articulate a window to look at to understand that the political reality of the countries of the East is not random work, but in this very complex plot also exercising its role values and behaviours of the West: the fair of the vanities that have become, for better, for worse, this side of the story. Twenty years later (or almost) the reading of the film is identical to early 1990s yawned when this awakening of the countries of the East to democracy and to the modern European life style, but now we know more and understand that the journey is worth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2127

Taliesin

Dungeons Dragons

muchocine

If you like the role, the fantasy film and dive into adventure in the style of the Lord of the rings, more better that you keep away from what is insurance one of the 100 worst films of the history.

Yesterday I felt a bit masochistic and myself to see a film that, even knowing that it was the worst, I woke up some unhealthy curiosity: Dungeons Dragons. The film is in the year 2000 and I remember the trailer had no bad paints, prompting many unwary pass through box office, with the consequent later casting. This is one of those occasions where the audiences and critics are agreed and with good reason. And it is that this movie is not bad, but very bad. The surprising thing is to discover Jeremy Irons in the cast and I guess, although it is true that many years ago that not catches a role in conditions, it should be drunk and drugged when he signed to make bad malísimo in this production is that worthless or of telefilm for the hour of the siesta.¿Y what is wrong with Dungeons Dragons? The first thing that comes to mind is the script, simplistic to the maximum and with zero interest. Scenes will chain is a few other bordering on the ridiculous. And if you thought that it can not stick to the funny black character who dies first in a film like this, you equivocabas. Is like painting sunglasses to the Mona Lisa, but it can. In any case, the problem is not the script. Or, better said, it is not only the script. It is an action-adventure film, but the action is of penalty and the adventure also. The characters, the start-up scene, special effects, the dialogues. everything is laughable for a film that apparently came with pretensions of overproduction. Scenarios, weapons and objects are a mixture of plastic and cardboard stone and the worst is that it shows. The costumes seem to they have taken them from a play of end of course or the nearest town costumes shop. It is as if the entire universe of D D buy her clothes in the store that the Robin Hood of Errol Flynn.Para make us an idea, the dialogues are at the height of the worst chapter in the fantastic car. Come on, that neither in a fantasy world of D d so bows can be. Bad, very bad and cruel, are idiots. And the good, apart from being idiots, are courageous and slaughtered. As already awning (feel annoy you a great movie like this), the funny black dies and it is assumed that it should be a penalty. In fact, want to applaud and all you ask is that, please, anyone know a spell of resurrection. By the way, that there is a magician in the Group and I think that it makes three different spells throughout the film. In fact, even dares with combat melee (should have gone the way of the funny thief).In summary, Dungeons Dragons is a set of nonsense at all levels and what should be an entertaining film more unpretentious turns into an hour and half unbearable without feet or head. Since then, little has this to do with D D and does not work or as a production of adventures. For the moment, we will have to make do with the animated series which is what more has come to what may be a game of role, and that it was not big deal.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1994

Tito Chinchan

Garganta profunda

muchocine

Legendary porn movie of a woman who has the clitoris in the throat. Hilarious situations and dialogues, takes us back to that absurd atmosphere of the 1970s. Recommended to have a good time, or even to be able to say "I have seen deep throat".

A few days ago we mentioned the documentary "Inside Deep Throat" that left me with the intrigue of seeing the film. Obviously a serious and formal man like I did not possess a copy, so I had to ask my usual pornographer I got me a copy. The copy I got in no more than six seconds. Thank God I asked him a digital version, if leave me DVD may that it had not been able to draw the movie of the apparatus, je, je.The film is a girl that does not reach orgasm. In his words, it has taste, but do not see rockets, not hear trumpets, or anything at all. So it gets in the hands of a psychiatrist rabigordo who discovers what his problem, which has the clitoris in the throat. That is why you have to reach orgasm through fellatio deep.My mother what I've been able to laugh. As porn movie the truth that is not worth a pepper, but it has sentences and scenes that are great. I swear that great. In addition to this, you can say that you have seen the most profitable movie in the history of cinema, and quedais as God. We could say that this film opened a genus, named with the same name, where currently there are true artists.In short, legendary porn movie of a woman who has the clitoris in the throat. Hilarious situations and dialogues, takes us back to that absurd atmosphere of the 1970s. Recommended to have a good time, or even to be able to say "I have seen deep throat".Besitos.Escenas and dialogues (more or less). ** "Do you mind if I smoke while I eat?" says one in what eat you the pipitilla.* "Do want to run you or mount a berbena?" in reference to the rockets that you want to see women protegonista.* "Imaginasé have the balls in the ears" and responds "well, oiré well as I run!".** The doctor said "It's amazing" and said it "Would have been someone the clock inside?"responds the doctor "has No!" and she says "women don't have badajo" ** mounted a party so that the girl can achieve orgasm. And how come so many are giving number at the entrance.As I said, great.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2305

Oscar Cantero

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

A superb film that manages to transport the Viewer to the decadent but haunting late 19th London.

In general, and although it is not very Orthodox, usually considered the presence of Michael Caine enough incentive to watch a movie, and to presuppose the film concerned a minimum in terms of script and interpretation. If to this we add that the rest of the cast members among is an increasingly more tanning Hugh Jackman, my interest increases even more.The final trick is one of those movies that one likes to see with time, relaxed, and taking a gin-tonic, enjoying every scene, every dialogue, each gesture, and above all, of a logradísima setting that transports you (in transport also helps the DRAM), old London of late 19th, decadent and spellbinding, while capable of embelesar.To the already highlighted grandeur of its interpreters (not to be forgotten, although brief and secondary, the emergence of Scarlett Johansson), and their scenarios, must add the absorption capacity of a script prepared lovingly in the details.But as nothing and nobody is perfect, The Prestige also suffers from defects. Starting with difficulties to clearly decide what to call it is The Prestige?, the prestige?, the final trick?, do the final trick, the prestige?. This indecision and complexity in the name, will cause that in the end, most end up referring to her as that film of magicians of Michael Caine, in which also left David Bowie (I forgot comment before the curious even little appearance of Bowie playing the mysterious Tesla).I would also say that it is not uniform in its pace, causing at times is a little lost interest and cost work maintaining attention. The truth is that these details, especially its Cadence, make this a film magnificent, but not exceptional. In any case, one of those movies that nobody should miss. Although for tastes the colors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2167

Matías Cobo

Más extraño que la ficción

muchocine

Marc Forster in his latest film proposes an interesting experiment: what would happen if the character in a novel were aware of being forming part of it?

Marc Forster (finding never ever Monster's Ball) proposed in his latest film premiered in Spain (stranger than fiction) an interesting experiment: what would happen if the character in a novel were aware of being forming part of it; and even more: what would try to make to avoid its sure death advanced by the voice of a narrator describing what is happening in his life and how much thought throughout the day with millimetric precision? This is the original knot of an enmarcable tape in the best version of American independent cinema. A splendid and content Will Ferrell is Harold Crick, the last character of the successful author Karen Eiffel (perfect Emma Thompson in the role of this eccentric character). In the work, Eiffel describes him as an official of Hacienda de Grey and methodical life until the day that meets the rebellious pastry Ana Pascal (magnificent Maggie Gyllenhaal). You must audit the young Pascal that, in his statement, it has ceased to pay some taxes arguing refusing to finance the wars of the bellicose American administration. Terrified by the end brought you the author of his book life, Harold will come to the aid of different professionals with mixed success. Psychologist Dr. Carly ('cameo' of luxury of the vanished Tom Hulce) recommends a holiday period, but little serves the Council to Harold, who voice him seems more plausible. Literature professor Jules Hilbert (Dustin Hoffman) will give the key to a solution: must guess if the story of his life is a comedy or a tragedy. In the first case is it saved, in the second, his death will be the sure epilogue. Fortunately for Harold, the novelist walks with some problems of creative block is solve an editorial assistant Penny Escher (Queen Latifah). While she elucidate how to kill him, Harold happen you events that will make you cling to life with an unsuspected force in someone like him.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3175

Rafa Delgado

El Orfanato

muchocine

It is true that the film used some topics of best horror movies, and drink of many films of the genre of reference, but 'The orphanage' works. And it does it very well.

Is true that I wanted to taste it, but did not expect much from the film debut of Juan Antonio Bayona, the orphanage. Nor is it that I had spoken very well from it, and I already feared me a disappointment. But it has been just the opposite.It is true that the film used some topics of best horror movies, and drink of many films of the genre of reference (the other, Poltergeist), but the orphanage works. And it does it very well.The script has seemed pretty good and be robust enough to withstand the envestidas of which tilden it of beans. The story is good and very well told, and in addition to the miedín that gives, is quite exciting and poignant. Bayonne shows us what is able to make one of the best works of Spanish completion of the year, maintaining tense the viewer into the more grisly moments, and making him jump seat when less it expected, in an effective and reassuringly terrifying manner (that long a horror film failed it really)kill them without having to resort to old tricks easy to raise the volume of the music with one blow to leave without timpanos viewers and, incidentally, of a heart attack. Three hundred souls who were in the room tonight with me, will attest.The soundtrack of Fernando Velázquez, by the way, quite pretty, and fulfill its role perfectly: accompany images, history, and strengthen his soul.The orphanage also has a very interesting cast is excellent: going through the child protagonist, Roger Prince; by a few anecdotal, but correctísimos Montserrat Carulla and Fernando Cayo, until a Geraldine Chaplin to gustísimo in a role that comes as the ring finger, and a Belén Rueda that surprises us with a wonderful interpretation, that you could well have its first Goya for best main actress of the year (remember that the Goya has already won for best actress by - that picture is not for both-Mar adentro).Some Cape loose plot (although unimportant), and the fact that many elements of the film are the result of a cocktail of best horror movies, make the orphanage does not take a score of honours.And before concluding, I would like to comment on the outstanding advertising campaign that has had the movie. Being Spanish, surprise me very much, and I am glad that finally a patriotic film product is publicized as it deserves, and the results are only look out the nearest cinema and see people coming to see the movie. That Spanish producers learn from the orphanage. I foresee a considerable international success for this film. In addition, I am not surprised nothing to take a corner at the next ceremony of the Oscar.Que, by the way, the Yankee who have already purchased the film rights to his own remake are so original. No comment.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1248

Yojimbo

Plan oculto

muchocine

The film is a fun and exciting story of robbers and police. Highly recommended to spend a good bit of quality.

Recently we could read that the new film by Spike Lee had been number one at the American box office. The first taquillazo of this "independent" director. Well, yesterday I could attend the preview of this film, by invitation and thank you in greatly to my friend of Vigo;) Inside Man (horrifyingly here entitled hidden Plan) could qualify as one of these turns of some directors such personal as Woody Allen with his Match Point or Cronenberg with A history of violence. They are directors (or authors, for those who prefer a "European" touch) that provided its style and showed his talent in films that could be called gender and extremely attractive. They are also a confirmation of the versatility of these filmmakers.Because the new Spike Lee film is the police project. And the truth is always appreciated the hand of someone who has style for this kind of stories. The plot begins when the character of Clive Owen plans a robbery at a bank. But it is a perfect plan. Obviously does not know anything about this plan. Denzel Washington is an inspector who touches him to deal with the situation, the bank robber has hostages. Willem Dafoe is the head of special forces and works closely with him. However the owner of the Bank, Christopher Plummer, wants to regain some of that branch and so sends to a mysterious and attractive Jodie Foster.La film is a fun and exciting story of robbers and police. Why fun? Because there are moments of genuine humor that sadly it can be real. It gives the feeling. On the other hand relies on stereotypes of the mugger Calculator but not all bad and the police honest, naive and something tontines. The interpretations are more than correct, although the character of Owen should be more frustrating because just the face is seen during the film. A hallmark of cinema?But something interesting and exciting as the robbery of a bank hostage, the film happens to have moments of irregular rhythm. On the other hand, can not miss the social criticism of Lee with minifrases and protest minipersonajes, but well, we know that with money you can take any speech and go on anything.For not disclosing anything important, film, which lasts two hours and little, takes a turn in the final half-hour which aims to make sense of what happened. The end is "moderately" surprising, right and at the height of this type of films that aims to provide a plot surprise. This what you get? with some other but. There are still many questions and doubts, especially the character of Owen, but actually gives a bit just because the writer prefers to portray the real evil in this story of little subtle but clear way for the Viewer. One may terminate the film a little fly and dissatisfied, but the balance will be positive because that has seen has the hand of Lee and has signed a more than decent entertainment.A highly recommended movie to spend a good bit of quality. Eye music Terence Blanchard (the John Williams of Spike Lee): his online very but very interesting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1104

Tito Chinchan

El próximo Oriente

muchocine

Delicious comedy that will make you laugh, suffer, mourn, excite you and give free rein to your emotions without any problem. Shows us that they aren't needed large deployments of media, nor actors of renown for making great films. We love it.

The Billboard is like a box of chocolates, always you you eat first those who do not bring wrapper and are more attractive, for at the end, when only remain those of rectangular and bland wrapper you have no other who taste them. The film this is the same, I have not seen any promotion of it, passing on tiptoe to egregious truño of attractive appearance, but since then that batters them with virulence. My recommendation, veanlá, film or video store, but veanlá, in company or alone, but do me case and vedla, insurance that you like.The film is about a type is called Caín who lives in a downtown neighborhood in a big city, which has seen its population has gone from being an aging colony Spanish to a Symphony of immigrants from various countries with their cultures and traditions. Cain is fat, good-natured, something alelado, butcher and a perfect loser. On the contrary, he has a brother named Abel which is just the opposite, a winner of the living married with two daughters, that in a slip leaves Muslim a girl pregnant and women who loved Caín. For more mess, this is neighbor of Cain. Total rejects that as Abel, this is suicide, moment in which her family discovers that she is pregnant. Cain, to safeguard his brother, decides to tell everyone that he is the father and assume with everything.Look, I'm not film wise, nor practically have no idea of it, but only is if it ends a movie and we got up dancing to the sound of the soundtrack, laughing and jumping, meaning that the film has delighted us (or that we we smoked a SPLIFF giant, which is not the case). It has the freshness of the films of Spanish comedy, but which were before, without great pretensions than show us a little story, insignificant to the evolution of humanity, but us cala in the depths of the heart. I do not think that the director intends to show a picture of immigration in Spain far, simply tells a modern story, and currently there are immigrants living among us. And more and more, so you can count stories such as these, in which cultures mingle and ways of seeing the world with the greatest possible purity.In short, delicious comedy that will make you laugh, suffer, mourn, excite you and give free rein to your emotions without any problem. Shows us that they aren't needed large deployments of media, nor actors of renown for making great films. We love it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/755

Francisco Bellón

Scoop

muchocine

The ingenuity of Allen is evident from the foreground of the film until the last, causing real attacks of laughter and uncontrollable laughter. Scoop is a new genius of one of the greatest masters of comedy and cinema.

True to its annual event, with the first cold of winter comes to Spanish screens new film of one of the most loved and recognized in our country foreign filmmakers: Woody Allen. His last works, especially Match Point though without forgetting everything else and Melinda and Melinda, away from the more recognizable Allen, ironic and sarcastic. Four years after A Final Made in Hollywood, Woody Allen returns in its purest form, with a comedy which will delight any good amateur to the seventh art.Sondra Pransky (Scarlett Johansson) is a young journalism student that passes the holidays in London. There, a night will attend the spectacle of Sid Waterman, "Splendini" (Woody Allen), who will choose it for one of their numbers, the "dematerializer". While Sondra expected, appears the spirit of Joe Strombel (Ian McShane), journalist of recently deceased prestige, who informs him of a great exclusive. There are few things more fun in this world who see a genuine and inimitable film of Woody Allen, and Scoop is part of the standard. If you need to compare ' Scoop ' with other tapes of Allen, it slightly reminds this jewel that is Manhattan murder mystery. The ingenuity of Allen is evident from the foreground of the film until the last, causing real attacks of laughter and uncontrollable laughter. If the script is full of subtlety and fine irony marks House, the work of direction that develops Allen is as always impeccable, carrying the story at its own pace precise, without slowness and crashes, something which often suffer the current comedies.And as also comes standard in his films, Allen brings out the best of its performers, including himself, with his mere presence already it takes one smile. Scarlett Johansson, the new Muse of filmmaker, shows that in the comedy it unfolds as well as in the more dramatic role, although Hugh Jackman him nor lags behind, to the positive surprise of many. In short, Scoop is a new genius of one of the greatest masters of comedy and cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1536

Rafa Ferrer

La noche de los girasoles

muchocine

Opera prima Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo is a wide, in all its splendor film, where a few open frames it almost at the same time, dan shelve, one by one without leaving a loose.

Spanish film from time to time puts us in the mouth a few drops of honey, out of the hand of "torrents" and "Mortadelos" are great films like this that brings us, a story told to pieces, piece by piece, as in an imaginary puzzle, where a staff of familiar faces, the always excellent Celso Burogallo and Carmelo Gómez, Mariano Alameda and Cesareo Estevanez televisionnext to the beautiful newcomer Judith Diakhate, they compose a tape that although your argument is misleading (the horror announce seems a film "Monster") and not a tape of coincidences abound where things "normal" as the envy and the hatred in the villages, well know some of La Mancha, land of my mother's family.Something that caught my attention is that a Spanish film, is not "made in Spain" If you don't have your ration of sex or light clothing women, this is not an exception; (damage made to the film uncover, by Jove!).Opera prima Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo is a wide, in all its splendor film, where a few frames open almost at the same time, dan shelve, one by one without leaving a loose, and mira is difficult happen, since there is usually always a loose thread that desliar the Web.In short, a good Spanish movie, that from time to time be done patria to noses!!!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/985

Alberto Concepción

Brick

muchocine

Set of good intentions... it stays in that, in purpose.

From time to time, raises one sees what kind of film. It is likely that, or either commercial (although many times is often confused with conventional) either 'of the understood'. I'm not who go to mess with the personal way that each have see movies. But after (I) given a chance with Brick, think that this short introduction has enough to do. Brick is an unconventional film. Of these intended to (especially intended to) be not only a film. And this is very bien.hasta some point. Brendan is a fairly atypical student (he and his entourage) received an unexpected call from his ex-girlfriend, Emily, of which virtually nothing known. But we do know that she is dead. In this way, the film shows that resulted in her first scene, to return two days ago, tell all? What has happened and the final consequences. Look good, right? To me also. But it is that, on the basis of this premise, the thing does not end March. And one knows when are ten minutes of tape: all is full of good intentions, and perhaps that which makes him to continue watching the rest of the (somewhat excessive) footage. But it is wrong. Or perhaps marche with that slight feeling of permanent casting. In my case, I have it clear: the cause of this run-rún of my brain was seeing too many elements 'for connoisseurs', with a not too defined and insufficiently clarifying rhythm: an 'aura of postmodernism' I did not finish curdling. I like to occasionally leave a stream of fresh air that prevents that the air vicie too in this film: how many times you said: ' go, what typical!, and you've complained about something so when you see a movie? Probably this not you go with Brick. But also it is likely let you something indifferent, unless you're a understand or want to be him (although in this latter case, within tí know definitely he is not so). That Yes, I like to be the idea that the film is bad. Because it is not. At all. It has its virtues (originality, different approach), but perhaps not sufficient as so that run-rún continue playing. In addition, interpretations can be liked by many, although they do not pass the simple 'meet'. Ultimately, the film debut of Rian Johnson holds promise. It has perhaps been too pretentious to be 'different' or alternative; or it has failed to bring us into the history of the most appropriate way. If what is rewarding are the ideas, then bravo. I only hope that, with some more experience, this director (who is also a screenwriter of the film) trusty us good movies. I trust in this, because talent is no doubt that it has.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1643

Rafa Ferrer

Casino Royale

muchocine

Your script will delight lovers of action cinema, since it presents all the ingredients for not leaving anyone indifferent, and as varied scenes and already classic of the 007 saga that is impossible to forget what we have before our eyes.

Taking advantage of its output on DVD I used to watch her back, it is curious that one when it envisages for the second time a film is can stop in scenes that previously left pass and even deepen elsewhere, in one way or another, had no relevance than previously thought.I'm still thinking that Eva Green, with his interpretation of Vesper Lynn, fails to give any entity such as Bond girl, leaving light years from any which previously were the most famous in the world of the celluloid 007 agent partner.Daniel Craig with his bond is the archetype of the character that we know now, giving a dimension different from the 007 classic, this bond is hard, little thuggish and more enamoradizo than the old.On the other hand, his script will delight lovers of action cinema, as it presents all the ingredients for not leaving anyone indifferent, and as varied scenes and already classic of the 007 saga that is impossible to forget what we have before our eyes.Curious, on the other hand, the scene of the game of Poker, where planning and his excellent shooting manages to remain in tension into something very trivial, as it is a game of chance.Sincerely, a tape that deserves one viewing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1585

Ana

La ciencia del sueño

muchocine

The science of sleep has a very personal magic, does not resemble any other thing. It seduces with its peculiarities are not perfect and his experiments of a rather emotional narrative.

Texture of dreams made from things of every day with peculiarities, such as the material of the boxes for eggs or the cardboard toilet paper tube. The science of sleep this made of rare, but real things of every day. Michel Gondry has great sensitivity to find these fantastic things and then to interweave them in a narrative that goes between the real and the dream without making much difference. When is a dream and when life itself seems nightmare?The past two films by Gondry made them from the hand of screenwriter Charlie Kaufman (Being John Malkovich), who always tends to these mind games between twist realidad-ficción. Still in the science of sleep displays many items that they have in common, but the ingenuity of Gondry is more organic than the Kaufman and even arguably less mathematically cold. In the narrative of this film not everything is perfectly clear, nor clearly necessary, but it works.Gael García Bernal in the title role that their dreams are presented as if outside his own TV show, Stephan TV still thus, neither dreams nor reality come to be what he would like. This film is must much interpretation of Bernal maintained between panegyrics and calm, without becoming stay short at one end or the other. Stephan comes France Mexico for work that got him his mother which is supposedly creative but in reality is basic and very boring. His French is not very reliable so it oscillates between the English to be understood, and the Spanish for a moment of true desperation. Adding to the general confusion and the peculiar texture of the film.The science of sleep has a very personal magic, does not resemble any other thing. It seduces with its peculiarities are not perfect and his experiments of a good emotional narrativamás. A joyful tragedy which is quite an experience for the senses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1918

Andrés Pons

Los Abandonados

muchocine

Maybe it's the premiere more worthy of the Spanish terror of recent years. Nacho Cerdá must keep track

Nacho Cerdá came as a hurricane in the scene Spanish in the 1990s with shorts as "Aftermath" or "Genesis" becoming part of the bunch of promising young Hispanic horror. Even considering director of worship.Later its name was beginning to forget after not getting a debut which many fans hoped.After almost two decades of waiting it was announced trumpeted his highly anticipated debut in the hands of julio Fernández that practically is the King of the production of Spanish terror now "Let us not forget all the titles of the Fantastic Factory". With all these ingredients fans to the genre can also celebrate the inclusion in the script of the Martian "Karim Hussain" "Totally unclassifiable titles like"Subconcious Cruelty or Abscension"creator." Authentic delusions for tanned bellies.An estimate where virtually the entire weight of the action lies in two unknown Czech actors.Anastasia Hille "actress already tanned on terror with small collaborations on each other or The Hole" or Karel Rolden "Also." specialized in fantasy with interventions in the films of Guillermo del Toro Hellboy, El Laberinto del Fauno"The abandoned is a technically flawless film, a photograph magnificent, great atmosphere and with a really anthological director camera handling.Frank horror moments while they mingle with a script sometimes little clear, medium footage lapses throughout the tension created at an alarming rate to return to lift the flight at the last minute.The work of their interpreters is another point in their favor. Whatever the case and notwithstanding some imperfections the debut of filmmaker as soon as less hopeful, where it shows that that is known the terror and knows all their springs. Maybe it's the premiere more worthy of the Spanish terror of recent years. Nacho Cerdá must keep track. A 7.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2041

Luna

Un engaño de lujo

muchocine

Audrey Tatou returns to the romantic comedy, but this time not convinced. He will not like Audrey Tatou fans or lovers of romantic comedy...

Audrey Tatou, the intimate Amelie, abandons his disguise of dúlce and tender to embody a "devours men", a beautiful and cosmopolitan woman who uses men to give him money and a life of luxury. Everything is apparently well with her wealthy partner until that a shy hotel worker falls madly in love of it. As she leaves only with people of "high standing", this poses as billionaire. And as the truth is always way out in the light, when we discover the cake already we have the typical romantic comedy.Only that in this case the film does not work. The two protagonists characters lack the necessary charm that you believe their characters (and it is truly painful to see Amelie trying to be what is not, a she-Wolf with lots of curves). In fact there are until a nod to the film Jeunet, as Salvadori comes up go to the two protagonists to a motorcycle (does someone sound?).The realization of Salvatori is conventional and deconstructed and as I have already said the performances of the actors fail to help to fill the plot or rhythmic gap of this film.He will not like Audrey Tatou fans or lovers of romantic comedy. I forecast that it will last little in Billboard, when it release in June 2007.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2679

Bloody Will

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

The fantastic four and Silver Surfer? It is the definitive adaptation of a comic paper to the screen: easy script, recklessness plot, special effects proper and not suitable for lovers of the deep characters. Do to my I jumped the tears?

We have here another big bet of the Marvel after?Spider-Man 3 ′, and another controversial no doubt. Authentic frightens write opinions on this kind of movies because it joins same and film buff tastes, and it matters little whether you like Ford western, the visual impact of Tim Burton or the drama of Aronofski, that if you give superheroes to navigate you stay stunned. Of course, there are superheroes and superheroes but since that Singer and Raimi auparan mutants and newspaper to the heavens the rest is target of fierce criticism.Do I assume my own contradictions: could see?Daredevil? other two hundred times more and vomitaría if I find it again?Ghost Rider? on my way. So I do not do case if you prefer, but as a staunch fan of the comics of?The 4 F? Since that did not exceed the meter of height?The fantastic four and Silver Surfer? It is the definitive adaptation of a comic paper to the screen: easy script, recklessness plot, special effects proper and not suitable for lovers of the deep characters. Do to my I jumped the tears?Do if we went to the archives of the comic, and look at these numbers of? the f 4? pre-John Byrne will see that the scripts weren't anything out of this world, where everything is explained and repeated a hundred times, where Johnny a.k.a. torch was very cool, the thing only delivered firewood and villains fell with astonishing ease after some inventito pulled out at the last minute. The film is a calco and only missing Alba and Gruffrudd leaving the sandwiches of the mouth with the scarce three phrases that pronounced. But that's small change introduced by this sequel to its predecessor, and is that if someone thought that the director intended to something serious to take the film to this family with superpowers, and was a tremendous disappointment, the sequel should be very prepared: this is A movie for children, of n-I - N-O-S!, not an essay about solitude because of stone, or the emotional catharsis involved burn in flames being sad and far less inconvenience to extend your body sometimes.Tim Story has decided not to be influenced by the line followed by many directors to take cinema superheroes always. Does Singer began providing to the?X-Men? of intensity in which combined action of Exchange supergolpes with loneliness and concerns of beings who were discriminated against for being different. Do is opening the door for Joss Whedon ended in shape permanently to the patrol X in the excellent collection?Astonishing X-Men?. Do after this, Singer went to?Superman? and it afforded the same clear and shadows with the unconditional love of Lois between stockings. Not to mention the Raimi of the first two installments of Spider-man, linking popcorn with a special script that showed what was Spidey: a loser whose fate is to be only. And you say Nolan, never saw a Batman so cojón **, pure Lord of the night. Do this to show you what is not?The 4 fantastic 2 ′, no more, no less. The historia-trama - script is simple not being able, specially designed to not confuse you at any time of what it is telling. The wedding of Reed Richards (Ioan Gruffudd) and Sue Storm (Jessica Alba) in sight, a threatening mysterious hangs over the planet, recorriendolo and causing various anomalies that satisfyed the attention of heroes. When they finally encounter the powerful Silver Surfer must join forces with a newly awakened enemy (McMahon) to avoid what is coming: the Devourer of worlds called Galactus.Con some new hue, and an update of our times, will see a version in this sequel of?Do The Coming of Galactus?, history of three numbers (# 48-# 51) beyond published by 1960s featured for the first time in the comics silver stele and Galactus, two characters who have survived to the present day in the adventures of Richards and company. Removing a couple of characters that at this stage do not paint anything and removing some cosmic references, the Fox and Tim Story have reduced everything to a basic scheme: the f 4 meets S.Surfer, S.Surfer batters them, the f 4 discovered as defeat him, and predictable final act. All seasoned with lots of action and much CGI, essential to make this a real blockbuster palomitero and little else.Perhaps I crucifiquéis by what I say, but this sequel surpasses the first part in everything. No longer are the characters, so save us the pain of the initial half-hour. Parade of the mythology of the series characters is exciting: Stela, Dr. death, Frankie Raye a.k.a. Supernova, the fantasticar, a Conatus of super-skrull and Galactus. There is no pretensions of hooked to an adult audience, only innocent fun, and humor, much more humor. Course, the scenes involving silver stele are what I, as a fan of these characters, I have been waiting for all my life: last genuine, and not because its special effects are innovative, but because I've been 20 years seeing it in crumpled paper. Being prepared for what is going to be once you sit in the armchair, everything works. Until raisins ignored the script written by Don Payne, which we already jo in a sticky ** with the libretto of?My super girlfriend?, and it was believed the very unlikable that it writes good. could have been a peliculón?, Yes, and that is the only thing that bothers me. A decent director and less clown this might have had something of a narrative quality, but is that Tim Story isn't Christopher Nolan, and or in his dreams could reach that level. Do so, with a very good basis the director is dedicated to put a stamp of?All the public? and how easy: not much dialogue, unnecessary scenes (the hen of Reed), children's jokes, a subplot of exchange of powers something stupid, and that you will never be forgiven: the appearance of Galactus. Without intent to annoy the only reason why some bring rooms to see this film, I must say attention SPOILER that we see the cabezón purple the end SPOILER giganton but for the rest of the treatment of such immense and promising character, Story can go to the very same ** · @! # **Do I already is what you're going to say of?The fantastic four and Silver Surfer?: is a very careful firecracker. Because, in many respects it is, why neither entered interpretations of Alba, Gruffudd, Evans or Chiklis, who are of school playground. Do do do so have involve this sequel in the list of? movies that everybody hates less I?, because I leave aside my critical sense, which says that the script is lousy and the history requetevista to embrace the kid loves?The 4 fantastic? Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, who has grown up with Mr. fantastic, Invisible girl, thing and torch faced death, Galactus or the skrulls, and sees all of them in action on the big screen. Do accordingly will leave orphan classification of? buena-excelente - bad-very buena-regular?What you want, of course I am going to buy the special DVD collectors of this sequel, but if I pick up a Tim Story I can kill him (figuratively, already I understand)?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1490

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

Clint Eastwood is a brave, honest, skillful and generously creative director but here it has squandered an excellent material to the not calibrate well a bland cast and a heavy mounting.

In the 98 Spanish Spain hurt: Clint Eastwood, in its own way, it hurts their country, and puts it in a politically heterodox way. The historical model supplied heroes, pride and honor is here modified. Flags of our fathers tacked a simple but hard nut to crack, plot which is not vindica the glory or advocates of the homeland they are called into question the reasoning that move a people to forge their myths and to lift, sometimes heroes beyond where there are only people struggling for ideals or, as they say in the filmby save or save those who have close.Though Iwo Jima today is the sign that indicates the beginning of the end of the fascisms, the film rescue what has not been or has been sesgadamente and contradicts (in an open and even blatant) textbook of school which has occupied for 60 years the desks in the United States of America Warhol wrote that there was no deeper than the surface itself. This is what Eastwood and his screenwriter Haggis (Crash, the last Bond) set: on the surface, the icon and his ancestral to Captivate and seduce and how this icon (the legendary image of the flag of bars and stars in the Suribachi mountain on the Japanese island of Iwo Jima) hides a sham.Photo of Joe Rosenthal, who died recently, burns in the hands of the people: the soldiers were others and explain themselves, the heroes are the wounded and the dead and those who were not limited to be commanded labour that needed all the help in the world because the mast that improvised weighed much, but the propaganda machine of precise heroes war and the Government of (first) Roosevelt and Truman (later) requires champions of the epic, soldiers complicit in the deception (which nailed the flag were others, and are no longer) willing to not disassemble the farce and motivate the American people to loosen the Pocket in war bonds. Truman asked 14 billion dollars in the period of two months: raised 27,000, which amounted to nearly half of the State budget in a year.Flags of our fathers is not a war epic, although images of field spare no showmanship and the director not be amedre to show the barbarism of war with gruesomeness several and little colorful details. Nor is it a film of patriotic style because the pattern to the use of good and bad that it fascinates all blind flags worshippers is not articulated. I remember now a joke of the broken in the country who came to say that all the flags of the world are manufactured in Hong Kong.Eastwood deconstructs the archetype of the hero: lowers it power tool to cajole the citizens and give them encouragement and legends in equal parts to the end that folklore was reconstituted and new generations have idolsicons and merchandising varied for the altar of dreams.The film excels in stress the importance of the tour three rubber-stamp Sham heroes do to raise money for the Government. Politicians are the real heroes of this plot: more Sibylline impostors, who not preparing the body on the battlefield, but draw the incendiary profiles of the martyr: cause that, at the end, in all the wars, on all sides, always benefits to them, whom they did not lift a finger and not shoot a bullet.In the absence of seeing letters from Iwo Jima, the vision of the conflict from the Japanese side, Eastwood returns to desmostrar is an author model, intelligent, committed to the film as a vehicle for emotions and responsibilities, independent and very personal.The film is not outstanding because there is an excess of flashbacks that bedevil the narrative thread and determine certain laziness to follow the history, that malea when it indiga in excess in the everyday life of evil called Heroes on their return home. Sobran final minutes and there is a (justifiable, in any case, but painful) excess of battlefield minutaje.The wretchedness of the false hero is emphasized with this return to everyday life: there is the Indian soldier that emboldens (drunk) with some policemen because not serve you at a bar because of his race, but then a whole Stadium will wait to see how staged the pin of the flag in a spectacular exercise in artifice invariably Yankee. The curious brand Spielberg-Eastwood production ensures quality cinema. This does not call into doubt, but here the master has not turned on the diana of excellence as we have lately accustomed: confined to tell us a story noble, necessary, difficult to chew on the skin of an American, but little nuanced if one is outside and attends this bombastic show of farces, hombres-anuncio and showy hymns for the return of the boys home.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1463

Daniel Galindo

Manuale D'Amore 2

muchocine

The first was a success and therefore repeated the formula with a title corrected and increased or, better said, stretched and ligerito.

Already the first installment of this tontón Decalogue of audiovisual self-help for "love of love" seemed to us a substitute helpings, entertaining but ultimately, mix of certain curious winks and many not so much by appellants.What is the novelty and the tape was fresh by surprising his mount and correct spinning of his argument. Also thanks to solvent and actors well known in Italy as Jasmine Trinca (the best of youth), but with little impact media outside the country. Experience makes us ready and shows the work of marketing, including sharing Elsa Pataky and the great Monica Bellucci. Avowed my predilection for the actress, I embarked on the task of making them see it lost in the passage of a craft creation to production in series and long.The factory of churros does this title which engarza some pearls? few, the truth - with cheap jewelry. The result is a necklace something kitsch that you you can put one, twice maybe, but already. They threaten to edit the damn manual updates, and we warned, it will no longer result in the desired effect. Here already costs Giovanni Veronesi, director and one of the three writers who write a couple of sympathetic, but not much more interesting stories than the other two, picked a little tweezers to fill the Turkey.Now, however, there is no doubt that this Manuale d'amore 2 will be a success, in the same way that it was the first, not only in the Italian box office but their international sales and awards? aspired to a few David Di Donatello. With a view to the promotion and sales, Barcelona is the framework where part of two of the stories.Falling in love, motherhood, less conventional marriage and extreme love. These are loopholes of love treated friendly although lacking strict cinematic interest, that for example is missing rhythm in their two latest stories. Now, if we see the film as an object of amusement, go see this fresco on los lances and the enchantments of love, will not repent, provided that it does not end with the feeling of that abuse their trust.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/363

Daniel Galindo

La joven del agua

muchocine

Same history itself is the worst of all, with remnants of stories caught here and there, mixed with mythology and popular belief patterns, a conglomerate of inconsistencies in the service of the aesthetic power.

Too often the trailer of the film is more interesting than the tape that promotes. That can occur them with the advance of this film, one more in the race to the bottom of a filmmaker, M. Night Shyamalan, which in 1999 reached a global and unexpected success with the sixth sense, the only tape of terror in a built filmography on the combined bases of genres ranging from fantasy to suspense. It is clear that a title so famous it can not live of for life, although some if they can exploit the Philo. The M. Night Shyamalan friend falls into account while the eerie title, caught with pins, is already very far. He repeated in formulas that seemed to work him as well, giving the impression that the multifaceted filmmaker is entering a creative crisis and maybe that is the main reason why has shown on this occasion its interpretative aspect. His latest tale of terror, like the previous ones, keeps in suspense until the end only if not sneaks a clever Viewer in the room and begins to tying up. On this occasion he did not want to abuse the formula because it has opted to not sow recesses of the path to follow, as in other titles in his filmography as a protégé and signals. Predictable at all times, girl with water combined fiction with another type of fiction based on the legend. Fairy tale with pathetic Concierge and boy for everything from monotonous life, is played by Paul Giamatti, which we have seen in American Splendor, Cinderella man and sideways, and the angelic although unexpected Bryce Dallas Howard, who was left blind in his previous project, after Nicole Kidman was new Muse of Lars Von Trier in Manderlay (continuation of Dogville). When all only highlight the most insignificant details? although they will be with me that the parody of film critic is great-, means that we have made a mistake with the libretto and its translation to images? here all of great beauty. Already happened just as the forest: an excellent setting not supported a weak script, so consider that same history itself is the worst of the set, with remnants of caught Tales from here and there, mixed with mythology and patterns from popular beliefs, a conglomerate of inconsistencies in the service of the aesthetic power and dam in turn from their inability to narrative. The film seems inspired by the world of fable which already supported Terry Gilliam to pay the land of illusion where the secret of the Brothers Grimm, emerges another tape failed while we get to know well why this. Than what we can think, and but lack you rhythm and fortitude as a final product, the adventures of our aquatic friend narf, any nymph, entertain. We draw the conclusion that Shyamalan knows well the tricks of the marketing and communication film, namely engage with the audience, throwing moorings but then not be able to anchor the ship. In other words, not thrilled, and if you cannot become gullible by hour and a half, the tale, rather than bringing us to distant worlds, serves only to fall asleep on the laurels.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4328

Christian Sandoval

Pero.... ¿Quien mató a Harry?

muchocine

"A dark comedy, courtesy of the master of suspense, showing perfectly ironic humor that this was owner"

But...Who killed Harry? (1955), is one of the films that tends to escape to the parameters by which one knows the Filmography of Alfred Hitchcock. This is a black comedy, which is based on the novel by Jack Trevor Story. This film was not a very good public acceptance, because it was not what one would expect from a work of this director. However, as it is often the case with many things, over time, is recognized the virtues to a realization that this far be one more than the pile.The story takes place in a small village in Vermont, where one day appears a corpse of a man named Harry. Several characters in the town encounter with the body of Harry. Although no one seems to care what this dead, some believe to have been responsible for the death of this man, including his wife Jennifer (Shirley MacLaine) and retired captain Albert Wiles (Edmund Gwenn). With the desire to avoid problems, Harry will be buried and dug up several times, giving place to a to a comedy of errors and some other affair.The fantastic cast that has this film this constituted by newcomer Shirley MacLaine, who was called after seeing his participation in the play "The pajama game". John Forsythe, who personifies Sam Marlowe, an eccentric artist of good heart, which seems to have fun helping your friends to hide the corpse. This actor would later star in another film by Hitchcock called "Topaz" (1969). In addition to these 2 great actors, the film boasts Mildred Natwick, Mildred Dunnock and Edmund Gwenn. They all do a fantastic job, representing a number of people that react in unusual way, in a way very hitchconiana one could say, find a corpse in the middle of the forest.This is the first film in which Hitchcock worked with the composer Bernard Herrmann, society which lasted for several years (the first post that I speak of this).Hitch would recognize later that this soundtrack was his favorite of the composed by Herrmann, even above those of "Vertigo" (1958) and "Psycho" (1960).The film works wonderfully well, in large part because the work carried out both by Herrmann as the by screenwriter John Michael Hayes, who write a fairly intelligent and fluid, script with dialogues quite well achieved and direct, even a little advanced for his time. An example of this is when Sam Marlowe tells Jennifer that she wants to paint nude, so without further ADO.The use of New England landscapes gives a rather special colorful film. Hitchcock chose these foreign because I wanted to show the different shades of nature in autumn, and go that he got.Although this film could be considered as the only comedy made by the master of suspense, in the final stretch, as if it were part of his nature, Hitchcock introduces a quota of suspense, to join the plot to the deputy sheriff Calvin Wiggs (Royal Dano), who can leave evidence involved, attributing them to the crime. However, this is also taken in a tone rather comical, involving a series of situations that opting in a happy ending.Another important fact in the film, is that the director through the shots done, is responsible for give the impression that the characters are dealing more with an object which with a body. Much of the shots that you performed the dead are shots of his feet. In fact his face only go in the drawing created by Marlowe.A despite being a work of undervalued by the director, is a cornerstone of his filmography, which accomplishment out of the genus mastered to perfection, to enter spoiling to the realization of a comedy, that despite that not brings laughter, is an example of ingenious ironic humor that was owner and director.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2348

Ramón Besonias

Memorias de Queens

muchocine

Hello, my name is credit and I will leave everyone

He says an adage that the artist always fable about what lives, or that other whereby if you want to be universal begins speaking in your neighborhood. Rookie Dito Montiel has been the story and in this his first work (runs and signature script), simple and honest, tells us that, himself, him and of his friends, his father, and neighborhood of Queens (named in honour to Queen Catherine of Braganza, wife of Charles II of England), the neighborhood where he grew upwhere he taking with his colleagues, where stealing kisses his girl, where measured his teenage arrogance with Puerto Ricans, but also where he saw die little by little the last lifeboat to leave this neighborhood that began you to stay small, and in which sensed would end or dead or selling drugs. At this his last and stifling summer of 1986 know that part of what that linked you to its roots, it should betray to grow and that sooner or later these roots would remind you who was, who did never be despite living five thousand miles from his family.But memories of Queens, despite its title, is not a story told from the nostalgia (as it is once upon a time in América de Leone) nor is a costumbrist painting in farcical key describing us the ups and downs of its protagonists (so have the family life of the Italian-American of Rockaway Beach? in the neighborhood of Brooklyn - described by Allen in radio days). No, memories of Queens is is the writer who speaks, who reads his story to the Viewer - from the memory of the child returns, after fifteen years of absence, in the skin of a perplexed man narrated? as every modern man, desmemoriado by the sirens of the road, in constant search of his Ithaca - by the news of the serious illness of his father, one who renegara his son after seeing how fleeing to California, the other end of their roots, the other end of everything. Because Queens is the Rodeo, and racial America of maternal plate on the table and street life, raised by immigration. "Why go to China?" There are Chinese in Queens. Why go to Puerto Rico or Italy? "All are in Queens." However, fresh California Sun was by then a symbol of the promised land of opportunities, where America picked up to his caínes wounded by poverty or dreams.Dito tells us, rather, account to itself at the time which passes through the current Queens, shy desmejorado reflection of the proletarian spontaneity of then, and prey to real estate speculation, the large shops in leisure and culture, and the idealized advertising memory of a time that is no longer. London Soho came likewise, going from working class district of pubs, prostitutes and poets without a penny, posh neighborhood where the great art galleries of the capital are located. Credit returns, Yes, and does it so by the chance of a heart attack which was not so unexpected, the heart of the old Monty Patriarch whose heart no longer resists, and whose pride nor refuses to leave the neighborhood even to go to the hospital. There, he must die with their boots on, perpetuate the inheritance, say himself that not nothing happens, there is no nothing that could not stand, despite disastrous in a neighborhood poisoned by apathy, violence and lack of future. "It's hot?." But of course that it is hot, it is summer. "Do tell you, Antonio?" But do not hold a credit, the heat is unbearable in Queens, and dreams of clean beaches, cool breeze and the television dream of a California prosperous, away from provincialism and misery?Memories of Queens reminds a bit of A history of the Bronx, not only by having the nearby Palminteri cast (even was the screenwriter), not only by placing the story in a New York of Italian immigrant neighborhood. No, its ratings are often in the parenting relationship, although if in the De Niro film the father serves as protection against the dangers of the neighborhood, and the seductive gangster Sonny (Palminteri) doubled in second father who discovers the boy what is made the world more sheltered from MOM and dad (as the median Lewis girl is seduced by a tattooed De Niro in Cape fear of Scorsese)do, in memories of Queens father becomes tragic metaphor of a neighbourhood that refuses to lose their identity? as Dito members, who know that they will be betrayed by friends that or die will go from there. And to it, the young credit must grow, widen his eyes beyond Queens. Why usa ticket of return to his Irish friend, filling the brain of musical dreams, that will take you to the beaches of Connie Island first as who travels to a distant country, to a small branch of the California to come?The best: the ellipses in which a teenager Laurie (Melonie Diaz) becomes a beautiful Rosario Dawson left already expected the return of who was his first love after the window of his house.The scene in which returns to the neighborhood and notes amazed how where there was a store of buns now stands an elegant business of go you know what and run by people who are not in the neighborhood.The images of the train, the train that takes us beyond the neighborhood, to other worlds are not this.Agile, everyday, sliding, dialogues like that camera constantly moving after a few characters that roam the streets aimlessly, without future.The character of Antonio, antagonist of Dito, alter ego of Monty, living memory of a neighborhood that spits miseries and resists on foot.The final scene, that silence.