Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3029

Tito Chinchan

Azumi 2

muchocine

Second installment of Azumi, who has to continue espadazos. For fans of the genre of struggles trail in Japan. Better have seen before the first.

To hartón Eastern films we carry, and unwittingly also. The first film I think that I've seen, but not entire. Begins with a man who is collecting orphans (formalized thus passed to the Duke of Feria and ended with the bones in jail) to teach them to the sword. Them is becoming murderers to such an extent, that last day of class have to give katanazos the more friend murderer have. Dog life.The film is located in the eastern Japan that every day we are surprised, truffled ninjas and clans who want to melt the emperor at all costs. Total, that these are Azumi and another boy continued to make that commanded the master, which is nothing more that give issue to the sword. In one of the battles, a boy who looks much Azumi he discovers his best friend that went through the sword long. Is he? Is not it?To be a second part, the truth that is not bad film. The argument is quite simple, Azumi picks up the sword and goes everywhere massacring anyone who gets him ahead. Easy. The downside of this is that it has a sweet face and refined manners who does not put me in the idea that it is a horrible killer. The rest of the characters give a tad of laughter, because they are not at all serious, if that don't Phooey. Fights are resultonas and the product has entertained me.In short, second installment of Azumi, who has to continue espadazos. For fans of the genre of struggles trail in Japan. Better have seen before the first.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1267

Berto

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

One of the great films of the year, plays with us with impunity while us stunned attended the show, and as said Caine throughout the film, "in the end what we really like is that we cheat", and best way is to see this film.

Just start the year and already have on board one of the films that at the end of the year, and if my memory allow me, end up annexing my top ten best films of the year. The Prestige, entitled disastrously with the name of the final trick (the Prestige), here is the bet Christopher Nolan gives us before embarking again on the adventures of the Lord of the night. For this risky film, Nolan adapting a novel by Christopher Priest, in which there is the rivalry between two magicians, who by vicissitudes of life, spend from two friends to face fiercely by both the public and his own life. Explain any part of the plot of this movie can be very difficult without gutting important parts of the film, making him lose all his charm, as if they really were a good show of magic in which we are witnessing stunned as the wizard plays with us until the end leaves us with an open mouth thinking for ourselves as it could have done that in front of our own noses. This wizard is none other than its director, as well explained in the film presents us with a great global magic trick, in which after having been submitted to the characters, is telling us a story that helps us deception to finally and with a twist a lot more elaborate than any of these films that come to us from Hollywood with the typical sign of surprising end and would leave already guess towards the middle of the filmtell us an ending that makes mentally review the recesses of the film to see how the film was braided really surprise us. From the first image of the film, no apparent relation with the rest until that we realize that if it is something important back in the middle of the film, until that end which clearly Nolan seeks, as well as its protagonists, the prestige of having managed to play with us for about 2 hours and be able to get away with so difficult "trick". At the beginning the narrative may be somewhat liosa, since it uses a narrative style that vaguely reminded me to another great work of yours, Memento, and without reaching the level of this, if that performs constant jumps back and forth in time, which serves to hook more if possible to the Viewer, you expect eager for another piece of the puzzle to try to complete the puzzle that makes up the film as a whole.As for the actors in the film, I don't think that it has better right with the election of Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman to play the two rival magicians. Bale will gradually be revealed as an actor very to consider, both for its quality in the latest interpretations made, as to fill the screen and make shade to his partner, Hugh Jackman in State of grace that chains a good movie after another, and that time to time, we have two of the actors with better screening here in a not too distant future. As secondary, Scarlett Johansson, in a role too prude (do in all aspects, which has seen the movie I mean?), and forgive me the easy game of words following your wardrobe in the film, but removing any scene in which looks great guy (and often great guy), its role could have been played by any other actress, already like his character in the filmis simply in the film to help the two magicians in the realization of this great final trick by which all are waiting. Michael Caine as always, huge, very wise its role and its interpretation, something that also happens to an unrecognizable at first seen David Bowie (do your eyes betray you?), very restrained in its role of scientist Nikola Tesla, and an important part in the development of the plot, with which the film comes to take a turn toward films of science fiction that can reach misplaced the viewer in some momentsnot waiting for a foray into this genre from history that is telling us.Ultimately, and as already said at the beginning, undoubtedly one of the great films of the year, plays with us with impunity while us stunned attended the show, and as said Caine throughout the film, "in the end what we really like is that we cheat", and best way is to see this film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3904

Ivan Villamel

1408

muchocine

Interesting movie, with successful moments of terror suggested giving it a slightly above-average interest, although with a final part full of clichés and the sense of a final development of history far-fetched to confuse the Viewer.

After a more Swedish director Mikael Hafstrom interesting Hollywood debut with a film at the service of Clive Owen in the genre of police thriller (without Control") is passed in its new proposal to the genre of fantasy, in this case to terror by adapting a short story of the master of suspense, at least for some, that not for a serverStephen King.La story begins with the visit of Mike Enslin (John Cusack) to a road motel supposedly inhabited by ghosts, to be documented on his next book, moment in which we see that it is not absolutely nothing in his presence. Despite this Enslin writes books about the ghostly inhabitants of these places, with books such as "1st haunted hotels" or "10 cemeteries haunted", all of them are guides for survival against ghosts, without even, according to his own words, has ever seen none. You could be considered a disenchanted fake who writes for pure and mere desire for economic survival, as evidenced by that 3 or 4 people interested in some books, which are described later as books of cuts in the section of cheap novels only cite in their debate in a library to talk about his work. When arise you the possibility of visiting the Dolphin Hotel, in which it is assumed that room 1408 this haunted, Enslin is the perfect occasion to close his new book with this final chapter about mysterious places and create his false story about a new haunted place. There he is greeted by the Manager of the hotel, Gerald Olin, played by Samuel l. Jackson, which warns that the room should not stay her, after a strip constant tug-of-war, agrees to let him spend the night in the room with some packing 1408, but not before warning him that the "ghosts" of this room live in your own interior. From there the film becomes the attempt of survival to one long night by the character of Enslin.Se could be considered the film an attempt to move to a single room the typical haunted house story (not worth naming "The shining" Kubrick or "The legend of hell house" by John Hough)(to cite films in this style, because it would be doing a disservice), a try quite laudable and with decent results, details such as the mirror effect through the window of the room towards the building opposite, the absence of Windows on the exterior of the building except the room 1408 are more than suggestive, and help to create an atmosphere of Kafkaesque nightmareas well describes the main character on one occasion. During the footage calls into question, rather than the existence or not of ghosts, the mental health of the main character, with details such as the recorder or pc laptop, aspects which compensate for that in a moment the film take a wrong direction, the direction that usually take this type of productions, which is turning on itself, trying to play with that all real or a figment of the imagination is the fact that has already left or not of room 1408, and that is precisely the time in which the film is damaged in a high degree of effectiveness. It must be said that as the film progresses back to fall, again as usual, in a final that doesn't know how to finish the story, which is pulled by the easiest way, where there is even room for a hint of final fright that not is beside the point to nothing.The work of actors does not pass to right, giving the sense of having gained the cheque and little more, especially John Cusack, which despite being a good actor in my opinion, I just do not see it in this type of production. Samuel l. Jackson is a little more comfortable in his role of hotel manager, but neither does much more to transcend beyond be convincing in his role as mysterious. By the director, little to add, put in very simple scene without any notion of personality, typical product of custom, limited to be correct.Ultimately an interesting movie, with successful moments of terror suggested that give an interest a little higher than the average, but with a final part full of topics once again and the sense of final development of history fetched to confuse the Viewer, the most usual way break something that you do not know how to end. Simply entertaining.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3382

Kiko de España

Alien Space Avenger

muchocine

Something like Pulp Slapstiscifi dominated the visual gag, the vodevilera musiquilla and the absurd.

Maybe that it do not think, but Alien Space Avenger is one of the worst movies in history with best "history" directed her in 1989 Richard w. Haines, three years after the terribly bad mutants at the University and is the final piece of the excellent leaflet horrorcasposo which began with Splatter university in 1984Y history mola.We are in New York in 1939 and know two couples then: them worried about arriving later to film and they worried not be talking still borrachuzos about comics.Well, just before this a yellow letters on the Galaxy inform us of the escape of four prisoners alien quite montoneros.Back to Earth see the vehicle or car of the kids (quite old, we will not trick) on a remote road at times of day, at times of night parked to piss.Then a UFO fly over the area until crashing in the forest that surrounds the protagonists and want clear, curious about the group to look at.You, as a viewer, already think that what you're watching "again": the pardillo stays with the parasite and will remove the rest of the group one by one.Because you're wrong. There are four aliens, one for each chic @ and as the dumbest opens the ship with a stone are all possessed. Duly humanized decide to then, approaching the town for some plutonium and nuclear fuel.The atmosphere of this part of the movie is something like Slapstiscifi dominated the visual gag, the vodevilera musiquilla and the absurd. After making a stop at a bar where they steal weapons and kill the clientele fled a UFO bounty hunter firing to the ufo with shotguns, hiding in the nave of the bosque.50 years later a few workers (will die in group to discover the ship and open.) They rediscovered the nave (with a shovel). And it is our only aliens to kill masses, go kill one unless violate you, then the human melts.In the current NY live Matt, a cartoonist in low hours. until he sees in a nightclub to these four villagers in the 1930s, they enter without paying. Matt isn't played by him, but could be.Matt becomes obsessed with them (being persecuted by the disco-pub while he draws them) because they seem to appear "from another world" and comes up with create a new comic book in which some terrorist aliens of the 1930s invade Earth. Terrorists is because in a nuclear power plant these ancient men kill 33 employees and steal a thermos with plutonium that was on a Toolbox. The journalist that narrates the events with hull put the adjective. Logical. Office Matt tells the idea to his boss, asking you for a sketch. In the next scene one of the aliens sees the comic in a kiosk and gets scared. Gathered in a water decide wrecking because course, your address is on the back. An alien bounty hunter gets inside the girlfriend of Matt and together they decide to exterminate the threat, something difficult because "they" regenerate debuti.And Matt is based on his experiences to draw comics. In this respect the movie becomes Super copied for good: a comic book artist who has a number of success on a bounty hunter alien exterminator of terrorist invaders of the 1930s. that in reality he is CCU!But the movie becomes embers despite not reaching the eighty minutes. The best thing is that about 70 people die or so. All "waiting for" his shot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/720

Beatriz Perez

Un buen año

muchocine

There true classicism in?Do a good time?, the speed with which moves history, the simplicity with which everything is displayed, how effective their dialogues, its more than good performances.

2006 Is coming to an end and there are many bad movies that have been released this year, and I have no doubt that was even released some more. We have also seen some great movies and I have not doubt that we will still see some more. Already I will speak at the time, as I did last year, the best and the worst that brought us the 2006. ?A good year? It will not be in either of the two lists, but if we did one in which only we appoint welcome films that convey the feeling as be happening a short holiday, you can film Ridley Scott headed the list, and even may have been the only one.For which this endorses Scott is simply one of the best directors of the past 25 years. Since that he started directing, in each decade has left us at least one masterpiece. Is also true that it had blunders and leg fat, because things like?The O´Neill Lieutenant? they have no name. Lately we are accustomed to see him directing blockbuster mastodónticas result of the huge success of?Gladiator?. Still, from time to time is has taken a breather for directing "smaller" as in the case of the maja films?The impostors?. Do now, after failing Orlando Bloom would be able to convey emotion, and before embarking on the most ambitious?Do American Gangster?, Scott is taken as a minivacaciones in every way to give us a piece of small good cinema without more pretensions than the make us feel good. And it succeeds.History the have seen a thousand times, or maybe more. An important London Executive hated by all due to his financial successes, receives the news that his uncle has died. As it is the most direct heir becomes the owner of everything that his uncle had: a large house in the French Provence, surrounded by vineyards. A place that is not going from years ago when as a child Summering there while he learned valuable things with his uncle. There is something more but already you the you know, and do not want to be the culprit of gutting you the predictable end. That Yes, no hagais case of the trailer, because if there is one thing that doesn't ever have a trailer that is the way in which a director addresses a particular story, its way to direct it.Scott realizes that not counting the greatest story ever told, something that other directors not taken into account. Even aspires to be a great movie regardless of the argument, and is in the absolute lack of claims where the film exits completely victorious, aided also by the impeccable style of a director to known chemical meaning the word cinema. Already one of the characters says: what is the most important thing to make a comedy work?, the pace. Scott met with more than, the pace of the movie is perfect, and to us we know in advance what is going to happen not get bored ever and continue with some interest until the end.An interest not found in the history that are telling us, but in the form of filmmaking by Scott, who performed here her most unusual film, and this is the strangest thing of all: the more atypical film of Scott is a completely typical romantic comedy. But we maticemos, we must always be qualified. The film is not a comedy in any rule, that make us laugh out loud. In fact, as much we outlined a smile and nothing more. Romanticism Yes there is, but not too load the inks or becomes ñoño, although that will depend on much of what they consider the Viewer as a geek (does there are beings who believe that?)The bridges of Madison? (is ñoña). And what does get the film is infect of joy that give off their images, although without reaching exceed us of course. That record again that we are not talking of a great movie. And it is this joy and the form of address of Scott so that we leave the room satisfied, especially if we have entered thinking that we were going to see a truño of three pairs of noses.Somehow and bridging the gap, this film reminded me some classic films today already forgotten by 99% of humanity and that saves some similar, although not precisely plot. There true classicism in?A good year?, the speed with which moves history, the simplicity with which everything is displayed, how effective their dialogues, its more than good performances. And that makes someone that makes the difference between this film and another of similar characteristics: Ridley Scott.Como have said it is not a great film, its lack of pretensions will benefit but also harms him, to which must be added one history rather than manida, and something really important: the absence of comical moments of truth. Suggests a few but never end develop completely, and that rather disconcerting. It is as if Scott not wanted that the spectator riera, that he does not remember this film as one of those where you've not stopped laughing and then you forget. I think that he has partly succeeded, but on the other hand we are left with the feeling that perhaps a couple of good jokes not him would have been bad, and even the film he would have won it.With regard to the actors say they are all magnificent and incredibly natural, as if they carry portraying their characters throughout his life. Russell Crowe is a simply amazing actor, and the fact that only has an Oscar seems unfair. Here a little crush see him in a role not dramatic, but there is no doubt that knows to move through the film like a fish in water. Albert Finney leaves less than one would like, and it is clear that the veteran helps you achieve a great interpretation, his character is charming. As is that of female potagonista, Marion Cotillard, a francesita that can stop with the mouth open to anyone. Also leaves Freddie Highmore demonstrating that it is one of the best child actors of today, their moments with Finney are the best in the film.A good film can draw a smile from ear to ear and achieve that we want to go to holiday France even if it is only a weekend. This for me is enough. Paraphrasing the singer Luis Moro in one of his multiple cinematic references, I don't have great stories, me is enough to make me feel good. Scott's is not a great story (its default), but makes you feel good (its success).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/455

Berto

Clerks 2

muchocine

An excellent continuation of a comedy classic. Kevin Smith it was quite difficult to be able to live up to his great masterpiece, but say it exceeds, if dignity keeps the Ribbon just as higher than in the first part.

Back in 1994, Kevin Smith surprised everyone with a very unusual comedy at that time. Shot in black and white, with very few resources, it was simply a day in the life of a sales clerk in a store in the typical American neighborhood. Said it may sound quite common, but the screenplay Kevin Smith had prepared for this film, is one authentic masterpiece, with a few characters who steal, on more than one occasion, laughter and even get to identify with them. Do after this great masterpiece of our time they followed more stories from New Jersey, city where he was born and where he decided to locate their films?Mallrats would then followed of chasing Amy, that everything the world considered his best film with Clerks, some years more Bob late Dogma, and Jay & Silent Bob strike back and for my worst of all his filmography A Jersey girl, attempt in vain to make a romantic comedy just being authentic basurilla.(Does in his own words Kevin Smith describes her as horror film?) Now, nearly 12 years later, again reunited with his two mythical characters, Dante and Randall, apart from Jay and Silent Bob, present in all of his films. In this continuation, and because of an accident, leave the store in which worked to enter Moodys, a species of McDonalds (the motto is i´m eating it). The years have not passed in vain, and while Randall remains the same that always, for Dante this is his last day of work before leaving his beloved New Jersey to marry and take the lead in a washing tunnel owned by his future father-in-law. It is this last day, this larghissimo day, which focuses in the film and which will bring all the surprises of the movie, and this is what serves as an excuse so again Kevin Smith build some more funny dialogues that I have enjoyed as comedy is concerned, something that should be taken into account imitators of American Pie and companyseeing as becomes truth, with its touch humor geek and rude sometimes, but I fixed just booting you a smile. The climax of the film comes with a discussion among fans of Star Wars and the Lord of the rings, and which is the best trilogy of the history, simply because that dialogue deserves the price of admission. For anyone who is already acquainted with Kevin Smith movie comment that it him no disappointment at all, I am big fan of yours and I have to admit that this film is his second best film, with Clerks in the first positions. For those who do not know, States from here that passes through the film and be prepared for an hour and half laugh non-stop, with a hyphen, again insisting, really fantastic that even feel sorry that the film will end.Actors because as in the first part, Brian O´Halloran great with his portrayal of Dante (think than an alter ego of the director) and Jeff Anderson remains the same that 12 years ago with his character of Randall Graves, mythical character that so many defects has just worshiping it. Jay and Bob (the director) are still there, seems no time passes by them, and the incorporation of Rosario Dawson gives a small commercial thrust to the film, and I have to admit that also this pretty well, with a character quite well built and that fits perfectly in any Clerks mythology, apart from the fact that it is an authentic Bonbonlol? Also deserves attention Trevor Fehrman, new incorporation as Rosario and a crack in her role as Elijah, Dante and Randall co-worker authentic and that double-dip almost all final Randall.En jokes, an excellent continuation of a comedy classic. Kevin Smith thing had quite difficult to be able to live up to his great masterpiece, but say it exceeds, if dignity keeps the Ribbon just as higher than in the first part and it is one more than exemplary continuation of the life of Dante and Randall. Let us hope that the Smith Let's now follow along this path and never more back into that big mistake which was A Jersey girl.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/948

Radon

Los Borgia

muchocine

Note the low-budget, I would have liked to see some of the struggles in battlefield, but guess become more that that had expensive enough tape.

They tell us the history of the Italian family regarded as the most corrupt of the history, by betrayals, incest and murder quite rigorously.The movie is entertaining, although sometimes it is difficult to follow the thread of events, especially when the young Cesar Borgia launches the conquest of territories in Italy. Chronological rhythm is somewhat chaotic, arrives to lose the notion of the time that is happening.Reflected is that Lucrezia Borgia, seemed a santa, and isn't exactly as he remembered, as was an accomplice to the murders, betrayals and incest. Even she herself participated in some of these murders. Is true that among his contemporaries was remembered as an instrument of his father and brother for the purposes that were persecuted.Highlight especially the metamorphoses of the young actor Sergio Peris, although does not fit me too in the role of bad in this film. I guess his eyes maintains something of innocence and do not see making ruthless sadist.Finally I have to admit that I have not bored watching the movie, although it is not a film that has fascinated me, maybe it's the history I do not like too, and if I see something, I prefer epic stories. In addition, it shows the low-budget, I would have liked to see some of the struggles in battlefield, but guess become more that that had expensive enough tape.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2965

Rafa Delgado

Déjà Vu

muchocine

A kind of 'Minority Report' but smaller and vice versa. Entertaining from beginning to end, 'Déjà Vu' leaves in suspense the viewer during your footage, and knows very well to maintain the pace and intrigue.

Interesting thriller directed by the brother of the director of 'gladiator', where an interesting cast headed by November Denzel Washington is up to. but not without much stress.A kind of 'Minority Report' but smaller and vice versa. Entertaining from beginning to end, 'Déjà Vu' leaves in suspense the viewer during your footage, and knows very well to maintain the pace and intrigue.However disappointed in some other plot point: let loose and small unknowns unresolved in the air, something which reflecting on the final outcome of the tape hurts enough to put note.Despite this, entertaining.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1698

Josini

Dies irae

muchocine

Never cinema has benefited both to symbols, being able to relayed the field of understanding to wrap the lands of the spirit. No doubt Dreyes is the filmmaker of the spirit.

This Danish film is, as others that I've seen of him, a criticism of intolerance, in this case religious intolerance, as well as Gertrud was a criticism of intolerance in love. It is an inquisitorial process for witchcraft in which overlooks the revenge and the curse, that Herlofs Marte begs for his life to the Inquisitor to, however, has a lot to hide about witchcraft and his family.He is says something which is strictly true Dreyer's: is the only filmmaker who has been able to reflect the same spirit. This is the second time that I see this film and I again moves from the first image the figure of the elderly witch, so old and so fragile, with a quite good-natured face that reminds me so much of my mother, and that during the following scenes over and over again begs for his life, to the same end. It is not a good character exposed to evil and intolerance, it is much more: is the same goodness and the same fragility, an idea, a concept that transpasa corporeality and until the death, which is timeless in the same story, after several viewings of the film or to different viewers. It is a similar AWE to the of having seen a spirit, but one that not surviving us very deep fear but a compassion and a penalty.I feel the need to continue talking on that spirit, that not so reflected as plasma character, which could undoubtedly also applies to the female character of Gertrud. Herlofs Marte collides head-on with the inhumanity of their inquisitors but not breaks out of rage or despair, but facing her focusing in their aim to avoid fire. Does not believe in their monsergas, not accept them. The old is hard, as one of them says.And what words could wield to praise the scene of torture: or the scene in which open to the intestines to William Wallace at Braveheart overwhelms both. Both scenes are based on the visual ellipses. Here we see the impassivity of the faces of the inquisitors while we hear real screams of pain in the room, as if they were processed crude judicial paperwork. And we know that it is a fragile old woman. And we see it crying. By the way that these cries are so real in the version dubbed in Spanish, which must be something international and indescribable in this scene from physical pain.Also the old Herlofs Marte to repeat how much that fears death and fire. It is a genuíno animal fear, one that feels as its own when says it an old implorante aid and shaking a cold there must be greater than that which could feel those wet peasant stay where history makes it tiritar.And all this is just part of the story because then there is the second part in which a forbidden love bursts with the heartbreaking death. And here we have Visual symbols embodied with a success as ever in cinema: never wheat fields, the tall grasses of the meadows where strolling lovers or los altos and leafy trees that become his witnesses have been for me so close to my experiences. Never cinema has benefited both to symbols, being able to relayed the field of understanding to wrap the lands of the spirit. No doubt Dreyes is the filmmaker of the spirit.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/338

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Superman returns

muchocine

If the future Viewer has children, of him a ration of hero. Yes it lacks this profile, go to see Zulo, that goes something else and is also film. And good.

This Philo Blockbuster can lead to confusion because it contains the seeds of a franchise, with everything that the movie business is capable of producing, and also certain traits of well-done film with scraps of film worth trying a product as arson filling to the greedy épila of suits that fly and hidden supernatural powers under a raincoat. And Bryan Singer, director fetish of the comic world tra its competent two X-men (not the third, overused by a pedestrian Ratner, sneaks into two hours and average of footage some evidence of her particular vision of the hero, we ignore whether with the consent of the producer, which might jeopardize the box if Superman leaves us a talkative dramatic or a guru of the postmodern mystical.) Singer makes, there is nothing, a religious, adult Superman and so weak, that is, human. Wants to Singer demonstrate that a superhero film can carry out without lowering his pants too and does so with a roster of actors very well sought after (the Donner Superman wasn't manco here) and a millimeter script which locks the purely visual form (bait for comics man-eaters, pongo by case) with a metaphysical background. Yes. What happens is that this architecture of purposes desmembra when the film takes 20 minutes and we have already seen practically everything you expected to see. Kevin Spacey, which leaves her London stage to inflate your account with a nutritional character is Lex Luthor closer to the more morbid Hannibal Lecter that to malo-malísimo, soft in the background, caricatured in previous installments, to which we were accustomed. Saturated merchandising, but this is inevitable. More when the premiere is in summer and the tails of the film amogollonan of entire families in search of two hours of placid rest truffles a couple of kilos of special effects. My son enjoyed the Nice. Father served as a responsible parent and recalled that also, at his age, he was taken by an uncle to see the first Christopher Reeves movie. If the future Viewer has children, of him a ration of hero. It is an icon of this last century who escaped. Yes it lacks this profile, go to see Zulo, that goes something else and is also film. And good. Or turn on your dvd, select 5.1 and perpetrating emotional stillness to excite with Apocalypse now, Coppola. A few days ago I did, and still my pampered memory thanks him.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3056

Bruji

Salvador

muchocine

Do do with the already classic? bed comedietas? directed by them and performed by them, for the sole purpose of justify and receive State subsidies and with the clear intention of insulting lovers - it is possible that, from time to time, to do a good movie; and this is it.

Few, few years ago, in this country, "the good people" had authority to decide on the life and death of human beings. In this way, killing with impunity was unfeasible. In the same country, current date, it no doubt to judge other dictatorships. Nor be fret to review the proceedings of their own. Surrounded by controversy, the story told by Mediapro is more than a film, a historical document.Sometimes I think that there are two different versions of the film Salvador. One would be that the Spanish Academy has shortlisted to compete at the international level, the same was long Ovation and was thrilled in the Claude Debussy Theatre, which enjoyed a good reception from the press authorized in this Festival. But there would be a different one, which, according to some, enters Cannes through the back door in the section "A certain look", which unknown character that portrays, and that distorts the historical epoch in which fits. I can't remember another film that has so radically opposing reviews. It must be because I am not the only one who has a tendency to judge films from their arguments. On this occasion, it is just analyze history from various angles. In principle, it is encouraging to know that there are people that strives to make cinema in the national panorama. From the classic "comedietas of bed" - directed by them and performed by them, for the sole purpose of justify and receive State subsidies and with the clear intention of insulting the moviegoers - it is possible that, from time to time, be made a good movie; and this is it. On the other hand, I have always believed that cinema Spanish has an outstanding debt with the historical genre. Only there to look at the glorious American Studies who have told in a thousand different ways the little story that have, or have been invented. In that sense, this film could open a way in which are beginning to pay off these debts, not with facts or characters of the past, but with ourselves. People of my generation, for example, knows who is Hurricane Carter thanks to American cinema, but we never hear of Salvador. From the strictly cinematic point of view, the production of Jaume Roures has important successes. I would like to emphasize its unbeatable action scenes, the impeccable narrative structure that accompanies the tape, the direction of actors, the scrupulous staged, its poignant dramatic load or intelligent dialogues. Let us remember the long flashback, accompanied by the sweet voice of hispano-alemán Daniel Brühl, who answers the question asked a prison officer: "You who you're intelligent, prepared, good person in the background, how you've got this?". We should also remember the fantasy guided the Salvador before his little sister with respect to air travel, the view that has the protagonist of its parent and the terms in which is addressed to him, or the essential conversations in Catalan, a language "which leaves us without wanting to". There are many frames that are unforgettable for its aesthetic beauty, without forgetting those other levels dealing with contrasting the serenity of who wrote "I wish blood not shed needlessly", with the professionalism of the executioners. Another important fact is to know the end, is not without prejudice so that the director knows to keep the soul of the viewer in the air.We, therefore, have decisive factors that make this a footage not only able to compete with the best, but win. Indeed it is, such as defined by the producer, a universal film. At the plot level, it is true that this film is characterized by certain "political asepsis" which reproaches him for, but this is also a success, a trend which is used deliberately to show the human side of the character. However, not deepen in the ideals of the M.I.L. - so romantic as sleepless-, or not go into detail on the various ways of opposition to the Franco regime, are not sufficient grounds to state categorically that "neither is known to the character nor the time". We bear in mind that all those responsible for this film, since the director until the creator of soundtrack, passing by the writer of the novel Compte enrere on which is based the script, are people living in the Spain of 1974, arriving to become obsessed by the figure of Salvador, which it dealt with in all its dimensions and that show a story that is taken care of to the most insignificant detail. I can think of C.N.T.E abbreviations that appear on old phones. The essence of this film is summed up in the phrase that has been marketed: "In a time that was eager to freedom, he dared to live without fear". This is a key message that manages to reach the public in a clear way and without distortions. Lose in other directions would have not led to any place. The director says that "this film is due to the latest generation who fought for ideals". Let me add that this story also due to the following generations, who we first met Salvador thanks to a trailer, which maintain intact the innate spirit of struggle against injustice. Without forgetting that, above all, Manuel Huerga tape becomes a history lesson for teenagers in this country. Perhaps, those facts, help them understand the letter of the modern melody - cara Al sol - of your mp3.Remember and, in this case, know, is the best way that history will never repeat.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1534

Rafa Ferrer

Zathura

muchocine

Adventures in abundance a script with provides the "harder still" in each sequence, full of special effects, and with two beginner youth.

Formerly known as Jumanji 2, that it is based on the second book in history. Initially expected that Robin Williams returned to his role as the first film, but in the end did not accept. Filming was carried out in 2001, but was eventually delayed until 2005. At the beginning of the project, Ken Ralston, the supervisor of effector Visual of Jumanji, was going to debut as a director with this film. Years later, Dennis Dugan joined the production as director but then abandoned was replaced by Jon Favreau. Adventures in abundance a script with provides the "harder still" in each sequence, full of special effects, and with two beginner youth (which we have seen as secondary in some other movie, Tim Robbins appears in a small role (the father of the protagonists) and Kristen Stewart that we saw star alongside Jodie Foster in "Panic room" David Fincher thriller is the older sister (quite more grown than in the previous film)) of the two munchkins.A soundtrack full of moments heróicos accompanied by an exceptional images on screen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1342

Francisco Bellón

En busca de la felicidad

muchocine

In search of happiness is another of so many films dedicated to selling the American dream to the world.

That the reality surpasses fiction, also be a very recurring topic in many cases is true, like what reads another hackneyed phrase, that art imitates life. There are occasions in which a real event is so incredible that it seems removed from the mind of a writer, and coincidences of life, most likely this true event will end up giving rise to some "inspired by a true story" movie. Well, that is the case of in search of happiness, although the fact upon which it is based is not one of those stories that become headline news in half the world.Chris Gardner (Will Smith) is a man dragging a bad economic situation following a bad investment in medical devices. However, and despite the precarious, it attempts to improve his life thanks to his innate ability for mathematics and a programme of training of an important agency of values. The truth is that the tape is closer to the melodrama of "use and throw" that to something else, with all due respect to the real Chris Gardner, which has a cameo in the final scenes. It is a byproduct genuinely Hollywood, with the only raison d ' être of show and export the validity and force of the American dream, because any person, if it is proposed and acts with perseverance, is capable of achieving a priori unattainable goals. Well, there is actually another goal, something else in the meantime concealed cheap edulcoramiento, and is the search by the protagonist of a new nomination to the Oscar, and who knows if the same statuette. However, Will Smith is not commensurate with the circumstances and the wild promotion of which has been the subject, and performs an interpretation flat, without transmitting any type of emotion or feeling. The script is nothing more than another crude copy of typical human (so fashionable lately) overcoming stories, full of phrases gandilocuentes and empty, of clichés, ridiculous situations (that scene of the Rubik's cube in the taxi please!). The characters are one stereotype after the other, and that nobody expected the slightest developments therein. Say that in search of happiness is expected soon from the same trailer, any viewer is able to mentally draw the knot and outcome of the plot.Ultimately, in search of happiness is another of so many films dedicated to sell to the world the American dream, but on the road they forget to mention certain details such as the fate or a person's innate ability and that others do not possess.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2007

Oscar Cantero

Trastorno

muchocine

A film that avoids the usual line Spanish film, but that makes it through a repetitive and lacking spark argument.

Disorder is one of those Spanish movies characterized by escape from the usual line of patriotic cinema, which has always tended to abuse the comedy and the permanent sexual tension. In this case, the psychological aspect of the characters and scenarios, giving the film a more characteristic of other latitudes, but also correct environment has worked.Isn't that the argument is very original nor is developed with particular brilliance, but a quite correct interpretation of its cast, especially of the usually desaprovechada Ingrid Rubio, and a good job of production, get the end result has been acceptable, although I particularly lacking a more lively pace and a tad more of complexity in the plotHe would have perhaps won integers with the introduction of some twist or surprise that made not as predictable as it turns out.Fernando Cámara directed in 1997 memories of the fallen angel, a movie that already indagaba this online but to which was added a touch supernatural and uncertainty that my opinion, made a most interesting production before the us. In any case, disorder deserves to spend awhile, but not in the film, where I do not think to return to project, but the Chair of House and with a gin-tonic and a package of pipes to pass the time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2046

Ramón Besonias

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

As science fiction film is correct, entertaining at times, but becomes soon what it is: a thoughtful metaphor, poetic times.

Cuarón and Iñárritu share in his two recent works that look bitter (do Mexican?), penetrating and thoughtful on the contemporary world and its contradictions, as well as a perspective without concessions on the pain and loneliness. Children of men this picture is drawn through a future and apocalyptic, London mired in terror and despair, whose state releja in a bleak apartheid (which recalls Auschwitz) their migrants, and leads to its citizens to suicide or neglect (as of the own character played soberly by almost always great Clive Owen).But - as in Babel - it will be precisely from the womb of these immigrants where escape the last hope for an opulent society, tech, but sterile and nihilist, condemned to disappear. The political claim of Cuarón is explicit. Yet his speech - and that of his friend Iñárritu - does not close there. Both investigate the psychological drama of his characters, extracting from him a perfect metaphor of our civilization, but at the same time a personal reflection that shoots straight to the Viewer, unsettling him and forcing him to think.The script works as a metaphor intended is not warning about what could happen to our civilization, but that rather distorts the reality in which we are already installed to ensure that every spectator performed his own map of the world and its paradoxes. The immigrant is taken in children of men as archetype of the other, to the opulent world fears but need as cheap labour and increase in its birth statistics. Europe did not want to have children, or any a meager number of retirees pace that thicken the Imserso.Pero infertility which talks about the film is more extensible to the climax that according to Cuarón breathes in a first world tired although abundantly surrounded by amenities. The scene in which thousands of dozens of citizens discover with grief - in front of their televisions extra-shallow - the news of the death of the youngest of their fellow citizens is insightful. Acceptance of death and the need of hope can only reach of countries with a biography tinged of pain and poverty. A self-satisfied society does not accept death and is intended to deceive living the dream of eternal happy present.Do already in Y tu mamá also? and his first work, Sólo con tu pareja, or as Assistant Director in Gaby: a true story - see the concern of this filmmaker by exposing the cuts that we did flee from death and pain. And does it so ruthlessly, but always leaving room for hope of reborn feel touched by the misery and deadly.In children of men, Theo receives a timely visit of Julian, with whom he had a son, died of a fever shortly after. Julian encourages Theo to go a journey of redemption which will save his dreary existence because of the memory of his dead son. As the character of Richard (Brad Pitt)? or of Chieko (Rinko Kikuchi), in his desperate search for love - in Babel, Theo learns that pain only healthy with the help of the other. In fact, before appeared Julian, Theo only had friends locked up in their ivory towers, bearable by the music and drugs (Michael Caine) or the enjoyment by the beautiful (Danny Huston). Julian (Julianne Moore) returns to reality, as the Matrix Morpheus. You will even have to impersonate one immigrant, discovered the treatment they receive and the conditions in which they live.In turn, human project is suited as a nothing subtle metaphor for this utopian space (away from the city, on the high seas, no fixed port) where the differences are highlighted as only as a means to protect fundamental rights and not to segregate, exclude or exploit, and where all are treated only as they are human. Hope cannot come either from terrorism that says defend rights of minorities against the totalitarianism of an oppressive State. Why the girl by birth does not have more room than this boat has no more owner that you want it to, outside the city, that London, symbol of progress and democracy.Children of men enjoy more leaving you suggest beyond shown (which is not little). As science fiction film is correct, entertaining at times, but becomes soon what it is: a thoughtful metaphor, occasionally poetic (as that final scene shot dead building, with some soldiers petrified to hear the cries of the baby). To highlight the start-up scene, the setting of an unrecognizable London, flat hairpin sequence, rather than good actors. But it is not a film that meets the stomach of a good lover of action cinema, it is not even a science fiction to use film, although this genus end easily skirting the border of ethical and political discourse.Among the most remarkable moments that empty, almost crumbling school visit.You can read in the works of p. D. James in which this film is based: "We have departed from us, as parents in mourning, all the painful memories of our lost." Games for children have been withdrawn from the squares.They burned all the toys, except dolls that some women not all strings used as substitutes for children. Schools were closed for a long time until they shut down them or turned them in educational establishments for adult people.The voices of children heard only on cassettes and disks."It is unbearable for some, but for the majority of people work as a drug."

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1992

José A. Peig

Spiderman 3

muchocine

At the end, and bearing in mind that this is the peak of a trilogy about one human being rather than a superhero, the style and profile of Peter Parker is ennobles and plays its role in the area for which it has been created.

A man of sand, a sticky poison, a photographer, the old aunt who gives good advice (what good woman, what mantra so requetesobada), love, jealousy, hatred. And at the epicenter, the hero, Peter Parker, who will come to sustain and suffer the weight of the plot in this new installment filmed the man spider, which most rummages (or intends to dig) in the emotional world of the main characters. After its two predecessors (brilliant, though never perfect), and time to complete a trilogy, Sam Raimi meets the problem common to all the sagas in lathe to superheroes. The main defect of "Spiderman 2" consisted of stretch and squeeze too about same issues: the vulnerability of the hero, the waiver by love, sacrifice the dreams in pursuit of heroism. On that occasion, in broad terms, the result was more than acceptable, and Spider-man began to become a soap opera, not the masked hero but about human responsibility to embody the exploits of a superhero that drag on his conscience. In Spider-Man 3, the saga is amplified and rises to one octave higher, stretching and returning to stretch the same topics, the inevitable when a study does persist in turning into saga material that would only give to a couple of good movies. Therefore, in the third step, and following the canon, Raimi, to avoid the repetition brazen and bland, was left to explore the dark side of the hero, without be able to avoid remember "Superman II" and "Superman III", in which Donner and Lester marked the steps to follow (see Superman renouncing heroism by love, II, and III)(, facing his dark side, in one of the most remembered by the older generation geek scenes, although the film as a whole is pretty mediocre, but bad to nausea).Therefore, Spiderman III insists and is repeated in the above but adding a touch of darkness, situándo the hero in fight with itself. And at this point in the film, as that is quite difficult to surprise the average viewer. And you know what happens when they tell us the same story all too often; that all comes down to a Manichaean, pamphilus and apathetic, empty product of creative values, predictable.The "technical" narrative of Raimi (quoting comes with sorna and nasty) is reduced in the television soap opera style: love scenes, so clear of facile lie down on his back: "no longer I want-lagrimita - what you've done? - lagrimita - is there another person-lagrimita - is mi-lagrimita raisins - that kiss that you've given to the other was our Kiss-lagrimita". We are not malicious, but because they are going to tell us a little bit original, the only thing that could save the product is how tell you us.Spectacular battles, vengeance as destructive impulse that moves the characters, the rencor.y to the end even the need to forgive!. A true film about good and evil in which the decisive battle being waged in the depth of the hearts. The true, and in this layer the film succeeds almost in unexpected ways, is that each piece and character takes his load motivaciónal justified as the story progresses. The man of sand peca por amor (to daughter), Parker, who in turn is love and rancor to the memory of his uncle killed by the man of sand, Harry, sinner out of love for his father, redeems in love to the friend, and after learning the truth of the facts. In this film, the tormented hearts are cured when the truth comes to light: Parker knows the circumstances of the murder of his uncle, which motivates his forgiveness, and Harry forgives Parker when he meets the true circumstances of the death of the father.In short, although in a few years no one will remember this movie, although it is not a great movie, all justified in the final stretch and Spider-Man 3 sees the light that compensates for excessive footage, probable inconsistencies argue them or the treatment of helpings which gives to relations between and the construction of characters. There is a network of relationships that, at least, follows a scheme defined and organized according to an idea. Idea loaded moralina, even some religion. But in the end, and bearing in mind that this is the peak of a trilogy about one human being rather than a superhero, the style and profile of Peter Parker is ennobles and plays its role in the area for which it has been created. Scholars of the comic can say many true things. But here we talk about movies, we are not interested in the comic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1150

José A. Peig

Alatriste

muchocine

The film of Díaz Yanes unconvincing because never get to find herself, tells stories and tells the story of a villain-hero, but he fails the basic idea to clearly define all the development and the human sense of adventure.

If, when talking of "code Da Vinci" it seemed to us that subjecting the film to the book - and therefore not differentiate and not understand that cinema and literature use different stylistic resources - was the worst of mistakes and, accordingly, the result was a gravel, here we have an attempt to put five books into a whole film % forty minutes. and do time in the history of the Spanish cinema. A chestnut, come on, it has everything to be. But what about Alatriste?. Because I, honestly, do not perceive any clarity of ideas in that sense by their perpetrators.If you want to make a great film it is essential to have very clear the idea, the concept and style. And "Alatriste" stays at half way up several things, without creating the essence and the meaning absolute in any of them. It is an adventure film?. Something that wants to be, but develop own adventure (entertainment without ups and downs, the show, the Odyssey of the hero which lies at the epicenter of all frames and byways that wrap) the climate and the tone is incompatible with that pace so slow, with harangues that don't come to mind and hamper the action (probably in the original book of Pérez Reverte made his role)(, but here are a drag) and, above all, with the absence of an effective structure to develop and explain emotional ties, reasons, causes and effects of the events, actions or thoughts of the different characters and different situations that confront us, all too often, unless we know why or without having the viewer a reason to be interested by the Fortune or the misfortunes of some and others. "I.e., narration is quite disjointed, though perhaps not as well as it seems, case that we sort the film under another different"adventure film"concept.""Alatriste" also can be understood as a mosaic of an era or a whimsical documentary historia-ficción in which the main character serves as a thread for the argument and excuse to develop a rich scenery and the range of devoid of own essence profiles that appear on the screen for the sole purpose of giving game. Ultimately, the film works a little better if I consider a "mosaic of time", not so much if it is an adventure film. (However, the Duelists, it has something of the two things and solves much better, by the way). But even so, I repeat, Díaz Yanes film unconvincing because never get to find herself, tells stories and tells the story of a villain-hero, but he fails the basic idea to clearly define all development and sense human adventure (soon talk of "The captain Blood", to explain in more detail what I mean by that). If add you the tedium produced by the slow pace, by unnecessary long flat, scenes that pass slowly but that do not contribute anything to the story, and the bad use of the ellipsis to the absence of a properly articulated the development content (I thought the ellipsis was a method to save surplus parts that the viewer can assume)(, not to break the structure and the narrative fluidity), could reach a conclusion: is a very bad movie. However, saved from burning by a brilliant use of technical resources and a laudable discretion to the director: say Yanes camera not risk not one inch more than the conventional, but retains dignity in almost all of the footage, well directed scenes of battles (and with this the only thing I'm saying is that you do not worse than Peter Jackson)(for example, which it doesn't have much merit, said it in passing) and know create a certain atmosphere with a proper staging. Photography, art direction, costumes, the successful soundtrack, the sporadic moments of emotional tension, etc, end up restore dignity to a film that being quite loose, insubstantial and empty, does not become so disastrous, as it has been written in recent weeks.What I have no doubt is that "Alatriste" end up being an inconsequential product in the Spanish area and, even more, in the international; a purely anecdotal, interesting product as a representation of our "golden age" and to see family admiring worthy representations of famous historical personalities such as Quevedo, the count Duke of Olivares or King Philip. But for that I think it would have been better to make a series of television thirty chapters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1919

Kamala

La vida de los otros

muchocine

It is one of the best films I've seen in a long time and I commend to everyone. Loyalty, friendship, betrayal, love, fear, value... Finally an essential movie.

Some weeks ago I saw this magnificent film, Opera prima, Florian Henckel Von Donnersmarck, who deservedly won the Academy Award for best foreign film. If the world just outside and the Oscars a few universal Awards, Ulrich Mühe and Sebastian Koch awards would have brought to best actor of this year. I do not know how it will be Forest Whitaker in "The last King of Scotland", but what is Ulrich Mühe in this film is im-pre-sio-nan-te. And Sebastian Koch you will not lag behind in talent, accompanied by a no less fantastic Martina Gedeck.Se remain in the memory frames of this film, shot in a very classic, simple way in appearance, without large stridency. In the great film always, most importantly is the story, which is telling. Is the film the vehicle that is narrated, and in the great works, the best technique is not note is, you do not feel that it is there, that is the story that takes you? This is the case in this film, however, has some moments of script not so round and who (now boy, a bit simple to oppose pureza-maldad) it could dispense with or who may be more marked (until the end do not know how long has been the captain of the Gerd Wiesler Stasi spying on the couple formed by the prestigious playwright and writer Georg Dreyman and popular actress Christa-Maria Sieland)by what becomes a little difficult to understand as "fast" identification between the principles of the military and the intellectual? (Time is contracted by imperative film duration and that that the hard movie more than two hours, passed flying).Are a few a little no "buts", I acknowledge, because the film is a work of precision, the silences and the dialogues are perfect, righteous, framed in a film planning (with very classic levels) and a photograph that? grey in exteriors, warmer in the apartment-very appropriate to situate ourselves in the GDR in the 1980s and check how it worked its espionage service, the Stasi.Es one of the best films I've seen in a long time and I commend to everyone. The loyalty, friendship, betrayal, love, fear, the value? are they transposed and are redefined throughout the film. Who is "fair"? what is being "fair"? Who or what? What is "treason"? If we betray ourselves, is the same do so out of conviction or fear? Survival or principles? Involvement against injustices, at the risk of losing life, or uncomfortable passivity? And it is that individual decisions affect everything that surrounds us, the story that we are creating. Three characters teach us that there are many forms of courage and integrity in a pequeña-gran story, of those that reflect one of the thousands of lives that make up what then it is in the books.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1823

Antoni Messa

La flauta mágica

muchocine

Despite the undeniable Office invested in its realization (for me the highlights of the film), the magic flute is aimed at a very specific audience. They can hardly connect and enjoy with her who, like a server, have certain problems with Opera.

Firstly, I must admit that I have never liked the Opera. It has always seemed a musical genre bombastic and overloaded. Perhaps for this reason that, faced with the adaptation of the flute magic performed by Kenneth Branagh, I aburriese in a sovereign manner in the film.I can assure you that it is not fault of the script or actors, and much less than the work of British director, because the latter, in particular, shows extremely splendid. Their visual capacity and virtuosity with which the camera leads are of exquisite quality and a technicality. The lengthy and meticulous flat sequence that opens the film, for example, is worthy to be included in any anthology of the seventh art self-respecting. It is clear that the problem is entirely mine. And is that the Opera and I are not made for each other.Filmed entirely in studies and set between France and Germany during the first world war, through this priceless flat initial sequence already mentioned, Branagh made an extensive tour among French trenches, inside and cliffs follow the flight of several birds; faced with a large air Squadron; low back to Earth to show the enemy troops, and after several and amazing acrobatics more, ends that visual walk - by way of Overture-in the same trench in which began it. To get the hat. A wonder for whose realization had to dip the digital technology; the only way to be able to orchestrate an as captivating as this planning.The rest of his footage - cinematically speaking – is not so spectacular, despite having an attractive scenery cared for to the smallest detail. Avoids deliberately turn your camera in the main spotlight of the magic flute, giving the role to the music that Mozart composed in 1971 with the libretto by Emanuel Schikaneder, and how not, to the splendid showcasing (according to connoisseurs of the genre) of the singers chosen for the occasion.Anyway, the operatic most purists, have criticized the decision to have been sung in English rather than opt for the original German. I do not know if happened the same when, in 1975, the reputed and untouchable Ingmar Bergman (uncredited) performed an adaptation, aimed at the television screen, the same work.A tale of love, magic and music, combining perfectly the passages most colorful and festive with a good number of flashes dark and macabre. A work that departs radically from the usual view that the film has the Shakespearean director, and he takes it - by placing the action in the middle of a war contest - to launch a hopeful song of harmony and peace, very consistent with the rough current political and global scene. Despite the undeniable Office invested in its realization (for me the highlights of the film), the magic flute is aimed at a very specific audience. They can hardly connect and enjoy with her who, like a server, have certain problems with Opera. I tried it. And trancas and barrancas, I overcame more than more than two hours of duration. The visual charm of Branagh luck!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1095

Juan Nadie

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

This has not made that start, because soon we will have on our screens the other part of the story. The battle of Iwo Jima from the Japanese side. For the moment, all cry and are looking for our Iggy.

If there was a key moment in the history of Iwo Jima according to the civilian population that was in which an AP reporter took an image that he sailed around the world and, seen thousands of miles away, it was a powerful blow to the Japanese army in World War II. It was February 1944 and several American soldiers were sent to the top of Mount Suribachi, at the Centre of the island of Iwo Jima Pacific, to hoist the flag of stars and the bars. A milestone it that would trigger the euphoria after five days of arduous battle. Moments later, another group of soldiers is sent with the purpose of replacing the original flag for a spare. It is then, in which iza spare is in which Joe Rosenthal take the significant snapshot. United States needs heroes, need to know that their men are fighting for something and that image of the flag is for them a triumph over the enemy. The battle lasted one month, but that no longer mattered. The marketing was done and soldiers surviving protagonists in the picture are sent returned home to the United States. They are heroes and as such they should behave. They will help the Government to raise funds for the rest of colleagues who have stayed on the battlefield and to ensure that the army not missing neither ammunition nor resources. They have become the best claim to box. But they aren't just a product. They are men. A doctor (John 'Doc' Bradley - Ryan Phillippe), a Messenger (Rene Gagnon - Jesse Bradford) and a (Ira Hayes - Adam Beach) Indian who drag war traumas that do not leave them at any time. They are alive. Yes. But they are also victims of human barbarity. The war being persecuted. Each with a personal story. And all of them are master Clint Eastwood has decided to capture with your camera in a masterpiece.The hardest man in Hollywood who was once again demonstrates his talent behind the camera and builds a great film built on a very solid script and a tremendously successful casting. Ryan Phillippe is perhaps the main protagonist. His son will, on the death of the father, decide to investigate what happened and how marked the placement of that flag and the war to his father and his battalion companions. The image is only the present to tell the life of the protagonists, their feelings, sufferings, paths crossed and tragic end, already the most forgotten. Phillippe, the doctor who the cries of the fight and the inability to save all his companions you pursued throughout his life, gives the character the fragility and vitality necessary. Bradford, known face, portraying a young soldier with aspirations and a girlfriend addicted to fame. Adam Beach, the Indian who already starred opposite Nicolas Cage Wildtalkers, returns to appeal to his indigenous face as a symbol of identity. But only as characterization, since that is the hardest character in all and, therefore, one of the most complicated to interpret. Especially if we take into account that it must address much of the film with more alcohol that blood in the veins. They also deserve a special mention Barry Pepper (Mike Strank in the film) and James Bell, actor who rose to fame for his role as Billy Eliot and here gives life to the inseparable companion of Doc, Iggy. In addition to actions already mentioned, we must unite a great cast of side which Eastwood is able to get the best. Only have to look at the performance of Paul Walker (the undercover police to any gas). More meritorious is everything if one takes into account that, despite being a war film, it has not been necessary to Prime with bloody scenes. Although, as a good war film, one has.All this with a refined technique of flashbacks. The son of Doc is the photo and cuts in newspaper the news in a box. Then decides to start researching this chapter that his father never told her to write her. For this talk with veterans of war that tell you their vision of the protagonists. At the same time, Eastwood introduces flashbacks within flashbacks to capture the story in first person. An ingenious way to introduce all the visions resulted in flags of our fathers. Not only the technique is perfect, but that the music that accompanies it all (written by the director himself), levels of the faces and the most insignificant details rounded whole. This has not made that start, because soon we will have on our screens the other part of the story. The battle of Iwo Jima from the Japanese side. For the moment, all cry and are looking for our Iggy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2356

El mágico

28 semanas después

muchocine

Not stop falling into the clichés of the genre, that Yes, but takes its time to go armando a line of narration that reaches the climax at the time just and showing at all times as attractive in its conception.

The continuation of "28 days later", which became known in Argentina as extermination, was really expected within the horror genre fans. Here already does not direct Danny Boyle but produces and has invited Juan Carlos Fresnadillo to put hand to its original creation. This director is known for an excellent movie I do not remember that it has premiered here, "Unbroken", and the truth is that it was a good choice to lead behind the camera. "28 weeks later" starts then six months after the virus has ravaged Britain. The United States Army declares that the war against infection has been won, and that the reconstruction of the country can begin. The script follows a parallel route between the images that describe as it was resolving the issue of the virus on British soil and the return of a first wave of refugees to the philosophic London post-epidemia. There is a subject, Don, Robert Carlyle in a solid work, who in a confusing situation to open the movie abandons his wife at the mercy of zombies during the first outbreak that we already know. After his escape, Don will receive their children, who are abroad and returning to District One, which is the security zone free from infection in London in which he is a character with almost unlimited freedom of access. Well, there is the meeting of a family which was separated by the terrible events that took place then, but one of its members carries, without being conscious, a terrible secret, we can anticipate little but you will know before you enter the room that the virus had not yet disappeared completely and this time, it is even more dangerous. The screenplay written by the same Fresnadillo with Rowan Joffe (who comes from American TV and is relatively newbie on this) is very well structured. Not stop falling into the clichés of the genre, that Yes, but takes its time to go armando a line of narration that reaches the climax at the time just and showing at all times as attractive in its conception. There are zombies, marines, deaths, mutilations, sangre.todo you expect a fan of the genre. In addition, there is some correct performance of Amanda Walker and Rose Byrne, between side intense, good photography and a care tempo that makes the film just sits in the body. "28 weeks later" is fast, exciting and how much you want to look at the clock already will be the lights and people coming out of the room.Perhaps I expected a more complete job with regard to the displacement of the Group of survivors in London, but I hope the version of the DVD which, like the previous one, will probably have more extras to enjoy. It is a right product, but only for lovers of the genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2885

Jeremy Fox

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

Future deliveries which will hopefully have a better script, since the subject of the actors (all just middling, being generous) seems untouchable, and a director better than Tim Story that dowry of more pulse to a series that deserves better luck.

My level of excitement prior to the premiere was low. Neither the simplistic posters and trailers had me you forget of the disappointing part.Therefore it is surprising that in the end, the disaster of a priori more interesting films such as "Spider-Man 3" or "Pirates of the Caribbean 3", "silly" entertainment of the summer ends "the fantastic four and Silver Surfer" (Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer).It is not that the film is a wonder, or a lot less. It is full of bad jokes, missed situations, several ñoñerías and, in general, all deficiencies resulting from writing a script designed for children and adolescents rather than for adults. But may not be denied the fact that it is entretenidilla and helps pass the time (hence my description of "silly entertainment").Perhaps the improvement on the previous film has to do with the presence of Silver Surfer, a complex and interesting character is the best of the film and who has been known to give that mystical air that characterizes him in the comics. I have to say that, as a follower of these characters, I'd have been able to enjoy more than Galactus but I understand that they reserve this option for future deliveries.Future deliveries which will hopefully have a better script, since the subject of the actors (all just middling, being generous) seems untouchable, and a director better than Tim Story that dowry of more pulse to a series that deserves better luck.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3342

Iñaki Bilbao

El Asesinato de Jesse James por el Cobarde Robert Ford

muchocine

Unusual and very unconventional Western realistic.

Good western, which however can be considered atypical, very unconventional, so it carries with it.I would like to say that it is not a film from the West to use, with lots of action, shooting and fighting, but it is a reflexive awareness of what was the life and death of the famous raided banks and trains Jesse James. And not only him but the man who killed him in the back.A nothing annoying voice, who hears only at specific times, is telling us what happens moments later, as well as explain the physical problems of the main character. Consequence to a sober address, and Dominik, filmmaker, able to maintain interest at all times, despite its obvious long. Not bored one iota, not tired, but I think Yes it shows its long footage, especially by its quiet and steady pace, which is not slow, but that it slows down when it should, which is most of the footage. There is therefore nervous movements of camera or a riotous Assembly, so that the viewer can absorb, and sometimes taste, clearly shows how much you (the appearance of the train assailed with light penetrating in the forest, the murder itself, endowed with a great tension in spite of knowing what will happen ).Unhurried but without breaks, we are seeing what felt the characters, some characters whose lives hung and depended on the figure of Jesse James, great pope, loved and feared, especially feared by all, and in whose shadow arrimaban. If not happened, if they were emancipated and betray him, let alone would be with them and end their lives "as if it were a formality", as it is in a tragic and violent time.Great performances, with a trio excellent protagonist: Brad Pitt, Sam Rockwell and Casey Affleck, younger brother of Ben, the latter getting transmit, with few gestures but determinants, their psychology, their love, respect, worship by Jesse, and later their fear and hatred or perhaps more animosity towards him.Superb photography that enhances beautiful snowy landscapes and a sunset scene elegant and supple, always at the service of history and not the interpreters and an exhibition of shocking violence, perhaps as few action scenes but full of force and drama, very realistic, far from which they used to watch in the classic westerns of the golden age of Hollywood.Una movie I do not think it lasts too in the billboards to be clear that It is not created to be a commercial success, but that seeing calmly and without haste, it can be a breath of fresh air to a genus which is you are trying to boost and place again at the forefront, not I know if with much success (think "3: 10 to Yuma" is working very well in the USA).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1692

Alex Largo

El último rey de Escocia

muchocine

The film greatly improves with Withaker on-screen appearance. And is that the film comes to what you truly want to tell: the story of the dictator Amin. Instead of a doctor that is going to Uganda...

Ignored that this film has been ignored is truly outrageous. It won the BAFTA for best British film. As I said at the time. Why the Queen won an BAFTA for best film and not the best British film? I thought that "The last King of Scotland" had given him the BAFTA for a little to promote the film. big mistake. the film is far superior to the "La Reina" overrated. The film has very bad moments, and the tape difficult to boot, and is that there are a couple of things that should have fallen in the mount table and slow the story (especially in the beginning).Everything changes when the character of Withaker (Oscar winner for best actor for this film) appears on the screen. And although the real protagonist is the character of James McAvoy, Forest Withaker, leaves all the actors under their shade (especially to McAvoy), although this does not mean that they do you wrong, or at least almost all actors do well with its work.Except for James McAvoy, which turns into the worst of the tape, with a performance which lacks personality, bland like few others, he shows us that he is a bad actor (and ugly). Although more than we can blame him to McAvoy bad makes it, did worse director/ra of casting, choosing this young man that everytime you get only spoil the movie.As we said, the film greatly improves with Withaker on-screen appearance. And is that the film comes to what you truly want to tell: the story of the dictator Amin. Instead of a doctor that is going to Uganda. And it is that Withaker knows to fill the gap of the film (which are few) a brilliantly.The movie is the adaptation of a novel, the novel I don't know, but the script is frankly poor, not bad, but nothing good. The script goes lurching is not a sound basis for the film, and the somewhat forced history occasionally.With regard to the work of the director, Kevin Macdonald, can say that it is good, auque, to my, particularly, I to seemed a little bland, but as I said has done a good job, that although cost him the British Independent Film Awards to my seems to me something dull and lacking personality. But as already said they do well man.Miraculously, the film is very good, especially since the final leg is unbeatable and leaves a good taste. But do not believe that the movie will be for posterity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/325

Tito Chinchan

Cars

muchocine

Long animated film from the factory Pixar would be a work master if not because it is the umpteenth masterpiece from the factory. I liked, but I fails to kill the illusion.

Cars that talk? We humanizamos to motor vehicles? The truth is that the gender of the animation is running out of arguments and increasingly have to think much more to get surprise to the audience. And with this amazing course.The film is about Lightning Mc Queen, a young arrogant and very subidito ego racing car. After a strange career in which solved the Piston Cup, should do a repeat on the other coast of the United States. As it is an unbearable and stupid car, traveling aboard his only friend, but midway lost and ends in a route 66 town, called Radiator Springs. There is sentenced to fix the road previously destroys and, with the help of all the people, gets to change their attitude and the those who surround him.Well, this film I got slightly bored. The beginning I did not like anything, given that everything points to a movie more than those that do not contribute anything. A winner is abandoned by his team and spends the entire film learning the importance of friendship and teamwork. And this I start to get bored. But as he was moving the film, the thing is improving, great secondary characters and the story goes to the front. It has very gracisoso moments, such as tractors and the mower. It has overcome, and tender moments moments of crying and some humor. But will not let be another film of the genre, it exudes moralina and I have far from clear that cale in the children in society. It seems to me that these obvious moralizing already fail and begin to be somewhat tiresome.In short, long animated film from the factory Pixar would be a work master if not because it is the umpteenth masterpiece from the factory. I liked, but I fails to kill the illusion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1427

Tito Chinchan

Muerte de un ciclista

muchocine

Essential film any film lover should have on their shelves. It is not a film only for film buffs stalwarts of whiskers yellow smoking Duchies, if not for a much wider audience, simply looking for a good movie to do a Sunday afternoon.

Not be as long that leads this box in most hidden shelf, without anyone mancillase the impeccable plastiquito Sunday gift that covered. Until today, that in an outburst of love for patriotic cinema, we have taken the scissors after giving seven unsuccessful morsels, and we got the DVD of his involuntary confinement. And what if I am glad I did.The film is an adulterous couple who in one of his trips by car kill an unnamed cyclist. At first, he tries to help, but she convinces him to escape. She is a married woman of upper-class, while he is an Assistant Professor of middle class. At a party who assists her, a friend makes a strange comment, which makes them think that they were seen and that they know his secret. From this moment begins a story about morality, deception and betrayal, culminating in a final apotheosis.Movies like these show the quality of our cinema, which in time could clearly compete with which we came from the other side of the pond. A very well braided history, with parallel plots and characters very well defined, certainly helps the quality of actors. In addition to a great film, it shows an image of the Spain of the time. These differences of postwar which later wanted to deepen, achieving a total boredom in viewers. Here neither judged nor will stop judging, displayed simply social strata, differences and customs, and all that in or eighty minutes. Can who give more?In short, essential film that all film lover should have on their shelves. It is not a film only for film buffs stalwarts of whiskers yellow smoking Duchies, if not for a much wider audience, simply looking for a good movie to do a Sunday afternoon.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1210

Plissken

María Antonieta

muchocine

The film reveals that Yes, that is true, that Sofia Coppola is bored much.

It is as if you were watching. The young, rich and disgusted-of-both-luxury Sofia ends read ' Marie Antoinette: the journey ' Antonia Fraser, is it missing the dreamy air bed, sighs and says "Aish!" I feel so miserable and misunderstood as Marie Antoinette. "I'm going to bring to film his sad life." And will house of Francis Ford and tells him: "Dad, this year for my meets want me gifts to finance a very personal project". And Francis shivers to remember 'Hunch', but when when his daughter tells him "pooorfaaaa", it cannot be denied and produces it the film. "But on one condition, Sofia: do something to give money".And thus (I guess), Sofia is loosely based on the book by Antonia Fraser to tell the side surface of the last Queen of France in 'Marie Antoinette', his latest film and human. The story of a girl of fifteen who lands at the Court of Versailles in decadent splendor against their will, becoming first blank all the whispering and later head of Turkish (never better said) of the bloody French Revolution.But of course, the latter is not what Sophie wants to tell us. What she is interested in Marie Antoinette (Kirsten Dunst on an interpretation which confirms the legend on the blondes) is that it was young, pretty, not liked the protocols, loved go shopping and pelu, leaving party, eat cakes and flirt with young soldiers. Oh, and that was bored much, the poor. Both bored the Coppola torture with an hour and a quarter of "adaptation of Marie Antoinette to the Court" in that same thing happens again and another and again: I wake up, I am going to mass I gossip, I see the Ambassador I selves, I try my husband meets in bed, I sleep. And back to start. Her husband does not case. Their unique outputs for the depre are eating cakes, buying shoes and change her hairstyle (a speech something given to the cliché the yours, Miss Saigon.) (Coppola). Luxury and yawns, everything is one in this part of the film. Only a couple of scenes of these parranda and the character of Asia Argento are saved of the nonsense.After that time and fourth is when Sofia decides to show us the evolution of the character: of down-to-Earth and misguided Princess (really the ' Sissi Empress ', nor is nothing original) becomes Queen of France and mother almost at the same time, suffered a sudden attack of maturity and withdrew to a cottage with his daughter to play the farmers, causing even more yawns among the public. Highlights the plane in which she and her noble friends (her husband not, obviously) walk through a beautiful Lake with an expression of comparable only to my boredom in a little boat at that time. It is the phase "I'm a complicated woman" from Marie Antoinette, that is playing with your child as soon as it is pulling a Swedish officer. Her husband still going for it.For the final stretch, Sofia Coppola has already told everything that she is interested in character, which is already mother and already not spends as much at parties and champagne. so used (now yes) to historical events to wrap up the monarchy and all it represents. This is the most agile part, perhaps because it lasts about five minutes. When it comes to the truth, Sofia does not dare to lower their heroine until the end of the beheading, or fails to insert a map of a room of the shattered Versailles, so that everyone sees what was lost with the revolution. Damn poor, charged to a place and a people as "cool".Apart from such unfortunate vision of a character, Sofia Coppola has a competent operator as Lance Acord, and a production designer, k. k. Barrett, that recreates to the beast the golden cage which was Versailles (with special detail in the food). Actors represent a few dolls snobbish, decadent and carefree with similar Fortune (include Asia Argento, the only commoner of the role, Jason Schwartzman as the Bourbon stunned turn and Kirsten Dunst for his character of encephalogram cuasiplano and because get more cute than normal). And that's it.And at the end one remembers the trailer that plan with ochenteras songs and fast-paced poppy and realizes that that intention corresponds to about 10 minutes from the total of the projection, as the style is pompous and passed out in most of the film. But the Coppola has ignored his father and has been able to sell their vision of the twilight of Versailles as a fashion clip for nostalgic of the synthesizer. At least, 'Marie Antoinette' will not be what 'Hunch' was to his father, and Sofia may continue eating pastries during a good season.Finally, never so few chicha gave to write both. The film reveals that Yes, that is true, that Sofia Coppola is bored much. A 3.5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4320

Ethan

Cartas desde Iwo Jima

muchocine

Eastwood is able to move from the emotive close-ups of the general to the almost ghostly presence of the enemy. Each and every one of them represent the same: death.

"Letters from Iwo Jima" is part of a project of immense proportions - and high quality - which began with "Flags of our fathers" ("Flags of our fathers", 2006) to finish up with this jewel of the seventh art. Clint Eastwood and Steven Spielberg have created a reference future of cinema with two feature films that not only have in common the battle which gives its name to the title, also share the same "tone": a very hard picture, with a low color saturation, touching the black and white; and a continued use of flash-back to project to the present - and the past - what happened on Iwo Jima. Eastwood, Spielberg and Paul Haggis. Each one contributing what better do to achieve a harmonious whole, a masterpiece. Thus, the coral structure, with successive jumps from the point of view; various efectistas resources of acute writer, as the in the "Strip protective" - which reminds the "invisible" costume used in "Crash" (2005)-, are some of the excellent contributions of the writer - and November director - Paul Haggis. Exciting task the discover the elements of each of the two remaining filmmakers. Let's do this: of Spielberg, realism - the whistles of the shot, as in "Saving private Ryan" ("Saving Private Ryan", 1998) and the metallic sound of the guns are very close to the true - and the mix of effects to introduce the Viewer to this hell. But in addition, the "Wizard", insurance that has influenced with his wand to give form to two of the main characters history. One of them is the soldier "in force" (Saigo), alien to this world of horror and anguish false honor. So lost as E.T. on our planet or Tom Hanks in the terminal of an airport. The other character is Colonel of cavalry Nishi. A sensible official, a Schlinder on Iwo Jima that respects their subordinates and also to the enemy, which attends, practically, as a priest - religious staging that both likes the Director-; always in white in the battle (symbol of goodness, but also of death) contrast perfect with the prevailing darkness of the tunnels where resisting the Japanese. Saigo and Nishi have a lot of Spielberg, I have no doubt that the character given to general Kuribayashi is the work of Clint Eastwood. He is the protagonist and comes outside to save an endangered community governed by a bunch of useless. Their harangues, the intimism of the character, the letters, his attitude towards life, everything that fits the personal address of the filmmaker present in some of his best films. That Yes, Eastwood is able to move from the emotive close-ups of the general to the almost ghostly presence of the enemy.To achieve this effect the great director doesn't let us see the faces of any American soldier (with the exception of the injured who engaged in contact with Nishi). The marines are almost unreal - as the protagonists of "Pale rider" ("Pale Rider", 1985) or "Hell of cowards" ("High Plain Drifters", 1973) - are from abroad, almost extraterrestrial beings for the Japanese; their faces are just macabre shadows. Each and every one of them represent the same: death. No doubt the conjunction of the above elements is what gives "Letters from Iwo Jima" important work. Synergy which is reflected in the shiny flat end; which justifies all done previously; which leaves us with such good taste.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2445

Rafa Ferrer

Lo que no se ve

muchocine

Very bad, thriller that starts well and ends painfully.

Bloody mania have lately in cinema, decorate the movie with best the more strident and heavy music, this film, that baby a thousand similar films, 3rd work in the direction of screenwriter David S. Goyer, is one of those films that covered in the adoslescente terror, mystery and with a small dose of drama, seems more a television telefilm that a "more or less serious" film.Add tape takes to boot, it tries to be transcendental without success, and that tries to even plagiarizing the grossing and later "Ghost" without coming to this, or the soles of shoes.Interpretive plot have Marcia Gay Hayden (the only known of a rather than unknown distribution), that every day is old and damaged, go, age do not go well for his already wrinkled face.The argument goes twisting until you reach the most supine stupidity, and one ends, the time and peak of footage, twisting in the armchair and waiting for the closing credits.And look that he could have seen any other film and I've opted for this, send eggs.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2125

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Bailar en la oscuridad

muchocine

Review of the musical under the Prism more light of the Dogma or, in other words, a peliculón worthy to be included in the bombastic and fascinating history of the seventh art.

Turbulent atmospheres from where comes the miracle of the image: dancing in the dark is a dazzling visual poem, a delirious cacophony iconographic where less matter the ride of the characters that the sensations they feel and how explicit them, how capture the viewer's attention and embaucan it (that must be pure cinema or pure literature)(: deception, sleight, fantasy assembled with sanity) that, in the end, entranced by the flow of emotions, let him stricken in the armchair, knocked out.Lars Von Trier closes the Golden Heart trilogy (breaking the waves, the idiots and now this dance in the dark) with this melodrama with contours of this melodramatic musical or musical, fascinating vehicle for an actress rookie although sufficient in a role intended for his histrionic and shameless divismo. Björk is Selma, the Czechoslovak immigrant blind rompe in pain that his son does not suffer his same disability. The greedy neighbor steals the money he saved. Selma murders. And it is judged in an American Court. That it seems that I'm telling the film: nothing has been said. Anything that does not come more extensively developed in the DVD tab or the usual chronicles in magazines or on the Web.What love of this film is its premeditated stripping of all theatrical artifice. Not in the style of Dogville or its logical sequel, Manderlay, but obeying the same visual pattern.The tragic heroines of Von Trier (breaking the waves is an ingenious hybrid between religious and erotic feminist film between Bergman and Dreyer) are angels who aspire to heaven and must travel a true journey on Earth to deserve this award. Selma seduces by its epic nature: Björk employs what better do (compose, sing) for seasoning the dramaturgy of the film with dressings of poetry. The own face of Icelandic singer is the best claim of innocence, goodness and the naivety of Selma. We do not we would understand the tape without the winged, fluid, mystical presence almost of this actress not exploited, who has not returned to the film and that was perhaps only intended to represent Selma, the alter-ego who lives his happiness in their own way, of eyes for inside, fantasy and his pure love of madre-coraje struggling to overcome the convecionalismosthe severity of the society and the injustice of the system. However, there is no political border. This is a musical: an original nauseam.The whiteness of the human, the beauty of the soul and the fragility of the human emocines faced to the tenebrism of fear, darkness written by men for suffering of man.Or life is very sad, in the background, and requires the eye candy of dance numbers and the lyric of the melodies to return it the fugal joy. You only have to see in detail, jubilantly in the detail, the scene of the train with the circus dancers on the road, to us already convince the genre can be rewritten often make is missing and not died in West Side Story or leaden designs for adolescents as Grease.Hay films that don't ever forget you like little or you fascinated. This deserves to go into the chapter of the immortal films in memory. Because of the pain it causes. For the suffering reverberado skin of Selma to the artificial screen of a cinema and hence, in magic acrobatic Pirouette to the more sensitive neuron you have. Or as them it melts you all.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2729

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La buena estrella

muchocine

Ricardo Franco carefully nurtured country these three distressing characters always bordering the pathos, the undeniable harshness of a life in solitude and the negation of all joy, abismada victims of the tyranny of the heart.

A wounded man writes better about the nature of his injury. Something like this should think Ricardo Franco when Pedro Costa proposed it burn the good star. Almost blind, sick, vulnerable, Ricardo Franco filmed La buena estrella, the misadventure of the manso, the one and the pretty face with intimate satisfaction be narrating a complete work, literary adhesions and incontrovertible hardness. As life itself. It is not possible that isn't hard life when you aspire to find happiness and only find disenchantment, desolation, hardship and moral misery. All this should think of Rafael, the butcher, (Resines), a good person, a man without qualities to what Musil which zarandea his routine life of neighborhood with the arrival of Marina, a pregnant prostitute (Verdú), which he hosts, mima and considers the fundamental step to build a family. What otherwise, he wondered. Daniel (Molla) is the offender boyfriend, the hanged man, the necessary evil for the goodness of the history avails itself to the traditional mechanisms of the melodrama, which here are nobly amplified, written with grief, played with heart and served in a filmic device impeccable, oblivious to the passage of time, soaked sentiments as few films. This very crude x-ray of pain is also the Testament formidable (black tears not was completed entirely) of a man devoted to the film and to the diffusion of culture as something great. Let me not explain otherwise. Ricardo Franco carefully nurtured country these three distressing characters always bordering the pathos, the undeniable harshness of a life in solitude and the negation of all joy, abismada victims of the tyranny of the heart and patients Guinea Pigs their sad litany.And still I do not know anyone who has seen the movie without a lump in the throat. And today, not being this enthusiastic chronicler of his eyes in the patriotic film, I have not seen more poignant movie. You can make a movie with these twigs, but not a more lyrical.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/470

Tito Chinchan

Kebab connection

muchocine

Camouflaged after a kind of sticky drama, we have a very enjoyable script that touches many sticks. a film that touches the fiber and makes you feel better human being.

There are films that not filling cinemas or that not even pirating. They are films that have small cartoons of worldly people (or not so much), next to us. There are some that are tremendous peñazos, there is no who Digest. But there are also other very lively with a good script make us enjoy. And this is one of them.The film is a German Turkish guy who dreams of being the first head of a German kung-fu film. To start and get some publicity, made an announcement to his uncle for his kebab shop (the announcement must be seen, imperative) which is a great success and he promises a great future. But not everything in his life goes well, given that she leaves pregnant girlfriend German, which makes his father to antagonise.Good, good, good, good movie we saw the weekend. Camouflaged after a kind of sticky drama, have a very enjoyable script that touches many clubs, but unfinished deepen in none. We have social relations that exist in Germany between Turks, Germans and Greeks. The problems of the Turks with the paternity (with assume certain roles). The problems of young directors to get producers of parents and children who come to be worldwide with their subtleties and couples facing maturity suddenly. All this with much humor, sometimes subrealistas, but that take you quickly the smile. And we even have very emotive moments and some other parodies.In short, a very good and pretty, film that the chord and makes you feel better human being.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/998

Jeremy Fox

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Two hour thriller with certain doses of action, not much for a weekend afternoon entretenidillas

Tony Scott is, in my opinion, a correct director with some skill to the frantic Assembly. Sometimes offers the best of himself and come out you good films like "The last boy scout", "Love at point-blank range" or "Spy Game" and sometimes get you worse, but in general, qualities as yours one can only aspire, it is no longer little, directing commercial tapes of those who entertain for a couple of hours and then forget. "Déjà vu" is of the latter.I will not go into details about the synopsis of the film. Let me just say is research Doug Carlin (Denzel Washington) carried out to stop the terrorist that exploded a ferry in new course Orleans.Por, the title already gives clues about this, the time travel will play his role in the film. But that nobody will break the head thinking about travel in the time seriously because it makes no sense. We are before a Hollywood product that aims to entertain and not a treaty physicist or mathematician. And as a result, although simple, it works.Despite this simplicity you mention, it must be acknowledged that not missing the story elements of a certain originality. For example we are witnessing one of the most peculiar persecution that have been. At least on paper, because in images is shot with disdain and simple correction losing all the strength of the idea. The same could be applied to the rest of the film.With regard to the actors say that Denzel Washington meets in its role of police like so many other times, Val Kilmer shows that it is perfectly interchangeable with Alec Baldwin, Paula Patton is very pretty but little else and James Caviezel reminds us that the Platypus and pirado fan is a role that likes to interpret.Not me roll it up more because it's not worth. Two-hour entretenidillas thriller with certain doses of action, not much for a weekend afternoon. If that is what you want, in "Deja Vu" you will find it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3713

Rafa Ferrer

Lucky You

muchocine

A myth as Curtis Hanson film, is increasingly on the further decline and their stories or reach the public or even scratched the surface of the consciousness of the Viewer; hard, but real.

The first thing is that me I pulled much of the promotional period of the tape thinking that the last film by Curtis Hanson was a romantic comedy, and is that I can not, it is to see Drew Barrymore on screen and thinking that this is the umpteenth such tape starring the singular "ET blonde", but no, we have a tape of PokerI play I do not know and that much who has played to the Mus in my life, I have not the slightest interest learn and/or know.Especially when the tape, like in the long and heavy legal movies, based on dialogue in the game, much of their "action" table, less evil than Eric Bana, actor that I have in great esteem from "Chopper", "Hulk" and "Munich" (where he finished enrapture me completely and show me that it will be one of the great, so no more), and Robert Duvall, which is of these actors are only appear briefly on screen since pays one invested (time/money) to see for there acting, even makes someone normalucha as Debra Messingaqui shine with their own light as sister of co-star; attention to the cameo from Robert Downey Jr. (which in not long known as "Iron Man"), in addition to the promising title of credit to the sound of The Boss Springsteen.El landscape of Las Vegas, which both us we have become accustomed, both the series and the movies here is one character, and we also have the incentive that much of what it hasis already known in advance by the Viewer from the sources of the Bellagio, passing through the streets of the city of Nevada (Aragon raises open something like) the problem that I see in the tape, which, even with an exceptional argument and a distribution fairly well committed is the sensation of knowing too much in advance what will be happening in the development of film, and is that this mania so recurrent that he now has to fall over and over again in common (recognizable by all) places are rutilantemente stupid, and get that, following the submission of the characters the tape go deflate is losing interest, as well as emotion and getting that in 2 hours of footage, history throws any surprises why this mania of longer stories than perfectly you can count on less footage?In short: A myth as Curtis Hanson film (theirs are "LA confidential" and the despised "8 miles") is becoming increasingly more fall layer, and their stories or reach the public or even scratched the surface of the consciousness of the Viewer; hard, but real.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/502

Red Stovall

Gracias por fumar

muchocine

Correct, with enviable technical quality, but not wet all what make us see.

We live in times in which the power of the word is everything. Continuously bombard us with lies that we believe because we have been told them well or they have simply been kind while they told them us using beautiful words. Demagoguery is one of the greatest evils of our time, because of it we are able to justify murder, rape or invasions to a country. A perfect speaker is the King of the world in front of a camera saying great phrases and putting thoughts into the heads of the stupid who do not know or want to think for themselves. Of course, that there are good speakers and other bad, those who say the truth and those who lie. All this could be the item dealing with 'Thank you for smoking' but framed within the tobacco industry and its relationship with the people, potential consumers and those who are not. Is it good to smoke? It is bad for the health? I will leave my son to smoke? I sue the tobacco company if I discover I have to bring my life cancer smoking? do I see you a thousand times 'The dilemma' to know what I have to do? On these stupid questions, except the latter course, it this film with satirical touches.Nick Naylor represents the tobacco industry in the USA in the face to the public. He tries to inform the society of the outcome of the studies on tobacco by large companies. His work is not lying, but disguise the truth, filter it diverting attention, something that always has been given very good coming out triumphant of all the problems that have been involved. One day he meets a journalist who wants to do an interview to find out his secret weapons. At the same time, an important Senator intends to present a law requiring tobacco companies to put a label on cigarette packets that puts the word "poison".The film has been directed by Jason Reitman, son of one of the most infumables directors of the Decade of the 1980s, Ivan Reitman, which has few notable films. It is still early to tell, but it gives the impression that the son has not inherited the talent of Fr. Fortunately. Reitman does demonstrate a use of the pace really exemplary. The film does not have even a downturn and progresses as quickly as the protagonist speaks. And it is that we are talking about a movie in which the word is everything. The central character would be lost and would not be as interesting if not a master in the use of the words. And while it is the typical charlatan is presented to us in a way that we like and we care about their personal problems, because at the end and the place is one person like other anyone. And behold one of the successes of the film, although many will say that no, a character we should hate for what makes us like. The film achieves the same as his main character, he convinces people that the tobacco is not bad. The film convinces us that he is a good person, a leader, someone who we need.' thank you for smoking ' is full of familiar faces, more or less famous actors which do all good work, especially Aaron Eckhart, absolute protagonist and perfectly made up a character who knows what to say at all times always using the right words even if you know in advance what defends is wrong. Maria Bello in a very short role is also very well, like the other characters, some of the most curious, as the agent of Hollywood portrayed by a funny Rob Lowe (who would say that this actor could do something good); William H. Macy as a Senator obsessed to destroy the reputation of Nick, Katie Holmes as a reporter that bundles with Nick would be the only weak point of all the cast, and is that Mrs Cruise has never been very well endowed for interpretation; Robert Duvall showing all their experience into a character a tad missed, Cameron Bright as the son of the protagonist and first time this actor not interpret a rare child, Sam Elliott makes the cowboy that appeared in an advertisement for tobacco ill with cancer, and which indeed is the all think, but with the name changed and the brand of tobacco also, and j. k. Simmons who is splendid as the head of the protagonist.But the film is not much less perfect. Despite his excellent pace, its well-kept phrases in the script and his almost successful cast, the film stays halfway in its intention of being different, daring and scathing. It could you have been much stronger than it is, having gotten the finger in the wound to the bottom and not staying on the surface a little digging. On the other hand, the story is somewhat predictable in its final part and some topics that make you lean towards the usual: character with dubious profession but with incredible talent to do so and to question their moral principles. I think that the film should not have followed this path and Yes more inquire into the part of the story shows us what is a tobacco company capable to defend his business.A correct movie, with enviable technical quality, but not wet all what make us see. Still, it is an interesting and very entertaining product within the current film scene in the USA, and of course makes us have the watchful eyes on its director, I hope not engaged in antics that made his father, who by the way has released among us 'My Super girlfriend', which if approached me to see it will be only to see Uma Thurman.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2944

Andrés Pons

Dead silence

muchocine

Void narration where the 20 minutes you know everything that will happen, accompanied by a surprise ending that causes only the general messing.

Let's see! When in a horror movie you have to fear is a fucking doll that seems the fucking MACARIO wrong walk, what truly gives dread is that anytime leave happily José Luis moreno.The creator of SAW a cheater film made by the grace of it is not known who in one of the most successful works of the current film shows what many presagiamos. Something as simple as his enormous mediocrity does not know narrating an interesting script at any time. Sounds of volume a toda mecha, interpreters that they should not leave school of interpretation. With face of stick walking el inútil de DONNIE WAHLBERG "SAW 2" painful but beautiful actress AMBER VALLETTA "seen on HITH" in site of panic seems part, thing totally understandable because banter has the assassins.This issue was previously discussed in very enjoyable films like infernal dolls "MAGIC" here is literally torn one-way flat, a non-existent narrative where the 20 minutes you know everything that will happen, accompanied by a surprise ending that causes only the general messing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2209

Antoni Messa

Tideland

muchocine

One of the more contentious and controversial of Terry Gilliam films. A title difficult but vision compulsory, even of those who remove the Undercity.

It seemed impossible to come brand new in Tideland Spain, one of the most contentious and controversial of Terry Gilliam films. But, luckily, comes already the product of monty American python from his pass for the Festival of San Sebastián, has created controversy over those places in which has been planned to our screens. And it is, as says its own director, before Tideland should take sides; or for or against him. There is no term means before so committed like this work. Due to its particular style and the harshness with which exposes certain topics, hardly his vision can leave anyone indifferent.The film, in a very specific sense, keeps a clear and large parallel with El Laberinto del Fauno that, like Guillermo del Toro, Gilliam has focused on the child world, translating into screen surreal fantasies that come to the mind of a 9 year-old girl when he is trying to escape from the daily horror that he lives.Jeliza-Rose is the name of the small cover of the Alice of Lewis Carroll, who stars in the film: a young girl who has grown up amid a hellish atmosphere and, raised by a couple of junkies, will depart in the company of his father, to distant lands, after the death of his mother from an overdose of methadone. Entering this deep arid America, father and daughter will be installed in the abandoned and lonely House property which had been her deceased grandmother. There, taking advantage of his father's endless holidays, Jeliza-Rose expanded his hermetic universe dolls decapitas and syringe, to establish contact with the peculiar inhabitants of a nearby mansion.Terry Gilliam, through this minimum argument, Orchestra a visual delusion in which witches, deformed beings, stuffed animals and hungry sharks will surround the macabre playground of Jeliza-Rose. A provocative touch of black humour and certain perverse aftertaste by eschatology, are the clear symbol of a filmmaker who likes to warp reality through large angular and twisted plans. And there, in the same epicenter of this show Dantesque and prohibited to minors, shines with their own light Jodelle Ferland, the girl who, through a tour de force outstanding, gives life to the dreamy girl who wielded his parents nurse for too many years: a brilliant interpretation that even makes less than a Jeff Bridges cloths immense (though near in the histrionics).Some catalogarán Tideland as one of these common (but magnificent) rants of its director. But, in my view, they fall into a profound mistake. It must be approaching Tideland gradually, cautiously, prepared to read honestly the proposal of Gilliam, behind these apparent hallucinogenic battering, is a huge and painful reality that many will refuse to recognize. A daily reality, unfortunately, very close to all; one of these realities that we want to eliminate the social map wielding the baton of false morality that both dresses today. And it is precisely those who practice this double (or false) morality, they will those who flee lament cinema to half an hour of starting the slide show.A wonder that arrives at our country with the misleading label of misunderstood. A tender praise to the mental strength of the smallest of the House. A unique and splendid film. A fierce and crude provocation ideal to awaken dormant consciences and eyes closed. A true work of art created by a kind brave and full of brilliant ideas. In short: a title difficult but vision compulsory, even of those who remove the Undercity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3661

Bruji

Mr Brooks

muchocine

Perhaps the failure of Bruce Evans has been writing a script over ten weeks to entertain for two hours and be forgotten in five minutes.

The particular Doctor Jekyll and Mister Hyde Evans and Gideon is an entertaining thriller tracing intelligent that, low hours, throws hand of three great glories of Hollywood to continue. The experiment works to become one of those stories that inhibit critical sense to not give option to thought. Remember to the Addams?. There was a funny scene in which the great Christina Ricci (Wednesday) attends a costume dance with his usual attire. "I'm dressed as a psychopath," he said, "because all psychopaths have a normal appearance". And this appreciation was not without basis. If we delve in the biography of some of the more "charismatic" serial killers in history, we discover that there is no shortage testimonies that define them as normal, educated and absolutely charming beings. Education and charm, in the hands of the writers of Mr. Brooks, reach unimaginable heights, to the point of making the human and psychological profile of the facet of Dr. Jekyll, which becomes indispensable to personify the conscience to give depth to the dark side as credible. The entrance scene of that personification, - that already appear in some movies by Wim Wenders as the sky above Berlin or Tan Lejos Tan Cerca!-, is so surprising as the rest of events that make up the plot. Sitting the databases and precise with a focus of all its components, is imposed a kind of vertiginous script, frantic, with multiple twists that do not offer concessions or crowds out the reflection. Close to other stories that populate the sky film, since it is easy is sometimes perceive the dramatic intensity of Seven, the light of resurrection passages recreation or the timely phone call in which "the world is more interesting with you inside, Clarice" of the silence of the lambs; many others, far from all of them. For its part, the techniques used in filming and production design enhance the creation narrative, while the profusion of fast planes, impeccable planning in photography, scenic alignment, the own artistic direction and perfection in the Assembly, contribute to enlarge the deceptive final result. To make matters worse, the successful recruitment of Kevin Costner faces a new twist ending in the delirious annulment of the critical sense. At least, on my behalf. And it is that it does not matter the evolution of events, the resolution of the plot or the luck run the characters, while he continues on screen. How difficult to understand is that it is precisely now, in this film, when they begin to recognize their important interpretative qualities, the same as others always had detected and admired. Costner-Brooks is not unlike Jim Garrison, Prosecutor of New Orleans, who jugueteaba with his glasses on the open case of JFK by Oliver Stone; or the untouchable Eliot Ness irresistible; or the controversial fugitive from A perfect world; nor tender lover of message in A bottle; It is even different from the troubled professional who fell in love with to girls of a whole generation with the bodyguard. Kevin Costner has always acted in Kevin Costner, leading to each and every one of their characters to their own land, that where so sure it feels and always lifted blisters among many sectors critical. The perfect riposte to his final performance, can be found in this abstract entity that gives life a William Hurt who may never have this role among the best of his interesting career. Their interventions, many of them collected through the mirror of a car, are kept within the correction more absolute, but far from the magic that used to print his characters in the past. Of course, not forgetting, one of the most camaleónicas stars of American cinema which, after many vicissitudes and giving the already by lost, again to emerge with such wisdom to make it big in movies such as Striptease or the Lieutenant O'Neill. Together with them, one of the great promises of the contemporary cinema, Dane Cook, in what may be his final takeoff. And after one hundred and twenty intense minutes of footage that does not accommodate the boredom, the nightmare of Mr. Brooks begins to leave the film. It is not the time, recovered from the hypnotic trance in which cleverly has made us fall director, we recall the words of the Mexican Alejandro González Iñárritu, basically they said that "If a story doesn't do a catharsis in the Viewer is that something has failed". Perhaps the failure of Bruce Evans has been writing a script over ten weeks to entertain for two hours and be forgotten in five minutes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/239

Tito Chinchan

Declaradme culpable

muchocine

Entertaining film for the personal showcasing of Vin Diesel

This Vin Diesel rare makes to me with hair. And face fool that you have. By the way, the sofa in the cell is true, it is good.The film is a mafioso who is jailed for reasons which are not the case. While in prison, is involved in one of the biggest legal cases of the United States. In it, he accuses an entire family of 76 posts (well, variaditos). As Vin Diesel belongs to that family, also drop you something. Total that each character in the family has a lawyer, except Vin who decides that he will defend him alone. And so, without knowing laws, is dedicated to crazy to the Prosecutor and the judge at the same time to enrapture the jury.Indeed, the film is nice. Vin Diesel shows that it is not only a bag of muscles, if that has no more records as an actor. It embodies a sympathetic mobster who is disowned by his family (mobster) but that he, as a man of honour defends them. The pace is somewhat slow, with fun moments but with many authentic roll. The script makes interesting, more in the case of a real case. This makes us doubt much of the usefulness of the jurors, given that a simple graciosillo can tip the balance of justice. The other characters do very well, although they are unknown entirely.In short, entertaining film for the personal showcasing of Vin Diesel. In addition, it gives us the possibility of reviving the longest trial up to that point.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/927

Oscar Cantero

Casanova

muchocine

Lacks it a bit of dynamism, what may be due to the little habit of Hallström to direct comedy, anyway, to have a good time, is an acceptable option.

It seems that the life of Casanova is one of these inexhaustible sources that supply the producers and directors to make one version after another. On this occasion, responsible for this has been the Swedish, Lasse Hallström, who already occupied this space a few months ago with "An unfinished life" and that he has a long career in American industry with famous titles such as "Chocolat" or "Las rules of the House of the cider".In carrying out its work, which we must not forget that this is a light comedy and not a historical film, has had an interesting cast, headed by Heath Ledger (Brokeback Mountain, the Grimm brothers or Knight's fate), Jeremy Irons (what about this giant of interpretation) and Sienna Miller, who garnered covers last year to be victim of infidelity of your partner, Jude Law, with the nanny. This time, the master of seduction and the costume is infatuated with a young Venetian writer who dedicated their time and efforts to distribute pamphlets feminist. The surprise, above all for himself, arises when Francesca refuses, which will cause the indignation of the character, which will try to overcome himself pursues one plan after another for approaching his beloved. Special mention deserves, as almost always serving, Jeremy Irons, who masterfully plays a villain of the time. With everything and with that, the movie lacks a bit of dynamism, what may be due to the little habit of Hallström directing comedy, that always moved more comfortable in genres more profound and far-reaching, though in the background behind a critique of moral hypocrisy of those who sought to Casanova by rake when reallyIt seems that it was more envy than another feeling which aroused in them, clerics and ultra-conservative to the world and depraved burghers in the intimacy. In any case, to have a good time, it is an acceptable option.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3539

Iñaki Bilbao

Una canción del pasado

muchocine

Interesting drama with remarkable human cargo and intellectuals, especially literary notes.

Interesting drama with remarkable human cargo and intellectuals, especially literary notes.The film is a good adaptation of the novel by Ronald Everett Capps. A history of secrets, mistrust, lack of affection and family memories, reproaches, redemption and love.The interest is on the rise according to spend the minutes that at first it takes to catch a little the tranquillo characters. We will little by little understanding them, as they relate each other. But it is true that costs a little enter situation, inter alia by the large but necessary and particularly consistent, provide intellectual, with abundant literary quotations, for whom is not placed in this, it can mean a setback in what regards to concentration. These appointments are, as I have said before, completely coherent, not in vain the two male protagonists are writers and for them the books are more important than the vida.o perhaps not.Good dialogues, a sober staging, without technical fanfare, with a very accomplished use of music and a beautiful landscape of New Orleans, although they cause real pain knowing how were and perhaps they remain, some of them after the catastrophe of the Katryna.Pero, without a doubt, the best of the film are its protagonists, above all John Travolta, perfect in his self-destructive charactera paragon of defects but intimate and emotional. "Scarlett Johnasson brings a certain maturity to his character and the plot, despite his youth, and the third in discord, the for me unknown Gabriel Macht, secunda les perfectly.""A song of the past" will not go to the history of the cinema, but that is a good showcase of human strengths and weaknesses that leaves a good taste in mouth, although it has its formal defects. But the dignity conferred the various characters of the film are sufficient to respect and give a positive mark.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3143

Rafa Ferrer

El niño de barro

muchocine

A terrifying story, based on real facts, makes me to reconcile me with the national dramatic film and at the same time with the arrival of Argentina.

When the movie premiered I liked that that while they shot the kid protagonist happened it really wrong in filming, and that gave him much fear history, and spent much of the same dead from fear, that I gave foot to interest me, not in morbid, but because if the small protagonist spent fear is that both had "quality" in the shooting, as in the story.That, before we talk about anything should be traced back to the Argentina of the last century, where a boy of 10 years known as "El Petiso Orejuno" he had, not only in check to the Argentine police, but also to all parents in the city, which could not rest assured knowing the vicious beast that walked through the streets.We have in this Argentinian co-production, Maribel Verdú (back to a papelón after "El Laberinto del Fauno") and Chete Lera (which always remember as a doctor of "Open the eyes" of Amenabar), as well as an excellent roster of Argentine actors, among which noteworthy newcomer Juan Ciancio, who was the child that was badly spent in filming.Both costumes, such as photography, and lighting (forgiving a small mistake at the beginning most of the film), the rest of this very accomplished, aside from the excellent recreation of Buenos Aires from the beginning of the last century (1912).Ultimately, a terrifying story, based on real events, which makes me to reconcile with the national dramatic film and at the same time with the arrival of Argentina.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/192

Pablo

Extraños en un tren

muchocine

Hitchcock resurgio from the ashes and strangers on a train became one of his most personal works

A young and handsome tennis player from success, Guy Haines, is approached by an admirer, Anthony Bruno, in the course of a journey by train. This known to detail the private life of Guy and proposes to commit a perfect crime: an exchange of murders that would mislead altogether the police because the two would have an alibi at the time of the murders for which Bruno would eliminate the insufferable wife of tennis player, who refuses to grant him a divorce and prevents him from marrying the woman who really wants to and Guy, in return, would do the same with the possessive father of Bruno. Despite the refusal of the first, who thinks that everything is a simple joke, Bruno carried his Machiavellian plan and mercilessly kills the wife of Guy. Thus, without hardly noticing the young tennis player will be involved in a crime unresolved that you become it the main suspect for the police.After the failures of his two previous films, Hitchcock was in a delicate moment of his career that was not any history that was to his liking. A good day got their hands on a novel by Patricia Highsmith, who seemed to be written for him: a history of exchange of murder which addressed two of his favorite themes: the study of the malignant part of a model citizen and the figure of the false guilty. So Hitchcock resurgio from the ashes and strangers on a train became one of his most personal works. A tense, elaborate and shocking thriller which managed to penetrate the dark side of the human being to discover us a dramatic split in its interior, a demonic double who always travels with us and we believe controlled and therefore voluntarily forgotten but that coincidentally can become evident, introducing chaos and darkness in a world apparently tidy and bright. The character of Farley Granger would like to really get rid of his wife, but his "alter ego" scary is who resolves you the ballot. We can say that Guy and Bruno interpret a same character split in two.The film also features several famous and memorable, moments as the first sequence of the shoes, the killing reflected in glasses of the victim, the harrowing scene of the cigarette lighter in the sewer. but perhaps the most spectacular and exciting comes from the killer carousel, which reveals the estrema technical skill of Hitchcock. I read in a book that the actor who plays the Lord who gets under the carousel with the intention of stop it arrisegó really his life. In the words of Hitchcock: "If that man had raised a little the head." "never would have forgiven me it".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4223

Rafa Ferrer

La guerra de Charlie Wilson

muchocine

Mike Nichols puts actors, the script, and an excellent plot and without too many Fireworks made up an excellent movie of those that manage to excite and make think at the same time

New film nominated to the Oscars, this time in the category of best supporting actor chooses where to prize the great Phillip Seymour Hoffman, a Ribbon of coral, of those that make reflect, is that one who already knows what happened a few years later, cannot more than surprised and think that the efforts of Charlie Wilson to help Afghanistan and the mania of USA go "saviors of the universe" once again, and without that serve as a precedent, would return against, we all know what finally Afghanistan have dedicated themselves to do, and not I who unleash or open the box of Thunder.The cast is wonderful, with Tom Hanks in a permanent state of grace and achieved almost from the first moment that appears on screen, that you confabules with him and the history, then we have Julia Roberts, enormous, and his role that of the typical away where we have always seen; I understand that by Mrs. Roberts I feel something special and make what you do to my I'll love, while Dona Julia already begin to appear mayorcita on-screen or was only his role?On the other hand we have nominated Phillip Seymour Hoffman, and the recently emerging Amy Adams that we have seen in plenty of tapes as secondary and now thanks to this Disney's "enchanted" beginning to bring a career more or less dignified (and linear).Mike Nichols puts actors, the script, and an excellent plot and without too many Fireworks made up an excellent movie of those who, as I have already said, manage to excite and make think at the same time, although I would have ended it as they wanted to have done with a map or a visual reference to the terrible events we are now experiencing.We can see a kind of James Bond political, that same thing in Tom Hanks as Charlie Wilson fried a tie as iron an egg, histrionic, mastódontico and knowing at that time say the right word or the perfect puya to leave amazed spectators.It is true that towards the middle of the film inevitably, a small drop of rhythm, where it seems that the action stops and nothing happens that would be worthwhile, fortunately the tape later launches vacuum towards its end, for all (more or less) known.In short: One of the great films of last year in USA, once again and without that serve as precedent arrives late to our bulletin board, and drawing the pull of the Oscars.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1086

Calaf

Babel

muchocine

A mixture between Crash and Lost In Traslation. 4 stories dramatic, with solitary confinement as a theme, that if not for the non-linear way of tell rozarían a uppercase simplicity.

Last night I went to see Babel, the last of the Mexican Alejandro Gonzalez Iñarritu (21 grams, Amores Perros). Without wanting to be exhaustive, Babel is a mixture between Crash and Lost In Traslation. They are 4 stories that touch. One very slightly, which takes place in Japan, and dealing with the emotional problems of a young sordomuda who lost her mother. The other three misfortunes are fruit more or less by chance, in a bad way (as in Crash). But the stories, although more realistic that in one, they are simpler, and if it were not because they are told in a non-linear manner, would be simplistic cheap film dramas.In fact, despite the realism of the setting (the best for my), failed to excite me. Even the suffering of Mexican history seemed a bit absurd how produces.I can still say that the movie not displeased me. It is clear that the director knows mood situations to make the viewer feel like their characters. The disco in Japan scenes are an example, or the agustia of desert along the Mexican border.In short, 4 stories dramatic, in 3 places of the world, different as their nationalities, but equally helpless before the basic problems of affection or incommunicado detention. Original by the way of telling it (although if it was linear not be worth much). Rather slow in general by the emotional recreation attempt fails in my opinion, but I am sure that it will please many.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3878

Alvaro Oliva

1408

muchocine

Do with some disturbing point, the film is set on the path of normalcy without being nothing out of this world, and deflate slowly, until you get to a? end? surprise, then let us the sweetened?The End? that you both like.

Again a proposal which, a priori, given us fear. As well, it does not.Based on a short story by Stephen King master, "1408" presented us to Mike Enslin (John Cusack), a horror writer who comes to all hotels that are supposedly ghosts.Bored of not come up with any, reaches Enslin a postcard on the room 1408 in the Dolphin hotel, in which many people have died. So our protagonist is presented with the intention of finding and living unexplained facts.Samuel l. Jackson makes his appearance as the mysterious hotel manager. From here, Cusack will have to face (solo) to almost all of the footage, which will attempt to resist in a room where no one holds live over one hour. Taking different references between the great films of the genre, Mikael Hafstrom, it presents a room in which begin to happen strange things. With some disturbing point, the film takes place on the path of normalcy without being nothing out of this world, and deflate slowly, until you reach a "final" with surprise, to subsequently leave us the sweetened "The End" so much like. In short, a film for lovers of John Cusack and the stories of Stephen King, which disappoint the more ambitious and the horror film enthusiasts, and that will conform to the moviegoers less demanding.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1876

Oscar Cantero

Hannibal: El origen del mal

muchocine

Another turn of the screw more to a story than little more than Yes can give now. A movie for fans of the Cannibal, but little else.

Some years ago, large studies found a new way for huge profit using as I call a great success for a decade or two earlier. If until then old sequelae of these profitable productions, suddenly to someone came up the idea of creating films located in a time prior to the original, rather than the usual continuation of the primeval history. Prequel was the name that received these films, which reached its greatest levels of expectation with the premiere of the first three chapters of Star Wars.Diez years later we got a disastrous second part of the premiere of the silence of the lambs, Hannibal, and just a year later the first prequel of the series, the Red Dragon, which reached an acceptable success among critics and public. Hannibal, the origin of evil recreates the childhood of Hannibal Lecter, and aims to delve into the facts that made him a bloodthirsty killer. Among the most notable changes in this latest installment, highlights the fact that Anthony Hopkins, something logical if we consider that what tells us this time is the childhood and youth of the character does not appear for the first time. The film goes from more to less, starting from a beginning full of force that is yielding to a somewhat weary rhythm that ends with get it is a little long. In general, it seems that rather than explain it is to justify the subsequent conduct of the psychopath, pretending to create emotional ties with the criminal in the Viewer. Neither interpretation nor any technical aspect are not very notable. A movie for fans of the Cannibal, but little else.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2516

José Antonio Bermúdez

The Queen

muchocine

That if it is a devastating portrait of our current society, that ideology of a political crisis, which are of the sign, do always the same: succumbing to the tentacles of power. Once they arrive to rule they feel like Kings.

As the piece of chess, you can walk by the Board as any of the other pieces, with the exception of the caballo.ah, but we do not give greater importance, H.m. Queen Elisabeth II has more appreciation for the deer. The news of the death of Diana in 1997 that shocked the British people nor the bothered. but if imported you at the time in question the its distant attitude to the tragedy. This should not arise the soundness of an institution, as it is the monarchical, anchored in the past. Stay calm. They are politicians. He was Prime Minister Tony Blair, newcomer to the power, who intervened to let him know the Queen who had to set aside his coldness, arrogance and indifference, and share the pain with his people.Stephen Frears builds a caricature of power. Imitating each of the characters involved in the story (from the Prince of Wales to the very same Blair family), splendid starring Helen Mirren as Queen, winner of several international awards. A caricature of the ones above, which represent a country, so if they have been democratically elected or not.In this way, the monarchy is portrayed. You are interested in the people, nor its responsabilidades.sino go hunting, take tea and the Protocol. And not to speak of it, let the good quiet. Frears makes it from within, from the everyday. Concluding that the sole objective of the monarchy is their survival as an institution in a "supposedly" modern world. The death of Lady Di was an earthquake. And who was going to say. The Savior of the monarchy was the labour Blair (the supposedly modern politician who came to the British Government, after years and years of conservatism). It, along with Bush and Aznar, proposed "Save" to Iraq with an invasion. If the monarchy is advocate of their values, with politicians who come to govern a country happens the same. There is the real critique of the film, focusing on the political class that we chose.That if it is a devastating portrait of our current society, that ideology of a political crisis, which are of the sign, do always the same: succumbing to the tentacles of power. Once they arrive to rule they feel like Kings.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4101

Andrés Pons

Boogeyman 2

muchocine

Look for where the psychological factor of the original is changed by the slasher of life in is continuation which fortunately has nothing to do with the above providing a grisly deaths in all the footage where takes place a few excellent makeup effects.

Unsurpassed debut of the editor of various films of the genus JEFF BETANCOURT as working in his facet as in recent successes such as the exorcism of Emily rose or cry 2 among many others.Counting with a cast they Excel where two faces known, RENEE O CONNOR popular for their participation in the XENA series and the protagonist of the saga SAW TOBIN BELL.¿Por puzzle what an impressive debut? Suppose that more than one remembered that unbearable crappy I mean BOOGEYMAN becoming one of the worst years of the genre releases. With these twigs give the realization of a second part did not seem a priori a very sound idea.Look for where the psychological factor of the original is changed by the SLASHER of life in is continuation which fortunately has nothing to do with the above providing a grisly deaths in all the footage where takes place a few excellent makeup effects. Also outstanding photography, the script offers a somewhat more mature reading of which is expected in this type of production.Some characters are clearly something flat that its only function is to be despedazados by the assassin something totally understandable knowing what it is though the set is certainly entertaining leaving the name of the debutante at pretty good place for the future.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3554

Tito Chinchan

Starship Troopers

muchocine

Film about a distant future in which humanity is faced with some giant bugs. Excellent film of pure and simple, fun with very interesting moments, and barely slippages of pace, which makes it a cult classic.

Director: Paul Verhoeven. duration: more than two horazas, but comfortably on the couch happens agustito.Release date: 30 January 1998.Espectadores: 664.288 human beings, but sure that everybody, at least a piece the we will have seen on TV.Films like this remind me much the magnificent game Starcraft, religion in Korea. Moreover, one of the scenes of the movie is sospechósamente similar to a video game. Although surely it is coincidence, given that they are of the same year. Well, also reminded me to Dune by a pair of little scenes, but they are already very geeks. By the way, found me a very interesting film from the point of view of parity. Already understand why.The film is about a distant future in which the Galaxy is colonized and you can live on different planets. Humanity has to deal with the bugs, a species of giant insects which are attacking palautinamente, massacring all what caught (which are currently being human). A group of three friends decide to enlist in the army to fight the bugs and step to obtain citizenship, in different bodies, with the promise of always be friends.This course is a classic unclassifiable, nestled in science fiction that is auto parody with touches of humor, romanticism that sucks, equality of sexes, superiority of humans, extreme journalism, honor, duty and all this mixed in equal parts with cutreces and great special effects. Touching the genius, no doubt. Why I say about parity? That seems to me that scenes like the shower, all together and women drop by mouth worthy of the most seasoned Mason phrases, or that the boss of the human universe is a black woman, without giving importance, is a path without stridency and normalizer of truth, without that it crash. I was delighted. Not so the performance of the girl that plays Carmen Ibanez (her pilot protagonist) that between hair lacquer that you have and how little that gesticulates, seems an awful blur in this great movie.In short, film about a distant future in which humanity is faced with some giant bugs. Excellent film of pure and simple, fun with very interesting moments, and barely slippages of pace, which makes it a classic of worship for my taste.Very original.Besitos.P.D: The news live are great, very acidic, with a revindicativo touch that I love.Pd2: A question that I have I, the oxygen of these spacecraft, is where removed? Not is if they will generate it on the fly, loaded it into the Earth or that. That if in space there is nothing, no raw to generate oxygen. And if I go taking land, will have a moment that it is not more. There is that, as a reflection of the day.P.D.3: Is there a second part (there is talk of a third) that I began to see and when I realized that all the special effects that we were going to get were nothing more than courts of the previous film, I had to remove it urgently. As can tarnish the memory of a great movie with such truño second part? To see if I see her and I can criticize to taste.P.D.4: since this has gone astray, you to know that this is based on a book of the same name. Although according to recognized the director, it has failed to read the tremendous pestiño which is the book, so it only has the name.P.D.5: has who given this hairstyle to the protagonist? We are thus left without an ozone layer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1551

Marta

Dreamgirls

muchocine

Quite entertaining and agile, albeit at the cost of trying to cover too much and not get it more than in a superficial way.

I'm going to refrain from entering the debate about whether "Dreamgirls" is or not a biopic of the Supremes, and if so, whether it is good or bad. The truth is that I know little more than anything about the lives of these ladies, and is not something that remove me the dream. What do I question is that this film version of the Broadway play is also a musical. Because it is not. Or, at least, not during all the time. And why "it thumping" when they begin to sing each other. In a musical code that half of the action will run between the songs and dances of the protagonists, and the content, probably won't be very complex and you're subject to the form you accept from the outset. However, if you begin with a story about a group that strives to reach fame - and reasonably, includes scenes with their actions, continue with a pair of musical dialogues, and finish, again, leaving aside this type of resources, at the end there is one thing that is puzzling. And not only that, but the lightness with which the film passes over conflict is somewhat excessive for anything which - I repeat - is not a musical.Incidentally, "Dreamgirls" is quite entertaining and nimble, albeit at the cost of trying to cover too much and not getting more than a superficial way. Does Beyoncé passes the test without problems, although it is funny that with the promotion of this film happened the same thing which tells it, and that the excantante of Destiny? s Child've done you tantísima shade to Jennifer Hudson, authentic protagonist and a lot better actress. But there are prizes - the Oscar as a CODA - to compensate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3902

Heitor Pan

Encantada: La Historia de Giselle

muchocine

A Christmas movie 100% that can be enjoyed, but leaves the taste of that could have been far more than Yes.

As I mentioned in the previous post, either by the Christmas and colorful in the dates, or acute access of fussiness, the case is that the weekend was presented with an excess of glucose important. The spirit of Disney had infected us as if we were in the camp to which they send to Wednesday Adams and was impossible to escape its influence. So, after the meeting of classical dibus, we went to the cinema to see a fairy tale as they send the canons. Or almost. "Enchanted, Giselle history" is a parody of the classic films of the Disney Princesses. It is the history of Giselle, a princess from drawing lively, cheesy and crazy for kissing the Prince of your dreams, that sing when pose you squirrels and sparrows in the shoulders (should learn from Fiona) and with an ability to out of the ordinary to weave tacky dresses. Of course, her Prince charming lives very close to it, in the magical Kingdom of Andalasia, but just when they know and are on the verge of signing the "happy forever", arises the evil stepmother of Prince to truncate all plans. Fooling innocent Giselle, sends it to a place where there are no happy endings, or what is the same, New York. The Princess of cartoon thus becomes an innocent foreign meat and bone in a world that does not understand, surrounded by people who think that it is as a watering can, looking for a way to return to his world of pens Carioca. Luckily that to help her find a skeptical lawyer and her determined daughter, which will gradually encariñando with the girl, although she to strive in destroy the decoration of the House to prepare new dresses. The film won many points in those parts where the Disney parody takes over the script, showing how different things can be when we moved in the world of animation to the current Usamérica. In those moments, are overwhelmingly the two actors that embody the characters of the tale, the beautiful Amy Adams, which we admire in a role just as optimistic character but with background much more dramatic in "Junebug", which earned him a nomination to the Oscar, and James "cíclope" Marsden, which seems that it is specializing in roles loaded with humor after the musical "Hairspray" and extravagant. Both bring us the best moments of the film, when faced with real-world with their personalities of tale without that you get to be ridiculous. But not everything was going to be autoparodia. Disney is still Disney and the film falls into too many moments in the own house kitsch. The musical number, which in the first bars serves as powerful gag, just transforming as it progresses the film in the classic musical number. It is difficult to fight against business genetics. At numerous times got to ask it would have been of the script if it comes to fall into the hands of the all-powerful Pixar. Surely, we would be talking about a completely different film. On the role of Susan Sarandon as incarnation of the evil stepmother, just has some minutes on screen, insufficient for the showcasing of the actress, who had probably come out with a character with something more than presence. Patrick Dempsey, "Gray's Anatomy" Heartthrob is limited to meet the of his co-stars in a role quite dull in comparison. A Christmas movie 100% that can be enjoyed, but leaves the taste of that could have been far more than Yes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4169

Iñaki Bilbao

Amor en la tarde

muchocine

One of the less distinguished by their superb director titles, though, and it could not be otherwise, exquisite and elegant.

"Paris live happily a detective private already quite major and his daughter of nineteen years, who plays the cello."The father is following the adventures of a damsel that seems to be taking the horns to her husband. And indeed, it puts them with a handsome American, as an adult, very rich and handsome. As the vengeful husband wants to kill the American, the girl warns, beginning an affair between them.He does not know it or what it's called or who is actually. "She, to interest you, puts jealous making him see that many lovers has". One of the less distinguished by their superb director titles, though, and it could not be otherwise, exquisite and elegant. The first movie is with Wilder guionizara the great I.A.L. Diamond, who worked nearly thirty years with the Viennese.Wilder manages to give a patina of class, wonderful photography in black and white film, narrating a somewhat rugged story with hand silk thanks to some elaborate dialogues and some enternecedoras performances. However, it fails him, against all pronósitco, used pace and the character of the protagonist male, interpreted with some reluctance by a too mature Gary Cooper, which seems to be happening is it not very well with his role. But the film is winning as the history is twisted through the jealousy of the bon vivant.And then when I get the mastery in the staging of Wilder, with a simply wonderful ending that excites and moves really. Until then, removing their first twenty minutes, very good, is a hang out with Midlands and allegedly funny scenes, but only stay in Nice, as the Gypsy Quartet (truly Gypsy, because Wilder hired them to see them play at a Parisian cafe) drinking and partying are later going to the sauna to accompany the protagonist. The truth is that it is endearing, Yes, but little fun.In short, a film I think that minor within the Filmography of Wilder, which sets out how the virtue and innocence beats the Vice and evil live.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4376

Ivan Villamel

Flashpoint

muchocine

Pure and hard entertainment, little script, actors who thrive best in violent scenes that introspective, and an impeccable visual aspect, all this in a story that is neither bothers to worry about gaps in logic in the history.

"< DOM:window.onblur =" try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully ()}; catch (e) {} "href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wjWsqh0zy9M/RwE5EuS8VVI/AAAAAAAAApM/z8-nXmyaMSU/s1600-h/Flash-Point-poster-1.jpg "> < img style =" margin: 0px auto 10px; " display: block; text-align: center; "" cursor: pointer; "src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wjWsqh0zy9M/RwE5EuS8VVI/AAAAAAAAApM/z8-nXmyaMSU/s400/Flash-Point-poster-1.jpg "alt =" "id ="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5116433404979336530"border ="0"/ > < /a > this new shows talent for the action of the director Wilson Yip film after its recommended"Dragon Tiger Gate"and"SPL (duel of dragons)", especially the latter, we placed on the skin of two cops in Hong Kongone of them with methods questioned by his superiors, the typical case of use with excessive hardness with criminals, and an infiltrator in the mafia in Hong Kong whose job happens to be the servant boy. During the first section of the film, the film us situated in each of the characters on both sides of the law, all in a very simple way and without fanfare of depth, as it tends to be logical in this type of production, showing us the Group of mobsters, which risks his neck every day Louis Koo as infiltrator, as a group of Vietnamese refugees that have evolved to the point of threatening extortion, murder or the most brutal violence to the Chinese triads.When the ringleader of the Vietnamese mafia group is arrested, and having been discovered just in that moment Koo as an infiltration of the police of Hong Kong, both he and other witnesses of mafia groups are preparing to testify to enclose by their multiple crimes. Thereafter any witness is in danger of not reaching with life the trial, to be held in 3 months. Hard poly character played by martial artist Donnie Yen and Koo should be used to fund not only to kill them, but to survive and reach the trial. < DOM:window.onblur = "try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully ()}; catch (e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wjWsqh0zy9M/RwE45OS8VUI/AAAAAAAAApE/Rj-8nfxWeM8/s1600-h/25656.ss3."JPG" > < img style = "margin: 0px auto 10px;" display: block; text-align: center; "cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wjWsqh0zy9M/RwE45OS8VUI/AAAAAAAAApE/Rj-8nfxWeM8/s320/25656.ss3."JPG" alt = "" id = "BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5116433207410840898" border = "0" / > < /a > posts to analyze the elements of the film, a little in advance must be said that if someone he intends to find a deep and elaborate history of great acting level in this type of production, better that or consider a film like this. The script is schematic until the end, two good cops, a band of thugs, girl poly endangered final revenge. So could be summarized in a few words the new film of Yip. If on the contrary you are fans of this type of film as an evasion, as way to disconnect from time to time of other types of films (such as a server that enjoy a lot with this type of production without pretensions), then "Flashpoint" may be your film. In the good aspects of the film section, once again as in much of the recent Asian cinema, a stunning visual appearance, with a futuristic Hong Kong, with particular emphasis on the Visual aspects, giving the whole a touch very cool, even the costumes of the characters seems derived from a catalogue of urban fashion. The other aspect which justifies somehow if same the viewing of a film of these features is the high level of the action scenes, and go scenes, since then it is clear that there are cinematografias who have virtues in certain genres, and Hong Kong based his action thrillers. A mixture of gangsters films that for years has reigned in this area of Asia (John Woo to Johnnie To great) with a visual appearance and pace would do green with envy to the majority of action anywhere else on the planet movies. And there is its major asset, exceptional planning of all and each of the impeccable action scenes, where they always know where to place the camera to make the fighting so close and physical that they introduce the viewer in full in the middle of all the action.The acting subject is as usual in this type of production just right and very, which does not prevent that history is followed without problems and with a certain empathy with the characters. The Mise en scène by Wilson Yip always seeks the large planes, movements with crane or flat long to precisely the fighting, unlike the film Usa, where ever we learned nothing when there is a fight very physics. make very visual < to DOM:window.onblur = "try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully ()}; catch (e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wjWsqh0zy9M/RwE4tuS8VTI/AAAAAAAAAo8/U3lSDE1a3X8/s1600-h/25656.ss6."JPG" > < img style = "margin: 0px auto 10px;" display: block; text-align: center; "cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wjWsqh0zy9M/RwE4tuS8VTI/AAAAAAAAAo8/U3lSDE1a3X8/s320/25656.ss6."JPG" alt = "" id = "BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5116433009842345266" border = "0" / > < /a > trying to delve more into the serious history of overwhelming futility, because that is what it is, that is what gives us this hilarious (again, for fans of the genre) sample of martial genius of the cinema of Hong Kong, with a sensational Donnie Yen (far are those wonderful days of "Iron Monkey" or the saga of "In the line of Duty")(no that is why Yen loses his abilities despite the age). Pure and hard entertainment, little script, actors who thrive best in violent scenes that introspective, and an impeccable visual aspect, all this in a story that is neither bothers to worry about gaps in logic in the history, because it simply gives them equal. Special attention during its screening to the custom in Hong Kong cannot cut a hair, or an ear, as you prefer, to violent scenes so far.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3688

Calaf

Stardust

muchocine

With both firework in the fantastic films of today, are grateful pearls returning to the essence that never had missed: fantasy, adventure, magic, love.

Stardust is a fantastic film to use, with princes, Star rather than Princess, pirates, witches and many magic.Few buts I get. Perhaps the male protagonist, in line with the new guapitos heroes, but very little thing. The story, still with many secondary elements to get game, draw something ungainly at times. But. little more, because it is well done. Full of excellent characters of distribution (such as the pirate played by Robert De Niro) are adding to a movie that's alone works almost without remedy.You are going to more, with hisses without end, romantic where there and of course. happy.A film which strangely had no advertising and the echo it certainly deserves. If you can, look her where even her exhibited and not miss.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3929

Heitor Pan

Blade runner

muchocine

Is the film a great mix between futuristic cinema, film noir and philosophical proposal on the recurrent themes of Dick, the existence, death, fate? Although, in my simplicity, I am not able to see as much reading as they claim their fans.

It goes without saying that I am not a mega fan of the classic Ridley Scott, with viewings behind me trillion, capable of shredding each scene to get every drop of philosophy to be found behind its attractive images. He had only seen once, for a long time (in the same Galaxy) and the memories treasured when I entered the cinema to see this latest edition of the perfectionist director, were erratic and capricious. Loose scenes, any dialogue, the soundtrack and little else. So it can be said that I've faced in a way almost Virgin (only puntita) to this facelift of Blade Runner, which is why I'm not able to establish significant differences, beyond the obvious absence of the voice that narrates the adventures of Deckard. Surely this creates envy fans of the movie, because already I'd to my that will erase me the memories of such films as "Psycho" or "The coup" to face them for the first time.I do not think that anyone needs that you refresh the argument, but just in case, here's a summary. Very dark and rainy, humans has made progress in such a way in the industry of Robotics and genetic engineering that have been made to produce beings that copy in a nearly perfect way the anatomy and the human mind, better in some respects. These beings, called Replicants, are employed in hazardous work. After being declared illegal on Earth after a mutiny, establishing a body of special forces dedicated to "withdraw". Rick Deckard is one of these Blade Runners, who will have to leave his retirement to locate and remove three particularly brutal Replicants.The film is based on a short story by Philip k. Dick psychoactive and is a great mix between futuristic cinema, film noir and philosophical proposal on the recurrent themes of Dick, the existence, death, destiny although in my simplicity, I can not see as much reading as they claim their fans. What I do see is a stunning visual power, aided in large part by the rare and magnificent "score" of a Vangelis in absolute State of grace, with unforgettable and timeless pieces.We must not forget that "Blade runner" appeared on the screens in 1982, i.e. a year before "Return of the Jedi". If we compare them (aberration, I know, let me leave) in special effects and visual power, "Blade Runner" has aged in a much less evident way. The impressive opening sequence, with a dark, dirty, city vehicles realised furrowing the sky in an ordered chaos, enormous chimneys throwing flames to the charged atmosphere or the approach to the Palace of the creator, a huge technological ziggurat, are scenes that make back many movies made today.Another extremely successful aspect is the blend of the futuristic setting and the gangsters of the 1930s cinema, as this room of police makes that we type in one fell swoop to the time of James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart (the prota is called Rick, just as the character of "Bogie" in "Casablanca"), the persecution of a replicant among the dense city traffic or costume designit contrasts with flying cars or with sable laser handle umbrella. An attempt to offer us a tarnished view of things in a much more advanced world, as if we had already seen all that and not come to draw us attention.A film immortal, with scenes that are adhering to our minds, as the final confrontation between Deckard and the replicant Roy Batty, the final monologue, the premature death of the philosophical Android and the flight of the Dove, a series of sequences so fortunate that they are capable of raising a film to a higher level, placing the film, despite a slow pace and, in my view, in certain occasions too standing on a pedestal in the world of science fiction and a model for long film that came later.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/807

Juan Nadie

El ilusionista

muchocine

Good film of love, revenge and deceit. Especially if one takes into account it boasts an unbeatable scenario, that the novel is set in Vienna.

Magic and love are two impossible to separate closely linked concepts. They say that when the magic ends love becomes affection, but this is subject for another film. Which we are discussing, the illusionist, plays the two sticks but with a reasonable distance. Do the protagonist is a magician, a magician, living of? trick? to those who pay to see him. It entertains them and makes them see things that are not on stage through tricks that we've all seen once and we have tried in vain to decipher. But not only this illusion is that feeds the film directed by Neil Burger, that taps into which arises from love. A beautiful story of adolescent love between a peasant fond of tricks (Eisenheim) and a noblewoman who wants to escape his fate (Sophie). However, the cruel fate oblige them take their separate ways until return to stumble on a stage. He, as Wizard Professional and recognized prestige and she, as the fiancée of the malevolent Prince (Leopold, an alluring Rufus Sewell, who the most friáis remember for Dark City). From there arise a number of encounters and disagreements with inclusive love triangle that lead the old love that is reborn, the defiance of the horned and the fear of what is to come later.The magician, whose argument is that is has the blessed in the title role with Edward Norton, one of those actors who only with his presence fills the screen and capture the attention of the Viewer. At this point in his career (already has 37 spring despite his face of youngster), Norton has little to show after movies like American History X, fight club and the last hour. Although it is true that the paper isn't too complicated, because you need only put face of mystery left in the dressing room secrets which no one must discover, while one of the emissaries of the feared Prince Leopold, which gives life a deception Paul Giamatti fan, try. A success full in the cast as part of two of them, the evil Prince comes round to Sewell, who will simply with his usual look to frighten us into the body. And then there is the girl, Jessica Biel, which we have seen in several television series and is on the road of becoming one of the most desirable, when the whole world is account of his talent. The illusionist is a good film of love, revenge and deceit. Especially if one takes into account it boasts an unbeatable scenario, that the novel is set in Vienna, a city which contributes to mystery that surrounds all the history which dominated by Browns and blacks of the time. The magician enjoys an aesthetic cared to the maximum in which the viewer can accept the invitation to a journey through time that be fooled by a skilled make-up artist of reality as Eisenheim. A wonderful invitation which should not be rehusada by the usual strange thing and Norton. But perhaps, best of all is the regustillo which fits one after seeing. Somewhat similar to experienced after seeing the coup (this wonderful work of public art) or The Score (not so good, but almost). Those who attend the cinema to see will understand it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1514

Jeremy Fox

The Queen

muchocine

Its critical impact is perhaps somewhat exaggerated, but there is no denying that Frears manages to take full advantage of a history which, in principle, did not seem to offer as many possibilities.

"The Queen" is a film which, a priori, because of its subject matter, not attracted me particularly. As it is managed by someone as competent and reliable as Stephen Frears, with one very interesting cast and is supported by some critical success and public I finally decided to see it.The film tells how were the days before and after the death of Lady Di and how affected to the Queen and the Government of his country. As some of my friends will recall, I had the "luck" to live these days in England itself (what memories!) and I assure you that the reaction of the people was amazing.Those moments of overreaction are well reflected in the film, seen always from the point of view of rulers and, especially, the sovereign that, coming from a culture of stoic suffering, not it was to understand what was happening to her around. To add realism, the file images are perfectly integrated into the action and used with restraint, always with a narrative purpose.Stephen Frears is a director of the good, that there is no doubt. But, in addition, it is a very intelligent director who, usually not only obtain some good performances from his actors, but rather you know support them when he has to do. This is one of those cases.It is true that the script is good, focuses on the essentials without neglecting details and brilliantly examines the psychology and the inner world of the main characters, focusing more, as it is expected, in the Queen. But if the choice of actors and the interpretation of these would have been wrong, the project had been shipwrecked big.Everyone, from James Cromwell (Prince Phillip, husband of the Queen) to Alex Jennings (Prince Charles), passing by Michael Sheen (Tony Blair) made some great performances and conform to their characters of perfect form (flame attention how move some actors, tracing impressively to its original).But above all highlights the imposing figure of Helen Mirren, which is not that he interpreted to Queen Elizabeth II, is that it becomes it. His eyes and his gestures transmitted throughout the interior of that woman fight and make it in the center of the film and most memorable of the same. Attention, for example, to the scene of the deer.Despite that and the elegant direction of Frears, tape peca of certain coldness and intranscedencia (someone cares the British Royal family?). I am friend of the coldness nothing because the pirates and smugglers of Moonfleet are passionate people, but I must admit that, in this case, is justified by the subject.Its critical impact is perhaps somewhat exaggerated, but there is no denying that Frears manages to take full advantage of a history which, in principle, did not seem to offer as many possibilities.Moonfleet.es rating: 7 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1792

Rafa Ferrer

El buen alemán

muchocine

Current tape, passed by the classic tapestry that reconciles the lovers of contemporary cinema, with the of the classic film, an easy way to make a link between both styles.

In one of my sleepless nights, I found myself (who was going to be but) watching a programme of canal +, therein, a critic of film, Carlos Boyero for more sign, desbarataba thousand and one films, talked about because this man the tape that now brings us, viciously, with hatred and speaking of as Soderbergh had transmitted on screen a true reflection of the classic film, that server is not a follower, and is that viewing this tape, from beginning to end, one feels attracted to a nearly obsolete, old cinema that shone for the years beyond 50.Tal time, the argument and the mystery shines by its absence, and admittedly, at times one is left apabullar by the images and the master of the "tracing" and bit by what happens on the screenSince in some momenos it comes to seem dull, boring and intrasdencente.Clooney, alma mater of the project, listed as illustrious protagonist, accompanied by a Tobey McGuire that it is difficult to separate from the character that has made globally famous (I was looking for the moment in which, although the suit opened in black and white and trepara by the walls of Berlin), Cate Blanchett, in a role that could have perfectly interpreted those heroines of the film noir", this expléndida in his role, with some dark contact lenses to hide her beautiful blue eyes, can not forget me coral, secondary cast including Leland Orser, who I have always associated with that crappy copy of"Seven"to protagonizadaba Christopher Lambert called"Resurreción".""There are a lot of good Germans" (one of the first sentences of the film), which seems to be the initial premise that Soderbergh part for haunting us with their images, accompanying them with a classical score reminiscent of what intended, a cut pattern of the cinema of yesteryear.In short, a current tape, passed by the classic tapestry that reconciles the current cinema, with the classic film lovers, an easy way to make a link between both styles.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2736

Ramón Besonias

The invasion

muchocine

It is a pity. Perhaps he hoped that with the reference in the 1956 and the excellent Filmography of Hirschbiegel The invasion was a product higher than the found.

Until the 19th century Western culture attached to the emotions a paper negative and dangerous when setting up the nature of the adult male. And I say man because it was attributed only and exclusively to the male gender the noble endeavour to humanity through their rational capacity towards progress and moral perfection. For its part, the woman was a paradigm of moral weakness and intellectual disabilities; for this reason would be naturally the exclusion of female gender in public life, which was assigned to him - with almost paternal benevolence - the roles of loving mother and caring wife, more tailored to their nature unstable, superficial and unhealthy.A longing of the origins of mankind (Greek culture), and thereby will be already under the ashes of the illustration which will emerge from the hand of the Romantic movement also a reaffirmation of the human passions as necessary substrate for life. It is not the reason which makes better human beings, but natural and noble feelings arising from its interior. It is more, the exaltation of reason, so characteristic of the modern world, so it has only vilify and away to human beings of their nature, altering its ability to act with wisdom and goodness.Oliver Hirschbiegel has never throughout its short filmography so far from this romantic thesis about the causes of human violence. In fact, the excellent experiment and the sinking are perfect examples of the interest of this German from Hamburg to make us reflect on the levers that drive human beings to be caught by the captivating inertia of power. The experiment will be a woman (Maren Eggert) who serve as a counterpoint to the perverse universe recreated in this experimental prison moved under the carcelero-preso binomial (or if the Hegelian slave), and only responsible for return to the character played by the always wonderful Moritz Bleibtreu (elementary particles) to reality. Also in the sinking is a woman who tells? and serves thus awareness - the facts which she herself lived in the bunker of the Führer, hours before ending his life.In The invasion (pending release in Spain back in October) the psychiatrist Carol (his profession makes knowing human emotions) with no little histrionics starring Nicole Kidman will be in charge of struggle to keep your child awake against the male sueño de la Razón. Not in vain the character's relationship with her ex-husband should be as flat before it infected against emotions, thus underlining the rejection of the patriarchal model representing the infected. That is why Carol will only accept doctor Ben (Daniel Craig), which feels something that suppresses even if you want to, if it recognized therein the basic emotions of affection and respect that yearns for after their marriage failure.The sexual roles that Western culture delimitara old with tight determinism reappear in The invasion of form peregrina and superficial, not reaching the intensity and depth that gives us the experiment. Ben is medical, scientific, rational, protective of Carol; Carol, psychiatrist, expert in reading emotions, mother wolf that protects to his offspring. Even the end becomes a postmodern game with this movie buff nod of the final sentence pronounced doctor Ben to read the press. And of course, American science relieves the heavy Viewer unholy suspecting that virus ends up becoming human beings an improved spice dispenser of tobacco. How not, the happy end just by curtailing polyhedral capacity that Yes possessed the proposal of Siegel generate infinite readings. The invasion is light, only shoots with adaptor, without desosegarnos bullets.The socio-political metaphor for its mythical history and reference, Invasion of the Body Snatchers (Don Diegel, 1956), which is applicable with decency even to the remake made by Kaufman in 1978, opts since the beginning to not contribute more than a stifling story (not to be confused with disturbing) of the desperation of a mother to find his son, worthy of a telefilm of three and a half (as the series Rex)(, a different police officer who ran Hirschbiegel in Germany when it was not yet known internationally). Not even found in The invasion an anthropological reading aiming as high as did the previous work of Hirschbiegel. And if what you want is one of fear, without intellectual pretensions and double readings, nor The invasion brings much to the panorama of films scares and persecution. Its potential, focused on the family tragedy of the loss of the child at the hands of an inadvisable husband, is bland and without grip, while the action scenes try to conceal defects of Fund. Recall that a similar story in the hands of Kubrick (the shining) provided us a visually powerful and disturbing work.It is a pity. Perhaps he hoped that with the reference in the 1956 and the excellent Filmography of Hirschbiegel The invasion was a product higher than the found. Hopefully at least one decent fundraising help its director to find new and more evocative stories to tell us. Hopefully.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3765

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

À lintérieur

muchocine

A good horror film bloody pure and simple, with a Béatrice Dalle really unbalanced and relentless as the bad very bad and undoubted dyes of cult film that is well worth highlighting.

Much excitement for this bloody French thriller that already garnered critical acclaim at the Cannes Film Festival past. What begins as a thriller uncovers the half an hour as a brutal orgy gore who plays to beat records in deadly stunts, double jump with ringlet and triple amputation with spillage of gut. The plot of the thriller is quite silly and predictable, but one realizes immediately that the intention of the film actually goes another thing and not care too much. No matter because bloody scenes are fantastically executed and go in a rhythm and a realistic increscendo in c major truly terrifying and because they are also shot with an admirable talent. The makeup effects are great and insistent music manages to freeze us blood. The picture is quite interesting but strikes a unforgivable detail: the use of artificial smoke to create atmosphere in the House is horribly managed and rather gives the impression that will appear behind the curtain of a moment to another the grandfather of the protagonist fumandose pure. The truth is that there seems to be a fire in the House during much of the footage without it and this if that is to shoot the director of photography without any mercy and to include it in the footage. Even though this problem and that the carousel of sadistic exaggerations of the end will fully mother's, the film leaves be taken somewhat seriously if it and thanks to this the film leaves to fully enjoy as entertainment of terror, albeit sometimes with hands covering us a little eyes by the sickly and brutal scenes or covering us the mouth by nervous laughter.In short, a good horror film bloody pure and hard, with a Béatrice Dalle really unbalanced and relentless embodying the bad very bad and undoubted-tinged cult film that is well worth highlighting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/737

José A. Peig

Scoop

muchocine

The friend Woody returns to accommodate composing one minor works, without more ambition than the personal entertainment and of delight their fans with a bunch of tics and hoses the House brand.

After the notable "Match Point," the friend Woody again (as in other occasions) to accommodate composing one minor works, without more ambition than the (bravo he recorded) personal entertainment and of delight their fans with a bunch of "tics" and "hose" the House brand, cemented in a story not devoid of the usual turn ironic and burlesque, which works with modesty, especially thanks to the ease gained during decades of film and almost always moving in a same area. This is for the benefit of the accommodative side bet of a cult author, but rocket positions against innovative betting as his previous work, confirming the stagnation of a filmmaker who will always be welcome to billboards and watched with pleasure by a server, but their recent stories would pass unnoticed if your name and surname does not appear under the "written and directed by".Set tics and phases you are configuring the story hides the usual philosophical ínfula disertada through a small group of characters, to see which of all is relamido and tasteless: student pavita seeking a getaway to his journalistic and research ambition, the amiga confidante who always supports him, the shy son of Dad that hides a secret, the funny character out of a theatre of magic and a plot sustained in the typical serial killer that "nobody knows who is but we all know who will (or won't) be ultimately". I.e., a set of characters without any notion of originality and freshness is added a very predictable plot scheme (and brought too schematic).It is not a bad film, Allen has great moments in some witty dialogues (could not be less) and at some point in the story that manages to coagulate altogether, but there are very specific things. Very little happens in most of the footage and jokes are not of a sarcastic and ironic intelligence surprised. It is the style and charisma of Woody Allen saving function, the text and representation, by themselves, are too insubstantial. And that, obviously, is very little.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1828

Rafa Ferrer

Admitido

muchocine

Typical film jam, starring an actor it jam.

The typical film jam, starring an actor Jam (with see the face to Justin Long one is well aware that it is a jerk fledged), and with an argument as jam possible.Above produces Tom Shyadac, usual in Jim Carrey filmography (comedies), and responsible for Ace ventura and other comics.The argument is laughable, since I do not understand this custom USA of being "cool" or "popular" or go to College, server here wasn't to the Faculty (or enrolled go) and do not think that my life is better or worse for it.A movie for geeks, where the more morons of the panorama walk through it making the bobo, and where, for all the female bait that appears, no a single breast or provocative situation (oops, that until missed it).And above with a finale of trials of those who like both in the USA where calls to the happy ending.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/296

Tito Chinchan

Tiempo de Valientes

muchocine

Action comedy without great special effects, but with a dash of high quality that reminds us that not everything is based on the money

My friend the Toxic Avenger recommends is film in his blog, and since is that he likes to taste subtle frames before clotted films, we said see. These Argentine comedies also tend to like us, not be if by what they say, or as say you. But the fact is that we usually stalks us with them. So what, with these magnificent premises not could only give her a chance.The film is an Argentine psychologist (who would say Sabina) who is sentenced by the judge (also Argentine, is an Argentine film) to do social work for the community by a traffic accident he suffered. So, it is a federal policeman who is depressed by his wife he deceives another to attend. So it is a very odd couple that has to solve a case of enforced disappearance of two types is complicated to lay bare the shames of the Argentine courts.That good panzá to laugh we got between chest and back with this production. For starters, I love the strength of the script, given that without large hisses gets you very quickly in the film, you wrapped subtly and finish very stuck in it. Things that happen have their speck of credibility and, although quite sad and hard (harsh reality) are with this much-needed funny dot. Change of roles faced the two protagonists, that trasmután is also very interesting their identities. And the final outcome, with that little bit of nonsense and the inability that has, I also liked. It is not very credible, but it not inferior to the rest of the film. Notably, the scene is that they smoke marijuana in the car, which is totally subrealista, and the dinner at home of the psychologist. Very large both.In short, comedy action without great special effects, but with a dash of high quality that reminds us that not everything is based on money and you can make magnificent films with not too much.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1073

Silvia

El intruso

muchocine

Psychological thriller that tells the story of how a simple life, quiet and happy, skewed after an incident.

The intruder (Enduring Love) is the latest film by Roger Mitchell, an adaptation of the best-selling "Enduring love" from Ian McEwan, who has become a British thriller paused, but without falling into boredom. Many may be familiar name of the director by the famous "Notting Hill" and that is why many may back down to go see this movie thinking that you it's a new romantic comedy. Nothing further from the truth. It is a psychological thriller that tells the story of how a simple, quiet and happy, life is impaired following an incident and the obsessive insistence of a character played brilliantly by Rhys Ifans (known for his role of roommate of Hugh Grant in Notting Hill) the story begins in a manner more innocent. Joe (a superb Daniel Craig, the new James Bond) has something to tell Claire (Samantha Morton), his partner. So it has chosen a beautiful sunny day picnic in the field. But apparently harmless balloon will leave a terrible impression on the memory of both, but it will be more intense in the Joe. That day apparently unimportant will mark the existence of all the characters in the film.From that day, Joe can not think that he could have prevented what happened on day of the incident with the globe, so that feeling of guilt ends up becoming an obsession. One day he receives a call from Jed Parry (Rhys Ifans), one of the people who were there that day, expressing their need to see him. Jed insists that they have shared a transcendental moment and therefore something unites them since the day of the incident with the balloon. The film is the impact of the casual events of our lives and the way in which these strange events can hopelessly desquebrajar lives. As reflected a critic of the Chicago Sun-Times about the film, the way to raise the conflict is interesting: "most of the films focus on what is happening." "Few films are called into question what is happening, and let alone deal with the fact that we can decide, most of the times, about what is happening and what to do about".The film benefits from a script in which the important things are not the facts that are happening but fears, obsessions and desires of the protagonists. This is a great challenge cinematically speaking, that the feelings seem easier to explain with words (as in the novels) that only with images. Although the best and the worst (because it may be repetitive) is the continuous reflection raised characters on the single fact (but essential) that leads the narration. A fact that each of them arises and interprets differently. But a masterful home (with the bright scene of the globe) able to engage the viewer in the story after few seconds followed by a development which at times can seem slow. While it is true that the film boasts quite a few scenes suggestive and intriguing thanks to which is is holding narration. Example of this is the scene of the birthday where about the words to know the innermost thoughts of each.Finally, the story wondered if love really exists, if it is forever. The character of Joe has a nihilist's life and love vision as he believes that love is an illusion and life makes no sense (apart from the biological) Although we endeavor to give it. In the film refers to different types of love but in the end it reaches the same conclusion: love exists by itself and must not find any rational explanation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/347

Jesus Lens

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

Not you will be given a prize important and surely, it won't be to the anthologies of the history of the cinema, but the five euros invested in box office are well, but very well spent.

A film that in your footage boats, sea, adventure, pirates and the famous "Ron, ron, ron the bottle of rum", also includes a fifteen men on the chest of the dead always count, of course, my most sincere and enthusiastic sympathy. I.e., to enter to see the new adventures of Captain Sparrow and his boys, Sacai and I were cheerful and optimistic and funny.Prior to this type of film paraphernalia advised to equip, as do the kids of popcorn, potatoes and sodas, that not every day is an opportunity to rejuvenate for two hours and a half, such and as long as that takes footage from a film genre which, however, breaks with many of the typical topics of the adventure film.The characters, for example. Everything is spoof in these pirates of the Caribbean. Each imposing pose one of the protagonists is immediately followed by a little humiliation to his ego: a coup, a fall, a whack. Sword fights are anything less heroic, leakage are rocambolescas and, at times, it gives the feeling that the Marx Brothers are going to leave one of the cabins of the Black Pearl. And what are these "Pirates of the Caribbean II", which are a cartoon with his pace, his gestural comical, their persecution, their gags and its rigging. It's like a cartoon film. but big. To the beast. Because producers have not repaired in expenditure to achieve a lavish decorations, a perfect ambiance and, above all, some spectacular special effects. Thus, the emergence of the Dutch Errante and, above all, of the Kraken and its sinister tentacles are absolutely spectacular.I admit that the first part taking quite forgotten, had moments in which I lost arguably, without knowing who was who and why, suddenly, had laughter celebrating jokes for beginners. And is that this franchise of Sparrow has rendered fans who have seen the first part more than three to four times, fans that will return to the cinema in the coming days to delight with the waste of this second part imagination and that, when appeared The end screen, began to (des) count the days that they are still missing for the premiere of the third film in the seriesalready filmed and announced in the spring of next year.This is a film with no claim of significance, however, is refreshing and stimulating, flexible and fun. One of these films of summer you reconcile with the sea, the wind, adventures and memories of childhood; It is with joy, enjoy with pleasure and makes you have a delicious time."Pirates of the Caribbean II" will not give any prize important and surely, it won't be to the anthologies of the history of the cinema. Surely, it amasará a fortune at the box office and, perhaps, it will make any kid to discover to Robert Louis Stevenson, but in any case, the five euros invested in box office are well, but very well spent.PD.-agree not fail to look at this unique witch lover of Voodoo. A wonderful secondary character who, hopefully, in the third to give more prominence. He deserves it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/214

Daniel Galindo

Camino a Guantánamo

muchocine

Audiovisual hybrid with Iran as the chosen scenario to recreate Afghanistan within a so atrocious as inescapable fable

Winterbottom returns to demonstrate his mastery of cinematic technique, something which has been evident in that his filmography has been catching packaging.Without a script written as such and with a few characters? true? they roam through a ficcionada reality, road to Guantanamo is of these films which stage a hard blow to the Viewer by its ideological and emotional burden. Film necessary, Yes, but also cinema dared not only by what it has, but by the way does it.The director of titles such as Wonderland, Welcome to Sarajevo and code 46 we have come precisely to that we get not used in their own way kind of filmmaking, disparate projects and others, but with the same rigour as its aesthetic and formal precision. Its last release again an audiovisual hybrid with Iran as the chosen scenario to recreate Afghanistan in a fable as atrocious as inescapable.Strongly resembles this variant of the way the hell in this world (In this World), the film in which the British filmmaker was the adventures of two young Afghans from Pakistan, starting a journey of no return by the silk route to London which holds a promised Eden on a future better. Path? approaching to the documentary genre, but it is not like other more journalistic products that it is intended to highlight the component of entertainment that has all fiction. Do do the drama of? the Tipton three?, three British Muslims confused with terrorists and shipped in the worst trip of their lives, stars this essential story to position ourselves, with solid arguments, terror policy imposed by Governments before the imperialist desire, camouflaged as a survival instinct before the American colossus, from countries such as Iran and United States.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/69

Lara Croft

Virgen a los 40 años

muchocine

The worst movie I saw in a long time

Night of those without desire anything, some moodiness and the never well weighted "hate to all human beings who inhabit this planet". What better see a comedy to get the clouds of the head and clear a while?. Good proposal, pity I keep asking me.I tend to watch bad movies are knowingly. Usually I find that funny, but there's always an exception to the rule. To corroborate the magnitude of my limitation (I can never leave a film by half) I saw complete the two hours and ten minutes of this absolutely painful "comedy". I leave record that I got the parody of Hair and "Aquarius". I want my 130 minutes back.Virgin to age 40 is the worst movie I saw in a long time (much).PS: Catherine Keener you still love.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1291

Tito Chinchan

Torrente 2: Misión en Marbella

muchocine

Essential film for any lover of cinema entertainment. Patriotic humor that exudes irony and dubious taste through all the pores, but that shows that the public is sufficiently intelligent to discern between fiction and reality. As well as emphasize the ditch that separates the viewer of the critic.

A few years ago they premiered this film, and remains the second highest grossing of the Spanish film. Despite this, critique the has despellajado up nausea the tape, as in everything. This makes me think that you maybe that viewers have a few tastes very different from those who must advise us to do and what not to see. It may that the viewer demand more torrents and less Garcis be? It may be that the Viewer is sufficiently intelligent to choose what really is good? Not, I worry if when it comes to criticism against the third most viewed movie in the film Spanish. To this, certainly does not affect the crisis, nor the foreign film or anything of the sort, is sold without problem.The film is about torrent, a záfio, meanest, disgusting and all the adjectives qualifiers negative potential, who lives in Marbella spending millions and millions (acquired in the first film). As melts all the capital, it has to go back to work, so it became embroiled in a conspiracy of a mad Tycoon that seeks to destroy Marbella if you don't receive a few milloncejos. You can stream and his inseparable Cuco terminating Jose Luis Moreno and his monkey? Make your bets, gentlemen.Torrent 2 was, for me, a radical change in the landscape of the Spanish film. Paid for to begin with, itself, which is already of merit. He then approached us the typical North American cinema media waste, but with characters from here, those who make grace to the public. And he taught us that second parts may be better than the first. Once Santiago Segura was spared having to show us the virtues of Torrente, weapon a kind of thread (I dare not call it script) that serves to draw thousands of hilarious moments, with characters from all the coats that fold to your wishes. Performances by Jose Luis Moreno, bad bondiano total, or Gabino Diego, who has become the paradigm of sympathetic Spanish film junkie, or Tony Leblanc, as kind of Patriarch come, preached a tape sold alone. You don't need anyone her have and that anyone sell you (and see Santiago Segura insisted to do so). A tape of the taste of the Spanish public, that hardly can be exported.In short, essential film for any lover of cinema entertainment. Patriotic humor that exudes irony and dubious taste through all the pores, but that shows that the public is sufficiently intelligent to discern between fiction and reality. As well as emphasize the ditch that separates the viewer of the critic.Genial.Besitos.P.D: I got the criticism made without referring just to the first, I believe that it marks a milestone in the Spanish film criticism, ja, ja, ja.Moments to remember: ** the presentation style James Bond with torrent hanging from a nipple. ** the first scene with cuckoo at the wheel of the coche.* "who has thrown a black pool?" says when they are bathing. ** once Cuco wakes up at the bar and asks a zumito while lifting the hand saw him being punctured the kick on the arm that while he says "Put me a zumito"", it has many vitamins". "With the hand or with the mouth?" responds cuckoo. "With your mouth?" but you're a degenerate. Ummm. "well, we will see how it is that" says torrent is unzip the bragueta.* to the end, when stream has to throw the missile into the sea and said "to the sea?" no kid, to Gibraltar! Spanish or anyone! "."** "You know that women have 5 dolls?" "The barby (touching the Chin), wrists, barriguitas (tocandole the belly) and the chochona!"** "I gave that el Fary is God!" say that your mother is a whore. "well, that not tell, that everybody already knows".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/973

Ricard Marcet

Lilith

muchocine

The profound legacy of a filmmaker unparalleled

Two years before his early death from diabetes, Robert Rossen signed what would be her last film: Lilith. Four decades after its premiere, its dramatic complexity and his lyricism reach us intact, with the same capacity to challenge the Viewer.Vincent Bruce (Warren Beatty), a young veteran, returned to Maryland, his hometown, with the intention of working in Poplar Lodge, a nearby psychiatric centre. His predisposition to help will be responsible for the Centre do not hesitate to accept him among its workforce. It will soon set in Lilith, a beautiful and intelligent sick he has built to its around an imaginary world, with a language and a logic of their own.Since the beginning, thanks to the Mise en scène by Rossen, the viewer also feels curiosity by Lilith: first without seeing his appearance, it will show to the internal from the window to monitor the movements of Vincent, and will not be until a few minutes later, after hearing much about it and have fuelled our desire to see her, which, in the first Exchange of words with VincentRobert Rossen gives us a closed level of his angelic face. Through its beauty and a special sensitivity which takes you to contemplate, without rest, the flashes of light in the flow of the River, Lilith will become before our eyes and Vincent, a kind of nymph or also living in harmony with nature. It won't be until that she spit from the bridge, causing the laughter of the companions of the Centre, which we will draw from our reverie and will return to reality. However, Vincent will be captivated by Lilith and apañará them, convincing policy-makers of the psychiatric hospital, to pass the as long as possible with her. At his side, he will forget the ghosts that you torture, such as the death of his mother and memories of war, and contagiará his Joie de vivre. Thus, despite having rejected it once by his caregiver status, its principles will go overlooked and will be delivered to the enjoyment that proposes Lilith: after being crowned as medieval kings, in a scene that symbolizes the final approach to the world of the beautiful sick, consumará the desire of both. Framing in nature and relating it to the flashes of light in the water, the sex to be the couple will be shown by the director as something sublime, both fleeting and eternal.However, Vincent, defined by the own Lilith as a "worshiper of pain", not settle for love which offers the young and enfurecerá to discover that he has sexual intercourse with Mrs.Yvonne (Anne Meacham), another internal. Unable to accept the fact of not owning Lilith exclusively, it enloquecerá by jealousy. Its most destructive instinct it ending with what both longs for owning. After the terrible outcome, you can just return to the psychiatric hospital as one patient.With this hopeless end, Robert Rossen will close his filmography. The director, who was vapuleado by the power of their own country before the Communist alarm, defines the moral imperative, expression of the desire of power, such as cancer of humanity. Rossen, it is the man himself in its desire to possess (in this case, possess himself) that is overriding a fierce moral that governed his life. Judging from the story of Vincent, as well as her married friend (less developed but not insignificant), that morality which aims to define the limits of good and evil, able to delimit the madness, punificar sex or send one to war, just causes frustration men and carries it of remorse. To all this, the American filmmaker puts Lilith, possessed of a moral permeable and characterized by its natural goodness. With a mise en scène that deals with kindness the personal world of the young sick (the details of the flashes of light, as well as the travelling that follows the reflection of the couple in the water, betray the will of the filmmaker to be close to it) will be through his martyrdom in the hands of Vincent Robert Rossen will reach the viewer its profound legacy: as says Mrs.Yvonne at a time of great lucidity "principles should be examined constantly".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3375

Andrés Pons

Next Door

muchocine

Sadomasochism is shown in full boiling in a wild script that encourages the blood from the first moment.

About a decade ago the Norwegian director unknown PAL SLETAUNE premiered with huge impact including a nomination for the Academy Award as best foreign language film "The postman in love" A sort between comedy and Thriller made with great freshness in a tour of dry violence surprised to be an unusual film.The Norwegian film is obviously not too popular, virtually is complicated high that something done around here comes to Spain. It is therefore normal that he lost track of this interesting author.Look out where two years later comes in 2007 another title of the author in is occasion could be categorized as a horror film, or at least reach unattainable terrifying limits in genuine proposals of the genre.An enclosed space that encourages the craustofobia characters on the edge of madness played masterfully by young performers who made their debut in the film although they have a comprehensive curriculum on television. Sadomasochism is shown in full boiling in a wild script that encourages the blood from the first moment.A paragon of virtues in the dark photography, a music that helps in this Web of great darkness that surrounds a Halo sick of Frank decadence into something that can only end in tragedy.Sex is totally destructive in the big premiere of the season which unfortunately happens to the cruel anonymity.The Norwegian film walks of congratulations after the also brilliant Thriller URO's next release.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2860

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Seduciendo a un extraño

muchocine

Cinema bizarre exercise to the Hitchcock that ends up being a circus spectacle of boring acrobats who end up despanzurrando on the floor. And I am...

The viewer little picky are you anesthesia the sudden interest in good cinema with products of this species: invoiced films under the always helpings resource go being misled, adding false leads that tripping over themselves viewing to a tour de force pathetic with the inevitable slogan of "Let's see who is capable of filming an engañabobos with finest ingredients". Because seducing a stranger is an elegant scam, not dumbs the casual viewer, but that outraged to who still takes pleasure in the misty atmosphere of the classics of the genre, worthy and imperishable, written with respect for the intelligence of who sacrifices a couple of hours of your time to lose in a deranged carousel of computer goodies, forensic camelos and rattling sounds end to disarm the weak will that something of what we have just suffer canover time, bring us some beautiful memories. Anyway, all this film seeks and makes life bonancible and jubilant. We agree that tens (read if you want to hundreds) worst films, but the mimbres of this, its cast - as I said before - and dreadful machinery of marketing that sprayed it the world deserved a level certainly higher. We are asking for mediocrity and find mediocrity. Or perhaps comes to happen to see that James Foley directs the play, we believe that we have the right to find something of what we saw, and we enjoyed enormously, in his film Glengarry Glenn Ross, master piece of recent American cinema in view of this (now) stunning chronicler.The popularity of its actors (Berry, Willis) does not guarantee anything: in any case it aggravates. I'm going to write it well clear: a terrible film. Luckily that I rented it in a video store.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1863

Iñaki Bilbao

El increíble hombre menguante (The incredible shrinking man)

muchocine

It has entered own right in the history of cinema for his wise presentation of everyday horror in a person's life for the simple fact of being diminished its size in relation to the objects that surround us every day. A classic of science fiction.

"As a result of being exposed to radioactive clouds, a man begins to see its size diminished progressively." "Thereby, its relationship with the world change significantly, starting with his girlfriend and later with simple household objects and the cat from his home".One of the mythical titles of film science fiction of all time, discovered on television by Chicho Ibáñez Serrador, a lover of such films. It has entered its own right in the history of cinema for his wise presentation of everyday horror in the life of a person by the simple fact of being diminished its size in relation to the objects on a daily basis around us, as the phone, a doll's House, and with animals, such as a cat happens to be a pet to querere eat. Excellent special effects in charge of Richard Matheson, author of the novel.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/293

Bloody Will

Superman returns

muchocine

I'll stick with that sweet taste of seeing again to Superman, and that bitter too deepen in the characters and their relationships

If this altitude, if it is not. If too much romance, if not. If the approach of Synger is wrong if you have made the best film of the year superhero? have been several weeks discussing what Brian Synger has devised for the return, highly anticipated, of the last citizen of Krypton, and we are 60% of excited, and 40% of not so much.With this I want to say that nobody, absolutely nobody has been to give birth the film, nor even I. The only thing that has been done is reel off piece to piece a film, which created expectation, could not claim otherwise. Same thing has happened with "X-Men 3", or "Cars" and will happen to "Pirates of the 2 Caribbean": are the perfect vehicle for the corners to what is sold as a round film.Sitting this Declaration of intent, say, to begin with, that I thank eternally Synger for having given to Superman a fund that previously did not. A fund human, vulnerable and with concerns that go beyond bad search and arrest them. My adult side is satisfied. The child something confused.Nobody said that Synger copied a Superman comic book and give us punches without ton nor. As it did in the two incursions into the world of the X-Men, gives more importance to the emotions of the protagonists, avoiding that the action sequences are the only thing that will fill the screen during the footage. Visually it has no comparison with the latest incursions of superheroes on the screen. Technology at the service of the character.In "Superman Returns" there is action, not all the desirable, but there are many. The plane scene is something demanded for years. Thus, when you finish seeing her, you have left the impression that you've not only seen a film of special effects, but you've attended the presentation of a new Superman, different from the 1980s, and that will be for the next few years.What I like: Brandon Routh did a great job. The greatest success of Synger has been hiring a real stranger who, in a minute, and you identify with the man of steel. When deciding to put poker face, so borda (the scene where spy from afar the home of Lois), and in the latter part of the film, the most dramatic, makes you really believe that "Superman" is vulnerable, something that seems to be the goal of the director.I don't know that it would have been the film without Kate Bosworth. I now understand because they have chosen her as the best Lois. It is without doubt the reincarnation of the Lois of the comics, a strong, independent woman, in love with until the bars of the hero. Of Kevin Spacey I can only say that it is the best actor of villain in recent years. Otherwise could not be who give life to Lex Luthor.Y now, not so good.There is no round movies and special effects cannot save everything. Perhaps the longing to see again in the film Superman causes that history does not have the speed that you want.I do not like the absolute silence on why Superman has been missing all these years. I know that Synger saves it for the sequel, I hope so, but had not been badly some flashback, or at least a preview. If by the production company it was sold as a continuation of "Superman II", was seen not as Superman therefore was not is why again.I don't like the plan of Luthor. A continent made of rock?, and obliterate the U.S. for what?. Luthor has always been well in conjunction with some supervillain to put the force, and in the absence of this, must be depriving Superman of his powers for Lex him from a beating. We saw in "Superman", but with less cruelty. Do do general Zod will be the villain of the sequel?, more'd better you to Synger.Por please, I hope answers in the sequel on the "surprise ending", already you know? if above I do not hear of where he's been, nor tell me when? this.Now you turn you comment on the film. I am left with that sweet of seeing Superman again? and this bitter taste that made the mistake of "Hulk", deepen too in the characters and relationships you distracts from what really pretendías to see.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1029

Rafa Ferrer

Diamante de sangre

muchocine

Another way to see the conflict of diamonds and take care of what happens until that blessed white stone appears in our hands.

Conflict diamonds in Africa would give for several films, books, magazines and other pamphlets, a nearly negligible piedrecita generates hatreds, jealousies, and a large trail of blood (as the title suggests), would seriously consider that "A diamond is forever" and one with a heart overwhelmed by history, tries to demistify that myth, families have just been shattered (talk about the tape)guerrillas make your August liquidating right and left to the staff, and 4 exploited in turn, try to fill their pockets. Di Caprio, (lately I am catching the aftertaste to see him on screen), Jennifer Connelly and Djimon Hounsou, who I had the pleasure of discovering "In America", (even without makeup just looks excellent on screen), they form the distribution of the tape, to Di Caprio, him we see online, more than correct, Djimon Hounsou excellent, knowing to bring his character all the drama that deserves, as well as Jennifer Connelly brilliant in his appearances. The film maintains its pace from beginning to end, and at any time cease to things happen, the problem may be that open as many frames at the same time, it is difficult to close them one to one of the pull, to highlight undoubtedly sensational special effects (those explosions and flashes) and a strong and well-constructed, script although I sayso independent plot makes the film at times a tad bland. Finally, another way to see the conflict of diamonds and take care of what happens until that blessed white stone appears in our hands.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/321

Silvia

En la tiniebla

muchocine

The overall impression that leaves the movie is like a coffee decaffeinated, not very satisfactory, but not entirely unpleasant.

The darkness is, despite what the title might suggest, a thriller tinged dramatic (or sensibleros if you want to) film, a tale of ghosts with a dramatic tone, rather than a horror film. The new film by Craig Rosenberg brings us again, after some time without appearing on screen, Demi Moore, who was in a not too distant past, one of the highest paid actresses of the film industry.The successful life of the character of Demmi Moore writer is truncated after the death of his son. From the rugged death of the child - which the mother feels deeply guilty - the marriage of Rachel is broken and his creativity as a writer disappears, so it is forced to move to a solo spot to try to regain his inspiration and his emotional stability. The writer is going to live in a lonely House in the farther from Wales, in the island of Ynys Landwynn tip. A place of wild beauty, with long beaches and a lighthouse that is particularly important. There Rachel begins to experience chilling visions of his son, and begins a romance with its nearest neighbour, Angus McCulloch (Jamie Edgell), a lighthouse keeper who lives on a small island in front of the House. The visions appear more frequently and there are all kinds of events that no one else can see (apart from the Madwoman of the people).The argument is fraught with topics as the the man/woman/family that moved to an abandoned house and begins to perceive signals of ghosts. The film is unoriginal, but manages to stay in tension with some scares. Constant plot turns that manage to disassemble the hypotheses or theories that can make the viewer with regard to the course of events occur along the script. Especially, to half of the tape, the argument changes radically in a way that can be considered something forced but also him away a little of the typical outcomes of this genre of movies. Thus the overall impression that leaves the movie is like a coffee decaffeinated, not very satisfactory, but not entirely unpleasant.Recommended for those who would like to receive signals from the more beyond. And is that you as says in one scene the lover of the writer: "Can that the dead lend more than less than us to them".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/561

Jose Contreras

El diablo viste de Prada

muchocine

How it moves from a woman of flesh and blood to be a maniac of the catwalks, trademarks and the size 34?

The Chinese mandarins had the habit of reducing their girls toes after carefully breaking the bones, burning women have a few rings that are added to the neck until the cervical are separated completely. The Westerners have size 34. Beauty, it seems, has to be accompanied by some kind of torture.There is no denying that fashion has its appeal, but I think that fashion that is there to attract the opposite sex does not require such waivers. "The Devil Wears Prada" talk of the obsession by fashion and the thinness to be at the height of a head and a cosmetic Empire, as it is that of the fashion magazines. "Women of the film have been disconnected in order to first fashion, taste, and have entered the maniaco-compulsiva spiral of unpronounceable names and gateways.""The Devil Wears Prada" is the story of a simple and careless girl who enters, to its regret, in the scene and discovers that he has to choose between this and his private life. Discourse zarandea the custom predatory, common in enterprises, stepping on to the of to the side for climbing positions. I would have preferred that it despellejara that another custom, the film provided with indifference, confused with domestic service employees. The protagonist does not complain of having to seek a publishing innovation before it comes on the market for the daughters of the great head! not having to do the work of cole!In fact such insurmountable evidence are the key that explains the abduction of Anne Hathaway. How it moves from a woman of flesh and blood to be a maniac of the catwalks, trademarks and the size 34? As you go from interesting to level enefalograma? Made it with evidence. Just that something cost that we forget ourselves. Once abducted gives equal to talk of a carving, a small walk, a long neck, earn more than the neighbor, win a tournament.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2011

Tyler

Spiderman 3

muchocine

It is the worst of the trilogy which takes this into cuadrilogía. Do do the box office responds, and someone much smarter than I once said that? never argue you to a success?.

Now yes, now I can speak. I've already seen and, as I expected, it is the worst of the trilogy which takes this into cuadrilogía. ERGO, there will be a fourth movie which recur Sony Pictures which is not known to that level of participation will be Raimi, Maguire and Dunst, but I think that Raimi considered this character already yours to and safe returns to the battle, if not as director as producer, but now refers to a screenplay by David Koepp, which suggests that the fourth part of the adventures of "Spiderman" repeated with regard to its team.Not be what would think in the event of a change to this level, would it collapse?, it is risky to say because, dammit, James Bond have done you pretty well their changes throughout the series. What happens is that Spider-man makes a mistake in this sense. James Bond the things have done you well by, among other reasons, its mode of script, i.e. all the stories which told us about Bond are absolutely independent, is a series, and as saga his movies work alone. I do not need me to see before "Only for your eyes" that "The man of the Golden gun" to understand the story. The Spider-Man movies have a fairly risky continuity in that regard. "Spiderman 3" make another big mistake, his excesivisimo footage, on the other hand inevitable that the error comes from further back, and the duration is an error that occurs by carambola of another, that is resent to the entire film and damage its structure at all levels.Raimi knew from the outset that this part Spider-man was going to face the Sandman; also knew that, necessarily, Harry Osborn should continue in the saga and avenge his father, now as a modernized ultra Green Goblin. Avi Arad, responsible for production of all films and coordinator of the Marvel company for all its film adaptations, then told Raimi who should introduce once venom, one of the characters with more popular heat by comics fans. Raimi became convinced only when Arad said that people should see once the dark side of Spiderman and Peter Parker. This convinced Raimi who, with his brother, turned to writing. Venom is a character that does not have the sympathy of Raimi, and it shows a lot. Well, what I wanted to get I is here, if you have cash well Venom makes Spider-man already three enemies in this part. Three enemies! "Any writer with two fingers of lights I'd say that is crazy, because there is no way to structure it well, to give coherence to the skeleton of the story."Spider-Man 3 "has no pace, is going to catch-up and, occasionally, because you don't have to go changing the plot remains stagnant. For this reason Raimi needed more time to close all these frames, something that does not do well.A film can not have more than one plot may have few sub-plots want, but never more than one plot main, and "Spiderman 3" has three because even having been able to turn his confrontation with Harry Osborn into something less important, Raimi and his brother give it too much weight. At a technical level "Spiderman 3" is more an episode of a sitcom than a film. The sit? coms work like that, with more than one plot, but the film is much more closed, you have to take many things into account and not do what comes out of noses, for this reason the films of directors like Lars Von Trier or Julio Medem will never be good movies, because passed the rules of screenplay for the eggs, and this affects their films, making them true tostones.If Raimi would have done what initially wanted, i.e. confronting Spider-man with the man of sand and had become the Green Goblin subplot the movie had worked much better, its structure not be resentiria and his pace would be much more kinetic.The box office responds, and someone much smarter than I (which is not particularly difficult) once said "never will you argue to success". It is true, and in this sense "Spiderman 3" is opinion, something that we all expected. But one well, think it was as this was film, also her we would have gone to see all. The Spider-man franchise works only by his name, and that if there is than giving it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4107

Jesus David

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

A good film, that keeps you connected to it from beginning to end, with great actors and a great handling of the camera by the director, I was surprised in that aspect. And already, more only would it destripara you the film.

Álex de la Iglesia, one of our best directors, is back to give a class and not of mathematics, if not on how to make good cinema and, above all, what comes of the balls. Much I have read about that isn't his style, or that it has lost its label, it seems as if a director had the obligation to follow exclusively in a single style and thus fall into the routine. But Alex is clever enough to offer us in each of his films a different point of view that sometimes it succeeds and sometimes not. A great success, for starters, is to include two of the greats such as Elijah Wood and John Hurt. And another great success is certainly include other large two breasts of Eleanor, lest be we forgot that we we have a Spanish film.History will speak little that in the end I just putting the leg and I tell you something that I should not. Martin (Elijah Wood), an American student, arrives at Oxford with the intention that Arthur Seldom (John Hurt), a famous Professor of logic, directed his doctoral thesis. The two will be involved in a series of crimes that have to be solved through logic, philosophy and own mathematics.We have a good film of intrigue, with small ups and downs, but that keeps you hooked to the Viewer from beginning to end. And it is not for less, because the beginning is commendable, and is where the master which has church with an incredible level camera sequence that unveils the first crime. After this, well it is true that there is much dialogue and can be quite tiresome, although the protagonists thrive well in their roles. In reality it is like watching an episode of House, you do not know that Devils are saying when they try to know which disease is the patient, but keep you hooked.But if the Viewer is slept, Alex, once again, he has been ready and said: there seems to be much dialogue here. as put here tits and an ass there and ready. And responsible for providing us with such images is none other than Leonor Watling. I had not seen the eyes of Elijah Wood as open as it was in possession of the ring. With regard to the role of Eleanor (Lorna) little cabe highlight apart from these scenes. Not because to do so bad, quite the contrary, but because just it appears throughout the film, except for those blessed scenes.I can not forget the soundtrack carried out by Roque Baños, which is exceptional, with all the words. A real luxury. Anyway, in short, for those who do not want to read all the rollaco to loose: A good film, that keeps you connected to it from beginning to end, with great actors and a great handling of the camera by the director, surprised me in that regard. And already, say something more only would it destripara you the film. Last thing I will say is that as soon as he finished the film came me a desire to mad to eat spaghetti.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1538

Dragon negro

El grito 2

muchocine

Sequel to the remake of the Japanese film the curse and a clear example of how to do a bad sequel without imagination and repeating the same pattern over and over again.

After the events in the first part, this new movie will show us three lines argue them one of them has to do with our protagonist, Sarah Michelle Gellar as his sister will come to fetch her to take her home, but will be stuck in the same problem her to investigate what happened to him and enter the cursed House. On the other hand we have a couple of girls young students who decide to spend a joke to another third making entering the House and make a macabre game, as it will end up not being more real than they anticipate. And finally the third storyline where we have an American family whose members begin to behave in a strange and aggressive.The film is nothing more than a succession of scenes of scares and deaths, over and over again we see some of the protagonist being harassed by the pale ghost of the child, the mother or both at the same time until that just dying. There are some successful scare, it must be said, but it is that as each scene is practically equal to the previous average film already they tired. Although they then attempt to sneak us some plot the sister of previous protagonist and his research to find out that it has happened but is just fanning in five minutes and really nothing fits what tells us. And then it ends with a final which saw the League towards time but that they stop to explain with flashbacks is not that our poor intelligence not captures it.It is high time that the director of the originals and their remakes goodbye of a saga that no longer has much to say and is the only thing that is going to get bored.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/200

Raccord

Encadenados

muchocine

Nazis, intrigue and passion in one of the films that occupies a place in my particular podium from maestro Hitchcock filmography. A delight.

A spy film unconventional, with outstanding performances by Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman. And I am surprised that I like, because I know I'm a declared fan of his style can not find too many similarities to other films of his own. Audiovisual aspect is the same to which we are accustomed always; but in the script it introduces innovations. Here there is a Byzantine plot or farfetched situations; the suspense is created with the minimum number of elements (a key and a bottle) as if he had chosen to do the "harder still" when it comes to get us the heart in a fist. Also introduces very well the loving component in the film, using his enormous creativity: mocking censorship, which prevented then several seconds on screen kisses, makes that Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman talk one to one centimeter of the other and giving peaks constantly. This produces a much more "dirty" effect on screen than a kiss of screw. At the same time, in this torrid scene the protagonists speak completely inconsequential subjects, what makes it stand out more. Hitchcock here proves that apart from the genius of intrigue, it was also an away series in the romantic scenes.The character of "the bad" is portrayed much more psychological depth than thrillers of conspiracies and spies to use. As data fun, "Chained" in reality it is the only film with science fiction overtones in entire Filmography of Hitchcock that he spent something really funny. In the famous talks with Truffaut, the master of Suspense reveals wore seeking money from 1944 to make the film, but no Studio wanted to produce it because contained in his script, an atomic bomb, something that nobody believed that it came to invent. Only a year later the Manhattan project was made public and the Americans unleashed massacres of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Only then the savvy producers, already convinced that it was plausible to manufacture nuclear weapons, decided to finance "Chained".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1174

Oscar Cantero

Atrapa el fuego

muchocine

Bitter story, based on a real event, which makes us understand that silence in the face of injustice can be just as bad as herself.

Based on real events which occurred in 1980, when South Africa desangraba dominated by the white minority and full Apartheid, catches fire tells the story of a white man that the inevitability of fate makes discover that look another way when you have the injustice before you become silent accomplice and potential future victim. It is a concept which defines perfectly the maximum that is popularly attributed to Bertolt Brecht, but belongs to a priest victim of the nazis called Martín Nimoeller, and which reads as follows: "first they came for the Jews, and I said nothing because I was not a Jew." Then they came for the Communists and I said nothing because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I said nothing because I was not a trade unionist. "Then they came for me, but by then, already was nobody saying anything".The film tries to transmit the heart-rending cry of a people that suffered indignity and humiliation during decades of subjugation. And it does so with a bit of demagogic populism, license taken certainly to try to increase tax revenue at the box office. Being a completely lawful measure, it is also true that you subtract something of solemnity to the story, even though the end product is quite interesting and it is not dared predict potential eligibility for the Golden statuette. Very good, as usual, the interpretation of Tim Robbins, one of those billionaires on the left that they photograph with Fidel Castro but they repudiate a handshake of people as Ruiz Gallardón (hand which by the way has not signed any death penalty) and usually work and become involved in projects of this type, combining politics and cinema quality. And on the way, everything is said, pocketing some millions of dollars from your current account.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3257

Adrian Bravo

It's fine! Everything is fine!

muchocine

It is as if a screenwriter with cerebral palsy and David Lynch lobotomizado join forces to make one of the more bizarre, refreshing and absurd films that have seen in my life.

This start. Well the first thing I will say is unclassifiable. But if I strive a little, let's see could say that it is as if a lobotomizado David Lynch and a screenwriter with cerebral palsy (the latter is not no joke, it is reality) join forces to make one of the more bizarre, refreshing and absurd films that have seen in my life. Then say that porn is not projected in commercial theaters. It's fine, everything is fine has porn hardcore, as if it were not enough history to put the cry in the sky to certain sectors of society or to test our idea of where just the imagination and risk and where bad taste (probably most will decline by bad taste). I still do not know, and probably do not know. Perhaps it will take a few years, and after reviewing, you can say something. Which Yes, is that Crispin Glover is not a normal guy. I was fortunate to see the premiere of the film in 35 mm in Sitges, presented by the own Glover, and only with that had given me satisfied. Crispin, dressed in a suit type "I'm elegant with a mafia twist", hair planchadita and atusada which included a sharp face and sweaty fruit of nerves, we began to talk about the film without really saying anything. His model girlfriend, provided him with a smile on the lips. This guy knows something we don't know, and gives me laughs at us. His proposal is totally geek, Geek in uppercase. The movie us into the perverse and overheated mind of a troubled cincuentón of cerebral palsy (the screenwriter for the film, Steven C. Stewart, who died within a month of completing the film, and I can assure that veery happy for having done), makes us dive into his obsession for long-haired women and presents a world in which all when understand you speaks (although you can barely mumble nonsense words) and you they want sexually. Dialogs are, therefore, endless, and never fail to understand what it says, only through the responses of their lovers. Once the above is passed through the stone to all kinds of women (a bitter widow, a daughter of the first lolita, a prostitute ) strangles them with its powerful forearm and back to start. Crispin Glover for his film get a look between eighties and amazing timeless, and the use of colors is formidable. The movie holds final surprise for us and makes us understand what appeared to be a derision to persons with problems of mobility and speech is really a tribute. The director presents a world in which it is not absurd as a stunning woman fervently want almost inanimate body of a patient. Without giving has, the film is set and slowly let the absurd to flood our heads until hardly feel puzzled about the situation. I believe that Crispin Glover is aware of that passes through an inner world is not the most, and this is the ultimate test. Well, actually no, because this film accompanies a prequel (What is it?) and a sequel, still to shoot (It is mine). The trouble with Charlie's Angels and the friend of rats in Willard is in form. It is becoming the film underground cult figure, and he knows. Hopefully you have mecha for awhile. We will enjoy it (we are a minority, clear).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3202

Jose Contreras

El Orfanato

muchocine

The orphanage deserves to become one of those clichés that everyone agrees with only mention the title.

On one occasion, I screened "The sixth sense" in class and a student asked me why the psychologist could see others and them you did not see him. I realized that Shyamalan had shot for "Ghost" after spectators who accepted as natural a world of invisible dead is only seen by mediums as Whoopy Goldberg. So I told him to see "Ghost". There are films that mark a before and an after. And I think "The orphanage" deserves to go on that list. I believe that it deserves to become one of those clichés that everyone agrees with only mention the title. Shyamalan introduced the idea of the complexity in the genre of ghosts. Ghosts are not there only to terrorize us, have a history, want to let us listen, are, in short, one character. What "The orphanage" adds to this imaginary is the world of the ghosts is as a game in which we can only enter as we entered a game, noting the rules with absolute seriousness and olividando the rules of the real world while we are inside. Huizinga observed that the rules of the game, the space, the observation of laws which do not have to be the moral, the inviolability of those rules, the creation of a new order and costumes, were applicable to other things, as, for example, to religious ceremonies. Bayonne has realized that those rules are valid for children's superstitions, to the spirit world, and at the same time, to the threads that bind to the viewer with what happens inside a fiction. The son of the protagonist has an invisible friend that plays at all hours. Mother listens patiently to the fantasy of his son, but the father is concerned. A game to which the boy plays with his invisible friends is the hide things. When the child disappears the mother did not find anyone who can help you find it. You will need to search within itself. You will have to learn how to play if you want to see his son.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3420

Bloody Will

Leones por Corderos

muchocine

Pure political pamphlet of Robert Redford on the situation of the United States currently.

Pure political pamphlet of Robert Redord on the situation of the United States currently. Thus it is 'Lions for Lambs', one of the most political films I've seen since ' All the President's men the', and who coincidentally also has the actor on his cast. Commercial career of this film has has his worst enemy in itself: that is not commercial. Actually I wasn't quite sure what he was going to see in the seventh movie as director Redford. political thriller?, does war thriller? the truth is that with the trailers expected otherwise. Quitemosle about thriller in all its meanings. The little hour and twenty that lasts the film is more than enough to tell what the director intended: the mistakes they commit the USA with its presence in Iraq from the point of view of one of the sides this is a partisan documentary with narrators of luxury, neither more nor less.Three unique scenes are the backbone of the film: A Congressman (Cruise) that uses a journalist (Streep) to launch the new strategy military in the country in conflict. A Professor (Redford) who tries to motivate some of its best students (Andrew Garfield), and two soldiers (Michael Peña and Derek Luke) lost in the line enemy. With only these three situations, Redford is mounted a do ético-moral of hangovers with an underscore so lengthy and cumbersome as his criticism of Bush.El problem of having things from a point of view is only in the end not is if it has is a pretentious or have every reason in the world. From the distance of not having controlled the political systems in the USA all sounds to me Chinese, which should be comparable to project in American theaters 'Las 13 Rosas', 'Libertarian', 'Wolf' or 'GAL', but with the subtle difference that in these last at least has a plot. 'Lions for Lambs' ends with an inevitable: ' do and now what?, in that we have been? ' constant discourse about whether the war is good or bad, if the money invested is much or little, if the politicians of the country are a few interested or not, whether soldiers are the innocent, about how much involved should be one with the circumstances to weary, rhetoric and propaganda redfordiana that really doesn't interest me, or at least not in this way. Let's see if 'in the Valley of Elah', which aims to be equally critical avoids sank in as much moral depth.Already accepted the fact that the movie has nothing and is only a political of $ 35 million program, go to drinking all of their footage: its actors. The best thing that can happen to the film is that one be a nomination to the Oscars, at least to be able to boast of some success in the project. The nomination shall not be the Redford, which repeated undaunted its deep man pose, and everything points to Streep and Cruise as safe candidates.Sincerely, extensive conversation with Congressman and journalist in the Office have been the unique moments that I have taken out of absolute boredom. What talk is still political 100% but is curious to see how they are handled two such different actors face to face. Of course Streep WINS by a landslide, as always, but I pleased to say that Cruise brings an excellent note, with a paper short and fair, ideal to not make mistakes of overacting and perfect for a secondary nomination. Everything will be.Ultimately, difficult is judging a script when everything is information, policy and State speeches. I am now as if you just see a Michael Moore film without less thank you very much, without as much bad milk and with much artificial fire to encourage him. More difficult is valuing its players when all do in favour to mark speechs of those that are very well on screen but do not contribute anything. Difficult it will be to mouth not ends up with its box office. 'Lions for Lambs' will go down in history as the story of the most expensive American Democratic Party of history. Some will seem more than correct and poignant, but I still think it has squandered an opportunity of luxury for a thriller of those that cut the breath. That could be expected from Redford when grab runout

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2662

El vengador toxico

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

I have to say that Interestingly the film reminds me the evolution of the series. Begins dramatically and has a very bright part, for ir decaying as it approaches the end.

Because finally they made the film in the series that revolutionized the world of animation. We already know what often happens with movies series, giving rise to such magnificent movies such as X-files, the Avengers, lost in space? where have the Simpsons been?I've been fan of Simpsons since almost 20 years ago cast the first episode in the 2 to that of eleven and peak of the night. But it is also true that over the years has been declining, and fails to maintain the high level of the first four or five seasons.So I had all my reservations about the film, is at the beginning? It will be in the end? It will be worse?I have to say that Interestingly the film reminds me the evolution of the series. Begins dramatically and has a very bright part, for ir decaying as it approaches the end.The movie begins in a cinema, where the Simpsons come to see the last premiere of "Rasca y Pica" (his favorite drawings) and where Homer says that all those who do not see the pirated movie at home are fooled. At the moment we see the classic start of modified Simpsons, Bart copying on the Blackboard that not pirateará the movie!.In this first part really is distilled a good dose of acidity, which reminds us of those first seasons. The plot focuses on the large contamination of Lake Springfield, and as Homer manages to put his invaluable help to the disaster.I have seen the movie at 6 in the afternoon at a shopping mall surrounded by teenagers who just pillaban any fairly elaborate joke. I think that I was the only one who has laughed in the first scene with the President of the USA. That, in the second part, no longer endured more and were commenting on where would go to the exit. I will not see a taquillazo at meeting of teenagers, I will not see a taquillazo at meeting of teenagers, I will not see a taquillazo in?From the moment, as we approach the denouement, the film loses ingenuity starts, becomes more friendly and directs us towards a happy ending. It is true that the episodes of the Simpsons have just almost always, but in this case quite mordacidaz is lost.Anyway, I think that any fan of the Simpsons, for the film is justified by those first 45-60 minutes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1026

Rafa Martín

La alianza del mal

muchocine

I do not usually make firewood from the fallen tree (lie) and I don't like to go left (lie as a lousy bellaco) but this is too much. Jesus, what piece of shit movie.

The Geneva Convention has a new problem and is called The Covenant, is headed by Renny Harlin and hope they rented costumes anti-radiation in cinemas where release. I do not usually make firewood from the fallen tree (lie) and I don't like to go left (lie as a lousy bellaco) but this is too much. Yes, it is worse that it Alone in The Dark and Yes, Juan Manuel de Prada has another lover that bedtime. Jesus, what piece of shit movie.Perhaps it is not blamed for the director that bore the extraordinary imperial, wonderful (undisputed) maximum risk, which has counted with the budget of the part of the episode of charmed before advertising, but very badly must go you things to finish directing this pit of darkness. Disguised as a normal film, The Covenant follows the adventures of four young mages (and an egg: they are older than the initial lineup of Real Madrid, but colleagues caused a diametrical rules change so we spent the subject) who are facing a powerful malevolent force which threatens to take his powers and live like this forever. But it is unfair to thus define the plot of the film. Let's say that once explained the percale, for nothing, you again it to explain again (obviously the producers realize that the bulk of the film only covers 19 minutes and stretch). "Torture is extended to unimaginable extremes."Do you want thread of fishing? "As it takes."From the initial credit titles, where the band Tomandandy undertakes to crush us eardrums to get mashed and will continue over the footage, the first scene includes the four mamarrachos these dressed in black causing vomiting (literally) at a party of Institute (of those so cool, in the light of the fire) and making levitate a jeep to flee policethat or he bother to investigate as fuck the car chase is capable of jumping a ravine and end up falling from 30 meters behind his car patrol. Another sequence in which a car is reassembled from scratch after stamped on front against a truck hardly will thus be of concern in the Walker Texas Ranger. Anyone can point out inconsistencies and comings of pot in a movie, but The Covenant as the best truño displays with pride.The cast. Ay. This is the moment in which Harlin, breaking again with his line, it is believed Verhoeven. The four notes are outfits for Calvin Klein and, in addition, swimming champions. Unid points. Right: festival of abdominal, fights in the showers to coup towel, homoerotic, homocoche y. homomotocicleta unresolved, attraction perpetual state of fornication, girls in the film from time to time are dressed and carefully studied bodybuilders poses so that they appear spontaneous. To the Juani will seem fucking great. To my truth is that you'm me the same. He is the youngest of the problems of the film and is a damn joke.It is almost more painful to see how Harlin retains something of what it made him a director of class A in the action genre in Hollywood, as his sense of rhythm, while his newly found love of the music video is everywhere. The famed Slavic critic Rofl Merthinson stated in his "of the film, the praxis and stuff that exploit" that "If the public do not understand it, hipnotizalo", but this is concentrated Guantánamo. Please refer to the final match, where the good and the bad are thrown balls of transparent gelatin that exploit contact during 10 minutes Damn straight. There is only an audiovisual production worldwide employing this type of style. Ésta. the chavalería throwing rites.I rhubarb refer much more the rest of the plot, such as the mother of the protagonist, the ghost that appears and disappears, the historical background of the people etc, etc. If the writer of this, it is normal that I do so, too. Only one last thought to be done and refers to the horror genre, taking account of the succession in diarrhea of films that are making us go through scary movies. Why when you make a comedy of shit - see Spain - simply isn't funny and when you do a bad movie of terror touches the bottom of the barrel? Is this genus more difficult than it initially appears? Or is that we simply do not asustamos as before? And most importantly, after suffering from this scum of film: someone can provide me a sharp knife? Because my veins and death have an early appointment.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2884

Matías Cobo

Death Proof

muchocine

Cannot conceal my admiration for the film of this man who, with just five films written and directed by him, I believe that it has reached a quick status of author with a film that, although it is not tasteful dish for many, offers always a movie fan passion that breathed by every one of its frames.

Death Proof is the underside of the same currency that the Tarantino/Rodriguez tandem has coined as tribute to a film of terror and action that wasted originality and transgression in even conservative film times. With limited budgets and chapucero-artesanales technical solutions, those filmmakers pioneers made the need for virtue and only sought to unleash their gruesome imaginations. Sam Raimi, Wes Craven, Cronenberg, Carpenter or Peter Jackson, among others, were some of the directors that were forged in the school of viscera and blood. Today they all have recognized careers as filmmakers, but its blanks left those misunderstood and marginal tape for its majority contemporary public.If Rodriguez dealt in Planet Terror by referencing the terror 'gore', one of the aspects that the Mexican has shown more lair in initiatory tapes theirs as open until dawn, Tarantino has decided to address his tribute to wild racing movies. Regarding point limit zero or 60 seconds, quoted verbatim in dialogues that Tarantino has been on the lips of his characters, are the basis of cinephiles envelope which supports Death Proof.Pero stays there. Because in Death Proof again appear the arsenal of clichés of his filmography: as long dialogues between colleagues on the most absurd trivia, filming scenes with eagerness to posterity accompanied by excellent songs (the revision to the soundtracks of his films reveal Tarantino as a great 'gourmet' classic American musicals and as a lover of morriconianas scores) and the creation of extreme characters able to move from a State of relaxation another of brutal violence without just worry. And praise without dissimulation I film preferences or to vituperar mercilessly cinema that detests, Tarantino not it hurt in clothing becoming several impudent autohomenajes with nod to tape his own recent as Kill Bill. For example, great is the reappearance of two already mythical characters as ranger Earl McGraw (with the moroseness and impavidez of the great Michael Parks) and his son number 1 (own son of Parks, James Parks). The slow and crude analyses that make the brutal crimes that often face are the best sample of kid humor distilled by the Director of Tennessee.Y Finally, for unconditional Tarantino as who writes this, in Death Proof again to enjoy with interpretaciones-trasunto of the glorious past of big players such as Kurt Russell (who Tarantino loves his early works with Carpenter)(, as Escape from New York or the thing). In addition, and following the traits typical of women in his films, Tarantino returned to create a showcase of various female characters: sexy, strong, chulescos and determined. You could say the replica of Tarantino to the profile of the chica-Almodóvar is of a woman beautiful, with strong appeal sexual, intelligent, and hard and sensitive at a time. The cast of girls-Tarantino in Death Proof, from Rosario Dawson to Vanessa Ferlito, are excellent in their respective roles.In short, I cannot conceal my admiration for the film of this man who, with just five films written and directed by him, I think that it has reached a quick status of author with a film that, although it is not tasteful dish for many, offers always a movie fan passion breathed by every one of its frames.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/252

Ibán Manzano

La tumba de las luciérnagas

muchocine

The most successful of Isao Takahata in addition to a Summit for the genre

It has their same hallmarks as well as the signing of the Studio Ghibli, however we are not talking of Hayao Miyazaki but Isao Takahata. With races similar and occasionally shared framework (Heidi) the second has been more experimental and therefore more irregular. Grave of the fireflies is his most successful film as well as a Summit for the genre. So much so that a prestigious American critic noted that you it's a masterpiece of vision required for everyone, but especially for those who still dare to deny the bread to the animation. Children are children and need their mothers. Marco toured half world Italy Los Andes to meet yours. Seita, our protagonist, does not have that opportunity: it is possible that his parents is them has taken the World War II. Its priority must be to protect his sister, mature quickly, and lose her children so she can preserve yours. This is his sacrifice, accept responsibility and his sister can keep dreaming without hearing that his fall around bombs and dies people everywhere. Only thing good is that more than Seita in aging always to strive you it will be something of the child that was inside, that that builds a tomb with fireflies convinced that it is the best possible bunker against human barbarism.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3966

Plissken

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

'The Oxford crimes' serves to show us to a church less strained and spectacular, but can always get bad milk from a very conventional history.

Alex de la Iglesia, is back with an unusual proposal therein: a mathematical thriller. 'The crimes of Oxford' is returning to the international production, and demonstrates that baggy budgets and the film genre are not a secret for him. These crimes also serve to show us to a church less strained and spectacular, but can always get the bad milk from a so conventional history, in the background.Martin (an Elijah Wood too "frodiano") travels to Oxford for his thesis of end of career, with the hope that the prestigious Arthur Seldom (master John Hurt) matemáitco is your agent. The irruption of an enigmatic serial killer will be that Martin and Seldom become gentlemen detectives in a race to discover the pattern of a few crimes that seem specifically designed to challenge them.Accompanied by his usual and supported in a powerful distribution team, Alex de la Iglesia gives us a production that moves with ease by all clichés of the genre, sometimes perhaps too. Based on the novel by the Argentine Guillermo Martínez, director and Jorge Guerricaechevarría continue the lines of standard detective film, including a handful of suspects, an inept police and references to the theory of chaos, the number Pi, the golden ratio or the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg (Ah, mathematics, how much glamour added to a plot). In the end, as usual, the equation is simplified and clears something softly and tramposilla, but effective. Another good example that Spanish managers also know to make cinema in the face of the average viewer, perhaps without too much brightness but not deceive or offend the public.And even moving in conventional land, the highlights of these 'Oxford crimes' are already common tics of Bilbao, as secondary desquiciados and desquiciantes, esperpénticos corpses or the time "level stream virtuoso", which in this case manages to link in a magnificent way to all the key characters in the film in a camera movement to the purest style "intro to the Simpsons".In the chapter of interpretations, a wobbly Elijah Wood gives the weight of the film to this huge presence that is John Hurt. In a role originally intended for Michael Caine or Jeremy Irons, Hurt recreates with a cynical and pedantic, character committed to demonstrate that there is no truth through words, gestures, looks. the same Church has pointed out that the essence of the film condenses in the face of British actor, in their ability to communicate that the only truth is that there is no truth to 100%. The rest of the cast is a wonderful Julie Cox, leaving Leonor Watling, Dominique Pinon and a histrionic Burn Gorman in a flat second discrete.And on the technical side, Kiko de la Rica get a great visual invoice (with brilliant moments as the quoted level sequence). The correct artistic direction is carried out from Maria Chryssikos, and music by Roque Baños alternates brilliant moments with others in which stresses too.In short, positive for the first great Spanish production of the year. Perhaps lack something of force in its resolution and perhaps a protagonist with more grip would have left better taste but still Alex de la Iglesia of bide them to satisfy fans of the detective genre. A 6'5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/897

José Córdoba

Casino Royale

muchocine

It is a very intelligent and vibrant redesign of the character, in addition to an entretenidísima movie that leaves you glued to the seat for two hours and fourth.

Daniel Craig must be a happy man right now. After the entire campaign orchestrated against him by his choice to play secret spy most famous (curious contradiction) history, swords were high and the expectation was higher than the previous changes of face of the character. And the result was not disappointed, it is more is liking much.Much has been saying for the past year on which the series was exhausted, the character already tired than that which. I always found me funny this whole debate because the previous film, die another day (Die another day), starring Pierce Brosnan, was not only not a failure but that it wasn't the most box office film of the saga. So strictly speaking, made change was not necessary from an economic point of view. Although it is also true that the scale of the last project at all levels, it was difficult to overcome.Casino Royale was the first novel written by Ian Fleming of James Bond character, and already had two previous adaptations one for TV and one in the form of parody shot in the 1960s which had five directors, a cast where it appeared from David Niven until Peter Sellers passing by Woody Allen, and posed one of the most expensive Follies ever funded a large study. The plot narrates the confrontation of Bond, newly obtained his license to kill (the double zero), with LeChifre, a banker who manages the revenues generated by gangs of drug traffickers and terrorists. The plot is quite simple and easy to remain its peak the poker game that takes place in the casino that gives its name to the film.The new James Bond adventure is probably, and lack of seeing Déjà Vu of Tony Scott, the best film of the genre of Action released this year. It maintains Moreover all constants of the saga: stunning women, multiplicity of scenery, luxurious environments and scenes of action was. Changes, that there are, are not as spectacular as it has been saying. We have two women Bond, a vase (and quickly dispatched) and other intelligent that accompanies the hero in his adventures, as in other films in the series, you does not go very far, in the films starring Brosnan women were more than simple objects and throw-away. Perhaps Yes has gained in realism in the action scenes, nor too much at the end and at Cape is a Bond film, but has been dramatically reduced the use of spectacular Gadgets or more elements of a science fiction to film one of spies that runs today. Where he is most noticeable change is the main character. The film designed by way of a James Bond Begins is the redefinition of the character, telling their origins to begin a new series. Thus we are witnessing its first Martini mixed, not hectic, its first Aston Martin and a long list of details that will delight fans of the saga. This idea extends to the music section, makes mild notes of the theme written by Monty Norman and immortalized by John Barry, and only heard in its entirety in the last scene film. In this sense the film resembles Indiana Jones and the last crusade, where we discovered the origin of many details of the character.The Bond played by Daniel Craig is credible, hard and ironic, capable of falling in love and suffer. Appears to a human being, something which had disappeared after the secret service of his Majesty (film that keeps more than one point in common). The choice of the actor turned out perfect because it gives surprising charisma and a physical presence to the character. But the rest of the cast has not been neglected, starting with an intelligent and sensual but nearby Eva Green, and continuing with a wonderful Judi Dench as M or a very suitable Giancarlo Giannini. Perhaps the downside in terms of character her we find in the villain role, a character devoid of charisma and strength, than not takes advantage of its physical peculiarity (cries blood).Matin Campbell, who was director of Goldeneye and the mask of Zorro, again to show how the effective director who is, though not brilliant, not known to take advantage of the filming of the poker game where a best director, John McTiernam and Richard Donner, could have done wonders. Without embargo in the action scenes draw out all his potential but we should not forget about the work of the director of second unit and, above all, by Stuart Baird, probably the best editor of action cinema that has American cinema today.The script is agile and fun, with some surprise and some magnificent dialogues between Craig and Green, well-publicised, certainly by the chemistry there on screen between both actors. However the multiplicity of late and the long duration of the film do lose something of bellows in the last third.The picture is very correct, emphasizing the use of a magnificent black and white in the sequence pre-créditos which opens the film. The music of Arnold is functional in the film, zacchia or romantic as appropriate, but not especially remarkable, a far cry from the scores written by Barry and lower other endorsed as the tomorrow never Muere.Vuelve Bond and returned to stay. Casino Royale is a very intelligent and vibrant redesign of the character, in addition to an entretenidísima movie that leaves you glued to the seat for two hours and the fourth so it serves its objective outweigh. Long live James Bond.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2

Torbe

La guerra de los mundos

muchocine

Until the balls of the Yankees

Each time I least like cinema of masses. The movies they see everyone seem increasingly more pain in the ass and jerks. Not be why but the prota is always stupid ass is lucky, and at the end of the movie, when it succeeded in defeating evil, it becomes ready, and the crap that to at the beginning of the movie disappear as if by magic. It becomes mature and intelligent.This movie from Spielberg is more of the same, escape and flee and do not give a shot. In addition the bastard has got a couple of actors which is to lend them to eat separately. The girl, an old stuck in the body of a girl, because you just have to see him speak (in original version of course) to realize is that we we have one of the great film freaks. Is CTS makes grace the baby when he speaks like su puta madre, but my cause me fear. See a cria who speaks as a mature person is something awful. Children are children and see them outside their role scares.Then this the teenage son who has the Cruise. Another moron that is to give of slaps on the face until see you the bone to the hand. Faithful reflection of what is called military manipulation, the boy wants to kill the bugs without any weapon, hale, crazy and without thinking, come on, a sack.You want to tell you, but to me that I think fanaticism and madness. Someone wants to go to fight without means is to go to a certain death, why fuck me greatly which at the end of the movie appears this the mongo and his grandparents and all the family. All God is saved, and above the old appears in suit on Sundays and all maquillada.¿Pero sinsorgada is this? Just need to Cruise again with his ex-wife and that the world is much better. Quiet, I tell you the end of the movie but nothing, happens all the movies end up in the same way, and say that not remains mystery to the crappy this. I not be will Spielberg, but this step will only become a director who is good doing special effects, because what is telling stories? not you account you gave that Americans do not know to keep their composure? All say it screaming. In difficult moments it more sensible is to chill out and not be discussed by jets, and in all the fucking movie don't stop shouting and paste among them.It makes me laugh at the beginning of the movie, when the soil begins to crumble, people stop there to watch what happens. Damn, not be them, but I would be running like a bitch for some time, and hiding me. If I see that a bug is launching rays and crushing to God, I hide.Anyway, that to continue talking about this shit, if what they wanted have already done, which is to pagasemos the entry, why I believe that it is going to film his cousin, now me it it down all Internet, that so you can see, the quality of the movies is acceptable, and I can pass palante. Nowadays not be commanded with the forward hand is to die.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4070

Javier G. Pasamón

El verano de kikujiro

muchocine

Kitano builds a beautiful minimalist fable. A film delicious and extremely fun, not without moments of great cinema. The very best of recent Japanese cinema.

Masao (Yusuke Sekiguchi) lives with her grandmother. One day finds a photo of his mother and decides to look for her. But Masao may not travel alone, so a friend of her grandmother, Kikujiro, offers to help you in your search. It seems the ideal company is an accustomed to easy money type and is not equipped to deal with children and less with a child as sensitive as the small Masao. But he will soon reveal that both have in common more than it seems; Masao will discover that the world is meaningless without a bit of magic and Kikujiro learn that sometimes, a simple game of children teaches us what does not work in our own lives. Reminiscent of Jacques Tati "my uncle" or "The boy" by Charles Chaplin, in 1999, Takeshi Kitano, finished his eighth film: "The summer of Kikujiro". After his previous films police forces and full of violence that did not exempt his personal humor, such as "Sonatine" or the award-winning "Hana-Bi (fire flower)", in "The summer of Kikujiro" departs from this kind of film, to deliver us a delicious comedy full of vitality and message. It is a road movie that joins comedy with drama in an exemplary manner. The film opens with an image of Masao crossing a long bridge in the city of Tokyo (where we can see that it has already been the Angel Wings, which gave him a few puppeteers, hung his backpack) and from there occurs a huge flashback we are dealing with the rest of the film until the end. Kitano separates the film in various episodes as if it were summer Masao book. These episodes are the following: the friends of the grandmother, the man that is scary, the Lord is very rare, it went wrong, the Bell's Angels, the Lord play with me, the Lord falls down the stairs, the Octopus man, goodbye. Masao crossing the summer puenteLlega and Masao, a child of 8 years, only stays in the city. He lives with his grandmother who works and his mother lives outside working to earn money for him so his grandmother tells him that he must study hard and strive, to part him her has ever. To make matters worse, his friends as Yuji leave vacation to the beach with their respective families. The poor Masao suspected that this summer will be a boredom, a summer full of loneliness and boredom (see the bleak scene of the field of football and the mockery that makes the man going by bicycle (one of the almost ubiquitous things in the Filmography of Kitano) to Masao, who has gone there with his clothing and the ball). One day, while the grandmother was at work, comes the postman and gives a letter. To see her Masao, he sees that it is his mother. Point the direction, collect their savings and decides to look for her and finally meet her. The friends of his grandmother (Kikujiro and his wife), decide that he, Kikujiro, accompany Masao on his trip. Here us occurs to Kikujiro (Beat Takeshi) as a carefree man, without apparent task or work. We are told that he is a man without studies due to his laziness and already gives hints of his later proven arrogance, poor education and pimping rudeness. Kikujiro giving a lesson of irresponsibility, the first site where leads to Masao is bicycle racing. Bet all the money that has more saved by the child, and for more INRIA the only time they earn they spend it on sleep a night in a luxury hotel. There occurs the first dreams of Masao. Note that flat from within surrealist of the glass where the champagne is poured. Below you can see other somewhat risky planes such as the vision of the Dragonfly or the Masao and Kikujiro reflex on the wheel of a car. From there embark on a journey in search of the mother of Masao, Kikujiro will try by all means have fun and replace the misfortunes or disappointments for children's elements and actions that move between the chaplinesco and absurdity. Due to the spending of money given by his wife to Kikujiro more saved by Masao, both are aimed at pulular on the roads in search of someone to carry them or simply walk. Kitano in the film baby much silent film, large silent films such as Charles Chaplin or Buster Keaton. However, not leaves behind his more circus side and gives us a series of numbers to the purest style humor amarilloque plays with absurdity more radical and sometimes surreal. Kikujiro and Masao by the caminosEn initially, Masao does not trust the Lord, which is how he calls Kikujiro. Kikujiro has shown his lack of maturity despite their midlife, looks almost like a cartoon character, like something strange to know, thanks in part to immature actions committed as bets, the robbery of a taxi, stepping on the grass ignoring the poster which small is not, fishing in a pond of a hotelconfronted with a trucker, impersonate blind, leave the hotel without paying and a long etcetera of circumstances and situations unbecoming of a man of that age and more so if it is in charge of a small. As you will see later, this trip will be a lesson not only for Masao, but also for Kikujiro, which reencontrará about yourself. See that phrase that says Kikujiro when are at the bus stop: "Is very similar to me". The second dream of Masao in this case starring the man that is scary (a pederast who attempted to harass the poor Masao), as if wanting him to do harm, to his side a woman (perhaps representing much sought after mother) which cries and finally the man resembles the back of Kikujiro tattoo, this is evident that crossfade between the tattoo image and the onset of sleep. It comes to say as if also Kikujiro has 2 personalities or faces in life. Kikujiro may have solution and can change and be responsible for something. In subsequent dreams can be seen as the Lord (Kikujiro) adopts a position privileged in them, already trying to an important person and trust in the life of Masao. Second dream of MasaoLa Kikujiro attitude with the characters of this film, so grotesque and way is at least unlikely. Perhaps the fantastic touch of the story and above all the fact of being at the bottom of a fable (remember explained or remembered by Masao, child), explain this. Or perhaps explain it to his last yakuza. In "The summer of Kikujiro" we can see easily 2 clear tributes, one of them very clear. After sticking with a trucker and leave with Masao with a few puppeteers in his car, there is a transition from the stick to the Orange, that reminds us inevitably to the mythical scene of "2001: A Space Odyssey", the scene of what is the tool, its importance and its usefulness. In a transition or ellipsis, of course, shorter, simpler and less elaborate than in the Kubrick film. Another homage is to "Kagemusha". Masao dreams remind us of the dreams of the ersatz in the Kurosawa film. Kitano is a self-confessed fan of Akira Kurosawa. Going through a bridge, after having left the poet. Fishing in the pond of the hotel. Waiting, call for Kikujiro: "the oldest bus stop in the world" when they finally come to the place where supposedly have to find the mother of Masao, produces one of the most beautiful scenes of the film. In fact, there already does not live his mother, and the pessimism and the sadness seizes Masao fleeing towards the Sea (another key element in the Filmography of Kitano and pillar of films like e.g. "Hana-Bi" or "A Scene at the be"). Kikujiro will then make you a gift and will earn part of the affection of Masao. In this case, the deception will be pious not as in none of the previous occasions, it tells that it is a gift that has left him his mother, when it is not. Face of disappointments of Masao and Kikujiro after the frustrated encounter with his mother. The moment when they leave the beach and decide to return home. In the final section of the film, both are in circumstantial camping accompanied by calls Mr. Nice (a poet who rediscovered it after having them removed from the bus stop) and Mr. Gordo and Mr. Bald (naive motorists). And here begins the festival of humor yellow made in Kitano full of absurdidades and children's playground only to remove head to Masao anguish that causes him not knowing again where is his mother and above all not be able seeing. And Kikujiro "abused them" using them as "soccer ball" so that the child have fun as for example: motorists making fish, Octopus (for fish that the river no longer fish), games with strings, the Indians, game if I see you pay garment, dress extraterrestrial, . and many more kitanianas squalor. And it is to these characters, Kitano, it presents them as clumsy, naive, deluded, but with great background and a heart which do not mind losing their dignity as that Masao laugh and you have big. Masao playing a game with these unique cartoon in the world kitaniano. In this section there is a paragraph where Kikujiro takes a moment to visit his mother which is entered in a residence or hospital relatively close to the place of the campsite. When he sees, Kikujiro enters a state similar to which had been Masao after the disappointment caused by the expectation frustrated to see his mother. And begins to give account that have to change their attitude to life and others. At the end of the film in a scene to remember, Masao asks to the until now called Mr which is his real name, and this tells Kikujiro. And he promises that they will return back to find his mother. Nice, the poet. Kitano became interested in painting after the serious accident suffered by a few years ago. "Hana-Bi", even in "Battle Royale" appear in some of his paintings. It has been a journey of learning for both very fruitful. They have proven although it seemed that initially they had nothing in common, at the end seems to be that it was not true. It is the beginning of a friendship and mutual affection. The film itself, represents a lesson important Masao: that there are to keep fighting for want you without leaving it be. To Kikujiro journey has taught him that it is able to deal with someone, take responsibility for something if you want to. Initially, seemed the least suitable person to accompany the small but despite the difficulties and the irresponsible committed by him it has complied with the deal agreed with his wife. And it is that sometimes a simple child's play teaches one what does not work in his own life. Both left and 2 unknown with so many things in common unknown to the 2, as for example that both adore their mothers feel unable to be with them. In the circumstantial camping. The fact that the voyage in question has been more important for Kikujiro to Masao, who I think it is obvious, it is also reflected in the title of the film, when the protagonist is apparently Masao and is for him to be both travel. In "The summer of Kikujiro", the music is borne by one of the illustrious contributors to Kitano: Joe Hisaishi (which has also incidentally, composed for the Studio Ghibli films directed by the great Hayao Miyazaki). A melody that unites simplicity with quality which inevitably produces nostalgia. Along with Kenji Kawai ("Avalon", "Princess Blade", "Ghost in the shell", "Innocence"), one of the best composers of current Japanese soundtracks. The main theme is one of the best scores of Hisaishi so far. As an anecdote to say that partly this film is a tribute to the father of Takeshi Kitano, curiously named Kikujiro. The relationship that occur in the film between Masao and Kikujiro is similar, only it is partly clear. His father, seems to be that it was a distant person, with little relation to his son (Takeshi), we saw as a hard character but with a good heart as the film Kikujiro (ex-yakuza problematic and insultón but with a great heart and ultimately an exceptional person). In conclusion, "The summer of Kikujiro" is a beautiful, minimalist fable and that it will please all audiences for the first time in a movie of Kitano, since they are usual Eastern film or not, because what it conveys is a universal message and uses a language (except in the dreams of Masao) linial and without too many narrative uses as abstract as in the majority of his remaining filmography. And another thing to keep in mind, the violence is practically non-existent in this film. Kitano always surprises us in every one of his movies. It is capable of making films with large doses of violence, comical or chambara and succeed in the attempt, and I think that we we have one of the best filmmakers of today and possibly history. A film delicious and extremely fun, not without moments of great cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1493

Ricard Marcet

Los paraguas de Cherburgo

muchocine

Scenes such as the sad farewell of lovers, and an ending very close to our reality, will recall us that, despite achieved maturity by its Viewer and the film, the screen can follow overwhelmed with emotion.

After an elegant camera movement, the privileged spectator looks the becoming of people down the street from a Zenithal perspective. It begins to rain on the cobblestones that fill the screen as if it were a brick wall. The credits of the movie are projected on the wall. Pedestrians, covered entirely by their colored umbrellas, glide among the names of those responsible for the film as if they were obstacles. Thus, to the beat of the music of Michel Legrand, typography and walking umbrella dance together forgetting their different nature.With this choreographic game, in my opinion, representative of what will be the subsequent footage begins the umbrellas of Cherbourg, film that Jacques Demy lead the Golden Palm of Cannes in 1964. Geneviève is an attractive young woman who lives with her mother and to help in the shop of umbrellas that have. You will know a Guy, a kind-hearted and handsome mechanic, and immediately they love. While Madame Emery, the mother of Geneviève, does not approve the relationship by the youth of his daughter and the poverty of Guy, which separates the couple will be military service: he will be allocated two years to Algeria and may not return to see. Pregnant of her beloved, but without hearing from you, Geneviève bow to his mother's wishes and marry Roland Cassard, a rich salesman of jewels. Some time later, Guy will return to the city.Judging from the plot of the film, which already was told us more than once, we might think that we are faced with a melodramatic musical anyone; However, it will not take to realise that we are faced with an unusual film. After the opening credits commented, we will be surprised by a few characters who speak singing. Nor spectacular numbers inserted by force or musical moments, motivated by the plot; in the film Cherbourg of Demy, in which the real landscapes submit the saturated colors of the decorations of the musical genre, singing is the natural form of expression of the characters that inhabit it.The concern invades the spectator: we are faced with the sublimation of the constants of the genre? To a tribute? Perplexed with the recital which does not cease and the choreography perfect camera and commissioning scene, we can not get question about why such technical feat. A classic and predictable structure crystallized in three episodes that betray the framework of enunciation, as well as a few stereotypical characters arriving even in gold on his own condition (Madame Emery: Solo dies of love in the movies!), induce us to ask ourselves the linguistic nature of what we are seeing, and to understand the innovative contract offered by Jacques Demy: The director chooses to cut with the shackles that enslaves the worn-out film musical theatrical tradition, leaving aside the cabaretero number and becoming the constants of the genus codes that govern the world of the film, which determine its nature. Thus, hand of Demy, the musical ceases to be a combination of elements of diverse origin to become a way of narrating essentially cinematic.Is true that the earlier conclusion is the result of a reflection after viewing of the film, however, we can confirm the aware the viewer's position during the screening of the film. Only through their willingness to participate in the game raised by Demy, we can explain his involvement in a world that wanted so airtight. The spectator gets rid of his cuirass voluntarily and is shown vulnerable, allowing, thus, that at first get you to seem laughable, touches him deeply. Scenes such as the sad farewell of lovers, and an ending very close to our reality, will recall us that, despite achieved maturity by its Viewer and the film, the screen can follow overwhelmed with emotion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1609

Silvia Giner

Teresa, el cuerpo de Cristo

muchocine

The poster for the film is misleading and inappropriate, addressed to all those who want to see in the dark meat, accustomed to see peace in all its splendor, has been used pull sexy actress in order to box office, it would be pq knew that they were selling shit story, pity the truth with how great it is the story of Teresa.

While I've been filled with excitement to see this film, I found one crappy to add to my list of bodios 2007. As almost everything is horrible in this film I will mention the little good that there are, which is music, clothing and photography.Ironcita puts mode + Despelleje: If what issue was to portray the life of Teresa of Jesus, have been covered with glory, first because missing footage to tell this woman's work, would need dozens of films for this. Second that the script is pathetic and third because the passage in the life of Teresa who has chosen is frankly wrong counted. There is a saying in Madrid film school directors "If you have fucked, molten" and is abusing the fades is an attempt to cover up a loose script. Teresa, the body of Christ, is not loose is non-existent, I have more than 25 fades to black (of output) in the film. With the titles of entry remained "stuck" because they last like 6 minutes, this is unnecessary and also pre-duerme to the Viewer.Even a risk of never give me a role, I have to say to fuck, poorly directed is. terrible.And with all these atrocities the interpretation would not be bright, is linear almost all characters that lack of Fund, the capacity of this film is incredible to look like insnificantes characters with both historical background. So because of this hardly worth talking, we then focus the attention on starring Paz Vega, which have led very badly, the Castilian accent is not achieved, peace is forzadísima in his dialogues, despite the fact that this role not going anything. It is a great character to build in so few mintutos (which on the other hand will make eternal). Peace will most characters of the type "Lucia and sex" (example of what good is well targeting the actresses) or "Spanglish", Teresa you has been great peace, not is whether by the ill-fated direction or that she has failed build correctly this character, but is not really credible and their records are too theatrical. At least not we had to see the feet in the foreground. Although hayq ei say that the profile if it was physical. I have seen better here to Pilar López Ayala.El movie poster is misleading and inappropriate, addressed to all those who want to see in the dark meat, accustomed to see peace in all its splendor, has been used pull sexy actress in order to box office, it would be pq knew that they were selling a shit of history, that pity the truth with how great it is the story of Teresa.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1659

Tito Chinchan

Hannibal: El origen del mal

muchocine

Unpleasant film about the most famous fiction canibal. It is long and is long. It is unpleasant and remove the stomach and consciousness. Anything I liked, but I recognize him that he manages to convey.

That laughter with my medium Zucchini, which I say see Hannibal's and tells me that I did not know that they had recorded no film of the conqueror. Hey, since it would be nice that they take one of Hannibal with his elephants charging on Rome, rather than these you prequels that are already beginning to smell. They could even take advantage of sceneries and extras and make a "Hannibal and the Jedi against the orcs of Persia". Tremedo peliculón, with Peter Jackson doing the extended for 6 days and 200 DVDs of extension. Jajajajaja, is that as the movie is bad, I have to give a touch of interest.The film is about Hannibal Lecter, a boy who lost his childhood and his family at the end of World War II. Total, which already teenager decides to devote his life to chase that ended with his family and step eat their cheeks. And also get a Japanese who lost everything with the atomic bomb and a police officer who chases the bad guys but not to eat them. And little more, really, are all the time with flashbacks of those.Well, the movie I did not like absolutely nothing. It is disgusting, with a continuous reminder of a horrible and scary scene. Which children have small, abstain from watching the film, then you will have nightmares. The actor who plays Hannibal is extrañísimo, with a deadpan face that hit nothing. We then sell this canibal as a sort of vigilante swordsman that softens not the Fund, which is what then eats them. In positive terms, photography is very good, with a few magnificent plans, but simply that good.In short, unpleasant film about the most famous fiction canibal. It is long and is long. It is unpleasant and remove the stomach and soul. Anything I liked, but I recognize him that he manages to convey.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4120

Sandra Ríos

La Sombra del Reino

muchocine

If the personal taste is to see 100 percent action without paying the necessary attention to the characters and the story, this film is the ideal.

Lead to the big screen real conflicts which has submerged the war policy of the United States.UU and treat the espinozo subject of relations that this country has held with Saudi Arabia, can be somewhat heroic, something intimately personal such as we saw last year with Lions for Lambs or finally a small, medium or large disaster. This tape of the actor, screenwriter, producer and director Peter Berg was approached by my last option and what little I will talk about this tape so will show it.If the personal taste is to see 100 percent action without paying the necessary attention to the characters and the story, this film is the ideal. With a writer almost unknown built a story simple, already known and without many pretensions. It makes very clear that the intention is not to take party for one country or another, but for the cotrario reflect the bonds of friendship and humanism while in adverse situations. But although this sounds nice and well mounted, the truth is that history fails to impress. And this eagerness to remedy these relations and the way in which certain Americans are all those of the Middle East is almost failed of its director, giving thanks to the (s) friendship (en) with babies in those regions.I can tell you that the start is very good, in fact it is better with another great scene of great action that occurs on a highway, but from there onwards his pace is slow as they are given a unnecessary extended to certain scenes and so passes between history and bullets until it reaches its end without anything exciting happen. An ending that leaves the plot into nothingness, in a zero point.Actions also liked, Jaime Foxx makes a common role, although admittedly, had no where to take to be able to show off. Its interpretation is equal to others already seen by him. What could better describe their interpretation is when the word "transaction" is mentioned. And definitely not liked anything performance of Jennirfer Garner a role that I think was not for her, or was not the time to accept it because it is very little credible. Lead a woman to the war, a country that little accepts the presence of women in such conflicts, turned out a very forced and element that made the desire to not leave absent this "resort" female film notorious. However and again them, the arguments for the character of Garner do demonstrate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3221

Andrés Pons

Supersalidos

muchocine

A comedy performed brilliantly in all its technical aspects with hilarious situations that with a freshness and irreverence little seen in the American film lately gives us a real feast of laughter from start to finish with a more serious script than it may seem.

GREG MOTTOLA that so far only be towards over the direction of loose episodes of various television series, is blessed by producer JUDD APATOW new King midas of American comedy after taquillazos in Virgin to 40 or reporter. Some very young completely unknown actors in the cast, which include "CLICK" JONAH HILL and MICHAEL CERA "FRECUENCY" which along with all performers move on the small screen.All this is apparently going to change after the tremendous pitch just assume is comedy of teens with their revolutionized hormones. Another example of this subgenre that so many joys tends to provide with hits such as "the exciting course, Desmadre to the American, AmerIcan Pie". what waiting an a comedy of these features? Then simply laugh, objective that met well in all their great GAGS with youngsters that will become the future of great comedians. It is a comedy performed brilliantly in all its technical aspects with hilarious situations that with a freshness and irreverence little seen in the American film lately gives us a real feast of laughter from start to finish with a more serious script than it may seem.Issues such as the transition to adolescence and the changes it entails in its protagonists are treated with enormous effectiveness, where the playful tone looms messages filled with warmth in one of the best comedies of the year.It will have to track them to the director, actors and producer of this film can give us glorious afternoon recovering the Disney comedy of high rank.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3889

Ivan Villamel

Stardust

muchocine

Certainly?Stardust? does it has achieved something that I didn't think that they would be my eyes, play the worst blockbuster of the year honour to?Do Transformers?, congratulations.

After the success of certain trilogy about Middle-Earth (absolutely deserved by the way), opened the way to the adaptation of any kind of history that was part of this imaginary world of the epic fantasy. In this case the work before us is an adaptation of a graphic novel (supposedly prestigious way of life comics) of a such Neil Gaiman, which I must admit that I do not know not only the story adapted into "Stardust", but even any work carried out by the Sr.Gaiman. Because my character profane in this type of written stories, which I admit that the closest thing I've been on them has been with the work Summit Robert E.Howard on true barbaric cimmeria, my gaze has been clean of all influence in dealing with this new épico-fantasioso film viewing, being therefore not susceptible to possible comparisons or allegations of lack of rigour in the film adaptation. Because even in these circumstances, I have not been able to find anything positive enough to qualify this film or even interesting.Behind the scenes we have Matthew Vaughn, London filmmaker whose debut on the big screen for three years, resulted in a great sample of film noir, a great cover letter in society as a capable filmmaker and resourced in order to have the privilege of an interesting career in the genre. Why was a major surprise check as he was in charge of the adaptation of "Stardust" to the film, a story that had few parallels with his film debut, if any. Present in this scene with a great film as "Layer Cake", deserved a certain rigour in dealing with new projects, and unfortunately, Vaughn has not guided by any rigour. All those virtues which had shown in Layer Cake fade at the same speed as the interest might raise in the spectator as palpable shows of mediocrity is finally "Stardust". The staging of Vaughn becomes flat, without narrative pulse or claw to arouse the slightest interest in the spectator, who attends a firing squad of clichés of the genre of heroic fantasy perplexed.The alleged story that would have us believe is about the crusade by a young man named Tristan (nothing to do unfortunately with excellent Celtic legend) to bring his beloved a star that has fallen on the other side of the wall, a place guarded day and night by a security guard that prevents any human to pass to the other side, to the Kingdom of Stornhold (although as we shall see later, the reality is that what is concerned is the inverse way). The problem comes when the alleged Star turns into a beautiful young woman that arouses the interest of various pursuers, all of them with their own motives, from a witch seeking eternal youth, to the children of the King of the place, which will have the privilege of any of them being elected successor on the throne if they reach the precious stone which carries with it such a young.Thus said, history is so confusing and irregular in their development as evidenced by a script full of inconsistencies, lack of pace and a really horrific narrative, giving rise to a sort of crossed stories to which more absurd, without never being balanced in its proposal. Everything happens to an abrupt rhythm, in which the various ramifications of the script override among themselves, without never develop within the subtlety required for the story, a real and confusing headache (and not by complicated in its understanding, but by be runnig). This does not help too some actors who are tremendously conventional in the best of cases, resulting, in my opinion, demeaning the role plays Robert de Niro as a kind of zeppelin or flying boat captain (sic), in a role which, curiously, avoids certain histrionics of his latest (and mostly mediocre) films, but curiously continues to fall in the absolute ridiculous (quote the horrific scene of the attack of one of the sons of the King to the boat)(resolved in a tired absurd and anticlimática manner). The rest of the cast does not walk much better, Michelle Pfeiffer adds nothing to a role that is distant, without charisma (not by his performance but by the flat character development), or Peter O'Toole as the King of the place that only appears briefly and like it would have missed most. Of the best young actors cast not enter much analysis, given that both Charlie Cox, Sienna Miller or Claire Danes (that despicable act when he declares his love to the hero of the function, as little dramatic capacity in such absurd interpretation), are tasteless representing topical characters of telefilm almibarado desktop.Say that little can we rescue of such nonsense, perhaps the beautiful places that illustrate the story throughout the film, or some isolated detail, as the character of Claire Danes effervescent brightness when speeds up your heart, a subtle and accurate detail, marking of a magical and evocative halo. The rest of the elements are worthy of complaint, starting with a history as part of a claim too high in its visual aspect for the null story that shows us, details as a son of a King goes on a chase with just five or six escorts marked a contrast too big with elaborate special effects, the greatness of the intentions in the story just to be a scourge when media intended for the characters or even the film Extras are extremely limited. All this confabula to make "Stardust" a product forgettable and ephemeral, flat characters, resolutions of action hasty and lacking any logic, a humor that is curiously more absurd than any product of lighter intentions, and ultimately, a complete lack of narrative pulse, dan ruined with all intention of credibility in the film. One could speak of have influenced capital works of previous decades in "Stardust", but compare this film to delicacies as "The Princess Bride", "Lady Hawk", "Dark Crystal" or even divertimenti effective and unbiased as "Willow", would be a display of lack of notable real trial. "Stardust" should feel proud to do a work like "The Chronicles of Narnia" may be considered a good film, even less children being deliberately that from its first inception.In short, a bland work is an inconsequential product, and what is worse, boring and less narrative rigor, without nerve claw, predictable and overly sweetened even in certain scenes. Surprised to see how he has had its public sector which it has enjoyed, showing signs of fear by true lovers of cinema of the place toward which he is addressing certain genre cinema, and as ever we become less demanding in terms of quality film, something certainly worrying and that he should think about more than one. The requirement of a minimum of quality should not be an argumentative attitude but a movie buff duty in every rule. Since then, "Stardust" has achieved something that I didn't think that they would be my eyes, dispute the honour of worst blockbuster of the year to "Transformers", congratulations.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/345

Calaf

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

It is a dish of palomitero tasteful for the summer that I recommend without complexes.

Until 5 rooms of 12 of the multiplex which was exhibited the premiere the second part of the trilogy of pirates that is spraying fund-raising records. He broke on the first weekend in USA, recovering nearly half of what it cost, and is already in the ten most successful history.The question is: deserves it? The answer is NO. Is it entertaining? If is it worth going to see the film? If you have quality as so let's head to fill rooms entire cinemas around the world? NOEntonces by what this success? In my view they are a set of circumstances. No one has the key in the world of cinema. But it is clear that producer Jerry Bruckheimer (Top Gun, Armageddon, the Bar Coyote, Pearl Harbor, the search, CSI) has been able to find the key to combining a series of elements that has opened the chest of success: film adventures, stories of series B, humor, action and. Jack Sparrow.Hablando already in the movie, the first half-hour I didn't like. I was a little awkward the way of telling the MacGuffin or plot excuse which would put up the adventure.But soon we get some outstanding action sequences (then comment them in the section best) who put us squarely on the tape with more than smiles.The film, being long, is not heavy and achieves no doubt entertain the Viewer. The characterization of Johnny Depp as Jack Sparrow is one of the pillars of the same. It was risky to give free rein to an ambiguous, drunk and amoral character who however has been Street worldwide. Other characters and situations of humor (although type Solo at home) are also credited the entertainment. Special effects are spectacular (as he is expected, of course) and issue of costumes, locations, etc., he has spared no expenses. But once again we are facing exorbitant action, roller coaster, which aims to reach the largest number of public by expressways without quality entertainment. The secondary roads of the art is not interested in money. You want the main highway.Just have to look at the other films on the list of the most blockbuster: Titanic, Star Wars, E.T., Jurassic Park. except for Independence Day, I would say that they are all better than this. In fact, the keys to success are not new: adventure and humor of B of Star Wars and Indiana Jones series. However not I noticed the excited people out, nor do I think that you cale in the collective memory as did the sagas of Lucas and Spielberg. But today globalization has done that once achieved the ball of success, this becomes much larger to achieve levels that have little to do with the film quality.Still, it is a dish tasteful palomitero for the summer that I recommend without complexes, because it is clear that we will entertain and amuse, without great emotions, but enough to pay an entrance fee.By the way, on Cinemanía analogies of characters in Pirates of the Caribbean I read with Star Wars. And are not on the wrong track: Luke and Leia as Will Turner (Bloom) and Elizabeth Swann (Keira). Han Solo (Harrison Ford) as Jack Sparrow. C3PO and R2D2 as the couple of the canijo tuerto and el gordo. Up Will Turner seeks to save his father in disgrace (Bill the boots). And that sentence of. "the dark side of ambition"?